HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-07-11
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Community Development Director
CASE MANAGER: Travis Crane
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-07-l1/Levy
DATE OF MEETING: N/A
ACTION REQUESTED:
Request for a 7.5 foot side yard setback variance, and for a 7.5 foot rear
yard setback variance, and for a 200 square foot increase to a detached
garage for property located at 2801 Pierce Street and zoned Residential
One (R-l).
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2801 Pierce Street
APPLICANT (S):
OWNER (S):
Josh Levy
Same
APPROXIMATE AREA:
12,422 sq. ft. (0.28 acres)
PRESENT ZONING:
Residential One (R-l)
Jurisdiction
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make a
determination on this request.
Location Map
Subject Parcel
I. REQUEST
The property in question is located at 2801 Pierce Street. The applicant is requesting three separate
variances: a 7.5 foot side yard setback variance; and a 7.5 foot rear yard setback variance; and a 200
square foot variance to the required maximum for a detached garage in the R-l district (Exhibit 1,
Request). Each request will be analyzed separately.
Section 26-115 of the Code of Laws specifies that the Community Development Director may review
variance requests of up to 50 percent. The process starts with a ten-day posting period. If no objections
are received during this period, and the variance criteria are being met, the request may be approved
administratively without need for public hearing. The applicant is requesting three separate variances; all
of which are within the 50 percent threshold.
II. CASE ANALYSIS
The property is 12,422 square feet in size (approximately 0.28 acres), and currently contains a single-
family structure and detached garage. A site plan and building elevations plan have been submitted for
review (Exhibit 2, Site Plan). The R-l zone district requires a minimum lot size of 12,500 square feet and
a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The lot does not meet either of these standards. Further, the R-l zone
district requires a minimum 15 foot rear yard and side yard setback for all detached structures.
Request A: A 7.5 foot side vard setback variance for a detached l!aral!e. resultinl! in a 7.5 foot side
vard setback.
The applicant wishes to construct a new detached garage in the southwestern comer ofthe property. The
garage would be located 7.5 feet from the side (southern) property line. The R-l district requires a
minimum side yard setback of 15 feet for any detached structure.
Request B: A 7.5 foot rear vard setback variance for a detached l!aral!e. resultinl! in a 7.5 foot rear
vard setback.
The applicant wishes to construct a new detached garage in the southwestern comer of the property. The
garage would be located 7.5 feet from the rear (western) property line. The R-l district requires a
minimum side yard setback of 15 feet for any detached structure.
Request C: A 200 square foot iucrease to the maximum allowable size of a detached l!aral!e.
resultinl! in a 1.200 square foot l!aral!e.
The applicant wishes to construct a new 1,200 square foot detached garage. The maximum size of a
detached garage in the R-l district is 1,000 square feet. The garage would contain space for automobiles
and a workshop area.
IV. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Each request must be discussed separately, complete with separate motions. Staff has the following comments
regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
Request A: 7.5 Foot Side Yard Setback Variance
1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or
income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for
the district in which it is located.
Community Development Director
WA-07-11lLevy
2
If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The property
currently has a detached garage, albeit somewhat dilapidated. A new garage could be constructed
which meets the setback regulations.
2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
If the request were granted, the character of the locality would most likely not be altered. The
neighborhood is comprised mostly of single family structures and associated outbuildings. Many
of the existing outbuildings do not meet the current setback regulations. The setback regulations
were changed in 2003 for all zone districts, except the R-l district. The regulations were changed
to require a larger setback (10 feet) for taller detached structures. The R-l zone district did not
benefit from these changes.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this
application, which would not be possible without the variance.
The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property. The applicant would demolish
an existing dilapidated garage and would replace it with a new garage. The new location for the
garage would not comply with the existing setback regulations; however, a portion of the rear
yard would be preserved. Given the deficient lot width, it may be difficult to locate a conforming
garage in the rear yard. The house is located towards the north end of the lot. A conforming
garage would need to be located towards the northern end of the lot for turning radius purposes.
This would remove almost all open space in the rear yard, as the driveway would need to be
extended further north.
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the
owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the
regulations were carried out.
The lot is relatively flat, and does not have a unique shape. The lot is approximately 85 feet in
width; a standard lot in the R-l zone district is 100 feet. The deficient lot width directly relates to
the need for a decreased side yard setback.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently
having an interest in the property.
A person who has interest in the property has not created the hardship. The hardship stems from
the deficient lot width and lot size.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the
property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing
the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate
supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion
in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or
substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood.
The request would not be detrimental to the public welfare nor would it impair development of
adjacent properties. The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised as a result of
Community Development Director
WA-07-11lLevy
3
the request. The request would not increase congestion in the streets, nor increase the danger of
fire. The request would most likely not have an effect on property values in the neighborhood.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are
present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
Some of the adjacent lots in the neighborhood are deficient in width and size as well. Many ofthe
adjacent lots are also zoned R-l. The unique circumstances are not limited to this property, and
therefore granting the variance would not be out of character. There was one variance granted for
deficient lot width across Pierce Street in 1972. The variance allowed the construction of a single
family home, despite the deficient lot width.
8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person
with disabilities.
The request would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities.
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth
in the Architectural and Site Design Manual.
Single family homes are exempt from the requirements ofthe Manual.
Request B: 7.5 Foot Rear Yard Setback Variance
1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or
income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for
the district in which it is located.
If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The property
currently has a detached garage, albeit somewhat dilapidated. A new garage could be constructed
which meets the setback regulations.
2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
If the request were granted, the character of the locality would most likely not be altered. The
neighborhood is comprised mostly of single family structures and associated outbuildings. Many
of the existing outbuildings do not meet the current setback regulations. The setback regulations
were changed in 2003 for all zone districts, except the R-l district. The regulations were changed
to require a larger setback (10 feet) for taller detached structures. The R-l zone district did not
benefit from these changes.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this
application, which would not be possible without the variance.
