Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/07/1998AGENDA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION May 7, 1998 Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on May 7,1998, at 7:30 p.m., 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER H 9 Approved S. w/conditions 6. M APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be recommended for placement on the agenda.) �ill oi Wnsm Mimi PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.) Approved A. Case No. WZ-98-6 (continued from April 2, 1998): Application by Ba tist w/conditions Home Association of the Rocky Mountains, Inc. for approval of an ameZment the Mountain Vista Retirement Village Planned Community Development (PC final development plan, with variances, for the construction of three duplex unit (6 independent living units) located at 4700 Tabor Street. I Approved w/ Y No. WZ-98-9: • application from Daniel J. Mahoney for approval to conditions rezone property located at 6185 West 38" Avenue from Residential -Three to Restricted-Commercial. Continued to C. !Case No. WZ-98-11: (CONTINUE TO JUNE 4,1998) An application from 44 June 4, 1998 Eldridge, LLC for approval of a Planned Industrial Development combined preliminary and fi ' nal development plan and plat for the purpose of developing an industrial park located at approximately 13500 W. 44' Avenue. 10. NEW BUSINESS C:\Barbara\PCRPTS\PLANGCOM\PCAGENDA\980507.wpd CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting April 16, 1998 1. CALL THE MEETING TO #• ► to order by ! ` 1 pm. on • Building, Commission Members • • • • The following is the official set of planning Commission minutes for the public hearing of April 16, 1918. A set of these minutes is retained both in the office of .the City Clergy: and in the Department of planning and Development of the City of Wheat 1idge, 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Planning Commission Page 1 04116198 The motion carried by a vote of 6-0, with Commissioners COLLINS and THEANDER absent. The minutes of the March 19, 1998, Wheat Ridge Planning Commission were presented for approval. approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried 5-0 with Commissioner THEANDEJ absent; and Commissioners GOKEY and SNOW abstaining. There was no one signed up to speak before the Commission. (Commissioner THEANDER arrived at 7:35 p.m.) 7. PUBLIC HEARING I 1111 , 11,11,11RIMEMM MIMI A. Case No. CUP-98-1: An application from Compass Montessori School for approval • a conditional use permit to allow use • property zoned Agricultural -One and located at 10351 West 44th Avenue as a playground area for a private school. the subject property in the future for the purpose of expanding the school and, at that time, another conditional use permit or zone change to Restricted Commercial One would be necessary. Following further discussion, the applicants appeared before the Commission. Diane Otten 101.01 th Street, Golden, CO Planning Commission Page 3 04/16/98 In response to a question from Commissioner SNOW, Ms. Otten replied that the property is owned by Compass Montessori, Inc., but the school is funded by Jefferson County, She also noted that they plan to enroll 150 children and that there is capacity for 180 children. Patricia Trapp 502 Parkview Court, Golden, CO Ms. Trapp described the construction of the playground stating that they do not plan to VW a chain I ink fence would be constructed between the playground and the Garramone residence. She informed that the playground must meet requirements set forth by the Department of Social Services and that she was agreeable to considering a single access from Miller Street into the school. Commissioner GOKEY expressed concern about the increase in traffic which would result from transporting 150-180 children to and from the school and asked if a traffic impact study had been completed. Bob Goebel replied that the traffic engineer had assessed the situation and felt it was advisable to close the access from 44th Avenue because of the heavy traffic Ms. Trapp informed that starting times would be staggered and that school parking exceeded Jefferson County school standards. She also noted that the parents and directors of the school are very concerned about traffic safety. • 7717ner Rf : if be. Ms. Trapp replied that, if they are able to purchase that additional property, the playground would be expanded and the house would become a part • the school. Commissioner GOKEY expressed concern that the School District is not accountable to the City as far as building permits, inspections, etc. are concerned. Chair THOMPSON asked why the school was requesting the conditiohal use permit instead of the Garramone's who presently own the land in question. Mr. McCartney