Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/19/2006AGENDA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION January 19,2006 - 1Votice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on January 19, 2006, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF MEIVIBERS 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be recommended for placement on the agenda.) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - January 5, 2006 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.) 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. WZ-05-14: An applicafion filed by Kahsay Abraham for approval of a rezoning from Restricted-Commercial to Planned Commercial Development and approval of an outline and final development plan for property located at 6690 West 44th. Avenue. 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW Bi7SI1!'F8S 10. COMMISSION REPORTS 11. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS 12. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting January 5, 2006 1. 2. 3. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Wheat Ridge Planning Comxnission was called to order by Chair McMillin at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. ROLL CALL Commission Members Present: Commission Members Absent: Staff Members Present: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Anne Brinkman Jim Chilvers John McMillin Jeny Scezney Cassie Spaniel Scott Wesley Kim Stewart Phil Phmuner Alan White, Community Development Director Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretazy Following is the official set of Planning Commission minutes for the public heazing of January 5, 2006. A set of these minutes is retained both in the office of the City Clerk and in the Communiry Development Department of the City of Wheat Ridge. 4. APPROVE ORDER OF AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner WESLEY and seconded by Commissioner SCEZNEY to approve the order of the agenda as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - December 1, 2005 It was moved by Commissioner BRINKMAN and seconded by Commissioner SPANIEL to approve the minutes of December 1, 2005 as presented. The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioners PLUMMER and STEWART absent. 6. PUBLIC FORUM Charles Durbin 3703 Ames Street Planning Commission January 5, 2006 Mr. Durbin expressed concern about the proposed auto parts business to be built at 38h and Benton. He objecfed to the building being built so close to the sidewalk and expressed concern that the building would cast a shadow onto 38th Avenue causing snow and ice buildup problems in the winter. He believed the building should be set back to be in line with other buildings on the street He was also concerned that this building did not require urban renewal approval even though it is in an urban renewal area. He stated that he understood the builder would be asking for a sign vaziance. He believed the signs should meet sign code. Alan White stated that this application has been thoroughly reviewed by staff over the past several months. The property is zoned C-1 and an auto parts store is a use by right in this zone. The urban renewal plan is a guideline for future development. However, unless the zoning is changed, the city is obligated to issue building permits. The streetscape and azchitectural design manual requires setbacks closer to the street in an effort to create a pedestrian friendly situation. The builder applied for a vaziance to allow for more of a setback from the sidewalk, but was denied by the Board of Adjustment. The city presently has no regulations regazding a building's shadowing onto streets and sidewalks. The builder is requesting a variance for sign height. Staff is recommending denial of the variance. 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. ZOA-05-03: An ordinance amending Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws pertaining to public noticing. Tlus case was presented by Alan White. He advised the Commission there was jurisdiction to hear the case and then reviewed the staff report. Commissioner WESLEY commented that as more people receive notices about public hearings, more people will become involved in the public heazing process. Commissioner McMILLIN favored having public hearing notice signs lazge enough to be read from the street. Commissioner BRINKMAN expressed concern that the ordinance has no provision for establishing the length of tnne a sign may be posted on a property. This would especially become an issue when there aze multiple heazings and it could be confusing if old signs aze not taken down right after the hearings. Commissioner SCEZNEY suggested that a provision also be included that would require maintenance of the public notice signs. There was no one from the public who indicated they would like to address this case. It was moved by Commissioner WESLEY and seconded by Commissioner BRINKMAN to recommend approval of the ordinance with the following additions: Notification period for newspapers, public notices and property signs shall be increased from 15 to Zl days. Plannnig Commission January 5, 2006 . The applicant shall post and maintain the sign. • The applicant shall remove public notice sign from property within 72 hours following the public hearing. The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioner STEWART and PLUMMER absent. B. Case No. ZOA-05-06: An ordinance amending Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws pertaining to signage. This case was presented by Alan White. He advised the Commission there was jurisdiction to hear the case and then reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Commissioner McMILLIN commented that while we are decreasing setbacks for buildings we are increasing them for signs. There was discussion about pole signs versus monument signs. The possibility of offering incentives to replace nonconfomvng pole signs with freestanding signs was discussed. For example, fees can already be waived; setbacks could be reduced. Commissioner McMILLIN expressed concern that monument signs placed close to pedestrian corners would prolubit visibility for both pedestrians and motorists. He cited the Stazbucks sign at 38th and Kipling as an example. Commissioner WESLEY suggested that some kind of allowarice be made for line-of-sight issues. Commissioner McMILLIN commented that monument signs all tend to look the same and have no personality. There are also older signs in the city that have historical significance that add character to the city. He was in favor of incentives to replace nonconforming signs. He further commented that he admired the reasonable language contained in the ordinance. Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that she would vote against the ordinance because it would allow nonconformity to continue. Commissioner WESLEY stated that he was opposed to language in the ordinance which allows nonconformity to remain. He commented that some signs could never reduce their setbacks and therefore be nonconforming forever. The strategic plan calls for the city to have a high priority for reducing nonconforming signs. New signage sometimes encourages new customers for businesses. He further commented that passage of this ordinance would send the message that we really don't have a vision for our city. He favored tabling consideration of the ordinance in order to take a closer look at an incentive program. There was no one from the public who indicated they would like to address this case. It was moved by Commissioner WESLEY and seconded by Commissioner CHILVERS to recommend denial of the ordinance amending subparagraph 1 of the nonconforming provisions of the sign code as presented by staf£ The motion passed by a vote of 5-1 with Commissioner McMILLIN voting no and Commissioners STEWART and PLiTMMER absent. Planning Commission January 5, 2006 It was moved by Commissioner WESLEY and seconded by Commissioner SCEZNEY to make a resolution recommending that City Council look at the entirety of the sign code (rather than individual pieces) as it relates to the comprehensive plan, the neighborhood revitalization plan, the streetscape and architectural design manual, and the 20-20 strategic plan. The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioners STEWART and PLUMMER ABSENT. 8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to come before the Commission. 9. NEW BUSINESS . Alan White reported that Winston & Associates would be making a presentation to City Council and he encouraged Commissioners to attend. 10. COMMISSION REPORTS There were no commission reports. 11. COMNLITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS There were no committee and department reports. 12. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner WESLEY and seconded by Commissioner SCEZNEY to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. John McMillin, Chair Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary Planning Commission Page 4 7anuary 5, 2006 ti CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE " PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: Travis Crane CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-05-14/Abraham DATE OF MEETING: January 19, 2006 ACTION REQUESTED: A request for a rezoning from Restricted Commercial to Planned Commercial Development, including an Outline Development Plan and Final Development Plan. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 6690 W. 44`h Avenue APPLICANT (S): Kahsay Abraham OWNER (S): Same APPROXIMATE AREA: 11,900 sq. ft. (027 ac.) PRESENT ZONING: ResYricted Commercial (RC) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Serving Retail (NR) ENTER INTO RECORD (X) COMPREHENSIVB PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTAT[ON ( ) SUBDNISION REGULATIONS Location Map ''s i ~ . P`-1 R3q'u a a ~ q NC : ynr RC' " u): N o m n@ iO ~ ~ e e eo m ~ v N b ~(j O V ~p m ' R-z ` Q Sub ect o 4375 Property ~ - M 0 M W O b b a a h p a CJ . d' . O .f T ~ ~ N N H ~ O b 4305 Q~ d . . o All notification and posting requirements have been met therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. a e Planning Commission WZ-05-14/Abraham I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting a rezoning from Restricted Commercial to Planned Commercial Development. An associated Outline Development Plan and Final Development Plan aze included with the request. The current Restricted Commercial zoning designarion allows a limited range of allowed uses. The existing building on the property will remain. An Outline Development Plan will rezone the property and set development standards, while a Final Development Plan will set a specific development plan for the property (Exhibit 1, L,etter of Request). The property owner wishes to utilize the existing building as a retail liquor stor.e. The property is 11,900 squaze feet in size. II. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Outline Development Plan (ODP) will set all allowed uses and development standards for the property (Eachibit 2, ODP). The ODP also contains a general concept plan which labels areas of landscaping, parking, building footprint, and access points. It should be noted that many of the development standazds are tailored for the existing property; that is, the physical appearance of the properiy will change very little until a redevelopment of the property is to occur. Allowed Uses The subject property is currently zoned Restricted Commercial (RC). The RC zone district allows a limited range of commercial uses. When developing a list of allowed uses for this Planned Commercial Development, the applicant started with the allowed uses in the RC zone district. Some of the allowed uses have been omitted (such as ambulance service, residential uses or temporary Christmas tree lots), as they were impractical for this location, or simply were not desired uses. Any use listed as a special use in the RC zone district has not been included as an allowed use. The applicant then added some uses listed as allowed uses in the Commercial One (C-1) zone district as allowed uses for this property. These uses are as follows: Appliance stores and incidental service and repair Automotive parts supplies and sales Auto service, repair and maintenance shops (minor) Caterers Clinic or office for the counseling and treatment ofpsychological, social, marital, developmental or similar conditions, excluding substance abuse Day care or preschool, small Drug store or pharmacy Electronic and computer sales, supplies and service Home improvement store Leather goods and luggage store Linen supply Liquor store Upholster store (non-automotive) Tbese above-listed uses are allowed uses in the Gl zone dishict. Simply, the applicant wishes to maintain the uses already allowed in the RC zone district, and add the above 13 uses. Staff Planniug Commission WZ-05-14/Abraham feels that auto service, repair and maintenance shops (minor) should be excluded from the list of allowable uses, as it conflicts with desired attributes listed in the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the words "non-residenrial" should be added to Clinic or offce for the counseZing and treatment ofpsychological, social, marital, developmental or similar conditions, excluding substance abuse. " The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation for this properiy is Neighborhood Serving Retail (NR). The Comprehensive Plan states that the NR azeas are to consist of small scale retail and professional services uses, such as coffee shops, bicycle repair shops, flower shops and professional offices. These uses are intended to provide a buffer between the busy street and the neighborhood. The Comprehensive Plan lists the desired attributes of the NR areas as • Small independently owned retail and service establishments that are not dependant on high traffic volumes. • Well landscaped - no outdoor storage, trash azeas must be screened. • No drive through facilities or auto-oriented commercial uses. • Inclusion of