HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/03/2001The following is the official set of Planning Commission minutes for the public hearing of April 5,
2001. A set of these minutes is retained both in the office of the City Clerk and in the Department of
Planning and Development of the City of Wheat Ridge.
Planning Commission Page I
April 5, 001
5. APPROVE MINUTES
It was moved by Commissioner COLLI NS and seconded by Commissioner THOMPSON
to approve the minutes of March 1, 2001 as presented. The motion passed 4-0 with
Commissioners GOKEY, MILLER and WEISZ abstaining.
11. PUBLIC FORUM M
There was no one to appear before the Commissil
A. Case No. CUP-01-01: Application by Foothills Academy for approval of a Conditional
Use Permit to allow expansion of a private school on property zoned Agricultural-One and
Residential-Two (A) and located at 4725 Miller Street.
Prior to her presentation, Meredith Reckert distributed copies of a letter received April 5. 2001,
from Karen Heine expressing concern about traffic in the school area. This letter was made a
part of the case file.
Ms. Reckert reviewed the staff report and presented slides and overheads of the application.
All pertinent documents were entered into the record and accepted by Chair McNamee. Staff
recommended approval of the application with conditions as outlined in the staff report.
Commissioner THOMPSON commented that she observed school traffic during student pick-
up time. She expressed concern about unsafe practices such as making u-turns in the middle of
the street and parked cars on 47 and Miller that obstruct sight triangles. She inquired as to
whether traffic counts had been done on these streets that are designated as Class 6. Steve
Nguyen informed that traffic counts are within the range for Class 6 streets.
Planning Commission Page 2
April 5, 2001
110 10
i "Smirtgal almalm I gm I a I fam gggm I a I I
Commissioner THOMPSON asked if consideration had been given to shared parking with the
Montessori School. Ms. Faddick replied they have been working with Montessori on shared
facilities and traffic mitigation and that there would probably be cooperation for shared parking,
also. She also commented that the families involved with Foothills Academy are pleased with
this plan, especially as it relates to traffic mitigation.
In response to a question from Commissioner GOKEY. Mr. Dierschow stated that he has
discussed his concerns with representatives of the school and found them to be very
cooperative. He did believe, however, that they did not have a true understanding of the traffic
impact on the neighborhood. He was in favor of eliminating parking on Miller Street.
Chair McNAMEE referred to the speeding problem on Miller and asked if it would be possible
to install flashing school signals on Miller. Steve Nguyen replied that there are school zone
Planning Commission Page 3
April 5. 001
In response to a question from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Nguyen replied that a traffic island
on Miller would be feasible. Commissioner COOPER commented that the island would
11111110=51=
Commissioner COOPER asked about the neighborhood traffic management plan (NTMP)
process. Mr. Nguyen explained that the process is started with a petition that must be signed by
75% of property owners. Petitions have been sent out to this neighborhood, but have not been
returned. He was in favor of waiting until the 300-foot pick-up lane is installed to restrict
parking or install traffic -cal mi jig devices.
Chair McNAMEE asked if there were others present who wished to address the Commission.
Hearing no response, she closed the public hearing.
(Chair McNAMEE declared a recess at 8:45 p.m. The meeting was resumed at 9:00 p.m.)
It was moved by Commissioner THOMPSON and seconded by Commissioner GOKEY to
approve Case No. CUP-00-01, a request for a conditional use permit to allow expansion of
a private school in an A-1 and R-2A zone located at 4725 Miller Street for the following
Commissioner COOPER offered an amendment to add condition no. 10 which would
require redesign of the plan to add additional parking spaces for the school vans. The
amendment was accepted by Commissioners THOMPSON and GOKEY.
Commissioner GOKEY offered an amendment to add condition no. 11 which would
require vertical landscape buffering between the school property and adjacent houses.
The amendment was accepted by Commissioner THOMPSON.
Planning Commission Page 5
April 5, 2001
The motion passed unanimously.
B. Case No. ZOA-01-01: An ordinance amending Article 11 of Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws concerning the addition of a Conservation Zoning District.
Chair McNAMEE asked if there were any individuals present who wished to address this
ordinance. Hearing no response, she closed the public hearing.
Commissioner COLLINS commented that the proposed ordinance, even though there are some
flaws, is better than R- ) zoning for the greenbelt.
In response to a question from Commissioner THOM PSON, Mr. Dahl replied that property
owners have options of placing conservation easements on their property: leaving the property
unimproved regardless of zoning or requesting a conservation district zone.
Commissioner THOMPSON expressed concern about control of noxious weeds in conservation
areas. Mr. Dahl will check to see if this is covered in the weed ordinance.
Commissioner GOKEY suggested that the word "pristine" be used to describe property that can
be zoned as conservation district. He expressed concern that once a property is zoned as
conservation, it would be difficult to have it rezoned for any other reason. Mr. Dahl explained
that this zoning is no different than any other where a property owner can request a rezone.
Commissioner GOKEY also expressed concern about a possible mass rezone to conservation
district. Mr. Dahl commented that a city cannot downzone to leave a property with no
economic benefit. He also advised that the ordinance could contain wording that property can
only be changed to conservation at the owner's initiation.
Chair McNAMEE expressed concern about the possibility that benches, trails, etc., would not
be allowed in the greenbelt under this ordinance. Commissioner THOMPSON stated that she
Planning Commission Page 6
April 5, 2001
did not believe the greenbelt and Dena Gulch would fall under the intent of this ordinance and
suggested that the greenbelt could be designated as a combination of conservation area and
park.
Commissioner COOPER expressed concern about sprat zoning conservation areas
Discussion points included:
_ _
Planning Commission e
April 5, 001 a 7
• Consideration could be given to enforcing changes when the property changes hands.
Do
W
IN
The Commission reached a consensus to support option no, 5 in the memorandum that is to stay
the course. The city would continue to require owners to prove the second unit was lawfully
established. If no proof was provided, the unit would need to be removed or the structure
altered so that it was not a separate unit. However, situations should be considered on a case by
B. Comnrehensive Plan - Commissioner THOMPSON suggested that the color
designated on the Comprehensive Plan for Foothills Academy is in error and should be
changed. This should be changed from red (Community Commercial Center) to yellow
(single family - not to exceed 6 du's/acre) to match surrounding properties.
Meredith Reckert suggested that this change be considered during the annual review of the
Comprehensive Plan.
COMMISSION REPORTS
There were no commission reports.
COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS
There were no committee or department reports.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner G►KEY and seconded by Commissioner COLLINS to
adjourn the meeting at 10:20 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
MARIAN McNAMEE, Chair
Planning Commission
April 5, 2001
Ann l,azzeri, Recording Secretary
Em
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of ten lot subdivision with a variance
LOCATION OF QUEST: 9737 West 32" Avenue
! 1 MI
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been
met. Therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
PC Staff Report Page l
May 3, 2001
The applicant requests approval of a preliminary and final subdivision plat for property located at 9737 West
32' Avenue. This application also includes a request for approval of a variance to the maximum cul-de-sac
length specified in the Subdivision Regulations. Pursuant to Section 4-13-5 of the Subdivision Regulations,
"cul-de-sac centerpoints shall not be, longer than 500' from the centerline, intersection of streets serving the
subdivision". The cul-de-sac proposed is 622.91' long from the centerline of West 32' Avenue.
11111111 IIIIIIIIIIv iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillilli�illillillillillillillilillillilliI III 111 11
Z0=MM=U1
11111111111pillylgill Ilp I 1 111111pIllill,111111
with the following additional information to be provided by the applicant.
See attached Exhibit 'A' which are minutes from the November 2, 2000, public hearing,
Planning Commission has requested that land use cases not be published for public hearing until all outstanding
items have been resolved, In this case. while there are minor issues with the plat document, tile drainage report
and other civil drawings need substantial modification. This case was set and published for Planning
Commission public hearing at the direction of the acting City Manager.
The applicant has requested that certain correspondence be included in the packet. This correspondence has
been included as Exhibits *13% 'C' and 'D,
The property is currently zoned R- 1, Residential-One, is comprised of two parcels and has an existing house
located on the southern portion of the western lot, The remainder of the property is vacant. The property has a
substantial grade change with over a 45drop from the southern boundary (adjacent to West 32"' Avenue) to the
northern limits. At the steepest point (roughly midway), the grade is 7%, The Rocky Mountain Ditch defines the
northern boundary of the property.
The applicant has submitted both a preliminary plat and a final plat which show a ten-lot, single family
residential design accessing West 32 Avenue via,a cul-de-sac bulb, The plats contained in this packet are
substantially the same documents reviewed by Planning Commission on November 2, 2000, However, since the
past review by Planning Commission, the storm water drainage system has been redesigned to run along the
north subdivision boundary, cross under the Rocky Mountain ditch and proceed through a residential property
PC Staff Report Page 2
May 3. 2001
IV. AGENCY REFERRALS
The Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District has requested a 50' radius for the cul-de-sac bulb if on-street parking is
desired. This has been incorporated into the final plat.
