Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/20/2000CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting January 6, 2000 Staff Members Present: 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Alan White, Planning Director Martin Omer, Economic Developmen Specialist/Planner Ann Lazzeri, Secretary 4. APPROVAL OF ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner COLLINS to approve the order of the agenda. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0, with Commissioner GOKEY abseAtt. It was moved by Commissioner COOPER and seconded by Commissioner COLLINS to approve the minutes of December 16, 1999. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0, with Commissioners BRINKMAN and SNOW abstaining and Commissioner GOKEY absent. 6. PUBLIC FORUM There was no one signed up to speak before the Commission on unscheduled matters. Planning Commission Page I January 6, 2000 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No, MS-99-06: Application by Legend Properties, LLC, for approval of a two-lot subdivision for the purpose of developing a commercial building for small businesses located at 9751 West 44th Avenue. This case was presented by Martin Omer. He reviewed the staff report and presented overheads of the property. All pertinent documents were entered into the record and accepted by Chair MACDOUGALL. Mr. Omer advised the Commission that there was jurisdiction to hear the case, Page A- I contained an error concerning the property to the west and should be corrected to read "residential land uses" rather than "undeveloped". In response • a question from Commissioner SNOW, Mr. Omer stated that no street dedications were required by the Public Works Department and there were no requirements for an accel/decel lane • 44th Avenue. 700 - MIRMMININSE01 Stil 00 111 •o. • rty at this time. 1:1111 IN Tony Ficco 12415 West 38th Avenue In response to a question from Commissioner BFJNKMAN concerning the ditch, Mr. Ficco Chado property was farmed years ago, irrigation water passed through his property, but an actual physical ditch with water running no longer exists. Planning Commission Page 2 January 6, 2000 x9m 9890 West 44th Avenue Mr. Cluck stated that he was representing his father, Jaxnes Cluck, who resides across the street from the subject property. He was swom by Chair MACDOUGALL, He had reviewed the applicant's plan and believed it was a very good plan. He believed the acce from 44th Avenue was adequate, I Commissioner SNOW stated that since this has not gone before the Parks and Recreation C,ommissloll. It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner THOMPSON that Case No. MS-99-06, a request for a two-lot minor subdivision be approved for the following reasons: 1. With the conditions approved, all requirements of the City's Subdivisil Regulations will have been met. 2. Subdividing this property as proposed will legitimize a previous sale of the individual parcels and thereby allow for redevelopment of the property. Subject to the following conditions: Planning Cornmissiori Page 3 January 6, 2000 1. A 22-foot cross access easement will be provided between the northwest corner of Lot 1 and the northeast corner of Lot 2 and will be shown on the plat with standard cross access easement language approved by the city attorney. 2. A 5% park land dedication will be required unless the Parks Commission proposes an alternative to the required park dedication. 3. The language regarding utility easements requested by Public Service be shown on the plat. 5. The drainage plan which has been submitted will be made a part of the subdivision and recorded with it. 6. An easement, as defined by state statute and Wheat Midge subdivision regulations sufficient for drainage and to allow for maintenance of the ditch and as approved by the Oulette Ditch Company, will be shown on the subdivision plat. Ji I I N I I Jil I J I F I Ji �! I ii III Jill This case was presented by Martin Omer. He reviewed the staff report and presented slid and overheads of the property. All pertinent documents were entered into the record and accepted by Chair MACDOUGALL. Mr. Omer advised the Commission that there was jurisdiction to hear the case. Staff recommendation was for approval of the application wi conditions as outlined in the staff report, I Planning Commission Page 4 MZM3�� Commissioner BRINKMAN expressed concern that, based upon the decision by the Parks Commission, everything approved this evening could have to be redesigned. She also expressed concern about reviewing such a large number of changes and conditions that could leave room for error. In response to a question from Commissioner COOPER, Mr. Omer stated that vacancy rates for these types of developments are very low. Commissioner THOMPSON expressed concern about the uses nearest residenti development such as open overhead doors and fumes from idling trucks, etc. I Commissioner THOMPSON asked Mr. Ficco if he would be opposed to one-way-in and one- way-out traffic circulation. Mr. Ficco replied that staff was of the opinion that two-way traffic flow would work better and that the two-way traffic plan has worked very well in other locations. In reply to a question from Commissioner THOMPSON, Mr. Ficco stated that he would be agreeable to whatever the Planning Commission decided about lighting on the property, He also stated that signage for the individual businesses would be unifon Planning Conu-nission Page 5 January 6, 2000 Commissioner COLLINS noted that it was 11:00 p.m. and suggested continuing the hearing due to the lateness • the hour. i''111" 1-clirr; ri • lilt tin U.Wt past Y YMM 7.1n. W - MV - DIZ MattEr IN IFFUM1 UC MvIeWCU al 11:30 p.m. The motion passed by a vote of 6 to I with Commissioner COLLINS voting, no and commissioner GOKEY absent. Planning Conunission Page 6 January 6, 2000 Commissioner THOMPSON moved and Commissioner COOPER seconded that the meeting continue past 11:30 p.m. in order to complete the list of uses and allow for questions from the Commission before continuing the matter to another meeting. The motion carried by a vote of 6-1 with Commissioner BRINKMAN voting no and Commissioner GOKEY absent. Chair MACDOUGALL asked if there were others present who wished to address this matter. Carol Oman had signed the public hearing roster but indicated she did not want t* speak at this time. In response to a question from Commissioner COLLINS, Mr. Ficco stated that he plans to remove the 4-foot chain link fence and replace it with a 6-foot solid fence. If the school to the north wishes to retain the 4-foot chain link fence, Mr. Ficco would build the 6-foot solid fence anyway. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner COLLINS seconded that the Com \ � ----~=--------~ Page 7 January 6, 2000 r! Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner COLLINS seconded that the previous approval of MS-99-06 be amended to correct the labeling of the adjacent zoning on the plat (the property closest to 44th Avenue presently shown as R-2 should be labeled C- 1) and that the existing building be shown with an outline as well as the setback to the property line. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0 with Commissioner GOKEY absent. 8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair MACDOUGALL declared the public hearing portion of the meeting, to be closed. • A. Group Homes for Sex Offenders - Commissioner THOMPSON asked if this issue needs to be revisited. Alan White stated that the City Councilman from District I wants to review group home matters and homes for sex offenders will • addressed at that time. 11. COMMISSION REPORTS There were no commission reports. 12. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS There were • reports. I 1 11 111 11 f 111ME111W11144111 FON1110MMA(MON W Planning Commission Page 8 January 6, 2000 City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: i'��Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Training/Educational Videos DATE: January 13, 2000 The following are the titles of the training packets we have. Unless indicated otherwise, the training packets contain only one tape. Primer on Constitutional Law (two tapes) • Meeting Management - A Mock Commission Hearing Ethical Decisions in Planning Community Decision Making in Urban Design • Understanding the Design Context C, We will preview the tapes and report about content at the January 20 commission meeting. am= FROM: Alan White, Planning and Development Director 0 6 ME Now that the Comprehensive Plan has been adopted by Council, there remains a question about the status of the various master plans for smaller areas of the City. Since the motion to adopt the Comprehensive Plan did not repeal these plans, they still exist. This creates confusion in giving direction to applicants as well as responding to the rezoning criterion of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The plans in question are: Fruitdale Valley Master Plan • Town Center Urban Renewal Plan (a.ka. Master Plan) • Kipling Activity Center Master Plan 0 Wadsworth Boulevard Corridor Plan 111 �� pill ill 111 I posed to the City Attorney the question of which plan in a particular area took precedence and his response was as follows: I I Until the plans are repealed, they still legally exist. As to potential conflicts between plans, there are two rules: 111111�11piii 2. , We have the options of repealing the plans, recognizing the plans as adopted, or re- adopting portions • the plans. The Town Center Urban Renewal Plan should remain in effect as adopted. It is a legal requirement to have an urban renewal plan if you have an urban renewal area. A list of Town Center desir guidelines was ## # ted # Commission and Cit� Council and is still I r City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum am= FROM: Alan White, Planning and Development Director 0 6 ME Now that the Comprehensive Plan has been adopted by Council, there remains a question about the status of the various master plans for smaller areas of the City. Since the motion to adopt the Comprehensive Plan did not repeal these plans, they still exist. This creates confusion in giving direction to applicants as well as responding to the rezoning criterion of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The plans in question are: Fruitdale Valley Master Plan • Town Center Urban Renewal Plan (a.ka. Master Plan) • Kipling Activity Center Master Plan 0 Wadsworth Boulevard Corridor Plan 111 �� pill ill 111 I posed to the City Attorney the question of which plan in a particular area took precedence and his response was as follows: I I Until the plans are repealed, they still legally exist. As to potential conflicts between plans, there are two rules: 111111�11piii 2. , We have the options of repealing the plans, recognizing the plans as adopted, or re- adopting portions • the plans. The Town Center Urban Renewal Plan should remain in effect as adopted. It is a legal requirement to have an urban renewal plan if you have an urban renewal area. A list of Town Center desir guidelines was ## # ted # Commission and Cit� Council and is still I r Because the Wadsworth Boulevard Corridor Plan provides more specificity to design and land uses in the corridor than the Comprehensive Plan, that plan should remain in effect as adopted. The Frultdale Valley and Kipling Activity Center Master Plans should be repealed for the following reasons: 1 Many of the objectives listed in the Fruitdale and Kipling Plans (buffering, setbacks, lot coverage bonuses) were never translated into regulations, The plans refer to "high quality design but give no specific guidelines for what it is or how to achieve it. 1 In the Fruitdale Plan, several of the desired goals are no longer valid (redesign of street system south of 44", west of Vivian and realignment of Youngfield with Ward Road). Many of the goals speced in the Kipling Plan will be addressed by the hotel/motel program. This issue is presented to Planning Commission at this time for discussion only. Official acti • the Planning Commission will need to occur at a public hearing. i C:\MyFiles�WPFiles\COMPPLA,N'aiiiasterplasimemo.wpd t Po 19 4 N AM* I Developed by the Fruiitdale Master Plan Committee 1 October 1984 Revised December 1984 Presented to the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission February 1985 Adopted by the Wheat Ridge City Council May 13, 1985 I TABLE OF CONTENTS !I lag= mgmmlff•�� NMMRRW SECTION IX. MASTER PLANS FOR AREA DEVELOPMENT C. FASTER PLAN & DEVELOP ENT.GUIDELINES FOR THE FRUITDALE YAL.LEY- NEIGHBORHOOD? EXPLANATION: Exhibit A. is the .. which gives greater land use detail for decision making. Exhibit B. is not part of the Master Plan, but is a related amendment to the * « « that the Master . * * *' Use Map are generally consistent. C. MASTER PLAN a FRUITDALE VALLEY NEIGHBORHOOD 1. INTENT. A hierarchy of encourages containment of commercial « s« they don't encroach or disrupt residential areas is promoted. A i I (1) Develop stree which can handle the can be expected in this major road. 7 improvements along West 44th Avenue ' heavier load that currently exists and ";he future. Control turns on and off -2- (5) Expand West 44th Avenue to a 4 lane street between Miller and Tabor Streets. This should be done within a 60-70 foot right-of-way. (See Exhibit C.) (6) Develop a plan for alignment of Youngfield with Ward Road . (7) Develop Tabor Street north of West 44th Avenue to 1-70 to a full collector street standard. Also consider a traffic signal at its intersection with West 44th Avenue. b. Internal Traffic & Parking (private streets, parkin drives) Multi-residential and commercial/office development often causes additional parking and circulation problems. (1) Promote internal vehicular circulation systems which allow smooth traffic flow. Provide adequate parking within a - project that feeds safely onto the public street system. Encourage integration • parking lots and street access. C. Lack of Safe School Children FRUITDALE VALLEY NEIGHBORHOO# II. Land Uses Problem: a. There has been a problem with undesirable or incom- patible uses in the past and the same danger exists in the future. Policy Recommendation.- Problem: b. Some uses cause nuisances to adjacent areas such as noise, odor, visual or other pollution. Policy Recommendation: ( 1 ) Require high quality buffering through land- scaping, setbacks, fences, etc., as well as site design which protects adjacent properties. III. Site & Building Desi&n a. There is concern that new buildings will be high or unattractively designed, posing unsightly views • adjacent neighbors, • blocking views alto- gether. ( 1 ) Promote high quality design of the building in terms of materials as well as sensitivity to adjacent uses regarding height, scale, orientation, etc. 0 M C TRAVEL LANES: 4 at 1 fW r C. 2.5 toot "ok • feet i • • a r .. ,�► air ® Aw Traffic Llj w t SUB . ...Faint i • There is concern about lack of code enforcement and its effect on property values. M, ( 1 ) Implement code enforcement which requires maintenance of landscaping, parking areas, drives, curb cuts, etc. (4) parking, street access and street improvements (5) landscaping (6) methods to integrate the proposed development with adjacent properties including methods to mitigate potential negative impacts on residential properties Such site plan, upon approval, shall become a condition to zoning or special use permit approval, and shall be used for site development and use and for future code enforcement action, if needed. IM. I ,— I ilk ��II35ii1 °��� �� —.,, fi �1•��1iiYfi ���,�/ab.�iy.�'�'�! VAPA yu E I T_ 4.77 god P t PA 4 I MA MAW. 'Flwp_Twy.w_�v_ MW MULTIPLE LAND USE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY CENTER PUBLIC PARK ^ROF'OSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP EXHIBIT B M I "Al 1 1 � LIU iii 11 11 1 nt;Illoill i 1 11 • 0 i" y 9 • maim 1. The Project A. The Concept .......................................... ___ ........... ......... B. Goals and Objectives, ............................................ ........... ............ C, Financing Plan ... ..................................................... ....... — ... ........... ..... ....... D. Project Area .................................................................................. ................. - ... 2 11. Introduction and Background of Phase II, Phase III and Phase IV A. Creating New Development and Retail Activity ...................... ..............................3 B. Proposed Project Objectives ....... ............................................................ ......... _3 C, Project Activities, .................................................... ............... ..... --_—.4 D. Phase IV Expansion Area ........................................ ........ ....... 5 III. Urban Renewal Plan A. Statutory Authority ........................................ ....... ...... -- .................................. 6 B. The Urban Renewal Area and the Project Area .................... ..............................6 C. Project Purposes ............................................................. ............................ —6 D, Land Use Regulations, Building Requirements & Voluntary Rehabilitation ... - ...... 7 E. Project Activities .......... ...................................................................................... 8 F. Project Financing ................................................................................... ...... I I G. Changes in the Approved Plan ..................................... ...... ............... ........ — — 14 HMinor Variations .................................................... ...................................... —. 14 I. Cooperation Agreements ............................... ....................................................14 J. Wheat Ridge Town Center Master Plan Incorporated .......... ............................... 14 WHEAT RIDGE TOWN CENTER MODIFIED URBAN RENEWAL PLAN =#2 NJ a - -mgm a wl M&I a " 0 Phase IV of the Project expands the urban renewal area to include a parcel at the Northwest comer of West 44 Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard to allow for infrastructure improvements. All of the Project Objectives, Project Activities adopted in Phase II and Phase III of the Plan are extended to the Expansion Area, as shown on Exhibit B. The goals and objectives of the Wheat Ridge Town Center Project are described in Kv- 4kWgT-i-"f herein • reference. C. FINANCING PLAN Phase I was financed with the utilization • sales tax increment and real prope tax increment. All project elements were undertaken and paid for as the tax increments were collected. I ♦ The Project Area is shown as a cross-hatched area on Exhibit A and Exhibit B. N II. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND OF PHASE II (1987) AND PHASE III (1992) AND PHASE IV (1997) . •• •'` 0 2. The Authority may rehabilitate existing structures, parking lots, or other infrastructure improvements, provided that the property owners are willing to cooperate financially. 