Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-04-19City of Wheat�ide PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting April 4, 2019 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair OHM at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29`" Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commission Members Present: Melissa Antol Daniel Larson Janet Leo Scott Ohm Richard Peterson Jahi Simbai Vivian Vos Commission Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager Scott Cutler, Planner II Mark Westberg, Engineering Projects Manager Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner LARSON and seconded by Commissioner LEO to approve the order of the agenda. Motion passed 7-0. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — March 21, 2019 It was moved by Commissioner VOS and seconded by Commissioner LARSON to approve the minutes of March 21, 2019, as amended. Motion carried 7-0. 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) Planning Commission Minutes _ 1 April 4, 2019 No one wished to speak at this time. 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. WS -18-06: An application filed by Toll Southwest, LLC for approval of a major subdivision for a 200 -unit townhome development for property zoned Mixed Use -Commercial TOD (MU -C TOD) and located at 5060 Ward Road. Ms. Mikulak gave a short presentation regarding the major subdivision and the application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated the public notice requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Commissioner PETERSON asked about the arched parcel boundary to the east which is also zoned MU -C TOD zoning. Ms. Mikulak explained that before RTD purchased the land for their parking lot, the old Jolly Rancher Factory had included all of the land zoned MU -C TOD and they had a railroad spur that came into the property where the arch is. She explained that the zoning was changed on the property in 2012, before RTD had finished their property negotiations. Transit stations and parking lots are permitted in MU -C TOD and a Special Use permit in I -E so when the split zoning does not affect the land use, it is not changed or cleaned up. Commissioner PETERSON asked if the open space park ends at Union Ct. Ms. Mikulak said the park will terminate at a detached sidewalk on Union which can then be taken south to the Wheat Ridge • Ward Station area and eventually with 2E funds a pedestrian bridge will be built over the station and connect it to a Linear Park that will continue to the ponds around I-70. Commissioner PETERSON also inquired if the 37,000 sq. ft. of designated parkland is enough to accommodate the new residents and the public. Ms. Mikulak explained that the codified parkland dedication requirement uses an industry standard of 7.5 acres per 1,000 people and because this property is 13 acres there will be a fee in lieu of parkland dedication in addition to the proposed 3/ -acre park because it does not entirely fulfill the parkland requirement. Commissioner PETERSON asked about the curvilinear street design and wanted to ensure that there would be logical wayfinding and addressing particularly where Vivian St. and 51st Ave. intersect twice. Ms. Mikulak mentioned that the address plan has not been looked at yet, but will be once the location of the front doors of the townhomes is known. This will be Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 4, 2- Apri14, 2019 done in conjunction with fire and police in mind so they easily know where to go in an emergency situation. She also explained there are disconnect streets throughout the City and the sequencing of number is done per block; so the numbering will be logical east and west of Vivian St. Commissioner PETERSON then asked what the percentage of total covered land area will be and what is required for permeable surfaces. Ms. Mikulak explained that she does not have an answer for impervious surfaces because it's related to the site plan, but the zoning requires 15% open space and that will be exceeded and the two detention vaults will be sufficient to accommodate all the flows. Commissioner SIMBAI referenced page 5 of the staff report and asked for clarification on the statement that the lots "appear" to be shaped and sized appropriately. Ms. Mikulak explained the subdivision regulations require a logical lot layout which needs to be consistent with the proposed site design so it does not need to be re -platted. Commissioner ANTOL asked what the distance is to the nearest park from this development. Ms. Mikulak mentioned that the Van Bibber Trail is to the north; the Haskins Ridge project, to the east in Arvada, will have a park and Prospect Park is to the south off of 44th Ave. Commissioner LARSON asked why the ROW dedication on Ward and Ridge Roads is different compared to 52nd Ave. Mr. Westberg