Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-13-20city 0 COMMUNiTy DEvELopmENT I I TO: Ken Johnstone FROM: Wade Sanner DATE: 12/17/13 SUBJECT: Administrative Variance for 10745 W. 35 "' Place (WA- 13 -20) The variance request was withdrawn and the Building Division took over permitting for the garage addition. City of Wh6a gc TO: CASE MANAGER: CASE NO. & NAME: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT Board of Adjustments DATE: November 13, 2013 Wade Sanner WA -13 -20 / Nylund ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 35.5% front yard setback variance from the 25 -foot requirement resulting in a 16 -foot front yard setback for construction of an attached garage on property zoned Residential -2 (R -2). LOCATION OF REQUEST: 10745 W. 35`" PI APPLICANT(S): OWNER(S): APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING PRESENT LAND USE Keith Nylund Restoration Reality, Inc. 10,716 square feet (0.25 Acres) Residential -Two (R -2) Single - Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Location Map Variance Case No. WA -13 -20 /Nylund JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting a 6 -foot (36 %) front yard setback from the south property line at the residence at 10745 West 35 Place resulting in a 16 -foot setback from West 35` Place. The request for variance is to allow for the construction of a 419 square foot garage addition on the south side of the home, which would direct water runoff that is channeled towards the house to flow around the garage (Exhibit 1, Request). Section 26 -115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of Community Development to decide upon applicants for administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the standard.) II. CASE ANALYSIS The applicant, Zaga Neighborhood Design, is requesting an administrative variance on behalf of their client, Keith Nylund of Restoration Realty for the property at 10745 West 35` Place. The property is located in the middle of the block between Owens Street and Nelson Street on West 35` Place. The property is unique to the other homes along West 35` Place as the orientation of the home is skewed at a 45 degree angle on the lot. Due to this angle, the corner of the garage rests against the front yard setback while the garage sits back farther in the lot. The homes and garages along West 35` Place all are built up to the 25 -foot front yard setback. According to the Jefferson County Assessor, the lot has an area of 10,716 square feet (0.25 acres) and currently contains a 1,249 square foot single family home. The property is zoned Residential -Two (R- 2), a zoning district which provides a high quality, safe, quiet and stable low to moderate - density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature which are incompatible with the residential character (Sec. 26- 209.A). The current single family home is permitted in the R -2 zoning district (Exhibit 2, Zoning). The single family home is located in the center of the rectangle lot and is oriented at a 45- degree angle in the lot. The ranch style home was constructed in 1957 and is part of the Rolling Hills Subdivision. The property is embedded in a residential neighborhood. The current building coverage on the property is 15.2 %, well below the 40% maximum lot coverage R -2 standard. Surrounding properties are all zoned R -2. The proposal would increase the garage size from 327 square feet to 419 square feet, an increase of 92 square feet. Based on current records the front property line is not at the edge of the asphalt. West 35` Place is approximately 25 -feet wide. According to the subdivision plat of the property, West 35` Place is not completely built out and a 50 -foot wide ROW exists. This ROW extends past the listed property line and extends approximately 12.5 feet from the asphalt (Exhibit 3, Right -of -Way). Current setback from the ROW is 31 feet. Variance Case No. WA -13 -20 / Nylund The property owner is requesting the garage extension to alleviate flood concerns with the property. The finished floor elevation of the house is substantially lower than the ROW elevation. With the house being angled on the lot, the drive currently directs water right into the house. The applicant feels that if they were able to pull the garage forward into the setback, he would be able to direct the water around the home. Vehicle A ccess The applicant would remove one access point from the horse-shoe drive to create a single access driveway from West 35x' Place. The single drive access would decrease the amount of paved surface on the south east comer of the property to aid in drainage. Public Notice Responses During the 10 day public posting period 2 adjacent property owners contacted the city in regards to the variance public posting: Adjacent Neighbor 2: Staff was initially contacted b the property owner, Adam Marshall, at 10742 West 1 � 35 Place when staff visited the site on November 6'� ' 2013. When staff returned to city hall after the site visit, the planner contacted the Building Division to inforni them that work was occurring on the house. A building inspector immediately went to the property and issued a stop work. order on the site. The following day, on November 7"', the applicant came in to city hall and paid the required fees for unapproved work and got the necessary permits for the site, pending the variance request decision. On November 1 0 11 , staff was contacted by Adani,Marshall via email. requests for the following reasons A V'�triance CaseAlo. ITA-13-201 A?yh(nd Mr. Marshall objected to the variance k] If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use as it would continue to function as a single family home. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. Homes along the north and south side of West 35"' Place are uniform in their alignment within the 25-foot setback With the 9-foot encroachment in to the front yard setback, the proposed garage is the m only hoe that would protrude out and would be very noticeable along the street. This encroachment would alter the character of the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The proposed garage addition is a substantial investment in the property which would not be possible with current zoning setback regulations. The applicant is in the process of fixing the house to sell it. The primary reason for the variance request is drainage concerns with the property. Other investment options for water runoff mitigation could be pursued that would not require a setback variance request. Variance 4 Case N6, 11 A-1 - 20 / Nylund Staff finds this criterion has not been met 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. While the size and shape of the property is not irregular, the location of the home on the property creates a unique hardship. The house sits just below the street ROW, and the house is skewed at ail angle. This orientation of the house limits the ability to add to the home within required setbacks, However the lot's physical surrounding are not unique to the property. The lot is a regular rectangle shape. The topographical conditions are not specific to the property. All the homes along the north side of West 35' Place are on a similar slope y with 0 similar lot sizes and shapes. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having a interest in the property. The alleged difficulty or hardship for the property is self-imposed. The difficulty to build on the home is due to its orientation in the lot. In adding further living space in the back of the garage, the applicant could have looked at further options to extend the garage into the backyard to the north. An extension to the north could have alleviated the need to extend the garage in to the front yard setback. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and is not expected to injure neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result Variance Case No, RA-13-20 / Nylund of this request. It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the properq The homes along West 35"' Place are on all on a slope. Due to this slope, water runs off the properties to the north. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Accessory structures in residentially zoned districts are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not as )licable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to fence design within public parks. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with a majority of the review criteria, staff recommends DENIAL of a 35.5% front yard setback variance from the 25-foot requirement resulting in a, 16-foot trout yard setback for construction of all attached garage on the property at '10745 West 35"' Place. Staff has found there are circumstances attributed to this request, but these unique circumstances are not substantial to warrant approval of the variance. Therefore, staff recommends denial for the following reasons: The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 1 The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. lZariance 6 Case Alo. TVA-13-.20 1N),lund 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. Post Variance Actions Variance Case No. IE4-13-0I N,yItmd EXHI l� Restoration Rclil N hic, g «, «Ekle lA Case No. 111,4-13-201A�vlund RE: 10745 W 35"' Mace Variance Request Below please find our responses to the Variance Criteria: Kirirince 9 Ceise No. TVA- 13-20 / Nilund mm"Mi VkHm"T2 pr14 M OF so W INARRANTYCEEV P"ariance 10 CaseNo. 11"A-13-20INylund afiF 04 M, T oo KUMM REW 10 R Roorwav cmwwaa IDSWIT a cf Qv" n womswi- mnly mommmoomho rrF MD mom Do Ems =2 M W, " Wso am sot." 0 vw- CAnwq rwqw %l' t Vlollv Od" C rmv and CWMMV UM °x To punw, on aK Ong. kowen si me me pwou 1"M "o� MW W1 :he, C",ax`a'X 0JOe"S""I"n ar c State& cz coac'lv M"OWWWWNS W he '!a spolavo, Rom 4A., P' = "" wl� I owl up WA A ;M IMK Trc '.: a a t 9 :mx"; an me wmn M ww r Tom, an IS me we ly-It f t1{n ,.N q, qW,'*-'o - ,r ' wwr n a'w , a, to "Imned " nMMvW ag4EI 10 HUL M4 d PTI - s i k deqv" Oad " n" jm - em"ooa ' A 0 raw f ha ws .0 xMM"O L Tas "n - .0 00 0 an Voi , t r ;Mnve Y A WWI "v71 ow W man a M. a In v €" S l om & Uv X""K xD0116, a We g. n XAM16 31 W"y to away C "S xs # 4 t vme,I { , ngh' am MIY" amw an &W mmad WA kh 5 Y v �7m Si d AV W- 0 ow WC c'aa Ia'oa 1 c, 11k r.10 aw Ira """"I "M cay. M ""own rawav wt wo "e ow, n� FRA A Am Asso *,,A a am eAn Mau . PeSWA out v p swc-v— � : W W.W "Mm "M go U ;"Q- . DAM cww"' jUtjt 2198 n's r wo no oat mn� k a carm man Lnx n MW s.W ON "M fo P"ariance 10 CaseNo. 11"A-13-20INylund IMPIZO\17 EMENT LOCATION CERITIFICATE ji, Into, 'i , POLLING HILLS SVHDJVWW SITVATE IN' THE' NWt SECTI()N 2n, I'OWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 6�8 WFS'L OF THE SIXTH PUNCIPAL MERIDIAN, cm.;vry OY JEFFERS'ON, STATE OF COLORADO . ............. w.... BLOCK 4 . . W 35th Pl. 50'ROW .. ..... . ..... _ m. „_ . ... IMPROVEMENI LOCAMN CERTWICATE 3 f M”' t KEp"j Ny$ 4,w-lo Pu, p',) S,w, As y,'m" 04 Et ry P 61-IM M 01-1`1 ty.t Plve Ifl N-1-11'1 401-1 ane 0"m vweR of wl, rt1WL M 4 ,111S15lq 01 t,—WWIV, I raq W-"r, 0, I'M 41011 Engineering ,A 14AA 91 ( KEITH NYLUND Surveying LOT 5 8LFCK 4 BOLT NG HUIS SUDDWSft)N AF Tomicht Road Franklown Col 801)6 VVHEATM[N Ctlt(,IRAf,)0 303 660--1 iep --------- .. ......... .. w„ ate lamil a t I, � Mariance I I Case No. TY4-13-2011YvIund 1 -:1 "5 r 1 1:1 S^ �, � C_ I , �'r C F�ROFOE;E b�T'E Ire tiance 12 Case Ala 11 ll vlund \ \ <� \� <� \� \� .� .� � � � � \ } 0 }2§ / .. .. ... . . . ( .. �. .��: fa < .2. . . ... 13 + N.T dye ZN!&nJ Property Address. 10745 W 35TH PL. {3wne:r Narne 5 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 IRESTORATION REALTY INC Mad €inn Address: 07986 S RGSLYN WAY CENTENNIAL CO 80117 Nedghhorhood, 2403 ° APPLEWt OD VILLAGES, PROSPECT VALLEY AREAS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Subdivision Nwre: 648400 - _I I Itv lii6j, Assessor Parcel MaEs As swateGd with Sche dule PROPERTY INV NTORY Property Type: RESIN Year Bu0t: 1957 Adjusted Yew 8edddt: 1957 L2eslgnE Ranch Improvement Number: 7 v` S - 11 e iate ;ate Amount Oeed T � e Rece :1S6r5 11 i&U9UL- 04. "299£9 0 S ecda9 Warrant, Creed 10 "1.990 96,000 Trustees Deed 9 , y 08. 