HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/24/2010wvraiA
WHEAT RIDGE HOUSING AUTHORITY
AGENDA
August 24, 2010
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4:00 P.M.
Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat
Ridge. Call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer at 303-235-2826 at least one week in advance of a meeting
if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance.
A. Call Meeting to Order
B. Roll Call
C. Approval of the Minutes: July 27, 2010
D. Officers Reports
E. Public Forum
F. New Business
1. Status of potential projects
2. Dates for tour of metro area projects
3. Wells Fargo Grant award
4. Discuss renaming of WRHA
G. Unfinished Business
J. Other
K. Adjournment
WHEAT RIDGE HOUSING AUTHORITY
MINUTES
July 27, 2010
1.
2.
3.
4.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chair Brungardt at 4:00 p.m. in the Cit�
Council Chambers of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Building, 7500 West 29'
Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
ROLL CALL
Authority members present: Cheryl Brungardt
Joseph DeMott
Kathy Nuanes (Left meeting at 5:11 p.m.)
Janice Thompson
Katie Vanderveen (Arrived 4:15 p.m.)
Others present: Sally Payne, Deputy Director
Ken Johnstone, Community Development
Director (left meeting at 5:28 p.m.
Ryan Stachelski, Economic Development
Specialist (left meeting at 5:45 p.m.)
Dick Matthews, Accountant
Betty Maybin, Cornerstone Realty
Larry Nelson, Cornerstone Realty
Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary
APPROVAL OF MINUTES — June 22, 2010
It was moved by Kathy Nuanes and seconded by Janice Thompson to
approve the minutes of June 22, 2010 as presented. The motion carried 4 -0.
OFFICER REPORTS
There were no officer reports.
PUBLIC FORUM
There were no individuals present to address the Authority.
Housing Authority Minutes - I - July 27, 2010
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Report on Financial Statements
Dick Matthews reviewed the Housing Authority Financial Statements.
B. Discussion about Fruitdale School
Ken Johnstone reported that he was contacted by the School District to see if the
Housing Authority still had any interest in purchasing the old Fruitdale School.
The selling price would be $40,000 and a decision would have to be made within
60 days. If the Authority doesn't purchase the building, the District will have it
demolished and land -bank the property.
Janice Thompson expressed concern about the feasibility of purchasing the
building considering the condition of the real estate market. She was also
concerned about the liability of owning an empty building.
Cheryl Brungardt stated that she contacted three banks in Wheat Ridge about
financing a project to turn the building into lofts. One bank required 40% pre -
sold units; another bank required 50 % pre -sold units; and the other required
excellent comparables showing these are units people would buy or they wouldn't
finance anything.
Cheryl Brungardt also expressed concern about new FHA rules that would almost
require cash buyers with the Authority bearing the carrying costs as well as
homeowner's association costs.
It was moved by Janice Thompson that the School District be notified that
the Housing Authority has no interest in purchasing the Fruitdale school
building. The motion died for lack of a second.
Joe DeMott commented that, while he was not on the Authority during the initial
discussions regarding the building, he would like to take a little more time to look
into it since there is 60 days in which to reply. Construction costs may be less
now.
Cheryl Brungardt expressed concern about abatement costs if the Authority
purchased the building.
Kathy Nuanes indicated she would like to give some more thought to the project
before telling the School District no. There may be a possibility of working with
other entities in the community. She asked Sally Payne to check with Wheat
Ridge 2020 and Ojala Construction to see if there is interest in partnering with the
Housing Authority on this project.
Housing Authority Minutes -2- July 27, 2010
There was discussion about having a market analysis done before responding to
the School District.
Joe DeMott suggested the possibility of demolishing the building and land
banking the land. Ken Johnstone said it was his assumption that the School
District would keep the land if the Housing Authority doesn't do something with
the building.
It was moved by Joe DeMott and seconded by Kathy Nuanes to direct staff to
do a marketing analysis not to exceed a cost of $4,000. The motion carried 5-
0.
C. Executive Session
It was moved by Kathy Nuanes and seconded by Joseph DeMott to enter into
executive session on July 27, 2010 to consider the purchase, acquisition, lease,
transfer or sale of real, personal or other property pursuant to Colorado
Revised Statute 24- 6- 402(4)(a). The motion carried 5 -0.
The regular meeting adjourned to executive session at 4:45 p.m.
The executive session was convened at 4:48 p.m.
Those attending the executive session were:
Cheryl Brungardt, Housing Authority
Joseph DeMott, Housing Authority
Kathy Nuanes, Housing Authority
Janice Thompson, Housing Authority
Katie Vanderveen, Housing Authority
Sally Payne, Deputy Director
Ken Johnstone, Community Development Director
Ryan Stachelski, Economic Development Specialist
Larry Nelson, Cornerstone Realty
Betty Maybin, Cornerstone Realty
Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
The executive session was adjourned at 5:40 p.m.
