HomeMy WebLinkAbout3300 Ames StreetThe City of Wheat midge
insDection Check List notes
Mid -Roof
Notes
1
Company Name; ty =1�-
Inspector signature: 1 Y
Date of Inspection: /0 �
CUSHMAN
SCIENCE
e>•
LLC
September 18, 2019
Ames Partners LLC
19510 W. 55th Place
Golden, CO 80403
Re: Drilled Pier Installation Observation - Garage
3300 & 3308 Ames St
Wheat Ridge, CO 80212
CG Project No. 18-075
195 South Hoyt Street
Lakewood CO 80226
303-475-7993
david@cushgeo.com
References: Geotechnical Engineering Recommendation Report by Cushman Geoscience LLC, Job No.
18-075 dated July 23, 2018
Foundation Plans by Barton Consulting Services, Job No. 18-209S, dated May 7, 2019
As requested, a site visit was conducted on September 17, 2019 to observe the installation of 13 drilled piers for
the garage foundations at the subject site.
The elements observed were found to be in general compliance with the referenced design documents.
Please contact our office if additional information is needed on this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Cushman Geoscience LLC
Observed by:
Patrick J. Cole
Geotechnical Engineer
Reviewed by:
YC
C=ZAjjr
O • O�
.
UaQ ,5 * F -o
w 5p00� f ,
Eric M. Czaikowski, P.E.
Senior Engineer
Digitally Stamped PDF via email to addressee, printed copies mailed upon request
i Digitally signed by Eric M. Czaikowski
Eric M. Czaikowsk
Date: 2019.09.18 09:45:19 -06'00'
The City of Wheat Ridge
Inspection Check List Notes
Final Roof
Notes
Company Name: Certified Building Consultpnts
J 2
Inspector Signature:
Date of Inspection: /,al , l
CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 5 of 5
The City of Wheat Ridge
Inspection Check List Notes
Final Roof
Roof Inspection
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Structural roof components
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Flashing for roof and walls
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Structural roof components
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
If new sheathing is installed verify that it is listed in the
permit description (Valuation must be adjusted)
Q
N/A
�`
Pass
❑
Fail
Verify sheathing nail pattern (See Policy and Procedures)
N/A
❑
Pass
❑
Fail
Crickets and saddles where needed
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Verify B vent must have boot same gauge as pipe
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Verify vent caps
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Step flashing shall be min. of 4x4 piece per shingle
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Ice and water shield 2' in heated wall spaces
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fall
Underlayments must follow 2012 IRC/2012 IBC
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Verify roof slope for proper drainage
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Dripedge shall have min. 2" of overlap
❑
N/A
t
Pass
❑
Fail
Dripedge should extend down min. 2" past roof deck
❑
N/A
Y_ Pass
❑
Fail
Dripedge shall be mechanically fastened 12" OC
N/A
❑
Pass
❑
Fail
90 LB roll roofing shall not be applied to roof slopes less than
2:12 slope: Exception, detached garages, patios, carports, open
on three sides with min. slope of 1:12
N/A
❑
Pass
❑
Fail
Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min. slope 1/4:12 slope must be
installed in accordance with the manufacturer's letter of
warranty with the address on the letter for final inspection
Metal Roof Shinales
Requirements
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less than 3:12
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min. of 8" from the
centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at
the flow line with the sections overlapping a min. of 4"
Tile Roof Requirements
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete the shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment
CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 4 of 5
Company Name:
Inspector Signature:
Date of Inspection:
The City of Wheat Ridge
Inspection Check List Notes
Mid -Roof
Notes
Certified Building Consultants
CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 3 of 5
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less than 3:12
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof
t� N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min. of 8" from the
centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at
the flow line with the sections overlapping a min. of 4"
Tile Roof Requirements
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete the shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment
CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 2 of 5
The City of Wheat Ridge
Inspection Check List Notes
Mid -Roof
Roof Inspection
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Structural roof components
❑
❑
N/A
N/A
/,',Pass
X Pass
❑
Fail
Fail
Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist
❑
Flashing for roof and walls
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
If new sheathing is installed, verify that it is listed in the permit
description (Valuation must be adjusted)
❑
N/A
ass
❑
Fail
Verify sheathing nail pattern (see Policy and Procedures)
/�ZO N/A
❑ Pass
❑
Fail
Crickets and saddles where needed
❑
N/A
Pass
A,
❑
Fail
Verify vent must have boot same gauge as pipe
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Verify vent caps
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted
❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Step flashing shall be min. of 44 piece per shingle
poN/A
❑ Pass
❑
Fail
Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage
/❑
N/A
Pass
❑
Fail
Ice and water shield 2' in heated wall spaces
❑
N/A
Pass
o
Fail
Underlayments must follow 2012 IRC/2012 IBC
❑
N/APass
❑
Fail
Verify roof slope for proper damage
❑
N/A
4Pass
❑
Fail
Dripedge shall have min. of 2" overlap
❑
N/A
� Pass
❑
Fail
Dripedge should extend down min. 2" past roof deck
❑
N/A
K7Pass
❑
Fail
Dripedge shall be mechanically fastened 12" OC
AD N/A
/ ❑ Pass
❑
Fail
90 LB roof roofing shall not be applied to roof slopes less than
2:12 slope. Exception, detached garages, patios, carports, open
on three sides with min. slope of 1:12
[,a
N/A
❑ Pass
❑
Fail
Above roof insulation R -25
l
N/A
❑ Pass
❑
Fail
Below roof residential R-38
�G
N/A
❑ Pass
❑
Fail
Below roof commercial R-32
�rP
N/A
❑ Pass
❑
Fail
Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min. slope 1/4:12 slope must be
installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
Must have manufacturer's letter of warranty with the address
on the letter for final inspection
Metal Roof Shingles Requirements
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less than 3:12
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof
t� N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min. of 8" from the
centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at
the flow line with the sections overlapping a min. of 4"
Tile Roof Requirements
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete the shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope
N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment
CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 2 of 5
a)
L
a)
a M aa)
QE =3
:3 cn
Z
aE E
O L L
a. a. a_
= o
O
E
EE
a
� = Q
L L
X00
r- .f
CL
a a -
L
O
U
L C
—_
a
N
(U
Q D _ :3
E�p�
NC�
C
q
(c
a
Cy
cis
a
L
O C U E U
a)a-+ L
cc
0 -0
-0
..
C Co Z U
o04 =O .a) a)
0
L C
N O
�r
oEcy)c
V)
C
V
U
L C
—_
(U
Q D _ :3
E�p�
a) ca
a) N
>
L
O C U E U
cpm
0— Ea
cu cca V
L
o04 =O .a) a)
...
�U)�
.c
++ C)
CCOa) E -p
V)
C
CV)
as "0 O a)
E0)
,..0-
UCCc
—
O cm
cm U)•a
U ca w- -- L
U
a t E
a
a o
00
_�
= U O
O
m
O ��
f
Y — p >
M
a-.
a o
m Cl)
o �, a C -)cc
ca �, cmu)
p=orn
Q—UcEa)c
CN N
O
00a)00
LL, L C co
'a) —
E�� a)
C:
a)
E
L
a
a)o oo3E
�a44—)cm coE
�0
C
C E
(n C
U
L
U
a) a) a)
L D_ — O U
4)
Co
Oocoomuo
,OEom
N
E c
V
v c C-oN1.
Yj )
cc O
(D
UFu O
cp OaN
a)
cZU
O
N
C >+ >+ a) a
U U U
a)E a) U C
L L (Q
42
aaa
���D_��
cuE
ccc
cfl
CD c
O
— v
N
D_
� ti
> O
0 O
CU
m E
U
N `C m
a) 0
CL C
C p� 0 0
41 C >, a)
E O C D -
co
d O O 0
3 � U •—
c O O Q
Y L ++
U c mrn
Q 3 C) -
.S
p 0 c40)
.�
_ C m
EEn°'
0 ca
y.1 L LL
U) ca
L •- a (D
Q) a) L C
as
0oa)oa
Oa.'—>' _
c 00
o c-00
d Q O i
C
a a
0 L.
E .0 a
4-
(D
L
v
ay
t
O
a)
.t5
O
u3
N
L
cn
E E
.cn
O
U
U (D
a) D•
L U
U .E
c
O
(D
4-
O
cu
a a
3 c
a)
cn >
a)
c c
Os
U
O cp
c0
rn0)
O
cn -
I— m
re trv�
Test Notes
No notes entered.
Flow Equation Parameters - Factory Default
Retrotec rCloud
Fan Model Retrotec 1000/2000
Fan Serial Number 1 FN002062
Flow equation parameters - B1
Units Used For Flow Parameters in Equation CFM
Fan pressure (FP) is the measured fan pressure when using a self -referenced fan or when the room pressure is
negative. If using a fan which is not self -referenced, and the room pressure is positive, fan pressure is calculated
by subtracting the measured room pressure from the absolute value of the fan pressure.
If PrA is greater than 0 or fan is self -referencing: FP = jPrBj - PrA
If PrA is less than 0 or fan is self -referencing: FP = PrB
Flow calculations are not valid if fan pressure is less than either MF or (K2 x IRPI)
FP =ran pressure, RP = room pressure
Range
N
K
K1
K2
K3
K4
MF
Open
0.5214
519.6183
-0.0700
0.8000
-0.1150
1
8.6
A
0.5030
264.9959
-0.0750
1.0000
0.0000
1
12
B
0.5000
174.8824
0.0000
0.3000
0.0000
1
10
C8
0.5000
78.5000
-0.0200
0.5000
0.0160
1
10
C6
0.5050
61.3000
0.0540
0.5000
0.0040
1
10
C4
0.5077
42.0000
0.0090
0.5000
0.0005
1
10
C2
0.5200
22.0000
0.1100
0.5000
-0.0010
1
10
C1
0.5410
11.9239
0.1300
0.4000
0.0014
1
10
L4
0.4800
4.0995
0.0030
1.0000
0.0004
1
10
L2
0.5020
2.0678
0.0000
0.5000
0.0001
1
10
L1
0.4925
1.1614
0.1000
0.5000
0.0001
1
10
flow =(FP -RPxK1)"x(K+K3x
FP) xK4
3
1�rerrvL'�'�
Test Results Summary
Test Type
Flow Reference Pressure
Time Averaging
Corrected Flow
Air Changes Per Hour
Percent Uncertainty
Correlation
Intercept
Slope
Test Results
Test Data Set 1
Flow Direction
Gauge Location
Retrotec rCloud
Single Direction Multi Point Blower Door Test
50 Pa
10 seconds
796.18 CFM @ 50 Pa
1.711
2.3%
0.998
48.299
0.716
Depressurize
Inside
Baseline Pressure, Initial Pa
-0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.3
Baseline Duration 16 seconds
Average baseline -0.17 Pa
Measured Pressure (Pa) -15.05 -22.45 -29.34 -37.31
Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - C8] (Pa) 17.51 29.29 42.22
Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - B] (Pa) 13.62
Flow (CFM) 332.47 430.64 518.02 645.41
Measured Pressure (Pa) -45.3 -52.23 -61.26
Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - C8] (Pa)
Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - B] (Pa) 17.54 21.03 26.7
Flow (CFM) 732.41 801.98 903.65
Baseline Pressure, Final (Pa)
-0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3
Baseline Duration 14 seconds
Average baseline -0.37 Pa
Retrotec rCloud
Quality Assurance Report
Single Direction Multi Point Blower Door Test
PASS Your Result: 1.71 ACH50 (796.18 CFM50 * 60 / 27921 ft')
Tar et < 4 ACH60
Test Information
Test Name
Test Date
Export id
Company Name
Technician Name
Technician Email
Building Information
Address
City
State
Zip/postal Code
Country
Year Constructed
Elevation
Address Verified?
Building Latitude, Longitude
GPS validation
Estimated Distance From Address
Test Equipment
Fan Model
Fan Serial Number
Pressure Gauge Model
Gauge Serial Number
Environmental Conditions
Pre-test Indoor Temperature
Pre-test Outdoor Temperature
Wind Speed
Average Barometric Pressure
Test Dimensions
Conditioned Floor Area
Envelope Area
Volume
3300 Ames St
2020-05-05 09:32 AM (MDT)
U9DO3JYF
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
Kyle Massler
kyle@uhcdenver.com
3300 Ames St
Wheat Ridge
CO
80212
United States
2020
5469 ft
Yes
39.764028, -105.054404
Latitude/Longitude: 39 763947 -105,054333:
Accuracy: 16 ft
27 ft
Retrotec 1000/2000
1FN002062
Retrotec DM32 10A
402271
75 °F
55 °F
0 MPH
102.6 kPa
2888 ft2
2559 ft2
27921 ft3
�
y
°ro
°03
oa
Oa�nO
ops
CD
°
N
rr
m (D r;
n a
a rr
�•
C" "�
m Ck
w
4 Z
O
'w
� p
-t M
ro
z
f
n p (D
rr
N�de
p y
D' fl
ff
C) =
w a s
IQ
o
°ntr
Z
°
b
m
°
°
7CNc�
y ee
fD
m
@
m
by O
o
H W
N• m0
V]►�CD
K m
un
F-�
(D W N r
" rrA
C
rr
tv
n(DM
°
z
cc Oa v
!:0.fD
a
�
SD
77y
0
0.�
Cc��C�
w w �
o
"
ri
m�,fDd�rn
c '�
°
m
f�
N•
° f7 m
7
z
H
p
N
p
p
0
~ 0
ct
O
m
�H rr
"C
o
rr
n
N.
P. M �
N
CEJ O
o
n
p
0
m � Cr
s eD
'3
0
wQ
r
0
0
CD
R
c
CD
o rn
O
O
a
I�
� ARTON Barton Consulting Services, LLC
CONSULTING 9249 S Broadway#200, STE 102 info@bartonconsulting.co
A"rSERVICES Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 Phone: 303.997.9577
P. E. Schedule Site Observations & Inspections by Text @ 720.458.6658
Feaster Reality June 18, 2020
Attn: Jay Feaster
1415 Park Ave. W. #102
Denver, CO
P: 720.891.7916
E: jqy(kfeasterreally.com
BCS Project #: 18-209
3300, 3308, 3316, & 3324 Ames St.
City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Referenced: BCS Design Documents Project Number 18-209
As requested, we have provided a review of the referenced design documents as it relates to two select items identified
on the detached garage by a representative of the City of Wheat Ridge Building Department. Based upon that review we
have provided the following commentary.
• The LPI roof I joist framing is an equivalent substitution for the propose 210 TJI I -Joists. No
remediation required.
• The 2-2x6 garage window headers are adequate to support the applied design loads. No remediation
required.
We trust this letter meets the requirements for the City of Wheat Ridge Building Department. Please do not hesitate to
contact us if you need additional information on this matter.
Reviewed and Stamped By:
Scott D. Barton, PE
Phone: 303.997.9577 - Barton Consulting Services LLC - info@bartonconsulting.co
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
Inspection Type:
Job Address:
Permit Number:
INSPECTION NOTICE
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been mad 14or-remip ection a1-303-234-59:
Dat nspec
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTI
Inspection Type: Z
Job Address:
Permit Number: ##
`t
,ze �Al?
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yeses
When corrections have been made, 9e -inspection online at:
httpYAvww.ci.wheatridge.co.uslinspdic ,
Dam, Inspe f o
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
InspectionType:
Job Address: 2
Permit Number: (�
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yew
When corrections have been made, se ale for re -inspection online at:
http✓/www.ci.wheatridge.co.uslinspeption �. ,
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:'
Job Address: _
Permit Number:` (
t
❑ No one available for inspection: Time / --..-:P AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes'No
When corrections have been made, sch .dule for re -inspection online at:
http✓/www,ci.wheatridge.co.uslinspecn \
Inspector:
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: P-1 C /" /-'f'/7_/ r`
Job Address:�t�
Permit Number: //S-) 5
r
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http.I www.ci.wheatridge.co.usAInspection
Date: Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: �--� v `
Job Address:
Permit Number:,
❑ No one available for inspection: Time �AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes,/
ule for re -inspection online at:
,/ No
When corrections have been mad
httpYAvww.ci.wheatridge.co.uslins _ ctionn
19. t:,. I 4 •
. -- ` I
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
_��9rBuilding Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:
Job Address:
Permit Number: \ C> Ci 5
lUe C 4 • /V-- P
r
E✓i✓ i H �, ` � ��� �'?`G Cir S -
❑ No one available for inspection: Time `7-'0
Re -Inspection required: No
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Date aul(o Inspector: `
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: n--) � --4--
Job Address: CSC) -P1f C �>
Permit Number: L� l C( C� \ LC,
�4
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
f
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http✓/www. ci. wheatridge. co. usfinspection
Date:-)-- Inspector: >"
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
m
(A
2§ƒ/%^
7
\»\7/\
.{
/\ƒ0/f
'
¥
:3 p7
e777-&
a§/\\i
B4OE$
®®\\
E\7
\7»77E
mem
2m�oo
{/G&/\
gaff
«w
&#D/
«\
CD&¥\
=r
0
CD
�_»0
0)0
{\e-32
/gym/#E
CD
�
D
D Uj
ƒ2§%o
»`GQ(
°
(DCL
Cf,
/2
�f >
F
E@r\=
�
=D 0
CL0
/
�/\ \
/§ §
\
/w
9;o Z aged laved uo!uadsul;ooll agp!y;ea4M J9J
ivawAepapun alqnop au!nbai uapun pue ZT:ti sadolS Vej ❑ ssed ❑ V/N
adols ZtiZ/T Z'u!w a ane4 11e4s alp a4aa:)uoa pue AeIJ Hej ❑ ssed ❑ V/N
s;uawajln aa;oob 51!1
„b;o •ulw a 2utddeIJDAO suo!Pas a44 Pm auII moil aqT
le u!-;I!nq q!j JDIJaA!p 4selds 4S!q „ q/£ ;o •u!w a pm au!lia;uaa /
ayT ww; „g;o 'Mw a puaixa pe4s Su!4sel; AapeA IelaW !lej ❑ ssed ❑ V/N R
;ooj se leua;ew awes ay; aq p qs 8u!4sel} Aallen Ie3aW I1ej ❑ ssed ❑ V/N V
ZT:£ ue4T ssal adols uo papelsu! aq jou pegs salsu!gs;oa Ie3aV4 pej ❑ ssed ❑ V/N
s;uawaj!n as sal u!4S 3oo21 Ia3aW
uo!.Padsu! Ieug ao; Aa13al aq; uo
ssaippe a4l gjIm ATuejaem;o jaual s jajnpe;nuew ane4 isnVy
•suo!;eaq!aads s uaanue}nuew a4l y;!m aauepjouue ui pallelsui
aq jsnw adols Zl:ti/T adols •u!w Odl'WOd3 'uawnl!g pa!}IpoW
I!ej
❑
ssed ❑
V/N
J2(
Z£ -2l lepjawwo:);oa molaq
Hej
❑
ssed ❑
V/N
�r
8£-21 le!4uaplsaa;oa molag
I!ej
❑
ssed ❑
V/N
SZ -u uo!;elnsu! jooi anogV
Red
❑
ssed ❑
V/N
lu
ZT:T;o adols •u!w 41!m sop!s aajgl uo
uado 'sUodieJ 'soiled 'sa2eueS pape;ap 1uo!jd9ax3 'adols ZI:Z
uegj ssal sadols jooi of pa!ldde aq jou lleys lu!}oa;oa 9106
I1ej
❑
ssed ❑
V/N
�p—/
JO „ZT paua;se;A!Ieu!ueyuaw aq pegs 9SpaduO
I!ej
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
pap ;ooi;sed „Z •u!w umop puaixa pinogs agpoduO
Ilej
❑
ssed W
V/N
❑
deljano „Z;o •u!w aney 11egs a8paduO
Hej
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
aSewep uadoid jo3 adols;oou Aj!aaA
ped
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
J81 ZTOZ/Jill ZTOZ mo1lo; Isnw sivawAeljapun
ped
❑
ssedV/N
11sa�eds
11em palea4 w ,Z platys jalem pue a:),I!ej
❑
ssedCRi
V/N
o
95eu!eup jadoud jo; Molle siaddnas A;!aaApej
❑
ssed ❑
V/N
CV
a1gu!4s jad aaald qxq;o •ulw aq pegs Su!4sel; dajS
I!ej
❑
ssedX
V/N
❑
paisni jo paeewep aue sgu!4sed ou A}uaA
Hej
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
sdea lUaA A;uaA
11ej
❑
ssed p
V/N
❑
ad!d se agne8 owes;ooq aney;snw Tuan A;uaA
11ej
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
papaau aiagm salppes pue S49ND!JJ
I!ej
❑
ssed' ❑
V/N(v
(sajnpaaoJd pue Aapod Das) wailed peu 9u!4;eags NPaA
lied
❑
sse,!�;;e
V/N
❑
(paIsnfpe aq;snw uo!;enleA) uo!ld!a:)sap
;!wad a4; w pa;s!I sl 1! le4l A;uaA'papeisu! s! Ou!q;eags mou;l
lied
❑
ssed ,}��
V/N
❑
sllem pue;ooj jo; Swgselj
Hej
❑
ssed"ra
V/N
❑
;s!xa saigu!gs;o saaAel Z ue4; ajow ou;eqj A;uaA
I1ej
❑
ssed
V/N
11s4uauodwou;ooi
Iejn7pna3S
pej
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
uo!;aa
sul;ooa
;oob-p!W
sa;oN;s!-1 j oa40 uo!;aadsul
OBp!M ;eaLIM do Aj!3 aql
S 30 £ aVed
laPed uoilaadsul loon a2pi8;eayM :)gD
sluelinsuoo 6wplrn8 pagpoo
saloN
loom-P!W
saloN lsrl 313a4o uo!loadsul
aBP!2j 4eo4M to Alm 041
:uo!loedsul to alep
:aanleuB!g aoloadsu!
