HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/26/2001CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AGENDA
April 26, 2001
Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Board of
Adjustment on April 26, 2001, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council chambers of the Municipal Building,
7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado,
3. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for anyone to speak on any subject n
appearing on the agenda.) i
A. Case No. TUP-01-01: An application filed by Walmart for a 30-day temporary use permit
for the purpose of conducting an outdoor garden sale at the property located at 3600
Youngfield Street and zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD),
B. Case No. WA-01-01: An application filed by Shayne Ankoviak for approval of a 12 foot
side yard setback variance from the required 15 foot side yard setback resulting in a
proposed 3 foot side yard setback for the purpose of constructing a garage addition for
property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located at 12141 West 32 d Drive.
D. Case No. WA-01-05: An application filed by Paul Mintken for approval of a 12 foot front
yard setback variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a proposed
• foot front yard setback for the purpose of constructing a garage addition for property
located at 3071 Union Street and zoned Residential-One
E. Case No. WA-01-0► : An application filed by Schultz Industries, Inc., for approval of a
variance of Section 2.3.7.5 of the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual to allow
prefabricated metal siding for a new building on property located at 13451 West 44 1h
Avenue and zoned Planned Industrial Development
rf II;111310
A. Approval of Minutes: October 26, 2000
8. ADJOURNMENT
C�'\Katliy\BOA\Agenda,s\010426,wpd
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been net,
therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
1. REQUEST
The property in question is located at 3600 Youngfield Street and is currently used for Commercial
purposes. The property is zoned PCD, Planned Commercial Development (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map),
Staff has received objections to and public comment regarding this variance request. A total of five phone
calls were made to the City
• complain about this proposed Temporary Use. Three of the respondents
were concerned about late night deliveries and trucks idling behind the store very late at night. Two of the
respondents were concerned about the trash behind the development.
ffiffiffiN, IN
; — Y
F9PI SeT as a resul 0 is temporary garden
sale. There should not be any pollution of air, water or noise in the area. The drainage should remain
unaffecteM by this garden sale.
3. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading,
service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off site; and
4. Will be appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering,
screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the
surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties; and
5. Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools, and
other public facilities and services.
The potential temporary use would not be detrimental to the street capacities, nor overburden any
utilities, parks, or schools.
Board of Adjustment Page 3
TUP-01-O l/Wal-Man
Board of Adjustment Page 4
"TUP -CPI -QIf at.11art
i
I
4 S
W
EXHIBIT
f
0
LAND USE CASE PROCESSSING
Pl;:nn:n; at -.c e =, eicprrie t Depairtr:ent
, 29th ,-e: , Wheat Ridge, Rid e, O X
Phone 203) 2 3,° 9546
M
#scant l + ° r P� c
tr C. Addres
State c— o Zip — 2211_ Fax `3)&5 - i 0 `700
Phone L{
Cher
State co
Zip
003 �
Fax cad ° � tZc�
'-eC71
Tv pe of action requested ,cfieck one or more of the actions listed below which pertain t regilest.t
Owner
Phone
Sate Zip Fax
Contact C.
:address `fib Phone
State c— o Zip — 2211_ Fax `3)&5 - i 0 `700
e person Gis;ed _ contact wall be contacted to answer
gttesucins regarding :his applicauon, provice addicionai € foririiaticn .Ynel teccewsar=
coat public hearing. signs. and 'vill ri - Mve a copy at
"he staff report prior to Public Hear:ng,
i
Lccat`cn -It r - e " `f-ess' -!' 600
'-eC71
Tv pe of action requested ,cfieck one or more of the actions listed below which pertain t regilest.t
.Aiop ica tiotX 4%lbmitral t*equii°emenrs on reverse side
Chance of zone or zone conditions
Special Use Permit
Conditional Use Permit
' subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
Consolidation Plat
Subdivision: 1csr than 5 lots
Flood Plain Special Exception
, Preliminary Final
lnterpretar.icn of Code
Street Vacation
_ Lot L me ,4 c,,;: iz sent
Temporary Use, Building,Sicn
=nforrtlina l�s eChan e
t'
Variance Waiver (from Senon
Purred Building Gaup
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
., Ste De��eic oment Plan approval
tither:
;"�
De°.ai.eo descr inticn of the request:
f ac t , tai .ct c, ^ `I ,A
Required information:
ASlessors P'ar'cel Number: Size of Lot iacres or square footage-
Current Zoning; Proposed Zoning:
Current rise: Proposed use:
be ac-orricilished, Apphcants other than owners musk submit power ey from t, -
4
i� • «�
.*;t
a
1 *0 1 h Ir 4
He also commented about the "trucks" delivering too early, too late, all the time and trucks idling
too long. I asked him to clarify whether they were garage trucks or delivery trucks, but it didn't
seem to matter to him what they were.