The Westridge Sanitation district approved a request by the developer to extend a sewer main over to
Independence as there is no sanitary sewer in West 32' Avenue. The developer negotiated with the property
owner of 3395 Independence Street to purchase an easement across his property for extension of the main along
the south side of the existing home, This sewer line has already been installed,
Consolidated Mutual Water District can serve the property with a mainline extension from West ,32 "d Avenue.
Public Service Company has requested specific easement language be added tothe final pla Thishasbeen
�ncorporated onto sheet I as a note,
PC Staff Report Page 3
May 3, 2001
IV. VARIANCE
The applicant is requesting a 122.9 F variance to the 500 maximum cul-de-sac provision in the subdivisil
regulations. This standard is in place primarily
• address emergency access issues and to encourage an
integrated public street system instead of a series of unconnected cul-de-sac bulbs throughout the city.
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request. (The criteria used
are from the old code since this application was submitted when it was in effect.)
I. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be
used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located?
The property can still be used if the variance is not granted. However, the resulting subdivision may have an
inefficient design and would probably require the use of flag lots which are discouraged.
2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances?
3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
Granting of the variance would not alter the character of the area, Cul-de-sacs serving adjacent subdivisions
both exceed 500' in length. To the west. Jellison Street was dedicated in 1970 as part of the Wheat Ridge Knolls
Subdivision and is 712' in length. Independence Street within Davo Subdivision was platted in 1952 and is 92-
in length. The 5170' cul -de -sac restriction has been in the subdivision regulations since original adoption in 1972.
An alternate design could have been to make a connection to either Jellison or Independence Street. Although
there are no vacant lots to either the east or west, the applicant could have purchased a homesite and demolished
the house to make room for the connection. Staff believes that this scenario would have had a negative impact
on the residents adjacent to the street intersection.
4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific
property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere
inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out?
The property has unique physical attributes in regards to length of the property (over 700') and the slope (about
7%).
PC Staff Report Page 4
May 3, 2001
5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to
'the other property within the same zoning classification?
6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property?
Lengthening the cul-de-sac maximizes the number of developable lots within the development. Fewer lots could
be created without the variance,
PC Staff Report Page 5
May 3, 2001
Staff has concluded that while the requirements specified in the subdivision regulations have been met for the
preliminary and final plat documents, the supporting technical information and documents requested by the city
Public Works and Building Departments have not been finalized and reviewed. Because of the severe slope of
the property, staff has concluded this additional information is crucial not only for the welfare of potential
buyers but for adjacent property owners as well.
Planning Commission has three options with this request: 1) approve the request with a list of conditions, 2)
continue the hearing and request the additional information, or 3) deny the request. Recommended motions
have been provided for each option. The three options have been listed alphabetically and are not meant to
constitute a preterence staff.
VIL RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
•
Option B: "I move that the request for approval of a 122.91' cul-de-sac length variance on Residential-One zoned
property located at 9737 West 32 Avenue be CONTINUED to
Option C. I move that the request for approval of a 122.91` cul-de-sac length variance on Residential-One zoned
property located at 9737 West 32` Avenue be DENIED for the following reasons:
The hardship is self-imposed.
The property may still be developed if the variance isn't granted.
The granting of the variance would not result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood,
nor would it result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities."
latims
Option A I move that the request for approval of a ten-lot preliminary subdivision plat for Residential-One
zoned property located at 9737 West 32' Avenue be recommended for APPROVAL for the following reasons
All minimum requirements of the R-I zone district standards have been met.
3.
PC Staff Report Page 6
May 3.2 01
An easement be provided across Lot 7 for the sanitary sewer."
zoned property located at 9737 West 32' Avenue he CONTINUED t
Option C: "I move that the request for approval • a ten-lot preliminary subdivision plat for Residential-One
zoned property located at 9737 West 32' Avenue be DENIED for the following reasons:
2.
FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT
PC Staff Report Page 7
May 3, 2001
Option B: "I move that the request for approval of a ten-lot final subdivision plat for Residential-One zoned
property located at 9737 West 32" Avenue be CONTINUED until
Option C: "I move that the request for approval of a ten-lot final subdivision plat for Residential-One zoned
property located at 9737 West 32' Avenue be DENIED for the following reasons:
e.\planning\forms\report
PC Staff Report. Page 8
May 3, 2001
w 38T4 Ave
I� HA 1�
t.
:? it _1
CEPARTMEN OF } S #w - 235-202
11
21
��, .
H "Th A
3
AV=
f � ..
"` r .
µ
'
+�.�...•°�:{
E
'� .-..*
n
3288
Cy
n
ff p
vohns
dG
n
3722
........ 1ww .r..."°- µ by .,»r..• ... .....
.,... .:"'"':. ?".?`. <_....
-...:: ...
-:;
M�
2
-ZONE
OISTRICT ecl-Nop-Y
"'° CITY !.lMiT Uhl
o �n be aaa aoe
COLORADO _ wA77ER PEATURE
L
1
MAP AOOPT�. Juno 1 5. !'4q4
y. @9t 3S.tvi, cm: J4nucry ' I 0)45
CEPARTMEN OF } S #w - 235-202
Ted Carl
4725 Independence St.
Mr. Carl was sworn in by Chair MacDOUGALL. Mr, Carl is general manager of a firm which
is located adjacent to the subject property. He spoke in favor of the application and felt it
would be an improvement to the neighborhood.
It was moved by Commissioner DOYLE and seconded by Commissioner COLLINS that
Case No. MS-00-06, a request for a two-lot minor subdivision for property located at 47-
Independence Street be APPROVED for the following reasons: I
1. The requirements of the City"s Subdivision Regulations have been met.,
2 The existing structure on lot I meets the lot coverage and setback requirements of
the Industrial zoning district.
Commissioner SNOW offered an amendment to add the following condition:
7n was aec'c7mw' 6 7r-olumisslonelF3;Jltf - a - Me motion
passed unanimously.
Commissioner THOMPSON referred to the preliminary plat that outlines the garage but does
not indicate the garage should be removed. Ms. Reckert stated this would be noted on the plat.
Em
In response to a question from Commissioner SNOW. Ms. Reckert stated that a homeowners
association would be required to maintain landscaping along 32nd Avenue right-of-waN%
detention pond and the access easement to the detention pond. I
Garcia explained that it would contain a I 00-year-storm and release at historic flows.
Negotiations are in process between the developer and the Rocky Mountain Ditch Compan
regarding release
• storm water into the ditch. I
Planning Commission Page 4
November 2, 2000
would provide better access to the Rocky Mountain Ditch which could be a public liability if it
is not readily accessible to emergency equipment.
in concialsion, • - rrrel
subdivision regulations for preliminary and final plat documents and would build a quality
subdivision that Wheat Ridge would �e proud of
Commissioner SNOW commented that the city staff's function is to provide information to the
Commission to aid in the decision making process and advised Mr. Schneider that it is not
helpful to spend
• much time attacking the staff.
Dennis Bearnis
6998 Robb Street, Arvada
In answer to a question from Commissioner COLLINS as to how the water would flow to the
retention ditch. Mr. Beamis stated there would be a piping system as well as the use of swales
Commissioner THOMPSON asked who would be responsible for maintaining the drainage
systems. Mr. Beamis replied it would be the responsibility of the homeowners association and
that the drainage system should be cleaned when sediments become apparent.
Commissioner SNOW asked what the water depth would be in the detention pond. Mr. Bearnis
replied that it would be approximately five feet deep for a 24-48 hour period during a I 00-year
storm, A I 0-year storm would be approximately three feet deep. draining within 10- 1 2 flours.
Five year storm water would be retained in the underground detention,
Chair MacDOUGALL expressed concern that flooding of the Rocky Mountain Ditch would
cause problems for the lots on the north side of the ditch on 3 )4th Avenue. Mr, Bearnis said the
drainage design would reduce the volume of water flowing into the ditch.
Commissioner THOMPSON asked how the proposed subdivision compared with the
subdivision on Jellison in regard to topography and grading. Mr. Beamis stated they would be
Commissioner SNOW asked if building footprints have been submitted to the city. Mr. Beam
replied that these had not been requested by the city. He stated that finished floor elevations I
Planning Commission Page 5
November 2, 2000
were submitted with original plans. Plans shoring: foundation elevations were submitted
Monday prior to this meeting, There are no plans to have retaining walls for any of the houses.
In response to a question from Commissioner McNAMEE. Mr. Be is stated there is no
unstable Land in the subject area. Staff also indicated they were not aware of any unstable land.
Commissioner THOMPSON asked if fewer developed lots would mitigate the drainage issues.
Mr. Goebel replied that any reduction in impermeable surfaces would reduce the amount of
runoff.
