Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/16/1998CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting July 2, 1998 9 PM 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the June 18, 1998 Wheat Ridge Planning Commission were presented for approval. Planning Commission Page I C, 07/02/98 It was moved by Commissioner GOKEY and seconded by Commissioner SNOW that the minutes be approved as amended. The motion carried 5-0 xvith Commissioners DUNN and SHOCKLEY absent. G. PUBLIC FORUM • lli% III 161 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. WZ-98-11 (continued frorn June 4,1998): An application by 44 Eldridge, LLC for approval of a Planned Industrial Development combined preliminary and'final development plan and plat for the purpose of developing an industrial park located at approximately 13500 West 44th Avenue. Planning Commission Page 07/02/98 i Commissioner GOKEY stated that he would like to see a plan showing the Colorado Department of Transportation's (CDOT) road interfacing with the development road before making a decision. He also commented that studies have found that convenience stores and Planning Commission Page 4 07/02/98 ♦ mmissioner-BRINKMAN requested that wording Preliminary and Final Development * Preliminary and Final Plat be • to areas and Toni Hartley 22001 Golden Gate Canyon Rod Planning Commission 07102/98 Em P' Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that although she would not stipulate it as a condition, she was requesting that, should Lot 2 be developed as a retail area, the developer not allow huge light awnings to be constructed in order • restrict the lighting impact. Mr. Hartley replied that her point was well taken and commented that since no one has indicated an interest in this lot, there was a 50% chance that the retail development would not take place. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked for clarification • the date of the Fairmount Fire Protection District's letter contained in condition no. 4. Mr. Orner replied that the date of May 21 was correct, rather than April 16. Mr. Hartley requested that condition no. 3 include wording that the sprinkler system meet approval of the Fairmount Fire Protection district and NFPA standards. He also requested that condition no. 10 be amended to delete the requirement for parapet walls and to simply require screening. Chair THOMPSON suggested designing the entrance to the development in a manner whi would be similar to that of Mt. Olivet Cemetery. Mr. Hartley replied that he thought this was a good point and would look into it. Chair THOMPSON requested that if a service station/convenience store is built, that banners and outside displays be restricted. Planning Commission Page 6 07/02/98 Commissioner SNOW stated that she would like to see a final road plan before giving final approval. Commissioner GOKEY commented that he felt road design should • left to the engineers, designers and planners who are qualified to design and that the Commission can only make suggestions. Alan White stated that the road design has not been finalized and it would be appropriate for the Commission to include certain recommendations. Commissioner BRJNKMAN expressed concern regarding the consideration of the - preliminary and final development plan at the same time. There was discussion regarding the difference between preliminary and final development plans and preliminary and final plats. It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner COLLINS that Case No. WZ-98-1 1, "Preliminary and Final Development Plan for property known as the 44th Industrial Park, • recommended for APPROVAL to the Wheat Ridge City Council for Planning Commission Page 9 07/02/98 2. Approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plan will result in a final development substantially similar to other light industrial development in the City of Wheat Ridge, subject to the conditions which will be imposed on the Preliminary and Final Plat. The motion carried by a vote of 4-1, with Commissioner BRINKMAN voting opposed and Commissioners DUNN and SHOCKLEY absent. Approval of the Preliminary and Final Development Plan and Preliminary and Final Plat are subject to the following conditions: I All requirements • the City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public Works, including the drainage plan, shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public works and prior to the City Council hearing date for this case. 2. A four-foot wide continuous sidewalk along the entire length and on the north side • the interior roadway shall be incorporated into the Final Plat. t. The applicant shall dedicate an additional ten feet of continuous right-of-way adjacent to and on the south side of 44th Avenue,, to be shown on the Final Plat. 9. The applicant shall • responsible for all public improvements. Said improvements shall meet the approval of the City's Public Works Director. 