On 3/ received the following calls regarding Case No. TUP-0 1 -€31:
George Schreiber
3375 Wright St.
Mr. Schreiber is against the TUP due to the already excessive traffic behind Walmart.
Dick CuIna
3803 Wright St,
Mr. Culna has no problem with the TUP, however, he does have a problem with the trash
(Walmart bags) that blows on his property and the trucks delivering late at night (12-1 a.m.) and
running all night.
Ralph Santangelo
3801 Wright Ct.
Mr. Santangelo is opposed to the TUP. He also went before City Council on 3/19/01 to publicly
voice his opposition.
On 4/17/01. 1 received another call from Dick Culna at 3,803 Wright St. regarding Case No. TUP-
01-01:
Mr. CuIna has a problem with the trucks delivering late at night (12-1 a.m.) and running all night.
W I kw
FROM: Alan White, Director • Planning and Development
111 1 11 Min I
DATE: 14 March 2001
Pursuant to Section 26-115 (D) • the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, the Zoning Administrator is
empowered to decide upon applications for a thirty (30) day temporary use permit, without
requirement
• public hearing, provided that the following conditions are met:
If all the conditions above are met, the director of planning and development may issue a one month
temporary permit, provided the findings of fact below are met:
#
M
Note: If the use is conducted for 30 days in conformance with the approved plan and any conditions,
the applicant may apply for an additional 30 day permit (not to exceed 2 renewals) prior to expiration
of this permit,
0 0
W
-0
ON
4
I
�z LL- A\jc-- z
APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AMENDED FINAL PL - AN
OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AMENDMENT IS. P-YIslr 4
f A MMCl
-5
k2m"
mc�R
Is
CONSTRVC'nON - XLY 1, 1994
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUC'noN - F ESpUApy, 1995
PAN
T-RE Aw RAr
— — — — — — — — — —
- — -- — — — — — — -- — — —
1*
-1—
AL*MART'
7 -
YaMMYu
#wr Aftl "I'll, - % I
Rues
X 1\ I
-R, 4 k
15.
4>
py
MOT TO Sc.04Z
Is
CONSTRVC'nON - XLY 1, 1994
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUC'noN - F ESpUApy, 1995
PAN
T-RE Aw RAr
— — — — — — — — — —
- — -- — — — — — — -- — — —
1*
-1—
-
7 -
YaMMYu
CAR "CCOMAL (TYP)
im
' y H� ' »
POP, z
Q�
'zi -x WAL-VART PrXN SwCM To E
RMA=
WTk4 WW Wk
Pot ck SIGN
CAR "CCOMAL (TYP)
Rues
X 1\ I
-R, 4 k
15.
F
EM
I
I p0mal
0
P.
6]4 .
�7
WAL*MART
0 STORY)
137,869 So, F7
WITH EXPANSION
SElm
ME COR SE 1/4
*w T/A. sr Z9
rNMe }p
14
To ar 'c'oc.A'7w-/ k
lk 1 0 SE
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: April 26,2001
DATE PREPARED: A • 116
)2 116,20
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-0 1 -0 1 /Ankoviak CASE MANAGER: Travis Crane/
ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a 10' side yard setback variance from the 15' side yard setback
requirement in an R -1 zone, reducing the setback to 5' for the purpose of expanding
an attached garage.
12.141 W. 32 Dr.
hM 1 M13VW 1 4 "t HKIIAW
Shayne Ankoviak
12141 W. 32 Dr.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Same as Above
APPROXIMATE AREA: 15,148 ft.
PRESENT ZONING: R-1, Residential-One
PRESENT LAND USE: Single - Family Residential
SURROUNDING ZONING: N:, 1,.E:, & W. Residential-One
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met,
therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST
The property in question is located at 12141 W. 32 d Drive and is currently being used for single family
residential. The property is zoned R-1, Residential-One. (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map).
