The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4595 Independence StreetCity of Wheat j�idge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. F: 303.237.8929 November 22, 2019 Owner/Occupant 4595 Independence Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2855 RE: Previously permitted project plans available for retrieval — Permit 201800380 (Addition) Owner/Occupant, This letter is being sent to you because a project for which a permit was issued by the City of Wheat Ridge Building Division and plans and/or other documents were required was recently completed and approved. In accordance with the Building Division's document retention policy, the associated plans and/or other documents are scheduled for disposal. We are writing to offer you an opportunity to retrieve those approved plans and/or documents prior to their disposal by the Building Division. The plans and/or documents are available for retrieval for a period of 20 working days (4 weeks) from the date of this letter — December 26th — and must be retrieved in person at the Building Division offices. This letter must be presented at the time of retrieval of the plans and/or documents. Plans and/or documents available for retrieval CANNOT be mailed and plans and/or documents will NOT be available for retrieval after the expiration of the retrieval period. You may retrieve plans and/or documents between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the Building Division offices located at 7500 W. 291h Avenue in Wheat Ridge. Cordially, Kimberly Cook Permit Technician 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2873 Fax: 303-237-8929 www.ci.wheatridjze.co.us City of W heat f Z d_ge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT www.ci.wheatridge.co.us i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: �-qS _TF.dr- Permit Number: !O��OU?U ❑ No one available for inspection: Time T30 Qpm Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303 -234 - Date: ` ��' Z lei, Inspector: Orin{'. r�✓� DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE > �J Inspection Type: '10S F('ni llAe r116.141 Job Address: Permit Number: Z.01$00 -30Q �P a ❑ No one available for inspection: Time Re -Inspection required: Yes lo) When corrections have been made, ca��l..l--for re -inspection at 303 -234 - Date: X12 Z % i Inspector:_ ba,-, P,- 1.0�-(ff DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE 'L/03- t`nca t C 1,rc 11 Inspection Type: 31 n - % c I?1-ager 2 lei Job Address: 9S -47-s— �n d eraen e ACe Permit Number: '201S o D 3 g o ❑ No one available for inspection: Time SAM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes( No When corrections have been made, callyor re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date....I — (CCInspec i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: �1 S Tn c1 G 12 f,-) Permit Number: �(j i'$ (� "� 6 d�� J ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes W When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303 -234- Date: - 03 -234 - Date: 3 Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE l i. - CITY SOF WHEAT RIDGE . Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 310 Job Address: Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: Ti Re -Inspection requiredYe o When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date:.. 'k —� Inspect DO NOT REM' VE THIS NOTICE The City of Wheat Ridge Third Party Form Check List Property Address ts�--', Permit dumber 2 i II? Permit Issued Date Vit -1 - 2a1 W'64' 't' 9r4e " C 0 ee,033 owner Information property owner Information+r'f` �- Property towner Address t`9 �i,� �G4 inspector Information Inspection Company'-Lcxc� inspector Name Inspector Contact info. 3? Inspector Statement and Acknovrledgement I hearty acknowledge the roof I am inspecting is 6112 or over. Ali roofs that are under 6/12 must be inspected by the City of Wheat Ridge Buiding Dept. ' I hearby acknowledge the roofing system for the referenced building has been inspected and found to be in compliance with the miniMum requirements of the 2012 IRG and 2012 IBC as well as all City of Wheat Ridge Policies and Procedure and Manufacturer's recommend*4dj�c,anon Date:j2 j Inspector: _ property Owner Statement of Acknowledgement and I give =1 hearby acknowledge that I am the owner of the budding referenced above oo# inspection my consent for the listed third -party inspection company to perform my of Wheat Ridge g D� i�+ision inspection. /";, _ j,0 -20l,q in lieu of the City Hate: Propery OwnertAgent: This original document and permit card, as well as the roofing check 15t; must be submitted tc the Chief Building official within seven days of the Tina! inspection. Drop off in person Permit c;ourite 2nd floor 7500 W. 29th Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033 t)mft Bate: 7/28117 Please add note to reverse side RECEIVED The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List notes Mid-Roof 0,_ 7- Roof Roof Inspection ❑ N/A ❑ Pass El Fail E] N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Structural roof components ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Flashing for roof and walls ❑ Pass ❑ Fail If new sheathing is installed verify that it is listed in the permit description (Valuation must be adjusted) ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify sheathing nail pattern (See Policy & Procedures) E] N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Crickets and saddles where needed ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify B vent must have boot same gauge as pipe ❑ N/A ❑ Pass [J Fail Verify vent caps ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Step flashing shall be min. of 4x4 piece per shingle E] N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Ice and water shield 2' in heated wall spaces ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Underlayments must follow 2012 iRC / 2012 IBC ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify roof slope for proper drainage ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall have min of 2" overlap ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge should extend down min 2" past roof deck ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall be mechanicaly fastened 12" OC ❑ N/A ❑ Pass E] Fail 90 LB roll roofing shall not be applied to roof slopes less than 2:12 slope: Exception, detached garages, patios, carports, open on three sides with min. slope of 1:12 ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min slope 114:12 slope ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Above roof insulation R-25 ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Below roof residential R-38 ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Below roof commercial R-32 ❑ N/A ❑ Pass E] Fail Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min slope 1/4:12 slope must be installed in accordance with the manufacturers specifications- Must have manufactures letter of warranty with the address on the letter for final inspection Metal Roof Shindies Requirements ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof Shingles shall not be installed on slope less 3:12 ❑ N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof N/A ❑ Pass E] Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min of 8" from the centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow fine with sections overlapping a a min. of 4" Tile Roofs Requirements N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete the shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List notes Mid -Roof Notes Company Flame, Inspector signature: Date of Inspection. The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List notes Final Roof Roof insnection N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ N/A [ Pass ❑ Fail Structural roof components N/A Pass ❑ Fail Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist [Z N/A ❑ Pass (] Fail Flashing for roof and walls ❑ Pass ❑ Fail If new sheathing is installed verify that it is listed in the permit description (Valuation must be adjusted) X N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify sheathing nail pattern (See Policy & Procedures) ` N/A ❑ Pass [J Fail Crickets and saddles where needed N/A [ Pass ❑ Fail Verify B vent must have boot same gauge as pipe U N/A l] Pass ❑ Fail Verify vent caps ❑ N/A [t Pass ❑ Fail Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted ❑ N/A [ Pass ❑ Fail Step flashing shall be min. of 4x4 piece per shingle N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Ice and water shield 2' in heated wall spaces ❑ N/A 1 Pass ❑ Fail Underlayments must follow 2012 IRC / 2012 IBC ❑ N/A [ Pass ❑ Fail Verify roof slope for proper drainage ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall have min of 2" overlap ❑ N/A Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge should extend down min 2" past roof deck ❑ N/A ® Pass ❑ Fail Dripedge shall be mechanicaly fastened 12" OC N/A },L�-, Pass ❑ Fail 90 LB roil roofing shall not be applied to roof slopes less than 2:12 slope; Exception: detached garages, patios, carports, open on three sides with min. slope of 1:12 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min slope 1/4:12 slope N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Above roof insulation R-28 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Below roof residential R-38 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Below roof commercial R-32 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Modified Bitumen, EPOM, TPO min slope 1/4:12 slope must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications - Must have manufacturers letter of warranty with the address on the letter for final inspection Metal Roof Shingles Requirements IN N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less 3:12 N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min of 8" from the centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow line with sections overlapping a a min. of 4" Tile Roofs Requirements N/A ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Clay and concrete file shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment I he City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List notes Final Roof Company Name:- ',(� ` A.461 Inspector signature: Date of Inspection: /� �/ i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 4:-i n G f w 14 daws /,0 0 0'e5 Job Address: 4 51 S /AJ 0 epma-w e S Permit Number: U 1 kGo 3 �d ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM ^�r Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234- Date:- � . (3. 