14. Areas and tracts must be reconciled between the Final Development Plan and the Final Plat. Plannina Commission Page I I 07/02/98 15, Site development notes should d reflect the correct zone district, 16. Planning Staff shall request that the Wheat Ridge Parks and Recreation Commission review and submit written comments before City Council review. The motion carried by a vote of 4 to I with Commissioner BRINKMAN voting opposed and Commissioners DUNN and SHOCKLEY absent. The motion carried by a vote of 5-0, with Commissioners DUNN and SHOCKLEY absent. C. Cast No. ZOA-98-05: An application by the City • Wheat Ridge for an amendment to Section 26-5. Definitions. for the definitions of Net and maximum Density within the Zoning portion of the Code of Ordinances. it was move76y 511 an issioner 7VT'TTM7TTM No. ZOA-98-05 • continued to the July 16,1998 Planning Commission meeting and, further that Discussion Item "Cily Review of Schools" also be' continued to the July 16, 1998 Planning Commission meeting. 8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING I 1 1111 SOON ill Planning Commission Page 12 07/02/98 Planning Commission Page 13 07/02/98 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission' DATE OF MEETING: July 2, 1998 DATE PREPARED: June 12, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: MS -98 -4 ICilless n CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney ACTION QUESTED: Approval of tiro -lot minor subdivision LOCATION OF REQUEST: 12200 Nest 5 " Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): John Cillessen 13020 West 58 Avenue Arvada, CO 80002 PRESENT ZONING: Planned Industrial Development PRESENT LAND USE: Office l Warehouse SURROUNDING ZONING: N: Agricultural -Two and Arvada, S: Planned Industrial Development, E: Light Industrial and V4 : Light Industrial SURROUNDING LAND USE: N: Single- family and Office /Professional S: and W: Light Industrial (Jolly Ranchers) and E: Single- family Residential DATE PUBLISHED: June 12, 1998 DATE POSTED: June 18, 1998 ( ) OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this ease. 1. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot minor subdivision for an existing Industrial Development known as the Wheat Ridge Industrial . Center. The property is zoned Planned Industrial Development and is located at 12200 West 52n Avenue. 11. CASE HISTORA M The property in question was originally heard before the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission and City Council on May 8, 1975 as a request of a rezone, The property was approved to be rezoned from Agricultural-T and Light Industrial to a Planned Industrial Development, which concurrently permitted the development to be subdivided into two separate lots (shown on the original plat as Lots I and 2). - e al develo# • the ap%dicant is re • iA gsliprp the subdivisi o n of xwotvA _ L Lot 1. Therefore, the property located • the east portion • the Wheat Ridge Industrial Center will remain as Lot 2. The building on Lot 2 was built in January 1985. An administrative amendmentwas approved in 1997 to divide allowed buildable area on Lot I into two buildings. 111. AGENCY REFERRALS All outside service agencies can serve the property with improvements paid for at the developer's expense. Public Works Department requires dedicatory language for access easements and detention pond easements. The City of Arvada Traffic Engineering Department was concerned that this subdivision may affect t future realignment • Ridge Road and West 52 Because the development already exists, thl minor subdivision should not impact the realignment. All of the'bther public agencies stated that the minor subdivision would not impact any of the existing services. rl� 1 1 3 01 &V M WIM the wes; side of the developm I ent. The proposed plat wi I I create two parcels, Lot I A and I B. The applicaut intends to keep Lot IA. The existing building on Lot I A is 18,000 square feet and the building on LotIB is 9,000 square feet. Both buildings allow for office / warehouse use and provide adequate parking. 