HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-22-2025 City Council Meeting agendaAGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
Monday, September 22, 2025
6:30 p.m.
This meeting will be conducted as a virtual meeting, and in person, at: 7500 West 29th
Avenue, Municipal Building, Council Chambers.
City Council members and City staff members will be physically present at the
Municipal building for this meeting. The public may participate in these ways:
1. Attend the meeting in person at City Hall. Use the appropriate roster to sign up to
speak upon arrival.
2. Provide comment in advance at www.wheatridgespeaks.org (comment by noon on
September 22, 2025)
3. Virtually attend and participate in the meeting through a device or phone:
Click here to pre-register and provide public comment by Zoom (You must
preregister before 6:00 p.m. on September 22, 2025)
4. View the meeting live or later at www.wheatridgespeaks.org, Channel 8, or YouTube
Live at https://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/view
Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings
sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. The City will upon request, provide auxiliary
aids and services leading to effective communication for people with disabilities,
including qualified sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, documents
in Braille, and other ways of making communications accessible to people who have
speech, hearing, or vision impairments. To request auxiliary aid, service for effective
communication, or document in a different format, please use this form or contact
ADA Coordinator, (Kelly McLaughlin at ada@ci.wheatridge.co.us or 303-235-2885) as
soon as possible, preferably 7 days before the activity or event.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES
1. Proclamation – Breast Cancer Awareness Month
2. Proclamation – Domestic Violence Awareness Month
PUBLICS’ RIGHT TO SPEAK
• Public may speak on any matter not on the agenda for a maximum of 3 minutes
under Publics’ Right to Speak. Please speak up to be heard when directed by the
mayor.
• Members of the Public who wish to speak on a Public Hearing item or Decision,
Resolution, or Motion may speak when directed by the mayor at the conclusion of
the staff report for that specific agenda item.
• Members of the Public may comment on any agenda item in writing by noon on the
day of the meeting at www.WheatRidgeSpeaks.org. Comments made on Wheat
Ridge Speaks are considered part of the public record.
CONSENT AGENDA
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING
1. Resolution No. 45-2025, a resolution approving the Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
and finding that the Plan Area is a blighted area, designating such area as
appropriate for an urban renewal project pursuant to the Plan, and finding that the
acquisition, clearance, rehabilitation, conservation, development, redevelopment, or
a combination thereof of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health,
safety, morals, and welfare of the residents of the City of Wheat Ridge
2. Resolution No. 46-2025 – a resolution approving the Lutheran Legacy Campus
Urban Renewal Plan and finding that the Plan Area is a blighted area, designating
such area as appropriate for an urban renewal project pursuant to the Plan, and
finding that the acquisition, clearance, rehabilitation, conservation, development,
redevelopment, or a combination thereof of such area is necessary in the interest of
the public health, safety, morals, and welfare of the residents of the City of Wheat
Ridge
3. Council Bill No. 18-2025 – an ordinance approving the disposition of park land at
Hank Stites Park and in connection therewith authorizing an exchange of land to
correct the property boundary
ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING
4. Council Bill No. 19-2025 – an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located
at 10285 Ridge Road from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Mixed Use Commercial – Transit
Oriented Development (MUC-TOD)
DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND MOTIONS
5. Resolution No. 47-2025 – a resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement
concerning regional cold weather response for those experiencing homelessness
6. Motion to approve appointments to Boards, Commissions, and Committees
7. Resolution No. 48-2025 – a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2025 Capital
Improvement Program budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget
appropriation in the amount of $5 million for the purpose of issuing a contract
amendment in the amount of $5,374,077.75 for construction of the Improve
Wadsworth project to Concrete Works of Colorado Inc.
8. Resolution No. 49-2025 – a resolution of support for an application to the Colorado
Parks and Wildlife Non-Motorized Trails Grant program
CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS
CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS
ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS
PROCLAMATION
BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH
WHEREAS, October 2025 marks 40 years that National Breast Cancer Awareness Month has
educated women about early breast cancer detection, diagnosis and treatment; and
WHEREAS, one in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer within their lifetime; and
WHEREAS, when breast cancer is detected early and is in the localized stage, the five-year
survival rate for women is 99%; and
WHEREAS, the awareness campaign is remembering those who have lost their fight against
breast cancer, standing with those who remember their loved ones and continuing to support our
Nation’s advocates; and
WHEREAS, the American Cancer Society has searched endlessly for a cure through vital
research and has the mammoth task of educating our community and all Americans of the risks of
breast cancer; and
WHEREAS, the Lutheran Breast Care Center at Lutheran Hospital offers comprehensive breast
care for all individuals, including patients with breast cancer as well as high risk individuals, ensuring
a compassionate and patient-centered journey from initial screening to survivorship.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that I, Bud Starker, Mayor of the City of Wheat Ridge, and
the Wheat Ridge City Council hereby proclaim October 2025 as BREAST CANCER AWARENESS
MONTH in the City of Wheat Ridge and encourage residents of Wheat Ridge to celebrate successes
and memorialize lost battles.
IN WITNESS THEREOF on this 22nd day of September 2025.
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk Bud Starker, Mayor
PROCLAMATION
NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH
WHEREAS, domestic violence impacts countless Coloradans, without regard to age, race,
religion, or economic status; as victims suffer at the hands of a spouse or partner, it affects their
children, families, and entire communities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge is committed to the reduction of domestic violence and
the health, safety and welfare of its residents; and
WHEREAS, the Wheat Ridge Police Department is committed to providing assistance to
victims and witnesses of crime and other traumatic events through victim assistance partnerships and
awareness-related efforts and events; and
WHEREAS, Wheat Ridge supports and partners with the PorchLight Family Justice Center
which provides comprehensive legal, emotional and critical supportive services for survivors of
domestic violence; and
WHEREAS, Wheat Ridge joins with others across Colorado and the nation in supporting
victims of domestic violence and shares the worthy goals of this month-long observance and sending
a loud and clear message to abusers that domestic violence is not tolerated in the City of Wheat
Ridge.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that I, Bud Starker, Mayor of the City of Wheat Ridge,
and the Wheat Ridge City Council hereby proclaim October 2025 as DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
AWARENESS MONTH in the City of Wheat Ridge.
IN WITNESS THEREOF on this 22nd day of September 2025.
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk Bud Starker, Mayor
ITEM NUMBER: 1
DATE: September 22, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
RESOLUTION 45-2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CLEARVALE URBAN
RENEWAL PLAN AND FINDING THAT THE PLAN AREA IS A
BLIGHTED AREA, DESIGNATING SUCH AREA AS
APPROPRIATE FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT
PURSUANT TO THE PLAN, AND FINDING THAT THE
ACQUISITION, CLEARANCE, REHABILITATION,
CONSERVATION, DEVELOPMENT, REDEVELOPMENT, OR A
COMBINATION THEREOF OF SUCH AREA IS NECESSARY IN
THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALS,
AND WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT
RIDGE
☒PUBLIC HEARING
☐BIDS/MOTIONS
☒RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
Urban renewal plans are adopted by City Council and implemented by the Urban
Renewal Authority d/b/a Renewal Wheat Ridge. The proposed Clearvale Urban Renewal
Plan area is generally located between Wadsworth Boulevard and Carr Street and
meanders along the floodplain to 44th Avenue and then west to Garrison Street and
includes Garrison Street to I70 Frontage Road North. The Plan will allow for the use of
tax increment financing (TIF) within the plan area.
PRIOR ACTION:
A draft Carr Street Urban Renewal Plan (now titled Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan) was
presented to City Council at the March 18, 2024 study session. Consensus was
reached at that time to bring back the Plan for formal adoption at a subsequent
meeting.
On February 15, 2024, the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission unanimously adopted a
resolution finding that the Plan adheres to the City's Comprehensive Plan, Envision
Wheat Ridge, consistent with the process set forth in the Colorado Urban Renewal
Council Action Form – Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
September 22, 2025
Page 2
Law.
On May 14, 2025, City Council adopted an ordinance to comply with House Bill 15-
1348 in regard to urban renewal authority board membership and tax sharing
agreements with taxing entities within the urban renewal area.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Approval of the Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan will have no direct impact on the City's
budget but could provide for future redevelopment opportunities that further the City's
economic development goals.
BACKGROUND:
Renewal Wheat Ridge (RWR) contracted with Economic and Planning Systems (EPS)
to complete a Conditions Survey to analyze conditions within the plan area to
determine whether factors contributing to blight are present and whether the Plan area
may, therefore, be considered eligible as an urban renewal area under the provision of
the Colorado Urban Renewal Law. It is the conclusion of this survey that there are
physical conditions within the Plan area sufficient to meet criteria in Colorado law as
"blighting factors." Specifically, seven of the possible 11 blight factors were found to
be present including:
1. Street layout: poor provisions or unsafe conditions for pedestrians, poor
internal vehicular or pedestrian circulation
2. Lot layout: poor vehicular access
3. Unsafe/unsanitary: cracked or uneven surfaces for pedestrians, excessive
litter, vandalism/graffiti, open ditches, holes, or trenches in pedestrian areas
4. Site improvements: neglected properties, deteriorated signage, lighting, on-
site parking surfaces, curb and gutter, or sidewalks, and unpaved parking lot
5. Infrastructure: deteriorated pavement, curb, sidewalks, or lighting; unusual
topography
6. Endangerment: floodplain or flood hazards
7. Vacancy: vacant structures and an underdeveloped parcel in a generally
urbanized area
EPS created the draft Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan with the purpose and vision of
reducing, eliminating and preventing the spread of blight and to stimulate and catalyze
growth and investment within the area boundaries. To accomplish this purpose the
Plan is intended to promote local objectives expressed in adopted community plans
such as the 44th Avenue Sub Area Plan, approved by City Council in April 2023 and
advance the priorities of the Envision Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan as well as the
newly adopted City Plan.
Council Action Form – Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
September 22, 2025
Page 3
The Plan addresses financing mechanisms and methodology involved in financing
activities pursuant to Urban Renewal Law. The Plan contemplates that the primary
method of assisting with financing eligible expenses in the Plan Area will be through the
use of revenues generated by Property Tax Increment and Sales Tax Increment. It is the
intent of the City Council in approving this Plan to authorize the use of tax increment
financing (TIF) by RWR as part of its efforts to advance the vision, objectives, and
activities described in the Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan for the following
reasons:
• The Plan is consistent with many of the values, goals. and strategies stated in the
City Plan.
• The Plan will facilitate the redevelopment of a blighted area and help stimulate
growth in jobs, housing, sales tax, and aesthetic appeal of the community.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Resolution No. 45-2025, a resolution approving the Clearvale Urban
Renewal Plan and finding that the Plan Area is a blighted area designating such area
as appropriate for an urban renewal project pursuant to the Plan, and finding that the
acquisition, clearance, rehabilitation, conservation, development, redevelopment, or a
combination thereof of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health,
safety, morals, and welfare of the residents of the City of Wheat Ridge."
Or,
“I move to table indefinitely Resolution No. 45-2025, a resolution approving the
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan and finding that the Plan Area is a blighted area
designating such area as appropriate for an Urban Renewal Project pursuant to the
Plan, and finding that the acquisition, clearance, rehabilitation, conservation,
development, redevelopment, or a combination thereof of such area is necessary in
the interest of the public health, safety, morals, and welfare of the residents of the City
of Wheat Ridge, for the following reason(s) _____ "
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Steve Art, Executive Director RWR
Corey Hoffmann, RWR Legal Counsel
Patrick Goff, City Manager
Council Action Form – Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
September 22, 2025
Page 4
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 45-2025
2. Exhibit A – Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
3. Clearvale Conditions Survey
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 45
SERIES OF 2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CLEARVALE URBAN RENEWAL
PLAN AND FINDING THAT THE PLAN AREA IS A BLIGHTED AREA,
DESIGNATING SUCH AREA AS APPROPRIATE FOR AN URBAN
RENEWAL PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PLAN, AND FINDING
THAT THE ACQUISITION, CLEARANCE, REHABILITATION,
CONSERVATION, DEVELOPMENT, REDEVELOPMENT, OR A
COMBINATION THEREOF OF SUCH AREA IS NECESSARY IN THE
INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALS, AND
WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
WHEREAS, an urban renewal plan for the Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan Area (the
“Area”) has been submitted to the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge pursuant to
Part 1 of Article 25 of Title 31, C.R.S.;
WHEREAS, the Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan Area which is subject to the
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan (the “Plan”) is described in Exhibit A to this Resolution;
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has submitted its written
recommendation to the City Council that the Plan is in conformance with the Wheat
Ridge Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 31-25-107(2), C.R.S.;
WHEREAS, a copy of the Plan and information regarding the impact of the Plan
were submitted to the taxing entities imposing a mill levy on the Plan Area;
WHEREAS, notices of the public hearing for consideration and approval of the
Plan by City Council were provided by publication and by written notices to property
owners, residents, and business owners in the Area in compliance with the Urban
Renewal Law, C.R.S. §§ 31-25-101 et seq.;
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the Plan was held on September 22, 2025,
providing a full opportunity for property owners, residents, taxpayers, people and
business owners in the Area and all interested persons to be heard;
WHEREAS, the inclusion of certain areas and properties designated in the Plan
within the Area would provide for the elimination and prevention of blight and the
development, redevelopment and rehabilitation of the blighted areas, so that the areas
can be developed or redeveloped by the public and private sectors to provide a safer
and more useful environment for its users and inhabitants; to develop and redevelop
such properties to provide necessary, greater and reasonable economic utilization of
such areas; to promote, enhance and provide public facilities; to eliminate traffic,
transportation, pedestrian and other hazards within the areas; to ensure reasoned and
sound social, physical and economic growth and improvement within the City; to
promote the public health, safety and welfare; to promote and effect the goals,
objectives and purposes of the Plan and the Comprehensive Plan of the City; to provide
a sound financial and economic base for the community; to provide a necessary tax
base for the City and to comply with the intent and purpose of the Urban Renewal Law;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a public hearing, considered the
public testimony, and hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the City of
Wheat Ridge and the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority to adopt the Plan as
proposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Wheat Ridge City Council, that:
Section 1. Blight as defined by C.R.S. § 31-25-103(2) is present in the
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan Area as documented by the City of Wheat Ridge Clearvale
Conditions Survey prepared by Economic and Planning Systems and based on evidence
presented at the public hearing. The following blight factors are present in the Clearvale
Urban Renewal Area: Street layout: poor provisions or unsafe conditions for pedestrians,
poor internal vehicular or pedestrian circulation; Lot layout: poor vehicular access;
Unsafe/unsanitary: cracked or uneven surfaces for pedestrians, excessive litter,
vandalism/graffiti, excessive litter, open ditches, holes, or trenches in pedestrian areas;
Site improvements: neglected properties, deteriorated signage, lighting, on-site parking
surfaces, curb and gutter, or sidewalks, and unpaved parking lot; Infrastructure:
deteriorated pavement, curb, sidewalks, or lighting; unusual topography;
Endangerment: floodplain or flood hazards; Vacancy: vacant structures and an
underdeveloped parcel in a generally urbanized area.
Section 2. The Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan Area is a blighted area and is
appropriate for an urban renewal project, pursuant to Part 1 of Article 25 of Title 31, C.R.S.
Section 3. The principal purpose for the adoption of the Clearvale Urban Plan is
to facilitate redevelopment in order to eliminate or prevent the spread of physically
blighted areas.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings with respect to
the proposed Plan:
A. A feasible method exists for the relocation of families or individuals
who may or will be displaced by redevelopment projects in decent, safe
and sanitary dwelling accommodations within their means and without
undue hardship.
B. A feasible method exists for the relocation of business concerns that
may or will be displaced by redevelopment projects either in the Area
or in other areas that are not generally less desirable regarding public
utilities and public and commercial facilities.
C. The City Council has caused its staff to take reasonable efforts to
provide written notice of the public hearing to property owners,
residents and business owners in the Area at their last known
addresses at least 30 days prior to this public hearing of September
22, 2025.
D. Section 31-25-107 (4) (e) C.R.S. of the Urban Renewal Law does not
apply in that not more than 120 days have passed since the first public
hearing on this Plan, because this is the first public hearing.
E. Section 31-25-107 (4) (e) C.R.S. of the Urban Renewal Law does not
apply in that City Council did not fail to previously approve this Plan
F. The Plan conforms to the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
G. The provisions of the Plan, consistent with the needs of the City,
provide maximum opportunity for redevelopment of the Area by private
enterprise.
H. Section 31-25-107 (5) C.R.S. of the Urban Renewal Law is not
applicable to this Plan.
I. To the extent that the Area may consist of an areas of open land which
may be developed for non-residential uses under the Plan, City Council
hereby determines that such non-residential uses are necessary and
appropriate to facilitate the proper growth and development of the City
in accordance with sound planning standards and City’s objectives.
The potential acquisition of such areas may require the actions of the
Authority, in compliance with the Urban Renewal Law, because such
open areas are within areas of blight or blighted conditions.
J. City Council has determined that the boundaries of the Areas have
been drawn as narrowly as feasible to accomplish the planning and
development objectives of the Plan in accordance with Section 31-25-
107(1) C.R.S. of the Urban Renewal Law.
K. The acquisition clearance rehabilitation conservation development or
redevelopment or a combination thereof of the Clearvale Urban Renewal
Area pursuant to the Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan is necessary and in
the best interests of the public health, safety, morals, and welfare of the
residents of the City of Wheat Ridge.
Section 5. The Plan provides for the use of tax increment financing, such
financing mechanisms will be utilized with the initial adoption of this Plan.
Section 6. Taxing entities imposing a mill levy upon the Plan Area were provided
a copy of the Plan and information regarding its impact, in compliance with Urban
Renewal Law.
Section 7. The Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority is authorized to exercise
the powers of eminent domain to carry out, effect or administer the Plan.
Section 8. The proposed Plan accompanying this Resolution and incorporated
herein is adopted as the Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan for the City of Wheat Ridge
and may be referred to as the Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan. The Plan is an urban
renewal plan as defined in Section 31-25-103(9) C.R.S. of the Urban Renewal Law
Section 9. The Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan shall control the land area, land
use, design, building requirements, timing of development, and procedure for
implementation of such Plan in the Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan Area and in the
City of Wheat Ridge, as may be applicable.
DONE AND RESOLVED this 22nd day of September 2025.
[SEAL] Bud Starker, Mayor
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
Clearvale
Urban Renewal Plan
Prepared for:
Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority dba Renewal Wheat Ridge
and the City of Wheat Ridge
Prepared by:
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
October 2, 2023
EPS #233048
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT A
I
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................. 1
Preface ........................................................................................................ 1
Blight Findings .............................................................................................. 1
Urban Renewal Area Boundaries ...................................................................... 1
Definitions ............................................................................................... 4
Plan Purpose ............................................................................................ 6
Vision .......................................................................................................... 6
Blight Conditions ...................................................................................... 8
Plan Goals and Conformance .................................................................... 10
Plan Goals and Objectives ............................................................................ 10
Plan Conformance ....................................................................................... 10
Authorized Urban Renewal Undertakings and Activities ................................ 16
Project Financing .................................................................................... 20
Financing Powers ........................................................................................ 20
Tax Increment Financing District ................................................................... 21
Property Tax Increment Financing ................................................................. 21
Sales Tax Increment Financing ...................................................................... 23
Tax Increment Reimbursements .................................................................... 24
Severability and Reasonable Variations ...................................................... 25
Effective Date of the Plan ......................................................................... 26
E x h ib it A: L e g al D e s c r ip t io n ......................................................... 27
List of Figures
Figure 1. Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan Area.......................................................... 2
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
233048-Draft Clearvale URA Plan 10-2-2023.docx 1
Introduction
Preface
This Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan (“Plan” or the “Urban Renewal Plan”) has been
prepared for the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado (the “City”), a home rule
municipal corporation of the State of Colorado. The Plan will be carried out by the
Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority (the “Authority”), pursuant to the
provisions of the Urban Renewal Law of the State of Colorado, Part 1 of Article 25
of Title 31, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, as amended to date (the “Act”). The
administration and implementation of this Plan, including the preparation and
execution of any documents implementing it, shall be performed by the Authority.
Blight Findings
Under the Act, an urban renewal area is a blighted area, as defined by the Act,
and has been designated as appropriate for an urban renewal project by the City
Council of the City (the “City Council”). In each urban renewal area, conditions of
blight must be present, and the City Council must find that the presence of those
conditions of blight substantially impair or arrest the sound growth of the
municipality or constitutes an economic or social liability, and is a menace to the
public health, safety, morals, or welfare for the Authority to exercise its powers.
The Clearvale Conditions Survey prepared by Economic & Planning Systems (EPS)
in August 2023 (“Conditions Survey”) was provided to the Authority under
separate cover and demonstrates that the Clearvale Study Area (“Study Area”),
as defined in the Conditions Study, is eligible to be declared a blighted area by
the City Council under the Act. The Conditions Survey identified and documented
7 of the 11 blight factors present in the Study Area. A description of the blight
factors and observations is presented below in Section 4 of this report.
Urban Renewal Area Boundaries
The Clearvale Urban Renewal Area (“URA” or “Plan Area”) is located in the City of
Wheat Ridge in Jefferson County. The Plan Area is comprised of 28 parcels on
approximately 109 acres of land plus adjacent right-of-way (ROW). The location
of the Plan Area to which this Plan applies is generally bound by West I-70
Frontage Road North to the north, West 44th Avenue to the south, Garison Street
to the west, and Wadsworth Boulevard and Clear Creek to the east, as shown
below in Figure 1 and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto
and made a part of hereof.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
2
Figure 1. Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan Area
Ownership
Parcels located within the Plan Area are owned by 15 individual owners including
multiple parcels owned by the City of Wheat Ridge, Arvex Properties Inc., Wheat
Ridge Industrial Park LLC, Triad Real Estate, and Exchange 8150 West 48th Ave
LLC. The full list of owners is provided below.
• 9195 W 444th Ave LLC
• Arvex Properties Inc.
• Boyd Michael J
• City of Wheat Ridge
• DTI Holdings LLC
• Exchange 8150 West 48th Ave LLC
• Jeffco Housing Corporation
• Macatr LLC
• Metropolitan Denver Sewage
Disposal District
• Potuzak Charles
• Ridgeview Center LLC
• Thompson Max L
• Triad Real Estate
• Wheat Ridge Lumber LLC
• Wheat Ridge Industrial Park LLC
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
233048-Draft Clearvale URA Plan 10-2-2023.docx 3
Zoning and Land Use
The properties within the Plan Area are largely developed with older commercial
and industrial development and there is one site that is currently vacant that
could be developed as an industrial property. Additionally, there is open space
with Clear Creek and the Clear Creek trail running through the eastern side of the
Plan Area. The Plan Area includes a mix of industrial, commercial, and residential
zone districts including Industrial Employment (I-E), Planned Industrial
Development (PID), Commercial-One (C-1), Commercial-Two (C-2), Residential-
Two (R-2), and Residential-Three (R-3). Additionally, there is a small portion zoned
as Agricultural-One (A-1), but it is currently used for industrial and is surrounded
by established development. Each zoning district is further described below.
The industrial zone districts are located in the northeast corner of the Plan Area.
Industrial Employment (I-E) is intended for light industrial and commercial uses
that support employment. Planned Industrial Development (PID) is intended to
promote health, safety, and general welfare by permitting greater flexibility and
innovation in land development based upon a comprehensive, integrated plan.
The commercial zone districts are located along the south side of the Plan Area
along 44th Avenue. Commercial-One (C-1) is intended to provide a wide range of
commercial land uses, including office, general business, and retail sales and
service establishments. Commercial-Two (C-2) is intended to provide an even
wider range of commercial land uses, including office, general business, more
intensive retail sales, wholesale businesses, and light manufacturing.
The residential zone districts are located along the eastern side of the Plan Area.
This area is currently used for open space on either side of Clear Creek and includes
the Clear Creek Trail. Wheat Ridge Park, located at the corner of 44th Avenue and
Everett Drive, is zoned R-3 and is an affordable housing development owned by
Foothills Regional Housing. This residentially zoned area is not expected to
redevelop. Residential-Two (R-2) provides high quality, safe, quiet, and stable low
to moderate density residential neighborhoods. Residential-Three (R-3) provides
high quality, safe, quiet, and stable medium to high density residential
neighborhoods.
The area zoned as A-1 is anticipated to be rezoned before redevelopment occurs.
This area is most likely to rezone to I-E, which aligns with the adjacent parcels.
Agricultural-One (A-1) is intended for high quality, safe, quiet, and stable
residential estate living environment within a quasi-rural or agricultural setting.
This zone district permits large lot, single unit residential and related uses, and
agricultural uses and activities.
The land uses proposed in the Plan Area generally algin with the zoning
classifications, particularly with the anticipated rezoning of the one site currently
designated as A-1. The area is predominately industrial and commercial uses, and
is generally consistent with the underlying zoning.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
4
Definitions
Terms used in this Plan are defined below and are representative of Urban Renewal
Law C.R.S. § 31-25-103.
• Act or Urban Renewal Law – Urban Renewal Law of the State of Colorado,
C.R.S. § 31-25-101 et seq.
• Available Property Tax Increment Revenues – all Property Tax Increment
Revenues available pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing provisions of the
Act not payable to taxing bodies pursuant to agreements, if any, with the
Authority or otherwise as provided in C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9.5) of the Act. In
the event that an agreement is reached with a taxing body pursuant to C.R.S. §
31-25-107(9.5) of the Act after the effective date of Plan approval by the City
Council, the Property Tax Increment Revenues generated by said taxing
body’s mill levy shall become Available Property Tax Increment Revenues, and
the addition of such revenue shall not be a substantial modification to this
Plan.
• Available Revenues – any and all revenues available to the Authority,
including, without limitation, Available Property Tax Increment Revenues, any
revenues available to the Authority from Districts, or any other source that
are available under this Plan or otherwise under the Act.
• Bonds – any bonds (including refunding bonds), notes, interim certificates or
receipts, temporary bonds, certificates of indebtedness, debentures, or other
obligations.
• District (or Districts) – for purposes of C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9) means a
metropolitan district which is a quasi-municipal corporation and political
subdivision of the State of Colorado organized under the Colorado Special
District Act, 32-1-101, et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or a
business improvement district which is a quasi-municipal corporation and
political subdivision of the State of Colorado organized under the Colorado
Business Improvement District Act, 31-25-1201, et seq., C.R.S., as from time
to time amended, or any successor District or Districts thereto as may be
approved by the City. Provided however, for purposes of C.R.S. § 31-25-104,
the term “District” shall be limited to metropolitan [or special] district which is
a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado
organized under the Colorado Special District Act, 32-1-101, et seq., C.R.S.
• Property Taxes – means, without limitation, all levies to be made on an ad
valorem basis by or for the benefit of any public body upon taxable real and
personal property in the Area.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
5
• Property Tax Increment Revenues – the property tax revenues allocated to
the Authority pursuant to C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9) of the Act and Section 7.0 of
this Plan.
• Real property – lands, lands under water, structures, and any and all
easements, franchises, incorporeal hereditaments, and every estate and right
therein, legal and equitable, including terms for years and liens by way of
judgment, mortgage, or otherwise.
• Redevelopment/Development Agreement – one or more agreements
between the Authority and developer(s) and/or property owners or such other
individuals or entities as determined by the Authority to be essential to carry
out the objectives of this Plan.
• Slum area – an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or
improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, and which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for
ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population
and overcrowding, or the existence of conditions which endanger life or
property by fire or other causes, or any combination of such factors, is
conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile
delinquency, or crime and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals,
or welfare.
• Tax increment financing (TIF) – the tax allocation financing as described in
C.R.S. 31-25-107(9) of the Act as in effect on the date this Plan is approved
by City Council.
• Urban Renewal Authority or Authority – a corporate body organized
pursuant to the provisions of the Act for the purposes, with the powers, and
subject to the restrictions set forth in the Act.
• Urban Renewal Plan or Plan – a plan, as it exists from time to time, for an
urban renewal project, which plan conforms to a general or master plan for
the physical development of the municipality as a whole and which is
sufficiently complete to indicate such land acquisition, demolition and removal
of structures, redevelopment, improvements, and rehabilitation as may be
proposed to be carried out in the urban renewal area, zoning and planning
changes, if any, land uses, maximum densities, building requirements, and
the plan's relationship to definite local objectives respecting appropriate land
uses, improved traffic, public transportation, public utilities, recreational and
community facilities, and other public improvements.
• Urban Renewal Project – undertakings and activities for the elimination and
for the prevention of the development or spread of slums and blight and may
involve slum clearance and redevelopment, or rehabilitation, or conservation,
or any combination or part thereof, in accordance with an urban renewal plan.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
6
Plan Purpose
The purpose of this Plan is to reduce, eliminate, and prevent the spread of blight
within the Plan Area through private development. The Plan sets goals to achieve
this through implementing established objectives for the Area and assisting with
the eligible costs of environmental mitigation, redevelopment, promoting
economic growth and private investment through the tools available within the
context of urban renewal tools, laws, and guidelines, including, without limitation,
tax increment financing (TIF).
Establishment of the Urban Renewal Area will help improve conditions by
providing public resources to be paired with private investment that enable
property owners and developers to mitigate blight and transform the area. The
urban renewal efforts will be focused within the plan area for the duration in
accordance with the mandates of the Act.
Vision
The overall vision of the Plan Area, as expressed in the 44th Avenue Subarea Plan,
is an industrial employment node and commercial corridor. In the Subarea Plan,
the City identified transformational elements that, in addition to the
redevelopment of sites in the subarea, also calls for improved street and
multimodal connections, and new streetscape elements. The Plan Area is within
the urban context and will offer redevelopment and infill development
opportunities rather than developing on the outside or edges of the city.
The northeast corner of the Plan Area is envisioned as an industrial employment
node. This area currently consists of industrial employment users with
opportunities for redevelopment. This node is anticipated to expand with a larger
mix of employment types such as a diversity of industrial and automotive uses.
The priority is to preserve and expand the industrial nature and employment
opportunities with economic benefit and job growth.
The vision for the southern section of the Plan Area, as described in the 44th
Avenue Subarea Plan, is a commercial node along 44th Avenue from Garrison
Street to Clear Creek with a focus on small business. This node is targeted for
infill and redevelopment of existing commercial properties into a mix of retail and
office uses that prioritize local and family-oriented businesses. These commercial
properties will include public improvements such as bike parking, seating,
lighting, signage and wayfinding, and landscaping. The 44th Avenue Bridge at
Clear Creek will have multimodal additions, such as space allocated to pedestrians
and bikes or a new parallel bridge for pedestrians and bikes. ROW improvements
throughout the Plan Area with a focus on 44th Avenue and Garrison Street, may
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
7
include landscape and tree planting, pedestrian and bike infrastructure, improved
crossings, streetscape, public art, and undergrounding overhead utilities.
To improve neighborhood connectivity, additional sidewalk connections will be
made to Clear Creek Trail at available points. On the north side of the Plan Area,
the I-70 underpass at Carr Street will be improved with increased lighting, public
art, and physical buffers for safer crossings.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
8
Blight Conditions
Before an urban renewal plan can be adopted by the City Council, there must be a
determination that an area constitutes a blighted area. This determination
depends upon the presence of several physical, environmental, and social factors.
Blight is attributable to a range of conditions that, in combination, tend to
accelerate the phenomenon of deterioration of an area. The definition of a
blighted area is based upon the definition articulated in the Urban Renewal Law
(C.R.S. § 31-25-103) as follows:
“Blighted area” means an area that, in its present condition and use and, by
reason of the presence of at least four of the following factors, substantially
impairs or arrests the sound growth of the municipality, retards the provision
of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability, and
is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare:
a. Slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures;
b. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout;
c. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or
usefulness;
d. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions;
e. Deterioration of site or other improvements;
f. Unusual topography or inadequate public improvements or utilities;
g. Defective or unusual conditions of title rendering the title
nonmarketable;
h. The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire and
other causes;
i. Buildings that are unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work in
because of building code violations, dilapidation, deterioration,
defective design, physical construction, or faulty or inadequate
facilities;
j. Environmental contamination of buildings or property;
k.5. The existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high levels
of municipal services or substantial physical underutilization or
vacancy of sites, building, or other improvements; or
l. If there is no objection by the property owner or owners and the
tenant or tenants of such owner or owners, if any, to the inclusion of
such property in an urban renewal area, "blighted area" also means an
area that, in its present condition and use and, by reason of the
presence of any one of the factors specified in paragraphs (a) to (k.5)
of this subsection (2), substantially impairs or arrests the sound
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
9
growth of the municipality, retards the provision of housing
accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability, and is a
menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. For purposes
of this paragraph (l), the fact that an owner of an interest in such
property does not object to the inclusion of such property in the urban
renewal area does not mean that the owner has waived any rights of
such owner in connection with laws governing condemnation.