6 Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE I i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE �(303) Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 44 0 q- +'n a! J o o -r Job Address: q S- S' __7_,n Je - n ncE S -)- Permit Number: -a 0/ g o 0-3 4 0 n a I A) O 4 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time = L1 S0y/PM Re -Inspection required: es) No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: l /// ) )1 Inspector: 16 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Budding Inspectiom,Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION,NOTICE ,3'z.a- b" If / � , i �� ar5fu/� Balir� Inspection Type: 31) --•s 1.1,0/1 Job Address: q 4 71 n,�P P., d irr�4,4_ S -f, Permit Number: Z 6*03,00 1 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time q1 z kM%PM Re -Inspection required: Yeses/ When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: ( I /7/ 10 Inspector: bale L4've; DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 305--�n�l�fi�n� Job Address: L{ 54 1 yt1drpf1)df n r, arta Permit Number: u o160038 ' r ❑ No one available for inspection: Time o7 i6t) PAM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date:10/7 6110 Inspector: -T)d,,,r I a ve-it DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: "3 V L R A Ei ate, Job Address: sl sq S Permit Number: 2 0 iia' oy -3 S Q i` ct rn ❑ No one available for inspection: Time '�f = Sal kA—W-PM Re -Inspection required: Yeses% When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date:-/ c ti -IT ) S Inspector: "T6 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE L� A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 1��(303)235-28550ffic Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line e•(303)237-8929Fax sit,- o�ql, i7�ec��it n,r-cn l 313-GZ INSPECTION�NOTIEE� nl ! n. 30L/- Seer WA /I Inspection Type: _301- u2 o u n 4 in ('sic Job Address: !34 -- Permit Number: "D O) S 0 0 3 a c !K oVq F_�Gitil r,/1 e? Pa.r- a U Jr, i,t-- C/ Car- s foci are raene , on .S Uef- �i[f c7 Oa t)V9A Mec T7 vt-cl No one available for inspection: Time `� = %� A /PM Re -Inspection required: Ye No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date:-/ o / -0 / 8 Inspector: Tfl DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type:�� Job Address: L�� f? tie% f%l 1 Permit Number: 1 0 0.r ❑ No one available for inspection: -Time � AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes t No When correctig(ns have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date:11W0Inspector: f DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ��P�Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line '(303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Vcw/ba 6c, rri,eeL Job Address: 4555 17hjOPDwfl-mc e Sr Permit Number: 20 1 ,:?yC)3,0 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time 6'1 1'�_A4ZPM) t Re -Inspection required: Yes When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date:' t Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: M I c) jai= Job Address: Permit Number: 7 015r00 I �r ❑ No one available for inspection: TimeZIT AM(9 Re -Inspection required: Yes 60) When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: -'7, 73 ' I Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ` Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: �� P j VAA (f '✓kpot� OC -1, `PMF 5k^-4/ �-i Job Address: 1 a I NJCC PeaPjd et)Z P C� f Permit Number: Ab ❑ No one available for inspection: Time 1 PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No } When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234- Date:- �� r Inspector:, DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE hCily of W eat �be COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 FOUNDATION SETBACK AND ELEVATION CERTIFICATION This form, including the Exhibit on the reverse side, must be fully completed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of Colorado. This Certification must be submitted for review and approval prior to the placement of concrete and before proceeding with any further construction. DATE: 9 " S t - ((2::) PERMIT# Z c--) ( --2J0o ADDRESS: 4S9 s LOT -�- ,BLOCKS, �'LL� em -S �Qtc �l�IcICC SUBDIVISION I hereby certify that the elevation and location of the recently constructed structural foundation for the above property described above has been measured by me or directly under my supervision. The foundation setbacks and elevations for all recently constructed building corners as stated herein have been found by me to be in compliance with all civil engineering and Building Permit construction plans as approved by the City of Wheat Ridge. The MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCES from the property lines have been determined to be: FRONT: �=g ,S REAR: (�1, ( SIDE: ((o.O SIDE: 3l The MINIMUM ELEVATION has been determined to be: (\3 X (NAVD88). The above measurements have been determined on the following location: Check only one): N P� Top,9f proposed foundation prior to placement of concrete N � op of foundation subsequent to placement of concrete The Print are identified on the attached exhibit. Date Professional Surveyor FOR FFICE USE ONLY Approved 6 nspe for Date www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Rev 09117 EXHIBIT �i 13,v t9 �tA N? t6 u2'� NOTICE TO SURVEYOR: —�6at6__j 1� N 1. Elevations shall be shown for ALL foundation corners. 2. Foundation corners with minimum elevation and setback distance shall be ideniified. 3. Drawing must be properly oriented (North = top of page). 4. Show the roadway in front of the property. 5. If drawing is to -scale, provide the scale. If not to -scale show as N.T.S. Rev 09/17 i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division �_. r' "(303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Off(ce • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Qj 5 - Job Job Address: `f s- 9 S 1 ,...a e��►,�1�,��`�_ Permit Number: ®) 2� O 0 O ofo o'�- A Weoi it ` 0- -3 F�a ❑ No one available for inspection: Time J / ', P5- &PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: �;- 12 t ( i ,3 Inspector: _ 7, DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE City of Wheat Ridge Residential Addition PERMIT - 201800380 PERMIT NO: 201800380 ISSUED: 04/12/2018 JOB ADDRESS: 4595 Independence ST EXPIRES: 04/12/2019 JOB DESCRIPTION: Two story addition to existing home, 2 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms and a living room - 1,083 sq ft *** CONTACTS *** OWNER (650)861-9128 STANCHEV GEORGI RADEV *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE: UA / Unassigned USE: UA / Unassigned SUBDIVISION CODE: 2002 / KIPLING, I-70 & CLEARCREEK ARE BLOCK/LOT#: 0 / *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED FEES Total Valuation 0.00 Plan Review Fee 802.91 Use Tax 2,423.48 Permit Fee 1,235.25 Engin. Review Fee 150.00 ** TOTAL ** 4,611.64 *** COMMENTS *** PROJECT VALUATION: 115,404.00 *** CONDITIONS *** All roughs to be done at Framing Inspection. Approved per plans and red -line notes on plans. Must comply with 2012 IRC, 2014 NEC and all applicable City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Codes. Work is subject to field inspections. 11 by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications, applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain thispermit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with this,pennrt. 1 further attest that I am legally authorized to include all entities named within this document as parties to the work to be performed a ll work to be perfo wrmed is disclosed in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications. Signature of OWNER or CONTRACTOR (Circle one) Date I . This permit was issued based on the information provided in the permit application and accompanying plans and specifications and is subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures. 2. This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and maybe subject to a fee equal to one-half of the originalpermitfee. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees androcedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of the Chief Budding Official and is not guaranteed. 4, No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a change of the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services Division. 6. The issuance or granting of a pe it shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any provision of any applicable codep4ny ordinancelol regulation of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to field inspection. Signature of Chief BuildinVOfficial Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. I -ity of Wheat Riqgc' -��rc () K`0 U N H Y D F V ELO I I M I N i7*— -1 Building & Inspection Services Division 7500 W. 29'x' Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855 * Fax: 303-237-8929 Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Email" vwheatridge co,u-s 10 -IM I FOR OFFICE USE ON1,Y Date: Y -7/ PlanlPennit # VI) X 10 UU" Plan Review Fee:qu t)A,g $ o Plea&6�6lete Ali highlighted areas on both sl*"�s of this form- livaomplete app4ications may not be processed. Property Add%ss: . 4595 Independence St, Wheat Rid e, CO 80033 Propeity Own$r (please print):Georgi and Danka Stanchevphone: 6�O 61-9128 Property Owner tm ar :r g Adi' (if different than property address) Address City, State, Engineer Build LLC Architect/Engineer -ail: stanchemengg(d)-email .co M (650)-861-9127 Co per. Owner Contractors djtOcer'tAoe 61✓5-c,) Coah actor E-mail Address: S-�Ct-N W Sub Coatrq4, qors: E.Jodrical Licensed Sub: C�ty Lvense P1 Plumbing: W.R. City License # Other City Licensed Sub: City License # Mechanical: W.R. City License # Complete all information on BOTH sides of this form COMMERCIAL ® RESIDENTIAL ❑ NEW COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE El ELECTRICAL SERVICE UPGRADE Q NEW RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE COMMERCIAL ROOFING COMMERCIAL ADDITION RESIDENTIAL ROOFING RESDENTIAL ADDITION El WINDOW REPLACEMENT COMMERCIAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (Garage, shed, deck, etc.) RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (Garage, shed, deck, etc.) MECHANICAL SYSTEM/APPLIANCE REPAIR or REPLACEMENT j PLUMBING SYSTEM/APPLIANCE REPAID or REPLACMENT (❑ ELECTRICAL SYSTEM/APPLIANCE REPAIR or REPLACEMENT QOTHER (Descrlbe)��. fFr1r AL L �rojeci.s please ovir!€, a detarted crest.�, r do Or work to be erforpned, in lulling „urreni Lise of rC CT C"I ct P s, Sv}ihytt% footage, e^XiSt3r3% Cort ... and Tyr ? { c ct7'•`I�Ptit?f , �a ianc size art " ti�nt✓yr•., u 5e . Sq, FtJLF 1083 Sq Ft Btu's Squares Other e (Contract value or the asst of all materials and labor included in the entire Project) 015,404 NN N E:#21t:`O,'i`F1 AC"FOR Si(:;4XCl,`RE OF 1 tiDERS'T'A>NDING, AND ACRE EME'N`' I Iierch\ certitw that the setback distances prop isccl 11% this lac nnit aipplii, iti« tr ;arc° accriraic anti CIO not : iol<atc <jpplicable iwdinan c s, rules of tc,t�ulations Mahe €`its: cit Whcat Ri€lgc or covC11<ii_ " c,tsenlents of. ofrecord: iliat all t casure€teznts Simi%vn and alk:g<1 i(nls made arc . b:iit<,alc: that I h ax -e read and 1?grve to ah l 3'`t:all i onditions printed ern III is applicatiitn and that I assur e Lull rePP II-,ibililly for-MI11hance itl; 'Ipplicable Cit of when Ridge odc,� and ordi€ ance� fiir �,aorli cinder arty penint isstaeci based (=ia 111 Is, application: that l an tine Icoal <3s�ttct` .:c t)ce a h`y the legal o -,k nc: of the i)n)pc;rt, io petliirm the desetibe;d uorL land ain <0so ,ataihorized by the icgA tm i,Cr aa# JM ciitii.,a i:iJudcd on this application to list di,at cntiti on this altpliciitioni C)14-NER (CC):17°RACIC)R) or (At 7`JJ(?RJ1.'!s'I31tL�1�E5'f_'.1 "'-#7It`I) rtf t0i1. `�'R) (C`ONTRACYORj Geor i Stanchev 9210 _. _ _ ...._ .... _.. �v r DEPARTMENT USE CiiVLY ZONING CCMMMEINTS ,r3 J OCCUPANCY CLA SiFICATIONP � Reviewer;...0 1 YPE OF CONSTRUCTION: � SPRINKLERED� No BUIL:;ttS G DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: � OCCUPANT LOAD: Revieaarer. POOL IC WORKS COMMENTS' Reviewerr. NIVW g4KNX, 51-M PLAN 7-0 5�XAA WArAAP- Fire Department [I Received ❑ Not RerUired Water District n Received Not Required Sanitat€oto District E] Received (E] rat Reouired c>9AM1 trI�1t/+ P� 4t' t*bw 9N poo -Lw f �+�t"�' �ty.