Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUP-04-0411200 W. 32nd Avenue • Wheat Ridge; CO 80033 Phone 303-232-9575 Fax 303-238-25:13 James E. Moorhead - Architect 9731 Cypress Point Circle Lone Tree CO 50 1 243 1 03 April 28, 2005 Ms. Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80216 Re: Special Use Permit- New Education Building Applewood Baptist Church 11200 West 32nd Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Meredith: (303) 790-8065 Please be advised that the above referenced project was canceled on April 22, 2005 by the owner. The design team for the project retains the ownership of all design documents and the owner is not free to use them for the above referenced project or any other project they may pursue. We ask that any submittal documents in the City's possession be either destroyed or returned to us. I appreciate your attention to this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, James E. Moorhead, Architect JEM:cam 0 December 9, 2004 Dear Meridith Reckert, I am writing to you out of a genuine concern over the proposed expansion of the Baptist church at 32nd and Quail, case # SUP 04-04. As a homeowner intent on preserving home values and neighborhoods, I strongly object to any rezoning to allow for this major expansion. This is an area of comfortable, well-kept homes, with a distinctive neighborhood flavor. The RI zoning of the area is most inappropriate for a 28,000 sq ft building, plus a 31 sq ft building, plus wall to wall asphalt for a mega parking lot, plus Wall Mart type lighting for the parking lot. The additional traffic generated by such a usage expansion would be tremendous on an already over burdened 32"d avenue. The church does not pay taxes, the homeowners do. If home values in the area are depreciated due to the adverse impact of the church expansion, all of Wheat Ridge suffers as property tax return to the city is reduced; a situation nobody wants, or can afford. Commercial areas would better serve the churches desire for a huge expansion. I appreciate your consideration, and sincerely hope that the residential area is kept as it was intended to be---residential. Sheila Bardwell 3445 Simms St. Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Page 1 of 2 Meredith Reckert From: Pete Klammer [pklammer@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:01 PM To: k.gault@att.net Cc: Meredith Reckert Subject: RE: Hi Kathryn - just spoke with Meredith; she says the partway expected a refiling already a couple months ago, the last time I spoke with her, but hasn't heard anything from them since. She says one of their engineers was by for business with a different client, and he also hadn't heard any news. I've CC'd this to her, too, to correct any of my mis- paraphrasing, and so you'll have her e-mail address handy. We've had 9 or ten showings since listing very very slow and we repriced, below the magic "5" number, to $499,999.99 and 9/10 or something like that. You should see it since we've done the granite and tile and stuff! Or look at http: //www.ultimateTeamServices.com/100245348. I expect the best activity after the trees have budded, or even better once the pool across the street is open. The only item of note in the ABC "@Applewood" newsletter is Pastor Wittman has moved to a new house (so now we know he won't be buying ours...). I'm looking at http://www.app!ewoodbaptist.com/, and I don't see anything of note there, either. The link "The Education Building Project' has for news the neighborhood meeting "Tuesday, April 13, 2004," and (still) says, If we do not obtain a building permit we may explore other options. For example, selling the property to a school for their use is one option. In addition, we have been approached by real estate developers. We may consider selling the property for development and moving the church to a new location. No news is good news, I suppose Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970), IEEE(SA,P1583), ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE) 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@ACM.ore "Either Be Good, or Else Be Careful, but Do Have Fun! " From: k.gault@att.net [mailto:k.gault@att.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:22 AM To: Pete Klammer Subject: Hi Pete, How's the house selling going? Have you had any contact with Meredith lately, if not would you contact her to see what's going on with ABC? Has there been any mention of progress in the monthly news letter about their building project? Thanks, 4/14/2005 Meredith Reckert From: tomov258@netzero.net Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 8:00 AM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: ABC Church - comment from AFRV member Dear Meredith, Did you see the article in last Sunday's USA Weekend Oct. 29-31, 2004. It was entitled "The New Houses of God, Coming to a church near you: skate parks, coffee bars and video sermons." In essence it states what we are concerned about: "Like a shopping mall in which there is a quantity of stuff for prices that can't be beat, (attendees) see church as theater." These new megachurches defy the regular definition of church. The article continues: "The result: religious centers, some open all week, that resemble sports complexes or shopping centers more than traditional churches." Many congregations are looking for a "Disney-style experience, says Fort Worth builder Greg Baron, who lists lobby cafes and rec-style clubs for teens among the most popular add-ons." Meredith, allowing this to happen to Applewood would be a disaster, but as they have stated in their comments, ABC says the bigger the better. As they inch their way to this campus/theater education/entertainment center, the quietude and beauty of our entire area is threatened. Bottom line this is closer to, as my husband wrote for the Sentinel, inserting a mall into a residential neighborhood. Please let me know when this might come up to council. We are counting on you to buck this tide which diminishes the church like values of quietude and sanctity which make our own homes places of spiritual refreshment. Christine Tomovich Lakewood Resident i KLAMMER PETE, CINDY, BRYAN, & JEREMY October 24, 2004 City Lakewood Planning Department Traffic Department Fire Department To Whom It May Concern: This letter concerns present and planned land and traffic use by Applewood Baptist Church, a Colorado corporation headquartered in Lakewood ("Corporation"). I represent an informal organization of Lakewood and Wheat Ridge neighbors, Applewood Families for Residential Values ( AFRV"). The ABC corporation has submitted expansion plans at Wheat Ridge Community Development, and requested a Special Use Permit for exemption from the low-density residential zoning of its land across 32nd Avenue from the Lakewood enterprise. The Corporation has two meeting halls in Lakewood, one larger with an estimated seating capacity of 1500 (including balcony), and the other with estimated seating capacity of 350. Additionally, there are offices and classroom spaces in Lakewood. Does any Lakewood department have record or license of usage or occupancy for these buildings? The Corporation holds large-attendance meetings in these buildings regularly several times a week, and on additional special days, and conducts ongoing business seven days a week, typically 7 AM to 10 PM. Does Lakewood impose any requirement on the Corporation to provide private (off- street) parking for these activities? If so, by what rule or formula is the number of parking places determined? If so, what is the most recent number, and when was it determined? If so, how is it enforced? Are Lakewood's requirements for the Corporation's parking needs completely satisfied by land use in Lakewood? Are any of Lakewood's requirements for the Corporation's parking needs supplemented by land use in Wheat Ridge? If so, who in Wheat Ridge has been informed of this encumbrance? If so, what would or could Lakewood do if the Wheat Ridge parking capacity became unavailable? Does Lakewood allow any of its land usage to be encumbered by zoning or occupancy requirements of adjacent municipalities? If so, what documentation or agreements are customary or required? I am also a member of a Applewood Knolls Swim and Tennis Club (AKSTC"), although not an officer. AKSTC holds swimming meets and lessons throughout the summer, and tennis meets and lessons all year long; the patronage parks on both sides of 32nd Avenue, and includes residents from both sides as well. I would like to propose that AKSTC obtain for its pedestrian patrons the same advantages that the Corporation does, by purchasing and deploying fluorescent cones, temporary signs, flares, flashers, hand-held stopsigns, reflector vests, etc. Before I make such a -2- October 24, 2004 proposal to AKSTC members and board, I would like to have Lakewood's guidance, recommendations, rules and ordinances that apply to incidental pedestrian crossing zones set up at the discretion of street residents. Furthermore, can private individuals deploy such arrangements during e.g. yard or garage sales? Do the rules allow a commercial enterprise e.g. Walgreen's to base the majority of its parking on the opposite side of 32nd Avenue, and "cone up" a crossing zone three or five times a week during its "busy" shopping periods? With the Corporation's expansion project to significantly increase parking on the Wheat Ridge side of 32nd Avenue, while maintaining the location of its ever-increasing meeting activities on the Lakewood side, does Lakewood have any plan to deal with an ever-increasing pedestrian burden across 32nd Avenue? We would like to have Lakewood Traffic Department respond to neighbors' concerns that ad- hoc orange-coned pedestrian zones "steal" neighborhood safety for the benefit of the Corporation's patrons. It seems that when there is an uncommonly attention-getting, brightly-flashing, sign- waving arrangement in the middle of the street a few blocks ahead, drivers are distracted to focus on that spectacle, and have less focus or attention for peripheral activity nearby, thus endangering pedestrians, children, pets, etc., who are in the blocks leading up to the eye-catching setup. We would like to have Lakewood Traffic Department respond to neighbors' concerns that temporary traffic-impeding crossing zones distort traffic speed patterns, and thus shift safety from the neighborhood to their patrons, since we have observed drivers have an unfortunate tendency to "make up" lost time after passing through the privately-imposed speed impediment. Please indulge this hypothetical question, since planning is by and large a hypothetical undertaking: consider a project of scale similar to the Corporation, which would propose to arrange event attendance space for 1000-2000 patrons on one side of the street, and 500-1000 parking spaces on the other side of the street, but with both sides under jurisdiction of Lakewood. What factors would Lakewood apply to approve or deny application for such a project? More specifically, if the current or proposed configuration of the Corporation were proposed today straddling Youngfield, or 20th, or 26th, or some other street or avenue similar to 32nd Avenue, what principles would Lakewood apply in it's approval or denial? When a project straddles a major thoroughfare, as the Corporation's expansion does on 32nd Avenue, does Lakewood have ordinance, policy, or guidance rules to consider the project as a whole, rather than piecemeal one side at a time? When a project comprises properties in two or more municipalities, in Lakewood as well as another adjacent jurisdiction, does Lakewood have any ordinance, policy, or guidance rules to handle land-use issues such as zoning, planning, permitting, occupancy, safety, etc., jointly with the neighboring municipality, treating the project as a whole within the project's boundaries, rather than piecemeal in the separate jurisdictional boundaries? We are opposed to the Corporation's expansion project. The burden and impact of their activity, present as well as proposed, presents a burden and infringement upon our quiet enjoyment of our homes and residential neighborhood life. We have tolerated ongoing and ever-increasing levels of activity, noise, traffic, light, and insecurity, on a temporary basis with the understanding, per their published newsletter two years ago, that they were searching for a new, larger location. The -3- October 24, 2004 point of this being that our tolerance should not be gauged as resignation or acceptance of the Corporation's footprint in our neighborhood, but rather a generous and patient accommodation intended to facilitate their eventual relocation without stress or rancor. With these things in mind, I would welcome any and all comments, recommendations, or suggestions any of you might have, officially or privately, to help us maintain and extend the residential neighborhood qualities around our Applewood homes. Sincerely, Pete Klammer Applewood Families for Residential Values 3200 ROOTT STREET WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO • 80033-5452 PHONE: 303-233-9485 E-MAIL: THEKLAMMERS@BIGEOOT.COM Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Ralph Perri [perri@rmi.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 10:07 PM To: awhite@ci.wheatridge.co.us Cc: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Church information September 22, 2004 Dear Mr. White: I received your letter addressing my questions regarding the Applewood Baptist Church's application for a Special Use Permit to construct an additional education building. Thank you for answering my question regarding the requested size of the proposed building and the reason the City only requires one neighborhood meeting. It was our thought that if you changed the plan that was originally presented to the neighbors that you would need to inform the neighbors of the new and modified plan through another neighborhood meeting. This way, the neighbors would be properly informed. It is good to know the rule for neighborhood meetings for this project and how it will apply to all future applications. I will pass this information along to the many interested neighbors that are also very concerned. Thank you for the information and I appreciate your prompt reply Sincerely, Ralph Perri 9/23/2004 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 September 29, 2004 Applewood Baptist Church B.D. Deardorff 11200 W. 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Mr. Deardorff. The City of Wheat Ridge This letter is in response to your application for approval of a Special use permit to allow expansion of a church on R-1 zoned property located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue in the City of Wheat Ridge. Because you are the contact person for the land use case, please make sure the continents are provided to the various members of the design team. I have reviewed the submittal package and have the following comments on the different plan components. SITE PLAN 1. Include a vicinity map. 2. Show the entirety of the property including the flood plain area. 3. Add a legal description, which matches the consolidation plat. 4. Show the location of the 100-year floodplain. 5. Will there be any fencing? Please show location, height and materials of existing and proposed fencing. 6. Is any additional signage proposed? If so, show location and size. 7. Show the location of dumpsters and proposed method of screening. 8. Modify the site data breakdown to include the following categories for the existing and proposed conditions: building coverage, landscaped coverage, other open space (natural landscaped coverage), and coverage by parking and other hard surfaces. All categories should be shown in square footage and percentage of total site. For building coverage, separate out the multi-purpose/education building coverage from the building "connector" coverage. 9. Show the total gross floor areas for the existing and proposed conditions. Please include gross square footage for the existing structure, the new multi-purpose/education structure and the "connector" space. 10. Expand the parking breakdown to show how the required formulas and calculations were done'for the existing and proposed conditions. 11. Add a signature line for the Community development director. 12. At least one of the eight required handicapped spaces must be a van space served with an 8' wide aisle. 13. Add a "Notes" section. 14. Under "Notes", discuss existing zoning and site development conditions. 15. Under "Notes", discuss proposed changes. 16. Add a case history box with the following case numbers: WV-93-6, CUP-96-1, CUP-97- 3, MS-04-01, SUP-04-04 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. Add a chart showing total amount of landscaping provided (in square footage and percent of total site) with a breakdown of living landscaping, non-living landscaped coverages and natural areas (areas of no disturbance). 2. Add the following note: "All formal landscaping will be served by a fully automatic, high efficiency irrigation system." 3. Identify the type of turf to be used in the sodded areas. Staff would recommend using a low water usage variety instead of Kentucky bluegrass. 4. A row of four Emerald Green Maples running along the western property line is labeled Schwedler's Maples. Please correct. 5. Are all unlabeled plant materials shown in "half-tone" to remain? Clarify with a note. 6. The floodplain labeling on the north portion of the site includes a reference to note 2. Either remove the reference or add a note 2. 7. Please change the title of this document from final development to landscape plan. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1. Show the type of light standards to be used in the new parking lot. This should include information regarding height of standards, type (i.e., cutoff) and shielding devices. Please note that the height limitation for light poles in this zone district is 12'. 2. Are the standards in the existing parking area and around the building being modified? Please clarify with a note. 3. Add the following note: "Lighting shall be consistent with the provisions of Section 26- 503 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws." ELEVATION SHEETS 1. Add measuring scales to all elevation sheets. 2. Add a note relative to the building height definition in the zoning and development code. The vertical distance measured from the average elevation of the finished grade to the highest segment of the structure, measured midway between peak and eave line cannot exceed 35'. My calculations based on our definition appear that the structure is up to 40' in height. Please clarify. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Please provide the following supplementary information: 1. A weekly schedule of activities in all buildings with an average attendance. 2. Location of residence by city for the current membership. 3. Current membership total and anticipated growth for the next 20 years. 2 Attached are referrals received from other city departments and outside agencies. Public Works Department: See attached letter from Dave Brossman dated September 24, 2004. -A red-lined document set and drainage plan are also included. Northwest Lakewood Sanitation district: See attached letter from Bill Willis, district engineer, dated August 31, 2004. Consolidated Mutual Water District: See attached letter from Michael Queen dated August 30, 2004. Wheat Ridge Building Division: See attached response from Chad Root. City of Lakewood: See attached email from Chad Minor dated September 21, 2004. This concludes the summary of comments. Please address each of these comments by revising the drawings accordingly. For clarification on any of these issues, please feel free to contact any of the Development Review committee members: Community Development Meredith Reckert 303-235-2848 Public Works Dave Brossman 303-235-2868 Traffic Engineering Steve Nguyen 303-235-2862 Once the changes have been made, please submit five copies of revised plan sheets and technical documents plus original redmarks. If you have any questions or need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235- 2848. Sincerely, t r i Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner cc: ;Case No. ~T)P-04-04 Dave Brossman 09T RIDGt Rt PRIME HIRT P.O. Box 507 3880 Upham Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034 (303) 424-7323 Community Development Attn: Meredith Reckert 7500 West 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: Site plan for 11200 West 32nd, Applewood Baptist Church The following requirements are made under the 1997 Uniform Fire Code but may be subject to the 2003 International Fire Code barring adoption by the City Council of Wheat Ridge. 1. Hydrants shall be provided at the entrances to the site as well as the existing on the plans. 2. Turning radius for fire apparatus is attached to this form and shall be available through out the site. 3. Complete sets of drawings shall be submitted to the Fire District for approval. 4. These building shall be fully protected with a Fire Alarm system as well as a Fire Sprinkler system. (Both shall be addressable and monitored.) 5. Fire Department connections on the building shall have unobstructed clearance at all times. 6. All building plans shall be submitted and approved prior to any construction at the site. 7. A type II stand Pipe system may be required. (Note that this will be determined on submittal of building plans.) Additional requirements will be made when building plans are submitted. Res lly su9e Douglas Saba Fire Marshal WHEAT RIDGE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PO BOX 507 • 3880 UPHAM STREET • WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80034-0507 303.4035900 • FAX 303-940-0350 • WWW.WRFIRE.ORG SYSTEM INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ATTENTION ALL CONTRACTORS Prior To Your Request For A Final Inspection The Following Conditions Must Be Met! 1. All of the required paper work and permits are present and on-site. 2. You must have the appropriate tools and devices to activate the various circuits of the system. 3. You must have sufficient personnel and equipment-(€lom the permit holder company) to perform the desired tests (someone to test the devices and some one to reset the system). If radios are needed they to must be provided by the permit holder. 4. You must notify all appropriate personnel and other occupants of the building as to when the fire alarm system will be tested. Consider posting signs giving information regarding testing. 5. All devices (strobes, horns, annunciators etc...) must be tested prior to your request for final inspection. 6. The fire alarm communicator must be connected to two (2) active phone lines and the detection system is on-line with the monitoring station. 7. The permit holder is responsible for the proper installation and operation of the alarm system for the area permitted. 8. The Knox Box (if applicable) must be on order or installed at the time of the inspection. The acceptance of the detection or sprinkler system is based upon field verification. It is the responsibility of the permit holder to insure that all of the permit requirements are met. Failure to meet the permit requirements will result in a denial of inspection and a re-inspection fee will be assessed. I understand that by signing this form, I agree to meet the listed conditions for the System Inspection Requirements. I also agree to perform a 100% functionality test on the entire alarm or sprinkler system and correct any problems that are found to insure that the system meets all of the requirements of this permit. I understand that failure to comply with any of these conditions or if any other discrepancies are found at the time of testing by the testing Fire Marshal or his designee, will result in a RE-INSPECTION FEE OF $100.00 PER SITE. Signature: _ Print Name: Date: Permit Number: PLANNING & PW Fax:3032352857 -V~i< raLnsm i t Con-F _ Reps..-t >1>k P.1 Oct 4 2004 1126 Location Mode Start Time Page Result Note 93032382513 NORMAL 10/ 4,11:26 1'00" 3 * O K ~y wl+~ar9~ City of Wheat Midge OtOftA Fax Tra! S itta' 7500 West 2e Avenue • Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Planning: (303) 235-2846 Building: (303) 235-2855 Engineering: (303) 235-2861 FAX: (303) 235-2857 Web Site: www,ci.wheatrid e.ca.us DATE /0-2 -0`F Name: -D ✓~o r~ Organization: Fax:. 3~3 - 2S! 3 Phone: From: e re-cl r -rK Division: Planning Ig Building ❑ Engineering ❑ Subject: ►-V- - # of Pages: (including cover pa e) Comments: re. cei v e d Y:15 m er✓~ t 4w a MARTIN /MARTIN px+"'0j CONSULTING ENGINEERS August 31, 2004 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29`s Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Attn: Meredith Reckert rwRe: Community Development Referral - SUP-04-04/Applewood Baptist Church located at 11225 West 32Dd Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert, On behalf of the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District, Martin/Martin Inc. acting as the District Engineer, offers the following in response to the referenced Community Development Referral dated August 26, 2004: The existing building is currently provided with sanitary sewer service by the mainline within West 32"d Avenue along the south side of the property. If the new building is separate from the existing building, the new building will require a separate sanitary sewer service line to the existing sanitary sewer main within West 32"d Avenue. The sanitary sewer service requires a cleanout be constructed 5 feet outside of the new building and every 100 feet of service length. The sanitary sewer service will not require an easement. If the new building is in fact an addition to the existing building (expansion to the existing building), a separate sanitary sewer service is not required. The owner is responsible for construction and maintenance of the sanitary sewer service from building to main. A grease trap may be required if a kitchen/cafeteria is incorporated within the new building. The Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District must review and approve construction plans that involve food service. Appropriate development fees based on the final design are the responsibility of the Developer (Owner). Please call our office if there are any questions, Sincerely Bill W~l ts, District Engineer Cc: Special District Management Services - Kammy Tinney 12499 WEST COLFAX AVENUE • P.O. BOX 151 500 ~ LAKEWOOD. COLORADO 60215 , 303.431.61 00 ONSOLIDATED mutual water y b August 30, 2004 n Ms. Meredith Reckert, Case Manager City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 2e Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: City of Wheat Ridge Case Number SUP-04-04/Applewood Baptist Church for the Expansion of the Church Addressed as 11225 West 32nd Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert: This will acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated August 26, 2004 regarding the above referenced property. Our comments remain the same as in prior correspondence. We have no additional comments or changes for the above referenced project. If you should have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact this office. Sincerely, Qu Executive Vice President /cc cc: Walter S. Welton, CMWCo President Greg M. Stroeder, CMWCo Water Distribution Manager John M. Allen, CMWCo Project Engineer Neal A. Santangelo, CMWCo Project Engineer THE CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 12700 West 27th Avenue • P.O. Box 150068 • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 Telephone (303)238-0451 • Fax (303)237-5560 Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2845 Fax: 303.235.2857 The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Referral Form I Date: August 26, 2004 Response Due: September 17, 2003 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a special use permit with a site plan to allow expansion of a church in an R-1 zone district at the property located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal Case No.: SUP-04-04IApplewood Baptist Church Request: Approval of a special use permit with a site plan for expansion of a church in an R-1 zone district. The property is approximately 14.67 acres in size. The specific request is to allow for construction of a three-story education building with a footprint of 12,000 square feet. The extent of construction includes expansion of existing parking areas and relocation of an existing detention pond. Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. If you need further FlariS, ion contact the caagma/na er. / ,~f /t g4. Ilb l a~~, ~..sll'a31ar~•f ua'StCr., a. J. Case Manager. Meredith Racked Voice: 303.235.2848 Fax: 303.235.2857 Email: mreckert®ci.wheatridge.co.us DISTRIBUTION: Water District (Consolidated Mutual) Sanitation District (Northwest Lakewood) Fire District (Wheat Ridge) Adjacent City (Lakewood) Jefferson County Planning Department Xcel Energy Owest Communications Colorado Department of Transportation Denver Regional Council of Governments JeffCo Health Department JeffCo Schools JeffCo Commissioners AT&T Broadband Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Regional Transportation District Wheat Ridge Post Office Wheat Ridge Police Department Wheat Ridge Public Works Wheat Ridge Parks & Recreation Department Whigat Ridge Forestry Division Nheat Rkige Building Division Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority "The Carnation City" Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Chad Minor [ChaMin@lakewood.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:17 AM To: 'Mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us' Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Church q-ai Original Message--- From: Toni Spurgeon Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 4:29 PM To: Chad Minor Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Church ----Original Message--- From: Karl Buchholz Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:50 PM To: John Padon Cc: Toni Spurgeon Subject: Applewood Baptist Church John, Here are my comments for the above referenced referral from Wheat Ridge: 1. All of the new parking spaces will be significantly further from the church than on-street parking in the neighborhood. How does the church plan to mitigate parking in the neighborhoods south of 32nd Avenue? 2. The church's parking lot access on Robb Circle should be closed. This lot only has 115 spaces, which can adequately be served by the access on 32nd Avenue. Removing the access on Robb Street will help to keep the church traffic on 32nd Avenue and reduce the potential for vehicles parking in the neighborhood. 3. The north parking lot access should be aligned midway between Robb Circle and the south parking lot driveway to minimize left-tum conflicts. 4. The traffic study supplement (dated 8/27/2004) does not show how the 20-year traffic projections were derived. What assumptions were used for church growth and background traffic growth? 5. The church has quite a few activities that take place on Wednesday evening from 5:00 to 8:00 pm. The traffic study should include an evaluation of the adjacent street (32nd) peak period for the 2-year and 20-year traffic horizons. 6. The traffic study states that the new education building will be approximately 11,000 SF in size. Other planning documents indicate the size will be closer to 30,000 SF. Please confirm the correct size. Also, will the new education building increase the amount of eventstactivities during Wednesday evening and other weekday time periods? If so, this increase should be included in the weekday analysis. Karl city ofWhesstEdge \ I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 Department of Public Works 7500 WEST 2e AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 September 24, 2004 Mr. Gary D. Theander, P.E. Mountain States Engineering, Inc. 12860 W. Cedar Drive, Suite 102 Lakewood, CO 80228 Re: - First Review Comments of Preliminary Drainage Report/Plan, Site Plan, and 2Bd Review of the Traffic Impact Study. Dear Mr. Theander, I have completed the review of the above referenced documents for the Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Project received on August 27, 2004 and have the following comments: Preliminary Drainage Report 1. The Preliminary Drainage Plan provides sufficient information to show intent to make the drainage function for this site. All specific technical review comments will be made at the time of submittal of the Final Drainage Report. Site Plan 1. Please show the property boundary that is involved with this development, including all applicable bearings and distances. 2. Show all existing and proposed easements. 3. Include a vicinity map. 4. Need to show the Legal Description as shown on the Final Plat. 5. Show the flood plain. Other/Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat will need to be modified to include a Stormwater Detention Easement that shall entirely encompass the proposed detention pond. Standard City of Wheat Ridge detention/retention pond easement language shall be added to the Final Plat. 2. The detention pond outfall pipe and receiving drainage ditch will also require drainage easements. Therefore, Drainage Easements for these two facilities shall be added to the Final Plat as well. The ditch easement needs to run all of the way to Lena Gulch. Traffic Engineering A copy of the Traffic Impact Study was forwarded to the Engineering Division Manager, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E., 303-235-2862 for review, and the following is his response: I have reviewed the Letter of Response, dated August 27, 2004, to the above traffic impact study Applewood Baptist Expansiou_ reviewl.ltr and have the following comments. Since the proposed west access will function similar to an offset intersection with Robb Street Please allow adequate distance to minimize left turn conflicts. A discussion is needed to address this configuration in terms of traffic operation and safety. The offset distance shall be at least 150 feet. The current site plan does not indicate such. 2. Traffic counts and LOS analyses will need to be included for the intersection of Quail and Robb at 32nd Avenue since they are part of church traffic circulation and access. These analyses for the intersections and driveways does not account for the traffic delay as a result for the concurrent pedestrian activity on 32°d Avenue. Please field-verify and discuss the magnitude and its impacts. 3. Please indicate other time of the week when the facility has a significant use. Include traffic figures if they considered significant for analysis. Our information indicated that Wednesday night activity is significant that uniform traffic control is utilized. Please provide traffic data and discuss the capacity and operations in the report. 4. City of Lakewood comment #2. The church's parking lot access on Robb Circle should be closed. This lot only has 115 spaces, which can adequately be served by the access on 32nd Avenue. Removing the access on Robb Street will help to keep the church traffic on 32nd Avenue and reduce the potential for vehicles parking in the neighborhood." This requirement will have implications on traffic operations on 32nd Avenue, traffic pattern in the area and current emergency access to the church facility. The closure will not necessary guarantee that parking problem on Robb Circle will be eliminated. 5. The traffic generation table provided in the study supplement dated 8/27/2004 does not show how the 20-year traffic projections were derived as to how they are related to the church growth information provided. 6. Please discuss the current and future traffic control for pedestrian activities on 32°d Avenue. It is our understanding that the pedestrian crossing is a major activity on 32°d Avenue. The Public Works Department requires 2 signed and stamped copies of the Final Drainage Report/Plan, Site Plan, and Final Plat. Please provide these with the next submittal. Public Improvement Agreement Upon City approval of the Final Development (or Site) Plan, a Public Improvement Agreement (PIA) will need be executed by the project owner/developer. The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department will provide the PIA to the project owner/developer. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Performance Guarantee (Letter of Credit) Prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the 32°d Avenue Right-of-Way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted to the Public Works Applewwd Baptist Expansion_reviewl.ltr Department for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, an Irrevocable Letter of Credit reflecting the total of the approved cost estimate plus 25% (125% of engineer's estimate) shall be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval. The Letter of Credit and PIA (see above) are generally submitted simultaneously, and may accompany the Building Permit Application. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of public improvements lying within the public right-of-way, the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and any easement or ROW dedications. Please return all redlined plans with the next submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner File ApplewoW Baptist Expansion_ reviewl.ltr Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Chad Minor [ChaMin@lakewood.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:17 AM To: 'Mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us' Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Church V3i -----Original Message----- From: Toni Spurgeon Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 4:29 PM To: Chad Minor Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Church -----Original Message----- From: Karl Buchholz Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:50 PM To: John Padon Cc: Toni Spurgeon Subject: Applewood Baptist Church John, Here are my comments for the above referenced referral from Wheat Ridge: 1. All of the new parking spaces will be significantly further from the church than on-street parking in the neighborhood. How does the church plan to mitigate parking in the neighborhoods south of 32nd Avenue? 2. The church's parking lot access on Robb Circle should be closed. This lot only has 115 spaces, which can adequately be served by the access on 32nd Avenue. Removing the access on Robb Street will help to keep the church traffic on 32nd Avenue and reduce the potential for vehicles parking in the neighborhood. 3. The north parking lot access should be aligned midway between Robb Circle and the south parking lot driveway to minimize left-turn conflicts. 4. The traffic study supplement (dated 8/27/2004) does not show how the 20-year traff ic projections were derived. What assumptions were used for church growth and background traffic growth? 5. The church has quite a few activities that take place on Wednesday evening from 5:00 to 8:00 pm. The traffic study should include an evaluation of the adjacent street (32nd) peak period for the 2-year and 20-year traffic horizons. 6. The traffic study states that the new education building will be approximately 11,000 SF in size. Other planning documents indicate the size will be closer to 30,000 SF. Please confirm the correct size. Also, will the new education building increase the amount of events/activities during Wednesday evening and other weekday time periods? If so, this increase should be included in the weekday analysis. Karl 9/21/2004 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge September 20, 2004 Mr. Ralph Perri 1090 Holland St. Lakewood, Colorado 80215-4718 Dear Mr. Perri: This letter is in response to your hand-delivered letter and email correspondence concerning the Special Use Permit application of the Applewood Baptist Church. The information contained in your letter about the size of the building is not accurate. The first plan presented in November 2003 to the neighborhood showed the building footprint at 11,340 square feet. No figure was provided for gross floor area. The second plan, shown to the neighborhood in April 2004, showed a 12,000 square foot building footprint, with a gross floor area of 29,000 square feet. The plan submitted with the special use permit application shows a 12,098 square foot building footprint, with a gross floor area of 28,840 square feet. In all three plans the proposed building has been three stories. In response to the last neighborhood meeting, the orientation and location of the building have changed. The building still connects with the existing building, but rather than extending north, it extends west to essentially face 32°d Avenue. As a result of this reorientation, the parking lot and detention pond have been moved to the north of the relocated building. These are not significant changes. It is normal for plans to change after neighborhood meetings, as in this case, in response to neighborhood concerns. The Special Use Permit process requires noticing of adjacent landowners to allow those owners the opportunity to review the plans and file written objections to the request. If objections are received, the request will be scheduled for a Council hearing. We are not at the point of sending notices to adjacent landowners. The application is still under review and additional information likely will need to be submitted. We are concerned about traffic, drainage and lighting as I know the neighborhood is. The special use process requires one neighborhood meeting and that requirement has been met for this application. We have not made any other applicant conduct an additional neighborhood meeting due to design modifications. Mr. Ralph Perri Page 2 9/20/2004 The assertion that the Church is being given special and preferential treatment is simply unfounded and untrue. We are following the Special Use Permit procedure as the Zoning and Development Code prescribes. Requiring the Church to have another neighborhood meeting would be fabricating a requirement that does not exist in the regulations and which no other applicant has had to do. That would be special treatment. As an adjacent owner, you will be notified when the application is officially under the 10-day review period for adjacent owners. The final plans being considered for the Special Use Permit will be available for review at that time. Of course, the plans we have now and the case file can be reviewed anytime. Sincerely, A, Alan C. White, AICP Community Development Director cc: Randy Young, City Manager Jerry Dahl, City Attorney Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert [mreckertfci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 11:26 AM To: Alan White Subject: ABC This email is in response to an email/letter from Ralph Perri dated September 15, 2004. In Mr. Perri's email, he indicates that the plan has been modified from what was originally proposed by an increase in the size of the building from 28,000 square feet to 36,000 square feet. Also, that the site has been redesigned to relocate the building, parking and detention facilities. The original concept of the new building addition was for a 11,340 square foot footprint (measuring 70' x 162') which extended north from the original education building. This measurement is only for the usable multi-purpose space, not the connector area between the two structures. This is the design that was presented to staff at the March 13, 2003 pre- application meeting and shown to the neighbors at the November 18, 2003 neighborhood meeting. At the second neighborhood meeting held on April 13, 2004, the footprint of the new structure was slightly increased to 12,000 square feet with a total square footage of 29,000 square feet (first floor = 12,000 s.f.+ second floor = 12,000 s.f.+ third floor = 5000 s.f.). The plan showed the same basic layout with the addition extending north from the existing structure along the eastern property line. I was not provided a "to scale" drawing so cannot respond to the exact measurements of the building footprint. Once again, the 12,000 square foot footprint did not include the "connector" between the two structures. The plan submitted with the special use application shows a footprint of 12,098 square feet (measuring 70' x 172.83')for the multi-purpose/education structure. This coverage does not include the "connector" floor area. I do not have a breakdown of actual square footage of the three stories combined with the connector square footage for a total gross floor area. This is something I am asking for in the second submittal. The present plan has been revised to reorient the new building/addition away from the eastern property to the west, parallel with W. 32nd Avenue. Because of the reorientation, the drainage pond and parking lot were redesigned and/or relocated. 1 Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert [mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 2:38 PM To: Alan White Subject: ABC follow-up Alan- I just got off the phone with the project architect. The proposed gross floor area of the new building (excluding connection areas) is 28,840 square feet (first floor = 12,040 s.f. + second floor = 12,040 s.f. + third floor = 4760 s.f.). In summary: first plan (shown to staff at March '03 pre-app and to neighborhood at 11-03 meeting: 11,340 s.f. footprint no figure given for gross floor area of new building at that time second plan (shown to neighborhood at 4-04 meeting): 12,000 s.f. footprint 29,000 s.f. gross floor area third plan (submitted with SUP application): 12,098 s.f. footprint 28,840 s.f. gross floor area Hope this helps!!! Let me know if you need anything else. Meredith 1 Page 1 of 2 Meredith Reckert From: Ralph Perri [perri@rmi.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 10:13 PM To: awhite@ci.wheatridge.co.us; mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us; mayor@ci.wheatridge.co.us; ryoung@ci.wheatridge.co.us; tcrane@ci.wheatridge.co.us; jhirt@ci.wheatridge.co.us; khberry26@hotmail.com; jerryditullio@comcast.net; egokey@comcast.net; sangjw@aol.com; klpa@comcast.net; bftireco@aol.com; councilorschulz@comcast.net Subject: RE: Neighborhood Meeting September 15, 2004 Alan White, Community Development Director Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-8001 RE: Request for Neighborhood Meeting - Applewood Baptist Church Proposed Expansion Dear Mr. White and Ms. Reckert, It has recently come to my attention that Applewood Baptist Church has filed an application for a special use permit to construct an additional three story education building with a footprint of 12,000 square feet on the north side of West 32nd Avenue. At the neighborhood meeting earlier this year the education building was originally proposed as a 28,000 square foot building. Have they now increased the size to a 36,000 square foot building? Not only have they increased the size of the proposed building, but I have also been informed that Applewood Baptist Church has changed the location of the building as well as the parking lots and the location of the detention pond from what they presented to the neighbors at the neighborhood meeting held several months ago. Now that they have changed their plan so significantly, why are they being given special and preferential treatment by not being required to start the process, as required by the City of Wheat Ridge, with another neighborhood meeting to outline and inform the neighbors of these important changes? This is an extremely important issue that, if approved, would have a tremendous negative impact on our neighborhood and completely change the residential structure and quality of life of the entire Applewood neighborhood. The neighbors should be kept informed on an issue of this importance and magnitude that could permanently change their lives. As an adjacent property owner, I am requesting that the City of Wheat Ridge not give Applewood Baptist Church special and preferential treatment and require them to schedule a neighborhood meeting to inform their neighbors of their change in plans. I would appreciate your prompt attention to this important matter. Thank you. Sincerely, Ralph Perri 9/17/2004 Page 2 of 2 303-202-2238 perri @ rmi.net CC: Gretchen Cervny, Randy Young, Travis Crane, Jeff Hirt, Karen A. Berry, Jerry DiTullio, Dean Gokey, Wanda Sang, Karen Adams, Mike Stites, Larry Schulz, Lena Rotola Ralph Perri perri@rmi.net Why Wait? Move to Earthl-ink. 9/17/2004 September 15, 20L Alan White, Community Development Director Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-8001 A RF.CENED RE: Neighborhood Meeting Regarding Applewood Baptist Church Proposed Expansion Dear Mr. White and Ms. Reckert: It has recently come to my attention that Applewood Baptist Church has filed an application for a special use permit to construct an additional three story education building with a footprint of 12,000 square feet on the north side of West 32"d Avenue. At the neighborhood meeting earlier this year the education building was originally proposed as a 28,000 square foot building. Have they now increased the size to a 36,000 square foot building? Not only have they increased the size of the proposed building, but I have also been informed that Applewood Baptist Church has changed the location of the building as well as the parking lots and the location of the detention pond from what they presented to the neighbors at the neighborhood meeting held several months ago. Now that they have changed their plan so significantly, why are they being given special and preferential treatment by not being required to start the process, as required by the City of Wheat Ridge, with another neighborhood meeting to outline and inform the neighbors of these important changes? This is an extremely important issue that, if approved, would have a tremendous negative impact on our neighborhood and completely change the residential structure and quality of life of the entire Applewood neighborhood. The neighbors should be kept informed on an issue of this importance and magnitude that could permanently change their lives. As an adjacent property owner, I am requesting that the City of Wheat Ridge not give Applewood Baptist Church special and preferential treatment and require them to schedule a neighborhood meeting to inform their neighbors of their change in plans. i would appreciate your prompt attention to this important matter. Thank you. Sincerely, Ralph Pern 303-202-2238 perri(a)rmi.net CC: Gretchen Cervny, Randy Young, Travis Crane, Jeff Hirt, Karen A. Berry, Jerry DiTullio, Dean Gokey, Wanda Sang, Karen Adams, Mike Stites, Larry Schulz, Lena Rotola City of Wheat Ridge pf W EqT Community Development Department ~O~pgppp Memorandum (4 TO: Roger Wadnal FROM: P51eredith Reckert SUBJECT: Revised traffic impact study DATE: September 1, 2004 Attached is supplemental information related to the Applewood Baptist Church's traffic study. The property address is 11225 W. 32°d Avenue (Case No. SUP-04-04). Please include this information with our original referral package dated August 26, 2004. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235-2848. MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS August 31, 2004 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Attn: Meredith Reckert 1%6r Re: Community Development Referral - SUP-04-04/Applewood Baptist Church located at 11225 West 32 d Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert, On behalf of the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District, Martin/Martin Inc. acting as the District Engineer, offers the following in response to the referenced Community Development Referral dated August 26, 2004: The existing building is currently provided with sanitary sewer service by the mainline within West 32nd Avenue along the south side of the property. If the new building is separate from the existing building, the new building will require a separate sanitary sewer service line to the existing sanitary sewer main within West 32nd Avenue. The sanitary sewer service requires a cleanout be constructed 5 feet outside of the new building and every 100 feet of service length. The sanitary sewer service will not require an easement. If the new building is in fact an addition to the existing building (expansion to the existing building), a separate sanitary sewer service is not required. The owner is responsible for construction and maintenance of the sanitary sewer service from building to main. A grease trap may be required if a kitchen/cafeteria is incorporated within the new building. The Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District must review and approve construction plans that involve food service. Appropriate development fees based on the final design are the responsibility of the Developer (Owner). Please call our office if there are any questions, Sincerely B11~S,~ District Engineer Cc: Special District Management Services - Kammy Tinney 4 2499 WEST COLFAX AVENUE . P.C. BOX 1 51500 LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80215 , 303.431 .6100 i _ I SOLI ATED mutual water I - i i August 30, 2004 to Ms. Meredith Reckert, Case Manager City of Wheat Ridge _ Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: City of Wheat Ridge Case Number SUP-04-04/Applewood Baptist Church for the l Expansion of the Church Addressed as 11225 West 32"d Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert: j I This will acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated August 26, 2004 regarding { the above referenced property. Our comments remain- the same as in prior correspondence. We have no additional comments or changes for the above referenced project. If you should have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact this office. j Sincerely, i Qu i Executive Vice President j i /cc cc: Walter S. Welton, CMWCo President Greg M. Stroeder, CMWCo Water Distribution Manager John M. Allen, CMWCo Project Engineer Neal A.,Santangelo, CMWCo Project Engineer i I - I THE CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 12700 West 27th Avenue • P.O. Box 150068 Lakewood, Colorado: 80215 - Telephone (303)238 0451.•. pax (303)237-5560 - - LANTZ ASSOCIATES 13335 W. 72 dCir. t nuda,C080005 (303)887-3714 (303) 423-4949 fax August 27, 2004 David F. Brossman Development Review Engineer City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29' Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Applewood Baptist Church Response to First Review Comments Traffic hnpact Study Dear Mr. Brossman: This is in response to your first review of the Traffic Impact Study for the Applewood Baptist Church located at 11225 W. 32nd Ave. I have included the Comments from Steve Nguyen for your use. 1. It appears that theproposed expansion is considered as an increase in the support facilities (or secondary use). The trgJ is increase related to the expansion needs to be projected accordingly As related to this proposed expansion, additional data and discussion are needed to support the 20% increase to church azeic as indicated in the study. As a suggestion, yearly membership counts can also be provided to assist in establishing the potential background growth The Church has provided average attendance numbers that show the attendance has grown from approximately 510 in 2000 to 910 estimated for 2004. The increase each year has varied from 6 to 33% with growth tapering off in the most recent years. This is an average increase of 100 people per year over the past 4 years. That relates to an average increase of 11 % per year over the 4 year period. Church School attendance has also increased, but at a slower rate. Church School attendance has increased 10% per year over the past 4 years. The 20% increase in traffic was derived from this projected increase. It was assumed that it would take approximately 2 years for the Education Building to be opened from the date of this original study. RECEIVED AUGS 4; 12004 Page 2 Response to Review 1 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study August 27, 2004 2. Since the proposed west access will function similar to an offset intersection with Robb Street. Please allow adequate distance to minimize left turn conflicts. A discussion is needed to address this configuration in terms of traffic operation and safety. The Church presently has three access points on the north side of 32nd Ave. The proposal is to close one of the access points to eliminate one access on 32nd Ave. The western access will allow adequate storage for left turning traffic in the existing two way left turn lane. As the site plan is finalized, the location of the driveway will be such that it will minimize the left turn conflict with the Robb St intersection. 3. Please provide a trip generation table to identify existing and new traffic generated by this expansion This will include anypeak hours ofthe adfacent streets or the generator. A trip generation table is included below based upon the traffic counts taken on 32"d Ave between the second and third services on Sunday morning. This period was determined to have the most impact on 32nd Ave as it has the most traffic leaving the site at the same time traffic is entering the site. This table also shows the trips projected with Education Building completed as well as future trips based on the Church's present growth rate. A drawing showing the counts along 32nd Ave is included in the enclosure. Church Trips Along 32nd Ave Existing With Ed Bldg Future (20 Year) In Out In Out In Out - 50 F 135 59 162 109 29T 4. LOS calculation needs to address both short and long-term traffic for all locations. 20 year horizon will be used as longterm traffic condition Additional LOS calculations were made for existing conditions, for near term conditions and for the future. The Trips are shown in the table above. Drawings showing the near term and long term are included in the enclosure. A summary of the LOS conditions is shown in the following table. Page 3 Response to Review 1 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study August 27, 2004 Level of Service Calculations One Hour Counts (August 2004) Near Term (With Education Building) Future Projections (20 years) Roadway/Driveway Movement Existing LOS (1 Hour Count) Near Tenn LOS (With Ed Bldg) Future LOS (20 Year Projection) Robb St A A A WB Left A A A NB Left & Right B B B North Side - Western A A A EB Left A A A SB Left & Right B B B North Side - Center A EB Left A SB Left & Right B North Side - Eastern A A A EB Left A A A SB Left & Center B B B South Side A A A WB Left A A A NB Left B B B NB Right A A A Quail St (South) A A A WB Left A A A NB Left & Right B B B Quail St (North) A A A EB Left A A A SB Left & Right B B B As the above table indicates, all of the movements at the intersections along 32nd Ave will operate at LOS B or better now and in the future. This indicates that 32nd Ave can easily accommodate the increased traffic from the Church. Page 4 Response to Review 1 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study August 27, 2004 S. Traffic counts and LOS analyses will need to be included for the intersection of Quail and Robb at 32' Avenue since they are part of the church traffic circulation and access. Traffic counts were taken at both intersections. The additional LOS analysis does include both intersections. 6 Trafftc count will need to be afull hour of the busiestperiod as needed for standard analysis. Additional traffic counts were taken for a one hour period as requested. 7. Please indicate other time ofthe week when thefacility has a significant use. Include traffcfigures if they are considered sign fcantfor analysis. The Church is open daily and has some functions during the week. None of the functions are significant when compared to the Sunday Services and thus were not included in the analysis. 8. Parking supply seems to be adequate for current use based on observations conducted by the Public Works Department However, additional parking will need to be identified and addressed to accommodate the proposed expansion to prevent overflow onto adjacent streets. Overflow parking on adjacent streets tends to have traffic impacts on the neighborhoods in various ways based on previous experiences. The Church has implemented several measures to address the impact of Church vehicles parked on adjacent streets. They have asked their members not to park on the street in front of neighbor's homes. This has decreased on street parking considerably. They have also started a shuttle service to bring in members by bus from an off site parking location. Page 5 Response to Review 1 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study August 27, 2004 The attached enclosures have details supporting the above answers. I trust that this answers your questions concerning the Traffic Impact Study for the Applewood Baptist Church Education Building expansion. The additional analysis provided in this letter does not change the recommendation in the original Traffic Impact Study. As this additional analysis shows 32"d Ave can easily accommodate the additional that could be generated by the addition of the Education Building on the north side of 32nd Ave. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me. Sin ly, Lantz, P.E. Cc: Duffy Deardorff, Applewood Baptist Church Enclosures: Traffic Volumes LOS Analysis City Comments Letter Applewood Baptist Church Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services U z z z T m l6 3 3 3 d 0 a m C7 g w z T ro N M O X350 s 5 7 <-284 ~ 0a 239 - 230 193 7 21 2 5 ~ 2 2 216 219' 19 0 8 19 rn M <h N W N ~ j co 3 n ` CJ p K a Cl) L J O August 2UU4 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Applewood Baptist Church Near Term Traffic (With New Ed Bldg) C0 0) z z T ~ 3 3 0 0 cc m d w z T MN 10 2~ 54 226 amiss - e-za $ 3 v - e 8 94 21 8 21 247 2 21 ~ o 19 N 4 N c r y CD d v t 0 O August LUU4 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Applewood Baptist Church Future Traffic (20 years) z z z z T ~ 3 3 0 Cl co w z 2 1~r 0) ao v 18 22 J X319 - 64 zs 2 4 2 19 3 z3 1 ~1 iz ~ 241 ao-~ 303 aa-> ' 4 1 ( z - ~ 20 - 0 21 ~ Cf) b 0 T N~ c CU 9 d v t 0 N August ,Luu4 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services nt Blockage turn flare (veh) 1329 518 802 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume-(veh/h) 217 2 ! 3 250 - 11 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 236 2 3 27212 i 7 Pedestrians Volume Total 238 3 272 12 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services +F- t \ nt Blockage turn flare (veh) in type None vC1, stage 1 conf vol 4.1 6.4 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue-free % 99 99 98, cM capacity (veh/h) 1301 519 777 Volume Total 8 235 263 18 Volume Left 8 0 0 3 Volume Right 0 0 3 15 Volume to 10.2 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 7' 21,6 239 3 3 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: 32nd Ave & Middle Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services nt Blockage turn flare (veh) m type None Median Vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Volume Total 0 238 255 27 Volume Left 0! 0 ` 0 14, Volume Riaht 0 0 5 13 0.00 0.14 0.15 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.9 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (Vah/h) 0 219 230 13 =i 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0. Volume Total 252 8 222 34 21 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES yC, conflicting volume 252 479 242 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Median 544 Volume Total Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services t r HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services Lane Configurations g I ? Y Sign Control Free S Free Stop ' Grade 0% 0% 0% Yoiume'(veh(h) 224 ` 19 29 183 17 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh)h) 243 ? 21 32 199 18 32 Pedestrians Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume Total 264 32 199 50 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services Lane Configurations } Til Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 ' 252 - 211 0 5 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Median storage veh) vC, confining volume 229 505 229 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vdl tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100'= 99 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1339 526 810 Volume Total 1 274 229 7 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Near Term Traffic (With New Ed Bldg) 0.92 0.92 0.92 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume Total 240 3 276 20 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS Near Term Traffic (With New Ed Bldg) t r Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 31 Volume (vehth) 8= 217 -226 10 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate tveti7h) 9 s 236 246 11 22 34 Pedestrians Volume Total 9 236 257 55 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Near Term Traffic (With New Ed Bldg) 1307 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 1 41- ~ h f* Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly f d*- rate (veh/h) 233 25 9 216 40 39 Pedestrians Volume Total 258 9 216 40 39 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Near Term Traffic (With New Ed Bldg) Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume {aaW 1 249 194 8 , , 17 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 9 18 . 14, Hourly tiov rate (veh7h) i 271 2,11 Pedestrians cM capacity (veh/h) 1350 538 825 Volume Total 1 271 220 33 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Near Term Traffic (With New Ed Bldg) Volume Total 289 32 201 50 cSH 0 0 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (vgh/h) 247,1 19 29 185 17 219, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Near Term Traffic (With New Ed Bldg) Lane Configurations Vi T T Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 275 213 1 5 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (ve i) -1 299 232 1 5 1 - Pedestrians Lane Width,- ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Ri ht t fl h g urn are (ve ) ype Median storage veh) v1C, conflicting volume stage ,33 Non -533: _ vC2, stage 2 cont vol' tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 CM capacity Volume Ri cS1-i Volume to 1 299 233 7 1 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 5' 1700 3700 540 7.7 0.0 0.0 11.7 A" B 0.0 0.0 11.7 B ition 25.7% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES --a. ~ k, 4/ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Future Traffic (20 years) turn cM capacity (veh/h) 264 4 347 33 777 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh1h) 239 4 4 31',9 20 10, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS Future Traffic (20 years) Pedestrians Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (yeh/h) 37 212 264 18 49 - 84, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Volume Total 40 230 307 145 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Future Traffic (20 years) vC2, stage2 conf vol 9 242 45 43 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 241 20 8 223 41 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate-(vet/h) 262: 22 9-,1:242 45 43,11 Pedestrians HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Future Traffic (20 years) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly, flow rate (veh/h) 1 304 1 216 24 48 26 Pedestrians Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 304 240 74 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Future Traffic (20 years) tG, tF PO cm Intersection Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 303 2132 202 19 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Future Traffic (20 years) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.1% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES ~ -.10. ~ t \11 d Volume Total 1 363 253 9 Volume Left 14 0 0 7 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-286' Cry of Wheat Edge ~ Department of Public Works 7500 WEST 29' AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-285' June 14, 2004 Mr. Fred Lantz Lantz Associates 13335 W. 72nd Circle Arvada, CO 80005 Re: - First review comments for the Traffic Impact Study for the Applewood Baptist Church Subdivision located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. Dear Mr. Lantz, The City of Wheat Ridge Engineering Division Manager, Mr. Steven Nguyen, P.E. has completed the initial review of the Traffic Impact Study received on April 19, 2004 for the proposed development, and has the following comments: Traffic Impact Study Please see attached sheet. The above comments are as of the date reviewed and may not reflect all comments from other departments or reviewing agencies. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cc: Stele Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner File Applewood aaptiSt SUh 1161 tUdY- MviLW11FAM aI ~y X43 i~ 1 8 `epWheat ~d~ Department of Public Works Department MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer FROM: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager DATE: Friday, June 11, 2004 SUBJECT: Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32"a Avenue, Traffic Impact Review #1 I have reviewed the traffic impact study for the above project dated February 2004 and have the following comments It appears that the proposed expansion is considered as an increase in the support facilities (or secondary use). The traffic increase related to the expansion needs to be projected accordingly. As related to this proposed expansion, additional data and discussion are needed to support the 20% increase to church traffic as indicated in the study. As a suggestion, yearly membership counts can also be provided to assist in establishing the potential background growth. 2. Since the proposed west access will function similar to an offset intersection with Robb Street. Please allow adequate distance to minimize left turn conflicts. A discussion is needed to address this configuration in terms of traffic operation and safety. 3. Please provide a trip generation table to identified existing and new traffic generated by this expansion. This will include any peak hours of the adjacent streets or the generator. 4. LOS calculation needs to address both short and long-term traffic for all locations. 20-year horizon will be used as long-term traffic condition. 5. Traffic counts and LOS analyses will need to be included for the intersection of Quail and Robb at 32` d Avenue since they are part of church traffic circulation and access. 6. Traffic count will need to be a full hour of the busiest period as needed for standard analysis. 7. Please indicate other time of the week when the facility has a significant use. Include traffic figures if they considered significant for analysis. 8. Parking supply seems to be adequate for current use based on observations conducted by the Public Works Department. However, additional parking will need to be identified and addressed to accommodate the proposed expansion to prevent overflow onto adjacent streets. Overflow parking on adjacent streets tends to have traffic impacts on the neighborhoods in various ways based on previous experiences. cc: Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works Meredith Reckert From: Pete Klammer [pklammer@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 2:52 PM To: 'Meredith Reckert' Subject: RE: ABC FILED! Switcheroo layout. May I repeat this verbatim to my e-mail list? Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@ACM.org "Either Be Good, or Else Be Careful, but Do Have Fun! " -----Original Message----- From: Meredith Reckert [mailto:mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 1:24 PM To: pklammer@acm.org Subject: RE: ABC FILED ! Switcheroo layout. Hi, Pete- I have not seen a copy of the newsletter yet, so can't comment on that. It would appear that there was some erroneous information given out as they are not applying for a building permit, just the special use permit which must be approved before a building permit could be issued. The church submitted an application on Friday. It was not complete as they had not submitted enough copies of certain documents (drainage report, traffic study). The rest of the documents were brought in late Monday afternoon. Today we prepared and sent out the referrals to other city departments and outside agencies (including the City of Lakewood). The referral period ends on September 17 which is a little longer than we normally give. I would suspect that there will be modifications required on some of the technical documents. The ten-day notice to the neighborhood will not start until staff is satisfied that all requirements are being met. If anyone is interested in looking at the file, they are welcome to go through it here in the Community Development department at city hall (second floor). Copies made are .50 apiece. It may be smart to give our administrative assistant a "heads up" before coming. Please contact Kathy at 303-235-2846. If you have any other questions, please let me known (303-235-2848). Meredith -----Original Message----- From: Pete Klammer [mailto:pklammer@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 12:02 PM To: Applewood Familes for Residential Values Subject: ABC FILED ! Switcheroo layout. I thought I would hear about it from someone else before seeing it in ABC's mail publication, but here it is, in today's "@applewood": Application for Building Permit Filed August 20, 2004 "On Friday, August 20, the curch filed an application with the City of Wheat Ridge to obtain a building permit for the purpose of adding one education building to our north property. All the required documents are available to the public at the city offices. We will have some information and documents on our website also as soon as possible. _ 1 "You will notice that the plan has changed in response to input from our community. "You will be hearing more as the process continues. Two drawings are shown, one the layout presented to the Neightborhood Input Meeting last April on Caucus Night, and the other a new layout, which is different from what was shown to the public. Bait and switch? You decide. Pete Klammer / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@ACM.org Idealism may not win every contest, but that's not what I choose it for! 2 Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Referral Form Date: August 26, 2004 Response Due: September 17, 2003 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a special use permit with a site plan to allow expansion of a church in an R-1 zone district at the property located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. Case No.: SUP-04-04/Applewood Baptist Church Request: Approval of a special use permit with a site plan for expansion of a church in an R-1 zone district. The property is approximately 14.67 acres in size. The specific request is to allow for construction of a three-story education building with a footprint of 12,000 square feet. The extent of construction includes expansion of existing parking areas and relocation of an existing detention pond. Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. If you further larifs , ion~Gon~tact t a m ~n~ger. 4051 Go lora. 100 1Eu,! ,a~ Go.,sYriycyrleaf e~~ i~~s7 -'eg 1gG OW Case Manager: Meredith Reckert Voice: 303.235.2848 Fax: 303.235.2857 Email: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us DISTRIBUTION: Water District (Consolidated Mutual) Sanitation District (Northwest Lakewood) Fire District (Wheat Ridge) Adjacent City (Lakewood) Jefferson County Planning Department Xcel Energy Owest Communications Colorado Department of Transportation Denver Regional Council of Governments Jeff Co Health Department JeffCo Schools JeffCo Commissioners AT&T Broadband Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Regional Transportation District Wheat Ridge Post Office Wheat Ridge Police Department Wheat Ridge Public Works Wheat Ridge Parks & Recreation Department Wheat Ridge Forestry Division at Ridge Building Division Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority "The Canwtion City" Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Referral Form I Date: August 26, 2004 Response Due: September 17, 2003 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a special use permit with a site plan to allow expansion of a church in an R-1 zone district at the property located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. Case No.: SUP-04-04/Applewood Baptist Church Request: Approval of a special use permit with a site plan for expansion of a church in an R-1 zone district. The property is approximately 14.67 acres in size. The specific request is to allow for construction of a three-story education building with a footprint of 12,000 square feet. The extent of construction includes expansion of existing parking areas and relocation of an existing detention pond. Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. If you need further clarification, contact the case manager. Case Manager: Meredith Reckert Voice: 303.235.2848 Fax: 303.235.2857 Email: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us Water District (Consolidated Mutual) Sanitation District (Northwest Lakewood) Fire District (Wheat Ridge) Adjacent City (Lakewood) Jefferson County Planning Department Xcel Energy Qwest Communications Colorado Department of Transportation Denver Regional Council of Governments JeffCo Health Department JeffCo Schools Jeff Co Commissioners AT&T Broadband Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Regional Transportation District Wheat Ridge Post Office Wheat Ridge Police Department Wheat Ridge Public Works Wheat Ridge Parks & Recreation Department Wheat Ridge Forestry Division Wheat Ridge Building Division Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority "The Carnation City" 8 0 T ~ a ~M 7 H 7 1 6H 0 R1 5 F R-1 A :P. -I_ Rn VF 33RC 1 'u, -A o LAKEWOOD A 0 200 400 Feet -~w";Ir~ !ar Floodplain (approximate location) R-1 VE PROPERTY LOCATION U) op-, 5 ~09 0 ■ ■ L . 0 TOPO RAPHIC SURVEY OF TRACT 22 AND THE W-1/2 OF TRACT 21, BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN T E NW-1/4 OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PORTION OF TRACT 12 3 a BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION LOT I LOT 2 I LOT 3 _ U A. = swam wv ps') - 544.0 7 INV Cr) WT = SI08.7 n FIND 5/8" DEBAR 55 }-W/ALUM. CAP LANE ENGR. LS 438 INV NOT = le z I ns v i In~ u_. _C" A , PORTION F WACi It BROORSIOE pDMSION ZONED S -1 IN, OUT ~.AN, HV IN 14,11, TRACT B BANZHAF SUBDIVISION ZONED R-1 16' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 8K. 1616. PG. 158 PORTION OF TRACT 10 / BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION/ ZONED R-1 sn I p LEGEND ...1, \ -8 yp_y__- - sp_y_ ___soT__-4•~m__ V L.~,!~:~ 1 - - - - 1-• - - - - Y - - - _ - - - - - =-r - SG x-rx \ 1 1 Sg0'34 33 [ 5 I I / \ m > ♦ ` ~ --/---L _r \ I \ \ \ `sroRL4u o, , t / I aa'-cMa - Ida WOCD FENCE O -x-x-x-x-x-x- WIRE FENCE -w- - - WATER ONE - ss - ss - SANITARY SEWER LINE -----m-----6o---- STORM DRAIN UNE GAS MINE d ax OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNE p UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNE GUY WIRE 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT REC. NO. 841197241 ZONED R-1 TRACT 22 AND ME WEST 1/2 OF TRACT 21, BROOKSIDE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. TOGETHER WIN THAT PORTION OF WEST 32ND AVENUE ADJOINING SUBJECT PROPERTY AS VACATED BY ORDINANCE NO. 940. SERIES OF 1993 AND FOUND SECTION CORNER (AS BROWN) RECORDED OCTOBER 1, 1993 UNDER RECEPTOR NO. 93155172 IN ME COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, CONTAINING 539,000 SQUARE FEET OR 14.67 ACRES FOUND MONUMENT (AS SHOWN) MORE OR LESS. SET MONUMENT (AS SHOWN) SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE I, DOUGLAS R. BERUNG. A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED IN ME STATE OF COLORADO, HEREBY CENIFlES MAT A SURVEY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY STORM DRAIN MANHOLE WAS CONDUCTED DIRECTLY UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN OCTOBER 2001 AND REVISED IN AUGUST 2004, IN ACCORDANCE WN ME CURRENT LA OF ME STATE OF COLORADO UM.TY POLE GOVERNING LAND SURVEYS AND PLATS. OORE9/f LIGHT POLE • GAS METER e,y TN„~y , WATER VALVE DOUGLAS R. BERUNG DALE 0'L'~p H 12 ZOOQ- WATER MANHOLE PLS 34594 9 , WATER METER MOUNTAIN STATES ENGINEERING Confiuttanro M G9A Engtleering & Lam surwByirv MOUNTAIN 6TdTE3 ENGINEERING ♦<9pQldTE9 P G . . . REV. AUG. 12, 2004 ORE 12e60 w aea m smee m2 OIS6ropp.tlwg CM 0°a ca Maw iozze as -♦aao NOV. M. 2001 1 CME/URB 1p1':1 \1 1 1\ \I \I L All SHEET 1 OF 1 A PP LE IN 001] KNOLLS 12TH FILING ZONED R-I LOT 4 I LOT 5 - LOT 6 18" CMP TELEPHONE BOX 10 PSCO UTILITY .A_- L 1 EASEMENT / REC. NO. 84112500 1 `~y}- G NOO. 3O"567 ~1 OS 49 wv -.x~- _Saz1~...,~3 \ 1 \ -"'ApY✓l L~ I I 1/ Imo'/ y 1 p AE 1Wi. IX 51`6]2sz xv our I ~ \ \ 1 \ \ - 5 / I I I ! s' rnu 6'x5' a','!'\• \ \ N \ \ ` \ \ ~ /9435 , 1 I I I I FENCEIPOST I I~ rT ~ ~ e , \ \ 1\`\ - 1 ~Ir~1~ 7 h a'I\SANITA, st' re I \ saRX\ _ / I I I I w-1/ 1 \ \ 1 111 I I I ~i \ EA\SgMENi IN Y ( -1 i \ ! ! TRACTi \ \ \ g 14,1 '~'J/ g I ~i~~ \ ON. 939, PG. 4O8 - 1 ( \ o- ` (IRRIGATION AND/OR/ 1 1\ \ 'F'1 =1\11111 /;n \ Pn G\ C ✓,vC \r. l~ a 1~, p ` \ l ) \ \ DRAINAG DITCH ! L 11 \ \ \ 24" STORM NO EA9 MENT OF ¢EC )RD ( \ \ J \1\111 1 i\ 1\ 1\ L THE JI \~II~1p1 \1 \ \ \ E,~~ I 1 ( \ \ \ \ \ \ 111\\ \ II/ n! 1// ~I111\J. I / s 1 \ \ "S \ \ \ \ i III\( 1 _111 64x1.02 11 ' IXV X L 5413AZ \ \ \ 1 I Ic~41\i ~I',, ..6D .54].22 / / 1 \ \ ~ \ \ \ 1 I T\\`_ , ~ \aa k. 1 I ( \ \ \ \ \ \ L \ \ l \ \ ¢ z0NE %A \ \ TRkCT 22 \ \ \ \ I 1 / / \ \ Y I s'jj NWT\\\ I / ZONN~\ \ \ `j \ \ \ \ 1 ~ //1 ~ \ I t NS ~1 / ae \ IIIM\\ \11 y \ V / LgNA GuLGl4 I '~D YEAR FLOOD ZONE I • c \ \ 1\ />T/ (EE PLAT HOTS 2.J ,A \ 4 \ \ \ \ I 1 / / 1 \ \ 1 1 ! 11\: + \ , _ I - _y__~_Ifj mill 1 LF~-\\T -\I ~ 1 ' / I rv t II \ 1 I I ` 111 I I I I~ , ` ! V I I I _ / / T~ ' / ~ \ \ I I I 1 1 11 11 I I 1 1 1 I I C'T : ~ / 1 1 \ \ \ , ` I \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ I i 1 I , I 1 i~ I I I I , n \k PDND~R xv lx 54301 ♦ I\ \ 1 1 ` I \ I III DETEN ON \ II \ \ 1 1 W-/2 \ \ V I I I EA / ! I I.) If`/ 16R SPRTA Y1iS ER 1 1 1 1 TRAP, 22 I iTl~!TL{ & I I ! I III ` y EASEMENr3 ` I I I 1 \ I 1 1 III 11 I ( I I I 'F' I Y I BKI. 9fi4. PC. 500 \ 1 1 ` I , \ III 1 \I / ! I I i i \ I 1 1 1 ~ ~ li\Ij11"======1%/J/I~ Ali ~ \ /P \ / 1 I g, I-i y O I P P4xpnc T / / . k 2,0,' III z f7 _ ya / ~ I1~1 1h 5 I 1 7 / i ~ \ \ \ \\I\ ` , ~d1111 " \ \li 011i IL _ II'',dol _ vill'I PIM = 5122 75 I \ -Inv w = ,NI.ss I \ \ l INV OUT ='U"' END 5/8' REBAR INV\ 94\~ -W/PLASTC CAP INV= 5434.31 48" RCP PORTION OF TRACT 23 INV OUT= 5443.45 NOTES BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION ZONED R-1 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS. THE SOON UNE OF THE NW-1/4 OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST. 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEARS S8919'55"W AS MONUMENIED AND SHOWN HEREON, AND AS SHOWN ON ME CITY RIGHT OF WAY & REFERENCE MONUMENTS MAP. 2. ROOD ZONE UNITS ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO AND INCORPORATED AREAS. MAP NUMBER OSD59C0215-E AND MAP NUMBER OBOSCOH)A-E ROW DATED JUNE 17, 2003. ME PROPERTY NORTH OF MIS UNE IS IN ZONE-AE OF ME 100 YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA, AND HAVING BASE ROOD ELEVATONS. ME REMAINDER OF ME SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES IN ZONE-% WHICH IS OUTSIDE OF ME 100-YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA. 3. BENCHMARK ELEVATION WAS PROVIDED BY ME CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AS FOLLOWS: ME W-1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 28 SHOWN HEREON, HAS AN ELEVATION OF 5451.66 4. UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON OBSERVABLE SURFACE EVIDENCE TOGETHER MYTH AS-BUILT OR UTILITY PLANS FROM ME APPROPRIATE AGENCY AND UNDERGROUND ITEMS ARE SHOWN IN ME APPROXIMATE POSITIONS. ALL URUTES MUST BE REM LOCATED PRIOR TO MY CPNSTRUCTON. 5. MIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TIME SEARCH BY MOUNTAIN STATES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES P.C. TO DETERMINE OWNER99P OF THIS PARCEL. RIGHTS OF WAY, EASEMENTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD WERE BASED UPON A MLE POLICY BY LAND TIE GUARANTEE COMPANY UNDER ORDER NO, ABBBO603 DATED SEE. 20, 2001 AT 5:00 P.M. 6. NOTICE. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AMR YOU FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN MIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE MAN TEN YEARS FIRM ME DAZE OF ME CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 7. AN EASEMENT FOR A 4' FIRE LINE CONNECTON IS OESORISED AT REC. NO. 0057376. THIS DESORIPTON DOES NOT IDENTIFY A SPECIFIC WIDTH OR LOCATION OF MIS EASEMENT, ~I END 5/8" DEBAR W/UM. CAP N00'30'S6"W 1~ 2 LD' - I Ir- _ 2n11 h! IL ,I v L C~ I . a ° W ININTInc , L _ Il~m I I I•i 3o cCMNC EA 10' PSOO G$UA-'- - _ NO LOREC. NO. 86 12' dPpN~Nd~AL4j1 V I YI § OF R.O.W. VACATED NO. 93155172 EASEMENT RESERVED. RECEIVED ALIG 2 'L, 4-, I _ _ Nodedsc'w__soe.4s' _ _ 4 OSO i I I I l I I ~ II I I I I II I I~ I l 1 T -a- ac u T1 James E. Moorhead qrr Architects - Planners 9731 Cypren Point Circle Phone lwr Ile, CO 124 (303) 790-8085 N s _ +r M ~ U 1 ~I Ell 1111111 'I L t 2 p 2w~ C1 of Job No.0401' Of I 1 IlrP immm /T1 - ■ SLUCWroI irKar ENC4k.l E Ir..r James E. Moorhead Architects - Planners 9731 Cypress Point Circle Phone L.-r. CO 80124 (303) 790-8065 NF-W Eouc nm bUI DING Dowb'•P-04 Sheet No APPLEWOOD PJAPTI5T'CHURCH Own~Qha 11200 WEST 32No AvENUE chka: of WHEAT RIO@E,COLO;ZADO 50033 NPA401 of Applewood Baptist Church Education Building Addition Traffic Impact Study Prepared for: Applewood Baptist Church 11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033 303-232-9575 303-238-2513 fax Prepared by: Fred Lantz LANTZ ASSOCIATES 13335 W 72nd Cir Arvada, CO 80005 303-887-3714 303-423-4949 fax c. 23410 L/23101' February 2004 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Figure 1 - Vicinity Map 4 Existing Conditions 5 Figure 2 - Existing Traffic Volumes 8 Education Building Addition 9 Figure 3 -Traffic Volumes with Addition 10 LOS Calculations 11 LOS Definitions 12 Pedestrians 13 Summary and Conclusion 14 Appendix 15 February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 2 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study Introduction Applewood Baptist Church is located on W 32"d Ave between Quail St and Robb St. The sanctuary is located on the south side of W 32"d Ave with an education building located on the north side of W 32"d Ave. Parking is provided on both the north side and the south side of W 32nd Ave. A crosswalk in W 32"d Ave is used by pedestrians to cross between the buildings. Church services are held on Sunday mornings. There are three services, 8:00 am, 9:30 am and 11:00 am. Sunday school is at 9:30 am and 11:00 am. The church is planning to expand the education facilities by constructing an addition to the Education Building on the north side of W 32nd Ave. This Traffic Impact Study will look at the existing conditions on Sunday morning and the traffic impacts of the construction of the education building. While the Church is used other times during the week, the traffic on Sunday mornings is the heaviest. Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the Church. February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 3 Vicinity Map ~ N W 44th Av 3 - 43rd , C O ° m m E 58 42nd AV yy.:. 70 41st AV j a r m' m W 3M PI z W 38th AV = W 38th AV E c Vdg6~` ZrnniaC ti N- r. ~ : 5 m: a; ,r: _y r y 1 x. a o x a 3 I I , W135th AV t f n..... e P r c0 r ° o. . d e 3 ~33t f S ~ ~ ~ t a .~.7 W 32nd Av W 32r~p AV ~ i W31 st PI i ' e a 5 a"" i 4 S mk W28 th ? W 27th Av ° -y g TM ~ U N r~ IN 26th PI .y- 26thAv W281h AV g E N 24th PI W 25th AV = &0 IN ffi 5s 1(JZ3 d A ~ .rte . ,ae5 r ,_t.~ r V e N ,,..s - N m g ~ ,t. d• W y W~22ntl PI ~ -I 21 st AV N o a ' e W 20th AV n 3 ~ 5 N ~ N' e N~ 3 9 N: e c ~ E ~ dLL ~ m ~CAMFRiH f9~1N]ETRKII~C ~a~ ,nv ..n ~.v p i._....- ©1998 by Rand McNally & Company. All rights reserved. Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study Existing Conditions W 32°d Ave at the church is a two lane roadway with a two-way left turn lane in the center and bike lanes on each side. There are sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. I The church presently has 4 access points onto W 32nd Ave. Three driveways are on the north side and one on the south side. There are two separate lots on the north side with one access serving the western lot and two accesses serving the eastern lot. The education building is on the eastern lot. February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 5 W 32nd Ave Street Section Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Central and Western Access Points on North Side Eastern Access on North Side Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study Traffic Counts were taken on Sunday morning to determine the amount of traffic using the driveways. Counts were taken at the end of the 9:30 am service when vehicles were leaving the Church at the same time that vehicles were arriving for the 11:00 am service. Counts were also taken at the end of the 11:00 am service. The church traffic lasted 30 minutes, thus the counts were 30 minute counts. The traffic counts indicated that the heaviest period was the time between 9:30 am and the 11:00 am services. These traffic volumes were expanded to an hourly period in order to calculate a Level of Service at the 4 access points. Figure 2 summarizes the traffic counts at the driveways. February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 7 Access on South Side & Crosswalk on W 32nd Ave Figure 2 Applewood Baptist Church Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services z Z 0) Z Z m m 3 m 0 o O d o a w 00N ov ~ g 7 ~77 $2 32nd Ave 1 3 9 i 10 100 5 102 ` m m n ~ o ~ v s 0 February 2004 LANI'Z ASSOCIATES Page 8 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study Education Building Addition The Church is planning to construct an addition to the Education Building on the north side of W 32nd Ave. This addition is to be approximately 11,000 sf and will serve as additional space for the Education Building. This addition will improve the access and circulation to the property on the north side of W 32nd Ave. and will allow the elimination of one of the existing access points. The easternmost access point will remain, the center and western access points closed and new access point constructed on the west side of the property. Since the addition is to increase the education space, it will serve the existing congregation and will not in itself generate additional traffic. The improvement in facilities, however, could help to increase the congregation slightly. To evaluate the traffic that will be generated by the new addition, the traffic using the parking lots during the peak period will be increased by 20%. The traffic will also be redistributed to the new driveway configuration to determine if the Level of Service (LOS) decreases with the additional traffic. Figure 3 shows the future traffic including the addition. The church traffic was increased by 20% and the street traffic was increased by 2% to account for traffic growth until the construction is completed. February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 9 Figure 3 Applervood Baptist Church Future Traffic - Between Middle Services U z z T T co m 3 3 m m m N Co ~ w N° 11 Nr s 0 ~~e 18 g4 32nd Ave 92 4 1oa~ ,0 ~ 22 N Z l6 ~ N > n d a D or m a t 0 0 February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 10 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study LOS Calculations Level of Service (LOS) conditions were calculated for each access to determine if the increase in traffic due to the Education Bldg addition would cause traffic congestion in the area. The following table shows the existing LOS and the LOS with the construction of the education building addition. Driveway/Movement Existing LOS LOS with Addition North Side - Western A A EB Left A A SB Left & Right A B North Side - Center A EB Left A SB Left & Right A - North Side - Eastern A A EB Left A A SB Left & Center B B South Side A A WB Left A A NB Left B B NB Right A A February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 11 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study LOS Definitions The Level of Service (LOS) of an intersection is determined by the delay vehicles experience at the intersection. At a stop sign controlled intersection, the LOS is only calculated for the directions that must stop or yield to other traffic. A LOS is not calculated for the through traffic because it does not have to stop or yield. Intersections are designed to operate at LOS C or better and are allowed to operate at D or better during the AM and PM peak hour periods. The following table shows the seconds of delay that determine the LOS at stop sign controller intersections. LOS Criteria for Stop sign controlled intersections LOS Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A <5 B >5 and <10 C >10 and <20 D >20 and <30 E >30 and <45 F >45 As the LOS calculations indicate, there is little or no delay to vehicles entering and exiting the driveways for the Church. This was also confirmed by observations during these hours. The LOS does not change with the increase in traffic due to the Education Building addition. Therefore, the traffic generated by the addition will not cause an impact on the street network. February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 12 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study Pedestrians With the education building and some of the parking on the north side of the roadway, there is considerable pedestrian traffic crossing W 32"d Ave. Observations before and after the 11:00 am service indicated approximately 125 pedestrians crossing W 32nd Ave during each time period. A crossing guard is provided before and after the services to assist the pedestrians. The guard places traffic cones in the bike lane and also in the left turn lane to add emphasis to the crosswalk. In addition, the guard has a Stop Paddle to stop traffic. This method is very efficient for both the pedestrian and the vehicles on W 32nd Ave. No congestion was observed for the pedestrians or the vehicles. February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 13 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study Summary and Conclusion The traffic generated by the Education Building Addition proposed by the Applewood Baptist Church can easily be accommodated by the existing street system. The development will eliminate one access on the north side of W 32"d Ave. Traffic circulation will also be improved in the area north of W 32"d Ave. Pedestrian traffic will continue to cross W 32"d Ave before and after services. The present crossing guard program is very efficient in assisting pedestrians and should be continued. The crossing guard is able to look for gaps in traffic and thus does not delay traffic on W 32"d Ave or cause any traffic congestion. No congestion was observed in the areas surrounding the church and none is expected in the in the future. The additional parking that is being constructed on the north side of W 32"d Ave will be sufficient to accommodate church traffic. Vehicles can be parked on-site and will not be forced into the surrounding neighborhood. February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 14 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study Appendix LOS Calculations February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services Lane Configurations R Sign Control Free :Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (vehlh) 2 203 183 2 4 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vehlh) 2 221 199 2 4% 17 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft1s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 201 425 200 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 99` 98 cM capacity (vehlh) 1371 585 841 Volume Total 2 221 201 22 Volume Left 2 0 0 4 Volume Right 0 0 2 17 cSH 13,71 1700 1700 773 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.13 0.12 0.03 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 2 Control belay (s) 7.6 0.0 0.0 9.8 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 9.8 Approach LOS A Applewood Baptist Church February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: 32nd Ave & Middle Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services Lane Configurations I ? T+ Y Sign Control Free Free Stop. Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 6 202 169 16 12` 28 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 7 220 ` 184 17 13; 30 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent` Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 201 425 192 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 33 p0 queue free % < 100 98 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 1371 583 849 Volume Total 7 220 201 43 Volume Left 7 0 , 0 13 Volume Right 0 0 17 30 cSH 1371 1700 1700 747 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.13 0.12 0.06 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 5 Control Delay (s) 7.6 0.0 0.0 10.1 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 10.1 Approach LOS B Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.6% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services 4N f* Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 193 30 30 159 36 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 210 33 33 173 39 24 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 242 464 226 ` vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 93` 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1324 543 813 Volume Total 242 33 173 39 24 Volume Left 0 33 0 39 0 Volume Right 33 0 0 0 24 cSH 1700 1324 1700 543 813 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.02 0.10 0.07 0.03 Queue Length (ft) ' 0 2 0 6 2' Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.8 0.0 12.1 9.6 Lane LOS A B A` Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.2 11.2 Approach LOS B Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.0% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services Lane Configurations R T T3~ 't" Sign Control Free iFree Stop: Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 2 204 " 164 10 14 , 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 2 222 178 11 15 22 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f 1s) Percent' Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None` Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 189 410; 184 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 97 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1385 597 859 Volume Total 2 222 189 37 Volume Left 2 0 0 15 Volume Right 0 0 11 22 cSH 1385 1700 1700 727 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.13 0-11 0.05 Queue.Length (ft) 0 0 0 4 Control Delay (s) 7.6 0.0 0.0 10.2 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 10.2 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.7% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS Future Traffic - Between Middle Services k, 4/ Lane Configurations I T T+ Tf Sign Control Free Free Stop` Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 10 208 180 22 20 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 11 226 196 24 22 57 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft(s) Percent` Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 220 455` 208 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 99 96 93 cM capacity (veh/h) 1350 558 833 Volume Total 11 226 220 78 Volume Left 11 0 0 22 Volume Right 0 0 24 57 cSH 1350 1700 1700 733 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.11 Queue Length (ft) 1 0 0 9 Control Delay (s) 7.7 0.0 0.0 10.5 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.4 0.0 10.5 Approach LOS B of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Future Traffic - Between Middle Services Lane Configurations I T T Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 2 208 168 12 34 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 2 226 183 13 37 26 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 196 420 189 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 94 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1377 589 853 Volume Total 2 226 196 63 Volume Left 2 0 ` 0 37 Volume Right 0 0 13 26 cSH 1377 1700 1700 676 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.13 0.12 0.09 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 8 Control Delay (s) 7.6 0.0 0.0 10.9 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 10.9 Approach LOS B Average' Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Uti lization 22.2% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Future Traffic - Between Middle Services Lane Configurations jr ♦ R Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade b% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 184 44 . 36 156 46 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 200 48 39 170 50 28 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 248 472 224 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 IC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 91 97 cM capacity (veh/h) UMM 1318 : ; ligm 534 110: 816 Volume Total m 248 IRI 39 1 170 p 50 28 Volume Left 0 39 0 50 0 Volume Right 48 0 0 0 28 cSH 1700 1318 1700 534 816 Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.03 0.10 0.09 0.03 Queue Length (ft) 0 2 0 8 3 Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.8 0.0 12.4 9.6 Lane LOS A B A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.5 11.4 Approach LOS B Average Delay 2.2 Intersection Capacity Uti lization 23.46/. ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 08/24/04 15:29 FAX 3037962777 BUNS FIGA & WILL Z002 Figa& August 23, 2004 MICHAEL 1 NORTON W IRC, mjnorton@btw-law.com The Honorable Gretchen Cerveny Mayor City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: pplication ofAnplewooI Bast Church Our File No. 2269.00 Dear Madam Mayor: As you may know, I represent Applewood Baptist Church in connection with its application to the City of Wheat Ridge i'or permission to develop a new educational building to join the existing facility on the north side of West 32°d Avenue in Wheat Ridge. The application submitted by Applewood Baptist Church will speak for itself. In addition, Senior Pastor Calvin Wittman, Executive Pastor Duffy Deardorff, members of Applewood Baptist Church's design team, and many others, including myself, look forward to the opportunity to discuss this plan with you and the members of the Wheat Ridge City Council. As that opportunity approaches, I wanted to outline for you and the members of the Wheat Ridge City Council some of the extraordinary steps Applewood Baptist Church has taken over the last several months to work with representatives of the City of Wheat Ridge, including Meredith Reckert, to develop a proposal that complements Applewood Baptist Church's existing facilities, that meets Applewood Baptist Church's current and pressing future needs, and that accommodates the concerns of the imrnediate neighbors, mostly residents of Quail Street to the east of the proposed addition. Representatives of Applewood Baptist Church initially approached the City of Wheat Ridge to discuss construction of a new education building in March 2003. Thereafter, representatives of Applewood Baptist Church and a design team made up of Jim Moorhead of James E. Moorhead Architects-Planners, Gary Theander of Mountain States Engineering, Jason Hand of Staller & Henry, Inc., Loren Priest of Priest Engineering, and Fred Lantz of Lantz Associates, began to meet to develop a comprehensive plan which would result in a new education building to be added to the existing building which was built in 1984 and which no longer accommodates Applewood Baptist Church's current membership. BNRNs FIGA & WII L P.C. ATiORNCYS AT LAw 6400 S. Rddler's Gresn Circle, Sule 1030 • Enylcwood, CO 801 l 1 - P: 303 796 2626 • R!103 796 2777 • www.bfwdamcom 08/24/04 15:29 FAX 9037982777 BURNS FIGA & WILL 003 Burns, Figa & Will, P.C. August 23, 2004 Page 2 of 5 This team developed a building plan for a 12,000 square foot "footprint" building, the alignment of which was generally south to north and attached to the existing building. Thereafter, on November 18, 2003, having been advised by representatives of the City of Wheat Ridge that it was appropriate to hold a general meeting of neighbors, held such a neighbors' meeting at the Church. As the files of the City of Wheat Ridge will reflect, the design plan generally described above, i.e., design of a 12,000 square foot "footprint" building, the alignment of which was generally south to north and attached to the existing building, was presented at this meeting. Quite honestly, while there was support for this proposal, there was also a fair amount of concern expressed by nearby neighbors, particularly to the disruption to the westerly views that some thought would result from the south to north alignment of the proposed building. Nevertheless, on March 11, 2004, Pastor Wittman, Pastor Deardorff, other representatives of Applewood Baptist Church and 1 met with representatives of the City of Wheat Ridge to determine the next step;3 in the application process. At this meeting, we were advised that certain procedures relating to the Special Use Permit process which applied to any application which may be submitted by Applewood Baptist Church in connection with the proposed educational building had been changed. Applewood Baptist Church was informed at this meeting that, while it was not essential for Applewood Baptist Church to do so, it would be best if Applewood Baptist Church would schedule yet another neighborhood meeting so as to comply with these new procedures, On April 13, 2004, Applewood 13aptist Church announced and held its second neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed building plan for a 12,000 square foot "footprint" building, the alignment of which was generally south to north and attached to the existing building. Basically, the same presentation as had been made to neighbors at the November 18, 2003, neighbors' meeting, was again presented. As before, while there was support for this proposal, there was also a fair amount of concern expressed by nearby neighbors, particularly those residing on Quail Street to the east of the proposed project As a result of the concerns by these neighbors, Pastor Wittman asked me to invite a smaller "working group" of neighbors trade up of individuals who had spoken up at the April 13, 2004, neighborhood meeting, but had taken different positions on aspects of the proposed project and were thus representative ofihe larger group of neighbors who bad attended the April 13, 2004, neighborhood meeting, to continue the dialogue and to determine if there were ways Applewood Baptist Church could accommodate the mutual interests in such areas or concerns as facility design and configuration, wildlife protection, and drainage impact. As a result and at Pastor Wittman's direction, I invited Cindy Klammer, Tom Radigan, Wil Sugai, Louise Turner, and David DiGiacomo to meet with me on Wednesday, April 28, 2004, at Applewood Baptist Church. All but Mr. DiGiacomo agreed to and did attend this neighborhood facilitation meeting. As ;m aside, when we invited these individuals to attend this 08/24/04 15:29 FAX 3037982777 BURNS FIGA & WILL 1a004 Bums, Figa & Will, P.C. August 23, 2004 Page 3 of 5 neighborhood facilitation meeting, we simultaneously notified all neighbors who had signed in at the April 13, 2004, neighborhood meeting and given addresses of this scheduled neighborhood facilitation meeting. By letter dated May 5, 2004, a copy of which was provided to Ms. Reckert at the time, I summarized the specific issues raised at this April 28, 2004, neighborhood facilitation group meeting and then began discussions of faese issues with representatives of Applewood Baptist Church. In my May 5, 2004, letter, I promised the members of this neighborhood facilitation group that, after representatives of Applewood Baptist Church had thoroughly considered these issues and other matters that had been raised and had developed responses to these issues, I would set up an additional meeting with the neighborhood facilitation group to discuss Applewood Baptist Church's responses to these and related issues- I also assured the members of the neighborhood facilitation group that we would schedule another meeting of the neighborhood facilitation group before we formally submitted its Special Use Permit application to the City of Wheat Ridge. As promised and at Pastor Wittman's direction, members of the Applewood Baptist Church design team did review and analyze the comments of the members of the neighborhood facilitation group, as well as comments which had been made at the earlier November 18, 2003, and April 13, 2004, general neighborhood meetings. After substantial review and, frankly substantial re-design to accommodate these comments, a second meeting of the neighborhood facilitation group was scheduled for Jul}, 12, 2004. As before, Cindy Klammer, Toa. Radigan, Wil Sugai, Louise Turner, and David DiGiacomo were invited to this July 12, 2004, meeting. In addition, Mark A. Sares, a neighbor residing on Quail Street who had, in the interim, expressed an interest in attending this second neighborhood facilitation group meeting, was invited to attend. While Mr. Radigan, Mrs. Klammer, and Mr. Sugai were not able to make the meeting, the others were in attendance. At this July 12, 2004, neighborhood facilitation group meeting, which fulfilled our commitment at the April 28, 2004, facilitation meeting to listen to neighbor concerns, to assess those and other concerns, and seek to accommodate those concerns, it was reported that Applewood Baptist Church, after seriously considering the comments of the community, had determined to modify the design of the new proposed education building, the first or "footprint" floor of which would comprise approximately 13,000 gross square feet, including the connecting transition building, on an east-west alignment rather than the originally proposed north-south alignment which had been proposed at the November 18, 2003, and April 13, 2004, neighborhood meetings. A number of additional matters were reported at this meeting, including that Applewood Baptist Church had agreed to replace old, existing lighting on the Church property on the north 08/24/04 .15:30 FAX 3037982777 BURNS FIGA & WILL - - U005 Burns, Figa & Will, P_C. August 23, 2004 Page 4 of 5 side of West 32°d Avenue with new, lest intrusive lighting which had been described at the April 13, 2004, neighborhood meeting. By letter dated July 15, 2004, a copy of which was provided to Ms. Reckert at the time, I summarized the specific matters discussed at this July 12, 2004, neighborhood facilitation group meeting. After more than one and one-half years of effort and expense and neighborhood meetings and communications of an extraordinary nature, Applewood Baptist Church is now ready to move to the next phase and seek approval of its Special Use Permit from the City of Wheat Ridge. It is probable that some resistance to any development on property on the north side of West 32"d Avenue which Applewood Baptist Church has owned since 1971 continues to exist. I do not believe, however, I have ever seen a more concerted and sincere effort to meet the concerns of neighbors during this proce:;s than the steps Applewood Baptist Church has taken over this period of time. Applewood Baptist Church has been a proud part of the Wheat Ridge-Lakewood community at its present location for more than 40 years. Applewood Baptist Church's proposed education building meets all standards established by the City of Wheat Ridge for, among other issues, traffic, drainage, parking, landscape, and lighting. If approved, Applewood Baptist Church's new education building will serve Applewood Baptist Church's needs for years to come. We are, of course, hopeful that the City of Wheat Ridge approves Applewood Baptist Church's Special Use Permit application without further and costly delay. We look forward to the opportunity to present our proposed plan to the Wheat Ridge City Council and other representatives of the City at as early a time as is mutually convenient and possible. As I have indicated in this letter, we have regularly provided copies of communications and correspondence in this process to Ms_ Reckert as a result of which she will be able to provide you with additional information. In this regard, we would like to express our appreciation to Ms. Reckert for her professional courtesy in dealing with our application. Also, if you have questions or require additional information, do not hesitate to contact me, Pastor Wittman, or Pastor Deardorff. We look forward to meeting with you and the members of the Wheat Ridge City Council on our proposal. S' cerely, 1 J. Norton F e Firm cc: Pastor Deardorff August 20, 2004 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department Attn: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Meredith, The attached represents the items required with a Land Use Processing Application ("Application") for the Consolidation Plat (already filed) and a Special Use Permit ("SUP") to build an additional Education Building, with associated Parking, on our Church property on the north side of 32nd Avenue. The Application has a check attached for the necessary fee(s) in the amount of $2,100.00 for 6 acres @ $300.00 per acre disturbed ($1800.00) plus $300.00 for the SUP Application. Other items under "Submittal Requirements" (back side of the Application) are as follows: • Proof of Ownership (copy of recorded deeds) • Certified Survey (Mountain States Engineering) • Mineral Rights Certification • Site Plan (James Moorhead, Architect) • List of Property Owners (some are beyond the required 100 feet) • Neighborhood Meeting (two meetings at Applewood Baptist Church, at 11200 W. 32nd Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033, on the evenings of 11/18/03 and 4113/04; you have names and addresses of attendees for the 4/13 meeting) • Legal Description (see "Certified Survey" above) • Building Elevations (James Moorhead, Architect) • Copy of Pre-Application Meeting Notes (3113/03; you have these) • Traffic Impact Study (Lantz & Associates) • Drainage Report (Mountain States Engineering) Other items included, but which were not required with the Application, are: Aerial Photograph of the Site and surrounding properties Photometrics for the Site Master Plan (James Moorhead, Architect) Landscape Plan for the Site (Staller & Henry, Landscape Architects) The following Development Plan gives the full intent and purpose of this request for 11225 West 32nd Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. Applewood Baptist Church owns 14.67 acres at the above address and wishes to fully develop 6+/- acres of this land. "Church use" was an acceptable use with the original zoning, but is not an acceptable use under the current R-1 Zoning. Therefore, the Church seeks to secure a Special Use Permit for it's development. The intent of Applewood Baptist Church is to execute the plan by adding another education building in 1-3 years. Should the Church pursue any future develop- ment beyond the education building they will repeat this process with the City. Current Conditions of the Site The land currently contains a blacktop parking lot, with three closely-spaced curb cuts within approximately 250' for access to and from 32nd Avenue, and an education building built in 1984/1985. Further back, beyond the education building, there is open space to Lena Gulch, and neighbors to the east have an unobstructed mountain view. Development Plan The plan meets, and in some cases, exceeds current guidelines of the City of Wheat Ridge for various elements such as parking, landscaping, site lighting, drainage, traffic circulation, and emergency services. In all cases, every effort was made to minimize any negative impact development might have on neighboring properties and to enhance the community with a thoughtful, park-like setting. It is our hope that this plan offers, not just a better facility to meet our needs, but also that it be perceived as an asset to the whole community. As a result of meetings with neighbors, the two education buildings will be situated forward (south) on the site-for easy recognition and a more attractive street-side presence. The blacktop parking lot will remain virtually as it is and will have a new connecting loop drive from the new north parking lot. Parking areas behind the buildings (to the North) will be low profile, gently sloping down toward Lena Gulch for optimum drainage and for minimal obstruction to the neighbor's mountain views. The parking area will have landscaped island separations and will be screened from neighboring property through the use of fencing and landscaping. Most of the land is dedicated to lawn, trees, shrubs and natural vegetation. The area from the parking lot to Lena Gulch will remain open space. Exterior lighting will take advantage of the latest technology with fixtures that have a light source that not only-efficiently illuminates-a large area, but can not be seen from the property line. Traffic circulation will be improved by allowing traffic to loop through the new parking areas back to existing parking lots. The loop road will allow for emergency vehicles and smooth traffic flow for all Church activities. The infrastructure will develop only as the new structure is built. Details follow. NEW EDUCATION BUILDING (1-3 YEARS) A. Purpose: To provide badly needed classroom and meeting space. It will contain a kitchen, classrooms, a fellowship hall and normal supplementary spaces. It will connect to the existing education building by an area with two elevators. This also improves handicap access in the existing education building. B. Style: The new education building will be a repetition of the existing Colonial style red brick education building with white trim. C. Fire Safety: The new education building will be fully equipped with fire suppression-sprinklers as is the existing education building. A new fire hydrant will be added at the north end along with a new fire line. A 30' wide drive for emergency and service vehicles will be provided with a loop road tied to the existing south parking lots. D. Parking: 196 spaces will be added to the north and east of the new education building, for a total of 392 spaces. Note: The existing parking lot in the southwest comer area of the site will remain virtually as it is. E. Exterior Lighting Layout not only meets City guidelines, but every effort has been made to minimize the impact to neighbors. The 24' pole fixtures are spaced at a distance from property lines such that the actual light source can not be seen by the neighbors. F. Landscape Only those elements of the landscape plan that pertain to the new education building and parking areas will be installed. G. Drainage: Most run-off will continue to flow to Lena Gulch as it does now. A new detention pond will be built as shown (see Drainage Plan). H. Traffic: Traffic flow will use only two-curb cuts; we will eliminate the two middle cuts and add a curb cut on the west side. 1. Utilities: Water requirements for this project will use the existing utilities without impact. FUTURE SITE DEVELOPMENT: The Church has no current plans to develop this site for other functions. Should the Church's needs require development in the next 15 years, this planning process with the City will be repeated at that time. We trust that this will meet with your approval Sincerely, 4Duu D rdorff 64 Executive Pastor Y\ LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicant eNtlyl &o rS I~rte. Address1/•yoo W . 31:t~ v, Phone~o3-Z3v-4S3S City f State CD Zip $0033 Fax 3n3- L3fi-iS3 Owner a tro-sc- ors` Y Address flW(, tw .~L}= Phone~a?-Y3i f~~/f City (A2 State 010 Zip Roo3'~ Fax 3n3-Y3S W?v='t City NA,, f-/eio_(s.c- State LU Zip 2o03 Fax ?o3-Y3X-7-SZ3 (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary. post public hearing signs, and will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing.) Location of request Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Application submittal requirements on reverse side ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions )56pecial Use Permit lK onsolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) ❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign ❑ Site Development Plan approval ❑ Variance/Waiver (from Section ) ❑ Other: of Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: - 0 S- d 6 5/ Size of Lot (acres or square Current Zoning: - Proposed Zonin _f~ Current Use: t4l rlas Quryjoses Proposed Use: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requ ted action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-alto y om the owner which a proved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Applicant , 7y Wubscribe an sworn to me this, d~ of A , 20_e4_ My commission expires 8 To be filled out by staff: Date received Fee $ -Receipt No. Case No. Comp Plan Desig. Zoning Quarter Section Map Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager X13 07/23/2004 1629 FAH t'LHNN1NU d I'W a~ N r4 ~ Cb QO The City of Wheat Ridge URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD Fax;3032352857 Ju `3 2004 16 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Planning Department 303-235-2845 NOTICE TO MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS APPLICANTS: You must submit this completed form to the Community Development Department no later than ten (10) days before the public hearing on your application. Failure to complete and submit this Certification of Notice shall constitute sufficient grounds to reschedule your public hearing. I, ,J7,~F/ Do2GGas e(/-r1tl,6L -r-61e of/with / &.k ~ 4 (Print name) (PositioNlob Title) e '(Entity applying or perrnit/approval) (hereinafter, the "Applicant"), do hereby certify that notice of the application for Pype of r ,set for public hearing on (describe type of application) 200, has been sent to all mineral estate owners at least thirty (30) days before the public hearing, as required by § 24-65.5-103(1), C.R.S., or, in the alternative, that the records of the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder do not identify any mineral estate owners of any portion of the property subject to the above referenced application. V~J Check here if there are: no mineral estate owners of any portion of the subject property. I hereby further certify that I am authorized by the Applicant to make representations contained herein and act as the Applicant's agent for purposes of this Certificate of Notice and bind the Applicant to these representations by my signature below. Dated this day of Z00 13y: City of Wheat Ridge "ti~~r~ Community Development Department Memoranda C~<QRPO~ TO: Randy Young, City Manager FROM: Alan White,. Community Development Director SUBJECT: Applewood Baptist Church DATE: July 20,2004 Meredith Reckert has been the principal staff contact for this project. She returned from vacation this week and received the following information via letter. The letter was a copy of a letter sent to the six "facilitation committee" members summarizing their meeting with the Church. This meeting was held between the Church and neighborhood representatives on July 12, 2004. Church representatives in attendance included their attorney; Mike Norton, and their civil engineer, Gary Theander. Neighborhood representatives in attendance were Louise Turner, David Di(iacomo and Mark Sares. Cindy Klautmer, Tom Radigan, and Will Sugai were unable to attend. Although we have not seen the new plan, it is our understanding that the following changes have occurred in response to neighborhood concerns. 1, The new structure was relocated and reoriented from a north-south alignment to an east west alignment to allow for view retention for the neighbors to the east. The new structure has a slightly reduced footprint and building height. 1 want to stress that we have notseen aplan and we don't know exactly whatmodifications have been made. 2, If the expansion is approved, the Church has agreed to replace the existing, intrusive parking lot lighting with new lighting. Other items discussed at the meeting included the amount of fill dirt required for the new structure, on-site drainage, pending improvements to Lena Gulch, establishment of a conservation easement on the north end of the property and use of the property as a charter school. A neighbor, via voice mail, inquired whether we would require another large-scale-r. meeting to discuss the changes. It is my position that the church has already fulfillo requirement fora neighborhood meeting and would not be required to have another. We anticipate that the Church will make format application within a week. Meredith Reckert From: Pete Kammer [pklammer@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 3:08 PM To: Applewood Familes for Residential Values Cc: Meredith Reckert Subject: ABC meeting On Monday July 12, 2004 Dear Pete: Please feel free to circulate this summary: Subject: RE: ABC meeting On Monday July 12, 2004 ABC has a new plan. The now want to orient the new building east to west. ABC gave out only three color copies of the new plan. It looks like they may have had this "new plan" in mind all along. One could reasonably conclude that they practiced a "bait and switch" when they showed us the objectional plan knowing all along that they had the new one in mind. Leeanne thinks that they might be thinking about expanding the current sanctuary to avoid problems with the citizens of Wheat Ridge in building a new sanctuary. The Monday meeting was short. Apparently they only invited a few people. I was only invited late last week. Mark Sares was invited even though he was not at the last meeting. Mark didn't have as much information as Louise Turner and I did. Mark mostly asked questions about lighting and detention ponds. We were the only neighbors or citizens at the meeting. Mr. Norton, ABC's engineer, and a political consultant-spin doctor were there on behalf of ABC. Louise asked good questions but I had a sense that Louise was more at ease with the new plan since it affects her little. ABC told us that Urban Drainage and Flood Control is going to do more work on Lena Gulch soon and the dirt that comes out will go to the church. In all the church will bring in more than 750 truck loads of dirt to build the new building. More dirt than that will be moved before the project is finished; about 10,000 yards by their calculations. I asked for the new plan with the contours on it. Mr. Norton made me promise to pay $2.50 for the copy or he wouldn't. give it to me. I haven't seen the copy yet. They claim the roof line on the new building will be reduced by 2-4 feet over the current roof line. I still think it will violate the code with regard to height restrictions. I think the old building violates the previous and current codes. They do not believe that traffic is an issue at all and no turn lanes are planned. The new building will have a larger kitchen and a banquet hall and they do plan torent it out to people who don't go to the church. They say they will not put in a school while they own it but this is a perfect set up to build the building and sell the site to a charter school and move the church campus to a new location. Why else would they build a building this large that won't be used but a few hours a week? Mr. Norton is very active in Republican politics. It is a primary focus of the Republican party to have vouchers. Colorado is a battle ground and millions of dollars are being poured in from out of state regarding vouchers. I believe Applewood Baptist sees vouchers and a school in their future. Once they build the building and if vouchers are approved they will say they have a right to operate a school asa matter of religious liberty and we will then have two major schools within a block. Also, what do they plan to do with the back 7 acres? They wouldnt say. It looks like a perfect set up for ball fields and a stadium or play fields for a school They claimed that they have no plans at the moment to use the rest of the property. They also wouldn't tell us when they plan to submit the application but from the looks of the plans it will be soon. Regarding the structure and process of the meeting: I asked Mr. Norton to wait a few minutes to see if more citizens would appear and he refused. He either didn't care about anyone else who would attend or he knew no one else would attend. He stood over us the whole time even though there was a table and he could have been sitting. They only brought three or four copies of 1 the new plan reduced to 8 x 14 and the larger plan they had no copies of. Mr. Norton did ask for questions at the end and the questions they were not able to answer they said they would research. The spin doctor watched and took notes. He appears to be a high priced consultant and I think he was sizing us up. dave David R. DiGiacomo Attorney at Law DiGiacomo & Jaggers, LLP 5400 Ward Road, Bldg. III, Ste. 200 Arvada, CC 80002 Phone: 303-420-4220 Fax: 303-423-4840 A full service law firm concentrating in Custody and Divorce, Personal Injury, Worker's Compensation, Business Law, Litigation, Appeals and Wills, Trusts, Probate and Estate Law. Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970),. IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182/ Mailto:PKlammer@ACM.org "Either Be Good, or Else Be Careful, but Do Have Fun! " 2 Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert [mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:25 PM To: Alan White Subject: Update on Applewood Church This email is intendedto update you on the most recent activity relating to the pending SUP application for expansion of the Applewood Baptist Church at 11220 W. 32nd Avenue. Another meeting was held between church and neighborhood representatives on July 12, 2004. Church representatives in attendance included their attorney, Mike Norton, and their civil engineer, Gary Theander. Neighborhood representatives in attendance were Loiuse Turner, David DiGiacomo and Mark Sares. Although I have not seen the new plan, it is my understanding that the following changes have occured in response to neighborhood concerns. 1. The new structure was reoriented from a north-south alignment to an east-west alignment to allow for view retention for the neighbors to the. east. The new structure has a slightly reduced footprint and building height. 2. If the expansion is approved, the church has agreed to replace the existing, intrusive parking lot and structure lighting with new lighting. Other items discussed at the meeting included the amount of fill dirt required for the new structure, on-site drainage, pending improvements to Lena Gulch, establishment of a conservation easement on the north end of the property and use of the property as a charter school. Pete Klammer; via voice mail, inquired whether we would require another large-scale neighborhood meeting to discuss the changes. It is my position that the church has already met the code requirement and would not be required to have another. If you disagree, please let me know. I believe that the church intends on making formal application by the end of this week. 1 07/16/2004 14:43 7204933160 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 01/05 B S Fig0- wilip.c. TELECOPIER TRANSMITTAL SHEET RECEIVING TELECOPY NO: 303-234-5924 DATE: JULY 16, 2004 TIME. 2:32 PM DELIVER TO: MEREDITH RECKERT FROM: MICHAEL J. NORTON COMMENTS: PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED. FILE NO.: 2269.00 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE (AND ANY DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYING IT) IS CONFIDCNTIAL AND MTFNDP.D ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE, THIS TRANSMISSION MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY THE LAWYER/CLIENT PRIVILEGE, TI-1E LAWYER WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE OR BOTH. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE. DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU RAW RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR PLEASE NOTIFY THIS OFFICE IMMEDIATELY TO ARRANGE FOR ITS RETURN. IF YOU RAVI- ANY PROBLEMS RECEIVING THIS TRANSMIISSION, PLEASE CALL 303-796-2626. ORIGINAL DOCUMENT(S): CONFIRMATION COPY WILL BE MAILED CONFIRMATION COPY WILL BE SENT BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY FACSM41LE COPY ONLY 6400 SOUTH FIDDLERS GREEN CIRCLE - SUITE 1030 - ENGLE WOOD, CO 80111 TELEPHONE: 303-796-2626 - FACSIMILE: 303-796-2777 07/16/2004 14:43 F Cindy Klammer 3200 Routt Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Tom Radigan 1.0845 W. 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Will Sugai 11158 W. 33`d Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Louise Turner 11256 W. 38`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 BURNS FIGA & WILL July 15, 2004 David R. DiGiacomo, Esq, (via facsimile: 303-423-4840) 5400 Ward Road, Bldg. 111, Suite 200 Arvada, CO 80002-1822 Mark A. Sares, Esq. (via facsimile: 303-388-1749) 40 South Colorado Boulevard, Suite 900 Denver, CO 80246 Re: Anolewood,Baptist Church Our File No. 2269.00 Ladies and Gentlemen: PAGE 02/05 K C-1 IAEL J. NORTON min o rton 0b`w-law. corn Thanks to those of you who participated in the July 12, 2004, meeting relating to Applewood Baptist Church's (the "Church") anticipated application to the City of Wheat Ridge for development of the Educational Building to adjoin the existing educational facility on the north side of West 32nd Avenue. We are sorry that Mr. Radigan, Mrs. Klammer, and Mr. Sugai were not able to make the meeting. Dale Jones had understood from Mrs. Klammer and Mr. Sugai that both would be in attendance at the July 12 meeting. However, Dale advises me that he was unable to speak directly to Mr. Radigan and thus left messages for him about the meeting- 7204933160 BunNS FICA & W11 I RC. ATT.IRNhYS AT LAW 6400& rddlor'9 Gn;eri Circle. Suito 1030 - Engleword, CU 801 11 • P 303 796 26?6 303 7062717 - mAmwbtw-18W rnm 07/16/2004 14:43 7204933160 BURNS FIGA & WILL . PAGE 03/05 July 15, 2004 Page 2 As you will recall, this July 12 meeting was in fulfillment of our commitment at the April 28, 2004, facilitation meeting to listen to your concerns, to assess those and other concerns, and seek to accommodate those concerns. This April 28 facilitation meeting followed two neighborhood meetings which had been held at the Church during the preceding months. During the July 12 meeting, Church representatives present included me, Dale Jones, and project engineer Gary Theander. It was explained to those present that, while we had hoped to have project architect James Moorhead present, a crisis on an Arapahoe County project made it impossible for Mr. Moorhead to attend this meeting. Those present from the "facilitation committee" were Mrs. Turner and Mr. DiGiacomo. Mr. Sares, a neighbor who resides on Quail Street and who had, since the April 28 meeting, expressed a desire to attend this July 12 meeting, was also present at the meeting. In response to the issues raised during the two neighborhood meetings and the April 28 facilitation meeting, Church representatives reported that the Church had taken the comments of the community seriously and had determined as follows: The design of the new education building has been substantially modified. Attached is a copy of a "progress print" which shows this re-design. As you will note, the proposed building is designed on an east-west alignment as opposed to the north-south alignment which was proposed in the earlier meetings. The first floor of the proposed building will comprise, approximately 11,900 gross square feet. The interior design of the building is yet to be completed. However, it is anticipated that it will contain about 18 classrooms, a large kitchen, a multi- purpose room, and a number of utility rooms. As you may recall, the land owned by the Church is somewhat more than 14 acres. As you may. determine from the enclosed "progress print," the land area covered by the proposed building, including the parking lot and detention area, will be less than one-half of the land owned by the Church, This design was accepted by the Church to accommodate those neighbors, mostly to the east and on Quail Street, who felt the former design would obstruct mountain views. Having walked the property several times, it appears to me that this concern has been fully met. 2. The questions of the amount of fill dirt required for the new building had been previously raised at the April 28 facilitation meeting. This question is difficult to answer with precision. However, project engineer Thean.der has provided a rough estimate that 7,412 cubic yards of additional dirt will be required for this new design. It is believed that this estimate is high. This number results from the estimate that 1,662 cubic yards will come from the site and 9,074 cubic yards total will be required. Again, these estimates are rough and believed high. We have been advised that dump trucks accommodating 20 cubic yards will be available; that means that a maximum of 370 dump trucks will access the site during construction. We have learned, however, that his number of trucks moving onto 07/16/2004 14:43 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL - PAGE 04/05 July 15, 2004 Page 3 the Church's property may be substantially reduced if suggestions that the Urban Drainage Flood Control District may implement revisions to the current drainage system on and near the Church's property develop concurrently with the Church's proposal. In that event, it is anticipated that a substantial amount of fill dirt will be created by the District's re-design which may be available to the Church for use in the project and would offset the need to bring dirt on-site. In any event, assuming the Church's proposal is approved by the City of Wheat Ridge, the Church intends to work with the facilitation committee to schedule these trucks to the most convenient times possible. 3. The issue of replacing old, existing lighting at the Church property with the new, less intrusive lighting proposed during the neighborhood meetings had been previously raised at the April 28 facilitation meeting- The Church has committed, assuming the Church's proposal is approved by the City of Wheat Ridge, to replace the existing lighting with the more aesthetically-pleasing new lighting. 4. The issue of the commitment of a portion of land oa the north half of the Church's property as a wildlife conservation easement had been previously raised at the April 28 facilitation meeting. While the Church will continue consideration of this possibility, the Church is not prepared to make any permanent commitment of this property for such a purpose. The Church has absolutely no development plans beyond the new education building. Moreover, in response to some concerns, the Church plans to use the new education building for religious purposes and does not have any plans to create a charter or other public/private school which would utilize this new facility. 5. The issue of drainage on the Church's property, particularly the north half of the Church's property, had been previously raised at the April 28 facilitation meeting. While this is an issue largely under the control of the Urban Drainage Flood Control District, we understand that, during the recent heavy rains in the area, there was minimal flooding on the Church's property and the water which did congregate on the Church's property dissipated in a relatively short time. The plans of the Urban Drainage Flood Control District will, as we understand it, further ameliorate this issue once implemented. Questions that were raised by Mr. DiGiacomo about the style of the fence on the Church's eastern border are under review. Also, Mr. DiGiacomo asked for a larger copy of the enclosure. That is being created and, when ready, will be provided to Mr. DiGiacomo. At this point, the Church will proceed to finalize its application to the City of Wheat Ridge based on this revised proposal. When that happens is a function of the availability of a number of people, including Mr. Moorhead who, as indicated above, is involved in another project requiring his attention. I am certain that you will be notified of the submittal by the City of Wheat Ridge. 07/16/2004 14:43 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 05/05 July 15, 2004 Page 4 Thank you for your courtesy. We very much appreciate your participation in this facilitation process. We believe you will agree that the Church has made dramatic modifications to its initial proposal based upon the comments of the neighborhood. As always, if you have questions, do not hesitate to contact me. hael J. Norton the Firm cc: Pastor Deardorff Meredith Reckert (via Facsimile: 303-234-5924) ~'1 e4 City of "hea`Po°ge MEMORANDUM Departrr~d of Pub6c Works TO: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer FROM: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager 5N DATE: Friday, June 11, 2004 SUBJECT: Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32"' Avenue, Traffic Impact Review #1 I have reviewed the traffic impact study for the above project dated February 2004 and have the following comments it appears that the proposed expansion is considered as an increase in the support facilities (or secondary use). The traffic increase related to the expansion needs to be projected accordingly. As related to this proposed expansion, additional data and discussion are needed to support the 200/o increase to church traffic as indicated in the study. As a suggestion, yearly membership counts can also be provided to assist in establishing the potential background growth. 2. Since the proposed west access will function similar to an offset intersection with Robb Street. Please allow adequate distance to minimize left turn conflicts. A discussion is needed to address this configuration in terms of traffic operation and safety. 3. Please provide a trip generation table to identified existing and new traffic generated by this expansion. This will include any peak hours of the adjacent streets or the generator. 4. LOS calculation needs to address both short and long-term traffic for all locations. 20-year horizon will be used as long-term traffic condition. 5. Traffic counts and LOS analyses will need to be included for the intersection of Quail and Robb at 32"' Avenue since they are part of church traffic circulation and access. 6. Traffic count will need to be a full hour of the busiest period as needed for standard analysis. 7. Please indicate other time of the week when the facility has a significant use. Include traffic figures if they considered significant for analysis. 8. Parking supply seems to be adequate for current use based on observations conducted by the Public Works Department. However, additional parking will need to be identified and addressed to accommodate the proposed expansion to prevent overflow onto adjacent streets. Overflow parking on adjacent streets tends to have traffic impacts on the neighborhoods in various ways based on previous experiences, cc: Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works City of Wheat Depaihned of Pubic W011135 June 14, 2004 Mr. Fred Lantz Lantz Associates 13335 W. 72nd Circle Arvada, CO 80005 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 Re: - First review comments for the Traffic Impact Study for the Applewood Baptist Church Subdivision located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. Dear Mr. Lantz, The City of Wheat Ridge Engineering Division Manager, Mr. Steven Nguyen, P.E. has completed the initial review of the Traffic Impact Study received on April 19, 2004 for the proposed development, and has the following comments: Traffic Impact Study Please see attached sheet. The above comments are as of the date reviewed and may not reflect all comments from other departments or reviewing agencies. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cc: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner File AWewwd BWtW Sub nfliicSmdy-mviewl.hrAm 05/06/04 15:57 FAX 3057962777 BURNS FIGA & WILL 0 002 Fi Cindy Klammer 3200 Routt Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Tom Radigan 10845 W. 32°d Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Will Sugai 11158 W. 3P Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Louise Turner 11256 W. 3e' Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 May 4, 2004 Re: ApAZewoodBa,ptistChur:h Our File No. 2269.00 Ladies and Gentlemen: Thank you for participating in the Applewood Baptist Church's (the "Chu-c for development of the Educational Build north side of West 32°d Avenue. MICHAEL JNoRION mj norton®bfw-law. com il 28 facilitation meeting in connection with anticipated application to the City of Wheat Ridge to adjoin the existing educational facility on the I have received and reviewed Mr. Sugai's summary of the meeting, As promised, I am now in the process of discussing the specific lcomments raised during the meeting with representatives of Applewood Baptist Church, including technical personnel, to determine how the Church may wish to respond to specific comments that were raised. As 1 have reviewed my notes and those prepared by Mr. Sugai, I believe the following issues were raised at our meeting: 1. What is the Church's po;>ition on formal mediation? Mediation is simply a process whereby another perslon guides discussion; but is not designed to bring about a specific result. It is often used in civil litigation, however, successful BURNS REA a WILL RC. Ai fOHNSYS Al LAw 6400S. Fddler's Green Circle, Sulha 1030 • Englewood, CO 80111 - P: :M 796 2626 • F: 303 796 2777 www,bfw-law.com . 