HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/03/1998AGENDA
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
September 3, 1998
Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning
Commission on September 3, 1998, at 7:30 p.m., 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be
recommended for placement on the agenda.)
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - August 20, 1998
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on
the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.)
7. PUJBI,IC HEARING
Denied A. Case No. W7-98-13: An application by The Chesrown Automotive Group for approval of
a Planned Commercial Development amended Outline Development Plan and a Planned
Commercial Development combined Preliminary and Final Development Plan. Said
property is zoned PCD and located at 3601 Wadsworth Boulevard.
8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
9. OLD BUSINESS
10. NEW BUSINESS
It. DISCUSSION ITEMS
12. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS
13. ADJOURNMENT to September 10, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
C':",Bzirbara'41("Ril'I'S\Ill-AN(iC'0\4\1)(,,'A(.,iENDA\980903.wpd
Minutes of Meeting
August 20, 1998
1, CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chair
THOMPSON at 7:30 p.m. on August 20,1998, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal
Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
2. ROLL CALL:
Commission Members Absent:
Jim Dunn (Excused)
Dean Gokey (Excused)
Staff Members Present: Alan White, Planning Director
Scan McCartney, Planner
Martin Orner, Economic Development Specialist
Ann Lazzeri, Minutes Specialist
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The following is the official set of Planning, Commission minutes for the public hearing of August 20,
1998, A set of these minutes is retained both in the office of the City Clerk and in the Department of
Planning and Development of the City of Wheat Ridge.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner COLLINS that the
agenda be approved as amended.
Planning Commission Page 1
08/20/98
The motion passed by a vote of 7-0, with Commissioners DUNK, GOKEY and SHOCKLEY
absent.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner BRINKMAN moved and Commissioner MacDOUGALL moved to approve the
minutes as presented.
The motion passed by a vote of 7-0, with Commissioners DUNN, GOKEY and SHOCKLEY
absent.
6. PUBLIC FORUM
There was no one signed up to speak before the Commission.
7. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Case No. WZ-98-14: An application by Marcie Emily for approval of a zone change from R-
2 to RC- I to allow professional office or service uses. Said property is located at 6410 West
44th Avenue. (Previously heard as Case No. WZ-98-12.)
This case was presented by Sean McCartney. He reviewed the staff report and presented slides
and overheads of the subject property. He entered copies of the comprehensive plan, zoning
ordinance, case file, packet materials and exhibits into the record which were accepted by chair
THOMPSON.
He reviewed the history of the case, stating that this case was previously heard as Case No.
'AIZ-98-12 and, at that time, the applicant was requesting rezoning from R-2 to R-C. After the
public hearing, the Commission decided that RC zoning was not restrictive enough and
requested the case be brought back to the Commission with a request for RC- I zoning. He
stated that a neighborhood meeting was held on August 5, 1998.
Mr. McCartney requested for the record that two additional criteria be included at this time
since they were not listed in the staff report. These criteria are as follow:
1. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning neaps of
t!P
the City of Wheat Ridge is in error.
In this case, the official zoning maps are correct and the property is zoned R-2 and is
surrounded by C- 1, RC- I and RC properties, Therefore, this request is not to correct
zoning maps.
Planning Commission Pap 2
08/20/98
2. A chance in the character in the area has occurred due to the installation of public
L*f
facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration or development
transitions.
Property in question is located on the southwest corner of West 44th Avenue and Lamar
Mr. McCartney concluded his presentation by stating that it was staff's recommendation that
the application be approved with conditions as contained in the staff report.
(Commissioner SHOCKLEY arrived at 8:00 p.m,)
Mr. White reviewed the uses allowed under the RC -1 zone district.
Marcie Emily
9080 West 32nd Avenue
Ms. Emily, the applicant, was sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. Ms. Emily stated that she had
nothing to add to Mr. McCartney's presentation.
Commissioner SNOW asked the applicant if it were her intent to expand the use of the property
to retail use now or in the future. Ms. Emily replied that she was thinking about adding an
z'
insurance business or similar business that would not generate a lot of traffic since the site does
not contain much parking.
Richard Hall
4375 Lamar Street
Mr. Hall was sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he was in favor of the
application which would allow improvements to the property thereby enhancing surrounding
property values, and would be compatible with the rest of the businesses on 44th Avenue.
Plannim. Commission Page 3
08/20/98
Commissioner SNOW asked if Mr. White could envision this property being used for retail.
Mr. White replied that he could possibly see something like an antique store, but certainly
nothing like a convenience store.
Chair THOMPSON asked if there were other individuals present who wished to address this
issue. There was no response.
It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner BRINKMAN that
Case No. WZ-98-14, a request for approval of a rezoning from Residential-Two to Restricted
Commercial-One for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue, be recommended to the City
Council for APPROVAL for the following reasons:
With the following conditions:
The motion carried by a vote
• 5-0 with Commissioner SHOCKLEY abstaining and
Commissioners DUNN and GOKEY absent.
Commissioner SNOW asked if the applicant was charged for the new application. Mr. White
informed the Commission that Ms. Emily was not charged for this application.
B. Case No. WZ-98-15: An application by Bolle, Inc., for approval of an amendment to Pacifica
Development Properties 11, LLC, PID Final Development Plan with a setback variance to allow
Plannim Commission Page 4
08/20/98
an additional freeway- oriented, freestanding; sign with a 7-foot setback, Afire property is zoned
PID and located at 9500 West 49th Avenue.
This case was presented by Martin Omer, lie reviewed the staff report and presented slides and
overheads of the subject property. He entered the comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, case
file, packet materials, slides and exhibits into the record which were accepted by Chair
THOMPSON.
Mr. Omer stated that the staff report indicated that the square footage of the sign face is 150
square feet when, in fact, the actual size is 1 -7 square feet. He also referred to a letter of
concern from the City of Arvada (contained in the staff report), and informed the Commission
that after the letter was received, the City of Arvada verbally requested that their letter be
withdrawn.
In conclusion, he stated that it was staff's recommendation for the application to be approved
with conditions as outlined in the staff report,
Commissioner SNOW expressed concern about the 45-foot height of the proposed sign and
asked if there would be a retail business associated with Bolle's facility as the sign code
prohibits signs over 25 feet unless retail is involved. Mr. Omer replied that the applicant would
In
address this issue.
Commissioner COLLINS asked about the maximum sign criteria for the Pacifica development.
Mr. White replied that there is a maximum of 400 square feet for the entire development. The
proposed sign would leave 75 square feet for any additional businesses in the development
1,
should Bolle's request be approved.
Commissioner BRINKMAN asked what would happen to the existing light pole which
provides light for the entryway should the application be approved, Mr. Omer replied that the
applicant would address that question.
Chair TFIOMPSON expressed concern about visual impacts which would be placed upon the
adjacent apartment units. She was concerned that the sign would shine directly into the
windows of those apartments.
Mr. Orner stated that notices were sent to the owner of the apartments and there was no
response. He noted that no negative response had been received in response to any notices sent
out regarding this application.
Planning Commission Page 5
1 1
08/20/98
Mr. White also pointed out that, if this were not a PID, the zoning code would allow a 50-foot
tall sign and, therefore, did not believe there would be a concerti with setting a precedent.
Commissioner MacDOUGALL asked if all the buildings in the development were Occupied.
Mr. Omer replied that the applicant plans to address this question.
Mr. Omer stated for the record that he believes Bolle is an exceptional new arrival to the City
of Wheat Ridge in that it is a well recognized international company, and the suggested
condition that provides the sign to be removed should Bolle vacate the development, provides
some protection to the city.
Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if they planned to maintain the landscaping around the sign.
Mr. Reed replied that their company represents a premier product and they have no intention of
letting the property look unmaintained.
BRINKMAN asked about the existing light pole. Mr. Reed showed the drawing of the
proposed sign to the Commission pointing out that the light will be mounted oil one of the
poles of the new sign.
Chair THOMPSON asked if the sign could be less than 45 feet in height. Mr. Reed stated that
this is the minimum height needed to gain visibility from west-bound 1-70.
Commissioner BRINKMAN asked that, if the sign is approved, were there plans to have the
Bolle name on the existing monument sign on the west end of the development. Mr. Reed
replied that they did not plan to place their name on the sign. He also advised that the colors
for the sign have been finally determined to be black and white.
Commissioner SHOCKLEY asked if they planned to add any additional signs such as "retail
facility on location" to the proposed sign. Mr. Reed replied that there would be no additions to
W
the sign as proposed.
,Jim Liley
2930 West Ninth Avenue, Denver
, , vlr. Liley was sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he has been with the Gordon
He also noted that notices of the sign application were sent to 156 property owners in the area
and lie only received one call from a person who did not object to the sign. He also noted that
the sign would not be visible to residents to the north.