�,��►rT pa�{��-r'� cit ;tzca�, t t4oq- 6 Building Division Valuation: $_1 ) 51 q Property appraisal system ( Property 47 -_ 1 t IT4,16 WIT "T , J Information GENERAL INFORMATION PIN/Schedule: 300043522 Status: Active Property Address: 04595 INDEPENDENCE ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY AIN/Parcel ID: 39-222-09-012 Property Type: Residential Neighborhood: 2002 - KIPLING, I-70 & CLEARCREEK AREA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Subdivision Name: 391200 - JUCHEM GARDEN PLACE Owner Name(s) STANCHEV GEORGIRADEV STANCHEV DANKA BOEVA Page 1 of 1 Block Lot lKey ISection ITownship lRange lQuarterSection Land S ft 019 OOE 122 13 169 NW 8415 019 JOSB 122 13 169 JNW 5619 [Tota 1 14034 Assessor Parcel Maps Associated with Schedule pmap39-222.1)df PROPERTYINVENTORY Property Type RESID Design: 1 Story/Ranch Item lQualitylNo. Bedroom (Above Grade)Poor 2 Base Bath Poor 1 Number of Units Poor 11 Adjustment Code JAdjustment Sq Ft Forced Air Unit Hea 756 Y Year Built: 1942 Improvement Number: 1 Interactive Map Adjusted Year Built: 1942 Areas Quality Construction Sqft First Floor Poor F 756 Out Shed Poor 215 Covered Porch Poor 58 Land Characteristics Below Avg. Location Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception 12-04-1986 0 Warranty Deed 86162212 10-12-1988 60,000 Warranty Deed - Joint Tenancy 88116886 06-13-2006 0 Death Certificate 2012140201 04-30-2014 0 Letter or Letters 2014065323 06-27-2014 1 146,000 Conservators Deed 2014055123 TAX INFORMATION 2017 Payable 2018 Actual Value Total 200,147 Assessed Value Tota 1 14,410 Treasurer Information View Mill Levy Detail For Year 2018 2017 Mill Levy Information Tax District 3105 County 22.4200 School 42.8780 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIST 0.0000 URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD CONT DIST 0.5000 URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD C SO PLAT 0.0570 ALLEY WATER DIST 0.0000 CLEAR CRK VLY WATER & SAN DIST 2.3140 WHEAT RIDGE 1.8300 ARVADA FIRE DIST 14.7230 otaI 84.7220 2017 http://ats.jeffco.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=043522 02/28/2018 a �w 0 "avow it RESIDENTIAL Building Permit — Plan Review Worksheet Address: 5 'e-�'c � C e V-1 Lot Size: , y 1 (�C�� sq. ft. Zoning: e - I Lot Width: _�_ T ft. Rev. 09/2017 Property in the flood plain? 11 Q If yes, notify PW Floodplain Administrator and add surveying condition FLD Subdivision: f� /c,"_ Any conflict? (Y/N) Related Cases: 1A 10, Type of project (applicable survey conditions in parenthesis): CO:At permit, we need: Survey at foundation: Survey prior to ❑ Accessory ISP, ILC or site plan none if in floodplain (FLD) Addition ILC and site plan if w/in 2' of setback or in floodplain (FND) if in floodplain (FLD) ❑ New ILC and site plan yes (FND) if Win 2' of setback (NRS) if in floodplain (FLD) Maximum Lot Coverage: 4n "Jo % 5 (o t sq. ft. Existing Improvements(footprints): House: S 1 sq. ft. Shed: 2 1 S sq. ft. Detached garage: sq ft. Other: sq. ft. Proposed Improvements (footprints): �u House/addition: -A G 1 S_ 4� sq. ft. o �� Shed: sq. ft Detached Garage: sq. ft.` Other: sq. ft. Total Existing sq. ft Proposed+Existing sq. ft Lot Coverage % Lot Coverage % Required Setbacks: FR o2 S S S 15' R 4� Provided Setbacks: FR ^3 L` S 3 Z S I S__g S R 9 2 For additions or new construction, is the structure within 2 feet of minimum setbacks? 'l If yes, add surveying condition FND. Maximum Height: 3 S ft. Maximum Size: V1 /ct— sq. ft. Proposed Height: S L ' ft. Proposed Size: u. /0 sq. ft. Does the bulk plane apply? (Y/N) If yes, does it meet on all sides (Y/N): FR S S R (See 26-642 and 26-120.C.1 — applies to all single-family structures (new, addition, accessory) in R -1C and R-3) Parkland Conditions Does the permit result in a new dwelling unit (new structure or conversion from non -res use)? If yes, have parkland dedication fees already been paid (eg with a previous land use approval)? If fees are owed, add condition PFEE, notify owner, notify building division, enter fee amount in ADG. Rev. 09/2017 Streetscape Conditions Does the permit result in any of the following conditions? ❑ Construction of new roads ❑ Platting of new lots ❑ New development ❑ Additions that increase gross floor area (not just the footprint) by 60% or more (proposed floor area — existing floor area ) / existing floor area = % increase If any box above is checked... For SF/DUPLEXIs there existing ❑ Curb ❑ Gutter ❑5=ft+ sidewalk adjacent to the property? If curb, gutter or sidewalk is missing, streetscape construction or fees -in -lieu will be required. MULTIFAMILY—Does the frontage meet current city standards? If not, streetscape construction or fees -in -lieu will be required. Fees -in -lieu of dedication or construction are due at the time the permit is issued. Access Conditions (apply to all new driveways, garages, additions, or new homes/units) For one and two-family dwellings, the first 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar materials. ❑ For all uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer than 25' to any property line, except when used as joint access for two or more lots. ❑ In residential zone districts, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 feet in width. ❑ One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the street accesses are at least 30 feet apart, measured from the interior edges. ❑ For all uses, one access point per property is permitted. Landscaping Conditions (apply to additions and new dwelling units) ❑ For one -and two-family dwellings, one tree for every 70 feet of street frontage is required. Frontage of lot -7T - width of drivewaysem-' - / 70 = Y �✓ (round up for required trees) Street trees required: Street trees provided: ❑ 100% of the front yard and 25% of the entire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance of C.O. ❑ In the event that landscaping cannot be installed due to inclement weather prior to the issuance of a C.O., an escrow agreement with financial guarantees may be allowed to ensure future installation. 125% of the cost of the proposed improvements will be required with the agreement. These funds will be reimbursed back to the property owner or contractor once the improvements are in place. Dwelling Unit ❑ Not approved as an independent dwelling unit. i 1 x City of SINGLE FAIMIILYIDUPLEX %r P u t3h1e�,t ` �e BUILDING P L WIC ERMIT APPLICATION REVIE W Date: D Location: ATTENTION: BUILDING DIVISION I have reviewed the submitted application documents to construct a located at the above referenced address. Please note the comments checked below. 1. / Drainage: a. Drainage Letter &Plan required: Yes No b. Site drainage/grading plan have been reviewed and are: ZOK refer to 2. Public Improvements required & to be completed with project: stipulations. a. street paving/patching: Yes No b. curb & gutter: Yes No Completed c. sidewalk: Yes No Completed Completed d. Other (specify): Yes No For items not constructed, the amount of funds taken in lieu of construction: Completed 3. Does all existing roadway/alley R.O.W. meet the standards of the City: Yes No If not, what is required? If R.O.W. is required, has the deed been received: Yes No (see Note below) NOTE: All deeds must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 4. APPROVED: The Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and hereby approves this Permit Application, subject to the stated requirements and/or attached stipulations. Signature Mark Van Nattan Date 5. NOT APPROVED: The Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and does not / approve this Permit Application for the stated reason(s): Signature Mark Van Nattan Date 6. Stipulations: RQDF 0PkAod i7'�_ 7. A Grading Certification Letter from the Engineer -of -Record accompanied by an Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) shall be required prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 8. NOTE: ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AS A RESULT OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED PER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. Rev 04/2016 0011 City of Feat i c 811( WORKS City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857 PUBLIC WORDS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES Date: o Location of Construction: 495 I�IC��L��tiln�wlG �� Purpose of Construction: 5JW._1i _ E ire M 1L..y Single Family Commercial Development Review Processing Fee: ................................................ $100.00 (Required of all projects for document processing) Single Family Residence/Duplex Review Fee: ..................................... $50.00 Commercial/Multi-Family Review Fees: e Review of existing or minimal technical documents: ............... ........ $200.00 o Initial review' of technical civil engineering documents (Fee includes reviews of the I" and 2nd submittals): .......................... $600.00 • Traffic Impact Study Review Fee: (Fee includes reviews of the 151 and 2nd submittals): ........................... $500.00 ® Trip Generation Study Review Fee: .................................................. $200.00 ® O & M Manual Review & SMA Recording Fee ................................ $100.00 Multi -Family o -Mol 1 Each Application will be reviewed by staff once and returned for changes. If after review of the second submittal changes have not been made to the civil documents or the Traffic Study as requested by staff, further reviews of the Application will be subject to the following Resubmittal Fees: a Resubmittal Fees: 3rd submittal ('/z initial review fee) :.................................................... $300.00 4th submittal (full initial review fee): ................................................. $600.00 All subsequent submittals: ................................................................. $600.00 (Full initial review fee) TOTAL REVIEW FEES (due at time of Building Permit issuance) PLEASE NOTE THAT IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE FEES, THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL LICENSING AND PERMITTING FEES REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Rev 12/12 City of P/'� Wheat Ridge BL1C WORKS City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857 NOTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RESTORATION DATED: /6 ADDRESS: Dear Contractor: In conjunction with the approval of the building permit application for the above referenced address, this letter is to inform you that all existing public improvements located along the frontage of said address shall be restored, (if damaged from related construction) to an acceptable condition, as determined by City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Department, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to any construction commencing, the City's representative will conduct an onsite inspection to determine the existing condition(s) of the public improvements at this address. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: File www.ei.wheatridge.eo.us Rev 2/08 LAND S U RV EYING F"u!ENT L^vt_A -10% Cc —IT iCATc. Nate. Ccrtificate is Based on Control as 9bo- An Imp rouctnew Survey Plat is itrcommendcd For Prcxise Location of Improvements, CLPE:'.: sTi`i', FEV_ QgNSTR79T1GN,_ 1:1GaP tNMENCE TREEI. . . ..,__.,... NAME GEORG! STANCFFEV _,._w,,y,, LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PSR C�i C"N^„ [-Sri ATR:i3Etl L -71 -AL DESCRIPTION Now: 1-,o"ion of Fcnce Lith, if Show -rt, axv APPM16mate_ Fence Linc I r tt'e bas=s of my knowledce, infer rla: or` and oelief, I ne!eby cerify that this improvement '0,oat'a certificate :vas . e eC r4„ STAbvCHEv CONSTRUCT=X that it is not a Land Surwwe-y :=f t a: r c ept Survey Plat, and t,:st t S not <L) be relies sratSliS 4 �'._Fenc&, .,..t=drt�, ern fc t t iu tr e ser*, t the i pa ens tt st�ie-�st ? ^i pare= �or -,* ,is date Hoc Lr g� re entirely ',v tl . the amda ies 'i roei' exc t 2 `nown, tna them are no n e ,ts uper :ne 5 v' aaas hV C-l.,'W VeMe to n if1 C nn p�ertnf%eSZ"'pt 'Z''. Inds aiec a h 'r e Is no :a '� c �t evf de G2 ,r ssr �r {fir aee3e n t r, it 17 _�. 5 Robert E. Part; L.5-,15321 o hart jai, Hayden, L.S. 27268 ,� .•--t-C3azck,u _ -�'j –; rs'?FCti_4r.P+1is}.d °S1'."5'i .._._.-. ,. _ tk5te*ey l �. .... .. ru <. ,... z A_ ..... Cl°34'tYi>t' i i r tt'e bas=s of my knowledce, infer rla: or` and oelief, I ne!eby cerify that this improvement '0,oat'a certificate :vas . e eC r4„ STAbvCHEv CONSTRUCT=X that it is not a Land Surwwe-y :=f t a: r c ept Survey Plat, and t,:st t S not <L) be relies sratSliS 4 �'._Fenc&, .,..t=drt�, ern fc t t iu tr e ser*, t the i pa ens tt st�ie-�st ? ^i pare= �or -,* ,is date Hoc Lr g� re entirely ',v tl . the amda ies 'i roei' exc t 2 `nown, tna them are no n e ,ts uper :ne 5 v' aaas hV C-l.,'W VeMe to n if1 C nn p�ertnf%eSZ"'pt 'Z''. Inds aiec a h 'r e Is no :a '� c �t evf de G2 ,r ssr �r {fir aee3e n t r, it 17 _�. 5 Robert E. Part; L.5-,15321 o hart jai, Hayden, L.S. 27268 Georgi Stanchev 4595 Independence St, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Cell: 650.861.9127 stancheveng(a� gmai 1. com March 29, 2018 Mr. Tardif, 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Please see below the responses to your review questions: Please provide a stair detail for sheet A -l: Response: Please see added sheet A5.1 with stair details. 2. On sheet A5.0 please provide fastening for detail 5. Rafter still plate attached to the floor. Response: Please see added structural detail 4 and 5 on sheet S3.1 with rafter connection requirements. 3. On sheet A5.0 please provide Twist strap or equivalent for detail 5. Rafter to floor joist or rafter to sub - floor connection. This detail should be designed according to rafter the framing guidelines for Roof framing with raised rafter plate. Response: Please see added structural detail 5 on sheet S3.1 with rafter connection requirements using the twist strap as the means of transferring uplift forces to the structure. 4. On sheet A5.0 detail 5 provide a 1 inch air flow between roof deck and insulation per R806.3. Response: Please see added 1 inch air flow gap in detail 5 on A5.0. 5. On sheet PLO please show a Back flow preventer at the water inlet. Response: Please see added Back flow preventer and some additional requirements on P1.0. 6. On sheet P 1.0 please show an expansion tank for the Hot Water Heater. Response: Please see added expansion tank and some additional requirements on P1.0. 7. On sheet PLO please show on the 1 line drawing clean outs where needed. Response: Please see added cleanout locations on P1.0. 8. On sheet S 1.0 listed under wind speed should be 105 MPH wind speed 3 second wind gust. Response: Please see revised wind speed on S1.0. 9. Please provide window and door schedule and show safety glass where required. Response: Please see door and window schedule indicating where safety glass is required on A2.0. 10. On sheet S2.1 please show rafter connection detail for the east and west elevation Response: Please see detail 6 on 53.1. 11. Are there any collar ties? Response: Yes there should be collar ties at each rafter. The roof rafters are supported by the LVL ridge beam and with collar ties. See revised elevation detail 1 on 52.2 and added details 4 and 5 on 53.1 for structural connections. 12. Sheet S2.2 detail 1 has an issue with design at the upper ceiling level. This design causes some issues with raised rafter connection please detail similar to number 10. Response: Please see revised detail 1 on 52.2. Please feel free to contact me through email if you have any questions. Thank you, Georgi Stanchev Cell: 650.861.9127 s tanchevengk gmail. com Residential Plan Review 4595 Independence Street Feb 15th 2018 Hi Georgi, I am in the process of reviewing your plans for your new addition. Please respond to the following question below. We will continue with this review when we receive your response. Thankyou 1. Please provide a stair detail for sheet A-1 2. On sheet A5.0 please provide fastening for detail S.Rafter sill plate attached to the floor 3. On sheet A5.0 please provide Twist strap or equivalent for detail 5. Rafter to floorjoist or rafter to sub -floor connection. This detail should be designed according to rafter the framing guidelines for Roof framing with a raised rafter plate. 4. On sheet A5.0 detail 5 provide a 1 inch air flow between roof deck and insulation per R806.3 5. On sheet P1.0 please show a Back flow preventer at the water inlet 6. On sheet P1.0 please show and expansion tank for the Hot Water Heater 7. On sheet P1.0 please show on the 1 line drawing clean outs where needed 8. On sheet 51.0 listed under wind speed should be 105 MPH wind speed 3 second wind gust 9. Please provide window and door schedule and show safety glass where required 10. On sheet 52.1 please show rafter connection detail for the east and west elevation 11. Are there any collar ties? 12. Sheet 52.2 detail 1 has an issue with design at the upper ceiling level. This design causes some issues with raised rafter connection please detail similar to number 10. �s i .0 ^ r5 rs i r) 0 I El Em, rot e.R It Ar *ww f FRP 1 L OR I El 1 HONE 303-424-4194 5420 HARLAN ST., P.O. BOX 156 ARVADA, COLORADO 80001 CLEAR CREEK VALLEY WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT Clear Creek Valley Sanitation District (A QUASI MUNCIPALITY) 5420 Harlan St., Arvada, CO 80001 Date: February 5, 2018 Re: Residential Addition at 4595 Independence St., Wheat Ridge, OC 80033, Georgi Stanchev Clear Creek Sanitation District verifies that there is current sewer service available at the property. As long as the addition is attached to the original dwelling an additional/new sewer permit will not be necessary. Please note that any new work on the sewer lines that tie -into CCVSD lines will require inspection. Signed, % Kevin Ramirez District Manager Clear Creek Valley Sanitation District Clear Creek Valley Sanitation Dist 5420 Harlan PO Box 156 Arvada, CO 80001 Phone: 303-424-4194 Fax: 303-424-0632 Email: �c ccvs'a aol.com ..�M . __.....__.... Bill To µ Georgi Stanchev 4595 Indepencence St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 94066 Item Description Unit -001 Sewer Service for 6 mos Service Address I Terms I & invoice # Service Address Due on receipt { 67834 4595 Independence i� Unity Rate Amount µ1.0 90.00 90.00 i �D.� .6sla�tre�r� Total Please put Acct # on bottom left corner of check. Thank vou. NOTE: There will be a $10.00 late fee per unit assessed 60 days after the invoice date. Online payments can be made at: https://www.colorado.gov/payment/clearcreekvalleysanitation The address MUST BE ENTERED in address bar, NOT A SEARCH WINDOW. Fees will apply. Please call us first if you are experiencing sewer drainage problems. 303-424-4194 $90.00 hetetge C HN OF WHEAT Rrrx;r BUILDIN6 AND Ips€TCTIONN St_RV IC S DIVI ON 7500 W 29th _ w What Ridge, Co 80033-8001 I?, 3031,235.2-S.55. 2-j$. is 30113,,7.�929 Proof of SuDMiSSion for Permitting/Plan Review A copy of this form must be completed by each agency indicated on the Permit Submittal Checklist for the project type and be attached to the Building Permit Application at the time of submission. Applications presented for submission without a completed Proof of Submission form from a required agency will not be accepted or processed. Date: 02/04/2018 Project Address: 4595 INDEPENDENCE ST, WHEAT RIDGE CO 80 Name of Firm/Individual submitting documents: GEORGI STANCHEV Project Type/Description: RESIDENTIAL ADDITION -4D83 -Sq -Ft - Signature 83-SFt Signature of Firth Representative or Individual: DO NOT WRITE BELOW POINT FOR AGENCY am a duly authorized representative of the agency indicated below and do, by my signature below, hereby acknowledge receipt of documents necessary for review and approval of the project indicated above. Ao?,ncv reprtsented: (Please check eine) Wheat Ridge Fire Protection * Arvada Fire Protection * Wheat Ridge Mater District t> Consolidated Mutual Water District Valley Water District o Denver Water Agency Dotes: uWheat Ridge Sanitation District Clear Creek Sanitation District v Fruitdale Sanitation District L Westridge Sanitation District o tither Signature, _ bate: nREScheck Software Version 4.6.2 '10, 8/ Compliance Certificate Project STANCHEV RESIDENCE ADDITION Energy Code: 2012 IECC Location: Wheat Ridge, Colorado Construction Type: Single-family Project Type: Addition Climate Zone: 5 (6158 HDD) Permit Date: TBD Permit Number: TBD Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 4595 INDEPENDENCE ST GEORGI STANCHEV OWNER WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 4595 INDEPENDENCE ST WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 (650) 861-9128 stanchevconstruction@gmail.com tiomptiance: Passes -using -UA trade-off Compliance: 2.5% Better Than Code Maximum UA: 236 Your UA: 230 The % Better or Worse Than Code Index reflects how close to compliance the house is based on code trade-off rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum -code home. Envelope Assemblies Roof: Cathedral Ceiling 757 49.0 0.0 0.022 17 West Wall: Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 725 20.0 0.0 0.059 36 Window 1: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame:Double Pane 20 0.270 5 Window 2: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame:Double Pane 20 0.270 5 Door 1: Glass 35 0.290 10 Door 2: Glass 35 0.290 10 East Wall: Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 725 20.0 0.0 0.059 43 South Wall: Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 685 20.0 0.0 0.059 36 Window 3: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame:Double Pane 6 0.270 2 Window 4: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame:Double Pane 12 0.270 3 Door 3: Solid 20 0.270 5 Door 4: Glass 35 0.290 10 Wall 4: Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 685 20.0 0.0 0.059 38 ci�y Window 5: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame:Double Pane 6 Of .270 2 Window 6: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame:Double Pane 12flLaatR' fig@ 270 3 Door 5: Solid 17 d�no 270 5 Project Title: STANCHEV RESIDENCE ADDITION Report date: 10/04/17 Data filename: C:\Users\Rado\Desktop\4595 Indepedece St - House Addition\Submittal Page 1 of 9 Documents\REScheck.rck Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2012 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 4.6.2 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. f Shwciuv- -2 Name - Title Signature ` Date City of Wheat Ridge REScheck Software Version 4.6.2 Inspection Checklist Energy Code: 2012 IECC Requirements: 87.0% were addressed directly in the REScheck software Text in the "Comments/Assumptions" column is provided by the user in the REScheck Requirements screen. For each requirement, the user certifies that a code requirement will be met and how that is documented, or that an exception is being claimed. Where compliance is itemized in a separate table, a reference to that table is provided. Section # Pre-Inspection/Plan Review Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions Req.ID _& 103.1, Construction drawings and ❑Complies Requirement will be met. 103.2 documentation demonstrate ❑Does Not [PR1]1 energy code compliance for the ❑Not Observable building envelope. ❑Not Applicable 103.1, Construction drawings and ❑Complies Requirement will be met. 103.2, documentation demonstrate []Does Not 403.7 energy code compliance for ❑Not Observable [PR3]1 lighting and mechanical systems. ❑Not Applicable Systems serving multiple dwelling units must demonstrate compliance with the IECC Commercial Provisions. 