The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-18-26 City Council Special Meeting Agenda PacketAGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO Monday, May 18, 2026 6:30 p.m. This meeting will be conducted as a virtual meeting, and in person, at: 7500 West 29th Avenue, Municipal Building, Council Chambers. City Council members and City staff members will be physically present at the Municipal building for this meeting. The public may participate in these ways: 1. Attend the meeting in person at City Hall. Use the appropriate roster to sign up to speak upon arrival. 2. Provide comment in advance at www.wheatridgespeaks.org (comment by noon on May 18, 2026) 3. Virtually attend and participate in the meeting through a device or phone: Click here to pre-register and provide public comment by Zoom (You must preregister before 5:00 p.m. on May 18, 2026) 4. View the meeting live or later at www.wheatridgespeaks.org, Channel 8, or YouTube Live at https://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/view Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. The City will upon request, provide auxiliary aids and services leading to effective communication for people with disabilities, including qualified sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, documents in Braille, and other ways of making communications accessible to people who have speech, hearing, or vision impairments. To request auxiliary aid, service for effective communication, or document in a different format, please use this form or contact ADA Coordinator, (Kelly McLaughlin at ada@ci.wheatridge.co.us or 303-235-2885) as soon as possible, preferably 7 days before the activity or event. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS APPROVAL OF MINUTES None APPROVAL OF AGENDA PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES None PUBLICS’ RIGHT TO SPEAK a. Public may speak on any matter not on the agenda for a maximum of 3 minutes under Publics’ Right to Speak. Please speak up to be heard when directed by the mayor. b. Members of the Public who wish to speak on a Public Hearing item or Decision, Resolution, or Motion may speak when directed by the mayor at the conclusion of the staff report for that specific agenda item. c. Members of the Public may comment on any agenda item in writing by noon on the day of the meeting at www.WheatRidgeSpeaks.org. Comments made on Wheat Ridge Speaks are considered part of the public record. CONSENT AGENDA None PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING 1. Review a previously issued Special Use permit (SUP-23-01) and associated conditions related to Lakeside Autowash ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING None DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND MOTIONS None CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS ITEM NUMBER: 1 DATE: May 18, 2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MOTION TITLE: REVIEW OF A PREVIOUSLY ISSUED SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP-23-01) AND ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS RELATED TO LAKESIDE AUTOWASH ☒PUBLIC HEARING ☒BIDS/MOTIONS ☐RESOLUTIONS ☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING ☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING QUASI-JUDICIAL ☒YES ☐NO ISSUE: The purpose of this public hearing is for City Council to review the Special Use Permit for Lakeside Autowash, located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue. Pursuant to Section 26-114.F of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, City Council shall determine whether modification, additional conditions, or revocation is warranted based on operational impacts. PRIOR ACTION: City Council has taken no prior action on this item. The original Special Use Permit (SUP) issued to Lakeside Autowash (“Autowash”) was approved administratively by the Community Development Director. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact associated with this action. BACKGROUND: Summarized below is a brief history of the property, the SUP approval, and the recent pattern of operational issues. Several attachments are referenced below to supplement this background. Subject Site and Prior Use The subject property is located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, at the southwest corner of 44th Avenue and Gray Street. The property is zoned Commercial-One (C-1), and the surrounding area is primarily commercial, with a residential neighborhood located to the Council Action Form – Lakeside Autowash SUP May 18, 2026 Page 2 south. More specifically, the properties that are immediately adjacent to the site are commercially-zoned and contain commercial land uses. The low-density residential neighborhood is just beyond, to the south. The site operated as a carwash for 25 years, from 1997 to 2022. It previously consisted of four open self-service bays, one automatic bay, and a series of vacuums. Refer to Attachment 1 (Background and Timeline) for a zoning map of the area and images of the prior site configuration. Special Use Permit From 2022 through 2024, Autowash pursued redevelopment of the site, proposing to replace the prior carwash with a new automatic facility. Because carwashes are permitted only through a Special Use Permit (SUP) in the C-1 zone district, the proposal required discretionary review through Case No. SUP-23-01. The application materials included a written narrative, a response to the SUP review criteria, a site plan, and architectural elevations. The architectural elevations depicted wash bays with doors on both sides, consistently shown in the closed position. The SUP process included a neighborhood meeting, multiple rounds of review, and public notice. No comments were received during the formal public notice period prior to approval. On January 16, 2024, the SUP was approved based on findings that the use would not have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area and would not create impacts greater than those allowed under the existing zoning. Staff supported the SUP for several reasons related to location, context, design, and prior use: • Autowash was replacing and upgrading the same land use that had been present on the site since 1997, and there was no reason to believe there would be impacts greater than those previously on site or greater than allowed under the C-1 zoning. • The site is located on and oriented to W. 44th Avenue, one of the city’s minor arterial roadways where such land use is appropriate based on the existing conditions of the roadway, other auto-oriented land uses on the corridor, and the road’s designation in the City’s comprehensive plan. • The architectural drawings depicted doors on both sides of the new bays, an upgrade from the previously operating carwash. • The new carwash was not expected to have a detrimental effect on the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. • There had been no history of code compliance issues with the prior carwash use. Council Action Form – Lakeside Autowash SUP May 18, 2026 Page 3 Findings and conditions of approval were included in the approved SUP. Refer to Attachments 2 and 3 for the SUP approval and application contents. Operational History and Code Enforcement Response The new carwash began operations in February 2025. Within weeks, the City began receiving complaints from nearby residents related to noise, hours of operation, and operational characteristics. Complaints were received through multiple channels, including phone calls, emails, service requests, social media posts, and testimony at City Council meetings. Initial concerns focused on dryer noise, 24-hour operations, and the operation of the facility with bay doors open. Throughout March and April 2025, code enforcement officers from the Police Department’s Community Services Team responded to multiple complaints and conducted sound measurements on several occasions. While code enforcement actions address discrete violations at specific points in time, they do not resolve broader questions related to how a land use operates on an ongoing basis. In this case, the pattern of complaints and observed conditions raised concerns not only about compliance with noise limits, but also about whether the use, as operated, remained consistent with the assumptions and approval criteria of the Special Use Permit. Accordingly, in parallel with code enforcement actions, the City initiated a broader administrative review focused on achieving voluntary compliance and addressing operational impacts within the framework of the SUP. Community Development Response and Voluntary Compliance Efforts Beginning in spring 2025, the City initiated a coordinated effort with Autowash seeking to achieve voluntary compliance and to address operational impacts. These efforts spanned a period of six months and included: • Multiple meetings with Autowash, legal counsel, and sound consultants; • Requests for operational changes and technical analysis; • Issuance of a Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance in June 2025; • Acceptance of Autowash’s voluntary 90-day closure to allow for mitigation starting June 30, 2025; • Review of a sound study and proposed improvements, including a sound fence/wall; • Coordination on reopening conditions, including reduced hours and limited bay operations; Council Action Form – Lakeside Autowash SUP May 18, 2026 Page 4 • Ongoing communication, monitoring, and the offer of third-party mediation; and • Independent third-party sound analysis commissioned by the City. After closing the carwash for four months, Autowash reopened in November 2025 under modified conditions, including reduced hours (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM) and operation of only three bays. Despite these efforts, the City continued to receive complaints, and staff observations have indicated that operational issues persist, including inconsistent use of bay doors, noise impacts, and overflowing trash cans. Refer to Attachment 1 (Background and Timeline), Attachment 4 (Letter Correspondence), and Attachment 5 (Sound Studies) for additional detail on these efforts. Over the course of more than one year, the City pursued voluntary compliance, operational adjustments, technical study, and facilitated dialogue. While some mitigation measures have been implemented, impacts to the surrounding area have not been consistently resolved. APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The City’s evaluation of Autowash has been guided by state and local noise standards and the discretionary criteria governing Special Use Permits. Noise Standards The City has evaluated operations relative to applicable noise standards, including Section 16-103 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and relevant state provisions. Sound measurements have been conducted by Community Service Officers and two separate third-party consultants (Attachments 1 and 5). Local noise standards in Chapter 16 reference both reasonableness and decibel standards. Applicable state law (C.R.S. §25-12-103) establishes thresholds based on time of day and type of receptor: Daytime 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Nighttime 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM In response to initial sound readings in summer 2025, Autowash implemented several mitigation measures, including installation of a six-foot sound wall/fence, discontinuation of the fourth bay, and modifications to vacuum and dryer equipment. The City’s third-party sound study in March 2026 evaluated typical operations and the effectiveness of these changes. Results indicate that some operational conditions fall Council Action Form – Lakeside Autowash SUP May 18, 2026 Page 5 within applicable limits, while others do not, depending on factors such as wash phase, number of active bays, and whether bay doors are open or closed. While these studies provide useful technical information, they also demonstrate that noise levels vary based on how the facility is operated, and that compliance is not consistently achieved under all conditions. Both Autowash and the City invested significant time and money measuring noise levels with the hope that strict compliance with state decibel limits and city noise codes would resolve neighborhood impacts. Ultimately, the Community Development Director determined that compliance with noise standards alone did not resolve the impacts of the carwash operations on the neighborhood. Accordingly, those impacts are the basis for the notice of violation and this hearing. Special Use Permit Standards Pursuant to Section 26-114 of the Code, special uses are discretionary and must be designed, developed, operated, and maintained to mitigate potential adverse impacts. Previously approved SUPs may be revoked or modified if those criteria are no longer met. While compliance with specific decibel thresholds has been evaluated and is required, noise standards alone do not determine whether a Special Use Permit remains appropriate. The Code outlines nine criteria for review of an SUP (Section 26-114.D), and the following are particularly relevant: • The use will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood; and • The use will not create adverse impacts greater than those allowed under existing zoning. ANALYSIS: The Code requires that “all conditions and stipulations imposed by the community development director or city council shall be maintained during the entire term of the special use. If at any time the stipulations or conditions are not adhered to or are found to have been materially altered in scope, application or design, the director of community development shall investigate, and if appropriate, initiate revocation proceedings….“ Code, Section 26-114.F. (emphasis supplied) In this case, the Community Development Director has determined that the operation of the facility under the SUP has in fact been altered in scope, application or design, in that the facility is operating with bay doors open, and further that it is operating at levels that are not consistently below those required by the Code. These changes in the manner in which the facility operates trigger the basis for enforcement under Code 26-114.F. Council Action Form – Lakeside Autowash SUP May 18, 2026 Page 6 Based on the operational history described above and in Attachment 1, including staff observations, neighborhood statements, and ongoing compliance efforts since February 2025, staff has evaluated the use against the applicable Special Use Permit criteria. Staff finds the following: • The operation of the carwash is resulting in ongoing adverse impacts to the surrounding area, particularly related to noise and operational characteristics; and • The facility is not operating in a manner consistent with the representations and assumptions underlying SUP approval, including the depiction and expected use of enclosed bays. These findings are not based on a single incident, but on a documented pattern of operational impacts and well-meaning but ultimately unsuccessful attempts to achieve sustained compliance through voluntary measures. While mitigation efforts have been undertaken, they have not resulted in sustained compatibility with the surrounding area. Accordingly, staff finds that City Council review of the SUP is warranted. OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO COUNCIL: The Code does not provide administrative authority for the Community Development Director to modify the SUP or its conditions of approval. Instead, Section 26-114.F authorizes City Council to revoke the Special Use Permit, require corrective measures, and/or modify the conditions of approval. City Council may take any of the following actions pursuant to Section 26-114.F: • Option 1 – Modify the Special Use Permit – Modify the SUP to include additional conditions intended to mitigate impacts and bring the use into compliance with review criteria. Potential conditions include: a. Bay Doors Closed: All bay doors (north and south) shall remain fully closed during all wash and dry cycles. Doors may be opened only for vehicle entry and exit. b. Hours of Operation: All carwash operations (including vacuum use, testing, and maintenance) shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. c. On-Site Signage: The operator shall install and maintain signage in visible locations requesting that customers minimize noise, including prohibiting amplified music while on site. Council Action Form – Lakeside Autowash SUP May 18, 2026 Page 7 d. Site Maintenance: The operator shall install and regularly service trash cans which are appropriately sized to accommodate trash deposited by customers without the potential for overflow. e. Noise Compliance: The operation shall comply with all applicable noise standards, including state law (C.R.S. § 25-12-103, as amended) and those set forth in Section 16-103 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. f. Monitoring: Upon request by the City, the operator shall conduct and submit sound measurements prepared by a qualified professional to demonstrate compliance. Such requests may be made under circumstances that include but are not limited to, equipment changes, operational changes, or recommissioning of the eastern bay. Failure to comply with all conditions imposed or a continued pattern of impact on the neighborhood could result in further enforcement action, including additional review or revocation of the Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 26-114.F. • Option 2 – Retain the Existing SUP – Allow the Special Use Permit to remain in effect without modification. • Option 3 – Revoke the Special Use Permit – Revoke the SUP pursuant to Section 26-114.F, determining that the use no longer meets the required criteria. Autowash has been advised of these potential options and conditions. Included in Attachment 6 is the packet they have submitted for City Council review. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend Option 1, Modification of the Special Use Permit, to add operational conditions to the previously approved SUP. This approach recognizes the City’s preference for achieving compliance, allowing the use to continue, and also providing enforceable standards to address ongoing impacts. Should compliance not be achieved under modified conditions, further action, including revocation, may be reconsidered in the future. OPTIONAL MOTIONS: The motions provided below correspond to the options presented above. These or any other motion may be considered by City Council: Option 1 – Modify the Special Use Permit: “I move to require the following corrective measures to be taken and conditions to be applied to the Special Use Permit for Lakeside Autowash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue: Council Action Form – Lakeside Autowash SUP May 18, 2026 Page 8 • [ Insert from list above: identify by letter a through f ] • [ Other conditions, if applicable ] And further direct the City Attorney to prepare findings memorializing the Council’s decision for signature by the Mayor as the final decision of the City Council on the matter.” Option 2 – Retain the Existing SUP: “I move to leave the Special Use Permit in effect without modification for Lakeside Autowash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue and further direct the City Attorney to prepare findings memorializing the Council’s decision for signature by the Mayor as the final decision of the City Council on the matter.” Option 3 – Revoke the Special Use Permit: “I move to revoke the Special Use Permit for Lakeside Autowash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue and further direct the City Attorney to prepare findings memorializing the Council’s decision for signature by the Mayor as the final decision of the City Council on the matter.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Lauren Mikulak, Community Development Director Jana Easley, Planning Manager Jerry Dahl, City Attorney Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Background and Timeline 2. SUP Approval Form and Approved Site Plan 3. SUP Application Submittals 4. Letter Correspondence between City and Autowash 5. Sound Studies 6. Autowash Submittal to City Council ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Lakeside Autowash Background and Timeline of Events This attachment provides a chronological summary of the Lakeside Autowash project at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, including site history, permit approvals, construction, operations, and ongoing compliance and enforcement issues. It is intended to provide a clear factual record of events leading up to the May 18, 2026 public hearing. The document is organized into the following sections: A. Subject Site Summary B. Site Conditions Summary C. Special Use Permit D. Construction E. Noise Complaints & Code Enforcement Response F. Community Development Response G. Closure Activities H. Reopening & Continued Impacts A. Subject Site Summary • Address: 5900 W. 44th Avenue • Current Zoning: Commercial-One (C-1) • Current Use: Automatic Carwash (“Lakeside Autowash”) • Case Number: SUP-23-01 B. Site Conditions Summary • The property is located west of Gray Street on the south side of W. 44th Avenue. • The property is zoned Commercial-One (C-1), a zone district that allows for a wide range of commercial land uses including oﬃce, retail, and service. • Immediately adjacent properties are all zoned commercially with a mix of land uses: o Commercial-One (C-1) to the west (EZ Pawn) o Restricted Commercial (RC) to the south (vet clinic) and to the east (Flesher Hinton Music) o Immediately north of the site is the Town of Lakeside including a gas station, 7-Eleven, Key Bank, Les Schwab Tires, and Walmart o Further to the south is a residential neighborhood, predominantly zoned Residential-Three (R-3) 2 o The nearest residential property at 4360 Gray Street is zoned Mixed Use- Neighborhood (MU-N). It was rezoned from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to MU-N in 2014 (Case No. WZ-14-07) and issued a residential Certiﬁcate of Occupancy in November 2014. o Refer to zoning and land use map in Figure B.1 below. Figure B.1 - Map showing zoning and land use • According to the Jefferson County Assessor, the site is approximately 19,450 square feet (0.447 acres) in size. • Based on city permit records, a Certiﬁcate of Occupancy for a carwash was issued in July 1997. o The prior carwash included ﬁve (5) bays: four (4) open coin-operated self- serve bays and one (1) automatic bay with doors. It also included vacuums on the south side of the property. o Based on city business license records, the prior carwash was operational from 1997 through December 2022. o Refer to Google Streetview images in Figures B.2 and B.3 below for prior site conditions. 3 Figure B.2 - View from Gray Street in March 2022 looking west at the prior carwash with wash bays on the north half of the site (at right) and vacuums on the south half (at left). Figure B.3 - View from W. 44th Avenue in March 2022 looking south at prior carwash which had 4 manual wash bays to the west (at right) and 1 automatic bay to the east (at left). C. Special Use Permit • July 12, 2022 – A pre-application meeting is held with city staff, Dennis Dreeszen (Autowash owner), and designers from Hover Architecture. 4 o The development proposal includes demolition and replacement of the existing ﬁve-bay carwash with a four-bay automatic carwash. o Under the C-1 zoning, the request required a neighborhood meeting and special use permit (SUP). • August 30, 2022 – The required neighborhood meeting is held on Zoom. Letter notice is sent to property owners and occupants within 600 feet (the distance requirement at the time). • February 13, 2023 – A complete application is submitted, including a site plan (Case No. WSP-23-01), special use permit (Case No. SUP-23-01), and consolidation plat (Case No. MS-24-04). o The owners are represented by Hover Architecture throughout the application submittal, revisions and review. o The application goes through four rounds of review prior to approval. o Like many site plan applications, the submittal (including the written narrative) focuses on the site design and building architecture, describing the site circulation and design but not detailing the mechanical equipment within the carwash bays. o The written narrative states: “The proposed new car wash replaces an existing car wash. It will not have a detrimental effect on the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood.” o The architectural elevations depict doors on both sides of all bays, and depict the doors closed in all versions of the rendering. o Neither the submittals nor comment letters discuss noise or operations. Staff assumed that doors would be closed as depicted in the rendering and that replacing a carwash with four open bays with a newer carwash with four closed bays would result in an improved condition. • December 20, 2023 – Letter notice is sent to all adjacent property owners (per Section 26-114.C.5.b) notifying recipients that the SUP has been requested and providing a 10-day comment period. The property is also posted during the same comment period. No comments are received. • January 16, 2024 – The Special Use Permit is approved based on several ﬁndings related to the criteria for review (Section 26-114.D) and with several standard conditions. Staff supports the SUP for several reasons related to location, context, design, and prior use: o The carwash is replacing and upgrading the same land use that had been present on the site since 1997, and staff had no reason to believe there 5 would be impacts exceeding those which had previously been present or creating impacts greater than allowed under the C-1 zoning. o The site is located on and oriented to W. 44th Avenue, one of the city’s minor arterials where such land use is appropriate based on the existing conditions of the roadway and the road’s designation in the city’s comprehensive plan. o The site is entirely surrounded by commercial zoning. o The architectural drawings depict doors on both sides of the new bays, an upgrade from the previously operating carwash. o The new carwash is not expected to have a detrimental effect on the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. o There has been no history of code compliance issues with the prior carwash use. D. Construction • April 12, 2024 – A demolition permit application is received, and the permit is issued (Permit No. 202400741) to remove the existing carwash. • April 18, 2024 – A building permit application is received (Permit No. 202400776) to construct a new carwash. The contents of the permit are consistent with the designs approved as part of the site plan and SUP. • July 3, 2024 – The building permit is issued. • December 31, 2024 – Per Assessor records, Autowash closes on the property. • January 3, 2025 – A business license application is received for the new carwash. • February 2, 2025 – Construction is completed, the permit is closed, and a Certiﬁcate of Occupancy is issued. E. Noise Complaints & Code Enforcement Response • Mid-February 2025 – Autowash oﬃcially opens the new carwash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue. • March 2025 – Soon after opening, the City begins to receive reports of noise issues through several channels from nearby neighbors, including social media posts, outreach to councilmembers, phone calls with the Police Department, service requests, and testimony at the March 24 City Council meeting. The Police Department’s Community Services Team (CST) opens a case and initiates sound readings. 6 o Initial noise complaints relate to dryer noise, bay doors being open during operations, and 24-hour operations. o Autowash explains that water vapor and humidity require the doors to be open. • March 9, 2025 – CST responds to a noise complaint and observes use of all four wash bays at different times and cycles. Sound readings range from 61 to 85 decibels (dB). • March 11, 2025 – CST contacts Autowash who agrees to have technicians adjust the bay doors to remain partially closed in an effort to mitigate noise. o Sound readings are taken from 4360 Gray Street, ranging from 47 to 57 dB, increasing to 62 dB during dryer activation. o Additional readings from 4355 Gray Street range from 66 to 74 dB, with backyard readings ranging from 53 to 57 dB. o Technicians are observed adjusting the wash doors. o A Notice of Violation is issued and mailed for Section 16-103 (Unreasonable Noise / Disturbing the Peace). • March 25, 2025 – CST conducts additional sound readings and contacts Autowash. Readings for one operating bay exceed 65 dB, ranging from 62 to 72 dB, even with south doors closed. Compliance deadline is extended after communicating with Autowash. • March 30, 2025 – CST conducts additional sound readings, ranging from 50 to 69 dB. • April 3, 2025 – CST conducts additional sound readings from 4355 Gray Street, ranging from 53 to 70 dB. The City’s CST Supervisor and Planning Manager meet with the Autowash owners to discuss the complaints, operations, sound readings, and violations. o Staff advise that proactive mitigation measures implemented to date are not suﬃcient to achieve compliance with applicable noise limits. o Autowash states the issue is related to incomplete installation of absorbent tape and sound matting. o A summons (M-67909) is issued for Section 16-103 and Section 26-114 (Special Uses) for failure to meet the March 31, 2025 compliance deadline. o A Municipal Court date of May 1, 2025 is scheduled. • April 8, 2025 – CST meets with an Autowash technician and conducts additional sound readings. Sound readings range from 52 to 68 dB during varied wash and 7 dryer cycles. Additional readings further south on Gray Street range from 56 to 61 dB. • April 16, 2025 – Patrol oﬃcers conduct additional sound readings ranging from 54 to 70 dB. • April 28, 2025 – Neighbors testify during Public’s Right to Speak at the City Council meeting. • May 1, 2025 – Based on the summons issued by CST, Autowash appears in Municipal Court for the date-speciﬁc noise violations. Initially, they plead not guilty, and the case is set for a pre-trial conference. CST Supervisor meets with Autowash and encourages dialogue with the City Prosecutor, and they agree. Autowash is encouraged to meet with city staff to explore longer-term solutions. Ultimately, prosecution is deferred. F. Community Development Response • May 1, 2025 – The City’s Community Development Director (CDD) reaches out to Autowash via email to make introductions, explain noise concerns, and request that they engage a sound consultant to verify if their operations are compliant with the city’s noise limits. Several emails are exchanged from May 1 through May 19. Autowash engages legal representation, and a group meeting is set for May 29. • May 29, 2025 – A meeting is held with Autowash, their counsel, their sound consultant, Community Development Director, Planning Manager, and City Attorney. Discussion focuses on impacts, mitigation, operations, SUP code, and sound study needs. • June 9, 2025 – In a series of emails, the Autowash team is provided with copies of the March and April resident testimony at City Council (via minutes and video recordings). Speciﬁc sound measurement locations are requested based on reported impacts. • June 16, 2025 – Neighbors testify about impacts during Public’s Right to Speak at the City Council meeting. • June 17, 2025 – CDD communicates new testimony to Autowash team and requests an update on operations and sound study. In response, the Autowash team reported the following updates in a June 20 email: o Sound study to be completed mid-July o Hours modiﬁed manually to 7:00am to 9:55pm o Sound dampening panels installed in bays in April o Vacuum motors replaced and sound dampening installed to reduce noise on May 8 8 o Exploring additional sound dampening measures internally and with equipment manufacturers o Closed south side doors during wash and dry cycle beginning mid-March; north side doors remain open during wash and dry cycle due to moisture • June 24, 2025 – CDD issues a Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance documenting two violations: o Doors are open despite depictions of them being closed in the SUP o Operational noise impacts are having a detrimental effect on the neighborhood. The notice outlines seven (7) corrective actions and their associated deadlines, noting that failure to comply would result in a revocation hearing. • June 25, 2025 – Autowash responds promptly, sending a letter through their counsel disagreeing with the City’s ﬁnding of noncompliance, but proposing a 90- day voluntary closure of the carwash. Autowash proposes to suspend all operations, obtain a sound study, and coordinate with the City on potential mitigation. • June 26, 2025 – The City accepts the 90-day closure proposal and stays the Notice of Noncompliance. • June 30, 2025 – The 90-day closure begins, extending through late September. The closure is communicated to all parties. • July 1, 2025 – Regarding the criminal citation and summons, the City Prosecutor notiﬁes the City Attorney and staff that Autowash requested deferred prosecution based on their working with the city to address noise issues. This was offered and accepted. The terms of the deferred prosecution require no further violations for a period of one year. This was accepted by the Court. G. Closure Activities • July 2, 2025 – CDD messages Autowash because numerous customers are in touch with the City under the impression the City ordered closure of the carwash. • July 14, 2025 – Autowash sound consultant scheduled for testing. • September 15, 2025 – CDD sends letter requesting an update and a copy of the sound study. • September 19, 2025 – Autowash sound study is provided to the City. • September 25, 2025 – A meeting is held with Autowash, their counsel, their sound consultant, Community Development Director, Planning Manager, and City Attorney. Discussion focuses on results of the sound study, its recommendation for a sound wall, review of state/local noise limits, long-term plans. 9 • September 25, 2025 – As a follow-up to the meeting, Autowash emails a sketch plan for the sound fence design. CDD conﬁrms the proposed design would likely be exempted from a building permit and requests that the sound consultant and contractor coordinate to conﬁrm the proposed design will comply with the recommendations in the sound study. • September 26, 2025 – Autowash sends letter to the City proposing conditional reopening: closure will continue until sound fence is installed, after opening hours will be 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM, sound consultant will retest after the sound fence is installed. • September 30, 2025 – The City accepts this proposal, and requires that Autowash contact the City before reopening to the public to conﬁrm all requirements have been met. • October 6, 2025 – An Autowash contractor is in touch with the City’s Planning Manager and Chief Building Oﬃcial to review the proposed sound fence/wall design. The speciﬁcations from Autowash’s sound study are provided, and staff communicate that a variance would be supported to allow up to 8 feet in height. • October 31, 2025 – CDD messages Autowash to inquire about the status of the sound wall: if they’ve landed on a design, need support for a variance, or have an updated timeline. No response is provided. • November 3, 2025 – The City learns from neighbors that the carwash has reopened. CDD messages Autowash since there was no communication regarding reopening as required in the September 30 letter and no communication since early October. The City requires the carwash to close until all re-opening requirements are complete. • November 7, 2025 – Autowash provides follow-up sound testing and proposes to reopen only three of the four bays. City staff make a site visit and allow the carwash to open under these conditions, restricted to 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM. H. Reopening & Continued Impacts • November 10, 2025 – Neighbors testify during Public’s Right to Speak at the City Council meeting. Noise issues and neighborhood impacts continue to be reported. • November 14, 2025 – CDD messages Autowash and neighbors separately to propose mediation. The City offers to facilitate and pay for a professional mediator and to provide neutral meeting space and coordinate logistics. There is no agreement to proceed with mediation. • November 2025 through January 2026 – Periodic reports are sent from neighbors to staff and council regarding operational conditions and noise. 10 • December 2025 – The City decides to pursue its own third-party testing, reaching out to ﬁve companies and obtaining quotes from two. • January 2026 – Autowash modiﬁes dryers to reduce noise. Doors are inconsistently open and closed during operations, based on staff observations and neighbor reports. • February 6, 2026 – The City schedules coordinated sound testing. The city’s sound consultant, several staff, neighbors, Autowash, and a councilmember meet on site. The purpose of the coordinated test was to mimic a worst-case scenario of simultaneous carwash operations. Only two carwash bays are operational because of damage caused by a customer the day before. The group decides to reschedule testing. • March 2026 – The City’s sound consultant completes typical testing before proceeding with coordinated testing. He obtains measurements on two days— March 10 and March 18. A draft report is provided to the City on March 24. The draft is shared promptly with neighbors and Autowash who each provide feedback. • April 3, 2026 – City staff provide feedback to sound consultant, and a ﬁnal report is provided on April 5. • April 13, 2026 – Neighbors testify during Public’s Right to Speak at the City Council meeting. Noise issues and neighborhood impacts continue to be reported. • April 16, 2026 – CDD issues a Second Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance and Revocation Hearing documenting violations, ﬁndings of noncompliance, and setting a public hearing under Section 26-114.F for Monday, May 11, 2026. The Notice is sent via email and certiﬁed mail. • April 23, 2026 – Based on a stated conﬂict and scheduling request from Autowash and their counsel, CDD issues a Revised Second Notice scheduling the public hearing for Monday, May 18, 2026. • April/May 2026 – Public notice is completed compliance with Code Section 26-109, including published notice, letter notice, and sign notice. Attachment 2 SUP Approval Form and Approved Site Plan Special Use Permit Approval WHEREAS, an application was filed by Hover Architecture for approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP) for a carwash use at 5900 W. 44th Avenue and zoned Commercial-One (Case No. SUP-23-01); and WHEREAS, sign and letter notice was completed as required by Section 26-114 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (the “Code”) and no objections were received; and WHEREAS, the application is eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, staff finds that the application may be approved based on the criteria for review in Section 26-114 of the Code. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a Special Use Permit is granted for a car wash use at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, based on the following findings of fact: 1. The special use will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 2. The special use will not create or contribute to blight in the neighborhood by virtue of physical or operational characteristics. 3. The special use will not create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing zoning for the property. 4. The special use will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off the site. 5. The property is appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. 6. The special use will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. 7. There is a history of compliance by the applicant and/or property owner with Code requirements and prior conditions, if any, regarding the subject property. 8. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. 9. The proposed special use promotes goals and outcomes from applicable portions of the City’s comprehensive plan and any subarea plan applicable to the subject property. And with the following conditions: 1. The special use shall be consistent with the representations depicted in the application materials. 2. The architectural upgrades and site plan modifications shall be consistent with the SUP Site Plan and Elevations. 3. A building permit shall be obtained from the Wheat Ridge Building Division to complete all new construction. 4. The approval of this special use is granted to the applicant and may not be inherited by subsequent operators. 5. A Public Improvement Agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of a vertical building permit. _________________________________ _______________________________ Lauren Mikulak, AICP Date Community Development Director January 16, 2024 SS ST M COCO CO COCO TRANS X X X X X X X X X X W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW GAS GASGASGASGAS GAS GASGASGAS GAS GASGAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SSSSSSSS SS SS SS SSSSSSSS SS SS SS OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE ST ST ST ST STSTST W ST ST OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE SS SSSSSSSS W WWWWW W GAS GASGASGASGAS T E E GAS GASGAS OHE OHE SS SSSS ST STST W WW X X PROPOSED CAR WASH BUILDING 3,539 SF L=23.49' R=15.00' Δ=89°44'08" LOT 1 & 3 - STEVENSON SUBDIVISION #5990 WEST 44TH AVE. 1-STORY BLOCK BUILDING LOT 6 - STEVENSON SUBDIVISION #4355 GRAY STREET 54' - 0" 81'-4" LOT 1 - LAKESIDE AUTOWASH SUBDIVISION #5900 WEST 44TH AVE 43.109 32.911 32.600 03.150 43.105 43.106 32.800 43.110 1 4 EQ U I P M E N T RO O M AU T O M A T I C BA Y 1 AU T O M A T I C BA Y 2 AU T O M A T I C BA Y 3 AU T O M A T I C BA Y 4 02.106 32.900 32.21032.210 32.21032.210 03.140 03.140 32.21032.210 32.21032.210 27'-9" 40'-8" 19'-7" ZONE 2'- 0 " U T I L I T Y SIDEWALK 8' - 0 " 01.106 01.107 BUFFER 2'-0" SIDEWALK 5'-0"36 ' - 2 " 01.108 01.108 10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0" AT ADA PARKING 18'-6" FLUSH CURB 03.251 3'-7"17'-6"20'-0"5'-8" 16'-0" 14'-0" 14'-0" 33.400 16'-0" 4'-4" 10'-8" 10'-0" 12'-2" 13'-0" TYP. 5'-0" 11'-0" R.O.W. 8' - 0 " A D D I T I O N A L OF R.O.W. 30 ' - 0 " T O C L PRIMARY STREET FRONTAGE BUILD-TO 88'-0" WITHIN 1'-4" R.O.W. 1'-6" ADDITIONAL OF R.O.W. 25'-0" TO CL 115.97' N89°58'27"E 13 9 . 5 4 ' S 0 0 ° 1 7 ' 2 5 " E 129.43' S89°52'45"W 14 6 . 6 9 ' N 0 0 ° 1 6 ' 5 1 " W W 44TH AVE N G R A Y S T 28'-6"2'-6"12'-8"2'-6"28'-6"4'-8" 5'-3" 46'-6" 56 ' - 4 " 46'-9" 20 ' - 8 " 16 ' - 0 " L=23.49' R=15.00' Δ=89°44'08" 8'-0" 01.111 01.111 01.11301.113 01.112 01.110 01.114 01.109 114.47' N89°58'27"E 8. 0 0 ' 1.50' 13 1 . 5 4 ' S 0 0 ° 1 7 ' 2 5 " E 01.116 10 ' - 0 " R E A R S E T B A C K ( C - 1 ) AMENITY BUFFER 2' - 0 " M I N LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' - 0 " M I N . TRADITIONAL OVERLAY (0-12' BUILD-TO) 50 ' - 0 " F R O N T S E T B A C K ( C - 1 ) TRADITIONAL OVERLAY (0-12' BUILD-TO) 30' - 0" STREET SIDE SETBACK (C-1)5' - 0" SIDE SETBACK (C-1) 32.912 32.91232.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 32.912 01.117 PB 33.220 PB 01.117 15 4 . 6 9 ' N 0 0 ° 1 6 ' 5 1 " W 130.93' S89°52'45"W 33.430 VACUUM STANCHION PARKING SPACE CROSSWALK ADA RAMP ADA SYMBOL AUTO CASHIER ISLAND CANOPY PIPE BOLLARD WHEEL STOP TRASH ENCLOSURE SYMBOL LEGEND TRANSFORMER FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY MAN HOLE WATER METER UNDERGROUND TANK PROPERTY SITE LINE ELECTRIC LINE GAS LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE SANITARY LINE STORM LINE WATER LINE FENCE LINE LEGEND PROPERTY BUFFER PROPERTY SETBACK HATCH LEGEND ASPHALT CURB & GUTTER ROCK SIDEWALK BUILDING LANDSCAPE CONCRETE PAVING SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 3 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 2 8 : 5 6 P M As indicated SITE PLAN 2202.58 2 3/11/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1" = 10'-0"2 SITE PLAN1 N KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 01.106 ADA ACCESSIBLE PATH. 01.107 SITE BENCH. 01.108 PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, RE: ELECTRICAL. 01.109 EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED BELOW GROUND (CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDED) 01.110 PROPOSED ADA CURB RAMP 12:1 (MAX) (TYPE 1 - DIRECTIONAL RAMP) 01.111 PROPOSED CURB RAMP (TYPE 2 PARALLEL) 12:1 (MAX) 01.112 PROPOSED ADA CURB RAMP 12:1 (MAX) (TYPE 2 - DIRECTIONAL RAMP) 01.113 PROPOSED ADA RAMP 12:1 (MAX) TYPE 2 - TWO RAMPS 01.114 PROPOSED CURB RAMP 12:1 (MAX) (TYPE 1 - DIRECTIONAL RAMP) 01.116 SIDEWALK CHASE, RE: CIVIL. 01.117 STREET LIGHT PULL BOX, RE: LIGHTING DETAILS. 02.106 EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE TO REMAIN. 03.140 CONCRETE APRON, RE: CIVIL 03.150 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 03.251 PRE-CAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 32.210 CONCRETE PAVING, RE: CIVIL. 32.600 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, RE: CIVIL. 32.800 LANDSCAPE, RE: LANDSCAPE PLANS. 32.900 CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. 32.911 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL. 32.912 TRAFFIC FLOW. FOR SITE PLANNING ONLY, NOT TO BE PHYSICALLY PAINTED. 33.220 GAS METER LOCATION, RE: PLUMBING. 33.400 ELECTRICAL SERVICE ENTRANCE. 33.430 ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER, RE: ELECTRICAL. 43.105 TRASH ENCLOSURE, REFER TO SITE DETAILS. 43.106 PAY STATION, REFER TO EQUIPMENT CUT SHEETS. 43.109 UNDERGROUND SAND OIL INTERCEPTOR, RE: EQUIPMENT. 43.110 VACUUM STANCHION WITH ATTACHED PRODUCER. SCALE : 1" = 10'-0" 0 10'20' ST COCO CO COCO TRANS W. 44TH AVE. N G R A Y S T 1 QUCR 3 COCB 1 PIPB 3 MIST 3 PHNA 3 PIMS 3 PHNA 3 MIST 4 BETH 5 RHFR 4 BETH 1 PIPB 3 PIMS 5 CAKF 1 ACAG 1 JUBU 7 CAKF 1 JUBU 1 ACAG 1 JUBU 3 COCB 3 SPFT 1 PIPB 1 GLSK 3 COCB 3 MIGR 1 QUCR 1 QUCR3 RIAL3 PIMS 3 PIMS LEGEN SMBOL ESCRIPTION ROCK MULCH ECIUOUS TREE EISTING TREE TO BE REMOE ECIUOUS SHRUBS EERGREEN SHRUBS ORNAMENTAL GRASS CONCRETE PAING BROALEAF EERGREEN SHRUBS EERGREEN TREE PAERS SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 CM CM 33 INERNESS PK STE 175 ENGLEOO CO 11 7 773 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 55 S LOELL BL UNIT3 LITTLETON CO 13 33337 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5 N 1 SCALE 11 LANSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN 3 3 STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF GROSS LOT AREA AREA REQUIRE AREA PROIE 34 SF 33 SF SITE ATA LOT AREA 13 SF 44 ACRES STREET CALCULATION QT REQUIRE QT PROIE 44TH AENUE AMENIT ONE LESS THAN FIE FEET NA NA GRA STREET ATTACHE SIEALK NO AMENIT ONE NA NA STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT STREET CALCULATION LENGTH QT REQUIRE QT PROIE 44TH AENUE 1 TREE 3 LF 3 FT 1 4 GRA STREET 1 TREE 3 LF 11 FT 1 4 3 NOTES 1 AUTOMATIC UNERGROUN IRRIGATION SSTEM ILL BE PROIE FOR ALL ONSITE PLANTINGS LANSCAPE AREA PLANTING REQUIREMENT ESCRIPTION CALCULATION AREA QT REQUIRE QT PROIE SITE AREA 1 TREE 1 SF 34 SF 4 4 1 SHRUBS 1 SF 34 SF 3 7 ECIUOUS TREES QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIE ACAG ACER RUBRUM JFSK7 ARMSTRONG GOL MAPLE B B CAL GLSK 1 GLEITSIA INERMIS SKLINE SKLINE HONELOCUST B B CAL QUCR 3 QUERCUS CRIMSCHMIT CRIMSON SPIRE OAK B B CAL EERGREEN TREES QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIE PIPB 3 PICEA PUNGENS BAKERI BAKERI SPRUCE B B BROALEAF EERGREENS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT COCB COTONEASTER AMMERI CORAL BEAUT CORAL BEAUT COTONEASTER 5 GAL ECIUOUS SHRUBS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT BETH BERBERIS THUNBERGII ATROPURPUREA RE BARBERR 5 GAL PHNA PHSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS NANUS ARF NINEBARK 5 GAL RHFR 5 RHAMNUS FRANGULA COLUMNARIS COLUMNAR BUCKTHORN 5 GAL RIAL 3 RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT 5 GAL SPFT 3 SPIRAEA FRITSCHIANA FRITCH SPIREA 5 GAL EERGREEN SHRUBS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT JUBU 3 JUNIPERUS SABINA BUFFALO BUFFALO JUNIPER 5 GAL PIMS 1 PINUS MUGO SLOMOUN SLOMOUN MUGO PINE 5 GAL ORNAMENTAL GRASS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAKF 1 CALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFLORA KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REE GRASS 5 GAL MIGR 3 MISCANTHUS SINENSIS GRACILLIMUS MAIEN GRASS 5 GAL MIST MISCANTHUS SINENSIS STRICTUS EBRA GRASS 5 GAL PLANT SCHEULE SIE NOTES 1 ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET OR ECEE CURRENT AMERICAN STANAR FOR NURSER STOCK ANSI 1 AN THE COLORAO NURSER ACT AN ACCOMPANING RULES AN REGULATIONS NOTES 1 IMENSION ECLUES ENTR RIE ITH SHRUB QUANTIT OERAGES HAE BEEN PROIE TO MAKE UP FOR EFICIENCIES IN THE TREE REQUIREMENTS THE OERAGES PROIE INCLUE SHRUBS AN ORNAMENTAL GRASSES CALCULATE AS 1 SHRUBSORNAMENTAL GRASSES ARE EQUAL TO ONE TREE AN AITIONAL 3 SHRUBS HAE BEEN PROIE TO MEET THE TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENT SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 CM CM 33 INERNESS PK STE 175 ENGLEOO CO 11 7 773 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 55 S LOELL BL UNIT3 LITTLETON CO 13 33337 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE NOTES AND DETAILS 4 METAL T POST STAKES ITH PROTECTIE CAP RIE MIN 4 FIRML INTO SUBGRAE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING 1 GAUGE GAL GU IRES AT 3 ABOE GRAE 1 IA 1 PC PIPE ON EACH IRE PLANT SO THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS ABOE FINISHE GRAE PLACE FERTILIER PER SPECS PRIOR TO MULCH APPLICATION APPL CEAR MULCH ITH A 3 IA MULCH RING HEN LOCATE IN GRASS OR SEE AREAS KEEP MULCH FROM CONTACTING TRUNK OF TREE MULCH AS SPECIFIE FORM SAUCER 3 CONT RIM CUT AN REMOE ALL TINE RAPPING AN BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF BALL ATER AN TAMP POCKETS TO REMOE AIR 3 TAMPE TOPSOIL SCARIF EISTING SOIL TO 4 EPTH ECIUOUS TREE 1 1 BALL IA CUT AN REMOE ALL TINEIRE BASKET FROM ROOTBALL 3 NOTES 1 O NOT CUT LEAER PRUNE ALL AMAGE OR EA OO AFTER PLANTING STAKING MULCHING KEEP CRON SHAPE TPICAL OF SPECIES 3 REMOE ALL PLANTING LABELS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE B LANSCAPE ARCHITECT 4 REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL ESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION PROCEURES TO BE FOLLOE 331 EERGREEN TREE PLANTING 3 1 NOTES 1 O NOT CUT LEAER PRUNE ALL AMAGE OR EA OO AFTER PLANTING STAKING AN MULCHING KEEP CRON SHAPE TPICAL OF SPECIES 3 REMOE ALL PLANTING LABELS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE B LANSCAPE ARCHITECT 4 REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL ESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION PROCEURES TO BE FOLLOE 3 1 GAUGE GAL OUBLE STRAN TISTE GU IRES AT 3 ABOE GRAE ITH 1 IA HITE PC PIPE 3 LENGTH ON EACH IRE PLANT TREE 3 ABOE NURSER GRAE SET TRUNK PLUMB APPL MULCH ITH A 3 IA MULCH RING TP KEEP MULCH FROM CONTACTING TRUNK OF TREE INSTALL A 3 HT ATER RING AT TIME OF PLANTING METAL STAKES 3 PER TREE ALIGNE EQUALL AROUN TREE BUR ANCHOR 1 UNERGROUN USE UCK BILL EARTH ANCHOR OR APPROE EQUAL BACKFILL PLANT PIT ITH AMENE SOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS ATTACH GU IRE TO CANAS STRAP OR APPROE EQUI THROUGH GROMMETS UNISTURBE SOIL BALL IA FULL REMOE ALL TINEIRE BASKET FROM ROOTBALL CUT AN REMOE ALL TINE RAPPING AN BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF BALL N PLAN 3 333 SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASS PLANTING 1 1 1 PLANT SO THAT TOP OF ROOTBALL IS LEEL FINISH GRAE PLACE SPECIFIE FERTILIER PRIOR TO MULCH APPLICATION FEATHER MULCH TO BASE OF SHRUB BRANCHES FORM 3 CONTINUOUS RIM BACKFILL PLANT PIT ITH AMENE SOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS REMOE ALL CONTAINER MATERIAL PLACE OER UNISTURBE SOIL ATER AN TAMP POCKETS TO REMOE AIR UNISTURBE SOILAR ROOTBALL 1 NOTES 1 O NOT CUT LEAER PRUNE ALL AMAGE OR EA OO AFTER PLANTING STAKING MULCHING KEEP CRON SHAPE TPICAL OF SPECIES 3 REMOE ALL PLANTING LABELS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE B LANSCAPE ARCHITECT 4 REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL ESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION PROCEURES TO BE FOLLOE 3 335 4 ST COCO CO COCO TRANS W. 44TH AVE. N G R A Y S T 1"DR A1 1"DR A2 1" 1" 1" R SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 DZ DZ 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 5856 S LOWELL BLVD, UNIT32 #260 LITTLETON, CO 80123 303.883.3278 of 12 205 N 0 10 SCALE: 1"=10'-0" IRRIGATION PLAN IRRIGATION PLAN 5 EXTEND TWO SPARE CONTROL WIRES WITH COMMON FROM CONTROLLER "A" TO INDICATED LOCATION. STUB WIRES IN VALVE BOX CONTAINING QUICK COUPLING VALVE. Know what's below before you dig.Call R IRRIGATION DESIGN LINE SIZE LINE SIZE XCZ-100-PRB-LC 3/4" I.D. SCHEDULE 40 SOLVENT WELD PRO-C SERIES SCHEDULE 40 SOLVENT WELD GPM FEBCO RAIN BIRD HUNTER RAIN BIRD CENTENNIAL PLASTICS CONTROL VALVE SIZE CONTROLLER & STATION NO. DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY DRIP LINE BLOW-OUT STUB ELECTRIC CONTROLLER QUICK COUPLING VALVE BACKFLOW PREVENTER PVC MAINLINE 860 - 3/4" DIA. 44 LRC POLY DRIP TUBING PVC SLEEVING GATE VALVE 2 1 11 7 4 9 MODEL NO.SYMBOL MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION DETAIL NO.COMMENTS TIE ONTO 3/4" COPPER IRRIGATION STUB-OUT AT INDICATED LOCATION. INSTALL 3/4" REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, 3/4" INVERTED BOILER DRAIN AND EXTEND 3/4" K COPPER AT 18"-24" DEPTH AS SHOWN. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF COPPER PIPING WITH CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING FOUNDATION AND/OR FLOORING SO THAT NO COPPER PIPING IS VISIBLE ON BUILDING EXTERIOR. WITHIN LANDSCAPE AREA INSTALL ONE 3/4" MANUAL DRAIN VALVE, ONE 1" GATE VALVE, ONE QUICK COUPLING VALVE, ONE 1" MASTER VALVE AND EXTEND SCHEDULE 40 PVC MAINLINE AS SHOWN. WORK SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL CODE. FEES AND PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH WORK ARE TO BE OBTAINED AND PAID BY CONTRACTOR. FINAL LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO START OF WORK. WALL MOUNT ONE HUNTER PRO-C SERIES 4 STATION CONTROLLER AT INDICATED LOCATION. 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL POWER IS AVAILABLE WITHIN 20 L.F. OF CONTROLLER LOCATION. ELECTRICAL POWER AND CONNECTION TO CONTROLLER IS BY CONTRACTOR WITH WORK CONFORMING TO LOCAL CODE. FEES AND PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH WORK ARE TO BE OBTAINED AND PAID BY CONTRACTOR. FINAL LOCATION OF CONTROLLER SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. WRF-CLIKHUNTER WIRELESS RAIN/FREEZE SENSOR 10R PEB SERIES - 1" DIA.RAIN BIRD MASTER VALVE 6 12 3 3/4" DIA.MANUAL DRAIN VALVE 8 TLCV-06-18RAIN BIRD IN-LINE DRIP TREE RING 5 SLOPE COPPER PIPING AT 1% MIN. DOWN TO DRAIN VALVE 1" PVC IRRIG. WIRE CONDUIT RAIN/FREEZE SENSOR - MOUNT AT TOP OF WALL 18" DEPTH 3/4" K COPPER PIPING AT 18" MIN. MIN. DEPTH 5 SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 DZ DZ 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 5856 S LOWELL BLVD, UNIT32 #260 LITTLETON, CO 80123 303.883.3278 of 12 CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY PRESSURE AT BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATION FOR EACH TAP PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING ANY IRRIGATION INSTALLATION AND NOTIFY CONSULTANT OF ANY DIFFERENCES FROM STATED PRESSURE. IF CONTRACTOR FAILS TO NOTIFY CONSULTANT HE ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY SYSTEM ALTERATIONS. SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED FOR A STATIC PRESSURE OF 80-90 PSI (PER DENVER WATER). REFER TO IRRIGATION TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION LAY-OUT REQUIREMENTS, COORDINATION AND PRIORITIES. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE LOCATED 36" MINIMUM FROM CENTERLINE OF ALL SWALES, 24" MINIMUM FROM EDGES OF ALL WALKS, CURBS, DRIVES AND OTHER HARD SURFACE AREAS. SEPARATE SLEEVE. IRRIGATION WIRE BUNDLE SHALL BE ROUTED IN SEPARATE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OF REPLACE ANY EXISTING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT, TURF, PLANT MATERIAL OR SITE FEATURES DAMAGED DURING NEW INSTALLATION. REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR OF DAMAGED EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE OWNER AND THE CONSULTANT. REFER TO PLANTING PLAN FOR EXACT TREE LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES, TREES SHOWN ON IRRIGATION PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF SLEEVING WITH INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE FLATWORK AND PAVING. ALL SLEEVING IS BY CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON IRRIGATION PLANS INSTALL SLEEVING BASED ON SLEEVE SIZING GUIDE BELOW: NOTE: EACH LENGTH OF SLEEVED PIPE SHOWN SHALL BE ROUTED THROUGH SLEEVE/CONDUIT WITHOUT IRRIGATION PIPING PIPE SIZE OR WIRE QUANTITY TAP LOCATION/NUMBER 8. 7. 5. 6. 4. 1-25 CONTROL WIRES 3/4" - 1" PIPING 1 1-2" PVC SLEEVE 55 PSIREQUIRED PRESSURE REQUIRED SLEEVE 1-2" PVC SLEEVE REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION PROCEDURES. ALL BASE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM DRAWINGS PREPARED BY SEVEN 29 DESIGN. 1. 3. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO WINTERIZE THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN THE FALL OF THE YEAR IN WHICH THE IRRIGATION & LANDSCAPE WAS ACCEPTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PERFORM SYSTEM START-UP IN APRIL OF THE FOLLOWING SPRING. ALL IRRIGATION WIRE SHALL BE #14 AWG UFUL WIRE WITH SINGLE, SOLID COPPER CONDUCTOR AND POLYETHYLENE INSULATION (MULTI-CONDUCTOR WIRE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE). WIRE COLORS SHALL BE: CONTROL WIRES - RED, COMMON WIRE - WHITE, SPARE WIRES - BLACK, MASTER VALVE - BLUE. WATERTIGHT WIRE SPLICES SHALL BE MADE WITH 3M CO. DBR/Y-6 SPLICE KITS. 10. ALL VALVE BOXES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY CARSON INDUSTRIES. MODELS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: #910-10: QUICK COUPLING VALVES, DRIP LINE BLOW-OUT STUBS, GATE VALVES, DRAIN VALVES. #1220-12: DRIP VALVES ASSEMBLIES, FLOW SENSOR, MASTER VALVE BOXES AND LIDS SHALL BE GREEN. CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY ALL WORK (MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND WORKMANSHIP) FOR A ONE YEAR PERIOD FOLLOWING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION BY OWNER. 12. 9. 11. INSTALL ASSEMBLY TO REST ON GRAVEL SUMP. CONTAIN ENTIRE ASSEMBLY WITHIN BOX. NO VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED PROVIDE 2" MIN. CLEARANCE BETWEEN TOP OF FILTER AND BOTTOM OF BOX LID TOP OF VALVE BOX TO BE FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE NOTE: STAINLESS STEEL WORM GEAR CLAMP & 1" INSxMIPT ADAPTER RAIN BIRD 1" PEB CONTROL VALVE 1" POLYETHYLENE DRIP SUPPLY PIPING TO FIRST TEE LOCATION RAIN BIRD 1" PRB100 BASKET FILTER W/ 200 MESH SCREEN VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON DRIP TUBING/PIPING DUCTILE IRON, GASKETED FITTING - REFER SERVICE TEE - SOLVENT WELD PVC OR 1" SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE - LENGTH AS 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP - FILL BOX TO CONTROL WIRE BUNDLE REQUIRED TO SPECIFICATIONS CENTER BOX OVER ASSEMBLY AND COMMON WIRING WITHIN VALVE BOX (RE: SPECS.) PROVIDE 12" CONTINUOUS COILS OF ALL SPARE CONTROL & STATION NUMBER. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. BRAND BOX LID WITH CONTROLLER FINISH GRADE 1" SCH. 40 PVC BALL VALVE (FxF) W/ TWO 1"x2" SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLES BOTTOM OF ASSEMBLY (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL) PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGSAPPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO 1" SCH. 40 FxF COUPLING AND INSERTxMIPT ADAPTER ADAPTER OUTSIDE OF VALVE BOX. LENGTH IN BOX TO EXTEND HOSE 3/4" DRIP TUBING - COIL SUFFICIENT 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP (1 CU. FT.) WITH CAP COMPRESSION (OR INSERT) FITTING TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS."DB" INTO VALVE BOX LID. REFER 10" ROUND VALVE BOX - BRAND FINISH GRADE INDICATOR AND SWING PIPE 6" HUNTER ECO-ID OPERATIONAL COMPRESSION-TYPE OR INSERT TEE (W/ CLAMPS) DEFLECT TUBING TO PERMIT ENTRY THROUGH THROUGH BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX. PLAN POLY DRIP TUBING - FROM VALVE INSERT FITTING WITH S.S. CLAMPS (TWO CLAMPS DRIPPERLINE WITH IN-LINE 0.6 GPH EMITTERSAT 18" O.C. (NETAFIM TLCV-06-18) - INSTALL 12-18 " PER JOINT) ON SOIL SURFACE STAKED AT 48" INTERVALS EDGE OF ROOTBALL RAIN BIRD XQ POLY MICRO-TUBING (5 FT. MAX. LENGTH) RAIN BIRD XB SERIES DRIP EMITTER - REFER TO CHART PER TREE 1 1/2" CALIPER TREE 2" CALIPER TREE 2 1/2" CALIPER TREE 6 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE 8 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE 1.0 GPH 1.0 GPH 1.0 GPH 1.0 GPH 1.0 GPH FOUR EACH SIX EACH SIX EACH FOUR EACH THREE EACH EMITTER - ALL EMITTERS TO CONTACT -REFER TO NOTES FOR PLAN MULCH - RE: LANDSCAPE PLANTING BACKFILL MATERIAL EMITTER QUANTITY AND MODEL # PLANT ROOTBALL TUBING ANCHOR STAKE @ 7 FT. INTERVALS POLY DRIP TUBING WEED BARRIER FABRIC - WHERE PLANT MATERIAL EMITTER ROOTBALL NOTE: SECTION IF PLANTING ON A 4:1 SLOPE OR GREATER, INSTALL EMITTERS ON UPHILL FLUSH ALL LINES THOROUGHLY PRIOR TO EMITTER INSTALLATION. INSTALL EMITTERS ON OPPOSING SIDES OF ROOTBALL. SIDE OF ROOTBALL. INSTALL TWO 1/2 GPH EMITTERS PER 5 GAL. SHRUB, ONE 1/2 GPH EMITTER PER 1 GAL. PLANT APPLICABLE 1/4" BARBED TEE (RAIN BIRD XBF3TEE OR EQUAL) MICRO-TUBE STAKE (RAIN BIRD TS-025) 1/4" POLYETHYLENE MICRO-TUBING 1/4" MICRO-TUBING 1/4" TUBING STAKE ASSEMBLY. NOTE: CENTER BOX OVER VALVE BOTTOM OF VALVE AND PIPING 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP - ADD TO RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH EXTENSION - BRAND "MV" INTO VALVE BOX LID. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. DIAMETERFOR MANUFACTURER, MODEL # AND REFER TO EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ELECTRIC MASTER CONTROL VALVE FINISH GRADE PRESSURE MAINLINE SLIPxMIPT SCH. 40 PVC ADAPTER (2) #14 AWG UFUL WIRES (MASTER VALVE SOLENOID) - ONE BLUE, ONE GREEN - EXTEND TO CONTROLLER - (RE: IRRIG. 36" COIL #14 AWG UFUL WIRING (SPAREMASTER VALVE WIRE) - BROWN. (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL)PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGS APPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO WATERPROOF WIRE SPLICE KIT - RE: SPECS VALVE BOX. REFER TO BRAND "GV" ON LID OF 3" GATE VALVE W/ CROSS HANDLE PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE PRESSURE MAINLINE AND CONTACT TOP OF BOTTOM TO BE NOTCHED 6" CLASS 160 PVC SLEEVE 10" ROUND VALVE BOX SCH. 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER (2) - SIZE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. FINISH GRADE TO EQUAL GATE VALVE DIAMETER 2" OF 6" PVC ACCESS SLEEVEFILL BOX TO WITHIN 2" OF TOP 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP - UNDISTURBED SOIL AND SOLID WEDGE DISC (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL)PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGS APPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO IRRIGATION DETAILS 6 6 SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 DZ DZ 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 5856 S LOWELL BLVD, UNIT32 #260 LITTLETON, CO 80123 303.883.3278 of 12 IRRIGATION DETAILS 7 1" BRASS NIPPLE LENGTH AS REQUIRED 3" OF BOTTOM OF QCV LID SPECIFICATIONS. LID. REFER TO TECHNICAL BRAND "QC" INTO VALVE BOX 10" ROUND VALVE BOX QUICK COUPLING VALVE SUMP - FILL BOX TO WITHIN 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK FINISH GRADE 3 3" SOLVENT WELD OR GASKETED FITTINGREFER TO SPECIFICATIONS PRESSURE MAINLINE SERVICE TEE - 1-1"x3" SCH.80 PVC NIPPLE 1" SCH.80 PVC FIPxFIP 90 ELL 1"x12" SCH.80 PVC NIPPLE 1" BRASS FIPxFIP 90 ELL 1" SCH.80 PVC FIPxFIP 1-1x3" SCH.80 PVC NIPPLE 90 ELL (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL)PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGS APPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE SEE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP 3/4"x4" PVC NIPPLE SCH. 80 3/4" MxF SCH.40 PVC 90 ELL SOIL BLANKET COVERING SUMP 3/4" BRASS BALL CURB VALVE W/ SLOT-TYPE OPERATOR FOR SUMP SIZE 4" FINISH GRADE 3/4"x6" BRASS NIPPLE - LENGTH AS REQUIRED 3/4"xCL PVC NIPPLE SCH. 80 (2)3/4" FxF SCH.80 PVC 90 ELL (2) 2" CL200 PVC ACCESS SLEEVE - 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONSTHE LETTER "D" IN LID- REFER TO 10" ROUND VALVE BOX - BRAND LENGTH AS REQUIRED 1 CU. FT. 2" VALVE MARKER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE OF MAIN PIPING (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL)PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGS APPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO A.Y. McDONALD 76101 SERIES TOP OF SENSOR TO BE ABOVE GUTTER WITHIN CONTROLLER PEDESTALNOTE: MOUNT RAIN SENSOR RECEIVER SECURE BRACKET VIA WOOD SCREWS OR SIMILAR HUNTER ADJUSTABLE LENGTH MOUNTING HUNTER WIRELESS RAIN/FREEZE-CLIK - BUILDING EAVE, FENCE POST, ETC. AND/OR ANY OBSTRUCTIONS ARM FINAL LOCATION OF SENSOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2" TYPE "L" RIGID COPPER TUBING SECURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY FASTEN TUBING TO FINISH FLOOR @ 18" 0.C. AND COPPER TUBING TO WALL VIA UNI-STRUT CHANNEL AND COPPER FASTENERS AT 6 FT. O.C. DISCHARGE BACKFLOW PREVENTER DRAIN INTO FINISH FLOOR FLOOR DRAIN FEBCO 860 REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW TYPE "K" RIGID COPPER TO SOFT AREA 3/4" I.P. MALE BRASS BOILER DRAIN PREVENTER FLOW FEBCO 601 AIR GAP DRAIN W/ WHEEL HANDLE CxCxF TEE CxM ADAPTER - LINE SIZE WATER METER UPSTREAM OF ANY PRESSURE COLD WATER SERVICE LINE DOWNSTREAM OF TYPE "K" RIGID COPPER - CONNECT TO BUILDING REDUCING VALVES OR OTHER BUILDING SERVICE EQUIPMENT 12" MIN. 18" BACKFILL MATERIAL (TYPICAL) CONTROL WIRES PVC MAINLINE FINISH GRADE REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND FOUNDATION COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF CONDUIT WITH CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOR 18" FINISH GRADE ELECTRIC CONTROLLER SECURE CONDUIT TO INTERIOR WALL @ SECURE CONTROLLER TO WALL WITH ANCHOR BOLTS 60" MAX.54" MIN. PVC CONDUIT W/ SWEEP ELL (TYP. UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS) RING EMT MALE ADAPTER W/ WASHER & LOCK EMT CONDUIT - SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE CONTROL WIRE QUANTITY 24" 0.C. FINISH FLOOR EMT MALE ADAPTER & PVC FEMALE ADAPTER 18" MIN. J-BOX (120 VOLT ELECTRICAL) 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL CONDUIT 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL WIRING SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH IRRIGATION WIRE CONDUIT CONDUIT(S) SHALL BE CONTINUOUS. IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRE CONDUIT(S) SHALL TERMINATE WITHIN LANDSCAPE AREA. NOTES: 7 TRASH CONTAINER (BY OWNER) SL O P E 1 / 8 " P E R F T . 8"11' - 4"8" 8" 9' - 4 " 8" 1' - 0 " 10 ' - 8 " 0" +1" 6" DIAMETER X 4' HIGH CONCRETE-FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. (TYP. OF 5) 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE WITH #4S AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE APRON WITH #4S AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES TO BE 1 1/2" STEEL DECKING WELDED TO 1 3/4" X 1 3/4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. PAINT, EPT-1 1' - 6"1' - 6"4' - 2"4' - 2" 3"3" 2"4" 4" X 4" X 1/4" STEEL POST EMBEDDED 2'-0" MIN. IN TO CONCRETE FOOTING. WELD PLATE ON TOP, MAKE WATER-TIGHT AND PAINT EPT-1 CMU WITH CONCAVE TOOLED JOINTS 8 7 1' - 4"10' - 0"1' - 4" 12' - 8" 4"2"9' - 0" APPLIED STONE-LOOK FINISH OVER CMU STRUCTURE. APPLIED STONE LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 6' - 8 " 4" 7' - 0 " 6" DIAMETER X 4' HIGH CONCRETE-FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. (TYP. OF 5) TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES TO BE 1 1/2" STEEL DECKING WELDED TO 1 3/4" X 1 3/4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. PAINT EPT-1. 4" X 4" X 1/4" STEEL POST EMBEDDED 2'-0" MIN. IN TO CONCRETE FOOTING. WELD PLATE ON TOP, MAKE WATER-TIGHT AND PAINT EPT-1. 6' - 6 " 12' - 8" NOTE: PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL 1/2" DIA x 24" CANE BOLT 1 1/4" GATE PULLS HASP LOCK HORIZONTAL REINFORCING 8" CMU WITH STEEL REINFORCING AND GROUT NOTE: GROUT SOLID ALL MASONRY COURSES BELOW GRADE APPLY 2 COATS OF WATERPROOFING COATING TO ALL EXPOSED CMU AND CMU GROUT JOINTS 4X NOM. SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 8" KNOCK-OUT, REINFORCED BOND BEAM 4" CONCRETE FOUNDATION & REINFORCING, RE: STRUCTURAL 7' - 0 " CONCRETE SLAB. RE: CIVIL APPLIED STONE-LOOK FINISH OVER CMU STRUCTURE. WELD HINGE TO POST AND GATE EMBED STEEL POST IN CONCRETE FOUNDATION 2' DEPTH MIN. 2"4" 3 5 / 8 " VERTICAL REINFORCING PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS GROUT CELLS SOLID GATE ASSEMBLY AS IDENTIFIED ALIGN AL I G N 6" DIAMETER CONCRETE- FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. 7'- 0 " APPLIED STONE LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 6'- 8 " 4" 10' - 8" 4 8 7'- 0 " APPLIED STONE LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 4 8 6'- 8 " 4" 12' - 8" 4' - 0 " 3' - 6 " 2' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 6" DIA. PAINTED STEEL PIPE x 6'-0" FILL w/ CONCRETE AND MOUND TOP 2 -10" #5 BARS WELDED TO SIDE OF PIPE 16" DIA x 3'-6" DEEP CONCRETE BASE COAT ALL EXPOSED STEEL w/ ASPHALTIC PAINT PRIOR TO SETTING IN CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPE. TYPICAL 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED CROSS STRIPES AT 24" O.C. UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL. PAINT WITH 4" WIDE STRIPING 11' - 0" 5' - 0" 13'-0" PRE-CAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP RESERVED PARKING ACCESSIBLE VAN FINISH GRADE CONCRETE FOOTING WHITE LETTERING WHITE BORDER, SYMBOL AND LETTERING BLUE FIELD COLOR NO. 15090 IN FEDERAL STANDARD 599B REFLECTORIZED SIGN CONSTRUCTED OF PORCELAIN STEEL WITH BEADED TEXT OR EQUAL 2" DIA GALVANIZED PIPE SET IN CONCRETE 18" BELOW GRADE BLUE FIELD COLOR NO. 15090 IN FEDERAL STANDARD 599B 12" 6 " 2 " 1 ' - 6 " 6 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6 " 12" CLEARANCE _'-_" PAYSTATION KIOSK BEHIND, BY OWNER CLEARANCE BAR POST, PAINT WHITE CLEARANCE SIGN, BY OWNER. HANGING CHAIN TOP RAIL, PAINT WHITE LIGHT FIXTURE AND LIGHT POLE RAISED CONCRETE ISLAND RE : E L E C T R I C A L 3' - 0 " 10 8 " LIGHTPOLE PAYSTATION 10 8 " CLEARANCE SIGN PLACED INTO CONCRETE WITH BASE AT FINISHED FLOOR 6" AMP NOTE: COORDINATE SET BOLTS AND CONDUITS WITH CARWASH EQUIPMENT VENDOR & OWNER BEFORE ISLAND INFILL CONCRETE IS POURED. ** MOUNTING SURFACE MUST BE FLAT AND LEVEL PAYSTATION KIOSK, BY OWNER 36 " CLEARANCE SIGN 24"18" PAYSTATION MOUNTING SURFACE TO BE FLAT AND LEVEL LIGHT FIXTURE ANCHOR PLATE 16 " 2" AMP BASE 6" CONCRETE BASE, RE: STRUCTURAL SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 3 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 2 8 : 5 7 P M As indicated SITE DETAILS 2202.58 8 3/11/2024 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1/4" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN - CMU1 1/4" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION - CMU2 3/8" = 1'-0"8 ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION4 1 1/2" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE DETAIL - CMU5 1/4" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION - CMU3 1/4" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION - CMU6 1/2" = 1'-0"8 PIPE BOLLARD7 1/2" = 1'-0"8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN8 1/8" = 1'-0"8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL - WIDE9 3/8" = 1'-0"8 DTL-AUTOPAY ELEVATION-APPROACH11 3/8" = 1'-0"8 DTL-AUTOPAY ELEVATION-FRONT12 3/8" = 1'-0"8 DTL-AUTOPAY PLAN13 FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 05.315 09.610 04.411 08.132 05.872 05.410 05.311 09.620 08.211 10.122 4' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 8 " 10 ' - 0 " 10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0" 81'-4" 32'-0"17'-4"32'-0" TYP. 3'-0" OVERHANG FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 8' - 8 " 8' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 04.411 05.315 09.610 05.872 05.410 08.132 08.211 09.62005.311 10 ' - 0 " 32'-0"17'-4"32'-0" 81'-4" TYP. 3'-0" OVERHANG FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 8' - 8 " 8' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 04.411 05.315 05.872 10.122 05.410 19'-7"40'-8"27'-9" 08.212 14'-0"14'-0" TYP. 3'-0" OVERHANG 05.801 09.61009.620 8' - 0 " 88'-0" BUILD-TO FRONTAGE FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 05.311 05.311 04.411 05.315 09.610 05.872 09.620 05.410 8' - 8 " 8' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 54'-0" 4'-0"40'-8"9'-4" 05.801 SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 3 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 2 9 : 0 3 P M 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING ELEVATIONS 2202.58 9 3/11/2024 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1/8" = 1'-0"9 NORTH ELEVATION1 1/8" = 1'-0"9 SOUTH ELEVATION4 1/8" = 1'-0"9 EAST ELEVATION2 1/8" = 1'-0"9 WEST ELEVATION3 KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 04.411 FAUX BRICK PANEL, RUNNING BOND, BR-1 05.311 VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-1 05.315 HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 05.410 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING OVER PARAPET WALL 05.801 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN WALL, RE: SITE DETAILS. 05.872 AWNING, WITH METAL PANEL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 08.132 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM / POLYCARBONATE SECTIONAL ROLL-UP DOOR. 08.211 EXTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM WITH 1" POLYCARBONATE PANEL, SF-1 08.212 EXTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM WITH SPANDREL PANEL, SF-2. 09.610 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 09.620 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-2 10.122 BUILDING SIGNAGE, UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT. EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION MFR MODEL/COLOR REMARKS MISC SF-1 STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY KAWNEER 451T, TERRA COTTA WITH POLYCARBONATE GLAZING SF-2 VENEER STOREFRONT WITH SPANDREL GLAZING KAWNEER & VIRACON 450 (2.25" DEPTH & 2" SIGHTLINE) / TERRA COTTA, V957 "SUBDUED GRAY" W/ SPANDREL PANEL ROOF MR-1 METAL ROOF PANEL METAL SALES PBR, TERRA COTTA METAL ROOFING AND AWNINGS WALL EPT-1 PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS TO MATCH MR-1 TERRA COTTA MP-1 ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL SALES T-10 A, METALLIC SILVER VERTICAL ORIENTATION MP-2 ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL SALES TLC-1, REGAL BLUE HORIZONTAL ORIENTATION MTL-1 METAL SCREEN WALL H&H METALS CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAME AND MESH SCREEN PANELS ST-1 PANELIZED STUCCO FINISH URESTONE STUCCO CLAD, HALF PATTERN, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7066 GRAY MATTERS ST-2 PANELIZED STUCCO FINISH URESTONE STUCCO CLAD, HALF PATTERN, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6524 COMMODORE STN-1 URESTONE LEDGESTONE URESTONE LEDGESTONE WAINSCOT, CASCADE CANYON FINISH WAINSCOT AT MAIN BODY BUILDING MATERIALS SUMMARY GROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY NORTH ELEVATION 40% MIN (32.6 LF) 49.1% (40 LF) REQUIRED PROPOSED REQUIRED PROPOSED SECONDARY MATERIAL (METAL PANEL) NORTH ELEVATION 40% MAX 24.3% (442 SF) EAST ELEVATION 40% MAX 38.1% (328 SF) SOUTH ELEVATION 40% MAX 24.3% (442 SF) WEST ELEVATION 40% MAX 38.1% (328 SF) EAST ELEVATION 25% MIN (10.3 LF) 68.3% (28 LF) M TRANS X X X X X X X X X X WEST 44TH AVENUE GR A Y S T R E E T PROPOSED BUILDING PB PB AA AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB CC CC DDDD AA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.3 2.1 2.0 2.3 3.2 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.8 3.2 2.8 3.0 3.5 3.0 2.3 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.6 2.7 2.4 2.9 4.0 3.7 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.7 3.3 3.8 3.3 3.7 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.3 2.9 3.6 4.8 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.4 4.1 4.5 4.1 4.5 4.8 3.7 3.3 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.2 3.6 3.6 4.6 5.6 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.4 5.3 5.2 5.0 5.5 5.3 4.1 3.5 2.9 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.6 1.4 3.1 4.1 3.5 4.3 5.7 6.4 5.3 5.5 5.3 5.2 5.4 6.4 6.1 6.0 6.8 6.0 4.5 3.8 3.3 2.5 1.9 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.8 1.9 3.8 4.8 4.1 3.8 6.7 7.4 6.3 6.3 5.8 4.4 4.0 7.1 5.9 5.5 7.8 6.9 5.4 4.6 3.8 2.8 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.6 2.2 3.1 4.5 5.3 5.5 6.1 7.5 8.7 7.9 7.7 5.8 5.2 5.3 7.0 8.1 8.1 8.8 8.1 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.1 2.2 1.6 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.1 1.8 2.6 3.5 4.9 6.3 6.7 7.4 8.4 9.6 8.9 7.9 7.3 7.7 8.9 9.5 8.1 6.5 5.2 3.5 2.4 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.0 2.9 4.0 5.5 7.6 7.7 8.6 9.3 9.7 9.4 9.0 8.8 9.1 9.4 9.6 9.6 7.5 6.2 4.0 2.6 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.0 2.9 3.9 5.1 6.0 3.2 3.5 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.1 2.9 4.1 5.5 6.2 3.1 2.8 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.1 2.9 4.0 5.7 5.0 2.7 2.0 1.8 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.1 2.9 4.1 6.4 5.7 3.5 2.3 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.1 2.9 4.1 6.0 5.7 3.7 2.4 1.4 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.2 2.1 2.9 4.0 5.4 5.4 3.2 2.3 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.2 2.0 2.8 3.8 5.1 5.6 3.6 2.3 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.3 3.4 4.7 6.3 4.5 2.9 1.9 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.4 2.5 3.9 5.5 7.2 8.1 7.6 8.6 8.3 7.6 6.7 5.2 5.6 6.2 5.9 6.2 5.9 4.1 3.5 2.1 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.2 2.1 3.1 4.4 6.1 6.5 6.1 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.3 5.8 4.6 3.4 3.4 5.0 5.8 5.7 5.0 4.5 4.0 2.9 2.3 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.5 3.5 4.2 4.3 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.0 4.2 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.5 3.1 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.5 2.1 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PB PB SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 2202.58 11.15.2023 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO AS NOTED JCB JCB 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 10 1" = 10'-0"10 OF 12 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 N Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Lum. Watts Lum. Lumens LLF Catalog 2 CC 25.4 3462 1.000 Calculation Summary Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Site Fc 1.46 9.7 0.0 N.A.N.A. M.H. 10'-0"COOPER - ISW-AF-1000-LED-E1-T4FT 4 AA 34.0 4880 COOPER - GLEON-SA1A-750-U-T4FT18'-0"1.000 COLOR BLACK BLACK 22 BB 21.3 1187 COOPER - LD6B10D010 EU6B10208040 6LBSLI112'-0"1.000 BLACK 2 DD BY CITY CITY PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT NOT IN CALC. GRADE 36" 15'-0" POLE LIGHT ELEVATION 'AA' PB 2 PB BY CITY CITY PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT PULL BOX SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 2202.58 11.15.2023 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO AS NOTED JCB JCB 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com LIGHTING DETAILS 11 11 OF12 FIXTURE AA: GLEON-SA1B-740-U-T4FT1 FIXTURE BB: LD6B10D010 EU6B10208040 6LBSLI12 3 FIXTURE CC: ISW-AF-1000-LED-E1-T4FT11 OF12 11 OF12 FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 3 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 2 9 : 2 5 P M 1/8" = 1'-0" COLOR ELEVATIONS 2202.58 12 3/11/2024 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1/8" = 1'-0"12 NORTH ELEVATION1 1/8" = 1'-0"12 EAST ELEVATION2 1/8" = 1'-0"12 SOUTH ELEVATION4 1/8" = 1'-0"12 WEST ELEVATION3 Attachment 3 SUP Application Submittals 385 Inverness Parkway, Suite 190 • Englewood, CO 80112 Page 1 of 2 Voice: 720.773.2800 385 INVERNESS PARKWAY, SUITE 190 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 PROJECT NARRATIVE DATE: 2/10/2023 NAME: Autowash Lakeside SECTION 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION CLIENT INFORMATION: Name: Mark Brazee on behalf of Dennis Dreeszen Address: 383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 1175, Englewood, CO 80122 Phone Number: (720) 534-3013 Email Address: mbbrazee@hoverarchitecture.com Company Name: Hover Architecture SITE LOCATION: Address: 5900 W 44th Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80212 County: Jefferson County Subdivision: Stevenson Block, Lot: Lot 0002 Parcel #: 39-244-08-002 Lot Size: 0.45 Acres (19,602 SF) PROJECT NARRATIVE: Hover Architecture is pleased to present a new Autowash Project at 5900 W 44th Ave in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. This project includes the demolition of a current self-service car wash to make way for a new automatic car wash with four wash bays. Vehicles will enter from West 44th Avenue and travel around the west side of the building to access the 5 vacuum stations, including one accessible parking space, or proceed to the south of the building to access the pay stations and wash bays. Stacking is available for 8 vehicles, 2 per lane wash bay, on the south side of the building. Once through the car wash, customers will exit the lot back onto West 44th Avenue. An exit only lane allows vehicles, including sanitation and emergency vehicles, to exit the property onto Gray Street. The landscaping will include deciduous and evergreen trees, deciduous, evergreen, and broadleaf evergreen shrubs, and ornamental grasses. Most of the landscaping will be planted along the perimeter of the property, with additional plantings at the north and south end of the row of vacuum/parking stalls on the west side of the site and few additional plants adjacent to the trash enclosure between the wash bay stacking lanes near the south side of the property. The landscaping plan, notes and details are shown on sheets 3 and 4. 385 Inverness Parkway, Suite 190 • Englewood, CO 80112 Page 2 of 2 Voice: 720.773.2800 The proposed building will be 3,539 square feet, 30-feet tall, and consist of four automatic wash bays, 2 on each side of an equipment room. It will be a concrete cast-in-place structure and finished in brick wall panels, exterior insulation finish system, metal wall panels and a metal screen wall. Materials and their location on the building are shown on the Building Elevation Sheets 6 and 9. The metal screen wall and the building are 60% of the street frontage along Gray Street. Site details, including trash enclosure details, are located on sheet 5. Lighting on the property will only occur on the building and at the pay stations to south of the building. No lighting is proposed along the west and south property lines, adjacent to the commercial and residential structures. The Photometric Plan and lighting details are on sheets 7 and 8. PROJECT VICINITY MAP: Google Maps URL: 5900 W 44th Ave - Google Maps 385 Inverness Parkway, Suite 190, Englewood, CO 80112 Page 1 of 2 Voice: (720) 773-2800 383 INVERNESS PARKWAY, SUITE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 February 13, 2023 Alayna Olivas-Loera Wheat Ridge Community Development 303-235-2852 Special Use Permit Review Criteria RE: Autowash Lakeside 5900 W. 44th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO. Response: The proposed new car wash replaces an existing car wash. It will not have a detrimental effect on the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Response: The proposed new car wash will not create or contribute to blight in the neighborhood by virtue of physical or operational characteristics. Response: The proposed new car wash will not create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing zoning of the property. 385 Inverness Parkway, Suite 190, Englewood, CO 80112 Page 2 of 2 Voice: (720) 773-2800 Response: The proposed new car wash will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parling, loading, service or internal conflicts to the determent of persons on or off the site. Response: The proposed new car wash is appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening, and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. Response: The proposed new car wash will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. Response: The property was recently purchased, therefore; the property owner does not have a history of compliance with Code requirements and prior conditions regarding the subject property. Response: The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. Response: The proposed new car wash promotes goals and outcomes from applicable portions of the City’s comprehensive plan and any subarea plan applicable to the property. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions or concerns regarding these issues. Sincerely, Mark Brazee Project Architect PROJECT SITE SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 2/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 1 0 : 3 9 : 5 2 A M 1/4" = 1'-0" COVER SHEET 2202.58 1 02.07.2023 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO VICINITY MAP N OWNER'S CERTIFICATE The below signed owner(s), or legally designated agent(s) thereof, do hereby agree that the property legally described hereon will be developed in accordance with the restrictions and conditions contained in this plan, and as may otherwise be required by law. I (we) further recognize that the approval of this Site Plan does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. ____________________________ [Insert name of owner(s) or agent(s) who will sign] State of Colorado ) ) SS County of Jefferson ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____day of_______, A.D. 20____ by_______________________. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ________________________ Notary Public SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, _________________________ do hereby certify that the survey of the boundary of _________________________ was made by me or under my direct supervision and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, in accordance with all applicable Colorado statutes, current revised edition as amended, the accompanying plan accurately represents said survey. (Surveyor's Seal)________________________ Signature COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE State of Colorado ) ) SS County of Jefferson ) I hereby certify that this plan was filed in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Jefferson County at Golden, Colorado, at ________o'clock___.M. on the _____ day of ______________, ________ A.D., in Book______, Page______, Reception No. __________. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER By: ________________________ Deputy CITY CERTIFICATION Approved this ______ day of ____________________, ________ by the City of Wheat Ridge. ATTEST _______________________________ Community Development Director PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION Approved this ______ day of ____________________, ________ by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission. _______________________________ Chairperson LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 2 AND 4, STEVENSON SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME 1 COVER SHEET 2 SITE PLAN 3 LANDSCAPE PLAN 4 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 5 SITE DETAILS 6 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 7 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 8 LIGHTING DETAILS 9 COLOR ELEVATIONS CHARACTER OF PROPOSAL APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DEMOLISH THE CURRENT CARWASH AND CONSTRUCT A FOUR-BAY AUTOMATED CARWASH WITH AN EQUIPMENT ROOM. ACCESS IS PROPOSED OFF OF W. 44TH AVENUE WITH CAR QUEUING ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF THE SITE. SITE DATA TABLE SITE ADDRESS 5900 W 44TH AVE EXISTING ZONING COMMERCIAL-ONE (C-1) PROPOSED LAND USE CAR WASH SITE AREA ±19,238 SF (0.442 AC) BUILDING AREA ±3,539 SF (18.4% COVERAGE) [UTILITY/EQPMT] ±936 SF [CAR WASH BAYS] ±2,603 SF REQUIRED PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE 80% MAX 18.4% (3,539 SF) OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPE 20% (3,848 SF) 20.3% (3,906 SF) SOD 30% MAX - PARKING STANDARD - 4 ACCESSIBLE 1 1 BICYCLE - - CASE HISTORY - REQUIRED PROPOSED BUILDING FRONTAGE GRAY STREET 60% (89.35 LF) 63.1% (94 LF) SS ST M X X X X X X X X X X W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW GAS GASGASGASGAS GAS GASGASGAS GAS GASGAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSS SS SS SS OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE OHE WWWWWW ST ST ST ST STSTST W ST ST OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE T E E FIRE FIRE GAS GASGAS HW HW OHE OHE SS SSSS ST STST T T W WW X X WEST 44TH AVENUE GR A Y S T R E E T PROPOSED CAR WASH BUILDING 3,539 SF N89°54'08"E 116.05' S89°54'08"W 131.00' N0 0 ° 1 7 ' 3 2 " W 1 5 4 . 9 3 ' N0 0 ° 1 7 ' 3 2 " W 1 3 9 . 9 8 ' L=23.51' R=1 5 . 0 0 ' LOT 1 & 3 #5990 WEST 44TH AVE. 1-STORY BLOCK BUILDING LOT 6 #4355 GRAY STREET 38 ' - 6 " R.O.W. 6' - 0 " A D D I T I O N A L 54' - 0" 46'-10"81'-4" 1'-4"R.O.W. 1'-6" ADDITIONAL 4'-2"16'-0"19'-6"7'-2" 5'-0" 11'-0" 13'-0" TYP. 6' - 1 " SIDEWALK 8' - 0 " BUFFER 2' - 6 " 56 ' - 5 " 14'-0" 12'-11"15'-8"17'-8"15'-5"13'-1" 46'-6" 7'-6" 10'-8" 8'-10" 10'-0" 30'-0" 20'-8" 16'-0" LOT 2 & 4 #5900 WEST 44TH AVE 3'-7" SIDEWALK 5'-6" 14 8 ' - 1 1 " 43.109 32.911 32.600 03.150 43.105 43.106 32.800 43.110 1 4 EQ U I P M E N T RO O M AU T O M A T I C BA Y 1 AU T O M A T I C BA Y 2 AU T O M A T I C BA Y 3 AU T O M A T I C BA Y 4 5' - 1 " 02.106 32.900 32.22032.220 32.21032.210 03.140 03.140 OF ROW 25'-0" TO CL OF ROW 30 ' - 0 " T O C L 32.700 32.22032.220 32.22032.220 94 ' - 0 " VACUUM STANCHION WITH CANOPY PARKING SPACE CROSSWALK ADA RAMP ADA SYMBOL AUTO CASHIER ISLAND CANOPY PIPE BOLLARD WHEEL STOP TRASH ENCLOSURE SYMBOL LEGEND TRANSFORMER FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY MAN HOLE WATER METER UNDERGROUND TANK PROPERTY SITE LINE ELECTRIC LINE FIRE LINE GAS LINE HOT WATER LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE SANITARY LINE STORM LINE TELEPHONE LINE WATER LINE FENCE LINE LEGEND PROPERTY EASEMENT PROPERTY BUFFER PROPERTY SETBACK HATCH LEGEND ASPHALT CURB & GUTTER ROCK SIDEWALK BUILDING LANDSCAPE CONCRETE PAVING SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 2/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 1 0 : 3 9 : 5 4 A M As indicated SITE PLAN 2202.58 2 02.07.2023 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1" = 10'-0"2 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Copy 11 N KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 02.106 EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE TO REMAIN. 03.140 CONCRETE APRON, RE: CIVIL 03.150 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 32.210 CONCRETE PAVING, RE: CIVIL. 32.220 ASPHALT PAVING, RE: CIVIL. 32.600 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, RE: CIVIL. 32.700 MANHOLE, RE: CIVIL. 32.800 LANDSCAPE, RE: LANDSCAPE PLANS. 32.900 CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. 32.911 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL. 43.105 TRASH ENCLOSURE, REFER TO SITE DETAILS ON A1-2. 43.106 PAY STATION, REFER TO EQUIPMENT CUT SHEETS. 43.109 UNDERGROUND SAND OIL INTERCEPTOR, RE: EQUIPMENT. 43.110 VACUUM STANCHION WITH ATTACHED PRODUCER. ST W. 44TH AVE. N G R A Y S T 3 PHNA 1 QUCR 3 COCB 1 PIPB 3 MIST 3 PHNA 3 PIMS 3 PHNA 3 MIST 5 BETH 5 RHFR 5 BETH 1 PIPB 3 PIMS 5 CAKF 1 GLSK 3 COCB 3 MIGR 5 PIMS 3 RIAL 5 PIMS 1 PIPB 3 SPFT 1 ACAG 1 JUBU 2 COCB 7 CAKF 1 JUBU 1 ACAG 1 ACAG 1 JUBU 5 COCB LEGEN SMBOL ESCRIPTION ROCK MULCH ECIUOUS TREE EISTING TREE TO BE REMOE ECIUOUS SHRUBS EERGREEN SHRUBS ORNAMENTAL GRASS CONCRETE PAING BROALEAF EERGREEN SHRUBS EERGREEN TREE SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.07.2023 CM CM 33 INERNESS PK STE 175 ENGLEOO CO 112 72 7732 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 55 S LOELL BL UNIT32 2 LITTLETON CO 123 333327 25 N 1 SCALE 11 LANSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN 3 STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED OPEN SPACE 2 OF GROSS LOT AREA AREA REQUIRE AREA PROIE 3 SF 3 SF SITE ATA LOT AREA 123 SF ACRES STREET CALCULATION QT REQUIRE QT PROIE TH AENUE AMENIT ONE LESS THAN FIE FEET NA NA GRA STREET ATTACHE SIEALK NO AMENIT ONE NA NA STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT STREET CALCULATION LENGTH QT REQUIRE QT PROIE TH AENUE 1 TREE 3 LF 5 FT 1 GRA STREET 1 TREE 3 LF 11 FT NOTES 1 AUTOMATIC UNERGROUN IRRIGATION SSTEM ILL BE PROIE FOR ALL ONSITE PLANTINGS LANSCAPE AREA PLANTING REQUIREMENT ESCRIPTION CALCULATION AREA QT REQUIRE QT PROIE SITE AREA 1 TREE 1 SF 3 SF 1 SHRUBS 1 SF 3 SF 3 3 ECIUOUS TREES QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIE ACAG 3 ACER RUBRUM JFSK7 ARMSTRONG GOL MAPLE B B 2CAL GLSK 1 GLEITSIA INERMIS SKLINE SKLINE HONELOCUST B B 2CAL QUCR 1 QUERCUS CRIMSCHMIT CRIMSON SPIRE OAK B B 2CAL EERGREEN TREES QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIE PIPB 3 PICEA PUNGENS BAKERI BAKERI SPRUCE B B BROALEAF EERGREENS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT COCB 13 COTONEASTER AMMERI CORAL BEAUT CORAL BEAUT COTONEASTER 5 GAL ECIUOUS SHRUBS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT BETH 1 BERBERIS THUNBERGII ATROPURPUREA RE BARBERR 5 GAL PHNA PHSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS NANUS ARF NINEBARK 5 GAL RHFR 5 RHAMNUS FRANGULA COLUMNARIS COLUMNAR BUCKTHORN 5 GAL RIAL 3 RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT 5 GAL SPFT 3 SPIRAEA FRITSCHIANA FRITCH SPIREA 5 GAL EERGREEN SHRUBS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT JUBU 3 JUNIPERUS SABINA BUFFALO BUFFALO JUNIPER 5 GAL PIMS 1 PINUS MUGO SLOMOUN SLOMOUN MUGO PINE 5 GAL ORNAMENTAL GRASS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAKF 12 CALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFLORA KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REE GRASS 5 GAL MIGR 3 MISCANTHUS SINENSIS GRACILLIMUS MAIEN GRASS 5 GAL MIST MISCANTHUS SINENSIS STRICTUS EBRA GRASS 5 GAL PLANT SCHEULE SIE NOTES 1 ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET OR ECEE CURRENT AMERICAN STANAR FOR NURSER STOCK ANSI 1 AN THE COLORAO NURSER ACT AN ACCOMPANING RULES AN REGULATIONS NOTES 1 UE TO THE OERHEA POER LINE CONFLICT ALONG TH AENUE SHRUB QUANTIT OERAGES HAE BEEN PROIE TO MAKE UP FOR EFICIENCIES IN THE TREE REQUIREMENTS THE OERAGES PROIE INCLUE SHRUBS AN ORNAMENTAL GRASSES CALCULATE AS 1 SHRUBSORNAMENTAL GRASSES ARE EQUAL TO ONE TREE AN AITIONAL 3 SHRUBS HAE BEEN PROIE TO MEET THE TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENT SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.07.2023 CM CM 33 INERNESS PK STE 175 ENGLEOO CO 112 72 7732 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 55 S LOELL BL UNIT32 2 LITTLETON CO 123 333327 LANDSCAPE NOTES AND DETAILS 2 METAL T POST STAKES ITH PROTECTIE CAP RIE MIN 2 FIRML INTO SUBGRAE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING 2 12 GAUGE GAL GU IRES AT 3 ABOE GRAE 12 IA 1 PC PIPE ON EACH IRE PLANT SO THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS 2 ABOE FINISHE GRAE PLACE FERTILIER PER SPECS PRIOR TO MULCH APPLICATION APPL CEAR MULCH ITH A 3 IA MULCH RING HEN LOCATE IN GRASS OR SEE AREAS KEEP MULCH FROM CONTACTING TRUNK OF TREE MULCH AS SPECIFIE FORM SAUCER 3 CONT RIM CUT AN REMOE ALL TINE RAPPING AN BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF BALL ATER AN TAMP POCKETS TO REMOE AIR 3 TAMPE TOPSOIL SCARIF EISTING SOIL TO EPTH ECIUOUS TREE 12 1 2 BALL IA CUT AN REMOE ALL TINEIRE BASKET FROM ROOTBALL 3 NOTES 1 O NOT CUT LEAER PRUNE ALL AMAGE OR EA OO AFTER PLANTING STAKING MULCHING 2 KEEP CRON SHAPE TPICAL OF SPECIES 3 REMOE ALL PLANTING LABELS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE B LANSCAPE ARCHITECT REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL ESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION PROCEURES TO BE FOLLOE 32321 EERGREEN TREE PLANTING 3 1 NOTES 1 O NOT CUT LEAER PRUNE ALL AMAGE OR EA OO AFTER PLANTING STAKING AN MULCHING 2 KEEP CRON SHAPE TPICAL OF SPECIES 3 REMOE ALL PLANTING LABELS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE B LANSCAPE ARCHITECT REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL ESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION PROCEURES TO BE FOLLOE 3 12 GAUGE GAL OUBLE STRAN TISTE GU IRES AT 3 ABOE GRAE ITH 12 IA HITE PC PIPE 3 LENGTH ON EACH IRE PLANT TREE 3 ABOE NURSER GRAE SET TRUNK PLUMB APPL MULCH ITH A 3 IA MULCH RING TP KEEP MULCH FROM CONTACTING TRUNK OF TREE INSTALL A 23 HT ATER RING AT TIME OF PLANTING METAL STAKES 3 PER TREE ALIGNE EQUALL AROUN TREE BUR ANCHOR 12 UNERGROUN USE UCK BILL EARTH ANCHOR OR APPROE EQUAL BACKFILL PLANT PIT ITH AMENE SOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS ATTACH GU IRE TO 2 CANAS STRAP OR APPROE EQUI THROUGH GROMMETS UNISTURBE SOIL 2 BALL IA FULL REMOE ALL TINEIRE BASKET FROM ROOTBALL CUT AN REMOE ALL TINE RAPPING AN BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF BALL N PLAN 3 32332 SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASS PLANTING 1 12 1 PLANT SO THAT TOP OF ROOTBALL IS LEEL FINISH GRAE PLACE SPECIFIE FERTILIER PRIOR TO MULCH APPLICATION FEATHER MULCH TO BASE OF SHRUB BRANCHES FORM 3 CONTINUOUS RIM BACKFILL PLANT PIT ITH AMENE SOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS REMOE ALL CONTAINER MATERIAL PLACE OER UNISTURBE SOIL ATER AN TAMP POCKETS TO REMOE AIR UNISTURBE SOILAR ROOTBALL 12 NOTES 1 O NOT CUT LEAER PRUNE ALL AMAGE OR EA OO AFTER PLANTING STAKING MULCHING 2 KEEP CRON SHAPE TPICAL OF SPECIES 3 REMOE ALL PLANTING LABELS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE B LANSCAPE ARCHITECT REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL ESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION PROCEURES TO BE FOLLOE 3 3235 TRASH CONTAINER (BY OWNER) SL O P E 1 / 8 " P E R F T . 8" 11' - 4" 8" 8" 9' - 4 " 8" 1' - 0 " 10 ' - 8 " 0" +1" 6" DIAMETER X 4' HIGH CONCRETE-FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. (TYP. OF 5) 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE WITH #4S AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE APRON WITH #4S AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES TO BE 1 1/2" STEEL DECKING WELDED TO 1 3/4" X 1 3/4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT MASONRY 1' - 6"1' - 6"4' - 2" 4' - 2" 3"3" 2"4" 4" X 4" X 1/4" STEEL POST EMBEDDED 2'-0" MIN. IN TO CONCRETE FOOTING. WELD PLATE ON TOP, MAKE WATER-TIGHT AND PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT MASONRY CMU WITH CONCAVE TOOLED JOINTS A1-2 11 1' - 4" 10' - 0" 1' - 4" 12' - 8" 4"2"9' - 0" APPLIED BRICK-LOOK FINISH OVER CMU STRUCTURE. APPLIED BRICK LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 6' - 8 " 4" 7' - 0 " 6" DIAMETER X 4' HIGH CONCRETE-FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. (TYP. OF 5) TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES TO BE 1 1/2" STEEL DECKING WELDED TO 1 3/4" X 1 3/4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT MASONRY 4" X 4" X 1/4" STEEL POST EMBEDDED 2'-0" MIN. IN TO CONCRETE FOOTING. WELD PLATE ON TOP, MAKE WATER-TIGHT AND PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT MASONRY4" 6' - 2 " 6' - 6 " 12' - 8" NOTE: PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL 1/2" DIA x 24" CANE BOLT 1 1/4" GATE PULLS HASP LOCK HORIZONTAL REINFORCING 8" CMU WITH STEEL REINFORCING AND GROUT NOTE: GROUT SOLID ALL MASONRY COURSES BELOW GRADE APPLY 2 COATS OF WATERPROOFING COATING TO ALL EXPOSED CMU AND CMU GROUT JOINTS 4X10X16 NOM. SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 8" KNOCK-OUT, REINFORCED BOND BEAM 4" CONCRETE FOUNDATION & REINFORCING, RE: STRUCTURAL 7' - 0 " CONCRETE SLAB. RE: CIVIL WELD HINGE TO POST AND GATE EMBED STEEL POST IN CONCRETE FOUNDATION 2' DEPTH MIN. 2"4" 3 5 / 8 " VERTICAL REINFORCING PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS GROUT CELLS SOLID GATE ASSEMBLY AS IDENTIFIED ALIGN AL I G N 6" DIAMETER CONCRETE- FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. 7'- 0 " APPLIED BRICK LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 6'- 8 " 4" 10' - 8" 4 5 7'- 0 " APPLIED BRICK LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 4 5 6'- 8 " 4" 12' - 8" 7' - 6 " 2' - 6 " 1' - 0 " 6" DIA. PAINTED STEEL PIPE x 6'-0" FILL w/ CONCRETE AND MOUND TOP 2 - 10" #5 BARS WELDED TO SIDE OF PIPE 16" DIA x 3'-6" DEEP CONCRETE BASE COAT ALL EXPOSED STEEL w/ ASPHALTIC PAINT PRIOR TO SETTING IN CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPE. TYPICAL 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED CROSS STRIPES AT 24" O.C. UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL. PAINT WITH 4" WIDE STRIPING 11' - 0" 5' - 0" 13'-0" RESERVED PARKING ACCESSIBLE VAN FINISH GRADE CONCRETE FOOTING WHITE LETTERING WHITE BORDER, SYMBOL AND LETTERING BLUE FIELD COLOR NO. 15090 IN FEDERAL STANDARD 599B REFLECTORIZED SIGN CONSTRUCTED OF PORCELAIN STEEL WITH BEADED TEXT OR EQUAL 2" DIA GALVANIZED PIPE SET IN CONCRETE 18" BELOW GRADE BLUE FIELD COLOR NO. 15090 IN FEDERAL STANDARD 599B 12" 6 " 2 " 1 ' - 6 " 6 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6 " 12" 4" CONCRETE CAP MASONRY OPENING FOR AUTO CASHIER EQUIPMENT. SHIM WITH CEMENT BOARD TO 23" WIDE. CAULK PERIMETER BRICK-LOOK FINISH OVER CMU TO MATCH BUILDING AUTOCASHIER PANEL CONTROL JOINT THICKENED CONCRETE SLAB BLACK ARM AND HOUSING CLEARANCE BAR LIGHT FIXTURE AND POLE NOTE: COORDINATE OPENING FOR ACCESS AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO EQUIPMENT WITH CARWASH EQUIPMENT VENDOR. INFILL WITH CONCRETE LIGHT FIXTURE ANCHOR PLATE OPENING FOR AUTOCASHIER EQUIPMENT PLAN VIEW 2' - 8" 3' - 4" 3' - 4 " 2' - 0" 6' - 0" 3 EACH. 1" CONDUITS TO EQUIPMENT ROOM CLEARANCE BAR 8"8"2' - 0"8" FRONT ELEVATION METAL PANEL ACCENT FIN TO MATCH BUILDING PL A N RE : P H O T O M E T R I C 2' - 8 " 4" CONCRETE CAP BRICK-LOOK FINISH OVER CMU TO MATCH BUILDING CONTROL JOINT THICKENED CONCRETE SLAB CLEARANCE BARLIGHT FIXTURE AND POLE REAR ELEVATION METAL PANEL ACCENT FIN TO MATCH BUILDING 6' - 2 " METAL PANEL ACCENT FIN TO MATCH BUILDING 1' - 6" 1' - 0 " 4" CONCRETE CAP SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 2/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 1 0 : 3 9 : 5 5 A M As indicated SITE DETAILS 2202.58 5 02.07.2023 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1/4" = 1'-0"5 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN - CMU1 1/4" = 1'-0"5 TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION - CMU2 3/8" = 1'-0"5 ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION4 1 1/2" = 1'-0"5 TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE DETAIL - CMU5 1/4" = 1'-0"5 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION - CMU3 1/4" = 1'-0"5 TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION - CMU6 1/2" = 1'-0"5 PIPE BOLLARD7 1/2" = 1'-0"5 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN8 1/8" = 1'-0"5 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL - WIDE9 3/8" = 1'-0"5 AUTOPAY STATION ISLAND10 FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 05.315 07.412 04.411 08.132 05.872 05.511 05.311 07.411 08.210 10.122 4' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 8 " 10 ' - 0 " 10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0" 81'-8" 32'-0"17'-8"32'-0". FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 8' - 8 " 8' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 04.411 05.315 07.412 05.872 05.511 08.132 08.210 07.41105.311 10 ' - 0 " 32'-0".17'-8"32'-0" 81'-8" FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 8' - 8 " 8' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 04.411 05.315 05.872 10.122 05.511 8' - 0 " 05.801 8' - 0 " 94'-0". 37'-0".41'-0"16'-0". FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 05.311 05.311 04.411 05.315 07.412 05.872 07.411 05.511 8' - 8 " 8' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 05.801 54'-4" 4'-0"41'-0"9'-4" SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ m b b r a z e e \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ m b b r a z e e . r v t 2/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 3 1 : 2 5 : 2 9 P M 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING ELEVATIONS 2202.58 6 02.07.2023 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1/8" = 1'-0"6 NORTH ELEVATION1 1/8" = 1'-0"6 SOUTH ELEVATION4 1/8" = 1'-0"6 EAST ELEVATION2 1/8" = 1'-0"6 WEST ELEVATION3 KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 04.411 FAUX BRICK PANEL, RUNNING BOND, BR-1 05.311 VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-1 05.315 HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 05.511 PRE-FINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE FLASHING. 05.801 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN WALL. 05.872 STEEL AWNING, WITH METAL PANEL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 07.411 EXTERIOR INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM, EIFS-1 07.412 EXTERIOR INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM, EIFS-2 08.132 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM / POLYCARBONATE SECTIONAL ROLL-UP DOOR. 08.210 EXTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS, SF-1. 