The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/06/2007AGENDA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION December 6, 2007 Notice is hereby given nf a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on December 6; 2007, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be recommended for.placement on the agenda.) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - November 1, 2007 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.) PUBLIC HEARING A. . Case No. MS-07-04: An application filed by Brian Johnson for approval of a 2-lot minor subdivision plat with a lot width variance for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 3516 Jay Street. B. Case No. MS-07-05: An application filed by Patrick Hyland for approval of a 3-lot minar subdivision plat for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at approximately 6330 W. 30th Avenue. 8. OTHER ITEMS 9. ADJOURNMENT ( CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting November 1, 2007 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair SCEZNEY at 7:00 Pm. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colarado. 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commission Members Present: Staff Members Present: AnneBrinkman Jim Chilvers Dick Matthews ' John McMillin Commumty Development Director Sally Payne, Senior Planner Ann<Lazzeri, Secretary 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner MATTHEWS and seconded by Commissioner STEWART to approve the order of the agenda. The motion passed 8-0. 5. APPROVAL OF 1VIINUTES - August 16, 2007 It was moved by Commissioner BRINKMAN and seconded by Commissioner MATTHEWS to approve the minutes of August 16, 2007. The motion passed 7-1 with Commissioner McMILLIN abstaining. 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) There was no one to appear before the Commission at this time. Planning Commission Minutes 1 November 1, 2007 PUBLIC HEARING Prior to presentation of the following case, Commissioner REINHART disclosed that he is a consultant for a real estate developer with property interests in close proximity to, but not in the area of, the Arvada transit station framework plan. His client owns no property in Wheat Ridge and has no financial interest or preferred outcome of this hearing. He stated that he met with the City Attorney who advised that there would be no conflict of interest in his hearing of the case. A. Case No. WPA-07-03: A resolution adopting Arvada's Kipling TOD Station Plan as an amendment to the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan. Sally Payne introduced this case. The City of Arvada has been working on transit station planning for the RTD FasTracks Gold Line stations. One of the proposed stations in Arvada is the Kipling Station located in close proximity to the Super Target at Kipling and Sls`. Transit oriented development (TOD) consisting of mixed uses and higher densities is being proposed for the Kipling Station. The City of Arvada has requested the City of Wheat Ridge adopt their Transit Station Framework Plan as it relates to the lands within the City of Wheat Ridge. The Framework Plan is proposed to supersede the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan for the area within the Wheat Ridge city limits. By adopting this plan, the City of Wheat Ridge would be supporting cooperative land use planning ensuring that compatible land uses are being proposed in areas adjacent to sunounding jurisdictions. City staff supports the resolution for reasons outlined in the staff report. Ms. Payne introduced KeVin Nichols with the Arvada Community Development Department. He presented Arvada's goals and principles for TOD. Arvada believes it is important`to have inter-jurisdictional coordination in development of the transit station. He reviewed the details of the Plan. Gommissioner McMILLIN agreed with the breakdown of housing in the Plan. However, he expressed coiicem that 200 parking spaces for the Kipling station seems to be extremely inadequate. Also, structured parking would be preferable over surface parking: Mr. Nichols explained that RTD has indicated it would only fund surface parking. Commissioner CHILVERS commented that many light rail customers would probably end up using the Target parking lot. Mr. Nichols stated that shared parking with Target is something to be considered. Commissioner STEWART asked about building height restrictions in the Plan. Mr. Nichols stated that Arvada's present zoning allows for 35-feet for building height, however, the height can be varied and taller heights will be allowed in the zoning for the TOD areas. Commissioner STEWART asked if Arvada would Planning Commission Minutes 2 November 1, 2007 expect Wheat Ridge to change its height restrictions. Mr. Nichols replied that Arvada would ask Wheat Ridge to consider that. Sally Payne reminded Commissioners fliat the city charter sets height liinits at 35 feet and density at 21 units per acre. Commissioner STEWART asked how many residents are envisioned for the area. Mr. Nichols estimated about 2,000. Commissioner STEWART expressed concern about bringing more traffic into an already congested area. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked what Arvada's vision was for the character of the Kipling transit station. Mr. Nichols stated that Red Rocks College and residential use would play a big part in the character of the station. Commissioner BRINKMAN favored keeping the parking where it is shown in the mixed use and she highly recommended going up with multi-level puking rather than out with more surface parking. She agreed that 200 spaces did not seem sufficient. Commissioner SCEZNEY asked Mr. Nichols to explain the market survey recommendations and bus service in connection with the transit station. Mr. Nichols stated that the survey difln't show strong retail use for the area. He explained that RTD plans to link the transit stations with bus service. Commissioner REINHART expressed concern about access to I-25 from Kipling. In response tp his questions, Mr. Nichols stated that RTD would be responsible for building a platform and surface parking. If RTD believes a new road is necessary to access their parking facility and far bus circulation, the road would be part of their budget.; A pedestrian bridge may also be needed but the need has not been determined at this time. There was discussion about changing the height and density provisions of the city charter. Commissioner STEWART commented that citizens have shown over and over that they do not want a change in these provisions. Increased density will bring more vehicle traffic. Commissioner McMILLIN commented that changing the Comprehensive Plan is done occasionally, however changing the charter is a matter than caruiot be taken lightly. Commissioner REINHART suggested that if these limits should ever be waived, transit oriented development would be the place to do it. Commissioner MATTHEWS stated that he would support a bonus in height and / density along light rail corridors. \ Planning Commission Minutes 3 November 1, 2007 It was moved bv Couimissioner R1i1NFIAI2T and secondecl bv Commissioner MATTHE«S to adopt Resolution 04-2007, a resolution recominending adoption of the Arvada Transit Station Framewor(e Plan as it applies to land within the City of Wheat Ridge and forwarcting this recommendatiou along with the Resolution to City Council for their consideraYion. The motion passecl7-1 with Commissioner Mc1bII1.LIN voting no. It was moved by Couunissioner McD11I,.LIN and secondecl by Commissioner STEWART that because the sense of the Commission is that 200 spaces, as currently envisioned, is not sufficient to serve velticle trips from Wheat Ridge and Arvada, planners should lobb,y for mare parking by three possible sohitions: (a) preferably building a multi-stary garage; (b) using undeveloped tand in thc interim until the garabe is built, and (c) seeking shared parking arrangements with the eiisting large parking IoY of Yhe 'I'arget store. The motion passed 8-0. 8. OTHER ITEMS There were no other items for the Commission"s'consideration. 9. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner STEWART and seconded by Commissioner SPANIEL to adjourn the meeting at $:30 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Jerry Scezney, Chair Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes 4 November 1, 2007 4 ° CIty Of J~`7~Theat~dge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: Meredith Reckert DATE: November 28, 2007 SUBJECT: Case No. MS-07-04/Johnson Please be advised that Staff is recommending a continuance of Case No. MS-07-04/Johnson, a request for a two-lot minor subdivision plat with a lot width variance for properry located at 3516 Jay Street. A continuation until January 3, 2008 is recommended. No staff report was written and no discussion regazding the case should occur. Suggested motion: "I move to continue Case No. MS-07-04, a request for approval of a two lot minor subdivision with a lot width variance for property zoned R-2, Residential-Two at 3516 Jay Street, until