Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/20/2001
following The # Commission # # # September i of retained w !# office of the City Clerk and in the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Wheat Ridge. 4. APPROVE • r OF AGENDA presented. It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner COLLINS to approve the agenda as motion passed 6. PUBLIC FORUM , There was no one to appear before Commission. l • i A. Case No. WZ-00-08: An application submitted • Janet Daughenbaugh for approval a rezoning from Residential-Two (R-2) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and approval • an outline development plan and final development plan and plat for property located at 4240 Kipling Street. Commissioner SNOW asked if streetscaping standards were in effect for this project. Meredith Reckert explained that this application was in process before the streetscape standards were adopted. Alan White explained that the streetscape plan calls for buildings to fit in with surrounding development and the proposed plan would meet that criteria. Commissioner THOMPSON stated that if this property is used for the same C- I uses that are presently in use for the adjacent properties, she would like to see an eight-foot fence between the subject property and the residential property on the east side. She would also like to have requirement for all garage doors to be closed to cut down on noise from activities inside the garages. I In response to a question from Commissioner SNOW, Mike Garcia explained that there was an approval letter from the president of the Ouelette Ditch in the final drainage report. Pt . MNI!1" explained that the floodplain administrator determined that there would be minimal impact to the floodplain and that drainage met all standards. ditch is lined with concrete. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if staff had concerns about the loading dock being located next to R-IA property. Meredith Reckert replied that increased buffering was requested. application was started before the requirements were in place. Commissioner BRINKMAN questioned why this property is shown as low density residential on the Comprehensive Plan. Alan White stated that this was simply an oversight on the Comprehensive Plan. ,',Chair McNAMEE declared a recess at 9:00 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:13 p.m.) Planning Commission Page 2 September 6, 2001 Janet 0 j* 4 1 d R oad, MEM MUM holding area to be enclosed with noncombustible material per city requirements. The amendment was accepted. Commissioner SNOW offered a friendly amendment to increase the amount of landscaping to a minimum of 20%. Commissioner THOMPSON did not accept this amendment to her original motion. Commissioner SNOW offered a friendly amendment to add an additional handicapped space and that the space be a van space. Commissioner SNOW stated she would vote against the motion because, while the city has been working on streetscaping plans, this is a cement block building with no requirements for paint, uniformity of fronts of bungs, nothing about the glass and nothing to make it an upgrading of Kipling. It is necessary to set a precedent toward improving Kipling. IWIT I t 4 Xt V - T ion passIST W R TA f Q - F71 im no. Commissioner COLLINS expressed concern about the sidewalk being placed immediately adjacent to Kipling. Chair McNAMEE expressed concern that the application was in process prior to adoption of the streetscape requirements and the code provided that streetscape requirements should not apply in such cases. Alan White stated there was another section that provides if the applicant lirtLitary or outline. but not final a'Dvroval, that it must conform to the new regulation�. The motion passed 6-1 with Chair McNAMEE voting no. I Planning Commission Page 4 September 6, 2001 Chair McNAMEE requested that some of the "legalese" be removed from the ordinance. It was moved by Commissioner COLLINS and seconded by Commissioner COOPER that Case No. ZOA-01-03 be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval with the following amendments: 1. In paragraph A, fourth line, the words "of said" be removed and in the fifth line the word "the" be changed to "these" and the word "hereof" be removed. 2. In paragraph C, the last word "hereof' be removed. The motion passed unanimously. A. Case No. ZOA-01-02 — An ordinance amending Sections 26-206, 26-207, 26-208, 26- 209, 26-210, 26-211, 26-212 and 26-611 • the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws pertaining to required setbacks for residential structures and exceptions thereto. FRIV EMU• There was discussion about commercial requirements. Commissioner SNOW expressed residential property. It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner THOMPSON that Irm t t t t t J?JaM4Ug in Section 26-611 (b) the following words be added: "provided, however, that no encroachment to side or rear yard is allowed when adjacent to a residentially zoned property." The motion passed unanimously. B. Clear Creek ?