The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property. The applicant would demolish
an existing dilapidated garage and would replace it with a new garage. The new location for the
garage would not comply with the existing setback regulations; however, a portion of the rear
yard would be preserved. Given the deficient lot width, it may be difficult to locate a conforming
garage in the rear yard. The house is located towards the north end of the lot. A conforming
garage would need to be located towards the northern end of the lot for turning radius purposes.
This would remove almost all open space in the rear yard, as the driveway would need to be
extended further north.
Community Development Director
WA-07-11lLevy
4
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the
owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the
regulations were carried out.
The lot is relatively flat, and does not have a unique shape. The lot is approximately 85 feet in
width; a standard lot in the R-l zone district is 100 feet. The deficient lot width directly relates to
the need for a decreased side yard setback.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently
having an interest in the property.
A person who has interest in the property has not created the hardship. The hardship stems from
the deficient lot width and lot size.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the
property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing
the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate
supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion
in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or
substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood.
The request would not be detrimental to the public welfare nor would it impair development of
adjacent properties. The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised as a result of
the request. The request would not increase congestion in the streets, nor increase the danger of
fire. The request would most likely not have an effect on property values in the neighborhood.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are
present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
Some of the adjacent lots in the neighborhood are deficient in width and size as well. Many of the
adjacent lots are also zoned R-l. The unique circumstances are not limited to this property, and
therefore granting the variance would not be out of character. There was one variance granted for
deficient lot width across Pierce Street in 1972. The variance allowed the construction of a single
family home, despite the deficient lot width.
8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person
with disabilities.
The request would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities.
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth
in the Architectural and Site Design Manual.
Single family homes are exempt from the requirements of the Manual.
Request C: Variance to Increase Maximum Size of Detached Garage
1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or
income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for
the district in which it is located.
Community Development Director
WA-07-11lLevy
5
The property could receive a reasonable return without the variance. A 1,000 square foot
detached garage is allowed in this zone district. The applicant could construct a smaller garage.
2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
Granting the variance would most likely not alter the character of the locality. The neighborhood
is comprised ofR-l and R-2 zoned properties. While the R-l zone district allows a maximum
detached garage of 1,000 square feet, the R-2 district allows the ability for a 2,000 square foot
garage. Additionally, there appear to be a few garages in the neighborhood which appear to be
larger than 1,000 square feet in size.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this
application, which would not be possible without the variance.
The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property. It should be noted that the
investment can occur without need for the variance. A smaller garage could be constructed which
does not violate the development standards of the R-l zoning district.
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the
owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the
regulations were carried out.
The property is rectangular in shape, and is relatively flat. The lot does not meet the minimum lot
size or width standards in the R-l zone district. The size and shape of the lot have no bearing on
this request.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently
having an interest in the property.
The property owner wishes to build a larger garage. It can be argued that the hardship is self
imposed.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the
property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing
the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate
supply oflight and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion
in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or
substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood.
The request would not be detrimental to the public welfare nor would it impair development of
adjacent properties. The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised as a result of
the request. The request would not increase congestion in the streets, nor increase the danger of
fire. The request would most likely not have an effect on property values in the neighborhood.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are
present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
The applicant wishes to increase the allowable size of a detached garage. While the deficient lot
width and lot size do not directly correlate to the request, it should be noted that there do appear
to be other garages in the neighborhood which exceed 1,000 square feet in size.
Community Development Director
WA-07-11lLevy
6
8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person
with disabilities.
The request would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities.
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth
in the Architectural and Site Design Manual.
Single family homes are exempt from the requirements of the Manual.
V. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff concludes that the variance requests should not have a negative effect on surrounding properties, and
that the requests are directly related to the sub-standard lot size in the zone district. Additionally, there are
many surrounding detached structures located within the required setback area on adjacent lots. Therefore,
staff recommends APPROVAL of Case No. WA-07-11 (A), (B) and (C). A separate determination is
required for each request, and the requests can be approved or denied independent of each other.
Request A: 7.5 Foot Side Yard Setback Variance
Staff concludes that the criteria are supportive of the variance request; therefore staff recommends approval
of Case No. W A-07-07 (A), a request for approval of a 7.5 foot side yard setback variance resulting in a 7.5
foot side yard setback for property located at 280 I Pierce Street, for the following reasons:
1. The reduced side yard setback would not be out of character with the neighborhood. Many adjacent
properties have detached structures which do not meet the current setback regulations.
2. The property does not meet the minimum lot width or lot size standards in the R-l zone district.
These deficiencies directly relate to the need for reduced side yard setback.
3. The request would not be detrimental to the public welfare, and would not, among others, impair
the adequate supply of light or air to adjacent properties.
Pursuant to Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, the Community Development Director has
the authority to make a decision on the variance request. The property has been properly posted and mailing
notices have been distributed. In recognition that there have been no protests registered within the ten-day
comment period, and based upon the above conclusions and evidence stated, variance Request "A" is
hereby approved.
o With Conditions
B(
;J/;.5/0 7
Date
Request B: 7.5 Foot Rear Yard Setback Variance
Staff concludes that the criteria are supportive of the variance request; therefore staff recommends approval
of Case No. WA-07-07 (B), a requestfor approval ofa 7.5 foot rear yard setback variance resulting in a 7.5
foot rear yard setback for property located at 280 I Pierce Street, for the following reasons:
1. The reduced side yard setback would not be out of character with the neighborhood. Many adjacent
properties have detached structures which do not meet the current setback regulations.
Community Development Director
WA-07-11lLevy
7
2. The property does not meet the minimum lot width or lot size standards in the R-l zone district.
These deficiencies directly relate to the need for reduced side yard setback.