05/06/04 15:57 FAX 3037862777 BURNS FIGA & 'RILL May 4, 2004 Paget Z003 mediators are quite costly and add an additional layer to the process, We believe that men and women of good will can respectfully discuss issues and either reach compromise on a given issue or agree to disagree on that issue. It is my belief that we achieved this level of respectful and mature communication last week and that it can be expected that this will continue in the future so that a mediator is not required. For these reasons, the Church does not believe formal mediation would serve any useful purpose. 2. What is the Church's "timeline" for the submission of an application to the City of Wheat Ridge for development of the Education Building? While the Church has no specific timeline 3t this time and wants to give this facilitation process a chance to work so that there is at least one additional facilitation meeting with you, subject to modifica:ions to accommodate specific concerns of neighbors which you have raised azd which the Church will consider and may incorporate into its present plan, the Church does intend to submit an application to the City of Wheat Ridge at the point that this facilitation process has been completed. 3_ Does the Traffic Study that was distributed at the April 13, 2004, Neighborhood Meeting represent a valid analysis of anticipated traffic expected to be generated by the use of the new &ucation Building? The statistical study was performed in February 2004, before the Church began to use Prospect Valley Elementary School for overflow parldrig. Thus, there is no distortion to the Traffic Study as a result of the use of this overflow parking. In addition, it is my understanding that the Traffic Study is, ind(:ed, valid and utilizes techniques that are both accepted and relied upon by municipalities, including the City of Wheat Ridge. Nevertheless, I will discuss this matter with representatives of the Church, including Fred Lantz of Lantz Associates who has performed the Traffic Study, and respond at a later tirae, 4. Does the Church have a "master plan" for future development on the property after the Education Building is completed? There is no "master plan" for the future development of the property once the Education Building is completed, Historic "master plans" have been submitted by the Church at the instruction of officials of the City of Wheat Ridge, When such "master plans" were requested by officials of the City of Wheat Midge, Church representatives advised that the Church had no specific additional development plans. Officials of the City of Wheat Ridge informed (:hutch representatives that this did not matter; rather, it was a requirement of the City of Wheat Ridge that a conceptual "master plan" be submitted. Thus, "mast :r plans" submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge, while satisfying this requirement, do not reflect anyone's plan for future development or use of the property. Frankly, in hindsight, the submission of such "master plans" has caused more confusion and mis-information in the community than was justified or necessary. 05/06/04 15:58 FAX 3037962777 BURNS FIGA & WILL yy004 May 4, 2004 Page 3 What happens when the Church outgrows the current facilities, including the proposed Education Building? First, the mission of the Church is to share the Good News of the Gosp-ti of Jesus Christ with its neighbors and, in so doing, grow in numbers. Only God knows whether the Church will, in fact, grow to the point that it has outgrown the current facilities, including the proposed Education Building, If that should happen, it is quite clear that any subsequent proposed development of the property would be required to go through the City's Special Use Permit Process as it may then exist. All the issues that we are currently discussing would have to be revisited at that time, 6. Why cannot the proposed Education Building look more residential, both as to design and as to height, :n its architectural design? While this may well be one of those areas where we must respectfully agree to disagree, I will discuss this issue with representatives of the Church and respond at a later time. 7_ In relation to the total amount of property owned by the Church on the north side of West 32"a Avenue, what is the square footage of the existing parking lot pavement? What will be: the square footage of the proposed parking) lot pavement? 1 will obtain these statistics from representatives of the Church and respond at a later time. How will the potential flow of water off the Church's property and t ward the north of the Church's property be mitigated? In this regard, Mrs. Telmer expressed the view that, while the proposed detention pond was a good idea, it should have been done n1 the past. It is my understanding that there already is a detention pond on the Church's property; but the proposed detention pond will further minimize drainage and flood potential issues. It is my furtber understanding that the proposed detention pond will serve only as 9 overflow area in the event of heavy flood-type rains and will not retain water ~or any appreciable time as if it were a lalce. A contrary concern was expres ed that the detention pond would be a potential West Nile Virus "breeding gro;d(." In this regard, it is my understanding that the threat of West Nile Virus is aggravated by drought conditions, not excessive water conditions. According to Colorado Department of Public Health officials I have consulted, this accounts for the problems experienced in Colorado the last two years. However, if a y of you have any scientific data to support this contention concerning West ile Virus, please provide it to me a: your early convenience. I will discuss this matter and related drainage concern; raised during the facilitation meeting with representatives of the Church, the engineers, and other appropriate p~rsons and respond at a later time. 9. Is it possible to commit some land on the north end of the Church's Oroperty to a wUdlife/conservation area? I will discuss this matter with representatives of the Church and respond at a later time. 05/06/04 15:58 FAX 3037962777 BURNS FIGA & WILL 14005 May 4, 2004 Page 4 10. Can the existing lighting system be upgraded with the newer lights c the April 13, 2004, Neighborhood Meeting? Also, can the lights be when the property is not in use? I wil l discuss these matters VAtb rel of the Church and respond at a later time. 11. Can the Church provide more detail about the interior design of the Education Building so ar. to assure that there are no plans to use the Education Building for public, private or charter school purposes? . will discuss these matters with representatives of the Church and re; later time, it is my understanding that there are no plans to use the p Education Building or, f3rthat matter, any other existing Church fa Church-related uses. A6ditionally, as was made clear by Ms. Recki 13, 2004, meeting, any use of the proposed Education Building for or charter school purpos es would require the Church to seek approv of Wheat Ridge for any such use through the Special Use Permit Pr 12. Wouldn't it be better for the Church to spend its money upgrading t education building? While I believe the answer to be "no" and the i thoroughly explained the need for the proposed Education Building other times, the April 13, 2004, Neighborhood Meeting, I will discu matters with representatives of the Church and respond at a later tin 13. Is it possible to redesign the proposed Education Building so that it West 32nd Avenue in an east-west alignment rather than in the prop south alignment? 1 will discuss this matter with representatives of i respond at a later time. :d at off at a ity for non- at the April blic, private of the City existing )rch has among these rallels with d north- Church and Although I believe these were the primary issues discussed during our facilitation meeting, if you believe I have omitted any critical specific issues, do not hesitate to ie et me know. I would prefer that you do so in writing so that I will understand the thrust and subs ante of any additional specific issue you believe ha;: been omitted from the foregoing list. Plea note that I did not list our word lesson, including the word "unctuous," given by Mr. Radigan. I am now in the process of discussing these specific issues with representati es of the Church. After representatives of the Church have had the opportunity to thoroughly digest these matters and to develop responses, I will contact you to set up an additional facilitate n meeting to discuss the Church's responses to these and related issues. I assure you that this ad itional facilitation meeting will occur before the Church submits its application to the City of Wheat Ridge. Because I do not know how long; it may take representatives, including tec representatives, of the Church to respond to these and related issues, I have no speTitcal c date for another meeting .in .mind. However, it will be my goal to set up such a meeting in , out 30 days. 05/06/04 15:58 FAX 3037962777 BURNS FIGA & WILL la 006 May 4, 2004 Page 5 Mr. Sugai suggested that there may be others in the neighborhood with concerns different from those raised above. I am amenable to considering inclusion of ad( in the next facilitation meeting, provided the group is not made so large that it be unmanageable. Again, I would ask that you do so in writing so that I will under, and substance of any additional specific issues others may have. Also, because I had a conflict on Wednesday evenings, I will seek to set up this meeting on a Tu Thursday evening. Thank you for your courtesy. If you have questions, do not hesitate to l J. Norton Firm nal people Les Ithe thrust HIammer y or t me. cc: Pastor Deardorff Meredith Reckert ("Via Facsimile: 303-234-5924) 05/06/04 15:59 FAX 3037962777 BURNS FIGA & WILL Z007 F Erick Whittier 11250 W. 21h Place Lakewood, CO 80215 C. May 6, 2004 Re: Applewood Baptist Church Education Building Dear Mr. Whittier: As you may recall from the Afail 13, 2004, Neighborhood Meeting which represent Applewood Baptist Church (the "Church") in connection with its.anticil application to the City of Wheat Ridgc! for the development of an educational faci the existing facility on the north side of West 3Zd Avenue, We wanted you to know that, subsequent to this Neighborhood Meeting, representative neighbors, each of whom had spoken at the April 13, 2004, Neigh Meeting on somewhat different issues, to meet with us on Wednesday, April 28, Church believed it would be useful to continue the dialogue to see if there were 1 could accommodate our mutual interests in such areas or concerns as facility des configuration, wildlife protection, and drainage impact. The five representative neighbors we invited to this facilitation meeting Cindy 1Qammer 3200 Routt Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Tom Radigan 10845 W.32 Id Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wil Sugai 11158 W, 33d Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Louise Turner 11256 W. 38d Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 MICHAEL J. NORTON mjrortcn@b(w-law, c om attended, I to adjoin invited five 4. The the Church and BURNS FICA & WILL P.C. AT I ONNEYS AT LAW 6400 S. Fiddler; GrPGn Circle, Suite 1030 - Eri0lewood, CO riot i i • P. 303 7N6 2626 - F 303 796277? • www.blw-law,com 05/08/04 15:59 FAX 3037962777 BURNS FIGA & WILL a 008 May 6, 2004 Page 2 David R. DiGiacomo 3275 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mr. DiGiacomo declined to participate in this facilitation meeting. Howe Turner, Mr. Sugai, Mrs. Klammei, and Mr. Radigan did attend and participate in My job, at the request of the Church';, Pastor Calvin Wittman, was to listen to sp, recommendations by these neighbors about the proposed project and then meet w representatives of the Church, including technical people, to discuss these specifrl recommendations to determine the Church's response to these issues. When the 1 responses are formulated, we agreed to have at least one additional meeting befor submits its application to the City of Wheat Ridge to discuss the Church's respon discussed. Enclosed is a copy of a letter to Mrs. Turner, Mr. Sugai, Mrs. Klammer, a which outlines the results of this facilitation meeting. As you will note, Mr. Suga the meeting, promised to draft minute;; from his recording- As a result there may additional issues which I missed in my summary of the issues discussed which th want to address. When all substantive and specific issues have been identified, it that, as soon as the Church has formulated its responses, I would contact Mrs. TM Mrs. Klammer, and Mr_ Radigan to ser. up at least one additional meeting so as to Church's position on these matters before the application is finalized and submitti Wheat Ridge. While each one of the individuals who attended this facilitation meeting with that person's view of the meeting„ I thought the meeting and the discussion constructive, responsible, and positive. I look forward to getting back together N Mr. Sugai, Mrs_ Klammer, and Mr. Radigan at the next meeting which is to be si the Church has had the opportunity to prepare responses to these issues. If you have questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Enclosure J. Norton Mrs. meeting, the Church s to the issues d Mr. Radigan who recorded e some Church will vas agreed er, Mr. Sugai, :port the I to the City of provide you Mrs. Turner, luled when 05/06/04 15:59 FAX 3037962777 BURNS FIGA & WILL 0 009 May 6, 2004 Page 3 cc: Pastor beardorf (without enclosure) Meredith Reckert (Via Facsimile: 303-234-5924) (without enclosure) Mrs. Turner (without enclosun°) Mr. Sugai (without enclosure) Mrs. Klammer (without enclosure) Mr. Radigan (without enclosure) -JAN DAI~ 5re~, (J,j (L~ Ck 3 t-0 3zfis c~~~ \ ~t v53 Vj Board of County Commissioners Michelle Lawrence District No. 1 Patricia B. Holloway District No. 2 Richard M. Sheehan District No. 3 May 2, 2004 rte' y tp Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Community Development Department City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 50215-6713 Re: Jefferson County Mediation Services (JCMS) Case #04-0174 APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH ("ABC") REZONING REQUEST FACILITATION Dear Ms. Reckert: Enclosed please find a copy of the completed Case Referral document (with attachment and facilitators assigned) for JCMS Case #04-0174. I have received the report of our lead facilitator for this case, Maureen O'Reilly noting that the facilitated public meeting was held, as requested, and facilitated by her and Mary Dodd on 4/13/04. As I understand it from Maureen, the meeting was videotaped by ABC and the concerned citizens in attendance, and the two sides agreed to exchange videotapes after the meeting. Other than that, this was simply a meeting designed for information exchange, and no further agreements were reached. I also understand that no further meetings of this type are planned relating to this rezoning request by ABC. Therefore, I am closing our facilitation case in this matter. I should note that I recently received a copy of a letter from one of the nearby property owners, David DiGiacomo that was directed to the attorney for ABC, Michael Norton. This letter suggested a structured mediation between community representatives and ABC relating to ABC's rezoning request. It further suggested that I be appointed as the mediator. As concerns this suggestion, I have the following response on behalf of myself and JCMS. Should you, as representative of the City of Wheat Ridge, formally request JCMS to conduct such a mediation (with, of course, agreement to participate by both sides), we would be glad to create a new case file and assigned a mediation team to it. However, based upon my long association with ABC's attorney, Michael Norton, and the fact that Mr. DiGiacomo's wife is a volunteer mediator for JCMS, I would not feel comfortable being the mediator in this matter. Until and unless we receive such a new request from you, this matter will remain closed as far as JCMS activities are concerned. Justice Services Department Mediation Services 700 Jefferson County Parkway, Ste. 220, Golden, Colorado 80401-6018 (303) 271-5060 9 This concludes the activities of Mediation Services with Case #04-0174. Thanks for your faith in our Program. Please call me at (303) 271-5062 if you have any questions or comments about this case. Sincerely, *L6-~-k Mark S. Loye, JCMS Director Enclosure cc: Pete Klammer, Applewood Families for Residential Values Calvin Wittman and Duffy Deardorff, Applewood Baptist Church Michael Norton, Attorney for Applewood Baptist Church David DiGiacomo, Concerned Citizen Maureen O'Reilly, Floyd Borakove, Mary Dodd and Chanin Paul, Facilitators PLANNING & PW hax:6U626t)2b( Mar 12 2UU4 lb:16 r.UL MAR-B-2004 1334 FROM:SEFFCO.MEDIATION.9ER 303-271-5064 T0:93032352857 P:2/3 JKFFEMN COUNTY MEDIATJON SERV[CU MEDIATION CASE REFERRAL TO: Ptup= Administrator Jefferson Cotmty Mediation Services QCMS) 700 Jefferson County Parkway, Suite 270, Goldea, CO 8040) 271-5060, Fax 271-5064 RUM" 14 BY: ll n COURT - Ri1:GULATORY - liNF'ORCU T PRUMVINGS gwecAvlt.pw "PU114tl n CONFLICT SUMMRY too +.«ap TWO ++qp 7500 cv. LN /rV5 W. ~Q. GPJ AAk~ 303-Z35'"ZAyf~ 303 -235--Z85 T sia Cl C.KCMN WA& 0 V oew - rkxiraasA.a rl owwften omw _ - » AV*q Ci awwom.Nb. T OO- tt~...gm se. 1Pae Picm copy apd attach Ctle information relevant to this dispute. i77I ^EZ,/C~fG- C-Ar 21D6r& C'Cm/hG(N /00- l-J(Ar vn/45-2 E W -r p c=pT Pw1 NLHNNIN6 & NW FdX:JUOLMZ63r rldr Lt Zw4 IQ. 10 r.uo MPR-8-2004 13:34 FROM:SFFFCO.MEDIATION.SER 393-271-5064 Ta:93032352857 ArSFUTANTS of flan been 0kawkd ntgel enedim in 0 Yep ❑ No R~a(merded ~K 0( Y. ❑ No P:313 Nl171«. edd~4, tk(L~IIGdF iwmlxrs ofdi9pamnla It•NO+e lh~l fwrc, hst~~pa:rtacte~ iodinate below ftt Mom acc MVUhV& /rl C~ PAF eVoi9TOA1 6)E R-AO-Let"OD 6APT75~ Clk(en4 Ns.(q rv VC0 s. ,r r3 9C en S' Gyr.4 FE C'r~«z-~_ , u r_r-z l63 o - Addredt e'/V G-eb W 0C'n C C-0 ~01 It 3031 Tfr-6Ser SO 3 - -4-fle - zb Z ~x #Z CA rrf~/ JiT7 ~ ~buG~y PeAeDOP-r-r- Nee be caAndcd Nw*K*) wow MrA.ie! Z.00 W . 3 -Z ' /W E ; Wr-f~.9 1zr ~[,•C- e r'r~ X0'3 3 0 ya ❑ we Adder aarerr '303 z3~- `~5 U~ 3 z3~_- ~~r3 Yn Ow. nw aeact.77e~ FJ4K ' #3 *ILAIWMCQrAEoJ CGJB067 FAMtrrEi jE~-d,,E! ,etcrPeA=gL. ✓A&"Cj~ FW bs oeo4n2ed N..qs) .eal .dnuao 21) Q lz o 4e 7'T-. l ❑ Y'a ~No Addrese Ra d P-14V •r 303 - 9 rS - Z C-13 Q r~ 13 N. N~ ens At4 Iz6+~P_~ PC-t /*1OA&7, u0 01 D F,4 6 41'(1e~ F/4:Yt r~gc vA~u~S m, kM d.dnged Nr.ga) AhWAUM&MkO ❑ Y( ❑ N. AA*t Re"Awpmancagp - .3U3 - z e Z- Z Z 3 d` ❑ Ya n No xgr*4 a w.khm 90rneea Are there more than fbw dispacanw 4Y. O Na If yes, how maw. UfS 1 -1 NOW ]riease copy ama attach file information relevant to this dispute. k■kM#!at!##d;li!##!k!!!#####!##k!#!k###k#+e4d'YfIAR{Al+k#y«k+F#T!!!###k#l~Fkkkk#!#r##!!!!$#M+# JCMS Staff use Only ASSIGNMENT Case No. 09 -0 174t Date M a r d 1 a o o M w otR~1 Mediator Ca-MediatorS:GLuaSn ~c. qG nary ~p~{e1 Notes yec AB-,I- Col1" "F v1 1 Af _-F ~ _ bM~1PacIUYcSatnllj~doc4110 P 2 Rav. Loma FLHNN1Nb 6 NW rax;oU3t33Z6Dr riai i< Zw4 IQ-I~ City of Wheat Ridge Cotzlxxlunity Development Department Memorandum TO: Mark Loye, Jefferson County Mediation Program Director FROM: VIgeredith Reckert, Senior Planner SUB,f1CT: Request for facilitation DATE: March 12, 2004 f.U4 4 Please let this correspondence serve as a follow-up to our conversation regarding the City's request for facilitation from your organization for a neighborhood meeting relating to a pending land use application in the City of Wheat Ridge. The Applewood Baptist Church is located at 11200 W. 32p° Avenue/ 11225 W. 32"" Avenue. The church campus is split by W. 32" a Avenue with the main sanctuary building on the south side of 32"d Avenue within the City of Lakewood and an education building with parking located on the north side of the street within the City of Wheat Ridge. The portion within the City of Wheat Ridge contains roughly 14.7 acres and is zoned R-1. Churches and associated accessory structures and uses are special uses within the R-1 zone district. The church intends on filing an application for approval of a special use permit to construct an additional education building and parking lot on the Wheat Ridge portion. A meeting for neighborhood input regarding the application was held on November 18, 2003 at the Applewood Baptist Church. Roughly 250 people attended the meeting. It is unclear what the breakdown between church proponents and opponents was, but both sides were well represented. Since that time, the neighborhood has formed an association to protest expansion by the church. Staff and the Wheat Ridge City Council representatives have been inundated with input, both in favor and against the proposal. On March 11, 2004, City staff met with representatives of the church to discuss having an additional neighborhood meeting. After a fair amount of discussion, the church agreed. City staff and church representatives concur that an impartial facilitator should be present, it should be held on neutral territory and that ground-rules are needed. We are hoping the meeting can occur within the next three weeks. I would be happy to meet with and/or provide additional background information at your convenience and can be reached at 303-235-2848. 1 will be out of the office the week of March 15. FACILITATION FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE C_ 4 e :X04t_0 Thank you for taking the time to evaluate and give us feedback on the facilitation services provided to you. By taking the time to respond and complete the questionnaire, you give us the opportunity to learn from you and to improve the quality of our services. 1. Have you ever been in a facilitated meeting before? Yes ~Q No If yes, # of times _ 21. Was the purpose of the meeting clearly covered at the start? X Yes [ ] No If no, please explain: 3 Was the meeting agenda reviewed at the start so that it was understandable? Yes [ ] No If no, please explain: 4 Were "ground rules" established at the start and managed by the facilitator(s) throughout. Yes [ ] No If no, please explain: 5 Were participants asked to state their expectations for this meeting at the start? [ ] Yes [ J No If no, please explain: 6 Was the role of the facilitator clearly explained at the start? )(Yes[] No If no, please explain: 7 Did the facilitators explain the meeting process to the group in such a way that you understood and felt free to ask questions? 0 Yes [ ] No If no, please explain: 8 Did the facilitator(s) seem comfortable with the meeting process and project confidence? M Yes [ ] No If no, please explain/describe 9 Did you feel the facilitator(s) was neutral throughout the meeting? O Yes[ ] No if no, please explain: 10 Did you feel "safe" to discuss your issues? [ ] Ye . [ ] No If no, what do you believe would have given you a greater sense of safety?b~~-/-~2 11. Did you feel your views were fairly listen to, and seriously considered by, most others in the meeting? [ ] Yes [ ] No If no, what do you believe stopped this from occurring? 7 12.. Did you feel that most participants were honest and open in stating their views in the meeting? At the beginning Yes [ ] No In the middle Yes [ ] No At the end Yes [ J No 13. As a result of the meeting, were important issues identified & discussed? )(Yes [ J No If no, please explain: 14. Did the meeting result in meaningful "next steps"? [ ] Yes. [ ] No If no, what do you believe should or could have occurred? l9u~f ~f 4& i R~nc A - - e 15. Was the facilitator(s) effective m helping the participants stay on track and focused? /z Avery effective [ ] Somewhat effective [ ] Not effective 16. How could the meeting have been more effective? ~ J n- . . , i s i4 .-s - . _ ! / e / _ "0<1 17. Was the time scheduled for the meeting [ ] too short just right 4bo long If not just right " wlia should have occurred? 18. Did participating in this meeting teach you anything you would like to convey to us? A Yes [ ] No If yes, please explain: p 19. 1~/ould you recomand to eone in a similar situation to have a facilitated meeting? Yes [ ] No 20. Overall, how satisfied were you with the meeting process? S^t T Very satisfied [ ] Somewhat satisfied [ ] somewhat dissatisfied [ ] Very dissatisfied Thanks a lotfor your time and assistance in completing this questionnaire! PLEASE FOLD AND TAPE CLOSED BEFORE MAILING kt/medfomis1fawvaUcdoc437 Rev 7/99 -1/2004 15:48 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL Figa T '.C. May 3, 2004 Via Telecopy (303-423-4840) David R. DiGiacomo 5400 Ward Road, Bldg. i[i, Suite 200 Arvada, CO 80002-1822 Re: Applewood Baptist Church Education Buildinr Dear Mr. DiGiacomo: PAGE 02106 iv l(:NAEL J. NORTON r,)jnorton@b fw-1 aw, com Thank you for your April 30, 2004, letter which has just been brought to my attention. Other than our brief telephone conference on April 15, I do not believe I have spoken to you about the above-captioned matter. Thus, all of our communications, since that date, have, in fact, been memorialized in writing, I will certainly honor your request that subsequent communications about this matter likewise be in writing. Regarding the substantive suggestions in your April 30 letter, we will respond to as many as possible in due course. To the extent you have other substantive suggestions, do not hesitate to write again, I J. Norton. Firm cc: Pastor Deardorff (with enclosure) (Ni - f csimile) Meredith Reckert (with enclosure) (via facsimile: 303-234-5924) RugNin FICA & WILL P.C. A770RNry: AT LAw 3400S. Fiddler. Green (:irdp. >uilo. 1():40 • Fn01awaod, ('0801 11 - F: 3027% 2626 - F: 303 796 277 - www blw law.com 05/03/2004 08:17 FAX 303 383 2294 SIRVA RELOCATION 0 002 I recently read a Baptist Press article written by Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, Calif. Warren listed 10 essentials in structuring a church for growth. I believe we have been implementing these essentials a Applewood for over four years. Warren's principles are as follows: 1. You must develop an unshakable conviction about growth. God wants His church to grow. And He doesn't want it to stop growing! 2. You taut change the primary role of the pastor from minister to leader. A leader equips others fi)r tninistn'. 3. You must organize around the gifts of your people. This allows the church to focus on ministry, not maintenance. 4- You must budget according to your purposes and priorities. The brulget shows the priorities and the direction of lk church 5. You must add staff on purpose. Anytime you add a staff member, that's a faith step and allows the church to grow to the nest level. 6 You must offer multiple services. To multiply, you have to offer multiple worship services. 7. You must create small groups. Structure your church so it won I become one big group that doesn't reach out to other people. 8. You must break through attendance barriers with big days. Days like Easter help the church to see itself as bigger and growing. 9. You must add seating and parking. Build as big as you can, with more than enough seating and more than enough parking. 10. You must evaluate your progress. Decide to track three or four significant numbers, such as attendance or small groups. Then compare the numbers of where you are now with where you've come from and where you want to be. As a body of Believers, let's keep looking ahead for the great things God has in store for Applewood. Blessings, Pastor Calvin 05/03/200408:18 FAA 303 383 2294 SIRVA RELOCATION IA003 May 2004 - Volume 4 - Number 5 @applewood LISPS 009-011 ,lished monthly by Applewood Baptist Church odical postage Paid at Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 POSTMASTER: send address changes to @applewood pplewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32nd Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-9989 ,capplewoodbaptist.com 303-232-9575 TOg&L5TAFF SUPPORT STAFF Arrington Calvin Wittman Amy Min Asst., Music & Worship for Pastor Mark Depetris ry Newman Asst Facilities manager sic & worship Pastor Chris Gaudreau fry Deardorff Food Service Coordinator mutive Pastor Kim Hilburn mes Wagstaff custodian ,ucation Pastor Marianne McCallum r. Bob Clark Receptionist ,,tor to Senior Adults Julie Parr avid Paschal Pastor's Assistant Holly Rippetue astor to Students Ministry Asst. Education en Zebel Faith Scears q, of Children's Ministries Min. Asst., ChildreniStudents Celly Wright Laura Schwartz )ir. of preschool Ministries Financial Administrator Anda Flentge Gary Sharp aih, of Member Ministries Facilities Manager John Rayburn Karen Sharp Director of Missions Receptionist Karen Winkelman Conununications Senior fldult Day Sunday, MY Z Lunch and program at 12:30 p.me in fellowship Hall Guest Speaker. Dr. Ron Clement, Colorado Baptist General Convention In concert... Charles Billingsley, xwith special guest Allen Asbury Sunday, May 16,7 p•m- 40 admission charge - t love offering will be received. Doors Will open at 6 p-m. Sorry, no child care applewood A BAPTIST CHURCH sunday Worship 8:00, 9:30 Er 11:00 a.m- sunday school Sundays at 9.30 Er 11:00 a.m. college Worship 8:30 P.M. on Wednesdays @applewood A Publication of Applewood Baptist church 11200 W. 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 periodical postage Paid at wheat Ridge033 DA-TED NMAT g Date PLEA, Mr, and Mrs. Pete Klantiner 3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 National Day of Prayer Community Welcome! M110NAL Thursday, May 6, All Day PRAYER Worship & Prayer Service at Noon Church-wide Prayer & Praise , 1 f n ' Sunday, May 2 7pm-8PM a l b e There wil d ~WeY of special calle business meeting following the prayer and praise service. Mi~Trips - 2004 Belarus July 5-19 $1,500 Taiwan July 14-26 $2,400 Kenya July 1.7-Aug. 2 $2,895 400 $3 Kenya August 12-28 ^-Sept 8 , $2,895 Asia 0qP AWANA Awards Night May 23,5:00 There will be a reception following the awards program. (Costs are approx`nnate) For details on any trip, or to express your interesh please contact John Rayburn, Director of Mi,','U` `s' at 303-232-9575.x44 05/03/2004 08:17 FAX 303 383 2294 SIRVA RELOCATION o N t", - e 23Y-5R-1-y ,tee. 4 m rv, fool 04/30/2004 10:28 3034234840 DIGIACOMO DAGGERS PAGE 02/04 DIGIACOMO & DAGGERS, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ASPEN BUSINESS PARK 5400 WARD ROAD, BLDG. Ill, SUITE 200 ARVADA, CO 80002-1822 (303)4204220 FAX (303) 423-4840 office@digiacomojaggers.com April 30, 2004 Michael J. Norton, Esq. Bums Figa & Will P.C. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle Suite 1030 Englewood, CO 80111 Re: Applewood Baptist Church Education Building Dear Mr. Norton: DAVID R. DiGIACOMO GERALD H. JAGGERS DOUGLAS J. PERKO Sent Via Facsimile Only Fax No. 303-796-2777 I prefer that all communication between you and me be in writing in the future since you have misrepresented my words to you in our phone conversation of April 15th. During the April 15th phone conversation I did not strenuously object to your efforts to discuss the Church's project with me. I did suggest alternatives that include meeting with members of the Church leadership involved in policy and planning related to this project. In our phone conversation I never mentioned the word "handle." In my follow up letter I did. I did not say I had no interest in meeting with you. I did express an interest in meeting with more people from the church than just you, and including more neighborhood people than just me. You invited me to a meeting at the Church. I would assume that you would have checked with the invited persons to see if they were available. My wife and I share one of the longest boundary lines with the Church and we are probably the most affected by the proposed structure and construction. Had you or your client really wanted our input a date could have been reviewed with us beforehand. I do not vehemently oppose any use by the Church of its property, and I have never expressed those words or sentiment to you or to anyone else. Perhaps you have me confused with someone else? I have never suggested that there is no compromise which will accommodate or eliminate any of my concerns. FAWPW[MD0CS0AVEWorton Ltr M App1ewood.wpd\4/30/04 04/30/2004 10:28 3034234840 DIGIACOMO JAGGERS PAGE 03/04 Page 2 April 30,2004 Michael J. Norton, Esq. Burns Figa & Will P.C. Regarding more of your other comments: 1. A traffic study does not address traffic concerns and impacts felt by those of us who live in the neighborhood. You can hire an expert to say anything you want about the traffic but the expert does not change our real world, and our concerns about safety on an already-busy thoroughfare. 2. The height and length of the proposed building will block a substantial portion of the evening light creating a large shadow. Your experts can do a computer simulation in minutes, no doubt. We need only to look westward an hour before sunset, as we did on Monday evening this week, to see that the sun would already have "set' behind your proposed building. If the sun is on one side of an object, a shadow is cast on the other. The larger the object, the larger the shadow. It's that simple. 3. I have the submission the Church gave to the City in 1984 when it built the existing building next to us. It clearly shows a much larger build out and sanctuary. To say the Church only now submitted a Master Plan recently at the request of the City is disingenuous at best and factually incorrect. 4. The Church's own submissions to the City in 1984 show the elevations and drainage patterns. No doubt your client has given you those. The vegetation on my property has been changed. since the building of the current building. Please consider that when you look at drainage patterns, it is also appropriate to look at the additional water that you add to the property by running a sprinkler system. 5. The WestNile virus is carried by mosquitoes. I referyou to the Colorado Department of Health. 6. Fences can be of various materials and still control access. The fence I have on my boundary with the Church is adequate and consistent with the look and feel of openness and open space. Additionally, the flood plain is a factor when you consider a solid fence. 7. The Church has had a fence on the east boundary of my property that was falling down in one section for approximately one year. It is in a location that is seen every time someone drives into the parking lot that is east of your education building. It was only recently fixed, but only after it actually fell down. Trash is frequently dumped in the parking lot and blows onto my property. Young people frequently park in the lot and carry on into late hours and squeal tires in the parking lot, sit in their cars in summertime at late hours listening to music, and in wintertime spin their cars in the snow and ice during storms. A larger lot will only encourage such FA"WIMDOC&DAVENonon Urre Applewood.wpdW30/04 04/30/2004 10:28 3034234840 DIGIACOMO JAGGERS PAGE 04/04 Page 3 April 30, 2004 Michael J. Norton, Esq. Bums Figa & Will P.C. behaviors. The Church can't seem to get its lighting right. The light spills over onto our property and has often been on late into the night. 8. I understand your letter to refuse disclosure of the interior plans for the building. 9. If the Church does not intend the facility to be used as a school during the week then they should have no problem making that commitment in writing. We also wouldn't want weddings and other large parties held in the proposed building. 10. The above list is not all inclusive and I have numerous other concerns. I addressed here the comments in your most recent letter. By way of giving you an example of other options available to the church, including selling their property, I was not seeking to represent a "client" at your meeting in his interest to purchase the property. Someone did approach me stating that he would be interested in developing the property as I stated in my letter. The fact that you excluded my wife and Mr. Sugar's wife is offensive to me and appears intentional. You have the names of the adjacent and neighborhood property owners. It is a simple matter to address your letters to the owners and not exclude any owner. Knowing I could not attend the meeting you still did not write my wife, Leeanne. I never "rejected" your invitation to attend your meeting. I told you I was out of town. You suggest that the meeting was to be facilitated. By whom? I think that you are aware of many more community members who are very interested in the church's proposal, and would like to give input and were not invited to your meeting. I can only guess at the reasons that you take a negative tone with me, both in your phone conversation with me and in your letters. You have demonstrated with your language and demeanor a clear reason for having an impartial facilitator or mediator involved in the church's discussions with the neighbors. I repeat here my request that the neighbors and church leadership engage in mediation. I've yet to learn from you why this option is not acceptable to the church. I will be out of town until May 5, and will not see any communication from you until then. Yours truly, 4wtzRbAlcd1J770 David R. DiGiacomo DRD/tdh cc: Meredith Reckert, City of Wheat Ridge (Via Fax Only: 303-235-2857) F:\WPWU,ADOCS\DAVEWoRon LV re Applewood.wpd\4/30/04 In Subject: ABC's Proposed Expansion To: <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Hello, Page I of I I am a member of the AFRV community group and was just able to see the minutes of the meeting from April 13th. It looks like some excellent issues were raised, however, one was not. Has anyone asked the church about their master plan? I know our community group has a copy of it. I feel like they are trying to sell the community one building, when, if fact, they will be expanding again in 10 years. If they are granted this special permit, what is to stop them from continuing to build? If they succeed with their master plan, their total space will grow by 300%1!! This is not acceptable in our neighborhood and they need to be asked this by the city council. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to write back. Thanks for reading! O Lisa Areliano UCNSC Ombuds Office Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 4/28/2004 Meeting Notes: Meeting called by Bill Norton Attorney for Applewood Baptist Church April 28, 2004 @ 7:00 p.m. Present at meeting Mike Norton (Consultant for Applewood Baptist Church) Dale Jones (Consultant for Applewood Baptist Church) Cindy Klammer (Neighbor) Louise Turner (Neighbor) Tom Radigan (Neighbor) Wil Sugai (Neighbor) ❑ Mr. Norton introduced himself to the group. Indicated that he is a former member of the church and has been retained as the church attorney. He has been asked by the church to meet with the neighbors. To convey what the church is about and what they are doing with regard to the proposed building. o Mr. Norton shared documents that he received including meeting notes from April 13, 2004 meeting sent by Ms. Reckert from the City of Wheat Ridge, a letter sent to Mr. Norton by Wil Suggai, and a list of topics created by Mr. Norton based on his notes of the April 13l meeting. Mr. Norton indicated that he thought he would use these documents as a discussion agenda. ❑ Mr. Norton made a clarification that both he and Mr. Jones were consultants for the church to see if they could dialog with the neighbors about the proposed educational building, wanting "meaningful, and reasonable compromises" on the areas of concern. o Having said that Mr. Norton stated that one topic that they were not willing or able to discuss is "why don't you move to another location." "This issue is off the table." Mrs. Klammer asked "in what way is it off the table?" Mr. Norton proceeded to give his definition of "reasonable area of compromise" as "what can we do with the proposed project to mitigate, not eliminate, but mitigate the concerns that existed. Anything we do will cause somebody some problem. ❑ Mr. Norton stated that if the approach of anyone at the meeting or anyone else involved in the process is "we are inalterablely opposed to this or any project, no matter how we might compromise that is just not something that is fair to discuss to bring about some sort of good faith result". ❑ Mr. Norton acknowledged that people from the community at this meeting do not represent anyone but their personal point of view. ❑ The subject of other meetings with other people was brought up. Mr. Norton indicated that one of the reasons he unilaterally and arbitrarily picked the people at the meeting and Mr. DiGiacomo "who told me he was not interested in attending" Mrs. Klammer indicated that he was out of town. Mr. Norton indicated that Mr. DiGiacomo indicated to him that " I have no interest in meeting with you at all under these circumstances." Mrs. Klammer indicated that he was looking for a mediator. Mr. Norton indicated that "he was looking for a different situation, what ever he is looking for it is not going to happen that way, we are happy to talk but it has to be a dialog it can't be do it my way or else." ❑ Mr. Norton: Are there other people that we should talk to? ❑ Mr. Norton: Opened the meeting to discussion from any of the lists distributed or any other topics that the community people would like to raise. ❑ Suggest we talk specific, minimize rhetoric, and constructive. ❑ Norton: To address Mr. Sugai's comment in letter of why are not meeting with church decision makers. Stated that it is his perception that there is an enormous emotional conflict between the neighbors and members of the church, and he is inserting himself as a "Kissinger" shuttle diplomacy guy of the meeting. ❑ Norton: Will take back to the church questions, comments and recommendations and will get back with answers perhaps at another meeting or two. ❑ Sugai: Pointed out that Mr. Norton is not unbiased in the situation because of his past affiliation with the church. ❑ Norton: I am also an attorney hired by the church. ❑ Norton: I see myself as a facilitator, I hear what you have to say, I filter what you have to say with respect to this project and we go from there. ❑ Sugai: Since Mr. Norton set some ground rules for the meeting, I would like to do the same. ❑ Meeting is recorded ❑ Sugai: Restated that the people that were at the meeting are speaking only for themselves, not for the neighborhood. ❑ Norton: Stated his understanding. ❑ Sugai: Indicated concern that there were people that are interested in this proposed building that were not invited to this meeting. Sheryl Mosbarger, Liane DiGiacomo, and Mr. Kiammer as examples. ❑ Norton: It is my experience that meetings with 4 or 5 people are more constructive.than meetings that are larger than that. If you want to give me names of people that you think we should invite to subsequent meetings (people that have additional comments that may be different than yours, I would be happy to consider that. It serves no good purpose to have three other people with the same view as you. ❑ Sugai: This is one of those issues that we need to agree to disagree. ❑ Tom: What is the time line for a next meeting? ❑ Norton: We don't have one, we see what happens tonight. ❑ Louise: Indicated that notification of this meeting was sent to the Klammers address. Need to straighten out. ❑ Norton: Apologies. ❑ Tom: if Wit gets you a list of names for next meeting. Will you have time before the application to the city is submitted? ❑ Norton: I think the answer is yes, but my role is to hear what you have to say and take it to the church and they make the final decision, I think the answer will be yes, that is the purpose of this meeting and another meeting or two. ❑ Sugai: Indicated that he felt that he did not have a choice but to attend. Either attend or you were part of a non-cooperative neighborhood, forfeit your right to say anything about this project. ❑ Norton: I can appreciate that. Location was chosen more for the business like setting. I had to get the ball rolling somehow. ❑ Sugai: I appreciate what you are doing is information gathering. That is basically what we are doing here as well. ❑ Sugai: Issue of Neutral Mediator, Location and agreed upon date and time. ❑ Norton: I think I can do it and keep the emotions under control. ❑ Sugai: This an issue that we agree to disagree ❑ Norton: That is exactly what I am willing to say from my perspective. ❑ Norton: Cost is a factor, aren't willing to spend money on extra things. ❑ Klammer: but not to spend $25 dollars for a neutral site. o Norton: The amount is not the issue, this an agree to disagree area. ❑ Sugai: Full disclosure of plans, Internal workings of the building so the neighbors understand what is the planned use. Issue is the masterplan. u Masterplan as Norton understands it is that the time of the first education building the City of Wheat Ridge required the Church to develop a master plan or what they wanted to do with the rest or the property. The church said we don't have a plan beyond the first education building. The masterplan was a city requirement to get approval for first education building. So somebody drew a master plan and it is just a concept. No one desires it, no intention of pursuing the plan, no one know what if anything will happen after (assuming we get approval) the education building. The education may or may not be the last building on this property. Then we will have to go through this process all over again. o Tom: Is that required when you make a submittal? o Norton: The truth is I don't know, I don't think so. Conceptual drawings that what the church has now is all that is required. The church has in mind conceptually the number of classrooms that will fit into the building. I think that it was discussed at the last meeting. Parking lot calcs, square feet, occupant load, all factors. I will try to get better information. o Tom: I was just wondering how the city could make an effective decision without knowing what the interior design of the space was. ❑ Jones: Questioned Sugai about the difference between classrooms and gymnasium. o Sugai: Noise level, and time of use and associated traffic patterns. o Tom: The deffiency of the traffic study is it only looked at 20% increment of the traffic. Traffic study based on the worship hall, and it is not changing so in reality the church does no have to do a traffic study but in reality the traffic increment will be a hundred times greater than they are. ❑ Sugai: Questioned when the traffic study was done. Prior to the time when people started to park at Prospect Valley or after. If it was done it skews the study to show less traffic. a Louise: The simplest way to look at it is that if you provide 192 parking spaces there will be 192 more cars in the area. ❑ Discussion about drainage onto the DiGiacomo property from the church. u Louise: One of the concerns is that the last time the plan on the docket at that time was for a very large church in the area of the west parking lot. ❑ Norton: I think that was part of the master plan. o Louise: Then the only thing that we can count on is that we cannot count on anything that happens this time. ❑ Norton: There is no plan (no conceptual plan) beyond this education building. ❑ Tom: We go to expect that the church has vacant land that they will develop it o Norton: At this point in time there is no planned additional use for this property. o Klammer: Pastor Wittman said at least 7 times that we own the property and we will do what we want with it. ❑ Norton: there are sometimes different ways to say things. ❑ Sugai: Good faith efforts, discussion of existing lighting.... Either shut lights out at night or install down cast light to eliminate existing lighting that gets off sight. Li Norton: Have it on the list, I think that is doable. Maybe something we can compromise on. o Sugai: Has anyone discussed interior renovation of the existing education building. It would be a lot more cost effective and less heartburn for the neighborhood. Good economic move. ❑ Norton: Might be a good economic move but it might not meet the needs of the church. ❑ Sugai: In my opinion, the existing building does not fit the architectural context of the area. In building the second building exactly the same you will have basically doubled the size of something that already does not fit. Most designers would look at the surrounding area and work with the existing texture of the surrounding area. This building does not fit the texture of the neighborhood. In my opinion:to repeat this design as proposed is to repeat a mistake. ❑ Norton: This is a very difficult area for any potential compromise. ❑ Klammer: This does not address the concern of the people crossing 32"d ❑ Klammer: Big problem is that the church is divided by a major street, it is dangerous. ❑ Sugai: Vertical measurement of the building is a sticking point. To the letter of the ordinance it is legal but playing games to get a taller building, although legal is not the way to have a relationship with your neighbors. I think that the first educational building was built that way and have no doubt that the proposed building is going to do the same. ❑ Norton: the building is identical ❑ Sugai: The slope is to the north and if the floor levels are matching you will have a taller building. ❑ Norton: I understand what you are saying. That assumes we will build to match the existing ground level. That is what I heard. So it is really a height issue of current design. ❑ Louise: No where in the documents show the square footage of existing pavement, Only on the north side of 32nd. Percentage of coverage is pavement and percentage of coverage of pavement planned in relation to the property. Distance between northern edge of pavement and the northern edge of the property as proposed, and distance from existing pavement to the northern property line. ❑ Louise: Protection for the wild life. Concern from statement at earlier meeting stating that when we build the wild life goes. Be good to protect especially since it is flood plain which should not be built in anyway. ❑ No one from the northern properties has contributed to pavement and run off, because they are all flood plain property. ❑ The church is not flood plain property and it contributes to the flood plain run off, and the properties to the north compensate for the massive amount of pavement on church property. ❑ There was a motion passed by the city council in the 70's that there will be no paving on the church property until the Lena gulch improvements had passed the point of the water intake. ❑ Since that time there has been two major paving projects on the church property. ❑ How was this done? How could it be approved with no detention pond? ❑ Gulch improvement was to be done by the Urban Drainage District. This is a major project because of the magnitude of water Lena Gulch has to carry in a flood situation. ❑ The Gulch work has not reached this area, but the paving was done.- The ordinances dictating a detention pond was in effect at that time but ignored. ❑ Discuss what can be done to keep as much of the northern area of the church property to remain in a natural state. Apparently, there is no consideration of keeping a portion of the property in a natural state. ❑ In the first city Comprehensive Park Plan, portions of the northern part of the church property, Lena Gulch, and portions of the properties north of Lena Gulch was designated as "Open Space for Ecology." Worked as being in private ownership but held as "Open Space for Ecology" but the church apparently has not heard of this. Belief is that it is still on the plans. ❑ History of R-1 definition: Used to be 20% built on 80% open, now it is 80% built on with 20% open. (1 year ago). There should be enough landscaping to mitigate the impact of the church. Designate are area on the north portion of the property as remaining in a natural state that cannot be developed. ❑ History_Churches as a "special use" for permitting. Says that the Planners see that there are a number of larger projects that were beginning to exceed the intent of fitting in with residential use. That there is a capacity that should not be exceeded and still be compatible with residential use. ❑ In last Comprehensive Plan this are was designated as "Agricultural Estates" which means one unit per acre. Which suggests that the planners saw that the capacity for intense use had reached its limits. This property was specifically included in the designation. Thinking may have been that the present use is not compatible with residential use. ❑ Norton indicated that Open space on the north side of the property is important to the neighbors to the north. (did not acknowledge the comprehensive plan) ❑ Indication was that the city had no intention of extending the Lena Gulch improvement project further than its present situation. ❑ Every bit of paving adds to flooding potential. ❑ TOM did not want to be Unctuous. Wants church to go along and not listen to the neighbors and continue attempting to force things through, because perhaps through not listening to the neighbors and with the accompanying public outcry perhaps the city council will realize that this is not what the community wants and reject it. ❑ It is obvious that we are looking at a "MegaChurch" concept. ❑ Lights: Since church is used primarily during the day, why do you have to have them on all the time instead of activated with activity? ❑ Traffic flow study has to be done at a reasonable level. The question is done at the level of just the extension of the proposed education building or does it take in consideration that there going to be a worship center on the Westside of the property? The church is already at capacity, there has to be another worship center. The logical conclusion is that you build the worship center after you build the educational center because you don't have to do a traffic study for the education center, then it will be less difficult to get the worship center through. "There is a master plan that will be implemented" ❑ The traffic study does not take into consideration the true traffic flow because it is not mandated by city regulations because they have not changed the size of the worship center, which eventually the church will. The true traffic flow will be 100% or more not the 20% represented by the traffic study. ❑ Drainage: metered flow at historic flow ❑ Cindy: don't understand why the church has to build. ❑ Why does the church need to build a new 3.2 million dollar facility when it is not at capacity except for 2 sessions. ❑ Difficulty in understanding how any congregation can approve 3 million dollars for something that is so unused. (It is used on Sundays, and Wednesdays, and special occasions such as Easter, and Christmas etc. Mr. Norton's belief is Sundays and Wednesdays are the primary days of use but will verify.) ("goes back to it is our property..." ❑ Use of new facility is so limited, are you seriously not considering a more productive use for this under utilized space? Perhaps a lease situation to a coincide Norton's understanding is if this is the case the whole process must begin from the start as a special use permit application) ❑ Cindy recommended a space planner and a time management planner to make more efficient us of space already existing. ❑ Questioned that there has to be bigger plans than to spend 3.2 million dollars for another building when the existing building is so under used. ❑ Economics: Cost savings of remodel vs. new include not only the cost of building but also upkeep and utility costs. (Norton acknowledged his understanding of argument...." lets move on". ❑ Although, not on the table... Cindy recommended that the church sell the property and move to a location that is more appropriate . ❑ Norton: Some one suggested that change the alignment of the foot print of the building instead of a north south orientation angle it more east west. (Tom: if you do that it would be more difficult to develop the rest of the land. That would give us comfort that the rest of the property could not be developed.) ❑ Norton: someone asked about the amount of fill dirt would be imported onto the site. Has to do with the height of the building. Acknowledge that there is quiet a drop at the end of the building. Indicated that he would get answer for next meeting. ❑ Norton: It is his understanding that there is no plan for a charter school (public or private) now or in the future. Again, special use permit requirement will be required. ❑ Where do we go from here:_1. Invite other people to follow up meetings. 2. Norton asked for help in contacting people to coordinate date and time for meeting. 3. Does not want to go over same issues. 4. The second meeting should be the place to address whatever changes the church is willing to make. 5. What else is out there? 6. Can meet Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday ❑ 7. Answers at next meeting if possible 04 2Y2004 13:28 7204933180 Via Telecopy (303-423-4840) David R. DiGiacomo 5400 Ward Road, Bldg. 111, Suite 200 Arvada, CO 80002-1822 BURNS FIGA & WILL April 28, 2004 Re: Applewood Banti d Church Education Building Dear Mr, DiGiacomo: PAGE 02105 VC.HAEL J. NORTON ml nor [On Wb fw-law com Thank you for your April 27, 2004, letter which has just been brought to my attention. Regarding the selection of the date for the April 28, 2004, facilitation meeting, as you may recall, during our brief telephone conference on April 15, 2004, when I called to inquire about your interest, as one of the "spokespersons" during the April 13, 2004, Neighborhood Meeting in further meetings, you strenuously objected to my efforts to discuss the Church's project with you, advised me that you thought I was trying to "handle" you, and told me you had no interest in attending such a meeting. Since that telephone conference,I received and responded to your letter to me dated April 16, 2004. Since you declined to participate in this next facilitation meeting, it did not occur to me that I should coordinate a date for a meeting that you would not participate in with you. Likewise, 1. do not believe it appropriate for you to either dictate the format and process of this further facilitation meeting or to seek to represent a client who may wish to purchase the Church's property as an aspect of your objection to the Church's development plans. It is our intention to talk to those who have accepted our invitation to meet tonight to find out specific concerns and then determine whether we are able to accommodate those concerns in any manner. In this regard, we anticipate that at least one additional facilitation meeting will be required to properly respond to the legitimate proposals we expect to be forthcoming at tonight's meeting. Frankly, a response that is not appropriate is one which vehemently opposes any use by the Church of its property. That appears to me to be the underlying motivation of most, if not all. of your comments in your letters. As I said in my letter to you and others in inviting you to this facilitation meeting, if your position is that no compromise by the Church will accommodate or ameliorate your specific concerns and you will remain opposed to any proposal the Church may submit to the City of Wheat .Ridge, no useful purpose will be served by your attendance at such a facilitation meeting or for that matter in even dialoguing with you. BURNS FICA & WII.l. P.C. ATTOPNrry, AT LAI 64UU S; Fiddlor'~ Gmnn Clrt;J, Eiuilr, 10.90 • ❑ iylrewnod. 00 Sol IT • F, 30:1796 2678 • F• 30'+ 79C 277 ).C 7 • t .b(w-IFW.MiTI 04/2:':12004 13:28 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 03/05 April 28, 2004 Page 2 However, assuming that you are, in fact, willing to "agree to consent to. [a] plan or configuration of buildings" the Church may propose to the City of Wheat Ridge as you state in paragraph 12 of your letter, to the extent that I am able to address the specific additional concerns you raise in the balance of your April 27, 2004, letter, I do so as follows: 1. Your comments regarding traffic impact are being addressed by Fred Lantz of Lantz Associates, Arvada, CO. You were provided with a copy of the Lantz Associates' Traffic Impact Study_ If you have specific comments about that study, please provide them to me at your early convenience. 2. Regarding your design comments, if you ltave any evidence that "[l]ight and weather patterns will be affected by the size of the building," please provide it to us. We will consider the balance of your design-related comments in paragraphs 2 and 4 of your letter, as we determine economically and technically feasible as we consider our next step in this process. 1 Regarding your assertion "that the Church intends something much larger on the rest of the site," we can only repeat what we have told you and others before, i_ e., there are no plans or intentions for any other use of the site at this time other than the proposed Education Building. The so-called Master Plan was developed by the Church some years ago at the request of representatives of the City of Wheat Ridge to show how the property may, in the future, be utilized. As I understand it, even at the time the so-called Master Plan was developed and submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge (I emphasize at the request of representatives of the City Of Wheat Ridge), it did not constitute the then-existing plans or intentions of the Church. In any event, as has been made clear during the process relating to the Education Building, we understand that the Church is obligated to follow the City of Wheat Ridge Special Use Permit Process, as it may be amended from time to time, in seeking any further or additional use of its property, If you have information to the contrary, please provide it to me at your early convenience. 4. Regarding the drainage-rclated comments in paragraphs 6 and 8 of your letter, we will be please to review the "drawings from years ago showing a different pattern of historical flow" you indicate you have to see how, if at all, the proposed development of the Education Building affects your property. If you have any scientific data supporting your contention that the proposed detention pond will, in fact, "increase the potential for West Nile Virus breeding grounds," please provide it to me at your early convenience. While a fence, which you also object to in paragraph 7 of your letter would minimize the possibility that anyone will "wander" into this detention pond area, it is my understanding that this detention pond will serve only as an overflow area in the event of heavy rains and will not retain water as if it were a lake. I will discuss this aspect with the design team, however, and contact you with further information if I am incorrect in my understanding. Concerning your assertion in paragraph 7 of your letter that the 04/2~'/2004 13:28 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 04105 April 28, 2004 Page 3 Church has not demonstrated that it has responsibly maintained any of its property in the past, if you have specific evidence to this effect, please provide it to me at your early convenience. I assume your comment in paragraph 5 of your letter that you see "no effort to mitigate water quality issues" is related to the drainage- related comments. As I understand it, the Church is now and will continue to be on municipal water and sewer supply. If you have something else in mind, let me know at your early convenience. Likewise, I will verify that my understanding that Church is on municipal water and sewer supply is correct. Regarding the size and use of the proposed Education Building as raised generally in paragraphs 9, 10, and 11 of your letter, most of your comments are matters relating to Church administration. However, as I understand it, there is absolutely no plan to use the proposed Education Building for non-Church-related uses, including for a new or existing school facility, other than those uses which the Church advised about during the Neighborhood Meeting, e.g., community service site for Jefferson County, election polling place, emergency evacuation site for Prospect Valley Elementary School, etc. Even if there were some clandestine plan to use the proposed Education Building for non-Church-related uses (which there is not), including for a new or existing school facility, as has been made clear during the process relating to the Education Building, we understand that the Church would be obligated to follow the City of Wheat Ridge Special Use Permit Process, as it may be amended from time to time, to obtain approval for any such use of its property. If you have information to the contrary, please provide it to me at your early convenience. The balance of your comments are simply unfounded and do not merit serious consideration or response. As I attempted to discuss with you on April 15 and as .I advised you in my letter of April 16, the people who were invited to this April 28 facilitation meeting were selected because their comments seemed, at least tome, to be representative of general concerns expressed by others in the neighborhood. However, such a large group as that in attendance at the April 13 Neighborhood Meeting did not seem to me to enable constructive and specific discussions as the Church hopes will occur tonight. Since you apparently know who has been. invited to this meeting, you must also know that 50 percent of the invitees who have accepted the Church's invitation are women. Your suggestions that women are being excluded from the process is absurd. While we regret that you rejected our invitation to attend tonight's facilitation meeting and therefore will not be in attendance, I will keep you and the other neighbors who attended the April 13 Neighborhood Meeting informed of progress and results from this facilitation meeting and of any subsequent facilitation meetings, if any. In this regard, if we do have a subsequent facilitation meeting, we will be pleased to consider any new and different topics you may wish to raise at that time. 04/28/2004 13:28 April 28, 2004 Page 4 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 05/05 As always, if you have further questions or comments, do not hesitate to communicate with me. Sincerely, I J. Norton Firm cc: Pastor Deardorff (via facsimile) Meredith Reckert (via facsimile: 303-234-5924) DIGIACOMO & JAGGERS, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ASPEN BUSINESS PARK 5400 WARD ROAD, BLDG. III, SUITE 200 ARVADA, CO 80002-1822 (303)420-4220 FAX (303) 423-4840 office@digiacomoiaggers.com April 27, 2004 DAVID R. DiGIACOMO GERALD H. JAGGERS DOUGLAS J. PERKO I PV Via Facsimile Transmission 303-796-2777 Michael J. Norton Burns Figa & Will, P.C. 6400 S. Fiddlers Green Cir, Ste 1030 Englewood, CO 80111 RE: Applewood Baptist Church Dear Mr. Norton: fm~ I had planned for some time to be out of town on the date you picked for a meeting. You did not try to schedule a mutually agreeable date and your unilateral setting is contrary to the courtesy I would expect as a fellow practicing attorney. Perhaps another date could be negotiated. You have implicitly rejected my suggestions for a mediated session without a direct response to my invitation. I believe that a mediated session would allow us to do our best work. Out of the collective thoughts of many people it is likely that the most creative solutions would evolve. The refusal to mediate indicates to me a refusal to truly consider the needs and interests of the neighborhood. I believe that in mediation we could explore the Church's relocation among other possibilities. For example, if the Church could relocate to I-70 and Hwy 58 near the mall under consideration, it would have a site much more conducive to its mission. The Church could sell the 32" Avenue property for a substantial sum and avoid spending $3.2 Million on a new building. Perhaps $6-8 Million would be available for a new campus. A win/win could be created for the Church and the community. I have been contacted by a developer who would be interested in purchasing the Church's property for low density residential development; development consistent with the current zoning. I have other concerns: I see no way to mitigate the traffic issue; 2. The building design is not consistent with any of the neighborhood. The existing FAWPWDACH=ts\DiGiacomo, Dave\city mattednorton. 11h.wpd\4/27/04 Page 2 April 27, 2004 Michael I Norton and new building at 3 stories and approximately 50' at the North end (from existing ground elevations) is taller than any Wheat Ridge building, except those on much busier thoroughfares and certainly taller and larger than any buildings in residential neighborhoods. A building of the proposed height is an assault on the neighborhood destroying the views and turning the look of the neighborhood into a commercial or office zone. Light and weather patterns will be affected by the size of the building. 3. The proposed location of the building tells me and others that the Church intends something much larger on the rest of the site. Otherwise, the building could be located closer to 32°d Avenue. 4. There is no reason that I have been given for a 3 story building. Two stories is much more consistent with the neighborhood. 5. I see no effort to mitigate water quality issues. 6. The proposed drainage onto my property is not acceptable and is not traditional. I have drawings from years ago showing a different pattern of historical flow. A 6' fence is not acceptable and further destroys the sense of openness. A 6' fence would require more attention and maintenance than the church has demonstrated in the past. The open ponds and the standing water increase the potential for West Nile Virus breeding grounds, along with the chances for injury or death to children who may try to wade into the water (for a lost ball, crawdad hunting, etc.) or a walk on ice. 9. The new education wing is unnecessary by the Church's own admission. $3.2 Million could be saved by changing Sunday School times. 10. No one has shown us the interior plan, but I have heard there is a plan for a large open-2 story room which indicates a gymnasium for a school and an expansion of the current use. Please share the interior plan with the neighborhood. 11. Until the Church agrees that it will not use the new or existing facility as a school during the week, I will not agree to consent to any plan or configuration of buildings. 12. I have other ideas which I am happy to share at a facilitated meeting. F:\WPWIN\CGents\DiGiawmo, Dave\city matter\noROn.IItr.wpd\427/04 Page 3 April 27, 2004 Michael J. Norton My wife spoke at the November meeting at the Church, specifically requesting a dialogue regarding architectural planning and was not invited to the meeting nor was Ms. Sheryl Mosbarger. Ms Mosbarger had numerous thoughtful questions and comments. Your invitations addressed to the males of two households suggest that you do not intend to address the concerns of the women in our households. It seems that the church seeks to narrow the number of people who participate. As the Church is aware, there are many more neighbors and community members who have concerns and ideas than the small number of people who were invited to the your April 28tt' meeting. Your pool of invitees now seems to have been intentionally narrowed to suit your needs. You will remember that the Church refused to set the "neighborhood meeting" on a night other than caucus night eliminating numerous community members from participation. Now the pool of participants in your meetings is further reduced because you have hand picked the participants from the "neighborhood meeting." I am still willing to meet with members of the Church responsible for policy and planning decisions. I look forward to a meeting which will permit a free and open exchange of ideas. Please consider this letter as a second invitation to participate in mediation as described in my letter to you dated April 16, 2004. o s David R. DiGiacomo DRD/js cc: Meredith Reckert, City of Wheat Ridge/ FAWFWIIN\Cfients\DiGiacomo, Davekity matteAnorton. I1 r.wpd\4/27/04 April 26, 2004 Mr. Michael Norton Burns Figa & Will P.C. Attorneys at Law 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 1030 Englewood, CO 80111 Re: Applewood Baptist Church File No: 3251.01 Via Facsimile Transmission: 303-796-2777 Dear Mr. Norton: I will be attending the meeting that you requested in you April 16, 2004 letter. I do have a number of concerns that I would like you to address and record for the meeting on April 28th I need to make very clear that I am not speaking on behalf of the community and I am not a community representative. My opinions and statement are my own and I am willing to share them with the church. Frankly, I have not seen a compromising side to the church thus far, and I am looking forward to seeing if this is truly an effort by the church to get community input or a means to building a case. I am skeptical. I am concerned that you will be the only person from the church and that you have assumed the role of facilitator. Given the contentious history I would have thought that a neutral mediator would have been more productive. May I suggest that a series of meetings with a neutral mediator with chosen community and . church representatives at a neutral site would be more conducive to a constructive discussion. I would like to add as agenda items the following: 1. A discussion of Architectural Context. 