HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/18/2010= , I City of
"� Wheat�idge
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
November 18, 2010
Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning
Commission on November 18, 2010, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal
Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City
of Wheat Ridge. Call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer at 303 -235 -2826 at least one week in
advance of a meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance.
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be
recommended for placement on the agenda.)
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — November 4, 2010
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not
appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.)
7. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Case No. WPA- 10 -01 A resolution adopting an addendum, "3 -Mile Plan ", to the
City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan.
8. STUDY SESSION
A. Artificial Turf
9. OTHER ITEMS
10. ADJOURNMENT
'. �
City of
W heat ridge
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of Meeting
November 4, 2010
1.
2.
3.
4.
Wi
CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chair MATTHEWS at 7:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29` Avenue, Wheat
Ridge, Colorado.
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Commission Members Present:
Anne Brinkman
Alan Bucknam
Marc Dietrick
Dick Matthews
George Pond
Commission Members Absent
Staff Members Present:
John Dwyer
Steve Timms
Sarah Showalter, Planner II
Ken Johnstone, Community
Development Director
(arrived at 8:00 p.m.)
Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary
(Dean Gokey resigned from Planning Commission on September 8, 2010.)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
It was moved by Commissioner BRINKMAN and seconded by
Commissioner POND to approve the order of the agenda with the addition of
an item under "Other Items" to discuss a vacancy on the Commission. The
motion carried 5 -0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES — September 2, 2010
It was moved by Commissioner BRINKMAN and seconded by
Commissioner POND to approve the minutes of September 2, 2010 as
presented. The motion carried 5 -0.
Planning Commission Minutes 1 November 4, 2010
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject
not appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes)
There were no individuals present who wished to address the Commission at this
time.
7. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Case No. WZ- 10 -07 A proposed City- initiated rezoning to the Mixed
Use - Commercial (MU -C) zone district for properties located at 4350
Wadsworth Boulevard, 7540 West 44 Avenue and 7430 West 44"'
Avenue.
Sarah Showalter presented this item. She entered all pertinent documents into the
record and advised the Commission there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She
reviewed the staff report and digital presentation.
In response to a question from Commissioner BRINKMAN, Ms. Showalter stated
that the only statutory requirements for a city initiated rezoning involve noticing
and conducting neighborhood meetings.
Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if the land owner to the southwest chose not
be a part of the rezoning. Ms. Showalter explained that City Council decided to
include all parcels that are in some way impacted by the proposed Renewal Wheat
Ridge Development and this particular property would not be impacted.
However, this parcel will be included when a more comprehensive rezoning is
considered.
In response to a question from Commissioner MATTHEWS, Ms. Showalter
stated that the next step is a hearing before City Council to finalize the zoning.
Any proposed development will go through the site plan review process, building
permit review, and subdivision and replat processes.
Chair MATTHEWS opened the public hearing. The following individuals
addressed the Planning Commission:
Joseph Sadar
He stated that he did not believe economic benefits for the City are necessarily
economic benefits to citizens in the area. He expressed concern that property
values could be lowered by the proposed development. He also expressed
concern about effects on public safety along Upham Street if there is parking off
Upham for housing units. He believed there would be safety issues with
emergency vehicles often using this route.
Ms. Showalter commented that the area has been vacant for many years even
though it is in a major commercial area. It is hoped that the new zoning would
Planning Commission Minutes 2 November 4, 2010
enable development to occur that would increase tax revenue and improve the
image of Wheat Ridge which should improve property values in the area. In
regard to the parking, Ms. Showalter explained that the graphic he referred to was
not actually proposed for the site, but was only an example of how screening
would look.
Mike Markham
Mr. Markham asked for clarification on notification requirements. Ms. Showalter
explained that notifications by certified mail go only to the property owners who
own property that is being rezoned.
Chair MATTHEWS asked if there were others who wished to address the
Commission. Hearing no response, he closed the public hearing.
Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that she would vote in favor of the rezone and
commented that this area has been a highly underdeveloped area for many years
that could be put to good use. If well - planned and well - designed with input from
all parties, it could showcase Wheat Ridge and provide economic benefit to the
city.
