The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWA-14-16City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W 29"' Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 301235,2846 F: 303,2351857 James Zieger • Simms St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 wmmm� 1. The property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use without the variance. 2. The investment allowed by the variances would not be substantial. 3. The physical surrounding and situation of the property result in an inconvenience, but not a hardship. 4. The alleged hardship was created by a person presently having interest in the property. With the following condition: 1. A 30 -day window for removal of the structure. q Please feel free to coL#3,j I Enclosures: Certificates of Resolution Draft of Minutes cc: WA -14-16 (case file) alymro- wwwxf.wheatridge.co.us 1, Kim Waggoner, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 22nd day January 2015. CASE NO: WA -14-16 APPLICANT'S NAME: James and Georganne Zeiger WHEREAS, application Case No. WA -14-16 was not eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for may not be granted without detriment to •the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing and City of Wheat Ridge NOW, THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA - 14 -14 be, and hereby is DENIED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A lot coverage variance and a 1 0 -foot side setback variance (100%) from the I 0 -foot standard resulting in a 0 -foot side setback for an existing attached carport. 1. The property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use without the variance. 2. The investment allowed by the variances would not be substantial. 3. The physical surrounding and situation of the property result in an inconvenience, but not a hardship. 4. The alleged hardship was created by a person presently having interest in the property. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. A 30 -day window for removal of the structure. VOTE: YES: PAGE, KUNTZ, ABBOTT, BELL, BANGHART, HOVLAND, BRADFORD and GRIFFETH NO: ABSENT: GRIEGO Board of Adjustment Page 1 ADOPTED and made effective this 22nd day of —SOLember 2014. Thomas Abba Chair Board of Adjustment =.11gonawl .......... 0 1.' 11 1 .- EM IM C' ty of \/V at 1 -<id - �V ge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Minutes of Meeting January 22, 2015 CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair ABBOTT at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29"' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2. ROLL CALL Board Members Present: Im 01 Alternates Present: Paul Hovland David Kuntz Betty Jo Page Thomas Abbott Dan Bradford Michael Gfiffeth ,te, Planner 11 Reckert, Sr. Planner ,goner, Recording Secretary A. Case No. WA -14-16: An application filed by James and Georganne Zeiger for approval of an 8.6% lot coverage variance and a 10 -foot side setback variance (100%) from the 10 -foot standard resulting in 38.6% lot coverage and a 0 -foot side setback for an existing attached carport. The case was presented by Sara White. She entered the contents of the case file and packet materials, the zoning ordinance and the digital presentation into the record. She stated all appropriate notification and posting requirements have been met and advised the board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She provided copies of Board of Adjustment Minutes January 22, 2015 additional letters of support that were received after the staff report had been completed and delivered to the Board Members. She reviewed the digital presentation, Chair ABBOTT asked if the names from the letters of support were cross referenced with the petition, Ms. White replied no. Board Member KUNTZ inquired how the City received the complaint. Ms. White stated the city received an anonymous verbal complaint and the applicant came to the Planning/Zoning office after being notified by the subdivision's Homeowners Association (110A), Included in the BOA packet was an aW applicant's response to the variance evz applicant stated it was the intent of the I adjacent to the garage, Chair ABBOTT or the City. Ms. kite replied the City vehicles on private property. They ma) setback requirements. There are rear y-, pen-nitted but the existing structure was provisions are city-wide; there were no the subject subdivision. nt marked as Exhibit 7 which is the in criteria. In regard to Exhibit 7, the �r to provide additional RV parking I if this was approved by the developer allows storage of two recreational ored within the side yard with no back requirements. RV parking is pproved by the City. The RV parking oval RV parking provisions as part of Board Member BAIL GFIART asked if the parking pad counted as building coverage. Ms. White replied the pad does not count toward the building coverage. It does apply when it a roof is added to the structure, Board Member GRIFFETH inquired ]low many situations like this exist in the City. Ms. White replied the City does not have an official count. Ms. Reckert stated it is frequently seen with storage sheds as they do not require a permit if they are less than 120 square feet in size. Board Member GRIFFETH asked what the applicant would need to do if the valiance is approved. M. White replied the applicant would need to submit engineered plans to the building department for a building permit. Ms. Reckert stated the fees may be doubled since the structure was built prior to submitting plans. Board Member BANGHART queried if the variance would still be heard by the Board of Adjustment if a permit was issued, Ms. White stated a variance would need to be approved by the BOA before a building permit could be issued as the applicant is requesting a 100% variance, greater than what is allowed to be approved administratively. Board Member KU TZ inquired if precedence is being set if the Board of Adjustment approves the variance. Ms. White stated the Board reviews cases based on the individual merits of each case, so there would be no precedence established. Board of Adjustment Minutes January 22, 2015 2 Chair ABBOTT directed the members to state any unique attributes (if any are found) ill the motion. Chair ABBOTT asked if the subdivision has all FIOA and if so, does it require input for the structure. Ms. White replied there is an HOA. They sent a letter to the applicant asking the applicant to legalize the structure with the City. Board Member BANGHARTstated the developer was thinking ahead when the pad was designated for parking. She asked if the City has considered protective coverings in weather hazard areas. Ms. Reckert stated the property was rezoned and subdivided in 1988. Because the property is zoned R -IA, there was no planned development approval which specifically identified this area for RV parking. Staff has interpreted that the pad was meant for an auxiliary space, not necessarily RV parking, Board Member KUNTZ stated the property to the north has a large side yard. fie asked if they submitted a letter of support. Ms. White stated the structure is not in the neighbor's side yard and it doesn't prevent the neighbor ftom building something in. that area. They did not submit a letter of support. James Zeiger 3932 Simms St. Mr. Zeiger stated the house and concrete pad were built in 1991 with the intent that the pad be for utility vehicle parking. He purchased the property in 2004 because of the additional parking due to the concrete pad. He didn't'now a pen -nit was needed for the carport structure. They have experienced a, lot of harsh weather, He previously rented a storage unit to protect his vehicles. He erected the structure due to the economic impact to the vehicles and the storage costs. ve the power to change the code nor relies on input from citizens. are small and have no room for vehicle Board Member PAGE referred to one of the letters of support which stated Ms. Zeiger was previously on the IJOA Board. She should have been aware of the HOA rules and regulation. Mr. Zeiger stated he did not submit plans to the Architectural Committee for review. lie said the HOA has no problems with the aesthetics. They would like the structure to be permitted with a building permit. Board Member PAGE asked Mr. Zeiger how long after the structure was erected did he receive the letterfrom the HOA and if he submitted any plans to the Architectural Committee, He replied perhaps 30, 45 but not more than 60. He has not submitted any documents to the Architectural Committee. Board of Adjustment Minutes January 22, 2015 3 Board Member HOVLAND stated a professional contractor would have encouraged a building permit. Mr. Zeiger stated a friend built it. Board Member KUNTZ asked if the rear property owner can see the structure and asked if there are any side yard casements. Mr. Zeiger stated there is a 10- foot setback on the rear for fire code, Ms. Reckert stated most residential subdivisions have a l0 -foot front and 5 -foot side easement for utilities. There- are probably no utilities in the easements on the property. Board Member KUNTZ inquired about the downspouts on the structure that seem to be pointed north, directing runoff to the neighbor's yard, He asked if there was a drainage swale, Mr. Zeiger stated the roof is tilted to the west for the specific purpose of guiding the water to the front concrete and not to the rear or the sides. In response to a question from Board Member KUNTZ, Mr. Zeiger stated all the residents on Simms Street signed the petition with the exception of one, Board Member KUNTZ asked if the structure is insured. Mr. Zeiger replied it is his intent to have the insurance replace if it is damaged by a hail storm. Sandra Henderson 4052 Simms St. Ms. Henderson stag no qualms with it; it 61TOMNO it is adjace. ,garage. S th the staff :erect in the Board M4 vehicle. " structure. the structure daily and does not notice it. She has the neighbors and the HOA. operty to the north. She stated the structure is fully visible -d. The Zeigers don't see the structure as it is on the side of r concerns about noise, setback expectations and concurred ations. She asked the Board to deny the request. She ibit B, some photos of the structure from her property. 4D asked if the structure is more obtrusive than looking at a I it is equally obtrusive as an RV is not a permanent Board Member PAGE asked if the structure was new and if it previously had an awning. Ms. Wood stated the carport was added this summer. ,Joe Meigs 3936 Simms St. Mr. Meigs stated the structure is very visible from his property. It is above the fence line and dominates the area. He stated be was at one time the President of thcl-IOA and it is a known fact that a review process is in place. Any changes are required to Board of Adjustment Minutes January 22, 2015 4 be reviewed by the Architectural Committee, He stated there was no communication from the Zeigers about the structure. lie entered in the record Exhibit C, a letter from the FIOA which stated, "The structure must be approved by the committee," Board Member PAGE asked how long it took to build the structure. Mr. Meigs replied two days. In response to a question from Board Member P called the City shortly after the structure was bu Board Member GRIT FETH asked if there v from the Zeigers prior to it being built. Mr. There was some discussion about metal st metal roof would. Board Member BELL stated thel-IOA pro not get a building permit. The issue is the Board Member GRIFFETH inquired about the Ms. White stated there is no documentation. 'r The plans show a paved pad. Ms. Reckert stab pad was pi for special for an auxiliary parking Meigs stated the HOA about the structure is not allowed but a iot followed and the applicant did not the parking pad, ced RV parking in Exhibit 7. te applicant's interpretation, roperty was platted in 1986 and include use restrictions. The tee. There are no provisions I Member KUNTZ asked if HOA covenants are recorded, Ms. Reckcrt stated new neighborhoods do have HOA covenants that are recorded with Jefferson ty Clerk and Recorder's Office. Most typically they address maintenance of ion elements such as detention ponds and streetscape landscaping in the right - focus of the hearing is the structure not the concrete pad. stated the structure was built without a permit. Ms. White stated the side setbacks and lot coverage are the focus of the hearing. Ann Greenfield 3805 Simms St. Ms. Greenfield is the current HOA President. She stated the HOA has decided to not make a decision before the City as they didn't know what the, process entails and did not want to come to any conclusions. The HOA board has not discussed this since Board of Adjustment Minutes January 22, 2015 5 July and has no opinion. She is unaware of the mentioned petition. If the BOA approves the request the Architectural Committee will negotiate with the Zeigers. Board Member KUNTZ inquired about the applicants' Exhibit 7, Criteria 3 which states the structure is acceptable to the IJOA. fie asked il'that is a misrepresentation, Ms. Greenfield stated yes, Mr. Zeiger stated be is comfortable with 140A discussions about aesthetics. fie stated he submitted information to the HOA and was not aware of the next step with tile 1,10A. He stated the structure was expensive to build. Upon a motion by Board Member HHV BELL, the following motion was stated: second by Board Member WHEREAS, application Case No. WA -14-16 was not eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and WHEREAS the relief applied for may not public welfare and without substantially ij regulations governing and City of Wheat NOW, THERFORE Case No. WA -14-16 IN 10 In M without detriment to the the intent and purpose of the An 8.6% lot coverage variance and a 10 -foot side from the 10 -foot standard resulting in 38.6% lot de setback for an existing attached carport. continue to yield a reasonable return in use without the 2. The investment allowed by the variances would not be substantial. 3. The physical surrounding and situation of the property result in an inconvenience, but not a hardship. 4. The alleged hardship was created by a person presently having interest in the property. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The structure be removed within 30 days. Motion was approved by a vote of 8-0. Board of Adjustment Minutes January 22, 2015 6 PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT January 22, 2015 Case No. WA -14-16: An application filed by James and Georganne Zeiger for approval of a lot coverage variance and a 10 -foot side setback variance (100%) from the 10 -foot standard resulting in a 0 -foot side setback for an existing attached carport. (Please print) Name Address In Favor/Opposed u Yn 91 L-2) GZ LwL" )q -:&k 5 WA -14-16 / Zeiger 3932 Simms Street Approval of a two variances related to lot coverage and to side setback Board of Adjustment January 22, 2015 4' by`ti� kJ ■ Aerial :: 3932 Simms St Current Zoning _ Aerial:: 3932 Simms St w�—MINMVP t: c Background & Variance Request R -1A Development Standards Early 2014: Carport Constructed Minimum 9,000sf June 2014: Applicant received notice from HOA Lot size Actual 9,471 sf June 2014: City receives anonymous complaint Maximum 30% Summer 2014: Applicant contacts city Lot Coverage Existing 35.9% September 2014: Submitted for variance Proposed (w/ carport) 38.6% Setback Side (north) Min. Required loft Proposed <l ft Site Plan 3932 Simms St b. +t 3 Ir ,B / 4101 •• sa. jf. 3932 Simms St ' .,z f vdw Neighborhood Lot Coverage I . 3932 Simms St Staff Recommendation Staff recommends DENIAL of the request for a building coverage variance and a setback variance for the following reasons: — The property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use without the variances — The investment allowed by the variances would not be substantial in relation to value of the property — The physical surroundings and situation of the property result in an inconvenience, but not hardship — The alleged hardship was created by a person presently having interest in the property With the following condition: — If denied, staff recommends removal of illegal structure within 2 weeks EMEMERM 3921 Simms St 1�s: , City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 W 29th Ave Phone: 303-235-2846 This letter is in reference to Case No, WA-14-16,-a-reAMest—f'4W- 7107F#M- IM? IV Simms St, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. Jim and Georgeanne Zeiper live directll across the str Jffm- #. -UXgj7 -pq7O-?yW- r,eej X --e-V auyjxzkGwooXjM t FUM installed over the carport on the north side of their property. We have no issue with the design or placement of the structure as it is designed to protect their vehicle from damage and exposure to the often time harsh elements. Additionally, the Zeiger's have always taken meticulous care of their property ?nd we do not see this as a devaluation to the aesthetics of the neighborhood. In closing, we support the Citv of Wheat Rid ;r#ii,t*iAA OVA EE= Steven and Lynn Romeo January 15, 2015 City of WheatRidge, 7500 W. 29" St. WheatRidge CO 800 Attn: Sara White -1 We are neighbors of Jim & Georganne Zeiger. We live five houses from them and drive by their property many times daily. The covering they put up blends in with their house and isn't noticeable to any of the neighbors. We are afraid this whole thing started from a neighborly discussion of treesH We hope you can see your way to putting this matter to rest. RVespec I e i Ilya // l Letter Of Support from Neighbors We were not aware that a permit was needed to erect a carport on our property and we have asked for a variance from the city of Wheat Ridge to leave the carport in place, We are asking for signatures to help support us on the issue. Please sign below if you see no problem with the carport, in our neighborhood, To: Wheat Ridge Planning/Zoning Department Cell phone: 3-229-0173 Address Print Sign * w i r { R t Sin telt', c �. Rodney& Sandra Henderson . : i 10 .• S �� /,� 4� a. �' �� ,.�, ., i\��'' �X.�� 'V .. ..tet. .... t+r•. G � /` y., O� a,)_ RV .- g � e • _ , �.�. C,�� ;lav . �-\a'•�1' ,�~ }Z lam` �tTit`'i�s ••y ♦ 7,7 � _{r. ,,� ^�ZS•S, ",; �� ? ,�x y• •-• . - - �... - fi£ .lir y.� q ', yi. �..w. .- L�.r^'.•"a�k_t �....�� , •''-•fir:._... - � ',<.—+i.'s... . ..-.. � ._ � �R'�la+•a_•. _ � -� ^ Tj Ir-, Iff- C.A '44 C-�AL6"CJ- L' �- P While we appreciate the Zeiger's desire to house all of their vehicles, they have a 3 car garage as does every other house in this neighborhood, with one possible exception. There is one house adjacent to 38 Ih Avenue that appears to have an oversized garage — not a carport, but a garage. Again, the remaining 50+ houses have 3 car garages. An additional consequence of having the metal carport in the setback is noise. When a car or truck is moved in and out of the carport, we hear it in our house because the sound bounces off the side of the brick garage. Again, the Zeigers don't experience this, we do. We bought our house for the yard and we bought it expecting to have setbacks and a buffer from the properties that border our yard. Finally, we appreciate the work of staff and concur with their overall recommendation for denial. Regarding some of the specific variance criteria, we do have a couple of points to make. 1. One criterion is that the variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. For us, the residents most impacted by the metal structure, it would alter the character • we feel this criterion has not #-® met, 2. Another criterion is in regard to substantial investment, We concur with staff that th,5 investment in the metal structure is not substantial compared to the value of the Zeigers home, We appreciate that they made this expenditure, but they did so without approval from the City or from the HOA. 3. Regarding the criterion that the granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare. While