2. A discussion of a series of meetings with appointed community and church representatives I am still formulating my thoughts and will likely come with more specific topics. Wil Sugai e-mail copy to: Meridith Reckert - City of Wheat Ridge In Page 1 of 2 Subject: Applewood Baptist Church To: <PKlammer@ACM.ort> Cc: "Duffy" <ddeardorff@applewoodbaptist.com>, <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Dear Mr. Klammer I have been given a copy of your email reportedly distributed April 21 to a group called "Applewood Families for Residential Values." Because your email evidences a number of apparent misunderstandings, I would like to try to set the record straight. It seems easiest to attempt to do this by looking at each paragraph of your email separately and commenting as appropriate. First, at the instruction of Pastor Wittman, I have scheduled a facilitation meeting for Wednesday, April 28, at 7 p.m. As may know, my April 16 letter indicates that there is a room available for this meeting at the Church. I also say in this letter that I would be pleased to meet in any other mutually acceptable location, including my office in the Tech Center, if the Church location was a concern to any one. The letter, though perhaps unnecessarily long, pretty much speaks for itself. As I assume you know, one such April 16 letter was sent to Mrs. Klammer. However, in the event it was not shared with you, I have attached a copy of this April 16 letter to Mrs. Klammer to this email. My intention, at the instruction of Pastor Wittman, was to accept the offer extended during the meeting by several who spoke to keep a constructive dialogue going - preferably with a smaller group than that which was present at the Church with the hope and intention that something positive and constructive could in fact be achieved. 1. Regarding your comments in the second paragraph of your email, I certainly did not intend for my April 16 letter to be a "badgering letter." To the extent that Mrs. Klammer or anyone else who received my April 16 letter was offended or felt badgered, I apologize. 2. Regarding your comments in the second paragraph of your email, I assume you are referring to Mr. DiGiacomo as he is the only "neighbor" I have personally talked to about this next step the Church's application process. Because I have had a previous professional relationship with Mr. DiGiacomo, I felt it appropriate to telephone him to discuss our hope that a smaller group of people would be willing, as Mr. DiGiacomo himself had expressed he was at the neighborhood meeting, to meet to start this process. As outlined in my April 16 letter, those invited to this smaller group meeting had each expressed somewhat different concerns about the project. As I understood it from Mr. DiGiacomo's comments during my rather brief telephone conference (probably no more that two or three minutes), after I briefly advised Mr. DiGiacomo that the Church wanted to pursue a constructive dialogue with some of the neighbors, Mr. DiGiacomo informed me that he was offended by my telephone call and that he thought I was trying to "handle" him. Mr. DiGiacomo told me, contrary to your belief that Mr. DiGiacomo suggested a "counter- proposal (neutral venue, etc.)", that he was not interested in attending such a facilitation meeting. On April 16, after my April 16 letter had been prepared and dispatched to Mrs. Klammer and others, I received a lengthy letter from Mr. DiGiacomo in which he essentially advised me that the only acceptable course of action to him was a detailed - and to the Church unduly costly and time-consuming - course of action. However, I do not recall stating to Mr. DiGiacomo that I "now had evidence that this neighbor (Mr. DiGiacomo) was refusing 'constructive dialogue."' That is frankly not for me to judge. It would also be my observation that it is highly unlikely that Mr. DiGiacomo would feel either badgered or intimidated by my call or April 16 letter (which he also received). 3. Regarding your additional comments in the second paragraph of your email, it is neither my desire or intention nor the Church's desire or intention to "splinter off the AFRV positions." As I indicated in my letter, the Church's hope is to see if there are areas of reasonable compromise. While this may take some time and may require more than one meeting (rather than the "last-chance meeting" you characterize it to be in the second paragraph of your email), as I advised Mr. DiGiacomo in my April 19 letter in response to his April 16 letter, if the position of any invitee is that no compromise by the Church will accommodate or ameliorate that invitee's specific concerns and the invitee will remain opposed to any proposal the Church may submit to the City of Wheat Ridge, no useful purpose will be served by that Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 4/23/2004 In invitee's attendance at the April 28 facilitation meeting. Page 2 of 2 I would be happy to discuss this letter with you further if you wish. However, in the interest of fairness, I ask that you forward my email to those on your "Applewood Families for Residential Values" email list with the note that I likewise will be happy, time permitting, to talk to any other neighbor about the Church's proposal and that neighbor's specific concerns. Thank you for your courtesy. Michael J. Norton Burns, Figa & Will, P.C. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle Suite 1030 Englewood, CO 80111 303-796-2626 (FAX) 303-796-2777 email: mjnorton@bfw-law.com x.: LTR Neighbor Klanuner (4-_1_6-04)doe Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 4/23/2004 Dut Page 1 of 2 To: alanw, ryoung Subject: Fwd: Reply from MHamilton (Consitutional Lawyer) re RLUIPA (Federal Law) Hi, guys- I received this email today which apparently was sent to Gretchen with a copy to me. I feel awkward and uncomfortable with folks from the neighborhood trying to the mayor and council legal advice. The neighbor who sent it is named Kristine Tomavich. She left me a voice mail saying that she wants me to call her to discuss the implications for our council. How would you like me to respond? Thanks- Meredith X-Originating-IP: [205.187.188.53] X-Original-From: "tomov258@netzero.net" <tomov258@netzero.net> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:11:05 GMT To: gretchen@ci.wheatridge.co.us Cc: meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us Subject: Reply from MHamilton (Consitutional Lawyer) re RLUIPA (Federal Law) X-Mailer: WebMail Version 2.0 From: tomov258@netzero.net X-ContentStamp: 2:3:3133450236 Hello Gretchen, Here is some information on that "Federal law" you spoke of Following is the response to me from Marci Hamilton, author of the article on recent court cases that involve RLUIPA. Christine Thanks for your email. Responses below: the council persons have waved that flag saying that churches can "pretty much do what they want to" because of a "Federal law". This is simply untrue. They need to read the recent decision in the 9th Circuit: San Jose Christian College v. Morgan Hill. Before RLUIPA applies, the church has the burden of proving land use laws impose a "substantial burden" on its religious exercise. The Morgan Hill case (which relies on the 7th Cir case in C.L.U.B. v. City of Chicago) sets a high standard (the right standard) and I don't see anything in the facts that you describe indicating the church can meet this standard. If it can't, RLUIPA is out of the picture altogether. The council should also be made to understand that if it gives to this church any special preference vis- a-vis the land use laws (i.e., a pass), it will have to do the same thing for every future request from any religious institution or religious homeowner operating services out of their home. In addition, residential neighborhoods in these situations are starting to sue the cities who favor the churches. The council needs to read RLUIPA narrowly in order to navigate the likelihood of being sued by the church or the neighbors. If they don't like the situation they are in, they should contact their reps in Congress.... who created this mess. The city council also needs to get better legal advice if their Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci,wheatridge.co.us> 4/21/2004 :Out Page 2 of 2 position is that they have to roll over. Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith(aci.wheatridge.co.us> 4/21/2004 In Page 1 of 1 To: <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: <perri@rmi.net> Subject: RE: Opposition to Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Meredith: I just wanted to follow-up our many conversations regarding the expansion plans of the Applewood Baptist Church. As you are well aware, I own all of the property that borders the west side of the Applewood Baptist Church property located on the north side of West 32nd Avenue in Wheat Ridge. I want to express my opposition to the church's current proposed expansion plans of adding an additional 28,000 square foot Education Building, plus another parking lot in their proposed Phase I plan and the future proposed Phase 11 of another worship center of 31,000 square feet, plus additional parking. This size and type of development truly belongs on a commercial street where other large churches/campuses, office buildings, retail buildings, etc. are developed and the streets and area have been planned to accommodate such large projects. Applewood Baptist Church currently has approximately 38,479 square feet of buildings with parking lots. Their Phase 1 and Phase II proposed expansion plans would bring their total square footage of buildings to approximately 97,479 sq. ft. A development of this size does not belong in the heart of a residential community such as Applewood. Appropriately sized neighborhood churches are a very important part our communities, but not a massive development such as proposed. No one would allow a office complex or retail complex of this size to be built in a residential community for obvious reasons. No matter how many reports are purchased to say this will not have a negative impact on this neighborhood, i.e. traffic pollution, noise pollution, air pollution, traffic congestion, quality and peaceful nature of the neighborhood, etc., Applewood Baptist Church is ignoring common sense and playing with numbers to fit their own agenda. A development of this size would change the quality of life in this neighborhood forever. This massive size development belongs in an appropriate location, not in the middle of Applewood. I strongly urge the planning department not to support this proposed expansion and think of the people who live in this residential neighborhood. Also, could you please advise as to who I need to write to when formal application is made by Applewood Baptist Church. What is the time frame, etc. Thank you, Ralph Perri 303-202-2238 perrivnni.net Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 4/19/2004 Page 1 of 2 To: "Sheryl Simmen" <parfet4@comcast.net> Cc: "Adelaide Davis" <addavis@du.edu>, "Anita Hessin" <whessina@cs.com>, "Ann-Marie Davies" <adavies@somervillepartners.com>, "Applewood Familes for Residential Values" <AFRV@bigfoot.com>, Subject: RE: Community Development proposed neighborhood input meeting Yes, the meeting was Tuesday night, Colorado Caucus night; the church fulfilled its legal requirement to mail to 600' radius, and declined to speak with us about wider notification. My only official notification arrived 6 days before the meeting. We decided the church had so manhandled the event for their publicity goals that our energies were better saved for the upcoming public hearing in city council. With all due respect for Meredith Reckert's valiant efforts to keep the meeting fair, this is what you can expect when they negotiate through their attorney. What kind of 'neighbor' does that? I hurriedly set up a video camera on a tripod and then dashed off to Kullerstrand for caucus, but my wife Cindy stayed, and even spoke. Attendance was sparse, maybe 35 church members and 15 neighbors. Dave DiGiacomo, Sheryl Mosbarger, Will Sugai, and Cindy peppered them with questions. Like, "your Powerpoint slide shows Sunday school attendance at 8, 9:30, and 11 AM as 0, 648, and 134, respectively, with capacity of 750. Since this new'education' building is for Sunday school, couldn't you double attendance and avoid $3.2 million and all the neighborhood disturbance just by getting your kids to those other two sessions?" Answer: "Well, we're traditional Baptists, and traditional Baptists prefer to go to Sunday school at 9:30." Not a transcripted quote, you understand, but that was the gist of it. We are making copies of the video tape right now, and the facilitator secured an agreement to exchange tapes with the one they made from their balcony sound booth. We also have copies of the handouts and powerpoint slides that we can share. We also expect to get an attendance list and summary report from the city. Until the application is filed, it's still not quasi-judicial, meaning you can still have private conversations with your council people. So get them on the phone, not just voice mail, while you can; politely explain, if you see it as unnecessary, unwanted, that you expect council to exercise its discretion to preserve residential status by denying the application. Find out if they have any reservations about denying, and let us know. As for property rights, ABC has the same, and no more, on RI as you or I have on RI: to build homes. The weather is getting nice enough, that maybe we can plan a "picnic meeting" to get together and discuss next steps. Do Sunday evenings work for any of you? Best hopes, file://C:\DOCUME-l\reckert\LOCALS-I\Temp\eud5l.htm 4/19/2004 Page 2 of 2 Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / MailtoPKlammer@ACM.org "Either Be Good, or Else Be Careful, but Do Have Fun! " -----Original Message----- From: Sheryl Simmen & Dan Ryan [niailto:parfet4@comcast.netj Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:53 PM To: pklammer@acm.org Subject: RE: Community Development proposed neighborhood input meeting i just realized that april 13 has come and gone, did i miss the meeting? if not, when is it? sheryl simmen -----Original Message----- I have just learned that Wheat Ridge and ABC have arrived at a schedule to hold a Neighborhood Input Meeting on April 13 in the Church. 1) This is Caucus night! We should not have to choose which one to attend. 2) This is less than two weeks notice! We need two weeks to prepare a mailout and get bulk mail delivery (which takes up to a week). 3) The location is unfair and intimidating; this issue deserves a neutral venue. The ABC Special Use Permit request is of such potential impact, virtually remaking a neighborhood overnight, that it deserves not to be rushed. Please call the city and your council representatives to protest this schedule: Pete Klammer / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@ACM.org Idealism may not win every contest, but that's not what I choose it for! file://C:\DOCUME-I\reckert\LOCALS-l\Temp\eud5l.htm 4/19/2004 In To: "Lela Rossi" <lrossi@us.ibm.com> Cc: "Applewood Familes for Residential Values" <AFRV@bigfoot.com> Subject: URGENT! Converse with Council while you still can! Lela Ross wrote: > My husband (Dean Rossi) and I were at the meeting on Tuesday. We both > believe that the church deliberately chose Tuesday night, caucus night, for > their meeting, fulfilling their legal requirement. I have spoken with > their "head" pastor and told him that we're going to sell our house and > move out of Applewood because we don't want to live in a "Faith Bible" > church campus area. > We both believe it's a done-deal and that Wheat Ridge is going to approve > whatever the church requests. Our only option is to leave. Dear Lela - I feel the same way: if Wheat Ridge Council proves so pliant and yielding, so indifferent and insensitive to neighbor's wishes, that they will overturn the RI zoning and abandon the Applewood residential neighborhood to multistory business buildings and acres of asphalt parking, then I'll plant a FOR SALE sign on our lot that night! But it's too early to be so pessimistic. The councilpeople are beginning to hear us, and after a head start by at-interest ABC letter-writers, they're beginning to realize our numbers and our potential clout. We ARE their voting constituency, after all! Please have a conversation or two with a city council person, voice-to-voice, not voicemail, while it is still NOT quasi-judicial and you still can. There's nothing to accuse them of, none of them to my knowledge has come out in favor of ABC's application. Just politely explain to them what you think, and if you feel the neighborhood would be better off with a simple "DENY" vote, ask them if they have a problem with that. Let us know what they say. Time is of the essence, since the application could be filed at any time now, silencing our dialogue with council members. First of all, our mayor. She is the leader of the council, can address them all, and could be a tiebreaker in a close call: Gretchen Cerveny (303)233-1506 - home (303)235-2800 - city hall Our two representatives from District III, who access their homes from 32nd Avenue: Page 1 of 2 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 4/19/2004 In Karen Adams (303)484-1503 - home (303)231-1391 - voice mail Mike Stites (303)423-8360 - home This District I representative with seniority has taken an active interest in the ABC issue in e-mail, phone, and actions: Jerry DiTullio (303) 237-4806 - home This freshman representative is actually a veteran of many years as City Clerk, so she knows the ropes, including knots and snags: Wanda Sang (303) 431-8390 - home We need the votes of the whole council, so Larry Schulz (303) 736-9182 Dean Gokey (303) 231-1396 - voice mail Lena Rotola (no number given) This representative has consistently declined to engage us in conversation, claiming the matter may already be "quasi-judicial"; we think otherwise, but let's don't aggravate her: Karen A. Berry (303) 231-1397 - voice mail (303) 423-8360 - home (303) 249-4570 - Cell Phone Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto_PKlammer@A.. C.M.org "Either Be Good, or Else Be Careful, but Do Have Fun! " -----Original Message----- From: Lela Rossi Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:04 AM To: pklammer@acm.org Subject: RE: Community Development proposed neighborhood input meeting Page 2 of 2 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 4/19/2004 04/20/2004 11:12 Figa T 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 02/03 M 10 IAEL J. NORTON MI norIogObfw-Iaw.com David R DiGiacomo 3275 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 April 19, 2004 Re: Applewood Baptlsl Church Fducation BuildinP Dear Mr. DiGia.como: I have now had the opportunity to more thoroughly review your letter to me dated April 16, 2004, While you can, should you choose, reject our invitation to participate in the April 28, 2004, follow-up meeting, it will be my goal, as my April 16 letter specified, to listen to any specific recommendations you may have and then, following this meeting, to later discuss such specific recommendations with the Church design team to determine whether the Church is willing and/or able to modify its current plans to accommodate these specific recommendations. Frankly, scheduling such a facilitation meeting presumes that you and those who have been invited to this meeting are not unalterably opposed to the Church pursuing an additional Education Building on its property, even though the conduct of such a meeting also presumes that the Church is willing to consider some mutually acceptable compromises to ameliorate concerns that have been expressed by you and others. To make it clear, if your position is that no compromise by the Church will accommodate or ameliorate your specific concerns and you will remain opposed to any proposal the Church may submit to the City of Wheat Ridge, no useful purpose will be served by your attendance at such a facilitation meeting. Thus, with the foregoing in mind, we renew our invitation to you to attend this April 28, 2004, facilitation meeting, As a courtesy, however, I would appreciate it if you would confirm to my Legal Assistant Tricia Byrne whether or not you will be in attendance at this meeting. I do not believe the other comments in your April 16, 2004, letter merit further comment. Moreover, hyperbole or demagoguery serve no useful purpose in efforts to resolve honest differences, BURNS Fan $ WILL P.C. ATTORNFYF ni LAW 6-100 g, Fddler's Green Circlr., .9i file 1030 • Englewood. CO 80111 • F'::403 796 2626 F' 303 7N5 2777 , w .pfw-law cam 04/20/2004 11:12 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 03/03 April 19, 2004 Page 3 Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, do not hesitate to contact me. cc: Pastor Deardorf Meredith Reckert (Via Facsimile: 303-234-5924) e4/19/2004 12:03 F Cindy Klammer 11256 W. 38°i Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 C. Re: Applewood Baplisr Church Our File No. 2269,00 Dear Ms. Klammer: BURNS FIGA & WILL April 16, 2004 PAGE 02/14 MICHAEL J. NORTON mjn ortonAbfw-law, com As you may recall, I represent Applewood Baptist Church in connection with its anticipated application to the City of Wheat Ridge for development of an educational facility to adjoin the existing facility on the north side of West 32nd Avenue. We appreciated the constructive comments which you and others made during the recent neighborhood meeting this last Tuesday, April 13, 2004. In response to those comments, Applewood Baptist Church believes it would be useful to continue the dialogue to see if there are ways we can accommodate our mutual interests in such areas or concerns as facility design and configuration, wildlife protection, and drainage impact. This list is not meant to be exhaustive; but rather is intended to be suggested of the major areas of concern raised during the April 13 neighborhood meeting. To that end, Pastor Wittman has asked me to serve as facilitator for a follow-up meeting with you to see if you can set forth specific recommendations which our design team could thereafter consider. My job will be to listen to your specific recommendations. Because of the probability that such comments will impact technical and economic aspects of the proposed project, we do not believe it will be possible to make on the spot decisions with regard to most such specific recommendations. Thus, as Pastor Wittman envisions this meeting, I would try to learn from you the specific design or project related recommendations you may wish to suggest for our consideration before we proceed to finalize the application to the City of Wheat Ridge. After this facilitation meeting and to the extent that decisions could not be made at the meeting, I would then discuss your specific recommendations with the Applewood Baptist Church design team to determine whether some or all of your specific recommendations are technically and/or economically feasible. I would then report back to you the Church's position on these matters before the application was finalized and submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge. 7204933180 BURNS FICA & WILL P.C. ATTOnICYS AT LAW 54u0 Fiddler'., Green Orrle, Suitc 1000 • Cn6lawpnq, CO 80111 • P: .9U3 796 2626 • L: IM i9fi 2777 • wmw.bfw-law.rnm @4/19/2004 12:03 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 03/14 April 16, 2004 Page 2 While we recognize that you are able to represent only your own views and not the views of other neighbors, we have invited you to participate in this meeting because you were one of the leading spokespersons at the April 13 neighborhood meeting and you made constructive comments which may give all the opportunity to discuss and decide upon areas of compromise. In addition, the area of concern to which you directed your comments was somewhat different than the area of concern raised by others at the April 13 neighborhood meeting who are being invited to this follow-up meeting, We have scheduled this meeting in Room 311 of the North Building (the existing Education facility) for Wednesday, April 28, 2004, to begin at 7:00 p.m. and to end at 8:30 p.m. With regard to the site of this next facilitation meeting, I understand some of those who attended the April 13 neighborhood meeting were concerned that the meeting was held in the Church facilities. If that continues to be a concern, I will be pleased to host the meeting at my office or at another mutually acceptable location, provided the location does not add additional cost or expense to the Church. In order for me and the Church to be ready for this next facilitation meeting and to make sure we use our time wisely and constructively, it would be extremely helpful if you would prepare your specific recommendations and, if you are willing, forward them to me in advance so that, if at all possible, I can develop a comprehensive agenda and, where possible, have substantive responses prepared for you. Even if you are not willing to share specific recommendations in advance, I encourage you to come prepared to make specific recommendations so we may then consider and respond to those specific recommendations. By way of example, rather than a general concern about the impact of the project on drainage in the area (which, in any event, must be designed to meet City of Wheat Ridge standards), specific recommendations about how you think drainage should be handled would be useful. Please let or my Legal Assistant Tricia Byrne know if you are able to make this meeting on Wednesday, April 28, If you are not able to attend and would prefer to have someone else attend in your place, please let me know that as well so we can determine whether to extend an invitation to another person who was present for the April 13 meeting and who appeared to have comments or concerns similar those which you expressed during the neighborhood meeting which will not be addressed by one of the other invitees. 04/19/2004 12:03 7204933100 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 04/14 April 16, 2004 Page 3 't'hank you for your consideration. If you have questions, do not hesitate to contact me, 1 I, Norton. Firm cc: Pastor Deardorf Meredith Reckert (Via Facsimile: 303-234-5924) M/19/2004 12:03 F Will Sugai 11158W . 33'd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 C. Re: Applewood Baptist Church Our File No. 2269.00 Dear Mr. Sugai: BURNS FIGA & WILL. April 16, 2004 PAGE 05/14 MICHAH J, NORTON mjnorton() bfw-Iiw.corr As you may recall, I represent Applewood Baptist Church in connection with its anticipated application to the City of Wheat Ridge for development of an educational facility to adjoin the existing facility on the north side of West 32nd Avenue. We appreciated the constructive comments which you and others made during the recent neighborhood meeting this last Tuesday, April 13, 2004, In response to those comments, Applewood Baptist Church believes it would be useful to continue the dialogue to see if there are ways we can accommodate our mutual interests in such areas or concerns as facility design and configuration, wildlife protection, and drainage impact. This list is not meant to be exhaustive; but rather is intended to be suggested of the major areas of concern raised during the April 13 neighborhood meeting. To that end, Pastor Wittman has asked me to serve as facilitator for a follow-up meeting with you to see if you can set forth specific recommendations which our design team could thereafter consider, My job will be to listen to your specific recommendations. Because of the probability that such comments will. impact technical and economic aspects of the proposed project, we do not believe it will be possible to make on the spot decisions with regard to most such specific recommendations. Thus, as Pastor Wittman envisions this meeting, I would try to learn from you the specific design or project related recommendations you may wish to suggest for our consideration before we proceed to finalize the application to the City of Wheat Ridge. After this facilitation meeting and to the extent that decisions could not be made at the meeting, I would then discuss your specific recommendations with the Applewood Baptist Church design team to determine whether some or all of your specific recommendations are technically and/or economically feasible. I would then report back to you the Church's position on these matters before the application was finalized and submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge. 7204933180 BURNS FIC-A 8 vvlll F.C. ATTOPNCY' AT I-A'N 64CO S. riJdlar's Gr. wi Circle.. uilo 1030 - Fnglnwoocl, G.7 H0111 - P. 303 796 vr?r, - F'. 303 7:d6 7777 • %m blw-law.r..om E4/19/2004 12:03 7204933180 BURNS FIGA 9, WILL PAGE 06/14 April 16, 2004 Page 2 While we recognize that you are able to represent only your own views and not the views of other neighbors, we have invited you to participate in this meeting because you were one of the leading spokespersons at the April 13 neighborhood meeting and you made constructive comments which may give all the opportunity to discuss and decide upon areas of compromise. In addition, the area of concern to which you directed your comments was somewhat different than the area of concern raised by others at the April 13 neighborhood meeting who are being invited to this follow-up meeting. We have scheduled this meeting in Room 311 of the North Building (the existing Education facility) for Wednesday, April 28, 2004, to begin. at 7:00 p.m. and to end at 8:30 p.m. With regard to the site of this next facilitation .meeting, I understand some of those who attended the April 13 neighborhood meeting were concerned that the meeting was held in the Church facilities. If that continues to be a concern, I will be pleased to host the meeting at my office or at another mutually acceptable location, provided the location does not add additional cost or expense to the Church. In order for me and the Church to be ready for this next facilitation meeting and to make sure we use our time wisely and constructively, it would be extremely helpful if you would prepare your specific recommendations and, if you are willing, forward them to me in advance so that, if at all possible, I can develop a comprehensive agenda and, where possible, have substantive responses prepared for you. Even if you are not willing to share specific recommendations in advance, I encourage you to come prepared to make specific recommendations so we may then consider and respond to those specific recommendations. By way of example, rather than a general concern about the impact of the project on drainage in the area (which, in any event, must be designed to meet City of Wheat Ridge standards), specific recommendations about how you think drainage should be handled would be useful. Please let or my Legal Assistant Tricia Byrne know if you are able to make this meeting on Wednesday, April 28. If you are not able to attend and would prefer to have someone else attend in your place, please let me know that as well so we can determine whether to extend an invitation to another person who was present for the April 13 meeting and who appeared to have comments or concerns similar those which you expressed during the neighborhood meeting which will not be addressed by one of the other invitees. 04/19/2004 12:03 7204933160 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 07/14 April 16, 2004 Page 3 Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, do not hesitate to contact me. I J. Norton Firm cc: Pastor Deardorf Meredith Reckert (Via Facsimile: 303-234-5924) 04/19/2004 12:03 F 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 08/14 MICHAFI J. NORTON min orIonOq)bfw-law,com David R. DiGiacomo 3275 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 April 16, 2004 Re: Applewood ftftsr Church Education BrtildinQ Dear Mr, DiGiacomo: As you may recall, I represent Applewood Baptist Church in connection with its anticipated application to the City of Wheat Ridge for development of an educational facility to adjoin the existing facility on the north side of West 32"d Avenue. We appreciated the constructive comments which you and others made during the recent neighborhood meeting this last Tuesday, April 13, 2004, Frankly, personal and ad hominem comments about one's background, experience, the fides of holding the meeting on a certain night or at a certain location, or your views of the motives of specific individuals such as are contained in your letter to me dated April 16, 2004, serve no useful purpose. Nevertheless, in response to those of your comments at the April 13 neighborhood meeting which were, in fact, constructive, Applewood Baptist Church believes it would be useful to continue the dialogue to see if there are ways we can accommodate our mutual interests in such areas or concerns as facility design and configuration, wildlife protection, and drainage impact. This list is not meant to be exhaustive; but rather is intended to be suggested of the major areas of concern raised during the April 13 neighborhood meeting. To that end, Pastor Wittman has asked me to serve as facilitator for a follow-up meeting with you to see if you can set forth specific recommendations which our design team could thereafter consider. My job will be to listen to your specific recommendations. Because of the probability that such comments will impact technical and economic aspects of the proposed project, we do not believe it will be possible to make on the spot decisions with regard to most such specific reco.mme.ndations. Thus, as pastor Wittman envisions this meeting, I would try to learn from you the specific design or project related recommendations you may wish to suggest for our consideration before we proceed to finalize the application to the City of Wheat Ridge. After this facilitation meeting and to the extent that decisions could not be made at the meeting, I would then discuss your specific recommendations with the Applewood Baptist Church design team to determine whether some or all of your specific recommendations are 6U11W 1-16n & WILL P.C. Al IOHNtY,'. nr _nw 6400 5. ricjriio ; (,rr:r: rl Gimle, 5Uilo 1030 - Fnrrjinw00C. CO H0111 • P~ 3037062(;7n; • F~ 303 706 2777 - w w.bfw-law.coln 04/19/2004 12:03 7204933160 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 09/14 April 16, 2004 Page 2 technically and/or economically feasible, I would then report back to you the Church's position on these matters before the application was finalized and submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge. While we recognize that you are able to represent only your own views and not the views of other neighbors, we have invited you to participate in this meeting because you were one of the leading spokespersons at the April 13 neighborhood meeting and, at least in part, you made constructive comments which may give all the opportunity to discuss and decide upon areas of compromise. In addition, the area of concern to which you directed your comments was somewhat different than the area of concern raised by others at the April 13 neighborhood meeting who are being invited to this follow-up meeting. We have scheduled this meeting in Room 311 of the North Building (the existing Education facility) for Wednesday, April 28, 2004, to begin at 7;00 p.m. and to end at 830 p.m. With regard to the site of this next facilitation meeting, I understand some of those who attended the April 13 neighborhood meeting were concerned that the meeting was held in the Church facilities. If that continues to be a concern, I will be pleased to bost the meeting at my office or at another mutually acceptable location, provided the location does not add additional cost or expense to the Church. In order for me and the Church to be ready for this next facilitation meeting and to make sure we use our time wisely and constructively, it would be extremely helpful if you would prepare your specific recommendations and,.if you are willing, forward them to me in advance so that, if at all possible, I can develop a comprehensive agenda and, where possible, have substantive responses prepared for you. Even if you are not willing to share specific recommendations in advance, I encourage you to come prepared to make specific recommendations so we may then consider and respond to those specific recommendations. By way of example, rather than a general concern about the impact of the project on drainage in the area (which, in any event, must be designed to meet City of Wheat Ridge standards), specific recommendations about how you think drainage should be handled would be useful. Please let or my Legal Assistant Tricia Byrne know if you are able to make this meeting on Wednesday, April 28, If you are not able to attend and would prefer to have someone else attend in your place, please let me know that as well so we can determine whether to extend an invitation to another person who was present for the April 13 meeting and who appeared to have comments or concerns similar those which you expressed during the neighborhood meeting which will not be addressed by one of the other invitees. 04/19/2004 12:03 7204933160 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 10/14 April 16, 2004 Page 3 Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, do not hesitate to contact me. l J. Norton Firm cc: Pastor Deardorf Meredith Reckert (Via Facsimile: 303-234-5924) 04/19/2004 12:03 7204933180 Burns Fxga! WHIRC Louise Turner 11256 W,38* Avenue Wheat .Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Applewood Banrisr Church Our File No. 2269.00 Dear Ms. Turner: BURNS FICA & WILL April 16, 2004 PAGE 11/14 MM-1A1:]- J. NoFTUN mjnorIonabfw-law.com As you may recall, I represent Applewood Baptist Church in connection with its anticipated application to the City of Wheat Ridge for development of an educational facility to adjoin the existing facility on the north side of West 32"d Avenue. We appreciated the constructive comments which you and others made during the recent neighborhood meeting this last Tuesday, April 13, 2004. In response to those comments, Applewood Baptist Church believes it would be useful to continue the dialogue to see if there are ways we can accommodate our mutual interests in such areas or concerns as facility design and configuration, wildlife protection, and drainage impact. This list is not meant to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be suggested of the major areas of concern raised during the April 13 neighborhood meeting, To that end, Pastor Wittman. has asked me to serve as facilitator for a follow-up meeting with you to see if you can set forth specific recommendations which our design team could thereafter consider. My job will be to listen to your specific recommendations. Because of the probability that such comments will impact technical and economic aspects of the proposed project, we do not believe it will be possible to make on the spot decisions with regard to most such specific recommendations. Thus, as Pastor Wittman envisions this meeting, I would try to learn from you the specific design or project related recommendations you may wish to suggest for our consideration before we proceed to finalize the application to the City of Wheat Ridge. After this facilitation meeting and to the extent that decisions could not be made at the meeting, 1. would then discuss your specific recommendations with the Applewood Baptist Church design team to determine whether some or all of your specific recommendations are technically and/or economically feasible. I would then report back to you the Church's position on these matters before the application was finalized and submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge. 191JRN3 FICA & WII I RC. AI IoeNevs AT LAW 6400 S. Fiddlrr Green Gin,le, : i iile 1030 - Fnglewood, CO 90111 • P. 303 796 2626 - F 303 796 2777 - w bw m-law.com 04/19/2004 12:03 7204933180 Burns Figa Wil1F.C Tom Radigan 10845 W. 3rd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Applewood Raptisl Church Our File No. 2269.00 Dear Mr. Radigan: BURNS FIGA & WILL April 16, 2004 PAGE 12/14 MICHAEL J. NORTON friincrton@bfw-lew.com As you may recall, I represent Applewood Baptist Church in connection with its anticipated application to the City of Wheat Ridge for development of an educational facility to adjoin the existing facility on the north side of West 32"' Avenue. We appreciated the constructive comments which you and others made during the recent neighborhood meeting this last Tuesday, April 13, 2004. In response to those comments, Applewood Baptist Church believes it would be useful to continue the dialogue to see if there are ways we can accommodate our mutual interests in such areas or concerns as facility design and configuration, wildlife protection, and drainage impact. This list is not meant to be exhaustive; but rather is intended to be suggested of the major areas of concern raised during the April 13 neighborhood meeting. To that end, Pastor Wittman has asked me to serve as facilitator for a follow-up meeting with you to see if you can set forth specific recommendations which our design team could thereafter consider. My job will be to listen to your specific recommendations. Because of the probability that such comments will impact technical and economic aspects of the proposed project, we do not believe it will be possible to make on the spot decisions with regard to most such specific recommendations. Thus, as Pastor Wittman envisions this meeting, I would try to learn from you the specific design or project related recommendations you may wish to suggest for our consideration before we proceed to finalize the application to the City of Wheat Ridge. After this facilitation meeting and to the extent that decisions could not be made at the meeting, I would then discuss your specific recommendations with the Applewood Baptist Church design team to determine whether some or all of your specific recommendations are technically and/or economically feasible. 1 would then report back to you the Church's position on these matters before the application wa_s finalized and submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge. BUMS F'1(;A & WILL P.C. AIIoHNEYS AT LAw 64W& ridc&rl Wm,%wI Circle, Suac 1030 • f-riglewood, CO FM 11'I - P 903 7% r^_626 • F: .101796 2777 • w )J'fw-hw,com 04/19/2004 12:03 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 13/14 April 16, 2004 Page 2 While we recognize that you are able to represent only your own views and not the views of other neighbors, we have invited you to participate in this meeting because you were one of the leading spokespersons at the April 13 neighborhood meeting and you made constructive comments which may give all the opportunity to discuss and decide upon areas of compromise, In addition, the area of concern to which you directed your comments was somewhat different than the area of concern raised by others at the April 13 neighborhood meeting who are being invited to this follow-up meeting. We have scheduled this meeting in Room 311 of the North Building (the existing Education facility).for Wednesday, April 28, 2004, to begin at 7:00 p.m. and to end at 8:30 p.m. With regard to the site of this next facilitation meeting, I understand some of those who attended the April 13 neighborhood meeting were concerned that the meeting was held in the Church facilities. If that continues to be a concern, I will be pleased to host the meeting at my office or at another mutually acceptable location, provided the location does not add additional cost or expense to the Church. In order for me and the Church to be ready for this next facilitation meeting and to make sure we use our time wisely and constructively, it would be extremely helpful if you would prepare your specific recommendations and, if you are willing, forward them to me in advance so that, if at all possible, I can develop a comprehensive agenda and, where possible, have substantive responses prepared for you. Even if you are not willing to share specific recommendations in advance, I encourage you to come prepared to make specific recommendations so we may then. consider and respond to those specific recommendations. By way of example, rather than a general concern about the impact of the project on drainage in the area (which, in any event, must be designed to meet City of Wheat Ridge standards), specific recommendations about how you think drainage should be handled would be useful. Please let or my Legal Assistant Tricia Byrne know if you are able to make this meeting on Wednesday, April 28, If you are not able to attend and would prefer to have someone else attend in your place, please let me know that as well so we can determine whether to extend an invitation to another person who was present for the April 13 meeting and who appeared to have comments or concerns similar those which you expressed during the neighborhood tn. eeting which will not be addressed by one of the other invitees- 04/19/2004 12:03 7204933180 BURNS FIGA & WILL PAGE 14/14 April 16, 2004 Page 3 Thank you for your consideration. If you .have questions, do not hesitate to contact me- I J. Norton Firm cc. Pastor Deardorf Meredith Reckert (Via Facsimile: 303-234-5924) DIGIACOMO & DAGGERS, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ASPEN BUSINESS PARK 5400 WARD ROAD, BLDG. III, SUITE 200 ARVADA, CO 80002-1822 (303)420-4220 FAX (303) 423-4840 office@dig i aco moja gg ers. com April 16, 2004 Michael J. Norton Burns Figa & Will, P.C. 6400 S. Fiddlers Green Cir, Ste 1030 Englewood, CO 80111 RE: Applewood Baptist Church Dear Mr. Norton: DAVID R. DiGIACOMO GERALD H. JAGGERS DOUGLAS J. PERKO re e9a~ll Via Facsimile Transmission 303-796-2777 I received a call from you yesterday morning at about 9:30 a.m. You said that Applewood Baptist Church indicated to you a desire to have a "constructive dialogue" regarding issues related to their building project. You then indicated that you could not have the meeting this week because you are in trial. You also said you would be the only one from the church at the meeting. I told you I was interested in meeting and I would like people from the church who are involved in the policy and planning process to also attend. You said "I am from the church". You told me you were giving me this opportunity to me and I was rejecting it. I am not rejecting a meeting. I very much want us to meet with the possibility in mind of finding ways to address as best we can all of the parties' interests. I feel as though your call was for two reasons: 1) An attempt to try to "handle" me; and 2) an attempt to represent to the City that you have tried to meet, but the "bad" neighbors have now refused your request to meet. I advised you that one of the reasons the Church has often gotten sideways with the neighborhood is because the Church always wants to do things its way. As a former U.S. Attorney, a very well connected Republican, and a skilled attorney, I am sure you are used to getting your way often enough and the Church probably feels fortunate to have a litigator such as you on the front line. The problems of today demand a different approach, one which is often difficult for those of us FAWPWIDACIients\DiGiacomo, Dave\city mattednorton.1tt.wpd\4/16/04 Page 2 April 16, 2004 Michael J. Norton trained in the old adversarial ways. Listening is in, bullying is out. I suggest the following: The Church will meet in mediation with a representative group from the community. We will balance the group so the Church and community are equally represented with perhaps 6 persons from each group attending. 2. Each side will agree to a set of ground rules which are mutually decided with the help of a facilitator. 3. Each side will commit to a reasonable number of meetings. Perhaps two to four with each being two to four hours long. 4. The level of interest and emotion requires a talented mediator. I suggest the Director of the Jefferson County Mediation Services, Mark Loye. I believe you know and trust Mark. I recommend a neutral meeting site such as Prospect Valley Elementary School. 6. Neither "side" would decide who will represent the other "side". Each side is free to choose its own representatives. We will accomplish the mediation within six weeks of April 15' and the Church will not submit its application to the City until the mediation is completed. I believe that the Church could greatly increase its chances of coming through this process with a good relationship with the community if the Church's leadership would open their minds to other possible designs. I do not speak in this letter for anyone other than myself and I have not spoken with the other community representatives before writing this. However, I will do my best to try to get people to the mediation table committed to a constructive dialogue. I believe the time will be well spent by all involved. FdWPWIN\Clients\DiGiacomo, Dave\city matter\norton.ltr.wpd\4/16/04 Page 3 April 16, 2004 Michael J. Norton I look forward to our continuing discussions. David R. DiGiacomo DRD/j s cc: Meredith Reckert, City of Wheat Ridge Mark Loye, Jefferson County Mediation Services F:\WPWIMClients\DiGiacomo, Dave\city matter\norton.lh.wpd\4/16/04 In Page 1 of 1 To: <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: <perri@rmi.net> Subject: RE: Opposition to Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Meredith: I just wanted to follow-up our many conversations regarding the expansion plans of the Applewood Baptist Church. As you are well aware, I own all of the property that borders the west side of the Applewood Baptist Church property located on the north side of West 32nd Avenue in Wheat Ridge. I want to express my opposition to the church's current proposed expansion plans of adding an additional 28,000 square foot Education Building, plus another parking lot in their proposed Phase I plan and the future proposed Phase II of another worship center of 31,000 square feet, plus additional parking. This size and type of development truly belongs on a commercial street where other large churches/campuses, office buildings, retail buildings, etc. are developed and the streets and area have been planned to accommodate such large projects. Applewood Baptist Church currently has approximately 38,479 square feet of buildings with parking lots. Their Phase I and Phase II proposed expansion plans would bring their total square footage of buildings to approximately 97,479 sq. ft. A development of this size does not belong in the heart of a residential community such as Applewood. Appropriately sized neighborhood churches are a very important part our communities, but not a massive development such as proposed. No one would allow a office complex or retail complex of this size to be built in a residential community for obvious reasons. No matter how many reports are purchased to say this will not have a negative impact on this neighborhood, i.e. traffic pollution, noise pollution, air pollution, traffic congestion, quality and peaceful nature of the neighborhood, etc., Applewood Baptist Church is ignoring common sense and playing with numbers to fit their own agenda. A development of this size would change the quality of life in this neighborhood forever. This massive size development belongs in an appropriate location, not in the middle of Applewood. I strongly urge the planning department not to support this proposed expansion and think of the people who live in this residential neighborhood. Also, could you please advise as to who I need to write to when formal application is made by Applewood Baptist Church. What is the time frame, etc. Thank you, Ralph Perri 303-202-2238 perri@rmi.net Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 4/14/2004 REVISED AGENDA Applewood Baptist Church Building Project Neighborhood Meeting Wheat Ridge, Colorado Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:30 p.m. - 9 p.m. 11200 W. 32nd Avenue AGENDA 1. Welcome, Introductions, Meeting Process -10 minutes II. Planning Department Presentation -10 minutes III. Church Building Project Highlights - 45 minutes IV. Neighborhood Concerns Identified & Detailed - 80 minutes Brainstorm Options V. Closing Comments - 5 minutes VI. Adjournment - 9:00 p.m. l~ co V CT 4~ N Z ~i Q o y N vj N ~ G - f ~ 4 l~ rQ I a Cl1 ~F z CD D o~ Q. CCD Cl) N c o r m r m m X D m z m G CD o D O . z Q 'a - 2 z U) Co w O M rt rt O n o p rn 1 14 m 0 z G~ 'V 00 --l1 cn A w 0 0 v d > y, ` N ~W bw Z D a C. CD N N 0 r m m .o m z rn ~ _ G7 N o D pp O ~ z a ~ _ w O ccn = m ~ o o --i m 0 ° 40h- ~ m m n s _ z G~ W O ~o oo J V V N O W L-1 Lk) w r11 W ~Aj 1 ~ ~ A w N \ ^ ~ J N ~FJ 4 e C n~ J o N_ t - P N w _ ~ c C Ic T -A N II i r m Ch m D z % z CD > N m c.-~ g w w 1 ~ ~ T V p M (,U o Q m _ lD 0- > O z 0 o - 2 Z W 0 = b o o Mm rq. 0 o ~ m 0 m J ON1 lNn A w N N O oo J G, A w N C J n o N LV it ~ ~ oo J rn to A w N ~ o ~ R ~ s ~ S N a s c rn r~ w c o \ Q t' J "V 0 0 a r- z CD ~l ~ z O. r cn S N N VU ~ 0 v = m V r m Cl) X z z m z m V _ 0 ~ z o C/) 3 W O m m ~ : r m :r Z Y+ ~p oo -1 c.n A w N J 0 w N 1 n y N w r F~ CD i A I\ 2 LfV Q/J r m \ v~ m l ~n - a CL z m D 1 N m _ r °Q O v C /11 m D tn CD * D W O z z o Q Z CA a) -0 ~ O m N v ~ 0 ~ rn m J ~ lNi~ A W N N ~ O ~o oo J G1 ~ A W N v ~ X13 l ' y f r " 4 y S t `J 7 9 3 U J F o q\ DO Z 0 I a w w ti w w ~ ~ r 0 09 N N i. r J O i c ii A w N N O W J O~ cn A W N . I 1 C A~ l'J S 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 3031235-2857 The City of Wheat Mdge Date: City Staff Present: Location of meeting: Property address: Property representatives present: Meeting Moderator: Existing Zoning: April 13, 2004 Meredith Reckert Applewood Baptist Church 11200 W. 32"a Avenue 11225 W. 32"d Avenue Duffy Deardorff (executive pastor) Calvin Whittman (senior pastor) Mike Norton (legal counsel) Jim Moorehead (architect) Gary Theander (civil design engineer) Jason Hand (landscape architect) Fred Lantz (traffic engineer) Loren Priest (lighting engineer) Katherine O'Reilly R-1, Residential-One Comprehensive Plan Designation: Front half: Single family detached residential not to exceed four dwelling units per acre Rear half: Agricultural/Estate Residential not to exceed one dwelling unit per acre Existing Use/Site Conditions: The property contains roughly 14 acres. There is an existing education building on the property with a building footprint of 8300 square feet, three stories in height with a basement. Other site improvements include three curb cuts, drives, landscaping, detention areas and parking for roughly 220 vehicles. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant intends on applying for a special use permit to allow the construction of an additional education building. The new structure will have a 11,300 square foot footprint with three stories of height. It will be similar in architecture and will be connected to the existing building. Parking for an additional 190 cars will be located to the north of the new building. Issues Discussed: • Does the Lakewood city council have any input? How will the City of Lakewood be involved in the process? As a referral agency, they will be given a formal referral including opportunity to review the traffic impact study. • There was discussion regarding the height of the existing and proposed structures. It was noted that both buildings have an average height of 35' based on the City's definition of "building height" which is measured from average finished grade, although some of the building walls exceed 35' in vertical height. • How much fill will be required to be placed on the property? 4'-6' How many yards of dirt will be needed? This figure has not yet been calculated. • How will drainage affect the property to the east? Where will drainage from new building pad and parking lot go? A drainage plan and report will be required with submission of the special use permit application. • What type of lighting is being proposed? It was noted that the existing site and structure lighting emits glare and bleeds over the property line onto the adjacent residential properties to the east. Is the activity lighting going to be different than security lighting? • Are there plans to use the building(s) for a charter school? Would there be another city review involving participation if a day school was planning on using the building(s)? Could there be a restriction placed on this approval that the property cannot be used as a public or private day school? • Further explanation was requested regarding the attendance breakdowns for Sunday church services and bible study classes. Why not add another bible study on Sunday morning? Could the existing building be used more efficiently in lieu of building a new education structure? • What is maximum building coverage allowed in the R-1 zone district? A maximum of 25% of R-1 zoned property can be covered with buildings. • What affect will there be on Lena Gulch and the wildlife habitat to the north? Would the church be willing to dedicate this area as open space? The increased amount of property covered by buildings and parking could negatively affect the Lena Gulch wildlife corridor. • Who will review the traffic impact analysis? How is it analyzed? The traffic impact analysis is reviewed by the city's traffic engineer using standardized traffic generation volumes based on use and size of the structure. • How is required parking calculated? • Can the neighbors review the technical documents? Yes, once an application is made, the technical documents submitted with the application are considered part of the public record. The file can be reviewed in the Community Development department in city hall. • Why isn't the design of the education building more residential in nature? Could the new structure be lower in height and oriented towards 32°d Avenue? It was noted that some of the parking directly west of the existing education building was required by the City of Lakewood to serve as overflow parking for the sanctuary on the south side of 32nd Avenue. Because of the agreement, this parking can't be displaced. The Wheat Ridge planning staff would like to see a copy of the agreement. PLANNING & PW Fax:3032352857 41< Tr-ansm i t Conf _ Re3port >k>k P.1 Apr 27 2004 09:35 I D.0.7 I C Check condition of remote Fax. ] C 3037962777 1 City of Wheat Ridge Fax Transmittal 7500 West 29th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Planning: (303)235-2846 Building: (303) 235-2855 Engineering: (303) 235-2867 FAX: (303) 235-2857 Web Site: www.ci.wftffltigae.co.us DATE ! 2 Name: A CO Organization: Fax: Phone: From: Division: Subject: # of Pages: ,J3 ^,t'~G - Planning Building 0 Engineering 7'7 Includin cover a e .3 Comments: Alan White From: Randy Young [ryoung@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:50 PM To: Alan White (E-mail) Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Church Meeting Alan, Please respond (you or Meredith) to Mr. John Hutchins (I think, even though the e-mail address is Terese Hutchins). Thank you, Randy -----Original Message----- From: Karen Berry [mailto:khberry26@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 10:35 AM To: ryoung@ci.wheatridge.co.us Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Church Meeting Randy: Please see the message below. I replied to Ms. Hutchins and said that someone from Community Development would contact her regarding her concerns. I assumed that you would be forwarding to Alan or Meredith. Thanks Karen Berry >From: "Teresa Hutchins" <jandthutchins@comcast.net> >To: <khberry26@hotmail.com> >Subject: Applewood Baptist Church. Meeting >Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 17:29:39 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from sccrmhcl3.comcast.net ([204.127.202.64]) by >mcl-f9.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sat, 3 Apr 2004 >16:29:38 -0800 >Received: from HutchOl (c-24-8-229-229.client.comcast.net[24. 8.229.229]) > by comcast.net (sccrmhcl3) with SMTP id ><20040404002938016003bcb2e>; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 00:29:38 +0000 >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jHjjW/2eaWgzgpu2B8M8JuX >Message-ID: <00ldOlc419db$ea72fObO$e5e5O818@Hutch0l> >X-MSMail-Priority: High >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 >Return-Path: jandthutchins@comcast.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2004 00:29:38.0919 (UTC) >FILETIME=[EA17FF70:O1C419DB] >Hi Karen: >It is my understanding that a Neighborhood Input Meeting regarding the >expansion of Applewood Baptist Church is scheduled for April 13th at >Applewood Baptist Church. Please consider rescheduling this meeting to a >different day and location. >-April 13th is caucus night - this scheduling conflict could impact >community participation >-This gives Applewood residents less than two weeks notice - this too could >impact community participation 1 >-The location is unfair and intimidating - this issue deserves a neutral >venue >The expansion of Applewood Baptist Church is an important issue that >deserves serious consideration and neighborhood input. Please help to >ensure the decision making process is fair. Thank you. _ >Sincerely, >John Hutchins >Applewood Knolls Resident since 1972 Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar - FREE! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200414ave/direct/Ol/ 2 GORSUCH KIRGIS 1.LP ATTORNEYS AT LAW TOWER 1, SUITE 1000 11515 ARAPAHOE STREET I DENVER, COLORADO 80202 4 TELEPHONE (303) 376-5000 € FACSIMILE (303) 376-5001 GERALD E. DAHL DIRECT DIAL (303) 376-5019 email: gdahl@gmsuch.com March 31, 2004 Michael J. Norton Burns Figa & Will PC Suite 1030 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle Englewood, CO 80111 Re: Applewood Baptist Church Dear Mr. Norton: Thank you for your letter of March 11. I enclose a form of easement that might be a starting point for a conservation easement on the Lena Gulch portion of the church property. Regarding the Easter weekend parking situation, the only procedure the City has in place is a Temporary Use permit under Code See. 26-115.D. However, that section requires a time frame for application, review and approval which would not produce a permit before Easter. Sincerely, GOR KIRGIS LLC W Gerald E. Dahl GED/wfc Enclosure GED\53027\470302.1 - -EXHIBIT C TO OPTION CCJRACT Conservation Easement CONSERVATION EASEMENT THIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT is entered into by and between Hiwan Ridge Development Co., a Colorado Corporation (Hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor"), and Mountain Area Land Trust, a Colorado non-profit corporation, and its assigns (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee"). WITNESS THAT: WHEREAS, Grantor retains an interest in certain real property situate in Jefferson County, Colorado, which is approximately 271 acres of the open space area of the property known as The Village at Soda Creek, described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "Easement Property"); and WHEREAS, the Easement Property possesses natural, scenic, open space and wildlife values (hereinafter "conservation values") of great importance to Grantor, the people of Jefferson County, and the people of Colorado; and WHEREAS, Grantor owns the Easement Property free and clear from all liens and encumbrances except as noted in title policy provided to grantee; and WHEREAS, in particular, the Easement Property has significant and unique natural scenic beauty which is enjoyed by the public; and WHEREAS, the Easement Property is adjacent to open space and recreational lands owned by Jefferson County and the City and County of Denver, and is a critical part of a large, scenic, open space and recreational area west of Colorado State Highway 74 and south of State Highway 103 in the Troublesome Creek drainage; and WHEREAS, the Easement Property is an important elk calving area and elk winter range as designated by the Colorado Division of Wildlife; and WHEREAS, Jefferson County has zoned the Easement Property as open space for the purpose of retaining the natural conditions of the site, and has indicated the property is suitable for acquisition as part of the County Open Space Program; and WHEREAS, the specific conservation values of the Easement Property are documented in an inventory of relevant features of the Easement Property, dated 199_, on file at the offices of the Grantee, and incorporated by this reference, which consists of reports, maps, photographs, and other documentation that the parties agree provide, collectively, an accurate representation of the Property at the time of this grant and which is intended to serve as an objective information baseline for monitoring compliance with the terms of this grant; and WHEREAS, the Grantor intends that the conservation values of the Easement Property be preserved and maintained by the continuation of land use patterns existing at the time of this grant, that do not significantly impair or interfere with those values; and 1 WHEREAS, Grantor further intends to convey to Grantee the right to preserve and protect the conservation values of the Property in perpetuity; and WHEREAS, Grantee is a publicly supported, tax-exempt nonprofit organization, qualified under Section 501(c)(3) and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, whose primary purpose is the preservation of land in order to protect and enhance the natural, scenic, historic, wildlife and recreational resources of Colorado's natural heritage; and WHEREAS, Grantee agrees by accepting this grant to honor the intentions of Grantor stated herein and to preserve and protect the conservation values of the Property; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions contained herein, and pursuant to the laws of the State of Colorado and in particular Section 38-30.5-101 et seq., Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, as amended, Grantor hereby grants and conveys to Grantee a conservation easement in perpetuity over the Easement Property of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth ("Easement"). 1. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Easement to assure that the Easement Property will be retained forever predominantly in its natural, scenic and open space ,condition and to prevent any use of the Easement Property that will significantly impair or interfere with the conservation values of the Easement Property. 2. Riehts of Grantee. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, the following rights are conveyed to Grantee by this Easement: (a) To preserve and protect the conservation values of the Property; (b) To enter upon the Easement Property at reasonable times in order to monitor Grantor's compliance with and otherwise enforce the terms of this Easement; provided that such entry shall be upon prior reasonable notice to Grantor, and Grantee shall not unreasonably interfere with Grantor's use and quiet enjoyment of thr Easement Property; and (c) To prevent any activity on or use of the Easement Property that is inconsistent with the purpose of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement Property that may be damaged by any inconsistent activity or use, pursuant to paragraph 6; and (d) A thirty-foot wide right-of-way across the property along the north side of Highway 103, said location to be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto prior to conveyance of this Easement. The purpose of the right-of-way will be for the construction, maintenance and operation of a trail for pedestrian, horse, and non- motorized vehicle use. Use of the right-of-way may be open to the general public, or otherwise restricted as deemed necessary and appropriate by Grantee. 3. Prohibited Uses and Practices. Any activity on or use of the Easement Property 2 inconsistent with the purpose of this Easement is prohibited. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are expressly prohibited: (a) Subdivision. The legal or de facto subdivision of the Easement Property for any purpose, except as may be required by law for the uses permitted in paragraph 2; (b) Commercial or industrial use. Any commercial or industrial use of or activity on the Easement Property other than those relating to agriculture, recreation, or home occupations as permitted under paragraph 4; (c) Structures. The placement or construction of any buildings, structures, or other improvements of any kind (including without limitation, fences, roads, and parking lots) other than the following: (1) The maintenance, renovation or replacement of existing agricultural, residential, and related buildings, structures and improvements in substantially their present location; provided that any renovation or replacement of an existing building, structure or improvement may not substantially alter its character or function or increase its present height, or the land surface it occupies, without prior written consent of the Grantee; (2) The maintenance or replacement of the perimeter fencing of the Easement Property, provided said fencing is of a nature and character similar to that currently in place, or is otherwise approved in writing by the Grantee; (3) The maintenance, repair or replacement of the existing ponds located on the Easement Property; (d) Surface Alteration. Any alteration of the surface of the land, including, without limitation, the excavation or removal of soil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, or sod, except as may be required in the course of any activity permitted herein; (e) Wetlands and Stream Buffer. The draining, filling, dredging, or diking of the wetland areas located on the Easement Property, including any enlargements thereof; (f) Timber Harvesting. The pruning, cutting down, or other destruction or removal of live trees except as necessary, in accordance with generally accepted forestry conservation practices, to control or prevent hazard, disease, or fire, or as otherwise designed to protect the conservation values of the Easement Property; (g) Waste Dumps. The dumping or other disposal of wastes, refuse, and debris on the Easement Property; (h) Utility Systems. The above-ground installation of new utility systems or 3 extensions of existing utility systems, including, without limitation, water, sewer, power, fuel, and communication lines and related facilities; (i) Signs and Billboards. The placement of any signs or billboards on the Easement Property, except to post the Easement Property to control unauthorized entry or use, and as may be appropriate to in protecting or enhancing the conservation and educational values of the Easement Property; (j) Mineral Development. The exploration for, or development and extraction of, minerals and hydrocarbons by any method. (k) Weed Control. Weed control shall be undertaken on the basis of the best management practices commonly used at the time of application. 4. Reserved Ri?hts. Grantor reserves to itself, and to its personal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, all rights accruing from their ownership of the Easement Property, including the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in all uses of the Easement Property that are not expressly prohibited herein and are not inconsistent with the purpose of this Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following rights are expressly reserved: (a) Grazing. To graze not more than twenty-five (25) cow/calf units, and not more than eight (8) horses on the Easement Property; and (b) Business Activity. To engage in any business that is conducted by, and in the home of, a person residing on the Easement Property; and (c) Recreational Uses. To engage in and permit others to engage in recreational uses of the Easement Property, including, without limitation, fishing that requires no surface alteration or other development of the land, provided however, that no hunting activity shall be permitted. 