�oning — Commissioner Collins asked about the status of rezoning along Clear Creek. Alan White stated that a legal description needs to be prepared before an ordinance can be drafted. Planning Commission Page 5 September 6, 2001 12. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner COLLINS to adjourn the meeting at 10:20 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. MARIAN McNAMEE, Chair almil Planning Commission Page 6 September 6, 2001 'v(#,: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: September 20,2001 ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a two lot minor subdivision for property 12225 W. 35 Ave. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 12225 W. 35 Ave. IIAME &,4.10110AESS 41F ATPLICANT(S)- WM I wa L 1 11 0 a &M US - t Ryan Shacklett 12225 W. 35 Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Same as Above APPROXIMATE AREA: 32,401 ft. PRESENT ZONING: R-1, Residential-One Single Family Residential N: and W: R-1, Residential-One S and E: R- I A,Residential-One A N: W: S: and F. Single Family Residential This minor subdivision creates two lots. The property currently has a single family home which fronts on W- 35 Ih Ave, The structure is situated on what will become Lot 1 • this subdivision. An additional lot will be created (Lot 2) in the rear of the existing single family residence. Easements have been reserved adjacent to the property lines as required by the City's Subdivision Regulations for utilities and access. This is a minor subdivision without public street dedication and as suc requires Planning Commission actionlonly. I ince ne neign Ming was 1 YU , btall flab IM'UfVri#7ff#7A 11 this minor subdivision application thus far. Planning Commission Page 2 MS -01 -01 /Shacklett All service agencies can serve the property as currently developed and when developed with an additional single family home. Any necessary system improvements, taps and meters will be at the applicant's expense, *n Yor imes for the installation and maintenance of utilities. These easements are discussed in general note #6 and are depicted graphically on the plat document. Consolidated Mutual Water Company will provide domestic water service to the property. Per the company's requirements, each separate structure must be served by a separate tap and meter and each property must front a company main. The portion of Lot 2 which connects to W 35 Ave. allows that lot to meet their requirement for service, Wheat Ridge Fire District will provide service, to the property. The City Surveyor has reviewed the final plat document for completeness and has indicated that it is in compliance with the City's Subdivision Regulations. Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the applicant is subdividing a single parcel into two parcels in order to develop an additional single family home. The requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met and the parcels meet the lot area requirements of the R- I zoning district. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met, 2. The minimum lot size requirements of the R- I zoning district have been met. 3. The development standards of the R- I district have been met for the existing single family home. M 1, The underground irrigation ditch be labeled with the name Lee Stewart & Eskins Ditch and requested easements • provided and depicted on the plat. Planning Commission Page 3 MS-01-O 1/Shacklett V1. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS I Option A: "I move that Case No. MS-01-01, a request for a two lot minor subdivision for property located at 12225 W. 35 Avenue be APPROVED for the fallowing reasons: I . All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The minimum lot size requirements of the R-1 zoning district have been met. 3. The development standards of the R-1 district have been met for the existing single family home. 1. The underground irrigation ditch be labeled with the name Lee Stewart & Eskins Ditch and requested easements be provided and depicted on the plat. OptionB: "I move that Case No. MS-01-01, a request for a two lot minor subdivision for property located at 12225 W. 35 th Avenue be DENIED for the following reasons: I. 2. Y l Planning Commission Page 4 MS-01-Ol/Shacklett OE 29 Existing use/site conditions,:, 1 large lot with one single family residence, the remainder of the land is vacant. A Subdivide into two (2) lots to develop an additional single family home. �pplicants proposal: The existing single family structure will remain. The lots will meet or exceed the minimum lot size requirement of 12,500 sq. ft for the R -1 district. There were a few comments regarding the existing home fronting on W 