bike racks, benches, picnic tables, public art and pedestrian connections. • No expansion into residential neighborhoods. • Height and bulk of the building relate to the adjacent neighborhood. • Hours of operation are restricted. Most of these atlributes are being achieved. The applicant wishes to open a neighborhood serving liquor store. The existing building would be utilized. The property currently does not contain any landscaped area, so the inclusion of landscaping will be a benefit. The trash area: will be screened. There are no drive through uses proposed in the list of allowed uses. While. the property does not contain bike racks, picnic tables or public art, sidewalk connections are being provided where they do not exist. The existing building relates to the scale of the surrounding neighborhood. Landscaping The ODP sets standards for miuimum landscaping. The property currently has no landscaping. The applicant is intending to increase the amount of landscaping. The Code of Laws specifies that a commercially zoned property should have a min;mum of 20% landscaping. The ODP specifies that for redevelopment of the property ('in excess of 50% expansion) a m;n;mum of 15% landscaping is required. The ODP also specifies that landscaping for the existing building is dictated by the quanrities and area provided on the Final Development Plan. Very simply, the landscaping area and quantities of trees and shrubs shown on the Final Development Plan is what is allowed. All other landscape requirements shall refer to Section 26-502 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. Building Coverage A maacimum building coverage of 50% is proposed on the ODP. Building coverage is defined as all azeas of the lot covered by building. The Code of Laws specifies that for Commercial zone districts, the masimum lot coverage (all areas of building and paving) is 80% of the lot. The masimum lot coverage for this properiy will be dictated by the minnnum amount of landscaping required. For example, if 15% landscaping is required, the maximum lot coverage will then be 85% of the lot. Planuing Cominission WZ-05-14/Abxaham Parking The ODP specifies that parking shall be in conformance with Section 26-501 of the Code of Laws. The Code states that m;n;mum parldng shall be required based upon a specific use. The Final Development Plan will detail the amount of parking required and supplied. Building HeightlSetbacks The maximum building height is being established at 35 feet, which is consistent with the commercial zone district. The setback standards for the coxnmercial zone dishicts have been used as a guide, but the required setbacks have been modified on the ODP to conform to meet ttte setbacks of the existing building. The commercial zone districts require a 50 foot front yazd setback for properties adjacent to W. 44`h Avenue, a 5 foot per story side yard setback, and a 10 rear yazd setback. A 30 foot setback is required when adjacent to a public street. The uiiuunum setbacks established on the ODP are as follows: 30 feet for the front yard (adjacent to W. 44th Avenue), 5 feet for the side yard (eastern property line), 30 feet for the westem side yard adjacent to Otis Street, and 8 feet for the reaz yard. Architecture The ODP includes a note which requires any new structures to be compliant with the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. Access/Cixculation The property currently has three access points: two on West 40 Avenue and one on Otis Street. The westem-most existing access point on West 44`t` Avenue will be closed. Each access point will allow full movement. Building Signage An existing sign on the West 44th Avenue frontage will remain and will be reused for the intended business. The existing sign does not conform to today's standazds in respect to size. The Code allows a maxnnum sign size of 35 squaze feet for a 1,400 squaze foot building. The existing sign is 64 squaze feet in size. The sign is 15 feet tall, setback from the property line 11 feet. Both the height and setback conforxn to the Code requirements. The ODP does contain a note which refers to the Code for additional requirements, and any new signage must meet these Code requirements. Lighting The ODP refers to Section 26-503 of the Code of Laws for lighting regulations. Fencing The ODP refers to Section 26-603 of the Code of Laws for perimeter fence regulafions. There is an existing fencing which will remain. The existing fencing does conform to Section 26-603. III. CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a change in zone: 1. That the existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is an error. Planning Commission WZ-05-14/Abraham The existing zone classification on the official zoning map is not in error. The property currently has Restricted Commercial zoning. 2. That a change in character in the area has occurred due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration, or development transitions, and that the evidence supports the finding of the following. There has been no recent change in character to the area. Many of the surrounding properties have had the same zomng designation since the incorporation of the City. The proposed rezoning will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. 3. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. The Future Land Use map in the Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Neighborhood Serving Retail. The proposed zone designation of Planned Commercial Development does fall within this classification. The Future Land Use Map is one component of the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan also contains goals and policies that need to be considered in finding consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning meets the following desired attributes of the Neighborhood Retail classification: The property will be an independently owned retail establishxnent which is landscaped, all irash areas will be screened, there aze no auto-oriented or drive through uses, pedestrian connections will be provided and the heighf and bulk of the building will relate to the existing neighborhood. 4. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. The request is for a rezoning to PCD. A majority of the properties in the azea have some sort of commercial zoning designation. This will be the only property in the neighborhood with PCD zoning. While the PCD designation differs from the RC or C-1 designations, the intent of these zone districts is similar - neighborhood serving commercial development. 5. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. This proposed zone change should create a benefit to the community. The proposed zone change will allow a wider range oF commercial uses. The zone change will facilitate the reinvestment into this property; the applicant will be improving a dilapidated and vacant property. 6. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the ckange of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All responding agencies aze able to serve the properry, and tlie developer will incur the cosf and maintenance of any improvements. That the change of zone will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to adjacent properties. Planning Commission WZ-05-14/Abraham The change in zone wi11 not affect public health, safety or welfare in the area. Traffic will increase from existing conditions, mainly because the building is currently vacant. The amount of traffic generated by the intended use will not overburden the roadway system. This proposed development should not reduce air or light to adjacent properties. 8. That the change of zone will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. This change of zone will create an isolated zone district. There are no properties in the unmediate azea zoned Planned Commercial Development. The property will, however, function in a similar fasluon as the surrounding commercial properties. IV. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The goal of the Final Development Plan is to meet the standazds set on the Outline Development Plan. The FDP is a much more site-specific document which addresses building location, parking, landscaping distribution and architecture (Exhibit 3, FDP). The development regulations written on the ODP have been written to accommodate the existing buiiding. The applicant is not proposing to construct a new building. Parking lot nnprovements and additional landscaping will be the only major changes to the property. The ODP set the maacimum bnilding coverage at 50% of the lot. Based upon a lot size of 11,900 square feet, the building may be a maximum size of 5,950 squaze feet. The existing building is only 1,400 square feet in size. The ODP specifies that the building shall haue a 30 foot front yard setback requirement, a five foot side yard setback requirement for the eastem property line, a 30 foot side yard setback for the western propeity line and an 8 foot rear yard setback requirement. The existing building meets and exceeds these uiiniinuxn setback standards. The building is currently 15 feet tall,. which does not exceed the maacimum building height of 35 feet as established on the ODP. A trash enclosure is being shown on the east side of the building. The ODP requires all dumpster areas to be screened from the right-of-way. A screen wail has been provided, fulfilling this requirement. The applicant wishes to use the property as a retail liquor store, an allowed use on the ODP. Architecture Because the existing building will not be renovated, this section does not apply. If any new building were to be constnxcted, the Architectural standards would apply. The existing building is constructed of block. The buiiding entrance is located on the north elevation. An existing overhead door will be removed. Landscaping The ODP stated that the minimum required landscaping shall be dictated by the Final Development Plan. The FDP details a total landscape area of 1,560 squaze feet, all to be added by the applicant. Based upon a lot size of 11,900 square feet, the applicant is proposing 13.1 % landscaping. Typically, the comxnercial zone districts require a miniinum of 20% landscape coverage. Planniug Commission WZ-05-14/AbraUam The applicant has provided 3 street trees and 25 shrubs. Because the ODP states required landscaping shall be as shown on the FDP, there aze no minimum requirements to be met. It should be noted the property does not meet the m;nimum requirement for street trees (5) as specified in the Code of LaWs. The provided quantity of shrubs (25) exceeds the requirement as specified in the Code of Laws. Parking The ODP specifies that required parking shall conform to the Code requirements of Section 26- 501. Required pazking stails are based upon use and square footage of usable area. A retail liquor store is required to provide 1 pazking stall for 200 square feet of usable area. The existing building is 1,400 square feet in size. A total of 7 pazking stalls are required, with one being a van accessible handicap stall. The FDP details 13 parking stalls and one van accessible stall. All of the pazking stalls meet the iniuiinum required size as specified in the Code. Three pazking stalls aze located directly adjacent to W. 40 Avenue. The Code of Laws requires a fen-foot landscape buffer for pazking lots adjacent to right-of-way. The FDP does not detail a landscape buffer for the 3 stalls adjacent to West 44ffi Avenue. The Code of Laws requires a minimum drive width which could not be accommodated if a ten foot landscape buffer were between the parking stalls and the right of way. Simply, the pazking lot would not function. It should also be noted that the drive aisle does not meet the minixnum width required for two-way traffic (22 feet). A portion of the drive aisle is only 16 feet wide. This reduced width is a by-product of the landscaping to be installed azound the existing sign. The applicant will construct a 3 foot fence on the north side of the pazking stalls adjacent to West 44th Avenue as a screen. This is a requirement in the Code of Laws. Lighting There aze no freestanding lights proposed for this property, as none currently exist: The only source of lighting wiil be building mounted downcast lighting, which must confortn to Section 26-503 of the Code of Laws. V. AGENCY REFERRAL All responding agencies have indicated that they can serve the property, and the applicant will bear the cost of upgrading any service to the property. Because there will be no major site conshuction, a drainage report was not required. The Public Works Department is requiring the consriuction of a small section of curb and gutter where the westem most curb cut is being closed. Sidewalks currently exist azound the perimeter of the property. VI. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The required neighborhood meeting was held prior to submittal. There were approxunately seven attendees from the neighborhood. General questions ranged from the type of development which will occur to the need for another liquor store in the neighborhood. There was a discussion of the current condirion of the building, and the presence of graffiti in the neighborhood. One letter was received after the neighborhood meeting from a neighbar who could not attend the meeting (Exhibit 4, Neighbor Letter).Additionally, one email was received after the meeting. This email has been included (Exhibit 5, Neighbor Email). VII. STAFF CONCLUSION & RECOMIVENDED MOTION(S): Planning Commission WZ-05-14/Abraham Staff concludes that the rezoning is comparible with surrounding uses, and that the alterations to the property should be an improvement over the existing conditions. There are two requests, and each will require a sepazate motion: request for approval of a rezoning and outline development plan and request for approval of a final development plan. REZONIPTG AND OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OPTION A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-05-14, a request for approval of a rezoning from Restricted Commercial to Planned Commercial Development, and an Outline Development Plan for properiy located at 6690 W. 44th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1_ The change in zone is compatible with the.existing condirions in the immediate area. 2. The change in zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare 3. The change in zone substantially meets the desired attributes of the Neighborhood Retail classification in the Comprehensive Plan. With the following conditions: 1. The following use shall be removed from the list of allowed uses on the Outline Development Plan: Auto service, repair and maintenance shop (minor). 