:aweN Ruedwoo
S 1 p abed laPed uolloadsul;ooa aBpla lea4AAJ90
luawAeliapun algnop ajinbaa aapun pue ZT:b sadols ped ❑ ssed ❑ V/N
adols ZT:Z/T-Z'ulw a ane4 pegs apl alanuoo pue Aelp lied ❑ ssed ❑ V/N
s;uawm!n OM 400H 8111
„q ;o -mw a 8ulddel19no suolloas aql gllm aull mol; 041
le w-ll!nq q!j jalaaA!p 4selds 48!4 „ ti/E;o wLu a ql!m auipaluao
a41 woj; „g;o •ulw apualxa llegs 2ulgsel; AalleA lelaA lie] 13 ssed ❑ V/N
;ooj se lelialew awes a4l aq llegs 2w4sel; Aallen lelaA ped ❑ ssed ❑ V/N
ZT:E uegl ssal adols uo papelsul aq lou pegs sal8ulgs;oa lelaA lied ❑ ssed ❑ V/N
s}uawa.gn as sal
u!4S;o0b Maya
uolloadsul leug ao; jallal a4l uo ssarppe aql 4llm A1ueajem
;o jallal s iajnloe;nuew a4l 41!m aouepa000e w pallelsw
aq lsnw adols ZT:q/T adols •uiw Odl'A❑d3 'uawnl!g Pa4!poA
lied
❑
ssed
❑
V/N
ZT:T do adols •uiw 41P saNs aaJ41 uo
uado 'sliodaeo 'soiled 'sagejeB papelap 'uolldaax3 :adols ZT:Z
uegl ssal sadols;ooi o1 palldde aq lou lleqs 2ul}oo1 pa 91 06
lie]
❑
ssed
❑
V/N
0O paualse; Apeoluegaaw aq llegs a2padlap
lied
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
„ZT
joap;ow lsed „Z •ulw umop pualxa pinoqs a2padp(i
lied
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
delJano;o „Z •ulw aneg pe4s a8padu(i
ped
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
aOeulejp iadoid jo; adols;oa A;uaA
ped
❑
ssed
X
V/N
❑
Dal ZTOZ/]al ZTOZ mono} Ism sluawhellapun
lied
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
saoeds Ilem palea4 ul ,Z p1014s Salem pue aol
lied
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
a2euleip ladoid io; mope siaddnas AVOA
ped
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
al2ul4s rad aoaid yxb;o •uiw aq pegs gulgsel} dalS
lied
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
palsm jo pagewep aje sSwgsel; ou A;laaA
lied
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
sdeo luaA A;uaA
ped
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
adld se a2ne2 awes looq aneg lsnw luaA g A;!aaA
lied
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
papaou a.iagm salppes pue slamou0
ped
❑
ssed
❑
V/N
(saanpaooad pue Aallod aas) uaalled lieu 2u141eags A;uaA
ped
❑
ssed
V/N
(palsn(pe aq ism uoilenleA) uolldiaosap l!wjad
aql u, st ll legl A;IJBA papelsui sI 2ulgleags mau A
Ile]
13
ssed
V/N
13sluauodwo-j;ooa
palsll
lempnils
lied
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
seem pue;ooi jo; 2ul4seld
ped
❑
ssed
V/N
❑
;slxa sal8uigs;o vaAel Z uegl ajow ou legl A;uaA
ped
❑
ssed
V/N
13a
sluauodwoo lolemlonils
lied
13
ssed
�
V/N
❑
u0110a sul}00H
sa;oN;s!-! 310843 u0!;oadsul
GBP!114804M d0 43 041
S do S abed
laved uopadsul;ooa aEpia jeagm :)gD
:uoi;oodsul;o a;ed
:ain;euft .io;aadsul
slu jinsuoo 6uiplm8 p94!jj9C) :auaeN Auedwoo
saaoN
loom Jeu1=1
sa;oN;s!-I 10043 uoe;oodsul
OBPIM WOW Jo AM3 841
SN0liO3dSNl WN01ilGO`d 2JOd LJIAO 33S
.....r- �Annw niI I in mnniddw o i jou. 31Jonn gelS-ul / nnoleg jo punoi6aapun aanoO;ON o(3
punoi6aapun aul-I ja;em 90Z
apejE:) uo gelS L06
Ued aannogS 96£
joua;ul punoiblapun 6ulgwnld 17OZ
y
6upla0 anogy - 6wgwnld gbnoa 176E
slleM walS 906
aoua;ul punoi6aapun jamas ZOZ
6ulgwnld g6noa E6£
�_,+ s a � ".
_ ,,_. �
as;;a-'3'd / 6ul100d EO6
6upla0 anogy- IeoluegoaW g6noa Ll£
QY)
scald / suossle0 Z06
sluawwoo
jo;oadsul alep
suo!loadsul uollepunod
aa;aNi Ieola;oal3 06E
6upl90 anogy IeOla10913 g6noa 60£
�
Ieola;oa13 g6no2J 80E
ja;alni ;suo0 dwaiz6s
uopoadsul IIeM aaagS 170E
;oob-pm 90E
��
0
bulgleags loob EOE
6ulgleagS IIeM ZO£
Aoloadsul ale(]
suolpedsul g6no-d
sluawwo0
.....r- �Annw niI I in mnniddw o i jou. 31Jonn gelS-ul / nnoleg jo punoi6aapun aanoO;ON o(3
suoi;oadsul anogy agl 10 lenoiddy of JolJd alaaouoo rood ION OO
punoi6aapun aul-I ja;em 90Z
apejE:) uo gelS L06
.aolaa;x3 puna6aapun 6ulgwnld 9OZ
joua;ul punoiblapun 6ulgwnld 17OZ
y
- aolaa;x3 puna6aapun jamas £OZ
slleM walS 906
aoua;ul punoi6aapun jamas ZOZ
l!npu00/alge0/le0l40913 Jn 60Z
�g
s;uawwo0
0 oadsul ale suolloadsul gelS / puno.i6japun
suoi;oadsul anogy agl 10 lenoiddy of JolJd alaaouoo rood ION OO
3(100 80r � � SS3�aad bJlIW2i3d
aao a uol oadsul ue sanba
vv-
6ulMopol agl uogoadsul ue anlaoaa of (Ad 656L) 1HOINaIW � q l l b
alis loafoid aql uo pa;sod sl paeo sig; ssalun pawaoped aq lou ll!m suoi;oadsul
uol;oadsul aql to (ep aql •w,e g ajojeq wao; auiluo eq; ein palllwgns aq;snw suollellaoueo
uoiloodsui/sn•oo•96p!aleagnn•io•nnmm//:duq :wjo; auiluo uoiloadsul
auO33N N01103dSNI
apejE:) uo gelS L06
uol;elnsul Ilene uol;epunod 906
y
,J( ,,
slleM walS 906
-Va0 >oeglaS uollepunod 1706
as;;a-'3'd / 6ul100d EO6
scald / suossle0 Z06
sluawwoo
jo;oadsul alep
suo!loadsul uollepunod
3(100 80r � � SS3�aad bJlIW2i3d
aao a uol oadsul ue sanba
vv-
6ulMopol agl uogoadsul ue anlaoaa of (Ad 656L) 1HOINaIW � q l l b
alis loafoid aql uo pa;sod sl paeo sig; ssalun pawaoped aq lou ll!m suoi;oadsul
uol;oadsul aql to (ep aql •w,e g ajojeq wao; auiluo eq; ein palllwgns aq;snw suollellaoueo
uoiloodsui/sn•oo•96p!aleagnn•io•nnmm//:duq :wjo; auiluo uoiloadsul
auO33N N01103dSNI
uo!s!n!Q 6u!plmg ay; /`q a6e1I0n nnol leou;0813
pue;ou;s!e ani ay; Aq pa;aldwoo eje suogoodsul gbnoa;egl alns aq aseald s;!wlad a6e;I0n MO -1 Joj
(ouedn000;o uo!;ezuoglne
a;n;!;suoo;ou seop uo!;oadsul 6u!pl!ng leUld aq;;o lenouddy panss! s! /ouednoop;o a;eo!;!luau
e ajo;aq 6u!pl!n8 pue aulg 's>IaoM o!lgnd '6uluueld /`q panadde pue palaldwoo aq;snw swat! py :a;oN
:3(100 sorV� ( �:SS3aaad 5bQ Qb ��P:lIW2�3d
snoauellaos!n £Z£
000nlS/glel/IelaW GOE
`' , _.. , a • I ;” )_.� (.G !,
jawee jodeNdeaM 9sn0H 7ZE
slleM JannogS/paeog ajn;s!oW LZ£
'loafoad anoA aol loplslp u0110040ad
aalj ag; loe;uo0 aseald suo!loadsui a.i!l uoj,,,
L98Z-SEZ-£OE Ilea aseald
suo!;oadsui a6eweip pue Mpa'slioM a!lgnd Aoj„,
978Z -9£Z -EOE Ileo aseald
suog0adsul6u!>fjed pue 6u!deospuel'6uluoZJoj,
:aouenpe u!
40ane auo sappue asap; wwl suogoadsu! lsanball
I!eN Pue MaJoS IIemj(j(i OZ£
uo!;oadsul leu!j 6u!pl!ng S7
lenaddy asuaoi� ssaulsng
umloadsul leulj 6u!uoZ 264
iw6l/ll aaleM iwolS 9L7
,Ieulj s laoM o!Ignd 947
,,,u0!10alad aa!j / dsul ad!j 7L7
,uol;oadsul u!eld poolj SL7
_
„uol;oadsul Plalj Md Z47
6ulddolS aiij L LE
Jool)/nnopu!M leu!d W,
7
;00a leu!j 604
6u!gwnld leu!j 207
leolueg0alnl leulj 907
leo!d;0a13 leu!d E07
sluawwoo
slelllul aled
joloadsul suo!loadsulleu!j
:3(100 sorV� ( �:SS3aaad 5bQ Qb ��P:lIW2�3d
snoauellaos!n £Z£
000nlS/glel/IelaW GOE
`' , _.. , a • I ;” )_.� (.G !,
jawee jodeNdeaM 9sn0H 7ZE
slleM JannogS/paeog ajn;s!oW LZ£
I!eN Pue MaJoS IIemj(j(i OZ£
uopelnsul90£
..
(widwocsuoileileuad)6Ulwejj gbnob LOS
�✓+ k3P
asealab ja;aW seE) Z07
al
;sal ainssaid au!lseE) LOB
6ulddolS aiij L LE
sluawwoD 7ol0adsul a;ep
(panu!luoo) suo!loadsul g6noa
:3(100 sorV� ( �:SS3aaad 5bQ Qb ��P:lIW2�3d
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:
Job Address:
Permit Number:
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes
When corrections have been made, c- a%i r re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Datez— 0 InspebtAo
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: �3 -r�� �4A-T�
Job Address:�,�-�
Permit Number:
❑ No one available for inspection ;,Time4A
Re -Inspection required: Yes'; No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
httpYlwww.ci. wheatridge.co.uslinspection
Date:—,! : `? - nspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
r.
Inspection Type: R),J)C L.� op
Job Address: I 33oo nyn t 5
Permit Number: i U G T
❑ No one available for inspection.
Re -Inspection required: Ye
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
httpYAvww. ci. wheatridge.co. usrnspection
Date: 1(,A,: 0 - ` c7 Inspector: )) �''
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
®®� i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: V� 6 fie`
Job Address:(�Y'!C_S
Permit Number: C-) 0 `m 0, C:
Aij � z�,r, k,
❑ No one available for inspection: Time fit'' AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http✓/www. ci. wheatridge. co. ushnspection
Date: _ ` \ . \ �, Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:t JobAddress:
Permit Number:
LA
❑ No one available for inspection: Time-. n�) AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes o^
*When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at.
hUp✓/www.ci.wheatridge.co.0sfil nspea�fa - - ---
Date: 9 • �� Ind ecto
DO NOT R WQ' VE THIS NOTICE
A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:
Job Address:
Permit Number: K, c , c,,
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
httpYlwww.ci. {whheeatridge.co.uslinspection
Date: 1 Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:t JobAddress:
Permit Number:
LA
❑ No one available for inspection: Time-. n�) AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes o^
*When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at.
hUp✓/www.ci.wheatridge.co.0sfil nspea�fa - - ---
Date: 9 • �� Ind ecto
DO NOT R WQ' VE THIS NOTICE
A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:
Job Address:
Permit Number: K, c , c,,
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
httpYlwww.ci. {whheeatridge.co.uslinspection
Date: 1 Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
A CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: V"
Job Address: o
Permit Number: _ ;? C \ C, 0 \ o C, —s
VJ
J
J No one available for inspection: Time t AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http.-Ilwww.ci. wheatridge.co. uslinspection
Date:— Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: {�Sv`\ C. �'_k U "
Job Address: no C_`�
Permit Number: D13 k CA U � CSC,
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http✓/www. ci. wheatridge. co. u-%rinspection
Date: Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: -'� i 4 s V✓�
Job Address: 3'J)G U 4::)-rn E
Permit Number: 14(> 01 % 10C.1 E�
❑ No one available for inspection: Time "' L ') AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http://www. cL whea tridge. co. uslinspection
Date:. 1 � I Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:
Job Address: i
Permit Number: C
_r� 6—C 1
[-A No one available for inspection: Time]! M_/PM
Re -Inspection required: Yep No;`
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http✓/www. cL wheatridge.co. uslinspecfioiT
Date: IkJ
F 1 Inspecto
®O NOT RE E THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
4--,) Z_ &; `r ;�; -
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: �= 1� `��!-��•�� cS
Job Address:
Permit Number: :_?_ �V)
❑ No one available for inspection: Time �:�/AMIPM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http✓/www. ci. wheatridge. co. usrnspection
Date: (z , - 61, Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: :�l �, !"I :
Job Address:? 2�27�1 A
Permit Number:
❑ No one available for inspection: Tirr
Re -Inspection required: Yes No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http✓/www. ci. wheatridge.co.uslinspection
Date:—/ �?• 19 Inspector: ¢'�'�-----
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:
Job Address:
Permit Number: 45
❑ No one available for inspection: Tim QEQ(KM__/1PM
Re -Inspection required: Des No
When corrections have been made, sche ule for re -inspection online at:
http//www.ci.wheatridge.co.unspection----_�__
Date/nspect r:
l`1 1
A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: U� -`� VQ-A LjL
Job Address`` -
Permit Number:. q� F'
❑ No one available for inspection: Tim�'p iAI1 PM
Re -Inspection required: Yes/',/ No)
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303 -234 -
Date:) 15',
03-234-
Date:)15', ;2-- Iq Inspector: r---- --
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
'`Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
.Inspection Type: �
Job Address: , ca
Permit Number:�'j
44�fz =-:X-&--
❑ No one available for inspection:.,TimeAM
Re -Inspection required: Yes No-,-)
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Date: 13 Inspector:
—
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: lf:!�?--f�
Job Address:
Permit Number:I
❑ No one available for inspection: Timef _k:) �&/Pm
Re -Inspection required: Yes'," No �
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
s^
Date: ( Inspector: ---
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTI E
Inspection Type: ;�� r&.�
Job Address: 33,E E�5 —"-- V_
Permit Number:!'
s
❑ No one available for inspection: Time... ANklPM
., '
Re -Inspection required: Ye$ ---No.-,,
w:
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Date: e -7L >� Inspector: k.4- --_
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: 9'� KJ _ L) C4
Job Address:
Permit Number:��
❑ No one available for inspection: Time
Re -Inspection required: Yesc
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Approved by:
l ilv k)l
W 1Zc%at I is �gc-
Ins for Date
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
FOUNDATION SETBACK AND ELEVATION CERTIFICATION
For Commercial and Multi -Family Developments
This form must be fully completed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of
Colorado. This form must be accompanied by a Construction Control Plan following the
procedure found on the reverse side of this form.
DATE: e7 4
PERMIT# o2r 1�]0 1 Q
ADDRESS: _ 33oco A.-" �rs S 1
LOT _Z, BLOCK SUBDIVISION
SURVEYOR:
I hereby certify that the elevations and distances shown on the attached sheets and as stated
below for the recently formed or constructed structural foundation for the above property have
been measured by me or directly under my supervision.
The MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCES from the property lines have been determined to be:
FRONT: - Z4 05 . REAR: 7&1 zy SIDE: 8 Zy SIDE: t6
The foundation corr ELEVATIONS (NAVD88) have been determined to be:
7
FRONT: syr= REAR: S 6 S 7I_ 5
SIDE: " G S ? y SIDE: s_`/6 a -7--
All measurements have been determined on the following location:
(Check only one): Top of proposed foundation wall prior to placement of concrete
-Top of foundation wall subsequent to placement of concrete
The
Signed
Professional Surveyor
Print
Date o
are included on the attached Construction Control Plan.
JV .
38m
Rev 11/2019
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection` Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
r"
Inspection Type: f-2�—-
Job Address:
Permit Number:
I
❑ No one available for inspection: Time ti JAM/AM
Re -Inspection required: Yes;" I: o_)
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Date:Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:��
Job Address: a?22.�ne.s f
Permit Number: -7>C>
❑ No one available for inspectioa�_Tirne( _�PM
Re -Inspection required: Ye�No
When corrections have been made, cAltl -inspection at 303 -234 -
Date:. �rJej'Inspector: -
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
N* i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
Inspection Type:
INSPECTION NOTICE
L-; r-, \ \
Job Address: UCSD
Permit Number: C-) C)
O'D e- 0 V
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -Inspection required: e No
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Date: i��- L , I c' Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: 103— ]
Job Address: =^�
Permit Number: fl -
❑ No one available for inspection: TiME
Re -Inspection required: Ye6No
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Date: . ---.;v--?" �'
'�' Inspector:
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
`®®s CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office o (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type: U
Job Address:' --
Permit Number: , C� 1_ �', (�; ( ) C, `a
r
(
❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM
Re -inspection required: Ye(� No
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Date: =
,�� ' Inspector:
'
®O NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:
Job Address:
Permit Number:`?
❑ No one available for inspection: Time/4' AM/PN
Re -Inspection required: YeNo�
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Date: p/ Inspector:
c p
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 234-5933 Inspection line
(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax
INSPECTION NOTICE
Inspection Type:
Job Address: ~' C� ✓'ri C
Permit Number:
❑ No one available for inspection: Time " AM/PM
f,
Re -Inspection required: lies No
When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933
Date: ,` ! Inspector: iJ
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
City of Wheat Ridge
Duplex - New PERMIT - 201901095
PERMIT NO: 201901095 ISSUED: 07/08/2019
JOB ADDRESS: 3300 Ames St EXPIRES: 07/07/2020
JOB DESCRIPTION: New 2 story duplex with unfinished basement - 1,930 sq ft total with 830 sq
ft detached garage
*** CONTACTS ***
OWNER FEASTER JAY
GC (303)369-7977 TOMMY CAGLE
SUB (303)522-3872 LUIS MORGAN
SUB (720)272-1288 DIEGO TELLEZ
SUB (303)289-2070 LLOYD LADD MATTHEW ROBLEDO
190113 Q BUILDERS, LLC
110057 PROLINE PLUMBING LLC
120187 L&D ELECTRIC LLC
090062 ULTIMATE HEATING & COOLING LLC
*** PARCEL INFO ***
ZONE CODE: UA / Unassigned USE: UA / Unassigned
SUBDIVISION CODE: 2412 / LAKESIDE, STEWART GARDENS, OLI BLOCK/LOT#: /
*** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 425,000.00
FEES
Total Valuation 0.00
Plan Review Fee 2,098.40
Use Tax 8,925.00
Permit Fee 3,228.30
Engin. Review Fee 150.00
** TOTAL ** 14,401.70
*** COMMENTS ***
*** CONDITIONS ***
All roughs to be done at Framing Inspection.