The regular meeting was reconvened at 5:43 p.m.
It was moved by Janet Thompson and seconded by Katie Vanderveen that
the Housing Authority direct Larry Nelson to make an offer on the property
at 7172 -7180 West 38 Avenue for a total of $400,000 with a $50,000 roof
allowance to be paid by the seller at closing with all -cash terms. The motion
carried 4 -0.
Housing Authority Minutes -3- July 27, 2010
D. Review revised Housing Authority Goals
Sally Payne asked Authority members to carefully review the revised goals to
make sure they accurately reflect the discussion from the June meeting and then
prioritize the top six Strategic Plan work items on page 7 of the Strategic Plan on
which to focus and e -mail to Sally Payne.
E. Discuss Strategic Planning Work Plan priorities
It was moved by Janice Thompson and seconded by Katie Vanderveen to
postpone discussion of the Strategic Planning Work Plan until the next
meeting. The motion carried 5 -0.
F. Tour of metro area projects
A tour of metro area projects will be scheduled for Wednesday or Thursday in the
third week of August.
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business to come before the Authority.
S. OTHER
Joseph DeMott reported that Jefferson County Housing Authority has some
properties they want to sell, some of which may be good projects for the Wheat
Ridge Housing Authority. Larry Nelson will check on these properties and report
back to the Authority.
9. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Janice Thompson and seconded by Joe DeMott to adjourn
the meeting at 6:00 p.m. The motion carried 4 -0.
The next meeting is scheduled for August 24, 2010.
Cheryl Brungardt, Chair
Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
Housing Authority Minutes -4- July 27, 2010
A i
City of
"id ge
MUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Memorandum
TO: Wheat Ridge Housing Authority
FROM: Sally Payne, Senior Planner
DATE: August 19, 2010
SUBJECT: August 24 Housing Authority Meeting
The next Housing Authority meeting is Tuesday, August 24 at 4:00pm in City Council
Chambers. The agenda for the meeting is attached.
We will discuss the status of the 38 Ave. and High Ct. offer and of Fruitdale School. I
was not able to schedule a tour of projects on dates the Authority had chosen so we will
look at new dates that I have confirmed with the project managers.
A recommendation from the Strategic Planning session was potentially renaming the
Housing Authority to a different name since "housing authority" can sometimes have a
negative connotation. I thought we could discuss this and see if there is support for
considering a new name.
As an informational item, also included in your packet is some data about Wheat Ridge
from a Housing Market Study put together by Jefferson County Community
Development Department.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
303 - 235 -2852
spayne @ci.wheatrid eg co.us
HOUSING CHOICE MARKET STUDY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Supplement to the Community Development
2010 — 2014 Strategic Plan
A Focus on the Urban County: City of Edgewater, City of Golden,
Town of Mountain View, Town of Lakeside, City of Wheat Ridge and
Unincorporated Jefferson County
3
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
Low Income & Minority Concentrations
The majority of residents within the City of Wheat Ridge (90 %) identified
themselves as being white alone, with 14% of the population being Hispanic.
Most of the minority concentrations in the City seem to run along the 1 -70 corridor
and the border of the City of Edgewater. This also seems to be true of the low to
moderate income block groups.
City of Wheat Ridge Percent of Population by Race
Wheat Fudge %Population by Floe
p V\hite Alone
■ Black or African American
Alone
❑ Arerican Indian and Alaska
Dative alone
❑ Asian Alone
■ Native Haw and Cther 1
Pacific Islander alone
ci Sorre other race alone
■ Two or rrore races
Jefferson County Community Development 31
Housing Choice Market Study 2010
f's., ,.s I AIL, --4 or,4 -- o,,.,..,nr .,f Onni dn tin n by Ra1Ca
Race
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
%
White Alone
29,603
90%
Black or African American Alone
281
1%
American Indian and Alaska Native alone
332
1%
Asian Alone
389
1%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific
Islander alone
0
0%
Some other race alone
1,587
5%
Two or more races
823
2%
Total
33,015
Hispanic
4,477
14%
City of Whea Ridge A D
Vlheat Ridge Age Distribution
9.0%
I I
8.0%
I I
7.0%
6.0% -
I
4.0 %j - - -. - - - - --
I I
3.0% f - — - - - -- — -
2.0%j
i
1.0%
0.0% -
0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25 to 30 to 35 to 40 to 45 to 50 to 55 tO 60-64 6569 70 to 75 to 80 to 85
years years years years years 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 years years 74 79 84 years
years years years years years years years years years years and
over
Jefferson County Community Development 32
Housing Choice Market Study 2010
Income & Housing Cost. Burden
The data below was used to analyze the number of households which are
housing cost burdened. The first chart indicates the percentage of families
earning specific incomes in the City of Wheat Ridge. The second chart shows the
number of families who are paying greater than 34% of their monthly income
towards their rent. These families are considered housing cost burdened. The
majority of families who are housing cost burdened are those who earn less than
$35,000 annually. 74% for those families who are renting and earn between
$10,000 and $20,000 annually are housing cost burdened. These families may
include a head of household who is employed full -time, as the annual minimum
wage income is $15,142. Families earning less than $35,000 can expect to have
issues with rental affordability if they live in the City of Wheat Ridge. A large
percentage of the City of Wheat Ridge is located in a low to moderate income
Block Group and a large percentage of the those residents who rent their homes
are housing cost burdened. The minority of residents renting and earning over
$35,000 annually are not considered housing cost burdened.
