HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-08-06e~d✓
City of
`Wheatlioge
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857
Approval of Variance
WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 10370 W. 33
Avenue, referenced as Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh; and
WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section
26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section
26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and
WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application;
NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a seven and a half (7.5) foot =yard setback
variance; reduced from fifteen (15) feet to seven and a half (7.5) feet (Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh)
is granted for the property described located at 10320 W. 33`d Avenue to construct a 397.8 square
foot attached garage, as described, based on the following findings of fact:
1. The side setback variance would not alter the character of the
neighborhood.
2. The lot has two frontages requiring increased setbacks which creates limited placement
options for the garage.
3. There will be no negative impact to the public welfare or other properties in the area.
4. The request would not substantially increase the congestion in public streets, increase
the danger of fire or endanger the public safety.
5. There have been no protests submitted during the ten-day public notification period.
6. The applicant is proposing an investment in the property.
With the following conditions:
1. The garage must be complimentary in building material and architectural style to the
home subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit.
enneth Jot e, AICP
Community De elopment Director
Date
®A4~
® City of
Wh6atRi:Ld ge
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Case File DATE: August 25, 2008
CASE MANAGER: Adam Tietz
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-08-06/Marsh
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 7.5 foot rear yard setback variance from the 15
foot setback requirement resulting in a 7.5 foot rear yard setback
for an attached garage on property zoned Residential-One (R-1).
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 10370 W 33rd Avenue
APPLICANT (S):
OWNER (S):
APPROXIMATE AREA:
Timothy Marsh
Timothy Marsh
17,753 square feet (.40 acres)
PRESENT ZONING:
Residential-One (R-1)
PRESENT LAND USE:
Single Family Residence
COMP PLAN LAND USE:
Single Family Residential not to exceed 4 units per acre
(SF4)
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
Locatic
Site
Admin:
Case N
1
JURISDICTION:
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, an administrative
decision may be made on this case.
1. REQUEST
The applicant is requesting an approval of a 7.5 (50 percent) rear side yard setback
variance in order to construct a 398 square foot, single car, attached garage at the
property indicated above.
Section 26-115.13 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the
Director of Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative
variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards that are
not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the standard.
II. CASE ANLYSIS
The applicant, Timothy Marsh, is requesting the variance as the property owner of 10370
W. 33` Avenue. The application for a 7.5 foot side yard variance is being requested so
the applicant may construct a single car, attached garage in the rear yard. The property is
zoned R-1 which requires a minimum rear yard setback of 15 feet for all structures.
These development standards were established to provide high quality, safe, quiet and
stable low-density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature
which are incompatible with the low-density residential character.
The property is located at the southeast corner of West 33`d Avenue and Miller Street.
The lot size is approximately 17,753 square feet. The minimum lot size for the R-1 zone
district is 12,500 square feet. The R-1 zone district allows for twenty-five (25) percent
maximum building coverage. The site does have a 2,420 square foot home with an
attached two car garage making the lot coverage 13.6 percent. The proposed garage will
be constructed and attached to the south side of the existing two car garage.(Exhibit 1,
Photo Simulation) The additional garage will be 398.8 square feet which will increase
the lot coverage from 13.6 percent to 15.9 percent. (Exhibit 2. Site Plan)
The existing home is on a lot that has frontage along both W. 33rd Ave and Miller St.
Since the home has two street frontages the setback for the side yard along Miller St. is
increased to 30 feet. The increased side yard setback along with 30 foot front yard set
back have resulted in a relatively large front and side yards with a rear yard that is limited
in its use and functionality. (Exhibit 3, Site Photos)
The construction of a detached garage in the rear yard that meets the setbacks is possible.
However, the garage would be very difficult to access and would take up a majority of
the back yard making it even more limited in its uses. Placing a detached garage in the
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
rear yard would also require removing other landscape improvements that the owner has
installed.