Approved per plans and red -line notes on plans. Must comply with 2012 IRC, 2017 NEC and all
applicable City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Codes. work is subject to field inspections.
As part of the foundation inspection and PRIOR to the placement of concrete and before
proceeding with any further construction, a completed, signed and sealed, Foundation
Setback and Elevation Certification shall be submitted to the City for review. The
certification form shall be fully completed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the
state of Colorado, stating that the foundation was constructed in compliance with all
applicable minimum setback and elevation requirements of the City.
Owner/Contractor is responsible for locating property lines and constructing improvements
according to the approved plan and required development standards. The City is not
responsible for inaccurate information submitted within the plan set and any construction
errors resulting from inaccurate information.
Prior to project completion or granting of a Certificate of Occupancy, an As -Built Survey
or Improvement Survey Plat shall be submitted to the City.
Landscaping removed or damaged during construction must be replaced prior to final
inspection.
No C.O. may be issued until public improvements are complete as identified in the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
All landscaping shall be in conformance with Section 26-502 of the Zoning and Development
lOMS-
prior to C.O., a landscape escrow agreement with financial guarantee in the amount of 125%
of the cost of the installation shall be required.
ROW permit required for sidewalk construction.
I, by in signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanyingg approved plans and specifications;
applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am tl�e legal owner or have been authorized
by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with
this permit. I further attest that I am leggally authorized to include all entities named within this document as parties to the work to be
performed and that all work to be performed disclosed in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications.
Signature of OWNER or �;6id'fRACTOR (Circle one) Date
I. This permit was issued based on the information provided in the permit application and accompanying Flans and specifications and is
subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures.
2. This. permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and
received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Budding
Official and maybe subject to a fee equal to one-half of the originalpermit fee.
3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard
requirements, fees and procedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of
the Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed.
4. No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a changeof the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval.
5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required
inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services
Division.
6. The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any provision of any
applicable code or any ordinance or regilition of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to field inspection.
Signature of Chief Building Offlcigf Date
REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY.
�6A41
City of
i�?�WhcatP dge
CommuNrry DEVELOPMENT
Building & Inspection Services
7500 W. 29t1 Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Office: 303-235-2855 " Fax: 303-237-8929
Inspection Line: 303-234-5933
Email: permits(a-)ci.wheatridge.co.us
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date:
aq�cq
Plan/Permit # Clqp)oq�
Plan Review Fee: �/ 0
Building Permit Application
*** Complete all applicable highlighted areas on both sides of this form.
Incomplete applications may not be processed. ***
Property Address: 3300, MME, Ames St. Wheat Ridge, CO
Property Owner (please print): Jay Feaster Phone:
Property Owner Email: jayCofeasterrealty.com
Tenant Name (Commercial Projects Only)
Property owner Mailing Address (if different than property address)
Address: 19510 W. 55th PI.
City, State, Zip: Golden, CO 80403
Arch itectlEngineer: Michael Fiebig, AIA / Fiebig Architecture
Architect/Engineer E-mail; michael@fiebigarch.com Phone: 303.594.7584
Contractor Name: Tommy Cagle / Q Builders LLC
City of Wheat Ridge License #: 190113
Contractor E-mail Address: gbuilders123@a gmaii.com
Phone: 303.369.7977
'For Plan Review Questions & Comments (please print)
CONTACT NAME (please print): Jesse Donovan Phone: 720.504.8629
CONTACT EMAIL.(please print): jesse@brightlightereng.com
Sub Contractors (Must provide Wheat Ridge License No +& Signed Subcontractor Authorization form)
Electrical: Plumbing: Mechanical:
W.R. City License # W.R. City License # W.R. City License #
Other City Licensed Sub: Other City Licensed Sub:
City License # City License #
Complete all highlighted fields.
❑COMMERCIAL ❑X RESIDENTIAL
Provide description of work: For ALL projects, provide a detailed description of work to be
performed, including current use of areas, proposed uses, square footage, existing condition and
proposed new condition, appliance size and efficiency, type and amount of materials to be used, etc.
Project includes construction of two new duplexes (4 units) on the existing 18,762 SF parcel.
Each duplex will be 3,860 SF gross above -ground square footage (two stories) and have a 1,930
SF footprint. The duplexes will include unfinished basements with rough plumbing for future
build -out. Each duplex will have an 830 SF detached garage. The lot size will be 56'x151' for a
total area of 8456 SF per duplex. Included with the duplexes will be site work (approved through
the ODP and SDP and Plat process) including a private alley, infiltration pond on a separate
1,850 SF tract, and new curb, gutter, and sidewalks. The current site is bare ground with no
improvements on site. t�) 1JAL"y1v
Sq. FULF
'1 BTUs
Gallons
Amps Squares For Solar: Kw # of Panels Requires structural
For Commercial Projects Only: Occupancy Type: Construction Type:
Occupancy Load: Square Footage:
Project Value: (Contract value or the cost of all materials and labor included in the entire project)
1,700,000 for the entire project ($425,000 per application)
OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT
I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or
regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown and allegations made are
accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance
with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application; that I am the legal owner
or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property to perform the described work and am also authorized by the legal owner of any
entity included on this application to list that entity on this application. 1, the applicant for this building permit application, warrant the
truthfulness of the information provided on the application.
CIRCLE ONE: (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) or AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE of OWNER (CONTRACTOR)
Signature (first and last name): _ ' z, DATE: 5/29/2019
Printed Name: Jesse Donovan
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
ZONING COMMMFNTS: Q,.I_vl
Reviewer: !2�e A19 ('7049 4 / 4 /('?
BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMM TS:
Reviewer;
6jt3II�
OCC fPANCY-CLA'SWICK"PON: 2?
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: d) 420C.'r 11__IFAI1 j c7CWN'��TS _ rep
Reviewer:
Building Division Valuation:
City of
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BUILDING AND INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION
7500 W 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 p. 303.235.2855.f 303.237.8929
Proof of Submission for Permitting/Plan Review
(Water and Sanitation only)
A copy of this form must be completed by each water and sanitation agency indicated on the Permit Submittal
Checklist for the project type and be attached to the Building Permit Application at the time of submission.
Applications presented for submission without a completed Proof of Submission form from a required
agency will not be accepted or processed.
Date:
Project Address:
Name of Firm/Individual submitting documents:
Type/Description:
Signature of Firm Representative or Individual:
s1�4,eX-
I, ([ ks &"P— , am a duly authorized representative of the agency
indicated beloVand do, by my signature below, hereby acknowledge receipt of documents necessary for review
and approval df the project indicated above.
Agency represented: (Please check one)
Wheat Ridge Water District
o Consolidated Mutual Water District
o Valley Water District
o Denver Water
Agency Notes:
•
Wheat Ridge Sanitation District
o Clear Creek Sanitation District
o Fruitdale Sanitation District
o Westridge Sanitation District
o Other
Signatur Date:
(Agency Repre I
entative)
4.
9 $
City of ``
idgc
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BUILDING AND INSPE'TIION SERVICES DIVISION
7500 W 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 p. 303.235.2855.f 303.237.8929
Proof of Submission for Permitting/Plan Review
A copy of this form must be completed by each agency indicated on the Permit Submittal Checklist for the project
type and be attached to the Building Permit Application at the time of submission. Applications presented for
submission without a completed Proof of Submission form from a required agency will not be accepted or
processed.
Date: �', ► 3- M
Project Address
>3Do- 330$- 311• 5r3
Name of Firm/Individual submitting documents
Project T
JhL
Signature of Firm Representative or Individual:
DO NOT
I, C)"A qfl 4i A -
and do, by my signature below, hereby ac
the project indicated above.
Agency represented: (Please check one)
o West Metro Fire Protection
o Arvada Fire Protection
o Wheat Ridge Water District
o Consolidated Mutual Water District
o Valley Water District
p, Denver Water
Agency Notes: 4 Id
THIS POINT - FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
am a duly authorized representative of the agency indicated below
vledge receipt of documents necessary for review and approval of
o Wheat Ridge Sanitation District
o Clear Creek Sanitation District
o Fruitdale Sanitation District
o Westridge Sanitation District
o Other
-3 9 oa , ¢1., , 3 3 O B, 3114
Signature: Date:
gency pres tive)
City of
Wh6atj�idge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUB -CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZATION FORM
This form must be signed by each sub -contractor.
This form will not be accepted with missing information.
Subcontractor's City of Wheat Ridge License number must be provided in the applicable space.
Sub c tractor's ance and I'Mnse must be up to date prior to permit issuance.
Sao—
Project Address: 3 3W 14 01W5 Permit #:
General Contractor:
Electrical Sub -Contractor
Company Name:
State License #:
Wheat Ridge License #:
Signature of Authorized Agent
Plumbing Sub -Contractor
Phone #•
Master #•
(required field)
Date
Company Name: rf C ,i yam' &Mb m Phone #: G S ,� u - 3r 72 -
State License #: 2 i ` q Master #: LK 69 Z.
Wheat Ridge License #: I0 C> 5'7 .._...._.__(required field)
Signatu e o Authorized Agent Date
Mechanical Contractor
Company Name:
Wheat Ridge License #:_
Signature of Authorized Agent
Phone:
_ ____ ...,(required field)
Date
City of
Wh,6at
COM
� �� "
� "
SUB -CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZATION FORM
This form must be signed by each sub -contractor.
This form wiR not be accepted with misiing information.
:Subcootraetor's City of hcxt Ridge Lk*msc�wmbev iumst bye -provided in the a"file .space.
Subcnntractc r_s `insurance and lUmuse most -be ap -to date prier to permit ids*rice.
Project Address: ;500, :�;�t�Y;�-�{„ "�1{ 'Permit #:
—
General Contractor:
Electrical Snub -Contractor
camparry Name- � V `l c.. . Pirrrrre #._..:� - 2
State License #: Master #:�L2
Sign atu of Aa riztd Agent arse
Plumbing Sub -Contractor
Compa Name-.
Phone ##:.
,State License-#: ?gaster #:
Wheat i2idge License #:(required tielc#)
S g otvry -f Awthoriaed Agent I oaltc
Mechanical Contractor
Company Name: Phone:
requi-red frebij.
Signature of Authorized .Agent Date
City of
IF V h6
COMMUNITY "."j" 49-C
0m t
UNiTy DEVELOPMENT
This form must be signed by each sub -contractor.
This form will not be accepted with missing information.
Subcontractor's City of Wheat Ridge License number must be provided in the applicable space.
Subcontractor's insurance and license must be up to date prior to permit issuance.
Project Address: 3;, 33pye�3 .3-3 2- Permit
e15- .51-71—
General Contractor: (?5 2 _. o,,< -
Electrical
,,<-
Electrical Sub -Contractor
Company Name:
State License #:
Phone 9:
Master #:
Wheat Ridge License #: (required field)
Signature of Authorized Agent
.Plumbing Sub -Contractor
Company Name:
State License #:
Wheat Ridge License M
Signature of Authorized Agent
Mechanical Contractor
Date
Phone #:
Master #:
_(required field)
Date
Company Name:Phone:
Coo, 0
M�*mt Ridge License#: %Cj) —(required field)
LI
S/ gnature of Authorized Ag�ht Date
Jesse Donovan
From: Kral, Bruce
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 3:22 PM
To: Jesse Donovan
Cc: Keith, Wayne; Charlie Keener
Subject: RE: 3300 Ames - West Metro Submittal
Attachments: 2019_03_26 AMES SDP REV3.pdf; 3300 AMES - CD.PDF
Hello Jesse,
Based on a preliminary review -
The proposed access from the public streets and alley provides adequate fire access. The existing fire hydrant is
acceptable for the required fire flow.
Permits are required from the fire district for non-residential core and shell, all work on automatic fire protection
systems, all work on automatic fire detection systems, underground fire line and for the storage of hazardous materials.
WMFPD reserves the right to provide additional comments/requirements at the time when plans are formally submitted
and reviewed per applicable codes and amendments.
Bruce Kral, CFO
Fire Marshal
West Metro Fire Protection District
433 South Allison Parkway
Lakewood, CO 80226
(303)989-4307 ext. S13
bkral@westmetrofire.or�
Fire is
Everyon,W#
t^VM-
This email is not intended to provide approval of any design elements. The comments contained herein are only offered
for use by the designer and are based on conceptual ideas and not a thorough review. Approval will only be provided
upon the submittal of formal plans for review. Further comments and requirements may be provided at that time.
From: Jesse Donovan[mailto:jesse@brightlightereng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 5:25 PM
To: Kral, Bruce
Cc: Keith, Wayne; Charlie Keener
Subject: 3300 Ames - West Metro Submittal
Bruce,
I believe we sent this site to you for review previously, but we wanted to double check. See attached for the CD set as
well as the elevations for the proposed two duplexes at 3300 Ames. Thanks,
Jesse Donovan, PE I Principal
Brightlighter Engineering LLC 1 720-504-8629 direct
3253 N. Gaylord Street, Denver, CO 80205
iesse@brightlightereng.com I www.brightlightereng.com
!!!! CAUTION: This email originated from outside West Metro Fire Rescue's email server. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and have positive sender verification of the purpose of this email. Never
enter USERNAME, PASSWORD or sensitive information on linked pages from this email. !!!!
RESIDENTIAL Building Permit - Plan Review Worksheet
Address: _ 33D01 �'� a $ 3 31 b 5324
Lot Size: sq. ft.
Rev. 09/2017
-� Q�rwedl
Zoning: �� �/ W*- t8-zs/�6
Lot Width:
lil
Property in the flood plain? If yes, notify PW Floodplain Administrator and add surveying condition FLD
Subdivision: J;;. C,-, 4e,,(- Any conflict? (Y/N) C& -gyp 1'\,e3 w ( T (Z N)
Related Cases: A&IZ - l$_2 S / 26 , NlS - V6 - 0
Type of project (applicable survey conditions in parenthesis):
Maximum Lot Coverage: q- 0 %
Existing Improvements (footprints):
House: sq. ft.
Shed: sq. ft.
Detached garage: sq ft.
Other: sq. ft.
Total Existing sq. ft
Lot Coverage %
sq. ft.
Proposed Improvements (footprints):
House/addition: sq. ft.
Shed: sq. ft
Detached Garage: sq. ft.
Other: sq. ft.
Proposed+Existing
Lot Coverage
Required Setbacks: FR S S R
Provided Setbacks: FR S S R
sq. ft
For additions or new construction, is the structure within 2 feet of minimum setbacks?
If yes, add surveying condition FND.
Maximum Height: I- ft.
Proposed Height: Its g ft.
N
Maximum Size:
Proposed Size:
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
Does the bulk plane apply? (Y/N)
If yes, does it meet on all sides (Y/N): FR S S R
(See 26-642 and 26-120.C.1 — applies to all single-family structures (new, addition, accessory) in R -1C and R-3)
Parkland Conditions
Does the permit result in a new dwelling unit (new structure or conversion from non -res use)?
If yes, have parkland dedication fees already been paid (eg with a previous land use approval)?
If fees are owed, add condition PFEE, notify owner, notify building division, enter fee amount in ADG.
Rev. 09/2017
Streetscape Conditions
Does the permit result in any of the following conditions?
❑ Construction of new roads ❑ Platting of new lots
❑ New development ❑ Additions that increase gross floor area (not just the footprint) by
60% or more
(proposed floor area — existing floor area ) / existing floor area = % increase
If any box above is checked...
For SF/DUPLEX—Is there existing ❑ Curb ❑ Gutter L15 -ft+ sidewalk adjacent to the property?
If curb, gutter or sidewalk is missing, streetscape construction or fees -in -lieu will be required.
MULTIFAMILY—Does the frontage meet current city standards?
If not, streetscape construction or fees -in -lieu will be required. PRW
Fees -in -lieu of dedication or construction are due at the time the permit is issued. 7
Access onditions (apply to all new driveways, garages, additions, or new homes/units)
For one and two-family dwellings, the first 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of
pavement into the site shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar materials.
❑ For all uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer
than 25' to any property line, except when used as joint access for two or more lots.
❑ In residential zone districts, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 feet in width.
❑ One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the street accesses
are at least 30 feet apart, measured from the interior edges.
❑ For all uses, one access point per property is permitted.
Landscaping Conditions (apply to additions and new dwelling units)
❑ For one -and two-family dwellings, one tree for every 70 feet of street frontage is required.
Frontage of lot - width of driveway _� / 70 = (round up for required trees)
Street trees required: Street trees provided:
❑ 100% of the front yard and 25% of the entire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance of C.O.
?�In the event that landscaping cannot be installed due to inclement weather prior to the issuance of
a C.O., an escrow agreement with financial guarantees may be allowed to ensure future
installation. 125% of the cost of the proposed improvements will be required with the agreement.
These funds will be reimbursed back to the roperty owner or contractor once the improvements
are in place. ` „ _� c c
Dwelling Unit cpt> 's Tc-_�'5
p(,k ❑ Not approved as an independent dwelling unit.
42000 loqs-341 01 Oq ?
CUSHMAN
GEOSCIENCE
& LLC
Geotechnical Investigation and Foundation Recommendations
3300 Ames St
Wheat Ridge, CO 80212
Project Number 18-075
July 23, 2018
Prepared For
Ames Partners LLC
Attn: Jay Feaster
19510 W. 55th Place
Golden, CO 80403
Cushman Geoscience LLC
195 S Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226
303-475-7993
david.cushmangeo@gmail.com
y
CONTENTS
Scopeof Work...............................................................................................................................................1
Existing Construction and Site Conditions....................................................................................................1
ProposedConstruction.................................................................................................................................1
SubsurfaceInvestigation...............................................................................................................................2
SubsurfaceConditions.................................................................................................................................. 2
LaboratoryTest Results................................................................................................................................ 3
Discussion of Expansive Soils........................................................................................................................3
SitePreparation............................................................................................................................................4
SiteExcavation.............................................................................................................................................. 5
Foundation Recommendations.....................................................................................................................5
Alternative Basement Foundation Recommendations........................................................................................6
FoundationWalls.......................................................................................................................................................7
FloorSlabs.....................................................................................................................................................7
SubsurfaceDrainage..................................................................................................................................... 8
SurfaceDrainage...........................................................................................................................................8
ExteriorFlatwork...........................................................................................................................................9
Radon............................................................................................................................................................ 9
Mold.............................................................................................................................................................. 9
CrawlspaceRecommendations.....................................................................................................................9
Limitationsand Exclusions............................................................................................................................9
References..................................................................................................................................................10
Tables
Table 1: Subsurface Conditions Summary .........................
Table 2: Groundwater Summary ........................................
Table 3: Laboratory Test Results Summary .......................
Table 4: Summary of Risk Categories .................................
Attachments
Figures
Appendix A
Appendix B
........................................................................... 2
........................................................................... 2
........................................................................... 3
........................................................................... 4
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226
cx" d
��009a
*o0
A609 V001
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 1
As requested, Cushman Geoscience LLC (CG) has prepared geotechnical engineering recommendations
for the proposed residential structures planned for the subject site.
Scope of Work
The scope included drilling exploratory boring(s), obtaining soils and/or bedrock samples at intervals in
the bore holes, and subjecting the samples to various laboratory tests as outlined herein and providing
geotechnical recommendations.
The recommendations presented herein are based on the subsurface conditions observed in the boring(s)
and the laboratory testing results. Additional subsurface exploration and/or laboratory testing may result
in recommendations that may differ to some degree than those presented herein. There is no guarantee
or warranty as to the uniformity of subsurface materials and conditions at the subject site. An additional
discussion of the limitations of geotechnical engineering is included in Appendix A. As noted in the
appendix, this report should be considered valid for 3 years after issuance.
Existing Construction and Site Conditions
The site is currently a vacant lot.
At the time of the investigation the lot was vegetated with a good cover of wild plants and grasses. The
ground surface slopes gently to the north.
Surficial Geology on the site is mapped as Loess (windblown silt with fine sand and clay) according to
"Geologic map of the Arvada quadrangle, Adams, Denver, and Jefferson Counties, Colorado" by R.M.
Lindvall, USGS Map GQ -1453, 1979. Bedrock below the upper soil appears to be Denver and Arapahoe
Formations of Paleocene and Upper Cretaceous age. A geologic map is shown in Figure 1.1
Proposed Construction
Planned construction for the site includes two duplex structures with detached garages. The duplexes are
proposed to be two stories over a basement and the garages to be one story with a slab on grade floor.
The structures will have reinforced concrete foundations and will be built with wood and/or steel framing
and possible veneer materials. Structural loading will be relatively light consistent with the proposed
construction, on the order of 300 to 3,000 pounds per linear foot. Site grading will be minimal. An existing
site plan is presented on Figure 1.0.
If the proposed construction varies significantly from that described above or herein, CG should be
notified to re-evaluate the recommendations provided in this report as necessary.