Commissioner BUCKNAM echoed Commissioner BRINKMAN's comments and
stated that he would also vote in favor of the rezone. He commented that this is a
first step in the realization of development on the property and is a great place for
application of mixed use zoning. He further commented that, in order to be
successful, it will be necessary to ensure community engagement and
involvement.
Commissioner DIETRICK commented that this is a good opportunity to provide
quality development for an under - utilized area that should improve neighboring
property values over the present condition. He stated he would vote in favor of
the rezone.
Commissioner MATTHEWS commented that these types of developments
generally improve property values of the surrounding neighborhoods.
It was moved by Commissioner BUCKNAM and seconded by Commissioner
POND to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ- 10 -07, a request for a
City- initiated zone change from Restricted - Commercial, Commercial -One
and Planned Commercial Development to Mixed Use - Commercial for
property located at 4350 Wadsworth Boulevard, 7540 West 44 Avenue and
7340 West 44 Avenue for the following reasons:
1. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan and the Wadsworth Corridor Subarea
Plan.
2. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surrounding area.
Planning Commission Minutes 3 November 4, 2010
3. Any applicant for development under the proposed zoning will
provide adequate utility upgrades where needed.
4. The proposed zone change will not adversely impact the public health,
safety or welfare.
The motion carried 5 -0.
8. OTHER ITEMS
• Commissioner BRINKMAN asked when City Council would be addressing
the vacancy on the Planning Commission. Ms. Showalter replied that a
decision should be made within the month.
9. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner BRINKMAN and seconded by
Commissioner BUCKNAM to adjourn the meeting and enter into study
session. The motion carried 5 -0.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
10. STUDY SESSION
A. Streetscape Design Manual
A draft of the revised Streetscape Design Manual was discussed at the September
2, 2010 study session. At that time, Planning Commission expressed concern that
the draft lacked objective standards regarding minimum dimensions and spacing
standards, especially for priority corridors that are likely to see redevelopment in
the future. Since that time, staff has developed an updated draft that sets specific
design goals, standards and guidelines.
Following review of the revised draft, there was consensus that the draft
adequately addressed concerns previously expressed by the Planning
Commission.
Richard Matthews, Chair Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes 4 November 4, 2010
City of
"C � W heat Edge
MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Memorandum
TO: Planning Commission
THROUGH: Ken Johnstone, Community Development Director
FROM: Sally Payne, Senior Planner
DATE: November 10, 2010
SUBJECT: Three -Mile Plan (for November 18, 2010 public hearing)
State statutes require municipalities to adopt a "Three -Mile Plan" for their communities.
This plan is to indicate in a general way how a City envisions areas outside of their
boundaries developing in the future. Such a plan is required prior to a municipality
annexing any land. State statues indicate that prior to any annexation within the three -
mile area, the municipality shall have in place a plan for that area that generally describes
the location, character, extent of streets, other public ways, parks, open spaces, public
utilities and the proposed land uses.
The last update to the City's Three -Mile Plan was in December 2009. Three -Mile Plans
are adopted as addendums to the City's comprehensive plan. The Plans need to
incorporate any newly annexed land or recent revisions to the City's comprehensive plan.
Since the last adoption of the Three -Mile Plan in December 2009 there have been no
annexations or changes to the City's comprehensive plan that would require revisions to
the Plan.
The state statues require that the Three -Mile Plan be updated annually even if there are
no changes or revisions required. Historically Planning Commission has recommended
adoption of the Three -Mile Plan to City Council. State statues require only a public
hearing before Planning Commission. Since there are no revisions to the Plan this year,
based on the City Attorney's recommendation, we are not forwarding the 2010 Plan to
City Council.
