Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP-97-3~ ~ The Cify of ~Wheat ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION ~Rid e Department of Planning and Development g 7500 West 24th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 237-6944 Applicant Applewood Baptist Church Address 11220 W. 32nd Avenue Phone 232-9575 Ovaner " Address " Phone " Location of request 11225 W. 32nd Avenue Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed belora which pertain to your request.) ^ Change of zone or zone conditions _ Site development plan approval ~ Special use permit ~ Conditional use permit Temporary use/building permit ~ Minor subdivision Subdivision 8 Preliminary Final ^ ~* See attached procedural guide for speci£ic requirements. Detailed Description o£ request Construction of one (1~ basefield field and vollevball courts. - - _.. .,.-.. . __- . _ ~~~~~ ~ ^, ~ Variance/Waiver ~ Nonconforming use change = Flood plain special exception Interpretation of code m Zone Iine modifioation Public Improvement Exception Street vacation _ Miscellaneous plat _ Solid waste landfill/ mineral extraction permit ^ Other List,all persons and companies who hold an interest in the described property, as owner, mortgagee, lessee, optionee, etc. NAME ADDRESS PHONE real I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this appiication, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-oP-attorney £rom the owner which approved of this act~ on his behalf. 53gnature of Applicant ~,i~/,/ JjjQj~~~ Subscr~bed and sworn to me this ~ day of //~ii~ , 19 grJ t ~/,~~~~ ~~,~~ , Notary PE~lic ~ SEAL PnyGommission Expires CJn ~^"2~?ltlt My commission expires Date Received 4-) ~- R~ Receipt No. (~~3JZ.Ry~ Case No. • ,~, ~x~~B~ r ~,8 ~ APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH 11220 West 32nd Avenue Lakewood, CO 80033 April 14, 1997 Meredith Reckert Plannuig Department City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 Re: Applewood Baptist Church - Conditional Use Permit Dear Ms. Reckert: Please find enclosed our AdministraGve Process Application along with a check for the $100 filing fee. As a result of our neighborhood meeting on April 10, 1997 and the comments and concerns that were expressed at that meeting, we would like to offer the following response to those comments: L Wi11 there be supervision by the church when the fields are in use? The church plans to have a church representative present at all times in which the fields are being utilized. 2. Will fliere be established times for the fields to be used? The baseball feld will not be used beyond 9:0~ PM during the surnmer (sunset year round) and the volley ball pits beyond 10:00 PM. All times for use will be posted at the fields. The field and pits will not be used during service times. Very limited use of the field and pits will occur during the months of October to March. 3. Will there be any sound buffering? It is not in our plan at this time; however, we would be willing to entertain any suggestions from City staff. 4. Will there be timers on the lights for the volley ball pits? Yes! They will be set to ttun off no later than 10:00 PM. All times will be posted on the pits. 5. Will there be emergency access to the fields? Yes. We intend to install a gravel path for pedestrians which can also be used by emergency vehicles. It would be barricadad in such a way to prevent any unauthorized use by other vehicles. ~ ~ 6. Will there be restroom facilities available to those using the fields? In situations where those using the fields are part of a church function, the building restroom facilities will be open. In situations where those using the fields are not doing so as a church function (i.e. DeEvelyn Baseball Team), restroom facilities will not be available. This is consistent with the unavailability of restroom facilities when fields such as are available on Jefferson County School property are utilized by organized little league. Again there will be the presence of a church representative to assure that there is no trespassing on neighboring properties. If the field is used by a church designated group for longer than 3 hours, portable sanitary facilities will be provided, or the church restrooms will be open. 7. Concern for balls going onto adjacent neighboring properties. The orientation of the field should assure that this is kept to a minimum. The entire field will be fenced to keep balls from going beyond it's boundazies. 8. Will the field be for public or private use? The baseball field will be for private use only. 9. The fence around the baseball field will be locked during times of non-use. 10. The volley ball pit lights will be no brighter than the existing and adjoining parking lot lights and will be controlled by a timer. 11. The church will look into hiring a private security company to patrol church property during times of high usage. 12. The field will be professionally maintained to ensure proper upkeep and pleasing visual appearance. 13. The church will explore the possibility of limiting access to parking lots after hours to discourage trespassing. 14. Regular maintenance patrols will be conducted to clean and maintain the field and surrounding azeas. I hope this serves to adequately answer some of the comments and concems raised at last Thursday's meeting. Again, I would like to point out that this plan is a considerable reduction from the plan that was submitted to the neighborhood last July. Please provide me with any other comments you may receive and Pll try to address them as best we can prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Once again, I request that you keep us scheduled for the May 1 Planning Commission meeting. ~ ~ Sincerely, ~~~~8 David Lloyd Chairman Building, Planning, Maintenance and Transportation Committee Encl. ca Trevor Bron, Lee Loyd ~~----- -- -- ----- lil- ~ • ;~ _. -~ _ - - • ---- ---'- ----1 P"~ ~Q ~~ ---- --- -- --- .l-- - -- _.. - _-.-- - - - - ~ y -- -... _ .. _ - - - -- - - ----- - - _ o ~y~ ~~-_ __. __ - - - -- _ - _ _ ~~~~, i~ ~;f .. - ~~ ~ .. 7 Szi/., ~ _ - ~ ----- -- - --- ~ -_ - --- --'- - Q -_.. - ~-~ _ ~' ~ _ . -- -- - - _ _ ____ Is Cam`! ! ~s'~` ~(~ ~ _ _ \jV/~ g p~~'.J/C~-Q~~!~/ ~'-`~l~R~ _ ~ z. /~}_ _ - - -- ~~ i~ P. 1/2 RPR 11 '97 ©8~18RM UR.BRN DRRINRGE . ~~ v ~ r ~n ~ (Date 04/??/97 _ Number of pages including cover sheet 2 I TO: Meredith Reckert ~ FROM: Dave Ltoyd ' ~ : rr,cnn ' V L/, ~.~ 0 2480 West 26th Avenue ~ Suite i 5b-B t ~ ~ ~ nor,,yg~ f:(1 Rr12l9 Phnno i ~iivi~c JV3-'~lJJ~UL7 7 j Fait Phone 235-2857 I Fax Phone 303-455-7880 1 GC. TrevorBren EMGRdCS• ^ i/r~anf IP Fprainnr rGyi~1"r n O~nt," n o .--. o ^^^-~ n•••»••.••••-• n_._._ vet ~~M, U Nq ,5A U + iccac vvnnucru ....,. ieredith -Enclosed is a copy of the a#tenaanca ghept frgm tact nights r•,1eeti^.^ °++'" church. Jusi some thoughts i had regarding some of the comments made: 1 • If gp1aaareri fin men 1)ygg;j Cn some Cf the yUEStiCnS aSk2d of yGi.i pirOr to the r8'viSeuJ ~llafi y~r.8Se;1L2.. w uler~r, than urc +ieignri7Vrs ii8u jJreue~erfillned that they Wore gOing i0 reSlSt ibis Nlan fegardless ai its content. iviost aii of those questions centered around the procedure needed to fight this project. I feel that had we even shown a plan that only included a basketball hoop at the end of the parking lot, that the comments and concerns expressed would have been the same. There seemed to be no acknowledgement or consideration given #o the fact that we had considerably scaled back. our plans for this site. ! .^.C:".r ::rC.^.~er ~"d!^y v.e did that. ~. Based on cave uiviacomo's request to have the list of Planning Commission members furnished him, I would also like to have a copy of that same list. If the neighbors intend to petition the members of the Planning Commission; then I suppose the 84+ famili?s that wg have in the church who are resid?ntc of the city of V1/haat Ririge would also like to gave a gi/nilar ;p~pnrfi mit~i• 3. (have not talked to anyone on the church staff yet regarding last nights meeting but l dan't know That it will havpen much before Sunday. It is still my intent to submit the ~rAdminictr3tiye PfOCBSS Application' fodayand ack fh$f yni i atilt Cncigiricr i+ f:r ire AA~jr '; ;+;eetiny^ cf t~~. Pl~nl'fin~ r_nn7mic~ipn~ !71o~ce rte. iyo me a Cam,!! yS S.^.^vri ^u& yCu iiaYc u 1r11arlb~i• Thal i1CSI ___ _ - - RPR 11 '97 OH: SHflM URHRI'i DRRINF6E - ~I~ ~~E P. 2/2 .:( A 1GY/~,,1gn5]iI.-.._T ~7,.-Vr~ /p ,!~~Icru ~. ... . '', .1/~f'b~ ~fiI~FY' L~fiB~~f - ~>~CE/7C ~%F1,~jS _... ~, _ ~: _ - , ~ . .... . ~ ~ I S Q.J!4 (~--....... . 2~j? - (n 2 O 3 ~ ~vAn,~sc~+/ ~ZC I QnvTr ~ 238- 54®~ ; p ~~i G~,~ ~3 y ~~e . . ~i , l..d.,; .. ,<n~w~ 3rcu 2...a C;, ~'-.J-633 L ~ i~t~~....~ ~o~o, +~-mot. . aka-asp?. . !U Ill ]-y/Ig1,~/ J)" G,.J L-I~VI ~ ~Q,ry c~ ~ /?~u :sa1 Y S~ ~.c~..lC_..,dL' mL ~ Z - 0 .s ~ U-~ ~ ~ z .~ err is-ugh /~ w. ~a= ~. I e ~lJ' c-.~~x t.U ~«`~ ~ ~ tW~ t y~ - • , ~ ~} 7`3~r~~lL~ _. - ~ ~._..I- AI ~/ ~._.-...=i ~ -~ ~, ~ q~/ ~,, , L - L ~ ~% Gc ' cf' OC W"-m!/~~•Y' Z~ Yi7 Sf'? ~7. --....._ ~. k>A «v ~_ n._~..~. tt1'~Pd-L'W99~._R?4t~'lr.~.i .. .. ... --- ^-^- ... a,L3~ Y~/~ v ~~ lftN CUF1~k-'. `~ - .. ... V` - ... V ~~o ~o~< NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING ~ y ~9 9> Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location ofthis mceting is 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on April 10, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for wnstrudion ofone baseball field and volleyball courts. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess ofone (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concems, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public gearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting wilt be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front ofPlanning Corzunission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residems normally have include the following: • Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? • Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? t What is the impact on our strcets7 ' Where will the storm drainage go7 • How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? ! What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me7 After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and the back of this form to list any specific wncems, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required [o provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.O. PRINT NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHO~INPUTMEETING _________ -_____ Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow private LSS~ ? y recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. - bd The location of this mceting is 11225 Weat 32nd Avenue. The time and date for tltis meeting is 7:00 pm on April 10, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one baseball field and volleyball courts. The City of.Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement th.?t, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this mceting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the mceting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability ofthe project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: * Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? ' Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? * What is the impact on our streets? * Where will the storm drainage go? * How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? * What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me7 Afrer attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use Ute following space and the back of this form to list any specific concerns, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.O. Box 638, Wheat Rid(te, CO 80034. Nothing tas solved (drainage, restxo® facilities, lights) frpn the last ~*+ 9 -the wily rri11 do of teas a mt clot ce cmxt o A ~f ~t Yh ni traff4 1'gh ^i, - - __ hi f M f'~1' PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE Linda Ekck ~ 3494 Quail St. "- - 232-SVi95~ ~,~y ? ~~ ` / fC //~ ~~ ~ ~cfJ`rvi ~/' ~ Ju`1 ~ ~iTG~cJ G v ~~~ ~~' ~~ ~ ~G ~ ~`e' ~ tir/,~Q~irr2t~ /emu/ ~ air/.P ~ ' ~~~y%'° ~ ~ /,~-e"~ .c'~~ ~u. L~~ ,a'~',;ti~ ~ ~ ~~ fix- ~ /~'"~"z, --- -' , r NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDTITONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this meeting is 11225 Wut 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm oo April 10, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one baseball field and volleyball courts. The City of Wheat itidge iras adopted a requirement that, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents 'within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Cormnission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: * Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? * Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? * What is the impact on our streets? * Where will the storm drainage go7 * How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detraM from the neighborhood? * What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and the back of this form to list any specific concerns, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, R:O*' ~Hox 638; Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. PRINT NAME // ADDRESS PHONE ~OIOYES ~/9 YC~iPP '~0~~0 ~OU ~T ~~~- ~~j~ NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDTTIONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this meeting is 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on April 10, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one baseball field and volleyball courts. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that, prior to applicafton for retuning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their wncerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front ofPlanning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents nomtally have include the following: Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? * Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? ' What is the impact on our streets? * Where will the storsn drainage go? * How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? * What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use tfie following space-and the back of this form to list any specific concern's, issues or suggestions w}dch you may have ' regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.O. Box_638, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. '~~i!-.;a~E% F /~a_.>~ iii/frCt.3~:~.~e.: ,, _. ~......1:~.3.-~9s S/a - s----- PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE ~ii4~.,.c.....d_L/'n_G~.~r.L-2- leL~n.i,..Qe~~--2~o.2d~:._•ezF_ G_.~-e..- ~ ~ NOTICE OF [OOD INPUT MEETING ~`, s Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this meeting is 11225 Weat 32nd Aveuue. The time and date for this mceting is 7:00 pm ois April 10,1997. The purpose for this proposal is for consWction ofone baseball field and vo0eyba1l court. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that, prior to appGcatioa for remising of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess ofone (1) acre, and for Conditions( Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and des'ues. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy end regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: + Is the proposal wmpatible with surrounding land uses and mningT • Are theta adequatt utilities and services :n place ar propo..ed tc servelhe p:oject? • What is the impact on our streets? Where will the storm drainage go? + How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhoodT • What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to meT After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and the back of this form to list any specific concerns, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P,O. Box 638, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. Please refer to the attachments. PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE Edward A. &~ ~ ~ 10961 West 30th Place ~ ~~~~~~~~~(303)~~232-3411 Phyllis K. Lakewood, CO 80215. Watlington. Comments for the Neighborhood Meeting 4/10/97 Re: Ballfield on Applewood Baptist Church Property. In any event there needs to be 20~~ strip of dense vegetation between the Gulch and the Church Property uses for 2 reasons: 1 This is now a habitat area with heavy ground cave r. R11 ground, cover will 6e gone when the gulch improvements have laeen made. Both cover and a buffer are needed for the protection of wildlife. 2 Vegetation is needed t^ offset the negr ative ecological effects of large expanses of existing paved parking Iots. Also questions that need tc be asked/answered;.. dill there he lights and .will there tie a P.A: system? R tiallfield in itself is acceptable fiut lights and a P.A, system are totally unacceptable in a residential area. Is ball field use to be permanent or is it to [ie temporary to be done away with for a new church and more parking? We were among the 11t] families evacuated in the 1973 Leas Gulch flood. ale saw the potential. The Applewood Knolls hillside drains undec-32nd Ave and between the Church Property and Quail Street. This was before any building or paving on the Church property north of 32nd Ave, and before the fill for the homes west of Quail Street. The resultt even with no water generated norhh oP 32nd Ave was a north-south river that no one could crass. Every sq,fcot of paving generates additional runoff. 2n my opinion, a ball field or any use that permanently precludes additional paving on the property is preferable to a use or uses that require more paving and resu'!t in additional rapid run-off. e.,~cac~- ,- -.L~'~J ~~35 ~ w 38'~~~v ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~-si3y rt~ `p ~, °` ~' 10961 West 30th Place Lakewood, Colorado 80215 April 11, 1997 Ms. Meredith Reckert Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500-West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Dear Ms. Reckert: Nothing was said at the the meeting held April 10, 1997 to change our feelings and concerns as expressed in our letter of June 24, 1996 to the City of Wheat Ridge, a copy attached hereto for -your information. The spokesman for the church did not address any of the items in my letter and these items were discussed at the meeting held in June, 1996. The church had the same spokesman at that meeting. There are no good reasons for the church's proposal, considering all the facts. Sincerely, ~~~~~~ Eckward A. Wa 1' ngto l p L' , A ~~J/~_ PhyGis-K. Watlington June 2L, 1996 r~ I am writing this on my north aatio on a quiet summer afternoon. The meeting at the church did nothing to change our views concerning the plans for haseball fields, soccer Fields and tennis courts. In fact the discussion convinced us even more that the development should NOT take place. There are just too many problems: 1. NOISE 2. Sanitation 3• Traffic congestion 4. Disturbing the "quality of life" of residents living adjacent to and nearby the prapertp. 5. Disturbing the TMquality of WILD Iife° 6. The definite possibility of late- night unapproved and unwarranted use. 7, Parking problems. 8• Proposed fences obstructing neighbors} views. There are parks and schools grounds (i.e. Everitt Middle School in Wheat fridge) for such uses. According to the Applewood Baptist Church this property memberrstatedntheechurcheplansntotleaseathepfieids ifcthech proposed plan is approved. We believe the church should wait until it ca~ aoseddplsying. build the "sanctuary" as shown on its plan. The p op fields do NOT belong in the midst of this residential area. We feel this is not a matter for compromise. I pectfull ' _ r ,G 1~. Wallington I i i ~~~: Wallington G~CC~G~~I/f~D APR ~' ~ 1997 DUANE P. CHESLEY --------------- E-Mail: DPCHESLEYQaol.com 3261 Roult Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-5451 Telephone (303)2365982 City of Wheat Ridge April 14, 1997 Dept. of Community Development P.O. Box 638 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 Re: Applewood Baptist Church Neighborhood Input Meeting, 4-10-97. The Conditional Use request by the Applewood Baptist Church should not be approved by the Planning Commission and/or the City Council for the following reasons: 1. The addition of sports fields on this property would not be compatible with the R-1 zoning which surrounds this property. 2. Added sports facilities on this property will cause additional traffic and noise in the surrounding residential areas. 3. By the Church's own admission these sporting fields would be available to non-Church groups thereby causing a variety of related control issues such as sanitation, trespassing, parking and further noise. 4. Once built these fields would be subject to "normal improvements" to include expansion and lighting to meet expected demand. It is quite evident that this growing Church with there planned development is not compatible with the R-1 setting in which they are located. In order to preserve the surrounding residential area further expansion of facilities at the Church cannot be allowed. In addition the sharing of these proposed sports facilities with the Jefferson County School District cannot be allowed. Sincerely, ~~ Duane P. Chesley E7CNlQ/T ~C ~~ qA,p ~~0(~ NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING ~'~, 0 ~ ., 1,g9> App[ewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDTTIONAL USE to allow private ``~`. recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. ~'~, , The location of this meeting is 11225 Wwt 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7x00 pm on April 10, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one baseball field and volleyball courts. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staffplanner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Platu»ng Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: * Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? * Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? * What is the impact on our streets? * Where will the storm drainage go7 * How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? * What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me7 :Y _, ...e. ......V.J.__.. .~.._.._....~.`.._.. .. ....... ......~ ........ ..., ._. ._. ..... After attending the Neighborhood-Input Meeting;- please use the following space and the back of this form to list any specific concerns, issues orsuggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Develoament. P.O. PRINT NAME ADDRESS _ . PHONE • NOTICE OF i INPUT MEETING Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this meeting is 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on Apri110,1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one basehall field and volleyball courts. Iss~ ~ z ~~d -- The City-of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: * Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? * Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? * What is the impact on our streets? * Where will the storm drainage go? * How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? * What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and the back of this form to Gst any specific concerns, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.O. Box 638, Wheat Rid e, CO 80034. Nothing was solved (~minage, restrocm faci]ities, lights) from the last greeting -the only mall chiStLren. ~n if ha .c don inrorrxtly who kn~m hrna many othar thing¢ tha rhnrrh will do wrong and then et aura with because its ahead a done deal. have lived in my home for 27 years and I DO Ix7i' WAM' A HALLFr~n of any kind in my face. is a pleasan , nei an cars, an y ga 4L. ~BA-~{~T nil.. i.i.- ...4.. •.. ..._..1 ~. .1.... 1.- _..'1 ... rl... _.1_ L_._ L_~L....~- f _l~ (j[m~t w.anfi the nni.~n traffi'r ' lights in nttr cri nrirnac nr ar~'canhl anrc of o nthl stir fi old the proposed planned ball fields. Maybe if they did they would hanoe their rmnds about PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE Linda Hock 3494 Quail. St. ~ 232-9/+95 NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The locatiomof this meeting is 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on Apri110, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one baseball field and volleyball courts. The City of tXheat Ridge has adopted a re~»ireP.enr that, prior to application forsezonirg of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this "meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: * Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? --- * Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? * What is the impact on our streets? * Where will the storm drainage go? _~~ ~~ ~~ ~, i * How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the yl ' neighborhood? * What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me7 After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and the back of this form to list any specific concerns, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.O. Box 638, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. PRIIVT NAME ADDRESS PHONE ~~ ~ ~,~ ~~ ~r-,~~.~ G~ J - ~~ ~ . ~. ~. ~~:~ _ . __ • NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDTfIONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this meeting is 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on Apri110, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one baseball field and volleyball courts. The City of Wheat Tc'tdge has adopted a requirement that, prior to appiication For rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. i:f you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: * Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? * Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? * What is the impact on our streets? * Where will the storm drainage go7 * How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? * What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me7 After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and, the back of this form to list any specific concerns, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, fix- 3~~,-Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. PRINT NAME/ ADDRESS PHONE _. ~OjOYGJS /'" ~YC~ipY ~o7~vO ~dU%/ eS'7~ ~~~'- ~7/f~' i NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this meeting is 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on April 10, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one baseball Tield and volleyball courts. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: * Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoningT * Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? * What is the impact on our streets? * Where will the storm drainage go? * How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? * What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting,-please use~tlie following space and the back of this form to list any specific concerns, issues or suggestions whia_h you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.O. Box 638, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. , ~.., ,.. . ,. PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE ..._ 'A ^, . ~ - . , E y~ " ry) ~{ /~ y ' ~',. .c,f . :~•~ .. i. . . .. 41.u}l.e. .LY~ 19~4 . . ~.. . . . . .. . . . . . - n . ~ . ~ . .._ , ~ ' .• ' ~} ~ • '~ • _. , . .. . , . ~ ~ .. . :~,_a~ wxitin$ this on mz north patio,on a.qu3.et eummer~ ~ ~t~`t~~noon, The meet3ng at the cfiurch did.. nathiz~g to chauge x~~tr'v~~wa concerning the plans far baeeb~Tl fie~.ds, soccer fields axad ~ennia conrts, Ia f~.~t the d3.~cn~~iun cqnvinced us eqen ~srar~ that t6a d~velppmem,t, ahaulct PTQT tais~ glace« - , . ~: . There are ~nst tpo raariy,prahleme: ~ . . , ~., .. ;;.. , . ~.. AOZSE .. . .. . . . . _.. . . . .: . - .. ~ ~ . . - -. -~. . ~. ~a,ui:tatton " ~ ! ~"r~ffic cange~'~~oa ; , ..:. ~ = . ' . „ . .. . . . . x. , ~: IIisturhin$ the "_qaeliCp o£ life" c2f_resident~ 1,3,vin~ , ~dd~a~ent tts and ,nea~'by the pragertp. ~. ~ ~i~turbing the "~qua3.itq of WILD ~.if~", _ ~. The de£iaite pos~£,b9.7.i.ty o£ late- n3.ght unapprovod " ~u8 unxar~anted uae. , , _ , ,_ .. . . . . - . _ ~a P~rki.