The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3181 Pierce StreetFrom: no-reolv(alci.wheatridae.m. us To: CommDev Farm is Subject: Online Form Submittal: Roofing Permit Application Date: Friday, October 8, 20213: 13:24 PM Roofing Permit Application THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PERMIT. DO NOT BEGIN REROOFING UNTIL PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. Is this property Residential Commercial or Residential? How many dwelling Single Family Home units are on the property? PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address 3181 Pierce Street Property Owner Name Gene Bark Property Owner Phone 310-636-4602 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123- 4567) Property Owner Email Field not completed. Address Do you have a signed Yes contract to reroof this property? CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Business Endeavor Exteriors Name Contractor's License 160159 Number Contractor Phone 720-536-8870 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123- 4567) Contractor Email production@endeavorexteriors.com garage? Etc) SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I assume full Yes responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application. I understand that this Yes application is NOT a permit. I understand I will be contacted by the City to pay for and pick up the permit for this property. I understand that work Yes may not begin on this property until a permit has been issued and posted on the property. I certify that I have Yes been authorized by the legal owner of the property to submit this application and to perform the work described above. I attest that everything Yes stated in this application is true and correct and that falsifying information in this application is an act of fraud and may be punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. Person Applying for Alex Knoll Permit Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. Address Retype Contractor Email Address Attach City of Wheat Ridge Electronic Payment Form - "DO NOT ATTACH A PICTURE OF A CREDIT CARD" production@endeavorexteriors.com DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL SQUARES of 16 the entire scope of wo rk: Project Value (contract 5670 value or cost of ALL materials and labor) Are you re -decking the No roof? Is the permit for a flat Pitched roof (2:12 pitch or greater) roof, pitched roof, or both? (check all that apply) What is the specific 8/12 pitch of the PITCHED roof? How many squares are 16 part of the PITCHED roof? Describe the roofing Asphalt shingles materials for the PITCHED roof: Type of material for the Asphalt PITCHED roof: Provide any additional Main dwelling only detail here on the description of work. (Is this for a house or j 111111111!l 111�1 I �11111 l� r I! I I !I IT! 111111 Fill 02 011"M - I -- -------- -- =0 Occupancy Is Not Permitted Until A Certificate of Occupancy Is Issu—ed- Protect This Card From The Weather Inspections will not be performed unless this card is posted on the project site. Call the inspection request line before 11:59 p.m. to receive an inspection the following business day. maim Inspector Must Sign ALL Spaces pertinent to this project Foundation Inspections itspector Initials Comments Monolithic Stab Reinforcement Concrete Encased Ground (CEG) UndeLprouTdISla $pact r Initials Comments Electrical (Underground) ewer Service (Underground) Water Service (Underground) .... . .... ... I III# FlAzil MOT i F-1 Rough Inspections Insp actor Initials 4111111, - 'I Lath/ Wall Tie N011 MI. Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Gas Piping 27 1 uw�==M Rough Framing IIS Final Inspections Initials Comments Final Electrical Final Plumbing inal Mechanical Landscaping & Parking :'fanning Dept. 0 Fire Inspection Fire Protection Dist. j 111111111!l 111�1 I �11111 l� r I! I I !I IT! 111111 Fill 02 011"M - I -- -------- -- =0 Occupancy Is Not Permitted Until A Certificate of Occupancy Is Issu—ed- Protect This Card From The Weather FEB/23/2016/TUE 12=47 PM PAX No, P,002/002 MAAMI"IN it •. Building Division 7500 W, 2eAve., Meat Ridge, CO 8013 InspectionOffice: 303-236-2855 * Fax: 303-237-8929 303-234-5933 Facsimile BuildingPermitApplication fiF M.:. Address. M EM= " s w; a •- s � � ♦ fie, x � •a a .� „ mt ... � ••. i^e t ... t itt. `.♦ t ". i" ,.4.t ♦ ..: ., # ♦• i . i wt ..R • t y .. u : k., t. .. n S '. r ,: �,:. , `:R at .t. ,.S :t t" ♦.. a R.. x i... `t t " ! .:: ♦ » f a ^. .. to t ! �;." " "" tM.` r t.• tt' °, • . , a.�' Jt` .i�: �' +iR Aaka,,,r „i +(�� I � ,, Y�+W, � ukM�'�� City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department Memorandum TO: Accounting Department FROM: Melissa Mackey, Building Division SUBJECT: Refund for Permit DATE: October 14th, 2008 Reason: Renewable energy refund for permit #080807 at 3181 Pierce St. (refund letters also attached if they could be sent with refund check). Please refund Contractors License$ 100% permit fee: $ 100%.plan review $390.40 100% use tax: $576.00 Total: TO: Colorado Electric Works, Inc 8031 Fox Ridge Court Boulder CO 80301 Thank You! (acct 01-510-00-513) (acct 01-510-00-516) (acct01-550-05-551) (acct 01-500-02-505) $966.40 M Mme, Permit Technician City of Wheatdge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. October 14, 2008 Colorado Electric Works, Inc. 8031 Fox Ridge Court Boulder, CO 80301 Dear Colorado Electric Works, Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 As a result of policy changes enacted by the Building Division on October 2, 2008, to promote the installation of renewable energy systems in the City of Wheat Ridge and uniform application of SB 08-117, aggregate fees for residential solar installation permits in the City of Wheat Ridge have been capped at a maximum of $500.00, including all use taxes and permit and plan review fees. In response to this policy change, the Building Division has retroactively applied this policy to permit number 080807, purchased by your firm on 07/21/08, which has resulted in the enclosed refund check in the amount of $966.40. We trust that you will continue to promote renewable energy systems within the City of Wheat Ridge and look forward to working with you again in the future. Cordially, ohn chumacher, Jr., CBO Chief Building Offi cial 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2853 Fax: 303-234-2857 www.ci.wheatrid eg co.us City of eatdge MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT co CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. w,ivw.ei.wheatridge.co.us . v s m o N o 'o o m ~ ^ ._o 7 y N -0 ~ ~ m . m m v CD a { m ~ ~ c n ,.i ~ N ~ ~ ~ .d.. 0 w w a ~ w ❑ z 0 0 =3 m < N w Q m 0 D ~ ~ ~ C- 0 c a a A N N 3 'a CD r: c 0 c ~ m Z N lu m n 1 Z Z O n m 5., \ w W W W ~ cn a ~ W 7 < O C, N V ~ 0 m ~x ~ r3 ~a i - ,a<c i ~ Pt ~ n n . ~ 5S tTf:D; ~ (t 1~{1£1rQ'`~ ~ + Q . : y~ ~y ~ rc MM~AT~.Ff~: ~ /~p M~~~e~~~'~q ~ ~17lOlIIy~BGi A kW ~C~HY ~ 8'y'8t~111 'P~1'"YOC~ r: k & Lt§.riah:Newton 06-0205 CaioxadSY'`1~c~~.~ ~t+l~ tTSIR: UA sr.ocx/urr#: ~ V ~~t v ~ Y a! 4 C tY"J 1A.aa ~'Y .d'k ES'SIMT$p mJEC`3' StALtTATT~N . 3'2.D$&~ E .rAd0.00 re IX,~~'~~~~ 576 09 . 1,466.4Q - ~ . . ~ u . , Y , , . . ,,•S e ci3mply w3th 200S NEC. $ubjBet.,tki P~~~ . ` ~ . . , . . . . . . . . . ..t _ , . d2Ct h [8'edi~tl W~C#1 C~PXOVneian6 tet ~px'ih 4n Ybk+T aj*Sid1461% . pnd : >I " Rq~~Ony en4 euf7.difig kbdee oE NkeaL8idge. .ColaradoF~ iys frony~tiie=,tsaue aSaee..~. Baqueska #4F an exteoeton uvet'hm rei n[ea at Yhe~tlSBei`ationo4 „he Builtliag ofEic3a1. 8U9p0iYelosi'OiaklaRdalmeht eXCqBOH.ADC f1T ~e 0ipxi.idaGe 0£ the bnildingcodee esauiV othL+t oLtl3hsnGe, `i#iP Ytu'~B.Aid? d 1ae~eCQlr~ini. " . eate .k . ..........,,.w ...a,.i~+ , , ._,qxM1Mr,~.,.. , s. y,. . . . . F,,.~,,.~ . . . 4 4' City of Wheat Ridge - ~ Residential Electric PERMIT - 080807 PERMIT NO: 080807 ISSUED: 07/21/2008 JOB ADDRESS: 3181 PIERCE ST EXPIRES: 01/17/2009 DESCRIPTION: Install flash mounted 4 kw solar system on roof CONTACTS owner Bark gc 303/444-6562 Ray & Dinah Newton 06-0205 Colorado Electric Works, Inc. PARCEL INFO ZONE CODE: UA USE: UA SUBDIVISION: UA BLOCK/LOT#: 0/ FEE SUMMARY ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 32,000.00 FEES Residential So1ar 500.00 Plan Review Fee 390.40 Total Valuation .00 Use Tax 576.00 TOTAL 1,466.40 conditions: JS: Approved as submitted. Must comply with 2005 NEC. Subject to field inspection. . I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulationa of the Ci[y of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of zecord; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accura[e; that I have read and ayree [o abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume Eull esponsi ility Eor compiiance with the wheat Ridye 2uilding Code (I.B.C) and all other applic~j4eJp'ky5~at Ri~ge Ord;Zuylic ,wojplc under this permiL ~Flans subject to field inspection. 1. This permi[. was issued in accordance with the provisions set forth in your applicaeion and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoaing Regulations antl Building Codes of wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the City. 2.Thie permi[ shall expire 180 days from the issue date. aequests for an extension must be received prior to expiration date. An extension may be gran[ed at the discretion of the auilding Official. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a Eee of one-half the amount nornally required, provided no changes have been or wi11 be made in the original plans and specifications and any suspenaion or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes have beev or if suspension or abandonment ezceeds one ;lj year, fuli fees shall be paid for a new permit. 4. No work of any manner eha11 be done that wi11 change the na[ural Elow of water causiny a drainage pmblem. 5. Contractor shall notify the Building Inspector twenLy-four (aa) liours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspection card before proceeding with successive phases of the job. 6. The issuance of a permit or the approval of drawings and specifications shall not be mnstrued [o be a permit for, nor an approval. of, a~~ ~y7ation oE the provisions of the buil.df.ng rodes or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. All plan rev w ~b7ect to field inspecCions. of C]fjfef Hlfildina Official date INSPECTION RBQUEST LINE: (303)234-5933 BUILDING OFFICE: (303)235-2855 REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 3PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. ~ .r h k r z• ~ ~ 4'F ti rt j. . ` t, d'M . d ~ N " ~ . ~ . ka { r krc, yh d . . , , : y, - . . . r. x.-.~~ Height to top of array 30 feet max. Based on house Area of array 14.2 Based on panel dimensions " (squarefeet) ) (32"x64 Wind loading 36.1 Assumes: Directionaiity=l, Kx=.98, Kxt=1 (psfl Total wind loading per panel 513.0 Calculated per ANSI ASCE-7-02 (pounds) Wind Anchoring System: The standard racking system uses 1 5/16" diameter lag bolts driven into the rafters or the top chord of any trusses. These lag bolts have a safe working limit of 1,000 pounds per fastener in hem-fit, doug-fir is higher. This allows a safety factor of approximately 2. The feet need to be anchored with a minimum of 1 5/16"-shank diameter lag bolt driven a minimum of 1-1/2" of thread depth into the rafters. Details: rafter ~ Unirack I~ Roof rafter or Top Chord ol tmss ~J Unirac: One lag bolt per connection point 77 ~ ~ ~ - 7901 S. ADAMS WAY LITTLETON, CO 80122-3601 303-221-1559PHONE CONSUP°ER@MACCOM zl- dr ~ SHARP RESIDENTIAL SYSTEM MODULE 167 WATT POWERFUL. ATTRACTIVE. RELIABLE. POLY-CRYSTALLINE SILICON PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE WITH 167W MAXIMUM POWER Sharp's ND-167U7Y photovoltaic modules offer industry-leading performance and aesthetics. Designed for use specifically with Sharp's Solar Racking System (SRS),these residential modules give the clean, attractive appearance of a high-tech skylight while the black anodized aluminum frames and trim strips blend beautifully with the home's exterior. Using breakthrough technology perfected by Sharp's 45 years of research and development,these modules incorporate an advanced surface texturing process to increase light absorption and improve efficiency. Sharp's ND-167U1Y modules are the perfect combination of technology and aesthetics. Thelaminatedglassmoduleisglazetl Sharp'sresidenfialmoduleswithblackhames intoahigFforsionblackanadized andrcimstripsareideolforpeokrooh,and aluminumlrame. allowfortheseam/etsintegrationo{the syshm inro the home i design. RESIDENTIALSYSTEM MODULE CeIlTemperawre: 25'C Cell Paly-aystalllne silicon No. of Cells and Conneclions ae in series ~ Open Circuit Volta9e NoU zv.oav ~ Mazimum Power Voltage (Vpm) zz.trv Short Circuit Current (Isc) ~ e.oaA Maximum Power Current (Ipm) 7.27A Ratetl Power (Pmax)* 167w (+io=r, i-s Module Effciency (qm) 12.7=r, Maximum System Volta9e aoovoC ~ Series Fuse Ralin9 isA Type ot Output Terminal Leae Wire wim MC Connecror (STq Standard Tes[ Conditions: 25°C,1 kW/m', AM 1.5 9 8 J 6 a 5 4 