(-if %I of wnPat Ririne Household Income
Wieat Iadge Fbusehold Inoome
12%
10%
8%
6%
4% -- --
I -
2
00�
♦o ti ti $ -o �.P 40 %0 \o 40 qQ � �%o �0 69
y o b
a
Jefferson County Community Development
Housing Choice Market Study 2010
33
City of Wheat Ridoe Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income
Gross Rent as % of Household Income
Units
%
Less than $10,000
926
14%
Less than 20 percent
0
0%
20 to 24 percent
8
1 %
25 to 29 percent
30
3%
30 to 34 percent
18
2%
35 percent or more
754
81%
not computed
116
13%
$10,000 to $19,999
1213
18%
Less than 20 percent
53
4%
20 to 24 percent
8
1 %
25 to 29 percent
60
5%
30 to 34 percent
136
11%
35 percent or more
903
74%
not computed
53
4%
$20,000 to $34,999
1881
28%
Less than 20 percent
130
7%
20 to 24 percent
384
20%
25 to 29 percent
560
30%
30 to 34 percent
400
21%
35 percent or more
360
19%
not computed
47
2%
$35,000 to $49,999
1195
18%
Less than 20 percent
553
46%
20 to 24 percent
371
31%
25 to 29 percent
114
10%
30 to 34 percent
102
9%
35 percent or more
33
3%
not computed
22
2%
$50,000 to $74,999
997
15%
Less than 20 percent
740
74%
20 to 24 percent
149
15%
25 to 29 percent
69
7%
30 to 34 percent
0
0%
35 percent or more
8
1 %
not computed
31
3%
$75,000 to $99,999
326
5%
Less than 20 percent
302
93%
20 to 24 percent
14
4%
25 to 29 percent
10
3%
30 to 34 percent
0
0%
35 percent or more
0
0%
not computed
0
0%
$100,000 or more
66
1%
Less than 20 percent
66
100%
20 to 24 percent
0
0%
25 to 29 percent
0
0%
30 to 34 percent
0
0%
35 percent or more
0
0%
not computed
0
0%
Total
6,604
Jefferson County Community Development 34
Housing Choice Market Study 2010
Employment
City of Wheat Ridge Occupations
Wheat f3dge occupation
* N1ircagen professional, and related
occupations:
■ Service occupations:
❑ Sales and office occupations:
cl Farming, fisting, and forestry occupations
■ Construction, extraction, and rreinternance
occr patKxs:
* Roduction, transportation, and material
rowing occupations:
The largest majority of Wheat Ridge residents are employed in Management and
Sales occupations.
Population & Job Growth
City of Wheat Ridge Population Growth /Decline
The City of Wheat Ridge has experienced an overall population decline from the
years 2000 to 2007. According to the Denver Business Journal, job growth for
the Denver Metro Area as estimated to be 1.5% in 2007 and 1.1% in 2008.
Forecasted job growth during 2009 is estimated to be less than this with a pattern
of further decline before an increase is expected.
Jefferson County Community Development 35
Housing Choice Market Study 2010
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Amt
%
JEFFERSON
COUNTY
525,507
530,061
531,287
530,884
532,071
532,417
534,355
538,323
3,968
0.7%
Edgewater
5,445
5,497
5,439
5,373
5,344
5,292
5,260
5,260
0
0.0%
Golden
17,159
17,361
17,376
17,652
17,784
17,721
17,664
17,701
37
0.2%
Lakeside
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
0
0.0%
Mountain View
569
1 564
1 558
1 551
548
543
540
531
1 -9
1 -1.7%
Wheat Ride
32,913
32,658
32,289
31,908
31,825
31,713
31,550
31,557
7
0.0%
Unincorporated
Jeffco
1 181,666
184,625
1 185,660
1 184,956
1 185,287
1 185,531
1 186,741
188,326
1,585
0.8%
The City of Wheat Ridge has experienced an overall population decline from the
years 2000 to 2007. According to the Denver Business Journal, job growth for
the Denver Metro Area as estimated to be 1.5% in 2007 and 1.1% in 2008.
