The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/07/2002AGENDA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY August 7, 2002 Notfce is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority on August 7, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., in the second floor conference room of the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 1. Call the Meeting to Order 2. Roll Call of Members 3. Election of Vice Chair 4. Approval of Minutes - July 10, 2002 5. Public Forum (3'his is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.) 6. Executive Session under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b) and (e) for a conference with the Authority for the purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legai questions and, further, for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators related to land use and/or acquisition of property in the Wadsworth Redevelopment Area. New Business A. Public Hearing - Amendment to 2002 Budget B. Extension of contract with Syzmanski/Ray 8. Old Business A. Land Use Case - King Soopers Fueling Facility 5pecial Use Permit 9. Other Matters 10. Adjournment MINUTES OF WHEAT RIDGE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY July 10, 2002 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority meeting was called to arder by Chair Sandra Collins at 7:10 p.m. The meering was held in the second floor conference room of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commissioners present: Tom Mallinson Sandra Collins Vance Edwazds Elwyn Kiplinger Kandi McKay Commissioners absent Norm Burkpile John Hall Janet Leo Mazgy Platter Also attending: J'vn Windholz, Urban Renewal Attomey Alan White, WRURA Executive Director Arne Ray, Szymanski/Ray Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary 3. ELECTION OF VICE-CIIAIR Kandi McKay was elected as Vice Chair of the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the regulaz meeting of June 24, 2002 were presented for consideration. It was moved by Vance Edwards and seconded by Kandi McKay to approve the minutes as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 5. PUBLIC FORUM There was no one present to speak before the Authority. WRLJRA Minutes 07-10-02 Page 1 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Board Membership Matters - It was moved by Vance Edwards and seconded by Kandi McKay to move this item from No. 7 on the agenda to be heard before adjourning to executive session. The motion passed unanimously. It was necessazy for Jim Goddard to resign from the Authority due to the fact that, although he owns property in Wheat Ridge, his place of residence is no longer in the city. There was discussion regazding whether or not to approach City Council about changing residency requirements for members of WRURA. There was a consensus not to pursue any changes in residency requirements unless it becomes difficult to fill vacancies on the Authority in the future. There was also discussion regazding regulaz attendance at WRI7RA meetings. All members will be encouraged to attend on a regular basis. 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION It was moved by Vance Edwards and seconded by Elwyn Kiplinger to adjourn to executive session under CRS Section 24-6-402(4)(b) and (e) for a conference with the Authority for the purpose of receiv►ng legal advice on specific legal questions and, further, for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations and/or instructing negotiators. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned to executive session at 725 p.m. Those present for the executive session were: Tom Mallinson, Sandra Collins, Vance Edwazds, Elwyn Kiplinger, Kandi McKay, Alan White, Jnn Windholz, Arne Ray, Ann Lazzeri The executive session was adjourned to the regulaz meeting at 8:46 p.m. 8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to come before the Authority. 9. OTHER MATTERS A. Date of Next WRURA Meeting was set for Wednesday, August 7 at 7:00 p.m. ~ WRi.7RA Minutes Page 2 07-10-02 10. ADJOiTRNMENT It was moved by Vance Edwards and seconded by Kandi McKay to adjourn the meeting at 8:49 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Sandra Collins, Chair Ann Lazzeri, Secretary WRURA Minutes Page 3 07-10-02 Ciry of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum TO: Urban Renewal Authority Board Members FROM: Alan White, Planning and Development Director w SUBJECT: Amended 2002 Budget DATE: August 1, 2002 4&E Attache d is a Resolution approving a supplemental budget and appropriation for the Urban Renewal Authority for 2002. The supplemental budget and appropriation is necessary due the cost of consultants we have hired to perform certain work and to budget as a revenue source the reimbursement from the City for the Town Center fountain. Attached are the latest revenue and expenditure financials far the Authority. The professional services account has been increased to $220,000. We have already incurred $102,000 in expenditures so far this yeaz. According to the latest financial report there is a deficit of about $77,000.00 in this account. Other majar changes are: 1. Sales tax increment revenue is shown at $140,000. When Council passed the ordinance reorganizing the Authority, all previous agreements were superceded. This would include the agreement with the City that capped the Authority's sales tuc revenue from the Safeway MazketPlace project at $100,000. The increment has been about $150,000 the last four yeazs. Because receipts are down citywide, a slightly lesser amount is shown in the revised budget. 2. Previous agreements with the City included reimbursement for staff time, office space, and use of fumiture and equipment. This amount in the past was set at $5,000. A more realistic number is $25,000 to cover staff time. 3. The budget for professional services has been doubled from the expenditures so faz this yeaz. This will cover the extended contract of Syzmanski/Ray, other consultants used for acquisition negotiation and financial matters, and continued legal consultation. 4. $200,000 has been included for potential public improvements in connec6on with any project. 5. This revised budget projects a fund balance of $16,521 far the end of the year. This likely will be higher because not all accounts will be entirely spent, but not significanfly higher. Proper notice has been given for this public hearing. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 02. CADocumencs aud Se[tiugsWauVvly Dacumevcs\WPfiles\URA\2002 budget ameud memo.wpd Exhibit 1 URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY FUND 37 ACTUAL 2001 BUDGET 2002 REV. 2002 , BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $525,322 $159,478 $159,478 Revenues 37-500-00-501 Property Tax Increment $256,450 $250,000 $250,000 _ 37-500-00-504 Sales Tax Increment . $100,000 $100,000 '140'ODO,`' 37-580-00-581 Interest 18 103 8 000 $5,000 City Reimbursement 120 979 TOTAL REVENUE $899,875 $517,478 $515,979 Personnel 37-120-600-602 Salaries $0 $0 $0 37-120-600-625 FICA $0 LO LO Total Personnel $0 $0 $0 Supplies 37-120-650-651 Office Supplies $40 $200 $200 37-120-650-654 Printing & Photocopying $976 $2,000 $2,000 37-120-650-655 Postage $0 600 600 Total Supplies $1,016 $2,800 $2,800 Services 37-120-700-702 Conference & Meetings $392 $1,000 $1,000 37-120-700-706 Dues, Books, Sub $3,406 $3,200 $3,200 37-120-700-740 Mileage $0 $300 „ ,$300 37-120-700-750 Professional Services $220,130 $25,000 $Z20,000 ! 37-120-700-758 City Reimbursement $5,230 $25,000 $25,000 37-120•700-799 Misc. 167 200 200 TotalServices $229,325 $54,700 $249,700 Capital 37-120-800-801 Acquisition & Relocate $0 $0 $0 37-120-800-872 Site Improvements $0 $1,7,500 $200. 000' Loan Payments $0 $0 $0 37-120-800-872 PTI - Marketplace $230,056 $44,000 $50,000 Transfer to City $280,000 $0 _$0„ 37-120-800-899 Unallocated 0 100 000 ~ 30.'000 ; Total Capital $510,056 $161,500 $280,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $740,397 $219,000 $532,500 ENDING FUND BALANCE $159,478 $298,478 ~ URA 2002 Budget WHEAT RIDGE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 02 Series of 2002 TITLE: A RESOLUTION ENACTING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET AND APPROPRIATION FOR THE YEAR 2002. WFIEREAS, C.R.S. 29-1-103 (1) of the "Local Government Budget Law of Colorado"requues certain local governmental entities to prepaze and adopt an annual budget; and WHEREAS, the Attorney for the Authority has opined, by memorandum dated August 29, 2001, that the provisions of the Budget Law do apply to the authoriry; and WIIEREAS, C.R.S. 29-1-109 enables the Authoriry to make changes to an adopted budget upon approval of a resolution complying with the notice provisions of C.R.S. 29-1-106; and WHEREAS, notice of adoption of this supplemental budget and appropriation was given by the Urban Renewal Authoriry in compliance with C.R.S. 29-1-106; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the provisions of the Budget Law regarding notice, objections, and heazing, a public hearing was held on this Supplemental Budget and Appropriation for 2002 by tlie Authority on August 7, 2002. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority as follows: Sectioo 1. A supplemental budget and appropriation of the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority 2002 Budget is hereby approved. The purpose of the supplemental budget is to transfer funds from the unallocated funds account and fund balance to the professional services account in ozder to reimburse consultants for work performed for the Authority, to include as a revenue source the reimbursement of funds from the City, and to make available funds for public improvements in connection with.any potential urban renewal project. Section 2. The moneys aze being transferred from the fund balance and unallocated funds account. The sources of the fund balance and unallocated account aze property and sales tax incremental revenues generated.in the urban renewal azea, the interest on checking and Colotrust accounts, and reimbursement from the City of Wheat Ridge. Secfion 3. A certified copy of this resolution shall be filed with the Division of Local Government. ADOP1'ED the day of , 2002. WHEAT RIDGE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY Chairperson ATTEST: Secretazy to the Authority C:ADocumeuts and SetUngsWanVvly Documents\WPFiles\[7RA=02 sup budget res.wpd ~ m a n rn x m N am c C ~ m d f ~ C W a a N ~ a 6 0 W W O 49 K F n. r C i- z ¢w W M1 2 x 2 W ~ E LL • 6 ~ N > (V O T OI- F 1- O £ w ~y N V U C ~ p O pl M W ~a m I N O M F O W 2 ~ M ~ N o rn ~ n D ~ ~ T n J oa W 01 e m..: vxa= ~rvRF 5:~: ~R ..