HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-24-2025 - City Council Meeting AgendaAGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
Monday, February 24, 2025,
6:30 p.m.
This meeting will be conducted as a virtual meeting, and in person, at: 7500 West 29th
Avenue, Municipal Building, Council Chambers.
City Council members and City staff members will be physically present at the
Municipal building for this meeting. The public may participate in these ways:
2. Attend the meeting in person at City Hall. Use the appropriate roster to sign up to
speak upon arrival.
3. Provide comment in advance at www.wheatridgespeaks.org (comment by noon
on February 24, 2025)
4. Virtually attend and participate in the meeting through a device or phone:
Click here to pre-register and provide public comment by Zoom (You must
preregister before 6:00 p.m. on February 24, 2025)
5. View the meeting live or later at www.wheatridgespeaks.org, Channel 8, or
YouTube Live at https://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/view
Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings
sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. The City will upon request, provide auxiliary
aids and services leading to effective communication for people with disabilities,
including qualified sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, documents
in Braille, and other ways of making communications accessible to people who have
speech, hearing, or vision impairments. To request auxiliary aid, service for effective
communication, or document in a different format, please use this form or contact
ADA Coordinator, (Kelly McLaughlin at ada@ci.wheatridge.co.us or 303-235-2885) as
soon as possible, preferably 7 days before the activity or event.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES
Proclamation – Women’s History Month and International Women’s Day
PUBLICS’ RIGHT TO SPEAK
a. Public may speak on any matter not on the agenda for a maximum of 3 minutes
under Publics’ Right to Speak. Please speak up to be heard when directed by
the mayor.
b. Members of the Public who wish to speak on a Public Hearing item or Decision,
Resolution, or Motion may speak when directed by the mayor at the conclusion
of the staff report for that specific agenda item.
c. Members of the Public may comment on any agenda item in writing by noon on
the day of the meeting at www.WheatRidgeSpeaks.org. Comments made on
Wheat Ridge Speaks are considered part of the public record.
1.CONSENT AGENDA
a. Resolution No. 12-2025 – a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget to
reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation for the re-
appropriation and re-encumbrance of 2024 Fiscal Year encumbered funds in the
amount of $5,164,449
b. Resolution No.13-2025 – a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2024 2J and 2E
Budgets in the amount of $5,012,967 and approving the transfer of funds from
the 2J Next Chapter Bond Fund to the 2E Investing 4 the Future Bond Fund to
complete the defeasance of the 2017 bonds.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING
2. Resolution No. 14-2025 a resolution approving a Service Plan and
Intergovernmental Agreement for the Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
3. Council Bill No. 05-2025 – an ordinance amending the Wheat Ridge Code of
Laws concerning disposition of lost, abandoned, and unclaimed property
ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING
None
DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND MOTIONS
4. Motion to approve appointments to Boards, Commissions, and Committees
5. Motion approving a contract with Charles Abbott Associates, Inc., for building
division services and authorizing subsequent payments
CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS
CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS
ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
STUDY SESSION NOTES
Hybrid - Virtual Meeting
February 3, 2025
1. Call to Order
Mayor Starker called the Study Session to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. Attendance
Council Members present: Jenny Snell, Rachel Hultin, Amanda Weaver (via Zoom), Korey
Stites, Dan Larson, Leah Dozeman, and Scott Ohm.
Absent: Janeece Hoppe
Also present: City Manager Patrick Goff, Assistant City Manager Marianne Schilling,
Management Analyst Cole Haeslip, Director Community Development Lauren Mikulak,
Senior Deputy City Clerk Margy Greer, and other staff and interested residents.
3. Public Comment
Via Zoom
Steve Shinn – Out Front Media representative – operate seven of the 15 billboards along
the I-70 Corridor. Shinn stated that if Council moves forward with allowing digital messaging
on public property, Out Front Media would like to be at the table to discuss a private/public
partnership.
4. Digital Billboards and Signs
Issue
City Manager Patrick Goff stated that City Council and staff have been approached by
advertising companies requesting code amendments that would allow digital signs in two
specific contexts. First, they are requesting the city to consider expanding allowances for
digital signs on city-owned property, including right-of-way and to allow for a public-private
partnerships related to digital ad signs.
Community Development Director Lauren Mikulak stated that the staff was not making a
recommendation regarding amending the code but provided information to Council to help
them in making a decision moving forward Mikulak presented information regarding CDOT’s
regulations, asked Council to review the distance requirements, the number of signs, and
other potential regulations. She posed the question regarding digital signs on city-owned
property, whether Council wished to establish a new sign category that would allow such
signs and provide consistent standards across all city-owned properties. She also asked
Council to discuss changing the code to allow off-premises signs and the potential for ad
sales and revenue-sharing public-private partnership arrangements for city-owned property.
Mikulak also spoke to whether permissions would be granted on a first-come first-served
basis or a lottery.
Todd Messenger, representative of Lamar Advertising, spoke in favor of first-come first-
served regarding spacing requirements. He spoke to the possibility for public messaging
such as Amber Alerts as well as other public service announcements.
Council Comments
Council Member Hultin spoke in opposition of digital advertising, finding it distracting and
dangerous while driving. She stated that Council has spoken in the past about making the
Wheat Ridge corridors attractive and inviting places and she does not believe the digital
billboards are either. She stated that if local businesses were wanting it, she would be glad
to sit down and visit the issue again, but the businesses wanting the larger signage are
coming from outside Wheat Ridge.
City Attorney Gerald Dahl stated that the City can be very stringent about the limitations of
content they can put on the signage on public property. He stated that the categories would
be similar to what is allowed by RTD on their buses.
Mayor Pro Tem Stites stated he was in favor of moving forward with having another avenue
to push out messages to the public, particularly in the case of emergencies, in real time.
He stated that the billboards on the highway look old and tired, and the digital ones are
more modern, and the lighting concerns have been addressed by the providers.
Council Member Dozeman asked about the materials that the advertising is made. A
representative from Lamar stated that they are made of vinyl and are recyclable. Answering
another question, the representative stated that the cost difference between static and
digital is nearly the same; however, the savings is in the cost of not having to print the
materials. The advantage is having instantly changeable signs. The same advertisement or
announcement can be placed on several digital signs in different cities. She spoke in favor
of moving forward with the code amendment. She spoke in favor of the public-private
partnership.
Council Member Weaver spoke in favor of moving forward with the possibility of allowing
digital signs and public-private partnerships. She stated there is a larger conversation on
signage which needs to take place with City Council.
Council Member Larson stated that billboards are closely monitored and restricted and are
along I-70. Signs are regulated differently. He explained that the City does get sales tax
from the use of billboards. He stated his support of digital billboard signs along I-70.
Council Member Hultin stated that looking at the sign code more holistically is important.
She stated she does not like digital signs, especially while driving at night. There is industry
representative in the room, but changing our regulatory environment there are other people
with vested interests that Council needs to hear from.
Council Member Ohm stated that billboards stated that he would not be in favor of all the
billboards becoming digital, perhaps 1-2 per district. He stated he would be in favor of
public service announcements and partnerships for same. He stated he advocates for
better communication with residents and businesses. He stated he wants to have additional
conversation regarding digital signage.
Mayor Starker asked Lamar about the public-private partnership and locations in which they
were interested. Lamar representative stated that wherever the City wants the message is
the place they want to put it. Lamar answered the Mayor’s questions regarding size of
billboards and the speed of travel resulting in readability of the advertisement.
Mikulak and Dahl spoke to the issues with the lottery system and the first-come first-served
system.
Mikulak stated that an overhaul of the entire sign code in the short term.
Council reached consensus on moving forward with the pursuing 1) digital billboards, 2)
amending the code to create signs on city-owned property; and 3) public-private
partnerships.
5. 2025 Legislative Agenda
Issue
Management Analyst Cole Haselip gave a brief overview of the Legislative Advocacy
program consisting of a Legislative Agenda, the Legislative Committee, and potential
lobbying on legislation. He presented the Legislative Agenda stating there are ten focus
areas in the Agenda including Home Rule, Economic Development, Community
Development, Affordable Housing, Homelessness, Public Safety, Infrastructure &
Transportation, Sustainability, Parks & Rec, and Administrative Services. Haselip stated
that the Legislative Agenda included are five key themes: Community-centered solution,
Equity and Accessibility, Statewide Collaboration, Local Control, and Opposing
Unfunded Mandates.
Haselip asked Council for comments regarding the proposed Legislative Agenda, including
anything that they may want added, removed, or amended. He asked for consensus to
move the Legislative Agenda forward for adoption at the February 10, 2025, Regular
City Council Meeting.
Council Member Hultin thanked Cole Haselip for his work on the Legislative Agenda.
Council Members thanked the Legislative Committee which consists of Mayor Starker and
Council Members Larson and Hultin and there was consensus to move forward toward
adoption of the Agenda.
6. Staff Reports
City Manager Patrick Goff stated there was a Service Plan presented to the City regarding
the creation of Metropolitan Districts for services on the Lutheran Legacy Campus. Legal
requirements including notices being sent to the adjacent neighborhoods. Approximately 80
notices were sent which caused some confusion. He stated that the creation of a
metropolitan district will only affect the properties within the boundaries of the Lutheran
Campus, but adjacent neighbors had to be noticed according to state law. A follow up letter
will be sent for further explanation by Intermountain Health and Mikulak’s staff has put
clarifying information on the city’s website as well.
7. Elected Officials Reports
Mayor and Council Members reported on recent meetings and events they attended and
upcoming activities in the community.
8. Adjournment
With no further business to come before Council, Mayor Starker adjourned the meeting
at 7:38 p.m.
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
Korey Stites, Mayor Pro Tem
PROCLAMATION
WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH AND INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY
MARCH 2025 AND MARCH 8, 2025
WHEREAS, Women's History Month is declared annually as the month that highlights the
contributions of women throughout history and in contemporary society and March 8th has been
recognized across the world as International Women’s Day since 1911; and
WHEREAS, in March 1980, President Jimmy Carter issued the first Presidential Proclamation
declaring Women’s History Week to align with International Women’s Day to commemorate the
accomplishments, perspectives, and experiences of women in the United States; and
WHEREAS, in November 1893, a Colorado referendum passed women’s suffrage into law,
making it the first state in the country to give women the right to vote; and
WHEREAS, while the right to vote is a common topic of study when examining women's
history, there are many more issues, perspectives, and accomplishments that require investigation
across history, literature, science, politics, and the arts to appreciate and understand the significant
contributions of women throughout history; and
WHEREAS, the 2025 Women’s History Month theme established by The National Women’s
History Alliance is titled “Moving Forward Together! Women Educating & Inspiring Generations,”
focuses on woman in both the past and present who have influenced and inspired others by
dedicating their lives to education, mentorship and leadership; and
WHEREAS, women are residents, business owners, employees, elected officials, volunteers,
caregivers and members of city staff, and make a difference every day in the City of Wheat Ridge and
are to be celebrated for their contributions.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that I, Mayor Bud Starker and the Wheat Ridge City
Council, formally celebrate the month of March 2025, as Women’s History Month and March 8, 2025,
as International Women’s Day in Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, on this 24th day of February 2025.
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk Bud Starker, Mayor
ITEM NUMBER: 1a
DATE: February 24, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
RESOLUTION 12-2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 BUDGET
TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
APPROPRIATION FOR THE RE-APPROPRIATION AND RE-
ENCUMBRANCE OF 2024 FISCAL YEAR ENCUMBERED
FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,164,449
☐PUBLIC HEARING
☐BIDS/MOTIONS
☒RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
There are 67 open purchase orders from the 2024 budget that will be carried over to the
2025 budget. Each purchase order is associated with a specific project that was not fully
completed in the 2024 fiscal year. The funds which were encumbered for these purchase orders were transferred to the unreserved fund balance of the relevant fund when the
purchase orders were closed. To continue or close out these projects in 2025, a
supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $5,164,449 is necessary to allow
transfer of these funds into specific budget line items in the 2025 Budget.
PRIOR ACTION:
Council approves the re-encumbrance of active purchase orders on an annual basis.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
A supplemental budget appropriation is requested in the amount of $5,164,449. When the
purchase orders were closed on December 31, 2024, the funds encumbered for those
purchase orders are transferred to the unreserved fund balance in each of the funds listed
below. Therefore, there are adequate funds in the various unreserved fund balances to meet this request and there will not be a net negative effect to the unreserved fund
balances. A detailed list of open purchase orders for 2024 is attached. The funds will be
distributed as follows:
Council Action Form – Purchase Order Carryovers
February 24, 2025
Page 2
General Fund $ 920,521
Public Art Fund $ 215,250 Capital Project Fund $ 1,151,795
Open Space Fund $ 1,893,402
Municipal Court Fund $ 8,066
Renewal Wheat Ridge Bond Projects $ 593,249
Wheat Ridge Housing Fund $ 6,180 Conservation Trust Fund $ 358,686
Equipment Replacement Fund $ 17,300
Total: $ 5,164,449
BACKGROUND:
Per the direction of City Council in 2005, the City utilizes generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) which requires all encumbrances expire at year-end.
The Open PO Report (attachment 2) provides the reason for the purchase order to be
carried over into 2025. The City experienced two challenges in 2024 that are worth noting
here:
1. The City experienced delays in receiving vehicles and equipment due to global
supply chain issues 2. Staff turnover and vacancies delayed some projects
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the supplemental budget appropriation. RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve Resolution No. 12-2025, a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation for the re-
appropriation and re-encumbrance of 2024 Fiscal Year encumbered funds in the amount
of $5,164,449.”
Or,
“I move to postpone indefinitely Resolution No. 12-2025, a resolution amending the Fiscal
Year 2025 Budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation for the
re-appropriation and re-encumbrance of 2024 Fiscal Year encumbered funds in the
amount of $5,164,449 for the following reason(s) _______________________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Whitney Mugford-Smith, Procurement Manager Mark Colvin, Finance Manager
Council Action Form – Purchase Order Carryovers
February 24, 2025
Page 3
Allison Scheck, Deputy City Manager
Patrick Goff, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 12-2025
2. Open Purchase Order Report for 2024
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 12
SERIES OF 2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 BUDGET TO
REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
APPROPRIATION FOR THE RE-APPROPRIATION AND RE-ENCUMBRANCE
OF 2024 FISCAL YEAR ENCUMBERED FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF
$5,164,449
WHEREAS, the City’s independent auditor has recommended that the City utilize
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for its budgeting basis which requires
all encumbrances to expire at year end; and
WHEREAS, 67 purchase orders remained open on December 31, 2024; and
WHEREAS, to continue these projects in 2025, a supplemental budget
appropriation is necessary to transfer funds from unreserved fund balances to specific
2025 budget line items.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT:
Section 1. The City of Wheat Ridge Fiscal Year 2025 Budget be amended
accordingly, specifically transferring a total of $5,164,449 from the following unreserved
fund balances to specific 2025 Budget line items as detailed in the open PO report:
General Fund $920,521
Public Art Fund $215,250
Capital Project Fund $1,151,795
Open Space Fund $1,893,402
Municipal Court Fund $8,066
Renewal Wheat Ridge Bond Projects $593,249
Wheat Ridge Housing Fund $6,180
Conservation Trust Fund $358,686
Equipment Replacement Fund $17,300
TOTAL $5,164,449
ATTACHMENT 1
DONE AND RESOLVED this 24th day of February 2025
[SEAL]
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
Bud Starker, Mayor
Fund / Vendor Description Original $Open Amount Reason for Carryover
01 - General Fund
Anderson Hallas Architecture Municipal Feasibility Study 220,000.00$ 213,686.35$ Work is currently in progress
Internal Fund Distribution Emergency Solutions Grant 75,000.00$ 45,000.00$ Grant to pay for services and supplies to assist members
of the unhoused community
GovOS Inc.Short-term Rental Platform 10,500.00$ 4,374.93$ Currently on monthly billing, moving to annual for future
cycles
Tyler Technologies Brazos e-Citation 139,570.00$ 8,379.00$ Implementation of the solution is not yet complete
Radio Enhancement Systems Design and Installation of Public
Radio Amplifier 14,200.00$ 14,200.00$ Work is currently in progress
The Ballard Group Boiler Circulating Pump Design 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ Work is currently in progress
Slate / Officescapes Office Furniture Restack PW 13,565.79$ 13,565.79$ Furniture ordered in 2024, due to arrive March 2025
Arc Document Solutions Digitization of Paper Documents 11,000.00$ 5,261.14$ Work is in progress and will wrap in Q1 2025
czb City Plan update 400,000.00$ 80,225.00$ Work is currently in progress expected to wrap in 2025
Paladin Technologies PW NEDAP Installation 10,893.81$ 10,893.81$ Materials ordered in 2024, installation in 2025
Mountaintop Mechanical Electrical Wiring for Mag Tan 6,275.00$ 6,275.00$ Materials ordered in 2024, installation in 2025
Lighthouse Transportation 38th Ave. Retiming Project 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ Work is currently in progress
Econolite Control Products Centracs Mobility System 48,530.00$ 48,530.00$ Work is currently in progress
Streetscan USA Inc.StreetScan Pavement
Management 58,116.00$ 34,314.00$ Work is currently in progress
Auto Truck Group LLC Snow and Ice Uplift 175,514.00$ 175,514.00$ Delayed due to supply chain disruption. Delivery due in 2025
McCandless International 2024 6x2 International Tandem 159,617.00$ 159,617.00$ Delayed due to supply chain disruption. Delivery due in
2025
Daniels Long Automotive 2025 Chevrolet Silverado 4WD 79,030.00$ 79,030.00$ Delayed due to supply chain disruption. Delivery due in
2025
Theresquared LLC Public Art Consulting Fees 20,749.98$ 541.63$ Agreement amended due to CDOT requested changes to
final location
HDR Engineering, Inc.4105 Kipling Appraisal &
Acquisition 10,613.16$ 10,113.16$ Work is currently in progress
Contingency Fund 4105 Kipling Appraisal &
Acquisition 500.00$ 500.00$ Holding until needed
01 - General Fund Total 920,520.81$
12 - Public Art Fund
Cor4 Studios / Shachtman Studios Wadsworth Public Art 475,000.00$ 71,250.00$ Agreement amended due to CDOT requested changes to
final location
Tyler Fuqua Creations Public Art for Ward TOD 160,000.00$ 144,000.00$ Work is currently in progress
215,250.00$ 12 - Public Art Fund Total
ATTACHMENT 2
30 - Capital Project Fund
RESPEC Company LLC Stormwater Master Plan 200,000.00$ 13,067.31$ Phase I complete, beginning Phase II
Olsson Associates Wadsworth Path Project 1,047,868.31$ 774,732.30$ Work is currently in progress
Contingency Fund Wadsworth Path Project 31,206.69$ 31,206.69$ Work is currently in progress
Colorado Barricade Co.2024 Striping and Pavement
Marking 238,100.00$ 238,100.00$ Work is currently in progress
Contingency Fund 2024 Striping and Pavement Marking 11,900.00$ 11,900.00$ Holding until needed
Lakeside Autowash Public Improvement
Reimbursement 4,941.25$ 4,941.25$ Work is currently in progress
Contingency Fund Contingency for Concrete Repair 55,650.46$ 38,985.46$ Holding until needed
Ayres Associates 38th West Study 615,210.00$ 14,461.89$ Work is ongoing
Radio Enhancement System Design and Installation of Public
Radio Amplifier 24,400.00$ 24,400.00$ Work is currently in progress
1,151,794.90$
32 - Open Space Fund
Environmental Landworks Happiness Gardens Irrigation 12,525.00$ 12,525.00$ Work is currently in progress
Metro Fence Company Happiness Gardens Fence Upgrade 10,364.00$ 10,364.00$ Work is currently in progress
Internal Fund Distribution Happiness Gardens Wash Station 40,821.17$ 7,252.17$ Work is currently in progress
PlanIt Geo Inc.TreePlotter Software 46,750.00$ 28,000.00$ 3-year software plan, implemented, grant funded
The Architerra Group Panorama Tennis Courts Design 112,050.00$ 42,760.00$ Work is currently in progress
Design Concepts Inc.Tabor Lake Trail Improvements
Design 207,018.00$ 28,771.93$ Work is currently in progress
Internal Fund Distribution Panorama & Stites Dugout 300,000.00$ 210,010.00$ Design work in progress, Construction pending
Contractor selection
The Architerra Group Dugout Backstop Design for Panorama and Stites 89,990.00$ 44,012.25$ Work is currently in progress
Sunland Asphalt & Construction Hayward Park Walking Trail 238,258.77$ 238,258.77$ Work will begin when weather allows
Internal Fund Distribution Wayfinding Signage for Greenbelt 116,324.00$ 116,324.00$ Project on hold pending JeffCo decisions
Berry Dunn McNeil Parker Parks & Rec Master Plan 249,999.00$ 68,436.00$ Work is currently in progress
The Architerra Group The Green at 38th Final Design 582,209.00$ 57,889.29$ Work is currently in progress
ECI Site Construction Management The Green at 38th Construction 4,086,590.00$ 1,017,548.94$ Work is currently in progress
Feasibility Study for Trails City and County of Denver 50,000.00$ 11,250.00$ Work is ongoing
1,893,402.35$
33 - Municipal Court Fund
CEIA-USA Replacement Metal Detector 8,066.07$ 8,066.07$ New unit ordered in 2024; awaiting delivery
33 - Municipal Court Fund Total 8,066.07$
30 - Capital Project Fund Total
32 - Open Space Fund Total
40 - Renewal Wheat Ridge Bond
David Evans and Associates Youngfield Aesthetics / Bike Lanes 1,155,932.00$ 37,455.99$ Work is currently in progress
EV Studio LLC Clear Creek Crossing Bus
Terminal Design 81,800.00$ 60,250.00$ Work is currently in progress
Contingency Fund Clear Creek Crossing Bus
Terminal Design Contingency 8,180.00$ 8,180.00$ Holding until needed
WSB LLC Youngfield Bridge Scour 25,950.00$ 9,761.66$ Work is currently in progress
West Fork Construction Scour Repair for Youngfield Bridge 149,725.00$ 149,725.00$ Work is scheduled for 2025, weather dependent
Contingency Fund Scour Repair for Youngfield Bridge Copntingency 14,975.00$ 14,975.00$ Holding until needed
Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 38th & Kipling Intersection
Improvements 45,437.00$ 23,167.00$ Work is currently in progress
Reliant Mechanical Heat Recovery Unit Replacement 1,562,500.00$ 31,550.00$ Work is currently in progress
Canyon Engineering Group LLC Rec Center Bridge Repair Engineering Support 38,324.40$ 1,056.65$ Work is currently in progress
Schlosser Signs Inc.Rec Center Sign Update 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$ Work is currently in progress
Commercial Electronic Systems Rec Center Fire Alarm Upgrades 74,292.08$ 45,270.45$ Work is currently in progress
Independent Roofing Specialists Rec Center Skylight Replacement 14,034.75$ 14,034.75$ Work will begin in 2025 dependent on weather
Schlosser Signs Inc.Repurpose the Grambel Piece for
Rec Center Sign 19,818.50$ 19,818.50$ Work is currently in progress
Plumbing Samurai Inc Install Pump at Rec Center 7,155.00$ 7,155.00$ Design in progress currently, install will occur in 2025
HDR Engineering, Inc ROW Acquisition Services for
Ward TOD 251,496.27$ 27,019.58$ Work is ongoing
AECOM Technical Services Ward TOD Construction Management 153,232.43$ 43,829.14$ Work is ongoing
593,248.72$
Ricker Cunningham LLC WR Inclusionary Zoning
Analysis 30,000.00$ 6,180.00$ Work is currently in progress
45 - Housing Fund Total 6,180.00$
Internal Fund Distribution Phase II Prospect Park Water
Pump 30,235.57$ 29,685.57$ Work will complete in 2025, weather dependent
ECI Site Construction Green at 38th Phase II
Construction 300,000.00$ 300,000.00$ Work will complete in 2025, weather dependent
40 - Renewal Wheat Ridge Bond Total
45 - Housing Fund
54 - Conservation Trust Fund
Altitude Athletic Surfeaces Tennis / Basketball Court
Resurface at Panorama & Stites 31,800.00$ 29,000.00$ Work will complete in 2025, weather dependent
358,685.57$
Stratalysts LLC ERP Consulting 48,000.00$ 17,300.00$ Work is ongoing
17,300.00$
5,164,448.42$
54 - Conservation Trust Fund Total
57 - Equipment Replacement Fund
57 - Equipment Replacement Fund Total
2024 Open Purchase Orders Total
ITEM NUMBER: 1b
DATE: February 24, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
RESOLUTION 13-2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024 2J and 2E
BUDGETS IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,012,967 AND APPROVING
THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE 2J NEXT CHAPTER BOND
FUND TO THE 2E INVESTING 4 THE FUTURE BOND FUND TO
COMPLETE THE DEFEASANCE OF THE 2017 BONDS
☐PUBLIC HEARING ☐BIDS/MOTIONS ☒RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING ☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
In discussions with Council prior to the 2J bond issuance, it was agreed that $7.4
million of the $12.6 million 2E Fund balance would be used to pay down the 2017
bonds. At that time, the remaining debit service on the 2017 bonds was approximately $12.4 million. The additional $5.0 million needed to completely pay off the 2017 bonds
was included in the $38.7 million 2J bond issuance proceeds. City Staff believed the
$5.0 million payoff would be made through escrow, rather than an expense to the City.
Rather, the $5.0 million was included in the total amount of 2J bond issuance proceeds
that the City received and the payoff is considered a 2E expense. Therefore, in order to be fully transparent with the community and to comply with the City’s budgetary
procedures, a supplemental appropriation and transfer of funds is necessary.