Commissioner SNOW expressed concern about the height of the sign.
Luanne Williams
7305 Grandview, Arvada
Ms. Williams was sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. She stated that she represented the
Northwest Metro Chamber of Commerce and expressed support of the application. She stated
that Bolle was also considering locating in the Coors Technology Center in Jefferson county,
but chose the Pacifica location specifically because of the 1-70 frontage.
Mr. White advised the Commission that a separate motion would be required for the variance
and would require a super-majority vote.
Planning Commission Page 7
08/20/98
Commissioner SNOW commented that she would like to ensure the retail space lease is signed
before the sign could be erected.
Z:�
The applicant appeared before the Commission.
Ken Darcy
9500 West 49th Avenue
Mr. Darcy was sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he was vice president and
general manager of Buller
Chair THOMPSON asked Mr. Darcy to address Commissioner SNOW's comment. Mr. Darcy
•
Ime ferr
unless the company receives approval for the sign. He expressed concern about entering the
company into $600,000 debt without the signage necessary to operate from that building.
Mr. Reed and Mr. Darcy also pointed out to the Commission that Bolle is a service business
and that the 45-foot sign Would therefore meet Code requirements for a service or retail
oriented business.
Commissioner SNOW offered the following amendment: That the requirements of Section 26-
410 E(l) be satisfied prior erection of the sign.
The amendment was acceptable to Commissioner BRINKMAN and Commissioner
SHOCKLEY.
is III
an anti-araffiti sealant.
Should the applicant for this case, being Bolle Sunglasses, vacate their administrative
offices and future retail operation occurring on this site, the subject sign and associated
poles or supports will be completely removed from the premises and that the existing
light be restored.
Commissioner SNOW commented that she does not agree that the sign should have to be
removed upon Bolle's vacation of the property, because any business moving into that space
would also need a visible sign.
Chair THOMPSON expressed concern that all tenants are treated equally.
Following further discussion, Commissioner BRINKMAN amended condition no. 3 ) to read as
I
follows:
"Should the applicant for this case, being Bolle Sunglasses, vacate their administrative offices
and future retail operation occurring on this site, the sign would remain and be available to
future tenants with the same restrictions to other future users."
The motion passed by a vote of 6-0, with Commissioners D and GOKEY absent.
(Chair THOMPSON declared a recess at 9.35 p,m, The meeting was reconvened at 9:45 p,m.)
Chair THOMPSON declared the public hearing portion of the meeting closed.
9. OLD BUSINESS
A. Mr. White stated that he discussed the school site selection and construction issue with
planning directors of the County who were quite familiar with the problems and shared
the same frustrations as the City of Wheat Ridge.
10. NEW BUSINESS
A. Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that since she Would be unable to attend next
Thursday's meeting, she would provide written comments and concerns to be
distributed at the meeting for consideration.
B. Mr. White announced that a public hearing regarding mass rezoning will be held on
September 15, 1998. The Planning Commission hearing will be held October 22, 1998,
C. Mr. White suggested holding a 6:00 p.m, dinner meeting on October 1, 1998 for the
Planning Commission and the City Attorney to address various planning issues such as
Planning Commission Page 9
08/20/98
split zoning, etc. It was a consensus of the Commission to hold the meeting if a
sufficient number of Commission members would be present.
D. Mr. White announced that the September 17, 1998 Planning Commission meeting has
been canceled due to a conflict with the State Planning Conference which will be held
in Estes Park on that date.
1l. .A DISCUSSION ITEMS
There were no discussion items.
12. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS
There were no committee or department reports.
13. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner SHOCKLEY to
adjourn the meeting at 10:08 p.m.
Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary
Janice Thompson, Chair
PlanninIg Commission Page 10
08/201/98
' *-T OTE: PLEASE BRING YOUR MAPS
FROM THE PREVIOUS
NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): Same as above.
APPROXIMATE AREA: 10.75 acres entire site; 1.74 acres parking lot
PRESENT ZONING: Planned Commercial District (PCD)
PRESENT LAND USE: Vacant; temporary employee/customer parking lot
SURROUNDING ZONING: N: Residential Three and Commercial One; E: Residential Three
and Residential Two; S: Restricted Commercial One, Residential
Two and Residential Three; W: Residential Three and PRD.
