HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-16-2025 - Study Session Agenda Packet STUDY SESSION AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
Monday, June 16, 2025
6:30 p.m.
This meeting will be conducted as a virtual meeting, and in person, at: 7500 West 29th
Avenue, Municipal Building, Council Chambers.
City Council members and City staff members will be physically present at the
Municipal building for this meeting. The public may participate in these ways:
1. Attend the meeting in person at City Hall. Use the appropriate roster to sign
up to speak upon arrival.
2. Provide comment in advance at www.wheatridgespeaks.org (comment by
noon on June 16, 2025)
3. Virtually attend and participate in the meeting through a device or phone:
Click here to pre-register and provide public comment by Zoom (You must
preregister before 6:00 p.m. on June 16, 2025)
4. View the meeting live or later at www.wheatridgespeaks.org, Channel 8, or
YouTube Live at https://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/view
Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings
sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. The City will upon request, provide auxiliary
aids and services leading to effective communication for people with disabilities,
including qualified sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, documents
in Braille, and other ways of making communications accessible to people who have
speech, hearing, or vision impairments. To request auxiliary aid, service for effective
communication, or document in a different format, please use this form or contact
ADA Coordinator, (Kelly McLaughlin at ada@ci.wheatridge.co.us or 303-235-2885) as
soon as possible, preferably 7 days before the activity or event.
Public Comment on Agenda Items
1. Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Developer
2. Municipal Facility Feasibility and Planning Draft Report
3. Property Acquisition for Public Works and Parks Shops
4. Staff Report(s)
5. Elected Officials’ Report(s)
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patrick Goff, City Manager
Lauren Mikulak, Community Development Director
DATE: June 16, 2025
SUBJECT: Legacy Lutheran Campus Master Developer
ISSUE:
On May 20th, Intermountain Health announced that E5X Management, Inc. is under
contract to purchase and redevelop the former Lutheran Medical Campus. The
anticipated closing date is September 30, 2025. E5X Principal Chris Elliott will introduce
himself and his company and his vision for redevelopment of the 100-acre site at the June 16th study session.
PRIOR ACTION:
• City Council approved the Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan on October 25,
2021.
• City Council passed a resolution on May 13, 2024, supporting the initiation of a
legislative zone change for the Lutheran Legacy Campus.
• Wheat Ridge voters voted 67% in favor in November 2024 to amend the Wheat
Ridge City Charter to enable implementation of the Master plan.
• City Council approved the new mixed-use zoning regulations for the Lutheran Legacy Campus on January 27, 2025.
• City Council approved a Service Plan and Intergovernmental Agreement for the
Legacy Metropolitan District Nos. 1-12 on February 24, 2025.
• City Council approved a rezoning of the property to Mixed Use – Lutheran Legacy Campus on April 28, 2025.
BACKGROUND:
Intermountain Health used a comprehensive Request for Proposal process to gauge interest from the developer community for the sale of the former Lutheran Medical
Campus. After thoroughly evaluating ten distinct proposals, Intermountain narrowed the
search down to three firms. City staff interviewed the finalists and provided feedback to
Intermountain. Ultimately, Intermountain finalized terms and conditions and are under
contract to sell the property to E5X.
E5X Management, Inc., headquartered in Centennial, Colorado, is a leading real estate development firm specializing in mixed-use, master-planned communities throughout
Study Session Memo – Legacy Metropolitan District Service Plan
February 10, 2025
Page 2
the Denver metro area. With a strong focus on sustainable design and community-
centered planning, E5X delivers thoughtfully crafted communities ranging in size from
10 to over 3,000 acres.
E5X projects primarily feature residential components, including single-family detached
homes, townhomes, and multi-family residences complemented by integrated
commercial, office, and other compatible land uses. Each E5X community is designed
to support vibrant, livable neighborhoods and typically includes generous open space.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDATIONS:
This is an informational study session only and no action from City Council is required.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Lutheran Legacy Illustrative Plan
2. Lutheran Legacy Campus Presentation
LUTHERAN LEGACY Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Illustrative Plan 14, May 28th, 2025
W. 38th Ave.
DU
D
L
E
Y
S
T
.
CIVIC
EXISTING CHAPEL,
& BLUE HOUSE
OPEN SPACE
W. 32nd Ave.
N.L
u
t
h
e
r
a
n
P
r
k
w
y
.
Lu
t
h
e
r
a
n
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
W
.
Roc
k
y
M
t
n
D
i
t
c
h
MAX. 30’ HT.2.5 STORIES ON
PERIMETER
MAX. 30’ HT.2.5 STORIES ON PERIMETER
HOMES FRONT
ON TO DUDLEY ST. WITH A 15’ FRONT
SETBACK
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION
TO DUDLEY ST.
ON STREET PARKING
ADDED
MIN. 30’ BUFFERMIN. 30’ BUFFER
MAX. 30’ HT.2.5 STORIES ON
PERIMETER
PARK
OPEN
SPACE
PARK
PARK
OPEN SPACE
OPEN SPACE
MAX. 30’ HT.2.5 STORIES ON
PERIMETER
PA-1
APARTMENTS
PA-6DUP-1
PA-2
TOWNHOME
PA-4
DUP 2
PA-4SFD 2
PA-3TOWNHOME
PA-4SFD 1
PA-5SFD 3
PA-5
SFD 4
PA-2
APARTMENTS
PA-5
SFD 3
PA-5SFD 4
PA-4SFD 1
PA-7APARTMENTS
PLANNING AREA PRODUCT/LAND USE LOT/BLDG SIZE ACRES NUMBER OF UNITS
PA-2 TOWNHOME (20' X 60')6.30 92
PA-3 TOWNHOME (20' X 65')1.80 26
SFD-1 (50' X 90')SFD-1 = 36
SFD-2 (34' X 60')SFD-2 = 39
DUP-1 (25'x75')SFD-3 = 90
165
SFD-3 (45'x100')SFD-3 = 37
SFD-4 (50' X 100')SFD-4 =33
70
DUP-1 (25'x75')DUP-1 = 30
DUP-2 (30'x85')DUP-1 = 36
66
PA-8 SENIOR APARTMENTS 0.93 50
1320TOTAL UNIT COUNT
PA-7 WRAP APARTMENTS 4.25 349
PA-5 SINGLE FAMILY-
DETACHED 15.9
PA-6 DUPLEX 4.7
LUTHERAN CONCEPTUAL PLAN 14
PA-1 WRAP APARTMENTS 3.14
PA-4 SFD 17.78
251PA-2 SURFACE PARK
APARTMENTS 6.6
251
Illustrative depiction, subject to change.
PA-6DUP-2
PA-8
SENIOR
garage access
61 spots
152 spots
LEGACY.
Mixed-Use Lutheran Legacy Campus Conceptual Planning
Welcome to LEGACY
The primary goal of the Conceptual Planning efforts,
is to ensure compliance with the existing Master
Plan that established a development framework to
guide the future planning and development on the
Lutheran Campus.
The Development Framework is intended
to communicate key development parameters
and considerations to ensure that any future
redevelopment of the Campus reflects the values
and priorities expressed by the community
throughout the planning process.
.02
History of Lutheran
legacy campus
A Once in a Generation Opportunity
It is extremely rare to have an opportunity to re-envision a
property of this scale, especially with such a central
location. And it is even less likely in a community like Wheat
Ridge that is largely built out. SCL Health will maintain
its hospice program and the Foothills medical office
building at the existing campus, the remainder
of the property is being conceptually planned utilizing the
Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan as the guiding
document for decision making.
.03
2021 2025
Our Professional Team
E5X Management
Developer, Project
Management
PCS Group, Inc.
Urban Design, Landscape
Architecture
KT Engineering
Civil Engineering
Davis & Ceriani
Legal Services
.04
LSC Transportation
Traffic Engineering
Ecological Resource
Consultants
Environmental Consultant
AG Wassenaar
Geotechnical Engineer
Brownstein Hyatt Farber
Schrek
URA Legal Services
.05
Lutheran legacy
Conceptual Plan
A Once in a Generation Opportunity
The Conceptual Planning has been heavily
influenced by the community involvement
through the City of Wheat Ridge Master
Planning efforts. In general, lower density
housing with a maximum height of 30’ is
along the perimeter of the Campus.
Internal to the property we anticipate a
mix of higher density residential uses.
The Conceptual Plan highlights the
preservation of the existing Chapel and
Blue House.
.06
Lutheran legacy
Park and Open
Space Plan
The initial Park and Open Space planning
ensures that the overall campus will meet
the minimum 20% of the property as
required in the City of Wheat Ridge
Master Plan.
.07
Lutheran legacy
Building
Heights
This exhibit depicts how the Conceptual
Plan meets the requirements as depicted
in the Campus Master Plan.
.08Air View of Campus from the south west
.09Entry from 38th Avenue
.10Entry from 38th Avenue
.11Entry from 38th Avenue
.12Secondary Entry Concept – complimentary to the existing clock tower
.13Dudley Street – low brick wall and open fence with columns
.14Dudley Park – park features a custom fox play structure
.15Rocky Mountain Trail – part of the trail system through the campus
.16Rocky Mountain Park – along the trail is a park with plazas, seating, pond,
community connections, and play areas.
.17Rocky Mountain Park – along the trail is a park with plazas, seating, pond,
community connections, and play areas.
.18Rocky Mountain Park – along the trail is a park with plazas, seating, pond,
community connections, and play areas.
Thanks.
For Watching, Discussion
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patrick Goff, City Manager
Kent Kisselman, Interim Public Works Director
Dan Beiers, Interim Facilities and Fleet Manager
DATE: June 16, 2025
SUBJECT: Municipal Facility Feasibility and Planning Draft Report
ISSUE:
During the 2022 budget process, City Council asked staff to prepare a Facilities Master
Plan (FMP) to assess the current and future needs of City facilities. The City contracted with Stantec to develop a comprehensive FMP for all primary City functions, with the
goal of developing a roadmap and living documents for facility decisions over the next
decade. City Council consensus was reached at the February 5, 2024, study session to
move forward with the recommendations of the FMP and to bring back next steps.
One next step was to contract with an architectural firm to explore the potential reuse of
the Lutheran Legacy Campus as a future home for the Wheat Ridge City Hall and Police
Department. City Council approved a contract with Anderson Hallas Architects on
September 23, 2024 for this scope of work. Representatives from Anderson Hallas will
present recommended alternatives derived from their work at the June 16, 2025 study session.
PRIOR ACTION:
• City Council approved a contract with Stantec Architecture, Inc. on June 13, 2022 for
the development of a FMP
• Recommendations from the FMP were presented to City Council at the February 5,
2024 study session where consensus was reached to move forward with next steps
• City Council approved a contract with Anderson Hallas Architects on September 23,
2024 to conduct a City Facility Feasibility and Planning Study
BACKGROUND:
The Lutheran Hospital comprises a complex series of twelve additions built around the
original 1921 Pavilion, which served as the foundation of a former tuberculosis treatment center. These additions span nearly eight decades of development, ranging
from a significant 1932 expansion to the final construction completed in 2008.
Study Session Memo – Municipal Facility Feasibility and Planning Draft Report
June 16, 2025
Page 2
The Campus additions vary significantly in
scale and condition, from modest annexes
to expansive multi-story wings. Each
addition reflects the operational needs and construction practices of its era,
resulting in a patchwork of building
systems and architectural styles. Central
heating and hot water are provided by a
main mechanical plant, while ventilation is handled by individual units distributed
throughout the various additions. This
layered development poses both
challenges and opportunities for adaptive
reuse.
Following evaluation of the existing
conditions of the Hospital, four initial
options were explored to evaluate
potential adaptive reuse strategies and new construction opportunities across the Campus. Each option considered the architectural character and condition, structural
feasibility, existing systems, program compatibility, and long-term suitability for a new
City Hall and Police Department.
The four initial scenarios included the reuse of two newer additions (from 1984 and 2008), a hybrid approach incorporating the historic structures with the 1960s addition,
and an entirely new ground-up building. Following review with the City and E5X, further
investigation was directed toward the Historic Preservation and Reuse Option. This
approach offered the most promising balance between honoring the site’s legacy,
supporting sustainable practices, and meeting programmatic goals. This resulted in two refined scenarios centered around the 1921 and 1932 structures: one scenario retaining
and rehabilitating the 1960s addition,
and another that removes most of
the 1960s construction in favor of a
new addition and courtyard to improve daylight access and
workspace quality.
Both reuse scenarios include
preservation of the 1932 chapel—for potential community
use—the adaptive reuse of the 1932
Women’s Wing, and the restoration
of the remaining wall of the original
Study Session Memo – Municipal Facility Feasibility and Planning Draft Report
June 16, 2025
Page 3
1921 pavilion. Each scenario also
proposes a re-imagined central
pavilion, maintaining its historic
shape while adapting it for contemporary civic functions and
modern building materials. The
study also evaluated each option for
site planning, adjacencies, phasing
strategies, and preliminary cost implications, recognizing the
balance between preservation goals,
programmatic needs, and long-term
flexibility for city operations.
The 1960s Rehab and Courtyard Alternatives both share a foundational commitment
to preserving and celebrating the most significant historic elements of the Lutheran
Legacy Campus. Central to both schemes is the rehabilitation of the 1932 Women’s
Wing, the retention and restoration of the remaining 1921 Pavilion wall, and the
preservation of the 1932 Chapel—though the latter is not currently programmed for City use. These elements are valued not only for their architectural character, but also for
their deep ties to the site’s history as a former tuberculosis treatment center and
longstanding healthcare campus.
Careful surgical demolition of surrounding structures is required to protect the exterior integrity of these historic components. In both alternatives, the preserved masonry
facades will be cleaned, repointed, and stabilized, with previously infilled openings
thoughtfully reopened to allow for daylight and visual connection. These efforts aim to
retain the original craftsmanship and presence of the historic buildings while adapting
them for new civic uses that honor their legacy.
Additionally, both
alternatives include a
re-imagined version of
the original 1921central pavilion, positioned
between the restored
west wing, and a re-
imagined east wing to
serve other community functions. The shared
commitment to
integrating green space,
restoring historic
Study Session Memo – Municipal Facility Feasibility and Planning Draft Report
June 16, 2025
Page 4
materials, and designing purpose-built environments reflects the City’s and design
team’s shared vision: to create a civic destination that is respectful of its past,
responsive to present needs, and adaptable for the future, all in service to the Wheat
Ridge community.
The team has also identified the potential for expanding the civic campus with a future
public library to serve as a connecting element between the re-imagined central pavilion
and the existing chapel. This concept introduces exciting programmatic alignment
between City Hall functions and library services, reinforcing the idea of a cohesive, community-centered civic campus. The integration of civic administration with
educational and cultural resources would promote greater public engagement,
accessibility, and shared use of space. In this vision, the preserved chapel could be
adaptively reused as an event center or community hall—providing flexible gathering
space for programs, ceremonies, or public meetings, and reinforcing the site’s legacy as a place of care, connection, and civic identity.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
To support early decision making and compare the feasibility of the two alternatives, a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate has been developed as part of this
study. This estimate provides a high-level view of projected construction costs for both
the 1960s Rehab and Courtyard alternatives. It includes broad cost assumptions, built-in
contingencies, and allowances to account for the preliminary nature of the design and
unknown conditions typical at this stage. If the project progresses and the design is further developed, this estimate will be refined through more detailed quantity takeoffs,
updated unit costs, and alignment with market conditions.
