The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/02/2007AGENDA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION August 2, 2007 (A pre-meeting will be held ia the 2°d floor conference room beginning at 6:30 p.m.) Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on August 2, 2007, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be recommended for placement on the agenda.) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - July 19, 2007 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.) PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. MS-07-02: An application filed by Dale Brothers for approval of a 2-lot minor subdivision plat for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 3661 Miller Street. B. Case No. WA-07-04: An application filed by Crown Land Development for approval of a variance to the 500' maximum cul-de-sac length for property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located at approximately 3301 Quail Street. C. Case No. WS-07-01: An application filed by Crown Land Development for approval of an 11-lot major subdivision plat for property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located at approximately 3301 Quail Street. D. Case No. WF-07-01: An application filed by Crown Land Development for approval of a Class I Fiood Plain Special Exception Permit to allow street and other subdivision improvements in the Lena Gulch 100-year flood plain for property zoned Residenrial-One (R-1) and located at approximately 3301 Quail Street. 8. OTHER ITEMS 9. ADJOURNMENT F wHEqr City of Wheat Ridge R ~ a Community Development Department ~ m Memorandum C~~~Rp~o TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kathy Field ~ SUBJECT: Pre-Meeting DATE: July 27, 2007 A pre-meeting is scheduled far Thursday, August 2nd, at 6:30 p.m. in the 2"a floor conference room. The topic of this meeting is the Wadsworth Corridor Subarea Plan. Following your training session, you will adjourn to the council chambers for the regular meeting starting at 7:00 p.m. I, \ City of Wheat Ridge ~F W"~~r~ Community Development Department ~ m Memorandum ~~~~RA~~ TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sally Payne, Interim Community Development Director :5p SUBJECT: Wadsworth Corridor Subarea Plan DATE: July 26, 2007 Planning Commission was copied on a July 2°d memo from Mayor DiTullio regarding City Council's motion at their July 9`" public meeting regarding the Wadsworth Comdor Plan. I wanted to be sure all of Planning Commission received this memo and are aware of the changes City Council is requesting be made to the Plan. In case any one did not receive it, a copy of the memo is attached. City Council basically asked that the 162 foot ROW originally outlined in the Plan be changed to 150 feet. In addition, rather than the Plan recommending the Multi-Way Boulevard as the preferred altemative, City Council requested the plan list a range of alternatives possible for Wadsworth Blvd. that would fit within the 150 foot ROW. Council also requested that the Architectural and Site Design Manual indicate Wadsworth Blvd. as a Traditional Overlay rather than the Contemporary Overlay. This means the build-to line would be 0-12 feet in the Traditional rather than 0-20 in the Contemporary. The Wadsworth Comdor Plan is scheduled far the August 16 Planning Commission public hearing and for the August 27 City Council public hearing per CounciPs motion. Planning staff is currently making revisions to the Plan as requested by Council in their motion. If you have questions, please contact me at 303-235-2852 or spaynegci.wheatridge.co.us. \ City of Wheat Ridge Office of the Mayar E WHEqT O P ti o U m ~~IORP~o Memorandum TO: City Council CC: Planning Commission Randy Young, City Manager Alan White, Community Development Director Rob Osborn, Wheat Ridge 2020 Randy Jensen, Regional Transportation Director for CDOT Region Six FROM: Jerry DiTullio, Mayor DATE: 7/2/2007 SUBJECT: Wadsworth Corridor Plan Recommendations and Next Steps As you know, there have been ongoing discussions with citizens, property owners, CDOT staff, DRCOG staff, City staff, Councilmember Schulz, Councilmember Berry and the Mayor's Office with regards to the proposed Wadsworth Corridor Plan. The goai has to been to develop a common-sense and timely approach to the reconstruction of Wadsworth Blvd. and to examine the possibility of funding an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) in conformance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by CDOT. Either study would eventually be required by CDOT before any actual reconstruction takes place on Wadsworth Blvd. Performing the required NEPA study would facilitate a more efficient time schedule and funding mechanism for the possible reconstruction of Wadsworth Bivd. A NEPA study by CDOT is a full and transparent public process that generally takes 12 -18 months to compiete. I would like to thank Region 6 Director Randy Jensen from CDOT and his staff for attending multiple meetings with Wheat Ridge and providing valuable input. Based on these high level discussions, the following proposed action plan and motions are recommended to City Council for the July 9`h City Council meeting: ~ Julv 9`h Citv Council Meetinq I MOVE to indefinitely postpone City Council Resolution 15-2007 a resolution amending the 2007 budget for funding of a Wadsworth Blvd traffic study by the City. Council VOTE I MOVE to rescind parts of the motion made on March 26, 2007 directing staff to refine the road design concepts and present them to Council prior to October 23, 2007, and directing staff to prepare an overlay zone to establish a build-to line. Council VOTE I MOVE to direct the City Manager's Office to modify the draft Wadsworth Corridor Plan to read as follows: o Public road improvements along Wadsworth Blvd, within the plan area, shall not exceed 150 feet in width. Language regarding the preferred alternative of a multi-way boulevard shall be amended to include the range of alternatives outlined in the Appendix: the multi-way boulevard, the modified 1999 template, and the asymmetrical boulevard. I FURTHER MOVE to direct that the City Manager's Office shall modify the Architectural and Site Design Manual to change the overlay area designation along Wadsworth Blvd, within the plan area, from Contemporary to Traditional. Within the setback range established for the traditional overiay area, The City Manager's Office shall set minimum and maximum building setbacks, so that the pedestrian features of the three Roadway Design Alternatives are preserved. I FURTHER MOVE that prior to August 27, 2007, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing on the modified Wadsworth Plan and forward its final recommendations on the plan to City Council. I FURTHER MOVE that on August 27, 2007, in a public hearing, the City Council shall consider adoption of the modified Wadsworth Corridor Plan. Auqust 27, 2007 Public Hearina (Public Hearing motions and resolutions to be drafted by the City Manager's Office as needed based on the foilowing action pian below) • At a public hearing, City Council will act on the modified plan. City Council believes it is in the best interest of the community to further study the range of roadway alternatives for Wadsworth in conformance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). To that end, upon adoption of the Wadsworth Plan, the City Manager's Office shall: o Submit a Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) application to the Denver Regional Council of Governments for a Wadsworth Corridor NEPA study. Prepare a budget amendment to the 2007 budget for 50% of the costs of the NEPA study. The monies will be taken out of the city's reserve and used as a 50% match. The monies will only be used if 50% funding from other sources, such as CDOT or DRCOG, is obtained. In a separate resolution, approve a budget amendment to pay 50% of the costs of the NEPA study. This need not be done until CDOT is ready to do the study. Otherwise, a supplemental appropriation will have to be made each year to carry over the funds. Direct the City Manager's Office to submit a copy of the 1999 Wadsworth Plan to CDOT as additional information to consider during the NEPA study. Please feei free to call with questions or clarifications. Thank you. \ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION ( Minutes of Meering July 19, 1007 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission was called to order by Vice Chair CHILVERS at 7:05 p.m. in the City Council Chainbers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29`h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commission Members Present: Anne Brinkman Jim Chilvers ; Dick Matthews John.McMillin Davis Reinhart ' Kim'Stewart Cassie Spaniel Commission Members Absent: Jerry Scezney' Staff Members Present: Development Payne;`Sr. Planner Nguyen, Engineering Manager ;azzeri, Secretary 3. 4. ` APPROVE ORDER OF AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner MATTHEWS and seconded by Commissioner REINHART to approve the order of the agenda. The 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - June 21, 2007 It was moved by Commissioner McMILLIN and seconded by Commissioner SPANIEL to approve the minutes of June 21, 2007 as presented. The motion passed 5-0 with Commissioners BRINKMAN and STEWART abstaining and Commissioner SCEZNEY absent. 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) ~ ~ Planning Commission Minutes - 1- July 19, 2007 There was no one present to address the Commission at this time. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. WPA-07-02: A resolution adopting the Bike and Pedestrian Route Master Plan. The case was presented by Steve Nguyen. He reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended adoption of the resolution for reasons outlined in the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner MATTHEWS and seconded by Commissioner STEWART to adopt Resolution 042007, a resolution recommending adoption of the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan, and forward this recommendation, along with the Resolution, to City Council for their consideration. Commissioner McMILLIN offered a frier place a high priority on the north-south c+ and Kipling Street to link up with the pro they open. The amendment was accepted MATTHEWS and STEWART. nendment that the City ions along Ward Road light rail stations before The amended motion passed 770 with Connnissioner SCEZNEY absent. B. Case No. WPA-06-05: A resolution adopting the Fruitdale District Subarea Plan. St~f recommended adoption of the resolution. was presented by Sally Payne. She reviewed the staff report and Commissioner McMILLIN asked if traffic calming devices had been considered for 44`h Avenue. Ms. Payne stated that she was not aware of any discussion regarding calming devices. Alan White commented that calming devices could present a conflict on a street that is a critical snow and fire route. STEWART stated that access to the north side of 44'h Avenue needs to be addressed. In response to a question from Commission STEWART concerning requirements far a traffic light, Alan White explained that there is a warrant process that considers many factors before a traffic light can be approved. Planning Commission Minutes - 2- July 19, 2007 Commissioner BRINKMAN expressed concern that the area proposed for ( commercial is not big enough to sustain itself in the long term. Commissioner McMILLIN agreed that this is a valid concern. Commissioner REINHART asked what staffls original recommendation was for the area now proposed as agricultural. Sally Payne replied that staffls recommendation for this area would be single family. Commissioner STEWART commented that the I-70 interchange will impact the area and she believed the right mix of commercial uses would be sustainable. Commissioner McMILLIN stated that he would' like to see the entrance to Prospect Park improved. Gary Shoemaker 4500 Robb Street Mr. Shoemaker is the owner of the stated that he would be amenable to his property that would promote the the sod house. The building would Shoemaker and his family through The facility could share parking wi to cooperate with the city in bringi property would.have to be rezoned is two acres beingconsidered for apark. He bringing in a historic building to place on historicaf aspect of the Baugh House and have a commercial benefit to Mr. uses such as a reception facility or shops. th the Baugh House. He stated his desire ng historical flavar to the area. The from agriculture if a commercial building Terry Railton 4615 and 4625 Simms Mr. Railton owns a duplex at the above address. He suggested that instead of promoting new single family houses, existing rentals could be reduced by improving the area. This would attract owner-occupied properties. He planned to renovate his duplex and sell as single family units for home ownership. However, duplexes cannot be converted into owner-occupied units if urilities cannot be separated. He eommented that the city is treating the area as rental use only. He didn't believe the city is being proactive in cleaning np the area. In regard to calming devices on 44`" Avenue, Mr. Railton expressed concern that these devices would reduce the amount of traffic flow through the area. Additional policing would serve to slow traffic. Commissioner McMILLIN read a portion of the plan that addresses Mr. Railton's concerns about code enforcement issues. Commissioner BRINKMAN encouraged Mr. Railton to also express his concerns to City Council. She also questioned whether the future land use l map should show duplexes in the subject area. Planning Commission Minutes - 3- July 19, 2007 Commissioner CHILVERS commented that many improvements to this area will be economically driven by people who want to locate in the area and the subarea plan will be of benefit when this happens. He was not in favor of narrowing 44t" Avenue. He also suggested that the attachments to the original Fruitdale schoolhouse detract from the original architecture and should be removed. It was moved by Commissioner McMILLIN and seconded by Commissioner STEWART to adopt Resolution 03-2007, a resolution recommending adoption of the Fruitdale Subarea Plan, and forwarding this recommendation along with the Resolution to City Council for their consideration. Commissioner BRINKMAN offered a friendly amendment to modify the Fruitdale Subarea Plan map on page 19 to change the area designated for duplexes between Robb and Swadley and I-70 and 45tn to target area promoting home ownership; and on'page 23: under Parks and Recreation, No. 1 should be reworded as follows: Work with property owners on Robb Street between the Baug1T House antl the historic park to iiivestigate ways to utiliZe this property for a contmunity benefit consistent with the Isistoric nature of the surroundiy2g area. The amendment was accepted by Commissioners McMILLIN and STEWART. The.;amended morion passed 7-0 with Commissioner 8. OTHER BUSINESS It was moved by Commissioner REINHART and seconded by Commissioner. BRINKMAN to thank Alan White for his years of service to the City of Wheat Ridge. The motion passed unanimously. 9. It was moved by Commissioner STEWART and seconded by Commissioner SPANIEL to adjourn the meeting at 8:40 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Jim Chilvers, Vice Chair Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes - 4- July 19, 2007 u~~WH~TA~m CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT °~coa'oo TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: Travis Crane CASE NO. & NAME: MS-07-02Brothers DATE OF MEETING: August 2, 2007 ACTION REQUESTED: A request for approval of a two-lot subdivision plat for property zoned Residential Two. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3661 Miller Street APPLICANT (S): Dale Brothers OWNER (S): same 9822 Chadwick Way Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 APPROXIMATE AREA: 24,840 sq. ft. (0.57 ac.) PRESENT ZONLNG: Residential Two (R-2) ENTER INTO RECORD: ( ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS CASE FII.E & PACKET MATERIALS DIGITAL PRESENTATION All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to heaz this case. I. CASE ANALYSIS The applicant (owner) is requesting approval of a two-lot subdivision plat. The property is currenfly zoned Residential Two (R-2), and contains a single-family structure and associated outbuildings. The applicant wishes to subdivide the property and create two lots. The R-2 zone district allows single- and two-family residential structures (depending on lot size) and accessory buildings. The property is 24,840 square feet in size. Lot 1- Existina Structure There is an existing single-family structure located on Lot 1 that will remain. The existing outbuildings will be removed. The R-2 zone district development standards were used to examine conformance with lot coverage and setbacks in relation to the newly created lot line. The subdivision plat will create a new side yard property line on lot 1, and the existing primary structure must meet minimum side yard setbacks from this property line. A main structure in the R-2 zone district must haue a minimum side yazd setback of at least 5 feet, with a combined side yard total setback of 15 feet. The existing house will be approximately 15 feet from the newly created side yazd (northern) property line. The R-2 zone district allows a maximum of 40% of the lot to be covered by structures. Given a lot size of 10,620 squaze feet, a maximum of 4,248 square feet of lot coverage is allowed. The existing structure has a footprint of approximately 1,549 square feet, giving a total lot coverage of 14.58% on the newly created Lot 1. Any new structure constructed on Lot 2 must meet the applicable setback and lot coverage standazds. The newly created Lot 2 is large enough for a two fanuly dwelling in the R-2 zone district. II. SUBDIVISION PLAT The plat will subdivide the property into two lots (Exhibit 1, Plat). Each lot will have direct frontage on Miller Street. When subdividing a parcel into multiple pazcels, each newly created parcel should meet the district standazds for minimum lot size and width. The minimum size and width of an R-21ot is based upon type of residential structure located on the lot. A single family structure in the R-2 zone district requires minimum lot size of at least 9,000 squaze feet and a minimum lot width of at least 75 feet. A two-family structure in the R-2 zone district requires minimum lot size of at least 12,500 squaze feet and a minimum lot width of at least 100 feet. I.ot i will be 10,620 squaze feet in size, with a lot width of 75 feet. The existing single family structure will remain on this lot. I.ot 2 will be 14,221 square feet in size and 100.41 feet in width. This lot will be large enough for a two-family structure to be constructed. Aaencv Referral All responding agencies have indicated that they can serve the property, and the applicant will bear the cost of upgrading any service to the property. Typical utility easements are being established around the perimeter of each lot. All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to heaz tlus case. 1. CASE ANALYSIS The applicant (owner) is requesting approval of a two-lot subdivision plat. The property is currently zoned Residential Two (R-2), and contains a single-family shucture and associated outbuildings. The applicant wishes to subdivide the property and create two lots. The R-2 zone district allows single- and two-family residendal structures (depending on lot size) and accessory buildings. The property is 24,840 square feet in size. Lot 1- Eaistin¢ Structure There is an existing single-family structure located on Lot 1 that will remain. The existing outbuildings will be removed. The R-2 zone district development standards were used to examine conformance with lot coverage and setbacks in relation to the newly created lot line. The subdivision plat will create a new side yazd property line on lot 1, and the existing primary structure must meet minimum side yazd setbacks from this property line. A main structure in the R-2 zone district must have a minimum side yard setback of at least 5 feet, with a combined side yard total setback of 15 feet. The existing house will be approximately 15 feet from the newly created side yard (northern) property line. The R-2 zone district allows a malcimum of 40% of the lot to be covered by structures. Given a lot size of 10,620 squaze feet, a maximum of 4,248 squaze feet of lot coverage is allowed. The existing structure has a footprint of approximately 1,549 squaze feet, giving a totallot coverage of 14.58% on the newly created L,ot 1. Any new structure constructed on Lot 2 must meet the applicable setback and lot coverage standazds. The newly created I.ot 2 is lazge enough for a two family dwelling in the R-2 zone district. H. SUBDIVISION PLAT The plat will subdivide the property into two lots (Exhibit 1, Plat). Each lot will have direct frontage on Miller Streek When subdividing a pazcel into muluple pazcels, each newly created parcel should meet the district standazds for minimum lot size and width. The minimum size and width of an R-21ot is based upon type of residential structure located on the lot. A single family structure in the R-2 zone district requires minimum lot size of at least 9;000 square feet and a minimum lot width of at least 75 feet. A two-family structure in the R-2 zone district requires minimum lot size of at least 12,500 square feet and a minimum lot width of at least 100 feet. Lot 1 will be 10,620 square feet in size, with a lot width of 75 feet. The exisung single family structure will remain on this lot. Lot 2 will be 14,221 squaze feet in size and 100.41 feet in width. This lot will be lazge enough for a two-family structure to be consiructed. A¢encv Referral All responding agencies haue indicated that they can serve the property, and the applicant will beaz the cost of upgrading any service to the property. Typical utility easements are being established around the peruneter of each lot. The Subdivision Regulations require that parkland dedication is required for any residential subdivision. Typically, this takes the form of a fee in lieu of land dedication. This fee will be f collected at time of building pernut submittal. Additionally, the need for either the installation of or escrow for curb, gutter and sidewallc will be examined at time of building permit submittal. M. STAFF CONCLUSION & RECOMIVIENDED MOTION (S): Because this is a two-lot minor subdivision, Planning Commission is the £mal deciding authority. Staff concludes that the proposed subdivision meets all of the requirements of Article IV of the Code of Laws. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the subdivision plat. OPTION A: "I move to APPROVE Case No. MS-07-02, a request for approval of a two lot subdivision plat for property located at 3661 Miller Street, for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. All required utility easements aze being provided. 3. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use." OPTION B: "I move to DENY Case No. MS-07-02, a request for approval of a two lot subdivision plat for property located at 3661 Miller Street for the following reasons: 1. Planning Commission MS-07-02Brothers ~ _ _ - a, _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ • ~ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ ~ ~.L ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ z ~ a~ ~ ~ I Uf A1CT A~l~ _ - a ~ ~ ~ LEGEN D ~ J I ~ I a~ ' PROPERTY LINE ; ~ RIGHT-OF-WAY . ~ 3 z „ EASEMENT -r - ~ I ~ r~) CURB AND GUTTER ~ ~ SET 4 REBAR W ~ # ~ I ~ CAP LS #23899 ~ i ; ~ SHEET 1 OF 1 NW GOR OF THE NE 9/4, NW COR OF THE NE COR. I SEC. 28, 13S, R69W, 6TH P,M, OF THE NE COR. SEC, 2$ ~ FND, #5 REBAR W/ T3S, R69W, 6TH P,M, NE GOR, SEC, 28 ~ T3S R69W T P,M ~ CAP LS #13212 FNO, 2-1/2 ALUM. ~ r 6 y ~ ' CAP 0 ~ER R FND. 3-1 4" BRASS CAP EBAR / ~ I STAMPED LS 1321 /N RANGE BOX LS 13212 # 2 # 1487. 73' 1 ~54, 44' I V ~ BASIS OF BEARINGS S$9'J2'43"W 264217' N LINE OF 1"HE NE COR, SEC 28 ~ , WESr 381H A l/ENUE ; ' 60' PUBUC R, 0. W. = r~_ _ ~ DEDICATION I (NOT PART OF THIS SURI/EY ~ ~ ~ ~ WE SANDRA L. A~THEN AND JANETH L. BRICHAM BEING TNE o) CONTAINING 0.570 ACRESt DESCRIBED AS FO~LOWS; ! , ~ ' 0 ~ ~ 1 ~ ; ~ ~ LEGAL ~ESCRIPTION Cl. ~ % ~ i ~ - - ~ 1 ~ ' ~ l A PARCE F L 0 LAND LaCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER ~ c.n / O s,_ ~ A - m DRAINAGE & ~ 28, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH P ~ I Ril ~ FLOOD CGNTROL ESMT. ~ COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE I ~ ! REC. N0. ~1029781 ~ ~ COMMENCING AT TNE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 28; 1 ~ ,I q l~;~y - ~ { ~ _ C-1 SAID SECTION 28, S89'12'43~~W, 1154,44' FEET TO A POIN d ~ 1 T B ~ NQr pAR (NOT PaRT OF THrs SuR~EY) THENCE SOO'15'18"E 283,25 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE , , , ~ ( r oF rH~s suR~Er~ , , „ . ~ p S$9 44 42 W, 25,00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY ~ ~ Q , o~~ - W~ UNPLATTED UNPLATI"ED BOOK 80$ AT PAGE 90~, 101, 102, SAID POINT BEING TNE P ~r -N c r~ Z h , , - RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S001518 E 175.41 FEET, THENCE LEAVI o 3 ~ ~ , I u~; 0 W ~ 589'12'SSW, 141,60 FEET TO THE WESTER Y o L v~ L LINE OF THE NC c~,l c~ ~i~ ~ ry ~ NORTHEAST AR ~ o I QU TER, THENCE AI.ONG SAID WESTERLY LINE f ~ " ~ ~ N89'12'S5"E 141,64 F ; Z c~ ~ EET TQ TNE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID HORACE HEIGHTS ' ~ (0,570 ACRES , MORE OR ~ESS, ~ o ~ SUBDI ~ISION 4 ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ R-2 ~ HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED SAID I.AND AS PE ~ I (NOT PART OF THIS SUR~EY) w ~ UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF "QALE LEWIS SUBDIVISION", ~ ~ o OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO AND BY THESE PRESENTS DO C ~ ~i ° j ~ AND MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND ~ /OR MUNICIPALLY FRANCHISED _ ~ I~ a PORTIONS OF RE~L PROPERTY SHOWN AS EASEMENTS FOR TI I ' ~ ~ OPERATION, MAIN~ENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT F R A ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~p i ~ ~ ~ ~ NOT ~IMITED TO TE~EPHONE AND ELECTRIC LiNES, GAS ~INES • r~ U ~ I.~ , I HYDRA ~u ~ ~ ~ NTS, STORM WATER SYST EMS AND PIPES, DETENTIQN F - ~ I o - ~ ~ APPURTENANCES THERETO, 0 i ~ Z ~ - ~u _ - I Z ~ _ i ~ R-1 p (NOT PART OF THIS 571R1/EY ~ W ( R-2 , ~ UNPLA TTED I (NOT PART OF THIS SUR I/EY - J ~ ~ SANDRA L, ALTHEN, CO-CONSERVATOR F R ~ 0 THE ESTATE OF ~ 1 ' ,t . . ~ ~ ~ - - ' ~ . , „ , ~ I uNP~A rTEo { ~ ~ S89 44 42 W 25. 00 ~ ; - _ _ W Y f ~ ~ ~ ~ TRUE POlN1' ~ L OF BEGINNING ~ L JANETH L, BRICHAM, CO-CONSERVATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF ~ ~1 -t " ~ ~ }Y 1 N89'12'S5"E 141.64' X ( MILLER COURT ~ ~ STATE OF COLORADO ~ CONDOS SUBOI~ISION I- -1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I R-2 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 10.0' UTI lTY ) (NOT PART OF THIS SURI/EY ~ 1 ~ ESM 1; THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEOGED BEFORE ME A,D. 2007 BY SANDRA L. ALTHEN AND JANETH BRICHAM, 1 ~ ` 10,0' UTILITY , c ESMT ~ ~ ~ MY COMMISSIQN EXPIRES ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 14,221 SQ. FT. p NOTARY ~ o o ~ 0.326 AC,t O I SEAL I ~ ~ , ~ Z ~ ^ t~ ~ - d' I 7~ ~ ~ ~ APPLEWOOD I~LLAGE t~ ~ , ~ ltj FRED S MINOR ~ ~i f~ SUBDll9SlON ~ ~ ~ w ~ SUBDI f/ISION _ _ _ _ ^ R-2 NOTARY PUBLIC ~ ~ R-2 ~ ~ ~ NpT PART ~ ~ I ,~11 V ( OF THIS SUR ~EY~ , ~ ~ BASIS F ~ 0 BEARINGS ~ ~ ~ ~ _ > » - ~l m f ~ .~9'1~ 5~ ~41~~ , ~ ~ > W~ BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF TNE NORTHEA~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~I~ I SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPA~ MERIDIAN, E Y O 5,0' UTILITY ~ 2642.17' FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 3-1 4" BRASS CAP IN RA~ V i ~ ~ a ~ ESMT ~ ~ CORNER OF SECTION 2$ AND A FOUND 5 REBAR WITN ALUMI HORACE HEIGNTS Z » ~ # a~ FND. 1 IR~N PIPE I BOX AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 28 BASED ON ~ ~ SUBDI~ISION fl,7' NORTH OF LOT NETWORK. R_~ CORNER + _ _ _ r ,i ~ n NOT PART OF THIS SUR!/EY ~ , ~ > 10 oi ~ ~ UTILITY EASEMENT STATEMENT ~ o ~ ~ i a ~ ~ LOT 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ 10,620 SQ. F"T, ~ TEN-FOOT (10' WIOE UTIUTY EASEMENTS ARE HER Y ~ ) EB GRANTI 0,244 AC.t TO AL~ PUBLIC STREETS AND FRONT AND REAR PROP ~ ~ r ERTY l.l~ ~ OR PLATTED AREA, FIVE-FOOT 5~ WI ( ) DE EASEMENTS ARE HER ~ ~ ~ ADJAC N I FRED'S MIN R E T TO A~L SiDE LOT LINES OF EACH LOT IN TNE SUBD .1 - t "1 ~ EASEMENTS ARE DE01 AT F i~^ SUBDII/ISION C ED OR THE INSTALLATION MAINTENAI ~ GAS, TELEVISION CABLE DRAINAG A E ND TELECOMMUNICATIONS ~ I ~ S89'12 55"W 141.60 R-2 P , ~ 5.0 UTIUTY ERMITTED WITNIN ANY ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE STRI - (NOT PART OF THIS SUR~EY~ STRUCTUR ~ I I ESML ES AND WATER METFRS SHA~ i NnT RF PFR~,I1TTFtl U J _ _ . . . . . , . • d~ r~ ...~niv v ~ iu i i ~nJGIYiGV 1 J, (D HoRa cE HEIcH rs z -c SUBDI ~ISION R-2 REV. JULY 11, 2007 p 0 R-1 (NOT PART OF THIS SURVEY~ MAY 25, 2007 f= (NOT PART OF THIS SUR I/ ~ EY~ I Q~ ~ UNPL A TTED I MARTIN / MARTIN ~ u , ~ I p ~ I CON5ULTING ENGINF_ER5 O~ Q ~ Eo CASE HISTORY U~ a~ I° c~ 30 15 0 30 60 z z ~ - 1 2499 WEST COLFAX AVE. SCALE 1„= 30' o ~ o MS_O~_O~ P.O. Box 151500 LAKEWOOp, CO B021 5 303.431.6100 FAX 303.431.4028 3661 MILLER STREET MINOR PLAT\19748,C,85\SHEET 1 OF 1 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: August 2, 2007 CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: Case Nos. WA-07-04/WS-07-01/WF-07-01/Crown Land Dev. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of an 11 lot major subdivision with a cul-de-ac length vaziance and a Class I special exception floodplain permit in R-1 zoning LOCATION OF REQUEST: Approx. 3301 Quail Street NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): Crown Land Development APPROXIMATE AREA: 9.14 acres PRESENT ZOIVING: R-1, Residential-One PRESENT LAND USE: Vacant property ENTER INTO THE RECORD: (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) CASE FILE AND PACKET MATERIALS (X) DIGTI'AL PRESENTATION Planning Commission 1 Case No. WA-07-04/WS-07-01/WF-07-01/ Crown Land Dev. J UH15ll11;'1'lUN: 11 The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have beei met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to heaz this case. 1. REQiTEST The property owner requests approval of an eleven-lot major subdivision on 9.14 acres of property located at approlcimately 3301 Quail Street. The property in question is zoned R-1, Residential-One. (Exhibit 1, applicant letter) The property was platted as Lot 2 of the Applewood Baptist Church (ABC) subdivision plat which was approved by Planning Cominission on October 19, 2006. The subdivision divided the 14 acres into two lots. (Extribit 2, ABC Subdivision plat) A condition was included in the approval that parkland assessment be deternuned at the time of development of I.ot 2(reaz lot). R-1 zoned property abuts the pazcel on all sides. Adjacent land uses include single family residential to the east, vacant property to the west with single family residential beyond. The Applewood Baptist Church education building and property abut the parcel to the south and Lena Gulch defines the northern property line. There is a I.ena Gulch tributary which traverses the~roperty having a basin beginning on the south side of 32"a Avenue in Lakewood, continuing under 32" Avenue through an adjacent pazcel and entering the property at the very southeast corner. This tributary moves across the property in a northwestern direc6on until iYs confluence with the Gulch. The northwest portion of the property is encumbered b}" 100-year flood plain. This existing floodplain line is best depicted on page 4 of the plan set. (Exhibit 3, Quail Hollow Subdivision) The original property as platted has no direct street frontage, rather a 25' wide access easement to 32°a Avenue through Lot 1 of the ABC Subdivision. In order to provide access to a public street, a previously platted property which has direct frontage on Quail Street has been included in the subdivision. This parcel is owned by private individuals who are a party to the application. In order for the subdivision to be approved, the following must occur in the oTder listed: 1. Granting of the variance to the maximum cul-de-sac length. (A three fourths vote of the members present is needed to approve a variance.) If this request is approved, then the following must occur. 