~g gr'dblem~. .., _ . .. ' Fropcasecl fences o~s~rsscCing nelghbo;s'.views. . . ~; _ . ,.,: ^T~,~re ar:~ Parks and echools ~rounds (i.e, Eeeritt MiddZe ~chpo~. ~p h~eat xidge} for suc1~ uaes, , .,. . . , . . . , - . ~ . , _ . __ ~;~c~putfn~.ta the A~plewood Baptiat Church this gropertp vss ve~y eipensive ~.hawever: no taaes are,ga4d). A church memher etated the church plans to leese tlxe ~ields i.f the ~ ~roposed glan is approved. . . -'yW~ believe the chuzch s~iquld Ketit un,til it c~n affprd to build the 'ra~uctu8sp" ~& ~hawn,.on 3ts plan. The proposed playing fie2ds ~o RpT belong in the m~ifst a£ this reeidentiaT area. STe ,feel thfs is not e t~set~s ~or comgromise, ~ . . aectfuZl ' ~ ~ . . ~ : ~ ,~ ~G ~~ . . _~?hy1~a ~. Watlin~ton _ . i ( . : ~ . G~.~~~ ~° ~ , . ' 8dwa,r.d A: Watlington . ~. , . ~ ~. " " . : . . 1 NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETWG Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDTI'IONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this meeting is 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on April 10,1997. The purpose for.this proposal is for construction of one baseball field and volleyball courts. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requitement that, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staffplanner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. Ifyou want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: * Is the proposal compatible with surcounding land uses and zoning? * Are therz adequate ut'slities and servic:.s in place Sr proposed to serve the gr~ject? ' What is the impact on our streets? * Where will the storm drainage go7 * How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? • What specific changes cen be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and the back of this form to list any specific concerns, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.0. Box 638, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. Please refer to the attachments. PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE Edward A. & ~ 10961 West 3bth Place ~ ~ "~'~ (36~} 232-3411 Phyllis K. Lakewood, C0 80215 Watlington, (a _ _ _ 735.00 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 _ Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 s j Ridge ~~ APR 2 9 157 Apri[1, 1997 ~-=....___ The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for approval ofa conditional a oe snit to allow a private recreational facility on Residential One zoned properh gt the property described below Your response to the followtng questions and any comments an this proposal would be appreciated by ADril 14 1997. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: CUP-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church LOCATION.• 11225 West 32nd Avenue REQUESTED ACTIGN: Approval of a conditionaf use permit in a Residential-Gne zone disirici. PURPOSE: To allow a private recreation faciliry (baseball field and vofleyball pits). APPROXItt1ATEAREA: N/A •° ~ *``"'~ " a ~ ~ ,' ?~`F .~~ `~ I. Are ubli acilities or services rovided b P ~ p y your agency adequate to serve this development? ? t , PR ®2 X997 .,.~ YES NO ., If "NO'; please explain below. A 1~ n 2. Are service lines avatl~e to the developmem? ""` .,~..''~~:,~ s YES____NO! . If "NO", please explain below w . ,....- .-.~ 3. Do you h e adequate capacities to service the development? YES NO ~ If "NO ", please explain below. 4. Can and w' your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES NO_ If "NO'; please explain below. 5. Are there arty concerns or problems you agency has identified which would or should affect approves! of this request? Please reply to: Meredith Reck rt Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Con. Mutual) X Sanitation District (NW Lakewood) X Fire District (Wheat Ridge) X Adjacent Ciry (Lakewood) X Public Service Co. X US West Communications State Lane Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. OjTransportation X Colorado Div. Of Wildlife X X X "The Carnation City" TCI of Colorado Jeffco Health Department Jejfco Schools Jejjeo Commissioners Detrver Water Board WR Post Office WR Police Department Public Works Dept. WR Park & Rec Commission WR Forestry Division WR Building Division • 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 ~2Bat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 RL[1~g6 April 1, 1997 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for aoDroval of a conditional use permit to allow a private recreational facility on Residential-One zoned property at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by April 14. 1992 No response from you by __ this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: CUP-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church LOCATION: .11225 West 32nd Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of a conditional use permit in a Residential-One zone district. PURPOSE: To allow a private recreation facility (baseball field and volleyball pits). APPROXIMATE AREA: N/A 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES NO. If "NO ", please explain below. 2. Are service lines available to the development? YES NO . If "NO ", please explain below. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES NO. If "NO'; please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES NO If "NO", please explain below. 5. Are there any concerns or problems you agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Meredith Reckert Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION.• X Water District (Con. Mutual) X Sanitation District (NWLakewood) X Fire District (Wheat Ridge) X Adjacent City (Lakewood) X Public Service Co. X US West Communications State Lane Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. Of Transportation X Colorado Div. Of Wildlife X X X "The Carnation City" TCI of Colorado Jeffco Health Department Jeffco Schools Jeffco Commissioners Denver Water Board WR Post Office WR Police Department Public Works Dept. WR Park & Rec Commission WR Forestry Division WR Building Division L MEMORANDUM TO Meredith Reckert Planning and Development FROM Deri Patt Police Department SUBJECT Case No: CUP-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church 11225 W. 32 Avenue DATE April 3, 1997 From this plan, I have no recommendations at this time. If a more detailed plan becomes available, I would like to review it. While my recommendations do not guarantee acrime-free environment, it has been experienced that application of the concept of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (OPTED) will reduce the opportunity for crime to occur and will enhance the quality of life. Thank you. Deri ., 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone 303/ 237-6944 April 1, 1997 Ridge The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for anaroval ofa conditional ue oermit to . allow a orivate recreational facifirv on Residential-One zoned property at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be apprecjated by Aari114. 1997. Igo response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: CUP-97-3/Applewaod Baprtst Church LOCATION.• 11 Z25 West 32nd Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of a conditional use permi! in a Residential-One zone district. PURPOSE: To allow a private recreation facility (baseball field and volleyball pits). APPROXIMATE AREA: N/A 1. Are public acilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES NO_ !f "NO ", Please explain below. - _ ._ 2. Are service lines available to the development? ,(~ ~. YES NO_ If "NO ", please erplain below. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES / NO_ If "NO ", please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regufations? YES /NO. If "NO", please explain below. 5. Are there any concerns or problems you agency has identifred which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Meredith Reckart Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Con. Mutual) X Sanitation District (NK' Lakewood) X Fire District (R'heat Rrdge) X Adjacent City (Lakewood) X Public Service Co. X US West Communications State Lane Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. OjTransportation X Colorado Div. OjWildlife X X X "The Carnation City" The City of Wheat TCI ojColorado Jeffco Health Departmen! Jeffco Schools Jeffco Commissioners Denver Water Board WR Post Office WR Police Department Public Works Dept. WR Park & Rec Commission WR Forestry Division WR Building Division ................_. _ ___ ~.~~/~ City of Lakewood Planning, Permits and Public Works 44b South AlFsan Parkway Lakewood, CO 80226.3705 Phone- (3031887.79001Voice 13 031 8 87-75 9 01T~0 Fex-13031897.7879 Apri14, 1997 ~, 9p~ ~ y 0~< ,99 7 Ms. Meredith Reckert ~' ~. Department of Planning & Development '~.~ 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Outside Referral Case No. OR-97-003 4615 Harlan Street Dear Ms. Reckert: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this case. The City of Lakewood planning staff has reviewed the referrat for the request of conditional use permit and plat. Lakewood planning staff has no comments or concerns. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 987-7522. S'~cerely, C'hry~ Planneri r:Wa1977oH7003.cJ4 __ MEMORANDUM Approved Date TO:__ Meredith Reckert, Senior 'Planner FROM: Greg Knudson, Development Review DATE: April_4, 1997 SUBJ: Applewood Baptist Church Playing Fields, 11225 West 32nd Avenue, CUP-97-3/Applewood Baptist Chur_ch_ The Public-Works Department has reviewed. the Planning Department referral. dated April 1, 1997 and has the following comments: 1. We will need a final drainage study prepared by a_Colorado _ registered professional civil engineer, and submitted for, review and approval. 2. We will need a completed Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with fees due, submitted for review and. approval.,. Please be_ aware that_in conjunction with this permit,. and erosion control plan may need to be submitted fbr.review an approval, 3. We will need engineered construction drawings and the _.. respective guarantee if any of the existing public improvements along the West 32nd:.Avenue frontage are to be modified for this project. 4. The Public Works Department Will not approve the construction. of this project until .such time as the required drainage certification letter that has been .requested for the parkin lot that was recently constructed,_is submitted for review .and approval. 5. A traffic impact study will be required for-this project. Modifications will be_required to the existing acce~a:p~ints to the property to insure traffic safety. 6. The city's surveyor has reviewed the referral information, and has no comments at-this time. cc: Glen Gidley, Planning.& Development Director Dave Rotecki, Sr. Project Engineer -- Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer John McGuire, City Surveyor File t ONSOLIDATED mutual water April 3, 1997 Meredith Reckert Department of Planning and Development City of Wheat .Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re:-City of Wheat- Ridge Case Number CUP-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church, 11225 West 32nd Avenue, proposed conditional use permit to allow a private recreation facility (baseball field and volleyball pits) Dear Ms. Reckert: This will acknowledge receipt of_ your correspondence dated April 1, 1997 regarding the above referenced project. Please be advised that-the above referenced property is in ari area served by The Consolidated Mutual Water Company. Our records indicate,- that the property addressed as 11225 West -32nd Avenue is currently receiving domestic water .from the-Company through a 1-inch meter (CMWCo Tap Number-'19275/ Account Number B-2009200). Domestic water service" may continue to be provided to this- property subject _to compliance with the Company's rules, regulations and requirements for such service. - The Company requires-.that a new application for water service be- completed by the owner-and returned to the Company at the time there is a change in use. The Company considers a remodel or building addition as a "change of use". The Company's rules, regulations and. requirements further require-that each separate structure be served by a separate tap and meter, -and in order-'to receive- domestic water- service, the property must also front a Company main. If the future planned use of .this- property is within any of .the above categories, the owner,'erigineer or-architect should contact -this- office: as soon as possible so that we may determine what water system improvements will be. needed to serve this property. THE CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 12700 West 27[h Avenue • P.O. Box 150068 • Lakewood, Colorado 50215 . Telephone 238-Oi51 Pax 237-5560 ~ t Meredith.Reckert City of-Wheat Ridge April 3, 1997 Page 2 Fire protection requirements should be obtained from the Wheat.Ridge-Fire Protection District and' those requirements forwarded to this office by the Fire District-at the earliest possible time. We can then determine if .additional system improvements would be required to meet the demands set forth by the Fire-District. ' If you should have any questiens or co::.:nents regarding this correspondence, please contact this office. -- Sincerely, ~~~ Michael Queen water Distribution Manager /jl cc: Applewood.Baptist Church {Applicant) Dave Roberts, Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District Walter Welton, PLS/PE, CMWCo President' 7500 W esf 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 Ridge Apri11, 1997 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for aooroval ofa conditional use permtt to allow a private recreational facility on Residential-One zoned arooerty at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and arty comments on this proposal would be appreciated by ~ri11Q. 1997. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: CUP-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church LOCATION: 11225 West 32nd Avenue REQUESTED ACTION.• Approval ofa conditional use permit in a Residential-One zone district. PURPOSE: Ta allow a private recreation facility (baseball freld and volleyball pits). APPROXIMATE AREA: N/A 1. Are public acilities ar services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES NO_ If "NO", please explain below. 2. Are service lines available to the development? YES ~ NO_ If "NO ", please explain below. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES ~ NO_ If "NO", please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES /. NO Ij "NO ", please explain below. _ 5. Are there any concerns orproblems you agency has identified w/hich would or should affect approval of this /requ~es(t? 7~te ISSN-~ ~ (i uc2/ffi~//~;~CLESS to t"~t'~°~°!~ Please reply to: Meredith Reckert n ~ ,~ .~G g~~/,~S,Seq/ w r~r ~ cYe FK i lt:~ Department of Planning & Development l ~~y n/to ~ ~ f ~ ~~,,v vzQ, DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Con. Mutual) X Sanitation District (NW Lakewood) X Fire District (Wheat Ridge) X Adjacent City (Lakewood) X Public Service Co. X US West Communications State Lane Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. OjTransportation X Colorado Div. Of Wildlife X X X "The Carnation City " TCI of Colorado Jejfco Health Department JeQco Schools Jeffco Commissioners Deriver Water Board WR Post Office WR Police Department Public Works Dept. WR Park & Rec Commission WR Forestry Division WR Building Division i500 WEST2PTHAVENUE • P.O. 8OX 636 WHEAT RIDGE. CO 60034-0638 (303) 234-5900 City,Admin. Faz-- 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 2352949 April 14, 1997 - " The Ciiy of Wheat Ridge Mr. Gary Theander, P.E. Mountain States Engineering Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Re: Applewood Baptist Church Parking Lot, 11200 West 32nd Avenue - Drainage Certification Letter Dear Gary, This letter is to inform you that as a result of a recent field inspection of the temporary parking lot drainage facilities, the following items need.-to be addressed: 1. The present alignment of the 8-inch detention pond has been placed in t the detention pond instead of_being outlet directly to the north of the City. Please re-locate this section alignment. outlet pipe from the ie northwest corner of placed as designed to pond as approved by the of pipe to the designed 2. The 8-inch diameter outlet pipe is to be the-approved PVC pipe instead of the corrugated plastic pipe that has been placed. 3. The proposed overflow spillway needs to be placed as designed, on the north bank of the detention pond. 4. A standard letter of certification for the temporary parking lot drainage improvements, as outlined in the city's October_ 29, 1996 letter of approval for the project, needs to be submitted for. review and approval. Please be aware that the Public Works Department may choose to deny processing of any future onsite improvement documents that requ' e o approval_-until such time as the above referenced ite hav been completed to the satisfaction of the City. If/you ~`ave arm questions, p-lease contact me at 235-2868.. Si~np~rely,/ - /~ Greg~nu~lson Deve opm t Review Engineer cc: Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Ralph Perri Pile <a re., ~, i~ d r,~,,,.~ i ~ ~- ~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on May 1, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petition shall be heazd: 1 ('ace Nn CUP-97-2: An application by Sts. Peter and Paul Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Denver for approval of a Conditional Use Pernut to allow the expansion of a church and private school with a fence height variance in the Residential-Two and Residential-Three zone districts. Said property is located at 3900 Pierce Street and is legally described as follows: Lots 12 through 28, and the west 137.5 feet of lot 50, James Subdivision, and lot 9, Anel Subdivision, City of Wheat Ridge, County of 7efferson, State of Colorado. 2. Case No CUP-97-3:_ An application by the Applewood Baptist Church for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a church (baseball field and volleyball courts) in a Residential-One zone district. Said property is located at 11225 West Avenue and is legally described as follows: The west''/z of Tract 21, and all of Tract 22, Brookside Subdivision, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. 3. Coen Nn WZ-97-3: An application by Rob Tucker for Custom Envelope Corporation for approval of an amendment to a Planned Industrial Development final development plan. Said property is located at 4990 Iris Street and is legally described as follows: Lot 1, Kipling 5000 Business Pazk Subdivision, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Marilyn Gunn, Recording Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk _ _ - To be Published: April 11, 1997 Wheat Ridge Transcript f. I ~_ ~ ~~~ I . 1 ,,_ - cove - " ~.. • ~' - ..~ .., _..-.-. i7-J 1 I c..1 n o ;'~' ; ~ ' '-1 '.'.' '- =-_. _ _ ~ § ca., .. - v` I n 11 J ~ R-114 '~-~ ~:.: - ~ PROS EGT ~ .._. :::~ I VA T N - 5 ~ .. ., n ~R - u aelm wee _ - ~ - W 11RD AVE nS~ Q p I W N ~ ~ 0 n li ~.r ?-~/; .. .~::.. - -- ~_ -~ 1 r LAIGEWOOD OFFI GI,~tL ' i r '; : 100-YEAR PLOOD PLAIN ZONING M,°~P --~~ (APPROXIMATELOGATIOW J~fH~,°~T RIDG~ P ~aRl` ~N°~Y - j~ DOLOR ADO NERSHIP) DTSI~ TE --,-G MI LINE MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 " " - TER FEATURE Last Revieion: September I8, 1996 • DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES ~>~ o w I~~'./D .. .. SGALE I'.400 PO POX 638 TELEPHONE 303133%-69aa The City o~ T_00 WEST ?9TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE. COIOHADO 9003a cwheat . ~ ~ Ridge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE N0. CUP- g'J'3 PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY COUNCIL - BOARD, OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE: IY~gy1, Ig~j7 , I ,~~_. AUJ?~_s1z,_LL.~~~~` n a m e residing at /~~5• S• C~~, ~~~'~ ~~ (Circle One) ' ._ -- C'O ( a d d r e s s as the applicant for Case No. ~LlP-~~'3 hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at o c' a t i o n , on this /j®~ day of ~,y~ f 19~~, and do ~~'., hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (i5) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature• ~,~/~"/, NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Department of Community Development. M A P +500 \NEST 29TH AVENUE P.O. SOX 63S + The Cify of WHEAT RIDGE. CO 5003~~0638 (303) 23: 5966 Wheat Gty Admin. Fax # 23a-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 2352949 ~Rldge PUBLIC HEARING POSTING REQUIREMENTS Applicants are required to post a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING before all Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Signs will be provided by the Department of Planning and Development. One sign must be posted per street frontage. In addition, the following requirements must be met: ^ The sign must be located within the property boundaries. ^ The sign must be securely mounted on a flat surface. ^ The sign must be elevated a minimum of thirty (30) inches from ground. ^ The sign must be visible from the street without obstruction. ^ The sign must be legible and posted for fifteen (i5) continuous days prior to and including the day of public hearing. It is the applicant`s responsibility to certify that these requirements have been met and to submit a completed Posting Certification Form at the public hearing. c:~wp60tifil es~posti ng.frm .. ~ ~°~ 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 Rldge April77, 1997 Tlxis is to inform you that Case No.,C~l P-97-03 which is a request for anorov^~ ^r^ ~^Nditiona[ use to ,c allow expansion of a church baseball field and vollevball courts) for property located at 11225 West 38th Avenue will be heard by the Wheat Ridge PLANNING COMMISSION in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 7500 West 29th Avenue at 7. 0 P. on May I 1997. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the PLANNING COMMISSION. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this meeting. If you have any questions or desires to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division. Thank you. PLANNING DIVISION "The Carnation City" .. .., - __ ~0 ~c7 //PS ~~~~~ ~.~_-- _: l~~ ~ o ~v t l ~~ S a ku.+-v+~t $OZ I ~ .~d~ ~' .. ~JP cc vJ e~ ~ t,Gt.~ / i ~,. ~ ..~ ?_ .F~~--f ~ ~~t y -_ - ---- .3o~s Qu~~~-s=t-_ - --- ~~z~~_Q~i sf _ ~_ ~,_ _____ __-.. ~ . ~ - - - i _:; ___ .~__~v-:o-~'S____` I~T'i-fT(~~"r~'n'T~~~~~~'~~~~'~~"~«~TnTr~- . ~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ , '~ ~ i ~ • ~ 1J _ ~ B- l _ . _ . _ ~ ///~I /ll/IL~i «.~ /~/~r( V _ .,~ / ! l 5! W. ~-z~ G(,u~e_ :.+. _ __ _------ _.:~`~a fiv, ~ ~, -f-f~~ -!- . _ _.. .:~:1b9b8 cJ~ 3ti~ G~(.u~e- . _ ~, J~ (,t r 5~ ._ ~. (.~._/ vt ~' ~' _ .. ry ~ ~ .. l. l ~~Cv ~J . 38_`~>'~,,~- ,1 ~ ~~~ 11~~~ _ G-a-be )_ _ _ ;,1 ~a-~N G~~a ~ ( 5~- _ _ ;~ ~:~ _ - . ,' . _ _____ _. _ ___ _ _ ,., j i ~ T~' ~rv~Tr'I1~~'~~~~-~~'~~~ -- `, ** CQ22 ~ ** 0011 ~ ** CO11 James Patrick O Toole David C Miller _ Art r b d 3495 Quail ST 3455 Quail ST 34 ai T Wheat Ridge CO 80033-5408 Wheat Ridge CO 80033-5408 Whe t Ridge CO 80033-5408 ** C011 ** CO11 ** 0000.-...- Timothy F Coursey Leila J Hill D id Di G' o 3395.. Quail ST 3345 Quail ST 5 6 r Wheat Ridge CO 80033-5441.. Wheat Ridge CO 80033-5441 Arvada O 80002-1818 ** C013 ** C021 ** C017 John A Odom Gary P Day Louis J Ficco 11490 W 38th Ave 11350-W 38th Ave 3650 Vance ST Wheat Ridge CO 80033-3802 Wheat-Ridge CO 80033-3958 Wheat Ridge CO 80033-6293 Jer y B Tur 11 56 W th ** C021 80 ** C021 B T ner Howard G Noble W 8 e 11254 W 38th Ave idge CO 80033-3-908 Wheat Ridge CO 80033-3908 ** C021 ** C021 ** 0004 ** C021 F John.Batug Open Lands Colorado E est' e W' liams 11252-W 38th Ave 5555 Dtc Pky #2050 11 Ave ~._..~ Wheat Ridge CO 80033-3908 ..Englewood CO 80111-3005 eat Ridge 33-3g6g ** C005 ** C020 Ro ey J ick Ra h J Per ' 11 3E 32nd Ave 10~.3&~1 and T Wheat-Ridge C 0033-54 7 .Lakewood CO 80 18 Yt¢~~r~t~ r3 . ~EudT~ 3~i s o ~o u. Tf" `~ Wti 8 0033 r~ m a W m m .n e- 6 rL ..o m ra m m .D 17' __ _ _ .• M RETURN ~~-' ~IRLet Rlerrxs 4 anbPor 2 far adtlitional seances --~ ~ I also wlsh to receive the ADDR[ 'Rn"t Yar name andaddrass qn the reverse of this form so that uve can return this card RECEIPT 6Ta ~- ~ f010WInJ SerVlCes (fOr an extra fee): cERrrlr 1. ^ Addressee's Address SERVICE • Uach-thislorm to the front of the mailpiece, or on me back if space tlces not permit rorAL I'r , T - -- - _ 2. ^ Restricted Delivery -~ oxJ1o-wham the article was deliveratl and the date tlel'veretl. ' SENT Tn1 °' a_arrl„Ie ea.,.,.---..' ..---... ' ~' •~•.~~rv i~U1114C1 ~,~ >J ~:= iE~scxa-~ P 9 6 3 3 61 3 61 3275 Qt183,j ~ ~ `s~ ~~• ab. Service Type CERTIFIED C~-97-3 '•"'"~ ~. 7. Date of Deliverv ~S FORM 3800 'SENDER: - - x ~ Complete items 1 and/or 21or additional services. I also Wish t0 reCelve the ~ Print your name and address on the reverse of this corm so mat we can return mis card following services (for an extra fee): m You 1. ^ Addressee's Address _ ,~,-~,~_ __ - '-Attach this~_Ihe front of-the mailpiece, or on the back h space does not permit 2. ^ ReStrlCted DellVery * The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. ' ~ - Consult o _~~- - 'n€Arti9le Addressed tD:. _ _ p stmaster for fee. _ RErueN "" - _ - _._ P 9 6 3 3 61 3 6 2 SNOW r + - ~ ,r RECEIPT ADDREGS _ - _ _ _ sERVICE cERT'PIEC` - - , ,+'-- ~- o 'x'46. Service Type TorA<P~~ -- -- ~ CERTIFIED SENT TO: " NF - t:~~97-3 t- - 7. Date of D livery ~"f~'s'la ___ l ,2 ~~ 3t, ~-Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Address t,- ~ ~: (ONLY it requested and lee paid) :-B. Signatur!P./~'~dr~ssee or Agent y r -- ¢ - ,~ - .-_ - - ~ N F - - .: --- I POSTAGE C pl I'. RETURN ---'-~ - rf~fi m .D m r~ m m o- R RECEIPT SERVICE PS FORM 3800 US ° sr: ^<e' i `-~ ~"" "4J7 c'..~III S401N TO WHOM DATE f ADDREGS°FpELIVERY ~ ~ /ri RF'i ~- CERTIFIED FEE t RETUW ' ' ~ i TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEI m -~ ~ INS N ~ O i^~ / VVi far ~ ~ - - ): _ NOT FOR INTEI W r ~ ~ w - r ' .-~ ~ ~- r- ,, P~tta:ice F. EarE ' ~ ' < '~_ 2g9t$ bl. 32 A r ~ 'Wheat ~,. LO i ~ v l~ - '-. a '' ~ r 4T.c a r d ^`r''a1 ~r I ~~ ,> ~ f.~ `-I. !17 i ~i ~ .-~ ~ ENDER: I also wish to receive the I eosrae .Complete items t aM/or z for atlditienal services. following services (for an extra fee): I RETURN sRav ~ • print your name antl atltlress on the reverse of this farm so [hat we can return this card AddreSS t ^ Add ' RECEIPT abDRE. }o_ycu . ressee s SERVICE - CERiIFf • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back i space does not permt. 2. ^ ResirCted Delivery ~ ~ NiaL F • The Return Receipt will show to whom the arlide was deliveretl antl [he tlate tlelivere CgOSUt pOStmaSter fOr e~ m SENT TO: x ~Ar~f`ice resse o: - -- -- ~ 4a. Article Num er ,~ - ~~ ~ ----- _-_ - -- P 963 361 358 m 3Q~5 Qu~d,+ u5 t.3.I. at. r,.l t .ter: 'J `i7~,'. ~ ~ _~ o- o. CTS-`1T-3 ~ '°5. Received By: (Pri Name) 'PS FORM 3800 _~_ - Ign_r di ee or Agent) __ -- - I cn. Service type ~. v.- - a. paid.) I I I RETURN RECEIPT ~. SERVICE m SENT PoSlortfm-m..mvnr.mric~. imp - ~c~c, m ~.r «a.m.n r a(mc~ uac+.~~~r P'~n".n. eHOV ~ The Return Receipt will show to whom the arlick was tlelivered antl the date tlelivered. aopF cERr _3_Adicle Addressed to "' 3238 Lk~ m Si~leat Ri - o. CC8'-87-3- 5. Received By: (Print Name) - - ~ ... "'gna Ire: (Addy ee or e J p PS FORM 3800 ~~[__~ -- __--_ , I l 8. Addressee's Address ' (ONLY it requested and fee paid.) EPSFORM 1J~Janua ,fss Domestic Return Receipt _..~ Posmce}- DERc._ - -_ RETURN gy~,yy i,- - - _ _ - ---° - I aISO wish t0 reC21Ve the I • Can lete items 1 and/or 2 for atltlitional services. axRes> p following services (for an extra fee): , RECEIPT -~ int you~d address on the reverse of-tPrs twm so iF3rw~Fametorlrthis caN ceRilrle=-:.~.p _ _ 1. ^ Addressee's Address SERVICE O TOTAL a~-~Ynttach this Corm to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does rrot permit. 2. ^ REStrlCfed DBIVery "'~ eturn eceipt wi sow o w om ear ice was a were an Ke a e e rve~~~ Ong c~maStef tOr m SENT TO: _ ~rtidle addressed to: 4a. Article Number ~ ~ P 963 361 360 m 1U961 :+~ .3 _ __ 7f>~561 =;t. 3nEh ?=i, ~ 4b. Service Type m S~ Ridg iEs~at T.?s.~ ~.' g^~`.r3 '~ ~ - '~ CERTIFIED °- - a ~'~,.~ _ -- --~.~,~~y GO ~E~ 7. Date of Delivery _ ?' . ec_ ve_ y:" nn ame _ _ __' q ddressee's Address PS FORM 3800 _. _.,_ .... .-,_,..