Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWZ-97-10' RUC 14 .' 7 03~10PM PRCIF ICR OLD I(YG CO. 303 220 5585 ~3 235 2857 Aug-_14-,y/ '~1="LyH ~vrccvrrax G~TM}C~ity of ADMINI51'fiATIVB pgOCSSS APPyICATYON "~"eft Department of Piannin5 and Developm 80033 -it1d~ 75Q0 West 2 Phoney (3~~ 237-69Q4 ~ Co Applicant Pacifica Holdin Com an way= Pacifica Development Properties, II, O~gr LLC, successor in interest to P.2i2 P_O2 Location of request 70 Executive Center, xnvw„ a~ --~- - Type of action rsquested (Check one or more of the actions ii9ted below which pertain to Your request.) Change of zone yr zone ooT~el~+s Site development plan app Special use Permiermit Conditional use p ermit Temporary use/building p Mirror subdivision _ Subdivision 8 Preliminary Final Q *r See attached procedural guide for specific requirements. Detailed Description of request varianea~Waive<r Nonconfozming use change plood plain Special`exception Interpretation of code Zone line mpdificatian Public Imprpvement £xcaption Street vacatiort Miscellaneous plat Solid waste landfill/ mineral extraction pez'mit Q Other A change of zone from C-1 to a Planned Development List all persons and companies lesseeldoptionee~eetcin the described real property ag owner, mortgagee, 5350 S. Roslyn St., iZ40,•Engle,!ood, CO 80111, 220-5565 PHON£ NAME ~pRESS- a ifica ARKA/Kialino-i-70 LLC-- .... in tote rest to ___ ec~_eace Lessee: Citywiae aanK, ~••~~• ~••• -------• I certify that the information and exhibits herewith subtaitteri are true an knowledge and that in filing this application, I correct to the best of my be accotgpiished. eta acting with the knowl®dge and cosssent of those persons listed,a ve, without whose consent the requested notion cannot lawi~liy Applicants other than owners must sub~ait power-of-attorn from the owner which aPPr~ed Of this action o~ his ~}e a Signature of Applicant Subscribed and sworn to me 19 SEAL My commission expisgs ~~ Cage No. ____~~_------ No.~~- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215 SHEET ~ PROJECT FILE ~_ LOCATION FEATURE DESIGNED BY DATE ~___ _. ~ i ._ .. r . ! -___. ~q ~ a Y'~ INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER _ Council Bill No. ORDINANCE NO. Series of 1997 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF REZONING FROM COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON LAND LOCATED AT 9500 WEST 49TH AVENUE, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, THAT: ec ' n 1 Upon application by Pacifica Holding Company LLC for approval of a rezoning in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Case No. WZ-97-10 and pursuant to findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, Wheat Ridge maps aze hereby amended to exclude from the Commercial-One district, and to include in the Planned industrial Development district the following described land: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of 70 Executive Center Amended Subdivision, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Section 2 Conditions. 1. The following uses aze allowed: All RCl, R-C and C-1 uses except the following: Adult entertainment facilities, automobile and light-duty truck sales and rental, auto service and repair shops, hotels and motels, mortuaries and crematories, motor fueling stations, drive-in restaurants, rooming and boazding houses, lumber yards, pawn shops, taverns and night clubs, theaters. Additional permitted uses: Research laboratories, retail and wholesale sales of equipment, supplies and materials for use in agricultural, mining industry, business, transportation, building and construction, school for industrial or business training, printing and engraving, wholesale businesses, manufacturing, processing and warehousing, light industrial operations, warehousing with light vehicular traffic, building contractors service shop. 2. No regular long term parking of semi-trucks and trailers be allowed. 3. No outside storage be allowed. 4. Any use not permitted under the Commercial-One and not listed under the additional light industrial, cannot occur between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.. 5. Any use in excess of 35 HP in the two most eastern buildings be reviewed on a case-by case basis by Staff. 6. In the two western buildings, any use in excess of 40 HP will not be allowed without Staff's discretion. 7. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., to outside walls or roof will be permitted. 8. Eliminate uses listed on the plan under #8. 9. No woodworking businesses will be allowed. Ordinance No. _ _ Page 2 Section 3. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this rezoning does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26(c) of Appendix A of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 4. ~afet~ Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is ' promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 5. Severabilitv. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be judged by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgement shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder of this ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances. ec io 6. This ordinance shall take effect days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of _ to _ on this _ day of 1997, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and corisideration on final passage set for , 1997, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of _ to _, this _ day of , 1997. _ SIGNED by the Mayor on this _ day of ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk 1997. DAN WILDS, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY GERALD DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY 1st Publication: 2nd Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE ~ WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6773 (303) 234-5900 Wh e at City Admin. Fax ~ 234-5924 Police Dept., Fax # 235-2949 Ridge TO: Accounting Department FROM: Agnes Thoma RE: Refund for 4865 Estes Street DATE: August 14, 1997 Please refund $39.07 to Avery Construction, 8310 Auburn Lane, Westminster, CO 80030 They applied for and were issued a permit for the above referenced address which is in unincorporated Jefferson County. The breakdown is as follows: Permit fee: $30.25 Tax: 8.82 TOTAL $39.07 A copy of the building permit is attached. Thanks. CJ RECYCLED PAPER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge City Council on September 8, 1997, at 7:00 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. WZ-97-10: An application by Pacifica Holding Company, L.L.C., for Pacifica Development Properties, II, LLC, for approval of a Planned Industrial Development final development plan and plat with a a vaziance. Said property is located at 9500 West 49th Avenue and is legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of 70 Executive Center Amended Subdivision, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. 2. Case No. ZOA-97-8: An application by the City of Wheat Ridge to consider a proposed amendment to the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Chapter 26, Zoning Code relating to residential densities and development standazds. Case No. WPA-97-1: An application by the City of Wheat Ridge to consider proposed amendments to the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Development Plan relating to residential densities and development standards and the Future Land Use Map for residential development. ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be Published: August 29, 1997 Transcript NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Heazing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge PLANNING COMMISSION on August 21, 1997, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.. All interested citizens aze invited to speak at Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heazd: 1. Case No WZ-97-9• An application by Josephine Johnston for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One to Residential-One A for property located at 4313 Jellison Street. 2. Case No MS-97-3: An application by Josephine Johnston for the approval of a two-lot minor subdivision for property located at 4313 Jellison Street. Said property is subject to rezoning review pursuant to Case No. WZ-97-9. The following legal description pertains to both Case Nos. 1 and 2 above. BEGINNING AT THE WEST'/, CORNER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. FROM WHICH THE SW CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS S00°09'23 "E A DISTANCE OF 2651.89 FEET AND ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE N89°26'53"W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SW QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 346.06 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N00°06'46"W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE JANET D. MINOR SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 84.32 FEET TO A POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NUMBER 93094871 RECORDED IN THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO; THENCE N79°04'23 "E ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 271.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JELLISON STREET; THENCE S00° 12'37"W ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 195:08 FEET; THENCE S89°38'26"W, A DISTANCE OF 265.71 FEET; THENCE N00°06'46"W ALONG THE . .....W.EST LINE OF THE JANET D. MINOR SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 60.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 45,293 SQUARE FEET OR 1.0398 ACRES MORE ORLESS. 3. asC- e Igo ~Z-97=10: An application by Pacifica Holding Company, LLC, for Pacifica Development Properties, II, LLC, for approval of a rezoning from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an outline development plan and a fmal development plan and plat with vaziances. Said property is located at 9500 W. 49th Avenue and is legally described as follows: LOTS I, 2, 3, AND 4 OF 70 EXECUTIVE CENTER AMENDED SUBDIVISION, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 4. Case No. ZOA-97-3: An application by the City of Wheat Ridge for approval of an amendment to Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws pertaining to historic landmarks and trees. ~'t\ 0.~\d~C'\~\U.nn VlA CRC Maril n ,. Recording Se tary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be published: August 1, 1997 Wheat Ridge Transcript ~~ l~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby ,given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge PLANNING COMMIS- SION on August 21, 1997, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at Public Hearing or submit written comments. The .fol- ~ lowing petitions shall be heard__ _ __ ___ __ 3. -Case No WZ-97-10: An applica- 4ion by Pacifica Holding Company, LLC, for Pacifica Development Properties, If, LLC, for approval of a rezoning from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an outline development plan and a final development plan and plat with vari- ances. Said property is located at 9500 W. 49th Avenue and is legally described as follows: LOTS 1, 2, 3, AND 4 OF 70 EXECU- TIVE CENTER AMENDED SUBDIVI- SION, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. Marilyn Gunn by mlc Marilyn Gunn, Recording Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang _ Wanda Sang, City Clerk Wheat Ridge Transcript 4051.97 Published August_1~ 1997 _____. ___ i - - - ~~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE . PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: August 21, 1997 CASE NO.B NAME: WZ-97-10/Pacifica GATE PREPAREQ: August 14, 1997 CASE MANAGER: rJ,M/eredith Reckert ACTION REQUESTEDRezoning from C-1 to PID, outline plan approval and final development plan approval with a variance. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 9500 W. 49th Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): NAME 8 ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): APPROXIMATE AREA: 6.2 Acres PRESENT ZONING: Commercial-One Pacifica Holding Company LLC 5350 S. Roslyn St #240 Englewood, CO 80111 Pacifica ARKA/Kipling & I-70 LLC 5350 S. Roslyn St #240 Englewood, CO 80111 PRESENT LAND USE: Office, Showroom, Storage SURROUNDING ZONING: N: R-C; S: A-1; E: PRD, R-3; W: C-1 SURROUNDING LAND USE: N: office, low density residential; S: I-70; E: multifamily; W: office COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: Commercial Activity Center - Kipling Activity Center Master Ptan DATE PUBLISHED: August 1,1997 DATE POSTED: August 7, 1997 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: August 7, 1997 €NTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) (X) ZONING ORDINANCE lX) ~ SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 0 () OTHER CASE FILE 8 PACKET MATERIALS SLIDES EXHIBITS JURISDICTION: The properly is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and al! notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there jurisdiction to hear this case. ~~ ! ~ Plannins Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica I. REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a rezoning on property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development and for an outline development plan and a final development plan with a sign setback variance. The property in question was recently developed under C-I zoning with four office/showTOOm/storage buildings totaling 106,524 squaze feet. Certificates of occupancy have been issued for the anchor tenant, a bank, in the southwestern-most structure on the property and two other tenants. The developer has requested the rezoning to delete currently allowed C-1 uses which are undesirable and to expand the allowed uses to include some low impact, semi-industrial businesses. The required platting document was previously approved pursuant to Case No. MS-95-4. This was approved prior to issuance of a building permit. Case No. WZ-97-~ was a request by this applicant for approval of a rezoning from C-1 to PCD with a similaz list of allowed uses and the same final development plan. This request was approved with conditions by Planting Commission at a public hearing held on June 5, 1997. Prior to the public hearing in front of City Council on July 28, 1997, Staff and the applicant were informed by the City Attorney that this was an invalid application as some of the uses being requested were not allowed in the Planned Commercial District, only in the Planned Industrial District. At the City Council hearing, the applicant was given the option of reducing the list of proposed uses so that the truly industrial uses were eliminated or withdrawing the application. The applicant chose to withdraw the then current application and reapplied for a new request calling out the proposal as a Planned Industrial District. II. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Anoriginal meeting for neighborhood input was held on February 6, 1997. Those attending include the following: Meredith Reckert -staff Mike Kendall -applicant Charlene Hoffman - 9340 W. 49th Avenue #207 Bob Stafford - 2500 Van Gordon Lou Ficco - 11315 West 38th Avenue Tony Ficco - 12425 West 38th Avenue Tantmy and Jantes Raake - 9240 West 49th Avenue #313 Elvis Tippets - 960 West 49th Avenue Concerns addressed included the following: • Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica ' _ The feeling that the developer had misrepresented the intent of the project because zoning is C-1 but the type of buildings which were built lend themselves to industrial type uses. Now, afrer the fact the developer is amending the zoning to fit the building, instead of designing the buildings to correspond with the zoning on the property - A concern for opening up the azea to industrial uses where there aze currently none in the close vicinity _ Atty plans for buffering for the adjacent multi-family residential development since the buildings aze 5' from the eastern property line _ Will outside storage be allowed? _ Why not keep the C-1 zoning and apply for special uses as needed on a case-by-case basis - .Concern for negative affects on adjacent commercial and residential -heavy truck traffic, potential for dangerous waste products, etc. The neighborhood meeting for the new app}ication (Planned Industrial Development) was held on August 7, 1997. Those attending included the following: Sean McCartney -staff Mike Kendall -applicant Tim Rogers -applicant Mazolyn L. Rogers - 4400 Independence Hts., Evergreen, CO Bob Stafford - 2500 Van Gordon Street, Lakewood, CO The following issues were discussed: -That the new development could protect the surrounding neighbors from the noise generated by I- 70. -That potential exhaust and noise pollution from the proposed industrial uses should be mitigated by the performance standards included on the plan. III. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT The outline development plan establishes design standards including a 24' height restriction for the main structure, 15' minimum landscaped coverage and building coverage not to exceed 35% of the site area. Allowed uses include all C-1 uses with the exception of undesirable businesses such as adult entertainment facilities, auto repair businesses, lumber yards and bazs. Other permitted uses taken from the C-2 and I zones include wholesale businesses, light manufacturing and a contractor's office and shop. The maximum horsepower limitation is listed as 35 HP for the eastern buildings and 40 HP in the western buildings for any machine being used on the premises. However, there would be the availability to increase the horsepower limitation at the discretion of the Planning an~ Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-l0/Pacifica Development Director. A potential tenant using machines with greater horsepower than these maximums could be approved as long as this business could conform to the performance standazds referenced on this document. Staff is uncomfortable with this provision being left open ended and would recommend the maximum be limited to a specific horsepower. If a horsepower greater than 35 and 40 HP is being requested, a special use permit could be pursued. All requirements for a Planned Commercial Development outline development plan have been met. IV. REZONING CRITERIA In accordance with Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Sec. 26-6(C.), before a change of zone is approved, the applicant shall show and City Council shall find: 1. That the change of zone is in conformance, ar will bring the property into conformance with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, Comprehensive Land Use plan and other related policies or plans for the area. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as being within the Kipling Activity Center Master Plan area. The specific land use classification is "Office/Retail" which would allow a mix of uses including retail, service and office. There is no mention of allowing industrial uses in the areas designated as "Office/Retail". Farther to the north, the land is shown as "Business Pazk" which , would allow light industrial uses such as the Stazguide facility which was recently rezoned and built. This is a high tech manufacturing facility with a horsepower limitation of 20. For the.reason stated above, Staff must conclude that the submittal as proposed, is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, Staff believes there are many high tech manufacturing uses which aze not allowed in Cortunercial-One but have no impact on adjacent property. 2. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. Adjacent land use and zoning surrounding the property include an office building with C-1 zoning to the west. To the northwest is an office building which has C-1 zoning with PID zoning and uses further to the northwest. Abutting the property to the north is R-C zoning with a mix of office and low density residential use with PCD zoning to the north of this row of properties. Multi-family residential development with R-3 zoning (apartments) and Planned Residential Development zoning (condominiums) are located directly to the east. 3, That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change off zone. There will economic benefits to the community as a result of the rezoning. 4. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All service agencies are currently providing service to the property. 5. That the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, create drainage problems, or seriously reduce light and air to adjacent properties. The change of zone will not affect drainage or the amount of light and air to adjacent properties. The buildings will remain regazdless of zoning on the property. Performance standazds were required by Staff to mitigate other potential impacts, particularly to residents to the east. 6. That the property cannot reasonably be developed under the existing zoning conditions. There aze a wide variety of uses allowed under the existing C-1 zoning, however, the developer will have more flexibility in placing tenants with the expanded use list. 7. That the rezoning will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. As there is other industrial zoning in the azea, spot zoning is not an issue. 8. That there is a void in an area or community need that the change of zone will fill by providing for necessary services, products or facilities especially appropriate at the location, considering available alternatives. Based on comments from the City's Economic Development Coordinator, there is a void in the market for this type of leasable space in Jefferson County. V. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN A final development plan has been submitted which is consistent with the outline development plan building pazameters and which accurately reflects what has been built. All minimum requirements of the C-I zone have been met or exceeded. The exception is the eastern building setbacks which were allowed under the old definitions of "building height" in relation to reestablishing setbacks. No information has been provided regazding signage on the property except for the sign at the southwest corner of the property. The elevation of the sign being proposed is included under Exhibit `B'. -The sign is 260 squaze feet in size and 24'11" in height. I[ is being shown as S' away from the right-of--way lines which requires a 5' setback vaziance discussed under Section VI. of this report. Staff is supporting the vaziance if this is the only freestanding sign allowed on the property. Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica All minimum requirements of zoning code have been met. All requirements for a final development plan have been met. VI. VARIANC); With this application, the applicant has included a request for a sign setback variance for the project identification sign. There was an original request, Case No. WA-97-3, for approval of a 25' sign setbac 3vo tanheeWheat allow a 30' high sign 5' from the front property line. Ptusuant to Section 26-410(e)( ) case w oheazdLand denied by the Boazd of Adjustment on Mazch 27k1997. street right-of-way. This This original request has been reduced by having the sign lowered to 24'-11" in height, thereby reducing the required setback from 30' to 10'. Therefore, a lesser setback variance of only 5' is needed, rather than the origina125'. The applicant has submitted jusetbtacks n ovided foruthosey Please refer to Exhibit 1 B"~ Sttaff wou d sized signs in the azea and the s p note that the sign was erectedwas all incu srvet The sign currently has a ~setbacklfromethe rfo-w development of the property line and will have to be relocated regazdless of the outcome of the case. Variances must be considered separately from the other cases and regand Secgtion 26-6(D)(2)• majority vote based upon Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Section 2-53(s). Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance: I. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, si rt on fortthe district in ,permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by raga which it is located? If the sign were relocated with a 10' setback, it would still be visible from I-70, however, it may be in a location which is not as aesthetically pleasing as the proposed location. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? Because the sign was erected without a permit, Staff concludes that the hazdship is self-imposed. 3. If the variation was granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? There aze many signs in this vicinity of similaz size with comparable setbacks. If the variance were granted it would not alter the chazacter of the azea. _ Planning Division Staff Report Case No. ~VZ-97-10/Pacifica 4. Would the particular physical surrounding shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? The site is relatively flat and there is an insufficient grade change between I-70 and the property to constirute a hazdship. The setback problem occurs because of the Independence/I-70 comer radius requirement and the applicant's need to place the sign perpendicular to the freeway for equal visibility from both the east and west. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Yes, however, there are already signs of comparable size and height in the azea with similar setbacks. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to mal;e.money out of the property? This request is economically motivated. The applicant has chosen the sign location based on the need for maximum exposure to I-70. 7. Has the alleged difficulty ar hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? J The developer has created his own hardship by erecting the sign without a permit. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? The sign is located outside of the sight distance triangle and does not pose a threat to public welfare. The proposed location is more aesthetically pleasing than an alternate location which meets the 10' setback. The applicant could be allowed two freestanding signs on the property as opposed to the single sign being proposed. For these reasons, Staff concludes that the variance would not be injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood? Because the request is for placement of a sign, not a building, approval of the variance will not. impair the supply of light and air to properties. As noted in #8, there should not be endangerment to the public's safety or a negative impact to property values in the vicinity. planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above, that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property o ublic fac'lihestand surrounding poroperty it is also found that public health and safety, p values would not be diminished or impaired, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or community, as distinguished vary n e`resulain ar easonable accommodation of a person wi h disabil ttesf the Staff has already concluded that granting of the variance would not be detrimental to property, improvements or real estate values in the neighborhood, nor would it hurt the health, safety and welfare. It could prove to be an improvement to the neighborhood aesthetically if no other freestanding signs were allowed on the property. It would not result in an accommodation to a person with disabilities. Staff concludes that although there aze no unique circumstances and the hazdship is self-imposed, there would be no endangerment to the public health, safety and welfaze if approved. If the variance is approved, it may result in a more aesthetically pleasing development. For these reasons, a recommendation of approval is given with the following conditions: 1, A building permit be applied for and issued prior to the existing sign being moved. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. VII. AGENCY REFERRALS All agencies aze currently serving the property. discouraged. eGaven the amount of glass used in the development the use of rock ould fac'Ihtated be vandalism after regular business hours. The Arvada Fire Protection District has expressed concern that some of the proposed uses could require building interior upgrades. Their specific comments have been forwazded to the applicant. VIII. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Planet A recommsendation of approval was made foGr the outline and final development plan for~the 1997. following reasons: 1. A rezoning is required to expand allowed uses as recommended by Staff which would allow a land use transition. Z, All requirements for a PCD outline development plan have been met. Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica With the following conditions: 1.. In the developmenYstandazds, the perimeter setback next to the right-of--way be changed to 50 feet. 2. No regulaz long term parking ofsemi-trucks and trailers be allowed. 3. No outside storage be allowed. 4. Any use not permitted under the Commercial-One and not listed under the additional light industrial, cannot occur between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.. 5. Any use in excess of 35 HP in the two most eastern buildings be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by Staff. . 6. In the two western buildings, any use in excess of 40 HP will not be allowed without Staff's discretion. 7. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifrs, etc., to outside walls or roof will be permitted. 8. Eliminate uses listed on the plan under #8. 9. No woodworking businesses will be allowed. All of the items have been incorporated into the outline and final plans with the exception of #7. The applicant has included a provision for no additional equipment being attached to walls but would like to reserve the right for attachment of additional equipment on the building roofs. There is already mechanical equipment attached to the roofs. In regazd to the sign setback variance, a recommendation of approval was made for the following reasons: .....1. Approval of the reduced request would not prove a hazard to the public health, safety and welfaze. ~ 2. It would not have a negative impact on property values or public welfaze. 3. Proposed location is more aesthetically pleasing than other locations meetings setbacks. With the following conditions: 1. Landscaping be installed around the base of the sign. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. All of these conditions of approval were incorporated into the new plan being reviewed by Planning Commission . IX. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff concludes that rezoning from C-1 to PID is required to allow the developer more flexibility in leasing tenant space. Staff further concludes that although industrial-type uses aze not specifically allowed in the "Office/Retail" definition in the Kipling Activity Center Master Plan, there-are some Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica C~ light industrial uses which aze appropriate for the azea if performance standards are used. Therefore, a recommendation of approval is given for the outline development plan with the following conditions; With the following conditions: 1. Semi-trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and deliveries only. 2. No shift work be allowed between the hours 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.. 3. The two most eastern buildings be limited to a 35 HP maximum for any one machine. 4. The two western buildings, be limited to a 40 HP maximum for any one machine. 5. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., to outside walls oripplwill be permitted. A recommendation of approval is given for the final development plan with the following conditions: 1. If the variance is approved, the plan be revised accordingly. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. In regazd to the request for variance, Staff has concluded that approval of the reduced request would not prove a hazard to the public health, safety and welfaze, nor would it have a negative impact on property values. Because the proposed location is more aesthetically pleasing than other locations meeting setbacks, a recommendation of Approval is given with the following conditions: 1. A building permit be applied for and issued prior to the existing sign being moved. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. X. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-97-10, a request for approval of rezoning from Cornmercial- One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an outline development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. A rezoning is required to expand allowed uses. 2. There aze some light industrial uses which are appropriate for the area if performance - standards are used. 3. All requirements for a PID outline development plan have been met. With the following. conditions: Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Paciftca 1. Semi-trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and deliveries only. 2. No shift work be allowed between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.. 3. The two most eastern buildings be limited to a 35 HP maximum for any machine. 4. The two western buildings be limited to a 40 HP maximum for any one machine. ~. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., to outside walls or roof will be permitted. Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-97-10, a request for approval of rezoning from Commercial- One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an outline development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be Denied for the following reasons: 1. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Option A: "I move that the request for approval of a final development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. All maximum requirements of the zoning code have been met. 2. All requirements for a PID final development plan have been met. With the following conditions: 1. If the variance is approved, the plan be revised accordingly. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property." Option B: "I move that the request for approval of a final development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be denied for the following reasons: 1. 2. Option A: "I move that the request for afive-foot sign setback variance for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue be approved for the following reasons: I. Approval of the reduced request would not prove a hazazd to the public health, safety and welfare. 2. It would not leave a negative impact on property values or the public welfare. 3. Proposed location is more aesthetically pleasing than other locations meeting setbacks. .. Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica With the following conditions: 1. A building permit be applied for and issued prior to the existing sign being moved. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property." Option B: "I move that the request for afive-foot sign setback variance for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue be Denied for the following reasons: 1. 2. • ~ Ex-Nl Br T ~,q { Planning Commission Minutes June 5, 1997 Page 3 anticipate excessive noise from a new 35 HP motor as opposed to what was the case with older 5 IiP models. Discussion was held regazding semi-trucks, fill to be used, flood plain concerns, reluctance of having a.tire recapping business, landscaping, loading zones, general traffic, noise, zoning, horsepower limits, time limited semi parking, outside storage, type of businesses allowed, and effort to save as many trees as possible. A motion was made by Commissioner CERVENY, seconded by Commissioner SNOW, "I move that Case No. WZ-97-7, a request for approval of a rezoning from Residential-Two and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an outline development plan for property located at 6225 West 48th Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: I . It is within the City of Wheat Ridge, posting notifications have been met. 2. Although some of the uses aze semi-industrial in nature, the proposal is consistent with adjoining zoning and development 3. The property cannot be reasonably developed under current zoning. 4. All responding agencies can service the facility. With the following conditions: 1. That performance standards as "Exhibit A" be included under the list of allowed uses. 2. A note disallowing billboards be placed on the plan. 3. If feasible and subject to approval of the Final Development Plan, brick accent be used on those building elevations visible from adjoining streets. 4. Outside storage can be allowed on the northern most building provided that it is not accessible by vehicles and will be reviewed at the time of the submittal of the Final Development Plan. 5. Mature trees to be preserved as practical. 6. No above ground loading docks be shown on the Final Development Plan. 7. In the fist of uses, tire capping be eliminated. 8. That the plan provide noise standards that aze acceptable per State standards. 9. Repair or maintenance of semi-trucks be eliminated. 10. Regular parking or storage of semi's outside the premise will not be allowed." Motion carried 8-0. B. Case No. WZ-97-5: An application by Pacifica Holding Company LLC to , rezone from Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development, outline Ptazuung Commission Minutes June 5, 1997 Page 4 plan approval and final development plan approval with a variance for property located at 9500 W. 49th Avenue, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Ms. ]Zckert presented an overview of this case and entered into the record, zoning ordinance, comp plan, slides, exhibits, and other pertinent information. Ms. Reckert stated that the applicant has requested rezoning to eliminate some of the allowed uses that they feel are undesirable for the neighborhood and to expand some of the allowed uses. 'there was one letter of abjection which was included in the packet. Allowed uses include C-1 uses with the exception of undesirable businesses such as adult entertainment, auto repair, and bars. It has been required of the applicant to include performance standards into the list of allowed uses. Availability for outside storage is a concern due to visibility and Staff is requesting that storage be excluded from the eastern two buildings and limited storage for the .vestem buildings which would include outdoor screening. She discussed the sign size and ]rciglrt originally denied whetr presented to the Boazd of Adjustments in March, 1997 •The sign change constitutes a reduced request for sign setback variance. The developer installed an improper sign during original development due to a misconception on their pari regarding what aspects of the development were covered by the building permit. Chairperson WILLIAMS swore in Mike Kendall. of Pacifica Holding Company, 5350 S. Roslyn. Mr. Kendall stated that they would remove the request for outside storage in order to create a "business pazk" atmosphere. They plan to remove inappropriate uses and replace them with more desirable businesses. He stated there have been considerable requests for azeas that include some storage inside behind the front offices. He stated that 80% of this type of use is office/business space with the remaining 20% light industrial. The horsepower request stems from technology improvements and an effort to be flexible for future tenants. He is willing,to compromise.~however. He said that higher horsepower with new generators will generate less noise and pollution. He stated that uses they would eliminate include adult entertainment establishments, autollight duty truck sales/rental, out-of--service repair shops, hotels/motels, mortuaries, motor fueling, woodworking, drive-in restaurants, pawn shops„bars, theaters or night clubs. Targeted business for this project are of the 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. type businesses. He feels that Pacifica is trying to make the project as aesthetically pleasing as possible. Chairperson WILLIAMS swore in Chris Rusch, 6108 S. Pierson, Littleton, 80127. Mt. Rusch is the sign designer and presented the proposed sign overview. General discussion included elimination of all outside storage, appearance of the building, light industrial usage, free standing signs, maximum machine horsepower, noise created by generators and the opening of the garage doors for ventilation, truck traffic, screening of the apartment .buildings, what type of fence would be installed, fire department concerns regarding the indoor fire system and various site improvements. .. Planning Commission Minutes June 5, 1997 Page 5 ~ - ' The following motions were presented: 9utline Development Plan Commissioner SNOW motioned, Commissioner THOMPSON seconded, "that Case No. WZ-97- 5, arequest for approval of rezoning from Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an outline development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. The number and type of industrial uses included make it industrial use not commercial. 2. As such it is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan which shows office/retail at the Kipling Activity Center Master Plan. 3. It is not compatible with the adjacent residential properties. 4. It can reasonably be used within the current zoning. 5. Allowing rezoning uses to industrial uses in one of the designated commercial activities could establish a precedence to ignore the intent of activity centers throughout the City. Motion failed 3-5. (Commissioners Rasplicka, Cerveny, Brinkman, Griffith, Williams: denied). Final Development and Outline Plan Commissioner BRINKMAN motioned, Commissioner CERVENY seconded, "that the request for approval of an outline and final development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: I. A rewning is required to expand allowed uses as recommended by Staff which would allow a land use transition. 2. Al(requirements for a PCD outline development plan have been met. With the following conditions: 1. In the development standards, the perimeter setback next to the right-of--way be changed to 50 feet. 2. No regulaz long term parking ofsemi-trucks and trailers be allowed. 3. No outside storage be allowed. 4. Any use not permitted under the Commercial-One and not listed under the additional light industrial, cannot occur between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.. 5. Any use in excess of 35 I-IP in the two most eastern buildings be reviewed on a t case-by-case basis by Staff. .. Planning Commission Minutes June 5, 1997 Page 6 6. In the two western buildings, any use in excess of 40 HP will not be allowed without Staffs discretion. 7. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc. to outside walls or roof will be permitted. . 8. Eliminate uses listed on the plan under #8. 9. No woodworking businesses will be allowed." Motion carried 5-3. (Commissioners Snow, Thompson, Shockley: denied). Variance Commissioner THOMPSON motioned, Cotnmissioner CERVENY seconded, "that the request for a five foot sign setback variance for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue be APPROVL-D for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the reduced request would not prove a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare. 2. It would not have a negative impact on property values or public welfare. 3. Proposed location is more aesthetically pleasing than other locations meeting setbacks. e following conditions: I . Landscaping be instatled around the base of the sign. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property." carried 8-0. C. Case No. ZOA-97-1: An application by the City of Wheat Ridge to consider proposed amendments to the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Chapter 26, Zoning Code, Section 24. Light Industrial District Regulations regarding uses allowed as "Principal Permitted" and "Special Uses", City of Wheat Ridge , County of Jefferson, State of Colorado (Continued from Apri13, 1997.) Director GIDLEY presented an overview of case history. He stated that he has rewritten the ordinances which were attached to the packet for review. There are four sepazate issues being addressed in order to meet State Constitutional requirements. The Council Bills address Semi- Trucks and Trailers, Outside Storage, Landscaping, and Special Use Permits. It does not rezone any property or retro-apply to any existing use. The only way it would apply to any existing use is if the owner started a new business, built a substantial addition or redeveloped property, and is s, 4•s' I~ I,~' r ,~• I~ ALL EQUAL ~ 18'7` t/- `-F-CEMER TO F~ ELEVATION oNE REQUIRm sc,AtF: i~•.ttr TIiL~IA.IW(f FFACFn C1 uc -.!)54 Nl~1CABINET-PAMTEALBI-UE PEfi AOOF TOP SAMPIE - 118' ALUMINUM FACE PAINT TEAL GREEN - ftOlli COPY AND BACKiVITFI WHTTE FLEX - T i2 LLLUMtlVATION - U.L. SPECiFICJ1TI0NS - 2T/YOITWIRIN(i-3AMPS - CONCEAL FASTENERS ~ i0'O' STRUCTURE(VERIFt~ ~ i GO' TENANT PANEi (VERFY) 14'8' TIRE CABINET WIDTH ., i 8. TIi1E . CA81NET6 ~~ H H i~s•ilraF TE3JAr(i PANE]. ', F--I . lain sT>:nicrtx~E 1---i east:G stl~s i~~ .. April 03, 1997 T0: Maideth Rekert City of Wheat Ridge ~soo w. tom Ave. vVltat:;d8e. Co go21s Re: 7o Wet Business Park Manumeni sign 25 Yesn d Spn YdusuY F~dbnoe FROM: Chris Rusch -; .y= We are pleased to fwnish you with the following additianal'mCortnation pertinrnt to the Monumrni Sign: _ _.._.. _______ ____-_____.._...... .....~.rn can nncratccct • Maximum sign height - 50' • Maximtun sign size - 600 S.F. PROPOSFD FREECTANDING' • Sign height - 24'-11" • Sign size - 260 S.F. Typical Business signagc Iocated~in the same vicinity adaccnt to I-70: American Molel 30' ~~ Amoco 40Y30' 15' BtvnswicF: Bowl 40' 0' Conoco 50' IS' Ftars 40' 20' Holiday [nn 35' 10' JW Brews 50' 15' . Kettlesrn 50' 10' Lutheran 25' S' Medved 40'!30'/30' 18'/12'/i2' Morgan 50' ~ IS' 70 W. Exec. Ceuta 25' IS' Texaco 40'130' 8'/5' The (13) business' located in the vicinity have far the most part higher signs with a similar setback to that ofwhich we arc requesting. Please review tfie attached photos and sign drawing. Note the quality of the sign design and componrnts. We have carefully designed the proposed sign to conCornt to the building architecture, seating continuity in the Business Crnler. We feel this enhances the image and quality of the Business Center u well a3 the neighborhood. We fttt the proposed sign plaamrnt is the most accommodating location. A 10' sdback would put the sign in the parking lot. Locating the sign near the building would be detriments[ to the integrity of the Business Center. The sign visibility would be virtually eliminated ,both to imctslak and local tratTc. We appreciate your time and oauideratan in our request. PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST C'A~E NO: WZ-97-10 DATE: August 21, 1997 REQUEST: A public hearing to consider an application by Pacifica Holding Company, LLC, for approval of a rezoning from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an outline development plan and a final development plan and plat variance. Property is located at 9500 W. 49th Ave.. The City of 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Wheat Ridge, Colorado Ridge Telephone 303/ 234-5900 August 21, 1997 This is to inform you that Case No. 7-1 which is a request for u =~ a property located at 9500~9t~t venue will be heard by the Wheat Ridge CITY COUNCIL in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 7500 West 29th Avenue at 7:00 .M. on S +n.a/hPr 8 1997. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the CITY COUNCIL. As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this meeting. If you have any questions or desires to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division. Thank you. PLANNING DIVISION ,~ "The Carnation City Michael Miller Francis Oschmann 9240 W. 49th Avenue #316 8348 W. 75th Way Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Arvada, CO 80005_ Jill Cwalina Gary Werle 9340 W. 49th Avenue #202 9340 W.49th Avenue #203 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 John Brancucci Riley Meehan 9340 W. 49th Avenue #205 _ 980 W. 100th Place Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. Northglenn, CO 80221 James Peters Jaime J. Jones 1940 Garland Street 9340 W. 49th Avenue #210 Lakewood; CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Richazd Bell Karen Scheck 9340 W. 49th Avenue #2121 9340 W. 49th Avenue #213 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Inga VonHortenau Karolyn Lanoue 6171 S. Kearney Street 9380 W. 49th Avenue #102 Englewood, CO 80011 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Stephen Scott Ruth Cowan 5285 Tabor Street 9380 W. 49th Avenue #106 Arvada, CO 80002 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Thomas Green Mehran Sowdaey 9380 W. 49th Avenue #109 9380 W. 49th Avenue #109 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 _ Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Joan/Robert Evans Waldemar Borowiec 9380 W. 49th Avenue #112 9380 W. 49th Avenue #113 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 JamesBanee Rock Mohamad Saka 9380 W. 49th Avenue #115 9380 W. 49th Avenue #117 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Chazles VonFiortenau 6171 S. Kearney Street Englewood, CO 80111 James Alberta 9340 W. 49th Avenue #204 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jeffrey Rathman 9340 W. 49th Avenue #208 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 David Jackson 1940 Garland Street Lakewood, CO 80215 Floyd Espinoza 9340 W. 49th Avenue #217 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Ruben Sandoval 9380 W. 49th Avenue #103 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Judith Pippin 9380 W. 49th Avenue#108 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Howard N., Schiff P.O. Box 1390 Arvada, CO 80001 Rick Keenan 9380 W. 49th Avenue #114 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phil Haas 9380 W. 49th Avenue #118 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mehran Sowdaey ~- 'Tl"~"a g Cx~~ Howard Schiff 9380 W. 49th Avenue #109 ~ ~ ^~^ .,T. ~u+~ n, _ ~B~Z 1/a... Gndn, P.O. Box 1390 5 ~ rva-~ Arvada, CO 80001 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 _ ~yw-( Carol Bergner Jason Mathews Jeffco Community Center Douglas Crynes 9380 W. 49th Avrenue #117 7456 W. 5th Avenue 5954-1/2 Sheridan Blvd. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80226 Arvada, CO 80003 Craig/Robert Evans Ruth Cowan Stephen Scott 9380 W. 49th Avenue #106 9380 W. 49th Avenue #105 5285 Tabor St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Arvada, CO 80002 Ruben Sandoval Frederic Woll Jr. Valerie Valdez Donald/Karen Anton 9380 W. 49th Avenue #118 9380 W. 49th Avenue #103 3470 Nelson St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jaime Jones Ruby/David Olson Kay/Rick Keenan 9340 W. 49th Avenue #210 6331 Haven Chase Lane 9380 W. 49th Avenue #114 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Salt Lake City, UT 84121 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Waldemar Borowiec Robert/Joan Evans Esther/David Meehan 7148 W. 74th Avenue 9380 W. 49th Avenue #112 980 W. 100th Pl. Arvada, CO 80003 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Denver, CO 80221 Becky/John Brancucci Alberta/James Peters Michael Burgmaier 9340 W. 49th Avenue #205 1940 Garland St. 6958 Brentwood Ct. #3 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. _ Lakewood, CO 80215 Arvada, CO 80004 Jill Cwalina Dan/Ticie Ann Taylor Thomas/Denise Klinger 9340 W. 49th Avenue #202 P.O. Box 632 11735 W. 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Evergreen, CO 80437 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Linda Snow Richard/Sandra Bell Charles/Inga VonHorten 9340 W. 49th Avenue #213 9340 W. 49th Avenue #212 6171 S. Kearney St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Englewood, CO 80111 Mary/Floyd Espinoza Donaldson Investment Co. Jeffrey Rathman 9340 W. 49th Avenue #217 811 Reed St. 9340 W. 49th Avenue #208 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 David Jackson Lisa Blatz Francis Oschmann 9340 W. 49th Avenue #211 9340 W. 49th Avenue #210 8348 W. 75th Way Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Arvada, CO 80005 James Warner Patrick/ Cynthia Mershon Donald Pratt 9240 W. 49th Avnue #304 11169 W. 68th Way 9240 W. 49th Avenue #303 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Arvada, CO 80004 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Charles Maher Stephen Hart Mary Jane Dusek P.O. Box 1502 9240 W. 49th Avenue #315 9240 W. 49th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Pamela Kennedy Shirley Ross Jeann Hull 9240 W. 49th Avenue #311 9240 W. 49th Avenue #308 9240 W. 49th Avenue #308 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 W'll' s ~ Duane/Janet Doffing William/Mazolyn Rogers o r v 2035 Lowell Blvd. 4400 S. Independence Trail t Denver, CO 80211 Evergreen, CO 80439 Harry Richner 70 Executive Center GP David Thyfault 9445 W. 49th Avenue 4891 Independence St. 9380 W. 49th Avenue #101 Wheat Ridge, CO ~ 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 _ Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dan Taylor Gary Dillard Donald Pratt P.O. Box 632 9240 W. 49th Avenue #301 9240 W.49th Avenue #303 Evergreen, CO 80437 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Alexandra Ilardo Daniel Dewild Josephn Heimller 9240 W. 49th Avenue #303 9240 W. 49th Avenue #306 9240 W. 49th Avenue #306 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Ray Wells Mark Ross James Klein 9240 W. 49th Avenue #308 9240 W. 49th Avenue #310 9240 W. 49th Avenue #311 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Came Suggs Patrick Mershon Charles Von Hortenau 9240 W. 49th Avenue #311 11169 W. 68th Way 6171 S. Kearney Street Wheat Ridge,.CO 80033 Arvada, CO 80111 Englewood, CO 80111 N O 7J m °o O 7] m 0 O 7J W OJ a O C 0 w P '963 361 675 ~ _ o T., Cq m m m ~ -- ~ G m < _m c -` ~ o ~ o V ~ ~ i ~~ ~ , .p rx ¢ o ox ° ~ $ m ~r~,o c o m - N OZ ; ~ m ~ a _ ~ Y ~.. _- RV W P 963 36Z p 676 ( __~ ~. T -- r IJ ~ ^' ~m~ z -'-i m y z j Cl.. O O :-I _.. m O ~ O - .... C ~ ~ O m __ ' O ~ ~ f3. O o v ox ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ n d I~ T m ~_ o yy m p ~n0 ~ .,. l. P 96~_$36I, 683 ~# VJ 1' m A (m" m [i)`~) 1~ f` Z < m -1 m -~i z O o n nm ~~~ ~ o c ~ ~ n~ "£, ~ ~ o ~~ O ~ ~ m ''_g g mo I 1 ~ ~ a~ w a 9g Uf ' n zm om m _ 30 -o n ~ `mac (p o' ~ N ~ 9 ~~ ~~ v ~ I I ~I1 -. N 0 _~ ~ -' W 1 m _ ~ ~. °y--- ~•. 1, 4~ ~ ~i Q O ~ ~ ~. i r ~• ~, ~, ~, .. ~ a o'P ~fNil (A 77 _ ~ ~ m 3 ~3 Z ~~ o ~.'W(~=~m~~~ROm < ~' _.- H z a N ~o~ _ao ~~.. W ~ _ ~. 3 m a ~ ~ ~ ~ N f. ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ` O C ~ ~ d n `- \ C~Att rn ~ ~- a ~ s N d ~ ~ z `' o~ _~ oR / p -a a 1 ~ 7"' O a.-- ~ ~'~0 90 m V] O C ~ ~ o ~. ,~ C~ o ~ s a o Oa, 3o NN 0 2 0o O ~ a' y ` ° ~ ~' ~ 3 3 ~ m ' ~ ~ m ~ - ~ ~ d ~` ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ o o m. n o a `~- o _ ~ ~ x 3 m a to ~ -- - - _- - - a ~ ~ s~ gm ~ w ~ ~ N~ ~ m a ~,~ ~m m " c ~ ~ .p ~ a ~ ~ m..A m a N O.n ¢ v o ~~ W " I .t ~ (D ~ 3 D - r , v v+ a' o' ~. f ~ /~ ~ ~ N 3 Z V~ (D ~ ~. ~ -Z _0 0 ~ n 9 _ ~_ (~ 3 __ .~.. V p N ~ D '~ ~° O ~ = a o o ~` 1 .w ~ m ~ m H i 3 ~ N ~ o ~ I ~ ~~, ~ n N ~ ~ n ~, ~ _ ~~ ~~ - 3 _ W V A A n ~' Q N n ga ° ~ r iim < y N o lc.( <. 'O ~ o J~ C) N N ~ O ~ I ~ ~ ~ Z O 3.- ~° ¢ ~'lc ~ m w ~ ~ n No o. ~ "a N a '<_ F. m ~ ~ W N m ~~ m p- n w ~, aai ~ ~ m a ~ m O. W N~ y K S ~ y p'~ N N IMPORTANT! PLACE STfCKER AT TOP OF ENVELOPE TO - - - _ -- - - ' __ - _ = .t 1 P 9~3 361 669 ~ fOfl m m m 1 <ma ~ Z -H m ~ ~ 1 ~ x ~ A w ~ Lz' .p ~^~ 1 __- ~ org=~ (1 P 963 361 A 67® ~_ '-O m 'fn m m m fn ~ n -+ ` T Z n y -I m ~ ~ oo ~ O w ~ O ~*, ~O O ~ ! CG ~ '~' n 0~8 a ~ ~ E G S'C _ ' -' - - - P 963 361 671 T (A O 3 W O 0 C O N A? C n (D T ~ fD m a~ ^~ ~ iiI O U1 m m 9m fTl c i ~ m c n .~ !~ l -ZI m -mi i O K ~ ~ ~ W . ~ O ° p CJ] ~ Q ~, ~ ~ o € n _ a s ~, o= r 5 o ~ fil ° m .t m ~i ~p C3 an g GO CD ~o m a a im O .-' i~ w ~ g 'P y n ~ ?^ 9 - oa n m~ - I i AFy1 e 3 9 0 °a ti IMPORTANT! PLACE STICKER AT TOP OF ENVELOPE TO ! _ THE RIGHT OF RETURN ADDRESS. _ _ ~.. P 963. 361570 ~ ROl m m m ~ 3~" iTy ~ '-Zi m y ~ ~ ~ Ua't ~ O W `~ . W __ -_ - O ., __n ~ r -_. ~ --- N _ __- _. - m 3 y_- • • • y 6 x a'Y' ~ (n ~' ~ ~ ~ '{ ;; ~ . Z ~ ~ E- gsm 963 361 5 71 m , C m Sl .. C O :.~ n D o ~ ~ . tY ; 3 CO ~ m 1 : c w ~ a 3 f m n n /~ ~ .~ p^ - ~ p1 o i CTT CY TF Z ~ ~" s m ~ .... r a o r ~~ .x. O fi ~' mo ~ `; m 1 i . ., F _ $ w ~ i.1 dr7 . - G m ~ S' • ~ (Z J n 3 m (n w • • • •y i ~ Mj oc ~ m m~ Z ' ~: ~ ~ T ~ N ! ~: L^ O 5 D j L O . ~ wM~ a~ m n m ; 20 r '~ W ! I ~ ~' ' y ~ c ~.. ss ~ .. 0 S. ~. a a a tv ~ ~ - ~g _ 2 ~., :"~ is s o ~ ?fi O ~ ~ ~ _ o ~ '.C :a \ ~ ~' S . s ~: d~ ~~ ~-. r: I m n R _ °i 3 - o n _ _ ~ v . m s a ~ s y I n a A ry ~ . m ~ 9 I ~ a ~ c m 3 w m I 1 n m ~ Q ~ n' O Zn T D -G y _ - ~. "O ~ v , g TICKER AT TOP OF ENVELOPE TO m m i o ~ - OF RETURN ADDRESS. HT O .~ Z _ aw ~ m ~ wQ m =.aa"~ - ~+ a ~ ~ a m a <F ~ ~ ~ (` -~ T W ' . f~nti ~, lP t7 S y Q ~ ~' 3 `° m ~' o I o ~ o~_sm m m a m m ~ ~ ~ m ¢ ~ m a ~ ~ `C N .K..S ~ N ~~ lU tU `- _=- P .963 361 666 ~ O) m m ~ m m m a O -{ T -91 Z ~$~ I " ~ 1 W O ~ r+ V ~ ' ~ ~ o ~ 'ox ~ O - - ~ - ( ~ ~z9 ~ G --- ~ ~ p~ ^ lI r m l~ P 9P~3 361 667 ~I ~ ~ a n ~ ~I ~ W r ~ ~ ~ m -~i ~ ~~ O , O ~~G ~ , II _ .. o ~~ ~ ~ a ~~ o II o ~~ o f T Ho m !I ~~ • == - o - -~ P 963 361.668 7J W [D 0 w n (D n ~ ~ ~ rt ~ M Q '8 ~ 0 W m m m m ~_~ ~ m ~ z s~ ~ ~ ~ yy y ~ C ~y +. G I ., ~y T ~ n ~' ° ~ ~ S mac, P+ ~ p c yu.0 ~ o mm m r ~ ~ A O o O cc Z ~ m m "= ~D ig G i 0o o a n O (C O ~ m °m W. W r so y ~m z~ -o r° ~~ v e y 3 ° a °a ----~ ~ ~ -- -- - _~_- -a ~ > as ~rUr ~/ yy. = ~ = z O /~'~ n ~ .p a~ v° E.' v G _~~~ W -_ `a ` m F W co c a O bi-~ U ~ ~ ~. 3 m ~ '-0~ C -m o 3 ~ C ~ ~ N . a _..m m (]~ ', ~ ^ i - ~ -~ - ~ __= m +:2 m -- d ~. ~ ~ N n. ti~ 2 S ~ m fn Sl c N N ~ ~ ~ m _ 3 ~ n m ~ ,~ _ ,~ , a o ~R ~ `~ ~ ° t"~ ~ o ~ `~ 3 F N ~ ~ h-~~ o ~ ~.J ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ s S' $ ~ '.; - ~ .+~ o q y n ~ o a a o o :r-= c ~' W ~ -: ~ - - w - y . . . .y ~ a o~ ~m n p 01 ~ ~ p m ~ ~ ~°~- ~ m _ '' Vi ~ ~ S W ~ ~ ~ 3 '~ ' V ~ a o d v ~ ~ ~.~ ao ~ co c/1 ~ 0 R 3 = ~ N 2 ~^.~ aC ~ F o m R ~ O~ '~? ~ f~ 's 00 3k ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ o = A ~ W ~ ~ ° 9 ~. W ~ o m . N __- -, ---- w -- a N ~>o~~m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ '~ ~~ ~°m ~i[ m r~ ~ n( ~ ~ ~~ Cib Y3 E N~ ~~ .. Q W ,~ ~ x '¢ ~ ~ 3 w7? ~ ~ S ~. ao m ~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ° o `~ ~ ~ . 1 N Q ~ w •Y g ~ 3 _. O ~ - m m ~' 9 O W -'~. a m 5 ~ o ° W ~ 0 F w ~y m a~ ~ a° ~ a ~ ~ _ z'~ ' ~ 3 - o W J A6 ~ d Z ~ cn D a K O O ~ ~~ N ~ ~ N C O 'Q" ~ m ~ w s l ~ a~a~o m ".~ W y ~. `m ~~ a ~' ~ " n U I m O e a "" ° ~ om' °n ~ r~D eT' ~. v m m, a K P . ~ N ~ N . a ~ m m m IMPORTANT! PLACE STICKER AT TOP OF ENVELOPE TO ~ ... THE RIGHT OF RETl1RN ADDRESS. F P 9t~3 361 1 577 ~ ~ ~ m m Cn m Z O fW~ pi C1 myz ~ LrylG $ W C7 N w '~.c~ 0 o 7J ty qZt,. ~ 3 ~ m 'oi - . LLn t4' o ~ m~ S :. . - ~ o No , ~ o o c. '. i o n ~; ~ __ - - ___ P 963 361 578 77 W O O O N ~_ G, A (D ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ "'IMPORTANT Cn m m m m ~ m ~~ ~ n 4 Z ~ 4$ b++ O ~ ~ yy~. ~ ~ . W ~. <! '^ GQ tCS !'~` _ ~J 9 mZ c~i ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 n O p C ~ m 00 Cl Iy Y ym > C; <O O IS ~ ~O m O Ay ~ Z< `~ ry~ ~ wr w ~ + 9 ~ PJ L j Q !N om ~ ~ - °m 3 a ~ ~ _ m -~ I < <~ r- _..._a ... ~ i ~~ 9 -: 4 9 M.~ -_ ~ ~_„ ~ f ..." i... - +~r 1 1 I l __.m_ (n _ ~ -.. J7 ~..~ ..-- w r. . • r. n o c c ~. L D o m o ' ~m ¢ r. a n o H •• n ~ 7 '. ".r ~ 0 0 ~~ G ~ w ~ a F. ~ ° ~ a °n o ~ I ~ ` F 3 ' ~~ ~. < r f 1 F _ 3 rv ~ o n Ip ~ _ "T ~ m 'm_ (p O i . +.b ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ n n . o o ~ 4 ~ 0 VV ~ ~ _ ,... D n g, n 3 . _..,. _. __ ~-- -. zF _k t 1 THE RIGHT OF RETURN ADDRESS, l _ ~P 963 361 573 ~ ~ a n m + U1 .,r 4 < m c ~ m y z ~ T.1 j1 q o ~~~ ~ GJ i ~ ~ ~ O ~ O O m o m g g ~ a 5 ~ m _ wi a om ~ ° ~ - il P 963 361 575 Cn m m m m D G m T~ -ZI m ~ z ~ .~M ' b's S ~ + O W ! ~ d' fK O C ~ Q ~~ ~ N 9 NO A ~ ~ E "1 ~ti a = m N c w ~ o u io m e +rF 3 o T- °f _ P 963 361 576 v O W 0 0 G Cn 0 .N.- w (D n m ~ .A \V /~ ~• \ / ~T"I\ \^^V i.l. ~ O IMPORTANT f0 m m m m ~m zl A m -°i z c a O ~~~ `~+. ~ B 8 £1.. ~ $~'~ o z ~ '-' ~ N O 4~ !S' N y ~ 5 $ QTY a $ m ~o a -nc ~_ zo {~S1 m pt ~o m '<m ~ ~m y a °g ~ O ~ ~m y °~m ~ to ~~ m" W _ ~~ I 0 a N 3 9 9 fi °a ~ m PLACE STICKER AT TOP OF ENVt LVPt 1 ~Qr I r ._. ~ x 3 c R 1 Q C ~ m O ~ a _: _ m __ ~ _- Q X~ v ...- m , m m m _e, (O ~ i~ 3 ': ~ ~- ~ ~~ r`: C _ _`_m S (D n ~ T w . . • 41 ~ > ~ ~ a a m r... ~~ ~ ~~ .. Q n ~ ~ a W <~ N ~ m 3 K ~ _ ^ N 9 O m ~ N 3 m N y l _ G s d ' g ... 3 m m a Q •- ~~ <- N ~ ry _ N m n } ~ m m a W ) I ~. ~~ ~' W `) Z \ D r ~ y ~, y T ~ N N. a m a " a C W ~ m Q N _N Q ~\ V .~ ~~ ~O J~ o - o m a ' a c .. _ . _- o 1. W • •N ~ ~ °=~z n ~ a ~' _p .. ~.is• -s a ~a ~ ~ m o a u n £. tT n N .. w .' a 7 '} _°? ~J' 3 w n o .7E ~ _ P,d ~:m m m r m o ~ c a.m°°-.a m w • • .y D _ > ~ _ ~ ~Z a m~ A o ' ~~ - ti 3 J N Ip O O ~ ~ ~ ~ a - n .: ~' ~ a ~ N C. c ~ E o ~' a ~ s ~ ~ ,-T _ ' 3 u fi a a;' m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - _ F. F ~ , o ~ R 3 m ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ 3 A ~ a V1 D ~J~/ ~ (~ f ~ ~ (p ~ O N ~ O ~\ t' ~~} n K ~ n j N^ 0 tp ~ N ~ m W s ~ 21 D u o ~ N '6 N 04. _ ~, W y m ~, m ~~ m ~ m a ~ ~ o O ~ N N O N m O y ~ ~ <Q J <' ~.I a 0 d ry N ~' N `~ N .K.. ~ m y ~ m m _ (n W O O O O O O °o C Cn O .N-. w <_ O (D lJ ~ ~ N ~ Q.~ --n v ~ (MPORTANP. P 963 361 56 SEW"!1 .ds f~Y ~. o ~ ~ S 7~1 ~• q ~. .r. .. a~ _-Y~ 6 1 fA D D lnil CD n v Z m -~ o ~ of n ~ vap ~i. - E y o "' H~ m o_ of m -.?. _ P 963.361 567 0) m m D ' m Z < m c C'S m ~ z ~~ A~ CD j !~ ..i ,v ~f$ ~ ~ ' ~. o ~' ~ t m~ tr i~' v o_ ~ ~ o~ „ P 963 361 568 (n m m m Z < m c y ~ -i D m -tea z ~~ O f!9 O ~ Ep A.3 -q ' o m o= o I ~ n~ ~ z " o y o m o-s ~ s= ~ '" r~ d yz (X1'~ o m ~~ m ~v p~ C.? ~ r a 1 `9 Wtlf ~ ! z t+s+k ~~ ~ on ` z n o _ ~ ~i mm rt ~ A I~ti r~ rm ~ _1 C <4 o AT TOP OF -TURN ADC - _w~ =p~ Z .zl m m 4 `D ~ - '3 m -. ~ ~ ~ N = w Q;y ;~.~ - (~ m W ~ G ... ~ n 3 ~~ .. j n 1 ~ ~.. a« Q F.% as ~i ~. ~ - ~ - ~ ° v v ~ o f0 ~ tQ t,. r". R4 ~ a ~ m {• _ ~ - _ ° o ~ ~ ..__ £ m H t ~ ~ _ _ a Q R .._ . ...__..-.. ._. _ - __ . i z 3 i -..~ rn m ~ w .y \/ D ~aso~~m 3 1 1 ,\~ ,~ ,~ t= ..d y 3F 4 U ~ Q ~~ ~' ~. ~ w` ~° ~ 1 ~ °'^a ~° 1 ,~J V . ~ .. .~ O .~.. ~ 3 s ~ _ 8 ~ ~ ~ _ `~ -. ° o K ~ ~ ~ m ° o m -^ ~ _ m w _ .,- ~.m _.o._ H D s ~ ~. ~ _,..: 3 c m :"' ~ 1, °n a o o ... ^ ~~ 9 _ r ~. {+ (J ~s y ~. U ' .~M O' £, to d o m 'g e' o a _., ro D '~. ... 3 _. -- m 4. (.: d _~.- a ~ w { ~ 3 __. - o rFv ° ~ ~ a o ~_ N O 3 ~ ~ ~ 6 ~i n d 3 Z d O N D O N ~ m O~J~/ n ~~ N i O ti; W /~ N ~ `G_ _ °_ K ~ vim- ~ ^^~~ a ~ N .. -~ m Q... DD ~'o ~ ~¢ ~~ m W ~ o .~y.Q<y. j 4 m W .~'. n m~~ > m ~,~ D' 3 m v ~+ o (~D qpp ~ ' w o' m o m A ) m O y n 4g `" o a m x» d u w ~ '` N s ~-_._ m w m ~: _t~...~_ -_ - } y' _ - _, } ~ +~'~ 'V jr+~~_ ;~ r ~I I ~_ ~ i~ ~~ r ~ ~\~P? ~ ss3aaav Naruaa do lN~la aw. ' ° 013dO13AN3 d0 d011tl 83NOI1S 30tl1d i1Ntl1HOdW1 y _ - ,-..- __-. - ~ _ _ . jl 1 W ~ ~ UI ! o d ~ ¢o Q. ~ J~,~F~M ~ ~ x ~~ ~ -, m ~ ~ () ~x ~ ~ m j o ,, ~+~ \ ~-. ~.~ ~j ` t ~ ~ Ni ` \ ~~ ~~ ~ ~i~~~l ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~/ ~ N .~ ~~ ~ ..- ~. ~~ w w ^' I G'a 1 -< n' iq €~ ~~ ~ m ~~ = ~a ~ Mo N __ 4~Y~ c' / I i ~ w w~ x ~ o°o - d° 1' F„ w~ ~. ~~ O Cn y fry . ~,v ~aa g ®~ [ o~ ~ o w? ctl ~ ~ ~ - _ _ _ "7' i°r I oo ~ ~ ti 'Z'~$,r f.e ~~"' az «f 7;G o iF c~. ac ~~ Va •~ a x°o w ti s x a ~. v ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ J err!°~o c° I ~- c'd cry ~ - ~ _ ~O° ~ ~a v E- E~rn~ O - f w w ~ ~ d - _. ¢¢w `Q~E ~ - .. .... 0 0 Q ~a ~ hL9 `C9E E96 d w ~ 0 1 j~ ~ w~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ am m w O ~ = O d W CJ Ri ~ Wo 1' ~ 3 gg m W r= -_. ~i w ~ 3 F_ ~` ~a~~, ~ +~ yy~ E ,~Y1n ~tY Y'l) Yob V.S. t yy.~^ Yr3 `' 'f I~a/> R»r~ ~-. tl I, ~, I~ t q ~~ rtti AGE a~ v ~ :~; ~~ ~ ~ m V~ N ~ ?,/? V L _. -.mow ..0 ui .o m Q.. W_ W a w U w Z ~_ F /~ ~~ u i o O E ~ M ~ 4 ~ ~ cv ~R :.2 J ~~ ~~ 695 'C9E E96 d: _~~ w ~ . z ~ W N _O ~ ~ Q ~ ~ m O ~.y o ~ ~ ~ w 3 Sw r ; _ j T F ~ ~ 'SS38Wtl N8013 p 1H~JItl 3Hl QL 3dOl3AN3 d0 d01 ltl 83Y0115 30tl1d ilNtl180dW1 Tc r k e - L ~(O Q o ~ ~ ~ ae Q. ~ ~ ~ ~= h U .~., N '~ ~ L v ~C ~~ s ~~ v rn( ` ~( \ rts ~3 E Op~~ ~ E dj v o M V H rn l:¢ Od M '-I L h i 0 a 0 (h 0 d ~ 'SS3tlOOtl Ntlf113tl dO lH'J18 3Hl Ol 3dOl3AN3 d0 d01 ltl iJ3NO11S 30tl1d ilNtlJk10dW1 ~9 ~ a ~ y h § 4 o _ `a ~ m S y U o ~. ~ ~ W . a N ~ ~ ~ o ~ ^' ~ I a~-_ =- ~ a ? ~s ~ ~ p U ~ ' h~ g o ~ ~- 3 y y ~b o ~ 3 a ~ x ~ O m ,_ V ` _ Q m m ~ ~ O I g WO ~~ u a4 ~ ro O M B w~G~ ~ ~ a 4 U v~ W __ m.. . _ a m rn rn a CO M v.5 'f. M ao - °`z O v ~a ¢ " ~ ~ a ~ ~ w rc 'o ~~ 0 Q Q VG ZO 0 `50 w ~ V ~ ~r zi y ~' N ~ QN o W ° N 01 ~ w n o QI ~o ~ O ~ W H3 ~ .N o o > ~ W rn 2 _ V Z ~ U ¢ W ¢ w ~ r~ EL9 49E E~16 d' f io V ~~ 00 W < ¢O ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~~ ~ a "~° ~ ~ U ~ o ° a o ~ ~ ~ ~ O - ~ o m ~ ~ o a ~ ~., w ~ C Z - ~ u_ Z a W w ~ W d7 ~~ ~ ~ a Y l 1 2L9 `C9E'E96 d' _ ___ - trxt.~xx xY~xxrt l~ ~ i 1~~~~ l~N ~ ~ IA,~i~ .u7 1~ ,~1 Wa p~. .~ .:., ! ~ ~~,~ r ~\OGE eo ~ p J O 6, a v n~ w j L` • 1 `V ~ f J I ~ ~ f ~/ f 7 off / ~ ~ r I w 7 N _ (~ ~ Z Q W O AA,, W ~ _ W ~ • ~ w N ~ / . 1 ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ • V _ O Q W 2 3 p -- P net,. _ - -- - _. - _ -_ - - ~ . . E_ O __ ~ .. PW 47Q4 _ 3 _ V~C7 L1 W OL _T 7U1 __ OILU= w m z - - - 00 0~ -- _ 71- F-I-I W ~ _. ._ .._ OZ W~~ OC1 JJI- - - - O~ m.`__. ". _ _i W WZ_ M LL J~ ~1 V ,~ - - 7 Q T -- - -. _ - _ - - - _ V1 ~ - h 'O O _. _ _ _ - - _ ~ U h N y~ CC ~--I IO - -- 1--- ~ E ~ _ Q (~~nd p p ~ ~ 6~ j C ~ ~ p p ~ p N 1 ~.~ p C.O o f p g 1 ( I CD ~ e v p ~ e ~. - r F e t F E - _ e ~ R ~ f, 'e CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: City Council DATE OF MEETING: September 8, 1997 DATE PREPARED: September 2, 1997 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-97-10/Pacifica CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert ACTION REQUESTED: Rezoning from C-1 to PID, outline plan approval and final development plan approval with a variance. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 9500 W. 49th Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): Pacifica Holding Company LLC 5350 S. Roslyn St. #240 Englewood, CO 80111 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): APPROXIMATE AREA: 6.2 Acres PRESENT ZONING: Commercial-One Pacifica ARKA/Kipling & I-70 LLC 5350 S. Roslyn St. #240 Englewood, CO 80111 PRESENT LAND USE: Office, Showroom, Storage SURROUNDING ZONING: N: R-C; S: A-1; E: PRD, R-3; W: C-1 SURROUNDING LAND USE: N: office, low density residential; S: I-70; E: multifamily; W: office COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: Commercial Activity Center- Kipling Activity Center Master Plan DATE PUBLISHED: August 15, 1997 ~ ~~ DATE POSTED: August 25, 1997 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: August 21, 1997 ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) () SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ( ) () OTHER CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS SLIDES EXHIBITS JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there jurisdiction to hear this case. Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica I. REQUEST Page 2 The applicant requests approval of a rezoning on property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development and for an out]ine development plan and a fmal development plan with a sign setback variance. The property in question was recently developed under C-1 zoning with four office/showroom/storage buildings totaling 106,524 square feet. Certificates of occupancy have been issued for the anchor tenant, a bank, in the southwestern-most structure on the property and two other tenants. The developer has requested the rezoning to delete currently allowed C-1 uses which aze undesirable and to expand the allowed uses to include some low impact, semi-industrial businesses. The required platting document was previously approved pursuant to Case No. MS-95-4. This was approved prior to issuance of a building permit. Case No. WZ-97-5 was a request by this applicant for approval of a rezoning from C-I to PCD with a similaz list of allowed uses and the same fmal development plan. This request was approved with conditions by Planning Commission at a public hearing held on June 5, 1997. Prior to the public hearing in front of City Council on July 28, 1997, Staff and the applicant were informed by the City Attorney that this was an invalid application as some of the uses being requested were not allowed in the Planned Commercial District, only in the Planned Industrial District. At the City Council hearing, the applicant was given the option of reducing the list of proposed uses so that the truly industrial uses were eliminated or withdrawing the application. The applicant chose to withdraw the then current application and reapplied for a new request calling out the proposal as a Planned Industrial District. II. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The neighborhood meeting for the new application (Planned Industrial Development) was held on August 7, 1997. Those attending included the following: Sean McCartney -staff Mike Kendall -applicant Tim Rogers -applicant Mazilyn L. Rogers -4400 Independence Hts., Evergreen, CO Bob Stafford - 2500 Van Gordon Street, Lakewood, CO The following issues were discussed: Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica Page 3 -That the new development could protect the surrounding neighbors from the noise generated by I-70. - That potential exhaust and noise pollution from the proposed industrial uses should be mitigated by the performance standards included on the plan. III. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT The outline development plan establishes design standards including a 24' height restriction for the main structure, 15' minimum landscaped coverage and building coverage not to exceed 35% of the site area. Allowed uses include all C-1 uses with the exception of undesirable businesses such as adult entertainment facilities, auto repair businesses, lumber yards and bars. Other permitted uses taken from the C-2 and I zones include wholesale businesses, light manufacturing and a contractor's office and shop. The maximum horsepower limitation is listed as 35 HP for the eastern buildings and 40 HP in the western buildings for any machine being used on the premises. However, there would be the availability to increase the horsepower limitation at the discretion of the Planning and Development Director. A potential tenant using machines with greater horsepower than these maximums could be approved as long as this business could conform to the performance standards referenced on this document. Staff is uncomfortable with this provision being left open ended and would recommend the maximum be limited to a specific horsepower. If a horsepower greater than 35 and 40 HP is being requested, a special use permit could be pursued. If City Council is still concerned regazding adjacency to existing residential and is uncomfortable relying on the performance standards, uses could be eliminated in the eastern two buildings. In review of the proposed uses on the outline plan, staff believes #9 ("shops for custom work, ....") is the most intensive and could be eliminated for buildings `A" and `B' or the horsepower maximum of 35 could be reduced to 20 (similaz to Starguide) for those two buildings. All requirements for a Planned Commercial Development outline development plan have been met IV. REZONING CRITERIA In accordance with Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Sec. 26-6(C.), before a change of zone is approved, the applicant shall show and City Council shall find: 1. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, Comprehensive Land Use plan and other related policies or plans for the area. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as being within the Kipling Activity Center Master Plan area. The specific land use classification is "Office/Retail" which would allow a mix Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica Page 4 of uses including retail, service and office. There is no mention of allowing industrial uses in the areas designated as "Office/Retail". Farther to the north, the land is shown as "Business Pazk" which would allow light industrial uses such as the Stazguide facility which was recently rezoned and built. This is a high tech manufacturing facility with a horsepower limitation of 20. For the reason stated above, Staff must conclude that the submittal as proposed, is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, Staff believes there are many high tech manufacturing uses which aze not allowed in Commercial-One but have no impact on adjacent property. 2. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. Adjacent land use and zoning surrounding the property include an office building with C-1 zoning to the west. To the northwest is an office building which has C-1 zoning with PID zoning and uses further to the northwest. Abutting the property to the north is R-C zoning with a mix of office and low density residential use with PCD zoning to the north of this row of properties. Multi-family residential development with R-3 zoning (apartments) and Planned Residential Development zoning (condominiums) are located directly to the east. 3. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change off zone. There will economic benefits to the community as a result of the rezoning. 4. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All service agencies aze currently providing service to the property. 5. That the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, create drainage problems, or seriously reduce light and air to adjacent properties. The change of zone will not affect drainage or the amount of light and air to adjacent properties. The buildings will remain regardless of zoning on the property. Performance standazds were required by Staff to mitigate other potential impacts, particularly to residents to the east. 6. That the property cannot reasonably be developed under the existing zoning conditions. There aze a wide variety of uses allowed under the existing C-1 zoning, however, the developer will have more flexibility in placing tenants with the expanded use list. Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica Page 5 That the rezoning will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. As there is other industrial zoning in the azea, spot zoning is not an issue. 8. That there is a void in an area or community need that the change of zone will fill by providing for necessary services, products or facilities especially appropriate at the location, considering available alternatives. Based on comments from the City's Economic Development Coordinator, there is a void in the market for this type of leasable space in Jefferson County. V. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN A fmal development plan has been submitted which is consistent with the outline development plan building parameters and which accurately reflects what has been built. All minimum requirements of the C-1 zone have been met or exceeded. The exception is the eastern building setbacks which were allowed under the old definitions of "building height" in relation to reestablishing setbacks. No information has been provided regazding signage on the property except for the sign at the southwest corner of the property. The elevation of the sign being proposed is included under Exhibit `A'. The sign is 260 square feet in size and 24'I 1" in height. It is being shown as 5' away from the right-of--way lines which requires a 5' setback variance discussed under Section VI. of this_ report. Staff is supporting the variance if this is the only freestanding sign allowed on the property. All minimum requirements of zoning code have been met. All requirements for a fmal development plan have been met. VI. VARIANCE With this application, the applicant has included a request for a sign setback variance for the project identification sign. There was an original request, Case No. WA-97-3, for approval of a 25' sign setback variance to allow a 30' high sign 5' from the front property line. Pursuant to Section 26-410(e)(3) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, signs over 25' in height must have a 30' setback from street right-of--way. This case was heard and denied by the Board of Adjustment on March 27, 1997. This original request has been reduced by having the sign lowered to 24'-I I" in height, thereby reducing the required setback from 30' to 10'. Therefore, a lesser setback variance of only 5' is needed, rather than the origina125'. Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica Page 6 The applicant has submitted justification for the request by comparing the proposal to other similaz sized signs in the area and the setbacks provided for those. Please refer to Exhibit `A'. Staff would note that the sign was erected without a permit as the developer assumed the building permit for development of the property was all-inclusive. The sign currently has a 5' setback from the r-o-w line and will have to be relocated regazdless of the outcome of the case. Variances must be considered separately from the other cases and requires agreater-than- majority vote based upon Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Section 2-53(s). and Section 26-6(D)(2). Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? If the sign were relocated with a 10' setback, it would still be visible from I-70, however, it may be in a location which is not as aesthetically pleasing as the proposed location. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? Because the sign was erected without a permit, Staff concludes that the hardship is self-imposed. 3. If the variation was granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? There aze many signs in this vicinity of similaz size with comparable setbacks. If the variance were granted it would not alter the chazacter of the area. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? The site is relatively flat and there is an insufficient grade change between I-70 and the property to constitute a hardship. The setback problem occurs because of the Independence/I-70 corner radius requirement and the applicant's need to place the sign perpendiculaz to the freeway for equal visibility from both the east and west. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Yes, however, there aze already signs of compazable size and height in the azea with similar setbacks. Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-9'7-10/Pacifica Page 7 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property? This request is economically motivated. The applicant has chosen the sign location based on the need for maximum exposure to I-70. 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? The developer has created his own hardship by erecting the sign without a permit. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? The sign is located outside of the sight distance triangle and does not pose a threat to public welfare. The proposed location is more aesthetically_ pleasing than an alternate location which meets the 10' setback. The applicant could be allowed two freestanding signs on the property as opposed to the single sign being proposed. For these reasons, Staff concludes that the variance would not be injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood? Because the request is for placement of a sign, not a building, approval of the variance will not impair the supply of light and air to properties. As noted in #8, there should not be endangerment to the public's safety or a negative impact to property values in the vicinity. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above, that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or community, as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Staff has already concluded that granting of the variance would not be detrimental to property, improvements or real estate values in the neighborhood, nor would it hurt the health, safety and welfare. It could prove to be an improvement to the neighborhood aesthetically if no other planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-l0/Pacifica freestanding signs were allowed on the property person with disabilities. Page 8 It would not result in an accommodation to a Staff concludes that although there aze no unique circumstances and the hardship is self-imposed, there would be no endangerment to the public health, safety and welfaze if approved. If the variance is approved, it may result in a more aesthetically pleasing development. For these reasons, a recommendation of approval is given with the following conditions: 1. A building permit be applied for and issued prior to the existing sign being completed. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. VII. AGENCY REFERRALS All agencies are currently serving the property. The Police Department has advised that the use of rocks in the development's landscaping should be discouraged. Given the amount of glass used in the development, the use of rock could facilitate vandalism after regulaz business hours. The Arvada Fire Protection District has expressed concern that some of the proposed uses could require building interior upgrades. Their specific comments have been forwarded to the applicant. VIII. PLANNING COIVIlVIISSION ACTION Planning Commission reviewed this request at a public hearing held on August 21, 1997. A motion was made by Commissioner Cerveny, seconded by Commissioner Rasplicka that Case No. WZ-97-10, a request for approval of a rezoning from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an outline development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue be approved for the following reasons: 1. The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge and has been properly posted., 2. A rezoning is required to expand the allowed uses., 3. There are some light industrial uses which are appropriate for the area if performance standards are used., 4 All requirements for a PID outline development plan have been met., 5. The applicant has limited objectional uses from C-1, C-2 and I zones by the use of performance standazds. With the following conditions: That semi-trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and deliveries Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica Page 9 only. 2. No shift work be allowed between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m . 3. The two eastern buildings be limited to a 35 IiP maximum for any one machine. 4. The two western buildings be limited to a 40 HP maximum for any one machine. 5. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., be allowed to outside walls and no attachment of cranes or lifts be allowed on the roof. A friendly amendment was suggested by Commissioner Thompson and accepted by Commissioners Cerveny and Rasplicka, that the word "no" be added under Performance Standard #2 so it reads "No long-term parking ofsemi-trucks and trailers". Motion carries 6-1 with Commissioner Thompson voting no. Commissioner Thompson stated for the record that she voted no because it was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. She continued to say that there are other areas designated in the City for industrial uses and that the City review industrial uses so that they can come up with a land use category that tazgets these types of uses but are not required to be in industrial zones. A motion was made by Commissioner Cerveny, seconded by Commissioner Brinkman, for approval of a fmal development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue for the following reasons: 1. All maximum requirements of the zoning code have been met., 2. All requirements for a PID final development plan have been met., 3. The applicant has limited objectional uses from the C-1, C-2 and I zones by the use of performance standazds., With the following conditions: 1. If the variance is approved, the plan be revised accordingly., 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. Motion carried 6-1 with Thompson voting no. A motion was made by Commission Cerveny, seconded by Rasplicka for approval of five foot sign setback vaziance for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the reduced request would not prove to be a hazazd to the public health, safety and welfare., 2. It would not have a negative impact on property values or the public welfaze., 3. The proposed location is more aesthetically pleasing than other locations meeting setbacks., Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica Page 10 4. There are similar signs in the area with same setbacks and size. With the following conditions: I. A building permit be applied for and issued prior to the existing sign being completed., 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. - Motion carried 7-0. IX. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff concludes that rezoning from C-1 to PID is required to allow the developer more flexibility in leasing tenant space. Staff further concludes that although industrial-type uses are not specifically allowed in the "Office/Retall" definition in the Kipling Activity Center Master Plan, there are some light industrial uses which are appropriate for the area if performance standards are used. Therefore, a recommendation of approval is given for the outline deve]opment plan with the following conditions; With the following conditions: 1. Semi-trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and deliveries only., 2. No shift work be allowed between the hours 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., 3. The two eastern buildings be limited to a 35 HP maximum for any one machine., 4. The two western buildings, be limited to a 40 HP maximum for any one machine., 5. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., to outside walls and no attachments such as crane or lifts be allowed on the roof, 6. If Council wishes to further limit the allowed uses in Buildings `A' and `B', staff would recommend that #9 on the outline plan be designated as only being allowed in Buildings `C' and `D' or the maximum horsepower be limited to 20 in the eastern two buildings (buildings `A' and `B')., 7. #2 under Performance Standards should read "No long term parking ofsemi-trucks and trailers." A recommendation of approval is given for the final development plan with the following conditions: 1. If the variance is approved, the plan be revised accordingly. 2. No other freestanding signs be_allowed on the property. •< Planning Division Staff Report Case No. WZ-97-10/Pacifica Page 11 In regard to the request for variance, Staff has concluded that approval of the reduced request would not prove a hazard to the public health, safety and welfaze, nor would it have a negative impact on property values. Because the proposed location is more aesthetically pleasing than other locations meeting setbacks, a recommendation of Approval is given with the following conditions: 1. A building permit be applied for and issued prior to the existing sign being completed. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. X. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS OUTLINE DEVEL.OPMFNT PL N Option A: "I move that Council Bill No. , a request for approval of rezoning from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an outline development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. A rezoning is required to expand allowed uses. 2. There aze some light industrial uses which aze appropriate for the area if performance standards are used. 3. All requirements for a PID outline development plan have been met. With the following conditions 1. Semi-trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and deliveries only. 2. No shift work be allowed between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.. 3. The two most eastern buildings be limited to a 35 HP maximum for any machine. 4. The two western buildings be limited to a .40 HP maximum for any one machine. 5. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., to outside walls or roof will be permitted and no attachments such as cranes or lifts be allowed on the roof . 6. Item #9 on the outline plan be eliminated from Buildings `A' and `B'. 7. #2 under Performance Standards should read "No long term parking ofsemi-trucks and trailers." Option B: "I move that Council Bill No. _, a request for approval of rezoning from Commercial- One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an outline development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be Denied for the following reasons: 1. 2. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:- September 8, 1997 Page -11-- Mayor Wilde stated that he will veto Items A B C D E F and G; he will provide a letter. Item 6. Resolution 1623 - referring a ballot question to the voters of the City at the November 4, 1997, General Municipal Election, concerning revenue in excess of constitutional limitations received in the fiscal year ending December 31, 1996. Resolution 1623 was introduced by Mrs. Worth; title read by the Clerk. Motion by Mrs. Worth for approval of Resolution 1623; seconded by Mr. Solano. Motion by Mr. Solano to amend to add "or the Teen Center"; seconded by Mr. DiTullio; carried 7-0. Original Motion as amended carried 6-i with Mrs. Dalbec voting no. Meeting adjourned at 12:12 a.m. September 15, 1997 -Continued Meeting from September 8, 1997. Mayor Wilde called the continued meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Councilmembers present: Teri Dalbec (arrived at 6:05 p.m.), Jerry DiTullio, Don Eafanti, Jean Fields, Janelle Shaver, Ken Siler (arrived at 6:09 p.m.), Tony Solano, and Claudia Worth. Also present: City Clerk, INarida Sang; Ciry Treasurer, Jim Malone; Acting City Manager, Bob Goebel; Ciry Attorney, Gerald Dahl; Director of Parks, Gary Wardle; staff; and interested citizens. - ` ':~ Item 3. Council Bill 39 - An Ordin~nc~ providing for the approval of rezoning from ~{"~ ~ ~~- Commercial-One to Planned industrial Development District and for approval of an Outline Development Plara on land located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. (Case No. WZ-97-10) (Pacifica Holding Company LLC) Council Bill 39 was introduced on second reading by Mrs. Worth; title read by the Clerk; Ordinance No. 1096 assigned. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: September 8, 1997 Page -12- Mike Kendall, representing Pacifica Holding Company, gave summary of the project. Motion by Mrs. Dalbec to suspend the Rules and allow Council more than two times to speak; seconded by Mrs. Shaver; failed 4-4 with Councilmembers Worth, Eafanti, Shaver, and Dalbec voting yes. (This needed 6 votes to pass) Meredith Reckert was sworn in by the Mayor and presented the staff report and showed slides of the property. Motion by Mrs. Worth that Council Biil_39 (Ordinance 1096), a request for approval of rezoning from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an outline development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. A rezoning is required to expand allowed uses. 2. There are some light industrial uses which are appropriate for the area if performance standards are used. 3. All requirements for a PID outline development plan have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Semi-trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and deliveries only. 1. A. All semi-tractors may not be parked no more than one hour before 'loading or unloading or one hour after loading or unloading. 1. B. No overnight parking will be allowed of semi-trucks. 2. No shift work be allowed between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 3. The two eastern buildings be limited to a 5 HP maximum for any one machine. 4. The two western buildings be limited to a 40 HP maximum for any one machine. 5. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., to outside walls will be permitted and no attachments such as cranes or lifts be allowed on the roof. 6. Item #9 on the outline plan be eliminated from Buildings 'A' and 'B'. 7. Include the idling section in the diesel emissions ordinance. Seconded by Mrs. Dalbec; carried 7-1 with Mrs. Dalbec voting no. Motion by Mrs. Worth that the request for approval of a final development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. All maximum requirements of the zoning code have been met. 2. All requirements for a PID final development plan have been met. With the following conditions: 1. (f the variance is approved, the plan be revised accordingly. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property; seconded by Mr. Solano; carried 7-1 with Mrs. Dalbec voting no. Motion by Mrs. Worth that the request for afive-foot sign setback variance for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue be approved for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the reduced request wold not prove a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare. 2. It would not have a negative impact on property values or the public welfare. 3. Proposed location is more aesthetically pleasing than other locations meeting setbacks. CITY COUNCIL MINIITES:' September 8, 1997 Page -13- With the following conditions: 1. A building permit be applied for and issued prior to the existing sign being completed. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property; seconded by Mr. Solano. Motion by Mrs. Worth to amend her motion to have condition 2. read: No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property with the exception of tenant identification signs not to exceed 10 ft in height nor 50 square feet; seconded by Mrs. Dalbec; failed 3-5 with Councilmembers Shaver, Worth and Dalbec voting yes. Vote on original motion carried 7-1 with Mr. DiTullio voting no. ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING Item 4. Council Bill 45 - An Ordinance establishing the salary for the elected positions • of Mayor, members of Council, City Clerk, and City Treasurer, of the City of Wheat Ridge, during the term of office commencing November 10, 1997; and ~~~ repealing Ordinance 1009, Series of 1995. Council Bill 45 was introduced on first reading by Mr. Solano; title read by the Clerk. Motion by M[. Solano that Council Bill 45 be approved on first reading, ordered published, public hearing be set for Monday, October 13, 1997, at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and if approved on second reading, take effect 15 days after final publication; that as an additional provision the staff be directed to prepare a chart to address salaries for the four-year terms; seconded by Mrs. Dalbec; carried 6-2 with Councilmembers Siler and DiTullio voting no. DECISIONS. RESOLUTIONS. AND MOTIONS Item 5. West 48th Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Management Project approval. Item 7. Bid Award for Miscellaneous Remodel Project (RFQ #007-97). Item 8. Approval of Expenditure Items. Item 9. CONSENT AGENDA A. Bid Award for Telephone Equipment & Installation (RFP #97-004). B. Bid Award for chemical fertilizer (Mapo bid #007-96). ~ ~. )1i 1TRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEiVIBER Dalbe_c Council Bill No. 39 ORDPIANCE NO. 1096 Series of 1997 TITLE: AN ORDIi LANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF REZONING FROM COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PL?u~TNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON LAND LOCATED.AT 900 FVEST 49TH AVENUE, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, THAT: ect n . ~ Clpon application by Pacifica Holding Company LLC for approval of a rezoning in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Case No. WZ-97-10 and pursuant to findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, Wheat Ridge maps aze hereby amended .to exclude from the Commercial-One district, and to include in the Planned industrial Development district the following described land: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of 70 Executive Center Amended Subdivision, City of Wheat Ridge, County of ' ' Jefferson, State of Colorado. Section 2 Conditions. I. The following uses are allowed: All RC1, R-C and C-1 uses except the following: Adult 2. • ..3, __ 4 ... 5. 7. 8. 9. entertainment facilities, automobile and light-duty truck sales and rental, auto sernce and repazr shops, hotels and motels, mortuaries and crematories, motor fueling stations, drive-in restaurants, rooming and boarding houses, lumber yazds, pawn shops, taverns and night clubs, theaters. Additional permitted uses: Research laboratories, retail and wholesale sales of equipment, supplies and materials for use in agricultural, mining industry, business, transportation, building and construction, school for industrial or business training, printing and engraving, wholesale businesses, manufacturing, processing and wazehousing, light industrial operations, wazehousing with light vehicular traffic, building contractors service shop. Semi-trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and deliveries only. All service tractors may not be parked more than one hour before loading or unloading or one hour after loading or unloading. No over night pazking ofsemi-trucks may be allowed. No outside storage be allowed. No shift work occur between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.. The two eastern buildings be limited to a 5 HP maximum for any one machine. The two western buildings be limited to a 40 HP maximum for any one machine. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., to outside walls or roof will be permitted. No woodworking businesses will be allowed. Item #9 on outline plati (shops for custom work or for making articles, materials, or commodities to be sold for retail on the premises) shall not be allowed in the eastern buildings (buildings `A' and `B'). r . Page 2 Ordinance~io. ]096 10. Use of the property shall conform to Wheat Ridge, Code of Laws, section 13-2~ Diesel-powered engine and 1~-26(e) Offensive Dischazges. ecf Vested P~nnP*~ Riohts Approval of this rezoning does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26(c) of Appendix A of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 4. SafPrv clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfaze of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfaze. The City Council further determines that the ordirrance beazs a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. ecti eve ' 'tv If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be judged by a court of competent jurisdiction •invalid, such judgement shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder of this ordinance or its application too er persons circumstances. ect' 'Kris ordinance shall take effect 1~ days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ. MIDI i~0ew~spaper of general circulation inf the City of Wh a Ridge anAd Est, 1997, ordered published r P ouncillCharnbersa 7500 West 29th Avenue~sWheat Ridge, Colorado.' 1997, at 7:00 o'clock p.m.> in e C READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of 7 to 1, this 15th day of September, 1997. SIGNED by the Mayor on this 23rd day of September, 1997. ~ i~~-~-'- J DAN WILDE, MAYOR ATTEST: Wanda Sang, Ciry Clerk ~ AS TO FO C Y GE D DAHL, CITY ORNEY 1st Publication: August 22, 1997 2nd Publication: September 26, 1997 Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: October 11, 1997 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Dalbec Council Bill No. 39 ORDINANCE NO. 1096 Series of 1997 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF REZONING FROM COMMERCIAL -ONE TO PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON LAND LOCATED AT 9500 WEST 49TH AVENUE, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Upon application by Pacifica Holding Company LLC for approval of a rezoning in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Case No. WZ -97 -10 and pursuant to findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, Wheat Ridge maps are hereby amended to exclude from the Commercial -One district, and to include in the Planned industrial Development district the following described land: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of 70 Executive Center Amended Subdivision, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Section 2. Conditions. 1. The following uses are allowed: All RC 1, R -C and C -1 uses except the following: Adult entertainment facilities, automobile and light -duty truck sales and rental, auto service and repair shops, hotels and motels, mortuaries and crematories, motor fueling stations, drive -in restaurants, rooming and boarding houses, lumber yards, pawn shops, taverns and night clubs, theaters. Additional permitted uses: Research laboratories, retail and wholesale sales of equipment, supplies and materials for use in agricultural, mining industry, business, transportation, building and construction, school for industrial or business training, printing and engraving, wholesale businesses, manufacturing, processing and warehousing, light industrial operations, warehousing with light vehicular traffic, building contractors service shop. 2. Semi- trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and deliveries only. All service tractors may not be parked more than one hour before loading or unloading or one hour after loading or unloading. No over night parking of semi - trucks may be allowed. 