Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4753 Dover StreetCERTIFICATE 0-i"666 L7PA City' of Wheat ~2"clg 5tipuiations~, interior,"Remode3~ This certificate verifies that '4 3Y~~ issued:, 04/22/09 Roof ($090346) 2663 ICC/70Q2`NEC 'and a new Cetrf3ate; of Occpanc" ]9%? U$~/"2002-,DTEC ;'fbm the City"'of Wheat "Ridge., _ , _ s nk`l',er System ie lding TAgpec,tor , Zoh ng Ad[na nistr r R Fi&T`E MUST Bfi :POSTED<BIx FRQNT 'DOOR OF , COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCIF$ 04/22/09 15:2$:42 City of Wheat Ridge Page 1 bp701-1s PERMIT INFORMATION - 080150 mmackey PERMIT INFORMATION: Permit#: 080150 Address: 4753 DOVER ST Permit Type: Residential Remodel Parcel Cd: 39-221-04-005 Permit Dt: 02/19/2008 OWNER: Expires: 01/30/2009 Address: PO Box 1268 City/St/Zip: Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 , LAND PARCEL INFORMATION: Zone Cd: Unassigned DU: 1 SetBacks-Front: 0.0 Funct Use: Residential Last Zone DL Left: 0.0 Subdivision: CLEARVALE Annex Dt: Right: 0.0 Cont Type: Miscellaneous Lot: Block No: 0 Back: 0.0 Legal:. JOB DESCRIPTION: Interior remodel, addi tion of bathroom, new roof. FEES QTY DUE PAID: Permit Fee 94,000.00 1,237.35 1,173.65 Plan Review Fee .00 804.28 762.87 Total Valuation 94,000.00 .00 .00 Use Tax 94,000.00 - 1,692.00 1,561.50 3,733.63 - 3,498.02 CONTACTS: owner Wheat Ridge 2020 PO Box 1268 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 7202759479. go CL1 ORION DEVELOPMENT, LLC STEVE BLAKESLEY 7887 E. BELLEVIEW AVENUE ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 4843577281 sub CIA JHS Electric John Sturken 498 E. 134th Ave Thornton, CO 80241 7200629666 sub CIS Blue Sky Plumbing Dustin 4765 Independence Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 3034212161 PARCEL INFORMATION: 10 Structure Type RAND 20 Year Built 1956 30 Property Type RESID PERMIT CONDITIONS: JS: APPROVED WITH ATTACHED RED LINE AND REVIEW NOTES SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS/APPROVAL APPROVALS: REQUIRED INSPECTIONS STATUS: PERMIT NOTES: 08/22/08 JS - Extension approved for 45 day extension 08/21/08 Kim dropped off extension letter . 08/18/08 JS - Give refund of $235.61 for mu ltiple per mits pulled 02/19/08 CREATED FROM APPL# 08-0041 02/15/08 JS: Approved with attached review notes and red-l ines on plans INSPECTION INFORMATION: # TYPE CONTR# CALLED CNCL WHO REO DT INS DT STATUS 1 fri: Framing Rough Insp. 07-0217 03/24/08 no KC 03/25/08 03/25/08 PARTIAL 2 dws: Drywall screw/nail 04/04/08 no kc 04/07/08 04/07/06 COMPLETE 3 mid: Midroof Insp. 07-0217 04/23/08 no kc 04/24/08 04/24/08 INCOMPLETE 4 mis: Mesh/stucco/lath 07-0217 08/01/08 no kc 08/04/08 08/05/08 COMPLETE 04/22/09 15:25:43 City of Wheat Ridge Page bp701-1s PERMIT INFORMATION - 080150 mmackey 5 pxi: Plumbing Rough Insp. 01-7835 08/01/08 no kc 08/04/08 08/04/08 INCOMPLETE 6 mis: Mesh/stucco/lath 07-0217 08/04/08 no kc 08/05/08 08/04/08 INCOMPLETE 7 pxi: Plumbing Rough Insp. 01-7835 08/05/08 yes kc 08/06/08 08/05/08 COMPLETE 8 cou: Courtesy 01/30/09 no kc 01/30/09 01/30/09 COMPLETE ♦ i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: l eMI--7 Job Address: iaS3 ,V e sr Permit Number: f Dp~nv r) P: f ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re-Inspection required: Yes Co When corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: 0 Inspectorr_ Q DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE ♦ i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division r (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: ~irfl AMA" Job Address: V753 VvV,52 X77 Permit Number: 09'O.7;_1 S.10AF 7 ~Sr T,--.,) /4j ❑ No one available for inspection: Time/ ;25 AM/PM Re-Inspection required: es No When corrections have been made, calf for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: `ll.~17 Inspector:✓~p I DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE p4~H?q~ City Of Wheat Ridge Building Division 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855 " Fax: 303-235-2857 eotoRnp° Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Building Permit Application 7S- 3 ~ey~r Sf Date: Plan A Perms, oW o54] Property Owner (please prino: k//i,,/ le,` E ZO Z(-) Phone: Mailing Address: (if different than property address) Address: City, State, Zip: Contractor: Contractor License Q Z 14- Z3 Phone: Sub ContracYOes; Electrical City License Plumbing City License Mechanical City License Company: Company Company: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Approval: Approval: Approval: Use of space (description): S•'n zip ~4 - Construction Value: Z S O . c o ee _ ro oc (as calculated per the Building Valuadon Data sheet) DescrtpGon~of work;. oAll~ JAk I^f~rs~ Plan Review(duestttmeofsobmlMaq:$ ,~o~Fe/f ~ T.fWrko C~rr,~fu9~~0y~ ~~''^y'~P£ Sq. Ft./L.Ftadded: Squares l7 BTU's Gallons Amps OWNERICONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Meat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to held inspection. CiRLCE ONE:: (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) or PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of WNEM CONTRATOR) PRINT NAME: C _ h ~Ck c54 t,41 0,-- SIGNATURE: 4 ~.r Date: P - FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT:: 0 approved w/ comments ❑ disapproved no review required _.I Bldg Valuation: $ 1 City of ~ Wheatlidge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291n Ave. February 2, 2009 Denise Balkas, AICP Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 Interim Co-Director Director of Real Estate Development Wheat Ridge 2020 4350 Wadsworth Blvd, Ste 420 PO Box 1268 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 Ms. Balkas, A midroof inspection was performed at 4753 Dover Street at the request of Orion Development on April 24, 2008 by Combination Inspector Kirk Cadotte. The inspection failed, with deficiencies noted in the nailing of the starter course and over-penetrating nails in the shingles. It was noted that re-inspection was required, but work was allowed to continue based on correction and re-inspection of the deficiencies. That required re-inspection was not requested, nor were the deficiencies corrected. The work that continued after the midroof inspection has been found to contain the same deficiencies noted during that inspection. On January 30' 2009, a re-inspection of the roof was conducted, with WR2020 representative Tom Brace present. The existence of the deficiencies was verified to Mr. Brace. In its' current state, the roof covering is not compliant with adopted building codes or manufacturers' installation guidelines and cannot be approved by the Building Division. Additionally, because of the lapse in time between the midroof inspection and the inspection with Mr. Brace, it is believed that correction of the deficiencies in the existing coverings cannot be accomplished without damage to the roof covering and underlayment, thus voiding any stated or implied warranty from the manufacturer. Manufacturer's certification of warranty will be required if the existing covering is to be corrected. Please advise me of your intention concerning correction of the noted deficiencies when determined by your office. A certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued without rectification of this issue. Thank you. Sincerely, her, Jr., CBO hn VildieguMflacical Chief B 7500 Wvenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2853 Fax: 303-234-2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us e City of WheatRi ge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT www.ei.wheatridge.co.us 4' CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ~ Building Inspection Division r(303) (303) 234-5933 Inspection line 235-2855 Office - (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: gsryN Azw&' Job Address/Permit Number: lv7 S3 P®L"g"' og'>"f7 e~ .e✓,S~r/~ ./'~tiA~'rrrst/~b 5p~~°°~ Fe;i ~i~r..~,~~y, r, k k , ❑ No one available for inspection: Time i'%Yo AM/PM Re-Inspection required: 0 €c When corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: O I//'4 ' Inspecto t~ DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE A 7.b,/ g r 7t~ I3s-~ s2 ,w , y " A~;ef F Jss v., <r 4- ~ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office ' (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: tae X00W Job Address/Permit Number: VlP 'Y a?rJf~ -mo o PI I/ tai r-.> ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re-Inspection required: es No *when corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: - Inspector: DO NOT REMOI)E THIS NOTICE ♦,~4' CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office ' (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address/Permit Number: Y7. 3 90081 0?cam'73 .h / f e'rv fli' 44!Vtl AYVV5'r 7_' A) 7`v&' 6>,r✓ TES7 6) d:WV GN Tf.S'r" sl'°!/2 rJ~ GI! .1-7r,2 4 Re-Inspection required: Yes No 'When corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-2345933 Date: el3 ag Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE ❑ No one available for inspection: Time 3: ra AWPM .~),~~"rD rniri, 3~c,~~~>.f t.~~-f~CN•.la..v7 of €s~• ~VG T ' CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office ' (303) 235-2857 Far r-. INSPECTION NOTICE.<i fi k~lS_D Inspection Type: Ez~~K //17J z s Job Address/Permit Number: %~DUS2 r, ❑ No one available for inspectiorr,-Time AM/PM Re-Inspection required: Yes When corrections have been Date: IzY Inspector: i re-inspection at 303-234-5933 DO NOT REMOVE" THIS NOTICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office ' (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address/Permit Number:/_25~ v ds,2S7 -'¢/~Gl'~ ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re-Inspection required: Yes b~ When corrections have been made, ~f for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 I Date: V V Inspector: i1/ 7 1iV L/ DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE Page 1 of 4 John Schumacher From: Jerry DiTullio Oerryditullio@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 4:44 PM To: Kenneth Johnstone; 'steve blakesley' Cc: John Schumacher; Randy Young Subject: RE: 4753 Dover Street Permit Steve, I would like to see the Dover St. project completed as soon as possible, and I'm sure you are ready to move on also...I respectfully ask that you implement the 5 steps below outlined by Ken on this project with regards to inspections and the roof, etc... This will give us (the City) a paper trail and will help avoid any future "he said she said". We all want good customer service and closure on the Dover St. project. And I believe this is a good start for everyone involved. I would encourage you to keep an open dialogue with Ken and document all of your future projects and discussions. Thanks Mayor Jerry DiTullio Wheat Ridge City Hall 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office: 303.235.2800 Cell: 720.253.6785 Never confuse motion with action - Benjamin Franklin .4t I City of Wa `.d f ?'SICE Of IHt MAYOR CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Johnstone [mailto:kjohnstone@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 1:35 PM To: steve blakesley Cc: John Schumacher; Randy Young; Jerry DlTullio; Jerry DiTullio Subject: 4753 Dover Street Permit Mr. Blakesley, Thanks again for taking the time to meet with me on Wednesday afternoon. I appreciate the opportunity to hear your perspective on the various building permit projects that we discussed. Both John and I are committed to delivering a building permit and inspection program that 8/4/2008 Page 2 of 4 provides quality, consistent and fair services. We believe the building division is critical to ensuring that the City of Wheat Ridge is a high quality, healthy and safe place to live now and long into the future. Based on our conversation Wednesday, I developed a list of questions pertaining mostly to the project at 4753 Dover Street. I have had an opportunity to discuss those with John as well as research file records and this e-mail summarizes my understanding of the status of each of those areas of concern. It also provides next steps for you to pursue with the building division to reach resolution on this project. Roof. At the mid-roof inspection on 4/24/08, it was noted by the Building Inspector that the starter course of shingles needed a nailing correction and that the nails had over-penetrated a number of the shingles that had been installed and that those needed to be repaired. The inspection card also noted that re-inspection of the work was required and provided a phone number to call to request that re-inspection. It also noted that is was OK to continue roofing provided the corrections were made and the re-inspection was requested. I understand that you believe that you corrected the work as noted on the inspection notice. Unfortunately, you did not call for the requested re-inspection for the City to confirm that you had corrected the two items noted on the inspection card. In the intervening time, the roof shingles have of course sealed, making it more difficult for the City to verify that the work has been corrected. In the spirit of compromise, we are willing to accept a letter from a technical representative of the manufacturer stating that the roofing has been installed in compliance with all warranty requirements. If you are able to obtain that letter, please call for a final roof inspection and provide that letter at that time. Plumbine. I understand that much of the final plumbing work in the house has been completed. Our records indicate that no rough plumbing inspections have been requested nor completed and there are several notes on inspection cards for other types of inspections identifying the need to obtain a rough plumbing inspection and water supply pressure test. You had also mentioned in our conversation that you felt that the inspector had verbally communicated some level of approval, which would of course not be a typical practice. The purpose of the inspection card is to communicate approval and/or necessary corrections. You had also mentioned that you felt the fact that we approved a framing inspection with a note to allow drywall might have implied approval of rough plumbing. In looking at the note on that partial framing inspection, only a limited number of rooms were OK'd to drywall and those did not include the bathroom or kitchen, where additional plumbing work needed to be installed and inspected. Rough plumbing inspections are still required and may necessitate exposing portions of the plumbing through walls that I understand may have been dry-walled and finished. While this is obviously an inconvenience, I assume that will be necessary to approve the plumbing work. In speaking with John, it sounds as though that can be minimally invasive and can likely be done from the opposite side of the bathroom wall to avoid impacting finish work such as tile. The drainage piping will of course also need to be inspected and approved and based on information from both you and John, it appears the location of the new water heater will need to be adjusted to allow for property discharge piping. You can deal with that issue more specifically through the plumbing inspection process. Mechanical L Electrical: The project has received final electrical inspection as you noted in your e-mail. The permit for the new furnace received a rough mechanical inspection and approval on 1/8/08. The required rough mechanical inspection was not requested for the main remodel project. As a result, the new ductwork was not inspected prior to the installation of drywall. 8/4/2008 Page 3 of 4 You will need to request a rough mechanical inspection and we are hoping that our inspector will be able to adequately review that work through the crawl space, though we cannot guarantee that. Cut Floor Joist. On the furnace rough mechanical inspection card, it was noted that a floor joist had been cut into to allow for the bathtub drain piping and that an engineer's letter would be needed to verify the structural integrity of that joist. To my knowledge, we have not yet received that verification, so please work on that. Permit Fees. I understand that you have some concerns that you may have paid excessive building permit fees on this project as a result of you or your subcontractors applying for multiple permits rather than a single combination permit. In researching our records on this matter, it appears you first applied for (and we approved) a demolition permit in order to get the project started before the full scope of the project had been developed. Your electrical contractor then applied for (and the City approved) a permit for a new 200 Amp service and rough electrical work. Two weeks later you applied for the main permit which noted an interior remodel, addition of bathroom and new roof. We relied on your stated valuation of the work to determine permit fees for the main permit. Lastly, your mechanical subcontractor applied for a furnace and A/C permit, which was not listed in the scope of work as identified on your main permit. I believe we have applied the City's building permit fees properly. I understand you are eager to reach finalization on this project and receive all necessary inspections and ultimately the Certificate of Occupancy. I believe the next steps would be the following: 1. Call in for a rough plumbing inspection. 2. Call in for a rough mechanical inspection. 3. Call in for a roof final inspection provided you have a letter from the manufacturer as discussed earlier. 4. Provide an Engineer's letter regarding the structural issue on the floor joist. 5. Please let John know when you are requesting the inspections so that he can participate in those inspections. You raised some questions on permit fees on other projects during our meeting and I will respond to those questions separately. I trust this letter provides you with the necessary means to reach closure on this project, understanding that some correction measures will presumably be necessary to allow the city to approve all of the required building safety inspections. Please let me know if you have questions. Ken Johnstone, AICP Cornryntnity Development Director 7500 W. 29th 9veiiue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2844 Fax: 301-234-2824 w. wci.whei[ridge.ceas 8/4/2008 Page 4 of 4 City Of I R_-C.49.. U 7C CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This a-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, elech'onic storage or use of [his eonanunication is prohibited. If you received this communication in en'or, please notify us itmnediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message boom your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. 8/4/2008 Pagel of 2 John Schumacher From: John Schumacher Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 11:23 AM To: monumentplaza@hotmail.com Cc: Kenneth Johnstone; Randy Young; Kirk Cadotte Subject: Today's rough plumbing and lath inspections at 4753 Dover Street Mr. Blakesley, This is to confirm that the requested rough plumbing and lath inspections for 4753 Dover Street were performed today by Kirk Cadotte and me. The results of these inspections and the related conversation were: LATH 1. Staples are required to be installed at a maximum of 6 inches on center both horizontally and vertically. 