-..,~.. ~ ~ L1 ONLY if requested and tee paid) -6. Si :-(Adtlress Ag, nt) ~ ~$~ PS FORM 3811, dancsry tg~~ -- - - _ - - - - - _- - - - --- - - Domestic Return Receipt ._ _._._..... _....,_ ___ r Consult postmaster for fee. title Number - P 963 361 359 ~~ 4b. Service Type CERTIFIED Ill m A ..o m m ~- m RETURN flECEIPT SERVICE ---- _ __ SENDER: I also wish to receive the iCOmpiete items 1 armor z for additipnai services. following services (for an extra fee): rPPit¢yeurTeme~ntl-adtlress on the reverse of this loan so that we can return fits card to yov 1. ^ Addressee's Address • At[acM1 this form to the front of the mailpiece; or on the back if space does not permit. 2- ~ RestrCted DelVery The Rem ecR eiprwiii s~~ onsns€amcie was celiverea and the oate~eirvu,~-d. Consult postmaster for fee. ~Rrticle-Addressezt ion - - - - - - - 4a. Article Number -~~~-~~ ~ - ~ P 963 361 355 _ _ _ ~ - ~ . _,_ _ _ _ 4b. Service Type DQ1cxt~,= 'fit ,~-~,t, ~~','' ,'?~'1:~3 _ '-~6D ~` ~ CERTIFIED i~Ieat _- ~- - ~~ ~ 7. Date of Delivery CL1~^g~~ S. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Address y N„ _ _ (ONLY if requested and fee paid.) e ).-: . PS FORM 3800; '8: SI n u ~ A7dressee or Agent)- ' ~ JG-C/Y ?-= X e Ps FORM 3811, January rasa Domestic Return Receipt - ~ ~ - - ._,_...~._.--~. r -..~.r~~ ~~...,_. ------_____.._~______.v`-.--- i I .D U7 m ra .~ m m D" Q o _, w a 0 >h w~ LL~ oa , a= Or ~ ~_ 6~ ~~ U~ F=. yw aw ~S nr-___ -. -. :. PS FORM 3800 us Postal service ~ Receipt for ~,'; Certified Mail f N ~n m ra m m Q' 2 RETURN RECEIPT SERVIC E J ceRTlTie aArtic,Te q~essed 70' TOTAL PC '' Tp ...ES~II}s. t' . va ..: - . .. .. _ i~.~ss x~. ~ - St 22~d . x'37-3 7~~ e ^5: Received By: (Print Name) n , ~ ~ r .. 9.63 361 ~5 r vice Tvoe CERTIFIED O ~ ~ ~ / S. Addressee's Address (ONLY it requested and fee paid.) PS FORM 3800 ~6.Signa e: t~resse-ego ~c -3 ' ~ ZC~ - _ ;. Ps Fo 3811, Janu is - - D tic turn Receipt a(y 1 ~ - -- Q(~~r~, ~y - . _-__. = ~ _.. _- ..... . .. ..... eLl.irlr~Utfl~tt~nii rL tin itOniL ei ii rf tirLtitllttrlttrrr t I I: I also wisn to receive uie gems ~ ardror z for addaronai services. following services (for an extra fee): name and address on-IlT~reverse-ot this iorm so that we can return Mis wrd t ~ Addressee's Address berm to the from of the mailpiece, or on the back if space tlees rat permit. 2. ^ REStrlCted DBIIVery 'n Receipt will show to whom the article was deliveretl and the date delivered, CORSUIf p05lma5ter fOr fee. - ~ - ~ - _ - - da 4rtinle Number _-_.~.-. ~.. _~ -_.~: _ f_. _a_~ .~._...._-~ -- -~_ - ~ I acslACE r •COa fete Iterss~an pr 2focatltlitional services RETURN I also wish to receive the _ sNaw Tr, ~ RECEIPT "DES ~° t RnM your name antl atltlress on the reverse of this Corm so ih following services (for an extra fee): aLwe-wit[elu[r~thiscard 'OT'01~ cERrIFIEe FEF -- 1. ^Addressee's Address rLl SERVICE lfach.this-form to-thetront of the mail iece, or on the back If s ace tloes not ermit. p p p 2. ^ Restricted Delivery v u7 eHewcaRecei t_win.. _ _ a f0_'_^~ PDST"c e~date.darearea--Consult postmaster for fee. rrt SENT TO: Nar 3~vhcle Addressed to: 4a~ArliGe Number _ -_ - ~ _: .: ~ 1~?t,%n €Isris+ti,~czs P 9 6 3 3 61 3 5 2 "T _ - 315'3 ~I;Ya rw3x+e~e 3259 Fd -. ': :,,`- ~ 4b. Service Type Tk "° - - ~ CERTIFIED ^ d - [?~-~ ~-~ 7. Date of Deliv ry _ ~ ' _ ~ p - 8 re~see's Address PS FORM 3800 - . - - - +~ .- fyi3 requested and fee paid.) ~ 6. Signature: ( dressee orl,{,,A~\g~ent) , _ • °' 'r- PS FORM ~, January 7996. ..a - `~~-;-[3o estic Return Receipt - - -- .._ ._ . - .. _ . -_. --- u ~ SENDER: -- w ~ I • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for adtlttional services ~~~~~ ~ ~~- I also wish to receive the -- 1 =PGnt - following services (for an extra fee): - year name antl address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card I I P~"GE ' t0 ~~ RETURN 1. ^ Addressee's Address A~ FESS C • AGach this Farm to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not ermit. 7 RECEIPT _^- Restucied.DellVery cERTIREDr • h1ie~Recelpt well show to whom the article was delivered antl th SERVICE ' e date tleiveretl. COnSUt postmaster for fee. fTl ~ ~gT~ Cle Addressed to: ~oTA~ Pos - 4a. Article Number m SENT TO: t;~_._ rgp~a s ' P 963 36~,~53 '~ ~~~ -`~ ~+ __ 4b. Service Type m ~r'9~ Hart1 tt~ Lis .~ 4;',: 3?'?_3:i I ~~~` ~~' ~ CERTIFIED t CS,~-~i-W _ ri' ~___ _- _ 7. Date o eli ~' S. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Address ;,: - ~ (ONLY if requested and fee paid.) PS FORM 3800 ~b: Signature: ( lassee_oc6geni - X PS FORM .~ ,j _ ry 1996 __ _,_,,~ -, -_ ~ - - -.D_Otj"Ie$t!C Return ReCBIDt ~.,_,,,_~.~ - -- - ~.-~-S~NDER;ems t and/or 2 for adddional seances ~ I also wish to receroe the t aosTACE • following services (for an extra fee I P~rint your name aM addr ssyo-theseverse=of_tbis_form so that-we can 2tum this card ) I RETURN sNOw Tn w>.-°yot u. 1. ^ Addressee's Address ADDPESS eF-~ RECEIPT - AGach Ihis form to Ne front of the mailpiece, or on the bazk if space does not permit. 2. ^ RestriCted Deivery SEPVICE cE WIFlED FE+ • TlteRetuenAeceipt will show to whom the article was tleliveretl antl fhe date delivered. s To1A~ PosrAC Consult postmaster for fee. u7 3. Article gddresssed_to~ rrt SENT TO: no - - - - - - .Article Number ,a P 963 361 354 -n c..~..s 3.12:34 iM. 33;t# m ~. ~Y+~` ~ 4b. Service Type 11258 W. ~'~"°~ ~l.:x;'=: ~"'., '?itt3 m +~ Rir'4 - - '- ~ CERTIFIED ~ _ ~' ~ -_ ~_ ~!.'~~~..~ 7. Dat of eliver m E ~- , ><~-r - ~"~~"'~ ~„5, Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Address .r PS FORM 3800 ~-- . - - - - -- (ffNLYi requested and iee paid) ~.6_Signafu e: (Addressee sr Aoent) X !+r=P33 FORM 1 1, - -+!^~~s-~=- t. SENDER: ~.~ .:---~_• Complete items t and~or z ror additional services. I also wish to receive the .Lo~~n"~na car,r~cPs.(S~r arLe~tCa.tee.)~_ ' • not your name an a ress on a reverse o Is orm sp_ we. ~an_re urn __ is you P~~° w _ t. ^ Addressee's Address - RETURN RECEIPT . q~e -• Altach this torm to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does nol permit. - - -- -- - - - 2. ^ REStrlCted DEVefY_ - - -- SERVICE cE • T}ie Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered antl the date tlelveretl. COnsUt pOSfmaSter f°r fee. - - ~ rr-~ArttCrA7f red sr~ o: 4a. A - _ _ _ rticle Number s m SENT To: ~~ _ P 9 6 3 3 61 3 9 9_-__-_ ~ =- ---.~,~~~ '~i. ~~ rlyta3i.iya - - 46. Service Type m fir` ~~edt ~~AS ~~ '?~.;3 ~ CERTIFIED ~ Wit , 0-. _-~- ~.,_~ i,~ - 7. Date of qel very l~ ,gR. l_ '1'~.C'~ IS (~.~` 5. Received By: (Print Name) ) r~-' - f Stl ressee's Address 4~ ~ j Y rf requested and fee paid.) PS FORM 3800 g, Signatu :Addressee or Ag t) ~ - ~ __s . _ - -_ _ _ _ _ __. _ BPS FoR 381.1, January 1s9s _, _ .E. _ ` gomestic Return Receipt ~'~ - - ~._._-~..=-_-_. e. SENDER - - °°",-_ - -. _ - i -m~i~ltems~ m~^• o s+ r~uianaLSea,,:icas_~....~__.._._;_ _ _ I also wish to receive the ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ (ollgwibg services (for an extra fee): - .- "flr' I n ~Ur name antl atltlress on the reverse of this form so that we canreturn this P°sT"'~-, ro ~cu. _ card 1. O AddresSee s Address I RETURN __ . &+OVt • Adaph this Corm to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back it space does rwt permit. ADpRE _ _ _ 2. ^ RBSirlCted DeVery RECEIPT - - ~Rez uTrn F~ipt wi I show t~cle was delivered and the tlate delivered. CE~I~ -- COnSUt pOStmaSter fOr fee. o SERVICE - TOIL ; _ -' a Addressed to: 4a. Article Number In m SENT TO: -„~ ~~ z1f,., ~ __ _ P 963_ 361 350 -- -- a ~ ~ -- - ~ ~'~ ttX.JkJ'~'~ ~ 4b. Service Type m _ 3x26- A , CERTIFIED m 4~a:.. t r,~..:37_3 -n Q.. - ---- - _ - ~ 7. Date of Delivery f-- ~~ y~ ~ '~ -6: Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Addrer - _ ~ (ONLY i7 requested and tee paid.) _ - _ - -- ~~ G--~~ 1'S FORM 3800 ~~nature: ress~~) _- 1 ;' s ~'PS"t=ORM - 11,, J~nuar :19,9,6 - , .-_ ~^°"^•.-.--^. - TDo~-~~~:~~€'erQQlpt- ---=,v=,.L. - - - -- :_rR.:-.---..~~£ampe[Ee terns t aMror z for additional services. -- _T --. I also wish to receive the l I - ~ ~ - n -y°arrta e a ress on ,~revers~ ~s +orm so that we can return Inls wrd aosr 'following services (for an extra fee): I RETURN tp i00 - - _ _ _ .~-_^-Addressee's Address RECEIPT ~o = ~A~~ this form to the front of the mailpiece, or °n the back if space does not perm t - - - ~-^-Restricted_Deiver_y SERVICE ° TfieAeturn Receipt will show to wham the article was delivered aM the tlate delivered. CERT _ - ConSUlt pOStmasfer fOr fee. ~ In __ TOTS -A' fear r~ t°' -_ _---_----____. 4a. Article Number m SENT TO: ~ ~;c~X't P 9 6 3 3 61 3 51 _ r~ - t~ - 4b. Service Type "T 3281 m dt ~. ~~; i^/ CERTIFIED ^- ~ - - - 7 ate of Deli r / n' '~: Received By: ( ri Name) ressee's Address _ ~~ (ONLY if requested and fee paid.) P°$ FORM 3800 ~6-.Signet - tlres r Ag J _ -. .a~~..,,.~~~ _r-_- ~ . _..3 = y`__, ar~ _ .. _ _--- - - Ic Return.Receipt . ~ -- . - - _ - - ~ SENDER: - - ~•--c _.-^..~~~.- - ~~,Cgmptete nem5-7.,apd/or 2for additional services._____- ___..__ _..._ (also wish to receive the RETURN RECEIPT ~ SERVICE m a -A, m m C d In your name an a ress on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card ~ fOllOwing Services (for an extra fee): ' PosTAGE t2you 1. ^ Addressee's Address SROw To Wb • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece or on_the_back If space does not ermit _ _-_ _ A^^RESSO _ _ _ __ _ __ _ p -_2.-^ Restricted Delivery cEF'fIFIEp FEI The Return Receipt will show to whom the art Ge was delivered antl the tlate delivered. QQpsUC postmaster for fee. rout Posue "XRi^le~ddressed o 4a. Articlesumber _ Npl"°~ L~-"~su~::.3t'a<_~ P 9_63_361 3~L6 ~i717. ~',~ ~'~~ ~~ ~ 4b. Service Type ~~~~ ~~~ ~ CERTIFIED twat Rf ,-,~,7-3 - 7. Date of D li vy~ _ "FMS FORM 3800 POSTAGE M1 S m a m m o-. RETURN RECEIPT SERVICE W€~eac _~ ?' oZ - S. Ric ved By: (Print N 8. Addressee's Address ~' ~" ' "-'--- ---- (ONLY r/ requested and fee paid) ~ mature: ddresseeiorr4gerH) - - - - By: S. Addressee's Address (ONLY it requested and tee paid.) - - '..+ t ~ ~_ SENDER: - • Complete items t and/or 2 fpr additional services. also wish to receive the iPrmt your name and adtlress on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card following services (for an extra fee): - ~ y00' --- -- - t. ^ Addressee's Address '-i taEha6islorlniolhe-front of the mailpiece, or on the back 'rf space tloes rwt pe-mil. 2. ^ RBStrlCfed D@hVery ~ The Aeturn Receipt wiil~ypyr_tosahomlha~rLde_wasdelivered-and the date delivered. ~~- -ArFrcJe Addressed to: Consult postmaster for fee. I _ ~~t~le~lumber TDTAL P_osmc.== -- ;,i P 9 6 3 3 61 3 4 7 _---s NoT = '"" •A *- ~~ ~ ~ 46. Service Type ,~ ',~ = ~~ ~,~ ~ ~ CERTIFIED ~~ ~ ~ ~`- 7 Date of eliver 1'S FORM 3800 j "'6'° "°""°'r '°'° Uamestic Return Receipt ;.~ ' z_ . .. - ~~ ~ -- `s--.--- _ I SENDER: ~ ~ ^ ..~._ _. ~ ._ .._.. _.~_ @ _'=_- --- - • Cpmplete items rand/or 2for additional services. I also wish t0 receive the -~-~~~ ~.-><+e,-,~,- ~ .•Print following services (for an extra fee): your name and adtlress on the reverse of this form so that we can return This cartl - -TOSjrou. 1. ^ Addressee's Address I PesiAGE I RETURN !Attach-6his_form_to_1MJrontpf~he mailpiece, or on [he back if space tloes not permit 2. ^ Restricted DeIlVery srlaw m t_- A^^RESS c _ ~-fhe Fe u~Receipt 'll h t h th rt I s_Uef&eced_apol6e~ale_tlelivemtl RECEIPT -- -(-.OnSUIt postmaster for fee. 'l S m a _o m PrI .D lr G SERVICE TOTAL P 963 361 348 ~$~ ~ ~ CERTIFIED Gam'--9;_y F~att R$_ 7. of livery ~~,. s , f ~i`~3 5. Received By: (Print Name) n 8. 's Address ,~ ~ r - ~ ~ ~ t.t+ v L .(( it quested and lee paid.) PS FORM 3800 j X ~ti V ~ / _ R ~.. 13SFO~rJr3$'11, January teas - , I 1 1 1 :.. ~ 4 .. ,_ .~ , Dotnes#ic RetuKniReceipt r _ _ - ENDER: ~-~ I also wish to receive the PosTACE r RETURN • Ccmptete_itams t anaror z br aaaltional services. .following services Ifor an extra fee): slrow To ww • Print ur name and address en the reverse of fiis /orm so that we can return this card aODRESG Of Yc ^ Addressee's Address 7 _ - - _ _ - - - -- __ RECEIPT - - tayour _. CERTIFIEDFE SERVICE •dttaclifhis_fprTlp the front of the mailp'ece or on the back if space does not permd. _- . - 2. ^ ReatrlCted DelVery ~ ~ TOTAL FOSTat ~ TFre Return Receipt will show to whom [he article was tleliveretl and the date tlelixretl. CORSUt pOStmaster for fee. m SENT TO: " I"ROr 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number P 9 6 3 3 G~37 6 -- o y~.r~S.t~ta :3. c~I1.,aY~ r+" ~~ ~ -~~ i T m ~ l ~~I;~ {~t~ cyt~ ~Q .T93k2tt ~ 46. Serv ce ype m i~LEt4t rr' t _ -~' "' ~-1•a33 ~ CERTIFIED .,v ~ _- ~97~~ f.~sl~v7- i 7. Date o ~iv@r - n - 5 Received Bv: (Print Name) 8. Add ssee's Address - (ON[1Ti r~~ and fee paf .~ ~~ PS FORM 3800 gnature: (Addressee or Agent) ~fi ~S - X -._. __. ____"__._.._.L-- O r L PS FORtvf 3~7 1 ~ anuary__i55s ' _ , : ; ' ._ ~ ' 'Domestic Return Receipt - - _ _ I ~ J I „ t POSTAGE ._ _ P e e I ems a or 2 for additional services. ~ - _~~T~ Rat four name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this RETURN scow To w T -- - - 50 w15 o receive fhe following services (for an extra fee): M HCC w t ^~.dd RECEIPT ADDRESSOF6 to YOU. ~e~see_'S:9ddreSS..._. SERVICE GERnRED FEE' .'Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. p, ^ Resfrioted D21VeC4 _ ..0 ~ ~ e-Return RecelTl1rshow to whom the article was delivered and the date tleliveretl TOTAL POSTAGE - , COnsUlt pOStmaSter fOr fee m SENT TO: INS., ~ Tce FcT resse o: 4a. Article Number I a - ~°1tx,L~ P 963 361 366 m i ~ .~e~=i ~~`~.i~17. ~ ~tl 4b. Service Type ~ YiMa+ e+$=•f~3t ~t~.:ics"'1s >,~.T 'sR 3',~ m ~ ~~ _ ~ CERTIFIED o- _ _ ,.. , 7. Date o4 D'elivQry ~ - ~ _3 s 5. Received By: (Print Name) - 8. Addressee's Addres PS FORM 3800 - ~ -- -- - i requested and fee paid.J Signa re: (Addressee or Agent) -'~--- -- V- - FS i=6RM 811, n ry, f s96 , :. , ~ , : - - I- . _ Dgme~tjc Return Receipt SENDER: _ .._, ~COmplete items r ana(or 2 for_ap5lifionatsayvmas. _,._ , ~ _ .._ aLq wish to receive the I 1 ~" ~ '-~ "-` "`" - - - " ~ -r~ e~ua.adtlressAn_theseverse-of this form se that we can return this -following services (for an extra fee): wrd I POSTAGE '- tc you RETURN - tea,^~ddressea's Address snow To wl-, ac Is rm to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. RECEIPT PDGRESS Of 7 2. ^ ReStrlCted DeilVery : he Return Receipt will show to wham the article was delivered and the date tleliveretl. SERVICE 'I CERTIFIED FEY -- - ~ d C.OnSUIt pOStmaSter fOr fee uT ~e-ed ~ resaed~o~ . ~ roTAL PosrAP-`---- _ - - - _ - - - - - 4a. Article Number m SENT TO: oce- P 9 6 3 3 61 3 4 5 '~ '~ ~-- JGII'11 ~d3.t. - _ 4b. Service Type m ~~ ~'rTaatt Fj..:rjCii :3,? -37031 3204 i~S! ~ CERTIFIED Amt Ri: _.. ~Z'-;~i-~ ~~~ rf" .. ~~ 7. Dat eHv~y / I~ U d r ~~y 5. Received By: (Pdnt Name) 6 ~ , ~- 8. dressee's Address ` ;' __ ~ (ONLY N requested and fee paid.Z _ ~- -~. - __ 'fi-51- ature: ~ rd e~orA entl ~---- - ~ PS FORM 3800 ~ 9 - - _ - -- -- -~ - - -- - -_ X- . ~ ~~ 'o~3M $ _ 11, Ja ary_isss _ : -pQmestic Return Receipt m N m ra m m D" q r m a .~ m m n- d P05 PR:E RETURN SHOW rOv ADDRESS C RECEIPT LERTIFIED E SERVICE -----' - _ ;_ ~~- - ' - I also wish to receive the .~fg~~rsYOraddnionai services. -- - following services (for an extra fee): tame and aEdress on the reverse o is o at~c~s'etrrcn'tnis card- ~ p Addressee's Address form to the front of the mailpiece, ar on the back'rf space does rp[ permit. ~'~ ~ 2. ^ ReStrlCted DeGVery ReceiM will show to whom the article was deliveed and the date delivered. COrISUIt postmaster for fee. idressed to: - - ~I`cle Number - - - _---_- _-- --- _"-____-_ _-_-_-_---- - - n of ~~'~.." Z~~ ~~ ~'~ ~~ ~ ~~~z t~e~t Ri type CERTIFIED 7. Date of ~v~ li,- +~ 8. Addressee's Addy reY sls (ONLY if requested and fee paid.) ~_ --- Ql~'~ i ^-~ ~,~7„y- 5. Received By: (Prirrt Name) PS FORM 3800 ~e.~~, ,.anrarlrimacRe or, RETURN RECEIPT SERVICE -- -.. _ _ - t_" ~. SENDER ~ - I also wish to receive the .Complete items t arraior z ra addronal servkes following services (for an extra fee): ._ atldress on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this cartl ~ p Addressee's Address " , ~ ~- - _. - POSrAG • Attach this roan to Ina front of the mailpiece, ar on ~t sd•~C~do~ - e i. - - -2- ^ RBStrlCted Delivery sHaA'r .7j,e Retum Receipt wi s ow to o c swas- eliuFrraei-ara the tlate delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. IrS ADORES. -9a-Article Number cERrIFIE= - -Ice re o. ,. rorA~P~- _ - ..,- ~P 963 361 374 '~. I ~ tl?~:2 :3 ~~t.;,;_,="fi.'i~' ~ - - 4b. Service Type F. John-- +~tei~t R£c3~, ~ ~?hR33 ~ CERTIFIED Z~52 ~_ 7. Date of eliv `~ `~ Wheat ~- ?~-`'3''Y I \ ,. _- -I paid.) PS FORM 3800 21 1991 ~~ uom 12fi1 C lryg~~tyrsCCCINr BPS M 38~- , ,, January''-1 98 - ~~~.~-- I RETURN I RECEIPT ~ SERVICE m SENT ri .o m m D"' SENDER: I also wish to receive the ';.3Complete Hems fond/or z for adaitlonal services following services (for an extra fee): PLSTAGEC - n you =, - tl'~d'nte-reverse of-this form so that we can return this cab ~ p Addressee's Address sHOw To-~ ~~ ADDREES .Attach this form to fix front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space ces n 1 p~imf~ 2. ^ Restricted Delivery cERnREC .The Rewm Receipt wm snow to w pm ¢,e r ~c vas-d~~r€d-and-me date deil~ered. Consult postmaster for tee. rorn,_PO~3; article resse o: =4a-Article Number __ y" -P 963 361 375 N _ n ~ yr""` L811t~_-_. i:,CF%~".IR%J'..kf l'.+ i;'~2:.~. S55S DijC-- ~' 7~3 5. Received By: (Pnnf Name } PS FORM 3800 ',- 8. Signature: (A ressee or Amt ) X ~ l ~` ... - I . t„Q9 FOR1N 3811, January 1, _ - - - "A5-Service TYPe -_ _ -- -____-- CERTIFIED 7. Date of Deli ry - - 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY it requested and fee paid.) r _~ - ~.`-- I I RETURN Pte- D R: - ~!-Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. i • -,_ -' -- - - - --- I a150 Wlah SO receive fhe RECEIPT R Ac ni our nama_antl_adtl[ess-onthe reverse of this form so that we can return this °@ caM following services (for an extra fee): ~ sERwcE _ -Attach this form to the front pt me mailpiece or on th b k 1. ^ Addressee's Address m - -- , e ac if space does not permit T~ • -- Lshpwto wh th 2. ^ Restricted Deliv SENT TO: - om e artiGe was delivered and the date delivered. 3fAr-€~cle Addressed to:_ _ _ ery Consult postmaster for fee. r9 - _ - 4a. Article Number m ,Tc .• ` f'_ .7dizrs Ica P 9 6 3 3 61 3 7 0 ~'°- ' l- ~- ~Z$~~ I~' 3~~f "~^~ 4b. Service TYPe tit.. -.~~ wne~lt ~~a t'~ 3t3-'~33 Ir 3 - ~ CERTIFIED a ~ _ /rF~3,~fy° '~ f 7. Date of D mer - - f ?~ ~ ~~q - -- ceived.8.ys (Print Name ~ '~ - - - -- ------ -- ----- - - -- - - - ----- - PS FORM 38Q = - _ 8. Addresse 's Address _ - (ONLY if requested and fee yard) _,~~ e: (Addressee or Agent) Bey _ _ ___.__- ._,___- , °['~~~'QR1v13E11, January 1996 x= -. Domestic Return Receipt ~,°•° - n yaur name an atltlress on the reverse of this tar that RETURN m so we ran reWrn Ihis card ' ~y01~ 1. ^ Addressee's Address RECEIPT ~'Af7ac`R this farm to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit 2. ^ Restricted DelVery nl SERVICE ~T~ REaturn Receipt will show to wham the article was delivered and the date delivered. ~ t'.OnSUIt postmaster fdr fee. M1 m SENT TO: ~ ~_ Atldresse t ~ - __ - ,= xla.-Article Number = I~.ats kYc~ P 9 6 3 3 61 3 7 2 ~ o -~ xpt~j,a va!) ~'~`~? ~• - 4b. Service Type "T J65t3 _ - t r,~, e.~ st?'t3w -- m t'+~aeat ~ ~ CERTIFIED ~ - - Ir ~= - {,~~.3 i°~. 7. Date of Delivery °~~ -:.5_Received By: (Print Name) S. Addressee's Address - - ~ (ONLY if requested and fee paid.) P~ FORM 38c ,;~ ,,,__, _ , , , . -~ --_-_-~.-.---_~y-. =F 38.1 i, dams ry isss Domestic Return Receipt ._` - , _. _ ~._ -+.---~.T.~-=_~-..~,^-^-^°^=ENDER: -- - i - - _. -. I Po_- ,_ _e e_. ems__anther 2 for addabrel seances. also wish to receive the i RETURN ~,~ _~ Print your name and atltlress on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card following services (for an extra fee): RECEIPT A0" _ -~ ~'' . - _. - _--.-__ - -- _ --. _ -____ 1. ^ Addressee's Address cEF ~ this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. ~ SERVICE r'I}ie FCelurn Receipt will show to wham the article was delivered and the date delivered. 2. ~ RestrlCted DZIIVefy M1 Tar ____ dressed to --~~~--- _ _ Consult postmaster for fee. _ m - - - --..... _.. _ SENT TO: ~=_- -- ~~ - - ~ - 4a. Article Number _ r,~ -- -- ~ ~ ~%~-~ .,qty - P 9 6 3 3 61 3 71 rT) ~"a~K'tj ~_~.~s~><7 k:. 3,'G: <.~le-r+:.~_ _ - 4b Service Type n I135C- { :~&x~;tt fti.:7ar Q_, arN]?.i n ~' '~ _ ?~ ~ CERTIFIED u- _ m _~ (~;~'`--~ ~.. j -~ 7. Date of Delivery ~i ~?~` 5: Received By: (Print me) ~ T 8. Addressee's Address PS FORM 380Q - -- ~.. - - - ~ (ONLY if requested and fee paid) Signature: (Addressee or Agerrl) „ V _~ -- _--- -_ _-_.__ __ _ ,-PSFnORM 381.1 a January, is~s , t t i , i ; t ; i ; ; i , , gor~~gtic Return Receipt - --- --r°SENDER: I also wish to receive the r~lete Gems 1 and o~of r ddiGOna seances. fOlOwing services (for an extra fBe): POSTAGE I RETURN sHaN ro wrlo • Pnnl your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card ro you. 1. ^ Addressee's Address RECEIPT AooaESS Of DE OERTIFIEp FEE+ ~ ~~ormF~o f~ro(T a mal piece, or on t e c I space oes not permit. 2. REStrlcted DEIIVer Y h SERVICE The Reurn Receipt will show to wham the article was tleliveretl antl the tlate delivered. COnSUIt pOSfmaSter for fee. ~ m --- SENT TO: TOTPL POSTAGE, IN u Nor Fa -'cleAddressed to: -_ - - 4a. Ar}icle Number P 9 6 3 3 61 3 6 7 ~ -- t~vi.: ai.i7~~r m ~~~ ~ - _ - ~SJ :FCAr3~.Z 8C. 4b. Service Type Sass s.a ~ _ :,~ ~.-~;~, ~ :~t~^~z~ .mn 5~s~~ Fddgeti CERTIFIED o^ 7. Date f D iv -~ t~"'g~ 3 5. Received By: (Print Name) S. Addressee's Addres I e-_ - 'PS FORM 3800 '~ - l L,L -(ONLY if requested and fee paid.) 6~S~ig/nature: (Addres a or Agent) - /~ Ps~oRta~81;1~:,>anuarv iss~ - -` -- - D- esf - efu~ri Recei t It I ..t .,I :. ilt t ~rlr n ~:,~r RR P ` `".~,~: yam; T~,..m.r ,d..._.._.....__'_._ -- - - - ~ _. - ~~,~ - - - __- -- . SEND I also wish to receive the ~.,-=z~-. .~. ~ .-complete Hems t andror z tar adda~onal services. ' - =following services (for an extra fee): ~ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so tnaz we can return this cab POSTAGE RETURN 1.^9ddreSSee~s~ddreSS RECEIPT SNOW TO Wrf AO°RESS OF-.:-Attach [his farm to the tram of the mailpiece or on the back d space tlees rwt oermit. ~' _^_RBStflCted hf! N SERVICE cERTIFIEO FE' • The Return Receipt will Show W whom the article was tlelivered and the date tleliveretl. COnSUt nOSimaSt re~ee ~ ~ TorA~ PosTAa. 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number_ __ m SENT TO: Nor'- _ _ P 963 361 368_ _ A 'a ~ ~ ~ - Z~ ~-z~i~:.- 4b. Service T pe y m ~i~ CSC i'~X?slt :1e;:~,s ~~} :3')^l3 33gg ~ _~ ~ CERTIFIED m ~ ~y,q ,~, ~~ _ ' ~ D" 7. DatergF,Delji~~r G ~ ` ~~~ ~ 5. Received By: (Prinf Name) - .. 8. Add#g ee~ Fes ~ - ~ ( it recy' S~Ed a _ e paid.) ' ,PS FORM 3800 =c-rn.,.,~.~ rn.~.r,,.,.,.,.,. , A,.,,...i _ 0.k' w~ ~ _ I I POSTAGE I RETURN gROµ, Tr ~~S` RECEIPT CERTIREI SERVICE 1 1.:ti~ _ .. z - - - -- _~~ _~ I ER: I also wish to receive the ate items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. _folio.wing_ser_vices_(for_anPxtea_fee) our name and~ress o~ r o eterp.~ s_C - ^ Addressee's Address this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit 2. ^ Restricted Delivery Itu[nRecei0.rwEl show to whom the artick; was delivered antl the date delberetl. QOnSUIi pOStmaster for fee. °-AO~e~e~O~ - -ria. Article Number ~ TOTPL PO5TA6` ® m N P 963 361 369 SENT TO: Ndr ~ - 3 < a°'~ 4b. Service Type i}-- trc`t =2~.a3'~€a• C~,` ` cA 7 I&~ ~'lrl~1 m . . .: . 3345 Si .T.t',S`- _ ~ CERTIFIED m ~ "" ' 7. Date o Delivery ~ ' _ ` 5. Received By: (Print Name) ~~ ' "'~ ,- J ~ 8. Addressee's Address ~ ~ ~fE4lrr1~ ~f,(- _ (ONLY if requesied and fee paid.) . --__--- _ 6. Ign re: ressee or gen PS FORM 3800 ? - - - 7`"; -1-9 F - - - - _ ,~, yLU.ef PS FORM ~81~- ,iJanliaKy isssi I , ,Domestic Return Receipt .. I - ~ -ENDER' - _ -- _ _ I also wish to receive the I POSTAGE -. Complple items 1 and/pr 2 for addnlonal services, I RETURN SH^'.N TO pint your name and atltlress on the reverse of this farm so that we can return this card ' follDWing aerVICE!s (fOr an extra fee): n^^RESSa ' 1. ^ Addressee's Address RECEIPT cERTIFIE^A -tojrou - SERVICE r- I ' fo f n f h mil iec or on the back if space does not rxl mii. _Q`^_R@sILIQ~e~ lVery 7 TOTPL POSR .The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was tlelivered antl the date delivered. CiOnSUt ostmaster for fee. .D _ IT SENT TO: H t Nq_3. Article Addressed to: ~ _ 4a. Article Number ,-a ~= P 963 361 364 fi7 '1~~'~f a+~^a+~ ~~~ I)r 1 ! i~~_~;~ 4b. Service Type ~ ~ ~~__ ~ CERTIFIED .a h- -- Q~y,,.~~,.- 7. Date -f Delivery G C~~37-3 ~n~ '.E - _ 5. Receiv d By: (Prnt fJamej S. Ad ressee' Add es PS FORM 3800 ~___.__ - - ~__~..~_.______.__._ _ r requeste an ee par . 6 -S__i - natura:-(Addressee or Agent) PS F RM 38 ,,.January 1996 .. ; _ _ ; . , . , _ DOmeSfIC Return ReCelpt ~STAGe ' SENDER: I also wish to receive the RETURN sNOVJ Tow- • Complete Hems t and/ofZtor addicwnal services. 55 0/ following services (for an extra fee): RECEIPT ADDRE _~ print your name antl address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this cartl ~~ ~. ^ AddreSSeOS AddreSS DERi1FIED F- fo ycu. t.i7 SERVICE TOTAL P0.ST. • Attach t w orm o e ron o fh~plece, oi~Ftlr€ I -SIJac~ ces not perms. ~- ^ ReStrlCted DellVery -® `- .YH€R~arrr a ei -ill show to wham the article was tlelivered antl the date deliveretl. U Consult pCStmaSter for fee. m SENT TO: tvo n e~Fl _ dcessed_te 4a r icle Number a ~ P 963 361 365 - ~ ~1 d C~k m _ Hri.llar 3~•l~ ~ .- ~ ~~• 4b. Service Type m ~ ~ i~r~3t ~,#x~,~, tS? ,;~'s3~ . o - ~ CERTIFIED ~, ... _ _ ' ~ ~~,'F3 F.- -,~~~ ~ - 7. Date o Delivery ~,;T,ee ived By: (Print Namej _ 8. Addressees Address PS FORM 3800 --: __- _ . ___~ (; `~ GQ ~~ (ONLY if requested and fee pard.) N~~ lure: (Addressee or Age _ !- P FORM 3811 January 1996 ~ r _ ~ _ ~. _ ~ t , t rDOnl28tiC Returli Receipt ' _ _ a---~ C)~ __ ~ ~~> l a- s ``~ ~~ ~~41f~LY. ~OI.n/Kf$S \cfr ~ u..o1dR,Ci S~/V ` b ~ ~E2V~ ~. Cale-rrt v.~ a~,,,~ _ cJ~1G~ aL~ov~. ~F~-rc~" of b~sea~~cc, ~r4n-es ~~P#~~nir~ ~Rcc.ess ~2-chi-~+nS pasr ,~ev+anon3~ (,J~~ 1'V1GUtr ice- ea'1S~JZ ~~~;1 ? ~o.~Q~,~;S~e ~iv,2(y • V~~~c:~aJ rye ,~laY, fZeJ,c,.~7 -- v.~~s -r-S,e.~~ ~ s:~-e ~la~ .v o t o ~~ c~piv~e. ¢sse,~,~ce. c~ ,rw_.i s~. bcv- ccn~ c2/~-4 `~ ~"?P~~c~,<r ~U.rc.~4s.ed ~a-y (Cacw+v5 eon--~ ~ ~ -E- d ~.GS\ .z.ZnR..CS ~ \~~ vp~S cper "~ C~~v~~/'2. 1. i ~ cY.~hd i ,SGi$`> ~ ~~~ v ~, ~-, ~Q ~~.~ernk -~,~.~ 510.<- :j- ets(- a "`~. 6 u~w ~a e de~~`~~c~ ~p~ s _ ~-~a 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~S r ' /r ~~ ~~ '"<<. .__.,~ ~~~ ~ ~ ,~ ,~ .F 4...,:,; -.r A . , .s:: d, ; --: c. ~ ~;,.~ , "~ V ~ ~ ~ ,,~~ ~. ~ JI- -M ~+_"1 IJF~~ _r s i/ `fl ~_ t '~ I~~Y ~' .f°!a ~~ ~ ~i t ~ w./ r~ 1. i ~ ./ ~ ~ _ 1 ~ ~~- ~~ M ~~ f~v ~~~ ~~ ~/ f ,~ V" y~ i ay _ '~~ 1` .~~ 4 .:: .....:._ ............ ..... ... .::::.....:::...:.. i ........................ ......................... ......................... ........................... ........................ •asaa®asuuuuuuuu~u• Applewood Baptist Church Apri127, 1997 Wheat Ridge Planning Commission City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-0638 Deaz Members of the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission: We the undersigned members of Applewood Baptist Church as well as residents of the City of Wheat Ridge wish to express our support for our church's plan to construct a baseball, field and volleyball pits on our property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. Applewood Baptist Church has been a part of this community since 1960 and have always been desirous of being good neighbors to those who live azound us. We view the construction of these athletic fields as part of our ongoing ministry to reach out to the young people of this community and respectfully request your approval of the Conditional Use Permit which will be before you on May 1, 1997. Thank you in advance for your thoughtful consideration of this matter. ~~ r 11200 W. 32nd Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • (303) 232-9575 • Fax: (303) 238-2513 Name Street Address Name ~ ~p / Street Address.-,~a~ ~.!~'.~i/.G~1~/_ /i~~,r~il/I.~fsf /f~~ G~ ,'1~S'~-' v~~ /~ c~~c~.~ ~i ~/~~.~S~f.c'Q-l4~c-~! ~ 4- fl.s r~~~~ . ,~YL'~l r .a%~JCT'7'ti. Jli b ~ ~~.2~- ~' RPR 30 '97 10~25flM URBAN DRRINRGE - P.114 4 ~Ax _ _, .: .:, .. ,,._. I Date April30 1997 TO: Meredith Reckert Phone I NumDerofpaaesincludinacoversheet 4 FROM: Dave Uoyd UDFCD 2480 West 26th Avenue Suite 15G-8 Denver, CO 80211 Phone 303-4b5-6277 CC: REMARKS: ^ ..Urgent ® Foryourreview ^ Rep1yASAP ^ Please Commenf Meredith -Didn't know if you had received a copy of this. Apparently, it has been distributed around the neighborhood. ~~ 4-30-APR 30 '97 10~25AM URBFN DRAINAGE BgPTIST CH 303 238 2573 P.2/4. 