The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3316 Ames Street8 BAA l � $3ySystesInsulatiNon Certificate This form must be filled out and posted to comply with bu' requirements. Meets IRC Sections N1101.3, N1101.41, and N110 code 1.8 requirements. The following spray PO►yurethane foam Product(s) has/have been installed. Bayseal' OC Open -Cell Spray Foam Insulation Bayseai'A" CC Closed -Cell Spray Foam Insulation Bayseal""' PP Closed -Cell Spray Foam Insulation Consult International Building Code, Chapter 26 -Plastic and International Residential Code (IRC) R314 Foam Plastics for specific reqntsTts.Tes Polyurethane foam insulation system(s) has/have been installedhe spray n accordance with manufacturer's processing guidelines to provide a thermal resistance of: Attic Area Area Insulated Aged ie Thickness R -Val *- Sloped Ceilings R '' At i inches Walls (Location: R- At inches Walls (Location: ) R- At inches Floors (over an unheated crawls ) R At inches ace Crawl Space Perimeter p ) R At inches Basement Exterior Walls R At inches Other (Location: R- At inches ** Nominal thicknesses are representative of field, spray -applied ffoam material At inches lobsite Address: _.�� i � � � Date of Installation:_1 O -j 6_. iq Building Contractor: Insulation Contractor:a �:�� ,Q, Phone: Zo Installed By: v INSULATION CERTIFICATE -DO NOT REMOVE -Please Post Near Electrical Panel - est office 100 Spring er Roed west office — _ _ . -- _ ... 'ring, 7X 77388 7389 Po Box 6460 Phoenix, AZ 85005 : _ _ - 221.3626 350.9000 1800.289.8272 '8.6450 Tel 602.269.9711Bay Fax 602.269-9115 , 020CS Ba;-er MateriaiScience. FJI rig,+!a rumn...r Builders Statement CertainTeed SAINT GOBAIN insulSaNfr-cc"SP Flober Glass nigulaV Homeowner Name / JObsite Na e Home Address Installer/Cont r tor (sign) _ Company Name t 1 Date Builder (sign) Company Name Date Inspected By (sign if required) Date f>l rf, T ) t'i'nt;Tl a R -VALUE NO. BAGS PER 1,000 SO. Fr. NET AREA To obtain thermal resistance (R) of. 49 44 38 30Jam_ — 22 19 -- 13 CEILINGS WALLS FLOORS Number of bags 28.9 23 — 2--0.8 17,9 13.8 1— 18-- 99 _ 8.6 5.9 MAXIMUM NET COVERAGE MINIMUM INITIAL INSTALLED WEIGHT THICKNESS- MINIMUM SETTLED Contents of bag should we Weight per sq. ft of installed THICKNESS not cover more than: (sq. ft.) insulation should not be less than: (lbsisq. ft.) Installed insulation should not be less than: (inches) Installed insulation should not 34.5 0.897 be less than: (inches) 42.6 21 48.0 0.727 18.25 21,75 5.7 0.646 18.25 72.5 0.556 1450 16.50 84.8 0.427 11.50 14.50 101.4 0.366 10.00 11.50 116.2 0.306 8 50 10.00 170.4 0.287 7.50 8.50 200.5 0.182 525 7.50 0.155 525 r/ - THERMAL PERFORMANCE—ATTIC BLOWING APPLICATION • in accordance with the chart above, you must install the minimum number of bags per 1,000 sq. ft. of net area for each R -value listed. • The maximum net coverage must not exceed that specified for each R -value. • The insulation must be installed at or above the specified installed thickness for each R -value. • Failure to install the required minimum weight per sq. ft. of insulation at or above the initial installed thickness will result in reduced stvalue. • This product should not be mixed with other blown insulations or the thermal claims will become invalid. DANGER: RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURES—TO PREVENT OVERHEATING, DO NOT INSULATE ON TOP OR WITHIN 3" R TO FLUORESCENT FIXTURES WITH THERMALLY PROTECTED BALLASTS. OF SUCH DEVICES. THIS WARNING DOES NOT APPLY TO TYPE IC LIGHT FIXTURES O H Company Name: Inspector Signature: Date of Inspection: The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List Notes Final Roof Notes Certified Building Cons CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 5 of 5 The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List Notes Final Roof Roof Inspection ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Structural roof components ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Flashing for roof and walls ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Structural roof components • N/A , Pass ❑ Fail If new sheathing is installed verify that it is listed in the permit description (Valuation must be adjusted) Q N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify sheathing nail pattern (See Policy and Procedures) N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Crickets and saddles where needed '❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify B vent must have boot same gauge as pipe ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify vent caps ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Step flashing shall be min. of 44 piece per shingle ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage ❑ N/A i Pass ❑ Fail Ice and water shield 2' in heated wall spaces ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Underlayments must follow 2012 IRC/2012 IBC ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify roof slope for proper drainage ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall have min. 2" of overlap ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge should extend down min. 2" past roof deck ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall be mechanically fastened 12" OC N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail 90 LB roll roofing shall not be applied to roof slopes less than 2:12 slope: Exception, detached garages, patios, carports, open on three sides with min. slope of 1:12 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min. slope 1/4:12 slope must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's letter of warranty with the address on the letter for final inspection Metal Roof Shingles Requirements I N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less than 3:12 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min. of 8" from the centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow line with the sections overlapping a min. of 4" Tile Roof Requirements ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete tile shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope tN/A N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 4 of 5 Company Name: Inspector Signature: Date of Inspection: The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List Notes Mid -hoof Notes Certified Building Consultants CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 3 of 5 ;6 N/A 1i Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less than 3:12 J_ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof i� N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min. of 8" from the / centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow line with the sections overlapping a min. of 4" Tile Roof Requirements N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete tile shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 2 of 5 The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List Notes Mid -Roof Roof Inspection ❑ N/A X Pass ❑ Fail Structural roof components ❑ N/A '.151`lpass ❑ Fail Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist ❑ N/A X Pass ❑ Fail Flashing for roof and walls ❑ N/A - Pass ❑ Fail If new sheathing is installed, verify that it is listed in the permit description (Valuation must be adjusted) ❑ N/A ass ❑ Fail Verify sheathing nail pattern (see Policy and Procedures) ON/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Crickets and saddles where needed ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify vent must have boot same gauge as pipe ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify vent caps ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted ❑ N/APass ❑ Fail Step flashing shall be min. of 44 piece per shingle N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Ice and water shield 2' in heated wall spaces ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Underlayments must follow 2012 IRC/2012 IBC ❑ N/A /1 Pass ❑ Fail Verify roof slope for proper damage ❑ N/A � Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall have min. of 2" overlap ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge should extend down min. 2" past roof deck ❑ N/A ,-?Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall be mechanically fastened 12" OC N/A / ❑ Pass ❑ Fail 90 LB roof roofing shall not be applied to roof slopes less than 2:12 slope. Exception, detached garages, patios, carports, open on three sides with min. slope of 1:12 f� N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Above roof insulation R-25 �) N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Below roof residential R-38 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Below roof commercial R-32 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min. slope 1/4:12 slope must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Must have manufacturer's letter of warranty with the address on the letter for final inspection Metal Roof Shingles Requirements ;6 N/A 1i Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less than 3:12 J_ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof i� N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min. of 8" from the / centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow line with the sections overlapping a min. of 4" Tile Roof Requirements N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete tile shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 2 of 5 The City of Wheat Ridge Third Party Form Check List Property Address I/& ` (--1- Permit Number' Permit Issued Date r) lei' Owner Information Property Owner Information iNii V1 ITF Property Owner Address' Inspector Information Inspection Company Certified Building Consultants Inspector Name Kraig Stanforth;Travis Stanforth Inspector Contact info. 720-940-1180 TStanforthCBC(a_gmail.com Inspector Statement of Acknowledgement *1 hereby acknowledge the roof I am inspecting is 6/12 or over. All roofs that are under 6/12 must be inspected by the City of Wheat Ridge Building Department. *1 hereby acknowledge the roofing system for the referenced building has been inspected and found to be in compliance with the minimum requirements of the 2012 IRC and 2012 IBC as well as the City of Wheat Ridge Policies and Procedures and manufacturer's recommendati� ons ate, specifications. Inspector: ��` Date: Pron��Owner Statement of Acknowledaement *1 hereby acknowledge that I am the owner of the building referenced above and I give my consent for the listed third -party inspection company to perform my roof i spection in lieu of the City of Wheat Rjjage Building Diy' Sion inspection. Property Owner/Agent: Date:' This original document, as well as the roofing checklist, must be submitted to the Chief Building Official within seven days of the final inspection. Drop off in person Permit Counter 2 Floor 7500 W. 29" Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Submit via Email Kcook(a-),ci.wheatridqe.co.us CSC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 2 of Retrotec rCloud Test Notes No notes entered. Flow Equation Parameters - Factory Default Fan Model Retrotec 1000/2000 Fan Serial Number 1 FN002062 Flow equation parameters - B1 Units Used For Flow Parameters in Equation CFM Fan pressure (FP) is the measured fan pressure when using a self -referenced fan or when the room pressure is negative. If using a fan which is not self -referenced, and the room pressure is positive, fan pressure is calculated by subtracting the measured room pressure from the absolute value of the fan pressure. If PrA is greater than 0 or fan is self -referencing: FP = jPrBj - PrA If PrA is less than 0 or fan is self -referencing: FP = PrB Flow calculations are not valid if fan pressure is less than either MF or (K2 x IRPI) FP = fan pressure, RP = room pressure Range N K K1 K2 K3 K4 MF Open 0.5214 519.6183 -0.0700 0.8000 -0.1150 1 8.6 A 0.5030 264.9959 -0.0750 1.0000 0.0000 1 12 B 0.5000 174.8824 0.0000 0.3000 0.0000 1 10 C8 0.5000 78.5000 -0.0200 0.5000 0.0160 1 10 C6 0.5050 61.3000 0.0540 0.5000 0.0040 1 10 C4 0.5077 42.0000 0.0090 0.5000 0.0005 1 10 C2 0.5200 22.0000 0.1100 0.5000 -0.0010 1 10 C1 0.5410 11.9239 0.1300 0.4000 0.0014 1 10 L4 0.4800 4.0995 0.0030 1.0000 0.0004 1 10 L2 0.5020 2.0678 0.0000 0.5000 0.0001 1 10 L1 0.4925 1.1614 0.1000 0.5000 0.0001 1 10 flow =(FP -RPxK1)"x(K+K3x FP) xK4 3 11 �rerroLw� Test Results Summary Test Type Flow Reference Pressure Time Averaging Corrected Flow Air Changes Per Hour Percent Uncertainty Correlation Intercept Slope Test Results Test Data Set 1 Flow Direction Gauge Location Retrotec rCloud Single Direction Multi Point Blower Door Test 50 Pa 10 seconds 854.47 CFM c@ 50 Pa 1.836 0.2% 1.000 59.750 0.680 Depressurize Inside Baseline Pressure, Initial (Pa) 0 -0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baseline Duration 15 seconds Average baseline -0.01 Pa Measured Pressure (Pa) -15.1 -23.07 -30.78 -37.71 Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - C8] (Pa) 22.12 39.31 58.02 75.99 Flow (CFM) 373.38 499.02 608.21 698.34 Measured Pressure (Pa) -45.17 -52.33 -59.75 Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - C8] (Pa) 96.8 117.94 140.46 Flow (CFM) 791.24 876.87 961.05 Baseline Pressure, Final Pa -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.6 -0.8 Baseline Duration 16 seconds Average baseline -0.57 Pa Retrotec rCloud Quality Assurance Report Single Direction Multi Point Blower Door Test PASS Your Result: 1.84 ACH60 (854.47 CFM50 * 60 / 27921 ft3) Tar et < 4 ACH50 Test Information Test Name Test Date Export id Company Name Technician Name Technician Email Building Information Address City State Zip/postal Code Country Year Constructed Elevation Address Verified? Building Latitude, Longitude GPS validation Estimated Distance From Address Test Equipment Fan Model Fan Serial Number Pressure Gauge Model Gauge Serial Number Environmental Conditions Pre-test Indoor Temperature Pre-test Outdoor Temperature Wind Speed Average Barometric Pressure Test Dimensions Conditioned Floor Area Envelope Area Volume 3016 Ames St 2020-05-05 10:04 AM (MDT) CKLUQGLB Ultimate Heating & Cooling Kyle Massler kyle@uhcdenver.com 3316 Ames St Wheat Ridge CO 80212 United States 2020 5466 ft Yes 39.764153, -105.054406 Latitude/Lonaitude: 39.764160. -105.054281: Accuracy: 16 ft 27 ft Retrotec 1000/2000 1FN002062 Retrotec DM32 10A 402271 73 OF 48 OF 0 MPH 102.6 kPa 2888 ftZ 2559 ft2 27921 ft3 C., ° ° Z N HfD art n a CrJ Cil C n fi °.�tto �W KyZ w ° ��oa00 °ca ; A N o row r t.) e < n O m n w O HCD (D ° � iyN�� eso til - O� �• P- (D t�JZ�r �� a N ° o � ��C) CD `♦ �. NH X Cd C O '� rh 0 M (D cn R' � C � � 1 rt D m m w M b O° tv ►cy ° o 0 //{��n Imo, 117 N I -h f'1 N. O /Z� O L7 L� "O a d m l V ° 0 m x zNil m H m hi p p rr~ nI-h ?ego Cl t-hxrr n w n a� w O Cror1 O c� -4 1 o N. Y W m tr' O oC A \I H n N a O Z C. � j ci y opa k E � r rt 0 eD o B rt � o li O O d z f ft N n a I� „ N ep o Q. N � O i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: IPF/ F w',L) Job Address: 3 3 lam O`� vlil E? S .57 ;/ Permit Number: ? c) I /2/0 2 ,2 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http✓/www.ci, wheatridge.co, usl'inspection L, Dater Inspector: i DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE _ G Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number:`�.- ❑ No one available for inspection: Tirr/e!!2 ZO CM�PM Re -Inspection required: Yes &0- When corrections have been made, schedule for re;inSpUction online at: http✓/www.ci.wheatridge.co.uslinspectiop — '°_, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE _:�9�Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: n" 1` 19 �- ► �-'� Job Address: 3� WoYV�L> Permit Number: C? de C� O \ () CC -1 '-a 9 p rr"�, (e f rvP G / eqr C yrs 65;, ► u —S_ c< fir 7P . ❑ No one available for inspection: Time 7 : 2r� M PM Re -Inspection require Yel No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date')- - 0261-u Inspector: ®O NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number: ad l c-! p ❑ No one available for inspection: Time U /'),�-- AM/PM Re -Inspection required:Ye No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http✓/www.ci. wheatridge.co. uslinspection Date: '` o ? o Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE The City of Wheat Ridge Third Party Form Check List Property Address ,4� Permit Number _ Permit Issued Date t) nR a Owner Information Property Owner Information //Vdya IT Property Owner Address D3 / o A&t-W ,S Inspector Information Inspection Company Certified Building Consultants Inspector Name Kraig Stanforth;Travis Stanforth Inspector Contact info. 720-940-1180 TStanforthCBC(5gmail.com Inspector Statement of Acknowledgement *1 hereby acknowledge the roof I am inspecting is 6/12 or over. All roofs that are under 6/12 must be inspected by the City of Wheat Ridge Building Department. *1 hereby acknowledge the roofing system for the referenced building has been inspected and found to be in compliance with the minimum requirements of the 2012 IRC and 2012 IBC as well as the City of Wheat Ridge Policies and Procedures and manufacturer's r Tren ations a specifications. Inspector: Date: *1 hereby acknowledge that I am the owner of the building referenced above and I give my consent for the listed third -party inspection company to perform my r f i pecti in lieu of the City of Wheat Ri 4Bu'ldingDi v}'�ion inspection. Property Owner/Agent: Date: This original document, as wel as the roofing checklist, must be submitted to the Chief Building Official within seven days of the final inspection. Drop off in person Permit Counter 2nd Floor 7500 W. 29" Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Submit via Email Kcook(abci.wheatridqe.co.us CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 2 of 6 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less than 3:12 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min. of 8" from the centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow line with the sections overlapping a min. of 4" Tile Roof Requirements N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete tile shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 2 of 5 The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List Notes Mid -Roof Roof Inspection ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Structural roof components ❑ N/A X"Pass ❑ Fail Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist ❑ N/A yS�Pass ❑ Fail Flashing for roof and walls ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail If new sheathing is installed, verify that it is listed in the permit description (Valuation must be adjusted) ❑ N/A ass ❑ Fail Verify sheathing nail pattern (see Policy and Procedures) /O N/A ❑ . Pass ❑ Fail Crickets and saddles where needed ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify vent must have boot same gauge as pipe ❑ IN Pass ❑ Fail Verify vent caps ❑ N/A Pass )Nass ❑ Fail Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted ❑ N/A ❑ Fail Step flashing shall be min. of 44 piece per shingle iMON/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage /❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Ice and water shield 2' in heated wall spaces ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Underlayments must follow 2012 IRC/2012 IBC ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify roof slope for proper damage ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall have min. of 2" overlap ❑ N/A �J Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge should extend down min. 2" past roof deck ❑ N/A ,_ Pass c3 Fail Dripedge shall be mechanically fastened 12" OC /— N/A / Pass ❑ Fail 90 LB roof roofing shall not be applied to roof slopes less than 2:12 slope. Exception, detached garages, patios, carports, open on three sides with min. slope of 1:12 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Above roof insulation R-25 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Below roof residential R-38 �i N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Below roof commercial R-32 �P N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min. slope 1/4:12 slope must be installed in accordance with the manufacturers specifications. Must have manufacturers letter of warranty with the address on the letter for final inspection Metal Roof Shingles Requirements N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less than 3:12 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min. of 8" from the centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow line with the sections overlapping a min. of 4" Tile Roof Requirements N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete tile shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 2 of 5 Company Name: Inspector Signature: Date of Inspection: The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List Notes Mid -Roof Notes Certified Building Consultants CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 3 of 5 The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List Notes Final Roof Roof Inspection ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Structural roof components ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist ❑ N/A A Pass ❑ Fail Flashing for roof and walls ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Structural roof components ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail if new sheathing is installed verify that it is listed in the permit description (Valuation must be adjusted) N/A A Pass ❑ Fail Verify sheathing nail pattern (See Policy and Procedures) N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Crickets and saddles where needed ❑ N/A A( Pass ❑ Fail Verify B vent must have boot same gauge as pipe ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify vent caps ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Step flashing shall be min. of 44 piece per shingle ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Ice and water shield 2' in heated wall spaces ❑ N/APass ❑ Fail Underlayments must follow 2012 IRC/2012 IBC ❑ N/A JQ, Pass ❑ Fail Verify roof slope for proper drainage ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall have min. 2" of overlap ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge should extend down min. 2" past roof deck ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall be mechanically fastened 12" OC N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail 90 LB roll roofing shall not be applied to roof slopes less than 2:12 slope: Exception, detached garages, patios, carports, open on three sides with min. slope of 1:12 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min. slope 1/4:12 slope must be / installed in accordance with the manufacturer's letter of warranty with the address on the letter for final inspection Metal Roof Roof Shingles Requirements Requirements N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less than 3:12 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min. of 8" from the centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow line with the sections overlapping a min. of 4" Tile Roof Reauirements N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete tile shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 4 of 5 The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List Notes Final Roof Notes Company Name: Certified Building Inspector Signature: Date of Inspection: CBC Wheat Ridge Roof Inspection Packet Page 5 of 5 INSPECTION RECORD Inspection online form: http://Www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/inspection Cancellations must be submitted via the online form before 8 a.m. the day of the inspection Inspections will not be performed unless this card is posted on the project site Request an inspection before MIDNIGHT (11:59 PM) to receive an inspection the following business day PERMIT: 1 ADDRESS: 33fy)A �� t JOB CODE: Inspections Date Inspector Comments s /Piers Wiz.. / P.E. Letter tion Setback Cert. alls =wall r 6 tion wall Insulation 107 Slab on Grade Do Not Pour Concrete Prior To Approval Of The Above inspections Underground / Slab Inspections to Insp c o 201 UG Electrical/Cable/Conduit Comments 202 Sewer Underground Interior 0 G+�`c 302 Wall Sheathing. 203 Sewer Underground Exterior r� 204 Plumbing Underground Interior 205 Plumbing Underground Exterior 206 Water Line Underground 306 Mid -Roof Do Not Cover Underground or Below I In -Slab Work Prior To Approval Of The Above Inspections Rough Inspections Date Inspector Comments 302 Wall Sheathing. .y 303 Roof Sheathing�� 306 Mid -Roof 304 Sheer Wall Inspection 312 Temp. Const. Meter 308 Rough Electrical c 309 Rough Electrical Above Ceiling 310 Electrical Meter 316 Rough Mechanical p i) _ 4�' r`ti Z•.. I -" 317 Rough Mechanical -Above Ceiling 313 Rough Plumbing !/i•2 314 Rough Plumbing - Above Ceiling 315 Shower Pan SEE OVER FOR ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS III PERMIT:�DOm I16 ADDRESS: � ®.11(�Yl C� �� JOB CODE: Rough Inspections (continued) Date Inspector Comments 311 Fire Stopping 401 Gasline Pressure Test 403 Final Electrical 402 Gas Meter Release 1�r 405 Final Mechanical 301 Rough Framing (Penetrations complete) :'r = `- 305 Insulation ( . 409 Final Roof 320 Drywall Screw and Nail 410 Final Window/Door 321 Moisture Board/Shower Walls 324 House Wrap/Vapor Barrier 413 Flood plain Inspection** 307 Metal/Lath/Stucco Request inspections from these entities one week in advance: *For Zoning, landscaping and parking inspections please call 303-235-2846 **For Public Works, ROW and drainage inspections please call 303••235-2861 ***For fire inspections please contact the Fire Protection District for your project. 414 Fire Insp. / Fire Protection*** 323 Miscellaneous Final Inspections Date Inspector CommentsInitials 403 Final Electrical 405 Final Mechanical 407 Final Plumbing 409 Final Roof l f 410 Final Window/Door 412 PW Field Inspection** 413 Flood plain Inspection** Request inspections from these entities one week in advance: *For Zoning, landscaping and parking inspections please call 303-235-2846 **For Public Works, ROW and drainage inspections please call 303••235-2861 ***For fire inspections please contact the Fire Protection District for your project. 414 Fire Insp. / Fire Protection*** 415 Public Works Final** 416 Storm Water Mgmt.** 417 Zoning Final Inspection* Business License Approval 418 Building Final Inspection Note: All items must be completed and approved by Planning, Public Works, Fire and Building before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Approval of the Final Building Inspection does not constitute authorization of occupancy. For Low Voltage permits please be sure that rough inspections are completed by the Fire District and Electrical low voltage by the Building Division. i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSP CTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: 2- Permit Number: --- % ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required: YesNo When corrections have been made, A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE a� Inspection Type: Job Address: 'ETS Permit Number: ;20! l C)e-7 ::) ❑ No one available for inspection: Time' j' ._; 'AI /PM Re -Inspection required: Yes- t;IVo. When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http✓/www. ci, wheatridge. co, usrnspection Date: � - "; nspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 0 r)P Job Address: Permit Number: 11)(i C1 C) ❑ No one available for inspection: TimeorAP 6 M Re -Inspection required: Yep No D When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http://www.ci, wheatridge.co, us4nspection Date: t:7/ Inspector: s DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type:0 0 : Job Address: '13A \-p � r� Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes' No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http✓/www. ci. wheatridge. co. uslinspection Date: Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: `Z �. Job Address: l :��- Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: Tirrf'� ,�/PrlYll Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, scfi dule for re -inspection online at: http:Uwww.ci.wheatridge.co.usrnsp ion Date: 2. In pect\Pr DO NOT RE06VE THIS NOTICE A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number: (\ C\ ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: h ttp://www. ci, wheatridge. co. uarinspection Date: /t Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: `Z �. Job Address: l :��- Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: Tirrf'� ,�/PrlYll Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, scfi dule for re -inspection online at: http:Uwww.ci.wheatridge.co.usrnsp ion Date: 2. In pect\Pr DO NOT RE06VE THIS NOTICE A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number: (\ C\ ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: h ttp://www. ci, wheatridge. co. uarinspection Date: /t Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE ,-v _�, \ � Sy , ( n , �- dC"i1,,C, \L C i 1 � l ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http://www.ci. wheatridge.co. uslinspection Date: -'k i ) I i ' Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE BARTON CONSULTING AdwSERVICES P.E. Feaster Reality Attn: Jay Feaster 1415 Park Ave. W. #102 Denver, CO P: 720.891.7916 E: iay(&feasterrealtv.com BCS Project #: 18-209 3316-3324 Ames St. (North Building) Wheat Ridge, Colorado Barton Consulting Services, LLC 9249 S Broadway #200, STE 102 info@bartonconsulting.co Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 Phone: 303.997.9577 Schedule Site Observations & Inspections by Text @ 720.458.6658 RE: Soils Investigation; Cushman Geoscience, LLC Project Number 18-075 Foundation & Structural Design; BCS Design Documents Project Number 18-209 August 8, 2019 As requested, the following site visits of the aforementioned residential project were conducted. The following elements were observed and found to be in general compliance with the referenced design documents; and applicable local and national codes required for this type of construction. UFER/CEG It shall be noted that a UFER/CEG was observed on the foundation wall steel to be installed and located near the northeast corner of the north building. WING WALLS AND BASMENT WALLS AT PORCH- It shall be noted that porch wing walls have been reinforced with (2) #5 top and bottom and #4 at 18" O.C. each way and the front wall section is section B -B. ITEM PASS FAIL DATE TECH ]INITIALS NOTES Excavation / Open Hole 07/24/19 BY OTHERS – CUSHMAN GEO Foundation Footing X 07/11/19 JEP Partial Foundation Footing Re -OBS X 07/26/19 PMR Final Foundation Wall Steel / UFER X 08/01/19 JEP Wing Walls See Note Above Drain & Dampproofing 107/31/191BY OTHERS – CUSHMAN GEO We trust this letter meets the requirements for the Jefferson County Building Department. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you need additional information on this matter. Reviewed and Stamped By Scott D. Barton, PE 4643-;— 08.08.2019 w NN - Phone: 303.997.9577 - Barton Consulting Services LLC - info@bartonconsulting.co i CITY,OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office i INSPECTION NOTICE J 7- y^J . Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number: - � z: 27L_/ ❑ No one available for inspection: Time��,5-5 �- _AMA M Re -Inspection required: Yes When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: h ttp://www. ci. wheatridge. co. usdnspection Date:_1 ) • 1 'I � Inspector: -- DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address:r=.s- Permit Number: / T -O." QZ-2 . ❑ No one available for inspection: Time ��l1li'/PM Re -Inspection required:� No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http✓/www. ci. wheatridge. co. usfinspection Date: -4-,7 ?r Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE e A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 42 Job Address: /�-s_77— Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: Time A M Re -Inspection required: Ye!�'� No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http✓/www. cL wheatridge. co, usfinspection Date: /.,-�7 - /�7 Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE 1* � A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address:' i Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: TimeV. A( AM/ M � t Re -Inspection required:Yes%' No I When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http://www.ci. wheatridge. co. uslinspection Date: I5'/ 6 - ) f Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: 2SM Permit Number: Jb_ ❑ No one available for inspection: Tirrj ��M"/�M Re -Inspection required: Yeses°'' -lo When corrections have been made, sc edule for re -inspection online at: h ttp://www. ci. wheatridge. co. uslinspectio; t Date: Inspect V � K44, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line )23_5-25� ice • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPFC N NOTICE Inspection Type: �� L.�� Job Address: Permit Number: -;_::?zt>t 9-19) ) 0 2 f) r ❑ No one available for inspection: Time it �AM%RM Re -Inspection required: Yes �'No , When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 'Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: '53 1 %-_ 'e, /y) 1= C - Job Address: Permit Number:.1 /�, ❑ No one available for inspection: Time /PM Re -Inspection required: Yes �o �> When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: / f `"_Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE _:�9rBuilding Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: P_e7>3 Job Address: '3_� 1(z Permit Number:.;c ; ❑ No one available for inspection: TilneC)AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes �Lspection *When corrections have been made, at 303-234-5933 Date Inspector: ,--,�---------- DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: J Permit Number: IV t r42 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time 'A M Re -Inspection required: Yes �No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: �� Inspector: k—y DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Approved by: ej [% �lC' alt l IC 1C Inspec or Date City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29"' Ave. Wheat Ridge. CO 80033-8001 Y: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 FOUNDATION SETBACK AND ELEVATION CERTIFICATION For Commercial and Multi -Family Developments This form must be fully completed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of Colorado. This form must be accompanied by a Construction Control Plan following the procedure found on the reverse side of this form. DATE: o 9_/11, 1a_ PERMIT# Q0.1!20 ADDRESS: 3311 Yk,&,,es SE LOT t , BLOCK , Fe, -Sr ,r SUBDIVISION SURVEYOR: I hereby certify that the elevations and distances shown on the attached sheets and as stated below for the recently formed or constructed structural foundation for the above property have been measured by me or directly under my supervision. The MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCES from the property lines have been determined to be: FRONT: Z G 7 Z REAR: -74 11 SIDE: Zd 614 SIDE: S Z= The foundation corner ELEVATIONS (NAVD88) have been determined to be: 11a 7Y FRONT: 5"447 — REAR:S y:o7 SIDE: SIDE: All measurements have been determined on the following location: (Check only one): Top of proposed foundation wall prior to placement of concrete op of foundation wall subsequent to placement of concrete The setback elev 'on measurements are included on the attached Construction Control Plan. Signed Professional Surveyor Print fit, c.tr 4j ar, S 30 Date e Rev 11/2018 i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number: ;20> 6? l •f I t. �� alll� 1 '.�°" t:��1� 1Y. �._ `-'' i -i J `�-i � -'�"- �.._. ❑ No one available for inspection: Timet' Re -Inspection required: Yes :' qo - Q___ When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303 -234 - Date: Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: r i —Ta Permit Number: �� ❑ No one available for inspection: Time z �" 6 PM Re -Inspection required: Yes,,' No .- When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date:` .l S l T" Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: JobAddress: Permit Number: IJNo one available for inspection: Time �A M Re -Inspection required: Ye . No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http✓/www.ci. wheatridge.co. uslinspection Date: t ra' 1 `� Inspector: '"1 ---------- DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: - = 9 Job Address'�� Permit Numbe :� ❑ No one available for inspection: Ti M Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: <_� , Inspector: . z DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE BARTON CONSULTING AAWSERViCES P. E. Feaster Reality Attn: Jay Feaster 1415 Park Ave. W. #102 Denver, CO P: 720.891.7916 E: jay_(&feasterrcal .com BCS Project #: 18-209 3316-3324 Ames St. (North Building) Wheat Ridge, Colorado Barton Consulting Services, LLC 9249 S Broadway #200, STE 102 info@bartonconsulting.co Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 Phone: 303.997.9577 Schedule Site Observations & Inspections by Text a@ 720.458.6658 RE: Soils Investigation; Cushman Geoseience, LLC Project Number 18-075 Foundation & Structural Design; BCS Design Documents Project Number 18-209 August 8, 2019 As requested, the following site visits of the aforementioned residential project were conducted. The following elements were observed and found to be in general compliance with the referenced design documents; and applicable local and national codes required for this type of construction. UFER/CEG It shall be noted that a UFER/CEG was observed on the foundation wall steel to be installed and located near the northeast corner of the north building. WING WALLS AND BASMENT WALLS AT PORCH- It shall be noted that porch wing walls have been reinforced with (2) #5 top and bottom and #4 at 18" O.C. each way and the front wall section is section B -B. ITEM PASS FAIL DATE TECH INITIALS NOTES Excavation / Open Hole 07/24/19 BY OTBERS — CUSHMAN GEO Foundation Footing X 07/11/19 JEP Partial Foundation Footing Re -OBS X 07/26/19 PMR Final Foundation Wall Steel / UFER X 08/01/19 JEP Wing Walls (See Note Above Drain & Dampproofing 07/31/19 BY OTUERS — CUSIIMAN GEO We trust this letter meets the requirements for the Jefferson County Building Department. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you need additional information on this matter. Reviewed and Stamped By: Scott D. Barton, PE 0: •13 46434 08.08.2019./la SSlC7niai E� Phone: 303.997.9577 - Barton Consulting Services LLC - info@ bartonconsulting.co Barton Consulting Services, LLC BARTON CONSULTING 9249 S Broadway #200, STE 102 info@bartonconsulting.co 'SERVICES Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 Phone: 303.997.9577 P. E. Schedule Site Observations & Inspections by Text @ 720.458.6658 Feaster Reality August 8, 2019 Attn: Jay Feaster 1415 Park Ave. W. #102 Denver, CO P: 720.891.7916 E: iay(cr�feasterrea.com BCS Project #: 18-209 3300 - 3308 Ames St. (South Building) Wheat Ridge, Colorado RE: Cushman Geoscience, LLC Project Number 18-075 BCS Design Documents Project Number 18-209 As requested, the following site visits of the aforementioned residential project were conducted. The following elements were observed and found to be in general compliance with the referenced design documents; and applicable local and national codes required for this type of construction. UFER/CEG It shall be noted that a UFER/CEG was observed on the foundation wall steel to be installed and located near the southeast corner of the south building. WING WALLS AND BASMENT WALLS AT PORCH- It shall be noted that porch wing walls have been reinforced with (2) #5 top and bottom and #4 at 18" O.C. each way and the front wall section is section B -B. ITEM PASS FAIL DATE TECH NOTES MTIALS Excavation / Open Hole 07/24/19 BY OTHERS — CUSHNLAN GEO Foundation Footing / Pier X 07/17/19 JEP / GS Foundation Wall Steel / UFER X 07/26/19 PMR Partial Foundation Wall Steel / UFER X 08/01/19 JEP Final & Wing Walls See Note Above Drain & Dampproofing 08/07/19 BY OTIIERS — CUSHMAN GEO We trust this letter meets the requirements for the Jefferson County Building Department. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you need additional information on this matter. 1�4�643�4: -a • 08.08.2019 �O' Reviewed and Stamped By: � NALE�G\� Scott D. Barton, PE Phone: 303.997.9577 - Barton Consulting Services LLC - info@bartonconsulting.co i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE _1�9rBuilding Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 62- 4 " Job Address: I So Amg:6- z5 -7 -- Permit Number:'�-?/'Q q7 `7 vrj3i� ❑ No one available for inspection: �M Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303 -234 - Date: `nf �'7 , l,;�, Inspector:_. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE ❑ No one available for inspection: Time f AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: ^� L` i Inspector:--) DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE e - t i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division �(303) (303) 234-5933 Inspection line 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: 1 u v!