5. Additional Restriction. Grantor hereby restricts the use of the lands adjacent to the conservation easement lands expressly described as Parcel 2A of Exhibit A to the following: The placement or construction of one single-family residence and one barn, and related roads, utilities and associated structures; provided that the residence may not occupy more than 10,000 square feet of land surface area or exceed 35 feet in height without prior approval of Grantee, and that said residential development shall be limited as follows: 1. Building Location and Setbacks. The residence should be sited to take advantage of existing views and microclimatic conditions while respecting existing terrain, vegetation, and adjacent land uses. Disruption of existing conditions should be minimal. Where possible, all existing trees shall be preserved and existing drainage patterns shall be respected. 4 2. Grading and Drainage. All site improvements should be designed to minimize the extent of grading required. Techniques for doing this include "stepping" buildings down slopes, providing access across slopes instead of down them, and using low retaining walls where necessary. Where grading is necessary, cut and fill slopes should be kept to a maximum of 3:1, with steeper slopes permitted (if permitted by soils engineer) when excessive disturbance of ground would otherwise result. All graded slopes should be "rolled" back into existing slopes, so that, after revegetation, no sharp contrast exists between existing and disturbed slopes. All areas which are to be preserved (trees, shrubs, rock outcrops, etc.) shall be marked and protected throughout the construction period. No grading shall extend beyond existing lot lines. In addition to minimizing the extent of disturbed land, disruption to existing drainage courses should be minimal. Where disruption or realignment must occur, reconstruction should occur in a naturalized manner allowing water to percolate and flow in a non-destructive course. If culverts or other drainage facilities are required, they should be detailed such that contrast with the existing environment is minimized. 3. Erosion Control. During all site construction, techniques for controlling erosion within the site and onto other sites shall be used. Methods include sedimentation basins, filtration materials such as hay bales or permeable geotextiles, and slope stabilization fabrics or tackifiers. Proper revegetation shall begin as quickly as possible after soil disruption and should be well established within one year after disturbance. 4. Architectural Design. No mandatory architectural "style" is required for this development. However, it is the intent of these conditions to encourage residences which are harmonious with the existing natural environment, suggesting design solutions which reduce the apparent visual mass, incorporate materials, colors and textures which blend with the landscape, and develop proportions and details appropriate to the site. No bright white colors shall be used on building exteriors. 5. Building Height. In order to minimize the visual prominence of structures, no building or solar device shall exceed 35 feet in height, as measured from the lowest point of of the finish grade adjacent to the foundation of the building. Items such as chimneys, flues, roof vents, etc., shall not be included in such measurement. The owner should consider the qualities of the site, especially the visual and climatic exposure created by the combination of existing slopes, vegetation and orientation. Lower buildings are generally more appropriate on more exposed sites, while taller buildings can be incorporated into those sites which are less visible and/or more protected. 5 6. Roofs. The form of the roof and the materials used on it create a significant part of the visual impact of a building. Gable, hip, and shed roofs will be acceptable for residential construction. Materials selected should be of a texture and color that harmonizes with the environment. All extensions from the roof, such as chimneys, flues, roof vents, gutters, skylights, etc., should be carefully located and finished to complement other elements of the design. Unfinished and exposed metal detailing is prohibited. 7. Exterior Materials. All materials and finishes should be harmonious with the surrounding environment, with natural wood, stone, or stucco being acceptable. 8. Color. Exterior finishes shall be in subdued earth tones, although brighter accents, used judiciously, is permitted. 9. Foundation Walls. Foundation walls shall not be exposed, but shall be finished to blend with the other exterior materials. 10. AccessoryUtility and Solar Structures. Accessory buildings or facilities such as detached garages, gazebos, greenhouses, etc., shall adhere to the standards outlined for buildings and site planning. Mass and scale, as well as forms, materials, and other detailing should be well coordinated with the main structure on the site. No temporary sheds will be allowed. All exterior utility equipment shall either be incorporated into the main building or, along with other detached structures, be architecturally compatible with the residence. All utility connections shall be carefully coordinated to minimize site disruption. All solar equipment shall also be incorporated into the structure and be architecturally compatible with the residence. 11. Fences and Screenine. The use of fences and screening will be prohibited except when used to define private "outdoor living areas" or to aid in the confining of pets to selected areas. Such fences shall be complementary in design to the main structure. Screens along property lines, in the form of fencing or formal planting, will be prohibited. A corral will be allowed, not to exceed 0.5 acre in size. 12. Lightine. All exterior lighting shall be of a "sharp cut-off" design, minimizing light spill onto adjacent properties. Such fixtures, used for illumination of walks, driveways, address signage, etc., shall be compatible with the building. 6 13. Antennas. Standard radio and television antennas shall be mounted in such a way as to minimize visual impact to surrounding residences. Low profile equipment, mounted close to the structure and painted a natural color will be required. Dish antennas shall be of the mesh type, painted black or dark green. Siting shall be done to effectively screen the dish from the surrounding open space areas. To this end, additional landscape screening may be required. 14. Landscape. All introduced plant materials shall conserve and complement the existing vegetation. Areas immediately adjacent to buildings may incorporate some ornamental plants but should quickly transition to more naturalized materials. These naturalized material areas shall consist of grasses, groundcovers, shrubs, and trees that are similar to those on-site or are analagous in appearance with low water requirements. Irrigation systems, when needed, should efficiently distribute water to these plants which require it. Temporary, drip or other low-water consumption irrigation systems will be encouraged where appropriate. 15. Leach Field. To construct a leach field suitable to service the residential development but not to exceed 1,800 square feet in area. 5. Grantee's Approval. Where Grantee's approval is required, as set forth in paragraphs 3 and 4, Grantee shall grant or withhold its approval in writing within sixty (60) days of receipt of Grantor's written request therefor. Grantee's approval may be withheld only upon a reasonable determination by Grantee that the action as proposed would be inconsistent with the purpose of this Easement. 6. Grantee's Remedies. If Grantee determines that Grantor or its successors and assigns is in violation of the terms of this Easement or that a violation is threatened, Grantee shall give written notice to Grantor of such violation and demand corrective action sufficient to cure the violation and, where the violation involves injury to the Easement Property resulting from any use or activity inconsistent with the purpose of this Easement, to restore the portion of the Easement Property so injured. If Grantor fails to cure the violation within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice thereof from Grantee, or under circumstances where the violation cannot be reasonably cured with a thirty (30) day period, fail to begin curing such violation within the thirty (30) day period, or fail to continue diligently to cure such violation until finally cured, Grantee may institute a suit to enjoin by temporary and/or permanent injunction such violation, or may take such other lawful action, including claims for damages as it deems necessary to ensure compliance with the terms, conditions, covenants, and purposes of this Easement; provided, however, that any failure to so act by the Grantee shall not be deemed to be a waiver or a forfeiture of the right to enforce any term, condition, covenant, or purpose of this Easement in the future. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that any prohibited activity be 7 undertaken on the Easement Property, the Grantee shall have the right to cause the restoration of that Easement Property affected by such activity to the condition that existed prior to the undertaking of such prohibited activity. In such case, the cost of such restoration shall be borne by Grantor, its successors or assigns. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to preclude Grantor from exhausting its legal remedies in determining whether that proposed activity to which the Grantee has objected is consistent with this Easement. 6.1 Costs of Enforcement. Any costs incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Easement against Grantor or its successors or assigns, including, without limitation, costs of suit and attorneys' fees, shall be borne by Grantor. If Grantor prevails in any action to enforce the terms of this Easement, Grantor's costs of suit, including, without limitation, attorneys fees, shall be borne by Grantee. 6.2 Grantee's Discretion. Enforcement of the terms of this Easement shall be at the discretion of Grantee, and any forbearance by Grantee to exercise its rights under this Easement in the event of any breach of any term of this Easement by Grantor shall not be deemed or construed to be a waiver by Grantee of such term or of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term of this Easement or of any of Grantee's rights under this Easement. No delay or omission by Grantee in the exercise of any right or remedy upon any breach by Grantor shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. 6.3 Waiver of Certain Defenses. Grantor hereby waives any defense of laches, estoppel, or prescription. 6.4 Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury to or change in the Easement Property resulting from causes beyond Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken by Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to the Easement Property resulting from such causes. 7. Access. Except for the trail right-of-way identified in paragraph 2(d) hereof, no right of access by the general public to any portion of the Easement Property is conveyed by this Easement. 8. Costs and Taxes. Grantor agrees to bear all costs of operation, upkeep, and maintenance of the Easement Property, and Grantee shall have no obligation therefore. In addition, Grantor agrees to pay any and all real property taxes and assessments levied by competent authority on the Easement Property or on this Easement. 9. Hold Harmless. Grantor and Grantee, their successors and assigns, shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend Grantee and Grantor, their members, directors, officers, employees, agents, and contractors and the heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of each of them from any and all liabilities arising out of use and ownership of the Easement Property. 8 10. Assignment of Grantee's Interest. The parties agree that the Grantee may transfer its interest in this Easement only to a qualified organization within the meaning of Section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended or any subsequent legislation, and authorized to acquire and hold conservation easements under Article 30.5, Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, as amended; provided, however, that the Grantee, as a condition of such transfer, shall expressly require that the transferee covenant to continue to carry out the conservation purposes which this Easement was intended to advance. 11. Subsequent Transfers. Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this Easement in any deed or other legal instrument by which it divests itself of any interest in all or a portion of the Easement Property, including, without limitation, a leasehold interest. Grantor further agrees to give written notice to Grantee of the transfer of any interest within thirty (30) days of conveyance. 12. Extinguishment. If circumstances arise in the future such as render the purpose of this Easement impossible to accomplish, this Easement can only be terminated or extinguished, whether in whole or in part, by judicial proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction. 13. Notices. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To Grantor: John D. Thompson, President Hiwan Ridge Development Company P. O. Box 3688 Evergreen, Colorado 80439 To Grantee: Mountain Area Land Trust P. O. Box 4063 Evergreen, Colorado 80439 14. Recordation. Grantee shall record this instrument in timely fashion in the official records of Jefferson County, Colorado and may re-record it at any time as may be required to preserve its rights in this Easement. 15. Miscellaneous. (a) The terms "Grantor" and "Grantee", wherever used herein, and any pronouns used in place thereof, shall mean and include the above named Grantor and its successors and assigns and the above named Grantee and its successors and assigns. 9 (b) If any provisions of this Easement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this Conservation Easement and the application of such provisions to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be affected thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this Deed of Conservation Easement this day of , 19_ GRANTOR HIWAN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY By: John D. Thompson, President Dated GRANTEE MOUNTAIN AREA LAND TRUST By: Daniel E. Pike, President Dated 10 MICHAEL J. NORTON mjnorton@)fw-law.com March 17, Via Facsimile (720-294-0879) G Floyd Borakove Rocky Mountain Mediation 244 S. Meade Denver, CO 80219 ' , RE: Applewood Baptist Church Proposed Land Use Dear Mr. Borakove: This will confirm our telephone discussions today about your willingness, as a part of Jefferson County Mediation Services, to assist with mediation in the matter of the proposed land use by Applewood Baptist Church of its land north of W. 32"d Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO. As I understand your recommendations, you believe that a mediation involving leaders of Applewood Baptist Church and selected members of the Wheat Ridge and Lakewood communities may be useful in narrowing issues in dispute over the Church's proposed use of its land. The first issue of concern has to do with whether such a limited group meeting would satisfy the request of Wheat Ridge city officials that the Church conduct another "public meeting" prior to submitting its land use application to the City. As you will note, I have provided a copy of this letter to Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner, City of Wheat Ridge, so that she may assure the Church that such a limited mediation will, in fact, satisfy this most recent request for another public meeting. I would anticipate that Ms. Reckert will coordinate this issue with City Manager Young and City Attorney Dahl. Obviously, if this approach does not satisfy the City's request for a public meeting, we will need to pursue a different option. Assuming, however, that such a mediation will, in fact, satisfy the City's request for another public meeting, as we agreed today, the following factors are important to the Church: It will be important that you are able to identify four to six members of the community who will be enabled to "speak" on behalf of the community so that, should general agreement be reached, the Church is not faced with BURNS FIGA & WILL RID, ATTORNEYS AT LAw 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 1030 ° Englewood, CO 80111 - P: 303 796 2626 ° F. 303 796 2777 ° www.bfw-law.com March 17, 2004 Page 2 BURNS FIGA & 1MLL P.C. the same objections at a later point in time in the process, as, for example, before the City Council. 2. It will be important that the entire process be completed by April 10, 2004. 3. It will be important that the selected members of the community be willing to dialogue rationally about concerns and not simply take the position that the neighborhood does not want the Church to use its property for any purpose whatsoever and, moreover, the neighborhood wants the Church to relocate to another site. With the foregoing in mind, the Church is ready, willing, and able to meet on one or two nights in the next two or three weeks to participate in such a process. For your information, the Church will likely have four decision-makers representing the Church present for the process and will also have members of the design team present so that, if it is at all possible to address legitimate concerns that are raised during the process and reach consensus on solutions, the right people will be there for this purpose. We hope you are able to identify four to six citizens who you can be assured will speak for the community and will stand by any consensus reached. We also think, however, that structured ground-rules must be in place for such meetings. It makes no sense to permit one or two members of the community to dominate the discussion so that no progress is possible. We also need to be assured that, should consensus be reached, the citizens who participate in the process will represent that fact to the City. Finally, we believe it is important that Ms. Reckert and other members of the City staff participate in these meetings. We look forward to working with you. Let me know if you have questions or comments. r hael J. Norton the Firm cc: Pastor Wittman Meredith Reckert 1AR-8 -'004 13:34 FROM:JEFFCO.MEDIATION.SER 303-271-5064 TO:93032352857 P:2/3 JEFFERSON COUNTY MEDIATION SERVICES MEDIATION CASE REFERRAL TO: Program Administrator Jefferson County Mediation Services (JCMS) 700 Jefferson County Parkway, Suite 220, Golden, CO 80401 271-5060, Fax 271-5064 REFERRED E/2C-0/7W BY: Name EA-r COURT - REGULATORY- ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS cbe,*au,eWWV cwld affu4med'Wan mid e mode 01 n ioa mquedd CONFLICT SUMMARY W Wft* ~ 3 - Z3S- Cl Comtctae Nvm6et ❑ R.**.WQAd - i ~~-KE2 I < /a07E CGyY/YGSV/ 0. 2-9 n. 6, kJ. R.. C /0/Z /~C6~ovnlCC✓C Tnie 30 3 - 2 3 S-- 28 Fee N= cm,1 Date ❑ Camdelmy.Carta Nome Telepyoae MsageJP+Ba Fax ❑ Cilatioa~Off®eNim6v Titk Please copy and attach file information relevant to this dispute. FapF I HAR-8-c004 13:34 FROM:JEFFCO.MEDIATION.SER 303-271-5064 TO:93032352857 P:3,3 DISPUTANTS N mes,addresses, telephone numbcrsofdisputants. Ifmorcthan four,listt to four gglor contact.,;; indicate below that more are mvolvetr #1 /~7(CIdFlE~ n/a( fin/ Foy APP! eu c~07 (3A PT1sT C fl ~c eCN llas been m. eyed Name(s) shoot modiatim fo t/co s . Fr a ~CC-YZ S C~E er zc L- C 5'u r rL ! 0 3 0 Yn ❑ No Ad&= L-7V G-L E L J a CD i L-e> ~-o C 1 / Rcpmdw positively? 3 03 - -7~ 96 - 26 Z~ 3U 3 - (c - Z6 z. (p 0 Y,a ❑ No 41031HI= Work Phonc X #2 Hna born cadnclod nbom medinion 0 Yes ❑ No Renpended poshivelyr kym ❑ No #3 Hu bern eoebided nbow mediation ❑ Y. kNo Acvwi&d positively? ❑ Y. ❑ No #4 nan born ounwed .bait medindon ❑Yrn ❑No Rnpotdod positive[)? ❑ Yos ❑ No C4 (-V",N/ 'DE42002F-r- Namc(a) //260 W. 2c0C re7 GUa33 Adder .303 - 232-`755 363 -23~ ZS /3 HenlEphe~' work Pjo ~IcAn 4EP-) 6AAPc66110 0 D PAi it F~ ~ P ~((DC~AJn<1L Nansc(s) .52-00 90 cu T/- Addrc 303 - 9/S _ Z6-73 Home phone -W.aw Mesagc NSN Ar R-f ej /ZA&PN j~E2/zl ~Fl°PeC-ZU000 ~L~re~~5 FcA~/Zeri~i~7ri~}t v4~Ge Nam(e) MOM 1303 - Za2 - 7- Z39 Hemegeao Work phone Memgdpager Are there more than four disputants? 4y- ❑ No If yes, how many? lo-Js Note: Please copy and attach file information relevant to this dispute. *M;t***#*****~sM:***~kM******+k*~k**s*x*ts*aM****+xn*s**g****t~M****Me**~ka**a*+~e*x******x:***s** JCMS Staff Use Only ASSIGNMENT Case Notes Mediator Date Co-Mediator ktMcd[brn*Vk Rjcdoc400 pagny Rev. 10/00 City of Wheat Ridge QF WHEgTP Community Development Department Memorandum °~~~RP~~ TO: Mark Loye, Jefferson County Mediation Program Director FROM: V 1Cleredith Reckert, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Request for facilitation DATE: March 12, 2004 Please let this correspondence serve as a follow-up to our conversation regarding the City's request for facilitation from your organization for a neighborhood meeting relating to a pending land use application in the City of Wheat Ridge. The Applewood Baptist Church is located at 11200 W. 32nd Avenue/11225 W. 32„ d Avenue. The church campus is split by W. 32nd Avenue with the main sanctuary building on the south side of 32°d Avenue within the City of Lakewood and an education building with parking located on the north side of the street within the City of Wheat Ridge. The portion within the City of Wheat Ridge contains roughly 14.7 acres and is zoned R-1. Churches and associated accessory structures and uses are special uses within the R-1 zone district. The church intends on filing an application for approval of a special use permit to construct an additional education building and parking lot on the Wheat Ridge portion. A meeting for neighborhood input regarding the application was held on November 18, 2003 at the Applewood Baptist Church. Roughly 250 people attended the meeting. It is unclear what the breakdown between church proponents and opponents was, but both sides were well represented. Since that time, the neighborhood has formed an association to protest expansion by the church. Staff and the Wheat Ridge City Council representatives have been inundated with input, both in favor and against the proposal. On March 11, 2004, City staff met with representatives of the church to discuss having an additional neighborhood meeting. After a fair amount of discussion, the church agreed. City staff and church representatives concur that an impartial facilitator should be present, it should be held on neutral territory and that ground-rules are needed. We are hoping the meeting can occur within the next three weeks. I would be happy to meet with and/or provide additional background information at your convenience and can be reached at 303-235-2848. 1 will be out of the office the week of March 15. In To: <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us>, <klap@comcast.net>, <BFtireCo@aol.com>, <JerryDitullio@comcast.net>, Subject: WR CITY COUNCIL LETTER MARCH 8, 2009 WHEATRIDGE CITY COUNCIL 7500 W 29TH AVENUE WHEATRIDGE, CO 80033 SUBJECT: SUPPORT FOR THE APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Page I of I AS MEMBERS OF YOUR DISTRICT AND THE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS OUR SUPPORT FOR THE APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH'S PURSUIT FOR A BUILDING PERMIT FROM THE CITY OF WHEATRIDGE TO BUILD AN ADDITIONAL EDUCATION STRUCTURE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 32ND AVENUE ON ITS PROPERTY. FOR OVER 43 YEARS, APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH HAS BEEN A WONDERFUL ASSET TO OUR COMMUNITY. THEY ARE STRIVING TO MAKE OUR COMMUNITY A BETTER PLACE TO LIVE AND WE COULD USE SOME HELP IN THIS DAY AND AGE. CURRENTLY, THE CHURCH HAS OUTGROWN ITS EDUCATION, STORAGE, AND RECREATION SPACE. THE CURRENT MEMBERSHIP IS 1500 AND THE EDUCATIONAL FACILITY CAN ONLY ACCOMMODATE 750 MEMBERS. THE CHURCH NEEDS MORE PARKING SPACES AND EDUCATIONAL SPACE TO BE BUILT ON THE NORTH PROPERTY. THE CHURCH PURCHASED THIS LAND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 32ND AVENUE PRIOR TO THE TIME THAT MANY OF THE CURRENT NEIGHBORS MOVED TO THE AREA. DIDN'T THE NEIGHBORS IN THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY KNOW THAT IT WAS OWNED BY THE CHURCH AND COULD BE DEVELOPED? DENVER AND MOST SUBURBS OF DENVER HAVE AND SUPPORT BIGGER CHURCHES. WE REALIZE THAT CHURCHES ARE NOT PROFITABLE FOR THE CITY, BUT THERE ARE SOME NECESSARY RESOURCES IN HAVING APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH IN OUR COMMUNITY. THEY HAVE THRIVING CHILDREN'S, YOUTH, AND SINGLE'S MINISTRY OPPORTUNITIES. OUR CHILDREN AND WE, AS PARENTS, BENEFIT FROM THESE SERVICES. APPLEWOOD BAPTIST ALSO PROVIDES FOOD AND CLOTHING TO NEEDY FAMILIES IN OUR AREA. WHAT A BLESSING THIS IS TO OUR COMMUNITY! THE CHURCH HAS DONE EXTENSIVE RESEARCH AND HAS CONSULTED EXPERTS IN TRAFFIC, LIGHTING, PARKING, AND LANDSCAPING TO BUILD THE ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL FACILITY WITH THE CONCERNS OF THE COMMUNITY IN MIND. MOST OF THE TRAFFIC OCCURS DURING LOW-VOLUME TRAFFIC PERIODS (IE: EVENINGS AND WEEKENDS). OUR AREA SCHOOLS CREATE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS DURING THE WEEK AT PEAK, MORNING, HIGH-VOLUME, TRAFFIC PERIODS. CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, BUSINESSES, HOSPITALS, AND RESIDENTS ALL PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN OUR "COMMUNITY." WE HOPE THAT YOU AND YOUR FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS WILL TAKE THIS LETTER INTO CONSIDERATION DURING THE APPLICATION PROCESS. WE ARE CONFIDENT THAT AFTER REVIEWING ALL THE INFORMATION, YOU WILL SEE THAT GRANTING PERMISSION FOR THE ADDITIONAL EDUCATION BUILDING/PARKING SPACES IS THE RIGHT CHOICE. SINCERELY, PATRICK & VICKI SEAL 3300 MOORE STREET WHEATRIDGE, CO 80033 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/29/2004 j Page 1 of 1 Subject: Applewood Baptist Church To: meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us Dear Ms. Reckert: I am adamently opposed to the proposed expansion of the Applewood Baptist Church facilities. Please don't exempt them from the current zoning of R-1, residential. My family owns a home at 11253 W. 29th Ave., just south a few blocks from the church. We have recently been made aware of ABC's expansion plans and are very concerned. ABC is no longer a neighborhood church, as many are in our part of the metro area. And their plans are to draw even more from outside our area. The traffic that's generated already due to church activities requires a police officer to stop and start traffic on 32nd Ave. in order to accomodate people going between the existing buildings on the north and south sides of the street. 32nd Ave. is a main thoroughfare and is a normal two-lane street. It's busy enough - I can't imagine the impact of the traffic that will be generated by ABC's expansion plans. And it's not just the traffic and noise right around the church property itself. The intersection at Youngfield and 32nd Ave. is already a nightmare. Add in the hundreds and hundreds of additional cars coming into our neighborhood off 1-70 and it's awful to contemplate. The church's own meeting minutes have made it plain that they expect to outgrow the 32nd Ave. location by the end of the decade and will need 30-40 acres in a different site at that time to accomodate all the metro area people they expect to draw. Why in the world would they want to invest more money in our neighborhood and then leave anyway? Why would the Wheat Ridge Planning Department recommend an exemption from the current zoning and allow the disruption to our residental neighborhood? Please don't recommend the exemption. Don't allow them to disrupt our neighborhood and make it into something that we didn't think we were moving into when we bought our home in Applewood. Thank you. Lela Rossi 11253 W. 29th Ave. Lakewood, CO 80215 file://C:\DOCUME-l\reckert\LOCALS-l\Temp\eudl6A.htm 3/29/2004 In Subject: Support for the Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application To: <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> City of Wheat Ridge ATTN: Meredith Reckert, Sr. Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 SUBJECT: Support for the Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application Dear Ms. Reckert, We have been members of your community for over 10 years, and we would like to urge you to grant Applewood Baptist Church a building permit from the City of Wheat Ridge so that they can build an additional education building on its property on the north side of 32nd Avenue. We believe this permit should be granted for the following reasons: 1. Applewood Baptist Church has existed in the community for over 40 years, and they purchased this land on the north side of 32nd Avenue many years before many of the current neighbors moved into the area. 2. Because of the Church's growth, it needs more space for education, recreation and storage. They only have enough education space for half of their current membership. 3. The Church wants to preserve the values of the neighborhood, not take away from them, and the additional education building will be consistent with the current building's look and feel. 4. The Church has conducted research and consulted with experts in the areas of traffic, parking, landscaping and lighting to make sure that their new building is in line with the concerns of the neighbors and the community. The new education building will be consistent with the current building's look and feel. 5. Because of the Church's growth, if the permit is not granted they may have to look for other property, which would mean selling the current property on 32nd Avenue. Depending on who purchased this property (i.e., a school, a real estate developer, etc.), the ramifications could be very negative for the community. We hope that you and other City Council members will consider these points during this application process. We are certain that after you review all of the information presented that you will see, as many of the area neighbors have, that granting the church a building permit for their additional education building is the right and fair thing to do. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, Page 1 of 2 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/29/2004 In Curt & Charlotte O'Hara 9660 W. 22nd Place Lakewood, CO 80215 cc: Mayor Gretchen Cerveny Council Person: Karen A. Berry Jerry DiTullio Dean Gokey Wanda Sang Karen Adams Mike Stites Lena Rotola Larry Schulz Page 2 of 2 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/29/2004 Page 1 of 1 To: <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Against Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Dear Meredith I am a second generation resident of the Applewood Knolls community. I am very concerned about the proposed expansion of Applewood Baptist Church located at 32nd and Quail. It will significantly increase traffic congestion, noise, pollution and, as a result, lower our property values. Please do not allow this expansion to happen. I would welcome the opportunity to talk with you personally. Please feel free to contact me by responding to this email message or by contacting me at (303) 274-2651. Thank you_ Sincerely, John Hutchins file://C:\DOCUME-I\reckert\LOCALS-I\Temp\eudl5F.htm 3/29/2004 In To: "Meredith Reckert" <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Mere, FYI. Alan -----Original Message----- From: Dick Matthews [mailto•dickCiilcna3.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:11 AM To: Adams, Karen Cc: Berry, Karen; DiTullio, Jerry; Gokey, Dean; Sang, Wanda; Schneider, David; Wise, Cheryl; Young, Randy; White, Alan Subject: Applewood Baptist Karen, That was a very informative meeting at the church last night. There maybe a legislative opportunity. It appears that many of the neighborhood problems are because the parking for the church is located across a busy street. The required parking should be within 300 feet of the facility and not separated from the facility by a collector or busier street. In this case I am not sure a pedestrian bridge like up at Faith Bible would work. If were going to church with small children or older folks I would park in the Lakewood neighborhood rather than cross 32nd or even cross a pedestrian bridge. Random thoughts: The ACLU could have a field day with the mix of religion and City policy. I am very glad the meeting was held in Lakewood:) At some future time this would make a good study session topic. Pete Klammer has still not learned that overstating his case impairs credibility. Lakewood Councilor Wise showed courage and wisdom with her comments about civility. Thanks, Dick Matthews Page 1 of 1 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/29/2004 ln- To: "Wendy & Todd Anderson" <ToddWendy50@msn.com>, "Bob & Carolyn Reed" <zepcommando@earthlink.net>, "Carol Duran" <cjduran@msn.com>, "Carol Taylor" <caroltaylor7@comcast.net>, Subject: AFRV News: ABC Application Delayed until April Old Business: Thanks to all for preparing, presenting, attending, and/or supporting the AFRV Community Rally! It was quite a success with about 100 total attendance, about 55% Lakewood, and 45% Wheat Ridge, residents (and 2% ABC church members!). We also collected: - 69 signatures on Petition to Deny Special Use - 10 more signed volunteers to appear at Special Use Public Hearing - 15 filled-in "Volunteer Sign-Up" sheets to pass future petitions, etc. - over $200 in donation checks This meeting also produced a very helpful front-page article, "Residents confront church expansion" in the Wheat Ridge Transcript newspaper Thursday March 11, written by Justinian Hatfield, who attended the full length of the meeting, interviewed several of us, and took pictures. (I recommend you support your community newspaper by subscribing: WR Transcript, 1000 10th St, Golden, CO, 80401 $30/yr.) Speaking of donations, I have asked Kathryn Gault (JKGault@aol.com, 303-233-5899) to serve as AFRV treasurer, on a Finance committee of five initially nominated Cindy Klammer, Jerry Scezney, Tony Marcello, and Ralph Perri. Their main duties are to administer a checking account to collect donations and disburse expense reimbursements. Speaking of expenses, we don't have final numbers for the February 27th mailout, but in light of the above-noted results, it was money well spent. Costs were approximately $600 to send about 2000 envelopes to residences bounded by Kipling, Ward, 20th, and 38th. We are grateful to Wheat Ridge United Neighborhoods for use of their bulk-rate mailing permit, which allowed us to mail 2000 pieces for about the same cost as 1200 pieces last time. Thank you for donations and "sharing sponsor" pledges; the Finance Committee will prepare a detailed report as soon as we have all expenses reported. New Business: The ABC application for Special Use has been delayed, pending a proper and documented Neighborhood Input meeting. Some details are embargoed until I get a response from W. R. Community Development, but basically, because the current City Council (yay!) overrode at least part of the past council's (boo!) stripping of the Special Use process, and restored (YAY!) the requirement for a formal Neighborhood Input Meeting (thank you Karen Adams and Jerry DeTullio, among others), such a meeting is now required. More details in a few days. Page 1 of 2 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/29/2004 Ir Page 2 of 2 Pete Klammer / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@ACM org Idealism may not win every contest, but that's not what I choose it for! Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/29/2004 In Page 1 of 1 To: <jerryditullio@comcast.net>, <khberry26@hotmail.com>, <Sangjw@aol.com>, <BFTireCo@aol.com>, Cc: <panderson@ci.wheatridge.co.us>, <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: NO to ABC Expansion! Hello Wheat Ridge Council Members, We have lived in the Applewood area, just a block east of Applewood Baptist Church, for 17 years. We have recently learned of the church's plan to expand significantly, and we want to voice our opposition to this plan. Although the church has been a good neighbor over the years, we cannot support its request for a special use permit for a zoning exception. We chose Applewood because it was such an established residential environment-- it had done all the "growing" it would be doing, and we could settle in without fear of rampant new development. The church build-out now threatens our peaceful surroundings with the very traffic congestion we moved here to avoid. Please cast your ballot against this special use permit when it comes up for review and voting. Expansion of this magnitude does not belong in our residential neighborhood. Best regards, Bob and Carolyn Reed Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/23/2004 City of Wheat Ridge of WHEgTP Community Development Department ° v m Memorandum c~~ORP~~ TO: Alan White FROM: Meredith Reckert SUBJECT: ABC - Legislative History DATE: March 23, 2004 Per your request, attached is the administrative history of the Applewood Baptist Church property located at 11225 W. 32"d Avenue. The property is zoned Residential-One and is 14 acres in size. • It appears that the church had ownership of land on the north side of 32"d Avenue as long ago as 1969. • The earliest building permit activity on the property was in 1972 when an existing barn on the property was remodeled into a youth center. • A building permit was issued in 1980 for erection of a temporary classroom building. • In 1983, a fill permit was issued for the placement of 98 cubic yards of fill material on the western side of the property. • An existing structure (house?) on the property was demolished pursuant to a demolition permit issued in 1984. • A building permit for construction of an education building was issued on May 5, 1984. The proposed structure has a building footprint of 8293 square feet and was noted on the permit application as being 2-1/2 stories high with two full stories and a basement. Site improvements with the proposed structure included a new curb cut, construction of a small parking area to the northeast side of the structure, private sidewalks, drainage facilities, landscaping and construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk. No public hearing process was required for construction of the new building as churches and accessory structures were permitted uses. The Certificate of Occupancy was issued on September 20, 1985. There have been allegations by neighbors that illegal fill was brought in which increased the building height to exceed the 35' height maximum. There is no separate freestanding fill permit but there may have been fill imported as part of the building permit approval process. The allowable building height at the time of construction was to be measured from finished grade. • A fill permit was issued on June 9, 1988 for construction of a parking lot to the west of the education building. • On May 7, 1989, a change of address notification was issued for the education building changing the address from 11305 W. 32"d Avenue to 11225 W. 32"d Avenue. On June 15, 1989, ordinance # 796 became effective which made churches a conditional use in the Residential-One zone district. Conditional uses were permitted uses which were subject to site plan review to ensure they were properly designed, developed, operated and maintained. Issues for design consideration included mitigation of potential impacts on surrounding land uses, street systems and public services or facilities. • In 1990, a demolition permit was issued for a house on the western portion of property. • In 1992, a fill permit was issued to allow placement of fill to the west of the existing parking lot. • W. 32na Avenue is reconstructed in 1992. • Case No. WV-93-6 was approved which vacated excess right-of-way from the 32°a Avenue street reconstruction project back to the property owner. • Planning Commission approved CUP-96-1 on April 4, 1996. The purpose of the CUP was for construction of additional parking (approx. 100 spaces) on the west half of the lot. The request was approved with the following conditions: 1. A six-foot high solid fence with a ten-foot strip of landscaping be installed along the western boundary.; and 2. Vertical landscaping be installed along the north side of the lot (parking lot). • On July 17, 1996, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss a potential conditional use application for construction of a sports complex to include a baseball field, two soccer fields and two tennis courts. Thirty people attended the meeting. No land use application for this request was filed. • A building permit for construction of the parking lot approved pursuant to Case No. CUP-96- lwas issued on December 12, 1996. • On April 10, 1997, a neighborhood meeting was held to solicit input regarding a pending CUP application. Twenty-one area residents attended the meeting. • An application was made for approval of a CUP to allow the construction of a baseball field and volleyball pits as ancillary uses to the church. The intent of the application (Case No. CUP-97-3) was to allow the church to use the recreation amenities as part of their ministry but to allow DeEvelyn High School to use the baseball field for practices and home games. A public hearing regarding this request was held before Planning Commission on May 1, 1997. This case was continued so a compromise could be reached between the church and the neighborhood. On August 22, 1997, the Church submitted correspondence requesting withdrawal of the application. • In February 2001, a revised zoning and development code was adopted which made churches special uses in all of residential zone districts. 2 On March 13, 2003, the church met with staff members to discuss submission of an application for a special use permit. Another item discussed was the requirement by the city for a consolidation plat. The consolidation plat would consolidate the two existing deed parcels into one. If there are no right-of-way dedications, the plat can be reviewed administratively. In May of 2003, City Council approved legislation modifying the special use permit process. Changes to the process included removal of the neighborhood meeting requirement, removal of the legal protest provision and removal of Planning Commission public hearing. The application starts as an administrative review. If one or more legitimate, written objections are filed against the application, the case is scheduled for public hearing in front of City Council. • On November 18, 2003, a neighborhood meeting to discuss the pending special use application was held at the ABC facility. On January 12, 2004, City Council approved Case No. ZOA-03-15 that modified the land use process chart in the zoning and development code. The requirement for a pre-application neighborhood meeting for special use applications was included in the legislation. • On January 14, 2004, the church submitted a land use application for approval of a two-lot consolidation plat. This case is currently open. arch 15, 2004 n~1 Dear Ms. Reckert, This letter is in reference to the`prbp&v l zoning change to allow the Applewood Baptist Church to build the intended large structures at the 32nd Avenue site. We have lived only about 5 blocks away in Wheat Ridge for 13 years. During this time we have seen a great increase in traffic along 32' Avenue, and most particularly at the church site. It is difficult for us to reach our own church services on Sundays and Wednesdays due to the stoppage of traffic for ABC members to cross the street or exit their parking lot. Cars are often stopped 5 deep in both directions. If this expansion is allowed, our quiet residential neighborhood will be changed into a busy, commercial- type thoroughfare. The planned expansions will more than double the square footage and parking at the site. This area has been a wonderful place to raise children and enjoy a pastoral community, and this expansion will diminish our quality of life in our homes. While we are in sympathy with the mission of ABC, their own planners acknowledge they will outgrow this site within 10 years. Why ruin our neighborhood for that? ABC would be better served building their campus in a commercially zoned area where they can have space for long- term growth. We urge you tony^this zone change and preserve our community. Thank you for your consideration. Sinncerrely,,I Dennis & Shirley Nelson 12080 W 32nd Drive Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 3031235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 Date: City Staff Present: Location of meeting: Property address: Property representatives present: Meeting Moderator: Existing Zoning: The City of Wheat Mdge April 13, 2004 Meredith Reckert Applewood Baptist Church 11200 W. 32°d Avenue 11225 W. 32°d Avenue Duffy Deardorff (executive pastor) Calvin Whittman (senior pastor) Mike Norton (legal counsel) Jim Moorehead (architect) Gary Theander (civil design engineer) Jason Hand (landscape architect) Fred Lantz (traffic engineer) Loren Priest (lighting engineer) Katherine O'Reilly R-1, Residential-One Comprehensive Plan Designation: Front half: Single family detached residential not to exceed four dwelling units per acre Rear half: Agricultural/Estate Residential not to exceed one dwelling unit per acre Existing Use/Site Conditions: The property contains roughly 14 acres. There is an existing, education building on the property with a building footprint of 8300 square feet, three stories in height with a basement. Other site improvements include three curb cuts, drives, landscaping, detention areas and parking for roughly 220 vehicles. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant intends on applying for a special use permit to allow the construction of an additional education building. The new structure will have an 11,300 square foot footprint with three stories of height. It will be similar in architecture and will be connected to the existing building. Parking for an additional 190 cars will be located to the north of the new building. Issues Discussed: 0 Does the Lakewood city council have any input? How will the City of Lakewood be involved in the process? As a referral agency, they will be given a formal referral including opportunity to review the traffic impact study. • There was discussion regarding the height of the existing and proposed structures. It was noted that both buildings have an average height of 35' based on the City's definition of "building height" which is measured from average finished grade, although some of the building walls exceed 35' in vertical height. • How much fill will be required to be placed on the property? 4'-6' How many yards of dirt will be needed? This figure has not yet been calculated. • How will drainage affect the property to the east? Where will drainage from new building pad and parking lot go? A drainage plan and report will be required with submission of the special use permit application. • What type of lighting is being proposed? It was noted that the existing site and structure lighting emits glare and bleeds over the property line onto the adjacent residential properties to the east. Is the activity lighting going to be different than security lighting? • Are there plans to use the building(s) for a charter school? Would there be another city review involving participation if a day school was planning on using the building(s)? Could there be a restriction placed on this approval that the property cannot be used as a public or private day school? • Further explanation was requested regarding the attendance breakdowns for Sunday church services and bible study classes. Why not add another bible study on Sunday morning? Could the existing building be used more efficiently in lieu of building a new education structure? • What is maximum building coverage allowed in the R-1 zone district? A maximum of 25% of R-1 zoned property can be covered with buildings. • What affect will there be on Lena Gulch and the wildlife habitat to the north? Would the church be willing to dedicate this area as open space? The increased amount of property covered by buildings and parking could negatively affect the Lena Gulch wildlife corridor. • Who will review the traffic impact analysis? How is it analyzed? The traffic impact analysis is reviewed by the city's traffic engineer using standardized traffic generation volumes based on use and size of the structure. • How is required parking calculated? • Can the neighbors review the technical documents? Yes, once an application is made, the technical documents submitted with the application are considered part of the public record. The file can be reviewed in the Community Development department in city hall. • Why isn't the design of the education building more residential in nature? Could the new structure be lower in height and oriented towards 32nd Avenue? It was noted that some of the parking directly west of the existing education building was required by the City of Lakewood to serve as overflow parking for the sanctuary on the south side of 32"d Avenue. Because of the agreement, this parking can't be displaced. The Wheat Ridge planning staff would like to see a copy of the agreement. 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Mdge 303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 ATENDANCE - APRIL 13, 2004 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE Tammy Sadler 11313 W. 18`h Avenue 303-232-5902 Michelle Bradford 3351 Kipling Street 303-237-3784 Jim Parr 603 Golden Leaf Way 303-582-5498 Julie Parr 603 Golden Leaf Way 303-582-5498 David Stradtman 12029 W. Carolina Drive Wendall Phillips 6885 Oberon Road 303-421-5165 Ann Phillips 6885 Oberon Road 303-421-5165 Calvin Wittman 6424 Norse Street 303-424-4932 Tim Shunk 10380 W. Warren Avenue 303-374-3306 Jim Moorhead 9731 Cypress Point Circle; Lone Tree 303-790-8065 Bob Oxford 3097 Owens Court; Lakewood 303-233-7083 Peggy Oxford 3097 Owens Court; Lakewood 303-233-7083 Kelly Wright 13700 Madison St; Thorton 80602 303-438-6515 Edwin Hastings 2673 Taft Street 303-238-2517 Joyce Hastings 2673 Taft Street 303-238-2517 Duffy Deardorff 303-683-9772 Shala Deardorff 303-683-9772 Dave Lloyd 3313 S. Nelson Court 303-986-7768 Sandy Lloyd 3313 S. Nelson Court 303-986-7768 Rick Gaudreau 12352 W. 7`h Place 303-274-9472 Chris Gaudreau 12352 W. 7`h Place 303-274-9472 Bill Schmidt 54 S. Lupine St; Golden 303-271-0253 Lary Lavender 6983 Quail St; Arvada 303-421-6749 Phyllis Lavender 6983 Quail St; Arvada 303-421-6749 Robert E. Clark 3630 Vance St; Wheat Ridge 303-463-4841 Scott McLean 1324 15`h St; Denver 303-534-3344 Ralph Gray 864 Braun Ct.; Golden 303-274-9371 Joyce Gray 864 Braun Ct.; Golden 303-274-9371 Russ Griffith 7716 S. Pierce 303-948-3878 Charlotte O'Hara 9660 W. 22nd Place; Lakewood 80215 303-274-9103 Chris Gilmoe 603 Entrada Dr.; Golden 80401 303-215-1438 Amy Arrington 11615 W. 31st Place; Lakewood 80215 303-205-1194 Linda Flentge 11852 W. 56`h Circle; Arvada 80002 303-420-1602 Gary Theander 12860 W. Cedar Dr. #102; Lake. 80228 303-987-3980 Sheryl Mosbarger 11158 W. 33rd Avenue; Wheat Ridge Margaret Heward 3046 Robb Circle; Lakewood 80215 1 Ed Edlund 13605 Braun Rd; Golden 80401 Kenneth Gunn 2281 S. Zang Ct; Lakewood 80228 Janet Cheadle 2825 Eldridge St; Golden 80401 303-279-3479 Bill Cheadle 2825 Eldridge St; Golden 80401 303-279-3479 David Paschal Chad Minor City of Lakewood 303-907-7737 Tom Devenish 2519 S. Eldridge St. 303-987-2019 Jen Zebel 12235 Viewpoint Dr.; Golden 303-462-3787 Dann Zebel 12235 Viewpoint Dr.; Golden 303-462-3787 Charlotte Stuker 1186 S. Kline St.; Lakewood 303-988-1956 Jim Stuker 1186 S. Kline St.; Lakewood 303-988-1956 Louise Turner 11256 W. 38`h Avenue 303-422-5134 Edwin V. Root 2984 Routt Circle; Lakewood 303-237-5368 Pete Klammer 3200 Routt; Wheat Ridge 303-233-9485 Cindy Klammer 3200 Routt; Wheat Ridge 303-233-9485 Dale Gr????? 4823 Field Ct; Wheat Ridge 720-898-3965 George Hack 3294 Quail St; Wheat Ridge 303-232-9495 Sylvester Rohn 3298 Quail; Wheat Ridge 303-232-0331 Mary Louise Rohn 3298 Quail; Wheat Ridge 303-232-0331 Dean Rossi 11253 W. 29`h Ave; Lakewood 303-462-1008 Lela Rossi 1253 W. 29`h Ave; Lakewood 303-462-1008 John Ayres 13049 W. 201h Avenue; Golden 303-232-3387 Jean Ayres 13049 W. 20`h Avenue; Golden 303-232-3387 David DiGiacomo 3275 Quail Street; Wheat Ridge 303-234-0162 Leeanne DiGiacomo 3275 Quail Street; Wheat Ridge 303-234-0162 Tom Radigan 10845 W. 32nd Avenue; Wheat Ridge 303-423-0198 Steve McKendry 907 Cole St.; Golden 303-239-8862 Dave Lucas 3220 Routt St.; Wheat Ridge Carla Milne 748 Alkire St; Golden 303-239-8084 Greg Milne 748 Alkire St; Golden 303-239-8084 Jeff Archer 11502 W. 315` Pl.; Lakewood 303-777-4619 Tracy Archer 11502 W. 31" Pl.; Lakewood 303-777-4619 Betty Post 2984 Routt Circle; Lakewood 303-237-5368 DeeDee Mann 10220 W. 25`h Avenue; Lakewood 303-233-2857 Erick Whittier 11250 W. 27`h Place; Lakewood 2 Applewood Baptist Church Building Project Neighborhood Meeting Wheat Ridge, Colorado Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:30 p.m. - 9 p.m. 11200 W. 32nd Avenue AGENDA I. Welcome, Introductions, Meeting Process - 10 minutes II. City of Wheat Ridge Planning Department Presentation - 10 minutes III. Church Building Project Highlights - 45 minutes IV. Neighborhood Concerns Identified & Detailed - 80 minutes Brainstorm Options V. Closing Comments - 5 minutes VI. Adjournment - 9:00 p.m. w o. h y t~ ai N Wheat Ridge Property • Applewood Baptist Church 9 11225 W. 32nd Ave. PLANNING & PW Fax:3032352857 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Rldge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2848 Fax: 303/235-2857 December 23. 2003 To Whom It May Concern: Apr 13 2004 1341 The City of Wheat Ridge P. 02 This memorandum is in regard to the pending application by Applewood Baptist church for approval of a special use permit to allow construction of an education building on Residential-One zoned property at 11200 West 32vd Avenue. On March 13, 2003, city staff members met with representatives of the church to discuss construction of the new education building. Prior to this meeting, staff had instructed the church to consider long-term build out scenarios and how placement of the education building could affect other future development on the property. Based on stalls request, the church presented a plan, which showed the education building and a new sanctuary structure for illustrative purposes only. Representation of the new sanctuary structure on the site plan for the education building does not give permission for it's future construction. The Community Development department has informed the church that the city would be unwilling to approve the sanctuary structure knowing it would not be built in the near future- Any construction beyond the terms of the application for approval of the new education building would have to be processed as a separate application. The church has acknowledged that their future needs may change. Questions regarding the City's special use permit process should be addressed to the Community Development department at 303-235-2848. Welcome to Applewood Baptist Church Education Building Project www.appiewoodbaptist.com Introductions ■ Dr. Calvin Wittman Senior Pastor calvinwittman@msn.com ■ Pastor Duffy Deardorff Executive Pastor F ddeardorff@appiewoodbaptist.com m m ;i T1 1 Introductions ■ Jim Moorhead, James E. Moorhead Architects - Planners ■ Gary Theander, Mountain States Engineering ■ Jason Hand, Staller & Henry, Inc. ■ Loren Priest, Priest Engineering ■ Fred Lantz, Lantz Associates Purpose of today's meeting To exchange valuable and constructive information with our members, neighbors and the community regarding the Education Building Project. t 2 History ■ Purchased land on North side of 32nd Avenue in 1971 ❑ Purchased land on South side in 1960 ■ Current Education Building was built in 1984 ■ Current buildings have met our needs for approximately 20 years. praft ;kIF History ■ Applewood Baptist Church has been a part of the Community for over 40 years. ■ The Church proactively works to be a good neighbor. ■ Steps are taken to ensure the Church's grounds and buildings are well maintained and fit with the look and feel of the neighborhood. Opro. 1, f1p 3 Community Participation ■ Three Sunday morning worship services ■ Two Sunday morning Bible study hours ■ Sunday night AWANA program ■ Wednesday night meals ■ Wednesday night youth activities ■ Wednesday night college services ■ Wednesday night G-Force children's activities ■ Weight control support group Community Participation ■ Women's Issues video series ■ Men's ministry ■ Weekly prayer meeting ■ Substance abuse support ■ Divorce recovery support ■ Adoption and foster care support ■ Bus outreach to underprivileged ■ Tuesday morning and evening Ladies Bible Optm tudies 4 Community Participation ■ Special programs for retired adults ■ Nursing home and senior care facility special programs ■ Premarital counseling ■ Weddings and funerals ■ Marriage and family counseling referrals ■ Benevolence and referrals am, to-. Community Participation ■ Community service site for Jefferson County ■ Election site for primary and general elections ■ Denver Inner City Health support ■ Concerts ■ National Day of Prayer site ■ Emergency evacuation site for Prospect Valley Elementary School ■ Special recognition for police, fire and EMT ersonnel of Wheat Ridge 5 Community Participation ■ Grounds use by Wheat Ridge High School marching band ■ Parkinson support group ■ Vacation Bible School annually for children grades K-5 (one week) Summer Day Camp for children (one week) ■ Youth camps ■ Easter sunrise service Community Participation ■ Celebrate America free annual event - food, concert, games for children, car show ■ Women's Community Health Fair with Quest Diagnostics, Mobile Mammogram, free hearing tests, vital signs, YMCA fitness tests, Golden Counseling Center, eye care, etc. ■ Fall Family Fun Festival for all ages (Halloween alternative) 6 Community Participation ■ Scrooge - free annual Christmas presentation ■ Christmas Eve services ■ Volleyball pit availability ■ Baseball field availability ■ Basketball/Hockey play pad availability ■ Provide no-parking cones for homes facing church ■ Wheat Ridge Carnation festival participation 7 i Why we need to build ■ We do not have the education space needed to accommodate our current membership. ■ Current residential membership is approximately 1,500 ■ As Church numbers grow, the percentage of growth decreases ■ Approximately 75% of our members live in the local neighborhood area ❑ Wheat Ridge, Arvada, Golden and Lakewood Why we need to build ■ Current education facilitie s can accommodate only 750 Average attendance: Worship Bible Study 8:00 a.m. 350 none 9:30 a.m. 192 618 11:00 a.m. 297 149 AMIg. 8 Why we need to build ■ Current education facilities can accommodate only 750 ■ Approximately 75% of our members live in the local neighborhood area ❑ Wheat Ridge, Arvada, Golden and Lakewood 9 Average Attendance for Worship and Bible Study The Building Plan ■ One 29,000 Square-foot addition to our existing building ❑ Classrooms ❑ A Multi-use/Recreation Room ❑ Storage Space ❑ Modern kitchen for meals and banquets ■ 12,000 Square-foot Footprint ■ Three floors: ❑ First floor Square-footage: 12,000 ❑ Second floor Square-footage: 12,000 ❑ Third floor Square-footage: 5,000 10 1999 2000 2001 2002 2009 2001 The Building Plan ■ Minimize parking in neighborhood streets ❑ Approximately 190 additional parking spaces ❑ The Church's proactive plan to minimize street parking ■ With the new education building and parking - over 65% of the Church's North property will be in its current natural state ■ Pedestrian Crossing ❑ Current Method Proven Effective ❑ Guard: Volunteer vs Police Officer (9/11) The Building Plan ■ One education building and additional parking is the only plan the church is pursuing. ❑ There is NO other "Master Plan" ❑ There is NO "additional phase to this project ■ Why do the other plans exist? ❑ Over the years, the church has considered various plans. ❑ The City of Wheat Ridge asked for this plan and Applewood Baptist Church complied with their request. 11 Research and Planning ■ Jim Moorhead, James E. Moorhead Architect Planners p4m 13 14 Research and Planning ■ Gary Theander, Mountain States Engineering 1 ■ Drainage Plan Research and Planning ■ Jason Hand, Staller and Henry e% 16 N -I~t Wheat Ridge Property - Applewood Baptist Church -11225 W. 32nd Ave. Note: pond placement and size are approximate SS~li.E AA Fd ~ -;i N f BAPTIST CHURCH )lw~tfi(,'NQLfF' - PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN / SECTION AA .1N.L 1. a N Wheat Ridge PmpWy * Applewootl Baptist Chumh A 11225W. 32nd Ave. S.cfl e Research and Planning ■ Loren Priest Priest Engineering Research and Planning ■ Fred Lantz, Lantz Associates F15urt3 ApPlewvwl HVpn ClercL F.~HXp in111c-BVneeo Nitldw &nuac 1 i i s s saw 114- 411 ~ s 19 flEOrc3 ♦pplewooE HUptlA(TUrafi Palorc 2nille - hlwaeo .11 idtlk Sarin I i i i i s 1 0 3zman w 71 a ~ IS, WIP, 20 Applewood Baptist Church Education Building Project Frequently Asked Questions Why does Applewood Baptist Church need this building? We have experienced growth in nearly every area of our church's life. The result of these bountiful blessings is that we need more education space to support our existing membership numbers. The additional education building and parking is the best solution to support our church and bible study attendance. Not only is this additional education space needed - it is simply the right thing to do. What is the history of the Church? Applewood Baptist Church purchased its land on the South Side of 32nd Avenue in 1960. Land on the North side of 32nd Avenue was purchased in 1971 (nine acres) with an additional smaller section purchased in 1984. We are proud to have been a part of the Community and at our present location for over 40 years. The current education building on the North side of 32nd Ave has met our needs for approximately 20 years and we anticipate the future education building and parking will meet our needs in future years. We are a long standing entity in the neighborhood with the majority of our members living in the surrounding local area. All future plans for our church is with the best interest of out members and the community in mind. What percentage of ABC members are living in the area? Approximately 75% of our members live in the Wheat Ridge, Lakewood, Golden and Arvada area. What is Applewood Baptist Church planning to build? We need more space and we have adequate land upon which to build. It is to this end that we are pursuing a building permit from the city of Wheat Ridge, which would allow us to build one additional education structure on our property on the north side of 32nd Avenue. The new building will be an addition to our existing building. What is the new building going to be used for? The new space will include classrooms for children and adults, a multi- use/recreation room and storage space as well as a much-needed modern kitchen for meals and banquets. Our new facility will certainly be an attractive and comfortable place for Bible education, fellowship and worship. What about traffic? We have had an extensive Traffic Impact Study completed for this project. The results of the study have shown that the traffic generated by the development proposed by ABC can easily be accommodated by the existing street system. What about drainage? We have had a drainage design of the ABC site prepared in accordance with the provisions of the City of Wheat Ridge Storm Drainage Design criteria to meet the requirements of the flood plain section of The Wheat Ridge Zoning Ordinance. What about parking? We will be adding approximately 190 additional parking spaces so that vehicles can be parked on-site and will not be forced into the surrounding neighborhood. We aim to continue to be good neighbors and are doing all we can to provide adequate parking on our site. In addition we are taking additional measures to encourage our members to use the parking spaces we are providing to minimize the parking in the surrounding neighborhoods. What about the lights? We are working with lighting experts to develop a lighting scheme/system which aims to provide a safety measure for parking lot users without interfering with our neighbors' space. The lighting in the parking lots will be on a timer. What about landscaping? The Church is seeking to be sensitive to our adjacent neighbors, and will continue to look for solutions that will be mutually beneficial. In doing so, we have experts to develop our space in a way that will add to the value of our neighborhood not deter from its existing charm. In our efforts to staying true to the look and feel of our surrounding neighborhood, the new building will not affect 65% of the Church's North property. With the addition of the education building, over half of Applewood Baptist Church's property on the North side of 32nd Avenue still remains in its current natural state. What other options and alternatives have you explored? We are trying to ease our space needs with multiple services and Sunday school hours, but these measures are, at best, temporary. The reality is that we need another building to effectively minister to those God is bringing our way. To project our future needs, we have evaluated the demographics in our area, current and future programs, and missions, as well as the purchase of other property. With the help of specialists in real estate, engineering, architecture, planning and modeling/design, Applewood Baptist Church has been able to analyze the best course of action for our future. After much time, research and effort, ABC is currently moving forward to add one new building on the north side of our present education facility, which sits on the north side of 32nd Avenue. Are there any other buildings planned for the property? We are not currently planning any additional buildings. In our research and planning we have explored numerous options for our land and in doing so there have been a number of options proposed. The result of this planning and research has been to pursue a building permit for one building and additional parking. What steps have you taken with the community/neighbors in mind? We not only want to improve our church, but to do all we can to improve our community as a whole. The Church is seeking to be sensitive to our adjacent neighbors, and will continue to look for solutions that will be mutually beneficial. In doing so, we have completed the necessary research in regards to traffic, parking, lighting and architectural studies to develop our space in a way that will add to the value of our neighborhood not deter from its existing charm. In addition, we are making every effort to keep our neighbors informed on the facts behind Applewood Baptist Church's plans moving forward. What is the timeline for the Education Building Project? We are currently completing our application to obtain a building permit from the city of Wheat Ridge. What will be the hours of this new education building be? We do not anticipate any major changes to the hours we currently have. We are not planning on changing our hours of operation. Our greatest attendance will continue to be on Sunday mornings and Wednesday afternoons. It is simply not in our religious practice, or conducive to our member's schedules, to have daylight-and-evening activities seven days a week. Is there another phase to this project? We are currently finalizing our application to obtain a building permit from the city for one additional building and parking. We are not pursuing any future building at this time. The current education building on the North side of 32"d Ave has met our needs for approximately 20 years and we anticipate the future education building and parking will meet our needs in future years. There are a number of proposals being circulated regarding the property - ABC has no plans of pursuing. The reason these plans exist can best be addressed by the letter released by the Wheat Ridge Community Development Department which states: "On March 13, 2003, city staff members met with representative of the church to discuss construction of the new education building. Prior to this meeting, staff had instructed the church to consider long-term build out scenarios and how placement of the education building could affect other future development of the property. Based on the staff's request, the church presented a plan, which showed the education building and a new sanctuary structure for illustrative purposed only. Representation of the new sanctuary structure on the site plan for the education building does not give permission for its future construction. The Community Development department has informed the church that the city would be unwilling to approve the sanctuary structure knowing it would not be built in the near future. Any construction beyond the terms of the application for approval of the new education building would have to be processed as a separate application. The church has acknowledged that their future needs may change." What services and events does the Church provide to the Wheat Ridge neighborhood besides Spiritual? Applewood Baptist Church provides and supports many community activities including: • Location for Local Health Fairs • Support Local Celebrations • Outreach Programs to provide food, food drives, clothing and other needs • Annual Holiday Presentation of Scrooge • Substance Abuse Support • Divorce Recovery Support • Bus Outreach for the underprivileged • Adoption and foster care support • Weddings and Funerals • Marriage and Family Counseling Referrals • Community Service site for Jefferson County • Election site for primary and general elections • Denver Inner City Health Support • Emergency Evacuation site for Prospect Valley Elementary School • Special recognition for police, fire and EMT Personnel of Wheat Ridge • Grounds used by Wheat Ridge High School marching band • Parkinson support group for the area • Celebrate America Annual Event - free food, concert games for children • Women's Community Health Far with Quest Diagnostics, Mobil Mammogram, free hearing tests, vital signs, YMCA fitness test, Golden Counseling Center, eye care etc. • Fall Family Fun Festival for all ages • Provided no-parking cones for homes facing church What is the expected typical attendance at Applewood Baptist Church? Average Applewood Baptist Church attendance by day and time - number includes both Worship Service and Bible Study. Sunday: 0 8:00 am - 350 0 9:30 am- 810 0 11:00 am - 446 0 5:30 pm - 228 Wednesday: o 5:30 pm - 250 What is the maximum expected number of visiting vehicles at any one time that the design is capable of handling traffic/parking? We are adding approximately 190 parking spaces. This will bring the number of total parking spaces (on both sides of 32nd Ave.) to over 500. What specific strategy is to be employed to maintain pedestrian safety? In the past we have used off duty police officers to direct street and pedestrian traffic. However, after the events of 9/11 these officers were no longer available to us. To accommodate the need we currently staff the cross areas with Church volunteers - a tactic that has been very successful. What current existing grade point on the property would the final not to exceed constructed height be measured from? The "not-to-exceed" construction height will be identical to the existing building. Where can I get more information and who can 1 contact with questions/comments? We solicit your support and your prayers as we begin this endeavor. If you wish to contribute, help or have specific questions about the Education Building Project, please contact Duffy Deardorff, Executive Pastor, at 303-232-9575, x 23 or ddeardorff@applewoodbaptist.com 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/235-2846 FAX 303/235-2857 Ridge NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Regarding the Applewood Baptist Church Education Building Project DATE: Tuesday, April 13th TIME: 6:30-9:00 p.m. LOCATION: Applewood Baptist Church 11200 W. 32nd Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Sam Baxter Barbara George Glenneta