HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-16-05City of
�Wh6atkjdge
MUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building
April I. 2016
Mr. Louis Ficco
3265 Iris Court
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Re: Case No. WA -16-05
Dear Mr. Ficco:
7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
Please be advised that your request for a 650 square foot building coverage variance from the 25%
maximum for a one -family dwelling in the Residential -One (R-1) zone district resulting in a
29.5% building coverage for property located at 3230 Iris Court has been approved.
Enclosed is a copy of the Approval of Variance. Please note that all variance requests
automatically expire within 180 days (September 28, 2016) of the date it was granted unless a
building permit for the variance has been obtained within such period of time.
You are now welcome to apply for a building permit to construct the addition. Please feel free to
be in touch with any further questions.
Sincerely,
Tammy Odean
Administrative Assistant
Enclosure: Approval of Variance and Staff Report
Cc: WA -16-05 (case file)
WAI605.doc
www.d.wheatridge.co.us
7500 West 29th Avenue - City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 `� wheat 1 e
303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857
Approval of Variance
WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 3230 Iris Court
referenced as Case No. WA -16-05 / Ficco; and
WHEREAS. City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section
26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section
26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and
WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application;
NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 650 square foot building coverage variance from
the 25% maximum for a one -family dwelling in the Residential -One (R-1) zone district resulting in
a 29.5% building coverage (Case No. WA -16-05 / Ficco) is granted for the property located at
3230 Iris Court, based on the following findings of fact:
1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
2. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property that may not be possible
without the variance.
3. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare.
4. There appear to be circumstances and conditions present in the neighborhood, not unique to
this property, necessitating the variance request.
5. No objections were received regarding the variance request during the public notification
period.
With the following conditions:
1. The addition shall be consistent with the architectural representations shown on the
submittal, or other as approved by Staff.
Date
City Of
Wh6atRjdge
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Community Development Director DATE: March 28, 2016
CASE MANAGER: Zack Wallace
CASE NO. & NAME: WA -16-05 / Ficco
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 650 square foot building coverage variance from the 25%
maximum for a one -family dwelling in the Residential -One (R-1) zone district
resulting in a 29.5% building coverage, an 18% deviation.
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3230 his Court
APPLICANT (S):
OWNER (S):
APPROXIMATE AREA:
PRESENT ZONING:
PRESENT LAND USE:
Louis Ficco
Louis Ficco
14,520 square feet (0.33 acres)
Residential -One (R-1)
Vacant Lot
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
Location Map
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -16-05 /Ficco
Site
JURISDICTION•
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make an
administrative decision.
I. REQUEST
The property measures 14,520 square feet and is located in the Residential -One (R-1) zone district.
The R-1 zone district allows a maximum building coverage of 25% which, for this particular lot,
translates to 3,630 buildable square feet. The applicant is requesting a 650 square foot (18%) variance
from the maximum building coverage in order to construct a custom home covering 4,280 square feet.
This will result in a building coverage of 29.5%.
Section 26-115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of
Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative variances from the strict
application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of
the standard.
II. CASE ANALYSIS
The variance is being requested so the property owner may construct a custom home covering 4,280
square feet (29.5%) of the 14,520 square foot lot. The property is zoned R-1, which allows for a
maximum building coverage of 25%. The property is located on Iris Court north of 32"d Avenue
(Exhibit 1, Aerial). It sits in a heavily residential area of the City, completely surrounded by the R-1
zone district (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). For locational reference, this property is approximately 500 feet
west of Wheat Ridge High School, approximately 500 feet north of Crown Hill Park, and
approximately 1,000 feet east of Kipling Street. The subject property was platted in 2001 as part of the
Applewood Preserve Subdivision — Filing No. 2. Previously, a two-story wood and brick dwelling unit
was located on the site. A demolition permit for the structure was issued in 2005, and the property has
been vacant since.