2.. The words "non-residentiai" shall be added to the foilowing use: "Clinic or off ce for the counseling and treatment of psychological, social, marital, developmental or similar conditions, excluding substance abuse OPTION B: _ "I move to recoxnmend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-05-14, a request for approval of a rezoning; from Restricted Commercial to Planned Commercial Development, and an Outline Development Plan for property located at 6690 W. 44th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OPTIQN A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-05-14, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for property located at 6690 W. 44th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The Final Development Plan complies with the development standards established by the Outline Development Plan. 2. The Final Development Plan meets the technical requirements as established in Article III for Final Development Plans." OPTION B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-05-14, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for properiy located at 6690 W. 44`h Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. Planning Commission WZ-05-14/Abraham MP14, . . ZN/N~AND PaNN/Nv4ssllC/Alw Consulting Services in Znning, Subdivision, Si[e Planning & Design, and Other7.ared Use En1it(ement Matters GLEN GIDLEY, AICP - Zoning & Real Estate Consultant 8684 W. WARREN DR, LAKEWOOD, CO. 80227 303-763-5221 (Office) 720-962-5334 (Fax) glengidlev@msn.com (Email) TRANSMITTAL TO: City of Wheat Ridge, Community Development Department FROM: Glen Gidley, A.I.C.P. RE: Rezoniug Applicarion for 6690 W. 44'h Ave. DATE: November 8, 2005 On behalf of the applicant and owner, Kahsay Abraham, please find attached required documents related to a rezoning request for property located at 6690 W. 44' Ave. that Mr. Abraham owns under the name of Samuel Properties LLC. The signed application and fees have previously been submitted by the applicant. Mr. Abraham intends to use the property for a small neighborhood liquor store. However, since he has to rezone to Planned Development in order to obtain the land use right for a liquor stare, as that use is not a pernutted use in the Restricted-Commercial zone as it is currently classified, he wants to ensure that he has the future right to several other uses of the property that make sense for this location and on this property should he sell the property to another user. The only proposed changes to the premises will be the addition of landscaping per the plan, the closure of the westem most curb to W. 44th., striping of the pazking lot, a wall sign facing W. 44'h that will conform to City requirements, construction of a trash screeniug gate, and utilization of the eaasting free standing sign standard. Since there will be no changes to drainage, no drainage plan or topo has been provided. Please foreword a copy of the Mineral Rights Certifica6on and we will complete it as required. Please foreword all questions and communications to me rather than the applicant. EXHIBIT 1 ~ ' b~~ ~r i!~ w~~, ■ ~ ■ ~ ~.■r ~ L~' ■ ♦ / Ir"'~ t"~ ■ / • / ~ ~ ~ ~ r t i i : ~ ( 1 ~ ; i r ' A T~ACT OFLANOLt ; - oFS~cric cdouNr~oF SITE ZONED: C-, V/CINITYMAP FF/CE USF• TAVERN/8AR RETAIL 0 DEI/ELOPMENT STANDARDS.• 1 h intentofthis Out/me Deve%pmentP/an is to aJ/orvthe existing deve/apmentto ~ontir~ue in the ' Te currentconfi uration, exceptforadd"~ion of/andscape a~as, parking de/ineation, ~rr~d access 9 bn asindicated on the Duf/ine andFina/Deve%pmentPlans and fo a//owu,ses as permi~ed - PA~,~~p~ m°°''~~~ ACCESS . . ~ " " 1 ses as rmittedir~ the ~ ' R tricted-Commerc~alzone drsGrct, and a fewadd~iona u pe ~ An 1%/I@ BS (TOBEGl.OS~'a) ; l in orremovalar~constructionot CONCRETESlDEWALK ' CONCRETFSIDEWALK - ► Commercial-One zone d~shicf. Anyadd~fions to the exisGngbui a' q, nfPlan. An ~ uest to a/low P&M-~05.oA , _ ~ a new~6uilding; wi//requlre appiovalofan amendedFinalDeve/apme yr~ , m n , ~ , ~ r , i.d ~ t,, ~ . Y ~ ~ ~ j. , an use nots ecifical/ ermi~edornottound ~o be a /eqit~mafe ~imilar Use, pursr~antto Sectio~ ~,,;z ~ ~ , . . ~ • • , , A Yp ~,,~r~ . , : . , . , , . . ~ , ' : Y ' y Final ~ ~ ~ ~r . ~z~ ~ . ~~~z~~, r:~.' , , . i , . . , r . „ eofLaws sha~/r uirea rovalofanamended4r.~lineand ~ A~ , , •Lc~x ~ , 26.307ofthe WheatRidge Cod , eA' PP p/'+ ~ ' " ~D~~N~~LET ' 'rr , r r ~ r .,t ~ ~ V U~lYC ~ ~ ' , i o r Deve% me~t P/a~ ~ . ~ ; ~ ~ A , • EXISTtNG FREE STANDlNG S1GN cC , i S~~'~, ~ ~ . . r, \ ~ r~ , ~ h, ~r~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8'X8'X15'HIGH~ r• C~'~iS.~ _W , ~ ~ O~~ a~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~y~~~~'ti. A~~~ • ' , , ° ' i ` An newdeve% ment oraddifions upon the properl~sha//fully confo~m to the fo/~a~rnq stand . ° ~ ''S•, ' ~ , , Y p ~ 4._~~ ~ . ~ , t . ~ ~ : , ~ r' • ' . "r ~ ~ . ~ .•j, ~J , ~ ~ ~ ~V.,~ ' ~1 ~ f . r ~ exce ta sfd'e which fronts u on a w ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ' ~ i/aiin Setbacks° Front- 30feet,° Sio'e - 5feet p P rr ;A ~ ' Minfinum Bu q , ~ , t~ , , r ' ~ : ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ r' ;r: - eef. ~ , ~ ~ ~ ' r~ . . , • public streetsha!/be 30teet,• Rea~ 8t . ~o\ \u ~ V a i ~ ~\~4 ~ ~ , a ~ ; ~ ~ : + ~ y '~~~g'~ ~\~~\~~~:L \ ~ MaxfmumBul/d~ngHefqht.• 35feet U ~ ~o~~. o. ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' 5~ ~ ,z~~,. ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ . z _ l C~~^~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ' ` \ _ Maximum Bai/tl~ng Coverage; 5l1 / , ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ , ~ ~ , ~o~ ~ ~ . ~etN. \ , ~ \ . orex nsion mo~e than 50 % ofthe ~ ~ ~ ~ LandscapeCoverage.~ Upoaredevelopmentofthisproperfy pa \ ~ e~ ~ ' ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ \ . \~?d~Z.'~' ° a minimum ~f 95 % ofthe tofa//ot area and ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ exisffi builtlin s uare footage, /andscapmg sha//be ~ ~ ~ 9 q ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ : PARKING & CIRCULA~"lON ~ i menfs ofSecfion 2~r502 ofthe WheatRia'ge Coo'e ofLa~s Forfhe use ~ shallavnform to the requre ~ a : ~ ~~:`.Z ~ ~`~~~5~;:~ ~ ~ n rm to the ado tedFinalDeve% mentP/an. offhe exrsfinqbu~/dmg, la~dscapmgshallco fa ,o ~ , , ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . , ~ ~~1~~~.