Baxter Life Estate Scott & Mona Wilcock Millicent Scott P.O. Box 1405 3137 Robb Cir. 3184 Routt St. Dubois, WY 82513 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Chad Minor City of Lakewood 480 S. Allison Pkwy. Lakewood, CO 80226 Roger Wadnal City of Lakewood 480 S. Allison Pkwy. Lakewood, CO 80226 Lela Rossi & Dean Rossi Gene Mulligan & Ann Rita Mulligan Edwin Post & Elizabeth Post 11253 W 29th Ave 3024 Routt Cir 2984 Routt Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Scott Mitchell & Phoebe Mitchell 3252 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 John Emge 3342 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Ralph Perri II & Deborah Perri 1090 Holland St Lakewood, CO 80215 Robert Kumley III & Kumley Susan Ross 11595 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 John Patrick Pruyn Jr. & Linda Pruyn 3292 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Louise Turner & D Edwards Loren 5393 Maggie Ln Evergreen, CO 80439 Durk Investment Company 120 S Riverside Plz Chicago, IL 60606 John Odom Jr. & Lorrie Furman Odom Paul Wood & Kathleen Wood 11490 W 38th Ave 3045 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Paul Wells & Johanna Wells J D Johnston 16546 W 79th Dr PO Box 1508 Arvada, CO 80007 Bethany, OK 73008 Bette Jean Rodricks Timothy Seidel & Lorraine Seidel 3322 Simms St 3272 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Howard Noble Jerry Turner & Louise Turner 2449 W 35th Ave 11256 W 38th Ave Denver, CO 80211 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Louis Ficco & Anthony Ficco Howard Noble 3650 Vance St 980 Whispering Oak Dr Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Castle Rock, CO 80104 Rodney Casados & Linn Phelps Deborah Kidder 3201 Routt St 3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 William Cook 3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 A-06-2004 2:14PM FROM APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CH 303 238 2613 45 /l t 1'(A j Applewood Baptist Church 11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jeffrey Pritt 3197 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 James Mckay 3078 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Louis Leprino & Nyla Leprino 3049 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 David Hittle & Jane Hittle 3159 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Richard Atchison & Charlene Atchison 12115 W 29th PI Lakewood, CO 80215 Gary Riedel & Sherri Riedel 11553 W 31st PI Lakewood, CO 80215 Strand Oliver A & E G 3224 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Louis Martinelli & Sylvia Martinelli 11552 W 31st PI Lakewood, CO 80215 Baxter Glenaeta M Life Estate Sam Baxter III 3084 Routt Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Marvin Van Otterloo Maxine Van Otterloo 11600 W 31st PI Lakewood, CO 80215 Margaret Howard 3046 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Warren Mcnassor & Virginia Mcnassor 3099 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Perry Alvan S & Perry Rita 3062 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Clare Hamilton 11264 W 31st Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Willard & A S Gabel 3274 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Clifford Elson 11555 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 R Spencer Prahl & Becky Prah! 3294 Pierson St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wilfred Sugai 11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 David Lucas & Nancy Lucas 3220 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Michael Larkin & Barbra Larkin 3187 Robb Cir Denver, CO 80215 Raymond Langen & Winona Langen 3067 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Jan Lakes & Cindy Danaher 3095 Quail St Lakewood, CO 80215 Joseph Broccio 2895 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 E T Bond III & Esther Bond 3253 Pierson St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Joee & Jeff Schleusner 3254 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Timothy James & Daniel James 3223 Pierson St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Barry Willmartb & Teri Willmarth 3047 Routt Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 C. 76 Applewood Knolls Swim & Tennis Club in. 13471 W 25th Ave Golden, CO 80401 Jeffrey Archer 11502 W 31stP1 Lakewood, CO 80215 P. 3 4-06-200d. 2:1APM FROM APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CH 303 238 2613 P_a Etha Logan Gary Schroeder & Patricia Schroeder Carl Smith & Mary Smith 3087 Rmm Cir 12600 W Auburn Ave 11532 W 31 st PI Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80228 Lakewood, CO 80215 Paul Hintgen & Cindy Hintgen Doris Thomson Victor lacino & Yolanda Amato 11582 W 31st PI 11593 W 31st PI 2439 Ward Dr Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Gregory Jarvis & Barbra Ramsey Jarvis Bartoletti Properties Lip Elizabeth Hatt 3293 Pierson St 11157 W 31st Ave 3327 Pierson St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 James Sharon & D Jo Shannon Linda Hock James Bray & Vivian Jo Bray 11108 W 33rd Ave 3294 Quail St 3065 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Madeline Hart Thomas Miller & Mary Miller Robert Wood & Joyce Wood 10968 W 31 st Ave 11590 W 32nd Ave 10927 W 31 st Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 W atlington Edward A & P K Raymond Black & Cynthia Black Sylvester Rohr & Mary Rohr 10961 W 30th PI 10991 W 30th PI 3298 Quail St Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Robert Reed & Carolyn Haas Charlotte Derstler & Richard Salankey Craig Stephen Buth & Susan Marie Buth 10938 W 31st Ave 11038 W 31st Ave 11057 W 3lst Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wallis Gamble & Maureen Gamble Paddock Susan Rodney Patrick & Jeanette Patrick 11068 W 31st Ave 11027 W 31st Ave 11435 W 32nd Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Thomas Alexander Emerson Droullard & Lily Droullard Asumo Rocco D The & Rocco Violet Astur 10992 W 30th PI 11560 W 32nd Ave 3154 Routt St Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Millicent Scott & B D George David Deuben & Leah Camille Deuben David Cole & Marjorie Cole 188 Chippewa Cir /7 10962 W 30th PI 3050 Quail St Henrietta, NY 1446-1) Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 A-06-2084 2-16PM FROM APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CH 303 238 2613 Mary Wilson Walter Prebis & Lona Prebis PO Boy 83 3060 Quail St Manville, WY 82227 Lakewood, CO 80215 Carl Hansen & Betty Hansen Hugh Eugene Baker & Barbara Baker 3054 Routt Cir 10957 W 31 st Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Regional Transportation District Emil Klein & Anna Klein 1325 S Colorado Blvd 3224 Pierson St Denver, CO 80222 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 John Deffert & Maria Deffert Robert Rupp Jr. & Ingrid Rupp 3226 Pierson St 3284 Pierson St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jerome Scemey & Jacqueline Hunt Leila Hill & Mc Arthur Hill 3395 Quail St 3345 Quail Si Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Virginia Cellars & Robert Cellars Jeffrey Nielsen & Jeffery Nielsen 3310 Routt St 3281 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jefferson County Schools Dist Rl Lakewood Ford Inc 1829 Denver West Dr 11000 W Colfax Ave Golden, CO 80401 Lakewood, CO 80215 Shawn & Cathy Swainson Harbert Hartline & Ruth Hartline 3204 Quail St 11151 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Richard Anthony Chinisci Kurt Miller & Donna Miller Georgia R Chinisci 3201 Routt St 3204 Pierson St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Gambro Inc Roger knight 10810 W Collins Ave 1800 Washington Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Golden, CO 80401 P. 6 Ronald Mecartney & Constance Mecartney 11158 W 31st Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Anthony Marcello & Lori Joan Marcello 3241 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Daniel Greisen & Carol Greisen 3274 Pierson St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 James & Adele Otoole 3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Ernest Wright & Patricia Wright 3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Ross Casados Jr. & Olga Casados 3291 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 David Digiacomo & Leeanne Digiacomo 3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Luethy Helen 15947 W Ellswood Ln Golden, CO 80401 Peter Klammcr & Cynthia Klammer 3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 4-06-2004 2:1SPM FROM APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CH 303 238 2613 Mark & Amy Sares Arthur & Linda Gibbard 3455 Quail St. 3415 Quail St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Anthony & Barbara Craven David & Jill Moss 3280 Routt St. 3221 Routt St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dolores Archer 3260 Routt St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Duane Chesley 3261 Routt St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 P. 6 March 9, 2004 Meredith Reckert Sr. Planner, Planning and Zoning Div. ~9Qra C/~/ City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 19 Dear Meredith, I have been a homeowner at 11253 W. 29th Ave. for over ten years. My house is two blocks from the Applewood Baptist Church. I have recently been made aware that they have applied for a special permit to construct a very large building on the north side of 32nd Ave. as the first part of their intended two-phase, five-year expansion. Please do not give them permission to do this. My family and I enjoy the tranquility of our residential neighborhood, which is why we chose to live here. There are already problems on church service and activity days when churchgoers take driving shortcuts through our small streets and park in front of our houses, and I'm very concerned about the danger, noise, congestion, and pollution the added traffic of the nearly 2,000 parishioners that the church hopes to draw would bring to our neighborhood. If the Applewood Baptist Church fulfills its overall plans for expansion, their parking lot will be bigger than Wal-Mart's! Is this something you would want just steps from your home? If the Applewood Baptist Church is intent on expanding, they should proceed in doing so by purchasing and building on a new piece of property in a commercial location more suited to their goals, not in a strictly residential neighborhood zoned for families in single- family homes. What makes this expansion plan all the more ludicrous is that the church is already aware that, if their expansion plans for 32nd Ave. are approved by the Wheat Ridge City Council, they will, by their own projections, outgrow the property and new facilities within less than ten years, and they will subsequently need to relocate and rebuild anyways. Our residential area would then be left with three very large, vacant buildings and a huge, empty parking lot to blight our neighborhood until some other large, commercial enterprise chose to purchase them. I urge you to vote against their request, for the sake of our neighborhood and the families that live here. Thank you for taking the time to listen to my viewpoint. sincerely, %,Dean Rossi 11253 W. 29th Ave. Lakewood, CO 80215 303-462-1008 IL El ~sj e~ o M-g X &ro 41 gtlg ~ ~ri'~~ ~ d ~x e a fits g~ tlg ®Qd~ ~w$ 100 '9 LLOS 09Z HUM XV9 'ONI WE WOI WV LI 60 NOW-600Z-90AVW •Ia~PpR~~R e av ~ °15 a 200'9 LLOS 09Z 909 ON XV9 ')NI NMONE WOI WV LI:60 NOK-HOZ-90-OW Page 8 of 8 > > > > > Karen A. Berry: > > > > >My wife and I live near 32nd & Simms, and have for the > > > past 32 years. We > > > > >both want to be sure you know that we are against the > > > proposed building > > > > >plans of the Applewood Baptist Church. > > > > >The planed educational building is only phase 1 of a long > > > range plan that > > > > >includes a worship center that will seat 1,840 > > > parishioners. That is too > > > > >large of a building to be located in a residential area. > > > We do not want > > > to > > > > >lose what we have enjoyed for the past 32 years, a quite > > > residential > > > > >neighborhood. > > > > >We are requesting that you do not allow the building plans > > > of the Church > > > to > > > > >go forward. This must be stopped now before it is too late. > > > > >Don & Betty Ankerholz > > > > Fast. Reliable. Get MSN 9 Dial-up - 3 months for the price of l! > > > > (Limited-time Offer) > > > http://click.atchnt.com/AVE/go/oninOO200361 ave/direct/O1/ Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredithpci.wheatridge.co.us.> 111;11?nna In To: "Meredith Reckert" <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Church building plans Mere, Four your information (amusement?) Alan -----Original Message----- From: Jerry DiTullio [mailto:jerryditullio(a)comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 8:59 PM To: pklammer@acm.org Cc: 'Gerald Dahl ; 'Alan White; 'Randy Young; BFtireCo@aol.com; councilorschulz@comcast.net;'Karen Adams; Sangjw@aol.com Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Church building plans Hi Pete, Thanks for your comments. As a general new policy of the city I will be requesting/supporting that a facilitator be implemented in controversial issues between opposing parties in the city. A 3rd parry facilitator is not staff, will take notes and will allow EVERYONE to be heard and will not allow one person to bully or monopolize the discussion, pro OR con. It's good public policy to me. We need to think outside the box and this concept may apply to other issues where it may be neighbor vs. neighbor. I see no reason for these issues to come before Council with everyone loaded for bear and drawing lines in the sand without talking to EACH OTHER ...Lock the door and figure it out. Thanks Page 1 of 8 -----Original Message----- From: Pete Klammer [mailto:pklannner@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 12:22 AM To: jerryditullio@comcast.net Cc:'Gerald Dahl;'Alan White;'Randy Young; BFtireCo@aol.com; councilorschulz@comcast.net;'Karen Adams; Sangjw@aol.com; khberry26@hotmail.com Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Church building plans Hi Jerry - You've got it all wrong. This isn't a little misunderstanding about "how big" the church building might be. This is a total disagreement about "at all". The Applewood Baptist Church (ABC) would like Wheat Ridge to override its R-1 zoning and its Comprehensive Plan, to solve ABC's budgetary problems, at Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/5/2004 In the expense of Applewood (Wheat Ridge and Lakewood) residential neighborhood values. This isn't a problem to be solved by mediation, because the church's goals are entirely contradictory to the neighbors needs. We have offered in the past (since 1997 at least) to meet with the church (we have this documented in council minutes from 1997, and on videotape November 18, 2003), and the church has repeatedly declined, claiming that their development of their property is none of our business. They are willing to TELL us what they are going to do, but they have no need of our input, our suggestions, our concerns. Thank you, Jerry, for restoring the "Neighborhood Input" element to the special-use permit process, but that process was not in place or in force when the church announced their plans to Meredith Reckert in March 2003; ABC did invite (a few) neighbors to the church November 18, 2003, (we copied that invitation to about 1200 more residents), and they trumpeted this meeting with great fanfare as a voluntary step on their part, but in fact this was not a "Neighborhood Input" meeting it was an "Applicant Output" meeting, at which we were required to, shut up and listen for an hour, and then allowed to ask a few questions, but dismissed if we offered input, and the meeting was unilaterally ended before everyone in line had a chance to speak. All we heard from ABC was talk of "property rights" and "first amendments rights" but residential neighborhood values be damned. This isn't a problem to be solved by compromise, because it is a battle of little cuts, little wedges, little increments, that ratchets only one way: namely, more and more buildings and traffic. The church is on a one-way campaign to build out a "faith campus," and in their mind it not a question of "if', but only "when". Compromise assumes inevitability, and mediation merely postpones or delays it. Do you want 28,000 square feet of construction right away, or do you want 14,000 square feet now and 14,000 square feet later? We do not accept that inevitability. Just because the church has painted themselves into a corner with their first education building, doesn't mean that we owe them more paint to make it worse. We want the land developed as it was zoned, R-1, low-density residential. We want our neighborhood to stay residential. We want more taxpaying residential neighbors like ourselves. We want homes with families, kids to play with our kids, and consistent residential lifestyle values. We want neighbors who we will look out for, and who will look out for us and our kids, as they drive here, as they walk around here, as they participate in community decisions here. We do not want multistory office and classroom buildings. We do not want acres of asphalt. We do not want institutional even if non-profit business enterprises serving Greater Metro Denver from a residential side street. We do not want a couple hundred parking spaces on one side of 32nd Avenue supporting worship services on the other side [REALLY! Would you approve a movie theatre in Lakewood with parking in Wheat Ridge, or Walgreen's on one side of 32nd, with the Walgreen's parking on the other side? OF COURSE NOT!] We do not want the vandalism magnet that non-resident property becomes, the litter burden, the noise burden, the parking-lot light Page 2 of 8 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@aci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/5/2004 In pollution burden. We do not want a couple thousand members unconnected to our neighborhood trafficking in and out and threatening the safety of our kids who are coming and going to Prospect Valley, coming and going to Applewood Knolls Swim and Tennis, coming and going to each others' homes on either side of 32nd. We do not want more and more traffic cones and reflector-vest cops and flashers and flares throttling drivers for mass pedestrian crossings. We do not want Wheat Ridge views and Wheat Ridge wildlife spaces taken away with no redeeming compensatory consideration to the neighborhood. This is not "win-win" this is all "take-take". We honestly, sincerely, respect the mission of this church, and wish it Godspeed success, but not here. This is not an appropriate site for the scale of activity they maintain and project. There are dozens of examples of small neighborhood churches all around Wheat Ridge that fulfill their missions on scales appropriate to their sites Our Lady of Fatima serves a similar-sized congregation, and weekday school, on about 2 acres, without enforcing their own traffic and pedestrian control, as ABC does. There are also dozens of examples of large religious enterprises that succeed on commercial-style locations Faith Bible Worship Center on Ward Road at 64th, and others up and down Ward road, can fill and empty their parking lots without blocking single-lane traffic in each direction, as ABC does. ABC has mega-church ambitions in a local-neighborhood location. We don't deny that the church has a valuable endowment, as well as the duty not merely to be a custodian of that endowment, but to put that endowment to good use and service towards the church's mission. That doesn't give them the right, however, to trample roughshod over the neighborhood's rights. We expect the church will soon realize the best, highest use of their endowment is to liquidate their holding, with proceeds to fund the better location that their ambition demands. Indeed, they already recognized this themselves, in the Long-Range Planning Committee report published in their March 2002 newsletter (published to congregation and community not just an "internal document"), and voted with "overwhelming" approval of the congregation April 21 st as announced in their May 2002 newsletter. Unfortunately, it seems they focused on acreage instead of urban density (see Fatima, above). Just because they shopped around and couldn't find big enough land, doesn't mean our neighborhood should bear the brunt of their budget mismatch. We're just not going to let our residential neighborhood be converted into an office park, ratchet by ratchet, compromise by compromise. Best hopes, Pete Klammer / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) 3200 Routt Street/ Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / MailtoPKlammer@ACMorg Idealism may not win every contest, but that's not what I choose it for! > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry DiTullio [mailto_,'eiTvditullio@comcast.net] Page 3 of 8 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/5/2004 In > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:44 PM > To: 'Don Ankerholz; pklammer@acm.org > Cc: Gerald Dahl; Alan White; Randy Young; BFtireCo@aol.com; > councilorschulz@comcast.net; 'Karen Adams; Sangjw@aol.com; > khberry26@hotmail.com > Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Church building plans > Pete, > It's my understanding that it is not quasi until an > application is filed > with the city, however; I still think it would be beneficial > if the church > and neighbors were in the same room together and worked this > out without > government intervention. This worked in District I a few > years ago during a > development project. I would suggest a 3rd party mediator > paid for by the > church and neighbors, or see if you can get a volunteer from > the county. > Good luck.. > -----Original Message----- > From: Pete Klammer [mailto pklammer@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:36 PM > To: jerryditullio@comcast.net; 'Don Ankerholz' > Cc: khberry26@hotmail.com; Sangjw@aol.com; 'Karen Adams; > councilorschulz@comcast.net; BFtireCo@aol.com > Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Church building plans > I guess my e-mail missed the mark by not having Karen Berry's > attachment. > The first issue to be resolved is: can council > representatives discuss this > with constituents or not? Is it quasi-judicial now already > or not? Karen > Berry seems to think it is; I think she is mistaken: > MEMORANDUM FROM THE DESK OF KAREN BERRY > TO: CONCERNED CITIZENS > FROM: KAREN A. BERRY > SUBJECT: APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH > DATE: 3/3/2004 > I want to thank you for taking the time to contact me; > however, when reading > that your correspondence concerns the Applewood Baptist > Church, I was not Page 4 of 8 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/5/2004 In > able to read your concerns or address them in this memo. The > church is > proposing to file a land-use application with the City of > Wheat Ridge; the > law allows landowners to file land-use applications with the city. In > Colorado, land-use applications are considered > "quasi-judicial" which means > that the city council acts somewhat like a jury when > considering a land-use > application. > Colorado law prohibits the city council from receiving > information about the > application outside the hearing process and receiving such > information may > invalidate any decision city council makes on the > application. I know that > both sides will invest much time and energy into conveying > their concerns > and opinions to the council and the city will invest > significant time in > reviewing those concerns. I do not wish to do anything that may result in a > waste of those resources. > I value your input and hope that you will participate in the > public hearing > process and express your concerns. In addition, once an > application has > been filed, please feel free to express your concerns to the > city's planning > department. The planning department will gather all citizen input and > forward concerns to the city council as part of the public > hearing process. > This will ensure that all members of city council are > receiving the same > information, on which to base a decision, and that information will be > available to all interested parties. > Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me; citizen > participation is > important in making sure that all stakeholders are represented. > Karen A. Berry > Wheat Ridge City Council > District I > Pete Klammer / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) > 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 > (303)233-9485 /Fax: (3 03)274-6182 / Mailto:PK_l_ammer@ACM ore Page 5 of 8 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/5/2004 In > Idealism may not win every contest, but that's not what I > choose it for! > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jerry DiTullio [mailto:jen-yditullio@comcast.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 6:16 PM > > To: pklammer@acm.org; 'Don Ankerholz' > > Cc: khberry26@hotmail.com; Sangjw@aol.com; Karen Adams; > > councilorschulz@comcast.net; BFtireCo@aol.com > > Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Church building plans > > Mr. Klammer, > > While I understand your concerns and comments, it makes more > > sense to me > > that you speak with the church on the issue since your issues > > are with the > > church and not the City Council at this time. The church > > owns the land and > > they are the potential applicant. > > Why can't you and your team meet with church owners and > work this out > > amongst yourselves? This is just a suggestion. > > Thanks > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pete Klammer [mailto:pklammer@comcast.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 5:59 PM > > To: 'Don Ankerholz' > > Cc: khberry26@hotmail.com; Sangjw@aol.com; Karen Adams; > > JerryDiTullio@comcast.net; councilorschulz@comcast.net; > > BFtireCo@aol.com > > Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Church building plans > > I have a (verbal) opinion from Senior Planner Meredith > > Reckert, that until > > and unless the application is filed (it is a "Special Use" permit > > application), the matter is NOT YET "quasi-judicial," and we > > are encouraged > > to speak and correspond with our council representatives up > > until that time. > > I would be happy to share the words of any councilor > > confirming or denying > > this, and I would regret any time lost in the interim if councilor > > inappropriately declined to hear us. Page 6 of 8 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/5/2004 In > > Best hopes, > > Pete Klammer / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) > > 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammeroaACM.ore > > Idealism may not win every contest, but that's not what I > > choose it for! -----Original Message----- > > > From: Don Ankerholz [inailto:bdholz@comcast.nct] > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 2:15 PM > > > To: Bates, Colleen > > > Cc: AFRV@bigfoot.com > > > Subject: Fw: Applewood Baptist Church building plans Original Message > > > From: "Karen Berry" <khberry26@hotmail.com> > > > To: <bdholz@comcast.net> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:51 AM > > > Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Church building plans > > > > Please see the attached memo. > > > > >From: "Don Ankerholz" <bdholz@comcast.net> > > > > >To: <khberry26@hotmail.com> > > > > >Subject: Applewood Baptist Church building plans > > > > >Date: Mon, I Mar 2004 17:24:20 -0700 > > > > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > > > > >Received: from rwcrmhcl3.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]) by > > > > >mc 10-fl 8.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Mon, 1 Mar > > > 2004 > > > > >16:24:09 -0800 > > > > >Received: from sugarfoot > > > (c-24-8-127-248.client.comcast.net[24.8.127.248]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id > > > > ><200403020024090150044mige>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:24:09 +0000 > > > > >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jHYYvaiZCvVgEmT+3ikwQsZ > > > > >Message-ID: <004a0lc3ffec$b4a8ec40$f87fn818@sugarfoot> > > > > >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > > > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 > > > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 > > > > >Return-Path: bdholz@comcast.net > > > > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2004 00:24:09.0343 (UTC) > > > > >FILETIME=[AE04FOFO:OIC3FFEC] Page 7 of 8 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@c i.wheatridge.co.us> 3/5/2004 In > > > > > Karen A. Berry: > > > > >My wife and I live near 32nd & Simms, and have for the > > > past 32 years. We > > > > >both want to be sure you know that we are against the > > > proposed building > > > > >plans of the Applewood Baptist Church. > > > > >The planed educational building is only phase 1 of a long > > > range plan that > > > > >includes a worship center that will seat 1,840 > > > parishioners. That is too > > > > >large of a building to be located in a residential area. > > > We do not want > > > to > > > > >lose what we have enjoyed for the past 32 years, a quite > > > residential > > > > >neighborhood. > > > > >We are requesting that you do not allow the building plans > > > of the Church > > > to > > > > >go forward. This must be stopped now before it is too late. > > > > >Don & Betty Ankerholz > > > > Fast. Reliable. Get MSN 9 Dial-up - 3 months for the price of 1! > > > > (Limited-time Offer) > > > http://click.atdint.com/AVE/go/omnOO200161ave/direct/Ol/ Page 8 of 8 Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/5/2004 Meredith Reckert Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29"' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Ms. Reckert: 0~~~i March 4, 2004 b~N I'm writing to express my concern regarding the on enlarging problem that exists along 32nd Avenue, west of Kipling. With a student in the Wheat Ridge High School band, we make many, many trips up and down 32"d Avenue. Often, we are stopped by people standing in the middle of the street with crossing guard equipment. The crossing guards are not there to help kids get to the nearby elementary school, during regular school hours. They are there--at all hours, every day--to force traffic to a halt so people going to the Applewood Baptist Church do not have to wait for a natural break in traffic to cross the street. They cross in the middle of the block, just a few yards away from an existing light. If this occurred infrequently, it would merely be an annoyance, an example of a neighbor asking others to indulge them a small inconvenience. However, it happens all the time. On differing occasions, I've been part of a line of traffic reaching from the church back almost to Simms. This was because the person blocking traffic thought it more important to let one or two of their people cross as they arrived at the sidewalk, rather than make them wait two minutes until a larger group had formed. I was also waiting in line as a church person held up oncoming traffic so someone from his church could pull out of line, drive past those waiting, and make a left hand turn into the parking lot. Most people know better than to cause such dangerous situations. As I pulled up to the person blocking traffic, I asked him what gave him the authority to cause such traffic hazards. He gave me a wild-eyed look. Credit him for not saying what he thought, but I would bet it wasn't "the City of Wheat Ridge." Another time, I witnessed a frustrated motorist plow into the little cones the church uses to block traffic, and drag them several yards down the street. I didn't blame that driver a bit, although as she raced off toward Youngfield, I wondered how long her road rage would last and whether it would cause other incidents farther up the street. Applewood Baptist Church evidently thinks it is better than everyone else who uses 32"d Avenue. Although I doubt the church pays one cent to help maintain the street, or pay for damage caused by irritated drivers down the road. As you review the permits that would allow the church to expand its operation, I would hope you keep in mind that ABC is not a good neighbor, and in fact, denigrates the feeling and fabric of community along 32nd Ave. Despite any promises they make, they will not be able to prevent traffic problems that come with a significant increase in people trying to use a neighborhood street. If they want to increase their tax-free revenues so much, they should move to an area more suited to large-scale retail traffic. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, 04V-0 Z_ CC 1 /T IS ✓/~'y~/~. .~I/y ~j ~//L~ ~1i`Z Gip ,ZVI 41, ze G ti In Page 1 of I Subject: New Church Building To: <ddeardorff@applewoodbaptist.com> Cc: <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Dear Pastor Deardorff, I am a resident of the Applewood neighborhood in which Applewood Baptist Church is proposing an expansion. I have lived here for 29 years, first on Union St., and now on W. 31St PI. I am following the application process and neighborhood meetings and, of course, am interested in the direction that the neighborhood is heading, as I plan to live here for the rest of my life. I am trying to solicit information so that I can formulate an opinion on whether I am for the proposal or against the proposal. Naturally, I believe that churches are necessary and good, and they serve the needs of a community. I also believe that there certain features and values that make up a quality residential neighborhood, and it is difficult to mix larger commercial uses within the framework of a residential neighborhood. As such, I am concerned as to what the final build out may contain on this residential land. I have seen proposals circulating that indicate a large campus with a second, larger worship center on the North side of 32nd surrounded by buildings and parking closer to the creek where building would not be practical due to flood plain concerns. Similarly, I am also concerned that the proposed educational center will not accommodate your growing needs as a parish. The graphs shown at the community meeting in November seem to indicate that not only are the educational needs growing, but the worship needs are growing as well. It appears that the worship needs are growing in parallel to the educational needs, and are growing very rapidly, more than doubling in five years. As a concerned resident. I'm not sure that the education building will adequately serve the needs of Applewood Baptist Church, and that full development of the land, including a large worship center will be required. It appears that the Education Building is the first step of a much broader plan to develop the entire site, and I'm not sure I believe this fits into the residential framework of the community. Thank You, Jeff Archer Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/4/2004 Jeff, I am sorry I was out of the office and could not answer your e-mail until now. Thank you so much for taking the time and effort to contact me for information on our need for an additional education building and parking on our property on the north side of 32°d Avenue. We have detailed information about our need for the added education building on our web site at www.applewoodbaptist.com - simply click on the "Education Building" icon to access this information. In reference to your question regarding the long term plans for Applewood Baptist Church, we know there are uninformed rumors circulating around this issue. As you know Applewood Baptist Church has been an integral part of this community for over 40 years. The current education building on the north side of 32„ d Avenue has met our needs for approximately 20 years and we anticipate the proposed education building and parking will meet our needs for many more years. Your e-mail mentions another "proposal" being circulated by some of our neighbors regarding the North Property. This can best be addressed by the letter released by the Wheat Ridge Community Development Department which states: "On March 13, 2003, city staff members met with representatives of the church to discuss construction of the new education building. Prior to this meeting, staff had instructed the church to consider long-term build out scenarios and how placement of the education building could affect other future development of the property. Based on the staff's request, the church presented a plan, which showed the education building and a new sanctuary structure for illustrative purposes only. Representation of the new sanctuary structure on the site plan for the education building does not give permission for its future construction. The Community Development department has informed the church that the city would be unwilling to approve the sanctuary structure knowing it would not be built in the near future. Any construction beyond the terms of the application for approval of the new education building would have to be processed as a separate application. The church has acknowledged that their future needs may change." We share concern for retaining a "quality residential neighborhood". I will be happy to address any additional questions or concerns you may have. Thank you again for your thoughts and prayers. Pastor Duffy Deardorff WENDELL PHILLIPS 6885 Oberon Road Arvada, Colorado 80004 - 2969 March 1, 2004 Wheat Ridge City Council Attn: The Honorable Gretchen Cerveny, Mayor 7500 West 29"' Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Subject: Support for the Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application The Honorable Gretchen Cerveny, Mayor I support the granting of Applewood Baptist Church's building permit from the city of Wheat Ridge to build an additional education structure on its property on the north side of 32°d Avenue. Applewood is, and has been an integral part of the community for over 43 years, and is a tremendous asset for the community. Applewood strives to preserve the values of the neighborhood, and work with the neighborhood residents in order for all to achieve what is the most beneficial use of its property in order to accommodate its needs. I have the greatest confidence that you and your fellow council members will realize that it will be the correct decision to grant permission for the Church to proceed with its building project. Thank you, Wendell Phillips ;l ont com- Ridge, won the award: Though LETTERS rk is completed tract, the results iercial applica- and the world. laces we were neighbors to vi- community urge of products Totally against ABC P bianchurches. We even shared OXF ROBERT, th a low profile I am writing to express support of any expansion my; parking spaces'with one of the RO ~e work is Meurer non plans that Apptewood Baptist, ' churches. L have lived two blocks from M1an68saWpndar B The company is ~rldwide through Church might be eonsidering at heir present location. Applewood Baptist Church since The church has had two 1971 president Bush has taken im- porrtant steps to secure our home- ' tent technology. r..... , Traffic noise, safety of chil- ..__r..,,.,.ts . in the malOr building programs, . land induding a new ho neland ~__.._.,.,...r-E,n,vH nn more than few hundred. After the edu an' - SON building was built on the n cide of 32nd Avenue in 191 a` T k- these e JEC fobs in Jeffco. We ex- inc... us year on projects the gas? :conomic developmem corr. talking about for sever- Rid, anpte, the JECand oth- the iavediscussed bringing Bap I firms to Jeffco. ; per re to see high-teehnol- Rid open at the new Ken par _ -_a 4- of c lopmentat some vacain id industrial sites near ounty airport' ' Lions to the innovators id we encourage others eir footsteps. d principal the church is there. I moved tc ras Services, ppplewood because of the nee basedoil and ness of the church and good production Wheat Ridge schools. ;e the Wheat Applewood Baptist Churc o approve known on every continent pplewood as a people who care about t special use world. Church teams have c tat UVlieat ried greetings from the may< urches and a of Wheat Ridge, as well as ' um is the mix the mayors of Lakewood an the residential Arvada, to mayors of nume as of the city. _ t ous cities and provinces aro we purchased a building and moved our offices from lakeside to 4501 Wadsworth Blvd. in 1976. We relocated to 3760 Vance St., in 2000. In both the world. I am' confident rl the city council will fairly at favorably consider the churl application as the church se to grow and server the city, ECEN en masse to the can- the process as much provides an oppor- !ighbors, who more . similar interests. [e get asked to volun- immote the party, but se. . ne phone call to par- 7 find out where the ill be held in a neigh-_ County Republicans 303-277-1113. The reached at 303-237- ialinformation about ,r r lection dates and oth- E"'. ilitical puzzle, call the . Elections Office at ,an all Colgiado', lightning CounaL e _ t iitm i W e traffic and loss of habitat would ' be deuastatin to these an- Ais. g hurhumancaused non; accounting for o vo our, ar w g ce, many concerns regarding the . Our animal friends only have a " all wildfires " l fl proposed expansion of the Applew66 Baptist Church. voice through us The church is proposing holding pponds for [he muniei a at- p t feel the heat that is . Th church currend resents" e y p a icanrtraffic problem on runoff from the parldxrg lo[. which could se a problem for tin aeoPle who know,,, and its potential for es West t 3 3 2nd Avenue. If that traffic in mosquitos and West e ' were doubled or tnple~.or quadrupled it would be ab Nile diseas - . Prospecf Valley Elementary d greening grass dts- e dry climate that is , solutely overwhelming: We are 'School would also be impacted a i d ncemed that thet}ys`commrt-.' exp ns on. bythis propose oisture relief. Those meet to keep 32nd atwo-hire' `Th?se'is talk that the church Foothills are begun- road would be waived in the might consider starting a charter ' rcks of 2002. , public interest if traffic substan- school some day. We are con- re For Service es yailq increased. cemed.the, church would want to took more than• include up to 460 parking and 133 est spaces. The.drainage from this parking lot into the Lena ditch acres burned fn ; would contain substantial amounts ofpollution The as- ct ' have large,o it oor lightirfg, ch ~we feel that their protect want a percent tax increase" rte ; " , which is inappropriate in a resi- would best be built in a nonresi ` for what] Sd Fas?racks can kill . ~r y dential neighborhood. dermal area that has better access: more people? ay There isa considerable,- We ask'that yoit.please deny the: ` BONNIE FERGUSON , ount of wildlife that trues in 'az° Applewood Baptist Chumlrs re ; Lakewood . u. nrc. u r w plans hunch with. uch ;,--,----,7-7r _r r mg their main 'streets and, no life. Adequate facilities are need= , insiori`should locate'tio y t o`get rid'of cheat; tutning . ed to accommodate these ever site zoned for such ac- them into parks., - be their ^ growing needsbecailse it's all , tther than seelang;c* only solution. Parksare won about people ;:Such expansion i wtthiit an R 1 neigh- derfil but they don't generate will enhance the quality of life, ' 3.: Tbis is tonget of . revenixe needed to nm-govern < " not devalue it -The churchs rhood chnzch meat. Jobs are'what is needed ; . many ministries provide hope ad etghbors, we have no ob ' to; boost revenue: Will we look;; comfort to the hutting. It equips lan 'for to the use`of•th back, at thyt point and say, hke,, . all ages, youth and adultiaMm in iaLily homes which % we ace now about 6k-ho, 'order that they can move to generate tax revenue for do we get rid of this eminent gteat- resourcefulness to, our un , Ridge ar an open space domain law? Lets not tie tines mediate airdextended coinin . . _ the neighborhood, but hattds with `right new legislation . f. T `ty hese rovid mmstnes pe'not an exception to R L . Remember TABOR only a meeting place; but;also as for a project of this CHERYL BRumARDT avenue for *pie to serve others, ; vly violates the whole t3'heat Ridge thus contributing to the comirru- f zoning regulation. pity and givltg something bac1C- se do not be swayed by APPM ABR tot Thy tnanq micustries need us of the proposed.ex- I am a resident of District 2 in a.facility in older to furtherieach t,~ 9 v-AiM,,,C Wheat Ride: A rolewood'Bantist out tb'otliets The chrircl exists ' od mg Permit to construct a atuctt a m~ teesent wnat W r~ABOR ad about this years and wanting to irmtt through ~rY m Iraq we fulitess and atiel u rt it to condemn proffer appictate out freedoms We + The Wheal Ridge y ' N'L7 •~y~+ O' N ~ O R. ~y r~ I 0,4 C: 0) r rop'N ~ v oo~a:N 3. it fD q El 1 n RA mm" • n y rv ^ rv~o w Rte., m rv. xrt ~ y G.~~ ,~n r~¢¢pptgh.i ~ C:.p O r zd.z r~N:~sry" ~ - ~ ^ m O ..~yNy~ ~ N N N n OGy N F m H n ~ O ^ 09 7 y ~to p ~..C to 'M• Q•.~o-~ ~ ~.O C.p'.p P• v ~ ~ `G p O .rye n ~ co tra o ~ Div o N 7c Q:y~ O aoHa'. m' o S, o or°o S "h r~HO~:troo a, K c yy p N .Ty+G ^ O CL, 0~, H N y 'cY 'tip ~'.o ~0 (°.oG-O oN ' THURSDAY, MARCH: 11; 2004 WHEAT' R I D G E T R A N S C R I P T Real Estate Today Residents fear expansion will hurt views Impression' Continued from Page I Recent Re/ i hands of this," he said. "We've talked about the church being a good neighbor. I don't see Wheat ' Ridge and Lakewood being good neighbors.- and ask them not to allow the spe- cial use. "I think there's reason to respect the zoning and we can encourage them to do that," he said. Because churches are tax- exempt, the city will not receive any revenue from the church. "I believe it's kind of a wash right now," Klammer said. "I don't think there's an economic argu- ment for the church over the resi- ` dents, or the residents over the~ church." Leanne DiGiacomo along with erri, an organizer of A alks to an Applewood plans to expand its c ertv west of the oroo ny: auri oiru in Jefferson County Realtor@ As some readers will rec by, what I had ' hat learn Z the organization, I de- cided to attend the ' RE/MAX Intema- tional Convention in San Diego last week to be further in spired and moti vated. I was not disappointed. Given its domination of d dastry - over 58,000 agents Photo. by JUSTINIAN HArPiero countries -people are surpri: xl Families for Residential learn that the RE/MAX bra' I about the Applewood Baptist only 31 years old. It was s Perri and her husband, Ralph, right here in the Denver an pansion site. Dave and Gail Linniger and t her husband Dave, owns property their colleagues. Over 5,000 adjacent to the proposal and sug lose a view pf the mountains, "I certainly didn't see a decrease attended the San Diego gested the church may have addi-. . which was the reason that he built in value," Oxford said. which included keynote spe tional plans. his house on the spot 40 years ago. - He also took issue with claims educational sessions and, of c "I think their next step after "We will lose sight of the moun- that people drive from throughout a marketplace with vendors s 'building a building:.: I-think they `tains. That's why we built here," he the metro area to attend services at everything from signs to sol would apply ,for a charter school , said. "I built a back porch just the church. to trucks. application, she said. for that (view)." "Most of our attendance is from Committed as I am to supp A charter school on the site Rohr also built large windows Wheat Ridge and Lakewood," Habitat for Humanity, ,I have would increase already bad traffic, ; `facing west and has a great view of Oxford said. "I think its a part of impressed from "day one" b. the opponents said. the school of Mines M-blem from the community." "I feel like we're speed bumps his living room. Executive Pastor Duffy Dear- in their way," Klainmer said. "George and I, we have a lotto dorff said that three-fourths of the "We are," an audience member ,replied. "You have to keep your lose," he said. ` Eight families live adjacent to church's congregation comes from Lakewood, Arvada, Wheat Ridge 1903 Historic kids in the house on Sundays." the site of the proposed expansion. and Golden. Deardorff also said ' `Ralph and Debbie Perri also If any of those families submit an that the church hopes to submit its s Located in Golden own property adjacent to the pro- objection to the plan to the city, a application for a special use per- 12th Street Historic Dis- posed expansion, and also are : public hearing will have to take , mit in about two weeks. trio this home is well working.to fight it. place before the City Council. Oxford also said that the known to local history, ' "Well, I just think it's too big of - Bob Oxford, one of only two church is looking for new land. buffs. It was the second a commercial-like development for members of the church who at- "We are actively seeking to buy and final home of A residential neighborhood," Ralph tended the meeting, said he came new property," he said. "But I can Golden's pioneer mer- Perri>said. "A church of this size is : to the meeting to hear what. was tell you, its very difficult." chant, George West fine, but it has to be in an appro ?going on. Although he didn't speak Another audience member, (founder of the Golden' priate location.' during the meeting, he took issue who helped defeat a proposal to Transcript). Built in George Hock, whose wife built , with the claims of the church neg- build condominiums where it featured a;, 1902-1903 their home in 19K lives across atively affecting property values. ' Crown Hill Park is located, said , new luxury -indoor the street from the proposed ex- "I've been here since 1971," he ' ' its important to fight the expan- plumbing The lst floor passion. He said if the building is his property will de- constructed My house said after the meeting. . is valued about nine times what it ' sion plans. "If we hadn't fought that bath mom has a claw-foo has ah m , crease in value by about $10,000 was in 1971." fight- we would have had a " , died here No West George The can se until 1920 ho because his view of the mountains Since the '70s, the church big complex over there, very t k . u inal kitchen is now The ori willbelost ill l " has undergone several expansions; id h s to its importan he said. I thin ht this " fi g all the amenities was adde( so w Rohr a Sylvester "Curly a . e . g wood flooring and wood trh the original cast -iron radia. TQYIIY y~l l'a 3 4 THE CENTER FOR PHYSICAL HEALTH home at www.1210lulnoiss IAN t dlx2 Sun Valley Est: worxrn Lu bmuir a Lax would sustain services iture. tentatively call fora 11~L~i quare-foot mall with an possibly a Cabela's out- ire - that would use percent of the space. A is camp also is under % tion, along with a small that the Scouts would oors Brewing Co. would re water. Ji developer sullivanHayes n out an optimistic com- te of sometime in 2005, t the city go slow enough a 'successful project. Its - gin the arduous, yet nec- k of infomring the neigh- the area lan o develo : p t p st 32nd 'Avenue and p ' 70. a scoop of dirt was Col ado Mill th ll or s ma e ood,, land owner and truer Greg Stevenson had ' , UM two -paw of shoes gong LIIU of uieedngs with=neigh inson's approachwas to AWOMB dN1Id16(IIkSt - be a good neighbor and will con- Foothills Art Center, a &naUy rugs until the last voice Editors note. This letter was tinue to do so. recognized facility which brought originally,sent to tree Wheat If Applewood cannot expand . Vance I irkland back to the view eryone: was happy with , Ridge'City. Council and'Mayor to meet its educational needs, we of metro area aficionados (wbich mall plans that brought Gretchen' Ceiveny. r will have to consider selling the resulted in a new museum in x1900,000 square feet When my familycame to o current property and moving to Denver for hrs WOW. the new before it Miners Alley Playhouse the area, burn one they were unaware of Colorad in September 1966, we moved to the APPlewood area another location: Would w. ILlammer pr efer a school or busi- , moved to Golden from Morrison, ping on. and joined Apptewood Baptist ness in his neighborhood? - I was recognized as the finest small ord theater in °Dvby W would be wise to con- Church Although we later moved thank you for your considera- fi Golden s Levinson and his team. the public informed to Arvada; my daughter and I leave remarried members of don in this matter. , VV1LhiA L ROW .,annual Music Fest, bringing , aved the way for a suc- Applewood and attended and ' . va -0a AY togetherm"""an` from around the in support of open country ect. uld be unfair to thrust 0 supported the mmistnes there. smallat that tiriii~ The chiirch was ' ' Id11hC81 00110rAlI lJ ; In the hills, Center Stage is roud home of The responsibility on the thcou the but has ! years I received a copy of the solid- p Evergreen Players, a rec®t repre- nI Iayes has been in the a f a l n i t However It has renamed a good hbor'ta the smaIL co net nntmi tation letter from Mr. Donald ' sentafive of the Rocky Mountain g me or o g t me, a u ry. g Davidoff and his Foothills Music Region to the National Tiieaue rs,-which owns a por- All i a h a et d We,,are,nouraslaugpemnission; ou and the council to ex- from , Festivaland-wishedmmakea' bailed -Festival where theywere ' tre at t s t rg e . hers must work to as- y pond our education , facilities, on few comments. Of the top 10 cultural higlr as the audience choice as one of . their troupe received act0rof the rocs that surprises will the property north:of West 32nd lights:in "Denver,' two - the year' honor. Another resident of er all, the area would" ffle d i or h i "Avenue ;I was in tlfebusiness meeting 30 rars`a o wh Butterfly Pavilion and The Center Stage is The Evergreen. ra an v s t an; s t y g en we ted to'pmrhase'the pro ` Arvada Center are in Jefferson Chorale. Annually, it pmsents two . n vo perty - f t re f County. The Lakewood Cultural . fully staged musicals and two side ts and business have to wait to deter' or u u Pete Iaammet."was quoted in Center has become an important venue for groups like the nation- . choral concerts, often nationally premiering composers works e malt offerings well the Feb 5 rss!te of the Wheat ` ally recognized David Taylor from the region and the country it the surrounding re, , Ridge Trdnunpt assaying, "The Dance Theatre, The Golden Eagle I could continue listing'bets chtrrrh already disrupts the 0th- Brass Band and The Lakewood in the entire cultural community >ible' that the center avian WT esidential feeling of ' Symphony. Farther south in the from dance, tbeaterand music to z well with Mills, the. the, aeig f boyhood." the church> county, The Ascot has become d'mosams mountains and buver- Shopping Center and hashers tribe neighborhood for the home of the Jefferson Youth.. , , flies. Suffice to thatJelferson wn Golden merchants = oveM years I am sure the ` Symphony Edgewater is the Ioca- IPs nothing robe , iossible that Wheat church was xhere ,when Mr' lion for the largest Filipino- ashamed of in terms of ~ ng for the, fences may I~lammer chose to moveao his American Cultural center,,- at oifermgs Lets supportall die , ymber of shoppers fo hick would please the r home . eel that the church add tween Ghicago,and San which has Francisco. Golden t de}iglirs we have ii i h rnments that rely on,z7 s : , totlie gualtty and beauty of the ' , more museums per capita than ng t e Foothill MusidFestival. GEOFFREY WODELL venue to operate, ~ti. yrk(o°d. way I al s tried to Denver, pWit , y hosts The .'r Whew Ridge: K G Five Ws that knowingly would irritate its hi i b ? (M tttea from our etrcuraaua ama; m and we don't attempt to exclude a, waL a~ IV Ycaauauc. aaiua, the other editorial page items, ob w est customers ore on t n a s later column ) those that differ from our own jectivity isn't one of the purposes. tha and an H . Advertising is measured in col- opinions. Another similar group of opin- The other key element on our opinion page is an editorial cartoon. pet wb urnn inches, and more than one lo- cal business has scratched his or ions are what we call guest ' This is an opinion of the cartoonist bu her perplexed head as we attempt - columns. These represent the not of me, not of the company and to explain how we charge for ad- opinion of authorized representa- tive of local causes and organiza- often not of many readers. Our cartoonist for many years has Pn vertising. (T1iaPs also another col- umn at another time tions. If you think of these as more ' been Rob Pudim, a Boulder resident Trt . Lwill attempt to Today though prominent letters, you would be who reads our newspapers and ex- Jeff , , , tackle and explain some opinion ' pretty close. Our company - or more pre- presses his own slant on a local situ- ation. He isn't told what to. draw, 27' dle page terminologies. Let s start with O Chumh adds vWUO to 8= the greater good the church pro- churches removed and isolated to a car H OF Editor's note: This letter was origi- vides to the community that justifies " commercial center or some other ing l Ea1U LE nally sent to the wheat Ridge city Council w its presence and its expansion. While some do not want the place. People of faith have for een- tunes recognized both the value and f h s c tivr s l I hope this letter finds you ell. church in their community, many the attractivenes having hurc - o ta My husband and I have been mem- others do and cherish its presence. es in their communities. Surely the Set bets of Applewood Baptist Church Applewood Baptist Church has been value of a local church to the whole :pie and neighbors of the church com- a valuable and beautiful part of the community and the marry hundreds " munity for about three years. We community of Wheat Ridge for over who worship there outweighs the greatly support the churclPs pTOpos 43 years contributing to the quality -objections of a few al for building an additional educes- of life in the whole area. This is RALPH GRAY ' Imp tion structure on its property. This longer than many local residents Golden building would be located on the north side of West 32nd Avenue in have lived there.: , . The church is first and foremost The bell Is hot - strike now . ho Fn Wheat Ridge. As one of the original a place of worship.and mostcertam- On Monday, the Colorado m buildings in the community, ly'for families. Families want to Supreme Court stepped in to stem Sk Applewood Baptist Church has worship in their community, just as the tide of public theft of private Jut added value to Wheat Ridge by they want community schools. And, property which has been occurring WE both maintaining its grounds in an ' Applewood Baptist Church is dedi-" . in increasing instances by a number :,Ca aesthetically pleasing manner: and sated to preserving and enhancing of municipalities in Jefferson County. jar ritaldrig the area a safer place to re- those values that provide a safe and Non=elected, aggressive urban re- . ' He side for-:over 43. years. The church better place'to live for everyone of ' newal directors and appointed urban, ` -ll membership grown and is in " no faith. all faiths; even those of renewal committees or boards Have ed need of more education, storage, just as the greater community been notorious in disregard rfg the in- he and recreational space. We ask you has grown, so has the church. To retests of the people they have been cle to accept the building proposal as it address its growing needs, and al- sworn to serve- This goes double for ag( will continue to enhance the beauty ready owning the property to do elected officials who have eyes on in- on of the area and the churches needs, so, the church has done extensive creased spending outside of reason Wi " Unfortunately the rocould be property A research and studies with complete, Perhaps it's time for the 102,000 an -1A ..-a t . ~ c Mftivirv ro'the enneerns of the neonleof Arvada to take a good an int may detract from the quirement for ouuamg an aam- pomtea ooaras ana ao a ume neaa The church was estab-` tional education building. After all;. rolling if in order. e many of the current' many of the church's.members are WILLIAM IL ECHELMEYER roved in to the area and local residents. All studies indicate Wheat Ridge e to serve the communf- drat the church has neither out- and in truth. . grown, nor will outgrow in the Reps support renewable enelgy. ze into consideration near future, its presently owned Boyd, . Thank you to Reps-"Betty during the possibility of Property, nor does its growth or D-Lakewood, Rob Fairbanks 1t I process for the building projected growth exceed the South ieffco, Cheri jahp, D-Wheat is the right thing to do. vorctng a ctturcn not to grow un- raxewooa, for tnerr support w _te- ' ND DIANA HOWARD less it leaves a community does not newable, energy: Your >epresena- so dge :=that community. And, as tives' vote in support of HB 127'3 he for those that want no church fn . [ estabhsbing a rgm able energy . - le entwel& ebjecden8 their community ("I wish they standard will Help jumps_ the s dissension often receive would just go' comment) think of , use of wind, solar, an d biomass, and u ttentfon to the darn- what that means to that commuruty; th ' c other renewable energies in rado ' ` " ' `Colo At The Feb. greater good y expresses the objet- rs ommunity across and to every nation if such wishes became maltry As more people move to our trz W lewood Baptist's growth re church's response to Think of the countless images of towns and villages and commumnes' state, well need moreelectricity to °power our homes and businesses. tons, It does not address all across this natioh with the By investing in clean energy now, we ~/-o y I.HTFRS teem nvestigating animal e'allegations , against anch in Golden; we ' kly learned that.' is make it hard to iwner has done any note difficult tb do 41 years and the church has ies inspector said the an asset to the community, n :ring maldng pet~store ` mg the area a safer, and bettei n animals die iri therr ' place to live. Applewood'Bap t now, a sick puppy Church is a necessary part of ore can be thrown in ' community and has been for' reported over 43years♦ put some teeth into The additional building ws ieglect lams.'' ; hold to busting look and feel should be required that it will not deter from the standard of -living to 11 charm of the neighborhood. care. Our legislators 7• MARIE OLIVER and municipal levels Wheat age scussion about mak not only for people, liurch adds to co11 moltye . oral friends. I have been a resident of : r aware n teenage practice events t he so very Lg possibie srup- somedai e facts m, I vould pros an mer's acceptetl ces':. khoolsii essary p; di- those in Ruo church i should 1. efor hood wii he think its u. _I, i r %gig m m S N O LI N O n z N 1T1 Z -a m rnr ~ !m N y ~ y (n z d rt < O C ° H O N f0 O R x N 93. CD D od vry. O~.''d R ~ z G W e X41 THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2004 W H E A T R I D G E T R A N S C R I P T K 1k Neighbors an withp . fan 10 CAPITAL G ittman Continued from Page 1 planned at present. TEDUCED "One of the most misunder- LOW AS 5/o value of having a church in the stood concerns of the evening was After 5/5/03, the capital gneighborhood and we've had a lot related to a supposed final build- people whose other incoa AINS 7,~O-rc--Oprrita- of people that have;written us in out of the property. Pastor. Calvin 15%, gains. or The less maximum only pay aximum tax support of the project, he said.explained that right now, net capital gains after 515103 bas been Also traffic studies have shown the church needs more education reduced to 15%. that the streets are adequate for the space and the only plan being put- See your CPA for the most benefits. church's current and future use. sued, or needed' at this time is the On Nov 18, the church con- building permit to build one edu- ducted a,meeting with neighbors cational building and additional Call for details a to address some of their concerns. parking," the minutes state. 11\ The neighbors were concerned The master plan for the prop- n with a document that the church erty, designed by Architect James 3491 submitted to the Wheat Ridge E: Moorhead and'dated Feb. 24, Planning Department' that shows states that there is a'possibility for more build-out than the church is a two phase build-out. admitting to. "The intent of Applewood They repeatedly denied that Baptist Church is to execute the j~e there was, any master plan, Master Plan in two phases over a C~a~ Klammer said. "They` repeatedly period of 15 years. The first phase jJ asserted this is only one building.( will add another education build- But the site plan that the church ing in one to three years. The sec- submitted to the planning depart and phase will add anew worship ment during its pre-application center in about 10 years after Phase meeting, shows that the church I is completed," the plan states. had planned to build anotherDeardorff said the city asked building, said Wheat Ridge the church to come up with a mas- Community Development Direct- ter plan that showed what could Take advantage of our or Alan White happen in the future. He also reit- SUPER PRESEASON SALE on 'We told them because the con- erated that the church is only plan- struction of the second building J 'ning to build one new building, al- was way in the future we could though he could not comment on only deal with the one structure what might happen 15 years down t under the special use, White said. the road. t i a We would have to do another "We've concluded that it was in 94 a special use for the other building." the best interests of the church and According to minutes from the : city to just pursue one building," meeting posted on the church's We site, only one building is See CHURCH, Page 6 CDWUMil-Y INsTALLEI 'lonces good for model xED4304500 CFM. Cools up to 1,400 sq. R Larger available at sale pnces: Prke applies wNz avenge elecauai connection to existinc not available to residents within the Cdy of Iknver, Broomfieid; or Westminster f GET CONNECTED With i , ORDER _ DURING THIS SALE &PAYJN JULY2004 . ` RYAN AOAM5 a'R .~"VE ALVs"N 'B/1b > 1.fV£pts ~ R5 ^ Fk100Nr.Y CRC+WELL - JOAN BAEZ crY c F RYAN ADAMS RICHARD $IJCK?4ER AKO:'.C JO-t4E CARTER RIZ>eERT CA AY - B-Ao L.Ivsr, CDANNY BA4LNES JOE ELY CAS" CALF-XiCQ. XASEY Ci-t^M gRs Co wecsx JuNkIiES - AL: • A FLATT A"I) SCRIJOCS - BLOCK OW.ENS - RECK;L r: ClI.iGC.E TLrr~s~o Gle.c.rAra ~/B;~c~a Sri.L Mcsiar T4WNES VAN ZANOT' Tim O`BReEtzt SLAaG IefKLF..9isxuc..nRn... 1.:z.-.. er N~GEL THURSDAY,FEBRUARY 5,2004 'W. H E A T -~R I D G-E T R A"N S C R I P T ■ HOME IS tEMAIN... e eying o 8 E seals :nrs ]IN fii na ST '_{llWw'sn. 'VJ1.WVEri.w-.r,-- c h the chumb success, i al Continued from Page 5 s w s ccess and growth and pros- Deardorff said. While the church sees the ex- hbor- i su i believe the church is pefdy, ood thing, but th" are g V pan 'on as bettering the ne d ~rnmer sees it another way Golden h n Rd ld doing a g on a scale that is doing this e oo ` 17535 S. Go 303.278.0363 °Iviost of the neighbors who ested here and P at N i ial activity. more like eommerc nv S 0,eouPO built here, yyyyWA _ uilasmexres.COm moved here did so with some un derstandingthat this would remain Pete Klammer Church. neighbor a residential neighborrhood,'0 a institutional one, laammer, said " he said. boyhood c- ..da the church success, , dents who live around t dvisory Board as it host mmunity. Department of ve made in 2003 in clean' 1 cess hr belie 1 thin scab acts fats closure Project chi aiser-Hill Manager's th >er nuclear weapons the its ton the progress: t o P k ca wth and prosperity. I The res hurch'is doing a good the church are worried that the toy are doing this on a battle will come down to money more like commercial and public relations. In responsE mor more l added. to: a nailing that the church sen „ t ..,,tips collaborate( ten the request ru, a >e to expand came forth, th ccording to 'Klammer, pt the neighbors to feel K 1111 . I IX were misled. ' o le hear I think sometimes pe p what they want to hear and plans f, can mange," he said for I<iammer said he, carit speak all the neighbors but would like to a see the church go. ,Ideally 1 would like to see the church find a more suitable loca- tan relations attei said. net also said the is concerned that 1- the ;n need to go for ncil." 'MAR-04-2004 THU 03:23 PM REMAX 100 FAX NO. 3032326919 P, 02 Applewood Families for Residential Values b=: / /www-AFRV.org - E-mai1:AFRV@bigf6ot.com P.O.Box 2013 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034-2013 February 26, 2004 Dear Neighbor: Change is inevitable - but your choices can affect the outcome. It is time to decide what kind of changes you want Are you going to let a big non-profit institution. take over your neighborhood? You may know that Applewood Baptist Church (ABC) at 32ad Avenue and Quail is planning to expand, yet again. Several mailings might have reached you from ABC, stating their construction plans, ABC would like you to believe they are only adding ` just one" 28,000 sq.ft. building to the north (Wheat Ridge) side of their property. But in the documentation they submitted at their pre-application meeting with Wheat Ridge Community Development on March 13, 2003, ABC specifically states, `The intent of Applewood Baptist Church a to execute the Adaster Plan in two phares. The first phare vdll add another 28,000 sq. ft. education budlding...The second phase add add a new 31,000 sq. ft. worrhip center... after Phase I it complete. The worship center cis currently projected to seat 1,840 parishioners." See the enclosed copy of the site-plan drawing`- In fact, their own Long Range Planning committee, in a report to the Church dated March 17, 2002, stated that with their current projections of growth, they would reach the capacity of the Wheat Ridge property before the end of the decade. Then what? Such "mega" church expansion is an excessive industrialization of this residential area - that's why it's zoned "R-1", and that's why ABC is forced to use the "special use" permit process to get an exception to the zoning. But there are better locations for big churches. PLEASE HELP US FIGHT TO KEEP YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD YOURS. We are a grass- roots neighborhood group of concerned families called Applewood Families for Residential Values (AFRV). If you join with us, together we can be effective with coordinated effort It is very important to maintain solidarity in opposition to these excessive expansion plans. You may respect the mission of Applewood Baptist Church, but this is not a "neighborhood church;" it needs a more commercial location. So much office buildings, parking lots, lighting, asphalt, activity and traffic will irreversibly degrade your neighborhood values, as well as your quality of life - forevet! The church has said they intend to file permit application papers in March. From that point on, everyone has to act fast, show up, speak out, and be counted, if any opposition is going to be heard. We are organizing a "town meeting" with feeling - to explain the process and team up: AFRV COMMUNITY RALLY Prospect Valley Elementary School March 8th from 6:30-8:30 PM. Come make a difference - for your neighborhood - with your neighbors! MAR-04-2004 THU 03:24 PM REMAX 100 FAX NO. 3032328919 P. 03 -2- February 26, 2004 What else can you do? Contact City Counclll Write, call, or c-mail the Wheat Ridge & Lakewood City Representatives with your concerns about noise, child safety, scenic view, wildlife habirat, loss of open space, pollution, and traffic congestion. Explain how you think this will degrade our residential values. All Wheat Ridge representatives can be written at the follow addtess: (Name of City Council Representative) City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Ave- Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. ladividual Laity Council members phone and e-mail addresses are as follows: Karen Adams (303) 231-1391 - voice mail klap@concastnet Mike Stites (303) 423-8360 - home &I_IeCo and com Jerry DiTulho (303) 237-4806 - home JeuyDiTullio@comcast.net Dean Gokey (303) 231-1396 - voice mail Meredith Reckert, Sr. Planner planning & Zoning Division (303) 235-2848 (303) 234-5924 - fax Karen A. Berry (303) 231-1397 - voice mail (603) 954-0479 - Fax khberry26(a botmail.cotrr Wanda Sang (303) 431-8390 -home Sangjw@aoLcom Larry Schulz (303) 736-9182-home councilor5chulz@a comcastnet Lena Rotola (303) 200-9780 - fax You are needed: your time, your energy, your attention, your concern. Find out more at http://www.AFRV.org 'Released by Whcat Ridge Community Development with the following caveat- "On March 13,200% city staff members met with representatives of the church to discuss construction of the new education building. prior to this mcttiog, staff had instructed the church to consider long-tam build out scenarios and how placement of the education building could affect other future development on the pmperty. Based on staff's request, the church presented a plan, which showed the education building and a new sanctuary structure for illustrative purposes only Representation of the new sanctuary structure on the site plan for the education budding does not give permission fox its future construction. The Community Development department has informed the church that the city would be unwilling to approve the sanctuary structure knowing it would not be built in the near fume. Any construction beyond the terms of the application for approval of the new education building would have to be processed as a separate application. The church has acknowledged that their future needs may change. Questions regarding the City's special use permit process should be addressed to the Community Development department at 303-235-2848." 