City of
Wheat Ridge
Building Division
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 2
Subsurface Investigation
The subsurface investigation was performed by drilling three (3) test borings (B-1, B-2, and B-3) on the lot
at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1.0. The test borings were drilled on May 18, 2018 using a
4" diameter solid stem auger, powered by a CME -45 drill rig.
As noted in the Boring Log, Figure 2.0, samples were obtained using a "modified California" sampler. The
samples were obtained by driving the sampler into the subsurface materials at selected depths during
drilling. The modified California sampler is a steel barrel sampler with a 2.5 -inch outside diameter and a
2 -inch inside diameter that is fitted with 4 -inch long brass liners during sampling to facilitate retrieval and
transport of relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface materials.
The sampler was driven into the subsurface materials using a 140 -pound hammer falling through a height
of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 12 inches is recorded and provides an
indication of the relative density of granular materials and relative consistency of cohesive, fine grained
soils.
Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface conditions encountered in test borings, B-1, B-2, and B-3, are summarized in Table 1 below. A
log of the test borings is presented on Figure 2.0. Note: all measurements are approximate based on tools
and methods used in the field.
Table 1: Subsurface Conditions Summary
Boring No.
Depth (feet)
Soil Description
B-1
0-2
Clay, silty, sandy to very sandy, scattered gravel, hard,
moist, brown
B-2 2-6.5
B-3 0-8
B-1
2-4
Gravel, silty, clayey, moist, brown
B-2 0-2
B-1
7
7 -- 30
Sandstone/Claystone bedrock, intermixed and
interlayered, very hard, moist, brown, gray, olive
B-2 — 20
B-3 8-20
Groundwater encountered during drilling and measurements after drilling are summarized in Table 2
below. Note: all measurements are approximate based on tools and methods used in the field.
Table 2: Groundwater Summary
city of
Wheat Rid9e
Building Division
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 3
Boring No.
Time Relative to Drilling
Groundwater Depth (feet)
Caving/Mud Depth (feet)
Swell Potential
N
During drilling
dry
-
B-1
10 minutes after
dry
open
10,300
3 days after
28
28.6
13.9
During drilling
dry
-
B-2
10 minutes after
dry
open
112
3 days after
19.8
20
B-2
During drilling
dry
-
B-3
10 minutes after
dry
open
9
3 days after
dry
19.7
Laboratory Test Results
Samples obtained during the geotechnical exploration program were returned to our laboratory where
the soil descriptions and boring log were reviewed by a senior geotechnical engineer or senior engineering
geologist. Selected samples were then tested in the laboratory for moisture content, dry density, and
swell -consolidation potential. Results of the laboratory tests are presented next to the boring log in Figure
2.0 and in Table 3 (below) and in Figures 3.0 — 3.9.
Table 3: Laboratory Test Results Summary
Boring
No.
Depth
(feet)
Moisture
Content
N
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Swell Potential
N
Swell Pressure
(psf)
Swell Risk
B-1
4
12.4
111
4.1
10,300
high
B-1
9
13.9
118
-0.2
N/A
low
B-1
19
19.5
112
1.0
3,200
low
B-2
4
10.1
111
2.4
4,700
moderate
B-2
9
18.3
111
0.1
1,600
low
B-2
14
21.2
106
0.8
4,700
low
B-2
19
18.0
106
0.3
1,400
low
B-3
4
11.9
106
1.8
2,700
low
B-3
9
9.6
113
0.0
N/A
low
B-3
19
1 15.8
1 113
-0.2
N/A
low
Discussion of Expansive Soils
The amount of volume change that results when a sample of soil or bedrock is inundated with water under
a constant pressure is measured in the Denver swell -consolidation test as the swell/expansion or
consolidation potential. The swell pressure is the amount of pressure that is then required to compreFF ly of
the sample back to the volume before inundation. Wr,eut midge
Building Division
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 4
The geotechnical engineering practice in the Colorado Front Range area uses a relative classification to
evaluate the expansion potential of soil and bedrock. The expansion potential is categorized as low,
moderate, high, or very high based on the swell potential. The following table presents the relative
classifications. Additional information regarding risk is presented in Appendix A.
Table 4: Summary of Risk Categories
Slab Performance Risk Category
Representative Percent Swell
(500 psf Surcharge)
Representative Percent Swell
(1000 psf Surcharge)
Low
0 to< 3
0 to< 2
Moderate
3 to < 5
2 to < 4
High
5to<8
4to<6
Very High
8 or greater
6 or greater
Source: Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers, 1996.
Note: The representative percent swell values presented are not necessarily measured values. Rather,
they are a judgment of the swell of the soil and bedrock profile likely to influence slab performance.
Site Preparation
Prior to site grading, areas to be graded should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, debris and other
deleterious material. Stripped materials should be wasted off site in accordance with applicable
regulations. However, non -hazardous stripped soil with vegetation can be used as shallow fill in non-
structural, landscaped areas of the site. All manmade fill or demolition debris should be removed from
below the planned foundations and floor slabs, and replaced with properly compacted structural fill.
Structural Fill Material: Imported structural fill material should be non -expansive at the recommended
placement moisture content and density, classify as a coarse-grained material (sand or gravel) by the
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), and have a liquid limit less than 40 and a plasticity index less
than 20. Frozen material, ice, snow, cobbles and boulders larger than 3 inches, debris and other
deleterious material should be excluded from fill materials. CG should be contacted to test and evaluate
whether proposed on-site or imported materials are suitable structural fill.
Suitable imported structural materials would be: CDOT Class 5 or 6 road base, CDOT Class 1 Structure
Backfill, or a manufactured 'crusher fines' material. Imported materials should be approved by the
Geotechnical Engineer.
Fill Placement: Structural fill should be placed in lifts 8 inches or less in loose thickness, moisture
conditioned and compacted to 95 percent or more of the standard Proctor Maximum Dry Density (MDD).
Fill which classifies as silt, sand or gravel by the USCS should be moisture conditioned to within 2
percentage points of Optimum Moisture Content (OMC), and fill which classifies as clay by the USCS
should be moisture conditioned to within OMC to 4 percentage points above OMC. Fill in non-structural
areas should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the MDD.
City of
Wheat Ridge
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226
Building Division
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 5
Site Excavation
The sandy, silty, clay soils classify as Type B soils per the OSHA Excavation Guide. All excavation slopes are
to be laid back per the OSHA Excavation Guide for Type B soils at a maximum 45 -degree angle (1:1
Horizontal to Vertical). The excavations should be performed under the supervision of the contractors
`Competent Person' per the OSHA Excavation Guide.
The slopes may require to be further laid back if seepage or instability is observed in the foundation
excavations. The contractor should manage construction traffic and the placement of excavation spoils to
maintain excavation slope stability.
If site constraints prevent appropriate excavation sloping, the foundation excavation can be shored using
drilled concrete piers. Our office can prepare an excavation shoring design for this project if needed.
Foundation Recommendations
Due to the potential for significant differential movement for shallow foundations, the safest foundation
type for the proposed structures is straight shaft, steel reinforced, concrete piers drilled into the
underlying bedrock.
The following recommendations should be followed in the design and construction of the foundation
system.
1. Piers initiated within 3 feet of the existing ground surface (i.e. garage, porch, and crawlspace
levels) should have a minimum length of 18 feet and a minimum bedrock penetration of 6 feet.
Piers initiated 8 to 10 feet below the existing ground surface (i.e. basement level) should have a
minimum length of 12 feet and a minimum bedrock penetration of 6 feet. All piers shall have a
minimum diameter of 12 inches.
2. Piers should be designed for an allowable end bearing pressure of 37,000 psf and a side shear
resistance of 2,500 psf for the portion of the pier in bedrock. Side shear resistance should be
ignored for the upper 5 feet of the pier shaft and the bottom pier diameter, or 1 foot for a 12 -inch
diameter pier.
3. Piers should be reinforced the full length as recommended by the structural engineer.
Reinforcing should be adequate to resist an uplift pressure of at least 45,000 pounds per foot of
pier diameter.
4. Grade beams between piers should be provided with a minimum 4 -inch void space at the bottom.
5. Pier tops should not be allowed to mushroom. The top of all piers should be formed with
cardboard tubes.
6. Caving soils and groundwater were encountered in the test borings shortly after drilling or When
? I ��
checked 3 days after drilling. Based on our observations, casing of the pier shafts is not expected,
Wheat Ridge
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Building Division
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 6
but dewatering may be required. Concrete should be placed in the caissons immediately after
drilling using "drill and pour" techniques to minimize the need for dewatering.
7. Concrete should be placed by the tremie method if more than 3 inches of water is encountered
in the bottom of the pier shaft at the time of concrete placement. The tremie pipe should be
lowered to the bottom of the pier shaft prior to concrete placement and should be kept below
the concrete surface during concrete placement.
8. CG should observe pier drilling and construction.
Alternative Basement Foundation Recommendations
A spread footing foundation supported on native soils or properly compacted structural fill can be
considered to support the proposed structure(s) at the basement elevation only with the entire
excavation below the clay stratum and all footing elevations are at this level.
Spread Footing Recommendations
New foundations should be designed based on an allowable soil bearing pressure of:
3000 psf maximum and 500 psf minimum at a typical basement elevation (about 8 to 10 feet
below grade).
Additional spread footing foundation design and construction considerations:
1. The total and differential settlements are estimated to be approximately 1 inch or less.
2. Spread footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous footings placed on
material as described above, and 24 inches for isolated pads.
3. A minimum 4 -inch void should be used below grade beams if needed to develop the minimum
dead load pressure.
4. Footings placed beneath unheated areas should have at least 36 inches of covering soils to protect
from frost. This depth should be verified with the local building department.
5. Lateral resistance to the spread footings is based on both friction between the footing and its
subsoil and passive earth pressures of the soils on the side of the footing. An ultimate coefficient
of friction of 0.35, and a passive pressure based on an equivalent fluid weight of 180 pcf for the
soils is recommended.
6. The foundation system should be reinforced to span an unsupported length of 10 feet.
7. It is required that a representative of the Engineer observes the foundation excavation prior to
foundation construction and/or fill placement in order to evaluate the possible fill soils.
8. The foundation excavation should be protected from runoff, and multiple wetting and drying
cycles. Runoff into the foundation excavation should be avoided.
City Of
wheo} Pid9e
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 8ui1ain9Divsion
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 7
Foundation 'Walls
Foundation walls which are laterally supported and expected to undergo a minimal amount of movement
should be designed with based on a lateral "at -rest' earth pressure computed based on an equivalent
fluid weight of 60 pcf if the onsite soils are used as backfill. Topsoil should not be used as backfill.
The earth pressure can be reduced to 50 pcf for "active" conditions where significant wall deflection can
occur, such as at site retaining walls. A passive pressure based on an equivalent fluid weight of 180 pcf for
sandy, silty, clay is recommended. These pressures assume drained conditions behind the foundation
walls. The buildup of water behind a foundation wall will increase the lateral pressures on the wall.
All foundation walls should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as:
adjacent buildings, traffic, construction materials and equipment.
These pressures assume drained conditions behind the foundation walls. The buildup of water behind a
foundation wall will increase the lateral pressures on the wall.
Foundation Wall Backfill Placement: In landscape areas, foundation wall backfill should be compacted to
at least 90% percent of the standard proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) near the optimum
moisture content (OMC). In areas of external and interior flatwork (i.e. sidewalks, driveways, garage
slabs), foundation wall backfill should be compacted to at least 95% percent of the standard proctor
maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) at or slightly above the optimum moisture content.
Floor Slabs
The onsite soils are suitable to support slab -on -ground construction, with a low (at basement level) and
moderate (at existing grade level) risk of slab heave due to potentially expansive soils. Potential floor slab
movement of less than 1" exists at the basement level and 2" to 3" exists on the site near the ground
surface, assuming a depth of moisture variation ("depth of wetting") of about 20 feet. Structural floors
over a crawlspace or minimum 12 -inch void space should be used if this potential movement is not
acceptable to the owner or builder.
Slab Design: To reduce the effects of differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all
bearing walls and columns with expansion joints that allow for unrestrained vertical movement. Partitions
should not be designed or constructed to bear on slabs supported on grade. A 3 -inch void should be
established below or above partitions during construction and monitored and maintained by the owner
after construction. The void space can be covered with a molding strip that is not attached to the partition.
Joint spacing should be determined on floor thickness, nominal aggregate size, slump, and be consistent
with the recognized guidelines such as the Portland Cement Association and the American Concrete
Institute.
Cracks and movement of the slabs supported on grade can be transmitted through rigid floor coverings.
Performance expectations should be taken into consideration in the selection of floor slab coverings.
City of
Wheat Ridge
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Building Division
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 8
Floor Slab Subgrade: Some areas of soft and/or loose soils may be encountered in the floor slab areas.
Some subgrade improvement of these materials may be required at the time of excavation as directed by
the engineer. Soft or disturbed soils observed in the excavation should be compacted on grade or removed
and replaced with structural fill. Any fill placed below structural areas should consist of granular, non -
expansive soil compacted to at least 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698)
near the optimum moisture content.
Plastic Moisture Barrier or Gravel Layer: Based on subsurface conditions observed in the test boring(s)
and our understanding of the planned construction, a plastic moisture barrier and 4 -inch gravel layer to
protect a slab near the ground surface is optional for this site from a geotechnical standpoint. Applicable
building codes may require these items.
Interior Plumbing: All plumbing lines should be testing for leaks. Where plumbing lines enter through the
slab, positive breaks should be provided. Connections to mechanical equipment should be flexible.
Any new fill placed beneath floor slabs should be a non -expansive, granular material compacted to at least
95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density near the optimum moisture content.
Subsurface Drainage
It is recommended that below grade, finished or usable living space be protected from surface water
infiltration with a perimeter drain system. The drainage system can be either an interior or exterior type.
Details of typical drainage systems are presented in Appendix B.
Surface Drainage
1. The following drainage precautions should be observed and maintained at all times during and
after construction:
2. Excessive wetting of the foundation excavation and sub -floor soils should be avoided.
3. Exterior backfill should be placed as recommended herein.
4. The ground should be sloped away from the building. A minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 5
to 10 feet in landscaped areas (10%) and 3 inches in 10 feet in paved areas (3%) is recommended.
5. Roof down spouts should discharge well beyond foundation wall backfill zones.
6. Plastic membranes should not be placed adjacent to the foundation walls. A pervious textile
should be used to control weed growth.
7. Any settling of foundation or foundation wall backfill should be re -graded to maintain the slopes
noted above.
City of
Wheat Ridge
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Building Division
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 9
Exterior Flatwork
The subgrade soils should be scarified and compacted to at least 95% of the standard Proctor maximum
dry density near the optimum moisture content in areas of driveway pavement or approach apron for a
garage, if constructed. Proof -rolling of these areas is recommended. Soft and deflecting areas should be
removed and replaced with properly compacted fill.
Radon
Radon may be a potential concern in Colorado. If a crawl space is constructed it should be well ventilated.
if a gravel layer is placed beneath the floor slab it can be incorporated into a radon abatement system if
this becomes necessary in the future. The local building department should be contacted for more
information regarding radon issues in this area. Radon Prevention methods should conform to EPA Radon
Mitigation Standards: EPA 402-R-93-078, October 1993 and revised April 1994.
Mold
Mold can develop in crawl spaces that become damp under certain conditions. If a crawispace is
constructed, it should be well ventilated. A vapor barrier should be placed on exposed soil to help control
indoor moisture levels and should be sealed at the edges and seams. A professional hygienist should be
contacted to address any potential mold concerns and mitigation methods. Refer to A Brief Guide to Mold,
Moisture and Your Home for additional information: EPA 402-K-02-003, dated September 2010, for more
information.
Crawlspace Recommendations (if needed)
A health and safety professional with experience in the design of crawlspaces can be consulted to provide
recommendations to reduce moisture infiltration into crawlspaces. Such recommendations may include
fining the crawispace with polyethylene plastic that is sealed and mechanically attached to the foundation.
Plastic should not be attached to the foundation within 6 inches of untreated wood members of the
framing or flooring. Also, plastic should not be attached to metal framing members such as column posts,
but can be attached to concrete foundations supporting column posts.
Limitations and Exclusions
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices
using the degree and care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently
practicing under the same or similar circumstances, and for use by the client for design purposes at the
named site.
City of
Wheat Ridge
Building Division
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project No.: 18-075
7-23-18
Page 10
The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the data obtained from the
exploratory boring(s) drilled at the approximate location presented on Figure 1, and the proposed
construction. An additional discussion of the limitations of geotechnical engineering practices is presented
in Appendix A. An environmental assessment (ESA Phase I or 11) of the site is outside our scope of work
for this project. This report should also not be considered as an indication of the absence of or as an
evaluation of any potential environmental, geologic or mining hazards for the subject site.
If during construction, fill, soil or water conditions appear to be different than that presented in this
report, CG should be contacted to reevaluate the recommendations presented herein as necessary. A
representative of our office must observe foundation excavations, pier installation, backfill operations, and
foundation bearing strata, as applicable, in order to confirm the recommendations of this report.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact our office.
Cushman Geoscience LLC
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
C� LtC-F�
UO
A
46434 ;
1
David A. Cushman, P.G., CPG Scott Barton, P.E.
Engineering Geologist Project Engineer
Attachments — Figures 1.0 through 3.9
Appendix A — Important Information about This Report
Appendix B — Foundation Drain Details
Distribution: digitally stamped PDF via email to addressee, printed copies mailed upon request
References
Foundations and Earth Structures, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Design Manuals 7.01 and 7.02,
09-01-1986
Guideline for Slab Performance Risk Evaluation and Residential Basement Floor System
Recommendations, Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers, 1996.
City of
CAV/YMA/EMC/DAC/S D B
Wheat Ridge
Building Division
Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226
nA
NOTES: 1) Not to Scale
2) 19 Indicates location of exploratory test boring.
I CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE
3300 Ames St
SITE PLAN
City of
PROJECT NO. 18-07
FIGURE NO. Buildidgbi
M1
KEY QI [_.GESS (HOLOCENE AND PLEISTOCENE)—Yellowish-brown to
- -- light -grayish -brown sanely silt. Upper 2-4 *Pet (03 6-1 2 m) may
contain appreciable amounts of clay and silty clay. Exhibits co-
lumnar structure: slightly calcareous; slightly sticky when wet.
Generally less than 10 feet. (3 m) thick, but may be as much as
20-25 feet ((--7.6 m) thick in northeastern part of quadrangle
SITE LOCATION
SOURCE:
Lindvall, R. M, 1979, Geologic map of the Arvada quadrangle, Adams, Denver, and Jefferson
Counties, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ -1453
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 3300 Ames St PROJECT NO. 18-075'
Geologic Map FIGURE NO. 1.1�
B-1 B-2 B-3
0
41 126/12 24 121112
5
MC=12,4
mc=10.1
mc=11.9
5—
v v
DD=111
.....
DD=111
DD=106
-0.24,
5016.5 0.3
750/7 0.0
..'-1
50/6
—10
MC=13.9
MC=18.3
MC=9.6
10
DD=1 18
DD=111
DD=113
—16
50/3 0.8
:]50/8
:]5015
.....
......
MC=21.2
is
DD=106
.....
3
.....
1.0
50/7 0.3
5016 3 > -0.2
-050/7
—20
mc=19.6mc=18.0 mc=15.8
20
......
DD=112 DD=106 DD=1 13
—25
25-
3
3
—30
50/5
30-
35
36
LEGEND:
CLAY, SILTY, SANDY TO VERY SANDY, SCATTERED GRAVEL, HARD, MOIST, BROWN
GRAVEL, SILTY, CLAYEY, MOIST, BROWN
SANDSTONE/CLAYSTONE BEDROCK, INTERMIXED AND INTERLAYERED, VERY HARD, MOIST, BROWN, GRAY, OLIVE
INDICATES A "MODIFIED CALIFORNIA" SAMPLER WAS DRIVEN
26112 INDICATES THAT 26 BLOWS WITH A 140 -POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO
DRIVE A MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLER 12 INCHES INTO THE SUBSURFACE SOILS
4.1 t INDICATES AMOUNT OF VOLUME CHANGE (%) AND DIRECTION OF SAMPLE MOVEMENT ON WETTING
3 INDICATES DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER AND NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING WAS OBSERVED
3 --> INDICATES DEPTH AT WHICH BORING CAVED AND NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING OBSERVED
MC= INDICATES MOISTURE CONTENT (%) OF SAMPLE DD= INDICATES DRY DENSITY (pct) OF SAMPLE
-200= INDICATES AMOUNT OF MATERIAL PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE (%)
NOTES:
1) THE BORINGS WERE DRILLED ON MAY 18, 2018 WITH 4 -INCH DIAMETER, SOLID -STEM
AUGER POWERED BY A CME -45 DRILLING RIG.