~~~~~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\~t ~~~\~~Z~ ~ ~~`;~.:~~~~~Y~ 1\~\ ~ \ Q~.~~.~~`. fthe Wheaf R~l e Crlde of ~ ~ ~y~~~ , _ Par~rin : Al/parkinq shallbe in eonfonnance wrth Secfion 26-50~ o g ~ ~ , ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ . ~ Z~~ ~ , ~ , \ ~~~=s ~ ~ . ~ Laws o ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~o C~NCRETE v, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~s~ ~ ~ .ti ~V~ ~ . c~ ~ ,v~ ~ Z ~ .1. ~ ~ ~ ~r . , ~Ar`~.A,,..~~ ~ y~.;A~ y~\\\~~ ~ r ~b..~~~ , v. ~A. .~~~~~A 1.C V - ~ with Section 2&503offhe WheatRrd e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tin shallbe in confo~rnance 9 ~ ~o ~ ; ~ ; ~ liqh~inq.• A/lnewe~enorligh g ~ _ i ~ a ~~~~~`z~~~ s~\`~, ~ ~ A..~ ^t.a , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ z.~ ' \ e used as it cu~renfl exists ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ Code ot'Laws Any existing outsio'e liqhtinq mayb Y ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ fi' . ~~~~~~~~j ~ A ~~ZV~~ A ~ ~l ,:~~~~s\~~, . \ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y~~ . . ~ ~ , .'.5 ~ ~ ~C~~.~`~ ~ . ' ~~~~~~~~~c,Z ~~~..~~Y.~. ~ ~ w"h Section 2~r603 otthe Wh~al Rid e Code of ~ ~~~~s ~t ,~~~Y L ~ ~ ~ fenc~n : A//newfencro shal/be in conformance ~t 9 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , ~ ~ 9' ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ 9 o, ~ f ro lmes which includes a 6 foot hi h wooden , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , Laws Exisfing fencmg along the saufh and eas p perfy , 9' , ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ \~"~~r,~~ fence and einder-b/ock wa/J, sha/lrema~n. An axistinq dUapio'afed splrtraE/fence alon~tha r~es~ ZaN~Q: R-~ HA~T , , : ASP s„ , ~ , . . . - . : , . , . ~ ~ ~ i movedandre /aced w~th a 3foofh~ h so%'woadfence, wh~ch shal/serve fo ti~~ ~ bvuadaryshal/be e p 9 ~ ~ v ~ ~a • OFFICE ; USE. ~,z~ ~ ~ ~ 'i n a matchi~ solio' wa~d fence willbe ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~~ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ in . In addrto ~ , ~ screen park~ngbeiween the streetand the build q , 9' a y,`~ , o ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~,~~~v~~~ A~~1~. ~~cyvy~:~`~~` ~~~~e /aced alon(/ the W, 44th Ave, fmretaqe where new,~arkinq spaces wil/b~e addeo; ~erthe Fina! A `J , a ~ ~ .~A~ ~R \ \ ~ ~ ° S`L~~~\ ~ a~\ 4:~\~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ' C1eve%pI77eI1tPl~~I ~::g ~ ~ CONCRETESI~EWALK ~ ~ ~ ~ ;-~1 . ~ ~ z ~ ~ \~Z ~Y~~~\1\ ~ . . \~a~, ~ ~ ~ ~ . w a . F~~ ~ . : . r .`~i~~ •,.~~~u ~ °.~t~~ ~~\~\\z~~~~ . ~\?"~e~~,~~\ ~ A ~S ~ . //be in confoimance withAitic% ~UCfia ter26otfhe WheatRidy~ ~ ~ ~~`~~,4~ ~ Sr na a• ,4//news~qnaqe sha P > ~z ~ , , ~ ~ ~ , J 9 ~ ~ ~ ~A~ ~ ~ : . ,:W, ~ ~ i n/ocated > t south of ~t~ ~ ~t~ , ~ xistin 64 uare foot 15foofhi h, tree standinqsg Ofee , ~ , . , Code ofLaws The e q sq , 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ a~cy r~ ~ ~~Z ~Z~.~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ZZ~ ~ ~ ~~~A ti.~~V ~ ~ q ~7q~/ in ccoro'ance wifh the FinalDeve% mentP/an. ~~o~~ / i the front ro rf line ma be usad a p ~v b ~ L . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ f" M" J ~ ~ ~ V ~ . ~~~A~Z ! ~VAA \ a~ ~~~A~~ VA~A~~~\~~~ ~~V~ ~ ~ ~A~A~V '~a a~~~`'~~ ~A~~. ~c~.~ r ~ ~ h ~\\~\~~~~~\~~5~~ ~\~~~~\`~~l\~`"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\\'~~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ° . / / r s fv be a ro~edb the Commun" , A~~~~~~, ~A~, , ~ ~ ~ Arch%fectura/De.si n: Architectura/defailforanynewsfrucfu e pp y ~J' ~ , ~,A~`~,~~~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~V~~ti ~V'`~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ q \ ~.~1~,.~\~v.~~\~..~~~~~~\~ ~ ~ / i g ~ ~ \ ~V~y~~.~~1,~~\\~~.~~\\\~ ~ / rin accar~ance wi~h the 5'treetsca e andAichrteefura/Des~gn Manual . E ~ A , , \ ~ ~ , . ~ i / / Deve%pmentDirecfo P ~ a~~~\,.~~~~~~.~ ~?~~~\~~~':~"~\\~~2 / ~A~ ~Z.~ \ `Z'~ ~ 'O.~V~~~~\ ~~~~V ! ~ ~,~2~~~ ON~ST4RY 95 , , . ~ , Y~ ~ ~ ~v V\~ ~ ~~~~v~~~ A~~V~\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~'o.~~`~\~~~~ ~ i ~ i h m sters shallbe full scr~ene~'ir~r~ uiew fiom fhe pub/ic ~ ; ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ Ti~shEnc/asure.° A//fras dv p Y ~ ~ s~~ CINDER~•BLOCK ~.s ~ ~ ~ ~ c„ ~ ~ ` ~~~v\~,`~ ~ hts-~f~~ s s~~,~~, ~ ~ , q y ; , , ~ , ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4. ``~~y~~~~~,~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~y~; ~ Q; ~ ~V , : ~ ~M warER MFrF~ Pir BUILL111VG 1400 , . , . . ( ~~~~~~z~ ~ :~~.s~~~ \0 ~ ~J ~ ~ ~ o~~ ~ ~ ~~a ~ ~~`'~~\~~,1~ ~ ~ / / 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / i i ~ ~ , L ~~~~~~Y~~z~. s i / ~ ~ ~Z~ \ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % / PR~JECTDATA, , ~ , , , , ~s, . ~ ti~ . ~ ~~~~~y~.~~~ ~ ~\~~~~y\ v \ ~ ~s, ~ ~ 0~~~~~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~~<~t ~ ~R . ~ , 0 `+s 4. ~ ' ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . . ~.c~ ` ~ ~i ~ p•\ ~ . ~~ti. ~ , `~`~Y.; 1190l1 Sf 100 % r ~ , w ~v~ . ~ _ ~ ~ . / ~ LotArea. ( ) ~ ~b ~ , V ~~~`Z~~ \\r,~~ ;.~l~z~~~ \ i k, ~~~~°\3~ Z~ ~ ~ a.~ f400 sf 91. 8 % ~ \ ~ . ~ ~t~~~ , Buildin Are ~,ti,~.y.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ' r ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ . . , , o . ~ ~ . f 13.1% ~r~• ,'r. , , ~ .•f LandscapeArea.~ >560s ( J , ~ ~ . • , , " ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~r': .~~~a~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ;:~~~~~`~~a~; ~ i e ,t , ~ ' „ r o ~ U . ~ ~ A~ ~ \ , ~ . ~ m .~,~t~.~~\ . ~.~A~ A~A~ ~ O~ r~' ' + ' .1L ' r' " ~ ti ~ f ~\~\~~~~~\~~~3~,`~\~ ~ ~ , ; d, PavedArea.~ 8,940sf(75.~/) ~ . ~^a , . ~ti • r, . ~ f ; o ~ f~~ ~Z~~~~~..~~~ . ' 8. a ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ d ~ . M' ~ ~ ~ \ ~~~a~~. ` ~ \ ~ + . . ~\'~\ti~, ~i. ~ ~ ~ r r ~ m ~ ~ s /~Q~'y+' J~~/.~/O wEV usES• ALLO EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXIS7 TO REMAIN W~4LL 'r` ~ Anti ue sfo~s 26. Hobbyandcra~`stores ZONED; l~ 2 4 2. A are/sfores 2T. Home decorafing and fumishinq stores '°p nts stores USE' 2 FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL 3. A liance storesandincidenta/sen~ice andrepair 2~ Homeimproveme OWNER'S CERT3~f/C,~TE.° PP ' r dios 29. ✓ewelrysa/es and~pairstores andshops, 4 ArtqaUeries o stu m intenance sho minor. 30. Laundryanddrycleaninqpickup stations 5. Aufo senace, repairand a p, 10 4 10 20 e stores The be%wsiqnedowner, ar/eqa/lyde • ~~~5 3~ Lealhergoodsandluqgag „ , 6. Auto pa~ts and supplies 1=10 describedhereon wi!lbe d~ve%ped a~ 32. Linen supp/y. Bakeries, retail, scale feet cond"~ionscontainedinthi,~p/an, and~ n and~inance o~ces 33. Liquorstores 8. Banks, loa 34, Locksmifh sho s appmva/ofa rezonmqto p/annedDei 9. Bic c% stores y 35. Medica/andDental o~ices, c/inics orlabaratones create a uesfed praperfy~rqht. V~sted '0. Blueprinting, photo static copy~nq and otherslmilarreprod~ctiv~ 36. Music stores ofSec6on 2612~ offhe GYheatRidge seNices 37. Newsstands 91 Bookstores, slationaryand cardstores / sfore<s CHARACTER OFDEI/ELOPMENT 38. O~t`ice supp y 12, Busr"ness machine and computerstores ladminisfrative and rofessional. 