'Never miderexeamate the power of a small, de&,tsledgroup of people to change the worI4- indeed, that it the only thing that ever bar. " - Margaret Mead MAR-04-2004 THU 03;24 PM REMAX 100 FAX NO. 3032326919 R 04 PRESERVE YOUR RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ! Applewood Families for Residential Values (AFRV) is responding, on behalf of Wheat Ridge & Lakewood neighbors, regarding the so-called "facts" circulated by the Applewood Baptist Church (ABC) in their recent mailings. To learn more, see website http://www,AFItV.org. App/ewood Baptist "fact".' the only plan being pursued is the building permit to build one educational building and additional parking. "[Letter, December 78, 20031 ➢ REALITY: That is only PHASE I of the ABC Master Plan, prepared by architect James E. Moorhead, as presented to Wheat Ridge on March 13, 2003% PHASE H will add a new Worship Center, with "3T;000 square feet reserved for this purpose." (ABC's Master Plan) The "28,000 square foot addition to their existing 16,000 sq. ft. building on the north side of 32nd" is just the first step in this Master Plan: App/ewood Baptist "fact".' We will be adding 190 additional parking spaces." [Color postcard "Just the Facts? ➢ REALITY: Only 190 parking spaces in PHASEI, but 460 more will be added in PHASE U. And with worship continuing in Lakewood, and even more parking in Wheat Ridge, 32nd Avenue pedestrian crossing congestion gets worse and worse. App/ewood Baptist `fact".' We are not planning to change our hours of operation" ["just the Facts" color postcard) ➢ REALITY: Plans can change, can't they? Listen to this quote from tape of the November 18, 2003 neighborhood meeting: Q: How many days a week, or days a month, or hours of operation you would be willing to sign up to a restriction against? A: "Can't do that. Absolutely. The First Amendment gives us the right to worship as we feel we need to." Even if that's seven days aweek. Absolutely. App/ewood Baptist "fact°- "we not only want to improve our church, but to do all we can to improve our community as a whole." ["Report from the Long Range Planning Committee J ➢ REALITY: The "community" has had no say in these so-called "improvements," because they are actually degradations of your residential values: more noise, more traffic, more hazards for your children. If the Church succeeds with their schemes, your neighborhood will never be the same. This is not the right kind of location for a metro- regional non-profit enterprise of such scale. According to their March 131h, 2003 meeting with the Wheat Ridge Community Development Department, their "congregation is approximately 3,000 people (only 1,600-1,800 are resident)." We are very concerned that almost half of their congregation is not even frqm Wheat Ridge and Lakewood, making this. a "mega" church/campus, not a neighborhood church. What kind of "improvements" are Wal'Mart-sized parking lots polluting the habitat of Lena Gulch? Multi-story office buildings blocking views of the Rocky Mountains are not "community improvements." This land is zoned "R-1" for a reason: the "R" stands for "residential!" " Available from Wheat Ridge Community Development Department, or view online at http;//www.AFRV.or9 MAR-04-2004 THU 03;24 PM REMAR 100 L w CD CD N m 9 0 0 CD w m 7 FAR NO. 3032326919 P. 05 L Nancy L. Warton, MA 4407 Teller St A-1 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 February 26, 2004 The Honorable Gretchen Cerveny Mayor Wheat Ridge City Council 7500 W. 29' Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Subject: Support for the Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application The Honorable Gretchen Cerveny, I would like to give my support to the application of a building permit for Applewood Baptist Church to build an additional education structure. I have been a part of the Wheat Ridge community since 1977 as an employee of Lutheran Medical Center for fifteen years and now a resident for three years. l have attended Applewood Baptist Church since 1975 and have participated in many events held at the church that have supported the community. At Applewood, we have reached out to Wheat Ridge residents in need with our clothing bank and food distribution. We have held a Woman's Health Fair recently where screenings for health issues were free to the community. We have had support groups for Divorce and Loss Recovery where more members of the Wheat Ridge community attended than Applewood members. We continue to serve the community with other support groups and community events. 1 have been proud of the contrubution to the neighborhood that we have made through the counseling programs at the church. In order to continue these free programs and begin others, Applewood Baptist Church needs to expand the facilities. Realizing there is an impact to the neighbors in regard to parking and noise, we have limited our meetings for these groups to Sunday and Wednesday evenings or during the day when parking is less of an issue. These services to the community, that do not require tax dollars to support, add to the many reasons that you and your fellow council persons should look favorably on Applewood's application for expansion . Thank you in advance for your consideration. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sin Nan y L.. WLMA Cc-. Dean Gokey Wanda Sang February 24, 2004 Wheat Ridge City Council Attn: The Honorable Mike Stites 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 SUBJECT: Much Needed Educational Building Permit for Applewood Baptist Church The Honorable Mike Stites, This request for support comes to you as one citizen who has been a member of the Wheat Ridge/Lakewood communities and member of the Applewood Baptist Church family for over forty years. In the sixties we gathered to worship in the little chapel on the east side of the church property, with less than 100 people on the roll. Today in 2004, our membership has grown to approximately 1,500 and the existing sanctuary can acco- mmodate only 750. We need to be able to utilize the property on the north side of West 32nd Avenue, as was intended in the churchs' long-range plan. (Long before developers were allowed to build numerous residences along the eastern boundary). The need for more educational, recreational and storage space is apparent. Extensive work has been conducted with consulting and research experts in traffic, lighting, parking and landscaping for the proposed addition with the concerns of the community uppermost. The proposed addition would mirror the existing education- al building, creating harmony and balance. The church is dedicated to preserving the values of the neighborhood, just as it did when the property was purchased in the 60's. The goal of Applewood Baptist Church has never been to grow the membership in numbers, but to obey God's commandment "to love one another". Respectfully, Mrs. Arie M. Verrips 12621 W. Dakota Dr. Lakewood, CO 80228 cc: Mayor Gretchen Cerveny k' Council Person: Karen A. Berry Jerry DiTullio Dean Gokey Wanda Sang Karen Adams Lena Rotola Larry Schulz Wheat Ridge, Colorado February 20, 2004 Mayor Gretchen Cerveny 7500 West 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, Colorado SUBJECT: Support for the Applewood Baptist Church budding permit application. I have been a resident of Wheat Ridge for the last 10 years and was privilaged to meet you at one of the Wheat Ridge Women's Club luncheons. I am writing today to ask your support for the application for a building and parking lot for the Applewood Baptist Church. This building and parking lot will be on the north side of 32nd ave.It will be an addition to the building that is already there and will be of the same structure . There are no residences in that area and the new buildings will add to , not detract from, the community. The church is so crowded for class rooms and parking spaces that they have changed their schedule to two Sunday Schools and three worship services on Sunday morning to alleviate the parking and class room problems. The church would be using these facilities mainly for Sunday mornings. It is the churches thought to be good neighbors to the community and add to the beauty of the area. I sincerely seek your approval for this application. Sincerely yours, Marjorie Marie Barnes 3630 Vance Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 February 23, 2004 Wheat Ridge City Council Attn: The Honorable Mayor Gretchen Cerveny 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 SUBJECT: Support for the Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application. The Honorable Mayor Gretchen Cerveny: As a member of your District and the community for over 46 years, I would to express my support for Applewood Baptist Church's pursuit for a building permit from the City of Wheat Ridge to build an additional education structure on its property on the north side of 32nd Avenue. The opinion of some of the neighbors interviewed does not express the opinion of the majority of the neighbors. Applewood Baptist Church is an asset to the Community. The additional building would hold to existing look and feel so that it will not defer from the charm of the neighborhood. The Church is dedicated to preserving the values of the neighborhood. I hope that you and your fellow council persons will take these points into consideration during the application process. I am confident that after reviewing all information you will see, as many of the neighbors have, that granting permission for the additional education building will not defer from the neighborhood, and would be the correct thing to do. Sincerely, Marie Oliver 2690 Reed Court Wheat Ridge CO 80033 co,®o 05, d°~ua-a-EO ~C~a/s r DATE I /l z jet - /h G Z ems` ~~v Zcre z~ C` c pr-c-, ~CC-Z'L C~ . c z ~c (vz C-(h~~ c~ o0 PREPARED BY PACE Page 1 of 1 Kathy Field From: MileyP@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 5:49 PM To: kfield@ci.wheatridge.co.us Subject: Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION (via K. Field) My wife and I are residents of Arvada, but are members and regular attenders of Applewood Baptist Church, and also we are frequent patrons of businesses in Wheat Ridge. We would like to express our support for Applewood Baptist Church's pursuit of a building permit from the City of Wheat Ridge to build an additional education structure on its property north of 32nd Avenue. The church is growing. It has approximately 1500 members that are regular attenders, but the present education building will accommodate only 750. For over 43 years, Applewood Baptist Church has been a good nonprofit corporate "citizen" of Wheat Ridge, and an asset to the community. One needs only to look at the news each day to see the need for an influence in every community to encourage standards for safety, security, and morality. The church property was purchased prior to the time many of the neighbors moved into the area, and will continue to represent a certain amount of "open space." In the unfortunate event the permit is not granted, the Church may need to explore other options, which may include selling the property to a school, or a real estate developer. It is our humble belief that granting the permit may represent many more "pluses" than "minuses" to the Wheat Ridge community. Thank you for your consideration of our views. Robert and Miley Palmer 6673 W. 66th Avenue Arvada, CO 80003 303-4224387 2/18/2004 February 17, 2004 MAYOR Gretchen Cerveny 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, Co 80033 Subject: Support for the Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application Dear Madam: As a member of Applewood Baptist Church and the community for 30 years, I would like to express my support for Applewood Baptist Church's pursuit for building permit from the City of Wheat Rudge to build an additonal education structure on its property on the north side of 32nd Avenue. The church is growing and needs more education, storage and recre- ation space. current membership is 1500 and the current educ- ational facility can only accommodate 750. For over 43 years, Applewood Baptist Church has been an asset to the community making the area safer and a better place to live. The church has been a part of the community and purchased the land on the North side of 32nd Avenue prior to the time in which many of the current neighbors moved to our area. When making decisions that affect the area, Applewood Baptist Church is dedicated to preserving the values of the neighborhood. The ad- ditional building would hold to the existing look and feel so that it will not deter from the existing charm. I hope that you and the City Council will take these points into consideration during the application process. I am confident that after reviewing all information you will see, as many of the neighbors have, that granting permission for the additional education building is the right thing to do. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, p I J Mrs. Pauline Edwards 7035 Owens St. Arvada, CO 80004-1314 February 12, 2004 Wheat Ridge City Council Attn: Mayor Gretchen Cerveny 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 SUBJECT: Support for the Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application Honorable Mayor and Members Of The Wheat Ridge City Council. As a resident of the greater Wheat Ridge community I am expressing my support for the Applewood Baptist Church's pursuit of a building permit from the city of Wheat Ridge to build an additional education building on its property on the north side of 32"d Avenue. My wife and I are members of Applewood Baptist Church and have had an association with the church for over 34 years. Though we are not currently residents of the city of Wheat Ridge, our two oldest children grew up on Vivian Street near the church and attended Wheat Ridge High School. We currently reside near the edge of both Wheat Ridge and Lakewood, but our lives remain centered in the Applewood Baptist Church and the Wheat Ridge community. Applewood Baptist Church has been a valuable and beautiful part of the community of Wheat Ridge for over 43 years contributing to the quality of life in the whole area. This is longer than many local residents have lived in either Wheat Ridge or Lakewood. Our church is dedicated to preserving and enhancing those values that provide a safe and better place to live for everyone. In addition, through its ministry teams that go every few months to serve in many different foreign countries, both national and international recognition is given to the city of Wheat Ridge through these activities of the Church. The Church now has critical growth needs for more educational space as membership has grown to almost twice the size that current space and facilities will accommodate. Moving to address these needs, and already owning the property to do so, our church has done extensive research and studies with complete sensitivity to the concerns of the community to satisfy every requirement for building the additional education building. Without additional educational space, the Church will be forced to either not accommodate those who wish to worship there or move to another location. Forcing a church not to grow unless it leaves a community, as a few in the community want, does not improve that community. Communities grow homes and businesses and schools. We believe that churches should be part of that equation and grow also. Certainly for many reasons there are negative voices to church growth in any community but surely the value to the whole community and the many hundreds that worship there out-weighs those objections without substance of a few. We urge you to consider these points and based on positive reasons grant the building permit for the Church to build the new educational building. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration and please do not hesitate to contact me to address any concerns you may have about my comments. Sincerely, Ralph Gray 864 Braun Court Golden, CO 8040 Phone: 303/274-9371 E-mail: Copies to: Gretchen Cerveny, Mayor Karen A. Berry Jerry DiTullio Dean Gokey, Mayor Pro Tem Wanda Sang, Council President Karen Adams Mike Stites Lena Rotola Larry Schultz Crown Mill and Casework, Inc. P.O. Box 5148 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 (303) 233.4483 January 29, 2004 Mayor Gretchen Cerveny and Wheat Ridge..Cdty„Counc' 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application Honorable Mayor Cerveny and City Council Members: As a business owner operating from Wheat Ridge, and as a former neighbor of Applewood Baptist Church, I write in support of the church's request for a building permit for additional educational space. The church is a welcome "fixture" on 32nd Avenue. Its buildings and grounds are attractive and well-kept, contributing favorably to the overall atmosphere and updated look of the Applewood area. As Applewood and Wheat Ridge businesses thrive, they often require expanded space. I'm thinking of Walgreens and King Soopers and their recent expansions. Homeowners in the area are continually updating, remodeling, even adding to their property and/or structures, as they deem necessary to maintain the value and usefulness. It seems that the thriving church should also be able to make the best use of its property, particularly when the community is enhanced by such an investment. I hope you will grant the church's request for a building permit. Thank you for allowing me to voice my support. Yours truly, Steven . Mc , endry e President :sm 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 December 23, 2003 To Whom It May Concern: The City of Wheat Ridge This memorandum is in regard to the pending application by Applewood Baptist church for approval of a special use permit to allow construction of an education building on Residential-One zoned property at 11200 West 32nd Avenue. On March 13, 2003, city staff members met with representatives of the church to discuss construction of the new education building. Prior to this meeting, staff had instructed the church to consider long-term build out scenarios and how placement of the education building could affect other future development on the property. Based on staff's request, the church presented a plan, which showed the education building and a new sanctuary structure for illustrative purposes only. Representation of the new sanctuary structure on the site plan for the education building does not give permission for it's future construction. The Community Development department has informed the church that the city would be unwilling to approve the sanctuary structure knowing it would not be built in the near future. Any construction beyond the terms of the application for approval of the new education building would have to be processed as a separate application. The church has acknowledged that their future needs may change. Questions regarding the City's special use permit process should be addressed to the Community Development department at 303-235-2848. 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 3031235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 December 18, 2003 To Whom It May Concern: The City of Wheat Ridge tKd' pp This memorandum is in regard to the pending application by Applewood Baptist church for approval of a special use permit to allow construction of an education building on Residential-One zoned property at 11200 West 32"d Avenue. On March 13, 2003, city staff members met with representatives of the church to discuss construction of the new education building. Prior to this meeting, staff had instructed the church to consider long-term build out scenarios and how placement of the education building could affect other future development on the property. Based on staff's request, the church presented a plan, which showed the education building and a new sanctuary structure for illustrative purposes only. Representation of the new sanctuary structure on the site plan for the education building does not give permission for it's future construction. The Community Development department has informed the church that the city would be unwilling to approve the sanctuary structure knowing it would not be built in the near future. Any construction beyond the terms of the application for approval of the new education building would have to be processed as a separate application. The church has acknowledged that their future needs may change. Questions regarding the City's special use permit process should be addressed to the Community Development department at 303-235-2846. C I - Ex= F°7nar'-aynpamo-rFmr ._--rtrrar`~a I ,1 : + 1+ 1 \x11 + + 1 1 1 II 1 \ ~ 1 11 + 111 1 11 I 1 111 ; \I l1 l i1 b1 + + 1 l . 11 1 1111 + \1 1 b Y la o p ~ T-S3~nZAT16gP-or~n~a~--rr~crrc- - LARK[ T b cars--_ ~ nD cml &gi~r 1IE ]A IER PL1i~L James E. Moor head . ~l~--~iZC.R- Architects - Planners .E~T__ 3liY_EI1U E QfORa~Q 9731 Cypress Point Circle Phone ,v.eT fnn ^1196 fi31 7A0-AOAA F1 I Y SITE PLAN ~e K Y 10 . p. James E. Moorhead weC~0e~p1 ~01 ee, Architects - Planners 9731 Cypress Point Cimle Phone oaotrieol Engineer LauTnu, CO 801:4 (303) 790-8065 1 ~ 11 , SITE MASTER PLAN APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CPURCH 11200WEST 32nd AVENUE WI4EAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 Date:l-300 02, Sheet No. DrwnJQ,tp MRIA Chkd: of Job No.0106 of December 18, 2003 Dear Neighbor, Applewood BAPTIST CHURCH I~ On Tuesday, Nov. 18, Applewood Baptist Church hosted a community meeting for our members, neighbors and community to discuss our plans for the best course of action to accommodate the growth of our church. The purpose of the meeting was to present the facts behind the project, dispel rumors and inform the community of our plan to pursue a building permit from the city of Wheat Ridge, which would allow for an addition to the education structure on our property on the North side of 32°d Avenue. It has come to our attention that incorrect information is circulating in the community. It is our goal to communicate the facts behind our plan and to dispel any rumors you may have heard. One of the most misunderstood concerns voiced during the November meeting was related to a supposed final "build-out" of the property. We explained that the church needs more education space and the only plan being pursued is the building permit to build one educational building and additional parking. Last year, Applewood formed the Long Range Planning Committee (LRPC) to begin the process of research and analysis needed to determine the best course of action to address the needs of the church. After much time, research and effort, the LRPC concluded that obtaining a building permit for our Wheat Ridge property is the best plan. The building plan is for one additional education building and 190 additional parking spaces to help minimize church parking on neighborhood streets. The proposed building addition will be the same height as the existing building with the same architectural design. A great deal of landscaping will be added to the property, and a lighting plan will seek to be sensitive to the adjacent neighbors. Traffic, parking, landscaping, lighting, drainage and architectural studies have been conducted, and will assist in developing the space in a way that will add to the value of our neighborhood - not detract from its existing charm. Information from the LRPC is available to you on our website. Simply visit www.applewoodbaptist.com and click on the Long Range Planning Committee Update link. This site mill be continually updated with information about our plan. Direct any questions or comments to Executive Pastor, Duffy Deardorff at (303) 232-9575, ext. 23 or via email to ddeardorff@applewoodbaptist.com. Sincerely, Dr. Calvin Wittman, Pastor Enclosures: Report from the Long Range Planning Committee Map of Applewood Baptist Church Wheat Ridge Property 11200 W. 32nd Avenue 4 Wheat Ridge; CO 80033 * Phone 303-232-9575 • Fax 303-238-2513 Figa T December 10, 2003 Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Applewood Baptist Church Our File No. 2269.00 Dear Ms. Reckert: v 1, MICHAEL J. NORTON mjnorton@bfw-law.com Just a short note to express my thanks and appreciation for your professional courtesy this morning in taking time from an obviously busy schedule to meet with Pastor Wittman, Pastor Deardorf, Dave Floyd, and me on the important plans of Applewood Baptist Church. As we committed, we intend to pursue this process in the most professional manner possible. With that in mind, if, during the next few months, you or other members of the professional staff have comments or suggestions which will help us achieve our goals, we will be most grateful if you would feel free sharing those comments or suggestions with us. Again, my thanks for your professional courtesy. We look forward to working with you. Sin erely, Michael 7. Norton For the Firm cc: Pastor Deardorf BURNS FICA & WILL P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAw 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 1030 • Englewood, CO 80111 • P: 303 796 2626 • F: 303 796 2777 • www.btw-law.com ~y G F""' 2~vi7 +z*T 1~~6^~ In To: Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Fwd: Applewood Baptist Church I think this is yours. Darin X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.1 Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:03:41 -0700 From: "Kate Polesovsky" <KPolesov@denver.lib.co.us> To: <darinm@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Applewood Baptist Church Page 1 of 1 Recently, I learned the Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a 1790 seat worship center, an educational building, welcome center, nursery some other buildings and a additional 650 space parking lot. Applewood Baptist Church is already quite large for the neighborhood impacting traffic on 32nd specifically on Wed and Sunday. The idea of adding more traffic to 32nd is unheard of. There is a neighborhood elementary school around the corner from the proposed addition and a neighborhood pool a block away. High school traffic from Wheat Ridge to Applewood Village for lunch poses enough of a danger to the neighbors trying to navigate 32nd. Please do not consider this development request. Thanks kate ps if you are not the appropriate employee feel free to forward this to the appropriate department. Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith @ci.wheatridge.co.us> 12/10/2003 In Page 1 of 1 To: "Meredith Reckert" <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Mere, FYI. Alan -----Original Message----- From: Dick Matthews [mailto:dick@cpa3.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:11 AM To: Adams, Karen Cc: Berry, Karen; DiTullio, Jerry; Gokey, Dean; Sang, Wanda; Schneider, David; Wise, Cheryl; Young, Randy; White, Alan Subject: Applewood Baptist Karen, That was a very informative meeting at the church last night. There maybe a legislative opportunity. It appears that many of the neighborhood problems are because the parking for the church is located across a busy street. The required parking should be within 300 feet of the facility and not separated from the facility by a collector or busier street. In this case I am not sure a pedestrian bridge like up at Faith Bible would work. If were going to church with small children or older folks I would park in the Lakewood neighborhood rather than cross 32nd or even cross a pedestrian bridge. Random thoughts: The ACLU could have a field day with the mix of religion and City policy. I am very glad the meeting was held in Lakewood:) At some future time this would make a good study session topic. Pete Klammer has still not learned that overstating his case impairs credibility. Lakewood Councilor Wise showed courage and wisdom with her comments about civility. Thanks, Dick Matthews Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 11/19/2003 3:5511)14A u jt-Ffo3 FROM 1 HE OFFICE OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: O Planning: 303-235-2846 O Zoning: 303-235-2851 O Building: 303-235-2855 CinJ QF kf7 /Lid I A? f ~ dl~C ~L'uti%crrrfid J Ate 7501) W. 29t_ • Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Fax: 303-235-2857 • Web Site: www.ci.wheatridge.co.us FROM f HE OFFICE OF H4 E PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: O Planning: 303-235-2846 O Zoning: 303-235-2851 O Building: ~ 30~3~-2~35-28~55~j i2~ T~ ~ ~v~~ (VV~I • 6)Z Fwd y~~ ~ of GC~~/2t/J 7500 W. 29th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, o 80215 Fax: 303-235-2857 • Web Site: www. i.wheatrid ~B'Lv~'ZPJ-~2Zp GUl,7~y~A~ c are ~3 December 26, 2003 Kimary Marchese 10400 W 38' Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 kimarym@iuno.com (720) 422-3633 Concerned Neighbors P.O. Box 2013 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-2013 Dear Concerned Neighbors: fem. --9~ ~oT ~oV-N~ I received your letter postmarked November 15, 2003. I was unable to attend the meeting on November 18. I do not attend Applewood Baptist and don't know what conclusions were drawn that day but would like to make a few observations. Many years ago I was involved in a similar situation with a large church in Denver. They owned adjacent land and as they grew they wanted to pave additional parking. Some of the neighbors, just as in our neighborhood, objected. They used many of the same arguments that were voiced in your letter. This is what happened with that church. Some hard feelings were created because of the manner in which the neighbors addressed their issues, however, eventually the church was able to pave the parking and create the building addition. They tried to address neighborhood concerns as best they could despite the mean spirited way they had been addressed during the debates. Much later a smaller church moved in and that land was sold off and a developer put homes on it. Now, instead of a little traffic at brief off-peak hours, the on going density of that area has been permanently increased. The traffic that those new residents contributed was added to peak daily commuting hours, instead of a little on Sunday Mornings and Wednesday nights. The neighborhood was not more "safe" because churches statistically make neighbor- hoods safer than are neighborhoods without churches. In the end people adjusted-even to the new homes. Also, with the Denver church, allowing them an extra parking lot decreased, not increased, on street parking. Change can be difficult. Even good changes, can be challenging adjustments. Anytime one trades the "already known" for an "un-known'there is some unsettling feeling involved. What I contend is that change is inevitable, whether we embrace it or not. I think that having a strong church in the neighborhood is a positive thing and if we don't allow them to use the land that they purchased many years ago, for the purpose for which they purchased it, for the purpose for which they have been paying the taxes and maintaining and insuring it all these years that it could be unfair. And worse, we may find this property eventually sold and used for something more problematic than a church if our neighborhood climate makes that land unsuitable for a church. I'd prefer brief periods of congestion on Sundays to the kind of never ending traffic 38th has. As a community I would wish to see us embrace this inevitable change and work nicely with these people so that our legitimate concerns can be addressed and hopefully somewhat accommodated. I am hoping that your group of "Concerned Neighbors" and the "Applewood Baptist Representatives" come to a mutually beneficial compromise on this. Every time I have driven by that church it seems beautifully maintained and they appear to be conscientious good neighbors. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can contribute or assist in any way. Sty\ ~elYq n ~,IW I km&,4~ February 28, 2004 The Honorable Gretchen Cerveny Mavor 7500 W. 29d, Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application Dear Honorable Mayor Cerveny: I have been a resident of Wheat Ridge since April, 1965. In addition to my residence, I own 3 other properties within the city of Wheat Ridge. I strongly support the application of Applewood Baptist Church for a building permit for the purpose of increasing the educational structure located on the north side of W. 32nd Avenue. I travel W. 32nd Avenue regularly and have always admired the neatly maintained grounds and buildings at Applewood Baptist Church. Traveling west from 32nd and Kipling, the view of the church steeple and the surrounding area with the backdrop of the mountains is like a beautiful countryside picture. One area resident, Pete Klammer, wrote a letter to the editor of the Transcript citing Applewood Baptist with "disruption and infringement on the neighbors' expectations." I would like to respond to Mr. Klammer's comments. Yes, during services and special events there are cones in the street and men directing traffic while wearing flourescent jackets and carrying flashlights, but they are there for the safety of those crossing the street and they do their jobs without making noise or causing disruption. This is absolutely the same as school children crossing with the aid of safety guards carrying stop signs and as of late, wearing safety jackets as well. I would guess that many residents opposing the expansion of the church building purchased their homes after the church was built and certainly were aware that the vacant ground owned by the church might possibly be utilized for future church growth and expansion. This factor should have been a major consideration in making their purchase decision. I live in close proximity to Wheat Ridge High School. We built our home after the high school was built. We were fully aware that there would be noisy teenagers, screeching cars, bands practicing, and many evening events taking place. We were also very aware that there was a possibility that the school might someday expand. With these facts in mind, we weighed the pros and cons and still elected to accept these conditions because schools and churches are a necessary part of any community. If those in opposition objected to a church in the area, perhaps they should have chosen a neighborhood without a church nearby. I think ifs wonderful that the church is growing and has a need for additional space to provide instruction to adults and children in the ways of righteousness. Through this instruction, it is our mission to enhance and enrich our society and community. Sincerely, Rosemary Isbell 3375 Garland Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 February 16, 2004 Wheat Ridge City Council ATTN: The Honorable Gretchen Cerveny, Mayor 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 SUBJECT: Support for the Applewood Baptist Church Building Permit Application The Honorable Gretchen Cerveny, We have been members of your community for over 10 years, and we would like to urge you to grant Applewood Baptist Church a building permit from the City of Wheat Ridge so that they can build an additional education building on its property on the north side of 32nd Avenue. We believe this permit should be granted for the following reasons: 1. Applewood Baptist Church has existed in the community for over 40 years, and they purchased this land on the north side of 32nd Avenue many years before many of the current neighbors moved into the area. 2. Because of the Church's growth, it needs more space for education, recreation and storage. They only have enough education space for half of their current membership. 3. The Church wants to preserve the values of the neighborhood, not take away from them, and the additional education building will be consistent with the current building's look and feel. 4. The Church has conducted research and consulted with experts in the areas of traffic, parking, landscaping and lighting to make sure that their new building is in line with the concerns of the neighbors and the community. The new education building will be consistent with the current building's look and feel. 5. Because of the Church's growth, if the permit is not granted they may have to look for other property, which would mean selling the current property on 32nd Avenue. Depending on who purchased this property (i.e., a school, a real estate developer, etc.), the ramifications could be very negative for the community. We hope that you and other City Council members will consider these points during this application process. We are certain that after you review all of the information presented that you will see, as many of the area neighbors have, that granting the church a building permit for their additional education building is the right and fair thing to do. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, Curt & Charlotte O'Hara 9660 W. 22nd Place Lakewood, CO 80215 cc: Council Person: Karen A. Berry Jerry DiTullio Dean Gokey Wanda Sang Karen Adams Mike Stites Lena Rotola Larry Schulz Property appraisal system Page 1 of 2 IISch:071894 Parcel ID:39-283-05-032 Status:Active Property Type:Res IlProperty Address1103184 ROUTT ST II II IILAKEWOOD CO 80215 7026 II IlMailin2 Address:IISAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTYII (Owner Name ~j GEORGE BARBARA I SCOTT MILLICENT A Neighborhood: 1404 APPLEWOOD KNOLLS/ PARAMOUNT HEIG. ivision Name: 030800 Block Lot Key Section Township Range QuarterSection Land Sgft 020 0015 E:]28 0 69 Total Location M_aWAdditional Information Send mail to assessor(aDco.iefferson.co,us with questions or comments about this Website. Copyright @ 2003, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved. A Map of How to Get to Our Office http://wwl4.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=071894 3/15/2004 Home General Property Records Information m- Property appraisal system Page 1 of 1 IISch:048309 Parcel ID:39-283-05-004 Status:Active Property Type:Res Property Address 03137 ROBB CIR LAKEWOOD CO 80215 7023 Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY Owner Name WILCOCK SCOTT T WILCOCK MONA F Area:2 Neighborhood: 1404 APPLEWOOD KNOLLS/ PARAMOUNT HEIG: Subdivision Name: 030800 APPLEWOOD KNOLLS 2ND FLG Block Lot Key Section Township Range QuarterSection Land Sgft 020 0019 28 0 69 Total Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception 06-20-1986 94,000 Warranty Deed - Joint Tenancy 86071008 Location Map/Additional Information Send mail to assessor co, jefferson.co.us with questions or comments about this Website. Copyright @ 2003, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved. A Map of How to Get to Our Office Website information current through: 03-13-2004 http://wwl4.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=048309 3/15/2004 Home General Property Records Information Property appraisal system Page 1 of 1 JISch:048459 Parcel ID:39-283-05-030 Status:Active Property Type:Res Property Address 03084 ROUTT CIR LAKEWOOD CO 80215 7205 Mailing Address: PO BOX 1405 DUBOIS WY 82513 Owner Name BAXTER SAM M III BAXTER GLENNETA M LIFE ESTATE SON JANET Area:2 Neighborhood: 1404 APPLEWOOD KNOLLS/ PARAMOUNT HEIG: Subdivision Name: 030800 APPLEWOOD KNOLLS 2ND FLG Block Lot Key Section Township Range QuarterSection Land Sgft 020 0013 28 0 69 =EJ ::1 = Total Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception 07-O1-1978 77,000 ~ CONVER02 01-26-1982 99,500 ~ CONVEROI 10-18-1984 ~ ~ 84103237 Location Map/Additional Information Send mail to assessor@co,jefferson.co.us with questions or comments about this Website. Copyright @ 2003, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved. A Map of How to Get to Our Office Website information current through: 03-13-2004 http://wwl4.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=048459 3/15/2004 Home. General Property Records Information TELEPHONE LOG APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH SUP Name Ralph and Debbie Perri Pete Klammer Sally Zinke Mrs. Hombaker George Wheeler Pamela Waterworth nor (case manager) Jeanne Boone Melody Mazcarenaz Anonymous Don Eggleston Doug Pugate Esther Bond Mary Finken Norma McCone Barbara Clark Beverly Johnson Barbara Brown Address 3060 Oak; Lake 80215 11 Morningside 41 Morningside d 10351 W. 25 h Avenue 62 Hillside Dr. 11764 W. 33`a Avenue 26`h and Taft 3253 Pierson Street 11818 W. 36`h Avenue 3350 Kline Street 3295 Ward Road T nue I O I ou txq, sr 11605 W. 28`h Place Lakewood 80215 City of Lakewood 3024 Routt Lakewood 80215 3005 Xenon Lakewood 80215 Phone 303-202-2238 303-915-2673 303-645-9837 720-945-0575 303-239-8482 303-987-7737 303-233-2323 303-237-6868 303-238-2745 303-463-8655 303-238-0738 303-238-2077 303-205-9457 303-237-2249 303-237-5368 Comment 1-O Iti e "`~dsfti:.,.. Kristine Tomavich R5ogdr, pe1I1ig,: Doug Cullumber Opposed Opposed Opposed Opposed Opposed Opposed Traffic study referral w kotic r. 1'"c$F Opposed Opposed In Favor Opposed Opposed Opposed In Favor Opposed In Favor In Favor Opposed Wants notice Wants notice 303-237-2249 Opposed Send notice of neighborhood meeting 303-237-4191 Wants notice In favor Dan Lott 303-477-6865 * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 4/6/2004 * 4:46 PM Schedule Number ...20 002869 048274 048391 048434 048480 048540 048587 048607 048651 049188 049234 066625 136197 189562 201143 413637 413639 420133 048312 201827 A-06-2004 2:13PM FROM APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CH 303 238 2513 P.1 FAX COVER SHEET Appiewood BAPTIST CHURCH DATE:~DLI TO: 1%iuw ATTN: FAX -5b,,3 FROM: FAX#: (303) 238-25x13 This page plus J additional pages. Re: 11200 W, 32nd Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 0 Phone 303-232-9575 • Fax 303-238-2513 A-06-2004 2-13PM FROM APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CH 303 236 2613 P_2 V O x O W w O E~ °z W poll O O w O h O z U i-a U U 04 0 0 ;-4 °o o a~ Cd U s. W N C4 U it U ~ O ~a 04 °o ok Ot ~ Q _O 4'. U 94 .U iy U Cl) o ~ 00 u 04 a p" C M 'O o o CN D N~ 3 0 FW U aC1F~0O U U ~ o 0 ~a O C'4 C6 a a p cn b o cz = p G~ G F-4 6 < ~ z O d a~a0 calla U ~ h U ~ Q O ~ Qt a O ~ O z Cd O bbo o z z U W s7 ti ~ U O O O p W wTU ~ ry~ U 0 W 71 H ~ O w z U O cy > O 'CD 3 -v~ )o FAO ¢ 0 EW-' U A~O U u. M U ~ o cz y co > O Q. ~ ~ Q ~ N U N a O p 'O 0 O N O , ~ W M O O E~ F W U A O Scott Mitchell & Phoebe Mitchell John Odom Jr. & Lorrie Furman Odom E T Bond III & Esther d/ 3252 Simms St 11490 W 38th Ave 3253 Pierso ^ Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ri, O 80033 Richar*Ahison a ne Atchison 99 Willard A S I 3274 t t Whe ge, O 80033 Joee & J3254 QWheat C 80033 Clifford Elson 11555 3 ve Whea ge, O 80033 Timothy es & Die mes Wheat O 80033 John Emge R Spencer Prahl & B k ahl 3342 Simms St 3294 Pie n St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat 80033 Wilfr e9ge ai 11158 Wheat , C 8 0033 Wheat J D Johnston PO Box 1508 Bethany, OK 73008 Gary Schroeder & Patricia Schroeder 12600 W Auburn Ave Lakewood, CO 80228 Bette Jean Rodricks 3322 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 John OdoJRC LQrri Odom 11490 WC Wheat Ri 80033 Gregory Jarvis & Bar a am 293 sey Jarvis 3 Piers 'S Wheat ' 80033 Ralph Perri II & Deborah Perri 1090 Holland St Lakewood, CO 80215 Timothy Seidel & Lorraine Seidel 3272 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Howard Noble 2449 W 35th Ave Denver, CO 80211 John Patrick Pruyn Jr. & Linda Pruyn 3292 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Strand Oliv A & E G 3224 Quai WheafRi CO 80033 Paul Wells & Johanna Wells 16546 W 79th Dr Arvada, CO 80007 David Luca & Nandi? L as 3220 Rou Wheat e, C 80033 Scott Mitche & Phoe Mi hell 3252 heat SR Wheat Rid ,C CO 80033 W Robert Kumley III & Kumley Susan Ross 11595 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jerry Turner & Louise Turner 11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Elizzbe Hart 3327 P r Whea ge CO 80033 James Shanon & D Con Linda Ho Sylvester R hr & M hr 11108 W 3 Qu ' 3298 t Ri Quai Wheat Rid O Wheat ge, O 80033 Wheat Ri 80033 01/ Rodney Patri & Je a Patrick Anthony Marcello & Lori J arcello Emil Klein & A na Klein 11435 W 32 3241 Routt St~ 3224 Pierson Wheat Ridg O 80033 Wheat Ridge, 00 3 Wheat Ridge, O 8 033 Daniel Greisen & ?8033 tsen John Deffe & Maria Robert Rup Jr. & In id upp 3274 Pierson 3226 Piers t 3284 Piers Wheat Ridge Wheat Ri O 0033 Wheat Ri O 80033 Louis Ficco & Anthony Ficco James & AJ~ele Ot_oQ c Jerome Scezney & Ja ne Hunt 3650 Vance St 3495 Qua' 3395 Qua' Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat R C 80033 Wheat ge, C 80033 Leila Hill & Mc Art r 11 Applewoodpaptist Ernest Wright & Pa piyQVzight 3345 Quail 11200 W Whe Routt L3 Wheat R d , 80033 Wheat Ri C 80033 Wheat Ri CO 80033 Virginia Cellars & Ro rt ellazs Jeffrey Ni sen & e Nielsen Ross Casado Jr. & O] C dos 3310 RouttgQ~ 3281 Ro 3291 Routt Wheat R d O 0033 Wheat 'dge, C 80033 Wheat Ri C 80033 Jefferson County Sc o -Dist RI Howard Noble David Digiacomo & Le nn igiacomo 1829 Den r 980 Whispering Oak Dr 3275 Quail Golden, 0 01 Castle Rock, CO 80104 Wheat Ri 80033 Shawn & Cathy Swai psori, Harbert Hartline & Ruth Hartline Luethy Helen 3204 Quail t 11151 W 32nd Ave 15947 W Ellswood Ln Wheat Ri O 0033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Golden, CO 80401 Richard Anthony Chinisci Louise Turner & D Edwards Loren Rodney Casados & Li Ph ps Georgia Chinisc l/ 5393 Maggie Ln 3201 Routt 3204 Pie Evergreen, CO 80439 Wheat R 80033 Wheat e, C 80033 Peter Klammer & a Klammer Deborah Kidder J D Johnston 3200 Routt 3370 Simms St PO Bo 150 Wheat Rid 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Beth 3008 Dmk Investment Company Roger Knight William Cook 120 S Riverside Plz 1800 n Ave 3595 Quail St Chicago, IL 60606 Gold p 80401 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 William Cook 3595 at S Wheat Ri O 80033 Ardalan Hardi & To erson 3615 Qu Wheat 80033 Tom Patterson WilliWC..ook 3615 Quail St 3595 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Whe 033 Applewood Baptist Church Michael Larkin & Barbra Larkin Jeffrey Putt 11200 W 32nd Ave 3187 Robb Cir 3197 Robb Cir Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Denver, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Margaret Howard Raymond Langen & Winona Langen James Mckay 3046 Robb Cir 3067 Robb Cir 3078 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Warren Mcnassor & Virginia Mcnassor Jan Laitos & Cindy Danaher Louis Leprino & Nyla Leprino 3099 Robb Cir 3095 Quail St 3049 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Perry Alvan S & Perry Rita Joseph Broccio Paul Wood & Kathleen Wood 3062 Robb Cir 2895 Robb Cir 3045 Quail St Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 David Hittle & Jane Hittle Clare Hamilton E T Bond III & Esther Bond 3159 Robb Cir 11264 W 31st Ave 3253 Pierson St Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Richard Atchison & Charlene Atchison • Willard & A S Gabel Joee & Jeff Schleusner 12115 W 29th PI 3274 Quail St 3254 Quail St Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Gary Riedel & Sherri Riedel ' Clifford Elson Timothy James & Daniel James 11553 W 31 st PI 11555 W 32nd Ave 3223 Pierson St Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Strand Oliver A & E G R Spencer Prahl & Becky Prahl Barry Wilhmrth & Teri Wilhnarth 3224 Quail St 3294 Pierson St 3047 Routt Cir Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Louis Martinelli & Sylvia Martinelli Wilfred Sugai Applewood Knolls Swim & Tennis Club In 11552 W 31st P1 11158 W 33rd Ave 13471 W 25th Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Golden, CO 80401 Baxter Glenneta M Life Estate David Lucas Nancy Lucas Jeffrey Archer Sam Baxter lII 3220 Routt St 11502 W 31st PI 3084 Routt Cir Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Etha Logan Smith Carl F Paul Hintgen & Cindy Hintgen 3087 Routt Cir 11532 W 31st PI 11582 W 31st PI Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Gregory Jarvis & Barbra Ramsey Jarvis Elizabeth Hart • James Shanon & D Jo Shannon 3293 Pierson St 3327 Pierson St 11108 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Linda Hock James Bray & Vivian Jo Bray • Sylvester Rohr & Mary Rohr 3294 Quail St 3065 Quail St 3298 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Rodney Patrick & Jeanette Patrick Emerson Droullard & Lily Droullard Astuno Rocco D The & Rocco Violet Astor 11435 W 32nd Ave 11560 W 32nd Ave 3154 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Millicent Scott & B D George David Cole & Marjorie Cole Walter Prebis & Lona Prebis 188 Chippewa Cir 3050 Quail St 3060 Quail St Henrietta, NY 14467 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Carl Hansen & Betty Hansen • Anthony Marcello & Lori Joan Marcello Emil Klein & Anna Klein 3054 Routt Cir 3241 Routt St 3224 Pierson St Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Daniel Greisen & Carol Greisen • John Deffert & Maria Deffert Robert Rupp Jr. & Ingrid Rupp 3274 Pierson St 3226 Pierson St 3284 Pierson St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 James & Adele Otoole Jerome Scezney & Jacqueline Hunt Leila Hill & Mc Arthur Hill 3495 Quail St 3395 Quail St 3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Applewood Bapti C ch Ernest Wright & Patricia Wright Virginia Cellars & Robert Cellars 11200 W 3240 Routt St 3310 Routt St Wheat R O 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jeffrey Nielsen & Jeffery Nielsen Ross Casados Jr. & Olga Casados • Jefferson County Schools Dist Rl 3281 Routt St 3291 Routt St 1829 Denver West Dr Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Golden, CO 80401 David Digiacomo & Leeanne Digiacomo Shawn & Cathy Swainson • Richard Anthony Chinisci 3275 Quail St 3204 Quail St Georgia R Chinisci Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 3204 Pierson St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Rodney Casados & Linn Phelps • Peter Klammer & Cynthia Klammer • Roger Knight 3201 Routt St 3200 Routt St 1800 Washington Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Golden, CO 80401 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Applewood Baptist Churc h Parcel: 022669 Site :11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 11/24/1961 Mail :11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :9159 Exempt,Church,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:2.80 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Larkin Michael W Parcel: 048245 Site :3187 Robb Cir Denver 80 215 Xfered: 07/28/1995 Mail :3187 Robb Cir Denver Cc 80215 Price :$144,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,338 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) . Owner :Pritt Jeffrey Parcel: 048269 Site :3197 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 06/17/1994 Mail :3197 Robb Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$139,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool: BldgSF:1,671 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) . - Owner :Howard Margaret S Parcel: 048278 Site :3046 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 12/17/1999 Mail :3046 Robb Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:1,650, Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Langen Raymond -E Parcel: 048284 Site :3067 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: Mail :3067 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF:1,930 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Mckay James E Parcel: 048285 Site :3078 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 08/07/1985 Mail :3078 Robb Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$132,500 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool: B1dgSF:2,510 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Mc Nassor Warren T Parce1: 048291 Site :3099 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: Mail :3099 Robb Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-238-0175 Bedrm :3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF:1,616 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner Owner :Laitos Jan G Parcel: 048296 Site :3095 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 09/14/2001 Mail :3095 Quail St Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,990 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Leprino Louis M Parce1: 048298 Site :3049 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: Mail :3049 Robb Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:2,536 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Perry Alvan S Trustee Parcel :048305 Site :3062 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered :02/26/2001 Mail :3062 Robb Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: BidgSF:1,453 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Broccio Joseph S Parcel :048309 Site :3137 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered :01/06/1998 Mail :2895 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:1,821 Ac: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Wood Paul R Parcel: 048312 Site :3045 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 11/25/1998 Mail :3045 Quail St Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$199,900 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1965 Pool: B1dgSF:2,034 AC: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Hittle David D Parce1: 048322 Site :3159 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 01/08/2002 Mail :3159 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price :$231,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TOtRm: YB:1963 Pool: B1dgSF:1,685 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hamilton Clare C Parcel: 048323 Site :11264 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 11/30/1994 Mail :11264 W 31st Ave Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-234-9065 Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,579 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Bond E T III Parce1: 048330 Site :3253 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 10/22/1997 Mail :3253 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 800 33 Price :$155,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-238-2745 Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1966 Pool: B1dgSF:1,483 Ac: * - • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Atchison Richard N Parcel: 048331 Site :3273 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: Mail :12115 W 29th P1 Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF:2,600 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Gabel Willard E/Gabel A S Parcel: 048332 Site :3274 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 04/11/1991 Mail :3274 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1980 Pool: B1dgSF:1,923 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :SChleusner Joee A/Jeff Parce1: 048333 Site :3254 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 06/02/2003 Mail :3254 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1975 Pool: B1dgSF:2,733 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Riedel Gary L Parcel: 048353 Site :11553 W 31st P1 Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 07/09/2002 Mail :11553 W 31st P1 Lakewood Co 80215 Price :$269,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-232-5757 Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,689 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Elson Clifford R Parcel: 048360 Site :11555 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 08/29/1996 Mail :11555 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80 033 Price :$70,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 13ath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1924 Pool: B1dgSF:1,122 Ac:.31 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :James Timothy A Parcel :048378 Site :3223 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/21/2000 Mail :3223 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Cc 800 33 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,315 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Strand Oliver A/E G Trust Parcel :048379 Site :3224 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :02/26/1999 Mail :3224 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:1,604 Ac: Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Prahl R Spencer Parcel: 048396 _ Site :3294 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 09/02/1999 Mail :3294 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$275,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1dgSF:2,7 54 Ac:.43 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Willmarth Barry Parcel: 048399 Site :3047 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 06/25/1999 Mail :3047 Routt Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price :$195,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF:1,3 05 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • owner :Martinelli Louis E Parce1: 048435 Site :11552 W 31st Pl Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 06/29/1976 Mail :11552 W 31st P1 'Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$45,500 . Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:1,974 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Sugai Wilfred M;+ Parcel: 048439 Site :11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 04/20/1994 Mail :11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$150,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone - Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,748 Ac: * - MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Applewood Knolls Swim & Tennis Clu b Inc Parcel: 048448 Site :11520 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: Mail :13471 W 25th Ave Golden Cc 80401 Price Use :2112 Com,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: - Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Baxter Glenneta M Life Estate Et Al Parcel: 048459 Site :3084 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 10/18/1984 Mail :3084 Routt Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:1,458 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Lucas David M Parcel: 048488 Site :3220 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 11/26/1985 Mail :3220 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$42,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF:2,607 AC: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Archer Jeffrey D Parce1: 048490 Site :11502 W 31st P1 Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 08/23/2002 Mail :11502 W 31st P1 Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$246,500 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF:2,438 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Logan Etha L Parce1: 048516 Site :3087 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 01/27/1992 Mail :3087 Routt Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF:2,211 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Smith Carl F Trust Parcel :048612 Site :11532 W 31st P1 Lakewood 80215 Xfered :08/27/2003 Mail :11532 W 31st P1 Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-233-1830 Bedrm :3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:2,295 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Hintgen Paul R Parce1 :048635 Site :11582 W 31st P1 Lakewood 80215 Xfered :12/07/1993 Mail :11582 W 31st P1 Lakewood Co 80215 Price :$139,450 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TOtRm: YB:1962 Pool: B1dgSF:2,264 Ac: Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Jarvis Gregory A Parcel :065877 Site :3293 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 01/24/2000 Mail :3293 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$173,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1966 Pool: B1dgSF:2,088 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Hart Elizabeth A Parcel: 066817 Site :3327 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 10/03/1995 Mail :3327 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$136,650 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-237-3787 Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,252 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Shanon James R/Shannon D Jo Parce1: 066818 Site :11108 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 08/17/1993 Mail :11108 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$129,950 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,534 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hock Linda J Parce1: 066819 Site :3294 Quail St Wheat Ri dge 80033 Xfered: 06/19/1992 Mail :3294 Quail St Wheat Ri dge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1968 -Pool: B1dgSF:1,578 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bray James P Parcel: 066961 Site :3065 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 06/27/1979 Mail :3065 Quail St Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$87,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF:1,998 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Rohr Sylvester P Parcel: 070666 Site :3298 Quail St Wheat Ri dge 80033 Xfered: Mail :3298 Quail St Wheat Ri dge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1972 Pool: B1dgSF:2,413 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Patrick Rodney J Parcel: 070814 Site :11435 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: Mail :11435 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.50 TotRm: YB:1932 Pool: B1dgSF:1,285 Ac:1.09 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Droullard Emerson K Parce1: 071815 Site :11560 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 05/21/2002 Mail :11560 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF:1,537 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Astuno Rocco D Jr Trus t The Parcel: 071816 Site :3154 Routt St Lakewood 60215 Xfered: 04/05/1995 Mail :3154 Routt St Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool:Yes B1dgSF:1,662 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • -.Owner :Scott Millicent A/George B D Parcel: 071894 Site :3184 Routt St Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 06/18/1993 Mail :188 Chippewa Cir Henri etta Ny 14467 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF:2,240 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Cole David R Parce1: 074379 Site :3050 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered: Mail :3050 Quail St Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone _ Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF:1,999 Ac: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Prebis Walter J Parcel: 074398 Site :3060 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 09/29/1993 Mail :3060 Quail St Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: BidgSF:1,824 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Hansen Carl L Parcel: 085997 Site :3054 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered: 05/10/1999 Mail :3054 Routt Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$242,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: BidgSF:1,245 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Marcello Anthony R Parce1: 088558 Site :3241 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 02/13/1990 Mail :3241 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$40,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1991 Pool: BidgSF:2,1 45 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Klein Emil Parce1: 127855 Site :3224 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 08/24/1983 Mail :3224 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$110,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1975 Pool: B1dgSF:2,093 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Greisen Daniel F Parcel: 127856 Site :3274 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 12/07/1992 Mail :3274 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$125,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1970 Pool: B1dgSF:1,466 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) . Owner :Deffert John Parcel: 127857 Site :3226 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 01/08/1976 Mail :3226 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1983 Pool: BidgSF:2,048 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Rupp Robert L Jr Parcel: 127858 Site :3284 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 10/01/1996 Mail :3284 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:2,222 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Otoole James P/Adele M Parcel: 136382 Site :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 09/08/1989 Mail :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$207,500 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1979 Pool: B1dgSF:3,031 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) . - Owner :Sares Mark A Parcel: 136383 Site - :3455 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 09/26/20.02 Mail :3455 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$497,900 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 6 Bath:3.