HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-98-177500 West 29th Avenue The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Meat
Telephone 303/237-6944 Ridge
FAX 303/234-5924
June 26, 1998
Ms. Lorraine A. Brown
4430 Tabor Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
RE: WA-98-17
Dear Ms. Brown:
Please be advised that at its meeting of June 25, 1998, the Board of Adjustment DENIED your request
for a Tx 2' home business freestanding sign located at 4430 Tabor Street.
Attached is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became
effective the date of the meeting, (June 25, 1998). Should you decide to appeal the decision of the
Board, you will need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the
Board's decision.
Please feel free-to contact me at 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Barbara Delgadillo
Planning and Development Secretary
/bd
cc: WA-98-17
C:\Bubwa\BOA\CORRES P\wa9817. wpd
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado, on the 25th day of June, 1998.
CASE NO: WA-98-17
APPLICANT'S NAME: Lorraine Brown
LOCATION: 4430 Tabor Street
Upon a motion by Board Member JUNKER, seconded by Board Member ECHELMEYER, the
following resolution was stated:
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA-98-17 is an appeal to this Board
from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the required fifteen days by law and there were no
protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
WA-98-17 be, and hereby is, approved.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: Request for approval of a variance for Section 26-30 of the Wheat
Ridge Code of Laws to allow a 2' x 2' home business freestanding sign for a Class I home
occupation, and an 8-foot business sign variance to the 10-foot business sign setback
requirement.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
Approval of the request will not alter the essential character of this locality as Tabor
Street is more of a business than residential area.
2. Placement of a sign on the southwest comer of the property will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety or welfare.
Resolution WA-98-17/Brown Page 1
3. The size of the sign does comply with the maximum residential sign requirements
established in Section 26-410 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws.
VOTE: Yes: Echelmeyer, Hovland, Junker, Mauro and Walker
No: Abbott and Howard
Absent: Thiessen
The motion failed by a vote of 5-2-1.
DISPOSITION: A request for approval of a variance for Section 26-30 of the Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws to allow a 2' x 2' home business freestanding sign for a Class I home occupation,
and an 8-foot business sign variance to the 10-foot business sign setback requirement was denied
by a vote of 5 to 2, based on Chapter 2, Article 3, Section 2-53(d) of the City of Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws which state that Board of Adjustment motions not carried are thereby deemed
denied.
ADOPTED and made effective this 25th day of June, 1998.
Yoar DA M AURO, Chairman
d of Adjustment
Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
Board of Adjustment
Resolution WA-98-17113rown Page 2
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-
98-16 be, and hereby is, approved.
Type of Variance: A request for approval of a two-foot fence height variance to the
four-foot maximum fence height requirement to allow a six-foot fence in the front yard.
For the Following Reasons:
Although the property is located approximately 200 feet from the nearest public
right-of-way, the northern property line is still considered the front lot line and
therefore must abide by the front yard requirements.
2. Because the property is a flag lot and located approximately 200 feet from the
nearest public right-of-way, approval of this request should not alter the essential
character of the locality as the proposed six-foot privacy fence will resemble that
of a six-foot fence located on Marc's Restaurant rear property line. Also, this
type of variance is common with other flag lots located within the City.
The physical hardship in this situation would be the topographical difference
between adjacent property to the north and said property. Due to the higher
setting of the residential structure, the applicant is more apt to hear and view the
undesirable situations not normally attributed to a single family neighborhood.
The effect of the height differential was clearly illustrated by the photos
provided by the applicant.
Approval of this request should not be a detriment to the public welfare or
injurious to any public improvements in that the six-foot fence would be located
along the front lot line of a flag lot which has the same physical attributes as a
regular rear lot line. The fence would be located approximately 200 feet from
the nearest right-of way and therefore should not hinder the visibility of
motorists or pedestrians.
5. An existing code-compliant six-foot chain link fence now occurs owned by the
adjacent commercial property and, therefore, there will be no change to the
current fence height.
The motion carried by a vote of 7-0, with Board Member THIESSEN absent.
Chair MAURO advised the applicants that the request had been approved.
D. Case No. WA-98-17: The case, an application by Lorraine Brown for approval of a
variance to Section 26-30 Q to allow a 2' x 2' home business freestanding sign for a
Board of Adjustment Page 11
06/25/98
Class I home occupation and an 8-foot business sign setback variance to the 10-foot
setback requirement for R-1 property located at 4430 Tabor Street, was presented by
Susan Ellis.