3. The request would not be detrimental to the public welfare, and would not, among others, impair
the adequate supply of light or air to adjacent properties.
Pursuant to Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, the Community Development Director has
the authority to make a decision on the variance request. The property has been properly posted and mailing
notices have been distributed. In recognition that there have been no protests registered within the ten-day
comment period, and based upon the above conclusions and evidence stated, variance Request "B" is
hereby approved.
o
~
t')s/o I
Date
With Conditions
Request C: Variance to Increase the Maximum Size of Detached Garal!e
Staff concludes that the criteria are supportive of the variance request; therefore staff recommends approval
of Case No. W A-07-07 (c), a request for approval of a variance to allow an increase to the maximum size
of a detached garage for property located at 2801 Pierce Street, for the following reasons:
1. The request would not be out of character with the neighborhood. Many of the surrounding
properties have the ability to construct a garage in excess of 1,000 square feet, and at least one
garage on an adjacent property has a detached garage in excess of 1,000 square feet.
2. The request would not be detrimental to the public welfare, and would not, among others, impair
the adequate supply of light or air to adjacent properties.
3. A larger garage would eliminate the need for a storage shed on the property, thereby consolidating
outbuildings.
Pursuant to Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, the Community Development Director has
the authority to make a decision on the variance request. The property has been properly posted and mailing
notices have been distributed. In recognition that there have been no protests registered within the ten-day
comment period, and based upon the above conclusions and evidence stated, variance Request "c" is
hereby approved.
o With Conditions
l'tf
cf Js/o 7
Date
Community Development Director
WA-07-11/Levy
8
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857
The City of
Wheat Ridge
August 1, 2007
This is to inform you of Case No. W A-07-11, a request for approval to increase the
maximum size of a garage by 200 square feet, a 7.5 foot side yard setback variance and a
7.5 foot rear yard setback variance for a detached garage on property zoned Residential-
One (R-1) and located at 2801 Pierce Street.
The applicant is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than
a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need
for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adjacent property owners are
required to be notified of the request by certified mail.
If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you
would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00
p.m. on August 10,2007.
Thank you.
e:\planning\forms\zapubnot.wpd
!!fW2"J
'-
\
~
UJ
>-
UJ
:;;
UJ
<.)
-'
-'
I
z
~
<.)
NW26
I I ~I I~ ~I m.1 ~I ~I I
'~. ~ ~ ~~. ~IR-..~I ~' -~
. " " ," lc;irif5
;; . '-' - ,---- . . .
R-i ~ - - ~ ~ R-~,... ~' " " "
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W 31ST PL
". J----E i;; -"-- . " . "" I! " ~
~ . ". i ~ .~ ~ SUB ' ,
o ~ ~~ ~I_ - :e ~ ~Io "
g' L-.!:: ffi $\ :- i ~ ~ ~ g LL- ~n_,!' '"
'--------i ~'F--------oJ-----"f-'-'<I2;~~t;'--
~. ~ l\l @ ~ t> ~ 8 g
S ~ g '"_ I' > ~;::? . ~
~ '" -- gj!~ ~
~ ~ R- A~ ~ I S P ~ ~ R- A. ~.
W30TliAVE
R-2
. .
. .
-
~i;;~
~~ffi~
~~"
~~:
f---'! ·
~ ~
. .
. .
~
~ "
~ .
~ R-1 "
. ~
.
s" ~ ~
~ ;~;u: <~
~~~
s "
" I"-- U-l
~. IlL'
l\! 111 u..!'J
o .
. - - · i;;
"
w ~.
~ ill l!l
" "
. ~
"
~
~
\\)
'"
3::
<S)
/)
I '
_J
~
z
::>
o
'-'
z
o
~
w
u.
u.
W
~
Cl
W
~
o
0-
oc
o
'-'
z
Z
::>
CI1Y
HALL
~
~ '~
~~~~~
W LLvlA~"
. ~E U
"I ~ ~ ~
~ ~ .
R-2
W2TTHAVE
~ ~ 'm'~~ 'li .
..~.-~ ~~
~ ..J~ ~r--r~
~~"/2:0/~/';","Z'~ .~
D. .It-",J~. \ Q[
O~~ 1
l.) ~ 731~7273~~
>::- --... Ii ~
z. "
~~N 2613
'" ~ ~ il: iiJ. !!l' ~
E i:! <( N::l '" '!':i <'<
~
CUP.95-1
OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP
WHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
"I ,I "1.1 .1.1 .1 " 'iiil ~I ~I .1
--. "Sl ~ ~. ~. ".0 ~ i ~ ~ul~
--=:":::':'-1:::1.. .... - - '" <D <D
ill ...._, ~ :il
- ". $ - ~ Z. ::l ;;;
~ . -,-,-,~ ~ -
~ ~ ~ ,,;:; ~3i: -. /
~ ~ ~ ~ * C$r~ ~- ----- .----.~
~SU ~tl~ ~g .,'-
l>-"q~" "~O .~::cZ ~~
{lL~o ~~~ g" ~
{lLZ"" S~~ ~.'
IL '2' g ~ I'li ."". ~ ~ ; " . . / "
l!i 6;~Ut- ~
;; ~ ~ ~ h-"i ~.
"---Y "_
~ ~!- ",,""
~ ~"--
i ---J L
"- , ~
~. ~ ~ R-2
~. "'
. R711'F"i'_-"
" L NDINGS ;;
)RL
" /Ii.. 1 ~
ftALNYU~ W30THAVE
~I ~ .1 ~l ~ ~
....W3;THA~ ....lii~-
8 i lil 8~~ II
~ _H" - ~, '--
.... .... .... ....~fJ ---=
~ ~ g ~~::- ~
W"'HPL " -
~ ~1~1 2
~ ~ . .