3. No outside storage be allowed. 4. No shift work occur between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.. 5. The two eastern buildings be limited to a 5 HP maximum for any one machine. 6. The two western buildings be limited to a 40 HP maximum for any one machine. 7. No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., to outside walls or roof will be permitted. 8. No woodworking businesses will be allowed. 9. Item 99 on outline plan (shops for custom work or for making articles, materials, or commodities to be sold for retail on the premises) shall not be allowed in the eastern buildings (buildings `A' and `B'). Ordinance No. 1096 Page 2 10. Use of the property shall conform to Wheat Ridge, Code of Laws, section 13 -25 Diesel - powered engine and 15 -26(e) Offensive Discharges. Section 3. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this rezoning does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26(c) of Appendix A of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 4. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 5. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be judged by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgement shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder of this ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 11 th day of August, 1997, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for September 8, 1997, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of 7 to 1, this 15th day of September, 1997. SIGNED by the Mayor on this 23rd day of September, 1997. ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk DAN WILDE, MAYOR HIM 1st Publication: August 22, 1997 2nd Publication: September 26, 1997 Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: October 11, 1997 ^ s A 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, QQ=80275-6773 ... _ . (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax k 234-5924 October 14, 1997 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Mike Kendall Pacifica Holding Company, LLC 5350 South Roslyn Street #240 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Dear Mike: The City of - -~UVheat Ridge Please be advised that your request for a rezoning from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue was approved by the City Council on September 8, 1997 pursuant to Case No. WZ-97-10. -Conditions of approval were as follows: Outline Development Plan: 1. All semi-trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and deliveries only. A. All semi-tractors may be parked no more than one hour before loading and unloading or one hour after loading or unloading. B. No overnight parking will be allowed of semi-trucks. 2. No shift work be allowed between the hours of IO:OO p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 3. The eastern building be limited to a 5 HP maximum for any one machine. 4. The two western buildings be limited to a 40 HP maximum for any one machine. 5- No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts, etc., to outside walls will be permitted and no attachments such as cranes or lifts be allowed on the roof. 6. Item #9 on the outline plan be eliminated from Buildings `A' and `B' 7. That the idling section for diesel emissions of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws be included. These items should be included as notes on the outline plan. I would also request that item numbers 1 and 7 be added to the final development plan as well. Final Development Plan 1. If the vaziance is approved, the plan be revised accordingly. ~~ RECYCLED PAPER "` ; ~ ~ ~ 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. Variance 1. A building permit be applied for and issued prior to the existing sign being completed. 2. No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property. Attached you will fmd a copy of Ordinance No.1096, as well as a copy of the September 8 minutes. The conditions listed above need to be incorporated into the respective documents. Once this is done, blackline photographic mylars with original signatures must be submitted for recording with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder's Office. Should you have any questions regazding this information, do not hesitate to cont2ct me at 235- 2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert Senior Planner cc: WZ-97-10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to beheld before the City of Wheat Ridge CITY COUNCIL on September 8, 1997, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heazd: Case Nn WZ-97-5: An application by Pacifica Holding Company, L.L.C_, for Pacifica Development Properties, II, LLC, for approval of a Planned Industrial Development final development plan and plat with a variance. Said property is located at 9500 West 49th Avenue and is legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of 70 Executive Center Amended Subdivision, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. 2, Case Nn ZOA-97-8• _ An application by the City of Wheat Ridge to consider a proposed amendment to the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Chapter 26, Zoning Code relating to residential densities and development standards. 3. Case No WPA-97-1: An application by the City of Wheat Ridge to consider proposed amendments to the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Development Plan relating to residential densities and development standazds and the Future Land Use Map for residential development. ~~ ~ e 'fer Ro he, Recording Se tary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be Published: August 22, 1997 Wheat Ridge Transcript _ . ~~, ~+~ ~-~ r~ 1 ;r~~~+r~~ ..-. r.t-mT.~ a~r~rs-~~r~~a, _ _ _ _ iTl~7~'~'~ 'rr~ - TI 4 z LAS a DRIP N OOMMENCING A NOR,HEAS~ GORNER of THE ;i'W lid, C7F THE - PAC/F/CA DEI~ELOPMENT PROPENT/ES LLC SE ?t4, OF Tr1E ~J`J .i4 0!` SECTION ;5, T.+,S, R6~W, OF THE ~ ~.I1r~, iU THENCE 5 00-03`22" E, A;-aNG .THE EAST LINE 0= SAID ,"J'JJ 14. aF i!! THE SE I14, OF 7HE ,,>Jd I%4 OF SECTION i5, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 h- ~ FEET 70 THE RIGHT"-OF-WAY OF iNEST 9TH AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON ~ PLANNED /NDUSTi9/AL CJE{~ELOPMENT 96 s366 E THE RECORDED PLAT ~ ~ ~ P ' 'C` ~ ~~°nr r~ 0. INDEP NDEN.,E UX~~,u , ~E CJP, iC~ PARK, Q ,AND ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CO!~!TlNUiP~G ~ ~ - O G SAD EAS ~ ~.iNE> A. DDS ~ ANOE OF ..2~x.62 F;_~. ~ ~ O ~ r-'~,--~. ~ - F/NAL DEI~ELOPM"ENT PLAN THE NORTI-,~RLY RIGh'T-aF-WAY LINE OF IfNrrE~RSTATE ?0 AS - RECORDED IN BO0?C li;4o, AT PAGE 7~~ OF THE RECORDS J7=~ .IEFFERSON COUNTY, rHENCE N alrar!w> W ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WA'Y LINE FOR INTERSTATE ?0 A DiSTAfwCE OF ~.?O5~C3 ~2Nt~_A~!~_l~_-_--______<_~'~~ FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT- F-?~ ~ E 1 ~ ~ ~ 'n ~ 0 JAY ~..NE ~,F iNDE. E'v~,EN~,E O STREET AS SNOV~I,N ON THE RECORDED PLAry OF INDEPENDENCE -_49TTI~ AVE, ~ EXECUTIVE OFFICE PARK, THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT ~OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES ~ ° <C N 45"0251" J+l A D{SrA.NCE O~~ 45 rEE", ~ 2. N 00°02'5!' W A DISTANCE OF 398,12 FEET, T 3. N 4~4-5T09° E A DISTANCE OF I~.iO FEET TO A POINT C);N r!~E r ' C ~~iIJ?v'T~~ ~ ~ , SOUTH{-~ RfGNT-of-VJAI' of V`JEST 4~9TN AVENUE THENCE N 8`~~4;r'?~Cj° ~ E ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DIET : ~ , I- ANC. OF b<0.3, °s Q.~ FEE ~ TO THE POINT QF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 303,601 SQUARE ~ y °rc r,~~ FEET OR b.9697 ACRES MORE OR LESS, ALL USES ALLOWED U OF "'HE FOL G.Od~i'VG U I, ADDi~ i ENTER"`A1NME NO 6G,41.~ VdHEAT RIDGE CODE t AUTOr~~1O81LE A.ND L ' t AUTO SER'uICE AND ~ swops, AUTO AND UG ~ TUNE-UP S>-?oPS, ENGir a ALIGNMENT SERV?CES, i t ~ ~ 1 t ZC";~p; R-C t RADIATOR REPAIR SHt t XDNED; A.-I 0 4. HOTELS, MoTELs, ow TRANSIENT OCCUPA^.C •w• •waasw wa~ww w.o ww ~lw~awwa~rwwwawawwoaa~+wwwaw~r• wwwa~ww ®ww waa ww wawsww~ww®eowww •w~~ww~maawww~www~aawwa•~wewir~wwa~o~ww wa~• w ~ 5. MORTUARIES AND C ~ DF b0' -R-Q~W ~ ~ _ ~HaaN oN auc~;<M~s ~ TD REMAIN. 6. MOTOR DUELING S i ~ _ CsARDEN PLACE. rJ -T~~ ~oa~ 2, PAGE 3 7. DRIVE-IN RESTAURAP J ~ A ~ w' 1. ~..ES~ _ 0 ~ , ~ POINT . 8. ROOMING AND SOAK q~,------.-----._...._.__ ~ _ _._s__.~__ r.____. _e ~ 9, LUMBER YARDS, •w• ~ .w~.ww.rnrww..w...•ww~rww.r.,.www.,..rwwaw~•r.aarewwaarwwaw~r•rwwawwwwa,~•wwarr®•..warwwwarw•w w. ww +.rrr~,~w+rw~r. _ M _ _ 431 3~ - j w 184 0T w aar. w r aaw w w 1 a. PAWN SH1CP.~7. - - v__ t I jam, ~~~~i~ia;~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i ~ i ° ~l i I I° -~~~,i~ 3. t a ~ - NEW b' µICaR 1 i ~ I I i ~ i I 11 ~ I I ~ I ( I I I 1~ ° ~~oi~i.-~ ,~,1~,~~1 ~ ~~I~ CEDAR -r~ i ! l~ ~ I I I ~ ~ i ~ ~ I ! ~ t ( ~ I( 1 1 1 ~ f Ih TA l~RNS, NiGH I FLU ~ i` l i i i i , I t i ~ i l k ~ ~ I I ~ENC Ar I~ i I 1 ~ ! ,lei ~ ~ ~ I I I i i ~I 'L i I i ~ i PROPERT i ~ ~ i ~ c I i i G 10~ UT. ITY ~ ~ ~ A I I Y, 1 a ~ t LANE PG. 16 , T ~ P , ~ ~ . _r ~ ASP++AL'~ PARKIN ~ ~ d t _ ASPi~ALT P i I ARKNG 13,'VOO,~ t~JORKiNG BU, t ~ 1 L?~ AND DRIVES 1 - r'~ ~ ~ AND DRIVES I i ~ , I l i i I i ~ , t I i i i i 1 I ~ I ~ ~ j ~ I ~ l I 11,~ a ~ I i ~ j~ I i I 1 ! ~ ~ ~ I ~ i A T~ ra r t ~ t ~ l li ~ I i i I I I ~ I ~ I ~ i I i I I I I ~~I ~QwL~.. ~ ERMITTE~ ir__~___ ~ I I ~ 1 i I t I i r ~ i_.1~..~~L I I ~ i ~ I ~ l i l I ~ i I ;I - u_.s._.~..rL.~ i..1-_.i_ _u_~__L_i__~___~ 1 t lVL_L._1_l._1_1___1_ ~._i__.1 ~ ~ C ~ _ _ - - ~ , ~ ~ r ~ _ -~--L--~--~ ~ * NO ADDITIONAL PERK _ ( ~ - 1 I - ~~=r - I~~~~ ~J U ~1 L I ~~iil ~ 'I~, ~ r---_~..__-____...____-. OCCuR BETWEEN THE I r ` t 1I------- i ~ _ t I ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ d p f, RESEARCH LABORATt t ~ ' d FACILITIES FOR RE _ ~ SEA ~ ~ CONDUCTED BY OR FOi 1 i__~ ill?I 0 ~ ~ CONCERN, WHETHER PL t ~ 1 t ~ u~,~cor ~ A. -tri p ~ n~- ~„n❑n❑ noocGZ~o~,❑o❑ ❑QO❑cocoGar , ,,r~~ u ~u..~.:Cl❑JCOOC]pCJCC'(7C(7❑uL.`~._ tC.CC7~! `Cl:,r70GC7~7[7r❑ !StU~ ❑C70❑❑C7nG❑❑G[]0❑IGUGi rr- n E3 i _---t ❑~n o ❑ a ❑ c~ aconu ❑nuan©nn.,.z~a❑~❑n❑❑oa❑oooaoao ~ r t ~ ~ ~n G°I~c ❑ rnt^~ ❑ ❑ 0 ~ ❑ ~ ~ ❑ pn opra~ opo ~ ~ 2 RE. AiL AND UJHOLE'S, ~ ❑ n ~ q Q AND A~ATERIALS DESIGP p ~ n ~ r; t , x GRIOu~ ~ URE, MINING, 1 i t a o 0 TRANSPORTATION, BUlL s t ' 1 ° ttr ° ~ I I EXCLUDING THE ~1"ORA r 1 _ ~ I ~ II ~ -e ~i HEAVY-WHEELED OR TR I tI ❑ ~ c~ w f+~ ~ I ~ w w~ t ~ ~ DUI i ~ D NCz ~ ~ 4 _ a ~ 3. SCHOOL t a 1 ~ 4 S FOR INDUS t ❑ z ~ ❑ ❑ ~ W 4. PRINTING; ENGRA.'JINL ❑ ❑ _ I' ~ ❑ ❑ a REPRODUCTION PROCE; 1 ❑ ❑ t I ° a ~ ~ ( ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ 4 ❑ ~ WHOLESALE 8~~,,INES'~ i!! i M 1 l i ~ I I ~ 6, MANUFA T' ' 1 ~ ~ I , ~ , , ~ ~ ~ t4 C uRING, PRC - _ ~ ~ i I ~ i ~ ! I ~ 1 i h-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ COMBINATION THEREOF t 1 1 ~ I I t I t i ---I ~ ~C~t~ T TRUCK ~ I ~m~ w ~ _ I I ~ t N~ z m~ - ~ f i A. lN,~TRUME ~ F ~ C N, I RET T ,n ~ , ~ 0 r ~u r u , ~ )!1 ~ ' i PARK PAD I I ~ i _ 0 i i I ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ i , ! ; ! ~ ; A ~ ~ ~ N PHoroGRAPH,IC, oPT1CJ , i i ~ ~ RKING PAD I _ ' Q ti ~ ' ' I~ ~ , ;I ~ i' II I' 1 w ~ I ~ .I ~ I 1 ~ 1 ~ , I , I ~ ~ 4, I 1 W - ~ I ' B RICAa. MACNI y~~y( t PaINr ~ .a.. 5 a9°;3~~~`~ ~ } I t ..{t._.__..~~. (r] - ,.w..w.~.w sdl~lw~a w.aa wra.ar... w-wae..w.w www~ sw.w~.,.w w•.erw~.w.., tea. ItI ~RR ~ ~ ~4~,~e ~ ; ; C. uGNT INDUSTRIAL C ~ ~ t.. ~ ~ ~ >C I ANY ONE M1~iACHINE i ~ DOE _ _ 1~ t t ~ ~ ! ~ - HORSEPOWER, tFORTY ~ t t..~"o< ~ I ' "t5' CRD" ^ ~ w w - ~ ~ w w 5 89 3$ 23 W ~ AND 'D'?, PROVIDED THAI ~ ~ a~ AC~..EoS, i~ ..w w • w..w w . w~.. w war w I ~ ' a i ~ ~ 184.(00' tl? - N ~ ~ -1 ~1vGf2E~5-EGi~2E6u ASPHALT PARKINCS ~0' WAl'ER ?°1AIN j I l5' 1J~ 1 ~ ~ TRA5N 1 DUST, EMISSION OF HEA i EAS;;"1EN4, NCLO uRE r s FUMES ARE PRODUCE) t ( AND DRIVES - ~ t I ~ ENCL,a R;: ARKING - ASPI~ALT P ! r~ DANGEROUS, HAZARDOI t _ ~ ' REASONABLE EN.JOYMEP ~ -f ~ ~ f i I AND DRIVES ~ ~ , ROPERTIE~a, ~ORSEp01 ~_._-~-_T~ I I i , / I ~25' C 0~5 ACCil88! i i ~ t f ~ ~ ~ ~ PR Vf 0 DED NOISE, DUS ~ , ~ ~ ~ I J I i` i ~ ~ ~ I i - ~ ~ LNG, M3 EGRESS 1 I ~ ! ~ I A I T .r. i i ~ I ~E~, I 1 ~ ~ ! _ I' I ~ j I I i I ~ ~ ~ ~ I, I I RES i RI C ,IONS ARE ME - i I ~ - . 1 1 i i I I 1 4 ~ ~ ~ I t I I i i APPRO'JED ON A CASE-f t - ~ ~ ~ ~ . J 1 i ~ ~ I~ ~ I ~ - - WHEAT P - RIDGE DE A T~ R. I h~ I I e DEVEL P I"r - - OMEN. STAr°F, ~ ~ 0 g ~ _ Ii ❑ . _ u ~ t i ~ I t a 7. WAREHOUSING 'W1T~1 LI G_,.._-__.~_ n N ~ ~ ~ - ❑ ~ Q °0 8, OMITTED -f C~ _ C ~ ~ t 1 ~ ( ctoao❑oonoc ❑ 1 r ~ ~ ~ C n 9, N P, SOS R 'f' ti r `+~P o Cl.,,,,T ❑ 0 v o ( n,~~..~u~C,u~nnCro❑as❑nc_ ir.;aGOn~aaaaa~ac;G❑❑❑~ ~ ~ ~'t ° 141AT o, I ~ ~ ~ _ 1 ~ ERiALS,':~R COMMOC ~ fl l~l ~i I N ~ ~ ~ - t3 ~ ~ THE PREMISES, AND ',NHE - - _ o a~ a ~.F C i t ~ - o cn ❑ THtIRTY-FIVE ,35) NOR REF H r.~. ~ - _ ❑ ~ ~ ❑ ~ f T i ~ ~x ~ ~ ~ ~ BUILDING ~ ' r~ ~ _ ~ S C A 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ❑ ~ r ~ 'vD D. I ~ 'C~~.~...,1 ❑Cp- ~,~G ,aC~ ❑ G~ ❑ Ou❑0 ~rr~~, - r~ ©.a L~(~Ci _tl+~ G r" t, t ~ ~ _ gran❑❑non❑c_iar.uaacoGr?aon❑nnnca~i❑~.~,~no❑oraa❑GCann❑oun❑c~ ~ t~ pp ❑ ~XCESoiVE NOISE; ViBRA ~ ~ ~ 9 ° 1 GLARE, RAD!ATEON: SMOk C] _ (NI ~ _ ❑❑.aoaGuonu,~orao❑❑oo❑onnoonnca ~ - ~ HE =XTENT THAT !T ~S D GUO;~ar~u..nr~oc.,~~u 1 ~ ~ - I ~ ~ NUISANCE TO THE REAS( o ~ ttt i r ~ . " ~ ~ ~ ~QSp ---r~..-_. 1 1 AD.IA.CEN . PROPS ~ IES. i~~ ~ { rQ ~~'Rk! ~ - v O~ JE CUS t O,vl WORD; ~ ~ ND !3 ~ _ _ PREMISES, NO ~';N o ~ S ' ~ ~ f ~ ~ RI _ ~ ~ GCE M>~ ,e~ h i I ~ I ~ f r `''~T ~ } I- NORSEP W ~ s ~ SO' -R-o-u1 ~ ~ i ~ ~ pp ~ ER, PROJ3Dr_-D ~ ~ , I i ~ ~ 1 r I , ~ r--- fir-- V~BRAT{ON, BUST. EM±SSI( ~ AS $NOIIkJ ON JUCH4EM'$ ~ r.,,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,I ~ F ~ _ l~jl~ ' ~ " ' [1) t ~ ~ ~ ~ _ f , CARD • ar I t i I i - _ / l1 ~ .J ~ Ji I(I - J ~ > EN PLACE. w"+~,.,, ~ ~ t I ~ ~ r ~ i~~ ~1 ! ~ S't~C?KE, OR , z~~h~5 ARE F ~ BO®K 2, PAGE 3 ~ ~ t i ExIS~ING. " ~ ~ ~ ~T~ , IS DANGEROUS. HAZA ( ~ ~ , 1 r ~ ~ 28' GRCBS A~.CE38/~ 12'->0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t"?" ~ ~ REASONAB~.~ ENS ~ aye a ~ r i t , ~ ( _ ~ i 1 + i ~ ,~`-J~"~°.'.. _ ~.d QYMEN ~ w--._ ~ _ 'sr. ~ iNGieE~3 - EG~E38 -fi- - I f I ~ PROPERTIES. HoRSEPO+>n ~ +~r ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ( , m ; ` ~ ~ r i r ~ t ~ ! 1` ~ NEW 6 NIG}~ROVIDED NOISE, DUST -o "I ~~-r--;_y ' f ~ I 1 ~ ! I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i t` j ~ ~ ~ cE1~AR RESTRICTIONS ARE ME1' , . A_ ~ r ""r„'*~,,,,n . ~ ,r C ~ I 5p>L~~.T ONCE ~5,~; w ~ r ' ~ P - ,Q PPROVED ON A. CASE-B / ~ 81~ i r ~ RK ~ PRGPER71'A o. / ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ©Rty~g , LINE J+MEAT RIDGE DEPARTME ;wxi~rlNG ~ ~RONrAGE ROAD, ~ _ 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~5,~'~' i I ~ ~ I ! I I DEVELOPMENT STAFF. _ ~w i ~ ~ - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r I ci. I i i ( r` r ~ o ~ ~ f gym,. W , f *"~aa % 0A ""+5rr ; 1 -Zz - 80l S/S ROOM = 15,292 SF = 25.5 SPACES _ - 0 BUILDING B 40% OFFICE = 6,560 SF = 32.8 SPACES JE FERS,C7N CCU TY_C' ER AIND_RECOR E . 3 POINT 60% S/S ROOM = 9,841 SF = 164 SPACES o ZONED: A-1 BUILDING C - 40% OFFICE = 11,739 SF = 58.7 SPACES - 60% S/S ROOM a 177,608 SF 29.3 SPACES DEPUTY Q NORTH *1 TE PL A N BUILDING D 20% OFFICE = 8,331 SF 41,7 SPACES LANDSCAPED AREA - 80`S S/S ROOM = 33,326 SF = 55.5 SPACES H v a TOTAL = 279.0 SPACES a 1n - 40 -0 CD z PARKING PROVIDED 61*-ET HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE 8 SPACES cc 0 STANDARD (9X19') 286 SPACES FDP1 i:5 I DOCK SPACES 39 SPACES TOTAL 333 SPACES 1i'r~ is~r :r Sa T OP 5 ns~k. NEW 1 PAC/F/CA DEVELOPMENT PRt~PERT/~S LLC PLANNED /NDUSTH/AL DE7~ELOPMENT G_ F/NAL DEI/ELOFibf~i"JT f'iAoi+' 4i wi ' ! ~ t, l ~ a, I.4 lii . #.i w,, ~ 1 ~ ~u;~ _ „ _ , w ~ . ~ ` w, ~ - , _ t r~ ~ ~ ~n , ~ . ~ ~ . s< - ~ ~x _ _ F r ~ _ _ _ p 4 r~ ..-z - , f ~ - F r _ _ ~ c ~ _ ,u - _ - ~ t - _ - t rv ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 1 ' _ I~ ~ ~SI ~ a 1 ' E . ~ ' / \ ,c4'" ~ _ ~ r Cis.', ~ ~ ~ _ ttx e1 JM h ` N~ yy 1 } A K (Lfy` t F,., u n . _ _ , t iY. _ t, s_ ~ ' ~ n.b~ ~ ~ ~a ~ k p ~ m -a1 ~ i 1 _ _ - _ - ` ~7; v ~ r + i.. ~ I rte. i.,~ I w i .n { ~ ! ~ ..~5 - ~ ~ j f. ~1 h; ~ ~i ~ ~ i E~ i ~ ~ _ i~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ w ~ ~'Mz~ ~ 1 ~ P r+ r, ~ ` ~ ~ , i`L ~ w ~ WM a ~.Y- i n i= ~L......._'.____ _...y ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ j ~s 1A"A ~ ~ ~ .._.v _ i A 4 f s ~ SIR ~ w i. h i ~ ~ C ~ } t ~ i ~ i i ~ s ~ tj ~ 3 ~ E _ ~ f ~ Z !