Study Session Memo – Municipal Facility Feasibility and Planning Draft Report
June 16, 2025
Page 5
Alternative #1 – 1960s Rehab
Cost/SF Total
Site Improvements 200,000 sq. ft. $27.60 $5,519,896
Renovation 46,700 sq. ft. $705.27 $32,936,289
Pavilion & Addition 76,000 sq. ft. $658.80 $50,068,827
Parking Garage 50,000 sq. ft. $137.13 $6,856,313
Total $95,381,325
Alternative #2 – Courtyard
Cost/SF Total
Site Improvements 200,000 sq. ft. $29.07 $5,813,508
Renovation 26,400 sq. ft. $725.19 $19,144,930
Pavilion & Addition 76,000 sq. ft. $658.80 $50,068,827
Parking Garage 50,000 sq. ft. $137.13 $6,856,313
Total $81,883,577
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the comprehensive findings from the Facilities Master Plan (FMP), feasibility
analysis of the Lutheran Legacy Campus, and architectural studies conducted by
Anderson Hallas Architects, the following recommendations are offered for City Council consideration as next steps in the planning and decision-making process:
1. Advance the Courtyard Alternative as the Preferred Option
Given its:
• Lower overall projected cost ($81.9M vs. $95.4M),
• Greater enhancement of workspace daylight and quality, and
• Preservation of key historic assets while optimizing modern functionality,
Council should consider endorsing the Courtyard Alternative as the preferred reuse strategy. This approach provides the best balance between cost, long-term operational
suitability, and historic preservation.
2. Commission a Refined Design Development and Cost Estimation Phase
With Council endorsement of a preferred alternative:
• Direct staff to contract for the next phase of design development and detailed cost estimating, including:
o Updated construction pricing based on market conditions,
o Cost/benefit analyses of material reuse and energy efficiency upgrades,
Study Session Memo – Municipal Facility Feasibility and Planning Draft Report
June 16, 2025
Page 6
o Integrated sustainability and green infrastructure strategies.
3. Launch a Community Engagement Strategy
Ensure community members understand and are invested in the future of the Lutheran
Legacy Campus by:
• Hosting community open houses and site tours,
• Providing visual materials to explain design concepts and phasing,
• Offering opportunities for public input on potential uses (e.g., community event space in the chapel, library integration).
4. Explore Funding Opportunities and Partnerships
Direct staff to research and present options for:
• Historic preservation grants (State Historic Fund, National Trust),
• Sustainability funding (e.g., energy efficiency incentives, green building rebates),
• Philanthropic partnerships for civic or cultural space enhancements (e.g., library
or community hall),
• Bonding strategies or capital improvement reallocations to support implementation.
• Development agreement with E5X to include the potential sale of the current City
Hall Campus
5. Consider Future Library Integration as a Strategic Expansion
• The conceptual integration of a public library presents a meaningful long-term
opportunity.
• Council should direct staff to explore partnership models with Jefferson County
Public Library and assess alignment with city strategic goals and future funding potential.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Municipal Facility Feasibility & Planning Report
Ci of Wheat Ridge
MUNICIPAL FACILITY FEASIBILITY & PLANNING
LUTHERAN CAMPUS
MAY 13TH, 2025
DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 1
Washington Avenue
Golden, Colorado
ANDARCH.COM
CRAFT BALANCE WHIMSY
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
TA
B
L
E
O
F
C
O
N
T
E
N
T
S
D
R
A
F
T
Executive Summary
Existing Conditions
Exploration of Alternatives
Program
Overall Program
Parking Analysis
Space Adjacency Diagrams
Alternatives Introduction
Alternatives Floor Plates
Alternative: s Rehab
Site Plan
Floor Plan Diagrams
Opportunities & Challenges
Alternative: Courtyard
Site Plan
Floor Plan Diagrams
Opportunities & Challenges
Next Steps
Cost Estimate
Phasing Timeline
Appendix
.. Lutheran Campus Presentation Slides
Existing Conditions Narratives
Table of Contents
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Executive Summary
Project Description
BACKGROUND
This feasibility study explores the potential reuse of a portion of the Lutheran Legacy
Campus as a future home for the Wheat Ridge City Hall and Police Department. The
site, originally developed in the early th century as a tuberculosis tr eatment center,
contains several historic structures of architectural and cultural signiicance obscured
by many layers of building additions. Our study began with a walk-through of the
vacated hospital complex to assess the viability of adapting various building sections
of the hospital complex - for new civic use. Along with the City, the project team quickly
identiied several historic portions - including a remnant wall from the pavilion and
its lanking wings, the chapel, and several mid- to late- th century a dditions -
that provided potential for reimagining a modern, eficient civic fac ility.
EXPLORATION
Four initial scenarios were considered, including the reuse of two newer additions (from
and ), a hybrid approach incorporating the historic structur es with the s
addition, and an entirely new ground-up building. Following review with city stakeholders
and their development partner, further investigation was directed toward adaptive
reuse strategies that prioritize the preservation of the site’s most historically signiicant
components. This resulted in two reined scenarios centered around th e and
structures: one scenario retaining and rehabilitating the s add ition, and another
that removes most of the s construction in favor of a new addition and court yard to
improve daylight access and workspace quality.
ALTERNATIVES
Both reuse scenarios include preservation of the chapel—for pote ntial community
use—the adaptive reuse of the Women’s Wing, and the restoration of the remaining
wall of the original pavilion. Each scenario also proposes a re-imag ined central
pavilion, maintaining its historic shape while adapting it for contemporary civic functions
and modern building materials. The study also evaluated each option for site planning,
adjacencies, phasing strategies, and preliminary cost implications, recognizing the
balance between preservation goals, programmatic needs, and long-term lexibility for
city operations.
The design team is enthusiastic about the opportunity to honor the site’s unique
history while crafting a new civic presence for the city of Wheat Ridge. Although the
transformation would involve selective demolition of large portions of the former
hospital, the preserved elements offer a meaningful architectural anchor and a tangible
connection between the community’s past and future. We look forward to continued
collaboration with the City as we further develop these concepts into purpose-built,
resilient, and inspiring spaces that support evolving municipal needs.
EX
E
C
U
T
I
V
E
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
FEASIBILITY STUDY
D
R
A
F
T
.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
LUTHERAN LEGACY CAMPUS
The Lutheran Legacy Campus comprises a complex series of twelve additions built
around the original Pavilion, which served as the foundation of a form er tuberculosis
treatment center. These additions span nearly eight decades of development, ranging
from a signiicant expansion to the inal construction completed in . Following
the relocation of healthcare services to the new Lutheran Hospital, the campus has been
vacated and is no longer in active use.
The campus additions vary signiicantly in scale and condition, from mod est annexes
to expansive multi-story wings. Each addition relects the operation al needs and
construction practices of its era, resulting in a patchwork of building systems and
architectural styles. Central heating and hot water are provided by a main mechanical
plant, while ventilation is handled by individual units distributed throughout the various
additions. This layered development poses both challenges and opportunities for
adaptive reuse.
Existing Conditions
Building Addition Timeline Site Plan
(Wall)
FEASIBILITY STUDY
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
D
R
A
F
T
Current Condition Isonometric Site Plan
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
LUTHERAN LEGACY CAMPUS ALTERNATIVES
Following evaluation of the existing conditions, four initial options were explored to
evaluate potential adaptive reuse strategies and new construction opportunities across
the Lutheran Legacy Campus. Each option considered the architectural character and
condition, structural feasibility, existing systems, program compatibility, and long-term
suitability for a new City Hall and Police Department.
The Brutalist Addition was examined in three distinct segments aft er it was
discovered that this wing had been constructed over a span of more than a decade,
potentially allowing for selective reuse. Its robust materiality and secure character made
it an intriguing option for housing the Police Department. However, the disconnected
construction phases and the complexity of integrating civic functions into its deep,
opaque loor plates presented notable challenges.
The Tower Option focused on the upper, vacant loors of the campus’s mos t recent
addition. These loors offered generous views and more adap table loor plates conducive
to daylighting. Despite these advantages, the overall square footage far exceeded the
City’s needs, and the presence of necessary additional tenants and circuitous circulation
issues complicated both security and public wayinding. Establish ing a distinct civic
identity along th Avenue within this coniguration was also consider ed less than ideal.
The New Construction Option offered the greatest lexibility, allowi ng the team to
tailor a purpose-built civic facility precisely to the City’s current and future needs.
However, the team weighed this opportunity against the site’s capacity constraints
and the sustainability concerns related to full demolition. Issues of embodied carbon,
construction waste, and loss of architectural heritage inluenced th e decision to look
elsewhere.
Ultimately, the Historic Preservation and Reuse Option was selected for deeper
exploration. This approach offered the most promising balance between honoring
the site’s legacy, supporting sustainable practices, and meeting programmatic goals.
The design team was particularly drawn to the layered way the historic additions had
been constructed—making selective retention and reinvention a feasible path forward.
The following slide summarizes this alternative and its three sub-options; the full
presentation of the four initial options can be found in the appendix.
Exploration of Alternatives
SITE ANALYSIS
EX
E
C
U
T
I
V
E
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
D
R
A
F
T
+
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS DRAFT
2.
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
R
E
I
M
A
G
I
N
E
D
O
P
T
I
O
N
S
2. Historic Re-imagined Options
Wing A - + s Wing B - + s + Pavilion + Colonnade
Alt Program Examples:
• Library
• Police Department & Municipal Courts
• Non-proit Ofices
• Retail
Legend:
Pavilion
Outdoor Space
Wing C - + Pavilion + Colonnade
Potential Site LayoutRe-imagined
PAVILION
s
SITE ANALYSIS
OV
E
R
A
L
L
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
D
R
A
F
T
Department Current
Future
20yr Total Office SF
Dedicated
Spaces SF Total SF*
Total +
TARE PO Wrkst Total SWrk Building
Primary
Adjacencies
Secondary
Adjacencies
Tertiary
Adjacencies
CMO City Manager 8 8 916 590 1506 1882.5 4 4 8 0 M 1932 AD CD Lobby CMO
CD Community Development 28 28 1728 1380 3108 3885 7 12 19 9 H 1921 & 1932 AD, CMO, Lobby CD
MC Municipal Courts 12 12 1276 4720 5996 7495 6 4 10 0 H Addition Courts PD, Lobby Finance MC
AD Administration 33 33 2956 830 3786 4732.5 14 19 33 0 L Pavilion CMO CD Comm Rm AD
F Finance (AD)12 12 1068 1068 1335 5 7 12 0 L Pavilion PD, MC, HR F
CC City Clerk (AD)2 2 184 240 424 530 1 1 2 0 M Pavilion AD F, EO CC
CO Communications (AD)2 2 184 184 230 1 1 2 0 M Pavilion AD EO CO
IT IT/AV (AD)8 8 568 500 1068 1335 1 7 8 0 L Pavilion RM, AD IT
HR Human Resources (AD)5 5 748 180 928 1160 4 1 5 0 L Pavilion RM F, AD HR
AD Misc AD (RM, AD, EO)4 4 388 388 485 2 2 4 0 M Pavilion EO, AD, CC HR, IT, CO AD
PD Police Department 147 147 26017 35123 H 1932 & Addition Sally Port FIN, MC PR, Courts PD
PW Public Works 35 35 L P Campus
PR Parks & Recreation 69 69 M P Campus
Total Lutheran Campus 228 0 228 6876 7520 40413 53118 31 39 70 9
Total City Hall 81 0 81 6876 7520 14396 17995 31 39 70 9
Total City of Wheat Ridge 332 0 332 6876 7520 40413 53118 31 39 70 9
Direct
Connection Same Floor Same
Building
FTE Square Footage Office Type Count
In-Person
Public
Interaction
Adjacencies
Category Qty SF TSF
Public Spaces Full Building 14890.5
Vestibule 1 300 405
Lobby 1 1000 1350
Community Room Warming
Kitchen 1 300 405
Community Room 1 2000 2700
Public Meeting Room 1 630 850.5
Café 1 1000 1350
Gallery 1 500 675
Core 3 1000 4050
Municipal Courtroom 1 2300 3105
Shared Spaces City Hall 25312.5
Large Conference Room 3 1950 7897.5
Medium Conference Room 2 900 2430
Small Conference Room 4 1200 6480
Huddle Rooms 2 360 972
Phone Booths 4 220 1188
Welness Rooms 2 150 405
Collaboration Space 1 2000 2700
Break Room 1 400 540
Exterior Break Space 1 2000 2700
Locker Room 1 2000 2700
40203
93321
10-14
6-8
1-2
10-15
Direct connection to community roomNA
Total Shared SF
Potential for future security
15-20
60
NA
40 (Classroom)
20
3-4
NA
10-15
Total Lutheran
2
1
4-6
25-30
32 EA
One in each department
Seating for Break in Collab Space
Shared seating for Break Room
Variety of seating types, re-arrangeable
Potential moveable partition to Jury
Selection
Conference Room
Benches for resting
One per floor, Stairs, RRs, Elevator
Outdoor seating, Indoor mix of 2 & 4 tops
with bar seating
Seating for 60 in gallery
NotesSeating #
Counter W/ storage and/or wetbar16-20
Overall Program
The program for the Wheat Ridge City Hall and Police Department provides a
foundational framework for understanding current and future spatial needs across
civic departments. It includes core City Hall functions—Administration Services, City
Manager’s Ofices, Community Development, and Municipal Courts—with a second
phase of study anticipated for Parks and Recreation and Public Works, envisioned
as a separate yet integrated civic campus. The Police Department is also detailed
comprehensively, with total and divisional space allocations following the City Hall
structure.
Developed through a collaborative and multi-step process, the program draws on
previous planning documents, walkthroughs of existing facilities, and direct staff
engagement. Departmental questionnaires and interviews with leadership helped clarify
operational needs, worklow challenges, and desired improvement s, allowing the team
to form a holistic picture of departmental functions and relationships.
The program includes dedicated staff and department spaces and incorporates a %
TARE factor for circulation, restrooms, mechanical systems, and other non-assignable
areas. It balances shared and dedicated functions, identiies levels o f public interaction
by department (high, medium, or low), and highlights preferred adjacencies—especially
shared staff spaces and secured connections between Municipal Courts and the
Police Department per CJIS (Criminal Justice Information Services) standards. These
relationships are illustrated through diagrammatic layouts later in the report.
This document serves as a lexible planning tool to guide ongoing discuss ions about
space needs, departmental coordination, and long-term operational goals. It will
continue to evolve alongside project development and as the City reine s its service
model and priorities.