This request is not uncommon for this residential subdivision. There are a total of twelve lots in
Applewood Preserve, with individual parcels being developed between 2003 and 2015. Three homes
were approved for building coverage variances between 2004 and 2005, with another approved in 2015
(Exhibit 3, Building Coverage variances). The applicant for the requested variance, Lou Ficco, was
also the applicant for the four other variances requested.
The proposed home will comply with all other Residential -One (R-1) development standards including
minimum setbacks (Exhibit 4, Site Plan).
R-1 Development Standards:
Required
Actual
Lot Area
12,500 square feet (min)
14,520 square feet
Lot Width
100 feet min
133 feet
Lot Coverage
25% max
29.5%
Front Setback
20 feet (min)
—33 feet
Side Setback
15 feet (min)
—17 feet (north)
—26 feet (south)
Rear Setback
15 feet min
—16 feet
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -16-05 /Ficco
During the public notification period neither inquiries nor objections were received regarding this
variance request.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
In order to approve an administrative variance, the Community Development Director must determine
that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been
met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance
criteria (Exhibit 6, Criteria Response). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the
variance criteria.
1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located.
If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. A
smaller home could be constructed on the site, or the applicant could utilize the 35 -foot
maximum height allowed in all residential zone districts in Wheat Ridge to add a second floor
to the home without adding to the building coverage. The property will continue to have
development potential, regardless of the outcome of the variance request.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
A variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. Four homes in the subdivision have
been approved for building coverages variances, one as recently as April 2015. Allowing the
variance to the building coverage would allow the applicant to build a custom home of similar
size and design to the other homes in the neighborhood.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application,
which would not be possible without the variance.
The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property, which would not be
possible without the variance. In order to construct a home that is in line with the other homes
in the subdivision, it must be of a certain size and architectural quality. While the applicant
could build a smaller home, a larger investment in the property is necessary to fit the character
of the surrounding area.
Staff finds this criterion has been met
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific
property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried
out.
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -16-05 /Ficco
While there is 10 feet of fall across the property, this is not a contributing factor in the variance
request. There are no other shape or topographical conditions impacting the site.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property.
The hardship has been created by the interested party's desire for a home that exceeds the
building coverage maximum for the R-1 zone district.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other property, or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located,
by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or
development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing
the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or
impairing property values within the neighborhood.
The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to
neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the
adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result
of this request.
The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it cause an obstruction
to motorists on the adjacent streets.
It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood.
Staff finds this criterion has been rnet.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in
the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
Four other homes in the subdivision have been granted building coverage variances. This
suggests that are circumstances and conditions present in the neighborhood not unique to this
property.
Staff finds that this criterion has been met.
8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with
disabilities.
Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes
pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities.
Staff finds this criterion is not applicable.
Administrative Variance 4
Case No. WA -16-0S / Ficco
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the
Architectural and Site Design Manual
The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling
units.
Staff finds this criterion is not applicable.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends
APPROVAL of a 650 square foot (18%) variance from the 25% - 3,630 square feet of allowable
building coverage, resulting in a building coverage of 29.5%. Staff has found that there are unique
circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff
recommends approval for the following reasons:
1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
2. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property that may not be possible
without the variance.
3. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare.
4. There appear to be circumstances and conditions present in the neighborhood, not unique to
this property necessitating this variance request.
5. No objections were received regarding the variance request during the public notification
period.
With the following conditions:
1. The home shall be consistent with the architectural representations shown on the submittal, or
other as approved by staff.