4. The Authority may beautify the Project Area through increased internal landscaping'. perimeter landscaping, improved public amenities or improved infrastructure. N 10 10 1 The project activities shall be to participate and assist in the new development, redevelopment or rehabilitation of the Wheat Ridge Town Center, which by way of illustration and not by limitation may include the following: 1. Assist or cooperate with a developer, redeveloper or rehabilitator in tf completion of a development in the Wheat Ridge Town Center, I 2. Acquire by lease, negotiated agreement or exercise of the power of eminent domain the right to fee simple interest or any other interest in real property and personal property; and/or 5. Provision of public improvements and facilities which may include but not be limited to traffic control devices, street and traffic access improvements, curbs and gutters, drives, sidewalks, parks and perimeter landscaping, M drainage and signage. The acquison of necessary public right-of-way to satisfy the classification of Wadsworth Boulevard as a "Major Regional Arterial" according to the Colorado Department of Transportation, and the construction of transportation improvements related thereto may also be included in such projects; and/or 6. Provide financial assistance in the design and construction of private development, redevelopment or rehabilitation project wich may inclu grants, services-in-kind, is and other means of financial assistance and/or 7. Assist in the overall beautification of the Wheat Ridge Town Center, which may include various improvements and landscaping. � �# T �- 4. =## R III. URBAN RENEWAL PLAN A, SIAIMRY- ALIHQRIIY Rowwwou-nmanim arwayl*)!�M The "'Project" describes the sum total of all Project Elements and Project Purposes previously described in Section 11 and Attachment 4 and described in this Section IM MONFIMITIOMM"wasilki 6 4. Provision of a stronger, more balanced tax base through new developme or rehabilitation of existing properties resulting in increased coi I 5. Encouragement of rehabtation of properties that have a potential for function more compatible with new development. # T Create a Town Center with a main street type area for the community of Wheat Ridge. D. LAND USE REGULATIONS, BUILDING REQUIREMENTS AND VOLUNTARY REHABILITATION. N L-10001:0TI Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Authority shall exercise each or any of the powers set forth in this Section IME, Subsection I through 6 inclusive, R nly upon the prior approval by a majority • those members of the Wheat Ridge City Council present and voting at a regular or special city council meeting. JUCI 111C =111y7mcut ano MUM oi Tne XMinonty may be rented, leased, or controlled in any legal manner, pending its disposition for redevelopment. 93 F Relocation benefits will be available only to businesses functioning and residents living within the Project Area and occupying properties to Acquire Property under the laws related to the power of eminent domain. The Relocation Handbook shall include, but not be. limited to, the following a. The procedures for applying for relocation benefits from the Authority; b. The manner in which the Authority shall pay such relocation expenses; C. The moving expenses and related expenses for which the Authority shall it the relocatee; & The method for appealing a determination of the relocation negotiator or Relocation Committee to the Board of Commissioners of the Authority; and N e. The expenses for which the Authority can not pay relocation benefits, including but not limited to: MMMMEMMM= MMMW��� I I Losses for which the relocatee shall receive reimbursement or compensation from another source,, 5. Costs of constructing or moving real property improvements; and The minimum benefits to which all eligible relocatees shall be entitled shall be in accordance with the applicable statutory and legal requirements. The Authority may sell, lease, • otherwise transfer real property or any interest therein acquired by it as a part or an urban renewal project for residential, recreational, commercial, industria� or any other legal uses in accordance with the Urban Renewal Law of the State of Colorado, Section 31-25-106(l), C.R.S. as amended or any other applicable laws. Moog Buildings, structures, pavements and other improvements may be demolished and cleared from property which the Authority acquires, and the Mot"rty may be prepared for new improvements in accordance with this Plan. I W-TiTs' I � H F PROJECT EIN-ANCINQ, ME Ciq Coltncii present ana FgTIYT of bfic7i7i city Qvtncii Mectinr Authority may utilize any, all, • a combination of the following financing mechanisms in implementing the Project as herein defined. W.M. 2. IAS IGQ=CRL The following information describes the division of funds necessary to implement the tax increment mechanism for the Authority under this Plan. This description relates to all property taxes and municipal sales taxes generated within the urban renewal area. M d The Authority has established a tax increment revenue fund for the deposit of all funds generated pursuant to the division of property and municipal sales tax revenue described in this section regarding financing and any other funds so designated by the Authority- ' f The division of municipal sales taxes generated and collected from vAthin the Project Area after December 3 1, 198 1, shall be: A shall be paid into the funds of the City annually commencing on January 1, 198 1, and the first day of January of each year thereafter. M 4. All interest earned on the deposit or investment of funds allocated to the tax increment fund shall be paid into the t increment fund of the Authority. .9 The division of ad valorem property taxes for the project area shall be divided and paid to the Authority by the Jefferson County Treasurer as provided ► Colorado law. (goill Isr-K M All ,All MI principal of, the interest on and any premiums due in connection with the bonds, loans, advances and indebtedness of the Authority, Where a literal enforcement of the provisions contained in this Plan would constitute an unreasonable limitation beyond the intent and purpose of these ' }4 ,' ' 1, URBAN RENEWAL AREA h R� W •STN AVL ( 6S K 44TM AVE � } N w Thy AGRL 4.At ol u .,... _„ ... ... ol . t Md 3qT" AVE ,,. ,... _.. . ...,... ol t j ! o lo _. _ -1 -4, fi 5qTH Ave M7tit AVM EXPA s "H I S"JON AREA [MuLl 3 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE X air 1 iqf 411w S/w w #RA w on ,. 01 4090 I x11 4. �^' f # � .�, �,.. .. t , �< fAlk ..` � ' .,...+..., �. i1E .111111! ....r, ......� ....�. � . ...�,..... ` � 1 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF W4EAT RIOCE, COLORADO, TMAT: ' EXHIBIT D ORDINANCE NO- 4�Z_ PAGE - Section 4. The Mayor is hereby directed, pursuant to C.R.S. 1973, 31-25-104, to appoint 7 cor-missioners to serve on the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of • • with abstent,i ,=, this 18th day of r* 1981. SIGNED • the Mayor on t�hls day • r—tglk. , 1981. FRANK STITES, t 4t . ATTEST: 2 2 ' CityrClerk 1st Publication: Sept. 17, 1981 2nd Publication: Oct. 8, 1981 Wheat Ridge Sentinel Effective Date: Oct. 18, 1981 APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY Z HAYES, C14ATT RATE °``' 73 vi I 1 !1111111 TITLE: RESOLUTION APPROVING A LIMITED WADSWOR11* TOWN CENTER PROJECT L)ATED DECEMER 9 1981, INCLUDING THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN. WHEREAS, p-blic notice has been given and the City Council has held public hearings o:i September 28, 1981 and on December 14, 1981 on the Wadsworth Town Center Project and Urban Renewal Plan. WHEREAS, the City Council has established an Urban Renewal Authority. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the Urban Renewal Plan conforms to the Comprehensive Development Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council finds that there is blight the Wadsworth Town Center Project Area which area is the Urban Renewal Plan Area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council finds that the Urban Renew Plan conforms to the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Development Plan. I DONE AND RESOLVED this 14th dav of __De�gmbgr , A.D., 1981. FRANK ST uES, MAYOR CA L F.'AMIPF, CITY CLERK' VNTRODUCED BY COUNCILMEMBER MERKL OrdinanCe No. 709 Series of 1986 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 23-3 AND 23-4 OF THE CODE OF LAWS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, THEREBY ESTABLISHING THE WHEAT RIDGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND REVITALIZATION COMMISSION AND PROVIDING GUIDELINES FOR THE MEMBERSHIP THEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEA RIDGE, COLORADO AS FOLLOWSi Section 1: Section 23-3 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat R13ge 1 hereby repealed and reenacted as follows: Section !# Development and Revitalization Commission Established; Rights and Duties Generally. Section 2. Section 23-4 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge is hereby repealed and reenacted as follows: Section 23-4. Appointment of Members; Number The Commission shall consist of nine (9) Commissioners, two (2) of such Commissioners being from each of the existing, or hereafter altered, City Council Districts, and one Commissioner to serve at large. Those members of the Urban Renewal Authority presently serving as Urban Renewal Commissioners shall continue to serve the term • which-they were originally appointed without regard to Council District residency until such time as the term to which they have been appointed has expired. Each appointment to the Commission shall be made by the Mayor subject to approval by majorvote ♦ the entire City Council. The term of office • each Commissioner shall be five (5) years. Terms of office shall be staggered so that the term of at least one (1) Commissioner shall expire each year. Section 2. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragFaph,'oF of this ordinance or the application thereof tR any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjudged • a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect one (1) day after finaT ATTEST: lst Publication: - 1/1/1987 APPROVE 2nd Publication: 1/15/1987 OFFIC Wheat Ridge Sentinel: Effective Date: 1/16/1987 FIXI Irl"MMMM 0 0 A finding of blight in an area is not confined to a single matter, but rather it is a cumulative conclusion attributable to physical, environmental, social and economic factors. No single factor can be authoritatively cited as a cause of blight. C.R.S. section 31-25-103(2) defines "blighted area" as follows. In recognition of this, this survey has measured a wide range of physical, environmental and socio-economic factors based on field survey work and interviews conducted with various city and special district agencies, Data has been gathered and evaluated in the following general areas: 1. Land Use. 2. Utilities 3. Traffic 4, Public Streets 5. Access 6. Site Conditions 7. Building Conditions 8. General Health and Safety. depicted in graphic form to show the geographic incidence of various blighting factors. Maps OWN"" 2.0 RA_CKQ_RD_V_ND The Phase IV expansion area consists of five buildings and a Public Service Co natural gas pressure control station. This parcel is located in the northwest comer of W. 44' Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard. To the east and south of the subject parcel is a commercial area. Approximately three- quarters (3/4) of the northern boundary is adjacent to a commercial use. The remaining area is adjacent to a multi-family area. The western boundary is adjacent to commercially zoned areas as well. The properties adjacent to the west area are currently being used as office and a personal residence. In addition to the interview, a physical survey of conditions occurred. Attempts were made to measure the area of Building #4 and Building #5 but were not successful due to the inability to access the rear portions thereof This survey was conducted on foot between March 7, 1.►• 7 and May 19, 1997. 0 1 M! 1IM.V After the agency interviews and field surveys were completed, a series • 6 exhibits was prepared to document the various blight factors. These exhibits consist of a base map designation of the survey area boundaries with symbolic indication of each of the blighting factors noted, A description of each of the six exhibits is as follows: I I I I I: I i IRISH" I , UAR1 0 Exhibit I Utilities; The public infrastructure to serve the area is inadequate. Building # 1, which is currently being used as a restaurant is served by a one- half inch water line. A minimum of a one inch water line is required. Building #2, when used as an auction house, also had inadequate restrooms due to the size of the water line. Overhead power lines are within the setback of West 44" Avenue. They also contribute to a visually cluttered and unkempt appearance over the entire area and contribute to a very unpleasant and unaesthetic sense of the entire area.. 9 Exbibit 5; Acgg5s; One of the major design flaws of the intersection is the location of the access points onto the roadway. They are located within 35 feet of the intersection, without provision for acceleration/deceleration lanes. They also violate the width and spacing requirements of the City and the State Highway Access Code. El Building #* ) has numerous broken windows and appears to have suffered from water damage, Building #5 does not appear to have doors and is in a state of teterioration. ONEWWWWWOR141 An analysis of the various conditions found in the Phase 11 Expansion Area leads to the conclusion that blight as defined • the Colorado State Statutes, does exist. No single factor was considered as in itself"blightine but rather the presence of numerous factors which are cumulative in effect. If there is a single factor that stands out as "Blight" it is the encroachment of the buildings onto the right-of-way resulting in a dangerous intersection. R U- V W Y � I t .w.