~R~ 'v'P 3 "A3~.R R.R$ ee: - - ~ ' 1 ~ _ I J I~ l F b~ i n I 066000 IC ON04 1ttl1 ~C}C dlOd~+0~6j.{j 000U I l ~ OOOOOOIOY GVOO IV ~'lo~no}ooqnyirs~ooiftoga ~uii iiye ~ w I - I 1 000 l05 1'IP64fo ~P41 'SOOI IWi 0 . 1 I' I N WO 16 k P. I'! ~l a I V I Yi o. ~ U3 t n u . 1 1 1 1- f ' 1 I i • 11 i 1 I i t N/ W IA 1 C1 ~ » O . 1~ t C 11 ' i I i ~ 5 h N 1 Vi 1 I 1 ~ N - . 1 ~ i I 1 1 I I~ 1 . Y . 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t I t f f 1 I 1 II 1 000000101 ONOO INS V000000091OlOO+000 1~+t hll 1 000000 1 O 1 OCOO 1 Y{ .a1'JGInQO00M I Ni I OONO00 I 1p 1 N tl r• , • ~ • ~ l l O P O I h l N~+ O h O l~ I P l d 0 IO I C' 0 1 I 1 000 101 MPONO Iril m0 10~ +11 - 1 1 t t{I aG d 1 a 1 P MG O I Y 1 O 1 N 1 1~ Y ~ { 1 1• 1 1.! 1.! - II I 1 1 t W t Qi lp i O I N O I N 1 < Y n 1 o 1.. 1 m a i i I " 1 1 t 1 f 1 1 1 G I O O b O O O 1 O 1 O O O O 1 O 1 O O O O O O O O O 1 O I O O O O O O I O{ O 11 I o 0 0 o O O 1 0~ o 0 0 0 1 O 1 o O O O O O O O O 1 O 1 O O O O O O 1 O I O I~ I . . . . . . 1 . ! . . . . 1 . 1 . . . . . . . . 1 I . . . . . 1 . 1 . II I 1 1 ~ 1 1 t 1 t ' 0 i I I 1 1 I I f 1 P . 1 1 ~ I I 1 1 tl 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I i o n rn n a w o 0 0 O 6 T M O1 M 1~ V f I ~ 1 1 I 1 I N oooaoo~o~ amoo ~m~ ooooooooa~a~ooaooo ~ci ree O O O O O O I O I O N O O 1 Ill ! QI M O N O O O O N ~ M 1 O O d O O O 1 tl' 1 C N • ••.••I •1 • I • I 1• I I 11 N ttlt h~+ h N P 1~1 M N I I P 1 P l O P N P 1~ 1 i a0 II 1 1 1' + f lN 0 ~ I I A 1 P 1 N 0 i i n .i e i i oi n in i w .t 1 1 I i o ~ o i < 1 a 1 M u t i i ~ fl O O O O O O 1 O 1 C N O O 1 W t O O O N O O O O O I UI 1 O 6 O O O O I O 1 Pf 00000010/ OMIOO IYI~ OOOhO00001h1000000 101 +11 . . . . . 1 . 1 . • ~ . ! . . . . { . I . . . . ~ . 1 . 11 1 1 N . t Qf t N V tO 1 ~ [ P Y ~ p i ~ i 1 1 . I i ~ 1 ~ M i M < 1 . 1 f 1 1 1` 1 I 1 . II ' I I ! 1 N 1 0.1 1 1 1 N Y 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 II . I I 1 1 . I 1 I 1 l ~ 1 4 I 1 I ! 11 0oooooiot oooo io ~ ooaoooooo~oiooaooo ~o~ o n ooooqo~o~ 9999 1 oaooooo~a~oaoooo ~o~ on . . . - i . t 91 . . . . . . r . ~ . . . . ~ . ~ . g . ~ ~ o0o iat ooooooioi oc ioi on - i i ° °O i° i ° ° i° i ° o ° ° ° ° i ° i °u wo a m oo ~ u r n ~r m o i n n 1 1 t. 1 1• I I- 1 • n 1 t N INI ~M i~N tVi ~O 1.+1 PY I 1 1 1 N N 1 h 1 0 O ~ b I + N ' 1 1 1 ! 1 ~ 1 ti 1 N tl J I i I 1 1 ~ 1 ~ LL C W NJC'W C ~+W(96 WF-W Z IY F~JJ 1- WfLWV6¢ Z ZJ 6WW <F 60GtM1 ~ V 6 d~ ~ 3WD t0 Z W 6OO6 W 62 Z K7U a V 32J6'ILI Jw2w r+VCr~F 6fS elaS WGZ 6.7 Z CF-¢W FN£>ZW£~+LS \ ~FZ~ Z SlLmZZ 2J~+ Wd!'+SWW W •W66~LL 3 W20O W~+6J 4f~81W£YI-Odf fOKIpU LL O tA~ fL ~ WC 6 £WKi1lItlWZ6 07¢O R RI 1- WW FK -4.W6 W6WWN 2V-2J~W J ~2WFKW J F~ d -IU...IKac£GtU ~12i 6 W KZIDZ06 S.YNO W[l6:UW6 V 02W6WF f 60ZWLL W 6❑ fY WYCZtl r~1[.t+ W JfLf2t90 fA O ~ Y O 6 W LL V 2 6 G J~ ry Z O~ R 6 6 ~ W 1 O O Z K NWxbKK f OW- F- WOp.OWOWfOW i- Oi 11-F- f- h 1WJ66 O WVUI- O 2£NKS GN O Wr5 ' p t0 F ti • 6V F Y066 f W~ W 6KZ F ~V t)NN 1- 6 1+.66£~+7 F1-K LLNGLL>WIYJU O~+a¢22 O W 6£ V W O F O LL O N W D Z 41 6 o F J 2 LL N O 2 LL£ 6¢¢ O 2 " i FW'+ZW« O LLS06 O 6LLWCCC O ~ 3 WI-LLD£V d OM16Q U VC6LLV1-DK£ JGq4lf1- W LL NN01'1VI-+ -ONO NdOOmPd.~U .