The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWA-11-10City of l Wheat P j, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building August 18, 2011 Dr. Jonathan Walter 3900 Holland Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Case No. WA -11 -10 Dear Dr. Walter: 7500 W. 29'" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 -8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 Attached please find notice that your request for a 7.5 -foot variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement was approved for the purpose of constructing an anteroom addition on property at 3900 Holland Street. Please note there are two conditions on the approval: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed addition be similar in character to the existing house, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. Future additions on the north side of the property that encroach into the side setback will require a separate variance request. Enclosed is a copy of the Approval of Variance and staff report. Please note that all variance approvals automatically expire within 180 days of the date approval unless a building permit for the variance is been obtained within such period of time. The expiration date for this variance approval is February 14, 2012. Please feel free to be in touch with any further questions. Sincerely, Lauren Mikulak Planner I w .ci.wheatridge.co.us 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 ®� City of °� Wheatl�dge Approval of Variance WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 3900 Holland Street referenced as Case No. WA -11 -10 / Walter; and WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26 -115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 26 -109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application; NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 7.5 -foot variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement, resulting in a 7.5 -foot side yard setback for the purpose of constructing an addition on property in the Residential -One (R -1) zone district (Case No. WA -11 -10 /Walter), is granted for property located at 3900 Holland Street, based on the following findings of fact: 1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property that may not be possible without the variance. 3. The unique topographic conditions prevent a secondary entrance or addition at the rear of the property. 4. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 5. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 6. No objections were received regarding the variance request during the public notification period. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed addition be similar in character to the existing house, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. Future additions on the north side of the property that encroach into the side setback will require a separate variance request. Kenneth Johnstt4e, AICP Community De lopment Director Date 1 1�1 � 4 City of Wh6atRiLdge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Community Development Director DATE: August 18, 2011 CASE MANAGER: Lauren Mikulak CASE NO. & NAME: WA-11-10/Walter ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 7.5 -foot variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement Location Map Site Administrative Variance 1 Case No. WA- 11 -10I Walter on property located at 3900 Holland Street and zoned Residential -One (R -1) LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3900 Holland Street APPLICANT (S): Jonathan Walter OWNER (S): Jonathan Walter APPROXIMATE AREA: 13,784 (0.32 Acres) PRESENT ZONING: Residential -One (R -1) PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Location Map Site Administrative Variance 1 Case No. WA- 11 -10I Walter JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make an administrative decision. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 7.5 -foot (50 %) variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement, resulting in a 7.5 -foot side setback. The purpose of this variance is to allow for the construction of a 90- square foot addition on the north side of the property. Section 26 -115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the standard. II. CASE ANALYSIS The applicant, Jonathan Walter, is requesting the variance as the property owner of 3900 Holland Street. The variance is being requested so that the applicants may construct a 7.5' x 12' covered entry on the north side of an existing single - family home (Exhibit, l,; Aerial). The property is zoned Residential -One (R -1), a zone district that provides for high quality, safe, quiet and stable low- density residential neighborhoods, and prohibits activities of any nature which are incompatible with the low- density residential character. The subject parcel is predominantly surrounded by properties that are also zoned R -1 and contain single - family homes (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). The parcel has an area of 13,784 square feet and currently contains a one - story, single - family home. According to Jefferson County records, the house was constructed in 1961. The property meets the minimum lot area and lot width requirements for single - family homes in the R -1 district. Currently, entries to the home include a covered front door, a basement level garage on the south side of the house, and a side door on the north side of the house. The side door provides access between an patio atio and the kitchen. There is no back door on the east s ide of the home, in part because of an 8 -foot elevation change that spans the lot north to south (Exhibit X T Map). The owners are proposing a 7.5' x 12' addition on the north side of the home to enclose the side door (Exhibit 4, Plan. The addition would provide a utilitarian entry and would function as a "mud room" providing a transition between outdooribackyard activities and indoor living space. The homeowners have expressed that there is currently no sheltered, secure space for dirt, debris, and outdoor gear and clothing. In addition to providing a functional entry on the main level of the home, it will add a second layer of security to the side entrance. Currently, the home meets the side setback requirement, but it is exactly 15 feet from the property line. It is not possible to construct an addition on the north side of the home that can meet the minimum setback requirement. Although the property owners have a large backyard, there is no entry to the home from the backyard, so an addition on the east side is illogical. The only possible alternative is to Administrative Variance Case No. WA -11 -10 /Walter construct an addition that is open on three sides —this type of structure may encroach into the side setback up to 8 feet, but would not meet the needs of the property owners. The variance request would result in a 7.5 -foot side yard setback, and the proposed addition would meet all other development standards. The following table compares the required R -1 development standards with the actual and proposed conditions: R -I Development Standards: Required Actual Lot Area 9,000 square feet (min) 12,800 square feet Lot Width (corner lot) 80 feet (min) 146 feet (W. 35 frontage) 100 feet (Marshall frontage) One - Family Dwelling: Required Proposed Addition Building Coverage 40% (max) 16% Height 35 feet (max) t9 feet Front Setback 30 feet (min) 50 feet Side Setback 15 feet min 7.5 feet R ear Setback 15 feet (min) 75 feet During the public notification period neither inquiries nor objections were received regarding the variance request. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to approve an administrative adjustment, the Community Development Director must determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26- 115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria'(&hibit S, Criteria Response). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single - family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. A variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. The addition is proposed to be 50 feet from the front property line, and mature landscaping obscures the view from the right -of- way. The addition is designed to complement the house, and a 6 -foot fence separates the structure from the neighboring property (Exhzbit 61 Szte Photos'. Staff finds this criterion has been met. Administrative Variance Case No. WA -11 -10 /Walter 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property, which would not be possible without the variance. It is typical for the contemporary homeowner to desire a sheltered entry, and the addition will likely add value to the property. As documented in the summary above, there are no alternative locations for an enclosed addition, and an open shade structure is not considered as substantial of an investment, nor does it meet the needs of the property owner. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. There are unique topographical conditions that affect this property, notably a significant change in elevation from north to south. The change in elevation is about 8 feet, such that the basement of the home is at grade on the south side of the property. The grade change explains why there is no backdoor on the property, and why a side door was instead constructed as part of the original design of the home (Exhibit 3, Topo Map). Staff finds this criterion has been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The alleged difficulty relates to the location of the side door with respect to the existing home, setbacks, and elevation change. Because the owner neither platted the lot, nor constructed the home in its current location, the access difficulties have not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. Administrative Variance Case No. WA -11 -10 /Walter The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets. The garage would not impede the sight distance triangle and would not increase the danger of fire. It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. The unusual topographic conditions of the subject property are also are present throughout the neighborhood. The vertical elevation of Holland Street drops 40 feet from 38 Avenue to the subject property (Exhibit 3, Topo Map). The grade change explains the location of the applicant's side entrance into the home, and it is probable that the topography has similarly impacted the design of other homes in the neighborhood. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. S. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design ManuaL The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends APPROVAL of a 7.5 -foot (50 %) variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property that may not be possible without the variance. 3. The unique topographic conditions prevent a secondary entrance or addition at the rear of the property. 4. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. Administrative Variance Case No. WA -11 -10 /Walter 5. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 6. No objections were received regarding the variance request during the public notification period. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed addition be similar in character to the existing house, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. Future additions on the north side of the property that encroach into the side setback will require a separate variance request. Administrative Variance Case No. WA -11 -10 /Walter EXHIBIT l: AERIAL Administrative Variance Case No. W21-11 -10 / FValter EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP Administrative Variance Case No. W t -11 -10 / Walter EXHIBIT 3: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Administrative Valance 9 Case No. IVA -11 -10 / {Valter EXHIBIT 4: SITE PLAN Note: The site plan shows the original design for an 18' x 10' addition. The enclosed part of the addition was since modified to 12' x 7.5' (orange rectangle) to qualify for administrative variance approval. East West North Administrative Variance 10 CaselVo. WA -11 -10 /Walter EXHIBIT 5: CRITERIA RESPONSE Answers to Variance Criteria: 3900 Holland Street, 80033 A) The proposed structure will allow safer and cleaner access to the interior of the house from the north side. There is otherwise no "back door" to the house and this north entrance goes directly into the kitchen. B) The proposed structure will not alter the character of the locality because 1) it will cosmetically complement the house, (2) will be hidden partially from view from the street by a privacy fence and (3) is not unlike some other structures in the neighborhood. C) This structure represents an approximate $25,000 investment in the property. D) The "back door" to the kitchen of the house is located on the north side where the exterior wall is 15 feet from the property line. There is no other utilitarian type entryway where this can be constructed. The structure will alleviate the unique hardship of not having a secured, sheltered area outside the back door to keep dirt, debris, outdoor gear and clothes from entering the house. It will add security as a second barrier to cross before entering the house proper. E) No difficulties or hardships are imposed by any outside persons, F) This structure does not encroach on any other property, nor does it hamper development of the neighborhood. It will have no effect on light or air circulation not impose a fire hazard. It will enhance property value. G) An informal visual survey of the neighborhood shows similar structures elsewhere without detrimental visual or physical effect. Respectfully submitted, Jonathan Walter Marilyn Choske Administrative Variance Case No. WA -11 -10 1Walter EXHIBIT 6: SITE PHOTOS Looking west at 3900 Holland Street (blue house); proposed location of the addition is identified by the arrow above and is not visible from the right -of -way. Administrative Variance 12 Case No. WA -11 -10 / Wal(er , i'y of Wheat Ridge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. WA -11 -10 DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS: August 17, 2011 �/ C (n �_ r �] I dl 5 residing at 3 73 l - f p j f zo a d/ 1 Y' , (/V�Z LQ (< C C� ?�� 3• (address) as the applicant for Case No. Public Notice at on this 8` WA -11 -10 3900 Holland Street hereby certify that I have posted the sign for (location) day of August, 2011, and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for ten (10) days prior to and including the deadline for written comments regarding this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature: ' NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Com n evelopment Department for this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file. MAP f IX3920 C13900 03975 ._..- ..,..�� .m._, -_.. _,.. -.. .�....