1. 2.'* 3. Planning Commission Page 3 MS -98 -4f illessen � 3 S E I I 19 c ,R OF R . A MNS No - 235-2t62 L:\DRAWINGS\PLANNING\GS\SE17 A S RECEPTIQN NO. F0399091 36.97 PGs v001 °002 230 RECORDED IN JEFFERSON COUN TY, COLORADO 4/14 16;25:19 I � �tp R Ne M • { W W i WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made this 11th dayof April 19 97, between WHFAt'RIDCE INDUSTRIAL CEENTE LTD., A COLOF LIMITED ?APTNE.RSEIP. of the 'County of JEFFERSON and State of Colorado, grantor.. and JOHN A. CILLESSE'N AND JANEIL Y. CILLESSEN W ARRANTY DEED (To Joint Tenants) fl S.A.C, Architrelart Sna.e GifbRf ta. firown. 7 - - rtct 'n N G- Z>! ' EL4)FR 4 CNT PL AIIJ Y A cave ro • q,f d[ lanY.i hW e w R N Nort w taam. 1 EGt NINE^ t x +r 9 .oneo N80d47' to 9 I tI0"E oo .o Nnr t O dna 4CY A'.3d t of ;old b1 q i3 .e« �..,. at 260,32 #sot; MRnco 50d25'00`w a dtstOrrea of 150,00 1RrtI ih «nco $80d42 ^O9'w *1 Lo pma.l o 21 mRnt purtsuant to iha wtf *ar RidgR Co I ( , { ... FoCS rS rf0� O d1 -ro.e« of /0,00 foot, dither $0425'00"w a distoeas of 265^05 toot; to...r of Laws S•etian 2t.q, Ail S80a41 "ORt W 4404" o 4404"4 Of 250.32 toot to tho Southwosf co,.a, of too East 1/2 sa94 1.0 f5' th ncs N0dMO E a di to cs of ti5 q8 Bsfk m the TRUE PO49T BEGINNING . ! Co . fx of Jrfterso. Stot of Co+o as oo fai.i.q 104,111 sauors t. «t.. i ToO.W 0h a non - *.4140.* oo m of da to ioprro* and grrsR a r tfios : O-A*Lot 1 r O.0j_s showh aM fka €ono on 0 «oaVapm t Plan amt 4 of wh t lzd-r, ft A. and 3oh.0 Y. C7tPSxasn # i0. 1.4.0dal Co. tor rotowad A... 2. 16 8t Of RoasPtion No. 01038574, 13020 W, 581. Avonuo i 0> Arvada. CO 80902 A PORP0RTE0 A008E55:. 12200 Wool 32^d Avonw. 20NING1 Piq hwitor%to n $*Alf Sa'GRY t`1;4daSCMYAa ' iii'` AREA: 100,113 Soaors Toot Ct€tYttari. q++t4s p4M4'CiwtRW9a' TNR abaea nit Umanf a1 . a4knawiYdgtd arfan mR this y San. CiiN ne SSOn, Owrt V 1 �. pad, Syt AM.e# �w►in.., 0«a t+st^ a I LETTER OF INTENT Stato af: .32..... At lot dovatopan of WHEAT MECE 7NOUSTRfAL CENTER pHASE 2, Mx 40mmi4slan +aptrRS „ #. Wilnoso my rtohd and f T I 0 Is our lntrnf to 110v14a a 0,440 of Oght mcluslrfal fit,106., otfkiot s t,y i at 12200 Woof $2.4 Aasnus In cahoot Potgo. Colo oda, s. ` °°” °. '. """"'" "°" "'"""` " — The 6044th# TB 0* eon*truot*0 of RANI - tacr bwck waits and aYeo o} •tot! bor -Ia14f lat -4C toctud ftmq *ooro -fioit wNwo.. and. 4 ??}} it ....`nod *#rodeo yor4o. Tho outtdi.gs ar• 0­49­d to tw Hatory Puaie at %W @ Y _ E i 1 +d ta.dM- ttnfahs4 Uh p to twafrr imifs in ans buhdmq. .,�!. t w u tAC7 tfp r'` .. Ths projRel conotst* At two siri0la story buildings tofoB.g 27,500 Lot 2 opuara €tat that can bs diaidsd into ts1aR, Oft "As. o »houoo, g w woRc r49* 52 enrssamims Associafss f P2 - '""' • p �� .�....... _ "''" T-^ i and itRhf ma.afocturinq, RFG u ft g ior w l St SuitR 220 t " � . - ` * ✓"' # ` { 602fawoad, CO $0111 s .. « ,..w- 4C} "'",,� ....... 4 ,,, "'(115 ,.r A NOTE 0 V t, I. Llgh shad€ not br 4irtt41od so as to Co.— of €sits gtarr. 1 I °•- ^,.:.,4.I f i + r � T C 2. 5oxvks yardt -had to RCrYYned with 6' high b att* taek w Ono 3 t pnra4Y - sdato, ( Chat. Nnt Nfi,# W ith p pork. andh U. T i �' 111 rs«am t,Tstsoo S.. Th- curb 9.141 sips elks foot os hots "'t". ]M rrPUMa - T prOvWrd by #hR 8wntr, Rn a44araaMO wftn Wtrlai Ridg♦ Th 400.4 at inifrwmtnf as fic.0o wagod 9,14,4 -* w r qdy .ttA: t997 ox_2%ei6t.A 4'- tl /"t,r" rry f 4. TpR 111011 �Y oven*, for tat 1 to }ah. A" and JONaii Y, r 7 2 Claosia., 13020 W. idlh A.snua. Whoot Rift^ Colorado Stave oh Cs un:y at: 0f.;uX f ?tCSCfaNTrs;'ft;4 80031' My commission aspttas l ' pp,0, Wifnrss MY hand 0.4 5, Too propsrly owns, tot tot 2 to whoof Rwit. S2 1n A.fman€ pft3aia! ss I ".44ldus, 8025 S. O.Atwc St, Suit* ?20, E094.004, CO tot I I. i --- ---- -" ( .. I 6, No 2a.* 3 of tho A-ado too. Profrcoim District, I m«ht paromRtatO far PnosR 1 Laf 2, appra 7, at 2anl.q: Plan.rd wthioviaf prvfktpm•nt, Nofory ublie I 6, All i1 v* p •Rd Po"o"At la $"it NO 82, Pa 4 21, Rot• hon 84 t 10346 5c75 40 KSVtE2 9 w y ,1f4+ ,1 RhoB romoM. r o eo4 MOS1mum awk1 ng hitiTfht Rhatt bR 25' •0 +G... RROOHod parkMg; Approv -d this 'ttoy 01 z'r i waves / 300 rq.tt. aftfe• . 