FEASIBILITY STUDY
PD
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
D
R
A
F
T
f Wheat Ridge Police Department Staffing Feasibility Planning
Departments
Square
Footage for
Area TARE 35% FL
Staff
Count
Primary
Adjacencies
Secondary
Adjacencies
Chief's Offices 1620 2187 6 NA NA
Records 1118 1509.3 1st 8 Lobby I, B
Traffic 940 1269 8 P, Lockers
Patrol 2733 3689.55 1st 85 Booking, Lockers
CSOs, CP, E,
JCMH
Investigations 3303 4459.05 19 Patrol
CSOs 446 602.1 9 CP, L, Lockers
Evidence 1498 2022.3 1/B 2 Booking, Lockers Patrol
Crime Prevention 754 1017.9 6 P, IV, Lockers
Booking 900 1215 1/B 0 Patrol, Evidence L, R
JCMH 625 843.75 ? Lobby Patrol
Lobby 1110 1498.5 1st 4 R, E, JCMH IV, B
Other 10970 14809.5 0
26017 147
35% TARE
35122.95
Anderson Hallas Architects
PD Program
The Police Department is presented as a breakdown of spatial needs organized into
ten distinct divisions, in addition to shared public-facing functions such as the main
lobby and other communal areas. This approach allows for a clear understanding of
the operational requirements, interdepartmental relationships, and levels of public
interaction speciic to law enforcement. Each division’s unique fun ctions are considered
individually while supporting an integrated and cohesive overall department structure.
The program addresses a range of space types tailored to the needs of each division,
including dedicated staff ofices, secure storage areas, coniden tial printing and
processing rooms, and specialized areas for public interaction. Shared internal support
spaces—such as break rooms, locker rooms, a gym, and a training room—are included to
enhance functionality, promote wellness, and foster a sense of departmental cohesion.
Additionally, the program identiies potential opportunities fo r shared space between
the Police Department and the Municipal Courts.
This program is designed as a lexible and evolving tool, supporting both c urrent
operational demands and future growth. It relects an understanding o f how
physical space impacts police worklow, security, and community pre sence, while also
encouraging collaboration and eficiency. As with the City Hall progr am, adjacencies,
space types, and public access levels will continue to be studied and rein ed to guide
planning decisions throughout the current and following phases of design.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Parking Analysis
BACKGROUND
The following parking count summary is provided for the City’s review in accordance
with the City of Wheat Ridge’s applicable development code requirements. Parking
calculations reference the use-speciic standards outlined in Tabl e of the MU-LLC
Zone District, with assumptions based on anticipated building occupancy, programming,
and operational needs. Where applicable, potential reduction options for proximity to
transit, bicycle/motorcycle accommodation, and shared parking strategies have been
highlighted and applied in accordance with code allowances. The analysis includes a
breakdown by use type, identiies potential reductions, and outlines h ow shared parking
provisions help optimize total parking demand while minimizing the project’s surface
parking footprint.
Below are two parking breakdowns based on potential program uses, with a %
reduction allowed through applicable credits for transit access, bicycle facilities, and
motorcycle parking. The current EX layout provides surface parki ng spaces. When
factoring in additional program uses, and the request for dedicated p olice parking
spaces ( for leet and - for personal vehicles), the inclusion of an un derground
parking garage appears to meet overall parking needs. It also provides secure, less
visually obtrusive parking and reduces the surface area of the site devoted to vehicles.
The following tables break out the parking counts per use. The tables explore two
interpretations of the development code, and the applicable use Table fo llows with
different potential uses highlighted in yellow or blue.
PARKING COUNTS SUMMARY
FEASIBILITY STUDY
PA
R
K
I
N
G
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
D
R
A
F
T
TABLE GENERAL USE GROUPS
Yellow Highlights: Proposed uses for CH and potential adjacent programming in the
civic complex. Blue highlights are uses that may apply and we would want to have
further conversations with the Community Development department to ensure that the
selected uses are the best it.
Per the MU-LLC Regulations:
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Table 3: Parking Requirements
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Use Group
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Minimum Required
D
R
A
F
T
Parking
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Maximum Allowed
D
R
A
F
T
Parking
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Lodging —Hotels or bed
and breakfast
1 space per 2 rooms
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
1.5 spaces per room
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Residential 1 space per unit
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.5 spaces per unit
D
R
A
F
T
Residential, deed
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
affordable
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
0.5 spaces per unit or 0.25
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
spaces per unit if within ¼
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
mile of a fixed guideway
2 spaces per unit
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
mile of a fixed guideway
D
R
A
F
T
transit station or bus rapid
transit transit D
R
A
F
T
mile of a fixed guideway
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Retail or personal servicesD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
3 spaces per 1,000 square
feet
5 spaces per 1,000 square
feet D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
All other uses Uses not specifically listed above shall submit a parking
analysis as part of development review for approval by
the Community Development Director
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Note: Square feet are measured as the gross interior floor area of the entire building or portion of building
devoted to a specific use or uses, less the following: mechanical/utility rooms, restrooms, elevators,
stairwells, show windows, hallways, common areas such as building lobbies, and kitchen areas. For the
purpose of estimating parking requirements where detailed calculations for the above-stated exceptions
are lacking, it shall be assumed that such excepted space covers no more than ten (10) percent of gross
floor area.
*Sec. -. Parking requirements, design standards, and quanti ties
Per Ordinance - Lutheran Legacy Zone District, pgs -
Office/bank 2 spaces per 1,000 square
feet
5 spaces per 1,000 square
feet
4 spaces per 1,000 square
feet
10 spaces per 1,000
square feet
Assembly space including
theaters and places of
worship
1 space per each 5 seats 1 space per 2 seats
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
PARKING REDUCTIONS: SHARED
The following tables and analysis represent potential reductions identiied within the
development code for parking. Yellow highlights call attention to options the team
identiied as potential reductions as applicable per the use, adjacent p ublic transit, and
building program amenities. Based on the urban nature of the project the team wants
to look into possible variance procedures to reduce parking needs.
TABLE : SHARED PARKING MATRIX
Per the shared parking matrix within Sec. -
Parking Analysis Continued
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
*Sec. -. Off-street parking and loading
FEASIBILITY STUDY
PA
R
K
I
N
G
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D
D
R
A
F
T
SHARED PARKING CALCULATIONS
Per section-, Table , the potential shared parking reduction fo r the overall parking
required is a reduction of spaces . The tables below break out the proportions used
and the calculation table. The restrictive number is the Monday - Friday a m to pm
with a total of spaces required.
DEVELOPER’S CURRENT PARKING COUNTS
The following is a graphic showing the existing/developer laid out parking with the
total counts for each area in red. The underlay site plan is from EX, overall th ere are
approximately spacesD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Office 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.05
Restaurant 0.7 1 0 1 1 0.2
Library Institutional non
church 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.05
Assesmbly (Institutional
non church)1 0.2 0 0 0 0.05
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
1 0.2 0 0 0 0.05
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
1 0.2 0 0 0 0.05
Office 260.0 52.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
260.0 52.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
260.0 52.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
Restaurant 10.1 14.4 1.4 10.1 14.4 2.9
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
10.1 14.4 1.4 10.1 14.4 2.9
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
10.1 14.4 1.4 10.1 14.4 2.9
Library Institutional non
church 50.0 10.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 2.5
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
50.0 10.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 2.5
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Assesmbly (Institutional
non church)32.0 6.4 1.6 3.2 3.2 1.6
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Sum
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
82.8 18.5 31.3 35.6 20.0
Proportion
Actual
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
*EX Site Diagram [//] with parking counts overlayed
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
PARKING REDUCTIONS: SITE AND BUILDING PROGRAM
Yellow highlights call attention to potential parking reductions identiied by the team
for review and consideration that are applicable to the site location, site and building
program, and could potentially be accommodated within the scope. Per the top note
“Only one of the following may be utilized per development unless otherwise noted” the
team wanted to explore footnote # Parking Reductions - Variance Procedures.
*Parking reductions—Variance procedures. The community development director may
grant a parking reduction of up to ifty () percent of the required number of v ehicular
parking spaces in accordance with the variance procedures in subsection - C of this
Code.
TABLE : PARKING REDUCTIONS
Per the Parking Reduction matrix within Sec. -:
Parking Analysis Continued
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Space Adjacency Diagrams
BACKGROUND
The following adjacency diagrams illustrate the spatial relationships within City Hall
and Police Department programmatic areas. These diagrams serve as an essential
planning tool to inform the overall layout strategies for the proposed building scenarios.
Adjacency diagrams are used to analyze how departments interact, ensure eficient
worklows, and support operational needs.
By mapping relationships between spaces, the diagrams help identify opportunities
for shared resources, improve circulation patterns, and enhance staff and public
experiences. They also support early decision-making by visualizing priorities such as
security zoning, public access, and staff collaboration. The goal is to create a building
that is both functional and lexible—encouraging impromptu collab oration, streamlining
interdepartmental communication, and supporting long-term adaptability.
ADJACENCY DIAGRAMS LEGEND:
Primary Adjacency
A Primary Adjacency represents a critical functional relationship requiring a direct
physical connection between two spaces or departments. This could include shared
worklows, equipment, or frequent collaboration. These adjacenc ies typically guide key
layout decisions in the planning process.
Secondary Adjacency
Secondary Adjacency relects a desired proximity between spaces wit hout requiring
a direct connection. These areas should be on the same loor or within easy acc ess
to support occasional interaction or shared resources. This level of adjacency offers
lexibility while maintaining operational eficiency.
Tertiary Adjacency
Tertiary Adjacency indicates a looser spatial relationship, where being within the
same building or general area provides value. These connections are beneicial but not
operationally critical. They support convenience, familiarity, and informal collaboration
over physical proximity.
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
TERTIARY
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
DAYLIGHTING
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
FEASIBILITY STUDY
SP
A
C
E
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
C
Y
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
S
D
R
A
F
T
Daylight
Daylight indicates areas where access to natural light is desired, even if views are not
necessary or achievable. These spaces beneit from daylighting stra tegies to improve
occupant comfort and reduce reliance on artiicial lighting. Interi or rooms adjacent to
clerestories, skylights, or light wells may fall into this category, as well as areas where
there are security concerns with views into the space.
Exterior Access
Exterior Access identiies main entrances and exits as well as opportun ities to connect
interior spaces with exterior program elements. These connections are essential for both
public-facing functions and operational eficiency. They also help i ntegrate the building
with the surrounding site and context.
View
This designation highlights spaces where visual access to the outdoors is preferred to
enhance user experience and well-being. Prioritizing views can support mental health,
reduce stress, and create a stronger connection to nature. These spaces are typically
placed along exterior walls with minimal obstructions.
Sight Lines
Sight Lines call out visual connections between key spaces that support wayinding,
security, or functional oversight. These connections can improve intuitive navigation
for visitors and reinforce departmental transparency or supervision needs. They are
particularly important in lobbies, security areas, corridors, or open ofice zones.
Private
Private spaces are designated for departments or functions requiring acoustic
separation, conidentiality, or limited public access. These area s often involve sensitive
work or staff-only operations. Their location and access points are carefully controlled
for security and discretion and/or may be located away from main public access and
activity.
Semi-Private
Semi-private spaces serve internal functions but occasionally interface with the public,
such as shared meeting rooms or service counters. These areas strike a balance between
openness and controlled access. Their design supports limited engagement while
maintaining staff focus and privacy.
Public
Public spaces are intended for general access, accommodating community engagement,
customer service, and civic functions. These areas are designed to be welcoming,
navigable, and inclusive. Placement often considers proximity to entrances, lobbies, and
shared amenities.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
PW Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
Pa
r
k
s
&
R
e
c
Su
p
p
o
r
t
Sp
a
c
e
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
Ci
t
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
’
s
Of
i
c
e
s
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
u
r
t
s
Po
l
i
c
e
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
CD
P&R
AD
MC
S
CMO
PD
Space Adjacency Diagrams
COLOR USAGE THROUGHOUT REPORT
Each color in the legend represents a distinct department or sub-department within
the City’s organizational structure. These colors are consistently applied across
programmatic and adjacency diagrams to enhance visual clarity, improve readability,
and support intuitive recognition of departmental relationships. This system reinforces
the connection between spatial planning and functional organization, helping
stakeholders quickly identify program areas and understand their interactions.
COLOR LEGEND:
FEASIBILITY STUDY
SP
A
C
E
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
C
Y
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
S
D
R
A
F
T
OVERALL ADJACENCY DIAGRAM
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FEASIBILITY STUDY
SP
A
C
E
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
C
Y
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
S
D
R
A
F
T
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICES
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
OVERALL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
FEASIBILITY STUDY
SP
A
C
E
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
C
Y
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
S
D
R
A
F
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
S
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
MISC. ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
HUMAN RESOURCES
FEASIBILITY STUDY
SP
A
C
E
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
C
Y
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
S
D
R
A
F
T
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
FINANCE
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
COMMUNICATIONS
FEASIBILITY STUDY
SP
A
C
E
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
C
Y
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
S
D
R
A
F
T
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
CITY CLERKS
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
MUNICIPAL COURTS
FEASIBILITY STUDY
SP
A
C
E
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
C
Y
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
S
D
R
A
F
T
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
POLICE DEPARTMENT & CH
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
OVERALL POLICE DEPARTMENT
FEASIBILITY STUDY
SP
A
C
E
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
C
Y
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
S
D
R
A
F
T
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARY
DAYLIGHTING
PROGRAM
SHARED
PROGRAM
PRIVATE
SEMI-PRIVATE
PUBLIC PRIMARY
SIGHT LINES
EXTERIOR ACCESS
VIEW
MOVABLE PARTITION
SECONDARY
TERTIARYDAYLIGHTING
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Alternatives Introduction
COMMON TO BOTH
The s Rehab and Courtyard Alternatives both share a foundational co mmitment
to preserving and celebrating the most signiicant historic element s of the Lutheran
Legacy Campus. Central to both schemes is the rehabilitation of the Wo men’s
Wing, the retention and restoration of the remaining Pavilion wall , and the
preservation of the Chapel—though the latter is not currently prog rammed for City
use. These elements are valued not only for their architectural character, but also for
their deep ties to the site’s history as a former tuberculosis treatment center and long-
standing healthcare campus.
Careful surgical demolition of surrounding structures is required to protect the exterior
integrity of these historic components. In both alternatives, the preserved masonry
facades will be cleaned, repointed, and stabilized, with previously inilled openings
thoughtfully reopened to allow for daylight and visual connection. These efforts aim to
retain the original craftsmanship and presence of the historic buildings while adapting
them for new civic uses that honor their legacy.
Additionally, both alternatives include a re-imagined version of the original central
pavilion, positioned between the restored west wing, and a re-imagined east wing to
serve other community functions. The shared commitment to integrating green space,
restoring historic materials, and designing purpose-built environments relects the
City’s and design team’s shared vision: to create a civic destination that is respectful of
its past, responsive to present needs, and adaptable for the future, all in service to the
Wheat Ridge community.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR CIVIC ENRICHMENT
As part of ongoing conversations, the team has also identiied the potenti al for
expanding the civic campus with a future public library to serve as a connecting
element between the re-imagined central pavilion and the existing chapel. This concept
introduces exciting programmatic alignment between City Hall functions and library
services, reinforcing the idea of a cohesive, community-centered civic campus. The
integration of civic administration with educational and cultural resources would
promote greater public engagement, accessibility, and shared use of space. In this vision,
the preserved chapel could be adaptively reused as an event center or community hall—
providing lexible gathering space for programs, ceremonies, or pub lic meetings, and
reinforcing the site’s legacy as a place of care, connection, and civic identity.
