The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3325 Jay StreetFrom: no-reolv(alci.wheatridae.m. us To: CommDev Pets Subject: Online Form Submittal: Sewer or Water Line Repair Permit Application Date: Tuesday, December 7, 20213:13:29 PM Sewer or Water Line Repair Permit Application This application is exclusively for SEWER OR WATER LINE REPAIR - IN YARD Your Permit will be emailed to the email address provided below once it is processed. THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PERMIT. DO NOT BEGIN WORK UNTIL PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. Right of Way permits must be applied for with the Public Works Department. Is this application for Yes sewer line or water line repair - in yard only? PROPERTY INFORMATION Is this Residential or Residential Commercial? Property Address 3325 JAY STREET, WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 Property Owner Name JOHN DELISA Property Owner Phone 303-561-1739 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123- 4567) Property Owner Email JD261@HOTMAIL.COM Address Attach City of Wheat Electronic -Payment -Form Ddf Ridge Electronic Payment Form - "DO NOT ATTACH A PICTURE OF A CREDIT CARD" CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Business AAA SERVICE PLUMBING LLC Name Contractor's License 017953 Number (This is a 5 or 6 digit number for the City of Wheat Ridge) Contractor Phone 303-313-3333 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123- 4567) Contractor Email EMMA@AAATODAY.COM Address Retype Contractor EMMA@AAATODAY.COM Email Address DESCRIPTION OF WORK Is this a sewer line or sewer Line water line repair? Length of repair 54' Location of repair (backyard, frontyard, etc) Provide additional details including installation of clean - o uts. FRONT YARD 6-9' deep + cleanouts Project Value (contract 8750 value or cost of ALL materials and labor) SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I assume full Yes responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application. I understand that work Yes may not begin on this property until a permit has been issued and posted on the property. I certify that I have Yes been authorized by the legal owner of the property to submit this application and to perform the work described above. I attest that everything Yes stated in this application is true and correct and that falsifying information in this application is an act of fraud and may be punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. Person Applying for EMMA DUGGAN Permit Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. INSP �In Inspections will not's Call by 3:00 PM INSPECTOR Ml ECTION RECORD _ ae made unless this card is posted on the bt to receive inspection the following business IST SIGN ALL SPACES PERTAINING TO THIS iilding site ay. ') Gam` JOB FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS DATE INSPECTOR '.. INITIALS COMMENTS: Footings /Caissons Electrical Service Stemwall -! (CEG) Concrete Encased Ground Rough Plumbing L Reinforcing or Monolithic al :Rough Mechanical t PINSPECTIONS Weatherproof / French Drain SIGNED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING Framing ainage FOR PLANNING & ZONING, FIRE AND PUB LICE WORKS Parking & Landscaping ALLED AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTIONS. - "�Ud k:_ AiLL IlkN1S MUST AE, COMP,LETED.AND -AP .PROVED BYPLANNING AND -ZONING -BUILDINGAND- PUBLIC WORKS - BEFORE A -- '.CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS:ISSUED. FINAL INSPECTION BY THE BUILDING DIVISION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AUTHORIZATION OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NOR PERMISSION FOR OCCUPANCY. Sewe; Service Lines Insulation Water Service Lines Drywall Screw CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR )round) Iround) Dund) DO N NO CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED N o POUR FLOOR UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED Sheathing.; :Lath / Wall tie Mid Roof f Electrical Service `Rough Electric Rough Plumbing L Gas Piping al :Rough Mechanical t PINSPECTIONS ABOVE INSPECTIONS TO BE SIGNED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING Framing ainage FOR PLANNING & ZONING, FIRE AND PUB LICE WORKS Parking & Landscaping ALLED AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTIONS. - "�Ud k:_ AiLL IlkN1S MUST AE, COMP,LETED.AND -AP .PROVED BYPLANNING AND -ZONING -BUILDINGAND- PUBLIC WORKS - BEFORE A -- '.CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS:ISSUED. FINAL INSPECTION BY THE BUILDING DIVISION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AUTHORIZATION OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NOR PERMISSION FOR OCCUPANCY. Insulation Drywall Screw FINALS ZR.O.W& L al t PINSPECTIONS ent ainage FOR PLANNING & ZONING, FIRE AND PUB LICE WORKS Parking & Landscaping ALLED AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTIONS. - "�Ud k:_ AiLL IlkN1S MUST AE, COMP,LETED.AND -AP .PROVED BYPLANNING AND -ZONING -BUILDINGAND- PUBLIC WORKS - BEFORE A -- '.CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS:ISSUED. FINAL INSPECTION BY THE BUILDING DIVISION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AUTHORIZATION OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NOR PERMISSION FOR OCCUPANCY. OCCUPANCY NOT PERMITTED UNTIL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED PROTECT THIS CARD FROM THE WEATHER ♦ 16 Al i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division r (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax IN41PECCTIO~N NOTICE Inspection Type: oo i ~l~tPo _ Job Address: Permit Number: C`~ .n r ❑ No one available for inspection: Time A PM Re-Inspection required: Yes ) "When corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 gg + 1' j Date: t Inspector: i,DLj DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division 'or r4000 (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTI NOTICE Inspection Type: V\.-, J~ress: Tx;)-~ ~~a a < Per( i ~ tuber: Ct3~ {a. 1\d ❑ No one available for inspection: Time Ar- Re-Inspection required: Yes Ge~ "When corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 t r Date: Inspector: O NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE City of Wheat Ridge r4000or I Residential Roofing PERMIT - 094042 PERMIT NO: 094042 ISSUED:' 11/12/2009 JOB ADDRESS: 3325 JAY ST EXPIRES: 05/11/2010 DESCRIPTION: Reroof'28 sqs CONTACTS owner 303/232-7407 Diane William SUB 303/670-3048 Terry Harper 01-8383 Harper Services **PARCEL INFO ZONE.. CODE: - UA USE: UA SUBDIVISION: 0490 BLOCK/LOT#: 0/ FEE SUMMARY .ESTIMATED -PROJECT. VALUATION: 8,500.00 FEES Permit Fee'. 217.50 Total Valuation .00 Use Tax 153.00 TOTAL 370.50 Conditions: 6 nail installation& mid roof inspection required. Board sheathing spaced more thana 1/2 of an inch apart requires plywood overlay on entire roof. Ice and water shield. required from eave edge to 2' inside exterior walls. ***Contractor/Property owner shallprovide.