2. Weep screed is required to be elevated a minimum of 1 inch above solid surfaces below. 3. Proper flashing above garage side and overhead doors is required. PLUMBING 1. Laundry room plumbing is required to be in a conditioned space or all appliances and related piping must be protected from freezing. 2. Water closet shall have a minimum of 4 inches from edge of vanity to closest edge of toilet tank. (See IRC Figure 307.1) * Spacing issues cannot be fully verified until fixtures are set, but based on rough-in locations, this item was noted. 3. Complete plumbing piping at kitchen sink and dishwasher connection. (venting method is not currently determinable) 4. Water heater pan drain piping must drain to an approved receptacle. (currently drains on to foundation wall in crawl space) 5. DWV piping is leaking in multiple locations in crawl space. 6. Negative slope on laundry drain piping and other piping in crawl space. 7. Draftstopping/Firestopping related to installation of plumbing is incomplete. 8. Drainage piping is required to be supported within 2 feet of change of direction and maximum 4 feet on center. 9. Open up walls to expose plumbing and firestopping. (2 areas were marked on the walls opposite the shower valves in an effort to minimize need for demolition of completed work. Walls will also need to be opened as required to complete item #10. Additional demolition of walls may be required, dependent upon ability to view code requirements from opened areas and results of observations) 10. Secure all water supply lines for bathroom fixtures per code requirements. Please complete all of the required corrections noted above and call for re-inspection. When calling for re-inspection, I would request that you notify me at the same time that you are requesting your inspection(s) through the Inspection Request Line, as stated in Ken Johnstone e-mail response to you. While I was available for today's inspections, it is possible that without notice I may not be available, which would prohibit the performance of the required inspections. 8/4/2008 Page 2 of 2 Should you have any questions related to the above listed items or the project and process in general, please do not hesitate to contact me. Cordially, John C. Schumacher, Jr., C130 Chief Building Official 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2853 Fax: 303-234-2857 uvvvvv.ci.yvheatridd e co,us City of VV h l c;- Cr3,~aaG;va9n t.~E tF Ci}6'.~1 Chi'C CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. 8/4/2008 Page 1 of 3 John Schumacher From: Kenneth Johnstone Sent: Tue 7/22/2008 5:49 PM To: John Schumacher Cc: Randy Young Subject: Steve Blakesely - Orion Development Attachments: John, I met with Steve Blakesley this afternoon to discuss some questions and potential concerns that he has on some recent and ongoing residential remodel projects that he has ongoing in the City. Most if not all of those projects are being done in partnership with WR2020. Based on our conversation, I have several questions that I would request that you please look into and get me a written response. 4753 Dover Street • Roof. At the mid roof inspection, I understood that the inspector indicated that the over-penetration of the nails had to be corrected prior to proceeding forward to completing the roof. Mr. Blakesley indicated that the inspection card indicated that the over-penetration needed to be corrected but that the work was allowed to proceed to completion. In a more general way, he had some concern that the mid-roof inspection occurs well into the completion of the roof work, which is awkward if corrections are needed. Your thoughts on that issue would be appreciated. • Plumbing. I understood that no rough plumbing inspections occurred on the property and that some work may have been concealed by drywall. Steve indicated that Kirk gave verbal approval of a pressure water test on the plumbing system in the bath and they proceeded to drywall based on that approval. He also indicated that by granting a drywall inspection approval, we had implicitly approved of the rough plumbing. Please respond. • Electrical final inspections. Mr. Blakesley recalled that they have received an electrical final on the hot water heater in the crawl space and wondered whether any code compliance issues associated with that inspection should have been caught at that time. Please elaborate on what some of the potential code compliance issues may be and provide a response on the timing of communicating those concerns. • Separate permits. Mr. Blakesley had some questions regarding the fees associated with the multiple permits that were applied for and approved on the project. Specifically, he questioned whether the City could have added both the fumace and the electrical permits to the main permit as subcontractors and included the value of that work within the base valuation that was provided on the main permit, thus saving them some money on permit fees. He indicated that the furnace was specifically listed as part of the scope on the main permit. • Mechanical inspections. Mr. Blakesley indicated he was unaware of the need for a mechanical (duct work) inspection and thought that would be covered at the mechanical rough inspection or some other time. Please elaborate on the timing for the mechanical inspections. • I understand that there are also some potential issues with some cuts that have been made into structural floor joists. Mr. Blakesley seemed to indicate he thought the issue had been addressed. Please give me a status on that matter. • Mr. Blakesley understands that he has a need to call for additional inspections prior to completing the project and receiving a certificate of occupancy. He indicated that he is planning on calling for a plumbing final inspection as early as the next few days. Could you please give me your understanding of what additional inspections will be necessary for this project. https://wrmail.ci.wheattidge.co.us/exchange/jschumacher/Inbox/Steve%20Blakesely%20-... 7/22/2008 Page 2 of 3 Somerset Condos Valuation. Mr. Blakesley was of the opinion that the valuation determination that the City made for these projects overstates the value of the work. Please summarize your methodology for determining the value of the work on those permits. • Permit fees. Mr. Blakesley requested consideration for returning some or all of the permit fees for the siding permit based on the vagueness as to the City's requirement for that type of permit when the work was commenced. I would appreciate your consideration of the merits of that request. 3700 Jay Street Mr. Blakesley felt that the valuation methodology we used in determining the value of this recent remodel project by another contractor may have resulted in a much lower valuation than he felt appropriate relative the valuations we have used on his projects. Please respond. Thanks in advance for your response to these questions. Ken Johnstone, AICP Community Development Director 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2844 Fax: 303-234-2824 www.ci.wheatrid2c.co.us City of W heat ]gc Conanlurvrrv prvilorn+nur CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by a-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. https://wrmail.ci.wheatridge.co.us/exchange/jschumacher/lnboxISteve%20Blakesely%20-... 7/22/2008 Page 1 of I John Schumacher From: Kirk Cadotte Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 2:32 PM To: John Schumacher Subject: 4753 Dover Street John FYI I stopped at Dover street to see what's been taking so long for this house to be completed since they told us they had 60 day turn around times. There is a for sale sign out front that say's "coming soon" so I looked in the front window and from what I could see, the bathroom, visible to me was completed except for the installation of the vanity base and sink. The kitchen appears to be done and the bedrooms appear to be done. I returned to the office and checked the file thinking maybe other inspections were done on a day I might have been out but no other inspection notices are in the file. I had a frame inspection on 3/25/08 and item number four states that plumbing to be installed and under test. April 3rd, 2008 1 had a frame re-inspection and Item number one, one A and one B were written to the contractor again stating the need for plumbing inspections. On April 8th 2008 1 mentioned again the need to have plumbing inspections, and like I mention above, it appears that the bathrooms are done Dirk C.adotte Combination Inspector 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ride, Colorado 30033 Ofliee Phone: 303-235-2850 Fax: 303-235-2857 cjw cr N0ieauidge co.us t ty c>i M1S1N37Y I76-1'F.1d7Ph1Eh11- Coma CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. 