explained that the applicants have a power of attorney from the Garramone's. Robert W. Ulrich 10251 West 44th Avenue 8-206 14"Inwolugg Planning Commission Page 4 04/16/98 homeowners who were concerned that they had not received notification of the February meeting, He stated that none of the homeowners were opposed to the playground. Nancy Degenhart Representing Helen Newdorp 10251 West 44th Avenue 8-104 Ms. Degenhart was sworn • Chair THOMPSON. She stated that she was representing her mother, Helen Newdorp, who was concerned about the use of the playground during times the school was not in operation. She stated that, after hearing testimony, she was satisfied that it would -, The motion passed by a vote of 6 to 1, with Commissioner GOKEY voting no; mid Commissioner THEANDER absent. Planning Commission Pan 5 04/16/98 - - • • in landscaping plan as well as the impact of the Tabor Amendment • revenue generated by the industrial park. Commissioner THOMPSON expressed concern about having only one fire access point, Mr. Orner explained that the Fire Department placed a stipulation on its approval of the single access to require all buildings to be equipped with fire sprinklers. Commissioner BRINKMAN expressed concern about communication towers being placed on the highest elevation of the property. Tom Hartley 2200i Golden Gate Canyon, Golden Mr. Hartley was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he was the applicant for the Planning Commission Page 6 04/16/98 annexation and rezoning. He informed that the property is planned to be developed as light industrial with the exception of a parcel in the northeastern portion of the property next to the access road which would be a possible retail site for a convenience store and gas station. Commissioner BRINKMAN requested that no firearms sales or gun ranges be allowed on the property. Mr. Hartley replied that those uses had never been considered for the property. Chair THOMPSON asked if there were any,individuals present who wished to address the Commission. There was no response. I. The annexation meets the state criteria for annexation eligibility. 2. The annexation will be a logical extension of the City's boundaries. 3. The annexation will allow the city to gain regulatory control of the development and usage of the subject property. With the following conditions- Planning Commission Page 7 04/16/98 I The City Council shall call an election to ask the voters to decide whether the City can keep additional revenues generated by development on the annexed property. MIZIUM 2. The annexation will be a logical extension of the City's boundaries. 3. The annexation will allow the City to gain regulatory control of the development and usage of the subject property. (Chair THOMPSON declared a recess at 10:30 p.m,. The meeting was reconvened at 10:40 P.M.) proposed zoning is consistent with the City's rezoning criteria. Planning Commission Page 8 04/16/98 3. There would be no significant negative impacts as a result of the zoning. 4. The zoning is consistent with the City's Three Mile Plan. I The list of permitted land uses shall be restricted to those contained in Exhibit B with the following corrections: E. Page 3 Parking: Item no. 2 would • amended to read as follows: "retail or wholesale areas, gas stations, motor vehicle repair facilities and similar uses, H. Page 6, item no. 6: The word "ration" would be corrected to read "ratio". Page 6: Item no. 7 would • amended to read: "All other turf shall be a blend • grasses native to this area." J. Page 6: Item no. 8 would be amended to read: "Other landscaping materials shall consist of native plant materials indigenous to the area, and native turf grasses." 2. The applicant/owner shall be solely responsible for all public improvements as listed in Exhibit C. Said improvements shall meet the approval of the City's Public Works Director. 3. All requirements of the City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public Works as listed herein shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works prior to the recording of any subsequent final plats, or prior to the issuance of any building permits. 77tirrussrivne IM71 IfituJIUMMI I T I I . I in Exhibit C" be omitted from Condition No. 2. The amendment was'accepted by Commissioner SNOW. Ivir. riart Icauon aoTti semi 7MMUT repair, sZan7gT77= park, by necessity, would require some maintenance of semi-tractor trailers involved with the businesses in the park. He reiterated that he did not want to have a truck-stop in the development. Commissioner SNOW requested the Planning Director to review the final motions to ascertain if Mr. Hartley's concerns are addressed and, if not, those concerns could be dealt with during the City Council hearing. 8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING H III 111 111111 111 11 1 1 • lffl 0 10, NEW BUSINESS A. Nuisance Issue - Chair THOMPSON stated that she has received complaints about the house on property located at 42nd and Xenon and requested that staff investigate to determine if this property can • addressed under the public nuisance ordinance. Commissioner SNOW asked why only R- I and R-2 zone districts were included. Mr. McCartney replied that this requirement could be changed. He stated that rr acernent • bus shelters was intended to increase bus rider ship, and that there is-a larger percentage of R- I and R-2 zone districts. Planning Commission Page 11, 04/16/98 Commissioner SHOCKLEY asked if a property owner could request a change in 3. That the shelters be placed in all zone districts; that in residential districts, they be restricted to properties where uses include chur6es; and remove R- I or vacant land. B. Planning and Zoning Division Projects: There was a consensus to reschedule this matter for the Planning Commission meeting of May 7, 1998. C. Body Art Regulations: There was a consensus to reschedule this matter • the Planning Commission meeting of May 7, 1998. Planning Commission Page 12 04/16/98 12. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS There were no committee or department reports, 13. ADJOURNMENT mm , to adjourn the meeting at 11:55 pm. .31= Janice Thompson, Chair Planning Commission Page 13 04/16/98 0 r TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 1998 DATE PREPARED: April 29, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ- 98.6 /Mountain Vista CASE MANAGER: M. R c ert ACTION REQUESTED: PCD Final Plan Amendment with Variance LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4700 Tabor Street NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): Mountain Vista Retirement Village 4800 Tabor Street NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): Baptist Home Assoc. Of the Rockies 5280 Vivian Street Arvada, CO 80002 APPROXIMATE AREA: 5.46 Acres PRESENT ZONING: Planned Commercial Development PRESENT LAND USE: Nursing Home, Independent Living SURROUNDING ZONING: N: I, S: A -1, : PID, W: PID SURROUNDING LAND USE: N, E,: Commercial, W: Commercial, Vacant, S: I -70 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: Industrial DATE PUBLISHED: March 13, 1998 DATE POSTED: March 1, 1998 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: March 9,1998 ENTER INTO RECORD: {) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE {) SLIDES {) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS {) OTHER JURISDICTION: The property Is within the City of Wheat Ridge and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. a -i This staff report has been modified to reflect a correction to the number of existing units within the development. This was due to an error on the existing final development submitted to staff showing the number of units at 31 rather than 41. The property in question was rezoned from PRD, A-2 and Industrial to Planned Commercial Development with an outline development plan and final development plan and plat approvals pursuant to Case Nos. WZ-87-4 and WZ-90-1 1. 7.1 ME 41 independent living units in place on the south side. An addition to west side of the nursing home structure was completed in 1993. The outline plan allowed for a total of 47 independent living units where only 41 were existing. The applicant is requesting approval of this request to add six additional units plus coverage of the existing parking spaces with carports and new parking. 111. AGENCY REFERRALS Valley Water District is working with the applicant to resolve service issues. Additional main line extensions with looping may be required with appropriate easements. Additional water service lines and tap fees will be required for the new units, Public Works has reviewed and approved an,amended drainage report. No public improvements will be required. The traffic division has no comments, Police Department has commented relative to crime prevention. Their comments have been forwarded to the applicant. The applicant is proposing a final development plan which allows for the construction of six independenf living units in three duplex buildings plus coverage of all open parking with carport TZ-99-6 Page 2 structures. Two of the duplex buildings would be located at the very southwest corner of the property with carport structures. These buildings will displace existing maintenance buildings. Setback variances are required for the carports and the eastern structure. The eastern building has been shifted northeast to reduce the amount of variance needed. Staff has calculated the number of parking spaces based on the following: 27 existing bedroom units x 1.25 