The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/24/2004HIM 01 AGENDI June 24, 2004 CIP-M - "M V 71, MTWTP� M I I t IT= of Adjustment on June 24, 2004, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 W . 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 3. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for anyone to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) A. Case No. WA-04-03: An application filed by Crawford Holding Corp. for the Estate of Rosemary & Pete Ricci for approval of a 206 square foot variance from the 9,000 square foot minimum lot area requirement to allow a two-family dwelling unit on property zoned Residential-Three (R-3) and located at approximately 3 821 Otis Street. A. Approval of minutes — May 27, 2004 M CITY OF WHEAT RID P LANNING Board of Adjustment CASE MANAGER: Jeff Hirt LOCATION OF REQUEST: Approximately 3821 Otis Street, Lot 6 Aril Subdivision APPLICANT (S): Crawford Holding Corporation I tw' ! $ t # R M ,�,� R-C -t All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The property in question is located at approximately 3821 Otis, or Lot 6 of the Anel Subdivision. The prope"I has Residential -Three (R-3) zoning and is currently vacant with no structures on The .Ni Crawford Holding Corporation (non-owner) requests approval of a 206 square foot variance on the property zoned Residential-Three (R-3) (See Exhibit 1, Application, Exhibit 2, Survey). 11. SITE PLAN The property is 8,794 square feet, or .202 acres. The property measures 76.83 feet wide, with a curvilinear eastern property line creating a depth of 146.98 on the north and 93.2E on the south (See Exhibit 2, Survey). 8,974 square feet. As a result, a variance of 206 square a two-family dwelling unit on the property. Per the Code of Laws, the director of community development can approve, • deny variance requests of 10 percent or less from the development standards administratively, provided that no additional dwelling units would result from the approval of the variance. This variance request is approximately 2 percent, however approval • the request would result in additional units, therefore it is required to go to a public hearing before the Board of Adjustment. Board of Adjustment 2 Case WA-04-03/Crawford Holding Corporation Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The property could be developed as a single-family residence without the need for any variances. 2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? I p N =-ROM tujcxc�i 111tallux were granted, it would not negatively effect the character of the area. ITMIM21 Iwo - not MEET me irliurri lot iNurcmcnt VY wru bokuizre�-T-!�cr me k--tt" u "wb m 5Q.115LUXI . Ma1w, family dwelling unit. S. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood? 6. If criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? The request would not result in a substantial benefit • contribution to the neighborhood, although a relatively unmaintained vacant lot would be developed. It is the opinion of staff that development of the Board of Adjustment 3 Case WA-04-031Crawford Holding Corporation property would be more desirable than a vacant, relatively unmaintained lot and that granting the variance LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29"' � Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 01 4OR (Pleaw print or type all information) Applicant t A er (f& /OS ddress o --- City State Zi !j-o0Cl Fax 3-a:x q t4t` 53'Z'Z Owner Tx'i; A k, -M set— i c Address Phone State-- Zi Fax Contact 410A Aet $'I Address �:z Ivlzi- A" Phone 3-3� K-We-r, city_ State—(,,Q zip Fax (Tbr person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application. provide additional information when necemey, post public hcarm& signs, and will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public 11caring,) Location of request (address): S -- ----- --------- Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed Wow which pertain to your request): Application sabodual requirentews on revene side • Change of zone or zone conditions 0 Special Use Permit • Consolidation Plat 0 Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) C: Flood Plain Special Exception 0 Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) * Lot Line Adjustment 0 Right of Way Vacation * Planned Build iro P in C 9 U 13 Temporary Use, Building, Sign * Site Development Plan approval AVariance/Waiver (from Section * Othec Detailed deVption of request: A A— /71 e- 1,ir` ,Kequirce imormanon: Assessors Parcel Number 1 90 3ztj 3'11 0/ Current Zoning a ° 3 Current Use: c c ^ t- Size of Lot (acres or square footage): $f 7 "1 Proposed Zoning: 4_1 W= To be filled out by staff: A— Caw No, Date received 1( Comp Plan Desis' Quarter section M Related Cw No CaSeManagcr__ EXHIBIT 3: DEED 2c.26C�4 2,46PM S`S W,S" 40:6627 F 2 ■ 340AW, , W .ter a auuaft WA 9006 04 ma ti wa, mama a " r* OWWO .wow. w zat e, AM *W#ot is is ft* 733 at 3age.339 �t.wwrwwa�s�w .« r vowmad ar �t. "I .a aaa war nor . ■ EXHIBIT 4 -4 INFORM PR OB A TE OF A NX INFORMAL REPR ESENT A TIVE #F i Fmb COW " b.. {. 6: ♦. tR vi " t' :.i l .f!# W �. • 1* t M ?� i tl tl e lwLJ4J*LUl' �� Ll i I 1 1 � 1 � i 1 11" 1 a � Jun 08 04 08:26a FRANK CAMINO Jut— ! 2004 1:03PY k—*3lrscvr-, � �' Co�cr_t-fl\ I (303) 456-6084 P-1 N0,228c p i k , Zlot� 4 0 100 Feet EXHIBIT 6: AERIAL y. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Minutes of Meeting May 27, 2004 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair BLAIR at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Cham of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29 Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. I 2s ROLL CALL Board of Adjustment 05/2710$ Travis Crane stated that Board Member ABBOTT was correct in his understanding that the entire existing structure is located four feet above the 100-year flood elevation. Hr #T;FTB 1�2 the motion: 5. The dwelling currently exists in its entirely in Zone AF of the floodplain so if any of the "items to consider" would currently exist, they would also exist for the addition. 6. The entire "main level", both living area and garage currently exist at four feet above the flood plain level. The amendments were accepted by Board Members BELL and MOLNAR. The motion passed ". 5. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair BLAIR closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. 6. OLD BUSINESS There was ♦ old business to come before the Board. A. Approval 2f MinuLq — It was moved by Board Member HOVLAND and seconded by Board Member BELL to approve the minutes of March 25,201 as presented. The motion passed unanimously. M1 MOMML-5Z Board of Adjustment -3- 05/27/04 4 A DJOURNMENT ABB It was moved by Board Member HOWARD and seconded by Board Member t adjourn the meeting w m otion C +► 7 I �� 05/27/04