6625 sa.ff. : 23 a A'nN2 fly .... -^°` , 800 oo.fL worRhavar q 20,62.5 *4.tt. 34 opaers -°^" • , v' I ProrMlad parting;. $7 spacifs ptus 3 himftoppa0. PIO..t.g cmd Er .mPm t r W 20057 _ •- -.- 1 e4worecs5 0 Ncuav d E tt: ^Mns:;af.+baw.t a:.f r *r t d a,'.+^arRr. '"WA* ta'i RUILDiW, AREA; 27.500 SO.FT', 25,22 I "i sa�b tab �, At*9r 0f&n irla LAMOSCAPE AREA; 21.443 SO,€T. 103% " SERVICE YARO AREA, Miloo SOFT, t4,8t LOT I AREA: Ic4,t13 SQ'M ton RUILDiW, AREA; 27.500 SO.FT', 25,22 pARKNN: AREA: 22.230 SO,FT^.2O.4K LAMOSCAPE AREA; 21.443 SO,€T. 103% " SERVICE YARO AREA, Miloo SOFT, t4,8t ORAft AREA: 22 «060 so.FT, 120,2x CASE HISTORY W2 -97- 2nd AMEND. "ENT w2 - - it) AMENDMLNT w2 -ta -aR w2 -74 -20 ORIGINAL RK ANAR(CORDCR'S.. STATE Of COLORADO } COUNTY OF JEFFERSON } I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ptakN WAS ftL.ED IN MY OFffccjL4.S,„yt O'CLOCK P.M,. ON THE ,LttADAY OF tno, 19 tom',,. AND 15 DULY RECORDED IN PLAN FILE . T'CE PAIDIo, Qttc7TgY7915a w�A4wo,. r '.'.ORDER E y w> BY, f �liN� 0 -iv i8isnC]Nl (118iVIHAA ....... .. . I# "C" —nu Are, II;! I #nsom aw #I #of 0 2,4 "Is to - X—, J- tit- AA 41 4nU "A ArU #I" $tU 31UWS4,4, I 40 ""o, "If-t . . .... 64 "oto 3 A0 $4 tz a �liN� 0 -iv i8isnC]Nl (118iVIHAA ....... .. . I# "C" J- tit- "If-t . . .... M . . 4 0 tt 0.1 .# 'A lru. 't-14 4--t .:t 1.1 A.j I— It :' U A4 ..I—w - In*-* -4— AA tit --It W.— %.tt I.. -It . 04"lloz, $4, UIAS - Kom"##*D* CIt tell "" 40 4114 CK4 ucef tit 140=1 uslix, Atu.4t (I %xx 1* 4 4411 lu 40 a3ul" I V.alf ju :7— ....... .. . J- tit- "If-t . . .... ..tit J. 4-6 .,-4 ....... ... ..... A-4-4 u ulutxx. A6 11 Attu �t— it -1 It t.w. 04twws 43 W .14 suz I YY' : %, —11 " — , , . ; We --tt it 1.1 f lrt . . . —: . ..... . . .. ... We om t.—C.t.—C I I" to 'Just" t CIt tell "" 40 4114 CK4 ucef tit 140=1 uslix, Atu.4t (I %xx 1* 4 4411 lu 40 a3ul" I V.alf ju :7— LAND 'o'6E Planning and Development Department dam West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone(303)235-2846 o Q Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request) M� ■M � - 6UtLr>1&J(:T OTJ 990PO56 D I b I CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: July 16, 1998 DATE PREPARED: July 9, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-98-12/ Emily CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney ACTION REQUESTED: Change of Zoning from R-2 to R-C, and an 18'6" front yard setback variance to the 50' front yard setback requirement. 64 West 44" Avenue Marcie Emily 9080 West 32 d Avenue Wheat RidgeC*,?_DAU Same • EM Two, Residential- 7:E: and W: Restricted-Commercial _Lyr� Church, and S: Single-family residential DATE PUBLISHED: June 26, 1998 DATE POSTED: July 2, 1998 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: June 23, 1998 XIRISDICTION: The xm%eaA is within the Ci'tr of Wheat Rid and all noti have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. .TarG SCIDaUK variance�N Ine5wr rom: yara setback requiremei for a property located at 641 West 44 Avenue, Approval of this request will allow for the continuation of an existing zone district (Restricted- Commercial) throughout a neighborhood that already consists ♦ small professional offices. The property in question is approximately 9,150 square feet in lot area, and fronts both West 44t Avenue (north) and Lamar Street (east), The applicant intends on using the existing 1,385 square foot structure as a small office building. The Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan delineates the area as Neighborhood Commercial land use, predominately for the parcels that abut West 44 Avenue. The character of the neighborhood is primarily office professional along West 44 Ih Avenue, many of which have been conversions of single family residences. A meeting for neighborhood input was held on May, 19,1998. The following persons were in attendance: Sean McCartney - City Staff Marcie Emily - applicant Michael Constanten - 4335 Lamar Street am Wheat Ridge Public Works Department has no comments at this time. No additional public improvements will be required. - am 77 T" Company, U.S. West Communications, TCI, Wheat Ridge Building Division Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a change in zoning (change of zoning conditions): That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, comprehensive land use plan and other related policies or plans for t area. I 3. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There could be economic benefits from the rezoning based on an increase in property taxes. 4. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. 5. That the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to adjacent properties. Because the only changes proposed for this property are in additional parking and landscaping, there should be no impact on the amount of light and air to adjacent properties. Prior to paving, a grading permit will be required ensuring drainage problems are not created. There is adequate capacity in West 44th Avenue to accommodate future commercial land use. 6. That the property cannot reasonably be developed under the existing zoning conditions. The structure on the site is currently unoccupied and the existing zoning is Residential-Two, Under the current zone district, and being that the property is only 9, 100 square feet in lot area, a single-family residence is the maximum use permitted on the site, 7. That the zoning will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent A r nearby areas. Restricted-Commercial zone districts are located on the north, east and west of the property. Lim Plan for this neighborhood. Therefore, spot zoning is not an issue, 8. That there is a void in an area or community need that the change of zone will rill by providing for necessary services, products or facilities especially appropriate at the location, considering available alternatives. It is impossible for staff to ascertain whether the rezoning will fill a necessary service, product or facility. Staff does believe that approval of this request will allow for the property to come into compliance with the use and design of the surrounding properties. 11 141C 1C.2-0111AS ! Truon or Inis case is approved, # lowing variance must be considered for the applicant to comply with the development standards established in the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 1. Can the property in question a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district fi in which it is located? No. Because the property was designed to accommodate a residential use, and the applicant is proposing to rezone to a commercial use, the front yard setback requirements will change, Therefore, if the variance request is denied, the applicant could not legally reuse the existing structure. C. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Yes. In the immediate neighborhood, there are other residentially zoned properties abutting West 44 Avenue that may request commercial rezonings in the future. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property Yes. The purpose of the variation is to allow the existing residential structure to remain on site and ♦ converted to a commercial building. Redevelopment of such a small site would not be cost efficient. 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? Yes. The applicant, who has interest in the property, has created the hardship in that she is hoping to reuse an existing structure. R. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? dirow low 1 � 0 f UNTUT1 wr)� an't MVISTIMICTIT proper line ksoutnlea � comer). Because of the proposed parking lot design, visiting automobiles will not have to bac out of the parking lot onto the public street and therefore will not pose a threat to the public's welfare. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. No. Because the applicant is not proposing any structural additions to the existing building, Yes. Approval of this variance will allow for the redesign of a site which is currently underdeveloped, thereby positively improving the immediate surroundings. Therefore, approv-1 of this variance should be a benefit and contribution to the neighborhood and community. Staff concludes that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan and adjacent land use on'the east and west. Staff further concludes that approval of this request would allow an upgrade in landscaping, paved surfaces and an ability to re-use an existing structure. kv Option A: "I move that Case NOWZ-98-12, a request for approval of a rezoning from Residential-Two to Restricted-Commercial for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Parcels to either side are zoned Restricted-Commercial. 