FEASIBILITY STUDY
AL
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
S
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
D
R
A
F
T
PLAN VIEW
ALTERNATIVE :
COURTYARD
ALTERNATIVE :
S REHAB
NORTH D
VIEW
North View
D View
Chapel
Chapel
Wall
Chapel
Re-Imagined
Pavilion
Re-Imagined
Pavilion
Re-Imagined
Pavilion
s
N
N
Potential
Library
Potential
Library
Potential
Library
s
Wall
Wall
Courtyard
New Addition
Partial s
Wall
Chapel
Re-Imagined
Pavilion New Addition
LEGEND
LEGEND
BY OTHERS
EXISTING
NEW/
RESKINNED
BY OTHERS
EXISTING
NEW/
RESKINNED
Potential
Library
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Alternatives Floor Plates
FLOOR PLATE ALIGNMENT AND VERTICAL CONNECTIVITY
The historic buildings on the Lutheran Legacy Campus—comprising the Pavilion
wall and the Women’s Wing—are three stories in height. However, due to t he
construction standards and systems of their time, the loor-to-loor h eights in these
structures are lower than those typical in modern civic buildings. These compressed
vertical dimensions pose limitations for integrating contemporary HVAC systems,
achieving an open spatial character, and incorporating modern ceiling and lighting
design elements.
To address these constraints while preserving the integrity of the historic structures,
the new buildings have been strategically designed to complement rather than mirror
the historic loor levels. The irst loors of both the historic and new buil dings are aligned
to allow a continuous and accessible public level, supporting key functions such as
lobbies, reception areas, public-facing departments, and shared amenities. The second
loor of the historic buildings, however, does not align with the second l oor of the new
construction due to these height differences. Instead, the irst loor of t he new buildings
is designed as a vaulted space—creating the vertical clearance necessary to align the
new second loor with the third loor of the historic buildings.
This stepped approach to loor level transitions introduces complexit y in circulation
but also creates opportunities. By intentionally connecting only speciic loor levels, the
design supports public movement across departments—such as the critical relationship
between Community Development and the Permit Desk—while allowing for greater
security and controlled staff access throughout the remainder of City Hall. This balance
of openness and access control relects the City’s operational needs an d promotes an
eficient, welcoming civic environment.
The vaulted spaces on the irst loor of the new buildings are also programma tically
beneicial. Higher ceiling volumes in areas like the lobby, community r oom, and
courtroom accommodate special design elements, greater daylighting potential, and
allow space for concentrated building systems. While the interplay of loor levels can
be dificult to visualize, a series of diagrams have been included in this re port to clearly
illustrate the spatial relationships and points of connection. The overall approach
ensures that the historic character of the existing buildings is preserved, while the new
construction remains lexible, functional, and expressive of a modern c ivic identity.
FEASIBILITY STUDY
AL
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
S
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
T
E
S
D
R
A
F
T
Historic First FloorNew First Floor
Vaulted Space
New Basement
New Second Floor
New Third Floor
Historic Second Floor
Historic Third Floor
Occupied Historic Rooftop
ALTERNATIVE : COURTYARD
FLOOR PLATES SECTION DIAGRAMS
ALTERNATIVE : S REHAB
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
1932 1921 Pavilion 1960s
Depart.11,400 6,000 36,500 27,200 81,100
AD & CC 8,000 8,000
CD 5,000 5,000
CMO 3,200 3,200
MC 5,000 2,600 7,600
PD 7,600 2,000 5,300 16,800 31,700
Shared 2,000 2,200 3,500 7,700
Support 600 600 7,000 3,800 12,000
Public 1,400 4,000 500 5,900
81,100
BASEMENT FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR PAVILION
SECOND
FLOOR
PAVILION
FLOOR
FLOOR
CH & PD
HVAC
STORAGE
EVIDENCE
BOOKING
PD
LOBBY
RECORDS
CH
BREAK
ROOM
SHARED
MEETING
PUBLIC
CAFE
GALLERY
MEETING
SECURITY
PUBLIC
LOBBY
FRONT DESK CH
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
CH
ADMIN
SERVICES
CH
COMMUNITY
COURT
SECOND
FLOOR DOES
NOT CONNECT
TO PAVILION
PD
OFFICES
PAVILION
s
PD
PATROL
MC
OFFICES
CH
CMO
OFFICES
BOOKING
FLOOR
CH
+
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Alternative 1 - 1960s Rehab
REHAB
The s Rehab Alternative explores the adaptive reuse of a portion of the e xisting
Lutheran Legacy Campus, incorporating the s hospital addition a long with key
historic elements—the remaining Pavilion wall and the Women ’s Wing. This
approach retains the largest footprint of existing structures among all studied options,
focusing on the transformation of the s addition into a civic facility w hile honoring
the historic legacy of the site. The strategy aims to balance preservation with pragmatic
upgrades, aligning with the City’s goals of sustainability, civic presence, and responsible
development.
To meet contemporary standards, the s building would undergo a full e xterior and
interior rehabilitation, including hazardous materials abatement, re-cladding with a new
thermal envelope, and systems upgrades. To address natural lighting needs within the
deeper loor plates, the design could incorporate rooftop openings th at bring daylight
into core areas and improve interior quality. An occupied rooftop terrace, accessed from
the third loor of the wall structure, is also envisioned—offering u nique views and
outdoor space for staff respite or informal gatherings. These enhancements would
bring vitality and connectivity to the re-purposed facility, turning a former institutional
building into an active civic hub.
In this scheme, City Hall is accessed from a new formal entry on the north, while the
Police Department has a dedicated entrance on the south, allowing for clear orientation
and functional separation. A re-imagined central pavilion serves as a symbolic and
physical anchor to the site, framed by a formal civic green that enhances public
gathering opportunities and relects the historic footprint. Addi tional green spaces
surround the building, offering moments of respite for staff and the public while tying
the civic campus back to the landscape.
PRELIMINARY SPACE ALLOCATIONS:
SITE ANALYSIS
AL
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
1
1
9
6
0
S
R
E
H
A
B
PRIMARY ENTRY/ENTRY
SIGNAGE/ARTRT
LIBRARY
FLEX SPACPACE
EXISTING
CHAPEL
OUTDOOR R
SEATING
OUTDOOR
SEATING
AMPHITHEATHER AND/OR
SUMMER MOVIE LA LAWN AND
WINTER ICE RINK
STASTAGEGE PLAPLAY FOUNTAITAIN N
OR FEATURE
EXISTING
BLUBLUE HE HOUSE
OUTDOOR R
DINING
ONE-WAY ACCESS ROAD AND PARALLEL PARKING
WALL MURAL /
POTPOTENTIAL RETAITAIL L
ON FIRST LEVEL,
SHARED GARAGE
OUTDOOR R
SEATING
ANGLED PARKING
POTENTIAL RETAIL
ON FIRST LEVLEVELEL
FLEXIBLE
GATHERING
SPACE
DROP-OFF
*EX Site Diagram [//] underlay
UNDERGROUND
CONNECTION
BETWEEN
SECURE PARKING
AND POLICE
DEPARTMENT
SITE ANALYSIS
AL
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
1
1
9
6
0
S
R
E
H
A
B
ion
00 36,500 27,200
00 00
CD 00 00
3,200 3,200
MC 00 7,600
PD 7,600 00 31,700
00 3,500 00
rt 600 600 7,000 3,800
00 4,000 500 00
81,100
BASEMENT FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR PAVILION
SECOND
FLOOR
PAVILION
THIRD FLOOR
HISTORIC
THIRD
FLOOR
CH & PD
HVAC
STORAGE
EVIDENCE
BOOKING
PD
LOBBY
RECORDS
CH
BREAK
ROOM
SHARED
MEETING
PUBLIC
CAFE
GALLERY
MEETING
SECURITY
PUBLIC
LOBBY
FRONT DESK CH
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
CH
ADMIN
SERVICES
CH
COMMUNITY
COURT
SECOND
FLOOR DOES
NOT CONNECT
TO PAVILION
PD
OFFICES
PAVILION
s
PD
PATROL
MC
OFFICES
CH
CMO
OFFICES
BOOKING HISTORIC
THIRD
FLOOR
CH
36,500
CD 00 00
MC 00
PD 31,700
3,500
rt 600 7,000 3,800
00 00
BASEMENT FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR PAVILION
SECOND
FLOOR
PAVILION
FLOOR
FLOOR
CH & PD
HVAC
STORAGE
EVIDENCE
BOOKING
PD
LOBBY
RECORDS
CH
BREAK
ROOM
SHARED
MEETING
PUBLIC
CAFE
GALLERY
MEETING
SECURITY
PUBLIC
LOBBY
FRONT DESK CH
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
CH
ADMIN
SERVICES
CH
COMMUNITY
COURT
SECOND
FLOOR DOES
NOT CONNECT
TO PAVILION
PD
OFFICES
PAVILION
s
PD
PATROL
MC
OFFICES
CH
CMO
OFFICES
BOOKING
FLOOR
CH
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SECOND FLOOR
COMMUNITY
COURTD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
P O
PDCH
Pu
b
l
i
c
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
Po
l
i
c
e
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
PROGRAM MASSING DIAGRAMCOLOR LEGEND
FLOOR PLATE DIAGRAM FOR S REHAB
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Opportunities & Challenges
S REHAB
OPPORTUNITIES
• Improved Access and Parking: A new
drive cut along th Avenue improves
overall site access, and angled parking
increases parking capacity. One-way
vehicular circulation around the building
supports emergency vehicle access and
clear site low. Parking structure allows
for secure parking, sally port and below
grade access to the police department
for secure entry and in-custody transfer.
• Infrastructure and System Eficiency:
Retaining the majority of existing site
infrastructure and utility connections
helps reduce disruption and construction
costs, with only targeted relocations
anticipated. The design leverages
a signiicant portion of the existing
structure, potentially reducing the
project’s embodied carbon. A fully
connected building layout may also
reduce the need for extensive duct and
pipe routing between program areas.
• Historic Preservation and Adaptive
Reuse: This alternative preserves the
s addition along with the wall
and Women’s Wing, providing a
greater level of architectural continuity
and historical context. Adaptive reuse
supports sustainability and aligns with
preservation goals.
• Enhanced Outdoor Spaces: The design
introduces new landscaped areas,
lexible outdoor gathering spaces, and a
larger amphitheater, all of which reduce
impervious surface and enrich the civic
experience. The historic north entrance
is reactivated with improved pedestrian
circulation and a clear civic arrival
sequence, while the south side offers a
more informal, semi-public open space.
• Spatial Eficiency with Modern
Enhancements: The irst and third loors
of the historic and new buildings align
for functional connectivity, while vaulted
irst-loor spaces in the new construction
allow for key programmatic elements
like the lobby, community room, and
courtroom to feature higher ceilings and
more robust building systems. A rooftop
terrace accessible from the historic third
loor provides outdoor amenity space for
staff
FEASIBILITY STUDY
PR
O
S
&
C
O
N
S
D
R
A
F
T
CHALLENGES
• Potential Utility Conlicts: The new
drive and other site modiications may
require relocation of ire protection
infrastructure, electrical panels,
and large transformers, which could
introduce cost and coordination
challenges.
• Access and Circulation Limitations: The
one-way access drive and angled parking
coniguration may reduce user lexibility
and constrain development density on
adjacent parcels.
• Visual and Functional Challenges: The
amphitheater and outdoor gathering
areas on the south may face visual or
spatial conlicts with existing utility
infrastructure (e.g., a water tank), which
could require screening or relocation. The
Police Department’s south-facing entry
has less visibility and civic presence from
th Avenue and is located near future
multifamily residential development.
• Structural and System Integration
Complexity: Retaining the s
structure may necessitate added
structural supports, shear walls, or
bracing to meet current seismic and
snow load codes—especially where
the new pavilion connects to existing
structures. Routing ductwork and
conduit may be challenging due to lower
ceiling heights, limiting lexibility for
HVAC and lighting systems.
• Infrastructure Constraints: Existing
electrical and mechanical room locations
may not align with the new loor
plan, complicating conduit routing,
photovoltaic system integration,
and future maintenance access. The
higher percentage of reused building
area increases the risk of unforeseen
conditions during construction.
• Vertical Circulation Complexity: Due
to differing loor-to-loor heights, the
second loor of the historic building
does not align with the second loor of
the new construction. While circulation
between levels is maintained through
strategic design interventions, this
misalignment may present wayinding
and accessibility challenges that require
careful resolution.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
1932 1921 Pavilion Addition
Depart.11,400 15,000 37,000 35,000 98,400
AD & CC 8,000 8,000
CD 2,300 4,000 6,300
CMO 3,800 3,800
MC 2,000 4,500 6,500
PD 3,800 27,000 30,800
Shared 1,000 4,400 5,000 2,500 12,900
Support 500 1,600 17,000 1,000 20,100
Public 5,000 5,000 10,000
98,400
BASEMENT FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR PAVILION
SECOND
FLOOR
PAVILION
FLOOR
FLOOR
CH
HVAC
STORAGE
PD
LOBBY
RECORDS
CH
SHARED
MEETING
PUBLIC
CAFE
GALLERY
MEETING
PUBLIC
LOBBY
FRONT DESK
CH
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
CH
CMO
OFFICES
PD
BOOKING
EVIDENCE
STORAGE
CH
COMMUNITY
ROOM + COURT
SECOND
FLOOR DOES
NOT CONNECT
TO PAVILION
CH
ADMIN
SERVICES &
BREAK ROOM
PAVILION
ADDITION
PD
PATROL
PD
OFFICES &
TRAINING
ROOM
MC
OFFICES
CH
ADMIN
SERVICES PD
MEETING &
BREAK ROOM
FLOOR
+
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Alternative 2 - Cour ard
COURTYARD
The Courtyard Alternative presents a more transformative approach to the Lutheran
Legacy Campus by removing the majority of the s addition and introduc ing a new
civic structure that thoughtfully integrates with the remaining historic elements. While
the full extent of demolition is still under evaluation, the current concept considers
retaining up to two structural bays of the s building to help stabilize a nd support
the preserved Pavilion wall—an approach that will be further explo red in future
phases. This alternative prioritizes the long-term functionality and design integrity of
the new civic campus while celebrating and preserving key historic components.
By opening up the site between the historic and buildings, this sch eme creates
a central courtyard—bringing daylight, views, and landscape into the heart of the civic
environment. This green space acts as both a physical and psychological connector,
supporting biophilic design strategies that enhance staff well-being, improve public
experience, and provide intuitive orientation throughout the facility. The removal of the
deeper, daylight-restrictive s loor-plates also improves d esign lexibility, enabling
a purpose-built Police Department that better responds to their operational needs and
security requirements.
Both the City Hall and Police Department entries are located along the north façade,
fronting th Avenue, to establish a uniied civic identity and promine nt public presence.