Ms. Ellis reviewed the correct surrounding zoning which was erroneously presented in
the staff report: north--Agricultural One; south and east--Residential Three; and west--
Commercial One. She also corrected the surrounding land use as: north--vacant lot;
south and east--multi-family residential; and west--commercial site (Heine's Market).
Ms. Ellis entered the zoning ordinance, case file, packet material and exhibits into the
record. She stated that the property was within the city of Wheat Ridge, all notification
and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction to hear the case.
Ms. Ellis presented a history of this matter and stated that, prior to time of application
for this variance, the applicant had a 2' x 2' advertising sign (similar to a realty sign)
posted on the southwest portion of the driveway. The applicant was under the
assumption that staff had said an advertising sign would be permitted upon issuance of
the business license and placed the sign to advertise her motorcycle photography studio.
This sign remained in place for approximately one year until staff received an
anonymous complaint after which the applicant removed the sign. The location of the
sign did not impair visibility of passing motorists.
Ms. Ellis informed that the area is designated for low density residential and staff had
received comments from property owners in the area that they would protest any future
commercial development in the area. Therefore, due to the inconsistency with the
existing land use map and the fact that neighbors would oppose a rezone to allow a
commercial development, a request for a variance seemed the only viable option.
Ms. Ellis reviewed the site plan and criteria used in evaluating a variance request as
contained in the staff report. She informed that staff concluded the criteria did support
approval of the request. Although it had been stated that approval of the request was
solely for the applicant's benefit, the property is located in a mixed-use neighborhood
on a collector street and would not alter the essential character of the locality. She
presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property.
Board Member ABBOTT asked Ms. Ellis to explain the hardship in this case. Ms. Ellis
replied that the applicant is the only single family residence among multi-family and
commercial uses in the area and they would like some means to let people know where
their business is located.
Lorraine Brown
4430 Tabor
Board of Adjustment Page 12
06/25/98
Ms. Brown, the applicant, was swom by Chair MAURO. She stated that she purchased
the home approximately two years ago specifically to operate the photography studio
(Cycle Colors Motorcycle Portrait Studio) and that she thought all city regulations had
been met. Because of the large amount of commercial uses in the area, she felt the
business blended in with the neighborhood. She stated that she wanted the sign mainly
for a directional sign rather than advertising.
Board member ABBOTT asked if there was an argument to allow a directional sign.
Ms. Ellis replied that the ordinance states, "no signage shall be allowed on the site to
identify a home occupation..." for the purpose of keeping residential character of
neighborhoods, but the question to be considered is whether this is really a residential
neighborhood.
Board member ABBOTT commented that the hardship is associated with operating the
business and not a hardship to the business itself.
Kim Stewart
11700 West 46th Avenue
Ms. Stewart was sworn by Chair MAURO and spoke in favor of the application.
There was no one else signed up to speak on the issue.
Upon a motion by Board Member JUNKER and a second by Board Member
ECHELMEYER the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-98-17 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and there were
no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare
or substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City
of Wheat Ridge.
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-
98-17 be, and hereby is, approved.
Type of Variance: Request for approval of a variance for Section 26-30 of the Wheat
Ridge Code of Laws to allow a 2' x 2' home business freestanding sign for a Class I
Board of Adjustment Paoe 13
06/25/98
home occupation, and an 8-foot business sign variance to the 10-foot business sign
setback requirement.
For the following reasons:
Approval of the request will not alter the essential character of this locality as
Tabor Street is more of a business than residential area.
2. Placement of a sign on the southwest corner of the property will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.
The size of the sign does comply with the maximum residential sign
requirements established in Section 26-410 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws.
Board Member ABBOTT stated that he would vote against the motion based on the fact
that when City Council approved the ordinance they considered the existence of mixed
occupancy neighborhoods but did not create an exclusion for signs of any type. Further,
the hardships stated apply only to the business and the need to advertise rather than a
hardship in meeting an allowable use; therefore, he felt the criteria for granting a
variance had not been met.
Board Member ECHELMEYER commented that, since the single family residential
property is almost completely surrounded by commercial uses, the sign would not
present a negative impact on the neighborhood.