07.2013 0 Warrant teed IL I� IL- TAX INFORMATIO littp: //jcf`lcti. do , ,1 sch .0490 T -1tr fiance 14 Ctise No. ff" A-13- 0 I A,'t°Pund r � EXHIBIT 2: ZONING Variance 15 Case No. WA -13 -20 /Nylund EXHIBIT 3: RIGHT-OF-WAY PL-- .. a ip 1 c 16 CaNcAo. A1-hold EXHIBIT 4: HOME ALIGNMENT These pictures illustrate the uniform alignment along West 35` Place to the south. All the homes align with one another and have similarly large setbacks along West 35 Place. A 9 -foot encroachment of the setback and the close proximity of the garage to the street would stand out in the neighborhood. Variance Case No. WA -13 -20 /Nylund EXHIBIT 5: TOPOGRAPHY 10790 10750 10700 106BD..._ - j 10610 1078.5 10785 10745 10705 10705 10684 106 M PL o�6ao 10762 10742 107 W 10710 �% 10692 ,0662 The lot at 10745 West 35`" Place highlighted in blue. Topographic lines overlaid with parcel layers in GIS show a ridge that runs along the properties that are north of West 35` Place. Variance Case No. WA -13 -20 / Nylund 'XHIBIT 6- NEIGHBOR OBJECTION Nr�- M From: Adam MarshaR <a,marshaH,76@9rnafl,com> Sent. Sunday, November 10, 2013 913 PM To: Wade Sanner Subject. Case of WA 43 -20 lt ruce to meet you the other day. My wific and I are excited to see improvements, he made to tile property. It adds to the revitalization ol'this older neigii1yorhood and everyone's property values, Howeve I have sonic concenis about the requested variance fi the garagc, 1. No other house on the block or adiacent blocks for that matter stick out that nruch towards the street, Aesthetically it doesn't match and contribute to the open feel and flout of the *trecl. As it sits right novv the house already stews closer to the street than the other houses oil the block that sit back 40 feet or so, 2, Rea(Ijusting the layout wif] rettuire the'll to alter tire U-shaped driveway, All o me tither homes on the. street have driv a ewys that face o w ne anoth L.ikc1v there ill In longer , y entrance across Belli oul r b c a dr v i cl� , a ' entranec, My concern is that the area across ti our driveway will become idea street parking vvilich would create a hazard tor safeiv backing out of my drivewav, I am okay with a sirral Icr variance, like 3 feet but not tile size that is being requestc Thank yOu for your consideration, Adam Marshall 10742 W 35th PI Wheat Ridge CO 8003, I Veir-itinee CaxeNo. TVA -1 3- 01 Al vlund 19 Rase No, St{Al 3M ,: D ,9e Received ' iQ:l Est i3 Re ed Cases `. _.,. CAM pla"r San net Cate Deac+ R 0 W f0 Sent" varim'w,^.e from ttree � #oot rapvu . resu�u>8 ire a 1Sanct kroFd se+aack {� canctsucticres .� red a maavd owege on... p osmoty zoned P'Z hs d�.�W'PxrPUVmvra»a Nouns K.OhNy N :. Owe V201323-5917 Acid,eis ,79 's R6 Way .. Cky Canfemwet :.. State CO ' ZP 901i2• Neu . Ksth N3 1 Nww .. 24720) 323D9i 7 Ar3d¢e*ss COY : Cod $tate to ZO 66112� ... Name ack., W"hert N .. FMvirvc ('.t3j 937E 22 . . Address 3828W VMAva Ctp Derwet 5tata 'Co zai P3xrjatc�tP '!r: rAdd,rxx 5t#745 Simet: W i5thA CAY :Who* Akto State co , dip iocetian P3atenpkian . . - ;Project New �. .._ o'c u u ectrnr} ., P eeBNo 392£3�NW29 3 39282 -ft2 t Qtr Sest>i m' NoQlt ... Ddhid No.. F }t 3 ti, ,t. Pre App Date .. :NoV "M Date: App No Pe"eeui Type µ Revow 8od,7 Ramwoate DjapWAM ��.. C _ :; R t r Aeeaevr G+XSP.mar.*!a Case Dt .' ._ .. .... � Dispovskm Date . Crruk"m of AMovai .: .:. „ ;..... .. ..: , .:, ... .. ., . Notes: _ ; . ... ' .-.s opm Roo k Crap € Sttxaga' i!�� CITY W IKAT RIDGE 1 d- t to R estorati o n Re alty R ECEI PJ NOICDA s: 140 M"T FMED ZONING d zone a5 KY¢ pF, Location of request (address): on Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Pleave refer to submittal checkfistvjor complete application requirements; incomplete applications will not be occepteti. CI Change of zone or 7-one conditions CI Special Use Permit 0 Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) 0 Consolidation Plat 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) 0 Flood Plain Special Exception 0 Site Plan approval 0 Temporary Use, Building, Sign x-, ^ 0 [,or Line Adjustment 0 Concept Plan approval Variance/Waiver (firom Section 0 Planned Building Group 0 Right of Way Vacation O Other: rument (Land Use,Proce�ss���) was acknowledged day of 20j by Jk6Qn - 1 4 � Notary'44tb�­' My commission expires A2t; / To be filled out by staff: Date received Conip Plan Related Case No. Fee S Re C-elpt No. z ZA- onin Pre Mtg. Case No.