The shared entry sequence and surrounding landscape reinforce the importance of civic
accessibility while activating the exterior with community-oriented green space. This
alternative offers an exciting balance between historic preservation, environmental
quality, and thoughtful new construction—shaping a civic destination that is functional,
forward-thinking, and rooted in place.
PRELIMINARY SPACE ALLOCATIONS:
SITE ANALYSIS
AL
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
2
C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D
PRIMARY ENTRY/ENTRY
SIGNAGE/ART
LIBRARY
FLEX SPACPACE
EXISTING
CHAPEL
OUTDOOR
SEATING
OUTDOOR
SEATING
OUTDOOR
SEATING
AMPHITHEATER AND/OR
SUMMER MOVIE LA LAWN AND
WINTER ICE RINK
STASTAGE PLAY FOUNTAIN
OR FEATURE
EXISTING
BLUBLUE HOUSE
OUTDOOR R
DINING
TWO-WAY ACCESS ROAD
AND PARALLEL PARKING
WALWALL MURAL /
POTPOTPOTPOTENTIAL RETAIL
ON ON FIRST LEVEL,
SHASHARED GARAGE
COUCOURTYRTYARD
SEATING G
NOOKS
OUTDOOR SEATING
POTPOTENTIAL RETAITAIL L
ON FIRST LEVLEVELEL
TWOTWO-WAY ACCESS
ROAROAD AND PARALLEL
FLEXIBLE
GATHERING
SPACE
*EX Site Diagram [//] underlay
UNDERGROUND
CONNECTION
BETWEEN
SECURE PARKING
AND POLICE
DEPARTMENT
SITE ANALYSIS
AL
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
2
C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D
lion tion
Depart.00 15,000 37,000 35,000 98,400
AD & CC 8,000 00
CD 00 4,000 00
3,800 3,800
MC 00 4,500 00
PD 3,800 27,000 30,800
Shared 00 4,400 5,000 00
Support 500 00 17,000 00 20,100
Public 5,000 5,000 10,000
98,400
BASEMENT FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR PAVILION
SECOND
FLOOR
PAVILION
THIRD FLOOR
HISTORIC THIRD
FLOOR
CH
HVAC
STORAGE
PD
LOBBY
RECORDS
CH
SHARED
MEETING
PUBLIC
CAFE
GALLERY
MEETING
PUBLIC
LOBBY
FRONT DESK
CH
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
CH
CMO
OFFICES
PD
BOOKING
EVIDENCE
STORAGE
CH
COMMUNITY
ROOM + COURT
SECOND
FLOOR DOES
NOT CONNECT
TO PAVILION
CH
ADMIN
SERVICES &
BREAK ROOM
PAVILION
ADDITION
PD
PATROL
PD
OFFICES &
TRAINING
ROOM
MC
OFFICES
CH
ADMIN
SERVICES PD
MEETING &
BREAK ROOM
FLOOR
tion
00 37,000 35,000
00
CD 00 00
3,800 3,800
MC 00
PD 3,800 30,800
red 00
500 00 17,000 00 20,100
00
BASEMENT FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR PAVILION
SECOND
FLOOR
PAVILION
THIRD FLOOR
FLOOR
CH
HVAC
STORAGE
PD
LOBBY
RECORDS
CH
SHARED
MEETING
PUBLIC
CAFE
GALLERY
MEETING
PUBLIC
LOBBY
FRONT DESK
CH
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
CH
CMO
OFFICES
PD
BOOKING
EVIDENCE
STORAGE
CH
COMMUNITY
ROOM + COURT
SECOND
FLOOR DOES
NOT CONNECT
TO PAVILION
CH
ADMIN
SERVICES &
BREAK ROOM
PAVILION
ADDITION
PD
PATROL
PD
OFFICES &
TRAINING
ROOM
MC
OFFICES
CH
ADMIN
SERVICES PD
MEETING &
BREAK ROOM
FLOOR
P O
PDCH
Pu
b
l
i
c
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
Po
l
i
c
e
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SECOND FLOOR
COMMUNITY
ROOM + COURT
SECOND
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
PROGRAM MASSING DIAGRAMCOLOR LEGEND
FLOOR PLATE DIAGRAM FOR S REHAB
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
Opportunities & Challenges
COURTYARD
OPPORTUNITIES
• Improved Access and Parking: A new
drive cut along th Avenue enhances
overall site access, and the building’s
northern setback increases the capacity
for angled parking along the frontage.
This coniguration supports a strong
civic identity and improves visibility for
both City Hall and Police Department
entrances. Parking structure allows for
secure parking, sally port and below
grade access to the police department
for secure entry and in-custody transfer.
• Infrastructure and System Eficiency:
Retaining existing parking lots and
utility connections minimizes disruption
to existing storm, water, and sanitary
systems, with only selective relocations
anticipated. The elimination of the
s addition allows for more lexible
structural and programmatic planning
unencumbered by legacy column grids,
and enables more eficient mechanical,
electrical, and plumbing (MEP) routing.
A central courtyard improves access to
daylighting across both historic and new
building areas.
• Optimized Program and Circulation: This
alternative supports a more purpose-
built Police Department layout, with
better control of secure areas and
tailored adjacencies. The separation
between new and historic buildings
allows for distinct public and staff
circulation, with intentional intersections
for key functions like permit processing,
maintaining security while enhancing
transparency and user experience.
• Enhanced Outdoor Areas: The central
courtyard and surrounding green
spaces reduce impervious surfaces,
improve stormwater drainage, and
provide access to views, daylighting, and
informal gathering spaces. Landscaped
areas support wellness, biophilic design
strategies, and future integration with
a potential library or additional civic
functions.
• Sustainable Design Opportunities:
By removing less adaptable legacy
structures, this scheme offers
opportunities to design high-
performance building envelopes and
maximize energy eficiency. Carefully
curated demolition may allow for
salvaging materials like historically
matched brick from the addition,
contributing to waste reduction and
lower embodied carbon.
+
D
R
A
F
T
utility connections minimizes disruption utility connections minimizes disruption
to existing storm, water, and sanitary to existing storm, water, and sanitary
systems, with only selective relocations systems, with only selective relocations
anticipated. The elimination of the anticipated. The elimination of the
s addition allows for more lexible s addition allows for more lexible
structural and programmatic planning structural and programmatic planning
unencumbered by legacy column grids, unencumbered by legacy column grids,
and enables more eficient mechanical, and enables more eficient mechanical,
electrical, and plumbing (MEP) routing. electrical, and plumbing (MEP) routing.
entral courtyard improves access to entral courtyard improves access to
daylighting across both historic and new daylighting across both historic and new
building areas.building areas.D
R
A
F
T
areas support wellness, biophilic design areas support wellness, biophilic design
strategies, and future integration with strategies, and future integration with
otential library or additional civic otential library or additional civic
Sustainable Design Opportunities: Sustainable Design Opportunities:
By removing less adaptable legacy By removing less adaptable legacy
structures, this scheme offers structures, this scheme offers
opportunities to design high-opportunities to design high-
performance building envelopes and performance building envelopes and
maximize energy eficiency. Carefully maximize energy eficiency. Carefully
curated demolition may allow for curated demolition may allow for
FEASIBILITY STUDY
PR
O
S
&
C
O
N
S
CHALLENGES
• Utility and Infrastructure Conlicts: Site
modiications such as the new drive cut
may require relocating a bus stop, ire
hydrant, and electrical infrastructure.
Existing transformers may need
repositioning, introducing added
coordination and potential costs.
• Site Circulation Limitations: The two-
way access road and angled parking may
impact trafic low and limit lexibility,
particularly for service and emergency
vehicles. Unlike the s Rehab
alternative, this scheme does not provide
full vehicular circulation around the
building, which may affect site logistics
and emergency response planning.
• Construction and Demolition Impact:
This alternative involves more extensive
demolition, resulting in increased
construction waste and potential loss of
embodied energy. Additional structural
interventions—such as new supports at
demolished interfaces, added shear walls
or bracing for seismic and snow load
compliance, and roof reinforcement for
the new pavilion—will be required.
• Thermal and System Eficiency
Challenges: The central courtyard
introduces additional building envelope
area, which may increase heating and
cooling loads and complicate MEP
system layouts due to longer runs for
ductwork, piping, and conduit between
the new and historic structures.
• Site Planning and Aesthetic Constraints:
The amphitheater in this option is
smaller than in the s Rehab scheme
and is oriented toward a utility area and
southern access road, which may detract
from its public appeal. These placements
may also impact the development
density and desirability of adjacent
multifamily housing on the south end of
the site.
D
R
A
F
T
particularly for service and emergency particularly for service and emergency
alternative, this scheme does not provide alternative, this scheme does not provide
full vehicular circulation around the full vehicular circulation around the
building, which may affect site logistics building, which may affect site logistics
and emergency response planning.and emergency response planning.
Construction and Demolition Impact: Construction and Demolition Impact:
This alternative involves more extensive This alternative involves more extensive
demolition, resulting in increased demolition, resulting in increased
construction waste and potential loss of construction waste and potential loss of
embodied energy. Additional structural embodied energy. Additional structural
interventions—such as new supports at interventions—such as new supports at
demolished interfaces, added shear walls demolished interfaces, added shear walls
or bracing for seismic and snow load or bracing for seismic and snow load D
R
A
F
T
from its public appeal. These placements from its public appeal. These placements
may also impact the development may also impact the development
density and desirability of adjacent density and desirability of adjacent
multifamily housing on the south end of multifamily housing on the south end of
the site.the site.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
ROM Cost Estimate
To support early decision-making and compare the feasibility of the two alternatives,
a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate has been developed as part of this
study. This estimate provides a high-level view of projected construction costs for both
the s Rehab and Courtyard alternatives. It includes broad cost assu mptions, built-in
contingencies, and allowances to account for the preliminary nature of the design and
unknown conditions typical at this stage.
While not intended as a detailed or inal budget, the ROM estimate is a valuabl e tool
for evaluating the relative cost implications of each approach and understanding the
potential scope of investment required. It highlights key differences in demolition, new
construction, rehabilitation efforts, and systems upgrades, giving the City and project
stakeholders a baseline for ongoing discussions and planning. As the project progresses
and the design is further developed, this estimate will be reined throug h more detailed
quantity takeoffs, updated unit costs, and alignment with market conditions.
ALTERNATIVE :
COURTYARD
ALTERNATIVE :
S REHAB
FEASIBILITY STUDY
RO
M
C
O
S
T
E
S
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Page 1WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
SCENARIO 1
M A S T E R S U M M A R Y
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION COST/SF TOTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
29.07 $5,813,508
RENOVATION (1921 & 1932)26,400
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 725.19 $19,144,930
PAVILLION & ADDITION 76,000 SF 658.80 $50,068,827
PARKING GARAGE 50,000 SF 137.13 $6,856,313
TOTAL (Construction)
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$81,883,577
NOTES:D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Page 2WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION QUANTITY UNIT COST/SF TOTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Site Clearing, Demo & Prep 200,000 SF 2.50
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$500,000
Site Earthwork & Grading, Allow 200,000 SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
1.50
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$300,000
Site Asphalt Paving w/ Base & Curbs 67,800
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$440,700
Site Vehicle Concrete Paving w/ Base (Colored)26,100
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$261,000
Site Pedestrian Concrete Paving w/ Base (Colored)56,100
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
10.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$561,000
Site Plaza Concrete Paving w/ Base (Colored)
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
18.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$275,400
Site Landscaping Beds & Irrigation
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8.00 $387,200
Site Landscaping Lawn & Irrigation
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
3.00 $243,300
Site Furnishings, Allow
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
LS 150,000 $150,000
Site Striping & Signage, Allow 1 LS 35,000 $35,000
Site Utilities, Allow 1 LS 300,000 $300,000
Site Lighting, Allow 1 LS 150,000 $150,000
18.02 $3,603,600
SUB-TOTAL 200,000 SF 18.02 $3,603,600
CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONDITIONSD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
9.0%1.62 $324,324
CONTRACTOR BOND & INSURANCED
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.5%0.45 $90,090
CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD & PROFITD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8.0%1.44 $288,288
SUB-TOTAL 200,000 SF 21.53 $4,306,302
INFLATION TO SPRING 2027, ALLOW 10.0%2.15 $430,630
DESIGN / MARKET CONTINGENCY, ALLOW 25.0%5.38 $1,076,576
TOTAL (Construction)200,000 SF 29.07 $5,813,508
NOTES:Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
FEASIBILITY STUDY
RO
M
C
O
S
T
E
S
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Page 3WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
RENOVATION (1921 & 1932)
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION QUANTITY UNIT COST/SF TOTAL
RENOVATION (1921 & 1932)
Selective Demolition
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
9.00 $237,600
Hazardous Material Abatement, Allow
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
25.00 $660,000
Structural Bracing / Modifications
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
18.00 $475,200
Historic Brick / Stone Restoration
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 65.00 $975,000
Historic Window Restoration 2,500
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 200.00 $500,000
Architectural 26,400
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 165.00 $4,356,000
Fire Suppression 26,400 SF 7.50 $198,000
Plumbing 26,400 SF 16.00 $422,400
Mechanical 26,400 SF 70.00 $1,848,000
Electrical 26,400 SF 58.00 $1,531,200
424.37 $11,203,400
SUB-TOTALD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
26,400 SF 424.37 $11,203,400
CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONDITIONSD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
9.0%38.19 $1,008,306
CONTRACTOR BOND & INSURANCED
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.5%10.61 $280,085
CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD & PROFITD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8.0%33.95 $896,272
SUB-TOTALD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
26,400 SF 507.12 $13,388,063
INFLATION TO SPRING 2027, ALLOW 10.0%50.71 $1,338,806
HISTORIC PRESERVATION FACTOR, ALLOW 8.0%40.57 $1,071,045
DESIGN / MARKET CONTINGENCY, ALLOW 25.0%126.78 $3,347,016
TOTAL (Construction)26,400 SF 725.19 $19,144,930
NOTES:Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Page 4WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
PAVILLION & ADDITION
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION QUANTITY UNIT COST/SF TOTAL
PAVILLION & ADDITION
Earthwork (Building Related)21,000 SF 8.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$168,000
S.O.G. / Foundations / Basement Walls 21,000 SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
30.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$630,000
Structure 55,000
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$1,925,000
Architectural 76,000
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$15,960,000
Stairs w/ Railings
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
27,500
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$165,000
Passenger Elevator - 3 Stop
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
150,000
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$450,000
Rooftop Patio
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
32.00 $224,000
Fire Suppression
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
7.50 $570,000
Plumbing 76,000
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 16.00 $1,216,000
Mechanical 76,000
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 70.00 $5,320,000
Electrical 76,000 SF 58.00 $4,408,000
408.37 $31,036,000
SUB-TOTAL 76,000 SF 408.37 $31,036,000
CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONDITIONSD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
9.0%36.75 $2,793,240
CONTRACTOR BOND & INSURANCED
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.5%10.21 $775,900
CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD & PROFITD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8.0%32.67 $2,482,880
SUB-TOTAL 76,000 SF 488.00 $37,088,020
INFLATION TO SPRING 2027, ALLOW 10.0%48.80 $3,708,802
DESIGN / MARKET CONTINGENCY, ALLOW 25.0%122.00 $9,272,005
TOTAL (Construction)76,000 SF 658.80 $50,068,827
NOTES:Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
FEASIBILITY STUDY
RO
M
C
O
S
T
E
S
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Page 5WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
PARKING GARAGE
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION QUANTITY UNIT COST/SF TOTAL
PARKING GARAGE
2-Story Parking Garage, Partially Underground
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
85.00 $4,250,000
(Screen Wall Not Included)85.00 $4,250,000
SUB-TOTAL 50,000 SF 85.00 $4,250,000
CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONDITIONS
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
9.0%7.65 $382,500
CONTRACTOR BOND & INSURANCE
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.5%2.13 $106,250
CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD & PROFIT
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8.0%6.80 $340,000
SUB-TOTAL 50,000 SF 101.58 $5,078,750
INFLATION TO SPRING 2027, ALLOW
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
10.0%10.16 $507,875
DESIGN / MARKET CONTINGENCY, ALLOWD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
25.0%25.39 $1,269,688
TOTAL (Construction)D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
50,000 SF 137.13 $6,856,313
NOTES:D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Page 1WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
SCENARIO 2
M A S T E R S U M M A R Y
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION COST/SF TOTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS 200,000 SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
27.60
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$5,519,896
RENOVATION (1921, 1932 & 1960)46,700
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
705.27
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$32,936,289
PAVILLION & ADDITION
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
658.80 $50,068,827
PARKING GARAGE 50,000
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 137.13 $6,856,313
TOTAL (Construction)$95,381,325
NOTES:Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
FEASIBILITY STUDY
RO
M
C
O
S
T
E
S
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Page 2WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION QUANTITY UNIT COST/SF TOTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Site Clearing, Demo & Prep
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.50 $500,000
Site Earthwork & Grading, Allow
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
1.50 $300,000
Site Asphalt Paving w/ Base & Curbs
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
6.50 $440,700
Site Vehicle Concrete Paving w/ Base (Colored)
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
10.00 $261,000
Site Pedestrian Concrete Paving w/ Base (Colored)
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
49,600
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 10.00 $496,000
Site Plaza Concrete Paving w/ Base (Colored)
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8,800
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 18.00 $158,400
Site Landscaping Beds & Irrigation 48,400 SF 8.00 $387,200
Site Landscaping Lawn & Irrigation 81,100 SF 3.00 $243,300
Site Furnishings, Allow 1 LS 150,000 $150,000
Site Striping & Signage, Allow
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
1 LS 35,000 $35,000
Site Utilities, Allow 1 LS 300,000 $300,000
Site Lighting, Allow 1 LS 150,000 $150,000
17.11 $3,421,600
SUB-TOTALD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
200,000 SF 17.11 $3,421,600
CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONDITIONSD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
9.0%1.54 $307,944
CONTRACTOR BOND & INSURANCED
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.5%0.43 $85,540
CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD & PROFITD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8.0%1.37 $273,728
SUB-TOTAL 200,000 SF 20.44 $4,088,812
INFLATION TO SPRING 2027, ALLOW 10.0%2.04 $408,881
DESIGN / MARKET CONTINGENCY, ALLOW 25.0%5.11 $1,022,203
TOTAL (Construction)200,000 SF 27.60 $5,519,896
NOTES:Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Page 3WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
RENOVATION (1921, 1932 & 1960)
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION QUANTITY UNIT COST/SF TOTAL
RENOVATION (1921 & 1932)
Selective Demolition 46,700 SF 9.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$420,300
Hazardous Material Abatement, Allow 46,700 SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
25.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$1,167,500
Structural Bracing / Modifications 46,700
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$840,600
Historic Brick / Stone Restoration 21,000
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$1,365,000
Historic Window Restoration
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
200.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$700,000
Architectural
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
165.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$7,705,500
Fire Suppression
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
7.50 $350,250
Plumbing
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
16.00 $747,200
Mechanical 46,700
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 70.00 $3,269,000
Electrical 46,700
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 58.00 $2,708,600
412.72 $19,273,950
SUB-TOTAL 46,700 SF 412.72 $19,273,950
CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONDITIONSD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
9.0%37.14 $1,734,656
CONTRACTOR BOND & INSURANCED
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.5%10.32 $481,849
CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD & PROFITD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8.0%33.02 $1,541,916
SUB-TOTAL D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
46,700 SF 493.20 $23,032,370
INFLATION TO SPRING 2027, ALLOWD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
10.0%49.32 $2,303,237
HISTORIC PRESERVATION FACTOR, ALLOW 8.0%39.46 $1,842,590
DESIGN / MARKET CONTINGENCY, ALLOW 25.0%123.30 $5,758,093
TOTAL (Construction)46,700 SF 705.27 $32,936,289
NOTES:Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
FEASIBILITY STUDY
RO
M
C
O
S
T
E
S
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Page 4WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
PAVILLION & ADDITION
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION QUANTITY UNIT COST/SF TOTAL
PAVILLION & ADDITION
Earthwork (Building Related)
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8.00 $168,000
S.O.G. / Foundations / Basement Walls
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
30.00 $630,000
Structure
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
35.00 $1,925,000
Architectural
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
SF 210.00 $15,960,000
Stairs w/ Railings 6 FLT 27,500 $165,000
Passenger Elevator - 3 Stop 3 EA 150,000 $450,000
Rooftop Patio 7,000 SF 32.00 $224,000
Fire Suppression 76,000 SF 7.50 $570,000
Plumbing 76,000 SF 16.00 $1,216,000
Mechanical 76,000 SF 70.00 $5,320,000
Electrical 76,000 SF 58.00 $4,408,000
408.37 $31,036,000
SUB-TOTALD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
76,000 SF 408.37 $31,036,000
CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONDITIONSD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
9.0%36.75 $2,793,240
CONTRACTOR BOND & INSURANCED
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.5%10.21 $775,900
CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD & PROFITD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
8.0%32.67 $2,482,880
SUB-TOTALD
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
76,000 SF 488.00 $37,088,020
INFLATION TO SPRING 2027, ALLOW 10.0%48.80 $3,708,802
DESIGN / MARKET CONTINGENCY, ALLOW 25.0%122.00 $9,272,005
TOTAL (Construction)76,000 SF 658.80 $50,068,827
NOTES:Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Page 5WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - LUTHERAN CAMPUS
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CIVIC CAMPUS
PARKING GARAGE
Conceptual Design ROM - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
May 15, 2025
SECTION QUANTITY UNIT COST/SF TOTAL
PARKING GARAGE
2-Story Parking Garage, Partially Underground 50,000 SF 85.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$4,250,000
(Screen Wall Not Included)85.00
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
$4,250,000
SUB-TOTAL
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
85.00 $4,250,000
CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONDITIONS
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
7.65 $382,500
CONTRACTOR BOND & INSURANCE
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
2.13 $106,250
CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD & PROFIT
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
6.80 $340,000
SUB-TOTAL 50,000 SF 101.58 $5,078,750
INFLATION TO SPRING 2027, ALLOW
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
10.0%10.16 $507,875
DESIGN / MARKET CONTINGENCY, ALLOW
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
25.0%25.39 $1,269,688
TOTAL (Construction)D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
50,000 SF 137.13 $6,856,313
NOTES:Costs are for Construction Only and do Not Include Soft Costs or Contractor / Owner Contingency.D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Costs are based on a Traditional Open Competitive Bid Basis Receiving Multiple Favorable Bids.D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Costs are based on a Construction Start of Spring 2027.
For Inflation Beyond Spring 2027, Add 5% per Year Compounded.
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Parametrix, Inc. (801) 733-5900
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
Project Phasing
TIMELINE
The phasing of this project presents unique challenges due to the careful balance
required between demolition, historic preservation, and new construction. The removal
of surrounding elements of the Lutheran Legacy Campus must be executed with
precision—particularly in areas adjacent to the historic and structures. This
delicate demolition may involve multiple contractors and must account for time-
sensitive requirements related to protecting, structurally stabilizing, and conditioning
the remaining historic elements between demolition and the start of new construction.
This transitional period will require a highly coordinated effort to balance hazardous
material remediation, structural shoring, and the nuanced rehabilitation of historic
materials. If a future library is introduced along the eastern edge of the re-imagined
pavilion, additional coordination will be necessary to align its footprint, interface, and
phasing with the new civic buildings—whether as an integrated expansion or a phased
addition. These considerations will be critical to maintaining design continuity and long-
term campus cohesion.
Sustainability is also a key consideration in the phasing strategy. For example, the
addition’s brick—originally selected to match the historic masonry—may be salvaged
and reused in the new buildings to reduce demolition waste and embodied carbon. The
design team will continue to explore opportunities for material reuse that align with
current codes and performance standards. An initial phasing timeline is included in this
report as a starting point for discussion, and the team looks forward to collaborating
closely with Ex and the City to reine this schedule as the project advances a nd design
details are further developed.
SITE ANALYSIS
LU
T
H
E
R
A
N
C
A
M
P
U
S
P
H
A
S
I
N
G
T
I
M
E
L
I
N
E
Lutheran Campus Phasing Timeline
Recommended project timeline
D
R
A
F
T
Q1 Q2Q1 Q2Q1 Q2Q1 Q2
YEAR 1 YEAR 2
3 MONTHSQ1 Q2Q1 Q2 Q33 MONTHS Q43 MONTHS 3 MONTHS
Responsibility: E5X
Hazmat mitigation of all structures planned
for demolition outside of City Hall scope.
Time: 3 Months
Responsibility: City of Wheat Ridge
Design and creation of contract documents.
Permitting and Bidding.
Time: Design 12 Months, Permitting 3 Months
PROJECT START:
HAZMAT ABATEMENT
Responsibility: E5X
Demolition of all structures
outside of City Hall scope.
Time: 6 Months
DEMOLITION:
ADJACENT STRUCTURES
Responsibility: TBD
Construction of adjacent
parking garage.
Time: 8 Months
CONSTRUCTION: NEW PARKING GARAGE
• COMMUNITY PLAZA
• LIBRARY ADDITION
• CHAPEL & BLUE HOUSE
RENOVATIONS
Responsibility: City of Wheat Ridge
Historic building abatement & Demolition.
Renovation of interior spaces.
Time: 16 Months
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
DEMOLITION & RENOVATION: HISTORIC BUILDING INTERIOR
D
R
A
F
T
D
R
A
F
T
Responsibility: City of Wheat Ridge
New building construction including
surrounding site work.
Time: 20 MonthsD
R
A
F
T
CONSTRUCTION: NEW PAVILION & JUSTIC CENTER ADDITIOND
R
A
F
T
PROJECT DESIGN PHASE: SCHEMATIC DESIGN THROUGH
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
LEGEND:
City of Wheat Ridge
E5X / DEVELOPER
TO BE DETERMINED
Q1 Q2Q1 Q2Q1 Q2Q1 Q2
YEAR 3
3 MONTHSQ1 Q2Q1 Q2 Q33 MONTHS 3 MONTHSQ1 Q2Q1 Q2Q1 Q2Q1 Q2
3 MONTHSQ1 Q2Q1 Q2 Q33 MONTHS Q43 MONTHS 3 MONTHS
+
LUTHERAN LEGACY CAMPUS:
FEASIBILITY STUDY DRAFT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The development of Lutheran Campus
Options for Consideration
Tower + Addition
Option Cover Page
Historic Wing
Addition
Addition Floor Plans
New Building
1921
1932
1960
1967
1970
1972
1984
1984
1984
1990s
1985
1988
1991
1992
2002
2008
Current Condition
Potential Options:
. Tower + Entrance Addition
. Historic Wing & s
. Addition
. New Building
Lutheran Campus City of Wheat Ridge Use
+
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS DRAFT
1. Tower + Entrance Addition
1.
T
O
W
E
R
+
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
T
O
W
E
R
+
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
PROS
• Open loor plans
• Views from upper loors
• Room for growth
• Newer construction
• Faces th
• Multiple options for entry points
• Aligns with EX plan
CONS
• Large bay depth minimizes daylighting potential
• Limited windows
• Large area of irst loors limits usability of interior
• More space than needed = Relying on other tenants to ill other
loors
• Interior reconiguration needed other than th and th loors
• Likely need a new entry addition
• Security concern of sharing building with other tenants
• Concern with creating clear wayinding to City Services (due to
other tenants)
• PD activity within residential development
• Trafic low in and out of campus & sally port
• Utilities for maintaining, heating, cooling for building would be
extensive
Option A: First & Second Floors
Option B: Upper Tower Floors
*All numbers are Square footages
SF
Dash indicates potential
locations for a new
entrance addition
EX Overlay
Legend
CH City Hall
MC Municipal Courts
PD Police Department
+
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS DRAFT
2.
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
W
I
N
G
&
1
9
6
0
S
2. Historic Wing & 1960s
PROS
• Preserves the most historic fabric
• Faces th Ave
• Potential for welcoming entry plaza facing th (civic presence)
• Ideal bay depth for daylighting
• Potential for skylights/ overhead daylighting due to less loor level s
• Fit all city functions in building
• Potential for tower to be reused for other uses
• No reliance on other tenants, more secure and stable
CONS
• Would need to re-skin a large portion of the building
• Interior reconiguration needed
• Doesn’t align as well with EX plan
• Heating and Ventilation
• Upgrade for insulation
Potential Site Layout
Dash indicates potential
new civic plaza and
entrance
Legend
CH City Hall
MC Municipal Courts
PD Police Department
*All numbers are Square footages
+
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS DRAFT
2.
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
R
E
I
M
A
G
I
N
E
D
O
P
T
I
O
N
S
2. Historic Re-imagined Options
Wing A - + s Wing B - + s + Pavilion + Colonnade
Alt Program Examples:
• Library
• Police Department & Municipal Courts
• Non-proit Ofices
• Retail
Legend:
Pavilion
Outdoor Space
Wing C - + Pavilion + Colonnade
Potential Site Layout
+
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS DRAFT
3.
1
9
8
4
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
:
3. 1984 Addition:
PROS
• Fit all city functions in building including Police &
Courts
• No reliance on other tenants
• Room for growth
• Ideal bay depth for daylighting
• Large windows
• Good window cadence for interior layout
• Views from upper loors
• Potential for separated entry points (Police/ City
Hall)
• Upper loor for mechanical systems and basement
for storage
• Potential for tower to be reused for other
uses
• Saves a signiicant amount of embodied carbon
• Building has an existing “Civic” aesthetic
CONS
• Doesn’t face th
• Likely want to re-skin portions of the building
• Interior reconiguration needed
• Doesn’t save historic portions of the original
Sanitarium
• Doesn’t align as well with EX plan
• Upgrade for insulation
st: , sf
nd: , sf
rd: , sf
st: , sf
nd: , sf
rd: , sf
th: , sf
th: , sf
th: , sf
st: , sf
nd: OTB sf
rd: , sf
th: , sf
21
1&2 1&3 1,2,&3
3
View Angle for
Blow-up Below
() Alternatives Based on () Building Portions
Potential Site Layout
+
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS DRAFT
3.
