Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/24/2000ElEft Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment on August 24, 2000, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 3. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for anyone to speak on any subject n appearing on the agenda.) i A. Case No. WA-00-06: An application filed by George E. Collings for approval of a 5 foot variance from the required 15 foot combined sideyard setback for an individual lot for the purpose of constructing an attached garage addition for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 8920 W. 32 Avenue. I I pp I III III I I I I I I 111111 1 '1111 1 11 1 C:xKatliy\BOA`Agetidas\000824,wpd renu=-`1111 III Irani II III'l ' iiii Iii jim= ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a 5' side yard setback variance from the required 15' combined side yard setback for an individual lot in an R-2 zone, reducing the overall setback to 10' for the purpose of constructing a garage. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 8920 West 32' Ave. PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING- Single-Family Residential Residential I -A K, & W: R-2, Residential-Two & Open space August 10, 2000 August 10, 2000 JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. MONECUMM The property in question is located at 8920 West 32nd Ave and is currently being used for single- family residential. The property is zoned R-2, Residential-Two. (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map). The applicant is requesting approval of a 5'side yard setback variance from the required 15'combined side yard setback for an individual lot in the Residential-Two zoning district. (Exhibit 2, Application and Exhibit 3, Deed). The purpose of the variance request is to allow for the expansion of the attached garage on the west side of the residence. 11. SITE PLAN 11HIlly TM applicant has also submitted a site plan snowing Ine Tayoul or Me on the lot and the location of the proposed garage addition (Exhibit 5), The elevations for the proposed addition show the architectural compatibility with the existing home (Exhibit 6). The property was purchased by the applicant in 1954 and developed with a single family home. The single family structure has a small attached garage for I car on the west side of the building. The proposed addition would provide an additional parking space for I more car. 111OW-k-4 ch causes the required side yard setback along the western property line to • 10. The proposed attached garage addition will encroach into this required minimum 10' side yard setback by 5'. Therefore, the garage addition will be located 5 feet from the neighboring property to the west. e-reouested variance (Exhibit 7). 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? Board of Adjustment Page 2 WA-00-061Collings if the request is denied the property may still yield a reasonable return in use. The property currently has a one car garage, and has sufficient parking for additional vehicles. It is currently developed with a single family home and can continue to • used as such, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? bins Ill VM=# still meet the required 5' minimum side yard setback. The proposed structure will be consistent in construction and design with the existing structure, therefore should not alter the essential character of the locality. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? I o g in the same zning classification ma a similar variance. Each twdvtr application is reviewed on a case • case basis and evaluated based on the circumstances pertaining to each request. fl. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property The purpose of the request is not based on a desire to make money out of the property. The request is based on the desire to provide additional covered parking for the residents. Board of Adjustment Page 3 WA-00-06/Collings 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? MMS EM 1: !1 F IMIN I I injurious • other property or improvements in me area. I ne TITUATTITTIN OT11TV1116 UNPIPIT"I an R-2 zoning district is 40% of the overall lot area. The existing single family home with the proposed addition will be well within that limitation. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed attached garage structure should not impair the adequate light and air to adjacent properties, nor endanger public safety. The new addition will meet the minimum 5' side yard setback. The requested variance does not involve additional housing units therefore will not increase traffic. The proposed garage would provide an individual benefit to the home owner. It would p o VMT-rYO�� i-♦ , 3aA6-t44% It would not result in the reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. OFFICIAL 11 ZONE ENSTRICT WuloRy ZON I NC-7 MAP -PARCEL/1-OT 50UIsMY HEAT RIDG7E VE54G+tetTE5 01^1NER5141P) CITY LIMIT LINE COLORADO WATS;� FEATUFM DENOTES MA #DORE55SES MAP ADOPTED June 15, Iq94 Lost Revisiom F 8,19q5 LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Planntn, and Dc� ciopment Department = = 5+ (r Went 29th Avenue, Wheat Rfloc. CO 60)3 Phone ;303 23;3 -2` 4 Rerarded clork,//, Nl- NO. 59 -1 ItECj)jtj)Ejt',S Titis Dvv�D, ll— 21 th 43Y a If Auilu5t hkI - i. l 4 our 1r,t —v iJjne hundred Ao tfIlyw FQUR (1954) "i Thy (:-O,ty Of and State Of t 'A ...... l- M 0" 6"t t enet, It.4 1'uL—'1NGSand 3-1hLEY E. CULANG; ('Imoty Of Jr Fl iZON a nd Stilt of Colorado, of tilt Wood Pert: WITNESSETM lhm the "li, I Pa r , i c.4 o f t h e fi part, for and in consideration of flat sum Of ail/ 160 A, a, w t k It a * a ro.j ot! gorst j , n ,j vii? rte con�;Iderrtt-ons 4 part ot hau If Paid i the said parties of the iectyn,f Pa rt, the recriPt whereof is cnnveyol, awl by these presents do cA, have g rautvl, bl, � V414 And p t —d ;,wl .6"t ... wl,,Ig d parti's of lite second part, not ill tcnamcy in conOnaft but m Fes i I. ....... ;"It, ("ovvy And Voxaiml unto Illh &;6 and I and assigns o f suc survivor forever, all rite County folloo of I-W tv,,mwy, the, "urviv"r �j them, Owir as,ign% j—, "d-1 b,� S pared 5 of land, s ituatc, 1VOIR and bcing tit the ' and State, of colrado, to-wit: Lot . j. View Sulrllvi icnl C of jeff�rson State of Colort-tio. C. 8 D-s 13 T M 1 OGIER evill, all and owuLlr And "'ret I t "' belo " a '"' Or in anyw ill apt I X I * .. 11K I ... e t h e d m, r,vcr,i-vs, remainder anti rvmaiodcr , rtnts, k—ca A- prt,flts limm and ': inlo- k, w, t :-4 J"oalld \,h3tcwvvr of the sai't pa,li Of'jtio first part, tither ill U,x (it L I,, IlId to the 0-- 1,;av 6-A prel36 ,, with the hCrolitamcutI, 3e4 applirl'Om,ces, purtelmuc", "M,t 11'a I TO HAVE AND TO 110 �D OW I�Iid Prel"kei Above lIlr A nd with the at, s;6,1 lite vsc,nsd part, the i« urvivur Of thcril, their as,ign% and Cite heirs ag ,d of euc 4 nrvkor, for,-ver, , And itu, s:,i4 Part ies Ill lire fi p forte Islites trfei heir' excrutors, wl�l �- 1,, ' c ... ta tter graw , bar;�!rul-orn agree it) ant with the said parties I the — P" Io` ', t1l" o f 111 It 0 4— al"I 0,v h—, (If such survivor, that at the tint of Cite " a nd dclivcry of these ' # they vre —H -- -f 0,v pr'lukri above cooleryV4, as of fl ,d, surk pvric,l, a" I ;m4fea"I'le C,tut, If inheritanvQ, i" I'm. it, ice s , uq4e tnd I'Mait-1 ri full po—r aml k'i'll Awl-foy lo, harg.141, -11 3.4 C"nv— the sa-C n, ma"orr and foml aforesaid, anti filar the % are free l cj {- a ll f*Tncr And Other % ;tn of wls3tcvcr kind or n4tury —vver, r S e — Except Genera, I.p1`1 b� tu, Ye,;' f,,�r' '-1)54 anit !�ub 40 U 0 it t � vie, awl Ill't Above barg,tnml proms" ill the quiet and p I eacrable potsession of tile i jol parties a the t ccond p,Ot, the s of ihem, their a&siuos InIj jj}c heirs Awl allig"s Of Inch 50i'vivor, agan"t all aml V'Cry prt,,04 or prr—us lawfully claiming or to claull the Wholl! Or any Part thercut, the *aid Part ie)f It I Ic first part shall and will WARRANT AND FORrVER 1313FEND, 411, their hand j And IN WITNESS WHEREOF tile said Part ie3 of the firo part l� ve hCre" aril 3 the 'Lly m"t y rar fist al,—v wratan. Sword, Saal,4 ­4 1 l,hvvr,4 the Pr-",tr M (SEAL) _0#�4 -ALj . .......... JSL .............. SEILI r4 OF C01-()RAM), r don County o f Jc: f• 0 as Z k now l e d gt d before me this day of f—• W thstrument was AC SAlIl Y.I EST and CLARA M- W&;T * Ceaxad fir' 1 Witness a it And And oflici, I -41. 1AY UUM134jott 29# 106 U #%,, 0",-n 0.1o, ar ar ,Pat 4�rjvtioa; fit by at War at Me I aaalknit IL—Stolatory Considering the above information, we are asking the board to grant this variance to the 5115' Side set back standard, so we can build the garage addition according to the drawings that are submitted as a part of this packet. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or comments. Thank you for your time and consideration. Since ely, George E. flings and Shirley Collings 8920 W. 32nd Ave. Wheat Rid e, CO 80033 303 233 -0,93 a M I rrquite" tv rnaiv-n existing foundation with brick !If ledge. f 4 F3 /7"o I Four inch concrete stab floor to match existing floor. 