Forecasted job growth during 2009 is estimated to be less than this with a pattern
of further decline before an increase is expected.
Jefferson County Community Development 35
Housing Choice Market Study 2010
r
Commuting
City of Wheat Ridge Transportation to Work
Wheat Fridge Transportation to Work
i
V1,brked at horre
:=
other rreans
Walked
Total:
Bicycle
IV:)torcycle
12,333
Pdjic
_
Carpooled
transportation
12%
Carpooled
756
Drove alone
Motorcycle
0%
t' ;k, ..F IA /k,—# 0,*14 o T— nonnrtntinn tn Wnrl(
80% 100%
Transportation to Work
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
%
Total:
16,183
Drove alone
12,333
76%
_
Carpooled
1,912
12%
Public transportation
756
5%
Motorcycle
60
0%
Bicycle
41
0%
Walked
332
2%
Other means
78
0%
Worked at home
671
4%
A large majority of Wheat Ridge residents (76 %) drive alone to work. Only 5% of
residents utilize public transportation to get to their jobs.
Jefferson County Community Development
Housing Choice Market Study 2010
36
20% 40% 60%
City of Wheat Ridge Travel Time to Work
Wheat Ridge Travel Time To work
Citv of WhPat RirlrrP Travel Tima to IA/nr4
p Less than 30 mnutes
■ 30 to 44 mrwtes
❑ 45 to 59 minutes
❑ 60 or mxe ninutes
Travel Time to Work
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
%
Aggregate travel time to work (in
minutes): _
377,135
Le th 30 minutes
— - -- -- - - - - -- - - -
30 to 44 minutes
1 4 9,9 40
106,690
40%
28%
45 to 59 minutes
46,075
12%
60 or more minutes
74,430
20%
The majority of working residents in the City of Wheat Ridge travel less than 45
minutes to work.
Jefferson County Community Development 3�
Housing Choice Market Study 2010
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
The 2000 Census reported 14,591 total housing units within the City of Wheat
Ridge. Using an estimated 1.2% growth rate, units are currently at 16,245.
Approximately half of the housing units located within the City of Wheat Ridge
are single family, with the other half being attached units. The majority of
properties in Wheat Ridge were built between 1950 and 1980.
Citv of Wheat Pidne Hnusinn - Phvsiral ('harartari.ctirc
Units in Structure
1 -unit detached
53%
1 -unit attached
10%
2
4%
3 or 4
6 %
5to9
7%
10 to 19 - -
6%
20 to 49
8%
50 or more
5%
Mobile Home
0%
- Boat, RV, van, etc:
0%
uitV of Wheat Hedge Houslnq - PhVSical Characteristics
Year Structure Built
Built in 1999 to March 2000
1 %
Built 1995 to 1998
2%
Built 1990 to 1994
3%
Built 1980 to 1989
9 %
Built 1970 to 1979
17%
Built 1960 to 1969
Mt.
Built 1950 to 1
31%
Built 1940 to 1949 g%
Built 1939 or earlier 6%
Jefferson County Community Development 53
Housing Choice Market Study 2010
For Sale Housing
Housing Unit Estimates
55% of housing in Wheat Ridge is owner occupied housing. Therefore
approximately 8,935 units are potential for sale housing.
Attainability
The gross income maximum for cost burdened households is approximately
$35,000 for the City of Wheat Ridge. An attainable house would cost
approximately $105,000. 11 % of the housing stock in the City of Wheat Ridge
was $105,000 or less in the year 2000.
Rental Housing
Housing Unit Estimates
45% of the housing in Wheat Ridge is rental housing, therefore approximately
7,310 housing units are rentals.
Cost Analysis
20% of residents in the City of Wheat Ridge pay greater than 50% of their
household income for rent. These residents are severely housing cost burdened.
('itv of WhPat PirinP (4'rn.c.c Rent a.c a PPrrPntAnP of Hnl/.Cahnlrl InrnmP
Gross Rent % of Household Income
%
Less than 10 percent
4%
10 to 14 percent
11%
15 to 19 percent
14%
20 to 24 percent
14%
25 to 29 percent
13%
.30 to 34 percent _
10 %
35 to 39 percent
5%
40 to 49 percent
7%
50 percent or more
20%
Not computed
4%
Affordable Housing
Housing Unit Estimates
The median income for residents in the City of Wheat Ridge is $38,983.
Affordable housing in this area would cost less than $93,558; there are 98
residential units with a value less than $93,558.
Condition of Housing
All units are reported to be in good condition.
Jefferson County Community Development 54
Housing Choice Market Study 2010