explained the dedication varies because of differences in what is going to be built and differences in what right-of-way widths are already existing. Commissioners LARSON, PETERSON, ANTOL, VOS and LEO asked about traffic and about the three intersections at Ward Rd (at Ridge, 51 St, and 52nd) and asked if there will be additional traffic lights installed. Ms. Mikulak and Mr. Westberg said the City would like to see a signal at Ridge and Ward Roads, but CDOT has not agreed to that because of the spacing requirements of traffic lights on State Highways. They also mentioned that CDOT is going to require that 51St Ave be designed as a right in and right out only at Ward Rd. Mr. Westberg also added that CDOT has required the City to modify the access at Ridge Rd to a three quarter movement, so there will be a right in, a right out and a left in, but no left out at Ridge Rd. CDOT required this because Ridge Road was previously a low volume dead end street, but now connects through to Planning Commission Minutes -3 - April 4, 2019 the north and east of the station area. He reiterated that CDOT has said no traffic signal at Ridge Road and CDOT has the jurisdiction to tell the City what can and can't be done on the State Highway. Commissioner PETERSON then asked what other travel options will be, specifically to get to I-70. Mr. Westberg explained that one option would be to go to 52nd and turn left and the second option is to take Tabor south to the I-70 Frontage Road and take that to Ward Rd which is also signalized. Commissioner VOS wanted clarification about the Parkland Dedication and the "reduced fee" of $2,021.62 per unit. Ms. Mikulak explained how the parkland dedication and fee amounts are calculated and codified in the subdivision regulations. Ms. Mikulak then explained there are several fee classifications—the standard fee, and slightly reduced fees for properties that are in urban renewal area, in a transit area, or for senior housing. Ms. Vos also asked if this development will be done in phases and asked about infrastructure costs. Ms. Mikulak confirmed this development will be done in phases and the SIA will memorialize the timing of such and what infrastructure has to be in place before ending and starting phases. She did not know what the cost of the infrastructure will be. Commissioner LEO wanted to confirm that there was no community outreach and that there were no issues or objections. Ms. Mikulak confirmed this to be true, and added that there is no neighborhood meeting requirement for a subdivision plat. Prior to this meeting the posting requirement were met and the City received one inquiry, but no objections. She clarified the neighborhood meeting requirement for the concept plan, an associated application, and general outreach the City had done for 2E infrastructure projects. Commissioner OHM asked what percentage of single use residential is for this project. Ms. Mikulak said she doesn't know the percentage, but 200 of 201 lots is residential, the ROW dedication is 3.5 acres, and the parks are .75 of an acre and the rest is residential. Tom Beyer, Business/Property Owner 12200 Ridge Road, Wheat Ridge Planning Commission Minutes -4- April 4 - April 4, 2019 Mr. Beyer had 3 concerns: he wants to understand if there would be sufficient parking for the number of units and if parking waivers would be given. His second concern is what the access to Ridge Road will look like and if there will be on street parking on Ridge Road. Mr. Beyer's third concern is the no left turn out of the site or from Ridge Road to Ward Road. Fred Orr, Property Owner 5040 Acoma Street, Denver Mr. Orr said he owns the two industrial buildings to the north of the property and would like the sewer infrastructure accommodated to have a gravity flow instead of it being lifted to 52nd Avenue. Sean Baker, Property Owner 5040 Ward Road Mr. Baker has concerns about people cutting through his property to turn left onto Ward Road to avoid the no left turn from Ridge Road. He explained this happened to him when Jolly Rancher was in business. Answers to public testimony: • Parking space requirement Ms. Mikulak explained that the parking design is a site planning issue and that there are minimum and maximum parking requirements, and she confirmed that no waivers are given. She also said the internal ROW dedications and the ROW dedication on the north side of Ridge Road will provide 94 on -street spaces. There will also be off-street parking with garages attached to the townhomes. Mr. Westberg added there will be no parking added to the south side of Ridge Road and it will remain a bike lane until those properties decide to redevelop. • RV parking on the streets Ms. Mikulak said the City Code only allows for operable and licensed RV's to be parked on City Streets for no more than a two week period. Matt Foran, Applicant 2753 E 139 