HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-12-04City of
W h 6 at 11
C c 1:tle
omp
OMMUNiTy DEVELOPMtNl
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303235.2846 F. 301235.2857
March 16, 2012
Republic Garages
Attn: Mr. Jerry Krizek
2532 S. Broadway
Denver, CO 802 10
Re- Case No. WA -12 -011
Attached please find notice that your requests for a 5-foot variance from the 25-foot side yard
setback requirement for a side yard adjacent to a public street has been approved for the purpose
of constructing a detached garage on property at 12500 W. 32 Avenue.
Enclosed is a copy of the Approval of Variance and staff report. All variance approvals
automatically expire within 180 days of the date approval unless a building permit for the variance
is been obtained within such period of time. The expiration date for this variance approval is
September 12, 2012.
Please feel free to be in touch with any further questions.
www.d.wheatridgetoms
A 11(
7500 West 29th Avenue City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wh6a-tF e
303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 % A�
WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at
referenced as Case No. WA -12 -04 / Republic Garages, and
WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section
26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section
26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and
WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application;
NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 5-foot variance from the 25-foot setback
requirement for a side yard adjacent to a public street, resulting in a 20-foot side yard setback for
the purpose of constructing a detached garage on property in the Residential-Two (R-2) zone
district (Case No. WA - -04 1 Republic Garages), is granted for property located at 12500 W. 32"
Avenue, based on the following findings of fact:
With the following conditions:
1. The first 25-feet of the driveway from the edge of pavement into the site be surfaced with
concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or other similar hard surfaced material in compliance with
Section 26- 501.D.1 of the City Code,
2. The design and architecture of the proposed structure be similar in character to the existing
house, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit.
Date
IV City Of
W heat - �iclge
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Community Development Director DATE: March 15, 2012
CASE MANAGER: Lauren Mikulak
CASE NO. & NAME: WA -12 -04 / Republic Garages
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 5 -foot variance from the 25 -foot side yard setback requirement
when adjacent to a public street on property located at 12500 W. 32` Avenue
and zoned Residential -Two (R -2)
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 12500 W. 32' Avenue
APPLICANT (S):
OWNER (S):
APPROXIMATE AREA:
Republic Garages
Daniel and Kristin Willis
10,395 Square Feet (0.239 Acres)
PRESENT ZONING:
PRESENT LAND USE:
Residential -Two (R -2)
Single Family Residential
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
Location Map
Site
Administrative Variance 1
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
JURISDICTION:
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make an
administrative decision.
I. REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a 5 -foot (20 %) variance from the 25 -foot side yard setback
requirement for a side yard adjacent to a public street, resulting in a 20 -foot side setback. The purpose
of this variance is to allow for the construction of a two -car detached garage on the southwest side of
the property.
Section 26 -115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of
Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative variances from the strict
application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of
the standard.
II. CASE ANALYSIS
The applicant, Republic Garages, is requesting the variance on behalf of the property owners of
12500 W. 32 Avenue. The variance is being requested so that the property owners may construct a
20' x 20' detached garage on the west side of the property, adjacent to the southwest corner of the
existing single - family home (Exhibit 1, Aerial).
The property is zoned Residential -Two (R -2), a zone district that provides for high quality, safe, quiet
and stable low to moderate - density residential neighborhoods, and prohibits activities of any nature
which are incompatible with the residential character.
The subject parcel is adjacent to residential and commercial land uses (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). On the
south side of W. 32 Avenue, the lot is surrounded by properties that are also zoned R -2 and contain
single - family homes. Across W. 32 Avenue to the north are properties zoned Neighborhood
Commercial (NC) and Restricted Commercial (RC). To the northwest is the Applewood Village
Shopping Center zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD). Two blocks to the west is
Youngfield Street and the Interstate -70/W. 32 Avenue interchange.
The subject parcel has an area of 10,395 square feet and currently contains a two -story brick single -
family home. The home is located in the middle of the lot, and according to Jefferson County records,
it was originally constructed in 1899.