spaces 34 spaces 14 existing 2 bedroom units x 1.5 spaces 21 spaces 6 new 2 bedroom units x 1.5 spaces .9 spaces TOTAL REQUIRED: 64 spaces The proposed construction will match existing architectural style and material currently used. If the i,rovosed amendment is a r. mved, buildinp--cxs=-.gkwW i 9*j ' W will be 28% and landscaped coverage will • 34%. These figures are consistent with the underlying outline development plan, V. VARIANCE CRITERIA WZ-98-6 Page 3 M variances of 15' and 24' are required. The applicant has submitted a written justification to support the request for variance included under Exhibit '13'. Staff would note that there is an existing structure with a non-conforming setback in this area which will be removed if the development plan amendment is approved, �1:�11 III 11 11111 1 1111111 iiiiiii 111111111111111111 111�11 1111piIIIIIIIrI 11�111111 111111 J i I n iiii 11 : 11 ii 1,1111111 -Ell A IL I is 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? If the variance is not granted, the propert)�can still be used for independent livin Alternate locations for the new units is limited because of severe slopes along th southwest, west and northwest property lines. There is an existing structure in th location with a non-conforming setback. 1 1 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? In 1987, the 1-70 frontage was realigned and reconstructed adjacent to Vista Village on the south and west sides. No additional right-of-way was obtained from Vista Village although there was a permanent slope easement dedicated to the City. This slope easement is located opposite of the intersection of Tabor Street with the frontage road. It is located to the west of the buildings where variances are needed. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? WZ-98-6 Page 4 4-1 There is somewhat of a hardship because of slopes on #t • available parking. The applicant building to the northwest possible. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? A precedent could be established for similar requests if no findings of hardship or unique circumstances are :made. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property The purpose of # build additional units and to provide cover"# parking. 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property hardship The self - imposed. # • not Granting of the variance would be not be detrimental to the public welfare as there is adeouate fire access and a substantial t t i i # i found 10. If it is !t ve that granting of the variation would not detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is i found that public ! surrounding ZVEM Page 5 a- The benefit of the new units is additional affordable housing for elderly persons in the area regardless of whether or not the variance is granted. To Staff s knowledge, approval of the variance would not result in an accommodation to persons with a disability PARKING Pursuant to Section IV. Of this report, 64 parking spaces are required were only 62 are provided. 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to ► used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? The property could still be utilized for independent senior living whether the parking variance for two spaces is approved. The applicant has indicated that the existing parking is underutilized because many of the residents do not have cars. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? because • slopes. However, there appears to be adequate room to enlarge the existing parking areas to accommodate two additional spaces 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? The slopes • the property could be considered hardship, however, there is ample room for the existing parking areas to • expanded. 5. Would - the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? If no hardship or unique circumstances are found, a precedent could be established for similar requests. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilitiesand surrounding property valueswould not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result ina reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? WZ-98-6 Page 7 14-7 11 1 1 A V �, I 1 11 1 v Now amendment have been met. For these reasons, a recommendation of approval is given with the following conditions: I . Additional guest parking spaces be pursued elsewhere on the site. 2. A pedestrian connection be made between the southern and northern portions of the site. VARIANCE - SETBACK Option A: "I move that the request for approval of a setback variance next right-of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be APPROVED for the following reasons: I A variance is required to allow construction on the property as shown on the development plan. 2. The topography of the site and the excess right-of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances." I . 