Planning Commission Page
November 2, 2000
Gerald Dahl explained that the developer must satisfy the city's drainage requirements
regardless of an agreement with the ditch company. The question is whether or not the
Commission feels they have adequate information to make a decision. He advised that any
continuance should be a continuance of the hearing rather than just continuing it for action to
give opportunity for more testimony.
3333 Independence Street
Ms. Goldfarb was sworn in by Chair MacDOUGALL. She has lived at this address for 41
years and testified there have been many flooding problems in the area and the area of the
proposed development is wet most of the time. She expressed concern that the development
will cause more runoff into her neighborhood.
John Gammon
3305 Independence Court
Mr. Gammon was sworn in by Chair MacDOUGALL. He has lived at this address for 8 years.
He expressed concern that the development would increase drainage into his property which
already experiences many drainage problems.
Commissioner GOKEY asked Mr, Dee's opinion about the possibility of building walkout
basements or basements if the water table is high in this area. Mr. Dee replied that this would
depend upon the permeability • the soil.
IW IL-72 lumIlLmlow"lugg P A IIIIIII
Dave Oldham
3232 Jellison
Mr. Oldham was sworn in by Chair MacDOUGALL. He purchased his home three years ago
and is aware of three homes on Jellison that flood occasionally. There are three swampy areas
Planning Commission Page 7
November 2, 2000
on the adjacent property and he expressed concern about more drainage coming onto his
property. He expressed further concern about maintenance of the detention pond, He stated
that he is a homebuilder and would not build on the property without doing a lot of
subexcavation and installing proper drainage systems, He also expressed concern about the
steep slope of the street in regard to icy winter conditions.
Bob Goebel commented that the Clean Water Act requirements would not apply to cities under
100.000 until sometime around 2003 ) .
Planning Commission
Page 8
November 2, 2000
Commissioner GOKEY asked which lots would have the option of having walk-out base mients.
Mr, Bearnis replied that lot 7 would be the only walk-out. Lots 3 through 6 and 8 through 10
could possibly be garden level.
In response to a question from Commissioner'SNOW, Alan White explained that the length of
the cul-de-sac affects the design of the subdivision. It would be an option for the Commission
to take action on the variance at this meeting. Meredith Reckert commented that the drainage
plan would have to be revised again if the request,for variance is denied.
Commissioner COLLINS stated that he would not support the motion because there is not
enough information at this time in regard to drainage issues.
The motion failed bv a vote of 5 to 3 with Commissioners COLLINS, COOPER and
DOVLE voting opposed. (A motion to approve a variance would require a super-'
majority of 6 affirmative votes.)
Commissioner COOPER indicated that she voted against the motion for the same reason stated
by Commissioner COLLINS,
F"
, -ommissioner SNOW suggested that it might be appropriate to reconsider the motion
regarding the variance because she should have made a motion to continue.
Commissioner COOPER moved and Commissioner GOKEY seconded to reconsider the
motion on the variance. The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner THOMPSON seconded that the reques
for approval of a 123-foot cul-de-sac variance on R-I zoned property located at 9737 We
32nd Avenue be continued to a date uncertain. The motion passed unanimously.
Planning Commission Page 9
November 2. 2000
Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner THOMPSON seconded that request for
approval of a ten-lot preliminary subdivision plat for Residential-One zoned property
located at 9737 West 32nd Avenue be continued to a date uncertain with the followin'-
additional information to be provided by the applicant: It"
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Chair MacDOUGALL declared the public hearing closed.
Planning Commission Page 10
November 2. 2000
9. OLIFBUSINESS
There was no old business to come before the Commissiol
A. Meeting Schedules for Lkemainder of the Year - There was a consensus of the
Commission to hold a study session in addition to the regular meeting on November 16.
The purpose of the study session will be to discuss the recently updated zoning code.
11. COMMISSION REPORTS
There were no'Commissionreports.
12. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS
There were no* committee
• department repofts.
13. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner McNAMEE to
adjourn the meeting at 11:26 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
i I I
1�
WM
Re., Planning Commission Meeting
Dear Alan:
In the morning of April 3, 2001, 1 had a conversation with Acting City Manager Jack
Hurst where I explained my conversation + Reckert. After discussing
issue, Mr. Hurst guaranteed that the review of the pp gat Preserve Subdivision
would occur at the April • 2001 Planning should be
• Mr. Hurst then hung up the phone.
Cc: Tim Buchanan
Cc: Jack Hurst
Cc: Meredith Reckert
7500 "Vest 29th Avenw
W• i
The City A
Wheat RiA
Sincerely,
Meredith Reckert, AICP
Senior Planner
c: Mike Garcia
WS-00-01
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE # WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215
Mr, David Schneider
Applewood Building Company, Inc.
3331 Oak Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Please be aware that the April 5" date gives staff only one week to review the information. If the
information is submitted any time after April 5", we will recommend that Planning Commission
continue the hearing on your application.
I'm sure you understand that going back to Planning Commission without the information or
I
without staff review would be viewed negatively by the Commission. Please contact nie if you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
Alan C. White, AICP
cc: Jack Hurst, Acting City Manager
Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner
Mike Garcia, Development Review Enginel
k 1111 111111111IT111121FIN " 1 07111 jg�;Iql
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, • .r• :i
elehone 343/ 235 -2868
AX 3431235 -2857
April 24, 2001
The City o f
Wheat
Ridge
Mr. Dennis Eeamis, P.E.
Ascent Engineering Services
12191 Ralston Road, Suite 209
Arvada, Colorado 80004
Re: Applewood Preserve, 9737 W. 32nd Street, Wheat Ridge,
Colorado 80004 - Fifth Review Comments of Final Drainage Study,
s- ,.-
1. The City is in receipt of the storm sewer easement for the
parcel between the Rocky Mountain Ditch and W. 34th Drive. This
document is under review and any subsequent comments will be
required to be completed.
2. Please include "Exhibit A" and "Exhibit B" that is referred to
in the License Agreement submitted between Rocky Mountain Ditch
Company and Applewood Building Company, Inc.
3. Since the previous submittal, a storm sewer has been added as
well as drainage designed along the Lot lines. Therefore, ALL of
the Utility Easements indicated on this plat are to be designated
as Drainage AND Utility Easements.
4. The storm sewer along the North end of Lot 7 needs to lie
within a Drainage and Utility Easement.
Mr. Dave Brossman, P.L.S., may be reached at 303-235-2864
regarding questions for these requirements or the Final Plat
comments.
3. Please show the ground water table elevation on the
"Conceptual Storm Sewer Plan" profile to determine if de-watering
is required during construction.
Please provide 2 signed and stamped sets of the drainage report
and plan with the second submittal.
Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Upon City Council approval of the Final Plat, a Subdivision
Improvement Agreement will need to be executed by the project
owner/developer.
Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit
Prior to the commencement • any ► nsite grading, an Application
for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with fees due will need to be
submitted for review and approval.
Traffic Engineering
A copy of the Iris Court construction plans has been forwarded to
the City's Traffic Engineer, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E., 303-235-2862
for review. The following are comments by the Traffic Engineer:
1. The City is in receipt of a street light plan as required. The
street light plan by Excel Energy must be reviewed and approved
by the City prior to the first building permit.
2. The corner ramp detail must show how to transition to the
existing 8 foot sidewalk.
3. Please include the vertical curb, gutter and walk detail. This
has been enclosed for your convenience.
Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing
Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the
necessary right-of-way construction permit(s) and respective
licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City.
Please return all red-lined prints with the fifth submittal.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2868.
Michael Garcia
�� •• ��
9 11-V47
C , P,c
OcLrA 4mmt 4AOtQ$ ARC
74. IS, 37. 15,00' 20, � I
'03 13
oAako o-oAo No
a 41 $4 3V 12 All't
PROSPECT RIDGE SUBDIVISION
40 1EVOW
303-233-644M 3 -133-64"
I
70*3 1 00 �s 16�
Z3 .0, 4 141-1-AIll,
17 12 1* 3-*14 IZ'v
' AND TRACTS A AND 8 OF
RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS I THROUGH —
29
I IS:
Ila* 3 . 00 06 it
/1
PROSPECT RIDGE IMINOR SUBDIVISION, BEING PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 20 AND
76
CF Sy OAXItL F SC40C 00 AMC THEM 9, SCHNUOM
Ili
TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 59 WEST OF THE 67H PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN
ICE y
♦ITINESS NY NANO AW I* c
lA*Y ftfttC
r
A
13 . .0 2 4't
Ci ty OF * RIC)rA, tEFFERION C-W"ITY CLORAOO
tt
fit kt
2. 30 OT
t s
2!62 TAFT CT.