The motion failed by a vote of five in favor and two opposed with Board Member
THIESSEN absent. Board Members ABBOTT and HOWARD voted no.
Chair MAURO advised the applicant that, sihce the motion needed a super majority of
six votes to pass, the application was denied.
E. Case No. WA-98-18: The case, an application by Tom Radigan for approval of a 15-
foot front yard setback variance to the 30-foot front yard setback requirements for Lots
1, 2 and 3 of the Marvel Minor subdivision, zoned R-1 and located at 10845, 10855 and
10865 West 32nd Avenue, was presented by Alan White.
Mr. White informed that three lots are involved in the case: Lot 1 - 15,000 square feet;
Lot 2 - 17,000 square feet; and Lot 3 - 19,000 square feet. He reviewed land use,
surrounding zoning and land use and entered into the record the zoning ordinance, case
file, packet material and exhibits. He also entered the following document into the
record:
Board of Adjustment Page 14
06/25/98
PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST
Case No. LeM p f - /7
Request: 1-6k zi n/i
Date: ' a = F Y-1
~DW cJ - ~ gUcST FD P
L244111AUCiF
7-2) 44z or)
} X Hl7/t9
yy3v
~a ~7
Speaker Name
oP-P-A E
(please print)
Address/Phone In Favor Opposed
~W~Taoop s .
3c>~, -4vo-oN.z9 v
,kll
c ~(6 u
4t
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: June 25, 1998 DATE PREPARED: June 2, 1998
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-98-17/ Brown CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney
ACTION REQUESTED: Request for approval of a variance to Section 26-30 (Q) of the Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws, to allow a 2'x 2' home business freestanding sign for a Class I home occupation, and an
8' business sign setback variance to the 10' business sign setback requirement.
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER:
4430 Tabor Street
Lorraine A. Brown
4430 Tabor Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Same
APPROXIMATE AREA:
PRESENT ZONING:
PRESENT LAND USE:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA:
DATE PUBLISHED:
DATE POSTED:
18,825 square feet
Residential-One
Single-family
N: Commercial-One; S:, E:, Residential-
Three, and W: Restricted-Commercial One
N: Restaurant (commercial), S: and E:
Single-family residential and W: Restaurant
and Multi-family residential
Low Density Residential
June 5, 1998
June 11, 1998
DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: June 3, 1998
ENTER INTO RECORD:
O COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIAL
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE O SLIDES
O SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS
O OTHER
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been
met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a variance to Section 26-30(Q) of the Wheat Ridge Code of
Laws, to allow the placement of a 2'x T home business sign for a Class I Home Occupation, and an 8'
business sign setback variance to the 10' business sign setback requirement. If approved, the sign will be
located at the southwest corner of the driveway 2' from the front property line.
Pursuant to Section 26-30(Q), of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, home occupations are permitted in the
City of Wheat Ridge. Class I home occupations are permitted in all residential districts throughout the
City. However, advertising signs promoting the business are not permitted in Class I home occupations.
Signs are only permitted in Class H home occupations, but Class II home occupations are only permitted
by Special Use Permit and only in the following locations: West 38' Avenue east of Wadsworth; West
44' Avenue, Harlan to Youngfield; Harlan Street from West 38' Avenue to I-70. Because the applicants
are not located on one of the streets mentioned above, they are not eligible to apply for a Class II home
occupation.
Also, the code restricts Class H home businesses to the use of wall or arcade (shingle) signs which are
typically attached to the house. The applicant is hoping to place a 2' x 2' freestanding sign 2' from the
front property line. Pursuant to Section 26-31(13)(7) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, structures
located within the required 15'x 15' driveway sight distance triangle must not exceed 42" in height. The
applicant has stated that the proposed sign will only be 2' (24") tall.
Prior to application for this variance, the applicant had a 2'x 2' advertising sign posted on the southwest
portion of the driveway. The applicant was under the assumption that staff had said an advertising sign
would be permitted upon issuance of the business license and placed the sign to advertise their
Motorcycle photography studio. The sign remained in place for approximately one year, until staff
received an anonymous complaint. The sign was located as not to impair the visibility of passing
motorists. The applicant has since removed the sign.
According to the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan, this area is designated for Low Density residential.
In the past few years, there have been new Commercial developments constructed on Tabor Street, so
the essential character of the neighborhood has changed. Staff has received comments, from the
property owners within the neighborhood, that they would protest any future commercial development in
the area. Therefore, due to the inconsistency with the existing Land Use map, and the fact that the
neighbors would oppose a rezone to allow a commercial development, a request for a variance seems to
be the only viable option.
II SITE PLAN
The property in question is square in shape and measures 132' x 141'. It is located in the Residential-
One zone district, but is in a neighborhood with a mix of land uses including multi-family to the south,
commercial to the west and vacant, Agricultural-One land to the north. The neighborhood further top
the north and east is primarily low density residential with some duplexes and fourplexes.
Land use directly adjacent to Tabor Street has become increasingly more intensive with the inclusion of
commercial developments to the northwest. Tabor Street is classified as a collector street.
III VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located?
Yes. If denied, the property may continue to be used as a single-family dwelling and is permitted
to have a photography studio as a home occupation. However, no outside advertising signs
would not be permitted.
2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances?
No. The plight of the owner is based on the fact that the Code of Laws does not permit
advertising signage for Class I home occupations, and the property is located outside of the areas
where a Class II, sign permitting business, is allowed.
3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
No. Because the property is located in a mixed-use neighborhood, the applicant feels as though
the 2'x 2' sign will not be out of character. Therefore, approval of this request should not alter
the essential character of the locality.
4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished
from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out?
No. As previously stated, this property is a square-shape lot with very little topographical slope.
Therefore, the particular physical shape of the property would result in a particular hardship.
5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable,
generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification?
Yes. All applications are reviewed on a case-by-case basis thereby changing the outcome for
each request.
6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the
property
Yes. The applicant has stated that without a sign, no one would be able to find their photography
studio.
7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property?
Yes. The applicant, who has interest in the property, has created the hardship.
8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located?
No. Approval of this request will allow the placement of a 2'H x 2'W freestanding sign on the
southwest corner of the property, approximately 2' from the right-of-way and with adequate
separation between the adjacent residential structure to the south. Also, because the sign is only
2' tall, it will permit adequate sight visibility for passing motorists and pedestrians, therefore it
should not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties.
9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the
danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property
values within the neighborhood.
No. Because the sign will only be T tall and located at the southwest corner of the property,
approval of this variance should allow for an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent
properties and should not increase the danger of fire. Also, because the sign will not impose on
the required sight distance triangle, approval of this request should not create increase traffic
congestion.
10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be
detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is
also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values
would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an
individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a
reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
No. The proposed request is purely for individual benefit and will not benefit the community or
neighborhood.
VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff concludes that the above criteria does support approval of the request. Although it has been stated
that approval of the request will not benefit the community and is solely for individual benefit, this
property is located in a mixed-use neighborhood on a collector street and therefore should not alter the
essential character of the locality.
VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
Option A: "I move that Case No. WA-98-17, request for approval of a variance to Section 26-30 (Q) of
the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, to allow a 2'x Theme business freestanding sign for a Class I home
occupation, and an 8' business sign setback variance to the 10' business sign setback requirement, for a
property zoned Residential-One and located at 4430 Tabor Street, be APPROVED for the following
reasons:
1. Approval of this request will not alter the essential character of the locality.
2. Placement of the sign, on the southwest corner of the property, will not be detrimental to the
public's health, safety and welfare.
3. The size of the sign does comply with the maximum residential sign requirements established in
Section 26-410(d) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (Freestanding-Residential signs)."
Option B: "I move that Case No. WA-98-17, request for approval of a variance to Section 26-30 (Q) of
the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, to allow a 2'x T home business freestanding sign for a Class I home
occupation, and an 8' business sign setback variance to the 10' business sign setback requirement, for a
property zoned Residential-One and located at 4430 Tabor Street, be DENIED for the following
reasons:
1.