2) THE LOCATIONS OF THE BORINGS WERE DETERMINED APPROXIMATELY IN THE FIELD BY
TAPING OR PACING FROM FEATURES ON THE SITE PLAN AND SHOULD ONLY BE
CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO THE DEGREE IMPLIED BY THE METHOD USED.
3) CHANGES BETWEEN MATERIAL TYPES ARE APPROXIMATE AND TRANSITIONS MAY BE
GRADUAL. GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS MAY VARY SEASONALLYAND FROM YEAR TO
City of
YEAR DEPENDING ON CLIMATE AND OTHER FACTORS.
Wheal Ridge
3300 Ames St PROJECT NO.
18-075
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE
BORING LOGS, LEGEND & NOTES IFIGURE NO.
2.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
E
c -1.0
m -2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0
-7.0
-8.0
100 10000
Vertical Pressure (PSF)
Sample Description: Clay, silty, sand
Boring No. B-1 Moisture Content (%) 12.4
Depth (ft) 4 Dry Density,(pcf) 111
Swell % 4.1
Swell Pressure s 10,300 Yy .
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE ---
_ 3300 Ames St 1project No. -075
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST IFiqure No. 3.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
E
c -1.0
as -2.0
E -3.0
Cn
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0
-7.0
-8.0
100 10000
Vertical Pressure (PSF)
Sample Description:
Sandstone
Boring No.
B-1 Moisture Content (%)
13.9
Depth (ft)
9 Dry Densit , (pco
118
Swell %
-0.2
ur
Swell Presse s
N/A
—City
whet r(
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE
3300 Ames St
_
Project No,
18-075
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST
Figure No.
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
0 1.0
0.0Nk
-
o -1.0
m -2.0
eq
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0
-7.0
-8.0
100
10000
Vertical
Pressure
(PSF)
Sample Description: Cla stone _ Ui
BoringNo. B-1 Moisture Content (%) 19.5 CAW
Depth (ft) 19 Dry Densit , (pco 112
Swell % 1.0
Swell Pressure sf) 3,200
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE
3300 Ames St
Project No, 13-075
SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST
Figure No. 3.2
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0 � I I I I I 11H I I I 1 11111 1 1 _.-L-1 1 1 111
100
Sample Description
Boring No.
Depth (ft)
10000
Vertical Pressure (PSF)
Clay, v. sandy, sil
B-2 Moisture Content
4 _ Dry Densit - (pco
Swell (%)
Swell Pressure (c
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 1 3300 Ames St
I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST
10.1
cal.
2.0
E
Whecrt
>
1.0
0
Iding D;
Project No,
M
Figure No.
3.3
0.0
E
m
-1.0
co
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0 � I I I I I 11H I I I 1 11111 1 1 _.-L-1 1 1 111
100
Sample Description
Boring No.
Depth (ft)
10000
Vertical Pressure (PSF)
Clay, v. sandy, sil
B-2 Moisture Content
4 _ Dry Densit - (pco
Swell (%)
Swell Pressure (c
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 1 3300 Ames St
I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST
10.1
cal.
ill
-
Whecrt
2.4
4,700
Iding D;
Project No,
18-075
Figure No.
3.3
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
0 3.0
aCi 2.0
E
0 1.0
cv 0.0
-1.0
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0
100
Sample Description
Boring No.
Depth (ft)
10000
Vertical Pressure (PSF)
Sandstone, claystone
B-2 Moisture Content
9 Dry Density c
Swell
Swell Pressure (psf)
18.3 city of
1 1 1 Wheat Rig
0.3
2,400 uilding M%
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 1 3300 Ames St jProject No. 18-075
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST IFigure No. 3.4
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
A.
0 3.0
2.0
c 1.0
a� 0.0
a
-1.0
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0
100 10000
Vertical Pressure (PSF)
or
Sample Description: Cla stone, sandstone
city
Boring No. B-2 Moisture Content°lo} 21.2
Depth (ft) 14 Dry Density c 1106
'ot Rids:`
Swell % 0.H
IC'j I(1g Div
Swell Pressure sf) 4,700
i=
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE3300
_
Ames St
Project No. 18-075
E SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST
iFigure No. 3.5
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
0 3.0
V'
�J
W 2.0
E
0 1.0
m
CD 0.0
-1.0
-2.0
-3.0
—
-4.0
-5.0
�-
-6.0
100
10000
Vertical
Pressure
(PSF)
Sample Description: Cla stone
Boring No. B-2 Moisture Content (%) 18.0 W,
Depth ft 19 Dry Densit c 106
Swell % 0.3 auiraf,,f,
Swell Pressure sf) 1,400
e 3300 Ames St Project No, 18-075
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST Figure No. 3.6
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
E
0 1.0
0.0 -
-1.0
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0
100 10000
Vertical Pressure (PSF)
Sample Description: _ Clay, silty, sl. sandy to v. sandy
Boring No. B-3 Moisture Content (%) _ 11.9
Depth ft 4 Dry Density c 106
Swell % 1.8
Swell Pressure (psf) 2,700
CUSHMAN GE OSCIENCE 3300 Ames St I Project No
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST IFiclure No.
wE,ecat k
uildin•n ,..
18-075
3.7
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
0 3.0
2.0
E
c 1.0
ca 0.0
E -1.0
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
i
-5.0
-6.0
100
10000
Vertical
Pressure
(PSF)
Sample Description: Sandstone, cla stone
Boring No. B-3 Moisture Content (%} 9.6
Depth (ft) 9 Dry Density c 113
Swell % 0.0
Swell Pressure (psf) N/A
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 3300 Ames St IProject No. 18-075
SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST I Figure No. 3.8
cion
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
w 2.0
E
0 1.0
a� 0.0
s�
-1.0
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0
100
10000
Vertical
Pressure
(PSF)
Sample Description: Sandstone, claystone
Boring No. B-3 Moisture Content (%) 15.8 cia'
Depth (ft) 19 Dry Density c 113 wheca
Swell % -0.2
Swell Pressure sf) N/A ciuildin ;
3300 Ames St
Project No. 18-075
CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE
SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST
IFigure No. 3.9
cion
Appendix A
Important Information about this Report
The data collected by Cushman Geoscience LLC (CG) during this geotechnical exploration was used to
provide geotechnical information and recommendations based on subsurface conditions for the site
evaluated, the potential effects of those conditions on the proposed structure, and recommended
foundation type for the proposed structure. The stratification lines shown on the boring log(s) are
approximate and actual transitions between materials may be more gradual or more rapid than indicated
on the boring log(s). Actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction may differ from the
subsurface conditions presented herein. This uncertainty can not be eliminated due the variable nature of
geologic conditions. Material characteristics and engineering properties of soil and bedrock may vary
between samples and between borings. The actual material characteristics and engineering properties of
the soil or bedrock may differ from interpretations based on sampled soil and bedrock. Quantitative
conclusions prior to construction regarding the geotechnical performance of a structure are not possible
due to the potential variability of subsurface conditions. Engineering judgment and experience are used
to evaluate the most likely geotechnical performance of the structure and provide geotechnical
recommendations for the structure. There are no guaranties or warranties implied or expressed.
The owner and client must understand that uncertainties are associated with geotechnical engineering
and must determine the level of risk they are willing to accept for the proposed construction. The level
of risk can be reduced, but not eliminated by more extensive exploration and sampling of the site and
additional laboratory testing, which would cost more money and take more time. To reduce the level of
uncertainty, the report should only be used by the referenced client for the referenced project and the
construction described in the report unless authorized in writing by CG. CG should be consulted to
review changes to the proposed construction such as the nature, size, configuration, orientation, location
or weight of proposed improvements. Additionally, the practice of geotechnical engineering is
continually developing knowledge and experience, and it must be understood that recommendations are
based on the state of the practice at the location and time the report was prepared. The report should not
be used more than three years after issuance unless reviewed and revised if needed by CG.
The geotechnical engineering practice in the Colorado Front Range area uses a relative classification to
evaluate the expansive potential of soils and bedrock. The expansive potential is categorized as low,
medium, high or very high based on the swell potential. The following table presents the relative
classifications.
Table No.1 - Risk Categories
Slab Performance Risk
Category
Representative Percent Swell
(500 psf Surcharge)
Representative Percent Swell
(1000 psf Surcharge)
Low
0 to< 3
0 to< 2
Moderate
3 to < 5
2 to < 4
High
5to<8
4to<6
Very High
1 8 or greater
I or greater
Source: Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers, "Guideline for Slab PerformanceRisk
Evaluation and Residential Basement Floor System Recommendations (Denver Metropolitan. rea),
December 1996
Wheat Ridge
Building Division
The slab performance generally associated with the slab performance risk categories are as follows:
Appendix A
Important Information about this Report
Page 2
Low
slab cracking, differential movement and heave
Moderate
slab cracking, differential movement and heave, partial framing void and furnace
plenum closure
High to Very High
large slab cracking, differential movement and heave, closed framing void and
furnace plenum
Note: More or less damage can occur in any risk category due to the variable nature of soil and bedrock.
It is important to note that measured swell or expansion is not the only criteria used in developing
foundation and floor recommendations. Other factors considered in the development of foundation and
floor recommendations are:
a. Soil and bedrock variability,
b. Stratigraphy,
c. Groundwater depth during field activities and potential groundwater depth after construction,
d. Surface water features and site drainage,
e. Post construction landscaping and irrigation conditions,
f. Construction details and proposed use, and
g. Local experience.
Landscaping of the site following construction and owner maintenance will greatly affect the
performance of structures on sites with expansive soil or bedrock. Typically, moisture contents of
subsurface soils and bedrock increase after construction due to surface irrigation and the cut off of
evaporation that occurs when a slab or building is constructed. Poor owner maintenance, such as ground
surfaces sloping towards foundations or slabs and irrigated landscaping adjacent to buildings, will
increase the potential for slab and foundation movement by increasing the potential for moisture content
changes in the subsurface soils. The property owner or buyer, and anyone he or she plans to sell the
house to, must understand the risks associated with construction in areas with expansive soils and must
assume the responsibility for maintenance of the structure and the site. The owner and prospective
purchasers should review "A Guide to Swelling Soils for Colorado Homebuyers and Homeowners," a
special publication (SP43) of the Colorado Geological Survey, which helps homebuyers and homeowner
understand and take measures to reduce the potential for damage due to expansive soils.
City or
Wheat Ridge
ii"Cling Bivisi"
TRENCH SHOULD NOT BE DUG
BELOW AN IMAGINARY PLANE
EXTENDING FROM THE BOTTOM
OF THE FOOTING AT A 45° ANGLE
FRAMED WALL
GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT
REINFORCING STEEL
NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT,
FRAMING AND STEEL
REINFORCING SHOULD
BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS
UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE REPORT FOR
MOISTURE -CONDITIONING AND
COMPACTION OR GRAVEL SUB -SLAB
DRAIN RECOMMENDATIONS)
BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT
(SEE REPORT FOR BASEMENT FLOOR RECOMMENDATIONS)
/x lti tif•l '*
ti• F '' •" A E OE E4C4VATIQbl
rrrrrr -
* TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES WIDE
r R. AND AT HIGH POINT '12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF
SLAB OR BOTTOM Of: GRADE BEAM IF
/// STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS USED. TRENCH
SHOULD SLOPE DOWNWARD 1/8 INCH OR
MORE PER FOOT FROM HIGH POINT TO A SUMP
PIT OR OUTFALL.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED
WITH RELATIVELY CL.EAN,GRAVEL WITH 100%
FROM THE VERTICAL PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH SIEVE, 10% OR LESS
PASSING THE NO. 4 SIEVE AND 3% OR LESS
PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD
>' BE COVERED WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC OR ROOFING FELT.
r x n
r
k ✓ ror r i -
PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER
AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE 4
OR FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE.
TRENCHES IN SILTY SANDS AND
NOT TO SCALE r
GRAVELS SHOULD BE LINED WITH
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.
v
Cushman Geoscience INTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - FOOTING FOUNDATION
City
Wheat I
81jildinq
Figure No. Ftca. Int.
FOUNDATION
WALL BACKFILL
(SEE
MINIMUM SLOPER
'
OF GROUND
SURFACE)
.y<
(SEE REPORT FOR
FOOTING DESIGN,
REINFORCING AND
CONSTRUCTION
RECOMMENDATIONS)
• •
. 4 <
TRENCH SHOULD NOT BE DUG
BELOW AN IMAGINARY PLANE
EXTENDING FROM THE BOTTOM
OF THE FOOTING AT A 45° ANGLE
FRAMED WALL
GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT
REINFORCING STEEL
NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT,
FRAMING AND STEEL
REINFORCING SHOULD
BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS
UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE REPORT FOR
MOISTURE -CONDITIONING AND
COMPACTION OR GRAVEL SUB -SLAB
DRAIN RECOMMENDATIONS)
BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT
(SEE REPORT FOR BASEMENT FLOOR RECOMMENDATIONS)
/x lti tif•l '*
ti• F '' •" A E OE E4C4VATIQbl
rrrrrr -
* TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES WIDE
r R. AND AT HIGH POINT '12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF
SLAB OR BOTTOM Of: GRADE BEAM IF
/// STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS USED. TRENCH
SHOULD SLOPE DOWNWARD 1/8 INCH OR
MORE PER FOOT FROM HIGH POINT TO A SUMP
PIT OR OUTFALL.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED
WITH RELATIVELY CL.EAN,GRAVEL WITH 100%
FROM THE VERTICAL PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH SIEVE, 10% OR LESS
PASSING THE NO. 4 SIEVE AND 3% OR LESS
PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD
>' BE COVERED WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC OR ROOFING FELT.
r x n
r
k ✓ ror r i -
PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER
AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE 4
OR FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE.
TRENCHES IN SILTY SANDS AND
NOT TO SCALE r
GRAVELS SHOULD BE LINED WITH
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.
v
Cushman Geoscience INTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - FOOTING FOUNDATION
City
Wheat I
81jildinq
Figure No. Ftca. Int.
FRAMED WALL
GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT
REINFORCING STEEL
NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT,
FRAMING AND STEEL
REINFORCING SHOULD
BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS
BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT
TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 `
INCHES WIDE AND AT HIGH POINT 12
INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB OR
BOTTOM OF GRADE BEAM IF
STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS USED.
TRENCH SHOULD SLOPE DOWNWARD
1/8 INCH OR MORE PER FOOT FROM
HIGH POINT TO A SUMP PIT OR
OUTFALL.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED
WITH RELATIVELY CLEAN,GRAVEL
WITH 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH
SIEVE, 10%ORLESS PASSING THE NO.
4 SIEVE AND 3% OR LESS PASSING
THE NO. 200 SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD
BE COVERED WITH NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OR ROOFING
FELT.
I I
PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH
DIAMETER AND CONSIST OF
PERFORATED SCHEDULE 40 OR
FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE.
UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE
REPORT FOR MOISTURE -
CONDITIONING AND
COMPACTION OR GRAVEL
SUB -SLAB DRAIN
RECOMMENDATIONS)
TRENCH SHOULD NOT BE DUG
BELOW AN IMAGINARY PLANE
EXTENDING FROM THE BOTTOM
OF THE FOOTING AT A 45° ANGLE
FROM THE VERTICAL.
NOT TO SCALE
City 4 f
Whe❑t R
Building D isia
Cushman Geoscience EXTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - FOOTING FOUNDATION Figure No. Fta. Ext. 11
L
C
.�ti fti f fti
EEO
�.tiftifyfti ,
y
(SEE REPORT FOR
PIER DESIGN,
I
REINFORCING AND
TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES WIDE AND AT
FRAMED WALL
GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT
REINFORCING STEEL
NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT,
FRAMING AND STEEL
REINFORCING SHOULD
BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS
UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE REPORT FOR
MOISTURE -CONDITIONING AND
COMPACTION OR GRAVEL SUB -SLAB
DRAIN RECOMMENDATIONS)
BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT
(SEE REPORT FOR BASEMENT FLOOR RECOMMENDATIONS)
SLAB -ON -GRADE
.�ti fti f fti
�.tiftifyfti ,
y
�1 fti
. f
TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES WIDE AND AT
HIGH POINT 12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB OR BOTTOM
OF GRADE BEAM IF STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS USED.
TRENCH SHOULD SLOPE DOWNWARD 1/8 INCH OR MORE
PER FOOT FROM HIGH POINT TO A SUMP PIT OR
OUTFALL.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED WITH RELATIVELY
CLEAN,GRAVEL WITH 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH
<:<
SIEVE, 10% ORLESS PASSING THE NO, 4 SIEVE AND 3%
OR LESS PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD
BE COVERED WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OR
ROOFING FELT.
;
PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER
AND CONSIST
OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE
40 OR FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE.
City of
Cushman Geoscience INTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - PIER FOUNDATION Fiqure No. Pier Int.
FRAMED WALL
PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER
GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT
AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE
- REINFORCING STEEL
FOUNDATION
'
WALL BACKFILL
(SEE
MINIMUM SLOPER
TRENCHES SHOULD BE LINED WITH 10 -MIL
NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT,
.
OF GROUND
(SEE REPORT FOR
FRAMING AND STEEL
SURFACE)
WATERPROOFING IS APPLIED.
REINFORCING SHOULD
t>
s yi, l
s>
BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS
r>
'c=:
ttc }<
^
RECOMMENDATIONS)
BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT
L
VOID FORM UNDER
(SEE REPORT FOR BASEMENT
GRADE BEAM (SEE
FLOOR RECOMMENDATIONS)
REPORT FOR
-----
RECOMMENDATIONS)
SLAB -ON -GRADE
'tir rtirtir
TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES
{
ti...tid.,. ;:;
-E-�_ V I�� I
WIDE AND AT HIGH POINT 12 INCHES
r r•r•r.r•
BELOW TOP OF SLAB OR BOTTOM
®
UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE
GRADE BEAM IF STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS
REPORT FOR MOISTURE -
USED. TRENCH SHOULD SLOPE
CONDITIONING AND
DOWNWARD 1/8 INCH OR MORE PER
`':
COMPACTION OR GRAVEL
FOOT FROM HIGH POINT TO A SUMP PIT
SUB -SLAB DRAIN
OR OUTFAI_L.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED
RECOMMENDATIONS)
WITH RELATIVELY CLEAN,GRAVEL WITH
100% PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH SIEVE,
10% ORLESS PASSING THE NO, 4 SIEVE
AND 3% OR LESS PASSING THE NO. 200
SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD BE COVERED
{`
, :y
=
WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
r
l
OR ROOFING FELT.
PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER
AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE
40 OR FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE.
^r
TRENCHES SHOULD BE LINED WITH 10 -MIL
PLASTIC SHEATING THAT IS MECHANICALLY
(SEE REPORT FOR
ATTACHED TO THE FOUNDATION WALL AFTER
PIER DESIGN,
WATERPROOFING IS APPLIED.
REIFORCING AND
CONSTRUCTION
SCALE
y NOT '
RECOMMENDATIONS)
}TO
1
Cushman Geoscience EXTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - PIER FOUNDATION
{
City o
r'
Wheat Ri e
buildina F ;t on
re No. Pier Ext.
City of
Wheat R.Jidge
Date: .Tune 6, 2019
Location: 3300 Ames Street
ATTENTION: BUILDING DIVISION
SINGLE LAWL Y/DUPLEX
BUILDING PERS jT,4PPLIC'ATIO.,?V REVIEW
I have reviewed the submitted application documents to construct a New Home - Single Family - Duplex
located at the above referenced address. Please note the comments checked below.
1. ✓ Drainage:
a. Drainage Letter & Plan required: —Yes ✓ No
b. Site drainage/grading plan have been reviewed and are: ✓ OK NOT O ;refer to
2_ ✓ Public Improvements required & to be completed with project: stipulations.
a. street paving/patching: ✓ Yes
b. curb & gutter: V Yes No
c. sidewalk -Yes -- NO Completed
V/ Yes
d. Other (specify):`Yes No r)
Complete
Completed
For items not constructed, the amount of funds taken in lieu of construction: $
3. . ✓.__ Does all existing roadway/alley R.O.W. meet the standards of the City: ✓ Yes
If not, what is required?
If R.O.W. is required, has the deed been received:
No
Yes ____ No (see Note below)
NOTE: All deeds must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
4. ✓ APPROVED: The Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and hereby approves
this Permit Application, subject to the stated requirements and/or attached stipulations.
Signature Date
A2/1_q__
5. N/A NOT APPROVED: The Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and does not
approve this Permit Application for the stated reason(s)'—
Signature David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Date
5. ✓ Stipulations: Direct roof drain downspouts to protect adjacent properties from stormwater runoff.