PRIOR ACTION:
Council approved Resolution 51-2024 on December 9, 2024. Resolution 51-2024 provided for the amendment of the fiscal year 2024 2E budget to reflect the defeasance
of the remaining debt service on the 2017 bonds, among several provisions. The
approximate amounts of the debt service payoff were also discussed with Council on
September 9, 2024.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no financial impact to the City. The bond revenue associated with the $5 million
payoff was deposited with the City in escrow to then be used to pay off the remaining debt.
Council Action Form – 2J Bond Fund Amendments February 24, 2025
Page 2
Therefore, the bond revenue received in the new 2J Next Chapter Bond Fund is
approximately $5 million higher than anticipated.
BACKGROUND:
When the 2017 sales tax bonds were sold, the City created a new fund, the 2E Fund, to
track revenues pledged to bond debt service and expenditures related to four 2E
projects: Wadsworth Boulevard, Clear Creek Crossing, Anderson Park and Ward Station.
As the 2E revenue collection was nearing its $38.5 million cap, Council placed a question on the 2023 ballot, Initiative 2J, asking Wheat Ridge voters to extend the half
cent sales tax approved by the voters in 2016 and increase debt up to $75 million.
Initiative 2J passed, and on September 9, 2024, Council approved the bond ordinance to
issue bonds. The first tranche of bonds closed in October 2024 yielding $33.3 million in
project funds.
At the time of the October 2024 bond issuance, the 2E fund had a remaining fund
balance of approximately $12.6 million. Also, there was $12.4 million of total debt
service owed on the 2017 bonds. In the course of the work to issue the new 2J revenue
bonds, it became clear it was financially prudent for the City to use approximately $7.4 million of the 2E balance to defease (pay off) a portion of the outstanding 2017 bond
indebtedness and transfer approximately $5.2 million to the CIP Fund to help defray
remaining costs of the Improve Wadsworth project. The remaining $5.0 million of 2017
debt service was refunded (included) in the 2024 bond issuance.
City Staff believed the $5 million in refunded proceeds would be a pass-through and the
$5.0 million would be transferred into escrow along with the City’s $7.4 million
contribution toward the 2017 bond defeasance. In reality, as City Staff learned later, the
$5.0 million refunded proceeds were included in the total $38.7 million bond issuance
proceeds received by the City in the new “Next Chapter 2J Fund”. Internally, the $5.0 million in refunded proceeds should have been passed from the Next Chapter 2J Fund
to the 2E Fund where it would have been an additional funding source for the final 2017
bond principal payment of $9,120,000 dated January 21, 2025. Section 1 of Resolution
51-2024 incorrectly requested a supplemental budget appropriation of $4,107,033 for
the final 2017 bond principal payment. In reality, Section 1 of Resolution 51-2024 should have requested a supplemental budget appropriation of $9,120,000. The $5.0
million in refunded proceeds from the 2J bond issuance is the funding source of the
budget supplemental appropriation gap.
The Next Chapter 2J Fund was established on November 25, 2024. This fund tracks all pledged revenues (the extended half cent sales and use tax), bond proceeds and
investment earnings, etc. and expenditures (project spending, administrative costs, debt
service, etc.) associated with the new revenue bonds.
Should Council approve this resolution, a transfer of $5,012,967 will be made from the
Council Action Form – 2J Bond Fund Amendments February 24, 2025
Page 3
Next Chapter 2J Fund, as directed, into the 2E Fund.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve Resolution No 13-2025, a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2024 2J and 2E budgets in the amount of $5,012,967 and approving the transfer of funds from the 2J Next Chapter Bond Fund to the 2E Investing 4 the Future Bond Fund to complete the defeasance of the 2017 bonds.”
Or,
“I move to deny Resolution No 13-2025, a resolution amending the Fiscal Year
2024 2J and 2E budgets in the amount of $5,012,967 and approving the transfer of funds for the following reason(s) _______________________________.”
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Mark Colvin, Finance Manager Allison Scheck, Deputy City Manager
Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 13-2025
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 13
SERIES OF 2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024 2J AND
2E BUDGETS IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,012,967 AND APPROVING THE
TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE 2J NEXT CHAPTER BOND FUND
TO THE 2E INVESTING 4 THE FUTURE BOND FUND TO COMPLETE
THE DEFEASANCE OF THE 2017 BONDS
WHEREAS, in 2023, Wheat Ridge voters continued the half cent sales tax originally
authorized in 2016 to provide for transformative investments in infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, City Council established a new fund, the 2J Next Chapter Bond Fund,
to separate the revenues and expenditures associated with the extended half cent sales
tax; and
WHEREAS, the City received a bond refund of $5,012,967 in the 2024 Revenue
Bond Issuance proceeds that was intended to supplement the total amount needed to
defease the remainder of the 2017 Series A Revenue Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the City previously believed the bond refund of $5,012,967 was a pass-
through when in reality it was deposited into a City escrow account.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, as follows:
Section 1. A supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $5,012,967 is hereby approved from the 2J Next Chapter Budget (Fund 66) undesignated reserves to
account number 66-610-890-892.
Section 2. A transfer from the 2J Next Chapter Budget (Fund 66) account number 66-610-890-892 to the 2E Budget (Fund 31) account number 31-590-00-592 in the amount of $5,012,967 is hereby approved.
Section 3. A supplemental appropriation in the amount of $5,012,967 is hereby
approved from the 2E Budget (Fund 31) undesignated reserves to account 31-610-900-901.
DONE AND RESOLVED this 24th day of February 2025
ATTACHMENT 1
Bud Starker, Mayor
[SEAL]
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
ITEM NUMBER: 2
DATE: February 24, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
RESOLUTION 14-2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SERVICE PLAN AND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE LEGACY
METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
☒PUBLIC HEARING
☐BIDS/MOTIONS
☒RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
City Council is asked to approve the Service Plan and Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)
for the Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12, a taxing district to be used to finance
certain improvements for the Lutheran Legacy Campus redevelopment. Service Plan approval is the means by which the City oversees the creation of such districts, which are
ultimately approved for formation by the district court.
PRIOR ACTION:
Consensus was reached by City Council at the February 10, 2025, study session to bring
this item forward for consideration at a public hearing.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no direct financial impact to the City if this Service Plan is approved. If approved,
future property owners within the boundaries of the Legacy Metropolitan District would
pay an additional 67 mills in property tax which equates to approximately $2,500 annually
for a residential property valued at $600,000.
BACKGROUND:
The City received a draft Service Plan for the Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12 (collectively, the “Districts”) on January 27, 2025, for approximately 100 acres of property comprised of the former Lutheran Medical Center campus (the “Property”). Metropolitan districts in Colorado are a common tool for financing the public infrastructure portion of development projects. All special districts in Colorado
organized under Title 32 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) are required to file a
Council Action Form – Legacy Metropolitan District
February 24, 2025
Page 2
service plan with the city council of the municipality in which the district is proposed.
The purpose of the Districts will be to provide all or a portion of public improvements for the benefit of the residents and taxpayers located within the boundaries of the Districts.
Cost of public improvements is estimated at $99 million. The Service Plan would allow
for a maximum debt of $110 million and a maximum debt mill levy of 67 mills for up to
40 years.
The proposed Service Plan describes and sets forth those powers and authorities the
Districts shall have as allowed by Colorado law. The exercise of such powers, however,
will at all times be governed by and subject to the terms of an IGA between the City and
the Districts. State law allows local governments to exert significant control over the organization and operation of special districts. The service plan approval process is the
key to exercising that control.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the Service Plan and Intergovernmental Agreement.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve Resolution No. 14-2025, a resolution approving a Service Plan and
Intergovernmental Agreement for the Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12.”
Or,
“I move to postpone indefinitely Resolution No. 14-2025, a resolution approving a Service
Plan and Intergovernmental Agreement for the Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12 for
the following reason(s) _______________________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Patrick Goff, City Manager
Jerry Dahl, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 14-2025
2. Service Plan for Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
a. Exhibit D – Intergovernmental Agreement
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 14
SERIES OF 2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SERVICE PLAN AND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE LEGACY METROPOLITAN
DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
WHEREAS, the Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12 (“District”) is being
organized pursuant to the Colorado Special District Act §§ 32-1-101, et seq., C.R.S.; and
WHEREAS, the District has submitted the District’s Service Plan for City Council
approval (the “Service Plan”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the Service Plan provides for the District’s provision and financing of public improvements and services for the development of a mixed-use project within the
City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO AS FOLLOWS:
1. The above and foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by reference and are adopted as findings and determinations of the City.
2. The City further finds and determines that all applicable requirements of §§ 32-
1-202(2), 32-1-203(2) and 32-1-204.5, C.R.S. relating to the submittal and requirements of the Service Plan and the consideration thereof by the City,
have been met.
3. Based upon the Service Plan, the City hereby determines as follows:
a. The Service Plan meets the requirements of § 32-1-202(2), C.R.S. regarding the contents thereof.
b. The Service Plan meets the requirements of § 32-1-203(2) as follows:
i. The Service Plan demonstrates a sufficient existing and projected
need for service in the area to be serviced by the District.
ii. Without the District, the existing service in the area is inadequate to serve the services proposed to be provided within the District’s boundaries.
iii. The District is capable of providing economical and sufficient service to the area within its proposed boundaries.
iv. The area included within the District’s boundaries and financing
mechanisms contemplated in the Service Plan have, or will have, the
financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a reasonable basis.
4. Pursuant to § 32-1-204.5(1), C.R.S., the City does hereby approve the Service
Plan as submitted to City Council on February 24, 2025.
5. A certified copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the Service Plan and filed in the records of the City, and the Petition for Organization of the District shall be required to comply with all other filings required by law.
6. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions hereof shall be and
the same are hereby repealed.
DONE AND RESOLVED this 24th day of February 2025
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
Bud Starker, Mayor
SERVICE PLAN FOR LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12 IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
Prepared By:
WHITE BEAR ANKELE TANAKA & WALDRON 2154 E. Commons Avenue, Suite 2000 Centennial, CO 80122
Approved February 24, 2025
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1
A. Purpose and Intent. ...................................................................................................1
B. Need for the Districts. ..............................................................................................1
C. Objective of the City Regarding Service Plan. ........................................................1
II. DEFINITIONS ...................................................................................................................2
III. BOUNDARIES PROPOSED LAND USE/POPULATION PROJECTIONS/ ASSESSED VALUATION ................................................................................................4
IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED POWERS, IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES 5
A. Powers of the Districts and Service Plan Amendment. ...........................................5
B. Preliminary Engineering Survey. .............................................................................7
C. Other Powers. ...........................................................................................................8
D. Facilities to be Constructed and/or Acquired. ..........................................................8
V. FINANCIAL PLAN ...........................................................................................................8
A. General. ....................................................................................................................8
B. Maximum Voted Interest Rate and Maximum Underwriting Discount. .................9
C. Maximum Debt Mill Levy. ......................................................................................9
D. Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term. ........................................................10
E. Debt Repayment Sources. ......................................................................................10
F. Security for Debt. ...................................................................................................10
G. TABOR Compliance. .............................................................................................11
H. Districts’ Operating Costs. .....................................................................................11
I. Special Improvement District. ...............................................................................11
VI. ANNUAL REPORT .........................................................................................................12
A. General ...................................................................................................................12
J. Reporting of Significant Events. ............................................................................12
ii
IX. DISSOLUTION ................................................................................................................13
X. DISCLOSURE TO PURCHASERS ...............................................................................13
XI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ................................................................14
XII. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................14
iii
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Districts
EXHIBIT B District Boundaries Map
EXHIBIT C City of Wheat Ridge Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT D Intergovernmental Agreement between the Districts and the City of Wheat Ridge
EXHIBIT E Capital Plan
EXHIBIT F Financial Plan
1
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose and Intent.
The purpose of the Districts will be to provide all or a portion of Public Improvements as
further defined and described in this Service Plan (within and without the Districts’ boundaries as will be determined by the Board to be in the best interest of the Districts and in accordance with the Service Plan), for the benefit of the residents and taxpayers located within the Project. The primary purpose of the Districts will be to finance the construction of these Public Improvements and have authorization as is necessary to own, operate and maintain Public Improvements not
otherwise transferred to another public entity. The Districts shall also be authorized, but not required, to provide covenant enforcement and design review services in accordance with the Special District Act. Upon completion to City standards, the Districts will convey to the City such Public Improvements as are constructed by the Districts in accordance with the Approved Development Plan. The Districts are independent units of local government, separate and distinct
from the City, and, except as may otherwise be provided for by State or local law or this Service Plan, their activities are subject to review by the City only insofar as they may deviate in a material matter from the requirements of the Service Plan.
B. Need for the Districts.
The Project is not presently served with the facilities and/or services proposed to be
provided by the Districts, nor does the City nor any other special district have any plans to provide such services within a reasonable time and on a comparable basis. There are currently no other governmental entities, including the City, located in the immediate vicinity of the Districts that consider it desirable, feasible or practical to undertake the planning, design, acquisition,
construction, installation, relocation, redevelopment and financing of the Public Improvements
needed for the Project. The Districts are therefore necessary in order for the Public Improvements required for the Project to be provided in the most economic manner possible. Approval of this Service Plan shall not indicate, implicitly or expressly, that any land use applications now on file with the City or any land use applications filed in the future will be approved by the City.
C. Objective of the City Regarding Service Plan.
The City’s objective in approving the Service Plan for the Districts is to authorize the Districts to provide for the planning, design, acquisition, demolition, construction, installation, relocation and redevelopment of the Public Improvements from the proceeds of Debt to be issued by the Districts and to further authorize the Districts to own, operate and maintain certain of the Public Improvements. All Debt is expected to be repaid by taxes imposed and collected for no
longer than the Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term and at a mill levy no higher than the Maximum Debt Mill Levy, and/or repaid by Fees as limited by Section IV.A.8. Debt which is issued within these parameters will insulate property owners from excessive tax and Fee burdens to support the servicing of the Debt and will result in a timely and reasonable discharge of the Debt. It is the intent of this Service Plan to assure to the extent possible that no property bear an
economic burden that is greater than that associated with the Maximum Debt Mill Levy in amount and that no property bear an economic burden for Debt that is greater than that associated with the Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term in duration even under bankruptcy or other unusual situations. Generally, the cost of Public Improvements that cannot be funded within these parameters are not costs to be paid by the Districts.
2
This Service Plan is intended to establish financial constraints and requirements associated with the Districts that are not to be violated under any circumstances. The primary purpose is to provide for the Public Improvements and services associated with the Project and regional needs.
II. DEFINITIONS
In this Service Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated below, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
Approved Development Plan: means a development plan, subdivision improvement plan, or other process established by the City (including but not limited to approval of a final plat, minor
development plat or site plan) for identifying, among other things, Public Improvements necessary for facilitating development for property within the Service Area, as approved by the City pursuant to the City Code, and as may be amended pursuant to the City Code from time to time.
Board: means the board of directors of one District or the boards of directors of all Districts,
in the aggregate, as the context may require.
Capital Plan: means the capital plan attached hereto as Exhibit E and referenced in Section IV.B which includes (i) a description of the type of capital facilities to be developed by the Districts; (ii) an estimate of the cost of the proposed facilities; and (iii) a capital expenditure plan correlating expenditures with development.
City: means the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
City Council: means the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
C.R.S.: means Colorado Revised Statutes.
Debt: means bonds, notes or other multiple fiscal year financial obligations for the payment of which the District has pledged to impose an ad valorem property tax mill levy. The definition
of Debt shall not include intergovernmental agreements between and among any of the Districts.
District: means any one of the Legacy Metropolitan District No. 1, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 2, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 3, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 4, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 5, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 6, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 7, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 8, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 9, Legacy Metropolitan
District No. 10, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 11, and Legacy Metropolitan District No. 12.
Districts: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 1, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 2, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 3, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 4, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 5, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 6, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 7, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 8, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 9, Legacy Metropolitan District No.
10, Legacy Metropolitan District No. 11, and Legacy Metropolitan District No. 12.
Districts Boundaries: means the legal boundaries of the Districts as described in Exhibit A attached hereto.
3
District Boundary Map: means the map attached hereto as Exhibit B, depicting the boundaries of the Districts.
District No. 1: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 1.
District No. 2: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 2.
District No. 3: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 3.
District No. 4: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 4.
District No. 5: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 5.
District No. 6: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 6.
District No. 7: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 7.
District No. 8: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 8.
District No. 9: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 9.
District No. 10: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 10.
District No. 11: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 11.
District No. 12: means Legacy Metropolitan District No. 12.
End User: means any owner, or tenant of any owner, of any platted Taxable Property within the District for which a certificate of occupancy has been issued. By way of illustration, a resident homeowner, renter, commercial property owner, or commercial tenant is an End User. The business entity that constructs homes or commercial structures is not an End User.
External Financial Advisor: means a consultant that: (i) advises Colorado governmental entities on matters relating to the issuance of securities by Colorado governmental entities, including matters such as the pricing, sales and marketing of such securities and the procuring of bond ratings, credit enhancement and insurance in respect of such securities; (ii) shall be an underwriter, investment banker, or individual listed as a public finance advisor in the Bond Buyer’s
Municipal Market Place; and (iii) is not an officer or employee of the Districts and has not been otherwise engaged to provide services in connection with the transaction related to the applicable Debt.
Fees: means any fee imposed by the District for services, programs or facilities provided
by the District, as described in Section IV.A.8 below.
Financial Plan: means the Financial Plan described in Section V which generally describes (i) how the Public Improvements are anticipated to be financed; (ii) how the Debt is expected to be incurred; and (iii) the estimated operating revenue derived from property taxes for the first budget year. Such Financial Plan may be adjusted by the Board in the future as is necessary to
accommodate phasing or other financial or development considerations so long as any such
4
adjustment does not exceed either the Maximum Debt Mill Levy or the Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term. The Financial Plan is based upon current estimates and will change based on actual development of the Project.
Maximum Debt Mill Levy: means the maximum mill levy the District is permitted to impose for payment of Debt as further set forth in Section V.C below, including adjustments to the Maximum Debt Mill Levy as are permitted under Section V.C.
Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term: means the maximum term for imposition of a debt service mill levy on a particular property as set forth in Section V.D below.
Project: means the development or property commonly referred to as Legacy Lutheran.
Public Improvements: means a part or all of the improvements authorized to be planned, designed, acquired, constructed, installed, relocated, redeveloped and financed as generally described in the Special District Act, except as specifically limited in Section IV below, to serve the future taxpayers and inhabitants of the Service Area as determined by the Board.
Service Area: means the property within the Districts Boundaries.
Service Plan: means this Service Plan for the Districts approved by City Council.
Service Plan Amendment: means an amendment to the Service Plan approved by City Council in accordance with the City Code and applicable state law.
Special District Act: means Section 32-1-101, et seq., C.R.S., as amended from time to
time.
State: means the State of Colorado.
TABOR: the Colorado Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights.
Taxable Property: means real or personal property within the Service Area subject to ad valorem taxes imposed by the District.
III. BOUNDARIES PROPOSED LAND USE/POPULATION PROJECTIONS/ ASSESSED VALUATION
The area of the Districts Boundaries includes approximately 100 acres. A legal description of the District Boundaries is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A District Boundary Map is attached
hereto as Exhibit B. A vicinity map is attached hereto as Exhibit C. It is anticipated that a
District’s boundaries may change from time to time as it undergoes inclusions and exclusions pursuant to Section 32-1-401, et seq., C.R.S., and Section 32-1-501, et seq., C.R.S., subject to the limitations set forth in Section IV below.
Approval of this Service Plan by the City does not imply approval of the development of a
specific area within the Service Area, nor does it imply approval of the number of residential units
5
identified in this Service Plan or any of the exhibits attached thereto, unless the same is contained within an Approved Development Plan.
IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED POWERS, IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
A. Powers of the Districts and Service Plan Amendment.
The Districts shall have the power and authority to provide the Public Improvements and related ownership, operation and maintenance services within and without the boundaries of the Districts as such power and authority is described in the Special District Act, and other applicable
statutes, common law and the State constitution, subject to the limitations set forth herein.
1. Operations and Maintenance Limitation. The purpose of the Districts is to plan for, design, acquire, construct, install, relocate, redevelop, finance, own, and maintain the Public Improvements. The Districts shall dedicate the Public Improvements to the City or other appropriate jurisdiction in a manner
contemplated under the Approved Development Plan and other rules and regulations of the City and applicable provisions of the City Code. The Districts shall be authorized to own, operate and maintain Public Improvements not otherwise dedicated to the City or other public entity consistent with the Approved Development Plan.
2. Fire Protection Limitation. The Districts shall not be authorized to plan for, design, acquire, construct, install, relocate, redevelop, finance, operate or maintain fire protection facilities or services, unless such facilities and services are provided pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement with the City. The authority to plan for, design, acquire, construct, install, relocate, redevelop or finance fire
hydrants and related improvements installed as part of the water system shall not be limited by this provision. Fire protection and emergency response services will be provided by the West Metro Fire Protection District.
3. Construction Standards Limitation. The Districts will ensure that
Public Improvements constructed by the Districts are designed and constructed in
accordance with the standards and specifications of the City and of other governmental entities having proper jurisdiction, including the Colorado Department of Health, and other applicable local, state or federal agencies.
4. Inclusion Limitation. The Districts shall not include within their
boundaries any property outside the Service Area without the prior written consent
of the City.
5. Overlap Limitation. The Districts shall not consent to the organization of any other district organized under the Special District Act within the Service Area which will overlap the boundaries of the Districts unless the
aggregate mill levy for payment of Debt of such proposed districts will not at any
time exceed the Maximum Debt Mill Levy of the Districts.
6
6. Total Debt Issuance Limitation. The Districts collectively shall not issue Debt in excess of One-Hundred Ten Million Dollars ($110,000,000). Debt that is issued for the purpose of refunding outstanding Debt shall not be counted
against such total debt issuance limitation, provided, however, that if the aggregate principal amount of the refunding Debt exceeds the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the refunded Debt, the increase in principal amount shall be counted against such debt limitation.
7. Privately Placed Debt Limitation. Prior to the issuance of any
privately placed Debt, the issuing District shall obtain the certification of an External Financial Advisor substantially as follows:
We are [I am] an External Financial Advisor within the meaning of the Districts’ Service Plan.
We [I] certify that (1) the net effective interest rate (calculated as
defined in Section 32-1-103(12), C.R.S.) to be borne by [insert the designation of Debt] does not exceed a reasonable current [tax-exempt] [taxable] interest rate, using criteria deemed appropriate by us [me] and based upon our [my] analysis of comparable high yield securities; and (2) the structure of [insert designation of the Debt],
including maturities and early redemption provisions, is reasonable considering the financial circumstances of the District.
8. Fee Limitation. The Districts may impose and collect Fees as a source of revenue for repayment of Debt, capital costs, and/or for operations and maintenance. No Fee related to repayment of Debt shall be authorized to be
imposed upon or collected from Taxable Property owned or occupied by an End User. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, the restrictions in this definition shall not apply to any Fee imposed upon or collected from Taxable Property for the purpose of funding operation and maintenance costs of the Districts, including the
establishment of a reserve fund for future repairs or replacement costs.
9. Consolidation Limitation. The Districts shall not file a request with any Court to consolidate with another district organized under the Special District Act, without the prior written consent of the City.
10. Bankruptcy Limitation. All of the limitations contained in this
Service Plan, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the Maximum Debt
Mill Levy, Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term and the Fees have been established under the authority of the City to approve a Service Plan with conditions pursuant to Section 32-1-204.5, C.R.S. It is expressly intended that such limitations:
a) shall not be subject to set-aside for any reason or by any court of
competent jurisdiction, absent a Service Plan Amendment; and
7
b) are, together with all other requirements of State law, included in the “political or governmental powers” reserved to the State under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C.) Section 903, and are also
included in the “regulatory or electoral approval necessary under applicable nonbankruptcy law” as required for confirmation of a Chapter 9 Bankruptcy Plan under Bankruptcy Code Section 943(b)(6).
Any Debt, issued with a pledge or which results in a pledge, that exceeds the Maximum
Debt Mill Levy and the Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term, shall be deemed a material modification of this Service Plan pursuant to Section 32-1-207, C.R.S. and shall not be an authorized issuance of Debt unless and until such material modification has been approved by the City as part of a Service Plan Amendment.
11. Service Plan Amendment Requirement. This Service Plan has been
designed with sufficient flexibility to enable the Districts to provide Public Improvements and services and facilities under evolving circumstances without the need for numerous amendments. The Districts may seek formal approval from the City of modifications to this Service Plan which are not material, but for which the Districts may desire a written amendment and approval by the City. Such approval
may be evidenced by any instrument executed by the City Manager, City Attorney, or other designated representative of the City as to the matters set forth therein and shall be conclusive and final.
B. Preliminary Engineering Survey.
The Districts shall have authority to provide for the planning, design, acquisition,
construction, installation, relocation, redevelopment, maintenance and financing of the Public Improvements within and without the boundaries of the Districts. An estimate of the costs of the Public Improvements which may be planned for, designed, acquired, constructed, installed, relocated, redeveloped, maintained or financed was prepared based upon a preliminary engineering
survey and estimates derived from the preliminary zoning on the property in the Service Area and
is approximately Ninety-Nine Million Dollars ($99,000,000). The Capital Plan attached hereto as Exhibit E includes a description of the types of capital facilities to be developed by the Districts, an estimate of the cost of the proposed facilities, and a capital expenditure plan correlating expenditures with development. The actual Public Improvements to be constructed will be
determined by the Approved Development Plan, notwithstanding the Capital Plan, and are
necessary and for the benefit of all homeowners, residents and property owners within the Districts in order to provide for a coordinated system of Public Improvements for the development of the Project.
All of the Public Improvements constructed by the Districts will be designed in such a way
as to assure that the Public Improvements will be compatible with those of the City and shall be in
accordance with the requirements of the City. All construction cost estimates are based on the assumption that construction conforms to applicable local, State or Federal requirements. The actual Public Improvements to be constructed will be determined by the City and the Districts, and variations from the Capital Plan or Financial Plan shall not constitute a material modification of
this Service Plan. All Public Improvements contemplated for the Project benefit the residents,
8
property owners, and taxpayers of the District, and such benefit accrues to such residents, property owners, and taxpayers of the District regardless of the specific or general location of the various Public Improvements.