+ v 4i+t �/� U) 4I cc 41st X yyy y� W } IRt tt V� CL V I f W Y � I t .w.+ v C wM Y �/� U) 4I X X W W } IIIIIIIIM�YN11115�YIWMM�III�IM11�1 )e j i 04 in • I NS's I owl F t C) M 0 4 0 IIIIIIIIM�YN11115�YIWMM�III�IM11�1 )e j i 04 in • I NS's I owl �i. 0 0' c 0 c • 0 c co Z :E x x III III Wadsworth Boulevard CD Q7 C;) c 0 E 0 c co c cz Je c (D 0 --) �i. 0 0' c 0 c • 0 c co Z :E x x III III Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge Police Department Calls for Service At 7685 W 44th Ave., Type of Call 1993 1994 1995 1996 Assist 2 Disturbance Harassment Juvenile Trouble JV'oise Disturbance Private Property Accident 1 1 2 Suspicious PersotuTticident 3 1 Trabil 1 I U111vantedPersots sk g 1997 Total as of 051097 61FMCM �'% p ug"g-alwalma LOCATION OF 30 4 !; l 318 ! u 2 ! t0 1:89 2:43 # 28 f !♦ 12 6 ! # # ! i l, ! 28100 10261 1.36 2-14 t # •• " • s S2SW 19,27 1.14 2.18 t 0+ 2 1 4 r• 1.10 7-36 20 12 7 2 01 fM 0 0 . 9 8 23 13 • 6 r 25120 18 14 8 1 # :tMY r # .. # f ! t i f f « ¢ # f # f + 0 . 6 1 6 17 • • 17 3 ! !! M 13 4 i 1 0200 # " # " x s ' # * tf4 # x f # t f • 6 0 422 !♦ 15.40 0.71 2.27 11 22 11 f 15400 't 31 '23 # t x 14 24 • �! # S ! ! ! # 32 25 4 2 o i l ! r 6 ' f. • 0 4700 1.72 0. 58" # M 0 0 # -! r :.. r i 1.24 21 28 x 21 # 426 00 # # « • t • f !! # # • •« t sf # 26 31 5 ! i +. M # o' 20150 7.35 05 1 33 33 4 1 ! t! # 19 34 * . • # !! t 24 36 # !* # 42 37 n.. f!• # 22 38 • f f • #! # r # * • • f # f tt # 0. # 2S 411 • • y xf• # 4 43 42 • • # tt! i # Y 34 43 x oi ! 6 0 # 48 44 2 0 0 rt * # 49 45 21 0 # f!! # f 0 . 3 0 27 46 t •' • # k• x .. 0 0 35 47 S # # # # *, # 0 0 # # r #♦ # # 45 49 * « 31 f DOCUMENTATION OF ' BLIGHT. PHASE I The term ghted Area" is not necessarily synonvmous with 11 Slum",'as in the context of early renewal project;, and the terms should not be confused with regard to the findings herein. Mg. 0 00 "ential - These Streets have been relegated largely to a status of commercial access, which is incompa�ible with their arterial Classification, their regional importance and their primary -,function • Pumping high volumes of traffic trough the area. According to Department of Highways counts, Wadsworth Blvd. has tradonally carried the heaviest north-south traffic volumes in the City, while 44th Avenue carries the heaviest east-west volume, and 38th Avenue next second to W. 44th Ave in east-west traffic volume. The Colorado Division of Highway Safety report for 1977 compare accident frequency with other suburban cities of the Denve region. I City Accidents per 1220 2opulation Wheat Ridge 70.6 Golden 52.2 Lakewood 43.5 Aurora 34.8 Arvada 30.8 2 Census data informs us that 0 15* of Wheat Ridge workers us private autos to get to work. This statistic, coupled with th fact that Project Area streets carry a large portion of thi traffic, adds significance to this element of blight. I Siting of buildings and activities fronting on periphery streets detracts from bility and recognon of the internal retail establishments. There are six auto oriented businesses.' eight eating establishments, four nonconsumer type businesses and two financial instit,: plus other businesses fronting on "he street while interior businesses general!y suffer from lower than normal sales. M The lack of overall site planning and piecemeal development has resulted in poor internal circulation with no connection between the north and South nodes of the Project Area. Unif ication of the two halves would benef it most businesses and greatly improve traffic circulation and safety. Underutilization of the Project Area site, combined with interest anN external transportation problems, has resulted in subpar sales per square f oot of retail space, and revenue per square foot Of site far below the norm. E interest, whi the backs Present an unpleasant view to adjacent- properties. Archit -ec*tural design, being a matter of changing tastes. Should be considered in discussions of blicht only when -�,--garish or ug as development. to detract from marketability or retard There are three pockets with classic signs of early deterioration in the Project Area. At the southeast Corner of the Project Area are five houses fair condition of which four are quite old. They have a combination of residential, commercial, and • home • occupation uses, and vacancy, and are flaked by service stations. 4 I That portion of the Southeast 1/4 Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 6• West of the 6' P County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, described as follows: TOGETHER WITH that portion of the Southeast 1/4 Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6' P.M., described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 23, and 330.0 feet West of the Southeast comer of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 23; thence West along said South line, 45.0 feet; thence North 150.0 feet; thence East 45.0 feet; thence South 150.0 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT that portion of subject property lying within existing right-of-way for West 44h Avenue, along the South line, and EXCEPT any portion of subject property lying within the East 10 acres of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6' P.M. and right-of- way for the Apel Seepage Ditch as disclosed by instrument filed in Ditch Maps Book 2 at Page 161 and existing utility lines or fixtures and any existing ditches not'shown of record, EXHIBIT f4 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND TO PHASE 1 (1981-1986) (WADSWORTH ,-TOWN CENTER PROJECT) . The primary purpose of Phase I of this Plan was to implement a joint development project between -the City and the commercial property owners to create a 45 acre commercial center in the