7/9/2008 4753 Dover Street • Roof. The failure of the mid-roof inspection for over-penetrated nails was noted on the correction notice of 4/24/08, with additional, notes that stated "OK to continue roofing" and re-inspection required. The mid-roof inspection is performed in this manner to allow the contractor to correct the deficiencies or improper nailing, while continuing application of the remaining roofing in the corrected manner. This prevents a cessation of work until re-inspection can be performed, usually on the next business day, and also decreases the period of time that the roofing remains incomplete, thus reducing risk to both the contractor and the building owner. It is necessary to have a portion of the roofing in place to inspect code requirements such as nail quantity, spacing and depth, in addition to underlayment thickness, overlap and attachment prior to completion and sealing of the shingles. The installation quantity of twenty-five percent to seventy-five percent is established to ensure that an adequate amount of work is in place for inspection, but also to allow flexibility for the roofer in coordination of inspections without requiring a stoppage in work. In this instance, just less than fifty percent of the roofing was in place at the time that the inspection was performed. Concerning the timing of the mid-roof inspection, to perform an inspection prior to an adequate amount of roofing having been installed would negate the usefulness of the inspection, and to eliminate the mid-roof inspection and check for all code requirements at final inspection would not be possible or would require extensive work or even removal and replacement of roofing materials when corrections are required. Performance of a mid-roof inspection per current policy is designed to identify deficiencies in roofing application prior to completion, thus allowing correction of any deficiencies prior to the sealing of the shingles and minimizing the amount of work requiring correction. Plumbing. It is not the policy of the Building Division to give verbal approval of inspections, and, in fact, when any inspection is performed, results are given in written form. Three separate written correction notices were provided during inspections on which it was noted that plumbing inspections were required but had not been performed. In addition to water or air testing of supply and drainage piping, plumbing systems are required to meet code requirements for proper connection to the supply and drainage system, proper slope, sizing, protection from freezing and breakage, support, and other code requirements. Based on observations made during a July 14, 2008 meeting with Mr. Blakesley at the structure, this testing could not have possibly passed inspection because the plumbing system is still incomplete and cannot be tested in its' current state. As a result of a partial framing inspection performed on 3/25/08, permission was given to drywall in particular areas of the home, specifically "Living Room, NW Bedroom and closet, NE Bedroom." It was also noted that bathroom plumbing needed to be installed and tested. These were the only areas specified because other areas of the structure which contained plumbing and mechanical systems had not received the rough inspections required to permit approval of the framing and installation of insulation and drywall. Permission to drywall particular areas of the structure was given at the request of Mr. Blakesley to facilitate advancement of the project and does not constitute implied approval of the plumbing, and, in fact, the notation of the absence of plumbing inspections was made in an effort to prevent any such inference. Subsequent approval of drywall was partial, and related only to those specific areas approved for drywall installation as listed in the 3/25/08 inspections. Electrical Final Inspections. Electrical inspections are performed by Master Electrician Mike Villano at the request of the project contractor or electrician. Mr. Villano's area of expertise and qualification is electrical, and he does not perform plumbing inspections. A request was made for inspection of the electrical service upgrade, which was performed on 6/27/08. During this inspection, a request was made for an unscheduled inspection of the electrical work associated with the interior remodel, and the inspection was performed and approved. A request for plumbing inspection was never received by the Building Division. It is not common practice for building inspectors to perform inspections in areas for which they are not trained and where inspection is not requested, nor would most contractors desire to have inspectors inspecting and noting violations in disciplines not related to their requested inspection type. It is interesting to note the shift of responsibility to the Building Division for determining the timing and types of inspections to be performed and the disciplines to be included in each requested inspection. Separate permits. Permits were provided in the order requested and at the valuations stated by Mr. Blakesley and his contractors. Permits for this project were purchased as follows: 1/24/08 Permit 4080061 Demolition - requested by Mr. Blakesley 2/01/08 Permit 4080093 New 200 Amp service and rough electrical work - requested by John Sturken 2/19/08 Permit #080150 Interior remodel, addition of bathroom, new roof - requested by Steve Blakesley 4/01/08 Permit #080284 Replace furnace and add A/C - requested by Paul Fortenberry As can be seen above, Mr. Blakesley's electrical contractor requested a permit for the service upgrade and additional interior electrical work prior to the issuance of a permit for the interior remodel. The submitted plans for the interior remodel included an electrical plan, on which there is no indication of an electrical service upgrade. Mr. Blakesley's application for the interior remodel permit states "interior remodel, add of bathroom, new roof'. There is no mention of a new furnace/AC or electrical service upgrade made in the description of work, the section of the application in which BTU's and amps information is requested is blank, despite having been completed on many of Mr. Blakesley's other applications, and no where on the submitted or approved plans is it indicated that he will replacing or adding a furnace/AC or upgrading the service. Since the permit for the electrical service upgrade was purchased prior to the interior remodel permit, if the service upgrade work was to be included the remodel permit, which, from the submitted plans, it appears that it was not, it would have been the responsibility of Mr. Blakesley to exclude this work from his stated valuation, which was used unaltered to determine the permit fees. The request for a furnace permit after the issuance of the remodel permit was processed as submitted, and could have been added to the interior remodel permit, but this was not requested. Based on conversations with Mr. Blakesley, the furnace was a result of a change order and Mr. Blakesley does not feel he should be responsible for permits required for work by his sub contractors, thus the request for a separate permit made by the HVAC contractor. Again, it appears that Mr. Blakesley is attempting to place the responsibility for accurate submission and coordination of his project permits on the Building Division. For the past six weeks it has been suggested that contractors, including Mr. Blakesley, should have the ability to purchase separate permits for the various portions of their remodeling projects to save them fees, but Mr. Blakesley now indicates that he feels that he was in some way over charged or treated improperly by being allowed to do exactly what he has been advocating. It has also been asserted that the Building Division has exercised too much influence in the valuation and permitting of these projects, yet on this particular project, the assertion is that the Building Division failed to act properly when it processed in the exact order at the unaltered valuation each of the permits requested by Mr. Blakesley. • Mechanical Inspections. The need for inspection of mechanical systems, which would include ductwork, is clearly stated in the 2003 International Residential Code Section RI 09.1.2 which states "Rough inspection of plumbing, mechanical, gas and electrical systems shall be made prior to covering or concealment, before fixtures or appliances are set or installed, and prior to frame inspection." Inspection of ductwork as a part of the rough mechanical has been in the codes and a standard part of the inspection process for decades. As stated in the code, rough mechanical inspection and approval is required prior to final approval of rough framing. Rough mechanical inspections were required and performed on another project performed by Mr. Blakesley within the City. If one is to accept Mr. Blakesley's assertion that he was unaware of the need for this mechanical inspection, this demonstrates a lack of knowledge of the most basic requirements and procedures set forth in the codes, is disconcerting, and in my opinion, constitutes reasonable cause for reconsideration of the continuation of unlimited licensing of Mr. Blakesley's firm. • Cut Floor Joist. The cut floor joist and need for repair was noted on the correction notice for the furnace inspection performed on 4/8/08, and remained umepaired, as pictures indicate, at the time of my meeting with Mr. Blakesley on July 14, 2008. Additional inspections. Mr. Blakesley will not be able to receive final inspections without first resolving the failure to obtain the required rough inspections and the many code violations that currently exist. Mr. Blakesley did not request all of the necessary rough inspections related to framing, plumbing and mechanical, nor did he request all of the necessary insulation and drywall inspections. Based on the substantial number of violations in this work that is visible, investigative inspections requiring exposure of concealed work are necessary. The corrections and inspections that will be required as a result of those investigative inspections cannot be determined at this time. Miscellaneous comments. Mr. Blakesley has been issued an unlimited general contractors license by the City of Wheat Ridge, has performed a similar project at 3950 Kendall Street, and based on statements made by him, has done a vast number of this type project throughout his career. Despite these facts, Mr. Blakesley has initiated or performed work on at least three projects in the City of Wheat Ridge