-� fY) C.) < Permit Number: C,,1Ci (`; , (.,C, ❑ No one available for inspection: Time f AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: ^� L` i Inspector:--) DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM f� Re -Inspection required: YesN When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date:`") f `% VT Inspector: ;-"-� DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE City of Wheat Ridge Duplex - New PERMIT - 201901097 PERMIT NO: 201901097 ISSUED: 07/08/2019 JOB ADDRESS: 3316 Ames St EXPIRES: 07/07/2020 JOB DESCRIPTION: New 2 story duplex with unfinished basement - 1,930 sq ft total with 830 sq ft detached garage *** CONTACTS *** OWNER NOVY DEVELOPMENT LLC GC (303)369-7977 TOMMY CAGLE 190113 Q BUILDERS, LLC SUB (303)522-3872 LUIS MORGAN 110057 PROLINE PLUMBING LLC SUB (720)272-1288 DIEGO TELLEZ 120187 L&D ELECTRIC LLC SUB (303)289-2070 LLOYD LADD MATTHEW ROBLEDO 090062 ULTIMATE HEATING & COOLING LLC *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE: UA / Unassigned USE: UA / Unassigned SUBDIVISION CODE: 2412 / LAKESIDE, STEWART GARDENS, OLI BLOCK/LOT#: / *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 425,000.00 FEES Total Valuation 0.00 Plan Review Fee 2,098.40 Use Tax 8,925.00 Permit Fee 3,228.30 Engin. Review Fee 150.00 ** TOTAL ** 14,401.70 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** All roughs to be done at Framing Inspection. Approved per plans and red -line notes on plans. Must comply with 2012 IRC, 2017 NEC and all applicable City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Codes. Work is subject to field inspections. As part of the foundation inspection and PRIOR to the placement of concrete and before proceeding with any further construction, a completed, signed and sealed, Foundation Setback and Elevation Certification shall be submitted to the City for review. The certification form shall be fully completed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the state of Colorado, stating that the foundation was constructed in compliance with all applicable minimum setback and elevation requirements of the City. Owner/Contractor is responsible for locating property lines and constructing improvements according to the approved plan and required development standards. The City is not responsible for inaccurate information submitted within the plan set and any construction errors resulting from inaccurate information. Prior to project completion or granting of a Certificate of Occupancy, an As -Built Survey or Improvement Survey Plat shall be submitted to the City. Landscaping removed or damaged during construction must be replaced prior to final inspection. No C.O. may be issued until public improvements are complete as identified in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. All landscaping shall be in conformance with Section 26-502 of the Zoning and Development prior to C.O., a landscape escrow agreement with financial guarantee in the amount of 125% of the cost of the installation shall be required. ROW permit required for sidewalk construction. I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications, applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with this ermit. I further attest that I am legally authorized to include all entities named within this document as partes to the work to be performed and that all wo�r_k to be performed is did in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications. Signature of OWNER or COCTOR (Circle one) Date I . This permit was issued based on the information provided in thepermit application and accompanying plans and specifications and is subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures. 2. This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the originalpermit fee. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees androcedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of the Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed. 4, No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a change, of the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services Division. 6. The issuance or granting of a permit sh 11 not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, an violation of any provision of any applicable code or anyinance or regflption of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to field inspection. Signature of Chief Building Official Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. City of Wheat Lgle CcUMMut t��ry t�rvrcOPMEN�l- Building & Inspection Services 7500 W. 29" Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855 * Fax: 303-237-8929 Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Email: permits ci.wheatridge.co.us FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date: �,., O-ql / Plan/Permit # ac� � lj (�j 0 Plan Review Fee:. joq, yo Building Permit Application Complete all applicable highlighted areas on both sides of this form. Incomplete applications may not be processed. *** Property Address; —290999M, 3316,:Ames St. Wheat Ridge, CO Property Owner (please print): Jay Feaster phone: Property Owner Email:. jay@feasterrealty.com Tenant Name (Commercial Projects Only) Property Owner Mailing Address: (if different than property address) Address: 19510 W. 55th PI , State, Zip: Golden, CO 80403 Arch itectlEnaineer: Michael Fiebig, AIA / Fiebig Architecture ArchitectlEngneer E-mail; michael@fiebigarch.com Phone: 303.594.7584 Contractor Name: Tommy Cagle / Q Builders LLC City of Wheat Ridge License #: 190113 Contractor E-mail Address: gbuilders123@gmail.com For Plan Review Questions & Comments (please print): CONTACT NAME (please print): Jesse Donovan Phone: 303.369.7977 CONTACT EMAIL(please print): Jesse@brightlightereng.com Phone: 720.504.8629 Sub Contractors (Must provide Wheat Ridge License No & Signed Subcontractor Authorization form): Electrical: Plumbing: Mechanical: W.R. City License # W.R. City License # W.R. City License # Other City Licensed Sub: Other City Licensed Sub: City License # City License # Complete all highlighted fields. ❑COMMERCIAL FX RESIDENTIAL Provide description of work: For ALL projects, provide a detailed description of work to be performed, including current use of areas, proposed uses, square footage, existing condition and proposed new condition, appliance size and efficiency, type and amount of materials to be used, etc. Project includes construction of two new duplexes (4 units) on the existing 18,762 SF parcel. Each duplex will be 3,860 SF gross above -ground square footage (two stories) and have a 1,930 SF footprint. The duplexes will include unfinished basements with rough plumbing for future build -out. Each duplex will have an 830 SF detached garage. The lot size will be 56'x151' for a total area of 8456 SF per duplex. Included with the duplexes will be site work (approved through the ODP and SDP and Plat process) including a private alley, infiltration pond on a separate 1,850 SF tract, and new curb, gutter, and sidewalks. The current site is bare ground with no improvements on site. Sq. FULF t L� BTUs Gallons Amps Squares For Solar: KW # of Panels Requires structural For Commercial Projects Only; Occupancy Type: Construction Type: Occupancy Load: Square Footage: Project Values; (Contract value or the cost of all materials and labor included in the entire project) 1,700,000 for the entire project ($425,000 per application) OWNERICONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application; that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property to perform the described work and am also authorized by the legal owner of any entity included on this application to list that entity on this application. 1, the applicant for this building permit application, warrant the truthfulness of the information provided on the application. CIRCLE ONE: (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) or AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE of OWNER (CONTRACTOR) _. S190ature (tlrst and last name); DATE: 5/29/2019 Printed Name: Jesse Donovan DEPARTMENT USE ONLY ZONING COMMMENTS, 'fid Pevlewer� � 6/,+/[Cl BUILDING DEP` ENT t; tU1M1 NTS Reviewer: 0 =FANCY sstFICArIO02 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: PUBUC:wd3RKS COMMENTS: pig G7 RAF flczAt/`1 Yfl�d� >T S �"� 0A41—�0��'fi/ate 5 fietiiewc�r: L. �Q. l2tJl� Fr. [Building Division Valuation:AppAW W �I1j1il City of CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BUILDING AND INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION 7500 W 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 p. 303.235.2855.f 303.237.8929 Proof of Submission for Permitting/Plan Review (Water and Sanitation only) A copy of this form must be completed by each water and sanitation agency indicated on the Permit Submittal Checklist for the project type and be attached to the Building Permit Application at the time of submission. Applications presented for submission without a completed Proof of Submission form from a required agency will not be accepted or processed. Date: Project Address: Name of Firm/Individual submitting documents: Type/Description: Signature of Firm Representative or Individual: s1�4,eX- I, ([ ks &"P— , am a duly authorized representative of the agency indicated beloVand do, by my signature below, hereby acknowledge receipt of documents necessary for review and approval df the project indicated above. Agency represented: (Please check one) Wheat Ridge Water District o Consolidated Mutual Water District o Valley Water District o Denver Water Agency Notes: • Wheat Ridge Sanitation District o Clear Creek Sanitation District o Fruitdale Sanitation District o Westridge Sanitation District o Other Signatur Date: (Agency Repre I entative) 4. 9 $ City of `` idgc CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BUILDING AND INSPE'TIION SERVICES DIVISION 7500 W 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 p. 303.235.2855.f 303.237.8929 Proof of Submission for Permitting/Plan Review A copy of this form must be completed by each agency indicated on the Permit Submittal Checklist for the project type and be attached to the Building Permit Application at the time of submission. Applications presented for submission without a completed Proof of Submission form from a required agency will not be accepted or processed. Date: �', ► 3- M Project Address >3Do- 330$- 311• 5r3 Name of Firm/Individual submitting documents Project T JhL Signature of Firm Representative or Individual: DO NOT I, C)"A qfl 4i A - and do, by my signature below, hereby ac the project indicated above. Agency represented: (Please check one) o West Metro Fire Protection o Arvada Fire Protection o Wheat Ridge Water District o Consolidated Mutual Water District o Valley Water District p, Denver Water Agency Notes: 4 Id THIS POINT - FOR AGENCY USE ONLY am a duly authorized representative of the agency indicated below vledge receipt of documents necessary for review and approval of o Wheat Ridge Sanitation District o Clear Creek Sanitation District o Fruitdale Sanitation District o Westridge Sanitation District o Other -3 9 oa , ¢1., , 3 3 O B, 3114 Signature: Date: gency pres tive) City of Wh6atj�idge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUB -CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZATION FORM This form must be signed by each sub -contractor. This form will not be accepted with missing information. Subcontractor's City of Wheat Ridge License number must be provided in the applicable space. Sub c tractor's ance and I'Mnse must be up to date prior to permit issuance. Sao— Project Address: 3 3W 14 01W5 Permit #: General Contractor: Electrical Sub -Contractor Company Name: State License #: Wheat Ridge License #: Signature of Authorized Agent Plumbing Sub -Contractor Phone #• Master #• (required field) Date Company Name: rf C ,i yam' &Mb m Phone #: G S ,� u - 3r 72 - State License #: 2 i ` q Master #: LK 69 Z. Wheat Ridge License #: I0 C> 5'7 .._...._.__(required field) Signatu e o Authorized Agent Date Mechanical Contractor Company Name: Wheat Ridge License #:_ Signature of Authorized Agent Phone: _ ____ ...,(required field) Date City of Wh,6at COM � �� " � " SUB -CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZATION FORM This form must be signed by each sub -contractor. This form wiR not be accepted with misiing information. :Subcootraetor's City of hcxt Ridge Lk*msc�wmbev iumst bye -provided in the a"file .space. Subcnntractc r_s `insurance and lUmuse most -be ap -to date prier to permit ids*rice. Project Address: ;500, :�;�t�Y;�-�{„ "�1{ 'Permit #: — General Contractor: Electrical Snub -Contractor camparry Name- � V `l c.. . Pirrrrre #._..:� - 2 State License #: Master #:�L2 Sign atu of Aa riztd Agent arse Plumbing Sub -Contractor Compa Name-. Phone ##:. ,State License-#: ?gaster #: Wheat i2idge License #:(required tielc#) S g otvry -f Awthoriaed Agent I oaltc Mechanical Contractor Company Name: Phone: requi-red frebij. Signature of Authorized .Agent Date City of IF V h6 COMMUNITY "."j" 49-C 0m t UNiTy DEVELOPMENT This form must be signed by each sub -contractor. This form will not be accepted with missing information. Subcontractor's City of Wheat Ridge License number must be provided in the applicable space. Subcontractor's insurance and license must be up to date prior to permit issuance. Project Address: 3;, 33pye�3 .3-3 2- Permit e15- .51-71— General Contractor: (?5 2 _. o,,< - Electrical ,,<- Electrical Sub -Contractor Company Name: State License #: Phone 9: Master #: Wheat Ridge License #: (required field) Signature of Authorized Agent .Plumbing Sub -Contractor Company Name: State License #: Wheat Ridge License M Signature of Authorized Agent Mechanical Contractor Date Phone #: Master #: _(required field) Date Company Name:Phone: Coo, 0 M�*mt Ridge License#: %Cj) —(required field) LI S/ gnature of Authorized Ag�ht Date Jesse Donovan From: Kral, Bruce Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 3:22 PM To: Jesse Donovan Cc: Keith, Wayne; Charlie Keener Subject: RE: 3300 Ames - West Metro Submittal Attachments: 2019_03_26 AMES SDP REV3.pdf; 3300 AMES - CD.PDF Hello Jesse, Based on a preliminary review - The proposed access from the public streets and alley provides adequate fire access. The existing fire hydrant is acceptable for the required fire flow. Permits are required from the fire district for non-residential core and shell, all work on automatic fire protection systems, all work on automatic fire detection systems, underground fire line and for the storage of hazardous materials. WMFPD reserves the right to provide additional comments/requirements at the time when plans are formally submitted and reviewed per applicable codes and amendments. Bruce Kral, CFO Fire Marshal West Metro Fire Protection District 433 South Allison Parkway Lakewood, CO 80226 (303)989-4307 ext. S13 bkral@westmetrofire.or� Fire is Everyon,W# t^VM- This email is not intended to provide approval of any design elements. The comments contained herein are only offered for use by the designer and are based on conceptual ideas and not a thorough review. Approval will only be provided upon the submittal of formal plans for review. Further comments and requirements may be provided at that time. From: Jesse Donovan[mailto:jesse@brightlightereng.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 5:25 PM To: Kral, Bruce Cc: Keith, Wayne; Charlie Keener Subject: 3300 Ames - West Metro Submittal Bruce, I believe we sent this site to you for review previously, but we wanted to double check. See attached for the CD set as well as the elevations for the proposed two duplexes at 3300 Ames. Thanks, Jesse Donovan, PE I Principal Brightlighter Engineering LLC 1 720-504-8629 direct 3253 N. Gaylord Street, Denver, CO 80205 iesse@brightlightereng.com I www.brightlightereng.com !!!! CAUTION: This email originated from outside West Metro Fire Rescue's email server. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and have positive sender verification of the purpose of this email. Never enter USERNAME, PASSWORD or sensitive information on linked pages from this email. !!!! RESIDENTIAL Building Permit - Plan Review Worksheet Address: _ 33D01 �'� a $ 3 31 b 5324 Lot Size: sq. ft. Rev. 09/2017 -� Q�rwedl Zoning: �� / W*- t8-zs/�6 Lot Width: lil Property in the flood plain? If yes, notify PW Floodplain Administrator and add surveying condition FLD Subdivision: J;;. C,-, 4e,,(- Any conflict? (Y/N) C& -gyp 1'\,e3 w ( T (Z N) Related Cases: A&IZ - l$_2 S / 26 , NlS - V6 - 0 Type of project (applicable survey conditions in parenthesis): Maximum Lot Coverage: q- 0 % Existing Improvements (footprints): House: sq. ft. Shed: sq. ft. Detached garage: sq ft. Other: sq. ft. Total Existing sq. ft Lot Coverage % sq. ft. Proposed Improvements (footprints): House/addition: sq. ft. Shed: sq. ft Detached Garage: sq. ft. Other: sq. ft. Proposed+Existing Lot Coverage Required Setbacks: FR S S R Provided Setbacks: FR S S R sq. ft For additions or new construction, is the structure within 2 feet of minimum setbacks? If yes, add surveying condition FND. Maximum Height: I- ft. Proposed Height: Its g ft. N Maximum Size: Proposed Size: sq. ft. sq. ft. Does the bulk plane apply? (Y/N) If yes, does it meet on all sides (Y/N): FR S S R (See 26-642 and 26-120.C.1 — applies to all single-family structures (new, addition, accessory) in R -1C and R-3) Parkland Conditions Does the permit result in a new dwelling unit (new structure or conversion from non -res use)? If yes, have parkland dedication fees already been paid (eg with a previous land use approval)? If fees are owed, add condition PFEE, notify owner, notify building division, enter fee amount in ADG. Rev. 09/2017 Streetscape Conditions Does the permit result in any of the following conditions? ❑ Construction of new roads ❑ Platting of new lots ❑ New development ❑ Additions that increase gross floor area (not just the footprint) by 60% or more (proposed floor area — existing floor area ) / existing floor area = % increase If any box above is checked... For SF/DUPLEX—Is there existing ❑ Curb ❑ Gutter L15 -ft+ sidewalk adjacent to the property? If curb, gutter or sidewalk is missing, streetscape construction or fees -in -lieu will be required. MULTIFAMILY—Does the frontage meet current city standards? If not, streetscape construction or fees -in -lieu will be required. PRW Fees -in -lieu of dedication or construction are due at the time the permit is issued. 7 Access onditions (apply to all new driveways, garages, additions, or new homes/units) For one and two-family dwellings, the first 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar materials. ❑ For all uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer than 25' to any property line, except when used as joint access for two or more lots. ❑ In residential zone districts, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 feet in width. ❑ One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the street accesses are at least 30 feet apart, measured from the interior edges. ❑ For all uses, one access point per property is permitted. Landscaping Conditions (apply to additions and new dwelling units) ❑ For one -and two-family dwellings, one tree for every 70 feet of street frontage is required. Frontage of lot - width of driveway _� / 70 = (round up for required trees) Street trees required: Street trees provided: ❑ 100% of the front yard and 25% of the entire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance of C.O. ?�In the event that landscaping cannot be installed due to inclement weather prior to the issuance of a C.O., an escrow agreement with financial guarantees may be allowed to ensure future installation. 125% of the cost of the proposed improvements will be required with the agreement. These funds will be reimbursed back to the roperty owner or contractor once the improvements are in place. ` „ _� c c Dwelling Unit cpt> 's Tc-_�'5 p(,k ❑ Not approved as an independent dwelling unit. 42000 loqs-341 01 Oq ? CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE & LLC Geotechnical Investigation and Foundation Recommendations 3300 Ames St Wheat Ridge, CO 80212 Project Number 18-075 July 23, 2018 Prepared For Ames Partners LLC Attn: Jay Feaster 19510 W. 55th Place Golden, CO 80403 Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 S Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 303-475-7993 david.cushmangeo@gmail.com y CONTENTS Scopeof Work...............................................................................................................................................1 Existing Construction and Site Conditions....................................................................................................1 ProposedConstruction.................................................................................................................................1 SubsurfaceInvestigation...............................................................................................................................2 SubsurfaceConditions.................................................................................................................................. 