SURROUNDING LAND USE: N: Multi-Family Residential and Automobile dealership; E:
Commercial, Multi-Family and Vacant; S: Duplex and Multi-
Family; W. Multi-Family.
DATE POSTED: August 20, 1998
DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: August 13, 1998
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE SLIDEM
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met,
t�
therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
M
I. REQUEST
ievei art IT Me entire site, an* appr*varM a
combined Preliminary and Final Development Plan for the employee/customer parking lot on the
northeast corner of the property.
11. — CASE HISTORY
M
Ralph Hanna
Walt Schreibrnan
Elvera Coogan
Angeline Garramone
Deanna Leino
IV. AGENCY REFERRALS
The following agencies responded to the referral:
Planning Commission Page 3
WZ-98-13/Chesrown
Jefferson County Planning - No comments,
a -q
The functional classification of Wadsworth has changed to Major Regional Arterial. It is one of
the few north-south roadways in the metro region that has continuity through the region.
Adjacent jurisdictions have recognized Wadsworth as a major retail corridor and have done
stuNies for improvements or have made improvements. Wheat Ridge has invested considerable
resources in the corridor by hiring a consultant to prepare a plan for the future Wadsworth.
3. In addition to #2, that the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into
conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and
policies, comprehensive land use plan and other related policies or plans for the area.
The existing adopted Comprehensive Plan shows the property as Commercial on approximately
the northern half of the property and Medium Density Residential on the southern half. The
Outline Development Plan would not be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan because
of the residential designation, but the Preliminary/Final Development Plan for the parking lot
would be in conformance with the commercial designation.
Both the adopted and draft plan seek to minimize impacts • commercial development on
adjacent residential uses. Providing an on site parking lot for employees and customers alleviates
the parking impacts on Yukon Court residents.
Planning Commission Page 5
WZ-98-13/Chesrown
4» That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will
be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived.
5. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community
derived by the change of zone.
setbacks With the ! • and the addition of ! to the site, adequate light and air to
adjacent properties should not be affected. The parking lot will not affect the public health or
or create drainage problems, Further drainage details and a traffic study needed
assess impacts of development of the remainder of
Planning Coinmission Page: 6
W -9 - 131Chesrown
9. -- That the zoning will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or
nearby areas.
MZUJM=
10. That there is a void in an area or community need that the change of zone will fill by
providing for necessary services, products or facilities especially appropriate at the
location, considering available alternatives.
This is not possible to ascertain. It may be that future commercial development will fill a void in
services of the nearby neighborhoods.
The amended Outline Development Plan and Preliminary/Final Development Plan are needed to allow
parking on the site as currently exists. Providing parking at this location solves a problem created when
employees parked on Yukon Court due to the limited spaces on the dealership lot.
The arnended Outline Development Plan proposes the same use restrictions, landscape buffers, access
points, building square footage, and maximum paved area as, the original plan. One acre of wetlands has
been added to the site, as well as provisions for pedestrian connections.
M
Staff is also concerned about the possible future uses on the property, The Outline Development Plan
contains a Section on Allowable Uses, The language should be amended to reflect the date of the
current Code, as amended, in referencing the uses allowed in the Commercial-One district. This will
eliminate confusion in the future by not referring to a 24 year old code.
Permitting non-revenue generating uses in commercial districts has been a concern in recent rezoning
and related decisions. The following uses should be added to the list of uses not permitted: Public and
private schools, and churches.
VIL RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
Outline DeveloDment Plan:
Option A. "I move that Case No. WZ-98-13, a request for approval of an amended Outline
Development Plan be APPROVED for the following reasons:
Planning C=tnissioti Page 8
WZ-98-131Chesrown
With the following conditions:
I A traffic study will be required at the time of Preliminary Development Plan submittal for
the southern portion of the site.
2. The landowner shall
• responsible for all future improvements to Wadsworth Boulevard
and 35th Avenue, including accel/decel lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalk, and signals as
required at the tirne of approval of the traffic study, Improvement shall • completed at
the time of development of the southern portion of the site.
Construction
• the wetlands and detention pond shall address the recharge of wells
located on the east side of Wadsworth and must be completed as required by the
stipulation agreement.
Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-98- 1 3 ), a request for approval of an amended Outlirl
Development Plan be APPROVED for the following reasons
I The amended Outline Development Plan is consistent with Draft Comprehensive Plan.