7. ✓ A Drainage Certification Letter accompanied by As -Built plans from the Engineer -of -Record shall be
required prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
8. 1I NOTE: ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTTS AS A RESULT OF PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED PER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PRIOR TO THE
ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
Rev 06103 3
City of
` h6atRge
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. Wheat Ridge, Co 80033-8001 P: 303,235.2861 F: 303.235.2857
NOTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RESTORATION
DATED: June 6, 2019 ADDRESS: 3300 Ames Street
Dear Contractor:
In conjunction with the approval of the building permit application for the above referenced
address, this letter is to inform you that all existing public improvements located along the
frontage of said address shall be restored, (if damaged from related construction) to an
acceptable condition, as determined by City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Department, and prior
to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Prior to any construction commencing, the City's representative will conduct an onsite
inspection to determine the existing condition(s) of the public improvements at this address.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864
Sincerely,
David F. Brossman, P.L.S.
Development Review Engineer
CC: File
Rev 2108
LCity of
w�iC�ae
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7540 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 86033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857
PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES
Date: June 69 2019
Location of Construction: 3300 Ames Street
Purpose of Construction:
Single Family ✓
New Home - Single Family - Duplex
Commercial
Developownt Review Processing Fee: ................................................ $100.00
(Required of all projects for document processing)
Multi -Family — __—
$ 100.00
Sinele Family ResidencelDunlex Review Fee:... .................................. $50.00 $ 50.00
Commercial/Muld-Famil- Review Fees:
(Fees include reviews of the In and 21 submittals)
• Review of existing or minimal technical documents: ........................
$200.00
$
• Initial review' of technical civil engineering documents:
5600.00
$
• Traffic Impact Study Review Fee : ............................................. .......
$600.00
$
• Trip Generation Study Review Fee: ................................ .................
$200.00
$
• Stormwater Management Plan (SW -MP) Review Fee: .......................
$200.00
$
• O & M Schedule Review & SMA Recording Fee .............................
$100.00
$
• Construction Control Plan.................................................................
$100.00
$
' Each Application will be reviewed by staff once and returned for changes_ If after review of the second submittal changes requested by staff
have not been fully made to the civillsttr mwater/trafrre dooumeats, further reviews will
be subject to the following Resubmittal Fees:
• Resubmittal Fees:
3rd submittal ('/x initial review fee): ....................................................
$300.00
g
4th submittal (full initial review fee)........ .......................................... $600.00 $
Allsubsequent submittals: ................................................................. $600.00 X = $
(Full initial review fee)
TOTAL REVIEW FEES (due at time of Building Permit issuance): :SFL1 SO.00
PLEASE NOTE THAT IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE FEES, THERE WILL BE LICENSING AND
PERMITTING FEES REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES WITHIN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
Rev 05119
Static Pressure and Friction Rate Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
Entire House� By. Dakota Groves
Ultimate Heating &Cooling � � � � 0
0 I
4971 Monaw St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Project Information
For: Feaster Realty
3300 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212
Available Static Pressure
Total Effective Length
Heating
Cooling
(in H2O)
(in H2O)
External static pressure
0.90
0.90
Pressure losses
42
26
Coil
0.21
0.21
Heat exchanger
0
0
Supply diffusers
0.02
0.02
Return grilles
0.03
0.03
Filter
0.10
0.10
Humidifier
0
0
Balancing damper
0
0
Other device
0
0
Available static pressure
0.54
0.54
Total Effective Length
Supply Ducts
Return Ducts
Friction Rate
Heating
(in/100ft)
0.061 OK
0.061 OK
Cooling
(in/100ft)
0.061 OK
0.061 OK
Fitting Equivalent LengthDetails
Supply 8A7=30, 4G=80, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 2A2=55, 12H1=20, 8E=10, 1 F1=120: TotalEL=375
Return 6G=30, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 6C6=115, 6CB=25, 6CA=10, 6CA=10, 8D1=80, 5N=55, 6CA=10: Total EL=395
wrilghtsoft,
H Comfort BulderbyWrigFdsoft18.0.32RSU27046
"MilkSt D�lexes\3300 Ames Sl (South Bldg Right).r p Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Ow oS
w %Gd,9 9P
14:33:21
Page 1
Supply
Return
(ft)
(ft)
Measured length of run -out
30
17
Measured length of trunk
42
26
Equivalent length of fittings
375
395
Total length
447
438
Total effective length
885
Supply Ducts
Return Ducts
Friction Rate
Heating
(in/100ft)
0.061 OK
0.061 OK
Cooling
(in/100ft)
0.061 OK
0.061 OK
Fitting Equivalent LengthDetails
Supply 8A7=30, 4G=80, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 2A2=55, 12H1=20, 8E=10, 1 F1=120: TotalEL=375
Return 6G=30, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 6C6=115, 6CB=25, 6CA=10, 6CA=10, 8D1=80, 5N=55, 6CA=10: Total EL=395
wrilghtsoft,
H Comfort BulderbyWrigFdsoft18.0.32RSU27046
"MilkSt D�lexes\3300 Ames Sl (South Bldg Right).r p Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Ow oS
w %Gd,9 9P
14:33:21
Page 1
Name
Trunk
Htg
Clg
Design
Veloc
Diam
H x W
Duct
Stud/Joist
Opening (in)
Name
Type
(cfm)
(cfm)
FR
(fpm)
(in)
(in)
Material
Trunk
st2A
PeakAVF
427
491
0.061
737
13.9
8 x 12
ShtMetl
st2
st2
PeakAVF
804
857
0.061
772
13.9
8 x 20
ShtMetl
168
st1
PeakAVF
431
378
0.071
646
10.8
8 x 12
ShtMetl
Ox 0
Name
Grille
Size (in)
Htg
(cfm)
Clg
(cfm)
TEL
(ft)
Design
FR
Veloc
(fpm)
Diam
(in)
H x W
(in)
Stud/Joist
Opening (in)
Duct
Mat]
Trunk
rb4
Ox 0
194
157
108.3
0.247
556
8.0
Ox 0
ShMt
rt1
rb6
Ox 0
212
122
282.5
0.095
609
8.0
Ox 0
ShMt
rt1
rb5
Ox 0
157
168
166.0
0.161
480
8.0
Ox 0
ShMt
rb7
Ox 0
171
232
437.8
0.061
666
8.0
Ox 0
ShMt
rt1
rb2
Ox 0
182
213
309.8
0.086
611
8.0
Ox 0
ShMt
rt1
rb1
Ox 0
161
184
231.3
0.116
527
8.0
Ox 0
ShMt
rt1
rb3
Ox 0
158
159
171.8
0.156
593
7.0
Ox 0
ShMt
rt1
Name
Trunk
Type
Htg
(cfm)
Clg
(cfm)
Design
FR
Veloc
(fpm)
Diam
(in)
H x W
(in)
Duct
Material
Trunk
rt1
PeakAVF
1078
1067
0.061
647
15.6
10 x 24
ShtMetl
. W r1E,, htsoft, 2019 -May -22 14:33:21
Comfort Bulder by W rightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 2
P1�✓4�i1 ...St DLrpIexes\3300 Ames St (Souh Bldg RigIR).r p Calc= MJ8 Frort Door faces: W
Duct System Summary
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022
Project Information
For: Feaster Realty
3300 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212
885 ft
Supply Branch Detail Table
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By: Dakota Groves
Cooling
Heating
External static pressure
0.90
in H2O
Pressure losses
0.36
in H2O
Available static pressure
0.54
in H2O
Supply/ return available pressure
0.273 / 0.267
in H2O
Lowest friction rate
0.061
in/100ft
Actual airflow
1235
cfi-n
Total effective length (TEL)
st1
Bed
885 ft
Supply Branch Detail Table
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By: Dakota Groves
Cooling
0.90
in H2O
0.36
in H2O
0.54
in H2O
0.273 / 0.267
in H2O
0.061
i n/100ft
1235
cfm
Name
Design
(Btuh)
Htg
(cfm)
Clg
(cfm)
Design
FR
Diam
(in)
H x W
(in)
Duct
Mat
Actual
Ln (ft)
Ftg.Egv
Ln (ft)
Trunk
Bath
h 628
30
16
0.079
5.0
0x0
ShMt
20.8
325.0
st1
Bed
c 1289
78
84
0.071
6.0
Ox 0
ShMt
38.8
345.0
st1
Bed 2
h 1918
93
69
0.065
7.0
Ox 0
ShMt
50.3
370.0
st2
Bed -A
c 1289
78
84
0.082
6.0
Ox 0
ShMt
28.0
305.0
SO
Dlring
h 2010
97
79
0.107
6.0
Ox 0
ShMt
19.3
235.0
st1
Diring-A
h 2010
97
79
0.094
6.0
Ox 0
ShMt
20.0
270.0
st1
Fut Bath
h 173
8
0
0.079
4.0
Ox 0
ShMt
35.3
310.0
st2A
Fut Room 1
h 1028
50
36
0.091
5.0
Ox 0
ShMt
18.3
280.0
SO
Fut Room 2
h 907
44
36
0.076
5.0
Ox 0
ShMt
47.0
310.0
st2A
Kitchen
c 1192
70
78
0.092
5.0
Ox 0
ShMt
21.0
275.0
st2
Living
c 1639
91
107
0.079
7.0
Ox 0
ShMt
49.0
295.0
St2A
Living -A
c 1639
91
107
0.093
7.0
Ox 0
ShMt
39.3
255.0
st2
Living -B
c 1639
91
107
0.088
6.0
Ox 0
ShMt
46.3
265.0
st2A
M Bath
h 1393
67
27
0.074
6.0
Ox 0
ShMt
64.8
305.0
st2
M Bed
c 1786
85
116
0.061
7.0
Ox 0
ShMt
71.8
375.0
st2A
M Bed -A
c 1786
85
116
0.069
7.0
Ox 0
ShMt
62.3
335.0
st2A
TC
h 462
22
9
0.063
4.0
Ox 0
ShMt
69.8
360.0
st2A
UrffBSmt
c 1322
56
86
0.091
6.0
Ox 0
ShMt
30.0
270.0
st2
City of
Wheat Ridge
111101110111119 DIM0117-
wrightsoft¢ 2019 -May -2214:33:21
Comfort Builder by Wrightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046
Page 1
✓Vri ...St Duplexes\3300 Ames St (South Bldg Right).rup Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W
BSMT
6-1
7"
7" I T
12x8
Fut Bath
c4"
7"�
F -HI Rae
4"
6"
8 " 7
8"
8n
7"
Utif Bsmt
Adj Bldg 6"
Stair 24x10 20x8
7,.
5" �
8"
8"
8"
5" -1111
5"
6'
6" 12x8
6"
6"
Job #: 3300 Ames St.
Performed by Dakota Groves for:
Feaster Realty
3300Ames Street
W heatridge, CO 80212
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St.
Commerce City, CO 80022
Scale:1 :75
Page 3
Comfort Builder by W rightsoft
18.0.32 RSU27046
2019 -May -22 14:33:31
0Ames R (Souk Bldg Rght).W
Entry Level
7„ 711
wl-'
I
iitche l
611
7"
EE
7"
711-114
6" —*
Job #: 3300 Ames St.
Performed by Dakota Groves for:
Feaster Realty
3300Ames Street
W heatridge, CO 80212
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St.
Commerce City, CO 80022
l
OV, u is
�rQOl��d� ayot�
Scale:1 :75
Page 2
Comfort Builder by W rightsoft
18.0.32 RSU27046
2019-May2214:33:31
...OAmes a (South Bldg Rght).rup
N
Second Story
r
71' 7"
M Bed 7TC
471
811
M Bath
Laundry
M CIO
Adj Bldg
Stair 2
Hall Bed 2 7t1—A
8"
8"
Bed
Bath 1
611 611
1
Job #: 3300 Ames St. Ultimate Heating & Cooling Scale: 1 : 75
Performed by Dakota Groves for: Page 1
Feaster Realty 4971 Monaco St. Comfort Builder by W thtsoft
3300AmesStreet Commerce City, CO 80022 18.0.32 RSU27046
W heatridge, CO 80212 2019 -May 22 14:33:31
...OAmes a (Sour Bldg Rght).rup
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
1
Room name
Stair2
Hall
2
Exposed wall
O ft
O ft
3
Room height
10.0 It heat/cool
10.0 it heat/cool
4
Room dimensions
4.0 x 12.3 ft
1.0 x 117.8 ft
5
Room area
49.0 T
117.8 it'
Ty
Construction
Ll -value
Or
HTM
Area
Area(ft) )
Load
number
(Btuh/ft'-°F)
(Btuh/ft')
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
orperimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
HTt7
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basementwall, light
0.065
a
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, vd ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
Door, wd sctype
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
s
1.20
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
2336
1525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 qlazinq, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementwall, light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
Door, wd sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
Attic calling, aspha
0-021
1.50
0.97
49
49
74
47
118
118
177
114
F
Below grade floor,)
0.007
0.54
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
c) AED excursion
-9
-22
Envelope loss/gain
74
38
177
92
12
a) Infiltration
0
0
0
0
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants @ 230
0
0
0
0
Applianceslother
0
0
Subtotal (lines 6 to 13)
74
38
177
92
Less external load
0
0
0
0
Less transfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
-74
-38
-177
-92
14
Subtotal
0
0
15
Duct loads
-0%
0%
0
0
-0%
0%
Jy 0
0
Total room load
00
0
Air required (dm)
)
0
0
�P•
0
rACCA to meet all requirements
Ed.
PA `ti'e
i'� 2019 -May -2214:33:20
Comfort B Dlder bAZZ,Ky Wrigtdsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 11
St Duplexes\3300 Ames St (South Bldg RigM).np Calc = MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By: Dakota Groves
1
Room name
MCIo
Laundry
2
Exposed wall
O ft
O ft
3
Room height
10.0 ft heat/000l
10.0 ft heaV000l
4
Room dimensions
5.5 x 10.3 It
4.0 x 6.8 ft
5
Room area
56.4 fV
27.0 ft
Ty
Construction
U -value
Or
HTM
Area (ft)
Load
Area (ft)
Load
number
(Btuh/Fe--°F)
(Btuh/ft)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
a
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, vd ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, wd sctype
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementvall, light
0.065
s
1.20
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L�--G
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LG
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, M ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2glazinq,droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementwall,light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, M ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t2
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, M sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
Atfic ceiling, aspha
0.021
1.50
0.97
56
56
85
55
27
27
41
26
F
Belowgrade floor, 1
0.007
0.54
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
c) AED excursion
-11
-102
Envelope lossigain
85
44
41
-76
12
a) Infiltration
0
0
0
0
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants@ 230
0
00
0
Applianoes/other
0
500
Subtotal (lines 6 to 13)
85
44
41
424
Less edemalload
0
0
0
0
Lesstransfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
-85
-44
-41
-424
14
Subtotal
0
0
0
0
15
Dudloads
-0%
0%
0
0
-0%
0%
0
0
ITTotal
room load
0
0
0
0
Air required (dm)
0
0
0
0
Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
�r wrigtstffiaft 2019 -May -2214:33:20
ComfortBulder by W rightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27D46 Page 10
StDiplexes\3300Ames St (South Bldg Right).np Calc =MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By: Dakota Groves
1
Room name
TC
M Bed
2
Exposed wall
4.3 ft
25.3 ft
3
Room height
10.0 ft heat/cool
10.0 ft heat/cool
4
Room dimensions
6.5 x 4.3 It
1.0 x 227.9 ft
5
Room area
2Z6 fF
227.9 fl?
Ty
Construction
Ll -value
Or
HTM
Area (ftp)
Load
Area (ft=)
Load
number
(Btuh/F--°F)
(BtuhtW)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
a
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
198
139
604
154
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
5
0
117
172
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
54
0
1261
1860
11
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
Door, wd sctype
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementwall, light
0.065
s
1.20
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
[-:::
2 glazing, droutr,
0 320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-f
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15:25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
43
39
168
43
55
55
240
61
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
4
2
93
53
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazinq, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
BasemenNoll, light
0.065
w
1.78
0:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�G
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
Door, wd sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
Aftic ceiling, aspha
0.021
1.50
0.97
28
28
41
27'
228
228
342
221
F
Belowgrade floor, 1
0.007
0.54
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
c) AED excursion
-2
89
Envelopeloss/gain
303
121
2565
2557
12
a) Infiltration
147
17
872
101
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants @ 2300
0
2
460
Appliances/other
0
0
Subtotal (lines 6 to 13)
450
138
3437
3118
Less external load
0
0
0
0
Lesstransfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
12
6
100
455
14
Subtotal
462
145
3537
3573
15
Ductloads
-0°%
0%
0
0
-0%
0%
0
0
Total room load
462
145
X53
f 3573
Air required (dm)
22
9
171
232
wheat Ridge
Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. S„i, - -1�
wr°� htiCa�aerfit'�°`
y-2'1
Comfort Bo2019-Ma4:33:20
AZZ*Builder by W rig 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 9
StDuplexes\3300Ames St(South Bldg Riglt).ryp Calc =MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entine House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
1
Room name
Bed 2
M Bath
2
Exposed wall
13.0 ft
12.8 It
3
Room height
10.0 It heaUcool
10.0 It heat/cool
4
Room dimensions
1.0 x 143.6 It
6.5 x 12.8 it
5
Room area
143.6 fP
82.9 ft
Ty
Construdion
Ll -value
Or
HTM
Area (ftp)
Load
Area (ft)
Load
number
(Btuh/e-°F)
(Btu /V)
or perimeter (ft)
(Bbh)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
a
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, vd sc type
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basemerrtwall, light
0.065
s
1.20
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr out,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, cud ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
130
100
436
111
128
116
504
128
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
6
6
140
62
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
6
3
140
80
2glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazinq, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
30
7
701
469
0
0
0
0
W
Basernentvall,light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Frame wall, M ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, vd sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
Abicceiling, alpha
0.021
1.50
0.97
144
144
216
139
83
83
124
80
F
Below grade floor, l
0.007
0.54
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
c) AED excursion
-31-3
Envelope loss/gain
1353
716
909
348
12
a) Infiltration
449
52
441
51
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants@ 230
1
230
0
0
Appliances/other
0
0
Subtotal (lines 6to 13)
1802
998
1349
399
Less extemalload
0
0
0
0
Less transfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
116
60
44
23
14
Subtotal
1918
1058
1393
422
15
Dudloads
-0%
0%
0
0
-0%
0%
0
0
Total room load
1918
1058
1393
422
Air required (dm)
93
69
671
27
Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
��.F wrlgl�tWCWM 2019 -May -2214:33:20
" Comfort Builder by WrigIIsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 8
St Dtplexes\3300 Ames St (South Bldg Right).rup Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By: Dakota Groves
1
Room name
Bath 1
Bed
2
Exposed wall
5.8 It
27.3 ft
3
Room height
10.0 ft heat/000l
10.0 ft heat/cool
4
Room dimensions
5.8 x 9.3 It
1.0 x 177.5 ft
5
Room area
53.2 ft 177.5
ft
Ty
Construction
U -value
Or
HTM
Area (fl)
Load
Area Or)
Load
number
(Btuh/(t2-°F)
(BtuhV)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
NiP/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basementwall, light
0.065
e
1 78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
0
W
Frame wall, M ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 1
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, M sctype
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementwall,light
0.065
s
1.20
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, droutr,
0,320
s
23.36
15.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-G
I -G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, M ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
133
133
578
147
G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazinq, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
Basementwall, light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
58
55
240
61
140
98
428
109
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
3
0
58
86
0
0
0
0
G
[��G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
42
0
981
1447
D
Door, M sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
Atticceiling, aspha
0.021
1.50
0.97
53
53
80
52
178
178
267
172
F
Belowgrade floor, 1
0.007
0.54
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
c) AED excursion
2
336
Envelope loss/gain
378
201
2253
2210
12
a) Infiltration
199
23
942
109
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants@ 2300
0
1
230
Appliances/other
0
0
Subtotal (lines 6 to 13)
577
224
3195
2550
Less external load
0
0
0
0
Less transfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
51
27
53
27
14
Subtotal
628
251
City 8J48
2577
15
Dud loads
-0%
0%
0
0
-0%
0%
0
0
Total room load
628
251
Qt eij3 48
5771
2168
Air required (dm)
30
16
b
9IG
�.rea/n
®n
Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
Comfort BtDlderby Wrigh[soft18.0.32RSU27046 2019-May-2214:33:20Pagel
St Duplexes\3300 Ames St (South Bldg Right).rupp Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
1
Room name
Kitchen
Stair 1
2
Exposed wall
18.5 ft
O ft
3
Room height
10.0 ft heatl000l
10.0 ft heat/cool
4
Room dimensions
1.0 x 295.3 ft
4.3 x 15.3 It
5
Room area
295.3 ft 64.8
fF
Ty
Construction
U -value
Or
HTM
Area (ft2)
Load
Area (ft)
Load
number
(Btuh/ft2--°F)
(Bluh/ft')
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basementwall,light
0.065
a
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, tid ext,
0.060
a
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, M sctype
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementwall, light
0.065
s
120
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L -G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
185
185
807
206
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr oub',
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazinq, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, M ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t2
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, M sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
Atficceiling,aspha
0.021
1.50
0.97
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
Belowgrade floor, 1
0.007
0.54
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
c) AED excursion
-28810
Envelope loss/gain
807
-82
0
0
12
a) Infiltration
639
74
0
0
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains. Occupants@ 230
0
0
0
0
Applianoes/other
1200
0
Subtotal (lines 6 to 13)
1446
1192
0
0
Less edemal load
0
0
0
0
Less transfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
0
0
0
0
14
Subtotal
1446
1192
0
0
15
Dudloads
-0%
0%1
01
0
-0%
0%1
0
0
Total room load
1446
11920
0
Air required (dm)
70
78
0
0
Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
- wrlghi�xofit 2019 -May -2214:33:20
Comfort Builder by W rig h tsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 6
St Duplexes\3300 Ames Sl (South Bldg Rignt).rup Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
1
Room name
Living
Dining
2
Exposed wall
38.3 ft
31.5 ft
3
Room height
10.0 It heat/cool
10.0 ft heat/000l
4
Room dimensions
19.8 x 18.5 ft
1.0 x 203.4 ft
5
Room area
365.4 ft'
203.4 IF
Ty
Construction
U -value
Or
HTM
Area (ft)
Load
Area (ft2)
Load
number
(Btuh&-°F)
(Btuh/ff)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
He.t7
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
a
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
198
78
338
86
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
96
0
2243
3306
0
0
0
0
D
Door, wd sc type
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
24
24
561
181
0
0
0
0
W
Basemerttwalt, light
0.065
s
1.20
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Et2
gla2ing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
185
165
720
183
118
102
443
113
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, or outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
20
11
467
267
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
16
9
374
214
2glazinq,droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementwall, light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
198
132
574
146
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
42
0
981
1447
D
Door, wd sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
24
24
561
181
C
Attic ceiling, aspha
0.021
1.50
0.57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
0
F
Below grade floor, l
0.007
0.54
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
c) AED excursion
-161
193
Envelope losstgain
4328
3864
2932
2293
12
a) Infiltration
1322
153
1088
126
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants@ 2300
0
0
0
Appliances/other
900
0
Subtotal (lines 6to 13)
5650
4917
4021
2420
Less extemalload
0
0
0
0
Lesstransfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
0
0
0
0
14
Subtotal
5650
4917
4021
2420
15
Dudloads
-0%
0%1
0
0
-0%
0%
0
0
Total room load
5650
4917
4021
2420
Air required (clm)
2731
320
= 194
ri 157
3
tQ
Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. A
wril�tl stso<Y"
Comfort Bolder by W rightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 019-Wy-22 14:33:20Page 5
StDiplexes\3300 Ames St(South Bldg Rght).np Calc =MJB Front Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating 8r. Cooling
4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
1
Room name
Stair B
PMr
2
Eposed wall
O ft
O ft
3
Room height
9.0 It heat/000l
10.0 ft heat/cool
4
Room dimensions
4.0 x 14.3 ft
4.3 x 8.0 ft
5
Room area
57.0 IF
34.0 fF
Ty
Construction
LI -value
Or
HTM
Area (ft)
Load
Area (ft=)
Load
number
(Btuh/ft-°F)
(Btuh/ft')
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
or perimeter (ft)
(BWh)
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
NIP/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
a
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, vd ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
G
2glazing, droutr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, M sc type
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementwall,light
0.065
s
1.20
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glaang, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, vd ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazinq, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame well, wd ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t2
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, vd sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
Afficoeiling,aspha
0.021
1.50
0.97
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
Below grade floor,)
0.007
0.54
0.00
57
57
31
0
0
0
0
0
6
c) AED excursion
0
0
Envelope loss/gain
31
0
0
0
12
a) Infiltration
0
0
0
0
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants@ 230
0
0
0
0
Applianoes/other
0
0
Subtotal (lines 6 to 13)
31
0
0
0
Less extemalload
0
0
0
0
Less transfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
-31
0
0
0
14
Subtotal
0
0
0
0
15
Dudloads
-0%
0%
0
0
-0%10%
0
0
Total room load
00
0
0
Air required (clm)
0
0
0
0
Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
TT Wrl tsisolwt' 2019 -May -22143320
Mn,,.._.. «w,
ComfortBolder by W rigttsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 4
..St Diplexes\3300 Ames St (South Bldg Rigft).rup Calc= MJ8 Frort Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By: Dakota Groves
1
Room name
Fut Room 2
Unf Bsmt
2
Exposed wall
27.3 ft
19.0 ft
3
Room height
9.0 ft heaUcool
9.0 ft heat/cool
4
Room dimensions
11.8 x 15.5 ft
1.0 x 360.3 It
5
Room area
182.1 ft'
360.3 ft2
Ty
Construction
Ll -value
Or
HTM
(ft)
Area(ftp)
Load
Area
Load
number
(Btuh/fV-°F)
(Btuh/fF)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
e
1.78
0:00
106
106
189
0
0
0
0
0.
