HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Packet 09/10/20126:30p.m.-Reception Wheat Ridge Business District 10th Anniversary
6:45 p.m. Pre-Meeting
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
September 10, 2012
7:00p.m.
Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by
the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer, at 303-235-2826 at
least one week in advance of a meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion
assistance.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF August 27. 2012
PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES
Wheat Ridge Business District 1 01h Anniversary
CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK
a. Citizens, who wish, may speak on any matter not on the Agenda for a maximum of 3
Minutes and sign the Public Comment Roster.
b. Citizens who wish to speak on Agenda Items, please sign the GENERAL AGENDA
ROSTER or appropriate PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER before the item is called to be
heard.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING
.L Council Bill No. 17-2012 -An Ordinance adding a new Section 26-638 to Chapter 26 of
the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning Zoning, to define Occupancy Limits and
authorize the enforcement of such limits as a Civil Matter
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: September 10, 2012 Page -2-
PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING con't
2. Council Bill No. 18-2012 -An Ordinance amending Subsection 4-34(E) of the Wheat
Ridge Code of Laws, concerning Kennel License requirements, to prohibit Variances
that conflict with the City's Zoning Regulations
3. Council Bill No. 19-2012 -An Ordinance amending Section 24-51 of the Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws, concerning Weed and Tall Grass Control, to authorize Abatement of
Violations thereof and Abatement Cost Recovery through Nuisance Enforcement and
Administrative Enforcement
4. Resolution 44-2012-A Resolution approving a Special Use Permit to allow
reconstruction of a Quasi-Public Facility and a Major Haul Operation with variances in a
Residential-One (R-1) Zone District located at 2901 Fenton Street (Case No. Sup-12-
03/Ashland Reservoir)
DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS
~ Resolution 45-2012-A Resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement with the
City and County of Denver regarding Denver Water's Ashland Reservoir
CITY MANAGER'S MATTERS
CITY ATTORNEY'S MATTERS
ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS
ADJOURNMENT to Special Study Session
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL BLUILDING
7500 W. 29TH AVENUE
August 27. 2012
Mayor D~Tullio called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Davis Reinhart
Bud Starker
Joyce Jay
Mike Stites
George Pond
Joseph DeMott
Tracy Langworthy
Kristi Davis
Also present: City Clerk, Janelle Shaver; City Attorney, Gerald Dahl; City Manager,
Patrick Goff; Acting Police Chief, Joe Cassa; Public Works Director, Tim Paranto;
interested parties and interested citizens.
CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK
Bob Doyle, member of the Colorado Tobacco Prevention Education Alliance and
Breathe Easy Wheat Ridge, spoke against the hookah lounge that is scheduled to open
in Wheat Ridge. He believes this type of establishment is not good for our community
because it entices youth with tobacco of multiple flavors.
John Odom, Wheat Ridge resident and surgeon, listed the negative medical effects of
smoke from hookah lounges. He wishes Wheat Ridge had tighter laws on smoking.
Laurie Odom, Wheat Ridge resident and physician, spoke against the hookah lounge.
She implored Council to try to make Wheat Ridge the healthiest community in this
region and pass local laws that prohibit hookah lounges from operating in the city.
Sarah Davis, chair of Breathe Easy Wheat Ridge, spoke about how surrounding cities
have closed the loopholes to prevent hookah lounges from coming in.
Michael Snow spoke against the hookah lounge. He thinks it's a deplorable business
that is not healthy and not attractive to strong families. He believes it's Council's job to
protect the health, safety and public welfare of its citizens and noted that surveys say
restricting smoking will not harm businesses.
Tom Slattery of Wheat Ridge United Neighborhoods requested the use of Council
Chambers on Thursday, September 27 from 7 -10 PM for the election preview forum
they always conduct. The back-up date would be September 28th_
Cheri Jahn came to thank the City of Wheat Ridge for all their efforts for the Carnation
Festival -especially Joyce Manwaring and her staff and the Police Department. The
great success of this year's festival would not have happened without them. She also
reported a record crowd this year-estimated at 25,000-30,000 for the two nights.
Gina Hallisey, promoter for the Zoppe Circus, thanked the City and all the sponsors for
their support. This is the best attendance and participation this circus has ever had and
they are excited to return next year. She will have a full report for Council in the near
future.
John Marriott, chair of Wheat Ridge Business District, spoke on several things:
1) He thanked Joyce Manwaring for keeping the outdoor pool open while the Rec
Center pool is being cleaned, 2) Last week there was talk of crafting a muffler
ordinance. He researched Denver's muffler ordinance and since it was enacted they
have written 4, 5, and 0 tickets each year. He suggested that such an ordinance in
Wheat Ridge would be a feel good/do nothing ordinance that won't be enforced, 3) He
doesn't think an anti-smoking ordinance is necessary. He thinks it's a feel good
ordinance and that state law is adequate. He's never had an issue with second hand
smoke in a park, and 4) Regarding hookah lounges, they should just follow state law.
Connie Mauldin from unincorporated Jefferson County immediately west of Wheat
Ridge spoke against the new animated sign at Good Times. It's lit up 24 hours a day
and is very annoying to nearby residents at night. The neighbors wish that Good Times
would have to turn off the sign when they close for the night. Code Enforcement has
been very cooperative, but the owners of Good Times aren't'. It appears that a different
ordinance is necessary to govern animated sighs.
Motion by Joe DeMott to direct staff to work with Wheat Ridge United Neighborhoods to
allow and fund if necessary on September 27 their 2012 candidate forum as they have
done so well in the past; seconded by Mr. Reinhart; carried 8-0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF August 13,2012
Motion by Mr. Stites to approve the minutes of August 13, 2012; seconded by Mr.
Starker; carried 7-0, with Mr. Reinhart abstaining.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mrs. Jay introduced the Consent Agenda .
.1. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Motion to approve payment to Insight Public Sector, Inc. in the amount of
$51,618.51 for the annual renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement
B. Motion to accept Independence Street right-of-way from the City of Arvada
C. Motion to award RFB-12-28-On-Call Traffic Signal Maintenance & Repair
Services to W.L. Contractors, Inc. of Arvada, Colorado, in an amount not to
exceed $55,000
Motion by Mrs. Jay to approve the Consent Agenda; seconded by Mr. Stites and Mr.
DeMott; carried 8-0
PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING
~. Council Bill No. 14-2012-An Ordinance amending Section 26-603 of Chapter
26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning regulation of sight distance triangles
and swimming pool fences (Case No. ZOA-11-06)
Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing.
Mr. Pond introduced Council Bill No. 14-2012.
Current regulations to sight distance triangles are difficult to apply, enforce, and explain.
In the same section of the zoning code, requirements for swimming pool fences do not
correspond with adopted versions if the building code.
Clerk Shaver assigned Ordinance No. 1518
Lauren Mikulak gave the staff presentation. She entered into the record the case file,
the draft ordinance and the contents of the digital presentation, and documented that
public noticing requirements for this hearing had been met. This change is brought
forward because it has been difficult to locate sight distance triangles in the field.
Several departments of the City (Publics Works, Police, Code Enforcement, Parks and
Rec and Community Development) have given input to the proposal.
It will:
• Move the sight triangle out towards the street to the true corner
• Improve the ability to explain and field locate sight distance triangles
• Provide ease of enforcement and relieve the burden on the property owners
• Put us more in line with national standards
• Raise the upper limits of the clear zone to accommodate truck drivers
• Upgrade diagrams
• Align zoning and building codes related to swimming pool fences
• Reorganize the fence code section
• Defer to the International Building Code for pool fences
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Motion by Mr. Pond to approve Council Bill No. 14-2012, an Ordinance amending
Section 26-603 of Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning regulation
of sight distance triangles and swimming pool fences on second reading and that it take
effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by Mr. Stites; carried 8-0
3. Council Bill No. 15-2012-An Ordinance submitting a proposed amendment of
the Wheat Ridge Home Rule Charter to the voters of the City pursuant to Charter
section 16.8 (b), setting the ballot title for same.
Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing
Ms. Davis introduced Council Bill No. 15-2012 . This Charter amendment would provide
that all elected officials be elected by the most votes cast.
Mr. Dahl clarified the content of the ballot wording.
Mrs. Shaver thanked the current Election Commission members, Lloyd Levy and
Wanda Sang, for their work leading to the recommendation of this charter change-
which was unanimous. She also thanked former City Clerk Michael Snow for his
valuable input since he was the one who conducted the runoff election last fall, and also
former Commission Member, Peter Marks.
Lloyd Levy addressed the proposed charter change that the Election Commission is
recommending. Last fall the regular election on November 1 cost the City $7,500
because we were/are able to piggy-back on the county's election process. The run-off
election that followed, which the City had to conduct and fund entirely on its own, cost
around $37,000. The suggested change would have all elected officials chosen by
popular vote (whoever gets the most votes wins), thereby eliminating the possibility of
any future, expensive run-off elections. He assured the public and the Council that
adopting this process does not violate any principles of fairness, openness, or the
representative process.
Clerk Shaver assigned Ordinance No. 1519.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Motion by Ms. Davis to approve Council Bill No. 15-2012 -An Ordinance submitting a
proposed amendment of the Wheat Ridge Home Rule Charter to the voters of the City
pursuant to charter section 16.8 (b), and setting the ballot title for same on second
reading and have it take effect upon adoption. Seconded by Mr. DeMott; carried 8-0
4. Council Bill No. 16-2012-An Ordinance amending Section 16-103 of the
Wheat Ridge Code of Laws concerning unreasonable noise and providing for
a special events permit for amplified sound on private property
Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing.
Mr. DeMott introduced Council Bill No. 16-2012. This amendment to the code would
provide for a special use permit process for amplified sound events.
Clerk Shaver assigned Ordinance No. 1520.
Staff: Mr. Dahl noted he added the Mixed Use zone district since first reading.
Public comment
Moe Keller had a handout and updated Council on the current attitude of the Iris Street
neighborhood. They prefer that the current noise ordinance remain unamended, that it
is adequate for enforcement and they do not want the noise levels raised. If Council still
wants to approve this ordinance she suggested these issues be addressed first
• There is no time limit for the special event permit. They suggest 4 hours.
• Applicants have an appeal process, but neighbors don't.
• Address the impacts on surrounding neighborhoods, including adequate parking
and excessive traffic volume. Public safety is a concern.
Laura Jenkins, of Iris Street, added her support for not having a special use permit in
the noise ordinance. She thinks loopholes will be used.
Steve Keller said the neighborhood doesn't see a pressing need to approve a special
events permit. If council plans to approve the permit process he added further:
• Limit the number of events per year. Four is good, but allow more if there are no
complaints, fewer if there are complaints.
• The application be posted prior to being granted so neighbors are aware of it.
Mayor DiTullio closed the public hearing.
Motion by Mr. DeMott to postpone indefinitely Council Bill No. 16-2012 an ordinance
amending Section 16-1 03 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws concerning unreasonable
noise and providing for a special events permit for amplified sound on private property
for the following reasons: Some confusion still exists and we have a little bit more work
to do on it; seconded by Mr. Langworthy; carried 8-0
ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING
5. Council Bill No. 17-2012-An Ordinance adding a new Section 26-638 to Chapter
26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning zoning, to define occupancy
limits and authorize the enforcement of such limits as a civil matter
Mr. Starker introduced Council Bill No. 17-2012.
This ordinance would provide for one single code section to govern residential
occupancy limits. It will help public understanding of what is permitted and prohibited,
as well as facilitate City enforcement.
Motion by Mr. Starker to approve Council Bill No. 17-2012 -An Ordinance adding a
new
Section 26-638 to Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning zoning, to
define occupancy limits and authorize the enforcement of such limits as a civil matter,
on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, September 10, 2012
at 7 .m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, and that it take effect 15 days after final
publication. Seconded by Mr. Pond ; carried 8-0.
Q. Council Bill No. 18-2012 -An Ordinance amending Subsection 4-34(e) of the
Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning kennel license requirements, to prohibit
variances that conflict with the City's zoning regulations
Mr. Stites introduced Council Bill No. 18-2012
This ordinance would prohibit the Police Chief from granting variances under Section 4-
34 that proposes a use of land prohibited by the City's zoning regulations in Chapter 26.
Motion by Mr. Stites to approve Council Bill No. 18-2012, an ordinance amending
subsection 4-34(e) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning kennel license
requirements, to prohibit variances that conflict with the City's zoning regulations, on
first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, September 10, 2012 at 7
p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, and that it take effect 15 days after final
publication; seconded by Mr. DeMott; carried 8-0
z. Council Bill No. 19-2012-An Ordinance amending Section 24-51 of the Wheat
Ridge Code of Laws, concerning weed and tall grass control, to authorize
abatement of violations thereof and abatement cost recovery through nuisance
enforcement and administrative enforcement
Mrs. Langworthy introduced Council Bill No. 19-2012.
This ordinance would provide property owners with the opportunity for a pre-abatement
hearing (due process), and make the abatement cost recovery process and
administrative fees consistent with other abatement actions.
Motion by Mrs. Langworthy to approve Council Bill No. 19-2012, an ordinance
amending section 24-51 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning weed and tall
grass control, to authorize abatement of violations thereof through nuisance
enforcement and administrative enforcement, on first reading , order it published, public
hearing set for Monday, September 10, 2012 at 7 p.m. in the City Hall Council
Chambers, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by Mr.
Starker; carried 8-0.
DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS
8. Resolution 42-2012-authorizing the execution of an agreement allowing
Walrus 5560 LLC to participate in the Wheat Ridge Business Development
Zone Program and for the rebate of eligible City fees, charges and taxes in
an amount not to exceed $25,500 in association with the demolition and
remodel of a facility at 5560 W. 29th Ave.
Mr. Starker, being the owner of Walrus 5560 and applicant for this rebate, recused
himself and left the room.
Mr. Reinhart introduced Resolution 42-2012.
Motion by Mr. Reinhart to approve Resolution 42-2012, a resolution authorizing the
execution of an agreement allowing Walrus 5560 LLC to participate in the Wheat Ridge
Business Development Zone Program and for the rebate of building use tax in an
amount not to exceed $25,500 in association with the demolition and remodel of a
facility at 5560 W. 29th Avenue in Wheat Ridge; seconded by Mrs. Jay.
Mr. Dahl noted that in this context a majority vote of the entire Council is required for
passage. Even though Mr. Starker will not be voting--five votes are still required.
Bud Starker is requesting to enter into the recently formed Business District Zone (BDZ)
program for the rebate of eligible City fees, charges and taxes in association with a
proposed partial demolition and remodel of a facility at 5560 W. 29th Avenue. The
improvement cost of this demolition and remodel will generate approximately $25,500 in
building use tax. The financial impact to the City will be the rebate of 100% of the
building use tax, not to exceed $25,500.
