Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-12-13City of heat 2t" �COMML)Nrry DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 9 ° ' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 October 15, 2012 Merrill Miller 8526 E. 163" Avenue Brighton, CO 80602 Dear Mr. Miller: Attached please find notice that your request for a 4-foot variance from the 15-foot side yard setback requirement and a 15-foot variance from the 30-foot front yard setback has been approved for the purpose of constructing a detached garage on property at 3650 Moore Street. Enclosed is a copy of the Approval of Variance and staff report. All variance approvals automatically expire within 180 days of the date approval unless a building permit for the variance is been obtained within such period of time. The expiration date for this variance approval is April 14, 2013. Please feel free to be in touch with any further questions. cc: Roger Santerarno (3650 Moore Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033) wwwA.wheatridge.co.us WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 3650 Moore Street referenced as Case No, WA -12 -1 / Landmark Garages; and WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 2b- 109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application; NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 4-foot variance fi the 15-foot side yard setback requirement and a 15-foot setback variance from the 30-foot front yard setback for the purpose of constructing a detached garage on property in the Residential-One (R-1) zone district (Case No. WA -1 -13 / Landmark Garages), is granted for property located at 3 650 Moore Street, based on the following findings of fact: With the following conditions: DAte Director A 41 Wh6atP.Ldge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Community Development Director DATE: October 15, 2012 CASE MANAGER: Lauren Mikulak CASE NO. & NAME: WA -12 -13 / Landmark Garages ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of (A) a 4 -foot variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement and (B) a 15 -foot variance from the 30 -foot front yard setback requirement for a detached garage on property located at 3650 Moore Street and zoned Residential -One (R -1) LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3650 Moore Street APPLICANT (S): OWNER (S): APPROXIMATE AREA: Landmark Garages Roger Santeramo 14,134 square feet (0.32 acres) PRESENT ZONING: Residential -One (R -1) PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Location Map Site Administrative Variance Case No. WA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make an administrative decision. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of two variances: a 4 -foot (27 %) variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement and a 15 -foot (50 %) variance from the 30 -foot front yard setback requirements for a detached garage on property at 3650 Moore Street. Section 26 -115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the standard. II. CASE ANALYSIS The applicant, Landmark Garages, is requesting the variance on behalf of the property owner of 3650 Moore Street. The variance is being requested so that the property owners may construct a 720 square foot (24'x30') detached garage on the south side of the property, adjacent to the existing driveway (Exhibit 1, Aerial). The subject property is zoned Residential -One (R -1), a zone district that provides for high quality, safe, quiet and stable low - density residential neighborhoods, and prohibits activities of any nature which are incompatible with the residential character. The property is surrounded by other parcels zoned R -1 with single family homes (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). The parcel has an area of 14,134 square feet and currently contains a one -story single - family home. Based on Jefferson County records, it was originally constructed in 1959 (Exhibit 3, Site Photos). The unusual shape of the property and the existence of mature landscaping substantiate the variance requests. The property is Lot 17 of Horace Heights Subdivision and was platted as a trapezoid. The southern lot line is nearly half the length of the northern lot line. Because the home is shifted to the north on the property, the only reasonable location for a garage is on the southern portion of the lot. The narrowness of the southern portion, however, makes it nearly impossible for a standard size garage to meet the R -1 setbacks (Exhibit 4, ate Plan). The property owner is also seeking to retain one of the few mature trees in the backyard. This tree is located off the southeast corner of the proposed garage and makes it difficult to meet the front setbacks without removing the tree. To minimize the visual impact of the new garage, the applicant has proposed new landscaping along the west fagade of the garage. In addition, there is about 8 feet of unbuilt right -of -way between the detached sidewalk and the front property line. This open space results in a perceived setback of about 23 feet and reduces the visual impact of the garage in the front setback. Administrative Variance Case No. WA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages The variance would result in an 11 -foot side yard setback and a 15 -foot front yard setback. The proposed garage would meet all other development standards including height and maximum size. The following table compares the required R -1 development standards with the actual and proposed conditions: R -1 Development Standards: Required Actual Lot Area 12,500 square feet min 14,134 sf Lot Width 100 feet (min 158 feet Single Family Home: Required Proposed Building Coverage 25% max 20.9% Height 15 feet max ±12 feet Front Setback west 30 feet min 15 feet Side Setback south 15 feet min 11 feet Rear Setback east 15 feet min 25 feet During the public notification period two letters of support were received from neighbors who live across the street. One neighbor noted in particular that they support the request so long as the five - gallon bushes are installed, as shown on the site plan. No objections were filed regarding the variance requests. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to approve an administrative variance, the Community Development Director must determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26- 115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria (Exhibit S, Letter o_fRequest). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. REQUEST A: Approval of a 4 -foot (27 %) variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement for a detached garage. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single - family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. Because the shape of the lot is not rectangular, the garage is skewed and only a small portion of the garage at the southwestern corner will encroach in the side setback. At the southeast corner, the garage is about 22 feet from the property line which exceeds the minimum requirement. Administrative Variance Case No. WA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages A grade change along Moore Street also reduces the impact of the variance on the property owner to the south. The garage will be adjacent to the neighbor's back yard which sits several feet higher than the subject lot (Exhibit 3, Site Photos). Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicant is proposing an investment in the property which would not be possible without the variance. The area between the home and the southern property line needs to accommodate a side setback, the proposed garage, and adequate area for a turning radius which combined necessitates a small encroachment. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. The unique hardship on the subject property relates to the shape of the lot and the fact that the south and west property lines are not perpendicular. The garage doors face north and are parallel with the driveway and home. Because of the unusual angle of the lot lines, a small triangular portion of the garage encroaches in the side setback. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The hardship described above was not created by the current property owner or any person currently having an interest in the property. The current owner purchased the property in September 2012, did not create the lot, and thus is not responsible for the existing conditions. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The side setback variance request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be Administrative Variance 4 Case No. WA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets. Nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets or impede the sight distance triangle. It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. The curvilinear design of Moore Street between W. 36` Avenue and W. 37' Place results in several lots with unusual shapes and angles. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable REQUEST B: Approval of a 15 -foot (50 %) variance from the 30 -foot front yard setback requirement for a detached garage. 1. The property, in question would not ,yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single- family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. While there are no structures on this block of Moore Street that encroach in the front setback, the perceived setback of the garage will be about 23 feet thanks to 8 feet of unbuilt right -of -way between the detached Administrative Variance Case No. WA -12 -13 / Landmark Garages sidewalk and the front property line. The applicant has proposed a split rail fence and landscaping between the property line and garage that will soften the visual impact of the garage being close to the street. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicant is proposing an investment in the property, which would not be possible without the variance. There are very few mature trees on the subject property and the applicant is requesting the front setback variance in an effort to save one tree in the backyard. If the garage was required to meet the 30 -foot front yard setback, the applicant would have to remove the tree and request a rear yard setback. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. The unique hardship on the subject property relates to the shape of the lot and the presence of mature landscaping. The lot is substantially narrower at the southern end, making it impossible for a standard size two -car garage to meet both the front and rear R -1 setbacks. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The hardship described above was not created by the current property owner or any person currently having an interest in the property. The current owner purchased the property in September 2012, did not create the lot, did not plant the mature tree, and thus is not responsible for the existing conditions. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The front setback variance request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be Administrative Variance Case No. WA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets. Nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets or impede the sight distance triangle. It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. There are no unique or unusual circumstances present in the neighborhood that are also present on the property and necessitate the need for a front setback variance. Most other lots in the neighborhood are wider than the subject lot. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends APPROVAL of a 4 -foot variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement and a 15 -foot variance from the 30 -foot front yard setback for a detached garage. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of the variances. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. The variances would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property that may not be possible without the variances. 3. The unusual shape of the lot results in a unique challenge that makes it difficult to construct a garage that meets the setback requirements. 4. The alleged hardships have not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 5. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. Administrative Variance Case No. If A -12 -13 /Landmark Garages 6. During the public notification period, two letters of support and no objections were received regarding the variance requests. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed garage be similar in character to the existing house, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall plant the five (5) shrubs along the west facade of the garage, as shown on the site plan. This landscaping shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the garage. If landscaping cannot be installed prior to C.O., a landscape escrow agreement with financial guarantee in the amount of 125% of the cost of the installation shall be required. Administrative Variance Case No. WA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL Administrative Variance Case No. WA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP ws 10560 amass, 10545 ' 'C' � 1 - ¢ y�q" 0 ?E30 03598 03685 _ y4 g C R -1 y 03045 • ?« , _ ti ly t 03E80 i I 03EE0 L) 036.''5 OaD 03580 J D3c00 0 =555 - 36TH AVE 0D670 0?F50 0 ?555 I, Administrative Variance Case No. WA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages EXHIBIT 3: SITE PHOTOS Administrative Variance Case No. WA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages A view of the subject property looking northeast. The proposed garage will be located in the dirt area that was used as a garden by the previous property owner. The arrow is pointing at the tree in the backyard which the owner is seeking to save. The property to the south (right) is several feet higher than the subject lot. EXHIBIT 4: SITE PLAN f 1 t o 1 ` r W ROW 1 1r� 1 \ a\ LUT 21 1 1 1 1 t Fpod 112" Bo \ 1 LOT 22 ' N ,0I 1A i + I 1 ,,rr 1 I S 1 I 1 1 .n I 1 •' 1 A • . • t - 24.s" • f COO , ! nyti. LOT 17 1 30 1 O.TCosat , • WaIO 1 � Li I v � LOT Ib Administrative Variance 12 Case No. IVA -12 -13 /Landmark Garages EXHIBIT 5: LETTER OF REQUEST 1 D'ATE 12 5 1 X 5,7 Z L 14 4� j Administrative Variance 13 Case No, 114-12-13 / Landmark Garagav "S r"A fle Administrative Variance 13 Case No, 114-12-13 / Landmark Garagav City of Wheat le �09 COMMUNriy DEVELOPJU_N�'Jr City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235,2846 F: 303,2352857 CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE October 1, 2012 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA-12-13, a request for approval of a 4-foot side yard setback variance from the 15-foot side yard setback requirement, and a 15-foot front yard setback variance from the 30-foot front yard setback requirements for a detached garage on property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located at 3650 Moore Street, The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adiacent ro per owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on September 10, 2012. WAl213,doc �� - Ir City of Wh6atl�� ie �g COMMUNi Ty DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.2352846 F: 301235.2857 Dear Property Owner: sme yarn, setoaci!;P�UFTF#777 me Y o-Yoot slue yar(I SCIDZICK requirement, anct a 15-foot front yard setback variance from the 30-foot front yard setback requirements for a detached garage on property zoned Residential-One located at 3650 Moore Street. I The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adjacent ro ger owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you would like to 6inm is concerning this request, please do so in c writing by 5:00 p.m s ;n7S ptemberl), 2012. Thank you. e WAl213,doc 4 -6 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us City of h6 at V V COMMUNiTy DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 301235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE October 1, 2012 This is to inform you of Case No. A- 12 -13, a request for approval of a 4-foot side yard setback variance from the 15-foot side yard setback requirement, and a 15-foot front yard setback variance from the 30-foot front yard setback requirements for a detached garage on property zoned Residential-One (R -1) and located at 3650 Moore Street. The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adjacent properly owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. ongeptembtr 10, 2012. Thank you. WAl213.doc wwwxi.wheatridge.co.us Geondon Properties � N 10005 West 34� Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Susan Motika 3651 Miller Court Marsha Hartley 68-3613 Pakanu Waikoloa, HI 967,�M Maine Desert Partners 120 Exchange Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 ffnitchell Movet 3645 Moore Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Mildred Tucker 3625 Moore Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 John Packer Post Office Box 2013 Littleton, Colorado 80161 ?012 1010 0001 ?2?? 2?58 7012 1010 0001 7277 2765 r012 1010 0001 7277 2826 701 1010 0001 7277 2772 7012 1010 0001 7277 2802 LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29' Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 (Plcas,c print or type all information) Applicant Address 3 57 -Z_, A ( ? f"hone 3 * City f 4"Al '7 State < Zip_ _5_4­0 2— Fax_ Owner z eiz. v— Address Phoney)4 35 City to x State C" cl� Zip Fax Contact M t Address Phone.3e,3 City ilea State Zip 4 e- Fax _--L __ 9 4P (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional 'infiormation when necessary, post public hearing signs. will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall he responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner) Location of request (address). 6� J5 0 Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Application subinittal requirements on reverse side 0 Change of zone or zone conditions 13 Special Use Permit 0 Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) 0 Consolidation Plat 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) 0 Flood Plain Special Exception 0 Site Plan approval 0 Temporary Use, Building, Sign 0 Lot Line Adjustment 0 Concept Plan approval A Variance/Waiver (ftorn Section 0 Planned Building Group 0 Right of Way Vacation 0 Other: Detailed description of request: /'i> e 51- 7- 4A 8526 East 163 Brighton, CO 80602 303-944-4091 C7;jl1ZY 45 4e- ;4--7-- DATE,,/ By After Recording Return to- Roger Santeramo 3650 Moore Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 0-0 CIO P, By Phil Dudiak, anaging her a m ..... "Istv &14 611ultut;' ujGjj " C114 anu asbigns forever, ait me real Property together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Jefferson, State of COLORADO described as follows: Lot 17, Horace Heights Subdivision, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, By Phil udisk, 0 By Phil Dudisk, anaging her Um I ---- Development, LLP, By Phil Dudiak, Managing Member. Witness my hand and official seal. j Notat T ic M V� — y o mission expires: ESCROW NO, 598-HO346585-027.TM7 LANDMARK GARAGES, INC 8526 East 163 d Avenue Brighton, CO 80602 303-944-4091 GARAGE DESIGN DATE BY W City of ic i� 9 `� W h6a 1 City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W, 2 '' ve. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 -8001 P: 301235.2846 F: 303.2351857 Information to be submitted and accepted with variance applications Plan: 1. Completed, notarized application 2. lee (-k , _____3. Proof of ownership (deed) - x prop y...o x r) — 5. Written request including justification for this request as responses to the evaluation criteria 6. Survey or Improvement Location Certificate for the property, 7. Proposed building elevations As aplVicant f `err this Irroiect, I hereby ensure that all (#'the above requirements have been includled With this .submittal. 1 fiillj} n lerstand that if anj one o0he items listed on this checklist has been excluded the documents will NOT be distributed,fcrr C io review. In addition, I understand that in the event any revisions need to be made after the second (_rd) full revieu I will be subject to the applicable resubrnittal fire. Signature. bate: Name ( e,.. Rev. 4/10 Phone: 3 41 wwwxirw°heatridt exams RjLpowr LAND SURVEYING 5460 WARo Raw • SUITE 160 ARvwA. CowRAOO 80002 43001420.4788 IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE J I I 1 / J 1 1 1 1 1 ;rs 1 1 t 1 1 t LOT 20 t 1 1 _ t _ t I 1 Food M' Ro4W cap ` t t 1 1 _\ at LOT 21 \ \ 1 t 1 Ford 1J2' ow -- 1 _ t 1 t LOT 22 ` 1 DATE 09/19/2012 FEE S170.00 JOB# 12 -449 CUEM COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ADDREss 3650 MORE STREET NAmE ROGER SANTBRAJ40 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER CLIENT) LOT 17 , HORACE HEIGHTS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 6 r." ts samw on Scale: 1"=3w ,�. m � M a m&d Ibr Yretne Loau" orbwmv mft LOT It q.0 - -- v concoft r � 1 ' 1p ....�. r • r • r f ,• LOT 17 it re � o I 30 0.7 comcmw wan • - a ov!S 1 6517 I I t J I I 1 I 3 ©. i 1 1 1 1 I \ + t L07 16 M,T — TOE GIX GE GVTS 8526 East 163 Avenue Brighton, CO 80602 (303) 944-4091 Job Address-, 36,5 Meae No L e- *Pw I � 5WIT CY f CO - V& G-AMGE GVTS 8526 East 163 Brighton, CO 80602 (303) 944-4091 Job Address.- 3 6G 6400 Homeowner: SAAJ T � 0 Roof Covedu - TA A Underlaym=t( 15 sticaung A AAUr,c VV4.LU 4UU4,L W LU Size and spa4ng of wall or collar ties. z 15, 4 w r l � s N w � i " m y 0 L r A r w * a w * • w e w " w w w " + I Qu w w • • • w w i w r t " i f" • " w • • r w r p " i r • w , r • i " w • " • w " w " • • i t. w • e r w • w w "Y • i r i tt�o mm l N > Z � 1 .� N f k l m y 0 L r A z — D N 0 p C 1 I Qu r p " tt�o mm Nm* Name .Ft rtsaa -�7 Addren EoelQdAv wm city BogNon State co zip -- em N&m DOW Nme phom � 902.3516 Aftes, 3651 Ad - we Sheet c� State co­� z p t ol)m .. ... .. .. Name N" _mom Ad&eu Ea&W6,IdAve" ck state ' co Aften So,* cky 8000A State .co Zip ftoiect Nam* — dGo Paicel No, Sectim Di*ONo,� fTrr Phr=. Daze Noigilv&mf MeelkV Date AppNo Date Dq)Dntm CITY Of WHEAT RIDGE 10/01/12 9:83 AN cdba --�, Lan d*aTk Garages RECEIPT ND:CDA@07743 AMOUNT FMSD ZONING APPLICATION F 208.00 ZONE PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT CK 410 208.90 TOTAL 200.80 --------------- ---l" ---------- -- -------