LAKC0000 IMS LA CID, SOUS
S
40 1EVOW
303-233-644M 3 -133-64"
IEA* 140
D It AAKX
I IS:
0 ;
, I,
A2 AO
t
- I-C Foom I NSTALMOENT WAS ACyJ*;,vq.9D= IEFORIE WE TW3 DAY
76
CF Sy OAXItL F SC40C 00 AMC THEM 9, SCHNUOM
Rai MINING
Si ;5'
ICE y
♦ITINESS NY NANO AW I* c
lA*Y ftfttC
r
A
13 . .0 2 4't
30 1
LOT it I
2,32• 30.fl,
L I t.0
Adds Si
J
LAXIEVOW STATE SANK
IRS$ 10. WADS1004114 *LT, Iz TINS
3", DO'S
zo 00
A
' pp er
i2 LOT 12
v SQ, FT.!
couporY OF JEFFERSON I
rO' UTILITY
I SV
STATE OF MORADO I
Imswo VAX ACKNOMENUED WORE WET4 DAY
m
;=("! coolma
1 49 -1 � sy &Lt. E. )40*T(W AS 9XECUTtiet VICE-P R CS"
f-I.EVOW STATE SANK.
VrNkll VY ARNO
my COW $3 t ON v( No Y PUSK.
j Mt_a.
40OKS11
tt
fit kt
2. 30 OT
A3,S63 $0 FT, r oe * I . At 0
I — ,— - ?t - § zamtmo i a
N'
SCxLE 1' 60'
/4 CORNER SECTION 20
MR TN !,. coltf1t SECTION 21
POINT IXASS CO IN RAM"
SOX L3 132
1 � ♦m 4
lzr--=--
OT I
49 A3 00' S
LOT 3
�t2.534 SOFT.
LOT S O FT.
MFT.
--I �ti
ll� UTIL ITY
I SENIENt
I ryl. I CAL I
LOT 1
12. $64 SOFT.
.10" UTILITY-
LOT IS
a FT.
A
t s
2!62 TAFT CT.
LAKC0000 IMS LA CID, SOUS
S
40 1EVOW
303-233-644M 3 -133-64"
LOT
p
I IS:
0 ;
, I,
Z3
t
- I-C Foom I NSTALMOENT WAS ACyJ*;,vq.9D= IEFORIE WE TW3 DAY
UTtl-i ry POND t'
EA 5ENENT SEE
CF Sy OAXItL F SC40C 00 AMC THEM 9, SCHNUOM
Rai MINING
WNT—
ICE y
♦ITINESS NY NANO AW I* c
lA*Y ftfttC
r
A-t ZONING
J
PO
"TAINA LEEWAYIE
LOT it I
2,32• 30.fl,
L I t.0
Adds Si
J
LAXIEVOW STATE SANK
IRS$ 10. WADS1004114 *LT, Iz TINS
CIS 32 303.966-554111
A3,S63 $0 FT, r oe * I . At 0
I — ,— - ?t - § zamtmo i a
N'
SCxLE 1' 60'
/4 CORNER SECTION 20
MR TN !,. coltf1t SECTION 21
POINT IXASS CO IN RAM"
SOX L3 132
1 � ♦m 4
lzr--=--
OT I
49 A3 00' S
LOT 3
�t2.534 SOFT.
LOT S O FT.
MFT.
--I �ti
ll� UTIL ITY
I SENIENt
I ryl. I CAL I
LOT 1
12. $64 SOFT.
.10" UTILITY-
LOT IS
a FT.
A
CO: SECTION 20
CORNER SECTION 29
t /A- SmAll CAP '"
Ul" ""DINT SOX LS 14212
jw� W
V
-4dglkL
l w
pqVIAlto sy� t.409 Emai"CrAl"a lovIct I
4500 REST 14TIN &*%I"[. .."Vvwo CIS #
7t-, t 404 l 233- P" 54*36 1,13.0794
CASE HISTORY
L=x 1-4 1 a 17 " p
BOOK. —/jj_PAGE
R E C E P T I O N NO- 'E'll 3 5 - - US
j),AR*t e, so4"CtOt* Selma rl�* OvNERS
# f D f, *No S 4 ACRES
'SF -t* Aj�AL litaptlry or 5 6 DESCRIBED As ;oL43v3,
-Escsllprto*.
_ PACT, A A TN R O UON A I 0*01PIECT RIDGE Alf-0:03 OF
Y OF
+rrw'E,A,T ArOC _tFFEA,ON COUNTY COLOR AC60 SOR CA ST, WN EWtNo At r�4e SOUTf.CAST CORNER 'If
AS �% RUE "' PlIt"CtP&L ION 20
"ON NG r
,.ej;OlAW rK"CE I Of SAID SECTION O 20, A NE 0 LOT l
LINE Of SAID
S
Ow �7'00*t
ALGW SOU r�� jAST C E.; , T L INE OF SAID TRACT R. is 64 FEET
',j#kCX Of SA ID 4.7101- 4137**, -LONG
lkT A MO ,.'
30 A, 043TAma OF
Sou"4 co s.,a or
rt T3
ts SE
Q, OF 'A",
,�
i. ' , L CD*,Nt 3 0
V AL"NO WE!
of 796, 34 FEET 4 T,,,R'N NOR rww st Of LOT 3:
..0
IT, SAID LO 3 A14
;� , � 3 EALY -L004 ' WE _ LINES OF
, ,
TK FOLLowtma SEVEN C"SM
!9 .46'j4*C, A I W :.I
2. "' -TA :3
N. S : 'l' I t STANCE
4, 4 t A . OF
S D, 30 21
. 5 - A 01 . 1 T
DI OF 0 00 r, 1 1 3 1 0 1 4 3 :
14 -A 02' T t 'V A 01 srAma OF 236, w TO WE NORTKAST
1 4' 4S*S7'*9'E, A 01 EAST LINE Of CORNEA OF
LOT A AA4
, 4 MENCt I WtVOO't- AL004 THE P F EE T 70 rK
Ti4C EAST LINE 0 TAACT 4, A 01 STANa OF so It
00tot of
of,wiTrl �SCWZOU WFA
S J, , WORE
2 al X 1 o0flt
T clr
t s
2!62 TAFT CT.
LAKC0000 IMS LA CID, SOUS
S
40 1EVOW
303-233-644M 3 -133-64"
LOT
p
I IS:
Z3
t
- I-C Foom I NSTALMOENT WAS ACyJ*;,vq.9D= IEFORIE WE TW3 DAY
CF Sy OAXItL F SC40C 00 AMC THEM 9, SCHNUOM
D
At
ICE y
♦ITINESS NY NANO AW I* c
lA*Y ftfttC
r
NY Cow"twoft EXPIRES, .
J
PO
"TAINA LEEWAYIE
LOT it I
2,32• 30.fl,
wmou OF OaD or TituiT., NOYANY MJKAC
STAYS CO OCILCOA00
Adds Si
J
LAXIEVOW STATE SANK
IRS$ 10. WADS1004114 *LT, Iz TINS
CIS 32 303.966-554111
' pp er
i2 LOT 12
v SQ, FT.!
couporY OF JEFFERSON I
rO' UTILITY
CO: SECTION 20
CORNER SECTION 29
t /A- SmAll CAP '"
Ul" ""DINT SOX LS 14212
jw� W
V
-4dglkL
l w
pqVIAlto sy� t.409 Emai"CrAl"a lovIct I
4500 REST 14TIN &*%I"[. .."Vvwo CIS #
7t-, t 404 l 233- P" 54*36 1,13.0794
CASE HISTORY
L=x 1-4 1 a 17 " p
BOOK. —/jj_PAGE
R E C E P T I O N NO- 'E'll 3 5 - - US
j),AR*t e, so4"CtOt* Selma rl�* OvNERS
# f D f, *No S 4 ACRES
'SF -t* Aj�AL litaptlry or 5 6 DESCRIBED As ;oL43v3,
-Escsllprto*.
_ PACT, A A TN R O UON A I 0*01PIECT RIDGE Alf-0:03 OF
Y OF
+rrw'E,A,T ArOC _tFFEA,ON COUNTY COLOR AC60 SOR CA ST, WN EWtNo At r�4e SOUTf.CAST CORNER 'If
AS �% RUE "' PlIt"CtP&L ION 20
"ON NG r
,.ej;OlAW rK"CE I Of SAID SECTION O 20, A NE 0 LOT l
LINE Of SAID
S
Ow �7'00*t
ALGW SOU r�� jAST C E.; , T L INE OF SAID TRACT R. is 64 FEET
',j#kCX Of SA ID 4.7101- 4137**, -LONG
lkT A MO ,.'