.
-
~ ~ ~
~
. I .
~
---..::
.
"
W 27TH AVE
W. 29TH AVE.
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
, , ,
HAYWARD ~I ~I ~ ~ ,
PARK ~ ~ ~ ~
~
W 28TH AVE
~ ~
~
" ~
- ~,
~ ". Z
'.~ "UJ
~ORTEN E~ ~ ~
" R 2 \ \!l l!'l w lll--t:t:t-
- hO" ~ F
W2~ ~
1'-:'8 "8 !-S
~ sUB LK 2 ~ L:
O~TEI'JS N
~~~~~~ m~~
,~I~I~~
"'" Ic;llFlI
~, 12 ~I ~
~. ~ \ll ~
l!:\ u... ..
.T r__H~\S)
~;n.~.~ s~~ ~
,.~..
---- PARCEULOTBOUNDARY
(DESIGINATES OWNERSHIP)
------ WATER FEATURE
. DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
r-:--:l 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
~ (APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
DEPARTMENT OF
<:,0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
~I
',I;L
"" ""
~ ""
w~
,
Ii
~I
~ <; \\)
'"
UJ
~ ~m
. "
~ ~
~ Ii .
--
Ii ~R-ili l
:i;;:~M~!.-
;~I!:IlL~ ~
. ~ r:-
" .. ~
.~ R.i''::''
" '".!!.
L .~
. ~ .. I! 0
~ Ii-'
? ~ l
" Ii l
\ {Q/
<(\ F-:
~ Iii i
> "
~ ,
so"
~Ii
J~
~ '-
i:: ~ 8
~ '~IL
<0 i
"' ~
SE 26
@
o 100 200 :?OO 400 feel
MAP ADOPTED: June 15. 1994
Last Revision: September 10,2001
J1-~(bcJ -/7-0':<()
LEVY JOSHUA M /J I
2801 PIERCE ST \ \ \-..\V
WHEAT RIDGE CO~~
3<J-,;{rP 1- /7- LJ/r;
SZCZERBA GEORGE JR
SZCZERBA ERIN
6475 GRISTMILLRD
LINVILLE VA 22834 2416
,3 9~ cJ.0Cf -/7 - 0/3
KUMMERFELD JAMIE J
2840 QUAY ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
3c;~~bcf-/7 -6/..2-
COGDILL BRET
MORIN VICTORIA
2836 QUAY ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
31~;;Z0Cf~/7 -6//
PHILLIPS PATRICIA A
2830 QUAY ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
3q-;)~ef-/7-0c1 )
SELBY CLIFFORD A
SELBY JOY R
PENNINGTON LINDA J
5000 E ARAPAHOE RD
LITTLETON CO 80122 2302
3c;-d.S-3~/S--OI y
AREM TRUST
2850 PIERCE ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214
37-;;<[;]-/S-0/7
HANCOCK LAVERNE C
HANCOCK MARGARET
2860 PIERCE ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214
zJA--cJ7- / / J-~ 1--
7007 0220 0004 4828 0747
7007 0220 0004 4828 0730
7007 0220 0004 4828 0723
7007 0220 0004 4828 0716
7007 0220 0004 4828 0709
7007 0220 0004 4828 0693
7007 0220 0004 4828 0686
7007 0220 0004 4828
Ifc/m 1/1. A/ Or/-; C-L--
CD
e; ~ ~ tgJ \31 ~
@ <t (') ("oJ ~
@@ @ @
@ L!)
@
- ("oJ
~ > ~ ~
~
@ ~ @
@ a:
I@ ~
V ' (') w
("oJ o ill @ ...J
@
@
@ r-- @ @ 0
OJ ~
OJ
@ I Cl <
OJ , ,
.. , ~ M (') "
("oJ
@ ("oJ ~
@ ~ @
@ @
@)@
laaJ:\.S aOJa!d
"f. @ M <t\
l!) to .... CC Cl 0
N @ \
\ @ ~
@ @en @ @ @
@
~ . I
z '\ co @
~ :::l
en ;
8-gL- ...J
"f. <t M - N ~ \a: ::: 0 Cl CC ....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
l!) @ @ @
~ @ @
@ @ @\ @ @
0 @ @ @ 0~@
@ @ _ o::t 0
I @ <!l @
, "f.
N u.. , 0 N w @
0 N , N , , W
N N N ,
<t
"f. 2: l!) @
~ @ N M <tw ...,
OJ (J) to ....@ cc ,
, @ @ @ @ <t
~ @ 2: ai
I
I w :>
b: (J) @
8 I 0 0 0u..
:i: .,}
~@ OJ @
@ , @
to ~@
:2: 0)
,
, ~
~ N
"f. z N @
~
to ..J II)
Z N
@ W
l!) a:l ~ @
@ ::l 0 M @
0 @ca @ffl ~
, o :::l
~ z ~ a:
, en <t@ en
~
M @ @
<t
D. en
. w
"T" Q
~ ,,,
Residential Worksheet (SF/Duplex)
Submittal requirements:
Copy of Deed ~
Site Plan (to scale)
~
Elevations U--
Address: 2 &:ll
R0rc..e.. <;t ,
Zoning: 'f-. \
Lot Size: \2, t2Z
Use:
~S,.
Property in the flood plain? M 0
sq. ft.
Lot Width:
8S
ft.
Maximum Lot Coverage:
zs
%
3\oS.~
sq. ft.
Proposed Improvements:
House:
Addition to House:
*Shed:
Detached Garage: \ 200
Existing Improvement(s):
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
House: \ \31
Shed:
~ached Garage:
Other:
Total:
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
3100
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
Proposed Lot Coverage: (Total) Z\. l
2{,,51
%
Required Setbacks: FR So
Provided Setbacks: FR ~
N. S
S t'5 S IS R IS
S -/@ RS-
\(Z<\'MC('::.
