HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes WA-96-12CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Mary Lou Chapla, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of
Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was
duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado, on the 23rd day of Mav , 1996.
CASE NO: WA-96-12
APPLICANT'S NAME: C and E Communications
LOCATION: 10501 W. I-70 Frontage Road North
Upon motion by Board Member ABBOTT , seconded by Board Member
SANG , the following Resolution was stated.
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an Administrative
Officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application, Case No. WA-9h-12
is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an Administrative
Officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the required 15 days by law
and there WERE NO protests registered against it; and
• WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY NOT be granted without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations
governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment
Application Case No. WA-96-12 , be and hereby is DENIED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 9' height to the 32' billboard height
requirement for property zoned Planned
Industrial Development
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. Conceptually, if not literally verbatim, and in
recognition of the applicant's objections, the Board
finds itself in agreement with the interpretation of the
City staff, whose language was specifically modified in Items
6, 8, and 9, as presented and related to the criteria.
2. In recognition of the applicant's arguments related to
visual blocking and merging of the various sign images
proximal to this site were reasonable. They would not
appear to be a situation adequately unique as to vary
the intent and purpose of the ordinance.
Case No. WA-96-12/Resolution
Page 2
3. It is not the intent of the Board to in any way to punish
the applicant for the history of this application by
denying this application, or ignore possible harm to
adjacent signage but to interpret the intent and purpose
of the ordinance to the benefit of the general public.
VOTE: YES: Abbott, Echelmeyer, Hovland, Howard, Dunker, Sang and
Walker
NO: None
DISPOSITION: MOTION FOR DENIAL CARRIED 7-0. VARIANCE REQUEST
DENIED.
D D this 23rd day of May, 1996.
f
ROBERT WALR~ [t, Chairman Mary\ Liu ~hapla, Secretary
Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment