The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/01/2005I AGENDA, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION December 1, 2005 Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on December 1, 2005, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS 4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be recommended for placement on the agenda.) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — October 6, 2005 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.) 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. LLA-05-03: An application filed by Gino & Michelle Quintana for approval of a lot line adjustment at the properties located at 3295 Cody Street and 8605 W. 32nd Place. T I . Case No. WA-05-19: An application filed by Gino & Michelle Quintana for approval of a variance to minimum lot size for an existing duplex on property zon Residential-Two (R-2), located at 8605 W. 32nd Place. I 10. COMMISSION REPORTS 11. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS 12. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting October 6, 2005 CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission was called to order by Chair McMillin at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 91000M�� • 6. PUBLIC FORUM There was no one present to address the Commission during this portion of the meeting. Planning Commission Page I October 6, 2005 B. Case No. WS-05-02 (continued from 9-15-ft�h An application filed by IBC Holdings for approval ♦ a 17-lot major subdivision plat • property presently known as 5060 Ward Road. Due to their absence at the prior hearing of these cases, Commissioners WESLEY and SCEZNEY stated that they had thoroughly reviewed all material from the September 15 and October 6, 200 meeting packets and were prepared to make fair and impartial decisions in the cases. Commissioner PLUMMER stated that he believed office warehouse use should be allowed in this type of development. Commissioner CHILVERS questioned staff s recommendation that no outside storage be allowed. Mr. Crane replied that staff is concerned that outside storage does not mesh with the location of a future light rail transit station in this area. He asked that if Planning Commission felt outdoor storage is appropriate, the motion should contain conditions to screen the storage and that storage not exceed the height of the screening. nd street between 50 and 52 , Mr. Crane stated that this was discussed with the applicant who was not amenable to having such a road intersect their development. Planning Commission Page 2 October 6, 2005 Commissioner McMILLIN expressed concern that in light • the heavy traffic already existing nd on Ward Road that a north south connection would be necessary between 50' and 52 especially if the light rail transit station is built. In response to a question from Commissioner WESLEY, Alan White stated that RTD has a -'Q-r-UM Ve -Iagcrfmii� practices (zoning, pedestrian connections, etc.) adjacent to transit stations. In response to another question from Commissioner WESLEY, Mr. Crane explained that the staff and applicant have agreed that vocational and training schools uses should be fully contained within the buildings and shown • the final development plan. Commissioner McMILLIN commented that there is some disadvantage in making a decision without input from RTD. Mr. Crane commented that he understood RTD would begin an environmental impact statement in February. the city ability to pursue zoning violations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Planning Commission Page 3 October 6, 2005 In regard to • earlier question from the Commission, Mr. Gunter explained that landscape materials will be provided on each lot; however, the majority of landscaping will be provided on the outskirts of the development to address the community. He stated there is no intention to have solid pavement in the interior of the development. In response to a question from Commissioner McMILLIN, Mr. Mott stated that they have not been approached by RTD about the proposed transit station. Planning Commission Page 4 October 6, 2005 ere'17ere n* oulor intiviat, TV McMILLIN closed the public hearing. Commissioner WESLEY expressed concern that he would like to see development that is compatible with a future RID transit stop; however, it seems unfair to the developer to hold off for twelve or so years on a possible transit stop. Commissioner STEWART asked about the possibility of a traffic light • Ward. Mr. Crane explained that traffic lights are installed dependent on meeting warrant requirements. She expressed concern for the property owner to the south andwould like to see the right-of-way issue clarified. She would have no problem if there is existing right-of-way for the