Issues were raised about whether this is appropriate. Historically only long standing
businesses such as King Soopers, or non-profits such as Head Start and the Seniors
Resource Center have received 1 00% rebates like this. Mr. Starker is also receiving
grants from WR 2020 and the 38th Avenue Merchants' Group ($13,000). It looks like a
good plan, but this business is not even open yet. We didn't see this at a study session.
Can we find another way to help these kinds of start-ups? These rebates have never
been given to restaurants or new business. Approving this would set a precedent.
Mr. Dahl noted the dollar amount or the percentage could be changed.
Mr. Goff explained that only building use tax would be rebated. Other fees will be
collected. Rebates are given only after the Certificate of Occupancy is granted. Code
allows Council to give the rebate at a different time if they wish, or change the
percentage; in this case staff is recommending 100%. Another alternative would be an
ESTIP grant.
Considerable discussion followed and there was general agreement that this needed to
come to a study session so there could be some discussion. This will affect future
applicants with similar circumstances and setting a precedent tonight, without
discussion, was not a good way to proceed.
Motion by Davis Reinhart to continue Resolution 42-2012 to the September 1oth Study
Session; seconded by Mrs. Jay; carried 7-0
Mr. Starker returned to the Council Chambers.
9. Resolution 43-2012 -concerning the Jefferson County School District R-1's
bond issue and mill levy override issue on the November 6, 2012 general election ballot
Mr. Pond introduced Resolution 43-2012 and listed reasons why the Jefferson County
School Board is bringing a mill levy override and a bond issue to the voters.
Motion by Mr. Pond to approve Resolution 43-2012, a resolution of the Wheat Ridge
City Council concerning that Jefferson County School District R-1's bond issue and mill
levy override on the November 6, 2012 general election ballot; seconded by Mrs.
Langworthy.
Jonna Levine of Arvada addressed the Council in support of the School Board's ballot
issues. The school district has a good record of success, but money from the state has
been cut severely the last three years, as well as cuts from the school district. The
School Board's position is that these ballot measures are necessary to ensure a quality
level of education continues. She asked the Council to endorse the ballot issues.
All of the Council members gave their opinions about the ballot issue.
Motion carried 5-3, with Council members DeMott, Stites, and Davis voting no.
CITY MANAGER'S MATTERS
Mr. Goff reminded the public that the Rec Center is closed this week for annual
maintenance, but folks can use the Golden Rec Center. He's added he's proud of
staff's work to make the Carnation Festival and the Zoppe Circus successful.
CITY ATTORNEY'S MATTERS none
ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS
Mrs. Shaver said she loved the circus and hope it comes back next year.
Mr. DeMott commented on how much fun the festival was and the circus. It was all a
great success.
Mrs. Jay mentioned a woman she saw madly pulling weeds on Wadsworth in the
vicinity of 44th & Wadsworth. She credited Councilmember Stites for this.
Ms. Davis thanked the city and volunteers for their work on the Carnation Festival. She
also gave a shout out to her neighborhood for the successful block party they had. She
thanked the police department for their help and encouraged other neighborhoods to do
the same because it really brings your neighborhood together. She volunteered to help
any neighborhood that wants to have one.
Mrs. Langworthy said she volunteered on the festival shuttle busses. They weren't
very full and she encouraged folks to use them next year.
Mr. Starker also thanked the staff, the Police and the Parks people who helped with the
Carnation Festival and the Circus. He thanked the citizens who came out to watch the
parade and attend the festival and the circus.
Mayor DiTullio thanked people for their work and support for the Circus, and offered
congratulations to the Carnation Festival.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:54 p.m.
Mike Stites, Council President
~ . ~
r-City of JP' WheatR!_dge
ITEM NO:
DATE: September I 0, 2012
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 17-2012-AN ORDINANCE ADDING A
NEW SECTION 26-638 TO CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT
RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, CONCERNING ZONING, TO
DEFINE OCCUPANCY LIMITS AND AUTHORIZE THE
ENFORCEMENT OF SUCH LIMITS AS A CIVIL MATTER
r8J PUBLIC HEARING
0 BIDS/MOTIONS
0 RESOLUTIONS
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
ISSUE:
0 ORDINANCES FOR 15T READING (08/27/2012)
r8J ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (09110/2012)
0 YES
The City's zoning regulations, found in Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws ("Code"),
currently limit the number of unrelated individuals who may reside in a residential dwelling unit,
by virtue of the definitions of"family" and "dwelling unit," and the use schedules and tables
located in various sections throughout the Chapter. This Ordinance adopts a single Code section
concerning residential occupancy limits. Staff believes this amendment will facilitate public
understanding of what is pennitted and prohibited, as well as facilitate City enforcement.
This Ordinance also designates a violation of its requirements as a civil matter, for which
violators may not be sentenced to jail, and for which the City's burden of proof is by a
preponderance of the evidence. Staff believes these civil standards are more appropriate for
occupancy limit enforcement than criminal standards (potential jail time and proof beyond a
reasonable doubt).
PRIOR ACTION:
This ordinance was reviewed with the City Council at the August 20, 2012 Study
Session, and again on First Reading on August 27, 2012.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
Council Action Fonn-Occupancy Limits
September 10, 2012
Page 2
BACKGROUND:
The enforcement of residential occupancy limitations presents several challenges for Community
Service Officers (CSOs) under current Code language. The preparation of a thorough citation or
summons for a violation of such limitations involves referencing and citing several different
Code sections. As such, the potential for technical error in preparing these citations is h>reater
than with other types of citations. The Code does not contain one stand-alone section that
detines occupancy limits and requires compliance with the same. Staffbelieves that adopting
such a singular Code section will facilitate the preparation of valid citations by CSOs as well as
clarify occupancy limitations for the public.
Another challenge presented by occupancy limit enforcement is the gathering of evidence
sufficient to prove violations beyond a reasonable doubt. To meet that burden of proof in regard
to who lives in a particular home requires regular, round-the-clock observation of the home over
a period of time. It is impossible for the Police Department to devote resources to such a task. It
is unrealistic to expect a complaining neighbor or other citizens to collect and provide this level
of evidence. If occupancy limit violations were designated as a civil matter, violators would not
be subject to jail time and the City's burden of proof would be by a preponderance of the
evidence. Statl believes that both the lower classification of penalty and lower burden of proof
are more appropriate than the criminal standard for occupancy limit violations.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Council Bill No. 17-7012, an ordinance adding a new section 26-638 to
chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning zoning, to detine occupancy limits and
authorize the enforcement of such limits as a civil matter, on second reading, and that it takes
ctlect 15 days after final publication."
Or,
")move to postpone indefinitely Council Bill No. 17-2012, an ordinance adding a new section
26-638 to chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning zoning, to detine occupancy
limits and authorize the enforcement of such lim its as a civil matter tor the following reason( s)
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Daniel G. Brennan, Chief of Police
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Council Bill No.17-2012
TITLE:
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER STARKER
Council Bill No. 17
Ordinance No. ----Series of 2012
AN ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW SECTION 26-638 TO CHAPTER 26 OF
THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, CONCERNING ZONING, TO
DEFINE OCCUPANCY LIMITS AND AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT
OF SUCH LIMITS AS A CIVIL MATTER
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado (the "City"), is a Colorado home rule
municipality, duly organized and existing pursuant to Section 6 of Article XX of the Colorado
Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to its home rule authority and Article 23 of Title 31 of the Colorado
Revised Statutes, the City, acting through its City Council (the "Council"), previously adopted
planning and zoning regulations, codified as Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (the
"Code"); and
WHEREAS, the City's zoning regulations currently limit the number of unrelated individuals
who may reside in a residential dwelling unit by virtue of the definitions of "family," "dwelling unit,"
and the permitted use schedule and table codified in various sections throughout Chapter 26 of
the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that adopting a single Code section concerning occupancy
limits in regards to dwelling units would facilitate public understanding of what is permitted and
prohibited as well as facilitate the City's enforcement of the occupancy limits; and
WHEREAS, the Council further finds that it is appropriate and desirable to designate a
violation of such occupancy limits as a civil matter, for which violators may not be sentenced to jail
and for which the City's burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO:
Section 1. Article VI of Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning
zoning supplementary regulations, is hereby amended by the addition of a new Section 26-638, to
read in its entirety as follows:
Sec. 26-638. Occupancy Limits.
A. Except as provided in subsections B. and E. hereof, the maximum occupancy
allowed per dwelling unit in a one-family, two-family or multi-family dwelling shall
be either:
1. One ( 1) family, as defined by Section 26-123 of this Code, and not
more than one (1) additional person; or
2. Two (2) adults and their dependents, if any, and not more than one (1)
additional person.
Attachment 1
B. Exceptions. The following shall be exempt from the maximum occupancy
limit established in Subsection A above:
1. Residential group homes that conform to the requirements of Section
26-612 of this Code; and
2. Dwellings owned and operated by a nonprofit organization incorporated
under the laws of this state for the purpose of providing housing to victims
of domestic violence as such is defined in C.R.S. § 18-6-800.03.
C. A violation of this Section shall be proven by a preponderance of the
evidence. The owner and any other person responsible for the management or
control of a dwelling unit shall be liable for allowing occupancy in excess of this
Section if he or she knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known,
that a violation of this Section was occurring.
D. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this
Section, shall have the following meanings:
1. Adult shall mean any person eighteen (18) years of age or older who
is not a dependent.
2. Dependent shall mean the biological child of an adult occupying a
dwelling unit, or a person related to an adult by reason of adoption,
guardianship or other duly authorized custodial relationship, who receives
financial support from the adult and who resides with the adult in the
dwelling unit at least three (3) calendar months in a calendar year.
3. Occupancy or occupy shall mean the use of a dwelling unit or any
portion thereof for living and sleeping purposes by a person acting in any
of the following capacities:
a. As an owner of the unit;
b. As a tenant under an express or implied lease or sublease of
the unit or of any portion thereof;
c. As the dependent of such an owner or tenant; or
d. As a guest or invitee of the owner, property manager, lessee or
sublessee of the unit or of the dependent of any of the same, if
such guest or invitee stays overnight at the unit for a total of thirty
(30) or more days within any twelve-month period.
E. Nothing in this Section shall operate to amend, abrogate or otherwise affect
the validity of occupancy limitations as applied to building standards and
regulations of the City, as set forth in Chapter 5 of this Code, including all
technical codes adopted by reference therein. In the event of a conflict between
two applicable occupancy standards, the stricter (lower) occupancy limit shall
apply.
2
Section 2. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares
that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that
it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this Ordinance is
necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience
and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
proper legislative object sought to be attained.
Section 3. Severability; Conflicting Ordinances Repealed. If any section, subsection or
clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of
the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other
ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after final
publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter.
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 27th
day of August, 2012, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of
Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for September 10, 2012,
at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of
___ to , this day of , 2012.
SIGNED by the Mayor on this ____ day of _________ , 2012.
ATTEST:
Janelle Shaver, City Clerk
First Publication: August 30, 2012
Second Publication:
Wheat Ridge Transcript
Effective Date:
Jerry DiTullio, Mayor
Approved As To Form
Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney
3
~ J ~
... .. City of JP' WheatRL._dge
ITEM NO: ~-
DATE: September 10, 2012
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 18-2012 AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING SUBSECTION 4-34(E) OF THE WHEAT RIDGE
CODE OF LAWS, CONCERNING KENNEL LICENSE
REQUIREMENTS, TO PROHIBIT VARIANCES THAT
CONFLICT WITH THE CITY'S ZONING REGULATIONS
C8J PUBLIC HEARING
D BIDS/MOTIONS
0 RESOLUTIONS
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
ISSUE:
0 ORDINANCES FOR I sr READING (08/27/2012)
C8J ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (09110/2012)
D YES
Section 4-34 ofthe Wheat Ridge Code of Laws ("Code") requires a person who wishes to keep
more than three dogs or four cats or who wishes to operate a commercial kennel business to
obtain a kennel license from the Chief of Police. The Chief is further authorized to grant
variances from this Section.
The current language of the Code does not authorize the Chief to consider whether a requested
variance is consistent with the City's zoning regulations, found in Chapter 26 of the Code. As a
result, the Chief could potentially approve a kennel license variance to keep a certain number of
animals, or to conduct a business that is nonetheless prohibited in its proposed location by the
City's zoning regulations.
This Ordinance prohibits the Chief from brranting a variance under Section 4-34 that proposes a
use of land prohibited by the City's zoning regulations, Chapter 26.
PRIOR ACTION:
This ordinance was reviewed with the City Council at the August 20, 2012 Study
Session, and again on First Reading on August 27,2012.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
Council Action Fonn Amending 4-34 Kennel License Vmiances
September I 0. 2012
Page 2' ··
BACKGROUND:
Section 4-34 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws ("Code") requires any person who wishes to do
the following to obtain a kennel license from the Chief of Police: (I) Keep more than three dogs
or tour cats ofmore than six months of age: or (2) Conduct a commercial business of breeding,
buying, selling, trading, training or boarding cats or dogs. Subsection (e) of this Section
authorizes the Chief of Police to grant variances from the requirements of Section 4-34.
Chapter 26 of the Code, conceming zoning. prohibits the keeping of more than three dogs or four
cats in residential zone districts. These zoning regulations are separate from, and independent ot:
the kennel licensing requirements of Section 4-34. The provisions of Chapter 26 are valid and
enforceable against a property. regardless of the occupant's compliance with Section 4-34. For
example, a resident could obtain a variance from the Chief to keep more than three dogs or f()ur
cats without a kennel license. but that usc of land is still prohibited in residential districts under
the City's zoning regulations. Similarly, a business could apply for a variance from the Chief to
operate a kennel business without a kennel license. If the proposed commercial kennel is located
in a residential district. that use of land would be prohibited by Chapter 26, even ifthe Chief
b,'Tants a license variance under Chapter 4.
StatT recommends this Code amendment to hannonize the provisions of Chapters 4 and 26 of the
Code.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Statl recommends approval of the ordinance.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Council Bill No. 18-2012, an ordinance amending subsection 4-34(e) ofthe
Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. conceming kennel license requirements. to prohibit variances that
conflict with the City's zoning regulations. on second reading. and that it takes effect 15 days
after final publication."