The proposed garage could also be constructed to be either attached or detached on the
east side of the property. Construction of the garage on this side of the property would
meet the side yard setback requirement. (Exhibit 4, Site Photo) However, having two
garages in two completely separate locations on the property would likely alter the
character of this property and the neighborhood. The expense of construction a new
garage in this location would also increase as a separate driveway would required to be
poured. According to Section 26-501.131. of the City Code, the first 25 feet of the
driveway from property line on to the property must be surfaced with concrete, asphalt,
brick pavers or other similar hard surfaced material.
Construction of the garage in the proposed location requires a variance but is a logical
location based on the functions and the location of other uses on the property. The
garage will use the existing driveway to gain access. Mature landscaping and the
topography of the property also provide relief from visual impacts the garage may have
from the right-of-way and neighboring properties. (Exhibit 5, Site Photos); By allowing
the variance it will further increase the value of the property and further enhance a
property that is well maintained
The proposed garage will also be built of quality construction and will match the existing
home and garage. It will be tied into the existing garage using the same brick, shingles
and other materials. (Exhibit 6, Building Elevations)
A storage shed currently exists in the location of the proposed garage which will need to
be moved to a new location on the property. (Exhibit 7, Site Photo) If the shed is kept its
relocation will require a permit and will also be required to meet all setbacks in its new
location.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
In order to approve an administrative variance, the Director must determine that the
majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have
been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the applications compliance with
the variance criteria. (Exhibit 8) Staff provides the following review and analysis of the
variance criteria.
1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service
or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by
regulation for the district in which it is located.
If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable
return. The property currently has a single family home with attached garage on
it and it may remain and be used in this manner regardless of outcome of the
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
variance request. If denied, the applicant could still construct a garage on the lot
but it would need to be in a different location where it would comply with the
development standards for an R-1 zoned lot.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
If the request were granted, the character of the locality would most likely not be
altered. The property is located in a residential area with large lots that allow for
single family residential structures and uses that are accessory to the residential
structure. The garage would be an accessory use allowed by the zoning code. In
addition the garage will be constructed to match the existing home and garage to
further minimize the impacts of its presence. Mature landscaping and the
topography of the area will also help to provide screening of the garage.
Variances have also been granted in the area to allow for lessened side and rear
yard setbacks as well.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this
application, which would not be possible without the variance.
The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property. If the
applicant was not requesting a side yard variance, an attached, single car garage
would not be able to be constructed because the garage would be too small for a
vehicle.
Alternate locations for a detached garage that meet the R-1 development
standards are possible without requesting a variance but the alternate locations are
impractical.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon
the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of
the regulations were carried out.
There are no unique conditions related to shape or topography that render any
portion of the property in question unbuildable. The property is trapezoidal in
shape and gently slopes toward W. 33`d Ave. and there are alternate locations on
the property in which a garage that meets the development standards could be
constructed.
Administrative Variance 4
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
The request for relief from the regulations is more of an inconvenience than a
hardship.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person
presently having an interest in the property.
The hardship described above relates to the location of the proposed structure
with respect to the existing home and its setbacks. It also relates to the location of
the existing structure due to its increased 30 foot side yard setback. Since the lot
was platted and the home was constructed prior to the current owner having an
interest in the property, the hardships have not been created by the owner.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in
which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or
permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or
increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or
substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the
neighborhood.
Staff does believe the request would not be detrimental to public welfare and
would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It may have a
positive impact on property values in the area. It would not hinder or impair the
development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light
would not be compromised as a result of this request.
The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it increase
the danger of fire. It also wouldn't cause an obstruction to motorists on the
adjacent streets and would not impede the sight distance triangle.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request
are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
There are no unique or unusual circumstances present in the neighborhood that
are also present on the property that necessitate the need for a variance.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a
person with disabilities.
Single family homes and their accessory structures are not required to meet
building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities.
Staff finds this criterion is not applicable.
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set
forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual.
The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two
family dwelling units.
Staff finds this criterion is not applicable.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the applicable
review criteria, staff recommends APPROVAL of a 7.5 foot side yard setback
variance to the 15 foot side yard setback requirement.
Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that
would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends approval for
the following reasons:
1. The side setback variance would not alter the character of the
neighborhood.
2. The lot has two frontages requiring increased setbacks which creates
limited placement options for the garage.
3. There will be no negative impact to the public welfare or other properties
in the area.
4. The request would not substantially increase the congestion in public
streets, increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety.
5. There have been no protests submitted during the ten-day public
notification period.
6. The applicant is proposing an investment in the property.
With the following conditions:
The garage must be complimentary in building material and architectural
style to the home subject to staff review and approval through review of a
building permit.
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
E
m`
14 J,
89
. z,.,
Z
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
7
LAND SURVEY
OF A FORTEON OFTHRNORTHMW Ip OF SECTTO
TOWNSHIP3 SCUM, RANGE69 WEST' OF THE 6TH
COON) OF JEFFERSON, SPATE OF COLORADO.
-N
10 0 10 20
SCALE: 1"=20'
'
3 PIPE.
0ONO SET 1" GRASS Q.IOp
Q~ WASIX!R,
W 3g rs¢rs3zl ~ Q/~,n-`p0 ~
` LOT 68
°O
NOTE! LOT 67
a ENCROACHES i.m
O Q9 n
63D 9 ti
9~,,. i `
FOUNDELTl 34'
Kpb~ r
NEEAR.
CAP.
L90 M21 NOTE:
(/2
NCHOACH'5S LF
I R'~1(y6. 4 bp' 1 ~ b
STO
V6 LOT 65
4
I 4A''.fr
p c KTOA
r OTC" ~~F4INMR ` SET i;P°IU
`FJ a $p > YP~O '~11 ..X19 /L5415121
s` 1+ _ '1TNU y
rl > r' ~
r} @q - RCS°' N its` 'I s'j
CO±SC.O
35
/ n2 Q
S NOTE:
SHADEDA
JS LANDSC
HYADJACI
PROPFRTY
LS4 5B° REHAILCAP,/
LSb'
15371
i
Exhibit 2
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
LOT 66
8
111, N v,~ m.g p ' r J 11 .ro r
rTa^,F~b/
ll 1 J i n, jy r'
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
dE'
l
~ ~
y
d
.#r~{x,
y
~lr> r
w "W +
Administrative Variance
10
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
4-11
x
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
Administrative Variance 11
Car+iP~st'rE ' _ ca rtiP~s: K. 51-t ~.~:.LS f Riuoewl em.y ou e o smura I 1
b .
k i Ii 1 Qjpfa2D 5iDi
saga. it A 1 .i sc. < 1
I +
~ ~ - F-•.~c ees~c. - o.sv=.•r I iC> 7v1 Yi-~-S
t I
- I i
i
W E_ T - _ F L 6 V 1 O f J
FBI
- raps ec.<c/
D2 Qs. i2oe r= T F sI RIMA 2C0 j
E
IRVI NM.THOMS E: J-ARCHITECT to/pypp j
WHE QI OG E, COLOQA 00 I
L GRAMYG AIJ.
IN'
~726~IGGLGE eT.
_ izci
Exhibit 7
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-06/Marsh
13
Timothy Marshav
3 e.
3
10370 heat Ridge, Co
W
80033
July 21, 2008
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 W. 29 ave.
Wheat Ridge. Co.
80033
sire,
Listed below is the response for the evaluation of the variance I am submitting.
A. The reasonable return in use would allow me to build an additional single garage attached to the existing ga-
ge whioh ocuid accommodate another vehicle. garage would "match" the
B 70he essenti caracter of the would not change as the design of the
existing house h garage. The bi k land singles would be the some and the location dalong the south side of the
house would not interfere with the adjoining property. I have attached photos to show the location.
Without the var anceethe width of the garage would be to narrow to fit another eh cle and allow the
a value. investment
doors to open. line D. wou d only a low a 12foot total building wreuires a 15 foot set back from the south side idth which after walls and insulation, a ehiclepwouldinot fit into t the
garage.
E. The only hardship is the R-1 zoning that requires a 15 foot set back. This is not a unique hardship that another
width of
the
person would have any interest in. set-
wou
. This
fee
back
the F. The administrative variance would alvlow the
is I mated byta be a dtvery la ge Ipine tree. The garage height gar-age
to 18 feet. The neighboring ring property
would not impair the neighborhood as it will be the the same height as the house and attached garage. At-
tached are elevation drawings. There would be no public safety, fire, congestion or property value issues.
attached and detached garages
G This is not a
area and unique I suspect vaiance were reqestd for a height and a number set -backs.
in the
Sincerely yours,
Tim Marsh
EXHIBIT 8
Residential Worksheet
Address: O 76 W 3,~ 0-9- 1
Zoning: Property in the flood plain?
Lot Size: 7S3 sq. ft. Lot Width: U40 12 2?
Maximum Lot Coverage: Z S %
Proposed Improvements:
House: sq. ft.
Addition to House: 3 sq. ft.
Shed:
Detached Garage:
l , ~3~r2tSrsq. ft.
Existing Improvement(s):
House: Z , dZ sq. ft.
Shed: sq. ft.
sq. ft. Detached Garage:
sq. ft. Other: sq. ft.
Proposed Lot Coverage: (Total) /G.4 % Z 019' t!i sq. ft.
Required Setbacks: FR
3-0
S S ~ r
R /
Provided Setbacks: FR
5-'
S S Y6,6
R 7.7
Maximum Height: ft.
Proposed Height: A, 2 ft.
Maximum Size:
Proposed Size:
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
Access Notes
For one and two-family dwellings, the first 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site
shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar materials.
For all uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer than 25' to any
property line, except when used as joint access for two or more lots.
In residential zone districts, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 feet in width.
One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the street accesses are at least 30 feet
apart, measured from the interior edges.
For all uses, one access point per property is permitted.
Landscaping Notes
For one-and two-family dwellings, one tree for every 70 feet of street frontage is required.
100% of the front yard and 25% of the entire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance of C.O.
Street trees required: - Street trees provided: 1--~
i
V
sl AI
City of
Wheat -Midge
POSTING CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. WA-08-06/Marsh
DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS: August 8, 2008
I f o Tl~ ~l. a-RQ iA
(name)
residing at -7 0 W_ 3 3 ASE
(address)
as the applicant for Case No. WA-08-06 , hereby certify that I have posted the sign for
Public Notice at 10370 W. 33`d Ave.
(location)
on this f day of w G y S't 20 e V , and do hereby certify that
said sign has been posted and remained in place for ten (10) days prior to and including the
deadline for written comments regarding this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on
the map below. p
Si e:
NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Community Development Department for this case
and will be placed in the applicant, s case file.
MAP
eb Ae
City of
°6, Whea-tlkdge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE
July 30, 2008
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA-08-06, a request for approval of a 7.5 foot
rear yard setback variance from the 15 foot rear yard setback requirement resulting
in a 7.5 foot rear yard setback on property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and
located at 10370 W. 33`d Avenue.
The applicant is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no
more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning
Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a
decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request by
certified mail.
If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or
if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in
writing by 5:00 p.m. on August 8, 2008.
Thank you.
