The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5365 Newcombe Street5S �S °ccupancy/Tv INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTION ONLINE FORM: http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/inspection INSPECTION REQUEST LINE: (303) 234-5933 Cancellations must be submitted via the online form before 8 a.m. the day of the inspection Inspections will not be performed unless this card is posted on the project site. **Request an inspection before 11:59 p.m. (midnight) to receive an inspection the following business day.** Inspector Must Sign ALL Spaces pertinent to this project Foundation Inspections Date Inspector Comments Initials Pier Concrete Encased Ground (CEG) Foundation / P.E. Letter Do Not Pour Concrete Prior To Auproval Of The Above Inspections Underground/Slab Inspections Date Inspector Comments Initials Electrical Comments Sewer Service Plumbing Do Not Cover Underground or Below/In-Slab Work Prior To Approval Of The Above Inspections Rough Inspections Date Inspector Initials Comments Wall Sheathing Mid -Roof Lath / Wall Tie Rough Electric Rough Plumbing/Gas Line Rough Mechanical Rough Framing Rough Grading Insulation Drywall Screw/ Nail Final Inspections Date Inspector Initials Comments Landscaping & Parking / Planning Dept. Inspections from these entities should be requested one week in advance. For landscaping and parking inspections call 303-235-2846. For ROW and drainage inspections call 303-235-2861. For fire inspections contact the Fire Protection District for your project. ROW & Drainage / Public Works Dept. Floodplain Inspection (if applicable) Fire Inspection / Fire Protection Dist. Final Electrical Final Plumbing Final Mechanical Roof 34 S' i Final Window/Doors Final Building NOTE. All items must be completed and approved by Planning, Public Works, Fire and Building before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Approval of the Final Building inspection does not constitute authorization of occupancy. *For low voltage permits — Please be sure that rough inspections are completed from the Fire District and electrical low voltage by the Building Division. Occupancy Is Not Permitted Until A Certificate of Occupancy Is Issued Protect This Card From The Weather City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 201705403 Pt ---w MIT NO: 201705403 ISSUED: 08/03/2017 JdB ADDRESS: 5365 Newcombe ST EXPIRES: 08/03/2018 JOB DESCRIPTION: Residential Re -roof to install GAF TIMBERLINE asphalt shingles with 29SQ REROOF 29SQ,6-7/12 PITCH, GAF TIMBERLINE HD IN WEATHERED WOOD *** CONTACTS *** OWNER (803)941-7956 MARTYNUSKA KENNETH M/SHERYL SUB (303)816-1888 Derek Lindsay 022377 Infinity Restoration *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE: UA / Unassigned USE: UA / Unassigned SUBDIVISION CODE: 2318 / RAINBOW RIDGE, SKYLINE ESTATES BLOCK/LOT#: 0 / *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 13,884.00 FEES Total Valuation 0.00 Use Tax 291.56 Permit Fee 267.70 ** TOTAL ** 559.26 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** Effective December 1, 2014, asphalt shingle installations require an approved midroof inspection, conducted when 25-75 percent of the roof covering is installed, prior to final approval. Installation of roof sheathing (new or overlay) is required on the entire roof when spaced or board sheathing with ANY gap exceeding one half inch exists. Sheathing and mid -roofs may be called in at the same time, one hundred percent of the sheathing must be complete and 25-75 percent of the mid -roof may be complete. Asphalt shingles are required to be fastened to the roof deck with a minimum of 6 nails per shingle. Ice and water shield is required. Eave and rake metal is required. A ladder extending 3 feet above the roof eave and secured in place is required to be provided for all roof inspections. Roof ventilation is required to comply with applicable codes and/or manufacturer installation instructions, whichever is more stringent. In order to pass a final inspection of elastomeric or similar type roof coverings, a letter of inspection and approval from the manufacturer technical representative stating that "the application of the roof at (project address) has been applied in accordance with the installation instruction for (roof material brand name) roof covering" is required to be on site at the time of final inspection. Roof inspections for ROOFS OVER 6/12 PITCH: 3rd party inspection will be required, the 3rd party inspection report will be collected at final roof inspection performed by City of Wheat Ridge. If report is not available the final inspection will not be completed. City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 201705403 PERMIT NO: 201705403 ISSUED: 08/03/2017 JOB ADDRESS: 5365 Newcombe ST EXPIRES: 08/03/2018 JOB DESCRIPTION: Residential Re -roof to install GAF TIMBERLINE asphalt shingles with 29SQ REROOF 29SQ,6-7/12 PITCH, GAF TIMBERLINE HD IN WEATHERED WOOD *** CONTACTS *** OWNER (803)941-7956 MARTYNUSKA KENNETH M/SHERYL SUB (303)816-1888 Derek Lindsay 022377 Infinity Restoration *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE: UA / Unassigned USE: UA / Unassigned SUBDIVISION CODE: 2318 / RAINBOW RIDGE, SKYLINE ESTATES BLOCK/LOT#: 0 / *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 13,884.00 FEES mi Total Valuation 0.00 — Use Tax 291.56 Permit Fee 267.70 ** TOTAL ** 559.26 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** Effective December 1, 2014, asphalt shingle installations require an approved midroof inspection, conducted when 25-75 percent of the roof covering is installed, prior to final approval. Installation of roof sheathing (new or overlay) is required on the entire roof when spaced or board sheathing with ANY gap exceeding one half inch exists. Sheathing and mid -roofs may be called in at the same time, one hundred percent of the sheathing must be complete and 25-75 percent of the mid -roof may be complete. Asphalt shingles are required to be fastened to the roof deck with a minimum of 6 nails per shingle. Ice and water shield is required. Eave and rake metal is required. A ladder extending 3 feet above the roof eave and secured in place is required to be provided for all roof inspections. Roof ventilation is required to comply with applicable codes and/or manufacturer installation instructions, whichever is more stringent. In order to pass a final inspection of elastomeric or similar type roof coverings, a letter of inspection and approval from the manufacturer technical representative stating that "the application of the roof at (project address) has been applied in accordance with the installation instruction for (roof material brand name) roof covering" is required to be on site at the time of final inspection. Roof inspections for ROOFS OVER 6/12 PITCH: 3rd party inspection will be required, the 3rd party inspection report will be collected at final roof inspection performed by City of Wheat Ridge. If report is not available the final inspection will not be completed. d City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 201705403 PERMIT NO: 201705403 ISSUED: 08/03/2017 JOB ADDRESS: 5365 Newcombe ST EXPIRES: 08/03/2018 JOB DESCRIPTION: Residential Re -roof to install GAF TIMBERLINE asphalt shingles with 29SQ REROOF 29SQ,6-7/12 PITCH, GAF TIMBERLINE HD IN WEATHERED WOOD I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications, applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with this permit. I further attest that I am legally authorized to include all entities named within this document as parties to the work to be performed and that a work to be performed is disclosed in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications. Signature of OWNER or CONTRACTOR (Circle one) /Date 1. This permit was issued based on the information provided in thepermit application and accompanying plans and specifications and is subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, po Flans and procedures. 2. This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the originalpermit fee. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees androcedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of the Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed. 4. No work of anmanner shall be performed that shall results in a changeof the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5. The permit holdy er shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services Division. 6. The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any provision of any applicable code or any ordinance or regulation of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to field inspection. Signature of Chief Building Official W Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. Dan Schultz "/-Y( J / /U From: no-reply@ci.wheatridge.co.us Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 9:43 AM To: CommDev Permits Subject: Online Form Submittal: Residential Roofing Permit Application Categories: Gina 1� - Residential Roofing Permit Application This application is exclusively for new permits for residential roofs and for licensed contractors only. This type of permit is ONLY being processed online --do not come to City Hall to submit an application in person. Permits are processed and issued in the order they are received and due to the volume of requests, time to process varies and is subject to change. YOU WILL BE CONTACTED WHEN YOUR PERMIT IS READY FOR PICK-UP AND WILL BE GIVEN A SPECIFIC DATE AND TIME WINDOW TO COMPLETE THE TRANSACTION. You will be notified if your contractor's license or insurance has expired, and you may update those documents at the time you are issued your permit. For all other requests: Homeowners wishing to obtain a roofing permit must apply for the permit in person at City Hall. Revisions to existing permits (for example, to add redecking) must be completed in person at City Hall. All other non -roofing permits must be completed in person at City Hall. The Building Division will be open from 7:30-10:30 a.m., Monday through Friday to process these types of requests. THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PERMIT. DO NOT BEGIN REROOFING UNTIL PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. Is this application for a residential roof? How many dwelling units are on the property? PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address Property Owner Name Property Owner Phone Number Yes Single Family Home 5365 NEWCOMBE ST. V SHERYLMARTYNUSKA 8039417956 Property Owner Email MARTYNUSKA@MSN.COM Address Do you have a signed Yes contract to reroof this property? It will need to be provided at the time of permit pick-up. Attach Copy of Contact Martvnuska.pdf CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Business Name Contractor's License Number (for the City of Wheat Ridge) Contractor Phone Number INFINITY RESTORATI 022377 3038161888 Contractor Email Address KELLY@INFINITYROOFER.COM Retype Contractor Email KELLY@INFINITYROOFER.COM Address DESCRIPTION OF WORK Are you re -decking the No roof? Description of Roofing GAF TIMBERLINE Material Select Type of Material: Asphalt If "Other" is selected Field not completed. above, describe here: How many squares of the 29 material selected above? Does any portion of the No property include a flat roof? If yes, how many squares Field not completed. on the flat roof? TOTAL SQUARES 29 (pitched + flat) of all 2 roofing material for this proj ect Provide additional detail here on the description of work. (Is this for a house or garage? What is the roof pitch? Etc) Project Value (contract value or cost of ALL materials and labor) RE -ROOF, 29 SQ, 6-7/12 PITCH, GAF TIMBERLINE HD IN WEATHERED WOOD 13884.00 SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I assume full Yes responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application. I understand that this Yes application is NOT a permit. I understand I will be contacted by the City to pay for and pick up the permit for this property. I understand that work Yes may not begin on this property until a permit has been issued and posted on the property. I certify that I have been Yes authorized by the legal owner of the property to submit this application and to perform the work described above. Name of Applicant KELLY CANNON Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. 