302.1, Heating and cooling equipment is Heating: Heating: ❑Complies Requirement will be met. 403.6 sized per ACCA Manual S based Btu/hr Btu/hr ❑Does Not [PR2]2 on loads calculated per ACCA Cooling: Cooling: ❑Not Observable Manual J or other methods Btu/hr Btu/hr ❑Not Applicable approved by the code official. Additional Comments/Assumptions: City Of VV11eat Rld,qe 1 High Impact (Tier 1) j 2 Medium Impact (Tier 2) 3 Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: STANCHEV RESIDENCE ADDITION Report date: 10/04/17 Data filename: C:\Users\Rado\Desktop\4595 Indepedece St - House Addition\Submittal Page 3 of 9 Documents\REScheck.rck i Section j # Req.ID Foundation inspection Complies? Comments/Assumptions 303.2.1 A protective covering is installed to ❑Complies Exception: null. i[FO11]2 protect exposed exterior insulation ❑Does Not and extends a minimum of 6 in. below ❑Not Observable grade. ❑Not Applicable 403.8 Snow- and ice -melting system controls ❑Complies [FO12]2 installed. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: City of Wheat Ridge Diviso i 1 ;High Impact (Tier 1) i 2 1 Medium Impact (Tier 2) i 3 1 Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: STANCHEV RESIDENCE ADDITION Report date: 10/04/17 Data filename: C:\Users\Rado\Desktop\4595 Indepedece St - House Addition\Submittal Page 4 of 9 Documents\REScheck.rck Section # Framing / Rough -in Inspection Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 402.1.1, Door U -factor. U- U- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies 402.3.4 ❑Does Not table for values. [FR1]1 ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.1.1, Glazing U -factor (area -weighted U- U- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies 402.3.1, average). ❑Does Not table for values. 402.3.3, 402.3.6, ❑Not Observable 402.5 ❑Not Applicable �[FR2]1 1303.1.3 U -factors of fenestration products ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR4]1 are determined in accordance ❑Does Not with the NFRC test procedure or ❑Not Observable taken from the default table. ❑Not Applicable 402.4.1.1 Air barrier and thermal barrier ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR23]1 installed per manufacturer's ❑Does Not instructions. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.4.3 Fenestration that is not site built ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR20]1 is listed and labeled as meeting ❑Does Not AAMA /WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440 ❑Not Observable or has infiltration rates per NFRC ❑Not Applicable 400 that do not exceed code limits. 402.4.4 IC -rated recessed lighting fixtures ❑Complies Exception: null. [FR16]2 sealed at housing/interior finish ❑Does Not and labeled to indicate 152.0 cfm ❑Not Observable leakage at 75 Pa. ❑Not Applicable 403.2.1 Supply ducts in attics are R- R- ❑Complies Exception: null. [FR12]1 insulated to >R-8. All other ducts R- R- ❑Does Not in unconditioned spaces or ❑Not Observable outside the building envelope are ❑Not Applicable insulated to >_R-6. 403.2.2 All joints and seams of air ducts, ❑Complies Exception: null. [FR13]1 air handlers, and filter boxes are ❑Does Not sealed. []Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.2.3 Building cavities are not used as ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR15]3 ducts or plenums. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.3 HVAC piping conveying fluids R- R- ❑Complies [FR17]2 above 105 °F or chilled fluids ❑Does Not below 55 °F are insulated to >_R ❑Not Observable 3 ❑Not Applicable 403.3.1 Protection of insulation on HVAC ❑Complies ' [FR24]1 piping. ❑Does Not (((( ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.4.2 - Hot water pipes are insulated to R- R- ❑Complies [FR18]2 >_R-3. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable City of ❑Not Applicable �r ,eat Ridge Budding DiVlson 11 High Impact (Tier 1) i 2 Medium Impact (Tier 2) 3 Low Impact (Tier 3$,_ Project Title: STANCHEV RESIDENCE ADDITION Report date: 10/04/17 Data filename: C:\Users\Rado\Desktop\4595 Indepedece St - House Addition\Submittal Page 5 of 9 Documents\REScheck.rck Section plans Verified Field Verified # Framing / Rough -In Inspection Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 403.5 Automatic or gravity dampers are []Complies Requirement will be met. [FR19]1 installed on all outdoor air ❑Does Not intakes and exhausts. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: High Impact (Tier 1) i 2 1 Medium Impact (Tier 2) ow of ,Nbeat Rade Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: STANCHEV RESIDENCE ADDITION Report date: 10/04/17 Data filename: C:\Users\Rado\Desktop\4595 Indepedece St - House Addition\Submittal Page 6 of 9 Documents\REScheck.rck Section # Insulation Inspection Plans Verified Valae Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 303.1 All installed insulation is labeled ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [IN13]2 or the installed R -values ❑Does Not - provided. ❑Not Observable []Not Applicable 402.1.1, Wall insulation R -value. If this is a R- R- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies 402.2.5, mass wall with at least 1/2 of the ❑ Wood ❑ Wood ❑Does Not table for values. 402.2.6 wall insulation on the wall F-1 Mass E] Mass ❑Not Observable [11\1311 exterior, the exterior insulation requirement applies (FR10). ❑Steel ❑Steel ❑Not Applicable 303.2 [IN4]1 Wall insulation is installed per manufacturer's instructions. ❑Complies ❑Does Not Requirement will be met. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: City of w1heat Ridge Divison 11 High Impact (Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact (Tier 2) 1 3 Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: STANCHEV RESIDENCE ADDITION Report date: 10/04/17 Data filename: C:\Users\Rado\Desktop\4595 Indepedece St - House Addition\Submittal Page 7 of 9 Documents\REScheck. rck Section # Final Inspection Provisions Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value complies? Comments/Assumptions I& Req.ID 402.1.1, Ceiling insulation R-value. R- R- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies 402.2.1, ❑ Wood ❑ Wood ❑Does Not table for values. 402.2.2, 402.2.6 ❑ Steel ❑ Steel ❑Not Observable [FI1]1 ❑Not Applicable 303.1.1.1, Ceiling insulation installed per ❑Complies Requirement will be met. 303.2 manufacturer's instructions. ❑Does Not [FI2]1 Blown insulation marked every ❑Not Observable 300 ft2. ❑Not Applicable 402.2.3 Vented attics with air permeable ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [F122]2 insulation include baffle adjacent ❑Does Not to soffit and eave vents that ❑Not Observable extends over insulation. ❑Not Applicable 402.2.4 Attic access hatch and door R- R- ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [F13]1 insulation >_R-value of the ❑Does Not adjacent assembly. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable i 402.4.1.2 Blower door test @ 50 Pa. <=5 ACH 50 = ACH 50 = ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FI17]1 ach in Climate Zones 1-2, and ❑Does Not <=3 ach in Climate Zones 3-8. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.2.2 Duct tightness test result of <=4 cfm/100 cfm/100 ❑Complies Exception: null. [FI4]1 cfm/100 ft2 across the system or ft2 ft2 ❑Does Not <=3 cfm/100 ft2 without air [—]Not Observable handler @ 25 Pa. For rough-in ❑Not Applicable tests, verification may need to occur during Framing Inspection. 403.2.2.1 Air handler leakage designated ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [F]24]1 by manufacturer at <=2% of ❑Does Not design air flow. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.1.1 Programmable thermostats ❑Complies Exception: null. [FI9]2 installed on forced air furnaces. ❑Does Not i ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.1.2 Heat pump thermostat installed ❑Complies Exception: null. [FI10]2 on heat pumps. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.4.1 Circulating service hot water ❑Complies Exception: null. [FI11]2 systems have automatic or ❑Does Not accessible manual controls. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.5.1 All mechanical ventilation system ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [F125]2 fans not part of tested and listed ❑Does Not HVAC equipment meet efficacy ❑Not Observable and air flow limits. ❑Not Applicable 404.1 75% of lamps in permanent ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [F16]1 fixtures or 75% of permanent ❑Does Not fixtures have high efficacy lamps. ❑Not Observable Does not apply to low-voltage ❑Not Applicable O`sy o lighting. VqlAeat V�id9e High Impact (Tier 1) 1 2 1 Medium Impact (Tier 2) ( 3 j Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: STANCHEV RESIDENCE ADDITION Report date: 10/04/17 Data filename: C:\Users\Rado\Desktop\4595 Indepedece St - House Addition\Submittal Page 8 of 9 Documents\REScheck. rck Section # Final Inspection Provisions Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 404.1.1 Fuel gas lighting systems have ❑Complies Exception: null. [FI23]3 no continuous pilot light. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 401.3 Compliance certificate posted. []Complies Requirement will be met. [FI7]2 ❑Does Not []Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 303.3 Manufacturer manuals for ❑Complies Requirement will be met. w [FI18]3 mechanical and water heating ❑Does Not systems have been provided. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: High Impact (Tier 1) Crity of Wheat P'.idge Building Divlsu" Medium Impact (Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: STANCHEV RESIDENCE ADDITION Report date: 10/04/17 Data filename: C:\Users\Rado\Desktop\4595 Indepedece St - House Addition\Submittal Page 9 of 9 Documents\REScheck. rck 42012 IECC Energy 1 Efficiency Certificate Above -Grade Wall 20.00 Below -Grade Wall 0.00 Floor 0.00 Ceiling / Roof 49.00 Ductwork (unconditioned spaces): Window 0.27 Door 0.29 Heating System: Cooling System:. Water Heater: Name: Date: Comments olv of VVv:uak Ridg°a Architecture Materials Testing Structural (!R! M G Forensic Geotechnical Civil/Planning ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP Job No. 161035 December 8, 2017 Georgi Stanchev 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Subsurface Soil Investigation - Addition 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado Dear Georgi Stanchev: RMG - Rocky Mountain Group drilled one test boring at the above -referenced address on November 7, 2017. The layout of the site and the approximate location of our exploration are provided in Figure 1, Aerial Site Map. Our findings, conclusions and recommendations are provided in this report. This report presents geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction of residential foundations. The following is excluded from the scope of this report including but not limited to geologic, natural and environmental hazards such as landslides, unstable slopes, seismicity, snow avalanches, water flooding, corrosive soils, erosion, radon, wild fire protection, hazardous waste and natural resources. Site Description and Proposed Construction An approximately 750 square foot single family residential structure with no basement exists on this site. According to the Jefferson County Assessor Property Records search website, the existing structure was built in 1942. Based on conversations with the client, the existing foundation components consist of shallow stem walls. The condition of the existing structure has not been evaluated for this report. It is our understanding that the proposed construction is to consist of a new approximately 985 square foot two-story addition with no basement to the west side of the existing residential structure. Based on conversations with the client, the proposed construction is to be separated from the existing structure by an expansion joint and is to behave independently. It has been assumed that the structure is to consist of light, wood -frame construction. It has been assumed the excavation will not exceed 4 feet deep from the existing ground surfa(and the p osed construction differs from the information provided or the assumptions ma'U°shoul` be contacted to review the differences and how they may impact constructiod9gf he proposed construction. ea Southern Office: Central Office: Northern Office: Monument: 719.488.2145 Colorado Springs, CO 80918 Englewood, CO 80112 Evans, CO 80620 Woodland Park: 719.687.6077 719.548.0600 303.688.9475 970.330.1071 Erbil/Kurdistan Iraq: 0750 192 99 44 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado Subsurface Materials The subsurface materials encountered during the exploration were classified using the Unified Soils Classification System (USCS). Topsoil Topsoil was encountered in the test boring to approximately 6 inches below the existing ground surface (bgs). Topsoil is generally defined as a surficial layer of soil which contains a higher percentage of organic matter of decayed plant roots, stems, and leaves. Topsoil is not considered suitable for construction. Topsoil was visually described as dark brown and moist. Native Soils Underlying the surficial topsoil, native soils were encountered in the test boring to the termination depth. Native soils were generally classified as medium stiff sandy silt and medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel. Native soils were visually described as light brown to brown and moist. C� rrnindwntPr Groundwater was encountered at 9 feet at the time of drilling. However, when checked on December 4, 2017, groundwater was encountered at 8 feet in B -l. Fluctuations in groundwater and subsurface moisture conditions may occur due to variations in rainfall and other factors not readily apparent at this time. Development of the property and adjacent properties may also affect groundwater levels. Additional descriptions and the interpreted distribution (approximate depths) of the subsurface materials are presented in the Test Boring Logs. The soil classifications shown on the logs are based upon the engineer's classification of samples. Lines shown on the logs represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials, and the actual transition may be gradual and vary across the site. An Explanation of the Test Boring Logs, the Test Boring Logs, and a Summary of Laboratory Test Results are presented in Figures 2 through 4. Soil Classification Data are presented in Figure 5. Swell/Consolidation Test Results are presented in Figure 6. Summary of Findings The results of this investigation indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed construction, provided the recommendations presented herein are implemented and appropriate construction practices are followed. Fill was not encountered in the test borings. However, fill materials from the original construction may be encountered. It is recommended that the new foundation extend down through the fill materials to bear on the native soils below documentation can be provided, it will be assumed that this fill was not mo compacted in a manner consistent with the Structural Fill recommendation. report. If such fill is encountered, it is not considered suitable for foundations. In their present condition, the native soils encountered in th RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 2 Job No. 161035 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado suitable for support of shallow foundations. The bearing soils for foundations and slabs will require preparation and compaction as described herein. Foundation Recommendations A spread footing foundation supported on properly prepared and compacted native soils is suitable for the proposed residential structure. A maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf with no minimum dead load requirement may be used for design. The foundation design should be prepared by a qualified Colorado Registered Professional Engineer using the recommendations presented in this report. This foundation system should be designed to span a minimum of 10 feet under the design loads. The bottoms of exterior foundations should be at least 36 inches below finished grade for frost protection. Footings and isolated pads should not be placed on frozen or saturated soil. Prior to placing concrete, all bearing surfaces must be cleared of loose material. Open Excavation Observation During construction, foundation excavations should be observed by RMG prior to placing structural fill, forms, or concrete to verify the foundation bearing conditions for each structure. Based on the conditions observed in the foundation excavation, the recommendations made at the time of construction may vary from those contained herein. In the case of differences, the Open Excavation Observation report shall be considered to be the governing document. The recommendations presented herein are intended only as preliminary guidelines to be used for interpreting the subsurface soil conditions exposed in the excavation and determining the final recommendations for foundation construction. It is recommended that excavation equipment remain on-site until the open excavation observation has been completed. If unsuitable conditions are identified during the open excavation observation, i.e. pockets of loose/soft soils, high groundwater, potentially expansive or collapsible soils, etc., additional earthwork recommendations and/or testing and potentially alternative foundation recommendations may be required at an additional cost. Interior Floor Slabs Slab performance risk evaluation is an engineering judgement which is used as a predictor of the general magnitude of potential slab heave, and the risk of poor slab performance. The Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers (CAGE) recommends structural floors where the slab performance risk is judged to be high or very high. The Slab Performance Risk for slabs bearing atop undisturbed on-site soils is judged to be Low with swell results less than 1% swell with a 1,000 psf surcharge and based on the criteria in the following table. OF Ow 01 i Wheat �id9e RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 3 Job No. 161035 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado Slab Performance Risk Category Representative Percent Swell (500 psf Surcharge) Representative Percent Swell (1.,000 psf Surcharge) Low 0to<3 0to<2 Moderate 3 to < 5 2 to < 4 High 5to<8 4to<6 Very High >8 >6 Note: Based on Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers, Guidelines for Slab Performance Risk Evaluation and Residential Basement Floor System Recommendations (Denver Metropolitan Area, 1996). The owner must understand that the Slab Performance Risk for slabs bearing atop properly prepared and compacted native soils is still anticipated to be Low. Vertical slab movement of one to three inches is considered possible for floor slabs established on properly prepared and compacted native soils. In some cases, vertical movement may exceed these ranges. If movement and associated damage to floors and finishes cannot be tolerated, a structural floor system should be used. Floor slabs should be supported by the same material as the foundation bearing components. Fill materials placed below floor slabs should be consistent, type and compaction, as material below foundation components (or alternate approved by RMG). Floor slabs should be separated from structural components to allow for vertical movement. Control and construction joints should be placed in accordance with the latest guidelines and standards published by the American Concrete Institute (ACI) and applicable local Building Code requirements. Slabs should also be separated from any utility components by isolation joints. Mechanical equipment supported on slabs should be provided with expandable/collapsible sections in order to allow movement of the slab without damage to the equipment or structure. Recommendations for exterior concrete slabs, such as patios, driveways, and sidewalks, are not included in this report. Structural Floors If movement cannot be tolerated, a structural floor system (supported by the foundation independently of the subgrade soils) should be used for the interior floor system of the proposed structures. Environmental health hazards associated with mold growth in crawlspaces must be reduced by utilizing "clean" construction methods. The floor should be properly sealed and vented. A ventilation system activated by temperature and humidity levels may be required in the crawlspace. The entire floor system and ventilation system should be designed by a qualified professional. Recommendations for exterior concrete slabs, such as patios, driveways, ansidelks, not included in this report. RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 4 Job No. 161035 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado Interior Partitions Interior non-bearing partitions and attached furnishings (e.g., cabinets, shower stalls, etc.) on concrete slabs should be constructed with a void so that they do not transmit floor slab movement to the roof or overlying floor. A void of at least 1-1/2 inches is recommended beneath non-bearing partitions. Doors should be provided with at least a 1 inch gap at floor level. Voids and gaps may require reconstruction over the life of the structure to re-establish the void due to vertical slab movement. Interior non-bearing partitions walls and other attached finishes do not require isolation from the structural floor system. Lateral Earth Pressures Foundation walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures. For moisture -conditioned, low -expansive, on-site backfill materials, we recommend an equivalent fluid pressure of 50 pcf for "Active" conditions and 70 pcf for "At -Rest" conditions be used for design. The above lateral earth pressure applies to level, drained backfill conditions. Equivalent Fluid Pressures for sloping/undrained conditions should be determined on an individual basis. Excavations Excavations for the project are expected to encounter primarily sandy silt and other native soils. The native soils will generally be excavatable with heavy-duty earth moving equipment. The excavated on-site soils may be reused as engineered