39. O~ces~ Genera p Siqnature ofOwn~rorAqent >3. Camera a~dphoto seNices andsupplystor~s ~S 40. Optica/sfo The infeat ofthis P/anned Gommercia/Deve%pmenfis to confinue to use fhe 94. Candy, nutand confectionerystores 4' Shae sales an~o~re airstores and shops, xfstin buildin current/ /ocated u n the ro er~ fornei hbo~iaod and Samua/Prope~ties, LLC p e 9' 9 Y ~ p A Y 9 >5. ~aterers 42. Spa~inqqoods stores commun " orientedretailand sen~eces uses as cu~entlypermi~tedin fhe existing KahsayAbraham, Presfde~t ~ 16. Clinic oro~ce forfhe counseling and treatmentofpsych%ical, 4, fud'~o tor rofessiona0 workorteachin otfine ar~s, R ric~ed-Commercia0zone districf with fhe additior~ ofa few uses cu~entl 3 S p 9 esf Y socia/, rnarifa/, deve%,oonenta/ orsimi/arconditlons, exc/udinq hot ra h music, drama ordance, emrilted in the Commercial-One zane district. /n addition, there wi/lbe minorsite P o9 p Y P su bs t a n c e a b u s e. 4 4. Tai l o r, dressma king orc% t hinq a/ fera fion s h o p s mo d"~ ica tions suc h as t he c losure o tone exis tinq cu r~ c u t from W. 4 4 t h Ave., 17. Daycare orpreschoa/, small. 45. Te%~ision, radio, smallapp/~ance ~pairand ser►~ice addition oflandscaping where no /andscaping cu~rently exists, and delineation of - 4 ~8. Druq store orPharmacy, shops parking spaces Existing on fhe sife is a masonry ci~rderb/ockbuild~nq with a sma// Stafe ofCo%rado) 19. Eating estab/ishments, sit down ortake out, na drrve throuqh. 46. Tobacca sfores podion ofthe north and weste%vafions coveredWith dec~rafive stone, Large S,~ J 20. Equipmentrenfa/aqencies with no outside storage. 47. Toysfores store-front windows are situated a/onq the entire no~h e%vatian and wrap around to Counl otJe~'erson y ) 21. F/ora/shops 48. (/pho/steryshop, non-automative. the west e%vation. Since fhis bui/ding was origina//ybui/tas a~ automoti~e fue/and / 99 r:flrr/cn eunn/u_ctnra.c ~Q Vi~an rania/.c sen~ice sfation. the oldaa~aae doorshave been ~placed with fixed windows anda T,._ ....,w ..w,,.,.,, rr•~ , . 23 Gift nove~orsauvenirstOres 50. S/milaruses as determinedbyfhe Community pedestrian access door Tha fwo rastroom access doors currynf/ylocatedon the ~ Y by ! 4. Gmce orconvenience stores no as umps Deve/a entDirector, pursuantto Section 26 307 wesf e%vation willbe removed andblockedm to mafch fhe restotthe wall. One of 2 ry 1 9 P ~ 25 Ha/r, nai/and cosmetic seMIces ofthe W17eatRid9'e Code afLaws the restrooms willremain and wil/be accessed fiom inside ofthe build~ng. The otherwillbe converfedto storage. wi//re uire an amendedfina/ ~Y~ness myhand and o~cial se~al. My Any addifions arlota/~deve/aPment offhe proPertJ~ 9' UN/F/ED C~NTROL STATEMENT Deve%pmentPlan which slral/conform to fhe Deve%pmentStandards as setforfh herein, and as maybe specified ingreaterdetai/bythe amendedFina/ . This PropeltY is current/y, and sha//remain undersingle ownership. Deve%pmentP/an. NofaryPu6/ic ~ -~R ~,~a~~ i I ■ . ~ I ,4 TRAG'T~FIAN~L _ ~ o~s~cr~~ ~OUNTy`0l r ~ ~ S1TE ZONED: C-9 ~ ~ V1CINITYMAP `f ~ USE.~ TAVERN/BAR RETAIL OFFICE' ~ r ~ . ~ . f . . . . . . . PA77ERNER/COLOREDCONCRE7E ~ i 'A ~ ~ '~raeEC~a~~'b) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 , ri ~ CONCRET IDEWALK ~ CONCRETE SIDEWALh „ , , - t i ~ ~ , _ . ~ ~ , ~ ` P&M-105.00 _ q '`CC ~ ~ ~ f; ~ y ~ ~ ~ , r Y, -T~ ~ a . r r . w ~ t r a = ~4„ ',4 , ~Y~ ~ ~ 'r r ~ V ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i . ' ~ ` ~ \ : ~ ~ \ ~ \~V ~ r f ~ \ ~ ~ \ ~ f,. NLET ~ ~ a DRAJN ~6 ~ : ~ \ ~ % ~ ; , -r- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s 1$ l~/~i E~ AN U~' S ~ ~ ~~~v,~~ ~;A ~ DEI/EL4PME/VT STANDAROS,~ ~;,\r , : ~ , , • . ~ X8 15 GH ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~R~~a. Y ~ , ~ , , r. ' ti • 1 \ r~ A ~ ~A\~~~,~ ~ ' , • , , . ' ~ , '•1~• \ ,'~~S\~'u •~7 ',d~ ~L , ent Re uired/Maximum Pravrde~ , 1 ~ , ~ ~ : ~ Dev~lopm q ~ ' ~ ~ °r , ~ w `ti °~o ; ~ ~ , ~ ~ J , ' ~i r • ~i,+~ ~ , . St1t?t~aCt~ " , , ~ , ';f , : ~ ~ ~ ~ :r` ~ o W ~ ~ ~ . r. , . 199t~OS ~.,~900/ 999'OO.~q. ft./1Q0% ~ ~ot Area ~ ~ tim~ ~ , ~ ~ ' U.; ~ ~ Z_ ~ : ~ ~ Lot Cov~r~ge ~ ~ , d ~ ~ ~ ~s ; ~ ~ ~f ~ ° . V ~ ~ r~ls~~~ ss.~~ 10~~0~ . ~r.~ s~.gl ~~os~asq ~ ~so ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ' t , ~ ~~{~8 ~ ~ ~ r ' ~~\~~~5~~ vel~ ment fDP 85/0 ?Q~ 95 s, ff. tVA ~ _ ~ ;Y ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~i ~ ~y ~ $p S . tt. ~Z~~~~ ~i. overa e 50! 5g5~ s . ft. 91. / (9400 q ~ ~ ,,y, ; . l u ~ . Bu~Cd~n C ~ q ~ `J `J ~~r„~~~Y ~ ~ , 1J~ ~ ~ \ Burldin Nei hf 35 ft. y ~ 9 g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ; ~ \ " \a~. a i~~~._:a3.~. ~~~~.~.~~.~,J.:. ~ . ~ \ y ~ tiz~\ ~ ~ \ ~ w+ L a~ks ; .~~~,n+EwsFr ff~ct~ t~, ~ _ ~PARKING ~ CIRCULATION z~z~ 8u11drng S~tb ~Y ~ : _ . ~v ;.`3^~y~~ ~yZ f~. \ ~ SOLID WOOD FENCE TO . ~1'Ollt ~ ~ ~ SCREEN PARKING AREAS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~St SNBS~ 1~ G~S~ JD ~ ~ s~~~ ~ ~f1~8 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v , \ y . \ ~ ~ ~ ~ , A. ~ ~ s V\~\~ weSf ~ , Rear 8 f~. ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ; . ~ . ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ . ~y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~3,~, ~~.r, ~ . f .V~~ 1° 9560 s . ff. ~3.1% ?560 s . ~ ~f~~;~~~~z, ,~a~,~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~CO CRETE , , ~ ~ ndsca e Area 93. /o ~ G' ) ~ ~ , ~ , ~ , ~ , , La ( q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ A . w~ Z , ~ ~ ~ V ~Ac~ e~~ A ~ L ~ . ~ ~ ~ i, ~ . ~Ar,t~~~~~~~~~~A~~\ ~~~~i ~ .~o~ ~ „ t..~.. ~ ~ \ .\\Z~.~l:~ ~ :~"'~,~:a~~~~\\~~ ~~~.~~~u~`~: ~ i. P~rkrrr(~ 9 s ace er each ~00 14 spaces rrrclud~ng ; , , , ~ ~ , ~ 1 . ,a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~Y ~<A\. y ~A y~~0. ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~i~~~rV~A ~ ' , \ . ace ~ , ~ ,,~ti~ ~ . s . ~t. of flo~r area d ? hand~capped sp , , ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~t~~ , \ s~~~~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~. ~ \~y ~ 1 s~}aces re(~uired y~ 1~ 't ~V~ ~ . a ~ ~ A A~ ~ - ~.~o ~ ~ ~\Q~~ . \ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ . \ ~ ~ti~ \@~~ ~ ~ ~ r ce t~A 9 3 3 ,~q. f~. ~:A ~ ~ ~ ~ lnter a ~ a ~ ~ : ~ , . , ~ ~ p ~ ~ y~~ ~~~n~~az~ ~ ~..~y . ~~Y ~ .~i \ti , ~az. ~ ONED: R-C fi~~ ~~,\`a~, Z . ~ ASPHALT., ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ \~~e ~ ~\~1.~ :~1~ ~ ; , \ Z~ \ ~ ~ , v.:~ ~ ~ - ~ , ~w~~~~Z~~ ~,z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ USE. OFFICE t ~ ,,~,,,z ~ . , o ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ / ~~(y' Lr hrrrr Cvr~formance wrth Sec. C~nformance wifh o ~ . ~ ~ t~~ ~y ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ . . \ \~Z~\~ ~ ~RL ,j G~~/ C. ~41~ O\ ~ ~ ~~~,~~~`~\~~~Z~~~ : ~ ~ L~.~ld,l ~4 ~~ti, VV~~it~~ ~~i ,'Y~ ~ . . ~ ~ , ~~~~CONCRET'~ SIDEWALK , ~ Rrdge Code of taws ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a.