30 A, 043TAma OF
Sou"4 co s.,a or
rt T3
ts SE
Q, OF 'A",
,�
i. ' , L CD*,Nt 3 0
V AL"NO WE!
of 796, 34 FEET 4 T,,,R'N NOR rww st Of LOT 3:
..0
IT, SAID LO 3 A14
;� , � 3 EALY -L004 ' WE _ LINES OF
, ,
TK FOLLowtma SEVEN C"SM
!9 .46'j4*C, A I W :.I
2. "' -TA :3
N. S : 'l' I t STANCE
4, 4 t A . OF
S D, 30 21
. 5 - A 01 . 1 T
DI OF 0 00 r, 1 1 3 1 0 1 4 3 :
14 -A 02' T t 'V A 01 srAma OF 236, w TO WE NORTKAST
1 4' 4S*S7'*9'E, A 01 EAST LINE Of CORNEA OF
LOT A AA4
, 4 MENCt I WtVOO't- AL004 THE P F EE T 70 rK
Ti4C EAST LINE 0 TAACT 4, A 01 STANa OF so It
00tot of
of,wiTrl �SCWZOU WFA
S J, , WORE
2 al X 1 o0flt
T clr
2!62 TAFT CT.
LAKC0000 IMS LA CID, SOUS
S
40 1EVOW
303-233-644M 3 -133-64"
COUNTY OF AFFSASON I
I IS:
Of COLORADO
- I-C Foom I NSTALMOENT WAS ACyJ*;,vq.9D= IEFORIE WE TW3 DAY
CF Sy OAXItL F SC40C 00 AMC THEM 9, SCHNUOM
ICE y
♦ITINESS NY NANO AW I* c
lA*Y ftfttC
NY Cow"twoft EXPIRES, .
"TAINA LEEWAYIE
IMI A—Ak"&L
wmou OF OaD or TituiT., NOYANY MJKAC
STAYS CO OCILCOA00
Adds Si
LAXIEVOW STATE SANK
IRS$ 10. WADS1004114 *LT, Iz TINS
CIS 32 303.966-554111
1 44.
.zm E .4 ro
E I Titit y t CE"PRiESIOIENT
couporY OF JEFFERSON I
I SV
STATE OF MORADO I
Imswo VAX ACKNOMENUED WORE WET4 DAY
m
;=("! coolma
1 49 -1 � sy &Lt. E. )40*T(W AS 9XECUTtiet VICE-P R CS"
f-I.EVOW STATE SANK.
VrNkll VY ARNO
my COW $3 t ON v( No Y PUSK.
j Mt_a.
40OKS11
,vitcoxows cvrt "
ON AAAMMEA
r,," DOC *=Pm FOR FILE NO tft THE 00 Of THE Cou""r
:LE of 4EfFEXSO*4 C"TY AT OOLOCW COLOINA40. ON
-,,Ec-
D. i9q-z. AT02-OLAO'CLOCIt
CIA CLiillill, A AA t 4
IS � e ES Z
1 41 1 1 1 1: ' l l po Z
"d
I"
Ii:
litokA"IS DO 0"* I3.
IS"
PROJECT 12( i"1•1
r
6x ri
City of Wheat Ridge
Planning Commission
7500 W. 29' Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 10033
Re. Applewood Preserve Development
Dear Members of the Planning Commission.
Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or
income, if permitted to be used onIN under the conditions allowed by
regulation for the district in which it is located`
2 Is the plight of the owner due to unique. circumstances?
If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the
locality?
4, Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical
condition of the property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the
owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of'
the regulations were carried out?
5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be
applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning
classification?
0
Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make
money out of the property?
& Would the granting of the variation be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which
the property is located?
Sincerely,
David Schneider, President
Applewood Building Company, Inc
J=7 %, i f I I
%-Wor%-Iq a I -r ', 14
ps
I
| �
a
•
•
I
I
X"
ow z - onv
I
m
C*
0
rs
0
0
0
Tl
u
it
72
Vi
Qr
0 U w
14 w c
c o
0 4 ZP 0
U
0
0
0
Q
r :
I
0
0 0 to
0
c 44
0 u
Cl
*7 a?
Fn
Ll tn
72
0 a
4J
1 wa
0 0
Ti
:z
X"
ow z - onv
I
m
CC
0
0
1 C-,
0
72
Vi
Qr
0 U w
14 w c
c o
0 4 ZP 0
U
0
0
0
Q
r :
I
0
0 0 to
0
c 44
0 u
w 0
Ll tn
72
0 a
0 0
-7,
X"
ow z - onv
I
m
CC
0
0
Vi
Qr
0 U w
14 w c
c o
0 4 ZP 0
U
0
0
0
Q
r :
0
0 0 to
0
c 44
0 u
w 0
Ll tn
0 a
0 0
41
z V)
ct
41 0
a 0
0 to
.c
41
—4
It
LA-
0
44
wo
0
�4
:j
W
P4 .1e
I V) M 44 t
:1 T
a
>
o
cr �z
wi
W cry t17 L
c w
o
0
0
C
IJ
u 0
0
C 0
0 C
7p
_2
14:
r r-
41
�j
c
a
X"
ow z - onv
I
m
I
I
I
CC
Vi
Qr
I
I
I
i
P'7 1„ (7 0, ") rr U)
0 to ", " ::, 0 ca
0
rY to to
0 :
to :7 0 P t'O t9
z
t'fs 0
to
0
t.
-r 0
(0 kv
C l
rT cv Vt CT r,
to
(D
to
0
Q rr
C
0 CS
r,
rT
c
0 t j
0 rf
0
X #— rt
rr C
0 to
of
rir.
cr
rT
rt
fo
rr CL • F , ° 0 C
rr r+
0
0 rn 0 a 0
0
CT
0
0
rr " P h3
0 aT
:7- ri co
" (0 r,
(D H tp
0 u`3 CT PU
:3
:u ul
0 0
(0, cr
:3
CT
0
zi
m
•
•
a
O
rq
Q
CJ
fJ
LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Planning and Development Department
750( welt 26th A,enue. Wheat Ridge. CO 80033
Phone 1 1303) 235-2846
Flea4e print or type all mformation�
Applicant ress Phone
Cltv _t, vct k oe State ( Zip �CO'S 3 Fax
Owner Address , a=!�, 4 n(.6 Phone
State Zip Fax
Contact Address Phone
cltv State Zip Fax
I'lic pei�cm listed as contact ill be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necces
Pont pubh: 1waring si.gm and M i6ceive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing)
Location of request (address): 'A 1 -3 1 W , 3z Avr:::;o U 6-
Detailed de�cripnon of the request:
PR PLAT
mm
.e.. .. d .. a.,... .... .... .. ef. ..., a.e.: ..r 3 e , € YF ...... a. ..... ..a -. ..e r: ".. .v . ^,...,... ,.... e.. ..v. , ee a . ,.t
r [
....r a ... v _ S. Y .,.. .. ,. .. .♦ ., e. .a. <. .... ... o., r n e.e �' .. � .. R . FY '
f..1 .De s.. S,r r. . .._ ..ea i,. o . L e 'e e.. < ...1 ..,• .a..a. .a. ,..,w ... ..4 ., aft .. ...e = 0. E W .�
.. .. J.. .r _. ' .... {.... ... ..i „ 2 .. f.,, .5 .: '; ...v.• » .. ,. x rot k s , ...'., vrr :.... .< ., ,... .. \.,. .,1 y:..A C
5 '
5
m
a R �
i t..
.rF .. .:r i ., l ➢D. ,"e . \fir " -. `i ' } : a 4
n
t „
APPLEWOOD BUILDING COMPANY, INC., BEING THE OWNER OF THE REAL PROPERTY
CONTAINING 3.9142 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
AND HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED SAID LAND AS PER THE DRAWING
HEREON CONTAINED UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE_ OF APPLEWOOD PRESERVE
SUBDIVISION, A. SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO,
AND BY THESE PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THE
PUBLIC THE PORTIONS SHOWN AS RIGHT OF WAY, AND DO FURTHER DEDICATE TO T'r9E
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND 'THOSE MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND /OR MUNCIPALLY FRANCH
UTILITIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS EASEMENTS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION', OPERATION, MAINTENANCE REPAIR AND
REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES, THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO TELPHONE
AND ELECTRIC LINES GAS LINES, WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES, HYDRANTS,
STORM WATER SYS'TE`MS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS, STREET LIGHTS AND ALL
c
THE EAST 110 FEET OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST '1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF - THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 LYING SOUTH OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3
SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF "THE 61-H P.M. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO,
EXCEPT
THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,
THAT PART OF THE SOUTH WEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUT1 -I
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TI'1 P.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT .A POINT ON THE EAST'
AND WEST HALF SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET WEST OF THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4' OF 'THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION: THENCE EAST 110 FEET; THENCE NORTH 395 FEET;
THENCE WEST 110 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 395 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
EXCEPT
THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF.