� .. .......... : 03920 0:415 03906 F '✓3 03900 00905 � Q y _ � 03880 CL3895 04880 04885 03854 03865 03870 04875 WALTER JONATHAN E �n v 39- 223 -10 -007 3900 HOLLAND ST I v WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4219 7011 0470 0002 3336 1800 HUGLEY JOEL 39- 223 -10 -008 7011 0470 0002 3336 1794 KIMSEY DONNA B 3920 HOLLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4219 MARTIN SCOTT G DRESSEL 39- 223 -10 -012 MARTIN AMY E DRESSEL 7011 0470 000 33 36 1 78 7 3915 GARLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4210 SPITELLIE MICHAEL JR. 39- 223 -10 -013 SPITELLIE JOANNE K 7 011 047 00 02 3336 1770 3905 GARLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4210 MEYER GARY F 39- 223 -10 -014 7011 0470 0002 3336 1763 ZACHARIAS RAYMOND G 3895 GARLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4208 FIELD ROYAL J 39- 223 -10 -006 7011 0470 0002 3336 1756 FIELD ELMA L 3880 HOLLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4217 SPAW GARY B I 39- 223 -01 -092 7011 0470 0002 3336 1749 SPAW SUSAN A ICJ 3975 HOLLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4218 SOLANO ANTHONY 39- 223 -09 -008 7011 0470 0002 3336 1732 SOLANO TON] 3895 HOLLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4216 GIOIA GENE G 39- 223 -09 -010 7011 0470 0002 3336 1725 GIOIA MARGARET A 3885 HOLLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4216 City of Wheat�idge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 -8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE August 8, 2011 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA- 11 -10, a request for approval of 7.5 foot side yard setback variance from the 15 foot side yard setback requirement on property zoned Residential -One (R -1) and located at 3900 Holland Street. The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than a fifty percent (50 %) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303 - 235 -2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on August 17, 2011. Thank you. WA I l0.doc www.ci.wheatridge.co.us I o v o v U Is puepeE) Is M N O O O O O C a o� a 0 0 0 LO 0 0 C O 0 M O co 0 O O O rn O o � o N � M O N O O Q � O O O t m O M - N 00 00 m 0= C� o � Is M N N N 0 � O O G M C ow O � O O O � e Is C L u R cco� 08/01/2011 09:00 FAX 3032352857 PLANNING 3032352846 a 002/002 City of Wheatj�idge LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29 Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235 -2846 l - (Please print or type all information) Applicant c) 1/t 0 �> - Address 3 ? 0e) 1Yd � / t�l»/'V 1 Phone City (� State CO Zip c9 O 33 F2x3c Owner Address Phone City s State Zip Fax Contact Address Phone City State Zip Fax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): - -7 �-,9 h Pl t7� ( t 41 0 033 Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request) Applicarion subeiinnl regniremenls on reverse side ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions O Special Use Permit O Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) O Consolidation Plat O Conditional Use Permit O Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) O Flood Plain Special Exception O Site Plan approval ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Lot Line Adjustment O Concept Plan approval 'Variance/Waiver (from Section ) O Planned Building Group O Right of Way Vacation O ther: Detailed description of Required information: Assessors Parcel Numbe Current Zoning: Current Use: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): Proposed Zoning: Proposed Use: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action catmot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power- of- attorr�from gz �lr 1 ch approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Subscribed day of 20 -u— PUBO'My To be filled out by staff: .. " O / 4 �ii� OF COQ' Date received d yCo � m /scion ExQa Fee Receipt No. Comp Plan Desig. Zonin Related Case No Pre -App Mtg. Date Case No. WA- 11 — In Quarter Section Map G) ... —? Case Manager le-c— && s 30.00 �C)UNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO 9/30/94 13:15 b� [Space Above This Line For Recording Data] DEED OF TRUST THIS DEED OF TRUST ( "Security Instrument ") is made on SEPTEMBER 27, 1994 among the grantor, JONATHAN E. WALTER AND MARILYN CHOSKE ( "Borrower "), the Public Trustee of JEFFERSON County ( "Trustee "), and the beneficiary, AUSTIN MORTGAGE INCORPORATED which is organized and existing un ;& laws of COLORADO 251 KI INf� TET SUITE 210 and whose address rs 4 Lender" .Borrower owes Lender the principal sum of WHEAT GEC C�j&RADO 80033 (' ) ONE HUNDRED SI QBTE`vI10USAND EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY AND 00/100 0 , ;...t Dollars (U.S. $ 161, 850.00 This debt is evidenced l 6Bor&er;9 �'pte dated the same date as this Security Instrument ( "Note "), which provides for monthly payments, with th r r�ll d�pj, i (Sipaid earlier, due and payable on OCTOBER 1, 2024 This Security Instrument secures to Lender: (a) the repayment of the debt evidenced by the Note, with interest, and all renewals, extensions and modifications of the Note; (b) the payment of all other sums, with interest, advanced under paragraph 7 to protect the security of this Security Instrument; and (c) the performance of Borrower's covenants and agreements under this Security Instrument and the Note. For this purpose, Borrower, in consideration of the debt and the trust herein created, irrevocably grants and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, the following described property located in JEFFERSON County, Colorado: LOT 7, WILDWOOD, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. fIRST AMERICAN which has the address of 3900 HOLLAND STREET, WHEAT RIDGE � L [street, City], Colorado 80033 [Zip Code] ( "Property Address'); a COLORADO - Single Family- FNMATHLMC UNIFORM HERITAGETITLE INSTRUMENT Form 3006 1191 11209 LS /- III solo" " Amended 5191 23 9 14 G 06 - 6RICOIISZOSt.ot 23 VMP MORTGAGE FORMS - !8001521 -72 /JA' Pane 1 of 6 Initial LTV ✓ Jul. 20. 