HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-06-21
"'<S
Alliance .Consulting
Engineers &: Surveyors
S440WardRoad, Suite 240
Arvada, CO 80002
Phone: 720,898.0660
. Fax: 303.424.8134
W"IYW.adsengiiieers.com
June 2, 2007
Meredith Reckert
. Senior planner
City of Wheat Ridge .
... th'
7500 W. 29 Ave: .
WheatRidge, CO 80033~800 1
Ref. M 8. W Glass
11990 West 52nd Avenue
WheatRidge, CO
Drainage Improvements
Job #204-'013
DearMeredith:
Asrequested by th~ City staffandthe BoardofAdjustment,AI.:ln Wiedmc:tierhas
constru.cted the' landscape berm'in accord",nce with approved plan c:tS of June 1 ;
2007 at the proPElrtylocated at 11990 We~t52ndAvenue, Wheat Ridge, CO. .1
observed the excavation oftheswc:tleprior to. placement of landscaping rock.as
well as the final placement of the landscc:tperock. ltis myopinioothat the.berm
as currently inst",lIed will help mitigc:tte the increased storm runofffromthe
property as required by the City.
If yourequire any additional information, please (':ontactmeat the number and
address listed below.
'\\\\I\lllIlUl11l1lf, .... _ ,
\\\\ G.RE' Itlll.
Sincerelwt;~~~efteoG~q~:p",~, .
"."" 0(''l1 J. MA."<';.,'"
>.t"~ <>,,,,_V.,.. .-~ "'r"~'
!~./Jte/z;b7~~\
~~~ :'a:~
t,P' '<If
~ .. ~~
z < ":,, ..'~
.:'//,0: I....,u~oo.'$: ~
. ...... '.z QJ;,,1l.1..~,~,
. Andrew J.. aN~!i\iif,,,'~'." . .
Alliance Consulting Engineers and Surveyors
Cc: Alan Wiedmaier
file
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857
The City of
W"heat Ridge
May 23,2007
Alan Wiedmaier
1l990W. 52nd Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Alan:
Please be advised that the City of Wheat Ridge has approved the design for drainage
improvements on your property required pursuant to Case No. W A-06-21. See attached
stamped construction drawing.
Prior to commencing construction, a no-fee permit will be required to be issued to either
you or a Class 4 licensed contractor. In addition, you will need to arrange inspections
before, during and after the work with our public works department. Please contact Russ
Higgins at 303-235-2869 to discuss the required inspections.
If you have questions or need further clarification, feel free to contact me at 303-235-2848.
Sincerely,
Meredith Reckert, AICP
Senior Planner
C: WA-06-21
I
11990 W 52nd Avenue
DRAINAGE IMPR
20"
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING
APPROVED FOR:
JZl'DRAINAGE 0 SIDEWALK
o CURB & GUTTER 0 STREET
o MISCELLANEOUS 0 PLAT
COMMENT
~
-a..'; :tdt.. " .".'-.._
CIVIL ENGINEER ATE
SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS
//
30 0
~
15
I
ORIGINAL SCALE:
30
I
1"=30'
60
I
."
.",
VARIES - 6' MAX
6' MIN ON EAST SIDE
9' MIN ON SOUTH SIDE
, M
~ i. ~:" l.~
5 il:il'H'
Ii !I
" ii"l!
.. ij':i
\Ii !,;.,
)[i,':1
/li'l
'-- Ii , !
Q,v'
LANDSCAPE B~U DETAIL
NOTIRCA TION TO CITY FOR
INSPECTION PRIOR J~ CONSlRUCTION
\\\\\\111111111111/
:S-~\~~O REG/~/II/,;I
~ <\.r- 00,,00000 u J' 0
$! <:;;:,""",c ,~\ J if0o~ ~ ~
~......... <".,.'1' oQ1"~
:0 c:::,v,os:,~" 0'1< ',:<,,~
~ ~i::t ~/2"(07 "-'p~C> ~
~ 31:;'1?3 ;r::c~
" ~.- "~''--If
"
"
MINIMIZE SOIL
DISlURBANCE (I.E.
COMPACTION)TO
ALLOW FOR FOR
MAXIMUM WATER
PERCOLATION.
SCALE VERIFlCA TlON "PLANNING' ENGINEERING' CONSTRUCTION MANAIlEMEIIT"
~PROJECTMMIAG'MENT.SURVEYlNG'
BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
F NOT ONE INCH ON nos SHEET
.......,. SCAl!S _v All' C I .
lance onsu tmg
"'1='aoo:m~8r" Engineers" Surveyors
.. 303-534-6700 -= 5440 WARO ROAD, SUITE 240' ARVADA, CO 8OD02
... ~ fIf.................... utHII. PH. (720) 898-0660 * FAX (303) 424-8134
M & W CLASS
DRA'IlING NO.
204013-dralnage
DAm
5/11/07
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
ALAN W1EDMAIER
SCALE:
1" = 30'
,f!Ec'l) Slb/" 7
~ ""'"'"'-- .#I,\~
---..~~,. .;
" .....'..
at)' ofWhei'lt Ridge
Department Di Public \Yorks
MEMORANDUM
TO: Russ Higgins, Field Services Supervisor
FROM: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer
DATE: May 23, Z007
SUBJECT: M & W Glass, 11900 W. 5Znd Avenue
The M & W Glass Company located at 11900 W. 5Znd Avenue has been in violation of the City Code for
numerous years. The owner is now wanting to sell the property but has found out that due to the property not
being in conformance with City Code he had to apply for a variance to in essence make it "legal" again so
the mortgage company will supply his buyer with the money to acquire the property.
So Mr. Alan Wiedmaier, the owner of M & W Glass, went before the City of Wheat Ridge Board of
Adjustment to ask for the pavement (hard surface) variance he needs to complete the sale. The BOA granted
the variance with a stipulation that the site drainage be addressed. Currently the runoff from this site adds
some flow to the adjoining property (onto their dirt driveway) causing them to have to perform minor re-
grading every so often - basically being a maintenance nuisance.
I have been in contact with the engineer from Alliance Development Services, Andrew Marner, P.E. to
address the runoff issue. After I visited the site and discussed the situation with Mr. Marner, we came up
with the attached Drainage Improvement Plan. The owner wishes to sell this property fairly soon so I would
expect you to be contacted for an inspection of this before, during and subsequent to the work being
performed (especially since it was ordered by the BOA).
Let me know if we need to discuss this further.
To Russ - M&W Glass (11900 W52nd) (5-23-07).doc
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
Telephone 303/235-2846
FAX 303/235-2857
The City of
Wheat
Ridge
May 22, 2007
Alan Wiedrnaier
Il481 W. 45th PI.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Mr. Wiedrnaier:
RE: Case No. WA-06-21
Please be advised that at its meeting of April 26, 2007, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your
request for a variance to Section 26-50I.D.1 (Parking Lot Paving) for property zoned Industrial and
located at 11990 West 52nd Avenue for the following reasons:
1. There will be no negative impact on the character of the area.
2. Granting of the paving variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare.
3. Granting of the paving variance would not impact the adequate supply oflight and air to
adjacent properties and would not increase the change of fire or endanger the public safety.
4. In accordance with the goals and policies of the Northwest Area Sub-area Plan, there could be
a long-term negative impact on the neighborhood due to investment in this property
discouraging redevelopment.
5. Given the current use, there is no apparent public benefit in increasing the areas of impervious
paving on this property. Installation of further impervious surface paving would increase the
need for channelization of storm runoff and storm runoff retention on the property. Therefore,
installation of further impervious surface paving would aggravate storm runoff problem from
this small property.
6. Currently, a significant amount of water runoff from the concrete driveway is channeled into a
cistern thus causing some significant mitigation of the storm runoff potential.
With the following condition:
1. Applicant will have built channelization for storm water runoff as designed and located by a
professional registered engineer and as approved as to both by the Wheat Ridge Director of
Public Works so as not to increase the negative effects of the historic runoffpattern.
Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the
Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, April 26, 2007. Staff is expecting
an expedited resolution to drainage resulting in compliance with condition of approval.
Improvements should be completed by July I, 2007.
Alan Wiedrnaier
Page 2
May 22, 2007
Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy Field
Administrative Assistant
Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution
Draft of Minutes
cc: WA-06-21 (case file)
Building File
\\srv-ci-eng-OO 1 \users\ldield\Kathy\BOA \CORRESP\2007\wa0621 approval(rehearing).wpd
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
(C(Q)rv
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado, on the 26th day of April, 2007.
CASE NO: W A-06-2I
APPLICANT'S NAME: Alan Wiedmaier
LOCATION: 11990 West 52nd Avenue
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. W A-06-21 is an appeal to this Board
from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition
that there WERE NO protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose ofthe regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
W A-06-21 be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A variance to Section 26-501.D.1 (parking Lot Paving) for property
zoned Industrial.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. There will be no negative impact on the character of the area.
2. Granting of the paving variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare.
3. Granting of the paving variance would not impact the adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent properties and would not increase the change of fire or endanger the public
safety.
4. In accordance with the goals and policies ofthe Northwest Area Sub-area Plan, there
could be a long-term negative impact on the neighborhood due to investment in this
property discouraging redevelopment.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution W A-06-21
Page two (2)
5. Given the current use, there is no apparent public benefit in increasing the areas of
impervious paving on this property. Installation of further impervious surface paving
would increase the need for channelization of storm runoff and storm runoff retention on
the property. Therefore, installation of further impervious surface paving would
aggravate storm runoff problem from this small property.
6. Currently, a significant amount of water runoff from the concrete driveway is channeled
into a cistem thus causing some significant mitigation of the storm runoff potentiaL
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. Applicant will have built channelization for storm water runoff as designed and located
by a professional registered engineer and as approved as to both by the Wheat Ridge
Director of Public Works so as not to increase the negative effects of the historic runoff
pattern.
NO:
ABBOTT, BELL, BLAIR, BUCKNAM, HOVLAND, LINKER
PAGE
HOWARD
VOTE:
YES:
DISPOSITION: A variance to Section 26-501.D.1 (parking Lot Paving) for property zoned
Industrial and located at 11990 West 52nd Avenue was APPROVED.
ADOPTED and made effective this 26th day of April. 2007.
4~~
Robert Blair, Chair
Board of Adjustment
~
Ann Lazzeri, Secret
Board of Adjustment
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Minutes of Meeting
April 26, 2007
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Whet Ridge Board of Adjustment was called to order
by Chair BLAIR at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal
Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge,
f; A.
Meredith Reckert introduced and welcomed Betty Jo
new members ofthe Board of Adjustment.
2. ROLL CALL
Board Members Present:
eckert, Senior Planner
ecretary
3.
4.
-06-21: An application filed by Alan Wiedmaier for
variance to Section 26-501.D.l(parking Lot Paving) for
ed Industrial and located at 11990 West 52nd Avenue
This case wa presented by Meredith Reckert. She entered all pertinent
documents into the record and advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the
case. She reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. This case is an
appeal from a two-part request relating to parking lot paving and landscaping. At
the January 25,2007 meeting, the request for a landscaping variance was
approved and the paving request was denied. New evidence has been submitted
by the applicant for this hearing. Staff recommended approval for reasons
outlined in the staff report. If the case is approved, a design for a swale on the
adjacent property to accommodate runoff from the existing site will be required as
Board of Adjustment Minutes
April 26, 2007
-1-
recommended by the consulting engineer and reviewed by the Department of
Public Works.
Board Member BELL asked if the subject property and the adjacent property
were nnder the same ownership. Ms. Reckert stated that the adjacent property is
under a different ownership and therefore the applicant and his engineer would
have to work with that owner to obtain an easement.
In response to questions from Board Member HOWARD, Ms. Reckert explained
that the property was zoned industrial when the structures .~ere built. Although
the zoning was industrial, the structure was used as resi""tVaLo. There is now a
glass business in the building. She also explained th . nage from this property
goes into the Columbine Basin flowing from s utheast.
Alan Wiedmaier
Andrew Marner, Alliance Consulting
Mr. Wiedmaier, the applicant, and Mr
sworn in by chair BLAIR. Mr. Marner st
engineer with the State of Colorado
In response to a question from
swale approximately ten feet
drainage from the applicant's pro
flood event.
as in favor of the gravel drive because it
te into e soil. She asked if there had been any
. g runoff in order to use the water for landscaping.
all scale of the site precludes using runofffor
Mr. Wi
water from
the ground.
that there is a cistern behind the house and most of the
y drains into it. The water then filters out from the cistern into
In response to a question from Board Member HOWARD, Meredith Reckert
stated that the gravel portion ofthe driveway contairis an adequate amount of
gravel.
Board Member ABBOTT asked why it is necessary for the swale to be on the
neighbor's property. Mr. Marner explained that it is necessary to have a swale to
safely pass run-off water from the applicant's property across the neighbor's
Board of Adjustment Minutes
April 26, 2007
-2-
property. The water would flow diagonally across the property to the southeast
and would be shallow and slow.
Chair BLAIR asked if anyone else wished to address this matter. There was no
response.
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member
BELL, the following resolution was stated:
Now, therefore, be it resolved t
be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an a
and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Case No. W A-.
Board from the decision of an administrative'
Whereas, the property has been poste
in recognition that there were no prQ,.
~gk
.!~f45"'f>
There 've impaJif on the character of the area.
ting 0 ce would not be detrimental to the
!far
the +variance would not impact the adequate
t an to adjacent properties and would not increase
fire r endanger the public safety.
4. with the goals and policies of the Northwest Area Sub-
'&~, ere could be a long-term negative impact on the
''God due to investment in this property discouraging
redev = pment.
5. Givell the current use, there is no apparent public benefit in
increasing the areas of impervious paving on this property.
Installation of further impervious surface paving would increase the
need for channelization of storm runoff and storm runoff retention on
the property. Therefore, installation offurther impervious surface
paving would aggravate storm runoff problem from this small
property.
Board of Adjustment Minutes
April 26, 2007
-3-
6. Currently, a significant amount of water runofffrom the concrete
driveway is channeled into a cistern thus causing some significant
mitigation of the storm runoff potential.
With the following condition:
1. Applicant will have built channelization for storm water runoff as
designed and located by a professional registered engineer and as
approved as to both by the Wheat Ridge Director of Public Works so
as not to increase the negative effects of the hist runoff pattern.
.k
L.
7.
The motion carried 7-1 with Board Member HO
5.
CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
There were no other cases to be heard by th
closed the public hearing portion of the
6.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business to come before tn
NEW BUSINESS
A. Approval of Minutes -
. ng amendments to minutes of
tence e last paragraph should be amended to
read: "Board Member ABBOTT
nly uruque thing about the subject sign is that it
. at what time the Rotary Club meets."
e first sentence of the third paragraph should be replaced
. g sentence: "Board Member ABBOTT asked Mr.
ther than permission from the City as the property
unique about this situation to allow more than one sign
nization."
It was moved by Board Member PAGE and seconded by Board
Member HOVLAND to approve the minutes of March 22, 2007 as
amended by Board Member ABBOTT. The motion passed 6-0 with
Board Members PAGE and BUCKNAM abstaining.
Board Member ABBOTT asked if any action had been taken by the
Rotary Club regarding the condition placed on the motion that stated:
"The Rotary Club will approach City Council to consider modifying this
Board of Adjustment Minutes
April 26, 2007
-4-
Page I of I
Meredith Reckert
From: Meredith Reckert
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 3:48 PM
To: 'kshutto@ci.wheatridge.co.us'; Christine Ruote
Subject: C.O.
Hi guys-
I am working on finalizing the improvements to 11990 W. 52nd Avenue which Chad and I were working with on
commercializing the property. I know they took out a permit for some interior work but didn't know if a C.O. has
been issued. I think we need to issue a C.O. cUZ they are still shown as "residential" in the jeffco assessor's
records. Let me know what you have on file.
Thanks-
M
Meredith Reckert, AICP
Senior Planner
Wheat Ridge Community Development Department
Telephone: 303.235.2848
FAX: 303.235.2857
5/8/2007
~
; 't_.
<<;;J,~ ,
L:]' C~=:::::d
~
Q
~,
~..U)
"" . .
~ ,-- ,
~c=;~c;==~=:.=~;
c....,,,""'",
~.~"~'."""hc.0..,
~w.,_,._'>~. i
~.:::::.
.:J
"
~'~~."."'~".
," --"'b,,>;,.,., i
~", ,
~...~
.=~"
~!~.~
~~ .....q~
~
~.....~..........'.
. ~.,,=*'."'"'-~'"'"
--,,, ~. ,
Ul
'"0
'--
co
'"0
C
co
.j...J
Ul
0'1
Q) C
.-
:J >
C co
~ Cl..
0
.j...J
u Q)
c
N U
1..0 C
. CO
:5: ';::
CO
0 >
Q) CO
Q) '--
..-t .e
..-t
.j...J
Ul
Q)
:J
cr
~
<(
"
o
-l-' 0
C N
(]) ~
E \0
t; N
.2, .;::
~ ~
'0 >-
ro
"E "Sl
ro .....
o ::l
c:l ..c
I-
cu
U
l.....
0)
E
E
0
u
cu
c
0
:p
'"'0
'"'0
(J) cu
l.....
..., c E
3:
U) .
~ 0 T"""l
.
::s E 0
.
0) T"""l
~ ..c 0
+J I..t)
I
(J) \.0
C N
+J C
(/) .
0) 0 (J)
:J :p C
c:r U >
0) 0) CU
l..... CJ) 0..
(/) 0 +J
+J 0
+J
C 0)-
CU U (J)
U C C
CU .-
0.. ._~
l..... l.....
0.. CU CU
<( > 0..
~'3B1M- '03ffii\.ta/M-3:)i.i "
P._~ _:)il'ln-N1'v'H'.9 - -.........------
o_-.:>;~- ;O"'l'13M
"
;-,~.
'11'5"1
31:!IM 0381:!\;i'S/.ii\ 30ft]
)INn NWJ{O', ,f}
,;
b.
~N\j'H1:!3AO
,0'6.
33lli snonOl::l:m --\lj\flG :c; .
~
o
"
l'WHd~V
~NIGlIf)8/a3HS lV13V'l
AelOlS Z
:u HSVCll H~)'If;1 ,9 X ON01-,H
OVo;l
H vi ?'
. ~.r3l:13N0:I q
-'H IA'/ d
F~d"'JSf'''''''r
Cv!P\>\'p
(V\ -(l-?J
;;If\-+I <%1"' "Z G
z
~al:bVl108
o
o
d
o
"
,Y'''~
n
.;
,6'6-
-is
fTJ
;O'S2: f?"
,c<;a
nNIGllne 35\11:1015
t)~VH1:!3IIO
~
o
"
.;ll~l:ldS;V" ~
~
'O'LZ
. J;~~ . O'S
N
~.
,q
3^IMOj;)Ni>RI)fd ,3A1;lw'
iJ
p
'"
_,.,:~_:,-' _ ~::~:~t "l7\f' .
:--~>r '''{-liL~Q_ N6U;Vf)I~.m.,
~
,""",?';-><l>'4Y~-~
~
,0fQt"j;rb;o~:a~N ,.
3nN3!\V ONZ<;
v'or
O~
C~
::j0
OZ
ro
~,
<,
o
00
~-
~"
o~
o
o
~
o
"
,vT
,n:
,S"?;'
.y""
?H
~:3JON
"-z ~.
.
,"
" --~~.
,
.
"
" ~~.
.
~fi'~'"
1lJfi0.-:"
"
"""'.......0lJ._
"~" ,-
,
.Ll\lHdSV
"
'.
"
;6J"
,
'I
,
z
o
o
d
o
-is
fTJ
"
Ul
'-J
o
o
3'3N3.:! 30VKl01S
N3QOOM .9
~
1
,6v:S
M ~NINIV13C1 301M- "Z\
"
,
,
"
'.
01,
'q)
",
"
C
ta
-
0-
ta
cu
l-
ta
.c
~
U)
.....
U)
cu
==
.c
.....
I-
o
Z
e
o
.-
~
cu
N
.-
-
CU
~
.-
>
Q)
~
'"0
o
o
..c
~
o
..0
..c
en
.-
Q)
Z
Q)
..c
~
4-
o
>-
~en
-Q)
~~
(J) CU
Q) ~
~(j)
.
~
~
..0
en
e
.-
e
o
N
~
o
(J) Q)
Q) ~
(J) ~
~~
en~
e4-
.- ~
t)J2
.-
X Q)
:!:: Q) U
(J) Q) e
e en CU
~ e:g
~ CU ~
~..cen
J2 U (J)
~Q)
(J) e '"0
$ (J).-
o Q) >
- 0 0
<(00.
~
e
Q)
E
0..
o
-
Q)
>
Q)
'"0
'"0
Q)
~
e
Q)
.-
~
o
. .
~
~
..o(J)
Q)~
~ e
e Q)
.- E
~~
e (J)
o Q)
U>_
o e
4-'-- .C
- ~
(J)
~
'"0
e
.......
'"OCU
Q):,p
ene
CU CU
~ ~
~ (J)
0..0
U ~
e (J)
Q) Q)
(J)en
Q) CU
(J) ~
~ ~
en8
e e
:,pQ)
(J)
.- ~
X 0
UJ e
.
CU
(J)
CU
e
$
o
..c
(J)
>-
~
~
Q)
0..
o
~
a..
.
17 ~!q!4X3
~-ocl:j-o~
;:l P "Uj v g ~
;:l<'!lpS~-o
i-L-<SvP-,vp
\ ;:l ~ 0 bDN
(\$ .....-( ,..... <0 -d lr)
,...,.....'""0""""'"
'-'VbD>:-'J-o
~~:E6~~
1$
p
o
.~
'-'
u
V
p
P
o
U
P
<'!l
,~
'-<
'-'
VJ
0)
-0
V
0..
Vl P
;:l 0
~ "0
J8~
;:l
<'!l U
V '-<
'-< "~
~U
p
o
"~
'-'
<'!l
'-'
(fJ
p
o
"~
'-'
U
V
P
p
o
U
V
;:l
p
<)
~
'fl
o
tn
4-
Q)
:::I
=:
Q)
;;.-
<
1 c
-~ .~
~ '(ii" ;J
,r;; i;:. 'a -:j ~ .g
- '" <=l '~_' Ii ~ i::
~ '~,' ~ :: . c. ~ q
...c ]= 0 ::l. <> ....v
.K .'~.~]'1d ~,~]]t~~
...>......"::lwc r:.:.<....'" <Ii'::" "'-
g, fo~l~:';;; ..'~..~."~' j..g.,.[, g g
~'.'';.::;l~:EL~..~ ~ -c:tj.5-o'EE
'~~~'€~~,~l:~8~ l-~'-~
-bl~2U)-:?-3.~.tJ v:: 0 '.:J.'i3:' !f-~
ZJ:90:::':Jm( .JU..,-S .. iIIiI ilit' 'T'
'"
c
N
tn
~
...-<
<'!l
,~
w
P
V
'-'
o
0..
~ V
1--<-0
-0 VJ ...-< ~&1
w V 1) <'!l w J8
.~ w ...-< <) W P VJ Vl p
Vl P 0 cD <'!l '-< VJ ] OJ
P V ~ 0 p u OJ OJ '-<~
"~
<'!l "~ ,..q <'!l -0 '-' u '-< '-<
'-< '-< 0 u '-< IX: u 0 ;:l <;<j
I--< 0 U (fJ 0 p I.!W ~ 0.. Uo..
~
C-
'"
:;;
'"
'"
:::>
"0
"
'"
-'
"0
l!!
~
'a;
is.
~
l!!