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -16-05 /Ficco
EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -16-05 /Ficco
EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP
W heat Ridge
Geographic
Information Systems
Leaend
Subject Property
Wheat Ridge City Limit
Displayed Zone Districts
Residential -One (R-1)
0
Z t
V ;�µ
� o
32ND AV
nrnr..auo.rur. r........................C.rruro�nouurr�..�.arr■
Sim Pwb coo.a W. P o„cnon N
Ca1w�7o Central Zw
Deism. NAD83
e.a.e�ra
Administrative Variance 7
Case No. WA -16-051 Ficco
EXHIBIT 3: BUILDING COVERAGE
VARIANCES
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -16-05 /Ficco
EXHIBIT 4: SITE PLAN
r-1�-•-
•
(
N OD' II' 44' W 13?96' PROPERTY LINE
--•-•--•-•--•--•-•-�-•-�
LINE OF ID' UTILITY EASEMENT
•
W—LME
OF IS' SETDACK
.6
f
f a
'
JL
f
f
I�
I
f
�f'
A
f�
o,
in
Ln
k
•
,
z.I
00 00
• I
L - - - - -- ---- --- - - --
' I
LME OF 30' FRONT SETBACK
I
II
�
• I
•
ILME
OF ID' UTILITY EASEMENT
—
—
L.
— • — • — . — . — . • T, • — •
N OD' 11' 44' W � X
•
PROPERTY LME
IRIS COURT
GARAGE AREA 986 SQ. FT.
ENTRY PORCH 130 SQ.FT,
LIVING PORCH 114 SQ, FT
COVERED REAR PATIO 218 SQ, FT.
HOUSE MAIN LEVEL 2-172 SQ FT
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4280 SQ. FT.
TOTAL LOT AREA 14520 SQ, FT.
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4280 SQ. FT.
(including porches and rear covered patio)
LOT COVERAGE - 29.5 i,
Administrative Variance 9
Case No. 1,VA-16-05 /Ficco
EXHIBIT 5: SITE PHOTOS
ki.a
Administrative Variance 10
Case No. WA -16-05 / Ficco
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-16-05 /Ficco
EXHIBIT 6: CRITERIA RESPONSE
i o whom it may t.oncern:
This letter is in response to the Review Criteria in applying for a variance. The
variance that we are asking for is an increase in lot coverage from 25% to 29.5% for
3230 Iris Ct.. The Applewood Preserve Subdivision is one of the premier
subdivisions in the City of Wheat Ridge. It consists of 12 custom home sites (10 of
which are completed) that are valued in the million -dollar range. 3230 Iris Ct. is the
third lot down from the corner of 32nd on the east side of Iris. This lot is under
contract contingent on the approval of the future owners plans. Before summiting
the plans for plan review for a building permit we are asking for a variance of 4.5%
in lot coverage because the current plan is over maximum lot coverage. The future
homeowners are a proposing to build a single story residence. We have been
working with the architect on refining the plan to cut as much space a possible and
still maintain a residence that is suitable for their needs as well as remaining
suitable for the subdivision. The Lot is 14520 square feet which will hold a much
larger residence if the residence was to go to a two story dwelling. Part of the
reason that the residence is over the maximum is due to the covered patios and
entry way as well as the three car garage. The livable space of the home is 2772
square feet. The purposed residence will still remain within all setbacks.
The following responses are to answer the questions outlined in the Review Criteria.
1. The property will not meet the needs of the future homebuyer to remain a
single story dwelling under the current 25% maximum coverage. They are
elderly and do not want a house on more than one level. They have made
sacrifices in their design to try and accommodate the 25% coverage but
cannot get there without going to a multiple story residence.
2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Granting
the variance will enhance the character and the covered entry porch and
covered patios will not only make the house more functional but also adds to
the design characteristics of the residence, by giving it a more defined look
that a home in this price range requires.
3. We along with the future homeowner have invested a great deal of time as
well as money into the design of proposed residence for this lot. The ranch
style house will be a great asset to the subdivision.
4. Due to the fact that the house faces west and there is a patio on the front of
the house that has mountain views it will be unbearable hot in the summer
with no shelter over the patio.