A copy of the addendum to the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan of the Three -
Mile Plan is included in your packet. At the November 18, 2010 public hearing, Planning
Commission will be asked to adopt the Three -Mile Plan as an amendment to the Wheat
Ridge Comprehensive Plan. If you have any questions, contact Sally Payne, Senior
Planner at 303 - 235 -2852 or spayne @ci.wheatrid eg co.us
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 02 -2010
Series of 2010
A RESOLUTION CONCERNING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE WHEAT
RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE THREE -MILE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge adopted a Comprehensive Plan on October 12, 2009; and
WHEREAS, C.R.S. 31 -23 -206 (2) provides that the Comprehensive Plan may be amended by the
City from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan did not include any areas outside the corporate limits of the
City as is permitted under state enabling legislation, and
WHEREAS, prior to annexation, a city must have in place a plan for the area considered for
annexation pursuant to C.R.S. 31 -12 -105, and
WHEREAS, addenda to the Comprehensive Plan were adopted by City Council on February 23,
2004, February 28, 2005, May 22, 2006, June 25, 2007 and December 14, 2009 adopting a growth area
outside the city limits of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing as provided by Section 2 -60(b) of
the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; legal notice thereof being duly published in the Wheat Ridge Transcript
on November 11, 2010, said public hearing held on November 18, 2010.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission this 18th
day of November, 2010:
1. That the Planning Commission of the City of Wheat Ridge hereby adopts the amendments of
the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan attached as Exhibit A.
2. An attested copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the Plan amendment and a copy of the
Plan as attested shall be certified to Jefferson County, Colorado.
WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Chair
Secretary to the Commission
CADocuments and SetBngs\ldieldTocal Settings\Ternporary Internet Fil es\ OLK27 \ThreeMilePlanPCReso2010.doc
ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
URBAN GROWTH AREA ADDITION
INTRODUCTION
This document serves as an addendum to the City's Comprehensive Plan adopted by
City Council on October 12, 2009.
The adopted Comprehensive Plan identifies the area of potential development outside
the City's boundaries. The Plan does not recommend any future uses in the general
areas. Prior to any annexation, C.R.S. 31 -12 -105 requires that a municipality have in
place a plan for the area, including proposed land uses. Such plan may extend up to
three miles from the municipality's boundary.
There are unincorporated areas to the northeast, north, west and southwest of the
current City boundaries. Areas to the northeast and north are primarily unincorporated
industrial or multi - family enclaves which, although eligible for annexation, present
questionable economic benefit to the City versus the costs of providing services
A majority of the area to the west of Ward Road north of 1 -70 consists of established
residential neighborhoods, public uses (schools), and a cemetery. These uses
provide little benefit to the City compared to the costs of providing services. A large
area west of 1 -70 between 32 Avenue and Clear Creek is vacant and may provide
development opportunities of benefit to the City. Southwest of the City are
commercial areas along Youngfield and the established residential area of
Applewood.
In the mid- 1990's the City submitted to the Denver Regional Council of Governments
( DRCOG) its proposed urban growth boundary as part of the preparation of the
regional plan known as Metro Vision 2030. The identified urban growth area was
generally bounded by 1 -70, W. 32 Avenue, McIntyre Street, and W. 52 d Avenue.
Containing a little over two square miles, this area was not incorporated into the
Comprehensive Plan.
This Comprehensive Plan addendum addresses the potential urban growth area to the
west of the City. The areas subject to this addendum is illustrated on Map 1. The West
Area was submitted to DRCOG as the City's urban growth boundary for the 2030
Metro Vision update.
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
This addendum meets the requirement of C.R.S. 31 -12 -105 of having a plan in place
should the City consider any annexations in these areas.
The following sections of this addendum address the following growth area as
identified below:
West Area (that area generally west of the City bounded by 1 -70, W.
32 Avenue, McIntyre Street, and W. 44 Avenue). A portion of this
area has been annexed by the City.
The portion of the West Area of the Urban Growth Area that has been annexed by the
City is included in the 2006 and 2007 addendums and now retains the "Regional
Commercial' or "Employment" land use designations for the annexed property.
`s il Planning-Growth area
map 1
v
Stag Hwy 58
L � N
0 K 30 '4 I.liO
DATE: N —be, 20DO
o lS
— .. —................
