HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes WA-02-04(A)
.., ,.
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
ORIGINAL
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado on the 25th day of Julv. 2002.
CASE NO. W A-02-04(A)
APPliCANT'S NAME: Victor Olson
LOCATION: 2620 Upham
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member BLAIR, the
following resolution was stated:
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. W A-02-04(A) is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and there were no
protests registered against the application; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY NOT be granted without substantially impairing the
intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
W A-02-04(A) be, and hereby is, DENIED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 16.5 foot side yard setback variance from the required 30 foot side
yard setback when adjacent to a public street.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. In the context ofthe Wheat Ridge Codes of Law and, in recognition that a variance runs
with the property, the Board is of the opinion that, again in the context of the intent of the
code, there are no generally recognized unusual circumstances attributed to this variance
request.
2. It would seem likely that the approval of this variance would facilitate construction of a
structure, which although designed to be architecturally compatible with the primary
structure, is likely, in the opinion of the Board, to result in a negative impact to adjacent
properties related to the essential character of the neighborhood and possibly their
property values to a significant degree.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution W A-02-04(A)
Page two (2)
3. On balance, although there may be some tangible benefit to the neighborhood as a result
of enclosing the motor home, it would seem that the granting of this variance would not
result in a significant enough benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or community.
VOTE:
YEs:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABBOTT, BLAIR, DRDA, HOWARD, MONTOYA, YOUNG
None
ECHELMEYER, HOVLAND
DISPOSITION: A request for a 16.5 foot side yard setback variance from the required 30 foot
side yard setback when adjacent to a public street was DENIED.
ADOPTED and made effective this 25th day of Julv. 2002.
~~~
Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
Board of Adjustment