accel/decli lane on Ward. She was opposed to the use of eminent domain for obtaining right-of-way. On the other hand, he commented that RTD was not present to defend their interest in the property. Planning Commission Page 5 October 6, 2005 Commissioner STEWART stated that she could not support the motion without knowing for sure if • right-of-way exists for an accel/decel, laneon Ward. Commissioner CHILVE stated that the motion makes it incumbent upon the applicant to make the lane happen. Commissioner WESLEY commented that he didn't like creating a situation with the potential for use of eminent domain. Rick Gunter returned to the podium. He reminded the Commission that the accel/decel lane was not the applicant's idea. He agreed to have a survey done before the city council meeting. • different_29tions or default to CDOT rules that say there is no requirement for additional lanes outside of existing right-of- way. He stated the applicant has no interest in obtaining property by use of eminent domain. Commissioner STEWART offered a friendly amendment to conditions 3 and 4 of the motion approving the rezoning: The deceleration lane on Ward Road south at 50" Planning Commission Page 6 October 6, 2005 The amended motion was approved by a vote of 5-1 with Commissioner WESLEY voting no and Commissioners BRINKMAN and SPANIEL absent. I I 1. With slight modification, the Final Development Plan will comply with the development standards established by the Outline Development Plan. 2. The Final Development Plan meets the technical requirements as established in Article III for Final Development Plans. 1. Lot 6 shall be amended to include one more parking stall as required by the Outline Development Plan. 0- One additio be added to Lot 7 to meet minimum requirements established on the Outline Development plan. The motion passed 5-1 with Commissioner WESLEY voting no and Commissioners I'vRINKMAN and SPANIEL absent. Commissioner McMILLIN asked for an update on the lighting situation at Chase Plaza- Alan White stated that he had reported the situation to the community service officers, on 0 Commissioner STEWART expressed appreciation for the new lighting on Kipling. 10. COMMISSION REPORTS There were • commission reports. a 0 111#101-1- 1111111111111A I OW 111 164flu-ill I 12. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner CHILVERS and seconded by Commissioner PLUMMER to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. John McMillin, Chair I RVIIIIND"Mms Em I= ACTION REQUESTED: A request for approval of a lot line adjustment between two subdivided lots and a request for a variance to the minimum lot size for a duplex in the R-2 zone district. 4i APPLICANT (S): Gm*0 & Michelle Quintana 3295 Cody Court Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 OWNER (S): Thomas & Denise Colbum 8605 W. 3VPl. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Gino & Michelle Quintana APPROX TE AREA: 20,908.92 sq. ft. (0.48 ac.) PRESENT ZONING: Residential Two (R-2) ENTER INTO RECORD: COMPREBENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Location Map W THAVE' R-1 12NDPL� t: W �ZND PL Subject Properties All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. Planning Commission LLA-05-03 & WA-05-19/Quintana CASE ANALYSIS The applicants (owners) are requesting approval of a lot line adjustment and a lot size variance (Exhibit 1, Letter of Request). Lot 2 (3295 Cody Ct.) contains an existing single family structure. Lot 2 is approximately 9,000 square feet in size prior to the property transfer (Exhibit 2, Dudley Acres Subdivision Plat). IMM!HIR.M 0 M - I i 9411MOMOM01*14t NO 110 1" U01 I me minimum requirea sefoacKs or MWITIFUJI It W110t Verage 14"T MUTUT PV4'PVJT7=''F — r7SIT 41 7 7 6 1 ,6 11 W. 32n Pl.) is a somewhat typical cul-de-sac lot, with a small appendage which extends back to Cody Court, directly north of lot 2 (3295 Cody Ct.). The land has been maintained by the owners • lot 2, and it is logical that the land is transferred to lot 2. Planning Commission LLA-05-03 & WA-05-191Quintana Agtncy Referral All responding agencies have indicated that they can serve the property, and the applicant will bear the cost of upgrading any service to the property. Because each property has an existing structure, perimeter utility easements are not being required. 111. VARIANCE CRITERIA I co, 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? If the request is denied, each property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The J'.wja�6 S-T- transfer cannot • approved. 