Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-97-7The City of ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION. ~]Vheat ~Ridc~e Department of Planning and Development S 7500 West 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-: Phone (303) 237-6944 Applicant. S/1~ Yl~. /,t~,'~~~'..~nS Address ~ ~5 ~ P.~. N?~.~r/~ Phone yjf"Z~/`j Owner Address Phone Location of request ~, y JG Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed beloza_._. which pertain to your request.) ^ Change of zone or zone conditions Variance/Waiver ite development plan approval Nonconforming use change Special use permit Flood .plain special exception Conditional. use-permit Interpretation_of_code . Temporary use/building permit Zone line modification Minor subdivision Public Improvement Exception Subdivision Street vacation 8 Preliminary Miscellaneous-plat Final Solid-waste landfill/ ~] ** See attached procedural guide mineral extraction permit for specific requirement: ^ Other Detailed Descriptio o£ request SC'G~.l!; ., .4 » c n. List all persons and companies who hold an interest in the=described real-_ property, as owner, mortgagee, lessee,-o ptionee, etc. NAME ADDRESS ' PHONE ~1 ~ L ' ~d rn (,.~, llr4~.,~ also w N2 s ~~ .u. l3!-ZS ~t~~,w /9 _. n a .roo ST. 3 A-.vk. fGoo B 2 .a o in ~ r~~~~ ~G I • Z!I f s,/ ~ ~.u: 5~.ff ads) I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and- correct to the:..best-of:,my_knowledge..,and- tha_t in,_£iling this application, I am acting with the knowledge and .consent o£ those .persons Listed_aboye,__, without whose consent the requested_acti or. cannotlaw£ully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner. which approved of .this action on his be lf. Signature o£ Applicant ~~ Subscribed and s ~,' t 's da of 19 y_PUbl' SEAL My commission expires- ~~~~~ i Date. Received ~' ~/ - 1'1" xeceipz rvo. 7e~-i-U i,a5c ~~~. ~~ LAN D S U R V E Y I N G 5460 WARD ROAD • SUITE 160 ARVADA, COLORADO 80002 (303) 420-4786 IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE Attn: , 'U Scale: I"-20' 3/20/97 85.00 97-796 DATE FEE JOB# JEFFF..RSOPd CO. 6Lti~.a, MORTGAGE CO. 6150 W. 42PdG AVE, ADDRESS BORROWERS NAME WILLIAA7S LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PERCUENTI 1 LOT 18 IPdaALLS TERRACE BUEGIV~SICd'd, COUPdTY OF JEFFEFiSOPd, STATE OF COLORADO I___ J Csa ~ ~ow~ ~~_oo iJ `:c`~. o. ~ '.v .. ~ ~ 'lry.~ Q N O~V ~- STD~Y ~ N t~2ZGf~ ~ ,o g-p f ~, SFFCd ............: GD.tJC I wood :...........:....... ti p .... Wool] ....... Low t 8 M~ 4 ...' ~~~- az ---~f : ti Noce suflvErlsDwwxuslxo vurreoANatES Ofl EEAflINOSAND dMENDIOND. On the basis of my knowledge, Inf^^yopprmttation a or Improvement Survey Pfa~~lid"tRa~'it Ei improvement lines. I further certify that connections, are entirely within the bound) described premises by Improvements on an sign of any easement crossing or Burdening "NOTICE: According to Colorado !aw you mu first discover such defect. In no event, mayany a~ the certification shown hereon." ~iZ-Od , .. .. . ._....L q I v v r~ v ~ O JN J O ~ ~. ., sr"t~'''~ I ~~ „ I ~ ` __- elief, I hereby certify at th(s improvement location ce Ificate s prepared for ,that R I not a La d Survey Plat t'to be relied u n for the establishment of fence, uilding, or other future improvements on the above described parcel on this date, a cept utility of the paccel, except as shown, that there are na encroachmen upon the ioining premis s, except as indicated, and that ther9 is no apparent evidence or part of said p rcel, excep~~~11 p Edllgp~~ / mmence any! al ac6'o i~"• ~ 6f~in this survey within three yel3rs after you fspsed upon any efeci i~ial.'~y{~M~~~y'~ more than ten years fror~r the date or ~ ~ 92 '? D 38, 44' , II z ' i 12' 22' 4' 0 _..