3 2 1 0 180 160 1W 120 100 3 80 ~ 60 40 20 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Volta9e [V1 167 WATT rv~ ~ a . ~ ~ [unenln.Valtage - Powv n.VOtla9e A B C 0 E F G Current, Power vs.VOltage Characteristics svauzamm 11 .rn14mm zzVmsmm uv-oa.m 3ea-rvlamm 21-a11mm avnUoomm Oesign and sDe<if ca[ians are subjea m chanqe without natire. Sharp is a registered [rademark of SharO Carporation. All ather trademarks are properry af their respective awners. Sharp takes no responsibiliry for any defe<ts tha[ may ottur in equipment using any Sharp devices. Contaa Sharp ro obtain the larest pmduct manuals he(ore using any Sharp devi<e. SHARP, 4111W SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION • 5907 Bolsa Avenue, Huntington Beach,CA 92647 i, Tel:1-800-SOLAR-06 • E-mail: sharpsolar@sharpusa.com • wwwsharpusa.wm/wlar (overphoto:Solarinstallation by PremierPawerNenewable Energy,EL Dorado HiIIs,CA 02007 Sharp ElectmnicsCorporation.Allrighb reserved. SESG-167U1Y-607 Prinred in the I15A SHARP SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE LIMITED WARRANTY Sharp Electronics Corporation warrants to the first consumer purchaser that this Sharp brand product (the "ProducY'), when shipped in its original container, will be free from defective workmanship and materials, and agrees that it will, at its option, either repair the defect or replace the defective Product or part thereof with a new or remanufactured equivalent at no charge to the purchaser for parts or labor for the period(s) set forth below. This warranty does not apply to any appearance items of the Product nor to the additional excluded item(s) set forth below nor to any Product the exterior of which has been damaged or defaced, which has been subjected to misuse, abnormal service or handling, or which has been altered or modified in design or construction. In order to enforce the rights under this limited warranty, the purchaser should follow the steps set forth below and provide proof of purchase to the servicer. The limited warranty described herein is in addition to whatever implied warranties may be granted to purchasers by law. ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR USE ARE LIMITED TO THE PERIOD(S) FROM THE DATE OF THE PURCHASE SET FORTH BELOW. Some states do not allow limitations on how long an implied warranry lasts, so the above limitation may not apply to you. Neither the sales personnel of the seller nor any other person is authorized to make any warranties other than those described herein, or to extend the duration of any warranties beyond the time period described above on behalf of Sharp. The warranties described herein shall be the sole and exclusive warranties granted by Sharp and shall be the sole and exclusive remedy available to the purchaser. Correction of defects, in the manner and for the period of time described herein, shall constitute complete fulfillment of all liabilities and responsibilities of Sharp to the purchaser with respect to the Product and shall constitute full satisfaction of all claims, whether based on contract, negligence, strict liability or othervvise. In no event shall Sharp be liable, or in any way responsible, for any damages or defects in the Product which were caused by repairs or attempted repairs performed by anyone other than an authorized servicer. Nor shall Sharp be liable or in any way responsible for any incidental or consequential economic or property damage. Some states do not allow the exclusion of incidental or consequential damages, so the above exclusion may not apply to you. THIS WARRANTY GIVES YOU SPECIFIC LEGAL RIGHTS. YOU MAY ALSO HAVE OTHER RIGHTS, WHICH VARY FROM STATE TO STATE. Product Model Number & Descrii)tion: NT-SSEtU, NT-185U1, NT-180U1, NT-RSE7U, NT-175U1, NT-170U7, ND-216U2, ND-216U1F, ND-208U2, ND-208U1, ND-2081.11F, ND-205U7, ND-200U2, ND-200U1, ND-2001.1117, ND-187U2, ND-187U1, ND-187U1F, ND-181U2, ND-181U1, ND-181U1F, ND-167U1Y, ND-167U2, ND-1671.11, ND-167U3, ND-167U3A, ND-167U7F, NE-1701.11, NE-Q5E2U, NE-165U5, NE-1651.11, NE-160U1, ND-162U2, ND-162U1, ND-162U1F, ND-1601.11Z, ND-160U3, ND-L5E1U, ND-LSE1UF, ND- 125U2, ND-125U1F, ND-L3E1U, ND-L3EJE, ND-L3EJEA, ND-L3EJEF, ND-123JEF, ND-123UJF, ND-60RU1, ND-62RU1, ND-62RU1F, ND-62RU2, NE-80E1U, NE-SOEJE, NE-80EJEA, ND- SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION Sharp Plaza, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430-2135 SHARP QOE21J, ND-N6E1U, ND-N2ECU, ND-N2ECUF, ND-NOECU, NE-K12511.12, ND-72ELU, ND- 72ELUF, ND-72ERU, ND-72ERUF, ND-70ELU, ND-70ERU (Be sure to have this information available when you need service for your product.) Warrantv Period for this Product: The warranty period for material defects and workmanship is one year from date of purchase. The warranry period with respect to power output continues for a total of 25 years from date of purchase, the first 10 years at 90% minimum rated power output and the balance of 15 years at 80% minimum rated power output. This warranty is transferable when product remains installed in original location at the time of product warranty registration. Additional Item(s) Excluded from Warranty Coverage Warranty coverage does not apply when: a) the Product is improperly installed, b) the Product is installed in a mobile or marine environment, subjected to improper voltage or power surges or abnormal environmental conditions (such as acid rain or other pollution), c) the components in the construction base on which the module is mounted are defective d) extemal corrosion, mold discoloration or the like occurs. Where to Obtain Service: What to do to Obtain Service: Warranty service is available at a Sharp Authorized Dealer located in the United States. To find the location of the nearest Sharp Authorized Dealer, call Sharp toll free at 1-800 SOLAR06 (800-765-2706). Call toll free at 1-800-765-2706 to obtain a Return Authorization Number and shipping instructions. Proof of Purchase will be required. Ship prepaid or carry in your Product to a Sharp Authorized Dealer. Be sure to have Proof of Purchase available. If you ship the Product, be sure it is insured and packaged securely. Sharp will not be responsible for the costs of de- installation or reinstallation. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION Sharp Plaza, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430-2135 FRONIUS IG GRID-TIED INVERTERS FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS Light Weight At 42 Ibs, the FRONIUS IG inverters are the lightest grid-connected inverters making them both easy and cost-effective to install. More Energy MIX'"' Concept allows your system to output more energy under part-load conditions. Lower Cost Integrated UL approved DC & AC disconnects which reduce installation time and complexity - often eliminating the need for additional disconnects. LCD Display User-friendly and comes standard with every FRONIUS IG; tracks more than 20 critical system performance parameters. POWBCfUT At 4000, 4500 and 5100 watts, these inverters deliver more power output for higher performance installations. Reliable Fronius has been in business for over 60 years and has more than 200,000 FRONIUS IG inverters installed woridwide. Warranty 10 year Premium Warranty. i POWERING YOUR FUTURE pC kout pay ' FRONRJS q 4000 fflQWUB Ki'ICD RRONA 08 41100-LY Recommended PV power ~Max. DC input volta e 3000-5000 Wp _ 500 V „ 4000.-_6300Wp_ 500 V 3600-5500 Wp 500 V O rating DC volta e ran e 150 - 450 V 150 - 450 V 150 - 450 V Max. usable DC inWt curreM AC Output Drla.. Maximum output ower 0400 C 26.1 A . F710NRJ8104000 4000 W 332 A FRON11761G 6100 5100 W 29.3 A FPA)WU$ 16 4EOR.IY 4500 W Nominal AC output voltage Utili AC voka e ran e 240 V 272 - 264 V(240 V+10%/-12%) 208 V 183 - 227 V . Maximum AC cuvent 167 A 21.3 A 21.6 A Maximum utility back feed current 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A ati f uenc ran e Oper 59.3 - 60.5 Hz (60 Hz ram) ; Total onic distortion harm _<_5 % rPower Facto~ (cos phi) tixr~raf D~h ~h Max. etficienc I FHdNNJB p4WO FNONIUB Ni 61D0 400,1.Y 952 % 95.2 % 94.4 % Consumption in stand-by < 0.15 W(ni ht) Consumption durioperation 75 W Enclosure Size(Ixwxh) Wei ht NEMA 3R 284x185x8.8in (720x.418x223mm1. . 42 Ibs. 19 k Ambient temperature range -5 to 122 °F (-20 to +50 °C) Cooiin controlled forced ventilation Int rated DC and AC dixonnects standard UL ap ved DC 8 AC disconnects PrabclWm Ground fault protection _ Internal GFDI, in accorUance with UL 1741 DC reveree larit rotection Internal diode Islandin protection Intemal, in accordance with UL 1747, IEEE 1547 Over temperature Out ut ower deratin Su e Protection Intemal DC 8 AC protection. Tested to 6 kV . Safet UL 1741 EMI Anti-Islandin protection Ground fault detector and interrupter FCC Part 15, Class A& B UL1741, IEEE1547 Compliant with NEC Art. 690 requirements, UL 1741 mmosowwwo Maximum AC over currant protection AC wire sizin 7wapole, 30 A circuit breaker Use maximum AWG 6 194°F (90 °C) copper wire OC wire sizing Use maximum AWG 8 194°F (90 °C) copper wire AC disconnect 32 A DC disconnecl Wananry . 40 A 10 year Premium WarranTy is Standarcl / ralux Fronius USA LLC Solar Electronic Division 10421 Citation Drive Suite 1100 Brighton Mi 48116 Power Systems . . ♦ oblJen e1 Allmw. [eawnm.n~m sownmt Phone:810-220-4414 Fax:810-220-4424 E-Mail: pv-us@tronius.com www.fronius-usa.com ~ ~ / POWERING YOUR FUTURE Fronius USA Premium 10-Year Warranty (Applies to all invertew shipped from Fronius, USA as of January 1, 2007 forward) FRONIUS IG Solar Inverter Models: FRONIUS IG 20001 FRONIUS IG 2500•LV/ FRONIUS IG 30001 FRONIUS IG 40001 FRONIUS IG 4500-LVI FRONIUS IG 5100 The Fronius Premium 10-Year Warranty now comes standard on the solar inverter models listed above offering the straightForward protection and support that Fronius customers have come to expect from the industry leader. At Fronius, we have been designing and manufacturing high quality power electronics equipment for over 60 years. And all our production facilities are ISO 9001 certified. You will probably not encounter any service-related issues with your FRONIUS IG Solar Inverter. However, in the unlikely event that within Ten (10) years from the original purchase you discover a problem caused by defects in either workmanship or materials, we will see that it is either repaired or replaced. Repair or replacement depends on Fronius' evaluation of the issue and what we decide makes the most sense according to the situation. The warranty is based on the inverter's serial number, allowing the warranty to be transferred to another owner if the FRONIUS IG Solar Inverter remains installed in the original installation location. Because the warranty is tied to the serial number, there is no paperwork to transfer the warranty to a new owner. The FRONIUS IG Solar Inverters are designed to withstand normal operating conditions and typical wear and tear when the FRONIUS IG Solar Inverter is used for its original intent, in compliance with the FRONIUS IG Installation and Operational Manual(s) supplied with the original equipment. This warranty does not cover damages by improper installation or operation, misuse, abuse, manipulation, alterations or repair attempts, accidents, fire, floods, acts of God, and incidental or consequential damage caused by defects with other components of the solar system. This warranty does not extend beyond the original cost of the FRONIUS IG Solar Inverter. Any Fronius inverter that requires a warranty replacement within 180 days of shipping from Fronius - typically at least 90 days from the inverter and system commissioning - will be replaced by Fronius with a brand new inverter as standard policy. To obtain service please follow the service process below: Fronius service process for warranty returns and repairs: Obtain a Returned Merchandise Authorization (RMA) o All returned FRONIUS IG Solar Inverters require an RMA. o Call Fronius USA Technical Support at 810-220-4414 to obtain an RMA. • Technical Support is available Monday through Friday, excluding holidays, from 6:00 am to 6:00 pm PST. o There is no papervvork involved on the part of the installer to obtain an RMA as all information required will be obtained during the phone call. Fronius USA Premium 10-Year Warranty Page 1 of 2 / POWERING YOUR FUTURE Steps and information required for the RMA application: o Contact with a Fronius Technical Support Representative at 810-220-4414 to evaluate and troubleshoot the issue while the inverter is in the field, as many problems can be fixed in the field. o If troubleshooting does not fix the problem, the following information will be required by the Technical Support Representative for the RMA application. The representative will collect this information over the phone: 1. Model and Serial Number of the FRONIUS IG Solar Inverter 2. Detailed description of the problem including the Inverter's diagnostic codes 3. Shipping address for the warranty replacement equipment 4. When the replacement inverter will be required Once the RMA has been issued: o Fronius USA will ship a replacement inverter ahead to the installer within the time specified as per point #4 above. Fronius will prepay the shipping costs. o When the replacement inverter arrives and is installed, the installer simply places the defective inverter into the box from the replacement inverter. • Apply the included UPS call tag to the box and call UPS. • The defective inverter must be returned to Fronius USA within 14 days of receiving the replacement unit or a charge may be applied for the replacement. • All FRONIUS IG Solar Inverters authorized for return by Fronius USA must be returned in its original shipping container or packaging providing equal protection. Warranty period for any repaired or replaced inverter: 12 months after shipment from Fronius USA or the original remaining warranty period, whichever is greater. Service reimbursement: A$90.00 service reimbursement will be issued per qualifying RMA. Further details of this program can be found in the document Service Reimbursement Terms & Conditions. Damage caused by shipping or mishandling: Visually evident damage caused by shipping or mishandling is to be reported to the shipper as soon as possible. Shipping damage is the responsibility of the shipper, not Fronius, and should always be so noted with the shipper prior to accepting and signing for the product. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or consequential damages. This warranty gives you specific legal rights, and you may also have other rights, which vary from state to state. Fronius USA, LLC General Terms and Conditions also apply. Additional Information: Contact Fronius, your local dealer, or your Fronius Distribution Partner for additional information on the Fronius warranty. Additional resources may also be found on the Fronius USA web site, www.fronius-usa.com, including information on service assistance, online training, accessory service issues, product information, or operation. You may also contact Fronius at: Fronius USA LLC - Solar Electronics Division Phone: 810-220-4414 10421 Citation Drive, suite 1100 Fax: 810-220-4424 Brighton, Michigan, 48116 Fronius USA Premium 10-Year Warranty Page 2 of 2 Q POINTS Tty CHECK WHEN SELECTING THE INSTALLATION IOCATION 2.2 C#IECKING'fHESQkAR POWER SYSTENIINSTJtCLA'I1QN LfKA?ION CODE COMPLIANT INSTALLATION 1. Determine the wind loads for the installation site. Check with your local building and safety department for the specific requirements. 2. Make certain that the roof structure can support the live and dead loads resulting from the installation of the PV array. 3. Consult with a professional engineer if additional assistance is required. 4. Determine the basic wind speed from the IBC wind speed chart (for US locations). 5. Determine the exposure category A through D (obtain latest definitions from IBC or local building code). 6. Determine total pressure by compiling basic wind speed, exposure and roof height. Check with Sharp technical support if your total pressure exceeds 45 PSF. 7. Reference the chart wind speeds to determine your design wind pressure (PSF). Determine exposure categories A through D for various roof heights. 8. Based on the loading in step 7, make certain that the roof structure can support the load. 9. The modules and system are UL listed to standard 1703. The UL 1703 test is performed at 1.5 times the design load of 30 Ibs per square foot, or 45 Ibs per square foot. The system has been load tested by Sharp to 50 PSF. Building departments often require a design safety factor of 1.5 or greater for structures. The maximum structural loading listed in this guide does not include an added safety factor. 10.To achieve maximum load capacity, use at least the same number of sliders as modules on each rail. BASIC WIND SPEED SPECIFIED BY IBC IBC Wind Speed Chart W 20061nrernational Builtling Code • Basi[ Wintl Speed (3-5econd gust) 11 Lowtion Vmph (m/s) 1. Valuesare neminaldesign3-secontlgustwiiWSpeeasimmiiesperiwunmis, (4)) at33k.(tOm)abovegroundforExpoSUre CCaregory. Hawaii IDS Z. LinearinrerpolationbetweenwinCronIDUrsispermined. PuerroPico 145 (65) 3. IslandsandmastalareasouKidethelastmnrourshallusethelastwindspeeE Guam 170 (7fi) mnmur of the coastal area. Vir9inislands 145 (65) q, Mountainousrerrain,gorges,oceanDromonrorie;andspecialwintlregions American5amoa 18 (56) shallEeexaminetlbrunuzualwintlcondieionx. INSTALLAT10N WORK 5:3 iNSTALl:1MG THE QP'fIONAL FLASHiNGS Flashings can improve water and ice management on the roof by directing the water around the rail slider assembly. It is intended for use in new construction, re- roof, and in locations with significant precipitation. The flashings are installed under the standard slider assembly. Each flashing is similar in size to the slider assembly. The flashing has a large flange around iYs perimeter to allow for integration with the surrounding shingles. There are 3 alignment marks on the Flashing and identification for the orientation of the part. 1. Confirm the locations of each standard sliderassembly. Follow the same rules for installation as the slider foot. The flashings located on the bottom rail (close to the eave), should be aligned with the chalk lines created in the roof layout. Flashings used to supportthe center rails should be centered on the rail line. The flashings located at the top rail (close to the ridge), should have minimal exposure beyond the rail. Rahercenrerhne ~ Bottomedgeofthe moduleslayoutline ~ ~ Bottom edge ofsliderfeet layoutline ~ 2. Dry fit the flashing in the location marked for installation. Use a utility knife to cut the surrounding ~ shingles to assure a flush and water resistant fit. ~ Install flashing over a layer of shingles to insure water resistance. 3. Invert the flashing, peel off the protective backing paper and apply a bead of roofing silicone along the top and sides in the flange area. Leave the bottom flange clear for water drainage. When shingles are cold, they become brittle and are difficult to work with. Use a putty knife to lift the shingles and slide in the flashing. Bead of :ircone //7//4. Apply a bead of silicone on the top and sides of the flange that contact the surrounding shingles. Press the area to create tight seal. Bead of roofing ~ silimne (under shin9les, on top of flashing) , ~ 5. Peel off the backing paper from the standard slider. Place the standard slider assembly on the flashing and secure with four (XA58) 110mm flashing screws. The arrow on the flashing should point down to the eave side. Install flashing over a layer of shingles to insure water resistance. 23 st.t •!t , ry u o~ u 9 c e , o c z": w::E 03 wCD w' 0 A p IW O W O 7 N S ~ < N Q N N 7 ~ N a CD ~ 0 J ' (D (D ~ 0 3 ~ C- 0 Q a a N N N n 0 ~ ic ~ C 0 ~ Z ~ ~ (D W o 0 m . W cn 0• w ~ < m • o,~ r O Z ~ cNn 0 " ~ z 0 y -I (D ' v ~ M Building Permit Inspection Log Page 1 Building Permit Number : 14722 3181 PIERCE ST Ins ected T e of Ins ection Approved Remarks 1/23/2003 FOOTINGS (permit in port. toilet) OK/BG 2/3/2003 CONST TEMP METER OK/BB METER REL. 2/10/2003 FOUNDATION card in san-o-let OK/BG 3/4/2003 WEATHERPROOFING OK/BG 6/13/2003 6/13/2003 6/17/2003 RP GAS PRES TEST RP DIS/BG 6/18/2003 RP OK/BG 6/19/2003 RM OK/BG 7/25/2003 RE ok/dm w/note 8/22/2003 RF okok/bg 9/312003 INS locked/bg 9/4/2003 INS. (LOCK BOX G.D.B) OK/BG 9/8/2003 DWS (LOCK BOX G.B.D) OK/DM 1016/2003 FE dis/bb door locked 10/6/2003 RE-garage dis/bb not ready 10/7/2003 E-SERV (LOCK BOX G.D.B) ok/bb emr 10/31/2003 GMR DIS/CCI NO PRESSURE 11/1412003 GMR (LOCK BOX C.A.B) DIS/DM 11/24/2003 GASLINE (GMR) (LOCK BOX C.A.B ok/dm gmr 1/13/2004 FM (LOCK BOX C.A.B) OK/DM 1/16/2004 FE (LOCK BOX C.A.B) dis/cci gfci- kitchen 8 furnace room 1/26/2004 CAISSONS ok/cci 1/26/2004 RE (LOCK BOX C.A.B) ok/cci 1/28/2004 FB (COURTESY'DARIN* 9:00) DIS/DM 1/28/2004 ROOF OK/DM PARTIAL 2/6/2004 FB `DARIN' (2:00) DIS/DM 11 Page 2 Building Permit Number : 14722 3181 PIERCE ST Ins ected T e of Ins ection A roved Remarks 2/9/2004 F-PW OK/DFB I N. DRIVEWAY CONNECTION AT FUTURE TIME & PERMIT 211912004 FB (IOCK BOX C.A.B) ok/cci ~ ~ID Vi~~ - Oftk ~ ~o ? • ~ ~ No Kv'Cs~~ 1 1,6 k a6oa~ S o ~C,".' lb=cc > LJIC,~+ 0 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge February 20, 2004 OFFICIAL ADDRESS NOTIFICATION NOTIFICATION is hereby given that the following address has been assigned [o the proper[y/properties as indicated below: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Gene & Mar aret Bark 1616 Secrest St. Golden CO 80401 OLD ADDRESS: Vacant NEW ADDRESS: 3181 Pierce Street Wheat Ridpe CO 80033 SUBDIVISION: Barths Subdivision LOT(s)2 BLOCK 2 PARCEL NO.: 39-264-01-004 NOTES: 11 AUTHORIZED BY: DATE: 2- zd ' d~~ DISTRIBUTION: 1. Property Owner 2. Jefferson County Assessor, ATTN: Data Control, 100 Jefferson County Parkway, Golden, 80419 3. Jefferson County Mapping, ATTN: Addressing, 100 Jefferson County Parkway, Golden, 80419 4. U.S. Post Office, 4210 Wadsworth Blvd., Wheat Ridge, 8003 5. Xcel Energy, A"I"I'N: Correspondence, P.O. Box 840, Denver, 80201 Qwest Communications, Attn: Shirley Campbell, 12121 Grant Street, Room 601, Thomton, CO 80241 7. Comcast, Attn: Jon Alvino, 6793 W. Canyon Ave., #13C, Littleton, CO 80128 8. Water District: Consolidated Mutual 9. Sanitation District: Wheat Rid e 10. Fire District: Wheat Rid e 11. Wheat Ridge Planning Division 12. Wheat Ridge Building Division 13. Wheat Ridge Police Department 14. Log File 15. Other: NOTE: Please notify all other parties concerned. ADDRESS MAP UPDATED BY: DATE: "The Carnation City" pppARiA4Xf OWPV9LK WOA1C3 DATE: /o oy DEVELOPMENT INSPECTION REPORT ENGINEERING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LOCATION: 3/H / pi~CE ST' TIME: /a=/SP~ WEATHER: i~ CAp Y 30 '"-,/d S INSPECTION TYPE: PRE-BUILD CONCURRENT FINAL DEVELOPMENT NAME: GENERAL CONTRACTOR: SUBCONTRACTOR: SUPERVISOR: SUPERVISOR: GENERALCOMMENTS: oIvA Y ~a. s.•/ 6~v.O oF ,D.e.vEtuay INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR: PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR: CO'.VTRACTOR: SUBCONTRACTOR: DATE: L11°10 DATE: DATE: Rev 7/03 %~ic ~.v To sT,ef~7 ComFN,E TE,o s~FAi Cirzc:,AA2 De vtf- wav Com~.rEr,E-o 14 r 7-Ni.s v ~ W w~ O 3 W (D w~ > 0 o i~ i~ i n i O 7 N S ~ < m s m m =3 3 v a m ~ C1 0 A ~ N o m ~ r. 0 ~ d c- 0 a n a a ~ ~ N N n r~. u on Mi m n r4L ~ Z O !"h C~0 (D ~ N 'a (D 0 = 03 w ~ N ~ N ~ W 3 N ~ ~ v G N 0 ~ n 0 ~ ~ C Z v C m r ~ 3 m ~ v m -v -i N m ~ 0 , v w~ ~ wm N~ w~ A 0 ~ w~ ~ W O 7 ~ N S 0) (D 0' N N :3 3 m a m ~ m ~ o - y m ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 aa a ~ N N `v 0 O ~ C ~ Z 0 ~ O ~ n o ~ 0 = tn m 0' W ~ < m ~ N 0• r ZOO CA y O E .-f r m <Z 0 0 ~m v ~ w~ O 3 wCD N 7 w0 ~o ~ tNG fD W n W O 7 N 3 < N Q fD N 7 SU a CD ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ N a (D ~ 0 ~ ~ 1- C- 0 v a a m N N n 0 0 ~ C 0 ~ Z ~ - ~ (D ' o v O W~ N~ m ~ • r Z w ~ ~ O v i y ~ 0 o m C Z M o v ~ m -o ~ 0 ~ a 0 E o ~ ~ 3 O n C ~ 0 t ~ ~ ~J (D w s N Q 0 Z 0 ~ m~ ~ m 'a d f1 O <D o < 1 m ~ o ~ ~ Z o m (D m ~ , . o ~ c < p a ~ pi M m Q ~ y (D < C- c ~ i (Dd r !C p ~ O n w m 3 C 7 S aw .d+ a a ~ 0 0 f~ IG o s ~ * "y N O 7 ~ N ~ ~ O rt ~ ~d ~ 3 a O ~ o ~ (D ' ~ ~ d • N N N O 7 < a 5 '11 W =N D N N m W ~ m ~ C v ~ Y, m D ~ 3 Z The Rocky Mountain Water Company P.O. Box 507 Golden, CO 80402-0507 Phone: (303) 277-6780 February 3, 2004 Mr. Darin Morgan City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29~h Avercue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 RE: Residence t 3181 Pierce Stireet, Vl~eat Ridge Deaz Mr. Morgan The purpose of this letter is to inform. you that I have inspected and approved the final construction of the residence being built by Mr. Gene Bazk at 3181 Pierce Street in Wheat Ridge. Mr. Bark has met all of the construction requirements specified in the license agreement entered into beriveen the Rocky Mountain Water Company and Mr. Bark. Please contact me at 303-277-2334 if you have any queshons 1vlatthew J.Cook, P.E. Manager, Field Operations Feb-03°1074 12:39 From-COORS + T-466 P.002/002 F-560 The Rocky Mountain Water Connpany P.O. Box 507 Golden, CO 80402-0547 Phone: (303) 277-6780 February 3, 2004 Mr. Darin Morgan City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29`' Avenue Wheac Ridge, Colorado 80215 ItE: Residence at 31$1 Pierce Strect, Wheat Ridge Deaz Mr. Morgan: The purpose of this let[er is to inform you that I have inspected and approved the final construction of the residence being built by Mr. Gene Bazk at 3181 Pierce Street in Wheat Ridge. Mr. Bark has met all of the conshucrion requirements specified in rhe license agreement entered into between the Rocky Mountain Water Company and Mr. Bark. Please contact me at 303-277-2334 if you have any questions. Matthew J.'Cook, P.E. Manager, Field Operarions Feb-03•2004 12:38 From-COORS + T-466 P.001/002 F-560 . 1 7; Coors Brewing Company FAX COV ER SHEE7 /AND & WATERRESUURCES DELIVER TO' l~R-4cN ~l,[o2G~4tiJ SUBJECT: . o-~ Ras (~~.e C~ 3t8 l P,ex.cx %r DATE: NUMBER OF PAGES: (INCLUDING CO ~ PAGE) a LACATION: TELEPHONE NUM9EfR FAX NUMBER: 303 -z~s- Zgs~7 i :Wi 'ii ..i68bu.. r. tie.i^C.. ..e.'