2. Approval of an 11-lot major subdivision plat. If this request is approved then the following ►nust occur: 3. Approval of a Class I special excepfion to the floodplain to allow street and other subdivision iinprovements. (A three fourths vote of the members present is needed to approve a variance.) ~ . Planning Commission Case No. WA-07-04/WS-07-O1/WF-07-O1/ Crown Land Dev. H. AGENCY REFERRALS The proposal was referred to all of the appropriate city depaztments and outside agencies. All responding agencies have indicated that they can serve the property and the applicant will bear the cost of installing improvements to the property. Wheat Ridge Public Works: Is in the process of reviewing a final drainage report and plan. A CLOMR will be required prior to any improvements to the 100-yeaz floodplain and the Lena Gulch stream channel. A Class I floodplain impact report has been submitted and is under review. Traffic generation information has been submitted with the conclusion that there will be minimal impact to Quail Street (azound 120 trips per day). Wheat Ridge Police Department: No issues. Consolidated Mutual Water District: Can serve the property subject to rules and regulations of the district. Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District: Has an existing sanitary sewer main in Quail Street and another main on the south side of I.ena Gulch. A connection will be required to serve the property from the mainline adjacent to I.ena Gulch. There appears to be some question relative to the existing easement and line location which must be resolved. Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District: The installation of at least one hydrant will be required at a half-way point into the subdivision. During the construction phase, at least two ways must be provided into the subdivision. The existing 25' wide easement through the church property will be adequate for secondazy access. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District: UDFCD is in the process of completing a new master plan and floodplain delineadon study for Lena Gulch. An approved CLOMR will be required prior to any modification of the exisdng I,ena Gulch drainage way and land encumbered by 100-yeaz flood plain on the site. Xcel Energy: Has requested their standard easement language which has been included on the plat cover sheet. III. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Neighborhood meetings aze not required for subdivision applications. However, the applicant held one on January 3, 2007, to discuss the proposal with the azea property owners. Nine azea residents were in attendance (Exhibit 4, Sign Up Sheet). IV. SUBDIVISION DESIGN The plat will subdivide the property into 10 new lots to be developed with single family structures. All lots meet or exceed the R-1 minimum lot size of 12, 500 s.f. and lot width of 100'. The subdivision includes an existing pazcel on Quail Street s a portion of that lot can be purchased and used for street access to Quail. The lot from which the land will be removed has Planning Commission Case No. WA-07-04/WS-07-O1/WF-07-O1/ Crown Land Dev. an existing single family residence on it. The property acquisition will not reduce the lot below the R-1 development standazds for lot size and width. A new street called W. 33`d Drive will be extended west from Quail Street for access into and through the subdivision. It is a full-width dedicated local street with 50' of width. Curb, gutter and sidewalk will be installed on both sides of the street. There aze several tracts shown on the plat. Tract A encompasses the I.ena Gulch drainage way and the portion of land encumbered by 100-year floodplain. Tract B at the southeastern corner of the property will be utilized as a landscaped enuance feature and will be maintained by the homeowners' association. Tract C will funcuon as a detention pond and will be maintained by the homeowners' associadon. An exisfing detention easement which was platted with the original ABC subdivision is not required for detention anymore and is being vacated by this document. A representative from the church will be signing the mylaz to acknowledge the vacauon before mylar recording. Staff is somewhat concerned regarding the potential for I.ot 1 of ABC Subdivision to develop residentially. In December of 2006 the Applewood Baptist church was denied their request for SUP to allow expansion of the existing education building and parking improvements. Since then, there have been inquiries about the potenual`for the vacant portion of that lot to be split off and developed into single family homes. As such, Staff is requiring reservation of a 50' wide stub at the southeastern corner of I.ot 10 from W. 33`d Drive to the southern subdivision boundary for future public sueet access to allow for a future extension of a public street system into this azea. This reservafion needs to be reflected on page 2 of the plan set. On-site drainage When raw land is developed, historic drainage coming into and being released from the site must be maintained. Because the minor tributary to Lena Gulch has historically crossed the property, the developer must continue to accommodate its flows. The tributary is being lefr in.its current location and made an amenity to the site as it runs along the common boundaries between several lots. It will be located in a 40' drainage easement and will be maintained by the HOA. Please see the "Creek Secdon ImprovemenY" section detailed on page 4. The developer had explored the feasibility of relocating this water feature against the eastern property line but this design required a great deal of fill dirt to be brought in. There will be two street culvert crossings of the tributary as it travels through the subdivision. Much of the on-site flow drains to the street gutter and to the proposed storm sewer located before the second stream crossing and into a water quality structure before ultimately releasing into the tributary. Flows from lots 6 and 7 and undeveloped Tract A will flow into Lena Gulch. Additional flows and historical offsite flows will run across the southern boundary of the subdivision to a pond located in Tract C at the southwest corner of the site and then released into an existing storm sewer which flows to L,ena Gulch. The portion of the site designated as Tract A is encumbered with 100-yeaz floodplain. It is the intent of the developer to file a CLOMIZ (Conditional Letter of Map Revision) with FEMA to Planning Commission 4 Case No. WA-07-04/WS-07-O1/WF-07-O1/ Crown Land Dev. allow modification of I.ena Gulch to attempt to reclaim addiuonalland for development. Once a CLOMR is approved, the portion of Tract A south of the existing gulch will be resubdivided into three additional lots. The developer will then improve I.ena Gulch to contain flood waters currenUy impacting the portion to the south to allow for the extra three lots. A separate minor subdivision process shall be required for this resubdivision. Staff has requested specific language to be added to front sheet of the plat as follows: "Tract A is to remain a non-buildable tract until such time as a LOM12 revising the 100-yeaz floodplain limits is approved. The maintenance of Tract A shall remain the responsibility of the HOA until the time of further development " - The City of Wheat Ridge in conjunction with Urban Drainage and Flood Control District is in the process of adopting a new Flood Hazazd Delineation Plan for I.ena Gulch. This document will not be adopted by the City until the fall of 2007. The plan shows a channelizadon scenario for the gulch but it is not the section proposed by the developer. This altemate improvement plan will be reviewed by FEMA through the CLOMR process. Parkland dedication The parks and recreation commission aze asking for fees in lieu of dedication. V. VARIANCE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 26-416.C.2. of the Subdivision Regula[ions, the center point of a cul-de-sac bulb shall not be longer than 500' between it and the center point of the intersecting street. In this case, Quail is the street that intersects with W. 33d Drive and the measurement to the center of the cul-de-sac bulb is 90438', requiring a variance of 404.38'. (Exhibit 5, Applicant letter) This provision is in place primarily to address emergency access issues and to encourage an integrated public street system instead of a series of unconnected cul-de-sac bulbs. Staff would point out that there are other cul-de sac bulbs in the immediate vicinity that exceed the 500' limitation. Those would include Routt Street extending north of 32"d Avenue (650'), Quail Street extending north from 33`d Avenue (570') and Quail Street extending south from 38t' Avenue (780'). Alternative circulation and access scenarios for the site were explored. Those alternauves included extending 33'd Drive west to the western property line and creation of a sueet south to align with Robb Circle on the south side of 32"d Avenue. There are grade differences and an existing storm sewer line located between the east side of the Applewood Baptist and the property to the west which precludes a public street at this location. Another alternative would be to extend W. 33'd Avenue to the west to connect to W. 33rd Avenue extending east from Routt as platted in the Applewood Brookside Subdivision. There is a vacant connecting pazcel owned by a different property owner who would have to participate to accomplish this. This property owner is not interested in having a sueet connection through his property. Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a vaziance request. City Council shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which the applicant ` demonstrates a majority of the following criteria have been met: Planning Commission 5 Case No. WA-07-04/WS-07-O1/WF-07-O1/ Crown Land Dev. A. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in wluch it is located. The property can still be used if the variance is not granted. However, the resulting subdivision design would impact the drainage way traversing the property. B. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. Staff has concluded that granting of the variance would not alter the chazacter of the azea. There aze several cul-de-sacs serving subdivisions in the vicinity which exceed 500' in length. Applewood Knolls 1e Filing Subdivision was platted in 1975. The Applewood Brookside Subdivision to the west where Routt Street is 675' long was platted in 1983. The 500' cul-de-sac restriction has been in the subdivision regulations since original adoption in 1972. Alternate designs were cost prohibitive based on grade, natural water features, utility challenges or intervening property. C. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with tlus application, which would not be possible without the variance. The property can be developed whether or not the variance is granted. However, the developer has strived to take advantage of the natural features on the site and made them an amenity. This may not occur if the cul-de-sac variance is denied. D. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. There aze unique challenges with the property due to the pass through tributary to I.ena Gulch which must be accommodated. Alternative designs included the rerouting of this drainage way against the eastern property line, shortening the length of the street. Staff believes this design which required a great deal of fill dirt to be brought in would have had a greater impact toxhe homes on Quail Sueet. E. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The difficulty has been in designing a project with appropriate access to a public street. Differences in grade, existence of utilities and intervening property ownership have precluded other designs. F. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in wluch the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate ~ Planning Commission Case Nos. WA-07-04/ WF-07-01/ WS-07-O1/Crown Land Dev. ~ use or development of adjacenf property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of ffre or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. Granting of the variance should not impair the amount of light and air to adjacent properties. The longer cul-de-sac will not result in congestion in the public streets. The fire district has reviewed the design and has concerns only about the construction phase in that an alternate access through I.ot 1 of the ABC Subdivision be provided. G. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. There aze other nonconforming cul-de-sacs in the azea; therefore, this request is not unique to the property. H. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Approval of the vaziances would not result in the accommodadon of a person with disabilities. 1. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design ManuaL Low density residential development is not subject to the requirements of the Architectural and Site Design Manual. Staff has requested specific language to be added to front sheet of the plat as follows: VI. CLASS I SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT The floodplain regulations recognize two types of exception pernuts. A Class I pernut is for construction of non-habitable structures such as sheds and fences or for the placement of fill or deposition of material. Class II exception permits aze required for structures for human occupancy. The applicant must receive approval of a Class I Special Exception Pernut to allow street and other subdivision improvements in the I.ena Gulch 100-year floodplain. The applicant has submitted a report which analyzes the impact of the improvements on the 100- yeaz floodplain. The flood plain administrator is in the processing of reviewing this report. VII. RELATED CORRESPONDENCE Attached is conespondence received from an adjacent property owner to the east. (Exhibit 6, I.etter) l VIII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMIVIENDATIONS Planning Commission Case Nos. WA-07-04/ WF-07-O1/ WS-07-0 1/Crown Land Dev. Staff concludes that the drainage report and flood plain analysis are still in the process of being ' reviewed. Because these documents might nnpact the subdivision design, a recommendafion of continuance to the September 6, 2007 Planning Commission meeting is given. IX. RECOMNIENDED MOTION "I move that Case Nos. WA-07-04/WS-07-0 1/WF-07-0 1, requests for approval of an 11 lot major subdivision with a cul-de-ac length variance and a Class I special exception floodplain pernut in R-1 zoning for property located at approximately 3301 Quail Street, be continued until the September 6, 2007 Planning Commission meeting." ` Planning Commission 8 Case Nos. WA-07-04/ WF-07-O1/ WS-07-O1/Crown Land Dev. CROWN LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC P.O. Boz 5148 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-5148 (303) 233-4483 February 21, 2007 Community Development Staff CITY OF WIIEAT RIDGE 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 Re: Letter of Request Indicating Full Intent and Purpose Proposed Development at 33rd and Quail Ladies and Gentlemen: Thank you for taking the time to consider and make comments on the proposed development at 33rd and Quail. Location: The subject property is Lot #2 of the Applewood Baptist Church Subdivision. Access: Dr. Macarthur Hill has agreed to join Lot 6B, Lot 5 and 10' of Lot 4 ofthe Applewood Knolls, Filing 12 in this replatting, to allow the use of a portion of his property for aceess from 33rd and Quail. Proposed Development: We would like to subdivide into 14 R-1 single family home sites. Roadways: The eactension of 33rd Avenue on the east side ofthe property would enter the subdivision as a single entry point. Flood Plain: The northem approximate 2 acres of the subdivision is within the 100-yeaz Lena Gulch flood plain. It is our intention to discuss options to improve the Gulch in hopes of recovering a portion of the 2 acres. Open Space Dedication: We would consider dedicating some portion of the property within the flood plain to the City of VJheat Ridge. Again, thank you for taking the time to review and make comments on the proposed project. I look forward to meeting with you to discuss the future use of the proper[y. If you need to get in touch with me, please contact me at 303-233-4483 (office) or 303-807-0350 (cell phone). Yours tnily, (Steven . McKendry (\=~r~~ _ EXHIBIT 1 r r L I PORi1f1N CF 1R/.CT 12 BROOKADE SV90IN510N vI ~~m i LOT 6 'f , SCKL t•~ S010' PSfA UiN1iT X00'11'SJ~W ' PEC 1p N~3300T N0991'lYE 121.33' J.49• _ ~ %50.~ ~ ~ ~ - = 30'!i'SYW anu, a ' wru~w. T35, R6iW. BM P.N. . Gv. wc. N iHD. S-1/Y AkU1l. CAV LS 24%2. 1991. IN RIJIGE BOX II F II ~ I I ~ FND 5/8- RFBM ~W/ALUM, CAP CeP mo 56 E S qMN11tS ! y~--- ~a ++o~. !o' UTUiY EAYllMT . ~ i~ - •1L - - - - - - T K~S /Sn~ PCATqi OF lflACi 12 IN BROaK90E SUBDINSION I ZONEO R-1 APPLMWV V!V nw T CHr/Ptw • SUBDPIg" A SUBOIMSION PLAT QF. TRACT 22 AND THE W-1/2 OF TRACT 21. BROOKSIOE SUBDIVfS10N, LOCATEO tN THE NW-1/4 OF SfCTiON 28, T01MtStNP 3 SOUTH, RANCE 69 MlEST, 6TH PRiNqPAI MERIDIAN qTY OF WHEAT RIOGF. CWNTY OF .EFF€RSON. STATE OF COLORADO SMEET 2 OF 2 I I I I ~{P LEYOOV KNOLlS 12TN FILIMG I I lOT i I LOT 2 I lOT J I LQi a ~ lAT 5 I ~ED P-t i~0' REB/V I I I - . I I wT~xO4 II / WA. CAP ENGR. LS a]e ..N0010'58'W% . h / W SFMTARY SENEN . ' k110111019 Am aTCH EASEAIENT 1 SEE hAT NOIE \ W. 9]9. Pc. 108 . . ~ ~ I \ 1i` iB' BR.qN+1.6E k J+ _ - umim c~wekr ~ _ _ _ Y ~ < LEt1A GUldl voRi~ON OP mnCT n ^ BROOKSIDE SUBDINSION N ZONfD R-1 ~ ~~[55 ANO NNIITENMlCE _ ql €ASEMENT , - . . ~ . xc c. ro. rozoes. ~ I m 1RACT B ~ enNZxu suaoinsou I ZONFD R-i ry 16' SANIipRT SEM£R r I EASEMfNT - y BK, 1616. Po. ,158 ~ PIXtilql OF iRACT 10 BROqI SU9oiV15fON ZONED ft-1 t. 500'J~'S~t 137.2 ~ l r' 50o'JJ'14'E 8.20' \ ~ 7 -z~ ' ~[ru aka \ yV1~ f N 100 YEM FLOOD ZONE (SEE PLAT NOIE 21) - f 08\ / N$\ \ ~ ~mN~\,\.oi 16' SAMTMT SLMEF EASEYENT 1 YBKI. 98i, W. 5!0 _N89Y5Y1"E / _ t'~a• 181.5Y SW3+33"E I6.00 iD 5/8- REBAR /GlASTC CAP IUY ~ ~1Q ~ Er"'s~ EXHIBIT 2 LOT 2 313.100 SV. Ft. ir 1ws rUi S Ar ~ - - - ' -~5003314' 1 ~~~asw \ $I \ u 500'3a'33"E n ~ I E~9fLENT Fqt LOT ] N5920'W'E ~ IMi~1ES5/EffiE55 J N0031'S)'W .IO.W' Hpg~p1YYE 118.6T ' I I FORMMY . . 59.H' N00'ISJ.JB' 'n I \ ~ ~ ~ - yql~ < N ~"1 I N~na+ a R.O.W. vAcanro nT liEL N0. 93153173 I UTWtt ENSEMENi pESERVEO-. m ~ I I F I 10' PSfA VAUtt ~ ~ LOT 1 ~ I u~ 298,200 Sq. Ft acc xo: ~i z~~5wl ~ I ~ FHO s/e' xcsnR p"4 I . . I~. w/ a~asnc cecL$ 34584 ~ ~-wyg•¢ I 50073'14"E -~IB.6T--_-T-'_ _ _ 8.~' . t291.08' - ' 1RW $CD'3S14~E I t2.00 ' . ~ .I . m e me e~2 ' ' , io onrmMr.a e ~Im unuttcRm,q+r I 5Er nJe' Keut ' . . 16.25' 10' WMMAGE EA5£MFH T V/ PLASIIC CAP P00.Tp1 Ci TR.ICT 21.. U1111TY EA4OilfllT \ PIXtnON OF IPACT'21 L$ N5W " , + . ' EEE MT N01E 10 PEC. W. MI19721 BROd(90E 91BDINSION . 9ROOM550E. SV901N90N r.. ZIXkV N-1 ZONEO A-1 I ~ I W I~ N I~ m p IZ 7b, n n.o.w. y fN0 1' BRA55 LAC Ls xses, iowc . . bo ri souTn a . MHNCi1 P0.SIPON) I I ~ W-1/4 CaR. SEC. 20 . - I 1J5I. R69W, 6Ti P M. vHO. z-i/x' qLUM CAP LS 24982. 1991, IN RPNQ BO% _ _ CASE HISTORY ~ ~ n MS-06-07 ~ V WF-07-01 WA-07-04 ~~~u ci a~ni~~icin~i nR~n ws-o7-o~ A I HU IN _ - ' ~ , ~ ► . 9 ~ McARTHUR HILL, BEiNG THE OV4~lERS OF THE REAL PROPERTY ~.1449 ~ ~ ; , WE CROWN LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: , PPLEWOOD ~APTIST CH~JRCN SUBDIVISION, A SUBDiVISION RECORDED AT ° A PARCEL OF LAND BEING LOT 2, A ~T~ 200.Q0 FEET 621 AND LOT 5, THE SOUTH FEET OF LQ 4, AND THE NO RECEPTION NUMBER 20~6142 , T BOOK 49 PAG~ 11, ALL NQLLS 12TH FILING A SUBQIVISIOf~ RECORDED AT PLA 1. BASIS OF ~EARI~lG~: T~IE SOUTH LlNE Q~ THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2~, TC OF LOT 6, APPLEWOOD K ~ RANGE 69 W~S~ Q~ THE 6TH f'•M.~ NORTNWEST QUARTER ~F SECTION 28, T(3~1VSNIF 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WE,>>, fl~ THE 6TN PRINClPAL MER►61AN BEARS S 8919 55 W AS LOCATED IN THE F~ ~1 AN~ MORE PARTI~ULARLY DESCRIBc~ AS WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JE~FERSON, STATE OF ,,OLORAD , SHOWN HEt~~~?N, AND A~ SHOWN ON THE CITY RIGHT 0~ WAY & RE~~REN~~ CITY OF FOLLQWS: 2. ALL DfMENSfO~iS SNOWN HEREON RRE IN FEET. ALL BEARINGS SH~E~N HERI GS G~NTAINED HEREIN A~~: BA~ED UPON THE ASSUMPTIQ~ THAT THE S~UTFi DEGREE-MI~VUTES--SECONDS. BASIS OF BEARINGS: ALI. BEARIN PTER O F S E C T i O N 2 8, B E A Ru S S 9 i 9 5 5 W, A N D M O N U M~ N T E D A S F O L L O W S: L I N E O F T H E N O R T H W E S 7 Q U A 3. D A T E O F P R E P A R A T I O U; D E C E M B E K 9, 2 0 0 6. ~ F SEGTION 28 ~EING A kOUND 3-1/4" BRASS CAP, LS 24~62, IN RANG~ ~UX. -THE CENTER QUARTER CQR~ER 0 4, ANY PERSO~ ~lHO KNOWINGLY REMOV~'S, ALTERS OR DEFACE5 ANY PU~LIC OF SECfiON 28 BEING A F~;~ND 3--1/4" ~RASS CAP, LS 2~962, IN RANGE BGX. MONUMENT CR l_AND SURVEY 80USJDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSOR GOME~II -THE WEST QUARTER CORNER kllSDEMEA~iCR r 1J~~t,~A~aT T~ STATE ~TA IUE 18-4-508, ~.R.S. ta - r~- C~IMENCING AT SAID CEN?~t~ QUARTER OF SECTION 28; 5. NOTICE: ACCGR~IC~G 70 COLORhDO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ~~Y L~EGA " " !D SCtJTH LINE OF THE P~~~TH4UE~T QUARTER, A DISTA~GE (~F 7475.77 F~'~?`; ANY DEFECT EN TNiS SURVEY WITNIN TNREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRS7 DISCOVI THENCE S 8919 55 W ALON~ SA EVENT ~IAY ANY AGT~ON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THlS SURVE4 C~M~ C .00 FEET TO Ti~ S~UTI~EAST CORNER OF LuT 1, 5AI~} APPLEW~,'=v~ YEARS FROM ~F~lE DATE UF CERTIFICATiON SHQWN HEREON. THENCE N 00 30 56 W, A DIS iANCE 0~ 22 BAPTIST CHURCH SUBnIVISION; 6. FLOOD ZONE LIMITS ARE SHOWN ACCORDiNG TO THE FEMA FLOOGs ?~SURAP ~ Ri'~ C NCE QF 6G~.~~ FE~ i TO THE JEFFERSON CQI~NTY, COLORADO AND INCORPORATED AREAS, MAP N~,~~~ER Of THENCE N 00 30 56 W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF S,, LOT 1, A DI..,TA AT JUNE 17 2003. THE PROPER°~~" N~R iH T~: NUMBER 08059C0194-E 60TH D ED , ~ S O U T H E A S T C O R N E R O F S A I D L O T 2 A N G T H E P~ l N ~ G I N N I N G, H V I N G B A ~ L O O C ZONE-AE aF THE 100 YEAR FLOOD HAZARD ARER, AND A t ~STERLY LlNE, NQF ~"W~R~.'i LINE AND EA5TERLY L~h~~ ~AID LG~ ~ REMAINQE~ TNt SU!