4 Exterior wall to be framed construction 2' x 4' on 16* enters, 314* COX Plywood sheathing, ir2* air space with 4' brick veneer as existing walls 5. Extend hip roof framing in like manor of existing 2* x 6' ceiling joists on 24' 0 C , 2* x 6* rafters 24' OC, I collar ties. 6, Roof sheathing 3/4' plywood to match existing, 7, Roof covering A-3 tab composition shingles with 2 layer 15# felt. 8 install new 7' x 16' overhead garage door with steel I-beam header, 9- Install new 3'0* x 6'8* man door with IT header, at west side of overhead garage door. /0_ r *_14 M. rw • • • • I L2 YPK� X i a f t } City • Wheat Ridge Board • Adjustment Planni and Development Department 7E, 2 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 re- variance request lot 8; Distant View, County of Jefferson; State of Colorado w. City • Wheat Ridge Board • Adjustment Plannin and Development Department 7500 9 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 i 1: oil - 9 We the property owners of 8800-8900 W. 32nd Ave, (lot 9; Distant View; County of Jefferson, State of Colorado), Richard and Mardell Horn, are aware of the proposed variance request for an addition to thegarage at 8920 W. 32nd Ave. We have no objections to this addon and ask that Board • Adjustment grant the request to the vartance. City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment Planni and Development Department 7500 . 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 re: Variance request, lot 8; Distant View; County • Jefferson; State of Colorado To Whom It May Concern.- City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment Plann and Development Department 7500 V 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Minutes of Meeting July 27,2000 The following is the official set of Board of Adjustment minutes for the Public Hearing of July 27, 2000. A set of these minutes is retained both in the office of the City Clerk and in the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Wheat Ridge. 3. PUBLIC FORUM There was no one signed up to speak. I 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. TUP-00-03 - An application filed by Beth Eden Centenary Baptist Church for approval of a temporary use permit for two office trailers to accommodate church staff during construction of the new church office building for property zoned R-2 and located at 2600 Wadsworth Boulevard. This case was presented by Mary Austin. She reviewed the staff report, presented slides Board of Adjustment Page 1 07127/00 She advised the Board that there was jurisdiction to hear the case and then reviewed the criteria used to evaluate a TUP request. Staff gave a recommendation of approval for reasons outlined in the staff report. Board Member ABBOTT inquired about restroom facilities. Ms. Austin replied that one of the trailers will have restroom facilities. Roger Vauter 3605 West 94th Avenue, Westminster Mr. Vauter, representing the applicant, was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He explain -oy,4h;-- office and staff whWilel new church office is being constructed. I Board of Adjustment Page 2 07/27/00 For the following reasons: 1. It will not have a detrimental effect on the general health, safety and welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 2. It will not impact the light and air to adjacent properties. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0 with Board Members MAURO and ECHELMEYER absent. Chair HOWARD advised the applicants that the request for temM orary use permit was APPROVED. I 5. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair HOWARD declared the public hearing closeol Board of Adjustment Page 3 07/27/00 • A. Appointee to the 11ftilrd, of Adjustment - Alan White informed the Board that Kent Young (District IV) has been appointed to the Board and will be present at the next meeting. B. Annroval of Minutes - It was moved by Board Member HOVLAND and seconded by Board Member MONTOYA to approve the minutes of June 22, 2000. The motion carried 4-0 with Board Member BROWN abstaining and Board Members ECHELMEYER and MAURO absent. 8. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member BROWN and seconded by Board Member HOVLAND to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 p.m. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0 with Board Members ECHELMEYER and MAURO absent. �ffl 0 1*14 IN I • =1 Board of Adjustment «� ��! �� �'� �� ilia ���� �4 NMI W= City of Wheat Ridge Memorandum .... ...... .............. .. . ..... .... . . TO: Board of Adjustment W SUBJECT: September Meeting Date DATE: August 18, 2000 le - II'l T • I Talun yoTT le noer Te fiell • since another meeting has been scheduled for the same evening in the City Council Chambers. Since a suitable location would be difficult to find, staff recommends the meeting date be changed to Wednesday, September 27 (one day earlier) in the City Council Chambers at 7:30 p.m. Please note that Court will be in session that evening as well.