` ladder(s) secured in place for inpsections.. Subject to field inspection.. I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, :easements. or restrictions of record; .e that all measurements -shown, .:and allegations made are. accurate;. that I-have read and agree to abide. by all conditions printed on this application and that I.assume full. responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code -(I.B.C). and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this perms Plans subject to field inspection. r2- 0 Signature of conwner date 1 This permit was issued in accordance with the. provisions set forth in your application and is subject to the laws of the state of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Codes of Wheat `Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the city.' 2. This permit shall expire 180 days from the issue date. Requests for an extension must be received :prior to expiration date. An extension maybe granted. at the discretion of the Building Official. 3. If this permit expires, ;a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifications and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes have been or if suspension or abandonment. exceeds one (1) year,full fees 'shall be.. paid for a-new permit. 1. No. work of any manner shall be done that will change the natural flow of water causing a drainage problem. Contractor shall notify the Building Inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspection card before proceeding with successive phases of the job. The. issuance of a permit:. or the approval of drawings and. specifications shall: not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, any violation of the provisions of the building codes or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. All. plan r ie 's subject to field inspections. 1111/'~ >ignatur f Vef Building Official date CNSPE'TION REQUEST LINE: (303)234-5933 BUILDING OFFICE:: (303)235-2855 ZEQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 3PM ANY BUSINESSDAY FOR INSPECTION THE 'FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. OF WnegTp City of Wheat Ridge Building Division Date: 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 _ Office: 303-235-2855 * Fax: 303-237-8929 Plan cOrorzro° Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Permit Building Permit Application Property Address73~~ y Property Owner (please print): t & „t e W', ('A K Phone: 3a3 Z 3z -7ya7 Mailing Address: (if different than property address) Address: S V11 City, State, Zip: Contractor: env_ y c e -3 Contractor License Phone: -,703 - k749 /9-72 Sub Contractors: Electrical City License Plumbing City License Mechanical City License Company: Company Company: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Approval: Approval: Approval: Use of space (description): Q-.e_C0A- Construction Value: g „~GY) Description of work: ` (as calculated per the Building atuation Data sheet) Plan Review (due at time of submittal): $ Sq. Ft.lL.Ft added: Squares BTU's Gallons Amps OWNERICONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. CIRLCE ONE:: (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) or PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of (OWNER) (CONTRATOR) PRINT NAME: _ ~ C<Y4 ~c SIGNATURE: Date: / Z U City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum -'-.