35 Ave. and what would happen to it. The property owner responded that he will be totally refurbishing it and it will remain. His intent is • sell the home when renovation is complete. There was interest in what would be constructed on the rear lot. The property owner responded that his intent is • construct a bi-level home for his personal residence. The letter submitted by James Negri was read. There was a question relating to the value of the new home. The property owner responded that the market value of the new vacant lot is expected to be approx. $125-150,000 and he expects the total value of home and lot to be approx, $650,000. The home is planned to be about 2,500 square feet in size. There were questions regarding whether the existing home would be rented or sold. The property rental but would be selling it when the refurbishment is completed. Mh ._u Q v - 1 C c , � {4' > M CL CL CD z tx I Q t%� j F Iq I �.) Il -�Jl r EXHIBIT 3 .` > M CL CL CD z m, Cl m 0 To: City of Wheat Ridge Planning Department From.- rt A. Negri Subject: 12225 W. 35 Avenue interested in letting you know my opinion. Please + E • " given neighbor, Tom rt art •.. rt • E I than y ou s him voice opinion. N i it 1L PLAT BOOK PACE A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST NE- QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 CF 1 DEDICATORY STATEMENT I, RYAN SHACKLETT, BEING THE OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING 0.74 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 14) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE14) OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO; THENCE S 89 °39'40" W 768.24 FEET, THENCE N 00 °28'34 "W 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 89'39'40" W 111.46'; THENCE N 00'28'34" W 290.7 FEET, • THENCE N B9 °39'40" E 111.46 FEET; THENCE S 00'28'34" E 290.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 32,401 SQUARE FEET OR 0.74 ACRES MORE OR LESS. HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED SUCH LAND AS PER THE DRAWING HEREON CONTAINED UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF SHACKLE77'S SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COLORADO, ANDBY THESE PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEATRIDGE AND THOSE MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND /OR MUNICIPALLY FRANCHISED UTILITIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE_ AND ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LINES, WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES, HYDRANTS, STORM WATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS STREET LIGHTS AND ALL APPURTENANCES THERTO. OWNER: RYAN SHACKLETT LIEN: HOLDER: ROBERT SHACKLETT STATE_ OF COLORADO ) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MF THIS DAY OF -- --- _ A.D. 2001, BY RYAN SHACKELTT. 'A' Y . T& EC v � ,A�Y ygnln AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC APPROXIMATE LOCATION UNOERGOUND IRRIGATION LINE LOT 2 rn 19,901 S, F. f ZONED R -1 N C O Z rr T o � rn 0 GENERAL NOTES: 1. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 2. BASIS OF BEARING: THE ASSUMED BASIS OF BEARING OF S 89'39'40" W IS DEFINED BY MONUMENTS SET AND FOUND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NW % OF THE NE 1 4 OF SECTION 29 AS NOTED ON THE PLAT. 3. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: 7107101 4. DATE OF PLAT PREPARATION: 7/10/01. REVISED: 9170101 5. "THE OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS GRANTS LIMITED RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF ACCESS TO AND FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH THOSE AREAS INDICATED AS "CROSS ACCESS /INGRESS– EGRESS EASEMENTS ", AS ILLUSTRATED UPON THIS PLAT. SUCH GRANT OF EASEMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE OWNERS, TENANTS, CUSTOMERS, AND GUESTS OF THE OWNERS, AND SHALL FURTHERMORE GRANT ACCESS TO, AND FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH SAID EASEMEI >ITS TO THOSE ENTERING SAID EASEMENTS FROM SIMILARLY RECORDED EASEMENTS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND /OR FROM ABUTTING PUBLIC STREETS." 6. "TEN –FOOT (10') WIDE EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED ON PRIVATE FROPERTY ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC STREETS AND FRONT AND REAR PROPERTY LINES OF EACH LOT IN THE SUBDIVISION OR PLATTED AREA. FIVE –FOOT (5') WIDE EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO ALL SIDE LOT LINES OF EACH LOT IN THE SUBDIVISION OR PLATTED AREA. THESE EASEMENTS ARE DEDICATED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEVISION CABLE, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. UTILITIES SHALL ALSO BE PERMITTED WITHIN ANY ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE STREETS IN THE SUBDIVISION. PERMANENT STRUCTURES AND WATER METERS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN SAID UTILITY EASEMENTS. rs o � ru o � o � 0 UNPLATTED ZONED R -7 N 89 °39 E 1 1 1.46 10' U/E G� � N 89 °39'40" E f 01.46 ° 10 U/E FA ° N I N] w� S I. c r n x, 0 n n v cn v r*� LOT 1 12,500 S.F. 0.29 ACRE I 10 U/E S 89 °39'40" W 10.00' r S 89 0 39'40 " W 10 3' EXCEPTION TO CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE N FOR ROAD PURPOSES BK 2941, PG 652 Ut S 89'39'40" W 564.32 SW COR, NW 114 NE 114 SEC 29 FOUND 112" SQUARE PIN REPLACED WITH 3 114" CAP IN RIB APPLEWOOD VILLAGE ZONED R -1 A L / LOT 4 F17 SUB. tA 0 V � ow_` LOT 3 FITTS SUB. Irn GRAPHIC SCA LOT 2 FITTS SUB. 20 0 20 40 60 Scale 1" 20' VICINITY MAP not to scoh NOTE: FOUND NO. 3 REBAR � NO CAP 1.65' EAST OF SET COR. O C7 b O S 89 °39 '40" W 768.24' SITE 3 8th 0� . LOCATION W W 35 th AVE. 29 W 32nd AVE. 0 0 SE -OR NW 114 NE 114 SEC. 29 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE: 1, RICHARD E. HEINZ, A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OFiSHACKLETT'S SUBDIVISION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUES, ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. DATED THIS_.— DAY OF - 2001. RICHARD E. HEINZ, PLS #16116 245 MCKINLEY ST. BENNETT, COLORADO 80102 303- 956 -3047 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATION: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. DIRECTOR DATE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICA7 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN PLAT HAS BEEN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING AND DEVELOPME DIRECTOR DATE PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATON: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WITt ITN PLAT HAS BEEN THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WHEAT F CHAIR DATE MAYOR'S CERTIFICATION: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN PLAT HAS BEEN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE BY m BY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATION: ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY" CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, AT – O'CLOCK- M. ON THIS DAY OF —_ 2001. RECORDER DEPUTY LEGEND ® DENOTES SET NO. 5 REBAR /CAP P.L.S. 1611 DENOTES SET NO. 5 REBAR 3 114 AL. CAP IN RANGE BOX PLS 16116 MS- 01 -01. 0 n N� w � iv cs' c_„ m LOT 1 FITTS SUB. N _.. rn o c i m a GRAPHIC SCA LOT 2 FITTS SUB. 20 0 20 40 60 Scale 1" 20' VICINITY MAP not to scoh NOTE: FOUND NO. 3 REBAR � NO CAP 1.65' EAST OF SET COR. O C7 b O S 89 °39 '40" W 768.24' SITE 3 8th 0� . LOCATION W W 35 th AVE. 29 W 32nd AVE. 0 0 SE -OR NW 114 NE 114 SEC. 29 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE: 1, RICHARD E. HEINZ, A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OFiSHACKLETT'S SUBDIVISION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUES, ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. DATED THIS_.— DAY OF - 2001. RICHARD E. HEINZ, PLS #16116 245 MCKINLEY ST. BENNETT, COLORADO 80102 303- 956 -3047 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATION: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. DIRECTOR DATE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICA7 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN PLAT HAS BEEN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING AND DEVELOPME DIRECTOR DATE PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATON: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WITt ITN PLAT HAS BEEN THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WHEAT F CHAIR DATE MAYOR'S CERTIFICATION: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN PLAT HAS BEEN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE BY m BY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATION: ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY" CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, AT – O'CLOCK- M. ON THIS DAY OF —_ 2001. RECORDER DEPUTY LEGEND ® DENOTES SET NO. 5 REBAR /CAP P.L.S. 1611 DENOTES SET NO. 5 REBAR 3 114 AL. CAP IN RANGE BOX PLS 16116 MS- 01 -01. 0 n N� w � iv cs' c_„ m LOT 1 FITTS SUB. Attached is the ordinance with the changes to the residential setbacks as recommended by Planning Commission. It includes the change made to the Setback Exceptions section at the last meeting. This item has been noticed as a public hearing. If the ordinance is satisfactory, a motion to recommend approval to City Council is needed. Canty <FilestWPFiles\Projectstzoning amendmentsVes setback pe.wpd 4 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 26-206, 26-2071 26-208, 26-209, 26-210, 26-211, 26-212 AND 26 611 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO REQUIRED SETBACKS FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND EXCEPTIONS THERETO. A. Intent and Purpose: This district is established to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable low-density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature which are incompatible with the low-density residential character. B. Development Standards: Minimum Maximum Minimum minimum Front Minimum Minimum Maximum Building Lot Lot Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Height Coverage"' Area Widthlil Setback Setbackll'' Setback (W One-family dwelling 35' 30% 9,000 sf 75' 30' 10 , 6 1-1,11 15' Group home 35' 30% 9,000 sf 75' 30'(" 1 w6t. W 15* Detached garage or carport 20' 1,000 sf 9,000 sf 75' 30' (0) 5' 51 Private storage shed 20' (9) 400 sf 9,000 sf 75' 30' 5' (6) 5 fe) Churches, schools, government and quasi-government build- ings, golf courses 35' 30% 1 acre 200' 30'(0 150)(f) 20' All other uses 35' 30% 9,000 sf 75' 30'fc' 5 , ( d) 15' NAHREN • (a) Any side yard which abuts a public street shall have a minimum setback ♦ thirty (30) feet for all GED\530271384393,01 Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum Front Minimum Minimum Maximum Building Lot Lot Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Height Coverage IN Area Width Setback Setbacli Setback IbI 35' 40% 7,500 sf 60 30'tc) fi!td) 10, 35' 40% 7,500 sf 60 30"c) midi 10, 20' 600 sf 7,500 sf 60' 30' ( ct 5' 5' 20* (91 400 sf 7,500 sf 60' 30' 5• ( G ) 5' 10) 35' 40% 1 acre 200' 30"i) 15' 20' 35' 40% 9,000 sf 60' 30'(c 5 -W 10, (a) Any side yard which abuts a public street shall have a minimum setback ♦ thirty (30) feet for all GED\530271384393,01 Section • Wheat Ridge Code • Laws, Section 26-209 Residential-Two District (R-2) is hereby amended to read as follows: GED\53027138439M1 3 B, Development Standards: Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum Front Minimum Minimum Maximum Building Lot Lot Yard Side Yard Hear Yard Height Coverage IN Area Width Setback Setback "' Setbacks'' One - family dwelling 35' 40% 9,000 sf 75"il 30 -(` pfd! 10 , Two- family dwelling 35' 40% 12,500 100' 30' fj ( d ) 10' sf Croup home 35' 40% 9,000 sf 75' 30'(°) 5±(di , 1 0 , Detached garage or carport 20' 1.000 sf 9,000 sf 75' 30 "e 5' S' per unit Private storage shed 20' 400 sf 9,000 sf 75' 30' cedar 5 , W Churches, schools, government and quasi - government build- ings, golf courses 35' 40 1 acre 200' 30' 15 0)( ' ) 20' All other uses 35' 40% 9,000 sf 75' 30" 5 10, (a) Any side yard which abuts a public street shall have a minimum setback of thirty (30) feet for all structures. (b) Any rear yard which abuts a public street shall have a minimum setback of thirty (30) feet for all structures: (c) Front setbacks for structures on lots or portions of lots which abut cul -de -sacs may be reduced to ten (101 feet for those portions of lots which abut a cul -de -sac bulb. (See Figure 26- 123.3.) (d) FOR ONE STORY, A total of fifteen 0 5) feet side yard setback for every individual lot with a minimum of five () feet on one (1) side. FOR TWO STORIES, 10 FEET. FOR THREE STORIES, 15 FEET. (e) Any building or structure which houses animals, except a residence, shall be set back fifteen (15) feet. (f) Fifteen -foot setback for the first story and five (5) feet for each additional story; (g) Poultry houses and pigeon coops are limited to a maximum height of twelve 02) feet. (h) Minimum twenty -five percent (25%) landscaping required on site. (See section 26 -502,) (i) Minimum ten (10) feet of landscaping is required within the front and side yard setbacks adjacent to public streets. (See section 26 -502.) (j) Corner lots shall have a minimum lot width of eighty (80) feet for both street frontages. Section 5. Wheat Ridge Code of laws, Section 26 -210 Residential -Two A District (R -2A) is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 25 -210 Residential -Two A district (R -2A). X Intent and Purpose. This district is established to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable medium - density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any stature which are incompatible With the medium- density residential character. B. Development Standards. Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum Front Minimum Minimum Maximum Building Lot Lot Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Height Coverage'"' Area Width Setback Setback Setback'' One- family dwelling 35' 40% 7,500 sf 60 "k 30'(c) VS) 1 0, Two - family dwelling 35' 40% 9,000 sf 75 30' ti=ta 10 Multifamily (3/more dwelling 35' 40% 13,050 100' 30' fvl(a) 1014ir units) s ffd) Croup home 5' 40% 9,000 sf 75' 30' 6 , = fa) 10 Detached garage or carport 0' 600 sf 9,000 sf 75' 30'(c) 5 , 5 , (per unit) GED\53027i384393,01 4 0 Minimum Minimum Side Yard Rear Yard� SetbacO* Setback �bO� Section 6. Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Section 26-211 Residential-Three District (R-3) is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Intent and Purpose. This district is established to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable medium- to high-density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature which are incompatible with the medium- to high-density residential character. GED153027138439101 5 Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum Front Maximum Building Lot Lot Yard Height Coverage' Area Width Setback Minimum Minimum Side Yard Rear Yard� SetbacO* Setback �bO� Section 6. Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Section 26-211 Residential-Three District (R-3) is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Intent and Purpose. This district is established to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable medium- to high-density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature which are incompatible with the medium- to high-density residential character. GED153027138439101 5 B. Development Standards: Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum Front Minimum Minimum Maximum Building Lot Lot Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Height Coverage' Area Width Setback Setbac0l' Setback (f7} One- family dwelling 35' 40% 7,500 sf 60''' 30 5' 10' Two- family dwelling 35' 40 % 5,000 sf 75 30' (0 5' 10' Multifamily (3 or more dwelling 35' 40% 12,500 100' 30' 15 "a) 151,1-04-(a) units) sf (d) Group home 5' 40% 9,000 sf 75' 30 " 5' 10' Detached garage or carport 20' 600 sf 9,000 sf 75' 30 " 5' 5' per unit Private storage shed 20'f 400 sf/ 9,000 sf 75' 30' 5'(8) 5'(e) 4 d.u, Churches, schools, government 35' 40 % 1 acre 200' 30 "(h) 15'f th) 20' and quasi- government build- ings, golf courses, small day care center, and nursing, elderly and congregate care homes All other uses 35' 40% 7,500 sf 60' 6) 30 "' 5' 10" GED1530270384393.01 One-family dwelling 35' 40% 7,500 sf 60" 30` 5' 10 Two-family dwelling 35' 40% 9,000 sf 75" 30" 51 10, Multifamily (3 + dwelling units) 35' 400 12,500 100 30' 15" .15. W(W sf W Group home 35' 40% 9 sf 75' 30" 5' 10 Detached garage or carport 20' 600 sf 9,000 sf 75' 30"' 5' 5' per unit Private storage shed 20' 0) 400 sf/ 9,000 sf 75' 30' 5 '(6) 5'(8) 4 d.u. Churches, schools, government 35' 40% 1 acre 200' 30'" 1 5's )(h) 20' and quasi-government build- ings, golf courses, small day care center, and nursing, elderly and congregate care homes All other uses 35' 40% 9,000 sf 60" 30" 15" 10 (a) Side and rear yard setback shall be ten (10) feet for the first two stories and an additional five (5) feet for each additional story over two stories. (aa) Any side yard which abuts a public street shall have a minimum setback of thirty (30) feet for all structures, (b) Any rear yard which abuts a public street shall have a minimum setback of thirty (30) feet for all structures. (c) Front setbacks for one- or two-family dwelling structures on lots or portions of lots which abut cul-de- sacs may be reduced to ten (10) feet for those portions of lots which abut a cul-de-sac bulb. (See Figure 26-123.3.) (d) A minimum of three thousand nine hundred sixty (3,960) square feet of land area shall be required for each dwelling unit for multifamily buildings. (e) Any building or structure which houses animals, except a residence, shall be set back fifteen (15) feet. M Poultry houses and pigeon coops are limited to a maximum height of twelve (12) feet. (g) Minimum thirty percent (30%) landscaping required on site. (See section 26-502.) (h) Minimum ten (10) feet of landscaping is required within the front and side yard setbacks adjacent to public streets. (See section 26-502.) 0) Corner lots shall have a minimum lot width of eighty (80) feet for both street frontages. GEM53027138439101 1. P orches , patios decks and balconies. Porches patios decks and ba whic are , ■. ,.a le ast « two s may e in : front se , to eight f eet or into . side or ea z ■ ; maximum ■ one-third t - distance ., t c losestpr op e r t y „ line PROVIDED THE W OF YARD It NOT REDUCED TO LESS THAN FIVE (6) 4 Fire es open s A fir es or open stairway may e into any front i or z yard provided «- width of . . yard , .o red to l B IN COMMERC A AN I N D UST R I A L $ E D ISTRICTS, ENC ROACHMENTS a R EQUIRE D S ETBACK AREAS .p NOT B. PERMITTED EXCE AS FOLLO -■� . -•��e. ■ ©2 �� ;� »■ »<: •e�. ;.� �� e� » ». , . ,.. ,. . $_. . . _ e , . � K.e�� <l e- e� < - � �•• •• < »� ° » ». � ;• �� < �\ ,,. ■� � . » e ��. °. 2.# ■ - -� e � : » � e � f ° ■� � ©■ �� ■ � �� ■ - -.t� � - ■�e � e� <:a� �� -\ ., . >. ©, - -e. :,e •- ■ , :a -, e�. a ». of -r�- ��- ■� a °° ? R�<�e.��� � ffe�■ » ,» a ©° e� �'■ e�� ■ . ■ • � -� � t� « . ■� . � - ... . � f� :. +. e - e� ., :- w :• » .. ■ ;� e ±© -e,.� ■�$- - •- ,�■ - -$ . ■.# �, GEm5302 saw a9$ 01 S Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this day • -, 2001 SIGNED • the Mayor on this day of 2001. ATTEST: Gretchen Cerveny, Mayor Wanda Sang, City Clerk GED\53027\384393.01 9 r 1 ij gi ;IIIIII; I First Publication: Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: GED\53027\384393.01 1 0