Dr.. Thornton Mr. Foran mentioned the HOA documents were not finalized, but does not think that RV parking is going to be an issue. Sewer line around 52nd Avenue Planning Commission Minutes -5- April 5 - April 4, 2019 Mr. Westberg said staff will talk to the developers and Fruitdale Sanitation to see if the request can be accommodated. Gravity is typically preferable to lift stations. Tom Odle, CVL, Applicant's Engineer 10333 E Dry Creek Road Mr. Odle explained there will be a sanitary sewer line adjacent to the Toll Brothers property that the Mr. Orr's parcel can tap into it. Commissioner PETERSON asked if there will be visitor parking on the site. Ms. Mikulak explained some of the tracts will accommodate parking and all interior streets will also allow on -street parking. Commissioner VOS asked how the no left turns will be enforced. Ms. Mikulak said by City signs and curbing installed at the City's expense. Commissioner LEO asked if the businesses will be allowed to turn left off their properties. Mr. Westberg said yes unless CDOT decides to build a median on Ward Road. Commissioner PETERSON asked if Tabor Road can handle truck traffic if there is no left turns onto Ward Road. Mr. Westberg explained that Tabor Road was improved a few years ago and is now a wider two lane road with a bike lane and sidewalks and can accommodate trucks. It was moved by Commissioner LEO and seconded by Commissioner PETERSON to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WS -18-06, a request for approval of a major subdivision plat on property zoned Mixed Use - Commercial (MU -C) and located at the 5060 Ward Road, for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the subdivision regulations (Article IV) of the zoning and development code have been met. 2. All agencies can provide services to the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. With the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a development covenant prior to recordation of the subdivision plat and subsequently into a subdivision improvement agreement. Planning Commission Minutes -6- April 6 - April 4, 2019 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement and shall provide homeowner's association covenants for review and approval by staff. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay the required fees -in -lieu of parkland dedication. Motion carried 7-0. B. Case Nos. WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26: An application filed by Ames Partners, LLC for approval of a zone change from Residential -Three (R-3) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) with approval of an Outline Development Plan (ODP) and Specific Development Plan (SDP) for development of two duplexes located at the northeast corner of W. 33`d Avenue and Ames Street. Mr. Cutler gave a short presentation regarding the zone change, Specific Development Plan and the application. He entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. He stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Commissioner PETERSON commented on page 6, #4, letter C and explained the condition has not been met and does not need to be. Commissioner VOS asked if the R-3 designation does not permit the configuration of duplexes the applicant wants without applying for multiple variances. Mr. Cutler agreed and added that if the applicant stays with the R-3 zoning they could put 5 attached townhomes on the site. Ms. Mikulak added that the City is prohibited in processing lot size variances to add additional units. Commissioner OHM asked if the landscape plan meets the streetscape standards. Mr. Cutler explained that the Street Scape Manual requires 4 street trees per street frontage and the applicant is going to be required to build a wider attached sidewalk with current ADA ramps at the corner. Commissioner OHM also asked if sight distance triangles are a requirement on the landscape plan. Mr. Cutler said there is no sight distance triangle for this landscape plan because the distance would be 15 ft. x 15 ft. and is not even close for these local streets. Commissioner VOS mentioned a sign-up sheet not being included in her agenda packet. Planning Commission Minutes -7- April '7 - April 4, 2019 Jay Feaster, Applicant 19510 West 55t' Place, Golden Mr. Feaster did not have anything to add to the presentation. Commissioner PETERSON asked how the duplexes will be owned. Mr. Feaster said each door will be sold individually. Commissioner SIMBAI asked why batten siding had been chosen for the duplexes. Mr. Feaster said it is durable and will give more of a cottage look which stucco would not even though it is durable as well. Batten will also complement the neighborhood. Commissioner LARSON asked if there is enough room for in the private alley for cars to get in and out of. He also wondered if there will be on street parking. Jessie Donovan, Engineer 