�
; i
�.� City Bandwy �rST
Area Boundary 3�T
M i rk
STN
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
LAND USE
Existing Land Use
West Area
Existing land uses in the urban growth area are varied. Along the north side of 32
Avenue are areas of low to medium density residential development. To the west of I-
70 is industrial development along W. 44 Avenue and State Highway 58. A CDOT
maintenance facility is adjacent to SH58 at 1 -70. The area to the west of 1 -70 between
32 Avenue and 44 Avenue contains a golf course, and several old gravel pits now
used for water storage. A majority of this land is vacant and undeveloped.
Development Constraints
West Area
Few natural hazard areas are present in the planning area. The Clear Creek 100- and
500 -year floodplains generally parallel SH58 in the center of the planning area. No
other natural hazards exist in the area.
1 -70, SH 58, and Clear Creek present constraints to development by acting as barriers
to providing road, utility and other infrastructure improvements to the central portion of
the planning area. State and federal rules mandate where access can occur and the
manner in which rights -of -way may be crossed for installing utilities. Responding to
calls for service in the planning area is made more challenging by the restricted
access these barriers present.
County Plans
West Area
Because the urban growth area is currently unincorporated, Jefferson County has
jurisdiction over planning and zoning matters. The urban growth area lies within two
subareas the County has identified for planning purposes. The North Plains Plan
covers that portion of the urban growth area north of Clear Creek and the Central
Plains Plan covers the area to the south of Clear Creek.
Originally prepared in the late 1990's, the Central Plains Community Plan has recently
been updated. The process of updating this plan included extensive public meetings.
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
These subarea plans show recommended land uses in the urban growth area as
residential in existing established residential neighborhoods. Applewood Golf Course
and Clear Creek are shown as major park/recreation /open space areas. The area
along W. 44 Avenue south to Clear Creek is recommended as mixed use areas
containing office, light industrial, retail, and residential (up to 15 du /ac) uses. The bulk
of the large, undeveloped area to the west of 1 -70 is shown as industrial.
Future Land Use Map
West Area
The Future Land Use map reflects the recommended land uses for the area. The
recommended land uses were matched as closely as possible to the land use
categories contained in the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan.
The Future Land Use Map (Map 2) illustrates recommended land uses for the urban
growth area. The categories used and the definitions, desired character, and
attributes of the various land use categories shown are the same as defined on the
Structure Plan of the Comprehensive Plan and are hereby incorporated as a part of
this Addendum.
Future land uses for the planning area are shown on the Structure Plan on the
following page. The Plan establishes the following recommended land uses:
• Existing residential neighborhoods at the approximate density shown in the
County subarea plan, SF (4)
• Existing golf course parks, and the Clear Creek floodplain as parks and open
space
• Employment along W. 44 Avenue and south of SH58 to Clear Creek to include
light industrial, storage, warehouse
• The large, vacant area west of 1 -70 between 32� Avenue and Clear Creek as
Regional Commercial to include retail, employment, restaurants, hotel
The designation of "open space" is a designation to indicate the land should not be
developed. This designation does not mean that the property so depicted necessarily
will be owned by a public entity.
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive man — umanGrowh Area Addendum
November 2010
a N noaisva _
cl
-NN,
; Y
T VIN
s
m I-
¥»R G
�\
|
r
k
$
|
� �
�
\ \
._9
k
c 2
) 2
`
|
f
)
-
, r
�
'
E
wm » (| %
| j
E 7
/E
j
� ®
a
.
�
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive man — umanGrowh Area Addendum
November 2010
TRANSPORTATION
The existing street network consists of the major north -south connectors of Youngfield
on the eastern border of the planning area and McIntyre Street on the western border.
East -west connectors are W. 44 Avenue at the north and W. 32 Avenue to the
south.
1 -70 and State Highway 58 provide regional, limited access highway connections in
the area. The 1- 70/SH58 interchange was recently updated with additional ramps to
create a full- movement interchange. This work entailed relocating the current
eastbound on -ramp at 38 Avenue to the south.
Trails currently exist along Clear Creek from 1 -70 west to Golden and along 32
Avenue from 1 -70 west to Maple Grove Park.