2 LaboratoryTest Results................................................................................................................................ 3 Discussion of Expansive Soils........................................................................................................................3 SitePreparation............................................................................................................................................4 SiteExcavation.............................................................................................................................................. 5 Foundation Recommendations.....................................................................................................................5 Alternative Basement Foundation Recommendations........................................................................................6 FoundationWalls.......................................................................................................................................................7 FloorSlabs.....................................................................................................................................................7 SubsurfaceDrainage..................................................................................................................................... 8 SurfaceDrainage...........................................................................................................................................8 ExteriorFlatwork...........................................................................................................................................9 Radon............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Mold.............................................................................................................................................................. 9 CrawlspaceRecommendations.....................................................................................................................9 Limitationsand Exclusions............................................................................................................................9 References..................................................................................................................................................10 Tables Table 1: Subsurface Conditions Summary ......................... Table 2: Groundwater Summary ........................................ Table 3: Laboratory Test Results Summary ....................... Table 4: Summary of Risk Categories ................................. Attachments Figures Appendix A Appendix B ........................................................................... 2 ........................................................................... 2 ........................................................................... 3 ........................................................................... 4 Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 cx" d ��009a *o0 A609 V001 Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 1 As requested, Cushman Geoscience LLC (CG) has prepared geotechnical engineering recommendations for the proposed residential structures planned for the subject site. Scope of Work The scope included drilling exploratory boring(s), obtaining soils and/or bedrock samples at intervals in the bore holes, and subjecting the samples to various laboratory tests as outlined herein and providing geotechnical recommendations. The recommendations presented herein are based on the subsurface conditions observed in the boring(s) and the laboratory testing results. Additional subsurface exploration and/or laboratory testing may result in recommendations that may differ to some degree than those presented herein. There is no guarantee or warranty as to the uniformity of subsurface materials and conditions at the subject site. An additional discussion of the limitations of geotechnical engineering is included in Appendix A. As noted in the appendix, this report should be considered valid for 3 years after issuance. Existing Construction and Site Conditions The site is currently a vacant lot. At the time of the investigation the lot was vegetated with a good cover of wild plants and grasses. The ground surface slopes gently to the north. Surficial Geology on the site is mapped as Loess (windblown silt with fine sand and clay) according to "Geologic map of the Arvada quadrangle, Adams, Denver, and Jefferson Counties, Colorado" by R.M. Lindvall, USGS Map GQ -1453, 1979. Bedrock below the upper soil appears to be Denver and Arapahoe Formations of Paleocene and Upper Cretaceous age. A geologic map is shown in Figure 1.1 Proposed Construction Planned construction for the site includes two duplex structures with detached garages. The duplexes are proposed to be two stories over a basement and the garages to be one story with a slab on grade floor. The structures will have reinforced concrete foundations and will be built with wood and/or steel framing and possible veneer materials. Structural loading will be relatively light consistent with the proposed construction, on the order of 300 to 3,000 pounds per linear foot. Site grading will be minimal. An existing site plan is presented on Figure 1.0. If the proposed construction varies significantly from that described above or herein, CG should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations provided in this report as necessary. City of Wheat Ridge Building Division Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 2 Subsurface Investigation The subsurface investigation was performed by drilling three (3) test borings (B-1, B-2, and B-3) on the lot at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1.0. The test borings were drilled on May 18, 2018 using a 4" diameter solid stem auger, powered by a CME -45 drill rig. As noted in the Boring Log, Figure 2.0, samples were obtained using a "modified California" sampler. The samples were obtained by driving the sampler into the subsurface materials at selected depths during drilling. The modified California sampler is a steel barrel sampler with a 2.5 -inch outside diameter and a 2 -inch inside diameter that is fitted with 4 -inch long brass liners during sampling to facilitate retrieval and transport of relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface materials. The sampler was driven into the subsurface materials using a 140 -pound hammer falling through a height of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 12 inches is recorded and provides an indication of the relative density of granular materials and relative consistency of cohesive, fine grained soils. Subsurface Conditions Subsurface conditions encountered in test borings, B-1, B-2, and B-3, are summarized in Table 1 below. A log of the test borings is presented on Figure 2.0. Note: all measurements are approximate based on tools and methods used in the field. Table 1: Subsurface Conditions Summary Boring No. Depth (feet) Soil Description B-1 0-2 Clay, silty, sandy to very sandy, scattered gravel, hard, moist, brown B-2 2-6.5 B-3 0-8 B-1 2-4 Gravel, silty, clayey, moist, brown B-2 0-2 B-1 7 7 -- 30 Sandstone/Claystone bedrock, intermixed and interlayered, very hard, moist, brown, gray, olive B-2 — 20 B-3 8-20 Groundwater encountered during drilling and measurements after drilling are summarized in Table 2 below. Note: all measurements are approximate based on tools and methods used in the field. Table 2: Groundwater Summary city of Wheat Rid9e Building Division Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 3 Boring No. Time Relative to Drilling Groundwater Depth (feet) Caving/Mud Depth (feet) Swell Potential N During drilling dry - B-1 10 minutes after dry open 10,300 3 days after 28 28.6 13.9 During drilling dry - B-2 10 minutes after dry open 112 3 days after 19.8 20 B-2 During drilling dry - B-3 10 minutes after dry open 9 3 days after dry 19.7 Laboratory Test Results Samples obtained during the geotechnical exploration program were returned to our laboratory where the soil descriptions and boring log were reviewed by a senior geotechnical engineer or senior engineering geologist. Selected samples were then tested in the laboratory for moisture content, dry density, and swell -consolidation potential. Results of the laboratory tests are presented next to the boring log in Figure 2.0 and in Table 3 (below) and in Figures 3.0 — 3.9. Table 3: Laboratory Test Results Summary Boring No. Depth (feet) Moisture Content N Dry Density (pcf) Swell Potential N Swell Pressure (psf) Swell Risk B-1 4 12.4 111 4.1 10,300 high B-1 9 13.9 118 -0.2 N/A low B-1 19 19.5 112 1.0 3,200 low B-2 4 10.1 111 2.4 4,700 moderate B-2 9 18.3 111 0.1 1,600 low B-2 14 21.2 106 0.8 4,700 low B-2 19 18.0 106 0.3 1,400 low B-3 4 11.9 106 1.8 2,700 low B-3 9 9.6 113 0.0 N/A low B-3 19 1 15.8 1 113 -0.2 N/A low Discussion of Expansive Soils The amount of volume change that results when a sample of soil or bedrock is inundated with water under a constant pressure is measured in the Denver swell -consolidation test as the swell/expansion or consolidation potential. The swell pressure is the amount of pressure that is then required to compreFF ly of the sample back to the volume before inundation. Wr,eut midge Building Division Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 4 The geotechnical engineering practice in the Colorado Front Range area uses a relative classification to evaluate the expansion potential of soil and bedrock. The expansion potential is categorized as low, moderate, high, or very high based on the swell potential. The following table presents the relative classifications. Additional information regarding risk is presented in Appendix A. Table 4: Summary of Risk Categories Slab Performance Risk Category Representative Percent Swell (500 psf Surcharge) Representative Percent Swell (1000 psf Surcharge) Low 0 to< 3 0 to< 2 Moderate 3 to < 5 2 to < 4 High 5to<8 4to<6 Very High 8 or greater 6 or greater Source: Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers, 1996. Note: The representative percent swell values presented are not necessarily measured values. Rather, they are a judgment of the swell of the soil and bedrock profile likely to influence slab performance. Site Preparation Prior to site grading, areas to be graded should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, debris and other deleterious material. Stripped materials should be wasted off site in accordance with applicable regulations. However, non -hazardous stripped soil with vegetation can be used as shallow fill in non- structural, landscaped areas of the site. All manmade fill or demolition debris should be removed from below the planned foundations and floor slabs, and replaced with properly compacted structural fill. Structural Fill Material: Imported structural fill material should be non -expansive at the recommended placement moisture content and density, classify as a coarse-grained material (sand or gravel) by the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), and have a liquid limit less than 40 and a plasticity index less than 20. Frozen material, ice, snow, cobbles and boulders larger than 3 inches, debris and other deleterious material should be excluded from fill materials. CG should be contacted to test and evaluate whether proposed on-site or imported materials are suitable structural fill. Suitable imported structural materials would be: CDOT Class 5 or 6 road base, CDOT Class 1 Structure Backfill, or a manufactured 'crusher fines' material. Imported materials should be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. Fill Placement: Structural fill should be placed in lifts 8 inches or less in loose thickness, moisture conditioned and compacted to 95 percent or more of the standard Proctor Maximum Dry Density (MDD). Fill which classifies as silt, sand or gravel by the USCS should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percentage points of Optimum Moisture Content (OMC), and fill which classifies as clay by the USCS should be moisture conditioned to within OMC to 4 percentage points above OMC. Fill in non-structural areas should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the MDD. City of Wheat Ridge Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Building Division Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 5 Site Excavation The sandy, silty, clay soils classify as Type B soils per the OSHA Excavation Guide. All excavation slopes are to be laid back per the OSHA Excavation Guide for Type B soils at a maximum 45 -degree angle (1:1 Horizontal to Vertical). The excavations should be performed under the supervision of the contractors `Competent Person' per the OSHA Excavation Guide. The slopes may require to be further laid back if seepage or instability is observed in the foundation excavations. The contractor should manage construction traffic and the placement of excavation spoils to maintain excavation slope stability. If site constraints prevent appropriate excavation sloping, the foundation excavation can be shored using drilled concrete piers. Our office can prepare an excavation shoring design for this project if needed. Foundation Recommendations Due to the potential for significant differential movement for shallow foundations, the safest foundation type for the proposed structures is straight shaft, steel reinforced, concrete piers drilled into the underlying bedrock. The following recommendations should be followed in the design and construction of the foundation system. 1. Piers initiated within 3 feet of the existing ground surface (i.e. garage, porch, and crawlspace levels) should have a minimum length of 18 feet and a minimum bedrock penetration of 6 feet. Piers initiated 8 to 10 feet below the existing ground surface (i.e. basement level) should have a minimum length of 12 feet and a minimum bedrock penetration of 6 feet. All piers shall have a minimum diameter of 12 inches. 2. Piers should be designed for an allowable end bearing pressure of 37,000 psf and a side shear resistance of 2,500 psf for the portion of the pier in bedrock. Side shear resistance should be ignored for the upper 5 feet of the pier shaft and the bottom pier diameter, or 1 foot for a 12 -inch diameter pier. 3. Piers should be reinforced the full length as recommended by the structural engineer. Reinforcing should be adequate to resist an uplift pressure of at least 45,000 pounds per foot of pier diameter. 4. Grade beams between piers should be provided with a minimum 4 -inch void space at the bottom. 5. Pier tops should not be allowed to mushroom. The top of all piers should be formed with cardboard tubes. 6. Caving soils and groundwater were encountered in the test borings shortly after drilling or When ? I �� checked 3 days after drilling. Based on our observations, casing of the pier shafts is not expected, Wheat Ridge Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Building Division Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 6 but dewatering may be required. Concrete should be placed in the caissons immediately after drilling using "drill and pour" techniques to minimize the need for dewatering. 7. Concrete should be placed by the tremie method if more than 3 inches of water is encountered in the bottom of the pier shaft at the time of concrete placement. The tremie pipe should be lowered to the bottom of the pier shaft prior to concrete placement and should be kept below the concrete surface during concrete placement. 8. CG should observe pier drilling and construction. Alternative Basement Foundation Recommendations A spread footing foundation supported on native soils or properly compacted structural fill can be considered to support the proposed structure(s) at the basement elevation only with the entire excavation below the clay stratum and all footing elevations are at this level. Spread Footing Recommendations New foundations should be designed based on an allowable soil bearing pressure of: 3000 psf maximum and 500 psf minimum at a typical basement elevation (about 8 to 10 feet below grade). Additional spread footing foundation design and construction considerations: 1. The total and differential settlements are estimated to be approximately 1 inch or less. 2. Spread footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous footings placed on material as described above, and 24 inches for isolated pads. 3. A minimum 4 -inch void should be used below grade beams if needed to develop the minimum dead load pressure. 4. Footings placed beneath unheated areas should have at least 36 inches of covering soils to protect from frost. This depth should be verified with the local building department. 5. Lateral resistance to the spread footings is based on both friction between the footing and its subsoil and passive earth pressures of the soils on the side of the footing. An ultimate coefficient of friction of 0.35, and a passive pressure based on an equivalent fluid weight of 180 pcf for the soils is recommended. 6. The foundation system should be reinforced to span an unsupported length of 10 feet. 7. It is required that a representative of the Engineer observes the foundation excavation prior to foundation construction and/or fill placement in order to evaluate the possible fill soils. 8. The foundation excavation should be protected from runoff, and multiple wetting and drying cycles. Runoff into the foundation excavation should be avoided. City Of wheo} Pid9e Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 8ui1ain9Divsion Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 7 Foundation 'Walls Foundation walls which are laterally supported and expected to undergo a minimal amount of movement should be designed with based on a lateral "at -rest' earth pressure computed based on an equivalent fluid weight of 60 pcf if the onsite soils are used as backfill. Topsoil should not be used as backfill. The earth pressure can be reduced to 50 pcf for "active" conditions where significant wall deflection can occur, such as at site retaining walls. A passive pressure based on an equivalent fluid weight of 180 pcf for sandy, silty, clay is recommended. These pressures assume drained conditions behind the foundation walls. The buildup of water behind a foundation wall will increase the lateral pressures on the wall. All foundation walls should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as: adjacent buildings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. These pressures assume drained conditions behind the foundation walls. The buildup of water behind a foundation wall will increase the lateral pressures on the wall. Foundation Wall Backfill Placement: In landscape areas, foundation wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90% percent of the standard proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) near the optimum moisture content (OMC). In areas of external and interior flatwork (i.e. sidewalks, driveways, garage slabs), foundation wall backfill should be compacted to at least 95% percent of the standard proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) at or slightly above the optimum moisture content. Floor Slabs The onsite soils are suitable to support slab -on -ground construction, with a low (at basement level) and moderate (at existing grade level) risk of slab heave due to potentially expansive soils. Potential floor slab movement of less than 1" exists at the basement level and 2" to 3" exists on the site near the ground surface, assuming a depth of moisture variation ("depth of wetting") of about 20 feet. Structural floors over a crawlspace or minimum 12 -inch void space should be used if this potential movement is not acceptable to the owner or builder. Slab Design: To reduce the effects of differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints that allow for unrestrained vertical movement. Partitions should not be designed or constructed to bear on slabs supported on grade. A 3 -inch void should be established below or above partitions during construction and monitored and maintained by the owner after construction. The void space can be covered with a molding strip that is not attached to the partition. Joint spacing should be determined on floor thickness, nominal aggregate size, slump, and be consistent with the recognized guidelines such as the Portland Cement Association and the American Concrete Institute. Cracks and movement of the slabs supported on grade can be transmitted through rigid floor coverings. Performance expectations should be taken into consideration in the selection of floor slab coverings. City of Wheat Ridge Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Building Division Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 8 Floor Slab Subgrade: Some areas of soft and/or loose soils may be encountered in the floor slab areas. Some subgrade improvement of these materials may be required at the time of excavation as directed by the engineer. Soft or disturbed soils observed in the excavation should be compacted on grade or removed and replaced with structural fill. Any fill placed below structural areas should consist of granular, non - expansive soil compacted to at least 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) near the optimum moisture content. Plastic Moisture Barrier or Gravel Layer: Based on subsurface conditions observed in the test boring(s) and our understanding of the planned construction, a plastic moisture barrier and 4 -inch gravel layer to protect a slab near the ground surface is optional for this site from a geotechnical standpoint. Applicable building codes may require these items. Interior Plumbing: All plumbing lines should be testing for leaks. Where plumbing lines enter through the slab, positive breaks should be provided. Connections to mechanical equipment should be flexible. Any new fill placed beneath floor slabs should be a non -expansive, granular material compacted to at least 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density near the optimum moisture content. Subsurface Drainage It is recommended that below grade, finished or usable living space be protected from surface water infiltration with a perimeter drain system. The drainage system can be either an interior or exterior type. Details of typical drainage systems are presented in Appendix B. Surface Drainage 1. The following drainage precautions should be observed and maintained at all times during and after construction: 2. Excessive wetting of the foundation excavation and sub -floor soils should be avoided. 3. Exterior backfill should be placed as recommended herein. 4. The ground should be sloped away from the building. A minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 5 to 10 feet in landscaped areas (10%) and 3 inches in 10 feet in paved areas (3%) is recommended. 5. Roof down spouts should discharge well beyond foundation wall backfill zones. 6. Plastic membranes should not be placed adjacent to the foundation walls. A pervious textile should be used to control weed growth. 7. Any settling of foundation or foundation wall backfill should be re -graded to maintain the slopes noted above. City of Wheat Ridge Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Building Division Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 9 Exterior Flatwork The subgrade soils should be scarified and compacted to at least 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density near the optimum moisture content in areas of driveway pavement or approach apron for a garage, if constructed. Proof -rolling of these areas is recommended. Soft and deflecting areas should be removed and replaced with properly compacted fill. Radon Radon may be a potential concern in Colorado. If a crawl space is constructed it should be well ventilated. if a gravel layer is placed beneath the floor slab it can be incorporated into a radon abatement system if this becomes necessary in the future. The local building department should be contacted for more information regarding radon issues in this area. Radon Prevention methods should conform to EPA Radon Mitigation Standards: EPA 402-R-93-078, October 1993 and revised April 1994. Mold Mold can develop in crawl spaces that become damp under certain conditions. If a crawispace is constructed, it should be well ventilated. A vapor barrier should be placed on exposed soil to help control indoor moisture levels and should be sealed at the edges and seams. A professional hygienist should be contacted to address any potential mold concerns and mitigation methods. Refer to A Brief Guide to Mold, Moisture and Your Home for additional information: EPA 402-K-02-003, dated September 2010, for more information. Crawlspace Recommendations (if needed) A health and safety professional with experience in the design of crawlspaces can be consulted to provide recommendations to reduce moisture infiltration into crawlspaces. Such recommendations may include fining the crawispace with polyethylene plastic that is sealed and mechanically attached to the foundation. Plastic should not be attached to the foundation within 6 inches of untreated wood members of the framing or flooring. Also, plastic should not be attached to metal framing members such as column posts, but can be attached to concrete foundations supporting column posts. Limitations and Exclusions This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices using the degree and care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under the same or similar circumstances, and for use by the client for design purposes at the named site. City of Wheat Ridge Building Division Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.: 18-075 7-23-18 Page 10 The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the data obtained from the exploratory boring(s) drilled at the approximate location presented on Figure 1, and the proposed construction. An additional discussion of the limitations of geotechnical engineering practices is presented in Appendix A. An environmental assessment (ESA Phase I or 11) of the site is outside our scope of work for this project. This report should also not be considered as an indication of the absence of or as an evaluation of any potential environmental, geologic or mining hazards for the subject site. If during construction, fill, soil or water conditions appear to be different than that presented in this report, CG should be contacted to reevaluate the recommendations presented herein as necessary. A representative of our office must observe foundation excavations, pier installation, backfill operations, and foundation bearing strata, as applicable, in order to confirm the recommendations of this report. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact our office. Cushman Geoscience LLC Prepared by: Reviewed by: C� LtC-F� UO A 46434 ; 1 David A. Cushman, P.G., CPG Scott Barton, P.E. Engineering Geologist Project Engineer Attachments — Figures 1.0 through 3.9 Appendix A — Important Information about This Report Appendix B — Foundation Drain Details Distribution: digitally stamped PDF via email to addressee, printed copies mailed upon request References Foundations and Earth Structures, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Design Manuals 7.01 and 7.02, 09-01-1986 Guideline for Slab Performance Risk Evaluation and Residential Basement Floor System Recommendations, Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers, 1996. City of CAV/YMA/EMC/DAC/S D B Wheat Ridge Building Division Cushman Geoscience LLC 195 South Hoyt Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 nA NOTES: 1) Not to Scale 2) 19 Indicates location of exploratory test boring. I CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 3300 Ames St SITE PLAN City of PROJECT NO. 18-07 FIGURE NO. Buildidgbi M1 KEY QI [_.GESS (HOLOCENE AND PLEISTOCENE)—Yellowish-brown to - -- light -grayish -brown sanely silt. Upper 2-4 *Pet (03 6-1 2 m) may contain appreciable amounts of clay and silty clay. Exhibits co- lumnar structure: slightly calcareous; slightly sticky when wet. Generally less than 10 feet. (3 m) thick, but may be as much as 20-25 feet ((--7.6 m) thick in northeastern part of quadrangle SITE LOCATION SOURCE: Lindvall, R. M, 1979, Geologic map of the Arvada quadrangle, Adams, Denver, and Jefferson Counties, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ -1453 CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 3300 Ames St PROJECT NO. 18-075' Geologic Map FIGURE NO. 1.1� B-1 B-2 B-3 0 41 126/12 24 121112 5 MC=12,4 mc=10.1 mc=11.9 5— v v DD=111 ..... DD=111 DD=106 -0.24, 5016.5 0.3 750/7 0.0 ..'-1 50/6 —10 MC=13.9 MC=18.3 MC=9.6 10 DD=1 18 DD=111 DD=113 —16 50/3 0.8 :]50/8 :]5015 ..... ...... MC=21.2 is DD=106 ..... 3 ..... 1.0 50/7 0.3 5016 3 > -0.2 -050/7 —20 mc=19.6mc=18.0 mc=15.8 20 ...... DD=112 DD=106 DD=1 13 —25 25- 3 3 —30 50/5 30- 35 36 LEGEND: CLAY, SILTY, SANDY TO VERY SANDY, SCATTERED GRAVEL, HARD, MOIST, BROWN GRAVEL, SILTY, CLAYEY, MOIST, BROWN SANDSTONE/CLAYSTONE BEDROCK, INTERMIXED AND INTERLAYERED, VERY HARD, MOIST, BROWN, GRAY, OLIVE INDICATES A "MODIFIED CALIFORNIA" SAMPLER WAS DRIVEN 26112 INDICATES THAT 26 BLOWS WITH A 140 -POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLER 12 INCHES INTO THE SUBSURFACE SOILS 4.1 t INDICATES AMOUNT OF VOLUME CHANGE (%) AND DIRECTION OF SAMPLE MOVEMENT ON WETTING 3 INDICATES DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER AND NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING WAS OBSERVED 3 --> INDICATES DEPTH AT WHICH BORING CAVED AND NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING OBSERVED MC= INDICATES MOISTURE CONTENT (%) OF SAMPLE DD= INDICATES DRY DENSITY (pct) OF SAMPLE -200= INDICATES AMOUNT OF MATERIAL PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE (%) NOTES: 1) THE BORINGS WERE DRILLED ON MAY 18, 2018 WITH 4 -INCH DIAMETER, SOLID -STEM AUGER POWERED BY A CME -45 DRILLING RIG. 2) THE LOCATIONS OF THE BORINGS WERE DETERMINED APPROXIMATELY IN THE FIELD BY TAPING OR PACING FROM FEATURES ON THE SITE PLAN AND SHOULD ONLY BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO THE DEGREE IMPLIED BY THE METHOD USED. 3) CHANGES BETWEEN MATERIAL TYPES ARE APPROXIMATE AND TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL. GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS MAY VARY SEASONALLYAND FROM YEAR TO City of YEAR DEPENDING ON CLIMATE AND OTHER FACTORS. Wheal Ridge 3300 Ames St PROJECT NO. 18-075 CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE BORING LOGS, LEGEND & NOTES IFIGURE NO. 2.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 E c -1.0 m -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 -6.0 -7.0 -8.0 100 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Sample Description: Clay, silty, sand Boring No. B-1 Moisture Content (%) 12.4 Depth (ft) 4 Dry Density,(pcf) 111 Swell % 4.1 Swell Pressure s 10,300 Yy . CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE --- _ 3300 Ames St 1project No. -075 SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST IFiqure No. 3.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 E c -1.0 as -2.0 E -3.0 Cn -4.0 -5.0 -6.0 -7.0 -8.0 100 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Sample Description: Sandstone Boring No. B-1 Moisture Content (%) 13.9 Depth (ft) 9 Dry Densit , (pco 118 Swell % -0.2 ur Swell Presse s N/A —City whet r( CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 3300 Ames St _ Project No, 18-075 SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST Figure No. 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 0 1.0 0.0Nk - o -1.0 m -2.0 eq -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 -6.0 -7.0 -8.0 100 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Sample Description: Cla stone _ Ui BoringNo. B-1 Moisture Content (%) 19.5 CAW Depth (ft) 19 Dry Densit , (pco 112 Swell % 1.0 Swell Pressure sf) 3,200 CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 3300 Ames St Project No, 13-075 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST Figure No. 3.2 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 -6.0 � I I I I I 11H I I I 1 11111 1 1 _.-L-1 1 1 111 100 Sample Description Boring No. Depth (ft) 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Clay, v. sandy, sil B-2 Moisture Content 4 _ Dry Densit - (pco Swell (%) Swell Pressure (c CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 1 3300 Ames St I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST 10.1 cal. 2.0 E Whecrt > 1.0 0 Iding D; Project No, M Figure No. 3.3 0.0 E m -1.0 co -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 -6.0 � I I I I I 11H I I I 1 11111 1 1 _.-L-1 1 1 111 100 Sample Description Boring No. Depth (ft) 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Clay, v. sandy, sil B-2 Moisture Content 4 _ Dry Densit - (pco Swell (%) Swell Pressure (c CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 1 3300 Ames St I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST 10.1 cal. ill - Whecrt 2.4 4,700 Iding D; Project No, 18-075 Figure No. 3.3 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 0 3.0 aCi 2.0 E 0 1.0 cv 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 -6.0 100 Sample Description Boring No. Depth (ft) 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Sandstone, claystone B-2 Moisture Content 9 Dry Density c Swell Swell Pressure (psf) 18.3 city of 1 1 1 Wheat Rig 0.3 2,400 uilding M% CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 1 3300 Ames St jProject No. 18-075 SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST IFigure No. 3.4 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 A. 0 3.0 2.0 c 1.0 a� 0.0 a -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 -6.0 100 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) or Sample Description: Cla stone, sandstone city Boring No. B-2 Moisture Content°lo} 21.2 Depth (ft) 14 Dry Density c 1106 'ot Rids:` Swell % 0.H IC'j I(1g Div Swell Pressure sf) 4,700 i= CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE3300 _ Ames St Project No. 18-075 E SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST iFigure No. 3.5 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 0 3.0 V' �J W 2.0 E 0 1.0 m CD 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 — -4.0 -5.0 �- -6.0 100 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Sample Description: Cla stone Boring No. B-2 Moisture Content (%) 18.0 W, Depth ft 19 Dry Densit c 106 Swell % 0.3 auiraf,,f, Swell Pressure sf) 1,400 e 3300 Ames St Project No, 18-075 CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST Figure No. 3.6 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 E 0 1.0 0.0 - -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 -6.0 100 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Sample Description: _ Clay, silty, sl. sandy to v. sandy Boring No. B-3 Moisture Content (%) _ 11.9 Depth ft 4 Dry Density c 106 Swell % 1.8 Swell Pressure (psf) 2,700 CUSHMAN GE OSCIENCE 3300 Ames St I Project No SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST IFiclure No. wE,ecat k uildin•n ,.. 18-075 3.7 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 0 3.0 2.0 E c 1.0 ca 0.0 E -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 i -5.0 -6.0 100 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Sample Description: Sandstone, cla stone Boring No. B-3 Moisture Content (%} 9.6 Depth (ft) 9 Dry Density c 113 Swell % 0.0 Swell Pressure (psf) N/A CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE 3300 Ames St IProject No. 18-075 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST I Figure No. 3.8 cion 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 w 2.0 E 0 1.0 a� 0.0 s� -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 -6.0 100 10000 Vertical Pressure (PSF) Sample Description: Sandstone, claystone Boring No. B-3 Moisture Content (%) 15.8 cia' Depth (ft) 19 Dry Density c 113 wheca Swell % -0.2 Swell Pressure sf) N/A ciuildin ; 3300 Ames St Project No. 18-075 CUSHMAN GEOSCIENCE SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST IFigure No. 3.9 cion Appendix A Important Information about this Report The data collected by Cushman Geoscience LLC (CG) during this geotechnical exploration was used to provide geotechnical information and recommendations based on subsurface conditions for the site evaluated, the potential effects of those conditions on the proposed structure, and recommended foundation type for the proposed structure. The stratification lines shown on the boring log(s) are approximate and actual transitions between materials may be more gradual or more rapid than indicated on the boring log(s). Actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction may differ from the subsurface conditions presented herein. This uncertainty can not be eliminated due the variable nature of geologic conditions. Material characteristics and engineering properties of soil and bedrock may vary between samples and between borings. The actual material characteristics and engineering properties of the soil or bedrock may differ from interpretations based on sampled soil and bedrock. Quantitative conclusions prior to construction regarding the geotechnical performance of a structure are not possible due to the potential variability of subsurface conditions. Engineering judgment and experience are used to evaluate the most likely geotechnical performance of the structure and provide geotechnical recommendations for the structure. There are no guaranties or warranties implied or expressed. The owner and client must understand that uncertainties are associated with geotechnical engineering and must determine the level of risk they are willing to accept for the proposed construction. The level of risk can be reduced, but not eliminated by more extensive exploration and sampling of the site and additional laboratory testing, which would cost more money and take more time. To reduce the level of uncertainty, the report should only be used by the referenced client for the referenced project and the construction described in the report unless authorized in writing by CG. CG should be consulted to review changes to the proposed construction such as the nature, size, configuration, orientation, location or weight of proposed improvements. Additionally, the practice of geotechnical engineering is continually developing knowledge and experience, and it must be understood that recommendations are based on the state of the practice at the location and time the report was prepared. The report should not be used more than three years after issuance unless reviewed and revised if needed by CG. The geotechnical engineering practice in the Colorado Front Range area uses a relative classification to evaluate the expansive potential of soils and bedrock. The expansive potential is categorized as low, medium, high or very high based on the swell potential. The following table presents the relative classifications. Table No.1 - Risk Categories Slab Performance Risk Category Representative Percent Swell (500 psf Surcharge) Representative Percent Swell (1000 psf Surcharge) Low 0 to< 3 0 to< 2 Moderate 3 to < 5 2 to < 4 High 5to<8 4to<6 Very High 1 8 or greater I or greater Source: Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers, "Guideline for Slab PerformanceRisk Evaluation and Residential Basement Floor System Recommendations (Denver Metropolitan. rea), December 1996 Wheat Ridge Building Division The slab performance generally associated with the slab performance risk categories are as follows: Appendix A Important Information about this Report Page 2 Low slab cracking, differential movement and heave Moderate slab cracking, differential movement and heave, partial framing void and furnace plenum closure High to Very High large slab cracking, differential movement and heave, closed framing void and furnace plenum Note: More or less damage can occur in any risk category due to the variable nature of soil and bedrock. It is important to note that measured swell or expansion is not the only criteria used in developing foundation and floor recommendations. Other factors considered in the development of foundation and floor recommendations are: a. Soil and bedrock variability, b. Stratigraphy, c. Groundwater depth during field activities and potential groundwater depth after construction, d. Surface water features and site drainage, e. Post construction landscaping and irrigation conditions, f. Construction details and proposed use, and g. Local experience. Landscaping of the site following construction and owner maintenance will greatly affect the performance of structures on sites with expansive soil or bedrock. Typically, moisture contents of subsurface soils and bedrock increase after construction due to surface irrigation and the cut off of evaporation that occurs when a slab or building is constructed. Poor owner maintenance, such as ground surfaces sloping towards foundations or slabs and irrigated landscaping adjacent to buildings, will increase the potential for slab and foundation movement by increasing the potential for moisture content changes in the subsurface soils. The property owner or buyer, and anyone he or she plans to sell the house to, must understand the risks associated with construction in areas with expansive soils and must assume the responsibility for maintenance of the structure and the site. The owner and prospective purchasers should review "A Guide to Swelling Soils for Colorado Homebuyers and Homeowners," a special publication (SP43) of the Colorado Geological Survey, which helps homebuyers and homeowner understand and take measures to reduce the potential for damage due to expansive soils. City or Wheat Ridge ii"Cling Bivisi" TRENCH SHOULD NOT BE DUG BELOW AN IMAGINARY PLANE EXTENDING FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING AT A 45° ANGLE FRAMED WALL GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT REINFORCING STEEL NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT, FRAMING AND STEEL REINFORCING SHOULD BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE REPORT FOR MOISTURE -CONDITIONING AND COMPACTION OR GRAVEL SUB -SLAB DRAIN RECOMMENDATIONS) BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT (SEE REPORT FOR BASEMENT FLOOR RECOMMENDATIONS) /x lti tif•l '* ti• F '' •" A E OE E4C4VATIQbl rrrrrr - * TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES WIDE r R. AND AT HIGH POINT '12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB OR BOTTOM Of: GRADE BEAM IF /// STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS USED. TRENCH SHOULD SLOPE DOWNWARD 1/8 INCH OR MORE PER FOOT FROM HIGH POINT TO A SUMP PIT OR OUTFALL.