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:3,009 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) . - owner :Gibbard Arthur A Parcel: 136384 Site :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 07/29/2002 Mail :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.25 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:2,490 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner Owner :Scezney Jerome F Parcel: 136385 Site :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 04/04/1997 Mail :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$325,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: BidgSF:2,816 Ac: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Hill Leila J Parcel: 136386 Site :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 06/20/1983 Mail :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TOtRm: YB:1976 Pool:Yes B1dgSF:3,034 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Applewood Baptist Church Parcel: 151122 Site :11225 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 09/28/1993 Mail :11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :9159 Exempt,Church,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:14.76 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Wright Ernest A Parcel: 174511 Site :3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 03/25/1994 Mail :3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$214,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1987 Pool: B1dgSF:2,264 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Archer Dolores F Parcel: 174512 Site :3260 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 01/16/2002 Mail :3260 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:3.00 TotRm: Y13:1985 Pool: B1dgSF:2,274 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) . Owner :Craven Anthony K Parcel: 174513 Site :3280 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 03/24/1999 Mail :3280 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$349,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1988 Pool: B1dgSF:2,369 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • owner :Cellars Virginia B Parcel: 174514 Site :3310 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 04/29/1999 Mail :3310 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1994 Pool: B1dgSF:2,976 Ac:2.34 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) . - Owner :Moss David W/Jill B Parcel: 174515 Site :3221 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 04/25/2003 Mail :3221 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1987 Pool: B1dgSF:1,610 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • owner :Chesley Duane P Parce1: 174516 Site :3261 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 01/25/1996 Mail :3261 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:1.75 TOtRm: YB:1989 Pool: B1dgSF:2,412 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Nielsen Jeffrey C Parcel: 174517 Site :3281 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 08/10/2000 Mail :3281 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF:2,621 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Casados Ross Jr Parcel :174518 Site :3291 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/26/1990 Mail :3291 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$155,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF:2,826 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Jefferson County Schools Dist R1 Parcel :176990 Site :3400 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :04/15/1966 Mail :1829 Denver West Dr Golden Co 80401 Price Use :9169 Exempt,School,Land Phone Bedrm : Bath: TotRm:l YB:1980 Pool: B1dgSF:45, 361 Ac:10.56 Information compiled from various sources. Real (state Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Digiacomo David R Parcel: 200432 Site :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 12/20/200.1 Mail :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TOtRM: YB:1981 Pool: B1dgSF:2,774 Ac:2.27 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • owner :Swainson Shawn P/Cathy A Parcel: 200433 Site :3204 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 12/01/1999 Mail :3204 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$166,900 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,381 Ac:.25 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Chinisci Richard Anthony Parcel: 200439 Site :3204 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 09/28/1993 Mail :3204 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Cc 8003 3 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 6 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1dgSF:2,224 Ac:.37 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Casados Rodney J Parcel: 201827 Site :3201 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 10/22/2003 Mail :3201 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$355,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.50 TOtRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF:3,039 Ac:.34 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ; Owner :Klammer Peter F Parce1: 201900 Site :3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 03/15/1996 Mail :3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$280,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF:3,190 Ac:.39 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Knight Roger E Parcel: 413640 Site :3331 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered: 06/23/2003 Mail :1800 Washington Ave Golden Cc 80401 Price Use :1129 Res,Improved Outbuilding Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:.42 Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 3/26/2004 * 9:15 AM Parcel Number ...70 39 282 04 049 39 282 05 053 39 28205 052 39 282 05 051 39 282 05 050 39 282 05 049 39 282 05 048 39 282 05 087 39 282 05 086 39 282 05 071 39 282 05 072 39 282 05 073 39 282 05 074 39 282 05 044 39 282 05 045 39 282 05 046 39 282 05 043 39 282 05 042 39 282 05 041 39 282 05 040 39 282 05 039 39 282 05 038 39 282 05 064 39 282 05 023 39 282 05 021 39 282 05 078 39 282 05 069 39 282 05 068 39 282 05 067 39 282 05 066 39 282 05 065 39 282 05 037 39 282 05 084 39 282 05 085 39 282 05 090 39 282 05 091 39 282 05 092 39 282 05 030 39 282 05 031 39 282 05 055 39 282 05 061 39.282 05 056 39 282 05 057 39 282 05 058 39 282 05 059 39 282 05 054 39 282 05 034 39 282 05 036 39 282 06 006 39 282 06 007 39 282 06 008 39 282 06 009 39 282 06 010 Search Parameters (continued) 39 282 06 011 39 282 06 012 39 282 06 013 39 282 06 014 39 282 06 016 39 282 06 017 39 282 06 018 39 282 06 005 39 282 06 004 39 282 06 003 39 282 07 001 39 282 08 015 39 282 08 006 39 282 08 005 39 282 08 004 39 282 08 003 39 282 08 002 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Mitchell Scott Parcel :002869 Site :*no Site Address* Xfered :06/28/2002 Mail :3252 Simms St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$240,000 Use :1155 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: Bldg SF: Ac:.ll MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • owner :Odom John A Jr Parcel :048274 Site :11490 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/08/1978 Mail :11490 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :4133 Agr,Mountain Meadow Phone Bedrm: 5 Bath:4.75 TotRm: YB:1901 Pool: B1dgSF:5,076 Ac:8.16 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bond E T III Parcel :048330 Site :3253 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :10/22/1997 Mail :3253 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$155,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land - Phone :303-238-2745 Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1966 Pool: B1dgSF:1,483 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Atchison Richard N Parcel :048331 Site :3273 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :12115 W 29th P1 Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF:2,600 Ac: : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Gabel Willard E/Gabel A S - Parcel :048332 Site :3274 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :04/11/1991 Mail :3274 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1980 Pool: B1dgSF:1,923 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Schleusner Joee A/Jeff Parcel :048333 Site :3254 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/02/2003 Mail :3254 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1975 Pool: B1dgSF:2,733 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Elson Clifford R Parcel :048360 Site :11555 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :08/29/1996 Mail :11555 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$70,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1924 Pool: B1dgSF:1,122 Ac:.31 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :James Timothy A Parcel :048378 Site :3223 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/21/2000 Mail :3223 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,315 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Strand Oliver A/E G Trust Parcel :048379 Site :3224 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :02/26/1999 Mail :3224 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:1,604 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Emge John W;+ Parcel :048391 Site :3342 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :10/11/1988 Mail :3342 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 - Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land - Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1972 Pool: B1dgSF:1,800 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Prahl R Spencer Parcel :048396 Site :3294 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/02/1999 Mail :3294 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$275,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1dgSF:2,754 Ac:.43 Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Wells Paul W Parcel :048434 Site :3362 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :01/16/2003 Mail :16546 W 79th Dr Arvada Co 80007 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF :1,539 Ac: : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Sugai Wilfred M;+ Parcel :048439 Site :11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :04/20/1994 Mail :11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$150,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF :1,748 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Johnston J D Parcel :048480 Site :3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :02/03/1997 Mail :PO Box 1508 Bethany Ok 73008 Price Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:1.00 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Lucas David M Parcel :048488 Site :3220 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/26/1985 Mail. :3220 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$42,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF :2,607 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Schroeder Gary L Parcel :048520 Site :11575 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :01/02/2002 Mail :12600 W Auburn Ave Lakewood Co 80228 Price :$175,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1920 Pool: B1dgSF :1,427 Ac:.66 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Perri Ralph J II Parcel :048540 Site :*no Site Address* Xfered :12/31/1984 Mail :1090 Holland St Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:3.77 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Mitchell Scott Parcel :048575 Site :3252 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/03/2002 Mail :3252 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$240,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF :2,062 Ac:.30 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Rodricks Bette Jean Parcel :048587 Site :3322 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :3322 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool: B1dgSF :1,859 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Seidel Timothy R Parcel :048607 Site :3272 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/27/1996 Mail :3272 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$135,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool: B1dgSF :1,578 Ac:.23 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Kumley Robert E III Parcel :048651 Site :11595 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/27/2001 Mail. :11595 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$209,900 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1954 Pool: B1dgSF :1,223 Ac:.33 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Odom John A Jr Parcel :048837 Site :11440 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/02/1992 Mail :11490 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$400,000 Use :4133 Agr,Mountain Meadow Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1899 Pool: B1dgSF :1,214 Ac:8.72 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Noble Howard G Parcel :049188 Site :11254 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :02/14/2001 Mail :2449 W 35th Ave Denver Co 80211 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: l Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1950 Pool: B1dgSF:2,151 Ac:1.88 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Turner Jerry B Parcel :049234 Site :11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: . B1dgSF:1,617 Ac:4.39 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : owner :Jarvis Gregory A Parcel :065877 Site :3293 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :01/24/2000 Mail :3293 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$173,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1966 Pool: B1dgSF:2,088 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Pruyn John Patrick Jr Parcel :066625 Site :3292 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/31/1992 Mail :3292 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$90,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF:1,007 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hart Elizabeth A Parcel :066817 Site :3327 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :10/03/1995 Mail :3327 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$136,650 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-237-3787 Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,252 Ac: Met=Scan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Shanon James R/Shannon D Jo Parcel :066818 Site :11108 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :08/17/1993 Mail :11108 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$129,950 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,534 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hock Linda J Parcel :066819 Site :3294 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/19/1992 Mail :3294 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,578 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Rohr Sylvester P Parcel :070666 Site :3298 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :3298 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1972 Pool: B1dgSF:2,413 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Patrick Rodney J Parcel :070814 Site :11435 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :11435 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land - Phone Bedrm:3 Bath:1.50 TotRm: YB:1932 Pool: B1dgSF:1,285 Ac:1.09 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Marcello Anthony R Parcel :088558 Site :3241 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :02/13/1990 Mail. :3241 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$40,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1991 Pool: B1dgSF:2,145 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Klein Emil Parcel :127855 Site :3224 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :08/24/1983 Mail :3224 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$1101000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1975 Pool: B1dgSF:2,093 Ac: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. •MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Greisen Daniel F Site :3274 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :3274 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Bedrm:3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1970 Pool MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Deffert John Site :3226 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :3226 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Bedrm:4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1983 Pool MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Rupp Robert L Jr Site :3284 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :3284 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Bedrm: Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool : MetroScan / Jefferson Owner:Ficco Louis J Site :11340 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :3650 Vance St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Use :5112 Res,Apartments,Improved Land Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:3 YB:1979 Pool * • MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Otoole James P/Adele M Site :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Bedrm:4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1979 Pool MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Parcel :127856 Xfered :12/07/1992 Price :$125,000 Phone B1dgSF:1,466 Ac: (CO) : Parcel :127857 Xfered :01/08/1976 Price Phone B1dgSF:2,048 Ac: (CO) : Parcel :127858 Xfered :10/01/1996 Price Phone B1dgSF:2,222 Ac: (CO) : Parcel :136197 Xfered :05/04/1989 Price Phone B1dgSF:28,504 Ac:4.42 (CO) : Parcel :136382 Xfered :09/08/1989 Price :$207,500 Phone B1dgSF:3,031 Ac: (CO) : * •a~Owner :Sares Mark A Parcel :136383 Site :3455 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/26/2002 Mail :3455 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$497,900 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 6 Bath:3.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF :3,009 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • ?'Dwner :Gibbard Arthur A Parcel :136384 Site :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/29/2002 Mail :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.25 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF :2,490 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Scezney Jerome F Parcel :136385 Site :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :04/04/1997 Mail :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$325,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1dgSF :2,816 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hill Leila J Parcel :136386 Site :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/20/1983 Mail :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: Yes B1dgSF :3,034 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Applewood Baptist Church Parcel :151122 Site :11225 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/28/1993 Mail :11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :9159 Exempt,Church,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:14.76 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Wright Ernest A Parcel :174511 Site :3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/25/1994 Mail :3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$214,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1987 Pool: B1dgSF :2,264 Ac: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : -Owner :Archer Dolores F Parcel :174512 Site :3260 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :01/16/2002 Mail- :3260 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF:2,274 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Craven Anthony K Parcel :174513 Site :3280 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/24/1999 Mail :3280 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$349,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1988 Pool: B1dgSF:2,369 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Cellars Virginia B Parcel :174514 Site :3310 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :04/29/1999 Mail :3310 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co. 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1994 Pool: B1dgSF:2,976 Ac:2.34 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Moss David W/Jill B Parcel :174515 Site :3221 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :04/25/2003 Mail :3221 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1987 Pool: B1dgSF:1,610 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Chesley Duane P Parcel :174516 Site :3261 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :01/25/1996 Mail :3261 Routt St (No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1989 Pool: B1dgSF:2,412 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Nielsen Jeffrey C Parcel :174517 Site :3281 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :08/10/2000 Mail :3281 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: BldgSF:2,621 Ac: - MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Casados Ross Jr Parcel :174518 Site :3291 Routt St Wheat Ridge 60033 Xfered :07/26/1990 Mail :3291 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$155,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.5.0 TotRm: YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF:2,826 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Jefferson County Schools Dist R1 Parcel :176990 Site :3400 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :04/15/1966 Mail :1829 Denver West Dr Golden Co 60401 Price Use :9169 Exempt,School,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1980 Pool: B1d gSF:45,361 Ac:10.56 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Noble Howard G Parcel :189562 Site :*no Site Address* Xfered :02/02/2001 Mail :980 Whispering Oak Dr Castle Rock Co 80104 Price Use :1155 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1d gSF: Ac:.60 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Digiacomo David R Parcel :200432 Site :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/20/2001 Mail :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1981 Pool: Bld gSF:2,774 Ac:2.27 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Swainson Shawn P/Cathy A Parcel :200433 Site :3204 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/01/1999 Mail :3204 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$166,900 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1d gSF:1,381 Ac:.25 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hartline Harbert A Parcel :200436 Site :11151 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/28/1993 Mail :11151 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool: B1dgSF:1,984 Ac: .26 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Luethy Helen Trustee Parcel :200438 Site :3203 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/28/1993 Mail :15947 W Ellswood Ln Golden Co 80401 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF:1,861 Ac: .25 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Chinisci Richard Anthony Parcel :200439 Site :3204 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/28/1993 Mail :3204 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 - Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land - Phone Bedrm: 6 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1dgSF:2,224 Ac: .37 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Turner Louise Et Al Parcel :201143 Site :11100 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/16/2002 Mail :5393 Maggie Ln Evergreen Co 80439 Price Use :4141 Agr,Grazing Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1922 Pool: B1dgSF:968 Ac: 11.98 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Casados Rodney J Parcel :201827 Site :3201 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :10/22/2003 Mail :3201 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$355,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF:3,039 Ac: .34 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Klammer Peter F Parcel :201900 Site :3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/15/1996 Mail :3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$280,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF:3,190 Ac: .39 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Kidder Deborah L Parcel :413637 Site :3400 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/19/1993 Mail :3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$238,000 Use :1155 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: .47 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Johnston J D Parcel :413638 Site :3430 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :04/05/2000 Mail :PO Box 1508 Bethany Ok 73008 - Price Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: Tot Rm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: .64 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Dmk Investment Company Parcel :413639 Site :3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/23/1993 Mail :120 S Riverside Plz Chicago Il 60606 Price :$170,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 6 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1d gSF:4,076 Ac: .4.5 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Knight Roger E Parcel :413640 Site :3331 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/23/2003 Mail :1800 Washington Ave Golden Co 80401 Price Use :1129 Res,Improved Outbuilding Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1d gSF: Ac: .42 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Cook William C Parcel :420133 Site :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/05/2003 Mail :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$329,150 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1999 Pool: B1d gSF:1,642 Ac: .16 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Cook William C Parcel :420134 Site :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/05/2003 Mail :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$329,150 Use :1177 Vacant,Residential,Limited Size Phone Bedrm: Bath: Tot Rm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:.07 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Patt erson Tom A Parcel :436080 Site :3615 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/09/2001 Mail :3615 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$50,000 Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: Tot Rm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:.43 * • Met=Scan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Cook William C Parcel :436081 Site :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/05/2003 Mail :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$329,150 Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:.06 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hard i Ardalan Parcel :436082 Site :*no Site Address* Xfered :03/09/2001 Mail :3615 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$50,000 Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:.09 Information comprled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. - r,.. m , . ~ . ~ ~i:_ +as - K. _a. ~ d~`.T~ xF r ~ Rt _ aor-~ ~d a~'~'Ni~e' " C ~w ~ , ~.m.,~,,..A, r._: ,_...g~}i'°.~:.~~vvi e..,.~wn ~~~h..':a .~wa.i~,~.,.aM 1,. .x.21: s'l Yk a..., 1;,.*n~C.ri~.ha.,._,~~.. .r~,., 3..,._, x.,.... v._l.9.._...c;.. __d': 4.~ UI _ 4' "H~~~.,~{'i ~ti`I ~:~,'~A ~~.,.l tt~?b r rr'"fGi?. ,f ~Y sh.;• ~'~r( -moo - , „i ~ ~.,..,i.,, ~ ~ ~ 1 Illlnnmmn~r~^•~•~~•• ~ i a f ~wrrra~ 6  1~ . w 6 a ~ - awrrw +mawe~w~uwrA rr~~wMw~„ rwaw~wwe .r. P t 9 a i J i s { i 6 # ~ i ~ 7~ . ~ 4~' ~..4 b j F auM ■ -i 4° _ r _ i g' gain J k i 4 E i r wr srw wawwMw+r+rwr w 71~ ~ dif ~TI~ w rte.,... xw~.. N.CIh ~ rar .w `..cw.w 1 w ~ ' ~~.~W Y r+ } ~ ~ + ar I ~ • ~i ~ w ~ f ~ ~ 1 . , r,.~.,...~~. ~ . ~ ~.-ra....~...~.....-w.,.,...-__ ~..~...a...,-.._.._.~,...~.. 7,...~..... ~ - .._,~,~.~~.~.__~_:w,_..,~,..~..._......~.~._v.....- ri. t . ~w ~r. _ ~ . ~k~~ Li 11 ~-u 1 ~ ' f { S I I d wMr~► ~ • ~ hMR , ~ 4, ~.~rrw~► M j 1 I P 4 t 1 :z~ 4  MOL Structural Engi mow,-,..~,,.. +.~o......, ' t i t. ! 'k ~ s ner Mechanical En m Electrical En } V. a ry~yrn^' •"'!C ~•~";BI'P 4 ~'r:.T~jr ry r`~ • 4 .~~rr 1 ~ a~ b~. , MM`"' F r. ~ T tr' ;ir ~1~ 1~g n `^06M1~ ,nt ~ 9 ris k ,7„ ~ ~ 7 , . 1, k't , t 5~ C 3l T`F y, .,,!iar - . , .i _ r. w~,. ~j ~ ~f F'~ X t M ..,-ate ;i t t t 1 1 a  4 ' ~ e J Y e t a a A ' r Y ~ 1. 1~ d b 1 s s e e Y ' A A 6 ~I1 4 } t r R Y +r i. - ~e + 9 ~ _ ~ r i m~_. 5 _ m _ mss. ~l  ~ r P'_. d'.~ .....r Mnorhp,.,f Drwn Structurof Engi Mechanical En lead I I ~ ~ NEW LrJC.A.7r- uiI~UII.f~I I A13111 F3IsiFl^ h N A D`TICT C~LI112C~I-~ Chkd: p INS Job ~o Electrical En i ,,,W~.»~ _ - y..ta':YaiS~u"~ti'a,TtC.'~i:rrCtr'uP.~3r:.a Avw'q' ~,~'..s _,"a. G'ZA..»,... Y~ ~ .w'... t.. :\t . .o-, _ e ~ ~?~u ~~d c a.3 ~ r!I~t~'sY'?.C~..t'~; ~~'~R ~s.Sc.~°;^S2u'+~ y+.:a -~i+i.x._,w'..w.r~,v'i,...~.raa:-a~~c tc,^..:.;zi'.t,~..~... v:a~ ::73A.k1n .1r+.,e;.`.c~ 2::t=+SS€ 4~ ..-:i-°~ ?r`.. '!::~w _~da...~~'k,-. _ .n . - ~ , „ F.~ - v~e-g k'.-.. ~ *a ~ .t., fi:... F ~ t ryry~ r ti:. "{1J fYl+}~~~ ~~E ~fi, ,1,~~rtr , e l 7^' . f~'S~(k ^,F R 1~~+ ' fR ~t`Af Z 1 .'ib' ~.v L'.. ,.m-. rr ~ ~-Y!L ~y2 e Sr~ t w ~ ~ ~ ~ r b~ y . < x. ~ ti w ~ ( ~H . r. a".';fig ~ ~ y s  e $ B d • J r n_...w ,p! I' .~.awr.. _ ' a ~ ` • • ® ~ A t t 9 ~ ~ s I 0 ~ a P 4 } d 4 7* t i ' , d  . a! ~ 1 rviA x, in~.~ r At Dabs.$•',~~04` Sheet No. StrWCturd F.r4ineer 9~=J ames E. Moorhea Arch-it ects "m Planner Drwn jlzm Mechanical Eaa ine w Ch, kd: of I 6w Job No.c~o1_ of m Elec~ri,col 'Enear i ti~0~ WHEAT,PO m CO<OR Pao Wheat Ridge Community Development Department PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY Meeting Date: 13 March 2003 Attending Applicant(s): Duffy Deardorff, James Moorhead, Dave Lloyd Address/Phone: 11200 West 32nd Ave. WR CO 80033 303.232.9575 ext 23 (Duffy) Attending Staff: Meredith Reckert, Travis Crane, Mary Austin, Darin Morgan, Dave Brossman, Mike Garcia, Gina Gabriel, Alan White Address or Specific Site Location: 11225 W. 32nd Ave. - Applewood Baptist Existing Zoning: R-1 (residential one) Existing Comp. Plan: SF (4) Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: Want to expand facilities. The congregation is approximately 3,000 people (only 1,600-1,800 are resident). The current facilities can only accommodate approximately 500 people. Plan on constructing a new education building within the first 1-3 years, then a new worship center within ten years. The Church is very aware of the adjacent neighbors, and has taken steps to mitigate the effects of the influx of people. Will a neighborhood meeting need to be held prior to application submittal? Yes Planning comments: The expansion of the church facilities would constitute the need for a special use permit. This would include a neighborhood meeting, a hearing before Planning Commission and a hearing before City Council. Parking could be problematic, especially given the proximity to surrounding neighborhoods. The phasing would not be desirable. It would be extremely difficult to obtain a special use permit for a use or expansion that will occur in ten years. It is acceptable to show future plans to Planning Commission and City Council, however these future plans will be strictly illustrative in nature. Upon which time the 2"d phase (new worship center) is needed, another special use permit will be required. The property is currently three lots. If any building expansion crosses a lot line, a consolidation plat would be required. This can be an administrative review if there is no public right-of-way dedication required by the Public Works Department. This plat will need to be recorded with Jefferson County. In addition to all required documents associated with a special use permit submittal, a lighting study with photometric plan, landscape plan, and proposed elevations should be provided with the initial submittal. An application and information pertaining to the special use permit process has been included for your review. Public Works comments: If the total scope of improvements is greater than 1 acre in area, an NPDES permit will be required. A parking analysis and traffic impact analysis will be required with the initial submittal. A drainage report, grading plan and erosion control plan will be required with the initial submittal. The 100-year flood plain must be addressed. The open channel on the east side of the property must be addressed. It would be advantageous to contact the City of Wheat Ridge Traffic Engineer, Steve Nguyen, and the City of Lakewood Traffic Engineer prior to the neighborhood meeting. There is a possibility that right-of-way adjacent to 32nd Avenue may be required for dedication of public improvements. Building comments: none Streetscape / Architectural Design comments: none Other comments: It would be beneficial to contact Dave Roberts, Wheat Ridge Fire Department. He can be reached at 303.424.7323. Should you choose to pursue this proposal, your next step would be to hold a neighborhood meeting. You will need to coordinate with a case planner to set a meeting date and time. The case planner must be in attendance at this meeting, however the applicant will be responsible for explaining the proposal. Approximately one week prior to this meeting, a letter must be sent out to all neighbors within 600 feet of the subject property. You should submit your letter to the case planner for review prior to mailing to the neighborhood meeting notice. The City will generate a neighborhood list, but the applicant will be responsible for distributing these letters. After the meeting has occurred, an application may be filed with the Community Development Department. Once an application has been submitted, a referral period will begin. During this time, outside agencies are given a chance to review the proposal and send comments to the Community Development Department. After the referral period has ended, a list of required corrections will be sent back to the applicant. Please be aware that it may take several resubmittals. After all required corrections are made, a Planning Commission date will be set. Fifteen days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant will be responsible for posting the property. Planning staff will create the public notice signs, however the applicant must post the signs. The applicant (or his representative) must be present at the public hearing, and should be prepared to address members of the Planning Commission. This process will be repeated for the City Council hearing. James E. Moorhead - Architect 9731 Cypress Point Circle Lone Tree CO 80124-3103 February 24, 2003 MASTER PLAN FOR APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH 11225 West 32nd Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Request for Approval and Special Use Permit (303) 790-8065 Applewood Baptist Church owns 14.67 acres at the above address and wishes to Master Plan this land for future development. "Church use" was an acceptable use with the original zoning, but is not an acceptable use under the current R-1 Zoning. Therefore, the Church seeks to secure a Special Use Permit as well as approval for the Master Plan. The intent of Applewood Baptist Church is to execute the Master Plan in two phases over a period of 15 years. The first phase will add another education building in 1-3 years. The second phase will add a new worship center in about 10 years after Phase I is completed. Current Conditions of the Site The land currently contains a blacktop parking lot, with three closely-spaced curb cuts within approximately 250' for access to and from 32nd Avenue, and an education building built in 1984/1985. The building is quite nice but the view from the street is plain. Further back, beyond the education building, there is open space to Lena Gulch, and neighbors to the east have an unobstructed mountain view. Future Site Improvements Space Allotment 8% Combined footprint of all three buildings 457o Parking and drives 47% Landscaping The Master Plan meets, and in some cases, exceeds current guidelines of the City of Wheat Ridge for various elements such as parking, landscaping, site lighting, drainage, traffic circulation, and emergency services. In all cases, every effort was made to minimize any negative impact development might have on neighboring properties and to enhance the community with a thoughtful, park-like, setting. It is our hope that this plan offers, not just a better facility to meet the needs of the Baptist congregation, but also that it be perceived as an asset to the whole community. In the final plan, the two education buildings and the worship center will be situated forward (south) on the site for easy recognition and a more attractive streetside presence. The blacktop parking lot will be replaced with attractive landscaping and sidewalks along 32nd Avenue. Parking areas behind the buildings (to the north) will be low profile, gently sloping down toward Lena Gulch for optimum drainage and for minimal obstruction to the mountain views. The parking area will have landscaped island separations and will be screened from neighboring property though the use of fencing and landscaping, Almost half of the land is dedicated to lawn, trees, shrubs and walks. The 300'- 400' area from the parking lot to Lena Gulch will remain open space. Exterior lighting will take advantage of the latest technology with fixtures that have a light source that not only efficiently illuminates a large area, but can not be seen from 70' away. Traffic circulation will be improved by reducing the 3 existing curb cuts to 2, well- separated (420'), curb cuts off 32nd Avenue. Fire lines and a wide drive will be added and will eventually be looped around and through the site to provide optimum access for emergency vehicles and smooth traffic flow for all Church activities. The infrastructure for each phase will develop only as each structure is built. Details follow. PHASE I - NEW EDUCATION BUILDING (1-3 YEARS) A. Purpose: To provide badly needed classroom, and meeting space. It will contain a kitchen, classrooms, a fellowship hall and normal supplementary spaces. It will connect to the existing education building by a lobby that will have an elevator. This also improves handicap access in the existing education building. B. $^tyle: The new education building will be a repetition of the existing Colonial style red brick education building with white trim. C. Fire Safety: The new education building will be fully sprinkiered as is the existing education building. A new fire hydrant will be added at the north end along with a new fire line which will be extended in Phase IL A 30'-wide drive for emergency and service vehicles will be started but not completed until Phase 11. D. Parking: 193 spaces will be added to the north and east of the new education building in a cul-de-sac arrangement. Note: The existing parking lot in the southwest corner area of the site will remain as is until Phase 11 is initiated. E. . Exterior Lighting: Layout not only meets City guidelines, but every effort has been made to minimize the impact to neighbors. The 24' pole fixtures are spaced 90' from property lines. The actual light source is designed so that it can not be seen from 70' away. F. Landscape: Only those elements of the Master Landscape Plan that pertain to the new education building and parking areas will be installed. G. Drainage: Most run-off will continue to flow to Lena Gulch as it does now. The existing detention pond will remain. All other flows will follow the Master Drainage Plan. H Traffic: Traffic flow will continue as it is now, using the existing three curb cuts and will not change until Phase II. I. Utilities: Water and sewer requirements for Phase I will use the existing utilities without impact. PHASE U - NEW WORSHIP CENTER (10-13 years after Phase I is completed.) A. Purpose: To accommodate a growing congregation. This worship center is currently projected to seat 1,840 parishioners, provide office space, choir facilities, and auxiliary spaces. Detailed plans are not firm as the needs of the congregation 13 years hence could change. It could be smaller if the congregation doesn't grow as much as anticipated. A larger footprint is highly unlikely. However, 31,000 square feet of space is reserved for this purpose and cannot be increased. B. Stvle: The worship center will most likely depart from the style used in the education buildings and be more contemporary in character. It will fall within the Baptist Guidelines for church design. C. Fire Safety: The worship center will be fully sprinklered. A second hydrant will be added and the fire line will be extended to the west and loop back to 32nd Avenue. The 30'-wide drive for emergency and service vehicles will be completed. D. Parking,: Add 460 spaces. Education parking will move from the south to the north parking lot. The existing parking lot in the southwest corner of the site will be demolished and the area will be attractively landscaped. E. Exterior Lighting: Layout not only meets City guidelines, but every effort has been made to minimize the impact to neighbors. The 24' pole fixtures are spaced 90' from property lines. The actual light source is designed so that it can not be seen from 70' away. F. Landscape: Complete those elements of the Master Landscape Plan for buildings, drives, parking and setbacks. The southwest existing parking will be eliminated and the 32nd Avenue frontage will be landscaped. G. Drainage: Complete the Master Drainage Plan. The existing detention pond will be expanded in size and will move to the northeast corner of the site. All drainage will be directed to the north at Lena Gulch. R Traffic The existing three curb cuts will be reduced to two, with a 420 foot separation between them. A new curb cut will occur at the southwest corner. All traffic will flow in a loop through the site. We would anticipate new crosswalks would be coordinated with these access points. 1. Utilities: Water and sewer requirements for Phase I and Phase H will use the existing utilities. No expansion is expected to be required. 4 K:!5z PM .i r. ' i< ~T I11 \ 1 III i S ITE. PLAN 5~«:i .~.o Ao Y Y IV o M 1 James E. Moorhead Architects - Planners 9731 Cypress Point Circle Phone ,qlrr9 S)TE MASTER PLAN Fln APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CuUP, 11200WEST 32nd AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO t liar ~ T. .t - i i F~ i- . A 1. LOT 1 I LOT 2 RIM = 5418.07 I RIM = 5420.04 I _ J A INV (15") IN = 5410.07 INV IN = 5410.84 INV (18") OUT = 5409.77 INV OUT = 5410.74 _r..~...- _ ~I sS s SS ~ S ~ vii S, ~ , ~ Z _ 1 SS S ~ S / ~ 21, BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION, ~,f ~ \ ~ ~ ~ RIM = 5421.2 i \ ~ ~ ~ , INV IN =X5412..67 ~ / / ~ ~ (t~~`~~ INV OUT 5412.57 ~ ~ JF SECTION 28, \ ~ 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN I ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ l ~ \ ~ l ~ ~ 1 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " C i ` ` \ ` L A GULCH ~ ~ .1 R .1 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ` ~ ` ;~k ~ ` 10 YEAR ~c~00D ZONE 1 OF TRACT 22 AND THE W-1 f 2 OF TRACT LOCATED IN THE NW-1 /4 OF 7 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6 C 8 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFER SHEET 1 OF 1 - ss ss ss \ I ~ i \ A~PROXIMAI~E ~ l 8 ~.ANITARY RIAA - ~id1Q R1 I \ \ \ \ ~ 1 1 ~.t11~. ~ ~....-..~-.~T ~ 1~ ~ \ \ ~ ~1 ii ~ , ~`~3;1 ~ tHJtRN.tIV 1~ INV IN = 5411.01 d- ~ PG. INV OUT = 5410.1 ~jcn ~ 1 ~ ~ , \ , BK. 939, ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ Ring = 5421.0? ~ ~ e t ~ I ~ , ~~r~`1i°~ , ~ 1k cam` ~ INV~ IN = 543.12 \ ~ \ ~ II ~ 1 ~ ~ f I a CONCRETE 1 SPP ~ ~ / ~ I \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ PARKING LOT r ~ } ~ ! i - - \ SS z x ACCESS AND ~c ~ f / / + / ~ ~ = _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ I ~ ~ \I19I P~RI~IN(~\SbA~E~ L ~ MAINTENANCE ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ \ , ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 10 PSC~ UTILITY \ I EASEMENT i ` V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E A S- M~ ENT ~ 'r R~G N0. F020826~9 ~ , ~ ~ RIM = 5422.28 ~ ' ~ ~ I N V I N = 5410.08 ~ i ~ ~ x ~ rr r. J~ 1 INV OUT = 5409.48 / ~ iX i ~ ~ / ~ ._r- : t~- IN ~ '~S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r i RIM = n I x\ ~ INV IN ~~2 ~ x ~ INV OU 3 TARP EWER I ~ ~ ~ ~ S x 16 SANI S ~ ~ ' 1 16 SAN 7 t r f EASEMENT ~ ~ ~ ~ \i/ ~ r~ 1 ~ EASEME BK. 1616, PG. 158 ~ I N 1 / ~ ~ t s s e~ i 1j S" \ ~ ~ v / / ~ ~ ~ N ~ BK . 96 a i ~ ~ ~~~j~~ ~ I :;t t' b t I ~ ~ i~ ~ RIM = 5422.75 I - _ _ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ INV IN = 5414.55 - N I ~ I N V OUT = 5414.45 - '-P~ I INV= 5417.95 ~ N f LEGEN D 4~ 1 -,_,o o a o WOOD FENCE y - x- x- x- x- x- x- WIRE FENCE ~ i' • u.. - - -w- - -w- - - WATER LINE e - - -a u ss ss SANITARY SEWER LINE ~ t t -----sD-----SD----- STORM GRAIN LINE ~ ~k _ ~ GAS LINE s i.rc - I off OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE st i., 1 uE UNDERGRQUND ELECTRIC LINE ~ GUY WIRE pd WA I tK MANFiVLt ~L o~ ! f/ U'~°,.;~ -SIN LUU1 A I 0: UV t'.M. _wz 6. NOTICE. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION CAN WATER METER DOUGLAS R. BERLIN ~TE PLS 34594 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT 'ECT MOUNTAIN STATES ENGINEERINGi~/ Consultants in CMI Engineering & Land Surveyior MOUNTAIN STATES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. P.C. 12860 W. Cedar Drive, Suite 102 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 (303) 987-3980 (303) 987-3988 Fox r • o'dxk C Rae"reed at I .f.. - - - - 7 ) S -9 t'YJ]r'? 7 ...Re "rL . I f s V. Reception No.'s -At j ZHIS DEED, Made this 6th day of March t~'Q in the year of our Lord one thousand nine. hundred and s ixt y-nine between LILLIAN P. 14UNSAKER of tab City and County ot Denver and state of Colorado, of the first part, and APPLEWCCD EAPT IST CHURCH, -5. q a non-profit xeorporstio. organlred and existing under and by virtue of the Inns of the s.KU of Color ado of the second part: RECORDER'S STA>il' v ~ ~ N W That the said party the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of WI1'NESSETH, DOLLARS. Fifty-five Thousand to s end part, th" reraipt w.*.e:rot I. to the said part y of the first part In fiend paid by the said Party of °d b hcse presents wh s eycC, u Y hatch, condensed and acknowledged, bap granted, bargauted, sold and conv ` grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said party of the second part, its success"' and asvigm foravep all of the following described lots or parcel of lead, situate, lying and bein, I. th.A County of Jefferson - and State of Colored", to-wit: The. 'rest 1/2 of Tract twenty-one (21), and the east one-half ofTract twenty-two (22), - BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION, Except easement described in Book 939 at Page 408 of the records of the Clerk and. Recorder of Jefferson County i 1 - i i TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditements and appurtenances tF.r: nto `c!ov:i":' in rayd all appertaining, and the reversion and recensions, remainder and remainders, rants, issa of and rstip , either u party of the first pcri in law- the estate, right, title, intemsq claim and demand whatsoever of the said or equity, of, in and to t. hove bargained premises, with the hereditm.rnte and nPyn'ttenclea- TO H:\VE AND TO HOLD the said premises .bore bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the Second part, its snecessors and assi~me forever. And the. said part of the first part, for said party of the sec her self, her heirs,- execute', and administrators, do es covenant, grant, ba:gon. and egved to and with the said party o1 the second part, its successors and assigns, that at the time of LF.e am:ez ling and dvolueel and these Presents, she is well seized of the premises above conveyed, n.n of good, arc. Perfect, in law, in fee sir mIc, and he s good right, full power urld lawful authority ible estate of and con th grant, bargain, grant, sell and convey the same in manner and for sesare ntss and Itinevmabrnnecs of whatever kindor nature all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, . soover, except taxes for 1969 due and payable January 1, 1970 and exce easements and restrictions of record and special tax assessments, i. any, and the above bargained premises In the quiet and peaceful Possesslea of the said Party of the second Part, its any thereof, the said Fart of the first Part shell and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, Th. Bald part y of the first part has hereunto set her hand and seal the d., and yea4 first above written. l _ - SEAL Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence o1 _[SEAL] T ATE OF COLORADO ~ Denver C Y t }X County or ln.'ry] t~4, : •t was so rowledged before me this qtr day of Ma rrh dltu~Fr~Jt:t'.9Kt-`7Li3.1'~:n~. Hunsaker. fifi{ ~a~ qq' a } ~ a«@alht~'~ht nd'gtdbffieial send. bar n t N n nt r t e c., r rs J cn s s ~e o ^°t no N 9 2 w.tna__ eat.. ro conronnrmn , rn ¢t rz a t- l.fisa`'~"i4'r., W GC :a V W 'J mQ Z Recorded et o'elock_M., ReceDtlon No. _ V APPLEW'OOD INVESTORS, a Colorado partnership, whoseaddressis 13605 Braun Road, Golden, Colorado, Countyof Jefferson and Stateof Colorado RECORDED IN COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO RECEPTION NO, 85079@45 08/21/x5 15:40 3.00 for the consideration of Ten and No/ 100 Dollars, in hand paid, hereby sell(s) and quit claim(s) to APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, whose address is 11200 West 32nd Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Countyof Jefferson and State of Colorado , the following real property, in the Countyof Jefferson , and State of Colorado, to wit; The west half of Tract 22, Brookside, According to the recorded plat thereof, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, i with all its appurtenances alsc 'Town as street and number 11375 West 32nd Avenue. Signed this dayof ,19 85. APPLEWOOD INVESTORS, a Colorado pa r t:nershlp, By: - Edwin t. Edlund, Gen ral Partner STATE OF COLORADO, I SE. fss. The to egoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a, "p' dayof ,19 85 by Edwin 0. Edlund, as General Partner uP Applewood investurs, a Colovadu partnership. My commission expires CC'sg.rul le Witness "lily hand and official seal c..i'ir r' _ ..e...2 l..R~;. /y&, xe,..r weirs. I/ No.898. Dort ctwtn o[[o~e.n n..- e..am.ev.aa.w.vvw.xne.... w..,va.co am. _,rwm>sco_..n 3I 78 b9 b° ° 7 f - o Vi a A o r.+ o p ° r~- U as i-7 m P4 -C4 t~.i e•~'1 a ILE0 I19 F .a N m a p m q~ o m G a •mV m q ro 0 1 tf'~ Lf1 - Qf~ o m w v a a q o y d o 'G•,O O m y a O iL d ad a u ppRn l d B ro a b o y vi Y o .o m q d .a - C v o A _ i ' > Imo. Mii 7 N Q Y m w H d U F d ro m A a y a 1:1 w a Vmi ° .dC Cm w d a ow '.r-0 EO N G .h7 .L Z Q , f m 12 29 i 1~ '69 ~~ii~.y !2 ° l o m m • 6p " T'.. a m 6n m 5 d w M m O1 A w U ,iy p d d d l~ Q1 d g c- y,{ 4;yvsi. W _ • aI xd, rd. ~O~ ° Y W Y 6n w p .q G~ N . W s•!J I Jtf m m d d d G- RECGRIJk o I p, qN O N M Z9 Y A 7 .o F a ro y" y a m Y m 7y 0 1 d m r4 1J '0 a m d a is °i a wm .a (6 ro m ° yw ` s JAMES N Y C R Frr r, i d w ay B o o d a °o' w B~ g W COUkTY LERKmi:i:t7Rl7fR I f..' y p O~ m o d °a a ,a 'c °a' W w r-I X tA„ m A o o: a Yi q 1 t° D. d .-1 3 M X Y m Y Y d o m o P, ° N .4.1 0) w 7 d o A'. p .A-. c a. v y 'Jr-4N q' yQ q ` •O m ° m p q i 0 N v °Ji X r-1 o m N°i a G o 6q w A qN m rl m o W F a 0) 4J 0 .C v ti 'q m y w R '.s m 00 W d r~\` V w m •O .a. - ro! d as G C O U Y m" a d W ~'n ° .Ya Am, C E •,4 A q 0 A ' ..1 8 x m 1 d D, m q O a PQ U I •d 1 3 a d a d a a. ro o m U Y 0 > a W y G rd. w: v .G a Y q h a ° a oa y a q H! o ro 94 -P J-) Jr y aq b b G w m ro ¢ d m g C y b 1 o q '4'I N v "m q A mti a a m o. ON 6 - 'O ..-i w m ro 0 l y ro m r- 14 W C w .q an d .o D Y d N w" r6 I w 0 m CO a U rp 0 '.y q d .ate 0 6' o m C ami m A rO ID q N C G d O Q Y O Y Y A o w z d q m 3 m a O m I a 1 m w d a Y m .V w m e m m a a A ° ° w v ?a m $ C w h m 'JV m H m w I °A., `5, 3 .4 V d~ w y d m O Wd D Y ~Y m w0 41 Q U O [ti •rl r0 ro d o A d a d m d S Q+TJ W q uD X H o r- w I m ° d y 11 z w w G a w w d m o vi o m m W " Cr m U m Wo V d I,da ' a•° U m W O U O O m m oA'' a mro.°.9 m w wL2 w - d aw Y m~6 m O H m u m •o Y O A A❑❑ m" m m a w m p d d d n `A" w N I 00 LL m°w w co a s w m d w .Y. d M o W of C U d a Y n" m o pa w w i p w a o H W H R7 w a ro m g D Y m a ° w w ~m q o o 0 1 t0 q U .--1 'J W q A o m a ro ow u ro d w ° w o m l m Q a I A m w W m H .N a W .m B d g W m w a y a q q F ° v O o y I O& Q C .C a •o a m ro a 8 w "J' W q a Y w° x • o q "O$ m I a a" ° a N a 'J w m d °m y d O Pa a o y m w ^ w° .qa fk w W y I .mq F;o 8 m \ F U) a W W A a m o. m o m m w m .a m. >r rod a a o 'd W a s I q m ,b r -I O m 0 0 o v .,y w m Io C w a a X z i 00 i G.Y. 'J W o ')•e I p m W m Y N ro d a d 0~ O o d O B pe 43 m ' 1 ' rra q W •V .U Q a O(1 w o p m 'q^m :d u `6 " N B d m r1 •,4 d p AN Q O m m ~i U2 N ri B m l d W- F m m H Q a d by m a mm .m. 4-1 'd m Y w O tL ro 4 • A F a m m of n .m+ m" Y FC u m q z q 4-4 a P. o a m co 13 C1' '0 w a d w g m q w U Cm am. d O d w o O d ro an d - 3 a .Y. !Z w a q A A y a°a v m '.a O •,4 y yy Ad :H A 4 o a .T. ° a V 0 .T. p$4 .'o+ m o w to ° m O O a a 0 u d m B ar 2 U W w am an d E w Y O p, g ,w ~j 0 c l0 A w m (1+ w C d 'q O a a 0 U 131 U .d q Ys o A 's, d F4 q A m yJ A w y W V m F q Y e.x - V z Y . ° I o d m d w m .L W. X m a a o d p a.7 o d v y m m w q O D. .O W a G ra~'•"'~`' o y m +A' B ro m m w a O Fy a D„ °o " a m G'a y O G w o A d w H .IJ W W a s P, 0.l 4Y. d w d W o y q ' GU Wx ro w. U Eiixo aetT q u o . A ° q w 0 t 0 0 0 " a m D qti A ro w m m .a 0 m X w ro m w W ° '73Ym at v i~ Y "T~ a Y C O o 'G W d Y F q m •rl q w m ° W E--~y'© v t- O q m" al D, a C"" ~'-r w a d ~•Q, ° N F m o m W A. F" y^ °u A 'o m d-I V as o mb p~ H m mh d a m aV m a m m ro ` d y aZ w a d.4 A a o m w m o a' A m v qm '*e o ff m m W > d A C ,.C a m = 1' m w}. rp o w a m rl m W m q D. m m d ro d ro d ro Fa o m- F W o q d W o d W d d G F1 Cr9R? - B r,X 'c mA "'e adi ~W ~a m W A d °~~Aa W R eo w d q o z O d d 0 V? Y D. w dm d m tC d a m m O m ~O •'"c, N A a ' bo m iFi rJa m o A A O ^e3 Y O m b a W A d m y.^ ~j, r (>,r, j t an ;m . d d o q d N d A y+ w E d C Iy w w d d o d a A d d F7 m d ~s °!'P d f~ SS ° c r.i . A p o '>r+ to W A 'Oi q o q d y .d a m a g w D m ~Y d w q s 'a > r? g d a V m Y ri z w q 0 GL d .C A A p °i d m C a d d .0 6q 9,Y fa` l;( {'i E"I .q. .da V o d o Ga a°+ .da hw0 U Na o m Y Y bD '~N °w a m W m 0 m U'~+x`r~ " a*~`x+ /'"o f '~✓r--~,. a+n k+SB`..pe.....h..we.. at ,'v. 6961 L aVa~pQ3 xln T -tEnooCTT' .Ea-8 _ . . o; s3uama}ugs asa, axn3n;_puas..-, - (03 am3ai'i q -goad I -4naaa sa~~x I 92ug ---._.----_.._......-x1oog m . . papxoaax step puu ..w........... =3(aota,o 41 6T .Q T ..";0 sup a, I pall; sum ;uamnj4suc sig3 3ugg sypxaa sgoxaq I I •ss { l `0' avuo'IOO 30 OSaSs OIL k._ R w P4 5 3 2 4 1 6 1 I H n%' P w w COl?NTY G F JEFFE RSON ° iy.G v F oI- M g STATE OF COLOR ADO ~ CIE*_D IN T HE OFFI CE ON i sJa v °F N t J C3 G 7 . . " C x. ~ pp u17 l l31 a , I»o i ° d y ~z C z 00 cil x 1" i ' y ° w ~ ¢ G ACORDE D I H ' m G LL rt .T O _ ° 1 G H E F C Bfl p1 COUNTY CO RK&RECORDER 0 cu a0 a 4t d 1 1 00 ~ ~ ro E ro d x 1 I •ri m H d Y m 1 1 W'(7' .p F1 a p .~y 1 1 v+'C1 ° d y .r^' d N ^ k 1 1 1 1 / I ''I a U ~ w m~ 60 ro Y N J..I Y a m Y Y x N 1 1 H F R m t~ N d o o ca H U A I . .--i N ° w a O N P. O ; o O. O C~ > 00 td w o 0 x b H 0 v O F o w ~ o o o a ro z 3 S + H d i y = w W a g 00 o I o ti O U o Q z ~:x a W P w U U W H ° Q 1. 1 b W . O W m R a w ro ro U w 0 m . , d Y ~ o ' ro " N ° O y A' N O E i N m d w m q W G O ro ° q o ro U y b% w 3 W z 1 L> s ° ° o o ?tn N H H S H a m . -7 cz ro 0 ^ H H F m A } O o o o E > r-1 [n P co O W ¢ O co a= y o d q JJ O W rl W b E•°^ ~ F E i- w y y ° ° d a ° ° I C w o d W G O ro ' y q° O G O M Q Q 1 1 rn v p H F' y m> F z X m t H N A •N W'lY. l d •N W o d ca ro o w Q b W H a N L F f 1 u ,o P m o v w 01 O Q ~ a 0 " qq H m o a m m O Q + O O C W d Hw z .Q 1 p co m O 3 y~rl W w .,x, G > O.i 1 7 • ° F k7 .4 p O 11 r0 d F H z i y , ~ W m U cF,t H G V1 O W C 1 r 5 N M E" tk ro W2 L4 W ' k 'O w ..S W , d y' Uro 'z PQ I I n !l]' d 0 ~f G = 9 O W.' ' 0.' 6 a w ro O 0z r W C W A al H ' r7 y i a ro P. My w0.9 ~ = 0 C y H ti . F k o p N N W 9 ' N w w W ci . N N W b F E W ro a W Z" m .m o . E• Hd o P. of a, m ' , C ' C Fa a Y d 3 U w d a S O .--1 E W F W rn '-I d a .,a H + ^ n O m p W rl i-7 Z p N O ro ' m w G N ~ d W U U o O ° P a G ti . U _ W ro h G rn a p x a " Z . F O ro m W p ' p V] r1 J ° F N w .o d rtii . d 41 - A C 6 P F F o 0 P m 0> > W PL P. H m 0 o U N w a W ~5 ° <Yi z o N w .-1 ro 10 m o p m m o O O W H W .L L b v u U a H N O • u O' 'O W ro p H O O 0 a O U 0 w O W W Y ~ O co 7 L V1 •M N O m' G W W W : Wo O h,H w O •H ri > G U N W 3 •'~i Y W 0 C H L P c.E PyAC F'dY ro vro roFad dd P A P.°"kro mAmv'm m ai N o cm+wi 0w H p F uo,1 P. 'j Rk' ^N .dr mY^ N<A., sa+WA FURd° NHy9tiC w ° C Ororo d N o oow mw d.na yw ro xd C .G p Fx q+A.,m o F vro cu dix.,<N jo'° w H °wwk P'°w vi H C O °W wN'A'' y .o mwY -9mp4 H.pp udx, a o. p,4 by m p9" GoP V d °,oa u V"'~A m`'~ Hdd AdY CYO dPbod ~mdA+F'F °m<' E 4 rorom °tiR A O O A .r F W vl m H „,,H 2', O x d dY .U.d Oxm roa tdw.oR weEroo i,°Iw{•'O . e~mY bp00iH m Y wpm od' AY wY.., q a C A YwA~ a CLd Y o a N ky 3+'w X00 ymia ayvoF°p,, ru. °3PE'°0 -o p, YOA.IjO CzCOY .0,1 UA HY WVmE H[LNwyOd•da~w ro aro NY dyk Pa ¢ FWG P^.Ay m..°. A>m Y,kw b °.C P'w ~'CW NCd.mo y'y o'0'- 0 o' Cx'~kw po.o N'mp Nmnm. C'P~ro Cda,,Nboa am E d•r^'d °f. >0. h^ 0, P, m 0 w ° xm"roomoo P.w AY Kroxmro°pai P~dma my$•k °yl ro Y Ow aw u a o R •C O k m m ~'m go d Hv4 •O m H C wa uo o a q om m pYro FEYF E k, . ro O wwdm b m .A-,° dAN ° 0 d °w F FpYA p71y 0 is aH dmdti FHW vroi°Hmhp dyx,,A YF v 0.50 CLY Y mYw OH.^N r m'f'.dm HdHYk N W b0^ d d 0 d r Wda,YdYVOr,': W OFro OHGv1N°Ymko"td ad Cl °[dw ~.-0 N F'S"imOO rood .y ro dwxo~tiwyA-oq W yFO ad'orow7aadiEayti °A m~pdF o b •❑douYa A8 C FC' moW a°aN w q uw v>.G d.L l~VJ~J!',, •dc m•wOw w"m HA:- o a .°G H~p~w 4Lym 0 C ro•^d rox '1yN Y.C~.~Rm roW-HOOHY=,r-„b •Od Ndm Y+>° mGY V N '-ro +°PGv,+.,.' Y o oy u H Y ro60., "oY maroo ro ~.om F,~'ooy'^NW - m bq r°'N dro C P0p'dHmm.tigmo'°'~~~v.cmvu m EmaEyH f' E G~mro N'~ro V Itl N H Ca,,O Rd '-'C C.V ~ro Y H C d PmlyW a~ P d2rorok c°i FCo ° dAy a.d NHdp Fx dy m my_~y NHymC q o wwy Cm P. yp p~Y,`~o PEA(„iNroV Y mcdiN 'CtiA mN Nm0 aY.dj m+O.`+, w'o F,o 0 H NHti H0, Ero _ N ydk N ma..A• °1wU ° PFO roro Ni°.w,Ci. Nw m o hog';! °O'C %0 W U ywroti°Aa 'o WHtp PCvS pyR^U NUly 'oC p, 0~" VHro pwyro.C m m api~NN aAF. G •`a E W CA G. p.,• d aF Hrood d Y ..u R F uw m Yddro wa wHCdAy.,roF m°,4x$row tl1 v d rop;a°F,w oo v.°. ' qw ° dp fL wad m 7 oli k= aw v <°a H d Hw w E A m C.Y. o F H o is N O H U A W o ro y.E Y F W H Cf U w o g w m W P a"" m.E:p H d d s: x GL a k w ro o y w O o m Y N y,~ „ m d U o[ d. w o w d N A d o TJ w F V m O' t3 Y •dC ro ~ m ,al o mm P~ OC x°av ° OY aY dpro Pwk o N vIF UYGo N .dC m Rrow mmp~ a H,kro dy'''Arodp Ytdp.2„CC6qo ywuWm W d.p"m~N° d ~aFYR,w .-.o ~m ~w . x ,i H O m moo'°y" s. a °W U.°~°C°1 w'o"sY. GAF m-rowY~.buro.° d d l S° +w d b.an" ~m^md d U YwU°lOU wwG NR 60 tdrw ommA gc°i~ro °..°.w Viro, o q oq Nw ~kaH 40 0 HOn ...h,q FYHU0'0G-.oFH:dm7~p Cis :tiYxu7 Y " G E w ro m F .y PF K.5of A o G H s O -w ro d s,'C m .C .d F N A c N d dk,ro C'mya+.°. mm~' ..~ro~ GHm oSLmwx am Bm Ukro N ooY bUopy E F „A+m'd ~:da S_Q H"m wH W.- -o mY„GY rP.mmN ,°v P•`~mYN m m HmA..F. op Edro .y-P, OH °.Ed OW aYbmrocNi"dH Np•a dvFFbOw dFU ENFA vi dpA.a PI m 3 Pyro ro w•C... HY,ti•rodc~wFVOp ° C °mmbP ~bo A ° Yakioxi.w °.°bo CA.,C .'d.EmE Www Nroa.°Nw <Cymm a o w. U~Hw Y v w .F,d PProm .pHd C oa, !=wwd koo~m off F H.,m,Am w Q i. °oFO•o^g mcmi y wA OEi U~wtime Hro V ro0A~k^w E•°m A o5 °~+F'O'F ~o .-1N ro H ro r ro ro U .C I~^C m y p,ro m a .b o ro Y H a d d p Y H p H m F.,-i p d F'wd° Rd m 'o vim " -d 5+~ roHd PF dmY o..F. ~„P, .~❑Ed°pw N Nwdy omw xi Z °'d .YF, Nm Nv m Ndv bo•H Y~+m oR dwaamH N mbnvrom v N Yy'P P'odi°+aHi O m aro °C A,d Hro^N C N'd yo v omm N"A'`b ~'~ro aw~m m'~ww d yy ~smaro d fL'y cdy F H osd. is dw aimaN o ~dP mH mwwm Ko -rot P%!99 ro o6 " k +m+y'po2 'may F ~SY'.RwOgro(.'cJw Yro GI oYN pPiyy HFrEti°.kNUmi '^~+•ro^Nro`°.d mm O Y EYWromx Cd C' H C °jy ro H ai rHJ m sa .p cdi'^N w o p w c°i o~oi.o°: ^'O Ei . '.F. o 7`I'~A W Y mwx'?Jx m o G4 W by oPOA., paps w°~mw o ,royHm Pm"<ti Hdd m.,.%m~ wQ myromyo K d yydoy.~'.Ed C roa, H,. ro m U oC'A C F°: °x.FmCp d'o'e ix-+ mrod,n F w ro W dd Q' hp o°i <Cpy'O F.Y EAdH a owe ro">aSryY d69oC yro g'°p° Plo a d vVoidm°CmaA, .fir o G d o o ro y Hyy y U.n m ro doE u v m d o ro 0 P 3 F a"i •G P, p❑py m w w w t ~md^R P.„>d+O'.'WYP m, A C Fro O',^ H'~UN dH up E.,v00 N ro N P p N.Emn'AP~oPP Q R wOc!OGpOdmm o°° k w•FI;CHd,L.djNdypoX^ F o Hdm m,.,QYmP H wpm F HdF-o fL m ,p aro q+'> m o mm•oro iar F4N k N,id',mNN.diFN Croro O roYVi ro. y`EhroA VEO oxorox woW F'aH ti y roRmCNAAO Pr i, V x A d t3 d E W TJ m a a 600 [6 m d Y w m Y Y m Y m o a o wA ° W Y Y Y'C N m Y Y Y 0 Y d m P4 S1 V 7 1 y m C C C :A N m m O a.i0 m Y H N Or g 9 v 0 W H p 0 mNYW mam F Ny aY > O y V >a•-Oi O m N 0-9 m b ./mJ y h wy H C .04r m 0 a W mx o m ny CD Wk Q M O ym-vm 0 ~ y C F O N om H N Y atw J) o y m C k R C v N y m w m O w w C ~ G m m FRm~ Yro ^ d 00 y > m'a a~°Fmg WA W dV mYU p M N > N Y d m y$'„b mro U m v F C ~m,W tdv m Y a-r ^d xV O m m >,•Cro m m mro Hp {ip 'd O,„•y- roro Y w h H H y q v xx x'^ o ip:fl C m F m w F O O at . v p .FO HyIN yy ym mC FmO F'v.nF N iE ..^m mo„Y. t0 c6 v ro R v a mm ym om 'OFH m w Ao ai R m y o O y k v R ~i v o R g m m..r H m•O ON ^O itl 4Q O U NA F'~F' Day YOy W"'ro00 'O RU V'4x Rm mN Pi iaJ Ra. W °v Vy o rowC mx Oy N HC V OyC •C F x p o N 1. 72 F au . ~ A 'a a>ai O> N F ''T21 P [RJ pl U 0 C' N ~ ° C -A r o°~ mm,ti y ip mFm OH av° yYy F-mO yYVOy p>i a °ro m y W y R i6 H m p F C ro •-6 ai F .C 00°0 00~ EmH o°y Nvs°.~oo ~y sv.C°m m~N•tl mm ym promCp '„vg oWW °ym plv0 "ommm Ra'5 FNO >m O QY NFi,.d xm...l U4 Hmmyy0m m'Y FO ~dm~ Y Y N U N H R x w Y y y yiy Fm ymNm+ omx C'°^H •~oN xCHxmv>' v"'1o~H'PNUS F x0 u m°w m F,° HRy :pR X10+°aN svey Hp PaH%° OmR~ a N•N O ti O° 0 ti m m x i by aav da~>'°A Wm m0N ° m C0°o oroY VYHVam•C m•am ty ' F .V. m O O gg@x N ° U H Y m O F a w O O N O ybOm vlo q R'C H ~Ry° v R k o~ a °•F° Pao ~NPa O.yxiFa PaN v o'o A FW roy.y> v Pi v F •°a C my mYC H o 0-0,F H o Y v m O S4 a O ro Om0mro mF ro m Hm Qava o y.x-,roo _v Ndm ~-.m RC a'maHY~O am om °'O-' H W N U O U„ H N N T1 pa U a a 0 O D U OI O*m w x60roF V m a ~ yy U a> t%.^^.G AHW Y;~ F Yy H.iC µ1myY mm °x mR"vm °ym mar OYroY O°x NNN mF OmW Oti Fx0 OTJ O'Na m>> m dy ~ya+G.~~G P'eH ro amu 'a' y° myxc, Yq.m.+mw D, Nw~Hm.,.,.^R RY... o ~.nq~jv O A0 ...ti W Rwm x69w yUO0 o eHi>wo y+m'm E t'k mR aam NRro y 3wo CH yN ">mA Ry mx P, Hm R vc°i%'romm mo aw vF'dim um m NWCV W.4 Q, Niue `'~jZ ax. c,iYw Pero PRo.~ro'id ~.~a 0. Am m •C Q'i .ammo N" C..^. mm~NNF V Cu a J)b2 03 -w 11 O a w~ Y m N v' R F "i Rro. d N ro F m y q u `p v y° 0 C a v H v b F.7 Gm Imo N'CF Pw 3'WNw~dw OmYyvvI~°w FO3roaC 0~F a"~y °F mN ~NH°.°mYw mxd6➢yOa.^ Rm°p>,, O }'i'C F U O F m y W m y U H Y'a td m "y y 't.i N Y n'J aC O V> m .n +i J~ vW."°m o C~~..>. Co W mR F vv 'd'0 amO~~N m. H m Rtd,_; m.W 'o o R m m TAY i-7 H Hro C a F.-rY~" a m w m •q >a•y'^ v m o 0 m y 0 C m 0000 o w 0 y v 3e.+ o R , kro x m ymd ma~° o w °'Hao ~j m0? ok 0m.~ QI m" A 04 .Cm`JaA ~xy C. W ~~'yt,"3x W,p M>v°Om owx aa0dvm r OA owM Rwvro om" y7. aNm wW0 'J'Imomvd-Km I Wo'0M ox ^iJ w^mwoou mP oW yro>',. Z"oPa6mo'xm4-iromHpR,vR Y •o'y NOH v~ vwk ~.n R H+0 Nm°nH axro WSJ 0 0 Nm o"vY-,° ~ aYV v yl xf.7 a o xro Pl Pk rom'[ ma F y-~o P'p my vm~- dx a 0. 0, 0- 0 N o m 0 rd N O W x a m ti ° m a' >.,n 64 w 0° w 0 m °mON °"N~;m romy oN'd C,a aim ~yncm~m~Ud N am">~H m Y uC ~Ax Yv,^~xx CA yam, v....-a pv 'm aimsitu 3^° w uN am Rro.F UN£am~°, Rro Hwxw H Fd 60 .b.Q v P' a W" o:G b ro ro R m F .fa z o >,ro F a 'y v o y;~ Y 1-- v a m 10. 1 %ro•n,-7 w m^ m uH N~ 'x'vm ma0y°om mm Cy~m c^°imYo m H R m m ; 9 m y 7'P Q, - a m" o m ~ m v. ~ ro ro y m o v p, V v ^a P'xj a N'a'W " y ow e,- x m x Y n m m y W P'~xV " a O m v Y F O O bu R w y O~ m F FJ m m° H N 0 roV q RF N;~Yro td (Y, •°iDO.~N50 y 0 V a roY s''aQNmH w.. :t. y:NOY v xw W yAa C v °y~a-0 mWF °..V. FH mO Zmm4yH OamOmR°NO Fi OZ. 'C> Ycvi H6 vx A'0 do..•>', 0A mmoovi~y ~mmm w.. owv~aa a,~`" mc°~ rCJmN N~ ~R A. P. <J aH cap a 00 NO P,0 cmi Pa k Gw ORlU 0, X y d p 0 0 m Y ^y FroY F Y yam m WOO v'C H m O d N ti 0E ~ pii. x y o JHi.a Pam P' A v a O mPi -m m m Y m m vxv.+ pwy. A ~x F m x yA O V F ro vOi.dro ~ Ox ° m m WOO m°Ym0 Y O m~ ',H vp m R N y >,0 mmm Od ~xR W iRU m ~ Am'~H O la H'v~ % la :O O m Y w o u ! OFaNNd N O 1 v N row 1 m W u d sk I m m w y.mc ~i mp .C m a-y as y 1 H m a fQ Y N m I ti~ w m O m m v.. o o w y .F+~ll r m m N y O N' J) m mxx H 'bw qw.k' m WN C)>a0 m° U O U,m v m v^a ~y mA a'°rmn ~ vH~+m R 0000 ' N o Wm .C roPv a d p y m a 0 u x° 1 v N F m ~ c°iAd'I R0~ v v m 'o. 1 0 vx xw.,a, 1 m m HF y v'b I mxv ai aN O y 'myw mx h vi x0 ro+' m ~ bu ao ~s:+'t~ Rvy..m ^W''~W 'fro v a~i x!~0 ~~.1 ieJ 0 0 .b N m-gyp/k -,t by v-,~ a m.l p y y '~A p°i pi A yyi m H~ Rl VOO y^E`r Oily 'U•~ 5IZ08 00tl210100 1000MM, now XvA'00 LSNM Us.l ~i}_J~ ri ^ isn81 v NNHB NOS2a. tl3AN3G "O'J ONIN5119tIfL 4E~f110Q15 O :a iSi~Q~Y✓,"'~. T ' t o ~ - e 3 4ndaQ x: • >a; n p U; W O: ' a 1 U : o WJi ; 0): Oi t6 i Ili: •o 8i l+: Ni m ro: m: 0j 0 ~ , cGi r 3G! F ' roi di G O; n i W N: m A J1; •G; O P y: U: A w m! Et U, A F a y b: 0: O i O i y w m i O nu w a o > Y :r x: ro: ^O 1•,1 o IQ~ v E U y O . i z a; a c ti m ro •C H m 0 - i -izb uoclag g~-...--------•ON MI?3 ®r O i ; ry ......aced ooq c'i! aooaa I P . P v. 44 l t' Kaoja,o------------------------------ Is Oat ;;o 6ui uc pzoaaz JO; { pajc; seen gUawi gsui siq} pq3 Apjaza Ggazaq I Ji o uno ssj L `0(ivuorI00 a0 a,LVJS a0 aSR aH,L 7I03 Y U aassnxs Dazsna axs dT. OIL 4 w 'QOIEZOdZOa e m a w k 0 m C a A ozi d 3 pi s S SIlul do (MG ~ m m a y r aQ N Z ~ J a c o :M N 'O a ^ U 121 U o V^'F y{ d z ro ~ v 0 a o m m a P4 W COUNTY OF JEFFERSON W. STATE OF ."OLORA00 a. o ~ a . T+ o -a'i'd oG xRioro mvF v ~•o •d •dKa~aymv~>, 'r~.d G'a v.~•d;%d m oH%H.,w a 1 j C . H H H m mo b9 °ro p.-a.mNy i0y a'a cloRmo'a y d G w° q °o•ao 1WC°m lt~ FILED IV r'FFICEOH m H1Ir- G_ d Az y Q wowuG' a... o- v°ayw ~ mq sAm40 11 v-, H 0 Nadm° ° Fwmaa°Gm a d .N a>° W p E y m R ro %R a .1I R E .C y 0 W W a a H F d V' g % 3 UON„A gg'' tf p 7 fR }'a' % O % t.4 CO %N ^y Y'd mv%iYU% 'OY Si HTJ •.UmYa °G4y G 04 y1~ •'o H ~'J '.t ° mU u m °•C cWi`n.C%"'I c.v 'O my ay,oa>..j H m^..m m.C"K m ..G. vtl •Cm y I.q a R oa o m .H„ti ov o:a w Rw W q ~ W 01 o k y Fro X ro a X* v m X %dw,aaR PI .O O w mRa+i' %600W jV mROayY w°Y... a C C YwR> v o Ya Wa 2465 266 ~1 N A Cw ~~yG° % y w ad o aOwA aw b. 0Am q. y:o a YB a dw.n ymm ~ a .e BA od y WY 11 d 1 D k m r; ++a w mo W W Oa wH a ro oC E !ti R vR GL aCa. W m EEi~DS{r !F:. u ,jMy m 5q. v~:: ~.U R -'O A o'n.aro q C °aa+ mK G' u.G W+'aaY .'..'om2f UY moy a k VflTf HER &t [CORC ft p Y N 7_K-C- a Z. m q mm Yb •d moa vy dw•°am06 a N'% a to k.-m roG. T.^..CY o R > m%N... y R>•m a roF d yP' 0... R vo'•~ 0A.. Y m P O Y _:r O w D o A N -Y-i °X ro:Gµ'VG°b Fitl rv. o'Pb Gd`.H Aoy 00 >o2° C: d H i. ' i\r n a m m %Y;d G y a A g H G.m ro o'<I y vti 21 R rob o%~ W o m y4 o m. ..I,O i~:R1 b > yl ..O %W SI• o o... m W AY .C Y.,, .F % m fi^ C % %.Y o o b W •O v O w C G ,..a._. w'"6ro G,w av W omd .a. W'Y mp g2 oro. a YR%N K aH•`r"I %H O :b w" a.G .o m s H rW U w W. ,O _ % m N .'..y o}1w'k 0 GCL G " y FY m CJ ° y B A F Q w m d m W' q w o of o m bo m~ •m.n Yaa~OH.-rd %m^Y y mHYF dObl1~"~ ma 0 B 1 i~ it ,y m m o a.d y m.^y,~ ro > b.,.R A E o m a u % w % y m K 6n y., Rao.-.N Wti ovp otigmm°wmG•O HCKia ro ,k H.Em owddm b 1 fa":p m ~Cy,1a N m 0Y 3 CWK W mmwSa, H° v 1 lSD :N n a ? m %,C o O m m aR G.o AW.•• d a ^G C d G o "'g-- H oG °1 aR aRma a mH 0 b aFmF H R 1 •rY i' Y N H by m m bCdim a U%.- AG++ A. Kf9a a.E y~ya~C m o.;j O a 1 CT OU I Pi % C it 's. % G a+s m owCW Ymd 0yo-Www-%vm 0%1 R..°. `W G ° YR rox AV Y N 1 G C a W- a> a R v b % a a H o R W B LL+' Fr P'w ro.,, p fLO m ~Ra a•^°R a ba.~WW RoOR % Ed W ~aF'^.~ +g'... U •tl O o ,d l w O a 0 ooa ~a msa'R'R b tn... d ^o wY%W a 'O^Wma~oma. ao aia P, m pp %cC 1Wtlp Ky G H "a w m N. U N G C m a d.-. " m G u A k a k A m G v Y% o m a m p~ [j ro ai C w a m a -+y ',7 o 7 m d G mo HR.G'^ W d'"•d O G... y W 0 0 G R W > \ ..-r 11 O H Y > , W RHO m 0 w'G.. k o a o u y-'o.Ci y Y Y b a1 q :G ^ ro y ^F CWm•Cm""b o ud~ Yro 'Ra vui'mw^Kta pa~~m m H•O O~aR°a Prod %do H GAdy >1 O d ti + %F .G. o M."10 W ^ O U.,. W oR W U ~ W N a d.0M robs yFFo Aa p Ra F °C u roil A a P'.°~„ m my R G p A H Y p o s%i H•d Y.O paR+m K D oo m HGad, F 'W ° 1+;1 ro 0 Y H N C G' +':(7 odA WP4a ^a YG , m :dp R,dro m d W co W A In N ~U4 Y b, H O O yY Ev m%.-C a a Yom %m FU U A Ea,,dvc.'CH.C'OK pYT160 d 'V CL %..C.°H W" 7 N o a m H a 6p v yg W ..".Camp o'II w dWHY %d%Y' m'^FOG'^ d A. Ym,c oRy O ^Fp`d d w C>ho.•, v r' O a R m O R e< 0.-1 O W -O 60v9 HYR v o U AC 0 ro m m N % 'b O a s a A .C F a+ w G G .E Gym AK mG ^ d a H a 21b G ama.^X a...roroaHF W .-1 Y S - ' o O U U v v w,m Yv ^ V % ro % a ro m d C W K o - Y V C R b A-- w M a Aw m a d d o Y a .P' F a Y y U O W O' U P. W c V u a rv z q p F H p v o k a P. A oGi c°~ m y m" R w Y Y H 0 o mad o.^ a Y k' m a o'C HY ama W v m E o 11 F a C.^ o R b a Ln a g a W O 7 o.^ o Ra °p ; k a k A a VV % B d U H Y 0 AR pypr DO VI UVF '~N VIq WW dO% d aN °R.q W- O a .O a w U as a % O' d-R d B W O W !n o w - R H N J+"Y ,w^ W. W HW''w H ^-1 ,o H G Pax m"H W w," a u N W W R v m,~vib a o H 0. X maYO RH>'a Y W W C 41aa mHH o O O o F ° W .C 'al N ti pC~o %vmAG mw ul Y .C O yH [y F %u°c~ C9 avYk a m H >,%md y A 1C' .0 v m w FP,o wa F1 d'^y W a a o Aa W % am R wm F C Zi d m kR W o d Y A ~•om ° d P A R •--1 U- U P+ W x'.w . v c/} a Pa ,0 11 ^ P W q B O a W H a v YI G> P. p, mRm a Ya .C .ryE Y m N oroA'y^o,.G W o A 6o a;oEro 6a R vH m R d U. q O w d ° ki d o a~ Z t+ d u... yAY m... v B m•ao f% p a w K p, u 0 0..' Oy., U o a ° fP m IRiW ti C'ho-• 'O d0 fn m m mG•Om NyaRromR WwRK mcny"" W ro^ro G .a 3^ o%WY O .NO Ra W., w' m _N F.Y. NU NF HC oW mo o•dm y bob v1,d WNa W W. O. C m d es m.. AW x 11 w w Y E O~ m w p cu u 'Ci-+ A, voo a% .1 a P B W W v u mo N'^ mm m~xG om wd'y' a a•ti U W G O yd, .Fpi O HS o' f11 .T a R a o o 14 (n q N EUJ ( J ^ Y a a oo?m Wq+ r1R69 mAO°aR °za,,o° a% O G G aOmM }-1 "F W o R v Y H U O O A W^ W w 11 r1 ti A Y A Y N .°Qa RwF.... A.L"^ fa+•tipoQa .Uy as O'-•4+•mmYr[%m d N Y Ya w 11 0 %a.iG Fi .C. d. Y p°W..°kWW aHbb ii F. O•> y a m 3 q <q G d w m w° 6 N o m q m a .,av ad'~am Gma NB moa%w ro%B a •o GoR s g v •O R Wm ."aK..+G a%o off q In d •'1 G A W r o- N 0 0 0 > .-i In }a W m" Y R'^ny% m pcpik mm -0 %w. ay A. m p % W O mlym%Gm m % HmRF° •M H 1+ A F+ 0 H E -a E y p °r '.a N Lq 17 r 01 E FR- w d.- m 5A H a W W W+'' O 9 H + A q O R al i. 9 P4 W (n !tl W ° N 8 U a IW N ~ F . ay m~map o, a ow AW''omd UYmroCalm v ~a;a as w A m.0 EaWia ° H .-i N al W wp W 00y.•.% 0.~ % B y m •C W•O. ,g may 00 C o W W W' ~aH~....C R P+ U •d ca q H' A, a Q... G N O ti d I W,..N r ' Pr G r: ° 3+ N z a a aR.-. ° a W'. s. mA% a 6om aw °a'Gd"' cl %O mR:: oa>i'd. d 1+ i. N ."m O C m A N U O a % CO p N F ha yl in W w,o d a U F H^~ 1 N h O F4 F r-ot' o'II...0 .C'G FYCH Cm Gy•Wm aYw 9Yd m o Y R v H {.i R % O > w d w ya '~Ap% C O 0 H a a OY Y4Ca y'O OO V % OH %fl~'d W Wyd y Y•1y P a VI U/ U PL % 1+ Ow % %i>•^ Y H m _ a p .C a a 'U 'O N° W A > G' ro % R F U V V G m H% R O G}! d A% o o a W W O P w EF] H oC`r"•°YCO K%v N.. U°WGp HT1 d RK aY aY ,❑Y Y.^oGx boa Y P N w ro Y W ed o m k'^ d ro m by a %F^. a O a 0 N C a% w w - O P +1 O ro 3 O •.a .,7 H ° 6 O v .C W:'" m y p; ^ m B G a°, o pW W'^ d d Y R d K" d. 4 b O a b 71 W 11 (a - .H ko m H O > a H N 'C F k' m-V K W a o... '.o W [y W R Aw vaY oaaw%%g y 'CVm 'D O•ao ..P...HRm%rop ~aA. Y. FC 60GRAw R.Yo adv W Y •.a z 2 .-1 •d -a W .--I 1-1 ,A A is%aa ~ W % o v W d^ m ti d es W 6A g N R R d .C m WoF amUZ 3 a O W C 0 q h.d q p ~ W R a 3x W Z CR.-.Y am > Gv ma aarovfLd 60 •Oa YA, pR F'a 1-1 O N O 5 fC q W O W r7 °F, it m a° O% a H- a g o a Y M R R'^ Y a Y B m a 0. .K P. m ^-1 > d vl .e v1 .q H Cd p W O 11 a 7 p m a p mF m. d.. d m G m „ d a d d.-.. m o" % o R d o Z O W J7 F r°. oN'"awo °.t RAH a z%.Fa°mm~p M.yWs; •°d Fpw a mwaom p°H% R. 'k Odw w"1++' O W c; 1:4 OP+ O m hi ai % o a 7. a w G o R GL.•. C a ai m k W Q m U O/ d W z l q Y pTJ Om H a.^R % w KC,0 H CWi C R m W o d o W m F rl: a Q U al P F W •n.W Y „ ORR 1,y a.C ^ v Y % d En -Ar O °r W G W R y5 •.a z C C Wti~G m dLL 'a"i Y.a YY HHG .Ca - a %p%% a Per .O 'O A p W m tYi a G P4 E Nm dmd K q Y w W a m 3 K a o a E.I . G d N a m es„ a w W~~ y Ft, p 7. v a Q w a E o ^•qro Hti HY ~m w--.GOm RdR,., ~.nN mR'p 0 O`WR y Y •c.c'a%o m 'd C•1 O W h W 104 O w d) N W d W Y q Q p 11 1-1 W r]0 O A O Y m a O Y Qt W a d'F N % a ro W Y Q' a m w% a%° U U%° W dA % W^ a s ro w m w.^ z a a U w a % 'ro G Y H n w d m... o . 41 m G-rN.: 1-1 q ~ y b➢w"md d~•O wU o 'er ,a °IVy.COm aW•O^..C AN% a,n G %~dd o E % d a v o a... RY d u a W W B p" m z W a rop GAGo Q G R H F m W9 rs7 •rl O K ~'u -W W ..a 11 k mKOOgFmm.•G• K+'>mYd G%W 0P+. "BaR OO bo a) W..y.,r W o d •d % G K.t; a C% E epY ;G^ ' v d 3 Y w d o 6oF`• R O w o lyd -Ct rG G1;C 'V~`'.' a1. .U U W>va °H ..%o"-' Y R a o wm... aYK m ro 0 % :C % m o w w > m .o Y A'^ A A C C o H V ~y mw k o v" E7+ 'O ro w .'P' fY' ^a a0 p m oy..i Fa o w o-do ro ma..F rota.: d ro.^ m H Vl o O Y•° br" G Y 1: R a W N O R i. O GC o a s o a G mR:.aBK W aR V. mda WG Rd A d %p,oaA II.y-I A GF W a W C az x .".4 d F a.•.a mA arom G H aop, %W~+a daY> H H %%%d vp,d k a u y F y lO a '-.iYJ Y P•1 Pi d F ° F a% W H y'O Y ~Ca+ H O d Y d 'V >'D d U i' F G a a u- O O Y ro 0 'f. a s •C.b a m p LL~' m 'O k~ U % R fS O m {1 % m O a {LY UF.C ama Li Cl '21 1n a A Bbad R%dYw %+R'Y %YdOAO AR0 W Y YY•O m%i'~-~YY o 9 0 U A s N a Pr F p F W 0 w w Q c z ay^ N H og++0 y VY "HOS ,Y 6p V bD y d k NYro m RX w N C V ttl Mrs- ypC~ y ° I m O ° ?:c 0 H m y ~d o • ro N m aY kJ o~0 wy NK m m.4 F mm 6pm V ~ H N o V.- 0 m O 0 m m H ^0 mw mm Y J N o i.+ O w o o m ~ya 0 Y ry m-oU m Y'N k 54 a ro m y YA v H yyw kO w~kkr-' m m •~wm& Y'O m M 00 °u m Y Z, F H m m rmrom3 A q m " m A N N Y V 00V Hti kR ro Ya'd0.~ ~ •C oi'O U m Y.r ^.J Y ~ 01 NF. ..~~om .GX aAm., ro-0P' N'mp y>a'm Fm .c m.^~oo O, .C-aq u om A m H m F YY ro m k k m ly H m.nA ~ ~1 •"7- ro pF Y t3 ~y m w M,. N Ymi] YWC YWmY CIONmm {ZmN°kp,aw w P,° 0 C M F C o V ° m w"'C O id b W V mYA O V V H V'O o y ,a W W w N W ro q ku'ti cV, V f. ° vi 'd 0 C m ro w k Y Pi H m Ri ° Y V't°. F w .A.. q0 OAcm. IWW Fpyo mY~~•dR ro°~.G YV~.OGPo H °k Uti Nngo NY(d NCN roH om° yY taNm 7s NYm V~p,P 0-r N0 C 0VY OO;k.Mro o•O FO 0, WH rom C'00"Ip HY Y~.Cro og bN k 0~0 ~H~Y TJ oo P,o roN>....do ° o .R-.V VFC '00.m Nyw 3p°y VVO kway^o aHiAkA by NA.C Paimro Y >V OY dGb AF:A VWy YH OYO F°Im FLL°A NyW -V °m ~mr :.6 Y O'M _ IO `O Y R IN N A yPo yom °VA k'jy ~Om AAVA aowyb Y4 ro O 0 0 .tir ^ R" m ttl A ro ro "'o 0 ~'4'^• F H .OII 0 0 Y C4 H m H d b T: m Y m'Hm °'•Cw Oo N °1Vro c°i'n y''w°o wvV FLH- WaN+.o cVi Rm '~H mWP g eti <'6I ON ❑~j'.Y.m °VH°N °OY HAY Ow O m td 0 m C m C N O iJ O k O YW m F O a O ro Ns' y d y X00 0 FL H U 0 w N NF.mro oC 0 O. aS:Y roo'F°m oy q'N am BOO-03.VV f m OQ Y...O. pRa V.H. ° m 7 Neiv Omro m-m° a' y HHmp'C.d V Hm mo ° A Hmm m.-.Nao ,mo o'oY•tl };gym q om OuNmwm ouH m~v Xro ap G,q vVai .mC m cH°iA o Nw K~CC•INN V • 0 x.k,A P, ?69 Yyy~jJ+ ~Hm wm„Y N .NH ah O mN m kba Fyo~ V A" HAV Yli2 ° OYW mHma...N.p fL .YS'+n ro ti o^ym 'H p Q,0 f. u.~ ym oawN AbOw ONO V ° V Pyo FY aHi K F FL 0P'm•°O m S, g0w As. off ,O Hbu~„ iSp 00 Vk•G 'H Ala ak+' au u off' 'd °m ro O N kw V.V.,A •o 00 ''0.0 aHN aH GL Cu ?mg k54 viA Pa 0 wti `.:~N PO>. roY V Para C o' ma s°+H0 V F•jV k. Vm 6 ~ 4A - ov.C •D O~i+RN Um•kO O1 'Ow mCm mW Y.N•N d~0 Uii SI'v 0kV o.M .0 0"V1 ym~ Hm C'.°C mY'A aCimw' R.ja cmim LPN NU~NmN yy wa°.a-AV HCNqqq Zmro f•i 0y k°N 6•'y7C dp A'OY Oro k ro f~°:d NYw NAVCYOOI.O oo I`l o•OkoO 0mo mmd rCjH YN smi Oy'~'U•mk PV b k ~ UroR m Y i ti 0 0 m R E+ V b W Y a m A'~ A 000 yf+0 W kom a 0000 0°0o'y Ngyy m 8Pa vm w oy k °0. ]awwH Ay w o w o'Hia~o H°m 4'w o w y~Yro V•LJ- m•k^C m P•A o m 40dNHy'i-, oNY yyk ~y ~0N0 (y"~O-.~.-~ OC4A.Y-imYrCNk my Y Ym'a °y HAY k.~m - oyo W•riHP, P.owmVm E C om a'ti 0 ~P m ^OCmi C0 mYw Q ro N oPaP~mV vm b.C w.". ~yk. X Pa G ro 0R FLNO om" y'7 m mwo ylm Np °m Nmm o >,.^.Y..HiOYm°HO NN oA 0° ,Zw H.d 0A0 'tiA G°~ YTJ'v Ymmwo root/ oro wb oa oy ywo'Ammw Ao 7 qN V Y'yH^,~ V a°i •C W v NV. •m y w -.k. ami m o m F4 k FI n tV. V C PI V N +a W u A ON V..A.+A kV N:iC ❑O A'V k' W'tf °k' Vy.m YAH V H H• a o u; A y m.m O^ o ro N m o •d o y fL mUYO+o'm d Tm .ao W. gym WA0 0ti P'.noro w mm dm O7a HpY A~'° N NY n'm b r~N ~ w,ba=o X13 y N 60m ° °w qg~~ Y my im+msl o 0R'a C..)' ° H N V Igo FmYm m W °m -roHm0U g R.mmm m o,V k~❑ H ;G HmAW PR aHm CH ta.°0rolioC Nw~--JA R.f'. msmi'b z°p,V q 0,4m 040-5 a° bn mma:m 0g 9r" o00 wy CVOo 0o roAP,°m °ur sPam Y.- 0 0 A y m °i H--: m m CY m U m R ro•b m,m,-:: w m y F U F ro th W °.0. 0-9:;5A m vi H Pa,o No >CoY a'o .n 00 mvw oo Tmo 6p'm mO W~Wz q^N dN P" 0w o u 0 N U Pa N '.C 0 0 C .C 7 I y o E o f P m° X m Y m A A P H k W8 mAY W HHY ^•J"'a O m U „Y C,y byNV Hm ycaov.o s+... Z+ oa m. ~1 -V H Y O N m U'y^ O C Y O .{J .G ypo.~ami Nwq uuw C°Hmo?.ma~aW waw g ^J V m w Tl."-i m o° C C H ° V• w' Y O N'O ° O'O k Y Y O° N m k 7A k'^ 0 C 0 V V m 0 k p U w.^" k H ro.- ro H m m H Z H. wA mNY mg N. A.Oa mC. 0.....am ONONO welt/ Ak P W 0 AV 0 v LTL08 0*0100 9anu2(3 CM X08 `0 'd Kueddwro0 Iamloo,94i Y y Y Y ~ ~ ~ gN ro'O H N ro O ~ H F ~v ~ d J~ y i N`y i w a m A N ~7 7 a ° a ti R y u : pH ~ om R p,N a V 7 H 'M , Y~ Q m °m ] O ` 44 ro I A ~ m m~~ Y y ~ Y I _ OA '^W k m R P: 001 y.a o o L F •D a N m HY o U 11: b N UyUH y IC: FFF~~~ 14 wo m Amo Y w 0: A.n w"'oRU m ~ 0. V N m a k PF "AYH H `"I°IS m~ w 6 UI mH ❑ A w pa N Pao G N N k.o m o: k'ow I m^ ^ v m 'O: a°imw 1 ro NYN d W H m • I N w m A .a 0: ° m0 1 m V °A m RI U, 'A'AA I W R W mob iEA4Law m 0 I V g m ro a m W mR V 1 ~a+uw +m., RAy I am V V ro 0 ro N p Y Rro N .o 0 0o olMoV U N H a N VOJ d H~ N a•O N m a w %mV a) 41omN,fl N A o v 1 m yNj Y o a,; o p d I R o> V m m b l v ^f A .C , E A 0 I A,r, v cmi C m Hb W Ny~~ QI~ ❑ N N O ~ „ A opq iaHm ~g0l;0.'a +P oamA N- 0 (x] U.OY om,y Vm P . oy m~ 0 HA. ro 0 0 0d Ad om ro my y~m NN e' umi "a U W OW 5Y: C ow N ~ m xi a H -1~1; e+;(tip; 0, -4 kl~ R~ b6 0 0 g ° ova F..._E i1F^. L? 601 F'r lie ~n aanxsa oxixsnena aaomvue` n $ 6g ON U014da3va. OR ME - aaen slooq uq papaooaa 6jnp st pun --6T • '.14--..... 11111R 'I }e eaUs Am IT paoaaa zo; pall; ssek 4uauui.x3sm scg3 gegg G,Tpaao 6gaaaq I 'SS'~Y l '.y L` %c oavxo110D Ho all m v. . my; o a4 o: R ~ ro. A i ro; 41 N' 7 4: H a CR:Oj O 11'•: Q•: 0 F A 74: a: pi Ui U ' ~ q Nt C: y i i N: C1 0 ' vE ro; ' h0 Ck ro: k o j O cau a m p 14. a F C '-i; cctl :k 'F 0 0 jJ± 30 Esn aas 2Io3 ~~ssnas ~a~sria ~gz _ 01 o 'U01 ua0da0a' n--------- I H . w ro ' o 1 TTs11W ((~~u~TTT 1~77 ~3 1asr~7 ® Q~~ ~q 11 LL ~y Fv N . - t~ a Case No.: App: Last Name: App: First Name: Owner: Last Name: Owner: First Name: App Address: City, State Zip: App: Phone: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Owner Phone: Project Address: Street Name: City/State, Zip: Case Disposition: Project Planner: File Location: Notes: Follow-Up: UP0404 Quarter Section Map No ,,,pplewood Baptist Church'.. Related Cases: Po Duffy Deardorff Case History: pplewood Baptist 11200 W. 32nd Ave. ! Review Body: heat Ridge, CO 80033 03-232-9575 APN: ame 2nd Review Body: 2nd Review Date: game Decision-making Body: 11228 Approval/Denial Date: est32nd Avenue heat Ridge, CO80033 Reso/Ordinance No.: rN MS0401 SUP to allow an educational facility on residentially zoned property dm. 39- Condit i of Approval: