Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-14-03City • COMMUNm DmLormENT �ge City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235,2846 F: 303,2351857 Dear Mr. LeMendola: Attached please find notice that your request for a request for approval of a I -foot side yard setback variance (6%) from the 15-foot side yard setback resulting in a 14-foot side yard setback to allow for the construction of a residential addition. Enclosed for your reference is a copy of the Approval of Variance. All variance approvals automaticall ex(Eire within I has been obtained within such period of time. The expiration date for this variance approval is *ctober 29, 2014. Please feel free to be in touch with any further questions. Sincerely, im lyrt"M www.ci.wheatridge.co.us 7500 West 29th Avenue City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 "Vlh6at 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 V ge l WHEREAS, • application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 4098 Field referenced as Case No. WA- 14-03 / 4098 Field Dr.; and I WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application; NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that request for approval of a I -foot side yard setback variance (6%) from the 15-foot side yard setback resulting in a 14-foot side yard setback on the east side of the property in a Residential-One (R-1) zone district (Case No. WA-14-03 / 4098 Field Dr.), is granted for property located at 4098 Field Dr., based on the following findings of fact: M I . The design and location of the home addition shall be consistent with the attached exhibits. 2. The setback variance applies only to those portions of the structure adjacent to the south eastern property line. 3. The design and architecture of the proposed structure be similar in character to the existing house. I WHEREAS, an aMplication for a variance was submitted for the property located at 4098 Field referenced as Case No. WA- 1 4-03 / 4098 Field Dr.; and I WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and 'LAW IN MIN VNIM 1 14 IV, I � fultul,#Iipii 11 MI 1 4 opt a I In 1101 iff, I ' Ma 1 M With the following conditions: Date M11 1 * 6 , 4 of w 0ty heatI �idge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Community Development Director DATE: May 2, 2014 CASE MANAGER: Wade Sanner CASE NO. & NAME: WA- 14 -03 / LaMendola ACTION REQUESTED: A request for approval of a 1 -foot side yard setback variance (6 %) from the 15- foot side yard setback resulting in a 14 -foot side yard setback to allow for the construction of a residential addition. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4098 Field Drive APPLICANT(S): OWNER(S): APPROXIMATE AREA: Walter LaMendola Walter LaMendola 18,682 square feet (0.43 acres) PRESENT ZONING: Residential -One (R -1) PRESENT LAND USE: Residential (0.43 acres) ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Location Map Variance Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make a decision. I. REQUEST The property owner of a single - family residence at 4098 Field Drive is requesting a l -foot side yard setback variance to allow the construction of a home addition (Exhibit 1, Submittals). The applicant, Walter La Mendola, has proposed construction of a 375 square foot home addition. The proposed home addition is to allow for the renovation and modernization of the southeast corner of the home. The proposed home addition is for two areas of the home: the front of the home (facing northeast), and southeast corner of the home. The front addition to the home would not require any variance as the addition will be able to be built within the Residential -One (R -1) zoning standards. The proposed addition to the southeast would require a 6 %, 1 -foot variance from the 15 -foot side yard setback requirement for the R -1 zoning district. Due to structural and exterior constraints of the home, to expand the master bedroom in the southeast corner a variance is being requested. Section 26 -115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the standard. I1. CASE ANALYSIS The applicant, Walter LaMendola, is requesting a variance as the property owner of 4098 Field Drive. The property is located near the intersection of Field Drive and Everett Street. The property is zoned Residential -One (R -1). The property is embedded in a single - family neighborhood, with all surrounding properties zoned R-1. The property is part of the Bel Aire Subdivision. According to the Jefferson County Assessor the property at 4098 Field Drive is made of one parcel that is 18,682 square feet in size. The existing 1,791 square foot ranch -style home was built in 1948. The home was purchased by the applicant in 2008. The lot meets the lot standards for the R -1 zone district. The rear lot line is oriented at an angle running from northeast to southwest. The lot is 100 -feet wide from the northern lot line to the southern lot line. From the right -of -way to the southwest corner, the lot is 255 -feet deep (Exhibit 2, Lot Orientation). Access to the property is from a paved horseshoe driveway off Field Drive. Two utility easements exist on the property. A 6 -foot wide easement runs along the side and rear property lines to the east and southwest. A second utility easement cuts through the middle of the rear yard running east to west (Exhibit 3, Utility Easement). This utility easement is 6 -feet wide and is approximately 6 feet from the southeast corner of the home. This easement along with mature vegetation prevents expansion of the home to the southeast. This easement is not recorded on the subdivision plat and was discovered through the City's Arc GIS system. City record gives no indication as to the use of this easement and whether the easement was ever vacated. The single - family home sits close to the 15 -foot side yard setback line (Exhibit 4, Building Expansion). The proposed home addition would expand the home by 375 square feet. The 1 -foot encroachment would mitigate home expansion constraints, since the home rests right on the side yard setback. Variance Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola 10-Dqv Posting During the 1{f -day posting period for variance requests, staff received a letter from the property owner at 4070 Field Drive. The letter was not opposing the specific variance request, but a perceived change in character of the neighborhood due to repeated variance requests u 0 &,a 110 Ill. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to approve an administrative variance, the Community Development Director must determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the variance were denied the property would continue function as a single-family home. The lot meets the R-I standard wand would yield a reasonable return in use. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical conditionof the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. Variance 3 Case No. [VA -1 - 03 / LaMendola There appears to be no hardship due to the topography. The lot is irregularly shaped. The rear yard comes to a point in the southwest comer of the property. With the added mature vegetation, a unique hardship is created not caused by anyone having interest in the property. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. Staff finds this criterion has been met. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and is not expected to injure neighboring property. The building addition will be significantly screened from surrounding properties by mature vegetation. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The structure would not impede the sight distance triangle and would not increase the danger of fire. It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. A number of homes in the neighborhood are built on or within the 15-foot side yard setback. Many of these homes still have room to expand on their lots Wow"" This property is unique do to the mature vegetation to the south, and utility easement near the rear of the home. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. Variance 4 Case No. fVA-14-03 I LaMendola 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single- and two- family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design AfanuaL The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not #ppl.icable, Having found the application in compliance with a majority of the review criteria, staff recommends APPROVAL of a I -foot variance from the 15-foot side yard setback requirement resulting in a 14-foot setback from the eastern property line. Staff has found there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of the variance. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following reasons: With the following conditions: I. The design and location of the home addition shall be consistent with the attached exhibits. 2. The setback variance applies only to those portions of the structure adjacent to the south eastern property line. 3. The design and architecture of the proposed structure be similar in character to the existing house. 4. A building permit shall be obtained prior to construction of the proposed garage. k'ariance Case,Nlo, HA-14-03ILaMendola Exhibit I — Submittals To who it may concern: In terms of the variance criteria for review, it is my belief that 4098 Field Drive would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. The variance would not alter the essential character of the Be] Aire subdivision Variance 6 Case No, JEA-14-03 I LatWendola ry+ fa'£�:. €�".§ �T 10113 C.1 P ¢v,. Lm ' S t S" ,3 fi Y"4WAI. N R A1`<° 4 Y O.FEt l t„ 6 7, ity ° °Y dJ ? 6fi ... , n tz k- C "37Gia ?�47 kt�t # THIS DEED, madc Out SIR day Of OCTOBER 'UN I T 3 r F it�iw „�catw ggg is 90 . betwaan ALPERT E. ANDERSON AND SN.AROW P. ANDPsICLSoN .x'i tat ¢. C5t Nita t 'bFk x"alYCz the tf:onnty of JgPrER8c1N and gy $Rini of calootdo. Stamm tint WALT` E C.AKEN ?OLA. AND NANCY K. YAt31Y x whore itsal addmss is 4098 FIELD 'DRIVE. WREATRIDOE I 80029 . CLD of the County of JKrFYRSON and Stare of t;`.ot ®retie,. 6aants es ff WTTEMFSS, that aha Mtsntcsa. rite "it i r anrroiaastsntt of she rum at ONE i FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 ,saes {,$125.500.00 }ts"s 0 TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND k .. tore rscrspt -d rutY#cStsaey erf whtCh is nrroC:y trknsnwtrdRtd., k Rwaeatad. narSainad. Win and ronvisysd,. axd b3' DOLLARS, tnata Presents does gtent. teargain .seiLcOftITYasidaonMrmuft'Othe, Tea.h ttea < their heirs and aasigmro,*,sr, urntenaricYi nCOmmon hits inJOWfAnarnp. � a` all the seal proptriy. tnRttbrtr with is»Prt+vexncntr, 1f any. steuaaa.. lying and Wit$ in the County of 'S «. jut 4fL80N RMd Stela of Coltuadu, d"WrtbW as fWW"i s'. The Rrantef SUR and will WARRANT AND FOR„L.... DL'MND ft libow-balithnul pmrstisas to the quiet and ptu eesbia pnssraa6cstt of toms grantaet, their heitr and sax >R,ns„ xpainat alt and ercry Pans” or persons tswf411Y 0stitnitil the Wt ula Of *AY The sCregvBtr ue+ shata ineiude the ptxrel, de piutal the *RtRuiar a d rise use of si y Sendat shalt bx s paicxbla to all Residers. IN WfTNESS WHEREOF the prxntor has arei,uied this dead on the data act STATE OF COLORADO yy f t Canty of JEFFERSON gas. i j The f smsalivis inst tr«snt was aaknowlitd$ad below ine shit 8TH day of OCT08ER 1"0 by ALBERT E. ANDERSON AND SHARON E. ANDERSON t tWeaws rnp M.rd xad at'bcio seta. .. asY C'nmratwustw». astxixxa �7es•^ -, r "C'+ , ssr Y fg 1800 LAWRENCE STRTI DENVER, COLORADO $0202 tr us moo ' i t. - c"Ot, tad . or tMn. s"atA. -1 at'". wesaAAaer'Y to anxt Naitu+nY ., ,....__. .__., ...., m.,. �. �.. �,.„,....,. �.. �. a. A._..,. n .,..- ,- _....,..- ......,,�...... aeetavi Cur#kiMtat. aY1t h1..s tr,. LMww, ao aaNB.t 'Ma m as" — $as Variance Case No. TEE- I4- 03 "Lct.A1erlc ola Variance Case No, Y1 -14 -03 ,° L erMendola '�ii! �I RRt)•OS OJ flOq 1V)aM YJ.1(' C'ii YED. R ' i � B _ _ L L. j I30 N30IS311 VIO0N31NVI I I Q - - -- .x I r a I I 1 7 1 1• 1. 1 t ! 1 I 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 I I ' I 1 I I 1 r r Variance 9 Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola I � -- - �� C - ; ! , z ZZ --- - - - - -- 9 .�Z I W d --- I i - ------ - - - - -- - - -- � i a I I ,i - J o' is V I� I � I I � I 1 , t I L 1 I 1 ai b i I I I � o �a I There are 2 parts to the home addition. The front of the home is highlighted in red. The bedroom addition highlighted in blue is the addition that will encroach in to the side yard setback. Variance 10 Case No. WA -14 -03 / LaMendola g � etxxx �.�x�twoman�+arra�e�s a�at �� ,,33 ? �l$8 � x— x p ��� �$ Pg }St d t$fi� } s � }a g � fi , x a " t � pat i� R?7f $ai1 i +t 6r °.+d �` 4Ak �9� g 3 e S &e •� #Fd:4 a� � eSB������5$��341% � ^�'• ......„ .. ._ .._ . ,. ..e _.. _. , &e a o- eaaa.�'�4. A._.. 9— � � � 5E N„ C B 4 Variance Case No. If - I -03 l LaMenelola 5 5 }q i rd Variance 12 s u 9 Variance 12 • -o , , , , , , , , , , , , -- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- -- / --- ----- DOSTIN �1 ' -------------------- - - - - -- ----------------------------- 0 --------------------- - - - - -- ----------------------------- NEW GABLE ROOF VAULT CEN.INO TO BEDROOM , 28 -6 L 6 EXTEND VAULT INTO MnN0 BEDROOMS ROOF PLAN The home addition roofline would continue along the existing roofline to be in character with the existing home. Variance 13 Case No. WA -14 -03 / LaMendola LIu� 111 � YI '��1iI of iN 11 I I ilk il d�l I Ii •I '+ � 6 Cvj Qi 'il 1�30NMIS38 ` IOGN3Wb'l �I> �I! hl +�'+ 1 i6li!I 1 :I ' I" {Iliilliul� Q �� - —• 11 — - - -- -- M 10~A A l i , i r 4 ' i W , � + i i i i , �I z 4i r J r 0 J S Variance 14 Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola Exhibit 2 — Lot Orientation The lot is oriented at angle running southwest to northeast. The lot is 100 -feet wide from the northern lot line (tan) to the southern lot line. From the right -of -way (red line) to the southwest corner the lot is 260 -feet deep. Variance l� Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola Exhibit 3 — Utility Easement o s 1 CWOS °� 1' i� i 0 Utility easements, shown in green, run along the perimeter of the property. One easement runs from east to west through the rear yard. Variance 10 Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola Exhibit 4 — Building Addition a — — Cn / II z 1� A ZZ -£ 7. II ,II .9 .LZ 1 L � 1� Cr ------ - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - ------ -- - -- -- - - - - -- rr= - - - - -- 0 M A 1 �I ------- _---------------- -' I J o - r i a a 1' o s 9 O I( a. e I i0i j 1 i of b I I a ZA 9 1 � J i.0 -.I §� O 2 � The building addition (circled in blue) encroaches into the side yard setback (outlined in red) by one foot. Variance Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola The bedroom addition would extend a foot in to the required side yard setback. Variance is Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola Exhibit 5 — Neighbor Letter April 8, 2014 Carlo & Martha Spano 4070 Field Drive Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Planning Division Attn: Kim Waggoner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Variance setbacks in Bel Aire (most recent at 4098 Field Drive) Dear City of Wheat Ridge, We appreciate the opportunity to have our concerns be given full consideration. We are concerned about yet another request for variance set back in the valued neighborhood of Bel Aire. We are not specifically protesting the setback variance proposal # WA 14 -03. We want to bring to your attention what we see as an alarming trend in this neighborhood. Bel -Aire is one of Wheat Ridge's most highly sought after neighborhoods. Key to this, is it's character and semi -rural feel. The semi -rural feel is, in part, due to the 15 foot setback requirements as well as many homes having larger than normal property size. Wheat Ridge Community Development has approved various set back requests in the past. In some cases despite neighbor disapproval. Per the City's own records there are 10 setback variances in this neighborhood already. This is a large percentage of the homes in Bel -Aire. This trend is alarming. Establishing such a pattern lends itself to a very precarious position which, over time, will erode the elements that make the Bel -Aire neighborhood, specifically Field Drive and Everett Street, a highly desirable and unique neighborhood. While a few variance setbacks, here and there, do not seem to change the character of the neighborhood much, over time, the cumulative effect most definitely will. We encourage ourselves and neighbors to be excellent stewards of their properties and neighborhood. We feel continued variance approvals will, over time, diminish and deteriorate the feel of the unique semi -rural feel of the Bel Aire neighborhood. Surrendering the unique charm of this neighborhood will ultimately affect the property values. Please stop this pattern which is not preserving this neighborhood's essential character. Sincerely, Martha and Carlo Spano Variance � q Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola Considerable separation exists between 4098 and 4055 Field Drive. The two properties are separated by an unpaved horseshoe drive and considerable open space. Distance from the property line at 4098 Field Drive and the home at 4055 Field Drive is 50 feet. Tall mature shrubs will screen the home addition from 4055 Field Drive. Also, a large spruce tree will screen the building addition from Field Drive to the north. Variance Case No. WA -14 -03 / LaMendola �n Exhibit 5 — Screening Exhibit 7 — Building Footprint 0 1 0 0 I _w LL AJ _ y �i 41 W I 014030 04030 04000 0 0 0 04055 i I I I 04015 CW005 I I Many homes (highlighted in red) in the neighborhood are built or encroached into the side or rear setback. Variance 21 Case No. WA -14 -03 /LaMendola City of Wheat R,4 ge CASE NO. WA -14 -03 DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS: Thursday April 10, 2014 1, l,� l +tW- 1 residing at (name) 4098 Field Drive as the applicant for Case No. Public Notice at on this 31 st day of 4098 Field Drive (location) and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for ten (10) days prior to and including the deadline for written comments regarding this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature: 44�5)All� NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Community Development Department for this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file. MAP POSTING CERTIFICATION (address) WA -14 -03 hereby certify that I have posted the sign for March City of W heat I,i�dgc PUBLIC POSTING REQUIREMENTS One sign must be posted per street frontage. In addition, the following requirements must be met: ■ The sign must be located within the property boundaries. • The sign must be securely mounted on a flat surface. • The sign must be elevated a minimum of thirty (30) inches from ground. • The sign must be visible from the street without obstruction. • The sign must be legible and posted for ten (10) continuous days prior to and including the deadline for written comments [sign must be in place until 5pm on Thursday A pril 10, 2014. It is the applicant's responsibility to certify that these requirements have been met and to submit a completed Posting Certification Form to the Community Development Department. City of Wheat - Ridge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 -8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE April 1, 2014 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA- 14 -03, a request for approval of a 1 -foot side yard setback variance (6 %) from the 15 -foot requirement resulting in a 14- foot side yard setback for construction of a residential addition on property zoned Residential One (R -1) located at 4098 Field Dr. The attached site plan identifies the location of the variance request. The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than a fifty percent (50 %) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adiacent property owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303 - 235 -2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on April 10, 2014. Thank you. WA 1403.doc www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Site Plan A request for approval of a I -foot side yard setback variance (6 %) from the 15- foot requirement resulting in a 14 -foot side yard setback for construction of a , , I... CMy rVel— L4Qej5 Serd of Rm to Use Avery 0 Umptate 5,1600 Paf* NAM-am expose Popup Edge AVEWO 51600 ' A CUNNINGHAM MICHAEL L CUNNINGHAM VALERIE S 4040 FIELD DR WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7013 2250 0000 3608 2636 WELSCHINGER PAUL BRANNAN KATHLEEN 4030 FIELD DR WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7013 2250 0000 3608 tlk I OffOuMes faciles A peter } d RePlitz A la is um An de www.avety.com ng Utiiisez to gabarit AVERYO 51600 e ch':6ement r6v6ler fereboro, ftpupTm, 14MGO-AVERY CT w„c yq 4 Imo, � ca i3ti e' ttA bL 3 u b SAwIG 04015 > 04030 w 04 �+ 04005 cA� Jf __ ....... O 1 . e 03860 03840 (Q � 03860 03840 D: 03875 �86. CO 03865 03815 Q: ' 1 Address Phone 006�-1 6� i7 State Fax Address State w Phone Fax Contact a Address Phone e� City State Zip Fax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application. provide additional intimation when necessary, post Public hearing signs. will receive a copy of the staffreport prior to Public licaring, and shall he responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and ownm) Location of request (address): Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Please refer to submittal checklists for complete applicatian requirentents; incomplete applications ivill not be accepted. 0 Change of zone or zone conditions 0 Special Use Permit 0 Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) 0 Consolidation Plat co nditional Use Permit 0 Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) 0 Flood Plain Special Exception Plan approval CI Temporary Use, Building, Sign 0 Lot Line Adjustment 0 Concept Plan approval IK Variance/Waiver (from Section 0 Planned Building Group 0 Right of Way Vacation 0 Other: Detailed description of request: Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: Current Zoning-.—Aj— Current Use: '0- I certg& that the iqlbrination and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best qf tav knoivleace and that infiflikg this applicatio 1 41111 acting with the know/e(,4 wits fisted above, without whose consent the requestedaclion cannot Imifilifir be accomplished ge and consent of those pers Applicants other than osvners must submit pouter-of fi -oin the owner irhich approved of this action on his behalf,' Notarized Signature of Applicant To be filled out bV staff: Efate received, Fee Receipt No. se No A --------- Ca. 0� Corrip Plan Zoning:--t Related Case No, Pre-App tg, M Date Quarter Section Map Case Managcr_SiiZW.---"– Case No. A1403 Date Received 3"1 t31l2014 Related Cases Case Planner anner Case Descri tior . p A request for approval of a 1 -foot sine yard setback variance (6%) from the 15-foot requirement resulting in a 14-foot side ya €d setback for construction of a residential addition on property zoned Residential One (R -1 � dlrr l5tiarr Name Walte€ C.aMendola _....,..,. Dame Phone (303) 808.81 Fa Address `408 Field Dr, _ city Wheat Ridge i State CCt Zip ?80033 , Name iSame ., Name (., Phone ..... address City State Zi - ..,,.:..... . Zip . Name Same Name . Phone Address CA y State r tp ... , �k '4t"f�i"rJ�Y7lJ,YShr7'+�Jt�'/+" � ... ,,... w._..., ., .. .... . � ........ ...... ..... ...... . Address .#°798 Street Fdeid Dr City Wheat Ridge State CO-1 Zip (bdb 3 Location Descript pt Project Name ; Parcel No Qtr action isto t No Parcel No, 39 22# 0500# Qtr Section: ' SE22 District No.: IV i 3922 405004 SE22 l °.' Pre -App Date Neighborhood Meeting Crate App No'. r Review Type Aeviewa Body ' Review Date Disposition Comments Report ( w . p .. t,� ... ..� ....<,, R ud } w evre ,Adorn Y , Case Disposition Disposition Date i Conditions of Approval Notes _. .. .. n . M. Status .Open ., t Res# Ord# _ �- _ Storage Ity 0 h' 6 r w at Jd 1 DEVELOPMENT ooq City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 86033-8001 P: 303-235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 Submittal Checklist - Date: Fee Paid: As app licantfor this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been CITY OF VNEAT RIDGE 03 /31/14 2:89 pM 088 Valter Lawndol RECEIPT 14040810859 FKSD MNT zone ZONING APPLICATION F 200.00 PAYWYT RECEIVED CK 6818 AMOUNT TOTAL M-68 ----- -- ---- — ------- — ---- 206.00 -- wwwAmbestridge.co.us To whom it may concern: In terms of the variance criteria for review, it is my belief that 4098 Field Drive would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. I R. I am proposing a significant substantial investment in 4098 Field Drive, which woulR not be possible without the variance. R. rticular and unique hardship upon me as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, I Be ]-Aire subdivision. in in w k--l" a) z 0 (n 0 w <t 1r) LL (t —4 IL 0 0 .. w -j Z G Z 0 u z LL 0 0 LL 0 W CL M F- W Uj 0 Z F- u u 3 Ci w w 0 (�r X L) U) I - - ------ ---- 066101 ,S-s7 - e 33J MViN2'AF' 3 iVISo 3 ci +cs <r I-RE 41 era z 0 t> .91 11 y o Jo pct z 0 OD Z z 0 j cc I-RE v SFT c r Tlh LAMENDOLA RESIDENCE , :13 i�!o 4 0M FEW ORNF,WHMT R� Co Ma RES jLAMENDOLA 4OW FEW DRNE. MEAT ROGE 00 8W33 I RES jLAMENDOLA 4OW FEW DRNE. MEAT ROGE 00 8W33 V m $(, r /m ;`\I a! ! | \} { jR `� ��kit! LAME NDOLA RES , ■:: \ \ ~ © \: / R ELD DRW . y.y. OMMMIM Carlo & Martha Spano 4070 . III Drive zimm We appreciate the opportunity to have our concerns be given full consideration. We are concerne about yet another request for variance set back in the valued neighborhood of Bel Aire. We are no specifically protesting the setback variance proposal # WA 14-03. We want to bring to your attenti what we see as an alarming trend in this neighborhood. Establishing such a pattern lends itself to a very precarious position which, over time, will erode the elements that make the Bel-Aire neighborhood, specifically Field Drive and Everett Street, a highly desirable and unique neighborhood. While a few variance setbacks, here and there, do not seem to chanRe the character of the nei ## MAM - 1.9 ?-t-LXA We feel continued variance approvals will, over time, diminish and deteriorate the feel of the unique semi-rural feel Or lom" WfPIKO *' , IMM vV Pr ultimately affect the property values. 1111111 1111 jj�� �I� Sincerely, zms# # # r # I ------ 1 -- I 11 it � IN w. x � 1 1 � SR > q I 8 s a �g . ........ . LAMENDOLA RESIDENCE�l t -ldd - < 4OW MELD OPM.W�EAT ROW, Co a= 8 If