WA0806.doc
www.ci.wheatridge.co.us
5E 21
_l
m
3
z
N
Lcq
3
z
a
R
f
OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP
WHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
5E 28
PARCEULOT BOUNDARY
(DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP)
WATER FEATURE
* DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
NE 28
0 100 200 300 AOO Feet
wxur
m DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001
MARSH TIMOTHY F 39-281-20-002
ROWEJOANNE M 7008 0150 0003 4502 5848
10370 33RD AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 5613
MELONAKIS JUNE C
WAMBEKE WENDELL P
WAMBEKE LESLIE F
6497 QUAKER CT
ARVADA CO 80007 7568
39-281-20-001
7008 0150 0003 4502 5831
FISH W B
FISH PATRICIA A
10340 W 33RD AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 5613
CAMPBELL CARMELINE D
TRUSTEE
10375 W 33RD AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 5612
LANG ANNE F
MERRITT STEPHEN M
10395 W 33RD AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 5612
HAMPF STEVEN D
HAMPF COLEEN
3295 MILLER ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 5652
HONAMAN GLENN E
HONAMAN LYNN W
3275 MILLER ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 5652
JACKSON JOHN D
JACKSON JANET J
3225 MILLER ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 5652
39-281-20-003
39-281-19-017
39-281-19-018
39-281-15-003
39-281-15-002
39-281-99-008
7008 0150 0003 4502 5824
7008 0150 0003 4502 5817
7008 0150 0003 4502 5800
7008 0150 0003 4502 57-94_-----
7008 0150 0003 4502 5787
7008 0150 0003 4502 5770
WA-08-06/March Adm. Notice 7/30/08-8/08/08 8
a'I
N
n
N
M
W
~ Q
Q 0
w O
(D NO LC7 N d' NO co NO N O ~ O ! z
O C
O Q
/.I / Q
Case No.: A0806 _ Quarter Section Map No.: NE2~8~~
App: Last Name: Marsh Related Cases:
App: First Name: imothy Case History: 7.5 foot rear yard setback
ariance
Owner: Last Name: M_ arsh/Rowe.
Owner: First Name: imothy/Joanne -
App Address: 10370 W. 33rd Ave. Review Body: V dm.
_..y
City, State Zip: heat Ridge, CO 80033
App: Phone: 303-238-5088 APN: 39-281-20.002
Owner Address: s ame 2nd Review Body: I
City/State/Zip: I ! 2nd Review Date: I-
Owner Phone: ame Decision-making Body: F
Project Address: 10370 Approval/Denial Date:
Street Name: est 33rd Avenue
City/State, Zip: Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. Reso/Ordinance No.: F
Case Disposition: Conditions of Approval:
Project Planner: letz.. District: III
File Location: ctive Date Received: 7/21/2008_..
Notes: r~
Pre-App Date:
Follow-Up:
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
07/21/08 2:05 PM edha
Timothy F. Marsh
RECEIPT NO:CDA000550 AMOUNT
FM8D ZONING APPLICATION F 200.00
zone
PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT
CI( 6429 200.00
TOTAL 200.00
0
~i
a
a
R
h
b
a
t".
as
W
w
0
H
w
w
"O
m
.fl
U
L
d
,J7
U
y c 3 oo y ti q E"' a v L o C7
Eb 5,
v C C H m ai °SL' « R a b? ro B d
Q ro R d m a o y. Sa y oo m a m
p U L' w T N R of r O o a+ " p 0 n O' to a Q N H
0
F }A}..~~ •y o m o y C chi m F U_ Q m
W H .r^7' id .O R U N R N m ~~ii J T
3 m R O r > O~ 5 4 S V m G ro