.v•:i: f i. FROM: .n.'ryp.: -0 a : 'i i' ' ii.wnp r. 'v. n. .n : n i 'i FAX N0. M 4'Lf e00GC 3031277•3833 iELEPHONE NUMBER: PLEASE CALL 277-6746, IF THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THI6 TRANSMISSION. COMMENTS; J_• ~ ga-iff T a 3 s ~ v Z ~ m 0 m ~ 2 N ~ ~ o ~ 0 C- Q n C ~ O A 0 m fA fJ ~1 3 ay CD a ~ a 0 w a N S p w ~ Q 00 a ~ ~o m a ~ , ~ o s . ~ * 3 0 y ~ CL ~ 0 o y4 7 ~ 0 ` N C ~ o ~A Z :r m ~ ~ °1 a 0 5 N O ~ ~ 7 ~ o ~ ~ a ~ tc ~ ; m < fD 3 n o d lu ~ N ~ , N fp O a 1 0 ,n o *v N D N ~co ~ M v m C ~ v ~ ~ m a ~ m ~ ~,4~~~ _ < l~ 9~~~0\~~.°;y; BARK RESIDENCE 3181 PIERCE STREET DETAI LS FOR STRUCTURAL FLOOR IN LI EU OF CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE BARK RE51DeNGE 57RUGTURAL gASEMENT FLOOR y~EAT RID6EEGOL A-0 N07E: PROVIDE 300 CFM FAN AND A MINIMUM OF 144 SQ.1N. VENT AREA. FAN, CONTROLLED BY NUMIDISTAT, T0 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4 AIR GNANGES PER NOUR. FINAL LOGATIONS TO PROM07E CROSS VENTILATION. nP. 3-13/4'xn7/e' MICR0.N9 1.4E - I ae Za II ~ o II m ~ II ~ II FLOOR FRAMING SCALE : 1 /8" = 1 - 0' Il 7/8° TJI/PRO 150 (or eqyal) @ 16" O.G. PLAN r Gp GEr,ED. ~ RAi•iP 1 ~ ~ 1 BARK RESIDENGC g7~1y~ gASEMENT FLOOR y,,~qTi RIDbEECAL~OR4DO A-I I 11 1 4 ii=I e a I I I . I I -I I I a. a ° e~ aa ~ a a d ~ 0 110 0 a - o • 0V G ~ B,^~I I;5 E--1 _;t 7 o- Eo o Oo ooo ooo 000 000 oUO 0 FLOOR FRAMING DETAIL - CONCRETE WALL - P.T. 2XI2 LEDGER W/ (2) I/2 " DIA. A. BOL7S @ 4'-0" O.C.1 4" MIN. EMBEDMENT SIM. N07E - P.T. 4XI2 LEDGER W/ (2) 1/2 " DIA. A. BOLTS @ 4'-0" O.C., 4" MIN. EMBEDMENT, W/ (4) BOLTS @ BEAM END 3/4" PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR 7J1 W/ SIMPSON IT7 NANGER ~ SIM. NOTE - LVL BEAM W/ SIMPSON GLTV NANGER MIN. 18 GLEAR CRAWLSPACE W/ PEA GRAVEL OVER VAPOR BARRI ER LEDGER/BOLT DESIGN fc' = 31000 psi T = 1,500 ibs V = 1,650 ibs Joist span 15'_0" DL = lOpsF LL = 40psF I W = 50psF(15/2) = 375p1F I Joist reaction = 50psF(15/2)(16/12) = 500 lbs 2x12 ledger will span 6'-0" R=1,125 lbs Use 2x12 p.t. ledger w/ (2) 1/2" pia. A. Bolts @ 4'-0" o.c. SCALE : 1 /8" = 1' - 0" I BARK RESIDENGC I ~ v,,,,.r4 STRUGTURAL 6P~`.EMENT PLOOR 3181 PIERGE STREET A.Z WHEAT RID6E, CALORADO gt COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTION LINE - 303-234-5933 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215 - (303-235-2855) Building Permit Number : 14722 Date : 10/28/02 Property Owner: GENE D. BARK Property Address : 3181 PIERCE ST Contractor License No. : 21508 Phone : 303-279-4899 Company : GENE D. BARK Phone : 303-279-4899 OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit applicalion are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or re9ulatlons of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditlons printed on this application, and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (U.B.C.) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge ordinan/ce~s, for work under this permit. (OWNER)(CONTRACTOR) SIGNED ~ ~ DATE ~ IO. O?j Construction Value : $180,261.00 Permit Fee : $1,447.35 Plan Review Fee : $940.78 Use Tax : $2,163.13 Total: $4,551.26 Use : Description : NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W/ DETACHED 2-CAR GARAGE BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY "WWOMAMM Approval : MP Zoning : R-2 ~~~400~ Approval: DM KI:~rx~°,,.~ ~nr.*;r.~~ W"R Approval : MJG Occupancy : Walls OK. 10/28102 OK PER COMMENTS. 10128102 SIC Sq. Ft. : OK. 10128/02. - PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS (ALSO PLAN SET) Roof : Stories Residential Units : Electrical License No : 18137 Plumbing License No : Mechanical License No : 17790 Company :Intermountain Electric, Company : Company : Four Seasons Heating Inc. Expiration Date : 4/8/03 Expiration Date : 2I28/03 Expiration Date : Approval : OKIKS Approval : OK/KS qpproval : (1) This permit was issued in accordance with the provisions set foAh in yopur application and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Cotle of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable orUinances of the City. (2) This permit shall expire if (A) the work authorized is not commenced within sizty (60) days from issue date or (B) the building authorizetl is suspended or abandoned for a period of 120 tlays. (3) If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a(ee of one-half the amount normally requiretl, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifcations and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changas are made or if suspension or abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full tees shall be paid for a new partnit. (4) No work of any manner shall be done that will change the natural Flow of water causing a tlrainaga problem. (5) Contractor shall notify the Building Inspector Rvenry-four (24) hours in advance tor all inspections and shail receive written approval on inspection card before proceediing "uccessrve hases of the job. • (8) The is SaWA of approval of drewings and specifcations shall not Oe construed to be a pertnit for, nor an approval of, any violation of the provision ( t bui es or an other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. Chief Building Insp ctor f WFEqr DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Building Permit Number. BUILDING INSPECTION LINE - 303-234-5933 Date: ~ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH AVE1V[TE WfIEAT RIDGE, CO 80215 - (303-235-2555) ~~C ORP~~ ~ ~~PLICATION . ~ ~..Properry Owner: 6e:-NW a rjA-ge 3n3. 27q •461111 `}1 Property Address: ~6)eC6 '-57- Phone :70d. 95L, e87mj Contractor License No.: / Company: Phone: OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE AND AGREEMEIVT I heroby cettify that [he setback dista¢ccs proposed by Nis pemut applicatlon aze accurate, and do notviolate applicable ordinanas, ruPu or regufations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenan[s, easemenis orrestrictioac ofrecord; ihata(1 measuremenis shown, and allegations made are accurate; ihat I have road and agree. to abide by all conditlons printed on this applicaHon and thffi I assume full rcsponsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridse Building Code (U.B.C) and e1( other applicable 4Vheat Ridge Ocdinances, for work under this permit (OWNERxCONTRACfOR):SIGNID~/~J~ ~DAI'E 0• I7• 0 Z Construction Value:"trI.- PernutFee:$ /Lfy-~. PlanReview Fee:$ `/~1~'• 1 ~ USC13X:$ Z'Ot31:$ Description: ~ ~ N G E ~~~-f~1F~t~ 2- GssyG G~GE ~fi ~ CL> ~ qq~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLC ZONING COMMENTS: Approval: Zoning: BUILDING COMMENTS: ( VZ Approval: PUBLIC WORKSCOMMENTS~~ lo/~/oZSEL^ Ana+2rApproval: eowwENrs [s~.so ~Occupancy: Walls: Roof: Stories: Residential Units: ;j Electrical License No: Iyj`-~~ Plumbing License No: ~~l Mechanical License No: Company: glka_~. Company: Company: Expiration Date: Expiration Date: Expirarion Date: Approva(: Approval: Approval: (I) 1tis permit was issued in aeeorda¢ee with the pmvivons set fo:th in yow applicatlon and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and ro the Zorting Reguia4ons md Building Codes of Wheat Ridgy Colorzdo or a¢y otha epplieable ordinauca of the Ciry. (2) 17us pamit shall expue if (A) tIU work authorized is not mmmrnced witLiu axty (60) days from issue date or (B) the building euNorized is suspended or abandoned for apedod of 120 days. (3) Ifthispeimitexpires,anewpwmiemaybeacqtiiredforafeeofwefialftlteamountnoimallyroquircd,providednochangesheve6eenorwillbemadein the originel plaac and sp<ci5cafions and any mspension ora6andonment 6es not exceeded one (1) yexr. ifdianges have be<n or ifsusprnsion nr nhnnAonmmt exceeds one (I) yeer, full feu shall be paid for a new pelmit. (4) No wock of any mmner shall 6e do¢e that will change the natural flow of wata cwsing a draiuage problem. (5) Contractorshall noEfytheBvilding7nspeetortwmty-four(24)hotvsinadvanceforall inspeceonsmdshaLLrecaivewritt<napprovaloninspecNoncardbeforc proceeding wiih sucemave phases of thejob. ' (6) Ihe issuance of a permit or the approval of diawings and speci5<atlons shall not be construed ro 6e a permit foq noc an approvai of, xny violanon of Uie provisions of the build'wg codes or euy otha ord'ma¢ce, law, nile or rogulation. Chief Building Inspector PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW FEE STRUCTURE FOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS Date Applicant Phone # 50 79- 46, 4 R Location of Construction Pvrpose of Corrstrucf'ron 1-~nN44-E _25-. or,~ c r Buhd'mg Permit Value -~P lB r Single Family ~ Commetcial Multi-Family DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES Development Review Processing Fee: AfIY06P g Jo o, oC.~ (for document processing) Single Family Residential Review Fee:~ g (for review of applicable technical.docum Commercial/Multl-Family Review Fee: For review of existing technical documents $100,00 $ For rev,iew of technical documents for construction in right=of-way, final drainage report and erosion control plan $500.00 $ Subdivision ImprovementAgreement Fee: $125.00 $ (for document processing and recording) pevelopment Covenant Fee• 5.Q0.- $ IZ~-,~". o 0 (for document processing and recording) CDOT Access Permit Fee: $100.00 $ (for document application and processing) Traffic ImpacE Study Review Fee: $100.00 $ (for document review and processing) Flood Plain Variance Review Fee: (for document review and processing) Ciass i applicatlon = $150.00 g Class I Publication/Public Notice = N/A Class II application = $250.00 $ ' Class II PublicationlPublic Notice = $90.00 $ TOTAL'REVIEW FEES: (due at time of building permit issuance) $ 275 • o0 PLEASE NOTE THAT IN AODITION TO THE ABOVE FEES, THERE WILL BE ADDITfONAL LICENSING AND PERMITTING FEES REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Signafure of Applicant ~ - 13 ~i Date i6, Z-Z-00 FJes on Enginent/Forms/Review Fees-Building PermitAp Rev 04/01 oF ~ T DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW " `°L oxP 0 Date: ' ° Location: 3ial P~e strzc-E~ -T Attention: Building Department I have reviewed the attached materials submitted in application for approval of a!S',dh, ~Fmcwpuez at the above referenced address. Please note the summary comments below. 1. ~i Boundary Closure: ✓ OK _ Not OK; refer to stipulations. 2. ~ Drainage: a. Drainage plan and report needed _ b. Drainage plan not needed C. Lot drainage/grading to be reviewed by Building Division ! d. Site drainage/grading provisions have been reviewed and aze: OK Not OK; refer to stipulations. 3. ✓ NPDES Pernvt Required: _ Yes ~ No 4. ✓ Public Improvements: a. street pavixg needed: Yes ✓ No b. curb and gutter needed: Yes ~ No c. sidewalk needed: Yes ~ No d. street lights needed: Yes ~ No e. storm sewer needed: Yes ✓ No f. letter of credit required: Yes ✓ No If a letter of credit is required, for what improvements? _ Amount of letter of credit: 5. ✓ Subdivision Agreement required: _ Yes No 6. _ Development Covenant req ed: ✓ Yes _ No . IfYes,forc+iess~4unsw fIJ.~.Lu.. io-Jrz. 7. ~ Traffic impact analysieport required: ~ Yes % No g, ✓ State Highway Access Permit needed: _ Yes ~ No 9. ~ New roadway or alley R.O.W. dedication recommended: _ Yes ~ No If yes, what is recommended? 10. ✓ All existing dedicated roadways/alleys meet the standazds of the City: Yes _ No If no, which do not and what is requested: 11. ✓ APPROVAL: The Public Works Depaztment has reviewed this request and hereby gives its approval, subject to the above and/or attached stipulations. Si natur Michael Gazcia Da1e 12. NO APPROVAL: The Public Works Department has reviewed this request and does not give its approval for the reasons stated: Signature Michael Gazcia Date ~ 13. ✓ Stipularions attached: ✓ Yes _ No Drz+yr--"7 -cm ~✓or -lb t-,,ce--n z4 14. ~ Summary Comments: Av~~ L;.ocbf io T-FfE,EwJn.vy P.aa« iM,1Ko./e3pA47-5 As 4 gr-S~cr oF>NiJ CoNSrevcr.o.✓ iS To r 'f^-4e«^ir To G~Tf STq.yOA"f ftivC TCJ G.O. /SSUa1fC.E. 4 LA..vAbE ~'~r~tdr,oN ~E~ rS RX-qvlRr-D J~krea To G.D• ~SS✓NNLE, Files on EnginenflForms\Bldpimi3.frm Rev 05/00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 7500 WEST 29T" AVENUE • WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215 FAX (303) 235-2857 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RESTORATION DATED ADDRESS .3W4 -T >rzizz-g Dear Contractor: In conjunction with the approval of the building permit application for the above referenced address, this letter is to inform you that all existing public improvements located along the frontage of said address shall be restored, (if damaged from related construction) to an acceptable condition, as determined by City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Deparfment, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to any construction commencing, the City's representative will conduct an onsite inspection to determine the existing condition(s) of the public improvements at this address. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2868. Sincerely, '>;~~.Y-~-.; Michael Garcia, Development Review Engineer cc: File Files on Enginent\Developmen} Review/Forms & form letters\Notification of PI Restoration Rev 05/00 G E N E D. B A R K A. I. A. September 23, 2002 Michael Garcia Development Review Engineer Department of Public Works City of Wheatridge, Colorado RE: 3181 Pierce Street The following comments and attached plan set is in response to review comments dated July 22, 2002. Thank you for your time in reviewing this matter. 1. The easements for the Rocky Mountain Ditch and the lateral are prescriptive by nature and do not have narrowly defined requirements. Please accept the attached signed plans, from the two ditches, as approval of the proposed development. 2. The site plan, Sheet A-1, is correct for the relationship of the garage to the house and property line. The foundation plan, Sheet S-1, does not show the correct relationship due to the size of the paper and the final drawing scale. 3. Per our conversation a Development Covenant will be executed just prior to receiving permit. tN&Ja.9 r 'ur 'fD Thank You, Gene D. Bark City of Wheat lticlge, ~',olorndo Biulding Division Plan Review Correction Notice Address: O,1vncr: Projcct: Dutc: 3181 Pierce Street - SECOND REVIEW Gene Bark Contructor: Owner New SFD September 30, 2002 ~y it;~ ~ I Ocxupancy: R3 / U1 Va►luution: $188,261 1. Address all redlines indicated on plans and resubmit redlines with resubmittal. 21/ Resubmit original building permit application. 3.✓ Resubmit a copy of soils report. q~iExecute and submit development covenant information. ~ Submit a recorded copy of the survey provided. 6!✓Wade Isham of Rocky Mountain Ditch has indicated to me that they have not given final approval of this project due to agreements needing to be signed. The elevation information submitted to and signed off y Mr. Cook does not match the information submitted to our office. Provide information on your plans related to the additional underground lateral located along your east property line. 8. Submit details and infortnation on your plans showing what portion of the RM Ditch is to be piped underground, have site plan and overiot grading plan reflect these changes. 9. Provide approval signature blocks from all ditch and lateral companies on the title page to verify each entity has reviewed and approved the proposed project. Please make these additions or corrections to the submittal and resubmit for review, if you have any questions please contact me at 303-235-2853. Darin I Codes Subsurface Exploration Program Geotechnical Recommendations Proposed Bark Residence, Wheat Ridge, Colorado Prepared for: . LEGACY PARTNERS 700 Seventeenth Street; Suite 500 Denver, Colorado 80202 Attention: Mr. Gene D. Bark Job Number 02-3083 ROU] ENGINEEFiING May 30, 2002 CONSULTFINTS 41 Tnverness Drive East, Englewood, CO 80112-5412 Phone (303) 2894989 Fax (303) 2894686 North Office: 7393 Da6lia Street, Commerce City, CO 80022-1834 www.eroundeng.com, TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Conclusions 1 Purpose and Scope oF S[udy 2 Proposed Construction 2 Site Conditions 2 Subsurface Exploration 3 Laboratory Testing 4 Subsurface Conditions 4 Foundation Recommendaaons' ' 4 : 6 F1oor System Foundation Walls and Retaining Structures 7 Water Soluble Sulfates 8 Underdrain System 8 Surface Drainage 9 Site Grading 10 Excavation Conditions 10 Closure and Limitations 11 Location of Test Holes Figure 1 Logs of Test Holes . Figure 2 Legend and Notes Figure 3 . . Typical Underdrain Details A Figure 4 Typical Underdrain Details B Figure 5 Summary of Laboratory Test Results Table 1 Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Colorado CONCLUSIONS (1) The subsurface conditions encountered in the test holes generally consisted of man-made fill overlying natural sand and clay. Bedrock was not encountered in the test holes to the maximum depth of exploration ranging from approximately 20 to 35 feet below the existing grades. Groundwater was encountered in two of the test holes during the drilling at a depth of approximately 20 feet. (2) Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the test holes and the nature of the proposed construction, we believe that the proposed structures may be founded on spread footings placed on either the on-site 511 materials or undisturbed natural soils, provided [he Owner is willing to assume the risk of potential differential settlement and structure movement due [o the variation in nature of [he fill ma[erials. (3) Footings for the residence should be placed on the existing fill atleast 10 feet below the existing grades to reduce the potential settlement, or placed on undisturbed namral soils encountered at a shallower dep[h. (4) Footings for the detached garage should be placed on the existing fili at least 5 feet below the existing grades, or placed on undisturbed na[ural soils encoun[ered at a shallower depth. (5) Footings placed on the on-site fill materials or undisturbed natural soils may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. (6) Based on the results of our field exploration and laboratory testing, slab-on-grade construction may be used for the floor system. However, considering the potential impact of ditch water to the building, the floor slab for the lower level of the residence should be placed at least two (2) feet above the botrom of the adjacent Rocky Mountain Ditch or the proposed wlvert pipe. (7) Additional geotechnical recommendations with respect to underdrain system and site grading are contained herein. Job No. 02-3083 Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Colorado PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This repoR presents the results of the subsurface exploration program and provides geotechnical recommendations for the proposed single-family residence ro be located near the intersection of West 32nd Avenue and Pierce S[reet in the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The project site is shown in Figure 1. A field exploration program was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Material samples obtained during the subsurface exploration were tested in the ]aboratory to provide data on the classification and engineering characteristics of the on-site soils. The results of the field exploration and laboratory [esting are presented herein. This report has been prepared to summarize the data obtained and to present our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed constmction and the subsurFace conditions encountered. Design parameters and a discussion of the geotechnical engineering considerations related to construction of the proposed residence are included. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed project will consist of the construction of a single-family residential building and a detached garage. The proposed residence and garage will be two-story wood-Framed structures with a below grade level at the residence. In order to accommodate the residence, the section of Rocky IVlountain Ditch located on the north side of the building site will be covered from Pierce Street to the west side of the residential structure, and replaced with a culvert pipe. Proposed cuts and fills across the site appear to be minimal with the exception of the fill required for the installation of the proposed culvert pipe. If the proposed construction and conditions differ from the information described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations provided in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The project site appeared as an undeveloped vacant lot. The lot was bordered by Rocky Mountain Di4ch and a single-family residence to the north, single-family residences to the south and west, and Pierce Street to the east. The surface of the ptoperty displayed vegetation consisting oF shoR to medium grasses, weeds, and deciduous trees. Discarded tree remnants and Job No. 02-3083 Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 2 Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Colorado other deleterious materials were also present [hroughout the site. Based on site observations, the general topography oF the site was generally flat to slightly sloping down to the north. Rocky Mountain Ditch was approximately 15 feet wide and approximately 8 feet deep. A small secondary ditch, approximately 1 to 2 feet deep, runs east to west across the site between the proposed residence and garage site. We understand that both ditches typically have continuously running water from May through September, and were both dry a[ the time of our exploration. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION The subsurface' exploration for the project was conducted on May 3, 2002. Three (3) test holes were drilled at the approximate locations as indicated in Figure 1 to explore the subsurface conditions. Two (2) of the test holes were advanced within the approximate limits of the proposed residence. The remaining test hole was drilled within the approximate limi[s of the pcoposed gazage. The test holes were drilled to provide information For foundation recommendations. Test holes were advanced into site soils wi[h a truck mounted 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger drill rig. The test holes were logged by a representative of Ground Engineering Consultants, Ina Samples of the subsurface materials were taken with a 2-inch I.D. California liner sampler. The sampler was ilriven into the substrata with blows from a 140-pound hammer falling approximately 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetrntion test described by ASTM Method D-1586. Penetration resistance values, when properly evaluated, indicate the relative density or consistency of the soils. Measurements of the groundwatet level were made in the test holes by lowering a weighted tape into the open holes shortly after the drilling. Depths at which the samples were taken, the ' penetration resistance values, and groundwater was encountered are shown on the logs of the test holes in Figure 2. The associated legend and notes for the logs are shown in Figure 3. Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 3 ]ob No.02-3083 Bark Residence Wheal Ridge, Colorado LABORATORY TESTING Samples obtained from our exploratory holes were examined and visually classified in the laboratory by the project engineer. Laboratory testing included standard property tests, such as natural moisture contents, dry unit weights, grain size analyses and liquid and plastic limits. The concentration of water-soluble sulfates was determined for selected soil samples. Results of the laboratory testing program are summarized on Table 1. The laboratory testing was conducted in general accordance with applicable ASTM specifications. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface conditions encountered in the test holes generally consisted of man-made £ill overlying namral sand and clay. Bedrock was not encountered in Ihe test holes to the maximum depth of explora[ion ranging from approximately 20 to 35 feet below the existing gcades. Man-made fxll was encountered near the ground surface in all of the test holes to depths ranging from approximately 8 to 13 feet. The fill material consisted primarily of clayey sand to sandy clay, and was fine to medium grained, non to medium plastic, dry to moist, reddish-brown [o gray in color, and containing brick pieces and black organic materials. The actual vertical and lateral extents and the consistence of the fill were not detetmined in this s[udy. Natural sand and clay was underlying the man-made fill in all of the [est holes to the maximum depth of exploration ranging from approximately 20 to 35 feet below the existing grades. The sand and clay ranged from clayey sand to sandy clay, and was fine grained, non to medium plastic, loose to medium dense or soft to very stiff, moist to wet, and tan to light brown in color. Free Groundwater was encountered in two (2),of the test holes at a depth of approximately 20 feet below the existing grades during the drilling. Groundwater levels can be anticipated to flucruate in response to longer term cycles of precipitation, irrigation, and changes in site grading, drainage, land use, and water levels in the adjacent ditches. FOUNDATION RECOMMENATIONS Results of our field and laboratory testing indicated that both densities and moisture contents of the existing fill were highly variable. Additionally, scattered brick pieces and organic materials were encountered in the fill. Footings placed directly on this fill can experience excessive total and differential settlement. Ideally, the total depth of the existing fill materials should be ]ob No. 02-3083 Gruund Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 4 Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Colorado removed, and replaced in a properly compacted state to reduce the potential total and differential settlement. Considering the subsurface conditions encountered on-si[e and the namre of the proposed construction, we believe that the proposed structures may be founded on spread footings placed on a reduced thickness of existing man-made fill materials, if the Owner is willing to assume the risk of a reduced potential of foundation movement. The less fill materials left beneath the foo[ings, the less risk of potential foundation movement [he Owner will [ake. However, the Owner must understand that the potential fill setdement can be reduced, but cannotbe eliminated even the fill is properly placed and compacted. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation 'system. The construction details should be considered when preparing project documents. (1) We recommend that'footings for the residence be placed on the existing fill at least 10 feet below the existing grades to reduce the potential se[tlement, or placed on undisturbed natural soils encountered at a shallower depth. (2) We recommend that Footings for the detached garage be placed on the existing fill at least , 5 feet below the existing grades, or pfaced on undisturbed natural soils encountered at a' shallower dep[h. (3) Footings placed on the on-site fill materials or undisturbed natural soils may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. (4) The spread footings should have a minimum footing dimension of 14 inches. However, the actual footing dimensions should be based on the design loads. (5) Exterior footings.should be provided with adequate soil cover above their beazing elevation for frost protection. In the event that natural soil is encountered at a shallower depth, footings should be placed at a bearing elevation of at least 3.0 feet below the exterior finish grades. (6) The lateral resistance of spread footing foundations will be developed as the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials. Sliding friction at the bottom of the footings can be taken as 035 times the veRical dead load. ]ob No. 02-3083 Ground Engineering Consul[ants, Inc. . Page 5 Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Colorado (7) Continuous footings should be reinforced [op and bottom to span an unsupported leng[h of at least 10 feet. (8) Prior to the placement of footing concrete on the existing fill, scarification of the fill material should be performed in all footing areas to a minimum depth of 8 inches below the Footing bearing elevations, and recompacted to at least 98 percent of the maximum standazd Proctor density (ASTM D-698) within 2 percent of the optimum moismre content. (9) In the event that natural soil is encountered at a shallower depth, care should be taken when excavating the foundation to avoid disturbing the natural supporting materials. Hand excavation or careful backhoe soil removal may be required in excavating the last few inches. Dismrbed namral soils should be removed and properly recompacted. (10) On-site soils may pump or deform excessively under [he wheel loads of heavy construc[ion vehicles as [he excavations approach foo[ing levels. Construction equipment should be as light as possible to avoid this difficulty. The movement of vehicles over proposed foundation azeas should be res[ricted. (11) The bottom of footing excavations should be observed and tested by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to the scazification and recompac[ion, and prior to the placemen[ of concrete. Any undesirable fill material encountered near the bottom of the footing excavations should be removed and replaced with properly compacted suitable on-site fill. FLOOR SYSTEM Based on the results oF our field exploration and laboratory testing, slab-on-grade construction roay, be used for the floor system. However, considering the potential impact of ditch water to the building, the floor slab for the lower level of the residence should be placed at least two (2) feet above the bottom of the adjacent Rocky Mountain Ditch or the proposed culvert pipe. (1) Due to highly variable in nature of the existing fill, prior to the placement of gravel layer and slab concrete, scarification of the fill material should be performed in all floor slab areas to a minimum depth of 8 inches below the bottom of gravel layer, and recompacted to _at least 98 percent of the maximum standazd Proctor density (ASTM D-698) within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content. Job No. 02-3083 Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 6 Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Colorado (2) Slab subgrade material shou(d be observed and tested by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to the scarification and recompac[ion, and prior [o [he placement of gravel layec Any undesirable fill material encountered in the slab subgrade should be removed and replaced with properly compacted suitable on-site fill. (3) A minimum 4-inch layer of free-drainage gravel should be placed beneath the slabs. The gravel layer will help distribute floor slab loadings, limit capillary moisture rise, and aid in drainage. This material should con[ain typically '/o-inch to 1-inch clean crushed rocks. The gravel layer should be connected ro the exterior perimeter underdrain system as described in the "Underdrain System" section of this report. (4) Floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with an expansion joint, which allows unrestrained vertica] movement. (5) F7oor slabs should be provided with controljoints to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking, and should be adequately reinforced. We suggest that joints be provided on the order of 10 fee[ on centers. The actual joint spacing should be based on the slab reinforcement design. (6) All plumbing lines should be carefully tested before opera[ion. Where plumbing lines en[er through the floor, a positive bond break should be provided. Flexible connec[ions should be provided for slab-bearing mechanical equipment. FOUNDATION WALLS AND RETAINING STRUCTURES Founda[ion walls which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo a limited amount of deflection may be designed for an at-rest lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 55 pcf for import CDOT Class 1 structural backfill material, and 69 pcf for the on-site materials used as backfill. , Cantilevered retaining structures on the site can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condiNon. Therefore, cantilevered structures may be designed for an active lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 35 pcf and a passive lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 440 pcf for import CDOT Class 1 strucmral backfill material, and 47 pcf for active lateral earth pressure and 360 pcf for passive lateral earth pressure for the omsite backfill. Job No. 02-3083 Grwnd Engineering Coasultants, Inc. Page 7 Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Colorado A1lfoundation walls and retaining structures should be designed for surcharge pressures such as adjacen[ traffic and construction materials and equipmen[. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls based on a properly functioning underdrain system and a horizon[al backfill surface. The build-up of wa[er behind a wall or an upwazd sloping backfill surface also increases the earth gressures on the walls. We recommend import CDOT Class 1 structural backf'ill material for backfilling foundation walls and retaining structures, because their use results in lower lateral earth pressures. The granular wall backfill should extend a minimum of 1/2 of [he wall height beyond the foundation walls and retaining structures. The import structural backfill should be tested and approved by GROUND prior to shipping to [he site. Wall backfill should be carefully placed in uniform loose lifts not exceeding 8 inches, and compacted to 95 percent of the maximum standazd Proctor density (ASTM D-648) near the optimum moisture content. Care should be taken no[ to overcompact the backfill since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the walls. Some setdement of deep foundation wall backfill will occur even if the materials aze placed correctly. Considerations must be given [o the impacts of these settlements on the surrounding sidewalks, entrances, and landscaping. WATER-SOLUBLE SULFATES The concentrations of water-soluble sulfates measured in the soil satnples obtained from the exploratory holes ranged from a below the detectable level to 0.05 percent. These concentra[ions of water-soluble sulfates represent a negligible degree of sulfate attack on concrete exposed to these materials. The degree of attack is based on a range of negligible, moderate, severe, and very severe as presented in the "Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures" presented by the Portland Cement Association. Based on this information, GaoE1ND makes no recommendation for use of special sulfate- resistant cement in concrete exposed to site soils and bedrock. UNDERDRAINSYSTEM Although groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 20 feet at the time of drilling; the water in the adjacent drainage ditches could lead to elevated moisture contents or temporary saturation of soils near the basement level. Therefore, the proposed residence should be protected by an exterior perimeter underdrain system. Job No. 023083 . Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 8 . Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Colorado The underdrain systems should consist of drainpipe, free-draining gravel; and filter fabric. The high point of the drainpipe should be placed a[least 12 inches below floor slab grade outside of the foundation walls. Drainpipe should be graded at a minimum slope of 1 percen[ [o multiple oudets for gravity discharge. The 6-inch perforated PVC drainpipe should be sunounded on the sides and the top with a minimum 6-inches of free-draining gravel. The free-draining gravel should be extended upward to 12 inches below the finish grades, or replaced by the installation of drain boards on the foundation walls connecting to the drainpipe at the bottom. The free- draining gravel should contain less than 5 percent passing the No 200 sieve and more than 50 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve, and have a maximum particle size of 2 inches. The gravel surrounding the drainpipe should be wrapped with filter fabric (Mirafi 140N or equivalent) to reduce the migration of fines into the drain system. Typical underdrain details for free draining gravel oc drain board aze illustrated in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: (1) Excessive wetting ot drying of the foundation excavations and underslab azeas should be avoided during construction. (2) Positive surface drainage should be provided and maintained to reduce water infiltration into foundation soils. The finish grades surrounding the exterior of the buildings should be sloped to drain away from the foundations in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the t`irst 10 Feet. In no case should water be allowed to pond neaz or adjacent to foundation elements. (3) Roof downspouts and drains should dischazge well beyond the limits of the foundation backfill, or be provided with positive conveyance off-site for collected waters. (4) Landscaping which requires watering by.imgation sprinklers should be located 10 or more feet from building perimeters. Use of drip irrigation systems near the buildings can be beneficial for reducing the amount of water introduced to building foundation soils, but only if the total volumes of applied water aze controlled with regard to limiting that introduction. Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 9 Job No. 02-3083 , Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Cnlorado SITE GRADING Site grading fills should be placed in uniform loose lifts not exceeding 8 inches, and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor densiry (ASTM D-698) at uniform moisture content within 2 percent of optimum. Prior to fill placement, all topsoil should be removed, the underlying natural soils should be scarified [o a depth of 8 inches, and recompacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density (ASTM D-698) within 2 percent of the optimum moismre con[ent ro provide a uniform base for fill placemen[. The permanent cut and fill slopes less thao 10 feet in height may be constructed at a ratio of 3 (H) to 1(V). The risk of slope instability will be significandy increased if seepage is encountered in cu[s. We do not anticipate seepage will be encountered. However, if it is, a stability analysis should be conducted to determine if the seepage will adversely affect the cut. Good surface drainage should be provided around all permanen[ cuts and fills [o direct surface i runoff away from the slope face. Cut slopes and other stripped areas should be protected against erosion by revegetation or other methods. Site grading should be carefully planned to provide positive sutFace drainage away from all buildings and pazking azeas. The buildings and parking azeas should be placed as high as possible on the site so that positive drainage away from these features can be provided. Surface diversion features should be provided azound parking azeas to prevent surface runoff from flowing across the paved surface. EXCAVATION CONSIDERATIONS Test holes for subsurface exploration were advanced by means of truck-mounted, flight auger ~ equipment. We anticipate no unusual excavation difficulties for the proposed construction in these materials with conventional heavy-duty excavating equipment in good working condition. We recommend that temporary excavation slopes up to 15 feet in depth be cut no steeper than a 1.5 (H) to L(V) slope in the fill material. Some surface sloughing may occur on the slope faces at this angle. Stockpiling of materials should not be pemutted closer to the tops of temporary slopes [han 5 feet or a distance equal to Ihe depth of the excava[ion, which ever is greatet. - Should site constraints prohibit the use of the recommended slope angles, then temporary shoring should be used. The shoring system(s) should be designed for the contractor by a registered engineer. Excavations in which personnel will be working must comply with all OSHA Job No. 02-3083 Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 10 Bark Residence 'Wheat Ridge, Cobrado Standards and Regulations particularly CFR 29 Part 1926, OSHA Standazds-Excavations, adopted March 5, 1990. Good surface drainage should be provided around temporary excavation slopes to direct surface runoff away from the slope faces. A properly designed drainage swale should be provided at the top of the excavations. In no case should water be allowed to pond at the site. Slopes should also be protected against erosion. Erosion along the slopes will result in sloughing, and could lead to a slope failure. CLOSURE AND LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report relied upon subsurface exploration at a limited number of locations as shown in Figure 1. Subsurface condi[ions were interpolated and extrapolated from these locations, and our recommendations were developed for the site conditions as described above. The actual subsurface conditions may differ from those encountered in the test holes due to the nature of variation and grade changes. If during construction, soil, or groundwater conditions appear ro be different from those described herein, the Geotechnical Engineer should be advised, at once, so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. The performance of foundations and subsurface structures can be directly attributed to adequate geotechnical review and earthwork quality control. Therefore, project construction plans and specifications should be ceviewed by the Geotechnical Engineer to evaluate whether they comply with the intent of the recommendations in this report. The earthwork operations should be observed and materials tested by the Geotechnical Engineer. The geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are highly contingent upon observation and testing of earthworks by representatives oF GROUND. If another geotechnical consultant is selected to perform quality control, then that consultant must assume all responsibility For the geotechnical aspects of the projecL This report has been prepazed for the Client pertaining to design of the subject project as described herein. It may not contain sufficient information for other parties or other purposes. GxoUND has assumed that the project construction will commence in 2002. Changes in project plans or schedule should be bronght to the our attention, so that the geotechnical recommendations may be re-evaluated.and modifed as necessary. This report was prepazed in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practice in the this azea at, Job No. 02-3083 Ground Engineering Consultanfs, Inc. Page 11 Bark Residence Wheat Ridge, Colorado the time of prepazation. GROUND makes no other wananties, either express or implied, as to the professional data, opinions, orrecommendations contained herein. Sincerely, GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. Scott A. Sickler, P.E. Reviewed by (Sean) Chiang, Ph.D., P.E. .i Job No. 023083 Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 12 ,L~~2II.S ~a2i~Id i I I v M • 0 ~ i ~ z I I ~ a~ C ~ o I F.' U O O y 0 ~ c~ F N ~ ( x a ~ F. a I ~ 0 ~ U b b C I ~ • Test Hole . Test Hole Test Hole 1 2 3 0 i7/iz 23/12 23/12 5 35/12 12/12 l Ct. rr.z: 17/12 10 r..r.i. xv.i .%.%.1.. 17/12 18/12 20/12 15 .~l,%: J./.?;; J:%;'✓( . - Y.Y.!'. .!'/.'t' . ~'l:F.. ./:I./.. '✓l't_ - . » . r..ir. 8/12 ~r..r. 7/12 ~ 20 ' 17/12 r. r.r. r.~.i .%.%.J. . . .J J i~ 25 rr. ~ J: FJ: r.r.~ .i~cr..~ . . j.'{✓' ~ r..i.i' . . . 30 F.:~✓: .✓~%.i~.. • . LG: ./.'F!' J: FJ' 35 zo/iz 40. GROUHn . ENGINEERING CONSULTfINTS LOGS OF TEST HOLES ~ JOB N0. 02-3083 DRAWN BY: HS FIGIIgE: g APPROVED HY: SS CADFILE NAME: 30B3IAG.DWG LEGEND: ~ Fill: Clayey sand or sandy clay, fine to medium grained, non to medium plastic, dry to moist, reddish-brown to black or gray in color containing brick pieces and dark black orgenic meteriala ~ Sand and Clap. Clayey sand to sandy clny, fine grained, noa to medium plastic, loose to medium ~ dense or aoft to very atiff, moist to vet, and tan to light brown in color. LJ Drive sample, 2-inch I.D. California liner sample 23/12 Drive sample blow count, indicates 23 blows of a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the sampler 12 inchea ' 0 - Depth to water level and number ot days after drilling that measurement was taken NOTES: 1) - Test holea were drilled on 05/03/02 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power augere. 2) Locations of the test holes were measured approximately by pacing from featurea ahown on the aite plaa provided. 3) Elevationa oi the test holes were not measured and the logs of the test holes are drawn to depth. 4) The test hole locations and elevations should be considered accurate oaly to the degree impliedby the method used. 5) The linea between materials shownon the teat hole logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and the transitions may be graduel. B) Groundwater level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuationa in the water level may occur with time. - 12" .WALL = SLIP JOINT FLOOR SLAB Ii i ~ i ~ 4" GRAVEI. LAYER 4-INCH PERFOftATED- PVC PIPE GRADED AT MIN. 1 % SLOPE WALL SLIP JOINT FLOOR SLAB 4" GRAVEL LAYER H (r AZ J N x~ ~ Z 0 u ~ z~ ~z Z W ~ W ~ E~ ~ F ~ m ~ F ~ H O ~ O ~ ~ . O ~ ~ ~ ~ G ca A ~ c° c ~ ~ ro V. F O ~ T y T ~ ~ T . ~ ~ y . T Y T ~ , T T m 9 . U ( j . U r/] v' U 7) U , y T ~ ~ oa v- > u" > > R o,,,,, o p o ~ w ~ • x C ` y m ~ o ~o z ~n ~ ~D ~ ~ a d ~ 7 E O . N V1 M M T 00 O~ ~ .Q' a` . M : N M d' N N N . N > . vi N Q. N M 7 O~ ~O O c+i - V Q~ 7 z~ P .i Pr a a ~ z Q ~ L Cd O O ~ - c C~C 6al ` A V . C' O~ M 00 ~ V G~ Q F~ Y ~ F O z - ~ ^ N N N M M ~ ~ 0 rv z° °o N 7 ~ .n ~ U ~ N ~ ro 3 0 ~ m ~ 0 m = LL - !5 t'~ c- ~.c! . . D. t ~ V4 E (157 -4 40Y e 4 IVrr 40 (9) ' -3~0 Ib/~1" t''i - ~~-7 ~►~)2~a ~ 13,'f15 tb •F'T V = 477 (►5/2~ = 3, 578 fb ~ K rPe G j7/8 H~ (e>, 9Z.6 -ry' Ob = 775- (b - FT' ~ ~.at~okJ 150 16 )(°J'' ° t>5~~> 16 (28a Ita~FT')~3) = 84-o Ib/fT ~ (ZZ I Ib/Ft' )(3) Ib/f PT' ~ % 1 ~4 ~ ! I'/6 `To ~Paci L~~ ~ou~0•~r'ia~-! t~~1G~1 14 0 ,s + GZI 6 Ptf LooK~►~4 °p Z L' G`T 1 O U CF Wb'Lt-- Z. t>k 2•8k )69,~~ M - q~ r'( 0 = I. 7~4 z l. 7( 9.'5z k! A~ c~rl~.. 3, 04Xn> co•vuc~-r~ G~d K~1 ~K~Cae-~ I ~~Z ~ Co•~~ C oL., _ w5 Pvo`T+d 1--l~--~s GENE D. ~ BARK ~ ~-Z21f7 ~ Vs,KTG~. ±51-96L~ VA--t>50H6 y f h It4 g HI~4 - Ira-=)11P6 Fa~ M j,.~ To it~T'i~ fy = I.a co ; . oF coto~ ~ 90 GEN~ D. p v/ ~ {J~u la Ga,~o 0.0033 G~TiCot_5 b c4 g t'~ ik-~ =`i 2") t'2 I/Z ";t a. 06a3)° 0. ~S1"1W ct 4 1S-s •~o. z4 in'/-F}')~~~~~ . o. ~f7 o.~~ -E'~ b Co.aSX~ks;?(12 G.ct ~L.. ~ ✓ o. 9(G. wx vZ;6 S,,--> (S? o& q ")C3)( 1 Z) o. bc~f- , ~ ~ N 1 D DG, . yip,i = o . o0 2 # ~ ~G I ~ ~ OG +~O~Ki ~q~Ff•.,.. ~ c.7i otN-XIs--L (,0•-~✓5 py,~ ►..~~1..~, lo P~F l OT ave4d!~ W v = Z~ p~~' Wb~ 8 OF:" o.eerL zj'--Ur COC cENE D. t~ BfiRiG es' ~/7 a~ o" 7i$ 14/vr-# ~ l<-(,,~ I 52 P~-~ Wo = 4~ P►~ vuokt La.-~v~ tZooF' 3o P~' o~G S=o" I•4 (D) all~~ ~~/.7(~~ ~ ~•¢~432~~ ).7~~'0' 2~5~ = 21 k}~' ~-Ifn = o. 55 -t~ - 0•55 l7o)~~x12~~8~ i,c,~ q,ri~2~ C 32(~ = 11. r k/-~- °!►•t ~ 2l ~ 13/4" 1.9E MICROUAM° LVL e] i nweeLE DESIGN PROPERTIES (100% Loao oukarioN) roPe!Zjn' r ~.P "F~(i ~k A*[r ` 31h - ~ ~ APIa ti a"'F~"~- °f6^i. tBM~l! , . S . . . t . . kft::yNoment fElbsk Z,~ZS 3,555 5,600 5,885 8,070 8,925 12,130 15,555 19,375 ^R„7q5t~izr(Ibs},`~,s:; 1,830 2,410 3,075 3,160 3,740 3,950: 4,655 5,320 5,985 tOf, IJ Zq 56 115 125 ZO8 Z44 400 597 851 WeighC plf) " 2.8 37 4J 4.8 SJ 6.0 7.1 8.1 9.1 19E MICROLLAM* LVL ALLOWABLE DESIGN STRESSES (100% LOAD DURATION) Shear modulus of elasticity G- 17 8,750 psi Modulus of elasticity E- 1.9 x 106 psi . Flexural ztress Fy - 2,600 psi(') Compression perpendicular to grain parallel to glue line Fu- 750 psi(z) Compression parallel to gain Fdi = 2,510 psi Horizontrl shear perpendicular to glue line F„ = 285 psi (1) For 12' depth_ For others, multfply by [i d 2]0136 (2) F, shall not be increased for duration of load [A 11 GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS FOR MICROLLAMO LVL • Values shown throughout this brochure are applicable to productr used in dry service conditions only. • Lateral support is required at all bearing poinh and along compression edge at intervals of 24" omcenter or closer. • Use specific gravity of 0.5 when designing connections. • Bearing lengths are 6ased on Microllamm LVL's bearing stress of 750 psi. • MicrollamQO WL beams are made without camber, therefore, in additlon to complying with the deflection limitr of the applicable building code, other consideratlons, such as long term deflection under sustained loads (including cmep), pondfng (positive dainage is essential) and aesthetia, must be evaluated. • All memben 711+" and less in depth are restricted to a maximum deflecEon of sh e". • Roof inembers must either be sloped for drainage or designed to account for load and deflection as specified in the applicable building code. • Tables on pages 4-7 include reductions applied in a<cordance with: 1997 UBC 1607, 1999 80CA NBC 1606, 1999 SBC 1604 and 2000 IBC 1607 for floor live load; 1997 UBC 7607, 1999 BOCA NBC 1607, 1999 S8C 1604 and 2000 IBC 1601 for roof live load in non-snow (125Y=) conditions. • 31/z" members are two pie<es of 7314° MicrollamO LVL. 5114" members are three pieces of 1314" Microllamm LVL • 1314' x 16' and 13/4" z 18'beams are to be used in multiple member unitr only. See page 17 far multiple member beam connectianr. 1.9E I-i General Notes • Table is baced on: ~ - Unikrm loads (beam weight ronsidered) and the more restrictive of simple or continuous span. - Deflection criteria of U240 total load and L1360 live load. • For deflectlon limits of LI240 and 1.1980, multlply Inrve Ioad values by 1.5 and OJS, respectively. The resulting load shall not exceed the total load shown. AGo eee Genem! Areumptionr on page 3. yyz" WidN 5114" Width ° " Span Condition R~ _T6•, 18" 20" 9'14 " 1 " 11~1. " 1111+" 14 16 18 20 TotalLoad 3589 1297 ZZS7 3083 3188 39R 4273 5384 6' Live Load LI360 870 1879 Min. EndlInt Beanng (in.) 4.11103 1.513.5 17143 2315.9 2.416.1 3.017.6 2 45 3.2181 2935 4.11103 3621 4328 TotalLOad 2414 2885 438 976 2086 2193 7 8' Live Load L1360 380 892 1666 1792 Min.Eed/lnteeanng(in.) 3J193 4.9111.1 1.513.5 1513.5 2]153 7.215.6 2.817.0 2128 3.017.5 2354 3.719.3 2905 4.4111.1 3441 TotalLoad 1937 2299 219 498 1475 1551 1032 1112 1778 2061 9'-6" LiveL.oad L1360 8 3518 911105 1.513.5 1.513.5 1.814.5 1.914] 2,6/6.5 2.917.2 3.5/8.8 41110.5 Min. Endllnt eeanng (in.) . 1398 1919 2123 U25 3221 TotalLoad 1817 2197 177 405 1325 893 963 1544 1792 10' Live Load LI360 3518J 4 11103 1.5/35 1.5I3.5 1.714.2 1.814.5 2.9161 2)16.8 3.518J 9.1110.3 Min.EndllntBeann (in.) . 13U 1469 2000 2563 1333 1709 82 193 781 849 TotalLoad 530 572 927 1080 1707 2453 12' Live Load L/360 1138 1635 1 5/3 5 1 513 5 5 1 513 1.5135 2.015.1 2.2/5J 3.117.7 3.919.9 Min. End/lnt Bearin (in.) 3]17.7 3.919.9 . . . . . . 535 879 1028~ 1463 1880 2345 ToWI Wad 975 1253 1563 100 499 339 366 597 697' 1112 1613 2225 14' ve Load 1_1360 741 1075 1483 5 1513 5/3 5 1 513 5 1 1 614.0 1.8143 2.616.6 3.918.5 4.2I10.6 Min. End/Int eearing (in.) 2.616.6 3.418.5 4.2110.6 . . . , . 2 . 540 634 1026 1346 1680 2098 TotalLoad 684 897 1120 1365 300 209 3 6 227 371 435. 698 1020 1418 1895 76'-6" L+ve Load L1360 465 680 995 1263 5 513 1 5 513 1 5 150 1.513.5 2115.5 2.917.2 3.618.9 4.4110.9 Min. End/lnt eearin (in-) 2215.5 2.917.2 3.618.9 4.4110.9 . . . . 28 . 382 449 733 1066 1331 1623 TotalLOad 988 710 887 1082 210 149 2 162 266 311 502 737 1030 1383 18'-6" Live Load L1360 335 491 686 922 5 1513 1 513 5 1 513 5 5135 1 1.814.4 2.6/6.4 3118.0 3.919.7 Min. Endllnt Beanng (in.) 1.814.4 2.616.4 3218.0 3.919.7 . . . 1 . . 300 , 359 580 861 1135 1389 TotalLoad 387 574 756 922 164 78 1 590 826 1112 20' live Load L1360 267 393 550 741 119 128 212 298 1 513 5 40 1 513 9 2315 7 0/7 5 3 3.619.0 ) dlint eeann (in E Mi 1 513 9 2315.7 3.0I7.5 3.619.0 1.5/3.5 1.513.5 1.513.5 . . . . . . . . n n. . . 