To use the powers of eminent domain, the definition of “blighted” is broadened to
require that five of the eleven blight factors must be present (C.R.S. § 31-25-
105.5(5)(a)):
(a) “Blighted area” shall have the same meaning as set forth in section 31-25-
103 (2); except that, for the purposes of this section only, “blighted area”
means an area that, in its present condition and use and, by reason of the
presence of at least five of the factors specified in section 31-25-103 (2)(a) to
(2)(l), substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the municipality,
retards the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic
or social liability, and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or
welfare.
The methodology used to prepare the Conditions Survey for the Plan Area
involved the following steps: (i) identify parcels to be included in the Plan Area;
(ii) gather information about the properties and infrastructure within the Plan
Area boundaries; (iii) evaluate evidence of blight through field reconnaissance;
and (iv) record observed and documented conditions listed as blight factors in
State Statute. The entire Conditions Survey is provided under separate cover.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
10
Plan Goals and Conformance
Plan Goals and Objectives
The overall objective of this Plan is to remediate unfavorable existing conditions
and prevent further deterioration by implementation of the relevant provisions
contained in the following documents:
• Envision Wheat Ridge (City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan), 2009
• 44th Avenue Subarea Plan, 2023
The Plan is intended to stimulate private sector development in the Plan Area with
a combination of private investment and Authority financing. The Plan has the
following objectives:
• Implement Envision Wheat Ridge and 44th Avenue Subarea Plan
• Prevent and eliminate conditions of blight within the City of Wheat Ridge
• Encourage and provide incentives for private and economic development
• Encourage the development of projects that would not otherwise be
considered financially feasible without the participation of Renewal Wheat
Ridge (RWR)
• Enhance the current property tax revenue within the city and county with
development that will increase the assessed valuation
Plan Conformance
Urban Renewal Law
This Plan is in conformity with and subject to the applicable statutory requirements
of the Urban Renewal Law.
Envision Wheat Ridge
The City of Wheat Ridge last updated and adopted its Comprehensive Plan, known
as Envision Wheat Ridge, in 2009, which established the vision and direction for
the future of Wheat Ridge. The City’s vision is organized around six key values to
describe the community’s aspirations. This Plan is intended to implement Envision
Wheat Ridge and is in direct conformance with Envision Wheat Ridge. The URA
Plan directly supports five key values in Envision Wheat Ridge of economy and
land use, community character and design, transportation, community services,
and sustainable future. The following excerpts from Envision Wheat Ridge
highlight the linkage between Envision Wheat Ridge and this Plan under these five
key values. These are representative excerpts, and not an all-inclusive list of
relevant statements:
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
11
• Goal ELU 1 – Make Wheat Ridge a “community of choice” in which to
live, work, shop, and recreate
o Policy ELU 1.1 – Attract primary employers to attract strong
households
• Goal ELU 2 – Attract quality retail development and actively retain
existing retailers to locate in Wheat Ridge
o Policy ELU 2.1 – Retain and enhance existing retailers
o Policy ELU 2.3 – Rehabilitate underutilized retail spaces
• Goal ELU 3 – Retain and diversify local employment
o Policy ELU 3.2 – Generate new primary employment
• Goal ELU 4 – Increase the diversity of land uses
o Policy ELU 4.1 – Efficient use of limited land
• Goal ELU 5 – Revitalize key redevelopment areas, targeting areas
with immediate redevelopment needs with efforts that support and
promote investment and quality design, projecting a positive image for
the community and enhancing the surrounding context.
o ELU 5.2 – Infill and redevelopment
o ELU 5.3 – High quality redevelopment
• Goal CC 3 – Ensure quality design for development and
redevelopment.
o Policy CC 3.1 – Require new development and redevelopment to
exemplify high quality urban design to enhance the city’s character.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
12
• Goal T 1 – Provide an integrated transportation system to address all
modes of travel and future funding priorities.
o Policy T 1.1 – Focus future investment for infrastructure
improvements in targeted corridors and intersections
o Policy T 1.2 – Improvements funding
o Policy T 1.3 – Complete streets
• Goal T 3 – Increase transportation efficiency and options
o Policy T 3.2 – Expanded travel options
o Policy T 3.4 – Priority pedestrian and bicycle improvements
o Policy T 3.5 – Increase mobility
• Goal CS 2 – Continue to invest in parks, recreation, and open space.
o Policy CS 2.1 - Continue to maintain and enhance parks,
recreation, and open space offerings and facilities, while
periodically identifying future parkland needs.
• Goal SF 1 – Establish and maintain a resilient and sustainable tax
base that will be able to support community services.
o Policy SF 1.2 – Create a diverse and broader revenue base by
facilitating the development of local and regional retail and
employment and encouraging local shopping and dining.
• Goal SF 2 – Protect and preserve natural assets including its scenic
and environmental asses, the urban tree canopy, and drainage ways.
o Policy SF 2.1 – Provide stewardship of unique and sensitive
natural resources and areas.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
13
• Goal SF 4 – Maintain a healthy and active community and encourage
opportunities for lifelong activity and engagement.
o Policy SF 4.1 – Promote physical activity and increase recreational
opportunities, partly by developing pedestrian and bicycle
connections between neighborhoods and existing and proposed
community activity center and employment opportunities.
44th Avenue Subarea Plan
The City of Wheat Ridge 44th Avenue Subarea Plan identifies parcels in the Plan
Areas as high economic development opportunity, specifically the industrial node
in the northeast corner and commercial properties along 44th Avenue. These two
nodes are identified as potential catalyst sites based on economic and land use
metrics. The Clearvale URA Plan directly implements the 44th Avenue Subarea
Plan and the following excerpts are representative of the alignment between the
two.
Primary Corridor Investments – Strategies focused on large area and infill
developments, improvements to existing uses, and the pedestrian experience.
• Topic B: Existing uses and infill development – To enhance the existing
uses and provide new community needs through individual property
improvements, infill development, and strategic redevelopment.
o Strategy B-1: Small Business Focus – For the properties along West
44th Avenue east of Kipling Street it is important to focus on a variety of
small businesses and eclectic building forms. As the primary commercial
zone within the larger Subarea, new smaller-footprint, infill development
and existing property improvements should focus on retaining and
encouraging new local and/or small businesses to thrive.
o Strategy B-3: Site Improvements – Along the corridor general
investments and site enhancements should be encouraged and should be
made to existing properties in the area where feasible.
o Strategy B-4: Building Improvements – Many existing buildings may
benefit from both internal and external improvements to better serve the
needs of the owner, user, and passersby.
• Topic C: Pedestrian Experience – In addition to safety, walkability and
ease of access discussed under the Overall Connectivity Improvements (OCI),
the experience for a pedestrian along a major corridor should be memorable
and enjoyable, benefiting users of all ages and abilities.
o Strategy C-1: Family-Focused Activity Center – Rebranding of the
areas adjacent to the northern edge of Anderson Park as a family focused
recreation center, while still accommodating current uses that are less
aligned with that vision.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
14
o Strategy C-2: Corridor Adjacent Connectivity and Infrastructure –
Work with existing commercial property owners to identify primary, public-
facing nodes on private property and to encourage off corridor
connectivity.
o Strategy C-3: Streetscape Design – focused on the safety and quality
of the experience for non-motorists, as motorists generally operate with
minimal restrictions in this area.
Community Subarea Enhancements – Strategies focused on historic uses,
smaller-scale change, and redevelopment in support of larger community assets
and amenities
• Topic D: Historic Character – Reflects many long time uses, including
agriculture, employment, and open space that have made up the land-use
fabric of the area for many years.
o Strategy D-2: Employment Node – The northeast corner of the Subarea
currently contains numerous large footprint employment users. This node
should continue to serve its important employment role, evolving over
time to capture a larger mix of employment types, allowing new users and
development to better address community needs for small-scale and light
industrial uses, connectivity, and environmental sustainability.
Overall Connectivity Improvements – Strategies focused on addressing gaps
and barriers for additional north-south and east-west connectivity throughout the
Subarea to maximize the safety and comfort for all users
• Topic F: East/West Connectivity – With West 44th Avenue serving as the
only major east-west connection in the Subarea, it is essential to improve
multi-modal connectivity along the corridor as well as to the greater
community, regional networks, and major destinations in and around the
Subarea.
o Strategy F-1: West 44th Avenue Corridor Enhancements – Guide
investment into targeted enhancements and infrastructure changes along
the roadway to regulate traffic flow, increase pedestrian and bicycle
safety, and enhance the user experience.
o Strategy F-2: Neighborhood Connectivity – Provide new connectivity
options through new development specifically
• Topic G: North/South Connectivity – Kipling Street serves as the only
north/south connection, and north/south connectivity is challenging given the
interstate to the north and Clear Creek to the south. It is essential to increase
both access and safety to major destinations in and around Wheat Ridge.
o Strategy G-2: I-70 Bridges and Underpasses – Create safer crossings
across the interstate for non-vehicular uses, either integrated in existing
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
15
vehicular crossings, or through the creation of standalone pedestrian and
bicycle crossings.
• Topic H: Priority Crossings – Safe street crossings are an important
consideration throughout the Subarea, and additional improvements have
been considered as well.
o Strategy H-2: General Intersection Improvements – All crossings
should provide for safe movement along the corridor.
o Strategy H-3: 44th Avenue Bridget at Clear Creek – Address the
mobility concerns at this bridge for vehicles, and look at alternatives for
safer, more efficient crossings for pedestrians and cyclists.
Development Standards and Procedures
All development within the Plan Area shall conform to the City’s Land Use Code
and any site-specific City zoning regulations and policies that might impact
properties in the Plan Area, all as in effect and as may be amended. However, as
authorized by the Urban Renewal Law, the Authority may arrange with the City
for the planning, replanning, zoning or rezoning of any part of the Plan Area as
needed in connection with the urban renewal project described in this Plan.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
16
Authorized Urban Renewal Undertakings
and Activities
The Act allows for a wide range of activities to be used in the implementation of an
urban renewal plan. The Authority is authorized to provide both financial assistance
and improvements in partnership with property owners and other affected parties
in order to accomplish the objectives stated herein. Public private partnerships
and other forms of cooperative development, including Cooperation Agreements,
will be essential to the Authority’s strategy for preventing the spread of blight and
eliminating existing blighting conditions. Without limitation, undertakings and
activities of the Authority in the furtherance of this Plan as described as follows.
Undertakings and Activities to Remedy Blight
As described in Section 4 of this Plan, seven qualifying conditions of blight were
identified in the Study Area of which this Urban Renewal Areas is a part. Each of
the seven qualifying conditions was observed within the Urban Renewal Area.
Implementation of this Plan by providing urban renewal resources for public and
private improvements will remedy the conditions identified:
b. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout
The investment of streetscape and increased bicycle and pedestrian
pathways and connections throughout the Plan Area will create an
improved pedestrian environment.
c. Faulty lot layout
The redevelopment of the northeast corner of the Plan Area will
provide improved internal vehicular access and connectivity.
d. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions
The private investments and onsite redevelopment will eliminate the
vandalism/graffiti, presence of vagrants, and excessive litter.
Additionally, the private investment will provide new jobs and establish
an employment node.
e. Deterioration of site or other improvements
The development of the Plan Area will turn neglected properties into a
thriving employment center and commercial node with the necessary
site improvements.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
17
f. Unusual topography or inadequate public improvements or utilities
The overall redevelopment and investment in the Plan Area will
address the maintenance deficiencies and provide adequate
infrastructure.
h. Existence of conditions that endanger life or property
The redevelopment areas of the Plan Area in a flood hazard area will
meet the necessary standards and regulations for development to
occur.
k.5. The existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high
levels of municipal services or substantial physical underutilization
or vacancy of sites, buildings, or other improvements - Observed
The Plan Area is currently underutilized and includes vacant property.
Through private investment and support from the Authority, the Plan
Area will develop and redevelop into vibrant nodes and be fully
utilized.
Project Development Plan
The primary goal of this Plan is to eliminate the current conditions of blight in the
Urban Renewal Area and prevent those conditions from reoccurring. The
contemplated redevelopment of the Area is for use as industrial facilities;
provided however, the Authority is authorized to approve any uses for the Area
that eliminate blight and are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
applicable zoning, including, without limitation, mixed use development, including
residential, hotel, commercial, retail, office, industrial, cultural, and public uses.
Complete Public Improvements and Facilities
The Authority may undertake certain actions to make the Area more attractive for
private investment. The Authority may, or may cause others, including, without
limitation, one or more Districts to install, construct, and reconstruct any public
improvements, including, without limitation, parking facilities. The Authority may,
or may cause others to, demolish and clear buildings and existing improvements
for the purpose of promoting the objectives of the Plan and the Act. Additionally,
the Authority may, or may cause others to, install, construct and reconstruct any
other authorized improvements, including, without limitation, other authorized
undertakings or improvements for the purpose of promoting the objectives of this
Plan and the Act.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
18
Plan Modification
The Authority may propose, and City Council may make, modifications to this Plan
as may be necessary; provided, however, any modification of the Plan shall (a)
comply with the provisions of the Act, including C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9) § 31-25-
107(7); (b) not impair Available Revenues then-pledged by the Authority or the
ability of the Authority to pay any outstanding Bonds, including any reimbursement
obligations of the Authority; or (c) not impair the ability of the Authority or any
party to any then-existing agreement to fully perform their respective covenants
and duties under any such agreement. The Authority may, in specific cases, allow
non-substantive variations from the provisions of this Plan if it determines that a
literal enforcement or application of the provision would constitute an
unreasonable limitation beyond the intent and purpose stated herein.
Provide Relocation Assistance
While it is not anticipated as of the date of this Plan that acquisition of real
property will result in the relocation of any individuals, families, or business
concerns; if such relocation becomes necessary, the Authority will adopt a
relocation plan as necessary to comply with applicable provisions of the Act.
Demolition, Clear and Prepare Improvements
The Authority is authorized to demolish or cooperate with others to clear
buildings, structures, and other improvements within the Area in an effort to
advance projects deemed consistent with the vision stated herein. Such
demolition or site clearance is necessary to eliminate unhealthy, unsanitary, and
unsafe conditions; eliminate obsolete uses deemed detrimental to the public
welfare; remove and prevent the spread of blight; and facilitate redevelopment of
the Area by private enterprise.
Acquire and Dispose of Property
It is not expected that the Authority will be required to acquire property to carry
out the project. However, if the Authority determines such acquisition is necessary,
it is authorized to acquire any such property by negotiation or any other method,
including that the Authority is authorized to acquire property by eminent domain.
Properties acquired by the Authority by negotiation may be temporarily operated,
managed and maintained by the Authority if requested to do so by the acquiring
entity and deemed in the best interest of the Urban Renewal Project and the Plan.
Such property shall be under the management and control of the Authority and
may be rented or leased pending its disposition for redevelopment.
The Authority may sell, lease, or otherwise transfer real property or any interest
in real property subject to covenants, conditions and restrictions, including
architectural and design controls, time restrictions on development, and building
requirements in accordance with the Act and this Plan.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
19
Enter into Redevelopment/Development Agreements
The Authority may enter into Redevelopment/Development Agreements or other
contracts with developer(s) or property owners or other such individuals or entities
determined to be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan, including the
pledge by the Authority of Available Revenues to pay eligible costs pursuant to
the Act or any other applicable law. Further, such Redevelopment/Development
Agreements, or other contracts, may contain terms, provisions, activities, and
undertakings contemplated by this Plan and the Act. Any existing agreements
between the City and private parties that are consistent with this Plan are
intended to remain in full force and effect unless all parties to such agreements
agree otherwise.
Enter into Cooperation Agreements
The Authority is authorized to enter into such Cooperation Agreements as may be
required by the Act, including tax sharing agreements. The Authority may also
use the mediation and other provisions of the Act when necessary to provide
adequate financing to carry out this Plan. This paragraph shall not be construed to
require any particular form of cooperation.
Other Project Undertakings and Activities
Other project undertakings and activities deemed necessary by the Authority to
carry out the Plan may be undertaken and performed by the Authority or pursuant
to agreements with other parties or public bodies in accordance with the
authorization of the Act and any applicable law or laws.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
20
Project Financing
Financing Powers
Except as hereafter specifically provided, the undertakings and activities of the
urban renewal project described in this Plan may be financed, in whole or in part,
by the Authority to the full extent authorized under the TIF provisions of C.R.S. §
31-25-107(9)(a) in the Urban Renewal Law, as amended, and with any other
available sources of revenues and means of financing authorized to be undertaken
by the Authority pursuant to the Urban Renewal Law and under any other
applicable law, which shall include, without limitation:
• The collection and use of revenues from property tax increment, sales tax
increment, interest income, federal loans or grants, agreements with public,
quasi-public, or private parties and entities, loans or advances from any other
available source, and any other available sources of revenue.
• The issuance of bonds and other indebtedness, including, without limitation,
notes or any other financing instruments or documents in amounts sufficient
to finance all or part of the Plan. The borrowing of funds and creation of other
indebtedness.
• The use of any and all financing methods legally available to the City, the
Authority, any private developer, redeveloper, or owner to finance in whole or
in part any and all costs, including without limitation the cost of public
improvements, described or anticipated in the Plan or in any manner related
or incidental to the development of the Plan Area. Such methods may be
combined to finance all or part of activities and undertakings throughout the
Plan Area.
• The principal, interest, any premiums and any other amounts legally due on or
in connection with any indebtedness or obligation of the Authority may be paid
from property tax increments, sales tax increments or any other funds,
revenues, assets or property legally available to the Authority.
This Plan contemplates, however, that the primary method of assisting with
financing eligible expenses in the Plan Area will be through the use of revenues
generated by Property Tax Increment and Sales Tax Increment. It is the intent of
the City Council in approving this Plan to authorize the use of TIF by the Authority
as part of its efforts to advance the vision, objectives, and activities described
herein.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
21
Tax Increment Financing District
Pursuant to the provisions of C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9) of the Urban Renewal Law, in
approving this Plan, the City Council hereby approves the Plan Area as a single tax
increment financing district with the same boundary as the Plan Area (the “TIF
District”). The boundaries of this TIF District shall therefore be as depicted in
Figure 1 and described on Exhibit A.
Property Tax Increment Financing
The Authority is specifically authorized to collect and expend property tax
increment revenue to the full extent authorized by the Urban Renewal Law and to
use that revenue for all purposes authorized under this Plan.
Property Tax Increment Limitations
The Authority shall establish a fund for the financing authorized under this Plan
that shall be funded with the property tax allocation authorized to the Authority
under the Urban Renewal Law in C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9). Under this method, the
property taxes of specifically designated public bodies, if any, levied after the
effective date of the approval of this Plan upon taxable property in the Plan Area
each year by or for the benefit of the designated public body must be divided for
a period not to exceed twenty-five (25) years after the effective date of the
adoption of the tax allocation provision, as follows:
Base Amount – That portion of the taxes that are produced by the levy at the
rate fixed each year by or for such public body upon the valuation for assessment
of taxable property in the Plan Area last certified prior to the effective date of
approval of the Plan or, as to an area later added to the Plan Area, the effective
date of the modification of the Plan, shall be paid into the funds of each such
public body as are all other taxes collected by or for said public body.
Increment Amount – That portion of said property taxes in excess of such base
amount must be allocated to and, when collected, paid into a special fund of the
Authority to pay the principal of, the interest on, and any premiums due in
connection with the bonds of, loans or advances to, or indebtedness incurred by,
whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise, the Authority for financing or
refinancing, in whole or in part, a specific project. Any excess property tax
collections not allocated in this way must be paid into the funds of the
municipality or other taxing entity, as applicable.
Unless and until the total valuation for assessment of the taxable property in the
Plan Area exceeds the base valuation for assessment of the taxable property in
the Plan Area, all of the taxes levied upon the taxable property in the Plan Area
must be paid into the funds of the respective public bodies.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
22
When such bonds, loans, advances, and indebtedness, if any, including interest
thereon and any premiums due in connection therewith, have been paid, all taxes
upon the taxable property in the Plan Area must be paid into the funds of the
respective public bodies, and all moneys remaining in the special fund that have
not previously been rebated and that originated as property tax increment
generated based on the mill levy of a taxing body, other than the City, within the
boundaries of the Plan Area must be repaid to each taxing body based on the pro
rata share of the prior year’s property tax increment attributable to each taxing
body’s current mill levy in which property taxes were divided. Any moneys
remaining in the special fund not generated by property tax increment are
excluded from any such repayment requirement. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, revenues excluded by C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9)(a)(II) of the Act
are not intended to be included in Available Property Tax Increment Revenues.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any additional revenues the City,
county, special district, or school district receives either because the voters have
authorized the City, county, special district, or school district to retain and spend
said moneys pursuant to section 20(7)(d) of Article X of the Colorado Constitution
subsequent to the creation of this special fund or as a result of an increase in the
property tax mill levy approved by the voters of the City, county, special district,
or school district subsequent to the creation of the special fund, to the extent the
total mill levy of the City, county, special district, or school district exceeds the
respective mill levy in effect at the time of approval or substantial modification of
the Plan, are not included in the amount of the increment that is allocated to and,
when collected, paid into the special fund of the authority.
In calculating and making these payments, the County Treasurer may offset the
Authority’s pro rata portion of any property taxes that are paid to the Authority
under these terms and that are subsequently refunded to the taxpayer against
any subsequent payments due to the Authority for an urban renewal project. The
Authority shall make adequate provision for the return of overpayments in the
event that there are not sufficient property taxes due to the Authority to offset
the Authority’s pro rata portion of the refunds. The Authority may establish a
reserve fund for this purpose or enter into an intergovernmental agreement with
the municipal governing body in which the municipality assumes responsibility for
the return of the overpayments.
The portion of taxes collected may be irrevocably pledged by the Authority for the
payment of the principal of, the interest on, and any premiums due in connection
with such bonds, loans, advances, and indebtedness. This irrevocable pledge shall
not extend to any taxes that are placed in a reserve fund to be returned to the
county for refunds of overpayments by taxpayers or any reserve funds reserved
by the Authority for such purposes in accordance with C.R.S. § 31-25-
107(9)(a)(III) and (b). The Authority shall set aside and reserve a reasonable
amount as determined by the Authority of all incremental taxes paid to the
Authority for payment of expenses associated with administering the Plan.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
23
At the time of general reassessment of taxable property valuations in Jefferson
County, including all or part of the Plan Area subject to division of valuation for
assessment between base and increment, as provided above, the portions of
valuations for assessment to be allocated as provided above shall be
proportionately adjusted in accordance with such reassessment or change. Note
that at the time of this Plan adoption, such a general reassessment occurs every
two years, in the odd-numbered years.
Sales Tax Increment Financing
The urban renewal project under the Plan may also be financed by the Authority
under the sales tax allocation financing provisions of the Urban Renewal Law in
C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9). The Urban Renewal Law allows that upon the adoption or
amendment of an Urban Renewal Plan, sales taxes flowing to the city and/or
county may be “frozen” at their current level. The current level is established
based on the previous 12 months prior to the adoption of this Plan. Thereafter,
the jurisdiction can continue to receive this fixed sales tax revenue. The Authority
thereafter may receive all, or an agreed upon portion of the additional sales taxes
(the increment) that are generated above the base. The Authority may use these
incremental revenues to finance the issuance of bonds, reimburse developers for
public improvement costs, reimburse the city for public improvement costs, and
pay off financial obligations and other debts incurred in the administration of the
Plan. This increment is not an additional sales tax, but rather is a portion of the
established tax collected by the jurisdiction, and the sales tax increment resulting
from redevelopment efforts and activities contemplated in this Plan.
Sales Tax Increment Limitations
A fund for financing projects may be accrued and used by the Authority under the
tax allocation financing provisions of the Urban Renewal Law. Under this method,
municipal sales taxes collected within the Plan Area, by or for the benefit of the
designated public body must be divided for a period not to exceed twenty-five
(25) years after the effective date of the adoption of the tax allocation provision,
as follows:
Base Amount – That portion of sales taxes, not including any sales taxes for
remote sales as specified in C.R.S. § 39-26-104 (2), collected within the boundaries
of the Plan Area in the twelve-month period ending on the last day of the month
prior to the effective date of approval of the Plan, shall be paid into the funds of
each such public body as are all other taxes collected by or for said public body.
Increment Amount – All or any portion of said sales taxes in excess of such
base amount, must be allocated to and, when collected, paid into a special fund of
the Authority to pay the principal of, the interest on, and any premiums due in
connection with the bonds of, loans or advances to, or indebtedness incurred by,
whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise, the Authority for financing or
refinancing, in whole or in part, a specific project. Any excess sales tax collections
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
24
not allocated in this way must be paid into the funds of the jurisdiction, as
applicable.
Unless and until the total sales tax collections in the Plan Area exceed the base
year sales tax collections in the Plan Area, all such sales tax collections must be
paid into the funds of the respective taxing entity.
The portion of taxes collected may be irrevocably pledged by the Authority for the
payment of the principal of, the interest on, and any premiums due in connection
with such bonds, loans, advances, and indebtedness. This irrevocable pledge shall
not extend to any taxes that are placed in a reserve fund to be returned to the
county for refunds of overpayments by taxpayers or any reserve funds reserved
by the Authority for such purposes in accordance with C.R.S. § 31-25-
107(9)(a)(III) and (b). The Authority shall set aside and reserve a reasonable
amount as determined by the Authority of all incremental taxes paid to the
Authority for payment of expenses associated with administering the Plan.
Tax Increment Reimbursements
Tax increment revenues may be used to reimburse the city and/or a developer for
costs incurred for improvements related to a project to pay the debt incurred by the
Authority with such entities for urban renewal activities and purposes. Tax increment
revenues may also be used to pay bonded indebtedness, financial obligations, and
debts of the Authority related to urban renewal activities under this Plan.
Within the 12-month period prior to the effective date of the approval or
modification of the Plan requiring the allocation of moneys to the Authority as
outlined previously, the city, county, special district, or school district is entitled to
the reimbursement of any moneys that such city, county, special district, or
school district pays to, contributes to, or invests in the Authority for a project. The
reimbursement is to be paid from the special fund of the Authority.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
25
Severability and Reasonable Variations
The Authority shall have the ability to approve reasonable variations (as
determined by the Board) from the strict application of these Plan provisions, so
long as such variations reasonably accommodate the intent and purpose of this
Plan and the Urban Renewal Law. Plan provisions may be altered by market
conditions, redevelopment opportunities and/or the needs of the community
affected by the Plan.
If any portion of this Plan is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity
will not affect the remaining portions of the Plan.
Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan
26
Effective Date of the Plan
This Plan shall be effective upon its final approval by the City Council. Except as
otherwise permitted under the Urban Renewal Law, the term of the TIF period is
twenty-five (25) years from the effective date of the Plan, unless the Authority
deems, to the extent consistent with the terms in the applicable, agreements,
including, without, limitation, Redevelopment/Development Agreements and
Cooperation Agreements, that all activities to accomplish the Project have been
completed and all debts incurred to finance such activities and all expenses of the
Authority have been repaid. In that event, the Authority may declare the Plan
fully implemented.
Exhibit A: Legal Description
Matrix Design Group, Inc.
707 17TH, Suite 3150
Denver, CO 80202
O 303.572.0200
F 303.572.0202
matrixdesigngroup.com
SHEET 1 OF 8
EXHIBIT A
LAND DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO; BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS WITH BEARINGS REFERENCED TO THE
WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GARRISON STREET, ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 00°34’24” WEST;
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGH-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 70 WITH THE WEST RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF GARISSON STREET;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING EIGHT (8) COURSES:
1. THENCE SOUTH 73°11'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 34.78 FEET;
2. THENCE NORTH 87°28'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 29.93 FEET;
3. THENCE NORTH 89°41'37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,162.43 FEET;
4. THENCE NORTH 79°55'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 117.33 FEET;
5. THENCE NORTH 88°59'55" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 73.81 FEET;
6. THENCE NORTH 82°56'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 315.78 FEET;
7. THENCE NORTH 82°43'16" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.22 FEET;
8. THENCE NORTH 73°15'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,100.38 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02°23'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 231.43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE
OF SAID INTERSTATE 70;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES:
1. THENCE NORTH 72°17'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 548.10 FEET;
2. THENCE NORTH 89°58'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 109.22 FEET;
3. THENCE SOUTH 53°57'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 117.91 FEET;
4. THENCE SOUTH 47°23'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 250.46 FEET;
5. THENCE NORTH 76°00'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 370.39 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41°50'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 85.40 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°14'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 499.89 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 78°20'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.67 FEET;
SHEET 2 OF 8
THENCE NORTH 00°10'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 69°09'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 175.87 FEET ;
THENCE SOUTH 78°08'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 88.33 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY OF
JOHNSON HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY UNDER
RECEPTION NUMBER 45377975;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH SAID EXTERIOR BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES;
1. THENCE NORTH 00°10'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 116.18 FEET;
2. THENCE SOUTH 78°26'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 593.33 FEET;
3. THENCE SOUTH 49°32'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 167.00 FEET;
4. THENCE SOUTH 18°59'17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 207.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY
OF HILLCREST HEIGHTS, AS RECORDED IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY UNDER
RECEPTION NUMBER 46389909;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH SAID EXTERIOR BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES;
1. THENCE SOUTH 89°32'24" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 251.55 FEET;
2. THENCE SOUTH 00°10'17" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 157.28 FEET;
3. THENCE SOUTH 85°50'52" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 498.01 FEET;
4. THENCE SOUTH 05°01'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 104.86 FEET;
5. THENCE SOUTH 53°27'55" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 66.00 FEET;
6. THENCE NORTH 80°24'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 131.28 FEET;
7. THENCE SOUTH 38°40'14" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 452.05 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY
OF KENRIDGE SUDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY IN BOOK
13 AT PAGE 20;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH SAID EXTERIOR BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING TWENTY-TWO (22) COURSES;
1. THENCE SOUTH 88°50'31" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 33.64 FEET;
2. THENCE SOUTH 45°05'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 174.98 FEET;
3. THENCE SOUTH 50°09'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 107.99 FEET;
4. THENCE NORTH 41°38'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 57.44 FEET;
5. THENCE SOUTH 50°15'24" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111.83 FEET;
6. THENCE SOUTH 40°00'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 98.60 FEET;
SHEET 3 OF 8
7. THENCE SOUTH 52°29'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 80.63 FEET;
8. THENCE SOUTH 55°37'28" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 8.09 FEET;
9. THENCE SOUTH 43°21'43" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 53.19 FEET;
10. THENCE SOUTH 51°56'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.11 FEET;
11. THENCE SOUTH 39°50'31" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.11 FEET;
12. THENCE SOUTH 40°35'49" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 69.35 FEET;
13. THENCE SOUTH 50°46'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 27.96 FEET;
14. THENCE NORTH 26°14'08" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 58.34 FEET;
15. THENCE SOUTH 58°30'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 48.41 FEET;
16. THENCE SOUTH 76°10'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 71.18 FEET;
17. THENCE SOUTH 57°44'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 71.76 FEET;
18. THENCE SOUTH 57°44'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 76.59 FEET;
19. THENCE SOUTH 19°01'48" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 17.05 FEET;
20. THENCE SOUTH 53°44'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 76.46 FEET;
21. THENCE SOUTH 17°18'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.79 FEET;
22. THENCE SOUTH 89°21'17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 29.31 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°13'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 52.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39°01'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 144.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 15°00'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 107.47 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 55°48'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.10 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 64°30'26" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 62.02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 64°06'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 95.10 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75°03'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 63.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 40°14'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 57.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY LINE OF
CRESTVIEW HEIGHTS, AS RECORDED IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT RECEPTION
NUMBER 61859471;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH SAID EXTERIOR BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING FIVE (6) COURSES:
SHEET 4 OF 8
1. THENCE SOUTH 68°03'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 110.67 FEET;
2. THENCE SOUTH 62°35'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 84.34 FEET;
3. THENCE SOUTH 14°38'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 304.89 FEET;
4. THENCE SOUTH 74°00'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 114.91 FEET TO A TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS
OF 54.87 FEET, WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 15°59'14" EAST;
5. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AND COINCIDENT WITH SAID TANGENT CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 53°24'27", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 51.15 FEET AND HAVING A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 47°18'32"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.31 FEET;
6. THENCE ALONG A LINE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 20°36'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 223.85
FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF W 44TH AVENUE;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING THIRTEEN (13) COURSES:
1. THENCE NORTH 69°26'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 267.54 FEET;
2. THENCE NORTH 68°20'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 119.30 FEET;
3. THENCE NORTH 72°16'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 169.86 FEET;
4. THENCE NORTH 67°57'08" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 51.84 FEET;
5. THENCE NORTH 69°02'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 52.06 FEET;
6. THENCE NORTH 70°00'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 52.31 FEET;
7. THENCE NORTH 72°19'24" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 51.34 FEET;
8. THENCE NORTH 74°38'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 52.30 FEET;
9. THENCE NORTH 77°02'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 51.52 FEET;
10. THENCE NORTH 75°15'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.53 FEET;
11. THENCE SOUTH 89°41'23" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 515.41 FEET;
12. THENCE SOUTH 00°13'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 7.53 FEET;
13. THENCE SOUTH 89°33'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 27.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF
WAY LINE OF GARRISON STREET;
THENCE NORTH 00°12'53" EAST, COINCIDENT WITH SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 552.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°34'24" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,691.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY AND ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS THAT FALL WITHIN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IN
THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY;
SHEET 5 OF 8
CARNATION GARDENS, RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 90399762, CLEARVALE SUBDIVISION, RECORDED
UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 55623380, GARRISON VILLAGE CONDOMINIUMS, RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION
NUMBER F2087928, NORTH GREEN VALLY SUBDIVISION, RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION N UMBER 61886157,
RICE’S MINOR SUBDIVISION, RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 80017735, WOODBINE SUBDIVISION,
RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 60814784, TROUT SUBDIVISION, RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER
54574734, WILLIAMS SUBDIVISION, RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 47426216, HABITAT ON CARR STREET
FILING NO. 1, RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 2005087628, KINGSBROOKE CONDOMINIUMS, RECORDED
UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 79053453, EVERETT GREEN CONDOS RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER
79038847, AND PARKSIDE TOWNHOMES AT CLEAR CREEK CONDOS RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER
2006035553.
THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION CONTAINS A CALCULATED AREA OF 4,864,468 SQUARE FEET OR (111.67281 ACRES),
MORE OR LESS, AND IS DEPICTED ON THE ATTACHED GRAPHICAL EXHIBIT FOR REFERENCE.
JERRY R. BESSIE, PLS 38576
PREPARED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MATRIX DESIGN GROUP
7107 17TH STREET, SUITE 3150 – DENVER, COLORADO 80202
CA
R
R
S
T
CA
R
R
S
T
CO
D
Y
S
T
DO
V
E
R
S
T
DU
D
L
E
Y
S
T
ES
T
E
S
S
T
A
EV
E
R
E
T
T
C
T
FI
E
L
D
S
T
FL
O
W
E
R
S
T
GA
R
I
S
S
O
N
S
T
FI
E
L
D
C
T
FL
O
W
E
R
C
T
ES
T
E
S
S
T
DO
V
E
R
S
T
I-70
W 45TH AVE
W 44TH
W 45TH PL
W 46
T
H
A
V
E
W 46TH PL
FL
O
W
E
R
S
T
FI
E
L
D
S
T
EV
E
R
E
T
T
C
T
EV
E
R
E
T
T
S
T
W 4
4
T
H
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
:
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
6
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
:
B
C
E
F G H I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
D
Q
R
STU
V
WXYZ
AA
BB
QQ
NNOO
PP
RR
SS
TT
UU
L1
L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7
L8
L35
L36
L37
L38
L39
L40
L41
L42L43
L44
L45
L46
L47
L48
L49
L50L51L52
L
5
3
L54
L55
L56
L57L58
L60
L
6
1
L62
L6
3
L64
L65
L66
L67
L68
L69
L70L71
L72
L73
L74
L75
BA
S
I
S
O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
S
N0
°
3
4
'
2
4
"
W
1
6
9
1
.
7
0
'
R=54.87'
Δ=53°24'27"
L=51.15'
CH=S47°18'32"W
49.32'
L7
6
L59
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
R:
\
2
3
.
6
3
6
.
0
0
6
-
U
R
A
W
H
E
A
T
R
I
D
G
E
C
A
R
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
\
4
0
0
S
u
r
v
e
y
\
4
0
0
C
A
D
D
\
4
0
7
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
\
6
3
6
.
0
0
6
-
S
U
R
V
-
C
A
R
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
-
G
R
2
.
d
w
g
PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY: JRB
SCALE: 1"=500'
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023 SHEET: OF 8
EXHIBIT A
LAND DESCRIPTION
CONTAINS 4,864,468 SQ. FT. (111.67281 ACRES, MORE OR LESS)
5
POINT OF
BEGINNING
I-70
48TH
AL
L
I
S
O
N
S
T
WA
D
S
W
O
R
T
H
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
YU
K
O
N
S
T
YA
R
R
O
W
S
T
ZE
P
H
Y
R
S
T
AL
L
I
S
O
N
S
T
BA
L
S
A
M
S
T
JOHNSON COURT
W 47TH AVE
W 46TH AVE
SOU
T
H
B
A
N
K
CLE
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
6
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
:
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
5
DD
EE
FF
GG
HH
II
JJ
JJ
KK
LL
MM
L9 L
1
0 L11
L12 L
1
3
L
1
4
L15 L
1
6
L1
7
L18
L19
L20
L21L22L23L24
L2
5
L26
L2
7
L28
L29L30
L31
L32
L33
L34
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
R:
\
2
3
.
6
3
6
.
0
0
6
-
U
R
A
W
H
E
A
T
R
I
D
G
E
C
A
R
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
\
4
0
0
S
u
r
v
e
y
\
4
0
0
C
A
D
D
\
4
0
7
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
\
6
3
6
.
0
0
6
-
S
U
R
V
-
C
A
R
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
-
G
R
2
.
d
w
g
PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY: JRB
SCALE: 1"=500'
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023 SHEET: OF 8
EXHIBIT A
LAND DESCRIPTION
6
CONTAINS 4,864,468 SQ. FT. (111.67281 ACRES, MORE OR LESS)
PARCEL TABLE
PARCEL DESCRIPTION REC. NO.
A CARNATION GARDENS 90399762
B CLEARVALE SUBDIVISION 55623380
C CRESTVIEW HEIGHTS BK. 22 PG. 7
D KENRIDGE SUBDIVISION BK. 13 PG. 30
E GARRISON VILLAGE CONDOMINIUMS F2087928
F GARRISON 70 SUBDIVISION 71433718
G SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 92034637
H WARRANTY DEED 79039894
I PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION 58714163
J WARRANTY DEED 86059087
K SIERRA LAND FILING NO. 1 83008547
L NORTH GREEN VALLEY SUBDIVISION 61886157
M RICE'S MINOR SUBDIVISION 80017735
N QUIT CLAIM DEED 87117854
O SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED F0016883
P QUIT CLAIM DEED 82058005
Q QUIT CLAIM DEED 24390304
R WARRANTY DEED 90061134
S D T I SUBDIVISION 2008059166
T SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED F1362131
U SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 90062815
V CRESTVIEW PARK AMENDMENT 2006086667
W WARRANTY DEED 90061134
X WARRANTY DEED F0084414
Y QUIT CLAIM DEED 87092648
Z QUIT CLAIM DEED 88001043
AA HAPPY VALLEY GARDENS 29420861
BB JUCHEM GARDEN PLACE 85021027
CC SUN VALLEY 84041507
DD QUIT CLAIM DEED 87117855
EE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED F0075160
FF WEST I-70 BUSINESS CENTER SUB 92003297
GG WHEATRIDGE INDUSTRIAL PARK 450011
HH QUIT CLAIM DEED 26000528
II WARRANTY DEED 92092987
JJ SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 92034637
KK WARRANTY DEED 11260452
LL JOHNSON HEIGHTS 45377975
MM PLAT OF HILLCREST HEIGHTS 46389909
NN WOODBINE SUBDIVISION 60814784
OO TROUT SUBDIVISION 54574734
PP WILLIAMS SUBDIVISION 47426216
QQ SUN VALLEY SUBDIVISION BK. 13 PG. 14
RR HABITAT ON CARR STREET FILING NO. 1 2005087628
SS KINGSBROOKE CONDOMINIUMS 79053452
TT EVERETT GREEN CONDOMINIUMS 79038846
UU PARKSIDE TOWNHOMES AT CLEAR CREEK CONDOS 2006035553
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
R:
\
2
3
.
6
3
6
.
0
0
6
-
U
R
A
W
H
E
A
T
R
I
D
G
E
C
A
R
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
\
4
0
0
S
u
r
v
e
y
\
4
0
0
C
A
D
D
\
4
0
7
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
\
6
3
6
.
0
0
6
-
S
U
R
V
-
C
A
R
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
-
G
R
2
.
d
w
g
PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY: JRB
SCALE: 1"=500'
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023 SHEET: OF 8
EXHIBIT A
LAND DESCRIPTION
7
LINE TABLE
LINE #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22
L23
L24
L25
L26
L27
L28
L29
L30
BEARING
S73°11'09"E
N87°28'21"E
N89°41'37"E
N79°55'21"E
N88°59'55"E
N82°56'39"E
N82°43'16"E
N73°15'58"E
N73°15'58"E
S02°23'50"E
N72°17'56"E
N89°58'25"E
S53°57'22"E
S47°23'24"E
N76°00'44"E
S41°50'29"E
S00°14'36"E
S78°20'20"W
N00°10'48"W
S69°09'20"W
S78°08'58"W
N00°10'22"W
S78°26'06"W
S49°32'03"W
S18°59'17"W
S89°32'24"W
S00°10'17"E
S85°50'52"W
S05°01'01"E
S53°27'55"W
DISTANCE
34.78
29.93
2162.43
117.33
73.81
315.78
199.22
1100.38
1100.38
231.43
548.10
109.22
117.91
250.46
370.39
85.40
499.89
40.67
28.63
175.87
88.33
116.18
593.33
167.00
207.70
251.55
157.28
498.01
104.86
66.00
LINE TABLE
LINE #
L31
L32
L33
L34
L35
L36
L37
L38
L39
L40
L41
L42
L43
L44
L45
L46
L47
L48
L49
L50
L51
L52
L53
L54
L55
L56
L57
L58
L59
L60
BEARING
N80°24'20"W
S38°40'14"W
S88°50'31"W
S45°05'50"W
S50°09'01"W
N41°38'00"W
S50°15'24"W
S40°00'34"W
S52°29'50"E
S43°21'43"W
S51°56'44"W
S40°35'49"W
S50°46'35"W
N26°14'08"W
S58°30'22"W
S76°10'29"W
S57°44'30"W
S19°01'48"E
S53°44'25"W
S17°18'35"E
S89°21'17"W
N00°13'41"E
N39°01'13"W
N15°00'50"E
S55°48'46"W
S64°06'06"W
S75°03'39"W
N40°14'09"W
S68°03'48"W
S62°35'25"W
DISTANCE
131.28
452.05
33.64
174.98
107.99
57.44
111.83
98.60
80.63
53.19
50.11
69.35
27.96
58.34
48.41
71.18
76.59
17.05
76.46
10.79
29.31
52.73
144.78
107.47
91.10
95.10
63.38
57.47
110.67
84.34
LINE TABLE
LINE #
L61
L62
L63
L64
L65
L66
L67
L68
L69
L70
L71
L72
L73
L74
L75
L76
BEARING
S14°38'18"E
S74°00'46"W
S20°36'40"W
N69°26'39"W
N68°20'32"W
N72°16'47"W
N67°57'08"W
N70°00'48"W
N72°19'24"W
N74°38'35"W
N77°02'05"W
N75°15'22"W
S89°41'23"W
S00°13'47"E
S89°33'58"W
N00°12'53"E
DISTANCE
304.89
114.91
223.85
267.54
119.30
169.86
51.84
52.31
51.34
52.30
51.52
101.53
515.41
7.53
27.36
552.05
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
R:
\
2
3
.
6
3
6
.
0
0
6
-
U
R
A
W
H
E
A
T
R
I
D
G
E
C
A
R
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
\
4
0
0
S
u
r
v
e
y
\
4
0
0
C
A
D
D
\
4
0
7
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
\
6
3
6
.
0
0
6
-
S
U
R
V
-
C
A
R
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
-
G
R
2
.
d
w
g
PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY: JRB
SCALE: 1"=500'
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023 SHEET: OF 8
EXHIBIT A
LAND DESCRIPTION
8
Clearvale Existing Conditions
Survey
Prepared for:
Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority dba Renewal Wheat Ridge
and the City of Wheat Ridge
Prepared by:
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
August 29, 2023
EPS #233048
ATTACHMENT 3
Table of Contents
1.Introduction ............................................................................................. 1
Purpose ....................................................................................................... 1
Colorado Urban Renewal Law .......................................................................... 1
Methodology ................................................................................................ 4
2.Study Area Analysis .................................................................................. 5
Study Area ................................................................................................... 5
Field Survey Approach ................................................................................... 7
Blight Factor Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................... 8
Results of Field Survey ................................................................................ 10
3.Conclusions ............................................................................................ 27
List of Tables
Table 1. Parcels Contained in the Study Area ........................................................ 6
Table 2. Blight Conditions in Study Area ............................................................. 11
List of Figures
Figure 1. Clearvale Proposed Urban Renewal Boundary and Parcels ........................... 7
Figure 2. Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Vehicles ..................................... 12
Figure 3. Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Pedestrians ................................ 13
Figure 4. Poor Internal Vehicular or Pedestrian Circulation ...................................... 14
Figure 5. Poor Vehicular Access .......................................................................... 15
Figure 6. Floodplain or Flood Prone Areas ............................................................ 16
Figure 7. Vandalism/Graffiti ............................................................................... 17
Figure 8. Excessive Litter and Evidence of Vagrants............................................... 18
Figure 9. Open/Unenclosed Trash Dumpster ......................................................... 19
Figure 10. Maintenance Deficiencies ..................................................................... 20
Figure 11. Deteriorated Signage ........................................................................... 20
Figure 12. Deteriorated Fences ............................................................................ 21
Figure 13. Deteriorated On-site Parking Surfaces, and Curb and Gutter ..................... 21
Figure 14. Unpaved Parking Lot ........................................................................... 22
Figure 15. Deteriorated Pavement and Curbs ......................................................... 23
Figure 16. Lack of Pavement, Curbs, and Sidewalks ................................................ 24
Figure 17. Presence of Overhead Utilities and Billboards .......................................... 25
Figure 18. Underdeveloped in a Generally Urbanized Area ........................................ 26
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
233048-Draft Report_Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey.docx 1
1. Introduction
In August 2023, Economic & Planning Systems (EPS), working with the City of
Wheat Ridge, conducted the following existing conditions survey (Survey) of the
proposed Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Plan Area known as the Clearvale Urban
Renewal Area (Study Area). This proposed plan area is located at the intersection
of Carr Street and I-70 and consists of approximately 109 acres. The Study Area
is bound by West I-70 Frontage Road North to the north, West 44th Avenue to the
south, Garison Street to the west, and Wadsworth Boulevard and Clear Creek to
the east, as shown in Figure 1 on page 7.
Purpose
The primary purpose of this Survey is to determine whether the Study Area
qualifies as a “blighted area” within the meaning of Colorado Urban Renewal Law.
Secondly, this Survey will influence whether the Study Area should be
recommended to be established as an urban renewal plan area for such urban
renewal activities, as the City Council and the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal
Authority dba Renewal Wheat Ridge (URA) deem appropriate.
Colorado Urban Renewal Law
The requirements for the establishment of an urban renewal plan are outlined in
the Colorado Urban Renewal Law, Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) § 31‐25‐101
et seq. In order to establish an area for urban renewal, there are an array of
conditions that must be documented to establish a condition of blight. The
determination that constitutes a blighted area depends upon the presence of
several physical, environmental, and social factors. Blight is attributable to a
multiplicity of conditions which, in combination, tend to accelerate the
phenomenon of deterioration of an area and prevent new development from
occurring.
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
2
Urban Renewal Law
Blight Factors (C.R.S. § 31-25-103)
“’Blighted area’ means an area that, in its present condition and use and, by reason of the
presence of at least four of the following factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound
growth of the municipality, retards the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes
an economic or social liability, and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare:
(a) Slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures;
(b) Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout;
(c) Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness;
(d) Unsanitary or unsafe conditions;
(e) Deterioration of site or other improvements;
(f) Unusual topography or inadequate public improvements or utilities;
(g) Defective or unusual conditions of title rendering the title nonmarketable;
(h) The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other causes;
(I) Buildings that are unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work in because of building
code violations, dilapidation, deterioration, defective design, physical construction, or faulty or
inadequate facilities;
(j) Environmental contamination of buildings or property;
(k.5) The existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high levels of municipal
services or substantial physical underutilization or vacancy of sites, buildings, or other
improvements; or
(l) If there is no objection by the property owner or owners and the tenant or tenants of such
owner or owners, if any, to the inclusion of such property in an urban renewal area, “blighted
area” also means an area that, in its present condition and use and, by reason of the
presence of any one of the factors specified in paragraphs (a) to (k.5) of this subsection (2),
substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the municipality, retards the provision of
housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability, and is a menace to
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. For purposes of this paragraph (l), the fact that
an owner of an interest in such property does not object to the inclusion of such property in
the urban renewal area does not mean that the owner has waived any rights of such owner in
connection with laws governing condemnation.”
Use of Eminent Domain
In order for an Urban Renewal Authority to use the powers of eminent domain to acquire
properties, 5 of the 11 blight factors must be present (C.R.S. § 31‐25‐105.5(a)).
“’Blighted area’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in section 31‐25‐103 (2); except
that, for the purposes of this section only, “blighted area” means an area that, in its present
condition and use and, by reason of the presence of at least five of the factors specified in
section 31‐25‐103 (2)(a) to (2)(l), substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the
municipality, retards the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or
social liability, and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare.”
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
3
Urban Renewal Case Law
In addition to the State statute, several principles have been developed by
Colorado courts to guide the determination of whether an area constitutes a
blighted area under the Urban Renewal Law. The following parameters have
been established through case law for determining blight and the role of
judiciary review.
Tracy v. City of Boulder (Colo. Ct. App. 1981)
• Upheld the definition of blight presented in the Urban Renewal Law as a
broad condition encompassing not only those areas containing properties
so dilapidated as to justify condemnation as nuisances, but also envisioning
the prevention of deterioration. Therefore, the existence of widespread
nuisance violations and building condemnation is not required to designate
an area blighted.
• Additionally, the determination of blight is the responsibility of the
legislative body and a court’s role in review is to verify if the conclusion is
based upon factual evidence determined by the City Council at the time of
a public hearing to be consistent with the statutory definition.
Interstate Trust Building Co. v. Denver Urban Renewal Authority (Colo. 1970)
• Determined that blight assessment is not on a building-to-building basis
but is based on conditions observed throughout the plan area as a whole.
The presence of one well maintained building does not defeat a
determination that an area constitutes a blighted area.
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
4
Methodology
This Survey was completed by EPS to inventory and establish the existing
conditions within the Study Area through data gathering and field observations of
physical conditions. The Study Area was defined by the URA to encompass 28
parcels located in Wheat Ridge, between West I-70 Frontage Road North, West
44th Avenue, Garison Street, Wadsworth Boulevard, and Clear Creek. An inventory
of parcels within the Study Area was compiled using parcel data from the
Jefferson County Assessor, documenting parcel ownership, size, use, vacancy,
and assessed value.
The field survey was conducted by EPS in August 2023. The 11 factors of blight in
the state statute were broken down into “conditions” - existing situations or
circumstances identified in the Study Area that may qualify as blight under each
of the 11 factors. To meet the test stipulated by the state statutes, the City must
find a minimum of four conditions within the proposed plan area. The conditions
documented in this report are submitted as evidence to support a “finding of
blight” according to Urban Renewal Law. Under the Urban Renewal Law, the final
determination of blight within the Study Area is within the sole discretion of the
Wheat Ridge City Council.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
233048-Draft Report_Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey.docx 5
2. Study Area Analysis
Study Area
The proposed Clearvale Urban Renewal Plan Area is comprised of 28 parcels and
adjacent right-of-way (ROW) on approximately 109 acres of land, as shown in
Table 1 and Figure 1. The Study Area is bound by West I-70 Frontage Road
North to the north, West 44th Avenue to the south, Garison Street to the west,
and Wadsworth Boulevard and Clear Creek to the east. Parcels in the Study Area
are owned by 15 individual owners including multiple parcels owned by the City of
Wheat Ridge, Arvex Properties Inc., Wheat Ridge Industrial Park LLC, Triad Real
Estate, and Exchange 8150 West 48th Ave LLC.
The parcels within the Study Area are a combination of older commercial
development, open space, vacant land, water, and ROW as shown below. There is
a total of 147,805 square feet of constructed floor area, on 109 acres of land.
While most of the parcels are developed, nine of the 28 are vacant. The
developed parcels include 111,170 square feet of industrial space within the
Wheat Ridge Industrial Park, United States Truck Driving School, DTI Trucks, and
TruGreen Lawn Care. There are also about 20,000 square feet of retail and
10,000 square feet of office at the northeast corner of West 44th Avenue and
Garison Street. The Study Area also includes adjacent ROW along I-70 frontage
roads, Garison Street, West 44th Avenue, and Wadsworth Boulevard as well as
publicly held open space along the Clear Creek corridor.
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
6
Table 1. Parcels Contained in the Study Area
Land Bldg.
#Parcel Land Use Acres Sq. Ft.Land Improv.Total
1 39-143-00-098 Industrial 0.99 13,020 $75,492 $282,861 $358,353
2 39-143-00-099 Industrial 0.48 9,600 $52,372 $192,823 $245,195
3 39-143-00-100 Industrial 0.62 13,152 $31,837 $387,576 $419,413
4 39-143-00-101 Industrial 0.66 4,000 $30,602 $149,256 $179,858
5 39-143-00-102 Industrial 1.52 0 $61,466 $0 $61,466
6 39-143-00-103 Industrial 0.73 1,440 $30,088 $45,936 $76,024
7 39-143-00-104 Industrial 0.78 0 $29,394 $0 $29,394
8 39-143-07-001 Industrial 0.30 2,994 $20,767 $88,766 $109,533
9 39-143-07-002 Open Space 0.02 0 $203 $0 $203
10 39-143-08-001 Industrial 1.07 19,706 $76,000 $409,257 $485,257
11 39-221-00-006 Office 0.79 9,982 $158,535 $10,738 $169,273
12 39-221-00-007 Retail 1.82 20,234 $247,604 $381,377 $628,981
13 39-221-00-010 Exempt Vacant 0.27 0 $932 $0 $932
14 39-221-00-017 Exempt Vacant 0.49 0 $2,781 $0 $2,781
15 39-221-00-019 Vacant 0.02 0 $203 $0 $203
16 39-221-17-001 Apartments 2.56 6,419 $80,196 $75,762 $155,958
17 39-221-21-001 Industrial 1.74 21,600 $131,882 $651,872 $783,754
18 39-221-21-002 Industrial 2.86 10,570 $120,819 $279,845 $400,664
19 39-221-99-005 Vacant 9.59 0 $190,313 $0 $190,313
20 39-232-00-001 Vacant 0.72 0 $177,510 $0 $177,510
21 39-232-00-001 Vacant 13.44 0 $177,510 $0 $177,510
22 39-232-00-002 Industrial 2.52 0 $115,965 $0 $115,965
23 39-232-00-003 Industrial 7.29 8,000 $48,993 $386,193 $435,186
24 39-232-00-004 Industrial 10.06 3,920 $53,589 $125,048 $178,637
25 39-232-00-005 Vacant 0.94 0 $47,782 $0 $47,782
26 39-232-00-007 Vacant 0.83 0 $10,451 $0 $10,451
27 39-232-00-024 Industrial 3.75 3,168 $119,054 $101,259 $220,313
28 39-232-02-045 Vacant 0.97 0 $9,499 $0 $9,499
ROW 38.49 0 $0 $0 $0
WATER 2.53 0 $0 $0 $0
Total 108.86 147,805 $2,101,839 $3,568,569 $5,670,408
Source: Jefferson County Assessor; Economic & Planning Systems
Z:\Shared\Projects\DEN\233048-Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Plan I-70 & Carr\Data\[233048-Study Area Parcels.xlsx]T-Parcels
Assessed Valuation
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
7
Figure 1. Clearvale Proposed Urban Renewal Boundary and Parcels
Field Survey Approach
The following assessment is based on a field survey conducted by EPS. The survey
team toured the Study Area, taking notes and photographs to document existing
conditions corresponding to the blight factor evaluation criteria detailed in the
following section.
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
8
Blight Factor Evaluation Criteria
This section details the conditions used to evaluate blight during the field survey.
The following conditions correspond with 7 of the 11 blight factors in the Urban
Renewal Law. Additional information on a number of these factors for which data
was available was also collected. The remaining four blight factors cannot be
visually inspected and are dependent on other data sources. Given the prevalence
of physically observable conditions of blight in the initial set of seven, these
remaining blight factors were not investigated.
Street Layout
The following conditions evaluate the Urban Renewal Law blight factor “(b)
predominance of defective or inadequate street layout,” through assessment of the
safety, quality, and efficiency of street layouts, site access, and internal circulation.
Typical examples of conditions that portray this criterion include:
• Inadequate street or alley width / cross-section / geometry
• Poor provision of streets or unsafe conditions for vehicular traffic
• Poor provision of sidewalks/walkways or unsafe conditions for pedestrians
• Insufficient roadway capacity
• Inadequate emergency vehicle access
• Poor vehicular or pedestrian access to buildings or sites
• Excessive curb cuts / driveways along commercial blocks
• Poor internal vehicular or pedestrian circulation
Lot Layout
The following conditions evaluate the Urban Renewal Law blight factor “(c) Faulty
lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness.”
Typical examples of conditions that portray this criterion include:
• Faulty or inadequate lot shape or layout
• Poor vehicular access
• Lot size is deemed unusable
Unsafe/Unsanitary
The following conditions establish evidence of Urban Renewal Law blight factor
“(d) unsanitary or unsafe conditions,” by evaluating visual conditions that indicate
the occurrence of activities that inhibit the safety and health of the area including,
but not limited to, excessive litter, unenclosed dumpsters, and vandalism.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
9
Typical examples include:
• Floodplains or flood prone areas
• Inadequate storm drainage systems/evidence of standing water
• Poor fire protection facilities
• Above average incidences of public safety responses
• Inadequate sanitation or water systems
• Existence of contaminants or hazardous conditions or materials
• High or unusual crime statistics
• Open/unenclosed trash dumpsters
• Cracked or uneven surfaces for pedestrians
• Illegal dumping/excessive litter
• Vagrants/vandalism/graffiti/gang activity
• Open ditches, holes, or trenches in pedestrian areas
• Poorly lit or unlit areas
• Insufficient grading/steep slopes
• Unsafe or exposed electrical wire
Site Improvements
The following conditions evaluate the Urban Renewal Law blight factor “(e)
deterioration of site or other improvements,” by evidence of overall maintenance
deficiencies within the plan area including, deterioration, poorly maintained
landscaping, and overall neglect.
Examples of blighted site improvements include:
• Neglected properties or evidence of maintenance deficiencies
• Deteriorated signage or lighting
• Deteriorated fences, walls, or gates
• Deteriorated on-site parking surfaces, curb and gutter, or sidewalks
• Unpaved parking lot (commercial properties)
• Poor parking lot/driveway layout
• Poorly maintained landscaping/overgrown vegetation
Infrastructure
The observation of the following infrastructure insufficiencies is evidence of Urban
Renewal Law blight factor “(f) unusual topography or inadequate public
improvements or utilities.”
Prototypical features of blight under this topic include:
• Deteriorated pavement, curb, sidewalks, lighting, or drainage
• Lack of pavement, curb, sidewalks, lighting, or drainage
• Presence of overhead utilities or billboards
• Inadequate fire protection facilities/hydrants
• Inadequate sanitation or water systems
• Unusual topography
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
10
Endangerment
The following conditions evaluate the Urban Renewal Law blight factor “(h) The
existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other causes.”
Typical examples of conditions that portray this criterion include:
• Fire safety problems
• Hazardous contaminants
• High frequency of crime
• Floodplain or flood hazards
Vacancy
The following conditions are evidence of Urban Renewal Law blight factor “(k) the
existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high levels of municipal
services or substantial physical underutilization or vacancy of sites, buildings, or
other improvements.” Various examples of features that fulfill this criterion
include:
• An undeveloped parcel in a generally urbanized area
• Disproportionately underdeveloped parcel
• Vacant structures
• Vacant units in multi-unit structures
Other Considerations
The remaining four blight factors specified in the Urban Renewal Law were not
investigated further due to sufficient evidence from the visual field survey
supporting a condition of blight in 7 of the 11 blight factors.
(a) Slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures;
(g) Defective or unusual conditions of title rendering the title
nonmarketable.
(I) Buildings that are unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work in
because of building code violations, dilapidation, deterioration, defective
design, physical construction, or faulty or inadequate facilities.
(j) Environmental contamination of buildings or property,
Results of Field Surve y
This section summarizes the findings of the visual field survey of the Study Area.
Table 2 documents the specific blight conditions observed. These conditions are
further explained following the table, for each specific category, and include
image documentation or supportive data.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
11
Table 2. Blight Conditions in Study Area
2.01 Inadequate Street or Alley Width / Cross-section / Geometry
2.02 Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Vehicular Traffic X
2.03 Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Pedestrians X
2.04 Insufficient Roadway Capacity Leading to Unusual Congestion
2.05 Inadequate Emergency Vehicle Access
2.06 Poor Vehicular or Pedestrian Access to Buildings or Sites
2.07 Excessive Curb Cuts / Driveways along Commercial Blocks
2.08 Poor Internal Vehicular or Pedestrian Circulation X
3.01 Faulty or inadequate lot shape or layout
3.02 Poor vehicular access X
3.03 Lot size is deemed not useful
4.01 Floodplains or Flood Prone Areas X
4.02 Inadequate Storm Drainage Systems/Evidence of Standing Water
4.03 Poor Fire Protection Facilities
4.04 Above Average Incidences of Public Safety Responses
4.05 Inadequate Sanitation or Water Systems
4.06 Existence of Contaminants or Hazardous Conditions or Materials
4.07 High or Unusual Crime Statistics
4.08 Open / Unenclosed Trash Dumpsters X
4.09 Cracked or Uneven Surfaces for Pedestrians
4.10 Illegal Dumping / Excessive Litter X
4.11 Vagrants/Vandalism/Graffiti/Gang Activity X
4.12 Open Ditches, Holes, or Trenches in Pedestrian Areas
5.01 Neglected Properties or Evidence of Maintenance Deficiencies X
5.02 Deteriorated Signage or Lighting X
5.03 Deteriorated Fences, Walls, or Gates X
5.04 Deteriorated On-Site Parking Surfaces, Curb & Gutter, or Sidewalks X
5.05 Unpaved Parking Lot (Commercial Properties)X
5.06 Poor Parking Lot / Driveway Layout
5.07 Poorly Maintained Landscaping / Overgrown Vegetation
6.01 Deteriorated pavement, curb, sidewalks, lighting, or drainage X
6.02 Lack of pavement, curb, sidewalks, lighting, or drainage X
6.03 Presence of Overhead Utilities or Billboards X
6.04 Inadequate Fire Protection Facilities / Hydrants
6.05 Inadequate Sanitation or Water Systems
6.06 Unusual Topography
8.01 Fire safety problems
8.02 Hazardous contaminants
8.03 High frequency of crime
8.04 Floodplain or flood hazards X
11.04 An Undeveloped Parcel in a Generally Urbanized Area X
11.05 Disproportionately Underdeveloped Parcel X
11.06 Vacant Structures
11.07 Vacant Units in Multi-Unit Structures
Va
c
a
n
c
y
Conditions Observed
St
r
e
e
t
L
a
y
o
u
t
Un
s
a
f
e
/
U
n
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
Si
t
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
L
o
t
L
a
y
o
u
t
En
d
a
n
g
e
r
m
e
n
t
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
12
1. Street layout: poor provisions or unsafe conditions for vehicles and
pedestrians, poor internal vehicular or pedestrian circulation
Poor provisions or unsafe conditions for vehicles were observed along West
48th Avenue at the intersection of Carr Street and eastward with cracked
pavement and potholes, as shown in Figure 2. Poor provisions and unsafe
conditions for pedestrians were observed in the form of lack of sidewalks
along West 44th Avenue, as shown in Figure 3. At the intersection of West
48th Avenue and Carr Street there is a shallow sidewalk and curb cut that does
not extend across the street. Additionally, along Garison Street the sidewalk
abruptly ends after the West 44th Avenue intersection and is fragmented along
the rest of Garison with large stretches missing sidewalks on both sides of the
street.
Figure 2. Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Vehicles
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
13
Figure 3. Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Pedestrians
Poor internal vehicular access was observed with West 48th Avenue having no
outlet to the east of Carr Street, shown below in Figure 4 and Figure 5. West
48th Avenue abruptly ends and is tightly constrained by I-70 to the north,
Cleark Creek to the south, and the I-70 off-ramp and Wadsworth Boulevard to
the east leaving no additional opportunities for access points. The limited
access for these parcels along West 48th Avenue restricts the type and amount
of development that can occur.