SrPE
OFFICIAL
ZONI N6 MAP
NHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
Last Revision: September lb, 19%
® AREA REQUIRING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
ZONE DISTRICT BOUNDRY
- PARCEL/LOT BOUNDRY
(DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP)
lea CITY LIMIT LINE
WATER FEATURE
• DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
NE 20
O b iM 1ro !M 4y
SCALE 1'-400
OB+ARTMDF OF PLAM W5 AM DDIMOR@R - Z 5-ZM
L:\0FIAWINGS\PLANNING\QS\NE20
10
X UNE pECEPROX 166Dd m
x RA'SU9 OF A PORTION
A P4RCEL OF LAND M THE NOR
TOIVNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RAANCE 69 d
CITY OF MIM-42" RIDGE; COUNTS
SH
w D w 6O
r=5o'
stale IM
" Av 93156-n
NANGIN6 FlLE: -t L-=
fR.E NWE
O/50: MM-22 Sol
NOVCAD B . By 1501
DLH
CAD 6r DLN
Xw C0A4f Of
RECEPTION
06 5766
I~
~ t
w
E,
0i
O
rQ
F
~4lllSHM? f.M
NE cMgR Stcroq A - f0111O mm w
M "ON T RECOND 9Y JONN S. UMBERT•
KS 13212. DATED SEPTEMBER 11. 19114
X 6913'06' E 303.]6 , I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I - FASEMEnT
I I
f 0' )VIDE STRIP HEREBY
DEDICATED TO THE ; k
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE a
' I
I
I I
I
LOT 2
ZONED A-1 i I
AREA = 91096 50. FT.
I i
I I
I
I
t 1d 1J11IJTY,
~EASEMERT
I I
I
S' uirdi"
EASE16bT I
'PT 'i
I
I I I
1
I i I
I
Si
I XOXSE
. HJO TM'R
LOT 1
Zd D R-1
AREA . 18,025 $0. FT.
I I
I
i I
All
I I
i
I I
I I
I I
I ,
I yy■■
I S2
, UlU T
I EASEMENT I
I I
t I
_ _n_-r w_1 _ro._ro' I
rrvr Faar~' I
af}~oX) Mm.~ Lo ce~-rtot
of mil v~
r
s
5 691T30' w 644.23'
rolwr of xcrtwlw
s..c9RXEe io. .J
LES=
SET N0. 3 X 1.0' LIM IRSAR
wITN dLW CAP STAMPED LWREAr OES JR 'SELLARDS Ac Of
NNLENOFEO 0NRw5E1 11
_ (✓•2L1 .V. A;o2o1
_j
n OVJ+'AD
1/A 061
Opt 11GIIM
0.5 tJ3@.
PRO.ECT
MINITY MAP 9TE
aE WHEgT LAND Lor: CASE PROCESSING APPLi,ATION aF WHEAr
Planning and Development Department " m
7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
°ot oR noo Phone (303) 235-2846 cot oR~oo
(Please print or type all information)
Applicant f.L/2Z_4l F_.ik- ~3f /-Address y~l~~ '7'i4131-1= S`t•" Phone 3n3-9ii0-nV
~4`ey. l R c~~
'City e
Owner 1voo Z ioF- A- Y3*oL nJ Address q L(30 S-t" Phone _~63- 9410OqV9
City LL_jkeq~M9_ e-
-Location of request (address) S-Ome
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.)
❑ Change of zone or zone conditions Variance / Waiver
❑ Site development plan approval ❑ Nonconforming use change
❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Flood plain special exception
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ interpretation of Code
❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment
❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group
❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots) ❑ Street Vacation
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final ❑ Other:
Detailed description of the request: 7'0 Al-9cw A ~ ~c~ dome /6,5 N A=SS
1= l~cw'Trk
Fill out the following information to the best of your knowledge.
Current Zoning: fil- " /
Size of Lot (acres or square footage): /88,25' Current use: Situ e" rAm i
Proposed use: s4ke
Assessors Parcel Number:
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf.
Signature of Applicant h~~,C-c
Subscribed and sworn to me this a~A__ day of , 19cl&_
R9S~"~115~~.h~
Notary Public
My commission expires -
Datereceived o5 -ack-cf~ Receipt No. Lt C( (0 Case No. ~
Related Case No. Zoning Quarter Section Map w)C
t1t
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Board
of Adjustment on June 25, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge,
Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written
comments. The following petitions shall be heard: .
Case No. TUP-98-02: An application by Wheat Ridge 52 Investment for approval to
surface an area for use as temporary commercial parking for the tenants of 12060 W. 52"d
Avenue. Said property is zoned A-2 and located at 12060 W. 52nd Avenue.