The home was one of the original homesteads in this area of Wheat Ridge. A 2006 CDOT Cultural
Resources Survey associated with the I- 70/32 Avenue Interchange EA indicates that the property is
referred to as the former James Truelson farmhouse. Truelson was a Danish immigrant who settled in
the area in the 1880s and operated the Shadow Valley Farm producing vegetables, livestock, and
honey until the 1950s. The farm property was gradually subdivided and developed, with the exception
of the subject lot. An original barn structure and driveway used to be located on the lot to the south.
That southern portion of the Truelson property was the last piece to be subdivided; the barn has since
been replaced with a single - family home to the south of the subject lot (Exhibit 1, Aerial).
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
When the southern portion of the property was subdivided off, it eliminated all off - street parking for
the subject property. There is no garage, carport, or driveway on the property, so the owners currently
park vehicles in the right -of -way along on Wright Court. The proposed 20' x 20' garage would
provide off - street parking and storage. A new driveway will need to be surfaced with concrete,
asphalt, brick pavers or other similar hard surfaced material to comply with Section 26- 501.D.1 of the
City Code.
The property is a corner lot with frontage on W. 32 "d Avenue and Wright Court. In the R -2 zone
district, any side yard which abuts a public street is required to have a minimum setback of 25 feet for
all structures. Although the proposed garage would encroach 5 feet into this required setback, the
structure would not interfere with the sight triangle. In addition, the proposal complies with Section
26 -625 which requires detached garages to be 18 feet or farther from the right -of -way. A six -foot
privacy fence along the rear property line will provide relief to neighboring properties from the
potential visual impact of the variance (Exhibit 3, Site Plan).
There are very few alternative locations for a detached garage on the property. To meet the side
setback in the proposed location, the garage would either need to be shifted 5 feet to the east or be
reduced in size. A shift to the east would conflict with an existing patio and may compromise the
adequate supply of light and air to several windows that exist on the south side of the home (Exhibit 4,
Site Photos). The proposed garage is already relatively small with a depth of 20 feet, so it is
impractical to reduce the size of the garage as a way to conform to the minimum setback.
An alternative location for the garage would be on the eastern side of the home. This option may not
require a variance, but is less desirable for several reasons. West 32 Avenue is currently classified as
a minor arterial and carries high traffic volume at this location with proximity to the Applewood
Shopping Center entrance and I -70 interchange. Driveway access off of W. 32" Avenue could be
unsafe, particularly if a vehicle is backing out into the street. In addition, the northeastern side of the
property has a notable change in elevation. There is a 4 -foot change in elevation between the home
and the eastern property line which presents a challenge for constructing a garage and driveway in this
location (Exhibit S, Topo Ma.
A business owner from across W. 32 " Avenue to the north has also provided input supporting the
proposed location for aesthetic reasons. Though not a designated historic landmark —the subject home
has historic and architectural value, and a garage on the W. 32 Avenue frontage could diminish that
value and create more of a visual impact.
Finally, the Public Works Department has provided input regarding the alternatives for a curb cut and
street access. The department has expressed a strong preference locating a new curb cut on Wright
Court instead of W. 32 Avenue because the latter serves as a primary east -west corridor for the south
part of City. Wright Court is classified as a local street and has significantly less traffic volume.
The last option that may not require a variance would be an attached two -car garage, but this option is
likely a cost- prohibitive investment and could change the character of the historic home.
Ultimately, the variance request would result in a 20 -foot side yard setback, and the proposed garage
would meet all other development standards including height and maximum size. The parcel meets
minimum standards for the R -2 zone district, and total building coverage with the proposed garage
would be 18 1 /o—well below the maximum 40% allowed in R -2. The following table compares the
required R -2 development standards with the actual and proposed conditions:
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
R -2 Development Standards:
Required
Actual
Lot Area
9,000 square feet (min)
10,395 square feet
Lot Width (corner lot)
80 feet (min)
106.5 feet (W. 32 Ave)
98.35 feet (Wright Ct)
Major Accessory Structures:
Required
Proposed Garage
Building Size
1,000 square feet (max)
400 square feet
Height
15 feet (max)
10 feet
Front Setback
25 feet min
70 feet
Side Setback
25 feet min
20 feet
Rear Setback
5 feet (min)
5 feet
During the public notification period staff received three inquiries regarding the variance request. The
property owner to the east at 3185 Wright Street inquired as to the details of the variance request and
expressed no concerns. The homeowner immediately to the south at 3162 Wright Court had no
concerns with the side setback variance. The homeowner inquired as to the status of the tree on the
south property line. Staff confirmed with the applicant that the tree will remain in place, and the
neighbor and applicant have since met each other and discussed the project.
As mentioned above, a business owner from across the street expressed support for the proposed
location on Wright Court and expressed explicit concerns with any alternative that resulted in a garage
on the W. 32 Avenue frontage.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
In order to approve an administrative variance, the Community Development Director must determine
that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26- 115.C.4 of the City Code have been
met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance
criteria (Exhibit 6, Criteria Response). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the
variance criteria.
1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located.
If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The
property would continue to function as a single - family residence, regardless of the outcome of
the variance request.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
A variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. The R -2 zone district allows for
detached garages, and most homes in the neighborhood have two -car garage doors that face a
public street. Properties in the area represent a wide range of architectural styles — including
commercial structures to the north, a modern two -story home on the property to the south, and
Administrative Variance 4
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
ranch style homes in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed garage will have lap siding
similar to that on the rear of the home and is designed to be unobtrusive (Exhibit 7, Elevations).
The variance request may improve the character of the locality by allowing enclosed storage of
vehicles that are currently stored on the side of the property and visible from the public right -
of -way.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application,
which would not be possible without the variance.
The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property, which would not be
possible without the variance. It is typical for the contemporary homeowner to desire off - street
covered parking, and a detached two -car garage is expected to add value to the property.
As documented in the case analysis above, alternative locations for the garage are either less
desirable, less safe, or cost - prohibitive. A garage on the east side of the property would require
driveway access off of W. 32" d Avenue which neither the property owner, nor the Public Works
Department prefers.
Staff finds this criterion has been met
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific
property results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried
out.
There are unique topographical conditions that affect this property, notably a change in
elevation on the east side of the property that limits alterative placements. The change in
elevation is about 4 feet and inhibits placement of a garage.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property.
The alleged difficulty relates to the location of the proposed garage with respect to the existing
home, setbacks, street frontages and topography. Because the current owner neither platted the
lot, nor constructed the home in its current location, the difficulties have not been created by
any person presently having an interest in the property.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located,
by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or
development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing
Administrative Variance
Case No. IVA -I2-04 /Republic Garages
the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or
impairing property values within the neighborhood.
The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to
neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the
adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result
of this request.
The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it cause an obstruction
to motorists on the adjacent streets. The garage would not impede the sight distance triangle
and would not increase the danger of fire.
It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood. The garage
may in fact have a positive effect on the neighborhood by allowing storage of vehicles that are
currently parked on the side of the property and visible from the public right -of -way.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in
the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
There are no unique or unusual circumstances present in the neighborhood that are also present
on the property that necessitate the need for a variance.
Staff finds that this criterion has not been met.
8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with
disabilities.
Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes
pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities.
Staff finds this criterion is not applicable
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the
Architectural and Site Design Manual
The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling
units.
Staff finds this criterion is not applicable
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends
APPROVAL of a 5 -foot (20 %) variance from the 25 -foot side yard setback requirement for a side yard
adjacent to a public street. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request
that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following
reasons:
Administrative Variance 6
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
I . The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
2. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property that may not be possible
without the variance.
3. The lot has two street frontages which require increased setbacks and limit placement options
for the proposed garage.
4. The topography of the lot and traffic on W. 32 " Avenue further reduce alternative placement
options.
5. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the
property.
6. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare.
7. No objections were received regarding the variance request during the public notification
period.
With the following conditions:
1. The first 25 -feet of the driveway from the edge of pavement into the site be surfaced with
concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or other similar hard surfaced material in compliance with
Section 26- 501.D.1 of the City Code.
2. The design and architecture of the proposed structure be similar in character to the existing
house, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit.
Administrative Variance 7
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL
I
A .
0 1 1
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
[Exhibit 1: Aerial, continued]
Site
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
Barn and driveway
previously associated
with the subject lot
9
The following aerial image from 2001 shows the original barn structure to the south of the home. The
barn was removed sometime between and this lot has since been developed under separate ownership.
EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP
A -1
z
6d
w
CS
1 r
C -1
1 w
Ln
Li
LL
c�
C
PCd
r �
f
t - iii
34TH -PL-
R -1 A
6
f• �
r 1
U
N -C
c?
32 N D-AV E -
Coo�i
4 j
I C7s ! T
F � —
31 ST
AW
jam, . �• �• f•' .�� � � --
R -1
� R -3
e
R -b
Administrative Variance 10
Case No. WA -12 -04 / Republic Garages
f f
A R
.r
t - iii
34TH -PL-
R -1 A
6
f• �
r 1
U
N -C
c?
32 N D-AV E -
Coo�i
4 j
I C7s ! T
F � —
31 ST
AW
jam, . �• �• f•' .�� � � --
R -1
� R -3
e
R -b
Administrative Variance 10
Case No. WA -12 -04 / Republic Garages
EXHIBIT 3: SITE PLAN
THIS CERTIFICATION WAS DONE WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A WILLEY
CURRENT TITLE POLICY OR TITLE COMMITMENT, , RL• Imo• 11373 DECATUR COURT
THEREFORE, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF I / WESTMINSTER, CO 80234
RECORD ARE NOT A PART OF THIS CERTIFICATION.
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT FNGINFERING SURVEYING
PHONE 303 6351673 FAX 303 6351674
k
J= 'ter • ;• , .c . - • : : CONCRE WALKS FOUND CENTER 114
�,.� �'. t - - • u- �_ = T ti- y'R_ -'— Vii. -- � - .
SECTION 29
3 1/4" CAP IN BOX
— 488.35' - -- -
WEST 32ND AVENUE _
- (80' R.O.W.) / I!
0
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
LOT 12
' •a CONCRETE WALKS = • : . - r. MAPLE GROVE VILLAGE RESUB 1
r 4 � •M •
FOUND 2.9 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON
water NOTHING STATE OF COLORADO
g 5 meter 91.41 (TYPICAL)
FIRE _ 8' UTILITY EASEMENT x 12500 WEST 32ND AVENUE
HYDRANT r COVERED
52 U.E. - UTILITY EASEMENT
5.3 5.3 PORCH 5.0 I I
• U.E. I '
20 11.5 ° 11.5 1
1 4 CHAIN UNKr_, 380 4' CHAIN LINKI FLOOD INFORMATION:
1 112 STORY SUBJECT PROPERIY IS LOCATED OUTSIDE
321" ow BRICK AND w U THE LIMITS OF THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN,
Er o WOOD FRAME o 35.T LL ACCORDING TO THE FEMA/HUD FLOOD
O J I 12500 I Ico INSURA RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. Ir U O ¢ 085019 0005 C. DATED FEB. 04. 1988..
Z 8.0 110 cn w
.1 n I FLAG m m U
S a POLES �+ �+ l
. op Y 22.0 8'CONCRETE REG
t . WALLS I I 'pQP
CON
W K -4" PATIO. SMALL WROUGHT p a
s IRON +/-3' FENCE U
A0' � n .:. } 32� 235
a —
U.E. 2.7'
5 106.50 U.E. ��. / s 5
}; R 6 CEDAR FENCE �A LP
�— JOHN D. WILLEY, COLORADO L.ti .#23528
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE
TO: BECKER FAMILY TRUST
I hereby certify that the improvemerks on the described parcel, except utility connections,
are entirely within the boundaries of said parcel, except as shown, that there are no
encroachments upon the desch bed premises by improvements on any adjoining premises,
except as indicated, and that there is no evidence or sign of any easement crossing or
burdening any part of said parcel, except as noted. I further certify that this improvement
location certificate is not a land survey plat or improvement survey plat, and that it is not
to be relied upon for the establishment of fences, buildings or other future improvement
lines.
Based on the lack of monumentation found in the area a "BOUNDARY SURVEY"
is recommended for any future improvements.
Title Co. No. N/A
JOB NO. 11795 Date of Certificate: OCT. 13, 2011
WILLEY RLS, INC. 11373 DECATUR CT. WESTMINSTER, CO. 80234
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
EXHIBIT 4: SITE PHOTOS
View of the property from W. 32 "" Avenue looking south. Uneven topography makes it difficult to
locate a garage and driveway on the east side of the property (left side of this image).
Administrative Variance 12
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
Administrative Variance 13
Case No. WA- 12 -04l Republic Garages
EXHIBIT 5: TOPO MAP
The change in elevation on the north east side of the property is about 4 feet between the home and the
eastern property line.
Administrative Variance 14
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
EXHIBIT 6: LETTER OF REQUEST
March 5, 2012
We are requesting to build a 20' x 20' detached 20' off west property line (Wright St) where a 25'
setback is required. We feel the garage would create a court yard affect and block off the noise that
does occur from 32 " Ave. By locating the garage on the east side of the property line that would create
a 32" d Ave driveway which does not seem to be safe. By locating the garage on the east property line
and facing the overhead doors towards the west the elevation would require a 6' retaining wall and it
would interfere with the tree that is located on the south property line.
Thank you,
;Republic es
Response to Criteria
March 5, 2012
A. The property would yield a return. It would be a safety factor for entry.
B. The approval would not alter the character of the locality. It makes sense for the garage to face
the west.
C. The property is being remodeled and would make a difference if the garage would be moved
towards the west 5' for better positioning to the house and the tree to the south.
D. By approving the variance, the house would comply with fire regulations of 5' setback from
house and not to interfere with the landscaping to the south.
E. The hardship has always existed. The positioning the garage 20' off Wright Street makes the
garage comply with Fire regulations of 5' and to reduce the noise factor off 32 " Ave.
F. Granting the variance would not affect the neighborhood. The cars would still be on the
driveway with a view of cars entering Wright St from 32 " and cars would be visible from the
south.
G. I would believe that house facing 32 Ave. would have similar circumstances.
Administrative Variance 1
Case No. WA -12 -04 /Republic Garages
EXHIBIT 7: ELEVATIONS
APPROVED
Subject to Field Inspections
Wheat Ridge Building Dept.
iz
East Elevation ( facing Wright Court)
1
1
Date:
Plan checker
$o ye f7:�+ctN3:oVA�
G
Z10 -,r "
North Elevation
West Elevation
South Elevation
16
Case No. WA -12 -04 / Republic Garages
LO ,
Ap .
0
mogymasuariagam
3185 WRIGHT ST
iwfllwl,,
7010 2780 0002 5833 5526
7 010 2780 0002 5833 553
7010 2780 0002 583 5540
AUSTIN VINCENT E 7010 2780 0002 5833 5557
RIVERA ROBERTA E
12550 W 32ND AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 5255
FLUETSCH KIMBERLY
3175 WRIGHT CT
l X I
7010 2780 0002 5833 5564
7010 2780 0002 5833 5571
7010 2780 0002 5833 5588
1* 6 1 1(
W, City Of
!
"j,.dge
COMMUNiTy DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29 "' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
May=
MEIMSMV�
This is to inform you of Case No. W- 1 . 2 -04, a request for approval of a 5 foot
variance to the 25 foot side yard setback requirement when adjacent to a public
street resulting in an 20 foot side yard setback for property zoned Residential-Two
(R-2) and located at 12500 W. 32 Avenue
The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which
allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning
Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a
decision, all adiacent j2rogerly owners are required to be notified of the request
by certified mail.
If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or
if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in
writing by 5:00 p.m. on March 14, 2012.
Mw=
WAl204,doc
www.d.wheatridge.co.us
W 26TH AVE
I
22201M : * iM �.�
Ll Rom LCI I a ra I 4
Cheater Portsmouth Park
0
r
VEFAKTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
PLANNING AND OEVELOMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001
1.' 4 14,
�# *I City of
6at��icte
LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
7500 West 29"' Avenue * Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 - Phone (303) 235-2846
(Please print or type all information)
Applicant Ferublic Garages — Address 2532 S Broadvay Phone 303-781-940*
city renver State Cc - Zip _10 2 10 Fax 303-781-4170
Owner raniel Villis Address 12500 V 32nd
Cit i�heat ridge State co — zip,
Phone 7-33 5-4557
Fax
Contact___j��/Fe �Ubll�cGar�ages Address 2532 Sou�b �Loadway Phone 3-906-1579
city Lenver State Zip0210 Fax_3D3-jaj-4jjQ_
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written
communication to applicant and owner.)
Location of request (address): 12500 !West 32nd Ave Vbeat Ridge, CO.