prior to obtaining the legally required permits, has concealed work without inspection on at least four separate projects, and has been found to have unlicensed subcontractors on every project performed by him that has been legally permitted by the Building Division. Mr. Blakesley made representations in his meeting with you concerning permits, costs, and inspections that are verifiably inaccurate. Mr. Blakesley was permitted to obtain separate permits, as he requested, with fees assessed on the unaltered valuations stated on his permit applications, and now contends that he was treated unfairly by being granted everything exactly as requested. Mr. Blakesley failed to obtain the required inspections and re-inspections on this project, covered work that requires inspection, and has related work that is visibly in violation of the most basic requirements of code. Mr. Blakesley has repeatedly violated city ordinances and building code requirements, without penalty, has committed multiple violations on this project, and fails to acknowledge any responsibility for his action, despite the existence of written documentation of warnings and notations of violations. Mr. Blakesley has been given consideration well beyond that of most contractors, is solely responsible for current state of this project, and is not deserving of any additional consideration for waiver of full compliance with all code requirements. Somerset Condos Valuation. Valuation is based on value added to the structure, including all finish work and painting, in accordance with published Building Valuation Data by ICC, which is used by local jurisdictions such as City of Lakewood. The base added value determined for these projects was taken from the WR2020 Ranch House Renovation: Design Idea Book. The combined average resale value as stated in this document, which is stated as seventy percent or less of cost, for a minor kitchen remodel ($15,410) and bathroom remodel ($10,286) constituted the base valuation ($25,696). To this was added a valuation of $4,400 for the new furnace, AC and ductwork (Contract price was $5200). The installation of a new gas fireplace was valued at $1,500. And an additional valuation of $2,000 for electrical, framing, drywall and trim related to the new walls, alcove, balustrade, smoke detectors and misc work throughout the unit was added, bringing the total valuation to $33,596. Based on Mr. Blakesleys statements that the work in each unit was identical, and his submission of plans also indicating identical work, this valuation was applied to each permit in the complex for which he applied. During the discussion on 6/5/08 with Mr. Blakesley concerning these valuations, he was offered a chance to present his signed contracts for the entire scope of work on the project for consideration of revaluation. At that time, he indicated there were separate contracts on the project for HVAC, for the gas fireplace, and for his work, and that his contract was in excess of $40,000. Based on the proper application of building valuation data and stated values of work by WR2020, with added contract values stated by Mr. Blakesley or obtained from contractors, I believe the valuation to be fair and accurate. • Permit Fees. While the web site was inaccurate concerning the need for siding and window pen-nits, the requirements in the codes for siding have been consistent for years. Additionally, a meeting was held with Mr. Blakesley and Mr. Osborn on February 19, 2008, at their request, to discuss permitting requirements. At that meeting, Community Development staff was specifically questioned as to the need for permits for siding and windows, and Mr. Osborn questioned the erroneous information on the web site. Mr. Blakesley and Mr. Osborn were informed that the information was erroneous and that permits for siding were covered under the code. Two weeks passed from the time of that meeting before the unpermitted work was discovered and stopped. In addition to performing the siding project, Mr. Blakesley completely renovated 6912 W. 48th Avenue and began renovation of 6920 W. 48th Avenue without the legally required permits. City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code 5-76 Section 108.4.1 and 108.4.2 state that "whenever any work for which a permit is required by this code has been commenced without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. An investigative fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code." Essentially, this is the standard "double" fee assessed by most building divisions for starting work without a permit. This fee was initially added to Mr. Blakesley's permits for these two units, but in an effort to foster a more cooperative relationship with Orion Development, and after an hour long discussion with Mr. Blakesley on June 5, 2008, Mr. Blakesley's permits were reprinted with the doubled permit fees removed. This amounted to a total savings to Mr. Blakesley of $3,278.14. Additionally, based on the urging of Mayor DiTullio for consideration of reduction of plan review fees of repetitive plans, Mr. Blakesley was charged a $100.00 plan review fee for 6930 W. 48th Avenue in lieu of the prescribed fee of $407.47, which resulted in a savings of $307.47. This reduction and reasoning for reduction is noted on the printed permit document. The reduction in penalties and plan review fees afforded to Mr. Blakesley is $3,585.61. Mr. Blakesley was clearly informed of the need for a siding permit, but did not obtain one prior to initiating work. He subsequently performed work on two separate projects without required permits, for which penalties were waived. He was afforded a reduced plan review fee, based on requests from Mayor DiTullio and information provided, which may now be erroneous. He has used unlicensed subcontractors on each of these projects, and is currently in violation of municipal and building code requirements on the project at 4753 Dover Street. It is my opinion that Mr. Blakesley has been afforded consideration well beyond reasonable expectation, and that the consideration has not resulted in an improved relationship or increased efforts of compliance on the part of Mr. Blakesley. I do not believe that a refund of any fees is warranted or deserving of consideration. • Miscellaneous comments. Mr. Blakesley's spreadsheet of permit costs includes inaccurate plan review fees for 6918 W. 48`x' Avenue, and reflects a discounted plan review fee of $100, which is indicated on the permit notes as having been reduced based on submission of a repetitive plan. Mr. Blakesley's spreadsheet also lists his costs for work in each of the eight units that have been permitted, and these costs indicate variations on at least four units. Assertions by Mr. Blakesley and others for the past six weeks that he should have been granted discounted plan review fees based on the each of the eight units is contradicted by the variation in costs which is based on the work to be performed. Mr. Blakesley has initiated several projects at this location without the required permits, and has covered work without the required inspections. In fact, the model unit of this complex was completed without permit, is open to the public, was not permitted until June 5, 2008, and to this date has not received any inspections. Mr. Blakesley and others have misrepresented to interested parties the facts and circumstances surrounding this project, have repeatedly and blatantly violated city codes, and are still in violation of codes. The Building Division has offered cooperation and accommodation and has imposed no penalties on Mr. Blakesley, although thoroughly warranted. Mr. Blakesley has, in turn, made no effort to resolve issues surrounding 6912 W. 48'11 Avenue, and has repeated some of the code violations committed at this location on other projects. 3700 Jay Street • Valuations. Mr. Blakesleys assumptions concerning this project are accurate. The contractor for this project was present at a meeting with Mayor DiTullio, Rob Osborn, City Manager Randy Young, you and me on May 1, 2008, at which time requests for leniency in an effort to resolve outstanding issues was made by Mayor DiTullio. Statements of valuation on projects at this address and one other were made on permit applications by this contractor, to which I raised objection. I was asked, in the interest of appeasement and cooperation, to accept these valuations, which were clearly understated. Permits were issued with costs based on these valuations. While these valuations were lower relative to the valuations of Mr. Blakesley's projects, the resulting savings to that contractor were still significantly lower than those afforded to Mr. Blakesley in the waiving of his investigative inspection and plan review fees. This issue serves as an example of the potential problems and perceptions of favoritism that are created due to inconsistent valuation and enforcement of fees and codes, and the need for fair and equal treatment of all Building Division customers. Based on this need for fairness and consistency, I believe that Mr. Blakesley's request for refund of his siding permit fees should be denied. ~`~F~ ~t~~:~e s.. 4tl'%NHE,, eat Ridge City of Wh Residential Demoliti PERMIT - 080061 ;'PERMIT N0: 080061 ISSUED: 01/24/2008 111~JOB ADDRESS: 4753 DOVER ST EXPIRES: 07/22/2008 DESCRIPTION: INTERIOR DEMO - NON STRUCTURALIST FLOOR AND GARAGE I4 S01; CONTACTS 11,OWNER 720/275-9479 ROB OSBORNE SHEAT RIDGE 2020 jj"'~GC 484/357-7281 STEVE BLAKESLEY 07-0217 ORION DEVELOPMENT, LLC PARCEL INFO ZONE CODE: UA USE: UA ti ~E SUBDIVISION: 0215 BLOCK/LOT#: 0/ FEE SUMMARY ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 600.00 c FEES :Permit Fee 2 50.00 < Total Valuation .00 TOTAL 50.00 ditions: . STRUCTURAL DEMO ONLY OF INTERIOR FIRST FLOOR AND GARAGE AREAS. NO FURTHER .K ALLOWED UNDER THIS PERMIT. DUMPSTER MUST BE ON PROPERTY AND REMOVED WITHIN DAYS OF ISSUANCE I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. of date This permit was issued in accordance with the provisions set forth in your application and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Codes of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the City. This permit shall expire 180 days from the issue date. Requests for an extension must be received prior to expiration date. An extension may be granted at the discretion of the Building Official. If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifications and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes have been or if suspension or abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full fees shall be paid for a new permit. No work of any manner shall be done that will change the natural flow of water causing a drainage problem. Contractor shall notify the Building Inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspection card before proceeding with successive phases of the job. The issuance of a permit or the approval of drawings and specifications shall not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, any violati of/kzse provisions of the building codes or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. All plan review i on s subj e~.'I( A~ ld inspections. of Chief Building/Official Cate N REQUEST LINE: (303)234-5933 BUILDING OFFICE: (303)235-2855 MUST BE MADE BY 3PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY e wR qr o R City of Wheat Ridge Building Division Date: 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 ` " -,fin Office:303-235-2855'Fax:303-235-2857 Plan cOLORp00 0 Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Permit O Building Permit Application Property Address: q 76 3 i0o ve r Property Owner (please print): ylk 0l'2 8 Phone: 2a®-d 7S', 1 7 Mailing Address: (if different than property address) Address: ~"fJ G©~ j f City, sState, Zip l Le I-e,7 n Cn $O I Q Contractor: OR,-On D'e✓G how m'afy t Contractor License Phone: 1 D 7' -3§7- 2:~?,e/ Sub Contractors: Electrical City License Plumbing City License Mechanical City License Company: Company Company: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Approval: Approval: Approval: Use of space (description): Construction Value: s Description of work: n,~^ SLr~/G~. (as calculated per the Building Valuation Data sheet) 6mxwl 1 `r Plan Review (due at time of submittal): $ Q~ t Sq. Ft./L.Ft added: Squares BTU's Gallons Amps OWNERICONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. CIIYLCE ONE:: (OWNER) ONTRACTOR or PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of (OWNER) (CONTRATO PRINT NAME: k" SIGNATURE: Dater ZONING COMMENTS: Zoning: Reviewer: PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: Reviewer: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: OCCUPANCY: Reviewer: FIRE DEPARTMENT:: 0 approved w/ comments ❑ disapproved ❑ no review required I Bldg Valuation: City of Wheat Ridge Residential Mechanic PERMIT - 080284 IT NO: 080284 ISSUED: 04/01/2008 ADDRESS: 4753 DOVER ST EXPIRES: 09/28/2008 RIPTION: Replace furnace 90%, 45K BTU and add on 1.5 ton A/C. CONTACTS 303/456-7995 Paul Fortenberry Orion Development 07-0062 American Heating and Cooling PARCEL INFO E CODE: UA USE: r-3 DIVISION: 0215 BLOCK/LOT##: 0/ * FEE SUMMARY ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 4,600.00 FEES Permit Fee 144.70 Total Valuation .00 Use Tax 82.80 TOTAL 227.50 hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable dinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all asurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this plication and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other .,*cable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. p contractor/owner date This permit was issued in accordance with the provisions set forth in your application and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Codes of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the City. This permit shall expire 180 days from the issue date. Requests for an extension must be received prior to expiration date. An extension may be granted at the discretion of the Building Official. If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifications and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes have been or if suspension or abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full fees shall be paid for a new permit. No work of any manner shall be done that will change the natural flow of water causing a drainage problem. Contractor shall notify the Building Inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspection card before proceeding with successive phases of the job. The issuance of a permit or the approval of drawings and specifications shall not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, any violation of the provisions of the building codes or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. All plan revib,7 is/habject to field inspections. Otticial date N REQUEST LINE: (303)234-5933 BUILDING OFFICE: (303)235-2855 MUST BE MADE BY 3PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. oFw"E?rq City of Wheat Ridge Building Division 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855 « Fax: 303-235-2857 c~~ORPUO O Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Building Permit Application Date: Plan Permit Property Address: l.ls2j oavf 2 S-r Property Owner (please print): Phone: Mailing Address: (if different than property address) Address: State, _5/lI Contractor: F t 91CAOf I(~A~rl► ICS 8D, I /167 10G' Contractor License Phone: Sub Contractors: Electrical City License Plumbing City License Mechanical City License Company: Company Company: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Approval: Approval: Approval: ) IIGvgPG r R Use ri space (description): JPr( t TU~1 ~l4CE Construction Value: $ (as calculated per the Building Valuation Data sheet) Description of work: 451(W DILL -1O I,\A`✓Y, hm b0 A~ Plan Review (due at time of submittal): $ IA, Sq. Ft./L.Ft added: Squares BTU's Gallons Amps OWNERICONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field Inspection. CIRLCE ONE:: PRINT NAME: or PERSONAL SIGNATURE: (CONTRATOR) Date: ZONING COMMENTS: Zoning: Reviewer: PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: Reviewer: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY W BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: OCCUPANCY: Reviewer: FIRE DEPARTMENT:: ❑ approved wlcomments ❑ disapproved ❑ no review required Bldg Valuation: $ OF WHE4,- m City of Wheat Ridge °OZORP~0 Residential Remodel PERMIT - 080150 PERMIT NO: 080150 ISSUED: 02/19/2008 70B ADDRESS: 4753 DOVER ST EXPIRES: DESCRIPTION: Interior remodel, addition of bathroom, new roof. CONTACTS owner 720/275-9479 - Wheat Ridge 2020 3c 484/357-7281 STEVE BLAKESLEY 07-0217 ORION DEVELOPMENT, LLC sub 720/062-9666 John Sturken 02-2378 JHS Electric x* PARCEL INFO ;ONE CODE: UA USE: r-3 SUBDIVISION: 0215 BLOCK/LOT#: 0/ k* FEE SUMMARY ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 94,000.00 FEES Permit Fee 1,237.35 'Plan Review Fee 804.28 Total Valuation .00 Use Tax 1,692.00 TOTAL 3,733.63 ditions: . APPROVED WITH ATTACHED RED LINE AND REVIEW NOTES BJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS/APPROVAL hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable dinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all asurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this plication and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other plicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. of contractor/o0n4r date This permit was issued in accordance with the provisions set forth in your application and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Codes of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the City. This permit shall expire 180 days from the issue date. Requests for an extension must be received prior to expiration date. An extension may be granted at the discretion of the Building Official. If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifications and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes have been or if suspension or abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full fees shall be paid for a new permit. No work of any manner shall be done that will change the natural flow of water causing a drainage problem. Contractor shall notify the Building Inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspection card before proceeding with successive phases of the job. The issuance of a permit or the appr]]]'''a~~~l of dwings and specifications shall not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, any violation of Rhovisiorans of the building codes or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. All plan review is subject rp )fp/4'A inspections. of Chief Building OfM cial date ,N REQUEST LINE: (303)234-5933 BUILDING OFFICE: (303)235-2855 MUST BE MADE BY 3PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. .a of ""Eqr~ City of Wheat Ridge Building Division 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855 " Fax: 303-235-2857 °o[onro° Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Building Permit Application Property Address: IM "Dwelt, JT Property Owner (please print): -dylailing Address: (if different than property address) Date: a )a D "U Plan#: Permit Phone: -as9- r03O Address' Pa Box 1,2l City State Zip' bl A-f 912~-6-t Cd b nU Contractor: OgIUrJ DEVEL010tA0t( LL-C- p Contractor License 070 r~ Phone: 4 0 ~j J~7 0 Stele Sub Contractors: Electrical City License 02 a3~ Plumbing City License Mechanical City License Company: 'P46 ete -I A16 Company Company: Exp. Date: -7, 30- O Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Use of space (description): eESIDT(AL- rS1nlELL Construction alue: z °l 4, duo= / ascalcwatedp theauildingValuatton Description of work; 14-1no.tOP RC-71w6pet ~bb/T/Unl Plan Review (due at time of submittal):$ DF /3A-7 tl'466ff4 NLw /ZOala Sq. Ft./L.Ftadded: Squares~13 BTU's Gallons Amps OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. r2 ONTRACT or PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of (OWNER) (CONTRATOR) CIRLCEONE:: (OWNER) PRINTNAME: )TEt1L>AK~LEY SIGNATURE: Date: a -bg I ZONING COMMENTS: Zoning: Reviewer: PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: Reviewer: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY BUILDING DEPARTMENT CO NTS: ]rl/$ftq ~p N~~ Reviewe ,FNb Qc VIC[~ FIRE DEPARTMENT:: D a proved w/ comments D disapproved 0 no review required Bldg Valuation: OF WHEgr~ City of Wheat Ridge 0010RP00 Residential Electric PERMIT - 080093 IT NO: 080093 ISSUED: 02/01/2008 ADDRESS: 4753 DOVER ST EXPIRES: 07/30/2008 RIPTION: NEW 200 AMP SERVICE + ROUGH ELECT TO REPLACE EXISTING CONTACTS =GC 720/062-9666 John Sturken 02-2378 JHS Electric 4 PARCEL INFO ZONE CODE: UA USE: UA .ZONE 0215 BLOCK/LOT#: 0/ FEE SUMMARY ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 2,650.00 a . _ FEES Permit Fee 108.30 Total Valuation ) .00 ' Use Tax 47.70 TOTAL 156.00 =2Comments : gr~ SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTION , =.MUST MEET 2005 NEC hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable dinances, rules orguions of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all asurements shown, d a gations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this p licat ion d tha I as u e fu 1 responsibility for c mpli nce with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other plicableat ge di an s, for work under this perm' Plans subject Co field inspection. This Zjermit was issued in accordance with the brovisions set forth in your application and is subject to the laws of the Sta e of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Codes of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the City. This permit shall expire 18o days from the issue date. Requests for an extension must be received prior to expiration date. An extension may be granted at the discretion of the Building Official. If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifications and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes have been or if suspension or abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full fees shall be paid for a new permit. No work of any manner shall be done that will change the natural flow of water causing a drainage problem. Contractor shall notify the Building Inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspection card before proceeding with successive phases of the job. The issuance of a permit or the approval of drawings and specifications shall not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, any violation of the provisions of the building codes or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. All plan review is subject to field, inspections. of Chief Building Of/ 4R4". - date N REQUEST SANE :-(303)234-5933 BUILDING OFFICE: (303)235-2855 MUST BE MADE BY 3PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. oFW"E^?,p, City of Wheat Ridge Building Division m 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855 * Fax: 303-235-2857 '9 coRPO° Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Building Permit Application Property Address: . ,vrItrz Property Owner (please print): Mailing Address: (if different than property address) Address: City, Contractor: ~N ~~Cr tY Contractor License Phone: Sub Contractors: Electrical City License Plumbing City License Mechanical City License Company: Company Company: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Approval: Approval: Approval: Use of space (description): Construction Value: <9 Description of work: i (as calculated per the Bull ing Valuation Data sheet) Z(miq Plan Review (due at time of submittal): $ ekta I~ e~~c{ri~ Sq. Ft./L.Ft added: Squares BTU's Gallons Amps OWNERICONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. CIRLCE ONE:: (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) or PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of (OWNER) (CONTRATOR) PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: Date: ZONING COMMENTS: Zoning: Reviewer: PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: Reviewer: Date: Plan Permit Phone: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: OCCUPANCY: Reviewer: FIRE DEPARTMENT:: ❑ approved w/ comments ❑ disapproved ❑ no review required Bldg Valuation: $ 2, } O-b - e® City of Wheatjggie COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`" Ave. July 21, 2008 Orion Development, LLC Attn: Steve Blakesley 7887 E. Belleview Avenue Englewood, CO 80111 RE: 4753 Dover Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mr. Blakesley, i/ It was brought to the attention of the Building Division that work on the project at the above address had progressed beyond the point of inspection required by the international Residential Code and was no longer visible for inspection. At the request of the Building Division, a meeting with you was conducted at the property on Tuesday, July 14, 2008, to assess the status of the project and any code violations that had been previously noted for correction and to identify any other code violations that may exist related to the project. The attached list of code violations related to the project was generated. This list includes only the items that were readily visible, and therefore may not be a complete list of all violations that have occurred. As a result of the meeting and inspection, it has been determined that: On April 24, 2008, a mid-roof inspection was performed and required corrections were noted, including "renail all shingles with blown thru nailing." The inspection notice also indicated that work may continue, but that correction and re-inspection was required. During the inspection conducted on July 14, 2008, it was determined that corrections had not been made, that improper nailing of shingles still existed and that a re-inspection had not been requested. Inspection of only a small sampling of the roof was made due to your request that the roof inspection be terminated. On March 25, 2008, and on April 3, 2008, rough framing inspections were performed and corrections were noted. The corresponding correction notices included notes stating "bathroom plumbing to be installed and under test", "need rough plumbing inspection", and that tests for tubs and DW V were required. It was determined during the inspection on July 14, 2008, that the required rough plumbing inspections had not been performed, that drywall and wall coverings were in place, and that work had been concealed without inspection. It was also determined that substantial violations of code requirements for plumbing systems and appliances exist in work that is visible, and that a licensed plumber as required by state and municipal statutes has not been identified. Photographs of these violations were taken. On April 8, 2008, a rough mechanical inspection was performed, and one framing correction was noted. This inspection was related only to the installation of a new furnace and air conditioner, as stated on that particular permit and application. It was determined during the inspection on July 14, 2008, that the required rough mechanical inspections related to the interior remodel project had not been performed, that drywall and wall coverings were in place, and that work had been concealed without inspection. It was also determined that violations of code requirements for mechanical systems exist in work that is visible, and that the required correction or engineer approval of an over-notched floor joist noted on the April 8, 2008 inspection was not accomplished. Finally, it was determined that work has been completed in violation of building codes and without inspection and cannot be verified due to the fact that it has been concealed, and that removal of completed work as necessary to provide exposure of uninspected work areas will be required. Please be advised that correction of all items noted on the attached list of violations, in addition to any violations noted during the investigative inspection process, will be required and must be inspected and verified. Also, it is requested that you contact the Building Division no later than July 31, 2008, to discuss the process for obtaining the required investigative inspections of the concealed work and correction of the existing deficiencies in order to reach a resolution of this matter. Until this process is Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 4753 Dover Street Building and Municipal Code violations 1. Failure to list on permit or subsequently provide information for licensed plumber performing work (COWR 5-79 Sec 107.6) 2. Failure to obtain re-inspection of failed mid-roof inspection performed on 4/24/08- Roofing installation is now complete and correction of previous violations has not been verified (2003 IRC Sec R109.4) Notches in floor joists shall not exceed 1/6 of depth and shall not be located in the middle one third of the joist span (2003 IRC R502.8.1) Floor