HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/07/1988MINUTES OF STUDY SESSION MEETING
CITY
• WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 2, 1988 7:30 P.M.
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER: The Study Session Meeting of the
Wheat Ridge Planning Commission was called to order by Acting
Chairman SCOMA at 7:30 P.M., June 2, 1988, in the Council
Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue,
Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS:
STAFF PRESENT:
Glen Gidley, Planning Director
Seemah Betz, Secretary
The following is the official set of Planning Commission minutes of
June 2, 1988, Study Session Meeting. A set of these minutes is
retained in the Office of the City Clerk and the Planning Division.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
STUDY SESSION MINUTES- JUNE 2, 1988 PAGE 2
3. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (items of new and old business
may be recommended for placement on the agenda)
Motion by Commissioner EDWARD, seconded by Commissioner
KILLIAN, for approval of the agenda. Carried unanimously,
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 19, 1988
Motion ,
1988, CERVENY, that the minutes of May 19, Carried 3-0, Commissioners
JOHNSON and EDWARDS
5. STUDY SESSION
A. Planned Development and Industrial Districts
Mr. Gidley presented the proposed revisions to the Planned
Development and industrial Districts.
It was noted that there are no mobile home parks in the
City at present but future annexations may present
opportunities.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
STUDY SESSION MINUTES - JUNE 2, 1988
The specific regulations governing each Planned
Development District was discussed. Mr. Gidley gave a
detailed presentation.
Mr. Gidley stated that specific changes will be made by
motion at the Public Hearing on these ordinances. The
Public Hearing will be scheduled during July.
B. Annexation policy
it was decided to discuss this matter in detail at the
June 16th meeting. Mr. Gidley stated that written
information will be provided for discussion.
6. OLD BUSINESS
7. NEW BUSINESS
Study Session - June 16, 1988
Planning Commission decided to hold a Study Session meeting on
June 16th at 7:30 P.M.
Motion for adjournment carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned
at 9:30 P.M.
- Seem - afi;� Betz, Secretary
A G E N D A
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 2, 1988 7:30 P.M.
T U D Y S E S S I 0 N
6. OLD BUSINESS
7. NEW BUSINESS
Last fall, City Council established a list of prioritized Goals and
Objectives, which included several items which involves Planning
Commission action. one of those items identified was the need to set an
process, however, the basic philosophy of the City, that is policy, must
be established by the City.
cities' adopted policies.-
1.
All
water rights must
be donated to the City.
2.
Must
rezone to Planned
Development.
3. Utility services must either be fully developed already, or must
be feasibly extended at the property owners/developers' expense.
4. The annexation area can be adequately and cost effectively served by
City Police, Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and other City
5. Public improvements (i.e., streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
street lighting, traffic control devices, drainage improvements,
6. The time frame for development is reasonably related to the need to
provide City services such that the development will pay for the
7. There must be a positive fiscal impact on the City for providing
City services versus the tax base or other benefits expected to
offset the costs to the City.
3. There is a geographic and situational priority for annexation based
A . Raw Land Policy (Undeveloped)
1) Generally, raw land annexation is a lower priority than
2) There must be a valid public need served.
3) There must be the physical and economic capacity to provide
services.
4) Development will occur in a reasonable time period.
5) Must be a a positive cost benefit to the City.
6) The owner/developer install all necessary utilities and
other public improvements, and expand or upgrade existing
facilities where necessary, at their expense.
7) There should be a social benefit and/or economic tie between
the area being annexed and the City.
Annexation Policy
L.
Annexation Policy
As you can see, there is a range of concerns and issues covered by
various cities. I think the basic issue, however, can be reduced to
these:
C. Are existing facilities which meet City standards already present to
serve the proposed development, or, if not, will the owners/
D. Is there an adequate supply of water to support intended
development?
E. Will there be a positive cost/revenue position for the City within a
reasonable time frame?
0 1
have attached a small scale map, Exhibit "B", which illustrates Wheat
Ridge and environs, and Jefferson County unincorporated enclosures and
areas west to North and South Table Mountains. Please develop any
additional policy statements which you feel are unique to Wheat Ridge,
and identify those froin the list above which you feel should be included
(modified?), as Wheat Ridge policy. Also, identify any specific
geographic areas on the attached map, which you feel should be
annexation target areas.
A-5
(Showing changes made by
S.B. 45; May 28, 1987)
Im
ULWU
IM
"Period of
!
for ♦ !
between
the effective
date of
the resolution establishing the
hearing
date !
date
! first commences.
!
"Qualified
elector"
r registered elector, as-
defined
part of
resident
! ! of
proposed ! be annexed.
IM
m
(11) One-half or • i land in the area proposed
to i . . (including agricultural, i. the
landowners of such agricultural land, under oath, express an
intention to devote ♦ to such agricultural for w
period if not
It
FM
(f) In establishing the boundaries of any area proposed
to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is
annexed, the entire width of said street or alley shall be
included within the area annexed.