To be filled out by staff-
V I Map Date received V- c $,��Rcceipt No. CO&V7,2, 00 Case No.
Comp Ilan Desig. Zoninj Quarter Secti 'L
Related Case No Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager_
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
Application subndual requirentents on reverse side
• :w�
THIS DEED, made this Novewber 4. 201
betty vm Janet L Heritage and The Becker Family Trust for the
Benefit of Max Becker
of the County of lefts and State of Colorado,
grantor(s), and Daniel J. N"Ills and Kristin M. WM
Bz�a
ft gmnior has executed this deed on the date sat
Harold Robert Leld, Trustee
1, Daniel Willis authorize Republic Garages, Inc. to submit administrative variance
paperwork on behalf of myself.
am=
PQ -.;.x 0'-�
wm=#�
A. The property would yield a return. It would be a safety factor for entry.
B. The approval would not alter the character • the locality. It makes sense for the garage to face
the west.
fl�r
Republic s
THIS CERTIFICATION WAS DONE WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A WILLEY/ -
CURRENT TITLE POLICY OR TITLE COMMITMENT, , I / RLS, INC. 11373 DECATUR COURT
THEREFORE, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF WESTMINSTER, CO 80234
RECORD ARE NOT A PART OF THIS CERTIFICATION.
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SURVEYING
PHONE 303 635 -1673 FAX 303 635 -1674
- CONCRETE WALKS
n
(80' R.O. W.)
C
x
FOUND CENTER 1/4
SECTION 29
3 1/4" CAP IN BOX
w
0
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT 12
MAPLE GROVE VILLAGE RESUB 1
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON
STATE OF COLORADO
12500 WEST 32ND AVENUE
U.E. - UTILITY EASEMENT
FLOOD INFORMATION:
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED OUTSIDE
THE LIMITS OF THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN,
ACCORDING TO THE FEMA /HUD FLOOD
INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO.
085079 0005 C. DATED FEB. 04, 1988..
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE
TO: BECKER FAMILY TRUST
I hereby certify that the improvements on the described parcel, except utility connections,
are entirely within the boundaries of said parcel, except as shown, that there are no
encroachments upon the described premises by improvements on any adjoi ning premises,
except as indicated, and that there is no evidence or sign of any easement crossing or
burdening any part of said parcel, except as noted. I further certify that this improvement
location certificate is not a land survey plat or improvement survey plat, and that it is not
to be relied upon for the establishment of fences, buildings or other future improvement
lines.
Based on the lack of monumentation found in the area a "BOUNDARY SURVEY"
is recommended for any future improvements.
Title Co. No. N/A
JOB NO. 11795 Date of Certificate: OCT. 13, 2011
WILLEY RLS, INC. 11373 DECATUR CT. WESTMINSTER, CO. 80234
CACompanvU_ and Projects 2005\117951dwq\BASE.dwq 10/15/2011 4:29:56 PM MDT
—� - -- 488.35' — --
WEST 32ND AVENUE
JOHN D- WILLEY, COLORADO L.S.#23528
L a n d U se. I)at a IF o, m
City of
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM
N �C)M)y g
DEvELONMENT
Case No. Date Received
Related Cases Case Planner
Mikulak
Case Description 15 ioo side yard setback variance
Name Name
- - ............
Phone (303j 781 9400
------------- - -- --- ---
Address 2 Denvet
532 S. Broadway City
j
State CO Zip
i Name !Daniel Willis W Name i
Phone j(720j 335 4557
Address City LVheat Ridge
State CO Zip
NameR epu6lic Garages Name
Phone (303j 906-1579
Address city Denver
.. ... ..... ..
Sta te co Zip M210-
.......... .. ........ ........ ......
. .....
Address '1 2500 S treet 1West32'ndAvenue
City 'W heat Ridge state Zip
Location Description
-- -
I'ProjectName
-- - -----
Pi - Q — District No
..............
Parcel No.
Qtr Section:
I District No.:
Pre•App Date Neighborhood Meeting Date
- --- - ------- -
---
App No :
. . ........
Review Type Review Body Review Date Disposition
.
Comments
Report
!Review .... . .....
. ... ......
..... .... ....
CITY OF WqEAT RIDGE
03/05/12 8:42 AN edbb
REPUBLIC GARAGES INC