5. There has been no created hardship; however there have been similar
requests within the same subdivision, along with other subdivisions in the
area for ranch style houses. It is next to impossible to get a decent size ranch
home to fit on the lots with the maximum lot coverage of 25%. For a house
to fit into the price range of this unique subdivision it is imperative that the
home is constructed with the amenities of a home in that range, such as a
three car garage, covered patios and a grand entry. It also needs to be able to
maintain the room sizes of a house in this category.
6. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public, the
neighborhood or the adjacent properties. The variance would give the lot the
ability to stay as a ranch style home, which will enhance the supply of light
and air to the adjacent properties. Granting of the variance will in no way
affect the setbacks.
7. The unusual circumstances necessitating the variance are present in the
neighborhood and there are other lots in the same subdivision that have
needed the same type of variance.
Thank you for your consideration, please contact me with any questions.
Lou Ficco
303-263-0489
louficco@gmail.com
Administrative Variance 12
Case No. WA -16-05 /Ficco
EXHIBIT 6: ELEVATIONS
L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J
HEST ELEVATION
I
I
I
1
I
n SOUTH ELEVATION
U U T Z 71
-------- IMP
I
I I
I I
i
Cl EAST ELEVATION
NONTH ELEVATION
Administrative Variance 13
Case No. WA -16-05 / Ficco
POSTING CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. WA -16-05
DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS: March 21, 2016
(name)
residing at���-
(address)
as the applicant for Case No. WA -16-05
Public Notice at
W hk-at
hereby certify that I have posted the sign for
3230 Iris Court
(location)
on this oks day of w- and do hereby certify that said sign has been
posted and remained in place for ten (10) days prior to and including the deadline for written
comments regarding this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below.
Signa e:
NOTE: This form must be submitted to the ommunity D elopment Department for this case
and will be placed in the applicant's case file.
MAP
♦ AI
/of
Wheat Ilclgc
PUBLIC POSTING REQUIREMENTS
One sign must be posted per street frontage. In addition, the following requirements
must be met:
The sign must be located within the property boundaries.
■ The sign must be securely mounted on a flat surface.
■ The sign must be elevated a minimum of thirty (30) inches from ground.
• The sign must be visible from the street without obstruction.
■ The sign must be legible and posted for ten (10) continuous days prior to and
including the deadline for written comments [sign must be in place until 5pm on
March 21, 2016]
It is the applicant's responsibility to certify that these requirements have been met and
to submit a completed Posting Certification Form to the Community Development
Department.
City of
W heat dge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge. CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
LETTER NOTICE
March 10, 2016
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA -16-05, a request for a lot coverage variance
to the maximum resulting in a 29.5% coverage for property zoned Residential -I
(R-1) located at 3230 Iris Court. The attached aerial photo identifies the location
of the variance request.
The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which
allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning
Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a
decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request
by certified mail.
If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or
if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in
writing by 5:00 p.m. on March 21, 2016.
Thank you.
W A 1605.doc
www.6wheatridge.co.us
Site Plan
A request for a lot coverage variance to the maximum resulting in a 29.5%
coverage for property zoned Residential -One (R-1) located at 3230 Iris Court.
`k
U3260 .•
v40
N
easy Peep- L.aoeis A Bend along line to i
Use Avery® Template 516019 j Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edgeym j
FICCO LOUIS J LARSON NANCY L
3650 VANCE #1 3240 IRIS
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
ROBERT C PRALL QPRT TRUST WICKERSHAM WILLIAM E JR
MARY M PRALL QPRT TRUST WICKERSHAM CLEOTILDE M
3225 IRIS WILSON
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3295 INDEPENDENCE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
CURRENT RESIDENT
3235 IRIS CT
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
a AVERY® 51600
IL
MORRIS WALTER L MORRIS ROSE A
3285 INDEPENDENCE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
WRIGHT TOM WRIGHT SUSAN
9625 W 32ND
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
ttiquettes faciles a peler ; A Repliez a la hachure afin de ,
® ® , Sens de i www.avery.com
Utilisez le gabarit AVERY 5160 chargement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-up"K 1 1 -800 -GO -AVERY
1
NV]d AOOH
OP 'AJAnOP NOoH3AA3f 'an O ZAH3*Hd aOOAL 31ddV Of IM
CCOOQ OP '30011111UNIA JZ[flop 01H' OEZE cv,
WIVEIMIN VIVIN aNY wma uod arjOH R0.14911i) v UJ,
I T% -tc
U I I jj� I I I 111, 1111:
Fig
n.