F aME1
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST AND WEST 1/2 SECTION LINE 285 FEET WEST OF THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 'THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M,
RUNNING THENCE EAST ON THE HALF SECTION LINE 175 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH SECTION
LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE RIGHT- OF -WAY OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH: THENCE WES'.ERLrr
ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID DITCH TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH PARALLEL WITH
SECTION LINE FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE: SOUTH TO BEGINNING, EXCEPTING ALL
DITCH AND ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
� F.�C�IP'1'L�1`a OF P4�9F�R7'Y
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST A ONE._QU RIER OF THE NOPTH'VEST ONE-
QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINC
MERIDIAN, CITY OF WPEATRIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY COLORADO DESCRIBED AS FOLLO'W'S:
COMMENCING A.T THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 27;
THENCE S69'29 "35 "W ON AN ASSUMED BEARING ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID NORTHWEST
ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF '1766.11 FEET;
THENCE 1`400 11'44 "W, PARALLEL WITH THE EAST UNE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF' IHE
SOUTHWEST' ONE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE OF SAID SECTION 27 A DISTANCE
OF 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT LYING ON THE NORTH LINE
OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK. 184 AT PAGE 541 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY
RECORDS;
THENCE CONTINUING NOO`11'44 "W, PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 365.00
FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NUMBER
83075045 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS;
THENCE N89 °29'36 "E, ALONG 'THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET
TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT;
THENCE N00°11'44 "W, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST ONE - -HALF, A DISTANCE OF
436.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN DITCH;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES;
N45`55'O7"W,A DISTANCE OF 49.12 FEET;
THENCE N59'56'03 0 W, A DISTANCE OF 18.38 FEET;
THENCE S77'42'28 "W. A DISTANCE OF 9.72 FEET;
THENCE S05 °46'29 "E, .A DISTANCE OF 26.64 FEET';
THENCE S02`17'44 "E, A DISTANCE OF 45.19 FEE I';
THENCE S1 6'42'47 "W, A DISTANCE OF 51.93 FEET;
THENCE 552'41'46 "W, A DISTANCE OF 40.66 FEET,
THENCE N84'21'WW, A DISTANCE OF :33.13 FEET,
THENCE N79'4.5'11 "W, A DISTANCE OF 25.12 FEET;
THENCE N60'13'10 "W, A DISTANCE OF 41.94 FEET;
THENCE 146806 °15 "W, A DISTANCE OF 18.02 FEET;
THENCE N74'55'36 "W, A DISTANCE OF 17.15 FEET;
THENCE 569'04'32 "W, A DISTANCE OF 10.19 FEET;
THENCE S40"13'23 "W, A DISTANCE OF 25.30 FEET;
THENCE S80'29'38'W, A DISTANCE OF 21.56 FEET;
THENCE S58 A DISTANCE OF 8.05 FEET;
THENCE SOO 12'42 "E, PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE- QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 27, A DISTANCE OF 70719 FEET TO ,A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF A.
PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 384 AT PAGE 541;
THENCE N$9 '29'36 ° E, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 175.01 FEET TO TINE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 3.9142 ACRES (170,504 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS
l M
APPLEWOM BUILDING COMPANY, INC.
BY:
3333 OAK SSTR E� T iD,ER, PRESIDENT
WI4EAT RIDGE, GO 60033
STATE OF COLORADO } 55
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON �
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENTWAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS___QAY OF A<D. __ 2000.
BY DAVID R. SCHNEIDER, PRESIDENT
WITNNESS MY NAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISVON EXPIRES
NOTARY PUBLIC
CASE fUSTORY
WS -00 -01
ASPEN Surveying Inc
2393 So. PEORIA STREET
Sul 1E G -10
Aurora, CO &0014
Phone (303) 750 -4590
BY:
DEPUTY
MEET 1. of 2
LE IS PRESERVE
DATE: 07 -18 -G0
L 1q z rr t _)! .TT_
1 ROGER A. A:RMAAS , A REGISTERED LAN,) SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO,
HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PLAT AND 1`HE SURVEY UPON WHICH IT IS BASED WAS Mt50Ei
. EI
.
UNDER MY DIRECT RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, SUPERMSION, AND CHECKING, AND I CERTIFY
THAT
_, ---
IT CONTAINS ALL THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 319-- 33.3 -20£1 C,P,S.
ROGER A. V RMAAS LS No. 24968
2993 5, PED' yGSC)
AURORA,. CO 80034
PH 303- 750 -4590 :.
Ki
App
£ r^
�t;"I�SIffT;; DOE "YPTF`Tl� "CCY1Zin!"6u - - --
c -
a
Y %- - -- 'S" CST C"__- MR� 7 T� �SF�
k I
- ��-
.g (1 '.
Lht�TT.ATc;; "�FiI A �!
Ili
I
ij,"
Tv°
_ �
� AC�N� TY
CT",^??5F - V r Ea, , ` 1 "n'OE - Ri C N
P ?i?SSIQ C: P7'IFICACE,
THIS IS TO CERTIFY IHAT THE WITHIN PLAT HAS SEEN ,APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO
NOTES
1.
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4
SECTION 27 ASSUMED TO BEAR N 59'30'06 E BETWEEN THE
MONUMENTS SHO>M HEREON,
2.
'THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY ASPEN
SURVEYING, INC. TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND
TITLE OF RECORD, ASPEN SURVEYING, INC. RELIED UPON THE
MAYORS � C RTII'IC � �'E
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE, COMMITMENT NO. W035971AOO,
s
PREPARED BY SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, COhRNSIT44ENT
DATE JUNE 2, 2000,
THIS IS TO CERTIFY D;AT THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, BY M0T10N OF !T'S
CITY COUNCQ, DID ON THIS DAY OF2000, ADOPT AND APPROVE
3.
ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, AI -TERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC
THE WITHIN PLAT AND .ACCEPT THE DEDICATIONS HERE014 MADE.
LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT' OR ACCESSORY,
COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATT TE
16 -4---508 G.R.S.
4,
PROPERTY LINE ALONG 'THE SOU114 LINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN
DITCH, BASED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PREPARED BY
LANE ENGINEERING SERVICES. INC. PROJECT A87 -4, DATED 6/8/2000.
5.
'TRACT A SHALL BE DESIGNATED FOR USE AS A STORM DETENTION
EASEMENT', ACCESS TO THIS TRACT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PUBLIC
AGENCIES FOR MAINTENANCE AS REQUIRED,
6,
NO PORTION OF THE SURVEYED PROPERTY LIES WITHIN AN AREA OF
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD, AS SHOWN' ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO.
085079 0005 C, CITY OF `. EAT RIDGE, COLORADO, EFFECTIVE DATE:
FEBRUARY 4, 1988, ZONE Ca
7,
NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL_
ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN T141S SURVEY WTHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU
DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT'. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY
LEE - I'v{a D I' �v k LF CCaAT_ION
DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE
STATE OF COLORADO }
OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON,
COUNTY OF .JEFFERSON ) SS
8,
ZONING ON SITE IS R - I
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT T`HfS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
9<
PRIOR T4 THE REMOVAL OF ANY TREE ON THE FACE OF 7"HIS PLAT, APPROVAL
JEFF - I RSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AT_ O'CLOCK_,_ M. OIV THIS
MUST BE RECEIVED FROM TINE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 'DEPARTMENT
_.. OF 2000, AND IS DULY RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.
REMOVAL OF MATURE TREES WILL BE ALLOWED ONLY WHEN IN DIRECT CONFLICT
RECEPTION
MATH A BUILDING FOOTPRINT, DRIVEWAY OR IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEW HOME
CONST RUCTION,
BY:
DEPUTY
MEET 1. of 2
LE IS PRESERVE
DATE: 07 -18 -G0
mm
y d
W 1d4 COR
SEC 27
FN 31/4
BRASS CAP
IN RANGE BOX
L.S. 13212
rl
m-
>
En
00
m cl i
1
is
m
r .
GRAPHIC SCALE
K MMT)
I inehl= 30 ft,
2 0,3'
G 1/4 SEC.
END 3 1/4"
IN RANGE E
L"S. 113212
CAP
NO0'11'44W 436.01'
j
\END 1/2' REBAR'
NO -CAP
FND\1 1/2 , �LUY CAP S
LOT 2 T 34 1
RE FPRON NO. 0 3Z
LS. 1�837
LOT 3 LOT 4 L OT 5 LOT 6
ZONF-D R--'
LEGEND
0 SET REBAR & CAP L.S. 24968
0 PROPERTY CORNFR (AS 'NOTED)
PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF MY TREE DESIGNATED ON TFIE FACE
OF THIS PLAT, APPROVAL MUST BE RECEIVED FROM THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEP. RTMEIC1, RB40VAL OF MATURE TREES
INILL BE ALLOVER ONLY *481 IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A BUILDING
FOOTPRINT, DRIVEWAY M IkPRDWMFNTS FOR THE NEW HOME
CONSTRUCTION.
g, In c.