--~ ~ PRDPER'[Y LINE ~ - - - - - - - (-off -a -~ '"'-~ ~ z °z o II D z ~ ~ ~ ~°+ I~ BACK YARD ~ m I cn cn ~ o ~ m" ~ If I m m y I D ~ m ~ ~I v { I_L=~ee~ f I ~ a? ~ PORCH _ _ ~ m ~ I _ I ~ w I ~ 4 I ~ N ~° J ~ y ~ ~ I ~ ~ o r ~ ~ Z s [- n I m -N-I - ~ ~ ~ (n ~ ~ O ~ ~ m N ~ C r<*i ~ TPo~ W w ~~o ~ i N_ ~ \ \ _ ran _ _ _ _ ~ Q SIDEWALK & CURB Y vl ~~. WEST 42nd AVENUE -.__- -- - - - Y.- .- _ _ ~~ m~ ~~ .1 ' 1 i D q '_-~ Z - N -' m -t r D ~ 3 3 8" N G1 D D G7 m ,;, \ fTl _ ~r u m D o ~ O Z N N a N ~ . N ~ ~ fTl 0 -r ~ jfm~ ~ ~ °' I ~o< ~ S ~~ m~m~ z ~ r .. m ~m~> f ~K C)Ny '~ D o°'m o N 5D5N V! m ocz ~ D ° omm ~ y I W° ~ G7 <'' m f~i N VI L +J N~~. ~ N m ~ W w as ~ W N ~ W 1 W P ~ ~ I W m in 7' w 8'-3" N r I ~ ~~ rn. ~~ ~~ r r m N ~ Ir 1r i I t r I I r r I I ~~ r r I I 3'-6" 3' 8._3.. 4'-r NOTICE OF PIIBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held before the wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment on April 24, 1997, at 7:30 p.m., at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the public hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: 1. ease DTO. WA- 7-6 _- An application by Jim McCoy for approval of a 4' sideyard setback variance to the required 5' sideyard setback. Said property is zoned Residential-One A and located at 3475 Estes Street. 2. Case No. WA- 7-7: An application by Jay M. Williams for approval of a 18' variance to the 30° required side setback adjacent to a public street. Said property is zoned Residential-Two and is located at 6150 W. 42nd Avenue. ~s u ~ ~ ~C~ Mar u Chapla, Secretary ATTEST: .. -- Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be published: April 4, 1997 Wheat Ridge Transcript CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT T0: Board of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: April 24, 1997 DATE PREPARED: April 17, 1997 CASE NO. & NAME: WA-97-7\WII,LIAMS- CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of an 18' sideyard setback variance to the required 30' sideyard setback, when adjacent to a public street. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 6150.. W. 42nd Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S) Jay Williams 6150 W. 42nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S) Same APPROXIMATE AREA: 8,924 square feet PRESENT ZONING: Residential-Two PRESENT LAND IISE: Residential Single Family SURROUNDING ZONING: TL7:, ~;, ,~;, and $: Residential-Two SURROUNDING LAND USE: W:, g;, ~;, and $: Residential single family DATE PUBLISHED: April 3, 1997 DATE POSTED: April 9, 1997 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT; April 9, 1997 AGENCY CHECKLIST: ( ) (XX) NOT REQUIRED RELATED CORRESPONDENCE: ( ). (XX) NONE ENTER INTO RECORD: ( ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (XX) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (XX) ZONING ORDINANCE (XX) EXHIBITS ( ) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ( ) OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. Board of Adjustment Staff Regort Case No. WA-97-7 I. REQUEST Page 2 The applicant is requesting approval of an 18°_ side yard setback variance, to the 30' side yard setback requirement for the proposal of a 22' X 31', two-car garage. If approved, the two-car garage will be 5' -_ from the rear property line and 12' from the east property line. According to Section 26-15(F) of. the Wheat-Ridge Code of Laws, a detached garage built in the Residential-Two zone district must retain a 30' minimum side yard setback, when the side yard abuts a public street. Currently, the property does not contain a garage or carport; therefore the applicant parks his vehicles uncovered on the south portion, of the property. II. CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria to evaluate an application for an adjustment: 1. Caa the property in questioa yield a reasonable return in use, service, or income if permitted to be used only under the coaditions allowed by regulation for the District in which it is located; and, Yes. If denied, the property may still be used as a single-family residential. .The applicant does have area on the. property to park his vehicles. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to uaique circumstances; aad, Yes.- Although the property is relatively square, the existing 1,254 square foot single-family dwelling is placed in the middle of..the property (apparently due to setback requirements). Because of this, there is no development potential on the west property line, and development in the rear of the house would require the removal of an existing. porch and play area. Board of Adjustment Staff Report Case No. WA-97-7 Page 3 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality; aad Yes. Approval of this variance-would allow for the only structure placed within 30' of Ingalls Court. All of_the other properties in the neighborhood have structures built to comply with setbacks. Yet, enclosure_of the current parking area would aesthetically improve the surrounding neighborhood. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape, or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the ownerD as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out; and, No: As stated before, the property is a typical square site, located in relatively level area of-Wheat Ridge. Therefore, topology does not create any type of hardship. 5. Would the conditions upoa which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoaing classification; and, Yes. Anyone may apply for the same type of .variance, but the outcome may not be the same. Variations are reviewed on a case by case basis. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon the desire to make money out of the property; and, No. The variation is exclusively based upon convenience, and creating an additional enclosed parking space. 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship bees created by any person presently having as interest in the property; sad, Yes. The applicant, who has interest in the property, has created his own difficulty or hardship. Board of Adjustment Staff Report Page 4 Case No. WA-97-7 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvemeats in the neighborhood in which the property is located; and, No. Because the applicant currently accesses parking space on the same side of the property for which the garage is proposed, there should-not be any harm to the public's health, safety and welfare. This location for parking has proven safe in the past. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially iacreased the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially dimiaish or impair property values within the neighborhood, and No. The applicant, although requesting a variance for setbacks on the east property line, will develop the proposed garage to comply with the rear setback requirement. Therefore, the property to the south will not be adversely effected. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above, that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, a s distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? If the garage is permitted, it may benefit the neighborhood by allowing for the existing parking space to be enclosed, thereby creating an aesthetically pleasing look to the property and the surrounding neighborhood. Also, because the proposed structure is a single story addition, there will be adequate provisions for a person with disabilities. _ _ __ ~~ -q1-~1 ~X~ ~ ~~ Cathy and Ralph Cocozzella 119.54 w_ ZSth PI. Arvada, CO 80005 To whom it may concern April 21st, 1997 This letter is to inform you that we are the homeowners of the properly at 4167 Ingalls Ct and that we have no opposition to Jay Williams building a garage on his property located at 6150 W. 42nd Ave. If further information is needed you may contact us at 425-9375. Thank you ~~~~~ Cathy ocozzella Ralph Cocozzella ~ ~ O ~ £ v ? o a ~ ~ ~' ~ a ~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `'\ o ~1 w s ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ o w t ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ro 0 a ~ ~ o p o a ~ v. ~. P tr- ~ t+- ~. ~. p o F N' ~, o M ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~. - a F`a ro ~ ~ =P_ R -a ~. ~. ~ ~ ~- ~ p P N- ~~ ~ ws~- ~ ~~ ~e~ QC_ r~ ~ ~~~ ., ~~`~ W~ e ~~ ~~~ ~~ . ' 1 Q t~f`l ~ ~~ OEEIGI~L ZONING MAP WHET RIDGE coLOlz~Do MAP ADOPTED: Juno I5, 1994 Last Revision: October 10, 1996 J -ZONE DISTRICT BOUNDRY PARGEL/LOT SOUNDRY fDE516NATE5 OWNERSHIP) + DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES f ~ARTh~TlT OF Po.F1NllNG MD DEVELOPMFNt -235-2852 - - - ! L:\DRAWINGS\PLANNING\OS\SW24 ~~ ~~- s a eo un~+w scALe ~~~~ P.O-BOX 638 _TELEPHONE: 303/237-6944 The City Of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 60033 cWheat Ridge April 9, 1997 This is to 'inform you that Case No. WA-97-7 _whgch is a request for approval of a 18' variance to the 30` required sideyard setback adjacent to a public street for property zoned Residential-Two for property located at 6150 W. 42nd Avenue will be heard- by the Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT in the Council Chambers of-the Municipal Complex, 7500 West 29th Avenue at 7:3'4 1?. M,_ ,_on April 24, 1997 All owners and/or their legal counsel of -the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the BOARD Or ADJUSTMENT. As 'an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any -other persons whose presence is desired at-this meeting. if -you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division. Thank you. PLANNING DIVISION "Tlzc~ Ca.~°rt:ation City" ~ 4 1 ~I .t-. '-F; ~: _ .:~ . ,~ ,~ oz 11 >~i' ~.s ., _ w `s. n. y.~,~,~rC~ VJ 0 e.,: w s d ~ ~ N "~ a m w '~ w ~, ~ p Z .~ . ~ ~ Q . ~ ~ ~~ W m ,. ,_ ~, o ~.+ ~ a m r C~'d ~ v ~~~ ~ m ~ ~ U' W ~ ~ _ ~ Q S 3 'SS3tlOOtl NklN13tl dO lH`Jlii 3Nl 013dO13AN3 d0 d011tl H3210145 30tl1d _ llNtllkiOdWl - - -- F o ~ ~ o ~ 6 c A y 1L il\ ' I V Y 6 ~ ;F y V ~ i ~ ~~ ~~I N w c ~ G 6 •111. _s w~ U4 ° a~ ~ ~ G ~ ~~ c0 N o w as N; d ` a z w wz j a~~ LLw= ~~ v~ ~~- ~' T w =° ~ x a Fa ~ o u F ~ ~ ie ~`~ z a ~ Z ~~~ N, ~ d ~~ .~ 62'C E_ 'Lh x_96_ C ~ J (y'~'i'°'~1 ~~ ~`~' / ~/® Il •~', J/ Q 7 ~°a ~3 0.e ~! x/a~s. U .` m m N 0 0 ro O a +I _ ~ _:_ _ ~ .._ ; ~~ l - ~. _ ~ O i ~ 1---._ __ -__ __._..._. -Sa f~ - -_. ~ _ ~..... a.~ T ~ o W O O V' O N ~. (D ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ d ~ j IMPORTANT P 960 413 127 ~ 1y f~ 31 9 m c T -91 ~ .P 960 413 134 i 0 i ~ ~ S~ N ~ G fQ -~ ~ g m m m ~ - m c f C7 L ~ m y Z 1 -P 960 413 125 Y ~ m v ti ~ ~ ~ 'n (O S ' a m ~~~ _ 3 ~ c ~ TQ iy J `~ ~~ ~. ~ m 4 f== ~ ,~ ~ 2 P 960 413:135 m a~~ I Z ~ ~m~ ~ -i ~ m ~ z ~ u~ IIl ~}Q.~ ~ a ~ 8 ~~ ~ LLA• 99 o~ 'z am ~ ~~ o m~O '" z Y 92 > m m; m o „p m o m tm 9 !!!I i zm m z 0 ~ QQ~ ~ ~ n a ~ Q A ° =~ 1 r-o I Ko ~I iI \ 1` ` ~~ 3 ~C "{ °a m " 1 'CKER A7 TOP OF ENVELOPE 70 " OF RENRN AD_ ORES_S. ~~ __ ._ -.- _ _ _ ~.s-. ~ ~ ~ ~1 "-;. ~ m ~, ~ A _ ~ ~ m ~ ~ S ~ ~. ~ . ~ ~ , t_.. W m a J ~ m m_ - _ s ~ , Y~ a ,._. ~ M 4K Q ~ `° -ffi a ~ 1,.. ~ ~ ~. ~.~` "" _. Q ~ r' 'O O n ,• ~'7 •. A rt ;.: G Q • (n m n P'' ,L` ^ '~ t~rr n~- gm.x D o ~ j" m 3 G N A y 9 DS d ~. ry ~ ~ a g v F o u o F ~ ~ ~ ~m ~~ w ..` :"N 3 ~ b"D o ~ Q m ~ = ~~ ~O mm a B ~~.. w 3 D O d F. ~ 4 ° =a' a= F o Ha f ~ ~ ~ il.. .y- ~~ ~~_ ~l m 3 ~,~ ~ ml . =~ ;aT3 ~ ~.. f. ,3 ~3 I za' SN F g ~_ ~ F 2' _ 3 y '~ o ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ° ~ H s f d P Q °i 3 ~ m ~ r__ 'o ~ ~a dx ~ m ~' ~° 3 ~ 3 z - a m % ~ ~ ".~+ T y ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ N N -+ O -~ ~ y ~ ~ C7 ~c ~ ~ y ^ ~ ~ ty ' '' C a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m .~-. ~ D ~ o __ r z _ a ~ ~ -i .~ m a m a g _ ~ yw T ~ y _ ~ ~s a o ~ ~ oy ~~ a Wiz. ~~ .____ 8i ~ o n ~ ~ 4 m ~ m .x.s m m w ~ 9 .P 96D 413 130 { ~ _.. ..._'..._... ~ ~ - - w.. ~ 3 I ff ~ ` KKKKKK ~ 3 ~ a ~ ., ~' ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ m ~ It n T '"_ 3 ~ . f -P .960 4.13 128 ( T ~, `~ ~, • •- ~ z ff ~ _ y0 ~ = ~ y ~. aw£•~• ~•°Rtt~ ;P 960 413 7,33 !