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
14
Figure 4. Poor Internal Vehicular or Pedestrian Circulation
2. Lot layout: poor vehicular access
As previously mentioned, the northeast section of the Study Area is
constrained by the Interstate and Clear Creek and has only a single access
point along West 48th Avenue, which has no outlet, as shown in Figure 5. This
limited accessibility for the commercial properties in this section of the Study
Area restricts the amount and type of development that is feasible.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
15
Figure 5. Poor Vehicular Access
3. Unsafe/unsanitary: floodplain or flood prone areas, open/unenclosed
dumpsters, excessive litter, and vandalism/graffiti/vagrants
Due to the proximity to Clear Creek, the majority of the Study Area is in a
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), as shown in Figure 6. SFHA is defined by
the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as the area that will be
inundated by the flood event having a 1 percent chance of being equaled or
exceeded in any given year. This is more commonly referred to as the base
flood or 100-year flood.
Throughout the Study Area, several unsafe or unsanitary conditions were
observed including vandalism/graffiti, excessive litter, evidence of vagrants,
and open/unenclosed trash dumpster. Along West 48th Avenue east of Carr
Street two walls/barriers were observed with graffiti. Multiple instances of
graffiti were also observed on a bridge along the Clear Creek trail in the Study
Area, as shown in Figure 7. A concentration of excessive litter was found
along West 48th Avenue with old tires and piles of leaves and branches as well
as trash, cardboard, and plastic bags scattered around, shown below in
Figure 8. Additionally, there was evidence of vagrants with two mattresses, a
bedframe, and bedsheet alongside the street. A trash dumpster was left open
and unenclosed in Wheat Ridge Industrial Park off West 48th Avenue, shown
below in Figure 9.
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
16
Figure 6. Floodplain or Flood Prone Areas
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
17
Figure 7. Vandalism/Graffiti
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
18
Figure 8. Excessive Litter and Evidence of Vagrants
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
19
Figure 9. Open/Unenclosed Trash Dumpster
4. Site improvements: maintenance deficiencies, deteriorated signage,
fences, on-site parking surfaces, and curb and gutter; and unpaved
parking lot
Portions of the Study Area show signs of neglect with deteriorated site
improvements. Evidence of maintenance deficiencies were observed along
West 48th Avenue with a damaged utility box that is unable to close, shown in
Figure 10. Near the truck driving school along West 48th Avenue a
deteriorated sign (Figure 11) and deteriorated fence (Figure 13) were
observed. The fence has a pole detached and is angled downward.
Commercial parking surfaces along West 48th Avenue and West 44th Avenue
show signs of deterioration with potholes and severely cracked pavement
(Figure 13). There is also no curb and gutter along West 48th Avenue east of
Carr Street, with the exception of in front of the Wheat Ridge Industrial Park.
Additionally, the parking lot on the right side of the United States Truck
Driving School is unpaved, shown below in Figure 14.
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
20
Figure 10. Maintenance Deficiencies
Figure 11. Deteriorated Signage
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
21
Figure 12. Deteriorated Fences
Figure 13. Deteriorated On-site Parking Surfaces, and Curb and Gutter
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
22
Figure 14. Unpaved Parking Lot
5. Infrastructure: deteriorated and lack of pavement, curb, and
sidewalks; presence of overhead utilities and billboards
Various types of infrastructure showed signs of deterioration and in need of
maintenance or were entirely lacking including pavement, curbs, and
sidewalks. As previously mentioned, pavement along West 48th Avenue and in
the commercial parking lots along West 44th Avenue showed signs of
deterioration (Figure 15). There is also a significant lack of pavement, curbs,
and sidewalks along West 48th Avenue and Garison Street (Figure 16). The
presence of overhead utilities can be seen throughout many of the photos
taken during the field survey and are also shown below in Figure 17. In
addition to the overhead utilities, the Study Area includes a billboard located
adjacent to I-70 at the end of West 48th Avenue.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
23
Figure 15. Deteriorated Pavement and Curbs
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
24
Figure 16. Lack of Pavement, Curbs, and Sidewalks
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
25
Figure 17. Presence of Overhead Utilities and Billboards
6. Endangerment: floodplain or flood hazards
Endangerment was identified in the Study Area in the form of flood hazards.
Majority of the Study Area is within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) due to
Clear Creek that flows within the east side of the Study Area, as shown
previously in Figure 6.
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
26
7. Vacancy: An undeveloped parcel in a generally urbanized area and
disproportionately underdeveloped parcel
The entirety of the Study Area is not being utilized to its highest and best use.
This is especially apparent for the industrial properties south of West 48th
Avenue and north of West 44th Avenue. These include large parcels used for
construction, truck driving school, and truck sales, which are not the highest
and best uses in an urbanized area such as this. The surrounding area is
developed with a significant amount of residential development and some
commercial along West 44th Avenue and North of I-70 (Figure 18).
Additionally, parcel 25 (Figure 1) at the intersection of Carr Street and West
48th Avenue is an undeveloped parcel in an urbanized area. It is currently
vacant and being used for storage. There are approximately 27 acres of
vacant land within the Study Area, but nearly all of these parcels are either
Clear Creek or ROW and cannot accommodate development.
Figure 18. Underdeveloped in a Generally Urbanized Area
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
233048-Draft Report_Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey.docx 27
3. Conclusions
Based on the definition of a blighted area in the Colorado Urban Renewal Law,
Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) § 31‐25‐101 et seq., and based on the field survey
results of the Study Area, EPS concludes that the Study Area is a blighted area as
defined in the Colorado Urban Renewal Law, Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) § 31‐
25‐101 et seq.
The visual field survey conducted in August 2023 documented 7 of the 11 factors of
blight within the Study Area. Based on the findings of this evaluation, this blighted
area, as written in the Urban Renewal Law, “substantially impairs or arrests the sound
growth of the municipality, retards the provision of housing accommodations, or
constitutes an economic or social liability, and is a menace to the public health,
safety, morals, or welfare.”
Evidence of the following Urban Renewal Law blight factors are documented in this report:
(b) Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout.
(c) Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness.
(d) Unsanitary or unsafe conditions.
(e) Deterioration of site or other improvements.
(f) Unusual topography or inadequate public improvements or utilities.
(h) The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other
causes.
(k.5) The existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high levels of
municipal services or substantial physical underutilization or vacancy of sites,
buildings, or other improvements.
Evidence of the following Urban Renewal Law blight factors were not visually
observable, and based on the presence of other, more significant physical
conditions, these factors of blight did not warrant further investigation.
(a) Slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures.
(g) Defective or unusual conditions of title rendering the title nonmarketable.
(I) Buildings that are unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work in
because of building code violations, dilapidation, deterioration, defective
design, physical construction, or faulty or inadequate facilities.
(j) Environmental contamination of buildings or property.
Clearvale Existing Conditions Survey
28
As established by Urban Renewal case law in Colorado, this assessment is based
on the condition of the Study Area as a whole. There is substantial evidence and
documentation of 7 of the 11 blight factors in the Study Area.
ITEM NUMBER: 2
DATE: September 22, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
RESOLUTION 46-2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LUTHERAN LEGACY
CAMPUS URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND FINDING THAT THE
PLAN AREA IS A BLIGHTED AREA, DESIGNATING SUCH AREA
AS APPROPRIATE FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT
PURSUANT TO THE PLAN, AND FINDING THAT THE
ACQUISITION, CLEARANCE, REHABILITATION,
CONSERVATION, DEVELOPMENT, REDEVELOPMENT, OR A
COMBINATION THEREOF OF SUCH AREA IS NECESSARY IN
THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALS,
AND WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT
RIDGE
☒PUBLIC HEARING
☐BIDS/MOTIONS
☒RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
Urban renewal plans are adopted by City Council and implemented by the Urban
Renewal Authority d/b/a Renewal Wheat Ridge. The proposed Lutheran Legacy Campus
Urban Renewal Plan area is located between 38th Avenue to the north and 32nd Avenue
to the south and Allison Street to the east and Dudley Street to the west. The Plan will
allow for the use of tax increment financing (TIF) within the plan area.
PRIOR ACTION:
City Council provided consensus at the August 1, 2022 study session for Renewal
Wheat Ridge to begin the process of creating a new urban renewal area and plan for
the Lutheran Legacy Campus.
A draft Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan was presented to City Council at
the March 18, 2024 study session. Consensus was reached at that time to bring back
the Plan for formal adoption at a subsequent meeting.
Council Action Form – Lutheran Legacy Campus URA Plan
September 22, 2025
Page 2
On February 15, 2024, the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission unanimously adopted a
resolution finding that the Plan adheres to the City's Comprehensive Plan, Envision
Wheat Ridge, consistent with the process set forth in the Colorado Urban Renewal
Law.
On May 14, 2025, City Council adopted an ordinance to comply with House Bill 15-
1348 in regard to urban renewal authority board membership and tax sharing
agreements with taxing entities within the urban renewal area.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Approval of the Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan will have no direct impact
on the City's budget but could provide for future redevelopment opportunities that
further the City's economic development goals.
BACKGROUND:
Renewal Wheat Ridge (RWR) contracted with Economic and Planning Systems (EPS) to
complete a Conditions Survey to analyze conditions within the Plan Area to determine
whether factors contributing to blight are present and whether the Plan Area may,
therefore, be considered eligible as an urban renewal area under the provision of the
Colorado Urban Renewal Law. It is the conclusion of this survey that there are physical
conditions within the Plan area sufficient to meet criteria in Colorado law as "blighting
factors." Specifically, six of the possible 11 blight factors were found to be present
including:
1. Street layout: poor provisions or unsafe conditions for pedestrians, poor
internal vehicular or pedestrian circulation
2. Lot layout: poor vehicular access
3. Unsafe/unsanitary: cracked or uneven surfaces for pedestrians, excessive
litter, vandalism/graffiti, open ditches, holes, or trenches in pedestrian areas
4. Site improvements: neglected properties, deteriorated signage, lighting, on-
site parking surfaces, curb and gutter, or sidewalks, and unpaved parking lot
5. Infrastructure: deteriorated pavement, curb, sidewalks, or lighting; unusual
topography
6. Vacancy: vacant structures and an underdeveloped parcel in a generally
urbanized area
EPS created the draft Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan with the purpose
and vision of reducing, eliminating and preventing the spread of blight and to stimulate
and catalyze growth and investment within the area boundaries. To accomplish this
purpose the Plan is intended to promote local objectives expressed in adopted
community plans such as the Lutheran Legacy Master Plan, approved by City Council in
October 2021 and advance the priorities of the Envision Wheat Ridge Comprehensive
Plan as well as the newly adopted City Plan.
Council Action Form – Lutheran Legacy Campus URA Plan
September 22, 2025
Page 3
The Plan addresses financing mechanisms and methodology involved in financing
activities pursuant to Urban Renewal Law. The Plan contemplates that the primary
method of assisting with financing eligible expenses in the Plan Area will be through the
use of revenues generated by Property Tax Increment and Sales Tax Increment. It is the
intent of the City Council in approving this Plan to authorize the use of tax increment
financing (TIF) by RWR as part of its efforts to advance the vision, objectives, and
activities described in the Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the Lutheran Legacy Urban Renewal Plan for the
following reasons:
• The Plan is consistent with many of the values, goals. and strategies stated in the
City Plan.
• The Plan will facilitate the redevelopment of a blighted area and help stimulate
growth in jobs, housing, sales tax, and aesthetic appeal of the community.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Resolution No. 46-2025, a resolution approving the Lutheran Legacy
Campus Urban Renewal Plan and finding that the Plan Area is a blighted area
designating such area as appropriate for an urban renewal project pursuant to the Plan,
and finding that the acquisition, clearance, rehabilitation, conservation, development,
redevelopment, or a combination thereof of such area is necessary in the interest of the
public health, safety, morals, and welfare of the residents of the City of Wheat Ridge."
Or,
“I move to table indefinitely Resolution No. 46-2025, a resolution approving the Lutheran
Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan and finding that the Plan Area is a blighted area
designating such area as appropriate for an urban renewal project pursuant to the Plan,
and finding that the acquisition, clearance, rehabilitation, conservation, development,
redevelopment, or a combination thereof of such area is necessary in the interest of the
public health, safety, morals, and welfare of the residents of the City of Wheat Ridge, for
the following reason(s) _____ "
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Steve Art, Executive Director RWR
Corey Hoffmann, RWR Legal Counsel
Patrick Goff, City Manager
Council Action Form – Lutheran Legacy Campus URA Plan
September 22, 2025
Page 4
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 46-2025
2. Exhibit A – Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
3. Lutheran Legacy Campus Conditions Survey
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 46
SERIES OF 2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LUTHERAN LEGACY CAMPUS
URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND FINDING THAT THE PLAN AREA IS A
BLIGHTED AREA, DESIGNATING SUCH AREA AS APPROPRIATE
FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PLAN,
AND FINDING THAT THE ACQUISITION, CLEARANCE,
REHABILITATION, CONSERVATION, DEVELOPMENT,
REDEVELOPMENT, OR A COMBINATION THEREOF OF SUCH AREA
IS NECESSARY IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH,
SAFETY, MORALS, AND WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
WHEREAS, an urban renewal plan for the Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban
Renewal Plan Area (the “Area”) has been submitted to the City Council of the City of
Wheat Ridge pursuant to Part 1 of Article 25 of Title 31, C.R.S.;
WHEREAS, Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan Area which is
subject to the Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan (the “Plan”) is described
in Exhibit A to this Resolution;
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has submitted its written
recommendation to the City Council that the Plan is in conformance with the Wheat
Ridge Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 31-25-107(2), C.R.S.;
WHEREAS, a copy of the Plan and information regarding the impact of the Plan
were submitted to the taxing entities imposing a mill levy on the Plan Area;
WHEREAS, notices of the public hearing for consideration and approval of the
Plan by City Council were provided by publication and by written notices to property
owners, residents, and business owners in the Area in compliance with the Urban
Renewal Law, C.R.S. §§ 31-25-101 et seq.;
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the Plan was held on September 22, 2025,
providing a full opportunity for property owners, residents, taxpayers, people and
business owners in the Area and all interested persons to be heard;
WHEREAS, the inclusion of certain areas and properties designated in the Plan
within the Area would provide for the elimination and prevention of blight and the
development, redevelopment and rehabilitation of the blighted areas, so that the areas
ATTACHMENT 1
can be developed or redeveloped by the public and private sectors to provide a safer
and more useful environment for its users and inhabitants; to develop and redevelop
such properties to provide necessary, greater and reasonable economic utilization of
such areas; to promote, enhance and provide public facilities; to eliminate traffic,
transportation, pedestrian and other hazards within the areas; to ensure reasoned and
sound social, physical and economic growth and improvement within the City; to
promote the public health, safety and welfare; to promote and effect the goals,
objectives and purposes of the Plan and the Comprehensive Plan of the City; to provide
a sound financial and economic base for the community; to provide a necessary tax
base for the City and to comply with the intent and purpose of the Urban Renewal Law;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a public hearing, considered the
public testimony, and hereby determines, that it is in the best interests of the City of
Wheat Ridge and the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority to adopt the Plan as
proposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Wheat Ridge City Council, that:
Section 1. Blight as defined by C.R.S. § 31-25-103(2) is present in the Lutheran
Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan Area as documented by the City of Wheat Ridge
Lutheran Legacy Campus Conditions Survey prepared by Economic and Planning
Systems and based on evidence presented at the public hearing. The following blight
factors are present in the Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Area: Street layout:
poor provisions or unsafe conditions for pedestrians, poor internal vehicular or
pedestrian circulation; Lot layout: poor vehicular access; Unsafe/unsanitary: cracked or
uneven surfaces for pedestrians, excessive litter, vandalism/graffiti, open ditches, holes,
or trenches in pedestrian areas; Site improvements: neglected properties, deteriorated
signage, lighting, on-site parking surfaces, curb and gutter, or sidewalks, and unpaved
parking lot; Infrastructure: deteriorated pavement, curb, sidewalks, or lighting; unusual
topography; Vacancy: vacant structures and an underdeveloped parcel in a generally
urbanized area.
Section 2. The Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan Area is a blighted area
and is appropriate for an urban renewal project, pursuant to Part 1 of Article 25 of Title
31, C.R.S.
Section 3. The principal purpose for the adoption of the Lutheran Legacy Campus
Urban Plan is to facilitate redevelopment in order to eliminate or prevent the spread of
physically blighted areas.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings with respect to the
proposed Plan:
A. A feasible method exists for the relocation of families or individuals
who may or will be displaced by redevelopment projects in decent, safe
and sanitary dwelling accommodations within their means and without
undue hardship.
B. A feasible method exists for the relocation of business concerns that
may or will be displaced by redevelopment projects either in the Area
or in other areas that are not generally less desirable regarding public
utilities and public and commercial facilities.
C. The City Council has caused its staff to take reasonable efforts to
provide written notice of the public hearing to property owners,
residents and business owners in the Area at their last known
addresses at least 30 days prior to this public hearing of September
22, 2025.
D. Section 31-25-107 (4) (e) C.R.S. of the Urban Renewal Law does not
apply in that not more than 120 days have passed since the first public
hearing on this Plan, because this is the first public hearing.
E. Section 31-25-107 (4) (e) C.R.S. of the Urban Renewal Law does not
apply in that City Council did not fail to previously approve this Plan
F. The Plan conforms to the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
G. The provisions of the Plan, consistent with the needs of the City,
provide maximum opportunity for redevelopment of the Area by private
enterprise.
H. Section 31-25-107 (5) C.R.S. of the Urban Renewal Law is not
applicable to this Plan.
I. To the extent that the Area may consist of an areas of open land which
may be developed for non-residential uses under the Plan, City
Council hereby determines that such non-residential uses are
necessary and appropriate to facilitate the proper growth and
development of the City in accordance with sound planning standards
and City’s objectives. The potential acquisition of such areas may
require the actions of the Authority, in compliance with the Urban
Renewal Law, because such open areas are within areas of blight or
blighted conditions.
J. City Council has determined that the boundaries of the Areas have
been drawn as narrowly as feasible to accomplish the planning and
development objectives of the Plan in accordance with Section 31-25-
107(1) C.R.S. of the Urban Renewal Law.
K. The acquisition, clearance, rehabilitation, conservation, development
or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Lutheran Legacy
Campus Urban Renewal Area pursuant to the Lutheran Legacy
Campus Urban Renewal Plan is necessary and in the best interests of
the public health safety morals and welfare of the residents of the City
of Wheat Ridge.
Section 5. The Plan provides for the use of tax increment financing, such financing
mechanisms will be utilized with the initial adoption of this Plan.
Section 6. Taxing entities imposing a mill levy upon the Plan Area were provided a
copy of the Plan and information regarding its impact, in compliance with Urban Renewal
Law.
Section 7. The Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority is authorized to exercise the
powers of eminent domain to carry out, effect or administer the Plan.
Section 8. The proposed Plan accompanying this Resolution and incorporated herein
is adopted as the Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan for the City of Wheat
Ridge and may be referred to as the Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan. The
Plan is an urban renewal plan as defined in Section 31-25-103(9) C.R.S. of the Urban
Renewal Law
Section 9. The Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan shall control the land
area, land use, design, building requirements, timing of development, and procedure for
implementation of such Plan in the Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan Area
and in the City of Wheat Ridge, as may be applicable.
DONE AND RESOLVED this 22nd day of September 2025.
[SEAL] Bud Starker, Mayor
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
Lutheran Legacy Campus
Urban Renewal Plan
Prepared for:
Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority dba Renewal Wheat Ridge
and the City of Wheat Ridge
Prepared by:
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
October 25, 2023
EPS #223132
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT A
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................. 1
Preface ........................................................................................................ 1
Blight Findings .............................................................................................. 1
Urban Renewal Area Boundaries ...................................................................... 1
Ownership ................................................................................................... 2
Zoning and Land Use ..................................................................................... 2
Definitions ............................................................................................... 4
Plan Purpose ............................................................................................ 6
Vision .......................................................................................................... 6
Blight Conditions ...................................................................................... 8
Plan Goals and Conformance .................................................................... 10
Plan Goals and Objectives ............................................................................ 10
Plan Conformance ....................................................................................... 10
Authorized Urban Renewal Undertakings and Activities ................................ 18
Project Financing .................................................................................... 22
Financing Powers ........................................................................................ 22
Tax Increment Financing District ................................................................... 23
Property Tax Increment Financing ................................................................. 23
Sales Tax Increment Financing ...................................................................... 25
Tax Increment Reimbursements .................................................................... 26
Severability and Reasonable Variations ...................................................... 27
Effective Date of the Plan ......................................................................... 28
List of Tables
Table 1. Parcels contained in the Plan Area ........................................................... 3
List of Figures
Figure 1. Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan Area.................................... 2
Figure 2. Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan Zones ........................................... 14
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
223132-Draft Lutheran Legacy Campus URA Plan_8-20-2025 1
Introduction
Preface
This document, Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan (“Plan” or the
“Urban Renewal Plan”) has been prepared for the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado
(the “City”), a home rule municipality of the State of Colorado. The Plan will be
carried out by Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority dba Renewal Wheat Ridge
(the “Authority”), pursuant to the provisions of the Urban Renewal Law of the
State of Colorado, Part 1 of Article 25 of Title 31, Colorado Revised Statutes,
1973, as amended to date (the “Act”). The administration and implementation of
this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents implementing
it, shall be performed by the Authority.
Blight Findings
Under the Act, an urban renewal area is a blighted area, as defined by the Act,
and has been designated as appropriate for an urban renewal project by the City
Council of the City (the “City Council”). In each urban renewal area, conditions of
blight must be present, and the City Council must find that the presence of those
conditions of blight substantially impair or arrest the sound growth of the
municipality or constitutes an economic or social liability, and is a menace to the
public health, safety, morals, or welfare for the Authority to exercise its powers.
The Project Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey prepared by
Economic & Planning Systems (EPS) in August 2023 (“Conditions Survey”) was
provided to the Authority under separate cover and demonstrates that the Project
Lutheran Legacy Campus (“Study Area”), as defined in the Conditions Study, is
eligible to be declared a blighted area by the City Council under the Act. The
Conditions Survey identified and documented 6 of the 11 blight factors present in
the Study Area. A description of the blight factors and observations is presented
below in Section 4 of this report.
Urban Renewal Area Boundaries
The Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Area (“URA” or “Plan Area”) is located
in the City of Wheat Ridge in Jefferson County. The Plan Area is comprised of 20
parcels on approximately 112 acres of land and adjacent right of way (ROW) along
West 38th Avenue, West 32nd Avenue, Dudley Street, Allison Street, and the Rocky
Mountain Ditch. The address of the Plan Area to which this Plan applies is generally
located at 8300 West 38th Avenue, illustrated below in Figure 1 and more
particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part of hereof.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
2
Figure 1. Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan Area
Ownership
The parcels located within the Plan Area are owned by the Sisters of Charity of
Leavenworth Health, Foothills Medical Building Company LLP, and the City and
County of Denver.
Zoning and Land Use
The parcels within the Plan Area are currently used as a combination of hospital
and medical offices, parking for these facilities, vacant land, and water elements
including an irrigation ditch and some ponds that function as landscape features,
as shown in Table 1. The improvements in the Plan Area include the hospital with
approximately 675,100 square feet and various medical office buildings with a
total of approximately 111,000 square feet.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
3
Most of the Plan Area is currently zoned Planned Hospital Development (PHD)
except for the medical office building at the northwest corner of the Plan Area
(parcel 39-271-01-004), which is zoned Planned Commercial District (PCD) and
parcels along the western edge of the Plan Area that are zoned Residential-One
(R-1) (parcel 39-271-01-005) and Residential-Two (R-2) (parcel 39-271-12-001).
PHD and PCD designated areas have property specific zoning and their own list of
permitted uses and development standards that apply to the specific property. R-
1 and R-2 zoning districts typically provide high quality, safe, quiet, and stable
low- to moderate-density residential neighborhoods, and prohibit activities of any
nature that are incompatible with the residential character.
Table 1. Parcels contained in the Plan Area
Since the relocation of the hospital was not anticipated, the land uses proposed in
the Plan Area do not align with current zoning classifications. However, in 2021,
the City adopted the Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan that charts the path
for redevelopment and recommends amendments to the zoning, as well as
Envision Wheat Ridge and the City Charter in order to facilitate redevelopment of
the campus.
Land Bldg.
#Parcel Land Use Acres Sq. Ft.Land Improv. Total
1 39-271-01-004 Medical Office 2.52 44,805 $635,663 $1,200,559 $1,836,222
2 39-262-00-021 Vacant 38.45 0 $499,822 $0 $499,822
3 39-262-00-045 Hospital 29.06 675,098 $377,761 $14,491,127 $14,868,888
4 39-262-00-041 Medical Office 0.40 46,454 $105,623 $1,612,303 $1,717,926
5 39-271-01-005 Vacant 0.01 0 $203 $0 $203
6 39-271-01-002 Vacant 2.79 0 $43,465 $0 $43,465
7 39-271-00-012 Parking 2.16 0 $136,431 $14,462 $150,893
8 39-262-00-011 Medical Office 0.00 0 $6,742 $102,913 $109,655
9 39-262-00-012 Vacant 3.30 0 $448,134 $0 $448,134
10 39-271-00-043 Vacant 0.32 0 $64,477 $0 $64,477
11 39-271-12-001 Vacant 2.52 0 $32,750 $0 $32,750
12 39-262-00-040 Medical Office 14.27 19,426 $1,938,278 $249,105 $2,187,383
13 39-262-99-001 Vacant 1.26 0 $5,828 $0 $5,828
14 39-262-00-044 Vacant 2.02 0 $26,260 $0 $26,260
15 39-271-00-042 Exempt Vacant 1.91 0 $8,839 $0 $8,839
16 39-262-08-007 Vacant 1.99 0 $25,830 $0 $25,830
17 39-262-08-006 Medical Office 2.00 638 $12,641 $9,606 $22,247
18 WATER Vacant 0.54 0 $0 $0 $0
19 WATER Vacant 0.43 0 $0 $0 $0
20 WATER Vacant 0.57 0 $0 $0 $0
ROW 5.49 0 $0 $0 $0
Total 112.00 786,421 $4,368,747 $17,680,075 $22,048,822
Source: Jefferson County Assessor; Economic & Planning Systems
Assessed Valuation
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
4
Definitions
Terms used in this Plan are defined below and are representative of Urban Renewal
Law C.R.S. § 31-25-103.
• Act or Urban Renewal Law – Urban Renewal Law of the State of Colorado,
C.R.S. § 31-25-101 et seq.
• Available Property Tax Increment Revenues – all Property Tax Increment
Revenues available pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing provisions of the
Act not payable to taxing bodies pursuant to agreements, if any, with the
Authority or otherwise as provided in C.R.S. §31-25-107(9.5) of the Act. In
the event that an agreement is reached with a taxing body pursuant to C.R.S. §
31-25-107(9.5) of the Act after the effective date of Plan approval by the City
Council, the Property Tax Increment Revenues generated by said taxing body’s
mill levy shall become Available Property Tax Increment Revenues, and the
addition of such revenue shall not be a substantial modification to this Plan.
• Available Revenues – any and all revenues available to the Authority,
including, without limitation, Available Property Tax Increment Revenues, any
revenues available to the Authority from Districts, or any other source that
are available under this Plan or otherwise under the Act.
• Bonds – any bonds (including refunding bonds), notes, interim certificates or
receipts, temporary bonds, certificates of indebtedness, debentures, or other
obligations.
• District (or Districts) – for purposes of C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9) means a
metropolitan district which is a quasi-municipal corporation and political
subdivision of the State of Colorado organized under the Colorado Special
District Act, 32-1-101, et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or a
business improvement district which is a quasi-municipal corporation and
political subdivision of the State of Colorado organized under the Colorado
Business Improvement District Act, 31-25-1201, et seq., C.R.S., as from time
to time amended, or any successor District or Districts thereto as may be
approved by the City. Provided however, for purposes of C.R.S. § 31-25-104,
the term “District” shall be limited to metropolitan [or special] district which is
a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado
organized under the Colorado Special District Act, 32-1-101, et seq., C.R.S.
• Property Taxes – means, without limitation, all levies to be made on an ad
valorem basis by or for the benefit of any public body upon taxable real and
personal property in the Area.
• Property Tax Increment Revenues – the property tax revenues allocated to
the Authority pursuant to C.R.S. §31-25-107(9) of the Act and Section 7.0 of
this Plan.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
5
• Real property – lands, lands under water, structures, and any and all
easements, franchises, incorporeal hereditaments, and every estate and right
therein, legal and equitable, including terms for years and liens by way of
judgment, mortgage, or otherwise.
• Redevelopment/Development Agreement – one or more agreements
between the Authority and developer(s) and/or property owners or such other
individuals or entities as determined by the Authority to be essential to carry
out the objectives of this Plan.
• Slum area – an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or
improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, and which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for
ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population
and overcrowding, or the existence of conditions which endanger life or
property by fire or other causes, or any combination of such factors, is
conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile
delinquency, or crime and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals,
or welfare.
• Tax increment financing (TIF) – the tax allocation financing as described in
C.R.S. 31-25-107(9) of the Act as in effect on the date this Plan is approved
by City Council.
• Urban Renewal Authority or Authority – a corporate body organized
pursuant to the provisions of the Act for the purposes, with the powers, and
subject to the restrictions set forth in the Act.
• Urban Renewal Plan or Plan – a plan, as it exists from time to time, for an
urban renewal project, which plan conforms to a general or master plan for
the physical development of the municipality as a whole and which is
sufficiently complete to indicate such land acquisition, demolition and removal
of structures, redevelopment, improvements, and rehabilitation as may be
proposed to be carried out in the urban renewal area, zoning and planning
changes, if any, land uses, maximum densities, building requirements, and
the plan's relationship to definite local objectives respecting appropriate land
uses, improved traffic, public transportation, public utilities, recreational and
community facilities, and other public improvements.
• Urban Renewal Project – undertakings and activities for the elimination and
for the prevention of the development or spread of slums and blight and may
involve slum clearance and redevelopment, or rehabilitation, or conservation,
or any combination or part thereof, in accordance with an urban renewal plan.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
6
Plan Purpose
The purpose of this Plan is to reduce, eliminate, and prevent the spread of blight
within the Plan Area following the relocation of the hospital, through private
development. The Plan sets goals to achieve this through implementing established
objectives for the Area and assisting with the eligible costs of environmental
mitigation, redevelopment, promoting economic growth and private investment
through the tools available within the context of urban renewal tools, laws, and
guidelines, including, without limitation, tax increment financing (TIF).
Establishment of the Urban Renewal Area will take advantage of improving
conditions and the upcoming development cycle by focusing urban renewal efforts
in a small area for the duration in accordance with the mandates of the Act.
Vision
The vision of the Plan Area, as expressed in the Lutheran Legacy Campus Master
Plan, is to create a flexible mixed-use development in the center with medium to
higher density between North Lutheran Parkway and Lutheran Parkway West.
Mindful of low-density residential areas neighboring the campus, the Plan seeks to
create a buffer along the periphery of the site with a mix of lower density
residences and/or open space, integrated with bicycle and pedestrian pathways
that can connect residents to the center of the site. Further, the Plan aims to
preserve and repurpose viable existing assets including several medical office
buildings, a portion of the main existing hospital building, certain sites of historic
significance, and the campus’ highly valued open spaces, including the Rocky
Mountain Ditch that traverses the Plan Area from the southeast to northwest.
Lastly, the Plan encourages high urban design quality and sustainability integrated
into any potential future development.
The Plan Area is a brownfield redevelopment and an infill development using
space within the urban context rather than developing on the outside or edges of
the city, recognizing the unique opportunity that the relocation of the existing
medical campus offers. The Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan sets goals that
were informed by the community and a market study to guide future development
within the Plan Area. Based on the expectations of the Master Plan, the Urban
Renewal Plan aims to facilitate one of the two following scenarios:
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
7
Scenario 1
The first scenario that the Plan can enable is a medium-density mixed-use
development in the center of the site between North Lutheran Parkway and
Lutheran Parkway West, with a combination of retail, office, employment, and
residential opportunities. The center of the site would accommodate community
amenities such as pocket parks, an amphitheater, and civic amenities, along with
office uses. It would promote retail uses along the eastern portion of 38th Avenue
and along the northern portion of North Lutheran Parkway.
The scenario will provide a diversity of housing options for both rent and ownership,
catering to an array of preferences, income levels, and households, distributed
across the site at varying densities – medium density towards the center of the
site (30 dwelling units per acre), and lower-density along the southern portions of
North Lutheran Parkway and Lutheran Parkway West (10 dwelling units per acre)
and along the edges of the site (8 dwelling units per acre).