~" WHEAl' 1>, '-- 0 - '" u "' COe OR"'P TO: Nick Fisher, APCO Supervisor Jack Hurst, Police Chief Alan White, Community Development Director Randy Young, City Manager Darin Morgan CBO, Codes Administrator ~~ FROM: ~BJECT: 3325 Jay Street - Basement Rental, Case #0200319833 DATE: September 30, 2003 Per your request I investigated the above address regarding whether a rental unit is allowed, The address is zoned R-2 (two family) and the lot does meet the minimum lot standards of 12000 sq ft and 100 feet of frontage to allow the basement to be used as a separate living unit If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. WHEAT RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT - NARRATIVES FOR CASE 0200319833 Date 09/30/2003 Page 1 26-603 ZONING VIOLATION (M) SUPP. REPORT #IR 09/25/2003 N FISHER ON 092503 I SPOKE WITH C1 JANICE REEVES ON THE PHONE. REEVES TOLD ME THAT SHE HAD MAD A WEED COMPLAINT AND THAT RECORDS HAD TOLD HER NO REPORT EXISTED ON THE CASE. REEVES HAD LEFT ME A MESSAGE ADVISING THAT THE ADDRESS OF THE COMPLAINT WAS 3225 JAY ST. I HAD CHECKED FOR REPORTS UNDER THAT ADDRESS AND HAD NOT FOUND A REPORT. I CHECKED FOR REPORTS UNDER REEVES NAME AND FOUND TWO REPORTS NEITHER WHICH WERE RELATED TO WEEDS. I CHECKED UNDER 3325 JAY ST AND FOUND THE REPORT REEVES WAS REFERRING TO CR# 03- 14347. I ASKED REEVES WHEN SHE MADE THE WEED REPORT BECAUSE THIS REPORT WAS FOR A ZONING VIOLATION. REEVES TOLD ME IT WAS 071303 WHICH COINCIDED WITH THIS REPORT. I READ THE REPORT TO REEVES AND ADVISED REEVES THAT THE ONLY CODE VIOLATION THAT OFFICER COOK HAD OBSERVED WAS PARKING ON AN UNAPPROVED SURFACE. I ADVISED REEVES THAT OFFICER COOK FOUND THE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE ON 072003. I ASKED REEVES IF THERE WERE ANY CODE ISSUES CURRENTLY WITH THE PROPERTY AT 3325 JAY ST AND REEVES TOLD ME THAT OFFICER COOK AND OFFICER HAGERMAN TOLD HER THAT THE WEEDS WERE XERISCAPE PLANTS. I GAVE REEVES THE CASE REPORT NUMBER SO SHE COULD OBTAIN THE REPORT FROM RECORDS. REEVES TOLD ME THAT SHE WOULD GET A COPY OF THE REPORT. A FEW HOURS LATER CHIEF HURST ASKED ME TO MEET HIM. I MET WITH CHIEF HURST WHO ADVISED ME THAT REEVES HAD CONTACTED HIM ABOUT CODE VIOLATIONS AT 3325 JAY ST. I RELAYED THE INFORMATION THAT I HAD DISCUSSED WITH REEVES. THE CHIEF TOLD ME THAT REEVES MADE THE FOLLOWING COMPLAINT TO HIM AND ASKED THAT I INVESTIGATE THE COMPLAINT: WEEDS OR PLANTS CAUSING A SIGHT TRIANGLE PROBLEM A FENCE ISSUE ON THE PROPERTY LINE PARKING ON AN APPROVED SURFACE, A VEHICLE IS CURRENTLY BEING PARKED ON BRICKS MAKING TWO LINES FOR THE TIRES TO REST ON. THE CHIEF ASKED THAT I FORWARD THIS ISSUE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO DETERMINE IF THE BRICKS WERE AN APPROVED SURFACE. THE CHIEF ALSO TOLD ME THAT REEVES COMPLAINED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER WAS RENTING OUT THE BASEMENT. THE CHIEF REQUESTED THAT I ALSO DOCUMENT THIS AND FORWARD IT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR FOLLOW UP. I RESPONDED TO THE RESIDENCE AND OBSERVED THE TWO AREAS THAT WERE BEING REPORTED AS A SIGHT TRIANGLE PROBLEM. I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THIS PROPERTY FROM PREVIOUS COMPLAINTS AND WAS AWARE THAT A CITY HORTICULTURIST HAD BEEN OUT IN JULY OF 2002 AND DETERMINED THAT THE PLANTS WERE XERISCAPE PLANTS AND ONLY IDENTIFIED TWO PLANTS THAT WERE NOXIOUS WEEDS. THE PROPERTY OWNER REMOVED THOSE PLANTS AND WAS IN COMPLIANCE. (SEE CASE # 02-11277) I CONTACTED THE CITY ARBORIST BILL CASSEL TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AS A SIGHT TRIANGLE ISSUE. I CONTACTED REEVES AT 3301 JAY ST. REEVES ASKED IF SHE COULD HAVE A WITNESS PRESENT DURING OUR CONVERSATION WHICH I ADVISED REEVES WAS FINE WITH ME. REEVES CONTACTED W1 ROSE CERRONE A NEIGHBOR WHO LIVES AT 3310 JAY ST. CERRONE CAME ACROSS THE STREET. I ASKED REEVES TO START AT THE BEGINNING AND TELL ME WHAT HER COMPLAINT WAS ABOUT. REEVES TOLD ME THAT HER DAUGHTER HAS HAD SEVERAL NEAR MISSES FROM PULLING OUT OF THEIR DRIVEWAY IN THE CAR AND NOT BEING ABLE TO SEE OVER THE PLANTS AT 3325 JAY ST. REEVES ALSO TOLD ME THAT SHE WAS UPSET BECAUSE THE PROPERTY OWNER AT 3325 JAY ST WAS ALLOWED BY THE CITY TO ERECT A FENCE ALL THE WAY TO THE STREET WITHOUT GETTING A PERMIT AND THAT SHE WAS TOLD THAT THE COULD ONLY BUILD A FENCE TO A CERTAIN DISTANCE AWAY FROM THE STREET. REEVES TOLD ME THAT SHE HAD TRIED TO GET A REPORT REGARDING THE FENCE ISSUE FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUT THAT A MALE WHO SHE DESCRIBED AS DARK HAIRED HAD TOLD HER THERE WAS NO REPORT. I ASKED REEVES IF THE MALE HAD A GOATEE AND SHE TOLD ME HE DID. I ADVISED REEVES I WOULD CHECK WITH DARIN MORGAN WHO SHE DESCRIBED AND SEE IF THERE WAS A REPORT AVAILABLE ON THE FENCE ISSUE. I ASKED REEVES IF THERE WAS ANY ISSUE WITH THE PARKING SURFACE NEXT DOOR AND REEVES TOLD ME THERE WAS NOT. AT THIS TIME BILL CASSEL ARRIVED AND WE DISCUSSED THE SIGHT TRIANGLE ISSUES. CASSEL ADVISED REEVES THAT HER PROPERTY WAS IN VIOLATION AND THAT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HER PROPERTY THAT TECHNICALLY SHE WOULD HAVE TO REMOVE ASPEN TREES TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE. THIS CAUSED REEVES TO BECOME EXTREMELY UPSET. REEVES REPEATEDLY MADE THE COMMENT THAT SHE WAS GOING TO CONTACT HER LAWYER AND SUE THE CITY. I ASKED CASSEL TO MEASURE THE PLANTS AT 3325 JAY ST WHILE I SPOKE WITH REEVES AND TRIED TO CALM HER DOWN AND ASSURE HER THAT I WAS TRYING TO RESPOND TO HER COMPLAINTS. CASSEL RETURNED AND TOLD US THAT THE PLANTS WERE 45 INCHES AND BY CODE SHOULD BE 42 INCHES AND WERE IN VIOLATION. ASKED CASSEL IF HE WOULD BE ENFORCING THE VIOLATION AND HE TOLD ME THAT CINDY HAGERMAN WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WAS NOW ENFORCING SIGHT TRIANGLE ISSUES. I ASKED CASSEL TO FORWARD ME A COPY OF HIS REPORT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. CASSEL TOLD ME HE WOULD HAVE A COPY TO ME BY TOMORROW 092603. REEVES WAS STILL UPSET AND TOLD ME THAT SHE HAD RECEIVED A WARNING NOTICE FOR BLOWING GRASS OUT IN THE STREET. REEVES REQUESTED THAT OUR DEPARTMENT WRITE HER A TICKET THE NEXT TIME SHE BLEW GRASS IN THE STREET SO SHE COULD Date Printed 09/30/2003 Time Printed 07: 17:33 Page 1 Case Number 200319833 WHEAT RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT - NARRATIVES FOR CASE 0200319833 Date 09/30/2003 Page 2 GO TO COURT. I ADVISED REEVES THAT IF SOMEONE CALLED IN TO COMPLAIN ABOUT IT THAT WE WOULD ISSUE A SUMMONS TO HER, OR SHE COULD CALL THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEN SHE WAS BLOWING GRASS IN THE STREET AND WE COULD RESPOND AND ISSUE A SUMMONS. I TOLD REEVES THAT I WOULD COMPILE ALL THE REPORTS FOR HER AND THAT THEY WOULD BE AVAILABLE SOMETIME ON 092903. I ADVISED REEVES THAT THERE WERE APPROXIMATELY FOUR REPORTS THAT I KNEW OF REGARDING CODE COMPLAINTS AND THESE REPORTS COVERED THREE YEARS.( CR#'S 03-14347, 02-14357, 03-11277 AND 01-24295). I RETURNED TO THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING AND CONTACTED DARIN MORGAN THE CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR. I ASKED DARIN IF HE KNEW OF ANY REPORTS RELATING TO A FENCE ISSUE AT 3325 JAY ST. MORGAN TOLD ME THAT REEVES HAD CONTACTED HIM ON 092403 AND THAT HE WAS PREPARING A MEMO FOR ALAN WHITE THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. I ASKED MORGAN IF HE WOULD PROVIDE A COPY OF HIS MEMO AND REPORT TO ME. I ADVISED MORGAN THAT A SIGHT TRIANGLE COMPLAINT WAS BEING MADE AND THAT BILL CASSEL WOULD BE PROVIDING ME A COPY OF THE REPORT. MORGAN TOLD ME THAT THERE IS NO VIOLATION IF THE SIGHT TRIANGLE PROBLEM IS ON A LOCAL STREET. MORGAN PROVIDE ME WITH A FENCE HEIGHT