3253 N Gaylord Street, Denver Mr. Donovan explained that the City requires a 5 -foot pull out at the end of the alley for the last unit to have enough room to back out of the garage and drive away. He added there will be on street parking as well. Commissioner VOS asked that if this zone change is approved, can the applicant sell the property and a more dense building be built. Mr. Cutler said that is not a possibility. He explained that once the ODP is approved the zoning will be established for the property which will limit the property to only single family homes or a duplex development. He added that the ODP is meant to show the development standards and the SDP provided the specific standards, for example, showing exactly where the buildings will be placed. Commissioner LEO said she has a concern that duplexes can be non -owner occupied. Mr. Feaster said that of the 45 duplexes he has built and sold he has yet to see a loan that has not been an owner occupied loan. Ms. Mikulak added that City Code and Federal Fair Housing laws would not allow the City to regulate if the duplexes are owner or renter occupied. Planning Commission Minutes -8- April g - April 4, 2019 Commissioner OHM asked what the two fences on the north and south are for and why they extend out beyond the line of the building. Mr. Feaster and Mr. Donovan said they are privacy fences and they extend to maximize the visual space between the units. Commissioner OHM asked about the 4.5 -foot sidewalk on the east side of the garages and didn't think that is not a normal width for a sidewalk. Mr. Donovan explained that it is not a sidewalk but an approach to the garages with a slight slope from the alley and is considered a driveway apron. Commissioner PETERSON asked if there is any requirements for permeable patios and walkways. Mr. Cutler said there are requirements for open space on properties and the code for duplexes requires 25% of the lot be open space. He explained the applicant is proposing 42% of the lot be pervious, so they are well exceeding the requirement. Mr. Westberg added that permeable pavers are allowed as part of a water quality treatment, but this property has a separate water quality facility so the pavers are not required. Commissioner LARSON asked if the units will have basements. Mr. Feaster said there will be unfinished basements with 9 foot ceilings and egress windows. Tom Sunheim 5601 West 35th Avenue Mr. Sunheim is happy with what is being proposed for this site and thinks it will be a good fit for the neighborhood. Commissioner VOS said she appreciates the less density, architecture and the character of the project. It was moved by Commissioner LARSON and seconded by Commissioner PETERSON to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-18-25, a request for approval of a zone change from Residential -Three (R-3) to Planned Residential Development with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) for property located at the northeast corner of W. 33rd Avenue and Ames Street, for the following reasons: Planning Commission Minutes -9- April 9 - April 4, 2019 1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed zoning is consistent with the intent of a planned development, compatible with surrounding land uses, and will result in a high-quality development. 4. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request. With the following condition: 1. The minimum lot area shall be revised to 8,425 square feet. Motion carried 7-0. It was moved by Commissioner ANTOL and seconded by Commissioner SIMBAI to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WS -18-26, a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan on property located at the northeast corner of West 33rd Avenue and Ames Street, for the following reasons: 1. The specific development plan is consistent with the purpose of a planned development, as stated in Section 26-301 of the City Code. 2. The specific development plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the outline development plan. 3. The proposed uses are consistent with those approved by the outline development plan. 4. All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. 