The applicant (owner) is requesting approval • a 10'side yard setback variance from the 15'side y
setback requirement in an R-I zone, reducing the setback to 5'. (Exhibit 2, Application and Exhibit
Deed). The purpose of the variance request is to allow for an expansion of the existing garage. I
11. SITE PLAN
il IF 11 1 ill 1 11 1 1 � i 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I I l�lii�l i � i 1 11 1 1 i I iiiii
The applicant has also submitted a letter outlining the reasons for the requested variance (Exhibit 5,
Applicant Letter). This variance case was originally scheduled for the February meeting, bu the applicant
withdrew the application due to insufficient information.
Staff has received no objection to or public comment regarding this variance request thus far.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
ffEffvrg�lM
If the request is denied, the property may yield a reasonable return in service and income. The
property is currently used as a single family residence and this use may continue on the property.
The property currently has an existing garage that could • utilized for storage.
Board of Adjustment Page 2
WA-0 1 -0 Cl Ankoviak
2. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property?
Board of Adjustment Page 3
WA-0 1 -0! / Ankoviak
6. If criteria a through e are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a M
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an
individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result'in
reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? I
Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria do not support the
variance request. Staff has found that there are no unique circumstances attributed to this request
that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL for the following
Board of Adjustment Page 4
WA -01 -0 1 Ankoviak
I
•
•
•
I
•
z
0=)
u
ru Z
ol
Eun)
Q:
w
LL
It LL
10 ul
I:r
—4 Z
0
LL
ui
•
•
rr i
z
•
u
z uj
0 cc
0-
u Al
X Cu
cc
a]
M ID
0
c M
CL
tt 0
LL
w
cr
Lu
w
cc
L o
•
cr - 0
ti
cr ld
M
G
LL
w
iww
I
>1
�4
0
0
CIO
v) E
8
(D
0.0
0
E
E
z
>4
E-�
OE cs
rts 0
79 .;
o H
6
z I s 0) c
M ID
0
c M
CL
tt 0
LL
w
cr
Lu
w
cc
L o
•
cr - 0
ti
cr ld
M
G
LL
w
iww
I
>1
�4
v) E
8
z
>4
79 .;
z I s 0) c
0
r 1 ,
,
0
0 1
>
E
0
>1
co z 9
ui
LU
0
z
0
o %
. -
C,
z
o C
o w S 0
w
O�
44 >
44 2
Za 44 -8 CT aw
N r4
A.; S
- 6
X
>1
CL
0
c
NX
W
(D
z
0
C 0 0
c
:D r4 0
U) rg 0
0)
, r
t) 0
x u
ui
ui
0
2 Z
0 44
0 0
cl
U 0
0)
W
z
z H
(D
0 o t:
0
3: "6
M ID
0
c M
CL
tt 0
LL
w
cr
Lu
w
cc
L o
•
cr - 0
ti
cr ld
M
G
LL
w
iww
I
0 U-
LL 0
0
LU z
1
o C4
E 4
2
1; 6
c
c
0
>1
�4
v) E
8
0 U-
LL 0
0
LU z
1
o C4
E 4
2
1; 6
c
c
0
ri
Q'IT kTPUNTAIP1, (DI K IR
LkTr
m
xt
meol Ji5t From e"jOe\
cone to pwope 4'e
JV
ROT 1] 0
OL
4x"
,)f4
wr
mZ,6u
Re. Variance in zoning for 12141 W 32r' Drive
I
���� �
._.__ __ � m_ . _. �. �- � �
..__
._
_.
�_ ._�_ ...__ �v __.W__�_�_�.�.��.___..�;w��.�.. _n�� -_�__ ��..�__._
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-01-04/Staro CASE MANAGER: Mary Austin
ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a 22' front yard setback variance from the 30' front yard setback
requirement and a 1' side yard setback variance from the 15' combined side yard
setback in an R-2 zone, for the purpose of constructing a detached garage,
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 6295 West 42 Avenue
DATE POSTED:
April 12, 2001
DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: April 12, 20-
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met,
therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case,
ONNERalffl=
The property in question is located at 6295 W. 42 Ave. and is currently being used for single family
residential. The property is zoned R-2, Residential-Two. (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map).
11. SITE PLAN
The applicant has also submitted a letter to the Board of Adjustment outlining the reasons for the requested
variance (Exhibit 5, Applicant Letter).
11 1 11 11.1il 11 !1 1 il 1 01111
Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
R ermitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located?