Wadsworth Commercial Activity Center which was called the *# i• TOWN CENTER. A par I k, landscaping and street improvements were financed by participation • property owners and through tax increment, paid out of taxes generated within the project area. No additional taxes were assessed to the owners or to the general public. This constitutes a private-public partnership for revitalization. The following steps were taken to reach this point of action: WHEAT RIDG COMPREMENSIV DEVELOPMM E- = 1-276 SHOPPlNG CENTE PROJEC In April of 1981, the city council directed the Staff to initiate the necessary steps to accomplish the Wadsworth Town Center `"Project which included the purchase Of a connecting easement and the establishment o f an Urban Renewal Authority so the tax increment financing tool would be available for the project- 4 Facilitate the acquisition or dedication of easements for a north/south major connector drive between West 38th Avenue and West 44th Avenue at the front of the Park-n-Shop and Time Square main buildings. 2. Design and construct that portion of the proposed major connector drive across the Barsch and Currier properties to connect the Time Square and Park --n -Shop commercial nodes. 3. Acquire property behind Etta's Place and Jack BOX for the proposed Town Center Park development, by use of Jefferson County open Space funds. 4. Design and construct the Town Center Park. 4 7. Develop a main entrance to Park-n-Shop Center to include a new traffic signal at 39th Avenue and entrance improvements such as new curb racii, medians, landscaping and lighting. 8. Work with property owners within the Urban Renewal area to establish a public/private cooperative project, with an equitable sharing of costs, to develop the remaining portions of the major Connector Drive between West 38th and West 44th as shown on Exhibit 'V - 7 4, in order to achieve good vehicular circulation and improved safety for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic through the use of landscaping and other design options. 9. Construction of the connector drive including demolition of the apartment building. Cost to construct the drive estimated not to exceed $50,00 Apartment building demolition is not to exceed $10,000. 9/13/82 10. Cleanup and modest development on the park to make it safe, attractive and well lighted. The lights illuminate the connector drive along with the park. Cost is estimated not to exceed $10,000. 9/13/82 11. -Transferred from the City to WRURA, contract rights from Dunaway, Merat and the new park to construct the connector on the properties and construction easements. 9/13/82 14. Authorized the Urban Renewal Authority to work ,�, �, A. WHEAT RIDGE TOWN CENTER - Master Plan I Dg And EMg2g$Q "SECTION II. GOALS & OBJECTIVES FOR THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. enacting performance standards for all ass 0 0 0 rerr.T.19M R C. • provide for additional commercial, office and services uses provided that they are conveniently located, attractively developed and meet the demonstrated needs of the City. (Page 11-4) By encouraging the development of community activity centers encompassing a broad rance of land uses, each complementing the other. These centers must be pedestrian oriented and be unified architecturally. (Page 2. By promoting concepts such as shared parking or parking structures within commercial areas or activity centers so as to encourage pedestrian' activity, thereby reducing use of the automobile. (Page 11-4) 4. By providing the amount of land required for the community activity centers, by redevelopment of existing commercial areas, if necessary. (Page 11-4) GOALS: Open Space (Page 11-4) A. To provide cultural and recreational opportunities for all citizens. B. • provide psychological visual relief from the effects of urbanization. OBJECTIVES: 2. By encouraging the use of plazas, landscaped areas, parkways, open space and buffer areas within new developments and redevelopments. (Page 11-4) GOALS: (Page 11-6) A. To participate in the development of a well- balanced regional transportation system to move people and goods in a safe, expeditious and economic manner. el • ensure public safety for pedestrians, 12. By encouraging screening of parking areas by use ­ of grade separation, landscaping or walls. (Page 11-7) IV. ECONOMIC BASE (Page 11-9) a t A. . To encourage a strong diversified economic base, which will enable the City to provide quality services at a reasonable tax rati. B. To utilize the limited developable commercial land in a responsible manner. C. To provide a full range of retail shopping with special emphasis upon increasing furniture, clothing and dry goods sales. 4 provide a pleasant shopping environment which OBJECTIVES: (Page 11-9) 2. By providing incentives for business to relocated to the activity centers and by channeling appropriate new development to the activity centers. (Page 11-9) including within the zoning ordinance, bonuses in lot coverage for such elements as excellent design of commercial areas. (Page II-10) TI. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE GOALS: (PAGE II-11) B. To provide an aesthetic asset to the community and to Provide visual and psychological relief from the effects of urbanizations. C. To provide open space that functions as part of the structural framework of the City. lip. To provide diverse cultural facilities and acti7ities. 4 9. Her encouraging the inclusion of plazas, malls, buffers and landscaping in proposed development. (Page 11 -13)" The proposed planned commercial centers are to be located: Along Wadsworth Boulevard between approximately West 38th Avenue t West 45 th would serve the community generally - ! • as south of Clear Creek and Dover east of (Page w • ' • • T o m Qrn:trr GOAL:: Improve or eliminate conditions of blight. •' JECTIVES: *Upgrad deteriorated structures, parking areas, interior circulation routes, and general grounds appearance. *Improve pedestrian connection, and access opportunities • # i the Town Center. *Provide more of land and functional design. *Promote attractive design in new development and redevelopment circulation GOAL: Improve safety for vehicular and pedestrian ! OBJECTIVES: *Provide for defined interior circulation routes as differentiated from parking lot circulation. *Provide for designated pedestrian walks and crossings. *Reduce • # ! and existing Town Center and other traveling on bordering streets. *Provide ! # • ! mass