10.122 BUILDING SIGNAGE, UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT. EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION MFR MODEL/COLOR REMARKS MISC SF-1 STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY KAWNEER 451T, POWDER COAT TO MATCH MR-1 TERRA COTTA WITH CLEAR INSULATED GLASS ROOF MR-1 METAL ROOF PANEL METAL SALES PBR, TERRA COTTA METAL ROOFING AND AWNINGS WALL BR-1 FAUX BRICK PANEL URESTONE USED BRICK, CAPE COD EIFS-1 APPLIED EIFS DRYVIT STUCCO FINISH, TO MATCH MP-2 REGAL BLUE EIFS-2 APPLIED EIFS DRYVIT STUCCO FINISH, EPT-1 PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS TO MATCH MR-1 TERRA COTTA MP-1 ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL SALES T-10 A, METALLIC SILVER VERTICAL ORIENTATION MP-2 ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL SALES TLC-1, REGAL BLUE HORIZONTAL ORIENTATION MTL-1 METAL SCREEN WALL H&H METALS CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAME AND MESH SCREEN PANELS BUILDING MATERIALS SUMMARY GROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY NORTH ELEVATION 40% (32.6 LF) 49.1% (40 LF) REQUIRED PROPOSED REQUIRED PROPOSED SECONDARY MATERIAL (METAL PANEL) NORTH ELEVATION 40% MAX 24.3% (442 SF) EAST ELEVATION 40% MAX 38.1% (328 SF) SOUTH ELEVATION 40% MAX 24.3% (442 SF) WEST ELEVATION 40% MAX 38.1% (328 SF) ST GM WEST 44TH AVENUE GR A Y S T R E E T PROPOSED BUILDING 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.8 1.4 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.7 2.1 1.4 1.1 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.3 1.2 2.6 2.8 1.8 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.8 3.1 2.1 3.4 3.4 3.0 1.4 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.1 3.1 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.6 2.4 4.4 3.7 3.4 3.6 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 4.8 4.3 3.0 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.3 3.4 4.8 6.8 8.3 8.7 9.3 10.0 9.9 9.2 8.2 7.5 7.5 8.5 10.4 10.7 10.3 10.0 9.0 6.9 4.8 3.4 2.2 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.8 3.1 4.5 6.0 7.7 8.4 8.6 9.7 10.4 10.7 10.9 10.8 9.3 8.8 8.9 9.6 11.1 10.9 10.3 9.2 7.9 6.3 4.8 3.2 1.9 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.9 3.1 4.5 6.3 8.4 10.0 10.5 11.9 12.4 12.3 10.6 9.3 11.8 12.2 11.9 11.0 9.5 7.3 5.4 3.4 2.0 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.9 3.1 4.6 6.4 8.4 10.8 11.2 12.3 12.7 12.6 11.7 10.1 12.8 13.1 12.7 12.3 10.9 8.1 6.4 3.8 2.2 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.9 3.1 4.4 5.8 7.4 7.1 3.2 3.3 1.9 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.9 3.1 4.3 5.7 6.6 5.6 3.1 2.0 1.9 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.9 3.1 3.7 4.9 6.6 5.0 2.7 2.0 1.2 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.9 2.8 3.6 4.8 7.1 5.7 3.5 2.3 1.3 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.6 3.5 4.7 6.6 5.7 3.7 2.4 1.4 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.6 2.5 3.4 4.4 5.8 5.4 3.2 2.3 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.5 2.4 3.1 4.1 5.5 5.6 3.6 2.3 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.5 2.5 3.6 4.9 6.5 4.5 2.9 1.9 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.5 2.7 4.1 5.7 7.4 8.1 7.6 8.6 8.3 7.6 6.7 5.2 5.6 6.2 5.9 6.2 5.9 4.1 3.5 2.1 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.2 3.2 4.6 6.1 6.4 6.1 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.3 5.8 4.6 3.4 3.4 5.0 5.8 5.7 5.0 4.5 4.0 2.9 2.3 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.1 1.8 2.6 3.5 4.2 4.3 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.0 4.2 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.5 3.1 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5 2.1 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AA AA AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB CC CC SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 2202.58 02.07.2023 3 Consulting Engineers 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 3 Consulting Engineers PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 7 1" = 10'-0"7 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 N GRADE 32" 10'-8" POLE LIGHT ELEVATION 'AA' Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Lum. Watts Lum. Lumens LLF Catalog 2 CC 25.4 3462 1.000 Calculation Summary Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Site Fc 1.39 13.1 0.0 N.A.N.A. M.H. 10'-0"COOPER - ISW-AF-1000-LED-E1-T4FT 4 AA 34.0 4880 COOPER - GLEON-SA1A-750-U-T4FT14'-0"1.000 COLOR BLACK BLACK 22 BB 21.3 1187 COOPER - LD6B10D010 EU6B10208040 6LBSLI112'-0"1.000 BLACK SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 2202.58 02.07.2023 3 Consulting Engineers 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 3 Consulting Engineers LIGHTING DETAILS 8 8 OF 8 FIXTURE AA: GLEON-SA1B-740-U-T4FT1 FIXTURE BB: LD6B10D010 EU6B10208040 6LBSLI12 3 FIXTURE CC: ISW-AF-1000-LED-E1-T4FT 8 OF 8 8 OF 8 FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" FLOOR 0" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 2/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 1 0 : 4 0 : 4 0 A M 1/8" = 1'-0" COLOR ELEVATIONS 2202.58 9 02.07.2023 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1/8" = 1'-0"9 NORTH ELEVATION1 1/8" = 1'-0"9 EAST ELEVATION2 1/8" = 1'-0"9 SOUTH ELEVATION4 1/8" = 1'-0"9 WEST ELEVATION3 Attachment 4 Letter Correspondence between the City and Autowash Contents include: •June 24, 2025 - Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance •June 25, 2025 - Autowash Response to Notice of SUP Noncomplaince •June 26, 2025 - City Reply to Autowash •Sept 15, 2025 - City Request for Autowash update •Sept 26, 2025 - Autowash Request for reopening •Sept 30, 2025 - City Response •Apr 16, 2026 - Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance •Apr 23, 2026 - Revised Second Notice City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us June 24, 2025 Muth Properties LLC 26201 W 108th St Olathe, KS 66061 Subject: Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, Following recent discussions with the City Manager and City Attorney’s Office, and in response to continued concerns from Wheat Ridge City Councilmembers and neighboring residents, I am writing to provide formal notice of noncompliance with the conditions and representations of the Special Use Permit (SUP-23-01) issued on January 16, 2024 for the Lakeside Autowash facility at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, pursuant to Section 26-114.F.2 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code. As you are aware, complaints from neighboring residents persist. While we appreciate your responsiveness to date, the operation and maintenance of the carwash is creating an impact on the neighborhood. Complaints began in March 2025, the need for a sound study was first raised on May 1, and your June 20 update estimates a final report in mid-August with no timeline for mitigation. That timeline is simply too long given the continued and significant impact on nearby homes—particularly from the air dryers, which remain a source of acute concern. Finding of Noncompliance The following issues constitute noncompliance with the approved SUP:  Door Operations: The SUP application materials depicted bay doors as closed. In practice, the south-facing door have not been consistently closed since opening, and the north door remains open during the wash and dry cycle.  Operational Noise Impacts on the Neighborhood: The SUP narrative submitted with the application states: “The proposed new car wash replaces an existing car wash. It will not have a detrimental effect on the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood.” Based on ongoing complaints and field observations, staff finds that the carwash as proposed in the SUP application has been significantly altered, specifically dryer operations are taking place with doors open during operations. The operation and maintenance of the carwash and the associated noise levels is having a detrimental effect and is degrading the welfare and quality of life of persons residing and working in the area. 2 Per Section 26-114.F.2, this letter serves as formal notice that corrective measures must be taken by each of the deadlines listed below. Failure to address any of these issues by the associated prescribed deadlines will result in the scheduling of a revocation hearing before City Council. Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines 1. Modified Operational Hours Effective immediately, the carwash may not be operational between the hours of 9:55pm and 7am. It is unclear if these hours are being implemented consistently. 2. Evidence of Signed Sound Study Contract By Friday, June 27, 2025, provide via email evidence of a signed contract with the sound consultant. 3. Removal of 24-Hour Signage By Monday, June 30, 2025, remove, cover, or revise on-site signage that advertises 24/7 operation to comply with Corrective Action #1 and to align with your June 20 assurance regarding hours. Of note, the south side doors continue to advertise 24- hour operations. Send confirmation of completeness via email by such date. 4. Immediate Noise Mitigation By Thursday, July 3, 2025, the following operational changes shall be implemented:  All wash bays shall have both entry and exit doors fully closed during operation.  Dryers shall be disabled until such time as the sound study is complete and mitigation measures are in place such as to effectively address the noise impact on the neighborhood. 5. Progress Report By Monday, July 14, 2025, the following documentation shall be submitted:  Sound Monitoring Data: Provide all available data collected to date, including measurements under various operating scenarios (e.g., one bay vs. multiple bays, start of wash vs. middle of wash vs. dryer) and at different locations. If dryers have been turned off pursuant to corrective action #4 above, they may be temporarily reactivated for testing purposes with advance notice to the city of at least two business days.  Point-of-Sale (POS) Data: Submit transaction-level data, with time stamps by bay, for usage from April 1 through July 1.  Updated Operational Summary: Provide the city with the following: o Modifications made since June 20, 2025. o Current standard operating procedures for doors and dryers. o Any additional temporary or permanent noise mitigation measures now in place. 6. Draft Report By Friday, August 15, 2025, submit draft sound study report with recommendations. 3 7. Mitigation Measures Upon review of the draft report, additional deadlines will be established. I urge you to treat these as firm deadlines and to respond fully. If the corrective actions identified in this letter are not resolved by each of the specified dates, the city will initiate the scheduling of a revocation hearing before City Council in accordance with code Section 26-114.F.2. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak, AICP Community Development Director cc: Evan Singleton Dennis Dreeszen Erin Dreeszen Jeff Kwolkosi City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file John Peckler Direct Dial: 303-839-3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com SPENCER FANE LLP | 1700 LINCOLN STREET, SUITE 2000, DENVER, CO 80203-4554 | 303.839.3800 | FAX | spencerfane.com June 25, 2025 VIA E-MAIL Lauren Mikulak, AICP City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Director 7500 W. 29th Avenue, 2nd Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us Gerald Dahl, Esq. City Attorney City of Wheat Ridge 710 Kipling Street, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80215 gdahl@mdbrlaw.com Re: Response to Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash - SUP- 23-01 – 5900 W. 44th Avenue Dear Ms. Mikulak: Spencer Fane LLP represents the operators (“Autowash”) of the Autowash Lakeside carwash (“Carwash”), located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80212. I am in receipt of the Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash dated June 24, 2025 (“Notice of Noncompliance”). Autowash disputes the findings of noncompliance outlined in the Notice of Noncompliance because the City has failed to show that Autowash has not adhered to or has been found to have materially altered in scope, application, or design any stipulation or condition of SUP-23-01 (“SUP”) in the operation of the Carwash. Therefore, because the City has not demonstrated non-compliance with any stipulation or condition of the SUP, the City is exceeding its enforcement authority under Section 26-114.F of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code in seeking the Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines described in the Notice of Noncompliance. Notwithstanding Autowash’s position regarding the SUP enforcement, in the interest of being a responsible business and neighbor, however, Autowash requests that the City grant a 90-day extension for compliance with all Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines described in the Notice of Noncomliance during which 90-day period Autowash will voluntarily suspend operation of the Carwash, obtain and sound study, and coordinate with the City on potential additional mitigation measures or operational changes, and complete any additional sound testing to evaluate the results of mitigation put into place as a result of this process. Autowash’s proposed 90-day extension during Lauren Mikulak Gerald Dahl June 25, 2025 Page 2 DE 10130537.1 which the Carwash will suspend all operations would be effective on Monday, June 30, 2025, and will result in immediate action that fully mitigates the noise impacts from the Carwash on the nearby homes and businesses. This approach will also provide the City and Autowash with more time and flexibility to investigate and evaluate potential long-term solutions without causing any additional impacts to residents or Autowash’s business. During the 90-day suspension of Carwash operations, the app for using the Carwash will show the Carwash as “offline” and “coming soon,” the kiosks will have closed messages rotating on the screens, and the Carwash itself will be inoperable. Except to the extent required to complete the purposes of the initial sound study and additional sound testing, the temporary suspension of all Carwash operations will remain until the end of the 90-day extension or sooner on mutual agreement of the City and Autowash. Autowash will give the City two days prior written notice of the date scheduled for any sound testing so that the Carwash can be reponed and used for all purposes necessary to complete such testing. Autowash will also commit to providing the City with a copy of the sound study during the proposed 90-day extension and giving the City updates on any additional mitigation measures or sound testing as a result of the initial sound study. Autowash hopes that the proposed 90-day extension for compliance with all Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines in the Notice of Noncompliance will achieve the purpose for issuing the Notice of Noncompliance, and allow Autowash with the time needed to complete the sound study, evaluate additional mitigation options, and complete any additional testing required to assess the effectiveness of any mitigation measures put into place. Autowash understands the nature of the City’s concerns and is offering the City with an option to provide certainty that there will not be any additional impact on nearby homes and businesses while Autowash evaluates long-term options to address such concerns. In Autowash’s opinion, the requested 90-day extension better protects the residents of the City and provides Autowash with the flexibility necessary to find long-term solutions. If the City is willing to accept Autowash’s proposal, Autowash requires that the City confirm in writing that all Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines in the Notice of Noncompliance have been extended for 90 days on the condition that Autowash suspend Carwash operations effective on June 30, 2025, through the remainder of such extension. To provide Autowash with the necessary time to suspend operations by Monday, June 30, 2025, Autowash requires that the City confirm in writing the 90-day extension no later than noon on June 26, 2025. We look forward to your prompt response to this letter. Sincerely, Spencer Fane LLP John Peckler JP City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us June 26, 2025 John Peckler Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 Denver, CO 80203-4554 Muth Properties LLC 26201 W 108th St Olathe, KS 66061 Subject: Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, The City is in receipt of your letter of June 25, 2025 in response to the referenced Notice of Special Use Permit (SUP) Noncompliance. The City appreciates your prompt response to the Notice. The City hereby accepts Autowash’s proposal for a 90-day extension for compliance with all Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines in the Notice of Noncompliance. I am certain the neighborhood will appreciate that the carwash will be closed to customer operations from June 30 through September 28. Further, the City accepts and agrees with the description of that suspension and the activities proposed to take place during that period as described in the fourth paragraph of your June 25 letter, beginning with, “During the 90-day suspension of Carwash operations…” During the 90-day period, your city contact for reports and the required two-day prior written notice of sound testing and any other operations will be myself. At the conclusion of the 90-day period, unless terminated earlier by mutual agreement of Autowash and the City, the Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines in the June 24, 2025 Notice of Noncompliance will recommence. It is the City’s hope that some or all of those requirements will be made unnecessary as a result of the work which Autowash proposes to undertake during the 90-day period. 2 Please acknowledge receipt of this letter. In any event, if this letter raises questions or does not accurately represent our understanding, please contact me immediately. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak, AICP Community Development Director cc: Evan Singleton Dennis Dreeszen Erin Dreeszen Jeff Kwolkosi City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us September 15, 2025 Muth Properties LLC 26201 W 108th St Olathe, KS 66061 Subject: Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, This letter is a request for an update and action related to the Lakeside Autowash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue. On June 24, 2025 the City issued a Notice of Noncompliance identifying required corrective actions and the potential for a revocation hearing. In response, your June 25 letter proposed a voluntary 90-day closure, during which you committed to: • Providing the City with two days’ written notice of sound testing, • Providing the City with a copy of the sound study, • Evaluating additional mitigation measures and giving City updates on such measures, and • Completing additional testing required to assess the effectiveness of any mitigation measures put into place. You provided notice of testing, and when I requested an update on August 14, you indicated testing had been completed. We are now approaching the end of the 90-day closure period, yet the City has not received the promised sound study or any subsequent updates, submittals, or coordination. The City’s strong preference remains resolve this matter cooperatively, however, failure to complete the work and share the products described in your June 25 letter leaves only two options: 1) The June 24 Notice of Noncompliance will be reinstated, and the City will consider scheduling a revocation hearing under Section 26-114.F.2 of the Municipal Code; or 2) Autowash must extend its voluntary suspension to allow time to complete the work. The City expects prompt delivery of the sound study along with a description and timeline for proposed mitigation and remaining tasks. If you intend to extend the voluntary suspension, please communicate that proposal immediately. 2 Please respond at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak, AICP Community Development Director cc: Evan Singleton Dennis Dreeszen Erin Dreeszen Jeff Kwolkosi City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file John Peckler Direct Dial: 303-839-3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com SPENCER FANE LLP | 1700 LINCOLN STREET, SUITE 2000, DENVER, CO 80203-4554 | 303.839.3800 | FAX | spencerfane.com September 26, 2025 VIA E-MAIL Lauren Mikulak, AICP City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Director 7500 W. 29th Avenue, 2nd Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us Gerald Dahl, Esq. City Attorney City of Wheat Ridge 710 Kipling Street, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80215 gdahl@mdbrlaw.com Re: Response to Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash - SUP- 23-01 – 5900 W. 44th Avenue Dear Ms. Mikulak: Spencer Fane LLP represents the operators (“Autowash”) of the Autowash Lakeside carwash (“Carwash”), located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80212. On June 24, 2025, the City of Wheat Ridge (“City”) issued Autowash a Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance (“Notice of Noncompliance”) for the Carwash. Autowash responded to the Notice of Noncompliance on June 25th in a letter (“90-Day Stay Letter”) offering in lieu of the Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines in the Notice of Noncompliance an agreement between the parties for a 90- day stay on enforcement of the various compliance deadlines during which period Autowash would voluntarily suspend operation of the Carwash, obtain and sound study, and coordinate with the City on potential additional mitigation measures or operational changes. On June 26th, the City accepted Autowash’s offer to stay enforcement of the Notice of Noncompliance on the terms proposed by Autowash in the 90-Day Stay Letter. In accordance with the 90-Day Stay Letter, on July 8th Autowash provided the City with notice that it would be operating the Carwash to complete the sound testing on July 11th. In that communication, Autowash also clarified that during the voluntary suspension of commercial operations Autowash would continue to perform routine maintenance and testing of the Carwash equipment between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:00 pm by running each bay of the Carwash with the bay doors open once per day to observe the equipment and identify any potential issues. Autowash agreed to disable the dryers during the routine maintenance. On July 8th, the City confirmed that the proposed date for the sound Lauren Mikulak Gerald Dahl September 26, 2025 Page 2 DE 10406846.1 testing and the routine maintenance activities were both acceptable. On July 9th, Autowash followed up with the City to give notice that due to weather conditions, the sound testing would be postponed until July 14th. Wave Engineering (“Sound Engineer”) completed the sound testing at and around the Carwash on July 14th including by taking sound measurements at the specific locations near the Carwash that were requested by the City. On September 19, 2025, Autowash provided the City with a copy of the sound study (“Sound Study”) evaluating the Carwash that was prepared by the Sound Engineer. On September 25th, Autowash and the City met to discuss the findings of the Sound Study and the recommended mitigation measures for the Carwash. During that meeting, Autowash committed to installing a 6’ sound fence (“Sound Fence”) meeting the design and material requirements described in the Sound Study. After the meeting, Autowash provided the City with preliminary drawings showing the general design and materials that would be used for the Sound Fence, and the City’s Building Division confirmed that the Sound Fence falls under the City’s building permit exemption for 6’ fences. Based on all of the above activities, Autowash and the City have satisfied the requirements of the 90-Day Stay Letter. Subject to Autowash’s voluntary compliance with the following requirements, Autowash respectfully requests that the City withdraw the Notice of Noncompliance and allow the Carwash to reopen. 1. The temporary suspension of all commercial Carwash operations will remain until Autowash has caused the installation of the Sound Fence. During the continued temporary suspension of commercial Carwash operations, Autowash can continue to perform routine maintenance and testing of the Carwash equipment between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:00 pm with the dryers disconnected. 2. Once the Sound Fence is installed, the Carwash can operate between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 3. Once the Sound Fence is installed, Autowash will have the Sound Engineer test the sound levels of the Carwash using the same equipment and measurement locations that were used in the Sound Study and share those results with the City. 4. Autowash reserves the right to modify any of the voluntary operational requirements proposed in this letter after coordination with the City on such modifications. Autowash understands and recognizes the nature of the City’s concerns and is committed to continuing to cooperate with the City to find workable solutions. Moreover, Autowash will continue to evaluate measures for reducing the sound from the Carwash as part of being a responsible business and good neighbor. As evidence of such commitment, Autowash is actively developing and evaluating new equipment that could further mitigate sound from the Carwash. Autowash believes that the requirements proposed above will adequately address the City’s concerns as described in the Notice of Noncompliance, and allow Autowash to reopen the Carwash for commercial operations in accordance with the terms of SUP-23-01. If the City is willing to accept Autowash’s proposal as described in this letter, please confirm so in writing before the expiration of the stay in enforcement under the 90-Day Stay Letter. We look forward to your prompt response to this letter and continued cooperation. Lauren Mikulak Gerald Dahl September 26, 2025 Page 3 DE 10406846.1 Sincerely, Spencer Fane LLP John Peckler JP City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us September 30, 2025 John Peckler Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 Denver, CO 80203-4554 Muth Properties LLC 26201 W 108th St Olathe, KS 66061 Subject: Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, The City is in receipt of your letter dated September 26, 2025. We appreciate the commitments outlined in your correspondence, including the voluntary continuation of the suspension of operations until installation of the sound fence, as well as the commitment to retest sound levels using the same methodology and to share those results with the City. These steps are important to advancing resolution of the concerns identified in the Notice of Noncompliance. As you move forward, please keep the City informed regarding scheduling and progress on installation of the sound fence and the subsequent retesting. Before recommencing public operations, please contact us so that we can confirm that the required steps have been completed. For clarity, the June 24 Notice of Noncompliance will not be withdrawn at this time. Rather, the City will hold it in abeyance pending completion of the commitments described in your September 26 letter and this correspondence. If this letter raises questions, please reach out. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak, AICP Community Development Director 2 cc: Evan Singleton Dennis Dreeszen Erin Dreeszen Jeff Kwolkosi City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us April 16, 2026 John Peckler Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 Denver, CO 80203-4554 Subject: Second Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance and Revocation Hearing – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, The purpose of this letter is to provide a second notice of noncompliance related to the approved Special Use Permit (“SUP”) for Lakeside Autowash, located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, and to provide notice of a public revocation hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council who will hear evidence concerning the nature and extent of the alleged noncompliance with the conditions of the SUP. The first Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance was issued on June 24, 2025. This second notice is given in compliance with Section 26-114.F of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (“Code”). A public hearing has been set for Monday, May 11, 2026 at 6:30pm before the Wheat Ridge City Council for the purpose of reviewing the Special Use Permit and associated conditions related to the Lakeside Autowash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, and if necessary, taking action with respect to that SUP. Background The subject property, located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, is zoned Commercial-One (C-1) and has operated as a carwash since 1997. The prior use consisted of an automatic bay and four open self-service bays. The surrounding area includes a mix of commercial uses, with a residential neighborhood located to the south. From July 2022 to June 2024, Autowash pursued redevelopment of the site, including demolition of the existing structure and construction of a new automatic carwash. Because carwashes are permitted only through a Special Use Permit (SUP) in the C-1 zone district, an SUP application (Case No. SUP-23-01) was submitted and required discretionary review. The SUP application materials, including architectural elevations, depicted a facility with doors on both sides of each bay, consistently shown in the closed position. The proposal was reviewed through multiple rounds of staff review and public notice. A neighborhood meeting was held prior to the application submittal in August 2022, and a formal notice period occurred prior to 2 conclusion of the application review in December 2023. No public comments were received during the formal notice period. On January 16, 2024, I approved the SUP administratively following all required public notice and based on findings that the proposed use would not have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area and would not create impacts greater than those allowed under existing zoning. These findings were informed in part by the expectation that the new facility would improve upon the prior condition, including through enclosed bays. Construction was completed in early 2025, and a Certificate of Occupancy was issued on February 2, 2025. The carwash began operations shortly thereafter. Within weeks of opening, the City began receiving complaints regarding noise, hours of operation, and the opening of bay doors during operation. Complaints were submitted through multiple channels, including via emails, phone calls, testimony at City Council meetings, service requests, and directly to the Police Department. Commencing in April 2025, City staff-initiated outreach to Autowash with a focus on achieving voluntary compliance with the SUP and addressing operational impacts. This included: • Multiple meetings with Autowash, its legal counsel, and technical consultants; • Requests for sound studies and operational adjustments; • Documentation of concerns related to open bay doors and neighborhood impacts; and ultimately • Issuance of a Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance on June 24, 2025. Following issuance of the June 24, 2025 Notice of Noncompliance, Autowash proposed and implemented a voluntary 90-day closure to allow for further analysis and mitigation. During and after this period: • A sound study was commissioned by Autowash and mitigation measures were explored, including a proposed sound wall; • The City and Autowash coordinated on potential design solutions and operational changes; • Autowash installed a six-foot tall fence on the southern property line; and • The facility reopened under modified conditions, including limited hours (7:00am to 10:00pm) and limited operations (only three of the four bays). Despite these efforts, the City continued to receive complaints and observed that operational conditions—including inconsistent use of bay doors and ongoing noise impacts—remained unresolved. The City undertook independent third-party sound analysis in March 2026 to better understand existing conditions. While technical data has informed discussions, the core issue remains whether the use, as operated, satisfies the discretionary criteria of the SUP. Over the course of more than one year, the City has pursued voluntary compliance, operational adjustments, technical study, and facilitated dialogue including the offer of professional 3 mediation. These efforts have not resulted in sustained resolution of the identified impacts on the surrounding area. Accordingly and consistent with Code Section 26-114.F, I have determined that formal review by City Council is necessary to evaluate the status of the Special Use Permit and to determine whether modification, additional conditions, or revocation is warranted to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding area. Special Use Permit Authority and Findings Pursuant to Section 26-114.A of the Code, special uses are discretionary and may be approved only where they are properly designed, developed, operated, and maintained such that potential adverse impacts are mitigated. Applicable criteria for review include the following: • The special use will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood; and • The special use will not create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing zoning for the property. Based on the City’s review of operations since the facility opened in February 2025, including documented complaints, staff observations, and ongoing compliance efforts, the City has determined that: • The operation of the carwash has resulted in ongoing adverse impacts to the surrounding area, particularly related to noise and operational characteristics; and • The facility is not operating in a manner consistent with the representations and assumptions underlying the SUP approval, including the depiction and expected use of enclosed bays. These findings are not based on a single incident, but rather on a pattern of operational impacts and unsuccessful attempts to achieve sustained compliance through voluntary measures. These findings form the basis of my request for a hearing and Council action. Public Hearing A public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council has been scheduled as follows: • Date: Monday, May 11, 2026 • Time: 6:30 PM • Location: Wheat Ridge City Council Chambers (7500 W. 29th Avenue) At this hearing, City Council will consider the status of the Special Use Permit pursuant to Code Section 26-114.F, including the authority: • To cancel or revoke the Special Use Permit; • To require certain corrective measures to be taken; and/or • To modify the conditions which apply to the SUP. The order of proceedings at the hearing will be: • Staff presentation 4 • Autowash (SUP holder) presentation • Public comment • Autowash response to public comment • Questions from Council to staff and Autowash • Close the public hearing • Council discussion and action You may submit materials for City Council’s review in advance of the meeting. Materials must be received by Friday, May 1 at 11:00am for inclusion in the meeting packet, and should be emailed directly to me at lmikulak@wheatridge.gov. You may also present testimony and evidence at the hearing. Public Notice In accordance with Section 26-109 of the Code: • The City will publish notice of the hearing in the official newspaper; • The City will mail letter notice of the hearing to property owners and occupants within 1,000 feet; and • Posted notice of the hearing is also required on the property. To accomplish this, the City will prepare the required posting signs. The signs are ready for pickup at Wheat Ridge City Hall in the Community Development Department (7500 W. 29th Avenue, Second Floor). Please arrange to retrieve and post these signs on the property by end of day on Friday, April 24. Closing The City has made extensive efforts to work collaboratively toward a resolution. While your efforts over the last year are acknowledged, the impacts have persisted, and formal review by City Council is now necessary. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this process. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak, AICP Community Development Director cc: Evan Singleton, Spencer Fane Dennis Dreeszen, Autowash Erin Dreeszen, Autowash Muth Properties LLC, Property Owner Derek Dummermuth, Property Owner Registered Agent City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us April 23, 2026 John Peckler Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 Denver, CO 80203-4554 Subject: Revised Second Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance and Revocation Hearing – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, The purpose of this letter is to provide a revision to the April 16, 2026 Second Notice of Noncompliance related to the approved Special Use Permit (“SUP”) for Lakeside Autowash, located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue. The April 16 notice established a public hearing date of Monday, May 11, 2026. At your request due to a scheduling conflict, the City has rescheduled the hearing. A public hearing is now set for Monday, May 18, 2026 at 6:30pm before the Wheat Ridge City Council for the purpose of reviewing the Special Use Permit and associated conditions related to the Lakeside Autowash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, and if necessary, taking action with respect to that SUP. This notice supplements the April 16 notice. Please refer to that letter for full background, findings, and procedural information. The following deadlines have been updated to reflect the new hearing date: •Written materials for City Council’s advance review must be received by Friday, May 8 at 11:00 AM • Monday, May 4 2 cc: Evan Singleton, Spencer Fane Dennis Dreeszen, Autowash Erin Dreeszen, Autowash Muth Properties LLC, Property Owner Derek Dummermuth, Property Owner Registered Agent City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file Attachment 5 Sound Studies September 19, 2025 Erin Dreeszen Founder, Chief of Staff Autowash Companies 9525 E 40th Ave #110 Denver, CO 80238 Re: Autowash – Wheat Ridge Acoustical Report Wave #3441 Dear Erin, We measured ambient sound levels at the Autowash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue in Wheat Ridge, from July 14 to July 16, 2025. We also measured sound levels at various points around the property and in the neighborhood on July 14 while carwash equipment was operating. The purpose of the measurements was to determine the existing carwash operating noise levels and the ambient noise levels in the area. We used the data from equipment operation to build a noise model of the existing conditions and to evaluate potential mitigation measures to reduce noise and meet the City of Wheat Ridge noise limit. Our comments and recommendations are made with respect to meeting acoustical objectives only. They may have implications on compliance with other zoning regulations (i.e., fence heights). If we need to make adjustments to meet other code requirements or zoning regulations, we will work with you to do so. Wheat Ridge Noise Criteria The Notice of Violation for Case No. 25-1878 from the City of Wheat Ridge states that the applicable noise limits for the carwash property are 65 dBA from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and 60 dBA from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. We measured noise around the Autowash premises, along the south property line, and in the neighborhood with various pieces of carwash equipment running. We also measured the ambient noise level at the southeast corner of your site for 24 hours, for comparison. This should be representative of ambient noise levels in the area. Autowash 1st sound study Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 2 Equipment The following test equipment was used. Long-term – unattended Larson Davis Model 831C sound level meter S/N 10640, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 058373 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 310349 Sierra Wireless Airlink RV50 cellular modem Larson Davis EPS2116 Environmental Shroud, windscreen and bike spike On-site – handheld Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0002878, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 023893 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 314955 AND Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0001119, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 026106 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 138652 Larson Davis CAL200 acoustic calibrator, S/N 11780 The sound meter calibration was checked before and after the measurements. Measurement Procedures Long-term – unattended A meter was set up along the property line at the southeast corner of the property, near the carwash entrance from Gray Street. The meter ran from Monday night, July 14, 2025, to Wednesday morning, July 16, 2025. The measurement location is M6 shown in green on Figure 1 below. The (LEQ) is the Equivalent Sound Level is the average level during the hour. The L90 is the 90 percentile sound level. It is the sound level that is exceeded 90% of the time. It can be thought of as the sound level during lulls in traffic and other sound “events.” The measured sound levels are shown in Table 1. Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 3 Table 1: Hourly measured sound level – long-term Location M6 – July 15 Hour LEQ (dBA) L90 (dBA) Hour LEQ (dBA) L90 (dBA) 12:00 AM 47 40 12:00 PM 58 53 1:00 AM 46 40 1:00 PM 62 54 2:00 AM 45 40 2:00 PM 57 55 3:00 AM 44 40 3:00 PM 58 55 4:00 AM 49 44 4:00 PM 57 54 5:00 AM 54 51 5:00 PM 56 51 6:00 AM 58 53 6:00 PM 57 48 7:00 AM 57 53 7:00 PM 55 50 8:00 AM 57 52 8:00 PM 57 49 9:00 AM 60 51 9:00 PM 61* 59 10:00 AM 56 53 10:00 PM 57 47 11:00 AM 57 54 11:00 PM 49 43 * Peak cicada activity. The ambient noise in the area is predominantly from traffic on W. 44th Avenue, N. Harlan Street, and other secondary streets. Noise from cicadas was significant at times. During the day, traffic noise is generally in the range of 55 – 60 dBA. At night, the average sound level drops to 44 to 50 dBA. During lulls in traffic, the quietest times of the night are as low as 40 dBA. Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 4 Short-term – attended spot measurements Two Wave consultants visited the site on Monday, July 14 to measure the noise level of various Autowash noise sources around the property and in the neighborhood. Ambient measurements were taken at the south property line and in the neighborhood for comparison. The measurement locations are shown on Figure 1. Figure 1: Measurement locations We started by taking measurements just outside of the entry and exit doors of the east-most wash bay while a car ran through a full cycle to compare various cycle noise sources. Those results are shown in Table 2. The north exit door was open during the entire cycle. The south entry door closes after the car enters the carwash. The undercarriage wash occurs as the car enters the bay, so the door is open. W 44th Ave Gr a y S t N H a r l a n S t M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 Key: Spot measurement – on-site Spot measurement – neighborhood Long-term measurements – on-site Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 5 Table 2: Autowash cycle measurements – East Bay Measurement Location Source Sound Level (dBA) N Wash Bay door (exit) Undercarriage wash – Dryers 94 Middle of cycle 83 S Wash Bay door (entry) Undercarriage wash 82 Dryers 86 Middle of cycle 69 The dryers produced the loudest noise on both the north and south sides of the wash bay. The undercarriage wash was about 4 dB quieter than the dryers and it only runs for about 8 seconds at a time. During the cycle, the south bay door was open as the car drove in (during the undercarriage wash), and was closed during the rest of the cycle. The north bay door was open during the entire cycle. We then moved on to spot measurements with the vacuums running and the dryers running. These results are shown in Table 3, with relevant ambient sound levels for comparison. It was difficult at times to measure the carwash equipment in the neighborhood, particularly the vacuums, due to traffic and other ambient noise in the area. When that is the case, the Autowash equipment noise cannot be accurately measured and the measured levels are a combination of the background sound and equipment sound. Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 6 Table 3: Measured sound levels – spot locations Event Source Measurement Location Equipment Sound Level (dBA) Reference Ambient Sound Level (dBA) Difference from Ambient 3 Vacuums M1: 3ʹ from S Vacuum 79 – – M6: S Property Line – E corner 54 55 N/A M5: S Property Line – center 59 57 +2 dB M4: S Property Line – S of vacuums 63 62 +1 dB M7: 4380 Harlan – street edge 48 49 N/A M8: 4345 Gray St – street edge 65 66 N/A M9: 4325 Gray St – street edge 46 47 N/A 4 Dryers M2: 12ʹ N of E Wash Bay 94 – – M3: 5ʹ S of E Wash Bay 86 – – M6: S Property Line – E corner 68 55 +13 dB M5: S Property Line – center 71 66 +5 dB M4: S Property Line – S of vacuums 70 67 +3 dB M7: 4380 Harlan – street edge 57 49 +8 dB M8: 4345 Gray St – street edge 68 66 +2 dB M9: 4325 Gray St – street edge 52 47 +5 dB Cicada activity in one particular tree significantly increased the sound level near the southeast corner of the Autowash property and near 4345 Gray St during some measurements. As shown in Table 1, the peak cicada activity at this time of year took place around 9 PM. We were able to use these measured values to inform our model and predict the level for various operational and treatment scenarios. Predictive Sound Model We used Datakustic CadnaA noise prediction software to develop a 3D computer model to calculate noise levels from the Autowash property. The software takes into account sound that radiates from each noise source, the effect of the terrain, buildings, berms, barriers, and atmospheric conditions. The calculations are done according to the methodology of ISO Standard 9613-2: Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors, Part 2: General method of calculation. This is an international standard for predicting noise transmission Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 7 outdoors. The calculations assume downwind conditions in all directions. This is not possible in reality but gives more of a worst-case prediction. The measured sound levels around the perimeter of the carwash property and in the neighborhood were used to calibrate the model, and then the model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation measures. The sound level prediction locations are shown on Figure 2. Note that Locations 7, 8, and 9 are the same between the measurement and prediction figures. The other locations are unique. Figure 2: Prediction locations The measured carwash and vacuum noise levels were used for the sound sources in the model. The noise levels in Table 4 include all of the vacuums running simultaneously, and either two or four carwash bay dryers running (as indicated). It is unlikely that all of the vacuums will run simultaneously but this should represent the worst case. When the undercarriage wash or the W 44th Ave Gr a y S t N H a r l a n S t P10 P11 P7 P9 P8 P12 Key: Predicted sound level location Autowash Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 8 washing cycle are occurring in any or all bays, the sound level will be lower than with the dryers running. Again, the model should represent the worst case since it only shows dryers running simultaneously. Table 4 shows the sound levels predicted for two scenarios – with all four carwash bays operating simultaneously, and with only the two west bays operating. Table 4 includes the effect of a 6ʹ sound barrier along the south property line (where a wood fence exists currently). The sound barrier will run east west along the entire south property line. It is on top of a slope so that its effective height is approximately 8′ above the carwash grade. The predicted sound levels do not include ambient noise from traffic or other noise sources in the area. Table 4: Predicted Sound Levels from Carwash Operations Prediction Location Predicted Sound Level (dBA) All 4 wash bays and all vacuums 2 west wash bays and all vacuums P7: 4380 Harlan – street edge 56 56 P8: 4345 Gray St – street edge 60 58 P9: 4325 Gray St – street edge 55 53 P10: 4355 Gray St. (back yard) 61 60 P11: 4355 Gray St. (front yard) 62 60 P12: 4350 Gray St. (NW prop. line) 61 59 With all four bays operating, the sound levels in the front and backyard of 4355 Gray Street, behind the barrier, are reduced to 61 and 62 dBA, respectively. This meets the daytime noise limits but not the nighttime limits at the property line. All other locations at residences south of the carwash remain at or below 65 dBA. With only the two westernmost bays operating, the sound levels in the front and backyard of 4355 Gray Street, behind the barrier, are reduced to 60 and 60 dBA, respectively. This meets the daytime noise and nighttime limits at the south property line. All other locations at residences south of the carwash remain at or below 65 dBA. Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 9 Summary Carwash equipment noise levels were measured and used to develop a 3D noise model. The model was then used to evaluate the effectiveness of a sound barrier on the south property line. A 6′ sound barrier on the 2′ slope (8′ effective height) can reduce noise levels from all four carwash bays operating to meet the Wheat Ridge daytime limit of 65 dBA at the south property line. If only the two westernmost bays operate, the barrier can reduce noise levels to meet the nighttime limit of 60 dBA at the south property line. The ambient sound levels were measured. During the day, traffic noise is generally in the range of 55 – 60 dBA. At night, the average sound level drops to 44 to 50 dBA. During lulls in traffic, the quietest times of the night are as low as 40 dBA. There are many options for sound barrier materials. Common sound barrier materials are steel, aluminum, wood, masonry, and PVC. A rule of thumb is that the barrier should be to 2 to 4 pounds per square feet and be airtight. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this further. Sincerely, Jeff Kwolkoski, P.E., INCE Bd. Cert. Senior Acoustical Engineer November 6, 2025 Erin Dreeszen Founder, Chief of Staff Autowash Companies 9525 E 40th Ave #110 Denver, CO 80238 Re: Autowash – Wheat Ridge Acoustical Report Wave #3441A Dear Erin, We measured ambient sound levels at the south property line and at various points in the neighborhood near the Autowash property in Wheat Ridge on November 5, 2025. The purpose of the visit was to measure the Autowash equipment sound level in the neighborhood with the new sound wall in place. Equipment The following test equipment was used. 4380 Harlan St and S Property Line Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0002878, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 023893 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 314955 4345 Gray St and 4325 Gray St Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0001119, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 026106 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 138652 Larson Davis CAL250 acoustic calibrator, S/N 2405 The sound meter calibration was checked before and after the measurements. Autowash sound study after site modifications Erin Dreeszen November 6, 2025 Page 2 Measurement Procedures Two Wave consultants visited the site on Wednesday, November 5 to measure the noise level of Autowash equipment at the south property line and at three locations in the neighborhood. Ambient measurements were taken for comparison as well. The measurement locations are shown on Figure 1. Figure 1: Measurement locations Measurements were taken with dryers running in the west-most two, west-most three, and all four of the wash bays. The three south-most vacuums were also running during the measurements. The measured levels were a combination of Autowash noise and ambient noise (like traffic). Since traffic noise was loud enough to interfere with carwash measurements, we measured each condition for 4 to 5 minutes to find periods when background noise was at its lowest. We evaluated the data and made an effort to use the data from time periods when noise from passing cars and other background activity was at its lowest. We then used the L90 levels W 44th Ave Gr a y S t N H a r l a n S t M6 M7 M8 M9 Key: Spot measurement Sound wall Erin Dreeszen November 6, 2025 Page 3 from Table 1 to correct the measured carwash noise levels. That is, where the background noise levels were within 10 dBA of the carwash levels, the background noise was subtracted out mathematically. This gives the most accurate indication of the actual noise levels of the carwash. The measured background levels results are shown in Table 1 and the carwash results are shown in Table 2. Table 1: Measured background levels – carwash not running Measurement Location Measured Background Level (dBA) LEQ L90 M6: S Property Line – E corner 51 46 M7: 4380 Harlan – street edge 62 50 M8: 4345 Gray St – street edge 50 45 M9: 4325 Gray St – street edge 47 44 The LEQ is the Equivalent Sound Level is the average level during the measurement period. The L90 is the 90 percentile sound level. It is the sound level that is exceeded 90% of the time and can be thought of as the sound level during lulls in traffic and other background sound “events.” Table 2: Autowash equipment sound levels Event Source Measurement Location Equipment Sound Level – background corrected (dBA) W 2 dryers + S 3 vacuums M6: S Property Line – E corner 53 M7: 4380 Harlan – street edge 50 M8: 4345 Gray St – street edge 53 M9: 4325 Gray St – street edge 47 W 3 dryers + S 3 vacuums M6: S Property Line – E corner 56 M7: 4380 Harlan – street edge 50 M8: 4345 Gray St – street edge 56 M9: 4325 Gray St – street edge 48 All 4 dryers + S 3 vacuums M6: S Property Line – E corner 62 M7: 4380 Harlan – street edge 53 M8: 4345 Gray St – street edge 60 M9: 4325 Gray St – street edge 52 Erin Dreeszen November 6, 2025 Page 4 Summary A sound wall was installed along the South property line. The sound level was measured at the South property line (just south of the new wall), and at three locations in the neighborhood with Autowash equipment running. Measurements were taken with 3 vacuums running and the dryers in the west-most 2, west-most 3, and all 4 of the wash bays. The background sound levels were also measured for reference. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this further. Sincerely, Jeff Kwolkoski, P.E., INCE Bd. Cert. Senior Acoustical Engineer 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 5 April 2026 Ms. Lauren Mikulak, AICP Page 1 of 14 City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Voice: 303-235-2845 RE: Sound Level Measurement Results Lakeside Autowash EDI Job # C-4524 Dear Ms. Mikulak: Engineering Dynamic’s has completed sound level measurements of noise from Lakeside Autowash operations for Lakeside Autowash located at 5900 W 44th Ave. Results of the sound level measurements are described below. 1.0 Background 1.1 Measurement Locations In agreement with City of Wheat Ridge personnel sound levels of Autowash noise were measured at Locations as shown in Figure 1.1 and as follows, Locations A, D and G – along the property line between the Autowash and 4355 Gray St. (commercial property), veterinary clinic zoned R-C (Restricted Commercial). Note: Location G was added by EDI to measure sound from vacuum operations. Location B – at the northwest corner of 4360 Gray St. (residential property, zoned MU-N (mixed use-neighborhood). Location C – along the property line between the Autowash and W. 44th Ave. Location E – at the southeast corner of the apartment building property located at 4455 N. Harlans St., zoned R-C (Restricted Commercial). Location F – at the northwest corner of the commercial property due east of the Autowash, 5892 W. 44th Ave. Location H – on north side of W. 44th Ave. directly north of Location C. Location I – on north side of W. 44th Ave. directly north of Location F. Note: Locations H and I were added by EDI to measure sound across 44th. 1.2 Sound Level Measurement Dates Autowash sound level were measured on Tuesday 10-Mar-26 from ~4pm to 7:30pm, and Wednesday 18-Mar-26 from ~9pm to 10pm. During the measurement periods, approximately 50 car wash events were monitored. During the measurement periods there was vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., and Autowash noise levels were documented only when vehicle traffic noise would not artificially increase / affect Autowash noise levels. City sound study City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 2 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 1.3 Instrumentation Sound level measurements were made with a Larson Davis Type 1 Sound Level Analyzer, with a current NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) traceable calibration. The Larson Davis Model 831 Sound Level Meter was field calibrated at the beginning of testing at 94.0 dB. At the completion of all testing the calibration level was checked, with a result of 94.0 dB. The sound level meter was configured to acquire A-weighted, Slow Time constant sound levels in accordance with the City of Wheat Ridge noise ordinance Section 16-103c and the State of Colorado Noise Law, C.R.S. §26-12-103. Instrument Model # Serial # Larson Davis Real Time Analyzer Model 831 0004054 19-Jan-26 19-Jan-27 Larson Davis Acoustic Calibrator CAL 200 12548 19-Jan-26 19-Jan-27 1.4 Methodology Sound level measurements of car wash operations were measured at locations A through I. Measurements were made under typical / normal Autowash operations. During some of the measurements there was only one vehicle wash cycle and during other measurements multiple (two or three) simultaneous or nearly simultaneous vehicle wash cycles. This represents a realistic of the noise impact from Autowash operations on nearby properties. The reported sound levels represent typical and maximum sound level ranges for various car wash cycles, initial entry prewash, wash, drying and vacuum. Interpretation of sound levels as compared to the City of Wheatridge noise ordinance Section 16-103 and the State of Colorado noise law, for a sound level from a commercial property to a commercial and / or residential property. 1.5 Noise Wall along Southern Autowash Property Line Figure 1.5.1 shows a picture of the “Noise Wall;” which has been installed along the property line between the Autowash and the residential property at 4355 Gray St. Figure 1.5.2 shows a picture of the noise wall from the southwest side / corner and shows the noise wall construction. There is an elevation difference between the Autowash driveway grade and the yard elevation of the residence, of ~2-feet. The noise wall was installed at the residence yard grade and has a height of 6-feet above this grade and a height of ~8-feet above the Autowash driveway grade. 2.0 Applicable Noise Ordinance / Law 2.1 City of Wheatridge Noise Ordinance The City of Wheatridge noise limits are described in Article V, Section 16-103 and is shown at the end of this report. Section (§) 16-103c, Table A does not specifically define the condition of commercial property to residential property; it only defines noise from industrial premises onto residential, commercial and industrial premises. Therefore, the applicable noise limits are those as defined in the State of Colorado Noise Law, C.R.S. §26-12-103. [ City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 3 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 2.2 State of Colorado Noise Law C.R.S. 25-12-103 The relevant portions of the State of Colorado Noise Law Section 25-12-103 are attached at the end of this report. CRS §25-12-103 includes the following noise limits: Heavy Industrial Since the subject property is adjacent to both residentially and commercially zoned properties, the decibel readings for each are prescribed by the above table. As defined, commercial to residential limits are the first row. Commercial to commercial limits are the second row. There are no industrially zoned properties adjacent to the site. Table 2.2 shows the applicable noise / sound level compliance levels for the properties associated with each of the measurement locations Table 2.2: Applicable Noise Compliance Limits at each Measurement Location: Measurement Location Adjacent Property Zoning C Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA D1 Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA E 60 dBA 55 dBA F 60 dBA 55 dBA 1 1 3.0 Sound Measurement Results Sound levels were measured for the following portions of a typical Autowash wash cycle, a. Initial vehicle entry into wash bay with pre-wash under carriage and vehicle spry. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building are open and Doors on the north side of the building are closed. b. Spray and Wash. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building and Doors on the north side of the building are closed. City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 4 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com c. Drying Operations. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building and Doors on the north side of the building are open. d. Vacuum Operations Table 3.1 summarizes Autowash sound levels at each measurement location and for each wash cycle. Table 3.2 indicates compliance or non-compliance with applicable noise limits (for any portion of the a wash cycle). Table 3.1: Measured Autowash Noise Levels Measurement Location Autowash Wash Cycle Portion, dBA Initial Spray Rinse and Wash Drying A 63 to 72 51 to 62 52 to 57 1 2 H1 <50 47 to 57 64 I1 <50 <50 <50 Notes: D1 = on Autowash side of noise wall. D2 = on Neighbor side of noise wall. H1 = extrapolated from Location C noise levels. I1 = extrapolated from Location C noise levels. Table 3.2: Compliance with Applicable Noise Limits Measurement Location Adjacent Property Zoning A Commercial No No B Residential No No C Commercial No No D1 Commercial No No 2 No No No No No 1 No No 1 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 5 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Inspection of Tables 3.1 and 3.2 shows the following noise impacts from Autowash operations. Location A – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime commercial noise limits. Note: Autowash operations on the ‘neighbor’ side of the sound wall at Location A, can be extrapolated from the sound level difference between Locations D1 / D2, ~ 5 dBA lower. These reduced sound levels will still exceed the commercial noise limits. Location B – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime residential noise limits. Location C – sound levels from Autowash drying operations are clearly audible, however, noise from Autowash operations is below sound levels generated by vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., which are in the range of 70 to 85 dBA. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location D1 (Autowash side of noise fence) – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime commercial noise limits. Location D2 (Veterinary Clinic side of noise fence) – Autowash noise levels are in the range of 5 to 8 dBA lower on the residence side of the noise wall, then on the Autowash side of the wall. While being lower Autowash initial spray operations still exceed the Daytime and Nighttime commercial noise limits. Location D – vacuum operations (Autowash side of noise wall) are in the range of 55 to 62 dBA depending on the number of cars being vacuumed at one time. Location E – No audible sound impact from all Autowash operations. All car wash operations were less than 50 dBA. Location F – sound levels from Autowash drying operations are clearly audible, however, noise from Autowash operations is below sound levels generated by vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., which are in the range of 70 to 85 dBA. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location G – vacuum operations are in the range of 58 to 65 dBA depending on the number of cars being vacuumed at one time. Vacuum sounds are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime commercial noise limits. Note: Autowash operations on the ‘neighbor’ side of the sound wall at Location G, can be extrapolated from the sound level difference between Locations D1 / D2, ~ 5 dBA lower. These reduced sound levels will still exceed the commercial noise limits. Location H – sound levels from Autowash drying operations will be clearly audible and extrapolated noise levels are below Commercial property noise limits. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location I – sound levels from Autowash drying operations will be clearly audible and extrapolated noise levels are below Commercial property noise limits. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 6 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 3.0 Summary Noise impact from Autowash operations is limited to the buildings / properties directly south of the Autowash, specifically 4355 Gray St. and 4360 Gray St. For residences further south along Gray St. Autowash wash operations will still be audible, they are less than or nearly less than the Daytime and Nighttime residential noise limits. NOTE: Applicability of sound level measurement results The original intent of the sound level measurements was to test a ‘worse case’ operational scenario (all bays and all vacuums operating simultaneously. This operational scenario is not a realistic measure of ‘typical’ Autowash operations and hence sound levels. The measurements were completed for e “typical’ Autowash operations, and since the ‘typical’ Autowash exceed compliance noise limits at some of the measurement locations, the worst-case scenario was not necessary. 4.0 Observation and Mitigation Recommendations Autowash noise level impact on adjacent properties can be reduced with the following mitigation measures. 1. Limit the hours of operation. Limiting the hours of operation from, for example, 7am to 10pm, will eliminate nighttime noise impacts, 2. Modification to the Existing Noise Walls Inspection of the noise wall and as seen in Figures 1.5.1 and 1.5.2 shows, a. The existing noise wall height is insufficient to provide adequate Autowash sound attenuation. The noise wall should have been constructed at least 4-feet higher, so that from the Autowash vehicle entry doors the roof gutter of the residence at 4355 Gray St. is not visible from the Autowash. b. The existing noise wall construction is steel tubing with ¾-inch plywood / OSB and faux (plastic) bricks on the Autowash side. This construction is insufficient and cannot provide adequate sound attenuation for Autowash noise. c. Ensure that the north and south doors remain closed during ALL washing and drying cycles. If you have any questions, please contact me at our Englewood office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING DYNAMICS, INC. Stuart D. McGregor, P.E. President City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 7 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Figure 1.1: Autowash Sound Level Measurement Locations City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 8 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Figure 1.5.1: Autowash Noise Wall from the north side of the wall. Figure 1.5.2: Autowash Noise Wall from Southwest side showing Construction City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 9 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheat Ridge – Noise Ordinance ec. 16-103 Sec. 16-103. Unreasonable noise; disturbing the peace. (a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: Amplified sound shall mean the use or operation of any loudspeaker, public address system, or other sound amplifying equipment for the purpose of giving instructions, directions, talks, addresses or lectures, or for transmitting music or sound to any persons or assemblages of persons outdoors. Amplified sound shall not include sound which is not audible two hundred (200) feet, measured at any point along the property line or within the property line, from the receiving premises. Amplified sound event shall mean an outdoor event at which amplified sound is permitted pursuant to this section. Event location shall mean the real property owned or legally occupied by the permittee at which an amplified sound event is held, extending to the exterior property lines thereof. In the case of a residential neighborhood "block party" or similar function, the event location shall be the public street used for the event. Sound-amplifying equipment shall mean any machine or device for the amplification of a human voice, music or any other sound, or by which the human voice, music or any other sound is amplified. noise shall mean noise generally associated with transportation regulated by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Some construction noise can also be classified as unavoidable and is regulated elsewhere. Unreasonable noise shall mean any noise, which because of its loudness and frequency, while taking into consideration its location and the nature of the typical urban environment, unreasonably disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace or safety of reasonable persons of ordinary sensitivity or causes damage to any property or business. (b) Unlawful noise; residential and commercial properties. It is unlawful for any person to make, continue or cause to be made or to permit or assist another to make, continue or cause to be made, any unreasonable noise which, under all of the circumstances presented, would annoy, injure or endanger the comfort, repose or peace of a person of ordinary sensitivities including but not limited to the following: the sounding of any horn, signaling device, or similar device on any automobile, motorcycle or other vehicle; any amplified signal from any bell, chime, siren, whistle or similar device intended for nonemergency purposes; any signaling device including fire, burglar, siren, whistle unless in an emergency; radios, televisions, boom boxes, phonographs, stereos, musical instruments and similar devices. Unavoidable noise does not qualify as unreasonable noise. The foregoing noises and circumstances shall be deemed as unreasonable: (1) Any unreasonable noise or sound which is audible one hundred (100) or more feet from a mobile noise or sound source. (2) Any unreasonable noise or sound which is audible within a private residence that the person responsible for the sound has no right to occupy, specifically including but not limited to apartments, common interest communities and other multiunit dwelling structures. (3) Any unreasonable noise, sound source or any person or group of persons engaged in loud and continuing activities which are audible and measured at any point along the property line or within the property line of the receiving premises, continuing for a minimum of fifteen (15) minutes in a two (2) hour period. City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 10 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com (4) Any person performing or permitting the performance of trash pickup with a truck which has a compactor or the capacity to raise and dump dumpsters in any area zoned for residential uses between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. For purposes of this paragraph, testimony that the name of a business which holds itself out as being in the business of trash hauling was written on the trash truck shall be prima facie evidence that the trash truck was owned by and under the control of the employer so identified. (c) Unlawful noise; industrial properties. It shall be unlawful for any person to emit or cause to be emitted any noise which leaves the premises on which it originates, crosses a property line, and enters onto any other premises in excess of the sound pressure levels during the time periods as specified in table A. (1) The noise source shall be measured at any point along the property line or within the property line of the receiving premises to determine compliance with this section. (2) The decibel level of any noise regulated on a decibel basis by this article shall be measured by a sound level meter. The test results shall be evidence if administered in conformance with the American National Standards Institute. In order to implement and enforce this article effectively, the chief of police shall promulgate standards and procedures for using and testing sound level meters used in the enforcement of this article. Table A: Allowable Noise Levels (in DBA) with Time of Day Allowance (3) Notwithstanding the foregoing, a business owner in an industrial zone district, upon which there exists a noise source in operation at the time this subsection 16-103(c) becomes effective, may apply to the city manager for a permit for a different decibel level, requirement, and/or time limitation specific to such real property. Such real property owner will submit the following to the city manager as an application for such permit: a. A written request for the decibel level, time and day of week limitations and other elements of the permit desired. b. A noise study prepared by a licensed professional engineer supporting the ability of the applicant to comply with the permit levels and conditions requested or to be imposed. c. Any other documents required by the city manager to render the application complete. The city manager will review the application materials and meet with the applicant within thirty (30) days of such submittal, and shall recommend to city council approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the application by city council. the decision of city council shall be the final decision of the city, subject to judicial appeal. Permit conditions may include, but are not limited to: permitted decibel level(s), time and day of week limitations, term of permit and whether renewal periods are permitted, neighborhood outreach and education, contact for complaints, and authority for the city manager to revoke the permit for failure to comply with limitations and conditions. If the city council approves the permit the city manager will issue the permit. (d) Permit for outdoor amplified sound event. No person shall conduct an outdoor amplified sound event, without first obtaining a permit to do so. The event sponsor must apply for and receive a permit for the event, on forms provided by the city clerk. An outdoor amplified sound event is permitted under this section under the following conditions: (1) A maximum of eight (8) permits may be issued for the same location during a single calendar year, by the city clerk, subject to the conditions and restrictions in subsection 16-103(d)(3) below. City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 11 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com (2) If an applicant wishes to obtain permits for more than eight (8) outdoor amplified sound events at the same location during a single calendar year, an application for all such proposed events must be made to and acted upon by the city manager or designee and, upon appeal, by the city council under the following procedures: a. The application shall be filed with the city manager. b. A neighborhood meeting on the application shall be held by the applicant, upon ten (10) days written notice to all businesses and residents within three hundred (300) feet of the exterior property line of the proposed event location. c. The city manager may grant, grant with conditions, or deny the application, in whole or in part, and in doing so may apply the following criteria, in addition to other site-specific considerations: 1. Proximity of the proposed outdoor amplified sound events to residential neighborhoods, medical facilities and schools; 2. The applicant's history of past compliance with the requirements of this section; 3. The hardship to the applicant, the community and other persons of not granting the permit against the adverse impact on the health, safety and welfare of persons affected. d. The decision of the city manager may be appealed within seven (7) days of the decision date by the applicant or any resident or business owner within three hundred (300) feet of the event location by filing written notice of the same with the city manager. e. The city council shall conduct a public hearing on the appeal, following notice to the applicant and any resident or business owner within three hundred (300) feet of the event location. the council may uphold, modify, or reverse the city manager's decision, in whole or in part. f. The decision of the city manager, or if appealed, the council, shall be the final decision of the city, subject to judicial appeal. (3) All outdoor amplified sound event permits, shall be subject to the following requirements in addition to those imposed by the city manager in each case: a. The application shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the approving authority after review by the police department and any other city department as appropriate. b. No outdoor amplified sound event permit may be issued for an event outside of the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Within this time range, outdoor amplified sound events may be limited in duration as determined by the approving authority. c. The permit shall not authorize, allow, or otherwise permit the production, reproduction, or amplification of sound which exceeds seventy-five (75) dBA when measured from the nearest receiving property. d. Conditions may be imposed on the permit to address the nature and location of the specific event. Failure of the permittee to comply with the conditions may result in the permit being revoked. e. The police department shall have authority to require the permittee to reduce the sound volume, curtail the hours of the event, or close the event entirely, if the sound level at the event, evaluated at the property line of the complaining party constitutes, in the police department's sound judgment, unreasonable noise. City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 12 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com (4) An outdoor amplified sound event for which a permit has been issued shall be exempt from the provisions of (b)(1), (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section. (e) Noise caused in the performance of emergency work for the immediate safety, health, or welfare of the community or individuals of the community, or to restore property to a safe condition following a public calamity shall not be subject to the provisions of this section. (f) Any member of the police department who personally observes a violation of this section may serve as the complaining party in the prosecution of such violation, regardless of whether the officer's observation was initiated by the complaint of another party. (g) Any activity or noise source conducted or caused by an activity conducted or sponsored or approved by the city shall be exempt from the requirements of this section. (h) Enforcement. The city may cancel, revoke, suspend or summarily suspend the business license of any business which permits noise in violation of this section, pursuant to the procedures in Code sections 11-30 through 11-32. (Code 1977, § 14-44.2; Ord. No. 1346, § 1, 6-13-05; Ord. No. 1697, § 1, 8-24-20; Ord. No. 1708, § 1, 2-22-21; Ord. No. 1713, §§ 1, 3, 5-24-21) Ord. No. 1708, adopted February 22, 2021, changed the effective date for subsection 16-103(c) from February 28, 2021 to October 1, 2021. All other portions of section 16-103, as amended by Ord. No. 1697, remain in effect as of September 18, 2020. Ord. No. 1713, adopted May 24, 2021, is effective as of June 11, 2021, provided, however, holders of outdoor amplified sound event permits issued prior to the effective date hereof shall be entitled to: (1) rely on such permits as valid for the entire calendar year 2021, and (2) apply for no more than two (2) additional permits for calendar year 2021 pursuant to section 16-103(d)(1) as revised hereby. City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 13 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 14 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Attachment 6 Autowash Submittal to City Council SPENCER FANE LLP | 1700 LINCOLN ST SUITE 2000 | DENVER, CO 80203-4554 | 303-839-3800 | FAX: 303-839-3838 || spencerfane.com JOHN PECKLER, PARTNER DIRECT DIAL: 303-839-3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com May 8, 2026 Mayor Korey Stites and City Council Members City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Response to Notices of Special Use Permit Non-Compliance and Revocation Hearing - Lakeside Autowash - SUP-23-01 - City of Wheat Ridge (“City”) Dear Mayor Stites and City Council Members: On May 18, 2026, the Wheat Ridge City Council (“City Council”) will hold a public hearing for the purpose of evaluating evidence concerning the nature and extent of the alleged noncompliance with the conditions of Special Use Permit (SUP-23-01) (“SUP”) for Lakeside Autowash’s (“Autowash”) car wash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue (“Car Wash”) as set forth in the First and Second Notices of Special Use Permit Noncompliance. Spencer Fane LLP represents Autowash in connection with that matter. Autowash’s position is that (1) the City has not identified an instance of noncompliance with any condition or stipulation of the SUP and therefore not satisfied the threshold requirement for bringing a special use permit enforcement action under the Wheat Ridge Code of Ordinances (“Code”), (2) there is no competent evidence in the record to support revocation or amendment of the SUP, and (3) the City’s concerns with adverse impacts to the surrounding area related to noise must be addressed through enforcement of the City’s noise ordinance and not by City Council review of the SUP. Therefore, Autowash respectfully requests that the City Council find that no condition or stipulation of SUP-23-01 has been violated and, on that basis, decline to revoke or impose additional conditions on the SUP. Nevertheless, Autowash desires to operate as a responsible locally owned family business and welcomes further data-driven discussions or recommendations from City Council, City staff, or other stakeholders regarding strategies and opportunities for improving Car Wash operations and mitigating potential impacts. The record is full of examples of how Autowash has innovated to modify operations at the Car Wash and install mitigation measures to improve operations and reduce impacts, and that commitment and practice will continue after this public hearing. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 2 of 26 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the public hearing on Autowash’s SUP, City Council is taking quasi-judicial action, not legislative action. The difference between these two functions is important. As a matter of fundamental fairness and due process, City Council’s “exercise of its quasi-judicial authority, unlike legislative authority, is conditioned upon the observance of traditional procedural safeguards against arbitrary governmental action.”1 In addition to the required notice and opportunity to be heard, Autowash also has a right to judicial review of any action taken by City Council that adversely affects its protected right in the SUP if City Council misapplies the law or the record lacks competent evidence to support its decision.2 For all the reasons set forth in this response, Autowash contends that the City has misapplied the special use permit enforcement provision of the Code in this enforcement action and the record lacks competent evidence to support revoking the SUP or imposing additional operational conditions at this time. As described in more detail in Section IV.A below, the City is exceeding its authority under the Code, Chapter 26, Article I, Section 26-114.F., in proceeding with this enforcement action. Although municipalities may be afforded some deference in interpreting their own codes, that deference does not permit an interpretation that conflicts with the plain language of the Code.3 Code Section 26-114.F permits enforcement only where a condition or stipulation has not been adhered to, or where a condition or stipulation has been materially altered in scope, application, or design. The record supports no such finding. The SUP includes five conditions of approval, and neither the City’s Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance dated June 24, 2025 (“First Notice of SUP Noncompliance”) nor the City’s Second Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance and Revocation Hearing dated April 16, 2026 (“Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance,” and together the First Notice of SUP Noncompliance and the Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance are the “Notices of SUP Noncompliance”) identifies any of those conditions as having been violated. Instead, the First Notice of SUP Noncompliance refers generally to “conditions and representations of the Special Use Permit” and identifies “Door Operations” and “Operational Noise Impacts on the Neighborhood” as the asserted noncompliance.4 The Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance similarly does not tie the alleged noncompliance to any specific SUP condition, but instead alleges two determinations for noncompliance (1) that the operation of the Car Wash has resulted in ongoing adverse impacts to the surrounding area related to noise and operational characteristics, and (2) that the Car Wash is “not operating in a manner consistent with the representations and assumptions underlying the SUP approval, including the depiction and 1 Cherry Hills Resort Development Company v. City of Cherry Hills Village, 757 P.2d 622, 625 (Colo. 1988). 2 Whitelaw v. City and County of Denver, 405 P.3d 433, 438 (Colo. App. 2017). 3 O'Connell v. City Council of Denver, 488 P.3d 14, 16-17 (Colo. App. 2019) (courts review municipalities’ interpretations of their codes de novo and “owe no deference to interpretations that are contrary to the provisions’ clear language.”). 4 Ex. A – Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance dated June 24, 2025, at 1-2. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 3 of 26 expected use of enclosed bays” (emphasis added).5 Those allegations make clear that the City is relying on something other than an SUP condition or stipulation as the basis for this enforcement action. Assumptions and expectations are not conditions or stipulations, particularly where Autowash made no representations that could have reasonably led to those assumptions and expectations. Pursuing enforcement action against the SUP on that basis would exceed the City’s authority under the Code and serve as grounds for Autowash to appeal to the District Court. Further, the City’s determinations in the Notices of SUP Noncompliance are arbitrary and capricious because rather than being documented noncompliance with standards in the Code or conditions and stipulations in the SUP, they are generic statements about adverse impacts or based on undocumented assumptions and expectations. If the City believed the Car Wash had to operate in a particular manner to satisfy the SUP approval criteria, the time to say so was during the SUP approval process, and the way to say so was through a written condition or stipulation of approval. That did not happen here. The contemporaneous City review records for the Car Wash entitlements did not identify noise, dryer operation, or bay-door operation as a concern. Instead, those records show that the Site Plan was deemed approvable with no remaining comments or concerns,6 the Site Plan was approved as compliant with Chapter 26,7 and staff recommended approval of the SUP after finding the proposed use satisfied the applicable review criteria.8 The Car Wash is also located in a part of the City where heavy commercial uses transition directly to residential properties with little or no meaningful buffer. That is a difficult transition, but it is an unavoidable outcome as the City approves commercial development and redevelopment along 44th Avenue. Public reporting reflects that the City recently faced a materially similar noise issue involving Silver Bullet Shooting Range, located less than a mile away, and in that matter worked with the business toward mitigation and helped secure more than $33,000 for soundproofing improvements from urban renewal authority funds rather than pursuing permit revocation. Assumptions or expectations that are not made into conditions of approval cannot, under the Code, form the basis for an enforcement action against the SUP. It is arbitrary and capricious to enforce unwritten assumptions and expectations as conditions or stipulations. Until the issuance of the First Notice of SUP Noncompliance, Autowash had no notice of the City’s alleged assumptions and expectations concerning bay-door operations at the Car Wash. By then, the City had already approved the SUP, Site Plan, and a related subdivision application, issued the building permit, and issued the certificate of occupancy for the Car Wash. Autowash had also invested more than $5,500,000 redeveloping the Car Wash property from a condition of blight in good faith reliance on those approvals from the City. The City did not provide with the Notices 5 Ex. B – Second Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance and Revocation Hearing dated April 16, 2026, page 3. 6 Ex. PP – May 6, 2024 Letter from Alayna Olivas-Loera to Christian Tidwell, re: Autowash Site Plan and CDs Approval. 7 Ex. QQ – Approval of Site Plan dated July 5, 2024. 8 Ex. RR – January 16, 2024 Memorandum from Alayna Olivas-Loera to Lauren Mikulak, re: SUP-23-01/Autowash Lakeside. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 4 of 26 of SUP Noncompliance any contemporaneous record showing that its alleged assumptions or expectations were ever expressed during the approval process or incorporated into the SUP or that Autowash caused those assumptions or expectations in any way that could be reasonably anticipated. The record demonstrates the opposite is true. When the City reviewed its own files related to the SUP after receiving a noise complaint in March 2025, the City planner assigned to reviewing and processing the SUP for the Car Wash concluded that there was not “anything specific in there about noise – I think because the use itself wasn’t changed, we didn’t call it out specifically.”9 Around that same time, after reviewing the SUP files in response to an email from the Community Services Team Supervisor of the Wheat Ridge Police Department recommending that the Car Wash would need to operate with the bay doors closed to reduce sound, the Community Development Director wrote that “the plans include garage doors on both sides of all bays” thus “if [Autowash] is not willing to close the doors for all bays for all washes, we’ll have to look at restricting their hours through the SUP process.”10 Based on the competent evidence in the record, the assumption and expectation that the Car Wash would operate with all bay doors closed throughout the entire wash cycle appeared at the time the City started receiving noise complaints. The City has no competent evidence to document its assumptions and expectations about Car Wash operational conditions from the time the SUP and other entitlements for the Car Wash were approved. The City cannot now enforce an unwritten, post hoc assumption or expectation as though it were a written condition or stipulation of approval. The record also does not support the City’s stated basis for its assumptions and expectations about Car Wash operations. The Notices of SUP Noncompliance rely on architectural elevation drawings that depict the Car Wash bay doors in the closed position to infer that Autowash represented that the doors would be closed throughout all phases of the wash cycle.11 But architectural elevations are submitted to satisfy the Code’s site plan requirements for façade review12 – detailed elevations for each façade, proposed materials and colors, transparent areas, and building dimensions – not to establish a plan of operations. As the Car Wash architect explains, the elevations were submitted to demonstrate compliance with the City’s Architectural and Site Design Manual by showing the proposed finishes, transparency, façade, and other elements of the building.13 9 Ex. LL – Email chain between Alayna Olivas-Loera and Jana Easley dated March 7-10, 2025 at pg. 1. 10 Ex. OO – Email chain between City staff dated March 7, 2025 – March 11, 2025 at pg. 1. 11 Ex. A at 1; Ex. B at 3. 12 Code, Chapter 26, Article I, Sections 26-111.D.2(b) through (f) (requiring architectural elevations showing each façade, materials and colors, transparent areas, building dimensions, and accessory appurtenances). 13 Ex. C - Letter from James T. Kirschman, Hover Architecture, dated May 4, 2026 (explaining that elevations were submitted to show compliance with the Architectural and Site Design Manual; that doors must be shown closed to depict proposed design elements; that he found no Code provision prohibiting overhead doors from remaining open during operation; no discussion in submittals, City comments, or project emails regarding door position while a car was in the bay; and that any operational restriction ordinarily would have been put in writing). Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 5 of 26 To demonstrate that compliance, overhead doors had to be shown in the closed position; showing them open would suggest that no door was proposed and would prevent the City from reviewing the appearance and materials of that element of the building.14 The architect further confirms that, in reviewing the Code, the application materials, City comments, and project emails, he found no prohibition on overhead doors remaining open during operation, no discussion of door position while a vehicle was in the bay or the wash was otherwise in use, and no evidence that the City identified that issue during its review of the SUP application materials for the Car Wash.15 If the City intended to impose an operational restriction of that kind, the only way to do so was in writing as a condition or stipulation of approval on the SUP. It did not do so. Additionally, the City’s assumption that the Car Wash would operate with the bay doors closed year-round is inconsistent with ordinary car wash operations and unreasonable. As explained in the enclosed car wash industry expert letter, doors on car wash buildings in colder climates are generally used as seasonal freeze-protection measures, not as year-round operational containment systems.16 In Colorado, car wash bay doors are typically closed only during freezing or sub-freezing conditions and remain open during warmer months as a matter of standard practice.17 The car wash expert further explains that continuous closed-door operation during warm weather is not typical or operationally advisable because it can create excessive heat, humidity, corrosion risk, and premature equipment failure.18 Against that backdrop, it was unreasonable for the City to treat architectural elevations showing the doors in the closed position as a commitment that the facility would operate that way at all times (if the City in fact formed that assumption and expectation before approving the SUP). If the City intended to require closed-door operation as a condition of approval, the only way to do so was in writing as a condition or stipulation of approval on the SUP. But again, it did not. Finally, the Code provides a separate process for protecting public peace under Chapter 16. The Notices of SUP Noncompliance determined that noise from the Car Wash was adversely impacting the surrounding area. The City’s noise ordinance, codified at Section 16-103 of the Code, is specifically designed for noise enforcement. To the extent that the City believes it must address noise generated by the Car Wash, the Code mandates that unreasonable noise be addressed through enforcement of the City’s noise ordinance where the prescribed enforcement mechanisms are clearly defined and the applicable noise standards can be found. The Code does not permit the City to convert a noise complaint into a special use permit enforcement action particularly where, as here, the SUP contains no condition or stipulation specifically requiring compliance with the noise ordinance. There are distinctly separate standards, procedures, hearing procedures, deciding bodies, penalties, and remedies available under Chapter 16 and Chapter 26. A violation under Chapter 16 is not per se a violation of 14 Id. 15 Id. 16 Ex. D - Letter from Aaron Voorhees, ASLAN Design Management Inc., dated April 30, 2026. 17 Id. 18 Id. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 6 of 26 Chapter 26, and the City should follow the appropriate process in its enforcement. Additionally, any citizen in the City who claims to have been impacted by the Car Wash is not without a remedy. For instance, such individual may bring a nuisance action in the district court to abate and prevent such nuisances.19 Equally important, the City has not applied a consistent noise standard to the Car Wash. At different stages of this matter, the City treated the applicable standard as purely subjective and contextual under the SUP,20 pursued a municipal noise violation enforcement case in municipal court using identified Wheat Ridge limits of 65 dBA during the day and 60 dBA at night,21 worked towards mitigation with Autowash and its sound consultant using City-identified numerical targets from the municipal code,22 and then shifted again in the City’s own sound study to a distorted misapplication of the noise limits in C.R.S. § 25-12-103.23 As explained below, the City’s sound study did not properly apply the process under the state statute. This is a significant due process problem. Even Commander Lucas Hunt, Patrol Operations Division, Wheat Ridge Police Department, had concerns “about the enforcement of city code using vague or third-party information that contradicts the reading [sic] we have taken.”24 Since the Car Wash reopened in fall 2025, the Wheat Ridge Police took sound measurements at various locations on and around the Car Wash property on December 9, 2025, November 19, 2025, and November 18, 2025.25 The Wheat Ridge Police did not issue any citations based on their readings and expressed concerns with relying on readings by any other third-party for enforcement actions when such readings conflict with the readings taken by police officers. Before the City seeks consequences as severe as SUP revocation or adoption of new SUP conditions, fundamental fairness requires fair notice of the standard being enforced and a consistent method of enforcement. On this record, Autowash has not been given either. City Council must decide this matter based on the standard of review for special use permit enforcement under the Code and the evidence in the record. This is not a legislative action 19 C.R.S. § 24-12-104. 20 See Ex. EE - May 6, 2025 Email from Lauren Mikulak regarding City Noise Standards (noting the noise standard applied to the Car Wash is “inherently subjective”). 21 See Ex. CC – Notice of Violation dated March 2025 (citing the City’s 65 dBA daytime and 60 dBA nighttime noise ordinance standards as the applicable standards). 22 See Ex. S – Wave Engineering Acoustical Report dated September 19, 2025 (relying on the numerical noise standards from the City’s noise ordinance based on the zoning of the receptor property); Ex. MM – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and residents dated September 25, 2025 – December 8, 2025 at pg. 5. 23 See Ex. BB – Revised EDI Sound Study dated April 5, 2026 (using the state noise statute’s numerical standards due to the lack of numerical limits in the City code, but not following the state statute’s requirements regarding testing methodologies and applying the incorrect numerical limits based on receptor property classification rather than the generating property’s classification). 24 Ex. JJ – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and Marie Trujillo dated November 11, 2025 – December 10, 2025 at pg. 3 and 5. 25 Id. at 1. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 7 of 26 where City Council may act freely to achieve a desired public policy, political promise, or permanent outcome. The Code is clear that special use permit enforcement is triggered by noncompliance with a written condition or stipulation of the underlying permit. The City has failed to meet that threshold standard with the determinations described in the Notices of SUP Noncompliance. Further, there is no competent evidence in the record to support a good faith argument that the City’s determinations warrant revocation of, or additional conditions on, the SUP. The purpose of this quasi-judicial hearing is to afford Autowash due process with respect to its protected rights in the SUP and the Car Wash, and the City must apply the law as written and the facts as they have been presented. II. INTRODUCTION The central issue in this matter is whether the City can revoke or modify an approved special use permit based on generic statements about adverse impacts and an unwritten operational restriction arising from the City’s unreasonable assumptions and expectations that were never stated in the application materials and never imposed as a condition of approval. The record reflects a redevelopment project that went through the required City process, received SUP and Site Plan approval, obtained building permits, completed construction, received a certificate of occupancy, and proceeded to open for business in good faith reliance on the City’s numerous approvals. After opening and receiving the First Notice of SUP Noncompliance, the Car Wash was closed, sound testing was performed in accordance with City staff’s instructions for testing at specified locations,26 mitigation measures were installed with Staff’s approval,27 the Car Wash was retested by a sound engineer in accordance with City staff’s instructions for testing at specified locations,28 and the Car Wash reopened subject to voluntary operational limitations that were vetted and approved by Staff.29 The record does not show any express or implied representation or condition requiring the wash-bay doors to remain closed throughout operation, any condition of approval requiring that result, or any issue raised during the review process by the City or the public on that point. Instead, this matter arises from the City’s after- 26 See Ex. E – Email from Jana Easley, Planning Manager, to Jeff Kwolkoski, Erin Dreeszen, and Dennis Dreeszen, dated June 9, 2025, re: proposed sound-reading locations for the Lakeside Autowash sound study (transmitting map with complaint locations and proposing three additional sound-reading locations). 27 See Ex. F – Letter from John Peckler to Lauren Mikulak and Gerald Dahl, dated Sept. 26, 2025, re: Response to Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash – SUP-23-01 – 5900 W. 44th Avenue (proposing construction of sound fence); and Ex. G – Letter from Lauren Mikulak to John Peckler and Autowash Team, dated Sept. 30, 2025, re: Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash (re: City’s approval of proposed sound fence). 28 See Ex. G (noting Autowash’s commitment to retest the site after installation of the sound fence using the same methodology as the initial sound study); see also Ex. H – Email chain re Lakeside Autowash Follow Up Sound Study and Reopening Post Fence Installation; and Ex. I – Updated Test Results (Autowash) Wave #3441A, dated Nov. 6, 2025. 29 See Ex. FF – Sept. 30, 2025 Letter from City Approving Installation of Sound Fence, page 1. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 8 of 26 the-fact effort to treat architectural elevations showing wash-bays with garage doors in the closed position as a binding operational commitment. The record does not support that reading. Therefore, Autowash respectfully requests that the City Council find that no condition or stipulation of SUP-23-01 has been violated and, on that basis, decline to revoke or impose additional conditions on the SUP. Autowash welcomes further data-driven recommendations from City County, City staff, or other stakeholders regarding strategies and opportunities for improving Car Wash operations and mitigating potential impacts, which Autowash will address and consider outside of this enforcement action as a responsible business in the community. III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. Redevelopment and City Permitting History Before the City approved redevelopment of 5900 W. 44th Avenue, the project went through the full City review process over roughly two years. The process began with pre- application review in July 2022 and continued through a required neighborhood meeting, concurrent Site Plan, SUP, and related subdivision plat review, Community Development Director approval of the Site Plan, SUP, and plat, building permit review and approvals, and issuance of a certificate of occupancy.30 The application materials and approval record for the Car Wash do not show any representation that the wash-bay doors would remain closed during all phases of the wash cycle, and at no point in any of the approvals for the Car Wash did the City impose a condition requiring that result.31 The later Site Plan and SUP approval records confirm that the City approved or recommended approval of the project without identifying noise, dryer operation, or bay-door operation as an unresolved issue.32 The Car Wash property had long operated as a carwash before Autowash acquired that parcel. Consistent with that existing use, the City’s pre-application summary described the proposal as demolition of the old carwash and construction of a new four-bay automated carwash with an office.33 Autowash’s SUP application materials likewise described the project as demolition of the existing self-service carwash to make way for a new automated car wash with four bays.34 At the July 14, 2022 pre-application meeting on the Car Wash permits, City staff 30 Ex. J – Pre-Application Meeting Summary dated July 14, 2022, pages 1-3; Ex. K – Neighborhood Meeting Notice; Ex. L – City of Wheat Ridge Approval Letter dated June 27, 2024; Ex. M – Special Use Permit Approval dated January 16, 2024; Ex. N – Building Permit No. 202400776; Ex. O – Certificate of Occupancy. 31 Ex. P – Land Use Case Processing Application dated February 9, 2023; Ex. Q – Project Narrative dated February 10, 2023; Ex. M. 32 See Ex. PP – May 6, 2024 Letter from Alayna Olivas-Loera to Christian Tidwell, re: Autowash Site Plan and CDs Approval; Ex. QQ – Approval of Site Plan dated July 5, 2024; and Ex. RR – January 16, 2024 Memorandum from Alayna Olivas-Loera to Lauren Mikulak, re: SUP-23- 01/Autowash Lakeside. 33 Ex. J at 1. 34 Ex. P; Ex. Q at 1. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 9 of 26 advised that, because full redevelopment was proposed, both a special use permit and site plan approval would be required and could proceed concurrently.35 Staff’s pre-application comments addressed zoning, frontage, screening, landscaping, utilities, and public improvements.36 They did not identify any issues regarding bay-door design or operation, or suggest that approval would depend on operating the Car Wash with closed bay doors.37 That remained true through final site-plan review; in May 2024, City staff advised that the most recent site plan and civil construction document submittal had “no remaining comments or concerns” and was considered approvable.38 Before formal application submittal, Autowash completed the required neighborhood meeting process. The neighborhood meeting notice for the Car Wash described the proposal as a request to “rebuild/refresh the existing car wash into a new automated car wash.”39 The City later acknowledged that the project proceeded through neighborhood outreach, public notice, and multiple rounds of review, and that no public comments on the Car Wash were received during the formal notice period.40 The Car Wash application materials consistently described the project as redevelopment of the existing self-service car wash into a new automatic four-bay car wash. The land use application stated that the project “includes the demolition of a current self-service car wash to make way for a new automatic car wash with four bays,” and the project narrative used materially the same description.41 The narrative further explained that vehicles would enter from West 44th Avenue, proceed to the south side of the building to access the pay stations and wash bays, and exit back onto West 44th after passing through the wash.42 It also described a 3,539 square foot building consisting of “four automatic wash bays, 2 on each side of an equipment room.”43 Nothing in the SUP application materials said the wash would operate with the bay doors closed at all times. The same is true of the Site Plan application materials. While the architectural elevations showed the bay doors in the closed position, those drawings depicted the proposed appearance, materials, and configuration of the building in accordance with the site plan submittal requirements under the Code,44 including the façade design elements the City was required to review, not a statement that the facility would operate with the doors closed throughout every 35 Ex. J at 2. 36 Id. 37 Id. 38 Ex. PP. 39 Ex. K. 40 Ex. B at 1-2. 41 Ex. P; Ex. Q at 1. 42 Ex. Q at 1. 43 Id. 44 Code, Chapter 26, Article I, Sections 26-111.D.2(a) through (f). Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 10 of 26 phase of the wash cycle.45 As the project architect explains, that is true of elevations drawings generally, not just here.46 Exterior elevations are prepared to illustrate the proposed design, materials, colors, finishes, transparency, and screening of the building’s façade elements.47 For overhead doors, that means showing them in the closed position so the reviewing jurisdiction can evaluate the doors themselves as part of the façade. Showing the doors open would suggest that no doors were proposed and therefore no doors were being submitted for approval.48 The architect further states he found no City comment, code provision, or project correspondence indicating that a closed-door operation was required or even discussed during the approval process.49 He also explains that, in his substantial experience designing and permitting car washes, where a jurisdiction intends to impose an operational restriction, that restriction is put in writing.50 That did not occur here. The contemporaneous Site Plan application materials described a four-bay automatic car wash with vehicles entering from West 44th Avenue, proceeding to the south side of the building to access the pay stations and wash bays, stacking along the south side, and then exiting back onto West 44th Avenue after passing through the wash.51 Read together, those materials describe the design and circulation of the proposed facility. They do not convert architectural elevations showing closed doors into a binding commitment that the doors would remain closed throughout operation. They instead depict a through-bay automatic car wash whose operation necessarily contemplated vehicle entry, movement, and exit through the bays. That conclusion is further confirmed by the later technical record from both sides, which describes the wash cycle as including an initial undercarriage/entry phase with the south doors open52 and a drying phase with the doors open.53 45 Ex. R – Site Plan and Construction Documents for Autowash Lakeside, architectural elevation sheets, Sheets A0-1 (Architectural Cover Sheet), A3-1 and A3-2 (Exterior Elevations), and A4-1 (Building Sections); see also Ex. B at 1 (stating that the SUP application materials, including architectural elevations, depicted a facility with doors on both sides of each bay, consistently shown in the closed position). 46 Ex. C. 47 Id. 48 Id. 49 Id. 50 Id. 51 See Ex. R (showing the proposed building, south-side stacking lanes, pay station area, and drive- through circulation pattern). 52 As the undercarriage wash/entry phase occurs as a vehicle drives into the bay, the entry door must necessarily be open during that phase. 53 See Ex. S – Wave Engineering Acoustical Report dated September 19, 2025, page 5 (stating that the south bay door was open as the car drove in during the undercarriage wash and that the north bay door was open during the entire cycle tested); see also, Ex. T – Engineering Dynamics Sound Level Measurement Results dated March 24, 2026, pages 2-3 (describing the wash cycle as including an initial vehicle entry/pre-wash undercarriage phase with the south doors open and Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 11 of 26 On January 16, 2024, the City approved the SUP administratively after finding that the special use would not have a detrimental effect on persons residing or working in the neighborhood, would not create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing zoning, and was appropriately designed and compatible with the surrounding area.54 The conditions of approval were limited. The staff memo supporting approval did not identify noise, dryer operation, or bay-door operation as a concern or condition.55 The conditions required consistency with the representations depicted in the application materials, consistency with the SUP site plan and elevations, issuance of a building permit, operator-specific approval, and execution of a public improvement agreement.56 The conditions did not include any express requirement governing bay-door operations, any express noise condition, any dryer-specific restriction, or any requirement that the doors remain closed throughout the wash cycle.57 If the City believed closed-door operation throughout the full wash cycle was necessary to satisfy the SUP review criteria, the Code gave it authority to impose such an operational condition. It did not do so here. On June 27, 2024, the City confirmed approval of the Site Plan, SUP, and subdivision plat applications.58 The signed Site Plan approval separately approved WSP-20-01 after finding that the Site Plan complied with Chapter 26, and its conditions were limited to plat approval, the improvement agreement, building-permit issuance, and consistency between the building-permit submittals and the Site Plan.59 The later permitting history confirms that this project was not merely approved in concept – it was permitted, built, and used in good faith reliance on the City’s three approvals. After issuing land use approvals, the City issued Building Permit No. 202400776 on July 3, 2024 for a “New Commercial Building for Lakeside Autowash” including “4 automatic wash bays, 1 equipment room, and 1 employee restroom,” approved per the plans and zoning cases WSP-23- 01, SUP-23-01, and MS-24-04.60 The City then issued a certificate of occupancy on February 10, 2025 stating that the building and use complied with the City’s building, zoning, and related land use laws and could be occupied, with “Limitations/Stipulations: None.”61 Under Wheat Ridge’s vested-rights provision, site plan or SUP approval alone does not create a vested right, but a vested property right may arise after a building, grading, or fill permit has been lawfully issued and the permit holder has taken lawful, reasonable, and substantial steps and incurred substantial expenses in justifiable reliance on that approval or permit.62 That sequence matters because it shows the City approved a standard four-bay automatic car wash, permitted it to be constructed, north doors closed, a spray and wash phase with both sides closed, and drying operations with both sides open). 54 Ex. M. 55 Ex. RR. 56 Id. 57 Id. 58 Ex. L. 59 Ex. QQ. 60 Ex. N. 61 Ex. O. 62 Code, Chapter 26, Article I, Section 26-121. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 12 of 26 and then authorized occupancy and operation without any stated limitation requiring closed-door operations. The City’s determination that its undocumented assumptions and expectations have been breached cannot be reconciled with the actual function of the approved facility. As noted in the letter provided by a third-party car wash industry expert, ASLAN Design Management Inc.,63 the industry standard for car washes in Colorado and nationally is to operate with bay doors open except in freezing or sub-freezing conditions. The bay doors are closed in freezing or sub-freezing conditions to prevent freezing of equipment and plumbing and to maintain minimum indoor temperatures necessary for mechanical systems64. Additionally, operating a car wash with the wash-bay doors closed during warmer temperatures can create excessive heat and moisture to the point of corrosion risk and premature equipment failures, which poses a safety risk for the car wash and its customers.65 This Car Wash was designed and operates as a standard automatic car wash, consistent with ordinary industry practice in Colorado and in the basic manner in which automatic car washes commonly operate in Wheat Ridge and the greater Denver metro area.66 Thus, the City’s undocumented assumptions and expectations that architectural elevations showing garage doors in the closed position create an operational commitment are inconsistent with industry standards and best practices for car washes. B. Good-Faith mitigation efforts and the unresolved technical records. This is also not a case in which Autowash ignored noise complaints or refused to act. The record shows the opposite: Autowash implemented substantial operational changes and mitigation measures that resulted in a documented reduction in noise at receiving properties to the south of the Car Wash. After the Car Wash opened in February 2025 and the City reported that it began receiving noise complaints, Autowash engaged with City staff, responded to the City’s requests, undertook mitigation work, retained an acoustical consultant, voluntarily shut down operations for an extended period, installed a sound fence, reopened under reduced conditions, and continued participating in the City’s technical review of noise impacts through spring 2026. As discussed below, that process showed significant progress, but the City ended it before the technical review was complete.67 It was not until April 29, 2026, 13 days after Autowash’s receipt of the Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance, that Autowash received a final copy of the City’s sound study dated April 5, 2026. And only after Autowash submitted a Colorado Open Records Request for public records related to this enforcement case did City staff remember to turn over the final copy of the City’s sound study. Autowash and the City had been working collaboratively to evaluate noise from the Car Wash and what additional mitigation 63 Ex. D. 64 Id. 65 Id. 66 Id. 67 See Ex. B at 1-3 (describing staff outreach, voluntary compliance efforts, technical study, facilitated dialogue, the 90-day closure, the commissioned sound study, coordination on design solutions and operational changes, installation of the six-foot fence/wall, and reopening under limited hours and limited operations). Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 13 of 26 measures might be available. As further discussed below, Autowash commented on the City’s initial draft sound study, and City staff acknowledged that they had similar questions and concerns and had requested further corrections and clarifications. Nevertheless, the City had an updated sound study on April 5, 2026, withheld that study from Autowash for 24 days, and in the interim issued the Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance and set the matter for the May 18, 2026, revocation hearing.68 The City’s investigation of noise impacts began with police responses and field measurements at and near the site. The earliest police record in the file does not describe a violation. On February 26, 2025, a City officer observed the site for approximately sixteen minutes, from 11:14 p.m. to 11:33 p.m., while one bay was in use and did not observe any unusually loud noise.69 On March 9, 2025, the same officer returned and recorded decibel readings during various stages of the wash and dry cycle ranging from 61 dBA to 85.4 dBA.70 On March 11, 2025, the officer then recorded readings from nearby properties that ranged from 47 to 57 dBA at the front setback of 4360 Gray Street, with a reading of 62.4 dBA when a dryer came on, approximately 46 to 48 dBA in the backyard of 4360 Gray Street, approximately 66 to 74 dBA while approaching 4355 Gray Street with one bay operating and a dryer running, approximately 53 to 57 dBA from the middle of the 4355 Gray Street yard with one vacuum running, and approximately 63 dBA at the fence line with one bay operating and one vacuum running.71 The police department’s sound measurements should be viewed in context. Unlike the later acoustical studies, the police testing did not include any documented baseline measurement of ambient sound conditions at the measurement locations, any correction for traffic noise, or any sustained methodology designed to separate carwash noise from background sound sources. In response to those field observations and follow-up discussions with City personnel, Autowash began implementing sound-reduction measures and continued doing so in coordination with the City over the months that followed. The police reports reflect direct communication with ownership and on-site personnel in March 2025 regarding possible sound- reduction measures, and on April 3, 2025, City staff met in person with Dennis and Erin Dreeszen regarding the ongoing investigation and operational changes and the work being performed at the site.72 Over the course of this process, Autowash has incurred approximately $154,000 in hard costs related to installing mitigation measures and upgrading equipment, which amount includes substantial sums expended on physical improvements and technical work intended to reduce sound, including installing sound-dampening panels in the south-side bay doors, keeping the south-side bay doors closed during the entire wash cycle, installing sound-dampening material in the vacuum domes, retaining Wave Engineering (“Wave”) to conduct an acoustical study, and 68 See Ex. U at page 1 (stating that the City had “similar questions” and had “requested corrections and clarifications before finalizing the report”) 69 Ex. V – Wheat Ridge Police Department Incident Officer Reports/General Reports, at page 1. 70 Id. 71 Id. at 1-2. 72 Id. at 4-5. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 14 of 26 constructing a sound fence along the south property line, and suffered an estimated $212,000 in lost revenues from the various voluntary closures.73 Autowash also made operational changes as the process continued, including reduced hours of operation (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) from what was approved in the SUP, deactivation of the southernmost vacuum, deactivation of the easternmost wash bay, and other adjustments to equipment intended to lessen sound impacts while the City’s review remained ongoing. By June 2025, Autowash had reported to the City that those mitigation efforts included hiring Wave, restricting hours to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., installing sound-dampening panels inside the south entry bay doors, installing sound-dampening material in the vacuums, and modifying the equipment to keep the south entry bay doors closed through the wash and dry cycle.74 The police record also reflects improvement over time as those changes were being implemented. On April 16, 2025, after the south-side doors had been adjusted to close automatically during the wash cycle, sound matting had been installed in the south bay doors of the west bays, and Autowash had turned off the southernmost vacuum, officers reported that at the southeast corner of the property the highest reading was approximately 70 dBA for about one second as a vehicle entered the wash, but that the average reading was approximately 54 dBA after the doors shut, with passing traffic on W. 44th Avenue periodically pushing readings into the 60 dBA range, and as high as 69 dBA, while the carwash was not operating.75 Most significantly, from the backyard of the commercial property at 4355 Gray Street, the officer measured readings of approximately 49 dBA along the north fence line and approximately 47 dBA at both the midpoint and south end of the yard, and reported that at those latter locations they could “barely hear the car wash operating.”76 In other words, by mid-April 2025, the City’s own officers were already documenting that at 4355 Gray Street – the commercial property immediately south of the site – the carwash was barely audible in portions of the yard and traffic on W. 44th Avenue was independently generating more noise at the site than the carwash. On April 22, 2025, the Police Department reported that, based on all officer readings taken during various hours of the day and night, the property at 5900 W. 44th Avenue was within the allowed decibel limits for both daytime and nighttime operations.77 Despite that finding, the City issued the First Notice of SUP Noncompliance on June 24, 2025. That notice asserted noncompliance based on door operations and required, among other things, modified hours, evidence of a signed sound study contract, removal of 24-hour signage, full closure of entry and exit doors during operation, disabling dryers pending completion of the sound study and mitigation, submission of sound monitoring data, production of point-of-sale data, and an updated operational summary, with a draft sound study due by August 15, 2025.78 73 See Ex. B at 1-3 74 Ex. W – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and John Peckler, dated June 17–20, 2025, re: Lakeside Autowash Operating Conditions and Noise Mitigation Measures. 75 Ex. V at 16. 76 Id.; see also Ex. X - Officer DeNoto BWC Footage dated April 16, 2025, at 6 minutes to end. 77 Ex. V at 13. 78 Ex. A at 1-3. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 15 of 26 It was and continues to be Autowash’s position that the First Notice of SUP Noncompliance failed to demonstrate a basis for bringing an enforcement action under the Code for the reasons stated in this response.79 Nevertheless, Autowash responded to the City’s First Notice of SUP Noncompliance by offering an alternative means to collect data and assess opportunities for mitigation, including implementing a voluntary 90-day closure while a sound study could be performed and mitigation measures evaluated.80 During that voluntary closure, Autowash retained Wave, continued coordinating with City staff on operational changes and design solutions, and evaluated construction of a sound fence along the south property line.81 Wave conducted field measurements from July 14 to July 16, 2025 at locations including the three locations required by City staff82 and issued its first report on September 19, 2025.83 Wave measured both ambient sound and carwash equipment noise, including at the three locations selected by City staff. It found that ambient sound in the area – driven largely by traffic on W. 44th Avenue, N. Harlan Street, and surrounding streets – generally ranged from 55 to 60 dBA during the day and 44 to 50 dBA at night, with quieter nighttime lulls as low as 40 dBA.84 Wave’s spot measurements at the locations selected by City staff showed that, depending on the location and the number of vacuums or dryers operating, equipment sound in the neighborhood was often within or only slightly above those ambient conditions.85 Wave then used the sound measurements to develop a predictive model and concluded that a six-foot airtight sound fence along the south property line, with an effective height of approximately eight feet because of site grading, would reduce sound sufficiently to meet Wheat Ridge’s applicable daytime noise limits with all four bays operating and its applicable nighttime noise limits if only the two westernmost bays operated.86 Autowash provided the City with a copy of the Wave sound study on September 19, 2025. Autowash and City staff met on September 25, 2025, to discuss the results of the Wave sound study and the proposed mitigation measure including the sound fence at the southern edge of the property. During the meeting, Autowash committed to installing a six-foot sound fence meeting the design and material requirements described in Wave’s sound study. After the meeting, Autowash provided the City with preliminary drawings showing the general design and materials that would be used for the sound fence, and the City’s Building Division confirmed that the sound fence fell under the City’s building permit exemption for six-foot fences. In a letter dated September 26, 2025, Autowash confirmed that voluntary closure of the Car Wash would remain in effect until the sound fence was installed.87 Once the sound fence was installed, the Car Wash would operate between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., and Wave would retest noise 79 Ex. Y - Autowash Response to First Notice of Noncompliance, June 25, 2025. 80 See id. 81 See Ex. B at 2-3. 82 See Ex. E. 83 Ex. S. 84 Ex. S at 1-3. 85 Id., pages 1-3, 6, and 8-9. 86 Id., pages 6-9. 87 Ex. F. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 16 of 26 from the Car Wash to confirm that the sound fence was performing as intended. In a letter dated September 30, 2025, City staff accepted the proposed process and voluntary operating limits for reopening the Car Wash.88 Autowash then proceeded with installing the sound fence Wave recommended. The sound fence was installed along the south property line on November 1, 2025.89 Wave returned to the Car Wash on November 5, 2025 to evaluate conditions with the sound fence installed. In its November 6, 2025 follow-up report, Wave provided sound measurements of both background sound and background-corrected equipment sound at the south property line and at three off-site neighborhood locations previously selected by the City for points of comparison with the initial sound study.90 With two dryers and three vacuums operating, Wave reported background-corrected equipment levels of 53 dBA at the south property line and 47 to 53 dBA at the neighborhood locations.91 With three dryers and three vacuums operating, the reported levels were 56 dBA at the south property line and 48 to 56 dBA in the neighborhood. With all four dryers and three vacuums running simultaneously, Wave reported 62 dBA at the south property line and 52 to 60 dBA at the neighborhood locations.92 City staff then authorized the Car Wash to reopen, and Autowash voluntarily agreed to temporarily impose modified operating hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and operate only three of the four wash bays until sound could be further mitigated to comply with the City’s noise ordinance.93 The City continued investigating after Autowash reopened under the modified temporary conditions that had been approved by the City. On November 18, November 19, and December 10 Wheat Ridge police officers took multiple sound readings from on and around the Car Wash. 94 The City took no enforcement action at that time based on those readings. By December 2025, Ms. Mikulak reported to Autowash that City code-enforcement personnel had taken periodic readings at various property-line and neighborhood locations and that she had no concerns at that time with those readings.95 Even so, she advised that Council wanted additional third-party sound readings and that the City would retain its own sound consultant to conduct them. Autowash again cooperated with that process, granting access to the Car Wash for the City’s sound study and providing operational support. The City ultimately retained Engineering Dynamics, Inc. (“EDI”) to conduct the City’s study. The City requested Autowash staff to be present for EDI’s testing to test all different operational scenarios and build baseline data from which the City and Autowash could evaluate what, if any, mitigation might be of further benefit. City staff, EDI, members of the community, and representatives from Autowash were all on site 88 Id. 89 See Ex. I. 90 Id., pages 2-3. 91 Id., page 3. 92 Id. 93 Ex. Z – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and John Peckler dated December 8–10, 2025, re: Current Carwash Operations. 94 Ex. JJ – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and Marie Trujillo dated November 11, 2025 – December 10,2025 at pages 1 and 5. 95 Id. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 17 of 26 on February 6, 2026, to complete the comprehensive sound testing. However, a customer damaged the Car Wash that morning and the testing could not be completed that day. Instead of giving notice to Autowash and the community and rescheduling for a day when a comprehensive assessment of the Car Wash could be completed with the interested parties present, the City and EDI took measurements on March 10 and March 18, 2026, when Autowash representatives were not present to test the different operational scenarios as promised by the City. The City shared the draft EDI report with Autowash on March 24, 2026.96 Autowash reviewed the draft report and provided written comments on April 3 and April 7, 2026, identifying several issues, including the use of the state noise statute rather than the City’s own noise ordinance, the mistaken classification of 4355 Gray Street as a residential property rather than a commercial property, the lack of detail regarding the operational scenarios and duration of the reported sound ranges, and the lack of support for EDI’s criticism of the sound fence.97 On April 9, 2026, Ms. Mikulak responded that the City had “similar questions” and had “requested corrections and clarifications before finalizing the report.”98 As described above, it was not until April 29, 2026, 13 days after Autowash’s receipt of the Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance, that Autowash received a final copy of the City’s sound study dated April 5, 2026.99 Autowash was not given an opportunity to discuss EDI’s findings with City staff before this public hearing. EDI’s report lacks sufficient details about its methodology to meet the requirements of the sound monitoring data that the City required from Autowash in the First Notice of SUP Noncompliance.100 It should also be noted that in accordance with C.R.S. § 25-12-103(8) measurements with sound level meters must be made when the wind velocity is less than 5 miles per hour. Weather data from March 18, 2026 indicates that winds during the testing window exceeded five miles per hour. According to Wave, when the wind speed is ten miles per hour or higher, which it may have been at times on March 18, 2026 it can create noise blowing across the microphone. EDI was well aware of the potential impacts to noise test results from wind in communications with City staff noting that measurements should be taken on “a day with little or no wind, and mild temperatures (above 50F).”101 It also raises the background noise level when there is blowing grass or leaves. EDI’s report does not address wind conditions on the day of testing or how wind was managed. Before the technical review process was resolved and the parties had a reliable set of data on which to make decisions, the City issued its Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance and set this matter for the May 18 revocation hearing.102 96 Ex. U; see also Ex. T. 97 Id. 98 Id. 99 Ex. AA – April 29, 2026 Email from Lauren Mikulak transmitting Revised EDI Sound Study; Ex. BB – Revised EDI Sound Study dated April 5, 2026. 100 For example, EDI’s report does not distinguish in the data the various operating scenarios (e.g., one bay vs. multiple bays); See Ex. T and Ex. BB. 101 Ex. NN – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and Stuart McGregor dated December 4, 2025 – February 4, 2026 at 3. 102 See Ex. B. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 18 of 26 IV. LEGAL ARGUMENT A. No condition or stipulation of the SUP has been violated. Although the initial issuance of an SUP is discretionary, once the SUP is issued, its continued validity is governed by the Code and the conditions and stipulations actually imposed in the permit. The May 18 hearing is therefore not a de novo policy review of whether City Council would approve the Car Wash today. It is an enforcement proceeding under Code Section 26-114.F. That section provides that “[a]ll conditions and stipulations imposed by the community development director or city council shall be maintained during the entire term of the special use.” It further provides that revocation proceedings may be initiated only if those “stipulations or conditions are not adhered to or are found to have been materially altered in scope, application or design.” And the purpose of the revocation hearing is for City Council to hear evidence concerning “the nature and extent of the alleged noncompliance with the conditions of the special use permit.”103 Municipal interpretations of their own code may receive some deference, but no deference is owed to an interpretation that conflicts with the Code’s clear language.104 The threshold issue here is not whether the City should have, in hindsight, imposed different operational requirements on the Car Wash. The question is whether Autowash violated an actual condition or stipulation that was imposed as part of SUP-23-01. As explained below, it did not. The SUP imposed the following five conditions of approval: 1. “The special use shall be consistent with the representations depicted in the application materials.” 2. “The architectural upgrades and site plan modifications shall be consistent with the SUP Site Plan and Elevations.” 3. “A building permit shall be obtained from the Wheat Ridge Building Division to complete all new construction.” 4. “The approval of this special use is granted to the applicant and may not be inherited by subsequent operators.” 103 Code, Chapter 26, Article I, Section 26-114.F; see also id. at Section 26-114.C.5.c (conditions or stipulations imposed by the community development director may include physical design and operational and maintenance considerations and, if not complied with, may be grounds for revocation); and id. at Section 26-114.C.5.e.1 (City Council may impose conditions or stipulations, including physical design and operational and maintenance considerations, and noncompliance with such conditions may be grounds for revocation). 104 O'Connell v. City Council of Denver, 488 P.3d 14, 16-17 (Colo. App. 2019). Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 19 of 26 5. “A Public Improvement Agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of a vertical building permit.”105 The City’s noncompliance theory does not identify a violation of any of these conditions. The first notice asserts: “Door Operations: The SUP application materials depicted bay doors as closed. In practice, the south-facing door have not been consistently closed since opening, and the north door remains open during the wash and dry cycle.”106 It also asserts: “Operational Noise Impacts on the Neighborhood,” and states that “the carwash as proposed in the SUP application has been significantly altered, specifically dryer operations are taking place with doors open during operations.”107 The second notice similarly states that the “operation of the carwash has resulted in ongoing adverse impacts to the surrounding area, particularly related to noise and operational characteristics” and “the facility is not operating in a manner consistent with the representations and assumptions underlying the SUP approval, including the depiction and expected use of enclosed bays.”108 Those allegations do not establish noncompliance with the conditions that were imposed on the Car Wash in the SUP. Condition 1 requires consistency with the representations depicted in the application materials. Autowash satisfied that condition by constructing and operating the approved use: a redeveloped automatic carwash at the same site, with four automatic wash bays, the approved circulation pattern, pay stations, queuing, and related site improvements shown in the application materials. Nothing in those materials stated that the bay doors would remain closed throughout every phase of operation. Condition 2 requires that the “architectural upgrades and site plan modifications” be consistent with the approved site plan and elevations.109 That condition addresses what was built. Autowash satisfied it by constructing the building, garage doors, bay layout, exterior appearance, and site configuration shown on the approved plans and elevations. The City approved a building with garage doors on both sides of the bays, and that is what was built. Condition 3 was satisfied when the City issued Building Permit No. 202400776. Condition 4 has been satisfied because the permit remains with the applicant; there has been no transfer to a subsequent operator. Condition 5 was satisfied. As required by the Public Improvement Agreement, Autowash installed the sidewalk and handicap ramps on the Car Wash property, repaved portions of Gray Street adjacent to the Car Wash property, and installed light poles on a separate meter for the benefit of the City. Each of the conditions imposed in SUP-23- 01 has therefore been satisfied. The City’s theory of noncompliance is thus not tied to any condition imposed in SUP-23- 01. Neither of the Notices of SUP Noncompliance identify a condition requiring closed-door operation throughout the wash cycle. Instead, the Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance merely refers to the “representations and assumptions underlying the SUP approval,” including the “expected use of enclosed bays.” But the City’s undocumented assumptions and expectations, 105 Ex. M at 1-2. 106 Ex. A at 1. 107 Id. 108 Ex. B at 3 (emphasis added). 109 Ex. M; see also Ex. QQ and Ex. RR. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 20 of 26 particularly those that were never expressed by the City or third parties during the review process, are not conditions or stipulations. The approved conditions do not require the bay doors to remain closed throughout operation, do not impose a separate SUP noise standard, do not prohibit dryer operations, and do not require the facility to function as a fully enclosed carwash at all times. Because Code Section 26-114.F applies to conditions and stipulations actually imposed, the threshold for enforcement action thereunder has not been met. Accordingly, the City is exceeding its jurisdiction in this enforcement proceeding and Autowash respectfully requests that the City Council decline to revoke the SUP or impose new conditions. B. The City’s concerns are governed by the noise ordinance, not by SUP- condition enforcement. The City’s stated concerns are about noise from the Car Wash. The First Notice of SUP Noncompliance says so expressly. It identifies “Operational Noise Impacts on the Neighborhood” as a basis for alleged noncompliance and then imposes corrective actions directed at sound, including modified hours, disabling dryers pending further study, submission of sound monitoring data, and retention of a sound consultant. The Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance says so indirectly. It identifies “operation of the carwash has resulted in ongoing adverse impacts to the surrounding area, particularly related to noise and operational characteristics” as a basis for alleged noncompliance. The City’s Code has a provision for regulation and enforcement of unreasonable noise. Code Section 16-103 makes it unlawful to make, continue, cause, permit, or assist in making “any unreasonable noise which, under all of the circumstances presented, would annoy, injure or endanger the comfort, repose or peace of a person of ordinary sensitivities.” If the City’s position is that Autowash is creating unreasonable noise, Code Section 16-103 is the provision that addresses that issue and provides the appropriate avenue for resolving the City’s concern. Any concerns that the Car Wash is generating unreasonable noise under Code Section 16- 103 should be adjudicated in municipal court under the noise ordinance itself, with a judicial officer deciding the alleged violation subject to Autowash’s right to a trial. The Code does not permit the City to convert a noise complaint into a special use permit enforcement action. There are distinctly separate standards, procedures, hearing procedures, deciding bodies, penalties, and remedies available under Chapter 16 and Chapter 26. A violation under Chapter 16 is not per se a violation of Chapter 26, and the City should follow the appropriate process in its enforcement. The City in fact started down that path by issuing a notice of violation and summons under Code Section 16-103 before shifting to SUP enforcement.110 On this record, using Code Section 26-114.F to litigate a disputed noise case through potential permit revocation is not the proper substitute for proving a noise violation under the ordinance that directly governs that subject matter. Proceeding in the manner the City is now pursuing thus violates Autowash’s due process rights under the United States and Colorado Constitutions. 110 Exhibit EE – Notice of Violation dated March 2025; Ex. DD – Summons dated April 3, 2025. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 21 of 26 It should also be noted that the City has not articulated a consistent noise standard for the Car Wash. In early May 2025, the Community Development Director told Autowash that there was no single objective noise standard that could be provided in advance of a sound study because the Car Wash was subject to the SUP and the City viewed the applicable SUP criteria as “inherently subjective” and contextual.111 However, at the same time, a municipal noise case under Section 16-103 proceeded against Autowash on identified decibel limits of 65 decibels for daytime (7 a.m. to 10 p.m.) noise and 60 decibels for nighttime (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) noise.112 Then, throughout the consultation with City staff about the initial sound study in July of 2025, the City identified the applicable noise targets for the Car Wash as those found in Table A of Code Section 16-103.c, which were incorporated into Wave’s multiple sound studies without objection or comment from the City.113 On November 21, 2025, the City represented to the neighbors that the applicable noise standards under Table A in Section 16-103.c of the Code were “65 dB from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 60 dB from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. For a residential receptor, the limits are 55 dB and 50 dB, respectively.”114 The latest pivot to applying the noise limits from the state statute was as recent as March 24, 2026, as documented in an email from City staff to the City’s sound consultant in which City staff acknowledged that the City’s Code “doesn’t fully identify the dBs from one type of property to another” and directed EDI to “replace (or supplement)…with the state’s noise requirements since our city attorney says we would defer to the state’s noise regulations.”115 As directed by City staff, the applicable noise limits in EDI’s initial draft sound study were drawn from the state noise statute, C.R.S. § 25-12-103, rather than the City standards Autowash had been using with City staff.116 After Autowash raised concerns that the applicable noise limits being applied had materially changed from the standard applied by the City during the prior ten months of working with the City, the City confirmed that it had similar concerns.117 Unbeknownst to Autowash, on March 31, 2026 City staff revised EDI’s initial draft sound study to remove application of the noise limits in Table A under Section 16- 103.c of the Code and left a comment directing EDI to remove these references and analysis because they could be “legally debated” and directed EDI to use the noise limits under the state statute.118 The City has provided no rationale or justification for changing its interpretation of the City’s noise ordinance and defaulting to the noise limits in the state statute. Nevertheless, the final EDI sound study finds that the City’s noise ordinance for residential or commercial properties does not include an objective or numerical limit, and therefore the state statute applies.119 111 Ex. EE – May 6, 2025 Email from Lauren Mikulak regarding City Noise Standards. 112 Ex. CC. 113 See Ex. S and Ex. I. 114 Ex. MM – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and residents dated September 25, 2025 – December 8, 2025 at pg. 5. 115 Ex. II - Email chain between Jana Easley and Stuart McGregor regarding Wheat Ridge – Carwash Noise Readings at pg. 2. 116 See Ex. T. 117 See Ex. U at 1. 118 Ex. KK – City of Wheat Ridge Car Wash Noise Impact Report 24-Mar-26 (City Redlines) at pg. 3. 119 See Ex. BB. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 22 of 26 If the City is going to apply the state statute, then it must apply the state statute in the manner that it is written. The noise limits in the state statute are measured at 25 feet from the property line of the property generating the noise.120 City staff acknowledged this requirement in their comments on EDI’s draft sound study, and that comment was never addressed.121 EDI’s measurements on the Car Wash property line are therefore misguided and misleading under the state statute. The state statute is written so the limits apply based on the zoning of the property generating the noise and not based on the zoning of the receiving property. EDI is using the state’ noise limits but measuring sound at designated locations and applying a commercial or residential limit based on the zoning of the measurement location. This is a flagrant misapplication of the noise limits in the state statute. Further, the state statute allows for a ten- decibel exceedance of the established limits for a period not to exceed fifteen minutes in any one-hour period between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.122 On average, a car wash takes approximately eight minutes and from EDI’s study to the extent that there are any exceedances of any limit they only occur during the “initial spray” cycle of the wash (e.g., initial vehicle entry into wash bay with pre-wash under carriage and vehicle spray during which the wash-bay doors on the south side of the carwash are open so that the car can drive into the bay and the north wash-bay doors are closed). This cycle of the wash lasts approximately fifteen seconds. At most, only ten cars per hour can pass through one bay. To the extent there is an exceedance of a noise limit, it is for a brief moment and within the allowable ten-decibel exceedance under the state statute.123 The City’s inability to identify and consistently apply a single noise standard underscores why this matter should not proceed as an SUP revocation case. Fundamental fairness and due process require notice of the standard being applied and a consistent application of that standard. If the City believes Autowash violated Section 16-103 of the Code or state statute, the proper forum is in municipal or state court, with the protections of the trial process, not a revocation hearing based on shifting and unsettled noise standards. C. Even if Section 26-114.F applies, revocation is not warranted on this record. Revocation is not required under the Code. Section 26-114.F provides that, upon good cause being shown, the Council may revoke the permit, require corrective measures, direct the City to undertake corrective measures, and modify permit conditions. The Code therefore allows a range of responses and does not treat revocation as the default remedy. The record does not support revocation. Autowash engaged with the City, made operational changes, retained Wave to perform a sound study with spot measurements taken at locations selected by the City and under the operational conditions directed by the City, 120 C.R.S. § 25-12-103(1). 121 Ex. KK at pg. 10. 122 C.R.S. § 25-12-103(2). 123 See Ex. V at 16 (officer report noting that the peak noise from the initial spray lasted approximately one second). Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 23 of 26 voluntarily shut down for an extended period, installed the sound fence Wave recommended with the City’s approval,124 hired Wave to retest the Car Wash with the sound fence installed and shared that report with the City, reopened with the City’s approval applying voluntary operating limitations,125 and then cooperated with the City’s independent sound study. The City’s Second Notice of SUP Noncompliance acknowledges those mitigation efforts and the ongoing technical process. None of this could be done immediately. Autowash’s sound study, mitigation design, sound fence installation, follow-up testing, and reopening process took time, which is part of the reason why Autowash voluntarily closed the Car Wash for over four months. The City’s decision to retain EDI and obtain its own sound study also took time – more than five months passed between the City informing Autowash of its intention to conduct its own study and Autowash’s receipt of the final report. The passage of time, by itself, is thus not evidence of noncompliance. The City continues to use the need to reach a resolution as justification for its hasty actions. Noise is, however, a complex and subjective issue that is affected by many factors and conditions. The City’s rush to reach a final resolution with a simple solution fails to recognize the complexities involved with noise mitigation and has the practical result of foreclosing on opportunities that might be gained from a slower data-driven approach. The least restrictive remedy, if any remedy, is the appropriate one on this record given Autowash’s cooperation and efforts to mitigate noise impacts. By April 22, 2025, before the bulk of the later mitigation efforts were installed or implemented, the Police Department reported that the property was within the allowed decibel limits for daytime and nighttime operations. Wave’s November 2025 follow-up reported background-corrected levels of 53 dBA at the south property line and 47 to 53 dBA at neighborhood locations with two dryers and three vacuums operating, 56 dBA at the south property line and 48 to 56 dBA in the neighborhood with three dryers and three vacuums operating, and 62 dBA at the south property line and 52 to 60 dBA in the neighborhood even with all four dryers and three vacuums running simultaneously. The City’s consultant, EDI, later concluded that the sound fence installed did in fact reduce noise by five to eight decibels and measured noise that was at or below the City’s daytime noise limits for commercial properties. The EDI study, however, only took comparative measurements on each side of the sound fence at spot measurement locations D1 and D2 and then “extrapolated” the sound on the commercial veterinary clinic side of the fence at locations A and G using the lowest end of the 5 to 8 decibel range that it reported between spot measurement locations D1 and D2.126 Property-rights and due-process concerns point the same way. Colorado law and the Code recognize that land-use rights may vest after issuance of a building permit and good faith reliance on that permit, and due process protects those vested or otherwise protected interests 124 Ex. FF – Sept. 30, 2025 Letter from City Approving Installation of Sound Fence. 125 Ex. GG – Nov. 7, 2025 Email from Jana Easley Approving Reopening the Car Wash After Installation of Sound Wall. 126 Ex. BB. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 24 of 26 when they are subject to quasi-judicial governmental action.127 Here, the City approved the use for the Car Wash, issued the building permit, allowed the Car Wash to be built, and issued the certificate of occupancy. Because § 26-114.F authorizes corrective measures and modification of conditions in addition to revocation, and because due process requires fundamental fairness when a quasi-judicial decision threatens a significant property interest, any further action should be limited to the least severe measure the Code permits that addresses the specific concern supported by the record. D. Revocation or adoption of new conditions that prevent continued operation would take vested rights and require just compensation. Wheat Ridge’s Code recognizes that vested rights arise after permit issuance and reliance. Code Section 26-121 states that no vested right is created merely by approval of a site plan, plat, or development plan. But it then provides that “a vested property right shall be created if, after a building, grading or fill permit has been lawfully issued, the successful applicant, owner or permit holder . . . has taken lawful, reasonable and substantial steps, and has incurred lawful, reasonable and substantial expenses, in justifiable reliance upon the approval or permit.” The same section states that its purpose is to adopt the common law of estoppel in pais as the law of vested property rights within the City. This standard is met here. The City approved the SUP, site plan, and related applications after contemporaneous review records found the proposed use and Site Plan satisfied the applicable review standards and left no remaining comments or concerns.128 The City then issued Building Permit No. 202400776 for a new commercial building containing four automatic wash bays, an equipment room, and an employee restroom.129 Construction was completed, and the City issued a certificate of occupancy stating that the building and use complied with the City’s building, zoning, and related land use laws, with “Limitations/Stipulations: None.”130 If the City now revokes the SUP or imposes new conditions that cannot realistically be met while continuing the approved use for the Car Wash, the City will have done more than exceeding its jurisdiction to enforce an existing special use permit. It will have taken or damaged vested property rights that arose after permit issuance, construction, and occupancy. Article II, section 15 of the Colorado Constitution prohibits private property from being “taken or damaged” for public or private use without just compensation. If the Council is inclined to revoke the SUP or impose new conditions that effectively prevent continued operation of that approved use, Autowash will seek all available relief, including just compensation. As of the date of filing this response, Autowash has invested more than $5,500,000 in developing and improving the Car Wash in good faith reliance on City approvals. 127 See Code, Chapter 26, Article I, Section 26-121; see also, Cherry Hills Resort Dev. Co. v. City of Cherry Hills Vill., 757 P.2d 622, 625-26 (Colo. 1988). 128 See Ex. PP and Ex. RR. 129 Ex. N. 130 Ex. O. Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 25 of 26 E. The City’s treatment of comparable noise complaints raises unequal treatment concerns. The City’s treatment of Autowash appears materially different from its treatment of other uses that generated noise complaints in Wheat Ridge. Public reporting concerning Silver Bullet Shooting Range, located at 5901 W. 38th Avenue, approximately one-half mile from the Car Wash, states that the range had noise complaints from surrounding neighbors and that the City worked with the business toward mitigation rather than revocation. According to that report, a City employee helped Silver Bullet pursue funding through the Urban Renewal Authority, and the project received $33,000 for soundproofing and other noise-mitigation improvements. That reported approach stands in sharp contrast to the City’s approach here. In this matter, the City moved from police/code-enforcement review to a Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance, demanded extensive corrective actions at Autowash’s sole cost, required a sound study, accepted a voluntary closure and mitigation process, then proceeded to a second notice and revocation hearing before the issues identified in the City’s own draft consultant report were resolved. According to the latest acoustical report in the City’s possession, which is dated May 1, 2024, and was prepared for the Silver Bullet Shooting Range by Wave,131 the average gunshot sound level measured in the two residential properties to the north of the shooting range was above 55 dBA, which is the daytime residential limit that is being applied to Autowash. For gunshots from a .308 firearm, the average gunshot sound level measured in the residential properties was approximately 58 dBA at one location and 68 dBA at another. The City has offered no explanation for the different enforcement approaches being taken when the Silver Bullet Shooting Range is creating similar or greater noise impacts on residential receiving properties. Colorado law recognizes that discriminatory or arbitrary enforcement of zoning regulations can implicate equal-protection concerns.132 Autowash therefore preserves and asserts its position that the City’s handling of this matter constitutes unequal treatment and selective enforcement. Autowash further reserves the right to supplement this section after review of additional records concerning comparable situations, including the Silver Bullet Shooting Range matter, and after production of materials showing how the City responded to other noise complaints. On the present record, those concerns weigh further against revocation or the imposition of new conditions. V. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 131 Ex. HH – May 1, 2024, Silver Bullet Shooting Range – Noise Study Report prepared by Wave Engineering. 132 Earl & Sons Tire Ctr., Inc. v. City of Boulder, Bd. of Appeals, 559 P.2d 236, 238 (Colo. 1977) Autowash Lakeside SUP Revocation Hearing May 8, 2026 Page 26 of 26 Autowash expressly reserves all rights, claims, defenses, objections, and remedies, whether legal or equitable. Nothing in this response should be construed as a waiver of any argument concerning the City’s authority, the sufficiency of the notices, the adequacy of the process provided, the propriety of any ex parte or off-record communications, vested rights, due process, equal protection, selective enforcement, takings, estoppel, or any other claim or defense. Autowash also expressly reserves the right to supplement this response. This response is being submitted without the benefit of the City’s staff report, staff recommendation, presentation materials, and the full set of records requested from the City. Autowash therefore reserves the right to submit additional written materials and to supplement or revise the arguments set forth above after those materials are produced and reviewed. VI. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the City has not identified a violation of a condition or stipulation of SUP-23-01. There is no competent evidence in the record to support revocation or amendment of the SUP. Therefore, the City is exceeding its jurisdiction and enforcement authority under the Code by bringing this enforcement action. Additionally, the City’s concerns with adverse impacts to the surrounding area related to noise must be addressed through enforcement of the City’s noise ordinance and not by City Council review of the SUP. Autowash respectfully requests that the City Council decline to revoke the SUP and decline to impose new conditions. If the City Council nevertheless determines that some action is warranted, Autowash requests that any such action be limited to specific corrective measures supported by the record and consistent with the City’s legal obligations. Finally, Autowash welcomes further data-driven discussions with the City and other stakeholders regarding strategies and opportunities for improving Car Wash operations and mitigating potential impacts for the benefit of the entire City of Wheat Ridge. Very truly yours, SPENCER FANE LLP John Peckler Enclosures Cc: Lauren Mikulak Gerald Dahl Thad Renaud Dennis Dreeszen Erin Dreeszen AUTOWASH LAKESIDE RESPONSE EXHIBIT LIST Ex. A – Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance dated June 24, 2025 Ex. B – Second Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance and Revocation Hearing dated Apr. 16, 2026 Ex. C - Letter from James T. Kirschman, Hover Architecture, dated May 4, 2026 Ex. D - Letter from Aaron Voorhees, ASLAN Design Management Inc., dated April 30, 2026. Ex. E – Email from Jana Easley, Planning Manager, to Jeff Kwolkoski, Erin Dreeszen, and Dennis Dreeszen, dated June 9, 2025, re: proposed sound-reading locations for the Lakeside Autowash sound study Ex. F – Letter from John Peckler to Lauren Mikulak and Gerald Dahl, dated Sept. 26, 2025, re: Response to Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash – SUP-23-01 – 5900 W. 44th Avenue. Ex. G – Letter from Lauren Mikulak to John Peckler and Autowash Team, dated Sept. 30, 2025, re: Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash Ex. H – Email chain dated Sept. 25–30, 2025, re: Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study Ex. I – Updated Test Results (Autowash) Wave #3441A, dated Nov. 6, 2025 Ex. J – Pre-Application Meeting Summary dated July 14, 2022 Ex. K – Neighborhood Meeting Notice Ex. L – City of Wheat Ridge Approval Letter dated June 27, 2024 Ex. M – Special Use Permit Approval dated January 16, 2024 Ex. N – Building Permit No. 202400776 Ex. O – Certificate of Occupancy Ex. P – Land Use Case Processing Application dated February 9, 2023 Ex. Q – Project Narrative dated February 10, 2023 Ex. R – Site Plan and Construction Documents for Autowash Lakeside Ex. S – Wave Engineering Acoustical Report dated September 19, 2025 Ex. T – Engineering Dynamics Sound Level Measurement Results dated March 24, 2026 Ex. U – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak, John Peckler, and others, dated Mar. 24–Apr. 9, 2026, re: City’s Sound Study Ex. V – Wheat Ridge Police Department Incident Officer Reports/General Reports Ex. W – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and John Peckler, dated June 17–20, 2025, re: Lakeside Autowash Operating Conditions and Noise Mitigation Measures Ex. X – Officer DeNoto BWC Footage dated April 16, 2025 Ex. Y - Autowash Response to First Notice of Noncompliance, June 25, 2025 Ex. Z – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and John Peckler dated December 8–10, 2025, re: Current Carwash Operations. Ex. AA –April 29, 2026 Email from Lauren Mikulak transmitting Revised EDI Sound Study Ex. BB – Revised EDI Sound Study dated April 5, 2026. Ex. CC –Notice of Violation dated March 2025 Ex. DD – Summons dated April 3, 2025 Ex. EE – May 6, 2025 Email from Lauren Mikulak regarding City Noise Standards. Ex. FF – Sept. 30, 2025 Letter from City Approving Installation of Sound Fence. Ex. GG– Nov. 7, 2025 Email from Jana Easley Approving Reopening the Car Wash After Installation of Sound Wall Ex. HH - Silver Bullet Noise Study Report by Wave dated May 1, 2024 Ex. II – Email chain between Jana Easley and Stuart McGregor regarding Wheat Ridge – Carwash Noise Readings Ex. JJ – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and Marie Trujillo dated November 11, 2025 – December 10,2025 Ex. KK – City of Wheat Ridge Car Wash Noise Impact Report 24-Mar-26 (City Redlines) Ex. LL – Email chain between Alayna Olivas-Loera and Jana Easley dated March 7-10, 2025 Ex. MM – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and residents dated September 25, 2025 – December 8, 2025 at pg. 5 NOTE: Ex. X not included in packet because of video format Ex. NN – Email chain between Lauren Mikulak and Stuart McGregor dated December 4, 2025 – February 4, 2026. Ex. OO – Email chain between City staff dated March 7, 2025 – March 11, 2025. Ex. PP – May 6, 2024 Letter from Alayna Olivas-Loera to Christian Tidwell, re: Autowash Site Plan and CDs Approval Ex. QQ – Approval of Site Plan dated July 5, 2024 Ex. RR – January 16, 2024 Memorandum from Alayna Olivas-Loera to Lauren Mikulak, re: SUP-23-01/Autowash Lakeside City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us June 24, 2025 Muth Properties LLC 26201 W 108th St Olathe, KS 66061 Subject: Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, Following recent discussions with the City Manager and City Attorney’s Office, and in response to continued concerns from Wheat Ridge City Councilmembers and neighboring residents, I am writing to provide formal notice of noncompliance with the conditions and representations of the Special Use Permit (SUP-23-01) issued on January 16, 2024 for the Lakeside Autowash facility at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, pursuant to Section 26-114.F.2 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code. As you are aware, complaints from neighboring residents persist. While we appreciate your responsiveness to date, the operation and maintenance of the carwash is creating an impact on the neighborhood. Complaints began in March 2025, the need for a sound study was first raised on May 1, and your June 20 update estimates a final report in mid-August with no timeline for mitigation. That timeline is simply too long given the continued and significant impact on nearby homes—particularly from the air dryers, which remain a source of acute concern. Finding of Noncompliance The following issues constitute noncompliance with the approved SUP:  Door Operations: The SUP application materials depicted bay doors as closed. In practice, the south-facing door have not been consistently closed since opening, and the north door remains open during the wash and dry cycle.  Operational Noise Impacts on the Neighborhood: The SUP narrative submitted with the application states: “The proposed new car wash replaces an existing car wash. It will not have a detrimental effect on the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood.” Based on ongoing complaints and field observations, staff finds that the carwash as proposed in the SUP application has been significantly altered, specifically dryer operations are taking place with doors open during operations. The operation and maintenance of the carwash and the associated noise levels is having a detrimental effect and is degrading the welfare and quality of life of persons residing and working in the area. Exhibit A - Page 1 of 3 2 Per Section 26-114.F.2, this letter serves as formal notice that corrective measures must be taken by each of the deadlines listed below. Failure to address any of these issues by the associated prescribed deadlines will result in the scheduling of a revocation hearing before City Council. Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines 1. Modified Operational Hours Effective immediately, the carwash may not be operational between the hours of 9:55pm and 7am. It is unclear if these hours are being implemented consistently. 2. Evidence of Signed Sound Study Contract By Friday, June 27, 2025, provide via email evidence of a signed contract with the sound consultant. 3. Removal of 24-Hour Signage By Monday, June 30, 2025, remove, cover, or revise on-site signage that advertises 24/7 operation to comply with Corrective Action #1 and to align with your June 20 assurance regarding hours. Of note, the south side doors continue to advertise 24- hour operations. Send confirmation of completeness via email by such date. 4. Immediate Noise Mitigation By Thursday, July 3, 2025, the following operational changes shall be implemented:  All wash bays shall have both entry and exit doors fully closed during operation.  Dryers shall be disabled until such time as the sound study is complete and mitigation measures are in place such as to effectively address the noise impact on the neighborhood. 5. Progress Report By Monday, July 14, 2025, the following documentation shall be submitted:  Sound Monitoring Data: Provide all available data collected to date, including measurements under various operating scenarios (e.g., one bay vs. multiple bays, start of wash vs. middle of wash vs. dryer) and at different locations. If dryers have been turned off pursuant to corrective action #4 above, they may be temporarily reactivated for testing purposes with advance notice to the city of at least two business days.  Point-of-Sale (POS) Data: Submit transaction-level data, with time stamps by bay, for usage from April 1 through July 1.  Updated Operational Summary: Provide the city with the following: o Modifications made since June 20, 2025. o Current standard operating procedures for doors and dryers. o Any additional temporary or permanent noise mitigation measures now in place. 6. Draft Report By Friday, August 15, 2025, submit draft sound study report with recommendations. Exhibit A - Page 2 of 3 3 7. Mitigation Measures Upon review of the draft report, additional deadlines will be established. I urge you to treat these as firm deadlines and to respond fully. If the corrective actions identified in this letter are not resolved by each of the specified dates, the city will initiate the scheduling of a revocation hearing before City Council in accordance with code Section 26-114.F.2. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak, AICP Community Development Director cc: Evan Singleton Dennis Dreeszen Erin Dreeszen Jeff Kwolkosi City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file Exhibit A - Page 3 of 3 City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us April 16, 2026 John Peckler Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 Denver, CO 80203-4554 Subject: Second Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance and Revocation Hearing – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, The purpose of this letter is to provide a second notice of noncompliance related to the approved Special Use Permit (“SUP”) for Lakeside Autowash, located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, and to provide notice of a public revocation hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council who will hear evidence concerning the nature and extent of the alleged noncompliance with the conditions of the SUP. The first Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance was issued on June 24, 2025. This second notice is given in compliance with Section 26-114.F of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (“Code”). A public hearing has been set for Monday, May 11, 2026 at 6:30pm before the Wheat Ridge City Council for the purpose of reviewing the Special Use Permit and associated conditions related to the Lakeside Autowash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, and if necessary, taking action with respect to that SUP. Background The subject property, located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, is zoned Commercial-One (C-1) and has operated as a carwash since 1997. The prior use consisted of an automatic bay and four open self-service bays. The surrounding area includes a mix of commercial uses, with a residential neighborhood located to the south. From July 2022 to June 2024, Autowash pursued redevelopment of the site, including demolition of the existing structure and construction of a new automatic carwash. Because carwashes are permitted only through a Special Use Permit (SUP) in the C-1 zone district, an SUP application (Case No. SUP-23-01) was submitted and required discretionary review. The SUP application materials, including architectural elevations, depicted a facility with doors on both sides of each bay, consistently shown in the closed position. The proposal was reviewed through multiple rounds of staff review and public notice. A neighborhood meeting was held prior to the application submittal in August 2022, and a formal notice period occurred prior to Exhibit B - Page 1 of 4 2 conclusion of the application review in December 2023. No public comments were received during the formal notice period. On January 16, 2024, I approved the SUP administratively following all required public notice and based on findings that the proposed use would not have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area and would not create impacts greater than those allowed under existing zoning. These findings were informed in part by the expectation that the new facility would improve upon the prior condition, including through enclosed bays. Construction was completed in early 2025, and a Certificate of Occupancy was issued on February 2, 2025. The carwash began operations shortly thereafter. Within weeks of opening, the City began receiving complaints regarding noise, hours of operation, and the opening of bay doors during operation. Complaints were submitted through multiple channels, including via emails, phone calls, testimony at City Council meetings, service requests, and directly to the Police Department. Commencing in April 2025, City staff-initiated outreach to Autowash with a focus on achieving voluntary compliance with the SUP and addressing operational impacts. This included: • Multiple meetings with Autowash, its legal counsel, and technical consultants; • Requests for sound studies and operational adjustments; • Documentation of concerns related to open bay doors and neighborhood impacts; and ultimately • Issuance of a Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance on June 24, 2025. Following issuance of the June 24, 2025 Notice of Noncompliance, Autowash proposed and implemented a voluntary 90-day closure to allow for further analysis and mitigation. During and after this period: • A sound study was commissioned by Autowash and mitigation measures were explored, including a proposed sound wall; • The City and Autowash coordinated on potential design solutions and operational changes; • Autowash installed a six-foot tall fence on the southern property line; and • The facility reopened under modified conditions, including limited hours (7:00am to 10:00pm) and limited operations (only three of the four bays). Despite these efforts, the City continued to receive complaints and observed that operational conditions—including inconsistent use of bay doors and ongoing noise impacts—remained unresolved. The City undertook independent third-party sound analysis in March 2026 to better understand existing conditions. While technical data has informed discussions, the core issue remains whether the use, as operated, satisfies the discretionary criteria of the SUP. Over the course of more than one year, the City has pursued voluntary compliance, operational adjustments, technical study, and facilitated dialogue including the offer of professional Exhibit B - Page 2 of 4 3 mediation. These efforts have not resulted in sustained resolution of the identified impacts on the surrounding area. Accordingly and consistent with Code Section 26-114.F, I have determined that formal review by City Council is necessary to evaluate the status of the Special Use Permit and to determine whether modification, additional conditions, or revocation is warranted to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding area. Special Use Permit Authority and Findings Pursuant to Section 26-114.A of the Code, special uses are discretionary and may be approved only where they are properly designed, developed, operated, and maintained such that potential adverse impacts are mitigated. Applicable criteria for review include the following: • The special use will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood; and • The special use will not create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing zoning for the property. Based on the City’s review of operations since the facility opened in February 2025, including documented complaints, staff observations, and ongoing compliance efforts, the City has determined that: • The operation of the carwash has resulted in ongoing adverse impacts to the surrounding area, particularly related to noise and operational characteristics; and • The facility is not operating in a manner consistent with the representations and assumptions underlying the SUP approval, including the depiction and expected use of enclosed bays. These findings are not based on a single incident, but rather on a pattern of operational impacts and unsuccessful attempts to achieve sustained compliance through voluntary measures. These findings form the basis of my request for a hearing and Council action. Public Hearing A public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council has been scheduled as follows: • Date: Monday, May 11, 2026 • Time: 6:30 PM • Location: Wheat Ridge City Council Chambers (7500 W. 29th Avenue) At this hearing, City Council will consider the status of the Special Use Permit pursuant to Code Section 26-114.F, including the authority: • To cancel or revoke the Special Use Permit; • To require certain corrective measures to be taken; and/or • To modify the conditions which apply to the SUP. The order of proceedings at the hearing will be: • Staff presentation Exhibit B - Page 3 of 4 4 • Autowash (SUP holder) presentation • Public comment • Autowash response to public comment • Questions from Council to staff and Autowash • Close the public hearing • Council discussion and action You may submit materials for City Council’s review in advance of the meeting. Materials must be received by Friday, May 1 at 11:00am for inclusion in the meeting packet, and should be emailed directly to me at lmikulak@wheatridge.gov. You may also present testimony and evidence at the hearing. Public Notice In accordance with Section 26-109 of the Code: • The City will publish notice of the hearing in the official newspaper; • The City will mail letter notice of the hearing to property owners and occupants within 1,000 feet; and • Posted notice of the hearing is also required on the property. To accomplish this, the City will prepare the required posting signs. The signs are ready for pickup at Wheat Ridge City Hall in the Community Development Department (7500 W. 29th Avenue, Second Floor). Please arrange to retrieve and post these signs on the property by end of day on Friday, April 24. Closing The City has made extensive efforts to work collaboratively toward a resolution. While your efforts over the last year are acknowledged, the impacts have persisted, and formal review by City Council is now necessary. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this process. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak, AICP Community Development Director cc: Evan Singleton, Spencer Fane Dennis Dreeszen, Autowash Erin Dreeszen, Autowash Muth Properties LLC, Property Owner Derek Dummermuth, Property Owner Registered Agent City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file Exhibit B - Page 4 of 4 Z:\Hover Projects\2022\2202.58 Autowash Lakeside\Legal\Autowash Lakeside Letter-050426.docx 383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 175 • Englewood, CO 80112 Page 1 of 2 Voice: 720.773.2800 383 INVERNESS PARKWAY, SUITE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 May 4, 2026 Dennis Dreeszen Autowash Companies 7005 East 46th Avenue Drive, Unit B Denver, CO 80216 United States of America (303) 514-0905 MEMORANDUM RE: Autowash - Lakeside 5900 W 44th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80212 SUP-23-01 Hover Architecture prepared and submitted the Site Plan and Special Use Permit applications for the above referenced project. Both applications included drawings and exhibits set forth in the Site Plan Submittal Checklist, revised 10/22 and the Special Use Permit Checklist, revised 6/20. The applications were initially submitted to the City on or about February 10th, 2023, and approved on June 27th, 2024. Per Section 26-224 of the Zoning and Development Code, the proposed structures were designed to comply with the City of Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual. The exterior elevations submitted to the city for review illustrated compliance with that design manual and specifically the Façade Design, Materials, Transparency and Screening included in Chapter 4 – Building Design. In order to show compliance, it was necessary for the design team to show all of the elements of the proposed structure including any fenestration. This can only be accomplished with these elements in their closed positions. I understand the City is concerned with the overhead doors at the wash bays being open during the operation of the wash and that the design team misrepresented this throughout the approval process. Firstly, the purpose of developing exterior architectural elevations for jurisdictional approval is to illustrate the proposed design, materials, colors and finishes of each element. For doors, overhead or otherwise, it is necessary to show them in their closed position. Showing an overhead door in its open position would suggest that a door isn’t proposed and thereby not approved. Hover has never depicted overhead doors in their open position when seeking approval. Secondly, in reviewing the Zoning and Development Code, I found no reference prohibiting overhead doors remaining open during the operation of car washing equipment. Thirdly, in reviewing the submittals, city review comments and emails between the City, Client and design team, I found no discussion of the position of the overhead doors while a car was in the bay and the equipment operating. If this was a concern of the City, I found no evidence to suggest it. Exhibit C - Page 1 of 2 Z:\Hover Projects\2022\2202.58 Autowash Lakeside\Legal\Autowash Lakeside Letter-050426.docx 383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 175 • Englewood, CO 80112 Page 2 of 2 Voice: 720.773.2800 Lastly, in my experience, when a governing jurisdiction is required to impose operational restrictions on building owners and developers, those restrictions are committed to writing and included in the Project Narrative, on the drawing set or by separate letter. The design team was never advised of any such restriction. Hover has successfully prepared hundreds of similar applications for car wash owners, operators and developers across the country. Our team is well-versed in the design and operation of car washes. We have the experience and skillset necessary to obtain development approval without resorting to misrepresentation. Sincerely, James T Kirschman Owner/Architect Exhibit C - Page 2 of 2 Date: April 30,2026 To: Planner, City of Wheat Ridge Re: Industry Standard Operation of Vehicle Wash Facilities – Use of Doors City of Wheatridge, I am writing in my capacity as an industry expert in car wash development, design, construction, and operations in response to concerns raised regarding the operation of the recently constructed AutoWash facility within the City of Wheat Ridge, specifically relating to the use of exit doors during warmer months. I have been continuously involved in the car wash industry since 2002, with professional experience that includes: • Ownership and operation of multiple car wash facilities for over two decades • Ownership of a nationally recognized construction company specializing exclusively in car wash facilities • Ownership of a pre-engineered metal building (PEMB) company supplying car wash building systems nationwide • Former ownership of an 11-location express car wash chain in Colorado, which I sold in 2021 This background provides both local and national perspective on accepted car wash design and operational standards. Industry Standard Use of Doors at Car Wash Facilities It is important to clarify that doors on car wash buildings are not intended for continuous operation throughout the year, nor is year-round closed-door operation recognized as an industry standard. Across the United States—including colder northern climates—car wash doors are used solely as seasonal freeze-protection measures, not as operational noise, vapor, or visual containment systems. Industry practice is as follows: • In cold winter months, doors are closed to: o Prevent freezing of equipment and plumbing o Maintain minimum indoor temperatures necessary for mechanical systems • In warm months, doors are intentionally left open at all times to: Exhibit D - Page 1 of 3 o Provide ventilation and humidity relief o Prevent heat buildup from motors, blowers, and water systems o Maintain safe working conditions for equipment o Optimize vehicle throughput and customer safety This seasonal operational approach is consistent across Colorado, the Midwest, the Northeast, and the Pacific Northwest. National Perspective From a national standpoint: • Southern states frequently operate car washes with no doors at all, and in many cases no roofs either. • Open-air tunnels are common in Texas, Arizona, Florida, California, and the Southeast • These facilities function safely, efficiently, and in compliance with local regulations The presence of doors in northern states should therefore be understood as a cold-weather adaptation, not a requirement for daily operation. Colorado-Specific Conditions In Colorado specifically: • Doors are typically closed only during freezing or sub-freezing conditions • During spring, summer, and early fall, doors remain open as a matter of standard, accepted practice • Continuous door closure during warm months is not typical, not necessary, and not operationally advisable Operating a car wash with doors closed during warm weather can create excessive heat, moisture accumulation, corrosion risk, and premature equipment failure—conditions that industry best practices actively seek to avoid. Conclusion Based on more than two decades of direct experience, it is my professional opinion that: • Keeping car wash doors open during warm months is normal, reasonable, and standard • across the industry • Closed-door operation year-round is not an industry standard, even in colder climates Exhibit D - Page 2 of 3 • The AutoWash facility, by operating with doors open during warm weather, is behaving consistent with established industry norms I respectfully encourage the City to consider these long-standing operational practices when evaluating the facility’s compliance and intended design function. Please feel free to contact me should additional clarification or technical discussion be helpful. Sincerely, Aaron Voorhees Industry Expert – Car Wash Development & Operations ASLAN Design Management Inc. Aaron@ASLANCorporation.com 303-995-0800 Exhibit D - Page 3 of 3 1 From:Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 2:00 PM To:dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; JeffK@waveengineering.us Cc:Lauren Mikulak; Peckler, John; Singleton, Evan; Gerald Dahl Subject:[EXTERNAL] Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. Hello Jeff, Erin and Dennis, After doing some research on who spoke during the hearings and/or to city staff, we’ve applied those to the below map (orange stars). Based on these, we propose three additional locations where sound readings should be taken (yellow X’s). We will leave it to Jeff as the expert to determine if these are the best locations, but they seem right based on complaints and/or proximity to the carwash. Jeff, once you have a timeline of the work, please let us know. Thanks, Jana Exhibit E - Page 1 of 3 2 Jana Easley, AICP Planning Manager 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Ofﬁce Phone: 303-235-2844 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us NEW PERMIT PORTAL!The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. Exhibit E - Page 2 of 3 3 Don't forget to follow our Social Media Accounts! Facebook - bit.ly/FBWRPD - bit.ly/FBCityWR Twitter - twitter.com/WheatRidgePD - twitter.com/CityWheatRidge Instagram - bit.ly/InstaWRPD CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-conﬁdential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notiﬁed that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Exhibit E - Page 3 of 3 John Peckler Direct Dial: 303-839-3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com SPENCER FANE LLP | 1700 LINCOLN STREET, SUITE 2000, DENVER, CO 80203-4554 | 303.839.3800 | FAX | spencerfane.com September 26, 2025 VIA E-MAIL Lauren Mikulak, AICP City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Director 7500 W. 29th Avenue, 2nd Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us Gerald Dahl, Esq. City Attorney City of Wheat Ridge 710 Kipling Street, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80215 gdahl@mdbrlaw.com Re: Response to Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash - SUP- 23-01 – 5900 W. 44th Avenue Dear Ms. Mikulak: Spencer Fane LLP represents the operators (“Autowash”) of the Autowash Lakeside carwash (“Carwash”), located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80212. On June 24, 2025, the City of Wheat Ridge (“City”) issued Autowash a Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance (“Notice of Noncompliance”) for the Carwash. Autowash responded to the Notice of Noncompliance on June 25th in a letter (“90-Day Stay Letter”) offering in lieu of the Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines in the Notice of Noncompliance an agreement between the parties for a 90- day stay on enforcement of the various compliance deadlines during which period Autowash would voluntarily suspend operation of the Carwash, obtain and sound study, and coordinate with the City on potential additional mitigation measures or operational changes. On June 26th, the City accepted Autowash’s offer to stay enforcement of the Notice of Noncompliance on the terms proposed by Autowash in the 90-Day Stay Letter. In accordance with the 90-Day Stay Letter, on July 8th Autowash provided the City with notice that it would be operating the Carwash to complete the sound testing on July 11th. In that communication, Autowash also clarified that during the voluntary suspension of commercial operations Autowash would continue to perform routine maintenance and testing of the Carwash equipment between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:00 pm by running each bay of the Carwash with the bay doors open once per day to observe the equipment and identify any potential issues. Autowash agreed to disable the dryers during the routine maintenance. On July 8th, the City confirmed that the proposed date for the sound Exhibit F - Page 1 of 3 Lauren Mikulak Gerald Dahl September 26, 2025 Page 2 DE 10406846.1 testing and the routine maintenance activities were both acceptable. On July 9th, Autowash followed up with the City to give notice that due to weather conditions, the sound testing would be postponed until July 14th. Wave Engineering (“Sound Engineer”) completed the sound testing at and around the Carwash on July 14th including by taking sound measurements at the specific locations near the Carwash that were requested by the City. On September 19, 2025, Autowash provided the City with a copy of the sound study (“Sound Study”) evaluating the Carwash that was prepared by the Sound Engineer. On September 25th, Autowash and the City met to discuss the findings of the Sound Study and the recommended mitigation measures for the Carwash. During that meeting, Autowash committed to installing a 6’ sound fence (“Sound Fence”) meeting the design and material requirements described in the Sound Study. After the meeting, Autowash provided the City with preliminary drawings showing the general design and materials that would be used for the Sound Fence, and the City’s Building Division confirmed that the Sound Fence falls under the City’s building permit exemption for 6’ fences. Based on all of the above activities, Autowash and the City have satisfied the requirements of the 90-Day Stay Letter. Subject to Autowash’s voluntary compliance with the following requirements, Autowash respectfully requests that the City withdraw the Notice of Noncompliance and allow the Carwash to reopen. 1. The temporary suspension of all commercial Carwash operations will remain until Autowash has caused the installation of the Sound Fence. During the continued temporary suspension of commercial Carwash operations, Autowash can continue to perform routine maintenance and testing of the Carwash equipment between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:00 pm with the dryers disconnected. 2. Once the Sound Fence is installed, the Carwash can operate between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 3. Once the Sound Fence is installed, Autowash will have the Sound Engineer test the sound levels of the Carwash using the same equipment and measurement locations that were used in the Sound Study and share those results with the City. 4. Autowash reserves the right to modify any of the voluntary operational requirements proposed in this letter after coordination with the City on such modifications. Autowash understands and recognizes the nature of the City’s concerns and is committed to continuing to cooperate with the City to find workable solutions. Moreover, Autowash will continue to evaluate measures for reducing the sound from the Carwash as part of being a responsible business and good neighbor. As evidence of such commitment, Autowash is actively developing and evaluating new equipment that could further mitigate sound from the Carwash. Autowash believes that the requirements proposed above will adequately address the City’s concerns as described in the Notice of Noncompliance, and allow Autowash to reopen the Carwash for commercial operations in accordance with the terms of SUP-23-01. If the City is willing to accept Autowash’s proposal as described in this letter, please confirm so in writing before the expiration of the stay in enforcement under the 90-Day Stay Letter. We look forward to your prompt response to this letter and continued cooperation. Exhibit F - Page 2 of 3 Lauren Mikulak Gerald Dahl September 26, 2025 Page 3 DE 10406846.1 Sincerely, Spencer Fane LLP John Peckler JP Exhibit F - Page 3 of 3 City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us September 30, 2025 John Peckler Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 Denver, CO 80203-4554 Muth Properties LLC 26201 W 108th St Olathe, KS 66061 Subject: Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, The City is in receipt of your letter dated September 26, 2025. We appreciate the commitments outlined in your correspondence, including the voluntary continuation of the suspension of operations until installation of the sound fence, as well as the commitment to retest sound levels using the same methodology and to share those results with the City. These steps are important to advancing resolution of the concerns identified in the Notice of Noncompliance. As you move forward, please keep the City informed regarding scheduling and progress on installation of the sound fence and the subsequent retesting. Before recommencing public operations, please contact us so that we can confirm that the required steps have been completed. For clarity, the June 24 Notice of Noncompliance will not be withdrawn at this time. Rather, the City will hold it in abeyance pending completion of the commitments described in your September 26 letter and this correspondence. If this letter raises questions, please reach out. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak, AICP Community Development Director Exhibit G - Page 1 of 2 2 cc: Evan Singleton Dennis Dreeszen Erin Dreeszen Jeff Kwolkosi City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file Exhibit G - Page 2 of 2 1 From:Peckler, John Sent:Friday, November 7, 2025 12:33 PM To:Jana Easley; Lauren Mikulak (lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us) Cc:Singleton, Evan; JeffK@waveengineering.us; dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; Gerald Dahl Subject:FW: Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study Jana, Thank you for the quick response. We appreciate your review and attention to the matter. Autowash will reopen the car wash in accordance with your instructions below. Once everyone is back in town later next week, I may follow up with Jerry to see if he would like to anything more to formalize this understanding. Enjoy your conference and have a nice weekend, John John Peckler Attorney Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 | Denver, CO 80203 O 303.839.3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com | spencerfane.com From: Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2025 12:26 PM To: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com>; Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com>; JeffK@waveengineering.us; dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. Hi John, et al, Lauren and I are both at conferences, and Jerry is out of office. However, I’ve reviewed the updated sound study. It appears that the carwash is generally meeting the dB unless all 4 dryers and all 3 vacuums are being run simultaneously. I agree that would be atypical based on what I’ve seen at another of their locations. I also noted that M4 and M5 were not retested; I assume those would be exactly where the wall was built and that new testing would be on the north side of the new wall. M1, M2 and M3 are on site and also were not tested. Based on the offsite readings you’ve provided, we can clear you to open the west three bays during the restricted hours (7 AM to 10 PM). Exhibit H - Page 1 of 3 2 We’ll continue to monitor. If we continue to receive complaints, it’s helpful that we have this revised sound study. If we determine based on our own dB readings the wash doesn’t seem to be in compliance, we will reach back out. We greatly appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Please stay in touch regarding future sound readings and the fourth bay. Thanks, Jana Jana Easley, AICP Planning Manager Phone: 303-235-2844 jeasley@wheatridge.gov From: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2025 10:36 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com>; JeffK@waveengineering.us; Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov>; dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Subject: RE: Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study Importance: High Lauren, The sound engineer completed the follow up sound measurements at 8:00 pm on November 5th. Attached for your prompt review are the results of those measurements. Autowash respectfully requests that the city approve the operation of the 3 western bays. In this scenario, the measured sound levels at all locations are below or within 1 dba of the allowable decibel levels under the City’s municipal code. The 1 dba exceedance was measured using the “worst case scenario” with all 3 vacuums and all 3 western bay dryers running simultaneously. During real world operations it is unlikely that this scenario would frequently occur. The length of a dryer cycle is approximately 1.83 minutes, and the max number of cars that can pass through the carwash per hour is 6. Therefore, if all 3 bays of the carwash are running at 100% capacity, approximately 1.202 minutes per hour all 3 dryers will be running at the same time. The measured levels also include all 3 vacuums running at the same time, which is even less likely to happen with all three bays running. As a point of reference, the state noise statute recognizes the fluctuations of sound and allows for a 10 dba exceedance of any limit if the exceedance does not last longer than fifteen minutes in any one-hour period. To the extent that it occurs, any exceedance at the car wash would be 1 dba and last for 1.202 minutes per hour. I also want to point out that the ambient sound in this area includes unavoidable noise from traffic, which constantly fluctuates throughout the day and can easily exceed the level of sound being made by the carwash. Caution:This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit H - Page 2 of 3 3 Based on the above, Autowash believes that operating 3 bays will not cause unreasonable levels of noise when taking into account the urban environment including other unavoidable ambient noises and the fact that any potential exceedance of the City’s noise standard in the “worst case scenario” would be 1dba over the limit and last for approximately 1.202 minutes per hour. Autowash would appreciate the city’s response before the 5:00 pm today so that it can open the 3 bays of the carwash for the weekend. I also want to let the city know that Autowash continues to evaluate additional noise mitigation measures with the goal of returning to all 4 bays being open and 24-hour operations. Best regards, John John Peckler Attorney Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 | Denver, CO 80203 O 303.839.3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com | spencerfane.com Exhibit H - Page 3 of 3 November 6, 2025 Erin Dreeszen Founder, Chief of Staff Autowash Companies 9525 E 40thth Ave #110 Denver, CO 8023838 Re:Autowash –Wheat Ridge Acoustical Report Wave #3441A Dear Erin, We measured ambient sound levels at the south property line and at various points in the neighborhood near the Autowash property in Wheat Ridge on November 5, 2025. The purpose of the visit was to measure the Autowash equipment sound level in the neighborhood with the new sound wall in place. Equipment The following test equipment was used. 4380 Harlan St and S Property Line Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0002878, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 023893 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 314955 4345 Gray St and 4325 Gray St Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0001119, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 026106 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 138652 Larson Davis CAL250 acoustic calibrator, S/N 2405 The sound meter calibration was checked before and after the measurements. Exhibit I - Page 1 of 4 Erin Dreeszen November 6, 2025 Page 2 Measurement Procedures Two Wave consultants visited the site on Wednesday, November 5 to measure the noise level of Autowash equipment at the south property line and at three locations in the neighborhood. Ambient measurements were taken for comparison as well. The measurement locations are shown on Figure 1. Figure 1: Measurement locations Measurements were taken with dryers running in the west-most two, west-most three, and all four of the wash bays. The three south-most vacuums were also running during the measurements. The measured levels were a combination of Autowash noise and ambient noise (like traffic).Since traffic noise was loud enough to interfere with carwash measurements, we measured each condition for 4 to 5 minutes to find periods when background noise was at its lowest. We evaluated the data and made an effort to use the data from time periods when noise from passing cars and other background activity was at its lowest. We then used the L9090 levels W 44thth Ave Gr a y S t N H a r l a n S t M6 M7 M8 M9 Key: Spot measurement Sound wall Exhibit I - Page 2 of 4 Erin Dreeszen November 6, 2025 Page 3 from Table 1 to correct the measured carwash noise levels.That is, where the background noise levels were within 10 dBA of the carwash levels, the background noise was subtracted out mathematically. This gives the most accurate indication of the actual noise levels of the carwash. The measured background levels results are shown in Table 1 and the carwash results are shown in Table 2. Table 1: Measured background levels –carwash not running Measurement Location Measured Background Level (dBA) LEQEQ L9090 M6: S Property Line –E corner 5151 4646 M7: 4380 Harlan –street edge 6262 5050 M8: 4345 Gray St –street edge 5050 4545 M9: 4325 Gray St –street edge 4747 4444 The LEQEQ is the Equivalent Sound Level is the average level during the measurement period. The L9090 isis the 90 percentile sound level. It is the sound level that is exceeded 90% of the time and can be thought of as the sound level during lulls in traffic and other background sound “events.” Table 2: Autowash equipment sound levels Event Source Measurement Location Equipment Sound Level –background corrected (dBA) W 2 dryers + S 3 vacuums M6: S Property Line –E corner 5353 M7: 4380 Harlan –street edge 5050 M8: 4345 Gray St –street edge 5353 M9: 4325 Gray St –street edge 4747 W 3 dryers + S 3 vacuums M6: S Property Line –E corner 5656 M7: 4380 Harlan –street edge 5050 M8: 4345 Gray St –street edge 5656 M9: 4325 Gray St –street edge 4848 All 4 dryers + S 3 vacuums M6: S Property Line –E corner 6262 M7: 4380 Harlan –street edge 5353 M8: 4345 Gray St –street edge 6060 M9: 4325 Gray St –street edge 5252 Exhibit I - Page 3 of 4 Erin Dreeszen November 6, 2025 Page 4 Summary A sound wall was installed along the South property line. The sound level was measured at the South property line (just south of the new wall), and at three locations in the neighborhood with Autowash equipment running. Measurements were taken with 3 vacuums running and the dryers in the west-most 2, west-most 3, and all 4 of the wash bays.The background sound levels were also measured for reference. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this further. Sincerely, Jeff Kwolkoski, P.E., INCE Bd. Cert. Senior Acoustical Engineer Jeff Kwolkoski Digitally signed by Jeff KwolkoskiDN: C=US, E=jeffk@waveengineering.us, O=Wave Engineering, CN=Jeff Kwolkoski Date: 2025.11.06 15:01:47-07'00' Exhibit I - Page 4 of 4 1 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY Meeting Date: July 14, 2022 Applicant/Attendees: Dennis Dreeszen, Autowash Developer Aubrey Marsh, Hover Architecture Mark Brazee, Hover Architecture Attending Staff: Scott Cutler, Senior Planner Stephanie Stevens, Senior Planner Alayna Olivas-Loera, Planner I Rocky Macsalka, Civil Engineer II Specific Site Location: 5900 W. 44th Avenue Existing Zoning: Commercial-One (C-1) Existing Comp. Plan: Neighborhoods, Neighborhood Commercial Corridor Existing Site Conditions: The property is located between Harlan Street and Gray Street off of W. 44th Avenue. The property is zoned Commercial-One (C-1). Adjacent properties are zoned C-1 and Restricted Commercial (RC). Immediately north of the site is the Town of Lakeside. According to the Jefferson County Assessor, the site is approximately 19,450 square feet (.447 acres) in size and currently contains a self-service carwash. The property consists of Lots 2 and 4 of the Stevenson Subdivision Plat. Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: The applicant is proposing to demolish the current carwash and construct a four-bay automated carwash with an office. Access is proposed off of W. 44th Avenue with car queuing on the east side of the site. Will a neighborhood meeting need to be held prior to application submittal? A neighborhood meeting will be required. Exhibit J - Page 1 of 5 2 Planning comments: Zoning & Use The site is currently zoned C-1. The C-1 zone district was established to provide for areas with a wide range of commercial land uses which include office, general business, and retail sales and service establishments. An automatic carwash is considered a special use. Special uses are those which may or may not be appropriate based on the operational standards, site design, and surrounding neighborhood. While a carwash currently exists on the site, and modifications (including additions or full redevelopment) requires approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP). Because full redevelopment is proposed a Site Plan review is required as well. The SUP and Site Plan can be reviewed concurrently; only after these are approved may the project advance to building permit. Architecture and Site Design The proposed carwash will be subject to the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM) standards. The site is located within the Traditional Overlay District of the ASDM. The applicant should review these standards to ensure all requirements are being met. Staff recommends utilizing Gray Street as the primary frontage. The site is subject to a 0-12-foot build-to requirement where at least 60% of the site along Gray Street should contain building frontage. If the build-to requirement cannot be met entirely with building frontage, attached wing walls may be used to meet this requirement. The applicant should maintain or replace any existing fences on property lines to the west and south to provide a buffer and screening from the carwash for adjacent properties. Parking and Circulation The parking requirements are being met with this proposal. The City does not have any stacking distance requirements for carwashes. Landscaping The landscaping requirements appear to be met with this proposal. A landscape plan will need to be submitted for review at Site Plan submittal. All landscaping is required to be irrigated. Utility Providers The City of Wheat Ridge is not a full-service city. The utility and service providers for this property include: • West Metro Fire Protection District, phone: 303-989-4307 • Wheat Ridge Water District, phone: 303-424-2844 • Wheat Ridge Sanitation District, phone: 303-424-7252 All land use applications will be sent out on referral to these agencies for comment; however, staff encourages potential applicants to contact service districts ahead of time. This may help to understand any design or infrastructure requirements and potential costs associated with the proposed project. Required Fees The fee for the Neighborhood Meeting, Special Use Permit, and Site Plan is $1,050 due at time of application. Should the Special Use Permit need to be reviewed at public hearing, add $400. Building permits are based on project value and include plan review fees and use tax. Contact the Building Division to confirm fees at time of submittal. Exhibit J - Page 2 of 5 3 Note that these reflect the 2022 fee schedule. Engineering Division comments: ROW and Public Improvements The City’s subdivision regulations found in Section 26-413 of the code require that substandard roadways to be brought into compliance when a land use application is processed, such as a Site Plan. An additional 6-7 feet of ROW will be required along W. 44th Avenue. A final calculation will be determined based on the existing ROW shown on a survey. An additional 1.5 feet of ROW will be required along Gray Street along with a 15-foot corner radius dedication where Gray Street and W. 44th Avenue meet. A 5-foot attached sidewalk and 1-foot buffer will need to be constructed along Gray St. An 8-foot detached sidewalk with a 2-foot buffer on either side will need to be constructed along W. 44th Avenue. Street lighting and pedestrian lighting will be required along W. 44th Avenue. The applicant should refer to the attached Streetscape Design Manual. Drainage All developments and redevelopments are subject to the City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements. The magnitude of the proposed project will dictate what drainage improvements will be required, if any. The more impervious surface (such as buildings and pavement) added to the site, the greater the drainage requirements will be. The proposed site changes should be evaluated against the existing site drainage and approved site drainage report. Based on the pre-application meeting, changes to the already developed site are expected to be minimal and centralized to the site, therefore stormwater and detention facilities will most likely not be affected. At a minimum, changes to imperviousness and runoff should be evaluated and documented in an abbreviated drainage letter signed and sealed by a Profession Engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. The drainage letter shall include any impacts caused by increases in run-off and how they will be mitigated. In all cases the historical drainage patterns shall be maintained and detention shall operate and drain within the required timeframes per Colorado water laws. Please refer to the City’s Site Drainage Requirements for additional information. Traffic A Trip Generation Letter will be required to document any changes in traffic generation to and from the site. Access Staff recommends providing an exit-only onto Gray Street on the southeast side of the site to provide better circulation from the trash enclosure and to provide an escape route for queued cars. Land Surveying The applicant should be aware that the City utilizes its own datum for land surveying purposes. Specific information can be found on the Land Surveying webpage. Exhibit J - Page 3 of 5 4 Review Process Neighborhood Meeting The next step is to conduct a neighborhood meeting. The applicant is responsible for drafting a letter that will be delivered (via mail or hand delivery) to all property owners and current residents in a 600- foot radius of the subject property. The letter must be approved by the Community Development Department PRIOR to sending. The Community Development Department can provide the applicant with a neighborhood meeting letter template and samples, if necessary. Additionally, the Community Development Department will research the property owner and resident information from the Jefferson County records and provide the applicant with mailing labels. The applicant will coordinate with the Community Development Department on the time and location of the neighborhood meeting. The meeting may be held in one of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Building conference rooms, virtually on Zoom, or any other location the applicant desires. Staff will be present at the meeting to facilitate the discussion and answer any zoning, land use, and process related questions. However, the applicant will lead the meeting and inform the audience about the proposal. Special Use Permit Application Once the neighborhood meeting is complete, a formal application may be submitted. The SUP application will be assigned a case number and case manager. The case manager will be the applicant’s point of contact at the City for the duration of the case processing. The case manager will review the case and sent it out on referral to City and outside agencies for review. The referral period is 15 days, during which time all departments and agencies may submit comments on the application. These comments, as well as those from the case manager, may require modifications to the application. Once review of the application is complete, the property must be posted. This posting lasts 10 consecutive days and requires a sign to be posted on the property. Additionally, the Community Development Department will send out written notification of the SUP request to all adjacent property owners. If no legitimate complaints are received during this posting period, the Special Use Permit application may be reviewed and decided upon administratively. If a legitimate complaint is received by the Community Development Department during this posting period, the Special Use Permit will be automatically forwarded to the City Council for a public hearing and decision. If the application is reviewed administratively and denied, the applicant can appeal the decision to the City Council. If the case is forwarded to City Council due to receipt of legitimate objections, or due to appeal by the applicant, the property must be posted again. This posting period lasts 15 consecutive days and will require a sign to be posted on the property. The Community Development Department will also mail out notification of the hearing to all property owners within 600-feet of the subject site. At the public hearing before City Council, the case manager will present the case, and based on an established set of criteria present evident to recommend the approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the Special Use Permit. The applicant, and the public, will be allowed to present evidence and provide testimony in support of opposition of the Special Use Permit. The City Council will then make a decision of approval, approval with conditions, or denial based on the testimonies provided by staff, the applicant, and the public Exhibit J - Page 4 of 5 5 Site Plan This request will require a site plan, followed by building permits. Refer to the attached site plan checklist for submittal requirements. A site plan application cannot be submitted until the subdivision plat and associated documents is approved or closer to approval. Once that progress is made, a formal application may be submitted. Applications must be submitted by appointment with a planner and will not be accepted if they are incomplete. Upon submittal, a case manager will be assigned to handle the application and will be the applicant’s point of contact at the City for the duration of the site plan review process. The case manager will review the application, and once all submittal requirements are met, the application will be sent out on referral to outside service agencies (Xcel Energy, water district, fire district, etc.) and other City agencies (Public Works, Economic Development, etc.) for review. The referral period is 15 days, during which time the referral agencies and departments may submit comments on the application. These comments, as well as those from the case manager, will be forwarded to the applicant. Modifications to the site plan may be required as a result of these comments. When all comments are addressed to the satisfaction of the case manager, the application will be forwarded to the Community Development Director for the final decision. The Site Plan review process is administrative, which means there are no public hearings before City Council or Planning Commission. Please note: Approval of the Site Plan application does not mean that a building permit has been issued. Once site plan approval is attained, the applicant must submit a building permit application with the Building Division and have it approved before construction can begin. Disclaimer: Please be aware that the above comments are for general information purposes only. Staff cannot predict the outcome of any land use development application. A favorable response from staff does not obligate any decision-making body (Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Planning Commission and/or City Council) to a desired outcome. Staff will provide the best advice available given existing regulations, current policy, political climate and information submitted. Phone Numbers Lauren Mikulak – Planning Manager 303-235-2845 Stephanie Stevens – Senior Planner 303-235-2848 Scott Cutler – Senior Planner 303-235-2849 Alayna Olivas-Loera – Planner I 303-235-2852 Mark Westberg – Projects Supervisor 303-235-2863 Rocky Macsalka – Civil Engineer II 303-235-2864 Steve Art – Economic Development Manager 303-235-2806 Cornelia Orzescu – Chief Building Official 303-235-2803 Exhibit J - Page 5 of 5 Dear Neighbor: Autowash is proposing a Special Use Permit on property located at 5920 W. 44th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. A virtual neighborhood meeting will be held on Tuesday, August 30, 2022, at 6:00 pm online via Zoom. You can join us by phone or through a device: 1. Join by phone by dialing 1-669-900-6833 with meeting ID 823 4114 3400 2. Join on a smartphone, tablet, or computer at zoom.com/join using this login information: • Meeting ID 823 4114 3400 • Passcode 720582 The purpose of the request is to allow Autowash to rebuild/refresh the existing car wash into a new automated car wash. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that prior to any application for Special Use Permit an applicant must notify all residents and property owners within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and to give the neighborhood a forum to express their concerns, issues and desires. A Staff Planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policies and regulations and the process involved, however, the Planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is [delete for zone change, keep for SUP: the administrative process by the Community Development Director and/or] the public hearing in front of City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you submit written comments during the public notice period and/or attend the public hearing. The neighborhood meeting is an informal setting that provides an opportunity for you to understand the scope of the proposed project and the process for review. You will have the opportunity to speak with the applicant and city staff and to ask any question that you may have related to the project. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Division at: (303) 235-2846. If you are unable to attend the meeting, you may mail comments or concerns to: City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 *NOTE TO APPLICANT* You MUST retype this form with all the correct information and submit to the Case Planner for review BEFORE mailing. Applicants are encouraged to use their own letterhead Exhibit K - Page 1 of 2 Rev. 4/6/15 Exhibit K - Page 2 of 2 City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us June 27, 2024 Christian Tidwell Hover Architecture 383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 175 Englewood, CO 80112 Subject: WSP-23-01, SUP-23-01, MS-24-04 – Autowash Lakeside Mr. Tidwell: Please allow this letter to serve as confirmation that your site plan, special use permit, and subdivision plat applications for Autowash Lakeside have been approved by the City of Wheat Ridge. You may now submit to the Community Development Department black line mylars of the site plan, CDs, and plat with the surveyor’s certificate and owner’s certificate signed (in black ink, preferably with a thin black sharpie or similar pen). The following fees will be assessed when you submit the mylar to the City: • Recording fee: to be determined based on final number of pages submitted Once the mylars and SIA are submitted, they will be routed for City signatures and recorded with Jefferson County. You will be emailed with the Jefferson County reception numbers for your records. Your building permit may be issued once the mylars and SIA have been received by the City. Sincerely, Alayna Olivas-Loera Planner II cc: WSP-23-01, SUP-23-01, MS-24-04 case file Exhibit L - Page 1 of 1 Special Use Permit Approval WHEREAS, an application was filed by Hover Architecture for approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP) for a carwash use at 5900 W. 44th Avenue and zoned Commercial-One (Case No. SUP-23-01); and WHEREAS, sign and letter notice was completed as required by Section 26-114 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (the “Code”) and no objections were received; and WHEREAS, the application is eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, staff finds that the application may be approved based on the criteria for review in Section 26-114 of the Code. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a Special Use Permit is granted for a car wash use at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, based on the following findings of fact: 1. The special use will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 2. The special use will not create or contribute to blight in the neighborhood by virtue of physical or operational characteristics. 3. The special use will not create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing zoning for the property. 4. The special use will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off the site. 5. The property is appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. 6. The special use will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. 7. There is a history of compliance by the applicant and/or property owner with Code requirements and prior conditions, if any, regarding the subject property. 8. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. 9. The proposed special use promotes goals and outcomes from applicable portions of the City’s comprehensive plan and any subarea plan applicable to the subject property. And with the following conditions: 1. The special use shall be consistent with the representations depicted in the application materials. 2. The architectural upgrades and site plan modifications shall be consistent with the SUP Site Plan and Elevations. 3. A building permit shall be obtained from the Wheat Ridge Building Division to complete all new construction. Exhibit M - Page 1 of 2 2 4. The approval of this special use is granted to the applicant and may not be inherited by subsequent operators. 5. A Public Improvement Agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of a vertical building permit. _________________________________ _______________________________ Lauren Mikulak, AICP Date Community Development Director January 16, 2024 Exhibit M - Page 2 of 2 City of Wheat Ridge Commercial New Structure PERMIT - 202400776 PERMIT NO:202400776 ISSUED:07/03/2024 JOB ADDRESS:5900 W 44th Ave EXPIRES:07/03/2025 JOB DESCRIPTION:New Commercial Building for Lakeside Autowash. To include 4 automatic wash bays, 1 equipment room, and 1 employee restroom. Total SQFT 3539 *** CONTACTS *** OWNER (303)257-0389 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE LLC ARCH (720)773-2800 Troy Kirschman SUB (720)838-4342 CHRIS ORLOWSKI 100293 BUD'S MECHANICAL SUB (720)323-2689 AARON VOORHEES AND PETER CHAPA 210930 ASLAN CORPORATION SUB (303)234-1235 STEVE SULLIVAN 018768 CARRY THE LIGHT ELECTRIC GC (720)323-2689 AARON VOORHEES AND PETER CHAPA 210930 ASLAN CORPORATION *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE:UA / Unassigned USE:UA / Unassigned SUBDIVISION CODE:UA / Unassigned BLOCK/LOT#:0 / *** FEE SUMMARY ***ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION:2,400,000.00 FEES Engin. Review Fee 1,200.00 Total Valuation 0.00 Permit Fee 12,202.05 Plan Review Fee 7,931.33 Use Tax 50,400.00 ** TOTAL ** 71,733.38 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** Approval from presiding fire department required prior to final building inspection sign-off. All roughs to be done at Framing Inspection. A printed copy of the permit and city stamped on-site plans must be available on-site for all inspections. Approved per plans and red-line notes on plans. Must comply with 2018 IBC, 2020 NEC and all applicable City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Codes. Work is subject to field inspections. **Prior to final inspection approval - As-builts are required before approval of the Building Final Inspection and Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. Per the City Municipal Code Section 5-46 Construction activities are limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m to 7:00 p.m. of the same calendar day. Construction activities includes all activities related to the building, repair, maintenance or alteration of a building or structure for which a permit is required by this chapter, by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation: Pouring concrete and idling of concrete mixing trucks; operating construction-related equipment; performing outside construction work for the purposes of erection, demolition, excavation, alteration or repair of any building, structure or project; operating a pile driver, power shovel, pneumatic hammer, derrick, power hoist or other construction-type device; and loading and unloading of construction materials or idling of delivery trucks. Zoning conditions: Exhibit N - Page 1 of 3 Approved per Case Nos. WSP-23-01, SUP-23-01 and MS-24-04. No C.O. may be issued until public improvements are complete as identified in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. Prior to project completion or granting of a Certificate of Occupancy, an As-Built Survey or Improvement Survey Plat shall be submitted to the City. As part of the foundation inspections and PRIOR TO proceeding with any further construction/inspections, a completed, signed and sealed, Foundation Setback and Elevation Certification shall be submitted to the City for review. The certification form shall be fully completed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the state of Colorado, stating that the foundation was constructed in compliance with all applicable minimum setback and elevation requirements of the City. Owner/Contractor is responsible for locating property lines and constructing improvements according to the approved plan and required development standards. The City is not responsible for inaccurate information submitted within the plan set and any construction errors resulting from inaccurate information. All landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan prior to C.O.. If unable to install because it is outside of planting season, generally October - June, a landscape escrow agreement with financial guarantee in the amount of 125% of the cost of the installation shall be required. All parking and driving areas shall be in conformance with Section 26-501 of the Zoning and Development Code. Site signage requires separate permit. The issuance of a building permit shall not be construed to be approval of a business license. â€¢ Prior to issuance of the first C.O. for the building, a Grading Certification Letter and a Drainage Certification letter shall be required from the Engineer of Record certifying that the final grading and drainage infrastructure has been completed and is in general Conformance with the approved Plans and Drainage Report or Letter. â€¢ For any work in the public right-of-way, a ROW construction permit shall be required prior to commencement of any work. Contact the Public Works department at 303-205-7615. â€¢ The applicant will be responsible for containing all construction activities within the site boundaries and repairing any damage to the existing public improvements as a direct result of related construction traffic. â€¢ Also, the contractor will be responsible for maintaining all affected roadways on a regular basis such that they remain free of construction debris and tracking from construction traffic accessing the site. Exhibit N - Page 2 of 3 City of Wheat Ridge Commercial New Structure PERMIT - 202400776 PERMIT NO:202400776 ISSUED:07/03/2024 JOB ADDRESS:5900 W 44th Ave EXPIRES:07/03/2025 JOB DESCRIPTION:New Commercial Building for Lakeside Autowash. To include 4 automatic wash bays, 1 equipment room, and 1 employee restroom. Total SQFT 3539 I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications, applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorizedby the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with this permit. I further attest that I am legally authorized to include all entities named within this document as parties to the work to beperformed and that all work to be performed is disclosed in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of OWNER or CONTRACTOR (Circle one) Date 1.This permit was issued based on the information provided in the permit application and accompanying plans and specifications and issubject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures. 2.This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing andreceived prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the original permit fee. 3.If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees and procedures for approval of any new permit. Re-issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion ofthe Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed. 4.No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a change of the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5.The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection ServicesDivision. 6.The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any provision of anyapplicable code or any ordinance or regulation of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to field inspection. _______________________________________________07/03/2024 Signature of Chief Building Official Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. Exhibit N - Page 3 of 3 OWNER: AUTOWASH LAKESIDE LLC PO BOX 865 Arvada, CO 80001-0865 CONTRACTOR:ASLAN CORPORATION PO BOX 4121 Greenwood Village, CO 80112 PARCEL:39-244-08-002 5900 W 44th Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80212-7426 ZONING:UA TYPE OF CONST:V-B OCCUPANCY:B OCC LOAD:4 CODE EDITION:2018 ICC/2020 NEC SPRINKLERS:No FOR THE PURPOSE: CNW:Commercial New Structure Chief Building Official Exhibit O - Page 1 of 2 Renee Meriaux Planning/Zoning Administrator 7500 W. 29th Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033-6713 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Permit#: 202400776 Date: 02/10/25 5900 W 44th Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80212-7426 This certificate verifies that the building constructed and/or the use proposed of the building and/or premises, under the above permit number and on property described below, does comply with the Wheat Ridge Building Code, Zoning and other related land use and development laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, and may be occupied for the use specified. Limitations/Stipulations:None No change shall be made in the Use of this building without prior notice and a new CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY from the City of Wheat Ridge Certificate MUST be posted by front door of commercial occupancies Exhibit O - Page 2 of 2 City of Wheat Ridge LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 291h Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) NOTE: Land use applications must be submitted BY APPOINTMENT with a planner. Incomplete applications will not be accepted—refer to submittal checklists. Applicant Mark Brazee/ Hover Architecture Phone 720-541-3013 Email mbbrazee@hoverarchitecture.com Address, City, State, Zip 383 Inverness Pkwy., Suite 175, Englewood, CO. 80112 Owner Dennis Dreeszen Phone 303-514-0905 Email dennis@autowashco.com Address, City, State, Zip 9525 E. 40th, #110 - Avenue, Denver, CO 80238 Contact Mark Brazee Phone 720-541-3013 Email mbbrazee@hoverarchitecture.com Address, City, State, Zip 383 Inverness Pkwy., Suite 175, Englewood, CO. 80112 (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the stall report prior to Public 1-learing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): 5900 W. 44th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO. 80212 Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): 0 Change of Zone or Zone Conditions 3 Planned Development (ODP, SDP) 3 Planned Building Group 3 Temporary Use, Building, Sign Variance/Waiver (from Section 26- 0 Special Use Permit CI Conditional Use Permit CI Site Plan 3 Concept Plan 3 Right of Way Vacation 3 Subdivision — specify type: 0 Administrative (up to 3 lots) 1:11 Minor (4 or 5 lots) 0 Major (6 or more lots) CI Other: Detailed description of request: Hover Architecture is pleased to present a new Autowash Project on W 44th Ave in Wheat Ridge, CO. This project includes the demolition of a current self-service car wash to make way for a new automatic car wash with four bays. Vehicles will enter from West 44th Avenue and travel around to the South of the building to access the pay stations and bays available. Stacking is available for 8 vehicles along with four vac-1111m Ctallc and nrIP ar.raccihlp narkinn cnarp (InrP emu Inh th p car wach nu ictn I cute that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, lam acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behp DARA WHEATLEY Notarized Signature of Applicant State of Colorado County of 7:i /Äf--ss NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20214041520 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 10/20/2025 The foregoing instrument (Land Use Processing Application) was acknowledged by me this I , — day of r.ail , 20 41 by 1,, 7) 444»i-v'S eoz-k-U-C. My commission expires Fee $ Case No. Comp Plan Design. Receipt No. Quarter Section Map Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager Assessor's Parcel No, Current Zoning Current Use Size (acres or sqft) Proposed Zoning Proposed Use To be filled out by staff: Date received Rev 1/22/ 2016 Exhibit P - Page 1 of 1 385 Inverness Parkway, Suite 190 • Englewood, CO 80112 Page 1 of 2 Voice: 720.773.2800 385 INVERNESS PARKWAY, SUITE 190 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 PROJECT NARRATIVE DATE: 2/10/2023 NAME: Autowash Lakeside SECTION 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION CLIENT INFORMATION: Name: Mark Brazee on behalf of Dennis Dreeszen Address: 383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 1175, Englewood, CO 80122 Phone Number: (720) 534-3013 Email Address: mbbrazee@hoverarchitecture.com Company Name: Hover Architecture SITE LOCATION: Address: 5900 W 44th Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80212 County: Jefferson County Subdivision: Stevenson Block, Lot: Lot 0002 Parcel #: 39-244-08-002 Lot Size: 0.45 Acres (19,602 SF) PROJECT NARRATIVE: Hover Architecture is pleased to present a new Autowash Project at 5900 W 44th Ave in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. This project includes the demolition of a current self-service car wash to make way for a new automatic car wash with four wash bays. Vehicles will enter from West 44th Avenue and travel around the west side of the building to access the 5 vacuum stations, including one accessible parking space, or proceed to the south of the building to access the pay stations and wash bays. Stacking is available for 8 vehicles, 2 per lane wash bay, on the south side of the building. Once through the car wash, customers will exit the lot back onto West 44th Avenue. An exit only lane allows vehicles, including sanitation and emergency vehicles, to exit the property onto Gray Street. The landscaping will include deciduous and evergreen trees, deciduous, evergreen, and broadleaf evergreen shrubs, and ornamental grasses. Most of the landscaping will be planted along the perimeter of the property, with additional plantings at the north and south end of the row of vacuum/parking stalls on the west side of the site and few additional plants adjacent to the trash enclosure between the wash bay stacking lanes near the south side of the property. The landscaping plan, notes and details are shown on sheets 3 and 4. Exhibit Q - Page 1 of 2 385 Inverness Parkway, Suite 190 • Englewood, CO 80112 Page 2 of 2 Voice: 720.773.2800 The proposed building will be 3,539 square feet, 30-feet tall, and consist of four automatic wash bays, 2 on each side of an equipment room. It will be a concrete cast-in-place structure and finished in brick wall panels, exterior insulation finish system, metal wall panels and a metal screen wall. Materials and their location on the building are shown on the Building Elevation Sheets 6 and 9. The metal screen wall and the building are 60% of the street frontage along Gray Street. Site details, including trash enclosure details, are located on sheet 5. Lighting on the property will only occur on the building and at the pay stations to south of the building. No lighting is proposed along the west and south property lines, adjacent to the commercial and residential structures. The Photometric Plan and lighting details are on sheets 7 and 8. PROJECT VICINITY MAP: Google Maps URL: 5900 W 44th Ave - Google Maps Exhibit Q - Page 2 of 2 W 41ST AVE W 44TH AVE HA R L A N S T GR A Y S T SITE SPECIFIC CIVIL GENERAL NOTES: 1.WHERE NEW WORK MEETS EXISTING FEATURES TO REMAIN, ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES IN WRITING. 2.STREET PAVING AND CURBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE, AND, IF DAMAGED, SHALL BE REPLACED TO MEET CDOT AND/OR MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATIONS IN MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. 3.PROVIDE SMOOTH VERTICAL CURVES THROUGH HIGH AND LOW POINTS INDICATED BY SPOT ELEVATIONS WITHIN PARKING LOT PAVEMENT. PROVIDE UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING GRADES. AVOID RIDGES AND DEPRESSIONS. 4.NEW ELEVATIONS INDICATE FINISHED CONDITIONS. FOR ROUGH GRADING ELEVATIONS ALLOW FOR THICKNESS OF NEW PAVING (ROADS, WALKS, DRIVE, ETC.) OR TOPSOIL AS SHOWN. 5.ALL ASPHALT BUTT JOINTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS (IF APPLICABLE) AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY MILLING. 6.ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CURRENT OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT ARE HEREIN INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE. 7.ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST COMPLY WITH THE STATE OF COLORADO PERMITTING PROCESS FOR "STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY "AND ANY JURISDICTIONAL STORMWATER DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS. FOR INFORMATION CONTACT COLORADO DEPT. OF HEALTH, WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION. 8.IF CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, A STATE CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING DISCHARGE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGES TO A STORM SEWER, CHANNEL, IRRIGATION DITCH, ANY STREET THAT IS TRIBUTARY TO THE AFOREMENTIONED FACILITIES, OR ANY WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. NO DISCHARGES SHALL BE ALLOWED TO THE SANITARY SEWER. 9.ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS AND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE UTILITY OWNER. 10.ANY AREA WITHIN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE OR STATE R.O.W. OR OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE USED BY THE GENERAL OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE STATE OR CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AS IT WAS FOUND PRIOR TO NEW CONSTRUCTION, EXCEPT WHERE NEW WORK IS SHOWN. 11.WHEN AN EXISTING DRAINAGE ROUTE, EITHER A STORM SEWER OR WATERWAY, IS INTERRUPTED DUE TO SEWER INSTALLATION OR ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE DRAINAGE ROUTE SHALL BE REESTABLISHED TO ORIGINAL CONDITIONS BY THE END OF THE SAME WORK DAY. DRAINAGE MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 12.FOR REGULATED UTILITY LOCATIONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNCC AT 1-800-922-1987. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES SHOULD BE CONTACTED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR LOCATION OF ALL NON-REGULATED UTILITY LOCATIONS. PLEASE CALL FOR LOCATES 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. 13.SIX (6") INCHES OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL NON-BUILD AREAS WERE NEW GRADING IS SHOWN ON PLANS (GRADING SHOWN IS TO TOP OF TOPSOIL). 14.NO PAVEMENT WORK IS ALLOWED ADJACENT TO CURB AND GUTTER FOR A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS AFTER CURB PLACEMENT. 15.BACK FILLING OF CURB IS PROHIBITED UNTIL THREE DAYS AFTER CURB PLACEMENT. 16.ASPHALT JOINTS FOR BINDER, AND SURFACE COURSES ARE TO BE STAGGERED. 17.BAND-SEAL CONNECTORS SHALL BE USED TO JOIN PIPES OF DISSIMILAR MATERIAL. 18.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ONE (1) SIGNED COPY OF THE PLANS (APPROVED BY CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE), ONE (1) COPY OF THE APPROPRIATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES AND A COPY OF ANY PERMITS AND EXTENSION AGREEMENTS NEEDED AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. 19.EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR IN THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SPECIFICATIONS LATEST EDITION SHALL GOVERN. 20.ALL EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM AVAILABLE SURVEYS AND RECORDS. THEREFORE, THEIR LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS MUST BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY. THERE MAY BE OTHER FACILITIES, THE EXISTENCE OF WHICH ARE NOT PRESENTLY KNOWN. CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER/ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO STARTING HIS WORK. PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C1.0 CO V E R S H E E T LL G AC L LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 2 AND 4, STEVENSON SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO ALSO KNOWN BY STREET NUMBER AS:5900 WEST 44TH AVE, WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 BASIS OF BEARING ALL BEARINGS ARE PER ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED BY AEI CONSULTANTS, #2500 CAMINO DIABLO, WALNUT CREEK, CA, 94597, AEI JOB NUMBER 466128, "BEARINGS ARE BASED ON TRUE NORTH PER GPS OBSERVATIONS USING COLORADO STATE PLANE CENTRAL ZONE, BEARINGS MATCH CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COORDINATE SYSTEM. VERTICAL DATUM / BENCHMARKS: PROJECT BENCHMARK CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS DATA CONTROL POINT #14909 WITH A PUBLISHED ELEVATION 5373.62 FEET (NAVD 88), AS SHOWN ON CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION & PROCEDURE DOCUMENT DATED MAY 19, 2017 SITE BENCHMARK FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, ELEVATION =5375.40 (NAVD88). VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 500' CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 5900 W 44TH AVENUE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SITE APPLICANT AUTOWASH LLLP 7005 E. 46TH AVENUE DRIVE, UNIT B DENVER, CO 80216 PH: 303.514.0905 CONTACT: DENNIS DREESZEN EMAIL: DENNIS@AUTOWASHCO.COM ARCHITECT HOVER ARCHITECTURE 8920 BARROWS BLVD, #102 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 PH: 720.534.3013 CONTACT: MARK BRAZEE EMAIL: MBBRAZEE@HOVERARCHITECTURE.COM CIVIL ENGINEER PROOF CIVIL 800 W. 8TH AVE, #104 DENVER, CO 80204 PH: 303.325.5709 CONTACT: ADRIAN C. LUCE, PE EMAIL: ALUCE@PROOFCIVIL.COM SURVEYOR GILLIANS LAND CONSULTANTS PO BOX 746358 ARVADA, CO 80006 PH: 303.972.6640 CONTACT: ROBERT E. HARRIS, PLS SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C1.0 COVER SHEET C1.1 DENVER WATER NOTES C2.0 DEMO AND INITIAL EC PLAN C2.1 INTERIM EC PLAN C2.2 EC DETAILS C2.3 EC DETAILS C3.0 HORIZONTAL CONTROL, SIGNAGE & STRIPING PLAN C4.0 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C4.1 STREET FL PROFILE C4.2 STREET SECTIONS C5.0 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C6.0 DETAILS C6.1 DETAILS C6.2 DETAILS C6.3 DETAILS CITY OF WHEATRIDGE GENERAL NOTES FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT: 1.ALL WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ("CITY") ENGINEERING REGULATIONS AND DESIGN STANDARDS. IF NO CITY STANDARD EXISTS, THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION M-STANDARDS SHALL APPLY. 2.AN APPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND A MUNICIPAL CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY WORK COMMENCING WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL REQUIRE AN APPROVED STATE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3.IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER AND CITY INSPECTOR OF ANY PROBLEM ENCOUNTERED WHICH WOULD ALTER THE ORIGINAL DESIGN OR CAUSE NON-CONFORMANCE WITH THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR ANY ELEMENT OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO ITS CONSTRUCTION. 4.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO RESOLVE CONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS DUE TO CHANGED CONDITIONS OR DESIGN ERRORS ENCOUNTERED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE PROGRESS OF ANY PORTION OF THE PROPOSED WORK. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE CITY'S INSPECTOR, THE MODIFICATIONS PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPER TO THE APPROVED PLANS INVOLVE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO THE CHARACTER OF THE WORK OR TO FUTURE CONTIGUOUS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS, THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING REVISED PLANS TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY FURTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED TO THAT PORTION OF WORK. ANY IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORIGINAL APPROVED PLANS OR APPROVED REVISED PLANS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED PER THE APPROVED PLANS. 5.UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER- THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO FOR LOCATION ON UNDERGROUND GAS, ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. CALL CO811 AT 1.800.922.1987. 6.ALL UTILITY POLES SHALL BE RELOCATED PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. 7.WITH NOTIFICATION OF THE RESPECTIVE OWNER, ADJUST RIMS OF ALL CLEANOUTS, MANHOLES, VALVE COVERS AND SURVEY MONUMENTS PRIOR TO THE FINAL PAVING LIFT. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LIGHTS, SIGNS, BARRICADES, FLAGMEN OR OTHER DEVICES NECESSARY TO PROVIDE FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN INGRESS AND EGRESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE WORK THROUGHOUT THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A WRITTEN AGREEMENT FROM THE AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNER(S) IMPACTED BY THIS ACCESS. 10.PRIOR TO THE FINAL LIFT OF SURFACE PAVEMENT ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY MAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS STUBBED OUT BEYOND THE BACK OF CURB/SIDEWALK LINE WHEN ALLOWED BY THE UTILITY. SERVICE FROM PUBLIC UTILITIES AND FROM SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR EACH LOT IN SUCH A MANNER THAT WILL NOT BE NECESSARY TO DISTURB THE STREET PAVEMENT, CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK WHEN CONNECTIONS ARE MADE. 11.UPON COMPLETION OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH “AS-BUILT” PLANS (RECORD DRAWINGS) PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK AND ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY/COMPLETION. SUBMIT TO ENGINEERING DIVISION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THE AS-BUILT PLANS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: a.1 SCANNED PDF OF THE SIGNED & SEALED HARDCOPY, AND b.1 ELECTRONIC AUTOCAD DWG FILE FORMAT. (ALL SHX AND c.EXTERNAL REFERENCE FILES MUST BE INCLUDED PRIOR TO d.ACCEPTANCE). 12.AS-BUILT PLANS SHALL INCLUDE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT: a.STREETS: CROSS-SECTIONS AT REGULAR STATIONS AND OFFSETS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHALL BE PROVIDED. b.DETENTION POND: SUFFICIENT SPOT ELEVATIONS FOR THE ENGINEER-OF-RECORD TO DETERMINE THE PROPER POND VOLUME. c.STORM SEWER: ELEVATIONS ARE TO BE INCLUDED FOR, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. MANHOLES (PIPE INVERTS & RIM), DROP INLETS (FL GRATE AND INVERTS), OUTLET STRUCTURE(S). TRICKLE CHANNEL(S), FES, HEADWALLS AND OTHER DRAINAGE-RELATED STRUCTURES. OFFSETS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHALL BE PROVIDED. d.LIGHTING: THE LOCATION OF ALL STREETLIGHTS, PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS, PULL-BOXES, AND ELECTRIC METERS. e.SIGNS: ALL REGULATORY SIGNAGE WITHIN THE PROJECT SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE PLANS. f.IRRIGATION: THE LOCATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ANY IRRIGATION CONTROLLER BOXES, SPRINKLER HEADS, AND SPRINKLER VALVES THAT ARE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR AT 303.205.7615 AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE DESIRED INSPECTION. 14.NO PORTION OF THE STREET MAY BE FINAL PAVED UNTIL ALL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS, DESIGNED TO SERVE THE 15.STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTS SHALL BE SET PRIOR TO FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT. MONUMENT HARDWARE AND RANGE BOXES WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE UPON REQUEST (303.205.7615). 16.SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF INITIAL EXPOSURE OR SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER GRADING IS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE IN A GIVEN AREA (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY). THIS MAY REQUIRE MULTIPLE MOBILIZATIONS FOR SEEDING AND MULCHING 17.ANY DISTURBED AREA OR STOCKPILE NOT AT FINAL GRADE THAT IS TO BE LEFT EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF PLACEMENT OR DISTURBANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE TEMPORARY SEEDING STANDARDS. IF THE SEASON OR STOCKPILE MATERIAL PROHIBITS TEMPORARY SEEDING, THE DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS OR STRAW MULCH AND TACKIFIER, AND ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 18.STOCKPILES OF ANY MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED FULLY WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND NO LESS THAN 100-FEET FROM THE BANKS OF THE NEAREST DRAINAGEWAY. STOCKPILE AREAS SHALL BE SIZED TO FULLY CONTAIN THE MATERIAL BASED ON MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE STOCKPILE SIDE SLOPES OF 3 (HORIZONTAL) TO 1 (VERTICAL) CONSTRUCTION. 19.PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED TO DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL GRADE IS ACHIEVED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE, OR TO DISTURBED AREAS THAT MAY NOT BE AT FINAL GRADE, BUT ARE TO BE LEFT DORMANT FOR A PERIOD OF TIME OF MORE THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS. 20.ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY PER INSTRUCTIONS OF THE CITY INSPECTOR. 21.IF THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE FOR THE PROJECT IS GREATER THAN AN ACRE IN SIZE, EVEN IF THE PROJECT IS TO BE COMPLETED IN PHASES, REFER TO THE APPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 22.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PROPER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303.205.7615) PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 23.NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.205.7615, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK). 24.PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS AT 303.205.7615. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY DISTRICTS FOR THIS MEETING. 25.REQUIRED MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPES: a.SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPES SHALL BE BETWEEN 1.70% AND 2.00% b.GRADED & LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL NOT EXCEED 4:!. 26.PEDESTRIAN AND STREET LIGHTING TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRES TWO (2) SEPARATE AND DISTINCT PERMITS: a.ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. A ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE LIGHT BASES ONLY. THE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH THE CONSTRUCTION DIVISION (303.205.7615). THE APPLICABLE SHEETS FROM THE APPROVED CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHOWING PLACEMENT OF THE LIGHT BASES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH THE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION. b.BUILDING PERMIT. A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS ONLY. THE (ELECTRICAL) BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRES A COMPLETE SET OF ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLANS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ONE-LINE DIAGRAMS AND SPECIFIC COMPONENT INFORMATION THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL TO THE BUILDING DIVISION (303.235.2876). THE ELECTRICAL PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY BOTH THE BUILDING DIVISION AND PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS. 27.ALL NEW STREETS SHALL FULLY ADHERE TO THE CITY'S NEW ASPHALT STREET CONSTRUCTION POLICY FOR DEVELOPMENTS POLICY DATED DECEMBER 21, 2018 (THE “POLICY”). THE POLICY REQUIRES THAT FOR NEW ROADWAYS ONLY THE BOTTOM LIFT OF ASPHALT MAY BE PLACED AND MUST BE MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE WINTER CYCLE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE TOP FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT. REFER TO THE POLICY HYPERLINK FOUND ON THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS/DEVELOPMENT REVIEW WEB PAGE FOR ALL REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THE POLICY. 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 1 of 81 PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C1.1 DE N V E R W A T E R N O T E S LL G AC L MATERIAL SPECIFICATION DESCRIPTION 33 05 19 DUCTILE IRON PIPE 30 05 31.13 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PRESSURE PIPE 33 05 19: 33 05 31.13 DUCTILE IRON WATERWORKS FITTINGS 33 14 19 RESILIENT SEATED GATE VALVES 33 15 00 FLANGED RUBBER SEATED BUTTERFLY VALVES 33 14 17 TAPPING VALVES MECHANICAL JOINT TYPE 33 14 17 FABRICATED CARBON STEEL AND STAINLESS STEEL TAPPING SLEEVES 33 14 11 CAST IRON VALVE BOXES 33 14 20 DRY BARREL FIRE HYDRANTS 33 05 19 POLYETHYLENE ENCASEMENT MATERIAL 33 14 17 BRASS AND BRONZE GOODS 33 05 61 CONCRETE VAULTS 33 05 19: 33 05 31.13 MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINT 33 14 11 BOLTED SLEEVE-TYPE COUPLINGS 33 14 11 FLANGED JOINT ACCESSORIES DENVER WATER NOTES FROM REVISION DATE SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND WATER NOTES:MAIN EXTENSION NOTES: PROJECTS LOCATED IN DISTRIBUTOR CONTRACT AREAS SHALL REQUIRE THE DISTRICT TO CONTACT DENVER WATER’S CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PERSONNEL AT 303-628-6671, PRIOR TO THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENVER WATER’S ENGINEERING STANDARDS, CAPITAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS (CPCS), MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS, AND DRAWINGS. ALL MAIN INSTALLATIONS/SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS WILL BE APPROVED AND INSPECTED BY DENVER WATER. FIELD CHANGE DIRECTIVES MADE BY DISTRIBUTION INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS BY THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTORS SHALL MAINTAIN A COPY OF THE CURRENT ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND CPCS ONSITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEE THE CHART BELOW FOR A QUICK REFERENCE TO THE FREQUENTLY USED MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. MATERIAL SPECIFICATION QUICK REFERENCES: AWG 12 SOLID COPPER WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL NON-METALLIC WATER MAINS. THE DEPTH OF COVER OVER THE PIPE, MEASURED FROM OFFICIAL STREET GRADE TO THE TOP OF THE PIPE, SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4-1/2 FEET AND SHALL BE KNOWN AS THE COVER OVER THE PIPE. IF DIFFICULTIES ARISE WHEN CROSSING INTERFERENCE, AND WHERE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY DENVER WATER, DEVIATIONS FROM 4-1/2 FEET OF COVER WILL BE PERMITTED. THE COVER OVER THE PIPE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4-1/2 FEET AND A MAXIMUM OF 10 FEET WITH DENVER WATER APPROVAL. ANY CHANGES IN ALIGNMENT AND GRADE SHALL BE AUTHORIZED BY DENVER WATER AND SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL FITTINGS. THE DEFLECTION OF JOINTS IS PERMITTED ONLY WHEN INSTALLING PIPE ON HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL CURVES. PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF WATER MAINS, ROAD CONSTRUCTION MUST HAVE PROGRESSED TO AT LEAST THE SUB-GRADE STATE. SUB-GRADE IS DEFINED AS AN ELEVATION OF NO MORE THAN 7 INCHES BELOW THE FINISHED STREET GRADE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL VALVE BOXES, MANHOLE LIDS, TRACER WIRE BOXES, FIRE HYDRANTS TO THE FINAL FINISHED GRADE BENDS, TEES, FIRE HYDRANTS, BLOW-OFFS, AND PLUGS AT DEAD-END MAINS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM THRUST WITH MECHANICAL RESTRAINT AND CONCRETE KICK BLOCKS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENVER WATER'S ENGINEERING STANDARDS AMD CPCS. VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED ON PROPERTY LINE EXTENSIONS, EXCEPT FOR TAPPING SLEEVE WHERE AN ADDITIONAL VALVE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE TAPPING SLEEVE. ADDITIONAL VALVE LOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED PER DENVER WATER'S CONTRUCTION ENGINEERING PERSONAL. UTILITY CROSSINGS SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM CLEARANCE OF 18-INCHES FROM THE OUTSIDE OF THE PIPES. ONLY ONE POINT OF CONNECTION IS ALLOWED UNTIL THE TESTING OF THE NEW MAIN INSTALLATIONS IS COMPLETE. NEWLY INSTALLED WATER MAINS AND FIRE SERVICE LINES SHALL BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENVER WATER ENGINEERING STANDARDS, SECTION 8.22. THE TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED, AND THE PIPE EXPOSED FOR INSPECTION AT ANY LOCATION ON THE PROJECT, WHEN REQUESTED BY DENVER WATER. THE STERILIZATION AND FLUSHING OF MAINS SHALL BE INSPECTED AND CERTIFIED BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAVING JURISDICTION; ONE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DENVER WATER. THE CERTIFICATION SHALL NOTE THE LOCATION OF THE MAIN AND STATE THE MAIN HAS BEEN INSPECTED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAVING JURISDICTION AND COMPLIES WITH THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH BY THAT DEPARTMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR: A.NOTIFYING CUSTOMERS VERBALLY OR IN WRITING WHO MAY BE AFFECTED BY A WATER OUTAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. B.OBTAINING, AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE, APPLICABLE LICENSES, PERMITS, BONDS, ETC., THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THE MAIN INSTALLATION/SYSTEM MODIFICATION. C.CONTACTING DENVER WATER'S CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PERSONNEL FOR THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING AND INSPECTION, AT 303-628-6671, AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. D.IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY IN DENVER OR IN A TOTAL SERVICE AREA AFTER WORKING HOURS, CALL DENVER WATER'S WESTSIDE DISPATCHER: 303-628-6801. IN A MASTER METER OR READ & BILL DISTRICT, PLEASE CONTACT THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE PROJECT IS TAKING PLACE. E.PAYING ALL ADDITIONAL CHARGES FOR INSPECTION OUTSIDE NORMAL WORK HOURS. NOTE: BE ADVISED THAT ON OCCASION VALVES IN OUR SYSTEM MAY BE INOPERABLE. ON SUCH OCCASIONS, IT MAY BECOME NECESSARY TO BACK UP AN ADDITIONAL BLOCK FOR THE SHUT OUT. IF THAT OCCURS, MAKE ADDITIONAL NOTIFICATIONS VERBALLY OR IN WRITING TO CUSTOMERS WITH THE MANDATORY 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE. WHEN VALVE MAINTENANCE IS REQUIRED, A DELAY OF SEVERAL DAYS SHOULD BE EXPECTED. TAP AND METER NOTES (FOR DENVER, TOTAL SERVICE, AND READ AND BILL AREAS ONLY. IN MASTER METER DISTRICTS PLEASE REFER TO THE SPECIFICATION FOR THAT DISTRICT). BEFORE ANY TAPS ARE MADE ON MAINS, TAP APPLICATIONS AND PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED AND APPROVED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR AND DENVER WATER, AND THE WATER MAIN HAS PASSED WATER QUALITY TESTING DENVER WATER WILL MAKE ALL TAPS THAT ARE 2 INCHES AND SMALLER. INDIVIDUAL SERVICE LINE PRV'S SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE LICENSEE WHEN AREA PRESSURE EXCEEDS 80 PSI SERVICES AND METERS: 1.THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST AN ON-SITE PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE METER INSPECTOR FOR ALL TAPS, SERVICE LINES, ALL METER SIZES, AND PROJECTS INVOLVING MORE THAN ONE TAP AND SERVICE. TO SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE, CALL METER INSPECTION AT 303-628-6145. 2.A COPY OF THE APPROVED PLANS WITH DENVER WATER’S APPROVAL STICKER MUST BE PRESENT ON-SITE AT THE TIME THE TAP IS MADE AND THE METER IS INSPECTED OR INSTALLED. 3.PRIOR TO THE TAP BEING MADE, THE SERVICE ADDRESS SHALL BE POSTED, AND THE CURB VALVE SHALL BE INSTALLED. UPON TAP INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST THE METER INSPECTION AFTER THE FIRST POUR OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION HAS OCCURRED. THE SERVICE ADDRESS SHALL REMAIN POSTED UNTIL THE METER SETTING PASSES INSPECTION. 4.METERS CANNOT BE SET, INSPECTED, OR SERVICES ACTIVATED, UNTIL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR BACKFLOW PREVENTION HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. CONTACT THE CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM PERSONNEL AT 303-628-5969 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 5.METER PITS AND VAULTS MUST BE SET FLUSH WITH THE FINAL GRADE OF THE LANDSCAPE, INCLUDING THE PROPER DEPTH FOR SOIL AMENDMENT. IF FINAL GRADING HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED AT THE TIME OF METER INSPECTION, THE OWNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO RAISE OR LOWER THE METER PIT/VAULT WHEN FINAL GRADE IS ESTABLISHED. ADJUSTMENT OF THE PIT MAY REQUIRE ADJUSTMENT OF THE METER SETTING WITHIN THE PIT. 6.METER SETTING, VALVES, AND SERVICE LINES FROM THE MAIN TO THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY, IF PRESENT, OR TO 5 FEET AFTER THE METER VAULT, MUST MEET ALL APPLICABLE ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND CPCS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ACTIVATION. MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED FROM THE DETAILS ON THESE PLANS TO COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT CPCS. 7.NO PRESENT OR FUTURE FENCES OR WALLS ARE PERMITTED BETWEEN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW) OR EASEMENT AND THE METER SETTING. THERE SHALL BE NO PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE OUTSIDE WALL OF THE METER PIT OR VAULT. 8.INSIDE THE CITY OF DENVER, ALL MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS WITH A SINGLE TAP, SERVICE LINE, AND METER ARE REQUIRED TO SUB-METER EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT (SEC 401.3.2 OF DENVER MODIFICATIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE, ORDINANCE NUMBER 576, SERIES OF 2004). CALL THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER PLUMBING INSPECTOR FOR INFORMATION AT 720-865-2625. 9.INSIDE THE CITY OF DENVER, ALL SERVICE LINES MUST BE INSTALLED TO AVOID EXISTING OR PROPOSED STREET TREES. CONTACT THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER’S FORESTER AT 720-913-0647 FOR INFORMATION. CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS: THE LICENSEES LISTED BELOW SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH DENVER WATER’S ENGINEERING STANDARDS, CHAPTER 5.05, BACKFLOW PREVENTION AND CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED ON THE FOLLOWING WATER SERVICE LINES: 1.COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC SERVICE LINES 2.MULTI-FAMILY DOMESTIC SERVICE LINES (DEPENDING ON POTENTIAL HAZARD) 3.FIRE SERVICE LINES 4.IRRIGATION SERVICE LINES 5.SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DOMESTIC SERVICE LINES WITH AN AUXILIARY WATER SOURCE (DUAL WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT REQUIRED) 6.RECYCLED WATER SERVICE LINES, IF SYSTEM DESIGN INCLUDES CHEMICAL INJECTION OR PUMPS. A.BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLIES INSTALLED ON RECYCLED WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AS “RECYCLED WATER”. 7. IT IS AT THE SOLE DISCRETION OF DENVER WATER’S CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL SECTION TO APPROVE OR DENY A VARIANCE REQUEST RELATED TO A PROPOSED BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION. A.BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE A MODEL MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C510 AND C511 AND SHALL HAVE MET THE SPECIFICATIONS BY THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL AND HYDRAULIC RESEARCH. B.THE LICENSEE IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A CERTIFIED AMERICAN BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSOCIATION (ABPA), OR AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SANITARY ENGINEERING (ASSE) TESTER INSPECT AND TEST THE EXISTING AND/OR NEWLY INSTALLED CONTAINMENT BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLIES ON DEDICATED DOMESTIC, IRRIGATION, FIRE AND RECYCLE WATER SERVICE LINES UPON INSTALLATION AND ANNUALLY THEREAFTER. C.WITHIN 48 HOURS OF DENVER WATER SETTING THE METER AND TURNING ON THE WATER SERVICE, THE ABPA OR ASSE TESTER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE CONTAINMENT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TEST REPORT(S) TO THE CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL OFFICE: FAX: 303-794-8325 E-MAIL: CROSSCONNECTIONCONTROL@DENVERWATER.ORG D.THERE SHALL BE NO UNPROTECTED TAKEOFFS FROM THE SERVICE LINE AHEAD OF ANY METER OR BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY LOCATED AT THE POINT OF DELIVERY TO THE CUSTOMER’S WATER SYSTEM. E.NO BRANCH LINE OR TAPS ARE ALLOWED ON DEDICATED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE LINES OR RECYCLED WATER SERVICE LINE FOR DOMESTIC (POTABLE) USE (E.G., DRINKING FOUNTAINS, WATER PLAY FEATURES, SWIMMING POOL, RESTROOM FACILITIES, ETC.) DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (DEN) REQUIREMENTS: CONTRACTORS SHALL MAINTAIN A COPY OF THE CURRENT ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND CAPITAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, WHEN APPLICABLE, ON SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. WAX TAPE, METALLIC FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENVER WATER CAPITAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,4TH EDITION SECTION 09 97 13.04. AN AMI ENDPOINT IS REQUIRED TO BE PURCHASED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE TIME OF METER INSTALLATION. CONTACT THE FOLLOWING DENVER WATER PERSONNEL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT COORDINATION AND INSPECTION SERVICES AT DEN: DEN AIRSIDE AND LANDSIDE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION A.MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION B.DENVER WATER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING - 303-628-6671 DEN CATHODIC PROTECTION INSPECTION A.MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION B.DENVER WATER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LEE BURKE 303-628-6293 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 2 of 81 SS SS SS CO CO EM ST GM M EXISTING BUILDING TO DEMOLISHED (RE: ARCH) EXISTING BUILDING TO DEMOLISHED (RE: ARCH) EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED AND/OR REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. EXISTING WATER METER AND VALVES TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING GAS SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED AND/OR REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ELECTRICAL TO BE REMOVED (TYP)EXISTING ENCLOSURE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ENCLOSURE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP) EXISTING BOLLARD TO BE REMOVED (TYP) APPROXIMATELY 16,500 SF OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO REMOVED EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING GAS METER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER TO REMOVED EXISTING SIGN TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ROCK TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ROCK TO BE REMOVED EXISTING FENCE TO REMOVED (TYP) EXISTING 41.6' DRIVE CUT TO BE REMOVED EXISTING 25.8' DRIVE CUT TO BE REMOVED SSA VTC CWA IPIP CS CS CSCSCS SF SF SF SF EXISTING SANITARY MAIN TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING GAS LINE TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING WATER MAIN TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING STORM MAIN TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING INLET TO REMAIN (TYP) PROPOSED SAWCUT (LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT) (TYP) EXISTING UTILITY POLE TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING SOI TO BE REMOVED GR A Y S T R E E T WEST 44TH AVENUE EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY TO REMAIN (TYP) PROPOSED 8.0' ROW DEDICATION (PER PLAT) PROPOSED 1.5' ROW DEDICATION (PER PLAT) EXISTING STORM MANHOLE TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING WATER VALVE TO REMAIN (TYP) PROPERTY BOUNDARY PORTIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN PUBLIC ROW TO BE FULLY REMOVED (TYP) 116± LF OF CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED (TYP) EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED BELOW GROUND (CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDED) CS 537 7 537 8 5379 537 5 537 6 PROPOSED SAWCUT (LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT) (TYP) 56± LF OF CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED (TYP) EXISTING INLET TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMOVED IP 400± SF ASPHALT MAT TO BE REMOVED (TYP) PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C2.0 DE M O A N D I N I T I A L E C P L A N LL G AC L LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER EXISTING CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION INLET PROTECTION CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL STABILIZED STAGING AREA SILT FENCE 1.INSPECTION OF ALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHALL BE REQUIRED AT THE END OF EACH DAY'S WORK, WITH NECESSARY MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS PROVIDED IMMEDIATELY. 2.STORM DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM THE ENTRY OF SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE. 3.CONSTRUCTION DELINEATOR (T-POST AND ROPE) TO BE POSTS 50 FEET ON CENTER WITH VISIBLE ROPE AND SURVEY FLAGS TO DELINEATE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES: CWA VTC SF SSA IP 5401 5401 5400 5400 LOC SAWCUT NOTE: SAWCUT LIMITS ARE SHOWN AS APPROXIMATES, ALL CONCRETE REMOVAL SHALL BE FULL PANEL/STONE REMOVAL, IE REMOVAL SHALL BE TO NEAREST JOINT. STRUCTURE DEMO NOTE: EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. THE REMOVAL OF ONSITE EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE COMPLETED BASED ON DIRECTION FROM OTHERS AND THE MEANS AND METHODS OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE DEMOLISHED PER LOCAL, STATE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. IF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ARE FOUND, INCLUDING ASBESTOS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE MITIGATION MEASURES AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. REFER TO PLANS AND REPORTS BY OTHERS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES. 0 SCALE: 1" = 5 10 20 10' N NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PROPER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 2.THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE IS 4:1. ANY SLOPES THAT MAY EXCEED THIS LIMIT SHALL BE TERRACED TO BELOW THE MAXIMUM. 3.3.NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK). 4.THE MAXIMUM CROSS-SLOPE ON THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK SHALL BE 2.0%. ANY PORTION EXCEEDING THE MAX. 2% SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT THE SOLE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. 5.PROVIDE TIE BAR REINFORCING BETWEEN INDEPENDENTLY POURED CONCRETE AND BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW CONCRETE PER CDOT STANDARD M-608-1. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (303.205.7615) REGARDING THE PLACEMENT OF THE ELECTRIC METER REQUIRED FOR THE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING WITHIN THE ROW. 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 3 of 81 M COCO CO COCO TRANS SS ST M COCO CO COCO TRANS PROPOSED SPILL CURB & GUTTER (TYP) PROPOSED DRIVE CUT PROPOSED DRIVE CUT WITH CURB RAMPS SSA VTC CWA IPIP SF SF SF SF EXISTING STORM MAIN TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING INLET TO REMAIN (TYP) PROPOSED SAWCUT (LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT (TYP) EXISTING UTILITY POLE TO REMAIN (TYP) GR A Y S T R E E T WEST 44TH AVENUE EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY TO REMAIN (TYP) PROPOSED 8.0' ROW DEDICATION (PER PLAT) EXISTING STORM MANHOLE TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN (TYP) PROPERTY BOUNDARY CS CS CSCSCSCS 5375 5375 5374 5374 5376 53 7 6 53 7 7 5377 5378 53 7 8 5379 537 9 5379 SF SF SF 5375 5375 537 6 5376 5377 537 8 5376 5377 5378 EXISTING INLET TO REMAIN (TYP) PROPOSED 1.5' ROW DEDICATION (PER PLAT) 4.0' DRAINAGE PAN (TYP) 4.0' DRAINAGE PAN PROPOSED SIDEWALK CHASE PROPOSED LAKESIDE AUTOWASH IP PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C2.1 IN T E R I M E C P L A N LL G AC L LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER EXISTING CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION INLET PROTECTION CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL STABILIZED STAGING AREA SILT FENCE 1.INSPECTION OF ALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHALL BE REQUIRED AT THE END OF EACH DAY'S WORK, WITH NECESSARY MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS PROVIDED IMMEDIATELY. 2.STORM DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM THE ENTRY OF SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE. 3.CONSTRUCTION DELINEATOR (T-POST AND ROPE) TO BE POSTS 50 FEET ON CENTER WITH VISIBLE ROPE AND SURVEY FLAGS TO DELINEATE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES: CWA VTC SF SSA IP 5401 5401 5400 5400 LOC SAWCUT NOTE: SAWCUT LIMITS ARE SHOWN AS APPROXIMATES, ALL CONCRETE REMOVAL SHALL BE FULL PANEL/STONE REMOVAL, IE REMOVAL SHALL BE TO NEAREST JOINT. STRUCTURE DEMO NOTE: EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. THE REMOVAL OF ONSITE EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE COMPLETED BASED ON DIRECTION FROM OTHERS AND THE MEANS AND METHODS OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE DEMOLISHED PER LOCAL, STATE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. IF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ARE FOUND, INCLUDING ASBESTOS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE MITIGATION MEASURES AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. REFER TO PLANS AND REPORTS BY OTHERS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES. 0 SCALE: 1" = 5 10 20 10' N 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 4 of 81 PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C2.2 EC D E T A I L S LL G AC L 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 5 of 81 PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 6 of 81 SS ST ST M COCO CO COCO TRANS N:708,447.10 E:123,901.12 N:708,447.04 E:123,925.12 N:708,405.68 E:123,938.45 N:708,364.68 E:123,938.66 N:708,345.46 E:123,938.76 N:708,345.66 E:124,013.42 N:708,365.06 E:124,013.33 N:708,406.06 E:124,013.12 N:708,304.80 E:124,020.65 N:708,320.80 E:124,020.57 N:708,299.43 E:124,018.29 N:708,345.41 E:123,929.76 N:708,323.04 E:123,970.31 N:708,322.94 E:123,982.04 L1 C1 C2 L4 C3 L6 L7 C4 L9 C5L11 L1 2 C6 L38 C16 L1 6 C17 L39 L1 9 L40 C18 C10 L23 L2 6 C11C12 L2 9 L30 L3 1 C1 3 C14 L3 4 L35 C15 L3 7 GR A Y S T R E E T EX . 5 0 ' R . O . W . / P R O P O S E D 5 1 . 5 ' R . O . W . WEST 44TH AVENUE EX. 70' R.O.W. / PROPOSED 78' R.O.W. N:708,406.08 E:124,016.62 N:708,365.08 E:124,016.83 R1.5' PROPOSED LAKESIDE AUTOWASH (5900 W. 44TH AVE.) CORNER DEDICATION (PER PLAT 60.0° (TYP) R15.0' 19.5' 5.0' 11.0' 13.0' (TYP) 20.2' (TYP) 18.0' (TYP) PROPOSED 5.0' SIDEWALK 46.6' 40.2' 36.1' 1.1' 13.0'15.5' 14.0' 16.0' 32.3' 56.2' 81.7' 54.3' 24.0' PROPOSED 8.0' SIDEWALK 16.0' 3.6' 3.1' VARIES 2' (MIN) 4.0' DRAINAGE PAN 5.0' 5.0' 8.0' 2.6' 6.0'6.0' 7.5' 7.0' PROPOSED 8.0' ROW DEDICATION (PER PLAT) PROPOSED 1.5' ROW DEDICATION (PER PLAT) PROPOSED SAWCUT (LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT (TYP) PAVEMENT WITHIN ROW SHALL BE PER WHEAT RIDGE STANDARD DETAILS (S-E01 HMA) PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED 18.5' OF FLUSH CURB AT ADA PARKING 4.0' DRAINAGE PAN PROPOSED SIDEWALK CHASE RE: SHEET C6.2 ROADWAY SIGHT TRIANGLE ROADWAY SIGHT TRIANGLE (300' LEG) 55' CORNER SIGHT TRIANGLE PROPOSED ADA RAMP 12:1 (MAX) TYPE 2 - TWO RAMPS PROPOSED BUILDING (RE: ARCH TYP) PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE (RE: ARCH) PROPOSED ADA CURB RAMP 12:1 (MAX) (TYPE 2 - DIRECTIONAL RAMP) PROPOSED ADA CURB RAMP 12:1 (MAX) (TYPE 1 - DIRECTIONAL RAMP) PROPOSED CURB RAMP (TYPE 2 PARALLEL) 12:1 (MAX) PROPOSED CURB RAMP (TYPE 2 PARALLEL) 12:1 (MAX) PROPOSED 4.1' SIDEWALK TO TIE INTO EXISTING SIDEWALK AT PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CURB WALL TO REMAIN SEE MUTCD FIGURE 3B-22 (2009 EDITION) PROPOSED ADA STRIPING, 4" WHITE PAINTED STRIPED AT 34" O.C. PROPOSED 4" WHITE PARKING STALL STRIPE (TYP) PROPOSED SCREEN WALL (RE: ARCH) 15.0' 19.8' EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH PROPOSED ATTACHED SIDEWALK PER WHEAT RIDGE STANDARD DETAILS L41 L42 C19 L44 C21 C2 2 L4 8 C23 C2 4 L5 1 C25 L5 3 4.0' DRAINAGE PAN ROADWAY SIGHT TRIANGLE (300' LEG) ROADWAY SIGHT TRIANGLE (300' LEG) PROPOSED TYPE 1 DRIVE CUT PROPOSED TYPE 2 DRIVE CUT PROPOSED CURB RAMP 12:1 (MAX) (TYPE 1 - DIRECTIONAL RAMP) PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN LIGHT (RE: LIGHTING PLAN) PROPOSED ADA RAMP 12:1 (MAX) TYPE 2 - TWO RAMPS N89° 58' 27"E 114.47'L=23.49,R=15.00 Δ=89°44'08" 8.00' 1.50' PROP. STOP SIGN PROP. DO NOT ENTER SIGN L54L55 L5 6 L57 L5 8 L5 9 L6 0 L6 1 L6 2 L6 3 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 PROPOSED 5.0' SIDEWALK LIP OF GUTTER/EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY PROPOSED ROW EXISTING ROW EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY PROP. DO NOT ENTER SIGN PROP. DO NOT ENTER SIGN 38.0' CL-PROP. ROW PROP. DO NOT ENTER SIGN PROP. CROSS WALK PAINT 26.5' CL-PROP. ROW 87.6 LF OF MODIFIED CURB HEIGHT (12" MAX) N:708,416.06 E:124,041.93 N:708,452.76 E:124,045.29 AREA TO BE MILLED AND OVERLAID AT A DEPTH OF 2-4" (TYP) AREA TO BE MILLED AND OVERLAID AT A DEPTH OF 2-4" (TYP) N:708,423.30 E:124,068.70 N:708,452.83 E:124,058.29 0.5' 0.5' L7 0 L7 1 L72 C32 L7 4 REESTABLISHED ROADWAY CROWN N0 ° 1 6 ' 5 1 " W 15 4 . 6 9 ' S89° 52' 45"W 130.93' S0 ° 1 7 ' 2 5 " E 13 1 . 5 4 ' N:708,290.30 E:124,026.35 LINE TABLE LINE No. L1 L4 L6 L7 L9 L11 L12 L16 L19 L23 L26 L29 L30 L31 L34 L35 L37 L38 L39 L40 LENGTH 0.95' 96.22' 108.18' 21.26' 68.85' 0.93' 36.29' 1.64' 78.52' 7.03' 3.33' 23.00' 17.63' 18.96' 1.30' 4.02' 41.29' 9.00' 19.63' 20.17' DIRECTION S0° 17' 32"E S0° 17' 32"E N89° 42' 28"E N0° 17' 32"W S89° 54' 08"W N0° 17' 32"W S0° 17' 32"E N0° 17' 32"W N0° 17' 32"W N89° 54' 08"E S0° 17' 32"E N0° 17' 32"W N89° 50' 36"E S0° 17' 32"E N0° 17' 32"W S89° 42' 28"W N0° 17' 32"W S89° 42' 28"W S60° 17' 32"E N60° 17' 32"W CURVE TABLE CURVE No. C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 LENGTH 13.98' 13.98' 31.42' 23.51' 6.27' 15.71' 17.73' 1.59' 3.10' 3.82' 2.51' 4.71' 15.71' 4.19' 5.72' 1.58' 8.63' 7.65' 8.53' 8.61' 15.71' 5.24' 5.24' 5.24' 5.24' 5.24' 5.24' 1.88' RADIUS 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' 15.00' 4.00' 10.00' 12.00' 1.00' 2.00' 6.00' 1.00' 3.00' 10.00' 2.00' 5.00' 8.00' 10.00' 15.00' 10.00' 10.00' 10.00' 1.67' 1.67' 1.67' 1.67' 1.67' 1.67' 2.00' DELTA 40°02'45" 40°02'45" 90°00'00" 89°48'20" 89°48'20" 90°00'00" 84°40'09" 91°11'37" 88°48'23" 36°28'13" 143°31'47" 90°00'00" 90°00'00" 120°00'00" 65°31'31" 11°19'04" 49°27'42" 29°13'14" 48°52'27" 49°18'24" 90°00'00" 180°00'00" 180°00'00" 180°00'00" 180°00'00" 180°00'00" 180°00'00" 53°47'50" CHORD DIRECTION S19° 43' 51"W S19° 43' 51"W S45° 17' 32"E N45° 11' 42"W N45° 11' 42"W S44° 42' 28"W N47° 34' 04"E S45° 18' 17"W N44° 41' 43"W S17° 56' 34"W N72° 03' 26"W N45° 17' 32"W N45° 17' 32"W N59° 42' 28"E N27° 31' 46"W S84° 38' 00"E S54° 14' 37"E S14° 54' 09"E S24° 08' 41"W S23° 55' 43"W S45° 05' 52"E S89° 50' 36"W N89° 50' 36"E N89° 50' 36"E S89° 50' 36"W S89° 50' 36"W N89° 50' 36"E N27° 11' 27"W CHORD LENGTH 13.70' 13.70' 28.28' 21.18' 5.65' 14.14' 16.16' 1.43' 2.80' 3.75' 1.90' 4.24' 14.14' 3.46' 5.41' 1.58' 8.37' 7.57' 8.27' 8.34' 14.14' 3.33' 3.33' 3.33' 3.33' 3.33' 3.33' 1.81' LINE TABLE LINE No. L41 L42 L44 L48 L51 L53 L54 L55 L56 L57 L58 L59 L60 L61 L62 L63 L70 L71 L72 L74 LENGTH 58.72' 1.83' 13.24' 13.00' 125.69' 10.47' 74.67' 20.00' 81.98' 17.50' 3.67' 3.67' 3.67' 3.67' 3.67' 3.67' 15.57' 21.53' 11.70' 21.05' DIRECTION S89° 50' 48"E N89° 42' 28"E S78° 58' 28"E S0° 17' 32"E S0° 19' 44"E S0° 05' 52"E S89° 50' 36"W S89° 42' 28"W S0° 17' 32"E S89° 42' 28"W N0° 09' 24"W S0° 09' 24"E N0° 09' 24"W S0° 09' 24"E N0° 09' 24"W S0° 09' 24"E N12° 53' 32"E N0° 17' 32"W N54° 05' 22"W N0° 17' 32"W HO R I Z O N T A L C O N T R O L , S I G N A G E & ST R I P I N G P L A N PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C3.0 LL G AC L LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED SPILL CURB EXISTING CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED WALK PROPOSED LIGHT POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE PROPOSED SIGN EXISTING SIGN EXISTING TREE NOTES: BUILDING HC NOTE: HORIZONTAL CONTROL INFORMATION SHOWN FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS BASED ON THE OUTER MOST LIMIT OF THE ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PLAN PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF DESIGN/APPROVAL OF HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN. CONTRACTOR AND SURVEYOR SHALL VERIFY BUILDING CONTROL WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL BUILDING LAYOUT INFORMATION PRIOR TO THE STAKING AND CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND INFORMATION SHOWN ON PLANS. SAWCUT NOTE: SAWCUT LIMITS ARE SHOWN AS APPROXIMATES, ALL CONCRETE REMOVAL SHALL BE FULL PANEL/STONE REMOVAL, IE REMOVAL SHALL BE TO NEAREST JOINT. 1.PAVEMENT THICKNESSES ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY ON SHEET C6.2. REFER TO CURRENT GEOTECHNICAL STUDY FOR THIS PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESS RECOMMENDATIONS. 2.THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONTROL COLOR OR SCORING PATTERNS OF HARDSCAPE SHOWN. SEE HARDSCAPE OR LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DECORATIVE TREATMENT. 3.ALL DIMENSIONS TO CURBS ARE TO FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 4.CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS. 0 SCALE: 1" = 5 10 20 10' NSIGN LEGEND: ACCESSIBLE PARKING STRIPING PER MUTCD FIG. 3B.22 ONE PER SPACE N.T.S. TYPICAL SIGN DETAIL ONE PER SPACE N.T.S. RESERVEDPARKING ACCESSIBLE VAN ADA RESERVED PARKING (MUTCD #R7-8) ATOP VAN ACCESSIBLE (MUTCD #R7-8A) NOTES: ·ALL SIGNS SHALL BE TO MUTCD STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. MIN. 3" STROKE WIDTH BLUE BACKGROUND AND WHITE BORDER ARE OPTIONAL 28" MIN. 24" MIN. RESERVED PARKING VAN ACCESSIBLE 2" GALVANIZED SQUARE SIGN POST, OR APPROVED EQUAL MUTCD R7-8A 9"X18" WHERE INDICATED ON PLAN FOR VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES ONLY MUTCD R7-8 12"X18" 7' MIN. STOP DO NOT ENTER 24"X24" DO NOT ENTER SIGN (MUTCD #R5-1) 30"X30" STOP SIGN (MUTCD #R1-1) 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 7 of 81 SS ST M COCO CO COCO TRANS PROPOSED 5.0' SIDEWALK VARIES 2' (MIN) 4.0' DRAINAGE PAN (TYP) PROPOSED 8.0' ROW DEDICATION (PER PLAT) PROPOSED LAKESIDE AUTOWASH (FFE:5376.56) 4.0' DRAINAGE PAN FL:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FL:5376.56 FL:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FG:5376.56 FL:5376.56 FL:5375.95 FL:5376.25 FL:5376.43 FL:5377.11 FL:5377.46 FL:5377.51 FL:5377.41 FL:5377.28 FL:5377.13 FL:5378.02 FL:5378.44 FL:5378.54 FL:5378.02 FL:5377.83 FL:5377.54 FL/HP:5377.38 FL:5376.72 FL:5376.78 FL/HP:5376.96 FL:5376.54 FL:5376.38 FL:5376.55 FL:5377.26 FL:5375.76 FL:5375.34 FL:5375.47 FL:5375.58 FL:5375.69 FL:5376.45 FG:5376.13 FG:5376.17 FG:5376.27 FG:5376.18 FL:5375.88 FG:5375.98 FL:5375.88 FG:5376.47 FL:5374.85 FL:5374.75 FL:5374.20 FG:5374.44 FL:5374.76 FL:5374.77 FG:5374.48 FG:5374.46 FG:5374.32 FL:5373.66FL:5373.55 5374.08 (ME) FG:5374.21 FG:5374.09 FG:5374.26 FL:5374.51 FG:5375.08 FG:5375.00 FL:5373.74 (ME) FL:5375.35 FL:5374.72 FL:5375.17 FL:5377.82 FG:5378.41 FL:5379.19 FG:5379.28 0.64%0.64% 0.6 4 % 3. 0 4 % 3. 8 7 % 5. 0 8 % 4. 1 3 % 3. 9 8 % 4. 0 0 % 4. 0 0 % 4. 1 3 % 3.9 8 % 0.86% 0.97% 3. 2 6 % 0.97%0.97%0.40% 2. 2 7 % 4.5 0 % 0.64% 3.82% 3.26% 1.82% 0.64% 0.79% 1.42% 1.01% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 2. 4 0 % 4: 1 1.8 0 % 1. 8 0 % 0.36% 0.16%1.8 0 % 1. 8 0 % 8. 3 3 % 1. 0 0 % 0.50% 1.80% 1.80% 5. 2 2 % 3. 7 1 % 7.8 0 % FL:5375.41 FG:5374.53 FG:5375.04 5373.67 (ME) 5373.65 (ME) FL:5373.72 (ME) FL:5373.51 (ME) 5378.82 (ME) FL:5377.11 FG:5377.70 FG:5377.42 FG:5376.62 FL:5376.03 FL:5376.83 4.7 0 % FL:5375.23 4.1 2 % 7.80%1.98 % 7. 6 7 % 0. 0 4 % 7. 8 0 % FG:5375.86 FG:5376.48 FL:5375.89 FG:5377.79 FG:5376.81 6:1 7.6 % 10 . 0 % FG:5374.08 FG:5374.30 FG:5374.53 FG:5374.38 TOC:5374.21 (ME) FG:5374.38 FG:5374.52 FG:5374.36 FG:5374.49 2. 7 4 % 4:1 4:1 4:1 4:1 4:1 FL:5377.49 FL:5377.77 FL:5378.22 FL:5377.94 6:1 4: 1 4:1 4: 1 7: 1 11.8 9 % 4:1 3. 3 4 % 4. 5 5 % 0. 6 4 % FL:5375.46 1. 9 9 % 4.00% 5.3 5 % FG:5376.54 FG:5376.52 FIRST 5.0' TO BE GRADED AT 2% (MAX) 5375 53 7 6 53 7 7 53 7 8 537 9 5380 5378 5379 5380 5375 5374 5374 5376 5377 5378 5379 537 6 5377 5377 5375 5374 5376 5376 537 6 537 7 53 7 8 5378 FG:5374.18 FL:5373.64 FG:5374.09 FL:5374.29 FL:5374.58 FG:5374.60 FG:5376.54 FG:5376.54 FL:5376.25 FL:5375.77 FL:5375.42 FG:5376.34 FG:5376.27 FG:5376.14 FG:5376.18 FG:5376.49 FL:5375.90 FG:5377.55 FL:5377.00 FL:5377.41 FL:5376.14 FL:5376.33 FL:5376.22 FG:5377.51 FG:5377.61 4. 0 0 % 4.00% 0.64% 2.57 % 0.90 % 0. 2 0 % 4. 0 0 % 2.07% 4. 7 0 % FL:5375.51 FL:5374.92 FL:5375.11 FL:5375.30 FL:5375.47 FL:5376.03 FG:5376.45 FL:5376.43 FG:5376.45 FG:5376.52 4. 2 3 % 5. 1 3 % 1.8 1 % 1.8 0 % 2. 3 1 % 5. 0 5 % 1. 8 0 % 4. 9 1 % 6. 1 5 % 6:1 6:1 5.70% 4.83% 4.8 0 % 1.25% 1.28%1.17%3.27% FL:5374.53 0.37% 0.13% 4.7 0 % 8. 1 8 % 1. 8 0 % 4.7 0 % 4.50%1.80% 0.11%4.50% 1. 0 1 % 0.9 9 % TOC:5378.49 1.00%1.80% 1.80% FL:5375.53 0. 6 4 % FL:5375.942.01% FG:5374.33 FG:5375.94 FL:5374.38 FL:5374.87 FL:5375.10 FL:5374.58 FG:5379.41 2.46% 26.0' GR A Y S T R E E T EX . 5 0 ' R . O . W . / P R O P O S E D 5 1 . 5 ' R . O . W . WEST 44TH AVENUE EX. 70' R.O.W. / PROPOSED 78' R.O.W. 0. 6 4 % PROPOSED 8.0' SIDEWALK PROPOSED SAWCUT (LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT) (TYP) PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED SIDEWALK CHASE RE: SHEET C6.2 PROPOSED BUILDING (RE: ARCH TYP) PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE (RE: ARCH) EXISTING CURB WALL TO REMAIN PROPOSED SCREEN WALL (RE: ARCH) EXISTING INLET TO REMAIN EXISTING INLET TO REMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY CLEANOUT (SEE C5.0 FOR DETAILS)GRADE BREAK (TYP) PROPOSED 18.5' OF FLUSH CURB AT ADA PARKING PROPOSED 1.5' ROW DEDICATION (PER PLAT) STREET SECTIONS RE: SHEET C4.2 STREET SECTIONS RE: SHEET C4.2 PROPOSED CURB RAMP (TYPE 2 PARALLEL) 12:1 (MAX) PROPOSED CURB RAMP (TYPE 2 PARALLEL) 12:1 (MAX) FL:5374.99 5375.76 (ME) FG:5374.99 FG:5375.08 FG:5375.16 FG:5375.07 FL:5374.58 FL:5374.72 5374.40 (ME) 7.80%1.80% 1.80%6.58% 1.0 0 % PROPOSED CURB RAMP 12:1 (MAX) TYPE 1 - DIRECTIONAL RAMP (TYP) 1. 8 0 % CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CROSS SLOPE. IF EXISTING SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 2% CONTRACTOR TO WORK WITH INSPECTOR TO DETERMINE LIMITS OF EXISTING SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT. 7.27%8.01% 3. 9 % TOC:5374.25 (ME) 1.7 2 % EOP:5374.83 EOP:5374.68 GUTTER AT CURB RAMPS SHALL HAVE A MAX CROSS SLOPE OF 5% (TYP) END MODIFIED CURB N:708,411.77 E:123,891.92 FG:5377.36 FG:5377.21 FLOWLINE FORMED IN CONCRETE (CONCRETE SWALE) 87.6 LF OF MODIFIED CURB HEIGHT (12" MAX) 5375.14 (ME) 5374.57 (ME) 5374.46 (ME) 5374.06 (ME) 5374.50 (ME) 5376.19 (ME) 5375.67 (ME) 5379.08 (ME) 5375.63 (ME) 5375.25 (ME) 5374.71 (ME) 5374.92 (ME) EOP:5374.68 EOP:5374.82 FL/HP5373.81 (EXISTING) (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY) 2. 6 3 % 1+00 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 0+ 5 0 . 0 0 0+ 7 5 . 0 0 1+ 0 0 . 0 0 1+ 2 5 . 0 0 1+ 5 0 . 0 0 1+ 7 5 . 0 0 2+00.00 2+25.00 2+50.00 2+75.00 3+00.00 3+25.00 3+50.00 3+60.42 FG:5375.26 FG:5375.12 5374.51 (ME) FG:5375.49 AREA TO BE MILLED AND OVERLAID AT A DEPTH OF 2-4" (TYP) REESTABLISHED ROADWAY CROWN AREA TO BE MILLED AND OVERLAID AT A DEPTH OF 2-4" (TYP) 7. 8 0 % FG:5377.35 FG:5377.24 FG:5377.30 FG:5377.78 FG:5377.14 FG:5376.61 FG:5376.63 1.1' 1.2' 3.1' 3.2' 0.0' START MODIFIED CURB N:708,304.62 E:123,985.11 FG:5376.53 3. 8 0 % 1.80% 1.80% PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C4.0 OV E R A L L G R A D I N G P L A N LL G AC L LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED CATCH CURB PROPOSED SPILL CURB PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED STORM LINE W/ F.E.S. EXISTING STORM LINE W/ F.E.S. PROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED STORM INLET EXISTING STORM INLET FLOW DIRECTION PROPOSED SPOT GRADE EXISTING SPOT GRADE SLOPE AND DIRECTION HIGH POINT LOW POINT GRADE BREAK FINISHED GRADE AT TOP OF WALL FINISHED GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL 1.SPOT ELEVATION VALUES ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) AND DO NOT RELATE TO ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS RELATIVE TO FINISHED FLOOR (I.E. +100'-0"). 2.UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN OTHERWISE, ALL SIDEWALKS TO SLOPE 1.8% AWAY FROM BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES TOWARD PARKING LOTS, DRIVE LANES, ROADS OR LOW POINTS. 3.UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN OTHERWISE, ALL PROPOSED WALKS AND TRAILS SHALL BE ADA ACCESSIBLE WITH A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5.0%. 4.ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CURRENT GEOTECHNICAL STUDY FOR THIS PROJECT. 5.PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOTS SHALL HAVE 2.0% MAX SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. 6.ALL ELEVATION SPOTS ALONG CURB INDICATE FLOWLINE ELEVATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.MAXIMUM FINISHED GRADES SHALL BE 4:1 (H:V). 8.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ONSITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND PROTECT OR RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A UTILITY LOCATE. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH THESE PLANS. 10.NO CONCRETE JOINTS WITHIN CENTER OF PROPOSED CONCRETE SWALES OR DRAINAGE PANS. NOTES: 25.25 25.25 2.00% HP LP GB 5400 5401 5401 GTW GBW 5400 0 SCALE: 1" = 5 10 20 10' N 0.5' PROPOSED CONCRETE PAN 4' CONCRETE DRAINAGE PAN PRIVATE - N.T.S. 1" 4' 2' 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 8 of 81 5370 5375 5380 5385 0+00 1+00 0.37% GEING PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER AT GRADE BREAK STA = 0+55.00 ELEV = 5373.505 END PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER AT GRADE BREAK STA = 1+13.72 ELEV = 5373.720 EXISTING HP:5373.81 PROPOSED 24.0' DRIVE CUT EXISTING GRADE FINISHED GRADE 5370 5375 5380 5385 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+10 2.98% 2.65% 2.81% 1.80% -4.89%0.64% 3.93% GRADE BREAK STA = 1+75.10 ELEV = 5373.754 GRADE BREAK STA = 1+77.64 ELEV = 5373.630 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 1 + 8 3 . 9 3 EL E V = 5 3 7 3 . 6 7 0 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 2 + 0 7 . 1 2 EL E V = 5 3 7 4 . 5 8 1 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 2 + 1 5 . 1 2 EL E V = 5 3 7 4 . 7 2 5 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 2 + 3 7 . 1 9 EL E V = 5 3 7 5 . 3 4 4 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 2 + 8 2 . 5 0 EL E V = 5 3 7 6 . 6 9 3 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 3 + 6 0 . 4 2 EL E V = 5 3 7 8 . 7 5 7 PC : 1 + 7 6 . 0 2 PT : 1 + 7 7 . 6 0 PC : 1 + 9 0 . 8 4 PC C : 1 + 9 9 . 4 7 PT : 2 + 0 7 . 1 2 PC : 2 + 2 0 . 1 2 PR C : 2 + 2 8 . 6 5 PT : 2 + 3 7 . 1 9 PROPOSED 8.0' CURB RAMP PROPOSED 16.0' DRIVE CUT FINISHED ELEVATION (TYP)EXISTING ELEVATION (TYP) PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C4.1 ST R E E T F L P R O F I L E LL G AC L 0 SCALE: 1" = 5 10 20 10' MA T C H L I N E - T H I S S H E E T S T A : 1 + 7 0 . 0 0 STREET FLOWLINE PROFILE H: 1" = 10' V: 1' = 2' MA T C H L I N E - T H I S S H E E T S T A : 1 + 7 0 . 0 0 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 9 of 81 6.5' APPROACH @ DRIVE CUT 6.0' SW @ DRIVE CUT EXISTING GRADE (TYP.)8.0' SW EXISTING R.O.W. (TYP.)FINISHED GRADE (TYP.) 0+50.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 0+75.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 1+00.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 1+25.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 1+50.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 1+75.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 2+50.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 2+75.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 3+00.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 3+25.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 3+50.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 3+60.42 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 8.0' SW 8.0' SW 8.0' SW 5.0' SW 5.0' SW 5.0' SW 5.0' SW 5.0' SW 5.0' SW 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1'2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 4.0' SW (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY CROSS SLOPE MEETS 2% CROSS SLOPE. IF CROSS DOES NOT CONFIRM CONTRACTOR TO WORK WITH ROW INSPECTOR TO DETERMINE REMOVE AND REPLACEMENT) SECTION 0+50.00 REPRESENTS THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE SIDEWALK TIE OUT ALONG WEST 44TH AVE. 4.6%1.8% SC O F F : - 4 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 3 . 9 7 SC O F F : - 3 . 9 0 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 0 2 SC O F F : - 3 . 8 6 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 0 7 SC O F F : - 5 . 8 0 EL : 5 3 7 6 . 0 4 SC O F F : - 6 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 6 . 7 8 SC O F F : - 6 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 7 . 4 5 SC O F F : - 6 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 8 . 1 0 SC O F F : - 6 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 8 . 7 5 SC O F F : - 6 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 9 . 0 1 FL O F F : 0 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 8 . 7 6 FL O F F : - 6 5 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 8 . 4 8 FL O F F : - 1 3 0 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 7 . 8 2 FL O F F : 0 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 7 . 1 6 FL O F F : 0 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 6 . 4 7 FL O F F : 0 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 5 . 7 3 FL O F F : 0 . 1 2 EL : 5 3 7 3 . 7 4 FL O F F : 0 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 3 . 5 8 FL O F F : 0 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 3 . 6 7 TO C O F F : 0 . 6 5 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 1 4 TOC OFF:0.72 EL:5374.28 SW O F F : 6 . 5 0 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 1 2 SW O F F : 1 2 . 5 0 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 2 3 SW O F F : 3 . 1 0 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 3 0 SW O F F : 1 1 . 1 0 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 4 5 SW O F F : 2 . 9 4 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 3 6 SW O F F : 1 0 . 9 4 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 5 0 SW OFF:2.73 EL:5374.37 SW OFF:10.73 EL:5374.52 SW O F F : 2 . 7 3 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 4 1 SW O F F : 1 0 . 6 4 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 5 5 SW O F F : 5 . 5 0 EL : 5 3 7 6 . 3 2 SW O F F : 5 . 5 0 EL : 5 3 7 7 . 0 6 SW O F F : 5 . 5 0 EL : 5 3 7 7 . 7 5 SW O F F : 5 . 5 0 EL : 5 3 7 8 . 4 0 SW O F F : 5 . 5 0 EL : 5 3 7 8 . 6 6 SW O F F : 5 . 5 0 EL : 5 3 7 9 . 3 5 7.5%4.6%1.8%5.2%4.8%1.7%7.2%5.8%1.8%4.9% 7.4%1.8%9.1% 4.6%1.8%4.3%1.8% 3.6%1.8%3.7%1.8%2.2%1.8%4.5%1.8% SECTION 0+75.00 IS TAKEN AT THE WEST 44TH AVE. DRIVE CUT LOCATION. SECTION3+60.420 IS TAKEN AT THE SIDEWALK TIE OUT LOCATION AND LANDING OF ADA RAMP ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOUTH END OF THE DRIVE CUT LOCATED ALONG GRAY STREET. SECTION 3+25.00 IS TAKEN AT THE SOUTH END OF THE THE ADA RAMP/DRIVE CUT LOCATED ALONG GRAY STREET. ROW OFF:13.35 EL:5374.27 ROW OFF:13.35 EL:5374.55 ROW OFF:13.35 EL:5374.86 ROW OFF:7.96 EL:5377.36 ROW OFF:8.06 EL:5376.73ROW OFF:14.13 EL:5375.28 ROW OFF:13.35 EL:5375.16 ROW OFF:7.98 EL:5377.90 ROW OFF:7.99 EL:5378.46 RO W O F F : 8 . 0 1 EL : 5 3 7 9 . 0 5 ROW OFF:6.51 EL:5379.41 SECTION 3+25.00 IS TAKEN AT THE NORTH END OF THE THE ADA RAMP/DRIVE CUT LOCATED ALONG GRAY STREET. MATCH EXISTING TOC MATCH EXISTING TOC 2+00.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 2+25.00 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 0 100-10 8.2' SW 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' 1.6%1.6% 0.2%2.8% FL O F F : 0 . 0 4 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 3 0 SW O F F : 6 . 7 5 EL : 5 3 7 4 . 9 0 SW O F F : 1 5 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 5 . 0 4 FL O F F : 0 . 0 8 EL : 5 3 7 5 . 0 0 SW O F F : 1 2 . 6 7 EL : 5 3 7 5 . 3 1 SW O F F : 7 . 0 0 EL : 5 3 7 5 . 3 2 5.7' SW 2.0' GUTTER @ 1"/1' SECTION 2+25.00 IS TAKEN AT THE SOUTH OF PROPOSED CURB RAMP AND IS WITHIN A SIDEWALK TRANSITION TO THE LANDING OF THE RAMP. FLOW WILL BE DIRECTED IN A NORTHERN DIRECTION TOWARDS THE INTERSECTION OF GRAY AND 44TH. SECTION LINE IS TAKEN PERPENDICULAR TO CURB. SECTION 2+00.00 IS TAKEN AT THE NORTH OF PROPOSED CURB RAMP AND IS WITHIN A SIDEWALK TRANSITION TO THE LANDING OF THE RAMP. FLOW WILL BE DIRECTED IN A NORTHERN DIRECTION TOWARDS THE INTERSECTION OF GRAY AND 44TH. SECTION LINE IS TAKEN PERPENDICULAR TO CURB. PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C4.2 ST R E E T S E C T I O N S LL G AC L 0 SCALE: 1" = 5 10 20 10' SIDEWALK SAWCUT PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY TOP BACK OF CURB SW SC R.O.W. SECTION LEGEND TOC HORZ. SCALE: 1" = 10' VERT. SCALE: 1" = 10' 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 10 of 81 SS ST M COCO CO COCO TRANS PROPOSED 8.0' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 5.0' SIDEWALK VARIES 2' (MIN) 4.0' DRAINAGE PAN PROPOSED 6.0' ROW DEDICATION (RECEPTION NO. _____________) PROPOSED 1.5' ROW DEDICATION (RECEPTION NO. _____________) PROPOSED SAWCUT (LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT (TYP) PROPERTY BOUNDARY GR A Y S T R E E T WEST 44TH AVENUE PROPOSED LAKESIDE AUTOWASH (FFE:5376.56) 4.0' DRAINAGE PAN PROPOSED 18" SIDEWALK CHASE PROPOSED BUILDING (RE: ARCH TYP) PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE (RE: ARCH) PROPOSED ADA RAMP 12:1 (MAX) PROPOSED ADA RAMP 12:1 (MAX) PROPOSED ADA RAMP 12:1 (MAX) EXISTING CURB WALL TO REMAIN PROPOSED SCREEN WALL (RE: ARCH) EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE RIM:5374.75 INV IN:5366.95 8" VCP (S) INV IN:5366.5 10" VCP (E) INV OUT:5366.45 10" VCP (W) PROPOSED 1" CORP STOP & 1" TAP BY DENVER WATER N:708,344.50 E:124,051.28 PROPOSED 1" METER IN METER PIT N:708,344.32 E:124,016.02 PROPOSED 1" CURB STOP N:708,344.37 E:124,025.54 CONNECT TO INTERNAL 1" WATER LINE (RE: PLUMBING PLANS) N:708,355.57 E:123,982.42 35.3 LF ~ 1" TYPE K COPPER PROPOSED UTILITY CROSSING N:708,344.43 E:124,038.13 (CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A MIN OF 18" CLEARANCE BETWEEN UTILITIES) CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" MAIN W/ 8"x4" WYE N:708,432.19 E:124,038.04 INV:5368.36 (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY) 35.1 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) 20.0 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) 6.0 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) PROPOSED 4" WYE & CLEANOUT RIM:5376.03 INV:5371.75 PROPOSED 4" WYE INV:5370.71 PROPOSED 4" WYE WITH CLEANOUT RIM:5376.83 INV:5371.03 CONNECT TO PROPOSED SOI INV:5369.71 PROPOSED SOI (RE: PLUMBING) CONNECT TO INTERNAL PLUMBING INV:5372.15 (RE: ARCH & PLUMBING) CONNECT TO PROPOSED SOI INV:5369.71 PROPOSED 4" WYE INV:5370.06 PROPOSED 4" TEE INV:5369.74 16.0 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) 32.7 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) 16.0 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) 1.5 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) 8.8 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) 8.8 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) 6.0 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) PROPOSED UTILITY CROSSING N:708,413.85 E:123,973.01 TOP:5370.50 (SAN EAST-WEST) BOP:5372.11 (SAN NORTH-SOUTH) (CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A MIN OF 18" CLEARANCE BETWEEN UTILITIES) CONNECT TO INTERNAL PLUMBING INV:5371.15 (RE: ARCH & PLUMBING) CONNECT TO INTERNAL PLUMBING INV:5371.15 (RE: ARCH & PLUMBING) CONNECT TO INTERNAL PLUMBING INV:5371.15 (RE: ARCH & PLUMBING) CONNECT TO INTERNAL PLUMBING INV:5371.15 (RE: ARCH & PLUMBING) 4.5 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) EXISTING SANITARY MAIN TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING GAS LINE TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING WATER MAIN TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING STORM MAIN TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING INLET TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING STORM MANHOLE TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN (TYP) EXISTING WATER VALVE TO REMAIN (TYP) PROPOSED UTILITY CROSSING N:708,344.44 E:124,040.59 (CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A MIN OF 18" CLEARANCE BETWEEN UTILITIES) 42.82 LF ~ 1" TYPE K COPPER PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN LIGHT (RE: LIGHTING PLAN TYP) 29.1 LF ~ 4" PVC @ 2% (MIN) (PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE) EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED BELOW GROUND (CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDED) 4' Ø MANHOLE (SAMPLING MANHOLE PER CDOT DETAIL M-604-20) N:708,432.03 E:124,007.98 RIM:5375.90 INV IN:5369.62 (S/W) INV OUT:5369.42 (E) EXISTING 1' TAP (TAP # X29686) TO BE ABANDONED PER DWD ENG. STD 3.18 EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED/REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO ALLOW FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 13.3' PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 DW D C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 6/ 1 7 / 2 0 2 4 54321 C5.0 OV E R A L L U T I L I T Y P L A N LL G AC L LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED STORM LINE W/ F.E.S. EXISTING STORM LINE W/ F.E.S. PROPOSED INLET EXISTING INLET PROPOSED WATER LINE EXISTING WATER LINE PROPOSED HYDRANT & VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT & VALVE PROPOSED SAN SEWER LINE EXISTING SAN SEWER LINE PROPOSED SAN CLEANOUT EXISTING ELECTRICAL LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE EXISTING TELECOMM LINE EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING IRRIGATION LINE EXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINE PROPOSED LIGHT POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE 1.CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS. 2.ALL PIPE LENGTHS AND STATIONS ARE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE, ACTUAL FIELD LENGTHS MAY VARY. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PROPER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (303.205.7615) REGARDING THE PLACEMENT OF THE ELECTRIC METER REQUIRED FOR THE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING WITHIN THE ROW. 5.NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK). NOTES: 4 SS CO 0 SCALE: 1" = 5 10 20 10' N TOTAL FIRE FLOW REQUIRED FOR THIS SITE IS ___1,500_______GPM MINIMUM @ 20 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE. THIS FLOW MUST BE PROVIDED FROM A MINIMUM OF ___1______ FIRE HYDRANTS. EACH FIRE HYDRANT MUST SUPPLY 1,500 GPM MINIMUM @ 20 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT THE HYDRANT OUTLET TO BE ACCEPTED. CODE USED FOR ANALYSIS: 2018 IFC WITH 2019 AMENDMENTS OCCUPANCY GROUP(S): B CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB FIRE FLOW CALCULATION AREA: 3,539 THIS BUILDING IS NOT FULLY PROTECTED WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM. FDC LOCATION & ORIENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE PLACED IN THE FIELD BY DFD FIRE INSPECTORS PER SECTION IFCA 912.2 6/17/2024 Exhibit R - Page 11 of 81 PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C6.0 DE T A I L S LL G AC L 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 12 of 81 PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C6.1 DE T A I L S LL G AC L 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 13 of 81 PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C6.2 DE T A I L S LL G AC L NATURAL SUBGRADE TO BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED (24" MIN) PER GEOTECH RECOMMENDATIONS PRIVATE PORTLAND CEMENT (PCCP) PAVEMENT SECTION - HEAVY DUTY N.T.S. PROPOSED 7" MINIMUM CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RE: GEOTECH REPORT) (CONCRETE SHALL MET CDOT CLASS D OR P REQUIREMENTS PER GEOTECH REPORT) AT GRAY STREET AT 44TH AVENUE 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 14 of 81 PR O J . N O . : DA T E : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : SEAL: DRAWING NO. R E V I S I O N S DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . 60 0 G r a n t S t r e e t | S u i t e 2 1 0 | D e n v e r , C O FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PROOF CIVIL CO. WH E A T R I D G E AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CO L O R A D O 22 0 6 4 2/ 3 / 2 0 2 3 RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S RE S P O N S E T O C O M M E N T S 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 4/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 4321 C6.3 DE T A I L S LL G AC L 4/30/2024 Exhibit R - Page 15 of 81 ST COCO CO COCO TRANS W. 44TH AVE. N G R A Y S T 1 QUCR 3 COCB 1 PIPB 3 MIST 3 PHNA 3 PIMS 3 PHNA 3 MIST 4 BETH 5 RHFR 4 BETH 1 PIPB 3 PIMS 5 CAKF 1 ACAG 1 JUBU 7 CAKF 1 JUBU 1 ACAG 1 JUBU 3 COCB 3 SPFT 1 PIPB 1 GLSK 3 COCB 3 MIGR 1 QUCR 1 QUCR3 RIAL3 PIMS 3 PIMS LEGEN SMBOL ESCRIPTION ROCK MULCH ECIUOUS TREE EISTING TREE TO BE REMOE ECIUOUS SHRUBS EERGREEN SHRUBS ORNAMENTAL GRASS CONCRETE PAING BROALEAF EERGREEN SHRUBS EERGREEN TREE PAERS SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 CM CM 33 INERNESS PK STE 175 ENGLEOO CO 11 7 773 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 55 S LOELL BL UNIT3 LITTLETON CO 13 33337 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5 N 1 SCALE 11 LANSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN 3 Exhibit R - Page 16 of 81 STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF GROSS LOT AREA AREA REQUIRE AREA PROIE 34 SF 33 SF SITE ATA LOT AREA 13 SF 44 ACRES STREET CALCULATION QT REQUIRE QT PROIE 44TH AENUE AMENIT ONE LESS THAN FIE FEET NA NA GRA STREET ATTACHE SIEALK NO AMENIT ONE NA NA STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT STREET CALCULATION LENGTH QT REQUIRE QT PROIE 44TH AENUE 1 TREE 3 LF 3 FT 1 4 GRA STREET 1 TREE 3 LF 11 FT 1 4 3 NOTES 1 AUTOMATIC UNERGROUN IRRIGATION SSTEM ILL BE PROIE FOR ALL ONSITE PLANTINGS LANSCAPE AREA PLANTING REQUIREMENT ESCRIPTION CALCULATION AREA QT REQUIRE QT PROIE SITE AREA 1 TREE 1 SF 34 SF 4 4 1 SHRUBS 1 SF 34 SF 3 7 ECIUOUS TREES QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIE ACAG ACER RUBRUM JFSK7 ARMSTRONG GOL MAPLE B B CAL GLSK 1 GLEITSIA INERMIS SKLINE SKLINE HONELOCUST B B CAL QUCR 3 QUERCUS CRIMSCHMIT CRIMSON SPIRE OAK B B CAL EERGREEN TREES QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIE PIPB 3 PICEA PUNGENS BAKERI BAKERI SPRUCE B B BROALEAF EERGREENS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT COCB COTONEASTER AMMERI CORAL BEAUT CORAL BEAUT COTONEASTER 5 GAL ECIUOUS SHRUBS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT BETH BERBERIS THUNBERGII ATROPURPUREA RE BARBERR 5 GAL PHNA PHSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS NANUS ARF NINEBARK 5 GAL RHFR 5 RHAMNUS FRANGULA COLUMNARIS COLUMNAR BUCKTHORN 5 GAL RIAL 3 RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT 5 GAL SPFT 3 SPIRAEA FRITSCHIANA FRITCH SPIREA 5 GAL EERGREEN SHRUBS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT JUBU 3 JUNIPERUS SABINA BUFFALO BUFFALO JUNIPER 5 GAL PIMS 1 PINUS MUGO SLOMOUN SLOMOUN MUGO PINE 5 GAL ORNAMENTAL GRASS QT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAKF 1 CALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFLORA KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REE GRASS 5 GAL MIGR 3 MISCANTHUS SINENSIS GRACILLIMUS MAIEN GRASS 5 GAL MIST MISCANTHUS SINENSIS STRICTUS EBRA GRASS 5 GAL PLANT SCHEULE SIE NOTES 1 ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET OR ECEE CURRENT AMERICAN STANAR FOR NURSER STOCK ANSI 1 AN THE COLORAO NURSER ACT AN ACCOMPANING RULES AN REGULATIONS NOTES 1 IMENSION ECLUES ENTR RIE ITH SHRUB QUANTIT OERAGES HAE BEEN PROIE TO MAKE UP FOR EFICIENCIES IN THE TREE REQUIREMENTS THE OERAGES PROIE INCLUE SHRUBS AN ORNAMENTAL GRASSES CALCULATE AS 1 SHRUBSORNAMENTAL GRASSES ARE EQUAL TO ONE TREE AN AITIONAL 3 SHRUBS HAE BEEN PROIE TO MEET THE TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENT SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 CM CM 33 INERNESS PK STE 175 ENGLEOO CO 11 7 773 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 55 S LOELL BL UNIT3 LITTLETON CO 13 33337 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE NOTES AND DETAILS 4 METAL T POST STAKES ITH PROTECTIE CAP RIE MIN 4 FIRML INTO SUBGRAE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING 1 GAUGE GAL GU IRES AT 3 ABOE GRAE 1 IA 1 PC PIPE ON EACH IRE PLANT SO THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS ABOE FINISHE GRAE PLACE FERTILIER PER SPECS PRIOR TO MULCH APPLICATION APPL CEAR MULCH ITH A 3 IA MULCH RING HEN LOCATE IN GRASS OR SEE AREAS KEEP MULCH FROM CONTACTING TRUNK OF TREE MULCH AS SPECIFIE FORM SAUCER 3 CONT RIM CUT AN REMOE ALL TINE RAPPING AN BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF BALL ATER AN TAMP POCKETS TO REMOE AIR 3 TAMPE TOPSOIL SCARIF EISTING SOIL TO 4 EPTH ECIUOUS TREE 1 1 BALL IA CUT AN REMOE ALL TINEIRE BASKET FROM ROOTBALL 3 NOTES 1 O NOT CUT LEAER PRUNE ALL AMAGE OR EA OO AFTER PLANTING STAKING MULCHING KEEP CRON SHAPE TPICAL OF SPECIES 3 REMOE ALL PLANTING LABELS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE B LANSCAPE ARCHITECT 4 REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL ESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION PROCEURES TO BE FOLLOE 331 EERGREEN TREE PLANTING 3 1 NOTES 1 O NOT CUT LEAER PRUNE ALL AMAGE OR EA OO AFTER PLANTING STAKING AN MULCHING KEEP CRON SHAPE TPICAL OF SPECIES 3 REMOE ALL PLANTING LABELS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE B LANSCAPE ARCHITECT 4 REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL ESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION PROCEURES TO BE FOLLOE 3 1 GAUGE GAL OUBLE STRAN TISTE GU IRES AT 3 ABOE GRAE ITH 1 IA HITE PC PIPE 3 LENGTH ON EACH IRE PLANT TREE 3 ABOE NURSER GRAE SET TRUNK PLUMB APPL MULCH ITH A 3 IA MULCH RING TP KEEP MULCH FROM CONTACTING TRUNK OF TREE INSTALL A 3 HT ATER RING AT TIME OF PLANTING METAL STAKES 3 PER TREE ALIGNE EQUALL AROUN TREE BUR ANCHOR 1 UNERGROUN USE UCK BILL EARTH ANCHOR OR APPROE EQUAL BACKFILL PLANT PIT ITH AMENE SOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS ATTACH GU IRE TO CANAS STRAP OR APPROE EQUI THROUGH GROMMETS UNISTURBE SOIL BALL IA FULL REMOE ALL TINEIRE BASKET FROM ROOTBALL CUT AN REMOE ALL TINE RAPPING AN BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF BALL N PLAN 3 333 SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASS PLANTING 1 1 1 PLANT SO THAT TOP OF ROOTBALL IS LEEL FINISH GRAE PLACE SPECIFIE FERTILIER PRIOR TO MULCH APPLICATION FEATHER MULCH TO BASE OF SHRUB BRANCHES FORM 3 CONTINUOUS RIM BACKFILL PLANT PIT ITH AMENE SOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS REMOE ALL CONTAINER MATERIAL PLACE OER UNISTURBE SOIL ATER AN TAMP POCKETS TO REMOE AIR UNISTURBE SOILAR ROOTBALL 1 NOTES 1 O NOT CUT LEAER PRUNE ALL AMAGE OR EA OO AFTER PLANTING STAKING MULCHING KEEP CRON SHAPE TPICAL OF SPECIES 3 REMOE ALL PLANTING LABELS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE B LANSCAPE ARCHITECT 4 REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL ESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION PROCEURES TO BE FOLLOE 3 335 Exhibit R - Page 17 of 81 ST COCO CO COCO TRANS W. 44TH AVE. N G R A Y S T 1"DR A1 1"DR A2 1" 1" 1" R SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 DZ DZ 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 5856 S LOWELL BLVD, UNIT32 #260 LITTLETON, CO 80123 303.883.3278 of 12 205 N 0 10 SCALE: 1"=10'-0" IRRIGATION PLAN IRRIGATION PLAN 5 EXTEND TWO SPARE CONTROL WIRES WITH COMMON FROM CONTROLLER "A" TO INDICATED LOCATION. STUB WIRES IN VALVE BOX CONTAINING QUICK COUPLING VALVE. Know what's below before you dig.Call R IRRIGATION DESIGN LINE SIZE LINE SIZE XCZ-100-PRB-LC 3/4" I.D. SCHEDULE 40 SOLVENT WELD PRO-C SERIES SCHEDULE 40 SOLVENT WELD GPM FEBCO RAIN BIRD HUNTER RAIN BIRD CENTENNIAL PLASTICS CONTROL VALVE SIZE CONTROLLER & STATION NO. DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY DRIP LINE BLOW-OUT STUB ELECTRIC CONTROLLER QUICK COUPLING VALVE BACKFLOW PREVENTER PVC MAINLINE 860 - 3/4" DIA. 44 LRC POLY DRIP TUBING PVC SLEEVING GATE VALVE 2 1 11 7 4 9 MODEL NO.SYMBOL MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION DETAIL NO.COMMENTS TIE ONTO 3/4" COPPER IRRIGATION STUB-OUT AT INDICATED LOCATION. INSTALL 3/4" REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, 3/4" INVERTED BOILER DRAIN AND EXTEND 3/4" K COPPER AT 18"-24" DEPTH AS SHOWN. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF COPPER PIPING WITH CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING FOUNDATION AND/OR FLOORING SO THAT NO COPPER PIPING IS VISIBLE ON BUILDING EXTERIOR. WITHIN LANDSCAPE AREA INSTALL ONE 3/4" MANUAL DRAIN VALVE, ONE 1" GATE VALVE, ONE QUICK COUPLING VALVE, ONE 1" MASTER VALVE AND EXTEND SCHEDULE 40 PVC MAINLINE AS SHOWN. WORK SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL CODE. FEES AND PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH WORK ARE TO BE OBTAINED AND PAID BY CONTRACTOR. FINAL LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO START OF WORK. WALL MOUNT ONE HUNTER PRO-C SERIES 4 STATION CONTROLLER AT INDICATED LOCATION. 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL POWER IS AVAILABLE WITHIN 20 L.F. OF CONTROLLER LOCATION. ELECTRICAL POWER AND CONNECTION TO CONTROLLER IS BY CONTRACTOR WITH WORK CONFORMING TO LOCAL CODE. FEES AND PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH WORK ARE TO BE OBTAINED AND PAID BY CONTRACTOR. FINAL LOCATION OF CONTROLLER SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. WRF-CLIKHUNTER WIRELESS RAIN/FREEZE SENSOR 10R PEB SERIES - 1" DIA.RAIN BIRD MASTER VALVE 6 12 3 3/4" DIA.MANUAL DRAIN VALVE 8 TLCV-06-18RAIN BIRD IN-LINE DRIP TREE RING 5 SLOPE COPPER PIPING AT 1% MIN. DOWN TO DRAIN VALVE 1" PVC IRRIG. WIRE CONDUIT RAIN/FREEZE SENSOR - MOUNT AT TOP OF WALL 18" DEPTH 3/4" K COPPER PIPING AT 18" MIN. MIN. DEPTH Exhibit R - Page 18 of 81 SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 DZ DZ 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 5856 S LOWELL BLVD, UNIT32 #260 LITTLETON, CO 80123 303.883.3278 of 12 CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY PRESSURE AT BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATION FOR EACH TAP PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING ANY IRRIGATION INSTALLATION AND NOTIFY CONSULTANT OF ANY DIFFERENCES FROM STATED PRESSURE. IF CONTRACTOR FAILS TO NOTIFY CONSULTANT HE ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY SYSTEM ALTERATIONS. SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED FOR A STATIC PRESSURE OF 80-90 PSI (PER DENVER WATER). REFER TO IRRIGATION TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION LAY-OUT REQUIREMENTS, COORDINATION AND PRIORITIES. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE LOCATED 36" MINIMUM FROM CENTERLINE OF ALL SWALES, 24" MINIMUM FROM EDGES OF ALL WALKS, CURBS, DRIVES AND OTHER HARD SURFACE AREAS. SEPARATE SLEEVE. IRRIGATION WIRE BUNDLE SHALL BE ROUTED IN SEPARATE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OF REPLACE ANY EXISTING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT, TURF, PLANT MATERIAL OR SITE FEATURES DAMAGED DURING NEW INSTALLATION. REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR OF DAMAGED EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE OWNER AND THE CONSULTANT. REFER TO PLANTING PLAN FOR EXACT TREE LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES, TREES SHOWN ON IRRIGATION PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF SLEEVING WITH INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE FLATWORK AND PAVING. ALL SLEEVING IS BY CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON IRRIGATION PLANS INSTALL SLEEVING BASED ON SLEEVE SIZING GUIDE BELOW: NOTE: EACH LENGTH OF SLEEVED PIPE SHOWN SHALL BE ROUTED THROUGH SLEEVE/CONDUIT WITHOUT IRRIGATION PIPING PIPE SIZE OR WIRE QUANTITY TAP LOCATION/NUMBER 8. 7. 5. 6. 4. 1-25 CONTROL WIRES 3/4" - 1" PIPING 1 1-2" PVC SLEEVE 55 PSIREQUIRED PRESSURE REQUIRED SLEEVE 1-2" PVC SLEEVE REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION PROCEDURES. ALL BASE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM DRAWINGS PREPARED BY SEVEN 29 DESIGN. 1. 3. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO WINTERIZE THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN THE FALL OF THE YEAR IN WHICH THE IRRIGATION & LANDSCAPE WAS ACCEPTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PERFORM SYSTEM START-UP IN APRIL OF THE FOLLOWING SPRING. ALL IRRIGATION WIRE SHALL BE #14 AWG UFUL WIRE WITH SINGLE, SOLID COPPER CONDUCTOR AND POLYETHYLENE INSULATION (MULTI-CONDUCTOR WIRE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE). WIRE COLORS SHALL BE: CONTROL WIRES - RED, COMMON WIRE - WHITE, SPARE WIRES - BLACK, MASTER VALVE - BLUE. WATERTIGHT WIRE SPLICES SHALL BE MADE WITH 3M CO. DBR/Y-6 SPLICE KITS. 10. ALL VALVE BOXES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY CARSON INDUSTRIES. MODELS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: #910-10: QUICK COUPLING VALVES, DRIP LINE BLOW-OUT STUBS, GATE VALVES, DRAIN VALVES. #1220-12: DRIP VALVES ASSEMBLIES, FLOW SENSOR, MASTER VALVE BOXES AND LIDS SHALL BE GREEN. CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY ALL WORK (MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND WORKMANSHIP) FOR A ONE YEAR PERIOD FOLLOWING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION BY OWNER. 12. 9. 11. INSTALL ASSEMBLY TO REST ON GRAVEL SUMP. CONTAIN ENTIRE ASSEMBLY WITHIN BOX. NO VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED PROVIDE 2" MIN. CLEARANCE BETWEEN TOP OF FILTER AND BOTTOM OF BOX LID TOP OF VALVE BOX TO BE FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE NOTE: STAINLESS STEEL WORM GEAR CLAMP & 1" INSxMIPT ADAPTER RAIN BIRD 1" PEB CONTROL VALVE 1" POLYETHYLENE DRIP SUPPLY PIPING TO FIRST TEE LOCATION RAIN BIRD 1" PRB100 BASKET FILTER W/ 200 MESH SCREEN VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON DRIP TUBING/PIPING DUCTILE IRON, GASKETED FITTING - REFER SERVICE TEE - SOLVENT WELD PVC OR 1" SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE - LENGTH AS 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP - FILL BOX TO CONTROL WIRE BUNDLE REQUIRED TO SPECIFICATIONS CENTER BOX OVER ASSEMBLY AND COMMON WIRING WITHIN VALVE BOX (RE: SPECS.) PROVIDE 12" CONTINUOUS COILS OF ALL SPARE CONTROL & STATION NUMBER. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. BRAND BOX LID WITH CONTROLLER FINISH GRADE 1" SCH. 40 PVC BALL VALVE (FxF) W/ TWO 1"x2" SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLES BOTTOM OF ASSEMBLY (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL) PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGSAPPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO 1" SCH. 40 FxF COUPLING AND INSERTxMIPT ADAPTER ADAPTER OUTSIDE OF VALVE BOX. LENGTH IN BOX TO EXTEND HOSE 3/4" DRIP TUBING - COIL SUFFICIENT 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP (1 CU. FT.) WITH CAP COMPRESSION (OR INSERT) FITTING TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS."DB" INTO VALVE BOX LID. REFER 10" ROUND VALVE BOX - BRAND FINISH GRADE INDICATOR AND SWING PIPE 6" HUNTER ECO-ID OPERATIONAL COMPRESSION-TYPE OR INSERT TEE (W/ CLAMPS) DEFLECT TUBING TO PERMIT ENTRY THROUGH THROUGH BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX. PLAN POLY DRIP TUBING - FROM VALVE INSERT FITTING WITH S.S. CLAMPS (TWO CLAMPS DRIPPERLINE WITH IN-LINE 0.6 GPH EMITTERSAT 18" O.C. (NETAFIM TLCV-06-18) - INSTALL 12-18 " PER JOINT) ON SOIL SURFACE STAKED AT 48" INTERVALS EDGE OF ROOTBALL RAIN BIRD XQ POLY MICRO-TUBING (5 FT. MAX. LENGTH) RAIN BIRD XB SERIES DRIP EMITTER - REFER TO CHART PER TREE 1 1/2" CALIPER TREE 2" CALIPER TREE 2 1/2" CALIPER TREE 6 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE 8 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE 1.0 GPH 1.0 GPH 1.0 GPH 1.0 GPH 1.0 GPH FOUR EACH SIX EACH SIX EACH FOUR EACH THREE EACH EMITTER - ALL EMITTERS TO CONTACT -REFER TO NOTES FOR PLAN MULCH - RE: LANDSCAPE PLANTING BACKFILL MATERIAL EMITTER QUANTITY AND MODEL # PLANT ROOTBALL TUBING ANCHOR STAKE @ 7 FT. INTERVALS POLY DRIP TUBING WEED BARRIER FABRIC - WHERE PLANT MATERIAL EMITTER ROOTBALL NOTE: SECTION IF PLANTING ON A 4:1 SLOPE OR GREATER, INSTALL EMITTERS ON UPHILL FLUSH ALL LINES THOROUGHLY PRIOR TO EMITTER INSTALLATION. INSTALL EMITTERS ON OPPOSING SIDES OF ROOTBALL. SIDE OF ROOTBALL. INSTALL TWO 1/2 GPH EMITTERS PER 5 GAL. SHRUB, ONE 1/2 GPH EMITTER PER 1 GAL. PLANT APPLICABLE 1/4" BARBED TEE (RAIN BIRD XBF3TEE OR EQUAL) MICRO-TUBE STAKE (RAIN BIRD TS-025) 1/4" POLYETHYLENE MICRO-TUBING 1/4" MICRO-TUBING 1/4" TUBING STAKE ASSEMBLY. NOTE: CENTER BOX OVER VALVE BOTTOM OF VALVE AND PIPING 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP - ADD TO RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH EXTENSION - BRAND "MV" INTO VALVE BOX LID. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. DIAMETERFOR MANUFACTURER, MODEL # AND REFER TO EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ELECTRIC MASTER CONTROL VALVE FINISH GRADE PRESSURE MAINLINE SLIPxMIPT SCH. 40 PVC ADAPTER (2) #14 AWG UFUL WIRES (MASTER VALVE SOLENOID) - ONE BLUE, ONE GREEN - EXTEND TO CONTROLLER - (RE: IRRIG. 36" COIL #14 AWG UFUL WIRING (SPAREMASTER VALVE WIRE) - BROWN. (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL)PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGS APPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO WATERPROOF WIRE SPLICE KIT - RE: SPECS VALVE BOX. REFER TO BRAND "GV" ON LID OF 3" GATE VALVE W/ CROSS HANDLE PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE PRESSURE MAINLINE AND CONTACT TOP OF BOTTOM TO BE NOTCHED6" CLASS 160 PVC SLEEVE 10" ROUND VALVE BOX SCH. 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER (2) - SIZE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. FINISH GRADE TO EQUAL GATE VALVE DIAMETER 2" OF 6" PVC ACCESS SLEEVEFILL BOX TO WITHIN 2" OF TOP 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP - UNDISTURBED SOIL AND SOLID WEDGE DISC (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL)PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGS APPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO IRRIGATION DETAILS 6 Exhibit R - Page 19 of 81 SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 22031 02.21.2024 DZ DZ 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO As Shown LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 5856 S LOWELL BLVD, UNIT32 #260 LITTLETON, CO 80123 303.883.3278 of 12 IRRIGATION DETAILS 7 1" BRASS NIPPLE LENGTH AS REQUIRED 3" OF BOTTOM OF QCV LID SPECIFICATIONS. LID. REFER TO TECHNICAL BRAND "QC" INTO VALVE BOX 10" ROUND VALVE BOX QUICK COUPLING VALVE SUMP - FILL BOX TO WITHIN 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK FINISH GRADE 3 3" SOLVENT WELD OR GASKETED FITTINGREFER TO SPECIFICATIONS PRESSURE MAINLINE SERVICE TEE - 1-1"x3" SCH.80 PVC NIPPLE 1" SCH.80 PVC FIPxFIP 90 ELL 1"x12" SCH.80 PVC NIPPLE 1" BRASS FIPxFIP 90 ELL 1" SCH.80 PVC FIPxFIP 1-1x3" SCH.80 PVC NIPPLE 90 ELL (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL)PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGS APPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE SEE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP 3/4"x4" PVC NIPPLE SCH. 80 3/4" MxF SCH.40 PVC 90 ELL SOIL BLANKET COVERING SUMP 3/4" BRASS BALL CURB VALVE W/ SLOT-TYPE OPERATOR FOR SUMP SIZE 4" FINISH GRADE 3/4"x6" BRASS NIPPLE - LENGTH AS REQUIRED 3/4"xCL PVC NIPPLE SCH. 80 (2)3/4" FxF SCH.80 PVC 90 ELL (2) 2" CL200 PVC ACCESS SLEEVE - 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONSTHE LETTER "D" IN LID- REFER TO 10" ROUND VALVE BOX - BRAND LENGTH AS REQUIRED 1 CU. FT. 2" VALVE MARKER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE OF MAIN PIPING (SPEARS BLUE 75 OR EQUAL)PETROLEUM DISTILLATES TO ALL MALE-THREADED FITTINGS APPLY NON-HARDENING THREAD SEALANT CONTAINING NO A.Y. McDONALD 76101 SERIES TOP OF SENSOR TO BE ABOVE GUTTER WITHIN CONTROLLER PEDESTAL NOTE: MOUNT RAIN SENSOR RECEIVER SECURE BRACKET VIA WOOD SCREWS OR SIMILAR HUNTER ADJUSTABLE LENGTH MOUNTING HUNTER WIRELESS RAIN/FREEZE-CLIK - BUILDING EAVE, FENCE POST, ETC. AND/OR ANY OBSTRUCTIONS ARM FINAL LOCATION OF SENSOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2" TYPE "L" RIGID COPPER TUBING SECURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY FASTEN TUBING TO FINISH FLOOR @ 18" 0.C. AND COPPER TUBING TO WALL VIA UNI-STRUT CHANNEL AND COPPER FASTENERS AT 6 FT. O.C. DISCHARGE BACKFLOW PREVENTER DRAIN INTO FINISH FLOOR FLOOR DRAIN FEBCO 860 REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW TYPE "K" RIGID COPPER TO SOFT AREA 3/4" I.P. MALE BRASS BOILER DRAIN PREVENTER FLOW FEBCO 601 AIR GAP DRAIN W/ WHEEL HANDLE CxCxF TEE CxM ADAPTER - LINE SIZE WATER METER UPSTREAM OF ANY PRESSURE COLD WATER SERVICE LINE DOWNSTREAM OF TYPE "K" RIGID COPPER - CONNECT TO BUILDING REDUCING VALVES OR OTHER BUILDING SERVICE EQUIPMENT 12" MIN. 18" BACKFILL MATERIAL (TYPICAL) CONTROL WIRES PVC MAINLINE FINISH GRADE REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND FOUNDATION COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF CONDUIT WITH CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOR 18" FINISH GRADE ELECTRIC CONTROLLER SECURE CONDUIT TO INTERIOR WALL @ SECURE CONTROLLER TO WALLWITH ANCHOR BOLTS 60" MAX.54" MIN. PVC CONDUIT W/ SWEEP ELL (TYP. UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS) RING EMT MALE ADAPTER W/ WASHER & LOCK EMT CONDUIT - SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE CONTROL WIRE QUANTITY 24" 0.C. FINISH FLOOR EMT MALE ADAPTER & PVC FEMALE ADAPTER 18" MIN. J-BOX (120 VOLT ELECTRICAL) 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL CONDUIT 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL WIRING SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH IRRIGATION WIRE CONDUIT CONDUIT(S) SHALL BE CONTINUOUS. IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRE CONDUIT(S) SHALL TERMINATE WITHIN LANDSCAPE AREA. NOTES: Exhibit R - Page 20 of 81 TRASH CONTAINER (BY OWNER) SL O P E 1 / 8 " P E R F T . 8"11' - 4"8" 8" 9' - 4 " 8" 1' - 0 " 10 ' - 8 " 0" +1" 6" DIAMETER X 4' HIGH CONCRETE-FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. (TYP. OF 5) 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE WITH #4S AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE APRON WITH #4S AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES TO BE 1 1/2" STEEL DECKING WELDED TO 1 3/4" X 1 3/4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. PAINT, EPT-1 1' - 6"1' - 6"4' - 2"4' - 2" 3"3" 2"4" 4" X 4" X 1/4" STEEL POST EMBEDDED 2'-0" MIN. IN TO CONCRETE FOOTING. WELD PLATE ON TOP, MAKE WATER-TIGHT AND PAINT EPT-1 CMU WITH CONCAVE TOOLED JOINTS 8 7 1' - 4"10' - 0"1' - 4" 12' - 8" 4"2"9' - 0" APPLIED STONE-LOOK FINISH OVER CMU STRUCTURE. APPLIED STONE LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 6' - 8 " 4" 7' - 0 " 6" DIAMETER X 4' HIGH CONCRETE-FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. (TYP. OF 5) TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES TO BE 1 1/2" STEEL DECKING WELDED TO 1 3/4" X 1 3/4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. PAINT EPT-1. 4" X 4" X 1/4" STEEL POST EMBEDDED 2'-0" MIN. IN TO CONCRETE FOOTING. WELD PLATE ON TOP, MAKE WATER-TIGHT AND PAINT EPT-1. 6' - 6 " 12' - 8" NOTE: PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL 1/2" DIA x 24" CANE BOLT 1 1/4" GATE PULLS HASP LOCK HORIZONTAL REINFORCING 8" CMU WITH STEEL REINFORCING AND GROUT NOTE: GROUT SOLID ALL MASONRY COURSES BELOW GRADE APPLY 2 COATS OF WATERPROOFING COATING TO ALL EXPOSED CMU AND CMU GROUT JOINTS 4X NOM. SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 8" KNOCK-OUT, REINFORCED BOND BEAM 4" CONCRETE FOUNDATION & REINFORCING, RE: STRUCTURAL 7' - 0 " CONCRETE SLAB. RE: CIVIL APPLIED STONE-LOOK FINISH OVER CMU STRUCTURE. WELD HINGE TO POST AND GATE EMBED STEEL POST IN CONCRETE FOUNDATION 2' DEPTH MIN. 2"4" 3 5 / 8 " VERTICAL REINFORCING PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS GROUT CELLS SOLID GATE ASSEMBLY AS IDENTIFIED ALIGN AL I G N 6" DIAMETER CONCRETE- FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. 7'- 0 " APPLIED STONE LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 6'- 8 " 4" 10' - 8" 4 8 7'- 0 " APPLIED STONE LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 4 8 6'- 8 " 4" 12' - 8" 4' - 0 " 3' - 6 " 2' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 6" DIA. PAINTED STEEL PIPE x 6'-0" FILL w/ CONCRETE AND MOUND TOP 2 -10" #5 BARS WELDED TO SIDE OF PIPE 16" DIA x 3'-6" DEEP CONCRETE BASE COAT ALL EXPOSED STEEL w/ ASPHALTIC PAINT PRIOR TO SETTING IN CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPE. TYPICAL 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED CROSS STRIPES AT 24" O.C. UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL. PAINT WITH 4" WIDE STRIPING 11' - 0" 5' - 0" 13'-0" PRE-CAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP RESERVED PARKING ACCESSIBLE VAN FINISH GRADE CONCRETE FOOTING WHITE LETTERING WHITE BORDER, SYMBOL AND LETTERING BLUE FIELD COLOR NO. 15090 IN FEDERAL STANDARD 599B REFLECTORIZED SIGN CONSTRUCTED OF PORCELAIN STEEL WITH BEADED TEXT OR EQUAL 2" DIA GALVANIZED PIPE SET IN CONCRETE 18" BELOW GRADE BLUE FIELD COLOR NO. 15090 IN FEDERAL STANDARD 599B 12" 6 " 2 " 1 ' - 6 " 6 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6 " 12" CLEARANCE _'-_" PAYSTATION KIOSK BEHIND, BY OWNER CLEARANCE BAR POST, PAINT WHITE CLEARANCE SIGN, BY OWNER. HANGING CHAIN TOP RAIL, PAINT WHITE LIGHT FIXTURE AND LIGHT POLE RAISED CONCRETE ISLAND RE : E L E C T R I C A L 3' - 0 " 10 8 " LIGHTPOLE PAYSTATION 10 8 " CLEARANCE SIGN PLACED INTO CONCRETE WITH BASE AT FINISHED FLOOR 6" AMP NOTE: COORDINATE SET BOLTS AND CONDUITS WITH CARWASH EQUIPMENT VENDOR & OWNER BEFORE ISLAND INFILL CONCRETE IS POURED. ** MOUNTING SURFACE MUST BE FLAT AND LEVEL PAYSTATION KIOSK, BY OWNER 36 " CLEARANCE SIGN 24"18" PAYSTATION MOUNTING SURFACE TO BE FLAT AND LEVEL LIGHT FIXTURE ANCHOR PLATE 16 " 2" AMP BASE 6" CONCRETE BASE, RE: STRUCTURAL SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 3 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 2 8 : 5 7 P M As indicated SITE DETAILS 2202.58 8 3/11/2024 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1/4" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN - CMU1 1/4" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION - CMU2 3/8" = 1'-0"8 ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION4 1 1/2" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE DETAIL - CMU5 1/4" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION - CMU3 1/4" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION - CMU6 1/2" = 1'-0"8 PIPE BOLLARD7 1/2" = 1'-0"8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN8 1/8" = 1'-0"8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL - WIDE9 3/8" = 1'-0"8 DTL-AUTOPAY ELEVATION-APPROACH11 3/8" = 1'-0"8 DTL-AUTOPAY ELEVATION-FRONT12 3/8" = 1'-0"8 DTL-AUTOPAY PLAN13 Exhibit R - Page 21 of 81 M TRANS X X X X X X X X X X WEST 44TH AVENUE GR A Y S T R E E T PROPOSED BUILDING PB PB AA AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB CC CC DDDD AA PB PB SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 2202.58 11.15.2023 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO AS NOTED JCB JCB 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com LIGHTING PLAN 1" = 10'-0" LIGHTING PLAN N Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Lum. Watts Lum. Lumens LLF Catalog 2 CC 25.4 3462 1.000 Calculation Summary Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Site Fc 1.46 9.7 0.0 N.A.N.A. M.H. 10'-0"COOPER - ISW-AF-1000-LED-E1-T4FT 4 AA 34.0 4880 COOPER - GLEON-SA1A-750-U-T4FT18'-0"1.000 COLOR BLACK BLACK 22 BB 21.3 1187 COOPER - LD6B10D010 EU6B10208040 6LBSLI112'-0"1.000 BLACK 2 DD BY CITY CITY PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT NOT IN CALC. GRADE 36" 15'-0" POLE LIGHT ELEVATION 'AA' PB 2 PB BY CITY CITY PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT PULL BOX E11 Exhibit R - Page 22 of 81 SHEET CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E 2202.58 11.15.2023 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 AUTOWASH LAKESIDE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO AS NOTED JCB JCB 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com E12 11 OF12 FIXTURE AA: GLEON-SA1B-740-U-T4FT1 FIXTURE BB: LD6B10D010 EU6B10208040 6LBSLI12 3 FIXTURE CC: ISW-AF-1000-LED-E1-T4FT11 OF12 11 OF12 LIGHTING DETAILS Exhibit R - Page 23 of 81 PROJECT SITE N ARCHITECTURE •PLANNING •DEVELOPMENT VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CODE ANALYSIS: BUILDING ATTRIBUTES: BUILDING HEIGHT (STORIES): BUILDING HEIGHT (FEET): TOTAL BUILDING AREA PER FLOOR (EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL) THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR BASEMENT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION INCIDENTAL USE: ACCESSORY USE: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM ALLOWABLE MAXIMUMS: CONSTRUCTION AREA BUILDING HEIGHT(STORIES): BUILDING HEIGHT (FEET): BUILDING AREA (PER FLOOR): APPLICABLE CODES: GRAND TOTALS (TABULAR AREA) (FRONTAGE INCREASE) (SPRINKLER INCREASE) NEW EXISTING THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. COPYRIGHT NOTICE TOTALS 0 SF 0 SF 3539 SF 0 SF 3539 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 3539 SF 0 SF 3539 SF No No C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 3 7 A M 0 0" 1 30' -0" B -BUSINESS V-B No 2 40' -0" 9000 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2018 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE 2018 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 2018 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE 2018 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE 2023 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AUTOWASH LAKESIDE 5900 W 44TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80212 JAMES TROY KIRSCHMAN 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATION FIXTURES REQUIRED PROVIDED TOILETS 1 1 LAVATORIES 1 1 DRINKING FOUNTAINS 0 0 SERVICE SINK 0 1 1. PER IPC SECTION 403.2 EXCEPTION 2, SEPARATE FACILITIES ARE NOT REQUIRED WITH 15 OR FEWER OCCUPANTS. 2. PER IPC SECTION 410.2 USES WITH LESS THAN 15 OCCUPANTS DOES NOT REQUIRE A DRINKING FOUNTAIN. 3. PER IPC TABLE 403.1 E, BUSINESS OCCUPANCIES WITH LESS THAN 15 OCCUPANTS DO NOT REQUIRE A SERVICE SINK. STRUCTURAL WALLACE ENGINEERING 9800 PYRAMID COURT, SUITE 350 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 407-5281 WRICE@WALLACESC.COM ATTN: WIN RICE MEP ENGINEERS 3 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1415 PARK AVE WEST DENVER, CO 80205 (720) 810-5714 BP@3CONSULTINGENGINEERS.COM ATTN: BRUCE PACHIKARA LANDSCAPE SEVEN 29 DESIGN 5856 S LOWELL BLVD UNIT 32 #260 LITTLETON, CO 80123 (303) 883-3278 CMARCH@SEVEN29DESIGN.COM ATTN: CHRIS MARCH CIVIL ENGINEERS PROOF CIVIL 800 WEST 8TH AVE #104 DENVER, CO 80204 (303) 325-5709 TLYON@PROOFCIVIL.COM ATTN: TODD LYON SHEET LIST SHEET #SHEET NAME REVISION # REVISION DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION ARCHITECTURAL A0-1 COVER SHEET A0-2 GENERAL NOTES A0-3 ACCESSIBLITY A1-0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - DEMO A1-1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1 5/27/2024 CITY CMMTS A1-2 SITE DETAILS 1 5/27/2024 CITY CMMTS A1-3 SITE DETAILS A2-1 FLOOR PLAN 1 5/27/2024 CITY CMMTS A2-2 EQUIPMENT PLAN A2-3 EQUIPMENT PLATFORM A2-4 EQUIPMENT NOTES A2-5 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A2-6 ROOF PLAN 1 5/27/2024 CITY CMMTS A3-1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3-2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4-1 BUILDING SECTIONS A4-2 BUILDING SECTIONS A5-1 WALL SECTIONS A5-2 WALL SECTIONS A6-1 DETAILS A6-2 DETAILS A7-1 ENLARGED PLANS AND INT ELEV A8-1 DOOR TYPES AND DETAILS A8-2 WINDOW TYPES AND DETAILS A8-3 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE CAR WASH DETAILS CW-1 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT DETAILS CW-2 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT DETAILS CW-3 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT DETAILS CW-4 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT DETAILS STRUCTURAL S1-0 GENERAL NOTES S2-0 FOUNDATION PLAN S2-1 ROOF FRAMING PLAN S2-2 PLATFORM FRAMING PLAN S3-0 SECTIONS AND DETAILS S3-1 SECTIONS AND DETAILS S3-2 SECTIONS AND DETAILS MECHANICAL M0-1 MECHANICAL COVER SHEET M0-2 MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS M0-3 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES M1-1 MECHANICAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN M1-2 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN M1-3 MECHANICAL ROOF PLAN PLUMBING P0-1 PLUMBING COVER SHEET P0-2 PLUMBING SCHEDULES P1-1 PLUMBING FIRST FLOOR PLAN P1-2 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN P1-3 PLUMBING ROOF PLAN P2-1 PLUMBING DETAILS P2-2 PLUMBING ISOMETRICS ELECTRICAL E0-1 ELECTRICAL COVER SHEET E0-2 ELECTRICAL LEGEND E1-0 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN E1-1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN E1-2 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN E2-1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN E2-2 ELECTRICAL POWER EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN E3-1 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE & SCHEDULES E3-2 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES & COM-CHECK OCCUPANCY LOAD CALCS FUNCTION OF SPACE AREA OCCUPANCY LOAD FACTOR # OF OCCUPANTS(SF) (B) OCCUPANCY STORAGE / EQUIPMENT AREAS 827 SF 300 4 UNOCCUPIED 2412 SF 0 GRAND TOTAL 3240 SF 4 OWNER AUTOWASH COMPANIES 7005 E 46TH AVE DR, UNIT B DENVER, CO 80216 (303) 514-0905 DENNIS@AUTOWASHCO.COM ATTN: DENNIS DREESZEN 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 24 of 81 GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY PERFORMED BY: CONTACT: DOCUMENT: KUMAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2390 SOUTH LIPAN STREET DENVER, CO 80223 (303) 742-9700 KAMAL M. HASAN TITLE: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY AND PAVEMENT THICKNESS DESIGN PROJECT #: NO. 22-1-620 DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2022 A.F.F. 10'-11" ROOM NAME B OFFICE 1400 SF 1:100 OLF 80 OCC 1 A101 1 A -NORTH ARROW -HEIGHT/SPOT ELEVATION -ROOM TAG -REVISION CLOUD & TAG -MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT TAG -KEYNOTE NUMBER -BUILDING SECTION -WALL SECTION -DOOR TAG -ENLARGED DETAIL CALLOUT -GRID LINE -WINDOW TAG -WALL TAG REFERENCE SYMBOLS 1 TA-1 -PARTIAL INTERIOR ELEVATION 01A AC 0 1 5 R 1 ?12.400 -EXTERIOR ELEVATION -BREAK LINE SCALE : 1" = 40'-0" 0 40'80'20' -VIEW SCALE N -SECTION -FULL INTERIOR ELEVATION A1011 A101 A1011 A1011 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A101 1 A101 1 A101 1 A101 GENERAL NOTES (CONTINUED) * GENERAL NOTES APPLY TO ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS A.GENERAL 1. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS WILL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND WILL VERIFY EXISTING SITE AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID. ALL SUBCONTRACTORS WILL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, SUPERVISION, AND MATERIALS AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN A GOOD AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER ACCORDING TO THE TRUE INTENT AND MEANING OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THIS ARCHITECT AND HIS PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS WILL NOT HAVE CONTROL OF AND WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, PROCEDURES OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT OR FOR THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTOR OR ANY OTHER PERSONS PERFORMING ANY OF THE WORK ON THIS SITE, NOR FOR THE FAILURE OF ANY OF THEM TO CARRY OUT THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 3. ALL CONTRACTORS WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE BRACING AND SHORING TO ENSURE STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF THE BUILDING AND ALL RELATED BUILDING COMPONENTS, IE: STRUCTURAL WALLS, INTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLIES, ETC. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. WORK WILL BE COORDINATED WITH ALL TRADES IN ORDER TO AVOID INTERFERENCE, AND AVOID OMISSIONS. 5. ALL MATERIALS USED WILL BE NEW AND BEAR U.L. LABELS WHERE REQUIRED AND MEET APPROPRIATE N.E.M.A. STANDARDS. 6. LAYOUT ALL PARTITIONS BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT ERRORS BY DISCREPANCY. ALL DRYWALL PARTITIONS WILL BE INSTALLED AS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. EACH SUBCONTRACTOR WILL AMEND AND MAKE GOOD AT HIS OWN COST, ANY DEFECTS OR OTHER FAULTS IN HIS WORKMANSHIP AND/OR HIS SUPPLIED MATERIALS. 8. ALL CONTRACTORS WILL GUARANTEE ALL LABOR AND CONTRACTOR PROVIDED MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF OCCUPANCY. 9. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO ORDERING, CUTTING AND/OR INSTALLING MATERIAL, PRODUCT OR EQUIPMENT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONTACT THE PROJECT ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THAT WORK. 10. ALL SUBCONTRACTORS WILL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE CANNOT BE TERMINATED OR CANCELED WITHOUT 10 DAYS PRIOR WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 11. ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES TO WORK MUST BE AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD. NO ALTERATIONS WILL BE MADE ON THIS PROJECT EXCEPT UPON WRITTEN ORDER BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD. 12. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF ANY KIND FOR MATERIALS SPECIFIED ON THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS ALLOWED. NO "EQUIVALENT" SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE MADE, UNLESS DUE TO THE LACK OF AVAILABILITY OF THE ORIGINAL MATERIAL SPECIFIED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE PROJECT ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD. 13. WEATHER CONDITIONS: CONTRACTORS WILL PROTECT ALL PARTS OF THEIR WORK FROM WEATHER DAMAGE DUE TO FROST, RAIN, HEAT, ETC. AND WILL MAKE GOOD TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PROJECT ARCHITECT AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR ANY PORTION OF THE WORK WHICH MAY HAVE BECOME DAMAGED. 14. RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTORS: EACH SUBCONTRACTOR AND THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS. EACH SUBCONTRACTOR AND THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARE AND PROTECTION OF HIS OWN WORK AND MATERIALS. 15. SITE SAFETY: EACH CONTRACTOR WILL ABIDE BY LOCAL AREA STANDARDS AND RELATED OSHA STANDARDS FOR THE PROTECTION AND SAFETY FOR THEIR EMPLOYEES ON SITE. THIS ARCHITECT AND HIS PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS WILL BE HELD HARMLESS BY THE OWNER, GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND RELATED AWARDED TRADES ON THIS PROJECT FOR ACCIDENTS OR INJURIES CAUSED OR ACCRUED ON THIS PROPERTY DURING THE PRE/ACTUAL/POST CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 16. LIENS: ALL SUBCONTRACTORS AND THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL DELIVER TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, A COMPLETE RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THIS CONTRACT. 17. PILFERAGE: EACH CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS OWN EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED IN CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING THOSE ITEMS FURNISHED BY THE OWNER AND DELIVERED TO THE JOB SITE, TO BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. THE OWNER WILL NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR STOLEN EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS OR DAMAGE OF THE SAME ON THIS JOB SITE. 18. GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF DEBRIS ACCUMULATED BY EACH TRADE. HOWEVER, EACH TRADE WILL KEEP THE JOB SITE CLEAN AND SAFE AT ALL TIMES, ALONG WITH A BROOM FINISH AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. 19. REFER TO STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS. 20. MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS NOTES ARE TYPICAL IN NATURE AND APPLY TO MULTIPLE DRAWINGS. NOTES ON ANY ONE DRAWING ARE TO APPLY TO ALL OTHER SIMILAR MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE GENERAL NOTES APPLY TO ALL THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21. ELEVATIONS REFERENCED ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS ARE TOP OF SLAB LEVELS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 22. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE TERM "BY OWNER" SHALL MEAN ITEM PROVIDED BY OWNER AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR AS PART OF THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT. THE TERM "NOT IN CONTRACT" (NIC) SHALL MEAN ITEM PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACT. 23. ALL WALLS SHALL EXTEND TO UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR OR ROOF DECK ABOVE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 24. SCRIBE GYPSUM BOARD OF WALL AND PARTITIONS TO IRREGULARITIES OF DECK ABOVE. SEAL TIGHTLY AROUND ANY PARTITIONS. FILL IRREGULARITIES BETWEEN TOP OF WALL AND DECK ABOVE WITH FIRE SAVING INSULATION OR FIRE STOPPING MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO MEET FIRE RATING OF RESPECTIVE WALLS. 25. ALL WALLS OF FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION SHALL EXTEND TO UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR OR ROOF DECK ABOVE AND ACHIEVE PROPER FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING. 26. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BRACING OF NON-LOAD BEARING MASONRY WALLS. 27. GYPSUM BOARD SURFACES SHALL BE ISOLATED WITH CONTROL JOINTS WHERE SHOWN ON DRAWINGS AND AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. 28. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL WALL BASE (TYP) AROUND CASEWORK AND MILLWORK. 29. THE OWNER SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: A. FURNITURE NOT IN CONTRACT B. EQUIPMENT NOT IN CONTRACT 30. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE CONTRACTOR WITH ROUGH-IN INFORMATION NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE INSTALLATION OF OWNER FURNISHED AND INSTALLED ITEMS. A.GENERAL (CONTINUED) 31. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE ALL OWNER FURNISHED AND INSTALLED ITEMS IN THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE, AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER TO ACCOMMODATE THESE ITEMS. 32. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADHERING TO THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 33. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL MECHANICAL CHASE SIZES WITH THE MECHANICAL SUB-CONTRACTOR. 34. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUB- CONTRACTORS SIZE AND LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT PADS. FOR HOUSEKEEPING PAD DETAILS SEE MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 35. EXTEND FURRING CHANNELS AND GYPSUM BOARD UP TO UNDERSIDE OF MTL. DECK ON ALL WALLS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 36. SEE WALL SECTIONS, ENLARGED PLANS AND STRUCTURAL FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION NOT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLANS. 37. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GWB WALLS ABOVE ALL DOOR FRAMES. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS AT BOTH CORNERS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE DOOR FRAME FROM TOP OF DOOR TO CEILING. 38. STRUCTURAL NOTES SHALL GOVERN TYPICAL CONDITIONS WHETHER OR NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILED OR NOTED. 39. CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN CONCRETE FLOOR SLABS AND MASONRY WALLS WHETHER OR NOT SPECIFICALLY REFERENCED ON PLANS. THE MAXIMUM AREA PERMITTED BETWEEN JOINTS SHALL BE 650 SF FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE SLABS, 250 SF FOR NON-REINFORCED SLABS AND 400 SF FOR MASONRY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 40. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY ELECTRIC CONNECTIONS, METERS, TRANSFORMERS AND GENERATORS. 41. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LOCATE ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND SWITCHES TO AVOID CASEWORK, DOORS, ETC. 42. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF VERIFYING IN THE FIELD BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS, AND COORDINATING ALL NEW UTILITY LOCATIONS, CONNECTIONS AND PENETRATIONS WITH THE CIVIL ENGINEER. 43. ALL FLOORS WITH DRAINS ARE SLOPED A MINIMUM OF 1/8" PER FOOT TO DRAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 44. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN ACTUAL CONDITIONS AND PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT. B.DIMENSIONING 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET-INCHES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. DIMENSIONS GOVERN. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 3. VERIFY DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 4. EXTERIOR WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED TO THE FACE OF STUD AT FRAME WALLS, FACE OF CONCRETE WALLS AND FACE OF MASONRY WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. INTERIOR WALLS AND PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED TO STUD FACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. DOORS ARE LOCATED BY THEIR JAMB RELATIVE TO ADJACENT WALLS AND PARTITIONS. DOOR OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED TO THE STRIKE OR HINGE FACE OF THE DOOR FRAMES. ALL INTERIOR DOORS AT 6" FROM PARTITION WALL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 7. DIMENSIONS FOR DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE SHOWN NOMINAL. ALLOW FOR 1/4"-INCH (10) SHIM AND SEALANT OF EXTERIOR FRAMES. C.MISCELLANEOUS 1. SEAL EXTERIOR JOINTS AROUND DOORS, WINDOWS AND LOUVER FRAMES AND AT PENETRATIONS OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING ELEMENTS TO PREVENT AIR AND WATER LEAKAGE. 2. ISOLATE DISSIMILAR METALS EFFECTIVELY FROM EACH OTHER TO PREVENT ELECTROLYTIC ACTION. 3. PROVIDE ACCESS PANELS AS REQUIRED FOR MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING VALVES. 4. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH ALL WALLS. RATED WALLS SHALL BE SEALED WITH FIRE STOPPING MATERIAL AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE THE RESPECTIVE FIRE- RESISTIVE RATING AND SMOKE STOPPAGE. SEE PROJECT MANUAL. 5. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL WOOD BLOCKING IN METAL STUD PARTITIONS FOR THE PROPER ANCHORAGE OF ALL WALL ATTACHED ITEMS: I.E. TOILET ACCESSORIES, CASEWORK, MILLWORK, WALL-MOUNTED FIXTURES, MARKER BOARDS, TACK BOARDS, ETC. 6. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS CABINETS TO BE MOUNTED WITH TOP OF CABINET AT 48" A.F.F. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS w/ BRACKETS TO BE MOUNTED w/ TOP OF BOTTLE AT 48" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. SEE CABINET DETAILS AND PLAN FOR LOCATIONS. 7. ALL HANDICAP FACILITIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH APPROVED ADA SIGNAGE. 8. REFERENCE COMCHECK REPORT FOR INSULATION R-VALUES AT THERMAL ENVELOPE. GENERAL NOTES WALL NOMENCLATURE A C 015 R -1 PARTITION WALL TYPE CONSTRUCTION STRUCTURAL MEMBER MATERIAL STRUCTURAL MEMBER SIZE FIRE RATED PARTITION CONSTRUCTION SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 3 9 A M As indicated GENERAL NOTES 2202.58 A0-2 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 ABBREVIATIONS ABBREVIATION COMMENTS AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AP ACCESS PANEL ACP ACOUSTICAL CEILING PANEL ACT ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE ADH ADHESIVE ADJ ADJUSTABLE AHU AIR HANDLING UNIT ALT ALTERNATE ALUM ALUMINUM AB ANCHOR BOLT APC ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE BSMT BASEMENT BM BENCH MARK BLKNG BLOCKING BD BOARD BOT BOTTOM BO BOTTOM OF BLDG BUILDING CI CAST IRON CLG CEILING CL CENTERLINE CT CERAMIC TILE CO CLEAN OUT CLR CLEAR COL COLUMN CONC CONCRETE CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS CJ CONTROL JOINT CG CORNER GUARD CORR CORRIDOR CS COUNTER SUNK CVR COVER DP DAMPPROOFING DL DEADLOAD DD DECK DRAIN DEMO DEMLITION DEPT DEPARTMENT DET DETAIL DIAG DIAGONAL DIA DIAMETER DIM DIMENSION DISP DISPENSER DR DOOR DN DOWN DS DOWNSPOUT DWG DRAWING DF DRINKING FOUNTAIN EA EACH E EAST ELEC ELECTRICAL EWC ELECTRICAL WATER COOLER EL ELEVATION ELEV ELEVATOR EMER EMERGENCY EWS EMERGENCY WASH STATION ENCL ENCLOSURE EQ EQUAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT EXH EXHAUST EXIST EXISTING ETR EXISTING TO REMAIN EXP EXPANSION EJ EXPANSION JOINT EC EXPOSED CONSTRUCTION EXT EXTERIOR EIFS EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SYSTEM FOC FACE OF CONCRETE FOF FACE OF FINISH FOM FACE OF MASONRY FOS FACE OF STUD FAS FASTEN, FASTENER FN FENCE FBD FIBERBOARD FGL FIBERGLASS FIN FINISH (ED) FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FFL FINISH FLOOR LINE FHS FIRE HOSE STATION FA FIRE ALARM FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FE FIRE EXTINQUISHER FRT FIRE-RETARDANT FPL FIREPLACE FP FIREPROOF FXT FIXTURE FLG FLASHING FLX FLEXIBLE FG FLOAT GLASS FD FLOOR DRAIN FLR FLOOR(ING) FLUR FLOURESCENT FL FLOW LINE FJT FLUSH JOINT FTG FOOTING FND FOUNDATION FR FRAME(D), (ING) FS FULL SIZE FUR FURRED, (ING) FUT FUTURE GA GAGE, GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GKT GASKET, (ED) GC GENERAL CONTRACT, (OR) GLB GLASS BLOCK GL GLASS, GLAZING GCMU GLAZED CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS GLAM GLAZED LAMINATE GB GRAB BAR GD GRADE, (ING) GRN GRANITE GRT GRATE, (ING) GVL GRAVEL ALL ABBREVIATIONS MAY NOT BE USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ABBREVIATIONS ABBREVIATION COMMENTS GRHS GREENHOUSE GT GROUT GRD GUARD GUT GUTTER GPDW GYPSUM DRYWALL GPL GYPSUM LATH GPPL GYPSUM PLASTER GPT GYPSUM TIME GPW GYPSUM WALLBOARD HC HANDICAP HRL HANDRAIL HBD HARDBOARD HDW HARDWARE HWD HARDWOOD HDR HEADER HTG HEATING HVAC HEATING/VENTILATION/AIR CONDITIONING HD HEAVY DUTY HT HEIGHT HPT HIGH POINT HCR HOLLOW CORE HORIZ HORIZONTAL HB HOSE BIBB INCAN INCANDESCENT INCIN INCINERATOR INCL INCLUDE, (ED), (ING) ID INSIDE DIAMETER INS INSULATE, (ED), (ING) INSC INSULATING CONCRETE IGL INSULATING GLASS INT INTERIOR INTM INTERMEDIATE INV INVERT JC JANITOR'S CLOSET JT JOINT JF JOINT FILLER J JOIST KPL KICKPLATE KIT KITCHEN KO KNOCKOUT LBL LABEL LAB LABORATORY LAD LADDER LB LAG BOLT LAM LAMINATE, (ED) LGL LAMINATED GLASS LAV LAVATORY LO LAYOUT LH LEFT HAND L LENGTH LT LIGHT LW LIGHTWEIGHT LMS LIMESTONE LTL LINTEL LL LIVE LOAD LOC LOCATE LLD LOOSE LAND LVR LOUVER LPT LOW POINT MB MACHINE BOLT MH MANHOLE MFR MANUFACTURE, (ER) MRB MARBLE MAS MASONRY MATL MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM MECH MECHNIC, (AL) MC MEDICINE CABINET MED MEDIUM MDO MEDIUM DENSITY OVERLAY MBR MEMBER MMB MEMBRANE MTL METAL M METER, (S) MW MICROWAVE MM MILLIMETER, (S) MIN MINIMUM MR MIRRO MGL MIRROR GLASS (FRAMED) MISC MISCELLANEIOUS MOD MODULAR MLD MOLDING, MOULDING MR MOP RECEPTOR MT MOUNT, (ED), (ING) MOV MOVABLE MULL MULLION NL NAILABLE NAT NATURAL NI NICKEL NR NOICE REDUCTION NOM NOMINAL N NORTH NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NTS NOT TO SCALE NO NUMBER OC ON CENTER, (S) OP OPAQUE OPG OPENING ORN ORNAMENTAL OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OA OVERALL OH OVERHEAD, OPPOSITE HAND PNT PAINT, (ED) PNL PANEL, (ING) PB PANIC BAR PTD PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER PTR PAPER TOWEL RECEPTOR PAR PARALLEL PRPT PARAPET PK PARKING PBD PARTICLE BOARD PTN PARTITION PV PAVE, (D), (ING) ABBREVIATIONS ABBREVIATION COMMENTS PVMT PAVEMENT PERF PERFORATE, (D) PRF PERFORATED PER PERIMETER PTR PLANTER PLTG PLANTING PLAS PLASTER PLA PLASTIC PLAM PLASTIC LAMINATE PL PLATE PG PLATE GLASS PWD PLYWOOD PT POINT PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PE PORCELAIN ENAMEL PCPL PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER PD POUND, (S) PCF POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT PLF POUNDS PER LINEAR FOOT PSI POUNDS PER SQARE FOOT PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PCC POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PFAB PREFABRICATE, (ED) PFN PREFINISHED PREM PREMOULDED PT PRESSURE TREATED PL PROPERTY LINE QT QUARRY TILE RBT RABBET, REBATE RAD RADIUS RFT RAFTER RL RAIL, (ING) REC RECESS, (ED) REF REFER, (ENCE) RFL REFLECT, (ED), (IVE), (OR) REFR REFRIGERATOR REG REGISTER REN REINFORCE, (ED), (ING) RECP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE REM REMOVE, (ABLE) REQ'D REQUIRED RES RESILIENT RET RETURN RA RETURN AIR RVS REVERSE (SIDE) REV REVISE, (S), (ED) RH RIGHT HAND ROW RIGHT OF WAY R RISER RVT RIVET R&S ROD AND SHELF RD ROOF DRAIN RFH ROOF HATCH RFG ROOFING RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING RS ROUGH SAWN RCP ROUND CONCRETE PIPE ROK ROWLOCK RB RUBBER BASE RBL RUBBER STONE RBT RUBBER TILE SSK RESERVE SINK SVYD RESERVE YARD SFGL SAFETY GLASS SCH SCHEDULE SCN SCREEN, (ED) SCUP SCUPPER SLNT SEALENT STG SEATING SEC SECTION SHTH SHEATH, (ING) SG SHEET GLASS SH SHELF, SHELVING SHNG SHINGLE, (S) SHU SHUTTER, (S) SYD SIDE YARD SDG SIDING SIM SIMILAR SKL SKYLIGHT SL SLEEVE SLO SLOPE SOL SOLDIER SC SOLID CORE SP SOUNDPROOF S SOUTH SPC SPACE, (R) SGL SPANDREL GLASS SPK SPEAKER SPL SPECIAL SPEC SPECIFICATION SPH SPLASH SQ SQUARE STGL STAINED GLASS SST STAINLESS STEEL STD STANDARD STA STATION ST STEEL STO STORAGE SF STOREFRONT SD STORM DRAIN STR STRUCTURAL STCO STUCCO SFLR SUBFLOOR SA SUPPLY AIR SUS SUSPENDED SYM SYMMETRY, (ETRICAL) SYN SYNTHETIC SYS SYSTEM TKBD TACKBOARD TEL TELEPHONE TV TELEVISION T TEMPERED GLASS TIG TEMPERED INSULATED GLASS TZ TERRAZO THK THICK, (NESS) THR THRESHOLD TBRL TO BE RELOCATED TOBR TO BE REMOVED ABBREVIATIONS ABBREVIATION COMMENTS TOR TO REMAIN TPD TOILET PAPER DISPENSER TPTN TOILET PARTITION TOL TOLERANCE T&G TONGUE AND GROOVE TSL TOP OF CONCRETE SLAB TC TOP OF CURB TJ TOP OF JOIST TP TOP OF PLATE TST TOP OF STEEL TSF TOP OF SUBFLOOR TW TOP OF WALL TPG TOPPING TB TOWEL BAR TR TRANSOM TS TUBE STEEL TRNB TURNBUCKLE TYP TYPICAL UC UNDERCUT UNF UNFINISHED UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE UR URINAL UTL UTILITY VJ V-JOINT VB VAPOR BARRIER VAR VARNISH VNR VENEER VERT VERTICAL ABBREVIATIONS ABBREVIATION COMMENTS VG VERTICAL GRAIN VN VINYL VB VINYL BASE VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VF VINYL FABRIC VT VINYL TILE VICP VITREOUS CLAY PIPE VICT VITREOUS CLAY TILE WSCT WAINSCOT WH WALL HUNG WC WATER CLOSET WHTR WATER HEATER WR WATER RESISTANT WP WATERPROOFING WS WATERSTOP WST WEATHERSTRIP, (PING) WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC W WEST WHS WHEEL STOP WID WIDTH, WIDE WIN WINDOW WM WIRE MESH WG WIRED GLASS WO WITHOUT WD WOOD WI WROUGHT IRON 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 25 of 81 ACCESSIBLITY SIGN TACTILE EXIT EXIT ROUTE EXIT EXIT ROUTE WOMEN'S ACCESSIBLE MEN'S ACCESSIBLE UNISEX ACCESSIBLE RESTROOMS ACCESSIBLE NON-ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM WOMEN MEN RESTROOMS RESTROOMS HANDICAPPEDACCESSIBLERESTROOM ONFIRST FLOOR RECESSED FOUNTAINSELEVATION PLAN - SINGLE NOTES: 1. LOCATED IN AN ALCOVE NOT LESS THAN 32" WIDE (SINGLE) AND 52" WIDE (DOUBLE) X 18" DEEP. DRINKING FOUNTAIN SHALL ACCOMMODATE ALCOVE DIMENSIONS. 2. 17" -19" DEPTH OF THE FOUNTAIN. 3. CLEAR AND UNOBSTRUCTED KNEE SPACE A MINIMUM OF 27" HIGH BY 8" DEEP UNDER THE FOUNTAIN. (MEASURED FROM FRONT EDGE.) 4. TOE CLEARANCE A MINIMUM OF 9" HIGH BY 17" DEEP. 5. LEVER OF PUSH BAR TYPE CONTROL IS LOCATED 5" MAXIMUM FROM FRONT EDGE. 6. BUBBLER OUTLET IS LOCATED 5" MAXIMUM FROM FRONT EDGE. 7. BUBBLER OUTLET IS LOCATED 36" MAXIMUM HEIGHT FROM FLOOR AT WHEELCHAIR FOUNTAIN. 8. STREAM FROM BUBBLER IS SUBSTANTIALLY PARALLEL TO FRONT EDGE 9. STREAM FROM BUBBLER IS A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH. 10. IN NEW CONSTRUCTION, WHERE ONLY ONE DRINKING FOUNTAIN AREA IS PROVIDED ON A FLOOR, THERE SHALL BE A DRINKING FOUNTAIN THAT IS ACCESSIBLE TO INDIVIDUALS WHO USE WHEELCHAIRS AND ONE ACCESSIBLE TO THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY BENDING OR STOOPING. NOTE: 1. WARNING FOR THE VISION IMPAIRED AT A PROJECTED DRINKING FOUNTAIN CAN BE PROVIDED BY EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING MEANS: THE SURFACE OF THE FLOOR OR GROUND AT THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN CAN BE OF A CONTRASTING COLOR WITH A TEXTURE THAT CONTRASTS IN RESILIENCY WITH THE ADJACENT FINISHED FLOOR MATERIAL, SO THAT IT CAN BE SENSED BY A CANE, WITH THE TEXTURE EXTENDING FROM THE WALL TO ONE FOOT BEYOND THE FRONT EDGE OF THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND ONE FOOT BEYOND EACH SIDE OF THE FOUNTAIN, OR INSTALL WING WALLS ON EACH SIDE OF THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN TO PROJECT OUT FROM THE MAIN WALL AT LEAST AS FAR AS THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND TO WITHIN 6" OF THE PATH OF TRAVEL FLOOR FINISH. THERE MUST BE 32" CLEAR BETWEEN THE WING WALLS FOR A SINGLE FIXTURE CONFIGURATION AND 52" CLEAR FOR A DOUBLE-FIXTURE CONFIGURATION. PLAN - DOUBLE 36 " M A X 9" M I N 2' - 3 " M I N 6" MAX8" MIN 17"-25" SPOUT SHALL BE WITHIN 3" OF FRONT AND SHALL DIRECT FLOW PARALLEL TO FRONT FLOW SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH DETAIL 10" MIN. BOTTOM RAIL OR KICK PLATE RUBBER BUMPER ON CHAIR WHERE INDICATED, A NARROW FRAME WITH A BEVELED TOP EDGE (30 DEGREE MAXIMUM BEVEL TO VERTICAL PLANE) INSTALLED AT THE BOTTOM OF A GLASS DOOR (WITH NO SIDE FRAMES) MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF PROVIDING THE REQUIRED 10-INCH UNINTERRUPTED SURFACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DOOR. NOTES: 1. MINIMUM 10" HIGH SMOOTH SURFACE AT DOOR BOTTOM, EITHER ATTACHED PANEL OR BOTTOM RAIL. 2. OPENABLE FROM INSIDE WITHOUT USE OF KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. 3. OPENABLE BY SINGLE EFFORT LEVER-TYPE DEVICE (NOT REQUIRING GRASPING) 4. HARDWARE MOUNTED 34" TO 48" AFF. 5. MAXIMUM 8.5 LBS EFFORT TO OPERATE EXTERIOR DOOR, 5 LBS FOR INTERIOR. A0-3 7 DOORS NOT TO SCALE A0-3 11 DRINKING FOUNTAINS NOT TO SCALE A0-3 12 ACCESSIBILITY REACH LIMITS NOT TO SCALE A0-3 13 PROTRUDING OBJECTS NOT TO SCALE A0-3 10 GRAB BAR SECTION NOT TO SCALE A0-3 6 DOOR CLEAR SPACE NOT TO SCALE A0-3 9 THRESHOLD/LEVEL CHANGES NOT TO SCALE A0-3 8 PERMANENT ROOM SIGNS NOT TO SCALE A0-3 5 ACCESSIBLITY SIGNS NOTES NOT TO SCALE NOTES: GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING SIGNAGE IN FIELD AND PROVIDE NEW AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM WITH ADA ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PROPORTION, COLOR, CONTRAST, RELIEF AND GRADE 2 BRAILLE REQUIREMENTS. SIGNAGE: AFFIX AN INTERNATIONAL ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL ON ALL ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES PER APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE. TACTILE EXIT SIGNAGE: A TACTILE EXIT SIGN WITH THE WORD "EXIT" SHALL IDENTIFY EACH GRADE LEVEL EXTERIOR EXIT DOOR. A TACTILE EXIT SIGN WITH THE WORDS "EXIT ROUTE" SHALL IDENTIFY EACH EXIT ACCESS DOOR FROM AN INTERIOR ROOM OR A VISUAL EXIT SIGN. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING SIGNAGE INSTALLATIONS AND PROVIDE NEW AS REQUIRED. CHARACTERS, SYMBOLS AND BACKGROUND SHALL HAVE A NON-GLARE FINISH. CHARACTERS AND SYMBOLS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THE BACKGROUND, EITHER LIGHT ON DARK BACKGROUND OR DARK ON LIGHT BACKGROUND. SIGNS TO INCLUDE BRAILLE AND CHARACTERS AS DEFINED BY CODE. MOUNTING LOCATION SHALL BE SO THAT A PERSON APPROACHING WITHIN 3" OF SIGN DOES NOT ENCOUNTER PROTRUDING OBJECTS OR WITHIN THE SWING OF A DOOR. SIGN LOCATIONS: REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, ACCESSIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONES, ACCESSIBLE ROOMS WHERE MULTIPLE SINGLE-USER TOILET OR BATHING ROOMS ARE CLUSTERED AT A SINGLE LOCATION, ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES WHERE NOT ALL ENTRANCES ARE ACCESSIBLE, ACCESSIBLE CHECK-OUT AISLES WHERE NOT ALL AISLES ARE ACCESSIBLE, FAMILY OR ASSISTED-USE TOILET AND BATHING ROOMS, ACCESSIBLE DRESSING/FITTING /LOCKER ROOMS WHERE NOT ALL SUCH ROOMS ARE ACCESSIBLE, ACCESSIBLE AREAS OF REFUGE, EXTERIOR AREAS FOR ASSISTED RESCUE. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE INDICATING THE ROUTE TO THE NEAREST LIKE ACCESSIBLE ELEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: INACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCES, INACCESSIBLE PUBLIC TOILETS AND BATHING FACILITIES, ELEVATORS NOT SERVING AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AT EACH SEPARATE-SEX TOILET AND BATHING ROOM INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE NEAREST FAMILY/ASSISTED USE TOILET OR BATHING ROOM, AT EXITS AND EXIT STAIRWAYS SERVING A REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACE BUT NOT PROVIDING AN APPROVED ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS, WHERE DRINKING FOUNTAINS FOR PERSONS USING WHEELCHAIRS AND DRINKING FOUNTAINS FOR STANDING PERSONS ARE NOT LOCATED ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER. INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY: STANDARD USED TO IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE FACILITIES. WHITE FIGURE ON BLUE BACKGROUND, COLOR #15090 ON FEDERAL STANDARD #595A. WHEN ENFORCING AGENCY DETERMINES, IF APPROPRIATE, SPECIAL DESIGNS AND COLORS MAY BE APPROVED. BRAILLE: USE CONTRASTED GRADE 2 BRAILLE. DOTS TO BE 0.1 INCHES ON CENTER IN EACH CELL. 0.2 INCHES SPACE BETWEEN CELLS. DOTS RAISED MINIMUM 0.025 INCHES ABOVE BACKGROUND. A0-3 4 TYPICAL ACCESSIBLITY SIGNS NOT TO SCALE A0-3 3 TYPICAL RESTROOM DOOR SIGNS NOT TO SCALE A0-3 2 TYPICAL RESTROOM ELEVATIONS NOT TO SCALE A0-3 1 TYPICAL RESTROOM PLAN NOT TO SCALE WHITE SYMBOLS AND LETTERS ON A BLUE BACKGROUND, TYPICAL CORRESPONDING, GRADE II BRAILLE LETTERING RAISED 1/32" UPPERCASE CHARACTERS RECESSED FOUNTAINSFORWARD REACH LIMITS SIDE REACH LIMIT OVER AN OBSTACLESIDE EACH LIMITS FORWARD REACH LIMIT OVER AN OBSTRUCTION PARALLEL APPROACH NOTES: 1. 'X' SHALL BE <= 25 INCHES, 'Z' SHALL BE >= 'X' 2. WHEN 'X' < 20 INCHES, THEN 'Y' SHALL BE 48 INCHES MAX. 3. WHEN 'X' IS 20 TO 25 INCHES, THEN 'Y' SHALL BE 44 INCHES MAXIMUM. MI N 1' - 3 " 48 " M A X 2' - 6 " 4' - 0" 4 8 " 1 5 " 2' - 6" 4' - 0 " 3' - 1 0 " M A X 34 " M A X 48" Z X X Z 4' - 0" FIG. (A)FIG. (B) 4" MAX 8 0 " 27 " M A X CANE RANGE CANE HITS POST OR PYLON BEFORE PERSON HITS OBJECT 1. TACTILE EXIT SIGN IS REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO ILLUMINATED SIGN ABOVE DOOR AT EXIT DOOR. 2. APPROVED SELF-LUMINOUS SIGN (0.06 FT. LAMBERTS MIN.). 3. CONTRACTED GRADE 2 BRAILLE SHALL BE USED. DOTS SHALL BE RAISED A MINIMUM OF 1/40" ABOVE THE BACKGROUND. 4. LETTERS AND NUMERALS SHALL BE RAISED 1/32", UPPERCASE SANS SERIF TYPE AND SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED WITH GRADE 2 BRAILLE. RAISED CHARACTERS SHALL BE AT LEAST 5/8" HIGH, BUT NO HIGHER THAN 2". 5. PERMANENT SIGNAGE TO BE INSTALLED ON THE WALL ADJACENT TO THE LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR. MOUNTING LOCATION MUST ALLOW A PERSON TO APPROACH WITHOUT ENCOUNTERING PROTRUDING OBJECTS OR STANDING WITHIN THE SWING PATH OF THE DOOR. 6. LETTERS AND NUMBERS ON SIGNS HAVE A WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT RATIO BETWEEN 50% AND 100% AND A STROKE WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT RATIO BETWEEN 10% AND 30%. 7. CHARACTERS CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND (LIGHT CHARACTERS ON A DARK BACKGROUND, OR DARK CHARACTERS ON A LIGHT BACKGROUND). 8. CHARACTERS AND BACKGROUND OF SIGNS SHALL BE EGGSHELL, MATTE OR OTHER NON-GLARE FINISH. ROOM SIGN 234 CORRESPONDING GRADE II BRAILLE REQUIRED @ PERMANENT DOOR IDENTIFICATION 60 " M A X TO F I N . FL R . NO T E 5 SE E LITERARY BRAILLE STANDARD DIMENSIONS: DOT DIAMETER ______________________________ .059 INCHES INTER-DOT SPACING __________________________.090 INCHES HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN CELLS ____.241 INCHES VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN CELLS ________.395 INCHES WALL MOUNTED SIGNAGE TO BE LOCATED ON LATCH SIDE OF DOOR SWING. 9" BA S E L I N E O F B R A I L L E 48 " M I N BA S E L I N E O F L E T T E R S 60 " M A X NOTES: 1. PROVIDE PRIVACY DOOR LOCK WHEN IT IS A PRIVATE TOILET OR FOR UNISEX USE. 2. PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED FOR ALL ACCESSORIES. 3. INSULATE EXPOSED PIPING OR PROVIDE PULLMAN COUNTER/FACE. 4. FAUCETS SHALL BE LEVER OPERATED, PUSH TYPE, OR ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED MECHANISMS. SELF-CLOSING VALVES SHALL REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST 10 SECONDS. 5. SEAL AROUND ALL RECESSED RESTROOM EQUIPMENT. 6. CAULK AROUND JOINT AT BOTTOM OF TOILET AND FLOOR. ELEVATION - C ELEVATION - D TRANSITION BETWEEN FLOOR FINISHES THRESHOLD NOTES: 1. 1/2" MAXIMUM TOTAL HEIGHT WITH 1/4" MAXIMUM VERTICAL CHANGE AT EDGE 2. 1:2 SLOPED BEVEL REQUIRED IF LEVEL CHANGE IS OVER 1/4" VERTICAL LEVEL CHANGE 3. 1/4" MAXIMUM VERTICAL LEVEL CHANGE 1/2" MAX. PILE HEIGHT COMPRESS CARPET 1/4" MAX. BELOW THRESHOLD FIN. FLOOR LEVEL THRESHOLD 1" - 2 " MA X 1/ 4 " . MA X 1/ 2 " . MA X 1/ 4 " . LEVEL CHANGES 5/8" GYP BD 1 1/4" DIA. GRAB BAR BLOCKING AS REQUIRED SERIES OF DOORS PLAN PLAN NOTES: 1. CLEAR SPACES MUST BE LEVEL TO PREVENT WHEELCHAIRS FROM ROLLING WHEN THE OCCUPANT RELEASES THE WHEEL GRIPS TO REACH FOR THE DOOR. 1/4" PER FOOT IS ALLOWED FOR DRAINAGE. 18" MIN. IF DOOR HAS BOTH A CLOSER AND A LATCH 60 " M I N 48 " M I N 48 " M I N 36" MIN 1' - 0" 48" MIN 54" PREFERRED 48 " M I N 60 " M I N 18" MIN DOOR WIDTH PLUS A0-3 2C A0-3 2A A0-3 2B TOILET SEAT DISPENSER WHERE OCCURS ROLL PAPER HOLDER WITHOUT STOPS 1 1/4" DIA. GRAB W/ PEENED FINISH & 250 LBS CAPACITY PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER MIRROR ELEVATION - A ELEVATION - B 17 " - 1 9 " 3' - 4 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 0"3' - 6" 3' - 4" 24" MIN 48 " M A X 3' - 6 " MIN 17". 8" MAX 6" MAX 9" M I N 2' - 3 " M I N 2' - 5 " M I N 2' - 1 0 " M A X 3' - 4 " M A X 40 " M A X 34 " M A X 1' - 3" MIN. CLR 5' - 0" 3' - 4 " 17 " - 1 9 " 48 " M A X 2' - 1 0 " 3' - 4 " 1' - 6 " 2' - 1 0 " 3' - 0"6" 1' - 6" CLR 2' - 6"2' - 0 " S T A N D A R D 1'- 5 " A C C E S S I B L E 36 " M A X WH E E L C H A I R 38 " - 43 " ST A N D I N G P E R S O N 27 " M I N 32" CLEAR FOR SINGLE 6" MIN 17"-25" 18" MIN24" MAX 5" MAX MA X 2' - 0 " MI N 4' - 0 " MIN 2' - 6" CLR 2' - 8" 1'-3"1'-3" MIN 4' - 0" CLR 4' - 4" MI N 4' - 0 " CLEAR FLOOR SPACE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE 2 1 REQUIRED CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED CLEAR SPACE 30" X 48" CLEAR AROUND LAVATORY 56" X 60" CLEAR AROUND TOILET LAVATORY 36" MIN GRAB BAR FLUSH CONTROL ON OPEN SIDE 42" MIN GRAB BAR TOILET TOILET PAPER DISPENSER 18" MIN VERTICAL GRAB BAR 5'-0" TURNING RADIUS 16" - 18"1' - 3" MIN CLR 5' - 0" MIN CLR 3' - 0" MI N C L R 6' - 4 " Y 24" MAX TO T O P O F G R I P P I N G S U R F A C E 33 " M I N - 3 6 " M A X 1 1/2" MIN 18" CLEAR 42" MAX 48 " M A X 18 " M I N 27 " M A X 80 " 18 " M I N SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 4 1 A M As indicated ACCESSIBLITY 2202.58 A0-3 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 26 of 81 E E GAS GASGAS OHE OHE SS SSSS ST STST W WW X X GM W EM SS SS CO CO ST X X X X X X X X X X W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW GAS GASGASGASGAS GAS GASGASGAS GAS GASGAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE OHE ST ST ST ST STSTST W ST ST OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE W WW W W W WW GAS GAS GASGAS GAS GASGAS GAS GAS E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E PROPERTY SITE LINE ELECTRIC LINE GAS LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE SANITARY LINE STORM LINE WATER LINE FENCE LINE LEGEND PROPERTY BUFFER PROPERTY SETBACK PHASE LEGEND EXISTING TO REMAIN EXISTING TO DEMO W 44TH AVE GR A Y S T R E E T 116.05' N89°54'08"E 02.209 02.206 13 9 . 9 8 ' N 0 0 ° 1 7 ' 3 2 " W L=23.51' R=15.00 STORM INLET FL GRATE=5373.63 INV.OUT(N)±18"RCP=5371.43 PA R K I N G 02.206 02.207 02.210 02.205 02.205 02.205 02.211 02.211 02.211 02.212 131.00' S89°54'08"W 02.208 02.213 15 4 . 9 3 ' N 0 0 ° 1 7 ' 3 2 " W 02.214 02.208 02.215 02.215 02.207 02.207 EXISTING CAR WASH BUILDING EXISTING VACUUM CANOPY 02.106 02.107 02.216 02.217 02.217 02.218 02.108 02.107 02.215 02.219 02.220 02.221 02.222 02.220 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 4 3 A M As indicated ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - DEMO 2202.58 A1-0 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 N KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 02.106 EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE TO REMAIN. 02.107 EXISTING UTILITY POLE TO REMAIN. 02.108 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN 02.205 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED. 02.206 EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED 02.207 EXISTING ROAD CURB TO BE REMOVED 02.208 EXISTING ROCK TO BE REMOVED 02.209 EXISTING SAND & OIL SEPARATOR TO BE REMOVED. 02.210 EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE TO BE REMOVED 02.211 EXISTING BRICK TRASH & VACUUMS STATION TO BE REMOVED 02.212 EXISTING FRAME SHED TO BE REMOVED 02.213 EXISTING MONUMENTAL SIGN TO BE REMOVED 02.214 EXISTING BRICK TERMINAL TO BE REMOVED 02.215 EXISTING POWERLINE TO BE REMOVED, RE: CIVIL 02.216 EXISTING CURB AND PARKING STALLS IN R.O.W. TO BE REMOVED, RE: CIVIL 02.217 EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED, RE: CIVIL 02.218 EXISTING BUSH TO BE REMOVED 02.219 EXISTING GAS LINE TO BE REMOVED, RE: CIVIL 02.220 EXISTING WATER LINE TO BE REMOVED, RE: CIVIL 02.221 EXISTING WATER METER TO BE REMOVED, RE: CIVIL 02.222 EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED BELOW GROUND, RE: CIVIL 1" = 10'-0"A1-0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - DEMO1 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 27 of 81 T E E GAS GASGAS OHE OHE SS SSSS ST STST W WW X X ST M COCO CO COCO TRANS X X X X X X X X X X W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW GAS GASGASGASGAS GAS GASGASGAS GAS GASGAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSS SS SS SS SSSSSSSS SS SS SS OHE OHE OHE OHE ST ST ST ST STSTST W ST ST OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE SS SSSSSSSS W WWWWW W GAS GASGASGASGAS VACUUM STANCHION PARKING SPACE CROSSWALK ADA RAMP ADA SYMBOL AUTO CASHIER ISLAND CANOPY PIPE BOLLARD WHEEL STOP TRASH ENCLOSURE SYMBOL LEGEND TRANSFORMER FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY MAN HOLE WATER METER UNDERGROUND TANK PROPERTY SITE LINE ELECTRIC LINE GAS LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE SANITARY LINE STORM LINE WATER LINE FENCE LINE LEGEND PROPERTY BUFFER PROPERTY SETBACK PROPOSED BUILDING 3539 SF 43.105 43.106 43.110 32.900 AU T O M A T I C W A S H B A Y AU T O M A T I C W A S H B A Y AU T O M A T I C W A S H B A Y AU T O M A T I C W A S H B A Y 32.911 32.800 03.150 08.100 36 ' - 2 " R.O.W. DEDICATION PR O P O S E D 8 ' - 0 " 46'-9"81'-4"1'-4" 03.130 43.109 3' - 8 " 2' - 7 " 8' - 0 " 2' - 7 " 32.21032.210 32.21032.210 03.140 03.140 32.700 02.106 A1-2 1 TYP. 13'-0" 56'-5" 54'-0" 43.125 43.125 W 44TH AVE N G R A Y S T 05.864 05.864 33.400 05.864 05.86432.900 R.O.W. DEDICATION PROPOSED 1'-6" 3'-7"17'-6"20'-0"5'-6" 14'-0" 46'-6" 5'-0" 11'-0" 24'-0" 16 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 8 " 43.106 43.106 43.126 43.127 43.127 33.220 05.801 33.90133.901 33.901 33.901 05.801 33.902 43.126 43.12743.12743.127 43.106 43.127 AMENITY BUFFER 2' - 0 " M I N BUFFER 2'-0" LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' - 0 1 / 2 5 6 " M I N . A1-2 8 1 A1-3________________________________________________________________ 2 A1-3________________________________________________________________ 19' - 0" TRADITIONAL OVERLAY (0-12' BUILD-TO) 50 ' - 0 " F R O N T S E T B A C K ( C - 1 ) TRADITIONAL OVERLAY (0-12' BUILD-TO) 30' - 0" STREET SIDE SETBACK (C-1) 10 ' - 0 " R E A R S E T B A C K ( C - 1 ) 5' - 0" SIDE SETBACK (C-1) ZONE 2' - 0 " U T I L I T Y SIDEWALK 8' - 0 " 01.118 88'-0" FRONTAGE 27'-6" 01.117 PB PB 01.117 L=23.49' R=15.00' Δ=89°44'08" 115.97' N89°58'27"E 13 9 . 5 4 ' S 0 0 ° 1 7 ' 2 5 " E 129.43' S89°52'45"W 14 6 . 6 9 ' N 0 0 ° 1 6 ' 5 1 " W L=23.49' R=15.00' Δ=89°44'08" 114.47' N89°58'27"E 8. 0 0 ' 1.50' 13 1 . 5 4 ' S 0 0 ° 1 7 ' 2 5 " E 15 4 . 6 9 ' N 0 0 ° 1 6 ' 5 1 " W 130.93' S89°52'45"W 1 1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 4 6 A M As indicated ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 2202.58 A1-1 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1" = 10'-0"A1-1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN1 N KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 01.117 STREET LIGHT PULL BOX, RE: LIGHTING DETAILS. 01.118 BENCH, RE: CIVIL 02.106 EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE TO REMAIN. 03.130 CONCRETE CURB, RE: CIVIL 03.140 CONCRETE APRON, RE: CIVIL 03.150 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 05.801 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN WALL, RE: SITE DETAILS. 05.864 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 12" ABOVE GRADE, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 08.100 EXTERIOR DOOR. 32.210 CONCRETE PAVING, RE: CIVIL. 32.700 MANHOLE, RE: CIVIL. 32.800 LANDSCAPE, RE: LANDSCAPE PLANS. 32.900 CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. 32.911 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL. 33.220 GAS METER LOCATION, RE: PLUMBING. 33.400 ELECTRICAL SERVICE ENTRANCE. 33.901 SAND/OIL DRAIN CLEANOUT 33.902 NEW WATER METER 43.105 TRASH ENCLOSURE, REFER TO SITE DETAILS. 43.106 PAY STATION, REFER TO EQUIPMENT CUT SHEETS. 43.109 UNDERGROUND SAND OIL INTERCEPTOR, RE: EQUIPMENT. 43.110 VACUUM STANCHION WITH ATTACHED PRODUCER. 43.125 EXTENTS OF SNOW MELT / HEATED CONCRETE. RE: SNOW MELT DRWINGS. 43.126 STOP SIGN, RE: CIVIL 43.127 POLE LIGHT, RE: ELECTRICAL 1 5/27/2024 CITY CMMTS 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 28 of 81 TRASH CONTAINER (BY OWNER)SL O P E 1 / 8 " PE R F T . 8"11' - 4"8" 8" 5' - 4 " 8" 8" 6' - 8 " 0" 6" DIAMETER X 4' HIGH CONCRETE-FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. (TYP. OF 5) 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE WITH #4S AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE APRON WITH #4S AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES TO BE 1 1/2" STEEL DECKING WELDED TO 1 3/4" X 1 3/4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. PAINT EPT-1. 1' - 6"1' - 6"4' - 2"4' - 2" 3"3" 2"4" 4" X 4" X 1/4" STEEL POST EMBEDDED 2'-0" MIN. IN TO CONCRETE FOOTING. WELD PLATE ON TOP, MAKE WATER-TIGHT AND PAINT EPT-1. A1-2 7 1' - 4"10' - 0"1' - 4" 12' - 8" 4"2"9' - 0" APPLIED STONE-LOOK FINISH OVER CMU WALL TO MATCH BUILDING 1 1 APPLIED STONE LOOK FINISH TO MATCH BUILDING OVER CMU WALL SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 6' - 8 " 4" 7' - 0 " 6" DIAMETER X 4' HIGH CONCRETE-FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. (TYP. OF 5) TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES TO BE 1 1/2" STEEL DECKING WELDED TO 1 3/4" X 1 3/4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT MASONRY 4" X 4" X 1/4" STEEL POST EMBEDDED 2'-0" MIN. IN TO CONCRETE FOOTING. WELD PLATE ON TOP, MAKE WATER-TIGHT AND PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT MASONRY4" 6' - 2 " 6' - 6 " 12' - 8" NOTE: PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL 1/2" DIA x 24" CANE BOLT 1 1/4" GATE PULLS HASP LOCK 7' - 0 " APPLIED STONE LOOK FINISH TO MATCH BUILDING OVER CMU WALL SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 6' - 8 " 4" 10' - 8" 5 A1-2 7' - 0 " APPLIED STONE LOOK FINISH TO MATCH BUILDING OVER CMU WALL SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES5 A1-2 6' - 8 " 4" 12' - 8" HORIZONTAL REINFORCING 8" CMU WITH STEEL REINFORCING AND GROUT NOTE: GROUT SOLID ALL MASONRY COURSES BELOW GRADE APPLY 2 COATS OF WATERPROOFING COATING TO ALL EXPOSED CMU AND CMU GROUT JOINTS 4X10X16 NOM. SOLID CMU WALL CAP WITH CHAMFERED EDGES 8" KNOCK-OUT, REINFORCED BOND BEAM 4" CONCRETE FOUNDATION & REINFORCING, RE: STRUCTURAL 7' - 0 " CONCRETE SLAB. RE: CIVIL WELD HINGE TO POST AND GATE EMBED STEEL POST IN CONCRETE FOUNDATION 2' DEPTH MIN. 2"4" 3 5 / 8 " VERTICAL REINFORCING PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS GROUT CELLS SOLID GATE ASSEMBLY AS IDENTIFIED ALIGN AL I G N 6" DIAMETER CONCRETE- FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. 6" MIN -8" MAX CLEAR BETWEEN BOLLARD AND FACE OF WALL FINISH 7' - 6 " 2' - 6 " 1' - 0 " 6" DIA. PAINTED STEEL PIPE x 4'-0" FILL w/ CONCRETE AND MOUND TOP 2 -10" #5 BARS WELDED TO SIDE OF PIPE 16" DIA x 3'-6" DEEP CONCRETE BASE COAT ALL EXPOSED STEEL w/ ASPHALTIC PAINT PRIOR TO SETTING IN CONCRETE 6" MIN -8" MAX CLEAR BETWEEN BOLLARD AND FACE OF WALL FINISH, WHERE BOLLARD IS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO WALL. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPE. TYPICAL 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED CROSS STRIPES AT 24" O.C. UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL. PAINT WITH 4" WIDE STRIPING 11' - 0" 5' - 0" 13'-0" 19 ' - 6 " BLUE FIELD WHITE PAINTED 8" STRIPING 6'-8" 6'- 8 " WHITE PAINTED INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY RESERVED PARKING ACCESSIBLE VAN FINISH GRADE CONCRETE FOOTING WHITE LETTERING WHITE BORDER, SYMBOL AND LETTERING BLUE FIELD COLOR NO. 15090 IN FEDERAL STANDARD 599B REFLECTORIZED SIGN CONSTRUCTED OF PORCELAIN STEEL WITH BEADED TEXT OR EQUAL 2" DIA GALVANIZED PIPE SET IN CONCRETE 18" BELOW GRADE BLUE FIELD COLOR NO. 15090 IN FEDERAL STANDARD 599B 6 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6 " 12" CLEARANCE _'-_" PAYSTATION KIOSK BEHIND, BY OWNER CLEARANCE BAR POST, PAINT WHITE CLEARANCE SIGN, BY OWNER. HANGING CHAIN TOP RAIL, PAINT WHITE LIGHT FIXTURE AND LIGHT POLE RAISED CONCRETE ISLAND RE : E L E C T R I C A L 3' - 0 " 10 8 " CONCRETE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION, RE: STRUCTURAL LIGHTPOLE PAYSTATION KIOSK, BY OWNER 10 8 " CLEARANCE SIGN PLACED INTO CONCRETE WITH BASE AT FINISHED FLOOR 3' - 0 " 6" AMP NOTE: COORDINATE SET BOLTS AND CONDUITS WITH CARWASH EQUIPMENT VENDOR & OWNER BEFORE ISLAND INFILL CONCRETE IS POURED. ** PAYSTATION MOUNTING SURFACE MUST BE FLAT AND LEVEL PAYSTATION KIOSK, BY OWNER 36 " CLEARANCE SIGN 24"18" LIGHT FIXTURE ANCHOR PLATE 18 " CONCRETE BASE, RE: STRUCTURAL AMP BASE 6" 2" 5' - 6" CENTERLINE OF BAY AMP BASE 169" 151" 7 7 " SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 4 8 A M As indicated SITE DETAILS 2202.58 A1-2 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1/4" = 1'-0"A1-2 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN - CMU1 1/4" = 1'-0"A1-2 TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION - CMU2 1/4" = 1'-0"A1-2 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION - CMU3 1/4" = 1'-0"A1-2 TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION - CMU4 3/8" = 1'-0"A1-2 ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION5 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-2 TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE DETAIL - CMU6 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-2 PIPE BOLLARD7 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL - WIDE12 1/4" = 1'-0"A1-2 ACCESSABLE PARKING SYMBOL SIGN13 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN14 1 5/27/2024 CITY CMMTS 3/8" = 1'-0"A1-2 DTL-AUTOPAY ELEVATION-APPROACH9 3/8" = 1'-0"A1-2 DTL-AUTOPAY ELEVATION-FRONT10 3/8" = 1'-0"A1-2 DTL-AUTOPAY PLAN8 3/8" = 1'-0"A1-2 DTL-AUTOPAY POSITION11 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 29 of 81 EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ 27'-6" 8' - 0 " 3 A1-3 CITYSCAPES COVRIT SCREEN WALL SYSTEM, SILVER SATIN FINISH CITYSCAPES NATURESCREEN SCREEN INFILL PANELS, 4" SQUARE WIRE MESH, SILVER SATIN FINISH 4" CAR WASH BUILDING, RE: SITE PLAN EQ EQ EQ EQ 19'-4" 3 A1-3 CAR WASH BUILDING, RE: SITE PLAN 4" 8'- 0 " CITYSCAPES COVRIT SCREEN WALL SYSTEM, SILVER SATIN FINISH CITYSCAPES NATURESCREEN SCREEN INFILL PANELS, 4" SQUARE WIRE MESH, SILVER SATIN FINISH 8' - 2 " 8' - 0 " SQUARE EXTRUDED ALUMINUM POST, CITYSCAPES COVRIT SCREEN WALL SYSTEM. BASE PLATE AND FASTENERS PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMEND. CONCRETE FOUNDATION. RE: STRUCTURAL. SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 4 9 A M 3/8" = 1'-0" SITE DETAILS 2202.58 A1-3 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 3/8" = 1'-0"A1-3 SCREEN WALL - 27'6" LENGTH - FRONT1 3/8" = 1'-0"A1-3 SCREEN WALL - 19'4" LENGTH - FRONT2 3/8" = 1'-0"A1-3 SCREEN WALL - SECTION3 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 30 of 81 2 A3-2________________________________________________________________ 1 D 2 A3-1________________________________________________________________ 1 A3-1 ________________________________________________________________ 1 A4-1 1 A4-1 2 A4-1 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 1 A4-2 2 A4-2 2 A4-2 15' - 4"15' - 4"15' - 4"15' - 4" C B A 2 3 4 5 6 16' - 0" 4' - 0 " 9' - 4 " 40 ' - 8 " 4' - 0 " 52 ' - 8 " AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 RESTROOM 104 54 ' - 0 " 3' - 4"10' - 0"6' - 0"10' - 0"2' - 8"17' - 4"2' - 8"10' - 0"6' - 0"10' - 0"3' - 4" 16' - 0"16' - 0"17' - 4"16' - 0"16' - 0" 3' - 4"10' - 0"6' - 0"10' - 0"2' - 8"8' - 4"4' - 4"4' - 8"2' - 8"10' - 0"6' - 0"10' - 0"3' - 4" 32' - 0"17' - 4"32' - 0" 81' - 4" 22.11022.110 22.110 22.110 101A 102A 102B101B 106A105A 105B 106B 103A 104 SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SL O P E TO D R A I N SL O P E TO D R A I N -3" TYP. SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SL O P E TO D R A I N SL O P E TO D R A I N -3" TYP. SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SL O P E TO D R A I N SL O P E TO D R A I N -3" TYP. SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SL O P E TO D R A I N SL O P E TO D R A I N -3" TYP. SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN -2" TYP. 01.104 B 5' - 4 " 14 ' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 5' - 4 " B 33.220 26.210 05.813 43.114 05.86432.900 22.530 A7-1 122.110 05.864 05.864 05.864 22.120 A ABOVE 22.830 32.900 43.114 01.101 22.101 1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 5 2 A M 1/4" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN 2202.58 A2-1 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 N KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 01.101 LINE OF EQUIPMENT PLATFORM ABOVE. 01.104 DASHED LINE INDICATES EXTENTS OF THERMAL ENVELOPE, RE: COMCHECK ENVELOPE ANALYSIS. 05.813 SHIPS LADDER WITH INTEGRAL RAILING @ 36" AFF. 05.864 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 12" ABOVE GRADE, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 22.101 UNDERGROUND LIFT STATION FOR PERIMETER DRAIN, DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS. RE: GEOTECH REPORT. 22.110 SINGLE FLOOR DRAIN, SLOPE FLOOR TO DRAIN, RE: PLUMBING. 22.120 PREFABRICATED TRENCH DRAIN, SLOPE FLOOR TO DRAIN, RE: PLUMBING. 22.530 BACK FLOW PREVENTION VALVE, RE:PLUMBING 22.830 INSTANT HOT WATER DEVICE, RE: PLUMBING. 26.210 POWER DISTRIBUTION PANEL, RE: ELECTRICAL. 32.900 CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. 33.220 GAS METER LOCATION, RE: PLUMBING. 43.114 UNDERGROUND WATER STORAGE TANK WITH MAN HOLES, RE: EQUIPMENT. 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN1 1 5/27/2024 CITY CMMTS 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 31 of 81 1 D C B A 2 3 4 5 6 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 118 117 112 112 128 112 128 101 128 128 101 101 116 119 122 121 121 121 121 120 112 101 112 112 112 112 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 RESTROOM 104 22.101 EQUIPMENT NOTES 1. CAR WASH EQUIPMENT SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. 2. SEE CW, M, P AND E DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT INFORMATION. 3. VERIFY/COORDINATE ALL EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS WITH CAR WASH EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER. 4. GC IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING POWER, WATER, AND GAS TO ALL EQUIPMENT AS WELL AS ALL CONDUIT AND PLUMBING LINES REQUIRED FOR EQUIPMENT HOOK-UP. 5. PROVIDE SUMP PIT IN EQUIPMENT ROOM FROM WEEP RECOVERY SYSTEM , VERIFY LOCATION WITH EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER. 6. COORDINATE WITH EQUIPMENT VENDOR FOR ALL MASONRY ROUGH OPENING REQUIREMENTS. 7. RECLAIM SYSTEM SHOWN IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE, REFER TO RECLAIM DRAWINGS SPECIFIC TO PROJECT SITE FOR ACTUAL TANK SIZES AND PIPING. 8. ALL LOOSE FURNISHINGS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY OWNER AND ARE SHOWN HERE FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES ONLY. CAR WASH EQUIPMENT VENDOR: CONTACT: PHONE #: EMAIL: BASIS OF DESIGN DATE: COMTEC RICK NUSS (303)233-7667 RICKNCOMTEC@GMAIL.COM 04/18/2022 VACUUM EQUIPMENT VENDOR: CONTACT: PHONE #: EMAIL: BASIS OF DESIGN DATE: SNOW MELT DESIGN: CONTACT: PHONE #: EMAIL: BASIS OF DESIGN DATE: CAR WASH BOILERS CHRIS ROJAS (330)623-0036 CHRIS@CARWASHBOILERS.COM - SIGNAGE /POS EQUIPMENT VENDOR: CONTACT: PHONE #: EMAIL: BASIS OF DESIGN DATE: COMTEC RICK NUSS (303)233-7667 RICKNCOMTEC@GMAIL.COM 04/18/2022 COMTEC RICK NUSS (303)233-7667 RICKNCOMTEC@GMAIL.COM 04/18/2022 EQUIPMENT VENDORS SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 5 3 A M As indicated EQUIPMENT PLAN 2202.58 A2-2 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-2 EQUIPMENT PLAN1 N SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE Equipment ID Description 101 PUMP STATION 102 PUMP STATION 103 AIR COMPRESSOR 104 TRANSFORMER 105 DISCONNECT 106 SPOT FREE 107 FILTER 108 RO TANK 112 KARCHER CABINET 116 SOFTENER 117 SALT TANK 118 BOOSTER PUMP 119 BLADDER TANK 120 WATER HEATER 121 DRAIN 122 ELECTRICAL PANEL 123 UNIT HEATER 125 EXACTA HUB 126 BUFFER TANK 128 SIGNAL BOX 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 32 of 81 D 1 A4-1 2 A4-1 2 A4-2 A 3 4 16' - 0" 05.833 06.90106.901 OPEN TO BELOW PLYWOOD LID AT RESTROOM, PAINT RA2RA1 A DN A 07.412 05.813 43.116 34 ' - 9 " 7'-6"8'-0"1'-10" 13 ' - 4 " 12 ' - 0 " 2' - 8 " 3' - 4 " 2' - 8 " 12 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 13 ' - 4 " 12 ' - 0 " 2' - 8 " 3' - 4 " 2' - 8 " 12 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 54 ' - 0 " 05.868 05.868 17'-4" F1 F1 F1 43.103 C CC C 13 A6-1 43.103 23.500 D A 3 4 102 103 108 108 106 107 104 105 105 104 104 105 105 104 103 DN OPEN TO BELOW A A 123 23.500 D A 3 4 11 ' - 5 " 12 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 5 " 12 ' - 0 " F1 F1 F1 F1 09.44009.440 05.868 05.868 05.212 05.212 05.283 05.240 43.10343.103 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 5 6 A M 1/4" = 1'-0" EQUIPMENT PLATFORM 2202.58 A2-3 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 N KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 05.212 STEEL TUBE COLUMN FOR TOWER SCREEN WALL FRAMING, RE: STRUCTURAL, EPT-1 05.240 STEEL WIDE FLANGE BEAM, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.283 LIGHT GAUGE STEEL JOISTS, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.813 SHIPS LADDER WITH INTEGRAL RAILING @ 36" AFF. 05.833 PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANT FLOOR MOUNTED GUARDRAIL @ 42" AFF. STYLE AND COLOR SUBJECT TO OWNERS APPROVAL. 05.868 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 18" ABOVE LOWER ROOF, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 06.901 PLYWOOD PLATFORM, RE: STRUCTURAL 07.412 EXTERIOR INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM, EIFS-2 09.440 EXPOSED STRUCTURE 23.500 HEATER UNIT, RE: MECHANICAL 43.103 INTAKE/EXHAUST ROOF PENETRATION, RE: MEP & EQUIPMENT. 43.116 HOSE TROUGH ATTACHED TO ROOF, RE: EQUIPMENT. GC TO COORDINATE KNOCKOUT THROUGH TO EQUIPMENT ROOM WITH COMTEC AFTER EQUIPMENT DELIVERY. 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-3 EQUIPMENT PLATFORM - FLOOR PLAN1 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-3 EQUIPMENT PLATFORM - EQUIPMENT PLAN2 N1/4" = 1'-0"A2-3 EQUIPMENT PLATFORM - RCP3 N SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE Equipment ID Description 101 PUMP STATION 102 PUMP STATION 103 AIR COMPRESSOR 104 TRANSFORMER 105 DISCONNECT 106 SPOT FREE 107 FILTER 108 RO TANK 112 KARCHER CABINET 116 SOFTENER 117 SALT TANK 118 BOOSTER PUMP 119 BLADDER TANK 120 WATER HEATER 121 DRAIN 122 ELECTRICAL PANEL 123 UNIT HEATER 125 EXACTA HUB 126 BUFFER TANK 128 SIGNAL BOX 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 33 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 5 8 A M EQUIPMENT NOTES 2202.58 A2-4 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 34 of 81 1 D C B A 2 3 4 5 6 4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0" 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 5' - 4 " 15 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 5' - 4 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " CC BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB CC BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB 10' - 6"6' - 10" 17' - 4" BB BB BB AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 OPEN TO ABOVE RESTROOM 104 32'-0"3'-0" 3' - 0 " 40 ' - 8 " 3' - 0 " 32'-0"3'-0" 3'-0"32'-0" 3' - 0 " 40 ' - 8 " 3' - 0 " 3'-0"32'-0" 10 ' - 0 " EQ EQ 10 ' - 0 " F4 F4 10 ' - 0 " EQ EQ 10 ' - 0 " F4 F4 10 ' - 0 " EQ EQ 10 ' - 0 " F4 F4 10 ' - 0 " EQ EQ 10 ' - 0 " F4 F4 EQ 6'-0"EQ EQ 12 ' - 0 " EQ F2 F2 F2 F1 F1 F1 EQ EQ EQ EQ F A.F.F. CA-2 8' - 0" F3 F2 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 5' - 4 " 15 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 5' - 4 " 4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0" 4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0" 05.861 05.864 05.861 05.864 F 1' - 6"1' - 6"1' - 6"1' - 6" 43.10343.103 X2 X2 5/8" GWB CEILING; 3 5/8" OR 6" METAL STUD FRAMING AT 16"o.c. OR SUSPENDED AS SPECIFIED CEILING TYPES CA-2 LINEAR LIGHT FIXTURE RECESSED CAN LIGHT FIXTURE EXHAUST FANF EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE EXTERIOR SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURE CEILING LEGEND SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 0 1 A M As indicated REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 2202.58 A2-5 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-5 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN1 LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION BB 6" RECESSED LED CAN LIGHT - EXTERIOR CC WALL PACK LIGHT FIXTURE F1 8-FT LED STRIPLIGHT - WALL MOUNTED F2 6-FT LED STRIPLIGHT F3 6" RECESSED LED CAN LIGHT F4 8-FT LED STRIPLIGHT X2 EXTERIOR EMERGENCY LIGHT KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 05.861 PREFINISHED METAL GUTTERS TO MATCH METAL ROOF. 05.864 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 12" ABOVE GRADE, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 43.103 INTAKE/EXHAUST ROOF PENETRATION, RE: MEP & EQUIPMENT. N 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 35 of 81 1 D 1 A4-1 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 2 A4-2 C B A 2 3 4 5 6 10.122 05.410 1" / 1 ' - 0 " 1/2" / 1'-0" 1/2" / 1'-0" 1" / 1 ' - 0 " 43.11643.116 05.61105.611 05.61105.611 05.61105.611 05.872 05.410 05.861 05.872 05.410 05.864 08.14008.140 5'-4" 9'- 1 1 " 5'-4" 05.864 05.864 05.86405.861 05.868 05.868 05.861 A6-1 12 A6-1 12 4 A6-1 4 A6-1 A6-2 15 A6-2 15 23.220 23.220 05.866 05.866 23.501 23.501 43.10343.103 1 1 ROOF NOTES 1. ALL ROOF SLOPES ARE CREATED BY SLOPING THE ROOF STRUCTURE. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ELEVATIONS OF THE HIGH AND LOW POINTS. 2. REFERENCE ALL ROOF ASSEMBLIES AND WALL SECTIONS FOR ROOFING DETAILS. 3. THE 1 1/2" DESIGNATION INDICATED APPROXIMATE VERTICAL ELEVATION ABOVE STRUCTURAL ROOF DECK. 4. REFER TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL PENETRATIONS NOT INDICATED ON THE ROOF PLAN. 5. ARROWS ON THE PLAN INDICATE DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS OF BUILDING AND DRAIN LOCATIONS AND OTHER PENETRATIONS. 6. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FRAMING AROUND ROOF PENETRATIONS. 7. PAINT ALL ROOF MOUNTED EXPOSED MECHANICAL HOODS AND NEW EQUIPMENT, U.N.O. 8. FLASH ALL DRAINS, CURBS, VENTS AND STACKS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS IF DETAIL NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. 9. PROVIDE ONE (1) LAYER 30# BUILDING FELT SEPARATION BETWEEN ANY TREATED WOOD BLOCKING AND STEEL OR ALUMINUM BUILDING COMPONENTS. 10. V.P. = VENT PIPE 11. R.V. = ROOF VENT SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 0 2 A M As indicated ROOF PLAN 2202.58 A2-6 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-6 ROOF PLAN1 KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 05.410 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING OVER PARAPET WALL 05.611 PBR METAL PANEL ROOFING, MR-1 05.861 PREFINISHED METAL GUTTERS TO MATCH METAL ROOF. 05.864 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 12" ABOVE GRADE, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 05.866 THROUGH WALL SCUPPER WITHOUT DOWNSPOUT. 05.868 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 18" ABOVE LOWER ROOF, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 05.872 AWNING, WITH METAL PANEL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 08.140 WALL HATCH TO ROOF. 10.122 BUILDING SIGNAGE, UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT. 23.220 THROUGH ROOF PENETRATION, RE: MECHANICAL & PLUMBING. 23.501 ROOF MOUNTED PASSIVE TURBINE VENTILATION, RE: MECHANICAL 43.103 INTAKE/EXHAUST ROOF PENETRATION, RE: MEP & EQUIPMENT. 43.116 HOSE TROUGH ATTACHED TO ROOF, RE: EQUIPMENT. GC TO COORDINATE KNOCKOUT THROUGH TO EQUIPMENT ROOM WITH COMTEC AFTER EQUIPMENT DELIVERY. N 1 5/27/2024 CITY CMMTS 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 36 of 81 FLOOR 0" PLATFORM 9' - 6" 11 A4-2 2 A4-2 23456 PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 106B 105B A 102B 101B 26.421 33.220 05.872 09.610 05.315 09.273 05.311 10 ' - 0 " 10.122 10.122 05.872 05.410 09.610 05.315 09.273 05.410 01.103 01.103 4' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 05.410 05.410 09.620 09.610 8' - 0" FLOOR 0" PLATFORM 9' - 6" D ROOF 18' - 0" 1 A4-1 2 A4-1C B A PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 4' - 0 " B B 8' - 8 " 8' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 10.122 05.866 05.866 10.122 26.421 05.872 26.421 05.311 09.620 09.273 C C 33.400 05.315 09.610 01.103 01.103 33.220 05.410 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 0 6 A M 1/4" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2202.58 A3-1 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-1 NORTH ELEVATION2 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-1 EAST ELEVATION1 KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 01.103 DASHED LINE INDICATES LOCATION OF FLAT ROOF BEYOND PARAPET. 05.311 VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-1 05.315 HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 05.410 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING OVER PARAPET WALL 05.866 THROUGH WALL SCUPPER WITHOUT DOWNSPOUT. 05.872 AWNING, WITH METAL PANEL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 09.273 PANELIZED STONE-LOOK INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM WITH INTEGRAL SILL, STN-1. 09.610 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 09.620 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-2 10.122 BUILDING SIGNAGE, UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT. 26.421 EXTERIOR WALL PACK WITH 90 DEGREE CUTOFF, RE: ELECTRICAL. 33.220 GAS METER LOCATION, RE: PLUMBING. 33.400 ELECTRICAL SERVICE ENTRANCE. EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION MFR MODEL/COLOR REMARKS MISC SF-1 STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY KAWNEER 451T, TERRA COTTA WITH POLYCARBONATE GLAZING SF-2 VENEER STOREFRONT WITH SPANDREL GLAZING KAWNEER & VIRACON 450 (2.25" DEPTH & 2" SIGHTLINE) / TERRA COTTA, V957 "SUBDUED GRAY" W/ SPANDREL PANEL ROOF MR-1 METAL ROOF PANEL METAL SALES PBR PANEL AWNINGS: TERRA COTTA FINISH WALL EPT-1 PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS TO MATCH MR-1 TERRA COTTA MP-1 ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL SALES T-10 A, METALLIC SILVER VERTICAL ORIENTATION MP-2 ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL SALES TLC-1, REGAL BLUE HORIZONTAL ORIENTATION MTL-1 METAL SCREEN WALL H&H METALS CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAME AND MESH SCREEN PANELS ST-1 PANELIZED STUCCO FINISH URESTONE STUCCO CLAD, HALF PATTERN, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7066 GRAY MATTERS ST-2 PANELIZED STUCCO FINISH URESTONE STUCCO CLAD, HALF PATTERN, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6524 COMMODORE STN-1 URESTONE LEDGESTONE URESTONE LEDGESTONE WAINSCOT, CASCADE CANYON FINISH WAINSCOT AT MAIN BODY 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 37 of 81 FLOOR 0" D1 A4-1 2 A4-1 A PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 8' - 8 " 8' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 26.421 10.122 26.421 05.872 05.311 09.610 05.315 09.273 32.900 01.103 C C 01.103 05.410 FLOOR 0" PLATFORM 9' - 6" 1 1 A4-2 2 A4-223 4 5 6 PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 17' - 4" 05.864 05.311 26.421 05.872 10.122 2'-0" 1' - 0 " 2'-0" 1' - 0 " 13'-10" 13'-10" 101A 102A A 103A 105A 106A 10 ' - 0 " 8'- 8 " 8'- 0 " 4' - 0 " 32.900 09.610 05.315 01.103 05.866 01.103 09.273 09.273 05.315 09.610 05.410 05.866 32.900 05.410 05.410 05.410 05.410 09.620 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 1 0 A M 1/4" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2202.58 A3-2 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-2 WEST ELEVATION1 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-2 SOUTH ELEVATION2 KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 01.103 DASHED LINE INDICATES LOCATION OF FLAT ROOF BEYOND PARAPET. 05.311 VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-1 05.315 HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 05.410 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING OVER PARAPET WALL 05.864 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 12" ABOVE GRADE, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 05.866 THROUGH WALL SCUPPER WITHOUT DOWNSPOUT. 05.872 AWNING, WITH METAL PANEL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 09.273 PANELIZED STONE-LOOK INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM WITH INTEGRAL SILL, STN-1. 09.610 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 09.620 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-2 10.122 BUILDING SIGNAGE, UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT. 26.421 EXTERIOR WALL PACK WITH 90 DEGREE CUTOFF, RE: ELECTRICAL. 32.900 CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD. EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION MFR MODEL/COLOR REMARKS MISC SF-1 STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY KAWNEER 451T, TERRA COTTA WITH POLYCARBONATE GLAZING SF-2 VENEER STOREFRONT WITH SPANDREL GLAZING KAWNEER & VIRACON 450 (2.25" DEPTH & 2" SIGHTLINE) / TERRA COTTA, V957 "SUBDUED GRAY" W/ SPANDREL PANEL ROOF MR-1 METAL ROOF PANEL METAL SALES PBR PANEL AWNINGS: TERRA COTTA FINISH WALL EPT-1 PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS TO MATCH MR-1 TERRA COTTA MP-1 ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL SALES T-10 A, METALLIC SILVER VERTICAL ORIENTATION MP-2 ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL SALES TLC-1, REGAL BLUE HORIZONTAL ORIENTATION MTL-1 METAL SCREEN WALL H&H METALS CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAME AND MESH SCREEN PANELS ST-1 PANELIZED STUCCO FINISH URESTONE STUCCO CLAD, HALF PATTERN, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7066 GRAY MATTERS ST-2 PANELIZED STUCCO FINISH URESTONE STUCCO CLAD, HALF PATTERN, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6524 COMMODORE STN-1 URESTONE LEDGESTONE URESTONE LEDGESTONE WAINSCOT, CASCADE CANYON FINISH WAINSCOT AT MAIN BODY 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 38 of 81 FLOOR 0" PLATFORM 9' - 6" 1 1 A4-2 2 A4-2 A5-1 3 2 3 4 5 6 PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 03.110 05.611 05.866 05.868 05.861 05.270 43.114 05.813 05.833 43.116 05.410 10.122 05.872 09.610 03.181 05.315 09.273 05.611 03.110 09.273 05.315 09.610 05.872 05.410 09.620 03.181 03.181 1/2" 1'-0" 03.170 A5-1 5 A5-1 1 Sim A5-1 1 Sim 03.181 A5-1 2 Sim A5-1 2 Sim 07.350 FLOOR 0" PLATFORM 9' - 6" 1 1 A4-2 2 A4-2 A5-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" A 101B 102B 105B 106B AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 05.872 05.410 03.110 05.611 05.410 05.611 06.901 22.120 43.114 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 1/2" 1'-0" 05.270 03.181 09.273 05.315 09.610 A5-1 4 A5-1 1 Sim A5-1 3 Sim 05.410 05.872 09.610 05.315 09.273 03.181 08.212 A5-1 2 A5-1 2 Sim 05.240 05.283 B.O. TOWER ROOF FRAMING - HIGH 25' - 0" B.O. TOWER ROOF FRAMING - LOW 24' - 4" 07.350 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 1 3 A M 1/4" = 1'-0" BUILDING SECTIONS 2202.58 A4-1 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 03.110 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE, RE: STRUCTURAL. 03.170 CONCRETE FOUNDATION, RE: STRUCTURAL. 03.181 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.240 STEEL WIDE FLANGE BEAM, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.270 METAL DECKING, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.283 LIGHT GAUGE STEEL JOISTS, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.315 HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 05.410 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING OVER PARAPET WALL 05.611 PBR METAL PANEL ROOFING, MR-1 05.813 SHIPS LADDER WITH INTEGRAL RAILING @ 36" AFF. 05.833 PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANT FLOOR MOUNTED GUARDRAIL @ 42" AFF. STYLE AND COLOR SUBJECT TO OWNERS APPROVAL. 05.861 PREFINISHED METAL GUTTERS TO MATCH METAL ROOF. 05.866 THROUGH WALL SCUPPER WITHOUT DOWNSPOUT. 05.868 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 18" ABOVE LOWER ROOF, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 05.872 AWNING, WITH METAL PANEL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 06.901 PLYWOOD PLATFORM, RE: STRUCTURAL 07.350 SPRAY-ON FOAM INSULATION WITH IGNITION BARRIER. 08.212 EXTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM WITH SPANDREL PANEL, SF-2. 09.273 PANELIZED STONE-LOOK INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM WITH INTEGRAL SILL, STN-1. 09.610 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 09.620 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-2 10.122 BUILDING SIGNAGE, UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT. 22.120 PREFABRICATED TRENCH DRAIN, SLOPE FLOOR TO DRAIN, RE: PLUMBING. 43.114 UNDERGROUND WATER STORAGE TANK WITH MAN HOLES, RE: EQUIPMENT. 43.116 HOSE TROUGH ATTACHED TO ROOF, RE: EQUIPMENT. GC TO COORDINATE KNOCKOUT THROUGH TO EQUIPMENT ROOM WITH COMTEC AFTER EQUIPMENT DELIVERY. 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-1 BUILDING SECTION2 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-1 BUILDING SECTION1 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 39 of 81 FLOOR 0" D1 A4-1 2 A4-1 CBA PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" RA1 43.116 05.611 05.410 05.872 05.872 03.110 A5-2 1 A5-2 2 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 05.861 03.181 09.610 05.315 03.170 03.110 A6-1 4 B.O. ROOF RAMING - LOW: 14' - 2" B.O. ROOF FRAMING - HIGH: 17' - 5" FLOOR 0" PLATFORM 9' - 6" D 1 A4-1 2 A4-1 CBA PARAPET-02 27' - 4" PARAPET-03 30' - 0" RA2 05.410 05.611 06.901 05.283 43.114 03.110 C C A5-2 3 01.104EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 RESTROOM 104 05.868 05.868 104 23.500 05.813 05.212 05.212 05.16005.160 05.311 05.311 A5-2 3 Sim A5-2 4 A5-2 4 Sim 05.240 07.350 A6-1 13 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 1 7 A M 1/4" = 1'-0" BUILDING SECTIONS 2202.58 A4-2 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-2 BUILDING SECTION1 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-2 BUILDING SECTION2 KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 01.104 DASHED LINE INDICATES EXTENTS OF THERMAL ENVELOPE, RE: COMCHECK ENVELOPE ANALYSIS. 03.110 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE, RE: STRUCTURAL. 03.170 CONCRETE FOUNDATION, RE: STRUCTURAL. 03.181 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.160 6" METAL STUDS 05.212 STEEL TUBE COLUMN FOR TOWER SCREEN WALL FRAMING, RE: STRUCTURAL, EPT-1 05.240 STEEL WIDE FLANGE BEAM, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.283 LIGHT GAUGE STEEL JOISTS, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.311 VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-1 05.315 HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 05.410 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING OVER PARAPET WALL 05.611 PBR METAL PANEL ROOFING, MR-1 05.813 SHIPS LADDER WITH INTEGRAL RAILING @ 36" AFF. 05.861 PREFINISHED METAL GUTTERS TO MATCH METAL ROOF. 05.868 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 18" ABOVE LOWER ROOF, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 05.872 AWNING, WITH METAL PANEL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 06.901 PLYWOOD PLATFORM, RE: STRUCTURAL 07.350 SPRAY-ON FOAM INSULATION WITH IGNITION BARRIER. 09.610 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 23.500 HEATER UNIT, RE: MECHANICAL 43.114 UNDERGROUND WATER STORAGE TANK WITH MAN HOLES, RE: EQUIPMENT. 43.116 HOSE TROUGH ATTACHED TO ROOF, RE: EQUIPMENT. GC TO COORDINATE KNOCKOUT THROUGH TO EQUIPMENT ROOM WITH COMTEC AFTER EQUIPMENT DELIVERY. 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 40 of 81 FLOOR 0" 1 PARAPET-01 20' - 8" 05.872 09.610 05.315 09.273 12 ' - 0 " A6-2 1 A6-2 4 05.410 03.181 A6-1 5 OH A6-1 7 A6-2 11 FLOOR 0" PLATFORM 9' - 6" 4 PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" 09.620 03.181 08.211 A6-2 1 A6-2 8 A6-2 4 A6-2 13 06.901 B.O. ROOF FRAMING: 24' - 4" FLOOR 0" 3 PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" 09.620 03.181 05.611 05.270 A6-2 1 A6-2 6 A6-2 4 A6-2 13 05.410 A6-1 8 05.611 03.110 03.170 B.O. ROOF FRAMING: 25' - 0" FLOOR 0" 4 PARAPET-01 20' - 8" PARAPET-02 27' - 4" A6-2 1 A6-2 9 05.868 09.620 05.611 05.270 05.861 05.410 03.181 05.611A6-2 4 A6-2 13 FLOOR 0" 2 03.170 03.110 03.181 05.611A6-2 10 A6-2 13 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 1 9 A M 1/2" = 1'-0" WALL SECTIONS 2202.58 A5-1 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 03.110 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE, RE: STRUCTURAL. 03.170 CONCRETE FOUNDATION, RE: STRUCTURAL. 03.181 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.270 METAL DECKING, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.315 HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 05.410 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING OVER PARAPET WALL 05.611 PBR METAL PANEL ROOFING, MR-1 05.861 PREFINISHED METAL GUTTERS TO MATCH METAL ROOF. 05.868 INTERNAL DOWNSPOUT DOWN TO 18" ABOVE LOWER ROOF, PROVIDE LAMBS TONGUE THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. 05.872 AWNING, WITH METAL PANEL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 06.901 PLYWOOD PLATFORM, RE: STRUCTURAL 08.211 EXTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM WITH 1" POLYCARBONATE PANEL, SF-1 09.273 PANELIZED STONE-LOOK INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM WITH INTEGRAL SILL, STN-1. 09.610 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 09.620 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-2 1/2" = 1'-0"A5-1 WALL SECTION1 1/2" = 1'-0"A5-1 WALL SECTION4 1/2" = 1'-0"A5-1 WALL SECTION3 1/2" = 1'-0"A5-1 WALL SECTION5 1/2" = 1'-0"A5-1 WALL SECTION2 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 41 of 81 FLOOR 0" B PARAPET-01 20' - 8" 12 ' - 0 " 08.132 05.283 05.872 05.410 03.181 05.611 05.315 A6-2 1 A6-2 3 09.610 A6-1 5 OH 03.170 03.110 B.O. ROOF FRAMING: 17' - 5" FLOOR 0" C PARAPET-01 20' - 8" 05.872 05.410 05.611 05.861 03.181 09.610 05.315 12 ' - 0 " A6-2 1 A6-2 5 A6-1 5 OH 08.132 03.110 03.170 B.O. ROOF RAMING: 14' - 2" FLOOR 0" PLATFORM 9' - 6" A PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 03.181 05.311 05.410 A6-2 2 A6-2 4 05.611 05.270 A6-2 11 06.901 B PARAPET-03 30' - 0" 05.270 05.611 05.311 06.310 05.160 06.310 05.410 05.212 A6-1 9 A6-1 10 A6-1 11 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 2 1 A M 1/2" = 1'-0" WALL SECTIONS 2202.58 A5-2 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 03.110 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE, RE: STRUCTURAL. 03.170 CONCRETE FOUNDATION, RE: STRUCTURAL. 03.181 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.160 6" METAL STUDS 05.212 STEEL TUBE COLUMN FOR TOWER SCREEN WALL FRAMING, RE: STRUCTURAL, EPT-1 05.270 METAL DECKING, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.283 LIGHT GAUGE STEEL JOISTS, RE: STRUCTURAL. 05.311 VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-1 05.315 HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 05.410 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING OVER PARAPET WALL 05.611 PBR METAL PANEL ROOFING, MR-1 05.861 PREFINISHED METAL GUTTERS TO MATCH METAL ROOF. 05.872 AWNING, WITH METAL PANEL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 06.310 PLYWOOD SHEATHING. 06.901 PLYWOOD PLATFORM, RE: STRUCTURAL 08.132 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM / POLYCARBONATE SECTIONAL ROLL-UP DOOR. 09.610 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 1/2" = 1'-0"A5-2 WALL SECTION1 1/2" = 1'-0"A5-2 WALL SECTION2 1/2" = 1'-0"A5-2 WALL SECTION3 1/2" = 1'-0"A5-2 WALL SECTION4 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 42 of 81 TYPE AM LOAD BEARING PARTITION -18 GA METAL STUDS TO DECK @ 16" OC UNO NON-LOAD BEARING PARTITION -25 GA METAL STUDS TO DECK W/ SLIP JOINT @ 16" OC UNO 1 LAYER OF 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH SIDE METAL STUDSBATT INSULATION WHEN OCCURS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING TYPE JM LOAD BEARING PARTITION -18 GA METAL STUDS TO DECK @ 16" OC UNO NON-LOAD BEARING PARTITION -25 GA METAL STUDS TO DECK W/ SLIP JOINT @ 16" OC UNO STUD FURRING WITH 1 LAYER OF 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD ON FINISHED SIDE METAL STUDSBATT INSULATION WHEN OCCURS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING SUBSTRATE GYP BD SHEATHING BATT INSULATION WHEN OCCURS 20 GA. UNPUNCHED METAL TRACK. FASTEN WITH (2)-#8 SELF TAPPING SCREWS J-MOLD EACH SIDE METAL STUD, FULL BATT INSULATION, R-15. SCHEDULED WIDTH 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD DECKING CEILING AS SCHED METAL STUD FRAMING AS SCHED R-19 BATT INSULATION. (1) #10-16 SCREW PER STUD FLANGE 20 GA. CONTINUOUS TRACK. WIDTH TO MATCH WALL STUD SIZE WALL BASE, REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FINISH FLOOR SHEATHING/FINISH, REFER TO WALL TYPE BATT INSULATION WHERE OCCURS WALL ANCHOR ACOUSTICAL CAULK COMPRESSIBLE FILLER (1) #10-16 SCREW PER STUD FLANGE 20 GA. CONTINUOUS TRACK. WIDTH TO MATCH WALL STUD SIZE WALL BASE, REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FINISH FLOOR SHEATHING/FINISH, REFER TO WALL TYPE BATT INSULATION WHERE OCCURS WALL ANCHOR ACOUSTICAL CAULK COMPRESSIBLE FILLER WALL SUBSTRATE, RE: PLANS CAR WASH UTILITY TRACK BY VENDOR CONDUITS AND HOSES BY VENDOR METAL ROOFING AS SCHEDULED LIGHT-GAUGE ROOF JOISTS RE: STRUCTURAL CONTINUOUS SEALANT VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-1 TRIM PER METAL PANEL MANUF. RECOMMEND. 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. TRIM PER EIFS MANUF. RECOMMEND. PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 ANCHOR STUD TO WALL; RE: STRUCTURAL 2x WOOD FRAMING PREFINISHED METAL SOFFIT PANEL J-MOULD TRIM AT WALL 4" FLASHING ZEE CLOSURE ROOF CLIP STANDING SEAM ROOF ON WEATHER BARRIER STUD BLOCKING FOR SLOPE CLIP ATTACHMENT RE: STRUCTURAL PREFINISHED FASCIA TRIM 3/4" EXTERIOR RATED PLYWOOD DECK CONTINUOUS SEALANT 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. CONTINUOUS SEALANT PANELIZED STONE-LOOK INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM, RE: ELEVATIONS. PRE-FINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE FLASHING. HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 PANELIZED STONE-LOOK INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM WITH INTEGRAL SILL, STN-1. 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. PRE-FINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE FLASHING. PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD NAILER T-10 METAL PANEL 3/4" EXTERIOR RATED PLYWOOD EA SIDE 2"3" CONTINUOUS SEALANT PREFINISHED GALV. METAL CAP FLASHING CONTINUOUS SEALANT PAINT EXPOSED PLYWOOD FASTEN NAILER TO STUD FRAMING 6" METAL STUD FRAMING T-10 METAL PANEL 3/4" EXTERIOR RATED PLYWOOD EA SIDE PAINT EXPOSED PLYWOOD 6" METAL STUD FRAMING BOTTOM J-MOULD GALVANIZED METAL TRACK 4x4 STEEL TUBE COLUMN, PAINTED, RE: STRUCTURAL CONTINUOUS SEALANT W/ TERMINATION BAR FLASHING SAME GAUGE AND FINISH AS ROOF FASTENERS PER MANUF INSTRUCTIONS METAL PANEL ROOF METAL DECK WHERE OCCURS STEEL JOIST, RE: STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENT CLIPS, RE: STRUCTURAL 4x4 STEEL TUBE COLUMN, PAINTED, RE: STRUCTURAL METAL PANEL SCREEN WALL 3/4" EXTERIOR RATED PLYWOOD, EA SIDE 6" METAL STUD FRAMING 3 5/8" METAL STUD AND TRACK FOR SHIMMING CORNER CLOSURE PER MANUF PAINT EXPOSED INTERIOR PLYWOOD SHEATHING METAL PANEL SCREEN WALL 1' - 0 " 1 ' - 0 " 2" DIA SCHED 40 STEEL GUARDRAIL 1 1/2" DIA SCHED 40 STEEL INTERMEDIATE RAILS, TYP. 2x2 ANGLE TRIM TO COVER EXPOSED DECK EDGE WELD VERT POST TO STRUCTURE PLYWOOD DECK, RE: STRUCTURAL WELD ALL CONNECTIONS AND GRIND SMOOTH, TYP. STEEL WIDE FLANGE BEAM, RE: STRUCTURAL. SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 2 4 A M As indicated DETAILS 2202.58 A6-1 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-TOP OF INTERIOR WALL DETAIL1 MARK STUD SIZE PARTITION THK FIRE RATING FIRE TEST STC RATING TOP CONNECTION BOTTOM CONNECTION SPECIAL CONDITION REMARKS AM060 6" 7 1/4" -- -- 1/A6-1 2/A6-1 MARK STUD SIZE PARTITION THK FIRE RATING FIRE TEST STC RATING TOP CONNECTION BOTTOM CONNECTION SPECIAL CONDITION REMARKS JM036 3 5/8" 4 1/4" -- -- 3/A6-1 JM060 6" 6 5/8" -- -- 3/A6-1 3" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-METAL WALL-BOTTOM CONNECTION2 3" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-METAL WALL-BOTTOM CONNECTION-FURRED3 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-HOSE BASKET DETAIL4 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-VERTICAL TRANSITION - EIFS TO VERTICAL METAL PANEL6 1" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-CANOPY W/ EIFS & METAL PANEL5 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-HORIZONTAL TRANSITION - METAL PANEL TO BRICK LOOK PANEL7 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-HORIZONTAL TRANSITION - EIFS TO PVC FORM8 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-METAL STUD PARAPET WITH METAL PANEL9 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-METAL STUD SILL WITH METAL PANEL10 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-COLUMN THRU METAL ROOF11 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-METAL PANEL AT CORNER COLUMN12 3/4" = 1'-0"A6-1 DTL-GUARDRAIL13 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 43 of 81 1/2" EXPANSION MATL FOUNDATION, RE: STRUCTURAL. 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. CONCRETE S.O.G. 1/2" EXPANSION MATL ADJACENT HARDSCAPE, RE: CIVIL. FOUNDATION, RE: STRUCTURAL. PANELIZED STONE-LOOK INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM, RE: ELEVATIONS. 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 2" PRE-FINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE FLASHING. 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCT FOR REINFORCING 1/2" EXPANSION MATL CONCRETE S.O.G. CONCRETE FOUNDATION, RE: STRUCTURAL 6" METAL STUD 5/8" GYP BD R-13 BATT INSULATION FINISH AS SCHED BASE AS SCHED FINISH FLOOR AS SCHED PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD NAILER 2"3" CONTINUOUS SEALANT PREFINISHED GALV. METAL CAP FLASHING CONTINUOUS SEALANT ANCHOR PER STRUCT. DWGS. 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN- PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCT FOR REINFORCING PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD NAILER 2"3" CONTINUOUS SEALANT PREFINISHED GALV. METAL CAP FLASHING CONTINUOUS SEALANT ANCHOR PER STRUCT. DWGS. 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN- PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCT FOR REINFORCING VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-1 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. CONTINUOUS SEALANT FLASHING, MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO ROOF PBR ROOF PANEL 2" TERMINATION BAR LIGHT GAUGE JOIST FRAMING, RE: STRUCTURAL EXTERIOR CLOSURE MATERIAL PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 CONTINUOUS SEALANT FLASHING, MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO ROOF TERMINATION BAR PBR METAL PANEL ROOF GASKET AT SCREWS LIGHT GAUGE ROOF FRAMING, RE: STRUCTURAL 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. STEEL ANGLE, RE: STRUCTURAL. PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 6 1/2" 1'-3" 6" 10 " LIGHT GAUGE ROOF FRAMING, RE: STRUCT CONTINUOUS ANGLE SUPPORT, RE: STRUCT PBR ROOF PANEL PBR ROOF CLOSURE STRIP BENT METAL GUTTER, EXTEND 15" BEYOND GUTTER EDGE TERMINATION BAR WITH SEALANT MECHANICAL FASTENER ATTACHMENT OF DECK TO ANGLE 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCT FOR REINFORCING LIGHT GAUGE BOX BEAM PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 CONTINUOUS SEALANT FLASHING, MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO ROOF PBR METAL ROOF PANEL TERMINATION BAR ROOF FRAMING, RE: STRUCT EXTERIOR CLOSURE MATERIAL BATT INSULATION 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 BEAM BEARING & PLATE, RE: STRUCTURALLIGHT GAUGE ROOF JOISTS, RE: STRUCTURAL 6"1'-3" ROOF STRUCTURE, RE: STRUCT CLIP ATTACHMENT, RE: STRUCT ANGLE SUPPORT BETWEEN ROOF STRUCTURE, RE: STRUCT PBR ROOF PANEL PBR ROOF CLOSURE STRIP BENT METAL GUTTER, EXTEND 15" BEYOND GUTTER EDGE TERMINATION BAR WITH SEALANT LIGHT GAUGE ROOF JOISTS, RE: STRUCT MECHANICAL FASTENER ATTACHMENT OF DECK TO ANGLE 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 BEAM BEARING & PLATE, RE: STRUCTURAL 6" 10 " CONTINUOUS SEALANT SET TRIM PIECE OVER SCUPPER HEAD WELDED WATERTIGHT SCUPPER SET IN MASTIC CONTINUOUS SEALANT CONTINUOUS SEALANT PROVIDE METAL WALL FLASHING OVER SCUPPER EDGE PBR METAL ROOF PANEL WITH CLOSURE GUTTER ASSEMBLY, SEE GUTTER DETAIL 6" 7" 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. BEAM BEARING & PLATE, RE: STRUCTURAL PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 ZEE PURLINS JOIST ATTACHMENT CLIP, RE: STRUCTURAL PBR METAL ROOF PANEL ANCHOR PER STRUCTURAL 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 1/2" EXPANSION MATL ADJACENT HARDSCAPE, RE: CIVIL. FOUNDATION, RE: STRUCTURAL. VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-1 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. PRE-FINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE FLASHING. 2" VERTICAL METAL PANEL, MP-1. METAL L CORNER TRIM INSTALLED PER MFR. RECOMMENDATIONS VERTICAL METAL PANEL, MP-1. 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 2 7 A M As indicated DETAILS 2202.58 A6-2 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-CONCRETE AT FOUNDATION WALL13 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-CONCRETE AT FOUNDATION WALL W/ BRICK11 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-CONCRETE AT FOUNDATION WALL W/ FURRING14 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-PARAPET WITH EIFS1 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-PARAPET WITH METAL PANEL2 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-WALL TO ROOF - HIGH3 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-WALL TO ROOF - SIDE4 1" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-GUTTER AT LOW ROOF - PARALLEL TO JOIST5 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-WALL TO ROOF W/DECK - HIGH6 1" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-GUTTER AT TOWER ROOF - PERPENDICULAR TO JOIST8 1" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-OVERFLOW AT TOWER ROOF9 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-WALL TO ROOF10 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-CONCRETE AT FOUNDATION WALL W/ METAL PANEL12 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-2 DTL-METAL PANEL EXTERIOR CORNER15 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 44 of 81 D C 3 A7-1A7-1 3 2 4 5 22.322 22.210 TA-1 TA-5 TA-3 TA-1 104 CLEAR 6'-4" CL E A R 7' - 0 " AM 0 6 0 JM 0 3 6 AM060 JM060 22.830 23.530 4' - 0 " 09.210 09.244 TA-1 22.322 09.301 23.530 TA-2 4" 104 4' - 0 " 09.210 09.244 09.301 23.530 4" 4' - 0 " 09.210 09.244 TA-1 TA-2 22.322 22.830 09.301 TA-3 TA-5 TA-4 TA-6 22.210 4" 4' - 0 " 09.210 09.244 TA-6 TA-3 09.301 TA-5 TA-4 4" SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 3 0 A M 1/2" = 1'-0" ENLARGED PLANS AND INT ELEV 2202.58 A7-1 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 INTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION MFR MODEL/COLOR REMARKS FLOOR SC-1 SEALED CONCRETE FLOOR FINISH TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER WALL FRP-1 4' HIGH FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANEL TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER RESTROOMS IPT-1 PAINT TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER GYP BOARD WALLS IPT-2 PAINT TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER GYP BOARD CEILING PVC-1 PVC WALL FORM NUFORM CONFORM, 8", NUFORM WHITE WALL BASE RBB-1 4" RUBBER WALL BASE TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER KEYNOTES VALUE KEYNOTE TEXT 09.210 5/8" GYPSUM WALLBOARD 09.244 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANEL 09.301 WALL BASE AS SCHEDULED 22.210 WALL MOUNTED SINK, RE: PLUMBING. 22.322 ADA HEIGHT LOW FLOW FLOOR MOUNTED TOILET, RE: PLUMBING. 22.830 INSTANT HOT WATER DEVICE, RE: PLUMBING. 23.530 BASEBOARD HEATER, RE: MECHANICAL. TOILET ACCESSORY SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL COUNT TA-1 1 1/4" DIAMETER STAINLESS STEEL GRAB BARS WITH SNAP FLANGE BOBRICK WASHROOM EQUIPMENT, INC. B-5806 SERIES 3 TA-2 RECESSED MULTI-ROLL TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER BOBRICK WASHROOM EQUIPMENT, INC. B-3888 1 TA-3 SURFACE MOUNTED PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER BOBRICK WASHROOM EQUIPMENT, INC. B-4262 1 TA-4 24" x 36" GLASS MIRROR WITH STAINLESS STEEL ANGLE FRAME BOBRICK WASHROOM EQUIPMENT, INC. B-2908 SERIES 1 TA-5 WALL MOUNTED SOAP DISPENSER BOBRICK WASHROOM EQUIPMENT, INC. B-42 1 TA-6 PLUMBING GUARD TRUEBRO LAVGUARD 2 EZ 1 NOTE: REFER TO ACCESSIBILITY SHEET (A0-3) FOR ALL TOILET ACCESSORY MOUNTING AND CLEARANCE DIMENSIONS. 