::l
'"
u:
c
o
1-
...,
U
m
~
U)
m
U
I..
o
I-
I..
0.
01
C
:p
0)
0)
~
<(
o
co
I"'--
o
o
N
01
C
:p
C
(/) 01 eu
0) C 0..
U > +J
C 6 C
eu _ 0
l..... 0 J::
~ ~ C
0) .-
O1..c'"'O
,c +J 0)
~:5t:
0.. '$ eu
'"'0 0..
C '"'0 0)
eu ~.o
O1O(/)
C 0.. .0
0.. 0.. 2
eu eu..c
~ (/) (/)
'"'0 eu C
C $ 0
eu =
0) eu
'"'O~O1
2 eu 0)
(/) .- >
0) ro q::
:J > I..t)
c:r 01 T"""l
~ C
+J '0.. C
~ r9 ,0
U (/):!::::
'"'0 '"'0
0.. C C '"'0
o..euOO)
<( .....J u.o
'"'0
0)
~
..c
u
..c
$
eu
>
o
l.....
0..
0..
eu
l.....
E
C
o
:p
o
E
"-" ~
'"'00)
O)+J
._ 0
C >
~c
(/) l.....
eu ,!2-
$ eu
0) E
u l.....
C 0)
euo..
'C :J
eu (/)
>+J
(10)
C 0)
'> E
&.8
.
01
C .
'> a3
eu q::
0.. :p
C 0
o . C
01 '"'0 '"'0
C 2 C
l..... C eu
eueu'"'O
0) l..... 0)
..c01+J
~ (/) ~
0..
(/)01
+JC
(/) 'C
0) eu
:J 0)
O"..c
0) 0)
l.....o:::
+J
C .
eu 0)
u u
C
0.. 0) l.....
0.. '"'0 eu
<( '> 0)
O)..c
.. 0)
I"'-- $ l.....
00)1"'--
Oco
N 0
.....c N
N:!::::
N$
..c -
u .eu
l..... C
eu 0)
~'"'O
.
...
'"'0
0)
..c
(/)
.0
:J
0..
01
C
...
~
N
.-
l.....
0..
<(
.
...
I..t)
N
>
l.....
eu
:J
C
eu
I'J
. . .
~
u
c
~
-c
.-
>
~
~
~
z
>-
..0
"'0
Q)
1-
co
Q.
Q) 1-
1-
Q.~
fJ) C
C .-
00"1
.- C
:t=Q)
"'0 _
C CO
o C
u 0
.-
0"IfJ)
C fJ)
.- Q)
-1-1 4-
.- 0
X 1-
Q)Q.
4-
0"'0
fJ) ~
.- Q)
fJ)-I-I
>-fJ)
CO .-
CO"I
<( ~
.
Q)
CO
S
fJ)
S Z" S
0fJ)a...
_ CO >-
COQ)..o
..cQ)
fJ)..c ..c
~ -1-1 :t=
-1-1 0 S
U -1-1 ~
CO........... '-'
Q.>-Q)
E 1: t:
.- Q) :J
Q. U
CO 0 C
E 1- 0
Q. u
C
. - -1-1 "'0
E C C
fJ) ~ CO
.- CO "'0
.1""""\ Q)
~ "'0 S
Q) CO Q)
..c C .-
-1-1 0 5i
fJ) "'0 1-
Q) Q) fJ)
"'0 -1-1 .-
:J CO fJ)
U U >-
cOco
0- C
U.fJ) <(
.
>-
..0
"'0
Q)
"'0
C
Q)
E
E
o
u
Q)
1-
fJ)
CO
Q)
~S
fJ)a...
1- >-
~..o
C S
. 0"1 Q)
fJ) .-
Q) >
"'O~
CO "'0
Q) C
1- CO
.-
:J 1-
o-Q)
Q) Q)
1- C
.-
0"1
.- C
S Q)
. .
0)
u
c
cu
..c 0
u +J
0) 0)
. (/) :J
0) cu '"'0 .
l..... 0) +J
~ l..... cu C
u 0) 0)
0) C l..... E
m $ +J cu 0..
1- U 0 0) 0
l- e ..c -
+J 0)
eu . ..0 '"'0 o >
co :J :J +JO)
-1--1 0) 0.. 0 '"'0
l..... +J 0)
1- cu 0 $ u l.....
I- +J cu
4- 0)
U 0 '"'0 0..
cu C . E 01
l..... +J cu
0) c cu C ,- l.....
eu +J 0) ,: 0) 0) :J
U E cu4- > 0
U co cu .- U
l..... 'i:: '"'O(/)+J(/)
co +J cu ,-
C ..c 0) c U 01 '"'0
U '"'0 CU:.= 0)
m c 0) +J..o c '"'0
..c :J E :J
1- 0 ..0 010.. 0
I- +J +J ,- l..... U
- l.....
U 0 +J 0) 2..c
m co
0.. C U 01 U
> E '"'0 cu C 01 .-
o..cu c..c
:J E'"'O o $
0) 0 .- c cut:
> $ +J 0)
:p 0) 0 l..... 0) 0)
cu c 0 ..0 E
01 U
0) C '"'0 0) '"'Ot)
C cu l.....
:J ,- -0)
l..... 04- :J >
0 cu $0 8c
z >
. . . .
.
l..... 0)
O)~
0) (/)
,c 01
O1C
C c:p
0) (/)
0 >'x
..00)
.- '"'0 E .
....,
0)0$
ta Cl.....Q..
014-
-C ,- 4- >
(/)4-..0
C 0) 0
'"'0 I '"'0
GJ 0)50)
..ol.....6
E C ~O)l.....
0 +J 0..
:p l.....cuo..
E '"'0 0) '"'0 cu
g-0'"'O
C
0 l..... E C
0 u o..Ecu
U 01 +JO'"'O
C C U 0)
GJ $ 0) U $
~cuO)
I- 0 '.........0 ,-
'"'O+J>
t: E cu '"'0 ~
0) 0) 0) 0)
ta ..c ..cU..o
+J +J :J
...., ..c C l..... C
+J o +J 01
(J) (/) .-
$ 0) C (/)
-00)
cu CUu'"'O
> $ '"'0 0)
0 (/)c..c
l..... <(cuf-
0..
0..
<( .
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING:
April 26, 2007
CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert
CASE NO. & NAME: Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedrnaier
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a variances for commercial paving in an I zone district
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
11990 W. 52nd Avenue
NAME OF OWNER(S):
Alan Wiedmaier
APPROXIMATE AREA:
11,793 square feet
PRESENT ZONING:
Light Industrial (1)
PRESENT LAND USE:
glass shop office and warehouse
ENTER INTO THE RECORD:
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
(X) CASE FILE AND PACKET MATERIALS
(X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION
Site
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
1
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been
met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST !EXISTING CONDITIONS
The property in question is located at I 1990 W. 52nd Avenue and is zoned Light Industrial (I).
Current use of the property is as a commercial glass business office and shop area. This case is being
heard on appeal from a two-part request relating to parking lot paving and landscaping. At the January
25, 2007 meeting the request for landscaping variance was approved; the paving request was denied.
Discussion regarding the January meeting is under Section IV of this report.
Although the property has Light Industrial zoning, it was originally developed residentially prior to the
incorporation ofthe City. The property contains 11,793 square feet ofland area and has the original
house on it which is approximately 800 square feet in size. According to the Jefferson County Assessor
information, the house was built in 1948. In 1999, the applicant purchased the property. A large garage
with 1800 s.f. of footprint was constructed in 2001. At the time of permitting, the property owner
indicated that it was a garage accessory to the house where he was residing and would be for his own
personal use. (Exhibit I, Survey/Site Plan)
In 2003, the applicant met with the Community Development department to discuss the requirements
needed to operate a glass business on his property. He was informed that he needed to apply for a
building permit to bring the property up to commercial standards with required parking and paving,
commercial landscaping and interior structure modifications. To this date, a permit for this
renovation/improvement has never been approved or issued. Code enforcement action has been pursued
several times with no resolution to the situation. The business has now sold with the property sale
pending. The former owner is attempting to legitimize the existing situation through the variance
process as part of the purchase contract.
The City of Wheat Ridge has many existing homes along major corridors zoned commercially or
industrially, most of which were built prior to incorporation. As the City of Wheat Ridge has continued
to develop and commercialize, many once-residential streets have now become commercial collector
and arterials. Structures and properties originally developed as homes have become undesirable for
residential use as traffic on these streets has intensified. The existing commercial zone districts allow
existing single family homes to remain in perpetuity, however no new freestanding residential units are
permitted.
Many of the residential properties with commercial zoning located on the arterials and collector streets
have been converted to commercial businesses. When a property is converted from residential to
commercial, it must be in conformance with all codes and regulations prior to being considered a legal
conversion. These requirements include, but may not be limited to, compliance by the structure with
applicable building and fire codes, installation of commercial paving and striping based on an approved
drainage report and installation of commercial landscaping.
The applicant's variance request relates to commercial paving requirements in order to legitimize the use
of the property for a commercial glass operation.
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
2
Section 26.-501.D.1. requires all uses other than single and two family residential to have hard surfaced
paving by concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or other hard materials. In this case portions of the parking
and drive area are covered in asphalt or concrete. Other portions are graveled. The applicant wishes to
retain the graveled areas "as is".
The current circulation pattern on the property allows for entry to the site from a curb cut located
adjacent to the western property line. Proceeding straight in, parking is located on the west side ofthe
office which is paved in concrete. Proceeding across the front of the property leads to the east side of
the office. Continuing south leads toward the warehouse area. This area of the property is the graveled
portion. There is adequate parking on the site given the building sizes (7 total parking spaces with one
handicapped space).
If the parking lot is required to be paved, Public Works will require submission of a drainage plan and
report meeting today's standards and will likely require a large detention pond at the southeast comer of
the property. The property currently slopes from northwest to southeast. Drainage on the property
follows this historic flow pattern.
II. ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND AREA CONDITIONS
The property is abutted on the east, west and south by property zoned I, Light Industrial.
Corresponding development includes vacant property to the east and south which is part of a
larger parcel consisting of9.5 acres used for RV storage. (Exhibit 2, Aerial photo with zoning)
Farther to the east on W. 52nd Avenue is a single family residence and alpaca farm. Under that
same ownership to the south and west is Hance Subdivision which is zoned R-l and platted as
single family lots. This subdivision has not been developed to date. (Exhibit 3, Hance
Subdivision Plat)
Abutting the property on the west is a single family home zoned I which appears as if it is still
used residentially. Farther to the west on the south side of 52nd Avenue is an animal
crematorium. Continuing west towards Ward Road on the south side of 52nd Avenue is
commercial property under a variety of ownership used as office/warehouse, retail, commercial
parking and gasoline sales.
Across the street is property located in the City of Arvada, zoned residentially. Traveling west
on Ward Road, the residential units transition to commercial uses.
III. NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN
In 2004, the City initiated a study on the state of the City in an effort to identify issues facing the
community. "Repositioning Wheat Ridge: Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy" focuses on
population and household trends, jobs, housing market and commercial inventory. The goal was
to restore Wheat Ridge to a community of choice for homeowners and businesses. One of the
recommendations was for the City to undertake subarea planning to focus on unique
opportunities and challenges facing certain areas in the City. The northwest subarea with
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
3
boundaries generally of 52nd Avenue on the north, Simms and Tabor Streets to the east, I-70 on
the south and Ward Road to the west was one of these targeted areas.
This subarea plan completed in 2006 was considered a priority since it is the location of the
proposed RTD Gold Line transit station. The potential for a light rail station brings opportunities
for development and redevelopment for transit oriented land uses. Transit-oriented land use
typically produces a mix of uses including retail, office and residential that is in close proximity
to convenient transit. It is oriented to the pedestrian rather than the private automobile and
encourages higher density land uses.
The Northwest Subarea is identified as having the potential to become a mixed use "village"
with a slightly urban character near the transit station in the vicinity of 50th and Ward,
transitioning to more suburban as it extends to the north and east. The plan does not change
existing allowable uses or zoning but provides broad guidance regarding future land use
decisions in the area. The preferred land use map designates the subject property as "light
industrial". (Exhibit 4, Preferred land use map)
The light industrial designation is defmed as having permitted uses that are commercial and light
industrial in nature. Buildings should be designed as timeless transitional buildings which
enhance the pedestrian environment so that the structure can transition from commercial use to
commercial use (such as a retail facility to a restaurant use). The ground floor should have 60%
transparency and the buildings should be pushed to the streets with a 0' setback. Parking should
be located in the rear.
The plan indicates that since the light rail development is several years away; existing businesses
must be allowed to operate and expand but must not preclude the ultimate development
objectives. More specifically that "existing buildings and uses are encouraged to continue" and
that "new buildings and improvements that are not consistent with the... plan... should be of a
temporary nature such that they can be amortized and removed with modest expense at such time
that the planned roads and other infrastructure are developed."
There are implications for road connections including the widening of W. 52nd A venue with a
pedestrian path and a north-south street connection which could impact the property and any
substantial improvements.
IV. PRIOR BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION
The Board of Adjustment reviewed the applicant's requests for a both landscaping and paving variances
on January 25, 2007.
The following landscaping variances were being considered:
. A variance to Section 26-502.D.3.c.1. (20 % commercial landscaped coverage requirement)
. A variance to Section 26-502.C.l. (Maximum of 35% non-living landscaping)
. A variance to Section 26-502.C.3.a. (Commercial street tree requirement)
. A variance to Section 26-502.C.3.b. (Additional trees and shrubs required)
Board of Adjustment
Case No. WA-06-21/Wiedmaier
4
A motion was made to approve the landscape variances for the following reasons:
1. There will be no negative impact on the character of the area.
2. There are unique circumstances as an existing landscape buffer is located in the 52nd Avenue
right-of-way.
3. Granting of the landscape variance would not impact the adequate supply oflight or air to
adjacent properties and would not increase the chance of fire or endanger the public safety.
4. Variances will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties or
improvements in the neighborhood.
5. Related to the subarea plans, there could be a long term negative impact on the neighborhood
due to the substantial investment in the property discouraging future redevelopment under the
Northwest Subarea Plan.
With the following condition:
The property owner will plant fifteen five-gallon sized low growing coniferous shrubs in the planted
area in the front of the property. This is to be completed by March 31, 2007.
A visual inspection of the property performed on April 1 0, 2007 confirms that the plantings have
occurred and are consistent with the Board's condition of approval for the landscape variance.
A motion was made to approve the paving variance; however, the motion failed to pass as a super
majority vote of five affirmative votes was not received. (Exhibit 5, January 25,2007 minutes)
The applicant approached the Board on March 22, 2007, and was granted a rehearing on the paving
portion of the request. Submitted as new evidence is a drainage analysis performed by registered
professional engineer. (Exhibit 6, analysis of existing conditions). The City of Wheat Ridge drainage
review engineer has reviewed the analysis and performed a site visit and concurs with the findings
(Exhibit 9, Dave Brossman memo)
V. VARIANCE CRITERIA
The applicant is requesting a variance to Section 26.-50I.D.1. for commercial paving
requirements.
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district
in which it is located?
If the paving is required, the property owner will have to install hard surfacing which will
require the submission of a drainage plan and report including a water quality basin.
Given the small size of the property, it is questionable whether this could be
accommodated on site. The applicant has submitted drainage information which indicates
Board of Adjustment
Case No. WA-06-21IWiedmaier
5
that nnder the existing conditions, there is minimal impact to the property to the south
and east.
2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
If the paving variance is granted, it would not impact the essential character of the area.
There are numerous commercial properties in the area which have graveled or recycled
asphalt parking and drive areas.
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the
owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the
regulations were carried out?
The lot in question has a typical rectangular shape and slopes from northwest to
southeast. If the entire lot is paved, accommodation of the required drainage facilities is
questionable. According to the adjacent property owner, the improvements installed by
the applicant over the past five years have already impacted his property. While he does
not want additional paving on the property which will exacerbate the drainage concerns,
he would like to have some accommodation ofthe existing situation to lessen the impact
to his property. The drainage impact analysis submitted by the applicant indicates there
is minimal impact. The City of Wheat Ridge drainage review engineer concurs with this
finding.
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having
an interest in the property?
The hardship has been created by the property owner who started using the property
commercially without completing the required commercial site and building
improvements.
5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is
located, by, among other things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or
increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially
diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood?
Granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare. The paving
variance would not impact the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
would not increase the chance of fire or endanger the public safety.
There could be a negative impact on the neighborhood if the variance is not granted as
installation of additional improvements in the property could discourage the assemblage
of adjacent parcels for future redevelopment. It is clearly stated in the Northwest Subarea
Board of Adjustment
Case No. WA-06-21/Wiedmaier2
6
Plan that interim uses without substantial monetary investment should be encouraged to
facilitate future redevelopment.
6. If criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished
from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the
variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
The requested paving variance would result in an individual benefit for the property and
would not result in the accommodation of a person with disabilities. There may be a
benefit to the neighborhood and the community if the property were assembled with
adjacent parcels and redeveloped.
VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Upon review of the request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the
commercial paving variance request. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following
reasons:
1.
2.
3.
4.
There will be no negative impact on the character ofthe area.
Granting ofthe paving variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare.
Granting of the paving variance would not impact the adequate supply of light and
air to adjacent properties and would not increase the chance of fire or endanger the
public safety.
There could be a long-term negative impact on the neighborhood due to investment
in the property discouraging redevelopment.
With the following conditions:
I. The existing parking areas be striped as laid out by Staff on Exhibit 1 including the
handicapped loading space with freestanding sign.
2. The existing shed, vehicles and all other outside materials stored in the graveled
"landscaped "areas along the eastern property line and at the south end of the property
must be removed.
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
7
w
=:;)S!
.z .to
'"
.w,w
>'10
<{g
tfl
en
o .re
zz
C"'-l
l.D
'."-';1:
.
. .
.
.
'j
i
f-
-'
<( .
I
"-
(f) .
<(
.
,Gt: ·
.
.
I\J
~
"S
A
~ '\)
,
I'll:ll
U')
',,"
J
.fif
-.- "c;j'.
:i
g.
d i3 1:1
Z'N
Q. 'It"
F
(3~
'.~'
\
<(
<Ii
V...J
t
.~
.
~
~.
.
.
o
,
~
~@
"I
~
.
v.
" ~
l"
z
. .
. v .
q.~ .
g ,,"
, "
~
~
-
[71
,~ 2-.t
-r iil 5:'
iii II
,- ~ ~
.l{ cr ~
...\1) -
W
>
'"
~.
<:>
2
52
'"
<(
"-
.3]Jill 01 ~.O'LZ
<(
'"
"
,.,'9<:
, ,q .' '<;J
..
"I.
v
"
, "
'"
.,.
'",
3
CJ
2
2
'"
f-
W
<Y
W
o
'"
'"
,OO'L e; L
3" V L ,00.00
N
.
o
..
.. .
o
.
.. .
<>
<'l
'" "
Z
<(
I
<Y
~.
o
0
.rot y<( f-
U, -' ..
0'(.fJ .
'UJ-~ :,tt:-.J . .<(
I
- CJ -,~Q'.-' q . "-
z '0..9 <> W
<S 0). 0', (f)o. '" N <( <>
s: >- -' 'i>- .0
t...'~ <Y 5 0 N
~- .,m <(go
n3 a:::z .,.-" " ,~
(f) >- UW u:i:, !O
.. ~ l>: N'
J..-::t z,
~ 0
if>
<0 (J <(
N :::;
,
..W
'bI
a::: D
. ~<( <("'.
z. .0...
8 r-; ....
,0'9l
.
.; a 0
if>
. 0
o~ .
. -' 0
-'
0
ill
.. .
.. 0
..
v
Sj
.W'
f-
N'W U'
gs,-r
Vz _
;,-
"'.
.'"
<:> ~l
2
15
-'
5 "-
ill N
W
" n <:>
"I " " .0 <(
V <Y <0
0 ;,-
" f- ;,- N
U1 <'i <'i
" W Z'OZ
f-
" ,
" " " "
..
"
<0
.,.
"
".
"
u
V
'<J
"
'0
"
, "
"
, "
,00 'Le; L 3,,17 L,OO.OO N
f-Z
X
lL
I
U1
<(
<Y
f-
I
CJ
I
'<0
X
CJ
2
o
..J
w
w
<Y
f-
U1
:J
o
:J
o
U
w
o
:::;
<(
is
W
<Y
'"
o
W
",ill
~~
-'ill
'-
23
..,;f~
-,XU
U:z
'(oW'
, "
,O'Ol
o
. .
.
I- ..,.0 <:I
...
<(
J:
"-
V1'
<(
.. .
",0
.0
.. .
o
, "
.,'09
CJ
Z
<(
I
<:> <Y
2 ~
9 0
5
~~
00
f- W
WI
W
N
-'
<(
f-
W
:::;
G33a 1'i1'l1J lIno
06Ln60j 'ON ':J3~
,,'09
,
,
, "
"
l'i
2
W
w..
Z
WW
00
0<(
0'-'
3U
o
, r-
<0(;)
,
,
O'O\:
~ .
" W
"0:.::"
U:. ...<1'
~2
o
U
, "
: "\0
-'
'<;J~
,
, "
, "
-'
,
-'
,
'","
.O'O!
.~ ~
<>
ci
W
~~
:?:;<(
-'ill
Z."-.
_3
<t'
IW
UU
Z
<0
N
,
,
-'
,
-'
W
>
<(
.,.
o
,..,
'.
, 'll
N
~
L.()
r----
w
~
f")
o
o
!:"
Q)
CO
Z
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 2
<,:~':;?:I;{}Y;';;;,\;';~~~2;jX\\y~;'
I'~"F:"'\'
'lj:
,
~
..
'5
i
,
f)
iJ
~
,;;j:
ifzr:: >,~\;~"1
.'-~
-%J!f;
Z~7'f:;:~r '
,~,"
>,.NaaT_M
-". ",~~t~CT'W
1'1
- OR Ii -Py- R - J7J-- ~ ,." - -- .
V1XJ. ,~_ ra-11L~-,-____"':_~--~-':-"-
<0 1lJ TQ) TT\\ ll\\ T~ IT <R ll""A~c~~, ' j"
U) 1Q) 1UJ ". '9'-_:_'",~:~1l 0 \Q/ 1 ~ ,.<~:~~
\, " __ ,,- D"';:' .;;.;z~~~~~--_" ~tr~-t ;fi-.s~J
t!,'-. - C~:-."_. ~~~~:- "-'~:;~f" w: -, . - .<',; _,
KNOW A~l. M<:,. .1.~ "'..c.,,~ p~~T,.~f1-~t:2~;~J:i..:,"~,;-: ..&._ :r1.'", ..,"",uii~,,,__~l ~;"~, ,~r~;.;;;
~TAHDi...V HE.l4HT":a... tH ..1, t:L.....&.II;~O" _a~~_Tv'l~wcip": TH-=' E.A_s.~ ~~ "'~T-~-MIl..LOt!'J H:~';<~ ~;O;_~_Tt~~~~~,"~;~,~__~~;~J~i~,
&c..~cn~I~c.'CI THe. $AMlt. IH'\'O 8'-o,cKto.. LCr'r.... T"AaoCl' ;;;ra.u..~ .~Aft1'!~T~&.C.~..'\l. 5,"'. Av~~ {. y~ ~!;.:~'a~~~' ~~~;ti:,~-
"hole. ~~,..... ....ND. .;!'t'~." 0.... HAWCe:. A bt..ie.OtVt".,~...._..;pr...... ~ .t;Io~ "'....c..v, 4~"'" AM 0 co,.,~e..,.. u~. ~F~IIt.'_-~~f"i:~-ro~ _~~;~~'_-
Lie. '"'..... THc..: A...o.....s.AHJ "ATI'I.<<.~"~ AHD AV"E.NUa.. "0 _~~f"e_"'N Q~NT"-"- - ':.-~. "'~' _ - -~"--:1--i' .J;:;;--~_'~~'~-"':'-'-_~l.--
", '~;, ~;~ ~~ ~~=:' }.;,;.~~~0t",~~~;
,", - - ,,' ;c,c';,'c_, ~ t .:;~c\~;t'i1t~(t, '
, . "'-, , -
~()YEtIIAHt!l
-".~c<,<I< .J, 'i:' \-
,1
t;; ,.
ii"
,
{
.~
1
ii, ';!i'
w->-;-._ ''''}i
,T:,~;~Ji~C?q j~ .~" JUT
, :rt$;;'r~J,~~ 'h~ tc-Se 11 11
~t<~: "Jf~~(; J, 7"a'r+
--"" '-<'. t,
,,;\,S Eo:;' T19a-a
-" "'!: ~,-' l;~ -'~_
c_
A NC>IE ~ S,
S'.r~e+'AC17'-;" Cd;i1lS-fYU,;~*'"
..- --, ->.- >!;- - fi-. '''''''?, ' ,
\.