- -- — Quarter Section M ap . Case Manager__ City C 3MMt iP f 1"4 Dr _ot' City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 20 Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 -8001 P: 303.235,2846 F: 301235.2857 Submittal Checklist - "'Variances administrative and non-ad Ivc Project a 1! Fee Paid. Ramm www.ci.whtatridge.co.us Wade Sanner From: Adam Marshall <a.marshall.76@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 9 PM To: Wade Sanner Subject: Case # WA-13-20 It was nice to meet you the other day. My wife and I are excited to see improvernents being made to the property. It adds to the revitalization of this older neighborhood and everyone's property values. However, I have some concerns about the requested variance for the garage. 1. No other house on the block or adjacent blocks for that matter stick out that much towards the street. Aesthetically it doesn't match and contribute to the open feel and flow of the street. As it sits right now the house already seems closer to the street than the other houses on the block that sit back 40 feet or so. 2. Readjusting the layout will require them to alter the U-shaped driveway. All other homes on the street have driveways that face one another. Likely there will no longer be a driveway entrance across from our entrance. My concern is that the area across from our driveway will become idea street parking which would create a hazard for safely backing out of my driveway. I am okay with a smaller variance, like 3 feet, but not the size that is being requested. Thank you for your consideration. Adam Marshall 10742 W 35th PI Wheat Ridge CO 80033 City of WheatF<idge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. WA -13 -20 DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS: 1 , residing at Keith Nylund (name) 10745 W. 35` Pl.. as the applicant for Case No Public Notice at (address) WA -13 -20 hereby certify that I have posted the sign for 1 0745 W. 35`' Pl. (location) on this 10th day of November and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for ten (10) days prior to and including the deadline for written comments regarding this case. The sign was pos eon the position shown on the map below. Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Community Development Departmen for this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file. MAP �of Wheat -Midge PUBLIC POSTING REQUIREMENTS One sign must be posted per street frontage. In addition, the following requirements must be met: ■ The sign must be located within the property boundaries. • The sign must be securely mounted on a flat surface. • The sign must be elevated a minimum of thirty (30) inches from ground. ■ The sign must be visible from the street without obstruction. ■ The sign must be legible and posted for ten (10) continuous days prior to and including the deadline for written comments [sign must be in place until 5pm on Monday, July 1", 2013] It is the applicant's responsibility to certify that these requirements have been met and to submit a completed Posting Certification Form to the Community Development Department. City of Wheat jp d ge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29 Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 -8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE October 31, 2013 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA- 13 -20, a request for approval of a (35.5 %) front setback variance from the 25 -foot requirement resulting in a 16 -foot front setback for construction of an attached garage on property zoned Residential Two (R -2). The attached site plan identifies the location of the variance request. The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than a fifty percent (50 %) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adiacent property owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303 - 235 -2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on November 9, 2013. Thank you. WA 1320.doc www.d.wheatridge.co.us Site Plan Request for approval of a 35.5% front setback variance from the 25 -foot requirement resulting in a 16 -foot front setback for construction of an attached garage. IM1 S'T 1.04'ATf i IN (I'TTI F'Ia ATE tl•7 r. rir111 .1 ,'.1 o^1a7T !x - na xiN m*. !a �:.r� :� nl rily:l rt• W. - I ra ryn ids," rNWVU UMBUs %IATt f.r BLOCK 4 Proposed Giff a S O' RYIP r r i InQlrr•rnnR F SurrcrTnjr If1<O'twd,& 7411 1 7 - ri•111! i .