1
9
8
4
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
:
Buildings , , & Floor Plans
Legend
CH City Hall
MC Municipal Courts
PD Police Department
Dash indicates areas of
program that does not
need daylighting
(storage, locker rooms,
etc.)
1&2 1&3 1,2,&3
CH, sf
, sf
, sf
, sf
,
s
f
PD/MC
CH
PD/MC
CH
1st
1st 1st
2nd
2nd 2nd
3rd
3rd
3rd4th
4-6th
4-6th
3. 1984 Addition:
+
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS DRAFT
4.
N
E
W
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
4. New Building
PROS
• Designed speciic to City needs
• Can face th Ave
• Potential for welcoming entry plaza facing th
(civic presence)
• Potential for tower to be reused for other
uses
• Can align well with EX plan
• Increased building performance (Installation,
materials, insulation, systems (PV, etc.)
CONS
• Highest amount of landill waste and embodied
carbon loss
• Likely highest cost
• Likely longer schedule to completion/ need for
phasing
Potential Building Location
New building opportunity are endless for location
within EX site plan. Group focused on having th
presence. New building could be constructed next to
the building, in place of the building, and/
or historic portions of Lutheran Campus could be
retained etc.
() Highlighted Options:
A: City Hall functions move to New Building on Lutheran Campus, Police
Department and Municipal Courts stays at current City Hall
B: City Hall, Police Department, & Municipal Courts move to New Building o n
Lutheran Campus
Potential Site Layout
WHEAT RIDGE FACILITY SITE REPORT
January 3, 2025
P a g e 1 | 3
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Introduction
The following narrative is provided as documentation of the existing site and utility infrastructure at the
previously used Lutheran Legacy Campus site located at 8300 West 38th Ave in the City of Wheat Ridge,
Colorado.
General Site Description
The Lutheran Legacy Campus site is located at 8300 West 38th Avenue. The campus extends between West
32nd Avenue and West 38th Avenue, bordered by Allsion Street to the east and Dudley Street to the west. The
Lutheran Campus is approximately 100 acres in size and is surrounded primarily by single family residential
homes. It is understood that 38th Avenue is owned and maintained by the City of Wheat Ridge.
Primary access to the campus is from West 38th Avenue to the north of the site and via North Lutheran
Parkway on the east side of the campus building. There is additional campus access off 38th Avenue to the
west of the campus via Lutheran Parkway West. The campus can also be accessed from the south via West
32nd Avenue via North Lutheran Parkway.
The site includes three large asphalt parking lots on the eastern side of the campus. There is a drop off lane
located on the east side at the main entrance to the building. In addition, there is an additional smaller lot
located on the north side of the building along West 38th Avenue. This parking and drive lane provides access
to the previously used emergency entrance. Drive access continues around to the west side of the building
with limited parking available for campus facilities. There are multiple concrete sidewalks and pedestrian
pathways to direct pedestrians from the parking lots to the main building. There is a multiuse path to the
south of the building that runs along the Rocky Mountain Ditch connecting Lutheran Parkway West and North
Lutheran Parkway. The buildings range from one to six floors in height. The larger main building is understood
to have had multiple additions and renovations over the years, while still maintaining historical structures
such as the Blue House and Chapel.
The site is bifurcated into a northern and southern section by the Rocky Mountain Ditch that is owned and
operated by Rocky Mountain Water Company. The Ditch runs through the middle of the site from the
northwest to the southeast edge. For this report, the focus of the site observation will be the parcel of land
to the north of the Rocky Mountain Ditch.
WHEAT RIDGE FACILITY SITE REPORT
January 3, 2025
P a g e 2 | 3
Figure X. Lutheran Legacy Campus Layout
Recorded Surveys
The site is located within Section 26, Township 3, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Jefferson
County, Colorado. The parcel identification number is 39-262-00-045 and the site is currently zoned PHD
(Planned Hospital Development). A recordation number of the Subdivision Plat was not available at the time
of this report.
Soil Data
The site is made up primarily of hydrologic soil types C and D as reported by National Cooperative Soil
Survey by the USDA and NRCS.
Flood Zone Data
The site is situated in within Zone “X”, an area determined to be outside the 2% annual chance floodplain as
indicated on FEMA Flood Rate Map 08059C0214G, dated August 2, 2022, and is located outside of the 100-
year floodplain.
WHEAT RIDGE FACILITY SITE REPORT
January 3, 2025
P a g e 3 | 3
Site Topography and Drainage Patterns
The main hospital building is situated at the base of a hillside that slopes up in a southwesterly direction.
Onsite drainage sheet flows across the parking lots until it is channelized within concrete pans or curb and
gutter. Onsite flows are then directed into inlets that connect to the overall stormwater collection system.
There are two small ponds located in the southwest corner of the site near the Rocky Mountain Ditch. It is
understood that these ponds may be used for irrigation throughout the campus. The campus has a
topographic relief on the order of approximately 30 feet from south to north.
The ditch and Lutheran Parkway West are located at the high end of the site with a rapid decent to the
southern and western sides of the building and parking lots. The remaining approximate 20 feet of fall occurs
gradually across the site with the intersection of West 38th Avenue and North Lutheran Parkway located near
the northeastern portion of the site being the lowest area. The site is comprised of grass lawns around the
historic building and parking lots with larger trees and vegetation located near the ditch.
Rocky Mountain Ditch is a significant physical constraint on the campus. Any adjustment to the ditch will need
to be coordinated with the ditch provider.
Existing Utility Systems
Water Distribution System
The existing water distribution system is owned and maintained by Wheat Ridge Water District. There are
public mains located on all four sides of the campus within West 38th Avenue, 32nd Avenue, 35th Avenue, and
Dudley Street with private connections on campus. The size and material of the private mains are unknown
at the time of this report.
Wastewater Collection System
The Wheat Ridge Sanitation District maintains the wastewater collection system. There is an existing 8-inch
public main located in West 38th Avenue that services the campus site. There are private sanitary mains on
the campus to the east and west of the building. The size and material of the private mains are unknown at
the time of this report.
Electrical, Gas and Communication Systems
Existing electrical distribution and communications lines exist in and around the campus. Xcel Energy
provide the electrical and gas services. CenturyLink provides telecommunications to the site.
Study Area/Site Boundaries
• North of the Rocky Mountain Ditch and south of W. 38th Avenue. West boundary is Lutheran Parkway
W. and east boundary is N. Lutheran Parkway and the parking immediately east of the parkway. Refer to
the civil narrative for additional site description.
Demolition
• Select building demolition is slated for Fall 2025.
• Site walls and retaining walls should be reviewed for structural integrity.
Figure XX – Existing chapel to remain and be re-purposed.
Topography & Vegetation
• Generally, the site is lower in elevation in relation to W. 38th Ave to the north and the Rocky Mountain
Ditch to the south.
• The Rocky Mountain Ditch creates the southern site boundary for the project. Coordination with the
ditch provider will be needed and it is understood that the ditch will likely be piped. There is an
opportunity to enhance open space and multi-modal connectivity at the ditch.
• Mature tree canopy is primarily along the Rocky Mountain Ditch, onsite detention ponds and W. 38th
Avenue.
o Data need: Tree study understood to be underway by the developer.
• Irrigation is through surface water and possibly from the onsite detention ponds.
• Throughout the site, there are opportunities to create networks of open spaces, pocket parks or
courtyards, etc. Pending building concepts, an outdoor amphitheater/seating area or space for seasonal
outdoor markets could be created for city functions.
Figure XX – Mature vegetation and degraded asphalt walks at the ditch.
Vehicular, Transit, and Bicycle Circulation
• Access to the site is either from the north or south along North Lutheran Parkway and Lutheran Parkway
West. Numerous parking lots exist throughout the site. It is understood that a future stop light may be
constructed at the intersection of W. 38th Ave. and Lutheran Parkway W.
• There is a bus stop at W. 38th Ave between North Lutheran Parkway and Lutheran Parkway West.
• There is an opportunity on W. 38th Ave. to enhance the road corridor and create nodes or a gateway for
the Wheat Ridge community.
• Designated bicycle routes within the project boundary were not observed. There is an opportunity to
create a route within the site boundary.
• Multiple sidewalks connections exist throughout the site. They are primarily concrete, range in width
and are both attached and detached. Walks could be maintained and enhanced as part of the
pedestrian or multi-modal circulation network. There are also opportunities to protect and re-utilize
existing courtyards and gathering areas.
Figure XX – Example of existing parking lot. Striping is faded. Site lighting within rock mulch landscape islands.
Figure XX – Opportunity for outdoor gathering space at the Blue House
Figure XX – Existing courtyard/contemplative space.
• There are deteriorated asphalt walking paths adjacent to the Rocky Mountain Ditch. Walk accessibility
was not reviewed as part of the scope of this project, however, the ditch walk generally does not comply
with current ADA code requirements due to deterioration, cracks, select longitudinal slopes, and gaps.
o Data need: GIS data or 1’-0” topographic survey information from the 2021 Lutheran Legacy
Campus Masterplan. It is also understood that the developer will be providing a utility survey.
Signage and Site Amenities
• Existing art sculptures are understood to be removed prior to demolition and will not be re-installed on-
site.
• Historic elements and portions of the building character could be incorporated into the immediate site
amenities (plaza, courtyard, site amenities, etc.), along streetscapes (signage, lighting, wayfinding, etc.),
and potentially throughout the City.
Figure XX – Clock tower, plaza and drop off
Figure XX – Architectural detailing
Figure XX – Example of existing art sculpture
Three Sixty Engineering, Inc 1600 Jackson Street, Suite 360, Golden, CO 80401 303.940.2050 www.360eng.com
•
o
o
o
o
•
o
o
o
o
•
o
o
o
o
Three Sixty Engineering, Inc 1600 Jackson Street, Suite 360, Golden, CO 80401 303.940.2050 www.360eng.com
•
o
▪
Three Sixty Engineering, Inc 1600 Jackson Street, Suite 360, Golden, CO 80401 303.940.2050 www.360eng.com
o
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
o
▪
▪
▪
▪
o
▪
Three Sixty Engineering, Inc 1600 Jackson Street, Suite 360, Golden, CO 80401 303.940.2050 www.360eng.com
▪
•
o
o
▪
▪
o
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
o
▪
▪
Three Sixty Engineering, Inc 1600 Jackson Street, Suite 360, Golden, CO 80401 303.940.2050 www.360eng.com
•
o
▪
▪
o
▪
▪
o
▪
o
▪
•
o
▪
o
▪
o
▪
aedesign-inc.com | 1900 Wazee Street #205 | Denver, CO 80202 | 303.296.3034
OBSERVATION
REPORT
To
Anderson Hallas
1317 Washington Avenue
Golden, CO 80401
Attn Rachel Koleski Project Name Wheat Ridge Feasibility
CC Project # 6871.00
From Brian Johnson Observation Date 12/19/2024
On Site
Contact Time In 12:00 pm
Time Out 4:00 pm
Represented
Companies
AE Design, Anderson Hallas,
360 Engineering, JVA
Issue Date 1/3/2025
Site Visit # #01
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
# COMMENT
G1 Summary of Findings:
1. The campus is fed from two redundant Xcel Energy feeds: one from Arvada and one from
Lakewood.
a. Power comes in at 13.2kV.
2. Summary of Electrical Distribution
a. Incoming power from Xcel feeds a primary switchgear located at the Boiler Plant. This
switchgear includes seven sections: two incoming power bays, one metering section,
and four sections serving step-down utility transformers to 277/480V 3-Phase power.
i. 2500kVA Transformer #2 feeds Distribution Panel ‘D2’ serving the Emergency
Room and Operating Room distribution.
ii. 3000kVA Transformer #3 feeds a transition board that serves Distribution
Panel ‘D1’ and I.T.E. Distribution Switchgear ‘D1’.
iii. 2500kVA Transformer #1 feeds I.T.E. Distribution Switchgear ‘D1’
iv. 3000kVA Transformer #4 feeds the 4000A ‘MSG-NP’ at the North Pavilion.
3. The campus electrical design includes the following generators:
a. (1) 2MW Generator #1 feeding Generator Distribution & Control Center ‘GDCC’.
b. (1) 750kW Generator #4 feeding Chiller Plant ATS.
c. (1) 750kW Generator #2 feeding Generator Distribution & Control Center ‘GDCC’.
d. (1) 1250kW Generator #3 feeding Generator Distribution & Control Center ‘GDCC’.
e. All generators operate at 480V-3Ph.
f. All generators utilize diesel fuel from (2) 10,000 gal tanks underground.
4. The hospital building contains (2) fire pumps, one for the north and one for the south.
5. Construction History
a. Observed various phases from 1932, 1960, 1970, 1984, 1992 and 2008.
b. Particular attention was paid to the 2008 North Pavilion and Tower, which are
anticipated to remain under this conceptual plan. Note that the North Pavilion is fed
from Transformer #4, and much of the existing infrastructure may be available for
reuse.
i. Levels 4 and 5 are still in a Core & Shell state. Refer to Specific Observations
for a summary of existing conditions on these levels.
G2 Opportunities:
1. The City has indicated plans to demolish the entire Boiler Plant. There is a tremendous amount
of power allocated to the campus through the three utility transformers located at the Boiler
Integrated Lighting, Technology, & Electrical Solutions | Project Name | Page 2
OBSERVATION
REPORT
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
Plant (transformer #1, #2 and #3), and it is anticipated that these transformers and the
equipment they serve could be demolished.
2. Much of the North Pavilion is planned for reuse, and Transformer #4 (exact location unknown)
could be fed from a new primary line to continue serving the existing 4000A North Pavilion
service.
3. Some or all of the existing generators could be reused across the campus, depending on the
needs.
4. The North Pavilion contains some existing equipment that could be reused, including
panelboards, transformers, light fixtures, fire alarm devices, and electrical outlets. However,
the majority of the space would need to be redesigned downstream of the main service to
meet the new building needs and current code cycles.
G3 Challenges:
1. The City is concerned about maintenance requirements and would prefer to keep it simple.
The existing campus distribution is complex, and even reusing a portion of the distribution for
the North Pavilion would require some rework and simplification.
2. If any of the generators are reused, it will require redesign of enclosures, fuel storage,
connections to the building service(s), etc.
3. The utility building (boiler plant) with the incoming power from Xcel is sitting on the location
where a future apartment complex is proposed. It is likely the campus infrastructure will need
to be reworked or demolished and all existing primary infrastructure relocated.
4. The existing campus is on a single utility meter at the primary switchgear. Any new
infrastructure and buildings would require new utility metering.
SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS
# LOCATION COMMENT PHOTO #
1 Utility
Building Exterior 2MW generator 1
2 Utility
Building Underground diesel fuel tanks 2
3
Tower 08
Levels 4 and 5 are in a Core & Shell state. Existing construction includes
fluorescent stumble lighting, exposed conduit and cabling, a combination of
toggle switch and occupancy sensor lighting controls, fire alarm devices, and
electrical panels that appear to be in good condition.