STANDARDS HANDOUT AND ADVISED ME THAT CASSEL WAS INCORRECT THAT A VIOLATION EXISTED FOR THE DRIVEWAY AREAS OF THE PROPERTIES. A COPY OF THIS REPORT WILL BE FORWARDED TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REGARDING THE MATERIALS USED FOR THE PARKING SURFACE ISSUE AND THE RENTAL OF THE BASEMENT. SUBMITTED BY: N. FISHER 901A 26-603 ZONING VIOLATION (M) SUPP. REPORT #1 09/29/2003 N FISHER THE PREVIOUS CASE REPORTS THAT I LISTED IN THE IR REPORT SHOULD HAVE BEEN 03-14347, 02-14357, 02-11277 AND 01-24295. SUBMITTED BY: N. FISHER 901A 26-603 ZONING VIOLATION (M) SUPP. REPORT #2 09/30/2003 N FISHER ON 093003 I FORWARDED A COPY OF THIS REPORT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REGARDING THE ISSUES OF IF THE BRICK PAVERS ARE CONSIDERED AN APPROVED PARKING SURFACE AND THE COMPLAINT THAT THE BASEMENT IS BEING RENTED OUT AT 3325 JAY ST. SUBMITTED BY: N. FISHER 901A Case Number 200319833 Date Printed 09/30/2003 Time Printed 07:17:33 Page 2 City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum -'-~' 'NHE4r 1', '- 0 - '" U r'l COLOR/>SP TO: Alan White, Community Development Director FROM: Darin Morgan CBO, Codes Administrator fPrr SUBJECT: 3325 Jay Street - Fence 1 Landscape features DATE: September 25, 2003 D~ September 2~, 2003, approx. 12:00 noon 1 spoke with a lady regarding a fence 1 landscape feature located a the SE comer of 3325 Jay Street. Informed her that a right-of-way and building permit were issued on July 25,2003. She asked if she could build a 6 foot fence all the way to the edge ofthe street, I informed her she would be required to submit a site plan showing the location, size and type of fence to be installed. I also indicated a right-of-way permit would be would be required to be submitted for approval by the Public Works Department. Karen Scott informed her of the separate insurance requirements needing to be met when and ifthe ROW permit was approved. She asked what would happen if she put the fence up without a permit and was told we would issue a stop work order and possibly impose our triple fee penalty ifwarranted by myself. I indicated to her the triple fee penalty usually is applied to contractors who know they need a permit and do not, and for homeowners who have been told they need a permit and disregard the information, She also asked about a warning notice she received from APCO regarding blowing lawn debris into the street ROW. I showed her the code section and confirmed this was a violation. She asked if she continued would she receive a summons, I informed her it was possible and she would need to talk with APCO. She also asked how APCO handles lawn companies who do the same thing (blow debris into the street) and is APCO issues warnings to those people, I informed her these are typically handled on a complaint basis and she indicated she would log a complaint. The End '. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTION LINE - (303-234-5933) CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303-235-2855) Building Permit Number: 15831 Date: 7/25/2003 Property Owner: DIANE WILLIAN Property Address: 3325 JAY ST Contractor License No. : Company: Phone: 232-7407 Phone: OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances. rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application, and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (U.B.C.) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge ordinances, for work under this permit. (OWNER)(CONTRACTOR) SIGNED~~CJ ,'/1,; a.