Or,
"I move to postpone indefinitely Council Bill No. 18-2012, an ordinance amending subsection 4-
34(e) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, conceming kennel license requirements. to prohibit
variances that conflict with the City's zoning regulations. for the following reason(s) ___ _
REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY:
Daniel G. Brennan. Chief of Police
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Council Bill No. 18-2012
TITLE:
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER STITES
Council Bill No. 18
Ordinance No. ----Series of 2012
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION 4-34(E) OF THE
WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, CONCERNING KENNEL
LICENSE REQUIREMENTS, TO PROHIBIT VARIANCES THAT
CONFLICT WITH THE CITY'S ZONING REGULATIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado (the "City"), is a Colorado home rule
municipality, duly organized and existing pursuant to Section 6 of Article XX of the Colorado
Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to its home rule authority and C.R.S. § 31-15-401(1)(m), the City,
acting through its City Council (the "Council"), is authorized to regulate the keeping of animals
within the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to this authority, the Council previously adopted dog and cat kennel
license requirements, including the imposition of a maximum number of dogs and cats permitted,
codified as Section 4-34 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws ("Code");
WHEREAS, Code Subsection 4-34(e) authorizes the Chief of Police to grant variances
from the requirements of Section 4-34; and
WHEREAS, in rendering a decision on such a variance application, Code Subsection 4-
34(e) does not currently authorize the Chief of Police to consider whether the keeping of animals
proposed by the variance is permitted or prohibited by the City's zoning regulations, codified as
Chapter 26 of the Code; and
WHEREAS, as a result, the Chief of Police could grant a kennel license variance
application that authorizes a use of property that is prohibited by another portion of the Code; and
WHEREAS, while the City's zoning regulations are valid and enforceable against a
property regardless of action taken by the Chief of Police on a kennel license variance application
for the same property, City staff believes it would provide clarity and consistency to the Code to
prohibit Chapter 4 variances that conflict with the City's zoning regulations.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO:
Section 1. Subsection 4-34(e) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning kennel
license requirements, is hereby amended as follows:
(e) This section shall not apply to and will not be construed to require a
kennel license for any pet shop which sells animals of less than six {6)
months of age.
Any person or business applying for or holding a kennel license must be
currently licensed by the State of Colorado. Pursuant to the Pet Animal Care and
Facilities Act, C.R.S. §§ 35-80-101-35-80-117.
Attachment 1
The issuance of a new kennel license shall be based on the following
minimum requirements:
Application for a new kennel license or for transfer of an existing license shall
be made to and a recommendation of approval obtained from the ANIMAL
WELFARE AND CONTROL commission. The application shall include a detailed
description of the property to be licensed.
The ANIMAL WELFARE AND CONTROL commission may require a public hearing
before a new kennel license is recommended for approval. The hearing shall be posted and
published in the same manner as in section 26-6.
The animal welfare and control commission shall have the authority to conduct a
hearing to consider whether to recommend that the chief of police grant a variance to
subsection (a) above as to the number of animals permitted and the ANIMAL WELFARE
AND CONTROL commission shall inform the chief of police of its decision.
The recommendation of the ANIMAL WELFARE AND CONTROL commission shall be
forwarded to the chief of police, who shall act to approve, approve with conditions, or deny
the application within thirty (30) days of the ANIMAL WELFARE AND CONTROL
commission's recommendation. THE CHIEF OF POLICE SHALL NOT APPROVE A
VARIANCE APPLICATION THAT PROPOSES THE USE OF PROPERTY IN VIOLATION
OF CHAPTER 26 OF THIS CODE.
The chief of police may promulgate rules and regulations to establish minimum
standards for the care and treatment of animals at any facility licensed under this section,
after review and approval by the animal welfare and control commission.
Community service officers or any agent of the chief of police have the authority to
inspect any licensed facility under this section during normal posted business hours.
Violations of any of this section may be brought before the animal welfare and control
commission for review, and a hearing may be initiated by the ANIMAL WELFARE AND
CONTROL commission for suspension, revocation or nonrenewal of the kennel license.
The animal welfare and control commission may recommend, and the chief of police may
revoke, suspend or not renew a license for failure to comply with any of the requirements of
this section. No such action may be taken without prior notice to the licensee and an
opportunity for the licensee to present evidence and testify. No decision by the chief of
police under this section shall bind, alter, or affect a subsequent decision on a subsequent
application, either for a new kennel license or for renewal of an existing license. Nothing in
this section shall affect the independent authority of appropriate city officials to take action
with respect to vicious animals, threats to public safety, or the enforcement of any other
provision of this Code of Laws.
Section 2. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares
that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that
it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this Ordinance is
necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience
and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
proper legislative object sought to be attained.
2
Section 3. Severability; Conflicting Ordinances Repealed. If any section, subsection or
clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of
the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other
ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after final
publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter.
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 27th
day of August, 2012, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of
Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for September 10, 2012,
at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of
___ to , this day of , 2012.
SIGNED by the Mayor on this ___ day of _________ , 2012.
ATTEST:
Janelle Shaver, City Clerk
First Publication: August 30, 2012
Second Publication:
Wheat Ridge Transcript
Effective Date:
Jerry DiTullio, Mayor
Approved As To Form
Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney
3
~ 6
... ~ ,. lily of
JP'Whcat~ge
ITEM NO: 3.
DATE: September 10,2012
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 19-2012 AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING SECTION 24-51 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE
CODE OF LAWS, CONCERNING WEED AND TALL GRASS
CONTROL, TO AUTHORIZE ABATEMENT OF
VIOLATIONS THEREOF AND ABATEMENT COST
RECOVERY THROUGH NUISANCE ENFORCEMENT AND
ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT
~ PUBLIC HEARING
D BIDS/MOTIONS
D RESOLUTIONS
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
-,-,
City Attorney
ISSUE:
0 ORDINANCES FOR I sT READING (08/27/2012)
~ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (09/10/2012)
D YES
City Manager
The weed and tall grass abatement process currently set forth in Section 24-51 ofthe
Wheat Ridge Code of Laws ("Code") authorizes the City to enter property for abatement
purposes upon seven (7) days' notice by posting or mailing. The City Attorney's Office
and Police Department have consulted and recommend that this process be amended, and
abatement pursued under the existing nuisance enforcement and administrative
enforcement processes found elsewhere in the Code. This Ordinance makes those
recommended changes.
PRIOR ACTION:
This ordinance was reviewed with City Council at the August 20. 2012 Study Session .. ,
and again on First Reading on August 27. 2012.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No financial impacts are anticipated with these amendments. The recommended changes
to abatement cost recovery and administrative fee provisions are consistent with current
business practices.
Council Action Fonn Ordinance Section 24-51 Weed Abatement Hearing
September I 0. 2012
Page 2 ~ .
.... .
BACKGROUND:
Code Section 24-51 requires property owners and occupants to control the growth of weeds and
tall grass upon their properties. If a property contains b,Tfass or weeds that violate the
requirements of Section 24-51. current Code language authorizes the City to enter the property to
cut the weeds and b,rrass after providing seven (7) days' notice. The notice may be either posted
on the property or mailed to the owner and occupant.
The City Attorney's oftice reviewed Code Section 24-51, at the request of the Police
Department, for purposes of evaluating this abatement process. The City Attorney's ottice
recommended amending this Code section to provide an owner or occupant the opportunity for a
hearing. before the City enters his or her property to cut weeds or b,Tfass. Providing an
oppm1unity for a hearing provides each owner and occupant with due process.
Two separate portions of the Code currently contain enforcement processes that include an
oppm1unity for a pre-abatement hearing: Chapter 2. concerning administrative enforcement; and
Chapter 15. concerning nuisance enforcement. The Police Department and City Attorney's
otlice conferred to detennine that the most efficient way to provide a pre-abatement hearing
oppm1unity f(x Code Section 24-51 violations is to cross-reference the existing administrative
enforcement process in Chapter 2 of the Code. An emergency situation that presents imminent
danger to the public health. safety or welfare could be immediately abated by the City, without a
hearing. under the provisions of Code Section 15-9. Staff further recommends that the abatement
cost recovery process and administrative fees for abatement actions under Section 24-51 be
consistent with the abatement cost recovery process and tees in place for other abatement
actions. This Ordinance therefore deletes the current reference to tees in Code Section 24-51 and
cross-references the abatement cost recovery process and tees located in Code Section 15-11.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of this Ordinance.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Council Bill No. 19-2012, an ordinance amending section 24-51 of the
Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning weed and tall grass control. to authorize abatement of
violations thereof through nuisance enforcement and administrative enforcement, on second
reading. and that it takes eftect 15 days after tina! publication."
Or
"I move to postpone indefinitely Council Bill No. 19-2012. an ordinance amending Section 24-
51 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. concerning weed and tall grass control. to authorize
abatement of violations thereof through nuisance enforcement and administrative enforcement of
the tollowing reasons(s) ------------------'
Council Action Fonn-Ordinance Section 24-51 Weed Abatement Hearing
September 10,2012
Page 3
REPORT PREPARED BY:
Carmen Beery, City Attomey's Office
Daniel G. Brennan, Chief of Police
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Council Bill No. 19-2011
2. Staff Report-24-51 Amendment.
TITLE:
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER LANGWORTHY
Council Bill No. 19
Ordinance No. ____ _
Series of 2012
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 24-51 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE
OF LAWS, CONCERNING WEED AND TALL GRASS CONTROL, TO
AUTHORIZE ABATEMENT OF VIOLATIONS THEREOF AND ABATEMENT
COST RECOVERY THROUGH NUISANCE ENFORCEMENT AND
ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado (the "City"), is a Colorado home rule
municipality, duly organized and existing pursuant to Section 6 of Article XX of the Colorado
Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to its home rule authority and C.R.S. § 31-15-401, the City, acting
through its City Council (the "Council"), is authorized to declare and abate nuisances and to
declare as unlawful and prohibit activity that is detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to this authority, the Council previously adopted certain requirements
concerning the control of weeds and tall grass upon properties within the City, codified as Section
24-51 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws ("Code"), and declared certain violations thereof to be a
nuisance; and
WHEREAS, Code Section 24-51 currently authorizes the City to summarily abate weeds
and tall grass upon private property after providing the owners and occupants of such property
seven (7) days' written notice; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 2 of the Code, concerning administrative enforcement, provides
property owners with a ten (10) day period to abate certain Code violations, including violations of
Chapter 24; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that, in the interests of consistency, it is desirable to amend
Code Section 24-51 to eliminate the current seven (7) day notice period and to reference the
administrative enforcement process, including a ten (1 0) day notice period, already available to
enforce such violations under Chapter 2 of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is equitable and desirable to provide property owners
and occupants an opportunity to have a hearing on an alleged violation of Code Section 24-51
prior to the City's abatement of any such violation; and
WHEREAS, the Council therefore finds it additionally desirable and internally consistent to
reference the administrative enforcement process of Chapter 2, which includes an opportunity for
a hearing, in Code Section 24-51; and
WHEREAS, the Council further desires to authorize the City to recover its costs to abate
violations of Code Section 24-51 in accordance with the nuisance abatement cost recovery
process set forth in Section 15-11 of the Code.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO:
Attachment 1
Section 1. Section 24-51 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning weed and tall
grass control, is hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 24-51. -Weed and tall grass control.
(a) All owners and occupants of land shall prevent property owned or
occupied by them from becoming overgrown with weeds or tall grass.
(b) It shall be unlawful for the owner or occupant of any undeveloped
property zoned as agricultural, excluding the city's owned or leased
greenbelt natural areas, to permit weeds or tall grass to grow on such
property to a height of more than twelve ( 12) inches within a distance of
one hundred ( 1 00) feet from any public street, highway or park, or within
a distance of one hundred ( 100) feet from property lines adjoining any
residential, commercial, industrial or open zone or use.
(c) Weeds and tall grass shall be controlled by cutting, spraying or other
lawful and suitable method of control. Such methods shall include
irradication ERADICATION, containment and/or suppression, as
appropriate and as deemed by the city to be consistent with 35-5.5-101 et
seq., C.R.S.
(d) It shall be unlawful and shall be deemed a nuisance for the owner of any
property, regardless of its zoning, to allow weeds or tall grass in excess of
twelve ( 12) inches height to grow on the adjacent street or right-of-way,
OR TO VIOLATE ANY OTHER SUBSECTION OF THIS SECTION.
(e) The city may ENFORCE AND ABATE ANY VIOLATION OF THIS
SECTION AS AUTHORIZED BY ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 2 OF THIS
CODE AND RECOVER ITS ABATEMENT COSTS AS AUTHORIZED BY
ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 15 OF THIS CODE. THE ENFORCEMENT
PROCESS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE
INCLUDES A TEN (10) DAY PERIOD TO CURE VIOLATIONS AND AN
OPPORTUNITY FOR A HEARING. THE CITY IS AUTHORIZED TO
FOLLOW THE ABATEMENT COST RECOVERY PROCESS SET
FORTH IN SECTION 15-11 OF THE CODE TO RECOVER ITS
ABATEMENT COSTS AND FEES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THIS
SECTION. notify property owners and occupants in violation of this
section either by posting the property, OF by first class oF certified mail, at
the city's option Such notice shall be dated and shall include a statement
directing that failure to cut and remove the weeds or tall grass within
se't·en (7) days of the notice will result in the city cutting such weeds or tall
grass and the actual cost of the cutting and/or removal, plus
administrath1e foes of twenty fivo (25) percent for tho first cut, fifty (50)
percent for the second cut and seventy five (75) percent for the third cut
within tho same growing season, plus a fifteen (15) percent foe if not paid
within thirty (30) days, charged to the owner notwithstanding the
provisions of section 15 11 (a). SUCH ABATEMENT COSTS AND FEES
ARE RECOVERABLE IN ADDITION TO ANY ADMINISTRATIVE FINE,
FEE OR CHARGE IMPOSED FOR THE SAME VIOLATION PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE.
2
(f) If the owner or occupants shall fail to cut weeds or tall grass, as required
by this section, within seven (7) days after being notified to do so, the city
may direct that the weeds or tall grass be cut and charge the cost thereof
to the owner in the manner permitted by section 24 10
(Fg) This section shall not apply to:
(1) Lots or parcels zoned for and also used for agricultural operations,
or
(2) Lots or parcels larger than twelve thousand, five hundred (12,500)
square feet, under a single ownership, used for the growing and
harvesting of agricultural crops, regardless of the zoning of the
lots or parcels.
(GR) The city may pursue the remedies set forth herein with or without also
filing a complaint in the municipal court, at the city's sole discretion.
(Hf) For the purposes of this section, the following terms shall be defined:
Agricultural crop. Cultivated grain and non-grain plants grown for food or fiber,
including vegetables, fruits, nuts, and nursery plants.
Agricultural operation. A purpose related to the production, harvest, exhibition,
processing or manufacture of agricultural products by a natural person who
cultivates, plants, propagates or nurtures the agricultural products.
Section 2. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares
that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that
it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this Ordinance is
necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience
and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
proper legislative object sought to be attained.
Section 3. Severability; Conflicting Ordinances Repealed. If any section, subsection or
clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of
the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other
ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after final
publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter.
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 27th day
of August, 2012, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat
Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for September 10, 2012, at 7:00
o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of
___ to , this day of , 2012.
3
SIGNED by the Mayor on this ___ day of _________ , 2012.