5. Minimal impacts are anticipated with the rezoning. 6. Approval of this request will allow for a positive redevelopment • this property. MiTenual- 171 - M.&McfeaTommercial tor property locatect at 04 111 TT est 44th Avenue, bc DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. 11 There may not be any future additions to the front (north) of the existing structure." Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-12, a request for approval of a 186 front yard setback variance to the 50' front yard setback requirement for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: t . 2. 3. 11 eAp1anning\foms\report I 4 4 rz q yiN ap rr +"t AYE 11 IfUA f i z "71 A .s ?a , h! ^� F. Y h� �. ♦ yQt. � . S RI w�. "� � T +t .«,et � � � ��' t 11 f Im e RI -- J�t*l�n ial 11I 1 1 M a lIF 6 l+� x r* r=m�mm 1� n� 0� n f r � f r Y1 .S I 4 4 rz q yiN ap rr +"t AYE 11 IfUA f i z "71 A .s ?a , h! ^� F. Y h� �. ♦ yQt. � . S RI w�. "� � T +t .«,et � � � ��' t 11 f Im e RI -- J�t*l�n ial 11I 1 1 M a lIF 6 l+� x r* r=m�mm mwwxiwla THS PROPERTY IS NOT OF A FLOOD HAZARD AREA MAP 085079/0005-C DATED 2-4 -88 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FLOWLINE IN RIGHT OF WAY LOT 23 14385 - LOT 2 NOTE: COVERED CONCRETE PATIO ENCROACHES 14TO 6' EASEMENT BY 4* +/- AS SHOWN. 5 . 122.2' WIDE P.S. C& EASEMENT PER RECEPTION' NO. 87087084 ............... ....... ......... + a . 30* BUILDING SMACK LINE PER REC. PLAT v Ld Ld LOT 1 R LPLZT FOUND #4 PIN-/ I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FLOWLWE IN RIGHT OF WAY 47.6' 9 #641U 1 - STORY BRICK ;P 1 RESIDENCE MORTGA<3E LOAN SURVEYORS 3531 SOUTH LOGAN STREET. SUITE D - 197 ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO 8010 789-2763 (FAX) 789-2782 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6410 WEST 44TH. AVENUE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PER CLIENT SCALE: LOT 1. KEITH SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. 1' 20* WEST 44TH. AVENUE (60- RIGHT OF WAY) mwwxiwla THS PROPERTY IS NOT OF A FLOOD HAZARD AREA MAP 085079/0005-C DATED 2-4 -88 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FLOWLINE IN RIGHT OF WAY LOT 23 14385 - LOT 2 NOTE: COVERED CONCRETE PATIO ENCROACHES 14TO 6' EASEMENT BY 4* +/- AS SHOWN. 5 . 122.2' WIDE P.S. C& EASEMENT PER RECEPTION' NO. 87087084 ............... ....... ......... + a . 30* BUILDING SMACK LINE PER REC. PLAT v Ld Ld LOT 1 R LPLZT FOUND #4 PIN-/ I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FLOWLWE IN RIGHT OF WAY 47.6' 9 #641U 1 - STORY BRICK ;P 1 RESIDENCE FLOWLWE IN RIGHT OF WAY 47.6' 9 #641U 1 - STORY BRICK ;P 1 RESIDENCE Rear (kd at Wckwk M- Rec 'To. PERSONAL REPRESENTSFIVE'S DEED ('l;:statc Estale) TI IIS DEED is made Is ------ Yenae,th—J----Cra-Lg— as Personal Representative or the Estate of ltty deceased, Grantor, to Grantee, whose legal address is Lot 1, Keith Subdivisio County of Jefferson, State • Colorado. i also known by street and number as 6410 W. 44th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. With all appurtenances, subject to covenants, casements and restrictions of record, and subject to general property taxes for the year 19 and subject to covenants, utility easements, liens and tax assessments of record. As used herein, the singular includes the plural and the plural the singular. Executed ' 19 98 ­ R`ennet�i. C�rag Personal Representative of the Estate of i I Allen Green 1 1, ii - - - lierNA. Green , Deceased STATE OF COLORADO s COUNTY OF ) M46. Rex, 11-92. Bradford Publishing, 043 %,tt %., Dmmr, C090202-0030924500-12-92 copyright M 6-111 'Em 6A gg /\ mf ON -�, j o m I � � � \� LAMAR STR19T .�« � /} : �f y � � ■� �� § I The City of ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION GWheat Department of Planning and Development GRidge ♦• West 29th wr •i Phone i *4 TO: - Planning Commission FROM: Alan White, Planning and Development Director ow I I - 67-w" owl BACKGROUND Over the past year the Planning Commission has discussed the issue and definition of density The Commission requested that staff create these definitions for inclusion into the Zoning Ordinance definitions section. Net Density: Net Density is the number • dwelling unitsallowed on an area of land excluding all streets and roads', whether public or private, to their full