2. The amended Outline Development Plan resolves a parking problem on Yukon Court.
3. The development standards meet or exceed those of the Commercial-One zone district.
4. The anticipated impacts from the amended Outline Development Plan are no greater than
with the currently approved plan.
A traffic study will be required at the time of Preliminary Development Plan submittal for
the southern portion of the site.
2. The landowner shall be responsible for all future improvements to Wadsworth Boulevard
and 35th Avenue, including accel/decel lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalk, and signals as
required at the time of approval of the traffic study. Improvement shall be completed at
the time of development of the southern portion of the site.
Planning Commission Page 9
WZ-98-13/Chesrown
M
3. Construction of the wetlands and detention pond shall address the recharge of wells
located on the east side of Wadsworth and must be completed as required by the
stipulation agreement.
4. The Outline Development Plan shall be modified to show the boundaries of the existing
parking lot and be labeled as Restricted Use Area, with a modification to general note #4
which states: Customer and employee parking for the adjacent auto dealership and service
operation is permitted in this area."
S. The following uses shall be added to the list of uses not allowed on the first sheet of the
Outline Development Plan:
A. Auto service and repair and maintenance shops
B. Public and private schools
C. Churches
D. Automobile and light duty truck sales and rentals
Option C: I move that Case No. WZ- 98-13, be DENIED for the following reasons:
1.
Prehminarvffinal DeveloDment Plan:
Option A: I move that Case No. WZ-98-13, a request for approval of a combined Preliminary and Fin
Development Plan, for the 1,74-acre site located at 3601 Wadsworth be APPROVED for the following
reasons: I
11= 111111 ;IJ I IIIIIIIIIII pl�11111 1111i,
� • my
III IMM0=0 :
11 •
With the following condition:
1. Twenty-one shrubs will be added to the landscape plan to meet Code requirements."
Plannin * g Commission Pa 10
WZ-98-13/Chesrown
M
CABarbara =PGRPTS\WZ95.1 r.WPD
Planning Commission Page 1 1
W -98 -1 alChesrown
'HE)
0 - MW
m
ew"tr
f tatfre 40111
6I*a lobos
A Wbfrt I. Anderson Truster
I.. N- Wrikit Trustee
0txt 104pfr
thttgrt tiM '"JFx eloOrral tt,�
902. CAST EASIER PLACE
StArt 109
ENG "Eff000. co. #Otto
f XOt40d
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A tract of land located in the El of the NEb of the Nwts of Section 26,
Township I South. Aonq* 61 t+ett a the 6th P.N.. being o+or* particularly
dose I1t 4 4* follow"
C-O W,EXCING ar the North Qu *sttt torn df **44 Section;
ththca $00'0 "a
along in* North- South rant *,line of said Section,
a distance of 524.00 toot;
S 0 g ISt 44'1 a 41stonce of 45.00 test to the we *ttrly right -of -way
ilne Wf Wadsworth Bout *war4 which is the TPt'E PowT of St6*ne f;G
thtnc* continuing along said 4e.critied court * .A at to ct of 615.00
feet;
thence $00.02'I4'W par*llel to the East. line of the NE4 of the NA of
*aid 5ectton. a distance of to2.11 lost:
thence N ;4')6')5 "E 2.11 teats
th*or* S44xS6'IS't a 41 *tanca of 15.00 feet to the Northt *st corner
of * tract of land described in omet 2:",4 at pawl* 60 of the .:ott4raf*t aunty tons) thence s0x11'45'W part *ll*l to the fast line 0 in* B *n(l N tracts
* oast ant* of )45.64 fast to in* 401th line of We 15th AvfnusI
A - tb *nte SOVS6'I5'E par *11.1 to the South 11n0 of *ai4 Nt.4 of th* Nwrs
a 4Aat Anco of SI i.IT trot to West Ilr.e of w *d4worth BOuleward;
thane* . 00 . 01 " along *Aid asst lino * distant* of 614.5! (eet;
t.h *nca No) ")I')4't *long as t4 We st line. * 4t stance of 165.40 teat to
the T04t PGINT or WINNING.