Future Street Network
West Area
The future street network in the area will build upon the existing grid system of north -
south and east -west streets. 1 -70 and SH58 will continue to serve the dual roles of
providing access to the area and carrying regional traffic. The roadway classifications
in this plan are based upon the recommendations of the Countywide Transportation
Plan. The proposed street network for the area is shown on the Roadway
Classification Map (Map 3).
The recent completion of the 1- 70/SH58 interchange movements will improve access
to the area and increase mobility for the region. A new interchange on SH58 at
Cabela Drive has been approved to provide additional access to the area as well as a
pair of "hook ramps" that will connect 1 -70 to the collector which provides access to
individual development parcels. Improvements to the 1- 70/32 Avenue interchange to
increase capacity have also been approved.
Major east -west streets included in the future street network are 32 Avenue and 44
Avenue. Streets providing north -south connections are Ward Road, Youngfield Street,
and McIntyre Street. The new SH58 /Cabela Drive interchange has been approved
approximately one mile west of the SH58/1 -70 interchange and to the east of the
existing McIntyre interchange. Cabela Drive will connect 32 Ave. to 44 Ave. with
an interchange at SH58. Cabela Drive will also connect to the new 40 Ave.
underpass of 1 -70 which provides access to Youngfield St. The new 40 Ave.
underpass will provide an additional access to the Regional Commercial area.
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
J Nyr
i 1
1 �
�1
� t
'I 1
t
3 �
v K
y V
R
�* 5
O
NVAIOH
VNVIONI
°— m "
U ■
O) !{
c > 1
o 1
� 3
� N s
�'S N
i
s
3'dDI IV
I
I
N nVd I9
9
{
S 4
t
S
S
1
{
1
1
i
S
x $
Y
m
N t) m
� o
A m
d
o
v o
m �
o a
rc
E
0 3
a�°
_T
I
1 �
a
8
N
4 a
E
z
k IlJ
Q
D
7
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
Future Trails
West Area
The County community plans for the area show potential trails extending along W.
32 Avenue from Maple Grove Park to McIntyre and on McIntyre from W. 32
Avenue to the Clear Creek Trail. A portion of the Clear Creek Trail has been re-
located west of approximately Eldridge Street extended. A trail connection is
proposed from 32 Avenue to the Clear Creek Trail along Cabela Drive.
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
COMMUNITY AMENITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
Community Services
West Area
Services in the unincorporated portions of the planning area are currently provided by
Jefferson County and several special districts. Jefferson County currently provides
general governmental services and law enforcement. Portions of the area are
included in the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD).
A large area in the central portion of the planning area is not currently served by a
sanitation provider. A small parcel of land is not provided with fire protection.
Special districts serving the West Area are listed below.
Fire Protection Districts
• Fairmount
• West Metro
Water and Sanitation Districts
• North Table Mountain W& S
• Consolidated Mutual Water
Park and Recreation Districts
• Prospect
The City, Prospect Recreation and Park District, and the Long's Peak Metropolitan
District have entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). The IGA provides
that the boundaries of the Prospect Recreation and Park District will not be affected by
the formation of the Long's Peak Metropolitan District, any future inclusions into the
metro district, and any future annexations by the City. Coordination will be needed
among these entities to provide park and recreation services and facilities in the
growth area.
9
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
Future Service Provision
The City will provide general governmental services and police protection for any
areas annexed by the City. Because the City is not a full service City, water,
sanitation, and fire services will need to be provided by special districts in the future if
any areas are annexed. The Long's Peak Metropolitan District has been formed to
provide financing, construction, and maintenance of infrastructure within a portion of
the growth area. The Service Plan for the District sets out the services to be provided,
which include streets, water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, parks and recreation,
parking, and TV and fiber optic. The District is required to include within its
boundaries any areas within its service area that are annexed by the City.
Fire protection will continue to be provided by existing districts currently providing
services.
Water and sanitation services will continue to be provided by districts currently
providing services within their respective boundaries. Within the area currently not
served by water or sanitation districts, there are three options to consider:
• Inclusion into existing water or sanitation districts.