'('Ge c:kd.
Maximum Height:
[S
IS
ft.
sq. ft.
ft.
Maximum Size: ~oc>a
Proposed Size: (~
sq. ft.
Proposed Height:
Access Notes
For one and two-family dwellings, the fIrst 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site
shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar materials.
For all uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer than 25' to any
property line, except when used as joint access for two or more lots.
In residential zone districts, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 feet in width.
One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the street accesses are at least 30 feet
apart, measured from the interior edges.
For all uses, one access point per property is permitted.
*Metal sheds in excess of 120 s.f. not allowed.
LandscaoinQ Notes
For one-and two-family dwellings, one tree for every 70 feet of street frontage is required.
100% of the front yard and 25% of the entire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance ofC.O.
Street trees required:
Street trees provided:
LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Phone (303) 235-2846
(please print or type all information)
.
'At'(.~ S+ .
Zip '15'a2.1 c.j
Address
State
'2.fo/
CoO
Phone 313. 110-6'41'
Fax
Owner
City
Address
State
Zip
Phone
Fax
Contact . S~ Address Phone
City State Zip Fax
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regardi.ng this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and writte(,!n
communication to applicant and owner.) . . . ". J ~ J CO -gO z}
. 2"'0 J ] A r JJ ~ V'J V1.o.oq I ,(..,
Location ofrequest (address): 0' 1-.::. c.~ . I
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
D Change of zone or zone conditions D Special Use Permit
D Consolidation Plat D Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
D Flood Plain Special Exception D Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
D Lot Line Adjustment D Right of Way Vacation
D Planned Building Group D Temporary Use, Building, Sign
D Site Development Plan approval IiVariance/Waiver (from Section )
D Other:
c
Detailed description of reqne
, .. ~..
I
.ftOoM IS~,,,,S
"Ie \"2.00, .,
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Number:
Current Zoning: 'It..l
Current Use: rtts'/Of./'.IT,l\\..
Size of Lot (acres or square footage): 11.1 (j1.Z V
Proposed Zoning: ~ ~~
Proposed Use:'b4.k d~tJ GM.A6t. R....'II~.'-i
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-attor y from the er which appro\( . on on his behalf.
.v.~~' '~'."'I....
Signature of Applic t -t:'. . . .,;';;;0
. tofn~l~~ay
To be filled out by staff:
Datereceived . 1/if /67
Camp Plan DeSlg.
Related Case No.
Fee ~~Re~tNo.c.:Omlt,
Zoning - / '
Pre-App Mtg. Date .
Case No. AJIJ.-{)J-/I
Quarter Section Map \;,"!ff'{,
Case Manager '7/\
Josh Levy
2801 Pierce Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80214
(303) 960-6419
Killian's Resubdivision, Lot 5
July 18, 2007
City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear board members,
I wish to make an improvement to my property by building a new garage. In order to
achieve maximum usage on my long, narrow property I will need some variances
made on the R1 zoned building requirements. The typical R1 property has a width of
at least 100' whereas mine measures in at 85'. The narrow nature of this R1 zoned
property creates a spacial hardship when wanting to make improvements without
eating up the majority of a very nice back yard. The current setback limit is 15' which
simply wouldn't make sense on this particular property. The majority of the properties
on my block have buildings that sit within 6' of the property line. If I were to build by the
standard it would simply look out of place and render a large chunk of my property as
useless.
The new design would cover a footprint of 1200 square feet with a dropped foundation
in the rear which will allow for ample storage and a nice craft spacelworkshop. I want
to stay here for a long time and have always dreamt of having a big garage where I
can work with my hands.
My understanding is that I will need variances made on three different standards;
1) Increase the size limit from 1000 sqm to 1200 sqm
2) Decrease the side setback limit from 15' down to 7.5'
3) Decrease the back setback limit from 15' down to 7.5'
If you notice any other areas in need of a variance please feel free to go ahead and
give me some clearance. I hope this process can go smoothly so I can get a good start
on it before I head back to work in the fall. Thank you for your consideration.
c
w
w
c
~
z
~
0::
~
b~
z;. .~
5D.
o~
U~
Q)N Q;
~.fQ Q)
-
-enc
o en !':'
....J~O>
_....0 .
:c-g.g
<(-'"
o ~O
. IDa
Wa;u
WOO'Q
~~Q)
fl::3:m
~~Ci5
1-::2 W r:::
..JO
en
. ~
c:2:&
'" <( '"
"'::>--,
1;:r:o
~ C/) >.
o-
w""") 5
0"00
~ffio
- '"
~o=
~co
'" -
- ~o
o "'",
>'00
ro 'C_CO
'O~~
:s..Q(.:i
COOo
NUCO
00-00
;SQ)O
Q) 15 af
""C:;:. 0>
(U UJ:2
E"Oa:
c_
- '" '"
0",,,,
wE.o:
w::>~
ON.
"'-
~c$
IO.b
1-:2:Cf)
dj-5 -E eo
GJ~ ~~"*
(f) a m 0.00
~ ~.g m -g
:C~(/)L.ro
S:2"u C cD c
We~:So
0::> "'= ~
L.LI en 0. ro ~
a:: -g Q) L."' Q)
Oro(1)~"'"
Z+-,Q)m-
=:a c.J:: L. 0
I .~ ;'$ ~
lLIQ)..owc
Z'-"'OC::l
'" c '" 0
0.0: "'.wU
'+- +-' ~ (1)
o ~"'O ro CD
EO~-c:S
:JqQ)cc
(/)0> (IJ._
Q)g5~OJ
:5 r-: o "w'!::
oc:o-c..cJ5
~coo
c f.f7 co.--c
.2 ........"oJ:: c:
mOOo arm
Q; c::: (f.) Q) 0)
<! .- c
:2..J "'0 C._
~-':g~~
00-- '" .