ME
10
i
Add iti ona l * c ond iti ons on i
Additional terms or conditions may be imposed by the governing
b i n acc ordance sectio
•_ • • i • •
annexati
electi Petition i annexa �
d Accom the p etiti on c opies o
annexation map containing the following information-,
(1) A written legal description of the boundaries o f
M
M
(II) A map showing the boundary of the area proposed to
be annexed;
(III) Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of
the location of each ownership tract in unplatted land and, if
part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the
plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks;
(IV) Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be
annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the annexing
municipality and the contiguous boundary of any other
municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed.
Petition for ! election:
-8-
WE
10
A t
1 Additional and conditions on ♦ i
Additional i conditions may be imposed by
governing body in accordance with section 31-12-112.
M
MR
Kul
• • 1t NU OWIM t M - Po lOtillow
4 4
Y !
(a) A map or maps of the municipality and adjacent
territory to show the fallowing information:
(I) The present and proposed boundaries of the
municipality in the vicinity
of the proposed annexation;
(II) The present streets, major trunk water mains, sewer
interceptors and outfalls, other utility 'fines and ditches,
and the proposed extension of such streets and utility lines
in the vicinity of the proposed annexation; and
(III) The existing and proposed land use pattern in the
areas to be annexed;
(b) A copy of any draft or final preannexation
agreement, if available; .
(c) A statement setting forth the plans of the
municipality for extending to or otherwise providing for,
within the area to be annexed, municipal services performed by
or on behalf of the municipality at the time of annexation;
(d) A statement setting for the method under which the
municipality plans to finance the extension of the municipal
services into the area to be annexed; and
(e) •A statement identifying existing districts within
the area to be annexed,
(f} A statement on the effect of annexation upon local -
public school district systems including the estimated number
of students generated and the capital construction required to
educate such students.
(2) All proceedings at the hearing and any continuances
thereof shall be recorded, but the recorder's notes need not
be transcribed unless proceedings for judicial review are
initiated provided section
board of aY town may dispense
the reporting of the hearing as provided in this section and
substitute in lieu thereof
presentation of each # ' Y and describing the proceedings of
J
5"
y
•
municipality • petition
district court of the county in which the area proposed to be
annexed or part thereof • .. to h old such election.
commissioners ♦ additional • t f•
provided •. subsection of
judges or of the election, shall take the oath requir t.
by ; judges of genera •..
result of • t respective •.• • • •
fd'O
costs t expenses connected with such
annexation # including commissioner fees and all
election expenses when incurred, shall be paid by the
municipality to which the annexation is proposed.
(2) (a) The annexing municipality shall:
one ## of # ,# with the
original of the annexation ordinance in the office of the
clerk of the annexing municipality-,
A for # # g# two certified copies of
annexation ordinance and map of the area annexed containing a
legal description of such area with the county clerk and
recorder of each county affected;
f No annexation
recorder of county
ti of such annexation
of local government of the
M
requirements am
of # t o « . s # { of tp r « # w t of
paragraph of t # are met.
action •. # the validity of
annexation proceeding, failure of the annexing municipality to
have made the filings by this subsection
not be deemed to invalidate annexation ## ## cause
for #
An # be effective for purpose of
general #. on # after January ensuing.
(4) In the event that an annexation which has the effect
of changing county lines occurs before January 1, the assessor
of the county from which such area was detached shall provide
to the assessor of the county t o which such area has been
R ##'X on or before F ebruary #
following.*
(a) An abstract of the total valuation for assessment of
all taxable property so transferred;
M
disputed M #
contain boundary contiguity with either municipality, the ballot shall
# questions:
"For Annexation" and "Against Annexation", and
11
(11) "For annexation to w.www.wwwww.wwwwww wwww #wwwrswr♦
mm
m
M
(A) Any party bringing such action shall first have
filed a motion for reconsideration within ten days of the
effective date of the ordinance finalizing the challenged
annexation, which motion shall state with particularity the
grounds upon which judicial review is sought.
(3) Review proceedings institute, under this section
shall not be extended further than to determine whether the
governing body has exceeded its jurisdiction or abused its
discretion under the provisions of this part 1.
• Any annexation accomplished in accordance
except provisions of this part I shall not be directly or
collaterally questioned in any suit, action, or proceeding,
as expressly section.
(6) All proceedings for judicial review of any
annexation proceeding under this part 1 shall be advanced as a
matter of immediate public interest and concern and heard at
the earliest practical moment. The courts shall be open at
all times for the purposes of this part
am
rm
31-12-117. Effect, of review and of voiding of annexation
Im
2m
* Pri ority of • • • -. •
purpose e - • to give a first priority to
annexation proceedings.
Im
am
(4) The court shall determine:
basis of
aggregate • for property
M
MM
school district and the aggregate valuation for assessment of
all property • proposed # be # t
(b) On the basis of the most recent enrollment records
of the school district, the aggregate number of pupils
enrolled in the school district and aggregate of
pupils # enrolled who live in area # ! i of R to be
annexed.
Kim
t • •. #. ••
-25-
M
Relation of part t o o ther
powers conferred and limitatioRs r• • by part I shall
be in addition and supplemental to and not in substitution for
powers conferred by other
ptny2n-
Notwithstanding any provisions of r the
contrary, r apply to the city and county
of Denver.