~NNP~1~ . O-[tiNfY< VJNVI~ 00<NUII(IhPPOOi~PSP OdOONO +0000 h1~nl~Rl~hhA t00Y1W03W 1 1 1 1( 1 l ~ 1 I 1 F 1 1 F 1 1 1 I. I t I i ~ 1 aaoooo oooa 000o0o000 ooaooo ooooao uainvrin o0oooooao ooaaso OONGOd ddd41 hhhhhl~nAh~ . WwSUt9Na0 ' 1 l! Ii 1 1111 1 I 1 t t f 1 1 1 1 f i ~ t 1 0...00 O o 0 o O o O O q O O O o O o O€so O NItlNNiVN WNNN NN41iNwlVNNtV NN0.1ftINN 1 1(' I[ I 1 1 I t I i i i i 1 1 f I 1[ f 1! 1 rNhl~nh nnnn rrnrnnnnn i~l~.hhl+l~ M11t'lFlt9M MMFI('1 MMMf419MMt¢1'1 MRMM#IM . CI M ~ J 1 CI LI YI 1 01 C 1 'c UI U' 6 I . ~ WWW WW y ~ . , ' M V V V V 1 O ''i . . ~ [ 1 1 1 I ~ 1 D P. ' - - ~ f0 W W O O { P V O - 000 00 1 O 1 W . - 1 1 I 1 1 . 1 C 090 00 13 cO . 000 00 1 c+ N 1 1 I I I tA N IR N UI ~ m ~ N 0 A t O t . f N I N 1 i . m ~ ~ a I t m 1 - 9 1 O 1 A 1 -I ~ ~ 1 W 1 V I O -1 y T 3~ y fO 3J £ 1 O 0 o c«z o am x1 m z m-1 -i r a m im a a onm a mr ain ~ r r m m 1- °1 s ~ . mr - v i , 9 1" N -1 -I A A 1 9 C -1 rD-i 9 DC wtf 2 S D Z x x 9 O 1 n ' o w zmm m m cr+o a noa N A mI 3 ~ . . ~ w mcz + V .li m2 < -1 1 . ~ > 3J Z G -1 s I m m A2o % zI ' < z aom I ~ . m c <o nf z m as wI c <m zI m z mi ai c i c 'n t z c I m m I zI m o ~ u -r ~ o I r g . i O RI -1 ! O 1 N < I ~ t t p 1 ! 1 1 1 D ~ 11 Y I 1 1 W 1-N 1 O£ II 10,10 1 N 1 O UI f -1 S I nu iwirn w 10100 i cm i. i. . i. I - I na uiu~ lroiro c uotoo im urn juiw o eoioo ic ~ ero ~ roa ~u o r oi oo 1 a sa e. i. • t. e•. ~m m« tl O 1010 O 1 O 1 00 1 m <O ~ ~ no loio o 40;00 ~1e mn , i c"~ ~ . I I m ~ . P I ~ I 1 t ~ N ~B I u. I 1 1. ~ . 1 s I N~ m l~l 0 10 9d IN XP IWI LI lNI N . I ' q W 1? 1 O A i A 1 O~0 13 . YV Irlp ~ IPIOP IV . ~ 11 t 1 1 1 f ~ 1 I t . . n n ro i o i a ~ i ~ . Y+ ~ I 1. 1. I • 1 C ' ' IIP 16iA A IVI V 1-i 2b IWIV N API P Ip I ~ Y.0 . 1 W I DY P 1 W 1 G . 1 ~ . 9r 1 1 1 1. i D ' ~ LLd IAiN N 1WIOW 13 I - I W i O+ O J 1 O , ~ e I i 1 !1 1 ' - 1 1 I . . ~ p ! N I N i t 1 t 'i ~ R W ~ 1'N 1 N 1 N 1 V 1 ti fl W { N i. W ~ i o . 11 1. 1 1 1 - ~ 1 I i ~ . . ~ ' 0 ' 1 ~ 1 : 1 r• 1 r ~ ~ '~i ~ ~ N4 tb10! AV IOP t- 5 V f P 14 Gt. 1 O IR " R . l } [ + : • 1 . ~ 1 . . I m.l W 9 ~ ' ' I ' II S)1 - 1 P 1 N i VI N I O N ~ r. . H LI . . . ~ . f 4 0 { 1U . P 1 J O W 9 W I 1 ; 4] ~ ~ A{N ~ ~ 1 W I 6~ : W d P 1 Q P 1 L: ~ N. j ~ . A.~ ~ J. ~ . 1.~...1 ♦ . £ S ~ ~ tt i~i i L!1 I b t O Y rt F I ~ ti ' ~ eesYe.v : _ SZYMANSKI / RAY Real Estate Development & Consulting July 10, 2002 Alan White Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 RE: Various Redevelopment Projects. - Wheat Ridge, CO Dear Alan, Pursuant to our discussions, this is a proposal to continue our expanded scope of our services relative to the detenninarion of development feasibility for: , • SWC of 38"` & Sheridan • SEC of 44t° & Wadsworth (Time Square S.C.) • NEC of 44Ih & Wazd • Wheat Ridge Cyclery • Ace Hardware Our purpose is The respohsibility ofSUmanski /Ray is ta assist the N'heat Ridge Redevelopment Authority and the Ciry of WheatRidge in successfu[ly evaluating and accomplishing their redevelopment goals with acceptable site /building p[ans, financia[ terms, ownership and timing. Specifically, our Phase 1 program is to identify and evaluate a potential redevelopment and implementation plans, considering: a Physical feasibility - including parcel and ownership pattems, access, exposure, site size, dimensions, topography and other physical characteristics. ❑ Market feasibility - we will consider the opporhxnity for retail and other appropriate potential uses, including site criteria by retail anchor tenants in an active expansion mode, existing comperirion serving the sub-mazket, criteria such as population density, access and visibility requirements, etc. o Political feasibility - cunent zoning entitlements, City support, potential neighborhood response, etc. A Joint Venwre of Szymanski Development Company and Ray Rea] Estate Services, Inc. STEvsN P. SzymnivsKi (303) 595-3311 • ARNOLD C. RAY, CRE (303) 595-4422 901 AcoMn STREET • DENVER, CO 80204-4023 • FAx: (303) 595-8810 SZYMANSKI / RAY Alan White July 10, 2002 Page 2 of 3 ❑ Financial feasibility -estimated potenfial public costs vs. revenues, potential private risks vs: potential return, any fmancial "GAP", potential public participation, forms of public participation available, public up-front money vs. reimbwsement agreements, TIF capacity, etc. ❑ Implementation potential - who will implement the program? Implementation strategy and schedule, etc. Our primary Phase 1 tasks are: 1. Data collection - pazcelization, ownerships, assessor's "actual values", access, zoning, topography, competition, proposed developments, ownership issues, etc. 2. Brainstorm to idenrify alternative development concepts. 3. Analysis of the alternatives based on the above (physical, mazket, political, financial and implementarion) feasibility factors. 4. Selecrion ofpreferred developmentconcept(s). 5. Definition of the implementation strategy / process. 6. Coordinate and meet with you and the City, as appropriate. Confract terms would be: • Szymanski / Ray would be authorized up to a malcimum of $15,000, including expenses, based on hourly billing at a rate of $150 per hour each for Ame Ray & Steve Szymansld. • We estimate that this phase will require two to three months to complete, depending on the coordination with the City. • We would bill monthly and the contract would be cancelable by either party at any time, with payment due up to the date of cancellation. If you do decide to move forwazd with the implementarion of any of these projects, and decide to work with Szymanski / Ray on the implementation, we can discuss specific Phase 2 tasks and terms at the appropriate time. SrEVarr P. SzYM.sNsxt (303) 595-3311 • ARNOLD C. RAY, CRE (303) 595-4422 901 AcoM.a STaEET • DENvEx, CO 80204 • Fnx: (303) 595-8810 SZYMANSKI / RAY Alan VJhite July 10, 2002 Page 3 of 3 We aze excited about the opportunity to continue to work with you, the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority and the City of Wheat Ridge on these projects. Please let us Imow if you want to discuss our proposal in more detail. Sincerely, Amold C. Ray, CRE Steven P. Szymansld The above workscope is authorized, By: Date: STEvEN P. SzYM.avsxt (303) 595-3311 • ARNOLD C. RAY, CRE (303) 595-4422 901 AcoMn STREEr • DEwsR, CO 80204 • Fnx: (303) 595-8810 City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum TO: Urban Renewal Authority Members FROM: Alan White, Planning and Development Director SUBJECT: Case No. SUP 02-01 DATE: August 1, 2002 F WHEqT O ~ a ~ c~ m °otoRPao The Urban Renewal Authority previously considered this application at the northwest corner of 38' and Sheridan. The Authority requested informaUon concerning an estimate of the potential increase in sales resulting from the fueling facility. This information is not forthcoming. The application is scheduled for pubic hearing before the Planning Commission on August 15'. A finding from the Authority is needed prior to this hearing. The Authority is charged with finding whether the application is consistent with the Urban Renewal Plan. CADocumencs aud Settiugs\alanVviy Documeuts\R'PFles\iJRAVCS sup.wpd