\~ ~~z. . . € J ~ @~~:: : k ~ ~t ~ ~ : ~ ~ Cor~forman~e wifh Sectron Conformance wlfh ~~~~~~~~~~~y~~,~, Y ~ ~ ~ Fenc~ng ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , ~ ~~~~~~~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . s~,~~~~~~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ , 26-6d3 of fhe Wheat Se~tton 26.60~3 I z~„~, ~ ~,~~~~r~~\~~ ~~~~~~~~~~C~`~~\~ i ~~~~~~s~ / Z ~ , ~ ~ ~ e of Laws ; ~ t Rid e Cc~d ~ tit , a~~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ 3 ,~~z,~ , / - . 'S ..y3Z y~~~\ , Y.~•. / l I1 ry ~ ~ ~ Conforma p• , ; ,,~ti~~,~,, , ~ z, ~ n n r~ce wifh Si r~ ~Jse o~ ~xtstfny 64 s ~ / i V~~If~~S~i ~ " ~~\~v~~.~' \~~~~~~~j\\\~ \ti.~ - ~ ~ ~ / Z~, ~ V A~ ~~AA~. , x' ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~~.~~~~~;~a. Code, Arfrc~~ V~t, Cha ter freestandin sign , , : , ~ ~y~ ~ / j ~ p 9' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ,4;~"~~`~.~~~~~~~~~ / , ~ ~~~.p ~\.AAA~'y~.",~. . A~ ~A~ A~.. "~L~, A~ : +a,~ . ~ . ~ ~\a~~ \\~~~\\\~\~Z\ ~fi caf the Whe~t R~r~ge at c~rrenf helghf of Y. ,,~1, 41VE ST~RY 15 ~ ~ ~ Z~,~ ~ ~~~z~ • F , Q , ~ c. ~ ~ : ~\y~~~.~ ~ ~ ~\~~V\~~~\1 . ~ ~ i i i i i i ~~de ~f Laws 95 ft. and rn current ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ' S ~ ~~~y, ~ ~ ~ ~ CINDER~BL(~CK : . ~z ~ ~a ~ I~cafiarr. An other lu ; ~ ~ . ~ ~ Y ~ "~v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i Pr-- s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'Q' ~\a~~~~\~,~~ ~~~sy~~~~a `~.iy~~ \ \ h~ ' n sh ll be in , ~ ~ ~ ~ . S~g ~ ~J'~ , WATERMETERPIT,~~,~~~~~~~~~~.~~,~~~a~~~~~~~~~~,, BUILDIl~G(1400 V~~~~`.' ,~A ~~V~~.~~~~~C ...A~ AA ~ ~.,~.~.~~a . \Y~~ ~ ~.L\~~ \\~\'~1 a conformart~e with ~s, ~ l'' ~ , ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ : ! ~ ~ ~~~x, v~ ~ Sr n Coder Article I. ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : . z~:\~ ~k~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~V~~~. ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~z , ~ a ~ . ~ i V~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~R ~a ~ ~ : a ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ .~~~~~~\~y,~~. t~ / ,a ~ ~ ~~~~z\ ~5~~\~O~Z~\~~~~~ ~ / ` ~R\~ , \ . ~ ti. \ ~ ~ J ~ ~ \ . e~ ~ ~ \ y ~ . ~ ~ a\~~\~ ~`.\y\~~ f. ~ , p P • ~ ~n ~ ~ ~~~a~~~. ~~y~\~@ ~ ' J ' . ~ , ~ \ , i ~ r .,p ' j r ~ ~ ` ~ Y ~ . f , f r , . ,'r ~ _ Y~` ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ r 9~ a `'r _ ; ~ ~ ! ~ . y , ~ , . / , ~Z~~~~~~~,'~\~.~p~~, , i'°, ' ~ ' ° e.~~.;~ j.'~ ~ ~ \ ~ F~ ° d~ ~ r ~ ~ ~'v`~a~~~\~\~,~~~ ~~'cc ~\~'~~L~~~~\ d ° e: ° : . ' . ' i ~C~vY~ y~, ~c\\ ~ ~ . o ~ , . , ~ a~B ``~;\~~`~`~~~~~i~~~~~ . ~ , ~ . ~ \ ~~~~~~~~ti ~ . ~ \ ~ ~ Z„ ~ ~ - - - - - , " ~ P&M-920.00 LANDSCAPESCHEDULE, ' ~ ~ ~ / ~ I ~ EX1STlNG 6' NIGH SOLlD WOOD EXlS ~ FENC~ TO REMAIN WALI u~r►ti~ Siz~ ~~r~m~n Nar~e ~~rn~~1 ~ y ; ~ f~. ~~r~ r~ 7'r~~s p . ~ a1. A! ir~~ Ccrrrerrt AC ZONED; R-2 Shrubs 2~ g p~ , f~l~ ~n€~er Tr~es ' • ' ' ~ ' 0{~YNERS CER~'/F/CAlf;~ ~r~r~r~d ~~~~Y' . E.° FAMILYRESIDENT/AL US 2 G:... C~v~r & ~h~ubs, Ri~~r Rvck 8et~ind ; ~ . . . , The be%w signed owner, orl~qally desis Li~~~g ~ ~ , ~ ~ • ; ~ : ~ desaribed hereon wi//be deve%ped as ~ Nr~n~rv~ng q conditions canta/nedin th/sp/an, ~ndas approvalofa rezoniaq to P/anned Deve~ cr~ateavestedprope~fyrighf I~estedp~ Sectior~ 26-121 ofthe Wheat~Ridge Cod~ Siqnature ot'Ownero~Aqent CHARACTER OFDEI/EL~PMENT.• SamualPrope~ties, LLC KahsayAbraham, Presidenf T'he intentofthis Final Deve%pmentPlan (fDPJ is fo al/owfhe existing developme~rtto confinue ' exce fforaddition of/andsca e areas arkin de/ineafion and access in fhe current configuration, p p , p 9 , madi~cation as irtdicated on the Outline and Fina/Deve%pmentP/ans and to a//owuses as perm~ted in the Restricted-Gommercialzone district, and a fervadd'~tiona/uses aspermiftedin fhe Comme~ia/ O~e zo~e d"strict. Anyadd'~ions lo ~he existinqbui/dinq, orremova/ and construction State ofCaloradoJ ofa newbui/d~ng, wi/lrequire approva/ofan amendedFinalDeve/apmentPlar~ Anyrequestfo J SS a//owanyuse notspec~cal/ypennit~ed o~nottound to be a/egitimate "Simi/arUse", pursuantta Couafyof✓eft'erson~ Section 26-307ofthe WheatRidqe Code otLaws, shall~quire approva/ofan amended Outline r.:._i n,..,,,i Dl~., Thc fnronninir inefirrmon} wac ae{rnnw/a . diiu r'iitdl uavciuA1ii1cuc r/all, ....w ~ _ , _ , . • -.a by CASE HlST4RY UN/F/ED CONTROL STATEMENT 10 4 10 20 Za~~ing And 1'1•annitig Associatzs 1 10' WL7"~5-13 Cnnsult;rrg Ikrvdces in !€rsrrig und %arxr! Ui•r A40.1ters feet This propertyis currently, and shallremain undersiag/e ownership, ~ni~/cn~/ A.fvrnmmiccinnarniroe~ C.1,F.N f:III11,FV. A ICP ~ scaie W"rtness myhand andoff"icia/seal. My c _ NotaryPublic ~ ~ I EXHIBIT 4 C Mne Cain 4320 otLs st WheatRidge,CO 800334935 QC„/2r .~o . oZ., 0 0 S to ~ ~c~~ ~rr , , • a O 3 Y -~7zllz ~ nJp J G ri ~A10 IJ G H GL_ G~ ~ Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT 5 Travis Crane From: Wymoor@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 7:16 PM To: egokey@comcast.net Cc: Travis Crane Subject: neighborhood meeting 10/18/05 Coucilman Gokey, I attended the neighborhood meeting at 6:00 pm on Tuesday 10/18/05, I have a concern for the proposal to . rezone the property at 6690 W. 44th Ave. to C-1. The current proposal of a liquor store is a questionable way to improve the appearance of the area and decrease the crime that is taking place along that stretch of 44th. The "tagging" that has been occuring over the past two years is likely to increase with that type of business coming into our neighborhood. In addtion the rezoning that would allow for light automotive work would mean more traffic in the area. As a homeowner and member of a young family, I feel that this area would be better served if it remained zoned R-C and a business were to move into that building that would not remain open until midnight. Perhaps our neighborhood would be better served if the growth took into acount the young families in the area. I look forward to your quick response. Thank you, Ryan Moore 4375 Marshall St. 10/19/2005 City of Wlieat Ridge ~~F WHEqTP ~ Community Development Department = ° c~ m Memorandum ~~(pRpO~ TO: Planning Commission FROIVI: Alan White, Community Development Director SUBJECT: 7anuary 17'h Training DATE: January 12, 2006 Planning - Your Role January 17, 2006 Approximately 6:30 p,m. Wheat Ridge Recreation Center 4005 Kipling As I inentioned at our last Planning Commission meeting, there will be a training session about planning on the night of January 17a: The session is for Councii members as well as Planning Commission members, It will be held at the Recreation Center, 4005 Kipiing. I anticipate the session will begin about 6i45. (There aze other items on the CounciPs study session agenda that night prior to this item.) Please pian to attend. Jeff Winston of Wuiston Associates, the consultants who prepared the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy, and I wiil be conducting the session.