Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/23/2003AGENDA October 23, 2003 Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment on October 23, 2003, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 W. 29 Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. I 3. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for anyone to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) A. ' Case No. WA-03-13 An application filed by William Hinkley for approval of a partial waiver of Section 26-501 (Parking Requirements) AND a partial waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscape Requirements) AND an increase to maximum lot coverage for property zoned Commercial-One (C -1) and located at 4892 Marshall Street. C. Case No. WA-03-20: An application filed by Jack and Paulette Cooper for approval of a 7 foot side yard setback variance from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement when adjacent to a public street resulting in a 23 foot side yard setback for property zoned Residential-One (R- 1) and located at 3 890 Hoyt Street. D. ' Case No. TUP-03-02: An application filed by Trugreen Landcare for approval of a one-year Temporary Structure Pen to allow three office trailers on property zoned Commercial-Two (C-2) and located at 8935 West 40' Avenue. A. Approval of minutes — August 28, 2003 B. Set next meeting date — December 3 or 10, 2003 DIVISION CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING REPORT TO: Beard of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: September 25, 2003 BATE PREPARED: September 1q, 2003 CASE NO. & NAME: WA- 03 -131B & B Heating CASE MANAGER: Travis Crane ACTION REQUESTED; Approval of a partial waiver of Section 6 -502 (landscape requirements), APPDXI MATE A REA: 11,060 square feet (.25 Acres) PRESENT ZONING: Commercial -One (C- 1) PRESENTLAND USE: Heating and Air Conditioning Shop SURROUNDING ZONING; N S & E: Commercial -{one W: Commercial -cane, Agriculture One SURROUNDING LAND USE: N. S & E: Office /Warehouse W: Event Center (X) CASE. FILE & PACKET MATERIAL (X) ZONING ORDINANCE () SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS N OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. MOMMUE02= II. SITE PLAN 0 Board of Adjustment WA-03-131B & B Heating Request o decrease required count of parking spaces for existing parking area on of + adjacent to the Marshall Street frontage, however, the parking spaces are # clearly t Board of Adjustment 3 WA_03 -13`B &; B Heating The existing parking area does not meet the current parking standards, as required by the Code of Laws. 111, VARIANCE CRITERIA Since Request "A" and Request "B" are interrelated, they will be discussed together in response to the following criteria. Where possible, all three requests will be combined to respond to the criteria. Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: Request A, B and C: If the requests are denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The property is currently utilized as a heating and air conditioning office and shop, and this use may continue, regardless of the outcome of these variance requests. 2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? spaces on the interior would restrict the future use of this building. 3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? Board of Adjustment WA-03-13/B & B Heating WvrrMnwc�1PWry • force customers and staff to park- in and along the right-of-way. 6. If criteria I through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? The requests would not result in a contribution or benefit to the neighborhood, and would merely be a convenience for the property owners. The requests would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Each variance will require a separate motion. Re nest A Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria are not supportive of the variance request. Staff has found that there are not unique circumstances attributed to the request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL for the following reasons. 1. A person having interest in the property has created the hardship. 2. The expansion of the building could be decreased to accommodate other landscaping opportunities. 