The Public Improvements generally depicted and described in the Capital Plan or Financial Plan have been presented for illustration only, and the exact design, subphasing of construction and location of the Public Improvements will be determined at the time of City approvals and public works approval and such decisions shall not be considered to be a material modification of the Service Plan.
C. Other Powers.
The Districts shall also have the following authority:
1. Service Plan Amendments. To amend the Service Plan as needed, subject to the appropriate statutory procedures and City Code.
2. Phasing, Deferral. Without amending this Service Plan, to defer, forego,
reschedule, or restructure the financing and/or construction of Public Improvements and facilities, to better accommodate the pace of growth, resource availability, and potential inclusions of property within the Districts.
3. Additional Services. Except as specifically provided herein, to provide
such additional services and exercise such powers as are expressly or impliedly granted by Colorado law, as may be amended from time to time.
D. Facilities to be Constructed and/or Acquired.
The Districts propose to provide and/or acquire Public Improvements necessary and for the
benefit of the Project, and the residents, property owners and taxpayers of the Districts as are set
forth in the Approved Development Plan.
Notwithstanding anything in this Service Plan to the contrary, the Districts shall have the authority to enter into any intergovernmental agreements deemed necessary to effectuate the plans of the Districts without further approval from the City. In addition, the Districts shall have the
authority to seek electorate authorization to effectuate all purposes set forth in this Service Plan in
order to comply with all applicable constitutional and statutory requirements.
V. FINANCIAL PLAN
A. General.
The Districts shall be authorized to provide for the planning, design, acquisition,
construction, installation, relocation and/or redevelopment of the Public Improvements by and
through the proceeds of Debt to be issued by the Districts. The Financial Plan for the Districts shall be to issue such Debt as the Districts can reasonably pay within the Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term from revenues derived from the Maximum Debt Mill Levy, Fees and other legally available revenues. A Financial Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit F, which provides
preliminary projections demonstrating that the Districts can reasonably discharge the proposed
9
Debt, consistent with the requirements of the Special District Act. The total Debt that the Districts collectively shall be permitted to issue shall not exceed One-Hundred Ten Million Dollars ($110,000,000) and shall be permitted to be issued in amounts and on a schedule in such year or
years as the issuing District, in its discretion, determines is necessary to serve development as it occurs and can be issued within the parameters established herein. All bonds and other Debt issued by the Districts may be payable from any and all legally available revenues of the Districts, including, but not limited to, ad valorem taxes and Fees. The Districts will also rely upon various other revenue sources authorized by law. These will include the power to assess Fees, rates, tolls,
penalties, or charges as provided in Section 32-1-1001(1), C.R.S., as amended from time to time.
The parameters in the Financial Plan are based upon current estimates and will change based on actual development of the Project. The Financial Plan is one projection of the issuance of Debt by the Districts based on certain development assumptions. It is expected that actual development (including, but not limited to product types, market values, and absorption rates) will
vary from that projected and illustrated in the Financial Plan, which variations and deviations shall not constitute a material modification of this Service Plan.
Notwithstanding anything in this Service Plan to the contrary, the projections set forth in this Service Plan and the Financial Plan are projections based upon current market conditions. The actual amounts, interest rates, and terms of any Debt will likely change from that reflected in the
Financial Plan, and each issue of Debt will be based upon the actual conditions existing at the time of issuance, subject to the limitations of the Service Plan.
B. Maximum Voted Interest Rate and Maximum Underwriting Discount.
The interest rate on any Debt is expected to be the market rate at the time the Debt is issued.
In the event of a default, the proposed maximum interest rate on any Debt is not expected to exceed
eighteen percent (18%). The proposed maximum underwriting discount will be five percent (5%). Debt, when issued, will comply with all relevant requirements of this Service Plan, State law and Federal law as then applicable to the issuance of public securities.
C. Maximum Debt Mill Levy.
The “Maximum Debt Mill Levy” shall be the maximum mill levy a District is permitted to
impose upon the taxable property within such District for payment of Debt, and shall be determined as follows:
1. For the portion of any aggregate Debt which exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the District’s assessed valuation, the Maximum Debt Mill Levy for such
portion of Debt shall be sixty-seven (67) mills less the number of mills necessary
to pay unlimited mill levy Debt described in Section V.C.2 below; provided that if, on or after January 1, 2025, changes are made in the method of calculating assessed valuation or any constitutionally mandated tax credit, cut or abatement; the mill levy limitation applicable to such Debt may be increased or decreased to reflect
such changes, such increases or decreases to be determined by the Board in good
faith (such determination to be binding and final) so that to the extent possible, the actual tax revenues generated by the mill levy, as adjusted for changes occurring after January 1, 2025, are neither diminished nor enhanced as a result of such
10
changes. For purposes of the foregoing, a change in the ratio of actual valuation shall be deemed to be a change in the method of calculating assessed valuation.
2. For the portion of any aggregate Debt which is equal to or less than
fifty percent (50%) of the District’s assessed valuation, either on the date of issuance or at any time thereafter, the mill levy to be imposed to repay such portion of Debt shall not be subject to the Maximum Debt Mill Levy and, as a result, the mill levy may be such amount as is necessary to pay the Debt service on such Debt, without limitation of rate.
3. For purposes of the foregoing, once Debt has been determined to be within Section V.C.2 above, such that the District is entitled to pledge to its payment an unlimited ad valorem mill levy, such District may provide that such Debt shall remain secured by such unlimited mill levy, notwithstanding any subsequent change in such District’s Debt to assessed ratio. All Debt issued by the
District must be issued in compliance with the requirements of Section 32-1- 1101, C.R.S. and all other requirements of State law. To the extent that the District is composed of or subsequently organized into one or more subdistricts as permitted under Section 32-1-1101, C.R.S., the term “District” as used herein shall
be deemed to refer to the District and to each such subdistrict separately, so that each of the subdistricts shall be treated as a separate, independent district for purposes of the application of the definitions and limitations herein.
D. Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term.
The District shall not impose a levy for repayment of any and all Debt (or use the proceeds
of any mill levy for repayment of Debt) on any single property developed for residential uses which exceeds forty (40) years after the year of the initial imposition of such Debt mill levy unless a majority of the Board of the District imposing the mill levy are residents of the District and have voted in favor of a refunding of a part or all of the Debt and such refunding will result in a net
present value savings as set forth in Section 11-56-101, C.R.S.; et seq., as may be amended from
time to time.
E. Debt Repayment Sources.
All bonds and other Debt issued by the Districts may be payable from any and all legally available revenues of the Districts, including, but not limited to, general ad valorem taxes and Fees.
The Districts will also rely upon various other revenue sources authorized by law. These will
include the power to assess Fees, rates, tolls, penalties, or charges as provided in Section 32-1-1001(1), C.R.S., as amended from time to time. In no event shall the debt service mill levy in the District exceed the Maximum Debt Mill Levy or the Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term, except pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement between a District and the City.
F. Security for Debt.
The Districts shall not pledge any revenue or property of the City as security for the indebtedness. Approval of this Service Plan shall not be construed as a guarantee by the City of payment of any of the Districts’ obligations; nor shall anything in the Service Plan be construed
11
so as to create any responsibility or liability on the part of the City in the event of default by any District in the payment of any such obligation.
G. TABOR Compliance.
The Districts will comply with the provisions of TABOR. In the discretion of the Board, a District may set up other qualifying entities to manage, fund, construct and operate facilities, services, and programs. To the extent allowed by law, any entity created by a District will remain under the control of the District’s Board.
H. Districts’ Operating Costs.
The estimated cost of planning services, engineering services, legal services and administrative services, together with the estimated costs of the Districts’ initial operations, are anticipated to be One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), which will be eligible for reimbursement from Debt proceeds.
In addition to the capital costs of the Public Improvements, the Districts will require
operating funds for administration and to plan and cause the Public Improvements to be constructed owned, operated and maintained by the Districts. The initial operating budget is estimated to be Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) which is anticipated to be derived from property taxes and other revenues.
The Maximum Debt Mill Levy for the repayment of Debt shall not apply to the District’s
ability to increase its mill levy as necessary for the provision of administrative, operation and maintenance services.
I. Special Improvement District.
1. Consistent with the provisions of Section 32-1-1101.7, C.R.S., the Districts shall be authorized:
a. To establish a special improvement district within the boundaries of the Districts;
b. To levy and collect assessments;
c. To issue bonds or other obligations payable from the
assessments to finance all or part of the costs of the Public
Improvements; and
d. To undertake and carry out any other activities related or necessary to the foregoing.
2. Assessments levied by the Districts pursuant to Section 32-1-
1101.7, C.R.S., shall not be considered property taxes or Fees.
3. Assessments levied by the Districts pursuant to Section 32-1-1101.7, C.R.S., may be used to finance, plan, acquire, and construct the Public
12
Improvements, pay Debt service, and for any other purpose permitted by the Special District Act.
4. Assessments levied by the Districts pursuant to Section 32-1-
1101.7, C.R.S. or any successor statute, shall be due and payable at or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any unit, structure or other appurtenance, excluding Public Improvements, on the property assessed. Assessments related to the repayment of Debt shall not be authorized to be imposed upon or collected from Taxable Property owned or occupied by an End User.
5. Any bonds or other obligations issued by the Districts payable solely from assessments (and including the revenue derived from any action to enforce the collection of such assessments and the revenue derived from the sale or other disposition of property acquired by the Districts from any action to enforce the collection of such assessments) shall be considered revenue bonds, shall not be
considered Debt, and shall not be subject to or count towards the Districts’ total debt issuance limitation set forth in this Service Plan.
6. The Districts may enter into one or more intergovernmental agreements with any one or more of the Districts regarding establishing special improvement district(s), levying and collecting assessments, issuing bonds or other
obligations payable from the assessments, and/or financing the Public Improvements with such revenues and funds. Any such intergovernmental agreements among the Districts shall not be considered Debt and shall not be subject to or count towards the total debt issuance limitation set forth in this Service Plan.
VI. ANNUAL REPORT
A. General.
The Districts shall be responsible for submitting an annual report to the City Clerk at the City’s administrative offices no later than September 1st of each year following the year in which
the Service Plan is approved by the City Council. The annual report shall reflect activity and
financial events of the District through the preceding December 31st (the “Report Year”).
J. Reporting of Significant Events.
The annual report shall include information as to any of the following:
I. A narrative summary of the progress of the Districts in
implementing its service plan for the Report Year.
II. Except when an exemption from audit has been granted for the report year under the Local Government Audit Law, the audited financial statements of the Districts for the Report Year including a statement of financial condition (i.e. balance sheet) as of December 31 of the report year and the statement
of operations (i.e. revenues and expenditures) for the Report Year.
13
III. Unless disclosed within a separate schedule to the financial statements, a summary of the capital expenditures incurred by the Districts in development of public facilities in a Report Year, as well as any capital
improvements or projects proposed to be undertaken in the five (5) years following the report year.
IV. Unless disclosed within a separate schedule to the financial statements, a summary of the financial obligations of the Districts at the end of the report year, including the amount of outstanding indebtedness, the amount and
terms of any new District indebtedness or long-term obligations issued in the Report Year, the amount of payment or retirement of existing indebtedness of the Districts in the Report Year, the total assessed valuation of all taxable properties within the Districts as of January 1 of the Report Year, and the current mill levy of the Districts pledged to debt retirement in the Report Year.
V. The Districts’ budget for the calendar year in which the annual report is submitted.
VI. A summary of residential and commercial development which has occurred within the Districts for the report year.
VII. A summary of all fees, charges and assessments imposed by the
Districts as of January 1 of the Report Year.
VIII. The name, business address and telephone number of each member of the Board and its chief administrative officer and general counsel, together with the date, place and time of the regular meetings of the Board.
IX. DISSOLUTION
Upon an independent determination of the City Council that the purposes for which the Districts was created have been accomplished, the Districts agree to file a petition in the appropriate District Court for dissolution, pursuant to the applicable State statutes. In no event shall a dissolution occur until the Districts have provided for the payment or discharge of all of
their outstanding indebtedness and other financial obligations as required pursuant to State statutes.
X. DISCLOSURE TO PURCHASERS
The Districts will use reasonable efforts to assure that all developers of the property located within the Districts provides written notice to all purchasers of property in the Districts regarding the Maximum Debt Mill Levy, as well as a general description of the Districts’ authority to impose
and collect rates, Fees, tolls and charges. The form of notice shall be filed with the City prior to
the initial issuance of the Debt of the Districts and shall be recorded in the Service Area. The Districts will use reasonable efforts and due diligence to cause each developer and home builder to require that each home buyer is asked to acknowledge receipt of such notice at the time of entering into the purchase contract.
14
To ensure that potential residential buyers are educated about the Districts, the Districts will provide the notice to the developer or home builders for prominent display at all sales offices, and inspect the sales offices within the Service Area on a quarterly basis to assure the information
provided is accurate and prominently displayed.
XI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
The form of the intergovernmental agreement, relating to the limitations imposed on the Districts’ activities, is attached hereto as Exhibit D. The Districts shall approve the intergovernmental agreement in the form attached as Exhibit D at their first Board meeting after
approval of the Service Plan by the City. The City Council shall approve the intergovernmental agreement in the form attached as Exhibit D at the public hearing approving the Service Plan.
XII. CONCLUSION
It is submitted that this Service Plan for the Districts, as required by Section 32-1-203(2), C.R.S.,
establishes that:
1. There is sufficient existing and projected need for organized service in the area to be serviced by the Districts;
2. The existing service in the area to be served by the Districts is inadequate for present and projected needs;
3. The Districts are capable of providing economical and sufficient service
to the area within its proposed boundaries; and
4. Adequate service is not, and will not be, available to the area through the City or county or other existing municipal or quasi-municipal corporations, including existing special districts, within a reasonable time and on a comparable basis.
5. The facility and service standards of the Districts are compatible with the facility and service standards of the City within which the special districts are to be located and each municipality which is an interested party under Section 32-1-204(1), C.R.S.
6. The proposal is in substantial compliance with a master plan adopted
pursuant to Section 30-28-108, Colorado Revised Statutes;
7. The proposal is in compliance with any duly adopted City, regional or state long-range water quality management plan for the area.
8. The creation of the Districts is in the best interests of the area proposed to be served.
A-1
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of the Districts
DISTRICT PARCEL NO. 1 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 3
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 26 AND THE NORTHEAST
1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 00°03’59” E, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27 A
DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH
AVENUE;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1) S 00°03'59" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
2) N 89°37'55" E A DISTANCE OF 734.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE
THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
1) N 89°37'55" E A DISTANCE OF 103.03 FEET;
2) N 00°31'12" W A DISTANCE OF 8.00 FEET;
3) N 89°37'55" E A DISTANCE OF 148.83 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF
THAT UNPLATTED PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED AT 2024008375;
THENCE S 00°09'47" E ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY AND THE WESTERLY BOUNDARIES
OF THOSE UNPLATTED PARCELS OF LAND RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.’S 2009029437,
2016133249, 2013121563 AND THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF CAL-HAR ESTATES, A
SUBDIVISION RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 56635273, A DISTANCE OF 1288.78 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID CAL-HAR ESTATES;
THENCE N 89°41'29" E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CAL-HAR ESTATES
A DISTANCE OF 269.47 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND
RECORDED IN BOOK 2652 AT PAGE 50;
THENCE S 00°11'43" E ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND
RECORDED IN BOOK 2652 AT PAGE 50 A DISTANCE OF 878.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER THEREOF, SAID POINT BEING A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LUCOCK
SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 52520515;
THENCE S 89°45'02" W ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LUCOCK SUBDIVISION, AND
BEBBER SUBDIVISION RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 52521855 A DISTANCE OF 842.54 FEET
TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EXEMPLA/LUTHERAN HOSPICE FINAL PLAT RECORDED AT
RECEPTION NO. 2005024146;
DISTRICT PARCEL NO. 1 DESCRIPTION SHEET 2 OF 3
THENCE N 06°06'22" W A DISTANCE OF 64.75 FEET;
THENCE N 68°35'16" W A DISTANCE OF 75.38 FEET;
THENCE N 45°14'38" W A DISTANCE OF 325.83 FEET;
THENCE N 44°45'27" E A DISTANCE OF 543.93 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD OF N 22°17'49" E 420.25 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 550.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 431.21 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 44°55'16";
THENCE N 00°09'49" W A DISTANCE OF 659.65 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD OF N 09°20'11" E 155.14 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 470.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 155.86 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 19°00'00";
THENCE N 18°50'11" E A DISTANCE OF 125.09 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD OF N 09°14'03" E 106.76 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 320.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 107.26 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 19°12'16";
THENCE N 00°22'05" W A DISTANCE OF 27.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 36°29’36” W A DISTANCE OF 659.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 09°22'33" W A DISTANCE OF 76.80 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD OF S 04°27'48" W 122.63 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 716.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 122.78 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 9°49'30";
THENCE S 00°26'57" E A DISTANCE OF 493.78 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD OF S 22°50'45" E 454.93 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 597.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 466.73 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 44°47'36";
THENCE S 45°14'33" E A DISTANCE OF 412.70 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD OF S 21°46'27" W 423.48 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 570.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 433.87 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 43°36'45";
THENCE S 00°01'56" E A DISTANCE OF 293.15 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF WEST 32ND AVENUE RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. F2016155;
THENCE S 89°29'54" W ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 99.56
FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT UNPLATTED PARCEL OF LAND
RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2013022417;
THENCE N 00°04'02" W ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY AND THE EASTERLY BOUNDARIES
OF THOSE UNPLATTED PARCELS OF LAND RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.’S 78077627,
2024035609, 2021028184 AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 414.91 FEET TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN BOOK 940 AT PAGE 312;
THENCE S 89°29'54" W ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND
RECORDED IN BOOK 940 AT PAGE 312 AND THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF QUINTANA
SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2006000557 AND THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUDLEY ACRES, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.
61876402 A DISTANCE OF 607.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION,
A SUBDIVISION RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 81068093;
THENCE N 00°06'57" W ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LOTS 1-8 OF SAID LUTHERAN
SUBDIVISION AND A VACATION PARCEL RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 88017464 AND LOTS
18-24, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 41322356 A DISTANCE OF
1608.34 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 17 OF SAID LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION;
DISTRICT PARCEL NO. 1 DESCRIPTION SHEET 3 OF 3
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 17, LONGVIEW
SUBDIVISION AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1) N 89°33'58" E A DISTANCE OF 199.50 FEET;
2) N 00°04'28" W A DISTANCE OF 122.83 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
LOT 1, FINAL PLAT OF FOOTHILLS MEDICAL CENTER, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED AT
RECEPTION NO. 87042655;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF OF SAID LOT 1,
FINAL PLAT OF FOOTHILLS MEDICAL CENTER THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
1) S 80°54'57" E A DISTANCE OF 33.34 FEET;
2) S 78°09'40" E A DISTANCE OF 75.09 FEET;
3) S 73°33'47" E A DISTANCE OF 115.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 2,143,361 SQUARE FEET, OR 49.2048 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 1 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 30°04'21" W A DISTANCE OF 671.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DISTRICT PARCEL NO. 2 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 00°03’59” E, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27 A
DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH
AVENUE;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1) S 00°03'59" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
2) N 89°37'55" E A DISTANCE OF 186.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE N 89°37'55" E CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST
38TH AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 547.93 FEET;
THENCE S 00°22'05" E A DISTANCE OF 27.13 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD OF S 09°14'03" W 106.76 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 320.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 107.26 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 19°12'16";
THENCE S 18°50'11" W A DISTANCE OF 125.09 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD OF S 09°20'11" W 155.14 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 470.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 155.86 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 19°00'00";
THENCE S 00°09'49" E A DISTANCE OF 76.59 FEET;
THENCE S 89°50'11" W A DISTANCE OF 479.26 FEET;
THENCE N 01°38'00" E A DISTANCE OF 478.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 243,278 SQUARE FEET, OR 5.5849 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 2 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S29°14'32"W A DISTANCE OF 673.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF ROCKY
MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DISTRICT PARCEL NO. 3 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 26 AND THE NORTHEAST
1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 36°29’36” W A DISTANCE OF 659.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE A DISTANCE OF 75.51 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY
MOUNTAIN DITCH;
THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH THE FOLLOWING SIX (6)
COURSES:
1) S 40°40'01" E A DISTANCE OF 132.23 FEET;
2) S 53°11'25" E A DISTANCE OF 178.26 FEET;
3) S 59°10'16" E A DISTANCE OF 137.21 FEET;
4) S 66°03'36" E A DISTANCE OF 192.36 FEET;
5) S 62°35'28" E A DISTANCE OF 234.92 FEET;
6) S 87°33'19" E A DISTANCE OF 170.33 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD OF S 23°49'05" W 393.12 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 550.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 402.01 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 41°52'44";
THENCE S 44°45'27" W A DISTANCE OF 606.04 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD OF S 44°10'09" W 11.71 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 570.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 11.71 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 1°10'38";
THENCE N 45°14'33" W A DISTANCE OF 412.70 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD OF N 22°50'45" W 454.93 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 597.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 466.73 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 44°47'36";
THENCE N 00°26'57" W A DISTANCE OF 493.78 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD OF N 04°27'48" E 122.63 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 716.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 122.78 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 9°49'30";
THENCE N 09°22'33" E A DISTANCE OF 76.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 783,945 SQUARE FEET, OR 17.9969 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 3 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 28°25'03" W A DISTANCE OF 675.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DISTRICT PARCEL NO. 4 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 26 AND THE NORTHEAST
1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 00°03’59” E, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27 A
DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH
AVENUE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1) S 00°03'59" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
2) N 89°37'55" E A DISTANCE OF 186.51 FEET;
THENCE S 01°38'00" W A DISTANCE OF 478.62 FEET;
THENCE N 89°50'11" E A DISTANCE OF 479.26 FEET;
THENCE S 00°09'49" E A DISTANCE OF 583.06 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD OF S 01°21'27" W 29.20 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 550.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 29.20 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 3°02'32" TO A POINT ON THE
CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH;
THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7)
COURSES:
1) N 87°33'19" W A DISTANCE OF 170.33 FEET;
2) N 62°35'28" W A DISTANCE OF 234.92 FEET;
3) N 66°03'36" W A DISTANCE OF 192.36 FEET;
4) N 59°10'16" W A DISTANCE OF 137.21 FEET;
5) N 53°11'25" W A DISTANCE OF 178.26 FEET;
6) N 40°40'01" W A DISTANCE OF 132.23 FEET;
7) N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 195.51 FEET;
THENCE N 09°22'33" E A DISTANCE OF 350.39 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD OF N 04°18'15" E 100.78 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 570.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 100.91 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 10°08'37";
THENCE N 00°46'04" W A DISTANCE OF 51.55 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE THE
FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
1) N 89°37'48" E A DISTANCE OF 51.27 FEET;
2) S 00°03'59" E A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET;
3) N 89°37'48" E A DISTANCE OF 276.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 669,921 SQUARE FEET, OR 15.3793 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 4 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 27°35'55" W A DISTANCE OF 678.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DISTRICT PARCEL NO. 5 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 26 AND THE NORTHEAST
1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 03°23’35” E A DISTANCE OF 1882.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 45°14'38" E A DISTANCE OF 325.83 FEET;
THENCE S 68°35'16" E A DISTANCE OF 75.38 FEET;
THENCE S 06°06'22" E A DISTANCE OF 64.75 FEET;
THENCE S 00°03'59" E A DISTANCE OF 417.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF WEST 32ND AVENUE;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. F2016155 THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES:
1) S 89°45'02" W A DISTANCE OF 180.07 FEET;
2) N 84°33'02" W A DISTANCE OF 25.18 FEET;
3) S 89°45'02" W A DISTANCE OF 212.17 FEET;
4) S 89°29'54" W A DISTANCE OF 100.44 FEET;
THENCE N 00°01'56" W A DISTANCE OF 293.15 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD OF N 22°21'46" E 434.33 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 570.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 445.59 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 44°47'23";
THENCE N 44°45'27" E A DISTANCE OF 62.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 307,606 SQUARE FEET, OR 7.0617 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 5 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 26°47'11" W A DISTANCE OF 681.15 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DISTRICT PARCEL NO. 6 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 00°03’59” E, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27 A
DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH
AVENUE;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE THE
FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
1) S 89°37'48" W A DISTANCE OF 276.80 FEET;
2) N 00°03'59" W A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET;
3) S 89°37'48" W A DISTANCE OF 51.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 00°46'04" E A DISTANCE OF 51.55 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD OF S 04°18'15" W 100.78 FEET, A
RADIUS OF 570.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 100.91 FEET, AND A DELTA OF 10°08'37";
THENCE S 09°22'33" W A DISTANCE OF 350.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXTENSION OF THE
SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 1, FINAL PLAT OF FOOTHILLS MEDICAL CENTER, A
SUBDIVISION RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 87042655;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY AND WESTERLY BOUNDARY AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF
OF SAID LOT 1, FINAL PLAT OF FOOTHILLS MEDICAL CENTER THE FOLLOWING TWO (2)
COURSES:
1) N 73°33'47" W A DISTANCE OF 115.53 FEET;
2) N 78°09'40" W A DISTANCE OF 75.09 FEET;
3) N 80°54'57" W A DISTANCE OF 33.34 FEET;
4) N 83°01'47" W A DISTANCE OF 57.51 FEET;
5) N 00°03'38" W A DISTANCE OF 435.22 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE;
THENCE N 89°37'48" E ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE
A DISTANCE OF 338.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 146,018 SQUARE FEET, OR 3.3521 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 6 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 25°58'49" W A DISTANCE OF 683.95 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 7 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 25°10'51" W A DISTANCE OF 686.87 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 8 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 24°23'19" W A DISTANCE OF 689.94 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 9 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 23°36'12" W A DISTANCE OF 693.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 10 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 22°49'32" W A DISTANCE OF 696.45 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 11 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 22°03'19" W A DISTANCE OF 699.90 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
DIRECTOR’S PARCEL NO. 12 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 27 BEING S 00°03'59” E AND MONUMENTED AS FOLLOWS:
- EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 13212, PER MON REC DATED 5-5-06.
- NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, BEING A FOUND 3.25” BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX,
LS 28279, PER MON REC DATED 1-11-08.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27;
THENCE S 21°17'33" W A DISTANCE OF 703.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 47°23'26" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH A DISTANCE OF
10.00 FEET;
THENCE S 42°36'34" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 47°23'26" W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE N 42°36'34" E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR
0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
B-1
EXHIBIT B
District Boundaries Map
DISTRICT 2
DISTRICT 1
DISTRICT 1DISTRICT 1
DISTRICT 1
DISTRICT 4
DISTRICT 6
DISTRICT 5
DISTRICT 3
W. 38TH AVE
DU
D
L
E
Y
S
T
R
E
E
T
W. 32ND AVE
AL
L
I
S
O
N
C
T
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27
EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 27
BA
S
I
S
O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
S
EA
S
T
L
I
N
E
O
F
T
H
E
N
E
1
/
4
S
E
C
T
.
2
7
LU
T
H
E
R
A
N
P
K
W
Y
W
.
N.
L
U
T
H
E
R
A
N
P
K
W
Y
(12) DIRECTOR'S
PARCELS
N
KT
KT ENGINEERING
KT
KT ENGINEERING
12500 W. 58th AVE. #230
ARVADA, CO 80002
PH: 720.638.5190 J:\0110\2406\SURVEY\DISTRICT\LUTHERAN DISTRICT
BOUNDARIES MAP.DWG
TITLE:
SCALE:DATE:PROJECT NO:AREA:
LOCATION:
PATH:
EXHIBIT B
98.6072 AC0110-240602.03.251"=350'
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECT. 26 & THE NE 1/4 OF SECT. 27
LUTHERAN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
0
FEET1 INCH =350'
350'175'
C-1
EXHIBIT C
City of Wheat Ridge Vicinity Map
2
N
627
PHAC 1
W. 41ST AVE.
W. 38TH AVE.
N.
L
U
T
H
E
R
A
N
PK
W
Y
ES
T
E
S
S
T
W. 35TH AVE.W. 35TH AVE.
CRO
W
N
H
I
L
L
LAK
E
W. 29TH AVE.
WA
D
S
W
O
R
T
H
B
L
V
D
LU
T
H
E
R
A
N
PK
W
Y
W
.
OLIN
G
E
R
C
R
O
W
N
HIL
L
C
E
M
E
T
E
R
Y
BA
L
S
A
M
S
T
N.
C
A
R
R
S
T
AL
L
I
S
O
N
C
T
EV
E
R
E
T
T
S
T
WHE
A
T
R
I
D
G
E
HIG
H
S
C
H
O
O
L
16609
15609 1570915509
16509 16709
SITE
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
BOUNDARY
W. 38TH AVE.
DU
D
L
E
Y
S
T
W. 32ND AVE.
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
EXHIBIT C
D-1
EXHIBIT D
Intergovernmental Agreement between District and City of Wheat Ridge
D-2
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
AND LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this ___ day of ____________, 2025, by, between and among the CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, Colorado (“City”), and LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 1, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado; LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 2, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of
the State of Colorado; and LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 3 a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado; LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 4, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado; LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 5, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado; LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 6, a
quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado; LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 7, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado; LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 8, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado; LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 9, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of
Colorado; LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 10, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado; LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 11, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado; and LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO. 12, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado (each a “District” and collectively the “Districts”). The City and the
Districts are each referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Districts was organized to provide those services and to exercise powers
as are more specifically set forth in the Service Plan for Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12,
approved by the City on February 24, 2025 (“Service Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Service Plan requires that the Districts approve this Agreement after approval of the Service Plan by the City; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Districts have determined it to be in the best interests of their
respective taxpayers, residents and property owners to enter into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, all defined terms set forth herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Service Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and mutual agreements herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
D-3
COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
1. Operations and Maintenance. The purposes of the Districts is to plan for, design, acquire, construct, install, relocate, redevelop, finance, own, and maintain the Public
Improvements. The Districts shall dedicate the Public Improvements to the City or other appropriate jurisdiction in a manner contemplated under the Approved Development Plan and other rules and regulations of the City and applicable provisions of the City Code. The Districts shall be authorized to own, operate and maintain Public Improvements not otherwise dedicated to the City or other public entity consistent with the Approved Development Plan.
2. Construction Standards. The Districts will ensure that Public Improvements constructed by the Districts are designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the City and of other governmental entities having proper jurisdiction, including the Colorado Department of Health, and other applicable local, state or federal agencies.
3. Inclusion of Property. The Districts shall not include within its boundaries any
property outside the Service Area without the prior written consent of the City.
4. Total Debt Issuance. The Districts collectively shall not issue Debt in excess of One-Hundred Ten Million Dollars ($110,000,000). Debt that is issued for the purpose of refunding outstanding District Debt shall not be counted against the total debt limitation, provided, however, that if the aggregate principal amount of the refunding Debt exceeds the outstanding aggregate
principal amount of the refunded Debt, the increase in principal amount shall be counted against such debt limitation.
5. Bankruptcy. All of the limitations contained in the Service Plan, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the Maximum Debt Mill Levy, Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term and the Fees have been established under the authority of the City to approve the
Service Plan with conditions pursuant to Section 32-1-204.5, C.R.S. It is expressly intended that such limitations:
a. shall not be subject to set-aside for any reason or by any court of competent jurisdiction, absent a Service Plan Amendment; and
b. are, together with all other requirements of State law, included in the “political or
governmental powers” reserved to the State under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C.) Section 903, and are also included in the “regulatory or electoral approval necessary under applicable nonbankruptcy law” as required for confirmation of a Chapter 9 Bankruptcy Plan under Bankruptcy Code Section 943(b)(6).
Any Debt, issued with a pledge or which results in a pledge, that exceeds the Maximum
Debt Mill Levy and the Maximum Debt Mill Levy Imposition Term, shall be deemed a material modification of this Service Plan pursuant to Section 32-1-207, C.R.S. and shall not be an authorized issuance of Debt unless and until such material modification has been approved by the City as part of a Service Plan Amendment.
6. Dissolution. Upon an independent determination of the City Council that the
purposes for which the Districts was created have been accomplished, the Districts agrees to file a
D-4
petition in the appropriate District Court for dissolution, pursuant to the applicable State statutes. In no event shall a dissolution occur until the Districts have provided for the payment or discharge of all of its outstanding indebtedness and other financial obligations as required pursuant to State
statutes.
7. Disclosure to Purchasers. The Districts will use reasonable efforts to assure that all developers of the property located within the Districts provide written notice to all purchasers of property in the Districts regarding the Maximum Debt Mill Levy, as well as a general description of the Districts’ authority to impose and collect rates, Fees, tolls and charges. The form of notice
shall be filed with the City prior to the initial issuance of the Debt by the Districts and shall be recorded in the Service Area.
8. Annual Report. The Districts shall be responsible for submitting an annual report to the City Clerk at the City’s administrative offices by no later than September 1st of each year following the year in which the Service Plan is approved by the City Council. The annual report
shall reflect activity and financial events of the District during the Report Year.
9. Maximum Debt Mill Levy. The “Maximum Debt Mill Levy” shall be the maximum mill levy a District is permitted to impose upon the taxable property within such District for payment of Debt, and shall be determined as follows:
a. For the portion of any aggregate Debt which exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the
District’s assessed valuation, the Maximum Debt Mill Levy for such portion of Debt shall be sixty-seven (67) mills less the number of mills necessary to pay unlimited mill levy Debt described in Section (b) below; provided that if, on or after January 1, 2025, changes are made in the method of calculating assessed valuation or any constitutionally mandated tax credit, cut or abatement; the mill levy
limitation applicable to such Debt may be increased or decreased to reflect such changes, such increases or decreases to be determined by the Board in good faith (such determination to be binding and final) so that to the extent possible, the actual tax revenues generated by the mill levy, as adjusted for changes occurring after
January 1, 2025, are neither diminished nor enhanced as a result of such changes.
For purposes of the foregoing, a change in the ratio of actual valuation shall be deemed to be a change in the method of calculating assessed valuation.
b. For the portion of any aggregate Debt which is equal to or less than fifty percent (50%) of the District’s assessed valuation, either on the date of issuance or at any
time thereafter, the mill levy to be imposed to repay such portion of Debt shall not
be subject to the Maximum Debt Mill Levy and, as a result, the mill levy may be such amount as is necessary to pay the Debt service on such Debt, without limitation of rate.
For purposes of the foregoing, once Debt has been determined to be within Section (b)
above, such that the District is entitled to pledge to its payment an unlimited ad valorem mill levy,
such District may provide that such Debt shall remain secured by such unlimited mill levy, notwithstanding any subsequent change in such District’s Debt to assessed ratio. All Debt issued
D-5
by the District must be issued in compliance with the requirements of Section 32-1-1101, C.R.S. and all other requirements of State law.
To the extent that the District is composed of or subsequently organized into one or more
subdistricts as permitted under Section 32-1-1101, C.R.S., the term “District” as used herein shall be deemed to refer to the District and to each such subdistrict separately, so that each of the subdistricts shall be treated as a separate, independent district for purposes of the application of the definitions and limitations herein.
10. Notices. All notices, demands, requests or other communications to be sent by one
Party to the other hereunder or required by law shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been validly given or served by delivery of same in person to the address or by courier delivery, via United Parcel Service or other nationally recognized overnight air courier service, or by depositing same in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
To the Districts: Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
2154 East Commons Ave., Suite 2000 Centennial, CO 80122 Attention: Kristin Bowers, Esq. Phone: (303) 858-1800 Fax: (303) 858-1801
Email: kbowers@wbapc.com To the City: City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
ATTN: Patrick Goff, City Manager Phone: (303) 235-2805 Email: pgoff@ci.wheatridge.co.us
With a copy to: Murray Dahl Beery & Renaud LLP
710 Kipling Street, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80215 ATTN: Gerald Dahl Phone: (303) 493-6670
Email: gdahl@mdbrlaw.com
All notices, demands, requests or other communications shall be effective upon such personal delivery or 1 business day after being deposited with United Parcel Service or other nationally recognized overnight air courier service or 3 business days after deposit in the United
States mail. By giving the other party hereto at least 10 days written notice thereof in accordance
with the provisions hereof, each of the Parties shall have the right from time to time to change its address.
11. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended, modified, changed, or terminated in whole or in part only by a written agreement duly authorized and executed by the Parties hereto
and without amendment to the Service Plan.
D-6
12. Assignment. No Party hereto shall assign any of its rights nor delegate any of its duties hereunder to any person or entity without having first obtained the prior written consent of all other Parties, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Any purported assignment or
delegation in violation of the provisions hereof shall be void and ineffectual.
13. Default/Remedies. In the event of a breach or default of this Agreement by any Party, the non-defaulting Parties shall be entitled to exercise all remedies available at law or in equity, specifically including suits for specific performance and/or monetary damages. In the event of any proceeding to enforce the terms, covenants or conditions hereof, the prevailing
Party/Parties in such proceeding shall be entitled to obtain as part of its judgment or award its reasonable attorneys’ fees.
14. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed and construed under the laws of the State of Colorado and venue shall be in the District Court in and for the county in which the Districts are located.
15. Inurement. Each of the terms, covenants and conditions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
16. Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the matters addressed herein. All prior discussions and negotiations regarding the subject matter hereof are merged herein.
17. Parties Interested Herein. Nothing expressed or implied in this Agreement is intended or shall be construed to confer upon, or to give to, any person other than the District and the City any right, remedy, or claim under or by reason of this Agreement or any covenants, terms, conditions, or provisions thereof, and all the covenants, terms, conditions, and provisions in this Agreement by and on behalf of the District and the City shall be for the sole and exclusive benefit
of the District and the City.
18. Severability. If any covenant, term, condition, or provision under this Agreement shall, for any reason, be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such covenant, term, condition, or provision shall not affect any other provision contained herein,
the intention being that such provisions are severable.
19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same document.
20. Paragraph Headings. Paragraph headings are inserted for convenience of reference only.
21. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have
meanings ascribed to them in the Service Plan.
(Signature page follows)
D-8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by the City and District as of the date first above written.
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
By: President Attest:
By:
Secretary
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
By:
Mayor
Attest:
By: Sr. Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
E-1
EXHIBIT E
Capital Plan
SUBTOTALS CONTINGENCY (20%) TOTAL
A.DISTRICT DEMO OF STRUCTURES / INFRASTRUCTURE 10,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 12,000,000$
B.DISTRICT GRADING 2,877,916$ 575,583$ 3,453,499$
C.PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS (DUDLEY, 32ND, 38TH) 1,166,019$ 233,204$ 1,399,223$
D.LUTHERAN PKWY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 2,451,816$ 490,363$ 2,942,179$
E.DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 3,396,075$ 679,215$ 4,075,290$
F.ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH IMPROVEMENTS 685,370$ 137,074$ 822,444$
G.INTERNAL PUBLIC UTILITIES 15,545,789$ 3,109,158$ 18,654,946$
H.INTERNAL PUBLIC STREETS 9,980,701$ 1,996,140$ 11,976,841$
I.LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION (PER PCS GROUP) 19,648,278$ 3,929,656$ 23,577,934$
J.DISTRICT EROSION CONTROL & INSPECTIONS 742,500$ 148,500$ 891,000$
79,793,355$
K.SLEEVING 653,400$ 130,680$ 784,080$
L.STREET LIGHTS 1,300,000$ 260,000$ 1,560,000$
M.SIGNALS 400,000$ 80,000$ 480,000$
2,824,080$
N.PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PERMIT FEES 1,595,867$ 319,173$ 1,915,041$
O.FEES - MISCELLANEOUS 600,000$ 120,000$ 720,000$
2,635,041$
P.DESIGN COSTS 6,000,000$ 1,200,000$ 7,200,000$
Q.PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION 1,994,834$ 398,967$ 2,393,801$
R.POST APPROVAL ENGINEERING / PLANNING 415,800$ 83,160$ 498,960$
S.SURVEYING 1,188,000$ 237,600$ 1,425,600$
T.MATERIAL TESTING 1,188,000$ 237,600$ 1,425,600$
12,943,961$
U.INITIAL ACCEPTANCE WORK 297,000$ 59,400$ 356,400$
V.FINAL ACCEPTANCE WORK 950,400$ 190,080$ 1,140,480$
1,496,880$
GRAND TOTAL W/CONTINGENCY =99,693,316$
CITY ACCEPTANCE COSTS TOTAL =
DRY UTILITY COSTS TOTAL =
LUTHERAN REDEVELOPMENT
01.29.2025
ITEM
DIRECT COSTS
FEES
DRY UTILITY COSTS
INDIRECT COSTS
DIRECT COSTS TOTAL =
CITY ACCEPTANCE COSTS
FEES TOTAL =
INDIRECT COSTS TOTAL =
DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE
UNIT ENGINEER'S TOTAL
PRICE UNIT EST. QUANT. COST
1 DEMO OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, PARKING LOTS, UTILITIES (PER E5X MANAGEMENT) 23,000,000.00$ LS 1.0 23,000,000.00$
TOTAL = 23,000,000.00$
DISTRICT TOTAL = 10,000,000.00$
*Demo includes:
Removal of all the hospital, excluding the newest addition in the northeast corner
Removal of West Pines buildings at 3400 N Lutheran Pkwy
Removal of Lutheran Medical Pavilion at 3455 N Lutheran Pkwy
Removal of Lutheran Medical Offices at 3555 N Lutheran Pkwy
Removal of Lutheran Medical Center at 3550 N Lutheran Pkwy
Removal of parking lots, wet and dry utilities associated with facilities referenced above
DESCRIPTION
LUTHERAN REDEVELOPMENT
DEMO
01.29.2025
DEMO
UNIT ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL
PRICE UNIT EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST
1 MOBILIZATION 50,000.00$ LS 1.0 50,000.00$ 1.0 50,000.00$ 0 -$ 0 -$
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ LS 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$ 0 -$
3 EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION 1,188,000.00$ LS 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1 1,188,000.00$ 0 -$
4 EROSION CONTROL INSPECTIONS 297,000.00$ LS 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1 297,000.00$ 0 -$
5 MISC MISC. SITE PREP.200,000.00$ LS 1.0 200,000.00$ 0.5 100,000.00$ 0 -$ 0 -$
6 OVEREX IN LOTS & 5' FROM FL IN STREETS AND ALLEYS 3.30$ CY 1,060,000.0 3,498,000.00$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$ 0 -$
7 STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 2.90$ CY 37,000.0 107,300.00$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$ 0 -$
8 OVERLOT CUT OF FILL 3.30$ CY 0.0 -$ 450,000.0 1,485,000.00$ 0 -$ 0 -$
9 ROUGH GRADE SITE 0.40$ SY 0.0 -$ 340,078.0 136,031.20$ 0 -$ 0 -$
10 RELAY TOPSOIL 3.50$ CY 0.0 -$ 37,000.0 129,500.00$ 0 -$ 0 -$
TOTAL = 3,855,300.00$ TOTAL = 1,900,531.20$ TOTAL = 1,485,000.00$ TOTAL = -$
DISTRICT TOTAL* = 1,927,650.00$ DISTRICT TOTAL* = 950,265.60$ DISTRICT TOTAL* = 742,500.00$
GRADING TOTAL = 5,755,831.20$
DISTRICT GRADING TOTAL* = 2,877,915.60$
* District Grading & Erosion Control costs are half of the total costs EROSION CONTROL TOTAL = 1,485,000.00$
DISTRICT EROSION CONTROL TOTAL* = 742,500.00$
DESCRIPTION
LUTHERAN REDEVELOPMENT
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL
01.29.2025
OVEREX GRADING OVERLOT GRADING EROSION CONTROL
UNIT ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL
PRICE UNIT EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST
1 MOBILIZATION 20,000.00$ LS 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 0.0 -$
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ LS 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 0.0 -$
3 8" PVC 99.00$ LF 11,730.0 1,161,270.00$ 1936.0 191,664.00$ 1330.0 131,670.00$ 0.0 -$
4 4' MANHOLE 9,880.00$ EA 73.0 721,240.00$ 12.0 118,560.00$ 3.0 29,640.00$ 0.0 -$
5 8" PVC END CAP 585.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
6 4" SANITARY SERVICES 2,340.00$ EA 300.0 702,000.00$ 115.0 269,100.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
7 6" PVC SOLID UNDERDRAIN - SAME TRENCH 38.00$ LF 11,730.0 445,740.00$ 1936.0 73,568.00$ 131.0 4,978.00$ 0.0 -$
8 UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUTS (2.5/MH)1,755.00$ EA 182.0 319,410.00$ 30.0 52,650.00$ 6.0 10,530.00$ 0.0 -$
9 4" UNDERDRAIN SERVICES - SAME TRENCH 2,340.00$ EA 300.0 702,000.00$ 115.0 269,100.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
10 SLIP-LINING EXISTING CLAY PIPE SEWER 200.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 4,500.0 900,000.00$
11 CONNECT TO EXISTING 6,000.00$ EA 6.0 36,000.00$ 2.0 12,000.00$ 2.0 12,000.00$ 0.0 -$
TOTAL = 4,117,660.00$ TOTAL = 1,016,642.00$ TOTAL = 218,818.00$ TOTAL = 900,000.00$
SANITARY TOTAL = 6,253,120.00$
DESCRIPTION
LUTHERAN REDEVELOPMENT
SANITARY SEWER
01.29.2025
SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOMES APARTMENTS LUTHERAN PKWY
UNIT ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL
PRICE UNIT EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST
1 MOBILIZATION 20,000.00$ LS 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ LS 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
3 5' TYPE R INLET 9,750.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 12.0 117,000.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
4 10' TYPE R INLET 13,650.00$ EA 18.0 245,700.00$ 7.0 95,550.00$ 3.0 40,950.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
5 15' TYPE R INLET 16,250.00$ EA 6.0 97,500.00$ 0.0 -$ 1.0 16,250.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
6 TYPE C INLET 6,240.00$ EA 9.0 56,160.00$ 1.0 6,240.00$ 9.0 56,160.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
7 TYPE D INLET 6,500.00$ EA 2.0 13,000.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
8 TYPE 13 INLET 6,500.00$ EA 8.0 52,000.00$ 3.0 19,500.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
9 TRIPLE TYPE 13 INLET 19,500.00$ EA 4.0 78,000.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
10 MANHOLE (4' DIA)6,500.00$ EA 2.0 13,000.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 7.0 45,500.00$ 0.0 -$
11 MANHOLE (5' DIA)9,100.00$ EA 17.0 154,700.00$ 3.0 27,300.00$ 23.0 209,300.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
12 MANHOLE (6' DIA)11,050.00$ EA 12.0 132,600.00$ 3.0 33,150.00$ 5.0 55,250.00$ 7.0 77,350.00$ 12.0 132,600.00$
13 ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH LATERAL PVC PIPE 95.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 736.0 69,920.00$ 0.0 -$
14 PVC AREA DRAIN SYSTEM 130,000.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1.1 143,000.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
15 18" DIA. RCP 120.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 5,134.0 616,080.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
16 24" DIA. RCP 133.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
17 30" DIA. RCP 187.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
18 36" DIA. RCP 215.00$ LF 5,954.0 1,280,110.00$ 1,286.0 276,490.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
19 42" DIA. RCP 277.00$ LF 650.0 180,050.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
20 48" DIA. RCP 340.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1,390.0 472,600.00$ 0.0 -$
21 60" DIA. RCP 410.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1,890.0 774,900.00$
22 18" RCP FES W/ CUTOFF WALL 3,770.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
23 24" RCP FES W/ CUTOFF WALL 4,225.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