:';
Ji
,
._ -to,
-.-.\}
';.-
:.\"
i'~'{-
"
.-:;-~~-.:"
~,
* .:~
--r,
'1" I
.~
'i-'
I\:)
00
'1::Jn '1::J >-tTI -0 en nO::;1
~ ~ 0 () ~ ::J ..... () o .....
~~ ::J () (') 8:'~ 5' ..... ..... ~
~g p.. ~ 8 g~ (') (')
'" 0 ::J '"
~ (') ........ rt .....
rt ~ (') rt
~i'i ........ '" p..
ft>-i
d
."
cQ'
c
iil
!'?
'Jl
l!-
~
iil
c.
(;'
'"
c.
c:
Ul
CD
;;:
'"
."
--9
~. >-
~ f}d::r::~<
n '1::J p.. ';d (1) ~. (1) ~
0(1) ....<:"....~p..
,~ ::J p.. VI p.. ~ '"' 1"7 ~
;:;' ::J (') ~(Jq 0 d ~ \
~ ~qp..~'Ogi3~
....0. rt ...... "-- 0 i3 '" ~ ~
...... ~ :;- ~ 9 M' ::J ~
::J g::J (1) p..rt,<:p..(1)
o
::J
~
()
rt
......
o
::J
D.~
8 ~
li>~
o. OJ
o ~
::J '"
EXHIBIT 4
~
t>1
~
::0
....
(:)
'"'
t>1
Z
0
~
0:
~
'"
'"'
'"
c
'"
~
t>1
>
...
tII t""
N ~
"
...
>-
<:
It>
==
=
It>
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Minutes of Meeting
January 25, 2007
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment was called to order
by Vice Chair BLAIR at 7:05 p.m. in the City Council Chambers ofthe Municipal
Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
Meredith Reckert introduced Adam Tietz who was recently hired as Planner I in
the Community Development Department
Board Members Present:
Tom Abbott
Bob Blair
Paul Hovland
Bob Howard
Larry Linker
Davis Reinhart
2. ROLL CALL
Board Members Absent:
Janet Bell
Paul Drda
Staff Members Present:
Meredith Reckert, Sr. Plauner
Adam Tietz, Planner I
Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary
3. PUBLIC FORUM
There was no one present to address the Board.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Case No. WA-06-21: An application filed by Alan Wiedmaier for
approval of (A) variances to Section 26-501.D.l (Parking Lot Paving) and
(B) Section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements) for property zoned
Industrial and located at 11990 West 52nd Avenue.
The case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She entered all pertinent
documents into the record and advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the
case. She reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended
approval of the variances for reasons, and with conditions, outlined in the staff
report.
Board of Adjustment
January 25,2007
EXHIBIT 5
- I -
In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Ms. Reckert stated that
the property owner to the south and east was unable to attend the hearing but she
has talked with him on the phone regarding his concerns. He did receive a copy
of the staff report for this case and indicated he thought it was a fair assessment
and recommendation.
Alan Wiedmaier
Mr. Wiedmaier, the applicant, was sworn in by Vice Chair BLAIR. He disagreed
that there was a need for an engineer to analyze the drainage. He stated that in the
seven years he has owned the property, he has never observed a drainage problem
even with the heaviest rains. He also stated that he has had engineers look at the
property in the past and all they could say was that the property sloped to the
south and east sides. He agreed to staff s recommended conditions regarding
landscaping requirements and parking lot striping.
In response to a question from Board Member REINHART, Mr. Wiedmaier
stated that he was attempting to sell the property to the person who purchased his
glass business. He stated that years ago, he built a garage for a storage area
connected with his residence. It is now being used as a warehouse for the glass
business. Meredith confirmed that a permit was issued for the garage to be built
as accessory to a residence. Board Member REINHART commented that the
property was then upgraded in a manner that didn't meet either residential or
industrial standards, and now he has sold the business and wants to sell the
property associated with the business.
Meredith Reckert stated that staff would like an engineer to look at the drainage
situation to know for certain that existing improvements won't affect adjacent
neighbors.
Board Member LINKER expressed concern about the drainage and commented
that he would also like to have an engineer take a look at the property. He
commented that if the drainage isn't taken care of today it can become someone
else's problem in the future.
Mr. Wiedmaier then stated that he would agree to have an engineer analyze his
property.
Board Member ABBOTT commented that this matter revolves around the City's
Northwest Subarea Plan for future redevelopment in the area. The City, therefore,
wants to discourage any major investments in these properties. Meredith Reckert
agreed and commented that if not for the subarea plan, staff would have
recommended denial.
Board Member REINHART commented that, while a certain amount of
indifference to the process may be tolerated, he believed this property owner has
certainly benefited by ignoring the city for a long period of time. He expressed
Board of Adjustment
January 25, 2007
- 2-
concern about drainage issues, also. On the other hand, he didn't want to see the
applicant be required to spend a huge amount of money to fix a problem.
Board Member HOVLAND commented that RTD plans seem to be imminent.
He agreed with Board Member REINHART that he wasn't pleased with the
chronology of events on this property. However, at this point in time, considering
future plans, staff recommendations seem to be a reasonable option.
Board Member BLAIR agreed with Board Member HOVLAND.
Board Member ABBOTT commented that he didn't think there was any chance
the buildings on this property would survive the next ten years due to the
projected RTD light rail station in this area. He also stated that he didn't have
sympathy for the applicant because of the reasons he ended up in the situation. In
reality, that property will be redeveloped in our lifetimes so the staffs
recommendations make sense to follow City Council's guidelines in not putting
excess investment into the present houses and businesses along 52nd Avenue.
There were no other individuals present who wished to address the case. Vice
Chair BLAIR closed public testimony on this case.
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member
REINHART the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer;
and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. W A-06-21 (A) is an
appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and
in recognition that there was concern registered by the neighbor adjacent to
the east; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the
public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of
the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Case No. W A-06-
21(A) (Paving Variance) be, and hereby is approved.
For the following reasons:
1. There will be no negative impact on the character of the area.
Board of Adjustment
January 25,2007
- 3-
2. Granting of the paving variance would not be detrimental to the
public welfare.
3. Granting ofthe paving variance would not impact the adequate
supply of light or air to adjacent properties and would not increase
the chance of fire or endanger the public safety.
4. Not granting the variance could result in a long-term negative impact
on the neighborhood due to investment in the property discouraging
future redevelopment as per the city's Northwest Subarea Plan.
5. Staff recommended approval.
1. The existing parking areas will be striped as laid out by staff on
Exhibit 1 including the handicapped loading space with freestanding
sign. This must be completed by April 30, 2007.
With the following conditions:
2. The existing shed, vehicles and all other outside materials stored in
the graveled "landscaped" areas along the eastern property line and
at the southern end ofthe property must be removed. This must be
completed by March 31, 2007.
3. A professional engineer must be hired to perform an analysis of the
existing conditions on the site to determine what improvements could
be made on the southern end ofthe property, if needed, to relieve
current impacts on the property to the east and south. This analysis
must be completed by March 15, 2007 and the required improvements
installed by May 15, 2007.
Board Member Reinhart offered a friendly amendment to allow the Director
of Public Works and/or the Director of Community Development discretion
to extend the completion of improvements an additional 60 days. This
amendment was accepted by Board Member ABBOTT.
The motion failed 4 to 2 with Board Members HOWARD and LINKER
voting no. (A super majority of five affirmative votes was required for approval.)
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member
REINHART the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer;
and
Board of Adjustment
January 25,2007
-4-
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. W A-06-21(B) is an
appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and
in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the
public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of
the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Case No. W A-06-
21(B) (Landscape Variances) be, and hereby is approved.
For the following reasons:
1. There will be no negative impact on the character of the area.
2. There are unique circumstances as an existing landscape buffer is
located in the 52nd Avenue right-of-way.
3. Granting of the landscape variances would not impact the adequate
supply of light or air to adjacent properties and would not increase
the chance of fire or endanger the public safety.
4. Variances will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other properties or improvements in the neighborhood
5. Related to the subarea plans, there could be a long term negative
impact on the neighborhood due to the substantial investment in the
property discouraging future redevelopment under the Northwest
Subarea Plan.
6. Staff recommended approval.
With the following condition:
1. The property owner will plant fifteen five-gallon sized low growing
coniferous shrubs in the planter area in the front of the property.
This is to be completed by March 31, 2007.
The motion passed 6-0.
5. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
Vice Chair BLAIR closed the public hearing.
Board of Adjustment
January 25, 2007
- 5 -
"[0 39\1d
r~~~~
February 21, 2007
Meredith Recker!
Senior Planner
Cily of Wheat Ridge
7500 W. 29th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033~001
Ref. M & W Glass
11990 West 52"" Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO
Drainage Letter and Plan
Job # 204-013
Dear Meredith:
As requested by the City staff and the Board of Adjustment, Alan Wiedmaier has
retained our services to perform a drainage analysis of the property located at
11990 West 52"" Avenue, Wheat Ridge. CO. The purpose of this letter is to
identify the existing conditions on the site and determine the magnitude of the
drainage impact on the downstream properties. I have attached several sheets
showing calculations and plan for your information.
The site is less than one-third of an acre in size and is currently being used as a
commercial lot with two buildings; an office structure on the north end and a
metal garage located at the southwest corner of the site. The remaining portion
of the lot is covered by either concrete or asphalt pavement and crushed gravel.
The property slopes trom the northwest to southeast at a gentle slope of
approximately 2% grade. There are no significant point discharge areas on the
property other than at gulter downspouts from the buildings. Soils on the site are
in hydrologic soil class "CO, soil group Nunn urban land.
The site lies in the Clear Creek Major Drainage Basin with flows from the site
traveling in a southeasterly direction towards Clear Creek. The site drains evenly
towards the southeast and is considered as one sub-basin. The rational method
was employed to estimate the peak discharge in the 5-year and 100 year storms,
or storm events of 20% and 1% probability, respectively. The time of
concentration tor the sub-basin was taken to be 6.48 minutes. The site
imperviousness is approximately 79% based upon the coverage shown on the
survey provided by Alpha and Omega Consultants Improvement Survey Plat,
dated November 3, 2006. The expected runoff from the site for the 5-year storm
event is 0.85 cfs and for the 100-year storm event is 1.87 cfs.
EXHIBIT 6
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PUBLIC WORKS
DATE :3j~o'1
RECEIVED 3/8/(){
.
/5'-
S /.I jj.., 17T4"2-
9G0P8EE9"[8
99:80 L00Z/ZZ/Z0
02/22/2007 09:01
8153384025
The property drains onto an adjacent site towards the south and east that is
currently being used as a recreational vehicle storage facilily. The adjacent
proper!y has placed recycled asphalt millings over a road located along the fence
line. Assuming that there could be a shallow swale located on this property to
convey the water from the subject property, there would be less than three
inches of water flowing across at a velocity of less than two feet per second. The
existing ground surface and use of the adjacent property Should be more than
capable of conveying this runoff without any excessive erosiOn or detriment.
In my opinion, the existing grading and drainage tacilities for the property do not
pose a significant hazard to the adjacent proper!les. The existing runoff from the
property will continue to flow toward Its historic point and the increased flows are
not significant. If you have questions or comments feel free to call me at
720.898.0660.
Sincerely,
Andrew J. Marner, PE
Alliance Consulting Engineers and Surveyors
Cc: Alan Wiedmaier
file
Encl: Runoff calculations
Open Channel Flow calculations
Drainage Plan
PAGE 01
11990 W 52nd Avenue
DRAINAGE PLAN
,.. ........'.-....
.
.
.
.
I
I
.
I
I
I
.
,
I
.
I
.
I
.
, ,
, : I'
I'
. ' .
1,1
. .
. ,
. .
h._.....-.........,
30
o
15 30
60
ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=30'
MINOR STORM
RUNOff COEFF.
(10 YR)
AREA (ACRES)
MAJOR STORM
RUNOff COEFF.
(100 YR)
BASIN BOUNOARY
--------------
SCALE vERlFlCA nON 'I't.NOIlIIli . ElillIIEERNI . CIImllll!:l~llnIMIMiWNl..
_GKIICIt.. .........- DMIMi ~&l'MM.IiBSIt.~
.. ..,.. tI&..Gf .......
.... *"'8. a 1 '!t .
_....__ ... ALliance Consulting
HIXl-922-1987 ~ & Sur.eyors
. 303-334-6100 ~ 544ijWARD ROAD. SUn: 2AO" AAYMA, 00 80002
___.,~,........... PH. (720) 89&-0060 *FAX (:lO3) 424-8134
J/ d: W GLASS
MAIDIG NO.
204013-.......
DRAINAGE PLAN
"....m
2/20/07
sc.ou.
1'" ;;or;; 30'
ALAN EDMAIER
1:0 39\1d
91:01>SEE918
9S:S0 L001:/1:1:/1:0
A....Weighting for Runoff Coefficient Calculation
ProJact TIlle:
Catchment to:
illustration
M&WGLASS
EXIS11NG - 5- YEAR
l\o~...1.
InmructioYls; For Met! catchment subarea, enter \'Slues for A,and c.
S\IbarelI Area Runoff Product
ID acres CoeIf.
A C" CA
il'(lUI il'(lU\ inoul OutDUI
BUILDING 0.07 0_75 0.05
PAVED 0_11 0.90 0.10
GRAVEL 0.08 0.35 0.03
s,..'" 0.27 Sum: 0.19
A,..WoIgllod Runoll CCMlfflclant (11Im eAl.um A). 0.69
"See sheel "Design Info" for Inpervlousness-b8sed runoff coefficient values.
204013UD-Ra~onal v1.02a.x1s, Weighted C 5-YR
2/21/2007, 12:32 PM
E0 39\1d
91:0P8EE918
99:80 L001:/1:1:/1:0
Area-Weighting for Runoff Coefficient Calculation
Project Tille:
Catchment ID:
M& WGLASS
EXlSllNG . 100 YEAR
Illustration
\\,..~
LEG!ND:
l'1OW I)lr........
.
c:.o:d.-_
11-,.
lnstnJcl:ions: For ~h cau:hment IWbarea, en1I;lr vall... fOl' A and C.
5ub8r8a Arelt RUIIGff Product
ID acres Coeff.
A C" CA
ifI'lllt Trilut ;i1llIJt outnut
BUILDING 0.07 0.83 0.06
PAVED 0.11 0.96 0.11
GRAVEL 0.08 0.58 0.05
Sum: 0.27 Bum: 0.22
A....WOlg..... ....- CoeIIlelonl (..... c.lIou", A) . 0.81
'see sheet ''DesIgn Info. for 1""""Ious_based rllllOff coefficient val\leS.
204013UD-Ra~o""l vl.02a.xIs, Weighted C lOa-VA
2/21/2007, 12:32 PM
1>0 39\1d
9l01>SEE918
99:S0 L00l1ll1l0
,
I
CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFf USING RAllONAL UETHOO
""'lO<tTlllo'
cmcnrnem: 10:
M " W G1..ASB
~ING. Dyr
I. Colch-.l _OIogIe DOlo
Catchm_ ID '"
koo-
Pereeflt Imp9t'Vlousness =
NRCS Soil Type..
'0
0$ ""'OS
79.00 %
CA.I>C.orD
II. Ralnfoll_.", 1(lnohllvl.CT'Pt !(C2+Td)'C3
Dt;tsign Storm Retl.Jro Period, Tr =
Cl.
C2-
C3a
Pl=
5~.
28.SO
10.00
0.786
1.45 IndIos
(il"put n;rtum period for ~ stoMl)
Onputlho """'0 of Cl)
(InpJt tho YlWe of C2)
Onput tho """0 of 03)
(in"" ono-h, ~-... Shoot 'o..;gn IRlo')
ID_ AtqtIY8I- of Flow Time (TIme of Conoontratlon) for &I C<<*hmont
Runoff Coefficient. C..
O..rido Runoff CooIllciant. C-
5-y1'. Runalf Coomoon!, (;-5.
0v0rId9 5-yr. RunQIf CQefficieot, C...
NRO$lanc,t
T)pO
co nee
CobI""",,,,,,
0.74
0.69 (...... an """,,do C value ~ .....l'Ild. at I.... blank to aocopl caIcu_ C.)
0.61
0.69 (ooter an overide C-5 value if cJe;s,ired. Qr IeaVl;ll;llaok lO accept calcl..rlatoo C-5,)
\1111II,.....
Ht~ Tmagel ShOrt'
~ Fi~d P.eAlrel
Lawno
2.5 5 1
N...,.
Ba..
Ground
'0
p~ Ar$8 &
Shallow Paved Swales
SheoI Flow
..
Rt"'" ..""" ....... "'" NRC$ Flow Flow
10 $ l """'" CDnW\" Velocity Time
Coeff nm>> V Tl
ftIft . C-5 ~:"' minutV5
,- ,~" ~..." i~" 00""",
0\I0l1and 0.0200 100 0.69 N/A 0.28 5.89
1 0.0200 101 20.00 2113 0.80
2
3
4
5
Sum 201 Compohld Te a:
fle?onelTo - 11.12
User-Entef8d Tc = 6.48
IV. Pook_ _Iolton
RoInfllllllllOnsi\oialCompullldTe.l. 4.57 moM< PooI<.""""'.ap.
RIUn'a11I-.11y 01 R<lglaOnI To. I . 3.76 InchIIv Peak ~_. ap-
Ralnlall_ nJ U.....Dofined Te.1 = 4.57 KlcMJr Peak .""".... ap.
C.leulltld values for Tc &: Of' ~ based 0" overlde ~II,I" eruored 1<< C & e.G.
0.85 ofs
0.'70 cts
0.85 cI.
204013UD-Rational V1.02a.Jdij, Tc and PeakO s..yeat
212112007.12'32 PM
S0 39\1d
9G0P8EE9"[8
9S:80 L00G/GG/G0
CAlCULAnoN OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RAl10NAL METHOD I
Proloot TIll.:
cmcrtmtm 10:
.. &WGLASS
~RrfMi -lUVYr
.. "",.hmont Hjdrologl. Dolo
Catdlment 10_
Area =
Pen:::ent lmpMvious~..
NRCS Soil Typo =
10
e.27 ""'os
79,00 %
C A.a.C.orD
II. RalnhllllntlirmaUDI1 I (lnchlhr) .. (:1 . P1/(C2 + id)"C3
Des9J Stann ~etlJm Period. Tr =
Cl =
C2-
C3=
p,-
100 years
28.50
10.00
0.786
2.70 inches
(Input relUm period for des;gn storm)
(Input tho value 01 Cl)
{inr;llJ1 thfiI wbJa 01 C2}
(Input !he vaIuo 01 03)
("put -'" prncIpIIaOOrl-o_ Sl10IIt .lltIsign Info')
II. A~wi' of FlOIIf TIR1e mme of Concentmlon} for il CQ:hmant
Runoff Coafficianr:. C ..
Overide Runoff Coefficient, C '"
!;-". ""noff CoofflCioflt. G-5 =
0\IlilriI;Ie 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient. C '"
0.74
0.8' (ent., an ovoride C wile' Ooo'ed. or ...... __ to _ oaIoulated C.)
0.6'
0.69 (eI'Yt$r an CNBride C.5 value if desired. or leave blank to ~~vpt l;alcu~t9d C-5.)
111U8tratlon
Co........
.. .
Hoe", Tillage! SIloo1 .... ""'"'" Paw.:! AI'tM"
_ow 1'1<,. - en.. SwnJool $he.llow PaWld Swales
....... """'" w....... $heetf'low
2.' . 7 10 I. 20
NRCSU!f(I
T"",
"""""""'"
Calculations;
Resch ..... "eng1h .." NRCS Flow Flow
10 . l AunofI COnvoy- V~ limo
CooIf .""" V Tf
ftII\ ft Co, ..':'" l11inule$
inDut I"""' m"" jnnut 0.....
O'vBrfand 0.0200 '00 0.69 WA 0.28 5.89
, 0.0200 101 20.ee 2.83 e.6e
2
.
4
5
SUm 201 Con\flU\1ldTc.
RegIooaJ TC . 11.12
lJoof-EnlMfJdTc= 6,48
IV. Peak Runoff Fredlcuon
R....'........ityatCompulldT.... 8.511nchlhr PoakF_.Qp=
Rain,.. """"'"" at Regiono/ Tc.1_ 7.QO _ Poak FIowr.... Qp =
R....'.. InIoo1aity at User-Defined Tc. 1 . 8.51 IllchIhr Poak _. OJ>.
CaJCUlab;Id Y.1IIues for Tc &: Qp atA bped on OV'IIrld& 'lalun erililtrBd for C Be C--5-
1.87 clIO
1.53 cis
1.a7 cfs
204013UD~R~lior1al v1 ,0000>ds. IQ' and PMkQ 1 CO-year
2I21/2Q07. 12;32 PM
90 39\1d
92:01>8EE9 "[8
9":80 L002:/2:2:/2:0
Project Deooription
W"""'_
Flow Element
Method
SOlve For
Triangular Channe
Triangular Cnanne
Manning'~ Form\ll~
Channel Oepth
In"", Onta
Mahnings Coeftic 0.030
Slope 020000 ftIfI
Left Side Slope 20.00 H: V
Right Side SIOp6 20_00 H: V
Discharge 1.87 cfs
Flesultt
Depth 2.13 in
FJowAr$B 1,1 ft2
Wetted Perlml 9.44 ft
TOp Wldtl1 9.43 ft
Critical Deptl1 0,2,2 ft
CritIcal SIopo 0.027320 ftIfI
Vgloclty 1,68 ftls
Valoclty Head 0.04 ft
Specific Ensf," 3.4 in
Froude Numbl 0.8S
Row Type 3ubcrttlcal
Worksheet
WorkSheet for Triangular Channel
Q:\...\walnage\2Q4l)'13c1ralnllge.fm2 AHJmce ~morlt SerYtcH
02J21/07 12:04:3;51 PM @HaastadMethOdS, Inc. 97 Brookside Road WaterbUry, CT OGYOe USA (203) 755-1666
L0 39\1d
9G0PSEE9"[S
Project Engineer: Andrew Marner
FloWMasterY6.1 {G14k']
Page 1 of 1
9S:S0 L00G/GG/G0
PrOjset De5criptiOl'l
WOl1($l'leet
Flow Element
Method
Solve For
Triangul:ar Channa
Triangular Channa
Mannina's Fcwnula
ChannelOepth
$e4;:tiQn Data
Mannlngs Coeffic 0.030
Slope 020000 ftItt
Depth 2_8 in
Left Sid. Slop. 20.00 H, V
Right Side Slope 20.00 H: V
Discharg9 1_87 cfl1
CrOSS section
Cross Section for Triangular Channel
..fi!n
V:1 b.