M W.c o U O o roovp•oA o v Z~J d c7
R~ w6 c 40
to
o m to `cb'w cbD' v > 'a Q LL w AL
o v «o x~. m e .S " eu L ro" m ai U Q U 0o u
E"' 3' ao v« a- .o G L uo ro a v o w > 2 H W o
o°o.S«ro Y~ dc-R~ Lo g o o p oG F- E
oL o 7 P eMn a o E -o
G
„To„a `o° om ~ro o a ~x o o ❑ rw° N °o
d G G 0 ' td ~ C w F L N U n > h y N
00 M dq
°R i U v v w E 0 0 C sue. m °L' ro cNi
W Eo c y no ~ y~ v° - 0
A ro S o:caTi« a ~yo ~~xsa,g`°R.oy; A~ o°n « T
0 3> R ❑ c 3 R n a z ro R
p O U G L ~ ~ R y N~_~ p w N ro
m ° c~~ 3 G~ aLi " v«~ c A m N v N
~jR a w a d ❑ i° o ❑ R 'y R •o ro> o > m
n ~ `~..i ~ ~ N bD E 'O C d O i3 'J' R R ttl R R -O N ~y R y ~ N
R aLiva > ~ 3ro ~ ~•aro~ ~ °'x ~-S p h 'S v 0
O y a''b 'd Q 3 ro~ 6'n N o '0 3 ,b w K 3 w .ono ~ ~
00
F4
00 0 0 .o
75 H~ ~5b 0" 0o H R L O
zN « g❑
N , ` w0 m R U O V y O. D N R ro sR. O
O V] d N O O N UJ ro L co R- r w F L O .S 00 74
N G R is O w O P E" p ti h X U Q y R N U R R U d d .S R y
cn -0
e h G' v n> c a. x M a W m m w0 3 'o
d R a ~c"'a'r~. o W ~ ~ro Sv0 R.. °'c +°-aO .d c ~ rx Y d o a
w W y,~ TLO ryi U F Cri 4l R •U Rro R U ~ .b
m Z fn A O a v « m v ro nn v
s", cn m[Y, •o is¢ p o o m .o yA•~ 3'ra in B a.a S" O m
~ Lo Ro o hd~vw~ T a~R~dv~oE:'.dro~ s❑ p G a
F o°o v~ a-1 m x Oa ~ n o 'fl m~ m ~ o d m~ R L o w R ~ ~ ~ U O ~ ~ o
A T O Wz A> w OU O o w h w v aoi a"i F O H c°o S
A L U «U U H o o v wo vi ~ o ~c C~ ~ m y~ .rl .S w° E T a a"i ~b m'~. ~ ~ W A z w v", O
~ C7 a~ o aS a~ o v > a~ ~o ❑ a~ O ~ O m ~ 'o ~ L .7 o a~
v'« Ev .ter 3'"ro m o o:°. o E,•o v ~[.•~ro 3 >~"ro h °o m o R api
F H o Fi o °o row° aU .5« Y ro R A n. aaH eo W eu HO
U) U H F
0
o ~
z^
vs
w~
A
3
a
d
3
F WHEgT
h~~ Pip LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
u m Community Development Department
7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Phone (303) 235-2846
COZO R A00 (Please print or type all information)
Applicant *7-ana-rd y A11-2S11 Address 105X9 GfJ- 3,3'IYAI6 PhoneOP3"ap e
City&AQr eJAA,,, State do Zip ee5W,-13 Fax
Owner7/f/JpTl9r/ A~1A/LS/~ /,~DAd1lE/Cy~ss 3>7~ Phone
City State Zip Fax
Contact T/l ml/ /1ff% 51% Address --2A7n6- Phone
City State Zip Fax
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written
communication to applicant and owner.)
Location of request (address): /d37G l~ • !J ' E E E O[ C/.kJ
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit
❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
XLot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation
❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign
❑ Site Development Plan approval ❑ Variance/Waiver (from Section )
❑ Other:
Detailed description of request: 94,6i &S.74 4ZW i2lFlL~~ 7Z3 !LG/> J -
';~ET~ FiPOir 7~ ~~Gl/il~ Q~na~PrL/ /[1s7~r1~ of
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Number: X474.5- aPr;7/.Ze 7E Size of Lot (acres or square footage): r y
Current Zoning: tZ I Proposed Zoning: /110 46r
Current Use: rRiI/Ap35 ii'ES11)EiJt~ Proposed Use: A10 en2f a c;
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-attor ey~frrom the owner which approved of this action on his behalf.