24 30" RCP FES W/CUTOFF WALL 4,745.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
25 36" RCP FES W/CUTOFF WALL 5,200.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
26 48" RCP FES W/CUTOFF WALL 5,980.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
27 TYPE VL SOIL RIPRAP CHANNELS 72.00$ SY 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
28 OVERFLOW CUTOFF WALL 175.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 485.0 84,875.00$
29 SPILLWAY TYPE M RIPRAP 75.00$ SY 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 803.0 60,225.00$
30 OUTLET STRUCTURE W/MICROPOOL 52,000.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 4.0 208,000.00$
31 CONCRETE FOREBAY 52,000.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 8.0 416,000.00$
32 OUTFALL TYPE M RIPRAP 52.00$ SY 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
33 MAINTENANCE ACCESS (10' WIDE CONCRETE) 91.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 925.0 84,175.00$
34 TRICKLE CHANNEL (4' WIDE W/6" CURB HEAD) 250.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1,234.0 308,500.00$
34 UNDERGROUND DETENTION & INFILTRATION SYSTEM 10.00$ CF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 130,680.0 1,306,800.00$
TOTAL = 2,332,820.00$ TOTAL = 488,230.00$ TOTAL = 1,283,990.00$ TOTAL = 685,370.00$ TOTAL = 3,396,075.00$
STORM SEWER TOTAL = 8,186,485.00$
REGIONAL (PONDS)
LUTHERAN REDEVELOPMENT
STORM SEWER
01.29.2025
DESCRIPTION
SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOMES APARTMENTS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH
UNIT ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL
PRICE UNIT EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST
1 MOBILIZATION 20,000.00$ LS 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 0 -$
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ LS 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 0 -$
3 8" PVC WATERLINE 73.00$ LF 12,370.0 903,010.00$ 2,038.0 148,774.00$ 2,063.0 150,599.00$ 0 -$
4 12" PVC WATERLINE 110.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
5 8" GATE VALVE 3,796.00$ EA 110.0 417,560.00$ 22.0 83,512.00$ 14.3 54,282.80$ 0 -$
6 12" GATE VALVE 6,747.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
7 8"X8" TEE 1,612.00$ EA 28.0 45,136.00$ 4.0 6,448.00$ 2.2 3,546.40$ 0 -$
8 12"X12" TEE 2,373.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
9 12"X8" TEE 2,340.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
10 8"X8" CROSS 1,720.00$ EA 3.0 5,160.00$ 2.0 3,440.00$ 1.1 1,892.00$ 0 -$
11 12"X12" CROSS 2,002.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
12 8" BENDS (11.25, 22.5, 45,90)1,092.00$ EA 36.0 39,312.00$ 4.0 4,368.00$ 11.0 12,012.00$ 0 -$
13 12" BENDS (11.25, 22.5, 45,90)1,976.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
14 12"X8" REDUCER 1,475.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
15 8" DEPRESSION 4,509.00$ EA 19.0 85,671.00$ 6.0 27,054.00$ 4.4 19,839.60$ 0 -$
16 12" DEPRESSION 6,100.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
17 8" ARV W/VAULT 10,390.00$ EA 13.0 135,070.00$ 3.0 31,170.00$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
18 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 11,583.00$ EA 23.0 266,409.00$ 7.0 81,081.00$ 9.9 114,671.70$ 0 -$
19 CAP W/BLOWOFF 2,990.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
20 3/4" WATER SERVICE 5,170.00$ EA 300.0 1,551,000.00$ 115.0 594,550.00$ 0.0 -$ 0 -$
21 3/4" NON-POT SERVICE 5,170.00$ EA 4.0 20,680.00$ 2.0 10,340.00$ 3.0 15,510.00$ 0 -$
22 1.5" IRRIGATION SERVICE 5,170.00$ EA 4.0 20,680.00$ 2.0 10,340.00$ 3.0 15,510.00$ 0 -$
23 6" WATER SERVICE 30,000.00$ EA 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 6.0 180,000.00$ 0 -$
24 CONNECT TO EXISTING 3,250.00$ EA 10.0 32,500.00$ 1.0 3,250.00$ 1.0 3,250.00$ 0 -$
TOTAL = 3,552,188.00$ TOTAL = 1,034,327.00$ TOTAL = 601,113.50$ TOTAL = -$
WATERLINE TOTAL = 5,187,628.50$
DESCRIPTION
LUTHERAN REDEVELOPMENT
WATERLINE
01.29.2025
SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOMES APARTMENTS
UNIT ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL
PRICE UNIT EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST
1 MOBILIZATION 20,000.00$ LS 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 2.0 40,000.00$
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ LS 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 1.0 10,000.00$
3 6IN VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER 2' PAN 27.00$ LF 385.0 10,395.00$ 0.0 -$ 1,367.0 36,909.00$ 8,078.0 218,106.00$ 2,008.0 54,216.00$
5 6IN MEDIAN CURB & GUTTER 1' PAN 68.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 803.0 54,604.00$ 334.0 22,712.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
6 4IN MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER 2' PAN 64.00$ LF 9,840.0 629,760.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
7 PARKING LOT CURB 64.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 8,329.0 533,056.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
8 ROUNDABOUT CURB 64.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 145.0 9,280.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
9 ROUNDABOUT CONCRETE 23.00$ SF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1,523.0 35,029.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
10 CONCRETE ALLEY (8" THICK)13.00$ SF 185,315.0 2,409,095.00$ 38,713.0 503,269.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
11 5' WIDE X 6" THICK SIDEWALK (ADJACENT TO STREETS) 42.00$ LF 7,517.0 315,714.00$ 535.0 22,470.00$ 2,185.0 91,770.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
12 5' WIDE X 6" THICK CONCRETE TRAIL 42.00$ LF 8,776.0 368,592.00$ 2,593.0 108,906.00$ 3,452.0 144,984.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
13 6' WIDE X 6" THICK SIDEWALK (ADJACENT TO STREETS) 59.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 2,509.0 148,031.00$
14 8' WIDE X 6" THICK CONCRETE TRAIL 68.00$ LF 1,279.0 86,972.00$ 1,152.0 78,336.00$ 2,803.0 190,604.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
15 8' WIDE X 6" THICK SIDEWALK (ADJACENT TO STREETS) 68.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1,784.0 121,312.00$ 8,181.0 556,308.00$ 1,518.0 103,224.00$
16 8" CROSSPAN (532 SF)14.00$ SF 1,755.0 24,570.00$ 1,170.0 16,380.00$ 0.0 -$ 7,607.0 106,498.00$ 0.0 -$
17 HANDICAP RAMPS (30SF)2,535.00$ EA 37.0 93,795.00$ 5.0 12,675.00$ 0.0 -$ 45.0 114,075.00$ 11.0 27,885.00$
18 PREP, COMPACTION & BACKFILL LF 6.50$ LF 27,797.0 180,680.50$ 5,083.0 33,039.50$ 20,399.0 132,593.50$ 16,259.0 105,683.50$ 3,526.0 22,919.00$
19 PREP, COMPACTION & BACKFILL SF 1.60$ SF 187,070.0 299,312.00$ 39,883.0 63,812.80$ 1,523.0 2,436.80$ 7,607.0 12,171.20$ 0.0 -$
20 FIBERMESH 12.50$ CY 5,657.8 70,723.09$ 1,101.4 13,767.87$ 624.9 7,811.63$ 808.0 10,100.28$ 144.3 1,803.16$
21 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FEE 3.25$ CY 5,657.8 18,388.00$ 1,101.4 3,579.65$ 624.9 2,031.02$ 808.0 2,626.07$ 144.3 468.82$
TOTAL = 4,537,996.60$ TOTAL = 940,839.81$ TOTAL = 1,360,528.95$ TOTAL = 1,155,568.06$ TOTAL = 408,546.98$
CONCRETE TOTAL = 8,403,480.40$
OFFSITE - DUDLEY, 38TH, 32ND
LUTHERAN REDEVELOPMENT
CONCRETE
01.29.2025
DESCRIPTION
SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOMES APARTMENTS REGIONAL (PKWY)
UNIT ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL ENGINEER'S TOTAL
PRICE UNIT EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST EST. QUANT. COST
1 MOBILIZATION 20,000.00$ LS 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 1.0 20,000.00$ 2.0 40,000.00$
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ LS 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1.0 10,000.00$ 4.0 40,000.00$
3 SUBGRADE PREP 5.30$ SY 19772.0 104,791.60$ 1,934.0 10,250.20$ 27,128.0 143,778.40$ 0.0 -$ 5,460.0 28,938.00$
4 8" ROAD BASE, 2' BEHIND FLOWLINE OF CURB/WALK 15.50$ SY 19,772.0 306,466.00$ 1,934.0 29,977.00$ 3,651.0 56,590.50$ 0.0 -$ 5,460.0 84,630.00$
5 8" PARKING LOT ROAD BASE, 2' BEHIND FLOWLINE OF CURB/WALK 15.50$ SY 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 23,477.0 363,893.50$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
6 5" ASPHALT 39.00$ SY 16,853.0 657,267.00$ 1,692.0 65,988.00$ 2,742.0 106,938.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
7 8" ASPHALT 65.00$ SY 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 2,811.0 182,715.00$
8 5" PARKING LOT ASPHALT 39.00$ SY 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 19,545.0 762,255.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
9 ADJUST MANHOLES 1,005.00$ EA 40.0 40,200.00$ 5.0 5,025.00$ 18.0 18,090.00$ 3.3 3,316.50$ 0.0 -$
10 ADJUST VALVES 380.00$ EA 31.0 11,780.00$ 10.0 3,800.00$ 10.0 3,800.00$ 40.0 15,200.00$ 22.0 8,360.00$
11 ROTOMILL AND OVERLAY 18.50$ SY 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 27,678.0 512,043.00$ 0.0 -$
12 SAWCUT 5.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 1,505.0 7,525.00$ 3,556.0 17,780.00$
13 DEMO ASPHALT/ROAD BASE FOR UTILITY INSTALL 5.50$ SF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 47,861.0 263,235.50$ 0.0 -$
14 DEMO PARKING LOT FOR UTILITY INSTALL 5.50$ SF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 7,110.0 39,105.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
16 PKWY ASPHALT AND ROADBASE R&R 58.00$ SY 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 5,317.0 308,386.00$ 0.0 -$
17 PARKING LOT R&R FOR STORM SEWER INSTALL 58.00$ SF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 2,200.0 127,600.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
18 SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR OFFSITE WIDENINGS 130,000.00$ LS 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 2.0 260,000.00$
19 SIGNAGE (PER CENTERLINE LENGTH)4.00$ LF 12,013.0 48,052.00$ 1,942.0 7,768.00$ 1,355.0 5,420.00$ 5,398.0 21,592.00$ 3,556.0 14,224.00$
20 STRIPING (PER CENTERLINE LENGTH)25.00$ LF 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 5,398.0 134,950.00$ 3,233.0 80,825.00$
21 PARKING LOT STRIPING 65,000.00$ LS 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 2.5 162,500.00$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$
TOTAL = 1,188,556.60$ TOTAL = 142,808.20$ TOTAL = 1,809,970.40$ TOTAL = 1,296,248.00$ TOTAL = 757,472.00$
ASPHALT TOTAL = 5,195,055.20$
OFFSITE - DUDLEY, 38TH, 32ND
LUTHERAN REDEVELOPMENT
ASPHALT
01.29.2025
DESCRIPTION
SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOMES APARTMENTS REGIONAL (PKWY)
TRACT AREA USE COST/SF TOTAL COST
A 24,721 BUFFER/LANDSCAPE 8.75$ 216,308.75$ B 7,795 GREENWAY/LANDSCAPE 7.85$ 61,190.75$
C 7,646 GREENWAY/LANDSCAPE 7.85$ 60,021.10$ D 11,270 GREENWAY/LANDSCAPE 7.85$ 88,469.50$
E 24,655 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 443,790.00$ F 35,486 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 638,748.00$
G 3,802 GREENWAY/LANDSCAPE 7.85$ 29,845.70$ H 3,802 GREENWAY/LANDSCAPE 7.85$ 29,845.70$
I 40,373 GREENWAY/LANDSCAPE 7.85$ 316,928.05$
K 13,287 BUFFER/LANDSCAPE 6.75$ 89,687.25$
L 5,655 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 101,790.00$
M 19,981 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 359,658.00$
N 41,158 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 740,844.00$
O 30,497 BUFFER/LANDSCAPE 6.75$ 205,854.75$
W 82,818 PLAZA/BUFFER/LANDSCAPE 44.00$ 3,643,992.00$
AA 135,623 LINEAR PARKWAY 22.50$ 3,051,517.50$ BB 54,680 PLAZA/POND HARDSCAPE 37.50$ 2,050,500.00$
CC 152,726 OPEN SPACE/TRAILS/DRAINAGE 4.50$ 687,267.00$ DD 5,140 GREENWAY/LANDSCAPE 7.85$ 40,349.00$
EE 5,044 GREENWAY/LANDSCAPE 7.85$ 39,595.40$ FF 134,595 OPEN SPACE/TRAILS/DRAINAGE 5.75$ 773,921.25$
GG 3,718 ENTRY LANDSCAPE 12.50$ 46,475.00$ TOTAL 844,472 13,716,598.70$
J 26,829 BUFFER/LANDSCAPE 7.85$ 210,607.65$
P 26,370 BUFFER/LANDSCAPE 5.75$ 151,627.50$ Q 8,797 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 158,346.00$
R 6,225 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 112,050.00$ S 11,809 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 212,562.00$
T 7,454 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 134,172.00$ U 24,145 BUFFER/LANDSCAPE 5.75$ 138,833.75$
V 21,517 POCKET PARK/FOUNTAINS/FEATURES 45.00$ 968,265.00$
X 13,725 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 247,050.00$
Y 17,224 POCKET PARK 18.00$ 310,032.00$
Z 16,455 BUFFER/LANDSCAPE 5.75$ 94,616.25$
TOTAL 180,550 2,738,162.15$
UNIT QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST
EA 4 ENTRY MONUMENT 325,000.00$ 1,300,000.00$
LF 8,397 FENCING 27.00$ 226,719.00$ SF 144,939 STREETSCAPE 11.50$ 1,666,798.50$
TOTAL 3,193,517.50$
19,648,278.35$ 3,929,655.67$
23,577,934.02$
20% MOBILIZATION & CONTINGENCYLUTHERAN PROPERTY LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS GRAND TOTAL
LUTHERAN PROPERTY COST ESTIMATE
SITE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
SUBTOTAL
TRACT LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITH MULTI-FAMILY OR EXISTING BUILDING
ESTIMATE PROVIDED BY PCS GROUP
F-1
EXHIBIT F
Financial Plan
Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
General Obligation & Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2025
General Obligation Refunding & Improvement Bonds, Series 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Bond Assumptions Series 2025 Series 2035 Total
Closing Date 12/1/2025 12/1/2035
First Call Date 12/1/2030 12/1/2040
Final Maturity 12/1/2055 12/1/2065
Discharge Date 12/2/2065 12/2/2065
Sources of Funds
Par Amount 75,745,000 88,545,000
Funds on Hand 0 10,940,000
Total 75,745,000 99,485,000
Uses of Funds
Project Fund 56,509,350 26,824,275 83,333,625
Refunding Escrow 0 65,985,000
Capitalized Interest 11,361,750 0
Reserve Fund 0 6,033,000
Surplus Deposit 6,059,000 0
Cost of Issuance 1,814,900 642,725
Total 75,745,000 99,485,000
Debt Features
Projected Coverage at Mill Levy Cap 1.00x 1.00x
Tax Status Tax-Exempt Tax-Exempt
Interest Payment Type Current Current
Rating Non-Rated Non-Rated
Coupon (Interest Rate)5.000%4.000%
Annual Trustee Fee $4,000 $4,000
Biennial Reassessment
Residential 2.00%2.00%
Tax Authority Assumptions
Metropolitan District Revenue
Service Plan
Service Plan Base Year 2025
Debt Service Mills
Service Plan Mill Levy Cap 67.000
Specific Ownership Tax 6.00%
County Treasurer Fee 1.50%
U.R.A. Debt Service Mills
Base Assessed Value $0
Base Year 2026
U.R.A. Mill Levy 48.723
Through 2050
Taxing Authorities Mill Levy Proportion Contribution
R1 School General Fund 44.526 61% 27.000
Wheat Ridge 1.830 100% 1.830
West Metro Fire Protection 12.807 50% 6.404
County General Fund 26.978 50% 13.489
2/3/2025
1
Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
Development Summary
Single Family
PA-2 PA-3 PA-4 PA-4 PA-4 PA-5 PA-5 PA-6 Total
Statutory Actual
Value (2024)$680,000 $680,000 $900,000 $800,000 $725,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $725,000
2025 ---------
2026 89 26 36 39 90 42 27 66 415
2027 ---------
2028 ---------
2029 ---------
2030 ---------
2031 ---------
2032 ---------
2033 ---------
2034 ---------
2035 ---------
2036 ---------
2037 ---------
2038 ---------
2039 ---------
2040 ---------
2041 ---------
2042 ---------
2043 ---------
2044 ---------
2045 ---------
2046 ---------
2047 ---------
2048 ---------
2049 ---------
2050 ---------
2051 ---------
2052 ---------
2053 ---------
2054 ---------
2055 ---------
2056 ---------
2057 ---------
2058 ---------
2059 ---------
2060 ---------
2061 ---------
2062 ---------
2063 ---------
2064 ---------
2065 ---------
Total Units 89 26 36 39 90 42 27 66 415
Total Statutory
Actual Value $60,520,000 $17,680,000 $32,400,000 $31,200,000 $65,250,000 $50,400,000 $32,400,000 $47,850,000 $337,700,000
B Legacy MD Nos. 1-12 Service Plan 02.03.25.xlsx Dev 2/3/20252
Statutory Actual
Value (2024)
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
Total Units
Total Statutory
Actual Value
Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
Development Summary
Multi Family
PA-1PA-2PA-7-----Total
$300,000 $300,000 $300,000 -----
---------
-242------242
--321-----321
332-------332
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
332242321-----895
$99,600,000 $72,600,000 $96,300,000 -----$268,500,000
B Legacy MD Nos. 1-12 Service Plan 02.03.25.xlsx Dev 2/3/20253
Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
Assessed Value
Vacant and Improved Land1 Residential Total
Cumulative Statutory
Actual Value
Assessed Value in
Collection Year
Residential Parcels
Delivered
Biennial
Reassessment Actual Value Reduction per Unit Total Reduction Statutory Value Assessment Rate
Assessed Value in
Collection Year
Assessed Value in
Collection Year
2 Year Lag (70,000)2 Year Lag 2 Year Lag
2.00% Inflated at 2.86%
2025 41,030,000 0 - - 0 (70,000) 0 0 6.700% 0 0
2026 9,630,000 0 416 - 426,876,120 (72,002) (29,952,832) 396,923,288 6.250%0 0
2027 9,960,000 10,257,500 1 - 529,070,450 (74,061) (30,883,544) 498,186,906 6.800%0 10,257,500
2028 0 2,407,500 1 10,581,409 647,462,103 (76,179) (31,842,993) 615,619,110 6.800% 26,990,784 29,398,284
2029 0 2,490,000 -- 647,462,103 (78,358) (32,753,703) 614,708,400 6.800% 33,876,710 36,366,710
2030 0 0 - 12,949,242 660,411,345 (80,599) (33,690,459) 626,720,886 6.800% 41,862,099 41,862,099
2031 0 0 -- 660,411,345 (82,904) (34,654,006) 625,757,339 6.800% 41,800,171 41,800,171
2032 0 0 - 13,208,227 673,619,571 (85,275) (35,645,110) 637,974,461 6.800% 42,617,020 42,617,020
2033 0 0 -- 673,619,571 (87,714) (36,664,560) 636,955,011 6.800% 42,551,499 42,551,499
2034 0 0 - 13,472,391 687,091,963 (90,223) (37,713,167) 649,378,796 6.800% 43,382,263 43,382,263
2035 0 0 -- 687,091,963 (92,803) (38,791,763) 648,300,200 6.800% 43,312,941 43,312,941
2036 0 0 - 13,741,839 700,833,802 (95,457) (39,901,208) 660,932,594 6.800% 44,157,758 44,157,758
2037 0 0 -- 700,833,802 (98,188) (41,042,382) 659,791,420 6.800% 44,084,414 44,084,414
2038 0 0 - 14,016,676 714,850,478 (100,996) (42,216,194) 672,634,284 6.800% 44,943,416 44,943,416
2039 0 0 -- 714,850,478 (103,884) (43,423,578) 671,426,901 6.800% 44,865,817 44,865,817
2040 0 0 - 14,297,010 729,147,488 (106,855) (44,665,492) 684,481,996 6.800% 45,739,131 45,739,131
2041 0 0 -- 729,147,488 (109,911) (45,942,925) 683,204,563 6.800% 45,657,029 45,657,029
2042 0 0 - 14,582,950 743,730,438 (113,055) (47,256,893) 696,473,545 6.800% 46,544,776 46,544,776
2043 0 0 -- 743,730,438 (116,288) (48,608,440) 695,121,998 6.800% 46,457,910 46,457,910
2044 0 0 - 14,874,609 758,605,046 (119,614) (49,998,641) 708,606,405 6.800% 47,360,201 47,360,201
2045 0 0 -- 758,605,046 (123,035) (51,428,602) 707,176,444 6.800% 47,268,296 47,268,296
2046 0 0 - 15,172,101 773,777,147 (126,554) (52,899,460) 720,877,687 6.800% 48,185,236 48,185,236
2047 0 0 -- 773,777,147 (130,173) (54,412,385) 719,364,762 6.800% 48,087,998 48,087,998
2048 0 0 - 15,475,543 789,252,690 (133,896) (55,968,579) 733,284,111 6.800% 49,019,683 49,019,683
2049 0 0 -- 789,252,690 (137,726) (57,569,280) 731,683,410 6.800% 48,916,804 48,916,804
2050 0 0 - 15,785,054 805,037,744 (141,665) (59,215,762) 745,821,982 6.800% 49,863,320 49,863,320
2051 0 0 -- 805,037,744 (145,716) (60,909,333) 744,128,411 6.800% 49,754,472 49,754,472
2052 0 0 - 16,100,755 821,138,499 (149,884) (62,651,340) 758,487,159 6.800% 50,715,895 50,715,895
2053 0 0 -- 821,138,499 (154,170) (64,443,168) 756,695,331 6.800% 50,600,732 50,600,732
2054 0 0 - 16,422,770 837,561,269 (158,580) (66,286,243) 771,275,026 6.800% 51,577,127 51,577,127
2055 0 0 -- 837,561,269 (163,115) (68,182,029) 769,379,240 6.800% 51,455,283 51,455,283
2056 0 0 - 16,751,225 854,312,494 (167,780) (70,132,035) 784,180,459 6.800% 52,446,702 52,446,702
2057 0 0 -- 854,312,494 (172,578) (72,137,811) 782,174,683 6.800% 52,317,788 52,317,788
2058 0 0 - 17,086,250 871,398,744 (177,514) (74,200,953) 797,197,791 6.800% 53,324,271 53,324,271
2059 0 0 -- 871,398,744 (182,591) (76,323,100) 795,075,644 6.800% 53,187,878 53,187,878
2060 0 0 - 17,427,975 888,826,719 (187,813) (78,505,941) 810,320,778 6.800% 54,209,450 54,209,450
2061 0 0 -- 888,826,719 (193,185) (80,751,210) 808,075,508 6.800% 54,065,144 54,065,144
2062 0 0 - 17,776,534 906,603,253 (198,710) (83,060,695) 823,542,558 6.800% 55,101,813 55,101,813
2063 0 0 -- 906,603,253 (204,393) (85,436,231) 821,167,022 6.800% 54,949,135 54,949,135
2064 0 0 - 18,132,065 924,735,318 (210,239) (87,879,707) 836,855,611 6.800% 56,000,894 56,000,894
2065 0 0 -- 924,735,318 (216,251) (90,393,067) 834,342,252 6.800% 55,839,358 55,839,358
Total 418 287,854,625
1. Vacant land value calculated in year prior to construction as 10% build-out market value
B Legacy MD Nos. 1-12 Service Plan 02.03.25.xlsx #1 AV 2/3/20254
Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
Revenue
Total District Mill Levy Revenue U.R.A. Mill Levy Revenue
Assessed Value in
Collection Year Debt Mill Levy1 Debt Mill Levy
Collections
Specific Ownership
Taxes
Assessed Value in
Collection Year
Base Assessed
Value
Net Assessed
Value
R1 School General
Fund Wheat Ridge
67.000 Cap 99.50%6.00%$0 44.526 Mills 1.830 Mills
67.000 Target Inflated at 0.00%60.64% 100.00%
2025 00.0000000000
2026 067.0000000000
2027 10,257,500 74.772 763,139 45,788 10,257,500 0 10,257,500 276,953 18,771
2028 29,398,284 71.306 2,085,779 125,147 29,398,284 0 29,398,284 793,754 53,799
2029 36,366,710 70.426 2,548,374 152,902 36,366,710 0 36,366,710 981,901 66,551
2030 41,862,099 69.429 2,891,925 173,516 41,862,099 0 41,862,099 1,130,277 76,608
2031 41,800,171 69.532 2,891,925 173,516 41,800,171 0 41,800,171 1,128,605 76,494
2032 42,617,020 69.563 2,949,764 176,986 42,617,020 0 42,617,020 1,150,660 77,989
2033 42,551,499 69.671 2,949,764 176,986 42,551,499 0 42,551,499 1,148,890 77,869
2034 43,382,263 69.703 3,008,759 180,526 43,382,263 0 43,382,263 1,171,321 79,390
2035 43,312,941 69.815 3,008,759 180,526 43,312,941 0 43,312,941 1,169,449 79,263
2036 44,157,758 69.849 3,068,934 184,136 44,157,758 0 44,157,758 1,192,259 80,809
2037 44,084,414 69.965 3,068,934 184,136 44,084,414 0 44,084,414 1,190,279 80,674
2038 44,943,416 70.000 3,130,313 187,819 44,943,416 0 44,943,416 1,213,472 82,246
2039 44,865,817 70.121 3,130,313 187,819 44,865,817 0 44,865,817 1,211,377 82,104
2040 45,739,131 70.158 3,192,919 191,575 45,739,131 0 45,739,131 1,234,957 83,703
2041 45,657,029 70.284 3,192,919 191,575 45,657,029 0 45,657,029 1,232,740 83,552
2042 46,544,776 70.322 3,256,777 195,407 46,544,776 0 46,544,776 1,256,709 85,177
2043 46,457,910 70.454 3,256,777 195,407 46,457,910 0 46,457,910 1,254,364 85,018
2044 47,360,201 70.494 3,321,913 199,315 47,360,201 0 47,360,201 1,278,725 86,669
2045 47,268,296 70.631 3,321,913 199,315 47,268,296 0 47,268,296 1,276,244 86,501
2046 48,185,236 70.673 3,388,351 203,301 48,185,236 0 48,185,236 1,301,001 88,179
2047 48,087,998 70.816 3,388,351 203,301 48,087,998 0 48,087,998 1,298,376 88,001
2048 49,019,683 70.859 3,456,118 207,367 49,019,683 0 49,019,683 1,323,531 89,706
2049 48,916,804 71.008 3,456,118 207,367 48,916,804 0 48,916,804 1,320,754 89,518
2050 49,863,320 71.053 3,525,241 211,514 49,863,320 0 49,863,320 1,346,310 91,250
2051 49,754,472 71.209 3,525,241 211,514 49,754,472 0 49,754,472 0 0
2052 50,715,895 71.256 3,595,745 215,745 50,715,895 0 50,715,895 0 0
2053 50,600,732 71.418 3,595,745 215,745 50,600,732 0 50,600,732 0 0
2054 51,577,127 71.468 3,667,660 220,060 51,577,127 0 51,577,127 0 0
2055 51,455,283 71.637 3,667,660 220,060 51,455,283 0 51,455,283 0 0
2056 52,446,702 71.688 3,741,013 224,461 52,446,702 0 52,446,702 0 0
2057 52,317,788 71.865 3,741,013 224,461 52,317,788 0 52,317,788 0 0
2058 53,324,271 71.919 3,815,834 228,950 53,324,271 0 53,324,271 0 0
2059 53,187,878 72.103 3,815,834 228,950 53,187,878 0 53,187,878 0 0
2060 54,209,450 72.159 3,892,150 233,529 54,209,450 0 54,209,450 0 0
2061 54,065,144 72.352 3,892,150 233,529 54,065,144 0 54,065,144 0 0
2062 55,101,813 72.410 3,969,993 238,200 55,101,813 0 55,101,813 0 0
2063 54,949,135 72.612 3,969,993 238,200 54,949,135 0 54,949,135 0 0
2064 56,000,894 72.673 4,049,393 242,964 56,000,894 0 56,000,894 0 0
2065 55,839,358 72.883 4,049,393 242,964 55,839,358 0 55,839,358 0 0
Total 129,242,899 7,754,574 27,882,907 1,889,842
1. Subject to adjustment based on changes in assessment methodology
B Legacy MD Nos. 1-12 Service Plan 02.03.25.xlsx #1 Rev 2/3/20255
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
Total
Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
Revenue
U.R.A. Mill Levy Revenue Expense Total
West Metro Fire
Protection
County General
Fund
Total U.R.A. Mill
Levy
U.R.A. Mill Levy
Collections
County Treasurer
Fee Annual Trustee Fee Revenue Available
for Debt Service
12.807 Mills 26.978 Mills 48.723 Mills 99.50% 1.50%
50.00% 50.00% 56.56% Share Through 2050
000.0000000
0 0 27.558 0 0 (4,000)(4,000)
65,684 138,363 27.558 497,272 (18,906)(4,000) 1,283,293
188,252 396,553 27.558 1,425,196 (52,665)(4,000) 3,579,457
232,874 490,551 27.558 1,763,018 (64,671)(4,000) 4,395,623
268,064 564,678 27.558 2,029,428 (73,820)(4,000) 5,017,048
267,667 563,843 27.558 2,026,426 (73,775)(4,000) 5,014,091
272,898 574,861 27.558 2,066,026 (75,237)(4,000) 5,113,538
272,479 573,977 27.558 2,062,849 (75,189)(4,000) 5,110,410
277,798 585,183 27.558 2,103,124 (76,678)(4,000) 5,211,730
277,354 584,248 27.558 2,099,763 (76,628)(4,000) 5,208,420
282,764 595,644 27.558 2,140,719 (78,145)(4,000) 5,311,644