2 '% - APR 30 '97 10~09AM a THE PEACEFUL CHARACTER OF OUR NEIGHSORgQOp IS ABOUT TO CHANGE PLEASE HELP PREVENT THIS On Apn7 10, 1997, the Applewood Baptist Church held a Neighborhood Meeting. They discussed, their itrteauion to apply for a conditional use permit for a baseball diatnoad and volleyball pit at their property on the north side of W, 32nd Avenue. On April 14, 1997, despite strong neighborhood opposition to the existing proposal, the Church submitted an application for a conditional use pemrit to the Wheat Ridge Planning Office. The Wheat "Ridge Elsnning Conamnlssiort un'g hold a pablic bearing to "bear" support or opposiGee to the perairt request The ineetiag is scbedakd for Thursday May t, 7:30pm st the Municipal Campte=, 7500 West 29th Aveaue in Wheat Ridge. Per Ms. Meredith ReckeR, a City Planner, the Wheat Ridge Planning Office intends to recomtnettded approval of the Church's conditional use permit. Their recommendation has already been given to the Plateoing Commission that w7l "heat" the case on May 1. There are many troublesome issues associated with the Chtttcti's Proposal, most important is preserving the quiet, serene character of our neighborhood. The neighbors who attended the April i 3 meeting were g1I opposed to the issuance of the petnrit at this time, largely because the Church had made ao cotnnritments in writing and their verbal proposal contained several significant flaws. Because the Planning Office is recommending ixsuauce of the conditional use permit, the only way we can atop approval on May 1 is for our neighborhood to attend the pahic bearing and voice our opposition. betters and phone calls to the planning Office may hdp, but nh`imately we need a Vs~T ]area *_±.r±~o._.* oa May 1. We need yoar presence. Please take a few moments to fautiliarize yourselfwith some ofthe very important issues at stake. If this conditional petarit is approved, every homeowner is the Applewood. area wtll be impacted" Mr. Glen Gidtey, Senior Planner for the Wheat Ridge Planning OflSce, submitted a recommendation that the Planning Commission approve the Church's conditional use permit request. However, Mr. Gidley .did not personally attend any of the three pub&c meetiggs held in the past two years. Ms. Beckett, a planner from trfr, Cridley's office, did ahead these meetings and told the community -both at the most recent public meeting and dtuing telephone nails following, the matting -that the neighborhood's concerns were valid and were not property addressed by the Applewood. Baptist Church. Ms. Beckett also stated she would recommend that Applewood Baptist Church delay their request for a public hearing with dte community coueerns bad bey p~a4B Commission ut-ril with Ms" Reckert's recontrnendations and the pubh hearing was orushedthe ~ ~. ~~ ~~ May 1 docket as requested by the Applewood Baptist Church. The Church's desire to eonstruct anti use these facilities this summer is the reason for the urgency. Ia a foIIow up telephone tali to inquire about why the public hearing was being held May i, Ms. Redcett explained that Applewood Baptist Church offi~aals stated: "the neighbot3tood is not going to like anything we propose, so we have decided to proceed despite ym,r (Ms. Becken's] recommendation not to trove forward with the permit appligtion.'° This statement clearly shows Applewood Baptist Chtuch's lack of regard for the opitrioas of our residential community. Taken by itsel>; the Church's request for recreational facilities appears harmless; maybe evert lice. However, is the context of ttte Applewood Baptist Church Master Plan, the recreational facilities are one of several stepping , a-30-RPR 30 '97 10~26RM URBRN DP,AINRGE BAPTIST CH 303 238 2513 P.3i4'.3 "`, APR 30 '97 10=09RM stones to prepare this open-space property for Coastnecdon of the religious campus. The Church's Master Plan, presented daring a February 22,1996 Neighborhood Meeting, iaciydes construc8oa of an additional education building, an auditorium and a cathedral with seating capacity for 1,000 is addition to eaistiag facilities. The Master PLsrt, scheduled to begin iA the next few years, wal permanently change our neighborhood into a busy, trat~c-congested campus. Please evaluate the request for recreational fac0ities not only in teems of immediate use, but in the content of the Applewood $aptist Church Master Ptah. It is not a coincidence that the site of the recreational facilities is also the planned future location for the auditorium and cathedral. The Applewood Baptist Church's permit application is their second request to put recreational facilities on their property. Whr1e the current proposal is a scaled down version of their Stst request presented at a July 1996 Neighborhood Meeting, the Applewood Baptist Church stilt has yet to address neghborhood concerns. The Church has ao comprehensive, written plan for managing ttcreatioaal facilities oa their property, nor have they solicited orused commsaity ideas in the preparation of their proposals. Thereceat Neighborhood Meeting to "discuss' their proposal nuns a Sue-miwte announceatetn of what they were planning to do. The chnrch Lad no solutions t0 neighborhood coacerna about: voice pollutioa, 5ght pollution, . tratffiC control and Coagestioa, tretpsssing onto private property, sanitation, waste mansgeauat; uaauthoriud facr7ity use. destruction otw7dl~e habitat, security, neeglebor6ood complaints, snpervlsioo, maintenance, hoots ofoperatioa, orva>4dalism. There a several items is the Applewood Baptist Chruch proposal that sit residents should be aware of; as follows: • Applewood Baptist Church intends to offtx use of these facilities to Jefferson Conaty public Schools and poteatiaNy other public and private groups. Members oftlrese groups do not live is our nei~tbotitood. This will increase traffic congestion on born W. 32nd Avemte and is our aeigitborhood. Increased trdfTt: wngestion ~Y ~~nia11Y mesa the transfortoation of W. 32nd Avenue taro a four lane throughway. If the details of these arrarrgea-etas have not been clarified in writing before the perarit is issued, the Church will have ao re~iCtions in the futon oa who can use this field. Recreations! activities will be permitted seven days a week uatr~ to:o0pm and will require the addition of several lance high-powered tights. pvr neighborhood youth go hotae what it gets dark outside and then our neighborhood quiets down - it would seem mote appropriate for the Chtuch to foIIow fire code of the residential are. The light pollution already emanating fiotn the church garldng tot lights washes out our evening sky. Applewood Baptist Church has ao plans for sound hollering. The quiet, senate character of our neighborhood is is jeopardy. If noise buffeting is not inCltrded in the perarit before is is approved, the Church has no obligation to do aayttriag about noise after they receive the permit. The use of these facilities by public and private groups could mesa noisy afternoons, evenings and weekehds year round. larergeney access to the Sells will be a requitement of the Wheat Ridge Plaarugg Ofiice_ Most likely the proposed path, will be coasYtttcted through the wetland area neighbors are ttytng to preserve for the reataioing wildlife in out comnnmity. Corutruction of the gravel access wt~l requite further g[adittg/5ffaig. Applewood Baptist Clsuch wiz! not apes their building resa'oom facilities to anti-ehrrrch groups. Without appropriate facilities, users wilt be forcod to use sturaaulmg yeas and shrubbery. 2 d-30-RPR,30 '97 -10~27RM URBRN DRAINflGE BAPTIST L;N 303 238 2513 P. 4/4'. Q '_ APR 30 '97 1H=09AM Appiewood Baptist Church will bring in portable sanitary faciifies if the recreational area will be used by a church desigsrated group for longer than three hours. Port '0 Potties are unsightly, potettriaily unsarrizary, a target for vandalism umil removed, attractive to undesirable wildlife, and require large vehicles to move them in anti ont"of an area. Applewood Baptist Church will ctinsuva a high, locked fence around the baseball field to prevent unauthorized use. Applewood Baptist Church has no plans for security of the fields (a potetitiai "!tang out" for local teenagers and access route to several backyards. Ifthe conditional use permit is granted without provisions for sectttizy, the Church is under no obligation to provide security in the • Appiewood Baptist Church will professionally maintain the fields. Professional mainzeaanee typically includes pesticides and fertilizers thaz wilt be washed down gradient irno the nearby wetland and drainage area leading into Lena (hrich. Oar neighborhood has maintained a high stApdsrd of residential living trat lots! Lowing prigs now tt8ect TLese standards include a weU~kept, quiet, soburbaa neighborhood thsi if safe foe as, oar children and oar lp'sndebildmn,to live and pl=y ia. The "ideal" ofonr aelghborttood dam pot iaclnde a busy religions campas with tralTu toogestion, noise pollution, sad the many otter management problems associated witL tLis type of project As adjacent property owners and neighborhood residents, many of us have experienced ongoing diffiwlties with Applewood Baptist Church activities, including: parking problerrn for auseives and our guests; noise in the early motn~, fate evening and on wet9cendS; trash and leaking orator o1~ on our properties; cars speeding out of the parking lots attd through our neighborhood streets; horns honking and car radios blaring,, gad itxreased traffic congestion oa W. 32nd Avenue and in our neighborhoods. Applewood Baptist Church officials have stated that the Church has asked patishiottets to respect ttie sutrouadiag neighborhood, but they also added that tine Church can do no more than "ask." We wt71 certainly add to these problems if the recreational facilities are approved, gad will have even Beater problems if the Applewood Baptist Church Master Piau moves forward 'Thank you for your careful consideration ofthese issues. Your presence at the May 1 Public hearing could meant the difference in quality of life in our neighborhood. 3 Y ~ i k CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: May 1, 1997 DATE PREPARED: April 22, 1997 CASE NO. & NAME: CUP-97-31Applewood Baptist CASE MANAGER: "Meredith Reckert ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit LOCATION OF REQUEST: 11225 W. 32nd Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32nd Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32nd Avenue ~t, APPROXIMATE AREA: n/a ' --~u~^__~------ ~ ~ • ~ PRESENT ZONING _._~ V ~ __ j PRESENT LAND USE: -- SURROUNDING ZONING: -~ ~-_-__ - - r. SURROUNDING LAND USE: N: Lena Gulch; S: Church; ' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: DATE PUBLISHED: April 11, 1997 DATE POSTED: April 17, 1997 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: April 17, 1997 ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN () (X) ZONING ORDINANCE () () SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) () OTHER CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS SLIDES EXHIBITS .JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. Planning Division Staff Report Page 2 Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church I. REQUEST Pursuant to Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Section 26-6 _ In accordance with these provisions, the royal of a ~ conditional use permit to allow the - _ __-a~~~i_~_A~~ ~..h=.t~t~1~ ~_ a a church. It is the ' _ secreatrQ.n ~e&ultt:S as art minutry,_however-; BeEvely~ of (located on 32nd Avenue west of the Wheat Ridge city limits) would be using the baseball e o Attached is a site plan provided by the applicant. Staff has suggested some improvements to the site plan pursuant to Exhibit `A'. Included also is supplemental information provided by the Church regarding some of the issues and questions raised at the neighborhood meeting under Exhibit `B'. N The _ ._ „~ . ~~.~ ~?c~~-~ ~-i~ -..~~l.~~t~a_ u-w;- ~~~e City of Lakewood, across from the subject property. A - `_ ar Built in the mid-SO's) aze located on the north = Another pazking lot to ~we~t was approved as a condifional use an _~ ,~ II. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A meeting for neighborhood input was held o - hose attending included the following: Meredith Reckert -City staff Gary Wazdle -City staff David Lloyd -applicant Trevor Bron -applicant Lee Loyd -applicant Bryan Weimer -applicant Sherry and Ross Izalc - 3204 Quail Street JoAnn James :3223 Pierson Street Artie Gibbazd - 3415 Quail Street David R. Cole - 3050 Quail Street Susan Paddock - 11027 West 31st Avenue Duane Chesley - 3261 Routt Street Tom Bert 3281 Routt Street Robin Clu•istians - 3159 Robb Circle George E. Hank - 3294 Quail Street Wil Sugai - 11 l58 West 33rd Avenue Dolores Archer - 3260 Routt Street Debbie and Ralph Perri - 1090 Holland Street Planning Division Staff Report Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church Jeanette Patrick - 1143 West 32nd Avenue Pat Bray - 3065 Quail Street Mary Louise and Sylvester Rohr - X298 Quail Street Phyllis and Ed Watlington - 10961 West 30th Place Dave DiGiacomo - 3275 Quail Street ????? Hartline - 11151 West 32nd Avenue The following concerns were expressed: Page 3 -Why the previous plan showing soccer fields was not pursued? Why is this amended request being proposed when the church knows the neighbors object? rd-public or private entities? -Whether any of the Planning Commission aze members of the church? -Whether th - now or in the future -Would there be ' -Would ,~~:nm„-:~;~r~~a~9~,e available? There was concern expressed because some of the children after Sunday school were seen urinating outside -What would be the days and hours of use? -C iced on a conditional use approval -Is any eing proposed? -What is e s a us o the church's ecrrr+*+a4r~nlan? If this is approved, would it be a "foot in the door" for future approvals? -Although the new parking lot has been built + +~ s a r+r 1'em for those residences on Robb Circle behind the main church building. Fireplugs and driveways are still being blocked by those attending services. -The side of the education is - d' -Are there any assurances o the church being a good neighbor if the field goes in? -What aze the ~ - c ? -What is the ~ ~'~ balls breaking windows? -The possibility or the church to hire someone or use volunteers to have the during high-use periods? -Will the __P ra±cr Where will it drain? -The neighbors feel that the church misrepresented their intent to raise (place fill dirt) the new parking lot -The fact that there is already too much s -- venue- -- -The issue of _ san on +acen ,nropczfiies -Will the new detention pond be fenced? It could be an attractive nuisance to children in the azea? -IfcF~'''Femiir - the field, will they be charged? How - ev nrac ice? How - er. a-. "- ow manv _~~tlr4perty~ What is the ~rn-°`~rnrerval?~ -Will thudl~ "att t-"~'~'-ig f' - , How Pv e u ?Will they be used by formal leagues? -Could the o ~ e Put "^_..a-=~^.~etP_~-.ct,,,.° Planning Division Staff Report Page 4 Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church -The fact that the church has not attempted to respond to the same issues raised the last time and perhaps they should come back with a more specific proposal. Included under Exhibit `C' aze written responses received in regazd to the proposal. III. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria to evaluate a Conditional Use Permit. WiII not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed conditional use will al cun•ently vacant w111 now have a baseball fie a be no affecton the neighborhood. There will be ecause property which is be wrong to say there will Avenue which will have „ ~ - tv~ng~te=azea. There will be its and _ _ ~ ~ residents, as well. 2. Will not adversely affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution. Construction of the new recreation facility will - t aii to adiac~ properties as there will be ___ ass; There will be in the am~.~.++*r..a'-~,ptJt~-r,~ - [he site which will ir~~=a~~P-~P-anznriut-of-r~cv pollution in the area. To mitigate some of the noise, staff has recommended that a 6' high solid fens extended north along the western property line past the northern edge of the ballfield improvements. 3. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates desirable land use for the property ar •s-an n_ pare church and associated accessory uses aze considered r--y->,~_ ,~-^'v ~'^J'°°*'t'n*'.bt-`t-„a,°~!^~,. ^* The City has not pursued ... _ ""'.an~`°3r ~trcpac-~-onl5isgco_pett~r. Since the underlying - e~' zoning will not change, consistency with gram"-f~'~. The use of the area as ~`(d be considered __• __ _ c ,_~n-fin. d. Will not result in undue traffic congestion'or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off the site. There will obviously be - - '- venues creation of the fields, o t an t ~eststtpg, paved and striped Planning Division Staff Report Page 5 Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church to - e cess with abreak-away chain must be pro t e ass -own 6n' to s site p an. 5. Will be appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. ~, _ :Some attempt at ~ = 'acent properties must occur on at least the e bulk of the activity will occur in -a -are .Staff would recommend that at least a - i - of-landsea id-fence be extended north past the detention pond to the _ - - se all field improvements 6. Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. Approval of the conditional use will service to the property. There will be mg agcnc~es can prove" g ~ -here will be ctioats because no new dwelling units would result as approval of the conditional use. There would be a ' a aaceon a_ 1 '"'Tilt currently has no baseball fields. There will be csas- a e'ui•c~' is providing it's own recreation facility. IV. AGENCY REFERRALS a a -District can serve subject to the company's rules and regulations. mments or concerns. is rift wifl~eoaire eme access-tathe baseball field. _~~ raixta stud -anda-fill- mit-' r They aze requesting the - c -r~s for cazs exiting the site. V. STAFF CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes a church. a following conditions: Planning Division Staff Report Page 6 Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church 1. The -vs a -pits limited to use by the e - aelyn= Z. At the least, - _stnp -' g be built from the reaz of the ~ - of north to the end of the baseball field improvements. 3• That '~ ~ rovided from the north side of the western pazking lotto the baseball field. This emergency access shall be 20' wide, hard surfaced with turnaround and gated to allow emergency and maintenance vehicles only. 4. A p ~}}~ s;_ as all field to the education building for access to restrooms. 5. That th anP or e rl~ced to eliminate conflicting taming movements onto West 32nd Avenue. 6• , c or 'be allowed. 7• ~ ~ on the baseball field and lights for the volleyball pits remain off when not in use and be fumed off by 10 p.m. when in use. Such lights shall conform to requirements of Zoning Code Section 26-30(S) regarding mitigation ofoff-premises impacts of outdoor lighting. 8. The - - - i ect}~rt Exhibit `B' regazding use, hours, and maintenance. VI. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. CUP-97-3, a request by Applewood Baptist Church for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a baseball field and three volleyball pits for property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: I. A conditional use permit is required to allow the constmction of these amenities. 2: The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. There will be minimal impacts to the neighborhood if proper buffering and controls are used. 4. Staff recommends approval. With the following conditions as recommended by Staff: 1. The field and volleyball pits be limited to use by the church.and De'Evelyn, 2. At the least, a 6' high solid fence with a 10' strip of landscaping be built from the reaz of the western parking lot north to the end ofthe baseball field improvements. 3. . That emergency access be provided from the north side of the westem pazking lot to the baseball field. This emergency access shall be 20' wide, hazd surfaced and gated to allow emergency and maintenance vehicles only. 4. A path be provided from the baseball field to the education building for access to restrooms. 5. That [he curb cut to the western parking lot be closed to eliminate conflicting turning movements onto West 32nd Avenue. Planning Division Staff Report Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church Page 7 6. No PA system, concessions or bleachers be allowed. 7. No lights be allowed on the baseball field and lights for the volleyball pits remain off when not in use and be turned off by 10 p.m. when in use. Such lights shall conform to requirements of Zoning Code Section 26-30(S) regarding mitigation ofoff-premises impacts of outdoor lighting.. 8. The applicant abide by the information provided in Exhibit `B' regarding use, hours, and maintenance. Option B: "I move that Case No. CUP-97-3, a request by Applewood Baptist Church for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a baseball field and three volleyball pits for property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. ExFtlB!> `$ ~ APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH 11220 West 32nd Avenue Lakewood, CO 80033 April 14, 1997 Meredith Reckert Planning Department City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 Re: Applevvood Baptist Church -Conditional Use Permit Dear Ms. Reckert: Please find enclosed our Administrative Process Application along with a check for the $100 filing fee. As a result of our neighborhood meeting on April 10, 1997 and the comments and concerns that were expressed at that meeting, we would like to offer the following response to those comments: 1. Will there be supervision by the church when the fields are in use? The church plans to have a church representative present at all times in which the fields are being utilized. 2. Will there be established times for the fields to be used? The baseball field will not be used beyond 9:00 PM during the summer (sunset yeaz round) and the volley ball pits beyond 10:00 PM. All times for.. use will be posted at the fields. The field and pits will not be used during service times. Very limited use of the field and pits will occur during the months of October to Mazch. 3. Will there be any sound buffering? It is not in our plan at this time; however, we would be vvilling to entertain any suggestions from City staff. 4. Will there be timers on the lights for the volley ball pits? Yes! They will be set to turn off no later than 10:00 PM. All times will be posted on the pits. 5. Will there be emergency access to the fields? Yes. We intend to install a gravel path for pedestrians which can also be used by emergency vehicles. It would be barricaded in such a way to prevent any unauthorized use by other vehicles. 6. Will there be restroom facilities available to those using the fields? In situations where those using the fields are part of a church function, the building restroom facilities w111 be open. In situations where those using the fields are not doing so as a church fimction (i.e. DeEvelyn Baseball Team), restroom facilities will not be available. This is consistent wRth the unavailabi]ity of restroom facilities when fields such as are available on Jefferson County Schoolproperty aze utilized by organized little league. Again there will be the presence of a church representative to assure that there is no trespassing on neighboring properties. If the field is usedby a church designated group for longer tha<i 3 hours, portable sanitary facilities will be provided, or the church restrooms will be open. 7. Concern for balls going onto adjacent neighboring properties. The orientation of the field should assure that this is kept to a minimum. The entire field will be fenced to keep balls from going beyond it's boundaries. S. Will the field be for public or private use? The baseball field will be for private use only. 9. The fence around the baseball field will be locked during times of non-use. 10. The volley ball pit lights will be no brighter than the existing and adjoining parking lot lights and will be controlled by a timer. 1 1. The church will look into hiring a private security company to patrol church property during times of high usage. 12. The field will be professionally maintained to ensure proper upkeep and pleasing visual appearance. 13. The church will explore the possibility of limiting access to parking lots after hours to discourage trespassing. 14. Regular maintenance patrols will be conducted to clean and maintain the field and surrounding areas. I hope this serves to adequately answer some of the comments and concerns raised at last Thursday's meeting. Again, I would like to point out that this plan is a considerable reduction from the plan that was submitted to the neighborhood last July. Please provide me with any other comments you may receive and I'll try to address them as best we can prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Once again, I request that you keep us scheduled for the May 1 Planning Commission meeting. Sincerely, David Lloyd Chairman Building, Plamiing, Maintenance and Transportation Committee Encl. cc: Trevor Bron, Lee Loyd APB °x'0,9 NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD)NPUT MEETIl`iG ~ 0 4 ~.>roJ Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. , . The location of this mceting is 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on April 10, 1997. The purpose for [his proposal is For construction of one baseball field and volleyball courU. The City of Wheal Ridge has adopted a requirement that, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (i) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of ]and, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the mceting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regazding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public (tearing. Although a s}mopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission end City Council where decisions arc rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: ' Is the proposal compafible with surrounding land uses and zoning? ' Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the projed7 ' What is the impact on our strcets7 ' Where will the storm drainage got ' How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the ndghborhood? ' What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me7 After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and the back of this form to list any specific eoncems, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Depattmrnt of Community Development. P.O. PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NOTICE OF NETGI~OI2HOOD INPUT h1EETING ___ Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE t6 allow private ~~n'i j ~y recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. ~ ' The location of this mceting is 11225 Wut 32nd Aveuue. , The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on April 10, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for wnstrttction of eme baseball field and volleyball courts. Tho City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement th_=.t, prior to applicelion for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (I),acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use oFland, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feel and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this mceting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly tothe applicant, the'v concems, issues and desires. A staff plannu will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations end the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis oFthe meeting will be entued as testimony, it is the public hearings in front oFPleruting Commission end City Council where decisions are rendued. Ifyou want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: ' Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? ' Are thud adcquete utilities and services in place or proposed to save the project? ' What is the impact on our strata? • Whue will the storm drainage go7 • How will the project be designed to enhance rathu than detract from the neighborhood? • What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to meT Aftu attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and the back of this form to Gst any specific wncems, issues or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Phase sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to [he City oFWheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.O. Box 638, Wheat Ridge, ~CO 80034. Nothing 1.as solved (~rairage, res'sow facilities, Ii~ts) fran the last meting - ilia only will do vrong and then get asaY with tecaise its aLreadv a dare deal. I have Lived in ary hme for 27 years and I ID uJf W.4Y1' A a+r t Frz7 n of anv kind in nn face. -cf-tsa a not fat ce cs~e d 'r rh ^ff'- 1'gb ~ a ~ d PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE Linda Hock 3494 r1 St. ~ 232-9495 .