- DATE 0 9 O)G J Total: $7.00 $30.55 $0.00 $0.14 $30.69 Construction Value: Permit Fee: Plan Review Fee: Use Tax: Use: Description: ONE PIECE CEDAR LATH DIVIDER FRAMED - 31" TALL 6'6" BACK FROM STREET :"\M 1 ",1(4,'~\ BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY tmll'lft~Co' 'mMllIi SIC Sq. Ft ,. '. ...m. Approval MP OK. 7/23/03 Zoning R-2 Ownerl ~Iease ~ote: f,%pil<!l~ lines and C:=r!s ,:sponslble for locating property 7/25/03, OK a roved Ian ctmg l~provcmer.ts ac.:on;ing to the Approval BG Th~ City it and req~Ired developlTICilt ',tandi.,d, j>"lil~mm~ptlil submilt d no,~sponslble fur ;naccumIe ;n!"rtlV ,'. e WI In the plan sel and any ,.,' errors rcsulti fr' . COL'I<f..IC'kll'1 Approval ng om maecuruk innY'1: ~: ,,',:! Occupancy: Walls Roof: Stories Residential Units Electrical License No : Company: Plumbing License No : Company: Mechanical License No : Company: Expiration Date: Approval: Expiration Date: Approval: Expiration Date: Approval: (1) This permit was issued in accordance with the provisions set forth in yopur application and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Code of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the City. (2) This permit shall expire if (A) the work authorized is nol commenced within sixty (60) days from issue date or (B) the building authorized is suspended or abandoned fOf a period of 120 days. (3) If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifications and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes are made or if suspension or abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full fees shall be paid for a new permit. (4) No work of any manner shall be done that will change the natural flow of water causing a drainage problem. (5) Contractor shall notify the Building Inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspection card before proceediing with successive phases of the job. (6) The is ance of a permit or the approval of drawings and specifications shall not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, any violation of the ro io s of t e b . 'ng codes or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. spector Please sign Terms and Conditions on reverse side of page. 3s 2..5' J,,~ CERTIFICATE ST. OF SURVEY 6001 BURDICK WEST 16TH ENGINEERING COMPANY, IN C, AVE., LAKEWOOD, COLORADO, 80214 P"!-'p :zY~":r.P S=r Pin .,. 07.0 :Tnsic7(2, . C).g' lor mer Iy 2 I \"0 /4~, S '(~)F<>U~ 5#" 0.8 . ::I/7:>n P,P2-- Prouty Bro~ EngineerIng Co 303-232- 1692 agO td c. ~. <,.,. ~. ?J ~ Z.8.c;,' , I "11 ~I I ~J'O~',Il'ZO ':!.- 45~ '- _ I I&) ~ < /\' ~I ~ ~ 'B" 1- S,) I . (;? ,!F K/a!/ ~iY'1 aM rJ " o ,'lP .AI , vJ 00': ~}l!1n; ~ ~. 47.,\ \(\ / .514) 3 ~ ~ Br/cJG I ~ I/) v/ ~., G-ord tU7 \3 LaveJ I ~ , 3525Jo4' ~ 345' ~~r' ~ . <J <J ~ " Soo(e-, /"~~' : ~ Arrza;/~S' i~ - t -- 'LFancta , ). /ne- ~ ~ I d~' az t.d 5 ~o -~-- -<S>. '-0" so' , ----< /4t:J,g' Found .3/4" I XrO/7 A;cxz, -4 ~SzT~i; -~1 }'!.-l.~ b,v'J~~ 3/" HI! "7" I~"$, (,'r." "~d<.. fr~.... Sf,ceT ," ''''Slp,,- SIl)<- f"'l"'r13 ~e"'.,..\"<- ".c.. j ill n'Ly i_'t.'r: it',: tl1d1 th, d(C():'ii)d;I'.::r:~: C,:"-t I r ~('.lt\' (; ::U!\'\",: I:; d t~\I(' ,p\li ,1"'.'11,: li('lillldtlC.'l; 'j; .\ !i,'l(~ '-,llJ-....". ('(_;;_l!'Ll~"(: "n ..\\1:'1:-;\ 2tJ, lqH~ Ur.tl,'r ;;i\! di r\'c:t \()1~ ,,-u.d ~",,\It1('t'vl:-)i(jrl ]!)!:,d lli <<,,' ;,,: i : :i' I~;rl',:,it le;j ()i d~\d the ijllIJn)\I('r\\l~llt:--; !t)(.:,di.'d or; th(' il)! ll_J\.'i!1'1 L~l':.:;(.r t:,,"(J ,"ll-)f1'.':"\-\": : .! (;,\, ~, !) 1 :; ( , ::; l 1" I' I \ )>; : " i ~ ~ >:' :.\ i)! ) i , i \ ' , ); I ,'., I. . i :,. I \ ;: I ~ t ,!, ie, ~/ )~ ~'T/(/iC> ", ,"", . . . , ' . ..",' ," - 1 .lll' !,I "'. '",,) ,] c... I . : '" d,,!<" :'" ,II. ",) I)