3 INFINITY RESTORATION M� 2690 W. Main St Suite C Littleton, CO 80120 4 Office (303) 816-1888 Fax (303) 816-1889 1 BBB_ Property Owner's Name; J//t.E rt_ �'i,}�; r,t�.,gr/J A",aoh Property Address: <tMa.r - City: kt;v)*dr tate: Zip: Property Owner's Primary Phone Number: '303 ••'3dI 7`!S tr Mobile: ift.•ti yr 3 7 3 Approx Date of Loss: 5 ,} /7 Email: .M Ak r -f/L - 5 d A yt S c'✓ "t Damages Result of Winnnd and/or Hail or Other (specify if other):_ Insurance Company: Policy No: Agent's Name and Number: Adj. Info: Claim No: N`It,. Z7$' 0.77 Z- 1 hereby authorize Infinity Restoration to discuss the details of the project with my insurance company on my behalf, as the contractor, and proceed with all repairs authorized by the insurance company at a cost equal to the replacement cost value including overhead and profit allowed on the claim. Property owner agrees that Infinity Restoration is entitled to the Replacement Cost value plus any and all supplements necessary to complete repairs that are approved by (he insurance company, this includes code upgrade requirements. First payment is due upon completion of the roof replacement, the balance is due on work that has been completed, (such as the roof work) when the recoverable depreciation plus any approved supplements is received. Any remaining unfinished work, such as gutters, siding, interior paint, or any other trade, will be due upon completion of etch trade and receipt of insurance funds. The Property owners out of pocket expense will not exceed the Insurance deductible unless upgrades are agreed to in writing and added or depreciation is "non recoverable". Deductible is to be paid directly to the contractor (Infinity Restoration). Any upgrades or downgrades will be in writing. Property owner agrees to fumish Infinity Restoration with a copy of the insurance estimate and any other documents related to this claim immediately upon receipt. Infinity and its Authorized representatives are not acting as Public Insurance Adjusters - if the insurance company agrees to pay for the claim, and the undersigned does not allow Infinity Restoration to proceed with the roof project, a cancellation fee equal to 15%of this contract amount will be due to cover administrative costs associated with preparing the project. This contract includes the Additional Provisions on the back and contains our complete agreement. The specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.; Initial The Property Owner/Authorized Representative selects the following materials and directs Infinity Restoration to furnish this material and its labor in a good workmanlike manner according to standard practices in the industry. Any alterations, modifications, changes of additions must be in writing and agreed to between the parties as evidenced by their signatures. Infinity Restoration is not responsible for damage caused by improper original construction including faulty Gaming, masonry bracing and/or roof decks. Infinity Restoration is not responsible for rotted siding, paint and sheetrock damage due to vibration. Infinity Restoration is not responsible for damaged electrical, cable, A/C, or plumbing lines which are installed within 6 inches of the roofline. It is the property owners' responsibility to notify Infinity Restoration ofany deed restrictionslH.O.A. requirements. If, the undersigned fails to pay Infinity Restoration any amounts due under this contract within thirty (3M) days from the date of completion, and receipt of insurance funds, the undersigned agrees to pay all costs of collection plus a reasonable attorney's fee, should the same be placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, along with eighteen (18) percent interest on unpaid balance. This Contract Is Void If The Insurance Company Denies Full Coverage. The materials selected are as follows: SHINGLE e7/4T, .g,.r:�, , ' COLOR1-- 3STRIP OFF.J_ LAYERS OF EXISTING L.A— r....A r:% ROOFING C STRIP OFF WOOD SHAKE/SHINGLE �GW rK INSTALL RIDGE SHINGLES Dtv INSTALL INCH ENAMEL FINISHED DRIP EDGE/COLOR 1-44f4 d a- APPLY A .g i W LB FELT BASE SHEET 9- INSTALL A 5 L FHA OSE VALLEY OR FOUR(4) OR gS>1 V.." GALVANIZED NAILS PER SHINGLE S SIDEWALL FLASHING WHERE NEEDED C CHIMNEY FLASHING: RE -FLASH, CAULK AND PAINT C ALUMINUM WIND TURBINES RIDGEVENT f 7�, SOFFIT VENTS POWER TURBINES AIR HAWKS Al REPLACE ROTTEN DECKING AT A COST OF $60 DOLLARS PER 4'x 8' SHEET L4. CLEAN UP AND HAUL DEBRIS _l INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE: (If deductible is more dmn stated by Property 0wacr/Authorized Representative agrees to pay the difference.) UPGRADE TO THE MATERIAL AND LABOR . .jtr ,Q Pi uA6a wAAAA--" DOWNGRADES TO THE MATERIAL AND LABOR A.,cv S>A<,L x- ik- z? i Z''}, 30 TOTAL OUT OF POCKET EXPENS;': IN ADDITION TO INSURANCE PROCEEDS (Based on Replacement Cost Coverag :) I/We hereby authorize & instruct the insurance company and all lien holders to include Infinity Restoration as Co -Payee on any subsequent loss drafts or checks after today's date as indicated below. Print Name: + ! "f Tl 11_06.4,111.GL. Date: ')12,0 Print Name: Date: Signature: Signature: l t Representative:vPhone: j.. 2,%,' �_riu rn�x i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: T-- F r'., I Job Address: S"3LS' rxje w c n, Permit Number: SO 17 0 S- 41 Q 3 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time 10=1c A PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: � a S Inspector: -7-6 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE // Building Inspection Division ( (303) 234 -5933 Inspection line (303) 235 -2855 Office • (303) 235 -2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 4 f Job Address: Permit Number: !j ;2 a ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM /PM Re- Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re- inspection at 303 -234 -5933 Date: 11 Inspector: �,',�l DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE A 4' City of Wheat Ridge Faxed Roof Permit PERMIT- - 092203 PERMIT NO: ` 092203 ISSUED:' 09 /10/2.009 JOB ADDRESS:; 5365 NEWCOMBE ST EXPIRES: 03/10/2010 DESCRIPTION: Reroof 34 sqs.: with Arc GAF 30yr. * ** CONTACTS * ** owner 303./428 -2478 Ken Martynuska gc 303/455-3185 August Frankmore 09-0182 A Denver Roofing I * *.PARCEL INFO ** rf ZONE CODE: UA 'USE: UA SUBDIVISION:, 0049 BLOCK /LOT #: 0/ r FEE SUMMARY ** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 6.018.00 FEES c Permit Fee 181.10 Total Valuation .00 Use >Tax :108.32 * *.TOTAL * *' :289.42 4, Conditions: ; 6 nail installation :& mid roof inspection required:. Board sheathing spaced more than a 1/2 of an inch apart: requires plywood overlay on entire roof. Ice and 'waYar chiali7 =rA nisi rbA from 'rc �..a -o A.+o tr. O`4 r.cAo o.a o� -r'..r ...o'Il� aspection`. s, for work under this permit. Plans': subject to field inspection. date RESIDENTIAL SITE CERTIFICATION DATE: ' Z - o 1'1 ADDRESS: vF~,3&5 t.t~ulGOM~E 5~~~"r LOT: Co BLOCK: 3 SUBDIVISION: ~y_:~LI,rJB ESTAT~°-~cLi~Ik rJD 3 a--fh~e relative elevations at the referenced address were measured at the lot sides and corners, top of foundation and other locations as needed. The sides, elevations and drainage patterns as measured are in substantial conformance with the approved grading and erosion control plan for the referenced subdivision. ❑ The lot grading does not conform to the approved grading and erosion control plan The attached revised ref grading and erosion control plan reflects the existing grading at this site is functionally adequate for this lot and the overall subdivision. seal 4-) Sincerely, IMPRUVEMENT SURVEY Carroll s~. Lange= Pmiessional Engineers & Lana Surveyo~s ` / 165 South Union 61vtl., Suite t5fi Lakewootl,COloratlo 80228 (303) 980-0200 LOT 6 , BLOCK 3 io' U.E. I I F ~ a - - - ~ ° 41 I p_ ~ ,n ~n~ ^ pa x -~..q~' I D I 3 ~ I \ \ ` ~ I I ~ T i xd'~ ~ 129' ~ . I Q I C~Y I _ 2 STORY BRICK AND FRAME o I I I a 5365 I NEWCOMBE SIREET I ~ 21.3' ~ 10.4' I k ~~I9 ~ I 17.8 cF~ COVD. . . : ^ I K PORCH' w 10' U.E. ~ ~ -M - ~ 66. 00' 50073'11 "E . O. . << i . . F . _ c. NEWCOMBE STREET I I ~ ~n ~I a ~I 2 Q I ~ NI 9 1- \ ( TYP. ) I L R BOW ~ PLAT SCALE: 20' doe No: 3161 DRAWN BY: PEB DATE DRAWN:08-16-04 REVISED ISP: REVISED ISP: REGRADE: L_ F7 Q F_ N D • =FOUND #5 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP O=FOUND NAIL & DISK P=PROPERTY LWE BOW=BACK OF WALK I[=FLOW IINE =PEDESTAL j =SERVICE PROPOSED TGB= 50.9 AS-BUILT TGB= 50.8 , 0-_I~-- 10-20 I HEREBY CER11fY iHAT iHE F1EVAilONS LOTAND Ofi~IN~GE PATiERN SHOYM ON BLOCN3~ OF 9(1SAM€ EST~lES Ib. ] 111EPEQ! NFl1E OE~OPED iltMl A SURVEV OF THE AB0W OE$CFIpED PRWEFtt. PERFflM1E0 Ql THE UAiE 910MN, AHD ACqMAIELY ANO TRULY DEPICT THE El£VAMMS AS iHEY EIASTfD ON THE oAte or suo wRMEr. THE acunW El£VA11p15 AS DEPICIEfI HEREIXJ MAV CHRXCE SUBYWENT TO iHE DAIE HEPEOi DUE TO THE SUB9DPICE IXi U%IEAVAL OF TIE SOIL, Mpl10N OR qt FEMOVAL OF SOIL BY AC1S OF MMi, EROSION BY ME M1N0 qi WAIER qi OTHER iACTINiS. 1NEREFORE. TMLS SIIIiVET MAY ~ NOT ACCUHAIELY 1HE QEVATIONS NID OpAN1,1CE N OF iHE ABOK PROPER TE OF SIIRYEY 1HE El£VATq15 AND IXtNNACE PATIERN AB ~E SHONN ME THE REq51ERE0 LPNO SURbEICM'S CERTFlEO FlNqNCS IXi 1HE FlMSHm CRWND GRADES ARWNO YOUR RESIDENCE WI THE OATE SHONN YW, THE HdAEOMNEP, MUST MMNTiJN iHESE EIEVATIONS .WD GftADES TO PROPEIiLY OflNN iME WAIER AWAY FRpA YWR HWSE. THE 9UIIDER OF YOUR HpAE NiLL NOT COYflt SIRUCNRAL OAMA6E TO Yd1R HOME CAUSm A5 A RESULT 'Oi q1ANGE5 MME IN THE FlNISHED CWMES. MEREFIXtE, IT IS YOUR RESPON9BNtt t0 Y.UNTANI THE IXt0AE5 A5 SET 8Y THE BUII➢ER AND A5 CERiIFlED HEkEIN BY THE SURYEYOR. IN ,1Dp11tN1, THE H.O.W. PIiOIECTONS qJ YWfl RESIOEHfi PRONOED BY YWR BUILpER MiLL NOT COYER S1WIlCNRAL OAMA(iE CAIISFD AS A NESULT Of CMANGES MADE IN iNE FlNISHEO DRNNACE ORMES. 1HEREFqtE, IT IS YOUR FESPON9&IJrv TO YuNTAIN THE atnoes ns s[r er tMe ewinca AHO As ccRnnm er THE suRecraR ev BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WESj_ LINE OF LOT 6, BLOCK 3,OF THE RECORDED PLAT SKYLINE ESTATES FIIING NO 3 BEARING N00'13'11"W . WITH MONUMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON. THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE ANO CORRECT PLAT OF A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION THIS 13SH DAY OF AUGUST , 2004 , OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED As: LOT 6, BLOCK 3, FLOOD INFORMATION: SKYLINE ESTATES FILWG N0. 3, rHis PROaERrv ues wirHw mNE C. oESicNnrEO ns CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOODING, ACCORDING TO FEDERAL COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL N0. 085079-0005 C, STATE OF COLORADO RevisEp FEe.:a, 1998. (skruNe esTnres FLc. No a) AND THAT THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMEN` -R RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE PREMISES.-AR A'f~tY SHOWN. .:.i... ` BY: _ DATE: - r~~ iz, c THIS ,~URVEY DOES NOT ADDRESS EASE~IENTS OTNER iHAN 1HOSE'SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PIAT NOTED,IHEREON.' ND RL,_ ~WAS PROVIDEO TO THE SURVEYOR. NOTICE: nccoaoiec To caoanoo uw rou MUST COMMENCE ANY LECAI ACiION BASED IIPON ANY DEfECi IN 1HI5 SIIRVEY'M1NIN THREE YEARS AFfER YW FIftST DISCOKRED SUCH DEFECT.IN NO EbENT MAY qNY ACiION BASEO UPON ANY DEFECTiu TMIS SURVEV BE COAIMENCEO MORE THnN 1EN YEqRS FROM THE DNTE OF THE CERTIfICATIXJ SHOWN NEREON. 1...~.~ . n___ _ . , , t ~ ~ i~ r^; . . _ _ . . ~ . _ , - ~ . ' ! _K.. ~}~I . 4. r. t ~ 4 . ~ ~ Z DS O -1 O ` y t f m z - ~T w . ~ D ~ L= 1 - C15 Q-1.1 1 1 ~ _ N I I70 CTi \ ~ _ . i r ---T- i i o o _ , _ , , • , . ~lin ~ . . . . ~ ;R r , . . ~ , LM ~ x 4 ` w .P • ~ ~rl . . 0 ~ ~ 3 ~ a 0 ~ ~ m a O ~ ~ 0 0 ~ w m m 3 o. o o c N N ~ N y O a~ 3 " Sc m g n~ o ~ ~ c ^a a; ~ o ~ m m F n 3 ~ ~ m O O ~ = m m D O X ~ ,Tml ~ T fn O ~ ~ O D ;o m Z Z Cf) cn ~ C O m z n ~ -1 V m c ~ m a ^ 3 c ^ ~ = 3 s o m c~ ~ < a v m ~ Yo a ~ m H A ~ a w o ~ s~.m 1D ~ a nc A a ~ Q ro f g w ~3n C T m n~= H~ 9 o g m ~ o m»° a> > m tO ° o ~D O ° `D o °w G) m' ~ m ~ s~ 5 n ~ Q n g~p . ~ ~ o a o 9 N N a 3_ N O N ~ c d ~ a m u ~ m ~ a ~ w fD o d N N ~ P O 4 O O < A C (D N N p N r I~I H A ~ C~J ~ O^ l ^1 l 1 ~ ~ ~ l 1 ~ Date: 4/ ~ ~ A Certiflcete of Occupancy or Completion has been requested for: 5-3&r , PuRPOar or Building Department Remarks: Zoning Remarks: Public Works Remarks: Ar 6 Fire Marshall Approi (If Applicable) Remarks: A~ 3/ acl Sanitation District Approval: (If Applicable) Remarks: Water District Appra (If Applicabie) Remarks: INSPECTIONS WILL &3' meyzc~f ,seg - 9G,r <3 t l BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE BUILDING SITE 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29th AVENUE (303) 234-5933 INSPECTION RECORD JOB ADDRESS ~:~'::~KY-~1 ! t+~e(~ i,i FLt_~ . '~.1~. • -k 'elk 3 BUILDING PERMIT N0. DATE ISSUED TYPE I OCCUPANCY OWNER M..^...r',; f-. CONTRACTOR SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINES: NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST INSPECTOFi MUST SIGN ALL SPACES PERTAINING TO THIS JOB INSPECTION , DATE PECTOR Foundations Footings Caissons Reinforcin rMonolithic Weatherproofing (7),~ POUR NO CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED Concrete Slab Floor: Electrical (Ground Work) Plumbing (Ground Work) Of- Heating (Ground Work) DO NOT POUR FLOOR UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED Rough Electrical ~ _ I o - Q Rough Plumbing 7- S~- c„-f Air Test Gas Piping t~-GE} Rough Heating & Ventilation ~-Q Framing ` C) C~ C- Insulation `2- 1c f-- 6`1 Drywall Nailing e-x) _ o L4 Roofing Refrigeration Electrical Underground Final Electrical Plumbing Heating & Ventilation 2 1. 0(4 Frame R.O.W. & Drainage ~ p Fire Department ~ Parking & Landscaping p4 ~ OCCUPANCY NOT PERMITTED UNTIL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED PROTECT THIS CARD FROM THE WEATHER IMPRUVEMENT SURVEY Carroll s~ Lange = Pmlessianal Engineers & Landit I65 Soulh Union Blvtl . Sua 156Surveyors Lakewootl,COloraao 80228 (303) 980-0200 I c~~> I LOT 6 BLOCK 3 io' u.E. r-- - 1 ~ w I~ w ~ ~ w w x q q DAx I~ j I M ~ \7 ~ I II~ ~ 7 M 15.3' I I 0 I ' ~ I 12.9' 21.3 V d' I ~ ~I Z I'Op 8.5' 8.0' ~ I I 0 I 2 STORY M BRICK AND FRAME o I (N N a 5365 I ~ I I ~ NEWCOMBE STREET I ~ ~ I GG~~? x ~ 9 ' ~ ~I9 k ND 0. I ` I ~ 2i.3 ~ I ~ 10. 4" 17.8' ~r , . < J E I(TYP ) I ~ ~ ' COVD. ~ . : ^ I K PORCH ~ , ~ ~ ' k 1 . y~0 p' . ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ i N~ I I ` < I ~4 = I I J ~ ~ I U I eL ~°i J I _ - ~ a f U.E. ~ I ~ ~ 66.00' 50073'11 E ~ R A~ ` . ' ~ ~ eow . 0 L NEWCOMBE STREET PLAT SCALE: 1 = 20' JOB N0: 3161 DRAWN BY: PEB DATE DRAWN: 08-16-04 REVISED ISP: REVISED ISP: REGRADE: L EGEND • =FOUND #5 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP O=FOUND NAIL & DISK R=PROPERTY LINE BOW=BACK OF WqLK I[=FLOW LINE ❑ =PEDESTAL x V =SERVICE PROPOSED TGB= 50.9 AS-BUILT TGB= 50.8 0 1 C) 20 i Ncncer aWnrr nur nNc rLEvnnons ANO ORAINACE PATIFRN SHONlI ON LOT~~ BLOCK~, OF Mflll[ EfiAAS_ i iME11E0M WlME OE~OPED FTOAI A SUR4£Y or twc ,`eow ocscaNen rrtaPORn. PERF611Kp or+ THE oArz siwxN, nwo ACWRATEIY PNO TRUIY OEPICT iHE ELEVATONS AS iHEY E)OS1EU ON 111E OATE OF SA10 SIIMY£Y. 1HE RELATYE ELEVATd15 A$ MPICIED HEREdJ NAY ux KcwuvnL ar suL ar acrs or MAH, EROSpN 9Y THE MND OR 1ER IXi OIIKR FACTORS. 1MENEF~SURYEY MRY NOT ACWRATELY CT TIE ELEVATIONS ANO [1RAMIAff OF ME AB04E FlNISHFD GROIINO QUpES ARWNO YWR acsoMcE oN THE oatc swov.N Y011, THE HOMEONNEP, MUST MAINiAIN iHESE ELEVAPONS AND IX3n0E5 TO GROPERLY DRAIN iHE WATER AWAT FROM YWR HWSE. THE BUHAER OF YWR MOME N1LL NOT COYER SiRUCiURAL OAMAGE TO YWR HOME CAUSED AS A RESULT OF CHANCES MME IN THE nrasHEo cawcs. nHEqEf'one, iT is rouR RESPWSI&Lltt TO MMNTMN THE IXiMES A5 SET BY THE BULLDER MID NS CER11FlE0 NEREIN BY THE SURSEYOR. w Aownaa, THE H.O.W. anoMcna+s on TWR RESIDENCE PRONOEO BY YWfl BOILDER N1LL NOT COIER 51RUCiURAL DMAAOE CAUSED AS A RESULT OF CHMIGES MAOE Irv iHE FlNISMED DRAINAGE qtR0E5. MEREFORE. IT IS vWq FESGONg&IJiY TO MAINTNIN THE atno[s As set av me auiLDEa ANO ns CERTiKO BY THE SURKYOR BY BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 6, BLOCK 3,OF THE RECORDED PLAT SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO 3 BEARING N00'73'11"W . WITH MONUMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON. THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT PLAT OF A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION THIS 13IyDAY OF A• iST , 2004 , OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: LOT 6, BLOCK 3, FLOOD INFORMATION: SKYLINE ESTATES FILING N0. 3, THis PROPeRrr uES wirHiN zoNE C. oESicNnrEO ns CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOODING, ACCORDING TO FEDERAL COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE STATE OF COLORAD R"TE ""AP„P^"EL No. 0e5079-0005 c. Q~u~nuiwpau~u REVisEsDWl~a kruNE EsraTES FLc No s ~ AND THAT THE LOCATION~jq~'j~ : F ALL BUILDING IMPROVEMEN ~ WIfN; =VIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ~ TS-OF-WAY IN NTS BY OR ON THE PRE • A SHOWN. 1 ATtEST 7MAr TO ERC6Wlp~ ~NOYIL J % ~ • ~ THE AS-SI,MLT QADIIM nr~ cxAo"c ~o sv: R r_ DATE: iHIS SURYEY DOES NOT ADDRESS EA poldRWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT NOIED.-iEREON.~ T WAS~PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR. NOTICE: ACCOROING TO COlORA00 LA IA \ANY tEGAL AC110N BASEO UGON ANY DEfECT IN THIS SURVET 1NiHIN THREE YEARS AFiER Y011 fIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVFNT MAY ANY ACTION BASED .bIE(~;~ANN CTIN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS fROM THE DAiE OF THE CERTIRCATION SHOWN MEREON. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Building Permit Number : 17602 BUILDING INSPECTION LINE -(303-234-5933) Date : 8/24/2004 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303-235-2855) Property Owner: MELODY HOMES Property Address : 5365 NEWCOMBE ST Phone : 466-1831 Contractor License No. : 21948 Company : Greater Western Fence Phone : 469-8261 OW NER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurale, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easemenls or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree lo abide by all conditions printed on this application, and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (U.B.CJ and all other applicable Whga f~idge o dinances, forwork under t' ermiL ~ (OWNER)(CONTRACTOR)SIGNED L- .1 , Q DATE~ Description : INSTALL 16' OF 1X4X6' CEDAR TO BOTH WINGS Construction Value : $350.00 Permit Fee : $30.55 Plan Review Fee : $0.00 Use Tax : $4.20 Total: $34.75 Use : i BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Approval : TRC Zoning : PRD guilding CAmma[its:a Approval . Publ1s Wqrks Coments: Approval : Occupancy: Walls SIC : Sq. Ft. : oK Please Note: ~n/mntractor is responsible for Iocating property lines and consWcting improvcmerts ac-c•j;..,, to t1, ~ aPProved plan and reyuired devciopr,~~;:t >!_~r rftr,+,. The City is no[ res~ons d, ~r ru c,~ „ submitled «~itF:in the ' jjl e:rers resultin 1 • u.J ar~} a i;; g froun in,~~cur;;• ~ . Roof : Stories : Residential Units : Electrical License No : Company: Expiration Date : Approval : Plumbing License No : Company : Mechanical License No : Company: Expiration Date : Approval : Expiration Date : Approval : (1) This permit was issued in accordance with the provisions set forth in yopur applicalion antl is sublect to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Code of W heat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ortlinancas of the City. (2) This permit shall expire if (A) the work authorized is not commenced within sixty (60) tlays from issua date or (B) the building authorized is suspended or abandaned for a period of 720 days. (3) If this permit ezpires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount nortnaly required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans antl specifcations and any suspension or abandonment has wt exceeded one (1) yeac If changes are made or if suspension or abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full tees shall be paid for a new permit. (4) No work of any manner shall be done that will change the natural Flow of waler causing a drainage prohlem. (5) Contractor shall nWiWhe Buildi g-Irispe enty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections antl shall receive wdHen approval on inspection carU before proceediing-wlt es ' ases of the job. (6) The issna or t p drawings and specifcations shall not be construad to be a permit for, nor an approval ot, any violation of the prq✓' e ing er ordinance, law, rule or regulation. Chief Building Inspector Please sign Terms and Conditions on reverse side of page. rROM :GREATER WESTERN FENCE FRX N0. :970 284 6163 a 6111LpIqG IN6PECIWM LNE'~ CRY OF WI61lT P106E 1500NIE8T 39N AVBBAUE MIHEAT i'+E. CO iG033 -A~'~ APPLiCAT poopcryOwrrr. M t\c-Ay k'10~'/S Aopatr~ S3(.S r1`Evr.o r.5c 54'rcA, cuua.aarLmamexo_ d~qut~ compaw= ~aiwrauneaFUC~snu~o.a no ~ ~ nsa►er am" ad vw a•"Gk v CO'ICrd~. M7lmw6 p n s1eMrand Y~OOl 11040 mrB M N OOPmO16_0- 0p 116 al DascriPqorc 54. Fi added Rug. 13 2004 06:26RM P1 ---'----baeo: ~e: 303-'~(ob-1$31 pbunw- 343-4 I - ga(a t mra ~ ~ I I permR Fee:f planReview Pe~.S iias Tss-S' aaa r' I To18L'S i x''l xla ` ta.dc~t bo~+ 41~• JS - Ow% 54R.- ~..,~.~o. Appwwat Zonug ff-P I A1.~~~ Y Vhft Poot storier. Relifti" Lkm'ksc GI84Lw,o I.imm Pkwfttl I..IW m Iw- AWmR.a Ikwm NO. r~'pa'l ~ awation DOW. Eq*abon DatE ~ Daox -ur~ ~ tl) ThbP~~vwAiiaeoeN~eww~MP~!saetfeby~Yourappfee6e~an['saiij~etAFs6wsaf1M9d1ed - e:.~e - ~ ' ..v~aram~utlsad~r~oesd 1110 city- I10u119Ard1p(~~h0 ~ T~jppywxyha Sab9W (I1)tlYMO1ki1d101md if1YlCOIAIMIIOld~~~~~ - ay gsampendedorype,doneqiar api d 77A dmYc- rmcPemitemivs.anewaa~~Y~~ieratrafaw~ufaeamrRmma!/omNbw4p~dnodvm"s loaa6Mnariilw rre inbai~NP~d~saA~o~sadarymtprsbnar+6rd°wnwImnetev.eaUeeo,r mVwr. .dment...e.emwi~or.ewAan.dmaa~e~.mllem'b..a.saereeaa+for.n.»naIa. ~ Nevwkaor•.a..rsfolweawfi#v7dw4oeuv.oxWno.+af..~eao~ina•. a omtl"L camwer aw now+h+ a+oo remimwresy4ww RA nw.s in aaw~. rerr iaPedwas .m au waeNev~ ,ppay qnyrypec~n esi eaiwa pamsefq wih ~w qtoas dl~e id+- ~ TMix~odapomilartlwsiP~;~ad qwMbm 71WnatbsameeuWb6eaP~afor.rorao afpqral d. anYMd-on effie PovNiansdew- IN9 ved"' aairyawerad~siem. hw. nb ve.0da0ioa CFIICf ~ Officied FROM :GRERTER WESTERN FENCE FRX N0. :970 284 6163 Rug. 13 2004 06:26RM P2 Mp.g75 P.7 AU6, 4,20 2:W P LO T P LA N FOR MELODY HOMES Nc. LOT 6 HLOCK 3 SKrUN:' ESTA7ES FlLING 3 . CITY OF.J~l.H AT RIDGE. COUNTY Of ON STATE OF COLORADO. ADpRESS 5365 NEWCOMB p 51. N •1 11 N .0 • u.c to' U.E. -I ONO ~STBACK - - - - -I ~51 _ ~ 'I ~ t • LO 6 I I f 920 Sf. I 7 W Ig . ° , 1.0 - ~ • ~ • ' ,e ~ I I JI 13r. , ~ ~ w o~ io e~ ; ~ 5 3 flAR ~ J ~ 4l~Rr ~ I d6' a ~ G~RKC I d ~ 9 I n ' I 6 IRl.i+~. I. N ~ I • f f~ wVoVnr ~I~ p o~ p I R I g G L p-- I M t1 ~ ~ 70' U.E I i 47.0 rJ 1 1 _ 1 NbNCQNBE STReET amouLmm , 1~ 11{~p ~1~a cllYi~ M sOmm~nrs~' m ~ 4 ~ M~ ~'31P1~ lO4 O{I~w " IW~S ~ pp~1C~~y ;~SIIIA ~OPA7sM4R~~~9ArtM[ ..09TA047e izW11m 7q-iYL MEIADY HOMES rram strRmwffim .ssema,aw m foose iuc rilW/ D(,wsl ue-m(,109/ ~M-ffNi ~ +-~'eoo-9u-iea7 .su-e7oo• a- . ~ i I ~ MODO. 2624 RH FJ,EV. A U)T qlle 1JI~A (SF.j - M QOY(IUCE ~ y WiNOCMM1 ~ 7g~ ~l.7~6 AM. F.G. t10.i 7~1~ SFRMf~ SwRNlr s[wER SERNCE LMi17 O4E iME NFdiN1T 1 ~iava~~n u~r , zaalL scuF; 1'=za oaM' »-04 REV; BYt BMA ' JOB NQ SKY3 . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Building Permit Number : 17114 BUILDING INSPECTION LINE -(303-234-5933) Date : 5/21/2004 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303-235-2855) Property Owner: MELODY HOMES, INC (SKYLINE FILING 3) Property Address: 5365 NEWCOMBE ST Contractor License No. : 21279 Phone : 466-1831 Company : Melody Homes Phone : 466-1831 OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurete, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of W heat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this applicalion, and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheal Ridge Building Code (U.B.C.) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge ordinances, for work under this permit. (OWNER)(CONTRACTOR) SIGNED Y•IMLX DATE S- ZS•O Construction Value : $206,943.00 Permit Fee : $2,070.91 Plan Review Fee : $100.00 Use Tax : $2,483.32 Total: $4,654.23 , • 1► 5$.~~ Description : 2624 A- W/ 3 CAR TANDEM GARAGE BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Zoning Comments: SIC Approval : TRC Zoning : pRD BuildEng Co,mments:;, Approval: CR Public Works G4mments: Approval : DFB Occupancy : R-3 Walls : 2X6 Electrical License No : 21284 Company :Thunder Ridge Electric Co. Expiration Date : 2/28/2005 Approval : OKIKS OK Sq. Ft. : ISo oo_ 5463 o Please rP: 1n~ ~d Co ~~hn re P ns b~e for lo 5/14I04 ~C v~P1an and r~ ui ed L`ments a ~c ~Yfs~tKS q develoPment sublWited ep set an ~Y OK. 5114I04. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS-rftu d con ~ info~ Roof : Stories : Residential Units : 1 Plumbing License No :19354 Company :Millwood Plumbing & Heating Expiration Date : 5/25/2005 Approval: oklks Mechanical License No : 17790 Company : Four Seasons Heating Expiration Date : 5/30/2004 Approval: pK/KS (1) This percnit was issued in accordance with the pmvisions set foAh in yopur appliwtion and is subject to the laws of the Slate of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Buildin9 Code of W heat Ridge, Coloredo or any other applicable ordinances of the City. (2) Thls permit shall expire if (A) the work authorized is not commenced wilhin sixty (60) days from issue date or (B) the 6uilding authorized is suspended or abandoned for a period of 120 days. (3) If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifcations and any suspension or abandonmenl has not eaceeded one (1) year. I( chan9es are made or if suspension or abandonmenl exceeds one (1) year, full fees shall be paid tor a new permit. (4) No work o( any manner shall be done lhat will change the natural Flow of water causing a drainage problem. (5) Contreclor shall nolify the Building Inspeclor hventy-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspedion card before proceediing with successive phases ot the job. (6) The issuance of a permil or the ap r v I of drawings and specifcations shall not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, any violation of the provisions of t)qb~ylEing co r any othe ' ance, law, rule or regulation. to ,t Cf~efBuilcllhg InspIractor Please sign Terms and Conditions on reverse side of page For inspection this permit must be posted on the site and visible from the street TERMS AND CONDITIONS As applicant for a building permit in the City of W heat Ridge, I do hereby agree to the terms and conditions set forth below for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy in connection with this building permit. The issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy requires: 1) The completion of all required landscaping and related site improvements. Inspections are performed by the Planning and Zoning Division. 2) The completion of site drainageJgrading requirements per the approved site grading plan and/or final drainage report and plan, if such report and plan is applicable. For all residential and nonresidential projects with an approved final drainage report and plan, a letter of certification is required from the civil engineer of record. Inspection are performed by the Public Works Department. 3) The completion and acceptance by the City of Wheat Ridge of all required public improvements, or a Development Covenant or cash escrow may be required in lieu of construction, as determined by the Public Works Department. The Public Works Department performs public improvements inspections. 4) The completion and approval of a Certificate of Occupancy Application form and final inspections. Inspections are performed by the Building Division. All the above items must be completed and approved by Planning and Zoning, Building and Public Works before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Final Inspection by the Building Division does not constitute authorization of a Certificate of Occupancy nor permission for occupancy. Occupancy of the structure is not permitted until the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. (Uniform Building Code, Section 109) The City is not responsible for any real estate closings or other agreements concerning the property which may be affected by failure to complete the above items and obtain a Certificate of Occupancy. I have read, understand and agree to the foregoing terms and conditions. I have received a copy of the application for Certificate of Occupancy. Name (please print) Signature: `►w~nE. Date: COMM[JNITYDEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT i g BUB.DWG IIYSPECTTON LINE - 303-234-5933 CITY OF WCiEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH A'VEIr'UE a~^ WHEAi RIDGE, CO 80033 -(303-235-2855)Y= PropertyOwner./l/Y.lUC,(.X) 1'(0y12Q,6, J~A(=, PropccryAddress: ~~L.JjAtjCGN-l.~ 51. Conaactor License No.: Companr 1'YId.Lc(n 4r)vin 0 n . 1;-7e- Building Pemrit Number. OV bate: Phone :,~03-- L( 60-(,573 01%Y•EWC0NTRwCIOA SICNATURE OF tiNDElSTAMDIKG.NO AGREFMCMT _1 nj I hercby caufy that Ux sctbxk aiiwica yrapose0 by 1hu pernut applicafian ue aceuratc, C021St11lCLlOf1 V21LC'.$,~ ~ anWdo not vidsmapplipbkardimnoa, n,ks orregul.rionsohhe CieyofWhwiRidgear <ovenants, c~semania m restrictians ofraord; Ihet ~II tteaw~ertxn It shown. and aileg~ liona ~7 permitFee:$ U -~ic~ ~U. rNde ve accurelC, IhH I htw tead ynd fgeE m abide by ail mnditions arin1ed an il.:y apptiatim ana thai ! tasume Nn rnpmsi6iliry tar complianct with Nt 1Yhm Ridge Plan Revie.v Fee:S `60 ( 9uilding Code (U.9.0 snd all aher appiicabk Wheat Ridge Ortlinances, far work undo USC T2X:$ this pmnil. Total: $ IOwT'ERXfONiRACTORkS1GNED pq7E 10WNE0.ACVNjRAC7pp):PRINTED_ DAiE uFscRIrTion: je;;2u l9- tol TCt vYe&t~ ~ I ,:d4 HUILbiNCr DEPAR7'MENT USE ONLY 7-omNO Corream: Approval: 4&1~ zmin8_ Ff:~> suuoINa Co.meNrs: ~ Approval: vuffucWwuucorrrxia: OK; .t.~V,6, 5Ii~/`oZ/ Appmval: Occupancy: R 3 Wills: :21(G Rooi Stories: ResidmtialUniu: Elatrical License No: ?lumbing License No: Mechanicat License No: coa,ranr-i"h"~Q~.i ~~~ce co~x ~M1ic.~Q ~btic~x F"cu.~ ~uk'k-o ~ Expiration Date: Fxpirsrion Date: Exp"ustion Dau: Approval- APProvzl: Appmval: ..en (u n:.wanek •'+sUweam,xoN.aft widdcym.+dms».+o-ai.ya++pp6c.um..auwbj.cl auKrw<orm.sdrorcowneo.wmdKzouiB RcZOAdars and Bw7dinY CodudM2an 1tidK.Caktado v uY dhaqpio6k ad'm+nca of iEe Clb. /Z) TEuprn"wshaleap" i[</aJKMarkaudeittdBeacam~.wcadei0desWrylb%mYs 110111 Vwtdaam(H)dybaldloLiwhaixedisfu+peoJeda +d*do1wd faa periaA ef IM day{. (3) If this pem.itupiru, a un.' pmnk roar E. ~quird (a a f« ef ow-Falf iM ananun eternelh'mquued yroridcd oo chaosu p,v<Lua m will bc made +n tlw aiguW pMns aed fperifiutioae aad mY ~ a~Ewduuoau Aa en e*~ded one (I) ym. If <6~np Mre E~ « if a~.ao+ w fWbMmCw cT ...a. a.e(I) Iw, futl ka a.! b.pW 6or & acw p~ f:aanorkofaayemnasbeLedoaeiDMwlsWngeWemwNibad.wkruuwlab+matEpoE4r^. (5) ca..xw se.n mpfr ar e.aein{ I.yenu twe.p-rav (24) mva:n w.,xe ra.9 wspx9or uw aL.9 ~iw ..rium.pm.,al on lnryxsioo a,a 6e(at Nomftt wiih suanete pYaesaflqe jel. (6) iAeiwwxeofapn+daia6.qnw~ddia ' fiwdamatl sabecauwed bbeav~h iar.ear. 'n WaA~'+l W, aa7vblaumof%he pmisionf ~isg d rntrs a pylaw, me a*eNNlae. ,20s:XEJ Pld 8 JNINNHId zo•jowwTZ:si nooz 61 Ae zs8as97 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW FEE STRUCTURE FOR BUII,DING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: rJ- Z5 ' D'-( Phone# 303'41"l$31 Applicant: /✓~co..~~3c= Location of Construction: 53&5 Sr~e~- T Purpose of Construction: 5~.~~cs F•rw+i~s~ ~ESiD~tE Bu ilding Permit Value: Single Family X Commercial Multi-Family DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES Development Review Processing Fee: $100.00 $ /00' co (for document processing) Single Family Residence Review Fee: $50.00 S $o • o0 (for review of applicable technical documerts) CommerciaVMulti-Family Reszew Fee: •(for review of existing technical documents) $100_00 S •(for review of technical documenu for conswc[ion in Right-of-Way, Final Drainage Report, and Erosion Convol Plan) S500.00 5 CDOT Access Permit Fee: $100.00 $ (for documeN application and processing) Traffic Impaa Study Review Fee: $100.00 E (for document review and processing) Ftood Plain Variance Review Fee: kfor document rcvicwand pra;cssing) Class I Application: $300.00 S Class I Publication/Notice N/A Class n ppplipbon $750.00 S Class II PuWiption/Notice $90.00 S TOTAL REVIEW FEES (due at time of building permit issuance): $ /So . o0 PLEASE NOTE THAT IN ADDiTION TO TfE ABOVE FEES•'I'1-IE1tE WII.L BE ADDI770NAL UCENSING AND PERMITfIr1G FEES REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCT'ION OF IMPROVEMENTS WITFIIN PUBLIC RIGHT-0F-WAY. Signature Date 5'~-0`~ of Applicant' ' ~X. 0.wOb03 04 ~~T DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WOAKS BUILDING PERMlT APPt►CATION REVIEW Dacc: 5j1`/ O`f coLORP Location: ~3L^5 /1f /-0C~0Ml3ti S771L~T Attention: Building Department ] Aave reviewed the attached materials submitted in application for approval of a S~NGc.E FaH~t-5~ ~2~siD~.~tc at ihe above refaenced addrus. Pleaze note the summary comments below. 1. ✓ Boundary Closure: _ OK _ Not OK; refer to stipulations. 2. ✓ Drainage: a. Drainage plan and report needed _ b. Drainage pian na needed c. Lot drainagdgading to bc reviewed by Building Division ✓ d. Si1t drainagdgading provisions fiave been reviewed ard are: (r-~,e o vE2~7- ✓ OK Na OK; refu to stipulations. 3. ✓ NPDFS Permit Required: _ Yes ✓ No 4. ✓ Public lmprovements: a. strat paving ncoded: Yes ✓ No b. curb and gutter neufed: Yes ✓ No c. sidewalk needed: Yes ✓ No d. svxt lights rceded: Yes No c. storm xwer needed: Yes ✓ No f. later of credit required: _ Yes ✓ No If a letter of credit is requ'ued, for what improvtmcnts? ,✓~s~- Amount of Ictur of acdir. N/ir 5. ✓ Subdivision Agrxment tequvcd: Yes No 6. Deveiopment Covenant requ'ved: _ Yes _ No If Yes, for 7. ✓ Traffic impact analysis and repon required: Yes ~ No 8. _Z State Highway Access Pertnit needed: Yes _v' No 9. ✓ New rosdway or alley R.O.W. dedication recommended: _ Yes ✓ No lf yes, wha[ is recommended? ]0. ✓ All ezisting dedicated roadways/alleys moet the snndards of the Ciry: ✓ Yes _ No If no, which do nol ard wfiat is requcsted: .✓Lf l I. 12. '`,]/`t Signature David F. Brossmtn, P.L.S. Date CsRiFD/.v/i GE.~T~FiU~~OnI LET7E~E FRo.N F'E. 13. ✓ Stipulations anached: ✓ Yes _ No oir- C. o. 14. ✓ Surtunary Comments: Anv dama¢e W the czistine Public Imtxovcmrnts u a result o( Utis construction is to APPROVAL: Ttrc Public Works Department haz reviewcd this requcst and bereby giva iu approval, subject to the above and/or attached stipulaaons. Signature David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Date NO APPROVAL: The Public Works Department hac rcviewed this request and dots not give its approval tor thc reazons stated: *Mdg, tsy oepxm,errc d vubk wwft DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 7500 WEST 29T" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC INIPROVEMENTS RESTORATION DATED S/iy1,ny Dear Contractor: ADDRESS S3CaS ~J~c.~c-.o.~c13~ S~.-T In conjunction with the approval of the building permit application for the above referenced address, this letter is to inform you that all existing public improvements located along the frontage of said address shall be restored, (if daznaged from related construction) to an acceptable condition, as determined by City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Department, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to any construcUOn commencing, the Ciry's representative will conduct an onsite inspection to determine the existing condition(s) of the public improvemenu at this address. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, A2...oka A,.oo'."a.' David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cci File Rev M03 -A A ~ m ~ ~ = I ~V ~ nim I ~I ~ 1~ I N 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~a E~ ~ Iy i i ~ I I i ' Z 15B$_!$'491~' $ ~ ' I e Z ~ ]'ll. T A.~ e' = i I I Ix t i i ~ a ~ i i I ^ Z I r-' i- i i m i J o L --J' - ~ - - - n 3'11.5 ~20.~0 s ;r - - - - ~ Y o - - e~~ I 6b ^O i l M1m ~ . e I i ON i I ~ Q I Z ~ M N i~ ~ 4 552d~ - - - a z m - ! W ~ b 3'll .C K "f ~b ~ ~ ~ I 6 .ltrt ~ ^y~ I i N I 1 ; 1 FK / ~ ~.~K I r ' ~ ~ i i I I Z ~ I y rn J L ~ b .OO~ ]n .4 O 4 12 W _ ~ ~ i ~ IY id ~F E~~ I g I ~e z I~i ~ o3i ~ ~ I J J ° L-= z - • 3~.~ - x 3 s N ~ STM/DRN TRACT i '4 120.00' 3 .0'M b I[ 3"~ .f • ~ _ ~ ip'e I O~n i_ g I I ~ ier~ ' ~o i I ~ • ---..R--- .o.. , l _ I prI L_'---__ - izo.od• 3 7.1i ~r-i_-- L I ,6e , -----1--AT'- . i v ;i, i ~ ~ ~a ^ I in Z I~ I ~ i cn J I ~ i _ L - - _ s~. ~ iio~d' .rYn ptt o _ - y_" ' _ r- - - - ~ : I b~ i ~O I I I I z I ~ I ~ ~ w J 1 ' .o~• v.~ . e I ~ ~ b _ 1-~~ y m L-= ~~.s ----J - Z I 89'46'49"W 120.00 p E- a m O ~ z F Wry ~ ~a a ~ w a rn W F h z ~ ~ hl i i i I i I LS'6l l 64 94.6H5 1 ~ - ~ f------------1 ~ , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I m I fim yJ ..e. ' ~ J I ~ I ~ v ~ ~ S~ $ ~ i - i i yJ Ifim _L _ ~J Ic0 v L;- . ~fi-£ 5'UL I ~Y9.ed~ ~O L • q r i . _ _ . " I u ~ I' 3 I I 0.. g g' L!- J na - _ STORM/DRAINAGE TRACT $ • i .00,0Z L M 6Y 94.695 R ' g r 41 e' uo_ ~ p r Oil [u pp ~ W 1 1 I i 1 ° I _m om y $ I I ~ I~ $ ^ I u ~ "I W 5 ~ I ~I ~ B I~~ VI-~~ I I ~II M I ~ m I I 1 OO I~iI_W ~ I~ I m I z IG L n L .s. e' uc 8 $ a r--- n i ~ _E_- Mi z o~r-- o~°~ ~ T~ 6 ~I ~ ~ Vr~ I ~ l =m y z IC L p L u. su~ ~yZl ~~~SY~83` ~ ¢ ~ Q- uc - _ - - 4 w I F 0: ~ ~ ( ' I ~ I J = I I , I B I T I N~~I I II= o o b I~ I~ Z I'~ L x L ~ __w u.L -l 649.~`iff5 L c r--- 5'YL . ~ r ~b1 X~ 4 " I i $ I w I i ~ I I I ~1 I n I B 1 ti-i I a~ ~2 1y b = L- \ PLOT PLAN FOR e) MELODY HOMES.C. LOT 6 , BLOCK 3, SKYLINE ESTATES, FILING 3 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON , STATE OF COLORADO. ADDRESS 5365 NEWCOMBE STREET NO0° 1 3" 1 1 U.E. ~ ~ II -~I f, I ,I ) F-SETBACK >I ?I ~I Q I .rp(r ~ 545. 2 w ol :j C~I 2624 BSMT ~ a ~ S, ~I I N I I d 5' I n I ~ a ~ o 8. 66.00 10' U.E. ~ LOT fi 7,920 sf. I I ~ cRAw~ ~ J 10.8' I ~ 3 CAR RiGF}T Ni GARAGE I +5~ ti ~..i I 10.4' 17.8 ' ~ I L_ PORCYI_ DRIVEWAY I ~ - - ~o o ~ ` - - - - ^ ~ - - 10' U.E. N FC)OTS I "'~IC) w I~, 1.0' 2 I ~ ~ I "l 8 ' 0 a ~ I ~ 48.OI II ~ o, I~ol~ L 1E ) 46.341 N(1(7" 1.5 1 1 W hh O() 47.001 N /A1,EWCCS11t~t ST'c,EL T PENERAI. NOTES 1. THIS PIOi PLAN DOES NOT SHOW LOCATON OF RINDOW WELLS. FOR h1EIR LOCATION SEE STRUCNRAL ENGINEERED PLPNS. 2. DIMENSIONS SHOVM AROUNO THE PERIMETER OF R1E STRUCIURE ARE i0 THE E%iERIOR FOUNDAtION CORNERS. 3. PRONDE AND MAINTAIN POSI7IVE DRAINRGE AWAY FROM ALL FOUNDAnON WALLS PER WARRANTY REOUIREMENTS. (0.55 MINIMUM SLOPE FOR CONCRETE PANSJ 4. THIS PLOT PLAN SHOWS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ONLY. FINAL CONSTRUCTON MAY VARY. 5. FOR OUESilONS REGARDING T1E FOUNDAt10N DURING EXCAVATION, FORM SETTINQ AND HOUSE CONSTRUCTION REFER TO T1E ENCMEERED FOIINDAl10N PLANS. INFO STAKE: MODEL 2624 RH 3 CAR ELEV. A LOT AREA (S.F.) = 7,920 HOUSE AREA (S.F.) = 2294.03 COVERAGE= 29.07 BLDG. HEIGHT= 28.25' AVG. BLDG. HEIGHT= 23.25' AVG. F.G.= Sp. Z & APPROVED FOR STAKING ° HOUSE AT MINIMUM SETBACK LtGtNU: LJLJUTILITY PEDESTALS ~ z CHECK FORMS BEFORE POURING O C E WATER SERVICE 1~=PROPERTY LINE ~ ,A 48 HOUR N TI E REQUIR D OO SANITARY SEWER SERVICE BOW=BACK OF WALK Z ° 2' STAGGER REQUIRED l;X LIGHT POLE FOW=FRONT OF WALK 00 rL=FLOW LINE z U ° 35% LOT COVERAGE FOR 2-STORY/ 7RhLVL ~FIRE HYDRANT -""""'SETBACK 40% LOT COVERAGE FOR RANCHES ceccucur CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION MINIMUM SETBACKS: 1°=20' @MELODY HOMES INC. CENTER OF COLORADO 0 FRONT: 20 SCnLE: 1f03f SHERIDANBLYD. 1-800-922-1987 . 5'REAR: 10' SIDE: DATE:04-19-04 WESTMINSTER C0. 80020 iNUrnro °P 534-6700 p(NVER • - STREET SIDE:20.0' REV: gY: BMA PHONE: (303) 466-1881 H[pK Ypl q0.N.10[M dGV~lt Ma,~,~, ~.~m MINIMUM ' JOB N0: SKY3 FAX: (303) 466-2368 BETWEEN STRUCTURES:15 Recessed Residential Worksheet (SF/Duplex) 'Z7 1# Submittal requirements: Copy of Deed R1 Site Plan (to scale) ~ Elevations ~ Address: 'rJ365 N2uJCDw-~ ,5t• 2VZ4' ' Zoning: Use: M S Property in the flood plain? NJ Lot Size: ~ sq. ft. Lot Width: ' (eg' ft. Maximum Lot Coverage: 4-o % Proposed Improvements: S' 34 House: ZO sq. g fr. Addition to House: sq• ft. *Shed: sq. ft. Detached Garage: sq. ft. Proposed Lot Coverage: (Total) Z(p 25 % sq. ft. 7_o65 -3+' sq. ft. sq. ft. Required Setbacks: FR ZO Provided Setbacks: FR 21 rS 7,~ S 7•~ R l0 s g s x 40•4 Maacimum Height: 35 ft. Masimum Size: Proposed Height: Owto ft. Proposed Size: 3►-1'1 • (9- sq. ft. 20o5 • -6: sq. ft. Access Notes For one and two-family dwellings, the first 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar ma[erials. For all uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer than 25' to any property line, except when used as joint access for [wo or more lots. In residential zone districYS, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 fee[ in width. One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the stree[ accesses aze at least 30 feet apart, measured from the interior edges. For all uses, one access point per property is permitted. *Metal sheds in excess of 120 s.f not allowed. Landscaoine Notes For one-and two-family dwellings, one tree for every 70 feet of street frontage is required. 100% of the front yard and 25% of [he en[ire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance of C.O. 3nl • ti- Sq. ft. Existing Improvement(s): House: sq. ft. Shed: sq. ft. Detached Garage: Other: Street hees required: Street trees provided: na MAK i In for~nation BuildOn dOn ~ To Engineering • Consuftlng • Testing \ Melody Homes, Inc. Mazch 1, 2004 11031 Sheridan Boulevard Westminster, Colorado 80020 p/ Job No. 532-35120 Subject: Summary Report of the Geotechnical Evaluation for 5365 Newcombe Street, Lot 6, Block 3, Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3, Wheat Ridge, Colorado References: 1. "Geotechnical Engineering Report of Foundation Recommendations, Lots 1 through 12, Block 1; Lots 1 through 13, Block 2; and Lots 1 through 12, Block 3, Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3, Wheat Ridge, Colorado," by PSI, Job No. 532- 35120, Addendum i, dated Mazch 1, 2004 2. "A Guide to Swelling Soils for Colorado Homebuyers and Homeowners," by Noe, David C.; Jochim, Candace L.; and Rogers, William P.; Special Publication 43, Colorado Geological Survey, 1997 Dear Melody Homes, Inc., Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) has completed a geotechnical evaluation for a portion of the subject subdivision that includes the subject lot. T'his letter summarizes the data gathered and our recommendations contained in the referenced report for the subject residence. This summary is intended to provide information for the Homeowner and foundation engineering purposes. The above referenced Geotechnical Report (See Reference 1) should be utilized for construction or foundation engineering purposes. SITE EXPLORATION Site exploration consisted of drilling one boring neaz the anticipated center of the subject residence. The boring was advanced to a total depth of 21 feet below the existing ground surface. Samples of the subsurface soils were collected in the field and returned to our laboratory for subsequent analysis. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soils encountered in the boring drilled on the subject lot generally consisted of 21 feet of overburden soils consisting of fill, sandy to very sandy clay, and gravelly sand. Bedrock was not encountered below the existing grade at the time of drilling. Groundwater was not encountered below the grade existing at the boring location when checked at and/or subsequent to the time of drilling. EXPANSIVE SOILSBEDROCK As is common in the Denver Metro Area, some of the soils and bedrock present in this subdivision include expansive clays that will swell upon an increase in moisture content. Experience has shown that some increase in moisture content of the expansive clays beneath the proposed residence and sunounding improvements should be expected due to site development and associated landscape irrigation. Protessional Service Industries, Inc. • 4765 Indepentlence Street • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone 303/424-5578 • Fax 303/423-5625 Melody Homes, Inc. Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3 Lot 6, Block 3 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Job No.532-35120 March l, 2004 Page 2 of 5 Based upon the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, the use of grade beams and Type B- Narrow Spread Footings or Footing Pads are considered the most appropriate foundation system for the single family residence proposed on this lot. A grade beam and narrow spread footing or footing pad foundation system is utilized to concentrate the loads from the structure on the individual footings or footing pads, thereby opposing the effects of the swelling soil and/or bedrock. In addition, a void box or air space is constructed below the grade beams between the footings or footing pads to help concentrate the loads on the footings and isolate the bottom of the grade beams from the expansive soils and/or bedrock. FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SLABS Basement Floors. Basement floors in the Front Range area aze commonly constructed as either structurally supported floors with a void space beneath or as a slab-on-grade, depending on the swell potential of the subsurface profile. The determination of whether or not a slab-on-grade floor system is suitable for a particular site requires an assessment of whether slab movement is likely to occur, the potential amount of slab movement, and whether the potential movement will result in unacceptable performance. A slab performance risk evaluation as described in Exbibit A is typically used to provide such an assessment. Structurally supported floors should be used in all non-basement finished living areas in the proposed residence. Structurally supported floors aze also recommended in basement areas where the slab performance risk is categorized as high to very high. Slab-on-grade construction has been used successfully in the Front Range azea for basement floor support on lots where the slab performance risk is categorized as low to moderate. There is risk of slab heave and associated cracking for all slab-on-grade construction in expansive soil azeas as discussed in Exhibit A. First time as well as subsequent homeowners must be informed of this potential risk and homeowner responsibilities for maintenance of various items as discussed later. Slab performance risk associated with the soils and/or bedrock materials anticipated to influence the basement floor system on this lot have been judged to be in the low risk category. As a result, a slab-on-grade basement floor system is deemed suitable for use on this lot. Experience has shown that basement slab-on-grade performance has generally been satisfactory on sites where the slab performance risk is judged to be low to moderate. In the Front Range area, basement slabs with up to 3 inches of elevation differential and/or some minor cracking is wmmon and is generally considered "normal" on sites in the low to moderate risk category. While such movement and/or cracking may not be cosmetically desirable, they are generally not anticipated to adversely affect performance of the basement slab or foundation provided that all recommendations for slab-on-grade construction and homeowner maintenance described below are closely followed. This discussion assumes the basement is non-habitable. In light of the preceding information, if the homeowner elects to construct improvements in the basement, the improvements must at least be constructed in accordance with the "Slab-on-Grade Construction Details" presented below. Non-Basement Slabs. Garage floors, driveways, sidewalks, exterior porches and patios are normally constructed as slabs-on-grade and are usually incorporated into the construction of a typical residence. In areas where expansive soils are present, non-basement slabs are likely to undergo some heaving and cracking. Performance of these non-basement slab-on-grade elements in areas of expansive soils is variable and unpredictable. At the present time solutions using readily Melody Homes, Inc. Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3 Lot 6, Block 3 Job No. 532-35120 March I, 2004 Page 3 of 5 available construction technology considered to be within practical, cost effective limits aze not available to preclude movement of these slab-on-grade elements. Slab-on-Grade Construction Details. Cracking of slabs-on-grade is normal and should be expected. Cracking can occur not only as a result of heaving or compression of the supporting soil and/or bedrock material, but also as a result of concrete curing stresses. The homeowner should closely follow the precautions listed below for all slab-on-grade construction. These details will not reduce the amount of slab movement, but aze intended to reduce potential damage should heaving of the supporting subgrade take place. It should be noted that significant swelling of expansive soils can occur, even with a small increase in moisture content, and some increase in moisture content is inevitable as a result of development and associated landscaping. However, extreme moisture content increases can be largely controlled by proper and responsible homeowner maintenance and irrigation practices. 1. Slabs should be separated from all exterior walls, column posts, interior bearing members and utility lines to allow independent vertical movement of the slab (i.e., construct a"floating" slab). Plumbing and utilities that pass through the slab should be isolated from the slabs. It is recommended that flexible boots be used on all non-pressurized urility lines above the floor slab. 2. Heating, venrilating, and air conditioning systems supported by slabs should be provided with minimum 3-inch flexible connections between the plenum and the air ducts or piping. 3. A minimum 3-inch void space is recommended above, or below partirions that aze placed on the slab. In finished areas, all fumng strips, drywall and paneling should stop at least 3 inches from the top of the slab. The void space can be covered with a molding strip. Doorways and stairwells should also be designed for this movement. Recommended construction details for partitions, doorways and stairwells aze presented in Eachibit B. NOTE: Movement of slabs supported orz expansive soils/bedrock could exceed the partition void space recommended above. These void spaces are not interzded to anricipate total potential slab movement. They are intended to prevent immediate damage to the superstructure and serve as an indicator of sZab movement. They must be monitored and maintained by the homeowner for the life of the structure. 4. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be constructed in a manner such that movement of these siabs does not adversely affect or get transmitted to the residence foundation or supershucture. The Owner should seek the assistance of a professional geotechnical engineer when considering patio and /or porch improvements. 5. Isolation of gazage door tracks and door jambs from the garage slab should be maintained by the homeowner throughout the life of the structure. DRAIN SYSTEM An individual perimeter foundation drain system The drain should dischazge to a positive gravity outfall away from the residence or to a sump pit which would allow pump discharge. If a gravity discharge is utilized as the primary discharge mechanism, it is recommended that a sump pit also be constructed Melody Homes, Inc. Job No. 532-35120 Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3 March 1, 2004 Lot 6, Block 3 Page 4 of 5 as a backup system. If a sump pit is installed and water continuously accumulates in the sump, a pump should be installed by the homeowner to remove the water. The pump should dischazge into existing drainage swales outside the limits of the backfill, or another suitable gravity outfall. 1'he homeowner should periodically check the sump pit to verify that the pump is operating properly, and accumulated water is being removed. The purpose of the perimeter foundation drain system is to help remove water that may accumulate around the foundation, and ultimately keep water out of below grade areas. The foundation drain is not intended to prevent an increase in the moisture content of the soils or prevent moist conditions in crawl space areas or beneath slabs. CRAWL SPACE AREAS A ground cover moisture barrier and adequate ventilation is recommended in all crawl space areas to help control humidity in the crawl space and living areas above. The use of black heavy gauge polyethylene sheeting as a ground cover and attached to the foundation walls is recommended as the moisture barrier. A minimum overlap of three feet is recommended for unbonded polyethylene sheets. The crawl space ground cover should be kept free of organic material arid debris during and after construction. LANDSCAPING, SURFACE DRAINAGE, AND IRRIGATION Proper maintenance of the azeas surrounding the foundation can affect perforxnance of the structure. Our experience has shown that if the Homeowner properly maintains the items summarized below, wetting of the foundation soils can be reduced and thereby decrease the risk of future problems with the structure. 1. The backfill should have a positive slope away from the foundation walls on all sides. The grade can be reduced somewhat if pavements or slabs will cover backfill azeas. The minimum decline away from the house should not be less than 6 inches in the first 5 feet (i.e. 10 percent) with a minimum slope of 2 percent thereafter. If settlement of the backfill results in low areas, these areas should be filled and compacted with a fine-grained soil to establish the posirive slopes mentioned above. The addition of rock, bazk, or mulch in low azeas to establish positive slopes is not acceptable. 2. Downspouts should discharge into splash blocks that extend beyond the limits of the foundation wall backfill and a minimum of 5 feet from the foundation. Splash blocks should be sloped away from the foundation walls. The use of long downspout extensions instead of splash blocks is recommended. Downspout extensions should not be buried in such a manner that the outlet is obstructed in any way. If downspout extensions aze buried, they must be constructed of non-perforated pipe. We recommend that splash blocks, or any impervious material, be placed beneath sill cocks and extend at least 3 feet horizontally from the foundation wall. 3. Particulaz care should be taken during final landscaping of the site. If the Homeowner desires to plant next to or neaz foundation walls, or exterior slabs, it should be understood that the risk of future damage to the structure or slabs-on-grade is increased. It is advisable to plant only vegetation that requires very little irrigation or only natural precipitation for survival next to or near the foundation or exterior slabs. Melody Homes, Inc. Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3 Lot 6, Block 3 Job No.532-35120 March l, 2004 Page 5 of 5 4. Installation of decorative landscaped azeas such as gravel, bark, wood mulch, etc. is advocated as an alternative to planting next to foundarions and exterior slabs. These azeas should be underlain with polyethylene or geotextile fabria To reduce water infiltration, the slopes recommended above must be maintained. The edge of dewrative azeas should be constructed above the adjacent lawn or ground surface, and should not impede drainage with gass stops. Refer to Eachibit C for a recommended typical decorative installation. 5. Sprinkler system water lines should not be installed next to foundation walls. If a sprinkler system is installed, the sprinkler heads should be placed so that the spray from the heads does not fall within five feet of the foundation walls. Where practicable, main sprinkler lines, zone control boxes, and drains should be constructed at least 10 feet from the foundation walls. Lawn irrigation should be limited to only the amount necessary to maintain normal growth. Excessive watering must be avoided. 6. Swales and drainage routes established during site development and final grading on the subject lot must not be altered and must be maintained by the homeowner. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION The recommendations that are summarized herein were made prior to start of construction of the subject residence. It is possible that subsurface conditions may be encountered at the time of construction that are different from those anticipated at the time of this writing. If significantly different subsurface conditions are encountered at the time of construction, the type of foundation and/or basement floor system to be constructed may change. If foundation or floor system recommendations change, the Builder should notify you of the change. SUMMARY This letter is only a sununary of our findings and recommendations for the subject lot, and is intended for the potential customer who is considering purchase of the home from the Builder. Should the home be sold in the future, the seller should pass this letter on to any subsequent purchasers. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Ryan I,epro Staff Engineer Attaclunents: Exhibit A- Slab Performance Risk Evaluation Exhibit B- Recommended Construction Details for Partitions, Doorways, and Stairwells Exhibit C- Recommended Landscaping Details EXHIBIT A SLAB PERFORMANCE RISK EVALUATION The soils and bedrock in Colorado include expansive clays and claystone bedrock that will swell upon an increase in moisture content. These expansive materials occur at or neaz the ground surface throughout most of the Denver metropolitan azea. There are risks associated with construction on, and living in areas of expansive soils that cannot be completely eliminated by either engineering or construction techniques. While the risk of damage cannot be eliminated, the home building industry has developed effective methods to mitigate damage. The determination as to whether slab-on-grade construcrion can or should be used for a particular application requires an evaluation of the likelihood or risk that slab-on-grade movement will occur, and if movement does occur, whether the potential movement will result in unacceptable slab performance. What constitutes unacceptable slab performance is subjective, and includes consideration of the axnount of total slab movement, differential slab movement, and cracking that occurs as a resuit of differential slab movement. The performance of a slab-on-grade depends upon the interac6on of many factors, many of which cannot be accurately known or predicted. These factors include details of the slab construction as well as the behavior of the soil and /or bedrock material that underlie the slab. Behavior of the soil and/or bedrock materials below a slab is a function of numerous factors including geologic structure, the local and regional soil and bedrock profile and iYs variability, material types below the slab, engineering properties of materials below the slab, existing stress state, density and moisture content of materials below the slab, swell and/or suction potential of the soil and bedrock material below the slab and nearby, depth and magnitude of future moisture increase, existing and future ground water conditions, presence and location of neazby surface water sources, type and configuration of basement, tolerable movement for intended use, performance history and experience in the area, surface topography, previous and future grading, surface and subsurface drainage, site landscaping irrigation and vegetation. Assessment of future slab-on-grade performance involves consideration of all the above factors. Due to the complex interaction of all these factors, such an assessment is necessarily subjective, and requires considerable experience and judgment on the part of the geotectuiical engineer. Such an assessment is referred to as a"slab performance risk evaluation" (SPRE). Slab performance risk evaluation is an engineering judgment that is used as a predictor of the general magnitude of potential slab-on-grade heave, and the risk of poor slab-on-grade performance. Aithough the results of laboratory sweil tesring to determine the measured swell percentage or swell potential of individuai samples of a soil or bedrock material is an important consideration in this process and one that has been used extensively for more than 30 years in the Denver metro area, the results of swell testing performed on a given lot or subdivision alone are only an indicator of how an expansive soil may behave, and used alone are not sufficient to effectively assess future slab-on- grade performance. Unfortunately a large percentage of people tend to focus solely on the results of laboratory testing when evaluating the risk of expansive soils in their home buying decisions. Professional Service lndustries. inc. PaQe 1 of 3 March l, 2004 In an effort to provide some uniformity in terminology and provide a relative correlation of slab performance risk to the results of swell tests (i.e. measured swell), the Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers (CAGE) developed the concept of slab performance risk categories as part of a 1996 document titled "Guideline for Slab Performance Risk Evaluarion and Residential Basement Floor System Recommendations". The risk categories developed by CAGE aze reproduced below: TABLEII RECOMMENDED REPRESENTATIVE SWELL POTENTIAL DESCRIPTIONS AND CORRESPONDING SLAB PERFORMANCE RISK CATEGORIES Slab Performance Risk Cate o Representative* Percent Swell (500 sf Surchaz e Representa6ve* Percent Swell 1000 sf Surchaz e Low 0 to<3 0 to<2 Moderate 3 to < 5 2 to < 4 Hi Sto<g 4to<6 Ve Hi h >8 >6 *NOTE: The representative percent swell values presented in the above table are not necessarily measured values; rather, they are a judgment of the overall swell of the soil and bedrock profile likely to influence slab performance. Representative swell can be thought of as the range of swell percentage which, in the opinion of the engineer, best represents the swelling characteristics of the soils and bedrock within the anticipated zone of moisture content increase (often referred to as the depth of wetting) below foundation excavation depths when considering a11 of the above factors. A current design assumption for the zone of material subject to an increase in moisture content below basement slabs-on-gade is approximately 7 to 10 feet. In unusual circumstances, wetting can exceed these depths. The engineer should evaluate potential wetting depths based upon geologic conditions and the site specific soil profile. Movement of foundations and concrete flat work constructed in areas with expansive soils will occur over time regardless of the performance risk category judged to be representative of a given site or azea. However, the anticipated severity and frequency of damage has generally been observed to increase with increasing slab performance risk category. Few detailed studies correlating perceived slab performance risk with actual performance data have been performed to date in the Denver metro area for numerous reasons, including insufficient and inaccessible repair and maintenance records as well as inability to survey the condition of existing occupied homes. However, the results of studies that have been performed recently in the Denver metro area have validated this observation: Criteria used in the study to evaluate slab performance included a mascixnum crack height of'/< inch, a masimum crack width of'/a inch, and a maxunum differential elevafion across the slab of 3 inches. The percent of homes surveyed that exceeded any one of the three criteria is shown below: Professional Seivice Industries. Inc. Pa~e 2 of 3 March 1, 2004 Basement Floor Slab Performance a~ = 60 ~ •L 50 x -r- 40 W 0 y ~ 30 d d ul w. 20 ~ ° Q 10 x o N 0 Miil ~ = Low Moderate High Very High Slab Performance Risk Category Struchually supported floors, also lmown as structural floors, aze generally considered the most effective way to reduce the likelihood of basement floor movement due to soil heave. There aze other design issues associated with structural floors, such as ventilation and increased lateral loads, air quality, energy efficiency, maintenance, etc. which must be considered. Structural floors do not constitute a perfect option and in many cases are not the best option. Based upon the combined experience of iYs members, CAGE advocates the use of structurally supported basement floors on sites where the slab performance risk is categorized as high or very high. Some homebuilders subscribe to this methodology and their standard practice is to use slab-on-grade basement floors on sites where the slab-on-grade performance category is judged by their geotechnical consultant to be low or moderate. In the case where the homebuilder does not provide the buyer with an option to select the type of basement floor to be constructed, and/or the buyer does not feel comfortable with, or understand the floor recommendations and associated risk as explained herein, PSI recommends that the homebuyer retain the services of a quatified geotechnical engineer experienced with residential construction in the Denver metro azea to assist in reviewing the available geotechnical information and associated recommendations. PSI also recommends use of structurally supported basement floors for lots where the slab performance risk is judged to be high or very high. On low and moderate swell potential sites, differential slab heave of up to 3 inches is considered normal. In unusual instances, the normal movement can be exceeded. In construction of residential structures, the risks associated with swelling soils and bedrock can be mitigated, but not eliminated, by cazeful design and construction procedures. The home building industry has developed design and construction methods which have reduced frequency of slab-on- grade and foundation distress over the past 10 years. Homeowners must accept that slab-on-grade construction and, in some instances, foundations may be affected by swelling soils. At the present time, heaving of concrete flat work such as driveways, patios, garage floors, etc. catuiot be precluded using readily available construction technology within practical, cost effective limits. Professional Service lndustries. Inc. Pa?e 3 of: March 1, 2004 ~ Spike as required Partition I 1 for stability ~ ~ Molding, nail ~ at bottom onlv \ ~ ~ voia space Drilled hole ~ Concrete slab i-i i i-i i-i i 111=~~~~,~~-~~~_ Wood 2 x 4, nail to slab Information VOID SPACE DETAIL FOR LI~"'~ ToBuild On PARTITIONS ON SLABS Engineering.consunrng.re5nns EXHIBIT B Brick or siding Minimum Rock or Dark area with downspout extended beyond edging , Sod Perforeted edging or equivalent to allow release of water from rock or bark area Maintain minimum slope of IOR awey from foundation Minimum 8 Mil x Polyethylene or Geotextile Fabric sloped away trom foundation under edging to top oP grass • Frame wau Foundation Wall P LO T P LA N FOR MELODY HOMES INC. LOT 6 , BLOCK 3, SKYLINE ESTATES, FILING 3 , CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON , STATE OF COLORADO. ADDRESS 5365 NEWCOMBE STREET .00" 51•40 NO0° 1 3" 1 1 U.E. ~ ~ ~SETBACK - ~ I C~I - I ~ I I ~ I f. ~ I I sTOOar, ~ iz.s- I oI I w oI -nF =s~.9 2624 U-) ~ BSMT ~ ~ 47.3 I ~ I 8. 10' U.E. ~ LOT 6 ' 7, 920 sf. I I i CRAWL i J 10.8' I ~ 3 CAR RiGF}T Ni GARAGE w I 0.4' 17.8' v i 5~ j --1 ^ o.. ~ PORCIi_ DRIVEWAY I I o Oo v ~ N p o ~ T-- 10' U.E. + CFOTSI ~ a a I~ \ I~4' w I~, ~.o' 4 ~ ~ ~ 8. ~ 0 a ~ w II ~ 48.0 ~ ~ N ^ ~ II 8.0' o I,~ I~ol~ ~iMoil L iE I D 46.341 NOa° 1 3'1 1"W 66.UU 47.001 N SrkEcr GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS PLOT PLAN DOES NOT SHOW LOCATION OF VANDOW WELLS. FOR R1EIR LOCATION SEE STftUCNRAL ENGINEERED PLANS. 2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN NRWND THE PERIMEiER OF THE STRUC7URE ARE TO THE E%TERIOR FOUNDAiION CORNERS. 3. PRONDE ANO MAINTAIN POSIIIVE DRAINACE AWRY FROM ALL FOUNDATION WALLS PER WARRANTY REOUIREMENTS. (O.Sk MINIMUM SIOPE FOR CONCREiE PANS.) THIS PLOT PIAN SHOWS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENiS ONLY. FINAL CONSiRUCTION MAY VARY. 5. FOR OUESTONS REGAROING THE FOUNDATON DURING E%ChVA➢ON, FORM SEi11NG, AND HOUSE CONSMUCPON REFER TO iHE ENGINEERED FOVNDATON PLANS. ° HOUSE AT MINIMUM SETBACK oz CHECK FORMS BEFORE POURING w 48 HOUR N071CE REQUIRED ~ Z ° 2' STAGGER REQUIRED z~ ° 35% LOT COVERAGE FOR 2-STORY/ TRI-LVL 409: LOT COVERAGE FOR RANCHES @)MELODY HOMESINC. CACENTERIOF COLORA OON 71031 SHERlDAN BLVD. 1-800-922-1987 Op 534-6700 'oerrv e iYESTNINSTER C0. 