~^ ~ ~ y/~ ~///''N~~~ n n / i ~y ~ i ~ i -~ ~~ ~ n - ~ ~ Ili ! ~`I / ~~--v / `~. ,/i~~~ , .. J., / ~ ~ /fi< can-~~- T~.-c. lr~,~.c_- _ - NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING Applewood Baptise Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow private ,recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this mceting is 11225 Wat 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on April 30, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one baseball field and volleyball courU. The City of Wheat itidge ]tas adopted a teyuirement that, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting wilt be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: ' Is the proposal compatible with wrrounding land uses and zoning? ' Are Ihere adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? • What is the impact on our streets? • Where will tfie storm drainage go7 • How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? • What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? After attending the Neighborhood Input Meeting, please use the following space and the back of this form to list any specific concerns, iswes or suggestions which you may have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the applicant, as he is required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P;O?" ;Box`635,'Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE /~ ~o~aYeS_ `H rc .~er 3a~o ~ou%I ~T a~'~- ~~J~ `~c~! . a ~ 9 G ~ ,Pi d-e..i~. Q ~y-Ge~ /1~oa~c~ - .. NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETLYG Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this meeting is 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this meeting is 7:00 pm on April 10, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is for construction of one baseball field and volleyball courts. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that, prior to application for rezoning of property to a higher use, or for properties in excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use oF(and, an applicant must notify all residents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their wncems, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind Shat this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Conunission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents nomtally have include the following: • Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? What is the impact on our streets? ` Wherc will the storm drainage go7 ` How will the project be designed to enhance rasher than detract from the neighborhood? What specific changes cart be made in the proposal to mace ii more acceptable to me7 After attendin the Nei ~ boyhood [n ut Mee~iin ~~ ~-~ - ' "~ g 81i P & Ply use the foUowirig space'atid the back of i}iis form to list any specific concerns; issues'or suggestions which you inay have regarding this proposal. Please sign it and give it to the appUcant, as he is required io provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.O. Box 638, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. >f . _ , r ._ .. PRINT NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a CONDITIONAL USE to allow private recreational facilities on property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue. The location of this mceting is 11225 Wat 32nd Avenue. The time and date for this mating is 7:00 pm oa April 10, 1997. The purpose for this proposal is far rAnsWCtlan of oae baseball Feld and volleyball Courts. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that, prior to application for retuning of property to a higher use, or far properties N excess of one (1) acre, and for Conditional Use Permits which allow a conditional use of land, an applicant must notify all ruidents within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose for this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and also to allow the neighborhood to express directly to the applicant, their concerns, issues and desires. A sia$'planner will attend the mceting to discuss City policy and regulations end the process involved, howevu, the planner wiil remain impartial regarding viability of tbe project. Kcep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of codcerns residents normally have include the following: ' Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses end tuningT + Are these adequate utilities and services is plat::.: proposed 20 eerve the p:cjec!? • What is the impact on our sircets7 • Whue will the storm drainage goT • How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhoodT • What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it mare acceptable to me? Aftu attending the Ndghborhaad Input Meeting, please use the following space end the back of this form to list any specific wncems, issues or suggestions which you may have . regarding this proposal. Pleau sign it and give ii to the applicant, as he v required to provide these forms to the City along with his application. You may also mail your comments to the City of Wheat Ridge, Department of Community Development, P.O. Box 638, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034. Please refer to th_e aetachmen[s. - - - ---- PRINT NAME ADDRESS PHONE , Edward A. &~ ~ ~ 30961 West 30th Place ~ ~~~~~~~(303)~~252-3411 Phyllis K. Lakewood, CO 80215 Wa t~lington. Comments .f or the Neighborhood Meeting 4/10/97 Re: Ballfield nn Applewood Baptist Church Property. In any event there needs to 6e 200' strip of dense vegetation between the Gulch and the Church Property uses for 2 reasons: 1 This is now a habitat area. with heavy ground cover. All ground cover will 6e gone when the gulch improvements have Veen made. Both cover and a buffer are needed for the protection ^f wildlife. 2 Uegetation is needed to offset the nenJ- ative ecological effects ^f large expanses of existing paved parking-lots. Alec questions that Head t^ be asked/answered; Will there be lights and ,w ill there tie a P.A: systemT A tiallfield in itself is acceptable Iiut lights and a P.A, system are totally unacceptable in a residential area. Is ball field use to be permanent or is it to Eie temporary to 6e done away with for a new church and more parkingT We were among the 110 families evacuated in the 1973 Leoa Gulch flood. We saw the potential. The Applewood Xnolls hillside drains undat'32nd Ave and between the Church Property and Quail Street. This was before any building or paving ^n tha Church property north of 32nd Ave. and before the fill for the homes west of Quail Street. The result even with no water generated norf-h of 32nd Ave was a north-south river that no Sne could crass. Every sq,fcot ^f paving generates additional runoff. 1n my ^pinion, a ball field or any use that permanently precludes additional paving on the property is preferable to a use or uses that require more paving and resu'!t in additional rapid run-off. ~~ q - -d~'w~-' /~3~ ~ w ~~LZ,~ ~~ ~f~.a. -s / 35' 10961 West .30th Place Lakewood, Colorado 80215 April 11, 1997 Ms. Meredith Reckert Planner- City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Dear Ms. Reckert: Nothing was said at the the meeting held April 10, 1997 to change our feelings and concerns as expressed in our letter of June 24, 1996 to the City of Wheat Ridge, a copy attached hereto for your information. The spokesman for the church did not address any of the items in my letter and these items were discussed at the meeting held in June, 1996. The church had the same spokesman at that meeting. There are no good reasons for the church's proposal, considering all the facts. Sincerely, ~~~~~~~ ward A. Watlzngto ! ~ Phy~is K. Watlington June 24, 1990 2 sm writing this on my north patio on a quiet summer afternoon. The meeting at the church did nothing to change our views concerning the plans for haseball fields, soccer fields and tennis courts. In fact xhe discussion convinced us even more that the develonmer.t should NAT take place. There are just too many problems: 1. NOISE 2. Sanitation 3. Traffic congestion 4. Disturbing the "quality of life" of residents living adjacent to and nearby the property. 5. Disturbing the "quality of WILD Life". 6. The definite possibility o£ Late- night unapproved and unwarranted use. 7. Parking problems. 8. Proposed .fences obstructing neighbors' views.. i i There are parks and schools grounds (i.e. Everitt Middle School in Wheat Ridge) for such uses. According to the Applewood Baptist Church this property was very expensive ( however, no taxes are paid). A church member stated the church plans to lease the fields if-the proposed plan is approved. We believe the chnrch should wait until it can afford to build the "sanctuary" as shown oa its plan. The proposed playing fields do NOT belong to the midst of this residential area. We feel this is not a matter for compromise. ~pectfull ' ~ lJ ,P,eJ , ~~ ~ ~'w yl is K. Watlington ward A. Watlington ~~~~'~~~M~~i~ ~,P~ ~ 157 ___. ____ DUANE P. CHESLEY E-Mail: DPCHESLEY~c aol.com .. 3261 Routt Street _ Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-5459 - -- Telephone (303)238-5982 Cit}• of Wheat Ridge April 14, 1997 Dept. of Conmrunity Development P.O. Box 638 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 Re: Applewood Baptist Church Neighborhood Input Meeting, 4-10-97. The Conditional Use request by the Applewood Baptist Church should not be approved by the Planning Commission and/or the City Council for the following reasons: 1. The addition of sports fields on this property would not be compatible with the R-1 zoning which surrounds this property. 2. Added sports facilities on this property will cause additional traffic and noise in the surrounding residential areas. 3. By the Church's own admission these sporting fields would be available to non-Church groups thereby causing a variety of related control issues such as sanitation, trespassing, parking and further noise. 4. Once built these fields would be subject to "normal improvements" to include expansion and lighting to meet expected demand. It is quite evident that this growing Church with there planned development is not compatible with the R-lsetting in which they are located. In order to preserve the surrounding residential area further expansion of facilities at the Church c<'utnot be allowed. In addition the sharing of these proposed sports facilities with the Jefferson County School District cannot be allowed. Sincerely, ~~~~~ Duane P. hesley The Cify of GWh e at ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION Rid e Department of Planning and Development g 7500 West 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge; CO 80033 Applicant Applewood Baptist Church Address 11220 W. 32nd Avenue- Phone 232-9575 ... Owner. " -- Address Phone " Location of request' 11225 W. 32nd Avenue Type bf action re uested below q (check one or more of the actions listed which pertain to your request.) ^ Change of zone or zone conditions 8 Variance/Waiver Site development plan approval Nonconforming use change Special use permit ^ Flood plain special-exception Conditional use permit Interpretation of code Temporary use/building permit Zone line modification Minor subdivision Public Improvement Exception Subdivision Street vacation Preliminary Miscellaneous plat 8 Final Solid waste landfill/ ^ ** See attached procedural guide mineral extraction for specific requirements. ^ Other Permit Detailed Description of request Construction of one , 1 basefield field and volleyball courts. _ {• 1- . _. _~_ List all persons and companies who hold an interest in the described real property, as owner, mortgagee, lessee, optionee, etc. NAME ADDRESS PHONE I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and_ correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawful-]y be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this actin on his behalf. Signature of Applicant ~~~~~ Subscribed and sworn to me this ~ day of ~ 7~,_ '~ 19 ~_ - ~/ _ ...~liyi~O s r '~+ ~ ivvtary PitoliC ~- - ~- SEAL hAy Commission Expiros Ono^^^~tt My commission expires Date Received ~ - t ~_ ~~ Receipt No. (~ ~QZ r R2-~- Case' No, L/tKEWOOD GUS'-~~-3 DEPA4ThE?ti OF PWIMNG MD DEVELGPFBdT -735-2852 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING• May 1,1997 DATE PREPARED: April 22, 1997 CASE NO. & NAME: CUP~7-3/Applewood Baptist CASE MANAGER: "Meredith Reckert ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit LOCATION OF REQUEST: 11225 W. 32nd Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32nd Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32nd Avenue APPROXIMATE AREA: n!a PRESENT ZONING: Residential-One PRESENT LAND USE: Church parking, education, vacant SURROUNDING ZONING: S: City of Lakewood; N, E, W: R-1 SURROUNDING LAND USE: N: Lena Gulch; S: Church; E, W: low density residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: Low density residential/Parks & Open Space DATE PUBLISHED: April 11, 1997 DATE POSTED: April 17, 1997 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: April 17, 1997 ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN () (X) ZONING ORDINANCE 0 () SUBDNISION REGULATIONS lX) () OTHER CASE FILE & PACItET MATERIALS SLIDES EXHIBITS JURISDICTION: The properly is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. Planning Division Staff-Report Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church I. REQUEST Page 2 Pursuant to Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Section 26-6 (A) Conditional Uses aze "Permitted Uses" which are subject to review to ensure the use is properly designed so as to mitigate potential negative impacts to the neighborhood. In accordance with these provisions, the applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a baseball field and volleyball pits as ancillary uses to a church. It is the intent of the church to use the recreation amenities as part of their ministry, however, DeEvelyn High School (located on 32nd Avenue west of the Wheat Ridge city limits) would be using the baseball field for practice and home games. Attached is a site plan provided by the applicant. Staff has suggested some improvements to the site plan pursuant to Exhibit `A'. Included also is supplemental information provided by the Church regarding some of the issues and questions raised at the neighborhood meeting under Exhibit `B'. The existing church building is located on the south side of West 32nd Avenue within the City of Lakewood, across from the subject property. A church education building and parking area, (built in the mid-80's) aze located on the north side of West 32nd Avenue. Another parking lotto the west was approved as a conditional use and built in 1996. II. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A meeting for neighborhood input was held on April 10, 1997. Those attending included the following: Meredith Reckert -City staff Gary Wardle -City staff David Lloyd -applicant Trevor Bron -applicant Lee Loyd -applicant Bryan Weimer -applicant Sherry and Ross Izak - 3204 Quail Street JoAnn James - 3223 Pierson Street Artie Gibbazd - 3415 Quail Street David R. Cole - 3050 Quail Street Susan Paddock - 11027 West 31st Avenue Duane Chesley - 3261 Routt Street Tom Bert 3281 Routt Street Robin Christians - 3159 Robb Circle George E. Hank - 3294 Quail Street Wil Sugai - 11158 West 33rd Avenue Dolores Archer - 3260 Routt Street Debbie and Ralph Perri - 1090 Holland Street Planning Division Staff Report Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church Jeanette Patrick - 11435 West 32nd Avenue Pat Bray - 3065 Quail Street Ivlary Louise and Sylvester Rohr - 3298 Quail Street Phyllis and Ed Watlington - 10961 West 30th Place Dave DiGiacomo - 3275 Quail Street ????? Hartline - 11151 West 32nd Avenue The following concerns were expressed: Page 3 -Why the previous plan showing soccer fields was not pursued? Why is this amended request being proposed when the church knows the neighbors object? -Who would use the field -public or private entities? -Whether any of the Planning Commission are members of the church? -Whether the field would be lit, now or in the future -Would there be vehicular access? -Would restroom facilities be available? There was concern expressed because some of the children after Sunday school were seen urinating outside -What would be the days and hours of use? -Can zoning conditions placed on a conditional use approval be enforced? -Is any noise barrier being proposed? -What is-the status of the church's long term master plan? If this is approved, would it be a "foot in the door" for future approvals? -Although the new parking lot has been built, parking is still a problem for those residences on Robb Circle behind the main church building. Fireplugs and driveways aze still being blocked by those attending services. -The detention area on the east side of the education is not being maintained -Are there any assurances of the church being a good neighbor if the field goes in? -What are the fending sources? -What is the liability of the church for foul balls breaking windows? -The possibility for the church to hire someone or use volunteers to have the grounds patrolled during high-use periods? -Will the ball field be raised? Where will it drain? -The neighbors feel that the church misrepresented their intent to raise (place fill dirt) the new pazking lot -The fact that there is already too much traffic on West 32nd Avenue -The issue of security and vandalism on adjacent properties -Will the new detention pond be fenced? It could be an attractive nuisance to children in the area? -If De'Evelyn High School uses the field, will they be charged? How often will they practice? How many games will there be? -How many homes could be built on the property? What is the process for approval? -Will the volleyball pits be lighted? How often will they be used? Will they be used by formal leagues? -Could the existing parking lot lights be put on a motion detector? l.~I Planning Division Staff Report Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church CJ Page 4 -The fact that the church has not attempted to respond to the same issues raised the last time and perhaps they should come back with a more specific proposal. Included under Exhibit `C' are written responses received in regazd to the proposal. III. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria to evaluate a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed conditional use will allow the expansion of an existing use. Because property which is currently vacant will now have a baseball field and volley ball pits, it would be wrong to say there will be no affect on the neighborhood. There will be affects on the amount and type of traffic on 32nd Avenue which will have a negative affect on the convenience of persons living in the azea. There will be minor visual impacts and 'noise impacts to area residents, as well. 2. Will not adversely affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution. Construction of the new recreation facility will not affect the amount of light and air to adjacent properties as there will be only surface improvements and no building mass. There will be an increase irn the amount of vehicles traveling to and from the site which will increase the amount of noise and air pollution in the area. To mitigate some of the noise, staff has recommended that a 6' high solid fence be extended north along the western property line past the northern edge of the ballfaeld improvements. 3. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates desirable land use for the property as Low Density Residential development and Parks and Open Space. A church and associated accessory uses are considered compatible and complementary to low density residential development. The City has not pursued acquisition of land for parks and open space on this property. Since the underlying Residential-One zoning will not change, consistency with the Comprehensive Plan will be maintained. The use of the area as a recreation facility could be considered consistent with Pazks and Open Space designation. 4. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off the site. There will obviously be an impact on traffic on West 32nd Avenue by creation of the fields, but, no more of an impact than low density residential usage would. Parking on the existing, paved and striped Planning Division Staff Report Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church Page 5 lots could not be considered hazardous or unsafe. Emergency vehicle access with abreak-away chain must be provided as shown on Staff s site plan. 5. Will be appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compafible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. Height and bulls are not an issue. Some attempt at buffering for adjacent properties must occur on at least the west sides as the bulk of the activity will occur in that area. Staff would recommend that at least aten-foot wide strip of landscaped with a 6' high solid fence be extended north past the detention pond to the northern edge of the baseball field improvements 6. Will not overburden the capacities off the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. Approval of the conditional use will not negatively affect utilities. All responding agencies can provide service to the property. There will be an impact to the amount and type of traffic on 32nd Avenue particulazly when games and practices are over. There will be no affect on schools because no new dwelling units would result as approval of the conditional use. There would be a positive impact on a local high school which currently has no baseball fields. There will be no impact on parks as the church is providing it's own recreation facility. IV. AGENCY REFERRALS Consolidated Mutual Water District can serve subject to the company's rules and regulations. City of Lakewood has no comments or concerns. Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District will require emergency access to the baseball field. Public Works will require a drainage study and a fill permit, if required. They are requesting the curb cut to the western parking azea be closed to eliminate conflicting turning movements for cars exiting the site. V. STAFF CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that approval of a conditional use permit is required to allow the construction of a baseball field and volley pits as ancillary uses to a church. Staff further concludes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and that impacts to adjacent residences will be minimized if appropriate controls and site improvements are required. For these reasons, a recommendation of Approval is given with the following conditions: Planning Division Staff Report Page 6 Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church 1. The field and volleyball pits be limited to use by the church and De'Evelyn, 2. At the least, a 6' high solid fence with a 10' strip of landscaping be built from the rear of the western parking lot north to the end of the baseball field improvements. 3. That emergency access be provided from the north side of the western parking lot to the baseball field. This emergency access shall be 20' wide, hazel surfaced with turnaround and gated to allow emergency and maintenance vehicles only. 4. A path be provided from the baseball field to the education building for access to restrooms. 5. That the curb cut to the western pazking lot be closed to eliminate conflicting turning movements onto West 32nd Avenue. 6. No PA system, concessions or bleachers be allowed. 7. No lights be allowed on the baseball field and lights for the volleyball pits remain. off when not in use and be turned off by 10 p.m. when in use. Such lights shall conform to requirements of Zoning Code Section 26-30(S) regazding mitigation of off-premises impacts of outdoor lighting. 8. The applicant abide by the information provided in Exhibit `B' regarding use, hours, and maintenance. VI. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. CUP-97-3, a request by Applewood Baptist Church for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction_of abaseball field and three volleyball pits for property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: i. A conditional use permit is required to allow the construction of these amenities. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. There will be minimal impacts to the neighborhood if proper buffering and controls are used. 4. Staff reconunends approval. With the following conditions as recommended by Staff: 1. The field and volleyball pits be limited to use by the church and De'Evelyn, 2. At the least, a 6' high solid fence with a 10' strip of landscaping be built from the rear of the western parking lot north to the end of the baseball field improvements. 3. That emergency access be provided from the north side of the western parking lot to the baseball field. This emergency access shall be 20' wide, hard surfaced and gated to allow emergency and maintenance vehicles only. 4. A path be provided from the baseball field to the education building fox access to restrooms. 5. That the curb cut to the western parking lot be closed to eliminate conflicting turning movements onto West 32nd Avenue. Planning Division Staff Report Page 7 Case No. Cup-97-3/Applewood Baptist Church 6. No PA system, concessions or bleachers be allowed. 7. No lights be allowed on the baseball field and lights for the volleyball pits remain off when not in use and be fumed off by 10 p.m. when in use. Such lights shall conform to requirements of Zoning Code Section 26-30(S) regarding mitigation of off-premises impacts of outdoor lighting.. 8. The applicant abide by the information provided in Exhibit `B' regarding use, hours, and maintenance. Option B: "I move that Case No. CUP-97-3, a request by Applewood Baptist Church for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a baseball field and three volleyball pits for property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. :' s • rnecityot ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION ~]Vheat Rid a Department of Planning and Development g 7500 West 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 237-6944 Applicant Applewood Baptist Church Address 11220 W. 32nd Avenue Phone 232-9575 Owner Address Phone " Location of request 11225 W. 32nd Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.) Change of zone or zone conditions Site development plan approval Special use permit Conditional use permit Temporary use/building permit Minor subdivision Subdivision __. 8 Preliminary Final ** See attached procedural guide for specific requirements. Variance/Waiver Nonconforming use change Flood plain special exception Interpretation of code Zone line modification Public Improvement Exception Street vacation Miscellaneous plat Solid waste landfill/ mineral extraction permit ^ Other Detailed Description of request Construction of one (1} 6asefield 'field and voile ball courts. List all persons and companies who hold an interest in the described real property, as owner, mortgagee, lessee, optionee, etc. NAME ADDRESS PHONE I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct-to the best of mg knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Applicant Subscribed and sworn to me this ~ day of ~ 19 g~_ SEAL Received '~ Receipt No. Case No. tidy Commission Expires On n^'2^mt My commission expires -_--_-~_ ~-- - 7 -- ~ -` - ~ „ - „~ _ __ _.--- i!i_____.__..____---__....-- --- . . -- - --- ._ _ ~ . ~ ~/ G~i `~`1 ~' 7~ _~f u i~' c / - - _ _.__ _ ~~ - --{-~-f~-1 P~i~/rJ~2~Y _.._ ~_. .~-?