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED WITH RELATIVELY CL.EAN,GRAVEL WITH 100% FROM THE VERTICAL PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH SIEVE, 10% OR LESS PASSING THE NO. 4 SIEVE AND 3% OR LESS PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD >' BE COVERED WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OR ROOFING FELT. r x n r k ✓ ror r i - PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE 4 OR FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE. TRENCHES IN SILTY SANDS AND NOT TO SCALE r GRAVELS SHOULD BE LINED WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. v Cushman Geoscience INTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - FOOTING FOUNDATION City Wheat I 81jildinq Figure No. Ftca. Int. FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL (SEE MINIMUM SLOPER ' OF GROUND SURFACE) .y< (SEE REPORT FOR FOOTING DESIGN, REINFORCING AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS) • • . 4 < TRENCH SHOULD NOT BE DUG BELOW AN IMAGINARY PLANE EXTENDING FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING AT A 45° ANGLE FRAMED WALL GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT REINFORCING STEEL NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT, FRAMING AND STEEL REINFORCING SHOULD BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE REPORT FOR MOISTURE -CONDITIONING AND COMPACTION OR GRAVEL SUB -SLAB DRAIN RECOMMENDATIONS) BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT (SEE REPORT FOR BASEMENT FLOOR RECOMMENDATIONS) /x lti tif•l '* ti• F '' •" A E OE E4C4VATIQbl rrrrrr - * TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES WIDE r R. AND AT HIGH POINT '12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB OR BOTTOM Of: GRADE BEAM IF /// STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS USED. TRENCH SHOULD SLOPE DOWNWARD 1/8 INCH OR MORE PER FOOT FROM HIGH POINT TO A SUMP PIT OR OUTFALL.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED WITH RELATIVELY CL.EAN,GRAVEL WITH 100% FROM THE VERTICAL PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH SIEVE, 10% OR LESS PASSING THE NO. 4 SIEVE AND 3% OR LESS PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD >' BE COVERED WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OR ROOFING FELT. r x n r k ✓ ror r i - PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE 4 OR FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE. TRENCHES IN SILTY SANDS AND NOT TO SCALE r GRAVELS SHOULD BE LINED WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. v Cushman Geoscience INTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - FOOTING FOUNDATION City Wheat I 81jildinq Figure No. Ftca. Int. FRAMED WALL GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT REINFORCING STEEL NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT, FRAMING AND STEEL REINFORCING SHOULD BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 ` INCHES WIDE AND AT HIGH POINT 12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB OR BOTTOM OF GRADE BEAM IF STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS USED. TRENCH SHOULD SLOPE DOWNWARD 1/8 INCH OR MORE PER FOOT FROM HIGH POINT TO A SUMP PIT OR OUTFALL.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED WITH RELATIVELY CLEAN,GRAVEL WITH 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH SIEVE, 10%ORLESS PASSING THE NO. 4 SIEVE AND 3% OR LESS PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD BE COVERED WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OR ROOFING FELT. I I PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE 40 OR FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE. UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE REPORT FOR MOISTURE - CONDITIONING AND COMPACTION OR GRAVEL SUB -SLAB DRAIN RECOMMENDATIONS) TRENCH SHOULD NOT BE DUG BELOW AN IMAGINARY PLANE EXTENDING FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING AT A 45° ANGLE FROM THE VERTICAL. NOT TO SCALE City 4 f Whe❑t R Building D isia Cushman Geoscience EXTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - FOOTING FOUNDATION Figure No. Fta. Ext. 11 L C .�ti fti f fti EEO �.tiftifyfti , y (SEE REPORT FOR PIER DESIGN, I REINFORCING AND TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES WIDE AND AT FRAMED WALL GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT REINFORCING STEEL NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT, FRAMING AND STEEL REINFORCING SHOULD BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE REPORT FOR MOISTURE -CONDITIONING AND COMPACTION OR GRAVEL SUB -SLAB DRAIN RECOMMENDATIONS) BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT (SEE REPORT FOR BASEMENT FLOOR RECOMMENDATIONS) SLAB -ON -GRADE .�ti fti f fti �.tiftifyfti , y �1 fti . f TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES WIDE AND AT HIGH POINT 12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB OR BOTTOM OF GRADE BEAM IF STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS USED. TRENCH SHOULD SLOPE DOWNWARD 1/8 INCH OR MORE PER FOOT FROM HIGH POINT TO A SUMP PIT OR OUTFALL.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED WITH RELATIVELY CLEAN,GRAVEL WITH 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH <:< SIEVE, 10% ORLESS PASSING THE NO, 4 SIEVE AND 3% OR LESS PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD BE COVERED WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OR ROOFING FELT. ; PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE 40 OR FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE. City of Cushman Geoscience INTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - PIER FOUNDATION Fiqure No. Pier Int. FRAMED WALL PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER GROUND FLOOR SUPPORT AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE - REINFORCING STEEL FOUNDATION ' WALL BACKFILL (SEE MINIMUM SLOPER TRENCHES SHOULD BE LINED WITH 10 -MIL NOTE: FLOOR SUPPORT, . OF GROUND (SEE REPORT FOR FRAMING AND STEEL SURFACE) WATERPROOFING IS APPLIED. REINFORCING SHOULD t> s yi, l s> BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS r> 'c=: ttc }< ^ RECOMMENDATIONS) BASEMENT FLOOR SUPPORT L VOID FORM UNDER (SEE REPORT FOR BASEMENT GRADE BEAM (SEE FLOOR RECOMMENDATIONS) REPORT FOR ----- RECOMMENDATIONS) SLAB -ON -GRADE 'tir rtirtir TRENCH SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES { ti...tid.,. ;:; -E-�_ V I�� I WIDE AND AT HIGH POINT 12 INCHES r r•r•r.r• BELOW TOP OF SLAB OR BOTTOM ® UNDERSLAB FILL (SEE GRADE BEAM IF STRUCTURAL FLOOR IS REPORT FOR MOISTURE - USED. TRENCH SHOULD SLOPE CONDITIONING AND DOWNWARD 1/8 INCH OR MORE PER `': COMPACTION OR GRAVEL FOOT FROM HIGH POINT TO A SUMP PIT SUB -SLAB DRAIN OR OUTFAI_L.TRENCH SHOULD BE FILLED RECOMMENDATIONS) WITH RELATIVELY CLEAN,GRAVEL WITH 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2 INCH SIEVE, 10% ORLESS PASSING THE NO, 4 SIEVE AND 3% OR LESS PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE. GRAVEL SHOULD BE COVERED {` , :y = WITH NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC r l OR ROOFING FELT. PIPE SHOULD BE NOMINAL 4 -INCH DIAMETER AND CONSIST OF PERFORATED SCHEDULE 40 OR FLEXIBLE DRAIN TILE. ^r TRENCHES SHOULD BE LINED WITH 10 -MIL PLASTIC SHEATING THAT IS MECHANICALLY (SEE REPORT FOR ATTACHED TO THE FOUNDATION WALL AFTER PIER DESIGN, WATERPROOFING IS APPLIED. REIFORCING AND CONSTRUCTION SCALE y NOT ' RECOMMENDATIONS) }TO 1 Cushman Geoscience EXTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL - PIER FOUNDATION { City o r' Wheat Ri e buildina F ;t on re No. Pier Ext. City of Date: June 6, 2019 Location: 3316 Ames Street ATTENTION: BUILDING DIVISION SINGLE FA AML YID UPLEX BUILDING P.ERMITAPPLICr47'IOVREY7EW I have reviewed the submitted application documents to construct a New Home - Single Family - Duplex located at the above referenced address. Please note the comments checked below. 1. _/ Drainage: a. Drainage Letter & Plan required: b. Site drainage/grading plan have been reviewed and are: 2. ✓ Public Improvements required & to be completed with project: a. street,paving%patching: ✓ Yes b. curb & gutter: V Yes c. sidewalk: ✓ Yes d. Other (specify): Yes For items not constructed, the amount of funds taken in lieu of construction: —Yes ✓ —✓ OR No NOT O ;refer to stipulations. No Completed -- No Completed — NoCompleted -- N70 Completed 1l 3. ✓_ _ Does all existing roadway/alley R.O.W. meet the standards of the City: ./ yes X70 If not, what is required? If R.O.W. is required, has the deed been received: _ Yes --� No (See Note below) NOTE: All deeds must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 4_ ✓ APPROVED: The Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and hereby approves this Permit Application, subject to the stated requirements and/or attached stipulations. Signature Date�� 5. N/A NOT APPROVED: The Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and does not approve this Permit Application for the stated reason(s):— Signature David F. Brossr P.L.S. Date 6. ✓ Stipulations: Direct roof drain downspouts to protect adjacent properties from storm water runoff. 7. ✓ A Drainage Certification Letter accompanied by As -Built plans from the Engineer, -of -Record shall be required prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, S. NOTE: ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AS A RESULT OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED PER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. Rev 06/2013 City of h6a$ R�je City of Wbeat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'" Ave. 'Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857 NOTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RESTORATION DATED: June 6, 2019 ADDRESS: 3316 Ames Street Dear Contractor: In conjunction with the approval of the building permit application for the above referenced address, this letter is to inform you that all existing public improvements located along the frontage of said address shall be restored, (if damaged from related construction) to an acceptable condition, as determined by City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Department, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to any construction commencing, the City's representative will conduct an onsite inspection to determine the existing condition(s) of the public improvements at this address. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303,235.2864 Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC; File Rev 2108 City of Wh6atRjdge City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'x' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.1857 PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES Date: June 6, 2019 Location of Construction: 3316 Ames Street Purpose of Construction: New Home - Single Family - Duplex Single Family ✓ Commercial Multi -Family -- -_ Development Review Processing Fee: .. ............................................ $100.00 $__ 100.00 (Required of all projects for document processing) Single F"N Residence/Duplex Review Fee:. .................................... $50.00 $ 50.00 Commercial/Multi-Famih, Review Fees: (Fees include reviews of the 11 and 2n° submittals) • Review of existing or minimal technical documents: ...... ................. $200.00 $ • Initial review' of technical civil engineering documents: .......... $ • Traffic Impact Study Review Fee : ................................... .......... ....... $600.00 $ • Trip Generation Study Review Fee: .................................................. $200.00 $ • Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) Review Fee: ....................... $200.00 $ • O & M Schedule Review & SMA Recording Fee ............................. $100.00 $ • Construction Control Plan................................................................. $100.00 $ ' Each Application will be reviewed by staff once and returned for changes. If after review of the second submittal changes requested by staff have not been fully made to the civil/stormwater/traMc documents, further reviews will be subject to the following Rembn*Ul Fees: • Resubmittal. Fees: 31 submittal (% initial review fee): .............................................. ..... $300.00 S 4" submittal (full initial review fee) .................................................. $600.00 $ Allsubsequent submittals:... .............................................................. $600A0 X = $ (Full initial review fee) - - - TOTAL REVIEil4Y FEE+ (due at time of Building Permit issuance): 150, D0 PLEASE NOTE THAT IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE FEES, THERE WILL BE LICENSING AND PERMITTING FEES REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Rev 05.+79 Static Pressure and Friction Rate Job: 3316 Ames St ILII I Date: 05/22/2019 Entire House By: Dakota Groves Ultimate Heating & Cooling •�}- 20 (� 0 I O q-� 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 t� Project• • For: Feaster Realty 3316 Ames Street, W heatridge, CO 80212 Available Static Pressure Total Effective Length Heating Cooling (in H2O) (in H2O) External static pressure 0.90 0.90 Pressurelosses 33 27 Coil 0.25 0.25 Heatexchanger 0 0 Supply diffusers 0.02 0.02 Return grilles 0.03 0.03 Filter 0.10 0.10 Humidifier 0 0 Balancing damper 0 0 Other device 0 0 Available static pressure 0.50 0.50 Total Effective Length Supply Ducts Return Ducts Friction Rate Heating (in/100ft) 0.062 OK 0.062 OK Cooling (in/100ft) 0.062 OK 0.062 OK Fitting Equivalent LengthDetails Supply 4G=80, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 2A2=55, 12H1=20, 1 F1=120: TotalEL=365 Return 6G=30, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 6C6=115, 6CB=25, 6CA=10, 6CA=10, 6CA=10, 5N=55, 6CA=10: TotalEL=325 - - wrightsott, 2019 -Ailey 22 14: 8:45 Comfort Bulder by W rightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1 1'1VU11 ...St Duplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Rigk).rup Calc= MJ8 Frond Door faces: W Supply Return (ft) (ft) Measured length of run -out 35 24 Measured length of trunk 33 27 Equivalent length of fittings 365 325 Total length 433 376 Total effective length 808 Supply Ducts Return Ducts Friction Rate Heating (in/100ft) 0.062 OK 0.062 OK Cooling (in/100ft) 0.062 OK 0.062 OK Fitting Equivalent LengthDetails Supply 4G=80, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 2A2=55, 12H1=20, 1 F1=120: TotalEL=365 Return 6G=30, 8A7=30, 8A7=30, 6C6=115, 6CB=25, 6CA=10, 6CA=10, 6CA=10, 5N=55, 6CA=10: TotalEL=325 - - wrightsott, 2019 -Ailey 22 14: 8:45 Comfort Bulder by W rightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1 1'1VU11 ...St Duplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Rigk).rup Calc= MJ8 Frond Door faces: W Supply Trunk Detail Table Name Trunk Htg Clg Design Veloc Diam H x W Duct Stud/Joist Opening (in) Name Type (cfm) (cfm) FR (fpm) (in) (in) Material Trunk st1A PeakAVF 432 378 0.062 647 13.6 8 x 12 ShtMetl st1 st2 PeakAVF 424 491 0.070 737 11.4 8 x 12 ShtMetl 157 st1 PeakAVF 743 716 0.062 669 13.6 8 x 20 ShtMetl Ox 0 Name Grille Size (in) Htg (cfm) Clg (cfm) TEL (ft) Design FR Veloc (fpm) Diam (in) H x W (in) Stud/Joist Opening (in) Duct Matl Trunk rb2 Ox 0 182 213 153.8 0.151 611 8.0 Ox 0 ShMt rt1 rb1 Ox 0 161 184 132.8 0.175 527 8.0 Ox 0 ShMt rt1 rb4 Ox 0 194 157 206.5 0.112 556 8.0 Ox 0 ShMt rt1 rb6 Ox 0 212 122 240.5 0.097 609 8.0 Ox 0 ShMt rt1 rb5 Ox 0 157 168 375.5 0.062 480 8.0 Ox 0 ShMt rt1 rb7 Ox 0 171 232 184.8 0.126 666 8.0 Ox 0 ShMt rt1 rb3 Ox 0 158 159 89.8 0.259 593 7.0 Ox 0 ShMt rt1 Name Trunk Type Htg (cfm) Clg (cfm) Design FR Veloc (fpm) Diam (in) H x W (in) Duct Material Trunk rt1 PeakAVF 1235 1235 0.062 741 16.4 10 x 24 ShtMetl - - wrightsoft" 2019 -May -2214:38:45 Comfort Bolder by Wrightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 2 St DLiplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Rigq).np Calc= MJ8 Frort Door faces: W Duct System Summary Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 Project • • For: Feaster Realty 3316 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212 :1: Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves Cooling Heating External static pressure 0.90 in H2O Pressure losses 0.40 in H2O Available static pressure 0.50 in H2O Supply/ return available pressure 0.268 / 0.232 in H2O Lowest fiction rate 0.062 in/100ft Actual airflow 1235 dm Total effective length (TEL) st1 A Bed :1: Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves Cooling 0.90 in H2O 0.40 in H2O 0.50 in H2O 0.268 / 0.232 in H2O 0.062 i n/100ft 1235 do Name Design (Btuh) Htg (cfm) Clg (cfm) Design FR Diam (in) H x W (in) Duct Mad Actual Ln (ft) Ftg.Egv Ln (ft) Trunk Bath 1 h 628 30 16 0.068 5.0 Ox 0 ShMt 49.8 345.0 st1 A Bed c 1289 78 84 0.062 6.0 0x0 ShMt 67.8 365.0 st1A Bed 2 h 1918 93 69 0.070 7.0 Ox 0 ShMt 58.3 325.0 SO Bed -A C 1289 78 84 0.070 6.0 Ox 0 ShMt 57.0 325.0 st1A Dining h 2010 97 79 0.090 6.0 Ox 0 ShMt 41.8 255.0 st1A Dining -A h 2010 97 79 0.081 6.0 Ox 0 ShMt 42.5 290.0 st1A Fut Bath h 174 8 0 0.162 2.1 8x4 ShMt 25.5 140.0 st1 A Fu Room 1 h 1022 49 36 0.090 5.0 Ox 0 ShMt 18.0 280.0 st2 Fart Room 2 h 868 42 36 0.079 5.0 Ox 0 ShMt 41.0 300.0 st1 A Kitchen C 1192 70 78 0.097 6.0 Ox 0 ShMt 31.5 245.0 st1 LkAng c 1639 91 107 0.094 7.0 Ox 0 ShMt 21.0 265.0 st2 Living -A c 1639 91 107 0.095 7.0 Ox 0 ShMt 16.3 265.0 SO Living -B c 1639 91 107 0.108 7.0 Ox 0 ShMt 13.3 235.0 st2 M Bath h 1393 67 27 0.092 6.0 Ox 0 ShMt 31.8 260.0 M Bed C 1786 85 116 0.070 7.0 Ox 0 ShMt 38.8 345.0 st2 M Bed -A C 1786 85 116 0.080 7.0 Ox 0 ShMt 29.3 305.0 st2 TC h 462 22 9 0.073 4.0 Ox 0 ShMt 36.8 330.0 st2 UriBsmt c 1322 58 86 0.096 6.0 Ox 0 ShMt 24.0 255.0 st1 w►rightsoft, 201g%ay-221C�8:45 Comfort BulderbyWrigMsoft18.0.32RSU27046 J\�`Page 1 XON. ...St Dlplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg IZgll).rLpi Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W Q� N BSMT 7" 7„ 7" 4=41, 7 " Mec Fut Room 1 5" 12x8 611 8" 7" � tE / 8',!7, p ,1 Adj Bldg 6" Unf Bsmt S13IrE20x8 24x10 6" -730 4YF7 tl (=8*' � 11 411 Q it 19= 5„ Fut �+tl ii Fut P 12x8 6" 6,1 6" Job#: 3316 Ames St Ultimate Heating & Cooling Scale:1 :75 Performed by Dakota Groves for: Page 3 Feaster Realty 4971 Monaco St. Comfort Builder by Wrightsoft 3316Ames Str6et Commerce Ct, CO 80022 18.0.32 RSU27046 Wheatridge, CO 80212 2019-May422 14:38:54 6AmesSt (Mrth BUg Rght)rup 0i_ - Entry Level T Job#: 3316 Ames St Performed by Dakota Groves for: Feaster Realty 3316 Ames Street Wheatridge, CO 80212 Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St. Commerce Cily, CO 80071 11 0 Scale:11A Page 2 Comfort Builder by Wrightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 2019 -May -2214:38:54 .6Ames St (INbrth Bld g Right)rup N Second Story i i 7„ 7" M Bed 7rc 4' 811 M Bath Laundry M CIO Adj Bldg Stair2 Hall Bed 2 711--- 8" 8" Bed Bath 1 6" 8,r 1 1 Job#: 3316 Ames St Ultimate Heating & Cooling Scale:1 :75 Performed by Dakota Groves for: Page 1 Feaster Realty 4971 Masco St. Comfort Builder by Wrightsoft 3316Ames Street Commerce Cit, CO 80022 18.0.32 RSU27046 Wheatridge, CO 80212 2019 -May -2214:38:53 ... 