• Formation of a new water and sanitation district, or metropolitan district, with
provision of services by the new district.
• Formation of a new water and sanitation district, or metropolitan district, with
provision of services by another district or districts by contract with the new
district.
Provision of services by an existing or new district will depend upon the capacity of
that district to provide treated water or sewage plant capacity and the financial ability
to construct improvements. It is likely a developer will need to pay for arty
infrastructure improvements, upgrades, or expansions. Any new sewage treatment
plants or expansions must be included in the Regional Clean Water Plan and be
approved by the State Department of Public Health and Environment.
Stormwater facilities will need to be provided by developers as required by City and
UDFCD standards. Facilities will need to conform to any drainage basin master plans
prepared and adopted by UDFCD.
Parks and Open Space
Park and open space areas in the urban growth area are currently acquired and
managed by Jefferson County and the Prospect Recreation and Park District. Two
parks located just outside the growth area, Maple Grove Park and Arapahoe Park, are
provided by the Prospect Recreation and Park District.
10
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
Policies:
At the time of rezoning, the following items should be requested of a
developer, if applicable:
a. Access easements across private property to public land;
b. Dedication of private land;
c. Open space required with the development if located adjacent to public
land;
2. Open space purchases should be based on regional demand for recreation
in the area and on the goal of preserving an open character and significant
natural features.
3. The growth area is currently served by the Prospect Recreation and Park
District and the Jefferson County Open Space Department. There should
be improved communication among the district, governmental agencies,
and private organizations responsible for buying and managing public land
in the area. Continuing communication among these groups to achieve
more efficient management of public lands and a higher level of use.
Coordination among these public entities and the planning departments of
the City and the county should facilitate more effective siting of private open
space to:
a. secure access easements across private property to public land;
b. encourage dedication of private land by providing information about
open space incentive programs, and
c. suggest, where appropriate, that the open space required in a
development be located to augment adjacent public land.
4. The acquisition of undeveloped land should be related to the following
planning objectives:
a. Maintenance of important visual resources;
b. Maintenance of open spaces between developments;
c. Provision of needed recreational opportunities;
d. Protection of significant wildlife habitats and wildlife corridors;
e. Protection of areas subject to significant natural hazards, (e.g.
floodplains);
11
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
12
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
f. Protection of areas having cultural and historical significance;
g. Provision of connecting trail systems;
h. Retention of unique or relict flora, (i.e., tall -grass prairie, sites with rare
and endangered plants, and sites with high quality riparian vegetation);
i. Protection of ecologically sensitive areas;
j. Prevention of soil erosion; and
k. Protection and conservation of vegetation.
While these areas are desirable as open space, development should not be
precluded if sensitive site planning accommodates these concerns.
5. Public acquisition, management agreements between owners, and private
dedication of land to public entities, i.e., conservation easements, are only
three of the methods that could be used to increase the amount of land
which remains undeveloped.
6. Plantings in open space areas should be native or naturalized species and
should be varieties that require minimal maintenance, are drought tolerant,
and benefit desirable wildlife needs.
Trails
Existing trails have been constructed along W. 32 Avenue and Clear Creek by
Jefferson County. Future trails planned for the area include the extension of the W.
32 Avenue trail from Maple Grove Park to McIntyre and a trail along McIntyre from
32 Avenue to the Clear Creek trail. A connection between 32 Avenue and the
Clear Creek trail is proposed. These trail alignments are shown on Map 4.
The provision of trails in the urban growth area should be based on the following
policies:
Policies:
An expanded trails network should be developed that provides additional
trails for hiking, biking and equestrian use, and that precludes motorized
vehicles. These trails should:
A. vary in length, ascent and nature experience;
B. traverse diverse landscape;
C. access views and vistas;
13
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
D. intersect to allow the traveler a choice of paths to a destination;
E. avoid damaging or impairing areas containing endangered species,
fragile environments, or high hazard areas; and
F. Link communities and other Plan areas, and link these areas to
adjacent cities and open space lands along the foothills to the west.
2. Accessible trails should be provided for all citizens, including barrier -free
trails where possible, recognizing that trail users have different levels of
ability and seek different levels of challenge.