- - ._- __ _--_ --rl - --- - ._ _ __ ._ _ f ~S.t.t_2 ~ __.-___.__.___.__ .___ .. __ _.~_ --------------____ _-_--- F _ § 26-6 FTE-D3AT RIDGE CPI'Y CODE Sec. 26.6. Legislative and administrative pro- cess aad procedures. This section sets forth the procedural and sub- stantive requirements which apply to the various administrative and legislative processes estab- lished by this rnde, and as may be required by other city ordinances and/or state law, where ap- plicable. ~- (A) Conditzorzal Uses: Conditicnal uses are per mined uses whic~n aze subject to review to ensure that they aze properly designed, developed, oper- ated and maintained so as to be appropriate for specific locations within a zone district wherein the conditional use is specifically enumerated. The primary issues which the planning commission shall address are those special design consider- ations which mitigate potential detrimental im- pacts of a conditional use on :surrounding land uses, the street systems, or public services or fa- cilities. In order to achieve compatibility, the plan- ning commission, and city cduucil upon appeal, shall have the right to approve, approve with mod- ifications, or deny a conditional use request. (1) Applicability. The requirements of this sub- section_ha11 apply to all uses listed as "Con- ditional Uses" within any particular zone district. (2) Applicatiorz /'orm and review procedures: (a) Prior to submitting any application for a conditional use permit, the applicant shall be required to hold a neighbor- hood input meeting (see subsection (F)(1) for requirementsl. (b) Conditional use applications may be originated only by the fee owners of the property or by his attorney or le- gally designated agent by power-of- attorney. (c) Application shall be submitted on forms provided by the department of plan- ningand development, and shall be ac- companied by a copy of the property deed, a certified boundary or improve- ment survey, and a fee of one hundred dollars (5100.001. (d) All applications shall also be accompa- nied by a site development plan and additional written information in suf- ficient detail to convey the full intent of the applicant in developing, oper- ating and maintaining the conditional use. The site plan shall meet the re- quirements of aTYPE ISITE PLAN as set forth in subsection (E)(1}. (e) Upon receipt of a complete application packet, as described above, the plan- ning and development department shall proceed as Follows: 1. Refer the application to affected public agencies for review and com- ment. 2. Within thirty (30) days of accep- tance of a completed application packet, give notice of a scheduled public heazing on the application by newspaper publication, letter notification and posting in the manner as provided in subsection (F)(1). 3. Prepaze a written report and rec- ommendations to the planning commission, which evaluates the proposal and makes findings using the review criteria established in the following subsection (A)(3). (3) Criteria for review. Before a conditional use is approved, the applicant shall show, and the planning rnmmission shall find, the pro- posed conditional use: (a) Will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfaze, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the pro- posed use. fb) Will not adversely affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution. (c) _ Is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (d) Will not result in undue traffic conges- tion or traffic hazards, or unsafe pazking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of per- sons whether on or off the site. (e) Will be appropriately designed, in- - eluding setbacks, heights, parking, ~~ ~y E~ ,~ v~ ~p ~~ ~~~~~ Sup~~ No 1-~ 1690 i ~ ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT bulk, buffering, screening and 1and- s~Ping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with character of the sur- rounding areas and neighborhood, es• pecially with adjacent properties. (~ Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. (4>,, Plcnningcommissionreview.Planningcom- mission shall heaz and consider any evi• dente or statement presented by the appIi- cant, city staff, or by any person in attendance at the hearing. The planning commission shall then decide to anprove, approve with conditions, or deny the appli• cation, basing its decision upon the facts presented in•the public hearing in consid• eration of the criteria for review as speci- (ied in subsection (3) above. Planning com• mission may impose conditions or stipulations, which may include physical de- sign as well as operational and mainte- nance considerations, upon the conditional use in addition to staddazd development and use regulations which apply within a paz- ticulaz zone district or for a similar "per- mitted use." Such conditions or stipula- tions may be imposed in order to ensure compliance with the criteria for review, which, if not complied with, shall be grounds for revocation of the conditional use. (s) Appeal. An applicant, or any aggrieved property owner within six hundred (600) feet of the subject property, may appeal the decision of the planning rnmmission to city council by filing such appeal, along with an explanation for the appeal, with the Wheat Ridge City Clerk within ten (10) working days after the date of the planning commis- sion hearing. Upon such appeal, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the city council, Following the same public notice requirements and procedures set forth For the planning cbmmission hearing. City council, in addition to consideration of the planning commission record, shall bear ad- ditional evidence and testimony presented, § 26-6 and shall decide to sustain, amend or reject the planning commission decision, with its decision being based upon all evidence pre• sented and the planning commission record, with due consideration of the criteria for review. (6) Enforcement. All conditions and stipula- tions imposed by the planning commission or city council shall be maintained in per• petuity with the special use. If at any time the stipulations or conditions are not ad- hered to or aze Cound to have been materi- ally altered in scope, application or design, the zoning administrator shall notify a code enforcement officer of the nature of the vi• olation(s) and the code enforcement officer shall initiate standard enforcement proceed- ings. SupP v„ to 1691 .. ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT § 28-fi - bulk,- buffering, screening and land- and shall decide to sustain, amend or reject soaping, so as to be in harmony and the planning commission decision, with its compatible with character of the sur• decision being based upon all evidence pre• rounding areas and neighborhood, es- sented and the planning commission record, ' pecially with adjacent properties. with due c_ onsideration of the criteria for (0 Will not overburden the capacities of review. the existing streets, utilities, pazks, (6) Enforcement. All conditions and stipuIa- schools and other public facilities and lions imposed by the planning commission services. or city council shall be maintained in per- (4>., Planning commission review. Planningrnm- petuity with the special use. If at any time mission shall hear and consider any evi• the stipulations or conditions are not ad• Bence or statement presented by the appli• hered to or are found to have been materi• cant, city staff, or by any person in al[y altered in scope, application or design, attendance at the hearing. The planning the zoning administrator shallnotifyacode commission shall then decide to approve, enforcement officer of the nature of the vi- approve with conditions, or deny the appli- o[ation(s) and the code enforcement officer cation, basing its decision upon the facts shall initiate standard enforcement proceed- presented in.the public hearing in consid- ings. eration of the criteria for review as speci• fled in subsection (3) above. Planning com• mission may impose conditions or stipulations, which may include physical de sign as well as operational and mainte- nance considerations, upon the conditional use in addition to standazd development and ' use regulations which apply within apar- ticulaz zone district or for a similar "per- mitted use." Such conditions or stipula- tions may be imposed in order to ensure compliance with the criteria for review, which, if not complied with, shall be grounds for revocation of the conditional use. (5) Appeal. An applicant, or any aggrieved property owner within six hundred (600) feet of the subject property, may appeal the decision oCthe planning commission to city council by filing such appeal, along with an explanation Cor the appeal, with the Wheat Ridge City Clerk within ten (IO) working days after the date of the planning commis- sion heazing. Upon such appeal, a public heazing shall be scheduled before the city council, following the same public notice requirements and procedures set forth for the planning commission heazing. City council, in addition to consideration of the planning commission record, shall hear ad- ditional evidence and testimony presented, supp No 11 1691 _ _ W. 32 =° AY~w~ I i 41 ~. ! I ! ; ' I ! ,'~v. v i II I I "~,1\ \ ! i~ ,.\ \\ ~ \\~ II I I ` \\ II I 1I \\ \\ ~I Ei.~ I it ~ \\ \\\ ~ I! A I I ~. r_ ~\\ \ I~ I ',\ \a ~ ~ II I .r r \\ \ II \ _~ I' h \\ ~ \ 1 !~ \ ~ \\\ ~ ~ ,. _ Ig t I . i' Yo4~EY TF __~~_~_ ~ e... ~ ------ .. .. =, v ~.,' ` I 1 7 BLLL {{~~ o VGGLfr ~~ .,Ln i. . ~ ° nr II` ~ I 0 ~ I ~ ', I vo~lsr '! o m ~' i I I rlr iN '~ y i j I ~ b w ; t N I ~. ~ .; ' 1'S ' i:~~i • ,. ~;. :. r •'. ~ `~ , I ~ ! z ! .. ~ ~ ;: ',- , ~. ~M r-, Q ~ I 3 ~ ~^ I C O ~ ~ ~ Via` ~5~~ R G A s 1 N ~~, a t " ~yy C qq~ry~3 HNO dq~ fo 1 1 1 I ^ ' R I I U +1 0 :~ N ~y i v V N ~ p i m i i r ~ E' Zm ~ I n ~ ~ i ~ .n _ ~ I 1\~ . .. m ?N~ 0 N i r ~ _ ~ O ~ i; ~ m~j ro e ~ ~ 11 N Ib CzN a ~ -1 o a IN ~ , <'i i @ ~ o ~I .. r D m ~ 0 L ~ C - o 0 ~ ~ ;., :'. .. ;: ,i i a m R 1 a ~~ u D ~~ y~ ~` y {Y~ ~ "1 ~ c_ a ~ t+ n I ': a ;, I ,. ~~cR~ y~"',~,~~'-~."~~.» ~~:.y~w;~w. i..~ ~ ~ ~e.- ~ r 3 H t '`+" ~ a~~~. ~~' . Yf#"~, ? ~ -,ss. ,~ .~ ~<`~'~;x ~ ,~"~r,~,,~~';~}I~' .-~~,.Y`~~.. ~,3 't+' . ~ ~ ~ ~'C ~ `T~ ' ~~r :i - .i~ r ~ ,i' ~+ rY N ~ i ~ t , ' . . ~.°~~ ~ , 'n..9 „ 2._ , •• ' ' ' ' R . ` . . • • . . .f •-'Yi. ' a. ' . ^ ~ ~ . . .. _ W. .3Z N~ AJElJUE - . . _ " _ " _ , _ _ ' _s _ ' ~ ' _ ' _ _ ' _ _ _ _ _ _' _ ' _ _ _ ' ' ~ ~ ~ r ',' ~ _ _ " ' ~ _ _ .~ ~ .~ ~. ~ ~ `l _ ~ ~ ~ ` r _' _ _ ' '.~ _ _ .~ ~ _ ~ ~. , i 1 ~ ~/.$' 4 f _ ; i ._ - -i~-- , ~1 ~--------- ----, . , i ' ' ---• i ~1 I .'1 ' ~ i II I i I I i ~' ""_' ~ ~ " tl + %r "-' -~ ~-~ \ ~ '! ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~, ,\\ \ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~~ .'~~ ~~~ i\ ~ ° ~~ ~ ~ , ~ - ~. . i `I ` \ \\ :R ` ~~ ~ \\~ ; ~ \ ° ` )~ A 3 ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ w ~ i;\ ~\ ~.~` ~i ~~ ~o ~ z~~,.., 1 Ip ~ \. jl~ I~ b ~ I`,~ n ~~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~,~u ~~0 f ~ a \~ , ~~ ; ~ S i C ~ ~~ `\ T[ ~~ \~~1 1f \ I IZ T ) J ~~ . \a ' ~ ~~ < , " } ~ ` \` _ _ _ 11 ~ . . . ~R ~\ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\ ~ I ~~ I \~ \~.. _ ~. ~ ~ ~` ~ ~~' ~ ,~ ~ ~. I \ / ~ i :y ' y ' . ' . I ~ '~~ Y ~ ------ - ~ ~ ., . -~` ~I s~~ I : ~ A t 7T . ~ f ' a G~ ~ ~ ~' ~ . i ,L F ' i ~ o VOKFt ~ .. , . x ~ ~ c ~ ' ' I ~ " ~ B~LI I ~ . . ~ ' A I ~ i ^ ~~Y ' \ i ~ . I ° \ ~ voi~r . ~ a ~ ~- ' ~( - ' ~ ~ a,u. m j, ; i ~ I ~ ~~ P~Y I •N S{'~' ~ + ~ ~ r..° . {" L~} i ~ ~ _ . ' . i o ~ • _ _ _ ' _ ...,.~ ~ y ' ~ ~ ~ , I f ~ r t ' • E ~. r t ~ . ! - ~ . .i ~ 0 ' ~ N _ , Y/G7' - - N' QI I\ ., \ \ . 3ee' lyi 0 M +~a ?1N0 5~~ ~d ~ : .~ , i ' b ov e ~ i ,~ Ea~ Zm I ~ ~E ~ ~ m I I ~`° m aoQ ." c ~ j~~ ~ ti `a 4 ixEN ] , ~ j ~ ~v,~ - ~ n ro ib ~ ~ c z ~-{ { ~ ^ C -ifI ~1, a N ~ ~ `~ ~ - ro ~ o'z;~ - ,~' r > ~ m t ~ 0_ L ~ O ~ ~ M ~ N ~` ' n S S Y ~~n +.f ~ ~ ~. , ~ ~' -.%~ ' / `c- r 9 l° i ' ; a i~ ~ I 1 i I { ~ N ~' 4 ' N ~ Q S i i t ~ ?i P D ) ~' > ~P~ n k„~,~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ , ~~ y~•~~~~ ~-~ ~~ '.. :i .. . , , •{,~„~ ~ 'f"• • ' f: ~ 7 ` .~ . . •~ ,,. T _ . .., ~F: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y T,i-.. • ~ y • ~ r . ; o`~` ~~~~~. ~ , Y . ~ ~` y•~}. ~::~~ 4.. ,r~r~ ~ ~ , ?'Y _ .i .2 , ~i',,~j_ ~ ~.1 . ' , ~ . . . ~, , y~. • i ~ 4~ ~ m i "! 's .~ , ~ ~ IV ~ ~ ~ ti r o_ I ~~ b ~ i ~ V~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~'~ PUBLIC FORUM ROSTER THIS dS THE TIME FOR ANYONE TO SPEAK ON ANY SUBJECT NOT APPEARING UNDER ITEM 6.OF THE PUBLIC HEARING SECTION OF THE AGENDA FOR MAY I. 1997. Please print name, address and phone number. Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 Page 6 1. It would make it possible to build two new classrooms, 2. The adjacent neighbor has indicated that he does not object to the variance. t~ Commissioner CERVENY added the following condition: Request a Power of Attorney from the legal owner of the property to the east stating that he does not object to this request. Motion carried 5-0. fmdTkomal use Permit Commissioner Snow motioned, Commissioner BRIN131AN seconded, that Case No. CUP-97-3, a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the expansion of a church and private school for property located at 3900 Pierce Street, be approved for the following reasons: 1. It will allow for the expansion of an existing use, 2. The evaluation criteria support approval of the request, 3. Staff recommends approval of the request. With the following conditions: 1. Monday through Friday no parking be allowed on the east side of Pierce Street from north of the church past the discernment house, 2. This area will be reserved for pull-up lane only, 3. Saturday and Sunday no parking be allowed in front of the discernment house a distance from the north property line to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, 4. The architect continue working with the City arbonst regarding saving the existing trees. Motion carried 5-0. D. Case No. CUP-97-3: An application by the Applewood Baptist Church for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a church (baseball field and volleyball courts) in a Residential-One zone district. Property is located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Ms. Reckert advised the Commission that additional correspondence had been received regarding this case. There was a letter of support from members of the church who live in Wheat Ridge and two other letters from citizens who oppose the proposal. Ms. Reckert passed out copies of an aerial photo designating the areas in consideration. Ms. Reckert presented information 40 Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 Page 7 regarding this case and submitted into the record the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and exhibits. Ms. Reckert provided slides showing various angles to the property for the Commission's review. Ms. Reckert stated that the property is zoned Residential-One. A church and all ancillary uses that typically go along with a church are considered conditional uses in all residential zoned districts within the City. Conditional Uses are permitted uses, however, there is the proviso with that designation that there be a site plan review which involves the neighborhood, a neighborhood input meeting is required and a public hearing before approval. This church has a portion of its property on the south side of 32nd Avenue within the City of Lakewood and is primarily the main church building. To the north in the City of Wheat Ridge is about 14 acres that is owned by the church. There has been a new parking area installed as well. The intent of the church is to use the recreation amenities as part of their ministry, however, DeEvelyn High School (located on 32nd Avenue west of the Wheat Ridge city limits) would be using the baseball field for practice and home games. A neighborhood meeting was held and many conceraS were expressed at that time. Discussion occurred regarding what path materials were being proposed, adjacent house locations and future building prospects, possibility of moving the baseball fields to the east, drainage plan requirements, special eventloutside uses, bleachers, use of the fields by outside entities, and location of volleyball courts. Chairperson WILLIAMS swore in the following: David Lloyd, 1425 S. Welch Circle, Lakewood, 80228. Mr. Lloyd is the Chair of the Church Building and Planning Committee. He stated with him was Treavor Braun who is the Associate Pastor. He stated that he felt that Staff had performed a very good job but felt there were a few things in the staff report that he felt needed clarification. The new ball field will replace an existing softball field although it is informal in nature. The current plan is a scaled down plan from the one originally presented to the neighborhood last year. That plan had soccer fields and a tennis court. He expressed concern over some of the Staff recommendations. Item 2 relates to the six foot high solid fence be specifically built along the western property line. He questioned this fence having the ability to be a buffer to noise. Item 3 relates to emergency access which recommends a hard surface and gate be installed and maintained. He stated that they would like to construct this out of gravel or crusher fines to eliminate the amount of impervious area that would be constructed on the site. Item 5 relates to curb cut closure. He stated that parking attendants are available to assure smooth traffic flow and that this particular cut is used especially on Sunday mornings. Item 6 states no PA system, bleachers, or concession be allowed. He asked that bleachers be reconsidered for spectators. Questions were raised regarding how high they would want bleachers, sanitation facilities, and leaving the curb out with specific inlout lanes, however, Staff feels one of the cuts needs to be closed. Commissioner SNOW requested that the response letter from the church dated April 14, Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 Page 8 1997, be read aloud for the audience. Chairperson WILLIAMS stated that since so many citizens were registered to speak, that if they agree with what has already been stated, that they simply state that they agree to save time. Mike Larkin, 3187 Robb, Lakewood. Mr. Larkin stated that he is against the project. He feels the church has not been a good neighbor. There has been excessive parking on the street while the new parking lot remains half full. Other concerns included poor response from the church when approached about problems, traffic, noise, restroom facilities, and he also feels there is a lack of planning. He suggested keeping it open space. Mr. Anthony Marcello, 3241 Routt Street. Mr. Marcello is opposed to the project for all the reasons previously stated. The noise issue is his main concern and stated that on nights that the church have functions including loud music, his children are kept awake. He also does not see a connection with the church and school which he believes should be kept separate. Other concerns included increased traffic, parking on the street, noise, and sanitation facilities. Ms. Virginia Sellers, 3310 Routt Street. Stated she and her husband are opposed to the project and have actually built a fence to protect their property from the public and those riding horses. Ms. LeeAnn Mullen, 3275 Quail Street. Stated she is opposed to the project for all the reasons stated and further testified that she does not feel the church has been a good neighbor. She regularly picks up trash that is left behind, her trees have been cut and cuttings left behind by the church, and the raising of the parking lot caused drainage onto her property, in addition the a three story education building in a residential area. She felt consideration should be given to the pollution from excessive traffic. She requested a "no play/quiet"time in the neighborhood on the weekend after a long week at work for everyone. Mr. Ross Issak, 3204 Quail Street. Mr. Issak is opposed to the project and any further expansion of the church. His main concern is noise because he works from 60 to 80 hours a week and feels the extra noise will interfere with his quiet time. He stated he bought his home because it was in a quiet area with little traffic and over time it has become extremely noisy into the night. Also, people drive over his lawn, there is a considerable increase in traffic/pollution, quality of life in the neighborhood has been affected, and in addition, wildlife issues and property values should be considered. Mr. Ross Casados, 3291 Routt Street. Mr. Casados is against the proposal and feels that everything expressed previously applies to him as well. He is also concerned that ATV activity will increase in the field with the addition of ball fields. 9 1& Richard Solankee, 11038 W. 38th Avenue. Mr. Solankee is opposed for all reasons stated. Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 Page 9 Ms. Janice Hurst, 10499 W. 38th Avenue. Ms. Hurst is for the proposal because she feels this proposal is good for the youth and is being built at no taxpayer expense. She believes that the problems could be controlled and dealt with. Mr. Wall Previs, 3060 Quail, Lakewood. Mr. Previs is opposed for reasons stated however, is primarily opposed because of the street parking. He complimented Staff on their work regarding this case, however, referenced a portion of Ms. Reckert's statement that a church fits in to and is complimentary to a residential development. He agreed but only to a point. He feels he lives in a low density area with a high density church which is over saturating the community and is no longer complimentary to the area. This church is a detriment and has been for some time. Ms. Joanne James, 3233 Pierson. Ms. James is opposed for all reasons stated however is mostly concerned with noise and no sound barrier to protect neighbors. She stated that the church had no consideration of neighbors. An example given was the use of bullhorns during games last summer which continued to the point she had to close her windows. Mr. Jerome Sisneen, 3395 Quail Street. Mr. Sisneen is a professional planner and has been a resident of the area for two weeks. He stated that this cannot be planned in a vacuum and is opposed to the proposal. He stated that he believes the whole area needs a master plan and f landscape plan. He feels this proposal does not fit in the neighborhood. Mr. Will Sugai, 11158 W. 33rd Avenue. Mr. Sugai agrees with most concerns said and added that he feels that there is no master plan and that the church is piece mealing this project together. He further stated that he does not feel the neighborhood issues have really been addressed and that it has been a mockery and a white wash by the church. Ms. Jeannie Hill, 3345 Quail Street. Ms. Hill stated she is for the proposal and disagrees with many of her neighbors. She feels the church has been a good influence in the community. She stated that she has enjoyed the open space for 20 years but realistically believes that where there is a church there will be expansion. She says change is hard as is proved by those in attendance. She stated that a letter was distributed to the neighborhood from a concerned person but feels it was conflicting in some parts. She relayed that the letter stated that the most important thing was to preserve the quite and serene character of the neighborhood which is in jeopardy. Later on the last page she describes the quite neighborhood with blaring radios, increased traffic, parking, etc., and Ms. Hill does not understand how it could be both ways. She feels the youth ministry is an extremely important part of the church's mission. She feels it is their property and it is a free country. Mr. Dave Cole, 3050 Quail Street, Lakewood. Mr. Cole is opposed to the project as proposed and agrees with those comments made previously. 19 Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 Page 10 Mr. Pat Bray, 3065 Quail Street, Lakewood. Mr. Bray is opposed to the project and agrees with opponents. Mr. Tom George, 3184 Routt St., Lakewood. Mr. George is opposed to the project and although he feels the people at the church are pretty good neighbors and good people. He believes that there should be better communication between the church and the neighborhood. The two things he is most concerned about is the noise and congestion. Ms. Barbara George, 3184 Routt St., Lakewood. She agrees with the opposition and believes that it is the beginning of the end for the neighborhood. Mr. Darren Richey, 12066 W. Virginia Place. Mr. Richey stated he is for the proposal and is a volunteer with the church working with the students. There are between 150-200 students drawn to the church with approximately 45 volunteers. He said there has been no vandalism and feels that a home field for DeEvelyn is important. Mr. Ryan Wiemer, 10941 W. Louisiana, Lakewood. Mr. Wiemer is a member of the church and a student volunteer. He stated he felt this was important because many of the students come from a background of very little home life and very little from people who are supposed to invest • and care for them. It is good that they have a place to hang out on Wednesday nights and be around those who do care about them so that they feel life is worth living. He feels this is a great opportunity to give back to the community. Mr. Lee Lloyd, 1995 Zang Street. Mr. Lloyd is a volunteer working with the youth at the church. He stated that students arriving for a game usually come in car pools which should not create a traffic problem. Most baseball fields are full and this would provide another for the students at DeEvelyn as well as giving them the opportunity to be a part of the church and to do something good. Mr. David Miller, 3485 Quail Street. Mr. Miller basically does not oppose the project. He inquired about the volleyball area and asked if it was for use by anyone. His main concerns, however, are the noise and lights. He would prefer no lights, sanitation facilities, and that games only be played until sundown. Mr. Gary Theander, 3349 Swadley. Mr. Theander is not opposed to the project and feels it would provide a nice field and facility for students. This should be a very positive experience. The noise that is being complained about are normal community noises. Mr. David DiGiacomo, 3275 Quail, Lakewood. He is opposed to the project and feels his property is more affected than most everyone else. He has observed the church grow for longer than most as well. He feels that this is an issue of good government with long term, rational, Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 10 Page 11 careful planning which is consistent with the needs of the neighborhood and all property owners. Is it good government to allow the conversion of church use to a public school use. He stated that the Rockies are providing $ l OK to a church so that it can have an exclusive use of a public school facility using this field. This is an entanglement of a church, the Rockies marketing arm, and the public school system. There has been overwhelming opposition and he feels the project has been piece mealed. He stated he has requested the church to put their parking lot lights on timers so that he can sleep and nothing has been done. Students have been in his yard loitering and using his bushes as a restroom. He said the future with the church has been dictated by the past. Ms. Robin Christians, 3159 Robb Circle, Lakewood. Ms. Christian is the author of the letter that was distributed to the neighborhood. She was upset that her area was not included in the aerial map as well as various other issues directed at the planning department. Ms. Christian stated she felt that at the neighborhood meeting there was a gross lack of information received from the church. She is totally opposed to the project and feels the church has no plan and has not addressed the issues presented to them at any time. Ms. Christians took issue with many topics from the project, the church, the neighborhood meeting, as well as, the process. Ms. Carolyn Noble, 11254 W. 38th Avenue. Ms. Noble stated that this appears to be a difficult issue but is biased about her own property. She does not believe that property owners did not perceive the future for growth and change. She believes that the church is neither a good neighbor