Lastly, this scenario will incorporate active and passive open spaces along the
Rocky Mountain Ditch and the edges of the Plan Area that can become assets to
future residents of the campus and to the overall neighborhood.
Scenario 2
Within the second scenario, the Plan aims to create a higher density residential
development with flexible mixed-use development, comprising retail, office, and
employment opportunities similar to Scenario 1. Likewise, it will also create a
diverse set of housing options of higher density towards the center of the site (60
dwelling units per acre) and medium to lower density towards the edges of the
Plan Area with 25 dwelling units per acre along the Parkways and 8 dwelling units
per acre along the edges of the site.
Drawing from elements in the first scenario, Scenario 2 will also incorporate active
and passive open spaces along the Rocky Mountain Ditch and in the peripheral
zones of the Plan Area.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
8
Blight Conditions
Before an urban renewal plan can be adopted by the City Council, there must be a
determination that an area constitutes a blighted area. This determination
depends upon the presence of several physical, environmental, and social factors.
Blight is attributable to a range of conditions that, in combination, tend to
accelerate the phenomenon of deterioration of an area. The definition of a
blighted area is based upon the definition articulated in the Urban Renewal Law
(C.R.S. § 31-25-103) as follows:
“Blighted area” means an area that, in its present condition and use and, by
reason of the presence of at least four of the following factors, substantially
impairs or arrests the sound growth of the municipality, retards the provision
of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability, and
is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare:
a. Slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures;
b. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout;
c. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or
usefulness;
d. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions;
e. Deterioration of site or other improvements;
f. Unusual topography or inadequate public improvements or utilities;
g. Defective or unusual conditions of title rendering the title
nonmarketable;
h. The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire and
other causes;
i. Buildings that are unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work in
because of building code violations, dilapidation, deterioration,
defective design, physical construction, or faulty or inadequate
facilities;
j. Environmental contamination of buildings or property;
k.5. The existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high levels
of municipal services or substantial physical underutilization or
vacancy of sites, building, or other improvements; or
l. If there is no objection by the property owner or owners and the
tenant or tenants of such owner or owners, if any, to the inclusion of
such property in an urban renewal area, "blighted area" also means an
area that, in its present condition and use and, by reason of the
presence of any one of the factors specified in paragraphs (a) to (k.5)
of this subsection (2), substantially impairs or arrests the sound
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
9
growth of the municipality, retards the provision of housing
accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability, and is a
menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. For purposes
of this paragraph (l), the fact that an owner of an interest in such
property does not object to the inclusion of such property in the urban
renewal area does not mean that the owner has waived any rights of
such owner in connection with laws governing condemnation.
To use the powers of eminent domain, the definition of “blighted” is broadened to
require that five of the eleven blight factors must be present (C.R.S. § 31-25-
105.5(5)(a)):
(a) “Blighted area” shall have the same meaning as set forth in section 31-25-
103 (2); except that, for the purposes of this section only, “blighted area”
means an area that, in its present condition and use and, by reason of the
presence of at least five of the factors specified in section 31-25-103 (2)(a) to
(2)(l), substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the municipality,
retards the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic
or social liability, and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or
welfare.
The methodology used to prepare the Conditions Survey for the Plan Area
involved the following steps: (i) identify parcels to be included in the Plan Area;
(ii) gather information about the properties and infrastructure within the Plan
Area boundaries; (iii) evaluate evidence of blight through field reconnaissance;
and (iv) record observed and documented conditions listed as blight factors in
State Statute. Based on the parameters established by the State regarding the
determination of blight, this has been found to meet these conditions. The entire
Conditions Survey is provided under separate cover.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
10
Plan Goals and Conformance
Plan Goals and Objectives
The overall objective of this Plan is to remediate unfavorable existing conditions
and prevent further deterioration by implementation of the relevant provisions
contained in the following documents:
• Envision Wheat Ridge (City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan), 2009
• Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan, 2021
The Plan is intended to stimulate private sector development in the Plan Area with
a combination of private investment and Authority financing. The Plan has the
following objectives:
• Implement the Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan and Envision Wheat
Ridge
• Prevent and eliminate conditions of blight within the City of Wheat Ridge
• Encourage and provide incentives for private development
• Encourage the development of projects that would not otherwise be
considered financially feasible without the participation of Renewal Wheat
Ridge
• Enhance the current property tax revenue within the city and county with
development that will increase the assessed valuation
Plan Conformance
Urban Renewal Law
This Plan is in conformity with and subject to the applicable statutory
requirements of the Urban Renewal Law of the State of Colorado.
Envision Wheat Ridge
The City of Wheat Ridge last updated and adopted its Comprehensive Plan, known
as Envision Wheat Ridge, in 2009, which established the vision and direction for
the future of Wheat Ridge. Envision Wheat Ridge did not anticipate the relocation
of the hospital; therefore, its Structure Plan designates the Urban Renewal Area
as a public/institutional land use for primary employment and noted the site’s role
as a community and neighborhood anchor. The specific vision for this site has
evolved, given the hospital’s decision to leave this site (which caused the City to
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
11
reconsider the long-term vision for the site and commission the Lutheran Legacy
Master Plan). In addition to the specific vision found in that plan, the
Comprehensive Plan speaks to the benefit of redevelopment, as noted in the
following sections below.
The redevelopment in this Plan supports five key values from Envision Wheat
Ridge and corresponding goals and policies. The following excerpts from Envision
Wheat Ridge highlight the linkage between Envision Wheat Ridge and this Plan
under these five key values. These are representative excerpts, and not an all-
inclusive list of relevant statements:
Key Value - Economy and Land Use
The motivation behind this key value is to create a resilient local economy based on a balanced mix of land uses. The
value highlights the importance of prioritizing opportunities for local employment, commercial goods and services, and mixed-use activity centers to serve and balance the
community’s residential foundations and ensuring long-term fiscal stability.
• Goal ELU 4 – Increase the diversity of land uses, ensuring that limited
future development and redevelopment areas provide increased
opportunities for employment, retail, and commercial services, along
new housing options, to achieve a sustainable and balanced mix of
land uses for the community.
o Policy ELU 4.1 – Efficiently use limited land for development and
redevelopment by promoting higher-intensity development.
• Goal ELU 5 – Revitalize key redevelopment areas, targeting areas
with immediate redevelopment needs with efforts that support and
promote investment and quality design, projecting a positive image for
the community and enhancing the surrounding context.
o Policy ELU 5.2 – Require high quality urban design for all future
infill and redevelopment to ensure compatibility with surrounding
neighborhoods, and to improve overall appearance of the
community’s primary corridors and activity centers.
Key Value – Neighborhoods and Housing
By promoting vibrant neighborhoods and an array of housing options, this key value recognizes the importance of
catering to new household types and residents who are looking for alternatives to the community’s large supply of single-family housing. It further elaborates on how new housing types will help satisfy current market demands, attract new households, provide housing options for
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
12
residents to remain in the community as they age, and meet housing needs for new employers.
• Goal NH 2 – Increase the diversity of the community’s housing supply
to attract new household types and meet the changing needs of the
community’s residents.
o Policy NH 2.1 – Direct development of new housing types such as
townhomes, condos/lofts, and senior living units to meet market
demand.
Key Value – Community Character and Design
This value aims to enhance community character and accentuate quality design in new development and
redevelopment, so as to accentuate the community’s character and attractiveness, and add a sense of place and appeal to the community’s unique places.
• Goal CC 2 – The City of Wheat Ridge will lead by example by
committing to quality, energy efficient buildings and facilities.
o Policy CC 2.1 – When updating existing facilities or constructing
new public facilities, the City of What Ridge will meet or exceed
established design and character requirements to set the tone for
future private development efforts.
• Goal CC 3 – Ensure quality design for development and
redevelopment.
o Policy CC 3.1 – Require new development and redevelopment to
exemplify high quality urban design to enhance the city’s character.
Key Value – Community Services
This key value highlights the importance of providing quality community amenities, services, and resources that sustain
and enhance the community’s livability.
• Goal CS 2 – Continue to invest in parks, recreation, and open space.
o Policy CS 2.1 - Continue to maintain and enhance parks,
recreation, and open space offerings and facilities, while
periodically identifying future parkland needs.
• Goal CS 6 – Continue to support diverse arts and cultural amenities.
o Policy CS 6.1 – Continue to provide existing arts and cultural
offerings such as community concerts, public art, the historic park,
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
13
and the Carnation Festival and seek opportunities to partner and
expand arts and cultural programs.
Key Value – Sustainable Future
This key value aims to ensure a sustainable future, balancing
the needs and quality of life of the community, with
stewardship and respect for the natural environment and resources, and economic opportunities and benefits.
• Goal SF 1 – Establish and maintain a resilient and sustainable tax
base that will be able to support community services.
o Policy SF 1.2 – Create a diverse and broader revenue base by
facilitating the development of local and regional retail and
employment and encouraging local shopping and dining.
• Goal SF 2 – Protect and preserve natural assets including its scenic
and environmental asses, the urban tree canopy, and drainage ways.
o Policy SF 2.1 – Provide stewardship of unique and sensitive
natural resources and areas.
• Goal SF 4 – Maintain a healthy and active community and encourage
opportunities for lifelong activity and engagement.
o Policy SF 4.1 – Promote physical activity and increase
recreational opportunities, partly by developing pedestrian and
bicycle connections between neighborhoods and existing and
proposed community activity center and employment
opportunities.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
14
Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan
The Lutheran Legacy Master Plan is considered an amendment to the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and this Plan directly supports the overall themes in both
Envision Wheat Ridge and the Lutheran Legacy Master Plan. The following
recommendations from the Lutheran Legacy Master Plan are supported by
this Plan.
Detailed Recommendations and Considerations
The Master Plan, informed by the community’s vision, divides
the campus into four zones, and lays out specific recommendations for the potential mix of uses, urban
design and building form, and for multimodal connectivity.
Figure 2. Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan Zones
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
15
Zone 1: West of Lutheran Parkway West
Given the proximity to the existing residential neighborhood west of Dudley
Street, Zone 1 will have fewer intensive uses and primarily consist of lower
density residential units that are compatible with the surrounding single-family
homes. The existing medical offices on the corner of 38th and Dudley will be
preserved, and open space will be integrated into the site providing connectivity
to other zones that provide more uses. With Lower Density Residential being
the primary development type of the zone, single family homes, duplexes,
triplexes, and other attached products will be constructed and building form
should be compatible with the surrounding regardless of housing type.
Walkability and connectivity to other zones and existing neighborhoods should
be prioritized. With more intensive uses located in other zones, the site will
offer safe bike and pedestrian routes so residents will not have to use vehicles
to access amenities. This zone will act as a buffer between existing
neighborhoods and dense development in the center of the site.
Zone 2: Between Lutheran Parkway West and North Lutheran
Parkway, generally north of the Rocky Mountain Ditch.
This zone can provide a mix of uses including community destinations,
employment opportunities, and a diversity of housing. A distinguishing
element of this zone would be the retail along 38th Avenue and the northern
most section of North Lutheran Parkway. With denser, multifamily housing,
office, civic uses, and retail concentrated in this space, a dynamic and vibrant
public realm will be key to allow for an engaging experience. Buildings should
be designed to maximize public access and circulation for pedestrians. Retail
with an engaging ground floor and streetscaping will be key to encouraging
street traffic. Some strategic retail will be a key component for delivering
additional community needs and amenities, particularly creating a walkable,
main street environment. Access to the Rocky Mountain Ditch will be another
key amenity to this zone. The concentration of civic uses also provides the
opportunity to integrate facilities such as amphitheaters, libraries, and plazas
for residents and visitors to enjoy. The Chapel and Blue House should be
targeted for preservation, rehabilitation, or restoration, assuming that other
adjacent development can offset the reduced return on the investment.
Zone 3: Between Lutheran Parkway West and North Lutheran
Parkway, generally south of the Rocky Mountain Ditch
This zone accommodates the greatest diversity of development types
including community destinations, employment opportunities, and a diversity
of housing. With denser, multifamily housing, office, and civic uses
concentrated in this space, a dynamic and vibrant public realm will be key to
allow for an engaging experience for residents, workers, and visitors. The plan
calls for buildings that will maximize public access and circulation for
pedestrians and provide amenities that encourage people to linger and engage
with the space. Given the density of the zone, non-vehicular modes of
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
16
transportation should be prioritized to minimize congestion on site. With
transit stops remaining on the edge of the Campus, safe and accessible bike
and pedestrian routes leading to this zone will be critical. The Rocky Mountain
Ditch will be a key amenity to this zone. A potential concentration of civic uses
provides opportunities to integrate facilities such as amphitheaters, libraries,
and plazas for residents and visitors to enjoy.
Zone 4: Eastern and southern edges of campus, generally east of
Lutheran Parkway North
Given the proximity to the existing residential neighborhood along Allison
Street, Zone 4 will have fewer intensive uses and primarily consist of the
Lower Density Residential development type, with dwelling units that are
compatible with the surrounding single-family homes. The existing hospice
center at the south end of zone will be preserved, and open space will be
integrated into the site providing connectivity to other zones that provide
more uses. There could also be retail along Lutheran Parkway and 38th
Avenue, and some office use at the current West Pines location. With lower
density residential being the primary use of the zone, single family homes,
duplexes, and triplexes, and other attached products will be constructed.
Walkability and connectivity to other zones and existing neighborhoods should
be prioritized. With more intensive uses located in other zones, the site will
offer safe bike and pedestrian routes so residents will not have to use vehicles
to access amenities. This zone will act as a buffer between existing
neighborhoods and denser development in the center of the site. Retail will be
a key component for delivering additional community needs and amenities,
particularly creating a walkable, main street environment.
Process moving forward – Evaluate creation of Urban Renewal Area
The Master Plan, in consideration of challenges around funding redevelopment and/or adaptive reuse of existing structures, updating and/or expanding utility and infrastructure systems, and enhancing the public realm, recommends the creation of an Urban Renewal Area.
• The City should evaluate the creation of an Urban Renewal Plan Area
(URPA), beginning with a Conditions Survey. The Wheat Ridge Urban
Renewal Authority, otherwise known as Renewal Wheat Ridge (RWR) is
committed to improving the visual aesthetics and environmental aspects
of the community, both concerns that have been noted in the engagement
process given the infrastructural implications of redevelopment and the
declining quality of the existing open space.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
17
Potential Funding Strategies and Financing Tools – Tax Increment Financing through Urban Renewal
The Master Plan recognizes that Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) as a major tool that can be used to fund projects, and that creating it through an Urban Renewal Area for the campus authorizes the use of TIF for the removal of blight conditions.
• The URA can use TIF to pay for eligible redevelopment and public
improvement costs associated with the project. TIF redirects the
incremental property taxes from all taxing entities from a new
development within a defined URA to pay for eligible expenses including
extraordinary costs for remediation.
Development Standards and Procedures
All development within the Plan Area shall conform to the City’s Land Use Code
and any site-specific City zoning regulations and policies that might impact
properties in the Plan Area, all as in effect and as may be amended. However, as
authorized by the Urban Renewal Law, the Authority may arrange with the City
for the planning, replanning, zoning or rezoning of any part of the Plan Area as
needed in connection with the urban renewal project described in this Plan.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
18
Authorized Urban Renewal Undertakings
and Activities
The Act allows for a wide range of activities to be used in the implementation of
an urban renewal plan. The Authority is authorized to provide both financial
assistance and improvements in partnership with property owners and other
affected parties in order to accomplish the objectives stated herein. Public private
partnerships and other forms of cooperative development, including Cooperation
Agreements, will be essential to the Authority’s strategy for preventing the spread
of blight and eliminating existing blighting conditions. Without limitation,
undertakings and activities of the Authority in the furtherance of this Plan as
described as follows.
Undertakings and Activities to Remedy Blight
As described in Section 4 of this Plan, six qualifying conditions of blight were
identified in the Study Area of which this Urban Renewal Areas is a part.
Implementation of this Plan by providing urban renewal resources for public and
private improvements will remedy the conditions identified:
b. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout
The Plan Area is large, at over 100 acres, and the private investment of
improved road conditions and incorporating bicycle and pedestrian
pathways throughout the site will create an improved pedestrian
environment.
c. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or
usefulness
The development and improvement of the Plan Area as a whole will
provide internal vehicular access and connectivity.
d. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions
Private investments, onsite development, occupation, and operations will
eliminate vandalism/graffiti, presence of vagrants, and excessive litter.
Further, improved bicycle and pedestrian pathways will correct and
prevent cracked or uneven surfaces for pedestrians.
e. Deterioration of site or other improvements
The development of the Plan Area will turn an underutilized and neglected
property into a thriving mixed-use development with the necessary site
improvement.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
19
f. Unusual topography or inadequate public improvements or utilities
The unusual topography observed along the Rocky Mountain Ditch will
likely be preserved and improved by providing a walking trail or other
active and passive open space use to enhance natural features of the Plan
Area. Overall development of the site will also allow periodic maintenance
of deteriorated public improvements or utilities.
k.5. The existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high levels
of municipal services or substantial physical underutilization or
vacancy of sites, building, or other improvements
The Plan Area is currently underdeveloped and following the relocation of
the hospital and associated offices, most of the Plan Area will become
vacant. Through private investment and support from the Authority, the
Plan Area will develop into a vibrant property and be fully utilized.
Project Development Plan
The primary goal of this Plan is to eliminate the current conditions of blight in the
Urban Renewal Area and prevent those conditions from reoccurring. The
contemplated redevelopment of the Area is for use as a mixed-use development;
provided however, the Authority is authorized to approve any uses for the Area
that eliminate blight and are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Master
Plan, and applicable zoning, including, without limitation, mixed use development,
including residential, hotel, commercial, retail, office, industrial, cultural, and
public uses.
Complete Public Improvements and Facilities
The Authority may undertake certain actions to make the Area more attractive for
private investment. The Authority may, or may cause others, including, without
limitation, one or more Districts to install, construct, and reconstruct any public
improvements, including, without limitation, parking facilities. The Authority may,
or may cause others to, demolish and clear buildings and existing improvements
for the purpose of promoting the objectives of the Plan and the Act. Additionally,
the Authority may, or may cause others to, install, construct and reconstruct any
other authorized improvements, including, without limitation, other authorized
undertakings or improvements for the purpose of promoting the objectives of this
Plan and the Act.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
20
Plan Modification
The Authority may propose, and City Council may make, modifications to this Plan
as may be necessary; provided, however, any modification of the Plan shall (a)
comply with the provisions of the Act, including C.R.S. §31-25-107(7); (b) not
impair Available Revenues then-pledged by the Authority or the ability of the
Authority to pay any outstanding Bonds, including any reimbursement obligations
of the Authority; or (c) not impair the ability of the Authority or any party to any
then-existing agreement to fully perform their respective covenants and duties
under any such agreement. The Authority may, in specific cases, allow non-
substantive variations from the provisions of this Plan if it determines that a literal
enforcement or application of the provision would constitute an unreasonable
limitation beyond the intent and purpose stated herein.
Provide Relocation Assistance
While it is not anticipated as of the date of this Plan that acquisition of real
property will result in the relocation of any individuals, families, or business
concerns; if such relocation becomes necessary, the Authority will adopt a
relocation plan as necessary to comply with applicable provisions of the Act.
Demolition, Clear and Prepare Improvements
The Authority is authorized to demolish or cooperate with others to clear
buildings, structures, and other improvements within the Area in an effort to
advance projects deemed consistent with the vision stated herein. Such
demolition or site clearance is necessary to eliminate unhealthy, unsanitary, and
unsafe conditions; eliminate obsolete uses deemed detrimental to the public
welfare; remove and prevent the spread of blight; and facilitate redevelopment of
the Area by private enterprise.
Acquire and Dispose of Property
It is not expected that the Authority will be required to acquire property to carry
out the project. However, if the Authority determines such acquisition is necessary,
it is authorized to acquire any such property by negotiation or any other method,
including that the Authority is authorized to acquire property by eminent domain.
Properties acquired by the Authority by negotiation may be temporarily operated,
managed and maintained by the Authority if requested to do so by the acquiring
entity and deemed in the best interest of the Urban Renewal Project and the Plan.
Such property shall be under the management and control of the Authority and
may be rented or leased pending its disposition for redevelopment.
The Authority may sell, lease, or otherwise transfer real property or any interest
in real property subject to covenants, conditions and restrictions, including
architectural and design controls, time restrictions on development, and building
requirements in accordance with the Act and this Plan.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
21
Enter into Redevelopment/Development Agreements
The Authority may enter into Redevelopment/Development Agreements or other
contracts with developer(s) or property owners or other such individuals or entities
determined to be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan, including the
pledge by the Authority of Available Revenues to pay eligible costs pursuant to
the Act or any other applicable law. Further, such Redevelopment/Development
Agreements, or other contracts, may contain terms, provisions, activities, and
undertakings contemplated by this Plan and the Act. Any existing agreements
between the City and private parties that are consistent with this Plan are
intended to remain in full force and effect unless all parties to such agreements
agree otherwise.
Enter into Cooperation Agreements
The Authority is authorized to enter into such Cooperation Agreements as may be
required by the Act, including tax sharing agreements. The Authority may also
use the mediation and other provisions of the Act when necessary to provide
adequate financing to carry out this Plan. This paragraph shall not be construed to
require any particular form of cooperation.
Other Project Undertakings and Activities
Other project undertakings and activities deemed necessary by the Authority to
carry out the Plan may be undertaken and performed by the Authority or pursuant
to agreements with other parties or public bodies in accordance with the
authorization of the Act and any applicable law or laws.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
22
Project Financing
Financing Powers
Except as hereafter specifically provided, the undertakings and activities of the
urban renewal project described in this Plan may be financed, in whole or in part,
by the Authority to the full extent authorized under the TIF provisions of C.R.S. §
31-25-107(9)(a) in the Urban Renewal Law, as amended, and with any other
available sources of revenues and means of financing authorized to be undertaken
by the Authority pursuant to the Urban Renewal Law and under any other
applicable law, which shall include, without limitation:
• The collection and use of revenues from property tax increment, sales tax
increment, interest income, federal loans or grants, agreements with public,
quasi-public, or private parties and entities, loans or advances from any other
available source, and any other available sources of revenue.
• The issuance of bonds and other indebtedness, including, without limitation,
notes or any other financing instruments or documents in amounts sufficient
to finance all or part of the Plan. The borrowing of funds and creation of other
indebtedness.
• The use of any and all financing methods legally available to the City, the
Authority, any private developer, redeveloper, or owner to finance in whole or
in part any and all costs, including without limitation the cost of public
improvements, described or anticipated in the Plan or in any manner related
or incidental to the development of the Plan Area. Such methods may be
combined to finance all or part of activities and undertakings throughout the
Plan Area.
• The principal, interest, any premiums and any other amounts legally due on or
in connection with any indebtedness or obligation of the Authority may be paid
from property tax increments, sales tax increments or any other funds,
revenues, assets or property legally available to the Authority.
This Plan contemplates, however, that the primary method of assisting with
financing eligible expenses in the Plan Area will be through the use of
revenues generated by Property Tax Increment and Sales Tax Increment. It is
the intent of the City Council in approving this Plan to authorize the use of TIF
by the Authority as part of its efforts to advance the vision, objectives, and
activities described herein.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
23
Tax Increment Financing District
Pursuant to the provisions of C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9) of the Urban Renewal Law, in
approving this Plan, the City Council hereby approves the Plan Area as a single tax
increment financing district with the same boundary as the Plan Area (the “TIF
District”). The boundaries of this TIF District shall therefore be as depicted in
Figure 1 and described on Exhibit A.
Property Tax Increment Financing
The Authority is specifically authorized to collect and expend property tax
increment revenue to the full extent authorized by the Urban Renewal Law and to
use that revenue for all purposes authorized under this Plan.
Property Tax Increment Limitations
The Authority shall establish a fund for the financing authorized under this Plan
that shall be funded with the property tax allocation authorized to the Authority
under the Urban Renewal Law in C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9). Under this method, the
property taxes of specifically designated public bodies, if any, levied after the
effective date of the approval of this Plan upon taxable property in the Plan Area
each year by or for the benefit of the designated public body must be divided for
a period not to exceed twenty-five (25) years after the effective date of the
adoption of the tax allocation provision, as follows:
Base Amount – That portion of the taxes that are produced by the levy at the
rate fixed each year by or for such public body upon the valuation for assessment
of taxable property in the Plan Area last certified prior to the effective date of
approval of the Plan or, as to an area later added to the Plan Area, the effective
date of the modification of the Plan, shall be paid into the funds of each such
public body as are all other taxes collected by or for said public body.
Increment Amount – That portion of said property taxes in excess of such base
amount must be allocated to and, when collected, paid into a special fund of the
Authority to pay the principal of, the interest on, and any premiums due in
connection with the bonds of, loans or advances to, or indebtedness incurred by,
whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise, the Authority for financing or
refinancing, in whole or in part, a specific project. Any excess property tax
collections not allocated in this way must be paid into the funds of the
municipality or other taxing entity, as applicable.
Unless and until the total valuation for assessment of the taxable property in the
Plan Area exceeds the base valuation for assessment of the taxable property in
the Plan Area, all of the taxes levied upon the taxable property in the Plan Area
must be paid into the funds of the respective public bodies.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
24
When such bonds, loans, advances, and indebtedness, if any, including interest
thereon and any premiums due in connection therewith, have been paid, all taxes
upon the taxable property in the Plan Area must be paid into the funds of the
respective public bodies, and all moneys remaining in the special fund that have
not previously been rebated and that originated as property tax increment
generated based on the mill levy of a taxing body, other than the City, within the
boundaries of the Plan Area must be repaid to each taxing body based on the pro
rata share of the prior year’s property tax increment attributable to each taxing
body’s current mill levy in which property taxes were divided. Any moneys
remaining in the special fund not generated by property tax increment are
excluded from any such repayment requirement. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, revenues excluded by C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9)(a)(II) of the Act
are not intended to be included in Available Property Tax Increment Revenues.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any additional revenues the City,
county, special district, or school district receives either because the voters have
authorized the City, county, special district, or school district to retain and spend
said moneys pursuant to section 20(7)(d) of Article X of the Colorado Constitution
subsequent to the creation of this special fund or as a result of an increase in the
property tax mill levy approved by the voters of the City, county, special district,
or school district subsequent to the creation of the special fund, to the extent the
total mill levy of the City, county, special district, or school district exceeds the
respective mill levy in effect at the time of approval or substantial modification of
the Plan, are not included in the amount of the increment that is allocated to and,
when collected, paid into the special fund of the authority.
In calculating and making these payments, the County Treasurer may offset the
Authority’s pro rata portion of any property taxes that are paid to the Authority
under these terms and that are subsequently refunded to the taxpayer against
any subsequent payments due to the Authority for an urban renewal project. The
Authority shall make adequate provision for the return of overpayments in the
event that there are not sufficient property taxes due to the Authority to offset
the Authority’s pro rata portion of the refunds. The Authority may establish a
reserve fund for this purpose or enter into an intergovernmental agreement with
the municipal governing body in which the municipality assumes responsibility for
the return of the overpayments.
The portion of taxes collected may be irrevocably pledged by the Authority for the
payment of the principal of, the interest on, and any premiums due in connection
with such bonds, loans, advances, and indebtedness. This irrevocable pledge shall
not extend to any taxes that are placed in a reserve fund to be returned to the
county for refunds of overpayments by taxpayers or any reserve funds reserved
by the Authority for such purposes in accordance with C.R.S. § 31-25-
107(9)(a)(III) and (b). The Authority shall set aside and reserve a reasonable
amount as determined by the Authority of all incremental taxes paid to the
Authority for payment of expenses associated with administering the Plan.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
25
At the time of general reassessment of taxable property valuations in Jefferson
County, including all or part of the Plan Area subject to division of valuation for
assessment between base and increment, as provided above, the portions of
valuations for assessment to be allocated as provided above shall be
proportionately adjusted in accordance with such reassessment or change. Note
that at the time of this Plan adoption, such a general reassessment occurs every
two years, in the odd-numbered years.
Sales Tax Increment Financing
The urban renewal project under the Plan may also be financed by the Authority
under the sales tax allocation financing provisions of the Urban Renewal Law in
C.R.S. § 31-25-107(9). The Urban Renewal Law allows that upon the adoption or
amendment of an Urban Renewal Plan, sales taxes flowing to the city and/or
county may be “frozen” at their current level. The current level is established
based on the previous 12 months prior to the adoption of this Plan. Thereafter,
the jurisdiction can continue to receive this fixed sales tax revenue. The Authority
thereafter may receive all, or an agreed upon portion of the additional sales taxes
(the increment) that are generated above the base. The Authority may use these
incremental revenues to finance the issuance of bonds, reimburse developers for
public improvement costs, reimburse the city for public improvement costs, and
pay off financial obligations and other debts incurred in the administration of the
Plan. This increment is not an additional sales tax, but rather is a portion of the
established tax collected by the jurisdiction, and the sales tax increment resulting
from redevelopment efforts and activities contemplated in this Plan.
Sales Tax Increment Limitations
A fund for financing projects may be accrued and used by the Authority under the
tax allocation financing provisions of the Urban Renewal Law. Under this method,
municipal sales taxes collected within the Plan Area, by or for the benefit of the
designated public body must be divided for a period not to exceed twenty-five
(25) years after the effective date of the adoption of the tax allocation provision,
as follows:
Base Amount – That portion of sales taxes, not including any sales taxes for
remote sales as specified in C.R.S. § 39-26-104 (2), collected within the boundaries
of the Plan Area in the twelve-month period ending on the last day of the month
prior to the effective date of approval of the Plan, shall be paid into the funds of
each such public body as are all other taxes collected by or for said public body.
Increment Amount – All or any portion of said sales taxes in excess of such
base amount, must be allocated to and, when collected, paid into a special fund of
the Authority to pay the principal of, the interest on, and any premiums due in
connection with the bonds of, loans or advances to, or indebtedness incurred by,
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
26
whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise, the Authority for financing or
refinancing, in whole or in part, a specific project. Any excess sales tax collections
not allocated in this way must be paid into the funds of the jurisdiction, as
applicable.
Unless and until the total sales tax collections in the Plan Area exceed the base
year sales tax collections in the Plan Area, all such sales tax collections must be
paid into the funds of the respective taxing entity.
The portion of taxes collected may be irrevocably pledged by the Authority for the
payment of the principal of, the interest on, and any premiums due in connection
with such bonds, loans, advances, and indebtedness. This irrevocable pledge shall
not extend to any taxes that are placed in a reserve fund to be returned to the
county for refunds of overpayments by taxpayers or any reserve funds reserved
by the Authority for such purposes in accordance with C.R.S. § 31-25-
107(9)(a)(III) and (b). The Authority shall set aside and reserve a reasonable
amount as determined by the Authority of all incremental taxes paid to the
Authority for payment of expenses associated with administering the Plan.
Tax Increment Reimbursements
Tax increment revenues may be used to reimburse the city and/or a developer for
costs incurred for improvements related to a project to pay the debt incurred by
the Authority with such entities for urban renewal activities and purposes. Tax
increment revenues may also be used to pay bonded indebtedness, financial
obligations, and debts of the Authority related to urban renewal activities under
this Plan.
Within the 12-month period prior to the effective date of the approval or
modification of the Plan requiring the allocation of moneys to the Authority as
outlined previously, the city, county, special district, or school district is entitled to
the reimbursement of any moneys that such city, county, special district, or
school district pays to, contributes to, or invests in the Authority for a project. The
reimbursement is to be paid from the special fund of the Authority.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
27
Severability and Reasonable Variations
The Authority shall have the ability to approve reasonable variations (as
determined by the Board) from the strict application of these Plan provisions, so
long as such variations reasonably accommodate the intent and purpose of this
Plan and the Urban Renewal Law. Plan provisions may be altered by market
conditions, redevelopment opportunities and/or the needs of the community
affected by the Plan.
If any portion of this Plan is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity
will not affect the remaining portions of the Plan.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan
28
Effective Date of the Plan
This Plan shall be effective upon its final approval by the City Council. Except as
otherwise permitted under the Urban Renewal Law, the term of the TIF period is
twenty-five (25) years from the effective date of the Plan, unless the Authority
deems, to the extent consistent with the terms in the applicable, agreements,
including, without, limitation, Redevelopment/ Development Agreements and
Cooperation Agreements, that all activities to accomplish the Project have been
completed and all debts incurred to finance such activities and all expenses of the
Authority have been repaid. In that event, the Authority may declare the Plan
fully implemented.
Matrix Design Group, Inc.