the structure does not present a safety issue, it is does have impact. Finally, any hardship was created by the homeowners. This is a neighborhood of 3 c garages and the Zeigers have a 3 car garage like everyone else. It is their choice to ha more than 3 cars and that is their right. However, it is their choice and doesn't necessari mean that they are entitled to construct a structure in the zoned setbacks. So, while there no hardship, there is an impact to the neighbors and the neighborhood, Therefore, we a you to deny this variance request. Jim and Georganne Zeiger 3932 Simms Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Jim and Georganne: It has come to my attention that a cover has been built on the north side of your home, possibly for a carport. Per the Protective Covenants, Paragraph B-2, "no building shall be erected, placed or altered on any site until the construction plans, specifications, and a plan showing the location of the structure have been approved by the Architectural Control Committee as to quality of workmanship and material, harmony of external design with existing structures, and antra location with respect to topography and finish grade elevation," Further, I have spoken to the City of Wheat Ridge and found their requirements for the structure are: 1) A permit must be obtained fear the structure; 2) if the structure is higher than 10 feet, the setback has to be 10 feet. If the structure is less than 10 feet, the structure has to have a setback of 5% and, 3) no metal structures can be used in residential zoned properties, If the structure is in violation of the City of Wheat Ridge's requirements, a request variance can be made. If you have arty questions regarding the City's requirements, you can contact Wade at City cat Wheat Ridge Zoning, 303-235-2847, Even though this is after the fact, please submit your request for the architectural change to me via email at ryqnsn tLILL,?63 I 0)vahg_oq,()nj along with measurements and pictures of the structure,. , j Q� I will forward the request to the Board of Directors for their review. 1� Kathleen R. Smith A .s City of 9rwh6atP,i:[dge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Board of Adjustment DATE: January 14, 201 ti CASE MANAGER: Sara White CASE NO. & NAME: WA -14-16 / Zeiger ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of an 8.6% lot coverage variance and a l 0 -foot variance from the 10 - foot side yard setback requirement for property located at 3932 Simms Street and zoned Residential -One A (R -1A). LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3932 Simms St. APPLICANT (S) OWNER (S): APPROXIMATE AREA: James and Georganne Zeiger James and Georganne Zeiger 9,471 Square Feet (0.22 Acres) PRESENT ZONING: Residential -One A PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) Digital presentation (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Location Map 912990"M All notification and posting requirements have been net; therefore, there is jurisdiction for the Board to hear this case. The applicants are requesting approval of a 8.6% (28.6%) lot coverage variance from the 30% lot coverage maximum and a 10 -foot (100%) variance from the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, resulting in a 0 -foot side setback. The purpose of this variance is to allow for the applicants to keel) a carport that was constructed without a pennit. 11. CASE ANALYSIS The applicants, James and Georganne Zeiger, are requesting the variance as the owners and residents at 3932 Simms Street. The variance is being requested so that the owners may keep a carport that was constructed on the north side of their home The property is zoned Residential -One A, a zone district that is established to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable low-density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature Mi which are incompatible with the low-density residential character F, .... ... .. . 0 The subject lot is 9,471 square feet in size and has a single family home with attached garage. The parcel is on Simms Street, north of 38"' Avenue, and is part of the McLaughlin's Applewood Subdivision. By definition, the front lot line of the subject property is the western property line, which is parallel with Simms St., and the side property line for which the variance is being requested is the north property line that runs perpendicular to Simms St. The applicants constructed the carport on the north side of their house to provide protection from the elements for the RV parking that was already there. The carport extends nearly all the way to the north property line from the house and is roughly 25.5 feet in length 40" S'�E, It i roughly I s, gill 9 feet tall ro . .. . .. . "EMN& A wooden locking gate' conceals the majority and is constructed of aluminum. of the carport from view from the street. Dense vegetation exists a , long the north property line that may help to conceal the carport from view of the neighbor to the north The R- I A zone district allows lot coverage up to 30%. Based on data from the Jefferson County Assessor, current lot coverage is 35.9%, which is over the allowed amount. The addition of the carport would bring the total to 3 8.6%. Development standards for the R-1 A district along with existing conditions are as follows: Variance RA -14- If) Zciswr The carport extends nearly all the way to the fence line, essentially creating a 0 foot side setback on the north property line. Although it appears that other properties in the neighborhood may have accessory structures that do not meet setback requirements, it does not appear that any variances have been granted in the area and those structures may be either non -conforming or illegal. It also appears that there are multiple properties in the subdivision that already exceed the maximum 11o"t. coverage. Nine out of fifty lots in the subdivision are currently over the 30% lot coverage NOW During the public notification period no objections were received regarding the variance request. One ... . ..... letter of support was received h Since the setback variance is for greater than 50%, there was no administrative review of the application. The Board of Adjustment must find the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115,C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. Please note that the variances are being addressed together. If the setback variance is approved, the lot coverage variance must be approved as well. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to be used as a single-family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance requests. An alternative for protection of the RV would be a manufactured fabric vehicle cover. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are not likely to alter the character of the locality, as the requests would allow an accessory to a single family home to remain. It is largely hidden from view by a wooden gate and mature vegetation. Staff finds this criterion has been met, 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. While the applicant did invest several thousand dollars into the construction of the carport, it is not considered substantial in relation to the value of the property as a whole. Varian(v RA - 14- 16 7eiger Staff finds this criterion has not been net 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. The larger size of the house on a relatively small parcel is requiring the applicant to request the variances. However, it is only an inconvenience as the lot would not be Undevelopable without the variances. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 5. The alleged difficulo, or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The alleged hardship was created by the applicants when they constructed the carport without obtaining zoning and building approval. Therefore, the applicants were party in creating the alleged hardship. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The requests would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements as the carport is largely shielded from view by the existing wooden fence. They would not binder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this requests. The requests would not increase congestion on the streets, nor would they increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. They are unlikely to diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met, 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. The hardship described is in relation to the size and placement of a larger house on relatively smaller lots. There are many houses in the immediate neighborhood with similar conditions and would likely necessitate a request for either a setback or lot coverage variance, or both, if they want to construct accessory structures. Nearly 20% of the homes in the surrounding development already exceed the maximum lot coverage. Variance DVA -14-16 Zxiger 4 Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not gpplicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not antilicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application not in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends DENIAL of an 8.6% lot coverage variance from the 30% maximum coverage requirement and a I 0 -foot (100%) variance from the I 0 -foot side yard setback requirement. Staff has not found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of the variances. Therefore, staff recommends denial for the following reasons: 1. The property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use without the variances. 2. The investment allowed by the variances would not be substantial, 3. The physical surroundings and situation of the property result in an inconvenience, but not a hardship. 