..........
-------- - --------- - ----
CA
0
01,
e
e
LL
IL
11 ILI, , fl�' 1i
i; I11 11 ii 1111 0
HNOt. VAM HOIH3lX3
OP 'AINnop N ar en ansa as soar a�aar o� tai
£6008 Op '3pp01HIV3HAk LHfiop X11211 0626
H�711V910flH VIVW ONV XDIO 2103 3rjOH WO.LSflp V
— -1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I•
I
1
I
I
-_J
z
0
F
4
Cs]
x
z
SNOI LVAR13
MOO Oa '3l3GlHjv3HAI lufloo
Hpnveiana vlvi4 aNv via Hoo amoH
HHJIXH
70—
9! 0£Z£
19flo v
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
co
Y d
W AAAlIw nvpa6j"Af a PMrIld WIP ZAHN"Hd GOO& MddV 6% Mn
cc000 op '31)aiH LY3HY lafI0p offal OEZE
Hpfivoia ?Iyiy" QHY xpia UO3 MOH RO LOnp v
IL f-� I-- LLL LL
LL LL
(� N
N
_O
Q
f.
LL
6
N
(Y } Z
W ==w—j 0-
OOp4 O
w CL (L w LL
WwA
(Y�_—>
QZ}OO p
�wJU1 �-
0
LL LL
LU LU
— N
Q~ o
fil s U
p�o-w
JJ:3U
Q4u
00S O
I
Cit
L)
3Aaa alL3W3NCOI
�osaiae.Q io aa,
I
I
31
51 xl
I
IA
13
�'
sl �i �
iR
§
•3
----------
am.,
L.L.---=.ioaa,-----I—
IL f-� I-- LLL LL
LL LL
(� N
N
_O
Q
f.
LL
6
N
(Y } Z
W ==w—j 0-
OOp4 O
w CL (L w LL
WwA
(Y�_—>
QZ}OO p
�wJU1 �-
0
LL LL
LU LU
— N
Q~ o
fil s U
p�o-w
JJ:3U
Q4u
00S O
I
Cit
L)
6. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public, the
neighborhood or the adjacent properties. The variance would give the lot the
ability to stay as a ranch style home, which will enhance the supply of light
and air to the adjacent properties. Granting of the variance will in no way
affect the setbacks.
7. The unusual circumstances necessitating the variance are present in the
neighborhood and there are other lots in the same subdivision that have
needed the same type of variance.
Thank you for your consideration, please contact me with any questions.
Lou Ficco
303-263-0489
louficco@gmaii.com
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is in response to the Review Criteria in applying for a variance. The
variance that we are asking for is an increase in lot coverage from 25% to 29.5% for
3230 Iris Ct.. The Applewood Preserve Subdivision is one of the premier
subdivisions in the City of Wheat Ridge. It consists of 12 custom home sites (10 of
which are completed) that are valued in the million -dollar range. 3230 Iris Ct. is the
third lot down from the corner of 32°d on the east side of Iris. This lot is under
contract contingent on the approval of the future owners plans. Before summiting
the plans for plan review for a building permit we are asking for a variance of 4.5%
in lot coverage because the current plan is over maximum lot coverage. The future
homeowners are a proposing to build a single story residence. We have been
working with the architect on refining the plan to cut as much space a possible and
still maintain a residence that is suitable for their needs as well as remaining
suitable for the subdivision. The Lot is 14520 square feet which will hold a much
larger residence if the residence was to go to a two story dwelling. Part of the
reason that the residence is over the maximum is due to the covered patios and
entry way as well as the three car garage. The livable space of the home is 2772
square feet. The purposed residence will still remain within all setbacks.
The following responses are to answer the questions outlined in the Review Criteria.
1. The property will not meet the needs of the future homebuyer to remain a
single story dwelling under the current 25% maximum coverage. They are
elderly and do not want a house on more than one level. They have made
sacrifices in their design to try and accommodate the 25% coverage but
cannot get there without going to a multiple story residence.
2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Granting
the variance will enhance the character and the covered entry porch and
covered patios will not only make the house more functional but also adds to
the design characteristics of the residence, by giving it a more defined look
that a home in this price range requires.
3. We along with the future homeowner have invested a great deal of time as
well as money into the design of proposed residence for this lot. The ranch
style house will be a great asset to the subdivision.
4. Due to the fact that the house faces west and there is a patio on the front of
the house that has mountain views it will be unbearable hot in the summer
with no shelter over the patio.
5. There has been no created hardship; however there have been similar
requests within the same subdivision, along with other subdivisions in the
area for ranch style houses. It is next to impossible to get a decent size ranch
home to fit on the lots with the maximum lot coverage of 25%. For a house
to fit into the price range of this unique subdivision it is imperative that the
home is constructed with the amenities of a home in that range, such as a
three car garage, covered patios and a grand entry. It also needs to be able to
maintain the room sizes of a house in this category.
SIN: 300439652
REAL PROPERTY
TAX STATEMENT
Tax Year / Payable
2015 2016
39-272-15-057 TAG: 3141
Property Address: 3230 IRIS CT
Current Owner
FICCO LOUIS J
fax Authority/Other Charges
R1 SCHOOL BOND REDEMPTION FUND
R1 SCHOOL GENERAL FUND
*CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
*COUNTY GENERAL FUND
*DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
DEVELOPMENTAL DISABLITY FUND
*LIBRARY FUND
*ROAD & BRIDGE FUND
WHEAT RIDGE
*URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD C SO PLAT
*URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD CONT DIST
WESTRIDGE SAN DIST
WHEATRIDGE FIRE DIST
Sub Total
Total
$ per thousand of
assessed va lue
Tax Mill levy
6.7500
40.7370
0.9420
15.5950
1.3060
1.0000
4.1210
1.2480
1.8300
0.0580
0.5530
8.0280
12.5270
Tim Kauffman
County Treasurer
100 Jefferson County Pkwy 2520
Golden CO 80419-2520
303-271-8330
http://ieffco.us/treasurer
Bill # 27205 Mort Code:
Legal Description
Section 27 Township 03 Range 69 Qtr NW
SubdivisionCd 035640 SubdivisionName APPLEWOOD PRESERVE FLG 2
Block Lot 0003 Size: 14626 Tract Value: .336
See reverse side of this form for additional information.
Payments may be made online at http://jeffco.us/treasurer.
Original
Amount Due
156.8
946.6
21.8
362.4
30.3E
23.24
95.76
29.00
42.53
1.35
12.85
186.55
291.10
Valuation Actual Assessed
6 Total 80,130 23,238
6 Messages
9 Complete Legal Description is on file in the Assessor's Office
D Our records indicate that there are no improvements on this property
94.6950 2200.54 Type
* Represents a Mill Levy Reduction -Reduction in actual value
Original
2200.54 Current Tax Year Amount
Payments
Current Year Taxes Dues
RETAIN THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS - IF PAYING IN PERSON BRING ENTIRE TAX NOTICE
DETACH HERE AND RETURN THIS COUPON WITH PAYMENT
SAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO:
efferson County Treasurer REAL PROPERTY TAXES DUE IN 2016
00 Jefferson County Pkwy 2520 Tax Year/ Payable
iolden CO 80419-2520 2015 2016
❑ Check here for a receipt
Full Payment or 1st Half Coupon
FICCO LOUIS J
3650 VANCE ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6293
II'�III�IIII"Ilr���'��Illllrl�I�IriI�III���IIiI����illl�ll���lll
Charge/Adjustment
2200.54
2200.54
0
2200.54
PIN
300439652
39-272-15-057
FIRST HALF DUE BY FEBRUARY 29, 2016 ❑ 1100.27
FULL AMOUNT DUE BY MAY 2, 2016 ❑ 2200.54
30043965200002200543000011002714
Rev. 5/2014
Submittal Checklist: Variance
Project Name:
Project Location: 32,10 _Ins C+
Application Contents:
A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a
unique physical hardship is present. The following items represent a complete variance
application:
1 Completed, notarized land use application form
Application fee
Signed submittal checklist (this document)
_4. Proof of ownership—e.g. deed
PA5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s)
_AL6. Written request and description of the proposal
_LZInclude a response to the variance review criteria—these are found in Section
26-115 of the municipal code
Include an explanation as to why alternate designs that may comply with the zoning
standards are not feasible
_✓ Include an explanation of the unique physical hardship that necessitates relief
;xt(Ac7. Survey or Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) of the property
To -scale site plan indicating existing and proposed building footprints and setbacks
F8LII-9.-
Proposed building elevations indicating proposed heights, materials, and color scheme
As applicant for this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with
this submittal. I fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded,
the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, I understand that in the event any
revisions need to be made after the second (2nd) full review, I will be subject to the applicable
resubmittal fee. _
Signature: Date:
Name (please print): Phone:.– o� �- aykc
t .nmmun1ry i jPVPinnmant i )PnnrtmPnt • la(1"il 75iri-7R46 • www ni whpntririnP rn iic
Litt of uneat _,iuoe
03/09/2(1.6 1i:24 CDbA
LOUMAR ENTITIES
CDA812554 AMOUNT
FMSD ZONING APPLICATION FEES _►40.00
PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT
CHECK: 4465 '40.00
TOTAL 280.00
---------------------------------------
LOUMAR ENTITIES
City of Wheatridge
03/08/16 Bill #
03/08/16
Lou -Mar checking 200.00
4465
200.00
City of
W heat idgc
LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
7500 West 29th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846
(Please print or type all information)
Applicant Louis J Ficco Address 3265 Iris Ct
City Wheat Ridge State CO
Owner Same as above
City
Address
State
Zip 80033
Zip
Phone 303-263-0489
Fax 303-423-2561
Phone
Fax
Contact Same as above Address Phone
City State Zip Fax
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written
conununication to applicant and owner.)
Location of request (address): 3230 Iris Ct
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
O Change of zone or zone conditions O Special Use Permit O Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
0 Consolidation Plat O Conditional Use Permit O Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
O Flood Plain Special Exception O Site Plan approval D Temporary Use, Building, Sign
O Lot Line Adjustment O Concept Plan approval ® Variance/Waiver (from Section )
O Planned Building Group O Right of Way Vacation O Other:
Detailed description of request: We are requesting a Variance in max Lot Coverage.
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Number: 300439652 Size of Lot (acres or square footage): 14626sf
Current Zoning: f? I Proposed Zoning: ScLmL
Current Use: vacant lot Proposed Use: SFR
1 certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-attorney from t e o er which approved of this action on his behalf.
Signature of Applicant
ubscribed and sworn to me this day of /�� , 20
To be filled out by staff -
Date received 3 ./ /(G
Comp Plan Desig.
Related Case No.
Kf1THRYN A FIELD NA�� Pub�.��
NOTARY PUB
L C M commission ex /
STATE OF COLORAQO y expires S//�v�
Fee $ 2 6O GC Receipt No. Case No. U-: ;N - I (z - C ;
Zoning eS } ' { C 1 1 Quarter Section Map hV �-J :.2 -7
Pre -App Mtg. Date Case Manager 1 \\ ,, C .