Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
5344 Newcombe Street
City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 093633 PERMIT NO: 093633 ISSUED:: 10/26/2009 JOB ADDRESS: 5344 NEWCOMBE ST 'EXPIRES: 04/24/2010 DESCRIPTION;, Reroof ,35 sqs ***'rCONTACTS owner 303/424-9497 Binh Nguyen sub 303/944-5051 Mike Knutson 09-0156 Storm Restoration Co. PARCEL 'INFO ZONE; CODE: UA USE: UA SUBDIVISION: 0044 BLOCK/LOT#: 0/ FEE SUMMARY ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 10,500.00 FEES Permit Fee 253.90 Same Day Inspection 61.00'-. Total Valuation op ) ~~~i; Use `Tax 189.00 ».;e._. , **TOTAL 503.90 Conditions: 6 nail installation & mid-roof inspection required. Board sheathing spaced more than 'a 1/2 of an inch apart requires plywood overlay on entire roof. Ice and water shield required from:eave edge to 21 inside exterior walls. ***Contractor/Property owner shall 'provide !ladder(s) secured in place for inpsections. Subject to field .inspection.' I hereby certify. that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate. applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of`.: Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions. printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat: Ridge. Building Code.(I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat :Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. s4gnature of contractor/owner date 1. This permit was issued in accordance with thee.. provisions set forth in your application and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Codes of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any. other applicable ordinances of the city.. 2. This permit shall expire. 180 days from the issue date. Requests for an extension must be received, prior to expiration date. An extension may be granted at the discretion of the Building Official. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of. one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plane and specifications and any suspension or abandonment` has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes have been or if suspension orabandonment "exceeds one (1) year, full fees shall be. paid for anew permit: 4. Nowork of any manner shall be done that will change the natural flow of water causing a drainage problem. 5. Contractor shall notify the Building inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspection card before proceeding with successive phases: of the job. Theissuance of a permit or the approval of drawings and specifications shall not be construed to be a permit. for, nor an approval of, any violation of the provisions of the'. building codes or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. All'. plan v' is subject to field inspections. Signs tur o ief. BUildi g;Official '.date INSP TION REQUEST LINE: (303)234-5933 BUILDING: OFFICE: (303)23S-2855 REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 3PM ANY BUSINESS:. DAY FOR : INSPECTION THE 'FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. City of Wheat Ridge Building Division m 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855' Fax: 303-237-8929 C~<ORAO~ Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Building Permit Application PropertyAtltlres§` I/IlP- ✓1~ Property Owner (please print): Mailing Address: (if different than property address) Address: ck r - `e- City, State, Zip: Contractor: Y% M04til-01446' Contractor License 4 Sub>Contractors: Electrical City License Company: Date: Plan A Permit Phone: c 3- ~ L(-'M Plumbing City License Company Mechanical City License Company: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Approval: Approval: Approval: Use of space (description): Construction Value: $ / 0 Description of 6rk: (as calculated per the Building Valuation Data sheet) )2 Y 4- o { Plan Review (due at time ofsubmittao: $ ~(,1c 6'LA:~t`Ls- W 5Vh,n~(_Ls Rr~ tic 0`1-( (~w`E vas C.a PK.~t~ Sq. Ft./L.Ft added: Squares BTU's Gallons Amps OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that 1 assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. - CtRLCE ONE:: (O ER) . ('CO ~ OR PERSONAL REPRESEN VITAT of (OWNE ONTRATOR) PRINT NAME: Ut bt.rv_ , SIGNATURE: ~'~~~✓s~'~Date: Bldg Valuation: $ v w~ os ~ N 7 W n A 0 ' W O. N 3 < N Q (D fD 7 m a m ~ m ~ tl ~ ' N (D O o ~ f~ R r n, v` It I ~ I I ry I v' I ~ I `~s~ ~ ~a ,T ~ L z ~ v z _A Z C- 0 C ~ O. a a N ~ ` / Q ~ ^ ~ ~ I 0 ~ 0 C Z - T ~ rt ~ (D ..0 > 0 o ' v il - !e cp G - O N Z W rn J ~ wn O . Z ~n c y ~ ~ o rn ~ < N Z ~ 0 0 ~ m T ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTION LINE - (303-234-5933) CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303-235-2855) Building Permit Number Date 77774 9/27/2004 Property Owner: MELODY HOMES Property Address : 5344 NEWCOMBE ST Contractor License No. : 21948 Company : Greater Western Fence Phone : 466-1831 Phone : 469-8261 OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application, and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the W heat Ridge Building Code (U.B.C.) and all other applicable Wheat Rid e ordinances, for work under this ermit. (OWNER)(CONTRACTOR) SIGNED ' DATE Construction Value : $1,079.00 Permit Fee : $54.37 Plan Review Fee : $0.00 Use Tax : $12.95 Total: $67.32 Use: Description : INSTALL 6' CEDAR TO BOTH WINGS & REAR PROPERTY mm BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Zoning dommants:: SIC : Sq. Ft. : Approval : TRC OK Please Note: Zoning : pRD Owner/contracWr is responsible for lecating preperty Building Ctrmmentiines and conswcting improvements accerding to the approved plan and roquimd development standuds. Approval : The City is not responsible for inaccunte infortnation Public Works Comm9nts:; sub+Naed within the plan sot and any conswdion wroro resuitina from inaccurate iofomWiw Approval: Occupancy : Walls : Roof : Stories : Residential Units : Electrical License No : Company: Expiration Date : Approval: Plumbing License No : Company : Expiration Date : Approval: Mechanical License No : Company: Expiration Date : Approval : (7) This permil was issued in accordance wilh the provisions set forth in yopur application and is sublea to ihe laws of the Stata of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Code of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the City. (2) This permit shall ezpira if (A) the work authorized is nol commenced within sizty (60) days (mm issue date or (B) lhe building aulhorized is suspentled or abandoned for a period of 120 days. (3) If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original ptans and specifcations and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes are made or i( suspension or abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full fees shall be paid for a new permit. (4) No work of any manner shall be done that will change the naWral Flow of water causing a drainage problem. (5) Contrector shall notiy the Building inspector hventy-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive wntten approval on inspection card before proceediing with successive phases of the lob. (6) The issuaFlee o( a ' or fFe 2ppryval of drawings and specifcations shall not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, any violation of the _prtlGl' oft uildingcodes anymDther ordinance,law,mleorregulation. 4 w ~ Chief Building Inspector Please sign Terms and Conditions on reverse side of page. COMMUNRY DEIIELOPNENT OEPARTIAENT '°+`-'~r BUILOMGDISPECTIONLINE-303-?3A-B933 CITY OF WHEAT R~G'E ~ 7500 YYESf 29TH AVENUE YVHEAT RIDGE, CO 80U93 - (903'2352855) APPLICA propern' Ownec t.f\ e \ r,opmny naa,ess: ~3 3L Conaactor Licerkse No.: Company: f _ c- Building Perrtift Number. Date: AvVIk5 1 ` p Phona 3 '-~fo ~ Z H~ C-J ir\ 'K~ JVr--,Lk Phone: wnshucflon Value:S /~1 (c-(, " Permit Fee:$ Plan Review Fee:$ i iw Tay _S Total:S ownmuorrrnweron eiaruiuRE oF mmensrnrmweuM nr,~mrr I herebY certiy urt me seweck tlisIDnoes wapased bY 0w vwaa avPcate" we amaam, ana au.wt.riaem anvloMe wdinenci• nNca rapulatb~coru~a aqof YYheal I~d98 a~~ or ~aeA~a~s d leoo~d: tliet a1 msasuemeMS shaam. ana aYegalWrn maCe are awraes: nnt 1 nnve Aeo ana agrae to adtle M aN mndAiom VA"bd rn tlds nPPBmlm and YW 1 ewna NY re¢vW+smilv for wnvdenKr wan rft mreat FtidBe 6t&hg CoAe N.e.c) aia au oNer applfcede NTeat RWpa Ordkmnaes. for wak undet tlis PermR (OW~ERM~~%SIGNED__1 ~Y 1J-~ 011 (OWNFRIIcoNnVZrGoiP1UmEV Description: - ~ Sq. Ft added ~ l.` CLcL.i.r tc, b.;Yv\ n ,~y P' Expiraiion Dale: Expnaban Date: Eioratirni Date: ~ roval. qaPrpral• MPrcval: ColotaAoenEW~N~Re9WetieMaMBUBdN9~dVYheatW 8tl7a~COlo ~ radoand a i anydhe eppl ~iMeordinren ~cesM the C%y. C4 17ia PermitahaE mpea if W tne walc auMwaaed is nd wmmancea witlin sbdY (60) 0ays Vam issue Aare or (B) tne buiWing aumorvedissusPenMedu abandoned ~ ei -v~eaf ~ ora or .nauewamwa,tiwrmeYr~+w~•e.v~d^ocnairoes (3) tlWsP~kezPY~arowP~t^'aY aW~+ ad~Y~ya~ae6aMa~mienthasnote~oceadedane h3vehcenorwilbemedelnNGaiq4w W~send~ (a) PiowY°~orxdamr~st~ae wagvsm~reame~iar~sawaa~a~n.aea~~ a~awvenml. (6) ContraQOr " nolifY the BuWft kisP°d°r ti"'°^tY40ur (24) Mms h advanae Sor au insPedions; aM dqB reoaive wrinen appmoW m 4+Pedh^ mre eefwe uroceedinm wlh suacesafve Dheses of 4a lob. (6) The issuence d a Pmiit af tAe BPMOvW of drawin9s and speelkabom dqm nd be mtretrued to be e Derind (or. ror m approval ot. mnvwadm athe aovisio+$amB bLuav codw a•ananerwatmm, ew. nAe «regweuw- Chief Building Offiaal L•d bEZB-OS9-E0E 9uzpab djO:Zi 40 80 daS ElecVicai License No: Plumbing License No: Mechanical license No: ComPanY: ComPany: Company: SEP. 3.20B4 4:09PM N0.65@ P."5 P LO T P LA ►v FOR MELODY HOMES lNc. LOT 4, BLOCK SKYUNE ESTATES FILING 3 CITY OF WHEA7 RIDGE. COUNTY OF J F STATE OF COLORADO. ADDRESS 5344 NEWCOMBE 5 EE uS at v ! ~ 1 1.. rv 10 10' F ~ ~Sk'~BACK co V cc ~ ~ Y~~T4-- E.y / j~72o s7. $ - ~i r--m.o-- ~ F~ ' m N r fo.6 i 172 ~ ~ ~1n B. ' ~ i 'lOC . MA vor . us vo 0 : LSS , DASCMENT \ I•~eurt • T N ~ 1 3 GAR rrWe ~ XFT I K ~ ~ Ico I ~ I~ ~ + G co I I~~ I $ I I ~ ~I L vi-O. U.E. NEWCOMBE STREET ~ t na nnr tiw oon xa ~i~noo~ .vus r« npa inc•nan ~ mw f. Pt!~,qq+~wa_~ Marm~i pqyna a M snaqwe u[ m tMc 1r wr wun. 6 Fdl q1611G~S RpNCI1C /OMMp1 qpM6 CC~W ~M4 ~nv Muq P9d m iK M~f01~ W~nM ~wu. II rI a INFO SWF- MODEL 3009 LN 3 CqR ELEV.-C LoT ApEn s.v. ~ 7.220 eo = ( ' a 2 ' y ncc xe.s s BlD4 ryE1p17. ~YQ BLDQ. MOCHT- ~1• AVF F.G.- . q'E. S ~E~Ctt~6RNioTS"EF191Kf~NM6 TI~IIE WATER SEIINCB yµ~t~y g~ SERWCE n.rEa~ sOM. F N~ ' Y gT'~ ~ ~ ~ y~ U~:H1' POIE O LK FOIM. ONT OF WALK 5 x ~p ~ p y~q {pq~~ ~ ~aE ~Off ~ CO~[I+A Fpf pFryQES Lµ ~,j., ix~ r+ww~nr E LINE MELODY HOMES %na a at °M MINIMUM SE78ACK5: ' SCALE: 1"=z0t rfoat 9trrwAwatvo. o 1-500-922-7987 M534-8700" FRpNT: 20.0 SIDE:~~REAR; 10' OATE:05-72-0 a REV: p~,,~~(~) ~e f°r ~g STREET SIDE: 20.0; B n¢• (ao~1 Ke-sass g,. M1NIMUM BETY~EN STRUCIURES:~5' Y B O A -SK- g•d bEZB-OS9-E0E 9utpaa dTO:zT 40 80 daS ~ D n 3 w O n s m n 0 ~ 0 O m N m ~ n 05, ~ 0 c ~ a m O 3 N v ~ c m a og O ~g ~ d~ ~a n~ t~ ¢ ~ m n N f I ~ N ~ a ~ m O T O ~ ~ x m m O r r ::E Z ~ ~ C A 'D 0 cn m r m D O m N n A ~ ~ Z ~ ~ O v m A < m C ~ m ~ 3 m ~ 3 ~ c ? ~ n 3 ay o O O f0 J N N N ~ n.~ O ~p 6 C ~ a .Z7 0 d£`d aay ~ .110 0 2 O N ~O ~ C ~ N C u ~a o gfll ~ N ~ A$ o ~ A M v m" ~ m ~ ~ C n ~m Np a j. O a 3. m O y A O ~ c m n m A d ~ m ;g o n ~ < A C A N N p A ~ l 1 ~ ~ F~I ITI H^ l l y ~ y OI..J 1 O C~ V z ~ Date• 7/~D ~ ~ A Certlflcate of Occupancy or Compietion has been requested for. ,a►o~r8s: 534-4 A1Zc,0eu& lx Sf, - a,RMW or s,RUCMM 5 - Building Department Remarks: Zoning Remarks: Public Works Remarks: Fire Marshall (If Applicabie) Remarics: Sanitation District Approval: (If Applicable) Remarks: Water District Approval: (If Applicable) Remarks: INSPECTIONS WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE BUILDING SITE 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29th AVENUE (303) 234-5933 INSPECTION RECORD L. ; ..7... JOBADDRESS rh t'~' TYPE - OCCUPANCY BUILDING PERMIT N0. 4DATE ISSUED UD h~ t i OWNER N Cy ~ ~ E-tt rr Q~ '1'~ ' CONTRACTOF a I . SETBACKSFROM PROPERTYLINES: NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST INSPECTOR MUST SIGN ALL SPACES PERTAINING TO THIS JOB INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR Foundations I otings v Caissons Rein or nolithic Weat erproofing ~ POUR NO CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED Concrete Slab Floor: Electrical (Ground Work) Plumbing (Ground Work) <y~- (j-- 2 0-0~. ~ H ) -1' 2.^C~t_I i. ~ DO NOT POUR FLOOR UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED Rough Electrical 0 Rough Plumbing ,n Air Test Gas Piping -G~ Rough Heating & Ventilation - Z,d ' Framing 1 - Z.~'I ~~4 Insulation -0 Drywall Nailing Roofing Refrigeration Electrical Underground Final Electrical 14 oy' Plumbing 140~ ulo Heating & Ventilation I4't4 l.U Frame 64P I4~f,4 uii R.O.W. & Drainage Fire Departmeni Parking & Landscaping ! o~ Wj OCCUPANCY NOT PERMITTED UNTIL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED PROTECT THIS CARD FROM THE WEATHER RESIDENTIAL SITE CERTIFICATION DATE; _9-2~- ADDRESS: ra46,l~.,cn..~eE h-r. - LOT: 4 BLOCK: 2 SUBDNISION: SKVUr.+~ Es-rA-t2r. Fw. 0.3 The relative elevations at the refetenced address were measured at the lot sides and corners, top of foundadon and offier locations as needed. The sides, elevatians and drainage pattems es measured aze in substantial conformance with the approved grading and erosion control plan for the referenced subdivision. o The lot grading does not conform to the approved grading and erosion control pian The attached revised ref grading and erosion control plan reflects the existing grading at this site is functionally adequate for this lot aad the overall subdivision. seal 11r) 800/L001n asi aaoIIHw ~ xva os:zi rooozieoiso Sincerely, 09/03/2004 12:27 FAX ~ MELODY ISP Q002/009 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AND Carroll & Lange = DRAINAGE CERTIFICATE Pmletslanel EnVInesrf 61eM Surveyon 165 5ou1h Unlm Blvtl. Su1te 158 . ~ekewooa,CObreea B6228 (303) 060-0200 Pes~ 66.00' N0073"11 "W e LOT 4 CE F O Z < w U' Q Q W Z Z Q Q oQ ~ o~ ~ ~ . f Q 1, . , BLOCK 2 10' U.E ~ M1 I I u.i ( ~ n I 4i ~,i U)~ ~ a. 3 I 20.0' m oi 28.0' I ~I 1.0 2 STORY fRAME&kOCK 5344 ° ~ NEWCOMBE STREET I 1.0' I GF4~~ FF,p~? < 9.5' cnni 1. .M • ' COVD. o pfi M _ ~ -N 10' U.E. ~ 1 66.00;1 50073'11 . . . ~ _ ' . 0, NEWCOMBE STREET 1 Q I q~" N I s'I I ~ < PLAT SCALE: 1" = 20' JOB N0: 3161 DRAwN ev: PH DATE DRAWN:9`3-04 REMSED ISP: REVISED ISP: REGRADE: i zc=Fnin • -FOUND MS REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP p=FOUNO NAIL b[ DISK F-PROPERTY LINE BOW-BACK OF WAIK E-FLOW LINE O mPEOESTAI # IMSERVICE eLIGHT POLE PROPOSED TGB-49.2 AS-BUILT TGB- 49.1 I x-~-~ o 10 I zo ~ 1 NEREBT CfF➢fY MAi THE ELEVAPONS U10 OPMNACf PATI[MN Sl10WN QV Wr4, &a~, a u: UN~ F FSTATES ql ING Np ] THEREM MAE OEKLOFEA F- Ou Su iTKY a' 1HE /80W DESfiuB[D vnonfwtt, pEPFORUFL IXu iNE OwIE SNplw. ANo ACLUPATELY ANO IHUIY OEPILi THE ElEVA11PVS n5 Mfr Ep5tE0 OH THE DAR a sAia SURWC THE REU➢lE s uio utE T aR ~ fmiswEO crtAOa. TNrnEraa[, ii is rwn PESPIXI9BILIi1 LO NNNGW MC CRPDES L n5 YT Bv THE BUaOEq MD AS cEA*iPiEO HEPfIN BT MC WFKYOR. iN Mp➢ON, MF H.O.W. PROiECTdVS ON YOUe PESiDENGE PFONDEO Br YWe BUIWEH N1ll NOi COVEP S1RlICiVfleL OAMACE CAUSED A5 n PESULI af GXANGES NApE W 1ME FIN141E0 ~p ORAIHAGf G'1ME5, MEflEG0.1C, li IS YWp RES>ON516Ntt TO M/.INTNrv iME p1ADL5 A5 SEi BY THE 9WLDER ANO AS - BOW CERnfiEO BY THE SUI1S4'OR rL BY BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAS,L LINE OF LOT 4, BLOCK 2-OF THE RECORDED PIAT SKYLINE ESTATES FlLING N0. 3 BEARINC NO0'13'71°W . WI'M MONUMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON. THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE A80VE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT PLA7 OF A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION THIS 2dQ_ DAY OF SFPT. ,2444 , OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED as: LOT 4, BLOCK 2, FLOOD INFORMATION: SKYLINE ESTATES FILING N0. 3, THis aaoaeRrr ues mrHw zoNe c, oESmnnreo as CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOOUING, ACCORDING TO FEDERAL EMERGENCY MA MENT AGENCY FL000 INSURANCE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, RATE MAP,,:GKSM M1"dS~ANEL N0. 085079-0005 C, STATE OF COLORADO Rew4 . ruNe esrnres rLc. No a.> AND THAT THE LOCATION AND OIMENSIONS'OF ALL BUILDING IMPROVEMEN-T4d,,47$BEIVENY~" ~ -OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNONM TO ME ANO ENCROACFiMENTS:BY OR ON RHE PREM HOWN. • ~ A o. BY: DATE• RECERTIFIEp E: THIS SURVfY DOES NOi AODRE55 EASEMENTS OiHER 1HAN IHOSE SHOYMON THE RECORDEA PLAT NO7ED HEREON. NO 1~IL4,T WAS PfEONDED TO THE SUR4EYOf2. NOTICE: Accwar+c +o caon,ioo uw ra MU5T touMena N+r uwa Acnon aAseo urw wr oercer iM Nis smWr WiHin Nncc Ycu+s vita rau nASr ascoVcAED aa DE/FET. IN NO E1ENf MAY NIY ACTOH BASEO WON IJ1Y DEFECT IN T115 SURYLY BE WMNENCED MORE iHMI 1EN TEAftS FNpI THE DATE Of THE CENTFlCAnW sHaaN NFREON. j ~ 7 I ~ 4 8.3 ' I 46.82 4 .1 50.00' 4 5.16 54 46J6 I 32.00' ~ 5 47.4 PRO P O D ~ I t WVI\~L1L \ ~1 . l - Y rae wauc ~B R I L/,. r' - ~ 4 ~7~~~.,~•~ y,.... y :y ~ . ~ : ~ a 45.50 5 ~ , I j.~ tMENT 54 ~ J9 6 '_5443 L`~' . . ~ SO.C ~ ~ R.0 1 r ~ ~ ! ' ~ '1 1 " y / {.r ~ ~ / - • l A " ~ / . ( aa, f ~ . I F-. 5444. 5442.1 5 MATCH LINE SEE SMEET 3 ~ i ; 600/900In dSI dQ0'I3W Xtld OE:Zi 400Z/£0/60 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTION LINE - (303-234-5933) CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303-235-2855) Property Owner: MELODY HOMES, INC. Property Address: 5344 NEWCOMBE ST Contractor License No. : 21279 Phone : 466-1831 Company : Melody Homes Phone : 466-1831 OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violale applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of W heat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measuremenls shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application, and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (U.B.C.) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge ordinances, for work0 under this permit. (OWNER)(CONTRACTOR) SIGNED -!ywt4 Lw~,~~7.DATE160`J'D Building Permit Number : 77188 Date : 6/7/2004 Construction Value : $219,411.00 Permit Fee : $2,165.55 Plan Review Fee : $100.00 Use Tax : $2,632.93 Total: $4,898.48 Use: Description : 3009 C- FIREPLACE IN FAMILY ROOM, AIR CONDITIONING (5.0 TON) ~ i iq~e. pcoPerh' ~aCBSe~ _ v~c 4;s` ,,o Zoning Comments;' Approval : TRC Zoning : pRD 6uilding Comments:- Approval: CR P`ublic Works•CommenYs: Approval : DFB Occupancy: Walls Electrical License No : 21284 Company:Thunder Ridge Electric Co. Expiration Date : 2/28/2005 Approval : OK/KS BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE ONOLYer I,o°~coctmS`°:''C~ line5 ~~d plan ~e p~n`~J9~F~et at~J ai~y OK The Ct~Y is n~in ~e 41~~CuTate infc sub~ri~gultin8ft0m OK W/ CHANGES TO FOUNDATION REBAR AND DRAINAGE. OK. 5124/04. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS Roof : Stories Plumbing License No :19354 Company :Millwood Plumbing & Heating Expiration Date : 5/25/2005 Approval : OK/KS Residential Units : Mechanical License No : 17790 Company : Four Seasons Heating Expiration Date : 5/30/2005 Approval : OKIKS (1) This permit was issued in accordance with the provisions set forth in yopur application and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations antl Building Code of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any olher applicable ordinanws of the City. (2) This permit shall expire i! (A) the work authorizad is not commenced within sixty (60) days from issue dale or (B) the building authorized is suspended or abandoned for a period of 120 days. (3) If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half ihe amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifcations and any suspension or a0andonment has not exceeded one (1) yeac 1( changes are made or if suspension or abandonment exceetls one (1) year, full fees shall be paitl for a new permit. (4) No work of any manner shall be done ihat will change ihe natural flow of water causing a tlrainage problem. (5) Conirector shall notify the Building Inspector hventy-four (24) hours in advance for all inspectians and shall receive written appmval on inspection card betore proceediing with successive phases of the job. (fi) The issuance of a permit or the appmv I off drawings and specifcations shall not be construed to be a permit for, nor an aOProval af, any violation of the pmvisionsof 1hat%Q_?g coda nyo nce,law,ruleorregulation. ~/'fs...~.::......L. Chief Building Inspe o ~ Please sign Terms and Conditions on reverse side of page. Residential Worksheet (SF/Duplex) l7u• 2'rJ~ Submittal requirements: Copy of Deed Site Plan (to scale) ~ Elevations ~ Address: 5 3 N w cowb Sf. 300,9 • c~ Zoning: PM Use: RV-S Property in the flood plain? 14O Lot Size: 7oZO sq. ft. Lot Width: (Ob ft. Maximum Lot Coverage: 40 Proposed Improvements: House: Addition to House: *Shed: Detached Garage: Proposed Lot Coverage % 2~7(03 Sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. (Total) Vo' 06 % ZDIc3 sq. ft Required Setbacks: FR ZO Provided Setbacks: FR 25 s ~•5 s 1.5 R(o S $.5 S ~ R ~ Maximum Height: 3'~'~ Proposed Height: h2+44 ft. Maximum Size: 31 ~08 sq. ft. ft. Proposed Size zo (,3 sq. ft. Access Notes For one and two-family dwellings, the first 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, bnck pavers or similar materials. For alI uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer than 25' to any property line, except when used as joint access for two or mo[e lots. In residential zone districts, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 feet in width. One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the stteet accesses are at least 30 feet apart, measured from the interior edges. For all uses, one access point pee property is permitted. *Metal sheds in excess of 120 s.f not allowed. Landscapine Notes For one-and two-family dwellings, one hee for every 70 feet of street frontage is required. 100% of the fron[ yard and 25% of the entire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance of C.O. 3 k(o 8 sq. ft. Existing Improvement(s): House: sq. ft. Shed: sq.ft. Detached Garage: sq. fr. Other: sq. ft. Street trees required: Street trees provided: COMMLi1VITYDEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT BuildingPerntitAlumber r BULI.DT3`IG YINSPECTTON LINE - 303d34-5933 bate: ~ CITY OF WAEAT RIDGE 7500 VVEST 29TH AVFNUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303-235-2855) ~AA► ~A ~4~LA~• Propercy Owner: rYU, ~U ~'✓Y~2.P/,:, < - PropcrtyAddress: Conaactor License No.: q Cotrvany. ~ Pbone:30-3-46ro '/,:!3,1 Phone: 3U~-L{(p(~J ($3~ Oll'AEP/COTTIUC70A51CFATUREOfGSDEPSTANDV:CA7<DACREEM[7fT 7hereLycatilyilutlMsctbackEisuncayraposedLythispemlitapplicationueaceurate, COI]SVi1CtlOIlV21llC: arWdorwtvioLteapplipbkadincnces.ruksmieguladvnsolUfeCi,yofWtKaiAidgevr CnveN11{f, Cf5C11%TibM,eSNCbO1150frECMd; Ihsl ill1M85Y2rtKnlf ihWm. snd 9ll!$i11Gn6 peanitFee:$ ,1 G,5-~ ~ maee .R xcumjr, mat 1 nevc rcea ana aYra w wme ay -11 mcairions u.;,tca o„ v.:s appliwlim and thai 1 usume NII rnpm{ibiliry for eomplimee with Iht W11edt RidgC P1sn Review Fee-$ ( o o. o0 , , 6uildingCOde (U.9.C) md all oiha appiwable What Ridge OMiname:, fw work undn 1 lhis perrnit. Total:$ IOWT'EftHCON'fRACT0RkS1GNED OATE IOWTIERMCONTMCfORJ: PRIMEO DAiE DESCRIPTION: v ~1 BUILDIA'G DEPAR7 MENT USE ONLY SIC: Sq.F[.: ZpHIXp COMMlNYl: ~ . Approval zoningl`-p BUIlO11,16 COYNlNTS: OL W ~ ~I{1~ G3 IV /VY4/~0/~' Approval: R-N ~NG~ AblN47E •unJG1NORKiGOMMCMS; Qle- ApprOVel,~_ --r ~ ' Occupancy: Walk: Rooi Stories: Raidential Units: Elatrical T,icrnse No' Vq~ LIPlumbiug License No: Mechanical Licaue No: I11( 0 c°ropa°y~MCLc.t.c°°Wy' ry►,'ZIiJt~d ConV=x Expuation Date: L/ Ficpicarion Date: Expiration Date: Approval: ApprovaL Approva]: li) Thm Peace!, nasiuued"wwmNr.eewiihheDrovivmimtero, i, your+Pdiettine, WUwbjec~WYxMwaMlMSmeMColmdoaiMmtlbrZonvg Rgauriwu and 8u"U Cadn of WAwt ftidye.Cdorado or aey dha sppiobk ardieanca ofd, Ciy. 121 TL"upa+mrh+9<apini!<Nfieoa.twmwmedisew~sd.'iNieyi.ry(60jdrysfromiuredaum(B)ft bw'IdnemiholitxeissurycpGeda .b.ndonN fara perioA ef f2o d.ys 0) If ihif prmii cxpires, a uev.' yama nur Ee xquirad (a a f« aI o"-lul(drc anwum oortmlly roqn'veA DroniEed fw chavges Mve Lua ar r-ill De ma~ :n Oe arigiM pWu aed fpx'+fiuiwna aad mY ~ u~Wndmmea pu ~ enceadd me lt) Ya. t!<Mnga Wrc 6em a ilauu;<.a:w or ♦M.Oonmcx~ a.ceea, oa ) ~ev. Potl ta« a~a eepid fa+ na. pvmi~ (4) No~kolaayauwnahMbsdweiTMwi6ch.nye lbeawNib+d~ ewsuj. bauuKDmbio, (5) Ceev+nar a6.tl odiry O1s Bsadin8luyxs twenp~fau U1) 6aurs:e W.~un (p aB iepiqpiu and ~h.0 +Keivc vnprn ppv.-il on inspariw orE 6elae G~'adin; wiih e~cme.<p►ves a(fiejoY. (b) Thm ISiYlYCiOfiPeetaqOfEK RVmvA NM (KiY0116fNCaO1hl{qltiAbLt)Vmn11YCl.OpNWV~a~~UIY~'iOlatip~MY1L DfiN't41011f O~ e i'Odfi tt NY w~ /y~[ IX It~O640Y. C1»C9iny Iffi tor ZO'd ~ST b00Z 6T idti zsszs~z~o~:Xp~ Md '8 9NINNH-ld DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW FEE STRUCTURE FOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: _~q~_~~-- ~ Applicant: Mdod4Phone# Location ofConstruction: Purpose of Construction: 5~.~~-cF F.r.•~~~~ ~s~a~~ Building Permit Value Single Family X Commercial Multi-Family DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES Development Review Processing Fee: $100.00 a/o o. o~ (for document processing) Single Family Residence Review Fee: $50.00 S So . o0 (for review of applicable technical docaments) Commercial/Mu1ti-Family ReNicw Fee: a •(for review of existing technical documents) 00.00 .(for reNiew of technical documents for canscruction in a Right-of-Way, Final Drainage Report, and Erosion Cortrol Plan) $500.00 CDOT Access Permit Fee: $100.00 $ (for documem application and processing) Tnffic Impad Study Review Fee: $l~ 00 $ (Sor documern review and processing) Flood Plain Vaziance Review Fee: {for document rcvicHand proa:ssing) Class I Application: S30000 S Clazs I Publication/Notice N/A S Class II Application $750.00 Class Il Publication/Notice s`~ 00 ~ TOTAL REVIEW FEES (due at time of building pertnit issuance): $ /So . o0 PLEASE NOTE THAT IN ADDITION TO T[IE ABOVE FEES, 7HERE WII.L BE ADDITIONAL LICENSING AND PERMITTING FEES REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF QvIPROVEMENfS W1THIN PUBLIC RIGHT-0F-WAY. SigoatureofApplicant Date L` D Ac Dd03 DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS BUILD/NG PERMlT APPLICATiON REVIEW Date: Location: 53N/ /VCC+~cdMBE- S-r.~i Aitentioo: Building Departmeat 1 have rcviewed the attached materials submitted in application for approvat of a 5~.~/G[.6 FAH~Ly ~ESiDENGc at the above referenced address. Please note the summary comments below. 1. ✓ Boundary Closwe: _ OK _ Not OK; refer to stipulalions. 2. ✓ Drainage: a. Drainage plan and report needed _ b. Drainage plan not nxded c. Lot drainagdgading lo be reviewed by Building Division ✓ d. Sitt drainagdgading provisions havc ban revicwed and are: [£oz o v~or~ ✓ OK Na OK; refu to stipulations. 3. ✓ NPDES Perntit Required: _ Yes ✓ No 4. ✓ Public Improvements: . a. strat paving needed: Yes ✓ No b. curb and gutter nxded: Yes ✓ No c. sidewalk needed: Yes ✓ No d. svat lights needed: Yes y/ No C. storm xwer nxded: Yes ✓ No f. Ittter of credit requitcd: _ Yes ✓ No If a letta of credit is requued, for what impr ovements? Amoum of letter of aedit: N14 5. ✓ Subdivision Agxment roquired: Yes No 6. Development Covenant requued: _ Yes _ No If Yes, for 7. ✓ Traffic impact analysis and report roquired: _ Yes ~ No 8. /v State Higliway Accas Pertnit needed: _ Yu y/ No 9. _ ✓ New roadway or alley R.O.W. dedication recommended: _ Yes ✓ No If yes, what is recommended7 10 . ✓ All existing dedinted rosdways/alleys meet the sundards of the Ciry: ✓ Yes _ No ]f ra, which do na and what is requested: h//,f 11 . ✓ APPROVAL: The Public Wwks Department hu reviewed this request and her eby giva iu approval, subject a the above and/or attached stipulaaons. Signaturt David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Dme 12. NO APPROVAL: The Public Works Department hu reviewed this request and does nd give its approval for thc reasons atated: Signature 13. ✓ Scipulations attxhed: ✓ Yes 14. ✓ Summary Comments: Mv dam: David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Dare CvRi9-n~.vli cE.~T/F~UFT7G.✓ LETrE.e Fi~oH /~E. _ No P,p.lo,e Td oi'C.O. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 7500 WEST 29T" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 ay m umW araae NpwWverd of Pubk LETTER OF NOTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RESTORATION DATED Sz,fh y ADDRESS Deaz Contractor: In conjunction with the approval of the building permit application for the above referenced address, this letter is to inform you that all existing public improvements located along the frontage of said address shall be restored, (if damaged from related construcUOn) to an acceptable condidon, as determined by City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Department, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to any construction commencing, the City's representative wil] conduct an onsite inspection to detemune the existing condition(s) of the public improvements at this address. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, A2,..O-ta A.0~ David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cc: File Rev 4103 N ~ i Infonnation /r`~~ ToBuild On Englneer/ng • Consuftlng • Test(ng Melody Homes, Inc. Mazch 1, 2004 11031 Sheridan Boulevazd Weshninster, Colorado 80020 Job No. 532-35120 Subject: Summary Report of the Geotechnical Evaluadon for 5344 Newcom6e Street, Lot 4, Block 2, Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3, Wheat Ridge, Colorado References: 1. "Geotechnical Engineering Report of Foundation Recommendations, Lots 1 through 12, Block 1; Lots 1 through 13, Block 2; and Lots I through 12, Block 3, Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3, Wheat Ridge, Colorado," by PSI, Job No. 532- 35120, Addendum 1, dated Mazch 1, 2004 2. "A Guide to Swelling Soils for Colorado Homebuyers and Homeowners," by Noe, David C.; Jochim, Candace L.; and Rogers, William P.; Special Publication 43, Colorado Geological Survey, 1997 Deaz Melody Homes, Inc., Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) has completed a geotechnical evaluation for a portion of the subject subdivision that includes the subject lot. This letter sununarizes the data gathered and our recommendations contained in the referenced report for the subject residence. This summary is intended to provide information for the Homeowner and should not be used for conshuction or foundation engineering purposes. The above referenced Geotechnical Report (See Reference 1) should be utilized for construction or foundation engineering purposes. SITE EXPLORATION Site exploration consisted of drilling one boring neaz the anticipated center of the subject residence. The boring was advanced to a total depth of 20 feet below the existing ground surface. Samples of the subsurface soils were collected in the field and returned to our laboratory for subsequent analysis. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soils encountered in the boring drilled on the subject lot generally consisted of 20 feet of overburden soils consisting of fill, sandy to very sandy clay, and gravelly sand. Bedrock was not encountered below the exisring grade at the time of drilling. Groundwater was not encountered below the grade existing at the boring location when checked at and/or subsequent to the time of drilling. EXPANSIVE SOILSBEDROCK As is common in the Denver Metro Area, some of the soils and bedrock present in this subdivision include expansive clays that will swell upon an increase in moisture content. Experience has shown that some increase in moisture content of the expansive clays beneath the proposed residence and surrounding improvements should be expected due to site development and associated landscape irrigation. Professional Service Industries, Inc. • 4765 Independence Street • Wheat Ritlge, CO 80033 • Phone 3031424-5578 • Fax 303/423-5625 Melody Homes, Inc. Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3 Lot 4, Block 2 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Job No. 532-35120 March 1, 2004 Page 2 of 5 Based upon the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, the use of grade beams and Type B- Narrow Spread Footings or Footing Pads are considered the most appropriate foundation system for the single family residence proposed on this lot. A grade beam and narrow spread footing or footing pad foundation system is utilized to concentrate the loads from the structure on the individual footings or footing pads, thereby opposing the effects of the swelling soil and/or bedrock. In addition, a void box or air space is constructed below the grade beams between the footings or footing pads to help concentrate the loads on the foorings and isolate the bottom of the grade beams from the expansive soils and/or bedrock. FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SLABS Basement Floors. Basement floors in the Front Range azea are commonly constructed as either structurally supported floors with a void space beneath or as a slab-on-grade, depending on the swell potential of the subsurface profile. The determination of whether ar not a slab-on-grade floor system is suitable for a particulaz site requires an assessment of whether slab movement is likely to occur, the potential amount of slab movement, and whether the potential movement will result in unacceptable performance. A slab performance risk evaluation as described in Exhibit A is typically used to provide such an assessment. Structurally supported floors should be used in all non-basement finished living areas in the proposed residence. Structurally supported floors are also recommended in basement azeas where the slab performance risk is categorized as high to very high. Slab-on-grade construction has been used successfully in the Front Range azea for basement floor support on lots where the slab performance risk is categorized as low to moderate. There is risk of slab heave and associated cracking for all slab-on-grade construction in expansive soil areas as discussed in Exhibit A. First time as well as subsequent homeowners must be informed of this potential risk and homeowner responsibilities for maintenance of various items as discussed later. Slab performance risk associated with the soils and/or bedrock materials anticipated to influence the basement floor system on this lot have been judged to be in the low risk category. As a result, a slab-on-arade basement floor system is deemed suitable for use on this lot. Experience has shown that basement slab-on-grade performance has generally been satisfactory on sites where the slab performance risk is judged to be low to moderate. In the Front Range area, basement slabs with up to 3 inches of elevation differential and/or some minor cracking is common and is generally considered "normal" on sites in the low to moderate risk category. While such movement and/ar cracking may not be cosmetically desirable, they aze generally not anticipated to adversely affect performance of the basement slab or foundation provided that all recommendations for slab-on-grade construction and homeowner maintenance described below are closely followed. This discussion assumes the basement is non-habitable. In light of the preceding information, if the homeowner elects to construct improvements in the basement, the improvements must at ]east be constructed in accordance with the "Slab-on-Grade Construction Details" presented below. Non-Basement Slabs. Garage floors, driveways, sidewalks, exterior porches and patios are normally constructed as slabs-on-grade and are usually incorporated into the construction of a typical residence. In areas where expansive soils are present, non-basement slabs are likely to undergo some heaving and cracking. Performance of these non-basement slab-on-grade elements in areas of expansive soils is variable and unpredictable. At the present time solutions using readily Melody Homes, Inc. Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3 Lot 4, Block 2 Job No. 532-35120 March 1, 2004 Page 3 of 5 available construction technology considered to be within practical, cost effective limits are not available to preclude movement of these slab-on-grade elements. Slab-on-Grade ConstrucHon Details. Cracking of slabs-on-gade is normal and should be expected. Cracking can occur not only as a result of heaving or compression of the supporting soil and/or bedrock material, but also as a result of concrete curing siresses. The homeowner should closely follow the precautions listed below for all slab-on-grade construction. These details will not reduce the amount of slab movement, but are intended to reduce potential damage should heaving of the supporting subgrade take place. It should be noted that significant swelling of expansive soils can occur, even with a small increase in moisture content, and some increase in moisture content is inevitable as a result of development and associated landscaping. However, extreme moisture content increases can be largely controlled by proper and responsible homeowner maintenance and 'urigation practices. 1. Slabs should be separated from all exterior walls, column posts, interior bearing members and utility lines to allow independent vertical movement of the slab (i.e., construct a"floating" slab). Plumbing and utilities that pass through the slab should be isolated from the slabs. It is recommended that flexible boots be used on a11 non-pressurized utility lines above the floor slab. 2. Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems supported by slabs should be provided with minimum 3-inch flexible connections between the plenum and the air ducts or piping. 3. A muumum 3-inch void space is recommended above, or below partitions that are placed on the slab. In finished areas, a11 funing strips, drywall and paneling should stop at least 3 inches from the top of the slab. The void space can be covered with a molding strip. Doorways and stairwells should also be designed for this movement. Recommended construction details for partitions, doorways and stairwells are presented in Exhibit B. NOTE: Movement of slabs supported on ezpansive soils/bedrock could exceed the partition void space recommended above. These void spaces are not intended to anticipate total potential slab movement. They are intended to prevent irrzmediate damage to the superstructure and serve as an indicator of slab movement. They must be monitored and maintained by the homeoNmer for the life of the structure. 4. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be constructed in a manner such that movement of these slabs does not adversely affect or get transmitted to the residence foundation or superstructure. The Owner should seek the assistance of a professional geotechnica7 engineer when considering patio and /or porch improvements. Isolation of garage door tracks and door jambs from the garage slab should be maintained by the homeowner throughout the life of the shuchue. DRAIN SYSTEM An individual perimeter foundation drain system has been recommended around all basements and below grade habitable floor space. The drain should discharge to a positive gravity outfall away from the residence or to a sump pit which would allow pump discharge. If a gravity discharge is utilized as the primary discharge mechanism, it is recommended that a sump pit also be constructed Melody Homes, Inc. Job No. 532-35120 Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3 March 1, 2004 Lot 4, Block 2 Page 4 of 5 as a backup system. If a sump pit is installed and water continuously accumulates in the sump, a pump should be installed by the homeowner to remove the water. The pump should dischazge into exisring drainage swales outside the limits of the backfill, or another suitable gravity outfall. The homeowner should periodically check the sump pit to verify that the pump is operating properly, and accumulated water is being removed. The purpose of the perimeter foundation drain system is to help remove water that may accumulate azound the foundation, and ultimately keep water out of below grade azeas. The foundation drain is not intended to prevent an increase in the moisture content of the soils or prevent moist conditions in crawl space areas or beneath slabs. CRAWL SPACE AREAS A ground cover moisture barrier and adequate ventilation is recommended in all crawl space areas to help control humidity in the crawl space and living azeas above. The use of black heavy gauge polyethylene sheeting as a ground cover and attached to the foundation walls is recommended as the moistwe barrier. A minimum overlap of three feet is recommended for unbonded polyethylene sheets. The craw] space gound cover should be kept free of organic material and debris during and a$er construction. LANDSCAPING, SURFACE DRAINAGE, AND IRRIGATION Proper maintenance of the areas surrounding the foundation can affect performance of the structure. Our experience has shown that if the Homeowner properly maintains the items summarized below, wetting of the foundation soils can be reduced and thereby decrease the risk of future problems with the structure. 1. The backfill should have a positive slope away from the foundation walls on all sides. The grade can be reduced somewhat if pavements or slabs will cover backfill azeas. The minimum decline away from the house should not be less than 6 inches in the first 5 feet (i.e. 10 percent) with a minimum slope of 2 percent thereafter. If settlement of the backfill results in low areas, these areas should be filled and compacted with a fine-grained soi] to establish the positive slopes mentioned above. The addition of rock, bazk, or mulch in low areas to establish positive slopes is not acceptable. 2. Downspouts should dischazge into spiash blocks that extend beyond the limits of the foundation wall backfill and a minimum of 5 feet from the foundation. Splash blocks should be sloped away from the foundation walls. The use of long downspout extensions instead of splash blocks is recommended. Downspout extensions should not be buried in such a manner that the outlet is obstnxcted in any way. If downspout extensions aze buried, they must be constructed of non-perforated pipe. We recommend that splash blocks, or any impervious material, be placed beneath sill cocks and extend at least 3 feet horizontally from the foundation wall. 3. Particulaz care should be taken during fmal landscaping of the site. If the Homeowner desires to plant next to or neaz foundation walls, or exterior slabs, it should be understood that the risk of future damage to the structure or slabs-on-grade is increased. It is advisable to plant only vegetation that requires very little irrigation or only natural precipitation For survival next to or neaz the foundation or exterior slabs. Melody Homes, Inc. Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3 Lot 4, Block 2 Job No.532-35120 March 1, 2004 Page 5 of 5 4. Installation of decorarive landscaped azeas such as gravel, bazk, wood mulch, etc. is advocated as an altemative to planting next to foundations and exterior slabs. These azeas should be underlain with polyethylene or geotextile fabric. To reduce water infiliration, the slopes recommended above must be maintained. The edge of decorative azeas should be constructed above the adjacent lawn or ground surface, and should not impede draniage with grass stops. Refer to EJChibit C for a recommended typical decorative installation. 5. Sprinkler system water lines should not be installed next to foundation walls. If a sprinkler system is installed, the sprinkler heads should be placed so that the spray from the heads does not fali within five feet of the foundarion walls. Where practicable, main sprinkler lines, zone control boxes, and drains should be constructed at least 10 feet from the foundarion walls. Lawn irrigation should be limited to only the amount necessary to maintain normal growth. Excessive watering must be avoided. 6. Swales and drainage routes established during site development and final grading on the subject lot must not be altered and must be maintained by the homeowner. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION The recommendations that are summarized herein were made prior to start of construction of the subject residence. It is possible that subsurface conditions may be encountered at the time of construction that aze different from those anticipated at the time of this writing. If significantly different subsurface conditions are encountered at the time of construction, the type of foundation and/or basement floor system to be constructed may change. If foundation or floor system recommendations change, the Builder should notify you of the change. SUMMARY This letter is only a summary of our findings and recommendations for the subject lot, and is intended for the potential customer who is considering purchase of the home from the Builder. Should the home be sold in the future, the seller should pass this letter on to any subsequent purchasers. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. v5649 z-e • Ryan Lepro G. Huqr`~ Staff Engineer S~y}Af~ Attachments: Exhibit A- Slab Performance Risk Evaluation Exhibit B- Recommended Construction Details for Partitions, Doorways, and Stairwells Exhibit C- Recommended L,andscaping Details EXHIBIT A SLAB PERFORMANCE RISK EVALUATION The soils and bedrock in Colorado include expansive clays and claystone bedrock that will swell upon an increase in moisture content. These expansive materials occur at or neaz the ground surface throughout most of the Denver metropolitan azea. There aze risks associated with construction on, and living in azeas of expansive soils that cannot be completely eliminated by either engineering or construction techniquea While the risk of damage cannot be eliminated, the home building indushy has developed effective methods to mifigate damage. The determinafion as to whether slab-on-grade construcrion can or should be used for a particular application requires an evaluation of the likelihood or risk that slab-on-grade movement will occur, and if movement does occur, whether the potential movement will result in unacceptable slab performance. What constitutes unacceptable slab performance is subjective, and includes consideration of the amount of total slab movement, differential slab movement, and cracking that occurs as a result of differential slab movement. The performance of a slab-on-grade depends upon the interaction of many factors, many of which cannot be accurately known or predicted. These factors include details of the slab construction as weli as the behavior of the soil and /or bedrock material that widerlie the slab. Behauior of the soil and/or bedrock materials below a slab is a function of numerous factors including geologic structure, the local and regional soil and bedrock profile and iYs variability, material types below the slab, engineering properties of materials below the slab, existing stress state, density and moisture content of materials below the slab, swell and/or suction potential of the soil and bedrock material below the slab and nearby, depth and magnitude of future moisture increase, existing and future ground water conditions, presence and location of neazby surface water sources, type and configuration of basement, tolerable movement for intended use, performance history and experience in the area, surface topography, previous and future grading, surface and subsurface drainage, site landscaping, irrigation and vegetation. Assessment of future slab-on-grade performance involves consideration of all the above factors. Due to the complex interaction of all these factors, such an assessment is necessarily subjective, and requires considerable experience and judgment on the part of the geotechnical engineer. Such an assessment is referred to as a"slab performance risk evaluation" (SPRE). Slab performance risk evaluation is an engineering judgment that is used as a predictor of the general magnitude of potential slab-on-grade heave, and the risk of poor slab-on-grade performance. Although the results of laboratory swell tesfing to determine the measured swell percentage or swell potential of individual samples of a soil or bedrock material is an important consideration in this process and one that has been used extensively for more than 30 years in the Denver metro azea, the results of swell testing performed on a given lot or subdivision alone are only an indicator of how an expansive soil may behave, and used alone are not sufficient to effectively assess future slab-on- grade performance. Unfortmnately a lazge percentage of people tend to focus solely on the results of laboratory testing when evaluating the risk of expansive soils in their home buying decisions. Arofessional Seivice Industiies. Inc. Page 1 of 3 March l. 2004 In an effort to provide some unifomuty in terminology and provide a relative correlation of slab performance risk to the results of swell tests (i.e. measured swell), the Colorado Associarion of Geotechnical Engineers (CAGE) developed the concept of slab performance risk categories as part of a 1996 document titled "Guideline for Slab Performance Risk Evaluation and Residential Basement Floar System Recommendations". The risk categories developed by CAGE are reproduced below: TABLE II RECOMMENDED REPRESENTATIVE SWELL POTENTIAL DESCRIPTIONS AND CORRESPONDING SLAB PERFORMANCE RISK CATEGORIES Slab Performance Risk Cate o Representative* Percent Swell (500 sf Surchar e Representative* Percent Swell (1000 sf 5urchaz e I,ow 0 to < 3 0 to < 2 Moderate 3 to < 5 2 to < 4 Hi 5 to<8 4to<6 V Hi >8 >6 *NOTE: The representative percent swell values presented in the above table are not necessarily measured values; rather, they are a judgment of the overall swell of the soil and bedrock profile likely to influence slab performance. Representative swell can be thought of as the range of swell percentage which, in the opinion of the engineer, best represents the swelling characteristics of the soils and bedrock within the anticipated zone of moisture content increase (often referred to as the depth of wetting) below foundation excavation depths when considering all of the above factors. A current design assumption £or the zone of material subject to an increase in moisture content below basement slabs-on-grade is approximately 7 to 10 feet. In unusual circumstances, wetting can exceed these depths. The engineer should evaluate potential wetting depths based upon geologic conditions and the site specific soil profile. Movement of foundations and concrete flat work constructed in areas with expansive soils wiil occur over time regardless of the performance risk category judged to be representative of a given site or azea. However, the anticipated severity and frequency of damage has generally been observed to increase with increasing slab performance risk category. Few detailed studies correlating perceived slab performance risk with actual performance data have been performed to date in the Denver metro area for numerous reasons, including insufficient and inaccessible repair and maintenance records as well as inability to survey the condirion of exisfing occupied homes. However, the results of studies that have been performed recently in the Denver metro area have validated this observarion: Criteria used in the study to evaluate slab performance inciuded a maximum crack height of'/< inch, a maacimum crack width of'/< inch, and a maximum differential elevation across the siab of 3 inches. The percent of homes surveyed that exceeded any one of the fl-iree criteria is shown below: Professional Service Industries. Inc Page 2 of 3 March 1, 2004 Basement Floor Slab Performance ~ S 60 'a eo m 50 x ~ 40 W y V ~ 30 20 ° x a 10 o N 0 ~ = Low Moderate High Very High Slab Performance Risk Category Structurally supported floors, also known as structural floors, aze generally considered the most effective way to reduce the likelihood of basement floor movement due to soil heave. There are other design issues associated with structural floors, such as ventilarion and increased lateral loads, air quality, energy efficiency, maintenance, etc. which must be considered. Structural floors do not constitute a perfect option and in many cases are not the best option. Based upon the combined experience of iYs members, CAGE advocates the use of structurally supported basement floors on sites where the slab performance risk is categorized as high or very high. Some homebuilders subscribe to this methodology and their standard practice is to use slab-on-grade basement floors on sites where the slab-on-grade performance category is judged by their geotechnical consultant to be low or moderate. In the case where the homebuilder does not provide the buyer with an option to select the type of basement floor to be constructed, and/or the buyer does not feel comfortable with, or understand the floor recommendations and associated risk as explained herein, PSI recommends that the homebuyer retain the services of a qualified geotecluucal engineer experienced with residential construction in the Denver metro azea to assist in reviewing the available geotechnical information and associated recommendations. PSI also recommends use of structurally supported basement floors for lots where the slab performance risk is judged to be high or very high. On low and moderate swell potential sites, differenrial slab heave of up to 3 inches is considered normal. In unusual instances, the normal movement can be exceeded. In construction of residential structures, the risks associated with swelling soils and bedrock can be mitigated, but not eliminated, by careful design and construction procedures. The home building industry has developed design and conshvction methods which have reduced frequency of slab-on- grade and foundation distress over the past 10 years. Homeowners must accept that slab-on-grade construction and, in some instances, foundations may be affected by swelling soils. At the present time, heaving of concrete flat work such as driveways, patios, garage floors, etc. cannot be precluded using readily available construction technology within practical, cost effective limiCS. Professional Seivice lndustties, Inc. Pa=e 3 of 3 March l, 2004 v Partition Spike as required I 1 for stability ~ ~ Molding, nail at bottom onl~ ~ Void Spece Drilled hole Concrete slab LI r Wood 2 x 4, nail to slab =FS-F7; o~mation VOID SPACE DETAIL FOR BuildOn PARTITIONS ON SLABS ing • Testlng EXHIBIT B Brick or siding 5' Minimum Frame Wall Rock or bark area eith downspoui extended beyond edging Sod i Foundation I 1=' ' Wall Perforated edging or equivalent to allos release ot water from roek or bark area Maintein minimum slope of 10% awey from foundation Minimum 6 Mil Polyethylene or Geotextile Fabric sloped away from foundation under edging to top of grass Inforn2ation RECOMMENDED LANDSCAPING L/'"~'~ ToBuildOn PROCEDURES Engineeitng • con5uffln9. rasOng EXHIBIT c PLOT PLAN FOR W) MELODY HOMESINI. LOT 4 , BLOCK 2, SKYLINE ESTATES, FILING 3 , CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON , STATE OF COLORADO. ADDRESS 5344 NEWCOMBE STREET u'.~ av uu yy w„ I, 4,~ I,evviv uu i0 46•50 N00° 1 3 1 1 W 66. C 10' E. E~ ~ ~ L..J ~ ~ N~ H ~ Q V 1 ~ N ~SETBACK ~ ~ I LOT4 ~ ~ j 7~ ,920 sf. co ~ A~ ' 8. jM Toc = <e.5 ` TOF = 49.2 I 3009 BASEMENT N r~ L; II Ln I~ ~ ~ N L ` s F. I ~I M , lo ' I , ~ a Ic ~ I(-~ 4II` ~ I 5' N 3 CAR FlREPIACE O Fi! GARA6E iN ~•0 I I~ ~ I LEFT ~N N I Ln 8 fi47.8 I ~ I I ~ DRIVEWAY 1 M. CJNT. , I IO - PORCH ~o 0 0 N 10' U.E. 10 45.30 00- 1 3" 1"W 6.00" 44.64 NEWCOMBE STREET r.cucam umrc 1. TMIS PLOT PIAN DOES NOT SHOW LOCA➢ON OF PoNDOW WELLS. FOR iHEIR LOCATION SEE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERED PLANS. 2. OIMENSIONS SMOVM PROUND THE PERIMETER OF RIE SttiUCTURE ARE i0 THE E%TERIOR FOl1NDATION CORNERS. 3. PR0A0E AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL FOUNOATION WALLS PER WARRANTY REOUIREMENTS. (0.58 MINIMUM SLOPE FOR CONCRETE PANSJ 4. THIS PLOT PLAN SHOWS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ONIY. FINAL CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY. 5. FOR QUESTIONS REGARDINC iHE FOUNDATION DURING E%CAVATION, FORM SEiTINC, AND HOUSE CONSTRUCTION REFER TO THE ENCMEERED FOUNDAiION PLANS. f-'' "A INFO STAKE: MODEL 3009 LH 3 CAR ELEV. - C LOT AREA (S.F.) = 7,920 HOUSE AREA (S.F.) = 2334.7 COVERAGE= 29.57 BLDG. HEIGHT= 29.2' AVG. BLDG. HEIGHT= 24.2' AVG. F.G.= 43. S NG ° HOUSE AT MINIMUM SETBACK LtlitNU: UUUTILITY PEDESTALS p z CHECK FORMS BEFORE POURING HO R OTICE REQUIRED WATER SERVICE ft=PROPERTY LINE x ~n W 48 U N QS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 80W=6ACK OF WAIK 2' STAGGER REQUIRED ~ LIGHT POLE FOW=FRONT OF WALK 00 fL=FLOW LINE zU OT CO ERAGE FOR / ~I-WL 0 ~~FIRE HYDRANT SE 4 7 L V RANCHES EA MENT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 1°=20' CMELODY HOMES INC. CAu UTILITM NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 0' FRONT: 20 SCALE: 1 f031 SHERIDAN BLVD. 1-800- 922-1987 E . ~ 0~ 5'REAR: SIDE: 7 DATE: 05-12-04 c ER OpS34-V7OOIDFHV • _ REV: WESTMINSTER C0. 80020 STREET SIDE: 20.0 BY: BMA PHONE: (303) ass-ias> K,;MM M N,~,o MIN IMUM ' JOB N0: SKY3 Fax: (sos) 466-2368 BETWEEN STRUCTURES:15 PLOT PLAN FOR W) MELODY HOMESINC. LOT 4 , BLOCK SKYLINE ESTATES, FILING 3 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON , STATE OF COLORADO. ADDRESS 5344 NEWCOMBE STREET u~ av vu ~j y iv\„ ~ ,,UUiv so 46.50 NO0° 13 1 1 W 66. , o' K ~ ~ N ~SETBACK ~ C-) Q~ I - ~ ~LOT4 ~ j 7i , 920 sf. W ~ ~ H H ~ ~ C V1 s .J J 10.8' ~ 1 I 1iq TOG = 48.5 TOF = 49.2 3009 L_ , BASEMENT uti E. I NI mll MI~ Icf) oo I, 48.~i a. ~ I ^ I~ M I II 5' ifl N ' FlREPIAGE O FR N ~ w II 3 CAR ~ I I w I I GARAGE 1.o' I "v~ II I LEFT jc~ ~ .I I i IN I ' ~ S. ~ N L I t-a7.e I I ~ ' I 9.5~ i I -?O_''_ _ 5m. CnM. I I0 I I PORCH i+~ I - - - - O I o I L DRIVPMAY Q 0~ ~ M L N ~ ~ ~ I ~ N I - - - - - J L t 10' U.E. 10' 45.30 00° 1 3" 1"W UU 44.64 NEWCOMBE STREET f.FNFRAI NOTES 1. THIS PLOT PIAN OOES NOT SHOW LOCATION OF N1NDOW WELLS. FOR THEIR LOCATION SEE STRUCNRAL ENGINEERED PLANS. 2. DIMENSIONS SHONN AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE STRUCTURE ARE TO iHE EXiERIOR FOUNDA710N CORNERS. 3. PROVIDE FND MAMTAIN POSIiIVE DRFIRAGE AWRY FROM ALL FOUNDAiION WALLS PER WARRANTY RE4UIREMENTS. (O.Sx MINIMUM SLOPE FOR CONCRETE PANSJ 4. iH15 PLOT PLAN SHOWS PROPOSEO IMPROVEMENTS ONIY. FINAL CONSTRIICTION MAY VARY. 5. FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING iNE FOUNDATION OURING E%CAVATION, FORM SETTING, ANO HOUSE WNSTRUCTION REFER TO THE ENCINEERED FOUNDA710N PUNS. INFO STAKE: MODEL 3009 LH 3 CAR ELEV. ~ G LOT AREA (S.F.) = 7,920 HOUSE AREA (S.F.) = 2334.7 COVERAGE= 29.5% BLDG. HEIGHT= 29.2' AVG. BLDG. HEIGHT= 24.2' nvc. F.c.= u$, s FOR STAKING ° HOUSE AT MINIMUM SETBACK LEGENU: UUUTILITY PEDESTALS ~Z CHECK FORMS BEFORE POURING WATER SERVICE R=PROPERTY LINE C) of 48 HOUR N071CE REQUIRED w ~S SANITARY SEWER SERVICE BOW=6ACK OF WALK ~ Z • 2' STAGGER REQUIRED ~ LIGHT POLE FOW=FRONT OF WALK &FLOW LINE z~v ° 359. LOT COVERAGE FOR 2-STORY/ TRI-lVL ~FIRE HYDRANT EASEMENT 40% LOT COVERAGE FOR RANCHES ES CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION TBACKS: E R NIMUM SCaLE: 1°=20' INC. OMELODY HOM CENTER Of COLORADO ~ 20 DATE:O5-12-04 lfosf SXERIDANBLVD. 1oa'534$0a--9226700-~1ocHVC"rt°987 SIDE: 7•S~REAR: ' REV: WESTNINSTER C0. 80020 ~ 2~~ dn STREET SIDE: 20.0 BY: BMA PHONE: (303) 466-1831 ~yro~[NMYND MINIMUM ' JOB N0: SKY3 Fax: (303) 466-2368 ETWEEN STRUCTURES:15 B e y I ~ l ~ oW I J h ~.M! !SL ~I I u.a~ ; I ly ~ jF z 5b9'~'tfl'39^s' fi - ~ - ~ '0zl ^ ]!I V ]U ? f , ~ ~ lx ~ ry~ i i I j e L- - izo.oo s~ r- T ry ~o I ^o I $ ~ i I i 1 i 0a+ i s b I ~ nl I S I I p ~ I I : ir~ ; - • r i _ , ~ar ' mr 4 0"n, n va • _ _ 2-_' • ~ f I n y ~ I ~o' ~ I I i I~N' ' Iy ij' F i xo~ I ~ ---J n ' 'Tn ~ 12(j.0dv rn.a _~ae.rx d ..._~[l A m~3~~ I I n QI T _AH_. I I l I il v.a i I Z ^ ~C' bf i i I i I i L-= - - J' o i t - ~ ~ STM/DRN~TRACT i ~ I I • r " 120.00'n 1 ^ • ]YI .G • Ld' Y u'~ o~- oy- - - ~ ~ l us' 4 i ~ I ~ I g I~ I i i I z IG i I ~ ; ♦ ~ I L L-=T-~-- Z; izo~no' ~ ~ r - ~ ^ y I I y ~ B k q3 02 I ' $ ~ ~ ~ ~ JI~ 0 1 1 ~4 E ~ ~mI b ~x ' n.. , n~ p i i I :2 "L_'_--_ ` " 120.00 e a'n t • gW r___ _ _ _ k.__~ tOb I A I ~Q ~ ~ I I I ^ ~_j _..1 a ii i as•as•ae'w ,20.0o i ,^,i I I I I I di / * , 1... /NBL L uaeesaoc II 0 R ~ \ ~.o~ I J ~ ii I I~ \ ~ ;.a ~ i O' U L ~ I ~ ~C r~W~J # i I 4 Lu.q I •V ~ F ~ ~ c----'-~ a-- o~Ho q ' o NI^' ~ - J~ L ; , r uc • ~4 94.6@S ~ h I i i Vr- z I I ~ ~ Ir I ~ O tl , I ~ . m I i _j I "oi L k '___-e~ue.-6'_--- ' s STORM/DRAINAGE TRACT $ s ~ u o 00,0Z A 64 99.6B$ ' . $ o ,6'i L~ai i ~ Z i i I u ~ I ~ ~ ' __m^_'~ ~ I I I I a i - 9 ic aa Z L Ig L T _ ~0 - - - 8 L ;w~az r e~ue. ~ €4 44365 tl ~ ~ ~ 71 z I P ~V ~I ` 1cp1 m u i ~r , R#~ i L ~ • i " I ~ i . cni I u I 1 ~ ' I i i 'fN r~io0i I ~2 I i i ~;3 _ ~ L - 8 L_. L _ su , 6494~H~ 4 ° r--==- _ z e~~ ~ ~ O1 I ~ I u I I I I I~ = I I =m z I L---- = - ----J" ~ L- ~ e uc. ~ g e~uc 00' l c - -j s~r- ' z ( 2 I 6°1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n E t~ I u I J ^ . O~ y°y y 1+ ~GO I I+t ~k~n j\ S ~ I I i M~ I ~ i rrw ~ I _m i I ~ I L g v 00'OLI~'~~Ewn 6994.68 ~ s ue. u. _ b 9 tD ~ ~ I $ FI U I j ~ I B 1 ~1 I ~ ~ I N ~1 I I p I O I I y~ I dm O ~ I( z I L L- 100'0ZL . I e 2 ~ 7 C m ~ 11 y d" ~ Cy iA'R IIYV~~~ e- r- MATEF VARIES PER PQRGH 8" ~ ~ N fiXfi WELDED WIRE 6Xfi WELDED WIRE o N INDICATES PLACEMENT OF VOID 16" FTG-TYPICAL MATERIAL UNDER GRADE BEAM. ~ AS E M E N T UNLESS NOTED T N VARIES PER PORCH 8" 6 8" 4'-0" SHOP PRIMED F 2x6 PLATE W/MIN. 4" CONCRETE SLAB ~-rrn nnT nr E i ~ ~iFAI SEAL VOID WITH POLY. TYPICAL. 1 ~ 2-1/2"0 ANCHOR 5' MIN. WSX13 ON GROUND. BOLTS TO BUTTRESS. B o ~ 1 I i N TOP AND BOT. ~ - ~ ~ ~a °D - - f CONT. REINF. - T - T 1 1/2" CLEAR ~ _ ~ ~ 3'-10"~ ~ TOP OF HAUNCH TO P i io o BLOCK OUT 2-//4 X _i ~ AS SHOWN. BUTTRESS ~ BE 8" BELOW TOP i M FOR BEAM. OF WALL. tO 2 (1 EACH FACE) ~'-6~ o TURN SLAB EDGE ~ 2_#4 X ~ I DOWN TO HAUNCH B SEE SECTION 1 ON SHEET S-2 ~ ~ AS REQUIRED. B FOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL tO o B 7 WALL REINFORCING, IF REQUIRED. 1 d o ~ ~ i #4 X J N DOWELS ~ 8" O.C. i 10" ALTERNATE DIRECTION ? OF lEG IN FOOTING. 2-~4 (SIZE VARIES ~ f W 1 1/2" CLEAR PER PORCH) ~ 0 o q 2- 4 X "NUN AS SHOWN. CONCRETE ~ # 4 _4• SLAB. S (1 EACH FACE) F ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ POLYETHYLENE 1 ~ w °a Q w > w {C ~z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ o ~ ~ -m o ~ ~ SEE SECTION 1 I I III -I -~I ~ ~ v VOID BEYOND, SEE SEE F FOR DETAILS. r~ PLAN FOR LOCAl10N. PLAN B i c.~ w ~ c~ ~ > ®-:moo S ~ CTI O N 11 3ia~~ = ~~-o~~ SECTION 9 S HAUNCH AT END OF PORCH. r ~,.3 t1 N~ U} 8UTIRESS CONSTRUCTION s 59'-p., 10'-0" 28'-p" . ~i. p~~ g~_g» 2'_q.'° 3°_g" 7'-1 1/2" 5'_p" 2'_p" 10'-2 0 i' F--~ 2 1 m ~~i 0 f f d- t 0 T""' w ~ N C N ~ I STEP BOT. OF ~ ~ FDN. 4'-0"f. n C w in C+ J w P T I O N A L INDICATES PLATE N ~ ~ STOOP J LOCATION. TYPICAL. s1r t• r-- ~.J N 3~-6" X 3'-6") r- N ONnRuTeT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L--- ~ o PT. STOOP o ~ ~ i a ~ ~ „ PAD 3 --0 ~ r~ ~ o NLY. 4-2X4 POST P A S E M E N T s-- „ 2Q FTG. 24 X 24 X T 10 HICK w~ Q ~ ~o ~ - L _ - - - v. W ~ 5 EA~ WAY BOT, ~ ~ > <t m°~ STEP TOP OF i, J _ 1 t c~ n 1 w w gg y ~ 3-2X4 POS I ~ - S S" w X W JY SIM. PAD ~ r I ~ o Y 30 X 30 X 1 Q TNICK w w W 3- 5 EA. T. cv c WAY BC Yr w8x~ o NOTCH FDN. 8" MAX. FOR I ~ - - _ ~ V t ~ , , „ w 8 -11 ~ 13 5 1 2 , ~ ~ n~ ~ 4-~=- _ . - - ~ = _ - DOOR & MAINTAIN 24" MIN. 1~ c a ~ BTWN. ROWS OF REINF. _ ~ ~ (AT OPTIONAL DOOR ONLY). I ( i ~ STANDARD FRAMED BEAD '-mss 'n CONNECTION OR WELDED d" EQUIVALENT. I 4~ i R 1 r ~ 3°~ SCNEDU~E 40 00 ADJUSTABLE STEEL 3^ EXTEND REINF. TO PIPE COLUMN. END OF WALL. TYP. • ~ ~ 1 g~° g~_7~~ 15'-5 1/2" 4'_p" 13' t~ t r i G'( 1 N ~ i - r GARAGE r- \ d- 16' FTG-TYPICAL ~ 4 CONC. SLAB ONROUND t ~ ~ I I- UNLESS NOTED ~ r. 'f ~ N N N I~ ` _ 30" FTG. 3 4 ■ r•- { - STANDARD FRAMED BEAM 3"~ SCHEDULE 40 INDICATES PLACEMENT OF VOID CONNECTION OR WELDED ADJUSTABLE STEEL A _ A.._..„.. 4 ~ MATERIAL UNDER GRADE BEAM. EQUIVALENT. PIPE COLUMN. i ° SEAL VOID WITH POLY. TYPICAL I Op J 4.r T.~ t O W1ZXZ6 a r T~/. NOTCH FDN. 12" MAX. FOR 5 3"4~ SCHEDULE 40 - - 1 t - DOOR & MAINTAIN 16" MIN. ADJUSTABLE STEEL ~ Gj BTWN. ROWS OF REINF. PIPE COLUMN. 1 l o 2 ~ NOTCH FDN. 12" MAX. FOR STEP BOT. OF ~ DOOR & MAINTAIN 16" MIN. FDN. 4'-0"f• t BTWN. ROWS OF REINF. 1 ° ~ L L I N a ~ s 1 t~ r~ { MOVE ANCHOR BOLTS AND i t PLATE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL TO OMIT BRICK . ~ f RETURN. ELEVS. B & C ONLY. i~i~ i- 1> z ~ i- i 9 ■ ~1 L ,f. r 4 ,a - 9'-4" 1'-11" 16'-3" 1' 11" "PER 10'-0" ~ 19'-8 1 /2,> 4 1 /2' A 2 27'-11° 2. PROVIDE A VOID SPACE ABOVE OR BELOW PARTITIONS OVER SLAB ON I 1, 2'-4°I I, 171-4 1/2" ~f V V ( I 111..7 r2n LJ SHEET. 1 ' 11,. 9'-8 1 /4" 5-10 1/2" 9'-8 1 /4" 1/ [8 4th CAR GARAGE OPTION 1/4" 4 1/2 ;T 27 t-l 1 1) 1. SEE PLAN AT RIGHT FOR COMPLETE FOUNDATION. 2. SEE ARCH. PLANS FOR DETAILS. OF 2 3. SEE SHEET S-2 FOR SECTIONS, DETAILS & GENERAL NOTES. --5; F-.A n---F n n T T NI r-7 F=nilNInATT-nM 101-A--Nt- 4-/ .4 11- A I t-\ I i 2500/1000 ~'1 _ 2X PLATE ON TOP OF BEAM. DOUBLE 2X PLATE. ~ SEE DETAIL AT RIGHT FOR PLATE ~ AND BEAM POCKET PLACEMENT WITH DOUBLE PLATE. FOUNDATION 2-#4 TOP & BOT. WALL. CONTINUOUS. - BEAM P ~J'\/ r i.! art z III DOUBLE PLATE AN wt~ BEAM POCKET CONSTRI BRACE WALLS BEFORE ~ ~ AS W' TT~• t".... ~ BACKFILLING. W , w ~ N F- ~ ~ ~C ~ > S PL N C.~ ~ 0 'i i j ANGLE EXPANSION JOINT. t ~ ~IfLS. ~ o i~ 4" CONC. SLAB ON UNDISTURBED ~ ~ ~ SOIL OR COMPACTED FILL. .TR~~~E a~~ECT~oN ~ ~ W SCORE JOINTS IN SLAB AT i I~ I I-' ' ANC. m ~ ~ ~ MAX. 200 SQ. FT. AREAS. ~ I 0 a ~ J W W CO Q ~ ~ O Z ~ - ~ _ ~ ~ p Z - lY 1 r i r PROVIDE #4 X 1~-6" DOWELS ~ - CAD 2'-0" O.C. MAX. (MIN. 2 4" VOID BEYOND, SEE DOWELS PER PAD) POSY. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION. SEE BEAR ON NATIVE SOILS PLAN r~~ PLAN OR STRUCTURAL FILL. S SEE SOIL REPORT. i 1 F-7` i~ f~ I t REFER TO SOILS ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PERIMETER - Y DRAIN SYSTEM, IF REQUIRED. I I _ I R" I i 2-#4 TOP & BOT. N CONTINUOUS. EMBED 2X8 OR 2X10 CONTINUOUS BEAM P - - LEDGER W/2 ROWS OF 20d FORMING -'~r~ FLOOR F - ~ NAILS ~ 12" O.C. (1 TOP & 1 BOT.) ~A~QC.KFT STEEL PIPE COLUMN, SEE PLAN. 2-#4 FULL HEI OF FDN. WALL. ~ ~ ~ ~ Vl ~ OD®~ ~.L HEIGHT ~ ca ~ LOOR FRAMING NOT SHOWN. ~ i PROVIDE BASE PLATE 1/2" X 4" X 6" FALL. ~ ~ N -III' 1/2 SIMPSON U210 HANGER PLYWOOD BEAR BASE PLATE DIRECTLY ON BEAM. BEND 1'-~i" OV TOP OF WINDOV o LAG SCREWS AS ~ 3/4" T & G SUBFLOOR LYW000 SUBFLOOR ~ ~ SIMPSON 0210 HANGER o F~OOR FRAMING ~ ~ ~ n~ o 'I N ©0 W. ~ ~ Q CJ ~ ~ ~-FIl1 n M w> ~ ~ ~ REQUIRED FOR ~ STABILITY. W c~ w d ~ DRILLED HOLE I I N a N 2X10 FLOOR JOIST, FLUSH G SEE PLAN z # ~ MOULDING NAIL ~ 2'-0" 2'_p" WINDOW AS R ~ - - - - AT BOTTOM ONLY. o MIN. MAN SHOWN. - - GRADE GRADE AT AIR SPACE ao ~ ~ ao ~ , ~1 '=1 I I- I--~r III--i =1 I ~ CONT. BOTTOM s~ POLY. SEE SEE SECTION 1 ~ I I-III-III-III-III" FOOTING ' ~-III-III-I I= ROW OF ~EINF. 4" VOID BEYOND, SEE FOR DETAILS. POLY. SEE SEE SEC PLAN ;III-III-III-i I I- CONCRETE SLAB ' ~ ; ,III-_,I I I, ; INDICATES PLACEMENT OF 4" PLAN FOR LOCATION. BEAR ON NATIVE SOILS 4" VOID BEYO~<~, SEE PLAN BEAR ON WOOD 2X, NAIL VOID MATERIAL UNDER GRADE OR STRUCTURAL FILL. PLAN FOR LOCATION. OR STRU SEE SOIL REPORT. SEE SOIL TO SLAB. BEAM AND BETWEEN PADS. a SEAL VOID WITH POSY. TYP. I SEE PLAN FOR VOID LOCATION. (/k L J ~ C I ~ o I ~I ~ 1/2~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 o I V / 1/2" BEAM TO WAILL CONNECTION CONSTRUCTION OF VOID SPACE FOR PARTITIONS ON SLAB. DEEP BASEMENT WINDOW REINFORCING. GARAGE OR CRA TOP ROW OF REINFORCING. ~~N (~A~ NOTES f' t 1 1. LIVE LOADS USED IN DESIGN: MAKE TOP BARS CONTINUOUS WITH TOP BARS IN BASEMENT A. ROOF (SNOW)-------------------------------- 30 P B. FLOORS------------------------------ --40 P 2'-6" MIN. WALL. PLAN J C. WIND (BASIC WIND SPEED)------------------------g0 M TOP ROW OF REINFORCING. ~ EXPOSURE----------------------------------~ STOOP SLAB. FDN. BEND AND LAP AS SHOWN. W D. ACTIVE EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE-----------------40 PC t WALL ~ 2. CONCRETE: SEE SOIL REPORT FOR CEMENT TYPE. - BOTTOM ROW OF I t i REINF. EXTEND I BASEMENT WALL ~ r O - - I R `V HAUNCH I INDICATES PLACEMENT OF VOID MATERIAL UNDER GRADE BEAM. SEA~ VOID WITH POLYETHYLENE. 2-#4 X 2'-10" BOTTOM STEP IN FOUNDATION. o ~6-~ T_ Fem. (1 EACH FACE) S vVlVVh I lv(N VVf-1L1_ l\L.lIVI VIN l~11 Vl7 acs r~r~iv IIV IV WALL' VL-1\11 I ALL virvic-iv3ivi4z~ oGr VKt J I AK I IIVIi l;UNS I KUC. IIUN. A U IN U H L) L: I A i L 11-oll AT BOTTOM S.10 VI STEP BETWEEN GARAGE OR 6. A SOILS ENGINEER SHOULD BE CALLED TO INSPECT FOUNDATION EXCAVATI TO VERIFY FOUNDATION TYPE BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION. KCAVATION ALTERNATE BOLT ON HAUNCH BY OTHERS. CRAWL SPACE ACS & BASEMENT WALL 1/411 = 11-o11 WALL RE INFO JFOR-CING DETAIL 1/411 = 11-0" S 2 DIMENSIONS IN PARENTHESES AF OF 2 Ail