00 ~Q)2
co s.....J:: co
--0 (IJ+-':J
'OT-.oo:t::
c- _...... en
000'05-
L. 0 Q) >.
00 c ~ c:
..... roE(IJ
LZ L... '-_
0<( O)ij::.-..
..... rn C _ en
cO co 0 en 3:
~W..cO"'E.Q
0>0:: _""0 Q) 15
Q)O""OCE-
..s::za>CtlQ)OO
+-':J.g>>.> (IJ
roI<DQ)>e"O",
.0: - a.
-X;;:5E,s
:r:-Ci5 g 0'- t>
~ .Y. -,.C (f)
WOoQ5;t::::Q)
Cf)Z"'oo;;:"O
C/)~EcQ;.g
W--. (1)._ ~ m
Z-JL.ro-s...
1-0"''''(;)0
-IJ:: ro 0l(5
~1-_~..o.8U
c
o .
-- c
.!Q 0 0
-2': ~"O
"O",!,:,
-g~'O
en"'-
'" --, 0
0:::'00
(J) >.'0
1.6~C C CD
"'::>-
15=019
..J::<:UCf)
Q)JB~
.!Qq:: CIJ
~o-
>. o..~
c ~
ro""c Q) en
.~ ffi:e 8
~ '" c
o rn - co
- OJ 0 c:
a g~..... Q)
I.t) .- (I) c: t:::
o 0).- ~ ::J
co 5000>0-
..J- - +-' Q) 0-
N .25 ~:5~
o .9 -'0 ffi
00::> ~ ~ l... (/)
Q)Q)Q)-
o ..c"'C > c:
.....cQ)Q)
ID en -a; 0 E
0) ~ E23S
""C Q) CO._
~ ffi L.~-C
c: :> ~
ro Q) ""0 -c Q)
CD 1:: c: c:..c:
..c: ::J co m
::> o.~E]g
> a. Q) cD.....
of m-g-c:E
~ -g.(ij -c.~
..... co E @ -
Cf) JB~E~
~ 55 w"(ij.~
'" EC(3E
0:: m.Q ~ ~
:::~(I)o..
o -c lD cD "0
co ~ > G; lD
N Q) lD+-' C
..c: J.....s:.(ij
lD -0 - CJ)
..c:ccDJ....
+-'m;e~
~ -
~5~~
::J._..c: 0
g>~.2>..c
._ cD J.... m
en> -
-ccD2lD
c:J.....s:E
~~~.s
CU.....lD"O
:E-g:Effi
-~ '" 'iij.o;
n::: cD-c ...:
w.~ c: 0
I c m -
I- '(ij...:~
W-eo::J
(9"''''0-
o 0..Q3 lD
I- g.:E 0
en
'"
~
'"
..0
E
::>
c
"0
c
'"
(;)
@
-
en
,.,
..0
C
~
C
-'"
o
en
ro
en(U en ~ ID.~ uf ~
~55>oa.Q)'E.3
c en -00..0 E E !':' '"
CUL.:. (I) co._ C)C
C Q) U) (I) co
Q)o..cuQ)Q)enJ....o
-e "O(I)lD<l><l>
:J-g c.E-~..c::E"'O
a.m(1J c.....oc
0.. en Q).- :s2
'" (I) J.... J.... - >''''0
w J.....- c.. $: Q) c J....
~.ID~Q)~E:m~
.......c:(I):EcOJ....Q)
..c: en:.c '+-'- 0 Q) ro
::::E ~OID"'OE..c:
$: ~ Q)"'C 0 co$:
~~(()Q)cm\f.O-'+-
"o"'-cN'" -0
Q) C/) .-.....--
..cEe~'cQjmC/)
.C.- 0>_ ~ en E C
o..c: OJ (i3 c ~ 0
en J......c: :>.- C e:.p
(() 0..... >-'(ij-.2
-c'+'-..c:(/)oCJ)J....~
_ -......- '" ~ '" 00
....... L..'~ 0)..... co: Q) lD
~.s ..c:.rg.o1)L..
c: ""0 _ en ~ -c
"'OecwQ)"E""Oc
Q)o>COcQ)ctlCCO
.S:: Q) 0 Q):C L.. co en
CU ..... (/)._ C) Q) Q)
e>:E $ ~ ~ 0 Q) 0
co -c L.. 0.. Q) +-'..:= c
.ocO>Q)'+->" e!
0)<( m (/)~:t:=.~.o
> -cQ)cCsctlE
2 ~ c:E'-:E Q):::'l
coQ)co_""C:JEo
> C 0 c c::
en Q)'- m co m Q)
Q) L.. co ~Q)_ C/) _
C/).e e> Q) ......e: Q) (I)
'EC/)m.~-2:>..c:"E
Q.)c-c(i3OCO.....Q.)
J....Q)~""Cen-......E
0..._ C .0 -c cu U)
(/) CO "'0 (1J c..c: en
""0 en L.. C ~ ..... <D
'(ijmCJ(1Jt)m"'Oen
en "'0 ~ 0> Q.) L.. C en
CDccc1:g?ctlm
..c:mm=Q);> ~-
..... c co a. 0""0 C/)
O ~ Q) Q.) _o..'(ij Q)
.- > en 0> en x
....J 0> 0 C L..= m
o..c: 0 Q)::J::J ~_.....
IenenQ)~~.eoo
:.c<D..c",o.....mc..
o 0..... o..c: 0>0..