2011 12: 25 PM No, 8 10 7 P. 2 Answers to Variance Criteria: 3900 Holland Street, 80033 A) The proposed structure will allow safer and cleaner access to the interior of the house from the north side. There is otherwise no "back door" to the house and this north enhance goes directly into the kitchen. B) The proposed structure will not alter the character of the locality because 1) it will cosmetically complement the house, (2) will be hidden partially from view from the street by a privacy fence and (3) is not unlike some other structures in the neighborhood. C) This structure represents an approximate $25,000 investment in the property. D) The "back door" to the kitchen of the house is located on the north side where the exterior wall is 15 feet from the property line. There is no other utilitarian type entryway where this can be constructed. The structure will alleviate the unique hardship of not having a secured, sheltered area outside the back door to keep dirt, debris, outdoor gear and clothes from entering the house. It will add security as a second barrier to cross before entering the house proper. E) No difficulties or hardships are imposed by any outside persons. F) This structure does not encroach on any other property, nor does it hamper development of the neighborhood. It will have no effect on light or circulation nor impose a fire hazard. It will enhance property value. G) An informal visual survey of the neighborhood shows similar structures elsewhere without detrimental visual or physical effect. RespectfWly submitted, Jonathan Walter Marilyn Choske -� � -- - -- _..__.. - -- -- - �� -_' _. �- - I -' �L VL- � ___j . __; - ' - - -- i -- -�_� .. - L�-�- - -- - - I i i _1_ - -- i I I Ak I I i Property Information , .. IN 1 1 OF 5 Next Section Township GENERAL INFORMATION Schedule: 023467 Parcel ID: 39- 223 -10 -007 Status: Active Property Type: Residential Property Address: 03900 HOLLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4219 Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY Neighborhood: 2406 - BEL AIRE,HILLCREST HEIGHTS, MELROSE MANOR AREA Print Help Owner Name(s) WALTER JONATHAN E.. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Subdivision Name: 836000 - WILDWOOD Block Lot lKey Section Township Range QuarterSection La nd Sgft BSMTTOTAL 0007 Warranty Deed -Joint Tenancy 22 13 69 1SW 13784 COVERED PORCH Average TBA. 220. BSMT GARAGE Average. Total 1137 A Assessor Parcel Maps Associated with Schedule �map39- 223.pdf Year Built: 1961 Improvement Number: Adjustment Code.Adjustment Sq Ft HOT WTR HEAT 11682 BSMTHOT 1769 SALE HISTORY Adjusted Year Built: 1961 Areas Quality '.. Construction Sqft FIRST FLOOR Average M 1682'. BSMTTOTAL Average Warranty Deed -Joint Tenancy 769 BSMT FINISHED Average Quit Claim Deed 769 COVERED PORCH Average TBA. 220. BSMT GARAGE Average. TBA 913 COVERED PORCH Low 224 (U ,� Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception 08 -05 -1974 54,000 Assessed Value 26510659 09-27-1994 179,900 Warranty Deed -Joint Tenancy 94158465 02 -07 -2002 0 Quit Claim Deed F1420741 TAX 2011 Payable 2012 y Actual Value Tota 1 290,940 County Assessed Value Total 23,158 2010 Payable 2011 TBA'.. Actual Value Total 307,980 TBA Assessed Value Total 24,515. Treasurer Information View Mill Levy Detail For Year 201 2011 Mill Levy Information i Tax District 3137'. County TBA School TBA W HEAT RIDGE TBA'.. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIST. TBA URBAN DRAINAGE &FLOOD CONT DIST TBA URBAN DRAINAGE &FLOOD C SO.PLAT TBA' W HEATRIDGE FIRE DIST. TBA. W ESTRIDGE SAN. DIST. TBA WHEATRIDGE W. DIST. TBA Total TBA Graphic Parcel Mao MagQuest Location f 2010 PROPERTY INVENTORY Property Type RESID Design: Ranch City of Wheat clge LAND USE APPLICATION FORM - C..o -•U JMT DF. VELGPMEh`T Case No. FA1 110 Date Received C 8/5/2017 Related Cases Case Planner Mik Case Description 7.5 ff. side yard setback variance L —� Afip rawtIR omr.bm Name Jonathan E. Walter Name Phone L303j456 -6279 Address 39� lland St. l '. City Wheaf Ridge —] Slate CO ] Zip 80033- _....--------- - - -- o7AA7fma&w —.. -- - -- — — Name ',J onathan E. Walter Name L � Phone [(30 456 -6279 = ---- .-- ... -- - --- -- - -------- — - ---- — Addressj3900HollandSt. City Wheat - R idge ! State !CO Zip 80D33- Covrfasf — Name �JonathanE Walter Name Phone (303)456 -6279 t---- - -- __ - -- - - -- Address 1 3900 Holland St. City (Wheat Ridge �' State ICO Zip 80033 - Pmjecf l.'tomrafioa — -- -- Address 3900 Street Holland Street City Wheat Ridge Stale CO Zip80033 — w ___ Location Description Project Name - - - Parcel No. X39- 223 -10 -OW Qtr Section: [SW22 District No.: i7eviem� Pre -App Date Neighborhood Meeting Date App No: F — --vi �-- ---- - - - - -- Review Type ,.' Review Body Review Date Disposition Comments Report r El CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 08/05/11 8:21 AN cdba JONATHAN E WALTER RECEIPT NO:CDA006226 AMOUNT FMSD ZONING APPLICATION F 200.88 ZONE PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT CK 2366 200.00 TOTAL 200.00