-.n -�•urr r..r.. r +. »..+- � ++ .r....r �. •!,.' +rasa •.�►�r. w.a ..r..�r�sat �-- I . 1.a� '�.1 �r .- �.. F'. �.Trl�.w � :• rll ..���... e��oi q!'•M rv�1.T.AV,��.. 1yJ .. ►�- .�i�r� �•�•l �w �•. r'�Tt ��'�Mr'.\ 1�0 1Yi Y ••'r'�1 t� •'w r.le \ 7 rIR. r.!'w a ! .1 n rl.�1 rtir•T f ...r:w R r't / V> Italr Kt1 x'57 1ri! }R .efa e��. Mr��A }y.RYM1a.a fl T�� J°'^•r••� — �7i N.k M're hti rf.M 1 MARSHALL A DAM $ HALL MARILYN e SHAN AHAN KELLY A HALL THOMA ? 1 0742 PL 10765 W 35TH , WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 800 « «■t 2! 0002 5547 4373 «# #f 2 820 0002 5547 4380 �...� .�.. ,, , . ■ RI DONOVAN 10705 W 35 PL ^,E„ _ P HYLLIS W. RIDGE CO ||■. WHE AT R O 80033 : « «- 2820 0002 5547 4410 °$ »f «� ©# # # #? : »■2 Ell 03520 7 62 \ } ! 0 10662 s sit 03525 1 0 1 1 NELSON ST- Restoration Realty 111C. 10/ IN N) I I Salt MOM 7%6S Sri„ NnV&' (11 to Mawuolgc To whom it may c L K61 M WK I by O sk" 4 !Qqmwkn WE W% My Ana fhAp u) m,", oti mir bell"Illf mganhng thy rcqtwq Q wrhwc a 10745 'M 35" 11"m %%Ttw"Vfp", (Th Anj fu"WrywoNow or dad%Oon im bv dirt" to mc dilvi-tiv, ITankaw! Kekh Ny Yrid Vice PV611011 Now"Wum :11101, p jamXj ISO", A w' , 7986 1; Res!"i Way, (Vriumnid, CA) SOI 12 P. i20,323.5917 F. 720.38').7287 olwolmm= MEM I in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. I f Y E)06rl WOU5E „ 4r 3,c tE TO REMAty 32 N EW M gAT EXPANSs` I4 2 2V 5F GAP-AGE w" DOION: AtE EF !j TU7A DING CC7oE RAC.E� 234 5F 1 s I 201 BF 321 SF , GARAGE ADDMON I � REMOVED p 1 # EX SS N* ? a RiVEW43 F c To 5_ REMOVE, I 5! ° L 4 10269 Tomichi Road Franktown, CO. 80116 303 660-8189 IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that Mrs improvement location Certificate was prepared for KEITH NYLUND, to indicate the distance the existing bulding is from the property fines as shown. I turthe, certify that the improvements on the above described parcel on this date, October 4. 2013, utility connections, are entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, except as shown, Plat there are no encroachments upon the the described Premises by improvements m adi Premises, except as indicated, and that there is no apparent evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening any pal of said parcel, except as shown, EMMMS IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE — LOT 5 BLOCK 4, ROLLING HILLS SUBDIVISION AKA 10745 W. 35TH PLACE WHEATMOGE, COLORADO , Job S ate (late S _:--2�U 13-1050 Wade Sanner From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 8..15 AM To: Wade Sanner Subject: FW: 10745 W. 35th Place Attachments: Rolling Hills Sub,pdf, 10745 W 35th PI-1 to 30.pdf Lauren E. Mikulak Planner 11 Or Phone: 303-235-2845 From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 8:36 AM To: bgCk@za m n rou adesig co _q Subject: 10745 W. 35th Place This email is a follow-up to my phone call last week and in August. In both instances, I left a message with someone in your offices regarding the building permit application for 10745 W 35 Place. setback. UUMM "ity Of wh6atf'�k CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited, If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you, Wade Sanner From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 8:15 AM To: Wade Sanner Subject: FW: 10745 W. 35th Place Lauren E. Mikulak Planner It Office Phone: 303-235-2845 From: Becky Alclaco [beck@zagadesigngroup.coml Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 9:16 AM To: Lauren Mikulak Subject: RE: 10745 W. 35th Place That's great — thank you! I hope we'll get it all resolved this week! From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 9:15 AM To: Becky Aldaco Subject: RE: 10745 W. 35th Place Thanks, Becky. I thought it was best to put it in writing to ensure there was no confusion on what we are looking for. Be well, Lauren E. Mikulak Planner It Office Phone: 303-235-2845 From: Becky Alclaco Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 