fill provided the recommendations set forth herein are implemented. The contractor should provide safely sloped excavations or an appropriately designed and constructed braced -shoring system, in compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA, 2005) guidelines, for employees working in an excavation that may expose employees to the danger of moving ground. In our opinion, the native soils should generally be considered a Type "C" soil when applying the OSHA guidelines. For these soil conditions, OSHA recommends a temporary slope inclination of 1.5H:1 V or flatter for excavations 20 feet or less in depth. Some surface sloughing may occur on the slope face at these angles. Steeper cut slopes may be utilized for excavations less than 4 feet deep depending on the strength, moisture content, and homogeneity of the soils as observed in the field. Appropriate slope inclinations should be evaluated in the field by an OSHA -qualified "Competent Person" based on the actual conditions encountered. OF CAW of whe3t,Sid9e RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 5 Job No. 161035 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado Site Grading The following sections present recommendations for earthwork during construction including site preparation, structural fill, and exterior backfill. Site Preparation Prior to construction, the ground surface in proposed structure and improvement areas should be stripped of existing vegetation, debris, topsoil, undocumented fill, soft, loose, or disturbed native soils and other deleterious material. This includes areas below foundation and floor slabs. Care should be taken to reduce drying of the subgrade soil below the foundation during construction. Site preparation procedures should be performed such that the potential for standing and ponding of water around the site is reduced. During wet weather earthen berms, swales, or other means should be used to direct water away from excavations. Water that accumulates in excavations should be pumped out or otherwise removed and these areas should be allowed to return to their "natural" moisture condition before resuming construction. Subgrade Preparation of Foundation Elements Foundation elements and slabs should be excavated to native soils or the design bearing elevation for the foundations bearing elements. An Open Excavation Observation should be made at this point to verify soil conditions are as reported in the soil boring logs herein and that foundation elements are not bearing on existing fill or deleterious material. Upon verification the upper 6 -inches of the exposed subsurface soils should then be scarified and moisture conditioned to facilitate compaction (usually within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content) and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor test (ASTM D-698) prior to placing concrete forms. Structural Fill In the event structural fill is needed, the upper 6 inches of the exposed surface soils should be scarified and moisture conditioned to facilitate compaction (usually within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content) and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor test (ASTM D-698) prior to placing structural fill. Structural fill placed on slopes should be benched into the slope. Maximum bench heights should not exceed 4 feet, and bench widths should be wide enough to accommodate compaction equipment. Based on the field explorations and the laboratory testing, the exist] may be acceptable for use as structural fill. This material should topsoil, organics, debris, particles greater than 3 inches in diameter, materials. Once excavated and processed, on-site soils to be used as dikf e materials .rally be free of other deleterious ctural fill `should RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 6 Job No. 161035 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado be separated and stockpiled to be evaluated by the project geotechnical engineer for suitability. Structural fill shall consist of granular, non -expansive material, and it should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 to 12 inchss, moisture conditioned to facilitate compaction (usually within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content) and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor test, ASTM D-698. The materials should be compacted by mechanical means. Earthwork operations should be observed and compaction of structural fill materials should be tested by the project's geotechnical consultant. It is the responsibility of the builder or contractor to schedule with this office to conduct compaction tests, retrieve or accept delivery of a fill sample, or certify the fill material. Early testing is recommended to demonstrate that placement and compaction methods are achieving the required compaction for the entire depth of fill. Without a strict quality assurance program, the fill may not be of sufficient quality to achieved required performance. Exterior Backfill Backfill should generally be free of topsoil, organics, particles greater than 4 inches in diameter, debris, or other deleterious material. Backfill should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 to 12 inches, moisture conditioned to facilitate compaction (usually within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content) and compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor test, ASTM D-698 on exterior sides of walls in landscaped areas. In areas where backfill supports pavement and concrete flatwork, the materials should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor test (ASTM D-698). Fill placed on slopes should be benched into the slope. Maximum bench heights should not exceed 4 feet, and bench widths should be wide enough to accommodate compaction equipment. The appropriate government/utility specifications should be used for fill placed in utility trenches. If material is imported for backfill, the material should be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to hauling it to the site. The backfill should not be placed on frozen subgrade or allowed to freeze during moisture conditioning and placement. Backfill should be compacted by mechanical means, and foundation walls should be braced during backfilling and compaction. Surface Grading and Drainage Drainage is an important key to the successful performance of shallow foundations. The ground surface should be sloped away from structures with a minimum gradient of 1 ( percent for'the first 10 feet. This is equivalent to 12 inches of fall across this 10 -foot zone f 10 :fbot zone is not possible on the upslope side of the structure, then a well-defined swale Ndbe created a RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 7 Job No. 161035 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado minimum 5 feet from the foundation and sloped parallel with the wall with a minimum slope of 2 percent to intercept the surface water and transport it around and away from the structure. Roof drains should extend across backfill zones and landscaped areas to a region that is graded to direct flow away from the structure. It is imperative that homeowners maintain the surface grading and drainage recommended in this report to help prevent water from being directed toward and/or ponding near the foundations. Failure to maintain positive surface drainage away from the structure may result in localized differential vertical movement of foundations and slabs. Landscaping should be selected to reduce irrigation requirements. Plants used close to foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; and irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. To help control weed growth, geotextiles should be used below landscaped areas adjacent to foundations. Impervious plastic membranes are not recommended. Irrigation devices should not be placed within 5 feet of the foundation. Irrigation should be limited to the amount sufficient to maintain vegetation. Application of more water will increase the likelihood of slab and foundation movements. Perimeter Drain A subsurface perimeter drain is recommended around portions of the structure which will have habitable or storage space located below the finished ground surface. This includes crawlspace areas. A typical drain detail is presented in Figure 7. A subsurface perimeter drain is designed to intercept some types of subsurface moisture and not others. Therefore, the drain could operate properly and not mitigate all moisture problems relating to foundation performance or moisture intrusion into the basement area. Concrete Type VII cement is recommended for concrete in contact with the subsurface materials. Calcium chloride should be used with caution for soils with high sulfate contents. The concrete should not be placed on frozen ground. If placed during periods of cold temperatures, the concrete should be kept from freezing. This may require covering the concrete with insulated blankets and heating. Concrete work should be completed in accordance with the latest applicable guidelines and standards published by ACI. Foundation Configuration Remarks The configuration of the foundation system is critical to its performance. The position of foundation windows, jogs, steps and the relative elevation of adjacent and opposite walls can affect foundation performance. The nature of residential foundation construction does not allow for control of these conditions by the Foundation Design Engineer. Improper placement of -the above can result in differential and lateral foundation movement not antipatent ly th` Wheat Ridge Building RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 8 Job No. 161035 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado Geotechnical Engineer. The Foundation Design Engineer should be contacted regarding the foundation configuration. General Remarks The recommendations provided in this report are based upon the subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings, anticipated foundation loads, and accepted engineering practices and principles in the area at the time of report preparation. No warranty is made or implied in this report that this firm has an all inclusive knowledge of every portion of the subsurface materials on or under the site. There is no evaluation detailed enough to reveal every subsurface condition. The nature and extent of variations across the site may not become evident until construction commences or thereafter. The construction process itself may also alter subsurface conditions. If variations appear evident at the time of construction, our office should be notified. If additional mass site grading is performed at the site which results in elevations that vary significantly from existing grades (more than plus or minus 2 ft), our office should be informed about these changes. If needed and/or if desired, we will reexamine our analyses and make supplemental recommendations. The recommendations are intended to reduce differential movement. However, it should be noted that geotechnical engineering recommendations are not an exact science. The recommendations presented in a geotechnical engineering report are not based only on the analytical and empirical tools but rely on engineering judgement as well. The fact that professional judgements must be used in making recommendations means that the conclusions and recommendations presented in a