joist is over-notched in middle third of joist as noted on 4/8/08 inspection notice but has not been corrected 4. Garages shall be separated from the residence and its' attic area by not less than one-half inch drywall applied to the garage side. Openings from a garage into a residence shall be made only through the use of doors. (2003 IRC Secs R309.1 and R309.2) The garage has no drywall installed on the garage side of the separation wall or attic and has window openings from the garage to the house 5. No rough plumbing inspections have been performed on the project and work has been concealed (2003 IRC Sec 109.4) Additional plumbing violations visible from the crawl space are: a. temperature and pressure relief piping on water heater is required to be piped to the exterior or an approved drain (2003 IRC P2803.6.1) - Discharge piping drains directly into water heater pit in crawl space and is not visible to occupants b. piping is required to be fully insulated and supported in accordance with Table 2605.1 and sections P2603.6 and P3001.2 of the 2003 IRC - All supply and waste piping and the water heater are required to be insulated in crawl space c. drain lines shall be sloped as required by Sec P3005.3 of the 2003 IRC - Drain piping in crawl space has reverse slope and/or does not have code required slope d. water supply and drain, waste and vent piping shall be tested as required by 2003 IRC Secs P2503.5 and P2503.6 - No testing has been performed on any plumbing systems e. drain piping shall be connected to the sanitary drainage system (2003 IRC P2601.2) - Bathtub is not currently connected to drainage system and is draining into crawl space £ plumbing fixtures shall be spaced in accordance with IRC 2003 Figure 307.1 - Fixtures do not meet minimum spacing requirements in figure 307.1 of the 2003 IRC 6. No rough mechanical inspections have been performed on the project and work has been concealed (2003 IRC Sec 109.4) Additional mechanical violations visible from the crawl space are: a. ducting is required to be insulated to a minimum value of R-5 (2003 IRC N1103.3) - Ducting throughout crawl space is not insulated 7. Framing installations and alterations were concealed after being only partially inspected in certain portions of the project, with other areas not receiving the required inspections (2003 IRC Sec 109.4) These are the noted violations that were visible for inspection on Tuesday, July 14, 2008. Other potential violations likely exist but cannot be verified due to concealment of the work. 4' ~ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ' Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office - (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Isl.:ev,~G Job Address/Permit Number: !V7S3 a c7-4;)90..2V &V_/ Eo ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re-Inspection required: Yes `When corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: _ Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE " 1 City of Wheat Ridge _rr ►J Residential Fence PERMIT - 081290 PERMIT NO: 081290 ISSUED: 11/04/2008 TOE ADDRESS: 4753 DOVER ST EXPIRES: 05/03/2009 )ESCRIPTION: 133 if replacement with. 6' cedar CONTACTS 720/261-4967 Orion Development 02-1676 Marquez Fencing Inc. PARCEL INFO E CODE: UA DIVISION: 0215 FEE SUMMARY Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Total Valuation Use Tax TOTAL USE: UA BLOCK/LOT4: 0/ ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 1,600.00 FEES 74.22 48.24 28.80 DM 151.26 Owner/Contractor is responsible for locating proeprty lines and tructing improvements according to the approved plan and required lopment standards. The City is not responsible for inaccurate information itted within the plan set and any construction errors resulting from curate information. I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicabl Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit Plans subject to field inspection. Signat~ of contractor/ot r date This permit was issued in accordance with the provisions set forth in your application and is subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Codes of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the City. This permit shall expire 180 days from the issue date. Requests for an extension most be received prior to expiration date. An extension may be granted at the discretion of the Building Official. If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, provided no changes have been or will be made in the original plans and specifications and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. If changes have been or if suspension or abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full fees shall be paid for a new permit. No work of any manner shall be done that will change the natural flow of water causing a drainage problem. Contractor shall notify the Building Inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and shall receive written approval on inspection card before proceeding with successive phases of the job. The issuance of a permit or the approval of drawings and specifications shall not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, any violation of the provisions of the building codes or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. All plan review is subject t4 field inspections. of Chief date V N REQ 'EST LINE: (303)234-5933. BUILDING OFFICE: (303)235-2855 MUST BE MADE BY 3PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. City of Wheat Ridge Building Division m 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855 ` Fax: 303-235-2857 0 o Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 O<ORP~ Building Permit Application Date: ti,-Q +V Plan #:bg Permit © O 1ry~l Property Address: t~ 7 S? J~ Q d f. R S -T Property Owner (please print): (OR ) 0 J '0 C 1/ L` L 0 M e -l r Phone: Mailing Address: (if different than property address) Address: City State Zip i r t 5 o J CJ 2 J) Contractor: Nl li t) 2 L l~ C i r 'l C - Contractor License Phone: o 6} 7 9 S Sub Contractors: Electrical City License Plumbing City License Mechanical City License Company: Company Company: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Approval: Approval: Approval: Use of space (description): Construction Value: $ ~cl Description of work: (as calculated per the Building Valuation Data sheet) D ~a~~ P x (mi l rt'C-C W ; &JX Plan Review (due at time of submittal): $ rj ` Y c. c~ az tali I u Y 6-ic Sq. Ft./L.Ft added:r Squares BTU's Gallons Amps OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. CIRLCE ONE:: (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) or PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of (OWNER) (GONTRATOR) PRINT NAME: L\ i a`\( T c. SIGNATURE: 1- 3 Date: l ^ + o UtPHKI IVICN-:I UJC UINCI ZONING COMMENTS: Zoning: L p ( ! Reviewer: H f I r 08 PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: Reviewer: BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Reviewer: OCCUPANCY: Pf. FIRE DEPARTMENT:: ❑ approved wl comments ❑ disapproved' ❑ no review required Bldg Valuation: Co rc)- 69 D Sql Z S CvJ y Sr\\ 1~3 LI T T 16 T,?4 C(2 (76-0 i2~~rgc~~fc> 6r F&jc . w (rz S06 6o), t4A ~q16 Z r6jcIa G 306K S Sr L)-JGvG uJ,7~D Co g~ lla cED fip p RfllgC% F"6'1 CC, u5/aG ZXrkB ,~~Z~s 60 /F'" L57t HAS Te ~6c I WE 33 ~r uk6vA7ro4 $(600 FRor►~' ~~RD s~ X 53 00061 R CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division " (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office - (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE c~oz Inspection Type: Job Address/Permit Number: c s Lev (l. ) ta)~f fC.,n c~ r e' 5<5 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re-Inspection required: es No When corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: ~r~ Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE / ORION DEVELOPMENT, LLC ~..... ...,.~..~...., ..~.......~......,... '~~"~ <~.... .~.......,. ..~.....,..... ......,...... ...........~..... '-0' ............. DATE: August 21, 2008 FROM: Kim Blakesley, Managing Member MEMO TO: City of Wheat Ridge Building Office RE: Permit Extension Request Permit 080150 for 4753 Dover Street displays an issue date of2-19-08. As it states, the expiration date is 180 days from the issue date. I believe this permit is expired at this time and I respectfully request a 45 day extension. Thank you, 4~ J VD tv tV~ Please call me on my cell phone (484) 357-7285 to discuss further. .....................-......................................".....................,............................................ 5912 S. CODY STREET, SUITE:# t 03, LITTLETON, COLORADO 80 t 23 PHONE (720) 241-51 1 1 FAX (720) 26&650 1 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department Memorandum TO: Accounting Department FROM: Melissa Mackey, Building Division SUBJECT: Refund for Permit DATE: August 18, 2008 Reason: Requested revaluation for permit which resulted in new permit fee for 4753 Dover St Permit #080150. Please refund: Contractors License$ 100% permit fee: $63.70 100% plan review $41.41 100% use tax: $130.50 (acct 01-510-00-513) (acct 01-510-00-516) (acct 01-550-05-551 ) (acct 01-500-02-505) Total: $235.61 TO: Orion Development 5912 S. Cody St Suite #103 Liitleton CO 80123 Thank You! H~H~ Permit Technician Da1;eRec: 02/12/200$ ..._ PeiuiitDt: Q2I19]2Q08Expires: 10/21/2008 obDesc:r: lrite::t:i6iteuiodel..a.ddition of bil.thi66m;.new rooL rig'.PI@: ~i'J~pp 1#: I Yl d l..\..czLL.. le-Ue r f c:L-fkchn~ ~0/ cle-ck . VA1-V~ ~(Pl 15b 3-1'33.W 3lf'1 ~ I D2- (!Z~$, '0 CJ4, e-oD "'y1M~es- 86,750.00 FEES VALUATImr: 86,750.00 PEPJIIT FEE: 1,173.65 SE TAX: 1...561. 50 OTHER FEES: 762.87 ::: LP0/D 0\~\ ,'1 :;X~r:j u' l