3. New trail systems in critical wildlife habitat areas, i.e. nesting and calving
areas, and wintering grounds, should be routed in a sensitive fashion,
and /or have seasonal closures to minimize impacts to the wildlife.
4. Trail corridors should be negotiated which utilize floodplains, public rights -
of -way, leased private property, parks, and public open space.
5. Liability releases should be used to remove this obstacle to the creation of
trails across private land.
6. Areas of development should have trail connections to areas of natural open
space.
7. Trails should be separated and buffered with landscaping from streets,
roads, and parking lots when possible. Landscaped buffers should be
established between the Clear Creek trail and adjacent land uses.
8. Roadway projects should provide equestrian, pedestrian and bicycle
crossings; (e.g., equestrian tunnels and grade separated bike crossings at
railroads).
9. The Clear Creek regional trail is outlined in the Jefferson County Trails
Master Plan and is complete to Golden.
10. Local trails could be jointly funded through the Jefferson County Open
Space Joint Venture Grants Program. This is a joint venture program with
adjacent cities and park and recreation districts per the City's request
depending on priorities.
11. Equestrian and jogging trails should be unpaved and marked.
14
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
12. Parking areas should be provided at trailheads to facilitate trail usage by
equestrians, hikers, bicyclists, etc.
13. Public facilities, e.g. restrooms and telephones, should be provided at major
trail intersections and significant open space sites where feasible.
14. The local park and recreation agencies should be consulted to determine
potential trail connections.
15. Developers should coordinate with public entities to provide trails and public
access along flood plains and /or easements such as ditches, roads, power
lines, etc., whenever possible.
16. Developers should provide trail connections to adjacent open space areas,
trails, schools, bus stations, Regional Transportation District park -n- rides,
and light rail stations. This includes providing a safe crossing at roads
whenever possible.
Trail Design Criteria
1. A variety of trail systems should be provided with appropriate fencing and
signage to minimize trespassing.
2. Trails should connect with others in the City and surrounding jurisdictions to
provide opportunities for commuting to other jurisdictions and to provide
multiple recreational alternatives.
3. The trails should intersect at strategic points to allow travelers a number of
choices to reach a desired location.
4. Areas containing endangered species or fragile environments should be
avoided.
5. Intersections between paths should be defined with a good visual warning of
an intersection as it is approached.
6. Trails should take advantage of the diversity of the landscape through which
trails pass. As the landscape changes, its dominant features should be
clearly seen from the paths, i.e., good observation points for views and
vistas that feature landmarks.
7. Bicycle paths should be designed for safety and be clearly marked. Safe
bicycle paths can be provided in the following ways:
A. Providing wider roadways with paved shoulders.
15
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
B. Providing off -road paths for multiple users.
C. Utilizing road, rail, ditch or power line rights -of -way or easements.
16
Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan — Urban Growth Area Addendum
November 2010
City of
Wheat
� K,d ge
MUMT DEVELOPMENT
Memorandum
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner
DATE: November 9, 2010
SUBJECT: Potential zoning code amendment re. Artificial turf
Recently, the planning division was approached by a developer who wanted to use
artificial or synthetic turf in place of living landscaping material due to the water savings
in the summer. In response to a request from a councilperson, the following is my
analysis of the issue.
Current technology: The design of artificial turf consists of a loose pile - carpet of
plastic, grass -like fibers made of polyethylene with a hole - punched backing which is "in
filled" (top- dressed) with rubber granules (crumb rubber) produced from recycled tires,
athletic shoes or other rubber sources, and sometimes with sand, depending on the
proposed use.
Fibres arc coated vAh s l kone
Laver ofrubber granules
Alp
r.lodern artificial turf
Curl, fires Frep the straight ones upright
E:-panded pol ;prup�lene base
o
Advantages of artificial turf:
• Once artificial turf is installed, it's easy to maintain — no mowing or watering is required;
• It does not require the use of pesticides or fertilizers;
• It keeps its "green" color all year long;
• The newer products have a more realistic appearance;
• It is more durable than grass and good for high traffic areas and athletic fields — fields
need less maintenance since artificial turf it isn't "torn up" like grass. The use of it can
result in fewer injuries to athletes since it is more of a stable surface than living sod.