8:58 AM To: Lauren Mikulak Subject: RE: 10745 W. 35th Place Hi Lauren_ Thank you for your e-mail. I have let our client know they need this document to complete their review. I believe he was getting a survey done last week but I'll forward this to him to make sure it's moving forward. Thanks so much for checking in on this and we'll keep you posted. Becky From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 8:37 AM To: 'Subject: 10745 W. 35th Place S This email is a follow-up to my phone call last week and in August. In h both instances, I left a message with someone in your offices regarding the building permit application for 10745 W, 35 t Place. A -PT--Tr VIM TrTWVOTT I I F sIfFrey is suoml e at con irms Me adffffion meets the 25-foot front setback. Please feel free to be in touch with any additional questions. Thank you, No virus found in this inessage. Checked by AVG - EH3y.avg Version: 2013.0.3408 / Virus Database: 3222/6709 - Release Date: 09/29/13 20130770U1 6) 261201 3:21 PM PG S 1 $11,00 DF$0,00 Orj o I C njr, C'X" WARRANTY DEED IV HIS DEED, made this 7 ' h day of June, 2013, be%vwtv 34MES F. HOWE AND DORIE, E I HO'WE of the County of Jefferson and State of Onk-raco grartor, and RESTORAMN RE,kLrY, INC , A COLORADO CORPORATION ivhoso- lanal Pl1nms', is', 7q S Roslyn Way, Centennial, CO 80112, of She Couity of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, gran holl NIL SSE H, that the grintor for and �n of she surn of l"VVO HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND AND 001100 DOLI A RS tre receipt avid sufficiency of which Is hereey acknowiedged, has granted, barqsi4ied, Sol( anc e nveyel, and by these presents does grant, bargarr, sell, convey and confirm, unto *.he grantee, his heirs arid assigns forever, all the real property togetnar unth irnpraverirenis, if any, situatp, -ying mid txtmg in he County of Jefferson and State of Colorado descriloed as torlows: Lot Five (5), Brack Four (4), Rolling Hills, raw'tv silt( ("), l wili all and singular aopurtenanccs thcroto unk,, a, rri anywise apperlaining, and the revers�orl and revere rtmwlinder used retnaindeis, re "I's, issues rased proUts thereof, and ail the estate, nght, rive, ante Wit, c a cernand whatGoever cf the gramor, either m law or equ4, a', In and to the above oar gained prernises, wnh the herediternerts and appurtenar.cas 0 HAVE', AND FO HOLD the Bald premises zo v z, bargairied anti described, with the appxanances, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, Arld the 9 for hirnse1, his heirs and ocrsonal representatives, ores covertartgrart, tubms nnn lagree to and witn fhc graritee, fair: heirs and assigns, that at the time of enserifing arid deliver th,:�,e ' hresents, he is oli soized n' the ore lures above coriveyed, has good, sure. perlt""cl' ,absolute an feas!ofe estate of inheritance, ir law, in, fee siripte, and has Boob righ', full pow er and iawtu! 3,*; . iza pram, bargain, se,1 an, onvey tha wane in manner and form latoressil, ani that the, same 3 e 4 ree and clow firorn, at "Irri and ather giants, hxga;ns, sales. ;ens, taxes, assess�rlpihs Fn ha and restrictions of whateve kind o nature whatsoever, exoept; qe'ieral taxes for the rumor year and subseluent years subject It) reservatinns, and covenant , ref rc-cotdland except ea3ernents and ngnts, at way of rword, if any, the grantor shall anc? ;will WARPANT ANCY F0P,&"v'P,-,R nEFEND the above-bargalned prern!sea in the so et and peaceable possession of the qrartee iv t'eirs and assigns, against all and every >e sear or persons tav"'fully claxnir U Ile whore or a ny part, t he i'no singular qurrither snaP :nciuce the Plurai inn w_ raa Hie singuisr, and the ::se of any gender shall be aptNicable to MI gendars. IN \CITNESS WHEREOF, the Irartorhas th s caed on Ine date sell fortn above. Ll. STATE OF Colorado C',C)UNTY 0I­,Je7Tt%_<4tQt Tne foregoing rn.stfurnernwas Witnioss any hand and offtdaf seal Nct rf Ubke) My COMMisslo"') Ex gi ros. After recording return to 6fTE OF CoLOW , � PUSLI C, r 0 41 1 pl, 2016 _ J oill * foe',w. 1409076 iNDMOUAL PO DUD glitt, I I Ul) 11 , 11 ITI 1© z - 11 All Fri I I 4 #\ I i 4 � � t