282,295 594,655 27.558 2,137,163 (78,091)(4,000) 5,308,142
287,795 606,242 27.558 2,178,807 (79,637)(4,000) 5,413,302
287,298 605,195 27.558 2,175,045 (79,580)(4,000) 5,409,596
292,891 616,975 27.558 2,217,382 (81,155)(4,000) 5,516,722
292,365 615,868 27.558 2,213,402 (81,095)(4,000) 5,512,801
298,049 627,842 27.558 2,256,439 (82,698)(4,000) 5,621,925
297,493 626,671 27.558 2,252,228 (82,635)(4,000) 5,617,777
303,271 638,842 27.558 2,295,970 (84,268)(4,000) 5,728,929
302,683 637,602 27.558 2,291,514 (84,201)(4,000) 5,724,541
308,554 649,971 27.558 2,335,967 (85,865)(4,000) 5,837,754
307,931 648,659 27.558 2,331,253 (85,794)(4,000) 5,833,111
313,898 661,227 27.558 2,376,420 (87,488)(4,000) 5,948,417
313,239 659,839 27.558 2,371,432 (87,413)(4,000) 5,943,504
319,300 672,606 27.558 2,417,318 (89,138)(4,000) 6,060,935
0 0 27.558 0 (52,879)(4,000) 3,679,876
0 0 27.558 0 (53,936)(4,000) 3,753,554
0 0 27.558 0 (53,936)(4,000) 3,753,554
0 0 27.558 0 (55,015)(4,000) 3,828,705
0 0 27.558 0 (55,015)(4,000) 3,828,705
0 0 27.558 0 (56,115)(4,000) 3,905,359
0 0 27.558 0 (56,115)(4,000) 3,905,359
0 0 27.558 0 (57,238)(4,000) 3,983,546
0 0 27.558 0 (57,238)(4,000) 3,983,546
0 0 27.558 0 (58,382)(4,000) 4,063,297
0 0 27.558 0 (58,382)(4,000) 4,063,297
0 0 27.558 0 (59,550)(4,000) 4,144,643
0 0 27.558 0 (59,550)(4,000) 4,144,643
0 0 27.558 0 (60,741)(4,000) 4,227,616
0 0 27.558 0 (60,741)(4,000) 4,227,616
6,612,896 13,930,094 50,064,160 (2,689,606) (160,000) 184,212,027
B Legacy MD Nos. 1-12 Service Plan 02.03.25.xlsx #1 Rev 2/3/20256
Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12
Debt Service
Total Net Debt Service Surplus Fund Ratio Analysis
Series 2025 Series 2035 Total
Revenue Available
for Debt Service Dated: 12/1/2025 Dated: 12/1/2035 Annual Surplus Funds on Hand
Used as a Source
Cumulative
Balance1 Released Revenue Debt Service
Coverage
Senior Debt to
Assessed Value
Series 2025:
Par: $75,745,000 Par: $88,545,000 12,118,000
Proj: $56,509,350 Proj: $26,824,275 Series 2035:
Escr: $65,985,000 -
2025 0 0 0 0 6,059,000 0 n/a n/a
2026 (4,000) 0 0 (4,000) 6,055,000 0 n/a 738%
2027 1,283,293 0 0 1,283,293 7,338,293 0 n/a 258%
2028 3,579,457 0 0 3,579,457 10,917,751 0 n/a 208%
2029 4,395,623 4,392,250 4,392,250 3,373 10,921,123 0 100%179%
2030 5,017,048 5,012,000 5,012,000 5,048 10,926,172 0 100%177%
2031 5,014,091 5,009,250 5,009,250 4,841 10,931,013 0 100%170%
2032 5,113,538 5,113,500 5,113,500 38 10,931,051 0 100%167%
2033 5,110,410 5,109,250 5,109,250 1,160 10,932,211 0 100%160%
2034 5,211,730 5,206,500 5,206,500 5,230 10,937,441 0 100%157%
2035 5,208,420 5,205,000 0 5,205,000 3,420 10,940,000 0 861 100%201%
2036 5,311,644 Refunded 5,306,800 5,306,800 4,844 0 4,844 100%197%
2037 5,308,142 5,306,200 5,306,200 1,942 0 1,942 100%189%
2038 5,413,302 5,412,800 5,412,800 502 0 502 100%185%
2039 5,409,596 5,407,200 5,407,200 2,396 0 2,396 100%177%
2040 5,516,722 5,513,600 5,513,600 3,122 0 3,122 100%172%
2041 5,512,801 5,512,400 5,512,400 401 0 401 100%164%
2042 5,621,925 5,617,600 5,617,600 4,325 0 4,325 100%158%
2043 5,617,777 5,614,800 5,614,800 2,977 0 2,977 100%150%
2044 5,728,929 5,728,000 5,728,000 929 0 929 100%144%
2045 5,724,541 5,722,400 5,722,400 2,141 0 2,141 100%135%
2046 5,837,754 5,837,400 5,837,400 354 0 354 100%129%
2047 5,833,111 5,833,000 5,833,000 111 0 111 100%119%
2048 5,948,417 5,943,600 5,943,600 4,817 0 4,817 100%112%
2049 5,943,504 5,939,400 5,939,400 4,104 0 4,104 100%103%
2050 6,060,935 6,059,600 6,059,600 1,335 0 1,335 100%95%
2051 3,679,876 3,679,000 3,679,000 876 0 876 100%89%
2052 3,753,554 3,752,200 3,752,200 1,354 0 1,354 100%86%
2053 3,753,554 3,749,600 3,749,600 3,954 0 3,954 100%80%
2054 3,828,705 3,824,000 3,824,000 4,705 0 4,705 100%76%
2055 3,828,705 3,827,200 3,827,200 1,505 0 1,505 100%70%
2056 3,905,359 3,901,800 3,901,800 3,559 0 3,559 100%66%
2057 3,905,359 3,904,800 3,904,800 559 0 559 100%60%
2058 3,983,546 3,978,800 3,978,800 4,746 0 4,746 100%55%
2059 3,983,546 3,980,800 3,980,800 2,746 0 2,746 100%49%
2060 4,063,297 4,058,400 4,058,400 4,897 0 4,897 100%43%
2061 4,063,297 4,058,400 4,058,400 4,897 0 4,897 100%37%
2062 4,144,643 4,143,600 4,143,600 1,043 0 1,043 100%31%
2063 4,144,643 4,140,400 4,140,400 4,243 0 4,243 100%24%
2064 4,227,616 4,227,000 4,227,000 616 0 616 100%18%
2065 4,227,616 4,226,600 4,226,600 1,016 0 1,016 100%0%
Total 184,212,027 35,047,750 144,207,400 179,255,150 4,956,877 10,940,000 75,877
1. Assumes $6,059,000 Deposit to Surplus Fund at Closing
B Legacy MD Nos. 1-12 Service Plan 02.03.25.xlsx CI Debt Refg 2/3/20257
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-25SP)
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION & TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2025
~~~
Service Plan
Dated Date 12/01/2025
Delivery Date 12/01/2025
Sources:
Bond Proceeds:
Par Amount 75,745,000.00
75,745,000.00
Uses:
Project Fund Deposits:
Project Fund 56,509,350.00
Other Fund Deposits:
Capitalized Interest Fund 11,361,750.00
Surplus Deposit 6,059,000.00
17,420,750.00
Cost of Issuance:
Cost of Issuance 300,000.00
Delivery Date Expenses:
Underwriter's Discount 1,514,900.00
75,745,000.00
8
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-25SP)
BOND SUMMARY STATISTICS
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION & TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2025
~~~
Service Plan
Dated Date 12/01/2025
Delivery Date 12/01/2025
Last Maturity 12/01/2055
Arbitrage Yield 5.000000%
True Interest Cost (TIC)5.170011%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)5.102011%
All-In TIC 5.204281%
Average Coupon 5.000000%
Average Life (years)19.606
Duration of Issue (years)12.134
Par Amount 75,745,000.00
Bond Proceeds 75,745,000.00
Total Interest 74,251,750.00
Net Interest 75,766,650.00
Total Debt Service 149,996,750.00
Maximum Annual Debt Service 6,059,500.00
Average Annual Debt Service 4,999,891.67
Underwriter's Fees (per $1000)
Average Takedown
Other Fee 20.000000
Total Underwriter's Discount 20.000000
Bid Price 98.000000
Par Average Average
Bond Component Value Price Coupon Life
Term Bond Due 2055 75,745,000.00 100.000 5.000% 19.606
75,745,000.00 19.606
All-In Arbitrage
TIC TIC Yield
Par Value 75,745,000.00 75,745,000.00 75,745,000.00
+ Accrued Interest
+ Premium (Discount)
- Underwriter's Discount (1,514,900.00) (1,514,900.00)
- Cost of Issuance Expense (300,000.00)
- Other Amounts
Target Value 74,230,100.00 73,930,100.00 75,745,000.00
Target Date 12/01/2025 12/01/2025 12/01/2025
Yield 5.170011%5.204281%5.000000%
9
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-25SP)
BOND PRICING
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION & TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2025
~~~
Service Plan
Maturity
Bond Component Date Amount Rate Yield Price
Term Bond Due 2055:
12/01/2026 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2027 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2028 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2029 605,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2030 1,255,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2031 1,315,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2032 1,485,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2033 1,555,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2034 1,730,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2035 1,815,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2036 2,010,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2037 2,105,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2038 2,315,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2039 2,430,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2040 2,660,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2041 2,785,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2042 3,035,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2043 3,185,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2044 3,455,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2045 3,620,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2046 3,915,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2047 4,105,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2048 4,430,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2049 4,645,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2050 4,995,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2051 2,865,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2052 3,080,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2053 3,235,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2054 3,470,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
12/01/2055 3,645,000 5.000% 5.000% 100.000
75,745,000
Dated Date 12/01/2025
Delivery Date 12/01/2025
First Coupon 06/01/2026
Par Amount 75,745,000.00
Original Issue Discount
Production 75,745,000.00 100.000000%
Underwriter's Discount (1,514,900.00) (2.000000%)
Purchase Price 74,230,100.00 98.000000%
Accrued Interest
Net Proceeds 74,230,100.00
10
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-25SP)
NET DEBT SERVICE
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION & TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2025
~~~
Service Plan
Capitalized
Period Total Interest Net
Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Fund Debt Service
12/01/2026 3,787,250 3,787,250 3,787,250
12/01/2027 3,787,250 3,787,250 3,787,250
12/01/2028 3,787,250 3,787,250 3,787,250
12/01/2029 605,000 5.000% 3,787,250 4,392,250 4,392,250
12/01/2030 1,255,000 5.000% 3,757,000 5,012,000 5,012,000
12/01/2031 1,315,000 5.000% 3,694,250 5,009,250 5,009,250
12/01/2032 1,485,000 5.000% 3,628,500 5,113,500 5,113,500
12/01/2033 1,555,000 5.000% 3,554,250 5,109,250 5,109,250
12/01/2034 1,730,000 5.000% 3,476,500 5,206,500 5,206,500
12/01/2035 1,815,000 5.000% 3,390,000 5,205,000 5,205,000
12/01/2036 2,010,000 5.000% 3,299,250 5,309,250 5,309,250
12/01/2037 2,105,000 5.000% 3,198,750 5,303,750 5,303,750
12/01/2038 2,315,000 5.000% 3,093,500 5,408,500 5,408,500
12/01/2039 2,430,000 5.000% 2,977,750 5,407,750 5,407,750
12/01/2040 2,660,000 5.000% 2,856,250 5,516,250 5,516,250
12/01/2041 2,785,000 5.000% 2,723,250 5,508,250 5,508,250
12/01/2042 3,035,000 5.000% 2,584,000 5,619,000 5,619,000
12/01/2043 3,185,000 5.000% 2,432,250 5,617,250 5,617,250
12/01/2044 3,455,000 5.000% 2,273,000 5,728,000 5,728,000
12/01/2045 3,620,000 5.000% 2,100,250 5,720,250 5,720,250
12/01/2046 3,915,000 5.000% 1,919,250 5,834,250 5,834,250
12/01/2047 4,105,000 5.000% 1,723,500 5,828,500 5,828,500
12/01/2048 4,430,000 5.000% 1,518,250 5,948,250 5,948,250
12/01/2049 4,645,000 5.000% 1,296,750 5,941,750 5,941,750
12/01/2050 4,995,000 5.000% 1,064,500 6,059,500 6,059,500
12/01/2051 2,865,000 5.000%814,750 3,679,750 3,679,750
12/01/2052 3,080,000 5.000%671,500 3,751,500 3,751,500
12/01/2053 3,235,000 5.000%517,500 3,752,500 3,752,500
12/01/2054 3,470,000 5.000%355,750 3,825,750 3,825,750
12/01/2055 3,645,000 5.000%182,250 3,827,250 3,827,250
75,745,000 74,251,750 149,996,750 11,361,750 138,635,000
11
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-25SP)
BOND DEBT SERVICE
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION & TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2025
~~~
Service Plan
Annual
Period Debt Debt
Ending Principal Coupon Interest Service Service
06/01/2026 1,893,625 1,893,625
12/01/2026 1,893,625 1,893,625 3,787,250
06/01/2027 1,893,625 1,893,625
12/01/2027 1,893,625 1,893,625 3,787,250
06/01/2028 1,893,625 1,893,625
12/01/2028 1,893,625 1,893,625 3,787,250
06/01/2029 1,893,625 1,893,625
12/01/2029 605,000 5.000% 1,893,625 2,498,625 4,392,250
06/01/2030 1,878,500 1,878,500
12/01/2030 1,255,000 5.000% 1,878,500 3,133,500 5,012,000
06/01/2031 1,847,125 1,847,125
12/01/2031 1,315,000 5.000% 1,847,125 3,162,125 5,009,250
06/01/2032 1,814,250 1,814,250
12/01/2032 1,485,000 5.000% 1,814,250 3,299,250 5,113,500
06/01/2033 1,777,125 1,777,125
12/01/2033 1,555,000 5.000% 1,777,125 3,332,125 5,109,250
06/01/2034 1,738,250 1,738,250
12/01/2034 1,730,000 5.000% 1,738,250 3,468,250 5,206,500
06/01/2035 1,695,000 1,695,000
12/01/2035 1,815,000 5.000% 1,695,000 3,510,000 5,205,000
06/01/2036 1,649,625 1,649,625
12/01/2036 2,010,000 5.000% 1,649,625 3,659,625 5,309,250
06/01/2037 1,599,375 1,599,375
12/01/2037 2,105,000 5.000% 1,599,375 3,704,375 5,303,750
06/01/2038 1,546,750 1,546,750
12/01/2038 2,315,000 5.000% 1,546,750 3,861,750 5,408,500
06/01/2039 1,488,875 1,488,875
12/01/2039 2,430,000 5.000% 1,488,875 3,918,875 5,407,750
06/01/2040 1,428,125 1,428,125
12/01/2040 2,660,000 5.000% 1,428,125 4,088,125 5,516,250
06/01/2041 1,361,625 1,361,625
12/01/2041 2,785,000 5.000% 1,361,625 4,146,625 5,508,250
06/01/2042 1,292,000 1,292,000
12/01/2042 3,035,000 5.000% 1,292,000 4,327,000 5,619,000
06/01/2043 1,216,125 1,216,125
12/01/2043 3,185,000 5.000% 1,216,125 4,401,125 5,617,250
06/01/2044 1,136,500 1,136,500
12/01/2044 3,455,000 5.000% 1,136,500 4,591,500 5,728,000
06/01/2045 1,050,125 1,050,125
12/01/2045 3,620,000 5.000% 1,050,125 4,670,125 5,720,250
06/01/2046 959,625 959,625
12/01/2046 3,915,000 5.000%959,625 4,874,625 5,834,250
06/01/2047 861,750 861,750
12/01/2047 4,105,000 5.000%861,750 4,966,750 5,828,500
06/01/2048 759,125 759,125
12/01/2048 4,430,000 5.000%759,125 5,189,125 5,948,250
06/01/2049 648,375 648,375
12/01/2049 4,645,000 5.000%648,375 5,293,375 5,941,750
06/01/2050 532,250 532,250
12/01/2050 4,995,000 5.000%532,250 5,527,250 6,059,500
06/01/2051 407,375 407,375
12/01/2051 2,865,000 5.000%407,375 3,272,375 3,679,750
06/01/2052 335,750 335,750
12/01/2052 3,080,000 5.000%335,750 3,415,750 3,751,500
06/01/2053 258,750 258,750
12/01/2053 3,235,000 5.000%258,750 3,493,750 3,752,500
06/01/2054 177,875 177,875
12/01/2054 3,470,000 5.000%177,875 3,647,875 3,825,750
06/01/2055 91,125 91,125
12/01/2055 3,645,000 5.000%91,125 3,736,125 3,827,250
75,745,000 74,251,750 149,996,750 149,996,750
12
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-25SP)
CALL PROVISIONS
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION & TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2025
~~~
Service Plan
Call Table: CALL
Call Date Call Price
12/01/2030 103.00
12/01/2031 102.00
12/01/2032 101.00
12/01/2033 100.00
13
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-25SP)
BOND SOLUTION
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION & TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2025
~~~
Service Plan
Period Proposed Proposed Debt Service Total Adj Revenue Unused Debt Service
Ending Principal Debt Service Adjustments Debt Service Constraints Revenues Coverage
12/01/2026 3,787,250 (3,787,250)(4,000)(4,000)
12/01/2027 3,787,250 (3,787,250)1,283,293 1,283,293
12/01/2028 3,787,250 (3,787,250)3,579,457 3,579,457
12/01/2029 605,000 4,392,250 4,392,250 4,395,623 3,373 100.08%
12/01/2030 1,255,000 5,012,000 5,012,000 5,017,048 5,048 100.10%
12/01/2031 1,315,000 5,009,250 5,009,250 5,014,091 4,841 100.10%
12/01/2032 1,485,000 5,113,500 5,113,500 5,113,538 38 100.00%
12/01/2033 1,555,000 5,109,250 5,109,250 5,110,410 1,160 100.02%
12/01/2034 1,730,000 5,206,500 5,206,500 5,211,730 5,230 100.10%
12/01/2035 1,815,000 5,205,000 5,205,000 5,208,420 3,420 100.07%
12/01/2036 2,010,000 5,309,250 5,309,250 5,311,644 2,394 100.05%
12/01/2037 2,105,000 5,303,750 5,303,750 5,308,142 4,392 100.08%
12/01/2038 2,315,000 5,408,500 5,408,500 5,413,302 4,802 100.09%
12/01/2039 2,430,000 5,407,750 5,407,750 5,409,596 1,846 100.03%
12/01/2040 2,660,000 5,516,250 5,516,250 5,516,722 472 100.01%
12/01/2041 2,785,000 5,508,250 5,508,250 5,512,801 4,551 100.08%
12/01/2042 3,035,000 5,619,000 5,619,000 5,621,925 2,925 100.05%
12/01/2043 3,185,000 5,617,250 5,617,250 5,617,777 527 100.01%
12/01/2044 3,455,000 5,728,000 5,728,000 5,728,929 929 100.02%
12/01/2045 3,620,000 5,720,250 5,720,250 5,724,541 4,291 100.08%
12/01/2046 3,915,000 5,834,250 5,834,250 5,837,754 3,504 100.06%
12/01/2047 4,105,000 5,828,500 5,828,500 5,833,111 4,611 100.08%
12/01/2048 4,430,000 5,948,250 5,948,250 5,948,417 167 100.00%
12/01/2049 4,645,000 5,941,750 5,941,750 5,943,504 1,754 100.03%
12/01/2050 4,995,000 6,059,500 6,059,500 6,060,935 1,435 100.02%
12/01/2051 2,865,000 3,679,750 3,679,750 3,679,876 126 100.00%
12/01/2052 3,080,000 3,751,500 3,751,500 3,753,554 2,054 100.05%
12/01/2053 3,235,000 3,752,500 3,752,500 3,753,554 1,054 100.03%
12/01/2054 3,470,000 3,825,750 3,825,750 3,828,705 2,955 100.08%
12/01/2055 3,645,000 3,827,250 3,827,250 3,828,705 1,455 100.04%
75,745,000 149,996,750 (11,361,750) 138,635,000 143,563,104 4,928,104
14
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-35RSP,35RSP)
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING & IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Dated Date 12/01/2035
Delivery Date 12/01/2035
Sources:
Bond Proceeds:
Par Amount 88,545,000.00
Other Sources of Funds:
Surplus Fund 10,940,000.00
99,485,000.00
Uses:
Project Fund Deposits:
Project Fund 26,824,275.00
Refunding Escrow Deposits:
Cash Deposit 65,985,000.00
Other Fund Deposits:
Debt Service Reserve Fund 6,033,000.00
Cost of Issuance:
Cost of Issuance 200,000.00
Delivery Date Expenses:
Underwriter's Discount 442,725.00
99,485,000.00
15
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-35RSP,35RSP)
BOND SUMMARY STATISTICS
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING & IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Dated Date 12/01/2035
Delivery Date 12/01/2035
Last Maturity 12/01/2065
Arbitrage Yield 4.000000%
True Interest Cost (TIC)4.043092%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)4.028704%
All-In TIC 4.062668%
Average Coupon 4.000000%
Average Life (years)17.419
Duration of Issue (years)11.851
Par Amount 88,545,000.00
Bond Proceeds 88,545,000.00
Total Interest 61,695,400.00
Net Interest 62,138,125.00
Total Debt Service 150,240,400.00
Maximum Annual Debt Service 10,259,600.00
Average Annual Debt Service 5,008,013.33
Underwriter's Fees (per $1000)
Average Takedown
Other Fee 5.000000
Total Underwriter's Discount 5.000000
Bid Price 99.500000
Par Average Average
Bond Component Value Price Coupon Life
Term Bond due 2065 88,545,000.00 100.000 4.000% 17.419
88,545,000.00 17.419
All-In Arbitrage
TIC TIC Yield
Par Value 88,545,000.00 88,545,000.00 88,545,000.00
+ Accrued Interest
+ Premium (Discount)
- Underwriter's Discount (442,725.00)(442,725.00)
- Cost of Issuance Expense (200,000.00)
- Other Amounts
Target Value 88,102,275.00 87,902,275.00 88,545,000.00
Target Date 12/01/2035 12/01/2035 12/01/2035
Yield 4.043092%4.062668%4.000000%
16
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-35RSP,35RSP)
BOND PRICING
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING & IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Maturity
Bond Component Date Amount Rate Yield Price
Term Bond due 2065:
12/01/2036 1,765,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2037 1,835,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2038 2,015,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2039 2,090,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2040 2,280,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2041 2,370,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2042 2,570,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2043 2,670,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2044 2,890,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2045 3,000,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2046 3,235,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2047 3,360,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2048 3,605,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2049 3,745,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2050 4,015,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2051 1,795,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2052 1,940,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2053 2,015,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2054 2,170,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2055 2,260,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2056 2,425,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2057 2,525,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2058 2,700,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2059 2,810,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2060 3,000,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2061 3,120,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2062 3,330,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2063 3,460,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2064 3,685,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
12/01/2065 9,865,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000
88,545,000
Dated Date 12/01/2035
Delivery Date 12/01/2035
First Coupon 06/01/2036
Par Amount 88,545,000.00
Original Issue Discount
Production 88,545,000.00 100.000000%
Underwriter's Discount (442,725.00) (0.500000%)
Purchase Price 88,102,275.00 99.500000%
Accrued Interest
Net Proceeds 88,102,275.00
17
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-35RSP,35RSP)
NET DEBT SERVICE
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING & IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Period Total Debt Service Net
Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Reserve Fund Debt Service
12/01/2036 1,765,000 4.000% 3,541,800 5,306,800 5,306,800
12/01/2037 1,835,000 4.000% 3,471,200 5,306,200 5,306,200
12/01/2038 2,015,000 4.000% 3,397,800 5,412,800 5,412,800
12/01/2039 2,090,000 4.000% 3,317,200 5,407,200 5,407,200
12/01/2040 2,280,000 4.000% 3,233,600 5,513,600 5,513,600
12/01/2041 2,370,000 4.000% 3,142,400 5,512,400 5,512,400
12/01/2042 2,570,000 4.000% 3,047,600 5,617,600 5,617,600
12/01/2043 2,670,000 4.000% 2,944,800 5,614,800 5,614,800
12/01/2044 2,890,000 4.000% 2,838,000 5,728,000 5,728,000
12/01/2045 3,000,000 4.000% 2,722,400 5,722,400 5,722,400
12/01/2046 3,235,000 4.000% 2,602,400 5,837,400 5,837,400
12/01/2047 3,360,000 4.000% 2,473,000 5,833,000 5,833,000
12/01/2048 3,605,000 4.000% 2,338,600 5,943,600 5,943,600
12/01/2049 3,745,000 4.000% 2,194,400 5,939,400 5,939,400
12/01/2050 4,015,000 4.000% 2,044,600 6,059,600 6,059,600
12/01/2051 1,795,000 4.000% 1,884,000 3,679,000 3,679,000
12/01/2052 1,940,000 4.000% 1,812,200 3,752,200 3,752,200
12/01/2053 2,015,000 4.000% 1,734,600 3,749,600 3,749,600
12/01/2054 2,170,000 4.000% 1,654,000 3,824,000 3,824,000
12/01/2055 2,260,000 4.000% 1,567,200 3,827,200 3,827,200
12/01/2056 2,425,000 4.000% 1,476,800 3,901,800 3,901,800
12/01/2057 2,525,000 4.000% 1,379,800 3,904,800 3,904,800
12/01/2058 2,700,000 4.000% 1,278,800 3,978,800 3,978,800
12/01/2059 2,810,000 4.000% 1,170,800 3,980,800 3,980,800
12/01/2060 3,000,000 4.000% 1,058,400 4,058,400 4,058,400
12/01/2061 3,120,000 4.000%938,400 4,058,400 4,058,400
12/01/2062 3,330,000 4.000%813,600 4,143,600 4,143,600
12/01/2063 3,460,000 4.000%680,400 4,140,400 4,140,400
12/01/2064 3,685,000 4.000%542,000 4,227,000 4,227,000
12/01/2065 9,865,000 4.000% 394,600 10,259,600 6,033,000 4,226,600
88,545,000 61,695,400 150,240,400 6,033,000 144,207,400
18
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-35RSP,35RSP)
BOND DEBT SERVICE
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING & IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Annual
Period Debt Debt
Ending Principal Coupon Interest Service Service
06/01/2036 1,770,900 1,770,900
12/01/2036 1,765,000 4.000% 1,770,900 3,535,900 5,306,800
06/01/2037 1,735,600 1,735,600
12/01/2037 1,835,000 4.000% 1,735,600 3,570,600 5,306,200
06/01/2038 1,698,900 1,698,900
12/01/2038 2,015,000 4.000% 1,698,900 3,713,900 5,412,800
06/01/2039 1,658,600 1,658,600
12/01/2039 2,090,000 4.000% 1,658,600 3,748,600 5,407,200
06/01/2040 1,616,800 1,616,800
12/01/2040 2,280,000 4.000% 1,616,800 3,896,800 5,513,600
06/01/2041 1,571,200 1,571,200
12/01/2041 2,370,000 4.000% 1,571,200 3,941,200 5,512,400
06/01/2042 1,523,800 1,523,800
12/01/2042 2,570,000 4.000% 1,523,800 4,093,800 5,617,600
06/01/2043 1,472,400 1,472,400
12/01/2043 2,670,000 4.000% 1,472,400 4,142,400 5,614,800
06/01/2044 1,419,000 1,419,000
12/01/2044 2,890,000 4.000% 1,419,000 4,309,000 5,728,000
06/01/2045 1,361,200 1,361,200
12/01/2045 3,000,000 4.000% 1,361,200 4,361,200 5,722,400
06/01/2046 1,301,200 1,301,200
12/01/2046 3,235,000 4.000% 1,301,200 4,536,200 5,837,400
06/01/2047 1,236,500 1,236,500
12/01/2047 3,360,000 4.000% 1,236,500 4,596,500 5,833,000
06/01/2048 1,169,300 1,169,300
12/01/2048 3,605,000 4.000% 1,169,300 4,774,300 5,943,600
06/01/2049 1,097,200 1,097,200
12/01/2049 3,745,000 4.000% 1,097,200 4,842,200 5,939,400
06/01/2050 1,022,300 1,022,300
12/01/2050 4,015,000 4.000% 1,022,300 5,037,300 6,059,600
06/01/2051 942,000 942,000
12/01/2051 1,795,000 4.000%942,000 2,737,000 3,679,000
06/01/2052 906,100 906,100
12/01/2052 1,940,000 4.000%906,100 2,846,100 3,752,200
06/01/2053 867,300 867,300
12/01/2053 2,015,000 4.000%867,300 2,882,300 3,749,600
06/01/2054 827,000 827,000
12/01/2054 2,170,000 4.000%827,000 2,997,000 3,824,000
06/01/2055 783,600 783,600
12/01/2055 2,260,000 4.000%783,600 3,043,600 3,827,200
06/01/2056 738,400 738,400
12/01/2056 2,425,000 4.000%738,400 3,163,400 3,901,800
06/01/2057 689,900 689,900