AS 'N' Surveyin
2993 So. PEORIA STREET
SUITE G_IG
Aurora. CO 80014
Phone (303) 750-4590
aMEM_ 1) PAIN �kG EN_OT_E
!'III STORIM WMER DETENTION / RETENTION AREA SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND
MAINTAINED BY THE OWNERS, HEIRS, SUC AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SAID
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
-
SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENITER SUCH AREA(S) AND PERFORM THE NECESSARY WORK, THE
- COST OF WAICH, SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY UPON BELUNG.
NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WLL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION /RETENTION AREA(S'; AND
{TO CHANCES OR ALTERATICINS *FEC THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERIS1 OF V -
,- ENT 0 N" N 5 1 4-47
DE T O N /RETENTION PON 6 RE -(S) MILL BE MADE W ITHOUT THE APPR OF THE CITY ENGINEER. C 0 N 4
NE P
EIGHT—FOOT (8') WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY W
GRANTED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE
FRONT AND REAR LOT LINES OF EACH LOT IN THE
SUBDIVISION OR PLATTED AREA. THESE EASEMENTS
ARE DEDICATED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, 7
AND REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEVISION
CABLE, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. UTILITIES
SHALL ALSO BE PERMITTED WITHIN ANY ACCESS
EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE STREETS IN ME SUDIVISION.
PERMANIETIT STRUCTURES AND WATER METERS SHALL
NOT BE PERMIT WMIN SAID EASEMENTS,
CASE HISTORY
WS-00-01
FtNAL PLAT
FOR
e th In
7101 "I
� n . �£ �>u 4 {R t , i � 4 ,t< L `ji �S s 9
Imog,,4
I M
I. 5.
A PORTION OF THE N 1/4, SECTTON 27, T3S, R69W OF THE 6th PK
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, STATE 0'F COLORADO
SHEET 1 OF 2
DEDICATION
APPLEWOOD BUILDING COMPANY, INC., BEING THE OWNER OF THE REAL PROPERTY
CONTAINING 3.9142 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
AND HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED SAID LAND AS PER, THE DRAWING
HEREON CONTAINED UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF APPLEWOOD PRESERVE
SUBD`,ISION, A" SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY 01: WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO,
AND BY THESE PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF MEAT RIDGE AND THE
PUBLIC THE PORTIONS SHOWN AS RIGHT OF WAY, AND DO FURTHER DEDICATE TO 'PIE
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THOSE MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND/OR MIUNCIPALLY FRANCI-11SED
UTILITIES AND SERVCES THOSE POR11ONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS EASEMENTS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE REPAIR AND
REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO TELPHONE
AND ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LINES, WATER AND SANITARY SEWER DIN ES, HYDRANTS,
�_
STORM WATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS, STREET LrHTS AND ALL
APPURTENANCES THERETO,
PARCEL 4
IHE EAST 110 FEET OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 112 OF TPE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 LYING SOUTH OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN 017Ci OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3
SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF jEFFERS(AI, STATE OF COLORADO,
EXCEPT
THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PART OF THE SOUTH WEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 UF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH, P.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEG:4NNNG AT A POINT ON THE EAST
AND WEST HALF SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET WEST OF THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST /2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE EAST 110 FEET; THENCE NORTH 395 FEET;
THENCE WEST 110 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 395 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT o BEGINNING,
EXCEPT
THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF.
PARCEL B
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST AND tAIEST 1/2 SECTION LINE 285 FEET WEST OF - IHF
Sot.HHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF I , Hc SOUIHW FSF 11/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 27. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 64 'NEST OF [HE 6TH P.I
RUNNING THENCE EAST ON THE HALF SECTION LINE 175 FEE IHENCE NORTH PARALLEL WTH SECTION
LINE TO:'THE SOUTH LINE OF THE RIGHT -OF--WAY OF THE ROCKY WOUNININ DITCH; THENCE VrESTERLY
ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID DITCH TO A POINT WHICH IS Il{ PARA! _L EL WI TH
SECTION LINE FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTH TD BEGINNING, Ex(_`EPT!NG al-L
DITCH AND ROAD RtGH1S--OF-'NA",% COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, Sr4t[ r)- COirNRADO.
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST ONC-OljARIER 1F THE NORTHWEST ONE
QUTARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 61H PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY COLORADO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID sECTK)N 27;
MENCE S89 29'36 "W ON AN ASSUMED BEARING ALONG, THE 50 LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 1766.11 FEET;
T PARALLEL WITH 11
TH ENCE NOO E EAS LINE OF T HE IM I37 ONE-HALF OF THE
SOUTHWEST ONE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE OF SAID SECTION 27 A DISTANCE
OF 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT I-PING ON THE NORTH LINE
OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 184 AT PAGE 54 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY
RECORDS;
THENCE CONTINUING N00 PARALLEL WTFI SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 365.00
FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND D`z(',RIBED IN RECEPTION NUMBER
83075045 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS;
THENCE 1189'29'36"E, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT, c DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET
10 THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT;
THENCE NOO ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST ONEHALF, A. DISTANCE OF
436.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ROCKY UDUNTAIN DITCH;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE THE rOLLOWNG COURSES:
N45'55'07"4Y A DISTANCE OF 49,12 FEET;
THENCE N59*56'03 A DISTANCE OF '8.38 8,38 FEET;
THENCE S77'42'28 - W, A DISTANCE OF 9.72 FEET;
THENCE S05'46'29"E, A DISTANCE OF 26.64 FEET:
'PHENCE S0217'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 45-19 FEE T;
THENCE 516*42'47"W, A DI S' ' 'ANCE OF 5t99 FEET;
THENCE S52*41'46"W. A DISTANCE OF 40.66 FEET
THENCE N84'21'1 "W, A DISTANCE OF 33.13 FEET
I
THENCE N79'49'11"W, A DISTANCE OF 25.12 FEET;
THENCE N601 S1 O"W, A DISTANCE OF 41.94 FEET;
THENCE N68'06*15"W, A DISTANCE OF 1 8.02 FEET;
THENCE N74*55'36"W, A DISTANCE OF 17.15 FEED;
THENCE S69 A DISTANCE OF 10.19 FEET;
THENCE S40'1 3'23'W, A DISTANCE OF 25,30 FEET;
THENCE 580*29*38'tV, A DISTANCE OF 21.56 FEET;
T S58'56'28'W, A DISTANCE OF 8,05 FEET;
] 600'1 2'42 "E, PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-OUARIER OF
SAID SECTION 27, A DISTANCE OF 707.79 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF A
PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 184 AT PAGE 541;
THENCE N59'29'36"E, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF "75.01 FEET TO THE M )E
POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 3.9142 ACRES (1 70,504 S01 ,ARE FEET), MORE OR LESS
OWER
APPLEWOOD BUILDING COMPANY, INC.
m
PRESIDENT
STATE OF COLORADO SS
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENTWAS ACKNOWUDGED BEFORE ME TIHIS__.DAY OF AD, - 2001.
BY DAVID R. SCHNEIDER, PRESIDENT
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
GEMERAL N-QT-Ea
1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ME SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 7/4
SECTION 27 ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89 E BETIAEEN THE
MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON.
2- THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY ASPEN
SURVEYING, INC. TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RWT`S-OF-WAY AN[)
TITLE OF RECORD, ASPEN SURVEYING, INC. RELIED UPON THE
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE, COMMITMENT NO. W035971ACO,
PREPARED BY SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, COMMITMENT
DATE JUNE 2, 2000.
3. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC
LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY,
COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT 10 STATE STATUTE
18-4-508 ClR«S-
4. PROPERTY LINE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN
DITCH, BASED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PREPARED BY
LANE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. PROJECT A87-4, DATED 6/8/2000.
5, TRACT A SHALL BE DESIGNATED FOR USE AS A STORM DETENTION
EASEMENT. ACCESS TO THIS TRACT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PUBLIC
AGENCIES FOR MAINTENANCE AS REQUIRED.
S. NO PORTION OF THE SURVEYED PROPERTY LIES WITHIN AN AREA OF
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD, AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No.
085079 0005 C. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, CCILORADO, EFFECTIVE DATE.