• Placement on athletic fields allows greater usage options since it's not impacted by
inclement weather.
Disadvantages of artificial turf:
• While purported to be "maintenance free ", it does have the following maintenance
requirements:
-The turf collects leaves and wind -blown dirt and debris that must be removed.
Usually this is done with a leaf blower adding to the particulate matter in the
atmosphere. It can also be vacuumed; however, this could also remove the filler
material that would then need to be replaced.
-The turf will also get "dirty" from the dust and dirt so prevalent in Colorado and
must be washed to restore the "green" color.
• Pet feces and urine don't breakdown biologically like a living lawn allows and can result
in the growth of bacteria.
• Artificial turf doesn't provide the cooling effect of a living lawn; it becomes quite hot and
on warmer days can release a hot rubber odor — on a 98 degree day, the turf temperature
can rise to 120 degrees. This could cause issues in areas accessed by pets or children.
• The rubber filler used can contain lead, zinc, arsenic, cadmium, chromium and selenium,
all toxic chemicals.
• The use of artificial turf can result in the following drainage problems:
- Artificial turf is not as permeable as living material allowing greater run -off. This
could be equal to a bare lot depending upon the installation technique; i.e. directly on
dirt or over a gravel bed.
-The run -off may contain lead and the infill material (rubber pellets) or any leached
contaminates which could end up in a community's storm sewers and drinking water.
This is particularly true in cases of concentrated flow, i.e. swales, ditches, etc.
• Once artificial turf is used, it cannot be replaced with living material without amending
the area which was underneath the artificial turf. The old material must be disposed of.
Also, most turf products have a warranty of around 10 years, so as the material ages, it
may fade or degrade and require replacement.
2
The following matrix is a synopsis of other Front Range communities' use of artificial turf.
Municipality
Allows artificial
If so, under what conditions?
turf?
Arvada
Yes
-When part of an approved plan for recreational fields
or common amenities such as a club house.
-Can be used in backyards and sideyards not in public
view of streets, sidewalks, parks or trails
-Can be used for putting greens not larger than 400 s.f.
in size located in a side or rear yard, even if in public
view.
Aurora
Yes
-For single and two family dwellings, can be used in
front, side and rear yards depending on size of lot and
min. and max. turf coverage standards.
-For all other uses, it can be used to meet the maximum
50% non living allowance.
- Plastic or nylon indoor or outdoor carpeting cannot
be used as a replacement for artificial turf.
Centennial
No
Commerce City
Yes
- Allowed only for public or private recreation fields.
Denver
No
Englewood
No
Greenwood Village
No
Golden
No
Lafayette
Yes
- Allowed only for athletic fields.
Lakewood
No
Littleton
No
Lone Tree
No
Louisville
No
North Tenn
No
Thornton
No
Westminster
Yes
-For single family and two family dwellings, can be
used in yard areas not adjacent to a street.
-Can be used for public or private parks or open space.
-Can be used for sports fields.
Evolving technology: Certain manufacturers are now promoting the use of recyclable artificial
turf products. Instead of rubber pellets, fill material is comprised of organic and non - organic
materials, the use of which is said to be environmentally friendly and biologically safe. There are
also advances in the use of the more environmentally friendly backing materials. These new
products are said to be pet and eco- friendly, withstanding animal urine and elements, preventing
the growth of spores and bacteria within the surface. These materials do not degrade reducing the
need for periodic placement. The eco - friendly materials are not supposed to overheat in the sun
and do not contain zinc, heavy metals, or silica dust.
Conclusion: While there have been improvements to artificial turf products in the last few
years, it still appears to have negative environmental and health impacts. It is encouraging that
manufacturers are exploring products that are more ecologically and biologically friendly but the
technology has not been fully tested. For these reasons, I would strongly encourage that the
proposed use of artificial turf for anything but sports fields be unsupported by Staff at this time.
n
W