~JECT PROPE~TY, 1NCLUDING THE SOUTHERN ~.I~S THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE, , WHlCH !S OU~Sl~E QF T~~ 10G-Y~iR ~~OOD I~AZARD AREA. THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COt;RSES, ~ 7. THIS SUR~~Y GOE~ ~l~T CONSTI1l1TE A TITLE SEARCH BY JeHN ~P~GINEERIP _ 1) S 8919 56 W, A DISTANCE OF 4~~,.70 FEE OWNERSHIP iHiS ~~1~CEL, RIGNT'~ OF WAY, EASEMENTS, AND ENC~'~BRANi 2) N 00'34'33" W, A DISTANCE OF 696.05 FEET; ~ASED UPON A TITLE POLICY BY e____~_____ ORDER NO_..~.~~~__ 3) N 89'15'27" E, A DISTANCE OF 4~3.43 FEET; A DISTANCE OF 432.56 FEET TO THE Ia~ORTHI~EST COP,NER OF SAID SGUTH ;0 FEET C~F i.c~T 4, 4) S 0030 56 E, 8. ALL L0~ ~ORfil~F~ ~~Nl1M~.NTS SHRLL BE SET PER GOLORADO STAT~ STAT~ APPLEWOOD KNOLLS, i2TN FILING; 9. SHADING I°sV~ICRTES T~!AT PORTICN 0~ T~iE QETENTION EASEMEPlT SN~WN '23'04" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF S~fD SOJTH 10 FEET OF LOT 4, A a15TANCE OF ~17.57 BAPTIST CNl1RCH SUBDiV4Si0N VACATED WITH TNIS PLAT. . THENCE N 89 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; . 10. JEHN E~GiNEERii~G, INC. HAS M~DE NO INVESTiGATION OR INDEt ENDENT E S 00°27'44" E ALONG THE EASTERLY LWE OF SA6.~ SOUTH 10 FEET OF LOT 4, SAlD LOT 5, AND SAID DETERMINE f~~dNERSi-f1P ~'r~lS TRfiCT OR ~`Q VERIFY EASEMENTS R~C~~tDED THENC ~ FEET OF LOT 6 APPLEWOOD KN~LLS, 12TH FIi.;~NG, A DISTANCE OF 310.00 FEET Tq THE SO~TH~AST ENCUMBRANCE~, r~~STR;CTIVE COVEhANTS OR ANY ~THER FACTS TNA i AN Ai NORTH 200 CORNER OF SAID NORTH 200 FEET OF LOT 6; TITLE POLIC~ MAY DiS~LOSE, J~~ TNENCE S 89'23~04" W ALONG ~-iE SO~THERLY LINE OF S~~D NORTH 200 FEET OF LOT 6, A DiSTANCE G~ 11. THE SUBu~vi PROP~~RTY lS ZO~D R-1 ~RESIDENTIAL-ONE) ACGG~DI~G 1 177.28 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1, APPLEWOOD BAPT1ST CHU~(~H StJ~DfVISION; RIDGE. NCE N 00'30'56~~ W ALONG SAID E~STERLY LINE, A DI~~ANCE OF 45.87 FEET TO T~iE NORTHEAST CGR~ER OF 12. THE STO~M DETEN~i~N AREA H[REIN SHQW~~ AS TRACT C, AND A~L CRA THE I LOT 1 AND THE POINT ~ 9EGINNING; SHOWN AS LYiNG tiNITI-IiN A DRAINRCE EASEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRU~~ED AP SA D OWNER AND SU~SEQUE~;~f QWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSiGh1S. eN TN CONTAINING 398 353 S.F. OR 9.1449 ,~CRES, MORE OR LE~S. CONSTRUCTIO~ AND ~iAlidTENANCE 15 NC}T PERF'`~RMED BY SAID OWiVE~, THE , SHALL HAVE ~HE R!GNT T~ ENTFR aUCH AREAS AND PERFORM THE NErESS~ AT~ED SAID LAND A~ ~~R THE DftA1h~NG HEREON CO~TAE~#ED UNDER THE WNICH SAI[l ~}'~YNER, ~i~IRS, ~UCCES~>OF~S, i~N(~ AaSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO ~ . F~ • HAVE LAID OUT, SUBQIVIDED R~D PL i ~ + E AND STYLE OF QUAIL HOLLOW ~t1HDIVISION> A RESI~~DiJlSI~N OF A PART OF Th~E ~,ITY ~F WHEAT ,,.~G~, PERMANENT S~RIJG~~.~RES SHALL BE CQNSTRUCiED !N TNE DETENTION DR NAM RADO AND BY THESE PRESENTS ~(7 DEDICATE TO TFi~ CITY Or WHExT RIDGE AN~ T~~ PU9~.IC THOS~ AND NO CNANGES ~t~ ALTERATIONS A~FECTlNG TNE HYDRAULIC CHARACT~~IC COLO ~ !T'( OF ~ ~ PPROVAL QF TI PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY ~NOv~iv AS RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND ~0 FURTHER DEDICATE 20 ~i~E C t~R DRAINAG~ CH,~NN:.L AREAS ~ILL ~E MADE NIITHOUT THE A ~ Y OWNED AND OR M~f~ICr AL! Y FRANCHISED UTILITIES A~~ SERVICE~ THG~t WORKS, WHEAT RIDGE AND THOSE MllNICIPAL~ / ~ PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHG',NP~ AS EASEMENTS F0~ TNE CONSTRUC110N, INSTALLAI~O~, ~~ERATI0~4, AIR ANd REPLACEMENT FOR AL~. SERVlG~S. TNIS INCLUDES BUT IS NQT ~If~I~D TO TELEPHONE 13. STREET RIGNT-OF-I~AY MONUM~NTS SHALL BE SET PRIOR TO FI~4;~1. LiF'? MAIP~TENANCE, REP , T BY Ths ~I~Y C AND ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LIPJESa ~VATEt~ AND SANITARY S~~NER ~INES, HYDRANTS, STG~M ~lA~E~ SYSTEM.~ ~~lD MONUMENT ~iARDWARE f~ND RANGE BOXES WILL BE PROVIDED PIPES DETENTION PONDS STREE~ LIGi~TS AND ALL APPU~aFNA~CES THERETO. REQUEST, , , 14, - TRACT ~ IS FGR OPEN SPA~ AND TO BE MAINTAINED BY TN~ ~QMEC - TRA~~ C lS FOR ST~RM WATER DETENTION AND 4PEN SPACE IS ' BY T~E HOM~(~W~E~S ASSOCIATI~N, 15. Xi.EL ~Ne~G`~ ~.~S~M~N~' NO~~E: EIGN?-FOOT (8') WIDE DRY-UTiL3TY EASf GRANTED ON PRli~1AiE r~Rt~PERTY A)JACENT TO THE FRONT AND REAR LOT L STEVEN S. McKENDRY, MANAGER I~cARTHUR 0. HILL, OWivER iHE SUBDIVIvI~N. iN ADDiTION, EiGFT-FOOT (8'j WI~E DRY-UTILITY EA~~MEN 3345 QUAfL ST. TS P~RC~:L~ A CROWN LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC AROUND THE PERIME~ER QF PLATT[D AREAS INCLUDING TRAC ~NHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 AREAS. TNE~c ~AS~ME~TS ARE RESERVED FQR THE lNSTALLATION, M~(NTENA F ELECTRIC uP,~ TELEViSiCl~l CA~E, AND TELEGOMMUNICATIONS FACII~ITIES. O p f AND WATER MET~RS SHALL NOT BE PE~MITTED WITHIN SAID UTILIT'~ ERSEMEP 16, CITY 4F WNEA;~ ~!DG~ EASEME~T NOTE: TEN-FOOT (10'} WIDE ~RSEMENI ON PRIVATE PROF'E~TY ADJACENT '0 Al_L FU~LIC STREETS AND FR~N~ AN~ LEILA J. HILL, OUVNER , OF EACH LOT IN T~?E SUBDl~lSION )R ~'LATTED AREA. FIVE-FOOT (5') IMDE 3345 QUAIL ST. GRANTED ON ~RIVATE PROPERTY A)JR{;ENT TO A~L SIDE LOT LINES EACI . ~ WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 . i HE5E EASEMEIITS ,~RE DEDICATED FOR THE INS?,4LnLATlC ~ OR PLATTED AREfi , ~ REPLACEMENT QF E~.~ECTRI~, GAS, ~LE~~~SiQN C~,B'_E, DRAINAGE AND T~~EC~I y IJTILITIES S~iA~L A; SC ~E PERMITTFJ t~'!THiN ANY ACCESS EASEME~TS AND F SUBDIVISION. ~'ER~iAE~~~T ~T~UC7U;E5 AND WAT~R M~'Tc.RS SHALL NOT BE F STATE OF COLORADO ) UTILITY EASEME~vTS. r )SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ~E THIS DAY OF x A.D., 2007, BY STEVEN S. McKENDRY A~ MANAGER OF CROWN ~.AND DEVELOPMENT, ~LC. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL ~EALa MY COMMISSION EXPiRES: i THE DETENTION E~S~M~~?~ AS SUP:RSEDED ~Y ~iHiS PLAT AND A~ ~HO~'~~ 0 APPLEWOOC~ ~APTIS`~ Ci~J~CH aUBIIViS10N, REGORDED IN JEFFERSO~~ ~~;OUNTI 2006142621, 1S FIERE~`f VACATED ~HIS .a..~___._._~__ DAY QF NOTARY PUBLIC DAVID LLOYD TRUSTEE, APPL~W00? ~APTIST GHURCH~ , - a~. ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ _ } STATE OF COLORADO ) _ SS I, CHRISTO~'N~~ ~i. `+~c~LVAIN; DO F_REBY C~RTIFY THAT THE SURVEY 0~ TH ) ON SUBDIVISION Va'AS M~D~ ME QR JNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION A~i~ TO COUNTY OF JEFFERS ) ir,i~nQe~e-~n~~ er~n E~;= i~ arrn~nn~rF wiTN A~ ~ APPI If'.ARI F f;(~I~RAl~O ~ l ❑i vmnviv neev u..~~ vvv.v...... . . . _ t7"1')MCCCRI°F"C C All1 Z'I iD1/CV ~ I - mr-- EDITION AS AMENDPD, TriE ACCOMfANYiNG PLAT ACCURATELY REPRESEPdTS ; THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF A.D., 2007, BY McARTHUR 0. HILL AND LEILA J. HILL AS OWNERS. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ~ CHRISTOPHER N. McELUAIN REGISTERED COLOr~ACQ LAND SUR4~YOR N0. 36561 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR AND QN BENAGF QF JEHN EI`GINEERING, INC. ~ / _ _ _ _ PART OF ~ACT B PART 0~ 1RACT 11 PART OF TRACT 12 BANZHAF SUBDIVISION BROOKSIDE SUEDiViSIOR~ BROOKSIDE SU~DIVISION PART OF TRACT 10 ZONED R-1 ~p~.j~p ~_1 ZONED R--1 BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION FOUND 1" YELLOW CAP ZONED R-1 ~S 17669 NEXT TO 1/2" $ • ~ » 493.43 S UARE PIN N~9 ~ 5~7 E Q FOUND NO 5 R AR ' INAGE & UT!L. ESMT ~PLAT} _ EXISTINC 14 4RA ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ WITN ALUM CAP - ~ - ~ _ _ _l_.- - - - - J ~ LS 438 ~ ~ 16' SA~e SEWER ESMT. / ~ ~ BOOK 9~16, PAGE 158 ~ t~ i / M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % i / ~ ~ ~ LOT 1 ~Ji ~RACT A ~ ~ ZONED R-1 121,298 sq, ff. 9 2,78 acres .r.-- P~'og ~ 39, g~ , ~ .,~-N~ ~ 9 -,"C ~ ~ ~ ~R~~ ~ / ~ E~S~ ~ ~ I ACCESS & R 1~ .-.f'l i EXIST NG E+~ -~'"S ~ I EASEMENT SP~ S--' ~ / ~ MAINTENANCE ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ REC. N0. F0208269 , , ~ ~ . / ~ I f ' - ' ~ 1-~~{ & ~ r-, ~ - r , ~~(ti~ M~N / ~ I 98 ~ 1~ EPS` / ti18~~ PGE , / I ~ ~ , ~ a pR AtN / , r f ~ ~ ~ I Q ~ r~' r ~ ~'i ~ r- ~ Q5a , , - ~ ~ N i W / 6~'~ ~t1 6 ~ ~ Z D~ p4 co ~ ~ 9 - ~ ~ r- ~ .c~ . N I cp ` r ~,~t g r ~ Q ~ ~ ~ o~ ~4 ~ ~ ~ ` E5 - ~ ~ ~ LOT 7 a ~ , ~R , r ~ i ~ ~ , ti ~ . ~ S~ , v ~ o ° , o , P~' ~ r' ' 0 1 a~ n i 5,556 Sq. ft / o I cv O ~ 6 S--'~~~~,.- ~ o o v~,~ Oa 3 6 acres N~' M ' ~ ~ p 1 t0 U! r / ~ s / ~ ~ ~ / 1\ \ / ~ ~1 ~ J 2 ~ / O I V O , Q~ W ` ~ ~ ' ~ ~r ~ ~ Z N 5~ ~ ~ r ~ 0 ~1 , o, 2 s~ ` Z / f .I ~ N ~OT 2 , - ~ ~ ~ 1 LOT 6 ~ ~ & ~ p o, N ~ 4 f w ~ ZONED R-1 ENS o, s ~ 1a-~'~ ~ 14,26 sq. t. ~ 10 ~ PSE~' s ~ v~. ~ ~ . I ~E E o m 1.,. / ~ ~.33 acres ~ R PIN P o ~ o, ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ / v~ I o, G~ ~y ~ c1j ~ , T wI F ~ ~ 10 UTlLI,Y & ~ ~ ~ ~~`y DRAINP,GE EASEMENT ~ I ~ -9 u~ ~ ~ ~Q Q ~ ~ / ~I W ~ ~ W TRACT ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~~9 ~ sra ~ \ ~ ( ~ 121,298 s. ft. F c7 !f 9 c~ w~ q 2 O 2,7~ acres ~ w I , ~ ~ ~ o ~ a I t~ W o G ~ t~ w~- '`~e 15 6 I Q I ~ m 0.73 ~ ~ (0 (0 Q A~1 9 „E ~ - - id88'25'17"E - U') z o ~ 0 6 A~~ s5, p~ . _ W ~ t, 5, 0 ~ _ Q~ ~ N~ s a5 p 12~ ___106.19-- t~l c~ Q ,4-~ E ~ c~ N'9 ~ ~ LOT 3 _ ~ 14 ~ Z ► _ o ~ ~ F ZONED R-1 ~n w ~ / v~ I ~ ~ ~ , W X I . ~5 / ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ q ~ ~ ~ ° 6 C1 / z i 1~~ ,2~ ~ Q4~- i N,~2 ~ O~a7 5 ~ Q U ~b C \ ~ o ~ / C ~ 12,959 sq. ft. o W d ~ / - y~ ~ \ ~ o I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.30 acres ~ ~ i \ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .a ~S \ \ \ ~ z ~ v'< ~ J w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~s °o~ ~ ti ~ m I ~ ~ ~ ~j, ~ W APPLEWOOD KNOLLS- ~o ~ 10 UTILITY I / \ ~ ~OY ~ ~ ~ N N pr'y DRAINAGE EAStr~~~T I / ~ 17 s. ft. o W i 12TH FILING F'~.- ~ F -i- C;i~ ~:r'~!-~: I_} I_~~ 12- \ ` 3~~ q 0~ ~ R N 7 6 7 8 7 5 7 i ~ Q ~ M l V ~ ~ 0. 4~ acres Q m c o \ 9~ d~ I r~~~ ~ t' --------a____ J c ~ l ~ 0 L O T 4 ~ N o ~ ~ ) ~ t ~ ZONED R-1 w . 121.93 I LOT 3 -4, ooZ I 1 15 s. ft. ~ -o ~ S880858 ~ 3°2 ~ ~ ~ ~NN O ~ / o, G~ \ \ I ~ Y , ~ 0.30 acres ~ / ~l \ \ Q o Z 5 U TIL! TY & ~ ~ A \ 0 ~j~ I 0 1 / ~ 'A F A , \ , , > » DRAINAGE EASEME~~T ~ / 9i 9 - N89 23 04 E ~~7, m ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 33.22 33.11 (TYPICAL) y ~ / 0 ~ s, 9 F ~ . > ~ \ ,ry , ~ ~A ~ \ \ ~ ~ S89 23 04 W 243.90 a y~ p, . 0~ F F~, ( l ~ .~ti ~ \ cP~,,s~ \ ~ - ~ ~ 9G \ F ~ ~ 1 4 ~ w 1 ~ A ~ 'y ti G~ ~'S ~ ~ ' ~ ~ g ~ F A F ~ ~ 10 UTILITY & ~ Q N ~ F~' I ' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~t Z , ~ ~ y ~'ti I t z \ ~ S \ ti \ ~ , I ~ 'Q ~ ~ X ~ / / f ~ \ tv , ti- ~ P S 2/ ~ N W z ,r, ~ o ~ LOT 8 ~ ~ ~ / ~ti ~ \ W r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ „ , . ~ 0 20,798 sq, ft. ~ Lo~ 2 ) ~ ~~n ~ W ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ 0 0.48 acres ~ ~ 0 ~ 3,46~ sq. ft. SS I° ~ r• ~ Z ~ ~Q ~Q, ~ po ~ ~ a ~ 1" r ~3 ~ 9i 0.30 acres S~ ~ - w ~ ~ ~ ~ S• / ~ y G~ i ~ ~S ~ ~w ~ ~ w / S i ~ • o . ~ ~ c~ ~Q~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ F` / ~ o F i Q ~I ~ ~ ~o• , ~ F ~ ~ i O ~ i . . fi~, , ~ j ~s , ~ ~ '1' z W L~T 11 ~ 1 A~ F` ~ h ~ d ~ z 0 , ~ ~ ~ 0 ~i \ I ~ 54,842 sq. ft. .,r ~ ~ W ,~Q ry 0 ~ j, s, ~ F,ti, ~ ~ ~ o ~n z ~ h ~ ~p j , ~ ,r ~ ~ ~ Q 1.26 acres z w W p~ '1• 9i ~°S i ~e ~ W I~ ~ cn fi~ ~ ~ S ~ f'7 _ u~ W Q / 9 -~i` \ ~ , ~ w r _ tn w / ~ i~ 3' \ ~ ~ ~ ~ sr x Q ~ / ~ ~1~ ~ 'A ~tE~~ ~3 ~ ~ , r ~ F~ ~ ~ / / w ~ ~ ~ ,_f / ~ LOT 1 , / ~ ~F ~ ~ v~ ~ Q ~ a~ 1~' ~ , _ ~ ~1~, ~ 13,064 sG. ft. _ w 1 ° w ~n ~s9°25 2~ ~ LOT 9 ~ ( J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < t ~ ~ , ~.30 ~cres l.