Mu
th *i J* t ,sf trio , Iboast 9ht^,. f +'. tr it t*t +r0rthhts t. the - tuart tt of
iKtfOn 84. 'mhntnip I cot n.. sf'te s) .•wt :* X'. 6tn Pr; +crawl w xr.If *h,
fovhir Pf :tf ffrt4n. State of ',9 �G "'NO. :,t * °) "S r't 0trlft #11 lfwtr s:td
is f ,i
;,,w:
f, at the *41th oht•^l• >srirr ¢31.,11 if tt +4 '.ett 25, the -to
Arst *10" the .0 It" of 8* '.tat �'S. ♦ 4 +wt *ri(e it 530.70 feet;
thaws S'10 `W *W oar 41 tfI x+t4 • . - t '!44t I!++! of Iht - 0 3 .
jw1fr of %.. 441;ton 2A, * 4 +wt whet If l O. II ttft is tee wowthfswt.
Corner of ♦'£AT si ; 1A t *0 't`* ,.e s.y+ht 3f xtq.h +h); taint#
t7t'16`lS't 4 4l it snc* if ?A) 4.+*t: INW_* 5x9 36'l5`£; t +. st ;hie of
1 5,,k1 tf.t to ant norlht4St t'rhr1 ;f ; «1 I t N Trio ; ".1)
.: t .f -tf w
.t it t *1 Wftn t iota {fft ",t wt'3 +tr: °..f 3"M! 1 +art a of
9, 9E1 t.ft: inan Ya6'S+1'TI - 'a « * F 4i i"+{t Pt 01.42 ftfl: tnthtif
LWIV 11 * 1, a 41,11 at Pf 2P.. I9 '..I, ^+:rf ar If-, to tht Tr,* 00"t of
Ifgih+.,hI- foht *fhtq 7It tx,s.. ... t,
u
*'utline Development P`
f,tAAaft£s 0I st ;wail +£f£tfPWtiT
Xntt vt.a' €0h* *t t* t.,#Nclt, to #,*.to* a n1t414 't +MrROrhtw4 •tta•t tP*-
Mf1Cf41 t"ter fh3 wh411 to otsil.ed to bit -$ e,th *h4 t' *s• t , srt".
tettaral th4r Ktt1 ,4f tae n * fe.00rhoo4. *€Caws. ffndit W *'} + a % !.r-
out s hill :t 611 s'•yt4 to o,o,+44 .#.f €onft* Witty 4 4 t.1
tot the .wt's of '.hf stte an4 toe nt,;too, "9
f+ntwhfw tn411 5f t'+ *it fh to^enn w s*4t foe *r o Kt* of thts t; a 4 A w A RCt
ifhvllt, r+rl,dt br+C*. ?eto -0.d blot*. etas +of Ww4s 1'A 41aws. a
wnst4 :t
000t4 3r saaf -flst.
'h* a ehfttt4,.rf $ - *it to ,.111+44 axtr tot thtfrt sift. t tr
w l++gl4 ,hterwo +o *^d :e111CPwh1 01 by 4 if,- of 40 a•4tts :1 a , :ft•
turn £ohtrot to.r+Itaf w-O.1d hwttfolt :weewot0 of 44Tc.td. t .e ,to
of oil 141111( *Pe th4 toaaon 4rets milt be 0r0.teeo by 4 vw .f*s
lot
Awf Atson.
Att"aaftf 4StS
Tht sw6lect olootetr ;tit be Stxtloold to t;+th a fawn +ye+ 41 to
rot *f{ w *Its % Ke. all its otrottted un40f the ttrs*errfal• +rt
trftt Of tae Cftf 3d "atN4t 48d.f* talors4o. as it the : *te it a..qutt 1.
Igtt. t +#{ Sa 0t1*iil M. fee f9110hfnq Ww *A whtil tot SS tt lo`Wld
a,
Soft €twrkas
0. attt aaf s4s
r. sous* -1 40 ltr. •4 NO.*. D04t Ahd t -0 .0 tr4 +Ter 14;41
4.. TA.Ofr fords
t. 1 * *"I notels " *Whit
f, noa* for the +led An4 nwrslhq howtt
q, tot a41hes
olvitO*•+f Sfntltftt
It is 4ht10O4te4 t *at tonwtrettson Wfit *t. (tvItt 44 k+th+h ft.4 J44rt
fro* Ihf 4wte of 014th 400,0.4 #. Phtlinq of ant 0r01ttt .0t se .3e
At too t'*e of the POP,
6f*tt*t 4£514101045
I. Nast.t*F 0.C11" tottragt
= Ntntwa oils sn4 lst tot - to tonfor* to ant ON4ttq ft* ""or^.ts of 1-4
Cit of '" 14to
1. Min +two 1~40e4 0". toot* . fat
4. 4uildih1 setbKis • to be 60414sttd it the t'** of t f:l. *•
S. W4A iww* butldtnq htsgnt. • IS' *.trot fdr P1004s *4 I419rft+.* Clot*
tower Whit% aria #I not t.tttd $0
6. st -Pratt • to tonft_ to the wtgn 144* of t -f C alf of .eft 2;o
f
VICINITY MAP
Sl4ft Of ICtt*W 1S5
f 04+.'. p ,Eftta;twt
hAn,4'S wCal.f ;fat£
f i.t trst.:fitn6 iw51*t*4ot WAS a <4 wfA.atfEUO ffiftpot "4 E;+tS �a„. Csx pt
Ato tiff if Eat St At. •I.l AJa aa.ls A.