98 168 200 332 498 707 951 lL ad T t 221 332 471 634 90 a O o 442 69 75 123 145 235 348 490 663 24' Live Load L1360 157 232 326 513 5 1 1 513 5 5 1 513 1 513.5 1.513.5 1.614.1 2315.8 3.017.5 Min. Endllnt Beann (in.) 1.513.5 1.614.1 2315.8 3.017.5 . . . . . . 100 . 120 203 308 992 607 TotalLoad 135 205 295 405 51 56 47 78 92 199 222 313 425 26' Live Load LI360 99 148 208 283 93 513 5 1 1 5I35 5 1 513 1.5/3.5 1.5135 1.513.5 1J14.4 2315J Min. Endllnt 6eann (in.) 151305 1.513.5 1314.4 2315J . . . . . I I: ~ 1 ti 3 c e~ $ m^ ~co~ ~ N . r4 ~ g U c u ~ ~ . Q ~ • ~ o -A U a ~ ? ~ ~ ~U~ gWo ~ m W ~ ua p~ mis 19 F ID~ 0 ~ a z = z~. ~W M ~ a i~ a . 0 M _ M 0 . ~ . ~ M M Y ~ r a8 oA u~ RECEA'fION H0. F1323982 10/62/2001 i1:OG:21 RG; 001-001 PAGE FEE: 5.00 DOC.FE£: 4.30 kEGORDED IN JEFFERS014 CQUNTY, COLORRDO ~I WARftANTY DEED TH7SDEED, Madethis 27th dayof September . 2001, between Barbara J. 8aker and William H. Baker ofiheCounty of Je£ferson andSwteof Colorado . gxantor, and Gene D. Sakc and Margaret H. Baplc aARK whoselegaladdressis 322 Laveta Pass Avenue, Golder_, Co 80401 oftheCounty of Je££erson andStateof colorado .gra¢tees: 4VITNFSS,Thatthegmtor,focandinconsideeationofihesumof FORTY THAEE TAOUSAND AND NO/100 -----------------------DOLI,ARS.($43.000.00 ),therecciptand - - sufficienry of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bazgained, sold md coaveyed, md by these presen[s does grant, bar- gaiq sell, convey md confum, unro the gran[ees, iheir Leus and assigns Porevet, not in teoaneg fo common but in jaiut teuaucy, all tUe real pmputy together with iwpmvements, if nny, siwate, lying aad6eing ia the County of .7ef f erson • md State of ColorxJo, desctibed as follows: Parcel 1: The South 100 feet of the East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Lot 2, Block 2, Barth's Subdivision, Except the North 11 feet of the West 100 feet and except the South 7 feet, thereof, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado alsoknownbysaeeeandounnbezas Vacant Land, Whea*_ Ridge, colorado 80214 T'OGLr1TiER with all and singulnr the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertainio6, and the reversion and revezsions, remainder and remaindus, reuts, issues md pmfits thereof, aud all the zstate, righC title, intecest, claim md demand whatsoever of Hhe grantor, either iu ]ativ or equity, of, in and ro We above bargained premises, with ihe heredlwments mmd appurtenances. TO EiAVF. AND TO HOLD lhe said pzemises above bazgainerl azd desexibed, with the appur[enaaes, unro t6e giantces, their heirs md assigns foxevei. And the g.antor, for himself, hie heus md pexsonal tepcesenWtives, does covena¢4 graot, bazgain aud agrec to md with the grantees, Neix heirs and usigns, dhet at the time of the ensealing and delivery of Ihese presents, he is well seized of lhe premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inha'ifance, in law, iu fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful suthoriCy to BxsuC bargai¢, sell md convey the samc in mannex and form as aforesaid, md ttat t6a same aze free md clear from all former aad other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbranoes and testrictions of whatever kind or naNre soever, except for taxes Por the c¢rrevt yrar, a Gen but not yut duc and payable, easemertts, restrictions, reservarions, corcnants md rights-of-way of record, it any. The grautor shall md will WARRANTAND FORHVER DEFEND the above-bazgaiued pmmises iu the quiet and peaceable possas- sion of tl3e grantees, theic heirs md assigns, agaiust all and every pe:son or persons lawfu]Iy claiming the whole or any pazt [hereaf• The singalaz number sLall incIude the plural, llie pluial Uie singulaz, md the use of auy gender sUall be applicable to all genders. IN W WHEREOF, t6e granior has executed t6is deed oa tLe date se forth sbove. J ) 1 Barbara J. Bak William H. Sak r RlPIlfsLtC + STATEOP COLORADO ; J : _,:_.__._'.._=,_-W'_~~•ri~-- . ~ h3yGOmmissiun Expires 718I" ) WUNI'YOF DENVER 'Ihe focegoing instrumettt was acknowledged befom me this 27th Barbara J. Baker and William H. Baker ivlyCommissionexpices: July 18, 2003 dayof September , 2601,by s6a d m fficiel ual. 5 otazy Public ri WARRANTI DEHD (to JoiH Se-1m) 0010urcr0) Pitoa -nn~ AWEMCA of 2Sl-d*g 01 6 ;pN iuoya Jclti =N IaStl HVid J i5 vqy &pmp ~n LO51R la sa-. a ra amp 7 W rn W W V V 1 Z apo~ Nag ~a anssi 'op r~ N1Y/7 ;n2O& gNl~4/h' r7'Zr7 ,'JM1pld~ N 9w8v9 NV NalvM IVNIJ-Vl A N3N EI30Nn NnS C Nalvm lYN5.Lyl .171" Ia/ aON3015aL1 ANOI HO-LICE NIY1NnO 9NUSIX2 d0 aN >,~y4ti HV7d mus G E N E D. B A R K A. I. A. September 23, 2002 Michael Pesicka Planner Planning and Development Department . City of Wheatridge, Colorado ~ RE: 3181 Pierce Street The following comments and attached plan set is in response to review comments dated July 31, 2002. Thank you for your time in reviewing this matter. 1. Other than driveway and walks the intention is not to have any stand alone non- living material areas. Non-living materials will be used between plantings to help with weed control and water savings. Native Coloradgrasses/flowers and existing vegetation will be used if not specifically identified. /F 2. See revised SheetA-1, Drawing 1. 3. See attached. 4. See attached. 5. See attached revised plan set. Thank You, X3 ~ Gene D. Bark RECEPiION N0. F:1.329982 10162/2601 11:0•G:21 RGc OOi-OOf PRGE FEE: 5.00 DOC.FEE: 4.30 kECORDED TN JEFFERSON COLINTY, COLORADO T' I "J ~ ~ J WARRANTY DEED THISDELrD, Madettis 27th dayof September , 2001, between Barbara J. Baker and William H. Baker ofiheCounty of Jefferson andStnteof Colorado grantor, and Gene D. Bakc and Margzret H. BaRlc SARK~y, S?~RK ~ whoselegaladdressis 322 Laveta Pass Avenue, Golden, CO 80401 oftlieCounty oP Jef£eKSOn andStateof Colorado ,gra¢tees: {YITNESS, That the gtentor, foc anS iu considecelion of ihe sumof FORTY THREE THOIISAND ACQD N0110 D-- _____________________________________________DOLLARS.($43,000.00 ),Werecciptand sufFiciency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted bagained, sold md conveyed, md by these presents does grant, bar- gain, sell, convey md conCucu, mto iLe grauhies, theit' heirs and assigns Porever, not in teuancy fo common bnt in jaint ienancp, all tBe xeai property figether With impzovements, if any, simate, lying and beiug iu the County of Jef f exson . uid S[ate of Coloratb, dzscribed aS foAows: Parcel 1: The south 100 feet of the East 2/2 of the North 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Lot 2, Block 2, Barth's Subdivision, Except the North 11 feet of tne West 100 feet and except the South 7 faet, thereof, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado alsoknuwnbystreetandnumberas Vacant Land, Wheat Ridge, Calorado 80214 TOGCTIiER with all and singulu the hereditameo[s utd appurtenances thereunW belonging, or in anywise appcrlaining, aod the reversion and reversions, remainder azid reuiainders, renta, issues md pmfifs thereof, avd all the estate, righ4 Utle, interesf, claim and demand whntsoever of the graniar, either io law or equiry, oP, in md to lhe above bargained premises, wilb :he hereditnments and appurtenances. TO HA VE AND TO HOLD the said ptemises abova bargaimel atd desc:ibed, with tbe appnrkmaoces, unto tlia grantees, their heirs md assigns foievei. And the gaotor, for himself, his heus md penonal ropresenwtlves, does covenant, gran4 bargai¢ and agree lo and with the gtantees, theix heirs and assigus, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery a[ Aiese preseots, he is well seized of Ihc preatises a6ove conveyed, Las good, sure, perfecS absolule and indefeasble estate of inhciitance, in law, iu fee simple, and has good rlght, full power and Iswful authoriry [o grank bargain, sell md convey Ihe samc in manoet and form as aforesaid, md that the same aze free md cleaz from all former md other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbxanoes and restricfions of whatever kind or nanue soever, except for taxes For the curtent yoar, a lien but not yut duc and payablc, easements, restrictions, reservaHons, wvcuautr and rights-o[way ofrecord, if auy. MyCommissionexpires: July 18, 2003 i ~.6f d fficielseal. . ' y ' otazy Public ri The grautor shall and will WARRANTAND FORHVER DEFEND tlie above-bazgaioed pcemises "vn the quiet azld peaceablc posses- sion of tltegra¢tees, tlheir heits md assigns, agaiustall md every pe:sou orpersons lawfully claiming the whole orany parttUercof. The singulaz aumber sMl include the plural, the plural llu Singulaz, md the use of any a ndep shall be applicable to all genders. AN SY I'VHEREOT t6e grsnior has executed this deed on tLe date se forth a6ove. J 1 J4 Barbara J. Bak William H. Bak r ~ j r=S:7 Et:e..~~g1U ii -c ~ N~,•,~,, r,Y PllDLIC s'raT'E Oa coLOaano sr.vrr Qp r_.nL.O11-ti;D0 ~ ~~dyComn,issiontxpiras7Ji81Od COUNTY OF DENV'ER ) The foregoing inshvmenl was acknowledged before me Hhis 27th day of September , 2001 , by Barbara J. Baker and William H. Baker DypRpplVT]' pE$D (tO 70ini T-~nm) MOJMTEN) YIIeA NIt203]3G01 ; TTTLF_ AP$`R',f'~A--------- G E N E D. B A R K A. I. A. September 23, 2002 Darin Morgan Codes Administrator Building Division City of Wheatridge, Colorado RE The following comments and attached plan set is in response to review comments dated July 25, 2002. Thank you for your time in reviewing this matter. 1. See attached 2. See attached. 3. See attached. 4. See revised Sheet S-1. 5. See new Sheet A-0.1 Drawing 1. 6. See attached Plan Set. Thank You, Gene D. Bark I F~ 8 'l ~ ,z n ~ c a~ ~ ]1 S ei ~p U r u _ :r - ~ a \ f I ~ N - , I~ ~ I z -_I ~ gw 04 d w= ~ m w ~ ua w IB mm F m~ s ~ 0 ~ E _ i 3 ~ S~ u~$ M M . a M~ a 0 Y r 0 . p M ~ M ~ Y ~ a~ 0 V n ~ Q ~ > y~ F1qy p( y3 5 A A al"1M11 ~ I I i II ~ i i i i 0. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t r_ ~ z ~ s U ~ I I S V ~ ~ ~Y ~ V I 9 3 , a+ N ~ W v ~ ~ ~ ~ a V ~W O L y > ~ 4' ~ ~ m in a ~ m Q ~ O ~ U ~ sp IL O ~ " S li! (Y L H C Q + + a .o-~ea ~ ~ .......~~o..~. g ~os~g ~o-ls- aooa-- 8'~l ~lS LAND SURVEY~ A PORTION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, BARTH'S THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 26, T3S~ COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE _ S89'S5'78'E 2637.71' NORTH LJNE OF THE SW7HEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 26, T3S, R69W nr _ NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SE 1 /4 rr - of s~c-nvN 2s, r3s, Rssw, 6th P.M., FOUND 3 1 /4" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOXY P.L.S. 13212 _ e r i i ~r ~ W ~ , o S89' 00 = op ~o - - - S89'56'09 "E 14D OA=-- - °2 w r ~ KkPRESENTAl10N OF SA{D SURVEY. THIS 1 WI7H SECTION 38--51-1 Q2. COLORADO RE cci I N t+~~li~1~1r~1#~~~~~~~~~/ O .rte U W ~ r ' ~ a ~ ~ y ~ ~ j, o ~ R ~ ` ti 4 ~ r Ct~~C~RC~C~ PLC ~ ~ ..1, O ~ F, ` ~►~r"~~ ~~~t~ltll't1►~'!~'~` p V M N O x p~ ~ w N QO w ~ ~ M W O ~ ~ ~ 3 NOTES: w w 0 4 ~ o _°o0 1) ANY RECORDED EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS j t^~ t~ "y"'r'"► ~ r i l r ti. 1~ to . r a e w PROPERTY MAY NOT 8E SH01MN HEREO ~ ~ ~ ~ o CURRENT T1TLE COMMITMENT POLICY. o x 0 0 0 ~ ~ N 2} ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MU W BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SUR ~ YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. I F.~ { ~,,,~r,.,,_. x CENTERLIN,,. E. 4~ O~TCH x x -,r x x S89'Sfi'09 "E 158.61 ' X X _ t =SET ~5 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP, P.L.S. 14142 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED . X =FENCE i ,s_ GRAP'HrC SCALE 10 ~ S 10 20 /W ~v~ nGr~J 1 ;.VRIiCR VC 111L IV1/4 F OF THE SE 1 /4 OF SECTION 26, T3S, REVIStONS R69W, 6th P.M., FOUND 3 1/4* BRASS IN FEET CAP IN RANGE 80X, P.L.S. 32429 ~ prepared by. s i inch 10 !t. RUBINO SURVEYING 11945 AIRPORT WAY BROOMFIELD, COLORADO (303) 464-9515 City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado Building Division Pian Review Correction Notice AdcUess: 3181 Pierce Street O,kvner: Gene Bark Cuntractor: Owner Projcet: New SFD Ocenpuncy: R3 / U1 Valnation: $188,261 Datc: July 25, 2002 1" Provide a warranty deed that has been filed with the county. 2. Provide plans and construction documents for walk bridge and driveway crossing to ditch company for ~3. J' w Q ~a~ ~ ~ 4. 5. 6. approval, upon approval submit a letter of approval and a set of the approved plans with your re- submittal Provide a property survey stamped by a licensed land surveyor showing ditch easements, utility and property line information. Provide foundation details and reinforcing information on foundation plan. Provide an existing and proposed overlot grading plan for the site and indicate how drainage will be taken to street and not impact adjacent properties. Address all redlines indicated on plans and resubmit redlines with resubmittal. Please make these additions or corrections to the submittal and resubmit for review, if you have any questions please contact me at 303-235-2853. Thank You, Darin Morgan Codes Administrator