4. The alleged hardship was created by a person presently having interest in the property. If the variance is denied, Staff recommends a two-week window for removal of the structure. T"a 1111 w w HA -14-16 /esger 5 EXHIBIT 3: ILC DATE 10/20/2014rEE asn_nn JOB# ia_Ana RoEJKW CLIENT rnrrarry nF TRFRTRCA� ADDRESS 1412 RTMMR RTRrrT LAND S U RVEY ING NAME Tnlarc vrTr_rrt 5460 WARD ROAD + SUITE 160 ARVADA. COLORADO 80002 (303) 420-4788 IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER CLIENT) S88 ATTACHED Note: LEGAL DESCRITPION Certificate is Based on Control as Shown, An Improvement Survey Plat is Recommended for Precise Location of Improvements. I Note: L� Location of Fence Lines if Shown are Approximate. Fence Line Scale: ]"=29 I I Pad Eley. 99.66' Pad Elev. 99.88' I LO"f 43 Roof Ekv. 108.11' Roof Flee. 108.95 I I Pad Eley. 99.66' ' v, Found 5/3" I Roof Elev. 109.46 Rebar 105.00 �\ J. R F2/�C, �/ arPort i.j;413.3 25.7 t 46.2 a r : ai Wev. 9935 p '. «• Pad Ek99 v-.99' J r . . > • Roof Ekv. 10932'/ ' • ' ti N ' t • • o A �* BmcYlmrk- Aas�ed • ' I U •. N 100.00' Elevation 8 Gtaage Slab Ekv. 9935 a - i- •:T _� 16.0 ®Cenlaliae of Door One Story Brick & Frame E o I First Floor Ekv. 102.10' `t COnCtEte' ® FToet Door r7 � 6 IO E=eptcd Portion (Per 1.46") S89°49'22"W 41.4 I LOT 16 Concrete I cn 0 I I 6.1 _ I I I 3 _.. I 6c po LOT 15 .i I 00 0 I U � I^• Z 4.5 N 38.8 N 00 O� LOT 44 13.4 S89049'22"W LOT 45 I'ai•iance N A-14-16 7-eiger- 8 EXHIBIT 4: ELEVATIONS North Elevation 4. carport atherhanent rehouse at 9 fail elevation shave Conkrete Pad 5, 1 fear deDP from ca4vrt attachment at roof to support. Pasts for gutter draio•off of water t.. Carportruofmaterod is 0.025'thickness, Atuninum Allay 3004-H36, enamel paiotrd inbreed & white calor}. Carport is anchored to house brick wall with haff1mch, galvanized ASTM A325 Holes with epoxy filled bol"hoiec. 7, Posts are 3 by 3 inch, Extruded Aluminum Ahoy 6005,TS posts, secured to carport raef with structure rauxi tet wtoths£and a minimum of 90 mph, 3 aecond past of wind. . reyubred per ASCE7-05 National Standard 8, post will do retrofitted (Per approval of varoneve by the ^,.,. City of Wheat Ridge) with 36 -inch concrete caisson and mannered under permit by Chief Building, Official, John ' Schumacher SCAM V- 4' «.w».....,.. ...««....�.,....,..,..... .._...«,...,.».._,._..,.,....«...,.....,,mow"^.. .,�.�`� 'w^'.ry w � iY� yxrt .1w ..... .. ...............,,.....,.. r 1 VFf'ttT:nce 111,4-14-16 It;"t.ger a I .~.«moa.. N .'�.. ri ghxo£cxi`eatrt'a4Stet a: nY1aCh..rrkwnk to 3aeaxxm EXHIBIT 5: PHOTOS View facing East inside of gate Variance MA -14-16 Leiger 10 ,f L' r EXHIBIT 6: COVERAGE MAP Legend Lot Coverage Variance WA -14-16 Zeiger 12 ,* . hardshipA variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a unique physical present,Per the reviewing authority (Community Development Director, Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission, or City Council) shall base its decision applicant * .majority of the following criteria have been met., I The . ,..questionwould not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located, I ,v a. a s a ,•• s p: a . a ► s s . tr s ♦ a: „ rt *..„ s is o ♦: a s asa s �s s s.. , a s s e °• s s s s varianceZ The would + essential .w requestr of the locality, The variance aintent a use of g providing coverage for vehlote$ ParkOd On the Side of the house. The aoyomingnaighbors house is located approximatelyfeet away from property related to tire safety and the required building oftets. Also, there is mature landscaping .'• s the property carss, t almost ininsiblefrom, ground applicant3, The proposing a substantial investment in the Property with this application, undertakenwhich would not be possible without the variance, The investment to constructcarport a bring up to code for structure footing code requirementsssr - :.*d# s very high k qualitylly + a ft * the '.+and strong very oendureYF windand 4, The particular physical surrounding, #topographical condition of the specific property results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from ^ inconvenience, ThO layout Of the house and property lot is Space Constrained* it is impossible to locate covered protection for an outdoor vehicle in any location Other than the RV driveway location. The outside space of back rd and on both side$ of the house are space •: ^ # ♦ ♦ is i •. ♦ f : ." i �, forstructures 120 rk uare feet or smaller does not allow for proper placement on our lot, i.e., ite very a there5If is a particular#: : "` hardship, the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been property,created by any person presently having an interest in the Variance WA - 14- 16 Zeiger 13 6 The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other propertyor ♦ property among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood, " granting of M be injuriousto other property improvements Reviewbythe HOA wasperformed and in a letter dated # ly 240', 2014 HOA raised #:concerns with the carport for or 1kimpacton i i # # # # A did ask that we seek a variance from the city for the HOA's records, Other than the variance, the HOA expressed noconcernfor # or #impairmentof adjacent property or 7, The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. The majority of the homes located In the McLaughlin's subdivision Ore space constrained #.. lot sizebecause of the large home toot prints' Understanding that a number of homes have these tight space constraints, there are many free standing structures (tool sheds), which are located less than 5 feet from property understood within the subdivision that there is no reasonable alternative and none of these structures are viewed negatively by the adjacent home owners or subject to HOA corrective action. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with SENSE=disabilities. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes,) . The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural arra Site Design Manua . [Dass not typically apply to single- or two-family homes] Variance PYA -14-16 Zeiger 14 January 11, 2015 TQ Sara White City Of Wheat Ridge Planning Division 75M W. 29h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 8M33 RE. Letter Notice 3932 Simms Strut Case No. WA -14-1.6 Dear Sara, We are property owners at 3909 Simms Street, a few doors from the above reference property, i understand that this existing attached carport does not meet the City's setback requirements, per your letter, however it is an attractive, well built, non -obtrusive structure that will serve as a protective cover for their vehicle; Currently, there are other structures in the neighborhood that encroach fences and property lines, but haven't shown to be problematic. Therefore, I am recommending that the City grant approval for this structure. Best Regards, Rick and Kim Bolas IV o-4-14-16 7(,ig(,)- TO: Sara White City Of Wheat Ridge Manning Division 7500 W. 291n Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 R: Letter Notice 3932 Simms Street Case No. WA -14-16 Dear Sara, We are property owners at 3909 Simms Street, a few doors from the above reference property. I understand that this existing attached carport does not meet the City's setback requirements, per your letter, however it is an attractive, well built, non -obtrusive structure that will serve as a protective cover for their vehicle. Currently, there are other structures in the neighborhood that encroach fences and property lines, but haven't shown to be problematic. Therefore, I am recommending that the City grant approval for this structure. Best Regards, Rick and Kim Bolas Re: Public Hearing for 3932 Simms Street MW I am unable to attend this public meeting due tear obil'ity issues. I live at 3928 Simms Street, which is one house to the south, I have seen the Zeiger's carport and find no issue or concerns with it. It is on the side of their home and was erected to protect their vehicle from hall, Many homes in the McLaughlin neighborhood have large sheds (Including mine) which are directly up against adjoining fences, I would ask that this carport be approved by the city, January 15,2015 City of WheatRidge 7500 W. 29" St. WheatRidge CO 80033 Attn: Sara White We are neighbors of Jim & Georganne Zeiger. We live five houses from them and drive by their property many times daily. The covering they put up blends in with their house and isn't noticeable to any of the neighbors. We are afraid this whole thing started from a neighborly discussion of trees!! We hope you can see your way to putting this matter to rest. Respec 11y, January 12, 2015 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 W 29th Ave Wmeat& fV0033- 'Vt This letter is in reference to Case No. Simms St, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. Steven and Lynn Romeo 3921 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 MUORIMMio F441L' WM-2-4— I'V*ss iimHrb�v*ew, installed over the carport on the north side of their property. We have no issue with the design or placement of the structure as it is designed to protect their vehicle from damage and exposure to the often time harsh elements. Additionally, the Zeiger's have always taken meticulous care of their property and we do not see this as a devaluation to the aesthetics of the neighborhood, Steven and Lynn Romeo BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing to consider Case No, WA -14-16, a request for approval of a lot coverage variance and a I0 -root side setback variance (100%) from the I0 -foot standard resulting in a 0 -foot side setback for an existing attached carport for property located at 3932 Simms Street. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers, Municipal Building at 7500 West 29"' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, on January 22, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. This ad is a correction to the ad published in the Wheat Ridge Transcript on January 8, 2015. The full text of this notice is available in electronic form on the City's official website, www.ci.whqqj[j4ge.co.us, Legal Notices. Copies are also available in printed form in the Community Development Department. Published: Denver Post, January 6, 2015 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing to consider Case No. WA -14-16, a request for approval of a 10 -foot side setback variance (100%) from the I 0 -foot standard resulting in a 0 -foot side setback for an existing attached carport for property located at 3932 Simms Street. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers, Municipal Building at 7500 West 29'11 Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, on January 22, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The full text of this notice is available in electronic form on the City's official website, www.ci.whcatrid �!p�,co,us, Legal Notices, Copies are also available in printed form in the Community Development Department. Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript, January 8, 2015 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on January 22, 2015, at 7:00 p.tu. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29"' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. Individuals with disabilities are encourttged to participate in all public meetings si)onsored by the City of J17heat Ridge, Call heather Creyer, Public Jqfortnation Qf ,ficer at 303-235-2826 at least one week in advance of meeting zfyott are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. The following petition shall be heard: Case No. WA -14-16: An application filed by James and Georganne Zeiger for approval of a lot coverage variance and a 10 -foot side setback variance (100%) from the 10 -foot standard resulting in a 0 -foot side setback for art existing attached carport for property located at 3932 Sininis Street and legally described as follows; Lot 44, McLaughlin's Applewood Subdivision amended, except that part of the East 6.1 feet of lot 44, McLaughlin's Applewood Subdivision amended, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, which lies immediately West of and adjacent to Lot 16, Appleview Subdivision, which was conveyed to Richard L, Kellogg and Clarice M. Kellogg by Quit Claim Deed recorded October 27, 1987 at Reception No. 87131902, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Also know by street and number as 3932 Sirnrns Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Kin) M3U0,rWr, AdftniSjraLive A%%iyjAnt h 4 {. ity of Wh6atge TETTER NOTICE CERTIFICATION (as required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.1) Case No.: WA -14-16 Date of Board of Ad'utment hearing. Janus 2 201 I Kim Vi{a onr, Administrative Assistant, Comunit Develo meat D artment hereby certify that I mailed a total of 43 letters on 4JApyary 6 2015 to the attached recipient list at least 15 days prior to a scheduled public hearing. 5. Signature. y Date. , ` City OfW heat " 41 idge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE (As required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.D) January 6, 2015 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA -14-16, a request for approval of a lot coverage variance and a 10 -foot side setback variance (100%) from the 10 -foot standard resulting in a 0-footside setback for an existing attached carport on property located at 3932 Simms St. This request will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on January 22, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer at 303-235-2826 at least one week in advance of a meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. WA1416.doc www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Vicinity Map LOT 44 SW49'22"W 15TW— I (VT 4% Ewrrd P. (I. tZPI) SW49'22"W 41A L Conaft J.outtton of Fence I. inL, if Shown arc Approximatc RAA Fence Line PW Fk' " 6h* Pm kJ. " tg Scala 1--m LOT 43 lu.tv.b. 108, LOT 44 SW49'22"W 15TW— I (VT 4% Ewrrd P. (I. tZPI) SW49'22"W 41A Conaft 105.00 RAA k 6.1 Eaxistfng Ca 3.3 am. 003t W Ehry R—lEk, log -52, PIIWCAhlwk. Ammmd 4.5 FAbEk, "W D @C�Wdiwemm one un wt Bda & Frame F, rlrarBlt+. 102.1b .E i7i 7 i C0,0CIVIC LOT 44 SW49'22"W 15TW— I (VT 4% Ewrrd P. (I. tZPI) SW49'22"W 41A Conaft 8.0 6.1 3.0 4.5 13 A 244 ADAMSON MARK C ALLISON MARVIN D ANDIS ANN M ADAMSON KIMBERLEE K 3928 SIMMS ST 3821 ROUTT s,r 11596 W 38TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 ASHKER E JUNE 11548 W 39TH AVE WHEAT' RIDGE CO 80033 BOLAS DERRICK 1, BOLAS KIMBERLY K 3909 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 DASCENZ GARY D 3816 SIMMS ST W,TEAT' RIDGE CO 80033 DONZETE'RRY W DONZE KAREN S 4048 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 EGGERS WALTER KARL EGGERS KAREN MCCLAIN 4044 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 FREEMAN RICHARD A FREEMAN JOAN C 11597 W 38TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 I'IEN'FSCHEL JEFFREY HENTSCHEL KAITLIN 11589 W 39TH AVE WHEAFT' RIDGE CO 80033 BAKER SUSAN V 3925 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 BUTLER MARY BUT JOHN A 211 MAYS DR BLOOMINGTON IL 61701 DELACRUZ MIGUEL DELACRUZ ERMINDA LOPEZ LORENA VALENCIA 3831 ROU'1717 ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 DOUGHDRILL REBECCA P 3929 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 FINN GARY WAYNE FINN LORI ANNE 11549 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 GREENFIELD BARRY L GREENFIELD ANN C 110 BOX 8 ARLINGTON KS 67514 HERNANDEZ ELMER J HERNANDEZ AURORA RUIZ 3913 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 J,IANNETI'l MARY C LARUSSO MICHAEL A JIANNETTI LINA M CONSERVATOR LARUSSO VIRGINIA M '%o GINA JANNETTI CONSERVATOR 3806 SIMMS CT 11577 W 38TH PL WHEATRIDE E CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 MCGOWAN TERRY 0 MEIGS JOE V MCGOWAN LAURA J WOOD SUSAN A 11557 W 38TH PL .3936 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 BENDEVER WALTER E JR BENDEVER BARBARA J 3940 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 CROCKERTONT M 11568 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 DEVELOPMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES INC PO BOX 2080 CANON CITY CO 81215 EGAN PAUL M EGAN CYNTHIA K 3917 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 FREEMAN DONALD B FREEMAN SUSAN E 4033 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 HENSLEY VIVIAN M 3922 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 JAQUAY HOWARD E JAQUAY ANNMARIE 3930 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 LAYMAN VALERIE S 3840 RourT ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 NIEUWENHUIS EVELYN M 11560 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 OLIVER JEANNE OSTUNIROSA ROMEO STEVEN A 11591 W 39TH PL 3820 SIMMS ST ROMEO LYNN A WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3921 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SAL 'ANO ARMANDO SALZANO BERTINA 3914 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 STURMS ROBERT A STURNIS REBECCA JPMB 274 YOUNGFIELD ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 VITALE RAFFAELE VITALE FILOMENA M3910 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 ZEIGER JAMES R ZEIGER GEORGANNE L 3932 SIMMS ST WI-11""ATRIDGE CO 80033 SISCO DEAN PO BOX 494 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80034 THORNBURGH BRYON N JOSEPH HILLARY 3819 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WILLIAMS STEVE J WILLIAMS CONNIE M 11569 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 STANSBURY TODD VANCE CMR 480 BOX 1601 APO AE 9128 TSM TRUST 3924 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 YAMAGUCHI CHARLIE S YAMAGUCHI CHISEKO 11530 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 Owner 1 Owner 2 Owner 3 Company Mailing Address St Street Name Type Unit City State Zip Property Address St Street Name Type City State Zip Use ADAMSON MARK C ADAMSON MARK C _ ALLISON MARVIN D ANDIS ANN M ASHKER E JUNE ADAMSON KIMBERLEE K ADAMSON KIMBERLEE K 11596 W 11596 W 3928 3821 11548 W 38TH 38TH SIMMS ROUTT 39TH PL PL ST ST AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO WHEAT RIDGE CO WHEAT RIDGE CO WHEAT RIDGE CO WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 80033 80033 80033 80033 11596 W 11596 W 3928 3821 11548 W 38TH 38TH SIMMS ROUTT 39TH PL PL ST ST AVE WHEAT RIDGE WHEAT RIDGE WHEAT RIDGE WHEAT RIDGE WHEAT RIDGE CO CO CO CO CO 80033 RESID 80033 RESID 80033 RESID 80033 RESID 80033 RESID BAKER SUSAN V 3925 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3925 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID BENDEVER WALTER E JR BENDEVER BARBARA J 3940 ISIMMS ST I WHEAT RIDGECO 1800331 3940 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID BOLAS DERRICK L BOLAS KIMBERLY K 3909 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3909 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID BUTLER MARY BUTLER JOHN A 211 MAYS DR BLOOMINGTO IL 61701 11576 W 38TH PL WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID CROCKER TONI M 11568 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11568 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID DASCENZ GARY D 3816 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3816 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID DELACRUZ MIGUEL DELACRUZ ERMINDA LOPEZL0 3831 ROUTT ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3831 ROUTT ST WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID DEVELOPMENTAL OPPORTUNITIE PO BOX 2080 CANON CITY CO 81215 11590 W 39TH IPL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 COMMR DEVELOPMENTAL OPPORTUNITIE _ PO BOX 2080 CANON CITY CO 81215 11590 W 39TH IPL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 COMMR DEVELOPMENTAL OPPORTUNITIE jP0 BOX 2080 1 CANON CITY CO 812151 11590 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 COMMR DONZE TERRY W DONZE KAREN S 4048 SIMMS ST I WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4048 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RESID DOUGHDRILL REBECCA P 3929 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3929 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RESID EGAN PAUL M EGAN CYNTHIA K 