I- -"'0'" o.Q>E= OJ
$_oCJL..,-~o
0..... en Q)oo-c 0 C/)x
ZC~E(1Jo'+-.92Q)
<ee+::+::..co"'Oms..:
W CJ$S! <0 -c>ffi _<0
>",c.o:"O",oo en>",
Q)...... m J.... c
<(05 en+-'~..c (1).- 0
:r: "''''> cmJB
0'-..... CO>CO:
o+-'o..roC"Om'-..c:
1-5~:E8ffiE~$:
"0
C
'"
rn
c
o
'"
'"
c
'"
en
@
rn
c
o
t5
.C
en>.
~ ~
o~
- -
-"E
00
.~o
..0'"
::> ~
eno
~,.,
'" '"
'" ;;:
,.,-
o
-
C.l!l
"'.0:
::>",
g'c
en "0
..oc
::> '"
en en
-
"oc
c '"
'" E
~ '"
'" en
~m
-
'Eg-
@ 0
~ x
::> '"
0"0
'" C
.0:'"
-"0
~ ~
s8
en @
~o
J9$
_c
'" '"
~ c
'" '"
c >
'" 0
"'0
'" ~
.0:0
-c
.~ 0
~
en '"
3l0.
-E ~
~ g;
A.'"
"0"0
'" C
C '"
O(ij_
e>cu
"'-
-9~
g;'co
0'"
..0'"
"'rn
'" c
..cO) s..:
.....-00 m
o (IJ :;
z'" '"
w"O C
U. c 'Ci)
w'" '"
o ~ :E
a: -0; . ~
w..co ~
> (/) Q) :::'l
w:.c Q; a.
a::: -..c: Q)
0(1)..... ..c:
1.1..21:: .....
o c ~ ~
Z!':'''' ::>
<( C) c -a.
'" '"
I- ..c '- Q)
z..... 0 ..c
<('0 OJ ~
0:::: cO '"0
n::: o.r::. :J
<( -00;;: (3
5: m1? .!:
en-
~ ~:r
"'- '"
..0_
=mO
jg~~
en '" ::>
~"'''''
o a...
c"'OJQ
'" c 00
~ '" c
"'_ 0
",_!!1 ~
.0:::>",
I- 0- a.
'"
..0
ro
.0:
00
~
'"
"0
C
'"
'"
,.,
c
'"
o
'"
en
::>
'"
.0:
-
"0
C
'"
ro u:
..c: ~ 0
en '" W
~"O a:
'" c W
..0",
E '" :r:
~'iij ~
~ 0 Cf)
"'- Cf)
"3 Q) ill
g:c z
._ m I-
(/).2 -
'" c. ~
.o:o.Z
I- '" _
oj
>
o
..0
'"
.0:
t
.E
-
'"
en
'"
1ii
"0
'"
.0:
-
C
o
"0
'"
'"
"0
en
:c
-
"0
$
::>
o
'"
x
'"
en
'"
.0:
~
o
-
c
!':'
'"
'"
.0:
-
'"
a.
~
do
:c
'"
U
u.i
'"
c
-c
'"
.0:
-
'"
::<:
'"
-'"
~~
.0:
'"
U
u.i
'"
c
"C
'"
.0:
1ii
o
"0
!':'
o
<5
U
LL
o
W
~
Cf)
c
o
~
&
'"
--,
LL
o
>-
I-
Z
::>
o
o
"'=
.0: --
_.0:
'"
roU
.0: .
-w
~'"
tC
Q)'C
0'"
,.,:S
..0'"
"'::<:
~
"',.,
.0:..0
o -
"O~
-0
a=;N
'"' .
-- ,.,
~-
;;:-=!
g;15
0,.,
..0",
"'"0
"@:5
,<=CO
",N
-en
"'--
_.0:
Cf)-
"0'"
C E
'" '"
;;;.~
c~
5..0
U"O
'" '"
.0:'"
_"0
_2
0;;:
00
.- c .
:O.Y .
::> 0 '"
a..m..9-
o
...en>
<--'" ,
J9$:=
0_.0:
zC'"
"'U
'" E .
.::>W
e!J:; (1)
"Oenc
m.~.c
f- C)~
>=::s:. ro
= 8,::<:
.- Q) m
--,~-"
_-s"c
o
o
~g~
0000
<(::>-'
1-0-0
>-U
. 0:: LL
>-<(0
-ll-cu
-l01-
-2<(
..., I-
Cf)
ro
'"
00
ro
.0
15
"0
C
ro
"0
c
'"
.0:
,.,
E
00
00
'"
c
-
:;:
o
-
~
"0
'"
I-
r:
'"
c
=e
o
o
@
~
'"
~
--,
<:>
~
cD
-
Iii
-.
l!!
!
"
o
-gj
-8
E
8
~
rn
~
"C
-s;
'6
e-
o
w
w
o
>-
I-
Z
<i
<to
<to
<i
~
..J
<i
~
:::;: 0
N 5'
~o
;!~
o
o I-
Z..J
~ :3
u: Cl
5'
@~
c:
o
~Q;
Q.E
'i: .s
l.) '"
tIl "
Qll.)
C~
."
lll-/l
0):;
Ql 0
...JD:.
Zz
90
(f)(f)0
~a:o
2:w<
OLLa:
aJLLO
::Jw-.J
(f),o
~LLU
(f)OLL
Z>-O
1.O<f--W
. ::JZf--
~ ::J<
odol-
-.J::<:U(f)
133CJ1S 3JCJ3[d
.58
I I _58 W
I I -.J
X
I I <
I I
I I
I I
I I
I W I
I > I
I I
I 0::: I
I 0 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--"""1-_ ..J I
31.i" ~ I
l!i 7.5' r - - L_-1
;:- -,
>- -~ I I
O:::w
-0:;: I I
'r 1SI1-< lf1 I I
~ N ~(f)0::: r..: I I :!