5. The specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the outline development plan and with the City's adopted codes and policies. Motion carried 7-0. C. Case No. WZ-18-23: An application filed by Regency Centers for approval of a Master Sign Plan for Applewood Village Shopping Center on property zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD) at the northeast corner of the property located at 3210-3600 Youngfield Street. Mr. Cutler gave a short presentation regarding the Master Sign Plan and the application. He entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. He stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Planning Commission Minutes _10 - April 10 - April 4, 2019 Commissioner PETERSON asked about the illumination of signs with regards to LED lighting/lightbulbs. He also asked if changing signs are allowed. Ms. Mikulak and Mr. Cutler explained that the LED is referring to electronic message centers such as a monitor or video screens. They said it will be subject to the Code's illumination standards which were recently adopted and there will be meters to monitor the illumination's brightness. Mr. Cutler also explained there is limitations on how the screens change and there is an 8 second transition time which is an industry standard and there will be no animation or scrolling signs, only instant change. Commissioner PETERSON also asked if there will be plastic box signs. Mr. Cutler said that as a part of this sign plan, plastic box signs will not be allowed. Commissioner SIMBAI asked how long it will take to install the PSI sign, which is the largest sign due to traffic concerns. Ms. Mikulak said the applicant can answer that question, but usually the signs of this size are pre -fabricated and can be lifted into place by a large crane which will cut down on the time to install the sign. Commissioner LARSON asked if the Mattress Firm building is included in this sign project. Mr. Cutler explained that that building is under separate ownership and is not a part of this master sign plan and would have to follow the standard City Sign Code for their signs. Commissioner LARSON asked for clarification on what a wayfinding sign is. Mr. Cutler said wayfinding signs are directional signs to let patrons know where the tenants of the shopping center are located and are all interior signs. Commissioner VOS asked if the applicant is required to do the Master Sign Plan. Mr. Cutler explained that the PCD does not call for the sign plan but due to the size and location of the signs, the City could not permit them under the standard sign code. Ms. Mikulak added the City's sign code works well for a single business with a single sign, but not for a property this large and it needs its own unique set of rules. Commissioner VOS asked about the materials that will be used for these signs and if this hearing will approve or deny the variances in height and size and adding interior signage. Planning Commission Minutes - April 4, 2019 Mr. Cutler said the materials are listed on page 4 of the sign plan and once the applicant applies for a building permit the permits are public record. He mentioned the applicant has proposed the backing material of all the signs will be the same. Ms. Mikulak added this is typical detail shown in the plan and there are no code requirements for materials. The only code requirement is that the base of the sign be consistent with the building. She also said the applicant is allowed to have a 50 - foot sign on Youngfield because they are highway oriented. The square footage of the sign is larger than usual, but this is a package deal and it is all being approved or denied as a whole. Commissioner VOS also asked if the corner signs are attached to the buildings and if they stick out. Mr. Cutler explained that those signs will follow the City Code and are not a part of the master sign plan. Commissioner LEO asked what the height of the current sign is on Youngfield. Mr. Cutler said the current sign is not 50 feet, but the Chili's and Applejack Liquor signs are 50 feet in height. Commissioner LEO also wondered if this plan is approved can the applicant add more freestanding signs at a later date. Mr. Cutler explained that if the applicant wants to add signs in the future they will have to come to the City with an amendment to the plan. Commissioner LEO inquired why the applicant is now requesting a Master Sign Plan. Mr. Cutler said the City has been pushing the Regency Centers to apply for a Master sign plan to allow for more cohesive signage on the site. Ms. Mikulak explained it is difficult for new business on the site to add a sign because the Development Plan does not allow for any more signs. Commissioner OHM said he has safety concerns for pedestrians if the 50 and 30 - foot signs are placed too close to the sidewalks if there is no sight triangles required due to signalized traffic lights being in place. Mr. Cutler explained that the applicant has proposed a 15 -foot setback for the 50 - foot sign and an 8 -foot sidewalk will be set behind a 6 -foot amenity zone. He added that the 1 -foot setback for the 30 -foot signs is a minimum and the final setback will be determined on how the parcel develops and if there is an unsafe sight distance condition then the setback will be increased. Planning Commission Minutes -12- April 12 - April 4, 2019 Commissioner OHM also wondered what the positioning of the signs on Youngfield is in relation to the overhead power lines. Ms. Mikulak said she believes the City is using part of the I% funds to place the power lines underground. Commissioner OHM asked if the Master Sign Plan incorporates the existing and proposed free standing signs for this project. Mr. Cutler explained the Master Sign Plan defines separately the two existing non- conforming, single -tenant, freestanding signs which are the Chili's and Applejack's signs. Commissioner PETERSON asked about the 1.5 to 1 ratio for wall signs and the scripts square footage. He also asked if there is maximum size for a wall sign. Ms. Mikulak responded that when a sign is not a box or cabinet sign, but is channel letters, the smallest polygon is used to figure the ratio and there is no maximum size for a wall sign. Commissioner SIMBAI wanted to know what the reasoning is of the one person who opposed the Master Sign Plan. Mr. Cutler explained she was not opposed to the sign plan per say, but to the construction, traffic, noise and redevelopment. He added she might have been opposed to the 50 -foot sign illuminating beyond the borders. Commissioner LARSON is concerned about the 50 -foot sign being placed on the island and then possibly moved if the island is changed. Mr. Cutler agreed and said the reconstruction of the island and the sign placement would happen in tandem. Ms. Mikulak added that the purpose of the Master Sign Plan is to provide a future vision but it doesn't specify a time period for building the signs. It shows generally where the signs will be located. Tom Metzger, Applicant 8480 E. Orchard Rd, Ste. 6900, Greenwood Village Mr. Metzger showed a few images of the signs and what they will look like. Commissioner Simbai asked how long it will take to install a sign. Planning Commission Minutes -13 - April 4, 2019 Mr. Metzger explained the signs are pre -fabricated and can be installed in a one - day period. He added the 50 -foot sign might be moved to the south a little and out of the island. Commissioner VOS asked if the RTD facility is moving, or not. Mr. Metzger confirmed the facility will be moving May 18 to Ward Road with continuing service down Youngfield Street. Commissioner LARSON asked if the sign on 38th Ave. will be oriented to east and west bound traffic Mr. Metzger agreed. He also explained some of the agreement between Regency Centers and the two businesses and their non -conforming signs. Commissioner LARSON asked if approved when the effective date will be. Mr. Cutler said effective date will be when the Master Sign Plan is recorded at the County. Commissioner OHM said if approved he hopes staff will keep in mind to have an open sight triangle with regards to sign placement for safety reasons. Ms. Mikulak said it is a provision in Chapter 26-707 of the Municipal Code. Commissioner PETERSON asked if the new sign code applies to lighting of signs. Ms. Mikulak replied that it applies to new signs, but not existing. Mr. Cutler said the dimmers will also be installed on these new signs. It was moved by Commissioner LARSON and seconded by Commissioner PETERSON to APPROVE Case No. WZ-18-23, a request for approval of a master sign plan for a planned commercial development (PCD) located on the east side of Youngfield Street between W. 32nd Avenue and W. 38' Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The site is eligible for a master sign plan. 2. The master sign plan promotes well-planned and well-designed signage. 3. The master sign plan is consistent with the intent of the sign code and is appropriate for the context of the development. With the following conditions: 1. An edit be made to item C on page 2 regarding non -conforming signs to clarify damage for wall signs. Planning Commission Minutes -14- April 14 - April 4, 2019 2. The applicant will work with staff to create a maximum size allowance for wall signs for a tenant over a certain square footage. Motion passed 7-0. 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Planning Commission Dinner Training April 18, 2019 Ms. Mikulak reminded the commission that dinner will be at 6:00 p.m. in one of the Conference Rooms and the training will start at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. B. Commissioner VOS handed out information regarding a Golden Planning Commission meeting. She also said she was finally receiving the Planning publication for APA again, after a year of not receiving it. Ms. Mikulak explained there were some membership issues and it is good to know things have been corrected. C. Commissioner LARSON let the Commission know he attended a seminar held by the American Institute of Certified Planners discussing short term rentals and how Denver has approached the issue; it was very informative. 10. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner LEO and seconded by Commissioner VOS to adjourn the meeting at 9:52 p.m. Motion carried 7-0. 17 S t Ohm, Chair Planning Commission Minutes April 4, 2019 Tammy Odean-Wcording Secretary -15-