Signature of Applic ` ram`
Subscribed and sworn to me this '*A7 day of f20 6$
GREGO=PUBLIC NOo Pt lie
STATMy comt~rission expires
To b
e filled out by staff: O. r
Date received Fee $ X6 (70 R~j ceipt No.C~~d Case No. t~ ~~~r0
Comp Plan Desig. Zoning /C-lK Quarter Section Map ~1k
Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager
N
10 0 10 20
SCALE:~
FOUND BENT 3/4"
PIPE, SET 518"
REBAR/CAP,
LS#15321 /
30,p..
>US
\ 30v'
,p
rO~
J
0
w
4
N
P
LAND SURVEY PLAT
OF A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 28,
TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6111 P.M.,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
LEGAL DESCR
LC
FOUND
3/4" PIPE\
30538. /
_ Q-3a5 ~ yA~'
LOT 70
04 P`I> / ✓ FOUND \ \
\
..lCl FOUND 3/4" PIPE
l6O 1" 314" PIPE 4
LOT 69 CERTIFICATI(
SET C' GRASS
p, WASHER h R(
LS# 15321\ COLORAD
V~ LOT 68.
,,5350
op0e
tj6303
YgNl
/ 4 4~ 6p3
o
~
ME OR UN
AND THAI
- - \
•r - CONFORM
NOTE: ° LOT 67 \
DRIVEWAY
ENCROACHES 1.0' \ \ Op~_
\~a 6 0
4/
#1G33,tOR~
364 LOT 65
10
4S
SO
.
4 p PLANTER
n[l EXISTING
5N - FENCES
QR04OS~1a p / t~ /
/J/~~x 6393G~~
l 5
cod`' /
SET 518" REBAR/CAP, \
LS#15321
SHADED AREA LOT 66
IS LANDSCAPED
BY ADJACENT
PROPERTY
/ NOTE:
WALK
/ ENCROACHES 1.8'
c1 *
SEP 5/8". REBARCAP,
LS#15321
NOTE
1. "N(
ANY
WITH
IN NC
SURN
OF TI
2. BE
3. OF
4. AD
5. TH
PRI
COJ
INDE]
DEPO
IN BC
RIGH
NUM]
LEGEND:
O-SET 518" REBAR/CAP OR
V BRASS WASHER,
LS15321 AS INDICATED
P- PLATTED DISTANCE OR
DIRECTION
M- MEASURED DISTANCE OR
DIRECTION.
L- PER LEGAL DESCRIPTION
IPTION: -
T 65, OVERLOOK ESTATES, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
)N: ,
)BERT E. PORT A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF
D DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED BY
DER MY DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY, SUPERVISION AND CHECKING
IN MY OPINION, BASED OI~3BQF41~,~TON PROVIDED TO ME, IT
S TO COLORADO LAW.
-p =
153
ROBERT E PORT, LS#15321
S:
)TICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE
LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY
IN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH. DEFECT.
1 EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS
EY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE
IF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON."
UUNGS ARE BASED ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF OVERLOOK ESTATES
IGINAL LEGAL WAS PROVIDED BY CLIENT.
DITIONAL CONTROL MAY HAVE BEEN USED THAT IS NOT SHOWN.
I WORD "CERTIFY" AS SHOWN AND USED HEREON MEANS AN EXPRESSION OF
)FESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THE FACTS OF THE SURVEY AND DOES NOT
ISTITI ITS A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
(ING STATEMENT:
SITED THISDAY OF 20 ,AT _.M,
OK OF THE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S SURVEY/
P OF WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE(S) RECEPTION
IER
COUNTY SURVEYOR/DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR
R.E. PORT
LAND SURVEYING
JOBNO: 88-5858 DATE: 06-20-2008
CLIENT: MARSH REVISED: 07-08-2008
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 10370 W. 33RD AVENUE
R.E.PoRT&ASSDCIATES,WC.5E WARDRD.N160.ARVMA,COB 2303420-0'/88FA-303A2 59
i
1.