6AmesSt "rth Bldg Right)rup Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves 1 Room name Stair2 Hall 2 Exposed wall O ft O ft 3 Room height 10.0 ft heat/000l 10.0 It heaUcool 4 Room dimensions 4.0 x 12.3 ft 1.0 x 117.8 It 5 Room area 49.0 ft' 117.8 ft Ty Construction Ll -value Or HTM Area (ft) Load Area (fly) Load number (Btuh/fV-°F) (Btu or or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) I or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross NiP/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basementvtll,light 0.065 a 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0, 0 W Frame wall, M ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, droutr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Door, M sc type 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W G2 Basement wall, light 0.065 s 1.20 0.00 G 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 glazing, droutr, 0.320 5 23.36 15.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 gla2ing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, M ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2glazinq,droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basementwall, light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Frame wall, vd ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sc type 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Attic ceiling,aspha 0:021 1.50 0.97 49 49 74 47 118 118 177 114 F Below grade floor, ) 0.007 0.54 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 c) AED excursion -9 -22 Envelope loss/gain 74 38 177 92 12 a) Infiltration 0 0 0 0 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains: Ocaipants@ 2300 0 0 0 Applianoes/other 0 0 Subtotal (lines 6to13) 74 38 177 92 Less extemalload 0 00 0 Less transfer 0 0 p 0 Redtal 70 3 0 g0 14 Sub 0 00 e 15 Dud loads -0% 0% 0 0 -0% 0°/ 0 `=_> 0 Total room load 0 0'p z0. Airrequired (dm) 01 0 0 0 Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. vvwitslC�fSt 2019 -May -2214:38:43 Aft" " ' Comfort Bdlder by W rightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 11 St Duplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Right).rup Calc =MJ8 Front Door faces: W Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves 1 Room name M CIO Laundry 2 Exposed wall O ft O ft 3 Room height 10.0 It heat/cool 10.0 It heattcool 4 Room dimensions 5.5 x 10.3 ft 4.0 x 6.8 ft 5 Room area 56A ft' 27.0 ft? Ty Construction U -value Or HTM Area (fl) Load Area W) Load number (Btuh/ft -°F) (Btu or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basement wall, light 0.065 a 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 G 2 glazing, or ouir, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sctype 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basement wall, light 0.065 s 120 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24azing,droulr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, vdext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazinq, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basementwall,light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 glazing, or outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t2 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sctype 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Atticceiling,aspha 0.021 1.50 0.97 56 56 85 55 27 27 41 26 F Belowgrade f oor,1 0.007 0.54 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 c) AED excursion -11 -102 Envelope loss/gain 85 44 41 -76 12 a) Infiltration 0 0 0 0 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains: Occupants @ 230 0 0 0 0 Applianoes/other 0 500 Subtotal (lines 6 to 13) 85 44 41 424 Less edemalload 0 0 0 0 Lesstransfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution -85 -44 -41 -424 14 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 15 Dudloads -0% 0% 0 0 -0% 0% 0 0 Total room load 00 0 0 Air required (dm) 0 0 0 0 Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. AC:CAP -VW wr9lgislc-0 - 2019 -May -2214:38:43 Comfort Builder by W rightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 10 St Duplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Right).np Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By Dakota Groves 1 Room name TC MBed 2 Exposed wall 4.3 ft 25.3 ft 3 Room height 10.0 ft heat/cool 10.0 ft heat/000l 4 Room dimensions 6.5 x 4.3 ft 1.0 x 227.9 ft 5 Room area 27.6 1`12 227.9 tt= Ty Construction U -value Or HTM Area (ftp) Load Area (ft) Load number (Btuh/ft'--°F) (Btuh&) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basement wall, light 0.065 a 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 WFrame wall, wd ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 198 139 604 154 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 5 0 117 172 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 54 0 1261 1860 1 1 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, vd sctype 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basement wall, tight 0-065 s 1.20 0-00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23-36 1525' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 43 39 168 43 55 55 240 61 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 4 2 93 53 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 qlazinq, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basementwall,light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tD2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, droutr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sctype 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Atticoeiting, aspha 0.021 1.50 0.97 28 28' 41 27 228 228 342 221 F Below grade floor,) 0.007 0.54 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 c) AED excursion -2 89 Envelope loss/gain 303 121 2565 2557 12 a) Infiltration 147 17 872 101 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Intemal gains: Occupants @ 2300 0 2 460 Appliancestother 0 0 Subtotal (lines 6to 13) 450 138 3437 3118 Less extemalload 0 0 0 0 Lesstransfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution 12 6 100 455 14 Subtotal462 145 3537 3573 15 Ductloads -0% 0% 0 0 0°/ 0% 0 0 Total room load j1 462 145 3537 3573 Air required (dm) 22 9 171 „ 232 Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. ;x,.,,tr+,ng pgv`sion A arvrigFstolt" Comfort BtDlder by Wrightsoft 18 2019 -May -2214:38:43 .0.32 RSU27046 Page 9 St DuplexesN3316 Ames St (North Bldg Right).rup Calc= MJ8 Frond Door faces: W Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By: Dakota Groves 1 Room name Bed 2 M Bath 2 Exposed wall 13.0 It 12.8 ft 3 Room height 10.0 ft heat/cool 10.0 it heat/cool 4 Room dimensions 1.0 x 143.6 ft 6.5 x 12.8 ft 5 Room area 143.6 ft' 82.9 ft Ty Constudion Ll -value Or HTM Area (IF) Load Area (ft') Load number (Btuh/ft-°F) (BWh/ft') or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basement wall, light 0.065 a 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sctvpe 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basementwall,light 0.065 s 1.20 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -G 2glaazing,droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr o&, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, vA ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 130 100 436 111 128 116 504 128 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 6 6 140 62 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 6 3 140 80 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazinq, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 30 7 701 469 0 0 0 0 W Basementwall, light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sc type 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Atticosiling,aspha 0.021 1.50 0.97 144 144 216 139 83 83 124 80 F Below grade floor,) 0.007 0.54 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 c) AED excursion -3 -3 Envelope loss/gain 1353 716 909 348 12 a) Infiltration 449 52 441 51 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains: Ooaipants@ 230 1 230 0 0 Applianoes/other 01 0 Subtotal (lines 6to 13) 1802 998 1349 399 Less extemalload 0 0 0 0 Less transfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution 116 60 44 23 14 Subtotal 1918 1058 1393 422 15 Ductloads -0%10%1 0 0 -0% 0%1 0 0 ITTotal room load 1918 1058 1393 422 Air required (dm) 93 69 67 27 Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. -AW wrigtst:WCWM ° 2019 -May -22 14:38:43 " ComfortBulder by WrigFrtsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 8 St Drplexest.3316 Ames St (North Bldg Riglt).rup Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By: Dakota Groves 1 Room name Bath 1 Bed 2 Exposed val I 5.8 ft 27.3 It 3 Room height 10.0 ft heat/000l 10.0 ft heat/000l 4 Room dimensions 5.8 x 9.3 It 1.0 x 177.5 It 5 Room area 53.2 ft2 177.5 fF Ty Construction U -value Or HTM Area (IF) Load Area (ftp) Load number (Btuh/f6--°F) (Btuh/fF) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basementwall, light 0.065 a 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, v`d ext, 0.060 a 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Door, vA sctype 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'W 1-G Basementwall, light 0.065 s 1.20 0.00 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0' 0 2 glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t -G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, M ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 133 133 578 147 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 qlazinq, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basementwall, light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 58 55 240 61 140 98 428 109 �G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 3 0 58 86 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 42 0 981 1447 D Door, vd 9c type 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Attic ceiling, aspha 0.021 150 0.97 53 53 80 52 178 178 267 172 F Below grade floor,) 0.007 0.54 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 c) AED excursion 2 336 Envelope loss/gain 378 201 2253 2210 12 a) Infiltration 199 23 942 109 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains. Occupants@ 230 0 0 1 230 Appliances/other 0 0 Subtotal (lines 6 to 13) 577 224 3195 2550 Less external load 0 0 0 0 Less transfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution 51 27 53 27 14 Subtotal 628 251 3248 2577 15 Duct loads -0% 0% 0 0 -0% 0% Total room load 628 251 324idcj-� 2577 Air required (dm) 30 16 1 168 Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. gxjtic9tn9atvfts`o� wrl 0 St D lexes\331 r..,,,..,.., Comfort Bdlder by W righ[soft 18.0.32 RSU27046 2019 -May -2214:38:43 AZZ�Page 7 up 6AmesSt(NorthBldgf2ight).rup Calc =MJB Front Door faces: W Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves 1 Room name Kitchen Stair 1 2 Exposed wall 18.5 ft 0 It 3 Room height 10.0 ft heat/000l 10.0 ft heat/000l 4 Room dimensions 1.0 x 295.3 It 4.3 x 15.3 ft 5 Room area 295.3 it64.8 fF Ty Construction U -value Or HTM Area (fl=) Load Area (ft=) Load number (Btuh/f -°F) (Btu or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) or perimeter (ft) (Bluh) Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool Gross NIP/S Heat Cool 6 W Basement well, light 0.065 a 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 G 2 glazing, dr out', 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, M sctype 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basementwall,light 0.065 s 1.20 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E22 glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, vd ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 185 185 807 206 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr out-, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr out', 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, or out', 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2glazinq,droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basementvtep,light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, M ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t2 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, M sctype 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Atticceiling,aspha 0.021 1.50 0.97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F Belowgrade loor, 1 0.007 0.54 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 c) AED excursion -288 0 Envelope loss/gain 807 -82 0 0 12 a) Infiltration 639 74 0 0 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains. Occupants@ 230 0 0 0 0 Applianceslother 1200 0 Subtotal (lines 6to 13) 1446 1192 0 0 Less external load 0 0 0 0 Less transfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution 0 0 0 0 14 Subtotal 1446 11920 0 15 Ductloads -0% 0% 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 FFTotal room load 1446 1192 0 0 Airrequired(cfm) 70 78 0 0 Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. -VII-1- wrl,Rtit:wcwt- 2019 -May -2214:38:43 AMA Comfort Builder by W rigtisoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 6 St Dtplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg IZght).np Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves 1 Room name Living Dining 2 Exposed wall 38.3 ft 31.5 ft 3 Room height 10.0 ft heat/000l 10.0 ft heat/cool 4 Room dimensions 19.8 x 18.5 ft 1.0 x 203.4 ft 5 Room area 365.4 ft2 203.4 ft2 Ty Construction U -value Or HTM Area OF) Load Area Load number (Btufflh°F) (Btuh/fF) or perimeter (ft) (B h) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basementwall, light 0.065 a 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 198 78 338 86 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LG 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 96 0 2243 3306 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sctype 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 24 24 561 181 0 0 0 0 w Basementwall, light 0.065 s 1.20 0.00' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [-j 2 glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.25 0 0 q 0' 0 0 0 0 -G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 W Frame wall, vd ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 185 165 720 183 118 102 443 113 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 20 11 467 267 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 16 9 374 214 2glazinq,droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w Basementwall,light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00' 01 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, v„d ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 198 132 574 146 G 2 glazing, or out, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 42 0 981 1447 D Door, wd sctype 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 24 24 561 181 c Attic ceiling, aspha 0.021 1.50 0.97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F Belowgrade floor, 1 0.007 0.54 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 c) AED excursion -161 193 Envelope losstgain 4328 3864 2932 2293 12 a) Infiltration 1322 153 1088 126 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains: Occupants @ 230 0 0 0 0 Appliances/other 900 0 Subtotal (lines 6 to 13) 5650 4917 4021 2420 Less external load 0 0 0 0 Less transfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution 0 0 0 0 14 Subtotal 5650 4917 4021 2420 15 Ducdloads -0% 0% 0 0 -0% 0%1 0 t 0 Total room load 5650 49171 4021 2420 Air required (clm) 273 320 194 -4 `57 Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. tawrrg Qt`"sion ro �nvr-'�gtsoFle" 2019 -May -2214:38:43 AftKSt D lexes\3316 Ames Comfort B rilder by Wrightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 5 St (North Bldg Rig1t).np Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W Right -M Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves 1 Room name Stair B Pwdr 2 Exposed wall O ft O ft 3 Room height 9.0 ft heat/cool 10.0 ft heaU000l 4 Room dimensions 4.0 x 14.3 ft 4.3 x 8.0 ft 5 Room area 57.0 ft' 34.0 fV Ty Construction U -value Or HTM Area (ft) Load Area (ftp) Load number (Btuhlft -°F) (Btu or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basementwall, light 0.065 a 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sctype 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Basement wall, light 0.065 s 1.20 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IW 2 glazing, dr oto', 0.320 s 23.36 15.25 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 } --G L -G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazinq, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basement wall, light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, Mext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1� 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sctype 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Afficgeiling,aspha 0.021 1.50 0.97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F Below grade floor,) 0.007 0.54 0.00 57 57 31 0 0 0 0 0 6 c) AED excursion 0 0 Envelope loss/gain 31 0 0 0 12 a) Infiltration 0 0 0 0 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains: Occupants @ 230 00 0 0 Applianc�s/other 0 0 Subtotal (lines 6to 13) 31 0 0 0 Less extemalload 0 0 0 0 Lesstransfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution -31 0 0 0 14 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 15 Ductloads -0% 0% 0 0 -0% 0% 0 0 Total room load 00 0 0 Air required (dm) 0 0 0 0 Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. -v'd- wrlgF t:wcv t- 2019 -May -2214:38:43 Comfort BUlder by Wrightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 4 StDrplexesl3316Ames St (North Bldg Rgtt).rup Calc =MJ8 Frort Door faces: W Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves 1 Room name Fut Room 2 Unf Bsmt 2 Exposed well 25.5 It 20.5 It 3 Room height 9.0 It heaU000l 9.0 It heaU000l 4 Room dimensions 11.8 x 13.8 It 1.0 x 373.9 It 5 Room area 161.6 ft' 373.9 ft' Ty Construction Ll -value Or HTM Area (fi) Load Area (ftp) Load number (Btuh/W-°F) (Btuh/ft) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross NiP/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basementwall, light 0.065 e 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Door, wd sctype 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basement wall, light 0.065 s 120 0.00 124 104 125 0 185 153 177 0 2glazing,droutr, 0.320 s 2336 15.25 0 0 0 0 32 9 748 488 E ---L-2 2 glazing, droutr, 0320 s 23.36 1525 20 5 467 305 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazinq, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basement wall, light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00 106 106 189 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 glazing, or outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t2 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sc We 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Attic oeiling,aspha 0.021 1.50 0.97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F Belowgrade floor, 1 0.007 0.54 0.00 162 162 87 0 374 374 201 0 6 c) AED excursion 23 -66 Envelope losstgain 868 328 1126 422 12 a) Infiltration 0 0 0 0 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains: Occupants @ 230 0 0 0 0 Appliancsslother 230 900 Subtotal (lines 6to 13) 868 558 1126 1322 Less external load 0 0 0 0 Less transfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution 0 0 85 0 14 Subtotal 868 558 1211 1322 15 Duct loads -0% 0% 0 0 -0% 0% 0 0 TAirTotal room load 868 558 1211 1322 required (dm) 42 36 58 86 Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. `T wrlgtscscrPt 2019 -May -22" Comfort Builder by Wrigh[soft 18 14:38:43 AZZK.0.32 RSU27046 Page 3 St Diplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Right).rup Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves 1 Room name Medi Fut Room 1 2 Exposed wall 7.0 ft 27.3 It 3 Room height 9.0 ft heat/000l 9.0 ft heat/cool 4 Room dimensions 7.0 x 14.5 ft 12.8 x 14.5 ft 5 Room area 101.5 ft' 184.9 ft' Ty Construction Ll -value Or HTM Area (ft') Load Area (ft) Load number (Btuh/ft'--T) (BUNT) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross NIP/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basementwall,light 0.065 a 1.78 0.00 63 53 112 0 115 115 205 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sc tvpe 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basementwall,light 0.065 s 1.20 0.00 0 0 0 0 131 111 137 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 0 0 0 0 20 5 467 305 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G N2 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazinq, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Basement wall, light 0.065 w 1.78 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, wd ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 glazing, droutr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t2 G 2 glazing, droutr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Door, wd sctype 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Atlicoeiling,aspha 