2435 Research Parkway, Suite 300
Colorado Springs, CO 80920
O 719.575.0100
F 719.575.0208
matrixdesigngroup.com
Anniston, AL | Atlanta, GA | Colorado Springs, CO | Denver, CO | Niceville, FL | Parsons, KS | Phoenix, AZ
Sacramento, CA | Tamuning, GUAM | Texarkana, TX | Washington, DC
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TWO PARCELS OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO; MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS WITH BEARINGS
REFERENCED TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE, SECTIONS 26 AND 27, TOWNSHIP 3
SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, IS ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 89°40'03" EAST;
PARCEL A
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF WAY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE;
THENCE NORTH 89°40'03" EAST, COINCIDENT WITH SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF
1,832.06 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 12°53'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 61.26 FEET TO THE EXTERIOR OF THAT QUIT CLAIM DEED
RECORDED APRIL 84, 2022 IN SAID RECORDS UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 2022031541;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH SAID QUIT CLAIM DEED THE FOLLOWING (2) TWO COURSES;
1. SOUTH 00°31'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,266.87 FEET;
2. SOUTH 89°55'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 333.84 FEET;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH THE EXTERIOR OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN WATER COMPANY DITCH, RECORDED APRIL
29, 2009 IN SAID RECORDS UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 2009037470, THE FOLLOWING (15) FIFTEEN COURSES;
1. SOUTH 71°16'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 75.62 FEET;
2. SOUTH 67°16'19" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 522.18 FEET;
3. SOUTH 62°00'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 221.74 FEET;
4. SOUTH 52°15'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 171.75 FEET;
5. SOUTH 55°23'17" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 250.12 FEET;
6. SOUTH 55°25'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 146.95 FEET;
7. SOUTH 57°54'53" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 58.88 FEET;
8. SOUTH 60°29'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 64.43 FEET;
9. SOUTH 00°12'48" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 71.91 FEET;
10. NORTH 50°48'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 22.73 FEET;
11. NORTH 47°50'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.03 FEET;
12. NORTH 54°45'43" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 490.20 FEET;
13. SOUTH 00°17'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 26.25 FEET;
14. NORTH 49°02'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 274.69 FEET;
15. NORTH 66°19'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 590.21 FEET;
16. NORTH 74°15'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 145.70 FEET TO THE EXTERIOR OF SAID QUIT CLAIM DEED;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH SAID QUIT CLAIM DEED THE FOLLOWING (9) NINE COURSES;
1. SOUTH 00°00'51" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 865.66 FEET;
2. NORTH 89°51'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 777.71 FEET;
3. NORTH 00°24'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.20 FEET;
4. THENCE NORTH 89°13'17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 130.90 FEET;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONT…
R:\23.636.005 URA LEGAL - LUTHERAN LEGACY\400 SURVEY\400 CADD\405 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS\LEGAL DESCRIPTION.DOCX
Page 2
5. THENCE SOUTH 00°01'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 418.08 FEET;
6. SOUTH 89°54'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 621.03 FEET;
7. NORTH 00°27'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 414.22 FEET;
8. SOUTH 88°57'17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 194.78 FEET;
9. NORTH 00°04'23" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3.42 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°38'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 408.03 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DUDLEY
STREET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°26'01" EAST, COINCIDENT WITH SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 475.09
FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 32ND AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTH 89°58'13" WEST, COINCINDENT WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 32ND
AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 53.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°01'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 69.68 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DUDLEY
STREET;
THENCE NORTH 00°03'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,640.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF SAID WEST 38TH AVENUE AND SAID DUDLEY STREET;
THENCE NORTH 88°57'45" EAST COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID WEST 38TH AVENUE,
A DISTANCE OF 142.49 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°37'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 440.39 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 84°59'52" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 57.34 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°06'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 114.87 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°48’02” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 195.04 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID DUDLEY
STREET;
THENCE NORTH 00°03’00” EAST COINCIDENT WITH SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 558.33 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE EXCEPTED PARCEL .
THE NET CALCULATED AREA OF PARCEL A CONTAINS 4,717,804 SQUARE FEET OR (108.305 ACRES), MORE OR LESS,
AND IS DEPICTED ON THE ATTACHED GRAPHICAL EXHIBIT FOR REFERENCE.
PARCEL B
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF SAID DUDLEY STREET AND WEST 32ND AVENUE;
THENCE NORTH 00°26'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF SAID DUDLEY
STREET AND SAID WEST 32ND AVENUE;
THENCE COINCIDENT WITH THE EXTERIOR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES OF SAID WEST 32ND AVENUE THE FOLLOWING (5)
FIVE COURSES:
1. NORTH 89°47'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,091.58 FEET;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONT…
R:\23.636.005 URA LEGAL - LUTHERAN LEGACY\400 SURVEY\400 CADD\405 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS\LEGAL DESCRIPTION.DOCX
Page 3
2.NORTH 00°16'48" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 410.87 FEET;
3.SOUTH 89°51'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.85 FEET;
4.SOUTH 00°05'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 465.61 FEET;
5.SOUTH 89°47'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,131.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION CONTAINS A CALCULATED AREA OF 133,469 SQUARE FEET OR (3.06401 ACRES), MORE
OR LESS, AND IS DEPICTED ON THE ATTACHED GRAPHICAL EXHIBIT FOR REFERENCE.
JERRY R. BESSIE, PLS 38576
PREPARED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MATRIX DESIGN GROUP
2435 RESEARCH PARKWAY, SUITE 300
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO. 80920
05/08/2024
N.W. 1/4
S.W. 1/4S.W. 1/4
SECTION 26
T3 S, R69 W
N.E. 1/4
SECTION 27
T3 S, R69 W
POINT OF BEGINNING
PARCEL A
WEST 38TH AVENUE
DU
D
L
E
Y
S
T
R
E
E
T
AL
L
I
S
O
N
C
O
U
R
T
AL
L
I
S
O
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
ZE
P
H
Y
R
C
O
U
R
T
POINT OF BEGINNING
EXCEPTED PORTION
PARCEL A
POINT OF
BEGINNING
PARCEL B
L1
L2
L3
L4 L5
L6
L7 L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L1
3
L14
L15
L
1
6
L17
L
1
8
L19L20
L2
1
L22
L23L24
L26
L2
7
L28
L29
L30
L3
1
L32
L3
3
L3
4
L2
5
L45 L40
L4
1
L42
L4
3
L44
WEST 32ND AVENUE
PARCEL A
PARCEL B
L35
L3
6
L37
L3
8
L39
L4
6
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
R:
\
2
3
.
6
3
6
.
0
0
5
U
R
A
L
e
g
a
l
-
L
u
t
h
e
r
a
n
L
e
g
a
c
y
\
4
0
0
S
u
r
v
e
y
\
4
0
0
C
A
D
D
\
4
0
5
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
\
9
3
6
.
0
0
5
-
S
U
R
V
-
L
U
T
H
E
R
A
N
-
G
R
.
d
w
g
PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY:
SCALE:
DATE:SHEET: OF 6
EXHIBIT A
LAND DESCRIPTION
JRB
1"=500'
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
NET AREA PARCEL A: 4,717,804 SQUARE FEET (108.305 ACRES), MORE OR LESS
PARCEL B: 13,469 SQUARE FEET (3.06401 ACRES), MORE OR LESS
4
PARCEL TABLE
PARCEL DESCRIPTION REC. NO.
A SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 23910528
B LOT 1, FOOTHILLS MEDICAL CENTER FINAL PLAT 87042655
C QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
D WARRANTY DEED 81042853
E QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
F QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
G QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
H QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
I QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
J QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
K QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
L QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
M QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
N QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
O QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
P LUCOCK SUBDIVISION 52520515
Q QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
R QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
S EXEMPLA / LUTHERAN HOSPICE FINAL PLAT 2005024146
T EXEMPLA / LUTHERAN HOSPICE FINAL PLAT 2005024146
U BLOCK 17, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION 41322356
V LOT 17, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION 41322356
W LOT 18, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION 41322356
X LOT 19, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION 41322356
Y LOT 20, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION 41322356
Z LOT 21, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION 41322356
AA LOT 22, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION 41322356
AB LOT 23, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION 41322356
AC LOT 24, LONGVIEW SUBDIVISION 41322356
AD 35TH AVENUE ROW, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AE STREET DEDICATION, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AF LOT 1, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AG LOT 2, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AH LOT 3, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AI LOT 4, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AJ LOT 5, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AK LOT 6, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AL LOT 7, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AM LOT 8, LUTHERAN SUBDIVISION 81068093
AN 35TH AVENUE ROW
AO ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH ROW 2009037470
AP ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH ROW 2009037470
AQ ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH ROW 2009037470
AR QUIT CLAIM DEED 2022031541
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
R:
\
2
3
.
6
3
6
.
0
0
5
U
R
A
L
e
g
a
l
-
L
u
t
h
e
r
a
n
L
e
g
a
c
y
\
4
0
0
S
u
r
v
e
y
\
4
0
0
C
A
D
D
\
4
0
5
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
\
9
3
6
.
0
0
5
-
S
U
R
V
-
L
U
T
H
E
R
A
N
-
G
R
.
d
w
g
PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY:
SCALE:
DATE:SHEET: OF 6
EXHIBIT A
LAND DESCRIPTION
JRB
1"=500'
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
NET AREA PARCEL A: 4,717,804 SQUARE FEET (108.305 ACRES), MORE OR LESS
PARCEL B: 13,469 SQUARE FEET (3.06401 ACRES), MORE OR LESS
5
LINE TABLE
LINE #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22
L23
BEARING
N89°40'03"E
S12°53'32"E
S00°31'59"E
S89°55'13"E
S71°16'42"E
S67°16'19"E
S62°00'10"E
S52°15'27"E
S55°23'17"E
S55°25'27"E
S57°54'53"E
S60°29'59"E
S00°12'48"E
N50°48'20"W
N47°50'12"W
N54°45'43"W
S00°17'10"E
N49°02'09"W
N66°19'10"W
N74°15'03"W
S00°00'51"W
N89°51'09"W
N00°24'02"W
DISTANCE
1832.06
61.26
1266.87
333.84
75.62
522.18
221.74
171.75
250.12
146.95
58.88
64.43
71.91
22.73
20.03
490.20
26.25
274.69
590.21
145.70
865.66
777.71
5.20
LINE TABLE
LINE #
L24
L25
L26
L27
L28
L29
L30
L31
L32
L33
L34
L35
L36
L37
L38
L39
L40
L41
L42
L43
L44
L45
L46
BEARING
N89°13'17"W
S00°01'31"E
S89°54'35"W
N00°27'45"W
S88°57'17"W
N00°04'23"W
S89°38'38"W
S00°26'01"E
S89°58'13"W
N00°01'47"W
N00°03'19"W
N88°57'45"E
S00°37'42"W
S84°59'52"E
S00°06'07"W
S89°48'02"W
N89°47'00"E
N00°16'48"E
S89°51'09"E
S00°05'27"W
S89°47'00"W
N00°26'00"W
N00°03'00"E
DISTANCE
130.90
418.08
621.03
414.22
194.78
3.42
408.03
475.09
53.59
69.68
2640.56
142.49
440.39
57.34
114.87
195.04
2091.58
410.87
38.85
465.61
2131.29
55.00
558.33
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
R:
\
2
3
.
6
3
6
.
0
0
5
U
R
A
L
e
g
a
l
-
L
u
t
h
e
r
a
n
L
e
g
a
c
y
\
4
0
0
S
u
r
v
e
y
\
4
0
0
C
A
D
D
\
4
0
5
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
\
9
3
6
.
0
0
5
-
S
U
R
V
-
L
U
T
H
E
R
A
N
-
G
R
.
d
w
g
PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY:
SCALE:
DATE:SHEET: OF 6
EXHIBIT A
LAND DESCRIPTION
JRB
1"=500'
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
NET AREA PARCEL A: 4,717,804 SQUARE FEET (108.305 ACRES), MORE OR LESS
PARCEL B: 13,469 SQUARE FEET (3.06401 ACRES), MORE OR LESS
6
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing
Conditions Survey
Prepared for:
Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority dba Renewal Wheat Ridge
and the City of Wheat Ridge
Prepared by:
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
August 29, 2023
EPS #223132
ATTACHMENT 3
Table of Contents
1.Introduction ............................................................................................. 1
Purpose ....................................................................................................... 1
Colorado Urban Renewal Law .......................................................................... 1
Methodology ................................................................................................ 4
2.Study Area Analysis .................................................................................. 5
Study Area ................................................................................................... 5
Field Survey Approach ................................................................................... 8
Blight Factor Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................... 8
Results of Field Survey ................................................................................ 11
3.Conclusions ............................................................................................ 23
List of Tables
Table 1. Parcels Contained in the Study Area ........................................................ 5
Table 2. Blight Conditions in Study Area ............................................................. 11
List of Figures
Figure 1. Lutheran Legacy Campus Proposed Urban Renewal Boundary and Parcels ..... 6
Figure 2. Lutheran Medical Center ........................................................................ 7
Figure 3. Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Pedestrians ................................ 12
Figure 4. Poor Internal Vehicular or Pedestrian Circulation ...................................... 14
Figure 5. Poor Vehicular Access .......................................................................... 15
Figure 6. Cracked or Uneven Surfaces for Pedestrians ........................................... 16
Figure 7. Vandalism/Graffiti ............................................................................... 16
Figure 8. Excessive Litter .................................................................................. 17
Figure 9. Open Ditches/Trenches in Pedestrian Areas ............................................ 17
Figure 10. Neglected Properties or Evidence of Maintenance Deficiencies .................... 18
Figure 11. Deteriorated Signage or Lighting ........................................................... 18
Figure 12. Deteriorated On-site Parking Surfaces, Curb and Gutter, or Sidewalks ........ 19
Figure 13. Unpaved Parking Lot ........................................................................... 20
Figure 14. Deteriorated Lighting ........................................................................... 20
Figure 15. Deteriorated Pavement, Curbs, and Sidewalks ......................................... 21
Figure 16. Underdeveloped in a Generally Urbanized Area ........................................ 22
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
223132-Draft Report_Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey 8-20-2025 1
1. Introduction
In February 2023, Economic & Planning Systems (EPS), working with the City of
Wheat Ridge, conducted the following existing conditions survey (Survey) of the
proposed Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Plan Area known as the Lutheran Legacy
Campus Urban Renewal Plan Area (Study Area). This proposed plan area is
located at 8300 W. 38th Avenue and consists of approximately 112 acres. The
Study Area is bound by West 32nd Avenue to the south, West 38th Avenue to the
north, Allison Street to the east, and Dudley Street to the west, as shown in
Figure 1 on page 6.
The proposed Urban Renewal Area captures the Lutheran Legacy Campus Master
Plan area and, if approved, will aide in supporting the redevelopment of the site
and enable needed public improvements to be constructed in the area.
Purpose
The primary purpose of this Survey is to determine whether the Study Area
qualifies as a “blighted area” within the meaning of Colorado Urban Renewal Law.
Secondly, this Survey will influence whether the Study Area should be
recommended to be established as an urban renewal plan area for such urban
renewal activities, as the City Council and Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority
dba Renewal Wheat Ridge (URA) deem appropriate.
Colorado Urban Renewal Law
The requirements for the establishment of an urban renewal plan are outlined in
the Colorado Urban Renewal Law, Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) § 31‐25‐101
et seq. In order to establish an area for urban renewal, there are an array of
conditions that must be documented to establish a condition of blight. The
determination that constitutes a blighted area depends upon the presence of
several physical, environmental, and social factors. Blight is attributable to a
multiplicity of conditions which, in combination, tend to accelerate the
phenomenon of deterioration of an area and prevent new development from
occurring.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
2
Urban Renewal Law
Blight Factors (C.R.S. § 31-25-103)
“’Blighted area’ means an area that, in its present condition and use and, by reason of the
presence of at least four of the following factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound
growth of the municipality, retards the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes
an economic or social liability, and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare:
(a) Slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures;
(b) Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout;
(c) Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness;
(d) Unsanitary or unsafe conditions;
(e) Deterioration of site or other improvements;
(f) Unusual topography or inadequate public improvements or utilities;
(g) Defective or unusual conditions of title rendering the title nonmarketable;
(h) The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other causes;
(I) Buildings that are unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work in because of building
code violations, dilapidation, deterioration, defective design, physical construction, or faulty or
inadequate facilities;
(j) Environmental contamination of buildings or property;
(k.5) The existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high levels of municipal
services or substantial physical underutilization or vacancy of sites, buildings, or other
improvements; or
(l) If there is no objection by the property owner or owners and the tenant or tenants of such
owner or owners, if any, to the inclusion of such property in an urban renewal area, “blighted
area” also means an area that, in its present condition and use and, by reason of the
presence of any one of the factors specified in paragraphs (a) to (k.5) of this subsection (2),
substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the municipality, retards the provision of
housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability, and is a menace to
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. For purposes of this paragraph (l), the fact that
an owner of an interest in such property does not object to the inclusion of such property in
the urban renewal area does not mean that the owner has waived any rights of such owner in
connection with laws governing condemnation.”
Use of Eminent Domain
In order for an Urban Renewal Authority to use the powers of eminent domain to acquire
properties, 5 of the 11 blight factors must be present (C.R.S. § 31‐25‐105.5(a)).
“’Blighted area’ shall have the same meaning as set forth in section 31‐25‐103 (2); except
that, for the purposes of this section only, “blighted area” means an area that, in its present
condition and use and, by reason of the presence of at least five of the factors specified in
section 31‐25‐103 (2)(a) to (2)(l), substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the
municipality, retards the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or
social liability, and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare.”
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
3
Urban Renewal Case Law
In addition to the State statute, several principles have been developed by
Colorado courts to guide the determination of whether an area constitutes a
blighted area under the Urban Renewal Law. The following parameters have
been established through case law for determining blight and the role of
judiciary review.
Tracy v. City of Boulder (Colo. Ct. App. 1981)
• Upheld the definition of blight presented in the Urban Renewal Law as a
broad condition encompassing not only those areas containing properties
so dilapidated as to justify condemnation as nuisances, but also envisioning
the prevention of deterioration. Therefore, the existence of widespread
nuisance violations and building condemnation is not required to designate
an area blighted.
• Additionally, the determination of blight is the responsibility of the
legislative body and a court’s role in review is to verify if the conclusion is
based upon factual evidence determined by the City Council at the time of
a public hearing to be consistent with the statutory definition.
Interstate Trust Building Co. v. Denver Urban Renewal Authority (Colo. 1970)
• Determined that blight assessment is not on a building-to-building basis
but is based on conditions observed throughout the plan area as a whole.
The presence of one well maintained building does not defeat a
determination that an area constitutes a blighted area.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
4
Methodology
This Survey was completed by EPS to inventory and establish the existing
conditions within the Study Area through data gathering and field observations of
physical conditions. The Study Area was defined by the URA to encompass the
proposed redevelopment of the Lutheran Medical Campus, which is comprised of
20 parcels located in Wheat Ridge, between West 32nd Avenue and West 38th
Avenue, and between Allison Street and Dudley Street. An inventory of parcels
within the Study Area was compiled using parcel data from the Jefferson County
Assessor, documenting parcel ownership, size, use, vacancy, and assessed value.
The field survey was conducted by EPS in February 2023. The 11 factors of blight
in the state statute were broken down into “conditions” - existing situations or
circumstances identified in the Study Area that may qualify as blight under each
of the 11 factors. The conditions documented in this report are submitted as
evidence to support a “finding of blight” according to Urban Renewal Law. Under
the Urban Renewal Law, the final determination of blight within the Study Area is
within the sole discretion of the Wheat Ridge City Council.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
223132-Draft Report_Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey 8-20-2025 5
2. Study Area Analysis
Study Area
The proposed Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan Area is comprised of
20 parcels on approximately 112 acres of land and adjacent right of way (ROW),
as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. The Study Area is bound by West 32nd Avenue
to the south, West 38th Avenue to the north, Allison Street to the east, and Dudley
Street to the west. Parcels in the Study Area are owned by the Sisters of Charity
of Leavenworth Health, Foothills Medical Building Company LLP, and the City and
County of Denver.
The parcels within the Study Area are a combination of hospital and medical
offices, parking for these facilities, vacant land, and water, as shown below. The
improvements in the Study Area include the hospital with 675,100 square feet
and various medical office buildings with a total of 111,000 square feet. The
Study Area also includes adjacent right-of-way (ROW) along West 38th Avenue,
West 32nd Avenue, Dudley Street, Allison Street, and the Rocky Mountain Ditch.
Table 1. Parcels Contained in the Study Area
Land Bldg.
#Parcel Land Use Acres Sq. Ft.Land Improv.Total
1 39-271-01-004 Medical Office 2.52 44,805 $635,663 $1,200,559 $1,836,222
2 39-262-00-021 Vacant 38.45 0 $499,822 $0 $499,822
3 39-262-00-045 Hospital 29.06 675,098 $377,761 $14,491,127 $14,868,888
4 39-262-00-041 Medical Office 0.40 46,454 $105,623 $1,612,303 $1,717,926
5 39-271-01-005 Vacant 0.01 0 $203 $0 $203
6 39-271-01-002 Vacant 2.79 0 $43,465 $0 $43,465
7 39-271-00-012 Parking 2.16 0 $136,431 $14,462 $150,893
8 39-262-00-011 Medical Office 0.00 0 $6,742 $102,913 $109,655
9 39-262-00-012 Vacant 3.30 0 $448,134 $0 $448,134
10 39-271-00-043 Vacant 0.32 0 $64,477 $0 $64,477
11 39-271-12-001 Vacant 2.52 0 $32,750 $0 $32,750
12 39-262-00-040 Medical Office 14.27 19,426 $1,938,278 $249,105 $2,187,383
13 39-262-99-001 Vacant 1.26 0 $5,828 $0 $5,828
14 39-262-00-044 Vacant 2.02 0 $26,260 $0 $26,260
15 39-271-00-042 Exempt Vacant 1.91 0 $8,839 $0 $8,839
16 39-262-08-007 Vacant 1.99 0 $25,830 $0 $25,830
17 39-262-08-006 Medical Office 2.00 638 $12,641 $9,606 $22,247
18 WATER Vacant 0.54 0 $0 $0 $0
19 WATER Vacant 0.43 0 $0 $0 $0
20 WATER Vacant 0.57 0 $0 $0 $0
ROW 5.49 0 $0 $0 $0
Total 112.00 786,421 $4,368,747 $17,680,075 $22,048,822
Source: Jefferson County Assessor; Economic & Planning Systems
Assessed Valuation
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
6
Figure 1. Lutheran Legacy Campus Proposed Urban Renewal Boundary and Parcels
The Study Area currently includes the Lutheran Medical Center and supporting
medical offices, shown below in Figure 2. The site itself has history dating back
to 1905, when it was originally used as a tent colony for tuberculosis patients. As
the need for tuberculosis treatment decreased, the medical facility shifted towards
general medicine, and in 1961 Lutheran Medical Center was established. The
medical center is home to Intermountain Healthcare, which will be vacating the
site and relocating to a new campus at Clear Creek Crossing in 2024.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
7
Figure 2. Lutheran Medical Center
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
8
Field Survey Approach
The following assessment is based on a field survey conducted by EPS. The survey
team toured the Study Area, taking notes and photographs to document existing
conditions corresponding to the blight factor evaluation criteria detailed in the
following section.
Blight Factor Evaluation Criteria
This section details the conditions used to evaluate blight during the field survey.
The following conditions correspond with 6 of the 11 blight factors in the Urban
Renewal Law. Additional information on a number of these factors for which data
was available was also collected. The remaining blight factors cannot be visually
inspected and are dependent on other data sources. Given the prevalence of
physically observable conditions of blight, these remaining blight factors were not
investigated.
Street Layout
The following conditions evaluate the Urban Renewal Law blight factor “(b)
predominance of defective or inadequate street layout,” through assessment of the
safety, quality, and efficiency of street layouts, site access, and internal circulation.
Typical examples of conditions that portray this criterion include:
• Inadequate street or alley width / cross-section / geometry
• Poor provision of streets or unsafe conditions for vehicular traffic
• Poor provision of sidewalks/walkways or unsafe conditions for pedestrians
• Insufficient roadway capacity
• Inadequate emergency vehicle access
• Poor vehicular or pedestrian access to buildings or sites
• Excessive curb cuts / driveways along commercial blocks
• Poor internal vehicular or pedestrian circulation
Lot Layout
The following conditions evaluate the Urban Renewal Law blight factor “(c) Faulty
lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness.”
Typical examples of conditions that portray this criterion include:
• Faulty or inadequate lot shape or layout
• Poor vehicular access
• Lot size is deemed unusable
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
9
Unsafe/Unsanitary
The following conditions establish evidence of Urban Renewal Law blight factor
“(d) unsanitary or unsafe conditions,” by evaluating visual conditions that indicate
the occurrence of activities that inhibit the safety and health of the area including,
but not limited to, excessive litter, unenclosed dumpsters, and vandalism.
Typical examples include:
• Floodplains or flood prone areas
• Inadequate storm drainage systems/evidence of standing water
• Poor fire protection facilities
• Above average incidences of public safety responses
• Inadequate sanitation or water systems
• Existence of contaminants or hazardous conditions or materials
• High or unusual crime statistics
• Open/unenclosed trash dumpsters
• Cracked or uneven surfaces for pedestrians
• Illegal dumping/excessive litter
• Vagrants/vandalism/graffiti/gang activity
• Open ditches, holes, or trenches in pedestrian areas
• Poorly lit or unlit areas
• Insufficient grading/steep slopes
• Unsafe or exposed electrical wire
Site Improvements
The following conditions evaluate the Urban Renewal Law blight factor “(e)
deterioration of site or other improvements,” by evidence of overall maintenance
deficiencies within the plan area including, deterioration, poorly maintained
landscaping, and overall neglect.
Examples of blighted site improvements include:
• Neglected properties or evidence of maintenance deficiencies
• Deteriorated signage or lighting
• Deteriorated fences, walls, or gates
• Deteriorated on-site parking surfaces, curb and gutter, or sidewalks
• Unpaved parking lot (commercial properties)
• Poor parking lot/driveway layout
• Poorly maintained landscaping/overgrown vegetation
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
10
Infrastructure
The observation of the following infrastructure insufficiencies is evidence of Urban
Renewal Law blight factor “(f) unusual topography or inadequate public
improvements or utilities.”
Prototypical features of blight under this topic include:
• Deteriorated pavement, curb, sidewalks, lighting, or drainage
• Lack of pavement, curb, sidewalks, lighting, or drainage
• Presence of overhead utilities or billboards
• Inadequate fire protection facilities/hydrants
• Inadequate sanitation or water systems
• Unusual topography
Vacancy
The following conditions are evidence of Urban Renewal Law blight factor “(k) the
existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high levels of municipal
services or substantial physical underutilization or vacancy of sites, buildings, or
other improvements.” Various examples of features that fulfill this criterion
include:
• An undeveloped parcel in a generally urbanized area
• Disproportionately underdeveloped parcel
• Vacant structures
• Vacant units in multi-unit structures
Other Considerations
The remaining five blight factors specified in the Urban Renewal Law were not
investigated further due to sufficient evidence from the visual field survey
supporting a condition of blight in 6 of the 11 blight factors.
(a) Slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures;
(g) Defective or unusual conditions of title rendering the title
nonmarketable.
(h) The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or
other causes.
(I) Buildings that are unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work in
because of building code violations, dilapidation, deterioration, defective
design, physical construction, or faulty or inadequate facilities.
(j) Environmental contamination of buildings or property,
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
11
Results of Field Survey
This section summarizes the findings of the visual field survey of the Study Area.
Table 2 documents the specific blight conditions observed. These conditions are
further explained following the table, for each specific category, and include
image documentation or supportive data.
Table 2. Blight Conditions in Study Area
2.01 Inadequate Street or Alley Width / Cross-section / Geometry
2.02 Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Vehicular Traffic
2.03 Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Pedestrians X
2.04 Insufficient Roadway Capacity Leading to Unusual Congestion
2.05 Inadequate Emergency Vehicle Access
2.06 Poor Vehicular or Pedestrian Access to Buildings or Sites
2.07 Excessive Curb Cuts / Driveways along Commercial Blocks
2.08 Poor Internal Vehicular or Pedestrian Circulation X
3.01 Faulty or inadequate lot shape or layout
3.02 Poor vehicular access X
3.03 Lot size is deemed not useful
4.01 Floodplains or Flood Prone Areas
4.02 Inadequate Storm Drainage Systems/Evidence of Standing Water
4.03 Poor Fire Protection Facilities
4.04 Above Average Incidences of Public Safety Responses
4.05 Inadequate Sanitation or Water Systems
4.06 Existence of Contaminants or Hazardous Conditions or Materials
4.07 High or Unusual Crime Statistics
4.08 Open / Unenclosed Trash Dumpsters
4.09 Cracked or Uneven Surfaces for Pedestrians X
4.10 Illegal Dumping / Excessive Litter X
4.11 Vagrants/Vandalism/Graffiti/Gang Activity X
4.12 Open Ditches, Holes, or Trenches in Pedestrian Areas X
5.01 Neglected Properties or Evidence of Maintenance Deficiencies X
5.02 Deteriorated Signage or Lighting X
5.03 Deteriorated Fences, Walls, or Gates
5.04 Deteriorated On-Site Parking Surfaces, Curb & Gutter, or Sidewalks X
5.05 Unpaved Parking Lot (Commercial Properties)X
5.06 Poor Parking Lot / Driveway Layout
5.07 Poorly Maintained Landscaping / Overgrown Vegetation
6.01 Deteriorated pavement, curb, sidewalks, lighting, or drainage X
6.02 Lack of pavement, curb, sidewalks, lighting, or drainage X
6.03 Presence of Overhead Utilities or Billboards
6.04 Inadequate Fire Protection Facilities / Hydrants
6.05 Inadequate Sanitation or Water Systems
6.06 Unusual Topography X
11.04 An Undeveloped Parcel in a Generally Urbanized Area X
11.05 Disproportionately Underdeveloped Parcel
11.06 Vacant Structures X
11.07 Vacant Units in Multi-Unit Structures
Va
c
a
n
c
y
Conditions Observed
St
r
e
e
t
L
a
y
o
u
t
Un
s
a
f
e
/
U
n
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
Si
t
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Lo
t
L
a
y
o
u
t
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
12
1. Street layout: poor provisions or unsafe conditions for pedestrians,
poor internal vehicular or pedestrian circulation
Poor provisions or unsafe conditions for pedestrians were observed throughout
the Study Area in the form of lack of sidewalks, cracked or uneven sidewalk
surfaces, and poor internal pedestrian circulation. The walking trails and
bridge in the center of the medical campus showed signs of erosion and were
in need of repair, as shown in Figure 3. Additionally, within the medical
campus there are walkways that ended abruptly and did not provide adequate
connectivity internally to the site as well as externally. Specifically, there are
no sidewalks along the west side of North Lutheran Parkway from the Rocky
Mountain Ditch to West 32nd Avenue, north side of West 32nd Avenue from
North Lutheran Parkway to Dudley Street, and various sections of West
Lutheran Parkway are missing sidewalks on either side of the street, including
next to the bus/shuttle stop near the intersection of North Lutheran Parkway.
Figure 3. Poor Provisions or Unsafe Conditions for Pedestrians
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
13
Poor internal vehicular access was also observed with streets abruptly ending.