80020 ~ MIMI'MOIS dn wmw~ PHONE: (309) 466-1831 nr„mm~a FAX: (303) 466-2368 1O1° INFO STAKE: MODEL 2624 RH 3 CAR ELEV. A LOT AREA (S.F.) = 7,920 HOUSE AREA (S.F.) = 2294.03 COVERAGE= 29.0% BLOG. HEIGHT= 28.25' AVG. BLOG. HEIGHT= 23.25' AVG. f.G.= sp. Z REVIE7D & APPROVED FOR STAKING LEGEND: ~ NE WATER SERVICE R-P❑ROPI ERTYLESTALS ❑ Q SANITARY SEWER SERVICE BOW=BRONTOOFWWALK LIGHT POLE FL=fLOW LINEg °~FIRE HYDRANT EASEMENT MINIMUM SETBACKS: SCnLE: 1"=20' FRONT: 20.0' DATE:04-19-04 SIDE: 7.5'REAR: REV: STREET SIDE:20.0' gy; BMA MINIMUM JOB N0: SKY3 BETWEEN STRUCTURES:15' ,1( !9 T aJ 4! 1 !f f f? 2 4 i, 10 6 ~ ~n®~n 10'-6" 7'-2,• 2> VARIES PER PORCH 8" 6X6 WELDED WIRE SHOP PRIMED 4" CONCRETE SLAB FABRIC. 5,-Z„ 5,- W8X13 ON GROUND. BREAKOUT STEEL O P T I O A L iU t as ,.a?~ _ _ STO P o \W ~ ~3~-6~~ X ~-6 TOP AND BOT. ~ coNr. ReiNF. CONCRETE HA NCH ~ TOP OF HAUNCH TO - ~ AT OPT. STOP ONLY BE 8° BELOW TOP : OF WALL. 2-~4 X 5'-0" t TURN SLAB EDGE o DOWN TO HAUNCH BRACE WALLS ~ - i _ - AS REQUIRED. BEFORE BACKFIWNG. ~ O o ~ ~ R o r-- - z 1 w((~~'''~~ ~./~,.T - a 2-#4 (SIZE VARIES ~ PER PORCH) `D ,r Y ANGLE EXPANSION JOINT. i w " L~ W SEE SECTION 1 NOTCH FDN. 8" MAX. FOR FoR ~Erni~s. DOOR & MAINTAIN 24" MI(~. ~ BTWN. ROWS OF REINF. ~i (AT OPT. DOOR ONLY.) POLYETHYLENE I ~ 00 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ SEE SECTION 1 ~ I VOID BEYOND, SEE SEE FOR DETAILS. PLAN FOR LOCATION. PLAN BEAR ON UNDISTURBED ~ ~ ~ j y j f 7 HAUNCH AT END OF PORCH. ~ if 0 o I ( ~ 6" FTG-TYPICAL t~ j o~w~, cra c~ cn a ~ ~ r UNLESS NOTED N I c~ f 4 a r 1 rt ~ - ~ VARIES PER PORCH 8~ 6X6 WELDED WIRE ~UJ~........ 11 7 FABRIC. 4" CONCRETE SLAB cV •r~f ~1_ t t. SHOP PRIMED ON GROUND. BREAKOUT STEEL ~ W8X13 ~ ~ / 00 N Q _ _ ~ ~ O TOP AND BOT. N ~ CONT. REINF. ~ l i ~ BLOCKOUT ~ I T HAUNCH FOR TOP OF HAUNCH TO ~ ~ BEAM. BE FLUSH WITH TOP ~ =,.i~ OF WALL tO 2-~4 X 5'-0° ~ 0 i I I f BRACE WALLS a0 BEFORE 00 BACKFILLING. ~ M M 1 0 3-2X4 POST i . 4 2-~/4 (SIZE VARIES wl 4! I w Ti ~ 0 FTG ~ PER PORCH) G A R A z ~ d~~ ~ ~ 4 CONC. SLA 0 ~ ANGLE EXPANSION C~ ~ i JOINT. ~ SEE SECTION 1 i ~ - - - = = = _ = mar= _ _ FOR DETAILS. t INDICATES PLACEMENT s POLYETHIIENE i ~ MATERIAL UNDER GRA ~ SEAL VOID WITH POLY. 4 z o0 INDICATES 2X PLATE L SEE SECTION 1 ~ I z~- - VOID BEYOND, SEE SEE FOR DETAILS. ~ ~ PROVIDE 1 /2~~45 X 1 O~~ PLAN FOR LOCATION. PLAN BEAR ON UNDISTURBED ~ ~ BOLTS ~ 4~-O~~ O.C. E soi~. MIN. 7" INTO CONCRET 1 ~ I V ~ ~ 3/8~~ = 1'-0~~ MIN. 2 BOLTS PER SIL HAUNCH AT MIDDLE OF PORCH. PIECE W~~ BOLT LOCA L r z~- 12" OF EACH END OF SILL PLATE PIECE. TYP NOTCH FDN. 12" MAX. c r DOOR & MAINTAIN 16" I BTWN. ROWS OF REINF. g i'f ' 2 ~ - J ti.- N i A f y D } I L i. r d' 4'-0' MOVE ANCHOR BOLTS AND '-6 1/2' 4 71 PLATE TO OUTSIDE FACE i. r { i OF WALL TO OMIT BRICK RETURN. ELEVS. B & C ONLY. f~, _ I - t '_r a ~NI~~M GA l t i~ 1. SEE PLAN AT RIGHT FOR COMPLETE F 16'-2 1 /2" 10'-7 1 /2" 1. L. ~ {t 1 I ~t 4>, 1' J ~ ' dr ty STEP BOT. OF INDICATES PLACEMENT OF VOID FDN. 4'-0"t. MATERIAL UNDER GRADE BEAM. SEAL VOID WITH POLY. TYPICAL. BASEMENT 16'~ FTG-TYPICAL } t i r_ Q UNLESS NOTED 'Ti•s4 L ~ o -J [2 i l~ I i at ~ STEP TOP 0 n i FDN. 8" t- T IS STEP TOP F ~ ~ S EET FDN. 8" p ~ C H ~ 1 c~~ 1 W `a. t - - - - - o - - - - - I y -N ~l N 1--~-_ _3 l ~L Ja Tom. 3'-4" 4'-8" 4'- 2'-9" 2'-9 1 2' '-2 1 /2 ~ 4'-1•• 3,_8,• J .~..i_- ii II {L ~ 1 O~ rl 1 '1 n ~ n ~ /n» ro 1 F 114 L LB. FELT WHERE THEY PASS THRU SLAB. TO SOLID BEARING (OR CONCRETE HAUNCH 213-4" 28'-21) 1 4. GROUT BEAM POCKETS SOLID AFTER BEAM IS SET. WHERE SHOWN). PROVIDE #4 DOWELS @ 24 SET. FROM WALLS TO SLAB. SLOPE SLAB AWAY 5. PROMDE REINFORCING AROUND DEEP BASEMENT WIND( IT WINDOWS AS SHOWN FROM BUILDING. s I ON DETAIL 2. FIORCH AT ELEVATIONS E3 C 1/411 11~011 OF 2 1. SEE PLAN AT RIGHT FOR COMPLETE FOUNDATION 2500/1000 OR 3000.5/1000 2X PLATE ON TOP OF BEAM. DOUBLE 2X PLATE ' SEE DETAIL AT RIGHT FOR PLATE ~ ar 8 AND BEAM POCKET PLACEMENT _tl" kll~i 8,~ WITH DOUBLE PLATE. FOUNDATION s 2-#4 TOP & BOT. WALL. i CONTINUOUS. BEAM POCKET. _ - - - =11~ DOUBLE PLATE AND STEEL BEAM, SEE CREAM POCKET CONSTRUCTI PLAN. PLACE TOP BRACE WALLS BEFORE OF STEEL BEAM 4'-0" BACKFILLING. FLUSN WITH TOP OF LOWER PLATE. 2'-0" MAX. 2'-0" MIN . f J 1~ . 2-#4 CONTI SEPLN 4"C 0 WHER j ANGLE EXPANSION JOINT. M i i~ I 4" CONC. SLAB ON UNDISTURBED i ~ SOIL OR COMPACTED FILL. - - Z SCORE JOINTS IN SLAB AT - ~ MAX. 200 SQ. FT. AREAS. ~ ~ ~-I I I~ ~ ~ ~ #4 X = o W ~ 2'- f { °D ~ ROUG o z ~ 4" VO - g ~ PLAN ° ~ GRAD ~ ~ ~ ( I_T M ~ ~ ~ CRAW i i 1. } ■ ~ PROVIDE #4 X 1'-6" DOWELS -m T ~ 2'-0" O.C. MAX. (MIN. 2 '-III- 4" VOID BEYOND, SEE DOWELS PER PAD) POLY. SEE BEAR . PLAN FOR LOCATION. SEE BEAR ON NATIVE SOILS PLAN OR S PLAN OR STRUCTURAL FILL. SEE S SEE SOIL REPORT. j` f T' L 1 REFER TO SOILS ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM, IF REQUIRED. Y L- f 1 I S u 1 ~ CONTINUOUS. ~v ~S EMBED 2X8 OR 2X10 CONTINUOUS BEAM POCKET - - LEDGER W/2 ROWS OF 20d FORMING i 2-#4 FULL HEIGHT ~ ~ H T c~ r, - - - NAILS ~ 12" O.C. (1 TOP & 1 BOT.) ~ I I, FLOOR FRAMIN N -'II-III 1/2' SIMPSON U210 HANGER OF FDN. WALL. BEND 1'-6" OVER PLYWOOD SUR ~ 3/4" T & G SUBFLOOR tl. TOP OF WIND01`r'. LAG SCREWS AS x f REQUIRED FOR STABILITY. w t ft DRILLED HOLE r ~ ~ ~ `V FLUSH GLU-LA N 2X10 FLOOR JOIST, 1 t z 2-#4 UNDER SEE PLAN MOULDING. NAIL ~ 2'-0" 2'-p" WINDOW AS - - GRADE AT AIR 1~ GRADE AT AIR SPACE POLY. SEE SEE SECTION 1 SEE SEE SECTION 1 1 4" VOID BEYOND, SEE FOR DETAILS. POSY. PLAN PLAN FOR LOCATION. BEAR ON NATIVE SOILS 4° VOID BEYOND, SEE PLAN BEAR ON NATI OR STRUCTURAL FILL. PLAN FOR LOCATION. OR STRUCTURA SEE SOIL REPORT. SEE SOIL REP0 j~~~~oN ~ 1/2" = 1'-O" S~CTON / 1/2" = 1'- BEAM TO WALL C0~INECTION I ~ 1 ,.t . r { GARAGE OR CRAWL SP TOP ROW OF REINFORCING. a- MAKE TOP BARS CONTINUOUS WITH TOP BARS IN BASEMENT L~ 2'-6" MIN. WALL. STOOP SLAB. f FDN. 4 WALL J z ° - - BOTTOM ROW OF i L REINF. EXTEND INTO BASEMENT WALL 0 J `V HAUNCH 1 G INDICATES PLACEMENT OF VOID S MATERIAL UNDER GRADE BEAM. S ~ _ SEAL VOID WITH POLYETHYLENE. u 0 2-#4 X 2'-10" BOTTOM STEP IN FOUNDATION. o Y I i ~6•. - it ~ ~ F t (1 EACH FACE) u n t o ~ u ~ n~ ~ TYPICAL. ~OUNI~ . t !Q M, i i th-~ k~.) i v \11. i i L/ " i r-1 I L.... 1/21 = 11-0" AT BOTTOM STE b. H 5uU5 tNUINttK SHOULD BE CALLED TO INSPECT FOUNDATION EXCAVATION T€ON TO VERIFY FOUNDATION TYPE BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION. ALTERNATE BOLT ON HAUNCH BY OTHERS. CRAWL SPACE 8 STEP BETWEEN GARAGE OR iiP('J' f\l (~~nF-T O T.J. ,~l. ~2 E & BASEMENT WALL 1/411 = 11-011 WALL REINFORC OF 2 DIMENSIONS IN PARENTHESES ARE CO ARE COMMON STEPS. y ~ m N 7 W n -l'o ~ ~ ~m W Q IW 0 7 N S N < fD Q m m =3 v a m 0 w 0 ~ m ] 3 N 'O ~ 0 ~ d C- 0 v D O. a m N N 0 0 ~ 7 7 ♦ / ~ C: 0 n Z (D O ~ n o ' v rt ~cn m O' w (D , ~ < m ~ , • ~ 0 r O Z ~ ~y ~ ~ ~ m n ~ ~j -Z-I (D o v ~ m ~ ~ E! ru Q'M rf-u- \ o a ~~T Code Consultants International, Inc. j 10390 Bradford Road, Suite 215 Littletoq CO 80236 ° Phone:303.973.7766 Fax:303.973.8015 www. code-consultants. com INSPECTION REPORT Jurisdiction: W Nc e ta'C fL 1D ,rE Request Date: -1 - i O-a cA Permit Requested By: M t ICEs Job Name: If~'~ n c1 Contact Phone: Job Address: .5 a3 fe 5"' wew c.o r^ Q E Inspection For: Q C~ 5 F A es.. t"-a ~ Q.1Y' ' <F n.v ~ « rs,tea~ Ci I HAVE THIS DAY INSPECTED "1T-ffi WORK LLSTED ABOVE AND HAVE RECORDED ANY CODE DISCREPANCIES I HAVE DISCOVERED. ALL LISTED CODE DISCREPANCIES MUST BE CORRECTED, REINSPECTED & APPROVED BY AN AUTHORI7,ED INSPECTOR BEFORE TI-IE WORK LS COVERED UP. PURSUAN"I TO UBC SECTION 108.1 AND IBC SECTION 109.1, APPROVAL AS A RESULT OF AN INSPECTION SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE AN APPROVAL OF A VIOLATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE OR OF OTf-lER ORDINANCES OF TI-IE JURISDICTION. INSPECTOR'S SIGNAT[JRE Approved? Ye No Partially Approved? Yes Describe Area: Cl " ) DATE Time of Inspection: _ V Pj' _ am / Pm Miles: Z ~ ; Infonnation r~~ aToBuildOn Engineering • Consulting • TesNn9 June15,2004 DR Horton - Melody Series 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westrninster, Colorado 80020 Date of Observation: June 4, 2004 Project No. 532-00350-849-2 Subject: Fooring Observation for a Structure at 5365 Newcombe Street, Lot 6, Block 3, Skyline Estates Subdivision, Filing No. 3, Wheat Ridge, Colorado References: 1. Geotechnical Engineering Report by PSI, Project No. 532-35120, Addendum 1, dated Mazch 1, 2004 2. Foundation Recommendarion Letter by PSI, Project No. 53240350-849-1 3. Foundation Design for the Subject Site by Cobb Associates, Job No. 8303080, Model No. 2624 An observation was made of the footing forms, prior to piacement of concrete, at the subject site on the referenced date. The soils exposed in the excavation were capable of supporting design presswes as recommended in the above referenced documents. The soils exposed in the excavation and the type of foundation under construction are consistent with the recommendations presented in the above referenced documenu. The footing excavations were clean and dry at the time of the observation. Please call if fiuther consultation or observations aze required. Professional Service Industries, Inc. I io Xieer~ . Project Manager Reviewed by: Leslie A. Jansen, P.E. Senior Project Manager .rxnisej 71 zloy 34330 l Professional Service Industries, Inc. • 4765 Intlependence Street • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone 303/424-5578 • Fax 3031423-5625 r Infonnation ToBuildOn Eng/neering • Consuldng • Testlng June 16, 2004 DR Horton - Melody Series 11031 Sheridan Boulevazd Westrninster, Colorado 80020 Date of Observation: 7une 8, 2004 Project No. 53240350-849-3 Subject: Observation of Reinforcing Stcel for a Structure at 5365 Newcombe Street, Lot 6, Block 3, Skyline Eststes Subdivision, Filing No. 3, Wheat Ridge, Colorado Reference: Foundation Plans for the Subject Site by Cobb Associates, Job No. 8303080, Model No. 2624 M observation was made of the placement and siu of the reinforcing steel in the foundarion walls of the subject shvcture. The observation showed that the grade and spacing of reinforcing steel were in general compliance with the above referenced foundation plans. The electric ground rebaz has been placed in the foundation according to the National Electric Code, Section 250-500. Professional Service Industries, Inc. kpo ect Manager JRD/sej Reviewed by: Leslie A. Jansen, P.E. Senior Project Manager ;"~E A ~~zloy 34330 Protessional Service Indusiries, Inc. • 4765 Independence Street • Wheat Ritlge, CO 80033 • Phone 303/424-5578 • Fax 303/423-5625 Infor~nation rj1;.0XZ ~ i ToBuildOn Engineering • Consulting • Testing June 18,2004 DR Horton - Melody Series 11031 Sheridan Boulevazd Westminster, Colorado 80020 Date of Observation; June 15 and 16, 2004 'Project No. 53240350-8494 Subject: Observarion of Drain System for a Struchue at 5365 Newcombe Street, Lot 6, Block 3, Skyline Estates Subdivision, Filing No. 3, Wheat Ridge, Colorado Two observa6ons were made of the drain system at the subject struchue. The drain system materials observed were found to be in general accordance with our recommendations. Random measurements taken from the top of the foundarion walls to the top of the drain pipe indicate that a positive slope was maintained to the outfall. A visual observation showed that damp proofmg has been applied to the enterior walls of the foundation. Please call if we may be of further service. Professional Service Industries, Inc. J ject Manager JRD/sej Reviewed by: Leslie A. Jansen, P.E. Senior Project Manager Professional Service Industries, Inc. • 4765 Intlepentlence Stree[ • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone 303/424-5578 • Fax 303/423-5625