~_ _ ~ m ~' ' ~ °' T X rS' n r y~~ ~f Q~ ~ n ~ T o ~ N ~` n - =P 960 413 126 ~~ ~ z _ w :: _• •N 1 y w Ui H J~ °~ ~y Z 4 ~° ~. .. .a" ~_~ _ X Chi .. '~ ~ c _ ~ _. J] ~ Ul m ~ m -~H~ < , 2 9 0 ~ ~.. ~ fil c m c ~ t 6~ ~. - _• 'm ~ 3 p ~ ~ Ow Cy ~ m ~ ~ ~~ .. ~ ~ W ~" U ~` + n 3 ~ 3 3 tI w =i~~ b ~~'-~- a ~ ° a ~v O ~ ~ ° S ~ w~O ~ I[..i30_.. ~ Z ~ 3 ~ ~ fL $+ w TLt c~ m 3 f - -~_ ° A~ og~ m o~ I ~ ^^_~.p_ 'S r ~~. ~z 00 ^GO' ~! s ° ~ i E ~ w H C w ~ vm z ~ my I~ ~~~ ^~ ~~ ~ m C!1 ~o m `m 1 ~~-~ G ~' p ~ y' zm m p o ~ m° a R W ~~ n~ ~\ C~~ 4\ ~ F 3 0 f~ ~ w ~m y 3~ ~ { ~ W ~ ~ L~' ~ m v ~ 3 a E ~~ 3 n ~^ ~~ ~ Q Z 6 m ~~ n N r O D l ~ N ~ i n m ro ~ ~. (~ a~ a,~-'7~Da m~ [ ~ ~ °~ ~~ C nm- T W 3 ~° m -° Q7-rt c~ ~ m m m n ~. oN ~. 3Q m ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~Djm ~ rt ~ N y m [[ o: I ~ IMPORTANT! PLACE STICKER Ai TOP OF ENVELOPE TO ~ _.. _~____ ~ !_ ~ THE RIGHT OF RETURN ADDRESS. p -_ - - _ d _ _~ __ wra•gh•~. . ,. ** cooz ** coo2 Arline J ITe Gooyer Edna C Toohey 4170 Jay ST 4180 Ingalls ST- Wheat Ridge CO 80033-5021 Wheat Ridge CO 80033-.5127 ** 0002 Elmer F Carson 6275 W 42nd Ave - Wheat Ridge CO 80033-5142 ** C002 ** C002 Edna Viola Regester Michael J Parsons ** C002 6190 W 42nd Ave 6155 W 42nd Ave Jay M Williams Wheat_Ridge CO 80033-5144 Wheat. Ridge CO 80033-5109 WheatWR~dge COe80033-5144 ** C002 Martha O Olson ~~ ~„~„~,~~ .(31'~Gtv~~ ~~~~~~~~ 6135 W 42nd Ave L(1_'1Q ~~.t(frkj„~ ~,,~,, IIR~~-# blI 7r7~^ f L Wheat Ridge CO- 80033-5109 ~~~, ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST CASE N0: WA-97-7 DATE: REQUEST: An application by Jay M. Williams for approval of an 18' variance to the 30' required side setback adjacent to a public street. Said property is zoned Residential-Two and located at 6150 W. 42nd Avenue. Position On Request; ~ ; (Please Check) ; i SPEAKER'S NAME ~ ADDRESS (PLEASE PRINT) i IN FAVOR i OPPOSED ~ T / /~~~ ~ ~ ., - i (~~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ i i i i ' i i i i ~ i i i i ~ ~ ~ __ - i r`_ ~ ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i ~ - , - ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ _ ; - i i ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. - ~ - ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ' ~ i i ~ i.. ' i i ' ~ i ~ i ~ ~ - ~ ~. ~ _i i i i i ~ i i i ~ ~ i i ~ i i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i j -- ; - - ~ i ; ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i i i i i i ' ~ i i ' i ~ ' ~ i ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i i v ~ ; WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINIITES OF MEETING: May 22, 1997 Page 3 Mr. McCoy said-there is a well on the right side of his property and on the other side the house is 38 feet from the proposed garage, so-he feels this is the best locat$on. Mr. M Coy explained .the roof-line break and said the style. will be a Dutch. Gable. He submitted his plans nd gave a brief exp anation. Chairman HOV wanted to know if there wee other options, and Mr. McCoy .tated behind his house to t e southwest is his patio, and acing the garage there ~j°uld impact the view of .the moun ains and close everyth ing in, plus he would also have to acre the garage from W.~Sth Avenue No further questions were asked. Motion was made-by Boar`_ Member BOTT that Case No. WA-97- 6, an application by Jam s McCo be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The neighbor to the soy. h has a 22' sideyard setback from the property lin f c mmon with the applicant. 2. Alternative locationtoie north or backyard did not seem to be reasonab e or of ective. 3. The neighbor most ffected-bmitted a letter in favor of the applicant's proposal. 