or listener. She thinks that there should be a liaison available between the church and the community and volunteered herself to accomplish this. Her main issue is the piece and quiet which may be lost and is against the project for that reason. Ms. Georgia Canici, 3204 Pierson Street. Ms. Canici is against the project as the proposal stands at this time and requested that it be denied. Mr. Richard Fehr, 10857 W. 31st Avenue, Lakewood. Mr. Fehr is against the project and stated that members of the church including the pastor do not live in the neighborhood and cannot relate to the problems the church and this project have imposed. He is opposed to additional traffic and the affects on wildlife/environment, in addition to children's safety. He felt the parking lot that was installed was inappropriate as well with its run off going directly into Lena Gulch. He stated that they have tried to contact the church with no response. He suggested that funds from Great Outdoors Colorado (lottery funds) be requested to buy the land and assure it as open space. Mr. Pete Klammer, 3200 Routt Street. Mr. Klammer is strongly opposed to the project and feels the church is "big business" and that this is just a small portion of what is really wanted by the church. The church has been a proper but not a good neighbor. He stated that when he and his children have been walking their dog and playing frisbee, they have been escorted from the • property. planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 Page 12 very close Mr. Ralph Perri, 1090 Holland Street, Lakewood. Mr. Perri stated he owns property to the baseball fields and plans on building a house there. He does not want to live next to anything like the proposal. He suggested that if he wanted to put in tennis courts for a private club, he would not be allowed to. He does not think the church has been a good neighbor. He feels the proposal will have a total negative affect and it does not fit in the Applewood area. The church is fine, but anything more is inappropriate. jimmy Neblow, (address unreadable). He stated he completely supports the proposal and acknowledged the increased activity at the church. He stated that there has been no criminal activity occurring with students from the church. Frank Bums, 4676 Dudley. Mr. Burns is a member of the church and supports the church's proposal. He stated he would like to apologize for any perceived wrong doings which may have occurred by the church. He primarily supports the proposal to be able to reach out to kids. He also stated that no matter where a proposal such as this is presented, it will be responsible for some changes. Phil Hotsenpiller, 124 S. Joy Street, pastor of the church. Mr. Hotsenpiller stated he does not want to be a bad neighbor and apologized for wrong doing. He stated that the master plan will make the neighborhood life easier. The reason he stated was that if the church continues to grow as it is now, approximately 300 members a year, a third service will be initiated in the fall which will extend the time of church services. He said that if they don't have a master plan that will seat more people, additional services will have to be added which will be nonstop. He stated that the church will make every effort to be a better neighbor and finther, that the original plan had been scaled down for this reason to about one-third of what it was. He stated that notes are put on cars parked on the street to request that they park in the parking lot and that they have tried to keep things in line. He said he does not want to build buildings for buildings sake ...but for peoples sake and feels that they maintain the property appropriately. Steve Saunders, 11734 W. 33rd Avenue. Mr. Saunders is not a member of the church but stated he cannot imagine a better use of the land. He would not support a housing development however, he supports fully the use of the land as a baseball field and commended the church. Robert Reed, 11157 W. 31st Avenue. Mr. Reed is opposed to the project. He stated that every time the church has expanded, things have gotten worse including traffic, trash, thefts, trespassing, property damage, etc.. Scott Wilcox, 3137 Robb Circle. Mr. Wilcox is the father of a boy who was struck by an automobile from the church. He stated that he attended the hearing regarding the parking lot which he opposed. He does not feel that the church listens to the concerns of the neighborhood. He stated that the associate pastor parks on the street every week. I* Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 • Page 13 Ann Whitehead, 11127 W. 31st Avenue. Ms. Whitehead questioned what the connection was between the school and church and why only one school would be allowed to use the ball field. Robin Christians returned to the podium with additional comments. She wanted to answer the previous woman's question (Ms. Whitehead) and provide clarification to the Commission. She requested the church to correct her if her facts were incorrect. She stated that the connection between DeEvelyn High School and the church is that through the Colorado Rockies Baseball Team, a $ l OK grant was awarded to the church for a community project. However, there was a condition attached to the grant which was that DeEvelyn High School be allowed to use the fields. Church members stated this was incorrect. Chairperson WILLIAMS directed the speaker to address the Commission only. She stated that the Commission should find out the answer to this question if she is incorrect. She also stated she wanted to know how can anybody who awards funding, dictate who can use property in a residential area. The main issue at this meeting is not so much the baseball fields, but the use of the fields by others than the church especially by a school that has a field already in addition to batting cages. She believes that everyone has been misled. She said that she had not been asked by "the woman on the end" (Commissioner Brinkman) as to what she would like to see done with the'property. Ms. Christians stated the church could make a charitable donation to the community, ask the City of Wheat Ridge to purchase it as part of their open space, Outdoor Colorado was also mentioned, and one other is having the church divide and move elsewhere. Discussion was held regarding the neighbors contacting the police department regarding noise or other problems, development of a contact committee between the neighborhood and church, what would be the next step for the church should the proposal not be approved, if the request could be approved with conditions requiring the church to return with a specific plan that the Commission could review. Ms. Reckert clarified the questions and stated that the case could be continued if additional information is necessary, before a decision is made. The church has a right of appeal if they disagree with the conditions placed by the Planning Commission. Commissioner SNOW motioned, Commissioner CERVENY seconded, to continue Case No. CUP-97-3 so a compromise could be reached between the church and the neighborhood, to a date no later than August, 1997, that Staff pick an appropriate date of review, and that this case will be the only case heard that evening. Motion carried 5-0. Directives as received from Commissioner SNOW are as follows: 1. The field and volleyball pits be limited to use by the church only. 2. The path to the restrooms be opened and available for all games. 3. Delete the requirement for bleachers. That a drawing be provided that shows that they are no higher than 2 or 3 levels at the most • Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 • Page 14 4. That there either be no lights or no lights later than 9:00 p.m. for the volleyball pit. 5. Address the issue of noise protection for the volleyball courts. 6. No bullhorns allowed. 7. Current parking lot lights go off at night. 8. The City of Wheat Ridge make a formal request of the City of Lakewood to allow parking on nearby Lakewood streets for residents only. 9. Any neighbor is allowed to submit to the Planning Department additional conditions that they think would be fair. Ms. Reckert stated that the conditions were very broad and that hopefully a compromise could be arrived at. Commissioner SNOW stated that these where only her comments and that perhaps no one else on the Commission will agree with her. Commissioner RASPLICKA motioned, Commissioner SNOW seconded, that the church provide a master plan instead of a piece meal plan to the Commission. Motion carried 5-0 Ms. Reckert stated that requesting a master plan from the church could open up a whole set of new issues. Commissioner RASPLICKA stated that he didn't feel that the church could provide a master plan at the next meeting to consider this case. He feels that this case needs to be reviewed at the earliest possible date. He still felt, however, that a master plan is in order. Commissioner CERVENY motioned, Commissioner BRINKMAN seconded, that the motion to request a master plan be reconsidered. Motion carried 5-0. Ms..Reckert stated that a long range planning document should be submitted so that the Commission would be aware of what may be requested in the future. Commissioner CERVENY added the following directives: 1. Limit church activities as far as a baseball field would be concerned. 2. Other items can be determined by negotiations between the neighborhood and church. Commission BRINKMAN added the following directives: 1. The church to develop a recreation committee to get together with the neighbors to identify the issues and work together to resolve them. 2. The church to develop another committee to deal with general issues of the neighborhood. Many of the issues brought forward at this meeting were not related to the project and may have been resolved prior to the meeting resulting in a shorter meeting and an easier decision. She feels the pastor should possibly be involved as well. i 0 0 Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 1997 Page 15 8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING 9. OLD BUSINESS 10. NEW BUSINESS Ms. Glum advised the Commissioners that the dinner for retired commissioners would be held May 9th and asked if they could check their calendars for conflict. The meeting which was canceled due to weather regarding Light Industrial zoning changes that was to take place with City Council, has been rescheduled to May 19, 1997, in City Council chambers. 11. DISCUSSION AND DECISION ITEMS 12. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS 13. ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at 130 am b consensus Marilyn Gunn, Recording Secretary 0 ~' 'o' FAX PHONE: ~Q~' FAX: PHON ~~ti~ ~' § 266 RR~.AT RIDGE CITY CODE Sec. 26.6. legislative and administratrve pro• cess and procedures. This section sets forth the proced~ r h anarious stantive requirement's which apply administrative and legislative Pbe re uired by lished by this rnde, and as may q other city ordinances and/or state law, where ap- plicable. (A) Conditional Uses: Conditional uses aze per- mitted uses which aze subject to review to ensure that they are properly designed, developed, oper• ated and maintained so as to be appropriate far specific locations within a zone district wherein the conditional use is specifically enumerated. The primary issues which the planning commission shall address aze those special design consider- ations which mitigate potetZtial detrimental im- pacts oC a conditional use on surrounding land uses, the street systems, or public services or fa- cilities. In order to achieve compatibility, the plan- ning commission, and city council upon appeal, shall have the right to approve, approve with mod- ifications, or deny a conditional use request. (1) Applicability. The requirements of this sub- section shall apply to all uses listed as "Con- ditional Uses" within any particulaz zone district. (2) Application dorm and review procedures: (a) Prior to submitting any application far a conditional use permit, the applicant shall be required to hold a neighbor hood input meeting (see subsection (F)(1) for requirements). (b) Conditional use applications may be originated only by the fee owners of the property or by his attorney or le• gaily designated agent by power-of- attorney. (c) Application shall be submitted on forms provided by the department of plan- ningand development, and shall be ac• companied by a copy of the property deed, a certified boundary or improve- ment survey, and a fee of one hundred dollazs ($100.001. (d) All applications shall also be accompa- nied by a site development plan and additional written information in sut- Supp No. la ficient detail to convey the full intent of the applicant in developing, oper- ating and maintaining the conditional use. The site plan shall meet the re- quirements of aTYPE ISITE PLADI as set forth in subsection (E)(1). (e) Upon receipt of a complete application described above, the plan- packet, as ning and development department shall proceed as follows: 1. Refer the application to affected ~~ _ public agencies for review and com• ~, ment. 2. Within thirty (30) days of accep- i n ~` ~ on tance of a completed applicat ive notice oC a scheduled t k , g e pac h lication public heazing on t e app O~ by newspaper publication, letter notification and pasting in the ~ ~ l` manner as provided in subsection (F)(1). 3. Prepaze a written report Tannin •`~~ ommendations to the p g ~~ commission, which evaluates the proposal and makes findings using the review criteria established in the following subsection (A)(3). (3) Criteria for review. Before a conditional use is approved, the applicant shall show, and the planning commission shall find, the pro• posed conditional use: (a) Will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfaze, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the pro- posed use. (b) Will not adversely affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution. (c) - Is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (d) Will not result in undue traffic conges- tion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of per- sons whether on or off the site. (e) WiII be appropriately design rkinn eluding setbacks, heights, p g. 1690 20NiNG AND DEVELOPMENT bulk, buffering, screening and land- scaping, so as to be in harmony and rnmpatible with chazacter of the sur- rounding azeas and neighborhood, es• pecially with adjacent properties. (f1 Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, pazks, schools and other public facilities and services. (4Zh Planning commission review.Planningcom- mission shall hear and consider any evi- dence or statement presented by the appli- cant, city staff, or by any person in attendance at the hearing. The planning commission shall then decide to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the appli- cation, basing its decision upon the facts presented in•the public hearing in consid- eration oC the criteria for review as speci- ~ed in subsection (3) above. Planning com• mission may impose conditions or stipulations, which may include physical de- sign as well as operational and mainte- nance considerations, upon the conditional use in addition to standard development and use regulations which apply within a paz- ticulaz zone district or For a similaz "per- mitted use." Such conditions or stipula- tions may be imposed in order to ensure compliance with the criteria for review, which, if not complied with, shall be grounds Cor revocation of the conditional use. (5) Appeal. An applicant, or any aggrieved property owner within six hundred (600) feet of the subject property, may appeal the decision of the planning commission to city council by filing such appeal, along with an e:cplanation for the appeal, with the Wheat Ridge City Cterk within ten (I01 working days after the date of the planning commis- sion hearing. Upon such appeal, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the city council, following the same public notice requirements and procedures set forth far the planning commission hearing. City council, in addition to consideration of tfie planning commission record, shall hear ad- ditional evidence and testimony presented, § 26-6 and shall decide to sustain, amend or reject the planning commission decision, with its decision being based upon all evidence pre- sented and the planningcommission record, with due consideration of the criteria Cor review. (6) Enforcement. All conditions and stipula- tions imposed by the planning commission or city council shall be maintained in per- petuity with the special use. If at any time the stipulations or conditions aze not ad- hered to or aze found to have been materi• ally altered in scope, application or design, the zoning administrator shall notify a code enforcement officer oC the nature of the vi• olation(s) and the code enforcement of icer shall initiate standard enforcement proceed- ings. Supp No i•° 1G91 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT - bulk, buffering, screening and land- scaping, so as to be in harmony and rnmpatible with chazacter of the sur- rounding areas and neighborhood, es- pecially with adjacent properties. (t) Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, pazks, schools and other public facilities and services. (41,. Planning commission revieu~.Planningcom- mission shall heaz and consider any evi- dence ar statement presented by the appli- cant, city staff, or by any person in attendance at the hearing. The planning commission shall then decide to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the appli- cation, basing its decision upon the facts presented i'n~.he public hearing in consid- eration of the criteria for review as speci- fied in subsection (3) above. Planning com- mission may impose conditions or stipulations, which may include physical de- sign as well as operational and mainte- nance considerations, upon the conditional use in addition to standard development and use regulations which apply within a paz- ticulaz zone district or for a similaz "per- mitted use." Such conditions or stipula- tions may be imposed in order to ensure compliance with the criteria for review, which, iC not complied with, shall be grounds for revocation of the conditional use. (5) Appeal. An applicant, or any aggrieved property owner within six hundred (600) feet oCthe subject property, may appeal the decision of the planning commission to city council by Oiling such appeal, along with an explanation Cor the appeal, with the Wheat Ridge City Clerk within ten (10) working days after the date of the planning commis- sion heazing. Upon such appeal, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the city council, Fallowing the same public notice requirements and procedures set forth for the planning commission hearing. City council, in addition to consideration of tl~e planning commission record, shall hear ad- ditional evidence and testimony presented. § 26.6 and shall decide to sustain, amend or reject the planning commission decision, with its decision being based upon alI evidence pre- sented and the planning commission record, with due consideration of the criteria for review. (6) Enforcement. All conditions and stipula- tions imposed by the planning commission or city council shall be maintained in per- petuity with the special use. If at any time the stipulations or conditions aze not ad- hered to or are found to have been materi- ally altered fn scope, application or design, the zoning administrator shall notify a code enforcement officer of the nature of the vi- olation(s) and the code enforcement officer shall initiate standard enforcement proceed- ings. $upp Nn l3 1691 § 26-6 R>I~AT RIDGE CITY CODE Sec. 26-6. Legislative and adnrinistrativepro- cess and procedures. This section sets forth the procedural and sub- stantive requirement's which apply to the various administrative and legislative processes estab- lished by this code, and as may be required by other city ordinances and/or state law, where ap- plicable. (A) Conditional Uses: Conditional uses are per• mitted uses whic~l aze subject to review to ensure that they aze properly designed, developedate for ated and maintained so as to be appropr specific locations within a zone district wherein the conditional use is specifically enumerated. The primary issues which the planning commissien shall address aze those special design consider- ations which mitigate poter}tial detrimental im- pacts of a conditional use on surrounding land uses, the street systems, or public services or fa- cilities. Inorder to achieve compatibility, the plan- ning commission, and city council upon appeal, shalt have the right to approve, approve with mod- ifications, or deny a conditional use request. (1) Applicability. The requirements of this sub- sectionshall apply to all uses listed as "Con- ditional Uses" within any particular zone district. (2) Application form and review procedures: (a) Prior to submitting any application for a conditional use permit, the applicant shall be required to hold a neighbor- hood input meeting (see subsection (F)(1) for requirements). (b) Conditional use applications may be originated only by the fee owners of the property or by his attorney or le- gally designated agent by power•of- attorney. (c) Application shall be submitted on forms provided by the department of plan- ning and development, and shall be ac- companied by a copy of the property deed, a certified boundary or improve- ment survey, and a fee of one hundred dollars ($100-001. (d) All applications shall also be accompa- nied by a site development plan and additional written information in su[ ficient detail to convey the full intent of the applicant in developing, oper- ating and maintaining the conditional use. The site plan shall meet the re- quirements of aTYPE ISITE PLAN as set forth in subsection (E)(1). (e) Upon receipt of a complete application packet, as described above, the plan- ning and development department shall proceed as follows: 1. Refer the application to affected public agencies for review and com- ment. 2. Within thirty (30) days of accep- tance of a completed application packet, give notice of a scheduled public hearing on the application by newspaper publication, letter notification and posting in the manner as provided in subsection (F)(1). 3. Prepare a written report and rec- ommendations to the planning commission, which evaluates the proposal and makes findings using the review criteria established in the following subsection (A)(3). (3) Criteria for review. Before a conditional use is approved, the applicant shall show, and the planningcommission shall find, the pro- posed conditional use: (a) Will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfaze, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the pro- posed use. (b) Will not adversely affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution. (c) - Is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (d) Will not result in undue traffic conges- tion or traffic hazards, or unsafe pazking, loading, service or internal trafl`ic conflicts to the detriment of per- sons whether on or off the site- (e) Will be appropriately designed, in- eluding setbacks, heights, parking, 1690 Supp Vo. 14 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT bulk, buffering, screening and land- scaping, so as to be in harmony and crompatible with character of the sur- rounding areas and neighborhood,es- pecially with adjacent properties. (q Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, pazks, schools and other public facilities and services. (4),, Planning commission review. Planning com- mission shall hear and consider any evi- dence or statement presented by the appli- cant, city staff, or by any person in attendance at the hearing. The planning commission shall then decide to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the appli- cation, basing its decision upon' the facts presented i`n-the public hearing in consid- eration of the criteria for review as speci- ~ed in subsection (3) above. Planning com- mission may impose conditions or stipulations, which may include physical de• sign as well as operational and mainte- nance considerations, upon the conditional use in addition to standazd development and use regulations which apply within a paz- ticulaz zone district or for a similaz "per- mitted use." Such conditions or stipula- tions may be imposed in order to ensure compliance with the criteria for review, which, if not complied with, shall be grounds for revocation of the conditional use. (5) Appeal. An applicant, or any aggrieved property owner within six hundred (600) feet of the subject property, may appeal the decision of the planning commission to city council by filing such appeal, along with an explanation for the appeal, with the Wheat Ridge City Clerk within ten (10) working days after the date of the planning commis- sion heazing. Upon such appeal, a public heazing shall be scheduled before the city council, following the same public notice requirements and procedures set Corth for the planning commission hearing. City council, in addition to consideration of the planning commission record, shall hear ad- ditional evidence and testimony presented, § zs-s and shall decide to sustain, amend or reject the planning commission decision, with its decision being based upon all evidence pre- sented and the planning commission record, with due consideration of the criteria for review. (6) Enforcement. All conditions and stipula- tions imposed by the planning commission or city council shall be maintained in per- petuity with the special use. If at any time the stipulations or conditions aze not ad- hered to or are found to have been materi- ally altered in scope, application or design, the zoning administrator shall notify a code enforcement officer of the nature of the vi- olation(s) and the code enforcement officer shall initiate standard enforcement proceed- ings. Snpp. No. 14 1691 HP OfficeJet Personal Printer/Fax/Copier Iderttifacation 96944410 >in esult OK Fax Log Report for DEVREVFAX 303 235 2857 Apr-11-97 02:59 PM P~ Tvne D_ a_te Time Duration Dia¢nostic 03 Sent Apr-11 02:56P 00:02:12 002585030022 ~~ • W H E A T ,~~~ U 7 5 0 0 WE S,T 2 9TH ~A-V E N,U E F c s I M C E RBI D G E WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO R02 t~5~ FAX# (303) 235-2857 i~ 1~' ~" I To: W I LF~G~i~ ~.3L~~3"~ ~ - _1 From: ,/r°,~~/l~~ ~' Date: ~ ~' ~1 '"y` .. _ _ - - _~ I No. of Pages ~ _ ' (nat including ca~~cr sheet) j Comments: /VI f~~ f k ~/Gi CSC ~..- !/~~" ~. ~ 4•..~ (7 ~,~ 5 77 U/lf S f~~1`t L.. I~'t !S s4` ~- _, \. ~~ PLANNING ANU %UN1NG PARKS AND RECRE_aT~UN ~'UDl-IC ~t~01tK5 °" 303 235-2877 (303)235-2861 (303)235-2846 t ) W E E A T 7500 ~~'E S,T 29TH A4EN,UE F C I M L E R I D G E WHEAT R(OGE, COLOR AD OR02"f5 BAX# (303) 235-2857 I( I From: (` `~t°[~e r ~ _ ... .. i .. -. _ _ ..- ,..- 1_ .,.. I ~o. or Pages s (not including cover sheet) j Com cents: ~ ` _ - ~ ~; _. - .. •_~ . _ , .. - ~. , ~~ ,..__ !'CANNING AND '/.LINING PARKS AND RECRE-~T~ lUh I~L~['303`235t2861 : ,a- = - (303)235-2877 - - ( ) (303)235-2846 : ~D.B~n/ ~q~lvT/~n1 S FAX: ~~~- yy~o PHONE: ~.®~ FAX: , PHONE: 0 0 ~`~ HP OfficeJet Fax Log Report for Personal Printer/Fax/Copier DEVREVFAX 303 235 2857 Apr-21-97 02:29 PM Identifieation Date Time Duration Dia¢uostic 96944410 OK 04 Sent Apr-21 02:27P 00:01:51 002585030022 ,.~ . • • Fax Log Report for HP Office3et DEVREVFAX Personal Printer/Fax/Copier 303 235 2857 Apr-11-97 10:41 AM Date Time _ Duration D~ - ~ ~- _ Result Paves Tvne ___._ is osiic Identi£tcation 98411680 OK 04 Sent Apr-11 10:39A 00:02.02 002586030022 pan ~ ~ ~ Fax Log Report for HP Office7et DEVREVFAX Personal Printer/Fax/Copier 303 235 2857 Apr-11-97 02:43 PM - __.. identification Result Pages Tune Date ime Duration Diaanostic 94316783 OK 03 Sent Apr-11 02:40P 00:02:48 002084230020 t~, ~~ ~s ~ .7~ ~n d ~ V . ~ J,~ ~ ~- c'._, ~: ~1 ~ lei him FAX: PHONE: ~'~~ FAX: PHONE: x' • ** CO11 ti ``** C011 'b] d ~' ** COii `.. Miller ': ~t r T ~ ``/ David C.. 34 ai ~~ck 0 Toole_ _ 3455 Quail ST e CO 80033-5408 -Quail ST e CO 80033-5408 Whe Ridg at Ridge CO 80033_-5408 Wheat Ridg_. ;_ ** C000 ** C011 0 ** CU11 Timothy F Coursey 3395 Quail ST Wheat Ridge CO 80033-5441 ** C013 John A Odom 11490 W 38th Ave -- Wheat Ridge CO 80033-3802 ** C021 Jer y B Tuth A e 11 56 W;,aRP CO 800 ** C021 F John Batug 11252 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033-3908 ** C005 Leila J Hill 3345 Quail ST Wheat Ridge CO 80033-5441 ** C021 Gary P Day 11350 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033-3958 ** C021 B CO 80033-3908 ** 0004 Open Lands Colorado 5555 Dtc Pky #2050 Englewood CO 80111-3005 ** C020 RQ h J Pand 18 Lakewood CO 80 Ro ey J ick 11 3 32nd Ave 0033-54 7 Wheat Ridge C YI¢Gtr-t~ 13 • G~I.L~ ~,3 i o $ou,rf `~ D id D1 G 5 6 r Arvada O 80002-1818 ** C017 Louis J Ficco 3650 Vance ST Wheat Ridge CO 80033-6293 _ ~* C021 Howard G Noble 11254 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033-3908 ** C021 g est' e W' liams 11 Ave eat Ridge 3-3969 W tL S o03'3 ~---- {. ,I --- ., 'rn~~_ ~ _ ' i G2~J ~~ C ~c `~ 3a-ei ~ ~u~ l S t . ..;'I ~' I 5w~ Gc, i r~~r~s J r~. ~3 ~~ C~;~ ;;. ,~o lv veS ~~~~~!' ~,32~v ~~ S+, .. ~~ ~ D 7~ (~ ~c c1 S f. a k,,,,,rvMO.. ~Ot!'a' ~J~y3~5 ~~ 3~~~~- ~,~ f ves~~ a Y ~ (~ vi. ~ s~e ~~ i ~z~ g_ Cr~u,~ .