FEBRUARY 4, 1988, ZONE C,
7. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO 'LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL
ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY MINN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU
DISCOVER. SUCH DEFECT, IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY
DEFECT IN 'THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM 17HE [)ATE
OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOW HEREON,
✓. ZONING ON SITE IS R - 1
1, ROGER A. VERMAAS I A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO,
HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PLAT AND THE SUPVKY UPON WHICH IT IS BASED WAS MAEA
UNDER MY DIRECT RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, SUPERVISION, AND CHECKING, AND 1 CERTIFY
4- rrIA7 IT CONTAINS ALL THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION
2993 S. PEORIA #G10
AURORA, CO 80014
PH 303-750-
APPROVED:
F�A_T_N_0_T_E2
1, THE STORM DETENTION AREA HERE SHOWN AS 'TRACT A' SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE
PROPERTY OWNERS, IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID
PROPERTY DINNERS. THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIG14T TO ENTER SUCH AREA
AND PERFORM THE NECESSARY WORK. THE COST OF MICH SAID PROPERTY OWNERS, AGREES
TO PAY UPON BILLING, NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION
AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF
THE DETENTION/ AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER,
2. RIGHM-OF-WAY
A. THE PROPERTY OWNERS AGREE TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD AND SAFE CONDITION THE LAWN,
TREES, AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED WATERING SYSTEM LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT
APPLE VODOD PRESERW SUBDIVISION,
B. THE PROPERTY OMERS AGREE TO MAINTAIN A CLEA14 AND ATTRACTIVE APPEARANCE OF
THEIR STREET FRONTAGE INCLUDING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
C. 'THE PROPERTY OWNERS AGREE TO SHARE THE ANNUAL COSTS FOR MAINTENANCE IF
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IS FORMED AND UTILITY COSTS (ELECTRICAL AND WATER) OF THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS.
D. THE PROPERTY OWNERS AGREE TO MEET AS OFTEN AS NECESSARY TO EVALUATE THE
MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS AND TO TAKE APPROPRIATE AC11ON TO INSURE PROPER
MAINTENANCE.
9, FAILUM TO COMPLY
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS NUMBERS 1, OR 2. Wil REQUIRE 'THE
CITY OF MEAT RIDGE TO COMPLETE THE NECESSARY WORK WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN
APPLEWOOD PRESERVE, INCURRING ALL COSTS FOR RAE WORK,
FIGHT-FOOT (W) WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
ADJACENT 1*0 THE FRONT AND REAR LOT LINES OF EACH LOT IN THE SIOBDIVIR31ON OR PLATTED
AREA, THESE EASEMENTS ARE DEDICATED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND
REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRICAL- OAS, TELEVISION, CABLE, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES,
UTILITIES SHALL ALSO BE PERMITTED WITHIN ANY ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE STREETS IN
IHE SUBDIVISION, PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHAH NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN SAID UTILITY
EASEMENTS.
01"""M -III �In FILIC IN( RPS
7 T,,7 PS T El I A 0 P l E AN Lf_ A, H
r 7 --
GE CH Air MAN 0I
Pws mi
=-T-, — IT F_W`�
PLANWNG COMMISSIOIq CEETIRCATI�'_
THIS IS To CEKT THAT THE WITHIN F HAS BEEN APPRO�)`EC 9,Y THE PLANNING
c( THE CI - 'Y OF WHEAT RDCr' COLORADO
MAYORS CERTIFICATE
FHIS IF 1 1) ICEPT!Fl iHaT THE CITY Or W-lEil RIDGE, COLORADO, BY MOTION OF IT'S
C Y 1')UN0i_ DR) ON THIS OF_ 2041, ADOPT AND APPROVE
WI THIN PI-4T AND ACCEPT THE DEDICA HFIREON MADE.
A T 7' S7
C LE
STATE OF COLORADO Ss
COUNTY OF dEF1-_ERSON
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
C
JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER A7____�D'CL0CK__M. ON T'HIS
_ _DAY Of 2001, AND IS DULY RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.
RECEPRON______,
NOTARY PUBLIC
CASE HISTOPtY
INS- 00 __ Q I
AS'1-__).EN' 5"`urve,,yTz,tjg, Inc.
2093 So. PEORIA STREET
SUIT- 0-10
ALIFOrO, CO 80014
Phone (303) 750-4590
BY: --
DEPUTY
MCINTrY MAP
I Al PLAT
FOR
I w 11 11 1 1 111 1
M i
ag
flat" ... le
Fa w " I'll K.
W 1/4 COR SEC 27
FNO 3 1/4 BRASS CAP
IN RANGE BOX
L.S. 13212
l
-J�
Ci
UMPLATTED WIM 'p-1
-ND PIN W/ CAP
/UNPIEADABLE
S00'j 2'4 2' E
10' U EASE MEWIF
LOT I
LOT 2
A PORTION OF T NW 114, SECII'ION . T'. R69W OF rill- 6th P.0
CITY OF HE RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEETI 2 OF 2
LOIF 1
0
30
RE"'EP NO 42 'Z� NED R. 1
g FWI" PIN W/ CAP
W",�_CAP I-, � I" I II NRE ADABLE
NID I/ REOAM1R
`4 0 C A P� C -A-AB'E
E VV
. .... ...... ..... "1 11 0 ' I '
"pr} 07' 58 7n 5
L. >5
S 4 0 3x
2 '0'
0 T 6
T
�d
Ilk"
In
M .1 ,
a) R 51 "0 17 r
AE
N
6'0
macio
to
�n
' <
0 6'21 ' K Li
2 4, 7
IV ?.5. >
/'Del zu=2,.I'38'24"
10 U 'E 'N--
GRAPHIC S(CALE
( N M
1 inch 30
ZONED R--1
IRM COURT
50' R,O.W. HEREBY DEDICATED BY IHIS PLAT
hil q0*11'44' W 5 9 C'!
M
C 1/4 SEC. 27
FND 3 1/4" BRASS CAP
IN RANGE BOX
L.S. 1321
'`ND 1 1/2' ALUM CAP
L - 57
mur PoTyr OF
BEOPMRG
ZONED R-1
!XG
�
0 -SET RKDAR & CAP '11S, 24966
0 PROPEPITV CORNEIR (AS NOTED)
PND 1 1/2' AI-0M, CAP
L.S. 16837
-2 ' 4'4 6 �66' 1'
L - 22. ,19
: L I 1 3
1 0) 0)
"A
C14
�
LIOT !0
Z
uj
-z E J UJ
ru
:5
- TIR A 1r.' T A
F R M DE DO. "
7 Z
0' Ulii-i— i F4,SEMEN�/
10 UTUTY ""ASUMEM
l'N 1 5 , 112 RE51,R
N CAP'
I)AV0 SUBDIVISION
1 2 FIND 1 1/2" ALUM . CAP NO. �3433(4
L Cj
ASPE`11 Suirve.
yingr, Jnc.
29G,3 So. PEORIA STREE'r
Surrf, C-10
Aurora, CO 80014
Phone, (.303) 750-4590
3.38"
WE
0
E-
1
it�
10
-
UMPLATTED WIM 'p-1
-ND PIN W/ CAP
/UNPIEADABLE
S00'j 2'4 2' E
10' U EASE MEWIF
LOT I
LOT 2
A PORTION OF T NW 114, SECII'ION . T'. R69W OF rill- 6th P.0
CITY OF HE RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEETI 2 OF 2
LOIF 1
0
30
RE"'EP NO 42 'Z� NED R. 1
g FWI" PIN W/ CAP
W",�_CAP I-, � I" I II NRE ADABLE
NID I/ REOAM1R
`4 0 C A P� C -A-AB'E
E VV
. .... ...... ..... "1 11 0 ' I '
"pr} 07' 58 7n 5
L. >5
S 4 0 3x
2 '0'
0 T 6
T
�d
Ilk"
In
M .1 ,
a) R 51 "0 17 r
AE
N
6'0
macio
to
�n
' <
0 6'21 ' K Li
2 4, 7
IV ?.5. >
/'Del zu=2,.I'38'24"
10 U 'E 'N--
GRAPHIC S(CALE
( N M
1 inch 30
ZONED R--1
IRM COURT
50' R,O.W. HEREBY DEDICATED BY IHIS PLAT
hil q0*11'44' W 5 9 C'!
M
C 1/4 SEC. 27
FND 3 1/4" BRASS CAP
IN RANGE BOX
L.S. 1321
'`ND 1 1/2' ALUM CAP
L - 57
mur PoTyr OF
BEOPMRG
ZONED R-1
!XG
�
0 -SET RKDAR & CAP '11S, 24966
0 PROPEPITV CORNEIR (AS NOTED)
PND 1 1/2' AI-0M, CAP
L.S. 16837
-2 ' 4'4 6 �66' 1'
L - 22. ,19
: L I 1 3
1 0) 0)
"A
C14
�
LIOT !0
Z
uj
-z E J UJ
ru
:5
- TIR A 1r.' T A
F R M DE DO. "
7 Z
0' Ulii-i— i F4,SEMEN�/
10 UTUTY ""ASUMEM
l'N 1 5 , 112 RE51,R
N CAP'
I)AV0 SUBDIVISION
1 2 FIND 1 1/2" ALUM . CAP NO. �3433(4
L Cj
ASPE`11 Suirve.
yingr, Jnc.
29G,3 So. PEORIA STREE'r
Surrf, C-10
Aurora, CO 80014
Phone, (.303) 750-4590
3.38"