M
Coutrty
January 13, 1988
!
Pau: Har a e
11i ector o Community Resources
attachment "`"" C.. :- _.
a3 D
Division of Community Resources
Paul Hargrave, Director
Courthouse, 1700 Arapahoe, Golden, Colorado 80419 Y
277.8520
City of Ridge
Michael J. Smith, City Administrator
P.O. Box ••
Wheat Ridge, CO ii!
Dear Mr. Smith:
N 0 1 [we 0 = a* I *I I I Ul i!
N - o
! •
JOHN P. STONE
District •
Tour cooperation
matter,is
greatly appreciated. The procedures outlined
in the attachment
will facilitate
the County's
w't ! x • hopefully
Mt ►•
s
problems.
r would be
if a copy of all
information formally
to the Board of County
Commissioners be
sent directly to
the Jefferson
County Planning Department, 1700
Arapahoe, of r '
I
i or r of the municipality and adjacent . to show the
following #
M The present and proposed boundaries of the municipality in the
vicinity of the proposed annexation.
1. All maps must contain all boundaries
municipality within one mile of the lands proposed for
annexation. Municipal boundaries should be clearly mark
and the municipality identified. Maps should contain
adequate 4 and scale. I
2. Maps should depict created by the proposed
annexation. addition, # as a result
annexation, of the 9" should be included
with the submission documents to indicate annexation intentio
or # a # M to any enclave created. I
present streets, major ► # and
extensi outfalls, other utility lines and ditches, and the proposed
of a utility lines and ditches,
proposed extension of such streets and utility lines in the vicinity
of the proposed annexation.
1. All existing major 4 thoroughfares should M
clearly depicted by name.
2. All proposed streets through m bar •. w be identified
so they can be distinquished from existing streets and other
improvements.
regarding 3. A written statement at • of proposed
use of • lands on or i
generation be submitted. The statements should also include specific trip
data s m the lands proposed r annexation.
(III) The existing and proposed land use pattern in the areas to be
annexed.
Specific data needed
L. # : # on map.
2. A statement addressing how the proposed use and zoning relate
r the County i Use Plan and County •
districts.
0
9
statement 3. This detailed .proposed zonin including as a minimum:
residential, i ndicate k - of residential
density per tr. ! of i projected
population.
# If commercial and industrial, t of
commercial/industrial ! "
projected work f orce Ri!
forth 4. If the proposed annexation involves lands located within a mile
of a major installation such as airports or federal Installation,
the impact narrative should include statements as to impacts of
the proposed annexation on such installation, or if there are
any impacts by such installation upon the proposed lands to be
b. A copy of any draft pre-annexation agreement, if availabliT
C. A statement setting plans of municipality
otherwise providing for, within the area to be •. ! municipal
annexation: services performed by or . on behalf of the municipality at the time of
Identify 1. 4 be provided and a schedule t
delivery of each named service, i nformation
relating to fire, police, and roads should be
included.
d. A statement setting forth the method under which the murLcipality plans
to finance the extension of municipal services into the areas to be
r" •.
1. Please indicate the specific finance mechanism to be used in
financing the extension of services, e.g., sales tax, bonding,
etc. and describe the structure of the financing mechanism.
e. A statement identifying existing districts within the area to be annexed;
and
f. A statement on the effect of annexation upon local-public school distri
qystems, including the estimated number of students governed and the
capital construction required to educate such students.
B. Three Mile Radius Plan (31 -12 -105 C.R.S.)
Please ensure that a copy of the three mile radius plan is included with your
submission.
E
5.44.2 The County Attorney's Office shall establish a file for each annexation
petition �nd review the submittal for compliance with the time requirements
set forth in Section 31-12-108 and 108.5 C.R.S. The County Attorney's
Office shall provide written notice to the appropriate municipality if it
fails to comply with the above described time requirements.
5.44.8 If the City Council#S action is contrary to the position taken by the
Board of County Ccmnissioners th ma s h a ll b b roug h t to the attenti
of the Board for a determination as to whether a motion for nti
Reconsideration should be filed with the City On Or before 10 days after
the effective date Of the City Council ordinance. I
Commissioner Clement moved that the following Resolution be
adopted:
• THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON
RESOLUTION NO. CC88-129
RE: POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL - Chapter 5.44
County Procedures for Review of Annexation Proposals
and Impact Reports
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 31-12-108 and 108.5,
municipaes are required to provide the Board of County
Commissioners a copy of the resolution inating annexation
proceedings, the peon, the published notice and an
annexation impact report; and
WAEREAS, procedures are necessary to review the proposed
annexation for conformance with ihe Municipal Annexation Act of
1965, as amended, and for impacts which may be caused by the
proposed annexation; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the
County Procedures for Review of Annexation Proposals and Impact
Reports which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit "All, and desires to adopt same; and
WHEREAS, this Board finds that the adoption of said procedures
is in the best interests of the health, safety, welfare and
morals of the'citizens of Jefferson County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said procedures shall be effective
from the date of adoption of this resolution.
y M
DATED: F ebruary 8 1988
t. k 9 -D *4 -1 r-l = rf-