This was observed for a paved street from the parking lot on the east side of
Study Area directly north of the Rocky Mountain Ditch that turns into a dirt
path and does not connect to the North Lutheran Parkway, shown below in
Figure 4. This also occurred on the west side of the Study Area where the
street to the helicopter pad abruptly ends instead of connecting to West 35th
Avenue, shown in Figure 4 on the bottom.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
14
Figure 4. Poor Internal Vehicular or Pedestrian Circulation
2. Lot layout: poor vehicular access
While the Study Area vehicular access may have sufficient connectivity north-
south, the Study Area has poor vehicular access regarding east-west street
needs. Connections to the established street grid are lacking, such as West
35th Avenue, shown below in Figure 5. There are two streets that connect to
West 38th Avenue, North Lutheran Parkway and West Lutheran Parkway, but
only one (North Lutheran Parkway) connects to West 32nd Avenue and travels
through the entirety of the Study Area. For an area of this size, it has
inadequate internal and external vehicle accessibility and limits development
potential.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
15
Figure 5. Poor Vehicular Access
3. Unsafe/unsanitary: cracked or uneven surfaces for pedestrians,
excessive litter, vandalism/graffiti, excessive litter, open ditches,
holes, or trenches in pedestrian areas
Throughout the Study Area several unsafe or unsanitary conditions were
observed. Cracked or uneven surfaces for pedestrians were present largely on
the walking paths between the medical buildings and in the southwest quadrant
of the Study Area, as shown in Figure 6. It should be noted the sidewalks
immediately near the hospital on the northern side of the Study Area were in
the best condition, while moving south and west the condition of sidewalks
decline. A utility box on the western side of the Study Area near Dudley Street
was significantly vandalized with graffiti, shown in Figure 7, as well as a
concerete barrier located between the parking lot and Rocky Mountain Ditch
on the eastearn side of the Study Area. A concentration of excessive litter was
found around the medical office building at the intersection of North Lutheran
Parkway and West 38th Avenue, shown in Figure 8. The Rocky Mountain Ditch
runs through the Study Area and has a pedestrain walkway adjacent to it
through most of area, as shown in Figure 9.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
16
Figure 6. Cracked or Uneven Surfaces for Pedestrians
Figure 7. Vandalism/Graffiti
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
17
Figure 8. Excessive Litter
Figure 9. Open Ditches/Trenches in Pedestrian Areas
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
18
4. Site improvements: neglected properties, deteriorated signage,
lighting, on-site parking surfaces, curb and gutter, or sidewalks, and
unpaved parking lot
Portions of the Study Area show signs of neglect, with the most significant
evidence in vacant sections. For example, there are large concrete tubes next
to an unmaintained baseball field, shown in Figure 10. Along with streetlamp
on the ground in the gravel parking lot in the southwest corner of the Study
Area and a do not enter sign on the ground in a parking lot (Figure 11).
Several parking surfaces, curbs, sidewalks, and pavement throughout the
Study Area showed signs of deterioration, illustrated in Figure 12.
Additionally, the parking lot in the southwest corner of the Study Area is
unpaved (Figure 13).
Figure 10. Neglected Properties or Evidence of Maintenance Deficiencies
Figure 11. Deteriorated Signage or Lighting
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
19
Figure 12. Deteriorated On-site Parking Surfaces, Curb and Gutter, or Sidewalks
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
20
Figure 13. Unpaved Parking Lot
5. Infrastructure: deteriorated pavement, curb, sidewalks, or lighting;
unusual topography
Various types of infrastructure showed signs of deterioration and in need of
maintenance including lighting, pavement, curbs, and sidewalks. In terms of
lighting, a light post was found with the wiring exposed in the main parking lot
along North Lutheran Parkway next to the hospital and, as previously
mentioned, a streetlamp was found on the ground next to the unpaved
parking lot (Figure 14). Throughout the medical campus several parking lots,
curbs, and sidewalks showed evidence of deterioration (Figure 15).
Additionally, the Study Area has an unusual topography with the Rocky
Mountain Ditch dividing the site and steep slopes along the eastern side of the
Study Area.
Figure 14. Deteriorated Lighting
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
21
Figure 15. Deteriorated Pavement, Curbs, and Sidewalks
6. Vacancy: vacant structures and an underdeveloped parcel in a
generally urbanized area
Lutheran Medical Campus is planning to vacate this location starting in 2024,
leaving the Study Area largely vacant. It is anticipated that when the hospital
moves many of the surrounding medical office building tenants will also
relocate, leaving the existing buildings vacant. Currently, the Study Area
includes approximately 58 acres of vacant land (Table 1), which includes
some parking lots. The entirety of the site is not being utilized to its highest
and best use. The surrounding area is developed with residential
neighborhoods (Figure 16) along with the Wheat Ridge Lutheran Church in
the northwest corner and cemetery south of West 32nd Avenue.
Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey
22
Figure 16. Underdeveloped in a Generally Urbanized Area
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
223132-Draft Report_Lutheran Legacy Campus Existing Conditions Survey 8-20-2025 23
3. Conclusions
Based on the definition of a blighted area in the Colorado Urban Renewal Law,
Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) § 31‐25‐101 et seq., and based on the field survey
results of the Study Area, EPS concludes that the Study Area is a blighted area as
defined in the Colorado Urban Renewal Law, Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) § 31‐
25‐101 et seq.
The visual field survey conducted in February 2023 documented 6 of the 11 factors of
blight within the Study Area. Therefore, this blighted area, as written in the Urban
Renewal Law, “substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the municipality,
retards the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or
social liability, and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare.”
Evidence of the following Urban Renewal Law blight factors are documented in this report:
(b) Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout.
(c) Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness.
(d) Unsanitary or unsafe conditions.
(e) Deterioration of site or other improvements.
(f) Unusual topography or inadequate public improvements or utilities.
(k.5) The existence of health, safety, or welfare factors requiring high levels of
municipal services or substantial physical underutilization or vacancy of sites,
buildings, or other improvements.
Evidence of the following Urban Renewal Law blight factors were not visually
observable, and based on the presence of other, more significant physical
conditions, these factors of blight did not warrant further investigation.
(a) Slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures.
(g) Defective or unusual conditions of title rendering the title nonmarketable.
(h) The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other
causes.
(I) Buildings that are unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work in
because of building code violations, dilapidation, deterioration, defective
design, physical construction, or faulty or inadequate facilities.
(j) Environmental contamination of buildings or property.
As established by Urban Renewal case law in Colorado, this assessment is based
on the condition of the Study Area as a whole. There is substantial evidence and
documentation of 6 of the 11 blight factors in the Study Area as a whole.
ITEM NUMBER: 3
DATE: September 22, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL BILL 18-2025
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE DISPOSITION OF PARK LAND
AT HANK STITES PARK AND IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
AUTHORIZING AN EXCHANGE OF LAND TO CORRECT THE
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
☒PUBLIC HEARING
☐BIDS/MOTIONS
☐RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☒ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
Hank Stites Park is located at the northwest corner of W. 29th Avenue and Newland
Street. There are discrepancies at the north and west sides of the park where
improvements do not align with the property boundary. In 2021, this was approved by
city council to be resolved by a land exchange with the adjacent property owner,
however that approval has lapsed. Approval of this ordinance will reauthorize that
approval and allow the land swap to be completed.
Because this exchange involves park land, Section 16.5 of the City Charter requires
unanimous approval by the entire council.
PRIOR ACTION:
This issue was first presented at a study session on June 1, 2020, at which time City
Council provided direction to move forward on the land exchange. On December 13,
2021, City Council approved an ordinance authorizing the land exchange. That approval
was valid for one year; however, the subdivision application associated with the
exchange was not completed within that time frame due to changes among the
ownership partners.
City Council approved this ordinance on first reading on September 8, 2025. A motion
was made by Councilmember Hoppe and seconded by Councilmember Dozeman and
was approved by a vote of 8 to 0.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no proposal to exchange funds in association with the land swap. The owner of
Council Action Form – Hank Stites Park Land Swap
September 22, 2025
Page 2
the adjacent property at 6675 W. 29th Avenue is pursuing subdivision of their property
and has borne the costs of the plat and the exhibits associated with the land exchange.
The city previously shared the cost of replacing and upgrading the fence on the west
side of the park between the two properties.
BACKGROUND:
Hank Stites Park is located at the northwest corner of W. 29th Avenue and Newland
Street. The park contains a playground, basketball court, and a youth-size baseball field.
The adjacent property at 6675 W. 29th Avenue is an oversized lot in the Residential-Two
(R-2) zone district. The private property has a flag configuration with the majority of the
land located west of the park and a 15-foot-wide pole portion extending east to Newland
Street.
The private property previously contained a single-family home which was demolished
in 2017. The partnership that purchased the property pursued a subdivision and worked
with the city’s Parks and Recreation Department to replace the chain link fence
separating the park and private property. The original partnership subsequently
dissolved before subdivision approval.
Proposed Land Swap
The current ownership group resumed a subdivision proposal in late 2024 and has
submitted subdivision and drainage designs for review. The subdivision proposes four
single-unit homes. While the subdivision can be approved with or without the land
exchange, the swap corrects two longstanding issues:
• At the north side of the park, the playground and basketball court extend over a
15-foot sliver of private property. It is unclear from historical records why the
park improvements cross onto private property. This portion, 3,671 square feet,
would be deeded to the city.
• At the west side of the park, the fence is located several feet off the property line
and into the park. The fence has been offset from the property line for many
years in order to avoid mature trees. This portion, 1,471 square feet, would be
deeded from the city to the adjacent owner.
The exchange results in a net increase of land to the park and corrects property
boundary discrepancies. The two parcels are shown in the attachments.
Approval Process
While the exchange results in a net gain of parkland, the transfer of the western 1,471-
square-foot portion from the park is considered a disposal of parkland under Section
16.5 of the Wheat Ridge Charter. This requires unanimous approval of the entire Council
by ordinance.
If Council approves the exchange, the property owner will finalize their subdivision plat
reflecting the new boundaries, and warranty deeds will be executed to finalize the
Council Action Form – Hank Stites Park Land Swap
September 8, 2025
Page 3
transaction. There is no proposal to exchange funds in association with the land
exchange.
RECOMMENDATION:
Subdivision and development of the adjacent private property can proceed with or
without the land exchange, however the exchange results in a favorable condition for
both the city and the property owner. For this reason, staff recommends approval of the
ordinance.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve Council Bill No. 18-2025, an ordinance approving the disposition of
park land at Hank Stites Park and in connection therewith authorizing an exchange of
land to correct the property boundary, on second reading, order it published, and that it
takes effect fifteen (15) days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the
charter.”
Or,
“I move to postpone indefinitely Council Bill No. 18-2025, an ordinance approving the
disposition of park land at Hank Stites Park and in connection therewith authorizing an
exchange of land to correct the property boundary, for the following reason(s)
_________________.”
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Lauren Mikulak, Community Development Director
Scott Cutler, Senior Planner
Patrick Goff, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Council Bill No. 18-2025
2. Exhibit A - Legal Descriptions
3. Exhibit B - Aerial Image
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HOPPE
Council Bill No. 18
Ordinance No. 1831
Series 2025
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE DISPOSITION OF PARK LAND
AT HANK STITES PARK AND IN CONNECTION THEREWITH AUTHORIZING
AN EXCHANGE OF LAND TO CORRECT THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado (“City”) owns certain real property
within the City at the northwest corner of West 29th Avenue and Newland Street that is
designated as park land and known as Hank Stites Park (the “Park Property”); and
WHEREAS, a playground and basketball court were constructed at the north end
of the Park Property over a 15-foot-wide parcel of private property; and
WHEREAS, the fence along the western boundary of the Park Property is not
aligned with the parcel line because of the presence of mature trees; and
WHEREAS, the City and the adjacent property owner, James S Muniz, desire to
correct these property line discrepancies; and
WHEREAS, the portion of Park Property which the City proposes to convey to
James S Muniz is designated park land; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Wheat Ridge City Charter Section 16.5, the unanimous
approval of the entire City Council, by ordinance, is necessary to sell or dispose of
designated park land; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the disposition of a portion
of Hank Stites Park does not impact the use or needs of the adjacent park; and
WHEREAS, the City Council therefore desires to approve the disposition of the Park
Property conditioned upon the receipt of the parcel along the north boundary of the park
and the consolidation of the same with the Park Property.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT
RIDGE, COLORADO:
Section 1. Conveyance of Park Property approved. Pursuant to Charter Section
16.5, the City Council hereby approves the conveyance to James S Muniz of certain City-
ATTACHMENT 1
owned property designated as park land, which land is more particularly described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. Conveyance Documents. In connection with the conveyance of park
land approved by Section 1 above, the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute the associated deeds and plat (once approved), in a form
approved by the City Attorney.
Section 3. Conditions of Approval. The conveyance of property and execution of
associated documents approved by Sections 1 and 2 above is expressly contingent upon
the satisfaction of all of the following conditions precedent: (1) James S Muniz conveys
to the City the parcel north of the park, which land is more particularly described in Exhibit
B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and (2) James S Muniz
completes final approval of a plat which consolidates the Park Property. Should any one
of these conditions precedent fail to occur on or before September 22, 2026, the
approvals set forth in Sections 1 and 2 above shall never become effective.
Section 3. Severability, Conflicting Ordinances Repealed. If any section,
subsection or clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or
otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall
not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the
provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days
after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter.
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 8th
day of September, 2025, ordered published by title in the newspaper and in full on the
City’s website as provided by the Home Rule Charter, and Public Hearing and
consideration on final passage set for September 22, 2025, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council
Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a
vote of ___ to ___, this 22nd day of September 2025.
SIGNED by the Mayor on this _____ day of ____________, 2025
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Senior Deputy City Clerk
Bud Starker, Mayor
ATTACHMENT 1
Approved as to Form:
Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney
First Publication: September 9, 2025
Second Publication: September 23, 2025
Effective Date: October 8, 2025
Published:
Jeffco Transcript and www.ci.wheatridge.co.us
EXHIBIT A
PARCEL DESCRIPTION
NORTH SOUTH PARK
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN LOTS 1 THROUGH 3 OF HENDERSON’S SUBDIVISION AMENDED
PLAT, IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, OF THE
6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE NORTH LINE OF SAID HENDERSON’S SUBDIVISION AMENDED PLAT,
BEING MONUMENTED TO THE NORTHEAST BY A 3” BRASS CAP STAMPED "DMWW" AND TO THE
NORTHWEST BY A 1” REBAR, ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 89°41'31" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 375.10
FEET.
COMMENCING AT THE SAID 3” BRASS CAP TO THE NORTH EAST, THENCE SOUTH 89°41’31" WEST
ON SAID NORTH LINE OF HENDERSON’S SUBDIVISION AMENDED PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 245.29 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 00°03'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 15.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE SOUTH 00°03'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 53.03 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 01°13'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 148.13 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 00°08'46" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 102.53 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 89°40'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2.47 FEET TO A POINT THAT LIES NORTH 00°18'52"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1.50 FEET FROM A 3” BRASS CAP STAMPED “DMWW”,
THENCE NORTH 00°18'52" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 303.62 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 89°40'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 7.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 1,471 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS.
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:
I, AARON A. DEMO, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO,
DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED UNDER MY PERSONAL
SUPERVISION AND CHECKING, AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, BELIEF AND IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION.
AARON A. DEMO, PLS
COLORADO LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 38285
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF BASELINE CORPORATION
BASELINE ENGINEERING CORP.
4007 S. LINCOLN AVE. SUITE 405,
LOVELAND, CO, 80537
(970) 353-7600
ATTACHMENT 2
PAGE 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
PARCEL DESCRIPTION
EAST WEST PARK
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN LOT 4 OF HENDERSON’S SUBDIVISION AMENDED PLAT, IN THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, OF THE 6TH
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE NORTH LINE OF SAID HENDERSON’S SUBDIVISION AMENDED PLAT,
BEING MONUMENTED TO THE NORTHEAST BY A 3” BRASS CAP STAMPED "DMWW" AND TO THE
NORTHWEST BY A 1” REBAR, ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 89°41'31" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 375.10
FEET.
COMMENCING AT THE SAID 3” BRASS CAP TO THE NORTH EAST, THENCE SOUTH 89°41'31" WEST
ON SAID NORTH LINE OF HENDERSON’S SUBDIVISION AMENDED PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 1.50 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE SOUTH 00°18'52" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 89°40'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 243.89 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 00°03'34" EAST TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID HENDERSON’S SUBDIVISION
AMENDED PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 15.11 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 89°41'31" EAST, ON THE NORTH LINE OF HENDERSON’S SUBDIVISION AMENDED
PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 243.79 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 3,671 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS.
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:
I, AARON A. DEMO, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO,
DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED UNDER MY PERSONAL
SUPERVISION AND CHECKING, AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, BELIEF AND IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION.
AARON A. DEMO, PLS
COLORADO LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 38285
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF BASELINE CORPORATION
BASELINE ENGINEERING CORP.
4007 S. LINCOLN AVE. SUITE 405,
LOVELAND, CO, 80537
(970) 353-7600
EXHIBIT B
The first image shows in blue the current property lines of Stites Park and the adjacent private property at 6675 W.
29th Avenue; it also shows that park improvements encroach into private property.
This second image highlights the parcels which are proposed to be exchanged. The east-west parcel shaded green
is currently under private ownership and would become part of Stites Park. The north-south parcel shaded in
orange is currently under City ownership but located on the west side of the fence line and would be conveyed to
the owner of 6675 W.29th Avenue. The net increase in parkland would be just over 2,000 sf.
ATTACHMENT 3
ITEM NUMBER: 4
DATE: September 22, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL BILL 19-2025
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 10285 RIDGE ROAD FROM AGRICULTURAL-ONE
(A-1) TO MIXED USE COMMERCIAL – TRANSIT ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT (MUC-TOD)
☐PUBLIC HEARING
☐BIDS/MOTIONS
☐RESOLUTIONS
☒ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☒YES ☐NO
ISSUE:
The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Mixed
Use Commercial – Transit Oriented Development (MUC-TOD) for property at 10285 Ridge
Road for a mixed-use affordable housing project.
PRIOR ACTION:
None
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Fees in the amount of $3,778 were collected for the review and processing of the zone
change and concept plan. Site plan application fees will be due at time of individual site
plan applications. Building permit and plan review fees will be paid as part of the
issuance of building permits. Parkland dedication fees are waived for affordable
housing projects.
BACKGROUND:
The site is located on the north side of Ridge Road, west of Miller Street, and south of
West 54th Avenue. The site is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, CDHS Summit Village
Subdivision Filing No. 1 and is approximately 474,405 square feet (10.891 acres) in size.
It currently contains several unoccupied buildings from when it functioned as part of a
much larger 68-acre, group home campus for people with intellectual and
developmental disabilities, originally owned and operated by the Colorado Department
of Human Services in the 1980’s. The remaining buildings on the site are currently
undergoing remediation through the state and will eventually be demolished.
Council Action Form – Rezoning Property at 10285 Ridge Rd.
September 22, 2025
Page 2
The property is surrounded by a wide range of land uses and zoning designations with
lower-density residential to the north and west, transit-supportive residential to the
south, and commercial/institutional to the east. The site is currently zoned Agricultural-
One (A-1) and is well-situated to serve as a transition between surrounding properties.
Adjacent properties to the north are zoned Planned Unit Development (in Arvada); to the
west are properties zoned Planned Residential Development (in Wheat Ridge); to the
south is Planned Industrial Development (in Wheat Ridge) zoning, including the Rocky
Mountain Bottling plant; and to the east is the Wheat Ridge Regional Center (WRRC),
which is operated by the Colorado Department of Human Services and provides a
collection of group homes that serve adult individuals with intellectual and
developmental disabilities who need additional support. The redevelopment site
surrounds the WRRC site on three sides. The WRRC site will remain under state
ownership and zoned A-1 and is not a part of this application. Further to the northeast is
the Arvada Red Rocks Community College (RRCC) campus which is zoned Mixed Use
Transit (Arvada).
The current A-1 zoning allows for government facilities or one (1) single-unit home and
accessory structures, with up to 25-percent building coverage and 35-foot height. The
State of Colorado recently sold the property to the Jefferson County Housing Authority
dba Foothills Regional Housing (FRH) under the condition that it be developed primarily
as an affordable housing site with secondary community services. FRH’s intent is to
redevelop the site as a mixed-use property with a range of affordable housing types as
well as educational (expansion of RRCC), office, and community-supporting commercial
uses.
The site is located within one-quarter mile of the Arvada Station and within one mile of
the Wheat Ridge · Ward Station. It falls within the Transit Village place type within the
City Plan. Transit Village is defined as a compact, walkable district centered around a
rail station that supports higher-density residential development and convenient access
to neighborhood-serving commercial amenities. The Transit Village is intended to
promote transit use, reduce dependence on personal vehicles, and foster a vibrant,
mixed-use environment where daily needs can be met within walking distance. MUC-
TOD zoning is appropriate because of the designation in City Plan, the proximity to the
commuter rail station, and the variety of land uses in the area.
The proposed MUC-TOD zoning allows for a wide range of residential and commercial
uses, such as the RRCC expansion. Because the site is over 10 acres, a concept plan is
also required. A concept plan application is concurrently under review by staff, along
with plans for the RRCC building on the northeast corner for expansion of their nursing
program, a supportive services building (such as a community health center) on the
southeast corner, and a variety of affordable housing on the west side of the site. An
office/maintenance building for the housing units and grounds is planned internal to the
site.
Council Action Form – Rezoning Property at 10285 Ridge Rd. from A-1 to MUC-TOD
September 22, 2025
Page 3
A complete analysis of the zone change criteria, along with the draft Concept Plan, will
be included with the ordinance for second reading.
RECOMMENDATION:
The application in this case is for the rezoning of property. This action is quasi-judicial,
and as a result, the applicant is entitled to a public hearing on the application.
As Council is aware, rezoning in Wheat Ridge is accomplished by ordinance (Charter
Sec. 5.10; Code Section 26-112). Ordinances require two readings, and by Charter, the
public hearing takes place on second reading.
First reading in these cases is a procedural action that merely sets the date for the
(second reading) public hearing. No testimony is taken on first reading. Because it is
important that the applicant and all interested parties have their due process rights to a
hearing, the City Attorney advises Council to approve rezoning ordinances on first
reading. This merely sets the date for the public hearing, and for this reason, the packet
materials provided on first reading are generally limited. The Planning Commission
packet and draft minutes will be included in the City Council packet for the public
hearing.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve Council Bill No. 19-2025, an ordinance approving the rezoning of
property located at 10285 Ridge Road from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Mixed Use
Commercial – Transit Oriented Development (MUC-TOD) on first reading for the
purpose of ordering it published for a public hearing set for Monday, October 27, 2025
at 6:30 p.m. in City Council Chambers, and, if adopted, that it take effect 15 days after
final publication.”
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Stephanie Stevens, Senior Planner
Jana Easley, Planning Manager
Lauren Mikulak, Community Development Director
Patrick Goff, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Council Bill No. 19-2025
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER
Council Bill No. 19-2025
Ordinance No. 1832
Series 2025
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10285 RIDGE ROAD FROM
AGRICULTURAL-ONE (A-1) TO MIXED USE COMMERCIAL –
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (MUC-TOD) (CASE NO.
WZ-25-02)
WHEREAS, Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws establishes procedures
for the City’s review and approval of requests for land use cases; and
WHEREAS, Jefferson County Housing Authority dba Foothills Regional Housing
submitted a land use application for approval of a zone change to the Mixed Use
Commercial – Transit Oriented Development (MUC-TOD) for property at 10285 Ridge
Road; and
WHEREAS, Foothills Regional Housing intends to redevelop the site as a mixed-
use property with a range of affordable housing types, educational (expansion of Red
Rocks Community College), office, and community-supporting commercial uses.; and
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a Comprehensive Plan, City Plan,
which promotes inclusiveness, serving a mix of incomes, and offering a diverse variety
of housing options; and
WHEREAS, the City Plan recognizes the site as Transit Village, which is defined as
a compact, walkable district centered around a rail station that supports higher density
residential development and convenient access to neighborhood serving commercial
amenities; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is necessary and appropriate to accommodate
affordable housing and supportive services near transit stations; and
WHEREAS, the zone change criteria support the request; and
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission will hold a public hearing
on October 16, 2025 to consider the rezoning of the property to Mixed Use Commercial –
Transit Oriented Development (MUC-TOD).
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT
RIDGE, COLORADO:
ATTACHMENT 1
Section 1. Upon application by Foothills Regional Housing for approval of a zone
change ordinance from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Mixed Use Commercial – Transit
Oriented Development (MUC-TOD) for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, and
pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public
hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change is approved for the following
described land:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CDHS SUMMIT VILLAGE SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 1, CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change does not
create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant
to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge.
Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines,
and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the
City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public
and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the
protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that
the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be
attained.
Section 4. Severability, Conflicting Ordinances Repealed. If any section,
subsection, or clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or
otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall
not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the
provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days
after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter.
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of ___ to ___ on this
22nd day of September 2025, ordered published by title in the newspaper and in full on
the City’s website as provided by the Home Rule Charter, and Public Hearing and
consideration on final passage set for October 27, 2025, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council
Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a
vote of ___ to ___, this 27th day of October 2025.
ATTACHMENT 1
SIGNED by the Mayor on this _______ day of ____________________, 2025.
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Senior Deputy City Clerk
Bud Starker, Mayor
Approved as to Form:
Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney
First Publication: September 23, 2025
Second Publication: October 28, 2025
Effective Date: November 12, 2025
Published:
Jeffco Transcript and www.ci.wheatridge.co.us
ITEM NUMBER: 5
DATE: September 22, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
RESOLUTION 47-2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT CONCERNING REGIONAL COLD WEATHER
RESPONSE FOR THOSE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS
☐PUBLIC HEARING
☐BIDS/MOTIONS
☒RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
The County of Jefferson and the cities of Arvada, Edgewater, Golden, Lakewood,
Westminster, and Wheat Ridge are proposing an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) to
establish a collaborative, regional approach to addressing cold weather response for
those experiencing homelessness in Jefferson County for the 2025-2026 cold weather
season and potentially beyond. This initiative aims to address the increasing number of
individuals experiencing homelessness in Jefferson County, which is recognized as a
regional issue affecting the health, safety, and welfare of each community.
PRIOR ACTION:
The Parties to the proposed IGA previously participated in the 2025 Jefferson County
Spring Forum on Homelessness. This forum served as a platform to discuss and plan
for a regional homelessness response, focusing on building regional approaches,
reviewing local actions, identifying common challenges and successes, and aligning
potential collaborative solutions. A key outcome of the Forum was the agreement on a
countywide cold weather response strategy for the 2025-2026 cold weather season.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The total estimated sheltering costs
for the 2025-2026 Cold Weather
Season is $2,059,000. This estimate
is based on the actual expense to
fund the following regional sheltering,
staffing and operational support
options during the 2024-2025 season.
Lakewood Navigation Center $500,000
Jeffco Family Shelter $300,000
The Mac in Westminster $69,000
Arvada non-profit shelter $100,000
Motel vouchers $940,000
Staffing support $150,000
Total $2,059,000
Council Action Form – IGA Cold Weather Response
September 22, 2025
Page 2
Jefferson County will serve as the Fiscal Agent. Cities will pay their pro rata costs
directly to Jefferson County, with 25% due on November 1, 2025, and the remaining 75%
due on or by January 15, 2026.
Wheat Ridge’s pro rata share based on population is $102,950, of which $25,737 is due
on November 1, 2025, and the remaining $77,213 is due on January 15, 2026.
BACKGROUND:
The IGA aims to coordinate a regional cold weather response for those experiencing
homelessness in Jefferson County, recognizing this as a regional issue impacting the
health, safety, and welfare of all communities. The Parties agree to work collaboratively
to coordinate a regional approach for cold weather response and to abide by the terms
set forth in Exhibit A (the Term Sheet). The IGA may be renewed annually for up to five
(5) consecutive one-year terms, with automatic renewals unless terminated.
The cold weather service period is defined as October 1, 2025 – April 30, 2026, with
provisions for severe weather events after April 30. Jefferson County will activate the
regional response based on 72-hour forecasts from the National Weather Service,
utilizing specific temperature/precipitation thresholds. These thresholds include a
Health Alert Notification for extreme weather (10°F regardless of wind or
precipitation) and a Health Advisory Notification for severe weather (32°F or lower with
accumulation of precipitation greater than one inch, or 20°F or lower with or without
precipitation). A dedicated Cold Weather Activation (CWA) Team, comprising
representatives from Jefferson County Public Health, Human Services, and Emergency
Management, will convene to prepare for activations.
Coordinated outreach, involving homeless/housing navigators, non-profit partners, and
police departments, will provide information and connect unsheltered individuals to
available shelter during CWAs. During CWAs, Parties agree to transport people to/from
shelter to the extent possible, utilizing RTD passes, and a Lyft Concierge account
managed by Jefferson County. Transportation is not guaranteed due to severe weather
conditions. Motel vouchers will be issued to eligible families and singles based on
vulnerability and conditions limiting access to congregate shelter.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the Council:
1. Approve and authorize the execution of the Intergovernmental Agreement Concerning
Regional Cold Weather Response for those Experiencing Homelessness.
2. Commit to the financial obligations and cost-sharing arrangements outlined in the
IGA and its Term Sheet (Exhibit A), including making pro rata payments to Jefferson
County as the Fiscal Agent.
Council Action Form – IGA Cold Weather Response
September 22, 2025
Page 3
3. Support collaborative efforts for cold weather response, including participation in
outreach, transportation, and reporting as defined in the IGA.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve Resolution 47-2025, a resolution approving an Intergovernmental
Agreement concerning regional cold weather response for those experiencing
homelessness.”
Or,
“I move to postpone indefinitely Resolution 47-2025, a resolution approving an
Intergovernmental Agreement concerning regional cold weather response for those
experiencing homelessness for the following reason(s).”
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Patrick Goff, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 47-2025
2. Intergovernmental Agreement
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 47
SERIES OF 2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT CONCERNING REGIONAL COLD WEATHER RESPONSE FOR
THOSE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge, along with Jefferson County and the cities of
Arvada, Edgewater, Golden, Lakewood, and Westminster, recognizes that homelessness
is a regional issue impacting the health, safety, and welfare of all communities within
Jefferson County; and
WHEREAS, the Parties participated in the 2025 Jefferson County Spring Forum on
Homelessness, which identified the need for a collaborative, countywide cold weather
response strategy for the 2025-2026 cold weather season and potentially beyond; and
WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) establishes a coordinated,
regional cold weather response program to provide shelter, transportation, and outreach
services for individuals and families experiencing homelessness during periods of
extreme weather; and
WHEREAS, Jefferson County will serve as Fiscal Agent for the program, with the
total cost of $2,059,000 to be shared among the participating jurisdictions on a pro rata
basis; and
WHEREAS, Wheat Ridge’s share of the cost is $102,950 payable in two
installments of $25,737 due on November 1, 2025, and $77,213 due on January 15, 2026;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the participation in this IGA
is in the best interests of the City and its residents and will further the City’s goals of
regional collaboration and public safety.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge,
Colorado:
1. The Intergovernmental Agreement Concerning Regional Cold Weather
Response for those Experiencing Homelessness, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved.
2. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the IGA and any
necessary supporting documents.
3. The City of Wheat Ridge commits to its financial obligations as outlined in the
IGA and Exhibit A, including the payment of $102,950 to Jefferson County in
accordance with the prescribed schedule.
4. The City of Wheat Ridge affirms its commitment to collaborate with Jefferson
County and partner municipalities in the implementation of the cold weather
response, including participation in outreach, transportation, and reporting.
DONE AND RESOLVED this 22nd day of September 2025
[SEAL] Bud Starker, Mayor
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
1
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT CONCERNING REGIONAL COLD
WEATHER RESPONSE FOR THOSE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS
1.0 PARTIES. This Intergovernmental Agreement (“IGA”), effective as of October 1, 2025
(“Effective Date”), is entered into by the following Parties (each, individually, a “Party”):
1.1. The County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, a body politic and corporate (the
“County”)
1.2. The City of Arvada, a municipal corporation (“Arvada”)
1.3. The City of Edgewater, a municipal corporation (“Edgewater”)
1.4. The City of Golden, a municipal corporation (“Golden”)
1.5. The City of Lakewood, a municipal corporation (“Lakewood”)
1.6. The City of Westminster, a municipal corporation (“Westminster”); and
1.7. The City of Wheat Ridge, a municipal corporation (“Wheat Ridge”).
2.0 RECITALS
2.1. The Parties are authorized by the provisions of Colo. Const. Art. XIV, §18(2)(a) and
C.R.S. §§29-1-201, et. seq. to contract with one another to provide any function,
service, or facility lawfully authorized to each.
2.2. The increasing number of individuals experiencing homelessness in Jefferson County
continues to be a regional issue that affects the health, safety, and welfare of each of
the Parties’ communities.
2.3. The Parties participated in the 2025 Spring Forum on Homelessness to address and plan
for a regional homelessness response. The Forum centered on building regional
approaches, reviewing local actions, identifying common challenges and successes and
aligning potential collaborative solutions, with a specific focus on collaborating on a
regional cold weather response for the 2025-2026 cold weather season.
2.4. The Parties agree it would be in the best interest of all Parties to coordinate a regional
cold weather response for those experiencing homelessness in Jefferson County.
2.5. The Parties desire to establish this IGA to commit to a collaborative, regional approach
to addressing cold weather response for those experiencing homelessness in Jefferson
County.
ATTACHMENT 2
2
2.6. Establishment of this IGA will serve a public purpose and will promote the health,
safety, and general welfare of inhabitants in and around Jefferson County.
3.0 EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM
3.1. This IGA will take effect on October 1, 2025, and remain in effect through September
30, 2026, subject to the Parties’ right to terminate under this IGA.