~ ~ .;;thy/1~s ~' ~ ~ /2~ G~ Sf j v ~ ~ ~ v~l . ~ ~ .. of<<;n ~ {~ l 3~~-, ~u-a-` 1 s t " -- F ~--.i~ yam-/-•YSo-K s~ 8a v s. r s .~-s _ ~' y .~ ., w ~2. , _ _.. ..I _ _. _ . r,J 2 _ .. __.. , - --- ~, ., .. .. _ ,~Ll ~ S Q~G~ ~ I ~ ; w_2 .. f. ,~,~qv~ ~ /2. Call-e. _ ~.. ;r--- ,3c~5~ ~u a r I -- _ i ..; --~ .., S~ S ~Yt !-~ccdaUG~ i ~ ~a a- .:~ ~ . ~ I st ~4 v~ .. ... _.::i _ ___ ___. .._ _- _-. ,:~ ~_ 11.0-~?~r h -~ C` fz ~%f s-~i a~ --~ _------ 10961 West 30th Place Lakewood, Colorado 80215 May 6, 1997 ~(~~ `,. Mpy~r~g The City of Wheat Ridge Wheat Ridge Planning Division `~~~ 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215-6713 Dear Sir: Please send all information concerning Case No. CUP-97-03 to the following address: 1. 10961 West 30th Place Lakewood, Colorado 80215- Past correspondence has been sent to 10961 West 30th Place, Wheat Ridge, Colorado _80033 instead of Lakewood. Sincerely, ~~~~~ ~~ in to~/~i Edward A. Watl g MEMORANDUM ~ DATE: May 12, 1997 ~lqy ~~~ TO: Planning Commissi ,City of Whe tridge `~`~~ f ~ ,99 j < FROM: Steve Saunders ~ `~~ 11734 W. 33rd Ave, Wheatridge, Co. 80033. 238-2072 ~~~. RE: Proposed Baseball field at 33rd and Route area. `~ Applewood Baptist Church CC: Dan Wilde I am not a member of the church. I strongly ask for the commission to review this case. Our city is about to let a wonderful opportunity pass us by. The Applewood Baptist Church and the Colorado Rockies are committed to funding a state of the art ball park in Wheatridge. In my opinion, there could be no better use of the land. There would be no increase in pollution, noise, traffic etc., and we get a much needed ball park. It is very rare that a city of our size has the honor of considering 2 solid groups that want to invest in our city. The issues raised by the neighbors of the proposed park were either answered by the church : Security, bathrooms, lights, hours, parking, and overall construction concerns were all addressed by the church and will be handled; or other concerns were not applicable to the building of the ball park: concems about the parking on Sundays, hours for the Wednesday night youth nights etc. Those concems are between predominately Lakewood residents and their neighbor, the Church. I was excited when the planning commission announced that their preliminary decision x~as to a!!ow the building of the ballpark. Somewhere aver the next 5 hours the issue became very clouded by neighbor problems. Very few issues were raised about a baseball field being built, and those issues had already been addressed by the Church. The issues that seemed to confuse the issue were not ballpark related. I felt that the Church was being a good neighbor by listening to the public, and standing tall under vicious accusations from their neighbors. I imagine that the Church could have gone ahead and built the park without asking too much..after all it is their land and they would simply be improving an existing ballpark. Lets not let a great investment in Wheatridge pass us by. The real issue is whether a free ballpark fits into the Wheatridge city boundaries in land zoned for its use. Please move quickly, it would be a shame to have significant dollars from two private investors go elsewhere. ~ ,~ ~,ti ~ wft~( S `f ~~ `~ 11• '" MEMORANDUM of w"eqr ~ ~: ~ o To: Case File CUP-97-3/Applewood Babtist Church U m From: Glen Gidley, Planning & Development Director co~oRPOo Re: Religous Revival Event Date: May 13, 1997 ,' Pastor Larry Fulton of the Applewood Babtist Church contacted me on May 7, 1997 regarding any requirements which the City may impose on the church regarding a Summer Revival Event which the church is scheduling for one week in June. He indicated that it would primarily serve the existing congregation, and would involve the use of three tents to be placed upon the vacant portion of church property at 11225 W. 32nd Ave. As Zoning Administrator I made the decision that an event such as the church has planned, is a traditional and customary accessory use to a permitted church use. The use of tents would need to meet the following 1. The Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District should review plans for the erection and ,'' placement of said tents. 2. The tents should not be placed upon any parking areas which are necessary to meet the minimum requirements of the church, per the Zoning Code. 3. No building permit is required for the placement of such temporary shelters. Applewood Baptist Church 11220 West 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 August 22, 1997 Ms. Meredith Reckert Planning Department City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80215-6713 Re: Applewood Baptist Church -Conditional Use Permit Dear Ms. Reckert, AUC ~ n 1997 As per your request, Applewood Baptist Church would like to withdraw it's request for a Conditional Use Permit for a ball field and volleyball pit on our property at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. As you are aware, we are continuing to meet with neighborhood representatives on a regular basis and will hopefully work toward an acceptable master plan for the Church's property at this location which we plan to bring back to the City's attention at a later date. Sincerely, /UA~X David W. Llo d~ Chairman, Building, Planning, Maintenance and Transportation Committee cc: Duffy Deardorff, Associate Pastor Tim F. Coursey, D.D.S. 30500 U. S. Highway 40 golden, Colorado 80401 .~ . Ar'R ~ 0 1997 ~~f~t ~~~ 1~9~ ~i'~a,rtl~ .j du. ~or ~~e G®i ~~Jc l,~-s (-i(r, 7r~f,~te ~ ab n~~( ~e ve_ ~o~rar e~t`5 p ,,L `~ ltiu. ~ cur l "~ e r ~ ~7 s ,^~ ~ ~ `~ h ,.v e, .5 0 (~ ©~c ~ 1 /~ p ~ S ~./O ~/L ~ n o i.r7 ~t-o ~s e- ee n ~ rri ~ v ~~~ 7 0 l~ o ~a ~ n - I W e. w ~ r 2 ~ X- ~' i` e ,(n 2 ~ y l n l e.~ 2 5 1'e.~X 7 n tJ O ~ ~C G~ (V e-~Y ! /i k P e -~ n ~ /~ ~ I ~ u~ 000r P~ G~ ,0 T ~ 9 ~ O u-~ ( l r O 1 ~ h .~- I Ce-n Vj ,,~1 O rx d' /~'l ~ ~/ 2 t,vcc S ~ rt ~ 2~ ecP ~~~~ lo~~,~~¢ ~ ~..~ rot ~5; I r ( yy ~7k.G~~u~rG~'t~5 ~(.c~iViCIeS. ~~ ~-~~ ~{ y~~ ~~ II _- _ _ ~.~.o ff ~ ~rs o f .~ 3 ~.~ C~~~s ~ _ S~ ~-~' ~ ; ~h ~ new Ou7 n ~~K~~ J c.. s o m e /c c _e z n e y v J ~_. ~cf ,.c ~.1 ~i nQ l ~~ a.J'L ,~~~~l,~+-~( nQ--p~(k ~..~t~ oCIJ u~anl ~O D~ ,T~(( ~1ou, etie/~/ ne~ GL. / ~ che~~~O~c~ `t~1e ene~r~SecP~rocl~urQ / ~- . ~ ~. ~, ~c a ~ a y ,~ c o ~ ~'~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ < ~ ~ o ~ ~ ._ L g , a o ~' ~ `° ' ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ... ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ w ~ ° d L~ ~ ~c p , ~ , d ~ ' tss x o ~ ~ ~ •-f ~ =' ~ 5' :~ co ~ ~ ~ o tai ~, '-' «~ ,"~' O ~ N m ~ X17 ~ N ~ ~. L~1LltlSE ~` ~It91C~2S1 30340£1.5. Y$~vy 40 CialdOn.fc+lOtadO 80441 Floot~e 303-52C¢2f11 ut800-308-2R~11 ~W o~ w~ ~~ ~~ 00 ~~ ~~ o" ~. v m ~' ~~ o ~ c ~' ~ -~ ~ ~ 4 x \~ 0 ~ . 7 u' ~ ~ .pt - H C ° 5 ~ -~ -- B rn ~ o m s rn m .,. ° ° ~ _ . p- w ~ o gy , O ~ ~ 3 p, c O y O -~ O ~" 0 ~ ~^p rn ~ o m -w ~ _ -~ ~W r'T ~ ~ ~._ ~ Y M ~~ ~ l0 c fD ~ w n N ° ~y . c iT -...~ w o ~ ~ ~ l R. 6 m ~ •* '3 OC 9 H ~ ~, __ r ~ ..: T O . . - ~~ ~ m ~ ~ ~. P p ~ ~ ~ - _ o - _ 3c . m ti w . ao `C e _ _ y C C ~~- R' y _•.m `'C G (D .~ M a m w m C~ .~'.. f 7 (U O ~• 0 ~ N ~ m w ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ w o ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . w c " ~ o. ~ ~ s :° ^. n ~ o n H ~' S_ o n ~ m .~. p ~ 'n _. ~ ~_ , ~. m p N i ~ - p Ott ~ ~ ' ~ m y ~' ~, ~ ~ w ~ v~ ~ 0. ~ . ~ o G ~ c O n ~ y m- ~ w Q ~. ~ o a ~ W w ~ ~ o ~ o , ~ N ^ N ^h ~ ~ `G ~ '~ ~ F ~ N ~ C7 w+ O ~ `C ~ c'~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ .. ~ p O ~ n m ~Y .p. .t _ "- ~ B ~ o ~ o - ~ o p ~pf~ y T. » m ~ w ~ ~ ~ d ~ - - ~ ~ N ~ ? r ~ . gy , n ( fi ~` ~ ~ ~ ~ O C ~ ~ 0. O Q4 O . w . as o p ~ Sp m ~ ~ , .,, , ~_ ~ ~ ti ~ ~. _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ O (D CD M O ~ zL y ^ G 6 'w' O G _ N ~ C O Q qq O LT Q h O ''~ ."s O 7~ ~ `~- +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B ^ rn w _°1.. a _ w m h 0 y~ ,Y /~ -_~V f- ni -'I ;~~~t -4: 6 w 1y n C- (D ^v y C. - V ~ - - ~ - ~ ' o Q' O m o_ ^ y- - .ta y W 6 a. ~ ~ y ~ - O. ~ ~ n m w y3 J ~+ - ^ ^ S .d a ~ N pp p _ O m ? j- O _ y~wy}n m d J ~ C~ ~ A p N '~ ~. N V v ~ fP ~ , ee S. c - o ~ yoG V. , ~ - _ - _ __ (g~ wr'S w d N ~( v~' N '~ y r. .+. -I C - ~ m ~+ R N ` ' o' oo y cam' ~ ~.. m O a ~ __ w ~ N f ro o ~ _ - m 7 q 0 - B __ _ r.. P.2 Jug o s iss~ I 1 APRIL90, 1 7 1'o m h may CGnCBnI: We are strongly ap to the basetsall and Volip II Held utter at Appl t3eptlst church, We feel' would it d Impact our nei greatly. The lights, noise, and tratfid WOuitl rulh our Haig rhood and change our famii e dram Ucafly. our nackyar would na longer be a pleasant ~ lace to tse. case carrelder the ighbortwod families before you aka ~Y h ty dedslona. .. ~ Singer ly, ~~' ~ ' t Nancy J. , s 322o Roth Wheat Rldg CO F~QQ~(# T4'J CdCL`CCi•C9C ~•4FIi iHiYd 4M7f1'I l :HOtld L8&6E6i :Dl 6LE555bEQB :`~i08d LD"'I. 9b:b1 ~D16D i _ _ - u • • ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 l~~ ' ~ ~~ ~~~, ~~~~ cue- ~:~~~ i lam"" ~ ~ ~° ~ `.~ ~~~/o~;~~~ i ~. ~ ~~~ Leo .~~' .o c c~~~c/ ~e~ ,~ o~ G ~6~~~ G~,tiza-~t=G~eo ,tea .~ .~`z~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ -~~ ' ~. ~,~ ~~~ G~ ~v~~- a- ~'~' ~~ ~ ~ c /~ ~ ~~ ~ a s~ .~ d--~~% ~~~ ~ , ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~z~ ~o ~~., .~ ~~ ~-- ~ ~ ~~ ~- ~ ~ ~ _ - ~ ~ ~~, ~°~ , ~~ I ~ E~ ~~ ~ .-~r~ -~-fie ~~~~ ~O ~~ ~..~ , ~,~~r/icr ~~:~w ~ yid' ~ .oi~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ • ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ,~ ~~~~~ ,. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ L ~ ~-o~~ ~~ ~x~ G~ ~. ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~;~.~ ~ Gov 3~ ..~ Apri12&, 1997 City of Wheat Ridge Department of Planning and Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 RE: Approval of Conditional Use Permit Applewood Baptist Church, 11225 W. 32nd Avenue Attention: Planning Commission F! .~ . This letter expresses the Applewood Neighborhood's concerns and opposition to the proposed conditional use permit for a baseball diamond and volleyball pit at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. The Applewood Baptist Church prepared the permit request and presented it to our community at a Neighborhood Meeting on April 11. We request the Planning Commission keep an open mind and consider our concerns when deciding permit approval. We understand Mr. Glen Gidley of the Wheat Ridge Planning Office has submitted a recommendation to the Planning Commission supporting the conditional use permit request. On what information is Mr. Gidley basing his decision when he has not personally attended any of the three public meetings held in the past two years? Ms. Meredith Reckert, the Planner from Mr. Gidley's office who attended these meetings, indicated to the community -both at the most recent public meeting and via telephone following that meeting -that our concerns are valid and were not properly addressed by the Applewood Baptist Church. Furthermore, Ms. Reckert stated she could not make a recommendation for a public hearing with the Planning Commission until community concerns had been properly considered and resolved by the Applewood Baptist Church. When residents asked the public hearing being held, anyway, Ms. Reckert explained that the Building, Planning, Maintenance and Transportation Committee for the church told her: "the neighborhood is not going to like anything we propose, so we have decided to proceed despite your [Ms. Reckert's] recommendation not to move forward with the permit application." What does this say about the Applewood Baptist Church's regard for the residential community that has provided them a home? Following, we have addressed the statements in the letter submitted with the Applewood Baptist Church's permit application. Although the Wheat Ridge Planning Office has already submitted a StaffReport outlining their conditions for granting the conditional use permit, we hope you will also consider the comments that follow: Item No. 2: Why is recreational activity necessary until 10:00pm by artificial lightning? "Very limited use of the field and pits will occur during the months of October to March"; therefore, during the summer months, outside play should continue only until dark (which is typically S:OOam-8:30pm) as it does for our neighborhood youth. Item No. 3: "It is not in our plan at this time" to do anything about sound buffering. Noise pollution is one of the neighborhood's biggest concerns. If it is not in the plan now, will it ever be if the Planning Commission grants the conditional use pernut without a requirement for noise buffering/abatement? Recreational activities, especially baseball, will generate noise disruptive to the enjoyment of neighboring homes, patios and/or yards, especially on weekends. If the Planning Commission permits the baseball field, they should restrict its use to church parishioners only. Item No. 4: How will the baseball diamond and volleyball pit designs prevent the glare from overhead lights from shining into the windows of adjacent properties? Industrial halogen lights are not a typical feature of a residential neighborhood. If the Planning Commission permits these facilities, additional lightning is not necessary for their "recreational" use. Item No. 5: Emergency access to the fields was never discussed at the April I I public meeting. They included the subject in their letter after receiving information from the Planning Office following the meeting. Why is emergency access required for a private recreational facility? Where will they construct the proposed path -through the wetland area neighbors are trying to preserve for the remaiuuing wildlife in our community? There is currently no "emergency access" now for the existing softball field, so why is emergency access required with the addition of a baseball field? If they require the emergency access for public use of the field, how will emergency facilities be cornacted if the building facilities are closed to non-church groups? WHl these groups pester neighbors for use of the phones during emergencies? Or, are we now discussing the addition of a public pay phone in our neighborhood? Item No. 6: "In situations where those using the fields are not doing so as a church function (i.e., DeEvelyn Baseball Team), restroom facilities will not be available." The prior zoning of this area was for a private, not-for-profit church. The proposed conditional use permit, as presented at the public meeting, is for recreational facilities for use by the Applewood Baptist Church. How is it appropriate that a private church can open recreational facilities to other groups, especially those under public jurisdiction (i.e., DeEvelyn Baseball Team}? Why does the church want to do this if they cannot accept payment for use of the field? Why don't the wishes of the surrounding residents supersede the needs of a public school? Due to current zoning laws, Planners would not grant residernial neighbors in Applewood a conditional use permit allowing use of their property for public purposes -they 2 should not grant Applewood Baptist Church one either; especially, when these "other groups" do not even live in our neighborhood. "If the field is used by a church designated group for longer than three hours, portable sanitary facilities will be provided." Port 'O Potties are not acceptable in a residential community under any circumstances. They aze unsightly, potentially unsanitary, a target for vandalism until removed, attractive to undesirable wildlife, and require large vehicles to move them in and out of an area. "This is consistent with the unavailability of restroom facilities when fields such as ours aze available on Jefferson County School property." Our neighborhood is not Jefferson County School property nor is it public properly - it is private property in a quiet, clean, suburban community. Without appropriate facilities, athletes will be forced to use surrounding trees and shrubbery and this is totally unacceptable. Item No. 7: "The entire field will be fenced to keep balls from going beyond its boundaries." How high will the fence be and of what material will it be constructed. A fence is not an aesthetic addition to our well-kept community. Item No. 8: "The baseball field will be for private use only." This statement is in direct contradiction to the statements made in Item No. 6. Or, does private use mean only use by those given a key to the fenced baseball diamond? The church is asking neighborhood residents to agree to private recreational facilities - with all the associated problems descn~bed in this letter -for use by individuals who do not live in our neighborhood. Item No. 9: "The fence azound the baseball field will be locked during times of non-use." Same response as Item No. 8. Item No. 10: "The volleyball pit lights will be no brighter than the existing ... " Same response as Item Nos. 2 and 4. Why is recreational activity necessary urnil 10:00pm by artificial lightning? Our neighborhood youth go home when it gets dark outside and the neighborhood quiets. Why can't church parishioners do the same? Industrial halogen fights are not a pleasant or typical feature of a residential neighborhood. The disrupt the quiet serenity of our evenings and already there are enough lights in the parking lots. We would enjoy seeing the evening sky but the light pollution emanating from the church parking lots already mars it. Item No. 11: "The church will look into hiring a private security company to patrol church property during times of high usage." Actually, residents are equally concerned about security during periods ofnon-usage. Nevertheless, if security is not an element in the Applewood Baptist Church's plan now, will it ever be if the Planning Commission grants the conditional use permit without security as a 3 requirement? Security must be a requirement of the permit. Item No. 12: "The field will be professionally maintained to ensure proper upkeep and pleasing visual appearance." Pleasing to whom? What impact will the use of pesticides and fertilizers -typically used to professionally maintain a playing field -have on the down gradient wetland and drainage area leading into Lena Gulch? If the Planning Commission grants the pernnt, the use of organic maintenance materials must be a requirement. Item No. 13: "The church will explore the possibility of limiting access to parking lots after hours to discourage trespassing." This statement is vague and leaves open the option to not address this issue at all. The possible use of this area as a hangout for local teenagers is a prime concern of our neighborhood. Further, when they grade and seed the area, it will ease access to the backyazds of adjacent property owners. This request for a conditional use perntit is the Applewood Baptist Church's second proposal to put recreational facilities on their property. While the current request is a very scaled down version of their first request presented last July, the Applewood Baptist Church still has no tangible, written plan for managing recreational facilities on their property, nor have they solicited or used community ideas in the preparation of their proposals. Their so-called neighborhood meeting to "discuss" their plan was afive-minute announcement of what they were planning to do. The church had no comments to offer on concerns about: noise pollution, light pollution, traffic control, trespassing onto private property, sanitation, waste management, unauthorized facility use, destruction of wildlife habitat, security, neighborhood complaints, supervision, maintenance, hours of operation, or vandalism. At the meeting, Mr. Lloyd, Chair of the church's Building, Planning, Maintenance and Transportation Committee, expressed the church's desire to rush the application process to construct and use the facilities this summer. How is this possible when crucial management issues of this facility have not been carefully considered? How can they expect that our community supported this proposal without these issues addressed in writing? Our community is not opposed to tins permit just for the sake of opposing any church plans, as the Committee would have you believe. We are opposed because the church does not have swell-thought out program and has a history of disrespect for, and poor relations with, the surrounding neighborhood. Applewood Baptist Church is not a good neighbor. As for the possible use of these facilities by organizations other than the Applewood Baptist Church, public or private, it is unclear how "conditional use" of church property can include groups outside the church. Church property was zoned for church use and at the time they zoned it, recreational facilities were never mentioned. And, the possible groups mentioned by Mr. Lloyd are not residents of the Applewood neighborhoods. Again, the details of these potential arrangements are sketchy and have not been worked out in writing. All Mr. Lloyd could offer the community was that the idea of use by non-church groups was being considered. This is not 4 sufficient. Mr. Lloyd also explained that one prime user of these facilities would be their Singles Ministry (approximately 600 members) although Pastor Trevor Bron admitted up to half these individuals are not members of the Applewood Baptist Church. Is a residential neighborhood an appropriate setting for a religious Club Med? Applewood Baptist Church is located in an older, established neighborhood. In fact, the neighborhood was established long before the church purchased the property near our homes. By continually attempting to expand the size and scope of church facilities, the peaceful, serene character of our residential community is changing. The church's master plan far a religious "campus" -which includes construction of an additional education building, an auditorium, a cathedral with seating capacity for 2,000 besides existing facilities -cannot ever be considered "compatible" with neighborhood surrounding use and design. A religious campus is not appropriate, nor wanted, in our residential neighborhood. It is no coincidence that they aze planning these facilities for the same area of the proposed baseball field. The recreational facilities are one of several stepping stones to fill and grade this open-space property in preparation for construction of the religious campus. There is also the issue of property values. The Applewood neighborhoods have all maintained a high standard of residential living that local housing prices now reflect. These standazds include well-kept, quiet, suburban neighborhoods that aze safe for our children to live and play in. The `deal" of our neighborhood does not include a busy religious campus with traffic congestion, noise pollution, and the myriad of other infrastructure and management problems associated with this type of venture. With the increased church activities of the past two years, we have already lived through the experience of one our children being struck by a car traveling at 40 mph on 32nd Avenue. While the request for sports facilities may seem innocuous to a citizen nat from our neighborhood, in the context of the church's Master Plan, this is one of several stepping stones toward their goal of a religious campus. The Planning Commission needs to evaluate the conditional use pemrit request not only in terms of the temporary use, but in the context of this larger plan to slowly fill and grade this open space animal habitat for eventual construction of religious campus. Projects completed by the Church in the past (i.e., the additional parking lot on the north side of W. 32nd Avenue) were handled deviously and without the neighborhood in mind. As adjacent property owners and neighborhood residents, we have experienced ongoing difficulties with Church activities, including: parking problems for ourselves and our guests; noise in the early morning, late evening and on weekends; trash and leaking motor oil on our properties; cars speeding out of the parking lots and through our neighborhood streets; horns honking and car radios blaring; and increased traffic congestion on W. 32nd Avenue and in our neighborhoods. Mr. Lloyd stated that the church has asked that parishioners respect the surrounding neighborhood, but he also added that the church can do no more than "ask." So, are we to add to the problems that already exist and still have no control over a greater number of people and ~'.: activities? Thank you for your consideration of our concerns. We hope that with the information provided in this letter, the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission will deny the Applewood Baptist Church's request for a conditional use permit for recreational facilities. Sincerely, 1 n ,~ p / l f ~; ~ r5 Sc ~ We r ~U 3 t 3~l i~6~ ~ C~ rv~-' ~~ 4~Ce:,~k~d~ t ~ s -- ~ n~~ o ~~ C~?~A~l f~ 3 v 9~ /~u,u: ~~'/~ ~i~r~ //~/~r~uavc~~~OO,,,,B°~,~c~ J~;Yt- /~4~~2u.~us~t C~iI 0"~~ 5 ~~~~ ~~ ~~~._ poi'/~ J ~'~i~~ ~ U o2~~' 3/x'7 ,~66 G~2 Lr~~-a G~ ~Qu 31S___. 21~IZ Aeob~ Clrc(p. 5302+5 6 ~' ~~s ~3 33 ~ r x ! i J wd+~etY ,~~ /~ ) , Ole 2 l~ , ~ ~` ~~ ~~~> i r~ ! ~-~ ~~-~ 1C~~', ~? c,J ~ .3 f S~ R.u ~ ~~F~oa~ 8 as ~~~~~ w 3l ~4~-e G~-lc~~l,~0 8oaiy~ - _~,.--_m ~ p~~~ ~ 1 ~ ,a. .q' m ; ~ - R~ . _ ~ o.. U _ ~P._~„, h - x { ~ f t f x , t ,j j ~ { _ a.. a>. A~,.~. . . ~ .a. ~ ~ x ~r s a rr.e _ . . ~ ....m., - x~ w~~ m.w~..a~.~:..., ~ro.~r.. x J x` s Q.._ F 4 i. r mRttt p,. s j'.. b 'Buxom ~ 6 ~u~ eb.. ,,~i,{ l ' A ~ r ~ - n ao. `°.yr,. ~ 3 y. y ~ i. - y A S~ L 6"~ F alp,... t ~ ~I z z' e s' ~ ~I a M - 1 r ~ ~ e ~F 1 ~t e t E w r w~ g _ ~U ~ ~ _ . _.:_b ~ y ; r o a s _ e ` .w ~ a~ t 4, e c 8. ~ a ~ h _ . , . _a.:. . , G x# ..u~ r ~R ~y,. f ~ 99 ti` - "~a~i~ ~ w. ,mom, aax 1 ~ ~ I ~'"ew=rd f ' enrc, r,~~ ~ ...~..-a.:a..~..~ ~ . ~gr.Aw~+..wxx» _ -wurvwfi~w _ ...,M, r _ ~ ...r.-.. w n ..w s :3~ ! ~ U ~R r i _ ya,. .n _ t=om-_~.~a~_,~~ _ ° ~ b k . ~ - ~ ~ - mE j. l r * _r , e, ~ ~ ~ z~,~ w ~ s ✓ i x.. d ~r2 ' ~ ~ J~ ~.rm'''_ vn= fY ~ f s z. _ _ _ r ~c i I n, 1 i ,.:,~,~...4.~,.. ~ _ . ~ _ , ~ ~ ~~_1 6 _ J t t, t ~ ~..w_ _ ~ f f i P  ~f~. b 3 ~.1 ' y _ ~ 1~~✓~ a v a. .N< l f ~a~ „ wx _ i d r°°` iLi k EE k rH,; 4 ,ws a ~o - - ~ s _ T. ~ m.., ro~~~~,.,. 4 . , _r 2 ~ ` U v..._ t a, a~ f a k r I € 'a oP/ /j v. 'h-+a e. p~.» t a 4 { } E i -S €r ~ ~ , ~ of ~ T.. ~ .e x f i 4 I } r'9ir - ~F Y }~~w F g R e ~n J t" t' dpi. . Fft, R 2 F ~ k i ~ a L~ Pt ' ~ ~ 4t 2 ° e ~^.J ~~,r Ate,„ e,_ r.~ ,r ~ s, R 3 9 i z i ` ~ . P & X4 ? m - 9 _ 6. fie"" „ 2 d _ ~ o~~ k' } ~ f i r~ A ~ i `~s. "b= ~ 7 r ~ ~ f p `ex tl 5 4 r k E f u. 4 i ~sxrh:, eww ~ ; P _2"t~4 - 9rMd8a'ktiFSe2¢+.5~s'6~63p'~iti-r+ nrh ~-rv-~.-..,.....,:.,... .A ~ are a t i R { , _ - x r J-4 t s ' NNW* - y ate:: _ a _ _ s s. W , ~.N ..A~, o. ~ a~,=a.m a. }d.:. -..~W~- ~ , ~ i~ 1`> s 4 1 - ~_6 r ~ , _ ~ R.., n..,... g. r:. { i y r* . ,m:,., ~ ~ f ~ ~ _  f ~ , P o.a~~~~= .r^` i e ........_..V........ 2 ~ :v, ~ ~ r ~ ~~,m ~ e ~ t Y r <.I 88 .z~- z R o 5 ~ . k A '.C . e... - $tr 1. ~h P i; f~: 1~~ _ 3 ~~~t F ~ - ~ ` n. If ~yYMU ~ `*M6 e. ` 'i i. ~ 1 ~ f~Y r t t ~,+P A ^ _ -+r _ L s ~t R ~ - s 3 t~, t ~ (r 3 i ff t' l y H o r ~ ~t ,r Pr;.mom ~ ~ F: ~ e~ a f 8 } } { p .w w +,o- S ~ ~ ' aF ~ - -.n f ~ a r t ~ is P i. I p S.. F.. ~ I 4 94. i ~ v... r-:. ~ , a-. f ` r ~ E } 1 ?4 ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ a ~ f t ~ { ~ ~ 3 1 ~ ~ J ~ .max Wf J ':o` F F ' i i j i f 7 r. e°. 1 {  F4 - rte... W_ JA 4 Ole j