ATTEST:
Janelle Shaver, City Clerk
First Publication: August 30, 2012
Second Publication:
Wheat Ridge Transcript
Effective Date:
Jerry DiTullio, Mayor
Approved As To Form
Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney
4
~ ' .( ..... _ .,. City of •
~Wheat Ri_dge ~OLICE DEPARTMENT
Memorandum
TO: Mayor DiTullio and City Council
THROUGH: Patrick Goft: City Manager
Daniel Brennan, Chief of Police
FROM: Mary McKenna, Community Services Supervisor
DATE: August 20,2012
SUBJECT: Staff Report-Ordinance Amending Section 24-51 of the Code of Laws
The Community Services Team is empowered with enforcing provisions of Section 24-51,
Vegetation, of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. There are two challenges that have arisen
regarding this code. First, there is no opportunity for property owners or occupants to appeal the
enforcement or abatement provisions related to Section 24-51. Secondly, the time given to
property owners to address code violations conflict with the requirements found in Article V of
Chapter 2.
Chapter 24-51 encourages property owners or occupants to promptly control the t,rrowth of
weeds and t,rrass on their property by cutting, spraying, or any suitable method of control. Tall
grass and weeds in excess of twelve ( 12) inches are considered a nuisance. The ordinance states
the property-owner/occupant shall be issued a notice of violation with a seven (7) day
compliance date. If the owner or occupant fails to cut the weeds or tall grass, as required by the
code, the city may order the abatement of property. The property owner or occupant is then
charged the actual cost of the abatement, plus administrative fees. The code does not currently
provide the owner or occupant the opportunity to appeal, and sets forth a different number of
days in which to comply.
The Code of Laws currently contains two enforcement processes that include the opportunity for
a pre-abatement hearing: Article V of Chapter 2, Administrative Enforcement and Chapter 15,
Nuisances, provide an opportunity to appeal and request a hearing. Chapter 2, Administrative
Enforcement, currently references Chapter 24 in providing administrative penalties that may be
imposed for a violation. In addition, Article V of Chapter 2 sets forth a requirement for a
property owner to comply with a notice of violation or administrative violation at ten ( 1 0) days,
not seven (7).
In reviewing this ordinance, staff recommends the attached revision to Section 24-51, to provide
property owners or occupants with the opportunity to appeal and request a hearing. Providing an
opportunity for a hearing provides prope11y owners and occupants with due process.
There is no financial impact associated with these proposed changes.
Attachment: Draft revision to Section 24-51
Attachment 2
~ . ~
~ 4 ~ City of •
?WheatRL_,dge
ITEMNO: J../.
DATE: September I 0, 2012
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 44-2012-A RESOLUTION APPROVING
A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW RECONSTRUCTION
OF A QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITY AND A MAJOR HAUL
OPERATION WITH VARIANCES IN A RESIDENTIAL-ONE
(R-1) ZONE DISTRICT LOCATED AT 2901 FENTON
STREET (CASE NO. SUP-12-03/ASHLAND RESERVOIR)
[gj PUBLIC HEARING
D BIDS/MOTIONS
[gj RESOLUTIONS
ISSUE:
0 ORDINANCES FOR I sT READING
0 ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Use Penn it (SUP) to allow reconstruction of
the Ashland Reservoir. Included with this request is approval of a major haul operation and
variances from various provisions of the zoning and development code. The property is zoned
Residential-One (R-1) and is located at 2901 Fenton Street.
This case was initiated as an administrative review; however, written comments/objections to the
application were received during the public notice period. When objections are received, the
special use is required to be considered by City Council at a public hearing.
PRIOR ACTI ON:
There has been no previous action by the City concerning the property.
Case No. SUP-I 2-03
September I 0, 20 I 2
Page 2 • . .. . .
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
One-time fees in the amount of $2,784 were submitted with the application. There will also be
building pem1it fees charged and use tax on the materials being used for the project.
BACKGROUND:
The site contains Denver Water's Ashland Reservoir Facility which has two underground
reservoirs with a combined storage capacity of 4 I million gallons of water (I 9 million and 22
million, respectively). The site has been home to a treated water facility since the late I 800's. A
series of upgrades have occurred over the last I 00 years, including the installation of a precast
concrete rooting system in the I 970s. This rooting system exists today and covers a majority of
the site.
The property is bounded by 29th Avenue on the south. Fenton Street on east and 30th A ,·enue on
the north. The elevation ofW. 30th Avenue is nearly 20 feet higher than W. 29th Avenue. Steep
bem1s run along the south and west property lines, and a retaining wall has been constructed
along Fen ton to accommodate the topobrraphy of the site. A small well house is located on the
south side of the property. A chain link fence surrounds the entire property, and the primary
vehicular access point is from W. 30th A venue.
The applicant Denver Water, is requesting a Special Use Pennit to allow reconstruction of the
Ashland Reservoir which is considered a quasi-public use. As part of the reconstruction, a major
haul operation into and out of the site will be occurring. Various sections of the zoning and
development code require variances to allow construction as proposed.
The replacement project is expected to begin construction in October 20 I 2 and take
approximately three years to complete. In addition to replacing and downsizing the reservoirs,
the redesign will reduce the amount of impervious surface and address the aesthetics of the
facility. Following the replacement of the basins, Denver Water will be upgrading piping and
drain lines within surrounding rights-of-way, including Gray Street Fenton Street and W. 29th
A venue to She1idan.
The property is zoned Residential-One (R-I) and has residential neighborhoods on the three
sides. Along Fenton is the Wheat Ridge Manor Nursing facility. Two commercial businesses are
located to the southeast.
This case has been through a standard referral process. The applicant continues to work with all
referral agencies and adjacent cities to resolve issues associated with the reconstruction.
A detailed staff report with an application binder and exhibits are included for additional
background on this application.
A super-majority \'Ote of City Council is required to approve the variance portion of this request.
A simple majority vote is required to appro,·e the Special Use Pennit.
Case No. SUP-12-03
September I 0, 2012
Page 3
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
VARIANCES
"I move to approve requests for variances for building coverage, front yard setback, fence height,
residential screening and construction days and hours associated with Case No. SUP-12-03 for
the following reasons:
Or,
I. There are unique circumstances relative to property use and site configuration.
2. Given the size of the property, the variances should not be discernible.
3. The variances are required to accommodate site configuration, functionality and
safety of the operation and construction requirements.
4. Once construction is finished, there will be no negative impact on the health, safety
and welfare of the area.
5. The criteria used to evaluate a variance support the request."
"[move to postpone indefinitely requests for variances for building coverage. front yard
setback, fence height, residential screening and construction days and hours associated with
Case No. SUP-12-03 for the following reasons:
I.
2.
3."
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
"[ move to approve Resolution No. 44-2012 -a resolution approving a Special Use Pennit
to allow reconstruction of a quasi-public facility and a major haul operation in a Residential-
One (R-1) zone dist1ict located at 2901 Fenton Street, (Case No. SUP-12-03) for the
following reasons:
I. There will be a public benefit as a result of the reconstruction.
2. The proposed SUP will not contribute to blight in the neighborhood.
3. There will be benefits due to increased landscaping and pedestrian connections.
4. There will be no negative impact to utilities, parks, schools or other public facilities and
services.
5. The criteria used to evaluate a Special Use Pennit support the request.
With the following conditions:
I. All representations made during public hearing testimony and as detailed in the case
file shall be adhered to.
2. Denver Water will keep citizens apprised ofthe project status through a regularly
mailed newsletter.
Case No. SUP-12-03
September I 0, 2012
Page 4
Or.
3. Project status meetings will be held with City office personnel as needed.
4. The monitoring station be redesigned to emulate the existing well house on the
property including but not limited to shape, materials used, and glazing or the well
house be rebuilt somewhere else on the site.
5. Perimeter fencing be modi tied to have upright masonry pillars every I 00'.
6. Additional plantings be shown on the western side of the access drive from W. 29111
Avenue."
"I move to postpone indefinitely Resolution No. 44-2012, a resolution approving a request for a
special use penn it to allmv reconstruction of a quasi-public facility and a major haul operation in
a Residential-One (R-1) zone district located at 2901 Fenton Street (Case No. SUP-12-03), for
the following reasons:
I.
2.
3."
REPORT PREPARED BY:
Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner
Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Resolution No. 44-2012
2. Staffreport with exhibits
TITLE:
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
Resolution No. 44
Series 2012
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO
ALLOW RECONSTRUCTION OF A QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITY
AND A MAJOR HAUL OPERATION WITH VARIANCES IN A
RESIDENTIAL-ONE (R-1) ZONE DISTRICT LOCATED AT 2901
FENTON STREET (CASE NO. SUP-12-03/ASHLAND
RESERVOIR)
WHEREAS, Chapter 26, Article I of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws
establishes the procedures for the City's review and approval of Special Use
Permits; and
WHEREAS, an application for a Special Use Permit has been received
from Denver Water to allow reconstruction of the Ashland Reservoir on property
located at 2901 Fenton Street in an R-1 zone district; and,
WHEREAS, such construction will take three years to complete and is
considered a major haul operation; and,
WHEREAS, there are variances requested related to several sections of
the Zoning and Development code; and,
WHEREAS, the request for Special Use Permit began as an
administrative process which registered written comments/objections during the
1 0-day posting and notification period triggering a City Council public hearing;
and,
WHEREAS, all required publishing, posting and notification requirements
for a September 10, 2012 City Council public hearing have been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, as follows
A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW RECONSTRUCTION OF A QUASI-
PUBLIC FACILITY AND A MAJOR HAUL OPERATION WITH VARIANCES
IN A RESIDENTIAL-ONE (R-1) ZONE DISTRICT IS HEREBY APPROVED
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. There will be a public benefit as a result of the reconstruction.
2. The proposed SUP will not contribute to blight in the neighborhood.
3. There will be benefits due to increased landscaping and pedestrian
connections.
4. There will be no negative impact to utilities, parks, schools or other public
facilities and services.
Attachment 1
5. The criteria used to evaluate a Special Use Permit support the request.
With the following conditions:
1. All representations made during public hearing testimony and as detailed
in the case file shall be adhered to.
2. Denver Water will keep citizens apprised of the project status through a
regularly mailed newsletter.
3. Project status meetings will be held with City office personnel as needed.
4. The monitoring station be redesigned to emulate the existing well house
on the property including but not limited to shape, materials used, and
glazing or the well house be rebuilt somewhere else on the site.
5. Perimeter fencing be modified to have upright masonry pillars every 1 00'.
6. Additional plantings be shown on the western side of the access drive
from W. 29th Avenue.
DONE AND RESOLVED by the City Council this 10th day of September, 2012.
By: __________________________ _
Jerry DiTullio, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janelle Shaver, City Clerk
2
~~j~
.... ~ r City of • .. fV Wlieat&__dge ~OMMUNilY DEVELOPMENT
TO: City Council
DATE: August 7, 2012
CASE NO. & NAME:
ACTION REQUESTED:
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
APPROXIMATE AREA:
PRESENT ZONING:
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert
SUP-12-03/ Ashland Reservoir
Special Use Permit for reconstruction of the Ashland Reservoir
and a major haul operation with variances
2901 Fenton Street
Martin Garcia for Denver Water
8.7 acres
Residential-One (R-1)
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) Digital presentation
SUP-12-03/Ash/and Reservoir
Attachment 2
All notification and posting requirements have been met: therefore. there is jurisdiction to make a
decision regarding this request.
I. REQUEST
The applicant has prepared application binders for reference b y City Council which include
int(mnation pertinent to this request (Exhibit I. A lication binder). Throughout this report. there will
be references to the different components of the request which are arranged by tabs in the application
binder. There are also several other exhibits attached separately which will also be referenced in the
report.
The site is zoned Residential-One (R-1 ). a zone district that provides tor high quality, safe, quiet
stable. and low-density residential neighborhoods, and prohibits activities of an y nature which are
incompatible with the low-density residential character. Quasi-govemmental uses are pem1itted in the
R-1 z one district but quasi-govemmental uses with outside storage require a Special Use Pennit
(SUP).
The Special Use Penn it is also required based on the scope of the excavation and fill operations f()r
construdion. The SUP and variance requests are being processed simultaneousl y . The variances
will be addressed separately from the Special Usc Pennit (A lication Binder -Tab A . Leiter of
fntent).
Section 26-114. (Special uses) of the Zoning and Development code defines the purpose of special
uses as follows : "Special uses arc discretionary uses which. if properly designed. developed. operated
and maintained. may be approved tor any specific location within a zone district wherein the special
use is enumerated. The primary issues to be addressed are those related to justification of need and
special design and operational considerations which mitigate potential detrimental impacts of a special
usc on surrounding land uses, the street system, or public sen·ices or facilities. In order to protect the
public interest a special usc may be appn.)\'ed. approved with modifications or denied."
Thi s request started a s an administrative application considered by the Community Development
Director but because written concems/objcctions were received durin g th e administrative noticing
period. it is being t<.m.varded to City Council tor a public hearing (Exhibit 2. con·es ondence receil·ed .
II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION/HISTORY
The property is zoned Res idential-One (R-1) and is almost entirely surrounded b y residential
neighborhoods . To the north and west are properties zoned Residential-Three (R-3 ). To the south is a
single-family neighborhood zoned Residenti a l-One C (R-1 C). Across Fenton are properties zoned
R-3. R-3A, and Commercial-One (C -I): these lots include the Wheat Ridg e Manor Nurs ing Home, a
gas station. and an auto re pair shop. To the s outhwes t acro s s W. 29111 A venue are properties outside
the boundary of the City of Wheat Ridge in the City of Edgewater.
The site contains Denver Water's Ashland Facility which includes two underground res ervoirs with a
combined s torage capacity o f 41 million gallons of water ( 19 million and 22 million, respectively).
T h e site has been home to a trea ted w a te r fa cility since the late 1800's. A series of upgrad e s ha v e
occurred over the last I 00 years. including the installation of a precast concrete rooting system in the
1970s. This roofing system exists today and covers a majority of the site.
SLP-13 -03 .·lslz/cmd Rewn·o ir 2
The elevation ofW. 30th Avenue is nearly 20 feet higher than W. 29th Avenue. Steep berms run along
the south and west property lines, and a retaining wall has been constructed along Fenton to
accommodate the topography of the site. A small well house is located on the south side of the
property. A chain link fence surrounds the entire property, and the primary vehicular access point is
from W. 30th Avenue.
The Ashland Facility is one of only a few reservoirs in the north end of the region. Ashland is
primarily fed by Denver Water's Moffat Treatment Plant at W. 20th Avenue and Quail Street. There is
no pump station on the subject property and the water is transported by gravity flow east to Denver.
The property is currently nonconfonning relative to structure setbacks, building coverage, landscaped
coverage and fencing with barbed wire along the top. A site plan showing the existing conditions is
included under Tab E AJ1Piication Binder-Tab E. Sheet 2 of 21, existin site /an).
Ill. CASE ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The applicant, Denver Water. is proposing to demolish the existing reservoirs and construct two
concrete water tanks that are 256 feet in diameter. Each tank will accommodate I 0 million gallons of
water; they will be 28-30 feet deep, but only one to two feet will be visible above ~:,rrade. The existing
facility is deteriorating and has reached the end of its useful life. In addition, the existing reservoirs
provide excessive storage capacity, which when combined with degradation has created water quality
concerns.
The replacement project is expected to begin construction in October 2012 and take approximately
three years to complete. In addition to replacing and downsizing the reservoirs. the redesign will
reduce the amount of impervious surface and address the aesthetics of the facility. The basins will
consume the northern two-thirds of the site and the southern portion will be landscaped to more
~:,rradually accommodate the change in elevation. A detention pond will be located at grade at the
intersection of W. 29th A venue and Fenton with a small pull-off parking area for maintenance visits.
An unmanned water quality facility is planned to be located on the northern portion of the site in
proximity to 30th A venue. The existing chain link fence is proy osed to be replaced with a more
decorative eight-foot high wrought-iron fence (Application Binder, Tab E. Sheet 3 o 21, ro osed site
'Jian .
Primary vehicular access to the water tanks will still come from W. 30th A venue, and a driving path
will encircle the two basins.
Following the replacement of the basins, Denver Water also seeks to up~:,rrade piping and drain lines
within surrounding rights-of-way, including Gray Street, Fenton Street, and W. 29th Avenue to
Sheridan.
Landscaping
Section 26-502 of the zoning code establishes landscape standards for nonresidential development.
The proposed site plan shows that roughly 55% of the site will be covered with live landscaping which
exceeds the 25% minimum coverage for non-residential construction. The site plan also meets the
requirement for numbers of trees and shrubs required. An eight-foot high wrought-iron fence will
S L:P-1 :!-O.L-Ishlancl Re.,en Dir 3
surround the property. It has been suggested that the fence be upgraded with brick columns; however,
Denver Water views this as a safety concern (Exhibit 3, Austin letter).
Well house/monitoring station
There is an existing well house/monitoring station on the southern side of the property. It is octagonal
in shape with a river rock foundation, brick construction with windows/glazing on each of the eight
facades and a red shingled roof. With 256 square feet of area, it appears to have been built sometime
in the early 20th century. This structure is proposed to be demolished as part of the project.
A new structure is proposed for the northern portion of the site. With 380 square feet of area, it is
denoted on sheet three of the site plan as a water quality building. The area of the structure includes
valve vaults which comprise a total of 870 square feet. This proposed structure facade can be viewed
on sheet II of the site plan package. It is proposed to be split-faced and smooth-faced concrete block
with a shed-style roof. High windows are proposed at the offset roofline facing east (Application
binder-Tab E. Sheet 11 of 21, building elevations).
Staff concludes that the proposed new structure is functionally designed with no interesting attributes.
Although it is a relatively small building in an unusual context (public utility structure), the monitoring
station is required to meet the standards of the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM). As
designed, it is inconsistent with the ASDM in the following areas: fa~ade articulation, materials used
and transparency/glazing. It is interesting to note that the existing well house with varied materials,
attractive design details, windows and historic appearance is in conformance with the ASDM. Staff
is recommending as a condition of the motion that the new structure be redesigned to emulate the
existing well house in shape and materials to provide a reference to the historical significance of the
property. An alternative would be to rebuild the existing structure somewhere else on the property,
even if it is not functional.
SUP-I 2-03/Ashland Reservoir 4
View of
well-house
from W. 301h
Avenue
Public improvements installation
Denver Water will be responsible for installation of new six-foot wide detached sidewalks and six-foot
tree lawns with street trees along both Fenton and 30th A venue. West 29th A venue currently veers
slightingly south as it approaches the Fenton Street intersection. A small portion of right-of-way will
be dedicated and the street reconstructed in this area to straighten it out which will include installation
of new curb. gutter and detached sidewalk with street trees planted at 35-foot intervals.
Timeframe for construction/ Hours of construction operation
Construction is expected to commence in October of 2012 and be finished in the summer of 2015.
Timeframes may shift slightly as the work probrresses A lication Binder -Tab D. Construction
Time/ine).
Hours of o peration are expected to be Monday-Friday from 7 AM to 5 PM. There are certain critical
milestones in the construction process which will require a variance from Section 26-623 (Excavation
and Deposit Control) of the zoning and development code relative to days and hours of construction.
The milestones are related to the concrete placements for the large tloor slab and roof deck for each
tank. Specific dates are not identified until further along in the construction process. Impacted
neighbors will be notified in advance of when these milestones will occur. It is expected that the pours
will take 14 consecutive hours each and it is anticipated that this will require work on the weekends.
Temporary employee parking
The majority of the employee parking will be off-site from the project location. One of the proposed
locations is the Sons of Italy Lodge located at 5925 W. 32nd A venue. The Lodge is a fratemal
organization which is located two blocks north of the construction site at the northeast comer of 32m1
and Gray Street. Most activities at the lodge, which has over 100 parking spaces, occur either at night
or on the weekends allowing ample room for daytime parking for the construction workers. There are
sidewalks along both Gray and Harlan Street providing safe pedestrian access to and from the site.
Three construction trailers are anticipated to be parked along the south side of West 30th A venue on
the northern end of the site. Only a few construction management personnel will be allowed to park
personal vehicles in this area. Adequate room will be available for two lanes of traffic and parking on
the north side of 30th Avenue (Application Binder -Tab G, 3(/' Avenue durin construction).
Hauling routes
There are several primary construction operations during the project which will impact adjacent
streets. Due to concern from impact on surrounding public streets, the haul operation routes have been
confined as much as possible to state highways: avoiding streets owned by Wheat Ridge. Edgewater
and Lakewood.
The tirst component of the construction process is removal of debris excavated during demolition.
The debris trucks will exit the site east via West 29th Avenue, tum right (south) on Sheridan, proceed
west on Colfax to K!IJ iing . north to 20th Avenue, and west to the Moffat YMCA Park site at Quail
(: 'Plication Binder -Tab G, Excavated Fill Haul Route).
Inbound trucks carrying fill back to the site will be coming south on Sheridan, turning right (west) on
29th A venue and proceeding to the project site. Empty vehicles leaving the site will travel east on 29th
A venue, tum south on Sheridan to Colfax where they will proceed west and tum north on Wadsworth
(Application Binder -Tab G, Imported Fill Haul Route .
The tina) haul routes will accommodate ready mixed concrete deliveries southbound on Sheridan to
either 29th A venue or 30th A venue. and upon delivery. will exit again to Sheridan. south to Col fax and
north on Wadsworth (Application Binder-Tab G. Ready Mix Haul Route).
SLIP-I ]-fi3; Ashland R t's(•n ·oir 5
The City will require traffic control where necessary and will evaluate the pre-construction street
conditions with post conditions for any damage occurring during the construction process.
IV. VARIANCE CRITERIA
The existing reservoir structure was originally built in the late 1890's and has been modified over the
years with the last major investment being the concrete rooting system installed in the 1970's. To
facilitate reconstruction with the proposed site plan, a number of variances are required as illustrated
in the following cha11.
R-1 Development Standards Required Proposed
Max. coverage bv buildings: 25% maximum 29.9%
Min. landscaped coverage: 20% 55.36%
Min. fence height 6' 8'
Min. front setback 30'-Fenton Street 25' -9"
Min. side setback: 15'-west side 50'-1"
30'-29 111 A venue side 276 '-4"
Min. rear setback: 30'-W. 30111 Avenue side 69'-11"
Residential Screening 6' high solid fence or All sides-8' high wrought iron fence
hedge or 15' wide v.:ith plantings and benning where feasible
landscaped area with
plantings
Construction hours of Monday-Friday Longer hours and weekend work at tour
operation 7 AM to 5 PM critical points in the construction process
to be detem1ined
Resulting variance requests: 4.9% building coverage
4'-3" front yard setback
2' high fence variance
Variance to residential screening
Variance to construction days and
hours
Description of variance requests
Building coverage
The property is zoned R-1 which is the largest lot single family zoning designation in the City of
Wheat Ridge. For single family development. the minimum lot size in the R-1 is 12.500 square feet
with lot coverage maximum of 25%. Quasi-public uses in R-1 are required to have a minimum lot
size of one acre and must also follow the 25% building coverage maximum. The Ashland property is
over eight acres so it seems reasonable that the increase in building coverage variance is proportionate
and will not be discemible. Even with a variance, the reduction of building coverage from current
conditions is 60%.
Front setback reduction
The minimum front yard setback in the R-1 zone district is 30 feet. The front setback on a property is
detem1ined by the public street from which access is gained. If a property is a comer lot. the 30-foot
setback is required from both street frontages. Because the Ashland property has three street
SLP-1 ::-03 Ash/am/ Re.1ermir 6
frontages, (29th, Fenton and 30th), the 30-foot setback is required on all three sides. The applicant is
requesting a setback variance from Fenton of 4 foot, 3 inches relative to the east tank location.
Fence height
The maximum fence height in the City's zone districts is six feet.. The existing fence is a six-foot
chain-link with barbed wire on the top, lending a prison-like appearance. The applicant is requesting
an eight-foot high fence for security purposes with upgraded fence materials (wrought iron). Staff is
recommending the brick or masonry columns be interspersed every I 00' similar to the fence around
the Moffat Treatment Plant at 20th and Oak. Denver Water views these columns as safety hazards.
Residential Screening
Detail of perimeter
fence at Moffatt
Water Treatment
plant at 20th/ Oak
Section 26-502 (Landscaping) of the zoning and development code requires residential buffering by
either a six-foot high solid fence or landscaped hedge or a 15-foot wide strip of landscaping with one
shrub or tree for every two linear feet. Adjacent residential development abuts the development site
on the south and western sides. Both of these residential areas are substantially lower with slopes
between the homes and the top ofthe subject property. While there is at least 15 feet of landscaping
adjacent to the residential neighbors, the slopes eliminate the option of tree and shrub installation. For
security purposes, a solid fence does not meet the standards for Denver Water properties. Staff
concludes that the change of grade provides adequate buffering for adjacent residential properties.
Staff recommends that additional plantings be shown on the western side of the access drive from W.
29th A venue.
Construction hours
Section 26-623 of the zoning and development code regulates excavation and deposit control
operations. One of the performance standards which fill operations must comply with are hours of
operation from 7 AM to 5 PM on weekdays. Operations are restricted from occurring on Saturdays,
Sundays and holidays.
SUP-12-03/Ash/and Reservoir 7
There are several times during the construction period when these hours need to be extended to
complete critical pours of the roof slabs and floor decks t()r each tank. This could include work after
hours and on weekends.
Variance criteria
In order to approve a variance, City Council must detennine that the majority of the criteria tor review
listed in Section 26-1 15.C .4 of the City Code have been met. Staff provides the following review and
analysis of the variance criteria (A J lication binder-Tab C. A 7 licant 's res'Jonses to variance
criteria).
1. The property in question would not ~·ield a reasonable return in use, service, or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed b~· regulation for the district in
which it is located.
The reservoir could either remain as a deteriorating structure or be rebuilt. The proposed
variances arc primarily due to the unusual nature of the structure being built and the site
characteristics. According to Denver Water, the reservoir is a critical component of water
service to the Denver metro area which may mean that there may not he viable alternatives
other than rebuilding the facility. The variances requested are based on the site configuration,
functionality and safety of the operation and construction requirements .
Staff finds that this criterion has been met.
2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locali~·.
The issues of variances on their own will not alter the character of the locality and may not he
discernible to the public eye. This is an area where most of the home construction occurred
from the 1920's through the 1950's. A cursory re\'iew of case history in the area since
incorporation indicates that there have been numerous \·ariances granted in the past including
front side and rear setback variances, fence height variances, lot area \·ariances and lot
coverage variances. There are also properties in the immediate area which arc noncontonning
relative to usc and parking.
Staff finds that this criterion has been met.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial im·estment in the proper~· with this application,
which would not be possible without the variance.
This project represents substantial capital investment in the property which may not be cost
effective or may require substantial redesign without the variances. Denver Water is the
primary water provider in the metropolitan area; uninterrupted water service is expected by the
citizenry and property owners. The proposed reconstruction will ensure continued provision of
this service.
Staff tinds this criterion has been met.
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific
proper~· invoh·ed results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as
SL P -1 :!-03 Ashlwul Re.,en·oir 8
distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were
carried out.
The property has three street frontages which require 30-foot setbacks on each side. There is
also a substantial grade change on the property with a 20-foot drop from the northwest comer
of the site to the southeast. There are unique conditions relating to the existing site
configuration and the quasi-public utility land use that supports the variance request.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having
an interest in the property.
All structures deteriorate through time. The existing structure has been in place since the early
1900's. While upbrrades and modifications have occurred on and off throughout the years, the
threat of structural failure, while not eminent, is a fact that cannot be ignored. Reconstruction
of the reservoir which is at the end of its useful life is being proactive rather than reactive.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
6. The granting of the variance '''ould not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the propert)' is located,
by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or
development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing
the danger of fire or endangering the public safet)', or substantially diminishing or
impairing propert)· values within the neighborhood.
Once completed the reservoir will benefit the public welfare and should be an improvement for
neighboring properties. It would not hinder or impair the development of adjacent properties.
The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of the construction.
Once constructed, the facility would not increase the congestion in the streets. The request will
most likely not have a negative effect on pro ert y values in the nei ghborhood. The aesthetics
of the property will be greatly improved (A plication Binder -Tab F. photo simulations).
Staff finds that this criterion has been met.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in
the neighborhood and are not unique to the propert)·.
The circumstances are unique to the property. When the use of the property for water storage
and maintenance purposes began in the 1890's, it was probably thought of as being in the
country side. Although subdivisions to the east were approved in the late 1890's and early 20111
century. residential areas to the south. north and west are more contemporary. having been
subdivided in the 1940's and '50's. As Wheat Ridge continued to suburbanize, the reservoir
became more entrenched in this primarily single family neighborhood.
Staff finds that this criterion has not been met.
SGP-1 ]-03, Ashland Rcserroir 9
8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with
disabilities.
Approval of the subject \·ariances would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person
with disabilities.
Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable.
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the
Architectural and Site Design Manual.
Many of the proposed improvements on the site are consistent with the goals identified in the
ASDM. Those would be increased pedestrian connectivity and upgraded landscaping.
However. the proposed monitoring station is unattractive. is inconsistent with several building
design standards and does not reflect the historical significance of the property.
Staff finds that this criterion has not been met.
IV. SPECIAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA
Before a special use application is approwd. the applicant shall show and the City Council shall find
that the majority ofthe proposed special usc criteria have been met. Staff provides the following
review and analysis of the SUP criteria (A J lication binder -Tab B. A 7 Jlicant ·s res 7onses to SUP
criteria).
1. The special use will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health. welfare,
safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood.
According to the applicant. reconstruction of the reservoir which is deteriorating is critical
fix the safety of area residents and the greater metropolitan area. Because of the advanced
age and excess capacity of the tanks. maintenance of good drinking water has pro\·ed to be a
challenge. Since Ashland is one of the only water reservoirs on the north side ofthc metro
area. the need for the reservoir is critical for the Denver Water service system.
The convenience of the neighborhood will be disrupted with the construction which will take
three years to complete. Howe\·cr. the public benefits of construction and the health, safety
and \Vel fare of the public outweigh the neighborhood inconvenience. Proper care must be
taken by the applicant during construction to minimize negative impacts operations.
Staffconcludes that this criterion has been met.
2. The special use will not create or contribute to blight in the neighborhood by virtue of
physical or operational characteristics.
The property is currently an eyesore due to its physical appearance and lack of
maintenance. Of the 8. 7 acres. almost 75% is covered with unattractive concrete. What
landscaping there is around the perimeter is comprised of"native grass" with unmaintaincd
bushes and sucker trees. A chainlink fence with barbed wire encompasses the site giving it
a "prisonlike" appearance. The proposed si te modifications will g reatl y increase the
aesthetics of the property (,1 'J lication Binder -Tab F. Photo simulations).
SLP-/.:-03 .-J.shlancl Re.\1 'ITuir 10
St{{{(concludes that this criterion has been met.
3. The special use will not create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing
zoning for the property.
The property is zoned R-1 which allows single family residential development on properties
with a minimum lot size of 12,500 square feet. Approximately 25 homes could be
accommodated on the site, which would require installation of an internal public street
system. A loose rule of thumb is that each residence generates I 0-12 trips per day. Given
these standards, roughly 250-300 additional trips will be generated each day by the single
family development.
During construction there will be impacts to the adjacent neighborhoods. Once construction
is completed, there will be little impact from the public utility use.
Sta.f(concludes that this criterion has been met.
4. The special use will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe
parking, loading, service of internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether
on or off the site.
Parking accommodations for most employees will occur off-site which will reduce impact to
the adjacent neighborhood streets. The approved haul routes focus primarily on state
highways outside of the Wheat Ridge City limit lines. Construction trailer siting will be
located on the northern portion of the site maintaining clear access on 30111 Avenue. Care
must be taken by the contractor to maintain fTee access on other adjacent streets.
The reservoir is a long-standing presence in the neighborhood and is generally a low traffic
generator. Once the facility reconstruction is completed. there will be very minimal traffic
generated by the site.
Sta.f(concludes that this criterion has been met.
5. The property is appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk,
buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the
character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent
properties.
Once completed, the property should have a positive impact on the neighborhood due to the
increase in landscaped coverage, plant materials and reduction in impervious surface. While
it is considered a public utility, which could be considered inconsistent with a residential
neighborhood, the landscape treatments, including berms, mitigate the visual impact.
Sta.f(concludes that this criterion has been met.
6. The special use will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks,
schools and other public facilities and services.
Sl./P-1 :7-03·A.Ihland Resen·oir 1 I
There will be impacts on the surrounding public streets during construction although the
applicant has tried to mitigate these impacts as much as possible. There will be no impact to
utilities. parks. schools or other public facilities and services.
St(~f/concludes that this critC'rion has hC'C'/1 mC't.
7. There is a history of compliance by the applicant and/or property owner with Code
requirements and prior conditions, if any, regarding the subject proper~·.
No history was found regarding code requirements or violation of prior conditions of
approval on the subject property.
Staffconcludes that this critC'rion has heC'n met.
8. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in
the Architectural and Site Design Manual.
Many of the proposed impro\'ements on the site are consistent with the goals identified in the
ASDM. Those would be increased pedestrian connectivity and upgraded landscaping.
However. the proposed monitoring station is unattractive. is inconsistent with several
building design standards and does not reflect the historical significance of the propert y .
Statl finds that this criterion ltas not been met.
\'. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
A meeting tor neighborhood input required by the SUP application w a s held on Februa r y 21.201 2. A
s umma ry of the m eetin g a nd attendance sheets are attached (Exhibit 4 and 5, neighborhood meet in
r eca and sign-1p h eels).
VI. AGENCY REFERRALS
Referrals were sent to impacted agencies with res pon ses below.
City of Edgewater: Commented on potential traffic impacts and interruption of water sen·e .
Applicant has met with Edgewater to discuss haul routes and roadway condition: documentation will
be required .
Xcel Energy: Owns and operates existing natural gas and electric distribution facilities in the project
area which must be accommodated.
Wheat Ridge Sanitation District: An existing sanitary sewer line on site mus t be abandoned . Piping
plan upgrades have been added to the plan.
Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District: Has requested advanced notice of any road closures du1ing
cons truction. An additional tire hydrant will be required at the northeast comer of Ingall s Street and
W . 29111 A venue.
S L'P-1 }-03 Ashlancl R e.l t'!To ir 12
Wheat Ridge Building Division: Has conversed with the contractor regarding the building pennit
review process.
Wheat Ridge Police: No concems.
\\'heat Ridge Public Works: Has reviewed drainage report and tratlic mitigation plans. Has worked
with applicant on the proposed IGA.
Contacted but not responding: AT&T Broadband, Wheat Ridge Water District, Qwest
Communications, COOT and Wheat Ridge Building Division.
VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concludes that there arc unique circumstances due to the quasi-public use and unusual site
characteristics. The fact that the property is entrenched in a low-density residential neighborhood
makes it particularly important that proposed traffic and construction impacts be mitigated. Staff
concludes that once the structure is completed, there will be very little traffic generated by the site and
there should be a substantial improvement in the aesthetics of the property.
Staff further concludes that the applicant has addressed as many of the negative impacts as possible.
For these reasons, staff is recommending approval ofboth the variances and the Special Use
Pem1it,with recommended conditions listed in the Council Action Fom1.
SCP-1 :!-03 Ashland Resermir 13
.. ~ ~ ~ _ ... City of • ~(?Wheat~dge ~OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Memorandum
Case No. SUP-12-3/Ashland Reservoir
Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner
August 8, 20I2
Comment letters received
The following are written comments received as a result of the administrative posting. Deadline
tor objection was Monday, August 6 at 5:00PM.
Carl Zarlengo, administrator of Wheat Ridge Manor Nursing Home-2920 Fenton Street
Date of contact: August 6 at 3 PM
Concerns: ease of access to the property located on the east side of Fenton Street-60 or so
residents with I 20 employees, need for 24-hour emergency response accessibility, potential
disruption of utility service, aesthetics/impacts of three year project, dust and noise from on-site
demolition
Applicant came in to discuss on August 6
Bud Starker
Date of contact: August 6: written comments received August 6 at 5:3 I PM
Area property owner at 30I 9 Eaton Street
Concerns: Would like to see perimeter fence upb>Taded to have brick pillars. Denver Water has
responded that this is a safety concem for people trying to climb it and providing "cover" for
vandals-Written rationale from applicant was provided to Mr. Starker. Also, whether the
southem access from W. 29th Avenue is confined with curb and gutter.
Mary White, board member of Largo Condo Association at 2890 Harlan Street (14 unit condo
in city of Edgewater)
Date of contact: July 17, August 7 (both via email)
Concerns: Wondered whether there will be impact on them. Also, potential gas line
replacement around 28th/Harlan
David and Dawn Kueter-5837 W. 29th Avenue (directly to the south of reservoir)
Date of contact: Undated letter dropped off to KJ-no date stamp. Also indicates it was
emailed. Was not taken in through Clerk's office
Concerns: As adjacent property owners, would like to see "hill" on south side of property left in
place during reconstruction; would like work hours limited to s~ecitic hours and no work on
weekends; would like to see routing of traffic down Gray to 26t 1 to reduce impacts on 29th; not
objecting to project but would like impacts minimized.
EXHIBIT 2
heatridge Manor Care Center
August 6, 2012
City Of Wheat Ridge
7500 West 29 1
h Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-8001
Case No. SUP-12-03, Approval for a Special Use Permit
RE: Denver Water Ashland Reservoir Replacement Project
recermg I r -~ -tz...
As requested in your letter dated July 27, 2012, as Administrator of Wheatridge Manor Care Center, I
would like to address some significant concerns and ask for clarifications with regard to the Ashland
Reservoir Project.
At Wheatridge Manor Care Center, our success depends on a multitude of variables, many of which will
be affected during this project.
*Ease of access to our property by Residents, Family, Friends, Employees and Potential Residents-The
core of our business revolves around providing service to 60+ elderly Residents, making it extremely
important that we have close-in handicap parking, as well as close and convenient Family and Visitor
parking available at all times. We have 120 employees who depend on the use of Fenton Street for
parking. For us to continually develop and grow our business there must be a certain level of
convenience for those shoppers who are considering putting their loved ones in Wheatridge Manor. We
must retain our ability to provide ease of access, and an inviting "First Impression". Congestion and
limiting of use on Fenton Street will directly impact our ability to generate new business. We must
continue to offer an appealing and easily accessible setting. How can we achieve this during the various
construction phases?
*The ability for 24-hour access for any and all Emergency Responders-Given the population we serve,
we must be guaranteed 24-hour access for any and all Emergency Responders without exception. On
any given day, we will have an ambulance visit 2 to 3 times. How can we be assured of uninterrupted
emergency access?
*Disruption of Services-During construction, any disruption of service affects 100+ people at a time. The
prospect of going any length of time without water or sewer services is unimaginable and there must be
back-u p plans in place for these situations. What are some options you can propose?
2920 Fenton Street • Wheat Ridge, 1 -3775 fax • www.wrmnh.com
*A pleasant living environment for our Residents-Along with the quality care we provide our Residents,
another appealing aspect of Wheatridge Manor is our quiet neighborhood setting. There is a calm that
people experience both within our building as well as throughout our exterior grounds. Construction is
bound to result in dust, noise, trash, debris, and large volume of truck traffic in the area. What can be
done to minimize these concerns?
*The projected duration for this project is approximately 3 years. Is there a time table available so we
can see what exactly the phases of the project will be to give us a better idea what times will be more
challenging to us than others.
One of the concerns addressed by the Denver Water Board was dealing with the aftermath of leaking
gasoline tanks on the south side of our property. A proposed solution is to build a "Grout Curtain". Could
you clarify what exactly that is and where it would be located and how construction would affect us?
Other proposed improvements that potentially can have an effect on us are
• Replacement of Filling Valve on 30th and Fenton
• Replacement of off-site transmission piping south on Fenton and east on 29th
• Construction of storm sewer improvements
It was mentioned that this project will require an off-site staging location for stockpiling and storage.
Has it been determined where this location might be? Will the haul routes have an impact on us?
Will there be on-site processing of demolished concrete? If so, what part of the site will it be located on?
How much dust and noise will be generated?
As the City Council is aware, Wheatridge Manor Care Center has been serving the Wheat Ridge
community since 1971 and has earned a reputation for quality care and services. An ongoing concern we
have faced throughout the years is that of adequate parking. With the entire west side of Fenton Street
being reconstructed and designed, we respectfully ask that improved parking for that side be
considered, in the form of indented diagonal parking spaces. This is a perfect opportunity for this to be
considered. Over the last 40 years of dedicated service, Wheatridge Manor has touched the lives of so
many in the community one way or another, and we will continue to do so for many years to come. We
are proud of our location and the contributions we have made to the community.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Respectfully,
{'1.-lt..~ ;) ,'l-t.-.G"') .. ~
Carl Zarlengo, NHA
Wheatridge Manor Care Center
Meredith Reckert
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Meredith,
William J. Starker <wstarker@starker.net>
Monday, August 06, 2012 5:31 PM
Meredith Reckert
Davis B. Reinhart
Ashland Reservoir SUP
I have two concerns with respect to the special use permit for Denver Water Department on the Ashland
Reservoir project:
1. We discussed during the early stages of this project the installation of brick piers in conjunction with the
installation of the 8' security fence around the perimeter of this facility, similar to the fence installation at
their Moffat treatment plant. I understand the security concerns outlined in their memo of 6/5/12 but feel
the brick piers could be designed so as not to have hand andjor foot holds. The installation of an 8' steel
bar security fence without some architectural detail is not in keeping with the residential character of the
neighborhood.
2. The south side of the property has an asphalt parking andjor staging area. From the design I remember for
this area, I do not recall the perimeter of this area being confined with concrete curb and gutter. I believe a
paved area of this nature should have perimeter concrete curb and gutter confinement to protect the edge
of the asphalt.
Thank you very much for your consideration of these comments. Please feel free to contact me if you have
any questions.
Sincerely yours,
William "Bud" Starker
Wheat Ridge City Council
District 1
(303) 598-9671
bstarker@ci. w heatrid~:e.co.us
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510-2521 and is legally
privileged. This message and any attachments hereto may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient(s). or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please immediately notify the sender and delete this email from your computer. The sender does not waive any privilege in the event this message was
inadvertently disseminated .
.!l Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
Meredith Reckert
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hi, Mary
Meredith Reckert
Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:00 AM
'Mary White'
RE: Question
I am not aware of any gas line improvements as part of the project; only the water line replacements in 29th Avenue and
Gray Street.
Meredith
Meredith Reckert, AICP
Senior Planner
Office Phone: 303-235-2848
=rh~ Bi9ge ~CoMMUHI1Y DEVEWtENT
From: Mary White [mailto:mwhite2090@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:39AM
To: Meredith Reckert
Subject: RE: Question
Thank you for the response. Are there any plans to replace gas lines around 28th and Harlan Street? Someone
mentioned this and I just wanted to get the facts straight. Thank you!
From: Meredith Reckert [mailto:mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 8:38AM
To: Mary White
Subject: RE: Question
Hi, Mary
Thanks for your inquiry. I wouldn't think that you condos would be impacted from a traffic standpoint. The major haul
route to move things in and out is limited to 29th and Sheridan. However, the project is expected to take three years. I
would think that in the early demolition stages there will be noise impacts and of course, the sound of trucks entering
and leaving the site.
WE are still in the process of reviewing the application for special use but it should be set for administrative noticing in
the next couple of weeks. Adjacent property owners are noticed and posting signs are put on the property for ten days
for input and comments. If we do not receive complaints, it can be approved administratively; if we received legitimate
complaints it will be set for City Council public hearing.
If you have any more questions, please let me know. The full application package is available for viewing in our
offices. If you'd like to come in, please let me know if advance so I can have the file ready.
Meredith
From: Mary White [mailto:mwhite2090@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 8:27 AM
To: Meredith Reckert
Subject: Question
Will this have any effect on 28th and Harlan Street? I am on the board for the Largo Condo Association located
at 2890 Harlan Street.
Thank you.
Southeast Water and
Drainage Projects
Ashland Reservoir
Denver Water is planning to replace
the existing large reservoir located at
the northwest corner of 29th A venue
and Fenton Street with two smaller
round water storage tanks. They are also
upgrading and replacing much of the
underground pipe system immediately
adjacent to the site.
Denver Water is required to process a
special use permit prior to commencement
of construction, which is expected to
begin this October and will last for three
years. A pre-application neighborhood
meeting was conducted in February, and
residents were given the opportunity to
discuss the project with Denver Water's
design team and City staff.
The application for special use is
expected to be filed later this month.
For more information, contact Senior
Planner Meredith Reckert, visit the City
website at www.wheatridge.co.us, or
visit the Denver Water website at www.
denverwater.org/ConstructionProjects/
Construction WorkAffectingCustomers/
Ashland/
2
VIA E-MAIL/ORIGINAL BY HAND DELIVERY
Ken Johnstone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 West 29 1h Avenue, 2nd Floor
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
David L. Kueter
Dawn L. Kral-Kueter
5837 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80214
303.433.0829
david@kralkueter.com
RE: CASE NO. SUP-12-03, SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR ASHLAND RESERVOIR
Dear Mr. Johnstone:
We live at 5837 West 29th Avenue in Wheat Ridge. The Ashland Reservoir site abuts our
back fence, and we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the request for approval ofSpecial Use
Permit in Case No. SUP-12-03.
Due to the limited timeframe for public comment, we have not yet had the opportunity to
review the application filed with the City of Wheat Ridge by Denver Water for the reconstruction
of the Ashland Reservoir water tanks. However, we have been in regular communication with
representatives of Denver Water, and have attended informational meetings regarding the project
conducted by Denver Water and by our representatives on City Council.
Since our property is immediately adjacent to the proposed site, it will come as no surprise
that we have concerns regarding the impact of the proposed reconstruction on our property and on
our day-to-day lives. These include concerns regarding noise, dust, truck traffic, and damage to our
property due to reconstruction operations.
Based on these meetings and conversations, we support the imposition of terms and
conditions minimizing the impact to neighboring properties, including:
I. Denver Water's proposal to leave the existing hill on the south side of the property
in place during reconstruction as a buffer to neighboring properties;
2. Limiting the work on the site to specific hours of the day, and restricting operations
on weekends; and
3. Routing truck traffic down Gray Street to 26 1h A venue to reduce traffic impacts on
29th A venue.
August 3, 2012
Page 2
In conclusion, based on the plans we have seen and our discussions with representatives from
Denver Water, we believe that the final reconstruction of the Ashland Reservoir water tanks and
associated reclamation of the overlying property will be a significant improvement, both to our
property, and to the City as a whole. We also understand that no project of this scale can occur
without some adverse impact to the surrounding area. We are relying on the City's review process
to help minimize those impacts to the extent possible.
Thank you again for the opportunity to provide comments. We would appreciate if you could
notify us of any future hearings which may be held on this application, and any additional
opportunities for public comment.
~~~
ct/tc~~~
Dawn L. Kral-Kueter
Meredith Reckert
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Meredith,
William J. Starker <wstarker@starker.net>
Monday, August 06, 2012 5:31 PM
Meredith Reckert
Davis B. Reinhart
Ashland Reservoir SUP
I have two concerns with respect to the special use permit for Denver Water Department on the Ashland
Reservoir project:
1. We discussed during the early stages of this project the installation of brick piers in conjunction with the
installation of the 8' security fence around the perimeter of this facility, similar to the fence installation at
their Moffat treatment plant. I understand the security concerns outlined in their memo of 6/5/12 but feel
the brick piers could be designed so as not to have hand and/or foot holds. The installation of an 8' steel
bar security fence without some architectural detail is not in keeping with the residential character of the
neighborhood.
2. The south side of the property has an asphalt parking and/or staging area. From the design I remember for
this area, I do not recall the perimeter of this area being confined with concrete curb and gutter. I believe a
paved area of this nature should have perimeter concrete curb and gutter confinement to protect the edge
of the asphalt.
Thank you very much for your consideration of these comments. Please feel free to contact me if you have
any questions.
Sincerely yours,
William "Bud" Starker
Wheat Ridge City Council
District 1
(303) 598-96 71
bstarker@ci.wheatridge.co.us
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. 18 U.S.C. Section 2510-2521 and is legally
privileged. This message and any attachments hereto may contain confrdential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient(s). or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended reciprent(s). you are
hereby notified that any dissemination. distribution or copying of this email message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error.
please immediately notify the sender and delete this email from your computer. The sender does not waive any privilege in the event this message was
inadvertently dissemrnated.
t;}; Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
DENVER \IVATER
e t-111 1 \ M l l:ll ;\''f't ...,,. • 0,.""' ,., (4•lo..-... ,, IIU :Z U~,_.I J
t•h""'l.r .H I lo-b •C.IUU • r .. , N n.. l()J .. C..!'0.·6 \'~~ -..d..-..... .., Of'1:,
TO: Whom it May Concern
FROM: Craig Austin, Manager of Safety & Security
DATE: June 5, 2012
SUBJECT: Perimeter Security -Ashland Reservoir
Dear Sir/Madame,
As you are aware, Denver Water (OW) is in the final design stages of the Ashland Reservoir facility,
which will be located at 2901 Fenton St When complete, this facility will consist of two (2) 1 0 Million
Gallon Potable Drinking Water Reservoirs and associated Water Quality Monitoring Station facilities .
The facility will support the service of drinking water to the approximately 1.2 million drinking water
customers in and around the City & County of Denver, and just as importantly, the facility will support
Critical services such as firefighting, health care (hospitals and clinics), and other dependent and
interdependent vital functions that would suffer negative impacts from a denial of water service from
this facility.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has identified the drinking water sector as one of 17
National Critical Infrastructure/Key Resources (CIIKRs). The decision to include the water sector is
based on the fact that the drinking water sector is vulnerable to a variety of potential attacks, including
contamination with deadly agents, and physical and cyber attacks. If these attacks were to occur, the
result could be large numbers of illnesses or casualties or denial of service that would also affect public
health and economic vitality.
Therefore, as we went about designing the facility we wanted to be sure to include security concepts and
features that provide the level of security commensurate with the importance of a facility of this nature.
In doing so we followed the guidance provided in the DHS National Infrastructure Protection Plan, the
DHS Water Sector Specific Plan, as well as industry-specific "Guidelines for the Physical Security at
Water Utilities". With regards to security vulnerabilities, we also had the benefit of learning from risk
assessments at many similar facilities to include those in OW's inventory.
With all that being said, we wanted to address your specific request to have "brick pillars" integrated
into the perimeter fencing for aesthetics purposes. While we agree that brick pillars do present an
aesthetically pleasing appearance, they do not fit in with any of the primary purposes of a perimeter
fence, especially as it applies to this type of facility. To the contrary, they would provide an attractive
and easy method for an adversary to compromise the perimeter by scaling the pillar(s) using the hand
and foot holds naturally provided in the structures. Additionally, they also provide areas (potentially 24)
that cannot be observed from the inner perimeter. As such an adversary or some number of adversaries
could use the area behind the pillars to provide cover of their activities or to hide or stage materials for
later use.
EXHIBIT 3
In 2004 OW installed new perimeter fence at two locations and included these structures in a portion of
those perimeters. Subsequently, we've had several independent security risk assessments conducted at
these facilities, and this aspect of the perimeter fence has been quickly and easily identified as a
vulnerability that an adversary would likely take advantage of. Further, although DW has subsequently
completed several new and/or existing fencing improvement projects we have not used this design
feature, nor do we intend to, based primarily on the clear vulnerability it presents.
In closing, we believe you will be equally pleased by the fence product included in the design. It is
marketed as presenting an aesthetically pleasing appearance that fits well even in a residential setting as
well as meeting the very important need of providing an effective security feature. As a neighbor we
appreciate your input and look forward to working with you as we complete the design and begin
construction. Please call or email if you have you have any questions.
~pectfully,
'_}~~
Craag Austin
Manager of Safety & Security
Denver Water
I"<' -~ . .. City of • -~Wheat&___dge ~OMMUNIIT DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'11 Ave. Wheat Ridge. CO !\0033-ROOI P: 303 .235.2!\46 F: 303.235.2!\57
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES
Date: February 21, 2012
City Staff Present: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner
Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works
Wade Hammond, Wheat Ridge Police Department
Kevin Annstrong, Wheat Ridge Police Department
Others present:
Location of meeting:
Property location:
Applicants :
Propert)' owners:
Property Owner(s) present?
Existing Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan
Designation:
Bud Starker, District I Council representative
Kelly Brooks, Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District
Sons of Italy Lodge
5925 W. 32 11 d Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Northwest comerof29th and Fenton (5801 W. 29th Avenue)
Denver Water
Same
Yes
Residential-One, R-1
Neighborhood
Members of the public present: See attached sib>n-up sheet
Applicant's Proposal:
The applicant Denver Water. is proposing to demolish the existing reservoirs and construct two concrete
water tanks that are 256 feet in diameter. Each tank will accommodate I 0 million gallons of water; they will
be 28-30 feet deep, but only 1-2 feet will be visible above grade. The existing facility is deteriorating and
has reached the end of its useful life. In addition, the existing reservoirs provide excessive storage capacity,
which combined with degradation has created water quality concems.
The replacement project is expected to begin construction in October 2012 and take approximately three (3)
years to complete. In addition to replacing and downsizing the reservoirs, the redesign will reduce the
amount of impervious surface. The basins will consume the northem two-thirds of the site and the southern
portion will be landscaped to more gradually accommodate the change in elevation. A detention pond will
be located at grade at the intersection of W. 29th A venue and Fenton. A parking area and unmanned water
quality facility are also planned to be located on theW. 29th Avenue frontage. The existing chain link fence
is proposed to be replaced with a more decorative 8-foot high wrought-iron fence.
EXHIBIT4
Vehicular access to the water tanks will still come from W. 30th Avenue, and a driving path will encircle the
two basins. The project team is evaluating the feasibility of providing a hydropower facility on site
somewhere along the north side ofthe property.
Following the replacement of the basins, Denver Water also seeks to upbrrade piping and drain lines within
surrounding rights-of-way, including West 29th Avenue and Gray Street.
Denver Water will be required to apply for a special use permit to allow reconstruction of the reservoir.
Existing Conditions:
The property is located on six (6) acres north ofW. 29th Avenue, west of Fenton Street, and south ofW. 30th
A venue. The parcel docs not have an assigned street address.
The property is zoned Residential-One (R-1) and is almost entirely surrounded by residential neighborhoods.
To the north and west are properties zoned Residential-Three (R-3 ). To the south is a single-family
neighborhood zoned Residential-One C (R-1 C). Across Fenton are properties zoned R-3, R-3A, and
Commercial-One (C -1 ); these lots include the Wheat Ridge Manor Nursing Home, a gas station, and an auto
repair shop. To the southwest across W. 29th Avenue are properties outside the boundary of the City of
Wheat Ridge in the City of Edgewater.
The site contains Denver Water's Ashland Facility which includes two (2) underbrround reservoirs with a
combined storage capacity of 41 million gallons of water ( 19 million and 22 mi Ilion, respectively). The site
has been home to a treated water facility since the late 1800's. A series of upbrrades have occurred over the
last I 00 years, including the installation of a precast concrete roofing system in the 1970s. This roofing
system exists today and covers much of the site.
The elevation ofW. 30th Avenue is nearly 20 feet higher than W. 29th Avenue. Steep benns run along the
south and west property lines, and a retaining wall has been constructed along Fenton to address the
topobrraphy of the site. A small well house is located on the south side of the property. A chain link fence
surrounds the entire property, and the primary vehicular access point is from W. 30th A venue.
The Ashland Facility is one of only a few reservoirs in the north end of the region. Ashland is primarily fed
by Denver Water's Moffat Treatment Plant at W. 20th Avenue and Quail Street. There is no pump station on
the subject property; the water is transported by b'Tavity flow east to Denver.
The following issues were discussed:
Will Denver Water be required to go through any city processes to allow for the reconstruction?
Yes, they 11'ill be required to app~r.for a Special Use Permit to allaH· a construction ofa public utility
structure H'ith major impacts. A Special Use Permit can be approved administrative~r: hoH·e,•er, it
H'ill mostlike~r require a public hearing infi'ont ofCity Council. The neighborhood meeting being
held this evening is the/irs/ step ofthe SUP process.
Will it be necessary to interrupt water service to the neighbors? Water sen·ice H'ill be
uninterrupted to the neighborhood. unless there is an accidentaiH·ater main break.
Where will parking occur for construction personnel? That is still being H'OI·ked out -they are
considering hm·e parking attire Moffat station at ::o'" and QuaiiH·ith shullles mnning back and.forth
to the site.
What will be the impact on the City's streets? All contractors H·orking on the project must be
licensed and bonded. Also, the City will enter into an/GA 11·ith Denver Water outlining construction
responsibilities. There will be pre and post-construction inspections to ensure the streets are brought
up to pre-construction conditions.
Will the project be phased? No.
Why is the capacity of the tanks being reduced from 40 million gallons down to 20 million
gallons? 20 million gallons ofcapaci(l' is all they need at Ashland due to improvements else1rhere in
the water delivel)' system. {/'the resen•oirs are o1•ersized and contain too much v.·ater there can be
resultant water quali(\' issues. There hm•e been no water quality issues at Ashland due to active
management by Denver Water to control the volume o,(water stored in the reservoirs.
What will be the hours of operation for construction activity? T_1picalzv. 7 AM through 5 PM
Monday through Friday. They may askfor exTended hours based on certain trigger points in the
construction process such as during large concrete pours .for the .floor and lid.
How will noise be mitigated? Most noise H'ill occur during the demolition period. The demo on the
first tank is expected to take about seven weeks. Once that is complete the 11·ork 11·ill take place below
grade in the "hole". Although Denver Water doesn't (\picalzr not{fi· the neighbors regarding 11·hen
the most noise will occur, there 11·ill be il!f'ormation on the construction schedule on Den1•er Water's
H·ebsite.
How will storm drainage from the site be addressed? During the construction process siltfences
and hay bales 11·ill be used to help control run-a,[( A ne11· detention pond is being constructed at the
southeast corner o,(the property to serve as permanent detention .for the site.
Will Denver Water maintain the landscaping? Yes. This should include trash pick-up o,(debris
caught in the.fence.
Will a security fence be built around the site similar to the Moffat facility? The plan is .for
erection o,(an 8' high HTought iron .fence. No brick pillars are being proposed.
Who will be inspecting the site construction? City o.f' Wheat Ridge public 1rorks' inspectors will be
pel:forming inspection in the rights-o,(·lray. The City may use contract inspectors.for inspections
required on private property.
What public improvements are expected to be installed? West 29th Avenue currentzv has a cun·e in
it and 11·ill be straightened out as part o,(the public improl'ements requirements. This will include
installation o,(curb, guller and side1ralk H'ith a tree lmm and new detached sidewalk. The existing
retaining wall along Fenton H'ill remain with ne11· detached walk and tree lawn will be installed. It is
possible that once the impro1·ements are constructed, the traffic signal at the 29th and Fenton
intersection may not be needed due to increased sight distance.
How will dust be controlled? Using construction industry best management practices such as water
spray.
How will the city of Wheat Ridge benefit from the construction? The improvements constructed
along 29th A1·enue 11·ill be a bene,fit. as will l'isual bene.fitsfi·omthe reduction o,(concrete and increase
in landscaped co1•erage. There will also be .fees required.for building permit review and usc tax on
materials.
3
ASHLAND RESERVOIR MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Please sign in to receive updates on the proposed project
-
Name E-Mail Address (optional)
,
) 1 j1 ff 3 83 D L~ ,d
.• ~J /_, Jot_'v·k·{_ .t~c._i? J~~&ap . Co~ 'f5bo33
.rco.:s rbv"ro~ j;.J. • l
5-/14-/\/ i3l2At-E-'-( BFL. "(OA:'i:JSoLVT1otv~x@ va.kv-tc, ~
~ m~~~~~ /y..-/./""~./. ~~ L?~P£ 1-b, .5 I . ~#!)/.?~
£ 1./e en JhoJ~ .3 ltJ'f /~_;~ fi-
r<R++t.~V"\~ Rh~~ hoL:s<? o~ v-~a...des-~)_~j'V"Itt , / ,Qflw\
~~.~5 t=~-\oV\ S+-81111'-f
l
L.._
~E.U...~~~~ ~ ~ {!;; V iA-fH A""'-? t-'E>l2?"S3> ~~f),WlZ.~\R:C.o~ 6--
_...$~h..~...).. ? \= '-'-'G ... -.. ~4-5 'EA -w,u S: ;-90Zl4-
i?tJp 0(A f2-~1<-W<;f ~ 1!3 Sf A f-~ ' /-( ET 3otq f.A(-o f.l.CST 8ozl4-
ASHLAND RESERVOIR MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012 -----------------------------------------------------------
Please sign in to receive updates on the proposed project
Name E-Mail Address (optional)
eudrm~ ern meR~ ;o1't0»1511-Ccr~ /?(15 tJ--.3 (S r:t\ ~ ttkzt4-CO 'i{ c)~ I j.-
'-"
9oN \?£/(b-P~ Ro AJ 'l?e ~ (fi} Ll?j(~odJJ> Of?.q b { (') 9 W~ cJ9 fit Jt{VE-
t,J.AJ£ 4IT/If'l;~ V ~Od/tf -
Ltt 11. 11 /..1 n; t.te I Lt.. LA1\l{)6 t1 t!Af@ ~as{. ;u-t
8~ ZhqaJ/1!3 ~~-
4Jiu~f-R:K/f£( ~c' ~)../~
. 3oo~ ~Pea~ Seat~&.~~ ~Q~~eao\. CAYv1 \.,v~ctl-~vi co aoCJ1'-1-
v ~C) _l. ~ u
-~--PH~L 1"'..5
i.3 I ~ ~ <: 0C.: S7-
) 1\.C'>'( S.L:SQ.::s ~<5@!e_:,tl1AIL L.t -"' ( ~lY2.J<(
ASHLAND RESERVOIR MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET
Meeting Date: February 21, 2012
Please sign in to receive updates on the proposed project
-
Name E-Mail Address (optional)
~t'AVI d ~u~fe.r
de.. v·d (2. k. '"-\ 'v-ut. +~, · C.o ""'-
~31 ~ 2..~-k... 4.J~ 8~21L(
bG...w·""-\(.r,...\ ·K..~e..ter
--
~ ~ #
-# ~ City of •
?WheatR.gge
ITEM NO: 5.
DATE: September 10, 2012
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 45-2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING
AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REGARDING DENVER
WATER'S ASHLAND RESERVOIR
0 PUBLIC HEARING
D BIDS/MOTIONS
(3J RESOLUTIONS
ISSUE:
0 ORDINANCES FOR I sT READING (mm/dd/yyyy)
0 ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (mm/dd/yyyy)
D YES
City Manager
Denver Water has plans to replace the Ashland Reservoir at 29111 Avenue and Fenton Street. An
intergovernmental a!,Tfeement is proposed to address the many issues ofthis impactful project.
The a!,Tfeement addresses the City's land use requirements, possible damage of the City streets,
right-of-way dedication and possible use by the City of a water line Denver Water will be taking
out of service.
PRIOR ACTION:
Denver Water made a presentation to City Council at the December 19, 2011 Study Session.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Permit fees and use taxes will be collected.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Denver has maintained water storage reservoirs at the Ashland site since the 1890s.
The current reservoirs leak and the roof sections have developed cracks. The existing 41-million
gallon reservoirs will be replaced with two 10-million gallon concrete tanks. The reservoir
replacement project is expected to take approximately three years and require more than 20,000
heavy dump truck trips over City streets.
V: Forms CAFtemplate
Council Action Form
September 10, 2012
Page 2 .
An intergovemmental agreement has been negotiated to insure that Denver Water repairs any
damage to the streets resulting from the project. The agreement also requires that Denver Water
apply for a Special Use Pem1it and Building Pennit, pay applicable use taxes and dedicate right-
of-way along 29th A venue.
Denver Water has two delivery water mains on 29th A venue, east of the Ashland Reservoir.
Recent analysis has detennined that only one pipeline is needed to serve customers and a 42-inch
main will be taken out of service early next year. City Staff has detennined that the soon-to-be-
abandoned Denver Water line can be converted to a City storm sewer and incorporated into the
current project being designed to address some of the drainage issues in the south-east part of the
City. The agreement allows the City to acquire the pipeline, without cost, upon inspection in
February, 2013.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approving the intergovemmental agreement with the City and County
of Denver regarding the Ashland Reservoir replacement project.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
1 move to approve Resolution No. 45-2012, a resolution approving an intcrgovemmental
agreement with the City and County of Denver regarding Denver Water's Ashland Reservoir."
Or:
"I move to table indefinitely Resolution No. 45-2012, a resolution approving an
intergovemmental agreement with the City and County of Denver regarding Denver Water's
Ashland Reservoir tor the following reason(s)
REPORT PREPARED BY;
Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Resolution No. 45-2012
2. Denver Water IGA
TITLE:
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
RESOLUTION N0.45
Series of 2012
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVENMENTAL
AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER
REGARDING DENVER WATER'S ASHLAND RESERVOIR
WHEREAS, Denver Water owns and operates its Ashland Reservoir in the City
of Wheat Ridge; and
WHEREAS, Denver Water is in the process of replacing and improving its
Ashland Reservoir facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City has ordinances and processes that require Denver Water to
undertake certain obligations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Wheat Ridge City Council, that:
Section 1. Agreement Approved.
The Intergovernmental Agreement with the City and County of Denver Regarding
Denver Water's Ashland Reservoir is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk
are authorized and directed to execute the same.
Section 2. Effective Date
This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
DONE AND RESOLVED this __ day of _____ , 2012.
Jerry DiTullio, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janelle Shaver, City Clerk
Attachment 1
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
REGARDING DENVER WATER'S ASHLAND RESERVOIR
THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ("Ah>reement"), dated this day
of August, 2012, is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE,
STATE OF COLORADO, a home rule municipality of the State of Colorado (the "City"), and
the CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting by and through its Board of Water
Commissioners ("Denver Water") a home rule municipality of the State of Colorado.
RECITALS
1. Denver Water owns and operates its Ashland Reservoir in the City of Wheat
Ridge, Colorado.
2. Denver Water is in the process of replacing and improving its Ashland Reservoir
facilities as described generally below (the "Project").
3. Denver Water may modify its water distribution pipe system and stonnwater
drainage system in conjunction with the Project.
4. The City's ordinances and processes require that Denver Water undertake certain
obligations as part of the Project.
5. The Parties would like to set forth their understanding of these requirements.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth
herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows.
I. The Parties ah>ree that the Project is generally described and intended as follows.
a. The Project will reduce Denver Water's storage capacity at the Ashland
Reservoir site from 42 million gallons in two reservoirs to 20 million gallons in two
underground tanks. The Project's replacement of the existing storage reservoirs will
result in long-term improvements to Denver Water's water quality and on-site facilities.
b. The Project may result in damage to City streets. Prior to commencement
ofthe Project, and upon completion ofthe Project, Denver Water shall have an
independent engineering firm, approved by the City, perform a pavement condition
analysis, with the fonn of analysis approved by the City, on City streets that are along the
Project's truck haul routes and work areas. Denver Water will repair the subject streets,
as determined by this pavement condition analysis, to their pre-Project condition. The
required street repairs shall be made within six (6) months ofthe completion ofthe
Project. Denver Water will repair any structural damage and perfonn any major
maintenance of the subject streets that may be necessary during the construction of the
Project.
c. The Project will provide an approximately 24-foot strip of Denver Water
property along the West 29th A venue frontage tor public right-of-way in order to achieve
the City's desired 61-foot right-of-way so that the City can straighten West 29th A venue.
Attachment 2
1. The City will provide technical assistance as requested to Denver
Water concerning design of the widening of West 29th A venue
adjacent to the Ashland Reservoir site.
II. Denver Water shall include the construction of the improvements
described above in its construction contract for the Project.
111. The City shall be responsible for the desih:rn and construction of
any additional improvements to West 29th Avenue south ofthc
existing centerline of West 29th Avenue or on West 29th Avenue
east of Fenton Street and west of Gray Street. The City shall be
responsible for any traffic signal modifications at the intersection
of W. 29th A venue and Fen ton Street.
IV. Denver Water shall convey the right-of-way by quit-claim deed.
2. Denver Water may stage three (3) construction trailers along the south side of 30th
A venue in the City right-of-way immediately east of Harlan Street. The trailers
shall be placed entirely south of the south curb of the street with the trailer side
doors facing south towards the Project site.
3. The Parties further agree to the following Project-related items.
a. Denver Water has sent out an initial notice to neighbors of the Ashland
site infonning them ofthe Project. An introductory presentation has also been made at a
study session ofthe City Council. More information and photo simulations are available
for viewing on Denver Water's website.
b. Denver Water and its construction manager will continue to provide public
relations efforts including setting up viewing areas around the perimeter of the site during
large concrete placement events.
c. Denver Water has been in contact with the homeowner at 5831 West 29th
Avenue adjacent to the site's construction entrance regarding special provisions
necessary to maintain access to and protect their property during construction.
d. Denver Water is taking its 42" Conduit No. 23 in West 29th Avenue from
Fenton Street to Sheridan Boulevard pennanently out of service during February. 2013.
The City will examine the pipeline condition, when Denver Water makes such
investigation possible, to detennine possible use of the pipeline for a storm sewer.
Denver Water shall grant by quitclaim the pipeline to the City at no cost to the City. if the
City makes such a request. Any such conveyance shall be in an as-is condition and shall
release Denver Water from any further liability for such facilities.
e. Denver Water or its contractor shall develop a materials management plan
for review by CDPHE as necessary for handling of petroleum contaminated soil and
groundwater east of the site.
f. Denver Water or its contractor will identify potential sites for off-site
storage and staging.
g. Denver Water shall invite City personnel to attend the regularly scheduled
construction progress meetings on site. The parties expect that these meetings will occur
2
weekly at the beginning of the Project and become less frequent toward the end of the
Project.
h. The Parties abrree that Denver Water will participate in an upcoming City of
Wheat Ridge pennitting process.
i. Denver Water will apply for a Special Use Permit (for use of the property
for water storage tanks and for the Project's volume of excavation and haul).
Accordingly, Denver Water will comply with the City's Special Use Permit application
processes.
J. Denver Water or its contractor will obtain a Building Permit for the
Project.
k. Denver Water or its contractor will pay the City's established use tax.
I. Denver Water or its contractor will obtain all City permits for work
perfonned in the City street rights-of-way.
m. Denver Water and its contractor will comply with all appropriate
perfonnance standards, perfonnance bond and insurance requirements.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
I. Authorized Representatives. The City designates Steve Nguyen as the City
Representative under this Agreement. Denver Water designates Martin Garcia as Denver
Water's Representative under this Agreement. Each party shall be notified of any change by the
other in its authorized representatives.
2. Release and Indemnification. Each party agrees to the extent pennitted by law
and subject to all immunities. defenses and other protections aflorded it pursuant to the Colorado
Governmental Immunity Act, Section 24-10-1 OJ, et seq, C.R.S. to indemnify and hold hannless
the other party and its employees from and against any and all claims from third parties for
damages, loss, injuries, liabilities and expenses for personal injury or property damage, including
reasonable attorney's fees, relating to or arising out of any act of omission of the indemnifying
party or its agents or employees with respect to the implementation of this Agreement.
3. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights and duties ofthe
parties hereunder shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado.
Venue for any and all legal actions arising hereunder shall lie in the District Court in and for the
City and County of Denver, State of Colorado.
4. Non-Appropriation. The payments of either party's obligations in fiscal years
subsequent to the current year are contingent upon funds for this Agreement being appropriated
and budgeted. If funds for this Abrreement are not appropriated and budgeted in any subsequent
year, this Agreement shall terminate. As of the date of execution of this Agreement, it is the
intent and expectation of the parties to budget and appropriate the funds required for its full and
complete perfonnance.
5. Notices. Any notice or communication given pursuant to this Abrreement shall be
given in writing, either in person or by certified maiL return receipt requested. If given in
person, notice shall be deemed given when actually given. If given by certified maiL notice shall
be deemed given at the time indicated in the duly completed return receipt.
3
Notice to Denver Water shall be delivered or mailed to:
Denver Water Engineering
Attn: Martin Garcia
1600 WIth Avenue
Denver, CO 80204-3412
Notice to the City shall be delivered or mailed to:
Steve Nguyen
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 West 291h Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
6. Signing Authority. The parties hereby stipulate and represent that all procedures
necessary to authorize the execution of this Agreement have been performed and that the persons
signing for each of the pm1ies have been authorized to do so.
7. Counterparts. This Ab,'Teement may be executed in several counterparts. each of
which shall be deemed an original. and all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Intergovernmental
Agreement.
ATTEST:
Janelle Shaver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney
{SEAL)
ATTESTED AND APPROVED:
By:
Robert J. Mahoney, Director of Engineering
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Legal Division
{SEAL}
5
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
By:
Jerry DiTullio, Mayor
Date:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,
acting by and through its BOARD OF
WATER COMMISSIONERS
By:
James Lochhead, CEO/ Manager
Date:
REGISTERED AND COUNTERSIGNED
By:
Auditor