Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/15/2004CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting December 18, 2003 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission was called to order by Chair McNAMEE at 702 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2. ROLL CALL Commission Members Present: Staff Members Present: 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Alan White, Community Development Director W Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant Following is the official set of Planning Commission minutes for the public hearing of December 18, 2003. A set of these minutes is retained both in the of of the City Clerk and in the Community Development Department of the City of Wheat Ridge, 4. APPROVE ORDER OF AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner WEISZ and seconded by Commissioner WITT to approve the agenda as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 5. APPROVE MINUTES — December 4, 2003 It was moved by Commissioner McMILLIN and seconded by Commissioner WESLEY to approve the minutes of December 4,2003 as presented. The motion passed with Commissioners WEISZ and WITT abstaining. f ¢, I Commissioner McMILLIN suggested that language be added to clarify that if an RV is parked on the side, but a portion of it extends into the front yard, it would be counted as an RV parked in the front yard. language be added regarding boat trailers because, while a boat trailer would not exceed the 6- foot limitation, adding a boat would most likely exceed that 6-foot limit. Alan White commented that this would come under the exempt status. In response to a question from Commissioner McMILLIN, Alan White estimated that variance fees would fall between $200 and $500. Commissioner McMILLIN then suggested that variance fees be forgiven for a certain period of time to allow citizens to apply for a variance without charge. Commissioner WESLEY asked if there are height limitations for boats. Alan White explained that height limitations presently apply only to structures. Chair McNAMEE invited public comment at this time. Tom Gillen 3250 Nelson St. Mr. Gillen was sworn in by Chair McNAMEE. He thought the ordinance was a good compromise. He thanked Alan White and staff for their work on the issue. Planning Commission Page 2 December 18, 2003 Vanessa Moreno 6671 W. 26th Ave. Ms. Moreno was sworn in by Chair McNAMEE. She commented about the proposed setbacks. In her case, the increased setback would actually make her trailer more visible. IWAN 11'r14 i N Commissioner PLUMMER agreed that horse trailers should be, eliminated from the ordinance and suggested that a waiver of variance fees be allowed for a period of up to two years. He further commented that the Commission should act upon the ordinance at this time. It was moved by Commissioner PLUMMER and seconded by Commissioner WEISZ to recommend approval of an ordinance amending Section 26-621 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws pertaining to parking in residential areas with an amendment to allow a waiver of variance fees for a period of two years after the ordinance is adopted and that horse trailers be eliminated. The amendments were accepted by Commissioners PLUMMER and WEISZ. The moti passed 5-1 with Commissioner WESLEY voting no. I 8. OLD BUSINESS Commissioner McMILLIN asked about the status of an earlier request for staff to investigate a lighting code based on objective measurements. Alan replied that this request was taken to Council and they also requested staff to pursue the matter. Commissioners PLUMMER and McMILLIN volunteered to prepare a report based on their research Alan White advised the Commission that the next Planning Commission meeting falls on January 1, 2004 (New Year's Day). It was moved by Commissioner PLUMMER and seconded by Commissioner WEISZ that the January 1, 2004 Planning Commission meeting be canceled. The motion passed unanimously. 10. COMMISSION REPORTS There were no commission reports. P - tanning Commission Page 4 December 18, 2003 0 In COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS There were no committee and department reports. ADJOURNMENT #1 #1 # Marian McNamee, Chair Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary Planning Commission Page 5 December 18, 2003 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Alan White, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Case No. WPA 04-01, Comprehensive Plan Amendments W DATE: January 8, 2004 Attached are two proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. One amendment extends the planning area outside the city boundaries and the other is a revision to Chapter 7. The addendum serves as a supplement to the City's Comprehensive Plan, The adopted Plan does not identify areas of potential development outside the City's boundaries, The 2001 Plan contains a general discussion of areas of potential annexation, but does not illustrate the areas on any maps or recommend any future uses in these general areas. This addendum is being proposed for several reasons. Prior to any annexation, C.R.S. 31-12-105 requires that a municipality have in place a plan for the area, including proposed land uses, Such plan may extend up to three miles from the municipality's boundary. Chapter 7 is proposed to be replaced in its entirety with the new Chapter. The new Chapter more directly speaks to Metro Vision and regional cooperation. Suggested Motion: "I move to approve Resolution INTRODUCTION This document serves as a supplement to the City's Comprehensive Plan adopted by City Council on October 25, 1999. Amendments were considered and adopted on January 24, 20M This Comprehensive Plan addendum addresses the potential urban growth area to the west of the City. The area subject to this addendum is illustrated on Map 1. The addendum meets the requirements of C.R.S. 31-12-105. I -4 * , m -4A 0Q.11 e* Fw- lb�2 rm la� EM Ilk Boundary Area Map I cr Ilk Boundary Area Map I LAND USE U33MMUC= Existing land uses in the urban growth area are vaded. To the northwest are areas of low to medium density residential development and commercial development along Ward Road, E3m3m•�� Few natural hazard areas are present in the planning area. The Clear Creek 100- a 500-year floodplains generally parallel SH58 in the center • the planning ar *ther natural hazards exist in the area. MMM9= Because the urban urban growth area is currently unincorporated, Jefferson County has jurisdiction over planning and zoning matters. The