If the request is denied, the property may yield a reasonable return in service and income. The
property is currently used as a single family residence and this use may continue on the property
regardless of the outcome of the variance request.
Board of Adjustment Page 2
2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific
property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried
out?
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property?
The applicant, who has sole interest in the property has created a self-imposed hardship throug
the desire to construct a detached garage to accommodate additional vehicles, a boat and a trail
The required setbacks • 30' in the front yard and 15' combined side yard were in effect when tl
home was purchased by the applicant in 1991.
Board of Adjustment Page 3
WA-0 1 -04 / Stano
Board of Adjustment Page 4
WA -01 -04 1 Stano
I�
c
l
I
Owner Tf s. bebgn r ress � - ?
_9 5 VV. qZJ- 4
Phone -3034ZS'�17�"
Required information:
-6essor6 Pat - cel
Number: 13 7MC� Size of Lot �acm, or - auare footaa
Current Zoning, aL' Proposed Zoning;
Current uue. es ��W - Proposed use:
Nly cornm�ssion expires
--------- ---------- -
Date received 31-AWN Fee $�� Receipt No,COII Case No.
Comp Plan Desig Zoning Quarter Section Nlap
Related Case INo. ALMARLk - Case Manager -j��,4:
Recorded at o'clock
Recitation N;
WARRANTY DEED
0
O
Or
�=N
THIS DEED, Made this 24TII day or April, 1991 between
ANN R. DOYLE
whose legal address is 6295 WEST 42ND AVENUE,
WIIEATRIDGE,, CO 80033
or the County of JEFFERSON and State of Co, grantee:
of the County of JEFFERSON and State of CO, grantor, and
DEBRA A. S'T'AND AND TTIONIAS S. STAND
also known try street and number as 6295 WEST 42ND AVENUE, wlirA`FRIDGE_ CO 80033
I
TOGETHER with all and singular the herediraments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, o in anyw
appertaining and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thercor, and all
the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand wKilsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, i and
to the above bargained premises, with the hereditiments a appurtenances.
To HAVE AND 'TO 1101,I) the said promise,, above bargiined and described, with the appurtenances, unto
ifur grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the giatnor, for himself, his heirs and personal representatives,
does covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the grantee, his heirs and assigns, that at fil ti of the
ensealing and delivery of these presents, he is well seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure,
Pcrfcvt, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full powe an d
lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are
free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and
restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever , except for taxes for the current year, a lion but not yet due or
payable, easements, restrictions, reservations, covenants and rights-of-way of record, it any,
The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFIIND the above - bargained premi i the quiet
and peaceable possession of the grantee, his heirs arld assigns, against 311 and every person or persons l
cLuming the Whole or any part thereof.
The singular number shall include the plural, the plural (tie singular, and the use of any gender shall be
applicable to all genders,
IN WITNFSS WHEREOF the grantor his executed this decd on the d set forth above.
z
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before nic this 241'11 day of April, 1991 by ANN R. DOVILE .
Witness my hand and official seal,
MY Commission expires:
I
6
R ECEPTION NO. 91035007
4/26/91 11:25 12-25
RECORDED IN
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON
STATE OF C0I,ORADO
I
N--%32A-R-7•4. WARRANTY71M
A G f„}'
}e .T�{"♦4+�y �.",(4 Iy y� [ {gyp;^'., V C
LDr 15
I �;z+ Sc
�y -T... , w n
10
C"
C. a
F
R
A Lo
w
x
to
d
Planning and Development Department
7500 West 291h Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
RE: Land Use Case Processing Application
Tom and Debra Stano
6295 W. 42 d Avenue
Variance req'uest for 6295 W. 42 d Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO
Tom and Debra Stano are requesting this Variance because of the following
reasons and hardships:
First and foremost we have sustained major damages to our vehicles and
property in front • our home on numerous occasions. Specifically other
vehicles hitting our vehicles and other vehicles diving on our property when
making the turn around the curve.
In the immediate area of our home in the last two years variances have been
granted to other homeowners with less than ten feet set back from property
line/street. So with that in mind we hope you will consider our request for a
variance.
The garage we plan to build will complement our home.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
L&
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: April 26,2001
DATE PREPARED: April 19,2001
CASE O. & NAME: WA-01-05/Mintken CASE MANAGER: Mary Austin
ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a 12' side yard setback variance from the 30' side yard setback
requirement when abutting a public street in an R- I zone, for the purpose of
constructing a garage addition.