geotechnical engineering report should not be considered risk-free and, more importantly, are not a guarantee that the interaction between the soils and the proposed structure will perform as planned. Furthermore, it must be recognized that the foundation will undergo some movement on all soil types. Concrete floor slabs will likely move vertically. The recommendations for isolating floor slabs from columns, walls, partitions or other structural components should be implemented to mitigate potential damage to the structure. Subsequent owners should be provided a copy of this report. The recommendations are based on accepted local engineering practice and are intended for individuals familiar with local construction practices and standards. The owner is also encouraged to read A Guide to Swelling Soils for Colorado Homebuyers and Homeowners, Special Publication No. 43, available from the Colorado Geological Survey. Recommendations contained in the report are also applicable for prevention of settlement due to wetting of support soils. RMG does not assure the existence of and/or the compliance with the above recommendations. This is the responsibility of the client referenced on the first page. RMG provided recommendations only and does not supervise, direct or control the implementation of the recommendations. City or Wheat Ridge RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 9 Job No. 161035 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado Senate Bill 13 This report may be partial fulfillment of Colorado Senate Bill 13 (1984), C.R.S. 6-6.5-101, The Soil and Hazard Analysis of Residential Construction, if the purchaser receives this report at least fourteen days prior to closing. The purpose of Senate Bill 13 is to inform the purchaser of the presence of expansive soil or hazards on the site. Geologic and environmental hazards are outside the scope of services of this report. Expansive soil and bedrock may result in movement of foundation components and floor slabs. The recommendations presented in this report are intended to reduce, not eliminate, these movements. The homeowner and builder should review and become familiar with Special Publications 43 issued by the Colorado Geologic Survey. This report and the recommendations contained therein are only valid if all parts of Senate Bill 13 are satisfied. Should you have questions, please do not hesitate to call. Reviewed by, RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 4��po L'C y� � O �Q12/8/17 V : S: y 0053145 Forrest K. Wright, P.E. Sr. Geotechnical Project Engineer RMG — Rocky Mountain Group 10 Job No. 161035 NOT TO SCALE N W E S ASSUMED PROPERTY LINIES A�- APPROXIMATE TEST BORING LOCATION PREVIOUS STRUCTURE ALREADY REMOVED city °' J - J 6 V�heat edge ARCHITECTS swumn Orme Cao,dospdng%COgp918 VM%M (719)54&MW ENGINEERS En*wood, CO 80112 (3M) 888-N75 Nom oma: ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP Gmelw CO WO (M) 33 E1 ) �0-1071 z n m IT! - z cl rn z 0 m I AERIAL SITE MAP JOB. No. 161035 4595 INDEPENDENCE ST FIG. No. 1 WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO DATE: 11.29.2017 GEORGISTANCHEV SOILS DESCRIPTION 12 SANDY SILT FM SILTY SAND F11-7-19 _,j TOPSOIL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL LABORATORY TESTS PRESENTED HEREIN WERE PERFORMED BY: RMG - ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP 14 INVERNESS DR. EAST, SUITE E-136 ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO SYMBOLS AND NOTES STANDARD PENETRATION TEST - MADE BY DRIVING A SPLIT -BARREL SAMPLER INTO THE SOIL BY DROPPING A 140 LB. HAMMER 30", IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM XX D-1586. NUMBER INDICATES NUMBER OF HAMMER BLOWS PER FOOT (UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED). UNDISTURBED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE - MADE BY DRIVING A RING -LINED SAMPLER INTO THE SOIL BY DROPPING A 140 LB. HAMMER 30", IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM xx D-3550. NUMBER INDICATES NUMBER OF HAMMER BLOWS PER FOOT (UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED). FREE WATER TABLE la DEPTH AT WHICH BORING CAVED BBULK DISTURBED BULK SAMPLE ItAUG AUGER "CUTTINGS" 4.5 WATER CONTENT (%) ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP ARCHITFCTS A�iteaura ciBJlealnl a StrucNra�Malenals Testing Forensics C'iN, Banning E-NGINEERS cao.aoo r d s— ,te Orae, 2910 Ausln ®uHs P'arl.�vaY Cdaado 6p�, 80918 (7 19) 54&066 00 SIXJiHERN COLORA00. DENVER METRO. NORTHERN COLORPDO EXPLANATION OF TEST BORING LOGS o VM 0t Nir,azI Ridge JOB No. 161035 FIGURE No. 2 DATE 12/5/17 TEST BORING: B-1 I~i 0 z DATE DRILLED: O w w - F- 1 11/7/17 } a a p REMARKS: Q GROUNDWATER @ 8.0' OJ a 12/4/17 00 3 [TOPSOIL]: dark brown, moist a >... Sandy SILT - light brown, medium stiff, moist 9 18.9 5 50/9" 8.6 Silty SAND with Gravel - brown, medium dense to dense, moist 10 11.1 15 23 16.5 20 VD Whe'fx� ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP ARCHITECTS nrcnnen,rw KM Lj c�emm,,1 S—u Ma wNs Te Wg FasnsHs CiA, flaming ENGINEERS Q20-zglo a,sr m.ns RaL� Ctlorab Sp(gs. CO 60916 (719) 50&0600 SOUTHERN COLORADO, DENVER METRO, NORTHERN COLIX2AW TEST BORING LOGS JOB No. 161035 FIGURE No DATE 12/5/17 ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP ARCHITECTS N�hiied SIn Dural RM G F—� ENGINEERS Test Boring No. Depth Water Content Dry Density Liquid Plasticity aFHA Retained Pass n� No. Expansion % Swell/ USCS (%) (pcf) Limit Index No.4 Sieve 200 Sieve Pressure Collapse Classification B-1 4.0 18.9 98.3 36 9 0.0 61.6 0.0 ML B-1 9.0 8.6 129.2 0.0 B-1 14.0 11.1 22 1 38.2 12.8 SM B-1 19.0 16.5 City of Wheat Ridge guitdin9 Divisors ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP �SUMMARY OF W.Ms T.W9 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS JOB No. 161035 FIGURE No. 4 PAGE 1 OF 1 DATE 12/5/17 ARCHITECTS N�hiied SIn Dural RM G F—� ENGINEERS Co�ado so��,os.-,c000-ma or�ei 2910 Fusin 9ufls P� y C ua sprue.CO80910 (719)5480600 SOUTHERN COLORADO. DENVER METRO. NORTHERN COLORADO �SUMMARY OF W.Ms T.W9 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS JOB No. 161035 FIGURE No. 4 PAGE 1 OF 1 DATE 12/5/17 100 90 1--80 C7 W70 °060 C7 z U)50 EL X40 z Lu � 30 W a of 10 0 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER 3 1.5 1 3/4 1/23/8 4 10 20 40 100 200 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY coarse fine coarse medium fine Test Boring Depth (ft) Classification LL PL PI • B-1 4.0 SANDY SILT(ML) 36 27 9 m B-1 14.0 SILTY SAND with GRAVEL(SM) 22 21 1 Test Boring B-1 a B-1 h (ft) %Gravel %Sand 4.0 0,0 38.4 14.0 38,2 49.0 ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP ARCF41TECTS Arcrcnecmrai n i rnRm Stn�cWral RMG Matsials Tes[irg i Faeisks ENGINEERS C'W, annirg gnb son,ms: (c«.on — or ) 2910 Austin Sufis P-k—y Cometlo Spiigs, CO 80918 (719) 5A8O800 SOUTHERN COLORADO. DENVER METRO. NORTHERN COLORADO %Silt I %CI 61.6 12.8 JOB No. 161035 SOIL CLASSIFICATIONI FIGURE No. 5 DATA DATE 12/5/17 3 2 1 z 0 z x 0 w 0 o -1 Cn U) w IY IL -2 0 0 -3 -41 1 1 I I I 1 1 100 1,000 APPLIED PRESSURE - PSF PROJECT: 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, CO SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Sandy SILT NOTE: SAMPLE WAS INUNDATED WITH WATER AT 1,000 PSF 3 2 1 z 0 U) z a 0 X w 0 o -1 U) w -2 0 0 -3 -41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100 1,000 APPLIED PRESSURE - PSF PROJECT: 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, CO SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Silty SAND NOTE: SAMPLE WAS INUNDATED WITH WATER AT 1,000 FSF ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP ARCF-1ITECTS acnaea„�-a ceaemn- RMGSinwlusl Materals Testvg Earensi¢ ENGINEERS cm, pi—iN g262nZ Sonne:: 1CM. o j 2910A. ii Bluffs Parkray Ctlaatlo Spngs, CO 80918 (719)54&Of-00 SOUTHERN COLORADO, DENVER METRO, NORTHERN COLORADO 10,000 SAMPLE LOCATION: B-1 @ 4 FT NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 98.3 PCF NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 18.9% PERCENT SWELL/COMPRESSION: 0.0 10,000 SAMPLE LOCATION: B-1 @ 9 FT NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 129.2 PCF NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT` 8.6% PERCENT SWELL/COMPRESSION: 0.0 JOB No. 161035 SWELL/CONSOLIDATIONI FIGURE No. 6 TEST RESULTS DATE 12/5/17 b z / 0 / Q C) Z J D J 0Q EXTERIOR BACK FILL POLYETHYLENE FILM SEALED TO WALL AND EXTENDED AROUND BOTTOM OF GRAVEL COLLECTOR AS SHOWN 10" MIN 3" — — MIRAFI ® 140N GEOTEXTILE OR EQUIVALENT /i MIN; — WRAP BOTTOM EDGE ALONG 3" POLYETHYLENE FILM AND WRAP TOP EDGE z MIN ALONG FOOTING (AS SHOWN) ' GRAVEL COLLECTOR: GRAVEL SIZE TO BE AT LEAST 2X THE WIDTH OF SLOTTED r z PERFORATIONS OR 1.5X THE DIAMETER OF ROUND FOOTING > / / CDT PERFORATIONS 3" MIN PERFORATED p PIPE (U.N.O.) GENERAL NOTES: 1. BOTTOM OF DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE AT OR BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT ALL LOCATIONS 2. ALL DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE PERFORATED PLASTIC, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE DISCHARGE PORTION WHICH SHALL BE SOLID, NON—PERFORATED PIPE. 3. MINIMUM GRADE FOR DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE 1%, OR 3 INCHES OF FALL IN 25 FEET. 4. DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A FREE GRAVITY OUTFALL, IF POSSIBLE. IF A GRAVITY OUTFALL CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, THEN A SUMP PIT AND PUMP SHALL BE USED. 5. ALL DRAIN COMPONENTS SHALL BE RATED/APPROVED BY THE MANUFACTURER FOR THE INSTALLED DEPTH AND APPLICATION 6. DRAIN SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE OUTFALL OF THE DRAIN, SHALL BE OBSERVED BY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TO VERIFY INSTALLATION. Southem Office ARCH I TECTS Colorado Sprin gs,CO 80918 (719) 548-0600 RMG Central Office: ENGINEERS Englewood, CO 80112 (303)688-9475 Northern Office: ROCKY MOUNTAIN GROUP Greeley/Evans, CO 80620 (970) 330-1071 IV:IMITI: *9: 4;_aO ON City Of Remit To: RAR MIIT FC.GT q RMG - Rocky Mountain Group 2910 Austin Bluffs Parkway, Ste. 100 Colorado Springs, CO 80918 r r'v3C�6t\1Fr-R^ (719) 548-0600 FAX (719) 548-0223 To: Georgi Stanchev 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Address: 4595 Independence St Wheat Ridge, Colorado Reference: Invoice: 161035-1 Invoice Date: 12/11/17 Due Date: C.O.D. Contract Type: Project Code Quantity Project Type and Description Unit Price Total 3illed Under Payment Authorization of RMG Project Contract: 161035 3SI 1.00 Subsurface Soil Investigation -Residential $1,100.00 $1,100.00 Total for RMG Project Contract: 161035 $1,100.00 Total Invoice $1,100.00 City of Wheat Ridge For questions about this invoice please call 303.688.9475 6082 11:59 '.M City of' Wh6at,R �d C COMMUNrry DEvELOPMENT k OR OFFICE USE ONLY 05 -- A pbwpemit # 11 [ L 2 1 too) iNuilding Permit Application p*000040*0* 4595 Independence St, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Addrew, c on t rac t or n/a Phone: Electrical: Plumbing, Mechanical', WR C4 License # W.R. City License # W.R. C4 Ucense # Other City Licensed Sub: Other City Licensed Sub: City Lioense # City License # Complete all information on BOTH sides of this form The project requires re-roofing only. This work includes removal of existing asphalt shingle roof, replacing any degraded board sheathing with new one. Additional work requires the installation aphalt shingle roof. Sq. FULF 1, 1 00sq.ft. OW's I — CUMO"S Amps Squarss 0OW