1/2" = 1'-0"A7-1 RR ENLARGED PLAN1 1/2" = 1'-0"A7-1 RESTROOM - NORTH2 1/2" = 1'-0"A7-1 RESTROOM - EAST3 1/2" = 1'-0"A7-1 RESTROOM - WEST4 1/2" = 1'-0"A7-1 RESTROOM - SOUTH5 WALL SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION FIRE RATING REMARKS SPECIAL CONDITION AM060 6" METAL STUD WITH 1 LAYER OF 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH SIDE. -- JM036 3 5/8" METAL FURRING WITH 1 LAYER OF 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD ON FINISHED SIDE. -- JM060 6" METAL FURRING WITH 1 LAYER OF 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD ON FINISHED SIDE. -- 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 45 of 81 F FLUSH OHS OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR DOOR ELEVATIONS SEE SCHED. 2" SE E D O O R S C H E D . HOLLOW METAL FRAME DOOR PANEL ALUMINUM FRAME POLY- CARBONATE PANELS RA ROOF ACCESS DOOR 4-SIDED HOLLOW METAL FRAME DOOR PANEL HOLLOW METAL FRAME; SEE PLAN AND WALL SECTIONS FOR WALL ASSEMBLY SEALANT AT PERIMETER OF DOOR FRAME; BOTH SIDES OF FRAME DOOR AS SCHED HOLLOW METAL FRAME SEE PLAN AND WALL SECTIONS FOR WALL ASSEMBLY SEALANT AT PERIMETER OF DOOR FRAME; BOTH SIDES OF FRAME 1/ 2 " 1/ 2 " DOOR AS SCHED DOUBLE STUD JAMB JAMB ANCHORS, MIN 3 PER JAMB CONCRETE S.O.G. MAN DOOR AS SCHED FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL PROVIDE DOOR THRESHOLD WHERE DISSIMILAR MATERIALS MEET 3/ 4 " BACKER ROD AND CONTINUOUS SEALANT BOTH SIDES INSTALL SHIMS TO CENTER DOOR FRAME IN ROUGH OPENING HOLLOW METAL FRAME WEATHERSTRIP DOOR PANEL PER DOOR SCHEDULE FLASHING 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 INSTALL SHIMS TO CENTRE DOOR FRAME IN ROUGH OPENING HOLLOW METAL FRAME APPLY SEALANT WITH BACKER ROD ALL AROUND AT EACH SIDE OF DOOR FRAME WEATHERSTRIP FASTEN FRAME WITH 3/8"Dx5" FLATHEAD EXPANSION ANCHOR BOLTS. (3 PER JAMB) UNCORED CONFORM STARTER DOOR PANEL PER DOOR SCHEDULE 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN- PLACE CONCRETE WALL RE: STRUCT. PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 PRE-FINISHED METAL FLASHING. DOOR THRESHOLD, SET IN CONT. BED OF SEALANT 1/2" EXPANSION MATERIAL CONCRETE S.O.G. SWEEP AT EXTERIOR LOCATIONS DOOR PANEL PER DOOR SCHEDULE PRE-FINISHED BRAKE METAL FLASHING. 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 OVERHEAD DOOR TRACK SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOOR GASKET SEAL PER DOOR MANUF LIFT MECHANISM BY DOOR MANUFACTURER HORIZONTAL REINFORCING, RE: STRUCTURAL PRE-FINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE FLASHING. PRE-FINISHED BRAKE METAL JAMB 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOOR SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOOR TRACK ANGLE ATTACHMENT PER DOOR MANUFACTURER HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 TRIM PER METAL PANEL MANUF. RECOMMEND. CONCRETE S.O.G. BASE PER SOILS REPORT 2" RIGID INSULATION CONCRETE FOUNDATION CONCRETE S.O.G. 1/2" EXPANSION MATL SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOOR WITH WEATHERSTRIPPING • ALL ROUGH OPENINGS TO BE VERIFIED WITH DOOR MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO ORDERING DOOR PACKAGE. • VERIFY HARDWARE TYPES AND FINISHES WITH PROJECT OWNER. REFER TO PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. DOOR NOTES PRE-FINISHED BRAKE METAL JAMB 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOOR SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOOR TRACK ANGLE ATTACHMENT PER DOOR MANUFACTURER PANELIZED STONE-LOOK INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM, RE: ELEVATIONS. BACKER ROD AND CONTINUOUS SEALANT. SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 3 3 A M As indicated DOOR TYPES AND DETAILS 2202.58 A8-1 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 DOOR HARDWARE SCHEDULE HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 4 - EXTERIOR MAN DOOR (SINGLE) • (1.5 EA) HINGE: HAGER BB1279 STEEL HINGES 4 1/2" X 4 1/2" • (1 EA) OVERHEAD CLOSER: LCN 1461-DA • (1 EA) THRESHOLD: PEMKO 170A (OR 257A AS REQUIRED) • (1 EA) WEATHERPROOFING: PEMKO S88D • (1 EA) SWEEP: PEMKO 18100DP OR 18061DP • (1 EA) STORAGEROOM LOCKSET - SCHLAGE SERIES 4000, GRADE 1, RHODES LEVER, 626 FINISH • (1 EA) DEADBOLT: B660P, 626 FINISH • (1 EA) RIM CYLINDER: SCH "C" X US26D • (3 EA) SILENCERS: GLYNN-JOHNSON, GJ64 • (1 EA) FLOOR STOP: MM FS13 X US26D • (2 EA) 10" KICKPLATE: IVES 8400 ALUMINUM 9 - INTERIOR RESTROOM DOOR (SINGLE) • (1.5 EA) HINGE: HAGER BB1279 STEEL HINGES 4 1/2" X 4 1/2" • (1 EA) OVERHEAD CLOSER: LCN 1461-DA • (1 EA) PRIVACY LOCKSET - SCHLAGE SERIES 4000, GRADE 1, RHODES LEVER, 626 FINISH • (3 EA) SILENCERS: GLYNN-JOHNSON, GJ64 • (1 EA) WALL STOP: GLYNN-JOHNSON 60W • (1 EA) SIGN: MEN'S AND WOMEN'S ADA SIGNAGE RESPECTIVELY 15 - OVERHEAD DOOR • (1 EA) PADLOCK AT OVERHEAD DOORS: HEAVY-DUTY PADLOCK. • (TBD) BALANCE OF HARDWARE BY DOOR SUPPPLIER DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR #TYPE DETAILS OPENING PANEL FRAME HARDWARE GROUP FIRE RATING REMARKSHEAD JAMB SILL WIDTH HEIGHT THICK NESS MATERIAL INSIDE FINISH OUTSIDE FINISH MATERIAL INSIDE FINISH OUTSIDE FINISH GROUP 101A OHS 7/A8-1 8&9/A8-1 10/A8-1 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 1 3/4" ALUM/POLY MFR MFR (none) 15 N/A 101B OHS 7/A8-1 8&9/A8-1 10/A8-1 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 1 3/4" ALUM/POLY MFR MFR (none) 15 N/A 102A OHS 7/A8-1 8&9/A8-1 10/A8-1 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 1 3/4" ALUM/POLY MFR MFR (none) 15 N/A 102B OHS 7/A8-1 8&9/A8-1 10/A8-1 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 1 3/4" ALUM/POLY MFR MFR (none) 15 N/A 103A F 4/A8-1 5/A8-1 6/A8-1 4' - 0" 7' - 0" 1 3/4" HM EPT-1 EPT-1 HM EPT-1 EPT-1 4 N/A 104 F 1/A8-1 2/A8-1 3/A8-1 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 1 3/4" HM EPT-1 EPT-1 HM EPT-1 EPT-1 9 N/A 105A OHS 7/A8-1 8&9/A8-1 10/A8-1 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 1 3/4" ALUM/POLY MFR MFR (none) 15 N/A 105B OHS 7/A8-1 8&9/A8-1 10/A8-1 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 1 3/4" ALUM/POLY MFR MFR (none) 15 N/A 106A OHS 7/A8-1 8&9/A8-1 10/A8-1 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 1 3/4" ALUM/POLY MFR MFR (none) 15 N/A 106B OHS 7/A8-1 8&9/A8-1 10/A8-1 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 1 3/4" ALUM/POLY MFR MFR (none) 15 N/A RA1 RA 4/A8-1 5/A8-1 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 1 3/4" HM EPT-1 EPT-1 HM EPT-1 EPT-1 MFR N/A ROOF ACCESS DOOR RA2 RA 4/A8-1 5/A8-1 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 1 3/4" HM EPT-1 EPT-1 HM EPT-1 EPT-1 MFR N/A ROOF ACCESS DOOR 3" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-INTERIOR MAN DOOR HEAD1 3" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-INTERIOR MAN DOOR JAMB2 3" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-INTERIOR MAN DOOR SILL3 3" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-MAN DOOR HEAD @ PVC FORM - STUCCO4 3" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-MAN DOOR JAMB @ PVC FORM - STUCCO5 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-MAN DOOR SILL @ PVC FORM6 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-O.H. DOOR HEAD @ PVC FORM7 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-O.H. DOOR JAMB @ PVC FORM - MTL PANEL8 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-O.H. DOOR SILL10 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A8-1 DTL-O.H. DOOR JAMB @ PVC FORM - STONE LOOK PANEL9 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 46 of 81 WINDOW TYPES C ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEMS A ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEMS B ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEMS FLOOR 0" 3'-6"3'-6"3'-6"3'-6" 2"x2.5" ALUMINUM MULLIONS, SF-2 SPANDREL, VIRACON V957 SUBDUED GRAY, SF-2 14'-0" 6' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 5 A8-2 4 A8-2 6 A8-2 DO NOT APPLY SEALANT ABOVE FLASHING. 16 GA GALVANIZED FLASHING WITH PREDRILLED HOLES FOR SCREWS 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. SPANDREL GLAZING, RE: ELEVATIONS & FINISH SCHEDULE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT "VENEER" FRAMING, RE: ELEVATIONS & FINISH SCHEDULE 1 1/2X 1 1/2 STEEL ANGLE FOR STOREFRONT VENEER ATTACHMENT, ANCHORED TO CONCRETE. HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 HORIZONTAL METAL WALL PANELS, MP-2 BACKER ROD AND CONTINUOUS SEALANT. SPANDREL GLAZING, RE: ELEVATIONS & FINISH SCHEDULE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT "VENEER" FRAMING, RE: ELEVATIONS & FINISH SCHEDULE 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. 1 1/2X 1 1/2 STEEL ANGLE FOR STOREFRONT VENEER ATTACHMENT, ANCHORED TO CONCRETE.TRIM PER METAL PANEL MANUF. RECOMMEND. SPANDREL GLAZING, RE: ELEVATIONS & FINISH SCHEDULE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT "VENEER" FRAMING, RE: ELEVATIONS & FINISH SCHEDULE 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. PANELIZED STONE-LOOK INSULATING FINISH SYSTEM WITH INTEGRAL SILL, STN-1. 1 1/2X 1 1/2 STEEL ANGLE FOR STOREFRONT VENEER ATTACHMENT, ANCHORED TO CONCRETE. BACKER ROD AND CONTINUOUS SEALANT. GLAZING, RE: ELEVATIONS & FINISH SCHEDULE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING WOOD SHIM AS REQUIRED BACKER ROD AND CONTINUOUS SEALANT, BOTH SIDES. 16 GA GALVANIZED FLASHING PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. GLAZING, RE: ELEVATIONS & FINISH SCHEDULE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING WOOD SHIM AS REQUIRED CONTINUOUS SEALANT AND BACKING ROD AROUND FRAME EDGES CONTINUOUS CORNER AND FLAT BEADS OF SEALANT AT TOP OF FLASHING AT INSIDE FACE OF HEADER. DO NOT APPLY SEALANT ABOVE FLASHING. 16 GA GALVANIZED FLASHING WITH PREDRILLED HOLES FOR SCREWS PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING SHIM AS REQUIRED GLAZING, RE: ELEVATIONS & FINISH SCHEDULE BACKER ROD AND CONTINUOUS SEALANT BOTH SIDES ANCHOR WINDOW AS REQUIRED BY WINDOW MANUFACTURER PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM, ST-1 8" PVC FORM, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL, RE: STRUCTURAL. PRE-FINISHED METAL FLASHING. FLOOR 0" 2' - 0 " 21 ' - 0 " 8'-0" POLYCARBONATE PANELS, SF-1 2"x4.5" ALUMINUM MULLIONS, SF-1 1 A8-2 3 A8-2 2 A8-2 FLOOR 0" 2' - 0 " 21 ' - 0 " 12' - 0" POLYCARBONATE PANELS, SF-1 2"x4.5" ALUMINUM MULLIONS, SF-1 2 A8-2 1 A8-2 3 A8-2 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 3 5 A M As indicated WINDOW TYPES AND DETAILS 2202.58 A8-2 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 3" = 1'-0"A8-2 DTL-SPANDREL VENEER HEAD AT PVC FORM4 3" = 1'-0"A8-2 DTL-SPANDREL VENEER JAMB AT PVC FORM5 3" = 1'-0"A8-2 DTL-SPANDREL VENEER SILL AT PVC FORM6 3" = 1'-0"A8-2 DTL-STOREFRONT SILL AT PVC FORM3 3" = 1'-0"A8-2 DTL-STOREFRONT HEAD AT PVC FORM1 3" = 1'-0"A8-2 DTL-STOREFRONT JAMB AT PVC FORM2 01/18/202405/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 47 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s id e _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 7 : 3 6 A M ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE 2202.58 A8-3 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 5/27/2024 CLT ASM 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE NUMBER NAME FLOOR FINISH WALL BASE WALLS CEILINGS NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST MATERIAL FINISH HEIGHTMATERIAL FINISH MATERIAL FINISH MATERIAL FINISH MATERIAL FINISH 101 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY SC-1 - PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR EXP 102 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY SC-1 - PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR EXP 103 EQUIPMENT ROOM SC-1 - PVC-1 MFR PVC-1/GYP MFR/IPT-1 PVC-1/GYP MFR/IPT-1 PVC-1 MFR EXP 104 RESTROOM SC-1 RBB-1 GYP/FRP-1 IPT-1 GYP/FRP-1 IPT-1 GYP/FRP-1 IPT-1 GYP/FRP-1 IPT-1 GYP IPT-2 8' - 0" 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY SC-1 - PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR EXP 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY SC-1 - PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR PVC-1 MFR EXP INTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION MFR MODEL/COLOR REMARKS FLOOR SC-1 SEALED CONCRETE FLOOR FINISH TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER WALL FRP-1 4' HIGH FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANEL TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER RESTROOMS IPT-1 PAINT TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER GYP BOARD WALLS IPT-2 PAINT TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER GYP BOARD CEILING PVC-1 PVC WALL FORM NUFORM CONFORM, 8", NUFORM WHITE WALL BASE RBB-1 4" RUBBER WALL BASE TBD BY OWNER TBD, BY OWNER 01/18/202405/27/2024 TROY KIRSCHMAN - ARCHITECT 05/27/2024 Exhibit R - Page 48 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 4 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 4 : 0 3 P M CAR WASH EQUIPMENT DETAILS 2202.58 CW-1 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 3/11/2024 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 Exhibit R - Page 49 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 4 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 4 : 0 6 P M CAR WASH EQUIPMENT DETAILS 2202.58 CW-2 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 3/11/2024 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 Exhibit R - Page 50 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 4 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 4 : 0 9 P M CAR WASH EQUIPMENT DETAILS 2202.58 CW-3 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 3/11/2024 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 Exhibit R - Page 51 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ c l t i d w e l l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 5 8 A u t o w a s h L a k e s i de _ C E N T R A L _ c l t i d w e l l . r v t 4 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 4 : 1 1 P M CAR WASH EQUIPMENT DETAILS 2202.58 CW-4 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 3/11/2024 CLT MBB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 Exhibit R - Page 52 of 81 NOTE: UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION OF CONSTRUCTING INTERSECTIONS WITH OR WITHOUT CONSTRUCTION JOINTS. REINFORCE PER APPLICABLE DETAIL. NOTE: UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION OF REINFORCING CORNERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OPTION #1 OR OPTION #2. DOWELSTD. 90° HOOKSTD. 90° HOOKCORNER BAR TYP.U.N.O. NOT SHOWN VERTICAL REINF. U.N.O. NOT SHOWN VERTICAL REINF. STD. 90° HOOK WHERE INDICATED STD. 90° HOOK WHERE INDICATED VERTICAL REINF. NOT SHOWN GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: A. DESIGN DATA: DESIGN CODE: 2018 IBC CONCRETE 28-DAY STRENGTH: F'C = 4,500 PSI MISCELLANEOUS ROLLED SECTIONS AND PLATES (ANGLES, CHANNELS, PLATES, ETC.) ASTM A36 (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) PLAIN BOLTS AND ANCHORS ASTM A307 REINFORCING STEEL ASTM A615 FY = 60,000 PSI ANCHOR RODS ASTM F1554 (36 KSI) MORTAR TYPE S & GROUT 28-DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH = 2,000 PSI (MASONRY CEMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE) COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE MASONRY NET AREA COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT 2,800 PSI NET AREA COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF MASONRY f'm = 2,000 PSI ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY 2,500 PSF DESIGN LOADS: - DEAD (D) = 20 PSF - SNOW (S) = 35 PSF (GROUND SNOW, Pg) PLUS DRIFTING RISK CATEGORY II WIND LOADING CRITERIA (ASCE 7-16) 115 (ULTIMATE) EXPOSURE C; I = 1.0 SEISMIC LOADING CRITERIA (ASCE 7-16) IMPORTANCE FACTOR = 1.0 MAPPED SPECTRAL RESPONSE Ss = 0.219g, S1 = 0.059g SITE CLASS = C SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFICIENTS, SDS = 0.19g, SD1 = 0.059g SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY = B SEISMIC FORCE RESISTANT SYSTEM = ORDINARY REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS - RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR (R) = 4 - ANALYSIS PROCEDURE = EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE B. FOUNDATION WORK: 1. THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY KUMAR & ASSOCIATES (PROJECT No. 22-1-620), DATED DECEMBER 9, 2022 IS AVAILABLE AND SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE CONTRACTOR. REFER TO THE REPORT FOR OVEREXCAVATION AND RECOMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE FOOTING ELEVATIONS WITH FINAL GRADING PLAN TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 3'-0" OF GRADE ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF ALL FOOTINGS. 3. SUBSOILS SUPPORTING OR IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH FOOTINGS, SLABS/ON/GRADE, OR OTHER FOUNDATION ELEMENTS SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST FREEZING CONDITIONS THAT COULD CAUSE MOVEMENT OR OTHER DETRIMENTAL EFFECT TO THE STRUCTURE AS A WHOLE OR TO ANY OF ITS COMPONENT PARTS. 4. WHEN WORKING NEAR EXISTING AND/OR NEW CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION SO AS NOT TO UNDERMINE, DISTURB, DAMAGE OR, IN ANY WAY, CAUSE UNDESIRABLE MOVEMENT, CRACKING, AND/OR SETTLEMENT OF THE ADJACENT CONSTRUCTION. 5. SLABS ON GRADE SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON SUBGRADE THAT HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "SUB EXCAVATION" SECTION IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. ANY UNACCEPTABLE UNDISTURBED VIRGIN SOIL OR BACKFILL/GRANULAR FILL, AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER'S GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. C. CONCRETE: 1. FOR REINFORCEMENT DEVELOPMENT LENGTH AND SPLICE LENGTH SEE TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT TABLE ON THIS SHEET. 2. PROVIDE CORNER BARS IN WALLS AND FOOTINGS THE SAME SIZE AND NUMBER AS THE CONTINUOUS REINFORCING. 3. REINFORCING IN FOOTINGS SHALL BE ACCURATELY PLACED BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. DO NOT FLOAT REINFORCING INTO FOOTINGS. 4. CONCRETE SHALL BE REGULAR WEIGHT (144 PCF) WITH TYPE I/II CEMENT (4,500 PSI), WITH POTABLE WATER. CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO ACI 301. THE MAXIMUM WATER-CEMENT RATIO SHALL BE 0.45. AIR ENTRAINMENT SHALL BE 6% FOR FOOTINGS & SLABS. COVERED WALLS SHALL HAVE NATURAL AIR (MAX 3%). MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE IS 34" 5. MECHANICALLY VIBRATE CONCRETE, EXCEPT THAT SLABS ON GRADE NEED TO BE VIBRATED ONLY AROUND UNDERFLOOR DUCTS AND OTHER ITEMS EMBEDDED IN THE SLAB. EMBEDDED ITEMS INCLUDE ELECTRICAL CONDUITS, MECHANICAL PIPING, AND STEEL ANGLES OR CHANNELS. EMBEDDED ITEMS DOES NOT IMPLY REINFORCING STEEL. ALL OTHER CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL BE VIBRATED. CONCRETE SHALL BE VIBRATED IN CONFORMANCE WITH ACI 309. VIBRATE CONCRETE ONLY UNTIL THE CONCRETE IS THOROUGHLY CONSOLIDATED AND THE VOIDS FILLED. INSERT INTERNAL VIBRATORS VERTICALLY TO THE FULL DEPTH OF THE LAYER BEING PLACED AND INTO THE PREVIOUS LAYER IF APPLICABLE. DO NOT DRAG VIBRATORS THROUGH THE CONCRETE. DO NOT FLOW CONCRETE FROM ONE LOCATION TO ANOTHER BY USE OF VIBRATOR. 6. DO NOT PLACE PIPES, DUCTS, OR CHASES IN STRUCTURAL CONCRETE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. SEE ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS. 7. FLOOR SURFACE TOLERANCE CLASS "B". SEE ACI 301 FOR PROCEDURE OF MEASUREMENT AND CORRECTION. 8. CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT COLUMN-LINE INTERSECTIONS, AND AT RE-ENTRANT CORNERS AND AT A MAXIMUM SPACING INDICATED BELOW AND HAVE A MAXIMUM ASPECT RATIO OF 1.5 TO 1.0 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. SEE DETAIL - ON DRAWING - FOR CONTROL JOINT REQUIREMENTS. SLAB THICKNESS MAX. CONTROL JOINT SPACING 4" 12'-0" 5" 15'-0" 9. ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN CONCRETE WALLS SHALL HAVE A 2" X 4" CONTINUOUS KEYWAY. ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, EXCEPT THOSE DETAILED, SHALL HAVE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER APPROVAL. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OTHER CONSTRUCTION JOINT REQUIREMENTS. 10. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE DEFORMED NEW BILLETS BARS (A615, GRADE 60), BENT COLD, AND DETAILED, FABRICATED, AND HELD IN PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR DETAILING REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES" (ACI 315 - LATEST EDITION) EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE DETAILED OR SPECIFIED. 11. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET (NOTE #3, S2-0) ALL OTHER INTERIOR SLABS ON GRADE NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED SHALL BE: SLAB THICKNESS SLAB REINFORCEMENT SUBBASE 4" 6x6-W2.9xW2.9 WWF SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 5" 6x6-W2.9xW2.9 WWF SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 12. ALL REINFORCING IN SLABS AND WALLS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS UNLESS DETAILED OTHERWISE AND LAP SPLICED ONLY IN REGIONS OF LOW STRESS. ALL BARS SHALL HAVE A STANDARD HOOK WHERE A HOOK IS SHOWN, UNLESS DETAILED OTHERWISE. D. MASONRY: 1. FURNISH AND CONSTRUCT MASONRY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION (ACI 530.1-16/ASCE 6-05/TMS 602-16.) 2. LAY MASONRY UNITS IN RUNNING BOND. 3. MAXIMUM GROUT LIFT WITHOUT CLEANOUTS 4'-0" IN BLOCK WALLS AND 8" IN GROUTED TWO-WYTHE WALLS. 4.IN 8" WALLS, PROVIDE CONTINUOUS FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL REINFORCING IN CENTER OF GROUT AT CENTER OF WALL. TYPICAL REINFORCING SHALL BE 1-#5 AT 1'-4" ON CENTER AND 2-#5 AT CORNERS, INTERSECTIONS, WALL ENDS, AND SIDE OF EXPANSION OR CONTROL JOINTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REINFORCEMENT SHALL RUN FULL HEIGHT OF WALL. 5.GROUT CELLS FULL AT ALL ANCHOR AND EMBED LOCATIONS. 6.PROVIDE HORIZONTAL LADDER WIRE REINFORCEMENT AT 16" ON CENTER VERTICAL SPACING IN ALL CONCRETE MASONRY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 7.SPLICE MASONRY WALL REINFORCING AS SCHEDULED ON 11/S3-0. 8. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS BOND BEAMS AT THE TOP OF ALL WALLS. 9. ALL MASONRY CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE LEVEL 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ACCORD WITH TMS 602-16 SECTION 1.14. PERIODIC INSPECTION SHALL BE INTERPRETED AS TWO TIMES PER WEEK. E. OTHER: 1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, EXPANSION ANCHORS SHALL BE THE SIMPSON STRONG BOLT EXPANSION ANCHORS OR APPROVED EQUAL. ADHESIVE ANCHORS SHALL BE THE SIMPSON SET SYSTEM, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR INCONSISTENCIES. 3. VERIFY IN FIELD ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 4. ESTABLISH AND VERIFY ALL OPENINGS AND INSERTS FOR MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES. PROVIDE ALL TEMPORARY BRACING, SHORING, GUYING, OR OTHER MEANS TO AVOID EXCESSIVE STRESSES AND TO HOLD STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5. ANY ENGINEERING DESIGN PROVIDED BY OTHERS AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW SHALL BEAR THE STAMP (AND SIGNATURE) OF AN ENGINEER REGISTERED IN COLORADO. 1. REINFORCING BAR DEVELOPMENT AND LAP SPLICE LENGTH SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN THIS TABLES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. THE LENGTHS SHOWN IN THE TABLES ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CONCRETE COVERAGE AND REINFORCING C-C SPACING: BEAMS OR COLUMNS: COVER (EQUAL OR MORE) 1.0bd (BAR DIAMETER) CENTER TO CENTER (C-C) SPACING (EQUAL OR MORE) 2.0bd. ALL OTHERS: COVER (EQUAL OR MORE) 1.0bd CENTER TO CENTER SPACING (EQUAL OR MORE) 3.0bd. 3. TOP BARS ARE DEFINED AS HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT SUCH THAT MORE THAN 12 INCHES OF FRESH CONCRETE IS CAST IN THE MEMBER BELOW THE DEVELOPMENT LENGTH OR SPLICE. 4. DEVELOPMENT AND SPLICE LENGTH SHOWN SHALL NOT APPLY IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OCCUR: A) f'c < 2,500 PSI B) fy > 60,000 PSI C) THE COVER OR C-C BAR SPACING IS NOT AS LISTED ABOVE D) THE REINFORCING STEEL IS EPOXY COATED E) LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE IS USED. 5. CENTER ON CENTER SPACING (S) IS DEFINED AS BELOW: HOOKED BAR 1. WHERE DRAWINGS ARE DETAILED SIMILAR TO DETAIL 2, EXTEND THE EMBEDMENT LENGTH SUCH THAT THE HOOKED BAR CONTACTS THE LAYER OF MAIN REINFORCING SHOWN. 2. EMBEDMENT LENGTHS IN CHART ARE TYPICAL EXCEPT AS NOTED IN DETAIL 2, OR AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. 12 x DIA. OF BAR CRITICAL SECTION TYPICAL REINFORCING NOTES 4'-3 4'-8" 5'-2" 1'-11" 3'-9" 3'-4" 2'-3" OTHER 1'-2" 1'-6" SPLICE LENGTH 2'-7" 1'-11" TOP 1'-6" 2'-0" OTHER 3'-10" 6'-4" 3'-2" 2'-11" 4'-3" 4'-11" 2'-6" 8'-8" 7'-11" 7'-2" 6'-1" 6'-8" 5'-6" 5'-7" 1'-7" 2'-0" TOP BAR #4 #3 SIZE DEVELOPMENT LENGTH 2'-11" 4'-3" 4'-11" 2'-6" 5'-6" 6'-8" 6'-1 #6 #8 #7 #5 #11 #10 #9 REINFORCING DEVELOPMENT AND SPLICES f'c = 4,000 PSI LENGTH OR 9" 7" 1'-0" MIN. EMBEDMENT BAR #5 #4 #3 SIZE 1'-4" 1'-9" 1'-6" 1'-2" 1'-11" 2'-1" #7 #9 #8 #6 #11 #10 HOOKED BARS (f'c = 4,000 PSI) DEVELOPMENT LENGTHS S1-0 1 3/4"=1'-0" HORIZONTAL WALL REINF. DETAILS DEVELOPMENT LENGTH NOTES: F. LIGHT GAUGE METAL 1. FOR NON-LOAD BEARING METAL STUDS AND CEILINGS SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THE FOLLOWING NOTES APPLY TO METAL STUDS INDICATED ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 2. ALL LIGHT GAUGE METAL FRAMING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISI "SPECIFICATIONS FOR DESIGN OF COLD FORMED STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS" 2015 EDITION. 3. ALL LIGHT GAUGE METAL FRAMING SHALL BE AS NOTED BELOW: INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR STUDS: GALVANIZED CONFORMING TO ASTM A123 COATING CLASS G60. 4. ALL LIGHT GAUGE METAL FRAMING SHALL CONFORM WITH THE FOLLOWING: GALVANIZED STUDS, JOISTS, TRACKS, END CLOSURES, BRIDGING, ACCESSORIES AND STRAPS (12, 14 AND 16 GAUGE): ASTM A653, GRADE 50, (Fy_min.= 50,000 psi, Fu_min.=65,000 psi) GALVANIZED STUDS,JOISTS,TRACKS, END CLOSURES, BRIDGING, ACCESSORIES AND STRAPS (18 AND 20 GAUGE): ASTM A653, GRADE 33, (Fy_min.= 33,000 psi, Fu_min.=45,000 psi) 5. DOUBLE VERTICAL STUDS SHALL BE FASTENED TOGETHER ON BOTH FLANGES WITH SHEET METAL SCREWS. 6. TOP & BOTTOM TRACKS SHALL BE SAME GAUGE AS WALL STUD OR 20 GA.MIN. WHICHEVER IS THICKER MATERIAL. 7. DOUBLE JOIST ARE BACK TO BACK U.N.O. 8. ALL LIGHT GAUGE FRAMING MEMBERS SHALL BE CEMCO. 9. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW. 10. ALL METAL STUDS AND JOISTS SHALL HAVE STIFFENED FLANGES. SEE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS ON CONNECTIONS, BRACING, BRIDGING, ETC. 11. CUT FRAMING COMPONENTS, SUCH AS BRACING, SQUARELY OR AT AN ANGLE TO FIT TIGHT AGAINST ABUTTING MEMBERS. HOLD MEMBERS FIRMLY IN POSITION UNTIL PROPERLY FASTENED. 12.ALL BEARING STUDS MUST BE FULLY ATTACHED TO THE WALL LEDGER. ALL STUDS SHALL BE SPACED AT SAME SPACING AS JOIST (IN LINE FRAMING). ALL BEARING STUDS, COLUMNS AND BUILT UP STUDS SHALL HAVE CONTINUOUS BEARING DOWN TO FOUNDATION U.N.O. SOLID BLOCKING AT FLOORS SHALL BE PROVIDED. 13.CUTTING FLANGES AND STIFFENER LIPS OF LOAD BEARING STUDS IS PROHIBITED, NO STUD NOTCHING IS PERMITTED IN BEARING WALLS U.N.O. 14.OPENING IN STUD/JOIST WEBS OTHER THAN THE STANDARD PUNCHOUTS BY MANUFACTURER ARE PROHIBITED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED AND DETAILED BY ENGINEER. NO PUNCHOUT SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN 24" OF THE SUPPORT OR POINT LOAD. 15.BRIDGING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL JOISTS @ 8'-0" O.C. MAX. 16.ATTACH STUDS USING PLUG, BUTT OR SEAM WELDS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WHERE STUDS ARE BURNED THROUGH BY WELDING, PROVIDE SUITABLE STITCH PLATE OF SAME GAUGE. SPLICES IN AXIAL LOADED STUDS OR BRACES ARE NOT PERMITTED. PROVIDE BUTT WELDS OR SPLICES AT JOINTS IN TRACK. WIRE TYING OF FRAMING COMPONENTS IS NOT PERMITTED. 17.ALL SHEET METAL SCREWS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH METAL FRAMING AND STRUCT. STEEL A MINIMUM OF 1/4" OR 3 EXPOSED THREADS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 18.ALL LIGHT METAL GAUGE TO METAL FASTENERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE DARTS BRAND SELF-DRILLING/SELF-TAPPING STEEL SCREWS AS MANUFACTURED BY COMPASS INTERNATIONAL COMPLYING WITH ICBO EVALUATION REPORT NO. ESR-5202 OR EQUAL. SCREWS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM EDGE DISTANCE OF 1/2" FASTENERS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: APPLICATION FASTENER LIGHT GAUGE 18 GA. OR 20 GA.-#8 MODIFIED TRUSS HEAD TRACK TO STUD 16 GA.-#10 PANCAKE HEAD ALL OTHER LIGHT GAUGE METAL 18 GA. OR 20 GA.-#8 WASHER HEAD TO LIGHT GAUGE METAL 16 GA.-#10 HEX WASHER HEAD CONNECTION ALL OTHER LIGHT GAUGE METAL #12 HEX WASHER HEAD TO STRUCTURAL STEEL < 1/2" THICK 19. ALL LIGHT GAUGE METAL TO STRUCTURAL STEEL (GREATER THAN 1/2" THICK) FASTENERS SHALL BE HILTI ENP2-21-L15 POWDER ACTUATED FASTENER ICC ESR REPORT 2197 OR EQUAL. G. LIGHT GAUGE WELDING 1.ALL WELDING SHALL BE IN STRICT CONFORMANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF ANSI/AWS D1.3. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WELDING PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION (WPS) FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO STARTING OF FABRICATION. THE SEQUENCE OF WELDING SHALL BE PLANNED TO MINIMIZE LOCKED IN STRESSES AND DISTORTION. 3.ALL WELDERS AND INSPECTORS SHALL BE INFORMED OF AND MUST ADHERE TO THE WPS AND SHALL RETAIN A COPY. 4.WELDING OF LIGHT GAUGE STEEL SHALL BE BY MANUAL SHIELD METAL ARC WELDING USING E-6012, E-6013 OR E-7014 RODS. 5.LENGTHS OF WELDS ARE EFFECTIVE LENGTHS. WHERE LENGTH OF WELD IS NOT SHOWN IT SHALL BE FULL LENGTH OF JOINT. ALL BUTT WELDS SHALL BE FULL PENETRATION UNLESS NOTES OTHERWISE. 6.ALL SHOP WELDS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A FABRICATOR APPROVED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. 7.WELDERS SHALL BE QUALIFIED FOR THE WORK THEY WILL BE DOING AND SHALL HAVE CERTIFICATIONS CURRENT. 8.FACES OF FILLET WELDS EXPOSED TO VIEW SHALL HAVE AS-WELDED SURFACES THAT ARE REASONABLY SMOOTH AND UNIFORM. NO FINISHING OR GRINDING SHALL BE REQUIRED, EXCEPT WHERE CLEARANCES OR FIT OF OTHER ITEMS MAY SO NECESSITATE. ALL 3"ALL CONCRETE EXPOSURE MEMBER REINFORCEMENT COVER REINFORCEMENT CAST AGAINST AND PERMANENTLY IN CONTACT WITH GROUND SPECIFIED COVER #6 TO #18 2" ALLEXPOSED TO WEATHER OR IN CONTACT WITH GROUND #5 AND SMALLER 1 1/2" NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR IN CONTACT WITH GROUND SLABS, JOISTS, & WALLS #14 & #18 1 1/2" #14 & SMALLER 3/4" BEAMS, COLUMNS, PEDASTALS, AND TENSION TIES PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT STIRRUPS, TIES, SPIRALS, AND HOOPS 1 1/2" H. SPECIAL INSPECTION 1. IN ACCORD WITH 2021 IBC SECTION 1704, AS NOTED BELOW, TESTING AND INSPECTION SHALL BE BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING/INSPECTION FIRM UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED ENGINEER EMPLOYED BY THAT FIRM. THIS ENGINEER SHALL BE DEEMED THE DESIGNATED ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR SPECIAL INSPECTIONS PERFORMED BY HIS FIRM OR HIS CONSULTANTS. INSPECTORS SHALL BE ICC CERTIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 2. THE DESIGNATED ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEFINING THE ACTIVITIES OF THE INSPECTORS, FOR CERTIFYING THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE INSPECTORS WITH THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND TO ATTEND THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING TO DEFINE THEIR SCOPE OF SERVICES AND THE TESTING OR TEST PROCEDURES THAT ARE REQUIRED AS OUTLINED IN THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. 3. SPECIAL INSPECTION IS TO BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION THE INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED BY THE LOCAL DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SAFETY AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO RELIEVE THE OWNER OR HIS AUTHORIZED AGENT FROM REQUESTING THE PERIODIC AND CALLED INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY SECTION 108.5 AND 108.7 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. 4. CONCRETE PER SECTION 1705.3 AND TABLE 1705.3. 5. ANCHOR RODS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE: PER TABLE 1705.3. 8. REINFORCING PER TABLE 1705.3 AND EXCEPTION FOR CONCRETE REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION. 9. STRUCTURAL MASONRY: PER SECTION 1705.4. 10. GRADING, EXCAVATION AND FILLING: PER SECTION 1705.6. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 11. EXPANSION BOLT, SCREW ANCHOR AND ADHESIVE ANCHOR INSTALLATION TO VERIFY INSTALLATION IN ACCORD WITH ICC REPORTS NOTED PREVIOUSLY OR APPROVED EQUAL. 12. THE INSPECTOR SHALL OBSERVE THE WORK ASSIGNED TO BE CERTAIN IT CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED DESIGN DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13. THE INSPECTOR SHALL FURNISH DAILY INSPECTION REPORTS ON THE WORK TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND TO THE ENGINEER. ALL DISCREPENCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR CORRECTION, AND, IF UNCORRECTED, TO THE ENGINEER AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 14. THE TESTING/ INSPECTION FIRMS ENGINEER SHALL COMPLETE, SIGN AND SEAL, A FINAL REPORT CERTIFYING THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE, THE WORK IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 1 GENERAL NOTES S1-0 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ENGINEER OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ p e w a l z \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 2 7 C 9 9 C o b b l e s t o n e F i r e s t o n e _ C E N T R A L _ p e w a l z . r v t 3/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 1 1 : 5 6 : 5 5 A M 1/8" = 1'-0" 2202.58 11.29.23 SLM TAS 385 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 190 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 (3 0 3 ) 7 2 1 - 3 3 2 2 39 9 P e r r y S t . , S u i t e 2 0 4 A - C a s t l e R o c k , C O 8 0 1 0 4 En g i n e e r i n g PE R F O R M A N C E (4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 0 F a x : ( 4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 1 11 8 1 1 F o r t S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 4 - O m a h a , N E 6 8 1 6 4 PE # : NE - C A 2 4 5 5 22 1 0 1 5 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 1 5/24/2024 Plan Review Comments 5/24/2024 Exhibit R - Page 53 of 81 1 D C B A 2 3 4 5 6 9' - 4 " 40 ' - 8 " 4' - 0 " AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 RESTROOM 104 54 ' - 0 " 3'-4"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"2'-8"6'-6"4'-4"6'-6"2'-8"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 16'-0"16'-0"17'-4"16'-0"16'-0" 3'-4"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"2'-8"8'-4"4'-4"4'-8"2'-8"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 32'-0"17'-4"32'-0" 81'-4" SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SL O P E TO D R A I N SL O P E TO D R A I N -3" TYP. SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SL O P E TO D R A I N SL O P E TO D R A I N -3" TYP. SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SL O P E TO D R A I N SL O P E TO D R A I N -3" TYP. SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SL O P E TO D R A I N SL O P E TO D R A I N -3" TYP. SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN -2" TYP. OPEN TO ABOVE ABOVE CF-1 3 S3-0 CF-1 CF-1 CF - 2 CF - 1 CF - 1 WALL SYSTEM BEARS DIRECTLY ON CONTINUOUS FOOTING 8" CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL - SEE NOTE #4 1 S3-0 3 S3-0 CF-1 CF - 2 CF - 1 CF - 1 CF-1CF-1 CF-1 CF-1 CF-2 CF-2 1 S3-0 1 S3-0 1 S3-0 3 S3-0 3 S3-0 3 S3-0 4 S3-0 4 S3-05 S3-0 5 S3-0 2 S3-0 PRE-FABRICATED TRENCH DRAIN 2 S3-2 8" NOMINAL CMU WITH #5 @ 16" O.C. CENTERED IN WALL 2 S3-2 2 S3-2 6" CONCRETE SLAB W/ #4 @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY 1'-6"x3'-0" CONT. TRENCH FOOTING W/ 3-#5 TOP & BOTTOM & #4 TIES @ 16" O.C. FOUNDATION NOTES 1. TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION SHALL BE -2'-8" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. INDICATES CONCRETE WALLS WITH #5 VERTICAL BARS @ 1'-4" O.C. CENTERED IN CONCRETE WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. CONCRETE SLAB SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: - THE WASH BAYS SHALL BE 5". REINFORCE CONCRETE SLAB WITH #4 @ 16" O.C. EA. WAY CENTERED IN THE SLAB. - EQUIPMENT ROOM, OFFICE AREAS, AND MISCELLANEOUS WASH AREA SLABS SHALL BE A 4" CONCRETE SLAB ON PREPARED SUBGRADE AND REINFORCED WITH #4 @ 16" O.C. EA. WAY CENTERED IN THE SLAB. 4. TOP OF WALL SHALL BE -0'-8" AT WALL OPENINGS TO ALLOW THE FLOOR SLAB TO POUR OVER THE TOP. DOWELS EXTENDING FROM THE FOUNDATION INTO THE WALL SHALL MATCH THE SPACING OF THE VERTICAL WALL REINFORCEMENT. 5. PREPARE THE SOIL BENEATH THE SLAB AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT IN ACCORD WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SECTION "SITE GRADING AND EARTHWORK. ·THE REMOVAL OF 4 FT OF EXISTING FILL AND THE SUBGRADE BELOW NEW STRUCUTRAL FILL SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12", MOISTURE CONDITIONED AND COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRITERIA LISTED IN THE SOIL REPORT. ·FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON A MINIMUM OF 3 FT OF STRUCTURAL FILL MEETING THE MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE "SITE GRADING AND EARTHWORK" SECTION OF THE SOIL REPORT ·THIS LAYER SHALL MEET THE COMPACTION, MOISTURE, AND MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS STATED IN THE SOIL REPORT. 5. AN UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ·4" DIA. PERFORATED RIGID PVC PIPE. ·SLOPE SLAB SUBGRADE PER THE SOIL REPORT ·PROVIDE A GEOMEMBRANE UNDER THE 6" GRAVEL DRAINAGE LAYER. THE GEOMEMBRANE SHALL BE CHEMICALLY OR MECHANICALLY ADHERED TO THE FOUNDATION WALLS ·PROVIDE A PERIMETER DRAIN ABOVE THE GEOMEMBRANE. ·DRAIN PIPES SHALL SLOPE TO TO SUMP(S) WHERE WATER CAB BE REMOVED BY PUMPING OR GRAVITY DRAINAGE. 6. COORDINATE AND CONFIRM ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. FOUNDATION PLAN S2-0 1/4" = 1'-0"S2-0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ENGINEER OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ p e w a l z \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 2 7 C 9 9 C o b b l e s t o n e F i r e s t o n e _ C E N T R A L _ p e w a l z . r v t 3/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 1 1 : 5 6 : 5 5 A M 1/8" = 1'-0" 2202.58 11.29.23 SLM TAS 385 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 190 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 (3 0 3 ) 7 2 1 - 3 3 2 2 39 9 P e r r y S t . , S u i t e 2 0 4 A - C a s t l e R o c k , C O 8 0 1 0 4 En g i n e e r i n g PE R F O R M A N C E (4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 0 F a x : ( 4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 1 11 8 1 1 F o r t S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 4 - O m a h a , N E 6 8 1 6 4 PE # : NE - C A 2 4 5 5 22 1 0 1 5 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 1 5/24/2024 Plan Review Comments MARK FOUNDATION SCHEDULE SIZE 3-#5 CONT. & #5 @ 12" O.C TRANSVERSE REINFORCING CF-1 CONT.x1'-4"x1'-0" 3-#5 CONT. & #5 @ 12" O.C TRANSVERSECF-2 CONT.x2'-4"x1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0"S2-0 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN2 5/24/2024 Exhibit R - Page 54 of 81 1 D C B A 2 3 4 5 6 9' - 4 " 40 ' - 8 " 4' - 0 " AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 RESTROOM 104 54 ' - 0 " 3'-4"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"2'-8"6'-6"4'-4"6'-6"2'-8"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 16'-0"16'-0"17'-4"16'-0"16'-0" 3'-4"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"2'-8"8'-4"4'-4"4'-8"2'-8"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 32'-0"17'-4"32'-0" 81'-4" 1" / 1 ' - 0 " 1/2" / 1'-0" 1/2" / 1'-0" 1" / 1 ' - 0 " 5'-4" 10 ' - 0 " 5'-4" 4' - 8 " W8x21 (VARIES) W8x21 (VARIES) CH CH CHCH CH CH (2) 800S162-97 BOX BEAM W8x21 (VARIES) 1 S3-1 2 S3-1 8 S3-1 4 S3-1 5 S3-1 CH CH (2) 800S162-97 BOX BEAM(2) 800S162-97 BOX BEAM 9 S3-1 (2) 800S162-97 BOX BEAM 4 S3-1 8 S3-1 2 S3-1 7 S3-1 9 S3-1 CH CH CH CH 2 S3-1 2 S3-1 3 S3-1 BLOCKING AT MIDSPAN BLOCKING AT MIDSPAN BLOCKING AT MIDSPAN BLOCKING AT MIDSPAN BLOCKING AT MIDSPAN 3 S3-1 7 S3-17 S3-1 7 S3-1 8 S3-1 11 S3-1 LOW 11 S3-1 LOW 5 S3-1 1. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 2. COLD FORMED STEEL FRAMING USED IN THIS SET OF STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE IDENTIFIED BY THE SSMA IDENTIFICATION CODE THE CODES ARE FORMED BY CONCATENATING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 3. ALL STEEL STUDS AND COLD FORMED STEEL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM G90 COATING. ALL HARDWARE AND FASTENERS USED FOR STEEL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL OR HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. ALL COLD FORMED STEEL USED FOR FLOOR AND ROOF FRAMING SHALL BE UN-PUNCHED. 4. CH INDICATES CONCRETE HEADER. PROVIDE 2-#5 AT BOTTOM OF CONCRETE HEADER. 5. UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED, CONNECTION FOR ITEMS HUNG FROM JOISTS (FANS, HEATERS, GARAGE DOOR, PIPING, ETC.) SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THEIR RESPECTIVE TRADES. 6. FASTEN R-PANEL x 22 GA. TO STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS AND PERIMETER ANGLES/BENT PLATES IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: -#12 STRUCTURAL FASTENERS AT 6" O.C. -1/4-14x7 8" SIDELAP FASTENERS @ 12" O.C. LAPS FOR DECKING SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 33- 20ga. 43- 18ga. 54- 16ga. 68- 14ga. 97- 12ga. MEMBER DEPTH IN 1/100 INCHES (6" STUD) MEMBER TYPE: (S = STUD, T = TRACK) FLANGE WIDTH IN 1/100 INCHES (1 5/8" = 1.625) MATERIAL THICKNESS IN MILS 68162S600 ROOF FRAMING PLAN S2-1 1/4" = 1'-0"S2-1 ROOF FRAMING PLAN1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ENGINEER OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ p e w a l z \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 2 7 C 9 9 C o b b l e s t o n e F i r e s t o n e _ C E N T R A L _ p e w a l z . r v t 3/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 1 1 : 5 6 : 5 5 A M 1/8" = 1'-0" 2202.58 11.29.23 SLM TAS 385 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 190 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 (3 0 3 ) 7 2 1 - 3 3 2 2 39 9 P e r r y S t . , S u i t e 2 0 4 A - C a s t l e R o c k , C O 8 0 1 0 4 En g i n e e r i n g PE R F O R M A N C E (4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 0 F a x : ( 4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 1 11 8 1 1 F o r t S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 4 - O m a h a , N E 6 8 1 6 4 PE # : NE - C A 2 4 5 5 22 1 0 1 5 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 1 5/24/2024 Plan Review Comments 5/24/2024 Exhibit R - Page 55 of 81 1 D C B A 2 3 4 5 6 9' - 4 " 40 ' - 8 " 4' - 0 " AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 RESTROOM 104 54 ' - 0 " 3'-4"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"2'-8"6'-6"4'-4"6'-6"2'-8"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 16'-0"16'-0"17'-4"16'-0"16'-0" 3'-4"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"2'-8"8'-4"4'-4"4'-8"2'-8"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 32'-0"17'-4"32'-0" 81'-4" W8x18 9 S3-0 8 S3-0 8 S3-0 7 S3-0 10 S3-0 1. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 2. COLD FORMED STEEL FRAMING USED IN THIS SET OF STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE IDENTIFIED BY THE SSMA IDENTIFICATION CODE THE CODES ARE FORMED BY CONCATENATING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 3. ALL STEEL STUDS AND COLD FORMED STEEL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM G90 COATING. ALL HARDWARE AND FASTENERS USED FOR STEEL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL OR HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. ALL COLD FORMED STEEL USED FOR FLOOR AND ROOF FRAMING SHALL BE UN-PUNCHED. 4. CH INDICATES CONCRETE HEADER. PROVIDE 2-#5 AT BOTTOM OF CONCRETE HEADER. 5. UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED, CONNECTION FOR ITEMS HUNG FROM JOISTS (FANS, HEATERS, GARAGE DOOR, PIPING, ETC.) SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THEIR RESPECTIVE TRADES. 6. FASTEN R-PANEL x 22 GA. TO STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS AND PERIMETER ANGLES/BENT PLATES IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: -#12 STRUCTURAL FASTENERS AT 6" O.C. -1/4-14x7 8" SIDELAP FASTENERS @ 12" O.C. LAPS FOR DECKING SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S 33- 20ga. 43- 18ga. 54- 16ga. 68- 14ga. 97- 12ga. MEMBER DEPTH IN 1/100 INCHES (6" STUD) MEMBER TYPE: (S = STUD, T = TRACK) FLANGE WIDTH IN 1/100 INCHES (1 5/8" = 1.625) MATERIAL THICKNESS IN MILS 68162S600 PLATFORM FRAMING PLAN S2-2 1/4" = 1'-0"S2-1 PLATFORM FRAMING PLAN1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ENGINEER OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ p e w a l z \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 2 7 C 9 9 C o b b l e s t o n e F i r e s t o n e _ C E N T R A L _ p e w a l z . r v t 3/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 1 1 : 5 6 : 5 5 A M 1/8" = 1'-0" 2202.58 11.29.23 SLM TAS 385 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 190 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 (3 0 3 ) 7 2 1 - 3 3 2 2 39 9 P e r r y S t . , S u i t e 2 0 4 A - C a s t l e R o c k , C O 8 0 1 0 4 En g i n e e r i n g PE R F O R M A N C E (4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 0 F a x : ( 4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 1 11 8 1 1 F o r t S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 4 - O m a h a , N E 6 8 1 6 4 PE # : NE - C A 2 4 5 5 22 1 0 1 5 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 1 5/24/2024 Plan Review Comments 5/24/2024 Exhibit R - Page 56 of 81 TYP. MASONRY WALL REINF. SPLICE & PLACEMENT 3/4" = 1'-0"S3-0 11 S3-0 7 3/4" = 1'-0" PLATFORM CONNECTION S3-0 8 3/4" = 1'-0" PLATFORM CONNECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" PLATFORM SECTION TRENCH DRAINCONT. FOOTING @ WALL FOOTING AT WALL OPENING S3-0 1 S3-0 2 S3-0 3 FOUNDATION SECTION 3/4"=1'-0"S3-0 4 FOUNDATION SECTION 3/4"=1'-0"S3-0 5 3/4"=1'-0" LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION S3-0 6 S3-0 9 2-#3 TIES BOND BEAM W/ 2- #5 (CONT.) PL 3/4"x6"x8" BEARING PLATE W/ 3-5/8" dia. x 8" LONG HEADED STUDS W BEAM (SEE PLAN) 1" NON-SHRINK GROUT 3/8" PARTIAL HEIGHT STIFFENER 3/4" = 1'-0" PLATFORM SECTION S3-0 10 1 1 8" STURD-I-FLOOR SHEATHING B A TYP. MASONRY WALL REINF. POSITION 3/4" = 1'-0"S3-0 12 SECTIONS AND DETAILS S3-0 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ENGINEER OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ p e w a l z \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 2 7 C 9 9 C o b b l e s t o n e F i r e s t o n e _ C E N T R A L _ p e w a l z . r v t 3/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 1 1 : 5 6 : 5 5 A M 1/8" = 1'-0" 2202.58 11.29.23 SLM TAS 385 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 190 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 (3 0 3 ) 7 2 1 - 3 3 2 2 39 9 P e r r y S t . , S u i t e 2 0 4 A - C a s t l e R o c k , C O 8 0 1 0 4 En g i n e e r i n g PE R F O R M A N C E (4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 0 F a x : ( 4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 1 11 8 1 1 F o r t S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 4 - O m a h a , N E 6 8 1 6 4 PE # : NE - C A 2 4 5 5 22 1 0 1 5 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 1 5/24/2024 Plan Review Comments 5/24/2024 Exhibit R - Page 57 of 81 S3-1 10 ROOF CONNECTION S3-1 9 3/4" = 1'-0" ROOF CONNECTION 10 S3-1 S3-1 2 3/4" = 1'-0" ROOF CONNECTION HSS4x4x1/4 W8 BEAM S3-1 5 3/4" = 1'-0" ROOF CONNECTION 2-#3 TIES PL 5/8"x6"x8" BEARING PLATE W/ 2-5/8" dia. x 8" LONG HEADED STUDS W BEAM (SEE PLAN) NON-SHRINK GROUT AT 3/8" PARTIAL HEIGHT STIFFENER L3x3x14 CONT. 1.5B ROOF DECK SEE PLAN NOTES FOR FASTENING TO STRUCTURE CONTINUOUS L3x3x1/4 ANGLE ANCHORED TO CONCRETE WALL WITH 5/8" DIA. SIMPSON TITEN HD ANCHORS @ 4'-0" O.C. 8" PURLIN - SEE PLAN FOR SIZE S3-1 4 ROOF CONNECTION S3-1 7 3/4" = 1'-0" FRAMING SECTION 2- #5 CONT. @ TOP OF WALL PROVIDE 16 GA. SOLID BRIDGING AT MIDSPAN OF JOIST LENGTH. 3/S3-1 FOR CONNECTION OF BRIDGING TO WALL. INSTALL S/LTT STRAP AS SHOWN 1.5B ROOF DECK DECK BEARING EL. VARIES FASTEN BEAM TO ANGLE W/ 1 4" DIA. SELF TAPPING SCREWS @ 12" O.C.. BOX BEAM L8x4x1/2xCONT. W/ 5/8" DIA. SIMPSON TITEN HD (STAINLESS STEEL) ANCHOR @ 32" O.C. EMBED 4 1 2" ROOF JOIST, SEE PLAN 8" CONCRETE WALL 350T150-68 (TRACK) TOP & BOTTOM 800S162-68 #12 SCREWS @ 6" O.C. S3-1 1 3/4" = 1'-0" ROOF CONNECTION METAL DECK SEE 2/S3-1 FOR CONNECTION ROOF DECKING T.O. PARAPET EL. SEE ARCH. DECK BEARING EL. VARIES PROVIDE 2-#5 AT DIAPHRAGM CONNECTION FASTEN BEAM TO ANGLE W/ 14" DIA. SELF TAPPING SCREWS @ 12" O.C.. BOX BEAM L8x4x12 BETWEEN W8 BEAMS. FASTEN TO WALL W/ 5/8" DIA. SIMPSON TITEN HD (STAINLESS STEEL) ANCHOR @ 32" O.C. EMBED 4 12" ROOF JOIST,SEE PLAN 8" CONCRETE WALL 350T150-68 (TRACK) TOP & BOTTOM 800S162-68 #12 SCREWS @ 6" O.C. 1.5B ROOF DECK S3-1 8 3/4" = 1'-0" ROOF CONNECTION PROVIDE SOLID BRIDGING AT MID SPAN - SEE 7/S3-1 PURLIN - SEE PLAN FOR SIZE & SPACING METAL DECKING DECK BEARING EL. VARIES 2-#5 CONT. AT DIAPHRAGM CONNECTION 800T150-97 CONT WITH 3/4" DIA. SIMPSON TITEN HD ANCHORS AT 24" O.C. EMBED 5 12" ROOF SLOPES PARALLEL TO WALL AT SIMILAR CONDITION 8" CONCRETE WALL 1.5B ROOF DECK SEE PLAN NOTES FOR FASTENING TO STRUCTURE 2-#5 SLOPE WITH ROOF CONTINUOUS L3x3x1/4 ANGLE ANCHORED TO CONCRETE WALL WITH 5/8" DIA. SIMPSON TITEN HD ANCHORS (STAINLESS STEEL) @ 4'-0" O.C. 8" PURLIN - SEE PLAN FOR SIZE SIMPSON L50 AT EACH END CONTINUOUS L3x2x38 ANGLE ANCHORED TO CONCRETE WALL WITH 3/4" DIA. SIMPSON TITEN HD ANCHORS AT 24" O.C. EMBED 5 1 2" 800T150-97 STUD TRACK ANCHORED TO WALL WITH (2) 1 4" DIA. SIMPSON TITEN SCREWS x 2 1 4" AT 16" O.C. 3/4" = 1'-0" S3-1 6 BEAM BEARING 3/4" = 1'-0" SIMPSON S/LTT20 AT BRIDGING LOCATIONS, ANCHOR TO WALL WITH 12" DIA. SIMPSON TITEN HD (STAINLESS STEEL), EMBED 3 1 2". CAN BE PLACED ON THE BOTTOM FLANGE OF JOIST 8" CONCRETE WALL S3-1 11 3/4" = 1'-0" TYP. AWNING DETAIL AT CONCRETE WALL #3 TIES @ 3" O.C. BOND BEAM W/ 2- #6 TOP & BOTTOM PL 3/4"x6"x8" BEARING PLATE W/ 3-5/8" dia. x 8" LONG HEADED STUDS W BEAM (SEE PLAN) 3/8" PARTIAL HEIGHT STIFFENER S3-1 3 BEAM BEARING 3/4" = 1'-0" MAIN WALL REINFORCEMENT 2-#5 TOP REINFORCEMENT 2-#6 BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT #3 STIRRUPS @ 6" O.C. ENTIRE LENGTH OF OPENING PL 5/8"x6"x8" BEARING PLATE W/ 2-5/8" dia. x 8" LONG HEADED STUDS 3/8" PARTIAL HEIGHT STIFFENER 3B S3-1 3B 6 S3-1 2- #5 CONT. @ TOP OF WALL 2- #5 CONT. @ TOP OF WALL 2- #5 CONT. @ TOP OF WALL 2-#5 AT DIAPHRAGM CONNECTION 800S162-68 TO CONNECT TO BLOCKING MEMBERS WITH 6-#12 SCREWS 4x7x 14 GA. BENT PLATE WITH 4-#12 SCREWS TO 8" MEMBER FASTEN TO WALL WITH 5 8" DIA. SIMPSON TITEN HD, EMBED 4 12" 2-#5 AT DIAPHRAGM CONNECTION 2-#5 AT DIAPHRAGM CONNECTION 2-#5 AT DIAPHRAGM CONNECTION SECTIONS AND DETAILS S3-1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ENGINEER OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ p e w a l z \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 2 7 C 9 9 C o b b l e s t o n e F i r e s t o n e _ C E N T R A L _ p e w a l z . r v t 3/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 1 1 : 5 6 : 5 5 A M 1/8" = 1'-0" 2202.58 11.29.23 SLM TAS 385 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 190 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 (3 0 3 ) 7 2 1 - 3 3 2 2 39 9 P e r r y S t . , S u i t e 2 0 4 A - C a s t l e R o c k , C O 8 0 1 0 4 En g i n e e r i n g PE R F O R M A N C E (4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 0 F a x : ( 4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 1 11 8 1 1 F o r t S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 4 - O m a h a , N E 6 8 1 6 4 PE # : NE - C A 2 4 5 5 22 1 0 1 5 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 1 5/24/2024 Plan Review Comments 5/24/2024 Exhibit R - Page 58 of 81 1 2 3 4 5 6 S3-2 1 3/4" = 1'-0" TYP. CONCRETE WALL REINFORCEMENT TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION (3) #5 HORIZONTAL BARS TOP & BOTTOM #4 TIES @ 16" O.C. #4 BENT DOWELS @ 16" O.C. 6" CONCRETE SLAB WITH #4 @ 12" O.C. E.W. 2' 3' COORDINATE FINAL GRADING PLAN & SLAB ELEVATION WITH CIVIL & ARCHITECTURAL PLANS S3-2 2 3/4" = 1'-0" SECTIONS AND DETAILS S3-2 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ENGINEER OF RECORD C: \ U s e r s \ p e w a l z \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 0 2 . 2 7 C 9 9 C o b b l e s t o n e F i r e s t o n e _ C E N T R A L _ p e w a l z . r v t 3/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 1 1 : 5 6 : 5 5 A M 1/8" = 1'-0" 2202.58 11.29.23 SLM TAS 385 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 190 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 (3 0 3 ) 7 2 1 - 3 3 2 2 39 9 P e r r y S t . , S u i t e 2 0 4 A - C a s t l e R o c k , C O 8 0 1 0 4 En g i n e e r i n g PE R F O R M A N C E (4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 0 F a x : ( 4 0 2 ) 3 4 3 - 3 9 6 1 11 8 1 1 F o r t S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 4 - O m a h a , N E 6 8 1 6 4 PE # : NE - C A 2 4 5 5 22 1 0 1 5 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 1 5/24/2024 Plan Review Comments 5/24/2024 Exhibit R - Page 59 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com MECHANICAL COVER SHEET M0-1 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 60 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS M0-2 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 61 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com MECHANICAL SCHEDULES M0-3 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 62 of 81 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 RESTROOM 104 B B OPEN TO ABOVE F A.F.F. CA-2 8' - 0" F D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 N 1/4" = 1'-0"M1-1 MECHANICAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com MECHANICAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN M1-1 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 63 of 81 D A 3 43434 MECHANICAL EQUIP. PLATFORM PLAN M1-2 1/4" = 1'-0"M1-2 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN1 N SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 64 of 81 1 2 3 4 5 D C B A MECHANICAL ROOF PLAN M1-3 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com 1/4" = 1'-0"M1-3 MECHANICAL ROOF PLAN1 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 65 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com PLUMBING COVER SHEET P0-1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 66 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com PLUMBING SCHEDULES P0-2 · · · · · · · · · · · 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 67 of 81 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 RESTROOM 104 1 D C B A 2 3 4 5 6 N 1/4" = 1'-0"P1-1 PLUMBING FIRST FLOOR PLAN1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com PLUMBING FIRST FLOOR PLAN P1-1 · · 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 68 of 81 D A 3 43434 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN P1-2 1/4" = 1'-0"P1-2 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT PLATFORM FLOOR PLAN1 N SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 69 of 81 1 D C B A 2 3 4 5 6 PLUMBING ROOF PLAN P1-3 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com 1/4" = 1'-0"P1-3 PLUMBING ROOF PLAN1 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 70 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com PLUMBING DETAILS P2-1 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 71 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com PLUMBING ISOMETRICS P2-2 Not to ScaleP2-2 3 Piping Diagram - West Wall (Shown for Reference Only) Not to ScaleP2-2 1 Waste and Vent Isometric Not to ScaleP2-2 2 Piping Diagram - Automatic Wall (Shown for Reference Only) 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 72 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com ELECTRICAL COVER SHEET E0-1 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 73 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com C G 3 4 OS TO D P A a E0-2 ELECTRICAL LEGEND 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 74 of 81 M TRANS WEST 44TH AVENUE PROPOSED BUILDING PB PB SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN E1-0 1" = 10'-0"E1-0 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN1 N 3' - 0 " SE E P H O T O M E T R I C PL A N REFER TO STRUCT. RE F E R T O S T R U C T . 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 75 of 81 1 2 3 4 5 6 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 RESTROOM 104 F A.F.F. CA-2 8' - 0" F 54 ' - 0 " D C B A 3' - 0 " 40 ' - 8 " 3' - 0 " N 1/4" = 1'-0"E1-1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN E1-1 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 76 of 81 D A 3 4 OPEN TO BELOW PLYWOOD LID AT RESTROOM, PAINT DN 3 4 DN OPEN TO BELOW 3 4 N SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com ELECTRICAL LIGHTING EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN E1-2 1/4" = 1'-0"E1-2 1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 77 of 81 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 106 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 101 EQUIPMENT ROOM 103 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 105 AUTOMATIC WASH BAY 102 RESTROOM 104 1 2 3 4 5 6 54 ' - 0 " D C B A N 1/4" = 1'-0"E2-1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN1 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN E2-1 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 78 of 81 D A 3 4 OPEN TO BELOW PLYWOOD LID AT RESTROOM, PAINT A DN A C CC C 3 4 102 103 108 108 106 107 104 105 105 104 104 105 105 104 103 DN OPEN TO BELOW A A 123 3 4 ’ SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com ELECTRICAL POWER EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN E2-2 3/16" = 1'-0"E2-2 1 ELECTRICAL POWER EQUIPMENT PLATFORM PLAN N 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 79 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE & SCHEDULES E3-1 NTSE3-1 1 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 80 of 81 SHEET PROJECT NUMBER THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOVER ARCHITECTURE. COPYRIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED AND PROSECUTED. C O P Y R I G H T N O T I C E CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: REV/DATE/COMMENTS ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS NOTED 2202.58 AU T O W A S H L A K E S I D E 59 0 0 W 4 4 T H A V E WH E A T R I D G E , C O 8 0 2 1 2 03.12.2024 JCB JCB 383 INVERNESS PKWY, STE 175 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 (720) 773-2800 1415 Park Ave. W., Denver, CO 80205 p 303.357.1998 3consultingengineers.com ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES & COM-CHECK F2 X1 EXIT LIGHT LED 1.3 SURE-LITES APXH7R2UNV EM EMERGENCY LIGHT LED 3.2 SURE-LITES APELUNV 8' LED TUBE LIGHT LED 120F1 CAR WASH BAY LIGHT LED 120 50 G&G INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING WPX8-SO X2 EXTERIOR EMERGENCY LIGHT LED UNV 14 SURE-LITES SE L W 25 BK AA EXTERIOR WALL PACK LED UNV 33.7 MCGRAW EDISON DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION LAMPS VOLTAGE TOTAL VA MANUFACTURER MOUNTING REMARKS DESIGN BASIS OTHERS QTY.TYPE NAME CATALOG SERIES TYPE DEPTH ISW-AF-1000-LED-E1- T4FT F3 LED 120 E3-2 LDS6B 20 1DE010W2N2050 VIAWETS-PYC-PMO- LED 80 750 40 8 120 D1 GSM TF XX LUMENWERX67 6" RECESSED DOWNLIGHT PORTFOLIO21.2 EU6B 1020 1015W2N902050 6LBS LI POLE LIGHT LED UNV MCGRAW EDISON44 COOPER - GLEON-SA1B-740-U T4FT BB CC CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE POLE LIGHT LED UNV CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE59.0DD CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LED 120 LDS6B 20 1DE010W2N20506" RECESSED DOWNLIGHT PORTFOLIO21.2 EU6B 1020 1020W2N902050 6LBS LI F4 6' LED TUBE LIGHT LED 120 VIAWETS-PYC-PMO- LED 80 750 40 6 120 D1 GSM TF XX LUMENWERX54 2024-03-12 Exhibit R - Page 81 of 81 September 19, 2025 Erin Dreeszen Founder, Chief of Staff Autowash Companies 9525 E 40thth Ave #110 Denver, CO 8023838 Re:Autowash –Wheat Ridge Acoustical Report Wave #3441 Dear Erin, We measured ambient sound levels at the Autowash atat 5900 W. 44thth Avenue in Wheat Ridge, from July 14 to July 16, 2025. We also measured sound levels at various points around the property and in the neighborhood on July 14 while carwash equipment was operating. The purpose of the measurements was to determine the existing carwash operating noise levels and the ambient noise levels in the area. We used the data from equipment operation to build a noise model of the existing conditions and to evaluate potential mitigation measures to reduce noise and meet the City of Wheat Ridge noise limit. Our comments and recommendations are made with respect to meeting acoustical objectives only. They may have implications on compliance with other zoning regulations (i.e., fence heights). If we need to make adjustments to meet other code requirements or zoning regulations, we will work with you to do so. Wheat Ridge Noise Criteria The Notice of Violation for Case No. 25-1878 from the City of Wheat Ridge states that the applicable noise limits for the carwash property are 65 dBA from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and 60 dBA from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. We measured noise around the Autowash premises, along the south property line, and in the neighborhood with various pieces of carwash equipment running.We also measured the ambient noise level at the southeast corner of your site for 24 hours,for comparison.This should be representative of ambient noise levels in the area. Exhibit S - Page 1 of 9 Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 2 Equipment The following test equipment was used. Long-term –unattended Larson Davis Model 831C sound level meter S/N 10640, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 058373 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 310349 Sierra Wireless Airlink RV50 cellular modem Larson Davis EPS2116 Environmental Shroud, windscreen and bike spike OnOn-site –handheld Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0002878, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 023893 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 314955 AND Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0001119, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 026106 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 138652 Larson Davis CAL200 acoustic calibrator, S/N 11780 The sound meter calibration was checked before and after the measurements. Measurement Procedures Long-term –unattended A meter was set up along the property line at the southeast corner of the property, near the carwash entrance from Gray Street. The meter ran from Monday night, July 14, 2025, to Wednesday morning, July 16, 2025.The measurement location is M6 shown in green on Figure 1 below. The (LEQEQ) is the Equivalent Sound Level is the average level during the hour. The L9090 is the 90 percentile sound level. It is the sound level that is exceeded 90% of the time. It can be thought of as the sound level during lulls in traffic and other sound “events.” The measured sound levels are shown in Table 1. Exhibit S - Page 2 of 9 Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 3 Table 1: Hourly measured sound level –long-term Location M6M6 –July 15 Hour LEQEQ (dBA) L9090 (dBA)Hour LEQEQ (dBA) L9090 (dBA) 12:00 AM 4747 4040 12:00 PM 5858 5353 1:00 AM 4646 4040 1:00 PM 6262 5454 2:00 AM 4545 4040 2:00 PM 5757 5555 3:00 AM 4444 4040 3:00 PM 5858 5555 4:00 AM 4949 4444 4:00 PM 5757 5454 5:00 AM 5454 5151 5:00 PM 5656 5151 6:00 AM 5858 5353 6:00 PM 5757 4848 7:00 AM 5757 5353 7:00 PM 5555 5050 8:00 AM 5757 5252 8:00 PM 5757 4949 9:00 AM 6060 5151 9:00 PM 6161*5959 10:00 AM 5656 5353 10:00 PM 5757 4747 11:00 AM 5757 5454 11:00 PM 4949 4343 * Peak cicada activity. The ambient noise in the area is predominantly from traffic on W.4444thth Avenue, N.Harlan Street, and other secondary streets. Noise from cicadas was significant at times. During the day, traffic noise is generally in the range of 55 –60 dBA. At night, the average sound level drops to 44 to 50 dBA. During lulls in traffic, the quietest times of the night are as low as 40 dBA. Exhibit S - Page 3 of 9 Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 4 Short-term –attended spot measurements Two Wave consultants visited the site on Monday, July 14 to measure the noise level of various Autowash noise sources around the property and in the neighborhood. Ambient measurements were taken at the south property line and in the neighborhood for comparison. The measurement locations are shown on Figure 1. Figure 1: Measurement locations We started by taking measurements just outside of the entry and exit doors of the east-most wash bay while a car ran through a full cycle to compare various cycle noise sources. Those results are shown in Table 2.The north exit door was open during the entire cycle. The south entry door closes after the car enters the carwash. The undercarriage wash occurs as the car enters the bay, so the door is open. W 44thth Ave Gr a y S t N H a r l a n S t M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 Key: Spot measurement –onon-site Spot measurement –neighborhood Long-term measurements –onon-site Exhibit S - Page 4 of 9 Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 5 Table 2: Autowash cycle measurements –East Bay Measurement Location Source Sound Level (dBA) N Wash Bay door (exit) Undercarriage wash – Dryers 9494 Middle of cycle 8383 S Wash Bay door (entry) Undercarriage wash 8282 Dryers 8686 Middle of cycle 6969 The dryers produced the loudest noise on both the north and south sides of the wash bay. The undercarriage wash was about 4 dB quieter than the dryers and itit only runs for about 8 seconds at a time.During the cycle, the south bay door was open as the car drove in (during the undercarriage wash), and was closed during the rest of the cycle. The north bay door was open during the entire cycle. We then moved on to spot measurements with the vacuums running and the dryers running. These results are shown in Table 3, with relevant ambient sound levels for comparison. It was difficult at times to measure the carwash equipment in the neighborhood, particularly the vacuums, due to traffic and other ambient noise in the area. When that is the case, the Autowash equipment noise cannot be accurately measured and the measured levels are a combination of the background sound and equipment sound. Exhibit S - Page 5 of 9 Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 6 Table 3: Measured sound levels –spot locations Event Source Measurement Location Equipment Sound Level (dBA) Reference Ambient Sound Level (dBA) Difference from Ambient 3 Vacuums M1: 3ʹ from S Vacuum 7979 –– M6M6: S Property Line –E corner 5454 5555 N/A M5: S Property Line –center 5959 5757 +2 dB M4M4: S Property Line –S of vacuums 6363 6262 +1 dB M7: 4380 Harlan –street edge 4848 4949 N/A M8: 4345 Gray St –street edge 6565 6666 N/A M9: 4325 Gray St –street edge 4646 4747 N/A 4 Dryers M2: 12ʹ N of E Wash Bay 9494 –– M3: 5ʹ S of E Wash Bay 8686 –– M6M6: S Property Line –E corner 6868 5555 +13 dB M5: S Property Line –center 7171 6666 +5 dB M4M4: S Property Line –S of vacuums 7070 6767 +3 dB M7: 4380 Harlan –street edge 5757 4949 +8 dB M8: 4345 Gray St –street edge 6868 6666 +2 dB M9: 4325 Gray St –street edge 5252 4747 +5 dB Cicada activity in one particular tree significantly increased the sound level near the southeast corner of the Autowash property and near 4345 Gray St during some measurements.As shown in Table 1, the peak cicada activity at this time of year took place around 9 PM. We were able to use these measured values to inform our model and predict the level for various operational and treatment scenarios. Predictive Sound Model We used Datakustic CadnaA noise prediction software to develop a 3D computer model to calculate noise levels from the Autowash property. The software takes into account sound that radiates from each noise source, the effect of the terrain, buildings, berms, barriers, and atmospheric conditions. The calculations are done according to the methodology of ISO Standard 9613-2: Acoustics –Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors, Part 2: General method of calculation. This is an international standard for predicting noise transmission Exhibit S - Page 6 of 9 Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 7 outdoors. The calculations assume downwind conditions in all directions. This is not possible in reality but gives more of a worst-case prediction. The measured sound levels around the perimeter of the carwash property and in the neighborhood were used to calibrate the model, and then the model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation measures.The sound level prediction locations are shown on Figure 2. Note that Locations 7, 8, and 9 are the same between the measurement and prediction figures. The other locations are unique. Figure 2: Prediction locations The measured carwash and vacuum noise levels were used for the sound sources in the model. The noise levels in Table 4 include all of the vacuums running simultaneously,and either two or four carwash bay dryers running (as indicated). It is unlikely that all of the vacuums will run simultaneously but this should represent the worst case. When the undercarriage wash or the W 44thth Ave Gr a y S t N H a r l a n S t P10 P11 P7P7 P9P9 P8P8 P12 Key: Predicted sound level location Autowash Exhibit S - Page 7 of 9 Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 8 washing cycle are occurring in any or all bays, the sound level will be lower than with the dryers running. Again, the model should represent the worst case since it only shows dryers running simultaneously. Table 4 shows the sound levels predicteded for two scenarios –with all four carwash bays operating simultaneously, and with only the two west bays operating. Table 4 includes the effect of a 6ʹ sound barrier along the south property line (where a wood fence exists currently). The sound barrier will run east west along the entire south property line. ItIt is on top of a slope so that its effective height is approximately 8′ above the carwash grade. The predicted sound levels do not include ambient noise from traffic or other noise sources in the area. Table 4: Predicted Sound Levels from Carwash Operations Prediction Location Predicted Sound Level (dBA) All 4 wash bays and all vacuums 2 west wash bays and all vacuums P7: 4380 Harlan –street edge 5656 5656 P8: 4345 Gray St –street edge 6060 5858 P9: 4325 Gray St –street edge 5555 5353 P1P10: 4355 Gray St. (back yard)6161 6060 P1P11: 4355 Gray St. (front yard)6262 6060 P1P12: 4350 Gray St. (NW prop. line)6161 5959 With all four bays operating, the sound levels in the front and backyard of 4355 Gray Street, behind the barrier, are reduced to 61 and 62 dBA, respectively. This meets the daytime noise limits but not the nighttime limits at the property line. All other locations at residences south of the carwash remain at or below 65 dBA. With only the two westernmost bays operating, the sound levels in the front and backyard of 4355 Gray Street, behind the barrier, are reduced to 60 and 60 dBA, respectively. This meets the daytime noise and nighttime limits at the south property line. All other locations at residences south of the carwash remain at or below 65 dBA. Exhibit S - Page 8 of 9 Erin Dreeszen September 19, 2025 Page 9 Summary Carwash equipment noise levels were measured and used to develop a 3D noise model. The model was then used to evaluate the effectiveness of a sound barrier on the south property line. A 6′ sound barrier on the 2′ slope (8′ effective height) can reduce noise levels from all four carwash bays operating to meet the Wheat Ridge daytime limit of 65 dBA at the south property line. If only the two westernmost bays operate, the barrier can reduce noise levels to meet the nighttime limit of 60 dBA at the south property line. The ambient sound levels were measured. During the day, traffic noise is generally in the range of 55 –60 dBA. At night, the average sound level drops to 44 to 50 dBA. During lulls in traffic, the quietest times of the night are as low as 40 dBA. There are many options for sound barrier materials. Common sound barrier materials are steel, aluminum, wood, masonry, and PVC. A rule of thumb is that the barrier should be to 2 to 4 pounds per square feet and be airtight. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this further. Sincerely, Jeff Kwolkoski, P.E., INCE Bd. Cert. Senior Acoustical Engineer Jeff Kwolkoski Digitally signed by Jeff Kwolkoski DN: C=US, E=jeffk@waveengineering.us, O=Wave Engineering, CN=Jeff KwolkoskiDate: 2025.09.19 14:04:40-06'00' Exhibit S - Page 9 of 9 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 24 March 2026 Ms. Lauren Mikulak, AICP Page 1 of 9 City of Wheatridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Voice: 303-235-2845 RE: Sound Level Measurement Results Lakeside Autowash EDI Job # C-4524 Dear Ms. Mikulak: Engineering Dynamic’s has completed sound level measurements of noise from Lakeside Autowash operations for Lakeside Autowash located at 5900 W 44th Ave. Results of the sound level measurements are described below. 1.0 Background 1.1 Measurement Locations In agreement with City of Wheatridge personnel sound levels of Autowash noise were measured at Locations as shown in Figures 1,1 and 1.2 and as follows, Locations A, D and G – along the property line between the Autowash and 4355 Gray St. (residential property). Location G was added by EDI to measure sound from vacuum operations. Location B – at the northwest corner of 4360 Gray St. (residential property). Location C – along the property line between the Autowash and W. 44th Ave. Location E – at the southeast corner of the apartment building property located at 4455 N. Harlans St. (residential property). Location F – at the northwest corner of the commercial property due east of the Autowash, 5892 W. 44th Ave. Location H – on north side of W. 44th Ave. directly north of Location C. Location I – on north side of W. 44th Ave. directly north of Location F. 1.2 Sound Level Measurement Dates Autowash sound level were measured on Tuesday 10-Mar-26 from ~4pm to 7:30pm, and Wednesday 18-Mar-26 from ~10pm to 11pm. During the measurement periods, approximately 50 car wash events were monitored. During the measurement periods there was vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., and Autowash noise levels were documented only when vehicle traffic noise would not artificially increase / affect Autowash noise levels. 1.3 Instrumentation Sound level measurements were made with a Larson Davis Type 1 Sound Level Analyzer. The Larson Davis Model 831 Sound Level Meter was field calibrated at the beginning of testing at 94.0 dB. At the completion of all testing the calibration level was checked, with a result of 94.0 dB. Exhibit T - Page 1 of 9 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 2 of 9 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Instrument Model # Serial # Calibration Date Calibration Due Date Larson Davis Real Time Analyzer Model 831 0004054 19-Jan-26 19-Jan-27 Larson Davis Acoustic Calibrator CAL 200 12548 19-Jan-26 19-Jan-27 1.4 State of Colorado Noise Law C.R.S. 25-12-103 The relevant portions of the State of Colorado Noise Law Section 25-12-103 are attached at the end of this report. CRS 25-12-103 has two interpretations, One – using the strict interpretation of Paragraph 1 and the noise limit table, Autowash noise levels can be 60 dBA 25-feet onto the adjacent properties from 7am to 7pm and 55 dBA 25-feet onto the adjacent properties from 7pm to 7am. In this case noise levels radiating FROM Commercial property INTO Residential property. Two – in practice many municipalities use the noise limits in the table as limits which can impinge ONTO the property Zone. In this case 55 dBA at the adjacent property line from 7am to 7pm and 50 dBA at the adjacent property line from 7pm to 7am. Additionally, none of the Zones in the table apply to noise impinging ONTO roadways. Therefore, are no applicable exceedance levels at Locations C and F. The 1.5 Noise Wall along Southern Autowash Property Line Figure 1.5 shows a picture of the “Noise Wall;” which has been installed along the property line between the Autowash and the residential property at 4355 Gray St. There is an elevation difference between the Autowash driveway grade and the yard elevation of the residence, of ~2-feet. The noise wall was installed at the residence yard grade and has a height of 6-feet above this grade and a height of ~8-feet above the Autowash driveway grade. 2.0 Sound Measurement Results Sound levels were measured for the following portions of a typical Autowash wash cycle, a. Initial vehicle entry into wash bay with pre-wash under carriage and vehicle spry. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building are open and Doors on the north side of the building are closed. b. Spray and Wash. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building and Doors on the north side of the building are closed. c. Drying Operations. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building and Doors on the north side of the building are open. Table 2.1 summarizes Autowash sound levels at each measurement location and for each wash cycle. Exhibit T - Page 2 of 9 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 3 of 9 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Table 2.1: Measurement Location Autowash Wash Cycle Portion, dBA Initial Spray Rinse and Wash Drying A 63 to 72 51 to 62 52 to 57 B 56 to 61 <50 to 61 <50 to 56 C <55 53 to 63 70 D1 68 to 70 57 to 63 50 to 54 D2 60 to 65 <50 to 58 <50 E <50 <50 <50 F <55 50 to 55 50 to 55 G 68 to 70 57 to 63 50 to 54 H1 <50 47 to 57 64 I1 <50 <50 <50 Notes: D1 = on Autowash side of noise wall. D2 = on Autowash side of noise wall. H1 = extrapolated from Location C noise levels. I1 = extrapolated from Location C noise levels. Inspection of Table 2.1 shows the following noise impacts from Autowash operations. Location A – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime residential noise limits. Location B – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime residential noise limits. Location C – sound levels from Autowash drying operations are clearly audible, however, noise from Autowash operations is below sound levels generated by vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., which are in the range of 70 to 85 dBA. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location D (Autowash side of noise fence) – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime residential noise limits. Location D (Residence side of noise fence) – Autowash noise levels are in the range of 5 to 8 dBA lower on the residence side of the noise wall, then on the Autowash side of the wall. While being lower Autowash initial spray operations still exceed the Daytime and Nighttime residential noise limits. Location D – vacuum operations (Autowash side of noise wall) are in the range of 55 to 62 dBA depending on the number of cars being vacuumed at one time. Location E – No audible sound impact from all Autowash operations. All car wash operations were less than 50 dBA. Exhibit T - Page 3 of 9 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 4 of 9 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Location F – sound levels from Autowash drying operations are clearly audible, however, noise from Autowash operations is below sound levels generated by vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., which are in the range of 70 to 85 dBA. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location G – vacuum operations are in the range of 58 to 65 dBA depending on the number of cars being vacuumed at one time. Location H – sound levels from Autowash drying operations will be clearly audible and extrapolated noise levels are below Commercial property noise limits. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location I – sound levels from Autowash drying operations will be clearly audible and extrapolated noise levels are below Commercial property noise limits. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. 3.0 Summary Noise impact from Autowash operations is limited to the residential buildings / properties directly south of the Autowash, specifically 4355 Gray St. and 4360 Gray St. For residences further south along Gray St. Autowash wash operations will still be audible, they are less than or nearly less than the Daytime and Nighttime residential noise limits. 4.0 Observation Visual inspection of the noise wall and as seen in Figure 1.5 shows, a. The noise wall height is insufficient to provide adequate Autowash operation sound attenuation. The noise wall should have been constructed at least 4-feet higher, so that from the Autowash vehicle entry doors the roof gutter of the residence at 4355 Gray St. is not visible from the Autowash. b. The noise wall construction is steel tubing with ¾-inch plywood / OSB and faux (plastic) bricks on the Autowash side. This construction is insufficient and cannot provide adequate sound attenuation of Autowash noise. If you have any questions, please contact me at our Englewood office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING DYNAMICS, INC. Stuart D. McGregor, P.E. President Exhibit T - Page 4 of 9 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 5 of 9 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Figure 1.1: Autowash Sound Level Measurement Locations A B C D E F G H I Exhibit T - Page 5 of 9 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 6 of 9 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Figure 1.2: Autowash Sound Level Measurement Locations G H I Exhibit T - Page 6 of 9 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 7 of 9 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Figure 1.5: Autowash Noise Wall Exhibit T - Page 7 of 9 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 8 of 9 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Exhibit T - Page 8 of 9 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 9 of 9 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Exhibit T - Page 9 of 9 1 From:Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent:Thursday, April 9, 2026 3:28 PM To:Peckler, John Cc:Gerald Dahl; Jana Easley; Dennis Dreeszen; Singleton, Evan; Erin Dreeszen; Jeff Kwolkoski Subject:[EXTERNAL] RE: Current Carwash Operations [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. Hi John, In the course of our review of the draft sound study, we had similar questions to the ones you raise in your April 3 email. We've requested corrections and clariﬁcations before ﬁnalizing the report. We'll be in touch next week. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 From: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 1:13 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com>; Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com>; Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com>; Jeff Kwolkoski <jeffk@waveengineering.us> Subject: RE: Current Carwash Operations Good afternoon, Lauren, I wanted to supplement my prior comments on the initial draft of the sound study for the carwash that was prepared by the City’s sound engineer now that Autowash’s sound engineer has reviewed the report. Autowash’s sound engineer also shared concerns about the noise standard used in the report (state noise statute vs. the City’s noise standard) and the identiﬁcation of the property located at 4355 Gray Street as residential. The following are Autowash’s additional comments on the initial draft of the City’s sound report. 1.The report does not describe the operational scenarios that were performed to obtain the range of readings for each cycle of the carwash. We understand that each wash is different, but the ranges are broad at certain of the testing locations. Therefore, we are unable to know what was happening operationally when the readings at the lower end of the range occurred versus what Caution:This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit U - Page 1 of 4 2 was happening when the readings at the higher end of the range occurred. For example, were all three bays operating at the exact same time to get the readings at the highest end of the range? Is the lower end of the range when only one or two bays are operating? Without a detailed description of how the tests were performed to support the variation in the reported ranges, Autowash cannot evaluate operational changes that might be beneﬁcial to reducing noise. 2.The report also doesn’t specify the duration of the sound generated by each cycle of the carwash. For example, the initial spray and undercarriage wash lasts about 8 seconds per wash. Is the peak of the range occurring for all 8 seconds, or is it only hit for 1 or 2 seconds? Again, this level of detail is critical for Autowash to evaluate any operational changes that might be beneﬁcial to reducing noise. 3.The report needs to be updated to clarify whether Locations A and G are on the Autowash property or not. 4.The report ﬁnds that the sound fence construction is inadequate and should’ve been 4’ taller, but the report does not provide any analysis or substantive evidence to support this ﬁnding. Moreover, the ﬁnding is based on the mistaken identiﬁcation of the property located at 4355 Gray Street as residential. The measurements in the report seem to support the conclusion that the sound fence is performing as intended and that is noted in the report where it states that readings on the 4355 Gray Street side of the fence are 5 – 8 dBA lower than on the Autowash side of the sound fence. Autowash asks that the City’s sound engineer reconsider its ﬁndings based on the appropriate classiﬁcation of the property at 4355 Gray Street and provide evidence or analysis to substantiate its ﬁndings on the adequacy of the sound fence. The Autowash team appreciates your attention to this matter and continues to look forward to working collaboratively with the City. If you think a call or meeting would be helpful, let me know and we can coordinate one. Best regards, John John Peckler Attorney Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 | Denver, CO 80203 O 303.839.3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com | spencerfane.com From: Peckler, John Sent: Friday, April 3, 2026 12:03 PM To: 'Lauren Mikulak' <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com>; Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com>; Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com> Subject: RE: Current Carwash Operations Good afternoon, Lauren, Thanks for sharing the draft report. Autowash has done a preliminary review and has the following overarching comments on the report that we wanted to share with the City. We’ve also sent the report to Autowash’s sound engineer, Jeff from Wave, so that he can provide comments as well. We will share any comments that we receive from Jeff as soon as they are available. Exhibit U - Page 2 of 4 3 1.The report mistakenly identiﬁes the property located at 4355 Gray Street as residential. This property is zoned commercial under the City’s zoning maps and is used for a commercial use—a veterinary clinic. Can you please have the sound consultant correct that misidentiﬁcation throughout the report? 2.The report mistakenly identiﬁes the property located at 4455 N. Harlan Street as residential. This property is zoned commercial under the City’s zoning maps. Can you please have the sound consultant correct that misidentiﬁcation throughout the report? 3.The report analyzes sound impacts against the State of Colorado standards at C.R.S. Section 25- 12-103 instead of the City’s noise standards that Autowash was initially cited under by code enforcement and that we’ve all been using throughout this process with City staff. Can you please explain why the state standard is now being applied? We believe that the City’s noise standards should continue to apply. 4.Can the sound engineer clarify where locations D1 and D2 are? We’re assuming that D1 is on the Autowash side of the sound fence and D2 is on the 4355 Gray St. side of the sound fence but that isn’t clearly laid out. 5.The analysis for Location A should be redone based on the applicable commercial limits because there are no residential properties at that location. The report should also clarify if Location A is on the Autowash side of the sound fence or the 4355 Gray St. side of the sound fence. 6.The analysis for Location D (presumably D1) should be redone based on the applicable commercial limits because this location is on the Autowash commercial property in front of the sound fence that was installed to reduce sound impacting the commercial property at 4355 Gray St. 7.The analysis for the second Location D (presumably D2) should be redone based on the applicable commercial limits because the report incorrectly identiﬁes the property located at 4355 Gray Street as residential. This property is zoned commercial under the City’s zoning maps and is used for a commercial use—a veterinary clinic. We look forward to conﬁning to work with the city to ensure that the carwash operations are consistent with all permits and city requirements. Have a nice Easter weekend. Best regards, John John Peckler Attorney Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 | Denver, CO 80203 O 303.839.3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com | spencerfane.com From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2026 4:52 PM To: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com>; Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com> Cc: Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com>; Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Current Carwash Operations Exhibit U - Page 3 of 4 4 [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. Autowash team, After our attempt at a coordinated test in late February, our sound consultant completed some passive measurements. He shared that report with us this afternoon. I am sharing it with you for your awareness. We have not yet reviewed the report ourselves and will follow up once we’ve had an opportunity to fully evaluate the ﬁndings and consider what conditions and next steps would be appropriate. Thank you, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 Exhibit U - Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT Reports: General report: Author: #18-1CS WEBB, BARBARA Narrative: Report time: 03/10/2025 10:10 Disclaimer: This report is a synopsis of this investigation and is not meant to provide a complete accounting of every detail or circumstance. This report may include information regarding officer perceptions that may not have been captured in associated body-worn camera (BWC) footage. To the best of my knowledge, BWC recordings of the events described in this report were conducted in accordance with CRS 24-31-902 and any lack of footage was not the result of intentional "tampering" as defined in CRS 24-31-901 (6). BWC was not activated or was muted in accordance with this statute including when necessary to avoid recording personal information that is not case related; when working on an unrelated assignment; when there is a long break in the incident; and in administrative, tactical, and management discussions when civilians were not present. BWC also may not have been activated when an interaction with the public was recorded by other means. BWC may not be activated in the specific circumstance of officers working in jail that has functioning video cameras except when jail peace officers are separately required to activate BWC for tasks requiring an anticipated use of force. TEXT: On 03-09-2025 at approximately 1527 hours I responded to 5900 W 44th Ave to follow up on a report of a noise disturbance. On 02-26-2025 I responded out to 5900 W 44th Ave, I observed the noise complaint for approximately 16.52 minutes from 11:14 to 11:33. I did not at this time observed any unusually loud noise, I observed one of the bays was in use during my observation. On 03-09-2025 I observed all four bays to be used but not consecutive. I observed cars going in at various times, recordings are with cars with various stages of the washing and drying cycle. I utilized the city of Wheat Ridge decibel reader for approximately 15 minutes with my body cam on. During this time I observed the readings from the decibel sound monitor to range from 61 decibels all the way to 85.4 decibels. Upon initiation I observed the decibel reading to be 77.5; depending on how many wash stalls were in use. I observed when tree stalls were in use in the various stages of the wash and dry cycle this being the three bays to the east the decibel readings went as high as 85.4. At one point no stalls were being utilized and the decibel reading was 62.0 while I was standing on the north/west side of the property located just south of the car wash. Approximately 15 ft from the property line. On 03-11-2025 I contacted the owner of the 24 hours car wash Si Dennis Dreeszen, I explained the reason for my call. Si Dennis stated he is working on a resolution and is having a team go out today to close the bay doors half way. He stated this should help mitigate the Exhibit V - Pue 1 of 19 noise. I asked Si Dennis if he could meet with the city to discuss some options for the noise violations. Si Dennis provided Friday the 14th @ 1130, Thurs March 20th he was open most of the day and Friday March 21st in the early afternoon. I stated to Si. Dennis I would follow up with him on what would work for a meeting time. On 03-11-2025 at approximately 1356 hours I responded to 4360 Gray St to meet with property owner RP/V1 Gretchen Mike Josten for a decibel reading from her property. Upon arrival I observed at the 24 hours car wash located at 5900 W 44th Ave a male party who was working on the bay doors. The male stated he was adjusting the doors to come down approximately 3/4 of the way, he stated they can not be shut all the way because the sensors will get misted over and shut down the car wash. I then responded to 4360 Gray St to take decibel readings from her front set back and her back yard with one bay running, door 3/4 closed and on vacuum running. I observed from the front setback the decibels ranged from 47 to 57, when the dryer from the one bay came on the readings jumped to 62.4, from the back yard the decibels registered at approximately 46-48 decibels. I then responded to 4355 Gray St as I approached the car was the readings climbed to 66 to 74 decibels with one bay running the dryer with door 3/4 closed. We then took a reading with just one vacuum running from the back yard (west side of property) of 4355 Gray St. Readings ranged from 53-57 approximately from the middle of the yard. I approached the fence line, now with one bay running, door 3/4 closed and a vacuum readings climbed to 63 decibels. I issued a notice of violation for 16-103 Unreasonable noise; disturbing the peace. I identified the owner as Si Autowash Lakeside via the Jefferson County Assessor page. I mailed the yellow copy of the notice of violation to Si Autowash Lakeside at 9525 E 40th Ave 110 Denver Co 80238 via first class mail. Compliance date: 03-24-2025 Submitted by: B Webb 18-1CS Exhibit V - Page 2 of 19 Supplemental: Author: #18-1 CS WEBB, BARBARA Report time; 03/17/2025 08:25 Entered by: #18-1 CS WEBB, BARBARA Entered time: 03/17/2025 08:25 Narrative : Supplemental Report TEXT: On 02-26-2025 I received a complaint from RPI Jan Facinelli in regards to a loud noise disturbance occuring at the car wash located at 5900 W 44th Ave . She stated the car was runs 24 hours and when all 4 stalls are going and in the dry cycle it is extremely loud. She stated she has taken a decible reading from her Iphone which shows it is a consistent 80 decibels or better. I stated to her I would look into the zoning with the city planners and the code in which they are to follow for allowable noise. I stated I would follow up once I had more information. I contacted the City of Wheat Ridge planning department they provided me with verification of the zoning: Commercial I was able to located the 16-103 Unreasonable noise; disturbing the peace ordinance and the allowable limits for hours of operation. 0700- 2200 65 decibels. 2200 to 0700 60 decibels. I contacted RP1 Jan and stated to her I would need to go out and take a decibel reading. She stated she has other neighbors that are complaining . I stated to have them contact me. RPI Jan stated she runs a vet counseling business out of the property located at 4355 Gray St but lives in Denver. She stated RP2 Gretchen Josten located at 4360 Gray St has also made complaints to her Submitted by: B Webb 18-1 CS Exhibit V - Pafle 3 of 19 Supplemental: Author: #18-1CS WEBB, BARBARA Report time: 03/18/2025 09:02 Entered by: #18-1 CS WEBB, BARBARA Entered time: 03/18/2025 09:02 Narrative: Supplemental Report TEXT: On 03-18-2025 at approximatley 0904 hours I returned a call to AP Mary Mills who is an employee for Lakeside Auto Wash, she was requesting approximate decibel data from the car wash so she could provide this to her tech team. Submitted by: B Webb 18-ICS Exhibit V - Page 4 of 19 Supplemental: Author: Entered by: Narrative: #18-1CS WEBB, BARBARA Report time: 03/26/2025 08:35 #18-1CS WEBB, BARBARA Entered time: 03/26/2025 08:35 Disclaimer: This report is a synopsis of this investigation and is not meant to provide a complete accounting of every detail or circumstance. This report may include information regarding officer perceptions that may not have been captured in associated body-worn camera (BWC) footage. To the best of my knowledge, BWC recordings of the events described in this report were conducted in accordance with CRS 24-31-902 and any lack of footage was not the result of intentional "tampering" as defined in CRS 24-31-901 (6). BWC was not activated or was muted in accordance with this statute including when necessary to avoid recording personal information that is not case related; when working on an unrelated assignment; when there is a long break in the incident; and in administrative, tactical, and management discussions when civilians were not present. BWC also may not have been activated when an interaction with the public was recorded by other means. BWC may not be activated in the specific circumstance of officers working in jail that has functioning video cameras except when jail peace officers are separately required to activate BWC for tasks requiring an anticipated use of force. ****Bwc**** Supplemental Report Decibel reader TEXT; On 03-25-2025 at approximatley 1453 hours I CSO B Webb and Supervisor M Trujillo responded to 5900 W 44th Ave to take another decibel reading. Upon arrival Supervisor M Trujillo responded out to the property activating the decibel reader. Please see her supplemental report. I contacted S2 Dennis Dreeszen who stated he has adjusted the doors, which now close all the way on the south side. I explained the decibel readings are still coming in over 65 decibels with only one bay running. I asked about the sound wall S2 Dennis stated it is a sound pad they use at pickle ball courts which work amazing. But the equipment cost 8 thousand dollars. S2 Dennis stated it would have to attach to the wood picket fence on the south side of the property. I stated to be sure to check with the city of Wheat Ridge permit department for the approval. S2 Dennis stated he was just going to turn this over to his business partner/wife Erin Dreeszen, he stated she would be incontact. Received a message from S3 Erin on my work desk phone. On 03-26-2025 at approximatley 0840 hours I returned the call to 53 Erin. No answer, left detailed message for a return call. Submitted by: B Webb 18-1CS Exhibit V - Page 5 of 19 Supplemental: Author: #11-1C8 TRUJILLO, MARIE Report time: 03/27/2025 08:06 Entered by: #11 -ICS TRUJILLO, MARIE Entered time: 03/27/2025 08:0 Narrative: Disclaimer: This report is a synopsis of this investigation and is not meant to provide a complete accounting of every detail or circumstance. This report may include information regarding officer perceptions that may not have been captured in associated body-worn camera (BWC) footage. To the best of my knowledge, BWC recordings of the events described in this report were conducted in accordance with CRS 24-31-902 and any lack of footage was not the result of intentional "tampering" as defined in CRS 24-31-901 (6). BWC was not activated or was muted in accordance with this statute including when necessary to avoid recording personal information that is not case related; when working on an unrelated assignment; when there is a long break in the incident; and in administrative, tactical, and management discussions when civilians were not present. BWC also may not have been activated when an interaction with the public was recorded by other means. BWC may not be activated in the specific circumstance of officers working in jail that has functioning video cameras except when jail peace officers are separately required to activate BW C for tasks requiring an anticipated use of force. **BWC** On 03-25-2025 at approximately 1453 hours, Ofc Webb and I rechecked 5900 W 44th Ave on a decibel reading. Upon arrival I observed one car working a vacuum located on the West side of the carwash parking lot. Soon after I exited the vehicle the vacuum stopped and I was unable to get a reading. While standing along the Southeast corner/sidewalk, I observed a white Chevy SUV enter into one of the East carwash bays. While the car began it's cycle, I observed the back south door shut close automatically and began the sound reading on our decibel machine. During the wash cycle the decibel readings ranged from 62-72db. Record of the readings were video tapped on my body camera. Once the reading was complete I return to the vehicle and observed Ofc Webb contacting the property owner over a phone conversation, refer to Ofc Webb's supp for further. All information was turned into command staff to discuss the next steps to take place. It was decided to extend out the compliance date to 03/31/2025. If the property is not in compliance or no game plan is submitted, all information will be forward to Community Development to submit a letter regarding 5900 W 44th Ave special use permit revocation and a Administrative Citation will be issued. Submitted by: M Trujillo 11-1CS Exhibit V - Page 6 of 19 Supplemental: Author: #23-1 CS PANKAU, ROGER Entered by: #23-1CS PANKAU, ROGER Narrative: Report time: 04/01/2025 08:21 Entered time: 04/01./2025 08:21 On 3/30/2025 I CSO Pankau measured the decibels at the carwash at 5900 W. 44th Ave from 1300 to 1330 hours. I stationed myself at the southeast corner of the carwash on Gray street. During this time, only one bay was in use at any one time, so the readings represent only one bay in use. *Bay #1 (east bay) had a sound reading of 61.1 decibels during the wash with the door closed and a 74.9 reading with the blowers in use with the door closed. *Bay #2 (middle bay) had a sound reading of 55.8 decibels during the wash with the door closed and 69.0 reading with the blowers in use with the door closed. *Bay #3 (west bay) had a sound reading of 50.5 decibels during the wash with the door closed and 66.7 reading with the blowers in use with the door closed. * Bay #4 (far west bay) was not used. I did not have the opportunity to measure sound readings on more than one bay at a time during the test period. One vehicle used one of the vacuums and the sound reading on the single vacuum reached 66.0 decibels. The weather was cool (around 43 degrees F) during the test period with chance of rain, which may have contributed to the low volume of cars using the carwash. **Allowable Noise Levels in DBA for Residential is 55 DBA from 0700 to 2200 hours and 50 DBA from 2200 to 0700 hours. per Sec 16-103 Unreasonable noise; disturbing the peace. e-mailed the test measurement results to DC Kellogg, Ofc's Marie Trujillo, Phil Schroeder and Barbara Webb on 3/31/2025. Submitted by: R. Pankau 23-1CS Exhibit V - Page 7 of 19 Supplemental: Author: #11-1CS TRUJILLO, MARIE Report time: 04/03/2025 12:00 Entered by: #11-1CS TRUJILLO, MARIE Entered time: 04/03/2025 12:00 Narrative: Disclaimer: This report is a synopsis of this investigation and is not meant to provide a complete accounting of every detail or circumstance. This report may include information regarding officer perceptions that may not have been captured in associated body-worn camera (BWC) footage. To the best of my knowledge, BWC recordings of the events described in this report were conducted in accordance with CRS 24-31-902 and any lack of footage was not the result of intentional "tampering" as defined in CRS 24-31-901 (6). BWC was not activated or was muted in accordance with this statute including when necessary to avoid recording personal information that is not case related; when working on an unrelated assignment; when there is a long break in the incident; and in administrative, tactical, and management discussions when civilians were not present. BWC also may not have been activated when an interaction with the public was recorded by other means. BWC may not be activated in the specific circumstance of officers working in jail that has functioning video cameras except when jail peace officers are separately required to activate BWC for tasks requiring an anticipated use of force. **BWC** Attachment Summons #M-67909 Community Development Letter On 04/03/2025 at approximately 0900 hours, I rechecked 5900 W 44th Ave for a decibel read at the Autowash Lakeside property. Upon arrival I observed a black Toyota truck enter in the far East carwash bay (#1). While on scene, I took a decibel reading with the City of Wheat Ridge agencies decibel reader that was calibrated on 05/08/2024 with a listed expiration date of 05/08/2025. Prior to the truck arriving on the property I took a decibel read of the general traffic, traveling West and East bound on 44th Ave. While taking the reading no carwash bay was operating at the time. The reading from the traffic alone ranged from 53.4 db-60.6 db located at the South fence line of the properly. As the Toyota truck entered in the far East bay (#1) the reading ranged from 58.7 (start of wash) to 70.01 (during the blowers) decibels. During the time on scene I was only able to record the one reading. No other cars entered the facility or used the vacuums. On 04/03/2025 at approximately 1000 hours, I met with Dennis Dreeszen, Erin Dreeszen, Commander Hunt, Supervisor Schroeder and Planning Manger Jana Easley. During this meeting all information of the code case was provided to the Dreeszen's. It was advised I was out on the property earlier that morning and the recorded decibel reading were provided to them along with the past readings on 03/03/2025 (ref supp 5). Erin Dreeszen stated the sound matting still needed to be complete and more adhesive tape needed to be ordered as the supplier ran out of materials. Erin stated the West carwash bays were complete and should be up and running. I Exhibit V - Page 8 of 19 advised Erin the bays were off-line when recording the readings at 9am that morning. The only bays operating at the time were the East bays that had no padding. While going over the details of the case a copy of ordinance 16-103 Disturbing the Peace and 26-114 Special Uses were provided along with a Community Development letter regarding the Special Uses outlines from Jana Easley. It was explained to them, I would be issuing a Summons #M-67909 for 16-103 Disturbing the Peace and 26-114 Special Uses for failing to meet the 03/31/2025 deadline. In addition, giving them the opportunity to speak to the Judge if they would like to question any of the issues and or violations. The Dreeszen's stated they plan to move forward with the padding in hopes it corrects the nuisance and if not, may consider a sound wall barrier. Jana Easley informed the Dreeszan's to contact her if they come to that point. It was also advised to the Dreeszen's if the padding does fix the issue regarding the noise the Summons would be voided. The Dreeszen's stated they understood. Summons #M-67909 was issued and handed to Dennis Dreeszen. Court date: 05/01/2025 Submitted by: M Trujillo 11-1CS Exhibit V - Page 9 of 19 Supplemental: RECEIVED I.AY -62025 WHEAT RIDGE MUN-I-CIPAt COURT Author: #18-1CS WEBB, BARBARA Report time: 04/14/2025 09:36 Entered by: #18-1CS WEBB, BARBARA Entered time: 04/14/2025 09:36 Narrative: Disclaimer: This report is a synopsis of this investigation and is not meant to provide a complete accounting of every detail or circumstance. This report may include information regarding officer perceptions that may not have been captured in associated body-worn camera (BWC) footage. To the best of my knowledge, BWC recordings of the events described in this report were conducted in accordance with CRS 24-31-902 and any lack of footage was not the result of intentional "tampering" as defined in CRS 24-31-901 (6). BWC was not activated or was muted in accordance with this statute including when necessary to avoid recording personal information that is not case related; when working on an unrelated assignment; when there is a long break in the incident; and in administrative, tactical, and management discussions when civilians were not present. BWC also may not have been activated when an interaction with the public was recorded by other means. BWC may not be activated in the specific circumstance of officers working in jail that has functioning video cameras except when jail peace officers are separately required to activate BWC for tasks requiring an anticipated use of force. ****BWC**** TEXT: On 04-08-2025 at approximately 1253 hours I CSO B Webb and Supervisor M Trujillo responded to 5900 W 44th Ave to meet with the car wash technician. Upon arrival we met with the male party. I explained to him that I wanted to take a variation of readings, starting with 1 vacuum, then all vacuums, then all the wash cycles. - My first reading was taken with one bay and one vacuum going readings from the back yard were at approximately 52.5 to 54.5, as I approached the fence line my readings increased to 63.6 to 66.5 with the dryer going and one vacuum. At one point reaching 68.3 this can vary due to level of traffic. When dryer shut off I was getting stable reading of 58.1 and as low as 51.2 for just on vacuum. - I continued my reading with the next phase of three bays and all vacuums running simultaneously. 