.w.M.Ut� - la RawAt *,x.
*x hAao
or CC*s•t it*f tat SACS
!f
C - 1
APPROVALS
A,4u:w6 f�+ €St;t+ff Cta t;f ;fart
at,% 10044xt:! t« ' i
' e,
S, f '-t C1 .f td +T t:a:t .
fff
t1k At a :,.6I oil ice f9 (i*afatllt ow'E}*w6al
}
hAn,4'S wCal.f ;fat£
.. :s TS `0 * la t,t x '.At ' -t �t'f } .CAT at2G£« tfa.•• a '*+' '* r ;'s
:`s :W.14 of) ;A' V J,4R •._
..
x.t hfl n,n At +N
C�� C " i _ ..
41.17
-1
fat a4 afk04t C0s0to`5 ftotifif Alt
, NOTES
e *# * Y *# w # ..........
ea f "# i # *.+ R.# • . tR t R. ew "r sr
Outl
wi #* t R e f•wY# R # Y rw 1# r # +aRl.rr * «# e
#, i Mlfwfe Y.f e.t sYt •a.R. #r *R, # * rtt ^*# #t
... ...
.......... ♦ 1• ## • * *! *w# rtt! #a# M #..eeif fP4R to ,
e *!yY#e i# r #e #wR HRfwt #Mil+wMi Y # f.RR #X #; r.i f* *t! #* . t *w # *rlfa# # *. {# # #1 Sa r••t f rt +. * +t. rr ## t ** ,
yam, ,,..��##''��+��
to Rr.MPw #Rr / re tHN#f l.. ��'.�' �� +�
# !* iwi #tN 1' M .rY. !t t!e xR "Y# k " #.*.t. an *, 4 * *LRt. #• #f ## .# . #LR �� 1+
Wh ea t
AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PI AN OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
SHEEP I OF 2
2'Z
• et s >
one R -3 fY a t f , .,,., . Zone PRD
� 4 - � • landscapetButier and 10' Cedar Fenc# - - --
F7
VICINITY MAP
Of
I
I
a
• i
� • RP n" 4
�E CASE - 'ROCESSI 'G APPLICATIO
Planning Development D epartment
750 West 29th kvenue. Wheat Ridge. CO
r
- m " •. 4 ♦ • ! , �. � • • � ! * +r .fit . � • ..• � � .. � e • • {# '. •
�G
FT
0
1
.
*
_4 U
o
as
-g
e
0
t*j
cz
` `'
�.
C - 1
73
>
tt)
+
0 cs
0
cA
�
r
0
C:
CZ
2
�
in >
—,:I
cz Ca
S"�
v 9
X
0
c3
G7
0
a
cz
""
'
;�
.�
� C,>
�
•, cam �
�
=,�
E
s
a
'
C/) :.
t t
t
c
cra
0
-
a
"
i
c^i 0
G
•
W
CZ CZ
>
,
e a
x?
VI
V
0 c r
ca
C>
�.j
c*t xrt
Z
0 U
z
v
?
ira
C
c�
cr•t
� ,
crt
>, ca
E5
N
C14
,
N
w
U
wp
ci
y
y
ci
�G
A- 0 - LO
N
i
N
$T
3
• ft.
v
a ,
it
C4 cs
r4 ri
C1 !»
U °
7—
o
cc
cn
cn
cc .cam
A- 0 - LO
N
i
N
$T
3
• ft.
v
a ,
C4 cs
r4 ri
C1 !»
U °
7—
AM
.
A- 0 - LO
N
i
N
$T
3
• ft.