transit service and *Upgrade parking lot and exterior building lighting • increase night time ! crime prevention. Stabilize f! improve business environment providing for a sound and increasing tax base. OBJECTIVES: increased patronage # existing businesses, and construction # patronage of new businesses improvements # access, attractiveness # identity. *Promote, a balanced mix of commercial uses, however, encourage the use of the ground floor of structures located within the commercial' category on Figure for retail sales and service uses to create a strong retail center. U unique a. Turn two underdeveloped commercial nodes into a acre unified shopping center with a greatly =• sales tax base. b. Create a TOWN CENTER for Wheat Ridge. C. Concepts. (1} Name of the total project. THE WHEAT RIDGE TOWN CENTER. ) Strengthen tree city designation with tree planting on edge. '(3) Create a heritage park as the central focal point of the promenade. (4) Strong use of color in the plantings to last the full growing seasons. (5) Create a safer more attractive parking lot and circulation area for shoppers as they drive and walk. (6) Create strong visual and sound barriers, through use of substantial landscaping, berms, fences or walls and grade separation, in order to provide maximum protection to residential uses which abut new commercial development. 4 . I1 m nta== fro DI WHEAT fRID6E TOWN GENTER MASTER PLAN El 12 M IV d� Wanda San - City ,3 rk t.,A, NU. WSP-94-1 wmm_ Dan wildie, -Mayor non-glare b. Use of bronze 6.. Landscaping shall be designed to achieve the following objectives: • .- . ,.. EW B. KI ACTIVITY CENTER - Master Plan' +� r • The area generally bound b n orth, on o south, and Miller Street on the west, has been designatei- Rid City Council as Commerci ft• Ff�asF�Ynr�� :srrta:ww.d...�.��� ®'_......e >. •..... . _ ., _ .. _ _ O "SECTION II. GOALS & RI II. LAND USE. GOALS: GENERAL 9 Y w y O "SECTION II. GOALS & RI II. LAND USE. GOALS: GENERAL 9 By enacting perf standa for all development _„_ im pact .. envir # econ omy . -(Pag e # extensi « t o : #_ innovatio � # pi c onservatio n usin 8. By beautifying the City, method development of pa rkways, buryin utility lines, enforcement of sign and building codes, and requiring more landscaping on p rojects. GOALS.* Commercial # I prov f or • # service uses provided that they are conveniently located, attractively developed and meet the demonstrated needs of the City. (Page 11-4) 0 OBJECTIVES encouraging of .. -. areas, parkways, open space and buffer areas within new developments and redevelopments. (Page 11-4) III. TRANSPORTATION GOALS: (Page II -6) A. To participate in the development of a well- balanced regional transportation system to mo people and goods in a safe, expeditious and economic manner. I C. To ensure public safety for pedestrian bicyclists R motorists. decrease G. To promote the development of activity centers which will of automobile. H. To increase the attractiveness of the City's (Page • OBJECTIVES. (Page 1I -7) 5. By controlling access from businesses along major streets by decreasing the number of • 7. By providing more sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, bikeways and pedestrian bridges. : By improving and adding, where necessary, traffic controls d.! synchronized signs. 10. By promoting and providing incentives for shared parking and parking 11r decrease amount # • ♦ of devoted automobile, ! , encourage pedestrian By provision of additional landscaping along major streets, which will improve • also buffer adjoining uses from the effects of 12. By encouraging screening of parking areas by use of grade separation, landscaping or walls. (Page ECONOMIC (Page ! K A. To encourage a strong diversified economic base, which will enable t o provide quality services at a reasonable limited B. To utilize the developable o land in a responsible In addition 4 goals and objectives • in the Comprehensive Development Plan, the following section illuminates the ^'i for t o f urther define and i eA:+m-'n&te--- o f the v arious commercial activity centers. El The proposed • t commercial centers are to be located: In the vicinity of i • Street between Clea Creek and Highway would se roughly the northern portion of quite is still i of vacant l and h ere f or al types of development. (Page IV-18) . . . . . r r A. GOAL: Improve • conditions of w underutilization h aphazard l and use patterns. OBJECTIVES (1) Upgrade the physical conditions of deteriorated structures, parking areas, interior circulation routes, and general grounds appearance. 9 Establish M commercial'activity center from the northern boundary of the City, approximately 51st Avenue extended, i Clear C reek on • which focuses on • Development Kipling/I-70 Interchange and the Kipling and 44th Avenue Intersection. OBJECTIVES l k l) Encourage increased patronage of existing businesses and construction and patronage of new businesses improvements circulation, identity. 2 through traffic and the City wide and neighborhood traffic that uses the east -west collector street system. :Retail sales businesses should be the first priority, followed by service and office uses. C. GOAL: Improve safety for vehicular and pedestrian circulation and access. OBJEC'T'IVES negative (5) Minimize the «a -« by • trailers by .« use • « properly their providing • them, where they occur, through proper design of parking areas and circulation routes. a illustrates the vehicular traffic circulation routes a control facilities--both existing and proposed--which serve, or are necessary to serve, these centers. This shall serve as a guide to future public and private capital facility planning. I Figure 3 details use categories for various areas withi the Project Area. I Those use categories are described as follows: M210g� Park: A mix of retail, office, service, commercial, and/or light industrial uses. Retai i a ir n-- n_4__J primarily oriented to the interstate or highway traffic. A Mix of retail, service, and/or Office uses. BUbIJ,Q: Pennington Elementary School. Multi-Ea ilv: Camelot Club and Ptarmigan multi- family developments. ChUmah: United Methodist Church. Er,tail: Primarily retail uses.. QkffiZe: Primarily office uses. EhQ221pa Q ntgz:: A planned development with major emphasis on retail sales uses. Both Figures 3 and 4 shall serve as guides for future rezonings, site plan reviews, and building permit reviews. I "�riet to any devel-opmerstr- Along with any request f or 8 , E IX -'1