2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? If the request were granted, the character • the locality would not be altered. The duplex on lot 1 exists today. The transfer • land from one property to the other should have no effect • the, surrounding area. 3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of t specific property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? One of the lots does have a unique shape. Lot 1 (8605 W. 32� Pl.) is located on a cul-de- sac bulb. The current configuration of lot I is the main reason for the property transfer. The owners of lot I do not use the small strip • land being transferred to lot 2. Lot I currently does not meet the minimum lot size for a two-family dwelling in the R-2 zone district. 4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created ► any person presently having an interest in the property? toll The request would not be detrimental to the public welfare, The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised as • result • the,request. The request would not Planning Conunission 3 LLA-05-03 4 WA-05-19/Quintana increase congestion in the streets, nor increase the danger of fire. The request would most likely not have an effect • property values in the neighborhood. 6. If criteria I through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? I 9740 We property owner. Ine request To= not resuit, in a roasortavir, MQUILITTUSTion or a perm with disabilities. IV. STAFF CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDED MOTION (S): Each request will require a separate motion Variance &eAuest Staff concludes that the variance criteria are supportive ♦ the request. Therefore st recommends APPROVAL of the variance request. I OPTION A: "I move • APPROVE Case No. WA-05-19, a request for approval of a lot size variance for an existing two-family dwelling in the R-2 zone district, for property located at 8605 West 32 Place, for the following reasons: 1. The hardship has not been created by any person having interest in the property. 2. The two-family dwelling currently exists, and the reduced property size should have no impact on the surrounding neighborhood. OPTION "I move to DENY Case No. WA-05-19, a request for approval of a lot size variance for an existing'two-family dwelling in the R-2 zone district, for property located at 8605 West 32� Place, for the following reasons: 1. ...I' Planning Con fission 4 LLA-05-03 & WA-05-19/Quintana MIN 11 MytstinenL piat Yor properues Mate* 5Z.5i COUY on , or the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The land to be transferred is not being used by the owners of lot 1, and is a logical extension of lot OPTION B: "I move to DENY Case No. LLA-05-03, a request for approval of a lot line adjustment plat for properties located at 8605 West 32 Place and 3295 Cody Court for the following reasons: Planning Commission —,U� Gino and Michelle Quintana - Detailed Description of Request page 2 Ar r Av ... . YYM ,aexrar.�arl" .•fd �`` .,at ,� zow tea ! )544~ . m i r `etrrrr ag cse; earn t . r A*- :r el aza, �» remrr ` ✓ dk& n ti � . o s s rr v nJ <f <o*a r /a rr! All e~ 4vrwir 4 Olt aVr A lAK drj _ * gin r a y ,,� yw mow' t, 3 i of G Ar r { oe 0 Awe* x,-/ 't 0,100* Av ... . YYM ,aexrar.�arl" .•fd �`` .,at ,� zow tea ! )544~ . m i r `etrrrr ag cse; earn t . r A*- :r el aza, �» remrr ` ✓ dk& n ti � . o s s rr v nJ <f <o*a r /a rr! All e~ 4vrwir 4 Olt aVr A lAK drj _ * gin Ar 'i Ar A q SSSS� #' � � i "'�+� kep �� M+'f vT iY+C 3' "T✓ La^�` /fd a. "#' p fir J' .# ff' J A+ 6l✓``&" r , ' w ,L w •:' •,rye � _., �,y �!. _ /�> ,r� �✓'.w,'Jn'.i"� AY,Py{C�' 1F/ R7 owrrL.Mrn iso' AU- .Ri1PAF �+PIF" .:. J + zo SW yy� ry�.Pye .4- Y M1 *\ +0d^5FY4' Irr IAW. - ,.O N ` t i` s` , .. Ma w, , 1 . YYM Olt aVr A lAK drj _ * gin i'II a. y e a — — - — — — 5' UTILTfY EASEMENT PER DUDLEY ACRES PLA 14.00' 78.74 S89 29' 36' / PARCEL ADDED TO LOT 3, DUDLEY ACRES, / BY DEED RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO, F2025587 DUDLEY ACRES LO i j 9,0 SQ UARE FT A.. 0.22 .22 ACRES M JL PARCEL EXCEPTED FROM LOT 3 DUDLEY ACRES — ZONED: R2 BY DEED RECORDED AS a / ORIGINAL LOT LINE, LOT 3, DUDLEY ACRES RECEPTION NO, F2025587 co LOT / ZONED: R2 / ` DELTA= 111 27' 03' R = 45,00' - - - - L = 37,53` CH = 74,37' WEST 32nd / I i LOT 4 ZONED: R2 I I LOTS I ZONED; R2 I I I I BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST BY THIS PLAT DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT LENZINI AND ASSOCIATES, INC, IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE P.O. BOX 21457 CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON, DENVER, COLORADO 80221 ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND b SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 184508, COLORADO PLAT PREPARED SEPTEMBER 9, 2005 REVISED STATUTES, s e i a K)T 2 i 11,287,17 SQUARE FT, I I 0 0.26 ACRES M/L z QUINTANA PARCEL J ZONED: R2 z 0 N89 29' 36'E 100,00' (M) (R) i I I I I I I I UNSU oDMDDEDD I I I I I I ZONED: R2 I BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT LENZINI AND ASSOCIATES, INC, IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE P.O. BOX 21457 CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON, DENVER, COLORADO 80221 ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND 303 -748 -8330 SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 184508, COLORADO PLAT PREPARED SEPTEMBER 9, 2005 REVISED STATUTES, s e i I i I I i z 'ate 0 POINT OF BEGINNING GRAPHIC SCALE 1 " =20' 0 20 40 60 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PLAT NOTES FOUND 3 1/2' BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX MARKED CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLS # 13212 SET 1/2' REPAR AND PLASTIC CAP MARKED LENZINI PLS #11636 (M) INDICATES ACTUAL DISTANCE AS MEASURED IN FIELD (R) INDICATES DISTANCE PER RECORD BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 27, T3S, R69W AS MONUMENTED BY THE CRY OF WHEAT RIDGE ry 9 Riz au i I 0 - Zn I I I 104 I � I q I I I 0- I L% z ui z i i I I WE, GINO A. QUINTANA AND MICHELLE A. QUINTANA, AND THOMAS W. COLE BEING THE OWNERS OF THE REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING 0.48 ACRES MORE C THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, R THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERDIAN, AND PORTIONS OF LOT 2 AND LOT 3, DUDLEY AC OF WHICH 18 RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFF BOOK 22 AT PAGE 22, AND BEING MORE PARTICUARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOV COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF S89' 29' 36'W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 400.00 F' PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 33240 FEET TO POIP CONTINUING Nom° 04' 03' W, PARALLEL TO EAST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST t THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S89° 29'36'W ALONG THEM PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 170,24 FEET TO TH LOT 3; THENCE CONTINUING S89° 29' 36 W ALONG TIRE NORTH LINE OF SAID U IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AS RECE FEET ;, THENCE 31(? 13' 17'W, ALONG A LINE DESCRIBED IN SAID RECEPTION NC ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, SAID LINE BEING A NON RADIAL CURVI POINT OF WHICH BEARS SW 28'51'E; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID C SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, AN ARC LENGTH OF 87.53 FEET, A RADIUS OF 4 ANGLE OF 111 27'02 TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, SAID LINE BEING NON RADIAL TO THE AFO TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT' 3; THENCE SV 04' 03'E, PARALLEL T( QUARTER, 28.50 FEET, THENCE N89' 29' 36'E, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED SAID LAND AS PER THE DRAWING H CONTAINED UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF, QUINTANA LOT LINE ADJUSTMER A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO AND BY PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THOSE MUNICIPAL AND /OR MUNICIPALLY FRANCHISED UTILITIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS { PROPERTY SHOWN AS EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OF MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES. THIS INCLUDES NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LINES, WATER AND SANI SEWER LINES, HYDRANTS, STORM WATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONC STREET UGHTS AND ALL APPURTENANCES THERETO. GINO A. QUINTANA MICHELLE A, QUINTANA THOMAS W. COLBURN DENISE F. COLBURN STATE OF COLORADO } SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOLLOWING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , AD, 20_ -- BY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE L PAUL A. LENZINI, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF QUINTANA SUBDIVISION WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. PAULA. LENZINI, PLS 11636 PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS DAY OF BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIRPERSON — - CITY CERTIFICATION I APPROVED THIS DAY OF CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, I ATTEST i I i I C'1Ti CITY CLERK MAYOR SOUTHWEST CORNER SOUTH LINE NORTHEAST QUARTER NORTHEAST QUARTER SEC, 27, T3S, R69W — _ — $89 29' 36'W 2646,90' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION PREPARED BY BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT LENZINI AND ASSOCIATES, INC, IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE P.O. BOX 21457 CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON, DENVER, COLORADO 80221 ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND 303 -748 -8330 SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 184508, COLORADO PLAT PREPARED SEPTEMBER 9, 2005 REVISED STATUTES, REVISED