3917 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3917 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RESID EGGERS WALTER KARL EGGERS KAREN MCCLAIN 4044 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4044 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGi CO 80033 RESID FINN GARY WAYNE FINN LORI ANNE 11549 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11549 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RESID FREEMAN DONALD B FREEMAN SUSAN E 4033 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4033 SIMMS IST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RESID FREEMAN RICHARD A FREEMAN JOAN C 11597 W 38TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11597 W 38TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RESID GREENFIELD BARRY L GREENFIELD ANN C PO BOX 8 ARLINGTON KS 675141 3805 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RESID HENSLEY VIVIAN M 3922 SIMMS CT I WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3922 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 1800331RESID HENTSCHEL JEFFREY HENTSCHEL KAITLIN 11589 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11589 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID HENTSCHEL JEFFREY HENTSCHEL JEFFREY HENTSCHEL KAITLIN HENTSCHEL KAITLIN 11589 W 11589 W 39TH 39TH AVE AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 80033 11589 W 11589 W 39TH 39TH AVE AVE WHEAT RIDG WHEAT RIDG CO CO 80033 RESID 80033 RESID HERNANDEZ ELMER J HERNANDEZ AURORA RUIZ 3913 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 800 3913 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID JAQUAY HOWARD E JAQUAY ANNMARIE 3930 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3930 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID JIANNETTI MARY C JIANNETTI GINA M CONSERV % GINA JANNETTI C 11577 W 38TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11577 W 38TH PL WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID LARUSSO MICHAEL A LARUSSO VIRGINIA M 3806 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3806 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID LAYMAN VALERIE S 3840 ROUTT ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11588 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID MCGOWAN TERRY O MCGOWAN LAURA J 11557 W 38TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11557 W 38TH PL WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID MEIGS JOE V WOOD SUSAN A 3936 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3936 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID NIEUWENHUIS EVELYN M 11560 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11560 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID OLIVER JEANNE 11591 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11591 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID OLIVER JEANNE 11591 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11591 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID OLIVER JEANNE 11591 W 139TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11591 W 139TH PL WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID OSTUNI ROSA 3820 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 800331 3820 SIMMS IST WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID ROMEO STEVEN A SALZANO ARMANDO SISCO DEAN STANSBURY TODD VANCE ROMEO LYNN A SALZANO BERTINA 3921 3914 SIMMS SIMMS PO BOX 494 CMR 480 BOX 161 ST CT WHEAT RIDGE CO WHEAT RIDGE CO WHEAT RIDGE CO APO AE 80033 80033 80034 9128 3921 3914 3941 3921 SIMMS SIMMS ROUTT ROUTT ST CT ST ST WHEAT RIDG WHEAT RIDG WHEAT RIDG WHEAT RIDG CO CO CO CO 80033 RESID 80033 RESID 80033 RESID 80033 RESID STURMS ROBERT A STURMS REBECCA J PMB 274 3440 YOUNGFIELD ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3926 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID THORNBURGH BRYON N JOSEPH HILLARY 3918 SIMMS CT 1WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3918 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID TSM TRUST 3924 ISIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE ICO 80033 3924 ISIMMS ST WHEAT RIDG CO 180033 RESID VITALE RAFFAELE VITALE FILOMENA M 3910 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3910 SIMMS CT WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID WILLIAMS STEVE J WILLIAMS CONNIE M 11569 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11569 W 39TH AVE WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID YAMAGUCHI CHARLIE S YAMAGUCHI CHISEKO 11530 W 39TH PIL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11530 W 39TH PL WHEAT RIDG CO 80033 RESID ZEIGER JAMES R ZEIGER GEORGANNE L 3932 SIMMS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 3932 SIMMS ST 1WHEAT RIDG CO 1800331RESID City of �Wh6atl ,j,dg,t COMMUNt'ry DEVELOPMENT City of'Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 3012352846 F: 301235.2857 September 16, 2014 James and Georganne Zeiger 3932 Simms St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Case No. WA- 14-16 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Zeiger: In the initial review of your request for variance WA -14-11 for the carport at 3932 Simms St., we have identified some omissions in the required submittal as detailed in the Submittal Checklist for Variance. This checklist can be found on the Community Development website and is also attached to this letter. The following must be submitted for your application to be considered complete and for staff to review the application - Proof of ownership-e.g. deed, Survey or Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) of the property; • "To -scale" site plan indicating existing and proposed building footprints and setbacks; and • Proposed building elevations indicating proposed heights, materials, and color scheme. The submitted drawings do not include an appropriate level of detail for the required submission. Site plan must be scaled, identify all setbacks, and include all appropriate context such as street locations, north arrow, etc... More detail is required on the given elevations including materials and color scheme. Please submit all required materials ASAP. The deadline for a completed application to be on the October 23, 2014 Board of Adjustment agenda is September 29, 2014. If you have any other questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Sara White Planner 11 303-235-2852 swhite@)ci.wheatridge.co.us www.ci.wheatridge.co.us City of Rev. 5/2014 hcatP dge- COMMUNiTy DEvt,,L(,)PmfNT Review Criteria: Variance property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located, # 171of 1717 to protect our outdoor vehicle, stored on the RV driveway with an attached carport roof to prevent severe hail damage. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. related to fire safe and the required building offsets. Also, there i's mature landscaping along the property line that makes the carport almost invisible from ground level. �he awlicant is jroj jig j jjij g9j,g" The investment undertaken to construct this carport and bring up to code for structure footing code requirements is approximately $6900, total. The structure is vepAl No -id -- ,Aauali aes k, wind and rain. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, 5. If there is a particular or unique hardship, the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property, Community Development Department (303) 235-2846 - www,ci.wheatridge.co.us Tfre dil'riciilfttv I III J r 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The granting of the variance will not be injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. Review by the HOA was performed and in a letter dated July 20., 2014 the HOA raised no concerns with the carport structure for aesthetics or negative impact on neighborhood. The HOA did ask that we see a variance from the city for the HOA's records. Other than the variance, the HOA expressed no concern for any substantial or minor impairment of adjacent property use or value. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are presen in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property, The majority of the homes located in the McLaughlin's subdivision are space constrained in lot size because of the large home foot prints. Understanding that a number of homes have these tight space constraints there are many free standing structures (tool sheds), which are located less than 5 feet from their property lines. It is understood within the subdivision that there is no reasonable alternative and none of these structures are viewed negatively by the adjacent home owners or subject tR HOA corrective action. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.) E0ZJ7,1,= 4. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.] UMMMORM Jim and Georganne Zeiger 3932 Simms Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Jim and Georganne: The Board of Directors of McLaughlin's Applewrood HOA met on July 16, 2014. Brought to the Board of Directors by an owner at McLaughlin's Applewood HOA, one topic of conversation was the carport that you have erected on the north side of your home. I have enclosed the Zoning Map and development standards from the City of Wheat Ridge. Please note that the minimum side yard setback is 10 feet, the lot line to your foundation. Clarification of the setback requirements can be given to you by Wade Saner at the City of Wheat Ridge Zoning Department, 303-238-2847. First of all, the Board of Directors requests that you have the structure approved by the City of Wheat Ridge and said approval should then be forwarded to me for the Association records. When speaking with Wade, he informed me that you would need to apply for a permit to start the process. If the carport does not meet the City's requirements, it will be necessary for you to request a variance from the City of Wheat Ridge. The Board requests that the approval of the carport structure be received no later than August 31, 2014. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 720-272-8319. Sincerely, Kathleen R, Smith We were not aware that a permit was needed to erect a carport on our property and we have asked for a variance from the city of Wheat Ridge to leave the carport in place. We are asking for signatures to help support us on the issue. Please sign below if you see no problem with the carport in our neighborhood. Address Print Sign We live at 4052 Simms St. in the McLaughlin/Applewood subdivision and have lived at this address since 1988. Sandra has served on the homeowners board many times over the years. Our home is near the Zeigers and do not feel the carport is a distraction in any way. In fact, it blends in with their home very well. We would like to encourage you to grant the variance. Ain hely, Rodney & Sandra Henderson 4. Carport attachment to house at 9 feet elevation above concrete pad S. 1 foot drop from carport attachment at roof to support posts for gutter drain -off of water 6. Carport roof material is 0.025" thickness, Aluminum Alloy 3004-H36, enamel painted (almond & white color). Carport is anchored to house brick wall with half-inch, galvanized ASTM A325 Bolts with epoxy filled bolt -holes. 7. Posts are 3 by 3 inch, Extruded Aluminum Alloy 6005-T5 posts, secured to carport roof with structure rated to withstand a minimum of 90 mph, 3 second gust of wind as required per ASCE7-05 National Standard 8. Post will be retrofitted (per approval of variance by the and )hn oI SCALE: 1" = 5' North 3. Wooden locking gate conceals carport view from street 10.0' 9.0' � 1� : ; ; E 1 1 SCALE: 1"= 5' North 1. Width/Depth of carport is 10 feet 2. Height of carport is 9 feet at attachment to house swat mol 6e. RH.,rd IS" ,61tG :TrveT L ova i favocw"Olum iR 12D2� �t St'f� Ow - - - ------------------- -. :1 , )r q /I ;, .,) If 5 Pu== 1 SECTION VIEW ISOMETRIC VIEW Os� l�c�e 1 l q SECTION PROPERTIES: MATERIAL ALUMNIUM ALUMNIUM ALUMNIUM STEEL THICKNESS 0.025" 0.032" 0.040" 26 GAGE (0.0179' 1. AREA 0.487 IN -2--0.650 IN -2 0.813IN-2-_0.363 IN -2 2. WEIGHT 0.571 PSF 0.762 PSF 0.953 PSF 1.234 PSF 3. MOMENT OF INERTIA 0.431 IN^4 0.576 IN -4 0.721 IN"4 0.321 IN -4 4. SECTION MODULUS TOP 0.305 IN^J 0.407 IN" 3 0.509 IN -3 0.227 IN" 3 5. SECTION MODULUS BOTTOM 0.388 IN" 3 0.515 IN -3 0.642 IN -3 0.290 IN -3 NOTES: 1. ALUMNIUM DECK IS FABRICATED FROM ALUMNIUM ALLOY 3004-H36. 2. STEEL DECK IS FABRICATED FROM ASTM A1008 STEEL 3. DECK IS PROVIDED CUT TO LENGTH. 4. SECTION PROPERTIES ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. MEMBER DESIGNS ARE OFTEN GOVERNED BY BUCKLING OR DEFLECTION AND THE FULL SECTION CAPACITY MAY NOT BE DEVELOPED. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION 42-0000 2.5'x12• W Pan Deck 5.960" 0.180 0.180 FRONT VIEW 1.638" 2.324"41 1.638" BOTTOM VIEW 0 ao 0 2.750" SIDE VIEW 6 00 N ISOMETRIC VIEW NOTES: 1. COLUMN BEARING PLATES ARE AN EXTRUDED SHAPE FABRICATED FROM ALUMNIUM ALLOY 6063-T5. 2. HOLES ARE PRE -DRILLED AT BALLEW'S. 3. TYPICALLY USED TO CONNECT COLUMNS TO BEAMS. 4. SECTION PROPERTIES ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. MEMBER DESIGNS ARE OFTEN GOVERNED BY BUCKLING OR DEFLECTION AND THE FULL SECTION CAPACITY MAY NOT BE DEVELOPED. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION 70-3005 3• Column Bearing Plate 2.750" FRONT VIEW BOTTOM VIEW 0.125" 2 AC 2" 0.125 pl 0.125 pr - SIDE VIEW ISOMETRIC VIEW NOTES; 1. COLUMN GUTTER CONNECTORS ARE AN EXTRUDED SHAPE FABRICATED FROM ALUMNIUM ALLOY 6063-T6. 2. HOLES ARE PRE -DRILLED AT BALLEW'S. 3. TYPICALLY USED TO CONNECT COLUMNS TO GUTTERS. 4. SECTION PROPERTIES ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. MEMBER DESIGNS ARE OFTEN GOVERNED BY BUCKLING OR DEFLECTION AND THE FULL SECTION CAPACITY MAY NOT BE DEVELOPED. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION 70-3006 3• Chair Bracket r M O 0.688" • In N tO X — X O IQ M Y 3 �. THICKNESS 0.048" SECTION VIEW ISOMETRIC VIEW SECTION PROPERTIES (COMBINED SECTION); 1 • AREA 0.732 SQUARE INCHES 2. WEIGHT 0.706 POUNDS PER FOOT 3. MOMENT OF INERTIA (X -X) 3.7277 IN -4 4. SECTION MODULUS TOP (X -X_0.835 IN -3 5. SECTION MODULUS BOTTOM (X-XL_1.401 IN -3 6. RADIUS OF GYRATION (X -X) 2.257 IN "[ 7. MOMENT OF INERTIA (Y -Y) 1.0597 IN -4 8. RADIUS OF GYRATION (Y -Y) j.203 IN 9. TORSION CONSTANT 7.787 IN -4 10. POLAR RADIUS OF GYRATION 2.557 IN NOTES: 1. 7" ROLLED GUTTER IS FABRICATED FROM ALUMNIUM ALLOY 3004-1-136. 2. ROLLED GUTTERS ARE PROVIDED CUT TO LENGTH. 3. TYPICALLY USED TO SUPPORT DECK BETWEEN COLUMNS. f`oj�,- 1b, �Ie--,,, 4 4. SECTION PROPERTIES ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. MEMBER DESIGNS ARE OFTEN GOVERNED BY BUCKLING OR DEFLECTION AND THE FULL SECTION CAPACITY MAY NOT BE DEVELOPED. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION 43-5000 7• Rolled Gutter gI M X 3.000" Y X 1 rll%l Sa 0.110" SECTION VIEW ISOMETRIC VIEW SECTION PROPERTIES: 1. AREA 1.272 SOUARE INCHES 2. WEIGHT 1.530 POUNDS PER FOOT 3. MOMENT OF INERTIA (X -X1.773 IN^4 4. SECTION MODULUS (X -X_1.182 IN -3 5.RADIUS OF GYRATION (X -X1.181 IN 6. MOMENT OF INERTIA (Y -Y)1.773 IN -4 7. SECTION MODULUS (Y -Y) .182 IN" 3 8. RADIUS OF GYRATION (Y -Y) .181 IN 9. TORSION CONSTANT 3.545 IN -4 10. POLAR RADIUS OF GYRATION. -1.670 IN NOTE 1. 30 BOX TUBE IS AN EXTRUDED SHAPE FABRICATED FROM ALUMNIUM ALLOY 6005-T5. 2. MAXIMUM STOCK LENGTH IS 24'-0" 3. TYPICALLY USED AS A COLUMN. 4. SECTION PROPERTIES ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. MEMBER DESIGNS ARE OFTEN GOVERNED BY BUCKLING OR DEFLECTION AND THE FULL SECTION CAPACITY MAY NOT BE DEVELOPED. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION 60-0000 3x3 Box Tube Introduction This manual provides technical information for Bollew's Products. However, you Will often find that a variety of products can work in many applications when you consider spon, wind or load—carrying capacity, and design constraints. Boffew`s, with support from Britt Peters & Associates con assist in choosing the bet system for your specific application. Contact us for help with any of the fallowing; • System selection • Product selection • Building deportment calculations sealed by a professional engineer Shop.ng • Help with on site application problems The data contained in this manual is intended to be informative and accurate. However, it is to be used as a technical guideline only and does not replace the judgments and designs of a qualified architect and/or engineer. Bollew's and its engineer do not replace or accept the responsUity of the design professional of record for any structure. However, BolieWs with support from Britt, Peters & Associates, Inc. con provide site specific design and drawings within the following states in which they ore registered as Professional Engineers: Aloborno Iowa New Hampshire Tennessee Arizona Kansas New Jersey Texas Arkansas Kentucky New Mexico Utah Colifornio Louisiono New York Virginia Colorado Maryland North Coroiino Washington Connecticut Michigan Ohio West Virginia Florida Minnesota Oklahoma Wisconsin Georgia Mississippi Pennsylvania ing Idoho Missouri Rhode Island Illinois Nebraska South Carolina Indiana Nevada South Dakota Neither Bollew's nor Britt, Peters dr Associates, Inc. SHALL BE LIABLE FOR INCIDENTAL AND CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY SUSTAINED, or for any loss caused by application of these for other than the intended use. Bollew's liability is expressly limited to replacement of defective goods. We reserved the right to change data, table, or charts shown herein without notification. 1. This Design Manual was Developed in accordance with the "Aluminum Association Specifications For Aluminum Structures, 2005 Edition* and the American iron And Steel Institute 'Cold -Formed Steel Design Manual, 1996 Edition". 2. Design criteria utilized in the design of this manual is as follows: Gravity Loods: Gravity loadings act downward only. Dead Load: Self *eight of canopy members The maximum snow* or rive load is presented in the tables within the manual. Wind Load: Wind loadings ore calculated per ASCE?-05 and the maximum allowable wind speed is reported in the tables within the monuolos. Deflections: Deck- Spon/60 Beoms: Spon/120 Building Importance Factor: 1.0 Design criteria shall be verified with the local building official. *The loads presented shall be compared to the flat roof snow load plus the rain on snow surcharge food as defined in ASCE7-05. Where canopies or awnings ore adjacent to other structures consult With a professional engineer to evaluate the effects of drift prior to using the tables of this manual. #* Wind exposure C shall be used unless on exposure 8 con be verified by a professional engineer. If the structure is located in a flat, unobstructed area or near a large body of water or on on isolated hill consult With a professional engineer prior to using the wind food tables of this manual. 3. The material thickness used in design is actual metal thickness. The listed bore metal thickness on all these tables must be the minimum field delivered bore metal thickness. 4. It shall be the respontibiTity of the building permit holder to contact a professional engineer to evaluate the adequacy of existing structures to which the canopy or owning is connected. 5. Tabulated information is based on criteria identified here in and precluded to exclusive use of materials supplied by Bollews Aluminum Products. Consult a professional engineer for special design considerations, local considerations, codes, splice locations, non uniform looding, concentrated foods, snow drifting, partially enclosed situations, web crippling, importance factors other than 1.0, wind exposure factor D, connections to wolfs, dynamic loading, seismic design, other requirements and additional information not included in this manual. 