0.021 1.50 0.97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F Belowgradefloor, I 0.007 0.54 0.00 102 102 55 0 185 185 100 0 61 c) AED excursion 01 23 Enelope loss/gain 167 0 909 328 12 a) Infiltration 0 0 0 0 b) Room wntilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains: Occupants@ 230 0 0 0 0 Applianoes/other 0 230 Subtotal (lines 6 to 13) 167 0 909 558 Less extemal load 0 0 0 0 Less transfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution -167 0 113 0 14 Subtotal 0 0 1022 558 15 Dudloads -0% 0% 0 0 -0% 0% 0 0 ITTonal room load -T 0 0 1022 558 Air required(dm) 0 0 49 36 Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. -44- wripht CwM- 2019 -May -2214:38:43 Comfort Builder by WrigFtsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 2 St Drplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Right).rrp Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W Right -J® Worksheet Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves 1 Room name Entire House Fut Bath 2 Exposed wall 264.8 ft 8.0 ft 3 Room height 9.7 ft d 9.0 ft heat/cool 4 Room dimensions 8.0 x 10.5 ft 5 Room area 2888.4 fF 84.0 fE Ty Construction U -value Or HTM Area (ft) Load Area ( ) Load number (Btuh/fF-°F) (BtuhM) or perimeter ft () ( Btuh ) or perimeter (ft) (Btuh) Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool Gross N/P/S Heat Cool 6 W Basementwall; light 0.065 e 1.78 0.00 178 178 317 0 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, M ext, 0.060 e 4.36 1.11 395 216 942 240 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, cir outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 5 0 117 172 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 54 0 1261 1860 0 0 0 0 11G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 e 23.36 34.44 96 0 2243 3306 0 0 0 0 D Door, vd sctype 0.320 e 23.36 7.55 24 24 561 181 0 0 0 0 W Basemerrtwall,light 0.065 s 1.20 0.00 439 367 439 0 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 32 18 748 488 0 0 0 0 L -G 2glazing, droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 1525 40 22 934 610 0 0 0 0 W Frame wall, M ext, 0.060 s 4.36 1.11 975 893 3896 993 0 0 0 0 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 10.30 6 12 140 62 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 4 4 93 53 0 0 0 0 rGG2 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 6 7 140 80 0 0 0 0 2glazing,droutr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 20 22 467 267 0 0 0 0 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 13.37 16 18 374 214 0 0 0 0 2 glazinq, dr outr, 0.320 s 23.36 15.62 30 13 701 469 0 0 0 0 W Basement wall, light 0.065 w 1.78' 0.00 178 178 317 0 72 72 128 0 W Frame wall, M ext, 0.060 w 4.36 1.11 395 285 1241 316 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, or outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 3 0 58 86 0 0 0 0 G 2 glazing, dr outr, 0.320 w 23.36 34.44 84 0 1962 2893 0 0 0 0 D Door, vd sctype 0.320 w 23.36 7.55 24 24 561 181 0 0 0 0 C Atdcceif ng, aspha 0.021' 150 0.97 963 963 1446 933' 0 0 0 0 F Belowgrade floor, l 0.007 0.54 0.00 963 963 519 0 84 84 45 0 6 c) AED excursion 0 0 Envelope loss/gain 19478 13406 174 0 12 a) Infiltration 6099 707 0 0 b) Room ventilation 0 0 0 0 13 Internal gains: Occupants@ 230 4 920 0 0 Appliances/other 3960 0 Subtotal (lines 6 to 13) 25577 18993 174 0 Less external load 0 0 0 0 Less transfer 0 0 0 0 Redistribution 0 0 0 0 14 Subtotal 25577 18993 174 0 15 Dudloads 0% 0% 0 0 -0% 0% 0 0 Total room load 25577 18993 174 0 Air required (dm) 12351 123518 0 Calculations approved byACCAto meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. - ..�•.� r ; • t w ` r ` ighsf°�- 2019 -May -22 14:38:43 " t " oComfortBUlderbyWrigltsoft18.0.32RSU27046 Pagel St DLrplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg lZgnt).rrp Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W Pro ect Summar/ J ' l Job: Date: 05/2 Ames St 05/22/2019 Entire House By. Dakota Groves Ultimate Heating & Cooling 91 'F 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 Project Information For: Feaster Realty 3316 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212 Notes: Modeled to comply with 2012 IECC. Heat loss assumed RH 30% at 701. Ventilation modeled compliance with ASHRAE 62.2-2010. Design Information Weather: Denver Stapleton Int'I AP, CO, US Winter Design Conditions Summer Design Conditions Outside db -3 'F Outside db 91 'F Inside db 70 'F Inside db 75 'F Design TD 73 'F Design TD 16 °F Daily range H Relative humidity 50 % Moisture difference -34 gr/Ib Heating Summary Sensible Cooling Equipment Load Sizing Structure 25577 Btuh Structure 18993 Btuh Ducts 0 Btuh Ducts 0 Btuh Central vent (59 cfm) 3893 Btuh Central vent (59 cf -n) 842 Btuh Outside air Outside air Humidification 3696 Btuh Blower 1707 Btuh Piping 0 Btuh Equipment load 33165 Btuh Use manufacturer's data y Rate/swing multiplier Equipment load 1.00 21542 Btuh Infiltration sensible Method Simplified Latent Cooling Equipment Load Sizing Construction quality Semi -tight Fireplaces 1 (Tight) Structure -127 Btuh Ducts 0 Btuh Central vent (59 cfm) -1105 Btuh Heating Cooling Outside air Area (ft) 2888 2888 Equipment latent load 0 Btuh Volume (ft) 19769 19769 Air changes/hour 0.28 0.15 Equipment Total Load (Sen+Lat) 21542 Btuh Equiv. AVF (cfm) 92 49 Req. total capacity at 1.00 SHR 1.8 ton Heating Equipment Summary Cooling Equipment Summary Make Carrier Make Carrier Trade Carrier Comfort 92 Single -Stag... Trade CARRIER Model 59SC2C060S17-16 Cond 24ABB330ABN3 AHRI ref Coil CNPVP3617ALA AHRI ref Efficiency 92.1 AFUE Efficiency 11.0 EER, 13 SEER Heating input 60000 Btuh Sensible cooling 24840 Btuh Heating output 49680 Btuh Latent cooling 0 Btuh Temperature rise 44 'F Total cooling 24840 Btuh Actual airflow 1235 cfm Actual airflow 1235 cfm Airflowfactor 0.048 cfm/Btuh Airflowfactor 0.065 cfm/Btuh Static pressure 0.90 in H2O Static pressure 0.90 in H2O Space thermostat Load sensible heat ratio 1.00 Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. wrightmoR" 2019 -May -22 14:38:43 ZbkComfortBulder by Wrightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1 St DLlexes�,3316 Ames St (North Bldg RigFi).rup Calc= MJ8 Front Door faces: W 2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, s dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated (SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (1 ft window ht, 1.5 ft w sep.); 7 ft head ht all 2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, s dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, clr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated (SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (5 ft window ht, 1.5 ft sep.); 7 ft head ht Doors 6 0.320 0 23.4 140 10.3 62 3 0.320 0 23.4 58 34.4 86 9 0.320 0 23.4 199 17.4 148 30 0.320 0 23.4 701 15.6 469 Door, wd sc type e 24 0.320 w 24 0.320 all 48 0.320 Ceilings Attic ceiling, asphalt shingles roof mat, r-49 ceil ins, 1/2" gypsum board int 963 0.021 fnsh Floors Below grade floor, light dry soil, 9' depth 963 0.007 0 23.4 561 7.55 181 0 23.4 561 7.55 181 0 23.4 1121 7.55 362 49.0 1.50 1446 0.97 933 0 0.54 519 0 0 City of Wheat itid9e • 'on wrightSk19-May-2214:38A3 ComfortBolder by WrigMsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 2 +`*� ...St Drplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg RigFt).r p Calc= MJ8 Frord Door faces: W Component Constructions Job: Date: 3316 Ames St 05/22/2019 Entire House By: Dakota Groves Ultimate Heating & Cooling Relative humidity (%) Cooling 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 For: Feaster Realty 3316 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212 Location: Denver Stapleton Intl AP, CO, US Elevation: 5285 ft Latitude: 40'N Outdoor. Heating Dry bulb (°F) -3 Daily range (°F) - Wet bulb (°F) - Wind speed (mph) 20.0 Heating Indoor. 70 Indoor temperature (°F) 73 Design TD (°F) 30 Relative humidity (%) Cooling Moisture difference (gr/lb) 91 Infiltration: 27 ( H ) Method 60 Construction quality 7.5 Fireplaces Heating Cooling 70 75 73 16 30 50 35.2 -33.5 Simplified Semi -tight 1 (Tight) Construction descriptions Or Area U -value Insul R Htg HTM Loss Clg HTM Gain 0.320 0 ft' Btu[Vtk F ft''FBtuh BluWt' Btuh BtuWt' Btuh Walls 140 13.4 80 20 0.320 0 23.4 467 Basement wall, light dry soil, 2'x6" wood int frm, concrete wall, r-19 cav ins, e 178 0.024 19.0 1.78 317 0 0 8" thk, 5/8" gypsum board int fnsh s 367 0.024 19.0 1.20 439 0 0 0 W 178 0.024 19.0 1.78 317 0 0 1962 all 722 0.024 19.0 1.49 1073 0 0 Frame wall, wd ext, 3/8" wood shth, r-20 cav ins, 1/2" gypsum board int a 216 0.060 20.0 4.36 942 1.11 240 fnsh, 2'x6" wood frm, 16" o.c. stud s 893 0.060 20.0 4.36 3896 1.11 993 23.4 W 285 0.060 20.0 4.36 1241 1.11 316 15.2 all 1394 0.060 20.0 4.36 6080 1.11 1549 Partitions (none) Windows 2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, e dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated s (SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (2 ft window ht, 1.5 ft s sep.); 7 ft head ht s s all 2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, e dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated (SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (6 ft window ht, 1.5 ft W sep.); 7 ft head ht all 2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, e dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated (SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (8 ft window ht, 1.5 ft sep.); 7 ft head ht 2 glazing, dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk: 2 glazing, s dr outr, air gas, wd frm mat, dr innr, 1/4" gap, 1/4" thk; NFRC rated (SHGC=0.40); 50% drapes, medium; 1 ft overhang (4 ft window ht, 1.5 ft s sep.); 7 ft head ht all 5 0.320 0 23.4 117 34.4 172 4 0.320 0 23.4 93 13.4 53 6 0.320 0 23.4 140 13.4 80 20 0.320 0 23.4 467 13.4 267 16 0.320 0 23.4 374 13.4 214 51 0.320 0 23.4 1191 15.4 787 54 0.320 0 23.4 1261 34.4 1860 84 0.320 0 23.4 1962 34.4 2893 138 0.320 0 23.4 3224 34.4 4753 96 0.320 0 23.4 2243 34.4 3306 32 0.320 0 23.4 748 15.2 488 40 0.320 0 23.4 934 15.2 610 72 0.320 0 23.4 1682 15.2 1098 * wrightsoft- 2019 -May -2214:38:43 Comfort Btilder by Wrigfisoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1 St DLplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Rigtt).rlp Calc= MJ8 Frort Door faces: W Building Analysis Job: 3316 Ames St Entire House Date: By. 05/22/2019 Dakota Groves Ultimate Heating & Cooling Indoor temperature (°F) 70 4971 Monaco St, Commerce City, CO 80022 Project • • For: Feaster Realty 3316 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212 ]p_sinn Cnnditic Location: Btuh/ftz Indoor: Heating Cooling Denver Stapleton Int'I AP, CO, US 7154 Indoor temperature (°F) 70 75 Elevation: 5285 ft 27.9 Design TD (°F) 73 16 Latitude: 40°N Ceilings Relative humidity (%) 30 50 Outdoor: Heating Cooling Moisture difference (gr/Ib) 35.2 -33.5 Dry bulb (°F) -3 91 Infiltration: Ducts Daily range (°F) - 27 ( H ) Method Simplified 0 Wet bulb (°F) - 60 Construction quality Semi -tight 11.1 Wind speed (mph) 20.0 7.5 Fireplaces 1 (Tight) Adjustments Heating Component Btuh/ftz Btuh %of load Walls 3.4 7154 21.6 Glazing 23.4 9239 27.9 Doors 23.4 1121 3.4 Ceilings 1.5 1446 4.4 Floors 0.5 519 1.6 Infiltration 3.5 6099 18.4 Ducts 0 0 Piping 0 0 Humidification 3696 11.1 Ventilation 3893 11.7 Adjustments 0 Total 331651 100.0 Cooling Component Btuh/ft' Btuh % of load Walls 0.7 1549 7.2 Glazing 26.7 10561 49.0 Doors 7.6 362 1.7 Ceilings 1.0 933 4.3 Floors 0 0 0 Infiltration 0.4 707 3.3 Ducts 0 0 Ventilation 842 3.9 Internal gains 4880 22.7 Blower 1707 7.9 Adjustments 0 Total 21542 100.0 Latent Cooling Load = 0 Btuh Overall U -value = 0.060 Btuh/ft2- 'F Data entries checked. w Glazinc Glazing Wa Humidification Ventilation Infiltration Other Ceilings Doors Ventilation nternal Gains I\ Infiltration Ceilings Other W heat Rid9� R�il�r3i`°t3 p�vs�p Ary wrightsvft- 2019 -May -22 14:38:43 Comfort Builder byWrightsoft18.0.32RSU27046 Pagel ACC*k St Duplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Right).rup Calc= MJ8 Frond Door faces: W M Bath 83 1393 422 67 27 TC 28 462 145 22 9 M Bed 228 3537 3573 171 232 M CIO 56 0 0 0 0 Laundry 27 0 0 0 0 Stair 2 49 0 0 0 0 Hall 118 0 0 0 0 Entire House d 2888 25577 18993 1235 1235 Other equip loads 7588 2549 Equip. @ 1.00 RSM 21542 Latent cooling 0 TOTALS ' 2888 ' 33165 ' 21542 ' 1235 ' 1235 Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8thEd. +� wrightsoft`" 2019 -May -2214:38:43 �'►� M,.a.rwn,. u a ,www Comfort Bolder by W rigfisoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 2 ...St Diplexes\.3316 Ames St (North Bldg Rigtt).rup Calc= MJ8 Frort Door faces: W Load Short Form Entire House Ultimate Heating & Cooling 4971 Monaco St., Commerce City, CO 80022 Project • • For: Feaster Realty 3316 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212 Job: 3316 Ames St Date: 05/22/2019 By. Dakota Groves Design Information Htg Clg Infiltration Outside db (°F) -3 91 Method Simplified Inside db (°F) 70 75 Construction quality Semi -tight Design TD (°F) 73 16 Fireplaces 1 (Tight) Daily range - H Inside humidity (%) 30 50 Moisture difference (grAb) 35 -34 HEATING EQUIPMENT Make Carrier Carrier Trade Carrier Comfort 92 Single -Stag... Model 59SC2C060S17--16 24ABB330ABN3 AHRI ref CNPVP3617ALA Efficiency 92.1 AFUE Heating input 60000 Heating output 49680 Temperature rise 44 Actual airflow 1235 Air flow factor 0.048 Static pressure 0.90 Space thermostat 36 COOLING EQUIPMENT Make Carrier Trade CARRIER Cond 24ABB330ABN3 Coil CNPVP3617ALA 11.0 EER, 13 SEER 24840 AHRI ref 0 Efficiency Btuh Sensible cooling Btuh Latent cooling °F Total cooling cfm Actual airflow cfmBtuh Airflowfactor in H2O Static pressure 0 Load sensible heat ratio 11.0 EER, 13 SEER 24840 Btuh 0 Btuh 24840 Btuh 1235 cfi n 0.065 cfmBtuh 0.90 in H2O 1.00 102 ROOM NAME Area (ftz) Htg load (Btuh) Clg load (Btuh) Htg AVF (cfm) Clg AVF (cfm) Fut Bath 84 174 0 8 0 M ech 102 0 0 0 0 Fut Room 1 185 1022 558 49 36 Fut Room 2 162 868 558 42 36 Unf Bsmt 374 1211 1322 58 86 Stair B 57 0 0 0 0 Pwdr 34 0 0 0 0 Living 365 5650 4917 273 320 Dining 203 4021 2420 194 157 Kitchen 295 1446 1192 70 78 Stair 1 65 0 0 0 0 Bath 1 53 628 251 30 16 Bed 178 3248 2577 157 168 P-4') 1AA 1n10 1nGQ n1i �C-mot nn rT v i v I - .7J U.7 Calculations approved byACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. wlp al Ridge wrlghtsoft° �Ua19-Ma,yM 14:38:43 Comfort BUlder by Wrightsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page 1 St Duplexes\3316 Ames St (North Bldg Rigft).rLp Calc= MJ8 Frond Door faces: W Manual S Compliance Report Report Job: Date: 3316 Ames St 05/22/2019 Entire House By. Dakota Groves Ultimate Heating & Cooling Latent gain: 0 4971 Monaca St, Commerce City, CO 80022 For: Design Conditions Feaster Realty 3316 Ames Street, Wheatridge, CO 80212 Outdoor design DB: 90.8°F Sensible gain: 21542 Btuh Outdoor design WB: 60.1 °F Latent gain: 0 Btuh Indoor design DB: 75.0°F Total gain: 21542 Btuh Indoor RH: 50% Estimated airflow: 1235 cfrn Manufacturer's Performance Data at Actual Design Conditions Equipmenttype: SplitAC Manufacturer: Carrier Model: 24ABB330ABN3+CNPVP3617ALA Actual airflow: 1235 cfm Sensible capacity: 24840 Btuh 115% of load Latent capacity: 0 Btuh 0% of load Total capacity: 24840 Btuh 115% of load SHR: Ok% Design Conditions Outdoor design DB: -3.0°F Heat loss: 33165 Btuh Indoor design DB: 70.0°F Manufacturer's Performance Data at Actual Design Conditions Equipment type: Gas furnace Manufacturer: Carrier Model: 59SC2CO60S17-16 Actual airflow: 1235 cfm Output capacity: 49680 Btuh 150% of load Meets all requirements ofACCA Manual S. Entering coil DB: 77.3°F Entering coil WB-. 62.1'F Entering coil DB: 66.5°F Temp. rise: 51 °F 1 "*" wriFgltltsof - 2019 -May -2214:38:43 a� •, � ComfortBulder by W rigMsoft 18.0.32 RSU27046 Page l ...StDLplexes\3316Ames St (North Bldg RigM)np Calc =MJ8 Frort Door faces: W City Of W heat -Midge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P:303.235.2846 F:303.235.2857 January 25, 2019 OFFICIAL ADDRESS NOTIFICATION NOTIFICATION is hereby given that the following address has been assigned to the property/properties as indicated below: NEW ADDRESS: 3300, 3308, 3316, 3324 Ames Street CURRENT ADDRESS: Vacant Lot • Subdivision: Columbia Heights Resub of Blk 5, Lot 10 and 11, Tract/Key AB, Section Parcel # 39-251-12-009 NOTES: This is a courtesy notification. This addressing is preliminary noticing for water and sanitation taps and electric meters only. AUTHORIZED BY: DATE: DISTRIBUTION: 1. Property Owner 2. Applicant 3. Xcel Energy, sandra.cardenas(&xcelenergy.com 4. Wheat Ridge Water District 5. Wheat Ridge Sanitation District 6. Wheat Ridge Building Division 7. Log File NOTE: Please notify all other parties concerned. ADDRESS MAP UPDATED BY: DATE: www.d.wheatridge.co.us Vicinity Map 3300AA,1ES STREET. WNFAT ROW. OOLORADOOM12 UYr510 AND 11JOGETHER WITH THE WEST tf3 OF THE VACATED AUZY AWOOMO SAGO LOTS. A AMOCIVOOM OF OL= 5 OF OOLW W IA "COM, =PM OF JAN. STATE OF OQ MjWO / w � -yr• �____ _• _ as rte• aain � i�ann+wn sFu» A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number: a n_ ❑ No one available for inspection: Time i AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Y'e� No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http✓/www. ci. wheatridge. co. uslinspection Date. �Inspector DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE Liadm7s7rec7 Retrotec rCloud Quality Assurance Report Single Direction Multi Point Blower Door Test PASS Your Result: 1.84 ACH50 (854.47 CFM50 * 60 / 27921 ft) Target < 4 ACH50 Test Information Test Name Test Date Export id Company Name Technician Name Technician Email Building Information Address City State Zip/postal Code Country Year Constructed Elevation Address Verified? Building Latitude, Longitude GPS validation Estimated Distance From Address Test Equipment Fan Model Fan Serial Number Pressure Gauge Model Gauge Serial Number Environmental Conditions Pre-test Indoor Temperature Pre-test Outdoor Temperature Wind Speed Average Barometric Pressure Test Dimensions Conditioned Floor Area Envelope Area Volume 1 3016 Ames St 2020-05-05 10:04 AM (MDT) CKLUQGLB Ultimate Heating & Cooling Kyle Massler kyle@uhcdenver.com 3316 Ames St Wheat Ridge CO 80212 United States 2020 5466 ft Yes 39.764153, -105.054406 Latitude/Lonaitude: 39.764160. -105.054281: Accuracy: 16 ft 27 ft Retrotec 1000/2000 1FN002062 Retrotec DM32 10A 402271 73 OF 48 OF 0 MPH 102.6 kPa 2888 ftZ 2559 ftz 27921 W rreitroL"{� Test Results Summary Test Type Flow Reference Pressure Time Averaging Corrected Flow Air Changes Per Hour Percent Uncertainty Correlation Intercept Slope Test Results Test Data Set 1 Flow Direction Gauge Location Retrotec rCloud Single Direction Multi Point Blower Door Test 50 Pa 10 seconds 854.47 CFM @ 50 Pa 1.836 0.2% 1.000 59.750 0.680 Depressurize Inside Baseline Pressure, Initial (Pa) 0 -0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baseline Duration 15 seconds Average baseline -0.01 Pa Measured Pressure (Pa) -15.1 -23.07 -30.78 -37.71 Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - C8] (Pa) 22.12 39.31 58.02 75.99 Flow (CFM) 373.38 499.02 608.21 698.34 Measured Pressure (Pa) -45.17 -52.33 -59.75 Fan Pressure [1000/2000 - C8] (Pa) 96.8 117.94 140.46 Flow (CFM) 791.24 876.87 961.05 Baseline Pressure, Final (Pa) -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.6 -0.8 Baseline Duration 16 seconds Average baseline -0.57 Pa r-re tra�' Test Notes No notes entered. Flow Equation Parameters - Factory Default Retrotec rCloud Fan Model Retrotec 1000/2000 Fan Serial Number 1 FN002062 Flow equation parameters - B1 Units Used For Flow Parameters in Equation CFM Fan pressure (FP) is the measured fan pressure when using a self -referenced fan or when the room pressure is negative. If using a fan which is not self -referenced, and the room pressure is positive, fan pressure is calculated by subtracting the measured room pressure from the absolute value of the fan pressure. If PrA is greater than 0 or fan is self -referencing: FP = jPrBj - PrA If PrA is less than 0 or fan is self -referencing: FP = PrB Flow calculations are not valid if fan pressure is less than either MF or (K2 x IRPJ) FP = ran pressure, Kr = room pressure Range N K K1 K2 K3 K4 MF Open 0.5214 519.6183 -0.0700 0.8000 -0.1150 1 8.6 A 0.5030 264.9959 -0.0750 1.0000 0.0000 1 12 B 0.5000 174.8824 0.0000 0.3000 0.0000 1 10 C8 0.5000 78.5000 -0.0200 0.5000 0.0160 1 10 C6 0.5050 61.3000 0.0540 0.5000 0.0040 1 10 C4 0.5077 42.0000 0.0090 0.5000 0.0005 1 10 C2 0.5200 22.0000 0.1100 0.5000 -0.0010 1 10 C1 0.5410 11.9239 0.1300 0.4000 0.0014 1 10 L4 0.4800 4.0995 0.0030 1.0000 0.0004 1 10 L2 0.5020 2.0678 0.0000 0.5000 0.0001 1 10 L1 0.4925 1.1614 0.1000 0.5000 0.0001 1 10 flow =(FP -RPxK1)nx(K+K3x FP) x K4 3