Case No. WA-98-15: An application by George Feeney and Laura Leprino for approval
to increase lot coverage from 25% to 34% for construction of a single-family dwelling.
Said property is zoned R-1 and located at 3869 Union Court.
3. Case No. WA-98-16: An application by Brad and Marcia Bunger for approval of a two
foot fence line variance adjacent to Marc's Restaurant to screen the property. Said
property is zoned R-3 and located at 6900 W. 38" Avenue.
Case No. WA-98-17: An application by Lorraine Brown for approval of variance to
Section 26-30(Q), Home Occupation Regulations to allow a 2'x2' home business frontal
sign. Said property is zoned R-I and located at 4430 Tabor Street.
Case No. WA-98-18: An application by Tom Radigan for approval of a 15' variance to
the required 30' front yard setback enabling the approved dwelling units to face east
versus south. Said property is zoned R-1 and located at 10845 - 10865 W. 32"d Avenue.
CI~LLYw i Sl(aC~ r~Y,/a,
Barbara Delgadillo, Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City CY k
To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: June 5, 1998
C:\Barbara\BOA\P UBH RGS\980625.wpd
The City of
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713
(303) 234-5900
City Admin. Fax # 234-5924
June 3, 1998
Dear Property Owner:
Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949
~ha at
ge
This is to inform you that Case No. WA-98-17 which is a request for approval of a 2'x 2' home
business frontal sign for the property located at 4430 Tabor Street will be heard by the Wheat
Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500
West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on June 25 at 7:30 p.m.
All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this
hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing
and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other
persons whose presence is desired at this hearing.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at
235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
C:\Barbua\BOA\PUBHRGS\wa9817.wpd
CJ RECYCLED PAPER
D
W
C
AR
a
L
C
N
d
yt
N
c
v
^
-
d
d
2
=
>
d
C
a
D
>
a
'd
d
U
~
d
N
d
A
~ ~ L
p
oo ~
a
=mo
d C ~
~ 0
E
L U
£
U
d
E o m
~
d D c
jq d o
m
r
r
r
r
x~ a
d
U
rn
rn
rn
w
Q m
3
3
3
3
d
`
v
Q
U
_
C
GG
4
~
th
~
~ O
d
V O
f'lr
c~
M
Gr O
°
O
a
ENm
E
NtTp OJ
w
od
d
a
rn
0
O
_
E
LLtn
o ~O
y
U
c m
'
S
U
d o
a
y
d
c 'o
U
a 2 ~
v
C
S to s
9
r
in
m~K
Z
aV-do
~
~
-
m
V
y
d
m
tit
L
H~ o
N
~
to Q
m a
d
~ V LL
>
N"O
L
~
Q
aK c
i
N ~ d rn
-2 2?
C
d
a w o
l
sU U LLw
z
m
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑
d
2
w ~
N
Q
N
N
N
M
C
o
m
to
m
to
CO
`d
m
m
c°o
°m
W O
E
U
'
Z
wQw
c!
.
LL C
O Q
a
oW
0
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
nn INVOICE
NAME ~l~ 141 DATE: 5 Q -Cl
CASENO.
FEE TYPE
FEE
CHARGE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
Application Submittal
See Fee Schedule
a °
01-550-01-551
Publications/Notices
See Fee Schedule
5n
01-550-02-551
24" x 36" Blue Line
$ 3.25
01-550-04-551
24" x 36" Mylar Copy
$ 6.00
01-550-04-551
Single Zoning Map
$ 2.00
01-550-04-551
Set of Zoning Maps
$20.00
01-550-04-551
11" x 17" Color Map
$ 5.00
r
01-550-04-551
Comp. Plan Maps
$ 5.00 ea.
01-550-04-551
Comp. Plan Book w/Map
$25.00
01-550-04-551
Fruitdale Valley Master Plan
$ 2.50
01-550-04-551
Subdivision Regulations
$ 4.50
01-550-04-551
Zoning Ordinance
$15.00 (does not
include annual updates)
01-550-04-551
Copies
$.15/page
01-550-04-551
Copy of Meeting Tapes
$25.00/tape
01-550-04-551
Miscellaneous:
01-550-04-551
TOTAL COST:
eAplmn ingWormAinvoice