8 minute process. 54.6 - 55.6 with wash cycle and all vacuums running. Dry cycles ranged vrom 64.8 to 62.00. As I headed east along the property line north of the fence to Gray St the readings were 58.3 -61.2 being the highest. As I traveled South on Gray St the readings for one bay dryer were ranging from 61.4 to 56.5 Submitted by: B Webb 18-1CS Exhibit V - Page 10 of 19 Supplemental: Author: Entered by: Narrative: #22-9 DENOTO, ZACHERY #22-9 DENOTO, ZACHERY RECEIVED MAY -6202S WHEAT RIDGE Report time: 04/17/2025 OISAVN I OPAL COURT Entered time: 04/17/2025 00:06 Disclaimer: This report is a synopsis of this investigation and is not meant to provide a complete accounting of every detail or circumstance. This report may include information regarding officer perceptions that may not have been captured in associated body-worn camera (BWC) footage. To the best of my knowledge, BWC recordings of the events described in this report were conducted in accordance with CRS 24-31-902 and any lack of footage was not the result of intentional "tampering" as defined in CRS 24-31-901 (6). BWC was not activated or was muted in accordance with this statute including when necessary to avoid recording personal information that is not case related; when working on an unrelated assignment; when there is a long break in the incident; and in administrative, tactical, and management discussions when civilians were not present. BWC also may not have been activated when an interaction with the public was recorded by other means. BWC may not be activated in the specific circumstance of officers working in jail that has functioning video cameras except when jail peace officers are separately required to activate BWC for tasks requiring an anticipated use of force. ***BWC*** Text: On 04-16-25 at approximately 2248 hours, I was attached to this case to assist Cpl. Smith with follow-up regarding this case. I met with Cpl. Smith at the Autowash, 5900 W 44th Ave and took decibel readings while Cpl. Smith washed a patrol car. On the sidewalk at the southeast corner of the property the highest reading was approximately 70 decibels for about one second as the vehicle entered the wash station. The doors shut and the average reading was approximately 54 decibels. Passing traffic on W. 44th Ave periodically affected the reading, making it jump into the 60 decibels range. in the back yard of vacant property 4355 N Gray St, along the north fence line, the reading was approximately 49 decibels. At both the mid point and south end of the yard, the reading was approximately 47 decibels. At both the mid point and south end of the yard I could barely hear the car wash operating. See other officers' reports for additional details. DeNoto 22-9 Exhibit V - Page 11 of 19 Supplemental: Author: #16-2 SMITH, KIRA Report time: 04/17/2025 02:27 Entered by: #16-2 SMITH, KIRA Entered time: 04/17/2025 02:27 Narrative: ***Body Worn Camera*** Attachments: Receipt from Lakeside Carwash (04/16/2025) Text: RECEIVED MAY -62025 WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL COURT On 04/16/2025 at approximately 2200 hours, Officer Gonzalez asked me to assist him on a follow-up investigation that he was not able to complete before the end of his shift. Officer Gonzalez advised me that he needed me to go to Lakeside Car Wash, located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, to complete a decibel reading. Officer Gonzalez advised that one reading should be taken from the southeast corner of the property and three spots in the backyard of the unoccupied residence, located at 4355 Gray Street, in the center, one just to right of that and one just to left of the center point. I asked Officer DeNoto to assist me because I was unable to reach either the owner or the maintenance worker at the numbers provided to me: • 720-616-9072 (2249 hours) • 720-671-1736 (2249 hours) There were no patrons using the carwash at this location, so I used the carwash to wash my patrol vehicle, using Sergeant Eversole's City of Wheat Ridge issued credit card. I have attached the receipt to my report. Officer DeNoto completed the reading while I went through the carwash, please see his report for further information. It should be noted that I originally responded to Rainbow Carwash, located at 6800 W. 44th Avenue. I completed readings, with Officer DeNoto, at this carwash and realized after that I needed to respond to Lakeside Carwash. I then responded to Lakeside Carwash and completed the readings, once I realized this. Submitted by: Corporal K. Smith 16-2 Exhibit V - Page 12 of 19 Supplemental: Author: #18-ICS WEBB, BARBARA Report time: 04/22/2025 10:18 Entered by: #18-ICS WEBB, BARBARA Entered time: 04/22/2025 10118 RECEIVED Narrative: - Supplemental Report MAY 6 2025 WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL COURT After all readings taken by officers during various hours of day and night; according to the readings of the property located at 5900 W 44th Ave are within the allowed decibel reading of 65 during daytime operations of 0700-2200 and 60 decibels from the hours of 2200 to 0700. TEXT: All information forwarded onto command staff. Follow up to continue Court date: 05-01-2025 @0830 Submitted by: B Webb 18-1CS Exhibit V - Pa2e 13 of 19 Supplemental: Author: Entered by: Narrative: Text: #11-1CS TRUJILLO, MARIE Report time: 04/30/2025 13:40 #11-1CS TRUJILLO, MARIE Entered time: 04/30/2025 13:40 On 04/30/2025 at approximately 1200 hours, I reviewed my supplemental report #6 recorded on 4/3/2025 per the request of our City attorney. After reviewing my report I discovered the location listed was not specific to the exact spot that I took the readings from. That specific spot was 4355 Gray St, north fence line. All sound decibel readings were taken on 4355 Gray St. Please review to my body camera footage for further Submitted by: M Trujillo 11-1CS RECEIVED MAY -6 2025 WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL COURT Exhibit V - Page 14 of 19 Supplemental: Author: Entered by: Narrative: #18-ICS VVEBB, BARBARA #18-1CS VVEBB, BARBARA Report time: 04/14/2025 09:36 Entered time: 04/14/2025 09:36 RECEIVED MAY -62025 WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL COURT Disclaimer: This report is a synopsis of this investigation and is not meant to provide a complete accounting of every detail or circumstance. This report may include information regarding officer perceptions that may not have been captured in associated body-worn camera (BWC) footage. To the best of my knowledge, BWC recordings of the events described in this report were conducted in accordance with CRS 24-31-902 and any lack of footage was not the result of intentional "tampering" as defined in CRS 24-31-901 (6). BWC was not activated or was muted in accordance with this statute including when necessary to avoid recording personal information that is not case related; when working on an unrelated assignment; when there is a long break in the incident; and in administrative, tactical, and management discussions when civilians were not present. BWC also may not have been activated when an interaction with the public was recorded by other means. BWC may not be activated in the specific circumstance of officers working in jail that has functioning video cameras except when jail peace officers are separately required to activate BWC for tasks requiring an anticipated use of force. ****Bwc**** TEXT: On 04-08-2025 at approximately 1253 hours I CSO B Webb and Supervisor M Trujillo responded to 5900 W 44th Ave to meet with the car wash technician. Upon arrival we met with the male party. I explained to him that I wanted to take a variation of readings, starting with 1 vacuum, then all vacuums, then all the wash cycles. - My first reading was taken with one bay and one vacuum going readings from the back yard were at approximately 52.5 to 54.5, as I approached the fence line my readings increased to 63.6 to 66.5 with the dryer going and one vacuum. At one point reaching 68.3 this can vary due to level of traffic. When dryer shut off I was getting stable reading of 58.1 and as low as 51.2 for just on vacuum. - I continued my reading with the next phase of three bays and all vacuums running simultaneously. 8 minute process. 54.6 - 55.6 with wash cycle and all vacuums running. Dry cycles ranged vrom 64.8 to 62.00. As I headed east along the property line north of the fence to Gray St the readings were 58.3 -61.2 being the highest. As I traveled South on Gray St the readings for one bay dryer were ranging from 61.4 to 56.5 Submitted by: B Webb 18-1CS Exhibit V - Pa2e 15 of 19 RECEIVED Supplemental: MAY -62025 Author: #22-9 DENOTO, ZACHERY Report time: 04/17/2025 00:06 Entered by: #22-9 DENOTO, ZACHERY Entered time: 04/17/2025 00:06.. WHEAT RIDGE nnUNICIPAL COURT Narrative: Disclaimer: This report is a synopsis of this investigation and is not meant to provide a complete accounting of every detail or circumstance. This report may include information regarding officer perceptions that may not have been captured in associated body-worn camera (BWC) footage. To the best of my knowledge, BWC recordings of the events described in this report were conducted in accordance with CRS 24-31-902 and any lack of footage was not the result of intentional 'tampering" as defined in CRS 24-31-901 (6). BWC was not activated or was muted in accordance with this statute including when necessary to avoid recording personal information that is not case related; when working on an unrelated assignment; when there is a long break in the incident; and in administrative, tactical, and management discussions when civilians were not present. BWC also may not have been activated when an interaction with the public was recorded by other means. BWC may not be activated in the specific circumstance of officers working in jail that has functioning video cameras except when jail peace officers are separately required to activate BWC for tasks requiring an anticipated use of force. Text: On 04-16-25 at approximately 2248 hours, I was attached to this case to assist Cpi. Smith with follow-up regarding this case. I met with Cpl. Smith at the Autowash, 5900 W 44th Ave and took decibel readings while Cpl. Smith washed a patrol car. On the sidewalk at the southeast corner of the property the highest reading was approximately 70 decibels for about one second as the vehicle entered the wash station. The doors shut and the average reading was approximately 54 decibels, Passing traffic on W. 44th Ave periodically affected the reading, making it jump into the 60 decibels range. In the back yard of vacant property 4355 N Gray St, along the north fence line, the reading was approximately 49 decibels. At both the mid point and south end of the yard, the reading was approximately 47 decibels. At both the mid point and south end of the yard I could barely hear the car wash operating. See other officers' reports for additional details. DeNoto 22-9 Exhibit V - Paae 16 of 19 Su o p lennental: Author: #16-2 SMITH, KIRA Entered by: #16-2 SMITH, KIRA Narrative: ***Body Worn Camera*** Attachments: Receipt from Lakeside Carwash (04/16/2025) Text: Report time: Entered time: 04/17/2025 02:27 04/17/2025 02:27 RECEIVED MAY -62025 WIlEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL COURT On 04/16/2025 at approximately 2200 hours, Officer Gonzalez asked me to assist him on a follow-up investigation that he was not able to complete before the end of his shift. Officer Gonzalez advised me that he needed me to go to Lakeside Car Wash, located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, to complete a decibel reading. Officer Gonzalez advised that one reading should be taken from the southeast corner of the property and three spots in the backyard of the unoccupied residence, located at 4355 Gray Street, in the center, one just to right of that and one just to left of the center point. I asked Officer DeNoto to assist me because I was unable to reach either the owner or the maintenance worker at the numbers provided to me: • 720-616-9072 (2249 hours) • 720-671-1736 (2249 hours) There were no patrons using the carwash at this location, so I used the carwash to wash my patrol vehicle, using Sergeant Eversole's City of Wheat Ridge issued credit card. I have attached the receipt to my report. Officer DeNoto completed the reading while I went through the carwash, please see his report for further information. It should be noted that I originally responded to Rainbow Carwash, located at 6800 W. 44th Avenue. I completed readings, with Officer DeNoto, at this carwash and realized after that I needed to respond to Lakeside Carwash. I then responded to Lakeside Carwash and completed the readings, once I realized this. Submitted by: Corporal K. Smith 16-2 Exhibit V - Page 17 of 19 Supplemental: Author: #18-1CS WEBB, BARBARA Entered by: #18-1CS WEBB, BARBARA Narrative: Supplemental Report TEXT: Report time: 04/22/2025 10:18 04/22/2025 10: Entered time: 1kECE1VED - 6 2025 Wk-LEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL_ COURT After all readings taken by officers during various hours of day and night; according to the readings of the property located at 5900 W 44th Ave are within the allowed decibel reading of 65 during daytime operations of 0700-2200 and 60 decibels from the hours of 2200 to 0700. All information forwarded onto command staff. Follow up to continue Court date; 05-01-2025 @0830 Submitted by: B Webb 18-1CS Exhibit V - Pne 18 of 19 Supplemental: Author: Entered by: Narrative: Text: #11-1CS TRUJILLO, MARIE Report time: 04/30/2025 13:40 #11-1CS TRUJILLO, MARIE Entered time: 04/30/2025 1 RcLEIVED MAY -6 2025 WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL COURT On 04/30/2025 at approximately 1200 hours, I reviewed my supplemental report #6 recorded on 4/3/2025 per the request of our City attorney. After reviewing my report I discovered the location listed was not specific to the exact spot that I took the readings from. That specific spot was 4355 Gray St, north fence line. All sound decibel readings were taken on 4355 Gray St. Please review to my body camera footage for further Submitted by: M Trujillo 11-1 CS Exhibit V - Pne 19 of 19 1 From:Peckler, John Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 8:28 AM To:Lauren Mikulak Cc:Gerald Dahl; Singleton, Evan; dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; JeffK@waveengineering.us; Jana Easley Subject:RE: Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study Attachments:Officer Reports(10114246.1)-c.pdf Good morning, Lauren, Thank you for the update. Apologies for the delay…we have been trying to confirm dates and details for this response. Please see below Autowash’s response to your questions. We understand the city’s desire to see meaningful progress here and want to reiterate Autowash’s commitment to being a responsible business and good neighbor. As you know, Autowash went through all the proper permitting procedures with the city and has reasonably relied in good faith on the city’s approvals to make a significant investment in the city. The car wash has only been open for a few months, and Autowash has no intent to cause a problem for its neighbors. Autowash has also taken material steps to reduce sound by modifying its normal protocols, these measures cannot be seen from the outside, but they have been ongoing since the carwash opened. In addition to the below, I had a few follow up questions. Why did the city pay for the sound study for the gun range on 38th ? It sounds like the residents that have complained about the car wash can also hear the gun range. In that instance, it is my understanding that the city paid for the sound study and the urban renewal authority is going to pay for the cost of the mitigation improvements. Just trying to understand the different approaches to noise mitigation. Are city funds available to cover all or a portion of the cost for this sound study and/or any sound mitigation? Finally, when I reviewed the city council meetings and study sessions, I did not hear council receive a formal update from the police department with the results of the additional testing by officers with the city’s decibel reader that were done on April 8th and April 16th. I could have missed that update, so my apologies if that has already been done. The results of that additional testing are summarized in the attached reports. I understand that the residents don’t feel that the issues have been resolved, but the testing done by the police department was done before some of the final mitigation measures were fully in place and the results showed decibel levels in the 40-50 range in the properties behind the car wash. I understand the desire for the sound study to have a more comprehensive picture of the potential impacts, but as you have mentioned that will take time. I think the testing that the officers have already done is worth sharing with council, if council wanted an interim update on how the current mitigation measures are working. The officers could also do another site visit with the decibel reader to get a single data point to share with city council. Sound study timeline – When are measurements scheduled to be taken, and when can we expect a draft or preliminary findings? o Autowash has scheduled the sound consultant to complete the testing for a sound study. The earliest available time to be on site to complete the testing is mid-July. Once the testing is complete, it will take time to build the computer model from the results and to Exhibit W - Page 1 of 6 2 prepare a report summarizing the findings. I have not confirmed with the sound consultant, but the expectation is that we would have a final report by mid-August. Current hours of operation – Please confirm your current opening and closing times. o The carwash opens at 7:00 am and closes at 9:55 pm daily. Because the carwash is designed for 24-hour operation, the owners are manually starting and stopping the carwash, to fit this schedule and there have been some glitches in how this works. Autowash has hired software engineers to redesign the system to do this automatically, but it is a complicated process to reengineer the programing. Sound-dampening equipment – You mentioned in early May that vacuum-related dampening equipment was purchased. Has it been installed? If so, when? o On April 24th, Autowash completed the installation of sound dampening panels in the inside of the entry bay doors on the south side of the wash that face the residential properties to the south. These types of panels are not typically used, and it required some trial and error to determine how to attach the panels in the humid climate of the car wash. The panels were first installed on April 11th, and it took two weeks to identify an effective means for attachment them to the bay doors. o On May 8, 2025, Autowash installed sound dampening material in all vacuum domes to muffle vacuum motors. Autowash also replaced all vacuum motors with “quite” motors to reduce sound. o Autowash continues to investigate what additional sound dampening measures can be implemented at this site, which requires testing and outreach to equipment manufacturers. Dryer/door operations – Recent complaints seem to be focused on the dryer noise. Can you clarify the current operational pattern of the doors? o Are both doors open during drying? When the temperature is above 35 degrees, normal operating protocols would be to have both doors always open to release moisture. On March 11th Autowash set the entry doors to close halfway to reduce sound. They did an internal test, and that wasn’t working well enough. On March 18th, the entry doors were set to fully close. To address the noise for the adjacent residents to the south, Autowash has changed its normal protocols so that the entry door (south facing neighborhood side) is closed through the entire wash and dry process. The exit door on the north side remails open during the wash and dry cycle. Once the wash is complete, all doors open and remain open until the next wash. o Does one door remain closed while the other opens? See response above. o Is there a consistent standard operating procedure? On March 18th, Autowash started implementing the above-described process for having the entry bay door closed during and has continued that practice since then. Best regards, John John Peckler Attorney Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 | Denver, CO 80203 O 303.839.3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com | spencerfane.com Exhibit W - Page 2 of 6 3 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:50 AM To: Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com>; Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; JeffK@waveengineering.us Cc: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com>; Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. Good morning, Yesterday, Councilmembers and staff received additional complaints from neighbors regarding noise. After their study session last night, I briefed Council on the status and your responsiveness, but it appears their patience is wearing thin. There’s growing concern about the ongoing impacts, and a strong interest in seeing meaningful progress. Council understands that a public hearing could be a next step, but I’ve asked for space to allow the sound study to be completed and for your team to implement mitigation efforts. I truly want us to stay on a productive track and avoid a more formal enforcement process if possible. In the meantime, I need your help responding to Council’s questions. Please provide updates on the following: Sound study timeline – When are measurements scheduled to be taken, and when can we expect a draft or preliminary ﬁndings? Current hours of operation – Please conﬁrm your current opening and closing times. Sound-dampening equipment – You mentioned in early May that vacuum-related dampening equipment was purchased. Has it been installed? If so, when? Dryer/door operations – Recent complaints seem to be focused on the dryer noise. Can you clarify the current operational pattern of the doors? o Are both doors open during drying? o Does one door remain closed while the other opens? o Is there a consistent standard operating procedure? I appreciate your prompt response. I’ve explained that both the sound study and legal processes take time, but I believe quick, clear communication from your side will go a long way in maintaining trust and demonstrating your continued good faith. Thanks in advance, Lauren Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL!The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 4:21 PM To: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; Exhibit W - Page 3 of 6 4 JeffK@waveengineering.us Cc: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com>; Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Subject: RE: Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study Thank you, Jana. We will review and be in touch. Evan Evan C. Singleton Attorney Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 | Denver, CO 80203 O 303.839.3750 |C 720.760.2211 esingleton@spencerfane.com | spencerfane.com From: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 2:00 PM To:dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; JeffK@waveengineering.us Cc: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com>; Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com>; Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. Hello Jeff, Erin and Dennis, After doing some research on who spoke during the hearings and/or to city staff, we’ve applied those to the below map (orange stars). Based on these, we propose three additional locations where sound readings should be taken (yellow X’s). We will leave it to Jeff as the expert to determine if these are the best locations, but they seem right based on complaints and/or proximity to the carwash. Jeff, once you have a timeline of the work, please let us know. Thanks, Jana Caution:This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit W - Page 4 of 6 5 Jana Easley, AICP Planning Manager 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Ofﬁce Phone: 303-235-2844 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us NEW PERMIT PORTAL!The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. Exhibit W - Page 5 of 6 6 Don't forget to follow our Social Media Accounts! Facebook - bit.ly/FBWRPD - bit.ly/FBCityWR Twitter - twitter.com/WheatRidgePD - twitter.com/CityWheatRidge Instagram - bit.ly/InstaWRPD CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-conﬁdential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notiﬁed that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Exhibit W - Page 6 of 6 John Peckler Direct Dial: 303-839-3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com SPENCER FANE LLP | 1700 LINCOLN STREET, SUITE 2000, DENVER, CO 80203-4554 | 303.839.3800 | FAX | spencerfane.com June 25, 2025 VIA E-MAIL Lauren Mikulak, AICP City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Director 7500 W. 29th Avenue, 2nd Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us Gerald Dahl, Esq. City Attorney City of Wheat Ridge 710 Kipling Street, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80215 gdahl@mdbrlaw.com Re: Response to Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash - SUP- 23-01 – 5900 W. 44th Avenue Dear Ms. Mikulak: Spencer Fane LLP represents the operators (“Autowash”) of the Autowash Lakeside carwash (“Carwash”), located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80212. I am in receipt of the Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash dated June 24, 2025 (“Notice of Noncompliance”). Autowash disputes the findings of noncompliance outlined in the Notice of Noncompliance because the City has failed to show that Autowash has not adhered to or has been found to have materially altered in scope, application, or design any stipulation or condition of SUP-23-01 (“SUP”) in the operation of the Carwash. Therefore, because the City has not demonstrated non-compliance with any stipulation or condition of the SUP, the City is exceeding its enforcement authority under Section 26-114.F of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code in seeking the Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines described in the Notice of Noncompliance. Notwithstanding Autowash’s position regarding the SUP enforcement, in the interest of being a responsible business and neighbor, however, Autowash requests that the City grant a 90-day extension for compliance with all Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines described in the Notice of Noncomliance during which 90-day period Autowash will voluntarily suspend operation of the Carwash, obtain and sound study, and coordinate with the City on potential additional mitigation measures or operational changes, and complete any additional sound testing to evaluate the results of mitigation put into place as a result of this process. Autowash’s proposed 90-day extension during Exhibit Y - Page 1 of 2 Lauren Mikulak Gerald Dahl June 25, 2025 Page 2 DE 10130537.1 which the Carwash will suspend all operations would be effective on Monday, June 30, 2025, and will result in immediate action that fully mitigates the noise impacts from the Carwash on the nearby homes and businesses. This approach will also provide the City and Autowash with more time and flexibility to investigate and evaluate potential long-term solutions without causing any additional impacts to residents or Autowash’s business. During the 90-day suspension of Carwash operations, the app for using the Carwash will show the Carwash as “offline” and “coming soon,” the kiosks will have closed messages rotating on the screens, and the Carwash itself will be inoperable. Except to the extent required to complete the purposes of the initial sound study and additional sound testing, the temporary suspension of all Carwash operations will remain until the end of the 90-day extension or sooner on mutual agreement of the City and Autowash. Autowash will give the City two days prior written notice of the date scheduled for any sound testing so that the Carwash can be reponed and used for all purposes necessary to complete such testing. Autowash will also commit to providing the City with a copy of the sound study during the proposed 90-day extension and giving the City updates on any additional mitigation measures or sound testing as a result of the initial sound study. Autowash hopes that the proposed 90-day extension for compliance with all Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines in the Notice of Noncompliance will achieve the purpose for issuing the Notice of Noncompliance, and allow Autowash with the time needed to complete the sound study, evaluate additional mitigation options, and complete any additional testing required to assess the effectiveness of any mitigation measures put into place. Autowash understands the nature of the City’s concerns and is offering the City with an option to provide certainty that there will not be any additional impact on nearby homes and businesses while Autowash evaluates long-term options to address such concerns. In Autowash’s opinion, the requested 90-day extension better protects the residents of the City and provides Autowash with the flexibility necessary to find long-term solutions. If the City is willing to accept Autowash’s proposal, Autowash requires that the City confirm in writing that all Required Corrective Actions and Deadlines in the Notice of Noncompliance have been extended for 90 days on the condition that Autowash suspend Carwash operations effective on June 30, 2025, through the remainder of such extension. To provide Autowash with the necessary time to suspend operations by Monday, June 30, 2025, Autowash requires that the City confirm in writing the 90-day extension no later than noon on June 26, 2025. We look forward to your prompt response to this letter. Sincerely, Spencer Fane LLP John Peckler JP Exhibit Y - Page 2 of 2 1 From:Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent:Wednesday, December 10, 2025 2:50 PM To:Peckler, John; Gerald Dahl Cc:Dennis Dreeszen; Singleton, Evan Subject:[EXTERNAL] RE: Current Carwash Operations Attachments:Autowash Qualitative and Quantitative Non-Compliance Continues.pdf [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. John, Good questions. 1.Is the city’s code enforcement team still doing regular testing around the carwash? Has the city identiﬁed any concerns? Not regular testing, but periodic. I think they’ve gone by 3 times and taken measurements at various locations at the property line or in the neighborhood. I don’t have concerns at this time with those readings. 2.When you say third-party sound readings, what does that mean exactly? I have been requested to hire a sound consultant, so we have independent readings. We have the readings you commissioned from Wave, we have neighbors submitting readings, we have our code enforcement team taking periodic readings, and Council requested a city-hired expert. I will hire someone to take readings sometime in January (likely) and will provide their readings to Council. I’ll be in touch when I have someone hired and scheduled and again before any Council discussion. I was planning to run city cars through the wash and take readings from property lines and in the neighborhood, unless you want to coordinate. 3.Can the city share the conditions or concessions that the neighbors were asking for before agreeing to the city’s mediation offer? Attached is the document that the neighbors most recently provided to City Council. They have said that they appreciate the doors being closed. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL!The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. Exhibit Z - Page 1 of 4 2 From: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 3:46 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov>; Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Cc: Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com> Subject: RE: Current Carwash Operations Lauren/Jerry, Thanks for conﬁrming that the agenda item for the carwash on the December study session has been cancelled and the update on the city’s next steps. Please keep us posted on any future study sessions that are scheduled to provide updates or discuss the carwash operations. We will provide the requested information, but I had a few follow up questions for you both. 1.Is the city’s code enforcement team still doing regular testing around the carwash? Has the city identiﬁed any concerns? 2.When you say third-party sound readings, what does that mean exactly? 3.Can the city share the conditions or concessions that the neighbors were asking for before agreeing to the city’s mediation offer? As always, I appreciate the city’s transparency and attention to these matters. Best regards, John John Peckler Attorney Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 | Denver, CO 80203 O 303.839.3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com | spencerfane.com From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 11:54 AM To: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com> Cc: Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Current Carwash Operations [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. No, there won’t be a study session in December. Council is aware that the doors have been observed to be closed, and they would like to see noise readings from a third party before any further discussion. Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Caution:This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit Z - Page 2 of 4 3 Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL!The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 10:58 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com> Cc: Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Subject: RE: Current Carwash Operations Hi, Lauren, I’ll work with Dennis to answer your questions below but wanted to ask if the city is still planning on providing an update to City Council at the study session on 12/16. Best regards, John John Peckler Attorney Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 | Denver, CO 80203 O 303.839.3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com | spencerfane.com From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2025 8:14 PM To: Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com> Cc: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com>; Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Current Carwash Operations [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. Hi Dennis, My last few times driving by the carwash, I noticed that the doors appear to be closed (even at warmer temps in the 50s). Would you please conﬁrm your current SOP for the doors? Do you intend to keep them closed for the full cycle for the foreseeable future? I appreciate this effort. Additionally, would you please also conﬁrm your current hours of operations? Lastly, I have been directed to obtain third party sound readings which will likely occur early next year. After those readings are obtained, there may be an update to City Council and I will keep you apprised if that ends up being in the format of a public study session. Caution:This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit Z - Page 3 of 4 4 Thank you, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone: 303-235-2845 Fax: 303-235-2845 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us NEW PERMIT PORTAL!The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. Don't forget to follow our Social Media Accounts! CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Exhibit Z - Page 4 of 4 1 From:Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent:Wednesday, April 29, 2026 1:28 PM To:Peckler, John Cc:Gerald Dahl; Jana Easley; Dennis Dreeszen; Singleton, Evan; Erin Dreeszen; Jeff Kwolkoski Subject:[EXTERNAL] RE: Current Carwash Operations Attachments:4524 City of Wheatridge Car Wash Noise Impact Report 5-Apr-26.pdf [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. Hi Autowash Team, When we received your CORA request, it reminded me that I hadn’t responded to this email string to send the ﬁnal version of the sound study completed by EDI. I’ve attached it here, and you will also receive it as part of the CORA records delivery. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP |Director Community Development Department Office: 303-235-2845 wheatridge.gov From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2026 3:28 PM To: 'Peckler, John' <jpeckler@spencerfane.com> Cc: Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com>; Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com>; Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com>; Jeff Kwolkoski <jeffk@waveengineering.us> Subject: RE: Current Carwash Operations Hi John, In the course of our review of the draft sound study, we had similar questions to the ones you raise in your April 3 email. We've requested corrections and clariﬁcations before ﬁnalizing the report. We'll be in touch next week. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 Exhibit AA - Page 1 of 1 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 5 April 2026 Ms. Lauren Mikulak, AICP Page 1 of 14 City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Voice: 303-235-2845 RE: Sound Level Measurement Results Lakeside Autowash EDI Job # C-4524 Dear Ms. Mikulak: Engineering Dynamic’s has completed sound level measurements of noise from Lakeside Autowash operations for Lakeside Autowash located at 5900 W 44th Ave. Results of the sound level measurements are described below. 1.0 Background 1.1 Measurement Locations In agreement with City of Wheat Ridge personnel sound levels of Autowash noise were measured at Locations as shown in Figure 1.1 and as follows, Locations A, D and G – along the property line between the Autowash and 4355 Gray St. (commercial property), veterinary clinic zoned R-C (Restricted Commercial). Note: Location G was added by EDI to measure sound from vacuum operations. Location B – at the northwest corner of 4360 Gray St. (residential property, zoned MU-N (mixed use-neighborhood). Location C – along the property line between the Autowash and W. 44th Ave. Location E – at the southeast corner of the apartment building property located at 4455 N. Harlans St., zoned R-C (Restricted Commercial). Location F – at the northwest corner of the commercial property due east of the Autowash, 5892 W. 44th Ave. Location H – on north side of W. 44th Ave. directly north of Location C. Location I – on north side of W. 44th Ave. directly north of Location F. Note: Locations H and I were added by EDI to measure sound across 44th. 1.2 Sound Level Measurement Dates Autowash sound level were measured on Tuesday 10-Mar-26 from ~4pm to 7:30pm, and Wednesday 18-Mar-26 from ~9pm to 10pm. During the measurement periods, approximately 50 car wash events were monitored. During the measurement periods there was vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., and Autowash noise levels were documented only when vehicle traffic noise would not artificially increase / affect Autowash noise levels. Exhibit BB - Page 1 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 2 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 1.3 Instrumentation Sound level measurements were made with a Larson Davis Type 1 Sound Level Analyzer, with a current NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) traceable calibration. The Larson Davis Model 831 Sound Level Meter was field calibrated at the beginning of testing at 94.0 dB. At the completion of all testing the calibration level was checked, with a result of 94.0 dB. The sound level meter was configured to acquire A-weighted, Slow Time constant sound levels in accordance with the City of Wheat Ridge noise ordinance Section 16-103c and the State of Colorado Noise Law, C.R.S. §26-12-103. Instrument Model # Serial # Calibration Date Calibration Due Date Larson Davis Real Time Analyzer Model 831 0004054 19-Jan-26 19-Jan-27 Larson Davis Acoustic Calibrator CAL 200 12548 19-Jan-26 19-Jan-27 1.4 Methodology Sound level measurements of car wash operations were measured at locations A through I. Measurements were made under typical / normal Autowash operations. During some of the measurements there was only one vehicle wash cycle and during other measurements multiple (two or three) simultaneous or nearly simultaneous vehicle wash cycles. This represents a realistic of the noise impact from Autowash operations on nearby properties. The reported sound levels represent typical and maximum sound level ranges for various car wash cycles, initial entry prewash, wash, drying and vacuum. Interpretation of sound levels as compared to the City of Wheatridge noise ordinance Section 16-103 and the State of Colorado noise law, for a sound level from a commercial property to a commercial and / or residential property. 1.5 Noise Wall along Southern Autowash Property Line Figure 1.5.1 shows a picture of the “Noise Wall;” which has been installed along the property line between the Autowash and the residential property at 4355 Gray St. Figure 1.5.2 shows a picture of the noise wall from the southwest side / corner and shows the noise wall construction. There is an elevation difference between the Autowash driveway grade and the yard elevation of the residence, of ~2-feet. The noise wall was installed at the residence yard grade and has a height of 6-feet above this grade and a height of ~8-feet above the Autowash driveway grade. 2.0 Applicable Noise Ordinance / Law 2.1 City of Wheatridge Noise Ordinance The City of Wheatridge noise limits are described in Article V, Section 16-103 and is shown at the end of this report. Section (§) 16-103c, Table A does not specifically define the condition of commercial property to residential property; it only defines noise from industrial premises onto residential, commercial and industrial premises. Therefore, the applicable noise limits are those as defined in the State of Colorado Noise Law, C.R.S. §26-12-103. [ Exhibit BB - Page 2 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 3 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 2.2 State of Colorado Noise Law C.R.S. 25-12-103 The relevant portions of the State of Colorado Noise Law Section 25-12-103 are attached at the end of this report. CRS §25-12-103 includes the following noise limits: Zone 7:00am to next 7:00pm 7:00pm to next 7am Residential 55 dBA 50 dBA Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA Light Industrial 70 dBA 65 dBA Heavy Industrial 80 dBA 75 dBA Since the subject property is adjacent to both residentially and commercially zoned properties, the decibel readings for each are prescribed by the above table. As defined, commercial to residential limits are the first row. Commercial to commercial limits are the second row. There are no industrially zoned properties adjacent to the site. Table 2.2 shows the applicable noise / sound level compliance levels for the properties associated with each of the measurement locations Table 2.2: Applicable Noise Compliance Limits at each Measurement Location: Measurement Location Adjacent Property Zoning Noise Compliance Limits 7:00am to next 7:00pm 7:00pm to next 7am A Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA B Residential 55 dBA 50 dBA C Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA D1 Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA E Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA F Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA G Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA H1 Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA I1 Commercial 60 dBA 55 dBA 3.0 Sound Measurement Results Sound levels were measured for the following portions of a typical Autowash wash cycle, a. Initial vehicle entry into wash bay with pre-wash under carriage and vehicle spry. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building are open and Doors on the north side of the building are closed. b. Spray and Wash. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building and Doors on the north side of the building are closed. Exhibit BB - Page 3 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 4 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com c. Drying Operations. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building and Doors on the north side of the building are open. d. Vacuum Operations Table 3.1 summarizes Autowash sound levels at each measurement location and for each wash cycle. Table 3.2 indicates compliance or non-compliance with applicable noise limits (for any portion of the a wash cycle). Table 3.1: Measured Autowash Noise Levels Measurement Location Autowash Wash Cycle Portion, dBA Initial Spray Rinse and Wash Drying A 63 to 72 51 to 62 52 to 57 B 56 to 61 <50 to 61 <50 to 56 C <55 53 to 63 70 D1 68 to 70 57 to 63 50 to 54 D2 60 to 65 <50 to 58 <50 E <50 <50 <50 F <55 50 to 55 50 to 55 G 68 to 70 57 to 63 50 to 54 H1 <50 47 to 57 64 I1 <50 <50 <50 Notes: D1 = on Autowash side of noise wall. D2 = on Neighbor side of noise wall. H1 = extrapolated from Location C noise levels. I1 = extrapolated from Location C noise levels. Table 3.2: Compliance with Applicable Noise Limits Measurement Location Adjacent Property Zoning Noise Compliance Limits 7:00am to next 7:00pm 7:00pm to next 7am A Commercial No No B Residential No No C Commercial No No D1 Commercial No No D2 Commercial No No E Commercial Yes Yes F Commercial Yes No G Commercial No No H1 Commercial No No I1 Commercial Yes Yes Exhibit BB - Page 4 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 5 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Inspection of Tables 3.1 and 3.2 shows the following noise impacts from Autowash operations. Location A – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime commercial noise limits. Note: Autowash operations on the ‘neighbor’ side of the sound wall at Location A, can be extrapolated from the sound level difference between Locations D1 / D2, ~ 5 dBA lower. These reduced sound levels will still exceed the commercial noise limits. Location B – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime residential noise limits. Location C – sound levels from Autowash drying operations are clearly audible, however, noise from Autowash operations is below sound levels generated by vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., which are in the range of 70 to 85 dBA. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location D1 (Autowash side of noise fence) – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime commercial noise limits. Location D2 (Veterinary Clinic side of noise fence) – Autowash noise levels are in the range of 5 to 8 dBA lower on the residence side of the noise wall, then on the Autowash side of the wall. While being lower Autowash initial spray operations still exceed the Daytime and Nighttime commercial noise limits. Location D – vacuum operations (Autowash side of noise wall) are in the range of 55 to 62 dBA depending on the number of cars being vacuumed at one time. Location E – No audible sound impact from all Autowash operations. All car wash operations were less than 50 dBA. Location F – sound levels from Autowash drying operations are clearly audible, however, noise from Autowash operations is below sound levels generated by vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., which are in the range of 70 to 85 dBA. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location G – vacuum operations are in the range of 58 to 65 dBA depending on the number of cars being vacuumed at one time. Vacuum sounds are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime commercial noise limits. Note: Autowash operations on the ‘neighbor’ side of the sound wall at Location G, can be extrapolated from the sound level difference between Locations D1 / D2, ~ 5 dBA lower. These reduced sound levels will still exceed the commercial noise limits. Location H – sound levels from Autowash drying operations will be clearly audible and extrapolated noise levels are below Commercial property noise limits. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location I – sound levels from Autowash drying operations will be clearly audible and extrapolated noise levels are below Commercial property noise limits. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Exhibit BB - Page 5 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 6 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 3.0 Summary Noise impact from Autowash operations is limited to the buildings / properties directly south of the Autowash, specifically 4355 Gray St. and 4360 Gray St. For residences further south along Gray St. Autowash wash operations will still be audible, they are less than or nearly less than the Daytime and Nighttime residential noise limits. NOTE: Applicability of sound level measurement results The original intent of the sound level measurements was to test a ‘worse case’ operational scenario (all bays and all vacuums operating simultaneously. This operational scenario is not a realistic measure of ‘typical’ Autowash operations and hence sound levels. The measurements were completed for e “typical’ Autowash operations, and since the ‘typical’ Autowash exceed compliance noise limits at some of the measurement locations, the worst-case scenario was not necessary. 4.0 Observation and Mitigation Recommendations Autowash noise level impact on adjacent properties can be reduced with the following mitigation measures. 1. Limit the hours of operation. Limiting the hours of operation from, for example, 7am to 10pm, will eliminate nighttime noise impacts, 2. Modification to the Existing Noise Walls Inspection of the noise wall and as seen in Figures 1.5.1 and 1.5.2 shows, a. The existing noise wall height is insufficient to provide adequate Autowash sound attenuation. The noise wall should have been constructed at least 4-feet higher, so that from the Autowash vehicle entry doors the roof gutter of the residence at 4355 Gray St. is not visible from the Autowash. b. The existing noise wall construction is steel tubing with ¾-inch plywood / OSB and faux (plastic) bricks on the Autowash side. This construction is insufficient and cannot provide adequate sound attenuation for Autowash noise. c. Ensure that the north and south doors remain closed during ALL washing and drying cycles. If you have any questions, please contact me at our Englewood office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING DYNAMICS, INC. Stuart D. McGregor, P.E. President Exhibit BB - Page 6 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 7 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Figure 1.1: Autowash Sound Level Measurement Locations Exhibit BB - Page 7 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 8 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Figure 1.5.1: Autowash Noise Wall from the north side of the wall. Figure 1.5.2: Autowash Noise Wall from Southwest side showing Construction Exhibit BB - Page 8 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 9 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheat Ridge – Noise Ordinance ec. 16-103 Sec. 16-103. Unreasonable noise; disturbing the peace. (a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: Amplified sound shall mean the use or operation of any loudspeaker, public address system, or other sound amplifying equipment for the purpose of giving instructions, directions, talks, addresses or lectures, or for transmitting music or sound to any persons or assemblages of persons outdoors. Amplified sound shall not include sound which is not audible two hundred (200) feet, measured at any point along the property line or within the property line, from the receiving premises. Amplified sound event shall mean an outdoor event at which amplified sound is permitted pursuant to this section. Event location shall mean the real property owned or legally occupied by the permittee at which an amplified sound event is held, extending to the exterior property lines thereof. In the case of a residential neighborhood "block party" or similar function, the event location shall be the public street used for the event. Sound-amplifying equipment shall mean any machine or device for the amplification of a human voice, music or any other sound, or by which the human voice, music or any other sound is amplified. noise shall mean noise generally associated with transportation regulated by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Some construction noise can also be classified as unavoidable and is regulated elsewhere. Unreasonable noise shall mean any noise, which because of its loudness and frequency, while taking into consideration its location and the nature of the typical urban environment, unreasonably disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace or safety of reasonable persons of ordinary sensitivity or causes damage to any property or business. (b) Unlawful noise; residential and commercial properties. It is unlawful for any person to make, continue or cause to be made or to permit or assist another to make, continue or cause to be made, any unreasonable noise which, under all of the circumstances presented, would annoy, injure or endanger the comfort, repose or peace of a person of ordinary sensitivities including but not limited to the following: the sounding of any horn, signaling device, or similar device on any automobile, motorcycle or other vehicle; any amplified signal from any bell, chime, siren, whistle or similar device intended for nonemergency purposes; any signaling device including fire, burglar, siren, whistle unless in an emergency; radios, televisions, boom boxes, phonographs, stereos, musical instruments and similar devices. Unavoidable noise does not qualify as unreasonable noise. The foregoing noises and circumstances shall be deemed as unreasonable: (1) Any unreasonable noise or sound which is audible one hundred (100) or more feet from a mobile noise or sound source. (2) Any unreasonable noise or sound which is audible within a private residence that the person responsible for the sound has no right to occupy, specifically including but not limited to apartments, common interest communities and other multiunit dwelling structures. (3) Any unreasonable noise, sound source or any person or group of persons engaged in loud and continuing activities which are audible and measured at any point along the property line or within the property line of the receiving premises, continuing for a minimum of fifteen (15) minutes in a two (2) hour period. Exhibit BB - Page 9 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 10 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com (4) Any person performing or permitting the performance of trash pickup with a truck which has a compactor or the capacity to raise and dump dumpsters in any area zoned for residential uses between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. For purposes of this paragraph, testimony that the name of a business which holds itself out as being in the business of trash hauling was written on the trash truck shall be prima facie evidence that the trash truck was owned by and under the control of the employer so identified. (c) Unlawful noise; industrial properties. It shall be unlawful for any person to emit or cause to be emitted any noise which leaves the premises on which it originates, crosses a property line, and enters onto any other premises in excess of the sound pressure levels during the time periods as specified in table A. (1) The noise source shall be measured at any point along the property line or within the property line of the receiving premises to determine compliance with this section. (2) The decibel level of any noise regulated on a decibel basis by this article shall be measured by a sound level meter. The test results shall be evidence if administered in conformance with the American National Standards Institute. In order to implement and enforce this article effectively, the chief of police shall promulgate standards and procedures for using and testing sound level meters used in the enforcement of this article. Table A: Allowable Noise Levels (in DBA) with Time of Day Allowance Receptor premises 7:00 a.m.—10:00 p.m./10:00 p.m.—7:00 a.m. Source premises Residential Commercial Industrial Industrial 55/50 65/60 80/75 (3) Notwithstanding the foregoing, a business owner in an industrial zone district, upon which there exists a noise source in operation at the time this subsection 16-103(c) becomes effective, may apply to the city manager for a permit for a different decibel level, requirement, and/or time limitation specific to such real property. Such real property owner will submit the following to the city manager as an application for such permit: a. A written request for the decibel level, time and day of week limitations and other elements of the permit desired. b. A noise study prepared by a licensed professional engineer supporting the ability of the applicant to comply with the permit levels and conditions requested or to be imposed. c. Any other documents required by the city manager to render the application complete. The city manager will review the application materials and meet with the applicant within thirty (30) days of such submittal, and shall recommend to city council approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the application by city council. the decision of city council shall be the final decision of the city, subject to judicial appeal. Permit conditions may include, but are not limited to: permitted decibel level(s), time and day of week limitations, term of permit and whether renewal periods are permitted, neighborhood outreach and education, contact for complaints, and authority for the city manager to revoke the permit for failure to comply with limitations and conditions. If the city council approves the permit the city manager will issue the permit. (d) Permit for outdoor amplified sound event. No person shall conduct an outdoor amplified sound event, without first obtaining a permit to do so. The event sponsor must apply for and receive a permit for the event, on forms provided by the city clerk. An outdoor amplified sound event is permitted under this section under the following conditions: (1) A maximum of eight (8) permits may be issued for the same location during a single calendar year, by the city clerk, subject to the conditions and restrictions in subsection 16-103(d)(3) below. Exhibit BB - Page 10 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 11 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com (2) If an applicant wishes to obtain permits for more than eight (8) outdoor amplified sound events at the same location during a single calendar year, an application for all such proposed events must be made to and acted upon by the city manager or designee and, upon appeal, by the city council under the following procedures: a. The application shall be filed with the city manager. b. A neighborhood meeting on the application shall be held by the applicant, upon ten (10) days written notice to all businesses and residents within three hundred (300) feet of the exterior property line of the proposed event location. c. The city manager may grant, grant with conditions, or deny the application, in whole or in part, and in doing so may apply the following criteria, in addition to other site-specific considerations: 1. Proximity of the proposed outdoor amplified sound events to residential neighborhoods, medical facilities and schools; 2. The applicant's history of past compliance with the requirements of this section; 3. The hardship to the applicant, the community and other persons of not granting the permit against the adverse impact on the health, safety and welfare of persons affected. d. The decision of the city manager may be appealed within seven (7) days of the decision date by the applicant or any resident or business owner within three hundred (300) feet of the event location by filing written notice of the same with the city manager. e. The city council shall conduct a public hearing on the appeal, following notice to the applicant and any resident or business owner within three hundred (300) feet of the event location. the council may uphold, modify, or reverse the city manager's decision, in whole or in part. f. The decision of the city manager, or if appealed, the council, shall be the final decision of the city, subject to judicial appeal. (3) All outdoor amplified sound event permits, shall be subject to the following requirements in addition to those imposed by the city manager in each case: a. The application shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the approving authority after review by the police department and any other city department as appropriate. b. No outdoor amplified sound event permit may be issued for an event outside of the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Within this time range, outdoor amplified sound events may be limited in duration as determined by the approving authority. c. The permit shall not authorize, allow, or otherwise permit the production, reproduction, or amplification of sound which exceeds seventy-five (75) dBA when measured from the nearest receiving property. d. Conditions may be imposed on the permit to address the nature and location of the specific event. Failure of the permittee to comply with the conditions may result in the permit being revoked. e. The police department shall have authority to require the permittee to reduce the sound volume, curtail the hours of the event, or close the event entirely, if the sound level at the event, evaluated at the property line of the complaining party constitutes, in the police department's sound judgment, unreasonable noise. Exhibit BB - Page 11 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 12 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com (4) An outdoor amplified sound event for which a permit has been issued shall be exempt from the provisions of (b)(1), (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section. (e) Noise caused in the performance of emergency work for the immediate safety, health, or welfare of the community or individuals of the community, or to restore property to a safe condition following a public calamity shall not be subject to the provisions of this section. (f) Any member of the police department who personally observes a violation of this section may serve as the complaining party in the prosecution of such violation, regardless of whether the officer's observation was initiated by the complaint of another party. (g) Any activity or noise source conducted or caused by an activity conducted or sponsored or approved by the city shall be exempt from the requirements of this section. (h) Enforcement. The city may cancel, revoke, suspend or summarily suspend the business license of any business which permits noise in violation of this section, pursuant to the procedures in Code sections 11-30 through 11-32. (Code 1977, § 14-44.2; Ord. No. 1346, § 1, 6-13-05; Ord. No. 1697, § 1, 8-24-20; Ord. No. 1708, § 1, 2-22-21; Ord. No. 1713, §§ 1, 3, 5-24-21) Ord. No. 1708, adopted February 22, 2021, changed the effective date for subsection 16-103(c) from February 28, 2021 to October 1, 2021. All other portions of section 16-103, as amended by Ord. No. 1697, remain in effect as of September 18, 2020. Ord. No. 1713, adopted May 24, 2021, is effective as of June 11, 2021, provided, however, holders of outdoor amplified sound event permits issued prior to the effective date hereof shall be entitled to: (1) rely on such permits as valid for the entire calendar year 2021, and (2) apply for no more than two (2) additional permits for calendar year 2021 pursuant to section 16-103(d)(1) as revised hereby. Exhibit BB - Page 12 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 13 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Exhibit BB - Page 13 of 14 City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 5 April 2026 Page 14 of 14 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com Exhibit BB - Page 14 of 14 441 City of at Ri Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P. 303.234.5900 F: 303.234.5924 NOTICE OF VIOLATION - ACTION REQUIRED COMPLIANCE DUE DATE: ADG/CASE REPORT # LOCATION OF VIOLATION: DATE MAILED DATE OBSERVED TIME OBSERVED • Posted on Property DATE Personally Served ZI NAME/ADDRESS OF OWNER(S) OF RECORD OCCUPANT/ RESIDENT RESIDENT/OWNER/OCCUPANT: described City Municipal Code be issued. Continued summons and Inspector listed You are hereby notified that the above property is in violation of the below of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code sections. If the cited violations are not corrected and in compliance with by the RE-INSPECTION DATE of , a citation with a fine of $150 will non-compliance may result in additional fines of $250, $500, and/or issuance of a Municipal Court abatement of the violations. Questions may be directed to the Community Services Officer of Property below. Wheat Ridge Municipal Code Section VIOLATION Wheat Ridge Municipal Code Section VIOLATION 15-15 Unlawful Acts 5-76 International Building Code 15-24 Littering 5-82 International Property Maintenance Code 15-25 Unlawful Activities 5-85 International Residential Code 24-51 Weed Control 26-26-501 Off-Street Parking 26-26-621 Residential Parking Required Corrections: Officer/Inspector: Phone: (303) 235- Date Exhibit CC - Page 1 of 1 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Uniform Summons & Complaint or Penalty Assessment Case # Summons # Date of Violation (mm/dd/yyyy) / 1 Time of Violation am pm Approximate Location of Violation Direction of Travel N S - - E W • Domestic Violence r • Aggressive Driving O Traffic Accident 0 Construction Zone 1 D Traffic • Injuries involved • School Zone ' • VRA Crime (Victim Witness) D Penal • Interpreter D Spanish D Other THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BY AND ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO VS. Defendant (Last name) (First) , .1 q Date of Birth (nrim/ddiyyyy) • i Defendant's Address City State Zip Phone El Residence 13 Business 0 Mottle 0 Opt-In Defendant's Employer Address Occupation Phone ID Residence p Business 13 Mottle El Opt-In Driver's License Number • COL Class State Race Sex Height Weight hi.r.nr Eyes Registered Owner (Name & Address) same as above Vehicle License Number/Type State Vehicle Year Make Model Color VIN Model Traffic Code Section Violation PTS CC Wheat Ridge City Code Violation Wheat Ridge City Code Violation CI 107 DISREGARD POLICE OFFICER 3 900 CI 16-21 ASSAULT 0 15-15( ) UNLAWFUL ACTS 0 202 DROVE DEFECTIVE VEHICLE 13 16-41 THEFT 0 15-19 ( ) DEFACING PROPERTY DEFECTIVE $ FINE 542 El 16-43 CRIMINAL MISCHIEF 13 15-24( ) LITTERING 0 235 SAFETY VIOLATIONS, FAILED TO MAINTAIN SAFETY STANDARDS D 16-46 TRESPASSING 0 15-25 ( ) UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES COUNTS $ FINE , 0 713 El 16-48 CRIMINAL TAMPERING 0 17-25 PARK HOURS D 507 OVERWEIGHT, AXLE WEIGHT LOS G•it.A 0 16/101 (a)( )DISORDERLY CONDUCT 0 24-51 ( ) WEED AND TALL GRASS CONTROL $ FINE 522 , ,16-103 DISTURBING THE PEACE 13 26-501 OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS El 508 OVERWEIGHT, GROSS WEIGHT LBS OVER"ii 16-107 ( )( ) HARASSMENT 0 26-621 ( ) RESIDENTIAL PARKING $ FINE 52.3 0 16-110 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 0 4-8 ANIMAL RUNNING AT LARGE 13 603 FAILED TO OBSERVE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE 4 300 13 16-111 VIOLATION OF RESTRAINING ORDER 0 4-9 ANIMAL DISTURBANCE OR NUISANCE 13 604(1)(c)(I) TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL LEGEND 4 10 16-113 ( )( ) SALES AND SOLICITATION 13 4-10 ( a ) RABIES CONTROL 0 702 VEHICLE TURNING LEFT 3 278 0 16-114 ( ) AGGRESSIVE SOLICITATION 04-11 ANIMAL CRUELTY OR INHUMANE TREATMENT 13 l(13 DISREGARDED/FAILED TO STOP FOR STOP SIGN 4 319 D 16-131 (b) POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA 13 4-15 VICIOUS ANIMALS CI 704 ENTERING HIGHWAY FROM PRIVATE DRIVE 3 374 0 16-131(c) PUBLIC DISPLAY OR CONSUMPTION OF MARIJUANA 13 4.17 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF DANGEROUS DOG CI 901 POSMON AND METHOD OF MAKING TURN 3 0 16-132 POSSESSION OF INJECTION DEVICES El 4.18 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF AGGRESSIVE DOG 0 1007 ( ) DRMNG ON ROADWAYS LANED FOR TRAFFIC El 16-133 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA 13 4-31 DOG AND CAT LICENSES El 1008 FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 4 142 0 16-156 ( ) INTERFERENCE o 13 1101 SPEEDING MPH INA MPH ZONE 13 16-177 POSSESSION OF ALCOHOL BY MINOR El 1401 RECKLESS DRIVING 8 140 ,0 POWS CODE El 1402 CARELESS DRIVING 4 '0 POWs CODE El 1409 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COMPULSORY INSURANCE 4 0 POWs CODE 0 1416 DRIVING THROUGH PRIVATE PROPERTY/ DRIVEWAYS o FINE 3 POINTS TOTALS BEFORE EARLY PAYMENT DISCOUNT: D 1903 VEHICLE PASSED STOPPED SCHOOLBUS 6 420 • Fingerprinted • Photographed Fingerprint # CMV USDOT # E CMV Req. CDL D Custodial Arrest Total Number of Charges G PENALTY ASSESSMENT SUMMONS II Valid CO DL If this box is checked, you are permitted to accept the penalty assessment noted on the front of the summons Traffic Infraction Offense without a court appearance. The Court must receive your payment in full and signed guilty plea prior to your Without admitting guilt I promise to appear at the time and place scheduled Court date. A court appearance may result in additional court costs, a higher fine, and the assessment , indicated below, of the original points. The Court reserves the right to review your driving record and rescind or overrule the reduced fines and points pursuant to this early payment option. X _ Notice: See instructions on reverse side titled "Summons" EARLY PAYMENT DISCOUNT: Total Total I D Points l Amount . Due $ Assessed You are summoned and ordered to appear to answer charges The undersigned has cause to believe that the defendant noted above in: Wheat Ridge Municipal Court, 7500 W. 29th Avenue, Whez, Ridge, CO 80033 303-235-2835 probable committed the offense(s) against the peace and dignity of the People of the State of Colorado and affirms that a copy of this Summons & Complaint or Penalty Assessment was served upon the defendant. Officer (print) Badge # . On (t) / l.A 1 i ' . at am or .., Officer signature RI,jht Index Fln9er Warning: If you fail to appear in response to this summons as ordered, a warrant may be issued for your arrest, your driving wivileges may be suspended and additional costs assessed. '"---- ---x-------- Date Issued: I i —7 I - ,7i - 2 7 .- % THIS IS A LEGAL DOCUMENT — READ BOTH SIDES Revised 06-12-2020 DEFENDANT COPY Exhibit DD - Page 1 of 2 Additional information may be obtained on the City of Wheat Ridge website 4,7!: SUMMONS: You are summoned and ordered to appear in Wheat Ridge Municipal Court, 7500 W 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033, on the date and time listed on the front of the summons. Defendants under the age of 18 years.of age must appear with a parent or legal guardian. The Wheat Ridge Municipal Court is located at W. 29th Avenue and Wadsworth Blvd., Wheat Ridge, Colorado. PENALTY ASSESSMENT: This may not apply to your case. Read your summons carefully. You may either appear as noted above or accept the penalty assessment stated on the front of the summons. The Court must receive your payment in full and signed guilty plea prior to your scheduled court date. To accept the penalty assessment, you may pay online by credit card (Visa or MasterCard) on the City of Wheat Ridge website sv.c'., 9,<Cv.t.i. Make check or money order payable to the "City of Wheat Ridge" and mail payment to Wheat Ridge Municipal Court, 7500 W 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. Credit cards (Visa or MasterCard) are accepted by phone (303-235-2835) or in person at the Court Clerk's Office. A court appearance may result in additional court costs, higher fines, and the assessment of the original points. The Court reserves the right to review your driving record and rescind or overrule the reduced fines and points pursuant to this early payment option. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR ON YOUR SCHEDULED COURT DATE AND/OR FAIL TO PAY PRIOR TO YOUR SCHEDULED COURT DATE, you will be subjected to at least one of the following consequences: (1) a warrant. may be issued for your arrest; (2) you may be required to post a cash or surety bond; (3) a .default judgment with fines and costs may be entered against you; (4) points against your driver's license may be reported to the Colorado State Department of Motor Vehicles; (5) a hold may be placed on your driver's license and may result in suspension of your driver's license. DEFENDANT'S RIGHTS In most cases, you have the right to: • Hire an attorney to represent you before this Court. • A short postponement to seek legal assistance before entering a plea. • Request that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you, if you are indigent, complete an application, and are charged with an offense for which there is the possibility of a jail sentence. Traffic infractions do not carry this right. • Be advised of the charge(s) against you and the maximum penalty which may be imposed upon a guilty or no contest plea, or a conviction. Maximum penalties. are up to a $2,650.00 fine and up to 364 days in jail. • Be presumed innocent until every element of the crime has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. • A trial to Court (Judge) and, for certain offenses (including a general •criminal offense violation or a traffic offense), you have the . right to a trial to jury. If you have the right to a jury trial, a written jury demand and a jury deposit of $25.00 must be received within twenty-one (21) days after your not guilty plea has been entered. The Judge will advise you if you are entitled to a jury trial. Subpoena witnesses on your behalf. The Clerk of Court can provide subpoenas. • Testify or not, you may remain silent at trial. • • • Cross-examine (ask questions of) any witness called to testify against you.. • Appeal any judgment of this Court to the District Court of Jefferson County within thirty flve (35) days of judgMent, • Be tried within ninety-one (91) days of your not guilty plea unless you have requested a pre-trial conference, .dispositional hearing, delayed the proceedings, failed to appear in Court, or waived your right to a speedy trial. • • Enter a voluntary guilty plea which is not the result of undue influence or coercion. • Post bond, if bail has been set. FOR PENATLY ASSESSMENT ONLY: I, the undersigned, dö hereby enter my appearance on this complaint for the offense(s) charged on the face of this summons, I have been informed of my rights, and understand that a record of this conviction will be sent to the Colorado State Department of Motor Vehicles, or the licensing authority of the state where I received my license to .drive. My signature to this plea of guilty will have the same effect as a judgment of the Court I do hereby plead guilty to the infractions(s) charged, waive my tights and agree to pay all fines and costs, Defendant's Signature Revised: 06-12-2020 Date DEFENDANT COPY -2 Exhibit DD - Page 2 of 2 From: Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 4:17 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: Carwash SUP & Sound Study Hello Lauren- I just wanted to let you know that we did receive the scope of work back from the sound engineer (see attached). As you requested, I'd like to see about setting up a three-way-call so we can ensure this is in alignment with the needs of the SUP committee. What dates/times work best for you next week? We will be at a conference on Tuesday and Wednesday but can be fairly flexible for the remainder of the week. Erin Dreeszen Founder, Chief of Staff Autowash Companies (O) 303.927.9061 (C) 720.616.9072 www.AutowashCo.com "Be curious - not judgmental." - Walt Whitman, Ted Lasso From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 12:56 PM To: Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: Carwash SUP & Sound Study Erin, Thank you for this update and for taking swift and meaningful on multiple fronts. Connecting with a sound engineer and preparing a project scope is exactly what we hoped to see. We look forward to reviewing the proposal and coordinating a conversation with your consultant to ensure alignment. Your adjustment to site hours is also appreciated. We understand that managing this transition manually can be complex. Please share updates as you transition to an automated system. Exhibit EE - Page 1 of 10 The sound study remains the key next step. Once the study is complete, we’ll use its findings—alongside the SUP criteria outlined in your original approval—to assess what decibel levels exist in the surrounding area and how they could be mitigated. Unfortunately, the SUP criteria are inherently subjective, so I don’t have specific decibel targets in mind at this time. I’m happy to discuss those criteria further once the study is underway and we have noise readings to discuss. To that end, please keep us posted as soon as the scope is ready so we can calendar a meeting with your sound engineer soon. Thank you, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 10:02 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: Carwash SUP & Sound Study Hi Lauren, Caution:This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit EE - Page 2 of 10 I wanted to follow up on my previous email as we have made several meaningful strides since our last communication and have not yet received clarity on our previous questions for the SUP evaluation criteria to help expidite a resolution. Thank you, Jana, for your response, I do think we need to investigate ways to absorb sound and hopefully the engineer will be helpful in that regard. Here are a few key updates: Sound Mitigation: We have moved forward with the purchase of manufacturer-recommended sound dampening equipment for our vacuum system. Installation will be underway as soon as these materials are recieved as part of our commitment to reduce any perceived impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Sound Study: We’ve successfully connected with a sound engineer who is preparing a formal project scope and quote, which we expect to receive in the next few days. We reached out to two other consultants, but unfortunately, neither responded. Once we receive his scope of work proposal, we will share it with your team and facilitate a joint conversation between the city and the engineer to ensure alignment on scope and methodology. Operating Hours: While we await further guidance from Community Development and the Police Department, we’ve voluntarily adjusted our site hours to 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM to ensure we remain compliant with the city’s sound ordinance. This adjustment is being managed manually for now, as an automated software solution is still in development. We kindly ask for some understanding in the event of any minor errors during this transitional period, as shutting down a car wash is more complex than simply locking a door. We remain committed to being proactive and collaborative throughout this process. However, we are still seeking clarification on how SUP compliance will be evaluated beyond the sound study. Objective guidelines will be much easier for us to plan around in a timely manner. Any information or direction you can provide on that would be greatly appreciated. Please let us know if you have any questions - I will reach out again as soon as I receive the information back from the sound engineer. Erin Dreeszen Founder, Chief of Staff Autowash Companies (O) 303.927.9061 (C) 720.616.9072 www.AutowashCo.com "Be curious - not judgmental." - Walt Whitman, Ted Lasso Exhibit EE - Page 3 of 10 From: Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com> Sent: Friday, May 2, 2025 12:20 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: Carwash SUP & Sound Study Hi Lauren, Thank you for the follow-up and for outlining the city’s perspective regarding the special use permit (SUP) and the sound study requirement. We are committed to addressing this concern in good faith and appreciate the opportunity to better understand the city’s expectations. We are actively working to secure a qualified sound consultant and will notify you once selected so that we can schedule the joint meeting you referenced. In parallel, we are also exploring operational and equipment modifications to reduce potential impact on the surrounding neighborhood, some of which is already on order and will be installed as soon as possible - ideally prior to the sound study. That said, I want to express some concern and seek clarity around how compliance will ultimately be evaluated. Based on your explanation, it appears that even if the sound study finds our operations fall within the city’s established noise ordinance, the SUP can still be revoked if the city subjectively determines there is a broader detrimental impact. As a small, local business trying to be responsive and responsible, this creates a great deal of uncertainty for us. To help us move forward in a productive and informed manner, could you please clarify the following: 1.What specific criteria or conditions—beyond the objective noise ordinance—will be used to determine whether we are in compliance with the SUP? 2.How will the “contextual impacts” be evaluated or defined? Are there measurable thresholds, or is this entirely at the city’s discretion? 3.Will the findings of the sound study be determinative, or simply one factor in the city’s judgment? 4.In the event we take proactive steps (e.g., equipment upgrades, scheduling changes) based on sound study findings, will that be considered sufficient to maintain our SUP, assuming no new complaints arise? We hope to continue collaborating with the city in a transparent and solution-oriented way and would appreciate any guidance that helps us align our efforts with what’s expected. Exhibit EE - Page 4 of 10 Erin Dreeszen Founder, Chief of Staff Autowash Companies (O) 303.927.9061 (C) 720.616.9072 www.AutowashCo.com "Be curious - not judgmental." - Walt Whitman, Ted Lasso From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Friday, May 2, 2025 10:05 AM To: Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: Carwash SUP & Sound Study Erin, Thank you for the update and for your continued efforts to address the noise concerns at the carwash site. We appreciate you exploring options with your programming team to limit operations during overnight hours. That said, the sound study is still necessary. While compliance with the City’s noise ordinance is one component of the broader conversation, the special use permit (SUP) represents a higher threshold. The SUP approval was based on an understanding that the use would not create detrimental impacts to the surrounding area—beyond what can be measured at a single point in time or just at the property line. We’ve received multiple complaints alleging that the carwash is having a broader noise impact on the neighborhood. These concerns must be addressed through the SUP process, which allows the City to consider Exhibit EE - Page 5 of 10 cumulative, contextual impacts—something that can’t be fully captured through a single decibel reading or a single operational scenario. Because of the complaints, it is my duty to investigate and enforce the SUP. Here are the code excerpts I’m referencing: Purpose. Special uses are discretionary uses which, if properly designed, developed, operated and maintained, may be approved for any specific location within a zone district wherein the special use is enumerated. The primary issues to be addressed are those related to justification of need and special design and operational considerations which mitigate potential detrimental impacts of a special use on surrounding land uses, the street system, or public services or facilities. In order to protect the public interest, a special use may be approved, approved with modifications or denied. Previously approved special use permits may be revoked pursuant to subsection F. F. Enforcement. All conditions and stipulations imposed by the community development director or city council shall be maintained during the entire term of the special use. If at any time the stipulations or conditions are not adhered to or are found to have been materially altered in scope, application or design, the director of community development shall investigate and, if appropriate, initiate revocation proceedings which shall include the following: 1. Notice of violation following procedures as set forth, in sections 26-1005 or 26-1006 of this Code. 2. Upon a finding of noncompliance after the prescribed correction date, the community development director shall schedule a revocation hearing before the city council. The purpose of the revocation hearing shall be for the city council to hear evidence concerning the nature and extent of the alleged noncompliance with the conditions of the special use permit. The council shall have the power, upon good cause being shown, to cancel or revoke the previously issued special use permit, to require certain corrective measures to be taken, and/or to direct the city's agents to enter upon the premises and take corrective measures required by the city council, and to modify the conditions which apply to the special use permit. After internal discussion, it was decided that the most objective and fair approach to ensure the carwash can meet the SUP criteria would be through a professional sound study. The sound study will provide objective, comprehensive data about noise levels at various locations and under different operating conditions. Just as importantly, it will inform what specific mitigation measures are needed to resolve the issue long-term and retain the SUP approval. Please let us know once you’ve identified a consultant so we can schedule a joint meeting with you and our team. Thank you, Exhibit EE - Page 6 of 10 Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com> Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2025 5:13 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: Carwash SUP & Sound Study Hello Lauren- After leaving the meeting with the city prosecutor this morning it was made clear that we are in compliance with the city noise ordinance from 7am - 10pm daily. It is the evening hours that lead to us not being in compliance due to sound mitigation efforts we have already installed and had tested by the police department. I have copied Officer Trujillo here as she was also part of the conversation. I am writing because Dennis and I are communicating with the programming team (third party) to see if we can shut the site down during the afterhours times. If we are shutting down by choice to insure compliance from 10pm - 7am, would we still need to consider the sound study? Caution:This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit EE - Page 7 of 10 Erin Dreeszen Founder, Chief of Staff Autowash Companies (O) 303.927.9061 (C) 720.616.9072 www.AutowashCo.com "Be curious - not judgmental." - Walt Whitman, Ted Lasso From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2025 4:11 PM To: Dennis Dreeszen <dennis@autowashco.com>; Erin Dreeszen <erin@autowashco.com> Cc: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Carwash SUP & Sound Study Erin and Dan, First, I want to introduce myself as I don’t believe we’ve had the chance to meet in person yet. I’m Lauren Mikulak, the Community Development Director. My department processed your special use permit, site plan, and building permit for the carwash at 5900 W. 44th Avenue. I’m aware of the noise violation that was issued for your property and the recent neighbor complaints communicated to City Council. This morning, the city prosecutor informed me that you were in municipal court and discussed with her a few approaches to mitigate impacts, including a sound study. As you know, the carwash was originally approved with a special use permit or “SUP” (that approval is attached). You may have learned through that process in 2022-2023 that a special use is one which is acknowledged to have potential operational impacts and which may or may not be approved depending on the specific context, impacts, and operational characteristics. We supported the application for several reasons: location, context, design, and its prior use as a carwash. When a use approved through an SUP ends up having impacts or deviates from the approval, it can be subject to additional review and the municipal code even gives City Council the authority to revoke the approval. (This is in subsection F of Section 26-114 in the municipal code.) Exhibit EE - Page 8 of 10 I share this in the interest of full transparency, but our goal is to work with you, so we don’t reach that point. I appreciate the effort you have made over the last few weeks to contain the carwash noise to comply with the City’s noise ordinance and prescriptive decibel levels. I am requesting that you engage a consultant within the next two weeks who is qualified to complete a sound study. The sound study will be an important next step because the special use permit allows and requires that we assess impacts more comprehensively (not just at the property line). The sound study will be important in documenting the decibel levels at different locations in the surrounding area and during different operational scenarios (e.g., vacuums, one bay running, multiple bays running, etc.). The sound study will also be key in identifying specific mitigation improvements that can be made to ensure a long-term resolution. When you engage a sound consultant, our request is to meet with you and them to help communicate what will be necessary in the scope of the sound study. The data gathered through the sound study and the completion of the study’s recommended mitigation will be necessary to retain the special use permit. The SUP was approved with the understanding that the business would not have a detrimental or adverse impact on the surrounding area (refer to the first three findings in the attached approval). The SUP submittals showed the carwash equipment contained within the bays with closed doors on both sides of the bay. I understand you’ve communicated that this is not operationally feasible, so the sound study will be critical in determining how you will otherwise modify the site to mitigate noise impacts. Copied here is our Planning Manager, Jana Easley, whom you met a couple of weeks ago and whose division oversees special use permits. Please confirm your receipt of this message. Please also engage a consultant and reach out to me and Jana by Friday, May 16 with their name and availability so we can coordinate a meeting with all parties—us, you, and the sound consultant. Let us know if you have any questions. Thank you, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone: 303-235-2845 Exhibit EE - Page 9 of 10 Fax: 303-235-2845 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. Don't forget to follow our Social Media Accounts! CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Exhibit EE - Page 10 of 10 City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us September 30, 2025 John Peckler Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 Denver, CO 80203-4554 Muth Properties LLC 26201 W 108th St Olathe, KS 66061 Subject: Notice of Special Use Permit Noncompliance – Lakeside Autowash SENT VIA EMAIL Dear Mr. Peckler and Autowash Team, The City is in receipt of your letter dated September 26, 2025. We appreciate the commitments outlined in your correspondence, including the voluntary continuation of the suspension of operations until installation of the sound fence, as well as the commitment to retest sound levels using the same methodology and to share those results with the City. These steps are important to advancing resolution of the concerns identified in the Notice of Noncompliance. As you move forward, please keep the City informed regarding scheduling and progress on installation of the sound fence and the subsequent retesting. Before recommencing public operations, please contact us so that we can confirm that the required steps have been completed. For clarity, the June 24 Notice of Noncompliance will not be withdrawn at this time. Rather, the City will hold it in abeyance pending completion of the commitments described in your September 26 letter and this correspondence. If this letter raises questions, please reach out. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak, AICP Community Development Director Exhibit FF - Page 1 of 2 2 cc: Evan Singleton Dennis Dreeszen Erin Dreeszen Jeff Kwolkosi City Attorney City Manager Planning Manager SUP case file Exhibit FF - Page 2 of 2 1 From:Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov> Sent:Friday, November 7, 2025 12:26 PM To:Peckler, John; Lauren Mikulak Cc:Singleton, Evan; JeffK@waveengineering.us; dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; Gerald Dahl Subject:[EXTERNAL] RE: Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study [Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or attachments unless you are sure it is trusted. Hi John, et al, Lauren and I are both at conferences, and Jerry is out of office. However, I’ve reviewed the updated sound study. It appears that the carwash is generally meeting the dB unless all 4 dryers and all 3 vacuums are being run simultaneously. I agree that would be atypical based on what I’ve seen at another of their locations. I also noted that M4 and M5 were not retested; I assume those would be exactly where the wall was built and that new testing would be on the north side of the new wall. M1, M2 and M3 are on site and also were not tested. Based on the offsite readings you’ve provided, we can clear you to open the west three bays during the restricted hours (7 AM to 10 PM). We’ll continue to monitor. If we continue to receive complaints, it’s helpful that we have this revised sound study. If we determine based on our own dB readings the wash doesn’t seem to be in compliance, we will reach back out. We greatly appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Please stay in touch regarding future sound readings and the fourth bay. Thanks, Jana Jana Easley, AICP Planning Manager Phone: 303-235-2844 jeasley@wheatridge.gov From: Peckler, John <jpeckler@spencerfane.com> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2025 10:36 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Cc:Singleton, Evan <esingleton@spencerfane.com>; JeffK@waveengineering.us; Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov>; dennis@autowashco.com; erin@autowashco.com; Gerald Dahl <gdahl@mdbrlaw.com> Subject: RE: Lakeside Autowash / Sound Study Importance: High Caution:This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit GG - Page 1 of 2 2 Lauren, The sound engineer completed the follow up sound measurements at 8:00 pm on November 5th. Attached for your prompt review are the results of those measurements. Autowash respectfully requests that the city approve the operation of the 3 western bays. In this scenario, the measured sound levels at all locations are below or within 1 dba of the allowable decibel levels under the City’s municipal code. The 1 dba exceedance was measured using the “worst case scenario” with all 3 vacuums and all 3 western bay dryers running simultaneously. During real world operations it is unlikely that this scenario would frequently occur. The length of a dryer cycle is approximately 1.83 minutes, and the max number of cars that can pass through the carwash per hour is 6. Therefore, if all 3 bays of the carwash are running at 100% capacity, approximately 1.202 minutes per hour all 3 dryers will be running at the same time. The measured levels also include all 3 vacuums running at the same time, which is even less likely to happen with all three bays running. As a point of reference, the state noise statute recognizes the fluctuations of sound and allows for a 10 dba exceedance of any limit if the exceedance does not last longer than fifteen minutes in any one-hour period. To the extent that it occurs, any exceedance at the car wash would be 1 dba and last for 1.202 minutes per hour. I also want to point out that the ambient sound in this area includes unavoidable noise from traffic, which constantly fluctuates throughout the day and can easily exceed the level of sound being made by the carwash. Based on the above, Autowash believes that operating 3 bays will not cause unreasonable levels of noise when taking into account the urban environment including other unavoidable ambient noises and the fact that any potential exceedance of the City’s noise standard in the “worst case scenario” would be 1dba over the limit and last for approximately 1.202 minutes per hour. Autowash would appreciate the city’s response before the 5:00 pm today so that it can open the 3 bays of the carwash for the weekend. I also want to let the city know that Autowash continues to evaluate additional noise mitigation measures with the goal of returning to all 4 bays being open and 24-hour operations. Best regards, John John Peckler Attorney Spencer Fane LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000 | Denver, CO 80203 O 303.839.3983 jpeckler@spencerfane.com | spencerfane.com Exhibit GG - Page 2 of 2 May 1, 2024 Cole Haselip Management Analyst City of Wheat Ridge 7490 W. 45th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: Silver Bullet Shooting Range – Noise Study Report Wave #3110 Dear Cole, Wave Engineering has evaluated noise from Silver Bullet Shooting Range at 5901 West 38th Avenue in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Residential neighbors have complained about gunshot noise from the shooting range. We measured sound levels around the Silver Bullet building and near neighbors to the north and evaluated potential ways to mitigate sound that is audible at the neighbors’ homes. We understand that the city is working together with Silver Bullet and the neighbors to determine if something can be done to mitigate the noise that has caused neighbor complaints. This study is a part of that effort. We were able to identify rooftop exhaust fans, a garage door, and the shooting range roof as the dominant paths of sound that impact the neighbors. We outline ways to mitigate the noise near the end of the report. Exhibit HH - Page 1 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 2 Acoustical Terminology The following acoustical terms are used in this report. A-weighted Sound Level (measured in dBA): sound pressure levels determined by using the common A-weighting scale. The A-weighting scale is designed to approximate the response of the human ear by altering (weighting) the lower and higher frequencies. It is commonly used for the measurement of environmental noise and industrial noise. The effect of low frequency noise is reduced when using the A-weighting scale. Background Sound: all sounds from sources other than the sound source being measured. Equivalent Sound Level (LEQ): The sound level which, in a stated period of time, would contain the same acoustical energy as the time varying sound during the same period. The LEQ is essentially the average sound level. The actual instantaneous noise levels fluctuate above and below the measured LEQ during the measurement period. The A-weighted LEQ is a common descriptor for measuring environmental noise. Maximum Sound Level (LMAX): the maximum sound level that occurred during the measurement period. Time-weighting (or Time Response): The Time Weighting setting on a sound level meter (Fast or Slow) damps the reaction of the measured level to a sudden change in the sound level. The time-weighting characteristics are defined by IEC Standard 61672-1. Fast response reacts quicker than Slow response. The Fast time constant is 125 milliseconds. The Slow time constant is 1.0 second. The time constant can be thought of as averaging time. Sound Level Measurement Procedures Wave Engineering visited the Silver Bullet Shooting Range on February 21, 2024, to measure the background sound levels and gunshot sound levels in multiple locations on and around the Silver Bullet site. This included properties to the north and on the Silver Bullet building roof. Cole Haselip with the City of Wheat Ridge and Phil of Silver Bullet were present during the testing. Four sound meters were used to measure the sound level at multiple locations at the same time. One meter was indoors and placed just behind the shooting range firing line. The other three were outdoors. Two outdoor meters ran continuously to measure the background sound levels when the gunshots were not present. One was moved around the site as needed. Exhibit HH - Page 2 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 3 The Silver Bullet operates between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., seven days a week. Our measurements took place during normal business hours. Silver Bullet employees were present during the testing. An employee shot multiple types of firearms. All four sound level meters recorded the following metrics in a continuous series of one-second intervals. A-weighted equivalent sound level (LEQ) Maximum A-weighted equivalent sound level Minimum A-weighted equivalent sound level L1, L10, L50, L90, L99 A-weighted LN percentile levels (Impulse time-weighting) Due to the volume of data collected, all of the sound data collected is not provided in this report; however, the data can be provided if needed. This report mainly focuses on the gunshot sound data. The Maximum sound level with Fast response (LAFMAX) is used to quantify gunshot sound levels. Test Locations The three stationary measurement locations are shown in Figure 1 and described below. The fourth sound level meter that was used was moved around the Silver Bullet site during testing. Location M1 was in the backyard of the home at 5830 West 39TH Avenue. It was approximately 225′northeast of the northeastern corner of the Silver Bullet building. The meter was placed in the middle of the backyard rather than at the western fence as the line of sight with Silver Bullet was obscured at the western fence. Location M2 was located indoors just behind the firing line of Lane 1of the shooting range. The measured sound levels here show “spikes” whenever shooting is occurring on any of the shooting lanes. This allowed us to synchronize the sound of gunshots at all measurement locations. Location M3 was approximately 135′ due north of the Silver Bullet building. It was on the south side of the property line of the home at 3860 North Harlan Street. Exhibit HH - Page 3 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 4 Figure 1: Measurement Locations N M1 M3 M2 (INDOORS) X X X SILVER BULLET Exhibit HH - Page 4 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 5 Test Equipment The following test equipment was used. Location M1 Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0002878, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 023893 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 314955 Location M2 Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0001119, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 026106 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 138652 Location M3 Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0004081, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 036934 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 153301 Handheld Meter Larson Davis Model 831 sound level meter S/N 0003166, Type 1 per ANSI S1.4 PCB preamp PRM831, S/N 021453 PCB ½ʺ microphone Model 377B02, S/N 154555 All of the sound meters meet the specifications of ANSI S1.4 Type 1 and/or IEC 61672-1 Class 1 integrating sound level meters. The calibration of each system was checked in the field before and after the measurements with a Larson Davis CAL200 acoustic calibrator (S/N 2905). Laboratory calibration certificates for the equipment are available upon request. We also evaluated sound sources and paths on site with a Brüel & Kjær Type 9712-W-FEN BK Connect Acoustic Camera. The camera uses a 0.35 meter diameter irregular array of 30- microphones with beamforming analysis to determine the directionality of sound. It is able to superimpose the sound levels over a still photo or video image. Its main purpose is to rank the significance of various sound sources rather than to measure the absolute sound levels. We use it together with a standard sound level meter. We are able to view the imagery in real time and also to post-process the data later for further analysis. At Locations M1, M2, and M3, the microphone for each sound meter was mounted approximately 5′ above the ground or floor on a tripod. Windscreens were used on all microphones. Photos 1 and 2 show measurement Locations M1 and M3. Exhibit HH - Page 5 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 6 Photo 1: Sound Level Meter at Location M1 Exhibit HH - Page 6 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 7 Photo 2: Sound Level Meter at Location M3. Exhibit HH - Page 7 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 8 Weather Conditions Weather and meteorological conditions can influence the transmission of sound outdoors and have a significant effect when sound travels distances greater than about 300 feet. The weather conditions not only influence the sound of gunshots, but also traffic noise. Wind speed and direction, and the presence of a temperature lapse or inversion, have the most influence on sound transmission between distant points. Wind and rain can also have a significant effect on measured sound levels due to the sound from rustling leaves, grass, rainfall, etc. The weather conditions (temperature, humidity, wind speed, and wind direction) were measured near the start and end of our measurements. At 10:30 a.m. on February 21, 2024, it was clear and sunny. The temperature was 67° F, with Relative Humidity of 13%. The wind was 0-3 mph from the south/southwest. At 12:49 p.m. on February 21, 2024, the temperature was 68° F, with a Relative Humidity of 13%. The wind had increased to 0-10 mph. The weather conditions did not have a significant impact on the measured sound levels. Sound Level Measurement Results Background Measurement Test Results We measured the background sound levels at both Locations M1 and M3 from around 11:05 to 11:25 a.m. on February 21, 2024. No gunshots from Silver Bullet occurred during this time. At Location M1, the background sound level was typically in the mid-40s dBA but fluctuated due to traffic and nearby business activity. At Location M3, the background sound level was typically in the upper 40s to low 50s dBA but fluctuated due to traffic and nearby business activity. Shooting Test Results Below are four charts that plot LAFMAX gunshot sound data at Locations M1, M2, and M3. The shooting was performed by the Silver Bullet employee. Handheld measurements were taken near the west wall of the range, outside the range garage door, on the roof, and other locations around the building. The data are not shown here but were used in our evaluation of potential mitigation measures. Exhibit HH - Page 8 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 9 Each chart shows the sound level for one type of firearm. Chart 1 plots the sound levels due to a 9mm pistol. Chart 2 plots the sound levels of a .223/.556 rifle. Chart 3 plots the sound levels of a .300 rifle. Chart 4 plots the sound levels of a .308 rifle. A 12 gauge shotgun was also measured together with likely various types of firearms that customers shot during our visit. The charts show LAFMAX gunshot sound data which more accurately represent the gunshot sound levels due to the short duration of a gunshot. Each chart shows three colored curves. The Blue curves show the LAFMAX dBA level at Location M1. The Green curves show the LAFMAX dBA level at Location M2.The Location M2 curves are provided to clearly indicate when guns are fired. The Red curves show the LAFMAX dBA level at Location M3. The ″spikes″of gunshots are visible in the charts. Individual gunshots are also highlighted in yellow. Sometimes a spike may appear to last for more than one second. This is typically due to the gunshot occurring near the end of a one-second measurement, so the sound level affects the next one-second measurement as well. The sound levels are also likely affected by the sound of the bullets hitting the steel trap. Most gunshots are louder than the background sound levels. The gunshots were clearly audible at Locations M1 and M3 during our measurements. Tables 1 – 4 show the average LAFMAX sound level due to gunshots at Locations M1 and M3, as well as the average difference between the LAFMAX of the gunshot at indoor Location M2 and outdoor Locations M1 and M3. Each table looks at the sound levels associated with one specific firearm, i.e. 9mm, .223/.556, etc. Exhibit HH - Page 9 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 1010 Chart 1: 9mm Sound Levels at M1, M2, and M3 Table 1: Average Gunshot Sound Levels and Sound Level Difference –9mm Firearm Location Average LAFMAX Due to Gunshot Average Difference in Gunshot Sound Level from Location M2 Location M1 48.8 dBA 76.4 dBA Location M3 57.3 dBA 67.5 dBA 3030 3535 4040 4545 5050 5555 6060 6565 7070 7575 8080 8585 9090 9595 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 1010 :4949 :3030 1010 :4949 :3232 1010 :4949 :3434 1010 :4949 :3636 1010 :4949 :3838 1010 :4949 :4040 1010 :4949 :4242 1010 :4949 :4444 1010 :4949 :4646 1010 :4949 :4848 1010 :4949 :5050 1010 :4949 :5252 1010 :4949 :5454 1010 :4949 :5656 1010 :4949 :5858 1010 :5050 :0000 1010 :5050 :0202 1010 :5050 :0404 1010 :5050 :0606 1010 :5050 :0808 1010 :5050 :1010 1010 :5050 :1212 1010 :5050 :1414 1010 :5050 :1616 1010 :5050 :1818 1010 :5050 :2020 1010 :5050 :2222 1010 :5050 :2424 1010 :5050 :2626 1010 :5050 :2828 1010 :5050 :3030 1010 :5050 :3232 1010 :5050 :3434 1010 :5050 :3636 1010 :5050 :3838 1010 :5050 :4040 So u n d P r e s s u r e L e v e l So u n d P r e s s u r e L e v e l (dB A ) 9mm Sound Levels LAFmax at M1 LAFmax at M2 LAFmax at M3 WendesdayFebruary 2121 Exhibit HH - Page 10 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 1111 Chart 2: .223/.556 Sound Levels at M1, M2, and M3 The last two gunshots, around 10:54:18 and 10:54:22, for Location M1 are not being counted in the average as they were affected by background noise. Table 2: Average Gunshot Sound Levels and Sound Level Difference –.223/.556 Firearm Location Average LAFMAX Due to Gunshot Average Difference in Gunshot Sound Level from Location M2 Location M1 57.1 dBA 72.6 dBA Location M3 65.8 dBA 63.2 dBA 3030 3535 4040 4545 5050 5555 6060 6565 7070 7575 8080 8585 9090 9595 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 1010 :5353 :3030 1010 :5353 :3232 1010 :5353 :3434 1010 :5353 :3636 1010 :5353 :3838 1010 :5353 :4040 1010 :5353 :4242 1010 :5353 :4444 1010 :5353 :4646 1010 :5353 :4848 1010 :5353 :5050 1010 :5353 :5252 1010 :5353 :5454 1010 :5353 :5656 1010 :5353 :5858 1010 :5454 :0000 1010 :5454 :0202 1010 :5454 :0404 1010 :5454 :0606 1010 :5454 :0808 1010 :5454 :1010 1010 :5454 :1212 1010 :5454 :1414 1010 :5454 :1616 1010 :5454 :1818 1010 :5454 :2020 1010 :5454 :2222 1010 :5454 :2424 1010 :5454 :2626 1010 :5454 :2828 1010 :5454 :3030 So u n d P r e s s u r e L e v e l So u n d P r e s s u r e L e v e l (dB A ) .223/./.556 Sound Levels LAFmax atM1 LAFmax at M2 LAFmax at M3 Wendesday February 2121 Not Used in Average Exhibit HH - Page 11 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 1212 Chart 3: .300 Sound Levels at M1, M2, and M3 Table 3: Average Gunshot Sound Levels and Sound Level Difference –.300 Firearm Location Average LAFMAX Due to Gunshot Average Difference in Gunshot Sound Level from Location M2 Location M1 55.8 dBA 71.6 dBA Location M3 65.9 dBA 61.4 dBA 3030 3535 4040 4545 5050 5555 6060 6565 7070 7575 8080 8585 9090 9595 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 1010 :5858 :4545 1010 :5858 :4747 1010 :5858 :4949 1010 :5858 :5151 1010 :5858 :5353 1010 :5858 :5555 1010 :5858 :5757 1010 :5858 :5959 1010 :5959 :0101 1010 :5959 :0303 1010 :5959 :0505 1010 :5959 :0707 1010 :5959 :0909 1010 :5959 :1111 1010 :5959 :1313 1010 :5959 :1515 1010 :5959 :1717 1010 :5959 :1919 1010 :5959 :2121 1010 :5959 :2323 1010 :5959 :2525 1010 :5959 :2727 1010 :5959 :2929 1010 :5959 :3131 1010 :5959 :3333 1010 :5959 :3535 1010 :5959 :3737 1010 :5959 :3939 1010 :5959 :4141 1010 :5959 :4343 1010 :5959 :4545 So u n d P r e s s u r e L e v e l So u n d P r e s s u r e L e v e l (dB A ) .300 Sound Levels LAFmax at M1 LAFmax at M2 LAFmax at M3 WendesdayFebruary 2121 Exhibit HH - Page 12 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 13 Chart 4: .308 Sound Levels at M1, M2, and M3 Table 4: Average Gunshot Sound Levels and Sound Level Difference – .308 Firearm Location Average LAFMAX Due to Gunshot Average Difference in Gunshot Sound Level from Location M2 Location M1 58.2 dBA 72.3 dBA Location M3 68.4 dBA 61.8 dBA Unknown Noise Not Due to Gunshot Exhibit HH - Page 13 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 14 Table 5 shows the overall average LAFMAX sound level due to gunshots at Locations M1 and M3, as well as the average difference between the LAFMAX of the gunshots at indoor Location M2 and outdoor Locations M1 and M3. The tables use the charted data above and take into account the four different types of firearms discussed. Table 5: Average Gunshot Sound Levels and Sound Level Difference – All Firearms Location Average LAFMAX Due to Gunshot Average Difference in Gunshot Sound Level from Location M2 Location M1 56.1 dBA 73.7 dBA Location M3 65.8 dBA 64.2 dBA For reference, Figure 2 shows common sound levels in the everyday environment. Figure 2: Common Sound Levels (in dBA) Exhibit HH - Page 14 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 15 Acoustic Camera We used an acoustic camera to supplement the data acquired by the sound level meters. The acoustic camera was used to help identify noise leaks and paths of sound leaving the Silver Bullet building. We used the camera near the east Silver Bullet property line and pointed it southwest at the building. Additionally, we used the acoustic camera on the Silver Bullet roof. Figure 3 shows an example of images taken with the acoustic camera. The figures show colors overlaid on top of a photographic image similar to a thermal imaging camera. The colors represent the sound levels in the image. The clear and yellow areas in the center show where the loudest sounds levels are, while the green rings show progressively quieter levels. If an area is uncolored, it is likely quieter than the colored areas. Exhibit HH - Page 15 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 16 Figure 3: Acoustic Camera Image looking southeast Figure 3 shows that the gunshot sound is coming through the range exhaust fans on the roof. Silver Bullet Range Exhaust Fan Silver Bullet Roof Exhibit HH - Page 16 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 17 Silver Bullet Gunshot Sound Paths The gunshot measurements, our personal observations, and the information provided by the acoustic camera, were used to identify the gunshot sound paths from the Silver Bullet building that are affecting the neighbors. The most significant sound paths are the range roof, the range exhaust fans on the roof, the garage door near the northwest corner of the building, and the west wall of the range. Silver Bullet Roof Assembly and Roof Exhaust Fans We set up the acoustic camera northeast of the Silver Bullet building. When shooting occurred in the building, we saw that the sound was coming from the top of the building (as opposed to through the walls). The east, north, and south walls of the building are not directly exposed to the range itself. Handheld sound level measurements confirmed that much of the sound outdoors is coming through the roof. We also used the acoustic camera on the roof to determine if there were any noticeable sound paths in addition to the roof assembly. Figure 3 above shows an image from the acoustic camera. It shows that while sound was coming through the shooting range roof, the strongest sound source on the roof was the sound coming through the range exhaust fans. The rooftop fans open into the range below, so they are essentially a hole in the roof that sound passes through. The nearby properties are partially shielded from the roof. The roof does not have a parapet. While the sound through the two range exhaust fans is the strongest, there is a significant amount of sound passing through the roof itself. There is no ceiling in the range below. There is also an open pipe that penetrates the roof behind the trap. The pipe is open to the space behind the trap and provides another acoustic hole in the roof. The open pipe appears to be abandoned, but a mechanical engineer or contractor should verify that it is not necessary before removing or closing it. Silver Bullet Northwest Garage Door Gunshot sound is escaping through the sectional garage door on the northwest side of the building, behind the trap. The building shields the nearby properties to the northeast of the garage door; however, the properties to the north and west are not shielded by the building. Silver Bullet Western Wall Gunshot sound is escaping through the west wall of the range. Exhibit HH - Page 17 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 18 For this sound path, the Silver Bullet building acts as a sound barrier for the nearby properties to the northeast; however, the properties to the north and west are not shielded by the building. Recommendations The strongest sound paths are the range exhaust fans and the garage door. These should be addressed first. The roof is the next most significant sound path. The west wall is less significant. Our recommendations are conceptual in nature. More detailed design work may be needed to implement them. Our comments and recommendations are made with respect to meeting acoustical objectives only. They may have implications on compliance with fire ratings, mechanical, electrical, structural, or other building codes. These other disciplines are outside of our area of expertise and should be reviewed by qualified personnel as appropriate. If we need to make adjustments to meet fire ratings or other code requirements, we will work with you to do so. 1. Attenuate gunshot sound coming through the rooftop exhaust fans (and abandoned duct). There are the two exhaust fans that serve the shooting range. The exhaust fans appear to have a rectangular duct elbow and short length of duct that is open to the range and pulls air from above the range baffles. Sound from the shooting range enters the ductwork and exits from the fan on the roof. To attenuate this sound, we recommend replacing the existing short section of duct below the roof with elbow duct silencers. Refer to Photo 3 below for an image of the roof exhaust fans. Exhibit HH - Page 18 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 19 Photo 3: Looking South, two range exhaust fans on roof The purpose of the silencers is to attenuate the gunshot sound that is traveling through the ducts and fans. The silencers should be 3′ long Vibro-Acoustics Type RD-MV or equivalent, with a High Transmission Loss (HTL) casing. Vibro-Acoustic silencers are available from Long Building Technologies in Littleton, Colorado, (303) 975-2100. The silencer dimensions must be selected to fit the fan inlets at the underside of the roof and maintain low pressure drop. A mechanical contractor or engineer should verify that the fans can handle the added pressure drop of the silencers so that exhaust air is not reduced. The silencer provided is a straight length, but they can be ordered in an elbow configuration as well, and this may be easier to install and fit in the space above the baffles. The silencer must provide a minimum of 12 decibels of Dynamic Insertion Loss (DIL) in the 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, and 2,000 Hz octave bands, and a minimum of 10 decibels of Dynamic Insertion Loss (DIL) in the 250 Hz octave band. Pressure drop should be 0.15′′ w.g. or less if practical. Range Exhaust Fans Exhibit HH - Page 19 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 20 Instead of using an elbow silencer, a straight silencer could be attached to the standard duct elbow that is attached to the fans below the roof. Any duct between the silencers and the roof fan connections must be wrapped (lagged) with Sound Seal B10 Lag/QFA-3 or equivalent mass loaded vinyl and fiberglass composite material. A similar approach could be used for the open duct behind the trap (if it must remain), but it would likely be easier and cheaper to remove the duct and patch the roof (if the duct is abandoned). Refer to Photo 4 below. Photo 4: Open duct inside garage door (behind bullet trap) If these recommendations are implemented, we believe that gunshot sound levels at the properties to the north should be reduced by approximately 4 – 5 dBA. For reference, a 10 dBA changed is perceived by most people as “half as loud”, or “twice as loud. A 5 to 6 dBA change is clearly noticeable to most people. A 2 to 3 dBA changed is just barely noticeable to most people ABANDONED DUCT TO BE REMOVED (IF NOT NEEDED) Exhibit HH - Page 20 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 21 One benefit of attenuating the gunshot sound coming through the roof fans and duct is that it will help lower the gunshot sound level at all of the nearby properties. We have provided an image of how the silencer could possibly be installed in Appendix A, Image A1. 2. Attenuate sound coming through Silver Bullet garage door. Gunshot sound is clearly coming through the garage door on the northwest side of the Silver Bullet building. The easiest way to attenuate the sound coming through the garage door is to build a secondary enclosure over the garage door. Essentially, it places a second door over the existing door. The “doghouse” type enclosure should completely cover the garage door and should be sealed against the existing facility. The enclosure can be made of wood sheathing and siding, CMU, brick, or other material, can have a sloped roof, etc. We recommend that the walls and roof contain at least two layers of plywood or standard brick (not brick veneer) at the minimum. The new enclosure could utilize a second garage door, or a pair of swinging doors. In either case, the new door(s) should be weather stripped to seal well. Any gaps in the enclosure should be caulked using a non-hardening sealant. Another option could be to replace the garage door with a sound-rated door, but a sound- rated door of this size would be very expensive. If the garage door recommendations are followed and used in conjunction with the duct silencers discussed in Recommendation 1, we believe that the gunshot sound levels at the nearby properties should be reduced by approximately 5-6 dBA. This would be a noticeable reduction. This recommendation will have more of an impact on the northern and northwestern properties, as the northeastern property lines are shielded from the garage doors by the Silver Bullet building. We have provide an image of what the enclosure could possibly look like in Appendix A, Image A2. We have not investigated this in detail, but replacing the steel trap with a rubber bullet trap would significantly reduce the sound behind the trap and may eliminate the need to enclose the garage door. 3. Attenuate sound coming through range roof. In addition to the gunshot sound coming through the rooftop exhaust fans, a significant amount of gunshot sound is coming Exhibit HH - Page 21 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 22 through the roof itself. Unfortunately, reducing sound through the roof will be much more expensive and intrusive than the first two items above. There are two ways to reduce sound transmission through the roof. First, the roof could be modified by adding mass to it. This would mean completely reroofing the building. Second, a ceiling could be added inside the range (above the baffles). To modify the roof, we recommend building up the roof by placing two layers of plywood sheathing, DensDeck, or equivalent material, on it before the replacing the roof membrane. We believe this could reduce sound levels at the residences to the north by approximately 6-8 dBA. This would be a noticeable reduction. This assumes that Recommendations 1 and 2 are also done. This option may require the services of a structural engineer to verify that the structure can support the added weight. Adding a ceiling within the range may be more difficult but would be even more effective. The ceiling would have to be continuous over the entire shooting range. The ceiling could consist of one layer of ⅝″ thick Type X gypsum board supported on hangers or metal or wood framing. 3″ (minimum) fiberglass batt insulation should be placed in the new ceiling cavity. Ceiling penetrations should be sealed airtight as described above. We estimate that adding a ceiling in addition to following Recommendations 1 and 2 (treating the roof fans and garage door) could reduce gunshot sound levels at the neighbors’ homes by approximately 7-9 dBA. The reduction due to adding a ceiling and treating roof fans should benefit all the neighbors. However, treating the garage door would still have more of an impact on the northern and northwestern properties. Again, the roof or ceiling modifications will help lower the sound level at all of the nearby properties. 4. Attenuate the sound coming through the Silver Bullet western wall in the shooting range. Gunshots are clearly audible outdoors from the west range wall. The east, north, and south wall of the shooting range is less of a concern as there are corridors, storage, retail, offices, etc., that act as buffer spaces. Again, the best way to attenuate the sound coming through the wall assembly is to modify the existing wall assembly. At this time, we believe that gunshot sound coming through the west wall is well below the gunshot sound through roof, fans, and garage door. We do not recommend modifications to the wall at this time, but they could be considered later if further improvement is needed. This would most likely require furring out a wall with gypsum board or plywood on the range side of the wall. Exhibit HH - Page 22 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 23 Barriers and Silver Bullet Entrance We understand that there have been some questions about the effectiveness of a sound barrier. We do not believe that barriers are a good option in this situation. For a sound barrier to be effective, it should either be close to the sound source or close to the receiver. A sound barrier is less effective when located in the middle, between the source and receiver. It must also block the line-of-sight between the source and receiver. A logical place for a barrier is on the property line. A sound barrier could replace the property line fences. We evaluated a barrier at this location. Even a 12′ tall barrier would provide only a slight reduction of gunshot sound. We understand that there have been recent complaints from the neighbors south of the Silver Bullet range. We did not take any measurements to the south of the Silver Bullet range as our focus was on the residences to the north. As the southern residences do not have a line-of-sight with the range garage door, they are likely hearing the sound from the rooftop sources. Treating the rooftop sources, including adding a ceiling to the shooting range, should reduce the sound level at the southern residences. You asked about upgrading the southern wall and glazing of the Silver Bullet building. We do not believe that sound coming through the range, lobby, and southern wall and glazing is a significant source of noise affecting the southern residences. We do not recommend upgrades to the Silver Bullet southern wall or glazing at this time. Exhibit HH - Page 23 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Page 24 Conclusions Gunshots are clearly audible above the background noise at the nearby homes to the north. We have identified the rooftop exhaust fans, the garage door, and the roof as the primary paths for sound escaping the range building. We outlined methods to reduce sound transmission through each of these paths. The cost of Recommendation 3 will likely be the most expensive by far. A contractor should be able to provide you with cost estimates for each recommendation. The recommendations that we identified can significantly reduce sound levels at the nearby homes. Gunshot sound levels are currently 5 to 25 dBA above the background sound, depending on the background levels and the firearm. As a rule of thumb, the sound of a gunshot must be 10 dBA or more below the background sound to be nearly inaudible. It is likely not practical to make the gunshot sound inaudible outside. Even if all of these recommendations are implemented, gunshots will still be audible. However, they should be noticeably quieter. Please let us know if you have any questions or would like to discuss this report. Sincerely, Nathaniel Flanagin Jeff Kwolkoski, P.E., INCE Bd. Cert Staff Consultant Senior Acoustical Engineer Jeff Kwolkoski Digitally signed by Jeff Kwolkoski DN: C=US, E=jeffk@waveengineering.us, O=Wave Engineering, CN=Jeff KwolkoskiDate: 2024.05.01 13:01:16-06'00' Nathaniel Flanagin Digitally signed by Nathaniel FlanaginDN: C=US, E=nathanielf@waveengineering.us, O=Wave Engineering, CN=Nathaniel FlanaginDate: 2024.05.01 17:40:15-06'00' Exhibit HH - Page 24 of 27 APPENDIX A Exhibit HH - Page 25 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Image A1: Possible Silencer Installation Method New Silencer Existing Rooftop Equipment Exhibit HH - Page 26 of 27 Cole Haselip May 1, 2024 Image A2: Possible Enclosure Installation New Enclosure Existing Building Exhibit HH - Page 27 of 27 1 Lauren Mikulak From:Jana Easley Sent:Friday, March 27, 2026 12:31 PM To:stuart@engdynamics.com; Lauren Mikulak Subject:RE: Wheat Ridge - Carwash Noise Readings OK, I’ll send out an invite for 11 am next Friday. Thank you. Jana Easley, AICP Planning Manager Phone: 303-235-2844 jeasley@wheatridge.gov (Note my new email address) From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2026 11:14 AM To: Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov>; Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Carwash Noise Readings Jana, Next Friday is better preferably 110am time slot. Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 15:28 To: stuart@engdynamics.com; Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Carwash Noise Readings Hi Stuart, Wondering if you have any time next Thursday or Friday for a virtual call to go over the report? The best times for us would be 11 am, noon or 3 pm on Thursday. On Friday 10 am or between 1 and 3 pm. Let me know if any of those times work for you. Jana Jana Easley, AICP Planning Manager Phone: 303-235-2844 jeasley@wheatridge.gov (Note my new email address) Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit II - Page 1 of 3 2 From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2026 1:31 PM To: Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov>; Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Carwash Noise Readings Jana and Lauren, Attached is updated report. Please review. We should probably have a short telephone conversation to discuss. Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2026 08:36 To: stuart@engdynamics.com; Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Carwash Noise Readings Hi Stuart, This is really helpful. In a nutshell, their “sound wall” is not su icient to adequately block the noise, which we suspected. One request: you clearly explain that our code doesn’t fully identify the dBs from one type of property to another, and you use the Je co noise regulations to support the ﬁndings. I wonder if you could replace (or supplement) the county’s with the state’s noise requirements since our city attorney says we would defer to the state’s noise regulations. While Wheat Ridge is in Je co, we are a “home rule” municipality so using the county’s standards may leave room for debate. The relevant sections from the state noise regs are attached. Thanks very much, Jana Jana Easley, AICP Planning Manager Phone: 303-235-2844 jeasley@wheatridge.gov From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2026 1:17 PM To: Jana Easley <jeasley@wheatridge.gov>; Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Carwash Noise Readings Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit II - Page 2 of 3 3 Jana and Lauren, Please ﬁnd attached the Autowash noise report. Please review and call or email with questions. Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit II - Page 3 of 3 1 Lauren Mikulak From:Lauren Mikulak Sent:Wednesday, December 10, 2025 8:01 AM To:Marie Trujillo; Lucas Hunt; Eric Kellogg; Phil Schroeder Subject:RE: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Thank you! Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has oAicially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 4:56 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov>; Lucas Hunt <lhunt@wheatridge.gov>; Eric Kellogg <ekellogg@wheatridge.gov>; Phil Schroeder <pschroed@wheatridge.gov> Subject: Re: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Hi Lauren- I'm sorry. We were out at the car wash and completed the remaining spots. Sound reading on 12/09/2025 Point C: The sound reading ranged from 52.2- 73.9 (two bays) at 1:47 pm. Most of the noise was created by traffic on Harlan St. You could not hear the carwash cycle over traffic at this assessment point. Point B: The sound reading ranged from 49.9- 55.7 (one bay) at 2:14 pm. Most of the noise was created by traffic on Harlan St and I70 Interstate. Point A: The sound reading ranged from 46.2- 48.2 (two bays and one vacuum) at 3:27 pm. Most of the noise was created by traffic on Harlan St and I70 Interstate. Point H: The sound reading ranged from 46.0- 48.7 (one bay) at 2:47 pm. Most of the noise was created by traffic on Harlan St and 44th Ave. Please let us know if you have questions. Exhibit JJ - Page 1 of 10 2 Thank you Marie Trujillo 11-1CS Community Services Team Supervisor Wheat Ridge Police Department 7500 w. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Fax: 303.235.2949 Phone: 303-235-2976 mtrujillo@ci.wheatridge.co.us From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 12:10 PM To: Lucas Hunt <lhunt@wheatridge.gov>; Eric Kellogg <ekellogg@wheatridge.gov>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov>; Phil Schroeder <pschroed@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Yes, I’m happy to chat and explain what I’ve learned from Council and Patrick and others. I just swung by everyone’s offices but didn’t see you. I’m at my office today until 1 and then back in meetings. I’ll be in tomorrow and will swing by before 9 or midday. Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. Exhibit JJ - Page 2 of 10 3 From: Lucas Hunt <lhunt@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 9:24 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov>; Eric Kellogg <ekellogg@wheatridge.gov>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov>; Phil Schroeder <pschroed@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Hi Lauren, Can we meet to discuss the status of this case, or can you give me a call? I have talked with Marie about where we go from here, and I would like to get a little more clarity on what we are trying to accomplish from the PD’s perspective. I am concerned about the enforcement of city code using vague or third-party information that contradicts the reading we have taken. Thanks, Lucas Commander Lucas Hunt Patrol Operations Division Wheat Ridge Police Dept. 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: (303) 235-2941 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2025 2:40 PM To: Eric Kellogg <ekellogg@wheatridge.gov>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Lucas Hunt <lhunt@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Another round of readings at the same mapped locations as before would be helpful. Neighbors have been sending these kinds of readings (attached). Patrick directed me to hire a third party so we don’t have to arbitrate between city and citizen readings or get into the weeds of calibration and methodology. I think the “unreasonable noise” portion of the code will come into play soon, not just the decibel readings. I will be giving an update to Council on the carwash in a study session early next year, and having any data we can collect will be helpful. Exhibit JJ - Page 3 of 10 4 Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Eric Kellogg <ekellogg@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2025 2:06 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Lucas Hunt <lhunt@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Lauren, We can continue to take measurements. Do have frequency you would like? EK From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2025 2:00 PM To: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Lucas Hunt <lhunt@wheatridge.gov>; Eric Kellogg <ekellogg@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Service Request I have been working to engage a third party sound consultant to take measurements for us as well. The two firms I’m talking with are likely unable to take readings until January. Would it be possible to continue taking periodic readings in December? Council has elected to wait to discuss the carwash until we have readings from a third party professional in addition to readings from you and the neighbors. I’m not sure if you are continuing to get service requests. The neighbors send me readings they’re taking from their own device, and they will likely be testifying at the council meeting again tonight. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2025 4:08 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Lucas Hunt <lhunt@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Eric Kellogg <ekellogg@wheatridge.gov> Subject: Re: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Exhibit JJ - Page 4 of 10 5 Hello- Here is an update on the sound readings for Lakeside carwash. On 11/18/2025 I took readings from point F and EZ pawn.  Point F-ranged from 50.7 to 70 (full wash, two bays in operation) on the property line of Lakeside parking lot, north of the wall. While taking the reading traffic noise was added in the background (during dry blowing with traffic 50.7-62.5). 1. South of the wall, mid front yard of 4360 Gray St. The sound reading ranged from 54.5 to 58.9. Again, with some traffic noise (during dry blowing with traffic 53.3- 54.0). EZ pawn parking lot area readings 61.2 to 70.0 (full wash, two bays in operation) with traffic background (during blow dry blowing with traffic 66.2-70.0). On 11/19/2025 the following readings were taken at point G and D: Point G- ranged from 46.7 to 59.1 on the property line of 4360 Gray St (full wash) with traffic driving on Gray St and 44th Ave (51.5-60.1 during dry blowing includung traffic noise on Gary St, 44th Ave and my radio traffic). Point D- ranged from 54.7 to 65.0 on the property line of Conoco/7-11 (full wash) with traffic driving on 44th Ave (62.4-65.3 during dry blowing including traffic). I plan to follow up with the remainig sound points next week. Thank you Marie Trujillo 11-1CS Community Services Team Supervisor Wheat Ridge Police Department 7500 w. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Fax: 303.235.2949 Phone: 303-235-2976 mtrujillo@ci.wheatridge.co.us Exhibit JJ - Page 5 of 10 6 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 3:33 PM To: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Service Request There is one more reading location at the back end of EZ Pawn because of concerns that the sound wall didn’t go on the western property line. I updated the image in the folder and reattached it here. Let me know who helps with readings so I can give wows. I’m trying to get a meeting scheduled with Jerry to think through next steps. I’ll keep you apprised. Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 1:58 PM To: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Service Request I just got off the phone with Patrick. Let’s go ahead with the sound reading collection we talked about. I cleaned up the map in case it’s helpful (see attached). I saved the map in the city sharepoint: 5900 W 44th - Lakeside Autowash Let me know how the readings may be recorded or documented. I can convert any reports into a spreadsheet to keep track of over time. We can figure that out maybe next Wednesday in our monthly meeting once we have our first few data points. Thank you for partnering on this! Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. Exhibit JJ - Page 6 of 10 7 From: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 1:51 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: Fw: Online Form Submittal: Service Request SMH, look at what we've already received. Marie Trujillo 11-1CS Community Services Team Supervisor Wheat Ridge Police Department 7500 w. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Fax: 303.235.2949 Phone: 303-235-2976 mtrujillo@ci.wheatridge.co.us From: Jennifer Clay <jclay@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 10:56 AM To: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@wheatridge.gov> Subject: Fw: Online Form Submittal: Service Request J. Clay (she/they) What's this? Administrative Program Coordinator Wheat Ridge Police Department 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Phone: 303-235-2913 Exhibit JJ - Page 7 of 10 8 E-mail: jclay@ci.wheatridge.co.us www.ci.wheatridge.co.us CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. From: Sage Faist <sfaist@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 8:48 AM To: Office OfThe Chief <ChiefOff@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Fw: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Good morning, Please see service request below Thank you, Sage Archer Faist Administrative Assistant City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone: 303-235-7041 SFaist@WheatRidge.gov www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Exhibit JJ - Page 8 of 10 9 From: no-reply@ci.wheatridge.co.us <no-reply@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2025 8:15 PM To: Sage Faist <sfaist@wheatridge.gov> Subject: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Service Request To submit a WRPD complaint or commendation, please visit our Community Input Form: Community Input Form Requests for service will be responded to within 48 hours of receipt of the request during normal business hours, M-F, 8am-5pm. Service requests submitted outside of normal business hours will be responded to within 48 hours of the first business day. First Name: Sandra Last Name: Sands Requestor Address Line 1: Requestor Address Line 2: Field not completed. City: Wheatridge State: CO Zip Code: 80212 Phone: Alt Phone: Field not completed. Email: Location of Request Re: auto wash on 44th Subject Noise pollution in my neighborhood About Service Request: Car wash mechanics are so loud it upsets peace of my home! The noise decibels are way above city regulations! Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. Exhibit JJ - Page 9 of 10 10 Exhibit JJ - Page 10 of 10 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com 24 March 2026 Ms. Lauren Mikulak, AICP Page 1 of 9 City of Wheat Rridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Voice: 303-235-2845 RE: Sound Level Measurement Results Lakeside Autowash EDI Job # C-4524 Dear Ms. Mikulak: Engineering Dynamic’s has completed sound level measurements of noise from Lakeside Autowash operations for Lakeside Autowash located at 5900 W 44th Ave. Results of the sound level measurements are described below. 1.0 Background 1.1 Measurement Locations In agreement with City of Wheat Rridge personnel sound levels of Autowash noise were measured at Locations as shown in Figure 1.1s 1,1 and 1.2 and as follows, Locations A, D and G – along the property line between the Autowash and 4355 Gray St. (residential commercial property; veterinary clinic zoned R-C (Restricted Commercial)). Note: Location G was added by EDI to measure sound from vacuum operations. Location B – at the northwest corner of 4360 Gray St. (residential property zoned MU-N (mixed use- neighborhood). Location C – along the property line between the Autowash and W. 44th Ave. Location E – at the southeast corner of the apartment building property located at 4455 N. Harlans St. (property zoned R-C (Restricted Commercial)residential property). Location F – at the northwest corner of the commercial property due east of the Autowash, 5892 W. 44th Ave. Location H – on north side of W. 44th Ave. directly north of Location C. Location I – on north side of W. 44th Ave. directly north of Location F. 1.2 Sound Level Measurement Dates Autowash sound level were measured on Tuesday 10-Mar-26 from ~4pm to 7:30pm, and Wednesday 18-Mar-26 from ~10pm to 11pm. During the measurement periods, approximately 50 car wash events were monitored. During the measurement periods there was vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., and Autowash noise levels were documented only when vehicle traffic noise would not artificially increase / affect Autowash noise levels. 1.3 Instrumentation Sound level measurements were made with a Larson Davis Type 1 Sound Level Analyzer. The Larson Davis Model 831 Sound Level Meter was field calibrated at the beginning of testing at 94.0 dB. At the completion of Commented [LM1]: 4355 is a commercial property – it’s zone commercially and has a vet clinic. Formatted: Right: 0.24", Tab stops: 5.69", Left Commented [LM2]: This location is commercial Commented [LM3]: The city has been under the impression that the carwash is not operating outside of the hours of 7am to 10pm. Can you share what activity you observed during this time? Commented [LM4]: Can this section be expanded to include the methodology details that you provided in the original scope of work? That would be helpful detail. Exhibit KK - Page 1 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com all testing the calibration level was checked, with a result of 94.0 dB. Exhibit KK - Page 2 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 2 of 9 Instrument Model # Serial # Calibration Date Calibration Due Date Larson Davis Real Time Analyzer Model 831 0004054 19-Jan-26 19-Jan-27 Larson Davis Acoustic Calibrator CAL 200 12548 19-Jan-26 19-Jan-27 1.0 City of Wheatridge Noise Ordinance The City of Wheatridge noise limits are described in Article V, Section 16-103 and is shown at the end of this report. Section (§) 16-103c, Table A does not specifically define the condition of commercial property to residential property; it only defines noise from industrial premises onto residential, commercial and industrial premises. Therefore, the applicable noise limits are those as defined in the State of Colorado Noise Law, C.R.S. §26-12-103. 1.4 State of Colorado Noise Law C.R.S. §25-12-103 The relevant portions of the State of Colorado Noise Law Section §25-12-103 are attached at the end of this report. CRS §25-12-103 includes the following noise limits: Since the subject property is adjacent to both residentially and commercially zoned properties, the decibel readings for each are prescribed by the above table. As defined, commercial to residential limits are the first row. Commercial to commercial limits are the second row. There are no industrially zoned properties adjacent to the site. has two interpretations, One – using the strict interpretation of Paragraph 1 and the noise limit table, Autowash noise levels can be 60 dBA 25-feet onto the adjacent properties from 7am to 7pm and 55 dBA 25-feet onto the adjacent properties from 7pm to 7am. In this case noise levels radiating FROM Commercial property INTO Residential property. Two – in practice many municipalities use the noise limits in the table as limits which can impinge ONTO the property Zone. In this case 55 dBA at the adjacent property line from 7am to 7pm and 50 dBA at the adjacent property line from 7pm to 7am. Additionally, none of the Zones in the table apply to noise impinging ONTO roadways. Therefore, there are no applicable exceedance levels at Locations C and F. The 1.5 Noise Wall along Southern Autowash Property Line Figure 1.5 shows a picture of the “Noise Wall;” which has been installed along the property line between the Autowash and the residential property at 4355 Gray St. There is an elevation difference between the Autowash driveway grade and the yard elevation of the Formatted: Body Text, Justified, Indent: Left: 0.58", Right: 0.08", No bullets or numbering, Tab stops: Notat 0.58" + 0.58" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.58", Space Before: 0 pt Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.58", First line: 0", Right: 0" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.58" Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.58", First line: 0", Right: 0" Commented [JE5]: Rather than the interpretation, which could be legally debated, please replace this with the state’s noise table and more clearly explain commercial to commercial vs. commercial to residential standards. Commented [JE6]: Is this still accurate? Commented [LM7]: Incomplete sentence? It would be helpful to discuss this section 1.4 together so I can better understand how the state law differs from our municipal code. Exhibit KK - Page 3 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com residence, of ~2-feet. The noise wall was installed at the residence yard grade and has a height of 6-feet above this grade and a height of ~8-feet above the Autowash driveway grade. 2.0 Sound Measurement Results Sound levels were measured for the following portions of a typical Autowash wash cycle, a. Initial vehicle entry into wash bay with pre-wash under carriage and vehicle spry. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building are open and Doors on the north side of the building are closed. b. Spray and Wash. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building and Doors on the north side of the building are closed. c. Drying Operations. During this operation the Doors on the south side of the building and Doors on the north side of the building are open. Table 2.1 summarizes Autowash sound levels at each measurement location and for each wash cycle. Commented [LM8]: Add section d. for vacuums? Can you share how many bays were operating at a given time. If this was measurements of “typical” and not “worst case” I assume it was 1-3 but not necessarily all 3 all at the same time for all measurements. Exhibit KK - Page 4 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 3 of 9 Table 2.1: Measurement Location Autowash Wash Cycle Portion, dBA Initial Spray Rinse and Wash Drying A 63 to 72 51 to 62 52 to 57 B 56 to 61 <50 to 61 <50 to 56 C <55 53 to 63 70 D1 68 to 70 57 to 63 50 to 54 D2 60 to 65 <50 to 58 <50 E <50 <50 <50 F <55 50 to 55 50 to 55 G 68 to 70 57 to 63 50 to 54 H1 <50 47 to 57 64 I1 <50 <50 <50 Notes: D1 = on Autowash side of noise wall. D2 = on Autowash side of noise wall. H1 = extrapolated from Location C noise levels. I1 = extrapolated from Location C noise levels. Inspection of Table 2.1 shows the following noise impacts from Autowash operations. Location A – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime residential noise limits. Location B – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime residential noise limits. Location C – sound levels from Autowash drying operations are clearly audible, however, noise from Autowash operations is below sound levels generated by vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., which are in the range of 70 to 85 dBA. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location D (Autowash side of noise fence) – for this location the loudest operation was the initial spray and rinse, when the south doors are open and somewhat depends on the size of vehicle being washed. With trucks louder than cars. Initial spray and rinse sound levels are clearly audible and exceed both daytime and nighttime residential noise limits. Location D (Residence side of noise fence) – Autowash noise levels are in the range of 5 to 8 dBA lower on the residence side of the noise wall, then on the Autowash side of the wall. While being lower Autowash initial spray operations still exceed the Daytime and Nighttime residential noise limits. Location D – vacuum operations (Autowash side of noise wall) are in the range of 55 to 62 dBA depending on the number of cars being vacuumed at one time. Location E – No audible sound impact from all Autowash operations. All car wash operations were less than 50 dBA. Formatted Table Commented [JE9]: Please add a column for max allowable dB. All but B are commercially zoned. Commented [JE10R9]: Also suggest adding end column to state whether in compliance with state dB levels. Commented [LM11]: Is this meant to be neighbor side? Commented [LM12]: Should read “neighbor” as this is not currently zoned for or used as a residence. Exhibit KK - Page 5 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 4 of 9 Location F – sound levels from Autowash drying operations are clearly audible, however, noise from Autowash operations is below sound levels generated by vehicle traffic on W. 44th Ave., which are in the range of 70 to 85 dBA. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location G – vacuum operations are in the range of 58 to 65 dBA depending on the number of cars being vacuumed at one time. Location H – sound levels from Autowash drying operations will be clearly audible and extrapolated noise levels are below Commercial property noise limits. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. Location I – sound levels from Autowash drying operations will be clearly audible and extrapolated noise levels are below Commercial property noise limits. No noise impact from Autowash operations at this location. 3.0 Summary Noise impact from Autowash operations is limited to the residential buildings / properties directly south of the Autowash, specifically 4355 Gray St. and 4360 Gray St. For residences further south along Gray St. Autowash wash operations will still be audible, they are less than or nearly less than the Daytime and Nighttime residential noise limits. 4.0 Observation Visual inspection of the noise wall and as seen in Figure 1.5 shows, a. The noise wall height is insufficient to provide adequate Autowash operation sound attenuation. The noise wall should have been constructed at least 4-feet higher, so that from the Autowash vehicle entry doors the roof gutter of the residence at 4355 Gray St. is not visible from the Autowash. b. The noise wall construction is steel tubing with ¾-inch plywood / OSB and faux (plastic) bricks on the Autowash side. This construction is insufficient and cannot provide adequate sound attenuation of Autowash noise. If you have any questions, please contact me at our Englewood office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING DYNAMICS, INC. Stuart D. McGregor, P.E. President Commented [JE13]: Please update this section accordingly using B as the only residentially zoned property and the remainder commercially zoned. Commented [LM14]: Can this be augmented to state that becuaes the “typical operations” are exceeding noise limits at certain locations, there was no need for a coordinated test of the “worst case” operations (with all bays and all vacuums simultaneously) as that would also exceed noise limits. This was the original intent, but I can see from the typical that it may not be necessary. Can other recommendations be incorporated? For example doors closed for all portions of the wash, noise wall modifications (different height, material, wrap the corner at Gray?) etc? Commented [JE15R14]: Also see city’s recommendations re: we would support a taller wall and communication with contractor re: density of wall. Commented [LM16]: Consider removing. Do we mean “directly south and southeast”? Exhibit KK - Page 6 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 5 of 9 E H I C F G D A B Figure 1.1: Autowash Sound Level Measurement Locations Commented [JE17]: We can replace this (and the second map, so there is just one) with a better map that has zoning and measurement locations. City can provide. Exhibit KK - Page 7 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 6 of 9 H I G Figure 1.2: Autowash Sound Level Measurement Locations Exhibit KK - Page 8 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 7 of 9 Figure 1.5:__ Autowash Noise Wall from North side Figure 1.__ Autowash Noise Wall from Southwest side showing construction Commented [JE18]: Please add in the photo of the back side to show the construction of the wall Formatted: Left Exhibit KK - Page 9 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 8 of 9 Commented [JE19]: The measurements from the car wash property line to the testing locations should be included on the maps since this provision clearly states the 25-ft distance Exhibit KK - Page 10 of 11 3925 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, Colorado 80110 ● Voice: 303-761-4367 ● www.engdynamics.com City of Wheatridge – Lakeside Autowash Noise Measurement Results 24 March 2026 Page 9 of 9 Exhibit KK - Page 11 of 11 1 Lauren Mikulak From:Alayna Olivas-Loera Sent:Monday, March 10, 2025 9:25 AM To:Jana Easley Cc:Lauren Mikulak Subject:Re: New Lakeside Car Wash Attachments:SUP-23-01 Approval Form - Signed.pdf Hello! Here is the approval form from the SUP. There isn't anything specific in there about noise - I think because the use itself wasn't changing, we didn't call it out specifically. Wonder if the fix could be as simple as the doors closing once someone enters the bay. Alayna Olivas-Loera Planner II Community Development Department o. 303-235-2852 NOTICE: Beginning on March 14, I will no longer be with the City of Wheat Ridge. For applicants working with me on active land use cases, please continue to work with me until I send an update on who your new case manager will be. For any other inquiries and matters not related to an active land use application, please reach out to the planner of the day at zoning@ci.wheatridge.co.us or call 303-234-5931. NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 9:16 AM To: Alayna Olivas-Loera <ALoera@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: New Lakeside Car Wash Hi – can you dig into this project and let me know what we have about noise please? Thanks. From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 1:48 PM To: Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: New Lakeside Car Wash Exhibit KK - Page 1 of 3 2 Do you know if this was a permitted use or SUP with any conditions? I’m not sure who the case manager was. I don’t know the specifics of the noise issue (outdoor vacuums) or the bays themselves. When I used it the other day, I was suprised that the bay doors didn’t close when the car was getting washed. Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Steve Art <sart@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 3:31 PM To: Alex Rose <arose@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: New Lakeside Car Wash Saw the post below on FB Steve Art Economic Development Manager Urban Renewal Executive Director Office - 303-235-2806 Mobile - 720-454-9040 City of Wheat Ridge Physical Address: 7490 W. 45th Avenue, Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Mailing Address: 7500 W. 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 New easy way to renew or apply for business licenses and pay sales tax online! We’re excited to announce the launch of GovOS Revenue, the City of Wheat Ridge’s new online platform for business licensing and tax management! With GovOS, you can apply for or renew business licenses and pay your sales tax online. The previous systems will be phased out beginning in May, so make sure to register for GovOS. You can find the link on our website or scan the QR code on the flyer. Wheat Ridge, a vibrant community of 33,000 just west of Denver, combines unique neighborhoods with thriving retail and commercial spaces. Named an All-American City in 2022 and ranked the fourth best place to live in Colorado, Wheat Ridge continues to earn national recognition, including a 2024 induction into the National League of Cities Hall of Fame. From: Steve Art Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 3:29 PM Exhibit KK - Page 2 of 3 3 To: Steve Art <sart@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit KK - Page 3 of 3 1 Lauren Mikulak From:Gretchen & Mike Josten < > Sent:Monday, December 8, 2025 1:37 PM To:Lauren Mikulak Cc:Janice L. Facinelli; Michael Josten; Scott Ohm; Rachel Hultin; Patrick Goff; Subject:Re: Carwash Update Attachments:Autowash Qualitative and Quantitative Non-Compliance Continues.pdf Thank you Lauren for this update. We understand things take time. As we are being asked to continue into yet another month of this corporation's non-compliance and disturbance of our peace, we are asking to be met in the middle and for Autowash to be cited and ticketed for the qualitative measures that have been violated since October 31st for the last 39 days and 585 operational hours. We will be sharing the attached documentation with the city council at tonight's meeting. We ask for some tangible steps to be taken to cite Autowash for the qualitative non-compliance of city code section 16-103-1. It does not require decibel readings to enforce this section of the code. Violation of city code 16-103-1 Unreasonable noise, disturbing the peace. Unlawful noise We have been at this since March and according to the code wording we have certainly suffered: "Unreasonable noise: any excessive or unusually loud sound which disturbs the peace and quiet of any neighborhood or causes damage to any property or business." "It is unlawful for any person to make, continue or cause to be made any unreasonable noise which, under all of the circumstances presented, would annoy, injure or endanger the comfort, repose or peace of a person of ordinary sensitivities." The 2020 city council implemented wording into the code to define both qualitative and quantitative measures. We are willing to wait on more quantitative ones until January, but we've certainly been the one's taking the brunt of this non-compliance and are strongly asking the city to step forward with citing them. Even better would be to disallow the use of the dryers until a valid study is completed as they are continuing to violate the decibel measures of the code as well. The qualitative sections were placed into this code to also hold weight and we ask them to be enforced and for Autowash to be held accountable. Thank you for your work regarding this matter and for reviewing the document which reflects analysis of the deceptive sound study. Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit MM - Page 1 of 19 2 Gretchen Josten On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:38 AM Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> wrote: Hi all, I wanted to provide a brief update. Staff and neighbors have both been in conversations with Councilmembers Ohm and Hultin, and based on those discussions, as well as the need for third-party sound data, the study session previously proposed for December 15 will be postponed to early next year. A carwash update will not appear on next week’s agenda. I have reached out to five sound consultants and am currently working through scope and fee with two firms. Both have indicated that they are likely unable to conduct field measurements until early 2026. I will keep you updated as soon as a contract is in place and we have confirmed timing. In the meantime, the Police Department continues to take periodic readings with the city’s meter as their schedules allow, and securing an independent expert remains my priority. I will be in touch as I learn more. Thank you, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Gretchen & Mike Josten <> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2025 8:53 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Exhibit MM - Page 2 of 19 3 Cc: Janice L. Facinelli ; ; Scott Ohm <sohm@wheatridge.gov>; Rachel Hultin <rhultin@wheatridge.gov>; Patrick Goff <pgoff@wheatridge.gov>; Michael Josten > Subject: Re: Carwash Update Thank you for your response Lauren and for moving forward with a study session with the City Council. We thank you for your continued support. We are not surprised that Autowash does not want to enter into mediation with us at this time, as they don't seem to have anything to lose since they are allowed to continue to operate currently while still being out of compliance on Wheat Ridge municipal code 16-103. I understand that the community services officers are certainly busy and we are not intending to over burden them. I am keeping track of readings in this document and will continue to do so until we can find resolution. I do believe that they should be issued tickets for their non compliance each day until they come into it. Otherwise of course they will continue to run business as usual. There should be repercussions for this deception and lack of respect both for the city and the community. We believe that Autowash has been deceptive in their actions from the onset. We do not find their sound study and follow up to be accurate at all as it was conducted deceptively without movement of the dryers as they function. The study has deceptive deductions in ambient noise and they didn't measure along their own property lines at all, rather they measured from two houses in on Gray Street and a random commercial property on Harlan. However, even measurements from the house two houses in from their operation still found them to be non-compliant for residential receptors. I'm unsure how they were allowed to re-open and continue to remain open after nearly a month of operating out of compliance. According to these eight readings in this document with video and photo evidence, they are operating 17 decibels over the 65db commercial Wheat Ridge code from certain locations on their property line with only one bay running. I will continue to document these readings per WR code 16-103 along the Autowash property lines as well as from my property line and Jan's property line. Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit MM - Page 3 of 19 4 At this point it seems that they should be restricted from using any bay dryers as even the bay furthest east hits 17 db over 65 from the north property line. We are asking the city council to restrict the use of the dryers fully. I will continue to measure and document these to get more research for their study session. We are hopeful that they can begin to be issued ticketing for their non-compliance. There needs to be a fire lit or else they will continue to operate as normal, out of compliance with no regard for the city of Wheat Ridge and their laws or the citizens that are suffering from this failure to comply. And yet another deception of Autowash is their removal of the Do Not Enter signs at the Gray street exit. We are asking that those be replaced by ownership as Dennis was the one that I witnessed removing them from the exit. I have attached the screenshot of their approved building plans where they were to have those in place. Please find the attached documentation of sound measurements. Thank you again for your help and have a wonderful week and Thanksgiving. Gretchen Josten Exhibit MM - Page 4 of 19 5 On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 1:09 PM Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> wrote: Hi all, Thank you for your comments, questions, and your willingness to consider mediation. Autowash has not agreed to mediation at this time. We are asking them to reconsider, as mediation can be an effective forum. We will continue to keep that option available if you and they agree. I can share the following answers and updates:  Section 16-103(c) of the municipal code requires noise to be measured “at any point along the property line or within the property line of the receiving premises to determine compliance.” Under Table A, the limits for a commercial receptor are 65 dB from 7 a.m.–10 p.m. and 60 dB from 10 p.m.–7 a.m. For a residential receptor, the limits are 55 dB and 50 dB, respectively.  The Police Department has one calibrated sound meter, and several code and patrol officers will be taking periodic measurements as their schedules allow. Because these readings occur alongside other duties and calls for service, we aren’t able to coordinate or schedule specific times for those measurements. I have requested measurements at several locations, including at Gretchen’s property line closest to the carwash. In addition, we are actively seeking a professional sound consultant to take readings so we can obtain data in a more efficient manner.  The existing Special Use Permit was issued to the operator, which means it is not transferable. Any future operator would need to apply for and receive a new SUP before opening.  We have tentatively scheduled a study session with City Council for Monday, December 15 to provide a status update. The meeting materials will be available on Wheat Ridge Speaks the Thursday or Friday prior, and public comment can be submitted through Wheat Ridge Speaks or provided at the meeting. For study sessions, please note that public comment is taken at the very beginning of the meeting, and is limited to three minutes per speaker. Thanks, Lauren Exhibit MM - Page 5 of 19 6 Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Gretchen & Mike Josten > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 12:47 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Janice L. Facinelli <; Scott Ohm <sohm@wheatridge.gov>; Rachel Hultin <rhultin@wheatridge.gov>; Patrick Goff <pgoff@wheatridge.gov>; Michael Josten <> Subject: Re: Carwash Update Hello Lauren. Thank you for your response regarding the car wash situation. We thank you for your time. We met as a group this weekend to discuss. We are not opposed to mediation with Dennis, but would like some things clarified first by the city. 1.) We would like to get very specific on the guidelines being used to measure the decibels coming from Autowash. Please advise what parameters are being used to measure by the city and what the Autowash test parameters were. Our front yard at should be the basis for whether or not they are in compliance with residential sound levels of 55db between 7am-10pm. If they do not meet those guidelines at the closest residential property line they will not meet it elsewhere. Per the city’s similar noise issue with Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit MM - Page 6 of 19 7 Rocky Mountain Bottling Company, the closest residential property was the source of sound testing per city council notes from April and August 2020. 2.) We would like to hear the city’s stance on how Wheat Ridge bill 17 Ordinance 1697 (2020) stands up to Colorado bill 25-12-103, specifically the revised statute 25-12-108 (2024) which states that: “Except as provided in sections 25-12-103 (12) and 25-12-110, this article shall not be construed to preempt or limit the authority of any municipality or county to adopt standards that are no less restrictive than the provisions of this article.” Are we correct to understand that to mean that Wheat Ridge can not outline noise abatement ordinances that are less restrictive than the CO guidelines of 55/50 in residential and 60/55 in commercial. And those hours being 7am-7pm and 7pm-7am. Are we interpreting that correctly? We want to be on the same page for what standards we are using to measure. From this interpretation that would mean that the noise coming from Autowash from 7am-7pm can not exceed 60db within Jan’s commercial yard at and can not exceed 55db from my residential yard at . And from 7pm-7am it is 55db in Jan’s yard and 50db in my yard. Addressing the timing of open hours is also something that would need to be addressed as was mentioned in the city council meeting to interpret allowable hours of unmanned businesses such as this. Technically according to Wheat Ridge bill 17-ordinance 1697 section 1-B regarding unlawful noise: residential and commercial properties: “any noise or sound which is audible 50 feet or more from a mobile noise or sound source is deemed as prima facie unreasonable.” 50 feet lands at the far end of Jan’s property and 50 feet lands in the middle of my front yard. Both of which is where the noise from Autowash is found to be unreasonable. 3.) We appreciate that Wheat Ridge will be moving forward with their own sound readings. We are requesting to be informed of the timing and to be present and witness readings. We are requesting this to happen and results shared with us prior to Friday, December 5th. We suggest coordination with Autowash to get all bays running at once. We appreciate the community officers taking readings this week. However this is an operational function that is causing distress to the community and it only seems right that instead of having to call them out there should be a test where Autowash is required to turn their equipment on to full capacity to test how they are allowed to Exhibit MM - Page 7 of 19 8 operate. That seems like something that would have been interesting prior to their allowance to open under a special use permit with this scenario. Here are the perimeters we believe will get the most accurate understanding of the noise. A. All 4 bays running at once. Then a reading with the three most west located bays, and then two and then one, to get an accurate understanding of true capacity at this location. B. At night is best to avoid car noise. C. The bay dryers to move as they normally do during the process. D. It looks like they have a few north doors staying down now, we would like clarify if this has been mandated in writing with Autowash as a requirement in their SUP for the only way they are allowed to operate. Readings with the north doors down. (If this is how they will be required to operate). E. Minimum of 3 locations for readings pulled:  Reading from property line at of Jan’s yard as the basis for south commercial adjacent property impact  My property line at as the basis for residential property impact.  Front of the building for north impact. 4.We are requesting information about the status of Autowash’s special use permit. What is the date of renewal/expiration of their current SUP? A. Based on Wheat Ridge code sec 26-114 section C, part 5, section e: on the issues that have taken place over the last year of operation we are requesting that we do not feel it to be correct action for the city to reissue a Special Use Permit unless it goes before the city council for renewal after these noise readings take place and decisions made for how they can operate within State and city codes. Per section 26-114 section C-d-3 we are requesting understanding of their SUP: what is the defined period, after which time the special use shall expire unless renewed, subject to all of the requirements. We have familiarized ourselves with several of the recent cases that are similar to this situation, most recently Hobbs vs the City of Salida regarding special use permits as well as the Wheat Ridge code 1697 from 2020 and the Rocky Mtn Bottling noise situation and are hopeful that with clarification and being on the same page as a collective moving toward a solution, this situation can be remedied clearly as it seems black and white: they are either operating under the allowable decibel levels of 55db from the point of my front yard property line or they are not. I understand that when it comes to adjacent Exhibit MM - Page 8 of 19 9 properties, the residential homes are not mentioned in their SUP as adjacent, however sound does not seem to be a qualifier that is restricted to adjacent only, especially in this situation. Our home is significantly closer to this business operation than the closest home to Rocky Mtn Bottling, within 50ft between property lines. We are hopeful it can be taken just as seriously as that situation was. Thank you for your time to acquire answers to these questions for us so we can have a more well rounded discussion regarding this situation. Gretchen Josten On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 4:24 PM Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> wrote: Hi all, I understand the disappointment and frustration you have felt since the reopening of the carwash last week, and I want to acknowledge the time and effort that you have put into communicating your concerns through email, documentation, and testimony at City Council meetings. The decision to allow partial reopening was based on the data that was available to us at the time, and I want to assure you that the City is continuing to actively evaluate the situation. To ensure a thorough and independent assessment, we are pursuing additional sound measurements. This includes readings by City staff as well as a licensed sound professional and includes multiple locations to reflect the full range of neighborhood conditions (to the north, south, east, and west). In the meantime, the City believes that a structured conversation between Autowash and a neighborhood representative could be helpful. Mediation is a commonly used tool in situations like this because it provides a neutral setting where both sides can speak openly, clear up misunderstandings, and explore practical adjustments that might not surface in larger public forums. It does not replace the City’s role, but it often leads to clearer expectations and more workable solutions between affected parties. To support this, the City is proposing to coordinate and pay for a professional mediator. Autowash and a neighborhood representative would be asked to select the mediator and identify times that work for both parties. The City will provide a meeting space and coordinate logistics, and would agree to pay for the mediator, but would not participate in the selection process other than to suggest available mediators. This ensures the mediation is fully owned by the neighbors and Autowash. Exhibit MM - Page 9 of 19 10 I have notified Autowash of your comments from Monday night and have proposed mediation to them as well. Please confirm if you are willing to participate in mediation, and please let me know who could serve as the neighborhood representative so we can begin arrangements. Thank you for your continued cooperation as we work toward a solution that works for everyone. Thanks, Lauren Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Gretchen & Mike Josten > Sent: Friday, November 7, 2025 5:33 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Janice L. Facinelli < Scott Ohm <SOhm@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Rachel Hultin <RHultin@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: Carwash Update We look forward to seeing you Monday and every council meeting moving forward as we find this to be an unacceptable decision on the part of the city. Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit MM - Page 10 of 19 11 To go from the verge of shutting them down to accepting one fence on one side of their property line as acceptable is absurd. To accept a sound test paid for and conducted by the business causing the harm to the neighborhood is absurd. We are extremely disappointed with this and will now be moving forward with expressing this to the media and acquiring our own legal representation. If it takes standing on public property and protesting we will not stop until a more sound decision is implemented for the peace of our neighbors and this quiet neighborhood. Have a nice weekend, Gretchen Josten and the ‘small, but vocal neighbors’ On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 5:09 PM Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> wrote: Hi Gretchen and neighbors, Thank you for alerting me earlier this week about the restart of operations. We have been in touch with the car wash operators throughout the week. They completed their post-installation sound testing and suspended operations until the City reviewed the results. The new readings confirm that the sound wall is having the intended effect, and the business is authorized to reopen to the public. They will operate three of the four bays; adding the fourth bay would exceed applicable noise limits. The City and the car wash will continue to monitor operations and noise levels. The business has also indicated that they are exploring quieter replacement equipment, which would be necessary to operate the fourth bay while remaining in compliance. Thank you, Exhibit MM - Page 11 of 19 12 Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Monday, November 3, 2025 10:45 AM To: 'Gretchen & Mike Josten' <> Cc: Janice L. Facinelli < Scott Ohm <SOhm@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Rachel Hultin <RHultin@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: Carwash Update Thanks for sharing this update. I was not expecting them to reopen this weekend, so we’re investigating. I’ll be in touch when I have an update. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Gretchen & Mike Josten <> Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2025 6:27 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Cc: Janice L. Facinelli Scott Exhibit MM - Page 12 of 19 13 Ohm <SOhm@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Rachel Hultin <RHultin@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: Carwash Update Hi Lauren I hope you have a wonderful weekend. I wanted to reach out to see if you could please update the Gray Street neighbors on the status and next steps for the car wash. They opened back up today as the so called ‘fence’ along the back of the property is complete. All bays are up and running as normal. Can you please advise next steps. I’m unclear how they were able to bypass any testing or anything. The dryers sound the exact same as they did before from our property. I don’t understand how we’ve gotten to this stage where they elected to close for three months so they wouldn’t lose their permit, did a half truthful sound test without the bays of the dryers running back and forth as the normally do and then throw up a wall at the back of the property and regain full capacity to run as normal. I spoke with Dennis today as he was on site and he said the doors will close when it’s a certain degree in the winter time. And that they may upgrade their system in the spring 7+ months from now. The solution seems to me to be simply close both of the doors all the time during the wash. That is the only way this is bearable. It’s like that in winter, why not all the time. I’m very hopeful that the city can continue the pursuit of this situation. Thank you for your time. Gretchen Josten On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 1:43 PM Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> wrote: The initial sound study did not take measurements in the area of 45th and Ingalls. I understand there is some anxiety as the business contemplates a reopening. Their sound engineer and contractor are coordinating next steps and design of the sound mitigation. It’s my understanding any new improvement would be on the carwash side of the existing fence, but the contractor has not completed the design. The business is aware of the applicable day and night decibel limits they must meet. They also recognize that any mitigation measures need to be effective to achieve compliance. The city will review post- installation sound testing before reopening. Jan, your property is currently zoned commercial. Our team is happy to connect offline to discuss what a future change in zoning or use could look like. Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit MM - Page 13 of 19 14 I’ll share more information with the group once I know more about timing and next steps. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Janice L. Facinelli <> Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2025 8:45 AM To: Gretchen & Mike Josten > Cc: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Scott Ohm <SOhm@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Rachel Hultin <RHultin@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: Carwash Update Good morning everyone. I also have a question for Lauren. I am concerned about what plans are in the making to protect Mike’s property which is north of the carwash. As I understand it when they were doing the sound testing, they didn’t test it from the northside. And I myself stood across the street, on the north side of 44th in front of the car wash and measured how high the decibels were. I am wondering if the city or the sound engineers went over and measured it from Mike’s house. I’m concerned that with the sound fence, the noise will be reflected back north, making it worse for Mike. Will the new fences absorb the noise or reflect it? I also would like to know more details about the fence, if possible, as to height and if it will be on my property line or just north of it. Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit MM - Page 14 of 19 15 I am wondering where the first fence will be located. I assume on the east side to protect my neighbors across the street. Thirdly, I want to remind the city, that my retirement plans include converting my property to residential, making the decibel limit lower. Hopefully the sound engineers are taking this into consideration. Thank you Lauren for all your hard work on this matter. Warm regards, Jan Facinelli Sent from my iPhone On Oct 4, 2025, at 7:52 AM, Gretchen & Mike Josten <> wrote: Thank you for this follow up Lauren, we appreciate your thorough details. One last question when you get a chance. Will the post wall installation sound test and result sharing need to happen prior to their reopening? Thank you. Gretchen On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 3:53 PM Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> wrote: Thanks for your follow-up questions. Their decision to place a sound barrier along the south property line was based on the sound study model and the recommendations they received from their sound consultant. Because the city is not the expert in this area, the car wash will need to provide post-installation sound readings to confirm compliance with the applicable day and night decibel limits. The sound consultant will follow the same methodology from the summer with readings at the property line and in the neighborhood. Exhibit MM - Page 15 of 19 16 As I understand it, they do not currently intend to install a fence or wall along the east or north. Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Gretchen & Mike Josten <> Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2025 12:02 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: J Scott Ohm <SOhm@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Rachel Hultin <RHultin@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: Carwash Update Thank you for the update Lauren. I am grateful some mitigation is happening and I know this should hopefully help Jan and the function of her business that butts up to the car wash. That is wonderful! We are very grateful something is happening. Chris and I were present during the ‘sound test’ at 10pm at night back in July where we have footage that the car wash decided to not have their vacuums move along the normal path south to north that happens during a drying session and instead had the dryers remain stationary at the south end of the bay closest to the closed door during the test. I understand this was a private test so you don’t have regulation over it but I did just want to be on record of the way in which the test was run to come to the conclusion that a fence on one side of their property will be adequate. I have Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit MM - Page 16 of 19 17 witnessed the severely decreased noise from the dryers when the north side doors were originally closed during service back when it first opened in the winter season. It seems like a fence along the front of the building and east side would be a complete fix, not a bandage of one fence. Or simply shutting the doors all together at no cost. Austin, Chris, Greg and I are on the east side of the street where we are impacted by the reverberation from the open doors on the north side of the building. I want to hope that a fence will assist, but am curious if that fencing is also planned to run along the east side and north side of their property as well to mitigate that dryer noise from bouncing back into the neighborhood. I remain optimistic that this will be resolved fully. Can you please advise what the city’s investigation will be once this fence is in place? We are hopeful to continue the great progress that you all made to bring about change and are thankful. Have a wonderful week. Gretchen On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 11:26 AM Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> wrote: Good morning, The carwash has confirmed its intent to construct a second fence along the rear property line that will function as a sound wall. The business will remain closed until the fence is installed and follow-up sound testing has been completed. This work is expected to take approximately three to four weeks. When the carwash does reopen, operations will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Thanks, Exhibit MM - Page 17 of 19 18 Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 10:32 AM To: Subject: Carwash Update Gray Street Neighbors, You may be aware that the 90-day voluntary closure for the carwash was due to expire this weekend. I have been in touch with the carwash team periodically throughout the summer, and this morning we had a positive conversation. They’re working on next steps, and I expect to have more details from them next week. For now, I can confirm that the business will remain closed beyond this Sunday. Thank you for your continued patience as we work through this process. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director 7500 W. 29th Avenue Exhibit MM - Page 18 of 19 19 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone: 303-235-2845 Fax: 303-235-2845 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. Don't forget to follow our Social Media Accounts! CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Exhibit MM - Page 19 of 19 1 Lauren Mikulak From:Lauren Mikulak Sent:Wednesday, February 4, 2026 9:32 AM To:'stuart@engdynamics.com' Subject:RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Super, I’ll call you at 9:30 tomorrow morning. Thanks! Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2026 9:31 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Thursday works.  Thursday, February 5 – between 9:30 and 11 Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 11:01 To: stuart@engdynamics.com Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Stuart, I’m looking forward to Friday. I have a call with the carwash tomorrow morning to conﬁrm if they’ll be willing to operate the doors so we can test both open and closed. My Thursday calendar is ﬁlling up, but I also have time on Wednesday. Can we put a calendar hold for our pre-test check-in? Do any of these times work for you?  Wednesday, February 4 – anytime between 11 and 1  Thursday, February 5 – between 9:30 and 11 Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit NN - Page 1 of 10 2 Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 3:19 PM To: stuart@engdynamics.com Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings That works for me. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 8:58 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Lauren, Hope you had a good weekend. Friday looks good. Say 9am. Lets check in on Thursday to verify. Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2026 10:54 To: stuart@engdynamics.com Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Thanks for updating the quote. This looks good. Next week’s weather looks pretty good. Can you do next Friday? Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit NN - Page 2 of 10 3 Once we have a date, I will ask the carwash again to participate in helping with doors open versus closed. Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 3:22 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Lauren, Thank you for updated information. Attached is updated quote. My thought are we make measurements with BOTH doors open and closed. The challenge will be picking a day with little or no wind, and mild temperatures (above 50F). Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 08:53 To: stuart@engdynamics.com Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Stuart, In the attached map, the following locations were identiﬁed as important to neighbors and decision makers: A through E. They also talked about G and F being important to capture noise going to the northeast with a recognition that we probably don’t need both. A – at property corner and at edge of wall B – at property corner of nearest residential C – at northern property line, at middle of lot D – on other side of sound wall (permission has been obtained to take a reading from that private property) E – responds to comments from a neighbor to the northwest F or G – reading at building or at northeast (we’d appreciate your advice on which makes more sense) One of our goals is to have a sound study that decision makers and neighbors feels is trustworthy, hence the multiple locations. Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit NN - Page 3 of 10 4 Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 3:52 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Lauren, I got your voice message. I will be in the ﬁeld tomorrow and may have jury duty Wednesday. Would you please send over additional measurement locations and I will adjust quote. Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 15:22 To: stuart@engdynamics.com Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Hi Stuart, Following up on my voice mail and trying to avoid phone tag this week. Would you be free for a phone call or Teams video call at any of these times?  Tuesday, Jan 27 at 10:30, 12:00, or 12:30  Wednesday, Jan 28 at 1:00  Thursday, Jan 29 at 9:00 or 9:30 Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit NN - Page 4 of 10 5 From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2025 11:20 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Lauren, Please ﬁnd attached EDIs quote for sound level measurements for the Lakeside Autowash. I will be out of town (working) from 13 through 17/18 December. I will be checking emails in the evenings during that time period. Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2025 11:00 To: 'Lauren Mikulak' <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Lauren, I will get quote to you by noon today. Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2025 10:57 To: stuart@engdynamics.com Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Stuart, Last email from me this week. A few things.  Our oAicers took a few more readings yesterday that I’ve pasted below.  I am expecting a proposal/scope/fee from one other person by the end of next week. Our procurement process requires that I get more than one. I know you’ll be out of the oAice here soon too. Please let me know if you need any more information from me to provide a proposal and fee. I will be out of the oAice tomorrow and Friday with limited email access. Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit NN - Page 5 of 10 6 Sound reading on 12/09/2025 Point C: The sound reading ranged from 52.2- 73.9 (two bays) at 1:47 pm. Most of the noise was created by traffic on Harlan St. You could not hear the carwash cycle over traffic at this assessment point. Point B: The sound reading ranged from 49.9- 55.7 (one bay) at 2:14 pm. Most of the noise was created by traffic on Harlan St and I70 Interstate. Point A: The sound reading ranged from 46.2- 48.2 (two bays and one vacuum) at 3:27 pm. Most of the noise was created by traffic on Harlan St and I70 Interstate. Point H: The sound reading ranged from 46.0- 48.7 (one bay) at 2:47 pm. Most of the noise was created by traffic on Harlan St and 44th Ave. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has oAicially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 2:11 PM To: 'stuart@engdynamics.com' <stuart@engdynamics.com> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Yes, you are correct. Section 16-103 is where our noise regulations are located. The carwash is zoned Commercial-One (C-1). Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has oAicially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 1:55 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Exhibit NN - Page 6 of 10 7 Lauren, A couple questions, a. is the current Wheatridge noise ordinance Sec. 16-103. - Unreasonable noise; disturbing the peace. b. What is the zoning of the car wash property? Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 13:04 To: stuart@engdynamics.com Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings I should have mentioned, I do not know if the carwash doors were open or closed during the PD measurements. I have asked that follow-up. Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has oAicially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 1:03 PM To: 'stuart@engdynamics.com' <stuart@engdynamics.com> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Stuart, Thanks for touching base. Attached are the sound studies JeA at Wave completed for Autowash pre and post wall. I was not able to consult with JeA at all. Autowash put all communication between them and the city through their attorney. We requested the contractor to connect with Wave, but I’m not sure if that happened either—attached are two images of the wall. Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit NN - Page 7 of 10 8 Based on comments from neighbors and council, I asked our code enforcement oAicers to take periodic readings at any/all of the locations shown on the attached map. Our police department has gone out twice and plans to go again, and so far, I have received this summary from them: On 11/18/2025 I took readings from point F and EZ pawn.  Point F-ranged from 50.7 to 70 (full wash, two bays in operation) on the property line of Lakeside parking lot, north of the wall. While taking the reading traffic noise was added in the background (during dry blowing with traffic 50.7-62.5). 1. South of the wall, mid front yard of 4360 Gray St. The sound reading ranged from 54.5 to 58.9. Again, with some traffic noise (during dry blowing with traffic 53.3- 54.0). EZ pawn parking lot area readings 61.2 to 70.0 (full wash, two bays in operation) with traffic background (during blow dry blowing with traffic 66.2-70.0). On 11/19/2025 the following readings were taken at point G and D: Point G- ranged from 46.7 to 59.1 on the property line of 4360 Gray St (full wash) with traffic driving on Gray St and 44th Ave (51.5-60.1 during dry blowing includung traffic noise on Gary St, 44th Ave and my radio traffic). Point D- ranged from 54.7 to 65.0 on the property line of Conoco/7-11 (full wash) with traffic driving on 44th Ave (62.4-65.3 during dry blowing including traffic). As I mentioned we’re happy to help coordinate vehicles going through the carwash. I appreciate your time. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has oAicially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: stuart@engdynamics.com <stuart@engdynamics.com> Sent: Friday, December 5, 2025 9:52 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Lauren, Thank you for contacting EDI regarding the car wash noise issue. I will need to know the Name / Ownership of the car wash in question. I already do work for another car wash company and want to make sure I don’t have a conﬂict of interest. I will be leaving oAice soon for ﬁeld work. So, we may need to visit on Monday. Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the IT Division. Thank you. Exhibit NN - Page 8 of 10 9 Stuart McGregor, PE Engineering Dynamics, Inc. 3925 S. Kalamath St. Englewood, CO 80110 303-761-4367 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@wheatridge.gov> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2025 16:48 To: stuart@engdynamics.com Subject: Wheat Ridge - Noise Readings Hi Stuart, Your name was given to me by Terry Steinborn as a possible resource. I’m reaching out on behalf of the City of Wheat Ridge regarding a neighborhood noise concern associated with a recently opened carwash. The carwash is operating three of their four wash bays and has provided their own sound readings to demonstrate compliance with local noise limits; however, due to continued neighborhood concerns the city would like to conduct its own independent monitoring. We have identiﬁed approximately ten locations throughout the surrounding neighborhood (north, south, east, and west of the site) where we’d like sound measurements to be taken (though we’d be open to expert opinions on reading locations). The carwash operation includes multiple phases that generate diAerent sound proﬁles (vacuuming, wash cycle, and dryers). The neighborhood concerns have been focused on the drying cycle. We are looking for a consultant who can capture the existing conditions to help us evaluate compliance and neighborhood impact. Is this something you can help us with? I’m happy to share more background or chat about the project if that’s helpful. I’d appreciate your guidance on next steps to obtaining a scope and fee if this is within your area of expertise. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone: 303-235-2845 Fax: 303-235-2845 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has oAicially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. Don't forget to follow our Social Media Accounts! Exhibit NN - Page 9 of 10 10 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Exhibit NN - Page 10 of 10 1 Lauren Mikulak From:Phil Schroeder Sent:Tuesday, March 11, 2025 12:29 PM To:Lauren Mikulak; Alayna Olivas-Loera; Jana Easley Cc:Marie Trujillo; Phil Schroeder Subject:RE: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise Lauren, I agree with your logic and assessment to find a solution. I must believe that the mechanical process included doors enclosing the washing process, as it would make sense why they are included in the first place. Preliminary decibel readings were taken Sunday (3/9) and we are scheduling added times, locations to complete a thorough assessment. Philip Schroeder Community Services Team Supervisor Wheat Ridge Police Department 7500 W 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us oﬃce: 303-235-2998 cell: 303-882-5145 From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 10:46 AM To: Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Alayna Olivas-Loera <ALoera@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise I understand a neighbor called last night. I looked the plans and they include garage doors on both sides of all bays. I think if they’re not willing to close the doors for all bays for all washes, we’ll have to look at restricting their hours through the SUP process. Hopefully that provides some leverage for them to take seriously that the doors need to be closed. When I went through it the other day, the dryer goes over the car (instead of you having to drive out through a dryer). Let me know if you need anything from zoning between now and our next monthly meeting. Thanks, Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Exhibit OO - Page 1 of 7 2 Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has oAicially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 9:41 AM To: Alayna Olivas-Loera <ALoera@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise Alright, thanks. Philip Schroeder Community Services Team Supervisor Wheat Ridge Police Department 7500 W 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us oﬃce: 303-235-2998 cell: 303-882-5145 From: Alayna Olivas-Loera <ALoera@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 9:28 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise Hello! You can contact Dennis Dreeszen, he is the CEO of Autowash and who I worked with on the project. Thanks! Alayna Olivas-Loera Planner II Community Development Department Exhibit OO - Page 2 of 7 3 o. 303-235-2852 NOTICE: Beginning on March 14, I will no longer be with the City of Wheat Ridge. For applicants working with me on active land use cases, please continue to work with me until I send an update on who your new case manager will be. For any other inquiries and matters not related to an active land use application, please reach out to the planner of the day at zoning@ci.wheatridge.co.us or call 303-234-5931. NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 9:24 AM To: Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Jana Easley <JEasley@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Alayna Olivas-Loera <ALoera@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise Hi Phil, I’m looping in Jana and Alayna. This is Alayna’s last week with us, but she may be able to provide contact information. Lauren Mikulak, AICP (she/her/hers) What's This? Community Development Director Phone: 303-235-2845 NEW PERMIT PORTAL! The city has officially launched OpenGov—a new one-stop shop, for permitting, licensing, and inspections. In 2025 and beyond, all permit applications and contractor licenses will be submitted and processed in the new OpenGov permit portal. Visit the city website for more information on building permits and right-of-way permits. From: Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 7:10 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <lmikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise Exhibit OO - Page 3 of 7 4 Lauren, This new automated carwash business is quickly upsetting most of its neighbors and US. I believe they will need to make adjustments to their business practice and equipment use (doors closed, muted nuisance sound). Does the city have direct contact information for an owner representative to discuss the matter? Philip Schroeder Community Services Team Supervisor Wheat Ridge Police Department 7500 W 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us office: 303-235-2998 cell: 303-882-5145 From: Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 7:05 AM To: Allison Scheck <ascheck@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Eric Kellogg <EKellogg@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Lucas Hunt <lhunt@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Leo Lopez <llopez@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise We are aware of the car wash complaint and have an open case. We have had several calls from Gretchen who lives next door to the car wash. It was explained to her that we are doing a decibel reading on Tuesday. The decibel reader is located in the PD equipment room and available for Patrol as needed to conduct investigations as well. Philip Schroeder Community Services Team Supervisor Wheat Ridge Police Department 7500 W 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us office: 303-235-2998 cell: 303-882-5145 From: Allison Scheck <ascheck@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 6:47 AM To: Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Marie Trujillo <mtrujill@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Eric Kellogg <EKellogg@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Lucas Hunt <lhunt@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Leo Lopez Exhibit OO - Page 4 of 7 5 <llopez@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Fwd: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise Hi everyone - can we confirm who has the ball on this one please? This business is properly licensed and has no licensing and tax issues that we are aware of. Phil and Marie - is this something your team can look into from the noise perspective? Please speak up if you don’t think that’s the right path. Thanks! a. Begin forwarded message: From: Patrick Goff <pgoff@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Date: March 7, 2025 at 1:45:07 PM EST To: Phil Schroeder <pschroed@ci.wheatridge.co.us>, Leo Lopez <llopez@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Eric Kellogg <EKellogg@ci.wheatridge.co.us>, Allison Scheck <ascheck@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise More on the carwash complaint. Thanks Patrick Goff City Manager City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303-235-2805 (office) 303-995-6465 (mobile) www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Exhibit OO - Page 5 of 7 6 From: Scott Ohm <SOhm@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 10:29 AM To: Patrick Goff <pgoff@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: 5900 W. 44th ave. Carwash blower noise Patrick, Jan called me from today and operates a business at . Holistic Care for Animals. She has noise complaint about the carwash business to the north at 5900 W. 44th ave. She said new blowers were installed and are very loud, can run 24 hours a day / 7 days a week. The property owners/managers don't like to close the bay doors which would dampen the sound due to humidity. This also is affecting other nearby residential neighbors and they allege the sound is at at 80db. Can you have staff confirm if the business is allowed to operate 24 hrs a day and also have someone talk to Jan and have code enforcement take a sound db reading at the carwash? Thank you, Scott Ohm City Council District 2 720.722.1173 Exhibit OO - Page 6 of 7 7Exhibit OO - Page 7 of 7 City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us May 6, 2024 Christian Tidwell Designer Hover Architecture RE: Autowash Lakeside Site Plan and CDs Approval Christian, The City of Wheat Ridge has reviewed the most recent site plan and civil construction document submittal for 5900 W. 44th Avenue (“Autowash Lakeside”) and has no remaining comments or concerns. As such, the project is considered approvable. Final approval and permit issuance are pending plat approval and final submittal of signed and sealed documents and payment of applicable permit fees. Please feel free to be in touch with any questions. Sincerely, Alayna Olivas-Loera Planner II Exhibit PP - Page 1 of 1 1 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Ph 303.235.2846 Fax 303.235.2857 Approval of Site Plan The Autowash Lakeside site plan for an automatic carwash development at 5900 W. 44th Avenue and zoned Commercial-One (C-1) (Case No. WSP-23-01) is hereby approved for the following reasons: 1. The site plan complies with zoning regulations in Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 2. A special use permit for the carwash use was approved, Case No. SUP-23-01. 3. The site plan corresponds with an approvable plat for the property, Autowash Lakeside Consolidation Plat, Case No. MS-24-04. and with the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, the subdivision plat shall be approved and recorded. 2. The developer shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement prior to recordation of the subdivision plat. 3. Prior to commencing work on site, building permits shall be obtained and issued in accordance with the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. 4. Building permit submittals shall be consistent with the site plan. _______________________________ ________________ Lauren Mikulak, AICP Date Community Development Director July 5, 2024 Exhibit QQ - Page 1 of 1 Memorandum TO: Lauren Mikulak, Community Development Director FROM: Alayna Olivas-Loera, Planner II DATE: January 16, 2024 SUBJECT: SUP-23-01/Auto Wash Lakeside Auto Wash Lakeside, which will be located at 5900 W. 44th Avenue, has applied for a Special Use Permit under case number SUP-23-01 to allow for a new automatic carwash. The site is zoned Commercial-One (C-1) and is approximately 19,450 square feet (.447 acres). The property currently contains a self-service carwash. The intent is to demolish the existing carwash and construct a new four-bay automatic carwash. A neighborhood meeting was held on August 30, 2022 prior to the formal application being submitted. No objections were received during the meeting. The application was submitted on February 13, 2023. Staff reviewed the application for completeness and sent it out on a two-week referral to external agencies on February 14, 2023. No objections were received during the referral period. Public notification signs were posted on the property on December 18, 2023 for a two-week period, and mailings were sent to adjacent properties. No objections were received during the public notification period. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Special Use Permit for the following reasons: 1.The special use will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The site has functioned as a self-serve carwash for a number of years and the use will not be changing. 2.The special use will not create or contribute to blight in the neighborhood by virtue of physical or operational characteristics. The redevelopment of the site for a new automatic carwash will revitalize the site and bring it into conformance with the current code and design standards. 3.The special use will not create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing zoning for the property. 4.The special use will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off the site. 5.The property is appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. 6.The special use will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, Exhibit RR - Page 1 of 2 2 schools and other public facilities and services. 7.There is a history of compliance by the applicant and/or property owner with Code requirements and prior conditions, if any, regarding the subject property. 8.The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. 9.The proposed special use promotes goals and outcomes from applicable portions of the City’s comprehensive plan and any subarea plan applicable to the subject property. And with the following conditions: 1.The special use shall be consistent with the representations depicted in the application materials. 2.The architectural upgrades and site plan modifications shall be consistent with the SUP Site Plan and Elevations. 3.A building permit shall be obtained from the Wheat Ridge Building Division to complete all new construction. 4.The approval of this special use is granted to the applicant and may not be inherited by subsequent operators. 5.A Public Improvement Agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of a vertical building permit. Exhibit RR - Page 2 of 2