Thursday, January 3, 2008." ~OFWH~T9a CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ~ m PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT °~toan~o TO: Planning Comxnission CASE MANAGER: Travis Crane CASE NO. & NAME: MS-07-05/Hyland DATE OF MEETING: December 6, 2007 ACTION REQUESTED: A request for approval of a three-lot subdivision plat for property zoned Residential Two. LOCATION OF REQUEST: approximately 6330 W. 30°i Avenue APPLICANT (S): Patrick Hyland OWNER (S): same 950 Greenway Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 APPROXIMATE AREA: 40,440 sq. fr. (0.92 ac.) PRESENT ZONING: Residential Two (R-2) ENTER INTO RECORD: O COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIAL.S (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Planning Commission MS-07-05/Hyland All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. 1. CASE ANALYSIS The applicant (owner) is requesting approval of a three-lot subdivision plat. The property is currently zoned Residential Two (R-2). The applicant wishes to subdivide the property and create three lots. The R-2 zone district allows single- and two-family residential structures (depending on lot size) and accessory buildings. The property is 40,440 square feet in size and slopes from south to north. The applicant is in the process of constructing a two-family structure on the northern portion of the property. A building permit was reviewed and approved in October of this year. Placement of the structure was designed in anticipafion of the subdivision; all setbacks and lot coverage requirements will be met if the subdivision is approved. II. SUBDIVISION PLAT The plat will subdivide the property into three lots (Exhibit 1, Plat). Lot 1 will have direct frontage on W. 30th Avenue. I,ots 2 and 3 will be located directly south of Lot 1 and will be accessed by a private drive. The Code of Laws allows a maximum of four dwelling units to be accessed by a private drive. The private drive will be located on the western side of the property, and will be 20 feet in width. When subdividing one parcel into multiple parcels, each newly created parcel should meet the district standards for minimum lot size and width. The minimum size and width of an R-21ot is based upon type of residential structure located on the lot. A single family structure in the R-2 zone district requires minimum lot size of at least 9,000 squaze feet and a minimum lot width of at least 75 feet. A two-family structure in the R-2 zone district requires minimum lot size of at least 12,500 squaze feet and a minimum lot width of at least 100 feet. The applicant is currendy constructing a duplex on the northern portion of the property. Therefore, Lot 1 must meet the minimum lot size standazds for a two-family dwelling. Lot 1 will be 12,535 square feet in size. Lot 2 will be 13,800 squaze feet in size. Lot 3 will be 14,105 square feet in size. All of the lots will be 115 feet in width. Because all lots wIll gain access from the north, the lot width is measured at the northern property line, which is considered the front yard. All three lots will be large enough and wide enough for a two-family shucture. Easements Typical utility easements are being established around the perimeter of each lot. There is an existing water easement located in the northwest corner of the property. A main water line is located within the easement. The duplex currently being constructed on what will be Lot 1 does noY encroach upon this easement. There is an existing lateral ditch which bisects what will become Lot 3. An easement has been established on this plat which runs east to west on the lower third of Lot 3. This easement as shown on the plat is the proposed locauon of the lateral, not the actual location. Staff recommends that as a condition of approval, the easement be shown at the actual location of the lateral. The applicant may negotiate with the owners of the lateral to relocate the lateral. The i applicant has indicated that conversations regazding moving this lateral have begun; however, an agreement has not been reached to date. Planning Commission MS-07-05/Hyland If the lateral and easement aze relocated, an administrative plat amendment will be required. Aaencv Referral All responding agencies have indicated that they can serve the property, and the applicant will beaz the cost of upgrading any service to the property. Water service will be provided by the Wheat Ridge Water District. The Wheat Ridge Fire District indicated that the width of the private drive was