`d q f o ~s ~ H i x U ' S " r. } t F l Y r', r, ~ ~'~c1. f i ~ ~ ~ MU~.~r _ ~ z~ ~ i ~ I _ - _ - _ ! _ ~ ~ ~ .v ~ r ~ i s , ~ i' 'Y -"4WSFflctat'rwt4ewMCaa:'~.,,.v5=r.x~iSE'Kw, w.,., ..a~a~~r ~Tk' ` .-.T~:>++: ~,.::~~Y~ 1 -,s ~ e 4 - ~ r~ ^sY~`. ..d ~ t_. t1 ~ ~ li ~ ~ t ~ Intl!` I _.__.._.._._.--6~{ f p,{ :~y ~ I,I _ ~ ; .k_ i~ I ~ z ~ ~ ~ l ' ~ I it Iv Ah W ~ ~ r ti ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ u i _ ~ ~ -r'~, w w ...,...i € r ry ~ r,..~ ~a~ ? c,A q ~ ~ r"' , t ~ ~;1 ~ ~ ~+c.,, P'SA _ 3" ,,r ~ , . s `;1~ ~~f~, ~ t e,c.~_.. 4 ~X. ~ ~ 4 ` . _ } h. i ~ ~~j. i ~ , T~, } ~ u f 4~ M y - - .~..~..J.+ u. 44yy yyyy y, ( T ; y ..r _ A r ~ ~ i ~ ~ i y " # k ] y ~ ~ L fu _ o ,4M ~ I F~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - s ~ ~ r y ~ ~ ~ ,r f ~ I. .._S A i~ i _ .t... . 3_ I ' ~Yp _.r. „I f _ _ ~ ~ .1 i . . u w. _ y~ - . x. ~ i Kr 31 f _ ~ ~ ~I lr I~~ - . 't3. ( Y ~ ~ ~ 3 + i ~ ~ ` l N0.: yh __...~.~.._,S„.. ~ F' . , _ ~ 4 i q~ J' ~ i ! I . - s ~ f r`_ ` ~ ~ i s y. ~ t J ~ ~,c E r r, ~ _ ~ ~ i ~ t r . ~ _ aR 1 .7d ~ Y. k . ` ♦ T d " ~I .s f ic~~ 'z-, w Y3 ~ ~ ~ _ s~ fi~ u ~ i ~ ar ; ~ ~z~r; E~ ~ '~~rtf, ~ ate;. _ f: ; ~ - c~ ~ ~ ~~n e k., _ i , a ~ ti ~ r _ _ ~ „r' ~ ti ~ ~ - - ~ t f r i ~s - ~~i 1 ~ _ z y r 4.~ - ~ ' ^ h K ~ ~ k -nom ~ i i ~G v 9 r. _ L _ - .y. _ z t ~ a~ ~-d- r 1-.~ `l. v v k _ ~ r w~ r i ~ wib P. ut' r" 1 " ~ ~ I Ry y ...v } s . i f - ~ ~ i d ' r ~ i y _ ~ . T r s i A 7._ ~ ~ . ~ - F, n ~ ti~ ~ ~fi ,p._ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~, ~ 'U.~~  - c i 1 71 W~ v k b:. 6' a"'Q3Wi': ~A d 9 f r 1p = LANUaCAvro*E P L A N 71 s PAC/F/CA DEVELOPMENT fgf~lOPEf)T/ES LLC ~ _ , ,T 14 RGGF DRAIN G'~ER~LGIU. I RE NFGRGE» ARCM ~ EC ~ URAL 51TE GAST ~GNGRETE WALL PANEL. PA:N ~ 1, PLANNED /NDUSTi9/AL DEI~ELOPMENT 36-3966 E ~ A NIT GTU A' SITE GA"~T G®NGRE?~ u;ALL PANELU _ FAINT P_M 15 SIRE SER'~tiGE GGNNEGTIG'N. 2 REiNFGRC~Q RG E R .r .r.~ r ~ E ' ~ir, a _ i ,T c~_^ lb G~l~i~~iE~-iZ~ 1~GC!~ I.~GGRw'. 3 ~NFGR~.EQ ARG+~i ' EG, uRAL 51 ~ ~ .~,w51 GGNGRE . ~ RW e~IN,NC~ ~,~.~,,t PAN~,~,~ ~ A.av ~ ~ F/NAL DEI~ELOPMENT PLAN 11 TRANSG?~ ili(NIrGsi' '~'~t" U11RE ~LA55. 4 REINFGRGED ARG~+!T>=GTURAL 51TE GAST GGNGRETE SGRE~N LUA~.L PANELS a ~`,~INT 1~-;. 1 ib REGE55ED LION! LNG N SG~iT ~GARD QE`"'GND. 5EE ELEG~'R GAL DRAa1iNG5. 5 GLEAR ANGDIEEQ A'~'u?~INU~! STGREFRGNT DGGRS u! I''' SG~AR ~sR=m4 iNSuLA"E"~'~LA55. R , ~ !9 SLiRFAGc !~GUNTED L;r~+`"!NCz F XT'uR~. 5E>m E°LECTRiGAL DRA.i~!NC~S. ! b GLE~+R ANG,rrI~ED ALU>`?,NuM STGREFRGNT JJ, , SGLAR C~R~EN !NS~LATEC CsLA~~~. u R I Li' 'T A55 i~ ~ ~ ~ 20 >r?ETAL SER'~IGE STA!R5, 5' ta.DE x 5 NICE. , Lr NDGW ~Jt' SGLA, GREEN N5 ED ~ .,;~_~R ~NG:,.~~~..EQ' ~ ALU`^INI~M FRAr1E. p,;r, „ 21 QGGt~ uEALS - A~ 3. A~-3 S METAL SICxN33ANp. 22 RE~IEALS 9 GN~a"IFER 23 ~5° TR,aNS;T!C?N IN QG~'a1?~fSPGt~':. 10 RGGF 13E`"GNp. 24 "FIRE GGM~'ANG RGG""' S!C~NAC~E i.li! F'RE DEPARTMENT APPRGYAL. 11 STANpINCz SEAM METAL RGGF. 25 LGGfC ~GX PER FIRE ~%EF'ARTMENT APPRGvAL. !2 E~PANSIGN JGINT liJ/ ELASTGMERIG SEALANT. 2b C~ENERATGR ENGLGSURE N FGRECxRG';~ND. 21 E~TEN;~ QG~7N5PCJUTS QG~JN NTG SiQEwALK GNA5E. 13 RGGF DRAIN SGUPPER 1 2 4 5 1 ! ' ~ i I 19 I 9 19 19 19 11 11 ~ ~ r ~ ~ j T.G. PANEL r'~ ~ 1 ~ ~ T.Q. DGGR I -j ~ 22 ~ ! ~ 1 2 ' T.G, DGGR FRAM" ___._...v. - 2 ' ~ > > 1 f ~ ~ i i I 2 ~ ' I ~ , ~ 25 FiNISN FLOGR ~ 1 / 1 ~ - - 2 i EL. , 1GG'-~D" _ _ _ ,-_._r_____ ~ . 12 ~ Ilib" , I'„0" 5 4 2 1 I ~ i 19 ! 22 10 19 ! 8 ' IS 19 ~ / \ T.G. PANEL. - 1 ~ - - ~ ~ _3 I 1 _ _ _ __._r . _ _ _ _ . ~ ~ , BG. PANEL f ~ ~ ~ . ~ / i A / _ 1 ~ A ~ A ( ~ ~ 2 _ _ r - T.G. C~LA~{NCs r ~ ~ , ~ - 1 -a i _ ~ _ _ _ _ ~ EL = Ima~_2' ~ - ~ t ~ l ~ ~!N;SN FLGGR 2 ' u - _ _ a ~ ~ ~ r _ _ _ _t__ ,1 _L r , L____J .____1 - ~ l_.___3 C__. ~ l 12 b 5 24 25 2b II{bU a 1'-0e i ! z2 ~ lm ~ 19 I T.a. PANEL 1 i ~ ; r ~ ~ ~T._~_~.._.~_..._ . 7_~_..______,Y._ - 2 - - _--I- _ _ . - T.G. CsLA"ING I 15 - ~ ~Q ~ EL, = ~G~-2`' r l T-~ ~ o o a o o - FiNfSN FLGOR ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EL. A 1G~'-~D i c I J-~ t.. _...J 1...._J l____1 L__ _1 ~____i t_..__1 l._..__a U7 Q 12 b b 13 14 0 m m m 0 Q 1 2? ~ \ T,G, PANEL 1 - - i~ ~ I , 4 Di,~'1E'STER DUMPSTER i EPICi.OSl1RE / ENCLOSURE 2 I- ~-------}-i~ tREAR ~i.EY.) j~ IREAR ~LE~.t % (~,1. Z T,O. CxL AzfNCx - - GLAI-i ZING Lill. o I GL. - 108-1' FN15N FLOOR z _ 7 111 F: IIF: - f _ 1 7 o L. 100'-0'' r• - r~-. f"-'-- - -r-1 r"- ----r-i .a'------- ~ 13 14 ~ 12 H v r cn CD z EAST ELEVATION BUILDING B 3 2 k AJ it = Ilw®11 8 U L PAC/FC EYE N PLANNED /NDII TR/A F/NAL YL lV N~" .9 { P T ~ ® ~ ~ ~i® Ur-r ~n r ~ ri 'iiu is ~iv br "'~-nip i e i~r®iii®® ea ,n® s ~ 7 1 2 4 I I I I I i ! ' I I I 19 Il 9 19 19 10 19 ~ ~ i 1 i' r ~ i, I ~ I . _ . 2 ~ ~_J i ~ ~ , I ~ , ~ I ~ i i ~ / ~ ~ 2 ~ , i 11 - - ~ I i l I ~ j i i i t' i ~ 1 j i 1 _ _ _ _ ..L_r. ~ 7___,._____..__ _______7 r_ r_____________ i _ 7 _ .___._r _a__T _ ______..._7 r_~__~.______ L.._ I C 1 24 25 12 1116" _ 1 1 it 9 11 1 5 r___. 19 ' i r ~ ~ ~ ( 8 I 1 19 1 19 9 19 ~ f l ~ L 1 S , i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ` ~ A I l- ~ I~ I k ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ / ~ , 2 - 1 ! ~ t ~ ( 2 , ~ ' - , t ~ t ~ IS 12 b 5 q~~® 1J161i ~ II~/AH 1 ,2'-~' n u S~-m'~ f TYP. DUMPSTER 6 x b STEEL TUBE. I~UMPSTER 4 ENGLOSURE 4 EQ. SIZEp METAL BATES, ENCL08URE i (FRONT ELE~°,) --EREAi~LE~:}- - E 8' NICsN 1" T~#ICK SITE T. D. PANEL 2 I ~ I .-CAST WALLS. ~ e_ ~ .8" pIAMETER CONCRETE EL. ~ 1C8,_O,t 1 ~ ~ ~ I fILLEp STEEL BOLLARD. 1 } TWO ~ EXPOSED CORNERS. 2 ~ ; . . LOGGING pEvtcE . _ - - ---ff~t,OJDAT1~15 SEE: .r_'_ STRUCTURAL DWGS. _ , 1__..._..._ ._L__._,.i _._i a n `'CANE BOLTS. a 4 m PIER FOUNDATION v CENTER POST. , _ f C O 1 REINFORCED ARCt-iITFGTURAL 5(T1= CAST GONCRETf iU>~,i_ P~~€FLa - P,~';hT P-I, 14 RDOF pRAIN OVERFL.O~. " 2 REINFORCED ARCHITECTURAL S(TE CAST CONCRETE U1ALL PANELS -PAINT P-2. i5 FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION. ~ ~ , ~ , I6 O~~tERNEAD DOCK GOORS. 3 REINFORCED ARCHITECTURAL S(TE CAST CONCRETE RETAIN,NG uJALL PANELS -PAINT P-2. ~ I't TRANSOM UINDOUI ~ lU1 1!4" UJIRE CsLA55. 4 REINFORCED ARCHITECTURAL SITE CAST CONCRETE SCREEN iUALL PANELS -PAINT P-!. H a , ~ i,, r„ ~ i$ RECESSED I~;Cst-{TINCx IN SDFFIT ~30ARD 3E1`dND. ^~EE ELECTRICAL DRAUJINE~S. ~ 5 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DDORS , SOLAR GREEN ,NSULATED GLASS. 1 s ~ b CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT u1~` SOLAR GREEN NSU AT Ag5 !9 SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAUJI.NGS, _ ~ L ED L _ 2 ° METAL 5ERVCE 5TA RS. .r - - - 0 5' IUIDE x 5` HIGH LINDOL UJl I" 50LAR GREEN INSULATED GLA55 IN CLEAR ANODIZED i r ~ ' I ICJ E! _ 108 2 ALUMINUM FRAME. 21 DOCK SEALS -ALT. BID 3. AB-3 2 0 FINISH FLOOR, METAL SIGNBAND. 001-0 22 REVEALS CHAMFER 23 45° TRANSITION IN DOILNSPOUT. ------__..r_. i 13 6 12 SeET - IQ> ROOF BE'Y'OND. 24 FIRE COMMAND ROOM SIGNAGE U/ FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL, Q a n STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF. 2b LOCK POX PER FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL. c~ E EAS 26 GENERATOR ENCL05URE IN FOREGROUND. 3 ASTOM S ' ANT. < 12 EXPANSION JOINT lU/ EL ERIC EA1 EAST ELEVATION BUILDING C FDP4 4 1116°' a 1'-Oil 21 EXTEND DOUIN5POUT5 DOLUN INTO &DEUTALK CHA5E. I~6if-Oil 13 ROOF DRAIN SCUPPER. _ i PAC/F/CA DEVELOPMENT PHOPE~9T/ES LLC PLANNED /NDUSTH/AL DEVELOPMENT 36 '966"` FINAL DEf~EL OPMENT PLAN CHANGE OF ZONE TO A PLANNED /NDUSTR/AL DEI~EL OPEMENT 7 4 2 1 $ 19 ~ ~ ~0 19 ~ 19 I / I I ~ ~ t _ _ _ ~ i _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ f - - i ~ _ . _ - i ~ ~ ---r- ~ ~ 1 I ~ , - i i ~ ~ ~ - i ~ ~ ~`e- I / / , _ I 2 I' I ~j,~ I i r~~; ~ ~ i _ 2 I _ ' L_ i _ I-- I I ! ~ ~ ~ 1 j . I i r .__r_._,.~_ _7_.._,_.......__ . T..__. _ _ r _..._T. .,,`.r_~. r L____J L. _J ~ i__ J i _._~J ~ '.____J ~ L _..J i,._,.J i_..__J L_.__,~ T la ~s ~ ~ IAI_it a (I®/hiI I 10 14 i $ 4 5 7 19 10 I S9 f9 19 _ 19 19 ' ~ 21 ~ i / / ~ A>3-3 i , , _ I i ~~0 ~ 3 ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ I 22 v ~r ~ I i ( j ~ ( i j ~ ~ i ~ 1 ~ i I~ - - _ __d_._.__. _ \ ~ _ y__..._._ ~ I a i ~ { I .-_r.__._. ~ r t i ~ ~ ~ i 2 i f I i i i ~ ! ~ - ~ I 1 ! I ~ J .-J.. 1 _ 4_ ~ ~ ~ f' 7-P_ _7_ 7_ 7 ~ i i. ~ 1 ~ t______--1 i.____J !____7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~ 16; i ~ I ~ _ _ .I__T. _T_ . IZ J I A/__ !I ~ Ily®II ~ I~ `1 r. 1 i 19 i j I ~ I 18 ~ ~ 8 ~ li ~ I ~ I x~ ~ ( ~ 6 i 1 ~ _A____._ J L Fp 1 ~ ~ C i i ~ i i +a L___J L__. _.___li__.._t ~___J Cf1 a 5 6 0 L m L H e O). asw~~ ~f ll~li s Ila®q O a ~-i. N ! REINFD}~CED ARCHITECTURAL 51TE CAST CONCRETE IUALL PANELS PAINT ~'-1. 14 ROOF DRAIN OvERFLOtU. 0 - ~ 15 FIRE SERvICE CONNEGTION. 2 REINFORCED ,ARGHiTECTURAL 51TE GA5T CONGRETE IUALL PANELS -PAINT P-2. m DvERHEAD DOCK DOORS. Q 3 REINFORCED ARCHITECTURAL SITE GAST CONCRETE R~TA!NIN IvA' ' PAN 5 ~ PAINT ~2. 16 ~ L~ EL P ti 11 7RAN5OM WINDOUJ - WJ 1/4 QUIRE CzLA55. I 4 REINFORCED ARCHITECTURAL 51TE CAST CONCRETE GREEN UJALL PANELS -PAINT P-i. m 18 RECESSED LICxHTINC~ !N 50FFIT ~DARD E3E1'OND. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAUJINC~S. CLEAR ANDDI~'ED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOORS W/'` SOLAR GREEN fNSULATEp GLASS. _ ~ , i ~ 19 SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHTiNC~ FIXTURE. 5EE ELECTRICAL DRAUJINC~S. 6 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT UPI SOLAR GREEN INSULATED CsLASS. r 2 METAL SERvfCE STAIRS. - - <1JID~ x Vii' i-41Cs1-1 IllIN[~OI1J fill 1" BDI_Ai`c' CsRFFN 1N~i111 dT~') rl d5.5 ill ("I ~dl? dNnnl7~i") ~ ~ a ALUMINUM FRAME. -11. o ?I DOCK 5EAL5 - ALT. BID _ 3. AB-3 CD I _ R LU 8 METAL Sir%NBAND. I$ 12 REVEALS 2 9 1" CHAMFER 23 45° TRANSITION IN DOLUNSPOUT. f0 ROOF BEYOND. 24 °FIRE COMMAND ROOM" 51GNAGE W1 FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL. 1 Fy 1 I~ v 11 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF. 25 LOCK BOX PER FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL. i~ I a u~i 2f~ ~ 12 EXPANSION JOINT UJ/ ELASTOMERIC SEALANT, GENERATOR ENCLOSURE IN FOREGROUND. EAS 2°1 EXTEND DOUJNSPOUT5 DOUN INTO 51DELUALK CH,45E. 13 ROOF DRAIN SCUPPER. c V-0" 4-7 r I~E~AL DE~IPT1 ° ~N° CaP~NCENG AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER CF THE SW 1i4, OF THE PAC/F/CA DEVELOPMENT Pr?OPERT/ES LLC SE ;14, OF THE SW 1/4 aF SECTION i5, T3S, R69W, OF THE 6TW P,M., - SBT~ ~~NU~ NENCE S Oa°03'22' E, ALONG THE EA5T LINE aF SAID SW 1/4, aF ~ PLANNED /NDUSTi9/AL DEVELOPMENT 96-'966-E THE SE 1i4, Or Ti-I~ SW 114 OF SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 3a,Oa ~ FEET TO THE R16NT-OF- WAl' OF `'VEST 49TH AVENUE, AS SHOWN aN h-- U THE RECaRDEO PLAT aF INDEPENDENCE EXEC' T1V c~ ~ U E aFFICE PARk, ~ ~ AND ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGi.NNhNG, THENCE CONTIN IN U G S ~D, ~ OUTL/NE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OOra3`22" E ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE aF 529,b2 FEET TO ~ THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE aF INTERSTATE 7O AS 1'~~~° 0~ ~ ' / RECaRDED iN eaaK 1.54a, AT PAGE 744 OF THE REC aRDS aF ,;EFFERSON COUNTY, THENCE N 8E^4l'13` W ALONG SAID NORTHERLY ~ RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FaR INTERSTATE',a A DISTANCE OF 6a5,O3 / Z FEET Ta THE EASTERLY RIGHT-aF-INAY LINE aF INDEPENDENCE ~,-~2~.'d'~~~~_._..__...__..~- STREET AS SHOWN ON THE RE~CaRDED PLAT ~ - aF INDEPENDENCE EXECUTIVE aFFlCE PARK, THENCE ALONG SAID EASTER~.Y W 49TH RiGNT-aF-WAY LINE THE FOLLaWING 3 COURSES _ _ i. N 45~a2"51° W A DISTANCE aF 45 FEET, 2. N aO°a2'S1" Vd A DISTANCE aF 398.12 FEET ~ 3, N 44°57"ag" E A DISTAINCE aF i4.la FEET Ta A POINT aN THE ~ T~^ l SOUTH RIGHT-aF-WAY aF WEST 49TH A'JENUE, THENCE N 89°4T3a" ~~7(~IT~, E ALONG SAID ~OUTN R IGNT-OF=,~IAY LINE A DISTANCE aF 62x,36 FEET Ta THE PaiN T OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 3a3,bal SQUARE EE ~ OR b.9b97 ACRES MARE OR LESS. ER~ti41 T_TED 'E5~ N®~~'{.~ ALL 'USES AL~.~WED Uh OF THE FaLLaWiNG u~ I. ADULT ENTER T AINN9E~ NO ~~A ~d`NEA.T RIDGE CODE CI !b~ 2. AUTaMO83LE A.ND Lit 3, AUTO SERVECE AND I SNAPS, AUTO A~'vD LiG;- TUNE-UP SHOPS, ENGIN i 1 ALIGNMENT SERVICES, ~ U 1 1 1 RADIATOR REPAIR Shia ~ 1 U ~ 4. NaTELS, MCTELS OR TRANSIENT CCCrUPANC 1 1 O r~ l 1 z~: ~-G 1 zvNE~: A_r 5, MORTUARIES AND C~ ~ w 6. MaTaR FUEL iNG STA ww~aww®sww®ar~w•wrw~wo~rs~a ww wr~wwararrw~yw~~sw~~r~swa~~wwa~awsaewmww~.®usw ~rrie w+em mie®ww~w •wwwarwmacr~s°m ar~~ww ~wwwsw~wwww~~wwasn~mwws~wsa~ DRI'JE-IN RE~TAURAN ! A5 SMt7URV ON JUCHEM'S C~AI~EN PLACE, 8. RaaMING AND BaARI BCiC.?IC 2, F.~C.~sE 3 9, LUMBER YARDS, ~aCCEBS POINT la. PAWN SHOPS, 9 R}~1ry 5 89 3523` w ~2~.3~ IE. TAVERNS, NIGHT CLUB w w ~ W w r Mere~M► aiw O f w amw o w r ww a~~ s ww w.rr~ Mw a4~1~ w~Nrr w~ artier r a®~ w w w w aea~s s w ~erw, a r w w w. ~ p i d36~6' ~ 'Tar awwr rrrr s w 1r ~ ~p w ~r w w ~w~r w ~ ( 12. TNcATERS. i I I ) I I I I !3. WaQD WOR~;hNG BUS I I 1~' liTll.iTY E~4&E!"(ENT 1 f a....s 65, PG. Ib ; TYP) I PALING ANp 1 PACKING AND A~~l71QNAL !~E~P~9!TTE~? I DIVES ' ~ I DRIvES ~ * NO ADDITI ~ P _ ONAL ERMI ® ~ f ' m'~ ~ / ~ 'g ! t aCCUR BE~TWE T I ~ EN ~ HE N ~ I I s I ~ w._ _.~__.wa.____ I 1 ; w, _ ~ _ _ ~ L..r ~ . ~ ~ _ ~ J 1 I L .a ~ d _ re ~ RESEARCH wASaRATO I ~t ~ ~ ACILITiES , aR RESEAL i I ~ I z CONDUCTED BY aR FaR ~ 1 1 I 1 r" a CONCERN, VVNETHER PUE 1 1 1~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ i c~ Q '?E .AIL AND WNaLES~ I t9 z ~ '1ND h4ATERiALS DESIGN ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ _ AGRI ~ T~ }n 1 1~ I a ~ u CUY URE, MINING, 1 En1v~ ~ ~ RANSPOR T A.T(ON, BUILL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ExcLUDINC T;-aE ~ TaRAc Q d~ ~ ( a 4-EAVY- m IC WHEELED OR 7iRA I ~ BIJILDlNG PAD ~ ~ tau rw SCHOOLS aR INDUST 1 I~, $UILDING PAD ~ 'p' a w w,,;~'RINT~ING, ENGRAVING, I ~ I ~'EPRaDUGTiON PROCES 1 ~ 1 ~ i I 1 - 1 ~ WHOLESALE ~usINES$ Q ~ ~ I Li 6, MANUFACTURING. P E- Ra i # ~ IL I 1 ~ U ~ CaMBINATION TNEl2ECF 1 I 1 M ~ A iNSTRUME~NTS aF P~ r I T ( ( _ PNa ~ aGRAPHIC, aPTICA I N I I I ~ 1 m i ~ I ~ r~•* ~ 1 _.I E~E~ ~ R~t~AL ti4ACN~~ ~ I 1 I I u . , J t `ol..~esd. _ _ ~ : ~ ` I C, LIGHT 1NDU5 ~ RIAL 0 ,~.J ~ w dt _ - _ I ANl' aNE MACHINE DaES HORSEPaWER, (FORTY (4 U ' POINT .er.www~ere.r ...r " $ aQ"35''23" I11 1 1 PARKIl~x AND 'D')~ PROVIDED THAT ~ ....r w.w..eee~.., w.~s.. ~Oe ~waa'-e water I p Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a~~~° '°'a` }"fin ~/~a - DUST, EMISSlaN aF NEA i _ N DRl Y ~7 z - _ _ I _ 3 FUMES ARE PRODUCED T ~ i ~ 1 ~ ~ - DANGER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 5 ~9'35`23'~ ,~j ' ~ CNUS, NALARDOU, 0 1 ~ <5 CR~755 AGCi:g~1 + w ...r.wJ,. we.a. w w w w w w r w w " REASa!NABLE EN.iOYMEN N i ~ 15' 35' m i 184.~(D ~ ~ ( `---~!rE3s-EC~~ESS PA I 3~` iUATEfi~ r(AiN ~ , ~ ° PROPERTIES, NORSEPON I~aS~r!~NT RK t°JCs AND ~ ~aeEr~ENT ~ _ ~ , z!; ~ ~ PROdEDED Na45E D T. I DRIVES ~ ~ u$ . ~ 1 ~ ~ ~K P~. I~ i 1 i I z RESTRlCTIaNS ARE ME7 , I 1 I I w~ ' i I APPROVE D aN A CASE-B '"""ti 1 25' CRO~aa aGCES~~ WHEAT RIDGE DEPARTME I ~ iNC~RE58-EGR1r9S I T ~ DEVELaPMEN, STAFF, ~ ~ I i~A~EM~Nr I 1 I I 1 I ~ I • ~ WAR i ~r ro r I 1 I L ENO.,,~ING ~PJITN LIB i I I .~.r I I (3. OMITTED 1j- I 1 1~ I I ~ ! g I ' ~ 9. SHOPS FOR CUSTOM o ! r I ~ I ~ MATER~ALS, OR COMN9OD e_ I I T4-~ PREM' E A S S, ND V+INIE~ a I r. I I ~ f NIRTY-FN . E 35) NaRSEPt H 1 1 ~ ~ BUILDING PAD 1 AT C, , , I ~ I BUILDING, v AND D), 1 1 E I~ ~ xCES51VE N ~ I ~ I ~ a~sE, VIBRAi ~ GLARE, RADlAT(CN, SMOK I I BUILDING PAD ---_-.m THE EXTEN ~ THAT IT I S D. 1 ~v 1 ® I tA-1w I CBE NUISANCE Ta THE REASC 1 ~ ml~ ADJACENT PROPERTIES. t u~ r..,, ~ I ~ ( INVaLVE ~U~TOM WORK ~ ~ \ ° PREMISES, Na SINGLE MAi ` I I NORSEPaWER, PR VC a DED ~ ~ ~ I _1 I a , D~,,,,, EMISSIC 4. SMOKE, aR FUMES ARE PI a ~ ~ °'i ~e,e,: ~ PARKING ,QNr, IS DANGEROUS, NAZARDa ~ a>: ~m -~-o-w ~ ...,,~M DRIVES ~ ~ASONABLE ,~NJaYti1ENT ~ A5 SHrJILN oN JUCNEM'& ~ 1 r - J 1 PRaPERTIES. HaRSEPOWI CARDENPLACE. "°.w.~ ® 1 P ~w. ROVIDED NOISE, DUS~, VI rn BQOK 1, PACsE 3 r °"°r,w ! I4X1"~TINC~. ° v„ ® _ ° + a ry r S I~T,aNS ARE MET A x-+ ~ iN~sS~ - EGRE98 "J APPRaJED aN A CASE-87 1 4~g~ Ela5E1~ENT i ~ I WHEAT RIDGE DEPARTME~ ~ "`"+i+•+r,4 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ DEVELOPMENT STAFF. o r l„ i 'fir'"" «r u, Hal°s~""'*~.~ ~ '"1 PARKING AND _ Ek15TfNG ~ FQrn,~rnre on nn ~ '"h .'!►s _ 1 1 ! t'~i?li1~g TE~ aEFFERSON Q-QUNT1-CLERK ,VND_REC~ w N7 F:RCN 7- X84 P 7.4iE'144 AGGE38 'r+`" TES: DEPUTY ¢ POINT ' • ca 1+.,,,4 70 A NORTH ZONED: A- ANDSGAPEL7 AREA • MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA. RATIO - NOT TO EXCEED 35% COVERAGE Y a _ MAXIMUM BUILDING NEIGHTt r~ i' SWEET S*1 T E P L A N - 24' (30' FOR ARCNITECTURAL FEATURES} j Z P - 40'-0" H » MINIMUM LANDSCAPE COVERAGE= t j: s a - NOT LESS THAN 151 OD m On * MINIMUM PERIMETER SETBACKS ~ - 50' FROM RIGHT OF WAY 5' FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES SN T i C7"