H:1
NTS
c:\...\aralnage~13dlBlna~e.fm2 Alllllnee ~ ServfoH
02121/07 12:44:40 PM @l:iaastad:Mtttlock;, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Watef'bury, CT 06708 USA (2031755-1666
Pt'ofoot Engine~r: AndJ'ew Marner
FlowM""er\l6.1[614k]
Page 1 (If 1
80 39\1d
9G0P8EE9"[S
99:80 L00G/Go/G0
\
~
~"~"\'
~~'''\.
'\Ii
- '
,""
City of Wheat Ridge \ 1
Department of Public Works
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner
Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer ;)10
FROM:
SUBJECT:
M & W Glass (Alan Wiedemaier)
DATE:
March 12, 2007
1. In his drainage analysis, the Engineer-of-Record, Mr. Andrew 1. Marner, P.E. of Alliance
Consulting Engineers and Surveyors states that "In my opinion, the existing grading and
drainage facilities for the property do not pose a significant hazard to the adjacent properties".
Today I performed an inspection of the site which indicated this appears to be a fairly accurate
statement. I did observe some minor erosion along the westerly entrance drive to the adjoining
property produced by runoff from the subject property, but in my opinion it did not appear to
have a significant negative impact to the adjoining property.
I have completed the first review of the drainage analysis received on March 8, 2007 for the M & W
Glass commercial business located at 11990 West 52nd A venue, and have the following comment:
2. If the paving variance is NOT granted by the Board of Adjustment it appears that additional
pavement will be required to bring this property into compliance with current City Code. Due
to this being a commercial property, if more pavement is added to this site then the property
will need to provide on-site stormwater detention incorporating water quality in order to bring
this property into compliance with current EPA regulations (the Clean Water Act). This
property is relatively small (only 1/3 acre) which makes the placement of a detention facility
difficult given the current site layout, it would be expensive to construct, and in the end would
provide very little added water quality benefit.
EXHIBIT 7
To Mere - M & W Glass (11990 W52nd Ave) (3~12-07).doc
POSTING CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. LV f{ ...." ()C:;~?I
PLANNING COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One)
HEARING DATE: A?'\l\.L d01~1.
I, I\t'?>,~ l \;~\ro\'\b.\.erC
".' L!.r \(name) 'f7
residing at \\~\ ~ \ -} Y \~~'-V\ IOU. .r-:
(address)
as the applicant for Case No. wlf ~ 6 c" ~( , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of
Public Hearing at .
(I 0 cat ion)
on this 11- day of f} /~ ,,':' i , 20~, and do hereby certify that
(
said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the
scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the
map below.
. \
Signature: ~ .( RA )i~
'. \....-
,
NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the
applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Development.
LY 0'"
eiT /
O~ p'"
'\j ~'l'l NE 17
e:\planning\form:
Rev. 6/6/01
"\i RVADA
~
~ I ~ ~ A- ,~~ ~ ~ ~ . F
WZ-80-29 ..
WZ-97-11 WZ-84-6 ~
I MS-'84 PID
, -
,WHEAl RIDGE ~
~ INDUSTRIAL C NTER LID. e-
. . .
.. . -" ~ I;:
~
WZ-83-5
II WZ-92-8 <(
PID . ~
JOLLY RANCHER INC. I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on Agril26, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at 7500 West 29t Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens
are invited to speak'at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petition
shall be heard:
Case No. WA-06-21: An application filed by Alan Wiedmaier for approval ofa variance
to Section 26-50I.D.l (parking Lot Paving) for property zoned Industrial (I) and located
at 11990 W. 52nd Avenue. (This case was originally heard on January 25,2007.)
Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant
ATTEST:
Michael Snow, City Clerk
To be published:
Date:
Wheat Ridge Transcript
April 12,2007
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857
The City of
Wheat Ridge
April 12, 2007
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. W A-06-21 which is a request for approval of a
variance to Section 26-50 1.D.l (Parking Lot Paving) for property zoned Industrial (I) and
located at 11990 W. 52nd Avenue. (This case was originally heard on January 25,2007.)
This case will heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council
Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on
April 26, 2007, at 7:00 p.m.
As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing
and/or submit written comments.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning
Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
\\<irv-ci-eng-OO 1 \users\kfield\Kathy\BOA \pubnotice\2007\wa0621Rehearing.wpd
L-t 0<-'
e)T /
O~ ;0'"
~~"(,
. ~
~ . A-
WZ-B0-29
I WZ.97-11 WZ-84-6
MS-98-4 PID
; \^IHEA T RIDGE
INDUSTRIAL C NfER LTD.
WZ-83-5
~ WZ-92-8
PID
JOLLY RANCHER INC. I
..........
. ~ ~ ~ ~
i .
" C-2 I
.
to
'So ~
<!)
::;:}~
~ . ~
.
~ . ~ ~
\f) "
.
U " r
~
<( ~.
. ~
SUP-93-3
I
~
~
~
-'So
.- <!)
05
wz- 3-26
WZ 4-9
!
/-
i
;
\
"
I
.9JffiAv
"
.
z
.0 0 I
. ~ ~
PID
n A-1 PAlTERN MINOR SUB
LAKEMaN CENTER SUB
/
MOUNTAIN VISTA //
/
, -/,-,,---
~ ---
.-----.--P'CD
!
W 95-12
Mg.85-~2
l
NICHOLAS GARDENS
TRACT 6
WZ-75-4 WZ-96-1~.-
/
/
I
/
/
/
-_/
I
/
./i
PID
!
GRA HIes WEST
!
!
./'-l:~:':'::'
/ \. /'
'/"~:::;;~~~;~~~~~;~Z:---"
,r // / / ....,.... .....~, I
/1 (.( ''-'''' \\1
Ii" I I'
\ \\ r',. l__-------! i I) l
RETIREMENT cQMMuNlrr ""
~~::::;::~,:// <;:
/- WZ.90-11
WZ-9a.6
..//~'l/'
NE20
OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP
WHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
---- PARCEULOTBOUNDARY
(DESIGINATES OWNERSHIP)
--. WATER FEATURE
SE17
* DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
@
~ 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
~ (APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
o 100 zoo XX) 400 fed
DEF ARTMENT Of
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
MAP ADOPTED: June 15. 1994
Last Revision: September 10, 2001
tiJ.!f~ r2~___,!?l -I (<?J~ / /(}/!-/'(li:troscan / Jelif!!: (fi/?,fe( 02 --- - - - --- --- *
13
Owner :Hance Robert A
Site ,11818 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge
Mail ,11818 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge
Use :1112 Res,Improved Land
Bedrm,2 Bath,1.00 TotRm,
Parcel
,043694
80033
Co 80033
7007 0220 0004 4827 8874
*----------------------------:
Phone
YB,1935 Pool, BldgSF,947 Ac, .45
MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Parcel ,043701 81
7007 0220 0004 4827 88
Phone ,303-940-1523
BldgSF, Ac , 9 .56
Owner :Ward Road Storage LIe
Site :*no Site Address*
Mail ,5025 Ward Rd Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Use :1129 Res/Improved Outbuilding Land
Bedrm, Bath, TotRm, YB,1950 Pool,
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner :Councilman Dan L
Site ,11995 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Mail ,11995 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Use :1112 Res/Improved Land
Bedrm, 2 Bath,1.00 TotRm,
(CO)
Parcel
:----------------*
*----------------------------:
Owner :Wiedmaier Alan
Site ,11990 W 52nd Ave Wheat
Mail ,11990 W 52nd Ave Wheat
Use :1112 Res/Improved Land
Bedrm,2 Bath,1.00 TotRm, YB,1948 Pool,
*----------------------------, MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Owner :Valentino Emanuel J Parcel
Site ,12050 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 ~~___rl
Mail ,6892 Wright Ct Arvada Co 80004 7007
Use :2112 Com,Improved Land Phone
Bedrm, Bath, TotRm, 2 YB,1948 PooL BldgSF,2,224 Ac, .27
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Owner :Tcch Management LIc Parcel :043872
Site :12000 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 yfpypn .n7/1?/?nn?
Mail ,12000 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7007 0220 0004 4827 8928
Use :3112 Ind/Improved Land ~none
Bedrm, Bath, TotRm, 1 YB,1997 PooL BldgSF,2,400 Ac, .33
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Owner ,Crawford Holding Corp Parcel. ,043926
Site :11950 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xferpn .(\':l/,....../~---
0220 0004 4827 8935
Mail ,8295 Ralston Rd #300 Arvada Co 80002 7007
Use :1112 Res,Improved Land rHUHt:;;
Bedrm, 3 Bath,1.00 TotRm, YB,1947 Pool, BldgSF,1,262 Ac, .41
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Owner ,Gilbert Donald G Parcel ,07060;0 4&27 8942
Site ,11895 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xf~--Ot17 0220 0004
Mail ,11895 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7 ,_.,,"00
Use :1112 Res/Improved Land ~none
Bedrm,2 Bath,1.00 TotRm, YB,1939 Pool, BldgSF,1,049 Ac,.50
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Owner :Aa Wholesale Storage LIc Parcel :176201
Site ,12100 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered ,02/08/2002
Mail ,5040 Acoma St Denver Co 80216 7007 0220 0004 4827 8959
Use ,3112 Ind,Improved Land <uuu~
Bedrm, Bath, TotRm, 2 YB,1985 Pool, BldgSF,44,118 Ac,1.47
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Owner ,Bailey Winnifred A Parcel ,180195
Site ,5222 Union Ct #1 Arvada 80002
Mail ,5222 Union Ct #1 Arvada Co 80002
Use :1114 Res,Townhome,Improved Land
Bedrm,2 Bath,2.50 TotRm, YB,1984 Pool,
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Owner :BenaIlo Dean J/Piorena Li+ Parcel
Site ,5202 Union Ct #1 Arvada 80002
Mail ,5202 Union Ct #1 Arvada Co 80002
Use :1114 Res , Townhome, Improved Land
Bedrm, 2 Bath,2.25 TotRm,
~none
YB,1912 Pool, BldgSF,1,092 Ac,1.40
MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Parcel ,043709
~~007 0220 0004 4827 8904
7007
,043702
^^ I....... ,- - --
0220 0004 4827 8898
Yfpy=rl
Ridge 80033
Ridge Co 80033
Phone
BldgSF,780
Ac, .26
:----------------*
,043826
"0/?0/1992
0220 0004 4827
8911
7007 0220 0004 4827 8966
Phone
BldgSF,1,249
Ac:
:----------------*
,180205
7007 0220 0004 4827 8973
YB,1984
Pool,
Phone
BldgSF,1,177
Ac:
Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner :Estates At Rainbow Ridge Ltd L
Site ,11855 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033~~~
Mail :4155 E Jewell Ave Denver Co 80222 - ~
Use :1112 Res/Improved Land
Bedrm, 3 Bath,1.75 TotRm, YB,1972 Pool,
*----------------------------; MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Owner :Hance Robert A Parcel
Site :*no Site Add~ess* Xfered
Mail ,11818 W 52nd k Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price
Use :4131 Agr,Me ow Ana-Hay Land Phone
Bedrm, Bath' TotRm, YB, PooL BldgSF, Ac,3.01
*----------------------------- MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ;----------------*
Owner :Hideaway At Rainbow Ridge Condos Assn In Parcel :200498
~~~~ : ~~~9;i~e I~~~~e~~: #6 Aurora Co 8001/4 ,.-1C 7007 0220--0'004' 4827 8997
Use :4151 Agr,Home Owner Association L1l L 1r Phone
Bedrm, Bath, TotRm, YB, Pool, BldgSF, Ac, .85
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Owner :Hideaway At Rainbow Ridge Condo Assn Inc Parcel :200500
Site ,*no Site Addr ss* Xfered ,06/29/1984
Mail ,13697 E Iliff e #6 r a Co 80014 Price
Use :4151 Agr,Home Ow Asso iation Phone
Bedrm, Bath, YB, Pool, BldgSF,
(CO)
Parcel
Xfered
:~-~-------~~----*
7007
,193697
,09/28/1993
0220 0004 4827
8980
BldgSF,1,254 Ac,.37
:----------~~----*
,195508
,10/07/1980
Ac,.69
./
/~_.---:::--
A RiUG?,~
''\>c 0
, 0\
. --'?' .4P? Q) \
'~0
~~.
Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
Robert Hance
11818 W 52nd Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Ward Road Storage Lie
5025 Ward Rd
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Alan Wiedmaier
11990 W 52nd Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Emannel Valentino & Eileen Valentino
6892 Wright Ct
Arvada, CO 80004
Crawford Holding Corp
8295 Ralston Rd #300
Arvada, CO 80002
Donald Gilbert
11895 W 52ndAve
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
W innifred Bailey
5222 Union Ct #1
Arvada, CO 80002
Dean & Piorena Benallo
Anthony Benallo
5202 Union Ct #1
Arvada, CO 80002
Robert Hance
11818 W 52nd Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Hideaway At Rainbow Ridge Condos Assn 1
13697 E Iliff Ave #6
Anrora, CO 80014
Councilman Dan L & Councilman Heidi
11995 W 52nd Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Tcch Management Llc
12000 W 52nd Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Aa Wholesale Storage Lie & Redwood Llc
5040 Acoma St
Denver, CO 80216
Estates At Rainbow Ridge Ltd L
4155 E Jewell Ave
Denver, CO 80222
Hideaway At Rainbow Ridge Condo Assn I
13697 E Iliff Ave #6
Aurora, CO 80014
*******************************
*
Search Parameters
*
*******************************
* Jefferson (CO)
* 4/11/2007
* 10,40 AM
*
*
*
*******************************
Schedule Number.. .15
043694
043701
043702
043709
043826
043872
043926
070659
176201
180195
180205
193697
195508
200498
200500
City of Wheat Ridge
Community Development Department
Memorandum
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
~oard of Adjustment
l'lMeredith Reckert
Request for reconsideration
March 16, 2007
On January 25,2007, Board of Adjustment heard Case No. W A-06-2l, a request for approval of
landscaping and paving variances for property zoned l, Light Industrial, located at 1 1990 W. 52nd
Avenue. The Board approved the request for variance to landscaping but denied the request for
variance to paving.
The applicant is requesting a reconsideration of the paving denial.
Attached is an email to the city Clerk requesting the reconsideration (Exhibit A, email). Attached is
the applicant's new evidence which is a drainage analysis regarding existing conditions (Exhibit B,
drainage analysis).
If the Board grants the request for rehearing, it will be scheduled for the April 2007 meeting.
1
Page 1 of2
Christa Jones
From: Eileen Wiedmaier [ewiedmaier@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 20078:28 AM
To: Michael Snow
Cc: Meredith Recker!
Subject: Request for rehearing
Alan L. Wiedmaier
3 Redbird Drive
Agency, MO 64401
303-482-5649
February 21,2007
Michael Snow
City Clerk
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 W. 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001
Request for Consideration for Rehearing
Case #: WA-06-21
Property Address: 11990 West 52nd Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Variance Denied: January 25, 2007
I would like to appeal the denial of the above paving variance and request consideration of a rehearing
by the Board of Adjustment. As requested by the City of Wheat Ridge Development Department, I
have obtained a drainage report from a licensed engineer that I would like to submit as new evidence.
Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Respectfully,
Alan L. Wiedmaier
EXHIBIT 1
2/23/2007
10 39\1d
. ~
eCeJVe
r '2--2-'1 - 0':1-
February 21, 2007
Meredith Recker!
Senior Planner
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 W. 29th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO 8oo33~001
Ref. M & W Glass
11990 West 521'1(I Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO
Drainage Letter and Plan
Job # 204-013
Dear Meredith:
As requested by the City staff and lhe Board of Adjustment, Alan Wiedmaier has
retained our services to perform a drainage analysis of the property located at
11990 West52M Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO. The purpose of this letter is to
identify the existing conditions on the site and determine the magnitude of the
drainage impact on the downstream properties. I have attached several sheets
showing calculations and plan for your information.
The site is less than one-third of an acre in size and is currently being used as a
commercial lot with two buildings; an office structure on the nor!h end and a
mEllaI garage located at the southwest corner of the site. The remaining por!ion
of the lot is covered by either concrete or asphalt pavement and crushed gravel.
The property slopes trom the northwest to southeast at a gentle slope of
approximately 2% grade. There are no significant point discharge areas on the
property other than at gutter downspouts from the buildings. Soils on the site are
in hydrologic soil class "cn, soil group Nunn urban land.
The site lies in the Clear Creek Major Drainage Basin with flows from the site
traveling in a southeasterly direction towards Clear Creek. The site drains evenly
towards the southeast and is considered as one sub-basin. The rational method
was employed to estimate the peak discharge in the 5-year and 100 year storms,
or storm events of 20"10 and 1% probability, respectively. The time of
concentration for the sub-basin was taken to be 6.48 minutes. The site
imperviousness is approximately 79% based upon the coverage shown on the
survey provided by Alpha and Omega Consultants Improvement Survey Plat,
dated November 3, 2006. The expected runoff from the site for the 5-year storm
event is 0.85 cfs and for the 10o-year storm event is 1.87 cfs.
EXHIBIT 2
9WP8EE918
99:80 L00G/GG/G0
02/22/2007 09:01
8153384025
The property drains onto an adjacent site towards the south and east that is
currently being used as a recreational vehicle storage facility. The adjacent
proper!Y has placed recycled asphalt millings over a road located along the fence
line. Assuming that there could be a shallow swale located on this property to
convey the water from the subject property, there would be less than three
inches of water flowing across at a velocity of less than two feet per second. The
existing ground surface and use of the adjacent property should be more than
capable of conveying this runoff without any excessive erosion or detriment.
In my opinion, the existing grading and drainage faCilities for the property do not
pose a significant hazard to the adjacent proper!ies. The existing runoff from the
property will continue to flow toward its historic point and the increased flows are
not significant. If you have questions or comments feel free to call me at
720.898.0660.
Sincerely,
Andrew J. Marner, PE
Alliance Consulting Engineers and Surveyors
Cc: Alan Wiedmaier
file
Encl: Runoff calculations
Open Channel Flow calculations
Drainage Plan
PAGE 01
11990 W 52nd Avenue
DRAINAGE PLAN
,............-..,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
, ' .
. ~ .
.. .
. . .
. .
. .
. .
h.............,
30
o
15 30
60
ORIGINAL SCALE: 1.~.30'
MINOR STORM
RUNOff COEFf.
(10 YR)
MAJOR STORM
RUNOff COEFf.
(100 YR)
BASIN BOUNDARY
--------------
SCALE \IERIFlCAlIDN ~"'- ';::'~""'l""""~
......IIlH.-- __
.tIn'......_,......
-...CJUI ~.:' . .
__ _ ALliance Consultmg
1-.m-19A7'" Englneers a Surveyors
. J03-534-67(X) ~ 5440 WARD ROAD, $l.ITE: ~.. WN}/I.,OO80002
... __.........,........... PK. (720) 8S&-0660. FAX (303) 424-8134
Jl d: W CLASS
CIlA-.a NO.
204O1J-ohinoga
DRAINAGE PLAN
""'It:
2/20/07
sc.u:.
1'" ;;;0; 30'
AI...AN w:DMAlER
000 39\1d
9oo0P8EE918
99:80 L00ooIooooIoo0
I
Area-Weighting lor Runoff Coefficient Calcullltion
I
Projacl TIlle:
Catchment ID:
M"WGLASS
EXI$1ING . 5-VEAR
Illustration
S-..-3
LECEND:
F1ow~"""-'-
.
c.o:__
--,.
Instructions: For eacf1 catchment subarea, enter ~IU$S for A and C.
SIIbarea Area RunoII ProdUCI
ID acres Coeff.
A C" CA
iroot irllUl ioout 0UtDUt
BUILDING 0.07 0.75 0.05
PAVED 0_11 0.90 0.10
GRAVEL 0.08 0.35 0.03
_o"re 0.27 Sum: 0.19
A_WoIghlod Runoff Coo/flc'ent (sum CA/sum A) . 0.69
-see sheel ''Deslgn Info" lor ''1'8''VIOll9_-b8sed rllllOff coefficient values.
204013UD-Ranonal v1.02axls, Weighted C 5-YR
2121/2007,12:32 PM
E0 39\1d
9Z0PSEE9m
9S:S0 L00Z/ZZ/Z0
I
Area-Weighting for Runoff Coefficient Calct.llation
I
Project Tille:
Cab:hment 10:
M&WGLASS
EXlSlING - 100 YEiUl
Illustration
,
Cot__
~
IMti\Jetkms: For GEl(lh catchment Sf,lbaroa, e:nwr \IliI,J1,Hil$ fe" A and C.
SUbllI'ea Area Runoff Product
ID acres CoeD.
A C" CA
irout looul il'lDUt oumut
BUILDING 0.07 0.83 0.06
PAVED 0.11 0.96 0.11
GRAVEL 0.06 0.58 0.05
Sum: 0.27 SUm: 0.22
A....W..g..od RIl...... C<Ioffldonl (..... CAlou," AI . 0.81
'See sheet "Design Info" for Inpervlou!lll8!lSob8sed runoff coefIIClenI values.
204013UD-Ratlonal v1.02a.lds, Weighted C 100-VA
2/21/2007, 12:32 PM
P0 39\1d
9G0PSEE9"[S
99:S0 L00G/GG/G0
f CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USINO RATIONAL I.IlOTHOD
Prof"'" TIlfe'
ca1Ctlment 10:
MAW GlASS
1:AJD11nY. GYr
I. ea",___cc","
Catchml;ll1t ID:II:
M..._
Peroent Impen1ouSl1M;S =
NRCS Soil Type..
'0
Q27 Acr..
79.00%
CA,B,C,orD
~ign Stonn R<<vro Period. Tr =
Cl.
C2-
C3a
P,=
5 yoars
28.50
'0.00
0.766
'.45_
(input nm,lm period lor d86ign srotm)
rlf'lllltthe valu. of Cl)
(InptJt the vWB of (2)
Onput tho vnlJ. of c:l)
(input on<>-hr pooc;p;toOOn-_ Shnat "Design Into")
U. RolnfoJllnIQnnoll.. I (Inoft"")' Cl . P1 ~C2 + Td)"C3
III. A~yel. of Flow Tlmt (TIme of Concentra1lon) fOf . Cotehmont
Runoff Coeff'ctem, C..
O.....rioo Runoff Coeftlcient. C-
5-yr. Runoff Cooffidont, (;-5.
OVarldB 5-vr. Runoff Coefffcient, C '"
0.74
0.69 (enter an overide C value if desired. or lsaw blank to accept caJculated C.)
O.G'
0,69 (ont9r an overide C-S value if dlilsired. or IEIa...e b1ijnk lO acoopt ealctJlated C-S.l
Illustration
NFlCSl&nd
TiP"
.......
--
Till" Sl\Ort
ro~1d PMtI.lref
L>wfI<
5 7
Nto<1y
Bare
Groul'ld
10
co ..