(Y) "_LL -
ill I I ill
::!: 23_i" 0'> I I ::!:
15.5' tg
-~
COVERED
I CONCRETE I
L_______J
..,
I
I
r J
I
I
[8.r
W
Wl:)
:;:<
<a:
a:<
LLl:)
18.1'
;.....
csi
N
W
U
Z
W
LL
;.....
csi
N
_20-58
--...J
:t
~ ~
o
z
cj oE
~ 00
..~ CX? Co!
C)nscoC"ltn
~~~S;.=
>(I)OI~
WCIloo:;li::
>EOM::l
a:<(o~U>
:J.t: ....... CD
UJ-s:::: c
wgoo:C
~(J)d;gE
COM'EC?..2
:;;:.....- NO
:JI,()..J.......U
...J..... ct> i.
o M
o g
-
"
..
"
CJJ
W
I-
<C
U
LL
I-
0:::
W
U
Z Z
o ~
i= a:
<C ~
U.Elt
0] ...,
-1"'u.
0.0
I- *- >-
Z",I-
W"'Z
~ ~
~20
W~O
>'2
O~
o:::,g
a.l3
...,.2
0=::"
~
E
~
>
o
C.
-~
'"
;S
0;
;;
-'"
'2
~
..,
>-
.0
~
~
.c
~
o
:;;
0;
.c
<5
5
c;
o
!2
'5
~
.,;
u
o
J'>
'0
1"
m
E
.c
_0
:c
J'l
o
m
m
E
.E
o
o
~
o
~
-~
2;
m
~
Q
<5
o
_0
o
o
00
ro .-
_m
~~
mm
uE
~ro
-.c
.-
u~
~O
~~
m~
.c$
=6.~
0~
Q) .5
"i::w
1':ro
0-
o~
om
~~
mm
Eqj
om
._ 0
E-
";: ~
>~
~61
g:~-ci
~~~
'" '" 0
qj~o..
o ro m
:Ba~
m m
2~iif
Sme
Ero
Z-m~
~e~
~0
liE.....
::r- 0
x~ffi
m0~
"":Q)>-
~.~ c
~Ero
rom~
~~o
"0 a.'c
@~~
0";:: ~
0U~
m0~
~mo
m" ~
> m 0
.&:5"00
ro00
III Rg
Eo_
lS.s 53
<J) 53 E
'EE~
m.c ro
Eum
m"'>
>Ec:
ego
.~~.~
m00
.cm-
_~o
m:~
.c~o
i-J?~
t::::":;:
m '" m
u.c_
~- 0
€~~
.a2~
_0'"
ro
E
~
o
'"
ro
"-
>
m
~
o
o
1"
m
E
m
>
e
~
.s
o
ro
"-
"
~
o
o
"w
om
~~
"'-
_0
om
o E
.~ ~
:=:e
~.~
o
~
"'-
!<l>
o~
m~
Em
1Il:2
0>
"'0
m~
-~
00
~.Q
~ro
~E
"'~
o
~-
c.5
"'>
~~
m~
"m
"'-
"-~
~o
"'-
m
wm-ci
b ~~
z"'o
0"';
,*.ei:l
~~*
~~~
g.~ ~
niBS",:
~g~~
.D.!!! 8 <I>
<:::"0="<::
~~~~
~6~~
g>>-oQ>
-:n 0.;0
~'fa.g~
"'''''''....
g ~~ ~
E i=::
E....~O
8=~.JY
u>~ ~{g
eh: ~~
5,* g. ~
i'~-g~
o8~~
~,g.~ ~
88~-;;
.e:;E ~5
.~E ~l15
'E~EE
~K"E-g
<CEwg
i~!i
I-
W
W
a:
I-
en
W
o
a:
w
c::
'"
'"
o
o
....
....
o
M
~
o
00
N
en
en
~ ~
>>"0
::l "0
1lI<(
o
o ~
'" CIl
-"0
- ~
i=o
2801 Pierce Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80214
Plans for new datached garage
7.5'
lO
l'--
85'
current property
X .
t
r---,
-" ..
"
New Detached Garage
r
:j
I
I
15' Roof
25' x 48' (1200 sq/ft)
plumbing
electrical
split level
Finish to match house
2801 Pierce Street
Wheat Ridge, CO
Owner: Josh Levy
303-960-6419
""'<',.
-;'-',
~1
~//
,
"'-
"
lee:!
09
- -
017
01:
o O. 01:
N
V
Case No.:
App: Last Name:
App: First Name:
Owner: Last Name:
Owner: First Name:
App Address:
City, State Zip:
App: Phone:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Owner Phone:
Project Address:
Street Name:
City/State, Zip:
Case Disposition:
Project Planner:
File Location:
Notes:
Follow-Up:
!wA0711
IL~vy .~___
(Jo~h .
~~~,~" "~~''".. ,
I
12801 Pierce 51.
!wheat Ridge, CO 80214
1303-960-619
Isame
I
Isa_rt1~
12801
1,~J~Xc;!.~,~r~~~
!wheatRidge, CO 80214
\Tietz
lA_~tiY~
I
I
Quarter Section Map No.: I~_~?,~
Related Cases: L~""
Case History:
.5 side & rear yard
ariances (50%) . . .
Review Body:
APN:
I1<tI.rt1.
139-264-17-020
I
I
I
I
L
2nd Review Body:
2nd Review Date:
Decision-making Body:
Approval/Denial Date:
Reso/Ordinance No.:
Conditions of Approval:
District: It..,"w.
Date Received: 17l1..~/:!.00L__
Pre-App Date: L.....
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
0mB/07 4:09 PM CDB
JOSHUA M LEVY
RECEIPT NO:C024016
FMSD ZONING APPLICATION F
ZONE
PAYMENT RECEIVED
CK 1250
TOTAL
AMOUNT
200.00
AMOUNT
200.00
200.00
----------------------------------------