4. The garage addi ion may benef the neighborhood by allowing for t e existing parki g spaces to be enclosed and creating aesthetic look ~ the property. WITH THE FOLLOW~'NG CONDITION: 1. The gar e addition shall be built as"`~described in the drawi submitted to the Board. Motions seconded by Board Member ECHELMEYE~ Discussion follow regarding the aesthetic look for the neighborhood. Motio carried 5-0. Resolution attached. B. tease No. WA-97-7No. WA-97-7: An application by Jay M. Williams for approval of a 18' variance to the 30' required side setback WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, MIND'TES OF MEETING: May 22, 1997 v -' > Page 4 adjacent to a public .street. Said property is zoned Residential-Two and is located at 6150 W. 42nd Avenue. Sean McCartney presented the staff report. All pertinent documents were entered into record, which Chairman HOVLAND accepted. Board Member ABBOTT figured the setback variance would only be 4 feet if the applicant built a single car garage and faced it on 42nd Avenue, and Mr. McCartney agreed and said that would bean option. It was noted there were no objections registered regarding this case. Mr. McCartney added the required setback of 5' will comply on the south side. The applicant, Jay Williams, 6150 in. He entered into record three stating no objections to this request, labeled Exhibit `A' Mr. Williams said he is trying to aesthetically. Most of the house; attached garages, but also are on basements. He said his frontyard is small, and the house is set in position. If_he lines .the garage lose light from three windows. W. 42nd Avenue, was sworn letters from neighbors improve the lot s on the block have higher ground and have is gigantic, the backyard a really peculiar up with the house he will Board Member ABBOTT was concerned with haw far the applicant will be from his neighbors to the south fence line, and Mr. Williams answered 5 feet-. Board Member ABBOTT thought this was larger than a standard two-car garage, and Mr. Williams explained that the proposal is for a two-car garage, but part of the diagram also includes the covered walkway. The exterior will be siding with-the corners being two-tone brick. A brief question and answer period ensued regarding tying the roofline and breezeway into the home. Mr. Williams .spoke on covenants. ~ _ Board Member ABBOTT thought the garage was not attached and Mr. Williams assured him it was attached, and talked about - a ~, *. '~ WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT MINIITES OF MEETING: May 22, 1997 Page 5 the setbacks and landscaping. The applicant also told Chairman HOVLAND he needs the 5' to maintain the back of the garage and to keep his trash cans from view. Board Member ECHELMEYER questioned the elevation of the plans submitted being incorrect, and Mr. Williams agreed and said when they are revised-he will submit them to the building department for review. No further questions were asked. Motion was made by Board Member ABBOTT that Case No. WA-97- 7, an application by Jay Williams, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The dwelling has no garage. 2. An attached garage will be impractible and cost prohibitive. 3. Two vehicles historically have been parked uncovered in this proposed location. 4. The garage may benefit the neighborhood by allowing the existing parking spaces to be enclosed, thereby, creating an aesthetically pleasing look and general improvement to the property. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The setback to the south shall meet the ordinance. 2. Exterior siding shall include brick as described by the applicant. 