2.5
Caicl.l.lcOio~
Rt"" ...... Lto\lllR ;-" NRCS I Flow -
ID $ L Runoff Conwy. Velocity Time
.".. nn.. V Tl
ftIft . <>5 ~~n minlItVS
,- ,- N~' i~' N~U1
~ 0.0200 '00 O.W NlA 0.28 5-8ll
1 0.0200 '01 20.00 2.83 0.80
2
3
4
5
Sum 201 Computed Te '"'
Regional T c .. 11,12
User-Entered Tc GAll
IV. ""'k Ro..... _'011 on
RalnfaH IntohOity at Computed Te. I. 4.57 1nchIh< PoaI< FIooI<.... Qp.
R..,fall1 ntonsliyat_Tc.1_ 3.7Blnoh/hr PookF_.Qp.
Ralnfall_ nt U...--OeBned Te. 1= 4.57 Ind1Ihr Pook F_, Qp.
Clllculmed valUMi fot Tc &: Qp lire based On overlde vu.lu", emeted for C & C.fi.
0.85 cfs
0.70 ofs
0.85 cf~
204013U[)"'Ratlonal V1.02a.x1;. Tc and PeakO s-yea(
212112007,12'32 PM
90 39\1d
9G01>8EE9 "[8
99:80 L00G/GG/G0
CALCUlAnoN OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RA'IlONAL ME1llOl) I
ProJOOl TIlle:
cateftmtm W:
"''' W GLASS
EXlSllIIOI- ''!''Y'
I. CltI_ Hyd,oIoglo 0olo
Cafd1ment ID..
Area .
Peroont Imparvioo8nijljS.
NRCS Soil Typo =
10
0271\cr..
79.00 %
o A.B.O.OfD
It. Rllnfatllnformlltioo I (Inchlhr) ;;; (:1 .. P1/(C2 + td)^C3
Das9J Stomi ~etum Period. Tr =
01 =
02-
G3=
P,-
100 years
28.50
10.00
0.7ll6
2.70 _
(11lfXJl return period IOf deo;gn stann)
(Input tho value 01 Cl)
(inlAA 1he wlue 01 G2)
(Input tho value 01 (3)
("put on<Hv pI'ROipltat_ Shoot "Design Info;
1M. A....will of ROlf Tlnw (TIme of eoncemr.t4on) for iii ~hment
Runoff CoafficiBlJ(, G_
Oveoide Runoff Goefficiern, 0 =
0-". Runoff Coefficient. C-S =
0vtiNii;Ie S-yr. Runoff Coefficient. C =
0.74
0.81 (9f1ter an awlide C value if desired, or ~ blank to accepI: calculated C.)
0.61
0.69 (9I1t$r W'l overlde C.S value if desired. orJeave bhmk 10 .w;~pt calcl,lla19d 0-5.)
Ulwrtndlon
"""-"'"
~
.. .
.....". TIllage! Shoo1 Noar1y G""'''' Pavtd AMM &
_ow Fiel. "....., - Swn"'" $hlilllow PaWKl Swales
...... G""",, W......n Sheet FlOW
2.5 , 7 '0 '5 2()
Calculations;
Rsach .'ope leogth 5-" NRCS - -
10 . I. Runoff Convey- Ve_ Tl...
CoefI .... V TI
flill . (;.5 N~' rninutlis
inDUf ir<>ut O'~' jnnut 0"'''''
OVgrland 0.0200 100 0.69 NlA 0.28 5.89
1 0.0200 '01 20.00 2.fl:l O.BO
2
3
.
S
Sum 201 Compu1Od To_ ..US
R1l!liooaJT.- 11.12
U"",-E_odTe= B.411
IV. """k Runolfl'l'odlction
R""foI'ntonsityalGompuWT..I= 8.51 Inchlhr P..H_.Qp=
_Idlntsneily at RegIonal Te. 1= 7.00 """"" Peel< F-. Op =
Rim'oIIntonsityalUsor-001In<dT.,1= 8.511nch1hr Penl<F_.....Qp=
CaJcuIBt.,t VoJIlyes for To &: Qp atA b,Hd on CMlrlde VllIliteti IIntered for C & c-5.
1.87 ofs
l.53cfs
1.87cfs
204013Uo...Ra1iQnal vl ,0000Jds. Tc snd Paaka 1 nO-year
212112007,12:32 PM
90 39\1d
9G0v8EE918
99:80 L00G/GG/G0
Project De~ption
W""'"heet
ploweamant
Me1l1od
SOlve For
TrIangular Channe
Tliangular Channa
Manning'$ Fonnule
Channal Depth
Input Dnta
Mahnings Coeffic 0,030
SIopo 02??oo ft/ft
Left Side Slope 20.00 H, V
Right Side Slope 20.00 H, V
Discharge 1,87 efs
R9SUIts
Depth 2.8 in
Flow Area 1,1 ft2
Wetted Perlml 9.44 ft
TOp Width 9043 ft
CritiCal Deptl1 0,22 ft
Critioel Slope 0.027$20 ft/ft
Velocity 1.68 ftls
Vnloclty Ho.~ 0.04 ft
Spec1tlc Ent;ir\ 3.4 in
Froude Numb! 0.8S
Row Type 3ubcrttlcal
Worksheet
Worksheet for Triangular Channel
(::\...\dralnage\204I)'1acJralnage.fm.2 Aflil!lnce~", Sel"lfeH
02/21/07 12;43:61 PM @HamrtadMethOdS. Inc. 37 Brook:$ide Road WatefbWy, GT 06706 USA (203) 75&1666
L0 39\1d
9Z;0P8EE918
Project Engineer. Ancfr/ilw Marner
FlowMasterV6.1 [El14k}
Pa!;le 1 01'
99:80 L00Z;/Z;Z;/Z;0
CrOSS section
Cross Section for Triangular Channel
PrOjaot DSlScriptiOn
Wol'k$heet
Flow Eloment
Method
Solve For
Triangular Channa
TriangulBr Channa
~nnina's FotmlJ~
Channel Oepth
Section Data
Manning$: Coaffic 0.030
S/ope 020000 ftI~
Depth 2.8 in
Lo~ Side S/ope 20.00 H: V
Right Side Slope 20.00 H: V
Discharge 1.87 efa
..flIn
V:1b,
H:1
NTS
Pr'otod Engineer: Andr'ew Marner
c:\'..\dralnage\204013drsinage,1m.2 Am.nee OI\1t~~ SeMCM FlowMaster \16.1 1614K]
02121107 12;44:40 PM @J-taeiitadMlrthodt:i, Inl;:. 37 Brookside: Road Wa1f:lf'bury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1~6 Page 1 Qf 1
80 39\1d
9G0~8EE918
99:80 L00G/GG/G0
Page 1 of2
Meredith Reckert
From: Eileen Wiedmaier [ewiedmaier@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:28 AM
To: Michael Snow
Cc: Meredith Recker!
Subject: Request for rehearing
· 9
~ceJYe
8.'Z.1-0~
Alan L. Wiedmaier
3 Redbird Drive
Agency, MO 64401
303-482-5649
February 21, 2007
Michael Snow
City Clerk
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 W. 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001
Request for Consideration for Rehearing
Case #: W A-06-2l
Property Address: 11990 West 52nd Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Variance Denied: January 25, 2007
I would like to appeal the denial of the above paving variance and request consideration of a rehearing
by the Board of Adjustment. As requested by the City of Wheat Ridge Development Department, I
have obtained a drainage report from a licensed engineer that I would like to submit as new evidence.
Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Respectfully,
Alan L. Wiedmaier
2/22/2007
Page 1 of 1
Meredith Reckert
From: Meredith Reckert
Sent: Wednesday, February 21,20078:47 AM
To: 'ewiedmaier@yahoo.com'
Subject: appeal letter
Hi, Alan and Eileen:
We do not have a "form" letter for a request for rehearing and I was unable to find a good example. Sorry.
Your letter should contain the following information:
Name, mailing address. address of property, case number (WA-06-21), hearing board (Board of Adjustment),
date of denial (January 25,2007). You should say that you would like to appeal the denial of the paving variance
and are requesting consideration for a rehearing.
I will notify the City Clerk's office that you will be emailing the request for rehearing.
Meredith
Meredith Reckert, AlCP
Senior Planner
Wheat Ridge Community Development Department
Telephone: 303.235.2848
FAX: 303.235.2857
2/21/2007
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
Telephone 303/235-2846
FAX 303/235-2857
The City of
Wheat
Ridge
February 9, 2007
Alan Wiedmaier
3 Red Bird Drive
Agency, MO 64401
Dear Mr. Wiedmaier:
RE: Case No. WA-06-21
Please be advised that at its meeting of January 25,2007, the Board of Adjustment DENIED request
(A) variances to Section 26-501.D.l (Parking Lot Paving) for property zoned Industrial and located at
11990 West 52nd Avenue for the following reason:
I. The motion to approve failed 4 to 2 with two Board Members voting no. (A super majority of
five affirmative votes was required for approval.)
Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision. Should you decide to
appeal the decision of the Board, you will need to notifY the Jefferson County district court in writing
within 30 days of the Board's decision.
The Board of Adjustment APPROVED request (B) variances to Section 26-502 (Landscaping
Requirements) for property zoned Industrial and located at 11990 West 52nd Avenue for the
following reasons:
I. There will be no negative impact on the character of the area.
2. There are unique circumstances as an existing landscape buffer is located in the 52nd Avenue
right-of-way.
3. Granting of the landscape variances would not impact the adequate supply oflight or air to
adj acent properties and would not increase the chance of fire or endanger the public safety.
4. Variances will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties or
improvements in the neighborhood
5. Related to the subarea plans, there could be a long term negative impact on the neighborhood
due to the substantial investment in the property discouraging future redevelopment under the
Northwest Subarea Plan.
6. Staff recommended approval.
Alan Wiedmaier
Page 2
February 9,2007
With the following condition:
1. The property owner will plant fifteen five-gallon sized low growing coniferous shrubs in the
planter area in the front of the property. This is to be completed by March 31, 2007.
Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the
Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, January 25,2007. This variance
shall automatically expire within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date it was granted, July 24,
2007, unless a building permit has been obtained.
Subsequent to the January 25 public hearing, you indicated that you would like to appeal the denial
decision for the paving variance. The request for rehearing must be filed in the office of the City
Clerk within 30 days from the date of the original decision (by February 23). New evidence must be
submitted in writing which could not have been presented at the previous hearing. At the next
regularly scheduled meeting (March 22), the Board shall decide if the new evidence warrants a
rehearing as New Business. You must be at the March 22 meeting to present your justification for the
rehearing. If the rehearing is granted, the case will be scheduled for public hearing at the next
available date (April 26).
Attached per your request is a list of professional engineers familiar with the policies, procedures and
requirements of the City of Wheat Ridge.
Please feel free to contac1 me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
-t~~
Administrative Assistant
Enclosures: Certificates of Resolution
Draft of Minutes
cc: WA-06-21 (case file)
Building File
\\srv-ci--eng-OO 1 \users\kfield\Kathy\BOA \CORRESP\2007\wa0621approval-denial.wpd
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Minutes of Meeting
January 25, 2007
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The regular meeting ofthe Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment was called to order
by Vice Chair BLAIR at 7:05 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal
Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge,
4.
Meredith Reckert introduced Adam Tietz who was
the Community Development Department
2. ROLL CALL
Commission Members Present:
,ith Reckert, Sr. Planner
Tietz, Planner I
Lazzeri, Recording Secretary
3.
A. Ca~l!i"W A-06-12: An application filed by Alan Wiedmaier for
appro'~;;ff'of (A) variances to Section 26-501.D.l (Parking Lot Paving) and
(B) S~ction 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements) for property zoned
Industrial and located at 11990 West 52nd Avenue.
The case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She entered all pertinent
documents into the record and advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the
case. She reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staffrecommended
approval ofthe variances for reasons, and with conditions, outlined in the staff
report.
Board of Adjustment
January 25,2007
- 1 -
In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Ms. Reckert stated that
the property owner 10 the south and east was unable to attend the hearing but she
has talked with him on the phone regarding his concerns. He did receive a copy
of the staff report for this case and indicated he thought it was a fair assessment
and recommendation.
Alan Wiedmaier
Mr. Wiedmaier, the applicant, was sworn in by Vice Chair BLAIR. He disagreed
that there was a need for an engineer to analyze the drainage. He stated that in the
seven years he has owned the property, he has never obse .ed a drainage problem
even with the heaviest rains. He also stated that he has gineers look at the
property in the past and all they could say was that t1;, perty sloped to the
south and east sides. He agreed to staff s recomlI);/> regarding
landscaping requirements and parking lot stripjng:'1Mi
:<.> ~,.
In response to a question from Board MemlWer REiNHART,
stated that he was attempting to sell th..' erty t6ct):le person wh
glass business. He stated that years ago, .It a;;~<J;~e for a sto /. area
connected with his residence. It is now bein ]f'ils a warehouse (or the glass
business. Meredith confirme that a permit wa ed for the garage to be built
as accessory to a residence. B ember RE T commented that the
property was then upgraded in at didn't her residential or
industrial standards, and now he ... d wants to sell the
property associated with the busineS.$.
\"rJ'"...... ".,~ "
Meredith Re
situation t
neighbors.
like an engineer to look at the drainage
. provements won't affect adjacent
concern about the drainage and commented
engineer take a look at the property. He
isn't taken care of today it can become someone
that he would agree to have an engineer analyze his
Board MemBer ABBOTT commented that this matter revolves around the City's
Northwest Subarea Plan for future redevelopment in the area. The City, therefore,
wants to discourage any major investments in these properties. Meredith Reckert
agreed and commented that if not for the subarea plan, staff would have
recommended denial.
Board Member REINHART commented that, while a certain amount of
indifference to the process may be tolerated, he believed this property owner has
certainly benefited by ignoring the city for a long period oftime. He expressed
Board of Adjustment
January 25, 2007
- 2-
concern about drainage issues, also. On the other hand, he didn't want to see the
applicant be required to spend a huge amount of money to fix a problem.
Board Member HOVLAND commented that RTD plans seem to be imminent.
He agreed with Board Member REINHART that he wasn't pleased with the
chronology of events on this property. However, at this point in time, considering
future plans, staff recommendations seem to be a reasonable option.
Board Member BLAIR agreed with Board Member HOVLAND.
Board Member ABBOTT commented that he didn't thi~~ffijgtll was any chance
the buildings on this property would survive the next&~J!\ years due to the
projected RTD light rail station in this area. He alsl~til1f5?, hat he didn't have
sympathy for the applicant because of the reasons\~e end in the situation. In
reality, that property will be redeveloped in ,,~times so aff s
recommendations make sense to follow ' Council's guidelin not putting
excess investment into the present ho d busi sses along 5 hue.
<'/
Upon a motion by Board Me
REINHART the following reso
by Board Member
y an administrative officer;
t Appli~~ation Case No. W A-06-21(A) is an
'16';' of an administrative officer; and
,n posted the fifteen days required by law, and
concern registered by the neighbor adjacent to
Where
public we
the regulatio;
pplied for may be granted without detriment to the
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of
governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Case No. W A-06-
21(A) (Paving Variance) be, and hereby is approved.
For the following reasons:
1. There will be no negative impact on the character of the area.
Board of Adjustment
January 25, 2007
- 3 -
2. Granting of the paving variance would not be detrimental to the
public welfare.
3. Granting of the paving variance would not impact the adequate
supply of light or air to adjacent properties and would not increase
the chance of fire or endanger the public safety.
4. Not granting the variance could result in a long-term negative impact
on the neighborhood due to investment in the property discouraging
future redevelopment as per the city's Subarea Plan.
5. Staff recommended approval.
1.
~/ltl1ill8:~~.
,.'i:;i)1"~'~'~'"i'z" .
The existing parking areas will ~;e?striped as laid ou
Exhibit 1 including the handl!(~R ed loa ~. g space witli
sign. This must be completea b"" '1 Q07.
With the following conditions:
2. tside materials stored in
stern property line and
ved. This must be
3. A proft;~$ gineer mJ~fbe hired.,I perform an analysis of the
exist' ~1~C"condl c'~'~~ on the sit'l!'lto determine what improvements could
be, n the "''uthern end ~~jpe property, if needed, to relieve
currentpropel'jI)Vto the east and south. This analysis
be co "'15, 2007 and the required improvements
by
'o;;;;:,'cct<"
I'd Member ~~lJlhart", ered a friendly amendment to allow the Director
lic Works ./or tile Director of Community Development discretion
the comII1~tion of improvements an additional 60 days. This
w :~epted by Board Member ABBOTT.
The motion" ed 4 to 2 with Board Members HOWARD and LINKER
voting no. (1\ super majority of five affirmative votes was required for approval.)
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member
REINHART the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer;
and
Board of Adjustment
January 25,2007
-4-
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. W A-06-21(B) is an
appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and
in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the
public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of
the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjust
21(B) (Landscape Variances) be, and hereby is a
ewlfJ@llseNo. WA-06-
ed.
For the following reasons:
1. There will be no negative impa
2.
3.
'>",,--
Granting of the land~"'~"
supply of light or air t
the chance of fire or en
ot impact the adequate
"would not increase
4.
5. re could be a long term negative
ue to the substantial investment in the
ing future redevelopment under the Northwest
1. perty owner will plant fifteen five-gallon sized low growing
coni rous shrubs in the planter area in the front of the property.
This is to be completed by March 31, 2007.
The motion passed 6-0.
5. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
Vice Chair BLAIR closed the public hearing.
Board of Adjustment
January 25,2007
- 5 -
6. OLD BUSINESS
. Meredith reminded Board members that terms are ending and it is time to re-
apply.
. Election of officers - It was moved by Board Member HOVLAND and
seconded by Board Member REINHART to hold election of officers for
the Board of Adjustment at the next meeting. The motion passed 6-0.
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Approval of Minutes - December 13, 200(i.: ....
.
It was moved by Board Member HOxt~D aiIa:~~.fonded by Board
Member ABBOTT to approve th~i6fn'ute's of Dectijfll:~! 13, 2006 as
presented. The motion passed;ffnimously.',."ij;.:<
'i1m:4:L".)
8. ADJOURNMENT
Vice Chair BLAIR
Ann?Lazzeri, Secretary
Board of Adjustment
Board of Adjustment
January 25, 2007
- 6-
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
CC~[py
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado, on the 25th day of January, 2007.
CASE NO: W A-06-2 I (A)
APPLICANT'S NAME: Alan Wiedmaier
LOCATION: 11990 West 52nd Avenue
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Case No. W A-06-21(A) is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an
administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition
that there was concern registered by the neighbor adjacent to the east; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose ofthe regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
W A-06-21(A) (Paving Variance) be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A variance to Section 26-50l.D.l for commercial paving
requirements.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. There will be no negative impact on the character of the area.
2. Granting of the paving variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare.
3. Granting ofthe paving variance would not impact the adequate supply oflight or air to
adjacent properties and would not increase the chance of fire or endanger the public
safety.
4. Not granting the variance could result in a long-term negative impact on the
neighborhood due to investment in the property discouraging future redevelopment as per
the city's Northwest Subarea Plan.
5. Staff recommended approval.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution WA-06-21(A)
Page two (2)
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The existing parking areas will be striped as laid out by staff on Exhibit 1 including the
handicapped loading space with freestanding sign. This must be completed by April 30,
2007.
2. The existing shed, vehicles and all other outside materials stored in the graveled
"landscaped" areas along the eastern property line and at the southern end of the property
must be removed. This must be completed by March 31, 2007.
3. A professional engineer must be hired to perform an analysis of the existing conditions
on the site to determine what improvements could be made on the southern end of the
property, if needed, to relieve current impacts on the property to the east and south. This
analysis must be completed by March 15,2007 and the required improvements installed
by May 15, 2007. The Manager of Public Works and/or Director of Community
Development will be given discretion to extend the completion of improvements an
additional 60 days.
VOTE:
YES:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABBOTT, BLAIR, HOVLAND, REINHART
HOWARD, LINKER
BELL, DRDA
DISPOSITION: A variance to Section 26-501.D.l for commercial paving requirements was
DENIED, based on Chapter 2, Article 3, Section 2-53(d) of the City of Wheat Ridge Codes of
Law which state that Board of Adjustment motions not carried are thereby deemed denied.
ADOPTED and made effective this 25th day of J anuarv, 2007.
~~">d 1~
Robert Blair, Vice Chair
Board of Adjustment
~r71v1
Ann Lazzeri, Secre~
Board of Adjustment
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
(c~f1r
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado, on the 25th day of Januarv. 2007.
CASE NO: WA-06-21(B)
APPLICANT'S NAME: Alan Wiedmaier
LOCATION: 11990 West 52nd Avenue
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Case No. W A-06-2l(B) is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an
administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days fequired by law, and in recognition
that there were no protests registered by the neighbor adj acent to the east; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose ofthe regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
WA-06-21(B) (Landscape Variances) be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A variance to Section 26-502.D.3.c.l (20% commercial landscaped
coverage requirement; a variance to Section 26-502.C.l (maximum of35% non-living
landscaping; a variance to Section 26-502.C.3.a (commercial street tree requirement); and a
variance to Section 26-502.C.3.b (additional trees and shrubs required.)
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. There will be no negative impact on the character ofthe area.
2. There are unique circumstances as an existing landscape buffer is located in the 52nd
Avenue right-of-way.
3. Granting of the landscape variances would not impact the adequate supply oflight or air
to adj acent properties and would not increase the chance of fIfe or endanger the public
safety.
4. Variances will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties or
improvements in the neighborhood.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution W A-06-21(B)
Page two (2)
S. Related to the subarea plans, there could be a long term negative impact on the
neighborhood due to the substantial investment in the property discouraging future
redevelopment under the Northwest Subarea Plan.
6. Staffrecommended approval.
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. The property owner will plant fifteen five-gallon sized low growing coniferous shrubs in
the planter area in the front of the property. This is to be completed by March 31,2007.
NO:
ABSENT:
ABBOTT, BLAIR, HOVLAND, HOWARD, LINKER,
REINHART
None
BELL, DRDA
VOTE:
YES:
DISPOSITION: A variance to Section 26-S02.D.3.c.l (20% comIDerciallandscaped coverage
requirement; a variance to Section 26-S02.C.1 (maximum of3S% non-living landscaping; a
variance to Section 26-S02.C.3.a (commercial street tree requirement); and a variance to Section
26-S02.C.3.b (additional trees and shrubs required) was APPROVED.
ADOPTED and made effective this 25th day of Januarv. 2007.
R~~
Robert Blair, Vice Chair
Board of Adjustment
~~
Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
Board of Adjustment
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING:
January 25,2007
CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert
CASE NO. & NAME: Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedrnaier
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a variances for commercial paving and commercial
landscaping in an I zone district
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
11990 W. 52nd Avenue
NAME OF OWNER(S):
Alan Wiedrnaier
APPROXIMATE AREA:
11,793 square feet
PRESENT ZONING:
Light Industrial (I)
PRESENT LAND USE:
glass shop office and warehouse
ENTER INTO THE RECORD:
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
(X) CASE FILE AND PACKET MATERIALS
(X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION
Site
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
1
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been
met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUESTS /EXISTING CONDITIONS
The property in question is located at 11990 W. 5Znd Avenue and is zoned Light Industrial (I).
Current use of the property is as a commercial glass business office and shop area.