U21JRLLJfJQDJJWfflt1UEST: 3071 Union Street
PRESENT ZONING:
R-1, Residential-One
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met,
therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
The applicant (owner) is requesting approval of a 12 side yard setback variance from the 30' side yard
setback requirement when abutting a public street in the Residential-One zoning district. (Exhibit 2,
u• +t M "11—n— • the variance re • est to allow for h constructin of a
1QQL o
"&M
'i •
IL SITE PLAN
The applicant has also submitted a letter to the Board of Adjustment outlining the reasons for the requested
variance (Exhibit 6, Applicant Letter).
Staff has received 3 letters of support from surrounding property owners regarding this variance request thus
far. (Exhibits 7, 8 & 9)
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or t # # hical condition of
property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried
4. Has the alleged difficulty or # # been # by any person presently
interest in the property?
6. If criteria a through e are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an
individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a
reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
The construction of the garage addition and the relocation of the driveway is sought to correct a
potentially unsafe condition which could be beneficial to the neighborhood. The surrounding
neighbors have expressed their support in writing for relocating the driveway and garage. Approval
of this request would not result in the reasonable accommodation of a handicapped person.
Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the
variance request. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that
would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the
following reasons:
1. The concrete driveway onto W 31" Place shall be removed within 90 days of obtairling a
certificate of occupancy for the new garage addition.
Board of Adjustment Page 4
WA-0 1 -05 / Mintken
' N
r
/
^L
,
/
/
/ �, r
/
REWnOl 10. F0835319
3130/1999 12:46:37 PG: 001-001
PAGE FEE: 6.00 DOC.FEE*. 24.25
RECORDED XX JEFFERSON COUNTY COLORADO
filed for record the day of_.A.D. 19 at RECORDERI
Reception No. By DEP(iTY.
WARRANTY DEM
Stat=e DoctlMcn Foo
THIS DEED, made on this day of Af m a 1999 Date
--
between BLUZE MOPERTM LLC
The Grantor(s> %hail and Will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the Above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable
4
Lkmiihi
The foregoing instrument was acknowtedgetf before me on this day of hiafch 29 1999
by MICHAEL L. POIND N1 GER FOR SLIME PIZOI£RTIZS LLC
my commission expires
Witness my hand and offitiat seat.
Escrow# 8637159
Title* K637159
y created Legal p"='-tpt Ion ( 38-37
When Pecpr#ad Return to.*
Form NO. 921A Rev 4,94.
MOW
�8
gm
ins
Z
Lu
LU
z
Z
�8
gm
ins
=71AX
4
w
..r
ui
ZUT
C)G!
Q
t
=71AX
gEmmilm
NO M W11001211
ffllgg.M 0 M 0 * 0.0
Subject Vadance Request for 3071 Union Sbvmet ftat yard setback
--:'116
* Page 4 March 27 2001
Please review the enclosed materials:
Sincerely,
We hope that you approve their r' ! for • variance
4. T.M.
# •
. •�� +� :i
!i
f ! , �� ,,�� ,� �,J� - °cam-- L..�...�,
t •. �
• •
M1M �
March 28, 2001
W"Zro P - m en-Prep artm en t
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215
SUBJECT. VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 3071 UNION STREET
To Whom It May Concern:
Paul Mintken at 3071 Union Street has approached us explaining his desire to request a
variance in order to build a garage addition. He explained that he would need a 12-foot
variance into the existing 30-foot setback. Having seen the plans, we support their decision
to seek a variance in the code. The addition would not affect our property in an adverse way,
and the additions would improve property values.
Please grant them their request for a variance.
3061 UNION STREET
WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215
Lakewood Zoning Ordinances for R -1
ITEM
STANDARDS FOR 1 -R
SETBACK
front
For a habitable structure:
(Alt front setbacks are
5' from local streets:
mea from the back
35' from collector streets;
of curb. If a curb does
45' from arterial streets,
not exist, add three (3)
Garages must be set back a minimum of eighteen (18) feet
feet to the setback value
from the back of a detached sidewalk, or twenty-three ()
listed to the right and
feet from the back of an attached sidewalk, or twenty -nine
measure the setback
(29) feet from the edge of the asphalt when no sidewalk is
from the edge of the
existing. All other accessory buildings must be behind the
asphalt,
front edge of the principal structure.