W
Frame wall, M ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
Door, wd sctype
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
iiW _
Basementwall,light
0.065
s
1.2{3
0.00
140
120
154
0'
171
139
153
0
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0'
32
9
748
488
2 glazing, dr outr,
0:320
s
23.36
1525
20
5
467
305
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, vA ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2glazinq,droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, vtd ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr out,,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�G
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
Door, vai sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
Attic ceiling, aspha
0.021
1.50`
0.97
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
Belowgradefioor,1
0.007
0.54
0.00
182
182
98
0
360
360
194
0
6
c) AED excursion
23
-66
Envelope loss/gain
907
328
1094
422
12
a) Infiltration
0
0
0
0
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants @ 230
0
0
0
0
Applianceslother
230
900
Subtotal (lines 6to13)
907
558
1094
1322
Less extemalload
0
0
0
0
Less transfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
00
72
0
14
Subtotal
907
558
1166
1322
15
Ductloads
-0%
0%
0
0
-0%
0%
t%' 0
Total room load
907
5581122
Air required (dm)
44
36
V':61
R'sd9 86
Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
Building Division
AQZ�.e!�?!! 2019 -May -22 14:33:20
AZZKComfort Bolder by Wrightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 3
St DLrplexes\3300 Ames St (South Bldg Rignt).rrp Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
1
Room name
Mech
Fut Room 1
2
Exposed wall
8.0 It
26.0 ft
3
Room height
9.0 It heat/cool
9.0 ft heat/cool
4
Room dimensions
8.0 x 14.3 ft
11.8 x 14.3 ft
5
Room area
114.0 ft'
167A ft2
Ty
Constudion
Ll -value
Or
HTM
Area (IF)
Load
Area (ft)
Load
number
(Btuh/t-T)
(Btuh/ft�)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btih)
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basementwall, light
0.065
a
1.78
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Door, wd sctype
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementwdll,light
OA65
S
1.20
0.00
0
0
0
0
128
108
133
0
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr out',
0.320
s
23.36
1525
0
0
0
0
20
5
467
305
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 glazinq, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Basementvall,light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00
72
72
128
0
406
106
189
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
[�2
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dow, wd sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
Aticceiling,aspha
0.021
1.50
0.97
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
Belowgrade floor, 1
0.007
0.54
0.00
114
114
61
0
167
167
90
0
6
c) AED excursion
0
23
Envelope loss/gain
190
0
879
328
12
a) Infiltration
0
0
0
0
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants@ 230
0
0
0
0
Appliances/other
0
230
Subtotal (lines 6 to 13)
190
0
879
558
Less external load
0
0
0
0
Lesstransfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
-190
0
148
0
14
Subtotal
0
0
1028
558
15
Ductloads
-0%
0°%
0
0
-0%
0°%
0
0
Total room load0
0
1028
558
Air required (dm)
0
0
50
36
Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
-fiJa- 2019 -May -2214:33:20
Comfort Bulder by W rigFtsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 2
St Drplexes\3300 Ames St (South Bldg Right).rua Calc= MA Front Door faces: W
Right -J® Worksheet
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
1
Room name
Entire House
Fut Bath
2
Exposed wall
264.8 It
8.0 It
3
Room height
9.7 ft d
9.0 ft heat/000l
4
Room dimensions
8.0 x 10.3 ft
5
Room area
2888.4 T
82.0 ft'
Ty
Construdion
Ll -value
Or
HTM
Area (IV)
Load
Area (ft2)
Load
number
(Btuh/fF--°F)
(Btuh/ft-)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
or perimeter (ft)
(Btuh)
Heat
Cool
Gross
NIP/S
Heat
Cool
Gross
N/P/S
Heat
Cool
6
W
Basementwall,light
0.065
a
1.78
0.00
178
178
317
0
72
72
128
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
e
4.36
1.11
395
216
942
240
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
5
0
117
172
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr out-,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
54
0
1261
1860
0
0
0
0
11G
2 glazing, dr out-,
0.320
e
23.36
34.44
96
0
2243
3306
0
0
0
0
D
Door, wd sctype
0.320
e
23.36
7.55
24
24
561
181
0
0
0
0
W
Basement wall, light
0.065
s
1.20
000
439
367
439
0
0
0
0
0
[:::G
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
1525
32
18
748
488
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outir,
0.320
s
23.36
15.25
40
22
934
610
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
s
4.36
1.11
975
893
3896
993
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
10.30
6
12
140
62
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, droutr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
4
4
93
53
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
6
7
140
80
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
20
22
467
267
0
0
0
0
G
2 glazing, dr out-,
0.320
s
23.36
13.37
16
18
374
214
0
0
0
0
G
2 qlazinq, dr out-,
0.320
s
23.36
15.62
30
13
701
469
0
0
0
0
W
Basementwail,light
0.065
w
1.78
0.00
178
178
317
0
0
0
0
0
W
Frame wall, wd ext,
0.060
w
4.36
1.11
395
285
1241
316
0
0
0
0
2 glazing, dr out-,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
3
0
58
86
0
0
0
0
�G
G
2 glazing, dr outr,
0.320
w
23.36
34.44
84
0
1962
2893
0
0
0
0
D
Door, wd sctype
0.320
w
23.36
7.55
24
24
561
181
0
0
0
0
C
Aiticceiling, aspha
0,021
1.50
0.97
963
963
1446
933
0
0
0
0
F
Belowgrade floor, 1
0.007
0.54
0.00
963
963
519
0
82
82
44
0
6
c) AED excursion
0
0
Envelope loss/gain
19478
13406
173
0
12
a) Infiltration
6099
707
0
0
b) Room ventilation
0
0
0
0
13
Internal gains: Occupants @ 230
4
920
0
0
Appliances/other
3960
0
Subtotal (lines 6 to 13)
25577
18993
173
0
Less edema/ load
0
0
0
0
Less transfer
0
0
0
0
Redistribution
0
0
0
0
14
Subtotal
25577
18993
173
0
15
Dudloads
0%
0%
0
0
-0%
0%
0
0
Total room load
25577
18993
173
0
Air required (dm)
1235
1235
wh
0
f
".Y9
Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. Building Divisor)
Tt =ham 2019 -May -22 14:33:20
Comfort B alder by Wrightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1
St DLplexes\3300 Ames St (South Bldg Right).rup Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W
Project Summary
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022
For: Feaster Realty
3300 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
Notes: Modeled to comply with 2012 IECC.
Heat loss assumed RH 30% at 70"f.
Ventilation modeled compliance with ASHRAE 62.2-2010.
Design Information
Weather: Denver Stapleton Intl AP, CO, US
Winter Design Conditions Summer Design Conditions
Outside db -3 °F Outside db
91
°F
Inside db 70 °F Inside db
75
°F
Design TD 73 °F Design TD
16
°F
Daily range
H
Heating output
Relative humidity
50
%
Moisture difference
-34
gr/Ib
Heating Summary
Structure 25577 Btuh
Ducts 0 Btuh
Central vent (59 cfm) 3893 Btuh
Outside air
Humidification
Piping
Equipment load
Infiltration
Method
Construction quality
Fireplaces
3696 Btuh
0 Btuh
33165 Btuh
Simplified
Semi -ti ht
1 (Tight)
Heating Cooling
Area (ft) 2888 2888
Volume (ft) 19769 19769
Air changes/hour 0.28 0.15
Equiv AVF (cfm) 92 49
Heating Equipment Summary
Make Carrier
Trade Carrier Comfort 92 Single -Stag...
Model 59SC2C060S17-16
AHRI ref
Sensible Cooling Equipment Load Sizing
Structure
18993
Btuh
Ducts
0
Btuh
Central vent (59 cfm)
842
Btuh
Outside air
Sensible cooling
Heating output
Blower
1707
Btuh
Use manufacturer's data y
Rate/swingg multipplier 1.00
Equipmentsensibleload 21542 Btuh
Latent Cooling Equipment Load Sizing
Structure -127 Btuh
Ducts 0 Btuh
Central vent (59 cfm) -1105 Btuh
Outside air
Equipment latent load 0 Btuh
Equipment Total Load (Sen+Lat) 21542 Btuh
Req. total capacity at 1.00 SHR 1.8 ton
Cooling Equipment Summary
Make Carrier
Trade CARRIER
Cond 24ABB330ABN3
Coil CNPVP3717ALA
11.0 EER, 13 SEER
24840
Btuh
0
AHRI ref
Efficiency
92.1 AFUE
Efficiency
Heating input
60000
Btuh
Sensible cooling
Heating output
49680
Btuh
Latent cooling
Temperature rise
44
°F
Total cooling
Actual airflow
1235
cfm
Actual airflow
Air flow factor
0.048
cf-nBtuh
Air flow factor
Static pressure
0.90
in H2O
Static pressure
Space thermostat
Load sensible heat ratio
11.0 EER, 13 SEER
24840
Btuh
0
Btuh
24840
Btuh
1235
cfm
0.065
cfm/Btuh
0.90
in H2O
1.00
Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
AW wr➢gFftSoft- 2019 -May -2214:33:20
ComfortBulder by WriglIsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1
St Diplexest3300 Ames St (Souh Bldg Rigk).rLp Calc= MJ8 Frort Door faces: W
2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, s
k dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated
(SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (1 ft window ht, 1.5 ft w
sep.); 7 ft head ht
all
2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, s
dr outr, air gas, wd fan mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated
(SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (5 ft window ht, 1.5 ft
sep.); 7 ft head ht
Doors
6 0.320
0
23.4
140
10.3
62
3 0.320
0
23.4
58
34.4
86
9 0.320
0
23.4
199
17.4
148
30 0.320
0
23.4
701
15.6
469
Door, wd sc type e 24 0.320
w 24 0.320
all 48 0.320
Ceilings
Attic ceiling, asphalt shingles roof mat, r-49 ceil ins, 1/2" gypsum board int 963 0.021
fnsh
Floors
Below grade floor, light dry soil, 9' depth 963 0.007
` wrightsoft. Comfort Biilder by W rigriwft 18.0.32 RSU27046
...StDLplexes\3300Ames St(SodhBldg Riglt).rLp Calc =MJ8 Frort Door faces: W
0
23.4
561
7.55
181
0
23.4
561
7.55
181
0
23.4
1121
7.55
362
49.0
1.50
1446
0.97
933
0
0.54
519
0
0
04 of
'41X'Ook R�d90
14:33:20
Page 2
Component Constructions Job: 3300 Ames St
F' Date: 05/22/2019
Entire House By: Dakota Groves
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022
For: Feaster Realty
3300 Ames Street, W heatridge, CO 80212
Location:
Denver Stapleton Intl AP, CO, US
Elevation: 5285 ft
Latitude: 40 ° N
Outdoor. Heating
Dry bulb (°F) -3
Daily range (°F) -
Wet bulb (°F) -
Wind speed (mph) 20.0
Indoor.
Heating Cooling
70
Indoor temperature (°F)
73
Design TD (°F)
30
Relative humidity (%)
Cooling
Moisture difference (grAb)
91
Infiltration:
27 (H )
Method
60
Construction quality
7.5
Fireplaces
Heating Cooling
70
75
73
16
30
50
35.2
-33.5
Simplified
Semi -tight
1 (Tight)
Construction descriptions
Or
Area
U -value
Insul R
Htg HTM
Loss CIg HTM
Gain
0.320
0
ft'
BtuWWF
ft''FBluh
Btuhlft'
Bluh
BtuWft'
Btuh
Walls
140
13.4
80
20
0.320
0
23.4
467
Basement wall, light dry soil, 2'x6" wood int frm, concrete wall, r-19 cav ins,
e
178
0.024
19.0
1.78
317
0
0
8" thk, 5/8" gypsum board int fnsh
s
367
0.024
19.0
1.20
439
0
0
0
W
178
0.024
19.0
1.78
317
0
0
1962
all
722
0.024
19.0
1.49
1073
0
0
Frame Wall, wd ext, 3/8" wood shth, r-20 cav ins, 1/2" gypsum board int
a
216
0.060
20.0
4.36
942
1.11
240
fnsh, 2'x6" wood frm, 16" o.c. stud
s
893
0.060
20.0
4.36
3896
1.11
993
23.4
W
285
0.060
20.0
4.36
1241
1.11
316
15.2
all
1394
0.060
20.0
4.36
6080
1.11
1549
Partitions
(none)
Windows
2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, e
dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated s
(SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (2 ft window ht, 1.5 ft s
sep.); 7 ft head ht
s
s
all
2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, e
dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated
(SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (6 ft window ht, 1.5 ft W
sep.); 7 ft head ht all
2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, e
dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated
(SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (8 ft window ht, 1.5 ft
sep.); 7 ft head ht
2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, s
dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated
(SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (4 ft window ht, 1.5 ft s
sep.); 7 ft head ht
all
5
0.320
0
23.4
117
34.4
172
4
0.320
0
23.4
93
13.4
53
6
0.320
0
23.4
140
13.4
80
20
0.320
0
23.4
467
13.4
267
16
0.320
0
23.4
374
13.4
214
51
0.320
0
23.4
1191
15.4
787
54
0.320
0
23.4
1261
34.4
1860
84
0.320
0
23.4
1962
34.4
2893
138
0.320
0
23.4
3224
34.4
4753
96
0.320
0
23.4
2243
34.4
3306
32
0.320
0
23.4
748
15.2
488
40
0.320
0
23.4
934
15.2
610
72
0.320
0
23.4
1682
15.2
1098
t '*' wrightsoft.. 2019 -May -2214:33:20
ComfortBulder by Wrigrtsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1
St Dlplexes\3300 Ames St (Soup Bldg Rigrt).rlp Calc = MJ8 Frort Door faces: W
Building Analysis
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Project Information
For: Feaster Realty
3300 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
Heating
Component
Design
Conditions
% of load
Walls
Location:
7154
Indoor:
Heating
Cooling
Denver Stapleton Intl AP, CO, US
27.9
Indoor temperature (°F)
70
75
Elevation: 5285 ft
Ceilings
Design TD (°F)
73
16
Latitude: 40°N
0.5
Relative humidity (%)
30
50
Outdoor: Heating
Cooling
Moisture difference (gr/Ib)
35.2
-33.5
Dry bulb (°F) -3
91
Infiltration:
0
Daily range (°F) -
27 ( H
) Method
Simplified
11.1
Wet bulb (°F) -
60
Construction quality
Semi -tight
Adjustments
Wind speed (mph) 20.0
7.5
Fireplaces
1 (Tight)
1
Heating
Component
Btuh/ft2
Btuh
% of load
Walls
3.4
7154
21.6
Glazing
23.4
9239
27.9
Doors
23.4
1121
3.4
Ceilings
1.5
1446
4.4
Floors
0.5
519
1.6
Infiltration
3.5
6099
18.4
Ducts
0
0
Piping
0
0
Humidification
3696
11.1
Ventilation
3893
11.7
Adjustments
0
Total
1
33165
100.0
Cooling
Component
Btuh/ft2
Btuh
%of load
Walls
0.7
1549
7.2
Glazing
26.7
10561
49.0
Doors
7.6
362
1.7
Ceilings
1.0
933
4.3
Floors
0
0
0
Infiltration
0.4
707
3.3
Ducts
0
0
Ventilation
842
3.9
Internal gains
4880
22.7
Blower
1707
7.9
Adjustments
0
Total
1
1 215421
100.0
Latent Cooling Load = 0 Btuh
Overall U -value = 0.060 Btuh/ft2-°F
Data entries checked.