acceptable. An approved turn-around will be required at time of building permit for Lot 3. The Fire District has indicated that this can be accomplished by constructing a larger driveway which accesses L.ot 3. The Subdivision Regulations require that pazkland dedication is required for any residential subdivision. Typically, this takes the form of a fee in lieu of land dedication. The applicant will be required to pay the fee in lieu prior to recordation of the plat. The Public Works Department has indicated that an escrow will be required in lieu of installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to W. 3& Avenue. Because the adjacent properties do not have any of these public improvements installed, the escrow will be retained until such time that it is feasible to install the public improvements. III. STAFF CONCLUSION & RECONIMENDED MOTION (S): Because this is a three-lot minor subdivision, Planning Commission is the final deciding authority. Staff concludes that the proposed subdivision meets all of the requirements of Article IV of the Code of Laws. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the subdivision plat. OPTION A: "I move to APPROVE Case No. MS-07-05, a request for approval of a three lot subdivision plat for property located at approximately 6330 W. 3& Avenue, for the following reasons: l. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. All required utility easements are being provided. 3. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use." With the following condition: 1. The lateral easement shown on I.ot 3 shall be moved to encompass the actual location of the lateral." OPTION B: "I move to DENY Case No. MS-07-05, a request for approval of a three lot subdivision plat for property located at approximately 6330 W. 300' Avenue for the following reasons: » Planning Couunission MS-07-05/Hyland s ~ ' I 1 W. 38TH AVE. > > ~T_ OI~ HEN.I.~ERSON'S SU~DIVISION, PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS DAY OF 20___, BY THE CITY > > r 5'~UT~I, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P,1V1:, oF W"EAT Ria~E P~ANNiN~ ~oMMissioN. 1 > > QN, STATE OF COLORAD~ CHAIRPERSON SHEET 1 OF 1 W. 32ND A. ~ NE CORNER Z NW CORNER , , „ Q SW 1 4 SEC. 25 N89 41 48 E 2644.60' SW 1/4, SEC, 25 ~ Q ~ = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT BASIS OF BEARINGS ^ j CITY CERTfFICATION g ~ N6 ~52, ~ SITE ~ ~ \3 , 2 m N m ~ S A 6'~ a 0 W 2 1 H V E. S 4\ S 9 ' • I I APPROVED THIS DAY OF 20___, BY THE CITY QF WHEAT RIDGE. J • SQ, ~V f" ~ ~ a Z ~ o Q W W 0 _ _ ~ _ _ _ ~ ATTEST U y, ~ - - - - - o W W ~ / 55 - q a ~j ~ 1 3 ~ Q .~:O.W. 3 ~ 5 ~.5' s. 30TH AVE. 50 ~ ~ CITY CLERK ~ ~ Q ~ J ~ J ~ Q MAYOR \ ~ / 128.1 DW / / \ ~ ~,tQ ~ » > ~ 1.8' N, ~ N ~~,g9 41 OS E AM 115.00 (,A~I) ~ ) N % ' 6.1' N,~4 12.0' W, 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR - - - - ~ . O~ AM 0,3' E./~ 1 IL1lY EASEMENl 66.24 (AM) 105 8( ) , 3 RM ~9 ~ 3 2.3' S. 3 0.4' N, 0.1 N. • P~ ~ -FS' ~ 8~ - - - 0'~ 8 W. 20TH AV. ~ Z o R 6~ ~E Z ' L~ ~ ~ 0`~ j ° ~6 W W C~66 ~ Q ~ ~ PART OF ~ r PART OF LOT 2, BLOCK 5 W,~ Q ~ W ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ J (NOT TO SCALE) ~ W ~ ~ ~ , ~n OWNER'S CERTIFICATE ~ W ~OT iA \ F _ W 12, 535 S ~ I, BEING THE OWNER OF REAL ~ ~ PROPERTY CONTAINING 0.928 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ~ ~ ~N ~ Q Z R2 ZON G q ~ ~ W T N HUNDRED FIFTEEN 115 FEET OF LOTS ONE 1 AND FOUR o ~ THE ES 0 E ( } ( ) ~ ~p 4 BLOCK FIVE 5, EXCEPT THE SOUTH TWO HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT 258 ~ N ~ ~ ) FEET THEREOF, AMENDED PLAT OF HENDERSON'S SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF ~ N ~ ~ ~ JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS - - - - - - - - FOLLOWS: Y 10' UTlLITY EASEMENl v~ Z ~ N89 4108 E o , ° Z COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF Z ~ 115.00 m 0 m _ 10' U71Ll7Y EASEMENI' . Z SECTION 25, T3S, R69W, WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE N - ~ ~ O SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 BEARS NORTH 89'41 48 EAST; N 3 Z Z ~ - " M CAP ~ ~ ° N THENCE SOUTH 63°54'59"EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1540,54 FEET TO TH~ SET #5 REBAR W/ 1 1/2 A~UMINU o ~ ~ PAT FHN R ~ ~ ~ ~ NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5, AMENDED L 0 E DE SON'S FLATIRONS SURVEYING LS 16406 Q~ ~ Q o N LJ SUBDIVISION, BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ~ ~ o W g ~ W ~ THENCE NORTH 89'41'08"EAST, A DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET; 0 FOUND #5 REBAR W/ PLASTIC CAP