3. There are no unique circumstances relative to the shape or topography of the property. Ra"sj_B Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria are not supportive of the variance request. Staff has found that there are not unique circumstances attributed to the request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL for the ,following reasons: 1. A person having interest in the property has created the hardship. 2. There are no unique circumstances relative to the shape or topography of the property. Board of Adjustment 6 WA-03-13/B & B Heating Board of Adjustment 7 A -03 -13113 & B Heating V f AM& or SW 13 DErAKTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15,1994 Pt ONMW ANO DEVELOFMENT L.W Revision: t o M 2001 M 6� " ll �> 0 1 A 33 31WIC% I c. O 41 Qt Qd O dt tu LU tu i I A O O Lu Q IN Mlr 4W L. HATC I 14EA 1 STORY AP�1 K7-, ME=A�4NE REOUE57 I VAPZ( FO RELIEF FROM A 11 I MUM, 207 OF LOT 5P � LA�4::) R 50APED m i REOUF57 2 VAAW4rE FOR ; fEF FROM 509 "'4AXIMUM LO 'OVERA E REOUIREMENT PER 5EO 2(,-215 COMMERCIAL - ONE Pl-. (0-1) PA;ZKING ANALYSIS M.AWMR \ vAlk PARkw� r = l A5PHALT pp L lR 7 0TA:- AREA i0,400 SQ.F-T� E-Xi$ nl�4C� BUL::*, 4400 50,FT, Cg-F =E CE APEA 5-QQ-$-QET, AWV @.3642 MAR5HA" 51 4r, 300 SQj=f FIR5T FLOOR I r I 14EA 1 STORY AP�1 K7-, ME=A�4NE REOUE57 I VAPZ( FO RELIEF FROM A 11 I MUM, 207 OF LOT 5P � LA�4::) R 50APED m i REOUF57 2 VAAW4rE FOR ; fEF FROM 509 "'4AXIMUM LO 'OVERA E REOUIREMENT PER 5EO 2(,-215 COMMERCIAL - ONE Pl-. (0-1) PA;ZKING ANALYSIS TAL PROPER pp L lR 7 0TA:- AREA i0,400 SQ.F-T� E-Xi$ nl�4C� BUL::*, 4400 50,FT, Cg-F =E CE APEA 5-QQ-$-QET, - 6 SPACES 300 SQj=f FIR5T FLOOR 3600 50F`7, MEZZA�41qF- � . . . . . . . 2400 '50,FT ST PAGE/FA3ZCA'K.)N 96 - 16 SPACES PPIOP LA� 655 50�F`T, OR ' ,�X WION 54 50 FT, OR A- 7 70 7AL ;ZEQUIRFD P NG - 16 SPACES EXT E-Wf0P PARK PPOVIDED - 6 SPACES r\C-LOES I VAN ASSESSABLE SPACE IN"rEQ'10;2 PA;ZQNG PPOVIDED -13SPACES PA2KING P20" - !9 SPACES Im /FOLhVA ,4 0, 0 5 10 2 NEW ADDITION FOR B&B HEATING 4892 MARSHALL STREET WHEATRIDGE, COLORADO 80033 WWAM J HNKLEY ARCHITECT;'H (303) - 51-4016 3001 SYJ JAMKCA COURT, #1 _ A , AURORA, CO 80014 CeQNC,Kt: i t— F U Ttof4 0 --- L u "EK--UL, -2�`l •` 4 % qb hating and —"* %,* Air Conditioning, Inc. July 15, 2003 Nomad Lawn & Property Maintenance 4890 Marshall Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 The city of Wheat Ridge requires B&B Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. to have written pennission to build next to the warehouse and use parking spaces adjacent to our building in case of overflow to be used only between Monday through Friday Tana to 5pm. With your approval, B&B Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc will take responsibility for cleaning the parking area at all times. Please sign below as acceptance and return • B&B Heating, & Air Conditioning, Inc. C Thank you in advance for your cooperation and we look forward to the new improvements soon to begin. M ACTION " • UESTED: Approval of front { a public street, and approval foot rear yard setback variance, resulting in a 15-foot rear yard setback when adjacent to a public Residential-One 4XRROUNDING LAND Residential JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case, MEENCEDU= 1710mcnagamm Board of Adjustment The existing single-family structure does not have a garage, carport, or a parking pad. The applicants currently park their vehicles on the street in front of their house. The City has received a signed petition of support from adjacent neighbors (Exhibit 5, Petition). 111. VARIANCE CRITERIA : 11 t requesis are eme , e property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The property is currently utilized as a single-family residence, and this use may continue, regardless of the outcome of these variance requests. Granting of these requests will provide a level • convenience for the applicants. 3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular and unique hardship as the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? more mature trees prevent the construction of the detached garage in the southwest comer of the property. RtqqLs��| : The requests would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties in the area. The adequate sup: «,f <.. and air would not be compromised as a result of these requests. The requests would not increase congestion in the Streets, nor increase the danger of fire. The requests would most likely not have an effect on property values in the neighborhood. 6. If criteria I through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an vidual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? B: The requests could potentially result in a contribution or benefit to the neighborhood by provng off-street parking for the applicants. This would also be a convenience for the property owners. The requests would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Each variance will require a separate motion, Request A Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the W 5 � 2,111TW-W " Jmmwt "Imas, found that there are uniave circumstances attributed to the request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons: Board of Adjustment 4 WA-03-19/Hergenreter Berard of Adjustment WA- 03- 19/Her enreter NW 2a m{ 41 aI 1 fl p L E I SW 25 VErAKTMENT Of MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 PLANNING AND DB ELOPMENT fast Revision: 5e tember 10„ 2001 mow► a» * *0 ..t w s t 00 ad fir, a4 «.t omy pa or po ar Mr d as am sue► .t d* 0* "A 44 A" WM tt " ax w::34 qtr a. «wit 1► «t aw 00 "A to • .«a� i�. is art �wr fit M �o &W *t E 3 g ' t E r.. .. ...... ... mow► a» * *0 ..t w s t 00 ad fir, a4 «.t omy pa or po ar Mr d as am sue► .t d* 0* "A 44 A" WM tt " ax w::34 qtr a. «wit 1► «t aw 00 "A to • .«a� i�. is art �wr fit M �o &W *t E 3 g ' t E 4 ,7 4 O R-H a I k WE TO W/fON lkl*l AA4Y 600cero: Tloek of lot , ow coesIdewPoe MEN= Uzmm Stan and Sharon Hergenreter 2835 Newland Court m / ^ .� / � ■ AJ1 i 4t g��� �� � � � . ��� � � .. .:�- �. . . .. .. .... ©. . �.� NAME I - - ---------- I W W-100 11M2 1 =0 W_ kyj R1 E H a ' TO: Beard of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: October 23, 2003 CASE MANAGER. Meredith Reckert CASE NO.. & NAME: Case No. 'WA -03.20 /Cooper ACTION REQUESTED: bequest for approval of a 7' sideyard setback from the 30' required setback resulting in a 2' sdeyard setback in R -1 zoning PRESENT ZONING: Residential -One (R -1) PRESENT LAND USE: Single family SURROUNDING SURROUNDING JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. Beard of Adjustment Case No. WA -03 -20 /Cooper The property in question is located at 3890 Hoyt Street and is currently utilized as a single family residence. The property has Residential-One (R-1) zoning (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map). The applicants/owners (Exhibit 2, Deed) request approval of a 7-foot sideyard setback variance from the 30' sideyard setback requirement resulting in a 23' sideyard setback adjacent to public right-of- way for Hoyt Street�. The purpose of the variance is to allow for construction of a kitchen addition (Exhibit 3, Letter • Request, Exhibit 4, Application). 11. SITE PLAN The applicants have submitted a site plan (Exhibit 5, Site Plan) superimposed on the improvement location certificate showing the location of the proposed addition on the north side of the house. The proposed addition encroaching into the required setback would measure 7' x 17 1 /2'. Although the property is oversized at around 15,000 square feet (R-I minimum = 12,500 square feet), the house was built in the northwest portion of the lot at the minimum front and sideyard setbacks (30' from both Hoyt and 39 Avenue). The property is located on a bluff above Clear Creek and it is the owners' desire to take advantage of the views to the north and northwest. A freestanding garage containing 1,000 square feet with upper story studio space is located to the east of the house. The addition would be built connecting the two structures, 111. VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance requei 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. TIM — utilizedzs a sinp-le-familv residence, and this use may 4- .10 Board of Adjustment 2 Case No. WA-03-20/Cooper from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? The request would not result in a contribution or benefit to the neighborhood, and would merely be a convenience for the property owners. The request would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Upon review of the request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the variance. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following reasons: I There is no other viable location for the addition without redesigning the interior of the home. 1 Roughly 42% of the lot is encumbered with required setbacks adjacent to public rights-of-way. 1 If the variance were not granted, an existing evergreen tree would need to be removed. 4. The proposed addition will not increase congestion in the public streets, nor increase fire danger. Board of Adjustment Case No, WA-03-20/Cooper a e XHBT ■ NW 22 j a. sal "d +`«uraa}r.f Jefferson a�4trltref + "..¢. r a # *..,. ts. ° r•ato. ant# � �tti �'RS,,e� +e�au� @ JACK RICHARD C ,OPER AND PAULETTE GILL r,,. „,. €.._...,. 3390 Hoyt Street .} said a,n,ent7t,A Jefferson a b e.l toter .._ t b V�� itl *�t }� #i' r,:, cirri. �,.# ��,# t� .. #st�r•�e� } }�rt,rr��n»t��i�vr � +�d'tl+rrr,�t (�11� » �a(kQ.CICb) v� 0 1E HE, 0REO TWELVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND) NO/100THS- •_.._____ ».._.____ C1..' . �. <, . .xx.`. -, • >att.rn. tr+tlxr.a rt ` ar r4"-Jt eptrY in honri }*.n411 »i, On -30 t,;xrtrx -. d if <� — 4 ,- txr t t ? rx. raft * =wsarl aarl ai1«wwr)wr Wl} .hear ttwantrrxl. lraviratr a } - 41 An ' t r x ^} <= 3 wr s i 't ae is }'t saran ll, x ^ary,v r�,p� awns! r+rtwl'rrt� € tttt4;tlw twain Partin* 4 . +v. > » +} },ants. tttt xr #tear a,.l ar+to"I'.nt $,,it in j oint tawtadn '. at t'tt r1$arwrrllf ywt'YSiwrrl lrrt rrr parra4 .,t ##(9t •, r.r= r =.c • >;k 4..�rn»n t #+ said <'wuntJ'.t'yl.ife ` o a anxl t*2 atr xrFtr,h = hapnR i{ Lot 11.E RESUBDIVISION OF FER1fWOOD, l ' according to the recorded plat thereof, � ` County of Jefferson, DOW i State of Colorado #M -r 3590 Hoyt Strut iato Dcw-- Fee Tntw 1 ll #1 # + k tnt„stxx ) ta , }it sratah2b anti a } *}nrrtt*nanrw^a tlrataawirr tta rrt,irot; +r it aro >.r� mt. }. »t p g6 a,e r n, f ! €^ a a n tt +rya . to arnantt,irvr arrrl re•rgantrlrrA, at =nt a, firx ws and t rx.rotl #1rr *r f ;tsxx} n ## sh +• 9 }g 3! , *3AS fi;ntl, tV k .,a r.rx•xr.z &:retti µprat *P. rltnr ktfl rt'ttafstw {tlryW auwlrl lwart l^rxf Slwrt 3rMt pai'l.vit in law+ a.r aagnnrf�', r+.t, ttr S f� .e =.f� ,. e ., t.ry . ,,..... r +aU.. =Txr- Pry #rtinner =n3 ahxl ajrliirrtr =rrar4x�a =r., � re #€ wt 1_ t� # tta 38a # Ir .» s sat w» I : 9w#s +lx =xrri3,a=+t. with tht »yrw €rrr =tsnxra o nts ­4 2 . • #,,,= r ,e .r. .r r,.t se—vn. tuna wi. AM Y #t41*1 port i'- (Itr•re »anti. }x »r — ,t. -3 . � ., •? -a +. u t,;tnt.r„+s,n:.t =;xr�:xsrx arrd#WYCt'rw^i+w ara+l wr #}'pzAw ^;Taal rzxo. . +t 21,r .x «.,...,t g:, =s . .. - ., , ., a: >a °yt art. }rl,.wlwu.v R'?�tlws^xwt prr.ant..ltt^rs w++i3 .�ru=.i . ✓ a = +ry.n ,... . , . w • r , .r. + =f at,. µr,a an +1 «feasible #a,t eta r.4 in}w*rY2wr�*r-w, to rats, q, E. : =.. nci =a* ,. ­4 „ �, « .. ,c n . m,x »°• „.e= *.- t.ar�atn «v91 ari+i tw.nr �}; the .aam wn nrasxnr =r atx+€ t..n *rt wi = P • 4 = t,. et.+r muf w4u•t ytrairt.. l +arrtarawr +. soh = +. tan—, Say+=.. EXCEPTING THEREFROM Senera3 taxes and assess- , me for 1985 and all subsequent years, easements, rights of way, reservations p# and restriction, restrictive covenants of record, if any _ r.. y,., ...... „ . ,„ s an.t }a• a3 r 7 "t the *U*4 anti. r»f r4,....r. =e„4 p r•re ” ° • .a e e # M wt } a.srytrwk +.w!' a t!!aitr'ar, aa=aznet all art 1 ♦ r r r „` t a" frrrwd,3le ra4e��YY'!}}xrd"tha first ,+uri >taat w # S: tt d7X} wX7" tii p, ,4 i .,, . ,* . . • na. -r +twaza, ;n.- ltvlethw p4' plural tlta*.rr >rrw €at. r+rnithr~.a t . ti l , xtr- .,..tr = €swrt } „ +ttrw first peat tut#ii4rwtrtx art hws hatxtl anal ."M.rxr.}.,y,t In »..,r , ^.+ d d e r o d Ronne Dorothy MI Jefferson „* 12th wlay° t Aril s of >t5 Peinhold P. Rinne and Dorothy L. Rinne t; ' April 15 1vT - r li, "» #rte » }s a2YtYatr t #zra�ut'1A r.r•+v,. 3033 E. l s t Aven4te &600 Renner. Colorado 1317205 •.'�t ^} €�✓ ✓< rwr »x Mwr }} 13493 ra1+5191t is rrr:: s� 0 October 1, 200 City of Wheat Ridge :hoard of Adjustment 7500 West 29'' .Avenue EXHIBIT 4-- LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29"' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 2352846 (Please print or type all information) Location of request (address): 3Z'1♦ I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from th. Vt owner h approved of this action on his behalf. V MMEMSM To be filled out by staff: Date received Comp Plan ' Desig. Related Cast No, • -Atom – Pre-App Mtg. Date dayof_ oclokeK .2003 RM CaseNo, Quarter Section M Case Manager 0 O t . C! i a r a t Q r C a r M i s iq v0 ant it +s, a 1 - , s® 1 56.8" CASE NO. & NAME: TUP -03- 21True re n ENTER INTO THE RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) EXHIBITS SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ( ) OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been net, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this ease. I. REQUEST 11. SITE PLAN The applicant has submitted a site plan showing the proposed location for the temporary office buildings (Exhibit 5, Site Plan). The property has operated as a lawn care company and may continue this use pursuant to Section 26-204 Zone District Use Schedule. The applicant has submitted floor plan drawings as part of the application (Exhibit 6, Floor Plans). 111. VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a Temporary Use request. The proposed temporary use: 1. Will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use; and The potential temporary office trailers will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties. The adequate supply of light and air will not be decreased; the temporary trailers will not increase congestion in public streets or the parking lot. There will still be adequate parking for customers, and none of the drive aisles will be restricted. The trailers will not increase the danger of fire. 2. Will not adversely affect the adequate supply of light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution, or cause drainage problems for the general area; and The adequate supply of light and air will not be compromised. The temporary trailers should not produce any pollution of air, water or noise in the area. There should be no drainage problems associated with this request. The site is adjacent to Clear Creek, but the proposed location for the temporary trailers is outside of the floodplain. 3. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off site; and The proposed temporary trailers will not increase traffic congestion or traffic hazards. There would still be adequate parking for customers and drive aisles will not be blocked as a result. 4. Will be appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties; and 5. Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools, and other public facilities and services. The potential temporary trailers will not be detrimental to existing streets, nor overburden any utilities, parks, schools or other public facilities. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the temporary structure request. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed • this request that would warrant approval of a temporary structure. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons: Approval of the temporary structures would not alter the essential character of EM I ze PARCEL/LOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) - - - WATER FEATURE DEFART TENT OF PLAWN6 AND DEVELOPMENT . . • i 1 - �cff a 1.1.r*y, - NE 22 QD I "- I I AL LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29 Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Address 'INI. Phone 3 State _ff,a_'Zipj2_e Fax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary. post public hearing signs. and will receive a cop) of the staff report prior to Public Hearing,) Location of request (address): g 1111 =111 !111 I'll I I =111 111 111 =pl F l�Iiiii� Detailed description of request::7--r-- Signature of 0 T-A, A rrrto me this 21d. �A. t . Pu fic y commission expires To be filled out by staff: Date received Related Case No, Fee SY/6"10 Zoning Pre-App Mtg. Date—& October 3, 2003 EXHIBIT EXHIBIT 5 Field Street C, o O � rh r = J T Wads wont) 3Nd. 7 i r' ti) C4 N r .J �+ LA 1 - u N ~ L ri i i i m � A I 0 i O 1 y o � m 0 �. < �0 CD 1 21)' U) W _I N (D 0 n N O I �C-1 1 �0 Z7x1ti' - ' 1 v i o n) fJ � ► � O✓ �. Ti CD � � l Ln r N Q1 W I 0 n CD '1 � 70 / 12 x1 3 LO 4 N to T \� I ?, s I \ Y h � A - X X — '.l EXHIBIT 6 N W y Staff Present. Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Mike Pesicka, Planning Technician Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment Page t 08/28/03 B. Case No. WA-03-17: An application filed by Janina Orcholski for approval of a I 0-foot front yard setback variance from the 30-foot front yard setback requirement resulting in a 20-foot front yard setback for 1� roperty zoned Residential-One B (R-IB) and located at 10595 West 38' Place. This case was presented by Mike Pesicka. He entered all pertinent documents into the record which were accepted by Vice Chair HOVLAND. He advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the case and reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval of the case for reasons outlined in the staff report. Board Member ECHELMEYER stated that he recalled this case was presented to the Board five or six years ago, Mr. Pesicka stated that a thorough check of records indicated that this is the first such request for this property. Vice Chair HOVLAND stated that he recalled a similar case in this neighborhood. Adam Orcholski XUW91w.h-, "_ all . wlicant) because she does not speak English. He was sworn in by Vice Chair HOVLAND. Roger Weis Champion Contractors Mr. Weis, representing the contractor, was sworn in by Vice Chair HOVLAND. He stated that he had nothing to add to Mr. Pesicka's presentation. He submitted photos of sunrooms similar to the one planned to be built for Ms. Orcholski. _rm�71 TOM 79? in response to a question trom J�Mffm his mother has lived in the present location for the past ten years. He further stated that this is the only application for a variance that his mother has submitted to the city. In response to a question from Board Member BLAIR, Mr. Weis stated that the propos addition would absorb the present entryway. i Board of Adjustment T Page 2 08/28/03 board ITlember SCHULZ asked if the room would used primarfiFy the surnme.- Mr. Weis replied that the applicant could use the room year-around because ull-code electric is planned • be installed which would allow the applicant to install electric baseboard heating. case even in light of the house being located on a corner lot. Upon a motion by Board Member SCHULZ and second by Board Member BLAIR, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and " I , I a be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA- 03-17 a hereby is, APPROVED. Type of Variance: A 10-foot front yard setback variance from the 30-foot front yard setback requirement resulting in a 20-foot front yard setback to allow construction of a 10 -foot by 15-foot sunroom. For the following reasons: 0 Town, appearance of the home and was pleased that the addition would absorb the present entryway. pq 6. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to come before the Board. 7. NEW BUSINESS Minutes of July 24, 2003 — It was moved by Board Member HOWARD and J seconded by Board Member ECHELMEYER to approve the minutes of July 211 2003 as presented. The motion passed unanimously. I Board of Adjustment Page 4 08/28/03 • Board Member BLAIR informed the Board that he would not be present for the September meeting. In response to a question from Board Member HOVLAND, Ms. Reckert stated th two positions (planner and building inspector) will be eliminated from the Community Development Department in October. I PAUL HOVLAND, Vice Chair Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment Page 5 08/28/03 TO: Board of Adjustment I SUBJECT: November/December Meeting Schedul" V 11 ATE: October 17, 2003 Staff would like the Board to confirm its concurrence with canceling the November 27" meeting and holding one meeting either on Wednesday, December 3 or Wednesday, December 10, 2003. This meeting would be held in lieu of the two other meetings. CADocurnents and SeltingsA Docutnents\Kath)i',BOA\MtgmemosGiov-decinectingO2,wpd November 2003 November 2003 S M T W T F S December 2003 ' ' S M T W T F S a i I - 1' 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 910111213 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 16 17 1819 20 21 22 2122 23 24 25 26 27 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 30 Mandy T ay Wed ay uesd Sat/Sun November 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7:00prn Planning Commission 7:30prn ZOA-03-16/ Public head 8:00prn ZOA-03-17/ Exp. of deve 8:30prn ZOA-03-18/ Temp. bairn 10 12, 13 14 15 7;Oopm City Council 7:30prn Do not schedule anything! 5:30prn Urban 16 Renewal 17 18, 19, 20 21 22 7 :00 prn city Council SS 7:00pm Planning Commission 23 24 , 25, 2,6, 27, 11 28 29 City 6uricil 7:30pm WZ-02-03/ 7:00prn Housing Hinkle (2nd) Authority 8:00pm ZOA-03-13/ 7:30prn Board of PI Cost 5:30pm Urban Adjustment Recovery (I Renewal 30 8:30pm ZOA-03-14/ Authority PUD's (Ist) 9:00pm ZOA-03-15/ Chart (1st) Kathy Field a 1 VIIff GV 1w December 2003 • S M T W T F S # January 2004 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 F"MIMMEM M - 2 9 1 1 1M 7:00pm Planning Commission A 091911*41 Kathy Field 2 10/17/2003