3.2. This IGA may be renewed by the Parties annually for no more than five (5) consecutive
one-year renewal terms Renewals shall be automatic unless the Agreement is
terminated by any Party pursuant to Section 7.1 of this IGA. Each year 60 days prior
to commencement of any renewal term, the Parties shall agree upon any changes to the
Term Sheet contained in Exhibit A or confirm that Exhibit A remains unchanged. Any
agreed-upon changes to Exhibit A shall be deemed an amendment to this IGA.
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES. The Parties agree to work collaboratively to
coordinate a regional approach for a cold weather response for those experiencing homelessness
among Jefferson County jurisdictions.
5.0 TERM SHEET. The Parties agree to abide by the terms set forth in the Term Sheet
attached hereto as Exhibit A to carry out the intention of the Parties to strategically address the
regional response to 2025-2026 cold weather season for those experiencing homelessness in
Jefferson County.
6.0 AMENDMENTS
6.1. This IGA may be amended at any time by written agreement signed by the signing
authorities of the Parties to this IGA.
7.0 TERMINATION OF IGA
7.1. INDIVIDUAL PARTY TERMINATION. Any Party may terminate its participation
in this IGA by providing 60 days written notice to the other Parties. In the event of
such termination, the remaining Parties agree to meet and decide how to proceed
without the terminating Party. Upon notice of such termination, the Parties may
continue this IGA without the terminating Party or decide to terminate the IGA. The
terminating Party shall pay their portion of the pro rata pooled funding obligation as of
the effective date of the Party’s termination. Pro rata for this purpose shall be calculated
3
based on the percentage of the cold weather season that has elapsed as of the effective
date of termination.
8.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS
8.1. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this IGA or the application thereof to any Party
is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the
IGA which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this
end, the provisions of the IGA are declared to be severable.
8.2. ASSIGNMENT. Except as otherwise stated herein, this IGA shall not be assigned by
any Party.
8.3. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Except as otherwise stated herein, this
IGA is intended to describe the rights and responsibilities of and between the Parties
and is not intended to, and shall not be deemed to, confer rights upon any persons or
entities not named as Parties. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to create a
partnership or joint venture between the Parties.
8.4. BINDING EFFECT. This IGA shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the
Parties, their respective legal representatives, successors, heirs, and assigns; provided,
however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to permit the assignment of
this IGA except as otherwise expressly authorized herein.
8.5. NOTICES. Any notice or notification required or permitted by the IGA shall be in
writing and shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given for all purposes if sent by
certified mail or registered mail, postage and fees prepaid, addressed to the party to
whom such notice is to be given at the address as has been previously furnished in
writing, to the other party or parties. Such notice or notification shall be deemed to
have been given when deposited in the United States mail.
8.6. TABOR COMPLIANCE; NO GENERAL OBLIGATION INDEBTEDNESS.
Because this IGA may extend beyond the current fiscal year, all of the Parties
understand and intend that the obligation of the Parties for committing monetary
funding hereunder constitutes a current expense of the Parties payable exclusively from
the Parties’ funds and appropriated each fiscal year and shall not in any way be
construed to be a multi-fiscal year debt or other financial obligation within the meaning
of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, a general obligation indebtedness
4
of the Parties within the meaning of any provision of Article XI of the Colorado
Constitution, or any other constitutional or statutory indebtedness.
8.7. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. This IGA shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Colorado. Venue for any action arising under this IGA will be in the
appropriate court for Jefferson County, Colorado.
8.8. BINDING AUTHORITY. The Parties represent and affirm that the signature page
hereof accurately states the full legal name of the entity, contains all requisite
signature(s) on behalf of the Party, has been properly acknowledged by attestation,
notary acknowledgment, or both.
8.9. COUNTERPARTS. This IGA may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed to be an original and all such counterparts taken together
shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. The Parties acknowledge
and agree that the original of this IGA, including the signature page, may be scanned
and stored in a computer database or similar device, and that any printout or other
output readable by sight, the reproduction of which is shown to accurately reproduce
the original of this IGA, may be used for any purpose as if it were the original, including
proof of the content of the original writing.
8.10. GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY. No portion of this IGA shall be deemed to
constitute a waiver of any immunity, the Parties, or their officers or employees may
possess, nor shall any portion of this IGA be deemed to have created a duty of care
which did not previously exist with respect to any person not a party to this IGA.
[SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW]
5
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON,
STATE OF COLORADO
By:
Joseph M. Kerby, County Manager
jmkerby@jeffco.us
ATTEST:
_________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: _____________________
Carey Taylor Markel, Deputy County Attorney
cmarkel@jeffco.us
6
CITY OF ARVADA, a Colorado home rule
municipal corporation
By: ________________________________
Don Wick, City Manager
dwick@arvada.org
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________________
Kylie Justus, Senior Assistant City Attorney
kjustus@arvada.org
7
CITY OF GOLDEN, a Colorado municipal
corporation
By: ________________________________
Scott Vargo, City Manager
svargo@cityofgolden.net
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________________
Sandra Llanes, City Attorney
sllanes@cityofgolden.net
8
CITY OF LAKEWOOD, a Colorado municipal
corporation
By: ________________________________
Kathleen E. Hodgson, City Manager
kathod@lakewood.org
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________________
Lauren Stanek, Senior Assistant City Attorney
lausta@lakewoodco.org
9
CITY OF WESTMINSTER, a Colorado municipal
corporation
By: ________________________________
Jody Andrews, City Manager
jandrews@westminsterco.gov
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________________
Matthew Munch, City Attorney
mmunch@westminsterco.gov
10
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, a Colorado municipal
corporation
By: ________________________________
Patrick Goff, City Manager
pgoff@ci.wheatridge.co.us
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________________
Gerald Dahl, City Attorney
gdahl@mdkrlaw.com
11
CITY OF EDGEWATER, a Colorado municipal corporation
By: ________________________________
Dan Maples, City Manager
dmaples@edgewater.com
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________________
Carmen Beery, City Attorney
cbeery@mdkrlaw.com
12
Exhibit A
IGA 2025-2026 COLD WEATHER TERM SHEET
Term of Agreement: October 1, 2025-September 30, 2026
Service Period: October 1, 2025 – April 30, 2026
• If a severe weather event occurs after April 30 and sheltering is deemed necessary, the
Parties agree these Terms continue to apply.
Sheltering Options
The Parties agree to share the costs associated with severe weather sheltering for the 2025-2026
cold weather season, with the following sheltering, staffing, and operational support options:
o Lakewood Navigation Center ($500,000) This is a cap due to reasonable and standard
expectations based on past years’ operations.
Serving as 24/7 transitional shelter for up to 103 referred and enrolled guests
with the understanding the facility does not provide walk-up or drop-off shelter
access during cold weather periods.
o Jeffco Family Shelter ($300,000)
Serving as 24/7 emergency shelter for families with at least one dependent age 18
or under
o Motel vouchers ($900,000)
Provision of up to 200 motel vouchers nightly to provide sheltering on nights of
severe/extreme cold weather
Activated during severe weather at 32°F or lower with accumulation of
precipitation (snow) greater than one inch or with discretion in conditions of
concurrent non-accumulating wet precipitation such as rainfall or sleet, or 20°F
or lower with or without precipitation. Consideration will be given to wind when
determining activation.
o Staffing/Operational support for county motel vouchering ($150,000)
Needs related to oversight, administration and distribution of motel vouchers
issued by Jefferson County
o The Mac in Westminster ($69,000)
Activated when temperatures are anticipated to be 0°F or sustained wind chill
temperatures below 0°F for a minimum duration of six hours as determined
based on the City of Westminster’s Emergency Shelter Plan managed/operated
by the Westminster Fire Department for extreme cold weather events.
13
o Westminster motel vouchers ($40,000)
Activated during severe cold weather at 32°F or lower with a forecast 25% or
more chance of precipitation or 20°F or lower with or without precipitation if
guests cannot go to a congregant shelter. More rooms are made available when
forecast temperatures fall to 10°F or lower.
o Arvada non-profit ($100,000)
Operational expenses related to severe weather sheltering for up to 45 individuals
Activated during severe weather at 32°F or lower with accumulation of
precipitation (snow) greater than one inch or 20°F or lower with or without
precipitation
Total Sheltering Costs for 2025-2026 Cold Weather Season
The Parties agree that the total sheltering costs for the 2025-2026 Cold Weather Season to be
shared on pro rata basis based on population is $2,059,000. Each party’s pro-rata share is set forth
in the chart below:
Cost Sharing
Lakewood, Westminster, Arvada, and Jefferson County each pay their Direct Payment Offsets,
noted in the table above, in alignment with established fiscal processes which are costs those
entities contribute towards sheltering operations. These costs would be deducted from the pro rata
assessed amount each contribute to the pooled funding. If city-funded sheltering costs are not
committed by January 1, 2026, that city’s allotted amount will be added to the pooled funding.
Wheat Ridge, Edgewater, and Golden each pay their pro rata costs directly into pooled funding.
All pro rata payments will be used to fund Jeffco Family Shelter and motel vouchers issued by the
County.
14
County as Fiscal Agent
Jefferson County will serve as the Fiscal Agent with respect to the pooled funding and will
establish tracking and reporting processes. The cities will pay their pro rata costs directly to
Jefferson County with 25% due on November 1, 2025 and the remaining 75% paid on or by
January 15, 2026 as noted in the table above. Lakewood, Westminster, and Arvada will submit
monthly reports to the Fiscal Agent outlining agreed upon measures and expenditures for city-led
sheltering options. Monthly tracking reports will be provided during monthly City/County
Manager meetings. The County as Fiscal Agent will provide the cities with an end of season report
in advance of 2027 budget decisions. All expenditures need to be submitted to the Fiscal Agent by
June 15, 2026 with the goal of providing a final report by July 1, 2026. These dates do not reflect
unforeseen circumstances that may extend the need for severe weather response and with due
diligence to achieve final reconciliation in a timely manner. Any expenditures incurred during an
event subsequent to April 30, 2026 must be submitted within 30 days of the severe/extreme
weather event.
Fiscal Reconciliation Decision-Making
Each Party has identified a representative to carry out the continued implementation of this work
and to represent their respective localities in the preparation for the upcoming cold weather
season. The following individuals are the appointed decision makers to carry forward this work:
• Don Wick, City Manager, Arvada
• Dan Maples, City Manager, Edgewater
• Scott Vargo, City Manager, Golden
• Joseph Kerby, County Manager, Jefferson County
• Kathleen Hodgson, City Manager, Lakewood
• Jody Andrews, City Manager, Westminster
• Patrick Goff, City Manager, Wheat Ridge
• Kerry Wrenick, Regional Homelessness Coordinator, Jefferson County (non-voting)
With monthly reporting/tracking of expenses and the end of season report, any increases to
projected costs will be evaluated on an ongoing and end of season basis during the monthly
City/County Manager meetings. During the monthly meetings, the cities and the County will
discuss topics such as additional funding, amending services provided, or appropriate responses.
15
At the end of the season if a credit balance exists, the City/County Managers will determine
whether to refund any excess or carry it over to the 2026-2027 cold weather season.
Cold Weather Activation
Jefferson County will activate cold weather response utilizing the following
temperature/precipitation thresholds when notified by Jefferson County Public Health of a cold
weather health alert or advisory. The thresholds will be 72-hour forecasts of overnight low
temperatures of:
• Health Alert Notification: (extreme weather) 10°F regardless of wind or
precipitation
• Health Advisory Notification: (severe weather) 32°F or lower with
accumulation of anticipated precipitation (snow) greater than one inch over a 24-hour
period or with discretion in conditions of concurrent non-accumulating wet
precipitation such as rainfall or sleet, or 20°F or lower with or without precipitation.
Consideration will be given to wind when issuing a Health Advisory.
The Parties agree that discretion to enter a Cold Weather Activation (CWA) is the responsibility
of the Cold Weather Activation team, based on forecasts from the National Weather Service.
Representatives from Jefferson County Public Health, Jefferson County Human Services,
Jefferson County Emergency Management (CWA Team), will convene 72 hours in advance of
impending weather to prepare for an activation based on forecast. If a forecast indicates weather
conditions extending throughout a week, discretion will be used to make activation decisions by
10 a.m. on the third, fifth, and seventh day of the activation, with relevant updates communicated
to the public. Any reason for non-activation or suspension will be documented by the non-
activation or suspending party and provided to the other Parties. As individuals with ties to the
Cities of Arvada and Westminster may physically be located within these respective jurisdictions
but outside of Jefferson County, they may be considered eligible to utilize JeffCo Family Shelter
for families with children and Jefferson County hotel program for people unable to stay at
congregate shelters as part of this agreement.
The parameters for activation of Westminster’s The MAC is determined based on the City of
Westminster’s Emergency Shelter Plan managed/operated by the Westminster Fire Department
16
for extreme cold weather events. The activation of The MAC remains solely within the purview
and under the City of Westminster’ Emergency Shelter Plan, which is an annex of the City’s
Emergency Operations Plan. Activation of the extreme cold weather shelter will take into
consideration the Jefferson County CWA and notify them when The MAC activates. Westminster
cold weather hotel stays are available during The MAC activating as an extreme weather shelter.
They are also available when Adams County Severe Weather Activation Program starts providing
additional cold weather hotel rooms when it is forecast to be 10°F or below.
Communication of CWA
To the extent possible, seventy-two hours prior to declaration of a CWA, Jefferson County will
notify the Board of County Commissioners, City Managers, partner municipal and county
homelessness response teams, that a CWA will be declared. Broader public facing notification will
occur no later than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the CWA and may be communicated through
push notifications on the County website, the Heading Home website, social media, email
networks, or other formats by Jefferson County Communications. No public-facing notifications,
including email or social media, shall be shared prior to the official public notification from
Jefferson County Public Affairs Team. Extensions of an ongoing CWA will similarly and officially
be posted to the public through Jefferson County Communications. Municipalities will maintain
responsibility for activation notifications and public awareness sent through their Communications
teams.
If severe weather is expected over a weekend or on a Monday holiday, more advanced public
notice than 24-hours will be issued when possible.
Outreach
Outreach strategies refer to coordinating direct engagement with people in unsheltered
homelessness to equip them with information to make a plan to access available shelter. Outreach
will be coordinated upon declaration of a CWA, from the seventy-two (72)hour lead period and
through sheltering operations. Two functions support outreach engagements direct to those
experiencing homelessness in the field: homeless/housing navigators and Nonprofit partners,
Police Departments directly involved in implementing a CWA. Broader public audiences will
17
receive informational push notifications and media alerts through Jefferson County Public Affairs
Team.
Homeless Navigation
Jefferson County relies on County/City homeless navigators along with outreach teams from
Public Health and Jefferson Center to identify people who are unsheltered. Upon declaration, and
throughout the 72-hour lead period and course of a CWA, these teams will work together to
intentionally connect people in unsheltered homelessness with the necessary information to
create a plan to access shelter during the CWA. These efforts may be supported by the Sheriff’s
Office, Open Space, local Police Departments, Parks and Recreation, co-responder teams, or
others in a first-responder capacity.
CWA Transportation
During CWA, the Parties agree to transport people to/from shelter to the extent possible given that
severe weather conditions may limit travel due to poor driving conditions, closures, and safety
concerns. Homeless Navigators, and shelter staff, have access to RTD passes that may be provided
to persons needing shelter during CWA. Additionally, Jefferson County manages a Lyft Concierge
account that can be utilized during CWA when Lyft is operational. Transportation is not
guaranteed during CWA. All participating jurisdictions agree to provide transportation supports to
impacted guests to the best of their abilities and agree that in some condition’s transportation
options will not be available. Prenotifications using currently defined communication channels is
critical to ensure all unhoused individuals have advanced notice of impending weather changes in
order to access sheltering options as early as possible.
Motel Vouchering
During CWA, motel vouchers will be issued to families and singles who meet eligibility criteria.
Determinations are based on vulnerability with conditions that limit access to congregate shelter
due to health conditions or other qualifying circumstances. Severe weather hotel vouchers can be
used to book motel rooms at one of the partnering motels across the county. Motel rooms will be
booked on the same day by the issuing agencies.
18
Additional Contribution by Jefferson County - Evergreen Christian Outreach
(EChO) Shelter
For 2025-2026, Jefferson County has proposed ($200,000) funding for operations of EChO
Shelter located in Evergreen, CO. EChO serves as a cold weather shelter every night from
October-April with a capacity of 20 individuals per night. EChO services extend beyond cold
weather sheltering to ensure guests receive basic needs and case management.
Extreme Weather Mobile Shelter Operations
Extreme weather mobile shelter operations will be deployed at the discretion of the County
Office of Emergency Management (OEM”) through the County’s activation of the Emergency
Operations Center through a disaster declaration that activates the County Emergency
Management Plan or Emergency Operations Plan and needed annexes. Jefferson County has
budgeted $250,000 in 2025-2026 to operate mobile shelters during events of extreme cold
weather (forecasts of 10°F or below for at least 48 hours). This funding amount equates to ten
days of extreme cold weather but does not guarantee that such tents will be available for
deployment as such deployment is dependent upon the discretion of the County OEM. If it is
anticipated that the current budgeted funding level will be exhausted, the Parties agree to
convene to determine how to fund any additional extreme weather sheltering needs.
Absent such County declaration, extreme weather mobile sheltering options can be requested by
a Party that is operating under a local disaster declaration and has utilized all other available
local resources. Such a Party may complete a Resource Request Order through its local OEM to
the County OEM. If the County OEM authorizes the request, costs of such deployment shall be
assessed to the requesting Party.
Communications Plan for Extreme Weather Mobile Shelter Operations
County OEM will, in accordance with the Emergency Operations -Local Coordination Annex
Plan, take the lead in coordinating among the Parties communication of the disaster declaration
and activation of the County Emergency Management Plan or Emergency Operations Plan and
needed annexes.
19
Transportation During Extreme Weather Mobile Shelter Operations
County OEM’s activation of the Emergency Operations Center through a disaster declaration
will also activate additional transportation resources through the County OEM.
ITEM NUMBER: 6
DATE: September 22, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION
TITLE: MOTION TO APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS,
COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
☐PUBLIC HEARING ☒BIDS/MOTIONS
☐RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING ☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
In August of 2025, the resignation of one IDEA Committee member was received,
leaving a vacancy on that Committees. There is one nomination and one ratification to
make at this meeting.
PRIOR ACTION:
Members of the City Council appoint members to Boards, Commissions, and
Committees annually and as needed throughout the year when vacancies are filled. The
Mayor will request the appointment of all Alternate and At-Large positions annually and
as needed throughout the year when vacancies are filled as well, and his
recommendation will be ratified by council.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
BACKGROUND:
Each year, the city advertises for residents who might be interested in volunteering on
one of the Boards, Commissions, or Committees. The current vacant position was
advertised through a multi-week promotional campaign including the City’s website,
social media, email, and newsletters.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Mayor Starker
“I nominate Shannon Garcia-Lewis for the At-Large vacant seat on the IDEA Committee,
Council Action Form – Board, Commission, and Committee Appointment
September 22, 2025
Page 2
term to expire March 2, 2028.”
District II Council Member
“I move to ratify Mayor Starker’s nomination of Shannon Garcia-Lewis to the At-Large
IDEA Committee vacant seat, term to expire March 2, 2028.”
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Rhiannon Curry, Executive Assistant
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
Patrick Goff, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 2025 Board, Committee, and Commissions Application Packet
2025 Boards, Commissions, and Committees Appointment Applicant Summary
IDEA Committee - Please consider appointing one of the applicants below into an AL Position on the IDEA Committee - Term Ending 03/02/28
Last Name First Name District Notes Application Hyperlink
Garcia-Lewis Shannon II sgarcialewis@gmail.com
Zeman Ryan III ryan.zeman8@gmail.com
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM NUMBER: 7
DATE: September 22, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
RESOLUTION 48-2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET TO REFLECT
THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $5 MILLION FOR THE
PURPOSE OF ISSUING A CONTRACT AMENDMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $5,374,077.75 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE
IMPROVE WADSWORTH PROJECT TO CONCRETE WORKS
OF COLORADO, INC.
☐PUBLIC HEARING
☐BIDS/MOTIONS
☒RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
The Improve Wadsworth project remains on schedule, with completion expected by
spring of 2026 and active construction finishing by late 2025. Additional work was
added, such as permanent improvements at the 38th Avenue intersection and extending
the work to the original southern limits at 35th Avenue. This was announced in the fall
of 2023 and will ensure long-term cost savings and benefits. Today, over 90% of the
project is complete, including all northbound traffic lanes on concrete pavement. The
purpose of this item is to approve a contract amendment with Concrete Works of
Colorado for a series of change orders that led to increased costs in the amount of
$5,374,077.75.
PRIOR ACTION:
The city awarded a contract to Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. (CWC) for Phase I of
the Improve Wadsworth project on August 23, 2021. On February 27, 2023, the city
approved an amendment for Phase II of the project. The total contract amount for both
phases was $48,493,109.11.
A construction update was provided to City Council at the October 28, 2024 study
session. At that time, additional change orders were estimated at $4.9 million. It was
decided at that time to wait to bring back a contract amendment closer to the project
Council Action Form – Improve Wadsworth Project Contract Amendment
September 22, 2025
Page 2
completion to account for any additional change orders.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funding is not currently available in the General Fund or Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) to fund this entire contract amendment. However, $5 million in funding is available
in the 2J Next Chapter Bond budget reserves which will be transferred to the CIP
Budget. The Improve Wadsworth project is an eligible expense from 2J Bond funds.
Staff had originally anticipated appropriating $12 million of 2J Bond funds through 2030
for annual pavement management. However, those expenses will be diverted back to
the CIP starting in 2026 with a transfer of $3 million from General Fund reserves. In
addition, the 2J Bond budget includes $21.7 million in funding for the 38th West project
between 2025 and 2027. Staff has applied for a $15 million grant for this project which
will offset those expenses if awarded. Staff is fairly confident the City will receive at
least a portion of this grant award.
BACKGROUND:
This project includes modernizing and improving Wadsworth Boulevard from 35th
Avenue to I-70 with efficient and safe intersection designs, safer entrances and exits for
vehicles accessing businesses, a continuous sidewalk on the west, and a bike/pedestrian
path on the east side of Wadsworth from 35th Avenue to the Clear Creek Trail.
The project will construct efficient intersections at 44th Avenue and 38th Avenue called a
continuous flow intersection (CFI). The CFI makes the best use of land for maximum
traffic flow, while prioritizing safety.
A construction contract was awarded to Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. in August 2021
which covered work between approximately I-70 and 41st Avenue. It was necessary to
scale back the original limits of the project (I-70 to 35th Avenue) due to a lack of funding.
Work began in October 2021. In late-2022, the city was notified that an additional $4M in
congressionally directed spending would be received for the project. In February 2023,
the City Council approved a contract amendment to CWC’s contract to expand the project
from 41st Avenue to 35th Avenue, including the CFI at 38th Avenue.
Construction has progressed relatively well however a variety of unknown or unexpected
items have led to cost overruns, including costs to address:
• Removal and disposal of materials from an unidentified dump site at the north end
of the project
• Groundwater remediation
• Asbestos abatement
• Irrigation repairs at various sites
• Sanitary sewer bypass pumping
• Additional underground utility potholing
Council Action Form – Improve Wadsworth Project Contract Amendment
September 22, 2025
Page 3
• Modifications to the underground storm sewer due to unknown, conflicting utilities
• Shear anchors for the retaining wall at the north end of the project
• Additional traffic control
These items, as well as added quantities due to plan errors, have added approximately
$5.4M in costs to the overall construction contract.
Financial Implications
A summary of anticipated costs and expenditures to date is provided below.
Description
Anticipated
Overrun
Approx.
Timeframe Notes
Contaminated
Groundwater $937,582
October
2023 Unforeseen conditions
Soundwall $272,700 August 2024
Decision to include formliner and
anti-graffiti coating
Dispose of
Hazmat from
Pond Excav $1,017,286
January
2022
Unforeseen conditions; includes
landfill expenses and dozer hours to
compensate for trucking
Removal of
Trees $148,640
December
2021
Plans showed 85 removals; project
had 244 removals
Flagging, TCS
& TCI $2,591,039
throughout
project
Plans underestimated the quantities
of these items
Removal of
wall $211,335
Nov-2021 to
May-2024
Many old walls and foundations were
hidden underground and encountered
during excavations
Detour
pavement $1,331,590
Aug-2023 to
Aug-2024
Plans underestimated quantity;
overrun was needed to maintain
required number of travel lanes while
placing concrete pavement
Total: $6,510,172
The current contract with CWC is:
Current CWC Contract $48,493,109.11
Anticipated Construction Cost $53,867,186.86
Change Order Needed $5,374,077.75
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommend approval a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2025 CIP Fund Budget
to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $5
Council Action Form – Improve Wadsworth Project Contract Amendment
September 22, 2025
Page 4
million for the purpose of issuing a contract amendment for construction of the Improve
Wadsworth project to Concrete Works of Colorado.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve Resolution No. 48-2025, a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2025
Capital Improvement Program Budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget
appropriation in the amount of $5 million for the purpose of issuing a contract
amendment in the amount of $5,374,077.75 for construction of the Improve Wadsworth
project to Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc.”
Or,
“I move to table indefinitely Resolution No. 48-2025, a resolution amending the Fiscal
Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program Budget to reflect the approval of a
supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $5 million for the purpose of
issuing a contract amendment in the amount of $5,374,077.75 for construction of the
Improve Wadsworth project to Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. for the following
reason(s).”
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Daniel Martinez, Interim CIP Program Manager
Kent Kisselman, Interim Director of Public Works
Patrick Goff, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 48-2025
2. Contract Amendment
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 48
SERIES OF 2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $5
MILLION FOR THE PURPOSE OF ISSUING A CONTRACT AMENDMENT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $5,374,077.75 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVE
WADSWORTH PROJECT TO CONCRETE WORKS OF COLORADO, INC.
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the importance of improving city streets and
providing multi-modal facilities in various locations to allow for improved and safer
mobility; and
WHEREAS, Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. provided a bid to complete the
Improve Wadsworth Project Phase I and II, which will provide improved infrastructure
along Wadsworth Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. has encountered unforeseen
conditions requiring the amendment of their original contract for the Improve Wadsworth
Project Phase I and II; and
WHEREAS, funds are available in the 2J Next Chapter Bond budget to transfer to
the CIP Fund to cover these expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge Charter requires that amendments to the
budget be affected by the City Council adopting a resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT:
Section 1. A transfer of $5,000,000 is hereby approved from the 2J Next
Chapter Bond budget undesignated reserves to account 30-303-800-865 and the 2025
revenues are amended accordingly.
Section 2. An amended contract in an amount not to exceed $53,867,186.86, is
hereby approved for an agreement with Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 1
DONE AND RESOLVED this 22nd day of September 2025
[SEAL]
____________________________________
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
Bud Starker, Mayor
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
AMENDMENT TO Contract # ITB-21-04
Wadsworth Improvement Project
AMENDMENT #2, Date: September 10, 2025
Pursuant to the original contract with Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. and 1260 Rock Creek Circle, Lafayette, CO
80026, regarding the Wadsworth Improvement Project, the City hereby authorizes the amendment to the contract as
follows:
1.Article 1- Scope of Work:
a.The scope of work remains unchanged, with this amendment addressing only additional costs
associated with unforeseen items over the course of the contract required to complete the Wadsworth
Improvement Project.
2.Article 2- Term
a. Project completion date has not changed.
3.Article 3- Compensation:
a.Compensation under this amendment is increased by $5,374,077.75 to address unforeseen items
necessary to complete the Wadsworth Improvement Project.
b.The revised total contract amount shall not exceed $53,867,186.86
Each party has reviewed the items contained within this contract and recommend executing this contract to proceed
with the agreed upon Statement of Work.
______________________________________ __________
Kelsey Carter, Procurement Coordinator Date Signed
______________________________________ __________
Kent Kisselman, Interim Director of Public Works Date Signed
In Witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this
Amendment in two (2) copies, each of which shall be deemed an original on the date first written.
“CITY” “CONTRACTOR”
City of Wheat Ridge Concrete Works of Colorado, inc.
7500 West 29th Avenue 1260 Rock creek Circle
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lafayette, CO 80026
By: By:
________________________________ ___________________________
Patrick Goff, City Manager Authorized Signature
________________________________ ___________________________
Date Date
___________________________
Title
___________________________
Print or Type Name
ATTACHMENT 2
ITEM NUMBER: 8
DATE: September 22, 2025
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
RESOLUTION NO. 49-2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR AN APPLICATION TO THE
COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE NON-MOTORIZED TRAILS
GRANT PROGRAM
☐PUBLIC HEARING
☐BIDS/MOTIONS ☒RESOLUTIONS
☐ORDINANCES FOR 1st READING
☐ORDINANCES FOR 2nd READING
QUASI-JUDICIAL ☐YES ☒NO
ISSUE:
The Parks and Recreation Department is applying for a Colorado Parks and Wildlife
(CPW) Non-Motorized Trails grant for funding to install wayfinding and safety signage
along the Clear Creek Trail and throughout the Wheat Ridge Greenbelt network. A
resolution of support is required from City Council to apply for this grant.
PRIOR ACTION:
There has been no prior action taken by Council on this issue.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The estimated total cost for this project is approximately $90,000 in 2026. The City has
previously secured approximately $45,000 in grant funds from Jefferson County Open
Space for this project. The Parks and Recreation Department planned on providing the
remaining $45,000 in project costs from the Open Space Special Fund.
If Council passes this Resolution and the grant application is awarded the requested
$45,000 in funding, this entire project could be completed with minimal city funds. The
City has budgeted the full project cost in 2026 in the Open Space special fund and
would be reimbursed after the project by both Jefferson County and CPW (if this
application is awarded funding).
BACKGROUND:
In 2022, the City was awarded 50% project grant funds (up to about $45,000) to install
wayfinding and safety signage along Clear Creek Trail from Jefferson County Open
Space. This grant application to CPW would cover all, or at least most, of the city’s
Council Action Form – Resolution Supporting CPW Non-Motorized Trails Grant
September 22, 2025
Page 2
contributions towards installing these wayfinding and safety signs.
Since 2022, the City, Jefferson County, and other trail-managing agencies have been
collaborating on a consistent, trail-long wayfinding signage system. That planning work
is nearing completion with signs hopefully being installed in 2026.
Wayfinding signage, trail safety, and the trail user experience were key takeaways from
the 2023 Open Space Management Plan. Wayfinding signs will include directions and
distances to parks, schools, business districts, and trail connections. Safety signage will
include making users aware of upcoming intersections, sight obstructions, speed limits,
areas for potential ice buildup, and busy areas such as parks.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommend passing this Resolution to make a Colorado Parks and Wildlife
funding application eligible for State consideration.
An alternative is to not apply for this funding and continue with the city contributing 50%
of the project cost.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
“I move to approve Resolution 49-2025, a resolution of support for an application to the
Colorado Parks and Wildlife Non-Motorized Trails Grant program.”
Or,
“I move to postpone indefinitely Resolution 49-2025, a resolution of support for an
application to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Non-Motorized Trails Grant program for
the following reason(s).”
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Brandon Altenburg, Grant and Special Project Administrator
Karen O’Donnell, Parks and Recreation Director
Patrick Goff, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 49-2025
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 49
SERIES OF 2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR AN APPLICATION TO THE
COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE NON-MOTORIZED TRAILS
GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado (the “City”) is interested in
maintaining and improving Clear Creek Trail access, safety, connectivity, and the user
experience; and
WHEREAS, improving wayfinding signage and trail safety were key takeaways
from the public engagement phase of the 2023 Open Space Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Non-Motorized Trails Grant Program
exists as a potential funding partner for trail-related projects; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to submit an application to this program to request
funds to install wayfinding and safety signage along the Clear Creek Trail; and
WHEREAS, City Council supports a funding application to the Colorado Parks and
Wildlife Non-Motorized Trails Grant Program to request $45,000 in funding for this
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT:
Section 1. The Mayor or the City Manager of the City or any other member of
the City Council and all appropriate City officers are hereby authorized and directed to
execute and deliver and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to attest and
deliver such other agreements and certificates and to take such other actions as may be
necessary or convenient to carry out and give effect to the Assignment and this
Resolution.
Section 2. Nothing contained in this Resolution, or the Assignment shall
constitute a debt, indebtedness, or multiple-fiscal year direct or indirect debt or other
financial obligation of the City within the meaning of the Constitution or statutes of the
State or the home rule charter of any political subdivision thereof, nor give rise to a
pecuniary liability of the City or a charge against its general credit or taxing powers.
Section 3. If any section, paragraph, clause, or provision of this Resolution shall
for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of
any such section, paragraph, clause, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining
provisions of this Resolution.
Section 4. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
approval.
DONE AND RESOLVED this 22nd day of September 2025
[SEAL]
ATTEST:
Margy Greer, Sr. Deputy City Clerk
Bud Starker, Mayor