12/01/2057 2,525,000 4.000%689,900 3,214,900 3,904,800
06/01/2058 639,400 639,400
12/01/2058 2,700,000 4.000%639,400 3,339,400 3,978,800
06/01/2059 585,400 585,400
12/01/2059 2,810,000 4.000%585,400 3,395,400 3,980,800
06/01/2060 529,200 529,200
12/01/2060 3,000,000 4.000%529,200 3,529,200 4,058,400
06/01/2061 469,200 469,200
12/01/2061 3,120,000 4.000%469,200 3,589,200 4,058,400
06/01/2062 406,800 406,800
12/01/2062 3,330,000 4.000%406,800 3,736,800 4,143,600
06/01/2063 340,200 340,200
12/01/2063 3,460,000 4.000%340,200 3,800,200 4,140,400
06/01/2064 271,000 271,000
12/01/2064 3,685,000 4.000%271,000 3,956,000 4,227,000
06/01/2065 197,300 197,300
12/01/2065 9,865,000 4.000%197,300 10,062,300 10,259,600
88,545,000 61,695,400 150,240,400 150,240,400
19
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-35RSP,35RSP)
CALL PROVISIONS
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING & IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Call Table: CALL
Call Date Call Price
12/01/2045 100.00
20
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-35RSP,35RSP)
SUMMARY OF BONDS REFUNDED
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING & IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Maturity Interest Par Call Call
Bond Date Rate Amount Date Price
Series 2025 Service Plan, 25SP, TERM55:
12/01/2036 5.000% 2,010,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2037 5.000% 2,105,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2038 5.000% 2,315,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2039 5.000% 2,430,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2040 5.000% 2,660,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2041 5.000% 2,785,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2042 5.000% 3,035,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2043 5.000% 3,185,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2044 5.000% 3,455,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2045 5.000% 3,620,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2046 5.000% 3,915,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2047 5.000% 4,105,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2048 5.000% 4,430,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2049 5.000% 4,645,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2050 5.000% 4,995,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2051 5.000% 2,865,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2052 5.000% 3,080,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2053 5.000% 3,235,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2054 5.000% 3,470,000 12/01/2035 100.000
12/01/2055 5.000% 3,645,000 12/01/2035 100.000
65,985,000
21
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-35RSP,35RSP)
ESCROW REQUIREMENTS
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING & IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Dated Date 12/01/2035
Delivery Date 12/01/2035
Period Principal
Ending Redeemed Total
12/01/2035 65,985,000 65,985,000.00
65,985,000 65,985,000.00
22
Prepared by Piper Sandler Special District Group (Finance 8.901 Legacy MD Nos. 1-12:BSP-35RSP,35RSP)
BOND SOLUTION
LEGACY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-12
Jefferson County, Colorado
~~~
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING & IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2035
~~~
Service Plan
Period Proposed Proposed Debt Service Total Adj Revenue Unused Debt Service
Ending Principal Debt Service Adjustments Debt Service Constraints Revenues Coverage
12/01/2036 1,765,000 5,306,800 5,306,800 5,311,644 4,844 100.09%
12/01/2037 1,835,000 5,306,200 5,306,200 5,308,142 1,942 100.04%
12/01/2038 2,015,000 5,412,800 5,412,800 5,413,302 502 100.01%
12/01/2039 2,090,000 5,407,200 5,407,200 5,409,596 2,396 100.04%
12/01/2040 2,280,000 5,513,600 5,513,600 5,516,722 3,122 100.06%
12/01/2041 2,370,000 5,512,400 5,512,400 5,512,801 401 100.01%
12/01/2042 2,570,000 5,617,600 5,617,600 5,621,925 4,325 100.08%
12/01/2043 2,670,000 5,614,800 5,614,800 5,617,777 2,977 100.05%
12/01/2044 2,890,000 5,728,000 5,728,000 5,728,929 929 100.02%
12/01/2045 3,000,000 5,722,400 5,722,400 5,724,541 2,141 100.04%
12/01/2046 3,235,000 5,837,400 5,837,400 5,837,754 354 100.01%
12/01/2047 3,360,000 5,833,000 5,833,000 5,833,111 111 100.00%
12/01/2048 3,605,000 5,943,600 5,943,600 5,948,417 4,817 100.08%
12/01/2049 3,745,000 5,939,400 5,939,400 5,943,504 4,104 100.07%
12/01/2050 4,015,000 6,059,600 6,059,600 6,060,935 1,335 100.02%
12/01/2051 1,795,000 3,679,000 3,679,000 3,679,876 876 100.02%
12/01/2052 1,940,000 3,752,200 3,752,200 3,753,554 1,354 100.04%
12/01/2053 2,015,000 3,749,600 3,749,600 3,753,554 3,954 100.11%
12/01/2054 2,170,000 3,824,000 3,824,000 3,828,705 4,705 100.12%
12/01/2055 2,260,000 3,827,200 3,827,200 3,828,705 1,505 100.04%
12/01/2056 2,425,000 3,901,800 3,901,800 3,905,359 3,559 100.09%
12/01/2057 2,525,000 3,904,800 3,904,800 3,905,359 559 100.01%
12/01/2058 2,700,000 3,978,800 3,978,800 3,983,546 4,746 100.12%
12/01/2059 2,810,000 3,980,800 3,980,800 3,983,546 2,746 100.07%
12/01/2060 3,000,000 4,058,400 4,058,400 4,063,297 4,897 100.12%
12/01/2061 3,120,000 4,058,400 4,058,400 4,063,297 4,897 100.12%
12/01/2062 3,330,000 4,143,600 4,143,600 4,144,643 1,043 100.03%
12/01/2063 3,460,000 4,140,400 4,140,400 4,144,643 4,243 100.10%
12/01/2064 3,685,000 4,227,000 4,227,000 4,227,616 616 100.01%
12/01/2065 9,865,000 10,259,600 (6,033,000) 4,226,600 4,227,616 1,016 100.02%
88,545,000 150,240,400 (6,033,000) 144,207,400 144,282,417 75,017
23
ITEM NUMBER: 3 DATE: February 24, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL BILL 05-2025
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS
CONCERNING DISPOSITION OF LOST, ABANDONED, AND
UNCLAIMED PROPERTY
☒PUBLIC HEARING☐BIDS/MOTIONS☐RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☒ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
The Colorado state treasurer's office has advised the City of a state statute govering
unclaimed property. The statute referenced is the Colorado Revised Uniform Unclaimed Property Act, CRS 38-13-101 et seq. (the “Act’). The Act generally requires holders of
unclaimed property, such as the City, to disburse unclaimed cash and cash instruments
to the state treasurer. The City may exempt itself from the Act, but only if it has adopted
a local ordinance concerning unclaimed property which conflicts with the Act. This
ordinance revises Code sections to comply with the Act while perserving the City’s authority to dispose of unclaimed property. The ordinance simplifies the Code sections
on disposition of unclaimed property generally and property held by the police
department.
PRIOR ACTION:
City Council provided direction to the City Attorney at the December 2, 2024, study
session to draft an ordinance for consideration.
City Council approved this ordinance on first reading on February 10, 2024. A motion
was made by Councilmember Snell and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stites and was approved by a vote of 8 to 0.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Unclaimed property (including cash or cash equivalents), after a notice procedure, can be sold, retained or otherwise disposed of by the City. The amount of funds received by
Council Action Form – Lost, Abandoned, and Unclaimed Property
February 24, 2025 Page 2
the City from disposal of unclaimed property varies year to year, but is not significant.
BACKGROUND:
The Act codifies a common law rule that unclaimed property escheats (is forfeited to) the
state. The focus of the Act is unclaimed money, in all of its various forms, including cash,
checks, deposits, gameplay cards, currency, financial loyalty cards, gift cards, money
orders, mineral lease royalties, etc. The Act also includes the contents of an abandoned or unclaimed safe deposit box. Clearly, the state does not want unclaimed motor vehicles,
bicycles, furniture, or any other form of abandoned property. The state treasurer only
wants cash or cash equivalents.
The Act defines the ways in which property is determined to be abandoned or has gone
uncollected. The Act requires the “holder” (anyone, including the City, who has custody of property which has not been claimed) to make annual reports to the state treasurer on
November 1 of each year, and to pay over to the state unclaimed money, as defined. Even
if the holder has no property to declare, a report is still required.
At CRS 38-13-1504, the Act provides that the entire article does not apply to a local
government if:
• the local government has an ordinance or resolution “relating to the disposition of
property that conflicts with the Act”;
• the ordinance or resolution requires the local government to hold the (cash)
property for at least five years after it is presumed abandoned; and
• the local government provides the state treasurer with an annual report listing the owners for whom it is holding property and the value of that property.
Accordingly, so long as the City has a sufficient ordinance or code provision, it need not deliver unclaimed funds to the treasurer, as otherwise required of holders. In order to have
this “opt out" status, however, the City must revise its Code sections on disposition of
unclaimed property, and also make the short form report to the state treasurer by November 1 of each year.
The City's Code of Laws contains two sections relating to the disposition of unclaimed property. The police department routinely disposes of bicycles and property held in
evidence and not claimed under Title 19 article IV in the Code. The disposition procedure
under this article is unnecessarily lengthy, and can be streamlined.
Code Section 2-5 is the City’s general (non law enforcement) code section on unclaimed
property. It presently requires all unclaimed property (including cash or cash equivalents) to be held for two years, then after a notice procedure which includes publication in the
newspaper, it can be sold, retained or otherwise disposed of by the City. This ordinance
extends the hold periods for cash and cash equivalents to 5 years, as required by the Act, but reduces this period to 60 days for non cash property. The ordinance also streamlines
the notice and disposal procedure and makes conforming changes to Chapter 19 for property held by the police department.
Council Action Form – Lost, Abandoned, and Unclaimed Property
February 24, 2025 Page 3
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff and City Attorney recommend approval.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve Council Bill 05-2025, an ordinance amending the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws concerning disposition of lost, abandoned, and unclaimed
property, on second reading, order it published and that it takes effect fifteen
days after final publication as provided by the Charter.”
or,
“I move to postpone indefinitely Council Bill 05-2025, an ordinance amending the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws concerning disposition of lost, abandoned, and
unclaimed property, for the following reason(s) _________________.”
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Gerald Dahl, City Attorney Patrick Goff, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Council Bill 05-2025
2. Letter from State Treasurer
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SNELL
Council Bill No. 05
Ordinance No. 1818
Series 2025
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS
CONCERNING DISPOSITION OF LOST, ABANDONED, OR UNCLAIMED
PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge is a home rule municipality having all powers conferred by Article XX of the Colorado Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to its home rule authority and C.R.S. § 31-23-101, the City, acting through its City Council (the “Council”), is authorized to adopt ordinances for the
protection of the public health, safety or welfare; and
WHEREAS, in the exercise of this authority the Council has previously adopted provisions within the Code of Laws concerning lost or abandoned property; and
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to amend Section 2-5 of the Code on disposition of unclaimed property generally and Article IV of Chapter 19 of the Code concerning
unclaimed property held by the police department.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO:
Section 1. Section 2-5 of the Code of Laws is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Sec. 2-5. Disposition of unclaimed property.
(a) Purpose, PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW. The purpose of this section AND
OF ARTICLE IV OF CHAPTER 19 OF THE CODE is to provide for the
administration and disposition of unclaimed property which is in the possession of or under the control of the municipalityCITY. THE CITY
COUNCIL DECLARES ITS INTENT TO FULLY OCCUPY THE FIELD OF
UNCLAIMED PROPERTY DISPOSITION AND TO CONFLICT WITH AND
PREEMPT ARTICLE 13 OF TITLE 38 OF THE COLORADO REVISED
STATUTES TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY CRS 38-13-1504.
(b) Definitions. Unless otherwise required by context or use, words and terms
shall be defined as follows:
(1) .Unclaimed property means INTANGIBLE PROPERTY AND TANGIBLE
PROPERTY AS DEFINED HEREIN. Any tangible or intangible property,
ATTACHMENT 1
including any income or increment derived therefrom, less any lawful
charges, that is held by or under the control of the CITYmunicipality
and which has not been claimed by its owner AS PROVIDED HEREIN. for a period of more than two (2) years after it became payable or
distributable. For purposes of this section, "unclaimed property" shall
not mean lost, abandoned, stolen or confiscated personal property
as provided in article IV, chapter 19 of this Code. The disposition of
lost, abandoned, stolen or confiscated personal property shall be governed by the provisions contained in article IV, chapter 19,
notwithstanding the provisions of this section.
(2) INTANGIBLE PROPERTY MEANS CASH AND FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AS DEFINED AT CRS 38-13-102 AND CRS 38-13-205,
AND THE CONTENTS OF SAFE DEPOSIT BOXES.
(3) Municipality means the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
(4) Owner means a person or entity, including a corporation, partnership,
association, governmental entity other than the municipality, or a
duly authorized legal representative or successor in interest of same,
which owns unclaimed property held by the municipalityCITY.
(5) TANGIBLE PROPERTY MEANS ALL PROPERTY OTHER THAN
INTANGIBLE PROPERTY.
(c) Procedure for disposition of property DISPOSITION PROCEDURE.
(1) INTANGIBLE PROPERTY MAY BE RETAINED OR DISPOSED OF FIVE
(5) YEARS AFTER IT HAS BEEN HELD BY THE CITY AS UNCLAIMED. TANGIBLE PROPERTY MAY BE DISPOSED OF _______ DAYS AFTER
IT HAS BEEN HELD BY THE CITY AS UNCLAIMED.
(2) Prior to disposition of any unclaimed property, the city clerk shall
cause a notice to be SENTpublished in a newspaper of general
circulation in the municipality. In addition, the city clerk shall send
a written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the
last known address, if any, of any owner of THE unclaimed property. The last known address of the owner shall be the last address of
the owner as shown by the records of the municipal department or
agency holding the property. Each such notice shall include a
description of the property, the amount or estimated value of the
property and when available, the purpose for which the property was deposited or otherwise held. Each suchTHE notice shall state
where the owner may make inquiry of or claim the property. Each
such notice AND shall also state that if the owner fails to provide
the city clerk with a written claim for the return of the property
within sixty (60) days of the date of the notice, the property shall
become the sole property of the CITYmunicipality and any claim of
the owner to such property shall be deemed forfeited.
(3) If the city clerk receives no written claim within the above sixty-day claim period, the property shall become the sole property of the
CITYmunicipality and any claim of the owner to such property shall be deemed forfeited.
(4) If the city clerk receives a written claim within the sixty-day claim
period, the city manager shall evaluate the claim and DETERMINE WHETHER THE CLAIM IS give written notice to the city clerk and
the claimant within ninety (90) days thereof that the claim has been
accepted or denied in whole or in part. The city manager may
request further supporting documentation from the claimant prior
to disbursing or refusing to disburse the property.
In the event that there is more than one claimant for the same
property, the city manager may, at the city manager's option,
resolve such claims or may resolve such claims by depositing the
disputed property with the registry of the District Court in an
interpleader action.
(5) In the event that all THE claims filed are IS denied, the property shall
become the sole property of the CITYmunicipality and any claim of
the owner of such property shall be deemed forfeited.
(6) Any legal action filed challenging a decision of the city manager
shall be filed pursuant to Rule 106 of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure within thirty (30) days of such decision or shall be
forever barred. If any legal action is timely filed, the property shall
be disbursed by the city manager pursuant to the order of the court
having jurisdiction over such claim.
(7) The City Manager is authorized to establish and administer
procedures for the administration and disposition of unclaimed
property consistent with this section. including compliance requirements for other municipal officers and employees in the
identification and disposition of such property.
(8) THE CITY MANAGER SHALL CAUSE AN ANNUAL REPORT TO THE
STATE TREASURER OF INTANGIBLE PROPERTY BEING HELD BY
THE CITY, PURSUANT TO CRS 38-13-1504.
Section 2. Code section 19-80 is repealed and reenacted in its entirety to read as
follows:
Sec. 19-80. - Disposition if OF unclaimed PROPERTY.
If property held in custody BY THE CHIEF OF POLICE remains unclaimed
sixty (60) days after such property is no longer required to be held in
evidence pursuant to section 19-77, or sixty (60) days after such property
has come into the possession of the chief of police or thirty (30) days after
the mailing of any letter of notice provided for in section 19-79, such property may be retained by the police department and kept for use by the
city for training programs or otherwise, or disposed of from time to time by
the chief of police or his designee IN THE MANNER PROVIDED BY CODE
SECTION 1-5, WHEREBY THE CHIEF OF POLICE SHALL HAVE THE POWERS
AND DUTIES OF THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK WITH RESPECT TO NOTICE TO OWNERS AND DISPOSAL AS DESCRIBED THEREINas follows:
Section 3. The following sections of Article IV of Chapter 19 of the Code of Laws
are repealed: 19-81, 19-83, 19-84, 19-85, 19-86, 19-87, 19-88, 19-89, 19-90, and 19-92.
Section 4. Present Code sections 19-82 and 19-91 are renumbered as 19-81 and 19-82, respectively. As renumbered, Code section 19-82 is amended to read in its entirety:
Sec 19-82 Rights of Finder.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, whenever any item of lost or
abandoned property has been found and delivered to the chief of police or to one
(1) of his subordinates for care, custody and control, such item shall be returned to the original finder whenever claim has been made by the finder and the following
conditions have been met:
(1) The claimant is the person who originally found the lost or abandoned
property.
(2) The claimant, after surrendering the property to the chief of police, has served written notice of his intention to make a claim on that item within
sixty (60) days of the surrender of the item.
(3) The lost or abandoned property has remained unclaimed by the owner or
person having a right to the property for sixty (60) days after surrender of
the property to the chief of police.
(4) The lost or abandoned property is not stolen or confiscated property, nor
property held under the exceptions outlined in sections 19-86 to 19-89, nor property held as evidence pursuant to section 19-77.
Section 5. Severability, Conflicting ordinances repealed. If any section, subsection
or clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid,
the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected
thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days
after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter.
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on the
10th day of February 2025, order it published by title in a newspaper of general
circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and in full on the City’s website, and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for February 24, 2025 at 6:30 p.m., in the
Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a
vote of ___ to ___, this 24th day of February 2025.
SIGNED by the Mayor on this _____ day of ____________, 2025.
Bud Starker, Mayor
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Senior Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to Form
Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney
First Publication: February 11, 2025
Second Publication: February 25, 2025 Effective Date: March 13, 2025
Published:
Jeffco Transcript and www.ci.wheatridge.co.us
ITEM NUMBER: 4
DATE: February 24, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION
TITLE: MOTION TO APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS,
COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
☐PUBLIC HEARING☒BIDS/MOTIONS☐RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
As of March 2, 2025, the terms of twenty-one Board, Commission, and Committee
members of the City of Wheat Ridge will expire. Additionally, there are six existing vacancies to fill which include seats on the Board of Adjustment, Parks and Recreation
Commission, Community Partners Grant Program, and the IDEA Committee. These
twenty-seven positions in total are to be filled or reappointed.
PRIOR ACTION:
Members of the City Council appoint members to Boards, Commissions, and
Committees annually and as needed throughout the year when vacancies are filled. Per
Ordinance number 1777 the Mayor will appoint all Alternate and At-Large positions
annually and as needed throughout the year when vacancies are filled as well.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
BACKGROUND:
Each year, the city advertises for residents who might be interested in volunteering on one of the Boards, Commissions, or Committees. This year, positions were advertised
through a multi-week promotional campaign including the City’s website, social media,
email, and newsletters, as well as to the graduates of Wheat Ridge 101 and 102.
Simultaneously, letters were emailed to current Board, Commission, and Committee
members whose terms expire on March 2, 2025, asking if they were interested in seeking reappointment.
Council Action Form – Board, Commission, and Committee Annual Appointments
February 24, 2025
Page 2
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Please see ATTACHMENT 1 for all recommended motions.
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Rhiannon Curry, Executive Assistant
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
Allison Scheck, Deputy City Manager Patrick Goff, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Motion Sheet for Council and Mayor Appointments
2. 2025 Board, Committee, and Commissions Application Packet
2025 Boards, Commissions, &
Committees Annual Appointments
Mayor
“I move to appoint John Troisi to the Alternate Board of Adjustment, term to expire
March 2, 2028” and
“I move to appoint Betty Jo Page to the Alternate Board of Adjustment vacancy, term to
expire March 2, 2027” and
“I move to appoint Amanda Burch to the At-Large Sustainable Wheat Ridge, term to
expire March 2, 2028” and
“I move to appoint Lynn Carter to the At-Large IDEA, term to expire March 2, 2028” and
“I move to appoint Joseph Chisholm to the At-Large IDEA, term to expire March 2, 2028”
and
“I move to appoint Edward Nepomuceno to the At-Large IDEA vacancy, term to expire
March 2, 2027” and
“I move to appoint Terra Greer to the At-Large IDEA vacancy, term to expire March 2,
2026”
District I
“I move to appoint Tom Zelenko to the District I, Board of Adjustment, term to expire
March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Ryan Hester to the District I, Parks and Recreation Commission, term
to expire on March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Ralph Habben to the District I, Parks and Recreation Commission
vacancy, term to expire on March 2, 2027” and,
“I move to appoint Cody Hedges to the District I, Planning Commission, term to expire
on March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Corinne Anderson to the District I, Sustainable Wheat Ridge, term to
expire on March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Kelly Trace to the District I, Community Partners Grant Program, term
to expire on March 2, 2028”.