3. As described by the applicant, the north wall shall include a porch and windows, the northern garage wall shall be vegetated, and the structure will include a breezeway. Motion was seconded by Board Member MAURO, and carried 5-0. Resolution. attached. • w - 7- An .application b ilding Center fo frontyard setback variance to the 50' yard setbac r or the construction fenced storage yard. The property is i WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT MINIITES OF MEETING: May 22, 1997. Page 6 Commercial-Two and Light Industrial zone districts and located at 5026 Ward Road. Sean McCartney presented the staff report. All pertinent documents were entered into record, which Chairman HOVLAND accepted. If this 15' setback is approved, there will be a 2250 square foot landscape variance added to this request. Board Member ECHELMEYER questioned why the limit on the lumber only being stacked 6' high, and Mr. McCartney stated in the zoning ordinance-the screening of-material must be with a 6' fence, and no storage shall go beyond that height. Discussion on restrictions ensued. It was noted the applicant currently is in violation of two ordinances - (landscaping and outdoor screening). Board Member ABBOTT feels there will be no benefit to the City or citizens by granting this variance because the applicant is required to do the landscaping and screening anyway. The triangle shaped piece of land south is owned by the Burlington Northern Railroad. Chairman HOVLAND was concerned with sight triangle encroachments from the drive to Ward Road, and Mr. McCartney replied the sight requirement on driveways is 15' x 15' (measured from flow line), so if the fence is 15' back, they are out of the sight triangle. The Board discussed lessening the setback request and the regulations that apply. , n ~~ No further questions were asked. The applicant, Lee Jordan, 14470 W. 56th Place, Arvada, CO, was sworn in. Mr. Jordan submitted a plot plan for review,; labeled Exhibit `A'. He said the property in question for . this storage had old trucks, storage sheds, semi trailer, backhoe, metal drums, etc, and was in a state of disrepair; and an eyesore to the neighborhood. The old house on the property was demolished and then-went into receivership: "" Mr. Jordan bid on the property, and paid a high price for - it, as the lumberyard had no opportunity to grow. He talked on his remodel and said they want as much usage out of the land'as possible. ., ~ R-w CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Mary Lou Chapla, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 22nd day of Ma„v ,.1997. CASE NO: WA-97-7 APPLICANTS NAME: Jay M. Williams LOCATION: 6150 W. 42nd Avenue Upon motion by Board Member -ABBOTT seconded by Board Member MAURO the following Resolution was stated. WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an Administrative Officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application,-Case No. WA-97-7 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an Administrative Officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the required 15 days by law and there WERE NO protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-97-7 be and hereby=is APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 18' side"yard setback FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The dwelling has no garage. 2. An attached garage will be impractible and cost prohibitive. 3. Two vehicles historically have been parked uncovered in this proposed location. n i. _ • ' Case No. WA-97-7/Resolution Page 2 4. The garage may benefit the neighborhood by allowing the existing parking spaces to be enclosed, thereby, ~~ creating an aesthetically pleasing look and general improvement to the property. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The setback to the south shall meet the ordinance. 2. Exterior siding shall include brick as described by the applicant. 3. As described by the applicant, the north wall shall include a porch and windows, the northern garage wall shall be vegetated, and the structure will include a breezeway. VOTE: YES: Abbott, Echelmeyer, Hovland, Mauro, and Walker NO: None DISPOSITION: Variance granted by a vote of 5-0 DATED this day of May 22, 1997. BF~IIL HOVLAND, Chairman Board of Adjustment Mar} of Chapla, Secretary Board of Adjustment