Glazing
Glazing
umidification
/entilation
nfiltration
:ion
nternal Gains
ration
mer '3
Oth
city of
Wheat Ridge
wrightsaft- 2019 -May -2214:33:20
,.r,. «- s >- Comfort B Dlder by W rigFRsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1
ACC�K ...St Duplexes\3300 Ames St (South Bldg Right).r-p Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W
M Bath
83
1393
422
67
27
TC
28
462
145
22
9
M Bed
228
3537
3573
171
232
M CIO
56
0
0
0
0
Laundry
27
0
0
0
0
Stair 2
49
0
0
0
0
Hall
118
0
0
0
0
Entire House d 2888 25577 18993 1235 1235
Other equip loads 7588 2549
Equip. @ 1.00 RSM 21542
Latent cooling 0
TOTALS ' 2888 ' 33165 ' 21542 ' 1235 ' 1235
Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
wrightsoft, 2019 -May -22 14:33:20
Comfort Bulder by W rigMsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 2
f CCK ...St DLpIexes13300 Ames St (SOUK Bldg Rigft).r p Calc = MJ8 Frort Door faces: W
Load Short Form
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022
Project Information
For: Feaster Realty
3300 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
ROOM NAME
Area
(ft2)
Design
Information
Htg AVF
(cfm)
Clg AVF
(cfm)
Fut Bath
Htg
Clg
Infiltration
8
0
Outside db (°F)
-3
91
Method
Simplified
0
Inside db (°F)
70
75
Construction quality
Semi -tight
Design TD (°F)
73
16
Fireplaces
558
1 (Tight)
Daily range
-
H
1166
1322
56
Inside humidity (%)
30
50
0
0
0
Moisture difference (grAb)
35
-34
0
0
0
HEATING EQUIPMENT
Living
COOLING EQUIPMENT
5650
Make Carrier
273
320
Make Carrier
203
4021
Trade Carrier Comfort 92 Single
-Stag...
157
Trade CARRIER
295
1446
Model 59SC2C060S17--16
70
78
Cond 24ABB330ABN3
65
0
AHRI ref
0
Cit' of 0
Coil CNPVP3717ALA
53
628
251
30
16
AHRI ref
178
3248
Efficiency
92.1 AFLIE
Wheat Ridge168
Efficiency 11.0 EER, 13
SEER
1010
Heating input
60000
Btuh
Sensible cooling
24840
Btuh
Heating output
49680
Btuh
Latent cooling
0
Btuh
Temperature rise
44
°F
Total cooling
24840
Btuh
Actual airflow
1235
cfm
Actual airflow
1235
cfm
Airflowfactor
0.048
cfm/Btuh
Air flow factor
0.065
cfm/Btuh
Static pressure
0.90
in H2O
Static pressure
0.90
in H2O
Space thermostat
Load sensible heat ratio
1.00
ROOM NAME
Area
(ft2)
Htg load
(Btuh)
Clg load
(Btuh)
Htg AVF
(cfm)
Clg AVF
(cfm)
Fut Bath
82
173
0
8
0
Mech
114
0
0
0
0
Fut Room 1
167
1028
558
50
36
Fut Room 2
182
907
558
44
36
Unf Bsmt
360
1166
1322
56
86
Stair B
57
0
0
0
0
Pwdr
34
0
0
0
0
Living
365
5650
4917
273
320
Dining
203
4021
2420
194
157
Kitchen
295
1446
1192
70
78
Stair 1
65
0
0
0
Cit' of 0
Bath 1
53
628
251
30
16
Bed
178
3248
2577
157
Wheat Ridge168
P-1 ')
1 sl A
1010
1 r1G4
nn
—
Building Division
Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
* wrig ,htsoft 2019 -May -2214:33:20
e,,,, ,�...„.„�;.;,,,w;,, Comfort Btnlder by Wrigttsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046
Page 1
...StDuplexes\3300Ames St(South Bldg Right).rup Calc =W8 Frort Door faces: W
Manual S Compliance Report
Entire House
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022
For: Feaster Realty
3300 Ames Street, W heatridge, CO 80212
Design Conditions
Outdoor design DB:
90.8°F
Sensible gain: 21542
Btuh
Outdoor design WB:
60.1 °F
Latent gain: 0
Btuh
Indoor design DB:
75.0°F
Total gain: 21542
Btuh
Indoor RH:
50%
Estimated airflow: 1235
cfm
Manufacturer's Performance Data
at Actual Design Conditions
Equipmenttype:
SplitAC
Manufacturer:
Carrier
Model: 24ABB330ABN3+CNPVP3717ALA
Actual airflow:
1235
cfm
Sensible capacity:
24840
Btuh
115% of load
Latent capacity:
0
Btuh
0% of load
Total capacity:
24840
Btuh
115% of load SHR: Ok%
Heating Equipment
Design Conditions
Outdoor design DB:
-3.0°F
Heat loss: 33165
Btuh
Indoor design DB:
70.0°F
Manufacturer's Performance Data at Actual Design Conditions
Equipment type: Gas furnace
Manufacturer: Carrier Model: 59SC2CO60S17-16
Actual airflow: 1235 cfm
Output capacity: 49680 Btuh 150% of load
Meets all requirements ofACCA Manual S.
Job: 3300 Ames St
Date: 05/22/2019
By. Dakota Groves
Entering coil DB: 77XF
Entering coil WB: 62.1°F
Entering coil DB: 66.5°F
Temp. rise: 51 °F
1 * wrightsoft, 2019 -May -2214:33:20
f��''', ComfortBiilder by W rigfisoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1
/� r�fR ...St D�plexest.3300 Ames St (SoLth Bldg Rigtt).rup Calc= MJ8 Frond Door faces: W
City of Wheat Ridge
Site Work Permit PERMIT - 201901154
PERMIT NO: 201901154 ISSUED: 06/14/2019
JOB ADDRESS: 3300 Ames St EXPIRES: 06/13/2020
JOB DESCRIPTION: Site work for the construction of two duplexes. All construction will be
done in one phase- total site is 0.43 acres. Construction to include a
private alley, utility laterals, landscaping, and water quality pond.
*** CONTACTS ***
OWNER FEASTER JAY
SUB (303)369-7977 TOMMY CAGLE 190113 Q BUILDERS, LLC
*** PARCEL INFO ***
ZONE CODE: UA / Unassigned USE: UA / Unassigned
SUBDIVISION CODE: 2412 / LAKESIDE, STEWART GARDENS, OLI BLOCK/LOT#: /
*** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 66,000.00
FEES
Total Valuation 0.00
Plan Review Fee 557.93
Use Tax 1,386.00
Permit Fee 858.35
Engin. Review Fee 1,700.00
** TOTAL ** 4,502.28
*** COMMENTS ***
*** CONDITIONS ***
All work shall comply 2012 International Codes, 2017 NEC (if applicable), and ordinances
adopted by the City of Wheat Ridge. Work is subject to field inspections.
No C.O. may be issued until public improvements are complete as identified in the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
'* * A *1 City of Wheat Ridge
„r r
Site Work Permit PERMIT - 201901154
PERMIT NO: 201901154 ISSUED: 06/14/2019
JOB ADDRESS: 3300 Ames St EXPIRES: 06/13/2020
JOB DESCRIPTION: Site work for the construction of two duplexes. All construction will be
done in one phase- total site is 0.43 acres. Construction to include a
private alley, utility laterals, landscaping, and water quality pond.
I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications,
applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized
by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with
this permit. I further attest that I am leg ally a zed to include alI entities named within this document as parties to the work to be
perform /� ll�work be perfo sclosed in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications.
Signature of OWNED --CONTRACTOR (Circle one) Date
1. This permit was issued based on the information provided in the permit application and accompanying plans and specifications and is
subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures.
2. This. permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and
received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building
Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the originalpermit fee.
3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard
requirements, fees androcedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of
the Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed.
4. No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a changeof the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval.
5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required
inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services
ce or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any provision of any
code or any ordinance or regulation of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to field inspection.
Signature of Chief Building Official Date
REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
city of
Com Date:
Plan/Permit #
Building & Inspection Services '� a/ � 011,5
7500 W. 29«' Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Plan Review Fee:�j o/
Office: 303-235-2855 * Fax: 303-237-8929 l� O Y
Inspection Line: 303-234-5933
Email: perm its(a�ci.wheatridge.co.us
Building Permit Application
*` Complete all applicable highlighted areas on both sides of this form.
Incomplete applications may not be processed. ***
Property Address: 3300 Ames St. Wheat Ridge, CO
Property Owner (please print): Jay Feaster Phone:
Property Owner Email: jay@feasterrealty.com
Tenant Name (Commercial Projects Only)
Property Owner Mailing Address: (if different than property address)
Address: 19510 W. 55th PI.
Citv, State, Zip: Golden, CO 80403
Arch itegVEnginee r: Michael Fiebig, AIA / Fiebig Architecture
Arch itecfi/Engineer E-mail: michael@fiebigarch.com phone: 303.594.7584
Contractor Name: Tommy Cagle / Q Builders LLC
City of Wheat Ridge License #: 190113
Contractor E-mail Address: gbuilders123@gmail.com
For Plan Review Questions & Comments (please print):
Phone: 303.369.7977
CONTACT NAME (please print): Jesse Donovan Phone:
CONTACT EMAIL(please print) jesse@brightlightereng.com
720.504.8629
Sub Contractors (Mist provide Wheat Ridge License No & Signed Subcontractor Authorization form):
Electrical: Plumbing: Mechanical:
W.R. City License # W.R. City License # W.R. City License #
Other City Licensed Sub: Other City Licensed Sub:
City License # City License #
Complete all highlighted fields.
❑COMMERCIAL [X RESIDENTIAL
Provide description of work: For ALL projects, provide a detailed description of work to be
performed, including current use of areas, proposed uses, square footage, existing condition and
proposed new condition, appliance size and efficiency, type and amount of materials to be used, etc.
Site development for the construction of two duplexes at 3300, 3308, 3316, and 3324 Ames
Street. All construction will be done in one phase - total site area is 0.43 acres, more or less.
Construction to include a private alley, utility laterals, landscaping, water quality pond, etc.
Sq. FULF
BTUs
Gallons
Amps Squares For Solar: KW # of Panels Requires Structural
For Commercial Projects Only: Occupancy Type: Construction Type:
Occupancy Load: Square Footage:
Project Value: (Contract value or the cost of all materials and labor included in the entire project)
$
OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT
I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or
regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown and allegations made are
accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance
with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application; that i am the legal owner
or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property to perform the described work and am also authorized by the legal owner of any
entity included on this application to list that e this application. I, the applicant for this building permit application, warrant the
truthfulness of the information provided o e appli tion.
CIRCLE ONE: (OWNER) (CON or AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE of OWNER (CONTRACTOR)
Signature (first and last name): DATE: 06/05/2019
Printed Mame: Jesse Dono n for Feaster Realty
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
ZONING COMMMENTS: Y
A AD
ev Qtz.eo (Dist -1 Ci
Reviewer; dQ..�
BUILDING DEP MEN T COMA -NTS:
Reviewer:
PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS:
Reviewer.
AWS &I Im
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
Building Division Valuation: _)
J
l
R ti
hCity of
PUBLIC WORKS
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857
PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES
Date: /O �)t YA/F
Location of Construction:
Purpose of Construction: 2 zMeW
Single Family Commercial Multi -Family _V
Development Review Processing Fee: ................................................ $100.00
(Required of all projects for document processing)
Single Family Residence/Duplex Review Fee: ..................................... $50.00 $
Commercial/Multi-Family Review Fees:
(Fees include reviews of the 1st and 2°d submittals
• Review of existing or minimal technical documents: ........................
$200.00
$
• Initial review' of technical civil engineering documents: ................
$600.00
$ &C2Q29
• Traffic Impact Study Review Fee: ....................................................
$600.00
$
• Trip Generation Study Review Fee: ..................................................
$200.00
$
• Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) Review Fee: .......................
$200.00
$
• O & M Schedule Review & SMA Recording Fee .............................
$100.00
$
• Construction Control Plan................................................................. $100.00 $ /DD. DLJ
Each Application will be reviewed by staff once and returned for changes. If after review of the second submittal changes requested by staff
have not been fully made to the civil/stormwater/traffic documents, further reviews will be subject to the following Resubmittal Fees:
• Resubmittal Fees:
31 submittal ('/2 initial review fee): .................................................... $300.00 $ ap
41h submittal (full initial review fee) :................................................. $600.00 $
All subsequent submittals: ................................................................. $600.00 X = $
(Full initial review fee)
TOTAL. REVIEW FEES (due at time of Building Permit issuance): $ /,700,
PLEASE NOTE THAT IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE FEES, THERE WILL BE LICENSING AND
PERMITTING FEES REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES WITHIN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
www.ci.wheatridge.co.us
Rev 05/19
BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING LLC
3253 N. GAYLORD ST.
DENVER, CO 80205
(720) 540-8629 (Phone)
Opinion of Probable Cost
Date: 26 -Apr -19
Project: FR1901
Location: Wheat Ridge, CO
By: JSD
1
ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total
2
Alley
1
EA
$14,000.00
$14,000.00
3
Landscaping
1
EA
30,000.00
$30,000.00
4
Grading/Ponds
1
EA
$1070.00
10,000.00
5
Walks
1
EA
6,000.00
$6,000.00
s
Flatwork/Patios
1
EA
6,000.00
670.00
a
Contingency
25%
$16,500.00
12
*The above cost estimate numbers are based on information provided by the Contractor, and are subject to change
based on fluctuations in the cost of labor and materials.
BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING LLC
3253 N. GAYLORD ST.
DENVER, CO 80205
(720) 540-8629 (Phone)
Opinion of Probable Cost
Date: 26 -Apr -19
Project: FR1901
Location: Wheat Ridge, CO
By: JSD
t
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total
z
6" Sidewalk
1400 1
SF
$10.00
$14,000.00
3
Curb and 2' Gutter
270
LF
30.00
8,100.00
4
Asphalt - Match Existing Thickness
1800
SF
$10.00
$18,000.00
5
Alley Entrance
1
EA
7,500.00
7,500.00
6
ADA Ramp
2
EA
1,500.00
3,000.00
e
Contingency
25%
12,650.00
11
iz
, ' >ti; . " NTS
$93160.0
'The above cost estimate numbers are based on information provided by the Contractor, and are subject to change
based on fluctuations in the cost of labor and materials.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING
APPROVED FOR:
o DRAINAGE 0 SIDEWO&K
0 CURS & GUTTER 0 STREET
Rf MISCELLANEOUS d PLAT i
Itemized Engineers Cost Estimate
CQMMENT
05108n0119
CML ENGINEER
SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PUBLICWORKS
DATE 04/29/2019
RECEIVED 04/29/2019
5th Submittal
T-1,-.
City Of
W heat -Midge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P:303.235.2846 F:303.235.2857
January 25, 2019
OFFICIAL ADDRESS NOTIFICATION
NOTIFICATION is hereby given that the following address has been assigned to the property/properties as
indicated below:
NEW ADDRESS: 3300, 3308, 3316, 3324 Ames Street
CURRENT ADDRESS: Vacant Lot
• Subdivision: Columbia Heights Resub of Blk 5, Lot 10 and 11, Tract/Key AB,
Section Parcel # 39-251-12-009
NOTES: This is a courtesy notification. This addressing is preliminary noticing for water and sanitation taps
and electric meters only.
AUTHORIZED BY: DATE:
DISTRIBUTION:
1. Property Owner
2. Applicant
3. Xcel Energy, sandra.cardenas(&xcelenergy.com
4. Wheat Ridge Water District
5. Wheat Ridge Sanitation District
6. Wheat Ridge Building Division
7. Log File
NOTE: Please notify all other parties concerned.
ADDRESS MAP UPDATED BY: DATE:
www.d.wheatridge.co.us
Vicinity Map
3300AA,1ES STREET. WNFAT ROW. OOLORADOOM12
UYr510 AND 11JOGETHER WITH THE WEST tf3 OF THE VACATED AUZY
AWOOMO SAGO LOTS. A AMOCIVOOM OF OL= 5 OF OOLW W IA "COM,
=PM OF JAN. STATE OF OQ MjWO
/ w
� -yr•
�____ _• _ as
rte•
aain � i�ann+wn sFu»
A
i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Building Inspection Division
(303) 235-2855 Office
INSPECTION NOTICE
4
Inspection Type:E t
Job Address: ,� � 66 A rye -f cel
Permit Number: ;_ A 0 01__
t
1
a
f
i
❑ No one available for inspection: Time 0` it �� AM/PM
Re -Inspection required:Ce)No
When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at:
http.11www. ci. wheatridge. co. ushnspection
Date: Inspector: f1
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
AZawas ec Retrotec rCloud
Quality Assurance Report
Single Direction Multi Point Blower Door Test
PASS Your Result: 1.71 ACH50 (796.18 CFM60 * 60 / 27921 ft)
Target < 4 ACH50
Test Information
Test Name
Test Date
Export id
Company Name
Technician Name
Technician Email
Building Information
Address
City
State
Zip/postal Code
Country
Year Constructed
Elevation
Address Verified?
Building Latitude, Longitude
GPS validation
Estimated Distance From Address
Test Equipment
Fan Model
Fan Serial Number
Pressure Gauge Model
Gauge Serial Number
Environmental Conditions
Pre-test Indoor Temperature
Pre-test Outdoor Temperature
Wind Speed
Average Barometric Pressure
Test Dimensions
Conditioned Floor Area
Envelope Area
Volume
3300 Ames St
2020-05-05 09:32 AM (MDT)
U9DO3JYF
Ultimate Heating & Cooling
Kyle Massler
kyle@uhcdenver.com
3300 Ames St
Wheat Ridge
CO
80212
United States
2020
5469 ft
Yes
39.764028, -105.054404
Latitude/Longitude: 39.763947. -105.054333:
Accuracy: 16 ft
27 ft
Retrotec 1000/2000
1FN002062
Retrotec DM 32 10A
402271
75 °F
55 °F
0 MPH
102.6 kPa
2888 ft2
2559 ft2
27921 ft3
retry"
Test Results Summary
Test Type
Flow Reference Pressure
Time Averaging
Corrected Flow
Air Changes Per Hour
Percent Uncertainty
Correlation
Intercept
Slope
Test Results
Test Data Set 1
Flow Direction
Gauge Location
Retrotec rCloud
Single Direction Multi Point Blower Door Test
50 Pa
10 seconds
796.18 CFM @ 50 Pa
1.711
2.3%
0.998
48.299
0.716
Depressurize
Inside
Baseline Pressure, Initial (Pa)
-0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.3
Baseline Duration 16 seconds
Average baseline -0.17 Pa
Measured Pressure (Pa) -15.05 -22.45 -29.34 -37.31
Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - C8] (Pa) 17.51 29.29 42.22
Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - B] (Pa) 13.62
Flow (CFM) 332.47 430.64 518.02 645.41
Measured Pressure (Pa) -45.3 -52.23 -61.26
Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - C8] (Pa)
Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - B] (Pa) 17.54 21.03 26.7
Flow (CFM) 732.41 801.98 903.65
Baseline Pressure, Final Pa
-0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3
Baseline Duration 14 seconds
Average baseline -0.37 Pa
2
�rerroL"�
Test Notes
No notes entered.
Flow Equation Parameters - Factory Default
Retrotec rCloud
Fan Model Retrotec 1000/2000
Fan Serial Number 1 FN002062
Flow equation parameters - 1131
Units Used For Flow Parameters in Equation CFM
Fan pressure (FP) is the measured fan pressure when using a self -referenced fan or when the room pressure is
negative. If using a fan which is not self -referenced, and the room pressure is positive, fan pressure is calculated
by subtracting the measured room pressure from the absolute value of the fan pressure.
If PrA is greater than 0 or fan is self -referencing: FP = jPrBj - PrA
If PrA is less than 0 or fan is self -referencing: FP = PrB
Flow calculations are not valid if fan pressure is less than either MF or (K2 x IRPI)
rN = tan pressure, KF' = room pressure
Range
N
K
K1
K2
K3
K4
MF
Open
0.5214
519.6183
-0.0700
0.8000
-0.1150
1
8.6
A
0.5030
264.9959
-0.0750
1.0000
0.0000
1
12
B
0.5000
174.8824
0.0000
0.3000
0.0000
1
10
C8
0.5000
78.5000
-0.0200
0.5000
0.0160
1
10
C6
0.5050
61.3000
0.0540
0.5000
0.0040
1
10
C4
0.5077
42.0000
0.0090
0.5000
0.0005
1
10
C2
0.5200
22.0000
0.1100
0.5000
-0.0010
1
10
C1
0.5410
11.9239
0.1300
0.4000
0.0014
1
10
L4
0.4800
4.0995
0.0030
1.0000
0.0004
1
10
L2
0.5020
2.0678
0.0000
0.5000
0.0001
1
10
L1
0.4925
1.1614
0.1000
0.5000
0.0001
1
10
flow =(FP
- RIP xK1)"x(K+K3x
FP) x
K4
3