District II
“I move to appoint Alastair Huber to the District II, Board of Adjustment, term to expire
March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Jason McCullough to the District II, Building Code Advisory Board,
term to expire March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Daniel Graeve to the District II, Planning Commission, term to expire
on March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Julianne Stern to the District II, Renewal Wheat Ridge, term to expire
March 2, 2030”, and,
“I move to appoint Alix Finnegan to the District II, Sustainable Wheat Ridge, term to
expire March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Alex Gouldsmith to the District II, Community Partners Grant
Program, term to expire March 2, 2028.
District III
“I move to appoint Susan Wood to the District III, Planning Commission, term to expire
March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Allison Vitello to the District III, Community Partners Grant Program,
term to expire March 2, 2027” and,
“I move to appoint Amanda Fixsen to the District III, Community Partners Grant Program,
term to expire March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Cindy Chang to the District III, IDEA Committee, term to expire March
2, 2027”.
DISTRICT IV
“I move to appoint John Derosier to the District IV, Sustainable Wheat Ridge, term to
expire March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Charles Hood to the District IV, Community Partners Grant Program,
term to expire March 2, 2028” and,
“I move to appoint Raven Newberry to the District IV, Community Partners Grant
Program vacancy, term to expire March 2, 2027”.
2025 Boards and Commissions Appointment Applicant Summary
Alternate/At-Large Positions Appointed by the Mayor - need 3 ALT BOA members, 1 AL SWR member, and 4 AL IDEA members
Board Term End Date Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
BOA - ALT 3/2/2028 Troisi John III
BOA - ALT 3/2/2027 Page Betty Jo II vacancy
SWR - AL 3/2/2028 Burch Amanda II
IDEA - AL 3/2/2028 Carter Lynn II
IDEA - AL 3/2/2028 Chisholm Joseph I
IDEA - AL 3/2/2027 Nepomuceno Edward II vacancy
IDEA - AL 3/2/2026 Greer Terra IV vacancy
Carter Lynn II IDEA braznhsy@yahoo.com
Chisholm Joseph I IDEA jschis78@yahoo.com
Greer Terra IV IDEA dabneyta@grinnell.edu
Nepomuceno Edward II IDEA ed.nepomuceno@gmail.com
Board of Adjustment - Please select one member from District I and one member from Dist II
Term End Date Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
3/2/2028 Zelenko Tom I Jenny/Janeece
3/2/2028 Huber Alastair II Rachel/Scott
Hood Charles IV SWR BOA CPGP jcharleshood@gmail.com
Huber Alastair I reappointment huber1000@hotmail.com
Page Betty Jo II reappointment bettyjpage1@comcast.net
Troisi John III PC RWR BOA troisi859@gmail.com
Zelenko Tom I PC P&R BOA tzelenko@studiozarchitects.com
Building Code Advisory Board - Please select one member from District II
Term End Date Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
3/2/2028 McCullough Jason II Rachel/Scott
Derosier John IV SWR, BCAB, RWR John.t.derosier@gmail.com
McCullough Jason II BCAB CC P&R BCAB = 1st choice jasondmccullough@gmail.com
Thurnauer Logan II PC RWR BCAB lthurnauer@gmail.com
Parks and Recreation Commission - Please select two members from Dist I
Term End Date Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
3/2/2028 Hester Ryan I Jenny/Janeece
3/2/2027 Habben Ralph I Jenny/Janeece
Chang Cindy I P&R, SWR, IDEA P&R = 1st choice cindy.chang@gmail.com
Diehl Alyssa IV applied for RWR & P&R alliediehl31@gmail.com
Habben Ralph I reappointment sralphhabben@hotmail.com
Hester Ryan I mr.ryanhester@gmail.com
Kane-Hester Amelia II P&R PC P&R = 1st choice kane.mia@gmail.com
Kohlmeyer Katie II osborne.katie@gmail.com
McConnell Megan I RWR EC P&R megan.mcconnell927@gmail.com
McCullough Jason II BCAB CC P&R jasondmccullough@gmail.com
Springer Joseph II CC P&R PC RWR joeyspring@gmail.com
Trujillo Amy IV trujillolouie809@gmail.com
Winkler Adam I P&R RWR PC P&R = 1st choice adamw5000@hotmail.com
Zafian Brianna II P&R CC PC P&R = 1st choice zafianbrianna@gmail.com
Zelenko Tom I PC P&R BOA tzelenko@studiozarchitects.com
Planning Commission - Please select one member from District I, one member from Dist II, and one member from District III
Term End Date Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
3/2/2028 Hedges Cody I Per Jenny Snell & Janeece Hoppe
3/2/2028 Graeve Daniel II Rachel/Scott
3/2/2028 Wood Susan III Korey/Amanda
Amshoff Rachel III PC & RWR PC = 1st choice rachel.amshoff@gmail.com
Buehler Kelly III kelly@buehlr.com
Casey Adam IV adam-casey@live.com
Finnegan Alix II SWR RWR PC afinnegan23@gmail.com
Graeve Daniel II reappointment dangraeve@gmail.com
Hedges Cody I hedgescody@gmail.com
Kane-Hester Amelia II P&R PC kane.mia@gmail.com
Orsatti Bob III boborsatti@gmail.com
Phalen Patrick II PC & RWR PC = 1st choice pat.phalen@gmail.com
Robb Kelsey II RWR PC kelsey.robb@gmail.com
Schelke Jonathan I reappointment jonathanschelke31@gmail.com
Shramek John III shramekonline@gmail.com
Springer Joseph II CC P&R PC RWR joeyspring@gmail.com
Thurnauer Logan II PC RWR BCAB PC = 1st Choice lthurnauer@gmail.com
Troisi John III PC RWR BOA PC = 1st Choice troisi859@gmail.com
Winkler Adam I P&R RWR PC adamw5000@hotmail.com
Wood Susan III sawood17@comcast.net
Zafian Brianna II P&R CC PC zafianbrianna@gmail.com
Zelenko Tom I PC P&R BOA tzelenko@studiozarchitects.com
Renewal Wheat Ridge - Please select one member from Dist II
Term End Date Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
3/2/2030 Stern Julianne II Rachel/Scott
Amshoff Rachel III PC & RWR rachel.amshoff@gmail.com
Campigotto Stephanie II SWR, BCAB, RWR steph.campigotto@gmail.com
Derosier John IV RWR & P&R RWR=1st choice John.t.derosier@gmail.com
Diehl Alyssa IV SWR RWR PC alliediehl31@gmail.com
Finnegan Alix II RWR EC P&R RWR = 1st choice afinnegan23@gmail.com
McConnell Megan I PC & RWR megan.mcconnell927@gmail.com
Phalen Patrick II RWR PC RWR = 1st choice pat.phalen@gmail.com
Robb Kelsey II kelsey.robb@gmail.com
Springer Joseph II CC P&R PC RWR joeyspring@gmail.com
Stern Julianne II reappointment julianne.stern@gmail.com
Thurnauer Logan II PC RWR BCAB PC = 1st Choice lthurnauer@gmail.com
Troisi John III PC RWR BOA troisi859@gmail.com
Winkler Adam I P&R RWR PC adamw5000@hotmail.com
Sustainable Wheat Ridge - Please select one member from Dist I, one member from Dist II, and one member from Dist IV
Term End Date Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
3/2/2028 Anderson Corinne I Jenny/Janeece
3/2/2028 Finnegan Alix II Rachel/Scott
3/2/2028 Derosier John IV Dan/Leah
Anderson Corinne I SWR & CC SWR = 1st choice fromthedeskofcorinne@gmail.com
Burch Amanda II reappointment ms.amandaburch@gmail.com
Chang Cindy I P&R, SWR, IDEA cindy.chang@gmail.com
Derosier John IV SWR BCAB RWR SWR = 1st choice John.t.derosier@gmail.com
Finnegan Alix II SWR RWR PC SWR =1st Choice afinnegan23@gmail.com
Hood Charlie IV SWR BOA CPGP SWR = 1st Choice jcharleshood@gmail.com
Community Partners Grant Program - Please select 1 Dist I, 1 Dist II, 2 Dist III, and 2 Dist IV members
Term End Date Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
3/2/2028 Trace Kelly I Jenny/Janeece
3/2/2028 Gouldsmith Alex II Rachel/Scott
3/2/2028 Vitello Allison III Korey/Amanda
3/2/2028 Fixsen Amanda III Korey/Amanda
3/2/2028 Hood Charles IV Dan/Leah
3/2/2027 Newberry Raven IV Dan/Leah
Fixsen Amanda III reappointment amanda.fixsen@gmail.com
Gouldsmith Alex II SWR BOA CPGP agouldsmith7@gmail.com
Hood Charlie IV jcharleshood@gmail.com
Newberry Raven IV rnewb3@gmail.com
Schreiner Renee Out of City reneeschreiner96@gmail.com
Trace Kelly I kelly.trace@gmail.com
Vaselaar Kirsten III kirstenvaselaar@yahoo.com
Vitello Allison III alli.delgizzi@protonmail.com
Atland Sheri II Sherimillsaaltland@gmail.com
IDEA Committee - Please select 1 District III member
Term End Date Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
Carter Lynn II IDEA braznhsy@yahoo.com
Chang Cindy I P&R, IDEA, SWR cindy.chang@gmail.com
Chisholm Joseph I IDEA jschis78@yahoo.com
Greer Terra IV IDEA dabneyta@grinnell.edu
Medina Antonio IV IDEA antsmedina@gmail.com
Nepomuceno Edward II IDEA ed.nepomuceno@gmail.com
ITEM NUMBER:5
DATE: February 24, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION
TITLE: MOTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH CHARLES ABBOTT
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES AND
AUTHORIZING SUBSEQUENT PAYMENTS
☐PUBLIC HEARING☒BIDS/MOTIONS☐RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. has provided Building Division services for the City of
Wheat Ridge since 2018 under a contract that ends in March 2025. A competitive procurement process for Building Division services occurred in late 2024 resulting in
this award.
PRIOR ACTION:
In April 2017, the city awarded Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. (CAA) a contract for on-call inspection services. Later that year, the city began to consider the merits of
awarding a full-service contract to CAA to perform all functions of the Building Division.
City Council discussed the approach in a study session in January 2018, and in
February 2018, Council approved a contract with CAA for comprehensive Building
Division services.
The initial contract term was three (3) years with two (2) year extensions by mutual
agreement of the parties. City Council approved extensions in February 2021 and
February 2023.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The approved 2025 budget includes $868,000 for Building Division contractual services.
The fee structure for the contract is based on the city’s permit revenues with a
percentage of permit, plan review, and license fees paid to CAA. This approach is
described in more detail below.
Council Action Form – Building Services Contract
February 24, 2025
Page 2
BACKGROUND:
Historical Approach
For several decades, the city has used on-call inspection services to augment Building
Division functions. A partnership with DRCOG from the 1980s through 2001 provided
elevator and electrical inspections. From 2004 through 2017, the city contracted with a
third-party firm for on-call inspections. This on-call arrangement helped with continuity
of inspections during staff absences and vacations. The contracted firm also provided technical expertise in areas such as commercial electrical inspections, elevator
inspections, and plan review for complex permits.
The City’s relationship with CAA originally began in this on-call capacity. The Building
Division contract for on-call services was periodically put out to public bid, and in April
2017 the city changed vendors and awarded on-call services to CAA.
Very shortly thereafter, on May 8, 2017, Wheat Ridge suffered one of Colorado’s most
destructive hailstorms. As a result of the storm, the vast majority of the city’s homes
and structures were damaged, and the demand for roofing permits and inspections
skyrocketed. In their on-call capacity, CAA was able to bring inspectors and permit
technicians to Wheat Ridge from across the country to meet the customer service needs associated with storm-related permits. The city maintained the ability to provide
next day inspections, and continuity of service during this period was made possible by
the presence of CAA staff.
Later in 2017, and after difficulty keeping the division fully staffed, the city began to
consider the merits of awarding a full-service contract to CAA to perform all functions of the city’s Building Division. Vacancies among the inspector positions were difficult to
fill, and the pool of qualified candidates was limited. The pool of CBO candidates was
even more limited, and the CBO position was vacant for several extended periods from
2014 to 2018.
Staff discussed this issue with City Council in a study session on January 22, 2018. At the time, several other communities were also using on-call or full-service firms to
support Building Division functions. Based on the study session discussion and
consensus, City Council approved a conversion of the CAA contract to a full-service
arrangement on February 12, 2018. The City’s three Building Division employees were
offered CAA employment, and since 2018 the city has used a full-service contract model.
CAA is fully integrated into the Community Development Department and the city staff
team. CAA staff are based at City Hall with the rest of the department; they have City
email addresses, phone numbers, uniforms, and car decals. Most CAA staff are fully
dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge. This means the chief building official, permit technicians, and senior inspector have a consistent daily presence in the office and in
Council Action Form – Building Services Contract
February 24, 2025
Page 3
the community. CAA staff attend interdepartmental meetings, and many customers
probably have no realization that they are contracted employees.
New Contract
This integrated approach distinguishes CAA’s model from other companies who offer
similar services with less in-person presence. In late 2024, the city conducted a
competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process for Building Division services, which
received three responses. A selection committee evaluated the proposals and selected
CAA as the highest value provider with services most aligned to the city’s needs.
The fee structure in the contract is based on Building Division revenues, a portion of
which are paid to CAA. Those revenues include building permit fees, plan review fees,
and contractor license fees but not use tax. The fee structure is tiered, which means as
Building Division revenues go up, the percentage of revenues that are paid to CAA goes
down. For each monthly billing cycle, the fee structure is as follows:
• First $100,000 – 80% of monthly fees collected paid to CAA
• Over $100,000 – 60% of monthly fees collected paid to CAA
This is a more simplified approach than the prior contract which included three (3) tiers
and several itemized fees. An hourly rate sheet is provided if additional services beyond the base scope are ever requested; for example, these rates are utilized for the
hotel/motel inspection program which is unrelated to building permit revenue. The
contract term with CAA is up to nine (9) years with autorenewal each year. The purpose of this duration is to allow continuity of services.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the CAA contract.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve a contract with Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. for Building Division services and authorize subsequent payments.”
Or,
“I move to not approve a contract with Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. for Building Division services for the following reason(s).”
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Lauren Mikulak, Community Development Director Whitney Mugford-Smith, Procurement Manager
Patrick Goff, City Manager
Council Action Form – Building Services Contract
February 24, 2025
Page 4
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Statement of Work 2. Procurement BidTab from RFP
EXHIBIT A - STATEMENT OF WORK
Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. (CAA) will provide Full Service Building Division Services to the City of Wheat Ridge (City), including plan review and building inspection services as well as Building Official services. CAA offers to provide the requested services to the City as dictated by workload, including building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and residential code inspections and plan check, support staffing at the public counter during regular business hours, complex
code interpretation, policy and procedure recommendations, complaint investigations, and all other related activities. CAA will provide guaranteed turnaround times and on-call emergency staff as needed.
CAA is committed to fulfilling these services in a comprehensive and thorough manner with staff that is service oriented, courteous, and reliable. CAA will provide ICC certified staff to serve as
the City’s Building Official, Permit Technician(s) as well as ICC Certified Building Inspector(s), Plans Examiner(s), and Registered Professionals as dictated by workload. CAA’s Building Inspector(s) will be available to conduct all inspection requests no later than the next business day. CAA staff will process and route construction drawings for plan check, calculate permit fees, issue and close out permits, conduct minor plan checks over the counter, and perform related tasks as needed. CAA will provide building code related code enforcement and be available to consult with office staff on building department or permit issues and questions as they arise.
Scope of Work
CAA will be responsible for the following Services consistent with the solicitation and proposal
for RFP-24-160:
1)Plan Reviewa)Evaluates completeness of applicationsb)Performs comprehensive plan review for all types of building permits within establishedtime framesc)Performs same-day plan review for limited permit types on limited days/timesd)Provides clear, written comments and correctionse)Provides comment resolution meetings and provides availability to discuss potential
permit submittalsf)Manages the submittal and resubmittal processg)Coordinates all reviewing divisions and agencies, such as weekly tracking and reporting
of outstanding plan review approvals
2)Permit Issuance & Administration
a)Coordinates all requirements preceding permit issuanceb)Accepts appropriate payment for permit-related feesc)Manages all permit-related records including monitoring plan review queue, managing
expiring permits, closes permits as appropriate, issues Certificates of Occupancy
3) Licensinga)Manages all contractor licensing, registrations, and renewalsb)Accepts appropriate payment for license-related feesc)Manages all license-related records
ATTACHMENT 1
4) Inspections a) Performs all building-code related inspections, including but not limited to concrete,
framing, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, drywall, roofing, elevator b) Performs business license inspections c) Performs courtesy inspections as required or requested such as in coordination with
economic development, planning, or code enforcement d) Performs annual hotel/motel inspections e) Adheres to the City’s service standards and to best practice: f) Performs next-day inspections for all inspection requests g) Accommodates same-day or after-hours inspections as necessary h) Provides clear, written correction notices for observed violations 5) General Administration, Reporting & Record Keeping a) Maintains written procedures and updates periodically for best practice and efficiency b) Maintains Building Division website content in accordance with City standards and accessibility requirements
c) Administers permit and licensing software (OpenGov) including maintenance of users, settings, record types, inspection types, reports, metrics, and documents d) Enforces plan review and permit deadlines and extensions
e) Completes periodic reporting, including weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual reports for various internal and external stakeholders (including but not limited to budget, volume, permit status, urban renewal, public art, County Assessor, and state agencies)
f) Complies with Colorado Open Records Act (CORA) and public information requests within established time frames g) Complies with records retention requirements as determined by the City Clerk’s office and the department’s records management plan h) Responds to email and phone messages within established time frames 6) Coordination a) Establishes and fosters productive working relationships with special districts (fire, water, sanitation) and coordinates as necessary including monthly fire meeting, quarterly agency meeting, and ad hoc coordination b) Participates in City staff meetings including but not limited to weekly development review
meetings, quarterly department meetings, pre-application meetings, and post-entitlement/pre-construction meetings c) Establishes a routine/weekly check-in between the CBO and Community Development
Director d) Coordinates with code enforcement staff including for the hotel/motel inspection program, code violations, life safety concerns, periodic meetings or inspections, and
court testimony as needed e) Coordinates with economic development staff to provide education, courtesy inspections, and guidance for new or existing businesses 7) Additional Services a) Recommends, approves, and implements building code and policy updates as needed consistent with best practice, state law, and policy direction from City leadership b) Serves as liaison to the City’s Building Code Advisory Board as needed c) Attends City Council meetings as needed d) Actively scans for work being performed without permits and issue Stop Work Orders as necessary and take other appropriate action consistent with City policies to enforce
adopted building codes
e) Any tasks related to plan review, permits, payment, inspection, or related work at the direction of the Community Development Director
8) Qualifications & Expectations a) Ensures adequate and qualified personnel in all roles (building official, inspectors,
reviewers, and permit technicians) b) Provides consistent staffing for key personnel to minimize turnover c) Augments staffing as needed such as for specialized plan review, specialized inspections, or periods of higher permit/inspection volume and as negotiated to meet plan review and inspection customer service levels d) Represents the City in a positive and professional manner at all times and in all manners (presentation, communication, demeanor, dress, et cetera) e) Ensures valid Colorado Driver’s License and provides annual verification to City f) Maintains and upgrades appropriate credentials and ICC certifications via continuing education or other appropriate, industry-approved association or seminar; provide annual verification of such credentials
g) Complies with City dress code h) Provides vehicles, cell phones, tablets, drones, ladders and other necessary equipment for field work
Plan Review Times
The following are maximum plan review times:
Review Type Review Time
Single Family Dwellings 10 business days
Re-Review 5 business days
Minor Alterations of Single Family Dwellings 5 business days
Tenant Improvements 10 business days
Additions 10 business days
New Commercial/Industrial 10 business days
Revisions to Approved Plans 1–5 business days
Operational Responsibilities
CAA will provide all materials, resources, tools and training required for our professionals to
perform their assigned duties, including:
• Vehicles
• Cell phones
• iPads and other technology devices that enhance our service.
The City of Wheat Ridge will provide the following resources so that CAA can seamlessly
function as an extension of City staff:
• City badges
• City business cards
• City/Outlook email access
• Permitting software access
• IT network access
• Computers, monitors and necessary software for up to nine (9) individuals
• Desk space for up to nine (9) individuals
• Administrative support as necessary
• Basic office supplies such as paper, pencils
• One office set of I-code books
• Additional supplies as approved and as needed to complete the assigned work
CAA staff may be entered into the City’s recognition platform (eg Give-a-Wow) but are ineligible
to redeem points.
Fee Schedule
Fees below are inclusive of all costs for comprehensive Building Division Services, including general and administrative, travel, per diem, training, materials, supplies, and other items necessary to complete the project. Fees listed include:
• As-Needed Company Liaison
• As-Needed Operational Support
• Certified Building Official
• Certified Building Inspectors
• Certified Plan Reviewer
• Permit Technicians
• ADU Inspections
• Business License Inspections
• Contractor Licenses
Monthly Fees Collected CAA’s % of Fees
First $100,000 of fees calculated and collected per month 80%
Over $100,000 of fees calculated and
collected per month 60%
CAA will respond to all emergency inspections after hours at no cost to the city.
Hotel / Motel Inspections will be requested on an “as-needed” basis in accordance with the rates
described in Exhibit B.
Services outside of the Scope of Work can be provided for the hourly rates listed in Exhibit B,
subject to change annually.
EXHIBIT B – RATE SCHEDULE
See attached.
RFP-24-160-Building Division Services 29
Services outside of the Scope of Work can be provided for the hourly rates listed below.
Rate Schedule FY 2024-2025
Building & Safety Services
Classification Hourly
Rates
Principal Building Official $179.00
Building Official $154.00
Senior Building Inspector* $130.00
Building Inspector/Plan Checker $120.00
Building Inspector* $110.00
Permit Specialist $82.00
Code Enforcement Officer $93.00
Engineering/Public Works Services
Classification Hourly
Rates
Principal Engineer $216.00
City Engineer $167.00
Project Manager $179.00
Senior Engineer $172.00
Project Engineer $162.00
Associate Engineer $135.00
Senior Design Engineer $142.00
Assistant Design Engineer $121.00
Senior Traffic Engineer/Manager $185.00
Transportation Planner $135.00
Traffic Engineer Associate $118.00
3-Person Survey Crew $333.00
2-Person Survey Crew $258.00
Senior Draftsperson (CADD) $118.00
Draftsperson (CADD) $105.00
Senior Public Works Inspector* $130.00
Public Works Inspector* $118.00
Senior Plan Check Engineer $154.00
Plan Check Engineer $130.00
Community Development Services
Classification Hourly
Rates
Community Development Director $179.00
Principal Planner $179.00
Senior Planner $157.00
Associate Planner $134.00
Assistance Planner $118.00
Planning Technician $100.00
Code Enforcement Officer $93.00
Environmental Services
Classification Hourly
Rates
Environmental Project Manager $175.00
Environmental Program Manager $135.00
Sr. Environmental Plan Checker $165.00
Environmental Plan Checker $125.00
Environmental Analyst $115.00
Environmental Associate $105.00
Environmental Inspector $100.00
Other Services
Classification Hourly
Rates
Landscape Architect Director $154.00
Associate Landscape Architect $118.00
Expert Witness Services $370.00
Senior Contract Administrator $136.00
Administrative Assistant $76.00
Clerical Support $65.00
The above hourly rates include general and administrative overhead and fees and employee payroll burden. Rates are subject
to an annual adjustment based upon increases adopted by Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. as reflected in the Consumer Price
Index (CPI).
*The preceding rates apply exclusively to non-prevailing wage projects. In California, where payment of local prevailing wages
on public works projects is mandated, the hourly rates for prevailing wage project inspection will be $190.00 for regular time;
$250.00 for overtime on Mondays through Saturdays; and $275.00 for overtime on Sundays and Holidays. Prevailing Wage
rates are subject to increases pursuant to the State of California’s Department of Industrial Wage Rate Determinations.
RFP-24-160-Building Division Services
Vendor Compliance Eval 1 Eval 2 Eval 3 Eval 4 Eval Sum Eval Avg Rank Notes
Charless Abbott Yes 1
Cover Letter 10 10 10 8
Approach 15 20 20 16
Firm & Staffing 25 25 25 18
Experience & References 20 20 20 15
Fee Proposal 15 12 15 12
PW Add-Alt 10 10 10 8
Total 95 97 100 77 369 92.25
SAFEbuilt Yes 2
Cover Letter 5 8 10 8
Approach 20 15 20 12
Firm & Staffing 25 20 20 20
Experience & References 20 20 10 16
Fee Proposal 15 10 10 12
PW Add-Alt 10 8 10 6
Total 95 81 90 74 340 85
Shums Coda Yes 3
Cover Letter 7 6 9 8
Approach 7 15 20 14
Firm & Staffing 10 18 25 18
Experience & References 10 20 20 15
Fee Proposal 5 9 10 10
PW Add-Alt 2 6 5 0
Total 41 74 89 65 269 67.25
Strong response. Incumbent team - CAA is
aligned with our culture, already keyed in with
our systems transformation project. Hit the
mark - strong understanding of our culture.
Alternate proposal aligns well. May be more
expensive than one other. Pricing is percentage
based.
Templated response. Onboarding would a huge
lift. Strong company portfolio. Lowest price but
many hourly charges - concern about scope
creep / change orders. Alternate proposal looks
overly expensive - unsure they undertood the
full scope. Discussion of their software over in-
house systems. More of a supplement / staff
aug compared to full service. Minimal in-person
presence. Unclear level of support provided.
Weaker proposal in comparison, does not
appear they are aligned with our business
model. Not a good fit. Unclear submission
regarding which team we might work with.
Missed on the add-alt. Bench not deep enough.
More of a supplement / staff aug compared to
full service. Minimal in-person precense.
Invoices for mileage?
ATTACHMENT 2