- . ~ r~~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ w c~ o ~ 70.42 ~ 13,549 sq. ft. 9~, c~= ~ c~ c~ _ _ ~ 9 0 ~ ~ Q ~ z - - - - - ~ 0,31 acres ~ p ~ - ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ s` ~z I _ ~ 9~, ~ ~ ~ 9~, ~ v Q I 'Y , F l, -l i_.- `1, ~ ~ I ~ x \ F T~. ~ ~ . . . . ~ > T o ~ ~ w \ ~ P ~ . ti/ \ I ~ ~ > s ~ ~ .~r~,` ~ i s ~ , I 1~~ ~ ~ 1~\ F~ , _ ~'r ~ ~ ~ ~ , Q , ~ , ~ F P ~Q . o o ~ \ o ~'9 ~ . . ~ . . 0 . . ~ ~~g, 9~ I , 2 ~ P~ ` o~`~ ~~a° ~ ~ I 20 10. 58' GT \ . ~ ~ . . <v ~ \ , ~ a ~ . . / , \ ~J ~ _ TRACT C F ~ ! ~ ~ ~ - - ~ - DETEN110N TRACT . . . / ~ , ~4 .P . . ~ ~5 ; ~ ~ ~ r Fyy S ~ 4~.~1.. 9.65 ~ ~ 18,408 sq. ft. S ~ RR, . ~ . / ; ~ . P ~ , , ~ R ~ C~ . ~ F~. Q~! e` LOT 1~ ~ 23.a~ ~oez3 0.42 acres 9. ~ ~ C21 a _ s . . ~ 12;91 ~ sq. ft. ~ ~ . . .._..___r .r . . ~ b ~ - ~ . P C . . . . . , ~ . . . . _ 'i_ 0.3~ ~cres ~ ~ o ~ . ~ 0 ~ \ S~9'9 9 56°1N , ~ ~ 10' UT{LiTY. 8c ~ ~ C~p , SH~Dil~6,lNQICATES ,EXIS7ING S \ . , ~ 63.70 Q DE1'E~IT~4N EASEMENT; REC. IVO, . . DRAI~}AU~. ~ASEMENT~ ~ ~ ~r> L 2~D614~2621 ~ HEREBY ~ ~ - - - , VACATED BY . TH.I~ PLAT _ _ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~.16f S °19'56"W 63.70 ~ _S89 - - 2. ~ 1 ~ (SEE NOTE .9) . i i s~ ~ . . POINT , S8919 56 IN C22 ~ ~ » 492.~~ ~Et~NN~i C ~ UND 1-1~4 PLAS. ~0 UTILITY & „ lg ~ C P LS 34594 DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOUND 1 1/4 L ` DETENTION EASEMENT CAP S 4 94 ~ RAINAG€~-, ~ L 5 N _ RN G~6142621 20 ~ ~ ASEMENT r . ~ 4,998 sq. ft. _ _ °~u, 40.00' 0.11 acres ~ ; _ _ - - ~ c e~a ~ I 't7sO! :~i M SVV,L~tO~°n~9 17 ~ 4n W 17 I eLFdr I vv~v i s T i ~n.r. W t~ Q , LOT, N00030'56"W ~ CAP L 34594 cn z F UND 1-1/4,, ALUM. ,APPLEWOOD BAPT,ST CMURCN SUBDIVISION ( cn T ILLEGIBLE LOT 6 , ZONED R°1 I J: 1824 206-147 SURVEY FINAL-PLAT 6142-FP-2.DWG REC. N0. 2006142621 w L0, 6 U I I ZONEDR-1 ZONED R-1 C) Q ( ~ LO N POINT OF mHN W 1/4 CORN ° N00 30 56 W FOUND 3-1/4" AC IN R8 22,00s~ CMMENCEIr1ENT REVi SI ON S ~ PLS 24962 1147.96a 1475.77 S89'19 5~~ W ~ ~ ~"C 1 4 SEC 28 ENGINEERINGJ . S89'19 5~~ ~N ~11t!/All~ 3_1 ';RFFwanswnRTltRYPASZ L-j t] 2623<73S89°19'55"W INGS ° SQUTI°1LiNE OF THE NORTH4VES7 QUARTER SEC110N 28 9ASlS OF BEAR ~ r,~----_ f i M W END ALiGNM~~dT j l ~ ' ~ ~ ; ~ ~ sTa, s+~a i ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ 5s~a.ss I - ~ _ _ _L_. - + ~6365.-@9-- ROPOSED 18"RCP ~ ~ - c~ • _ ST. ' FI~.~~ ~J E~~.~~~~ ~ ~ - --T--- - ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ FND REBAR ~ ~ ~ ; _ I ~ 25' RADIUS ~ `~l~Pl_,~.~TIC CAP ~ ~ CURB RETURN ~ ~5 `'45~4 / / W~I I { W HANDICAP RAMPS ~y 25' RADIUS~, s, ~;~r r; ;r., . ~ j ~ ~ URB R~TURN ~ , I ; ' I I I w ~ W~HANDIGAP RAMP~a ~~'~='`'r~'~~~~'=~' ~ i I i i I ~ I oM I ~ ~ I Y ~ PROPOSEp ~ r ~7~ , ~ i iti ~•>I ;'r i ; ~ ~ ~ i~ r~ ; ~ . ; i'~: ~ ~ ~4 1~ A~ ~1~ .I ~I N. ~ I ~'i PT STA. 8+05.87 I;v ~ 1 rf D1TCH l..i;'iC.~~ f~.~a. ~ I ~ ~ ; N 5649,1 ~ ~ ~ I ' E fi220,97 z ~ f; S00'36'S6"E r} n(I l F ( 7„ 'r~. r, -''~T ~d ~ . i~'1 q ~ i.~t,'~ . ~l I. i Y~ r I ~,r.~ i~ ~...i i ~1 ~ 1•~ ~ r~ PRI I. PRC STA. 7+45.37 p E 67.27' . I S~/''`.i~YJ~:~r ~1~1f)Fff(':;~i1i~. ~:~.%Ci:1S ~i J~:J~i ~•1 ! ~ ~ ~ I ~ E 61~62.65 \ ~ I~ I ~ + i'~ r r r I +„«1 ! r ~ I I ~ 4 ~ Ll N ' PROPERTY ~ i~° R ~ r~G 5, ~ ~E~a ~ ~ i 6 x 1, , ~ 7N/ALL~M. CAP FND 5,~g, RE~„R ~ ~ ~~,v;~~~~~~~~,;~. ROAD STA. 7~ j L,;I~IE FN~R L~~ 438 ~ . ~ i~~E~ DITCH ?A. 17 i % I \ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ _ - STA. 16+7! N 570; ~ STAo 15+65.8$ ~ ~ E 610~ N 5813.35 4' - , f 6 74.3 ' E 4 5 ~ , ~ ; 0 ' k0 ~ 1 ~ 1 d r.:r / i ~,.~r. ! ~1~~~:~ ,~,r 1 ~ ~ , ~ , ~ , , ~ . ~ 1 ~ / - - r,nr;~ i r~nr r.~~•1~-~~,'rrr ~.ti ~ / ' . ~!r.J.~:1~~;~:15. :1.1~1i1~' f ~.,i,,y`a, , ~ t ~ / .r ~ ±d',~~ i l ° ~ / '~y t ` hQ o .h p / / , ~ I t Oy l= BEGIN ALfGNMENT ~ ~ / ~ / o ~ J . 1 Pr~ {~x ~ O f 5TA. ~Tav \ <~ra, , ~ ~ ~ X ~ N 6061.53 o h e ~ ~ ~ E 5969.52 ~ t ` ~ ~ ~ STA. 14+91 i i _ ~ ,.?'~i; i' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~860.62 ~ ° ~ ` E 6~16,13 ~ ~ o i ,0 i k { i ~ ~ ~ o , ~ i ~ ~ P a ~ 0 ~ i ~ 4 I ~ ~x i ~ ' N i ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / p+ + ~ / ~ . ~ ~ a~ ,y t31 ~ ~ ~ :rS; 0~ / / ~ : ~ ~ ~ / ~ 6 x15 CBL c~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~p i STA. 13+$2.05 OAD STA. 0+91.7 ° ~ ~ ~ / R ~ ~ 5946.88 f q e DITCH STA. 12+78.49 r E 5948.13 1~ ~ ~ ~ A4 ~ ~ ~ a-- ~ ~J ~ ~ / ~ i / ~ ~~e P aPQS~a QRAINAGE ' ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~L .~.~r ti~ ~ r. .rr- -.-r ~r. ~ ~ ~1~~ ~ ~ y! ~ {r ~ rlt . , 3 ~ ~ EASEMENT " ~r~r• r,~~1~;~n~~~~:•~~r,r.; ~ ~ , , Q :~;`:Lir~r".,`?~:;5. s~~~~,~~t;y~.a;~.,~~~. / X i Fi ~ ~ ~ r.+,~ a .l ~ -t , ~ ~ ' F.~.lr~k_~) f.. I / ~ s ~ ~rr ~ s X / / i ~ ~~+1?t, ! /'s / / / \ I ~ / / ~ a / ~ ~ ro ~ , , . .y 5 ~ r ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ti~ i \ . ~ . ` ~ ~ •r„ ~ ~ i - ._,....r-- ~ ` ~'x OQ . + ~ PC STA. 1+ 18.89 p k PT STA 3 2 1 k0 ~ 0 ~ ~ _ - ~ r N 6Q2$,7 5861.26 ~ . ~~z i o , i ~ E 5822,39 ~ 19 , E 5868,$0 , ~ ~~10 ~ ~1 a,00 k0~ ,Ofl STA. 11 +QO ~ 1~ 10~ > 6188.93 ~ ~ E 5803.35 -;~Fr•; ; ~ BEGIN ALIGNMENT a~ ~r r. ,~,n,,~..,.,,.,,,. A. 90+04 ~ ~;~,n,, ~ ~ ~,,t,,, . ~ S? 1 f7r`~~ tnil'„~~~ ( ~ rr~; s:~ `s?,_- ; ~ N 6285.88 ~ E 5778.84 I f i ~ TCH PROPflSED DITCH F~~ r~teA~ END DI , ; ~ ~ PROPOSEQ DRAINAGE ,-4~~ ~~~sT~~~, N 1 A~5.08 t ~ EASEMENT ~ ~ , E S 51.95 ! ; ~ % ________-----_~-_e_________ _ - - T___________ _ -E----C-----F-- ~ Ii ~ - - - - -~G ~ -,C- -F I i _ _ _ ~ i _ _ _ _ _ _ j~' ~ ( r i ;~:a„' S;'~''~~ t~'~ ; a ~ ~ DESIGNED: JF DATE:07 16 2007 f- CROUVN LAND DEVELOPEMENT QUAIL HOLLQW HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN C1 DRAWN: Jf DATE: 07 1 S 2007 GKCOTTON CONSULTING, ING SUBDIVISI4N CHECKED: RS DATE: 07Z1 6 2007 WHEAT RIDGE, C RADO REVISED: DATE: Hydrologic Engineering and Desi9n ~ , . i / ; 5~~+ ,...~r-fTfJ.. ,,~rryf.~ , f j ~ NQTES: _ _ ~_<< ; r , . ~ , ';j"'~,: r.~~,.~,., _ '`_~f~.~ . t~~;vl~' / r.. . r . H - ~ ..i~.~., ,.r, r : ti~• ',+1~~ ~ ~r~~ f . r~....~~ • . `ir.~.1.. ,,.f ^ ,J~~ J^ ''%i f~j . :f,:._......._....£~:,.::~:~; EX ING ; . . ~ " . A" MP . ~ 1. FLOOD ZONE LIMITS ARE SH~WN FOR THE FEMA INSURANCE I~ATE MdP ~ ~ ~ . , • . ...,___,_~_,.~.r.___i; .f'.,......._......~...., FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY COLORADQ AND INCORPORATED AREA, ~ f _ . , {TO BE RE~?yED~. ~'r:. J `,4 i~AP NUh~BER 08059C0215-E AND MAP N~~IBER 08059C0194~-E BOTH DATED '`j , r J . JUNE 17, 2003. THE PORTION OF THE PR~PERTY NORTH OF TH1S LINE IS IN r- F, , _ %~~~~~1;l~ ~ ~sr,;. ~ y,!'.' ~ ; 's .'l~.% f1,'r~s-/~f-~~4,' ,"'~i , ,r,..r ZQNE~AE OF THE 100-YR F1.00D HAZAR~ AREA, AND HAVINC BASE FLOOD ;.~-~:,~r.,;~----; ~~-~r~! - -~"s,-., ; ~.,r . I r~, . ,r_~~ . 'f ~ ~ ,..r ,,,,.~,r' , - THE PROP THE SOUTH 4F THIS LINE ; ~ - . i~ ELEVATIONS, THE PORTIONS OF ~RTY TO , ,rf~ , r , ; i/ ~ ~r~ F . : i ~ . z~ . . ~ / ~ ''f• .~i r i . . . ..,.i~ ~ i . .y~~,~~<' ~ LIE 1N ZONE-X WHICH 1S OUTSIDE OF TH~ 100-YEAR FLOOD NAZARD AREA ' { ~ ~~f! I ~ i..,,~,~sy{,~ ;.,1.. .~l~ir~~i .t ,:~+.••~'r , .S,_~~ i " ~ ~y~~;~ _..~i ~ ."r! ~ ~~J..., , ~ ! ~S:'r,S~ _ ! ' } . i , . . i . i ~ ' ; ~ 2. SEE THE QUAII. HOLLOW CLASS 9 FL40D~~,AIN EXCEPTI~N AND QUAIL HOLLOW ~ ~ I" ~ ~ ~r~ ~-:~+f ~ ~ i ~ iSi i ~?S I DRAIANGE REPORT FOR INFORMATIOh~ ONSTRUCTION IN THE ~ _ ; ~ ~ ~~,~./i ~ ~ ~ FINAL REGARDING C , . . , , „ ~ ~ r ~ r t, ~i;j~ .r ~ y ~ . r r ' ; ~ , . , ; ~ ~ ~ ` ~ I FLOODPLAIN. _1,__ , , ; . , ~ ; ~ ~i , ~ . `i : t~ = ~ ( ' ,r ~ , r~ ~~~I~~ / I.I 1 J ~ . i ~ . - p / W I I f l. r " n ! ~ . ! [ d 1l~ ~ - ..~I • . ;l•r.•h ~ . 1 ,.~1. ~ i~~/~... ~J I" _ . . ~ 3. BENGNMARK ELEVATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WHE~4TRIDGE AS FOLLOWS. i , , u.^.'Fi~'.::rl~ r~l 3JJ~ / .r 1 i , , y ,}4 ' i ~?I ~;~.r~~~?~~JF-~i I . ' 4~r " _ ' THE W 1 4 OF SECTION 28 AND HAS Ah~ ELEVATI4N QF 5d~51.fi6 ~;...,,,,~R~. r. ~ „ ; , ~l _ ~ ~ t~, ,,~,r, '~~;;~~•,;y..._.., . ~ , , ! ~ , N~VD 1929 , / j / f~. ~ ! r.! ' ~ ~`i r { ; 'v~:: r / ~ , i,,-r~ . i ( ----'r- ? _ r~~ ~ . ,,~2) EXISTtNG- t s , ~ _'4 PROPERTY LIN - J' ~ ~ 18" ~ r- . , ~ ~ ~ s rr~ ; ~ r~' T0~ ~ f Y~ ~ ~ ~ r~~ ~ J. ' ~ , l ~ i ~ " !{/'tr- r-- ..i~ i ; ~J I :f ~iy'`,~:L,•. r ; ~ , OVE~~ - a,. 1 ~ ~ ; ,,--_.;1''•:;~"~~i `~~~~:i' ft~ ~ , ^~r.~u~u.ve rr... .rn ~r~itrirr~~ ! ..~r f ~,i l ' . , ~ ~ ~ / y 1 ~ . , . l/.. t , . . , 1 ~ ~ F ` I ~ ~ 1 'r .rrr i ~ •?1~,`~ ~-t-."fl7~7~/ "l~ ` +~y 1~ •'r~'~ ' -•--•r,- ~ ~ .~r' -e~°~ Y f1 i ~ ~ ~ ~l !t :r~ u ~ t~. .~Ji~i l~ ! ~ l ,r r< 1" . I . . , , , ,.r fr . ~ , N + ''r•, r, _ r , . . ~ ~ ~ a ~ d.e/J*,r ~ ,~/it , G ~f! ~ . Tr ~ ~f ri S~.' ~'i ' ' r ~ ~ ~ } •1 ''t. ,r~ ~ S y'"".__''•.. ' `'r .^~^~'+.''f ' .f ~ ~'S ~T 1'~ ~ ~ . , 'r'/~;/.- ~ryi~ j' ~ ~ C ' d ~n, ~ ~ , ~i ~ / ~ ~1°+J i=P ~ ' , ' . , /.i'~ ,~.r' . " f.s~r~~ ` ~ ~ 'rr r,~ ~r ~ ~ , , . . t~ ! r ~ ° ~ ~ '1.,~ ~ 11 ~ '~~~„'y, r'~ t' r~~~ r ~ r . . ~ ~ i - /~,1 r~?~ ~ d ~`r 'a ~ J~ r ~ ~"~y! ~,r~^"~,,.~"' I i ~ Fr ~t~, ! ~i ~ ~ ~f''•?`~. ~.I ' i ~ ' ~ ~L . if. ` ~ ~r~ r,r~ y ~ ~i . ~ `',r" .~'~"'r ~h""'"" ~ 'R~, ' {s~r\'' ~ ~i } ' ' ~r'".,,.,.~ .y' ' , i i i ~ ; A~ '`r+.~~' l I S~~ ~ % . ~,S • ~ ~ S + ~ I ~~er ~ ~ l ~ it y/ ..,.'r j ° ~ s; ~ ~ / i ,,,.,.'M~ r~~' i ~ ' , Y l r {tr '•t ~f ~ ~ ~.I ,Yf ~ ~ .if~ ~ y`^~~ n'~~ '4 ~ ~ -/~rr.4. ',,~;I''-L, .l' ~ i ~ r~f ,t`" l~ 1 ~ ~ •~7/ (`7'p p r,,..-~` , ~ i ~~~,r1v~.,.i~i .,r..rr~~~~ ~r r ~r~~ ~~~"~p~~' i ~ I 1 rJ` 1 r~~ JII~~~I~IA~ t ~ , h, ~Fl~ .r,l.~ t~? Iri.. }r~ t l ~ ~ ' ' ~ r~ ~ ^f,i"~'r r,~T~r~ c ~ r'.^i,~'rGYr ''?r,~' :S. ~ r ~ ~ . ~ ~_.ti ' .r''" ~,.s^k" ..,,,~.J,,~,.. r.,.:;.~ ~~....,r# EXISTING i~ , t ~ ; / ; ; ~ I.rirffiJ r~' , \~`~~ri,l+rii ~'1 ~ ~'-l".. ,fjf~-..,~ i ! / ~ ~ ' CONCRETE ,i ; , ~ t ~ ~ , ~ ~ ' , , ~ tr§il r l r / r~~ ~ ~ 'r ~ i : ~ ~ P. i ! J i , . ~,7/,' l~ ~ DROP 5TRUCTI}RE , i~r~, , ; ; . ,r ~ ~ ; ( .t.~ I{ , , ~,5 . I f Y .....r , '~,r i c ~ 5A' .,~w ' ~ DROP ~ ) , , . . " - r/, ! ~ ~ ~rf' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~y ff/ ~ ~ ~ + ~ J ~ : : ~ ~ ,:a' , ; ~ ~ ~r f,' r ~ STRU(~j`~URE ; ~ ~ .,._~_....•;~,~l, J ;(r Jt."~~~ i r; :1~ ~ ~ r/ ~ <<;! t;~ , l , , T ~ f , .r.._-~ .l' ; ~{;~t~ ~ i.~ ..J'°+~ / '•J " ` r ~ 5~ r l, f . t~ ~ S~ t S?~ ' ~ ir ~ 0 f.,~ ! 1 1/, }r.: ~r ' ~1r ~ ~j.~ ~ ~ i t 1 ~ir~l~ ~ t~ ~ r~i'. / 1 i%~ 1 1 ~ / ~ t ~ +Ir ~ ~ / r ~ f r» ~Y~% ~~~rr i~,a~.s~. ~r rr,n rr ~ ~i 6 ' ~ ~ ~ ~t k4 'r fi I ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ S ~ 1 / I ~ i' ~.r ; ~ , : ~1,,r,.~ ~'s , i ~ .r.>` , P POS~D CR~ K ; 1 ' ~ / ;'~i ~r ~ i ( ~ , ? . , ~ EX I I ~ f ~ ~ i'~~ ~1,, , , - ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ , , l. „ ~ f~IP V~~,IENT5 r , , , P . , ~ /r . ~ ''.ti~~:~ ~,~~,ur, , 24 C P i ~ ~ ~r , ~ ~ ~ ~ "~.9~ r ;,i~, rG~, 1'~~ ~ft)~-.B.E REMOVE `',,1`~°° ; , i ,r 1 , ~ , / ~ , ~I r EXISTING LOW FLOW ; , , ~ 1, , J ; ~ dr I ~ ` i ' ~ 2 ~I I ~ ' / - /J ~ Y - ~ ` r ~ VER a , ti ,~t ~ - ~~a.., it, /f , ~ / i DI SION INLET I, i , ~ ' j i " ~ f. ~ ~ ~ ` , , ;r; s~~,, ~ ~ 7 a,.,, •-1 i~ i PROPOS~~'`•~,.. ; , , ,d; ~ d; , , , ~ , 1 .fz_ _ f ~+r, t ,18 xfi CB ~ r% ' ~ _ , r_..