2. 3. VARIANCE - PARKING Option A: "I move that the request for approval of a parking variance for property located at 4700 Tabor Street • DENIED for the following reasons: I. There is no hardship or unique circumstances. 2. There are alternatives available." WZ-98-6 Page 8 0-7 ' \ ,�, [. i � � � � �� -- �.�� : � I � \/ :/� /� � /�} ��: . � ��� ���� �� �.© � \» . � �■ m� \ � � \ \ \ � \ \�� �� a �� w. . : .� .� � »� 6 .\ . ..��� . � . . | \© ° �� ? °��\ �� �� .� . ��� $ ,� � �� � � � �« ` / \ } \� �� :\ � :,. ..���`` �� \ m \ � \.\ \ �� � � \. � \\ , .�.� .. .��\ � . , ®� � .. . � . � .x ; � �� \. ^� . . 2 \� 0 % � � � � .� � �� � \ � / �� \� ©�®�' : \� . » >/ . , . . - � ��. .^ \ � � � \� \\ \� � � . �< ». . ,��_�� . «\� ����� . ; ■ �2 y \� �f � \� � . � :�.���� �' ~ \/� ��2�. \ § ] ��\ � � <� . .�! >. � \������� .: �'�� �� �� ■. �� ���� ���� � . ,. k . . � �� ����^ � � \� »��. � � � � � \� \� \ \�� �. � / �� . � 4 . ',r5' BAPTIST HOME ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, INC. 5280 Vivian Street - Arvada, Colorado 80002-1923 * (303) 424-5589 Re: Request for variance for new construction at Vista Village Independent Living, 4700 Tabor Street, Wheat Ridge, CO IF I � I 1 11 1 1 1 � I IN i 1 1311111 11 1 11111 11 11 aml 11 10 0 ZEE= A is being demolished in the Village. This infringement has not been a problem in the past and I reasoned that the set back could remain the same — similar to a "grandfather clause" on previous construction. The proposed building is separated from the roadway by open space and a steep hillside. 3) 1 am concerned that moving the new structure further North or West from where planned will necessitate removal of several long standing trees, both soft and hardwood, The immediate area needs to retain as much of this established growth as possible; as # # o jamoening the noise level comine from the highway, MINI! Division of American Baptist Homes of the Midwest Eden Prairie, Minnesota Paget . I I i i llill- I IA ISSUMORNW411FAIIIII, lflmmlml ' 2� 1 1. REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a rezoning of property located at 6185 West 38th Avenue from Residential-Three to Restricted-Commercial. The purpose of the rezoning is for conversion of the building to a commercial use. The applicant/owner currently resides on the property. If the rezoning were approved, the structure would i1twill -,ial office or a live/work situation where the xwner resides on the tox floor and has his office in the basement. I or resia 717ning in accessory to the primary use as a residence. However, there area many restrictions such as no additional employees or signage allowed. If the property were redeveloped with the current zoning, four multi-family dwelling units would be allowed. The property is comprised of a one-story, single family structure approximately 1100 square feet in size. Access to the property is • way of a single curb cut from 38th Avenue. There is adequate must be paved. The property exceeds the minimum 10% minimum for landscaped coverage. An existing six foot high solid fence is in place along the rear property line. 11. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A meeting for neighborhood input was held on March 24, 1998. The following persons were in attendance: Meredith Reckert - City Staff Dan Mahoney - applicant Angela Cheer - 6165 West 38th Avenu4 33MM -Proposed use of the property -History of the area -The potential for multi-family units with the existing R-3 zoning -Uses allowed in the R-C and C- I zoning -Property values in the area -The area resident in attendance did not object to the rezoning as long no offensive uses were permitted such as liquor sales or adult entertainment Planning Commission Page 2 W,-98-09/Mationey "linnim"Nuffla Wheat Ridge Fire Protection district can serve the property. Wheat Ridge Public Works Department has no comments at this time. No additional public improvements will be required. Wheat Ridge Police Department can serve. 00322 Ir��� A contacted but not U.S. West Communications, TCI, Wheat Ridge Builaing Division I is defined as consisting of mainly service and convenience commercial development. The property is shown as Transitional Residential in the draft Comprehensive Plan proposed Future Land Use Map. Within the text of the proposed comp plan, this designation includes small retail uses and professional services with ancillary residences and live/work situations, Surrounding land use and zoning includes Restricted -Commercial on both the east and west with corresponding commercial uses. To the north is a multi-family development with R-3 zoning. This is the remaining property on the north side • West 38th Avenue between Harlan anM Pierce Street which has not been converted to commercial. 3. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There could be economic benefits from the rezoning based on an increase in property taxes. Planning Cointnission Page 3 W -93 -Q9 /Mahoney �✓ J Z-e" 4. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type • uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All responding agencies are already serving the property. f That the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to adjacent properties. and air to adjacent properties. Prior to paving, a grading permit will be required ensuring drainage problems are not created. There is adequate capacity in West 38th Avenue to accommodate future commercial land use. I I � I I M 01111=1 3ZMEZM=11'i � I MM= The property is currently being utilized as a residence. If the property were redeveloped into multi-family, a total of four units would be allowed. 7. That the zoning will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Commercial zoning abuts the property on two sides. Since the comprehensive plan supports the commercial use, spot zoning is not an issue. 8. That there is a void in an area or community need that the change of zone will fill by providing for necessary services, products or facilities especially appropriate at the location, considering available alternatives. Staff concludes that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan and adjacent land use • the east and west. Staff further concludes that there is existing solid fencing and landscaping along the northern property line for buffering for the adjacent residential property For these reasons, a recommendation of Approval is given for Case No. WZ-98-9 with the condition that the gravel driveway and parking area • paved. Planning Commission Page 4 WZ-98-09d Mahoney Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-9, a request for approval of a rezoning from Residential- Three to Restricted-Commercial for property located at 6185 West _38th Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: �j -5 � Al11Ml� NNIIII�1 N� � � � j�j . � MNNNNR i It s. • Now ter °`5 rfCov 4M. �p •s,✓ C: rr A } f G +� 4 ' t f —. /eAVr w \ _.. .« �� � ?n 3r d 1 V4 Of (A $ tvot& ti C,Z,4,PYIC SCAG e 1 eCfi " /7, e94 :F O• 9s.s m Q dT AEf dor rrdlP - x ,� xrry w ear 42e fGdj "9GJ!U 1 b' R?tC7 1 coo 1 se Core- exi $NFs S+ St✓ SeGtic� W , h,� 6:10. X ul VVMM i IJ. U—M g*� �+y �y dt S" 0 2 PI R OT AXZR TIT Xp.� ,. . e ..'°!wS^^^..,r.eTf v \w... +.+.mu•..r... +w ... . f d OWNER'S POLICY dw W01392- 02119/96 07:20 :40 Vn addition to the Exclusions, you are not insured against lose, costs, attorneys# fees, The City of GWheat ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION Department of Planning and Development GRidge 500 West 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 237-6944 Applicant Daniel J. Mahoney Address 6185 W. 38th Avenue Phone 425-0895 Daniel J. Mahoney Owner Kath rine D.,,=hanal Address 6185 W. �8th, Avenue Phone 425-2825 Location • "• •..8 W. 38th Avenue, Wheat Ric K Type • action requested (check one • more • the actions liste I d -- below which pertain to request.) ailed Description of request Chaj!&e from R-3 to RC. Properties on both sides List all persons and companies who hold an interest in the described real property, as owner, mortgagee, lessee, optionee, etc. 12HOUN5 .1 certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true an,,R I correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners m�iAt submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this actio 0 Signature • Applicant I'/ SEAL late Received .Me.. r.. ! ��U+M_� �# Vie. # �iil� My commission expires ze;� FROM: MEREDITH RECKERT, SENIOR PLANNER SUBJECT: - 1. PLANNING AND ZONING PROJECTS DATE: MAY 7,1998 NEWWWONOW To assist the Commis p sion with rioritization, a list has been attached showing staff s priority completion • the various projects. In addition, a calendar • Planning Commission meetings through the year has been attached. A few of the projects on the list are currently under revie as denoted by an asterisk. I Staff would like to point out, that while attempting to schedule these additional projects, that the Commission keep in mind the case applications being processed for the Commission's, City Council's, Board • Adjustment's • EDARCs review (approximately 45 case applications submitted to date). /bd CABarbara\PCRPTSNPR0JECTS.WPD 06 E- W w-, W rn r a.s cl C3 C? cn ua Cz Z 72 tn Vi M ! s l o - � r� 0 CO 0) A | { ./ 0 R - \ . '/ s Mr► r P- fi-� 40 CA m Co cr) cr) I I A- g 5@ E I dq C I A- g 5@ E I I I 7.1 • • I 0 od cu co % / w � /�. ( % . � .... .m �. ...� . . . . . .. . � . . . % / w � /�. ( % . � .... .m �. ...� 2 co 0) a) N RA