OCTOBER 11, 2(%)5 REVISED NOVEMBER 14, 2005 Km CASE HISTORY LLA -05 -03 WA -05-14 400,00' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT SOUTHEAST CORNER NORTHEAST QUARTER SEC. 27, T3S, R69W DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF JEFFERSON }} I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK®.M, ON THE DAY OF A.D. IN BOO . , PAGE , RECEPTION NO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY ND DENISE F. COLBURN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; 69 WEST OF RN 27, THENCE IENCE NW 04'03'W, 3EGINNING; THENCE ER, 115.00 FEET TO INE OF SAID LOT 3, AND THWEST CORNER OF SAID i DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED NO, 1`202W7,14,00 %87,95,48 FEET TO A POINT IE RIGHT, THE RADIUS AND ALONG SAID ET, AND A CENTRAL 57'E, ALONG THE ITIONED CURVE 54.99 FEET :AST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST ORTHEAST QUARTER, 100.00 )NH City • Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 0 rn • Memorandum 0 TO: A anning Commission FROM: eredith Reckert SUBJECT: Case No. ZOA-05-04/Cr4 ss references DATE: November 22, 2005 4 -4 111 1111111 1 1111"GMAIR111011 IM Man al remes specifically to arcruiec ral standards in the City ot T-Th�lddge-%�h-�,,—A-a� requirements regarding fa�ade design, screening of mechanical equipment and acceptable architectural materials. SUGGESTED MOTION: W6.31"W" 1. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted legislation pertaining to the development standards for the commercial zone districts; 2. The City of Ridge has adopted legislation pertaining to streetscape and architectural design guidelines; 3. There are no cross references between the two different sets of standards." INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. ??-2005 Ordinance No. Series of 2005 i I 1 0 110 AN I IKII a v L04 py 1001jU fflwl V KI [4 mw tol!j a I U-1 #j W-1 r! I aq 1: 1 K a -k-0 ti I - MAI #I of - HIF"s • WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted legislation pertaining to areetscape and architectural design guidelines; WHEREAS, there are no cross references between the two different sets standards; I BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. Section 26-216. Neighborhood Commercial District (NC) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws is hereby amended as follows: 12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. Section 2. Section 26-217. Restricted Commercial District (RC) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws is hereby amended as follows: 12. Streetscape I and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. Section 3. Section 26-218. Cornmercial-One District (C-1) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws is hereby amended as follows: A. Intent andpurpose. This district is established to provide for areas with a wide range of commercial land uses which include office, general business, and retail sales and service establishments. This district is supported by the community and/or entire region. 12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape ant Architectural Design Manual. Section 4. Section 26-219. Commercial-Two District (C-2) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws is hereby amended as follows: 2 12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscapeand Architectural Design Manual. Section 5. Section 26-220. Light Industrial District (1). • the Wheat Ridge Code • Laws is hereby amended as follows: A. Intent andpurpose. The intent of this district is to permit the use of previous Industrial (1)-zbned property for commercial and light industrial uses. Rezoning to Industrial (1) Zone District classification shall not be perrmitted; however, existing Industrial (I)-zoned property may be developed and used in accordance with provisions set forth herein. 12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. Section 7. Severa• ility. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, • part • this Zoning code • the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 8. SHpLrsession Clause. If any provision, requirements • standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards here shall supersede and prevail. I Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of - to - in this - day of , 2005, ordered published in full in a newspa of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on fina passage set for --- 1 2005, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7506 West 29 Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of _ to -, this - day of 2005. SIGNED by the Mayor on this - day of 2005. JERRY DITULLIO, MAYOR Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk GERALD DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY I ST publication: 2� publication: In