6. Fasteners shall be: a. and 3/8" diameter bolts shall be 300 series stain less steel or golvonitzed ASTM A307 bolts; b. diameter or greater bolts shall be galvanized ASTM A325 bolts. c. All bolts shall be installed with washer under the bolt heads and nuts. d. All bolt holes sholl not be more than 1/16" larger than the boft diameter. e. 114 stainless steel self topping screws, hex head, cadmium Ploted, with 5/8" diameter composite aluminum -neoprene washers (0.05' minimum aluminum thickness) 7. Section properties ore for information only. Member design is governed by buckling or deflection in many cases and full section capacity may not be developed. 8. Dissimilar metals must be separated by pointing with bituminous point or other acceptable cooting, or neoprene gasket material to prevent galvanic action. 9. Canopies ore not designed to be enclosed in any way. 10. This manual is for information only. Actual building designs shall be reviewed by a licensed engineer for local conditions, codes, and requirements. 1. The following a summary of material properties for products specified in this design manual. For further material information refer to Part 4 of the 2005 Aluminum Design Manual and port of the 2002 AN Cold-Formed Steel Design Manual. 2. Aluminum May 3004-H36 A. Tensile Ultimate Strength-, Flu = 35 KSI B. Tensile Yield Strength Fly = 28 KSI C. Compressive Yield Strength __Fcy - 25 KSI D. Shear Ultimate Strength_________fsu = 20 KSI L Compressive Modulus of Elosticit, E = 10,100 0 3. Aluminum Alloy 6005-T5 A. Tensile Ultimate Strength RU = 38 KSI B. Tensile Yield Strength ty = 35 KSI C. Compressive Yield Strength = 35 KSI D. Shear Ultimate Strength _Fsu = 24 KSI E. Compressive Modulus of Elosticit = 10,100 KSI 4. Aluminum to 6061-T6 A. Tensile Ultimate StrengUL___________ytu = 38 KSI B. Tensile Yield Strength — ly, = 35 KSI C. Compressive Yield Strength --icy = 35 KSI D. Shear Ultimate Strength Fqi i = 24 KSI E. Compressive Modulus of Elosticit = jo,100 KSI 5. Aluejnurn Alloy 6063-T5 A. Tensile Ultimate Strength Flu = 22 KSI B. Tensile Yield Strength16 KSI C. Compressive Yield Strenqtl`I_.___,_,,__ = 16 KSI D Shear msu = 13 KSI E Compressive Modulus of Elasticity . . . . . . j = 10.1oo KSI 6. Alumitnurn Alloy 6063-T6 A. Tensile Ultimate Strength tu = 30 KSI S. Tensile Yield Strength Fly = 25 KSI C. Compressive Yield Strength cy = 25 KSI D. Shear Ultimate Strength Fcn = 19 KSl E. Compressive Modulus of Elasticity--,,,,,,, = 10,100 KSI 7. Sheet Steel ASTM AlW8 A. Tensile Ultimate . 48 KSI B. Tensile Yield Strength rV = 30 KSI C. Modulus of Elasticity = 29.ODD KSI Alt NOW ir+"+�I . d5 • r � 7x� ..rlb z O a_ Z NLLI J U w z Q W p J a. H N El W x U En J H A � a W U W W ��n a b a� 't3 0� .0 N C > a U O O V) O E N i U ZUQ4° 0 Ld Z° w N w W W ~ �ooroU O 0° Z + Q r O ° O D w o N U O J �Q-z w �oIr 2 Z a a > LO O Q � W J i I I o M.18£.0I000N 00'86 �O (110Id) IuawaSeg ,0l ------------------------------ 0 -------------------------O - Vr..'.._..� a o `r ' 01013UOD 6'0I rnr•: -•• 0.61 L'LZ 00 6'91 o f...._.._ 0'ZI 8 6 y b S• I__. a �g 4. S N O N D w= B w oo 000 0 Ln 42 0O w i ; O / i N w w w i a Z,bZ p In r, o DA11CI Ww ! •� _• - L �.� - �- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a (lL'ld) ivawaseg .0i f 00'86 M..8£.0Io00N 'M'02I .OS IaaalS Sww!S Z£6£ o ° a N N co a � = N Q y a cLE OL N Q� E E - ppN - - - 2Q T — CL 0X� � dor N fn ro a� 3 J = co w N (b U a . C GJ m o o m nom= >, wy7 U U5 N N C h 3 E Q = .-. O C o N com U O C O o a E C 8 m m ////,,4) LL i70 -o aY I�a pEN• E L I> y+L- U n � C(D r" _ ;QL'E ro�C d i N N N U -0 ' 3 m a LO: O L c O O O ~' s" 0)a) m E U o ma'XuX do�O a oCA QO . U j u) W � !NQ E Q C L N t (� N j `i Ea�'� moo_ N d- o n. 3 - >O c'l wEt: .� O _ �- o c O+L. C o �a o cc O TW R Q) 45•� - o CL o ro m C C€rr w n E Ctl a > C:o + -t6 C: cu o7U W Y O a Y o �W -0�� N 3 a,E h C c U E ¢ - - O m o r vo ro :F 0) rS��`a - — U»+ a V 3 o m UL0 -§ E-4 TD > E NO o oa _ u C/)� a E �N E -�°�__ C c° QL 28 ° O 0 M)o E .r C v=', i Oi n c`�6 > N C n•>+ EL• E o E.O -D C a o 3S 1] O O tE n N 'o 0) o° CW N U G° O C �' r O C7 Q C V) F .o °U � L OZ 0 O. ° b Na i��m r- rn C3 co 9 00 C> 0 : 0 eq 1� 1� 4I O Ut G) 0 0 1 OOD 00 Lr) U) r- 00 co Cq to cq*N"; 0 r -I o V-4 v 1%4 N 1 04 N ID (7N Ljr) 0 0 0 0 C) o C 0 0 Ln N rn ko �D OOOCONNO C*4 CLn N mC'?1> 9 9 9 9 C3 9 . . . 1� r4 C7 1t't 9 C� C> CXa C3 C7 t 1ft 0 1 Ft I o O0000kowLn r 0 Wwrq Ln -44 ON Ln W 0 m o I W c M m 0 r- Lr) W N N 14 47 t- r -& ,W N 0 : N ( Hm CN 00 Ln m (71 c w E-4 E- .4 z H 0 w tf) E- �10 m U-) W CN to 4 C> -r 0 4h� (n 44 E- CO ET4 mo m 0 t" -4 >4 zw Er � C:l 0;4 E- 44 W W w 0 W E >4 o O�4 E. w , 4 0 (- w -00 r4 rn E�� 5 �O *E-�, U I o r4 0 1 E+0 M w r1l - M H 11 rn --Id E- M M H C) rJ4 w .3 1 .4 H O W O , 4 -NW � w W 0 0 t -D 0 1 1 >4 0 0 z E4 N-4E�M E� 01 r4tf)w4NN u E� EH- U z ;�,, q M(�E�ml � >4 0 Ilz 8 z W z W (n;D of 0 0 9 - W UH E I 0� z -Oorll0 Z 0 14 (1) W M H 0:4 Ln 0 OE-QWQHWE- W 0. rj) OHOM w >4 mo ll� lZI-4Z5 1 p m 1 $4 E�0>40HME-woru wE'r" rnozc�uo 004wu 1 a W u E- E+ w w u E- C4 0 --, H HUi-4 *VW 1 M WH IE. W p mzw I U9:>444W>4Z woo r*j m 00 H8,WH gp�wwmw-- N 0 H E-# W 0 #�c U M C4 f7) t -D 0 1 W E- li 0 1 Cl w W,4 0 a4 "e, C� N E, � E-4 WH 44 t .I Q:D u tCto W z D�PC?G -r XMH OW Q40.1XCH I IPOE- r4K�z P'ZW4. 04FE-40CIMU QOE��-4j::3W >04WHfr 0 E-4 44 0 44 W 0 HP4a.WEO4 U oe� I HHw -4 r -i 00 E#�C 4 W f tw 2 1� 01 HME u w m E -f H 04 f:� .30 z OccW4vH) : 0 0 1 4p4H I x a4wwwx NM4 4a4WXUONaO t 0 nWA4% 1 r-44 W �84�04 WQa4W D4�4WCIC:IP U I Od 10 1 4J 41 04 0 m C14. rn. co- CN- 6n -E4 8 � : it to I to f 4 V-41-4 r-4 r -4 -4 114 V-4 14 ` N N C14 4 N N N N rAd -4 E+4 1 1 N : 11 to iri H 4-) ;.4 (D �4 0 0 0 �4 �4 04 PQ 10 C4� TO 4:4 o �oo 1-4 LLt LU LL Z jouja OWLU OJ C4 U-) uj 0 Cu (D U to cr LU I I ■ 44 ITS i4 ^ .1 0 M ro 114 0 (D �4 N 0 r -I . 0 1-1 OD Ri �4 w 0 �4 N 44 iJ 44 (D 0 >1 I I R? ti 0 44 0 P > 0 C— .r � - " is�5 , 77 04 0 Cd u Ol u P, c0 �4 0 0 0 7L -ii 2 21 44 a) 0 (D 04 10 �4 0 > x 5 114 co rt 44 c e(D ZOz C) 0 4lj 44 '15 r-4 0 > CD , 4-1 > LO 5� -j i D 0 w u N > X > aa 44 �4 y p> 10 >1 0 Q T U) 4�j 'o :.a#(a 4) 0 a4 (D 0 a) 10 10 th �4 0 04 E5 7 113 �4 ja w1 :1a J) r-4 10 ITI �4 > t ra L. 7" zi L. Lu u > E� 72 9 tn 9 u -0 -,1 q) 0 41 w �3 " z z :4 0 > :1 "d -4 -,1 of j n wk> U CC 14 EL ul li 0 44 0) U U 74 -Z -I o til0 > > Eh 7�! -H -4 44 i1) �4 u 41 -H (d > —4 iia Gsi > ti, ya 5e 7E 77a Z (DU) -i "moi C14 T 04 0 a) t -D 72 ij _-C> 94 u 14 Ell> ;o 4 0) -4 -4 O3 Ll �4 44 (d r > W l 10 T 0 —4 0 0rw 3.a t -: I R? ti 0 Case No. WA1416 Date Received 9/12/2014 Related Cases Case Planner White Case Descriptior Request for a 10 -foot side setback variance (100%) from the 10 -foot standard resulting in a 0 -foot side setback for an existing attached carport. AAmdr&1Y IWAvm&t" Name James Zeiger Name GeorganneZeiger Phone (303) 999-7327 Address 3932 Simms St. City Wheat Ridge State CO Zip 80033- ---- Name JamesZeiger Name GeorganneZeiger Phone '(303)999-7327 Address 3932 Simms Sl. City Wheat Ridge State CO Zip 80033 Carrfatcf /�Iar�a�liiory Name JamesZeiger Name georganneZeiger Phone (303)999-7327 Address i3932� SmwSt. City Wheat Ridge State FUD 1 Zip 80033- AVA-C /Mbr= fli w Address 3932 —� Street Sirrns St_ City Wheat Ridge State CO Zip 80033 Location Description Project Name - -- - ------ Parcel No Qtr Section District No Parcel No. 204-01-017 Qtr Section: SE20 DistrictNo.: 3920401017 S E 20 3 Reviws Pre -App Date Neighborhood Meeting Date App No: Review Type Review Body Review Date Disposition Comments Report Public Hearing BOA Q O O 0 0 DrrvorNRair Case Disposition O Disposition Date Conditions of Approval Notes Status Open Res ti Ord 4' Storage. City of Wheat Ridge 09/15/2014 08:01 CDFA WA -14-16 VARIANCE APPLICATION FEE CDA010478 AMOUNT FMSD ZONING APPLICATION FEES 480.00 PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT CHECK: 6642 480.00 TOTAL 480.00 ---------------------------------------- �- City of W heat Ki ge LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29`h Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicant �,� A - • Address 34 1 5..2.,» S+,- Q- Phone_,JC2a_ City 1,JC k3j w. State C,,(oc-,do Zip 'no -q-2, Fax Owner i9tcrwl�.�.,r:�el Address�9�-S..h,.� S t �e� Phone 303 City L,4,4 ,41FA C State LOlotkd,, Zip !6oa33 Fax Contact A.r Address 353 _i ..+✓3s Sr Phone qq9 Z City `,� � ,G State L.I�r,�o Zip So03_- Fax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): S +� Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Please refer to submittal checklists for complete application requirements; incomplete applications will not be accepted. O Change of zone or zone conditions O Special Use Permit O Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) O Consolidation Plat O Conditional Use Permit O Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) O Flood Plain Special Exception O Site Plan approval O Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Lot Line Adjustment O Concept Plan approval 1% Variance/Waiver (from Section 2G O Planned Building Group O Right of Way Vacation O Other: 2 Detailed description of request: A CA y c s� J-0 L.AA.MLK 71 Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: y 0 m -Sc-, 1 Size of Lot (acres or square footage): c � Rig Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Current Use: s nG (� -TA✓`�. 4-v s, e L L,9 Proposed Use: 5 1 11!1 Arv.. I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best ofmy knowledge and that in filing this application, 1 am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power -of --a orney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Notarized Signature of Applicant State of Colorado JAMES BALSAMO County of } ss NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO The fore oing instrument (Land Use Processing Application) was acknowledged NOTARY ID 20144027322 this of 444 , 20 1 by 3 , MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 11. 2018 y Public p - y commission expires t / 1 /20J-0 To be filled out by staff- Date received Comp Plan Design. Related Case No. Fee S wob Receipt No. Zoning Pre -App Mtg. Date Case No.WA—mf Quarter Section MN 4 Case Manager KAF—rA ED AT-