3
4 Tower 08 Existing fluorescent stumble lighting to be replaced with new LED lighting. 4
5 Tower 08 Existing fire alarm system may be fit for reuse; new notification devices to
be added as needed. 5
6 Tower 08 Existing electrical panels are in good condition. 6
7 Tower 08 Existing circuit breakers are in good condition. 7
8 Hospital
Lobby
Some lighting may be available for reuse; lighting controls would require
update for IECC code compliance. 8
Integrated Lighting, Technology, & Electrical Solutions | Project Name | Page 3
OBSERVATION
REPORT
Photo #1: 2MW Generator Photo #2: Diesel Fuel Tanks
Photo #3: Tower 08 Level 4 and 5 Photo #4: Fluorescent lighting
Integrated Lighting, Technology, & Electrical Solutions | Project Name | Page 4
OBSERVATION
REPORT
Photo #5: Fire Alarm Device Photo #6: Electrical Panel
Photo #7: Circuit Breakers Photo #8: Hospital Lobby Lighting Controls
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LUTHERAN CAMPUS
+
D
R
A
F
T
ank you!
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patrick Goff, City Manager
Kent Kisselman, Interim Public Works Director
Dan Beiers, Interim Facilities and Fleet Manager
DATE: June 16, 2025
SUBJECT: Property Acquisition for Public Works and Parks Shops
ISSUE:
During the 2022 budget process, City Council asked staff to prepare a Facilities Master
Plan (FMP) to assess the current and future needs of City facilities. The City contracted with Stantec to develop a comprehensive FMP for all primary City functions, with the
goal of developing a roadmap and living documents for facility decisions over the next
decade. City Council consensus was reached at the February 5, 2024, study session to
move forward with the recommendations of the FMP and to bring back next steps.
One recommendation from the FMP is to co-locate and expand the Public Works and
Parks Shops at one site. The recommended direction is to acquire a parcel(s) directly
south of the existing Public Works Shop space, off 44th Avenue, to make this expansion
possible. The City was contacted by a broker representing the property owner of 11221
W. 44th Avenue to determine if the City would be interested in purchasing the property. Since the purchase of this property would further the goal of co-locating and expanding
the Public Works and Parks Shops, staff has signed a non-binding Letter of Intent to
purchase the property for $2.1 million. The purpose of this study session agenda item is
to determine if City Council would like to proceed to an official contract to purchase this
property.
PRIOR ACTION:
• City Council approved a contract with Stantec Architecture, Inc. on June 13, 2022 for
the development of a FMP
• Recommendations from the FMP were presented to City Council at the February 5,
2024 study session where consensus was reached to move forward with next steps
• City Council approved a contract with Anderson Hallas Architects on September 23,
2024 to conduct a City Facility Feasibility and Planning Study
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The current asking price for the property is $2.5 million. An appraisal was conducted in
Study Session Memo – Property Acquisition for PW & Parks Shops
June 16, 2025
Page 2
April 2024, valuing the property at $2.2 million. The City offered $1.9 million and was
countered at $2.1 (firm) from the seller.
Unrestricted fund balance in the General Fund is currently projected at 20.9% of expenditures. The City anticipates receiving $1,085,000 in revenue from the sale of the
Fruitdale Lofts to Foothills Regional Housing this year which will increase unrestricted
fund balance to 23.1%. Purchasing this property in the amount of $2.1 million from
General Fund reserves would decrease the fund balance to 18.8%.
An alternative would be to borrow the $2.1 million, or a portion of it, from the Urban
Renewal Authority (URA) who currently has reserves available. The City could then
reimburse the Urban Renewal Authority over time which would have less immediate
impact on the General Fund. Due to the uncertainty of the current economy, staff
recommends borrowing as much as possible from the URA and reimbursing over time.
BACKGROUND:
Early in analysis of existing
conditions and assessments, it was
determined by Stantec that
priority should be given to
the Public Works and
Parks departments as their facilities had been
neglected over the years.
Both departments need a
significant increase in
interior and exterior space, which cannot be
accommodated at their
respective shop locations.
The Wheat Ridge Parks department maintains 21
city parks occupying more
than 170 acres, seven
miles of trails, 300 acres of
open space, urban forestry, community gardens, and
nature programs. There are
27 full-time employees assigned to the Parks division and approximately 10 seasonal
employees. The Park Shop area is comprised of one primary office building measuring
2,623 square feet and several storage buildings located immediately west of the
Study Session Memo – Property Acquisition for PW & Parks Shops
June 16, 2025
Page 3
Anderson Building and Pool at Anderson Park. These buildings are the oldest, non-
historic, properties owned by the City.
The Public Works Department has several buildings on one campus totally approximately 39,187 square feet. The Department is responsible for maintaining and
improving the City’s infrastructure, which includes 133 miles of streets and 36 miles of
storm sewers; managing and maintaining the City’s fleet vehicles and equipment; and
administering and monitoring all construction activities within the street’s rights of way
There are approximately 34 full-time employees assigned to the Public Works
Department.
A building condition assessment
was performed on the main building, a secondary building,
and a small shed in between the
two buildings (highlighted in
green). All single-story buildings.
The existing mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems
and equipment were also
observed for compliance with
current applicable codes and
current safety requirements. Any system or equipment not
properly meeting such codes or
safety standards are
subsequently recommended for
remediation. Estimated costs to address concerns in all assessed
buildings would be a total of
$14M.
A building condition assessment was conducted by the Abo Group as part of the Stantec FMP. The assessments considered building systems (mechanical and
electrical), architectural and site conditions and code compliance. Both the Park Shops
and the Public Works Shops received a rating of “Poor”.
Stantec’s recommended direction proposes co-locating the Public Works department and existing Parks Shop functions at one site. A Site Criteria Matrix tool was developed
and used to determine optimal locations for the Public Works and Parks Shop space for
meeting their ten-year space needs. The recommended direction would acquire a
parcel(s) directly south of the existing shop space, which will also allow for direct
Study Session Memo – Property Acquisition for PW & Parks Shops
June 16, 2025
Page 4
connection to W. 44th Ave. The existing Public Works buildings on-site would remain
functional but would need some extensive renovation, based on facility assessments.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Authorize the Purchase of 11221 W. 44th Avenue
• Proceed with an official purchase contract for the property at 11221 W. 44th
Avenue in the amount of $2.1 million.
• Conduct the necessary due diligence including an Alta survey, environmental
assessment of the property, demolition quotes, etc.
• Justification:
o The property acquisition aligns directly with a key FMP recommendation
to co-locate and expand Public Works and Parks Shops.
o This site provides the necessary adjacency to the current Public Works
facility and enables a cohesive, centralized operations campus.
o Acquiring this property would provide direct access for Public Works and Parks operations to 44th Avenue rather than through residential areas as is
currently the case.
2. Utilize Urban Renewal Authority (URA) Funds to Minimize Impact on the General
Fund
• Pursue borrowing the full or partial amount of the $2.1 million from the URA to
fund the property purchase.
• Justification:
o This approach protects General Fund reserves, which would otherwise fall
below the 25% policy target.
o URA reserves are currently available, and this internal financing strategy
provides flexibility during uncertain economic conditions.
o Establish a structured reimbursement agreement to restore URA funds
over time, ensuring accountability and fiscal sustainability.
3. Initiate Master Site Planning and Phasing Strategy
• Direct Anderson Hallas Architects to incorporate the newly acquired parcel into a
comprehensive site plan for co-located Public Works and Parks facilities.
• Ensure that the plan includes:
o Phased construction to allow continuity of operations
o Efficient site circulation and secure vehicle access
o Opportunities for sustainable building and infrastructure upgrades
Study Session Memo – Property Acquisition for PW & Parks Shops
June 16, 2025
Page 5
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Property Marketing Brochure
2. Letter of Intent to Purchase 3. PW Shops Expansion Opportunities Map
ATTACHMENT 1
i:l: UNIQUE� :!ii= PROPElTJES Y:J.1!11!
The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed reliable; however, Unique Properties makes no guarantees, warranties or representations as to the completeness or accuracy thereof. The presentation on this property is submitted subject to errors, omission, changes of price, or conditions, prior to sale or lease, or withdrawal without notice.
(�PINNACLE
June 6, 2025
Hudson Cramer
Brett MacDougall
Michael Desantis
UNIQUE PROPERTIES, INC.
400 S. Broadway, Suite 7
Denver, CO 80209
Sent via email:
hcramer@uniqueprop.com
bmadcourall(ci)uniqueprop.com
mdesantis@uniqueprop.com
RE: Letter of Intent for purchase/sale of Property at 11221 W 44th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO
Gentlemen:
This letter sets forth general terms and conditions by which our client, the City of Wheat Ridge (the
"City" or the "Buyer'') would be willing to enter into a formal Purchase and Sale Agreement (the
"Contract") to buy real estate known as 11221 W 44th Avenue from the current Owners (see below).
Property:
Buyer:
Seller:
Price:
Earnest Money:
Earnest Money Status:
Contingencies:
Page-1-of 4
Approximately 2.36 acres, generally identified as 11221 W 44th Avenue,
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033, more particularly described by a legal
Description, to be provided by title company.
City of Wheat Ridge, a body politic
The Family Ventures, lLC, as to an undivided 2/3 interest, and
Venus J. Chrisp, as to an undivided 1/3 interest
The purchase price shall be $2,100,000
Within five (5) business days of the Mutual Execution Date of a Contract
("MEC"), Buyer shall deposit $50,000 Earnest Money with land Title
Guarantee Company.
The Earnest Money shall be refundable to Buyer until such time as the
Inspection Period has expired and all contingencies have been met.
Upon Sellers acceptance of this Letter of Intent, Buyer shall present the
Letter and a Contract draft to Wheat Ridge City Council at a regularly
scheduled at the 6:30 pm Study Session on Monday June 16, 2025.
Upon approval by Study Session members to continue pursuit of
purchase, the Contract shall be completed in final DRAFT form and
presented to the City Council for approval on Monday July 14, 2025.
Upon approval by City Council, the Contract shall be signed on or before
July 16, 2024.
ATTACHMENT 2
Contract Inspection Period:
Due Diligence:
Title:
Survey:
Environmental:
Leases:
Current Occupancy:
Page-2-of 4
The Contract and Closing shall be contingent upon ability of City of
Wheat Ridge to obtain funding for the purchase amount within the
Inspection Period.
Buyer shall have a 60-day Inspection Period beginning on MEC of the
Contract ("Inspection Period"). Buyer may terminate the Contract at any time prior to the expiration of the Inspection Period for any reason and the Earnest Money shall be fully refunded to the Buyer. Buyer shall
have the right to conduct a legal and physical inspection of all aspects of
review of the Property.
Seller shall provide Buyer with all documents and other information or
all kinds in Seller's possession relating to the Property within ten (10)
days of MEC.
Buyer shall obtain and provide to Seller a title insurance commitment
for an ALTA owner's policy within ten (10) days of mutual acceptance of
this Letter of Intent. Seller shall pay for the Title Insurance Premium at
the time of Closing. Buyer shall pay for any additional endorsements,
known as "Owner's Extended Coverage."
Seller shall provide Buyer with all current or past boundary and/or
improvement surveys in Seller's possession within ten (10) days of
mutual acceptance of this Letter of Intent. Buyer shall have the right to
retain surveying or civil engineering consultants to provide a new or
updated survey of the Property at Buyer's cost.
Seller shall provide Buyer with copies of any environmental reports or
asbestos abatement reports of any kind in its possession within ten (10) days of mutual acceptance of this Letter of Intent.
Buyer shall have the right to retain environmental engineers, at Buyer's
cost, to provide new or updated reports on the Property. Should any
environmental inspection reveal a need for further testing, sampling or
investigation, the Inspection Period of the Contract shall be
automatically extended by an additional 45 days upon presentation of
such information from Buyer to Seller in writing.
Seller shall provide Buyer with copies of all leases and any other tenant
related information in its possession within ten (10) days of mutual
acceptance of this Letter of Intent.
Closing shall not occur with any residential or commercial tenants in
occupancy anywhere on the Property. Seller shall be responsible for
Inspection Activities:
Closing:
Brokerage:
No Violation/ Default/
Government Notice:
Contract:
notifying tenants of lease expiration and any tenants' orderly surrender
of the Property.
Buyer shall be allowed to obtain proposals from surveying, engineering,
and environmental consultants for Inspection Activities prior to entering
a signed Contract. Buyer shall be allowed to obtain estimates for
potential demolition of existing improvements, or reconstruction, prior
to entering a signed Contract.
In the interest of time, Buyer prefers consultants to immediately begin
work (survey, environmental) upon execution of a final Contract. Seller
agrees to allow access to such consultants and contractors for
estimating purposes upon mutual acceptance of this Letter of Intent.
Such consultants will not need to gain access within any residential
structure on the Property. Access to the Property shall be coordinated
through the Listing Brokers.
During the Inspection Period after MEC, if any consultants need to do
any invasive or destructive sampling or testing, any such damage will be
minimal or restored by Buyer or Buyer's consultants.
Closing shall occur on October 31, 2025, or earlier upon mutual
agreement of the parties.
Buyer and Seller acknowledge and agree that Unique Properties is the
Listing Broker and is a fiduciary agent of the Seller and no other party.
Esther Kettering and Joe Owston of Pinnacle Real Estate Advisors are
authorized agents and fiduciaries of the Buyer. Pinnacle Real Estate
Advisors shall accept a cooperating broker fee from the Seller or Listing
Broker pursuant to a separate written agreement.
Seller shall represent at time of Contract execution that the property is
not under any governmental notice, condemnation, bankruptcy,
receivership, violation, or default, except an unpaid lien by City of
Wheat Ridge recorded at Jefferson County Records #2019005434.
This Letter of Intent is not a Contract. It is not a binding agreement on
either party. This Letter shall be superseded by a formal Purchase and
Sale Agreement (the "Contract") which shall supersede in all respects
the provisions hereof and the Contract shall be deemed to be the entire
agreement upon execution.
Buyer shall provide Seller with a DRAFT Contract form prior to June 16,
2025 City of Wheat Ridge Study Session.
Validity, Response Deadline: The general outline of terms and conditions set forth in this Letter of
Intent shall be valid until 5:00 pm Monday, June 11, 2025 when Buyer
requests the favor of a written acceptance or reply by Seller.
We look forward to your response and appreciate your careful consideration of the offer.
Feel free to call with any questions.
Sincerely,
Pinnacle Real Estate Advisors
Esther Kettering
Vice President
ekettering@pinnaclerea.co
303 056 0444
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
BUYER: City of Wheat Ridge
Patrick Goff 1 1
Its: City Manager
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
SELLER: The Family Ventures, LLC
2/3 undivided interest
By: ________ _ Francesca Amor Chrisp
Its: Member/Manager
Date: _________ _
Joe Owston
Broker Associate
iowston@pinnaclerea.com
303 396 2663
SELLER: VENUS J. CHRISP
1/3 undivided interest
By: _______ _ Venus J. Chrisp
Date:
ATTACHMENT 3