platted, dedicated • reserved width ' for circulation for the traveling public within • through the development. The calculation for net density shall exclude those areas used as driveways and access to parking areas. Maximum Density: Maximum density shall not exceed the stated number. This per acre maximum is not a guarantee and shall only apply if all site development standards and rezoning evaluation criteria are adhered to. The future land use map for resid- s r within this plan designates a range • densities. There is no absolute right to C ,► Why .d • • tmaximum'density" needs to be created and included in the Zoning Ordinance is not clear. The Code does not use density as a development standard for the various zone districts. Minimum lot size and lot width are used to control the size • lots and, ultimately, tensity. Staff recommends that this issue be tabledindefinitely and discussed as part of the upcoming Comprehensive Plan meetings with City Council. Ultimately, staff recommends that the ,;iensities of the land use categories in the Comprehensive Plan be defined as net densities and that a definition of net density • included also. The "maximum density" definition noted above should become an additional policy in the land use chapter. The definition of net density can be included in the Zoning Ordinance, but it has limited applicability. In summary, the Montessori School is a public school and we have the right only of review and comment on any plans for school construction, GORSUCH ATTORNEYS AT LAW IMMUNIUMM Re: City Jurisdiction for School Building Reviews M C You h'ave asked whether the Compass Montessorl School is subject to land use review and approval (or denial) authority by the City. I understand that this question was posed by the Planning Commission. This letter is in response to that request. The relevant statute is Section 22-32-124, C.R.S., which provides, in pertinent part, as follows: ffllffoffllz�� M Alan White Planning and Development Director June 16, 1998 Page 2 division of labor. Nothing in this subsection (1) shall be construed to limit the authority of a board of education to finally determine the location of public schools within the district and erect necessary buildings and structures. (emphasis added). Our research has confirmed that the use of the term "public schools," within the statute, extends to and does include charter schools such as the Compass Montessori School. See C.R.S. § 22-30.5-104, which provides in part: 22-30.5-104 Charter School — Requirements Authority I hope this information is helpful to you. If it raises questions, please advise. a= M� « TO: Planning Commission FROM: flan White, Planning and Development Director SUBJECT:, 1999 Planning and Development Department Budget E-1 City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development, Department Memorandum - Completion of the Comprehensive Plan was not included in the goals because this was felt to be an ongoing task. Consider a Geographic Information System (G.I.S.) for use by all City Departments and the general public. MIN • pl ant 4. Create a pamphlet explaining what the Department does, the responsibilities of the various divisions in the Department, and the responsibilities and duties of the various boards and commissions that work with the Department. 5. Continue the following existing Code programs: A. Weed inspection and enforcement, with the creation of an information campaign prior to start-up next year. B. Annual Clean Up Program. � -a 8. Prepare an economic development/redevelopment plan for the Wadsworth Corridor. 9. Consider staff realignment. 10. Enhance Code Enforcement Activities. Prepare Specific Area Plan for the northwest part of the City. 12. Prepare the following economic development/redevelopment plans: A. Kipling/1-70 Area and explore the possibility of using urban renewal in this area. B. 38th Avenue (Sheridan to Wadsworth) C. 44th Avenue (Sheridan • Wadsworth) 13. Explore creating an incentive program to assist small businesses in upgrading buildings, landscaping, parking areas, etc. 14. Prepare a Targeted Industries Strategy/Plan to identify the types of businesses to attract to Wheat Ridge. 15. Explore means to clean up or redevelop problem land uses: A. Truck Stop B. Southwest comer of 1-70/Wadsworth (truck driving school along south frontage road)