z ~ Q N ~ J THENCE SOUTH 0°10'50"EAST, A DISTANCE OF 351.64 FEET; PLS 9655 AEGIS ~ Q ~ c~ ~ THENCE SOUTH 89'40'28"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET; ~ ~~n m ~ L THENCE NORTH 0°10'S0"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 351.67 FEET, TO THE TRUE 2 » ° ~n 0 FOUND 1-1~2 BRASS TAG IN CHISLELED CROSS ~ POINT OF BEGINNING; W LOT 2A ~ IN CONC, - PLS 9655 AEGIS \ ~ I HAVE LAID OUT SU$DIVIDED AND PLATTED SAID ~AND AS PER TNE c~n 13,800 SF ~ , I N R TNE NAME AND STYLE OF HYLAND 3 W m ORAWING NEREON CONTA NED U DE 0 FOUND ~5 W/ P~ASTIC COLLAR ~ W t MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT, A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY OF PLS 7735 CHICHESTER ~ R2 ZONING ~ I AT T ? z WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, AND BY THESE PRESENTS DO DED C E~ THE r CITY OF WHEAT RIOGE AND THOSE MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND/OR 4 o W MUNICIPAL~Y FRANCHISED UTILITIES AND SERVICES, THOSE PORTIONS OF 0 FOUND SPIKE N ? REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, 50 FOUND 5 REBAR o 1 ~I _ ~ J INSTAL~ATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE AND 60 FOUND 1 2" SQUARE PIN ^ ~ ~ ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LINES, WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES, ~ ~ Q 10' UTIU]'Y EASEMENT Q ~ ~ HYDRANTS, STORM WATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS, STREET + FOUND CHISELED CROSS " N89'41'08"E " LIGHTS AND AL~ APPURTENANCES THERETO. 3 w . (AM) AS MEASURED ~ 115.00 , ~ O f0 U7ILITY EASEMENT fJ - - - - - - - - WATER METER ~ ~ O O OWNER ~ UTILITY POLE p i p , W - Z W STATE OF COLORADO ) -OVU OVERHEAD UTILITY ~ ) SS , 3 w ~ ~ COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) -X-X- FENCE 1.0 W. ~ ^ PROPOSED LOT DATA ARE IN ITAUCS THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS Z ~ DAY OF A.D. 20____ BY W NVER WATER LOT 3A ~ D DE ~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: W 14 105 SF ~ ~ _ _ - i :~::r u . a R2 ZONING N h NOTARY PUBLIC ~ .t 5' Dll'CH EASEMENl ~ ~ - - - - - - - - DEDICATORY STATEMENT Y Z U ~ ~ N - - - - - - - ~ Y Z m , 1,2' W. o U N O A D D I T I O N A L R I G H T O F W A Y I S T O B E D E D I C A T E D B Y T H I S P L A T. ~ ~ o u r i c~ r r E a s E M E N r 1 ~ m Z ~ N , 1 . ~ „ - ~ ~.2 w. S 89 40 28 W(AM) ~ Z ~ o , ~ 115.00 (AM) 0 0 ~ „ ~ ~o ~ -'N CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT LANGUAGE Q ° _ - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~n ~ ° n{ ~ THE OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS GRANTS LIMITED RIGHTS AND ~ a ~ EXCEPTED a , PRIVILEGES TO ACCESS AND TO FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH THOSE AREAS ~ Q , , PART OF LOT 4, BLOCK 5 a. ~ INDICATED AS CROSS-ACCESS / INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENTS, AS 30 ~ ILLUSTRATED UPON THIS PLAT. SUCH GRANT OF EASEMENT SHALL BE ~ LIMITED TO THE OWNERS, TENANTS, CUSTOMERS, AND GUESTS OF THE Q R2 ZON I N G OWNERS, AND SHALL FURTHERMORE GRANT ACCESS TO AND FREE N 1.6' E, i MOVEMENT THROUGH SAID EASEMENTS TO THOSE ENTERING SAID ~ T , ~ N89'39'35'E(AM) FOUND CHISELED 199.90'(AM) EASEMENTS FROM SIMILARLY RECORDED EASEMENTS FROM ADJACEN ~ CROSS IN CONC. ~ 9~ ~ N 115.00 (AM) P R T I A N D O R F R O M A B U T T I N G P U B L I C S T R E E T S. o.~s' w. oF Tnc 2 PRO E ES / ~'_-I~.- , ' r. 29TH AVE. 50' R.O.W.) 1.8 E. CL ~ BO( STANDARD EASEMENT LANGUAGE ir c~ni _ -zn' AC~ Y ~ UF JEI-FtKSUN GUUNIY AI GULUtN, COLORADO ON THIS o G.l ~vvi riR-)i ,~UDIVI/IINL EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY DEDICATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AS SHOWN UF HEREON. THESE EASEMENTS ARE DEDICATED FOR THE INSTALLATION DA` DAY OF 20__ AT 0'CLOCK __M. ?1 15 2007 REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS MAINTENANCE. AND REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEVISION CABLE, 0 15 30 60 DRAINAGE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. UTILITIES SHALL ALSO BE PERMITTED WITHIN ANY ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE STREETS iN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER Flatirons, lnc. - Surveying, Engineering & Geomatics SUBDIVISION. PERMANENT STRUCTURES AND WATER METERS SHALL NOT BE JEF PERMITTED WITHIN SAID UTILITY EASEMENTS. BY: 3825 IRlS AVENUE 655 FOURTH AVENUE BY: - BOULDER, CD 80303 LONGMONT, CO 80501 DEPUTY CLERK CASE HISTORY PN: (303) 443-7001 PH: (303) 776-1733 FAX: (303) 443-9830 FAX (303) 776-4355 MS-07-05 PLOTTED 11/28/2007 Established 1983 00 www.ilatsurv.com