urban growth area lies within two subareas the County has identified for planning purposes. The North Plains Plan covers that portion • the urban growth area north of Clear Creek and the Central Plains Plan covers the area to the south • Clear Creek. Iq The Future Land Use map reflects the recommended land uses for the area as shown in the County subarea plans. The recommended land uses were matched as closely as possible to the land use categories contained in the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan. Future land uses for the planning area are shown • the Future Land Use Map • the following page, The Plan establishes the following recommended land uses- cU co 72 M C) w ---------- 4 , M Y 1 V71, Single Family 6 DLJs/AC Business Park Future Land Use Map it TRANSPORTATION network The existing street « major of .. .o -• and Youngfield on border on the western border. East-west connectors are W. 52 Avenue at the north, W. 44 Avenue, W. 32 Avenue, 1 20 th Avenue to the south. Trails currently exist along Clear Creek from to Golden, along 52 • Avenue west of Ward Road, and along 32 Avenue from 1-70 west to Maple Grove Park, « i will continue to serve the dual roles of providing access to the area a i carrying regional !�N6 ,Z4 :�� 1% 83 =14 � � 2 !�N6 ,Z4 :�� 1% 83 =14 COMMUNITY SERVICES revqwi I WFUI special districts Jefferson County currently provides general governmental services and law enforcement. Portions of the area are included in the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. • Fairmount • Arvada • West Metr*. * North Table Mountain W& S * Valley Water * Fruitdale Sanitation 9 Northwest Lakewood Sanitation mg =# frew W-11f f r area is not currenny servea Sy a water or sanitation district. The City will provide general governmental services and police protection for any areas annexed by the City. Fire protection will continue to be provided by existing districts currently providing services. Water and sanitation services will continue to be provided by districts currently providing services within their respective boundaries. Within the area currently not served by water or sanitation districts, there are three options to consider: Formation of a new water and sanitation district, or metropolitan district, with provision of services by the new district. Formation of a new water and sanitation district, or metropolitan district, with provision of services by another district or districts by contract with the new district. Wheat Ri P14, (This Replaces the current Chapter 7 in its entirety.) CHAPTER 7: REGIONAL PLANNING AND COOPERATION The Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) adopted the Metro on 2020 in 1995. It is currently being updated and expanded to the year 2030. The Plan emphasizes local control over growth and development decisions, but also establishes a framework within which to make decisions that affect the entire metro area. The plan establishes six core elements: 1 . Extent of Urban Development — will occur within 700 square miles by 2020, accommodating the expected population growth and adding 165 square miles to the existing area. The conversion of land should prevent the unnecessary extension • infrastructure, reduce regional vehicle travel, maintain air quality standards, and help preserve open space. 3. Free-Standing Communities — Boulder, Brighton, Castle Rock and Longmont to be separate from the urban area, with an adequate employment/housing balance and internal transportation system. These communities should retain their visual and physical separation and strive to meet the employment, service and facility needs of their new residents. F& is to provide mobility and accessibility to support the physical, social and economic development of the region. Metro Vision promotes an efficient transportation system by increasing capacity through public transit, system management, and providing for alternative modes in addition to roadway widening. Metro Vision recognizes the fundamental link between land use, growth and development patterns, transportation, and environmental quality, and that # #^ 7 Each core element provides a natural focus for addressing a wide variety of issues. While they are broad in scope, each has a set of policy objectives that more fully describe how they provide for growth while striving to protect the regional qualities residents value. While not faced with the challenges of rapid growth, Wheat Ridge is faced with many of the issues identified in Metro Vision 2020. Revitalizing commercial areas, maintaining stable neighborhoods and enhancing transit service all can be guided by the principles of Metro Vision 2020. I(Immitwi tilt K01 krol UN 3-'1 TI 511 ff-= Ii N �U_l W Ff_- "1,Z=YT9= to the year 2030. It currently does not overlap with the urban growth boundary/area • any other jurisdiction. The Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan supports many • the core elements • Metro Vision 2020, including designating a specified area for urban development; creating a balanced multi-m►dal transportation system; participating in a regional open space system; and incorporating public participation processes into all planning efforts. Goals and Policies • Encourage Mutually Beneficial Region Cooperation i FE of life, to protect the environment and to promote the economic vitality of the communes wn the Denver Metropolitan Region. 2. Goal: Annex and grow in a manner consistent with the goals an policies of the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan. i 3. Goal: Coordinate and cooperate with other agencies in the provision of infrastructure and services to City residents. MI um " I ME= lipill IIIIIIII I III" 11111 gg CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Series of 2004 WHEREAS, C.R.S. 31-23-206 (2) provides that the Comprehensive Plan may be amended • the City from time to time; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan did not include any areas outside the corporate limits of the City as is permitted under state enabling legislation, at WHEREAS, prior to annexation, a city must have in place a plan for the area considered for annexation pursuant to C.R.S. 31-12-105, and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission this 15th day of January, 2004: 1. The Comprehensive Plan amendments attached hereto as Exhibit A are recommended for approval to the City Council. NM Secretary to the Commission CA um and SeWnes\k'ath)1\Loca1 SettingsVremporary Internet Files\OLK54Wp amendment pc res Ldoc