A front setback also
applies to other streets
on the side or rear of a
lot.)
side
(Measured from the
15': dwelling unit, riding ring, corral, or other buildings for
the keeping of livestock or animals
property line.)
5': other detached accessory buildings or structures
rear
(Measured from the
15': dwelling unit, riding ring, corral, or other buildings for
the keeping of livestock or animals
property line.)
5': other detached accessory buildings or structures
FENCES'
front, primary
Type offence: open
Maximum height:. 42"
Minimum Setback: property line
Side, rear,. non-
Type of fence: open, Solid
primary front
Maximum height: 72"
Minimum Setback: property line
'Other requirements or performance lqq M • t
FebnWy 29, 10" 6-20
EXHIBIT 10 I-R
CITY OF T RIDGE k O A ADJUSTMENT
Minutes of Meeting
October r 11t
ORDER: 1. CALL THE MEETING TO + to order by
HOWARD pm. on October 1 in the Council « of
Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
Members Present:
The following is the official set of Board of Adjustment minutes for the Public Hearing of
October ?a, 2000. A set of these minutes is retained bath in the office of the City Merk and in
the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Wheat Ridge.
3. PUBLIC FORUM
There was no one signed up to speak.
Board of Adjustment Page 1
10/26/00
Board Member ABBOTT inquired as to whether a variance runs with the property or with
the present ownership, Alan White commented that the city has no way of knowing when
property ownership changes. He will request the city attorney to give an opinion on
whether or not a variance runs with the property or the ownership.
Upon a motion by Board Member BROWN and second by Board Member
ECHELMEYER, the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-00-09 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the required fifteen days by law, and in
. recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public
welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the
regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-
00-09 be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
Type of Variance: A 27 percent landscape variance to the landscape area
requirement of 80 percent living material, reducing the living materials to 53
percent of the total landscaped area.
Board of Adjustment Page 2
10/1-6/00
Board Member BROWN commented that there are many temporary buildings located at
various schools throughout the city.
Board Member ECHELMEYER asked if a city building inspection would have to take
place before the building is occupied, Alan White explained that the building inspections
in matters such as this are performed by the State of Colorado.
In response to a question from Board Member BROWN. Ms. Austin informed her that
the building is presently occupied by students.
Mary Austin commented that the staff would have no objection to extending the permit to
June for the sake of student safety.
Board of Adjustment Page 4
10/26/00
Mr. White explained that the temporary use could only be granted for up to one year.
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member
HOVLAND!, the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer, and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No: TUP -00-04 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the required fifteen days by law, and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public
welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the
regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Type of Temporary Building for t classroom trailer to
accommodate students during construction of a new school addition.
Board of Adjustment Page 5
1 0/26/00
For the Following Reasons:
2. 1 The temporary classroom trailer is located in an interior corner of the
property. There should be no impact on the amount of light and to
adjacent properties since the structure meets required setbacks for
temporary buildings. It would appear that the temporary building and
location meets Uniform Fire Code standards.
3. The structure is buffered on the east by carport structures that serve the
adjacent multi-family development. It is screened on the north side by trees
along the northern property line.
With the Following Conditions:
3. Any appurtenances related to the temporary structure, such as electrical
poles, shall be removed at the time the structure is removed.
In response to a question from Board Member ECHELMEYER, Ms. Austin explained
that the trees referred to on the northern property line are not yet in place, They will be in
place at the time the school addition is completed. There is shrubbery and other
vegetation in place at this time.
Board Member ECHELMEYER expressed concern about an existing power line located
from the southeast comer of the main building to the temporary building. Mr. Fulton
explained that this is a temporary telephone line that will be removed at the time the
temporary building is removed.
Board of Adjustment Page 6
10/26/00
Chair HOWARD advised the applicant that the application for a temporary building
permit was approved.
5. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
Chair HOWARD declared the public hearing closed.
6. OLD BUSINESS '
There was no old business to come before the BoA
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Approval.of Minutes - It was moved by Board Member ABBOTT and
seconded by Board Member ECHELMEYER to approve the minutes of the
September 27, 2000 meeting as presented. The motion passed 5-0 with Board
Members MAURO and MONTOYA absent and Board Member HOVLAND
abstaining.
There was a consensus of the Board to hold election of officers at the January. 2001
meeting.
Board of Adjustment Page 7
10/26/00