•• ,tl f°~G'•, f , 1~ i r` rf , ~ . ~ . ' t, ~ ~ Q ~ ;~•„1 , ~~i ~ ~ ~r ~ 'r.~_.. / ! ~ r.~ s , t ~ ",iY f 1 i 'f+ " ~ ' 1 . ♦ , f !t ~ 1 .I ~ < J i ~~7 i1 ~d >;4 r. rt ~ . , / d n. ~ ~ ' frii, "'1fY ! f~3 ii ~ ~ I 1' +~li _ ,!y'~ rr ~ ~ , rf r.r `rs ~ nr,r¢ ~i r f > » ~ ~ ~r ' ~ ii ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ - ~ ~ , ; . , , , , i ; ~ , ~ u t . / ~ ' . f 'r ~ 4 ~ ' ~ '1 : r ~ : ~ i~ ~ i ~i~ 1 'f ) l ~ ~ '~ir+r f ';~j ~ h ~ ~ ii & 1 ' ~ ' , r., ~ , ~ '1 ,l~ f%" 'yf ~ ~ 'j ' 1 ~ f ~~Iq ~'b I / ~ ,i :J ~ ~ ! ~ ~1 y +l ~ t j • 1 I} ! ~ ti 1 ~ f ~ , ~ ~ I 1 . r 1 ~ 1 1~ / a ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ i , ~i. ~ i' I t''' ' i . w ~ . ~ '4 , , 1 4 ~ t 7 r ~ i ~r~ . , :,r ~ ~ ; ~ ;,F;'t~ t , ~ ti s ti ~ ; PROP~?SEb , . ~ ~ ! ;s; i ; ~l~ ° f ii' ~ r%~ ' STOR~'~ PT4R , ~ r' ~ r , , S fi ~ , , i' ~ if .1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i r i~ ,f+~ ~ . ''•~f r . . . . ! ~i ~ . I r ~ . , . r . ~ r i . ~ ~ ii rr.r . r ~ . 7 ~ i ( i . t. I l1 ~ ~1r~' ~ 1'~ e . i ~ ~ . ~ , , ~ , r, ~ ~ r ~ WATER C~l ~k~ITY , I ~ ~ . r ~ ~ ~h ' 'r ~ ~ I / ~ , r;°. ~w ~ (ii~:~'1f;:?i.'~C .?:lri~j`7t~t.}~i;lf"1 r i ~:~e~' ~ i i r~l ~ rr+ .1' ~ . , ~ ~ BMP ~ ~ ,s~~ •S ~ ~~~r ~ . . 1 'r. r . 'r. , ~ . ~ ~ . ~ r "t2t / i L1 t / . i ' . i ` . . / i' ~ l,~ ~'i r r . , . , 'o ~ . , , , . . . ~ 4' , ti'~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~'4 ~ ! ' ~ / ~ ~ F ~ SC G '~s , y 1. ~ I . ; .A ~ , y t t ~ , f , . ; , `~'~~"s 'i ~ ° r~ . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ° , ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ , . . , r •~4~~ ~ ~ls, i,~~~ ~ ~ , h~ s ' r 1~c~'" - ~ 1, r 4 , .~ti r~ j } ~ PROPOSE~ 1 f 1 r~ , ; ~ ~J" ~ f.~, t tl~ ~ 5 1 ~ .e ~ ~ ~ ~ i.•-.'' r.~` ~ 4 1 ; , '-,,TYPE R IN~,ET ~ / ~ \ ✓ ~ ~ ' ~ r•, 1 , ; . ~ , ~I , r,,~~' ~ ~ , ~ ~,,.r r i ~ ~ ~.;ti~..'~., `~;,~~t~e. ~ ~ ~ ; ~ 1 , i ~ ~ / ~ ! i 1 ~ ~ +t h 'r.'* ' ' ~ ~ 1 I j ~ : ~ ~ *r ~f J ~ r ~ . `•%~'r ~ ~ . ''1 ~ 17 ,t f~ G .r• i ~i ~ ~ 1 ~"G~ S . ~ a/' , r ~ ` ~s~ ~"~~''~l'~~''~~;~'~,. ; ~`1,, ~ ~ F- ~ r. ~ .q. ~ , ~y, • ~ j r ~ S '~f ~ f r ~i 7 ~ - f` 'ir'~lllnr" 't t ~ ~ I ~ t ~ 4a, ' ~ ~ t, ~~J j/l~'~l~i ~ ''•f ~ ~,,f ' s t~s~ f~ i j ~i~ i ; i ~lI ~ ~ / r~ ~ 'J__~ r ~ ~ ` ~ -'7 .J, ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i ~ 'r'~l ~r' ~ ,1' i r i ~ ~ , l !'~`rvrr~ vs r% r~.- 1 ~ ,1~ , ys~ f t i i~~ ~4 ! ~ .l`~»i.f~~ l ~ ~ ~ J . .f i ~ ; //U ~ r ~ ~;i . ~'`'p ~+.r ~r✓ ~ il.~ ~ ( . : ( . .,1 ~ ~ ~ 'ti f r i . J' r~' e ry ~ry , ~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ .'/i~ll ' ' r ~ r~1 ~`'`~'°4p~. ri+. ~.'"r'- , ..1` i , ~ ~ - ~1 ~ ~ I „1 i ~ , ~ ~ , ~ i ~ i. ~ ~Il~'t ~ ~ i ~'L ~~",4,.~'^+w ~ ~ f.~" '.t ~ l~i h t j ~ J 1~~i ~ j~~ ~ r+r{' `i' '4'• + ~ i~ . / 'r~,V~~%~ '~~;~o. ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ V'~"f r ~ ,r ~ rit' .."i ~ ~ i j ~ ~J ~ i ~ i ~,.~,.~,~r~ .~~~~,t,,,,r~;,~~,~ '~~r~ PRO~OS .CP~ 8~ CITY~~ OF IW EATRIpG ; / .:ki~.ilff .J.~ ,r~~.{.i~ ~ ~~ri,., ~ ~ ~ ~i r~ ~ : YCr. ~ ~J ' F ~ ~~;•1 ~ ~ 4 , r~ ~ir;,~~• ~ ~ t~; ..~,,.k 'r FL00 P '1N.. ~0' f,~ARY UP'DATE ~ d ~ r: / ~ ~ 5 ~ sri rr ~ ;r~ .~~~i .X~ 1 ~!r~"'i' ~ r ~i . ~ ~ CY1; ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ;1 i i ; ~ rr ~ } 'i 'i ~ - PR~~,~ ED TRA FaZ01D` L'' ~,'~,1~s~i~~ ~'i~ . , ~:a ~ ~ ~~s~~s ;%t1 ~ 'o~ 's ~ 1 ~ ;r CREEK~~ S6CTION ~ ; ;r> l, ~ . ' ~ ;Yy ' 1 i ~ ~ ~ ` S:1 j: GRADE T M(~~~H~'..,:,,?~;~~;~I~~~' ''t ~ ; N ~ ; / ; , , b~q _ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ 1 ~ ' ; EXISTING t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ A~~ 'i~t~''~~ ~ 't / 'r ~ f ~ , j ~ , , ~ EXISTING C4WTOUR~~~. i~ ~ , u~ , , ; , ~ r ~ ~ ; 00 ONE~AS SHOWN ~ , ~ ~ / ~ , FL D Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ / i ; r << , ; ; ~ E ~ t~ . , ~ r~;~,,~;i 1 , ~f ON 2603 FIR~I MAP ~ ~ ,~r 1`~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ,r , ~ ~ ~ , i ~ ~ %i ~ ~ , • ~ , ~ r r ~ ~/f 'v ~ iJrlrr~~~ ~i • ~ r~ { ~ I ~ i ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ i i y„i ? 1 ~ .._...~.......K ~ .,r/ 1 ~<< ; IrE r,~r, ~ A. i ~ ( ~ ,'~'Y ~ ~ ; r ! __'p' - 4'c - ,;r,r. r'.,rp.._..,...•••.- ,f , , ~ ~ ~ r~L~~ _ ~ ~Z -1E.,u r;:4--,... • -r ~ _ ~ l~i ~"'~r'~', ,i~~~••-•;~i" •~r` :~~P r .~1' r :.i~ - ' r ~ ~if ~ i; r 'r , u ~ , 1 , ?~r~ii~ ;!,/~'rf 4~.~~~.;., . °r; . ; / , ~ ~ ~ r.,, ; , . . • E~ f.'~ , ~ I ~ ~s n,t~i` i~^IJ F~~~, .rR~''`.f p ~!r~~ ~~r . i ~ ~ f Yv.!~.ilii v.' ,..il i Si ~~r~i~•'7 '~~~~~'lli~j'~ ~ ~ ' ~ PROPOSED DITCH .~~..~n~ ~~,y~.~ :iir•~in n~~~ 1. ~ ` ~:%~r~~ ~ ~1 ~'1C'1~~~ ~ ~ i r~~.~,~Jl~.~n~e: -1.,~.+~~I~~~~1:V~~ iir, ~l~~~i~T' i ~+r ~ R ; ~ ~ s;. ~ .~„f~,~., r BOTTOM=2 1~1itih~) ~"i ~ ~ ~ i :~t:p,: ~.ylt~ , ~ ~ i ~ . ~~'p,~ 'I f ~ t,i ~ ~lrr ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ..E~fS~I'1~'fr-.~'~~'"'~M4~' i ' 'rr, DEPTH=2 ~ ; < < ! + ~ 1 %i i 1f ~J~ t ~ ~ a ~ , 'w~.' - ~ < < < 1 Z=4: t ; ~ ~ i INV- -54~=~.~~a;;,1lf;~,; EXISTING 36 ~CMP ; y ; . ,i;,,';~;{~.; r ~ ~ i ~ ~ /,'`f 44TH AVE 56~ R01N 0 ti ~ ' ` 3 CREE „ I! CLEAR CL , r 25' 25' ~ I - - - . 1 MAx - - 1~ l I 11=1 I(-i i- ~'~k ~_i I=I I 1=1 ! i= ~ A. 6.5 17' 17' 6.5' ~ i-~ i'-- I=i 38TH AVE v, ~ ~ " ~ r= - ~ ~'-n ~ ~ ~ ~ - -I I I-I I ~~-i I I-I I I-~ I i-I I f= H z FILL BANK ~ SITE a r= 18' ~ ~ D AVE ~ CUT BANK ~ _ 4. ~ 7 ( ~ ~ - - ~ ~ v~ 32N~ AVE E~k! . q,f. I ~ S~N~ GRp. _ UNp i ~ t ~W ~ _ ~ H~ f~ I (9 uy; J ai~ I= TR T SECTION TF~APEZOIDA~ CREEK SEGTI~N , TYPICAL S EE ,Q-----,. ~ cs 28TH AVE I i - - N,T.S. N.T,S. VICINITY MAP _ " f" NTS DESIGNED:_@S DATf: 07-Zl 61Z2007 , QUAIL HQLLOW DRAINAGE AN RA IN PLA DRAWN: TP DATE: 07/16/20QZ GHECKED; GK DATE: 07.116/2007 GKCOTTON CONSULTING, INC JEFFERSfJN COUNN, CITY aF WHEAT RIDGE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION Q~ D G N CZ REVISED; DATE; A Hydrofogic EngineerIng aCtd DesIgt1 Cuk - coP y Quail Hollow Community Meeting January 3rd 2007 Name: Address: Phone: ~ Pa~ m ~ k~~e~~o i s ` I 39 VJ- yraL J'7'` 3r3d i LM 3 aq5e cu~~~ l -Rf - ~ a3a.- ~ TL4 ~R ~/a S'L~p i~A►M AWA -20Z-Zz3S ' 13,3 BU~ ~ ; . , 30 ;L33 N>D ' \ EXHIBIT 4 ~ CROWN LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC P.O. BoX sias Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-5148 (303) 233-4483 En July 23, 2007 The City of Wheat Ridge Plamning Commission 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Vaziance Request, Quail Hollow Subdivision Deaz Members of the Planning Commission: Tha.nk you for hearing our request for a vaziance to the 500' maximum cul-de-sac length requirement. The proposed Quail Hollow Subdivision located at 3301 Quail St. is an infill subdivision surrounded by existing single family homes to the east, the Applewood Baptist Church to the south, and non-accessible privately owned tracts on all other sides. The access to the property is proposed to be an extension of W. 33d Dr. at Quail St. There is only one viable access to the property. Other possible points of access aze not capable of being constructed due to extreme grade differentials or existing storm drainage systexns. Since there is only one point of access to the property, the length of that access is in question; however, we have met with the fire marshal to determine the requirements of the fire district to insure that any needs they may have in relationship to the turning radius of the emergency equipment have been met. The size and configuration of the proposed cul-de-sac do meet these requirements. Please take into consideration that we aze not requesting this vaziance in an attempt to maximize the density of our subdivision. We kiave exceeded the required lot size on all of the proposed sites in order to insure a subdivision that would be consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. In conclusion, thank you again for heazing this request for a variance, and please allow our subdivision to be a positive and productive part of the City of Wheat Ridge. Yo s truly, J. Steven S. McKendry Partner EXHIBIT 5 Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Joyce Manwaring Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 8:50 AM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Church field Meredith, For your informatiou. Joyce Joyce Manwaring, Director Parks aiid Recreation 4005 Kipling St. Wheut Ridge, CO 80033 (303) 231-1308 (303) 231-1350 FAX jmamaaring@ci. wheatridge.co.us www.ci.wheattidge.co.us From: Lhgibbardcspe@aol.com [mailto:Lhgibbardcspe@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:40 PM To: Joyce Manwaring Subject: Re: Applewood Baptist Church field Thank you for your message. It may interest you and the City of Wheat Ridge to know that with the exception of one (1) homeowner (Dr. and Mrs. Macarthur Hill) on the east side of the subject property NO ONE wants to see this property developed EXCEPT the developers! That property is teeming with wildlife that will be permanently displaced. None of those creatures that call that property home will return after it has been developed. What we do to our wildlife, we do to ourselves. When we have so little regard for creatures who have no voice in what becomes of them, one day we will (and in some instances, this is already the case) have little regard as to how our actions impact our fellow humans. Both the City of Wheat Ridge and Jefferson County should be doing ALL that they can to preserve this property for open space and wildlife habitat. Likewise, they should also both be ashamed for turning a blind eye to the irreversible impact/irreparable harm that development will have on creatures who live, breed, and raise their young in that open space. In case no one has bothered to investigate, the Canadian geese use that area during the winter for a resting spot along their flight path. They forage for food back there. They practice "touch-and-go" landings. We enjoy watching their young learning to fly back there. We enjoy hearing them trumpet greetings as well as warnings to one another and their natural predators. Foxes mate and have their kits in that feld. The only people who want to see that field developed are the Hills and the developers for their personal, selfish monetary gain. They care not one iota about what any of the other families whose properties adjoin that space think or want to see happen back there. Does the City of Wheat Ridge REALLY need that property developed? I think not. It is nothing less than utterly ABSURD to say that it needs what little extra revenue it will generate paid into its coffers. Isn't that what CABELA'S is supposed to do? Make the City of Wheat Ridge megabucks? The powers that be in the City of Wheat Ridge right now are ruining Applewood with their lust for dollars. The people who have lived here for decades are NOT impressed with your "glorious" plans. Very truly yours, Linda Gibbard See whaYs free at AOL.com. EXHIBIT 6 7/24/2007