Although the property has Light Industrial zoning, it was originally developed residentially prior to the
incorporation ofthe City. The property contains 11,793 square feet ofland area and has the original
house on it which is approximately 800 square foot in size. According to the Jefferson County Assessor
information, the house was built in 1948. In 1999, the applicant purchased the property. A large garage
with 1800 s.f. of footprint was constructed in ZOO I. At the time of permitting, the property owner
indicated that it was a garage accessory to the house where he was residing and would be for his own
personal use. (Exhibit I, Survey/Site Plan)
In Z003, the applicant met with the Community Development department to discuss the requirements
needed to operate a glass business on his property. He was informed that he needed to apply for a
building permit to bring the property up to commercial standards with required parking and paving,
commercial landscaping and interior structure modifications. To this date, a permit for this
renovation/improvement has never been approved or issued. Code enforcement action has been pursued
several times with no resolution to the situation. The property has now sold and the former owner is
attempting to legitimize the existing situation through the variance process as part ofthe purchase
contract.
The City of Wheat Ridge has many existing homes along major corridors zoned commercially or
industrially, most of which were built prior to incorporation. As the City of Wheat Ridge has continued
to develop and commercialize, many once-residential streets have now become commercial collector
and arterials. Structures and properties originally developed as homes have become undesirable for
residential use as traffic on these streets has intensified. The existing commercial zone districts allow
existing single family homes to remain in perpetuity, however no new freestanding residential units are
permitted.
Many of the residential properties with commercial zoning located on the arterials and collector streets
have been converted to commercial businesses. When a property is converted from residential to
commercial, it must be in conformance with all codes and regulations prior to being considered a legal
conversion. These requirements include, but may not be limited to, compliance by the structure with
applicable building and fire codes, installation of commercial paving and striping based on an approved
drainage report and installation of commercial landscaping.
The applicant's variance requests relate to commercial paving and landscaping requirements in order to
legitimize the use of the property for a commercial glass operation.
Request A: Off-Street parking requirements
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
2
Section 26.-501.D.1. requires all uses other than single and two family residential to have hard surfaced
paving by concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or other hard materials. In this case portions of the parking
and drive area are covered in asphalt or concrete. Other portions are graveled. The applicant wishes to
retain the graveled areas "as is".
The current circulation pattern on the property allows for entry to the site from a curb cut located
adjacent to the western property line. Proceeding straight in, parking is located on the west side of the
office which is paved in concrete. Proceeding across the front ofthe property leads to the east side of
the office. Continuing south leads toward the warehouse area. This area of the property is the graveled
portion. There is adequate parking on the site given the building sizes (7 total parking spaces with one
handicapped space); however, these parking spaces are not currently striped.
If the parking lot is required to be paved, Public Works will require submission of a drainage plan and
report meeting today's standards and will likely require a large detention pond at the southeast comer of
the property. The property currently slopes from northwest to southeast. Drainage on the property
follows this historic flow pattern.
Request B: Landscaping requirements
Pursuant to the zoning and development code, the commercial landscaping coverage requirement is 20%
(Section 26-502.D.3.c.l.) Ofthis 20%, up to 35% can be made up of non-living materials such as bark
and rock (Section 26-502.C.1.). The current property configuration allows for 14.6% landscaped
coverage. This coverage includes a 5' wide rock strip extending down the eastern property line and a
20' wide rock strip on the southern property line. The strip along the eastern property line is separated
from the drive area by a concrete curb. Both of these areas are devoid of any live plant materials. There
is one tree existing on the property located adjacent to the eastern property line. It is a deciduous tree
(species unknown) and is located about two-thirds of the way down the eastern property line. It is
roughly 2' in diameter. Staff has calculated that the "landscaping" on the property is comprised of95%
non-living materials. Staff would note that the 20% commercial landscaped coverage requirement was
increased from 10% during the 2001 zoning code rewrite.
Existing on the front of the property in the W. 52nd Avenue right-of-way is a large landscaped area
comprised of a brick planter measuring 45' x 5' containing an 18" diameter coniferous tree. Because it is
in the r-o-w, it can't be counted towards on-site landscaping, even though it appears that it is part of the
property. The property owner has always maintained this area and has indicated that he is willing to
plant additional plant materials in this area.
Section 26-502.C.3.a. requires one street tree for every 30' oflot frontage. Based on a lot width of75',
three street trees would be required where there are none existing. The existing mature tree in the front
planting area gives the appearance of having a tree on the property and if it were, it would qualify as at
least three street trees due to its size.
Section 26-502.C.3.b. requires an additional tree and 10 shrubs for every 1000 square feet oflandscaped
area. Given this lot size, an additional three trees and 30 shrubs would be required on the property in
addition to the required street trees. Staff believes that the large deciduous tree on the eastern property
line would compensate for the three additional trees required.
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
3
II. ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND AREA CONDITIONS
The property is abutted on the east, west and south by property zoned I, Light Industrial.
Corresponding development includes vacant property to the east and south which is part of a
larger parcel consisting of9.5 acres. The southern one-third ofthat parcel is used for RV
storage. (Exhibit 2, Aerial photo with zoning) Farther to the east on W. 52nd Avenue is a single
family residence and alpaca farm. Under that same ownership to the south and west is Hance
Subdivision which is zoned R-l and platted as single family lots. This subdivision has not been
developed to date. (Exhibit 3, Hance Subdivision Plat)
Abutting the property on the west is a single family home zoned I which appears as if it is still
used residentially. Farther to the west on the south side of 52nd Avenue is an animal
crematorium. Continuing west towards Ward Road on the south side of 52nd Avenue is
commercial property under a variety of ownership used as office/warehouse, retail, commercial
parking and gasoline sales.
Across the street is property located in the City of Arvada, zoned residentially. Traveling west
on Ward Road, the residential units transition to commercial uses.
III. NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN
In 2004, the City initiated a study on the state ofthe City in an effort to identify issues facing the
community. "Repositioning Wheat Ridge: Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy" focuses on
population and household trends, jobs, housing market and commercial inventory. The goal was
to restore Wheat Ridge to a community of choice for homeowners and businesses. One of the
recommendations was for the City to undertake subarea planning to focus on unique
opportunities and challenges facing certain areas in the City. The northwest subarea with
boundaries generally of 52nd Avenue on the north, Simms and Tabor Streets to the east, 1-70 on
the south and Ward Road to the west was one of these targeted areas.
This subarea plan completed in 2006 was considered a priority since it is the location ofthe
proposed RTD Gold Line transit station. The potential for a light rail station brings opportunities
for development and redevelopment for transit oriented land uses. Transit-oriented land use
typically produces a mix of uses including retail, office and residential that is in close proximity
to convenient transit. It is oriented to the pedestrian rather than the private automobile and
encourages higher density land uses.
The Northwest Subarea is identified as having the potential to become a mixed use "village"
with a slightly urban character near the transit station in the vicinity of 50th and Ward,
transitioning to more suburban as it extends to the north and east. The plan does not change
existing allowable uses or zoning but provides broad guidance regarding future land use
decisions in the area. The preferred land use map designates the subject property as "light
industrial". (Exhibit 4, Preferred land use map)
Board of Adjustment
Case No. WA-06-21/Wiedmaier
4
The light industrial designation is defined as having permitted uses that are commercial and light
industrial in nature. Buildings should be designed as timeless transitional buildings which
enhance the pedestrian environment so that the structure can transition from commercial use to
commercial use (such as a retail facility to a restaurant use). The ground floor should have 60%
transparency and the buildings should be pushed to the streets with a 0' setback. Parking should
be located in the rear.
The plan indicates that since the light rail development is several years away; existing businesses
must be allowed to operate and expand but must not preclude the ultimate development
objectives. More specifically that "existing buildings and uses are encouraged to continue" and
that "new buildings and improvements that are not consistent with the...plan... should be ofa
temporary nature such that they can be amortized and removed with modest expense at such time
that the planned roads and other infrastructure are developed."
There are implications for road connections including the widening ofW. 52nd Avenue with a
pedestrian path and a north-south street connection which could impact the property and any
substantial improvements.
IV. VARIANCE CRITERIA
There are two variance actions which must occur to approve the applicant's requests.
Request A: A variance to Section 26.-501.D.1. for commercial paving requirements.
Request B: A variance to Section 26-502.D.3.c.l. (20% commercial landscaped coverage
requirement), a variance to Section 26-502.C.1. (maximum of 35% non-living landscaping), a
variance to Section 26-502.C.3.a. (commercial street tree requirement) and a variance to Section
26-502.C.3.b. (additional trees and shrubs required).
Staffhas the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district
in which it is located?
Request A: If the paving is required, the property owner will have to install hard
surfacing which will require the submission of a drainage plan and report including a
water quality basin. Given the small size of the property, it is questionable whether this
could be accommodated on site. If the variance is approved, staff will be recommending
that given the existing layout of the site, drainage improvements be analyzed and
installed to mitigate existing impacts to adjacent property owner.
Request B: If the landscaping variances are denied, the site layout would have to be
reconfigured to accommodate the additional landscaping space needed. The missing
plant materials would need to be added in the areas devoid ofliving materials (for
example, along the eastern property line and/or rear graveled area). The addition of plant
materials in these areas could conflict with recommended drainage improvements.
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
5
2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
Request A: If the paving variance is granted, it would not impact the essential character
of the area. There are numerous commercial properties in the area which have graveled
or recycled asphalt parking and drive areas.
Request B: Approval ofthe landscaping variances would also have minimal impact on
the area. Many of the existing commercial sites were developed or "commercialized"
under the 10% coverage requirement which changed in ZOO I. The existence of the
landscaped planter in the right-of-way gives the appearance oflandscaping on the
property.
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the
owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the
regulations were carried out?
Request A: The lot in question has a typical rectangular shape and slopes from northwest
to southeast. If the entire lot is paved, accommodation of the required drainage facilities
is questionable. According to the adjacent property owner, the improvements installed by
the applicant over the past five years have already impacted his property. While he does
not want additional paving on the property which will exacerbate the drainage concerns,
he would like to have some accommodation ofthe existing situation to lessen the impact
to his property.
Request B: There are no unique circumstances relative to shape of the site. There may
be additional room to add landscaping and increase the non-living materials by the
addition of more plant materials to existing graveled areas. Installation of plant materials
in these rock areas could conflict with drainage improvements. Staff would prefer to see
the island at the front upgraded as it is more visible than areas in the interior of the site.
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having
an interest in the property?
Requests A and B: The hardship has been created by the property owner who started
using the property commercially without completing the required commercial site and
building improvements.
5. Would the granting ofthe variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is
located, by, among other things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or
increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially
diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood?
Requests A and B: Granting of the variances would not be detrimental to the public
welfare. The paving and landscaped variances would not impact the adequate supply of
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
6
light and air to adjacent properties, would not increase the chance of fire or endanger the
public safety. There have already been negative drainage impacts on the property owner
to the south and east which must be mitigated.
There could be a negative impact on the neighborhood if the variances are not granted as
installation of additional improvements in the property could discourage the assemblage
of adjacent parcels for future redevelopment. It is clearly stated in the Northwest Subarea
Plan that interim uses without substantial monetary investment should be encouraged to
facilitate future redevelopment.
6. If criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished
from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the
variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
Requests A and B: The requested paving and landscaping variance would result in an
individual benefit for the property and would not result in the accommodation of a person
with disabilities. There may be a benefit to the neighborhood and the community if the
property were assembled with adjacent parcels and redeveloped. However, the property
owner must minimize the existing impacts to adjacent property through drainage
improvements as recommended by Staff in the recommended motions.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Request A:
Upon review of the request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the
commercial paving variance request. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following
reasons:
1.
2.
3.
4.
There will be no negative impact on the character ofthe area.
Granting of the paving variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare.
Granting of the paving variance would not impact the adequate supply oflight and
air to adjacent properties and would not increase the chance of fire or endanger the
public safety.
There could be a long-term negative impact on the neighborhood due to investment
in the property discouraging redevelopment.
With the following conditions:
I. The existing parking areas be striped as laid out by Staff on Exhibit I including the
handicapped loading space with freestanding sign. This must be cornpleted by
March 31, 2007.
2. The existing shed, vehicles and all other outside materials stored in the graveled
"landscaped "areas along the eastern property line and at the south end of the
property must be removed. This must be completed by February 28, 2007.
3. A professional engineer must be hired to perform an analysis of the existing
conditions on the site to determine what improvements could be made on the south
end of the property to relieve current impacts on the property to the east and south.
Board of Adjustment
Case No. W A-06-21/Wiedmaier
7
This analysis must be completed by February 28, 2007 and the required
improvements installed by March 31, 2007.
Request B:
Upon review of the request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the
landscaping variance requests. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following reasons:
1. There are will be no negative irnpact on the character of the area.
2. There are unique circumstances as an existing landscaped buffer is located in the
52nd Avenue right-of-way.
3. Granting of the landscape variances would not impact the adequate supply oflight
and air to adjacent properties and would not increase the chance of fire or endanger
the public safety.
4. The variances will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
properties or improvements in the neighborhood.
5. There could be a long-term negative impact on the neighborhood due to investment
in the property discouraging redevelopment.
With the following condition:
I. The property owner plant 15 5-gallon sized low growing deciduous shrubs in the
planter area in the front of the property. This is to be completed by March 31,
2007.
If any of the recommended improvements have not been completed within the timeframes
specified above, the former property owner will be summoned into court and Staff's
recommendation will be that it be converted back to a residential use.
Board of Adjustment
Case No. WA-06-21/Wiedmaier
8
III
~
"S
A
~ '\)
.
I'lI:lL
U)
,__ - -'c-,:
.
C''-'- ....'._.
'" ,,--,- .
:.,,;:..:..-.'.
W
3~
liT
Z"
Wp
>'''!'' .
.--r'" Q. .
."'- b'
r()
0,
OctO
ZZ
C"-J
LO
.j.i?
g
1
~
~:
...~~
"
" .
o
"
o
,
f- ,
-'
<<
'I
, "- ,
Ul
<<
,
,Gto' ...
o
o
~ .'
Oq .~.@,
to.: 'o:tJ
", ~ . ~
.
~ v' .
v." j;! .
~ ".
-'
o
~
~
[71
,~ ~!
'T l.lJ s:
III Ii
,- S:. 'd
')~ ~..~
w
>
a::
~
'"
2
'"
""
<c.
"-
01 G:l
>
...
'"
'"
.,>:'9Z
, .
..
~.
~
.
.
'"
..
'.0
,o'a
b
N
,l'tl (}..
2
<t
or
"".
~
o
0::
.
".
.
SJ
.
.
.~
, .
.
.:;=
'"
2
2
;:c
f-
W
""
W
o
3'
N
"
.I'H.
.n>1'
-
'"
.'Z
is
>- -'
ciS
~-o~_
UJ>-
""
:z.
'0'
Ul
-..:
::;
.~'~
~_ 0,:
,-~(j)
Ul O.
>-
;g~
<z
O::w
.<.>
~. o.l.
i....'.~
\l')3
,~ "
. 1. "
(J-:t
o
.
.w'
f-
l'lWV'
iY'-r
'VZ. _
~
.
..
o
.
<3
.
.
, .
, .
~z
OO'L C; l
, .
,
"'<<
0,
O-f/l
:-:b:::-.l
b
.0
, .
.
. .
, .
. I='
...
3"i7l,00000
.
q
N
,
f-
-'
0<(
.I
~. 0-
Ul
'<(
'0
~
o'
.,
,0
o
N
x
U.
I
Ul
<(
0::
f-
I
"
~
<0
X
"
2
o
..J
W
w
0::
f-
Ul
::>
o
::>
o
U
w
o
oi.
<(
15
W
""
3'
o
<.oJ
~-QJ
~~
-'CD
'-
:<:::;<
;'~W-
-,UU
z
'iC (d'
(>-0 c
,
o
rO
,.~
,'i.
o
o
,0
.
u>
o
o,~o
o -'
-'
o
CD
",0 0
,
;,.
"',
,'"
-1
,
, .
it;; '.
: ct,x .0
,_ <4-<( <:(-..
z.o .0...
01-;
o
,O'9J ,0'0 l
o
.
.. .
.
-'
,OO'LC; l 3"i7l,OOoOO N
"
.-
;r,
.0:5
~
<(
0::
o
f-
Ul
in
.~ N ;;r-
,..j r<i
l'OZ
,
, .
, .
.; <I Q
, .
, .
0
,
f- ',0
.oJ ,0 0
<(
I
"- '.0
W
<(
" 0
,0 0 .
, .
,1"09,
"
2
is
..J
5
>-CD
"",-
00
f- W
UlI
Ul
N
'"
2
<(
I
""
<.oJ
>
o
-'
<<
f-
<.oJ
::;
,
, .
..:'",
,
O'O~
If '
."1 ",
''0 oi
~w c\.I
'0:::"' 'I
" U:, ...."ll.,
0.2 ' '
'VO .
O' '..I
.~ __~ 'I
..:0."
: .~
~
-'
..
o
'"
G330 YIIVl:J lint>
06L1'160'] 'ON ':J3H
,1"09
,.
, .
,
tJ(
2
W
U.
Z
WW
00
0<(
0'-'
,<0
o
, f-
"'UJ
,
'.
, .
"
,o.-m
W
0::
~,
o
w
~'~
z-<('
:Jm
'-
2:;=
~-
:etr
Oz
<0
b
N
-'
W
>
'"
'"
-'
<(0
f-W
wI
::;Ul
, 'I
N
~
L()
r---
w
n
o
o
n
,
(J)
OJ
Z
EXHIBIT 1
~
..
..
~
<'l
:; ":%~;!'t,'f1:~~ ,~
~: ,',~:~~ .:-- ~
.~~: ~';-"~':
."
,-.- ",,-;'-fu,.t'f
-:~
.
"' .~_1
'.:'.':'
"jf,:~ ,~~~#:~i
"" .
;..#.,;.'
"'~;~
'~.' "..>:Jt'~' . '--;:. .~. .'
,.,. - ~~. ~ ... ""~, ",-
" ~ ",' 1 "'. _, ji1i-
. "::\{' ; ~..
.t;r: '"'
';l~) ':" .o~
,;
'- .~, ,:
."-----
':,,::'
,
f~. '-:~T-
t.;,
:; :.:: ~ ; ~~'-:~"'==:7~
<~->~
~
" -~ ~~'
{
1
-..,
IF-II A NC~IE'~ S
7"a +P,.f-' '$':r.~.et :1;O7"-~ c~s 7Y~~*.'"
- ,. ,. ..." --,'..;' ,.,
,"',-
B;;'f<:1?J: 1J.ia](L:~;:~ :~~~-
g UJ I~ Ipn\[,ll~U~6N\f;'T ~r:t..,it"..
~ _.' "~~~~,~:, ; . ~'.~.'" ",=:'":J~~ii:;~t~i'-
KHOV AU. HE.., ai- "rt4i:.~1t. P~~T~U. . 1"~~T ~tL )}~c;_""'-"G~-"'o. ....,..... TMC, o'oJ"Nc...i' ~~..--,.~~ !f~:if'"~~l~-~f:
~T_. ..tn_IE..V HE.loGU. .':".IN J. curP'&.Il.e>>oI_C~UI'4_TV lL"'ec..p~... Tt-fE. 6:A. '.. tIo'lj -:'.=t "~T T+f.Il.Rllt.CfI'"' t-t.AV,e.., '-"":.~o~~~. .'....}~r:.~~. '."".:'.'.'.
..c..s......O\~.~..O TMC. ~&. ,"TO. ~Lo.clC". LO"T.... TA~tI. .$1-1LU.~.l\Afl"!~T~ItL~..V. 5,.... Ave.N~" y~ .@o:~'l~~~'-~'
........& ~~..... ....'WD. ..<";"&"_& 0'" HANC.E. b ...!:tt.IaOtVI~\C:~,"". AN ~ -00 ......c...v. .G.~"'''' AKG c:o~~c:.r frill rfS.IIt.:_-~.H';~ftii-~.;frc~ ___._'_ _,
uc. U-..r-.-T""L A..o.......!oA-JD ..!!oTQ.&.~~~ A....O AVE.NU&."O ~c.......e....~,.. C~"T"'.__ '--':_' . ~ . X:_.'h-J;~~.;~',i::-:-'-:.~_'"
~c :j;;~ ~it~~:' }~~t~jtt~~~~t;~.
. A. " n ~. t' ..;~"ch~'fi~r~(f . ."
, ,
,::r
'-'f-
"
~
1
~
i' 'tJ.~(j.;a*an/Ji "
\-!'~~~t;.~ie
.
--",
- ""
~2~t"CT'~
COVENANT!t
i..",;;,iji._- _A:. i8' "
~
,t'.
,
,.
.~
,,?
N OT AR.V~
'"On
ll' ~
R-R
~g
r-t
~~
g.>-i
d
"'-!"T1-0
~ H
" ~ .... .....
n~8-:ll'
~.....g~
'" ~ r-t ~
e.~
en
n
p-'
o
e..
nO>-i
~ ::i. ~
~ g tE
r-t ......
~ r-t
0..
'"0
o
8.
'"
...
US'
c
iil
~
'"0
o
r-t
~
~
O.
ll'
......
~
;a.
~
iil
a.
!;
::>
a.
c:
..
co
;;:
..
."
....
....
\0
\0
<=
~
Ul
N
"
Q.
~
tl>
==
=
tl>
~
~. ?
~ g..d::r:~<
n ~ 0.. ~ ~ Qq' tt ~
en g 0.. Ul 0.. l!.. p-' '"' ll'
r-t ~ ~ l-J(1Q 0 d ~ \
El. ~"'~~'l:l~i3'T1
i-J. n R 0.. ~ i3 ~ ~
o o.~. > 0 r'> f!J. ~ 8
~ g~~~g~o..~
o
S
~
r-t
.....
o
~
o.~
(1 ~
~ ll'
~~
p. to
o ~
~ '"
Exhibit 4
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857
The City of
Wheat Ridge
January 16, 2007
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA-06-21 which is a request for approval of variances
to Section 26-501.D.1 (Parking Lot Paving) and Section 26-502 (Landscaping
Requirements) for property zoned Industrial (I) and located at 11990 W. 52nd Avenue.
This case will heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council
Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on
January 25, 2007, at 7:00 p.m.
As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing
and/or submit written comments.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning
Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
\\srv-ci-eng-OO 1 \users\kfield\Kathy\BOA \pubnotice\2007\wa0621 :wpd
.. .
WZ-83-5
. WZ-92-8
.
PID
JOLLY RANCHER INC.
..",.
. ~ ~ ~
~ iJ
~ C-2 I
'"
0;,; ~
(j)
1.1, 0'"
e)T /
O~ /0'"
~ -J17
9r0
NEI7
~ ~
I
PID
'WHEAT RIDGE
INDUSTRIALC NrERLTD.
WZ-80-29
WZ-97-11
MS-98-4
WZ-84-6
. ~ ~
.
. ~ ~
.
(f) ~
.
U ~ . . .
<( ~. . . ~
.
I
SUP.93-3
I
co
o's
~
-0;,;
.- (j)
--
,-
/
i
\
"
""'"
/
/
;
MOUNTAIN VISTA /
/'./
. .//
~-----'--P'CD
/
.-
/
~
~
I
/
;
/
;
/
WZ-7&.118
RETIREMENT cQMMUNI1Y ""
. v.-'19:{;SI(;//// /,/--;;;
0't\~.?>-/ \(0'1>-/---
." ~;0_'9--'"
~\t:;?~~"{j;-/
./ WZ-90-11
WZ-98-6
~
~
~
~
'/'~;';:;;;?~;:}~~;;~;~~
/// / -'_'-\l
/, 1/ f', \ \,\i.
II' -
\\i t',' L______..-l 1 I:; f
/,--
NE20
OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP
WHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
- PARCEULOT BOUNDARY
(DESIGINATES OWNERSHIP)
-.-.-. WATER FEATURE
. DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
~ 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
~ (APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
SE17
@
o 100 100 !>(XJ 400 f~~
DEPARTMENT OF
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
Last Revision: September 10, 2001
N,,*__~ _~_~cl! 1~~/7!':_~ feCoscan /
Owner :Hance Robert A
Site ,11818 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Mail ,11818 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Use :1112 Res/Improved Land
Bedrm:2 Bath,1.00 TotRm:
tov4-- ! (.J.-D/67
Jefferson (CO) ,----------------*
Parcel ,043694
Xfered :10/07/1980
7006 0100 0006 7650
6808
*-----------------------------
YB,1935 Pool, BldgSF,947 Ac,.45
MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ,----------------*
Parcel ,043701
7006 0100 0006 7650 6815
.L.....~~~
Phone ,303-940-1523
BldgSF, Ac, 9.56
Owner :Ward Road Storage LIe
Site :*00 Site Address*
Mail ,5025 Ward Rd Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Use :1129 Res/Improved Outbuilding Land
Bedrm, Bath, TotRm, YB,1950 Pool,
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner :Councilman Dan L
Site ,11995 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Mail ,11995 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Use :1112 Res,Improved Land
Bedrm, 2 Bath,1.00 TotRm,
(CO)
Parcel
Xfp.yp.n
7006 0100 0006 7650 6822
:----------------*
,043702
.1"10/1""/ /"'''''''.,
l:'llUH~
*----------------------------:
Owner :Wiedrnaier Alan
Site ,11990 W 52nd Ave Wheat
Mail ,11990 W 52nd Ave Wheat
Use :1112 Res,Improved Land
Bedrm:2 Bath,1.00 TotRm:
*-----------------------------
YB,1912 Pool,
MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Parcel
BldgSF,1,092 Ac,1.40
:----------------*
,043709
Ridge 80033
Ridge Co 80033
Yr,:::>Y'oOr'l
. (\'7 /'1'":1 I, aon
Owner :Valentino Emanuel J
Site ,12050 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Mail ,6892 Wright Ct Arvada Co 80004
Use :2112 Com/Improved Land
Bedrm, Bath, TotRm,2 YB,1948 Pool,
*----------------------------, MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Owner :Tcch Management LIc Parcel
Site ,12000 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered
Mail ,12000 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7006 0100 0006 7650 6853
Use :3112 Ind/Improved Land .J:'"uuut:::
Bedrm, Bath, TotRm, 1 YB,1997 Pool, BldgSF,2,400 Ac,.33
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Owner :Crawford Holding Corp Parcel :043926
Site :11950 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Yroyo~ .n~/n~/~^<"I~
Mail ,8295 Ralston Rd #300 Arvada Co 80002 7006 0100 0006 7650 6860
Use :1112 Res, Improved Land ~none
Bedrm,3 Bath,1.00 TotRm, YB,1947 Pool: BldgSF:1,262 Ac,.41
*----------------------------, MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ,----------------*
Owner ,Gilbert Donald G Parcel ,070659
Site : 11895 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Yrt::>.yo~ . <"In I.....'" ,.....,,~~
Mail ,11895 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7006 0100 0006 7650 6877
Use :1112 Res/Improved Land ~none
Bedrm, 2 Bath,1.00 TotRm, YB,1939 Pool, BldgSF,1,049 Ac,.50
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Owner :Aa Wholesale Storage Llc Parcel :176201
Site :12100 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Yroyt::>.~ .^~'''''',.....,,''''
Mail ,5040 Acoma St Denver Co 80216 7006 0100 0006 7650 6884
Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land ~none
Bedrm, Bath, TotRm, 2 YB,1985 Pool, BldgSF:44,118 Ac,1.47
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Owner ,Bailey Winnifred A Parcel ,180195
Site ,5222 union Ct #1 Arvada 80002 Xfered ,06/05/2003
Mail: 5222 Union Ct #1 Arvada Co 80002 7006 0100 0006 7650 6891
Use :1114 Res/Townhome/Improved Land
Bedrm:2 Bath,2.50 TotRm, YB,1984 Pool,
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Owner :Benallo Dean J/Piorena Li+ Parcel
Site ,5202 Union Ct #1 Arvada 80002 v~~~~~
Mail ,5202 Union Ct #1 Arvada Co 80002 7006
Use :1114 Res,Townhome,Improved Land Phone
Bedrm, 2 Bath,2.25 TotRm,
.t'Done
YB,1948 Pool, BldgSF:780 Ac,.26
MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :----------------*
Parcel :043826
XfRred ,10/20/1992
7006 0100 0006 7650 6846
7006 0100 0006 7650 6839
.l:'llUUt:::
BldgSF,2,224
Ac:.27
:----------------*
,043872
.o7/1'?/"Jnn"J
BldgSF,1,249
Ac,
:----------------*
,180205
.n~/?p./2005
0100 0006 7650 6907
AC'
Ay~
(CO)
Parcel
Xfered
7006
:----------------*
*- --------------------------: MetroScan /
Owner :Estates At Rainbow Ridge Ltd L
Site :11855 W 52nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Mail :4155 E Jewell Ave Denver Co 80222
Use :1112 Res/Improved Land
Bedrm:3 Bath:1.75 TotRm:
Jefferson
:193697
.Oq/?Q!1CC"J
oioo 0006 7650
6914
~ ~~'-'~J.'-
*----------------------------:
Owner :Hance Robert A
Site :*no sit Address*
Mail :11818 W 5 ve Wheat Ridge
Use :4131 A w And Hay Land
Bedrm: TotRm:
YB: 1972 Pool:
MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Parcel
Xfered
Price
Phone
BldgSF:
BldgSF:1,254
Ac:.37
:----------------*
:195508
:10/07/1980
Co 80033
YB:
Pool:
Ac:3.01
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Owner :Hideaway At Rainbow Ridge Condos Assn In Parcel
Site : *no Site Address* AI
Mail :13697 E Iliff Ave #6 Aurora Co 80014 \,(\'
Use :4151 Agr,Home Owner Association \J~
Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool:
*----------------------------: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Owner : Hideaway, At Rainbow Ridge Condo Assn Ine Parcel
Site :*no Site dr s* Xfered
Mail :13697 E 11' Ave #6 Aurora Co 80014 Price
Use :4151 Agrv orne wner Association Phone
Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF:
:----------------*
:200498
v.J::____ -,
7006 0100 0006 7650 6921
Phone
BldgSF:
Ac:.85
:----------------*
:200500
:06/29/1984
Ac:.69
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
Property appraisal system
Page 1 of 1
J General
. In forma tio n
1 OF 1
Schedule: 193697
Status: Active
Parcel ID: 39-171-05-002
Property Type: Residential
Print
Owner N
HANCE K
Property Address: 11855 W 52ND AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 1908
Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY
Neighborhood: 2320 - APPLERIDGE ESTATES, STANDLEY HEIGHTS, WR GARDN
Subdivision Name: 703400 - STANDLEY HEIGHTS
Block Lot IKey ISection Township IRange QuarterSection Land ~
0010 100F 117 3 169 NE 16291
Total 16291
Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Recepti(
03-19-1986 150,000 Warranty Deed - Joint Tenancy 8602871
03-16-1993 130,000 Warranty Deed 9303471
Assessor Parcel Maps Associated with Schedule
!llilj:)39-171. Rdf
Go to ASRin MaR for this Schedule
Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF's.
http://ww14.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displaygeneral.do ?sch= 193 697 &offset=O
1/16/2007
Robert Hance
11818 W 52ndAve
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Ward Road Storage LIc
5025 Ward Rd
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Alan Wiedmaier
11990 W 52nd Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Emanuel Valentino & Eileen Valentino
6892 Wright Ct
Arvada, CO 80004
Crawford Holding Corp
8295 Ralston Rd #300
Arvada, CO 80002
Donald Gilbert
11895 W 52ndAve
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Winnifred Bailey
5222 Union Ct #1
Arvada, CO 80002
Dean & Piorena BenalIo
Anthony BenalIo
5202 Union Ct #1
Arvada, CO 80002
Hideaway At Rainbow Ridge Condos Assn I
13697 E Iliff Ave #6
Aurora, CO 80014
Councilman Dan L & Councilman Heidi
11995 W 52ndAve
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Tcch Management LIc
12000 W 52nd Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Aa Wholesale Storage LIc & Redwood LIc
5040 Acoma St
Denver, CO 80216
Estates At Rainbow Ridge Ltd L
4155 E Jewell Ave
Denver, CO 80222
TownshljJC
I Ill'"
E..t d!ll"
I (102211
I , 05-153 E
I 109 71
~~ (109711
Si,,~dl"'W HllI"
^ / t1:
ff 05-002
I 3
I ~
I ~m
I ",N 16203'
!
(275 ') Q.'2B
Lake,Pond
River, Stream, Creek
Front Dimension
Edge of Pavement
! -
~ (53$1
00') tOLE:O ~) ;'D5-'J44"i
00' lllSZ6l
I 1-1!l1l>>
(106
05-058
- ~ -
05-114
~
"' ",00 10600
Iil>!il R
[10900') -'
~9~1W
0'''''
"
q
tJ!NrH
(150011
[9610')
,"'
(26202,
(80011
[7801')
(6132')
(10253')
(12822')
(6633')
(223B3')
05-016
05-008 05-008 ~!
~~ - -
{18111 (79311
50') (23913')
05-007
05-006
05-005
,\
./\
\
~ ~ 05-004 ~
~" . I. ·
-, ",-
. ,
(68M')
",,33
\
U(
33
(B072')
(1D201')
(127811
(291a8')
dlll"lfid Cir
\ i
J
'3 ~ - / 1'-'
x
5B')
58')
~~
05-009
9B1')
5452'
(240711
(15155')
[11702')
(17581'1
_ _ dl"'WHllli..
!
~ ~
H~"
05-013
05-013
05-013
(15600')
(15800')
05-013
(6031')
(8952') ~:;:.: (6031')
2n') (@;~)
(11952')
(17622')
~
05-002
(295731
05-003
(15750')
(15750')
l!
-
"
05-002
~- ~-
:::: 05-013 ~ ~
~
05-013
(15670')
(15670')
3
,
"
3
05-002
,m
29401')
(4Q51')
(15650')
I.IlS 99 ~
2573')
(32356')
05-002
"
S
-002
. .
~!
06-001
Silllndl"w Hili!!;
~
t\1,,'3~
, r"'V 1-1_
08-013
440B6'
17925')
17034'
04-001
(124a4')
(12484')
i
04-<)01
(12350')
(12350')
04-001
~
(12300')
(12350')
04-001
~
(12250')
(12200'HilID
- 04-001
-
[\2200')
112200')
04-001
S
(12150')
(\21'0')
04-001
~
[12080')
.(leo~1I
!
S
!
3
"
g
!
3
04-001
,
palM')
(20151
~~
08-<114
1975;
*******************************
*
Search Parameters
*
*******************************
* Jefferson (CO)
* 1/16/2007
* 11,54 AM
*
*
*
*******************************
Parcel Number.. .15
39 174 05 001
39 174 05 002
39 174 05 003
39 174 05 004
39 174 05 005
39 174 05 006
39 174 05 007
39 174 05 009
39 171 05 002
39 171 05 003
39 171 05 004
39 171 05 005
39 171 05 009
39 171 05 154
39 171 05 155
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on January 25, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested
citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following
petition shall be heard:
Case No. W A-06-21: An application filed by Alan Wiedmaier for approval of variances
to Section 26-50LD.1 (parking Lot Paving) and Section 26-502 (Landscaping
Requirements) for property zoned Industrial (1) and located at l1990 W. 52nd Avenue.
Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant
ATTEST:
Christa Jones, Acting City Clerk
To be published:
Date:
Wheat Ridge Transcript
January 11, 2007
POSTING CERTIFICATION
CASENO.LJ,4-0b~d- \ W\e.Q....u:cu-
I,
PLANNING COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One)
/- <J r- -07'
HEARlNGDATE: ".Lv _
4- L4-/!/ W ~ ec2 ~cJ' e..g-
(name)
1/ Y f? / W Lis;-, f)Li
. (address)
as the applicant for Case No. U) A -() 10-'-.:;:21 hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of
Public Hearing at. ({ 7 90
residing at
L) S':2./tcJ e. I
(l 0 cat ion)
on this .!:I-- day of :s- Ov 1'\ (A, ~/ , 20&, and do hereby certify that
.' . I
said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the
scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the
map below.
.' ,
Signature: ~ tJ~
NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the
applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Development.
RVADA
~ ~
A-
~
JOLLY RANCHER INC.
1
~ ~ .
-
~ . ~ ~
1
WZ-80-29
WZ-97-11 WZ-84-6
MS-98-4 P
WHEAT RIDGE ID
INDUSTRIAL eNTER LTD.
~
WZ-830S
WZ-92-8
\S) ~
.
U ~
<(
PID
~
~
Page 1 of 1
Meredith Reckert
From: Sally Payne
Sent: Wednesday, January 10. 2007 11 :12 AM
To: Meredith Reckert
Cc: Alan White
Subject: RE: variance request
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Red
Meredith,
I would agree this makes sense in terms of encouraging interim uses. Policies in the Plan state improvements
should not be located as to preclude the future development of planned roads, alleys and pathways. The lot is
located on 52nd Ave. which is designated as a major roadway providing access to the area proposed for the light
rail station. The Plan recommends future improvements to 52nd to accommodate the anticipated increase in
traffic generated by light rail. In addition, a major trail or pathway is proposed along 52nd to accommodate people
walking or biking to the school west of Ward Rd. and to provide access from major new development in Arvada
northeast of the subarea.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Sally
Sally Payne, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Wheat Ridge
Community Development Department
7500 W. 29 Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
303-235-2852
303-235-2857 FAX
From: Meredith Recker!
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 1 :33 PM
To: Sally'payne
Subject: variance request
Hi. Sally-
The property owner at 11990 W. 52nd Avenue is requesting variances to commercial parking lot paving and a
waiver to various sections of the commercial landscape regulations. The property in question is zoned I and was
converted from an existing house to an industrial use without getting the proper approvals and installing
upgrades. Since it is located in the Northwest Subarea plan, please respond accordingly. I like the idea of
encouraging this to be an interim use by variance to these improvements.
Thanks-
M
Meredith Reckert, AICP
Senior Planner
Wheat Ridge Community Development Department
Telephone: 303.235.2848
FAX: 303.235.2857
1/17/2007
Prop,'<iy appraisal system
Page 1 of 1
General
Information
1 OF 92 [\J~)<t
Sch~dule: 043709
Status: Active
ParcelID: 39-174-05-004
Property Type: Residential
Print
Property Address: 11990 W 52ND AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 2030
Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY
Neighborhood: 2320 - APPLE RIDGE ESTATES, STANDLEY HEIGHTS, WR GARDN
Subdivision Name: 703400 - STANDLEY HEIGHTS
Owner I
WIEDM,
Block Lot Key Section Township IRange QuarterSection Land"
0014 OOA 17 3 169 SE 11522
Total 11522
Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception
05-14-1990 0 Quit Claim Deed 9004_Q375
12-30-1998 119,800 Warranty Deed f0771655
06-21-1999 0 Quit Claim Deed F09n790
Assessor Parcel Maps Associated with Schedule
map3.g,t74J)df
Go to AspiO Map for this Schedule
Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF's.
http://wwl4.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=04 3709
l/9/2007
PropMy appraisal system
Page 1 of 1
Residential
Inventory
1 OF 92 Next
Schedule: 043709
Property Type RESID
Design: Ranch
Parcel ID: 39-174-05-004
Year Built: 1948
Property Address: 11990 W 52ND AVE
Adjusted Year Built: 1941
Improvement Number:
Item Qua I ity No.
MAIN FIREPLCE Fair 1
FULL BATH Fair 1
MAIN BEDROOM 2
Areas Quality Construction Sqft
DETACH GARAGE Average F 1830
FIRST FLOOR Fair F 780
DETACH GARAGE Fair F 324
Land Characteristics
Retail
http://ww14.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displayinventory.do?improvement= 1 &sch=043709
1/9/2007
'~.
,~,
->!t-
City of Wheat Ridg~ I
Department of Public Works
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
(303) 235-2864
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033
FAX (303) 235-2857
January 13, 2004
Alan Wiedmaier
M & W Glass
11990 West 52nd Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-2030
303.422.6993
Re: Building Permit Application
Dear Mr. Wiedmaier,
I have examined the material that you submitted to the City with your Building Permit Application.
Unfortunately your Building Permit Application cannot be processed by Public Works at this time. In
order for the Department of Public Works to review a commercial development Building Permit, certain
documents need to be submitted for review and approval. Please see the list below of the typical Public
Works requirements to be submitted prior to the commencement of Building Permit Application review:
2 Copies of the following shall be submitted for review and approval:
1. A Final Drainage Report and Plan (Please see attached sheets for Site Drainage Requirements).
2. Grading & Erosion Control Plan.
3. Construction plans for the proposed drainage facilities. Plans are to include all details necessary
for construction.
4. Proof of Ownership for the property, e.g., Warranty Deed, Title Commitment, etc.
5. Site Plan, which shall include the following:
a. 24" X 36" sheet format.
b. A Vicinity Map.
c. The boundary of the site described in bearings and distances, and existing and proposed
lot lines.
d. A Legal Description of the site, including tie(s) to the Section.
e. A Basis of Bearing statement.
f. Signed certification for the site map, from a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the
State of Colorado.
g. A scale and north arrow.
h. Date of map preparation and name & address of person who prepared map.
1. Location of 100-year floodplain, if applicable.
j. Existing and proposed contours at 2-ft intervals.
k. Adjacent street(s), including Right-of-Way width(s), name(s), ROW centerline(s).
I. Location of all existing & proposed easements and rights-of-way, fences, walls,
drainageways, ditches, buildings to be developed or retained on site.
Please Note:
. The Final Drainage Report & Plan, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and Construction
Plans will need to be signed and sealed by a Civil Engineer licensed in the State of
Colorado.
Application for GradinglLandfill Permit
Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Grading/Landfill Permit, along
with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at
the time of the Building Permit.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864.
Sincerely,
David F. Brossman, P.L.S.
Development Review Engineer
Cc: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager
Darin Morgan, Code Administrator
File
2
11990 W52nd Ave (Alan
WeidmaierLreviewl.ltr.doc
LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Phone (303) 235-2846
(Please print or type all infonnation)
w L/~fC
Zip 9!(Xi1?
Phonl<>J- Y PJ-S''' V
Fad--Vd~:;Y(ra
Owner
City
Address
State
Zip
Phone
Fax
Contact Address Phone
City State Zip Fax
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regardi.ng this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written
communication to applicant and owner.)
Location of reqnest (address):
. 990WS-
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
o Change of zone or zone conditions 0 Special Use Permit
o Consolidation Plat 0 Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
o Flood Plain Special Exception 0 Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
o Lot Line Adjustment 0 Right of Way Vacation
o Planned Building Group 0 Temporary Use, Building, Sign
o Site Development Plan approval ~Variance/Waiver (from Section )
o Other:
De
" V-C""'4
e..
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Number:
Current Zoning:
Current Use:
Size of Lot (acres or square footage):
Proposed Zoning:
Proposed Use:
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-a orney fromCZlhe :wne which fthis action on his behalf.
~~~.~. "/.
Signature of Applicant "'~ . . . .~<
Subscribe . w~ro~tlii~
. .
To be filled out by staff:
Date received /1/cJ--; /0 r
Comp Plan Desig.
Related Case No.
Fee $ 'fftJ tJY--jeCeipt No COJ-J.-./O/
Zonmg
Pre-App Mtg. Date
Case No. 1114-0(;-.-2/
Quarter Section MaP. ':fj: ~
Case Manager e e. .. ~
Case No.:
App: Last Name:
App: First Name:
Owner: Last Name:
Owner: First Name:
App Address:
City, State Zip:
App: Phone:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Owner Phone:
Project Address:
Street Name:
City/State, Zip:
Case Disposition:
Project Planner:
File Location:
Notes:
Follow-Up:
~
Shower Enclosures & Doors
Custom Cut Mirrors
Windows ~ New & Repair
Patio Doors - New & Repair
Screens- New & Repair
Table Tops
Shelves
Cabinet noo"
Heavy Equipment Glass
MisceUaneious Glass
Auto Glass
!wA0621
IwtEtc:lIllj;1i~~
IAlan
Isame
I
111481 W. 45th PI.
!wheat Ridge, CO 80033
1303482-5649
Isame
I
Isame
111990
!west 52nd Avenue
!wheat Ridge, CO 80033
IReckert
lA~t!Y_~
I
I
M&WGLASS
Glass!or Everybody!
Home. Business and Auto
Established 1992
11990 W. 52nd Avenue
Wheal Ridge, CO 80033
303.422.6993
Todd Books-Gen') Mgr
Cell: 303.995.8765
Fax: 303.422.0663
mw.gIass@yaboo.com
Quarter Section Map No.: ISEE
Related Cases: I
Case History:
ariances to Section
6-502, Landscaping and
ection 26.501.0.1,
urfacing . . .
Review Body:
APN:
IBOA: 1/25/07
P9-17 4-05-004
2nd Review Body:
2nd Review Date:
Decision-making Body:
Approval/Denial Date:
IBOA: 1/25/07
Reso/Ordinance No.:
Conditions of Approval:
District: IIV
Date Received: b1/2!/2006
Pre-App Date:
CITY OF WHEATRIDGE
11/27/0. 10:23 A~ cdb
~ & U Glass Inc.
RECEIPT NO:C022701
F~SD ZONING APPLICATIONF
zone
F~SD ZONING REI~DURSEnENT
zreim
PAynENT RECEIVED
CK 5048
TOTAL
A~OUNT
300.80
180.00
A~OUNT
480.00
480.00
;, 1"'" "
iL.
,'-" n r
:___..KC
(}
_I
r.--
L
"
;
,'"
IMPROVEMENT
SUR\1:EY
PLAT
PORTION OF LOT
IN THE SE
CITY OF WHEAT
STANDLEYHEIG!i,TS .SUBDIVISION
ONE-QUARTER OF SECTI:ON'17, T3S, R69W
RIDGE.,:STATE. OF COLORADO.
A
LOCATED
Vv F\LL_
V/.
D A
, ;
, n '1. J ,
, //; V ....; ........, I
,I '\\
,-..--..----.
r'\
'~'"--...-
.~~~
!)
14
/
/
2N .AVENUE
N 89Q30.0 HE 7 .12'
Nl 800,\ )
j ...:1 '.......
"
1287.20'
o
o ~ 0 ASPHALT ~ 0 0 /
o 0 / ~NCRETE PAD f'OR MAiLBOX
0- ..
t <l <1 . <i\
1" ~), . t-) ....-
~~: Tnl 1 Il i lit GRA lED DRAiN s;R;lTmTITTITITTl I
-- \ l(l f. <1 '1'0\ /
l .- \O'WV
I ~ v:
~ 'r
\ '. 4 d@
~ (-;\ 1 .~
\\:~ "~4J
\ ~/
It I
T\I... 49' H-- .<1d
1
RETAiNING W~u.
\ \ I
\ ~I ~ j i
'" \1 4
~I
o
o
"~~
~
t1
...~.--
'.;,IiI"'" .......
.0
~
i~//'//"'"
1 ,.... I J
L
C
L.
}-
Z
L~JJ
:2
iI
lC__)
<{
o
CL
(~
Z'
W
L-tJ
_.J
llJ
--
(Jf)
VJ
(~
6 J WOO[)EN
\
\
5.
~/
/",
T~ ~RIGATiON DITCH..
I _ ~ 42.0.:. ~
~
---~-;;:::
._'3
~';I """"\
..'0~ .\
w
w
- ~I . ~
41.~ ~l . !
I t' I --- GRAVELlpARKING/DRIVE~-~
.~ ( I
32.0' \ - ~I
D(~OR OVERH ANG " ',-- J
~ ~ " Xt ~ ,.~ ~ 18. O' co _ I
26.1' 1./ j .' \ ' SWINGlt~G
L./ . ~... - GA TES
.1 ~.
~~ ~----- (
I~ ~
(/:L
f .~
.L
~8RICK LA~JDSCAPE WALL
/(
'(
I)
o
0> ""
()
Q
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
.....
o
f'C)
o
o
o
o
(;.
o
o
a
.,.
~
...
~()
- \
---r
181
-...., ..."'...........
N 89-30.03"E
~
};
a
,Lj
a
,
II
, "l,j
<J
i.1 ......---...
LJ<1
~
<J
..
//1\
/'
I I
~4 '5
<J
..:~ I
v <1J-
4'
L.
4
LD
\.\ iJ
II t\ <J
\ r()~t -" ~---~
t 4 '"~, .C.,!<1:..1 t
i \ 41
~ \ l <
\ 4 A l"'\ A . ,..... " . Jr....
r~"'\'f!" l..I
11'1
II f <1 d
I . ! <:\ . '.c ''-CHIMNEY
I .114 ~A'~~
IJ~J 4 't ~IJ\
~-) .~
- . I t~:j.J<J~3 4. -
N
tl
~ ASPHALT 0
o I
t
i
\
L
1 STORY
f\1ASONRY BUILDING
0,4
t'") "
~
~
"f
......
...
~
't 4.0) 0
t')
t.
-1\
1""'.....,
j
7'
o
f"..
l
8" WI DE
CONCRETE ~~TRtF
\
24.~---:
eRA WL SP ACE
ENTRY DO~R
26.1 'C'~\ I
I ~~. E.~~f' ~
~~/ 01\
..., , 0
A 21 . 0' Q.
o 'l.)
~
l')
l
I .4
1
I
1 i
\ \ .4
II
II
I
}
'-
V' --
9.9'--7 1
OVERHANG
STORAGE BUILDING )~,
1 7'/
o
~
~
~
L I
!
I
o
"
......
L
o
0-
o
26.0)
o
"'-
o
<>
i
1
t
I
t
l
1 (3.4'
. -~1-2.5'
'- -~
\3.4'
9. 9~-...
o
(~
o
\
1
....
r-
2.7'; (0
o
o
o
o
L
<)
o
o
n
'- ...-/
~
1.5'---1", 1 I 0 0 0
~-15.4~-L..... I
r ~~ 0
I P '11 ._~- BOLLAt:<DS
1 ,7 . r 0
I \ 1 \~ / 0 0 0 0
I \ I \ \ o~ 0 0
I )~/l
no ~,c t tJ 0
~ t A~PHAti T ()
U) -:tr -\ 0
v/~ ANGtJ ~III 00 0
I 1 I
! , i !
I I \ \1
I J \ 11 ~
I D. \ II 0
! J I l t I
I )1' ~ \ ",,~I
I \ \ ~
f \ \ \.4
11 r
r . \ t 1
I \ \ .
1 \.\ I..
\, 4 L
)-f-
~l
~r"'''''' 1
, I
o
o
o
.Q
o
L
o
o
o
4
o
~
2 STORY
tv1ETf\L SHED /'BU
G
I
o
<D
i1
L I
I
I
I
I
L I
I r::
I
..... __ LL
~
o
.4
c
Q
a
~
o
o
o
o
~
14
o
-,----- ) .
z
. r--
L
L
a
6
~
I
j
I
I
I
!
I
1
,
CONeR r: g,
i
26 0). ,
1
~
<:
7 '"
'~
4
1
L
5'5' ~--,----~--30.4
'~~'. I' - · -. ~l -
. 7...;i ~ ..... 0.J -
,- .----~'.....
>1;-
~
L 39.1 j L. L t1
:J 'q . ----.....
to
~
,
6. CHAIN ~\
/TENCE W IBARBED WIRE 1
~.......
J
_ L.
AVEL
".
l'\,
SHED
II
.^
. 1 ,
/\
/7 1'\
^
/\
1\
, ,
o
/
/
()
N '89030~'03"t 1284.64'
-
y
t
I
~~
~.
~ ,r-O~ 1
",;'-
,,/
I /,
I
)(
""'-_.
(
o
o
'#
( I'---
L()
~
......
'"
~
~-
,/ "...
........
o
o
o
o
-~
//
"'---
","-
'.
<.
6) CHAiN LINK
~ENCE W/BAR8ED
I
~
J
~lIRE
!
f
I
I
I
O. 3'*
I
I I
I I
~. W I
IF I
0013' I
\~~---*
(
'f(l'
\
v....
f-....
/.
Y\.J
~
LE GAL D
CRIPTION'
EASTERLY CORNER
SEe j 7 ~ T35, R69Vi
FOUND BRASS CAP
IN RANGE BOX LS 13212,
THE EAST 69~63 T OF THE \A/EST 296.08 f tE t OF
THE NOR-rH 157 FEET OF LOT 14, ST A~JDLE\{ HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION
COUNTY OF JEFFER ,STATE OF COLORADO.
TOGETHER WITH:
l-HE EAST 5.49 FEET OF THE WEST 2 FEET OF
THE NORTH 157 FEET OF LOT 1 Sl~ANDLEY HEiGHTS SUBDIVISION
COUNTY OF lJEFFERSOt~t STATE OF COLORADO.
F*ROM CONeRE EAST CONCRETE FEN SHALL REMAIN PROPERTY
Of-- 11950 W. 52ND AVE. WHEA\T RiDGE, CO 80033.
DESCRIPTON NOTES:
TH DESCRIPTIOt~S ARE AS RECITED iN RECEPTtO~4
NO. F0771655 AND RECEPTION NO~ F0913790, RESPECTIVEL Y.
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
BEARIN ARE 8 UPON AN ASSU ED BEARING OF
N E ALOND THE NORTH LINE OF E 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 17.
GENERAL NOTES
1. THIS SURVEY
t40T ! NCLUDE A TI TLE SEARCH BY TH IS SURVEYOR TO DETERMINE;
A) ovmERSHIP Of TH TRACT OR VERIFICATION OF IPTION SHryh~;
B) THE POSSIBLE DISCREPANCIES OF THIS DESCHIPTrON WITH THAT OF ADdACENT TRACTS; J
C) :. ,...._.._ lS AND RIGHTS OF .WAY RECORD
THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING FENCES OR OTHER SIMILAR FEATURES DENOTING LINES OF POSSESSION IN THE VICINITY
OF Tt-iE PERIMETER Of THIS TRACT, THE PEHIMETE.R HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THIS DESCRIPTION, MAY INDICl.\TE
O~NERSHIP ACQUIRED OR LOST THROUGH THE METHOD OF ADVERSE POSSESSION OR BY OTHER UNWRITTEN MEANS.
AN ATTORNEY SHOULD BE CONSULTED REGARDING THIS ~~TTER.
3. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE PERSON ) ~~DIOR ENTITY(IES) N~AEO IN THE STATEMENT
HEREON. SAl STATEMENT DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PERSON( ) AND/OR ENTITY(IES) WlyTHOUT AN EXPRESS
RESTATEMENT BY THE SURVEYOR NAMING SAID PEASON(S) AND/OR ENTITY(IES}.
4. THE SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT DOES NOT IMPLY ANY EXPRESS WARRANTY GUARANTEE. IT IMPLIES THE SURVEY
WAS PERFORMED ACCORDING TO THE STANDAtiD Of CARE FOR PRACTICING SURVEY0t18 IN THIS AREA.
5. UNLESS THIS DRAWING HAS AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL IN GREEN INK, THIS SURVEY IS VOID.
6 EXCEPT AS SHOV~'N ON THE SURVEY j THEHE ARE NO VISIBLE EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY OF WHICH
THE trJnFR~" '~NF: HAS BEEN p,DV ISED.
7. EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY ~ THERE ARE NO OBSERVABLE, ABOVE GROUND ENCROAC~1MENTS (A) BY THE
IMPROVEMENTS ON THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY UPON ADJOINING PROPERTIES, STREETS OR ALLEYS, OR (B)BY
THE IMPROVEMENTS ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES STREETS OR ALLEYS UPON THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY.
8. THIS SURVEY WAS MADE ON THE GROUND ON NOVEMBER 3, 2006.
F>OS$IBLE , ENCROACHMENT;
NOTE: THE QUiT CLAIM DEED RECORDED IN RECEPTION NO. r091j/~U IS FOR lHE WESTERLY 5.49' Of THtS PROPERTY,
AND IS SHOWN HEREON. HOWEVER, SAiD QUIT CLAIM DEED CONTAINS THE HAND\\lRITTEN COMMENTf ItrnOM CONCRETE EAST CONCRETE
SHAll REMAIN PROPERTY OF 11950 W. 52ND AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE. CO 60033.# THE EAST FACE Of THE CONCRETE WALL
AS SHOWN HEREONj IS APPROXiMA TEL Y ON THE WESTERLY PROPERTY UNE AT tT'S NORTHERLY END, AND APPROXIMATELY 1.7- EASTERLY
OF THE IW'ESTERL Y PROPERTY UNE AT IrS SOUTHERLY END. nitS COULD REPRESENT AN ENCROACHMENT Of THE WALL AND FENCE ONTO THIS PROPERTY.
Sl'Arl1E1\tIENT
IERE8y STATE 0
BEHf\LF OF ALPHA & C)tv1F~ CONSUL TA~JTS) INC.,
WIED~~AIERj AT THIS DRA~VlNG
AN ACCURATE OF Tt-1E SUR
tv1 MY 51 OF THE DESCRIBED
L~~\I' <W;;"i\7~"\\'\\~\. ~ ~
l\~...
..........._-....-~~~~- , ~ oj .r ^ , ._ . ~~--
PROf- t:::i:::il SFJRvtYbR #~ 07~ 4
1
;:
'.. \ ~,
J Hi::'
1
j 1 f
1 .1
--'----I
I
0\
o 0 t
o I
o 1
o -1
o (1~ - ~I
.. CONA\.-REJE '. f
o -0 c:". 1.,t LONG X 6) HiGH TRASH FX
to Tf)A--?H I '+_____- ----
"('-*' . f F. ./
\ PAD II
1 1 t j
\ L L I 1
F~l_~ ,1 /--- --2' DlAM. DECIDUOUS TREE
V ~
000 0 ~ <3!1
c
i
t
! TR C ~v'\ [
':8' WV \lvl A. \/ A
r~E8AR TH
0734
Vv'A
~v1
'T BF~
T.l\G
DRAlf\~
D
Dl
tl, :... fA N
L '-
'- i.;._.
LJ
,Af r\J
;J Ti Li T1'
I
)
\
/ /
I I
"',; \,,,
i r\../~~
N
c: ~i ,A. j f'..~
L ! t'.~ K vV
I .r--. r-...
, ".j \.J
CH,AI
l~JK FX
,"";
~
10
5
t
o
40
i
i
I
I
( IN FEET )
1 inCh :.::: 10 ft.
!
I
I
jl
LIMITA-rION .'~' ACTIONS AGAINS1- [_AND SURVEYORS
NOllCE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW MUST COMMENCE ANY BASED UPON AN)
DEFECT IN THIS Wl THIN AFTER YOU fiRST _ SUCH DEFECT,
).
,
.'
I
t
~
j
~
~
'~
>
~
~
Cfj
E-4
Z
~
~
~
>
o
~
p..
~
~
r
~
:. ."'.
;. ..
;. " :::."
.
',,- ",
.. , >;-,
'.. '.' ,',"", , .'
'.' ;
.,~ :;." ':'" '.
<" " ' .' ',' ,
.. ; ,::::
<'t;, ','
.,: ..:.Y
.-,/}-,:, .
,,;:..
\
,r:.,
',' ':-< ..' 'f'
, : ;;,~.
'.'<~.~
..,,~ ."', '
'. '"':~''''''' .,:; I.
',"" ,;;1" ~;.; :~~. . '.,
.. ":~'"'' ":':.:, ;1':
~ '.,',
, ',..<: .: .
. '.:':' :. .' <: ',.', :"~.
" ;;:'~ i"'':~'' ,~
. .";, " ",:,',
" < \. ....'.{~
. <;< ' "
, I ;,.,.;t~~; "
. , .. .,\~
. ,/
" ...'... .. ,
:,(
. ,,,';
'.; > .'
'0:. ;:,
',::;;'
:.,
.. :,
;., ;;
,', :
,\,' y
, .:"
".::' ...
<'" ::?
. i ,/.t
:" ,,' ; \: J
. '. ;,:,,,
';'.;
..
. " -j ,'"
," ':;~i'i '
>;,
. ~ . "
, ,,;~.,:tl,'
"'~:.
~r~;,i.. :
j',!
;"."t::.;":
" .): ....
",:
::. "
/1',
.
.; ;'
.,' .< '. ,
';:},"::~::~; .~
: .~
..:,':.;' ..:,
.;'"
, . ",;: '
'.
;;.
.' , :: >' . jC'
.' '.". .;~..
"
,:: ..
, ;", ':" ,.; ./ "
" ":j:'t,/~; ~
. ."" " '" !~:;.'"
i >, .' ...r,v ; idfii' ,
:'...., 11)<'
,I : . ..'; ::;":F:~. :.:
" " :/; ':'. ,
..... . :, . ...r m :',~i' ..
;.>i)<<\ . . . :....:
;) ';7/ ':,,\.; " :,~'( :
;c',
" ~.
y, .,' Q~'
'.. .'+ / Iii ;':
/ ." ~;
'!:tn,:
":.' ,,' ..
.. ,>i;.;;;~~.
J';
.\;.
t
1
::> . ,;;:,
<. "'''' :,
. ; ,:;~/:';'
. :: ~.
. ...' .
, .,' : ,:
, ,'.
~. ~.':
g
},>.......
, .
7.'
. . "',:;
'.
:.i
d
,%
I
"J ",,!
t
z !
o
; Ii N
E ~ ci 8
I ~ ~:
l ~ u
Efiu M
~ ill'"
.. I
., ~ ~ ~
S oem
~I, .,
<> iIf'
z! 0 .~
i ! a,1
o ,flit
~ @ .~
.. It4
U
S
Ci ;:,
W "~."'"
% ,..'
~ ~
'. "
. :c,....
.~.
.':'0"
, ;, 'I
" ,0,'
,~
.. (f);',:',
,O"~,~:.
'% ".
, . I
;i
-1. ~
ai ....
'..~ ~.
w'
, ~'
ti' ~~:j
e. .....
, .~
.' "~.,
. tf) Z:,
W,'~'
0" [\Q;
.'::
00
~ '.
Z 8;
< ~ ~/ '. i~!.
::x:. ~: 101
.~ P:l M ..:till-
~. .'~ ~ ':;cml
< . .~fIl SM8'
o Z.'. '!i~
o 'J'
//
p '-.
///
L
~
w
><
:-x
~:
'\
)
~""~~,
'---"'-'''-
,_.-",,;"~;:;;;;-
"./.-~/,/"/"
~ ~ -\ I ~ J
~ ~ ~~vJ~ J~ ~ ~
o
A
,~.~
". --.
~/
/r "'~.
5
L_
==
I
C_)
~c{
LLJ
LLJ
.~~M.....J
[1J
~--
ell
(/~~)
c==)
("'.
· 1 -\ / ~
-4J _~V..J~
ON
N THE
ITY 0
OF LOT
SE ON
WHEA T
'il
I,r,)
o
<J
Hill lllllll
<1
(~,;\ J
'\ . ,. tJ)
,_/J
,~-
lJ
i~
" <:J
a
~~
~
4
~t
L
l
...
.. ....
1
L
1
L
L
~,----- )
~
. ~5. 5
mr
.~rN
~.
.--
"
~"~\
r~-'J" J
f\
24,'5:
L :!
~
d
Cl
smlP Illi I
\
}
,
18' OiAt.fETt~
........ ~. ~, ...-..""
~.9- 5U 03" ~~,
1....
1/
-i" ..., T ,-
J __ ~ -" ~
"
.,
7
~J
S AND LEY
-Q ARTER OF
RIDGE~ STATE
1
.-
-
..
42 "
~''-
c1
~.
~~----
(lO'
~ """
<:J
(]ft I t.
.....
.4
-~
\
-
"-
o
.d
{:'--c
"....."
""-'
CD
1C "l.
.....
---...
I
.-Y/
~"*
',,//
.() r~
;:;] .;::1
r-
tt)
5'----1",
A
.,..
STOR
^
1\
n;;;
..,
n ...J
x~
.-//)
;j t UK Y
Rlll! nl
............ -.....
.
)
..~ I
.~
A
L
t
E
7
1
~
t -
"
i.
t.
~
I
)
.~- "
1'.
L
)
) ~l
? 1
\L
i
)
k
:\
r'-J
V~) \
I
21.0.
<)
o
o
tl
~
.- i
-r
.
,--~~~J
r .<:;]
.r-
'"
~
d
.
EI
SE
o
/
/
o
n
..
...~ "
. .". i
)....,
~
"
11 r"'i!
LH 1
((
( )
~
<
,
..
(:~
.4
/ ",
....
~
CRt.~ TRlt-'
24" 4' --......
~
\
v
~
8 01 IA~ r')
(~-
~
l~tJE
.~ :;;
T , j'
-'
/
"
~
<
t3
",'"
(,
./ ~ --~_._~"
I'
\"9 O~ /:--
0' ~2$~ (
o~;; ~
~
o
~
CK t f t
L1
26~O , ,
1 - i
39 1
... L
~'
t
J
o
o
"\"""'>
~Er>,jLE
'X.i" ,.
"1"\ /\
/\
If\ (,
0(
<
~
k
/.
~
.
L
. DECIDUOL.J
\
\"'-/
"
~
D
A
/,
)(~
-'-'-"~ !
---
~.,.'
)~-
,,,/
/,
)(
~~
All.
(.
.\
,
.)<
\/
)<
~-
L ~
o.
r .
,
.,
-""'10-.
11
I~~
rllr
FEET
rttl
Jt:r r tK
TOlI~' H ~~~ WITH~
[JESCRIPTON
T~f
OFBEARINGS~
rttf
FEEl
IEF F ~RS_~
tA~i
CRlll
ORAD2L
I
\
'\" 2
~180
\\ ~
~~
l~; .
RESPE
NOT
T Nf':l 11rH=
StiR.\' E rvR ut I tJUklNt
V ;"'1 ""n IP
PO~~c.::. TR~ 1= y ",n.c 1 E S
:, ",-' _"....... IS
Ar'} I t\(" ~;~i
"\cvu v t". ~
UCAT I UNt.x.l:51 t NIJ
PtH 1,,~ETER
PEF~ IME T~R
F EM, TUR.... UtNO i H\lG
A\8LISHfD
Tfi '~.H ... C.~'~
AIIOHNt:Y
~JAltMtNi
Mi:1 V E RS c P l~';'~ r sc" ~ If-.J
~ t: ..aJ.~...,.. ..?\Jf',
i.\... 'f"\!\LU
Fl'CI I t~ T
v """'..n_ v",;;l I ON
DESeR IPTION
UNViH 1 I ! tN
VICINIty
... NL ~:A - ~
;:) A t f~t..N i
....rl> ~ .... """'>J
.:t lMtvf\VCYUh ;::'T,..,j~f'i~C:T41 uvcS l'4V! Mr'LT l~i~jA77."'%;_0~ .if"\! -,F'\I'Ii ;:;~ U-vMT""l;~-i..1- !_T IMnL:~~ T ~~ ,e~i:pHt~V
r \-1'" v ilv$i~~ 4 \z.J1 I\. A l\!L.l41"t..1 PRAtI TIC; 1 Nli SJR v'E f ORS
--_.._~ -
.!~L1I.W I'!..U...
'-" ... """
i INn FR ~ T r.JJf=n
. t:;At;tfJ!
1 t1l1!1
\:)
l~H __:S
POSSIBLE , ENe
IHI:.WH
H
,..-I"., ......""" .,....-"..,"'~"'" ""
~, _, _,_ 1.,,1 .,.,;!'..nll \, ;;;
~VI"i \t t: J vn
rEr;3Di'~ \ S )
ENTI TY (IES
ru:~ T r=; r N At ~ I i1NA Tilq, E
I~
ADvISED.
-- -:. . ,:_E
rl" ~.K !"\ r- ~ HUt' t: H ~ Y
f flY i Nt<ir'I1U~tH ! It5 :s I Htt: J:S
If-srI-{ K...t t"KUP'tH r y .
JUlNIN13 PHVf't;:H 11tS S IAteTS
..... ,.... .~--.
"J b- I U"-' .....
'~'L."~VL..f'r~~l t~9' j 19U
IN aim.....
u'" tU .;.: T
~t(O~tKIY
~UUIt1EKL
_ , I 50- k"'1
M'''' ~.rtNr:()U~EN T
T~S
f\t,rrU:;:>t.N' rNr;;:ID:~ME~
~ERr:ON I"'\~ ,vnIM.M
Wf~lFRI ~Kurt:.t(f T
STATEMENT
1 Or<
OPERTY,
Il
fll
DESCHltH:l)
Iilll ~~ \t~.\ 1 ~~
r} K (J ~ t.~ ~ t 0 ~J ".' ~~'"v~i:- "(UK
~
Jj
!,
;p1
C L
L...-L...-
I I
I r
\,J \/
1,\' /'\
/"',. """"
~ "-"
I
~
!
i
I
~
lI.l^""~, ~. -'-uv AI'TII'U.i
r1'1fun~._.... ..... "'" "I!' 'W ....,.0;1\ "rAn $ ~"" if"""."
OEfEC1EVEN~~WA ]:=, Af1'ER 'YO..!
MORE fH ANTE N YEARS FROM TH DA TEOf THE _"tif "'r\it SH~)WNH€REON.
iti
M.rr" 1AciNtA TFt y
sc
TDRS
DVECT, AN'
AST .cuNf:RFTF
i
;
. 'i.," '. i. ~;. "
...~..,.~~
,
t'F<\..JrtJ't t r
.
" <,~
t
~ I
Q
; Ii
E =
I ~4
:;.
~
~~ I
I... I tl
; OBi
1'1 I
I I 1
i
....
i!I
...
.,.
~
~~
<
.
.
;. .
.
I
.
o
u
.
I
M
.M
.i," ,
. ~ '..
. ,
.
~
.
-..
, '
.\.
..
; I
. ;<'
, .
...i.
':.;',:., .
. '
,
"
~/f
':
.
. . ....'
.
,,;'
:~
'. .
.
'.
"',
.
....:. .
.;
:i:;
"i"
,.:'
.,' "
\: :'7:,,/
(
.
/
'.
.:
;.
.....1
,
~
......
"
'. ""'! ,.".
"':
'i'
T i ..f;' fi;
, .. .? :;"
...
;.
"
"-~
; . .... . '/
.
:. .i' , .1'.
.),:.:;
<~:;
'.. . :<.,..<
.
':,(:'i;
,
!'. ;
;:
""
.: <~;{
:
;.';
'.
;'.
h".
~ :'.
~. ",
..
',.,'j
..':I':;';j
,',
'.,;
l:
. ....
'. .
.
, ., ;
>. ...,,!/
:. i,; !: ~
'.
:,,: ;i
..
" .
'..
~ ....
. .
"
,
;t:
· ..5) ::
. i:::;
,
.'
.t~
'. ;. ..